Integer Holdings Corp - Quarter Report: 2010 July (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter ended July 2, 2010
Commission File Number 1-16137
GREATBATCH, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State of incorporation)
(State of incorporation)
16-1531026
(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
10000 Wehrle Drive
Clarence, New York
14031
(Address of principal executive offices)
Clarence, New York
14031
(Address of principal executive offices)
(716) 759-5600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the Companys common stock, $0.001 par value per share, as of
August 10, 2010 was: 23,249,387 shares.
Greatbatch, Inc.
Table of Contents for Form 10-Q
As of and for the Six Months Ended July 2, 2010
Table of Contents for Form 10-Q
As of and for the Six Months Ended July 2, 2010
Page # | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32 |
- 2 -
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS Unaudited
(in thousands except share and per share data)
(in thousands except share and per share data)
As of | ||||||||
July 2, | January 1, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 45,657 | $ | 37,864 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1.8 million in 2010 and $2.5 million in 2009 |
87,480 | 81,488 | ||||||
Inventories |
101,133 | 106,609 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
20,335 | 13,896 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
9,151 | 13,313 | ||||||
Total current assets |
263,756 | 253,170 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
143,614 | 153,601 | ||||||
Amortizing intangible assets, net |
76,977 | 82,076 | ||||||
Trademarks and tradenames |
20,288 | 20,288 | ||||||
Goodwill |
302,381 | 303,926 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,568 | 2,458 | ||||||
Other assets |
14,529 | 15,024 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 823,113 | $ | 830,543 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | | $ | 30,450 | ||||
Accounts payable |
32,591 | 34,395 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
2,409 | 403 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
65,878 | 67,996 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
100,878 | 133,244 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
263,721 | 258,972 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
61,740 | 54,043 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
4,424 | 4,560 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
430,763 | 450,819 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000
shares; no shares issued or outstanding in 2010 or 2009 |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares; 23,248,487 shares issued and 23,240,479 shares outstanding in 2010 23,190,105 shares issued and 23,157,097 shares outstanding in 2009 |
23 | 23 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
294,810 | 291,926 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 8,008 shares in 2010 and 33,008 shares in 2009 |
(154 | ) | (635 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
99,597 | 86,262 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
(1,926 | ) | 2,148 | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
392,350 | 379,724 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 823,113 | $ | 830,543 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Unaudited
(in thousands except per share data)
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Unaudited
(in thousands except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 140,795 | $ | 134,725 | $ | 272,824 | $ | 274,543 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
95,336 | 93,253 | 185,701 | 188,907 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
45,459 | 41,472 | 87,123 | 85,636 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
16,470 | 17,885 | 32,122 | 36,572 | ||||||||||||
Research, development and engineering costs, net |
11,177 | 8,694 | 22,201 | 16,569 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses, net |
495 | 2,424 | 1,487 | 5,227 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
28,142 | 29,003 | 55,810 | 58,368 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
17,317 | 12,469 | 31,313 | 27,268 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
5,139 | 4,930 | 10,287 | 9,819 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | (5 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
200 | (604 | ) | 516 | (397 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
11,981 | 8,145 | 20,515 | 17,873 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,193 | 1,583 | 7,180 | 4,647 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,788 | $ | 6,562 | $ | 13,335 | $ | 13,226 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.56 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
23,058 | 22,960 | 23,051 | 22,887 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
23,926 | 23,855 | 23,946 | 23,900 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,788 | $ | 6,562 | $ | 13,335 | $ | 13,226 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) |
(1,460 | ) | 3,934 | (4,654 | ) | 17 | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net |
107 | (230 | ) | 580 | 36 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 6,435 | $ | 10,266 | $ | 9,261 | $ | 13,279 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Unaudited
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 13,335 | $ | 13,226 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
23,446 | 23,473 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
2,765 | 4,918 | ||||||
Other non-cash losses |
1,221 | 49 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,770 | 2,943 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(6,649 | ) | 74 | |||||
Inventories |
4,809 | (4,151 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
2,137 | (163 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(595 | ) | (11,494 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
(199 | ) | (3,490 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
2,185 | (3,649 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
44,225 | 21,736 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment |
(6,416 | ) | (10,874 | ) | ||||
Purchase of cost method investments |
| (1,050 | ) | |||||
Other investing activities |
821 | (589 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(5,595 | ) | (12,513 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Principal payments of long-term debt |
(30,450 | ) | (23,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
| 12,000 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
640 | 49 | ||||||
Other financing activities |
(671 | ) | (736 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(30,481 | ) | (11,687 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
(356 | ) | (596 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
7,793 | (3,060 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
37,864 | 22,063 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 45,657 | $ | 19,003 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 5 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY Unaudited
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Treasury | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-In | Stock | Retained | Comprehensive | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Shares | Amount | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At January 1, 2010 |
23,190 | $ | 23 | $ | 291,926 | (33 | ) | $ | (635 | ) | $ | 86,262 | $ | 2,148 | $ | 379,724 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 2,765 | | | | | 2,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net shares issued under stock incentive plans |
58 | | 159 | 25 | 481 | | | 640 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax liability from stock options and
restricted stock |
| | (40 | ) | | | | | (40 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 13,335 | | 13,335 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss |
| | | | | | (4,074 | ) | (4,074 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At July 2, 2010 |
23,248 | $ | 23 | $ | 294,810 | (8 | ) | $ | (154 | ) | $ | 99,597 | $ | (1,926 | ) | $ | 392,350 | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information (Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 270, Interim Reporting)
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do
not include all of the information necessary for a fair presentation of financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Operating results for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year as a whole. In the
opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
results of Greatbatch, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Greatbatch Ltd. (collectively
Greatbatch or the Company) for the periods presented. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, sales, expenses, and related disclosures at the date of the financial
statements and during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these
estimates. The January 1, 2010 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from
audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2010. The Company utilizes a
fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest December 31st. For 52-week
years, each quarter contains 13 weeks. The second quarter of 2010 and 2009 each contained 13
weeks and ended on July 2, and July 3, respectively.
2. | SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities (in thousands): |
||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net |
$ | 580 | $ | 36 | ||||
Common stock contributed to 401(k) Plan |
| 4,015 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment purchases included in accounts
payable |
514 | 2,214 | ||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 4,571 | $ | 4,665 | ||||
Income taxes |
3,331 | 4,602 | ||||||
Acquisition of noncash assets |
$ | 350 | $ | 850 |
- 7 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
3. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
July 2, | January 1, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 47,674 | $ | 54,002 | ||||
Work-in-process |
30,071 | 28,329 | ||||||
Finished goods |
23,388 | 24,278 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 101,133 | $ | 106,609 | ||||
4. | INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
Amortizing intangible assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Gross | Foreign | Net | ||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Currency | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Translation | Amount | |||||||||||||
At July 2, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchased technology and patents |
$ | 83,023 | $ | (45,207 | ) | $ | 111 | $ | 37,927 | |||||||
Customer lists |
46,818 | (8,906 | ) | 248 | 38,160 | |||||||||||
Other |
3,519 | (2,633 | ) | 4 | 890 | |||||||||||
Total amortizing intangible assets |
$ | 133,360 | $ | (56,746 | ) | $ | 363 | $ | 76,977 | |||||||
At January 1, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchased technology and patents |
$ | 82,673 | $ | (42,289 | ) | $ | 399 | $ | 40,783 | |||||||
Customer lists |
46,818 | (7,264 | ) | 612 | 40,166 | |||||||||||
Other |
3,519 | (2,410 | ) | 18 | 1,127 | |||||||||||
Total amortizing intangible assets |
$ | 133,010 | $ | (51,963 | ) | $ | 1,029 | $ | 82,076 | |||||||
Aggregate amortization expense for the second quarter of 2010 and 2009 was $2.4 million and
$2.6 million, respectively. Aggregate amortization expense for the six months ended July
2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 was $4.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively. As of July 2,
2010, annual amortization expense is estimated to be $4.8 million for the remainder of
2010, $9.6 million for 2011, $9.4 million for 2012, $8.7 million for 2013 and $7.9 million
for 2014.
The change in goodwill is as follows (in thousands):
Greatbatch | ||||||||||||
Medical | Electrochem | Total | ||||||||||
At January 1, 2010 |
$ | 293,983 | $ | 9,943 | 303,926 | |||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(1,545 | ) | | (1,545 | ) | |||||||
At July 2, 2010 |
$ | 292,438 | $ | 9,943 | $ | 302,381 | ||||||
- 8 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
5. | DEBT |
Long-term debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):
July 2, | January 1, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Revolving line of credit |
$ | 98,000 | $ | 98,000 | ||||
2.25% convertible subordinated notes I |
| 30,450 | ||||||
2.25% convertible subordinated notes II, due 2013 |
197,782 | 197,782 | ||||||
Unamortized discount |
(32,061 | ) | (36,810 | ) | ||||
Total debt |
263,721 | 289,422 | ||||||
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
| (30,450 | ) | |||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 263,721 | $ | 258,972 | ||||
Revolving Line of Credit The Company has a senior credit facility (the Credit Facility)
consisting of a $235 million revolving credit facility, which can be increased to $335 million
upon the Companys request and approval by a majority of the lenders. The Credit Facility also
contains a $15 million letter of credit subfacility and a $15 million swingline subfacility. In
connection with the Electrochem Litigation described in Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies,
the Company was required to bond the amount of the judgment and statutory interest in order to
appeal. The Company satisfied this requirement by posting a bond, which required
collateralization. The Company received approval from the lenders supporting the Credit
Facility to increase the letter of credit subfacility by up to $35 million for use only in
connection with bonding the appeal of the Electrochem Litigation, of which $23 million was being
utilized as of July 2, 2010.
The Credit Facility is secured by the Companys non-realty assets including cash, accounts
receivable and inventories, and has an expiration date of May 22, 2012 with a one-time option to
extend to April 1, 2013 at the Companys option if no default has occurred. Interest rates
under the Credit Facility are, at the Companys option, based upon the current prime or LIBOR
rate plus a margin that varies with the Companys leverage ratio, as defined in the credit
agreement for the Credit Facility. If interest is paid based upon the prime rate, the
applicable margin is between minus 1.25% and 0.00%. If interest is paid based upon the LIBOR
rate, the applicable margin is between 1.00% and 2.00%. The Company is required to pay a fee on
its outstanding letter of credit equal to a margin between 1.125% and 2.125%, depending on the
Companys leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement. The Company is also required to
pay a commitment fee between 0.125% and 0.250% per annum on the unused portion of the Credit
Facility based on the Companys leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement.
The Credit Facility contains limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness, liens and licensing
of intellectual property, investments and certain payments. Except to the extent paid by the
issuance of common stock of Greatbatch or paid out of cash on hand, the Credit Facility limits
the amount paid for acquisitions in total to $100 million. The restrictions on payments, among
other things, limit repurchase of Greatbatch stock to $60 million and limit the ability of the
Company to make cash payments upon conversion of its convertible subordinated notes II. These
limitations can be waived upon the Companys request and approval of a simple majority of the
lenders.
- 9 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain a ratio of adjusted EBITDA, as defined in
the credit agreement, to interest expense of at least 3.00 to 1.00, and a total leverage ratio,
as defined in the credit agreement, of not greater than 4.50 to 1.00. The calculation of
adjusted EBITDA and leverage ratio exclude non-cash charges, as well as charges in connection
with the Electrochem Litigation up to $35 million. As of July 2, 2010, the Company was in
compliance with all covenants.
The Credit Facility contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the
continuance of an event of default, a majority of the lenders may declare the outstanding
advances and all other obligations under the Credit Facility immediately due and payable.
The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the Companys revolving line of credit as
of July 2, 2010, which does not include the impact of the interest rate swaps described below,
was 1.49% and resets based upon the six-month LIBOR rate. As of July 2, 2010, the Company had
$114 million of borrowing capacity available under the Credit Facility. This amount may vary
from period to period based upon the debt levels of the Company as well as the level of EBITDA
which impacts the covenant calculations described above. The interest rate on the $23 million
letter of credit outstanding as of July 2, 2010 was 1.125%.
Interest Rate Swaps The Company has entered into three receive floating, pay fixed
interest rate swaps indexed to the six-month LIBOR rate. The objective of these swaps is to
hedge against potential changes in cash flows on the Companys outstanding revolving line of
credit, which is also indexed to the six-month LIBOR rate. No credit risk was hedged. The
receive variable leg of the swap and the variable rate paid on the revolving line of credit bear
the same rate of interest, excluding the credit spread, and reset and pay interest on the same
dates. The Company intends to continue electing the six-month LIBOR as the benchmark interest
rate on the debt being hedged. If the Company repays the debt, it intends to replace the hedged
item with similarly indexed cash flows.
Information regarding the Companys outstanding interest rate swaps is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
Current | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | Receive | Value | Balance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of | Notional | Start | End | Fixed | Floating | July 2, | Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Instrument | Hedge | Amount | Date | Date | Rate | Rate | 2010 | Location | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Int. rate swap |
Cash flow | $ | 80,000 | 3/5/2008 | 7/7/2010 | 3.09 | % | 0.43 | % | $ | (30 | ) | Other Current Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Int. rate swap |
Cash flow | 18,000 | 12/18/2008 | 12/18/2010 | 2.00 | % | 0.75 | % | (105 | ) | Other Current Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Int. rate swap |
Cash flow | 50,000 | 7/7/2010 | 7/7/2011 | 2.16 | % | 6M LIBOR | (654 | ) | Other Long-Term Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | (789 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The estimated fair value of the interest rate swap agreements represents the amount the
Company would have to pay to terminate the contracts. No portion of the change in fair value of
the interest rate swaps during the 2010 or 2009 periods was considered ineffective. The amount
recorded as additional Interest Expense related to the interest rate swaps for the second
quarter of 2010 and 2009 was $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and $1.2 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, for the six months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Convertible Subordinated Notes In May 2003, the Company completed a private placement of $170
million of 2.25% convertible subordinated notes, due June 15, 2013 (CSN I). In March 2007,
the Company entered into separate, privately negotiated agreements to exchange $117.8 million of
CSN I for an equivalent principal amount of a new series of 2.25% convertible subordinated notes
due 2013 (CSN II) (collectively the Exchange) at a 5% discount. The primary purpose of the
Exchange was to eliminate the June 15, 2010 call and put option that was included in the terms
of CSN I. In connection with the Exchange, the Company issued an additional $80 million
aggregate principal amount of CSN II at a price of $950 per $1,000 of principal. In December
2008, the Company entered into privately negotiated agreements under which it repurchased $21.8
million in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding CSN I at $845.38 per $1,000 of
principal. The primary purpose of this transaction was to retire the notes, which contained a
put option exercisable on June 15, 2010, at a discount. During the second quarter of 2010 the
holders of the remaining $30.5 million of CSN I notes exercised their put option. These notes
were repaid with cash on hand.
CSN II notes bear interest at 2.25% per annum, payable semi-annually, and are due on June 15,
2013. The holders may convert the notes into shares of the Companys common stock at a
conversion price of $34.70 per share, which is equivalent to a conversion ratio of 28.8219
shares per $1,000 of principal. The conversion price and the conversion ratio will adjust
automatically upon certain changes to the Companys capitalization. CSN II notes were issued at
a price of $950 per $1,000 of principal. The fair value of CSN II as of July 2, 2010 was
approximately $177 million and is based on recent sales prices.
The effective interest rate of CSN II, which takes into consideration the amortization of the
discount and deferred fees related to the issuance of these notes is 8.5%. The discount on CSN
II is being amortized to the maturity date of the convertible notes utilizing the effective
interest method. As of July 2, 2010, the carrying amount of the discount related to the CSN II
conversion option value was $27.1 million. As of July 2, 2010, the if-converted value of the
CSN II notes does not exceed their principal amount as the Companys closing stock price of
$22.00 per share did not exceed the conversion price of $34.70 per share.
The contractual interest and discount amortization for CSN II were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Contractual interest |
$ | 1,113 | $ | 1,113 | $ | 2,225 | $ | 2,225 | ||||||||
Discount amortization |
2,394 | 2,240 | 4,748 | 4,444 |
- 11 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The notes are convertible at the option of the holders at such time as: (i) the closing price of
the Companys common stock exceeds 150% of the conversion price of the notes for 20 out of 30
consecutive trading days; (ii) the trading price per $1,000 of principal is less than 98% of the
product of the closing sale price of common stock for each day during any five consecutive
trading day period and the conversion rate per $1,000 of principal; (iii) the notes have been
called for redemption; (iv) the Company distributes to all holders of common stock rights or
warrants entitling them to purchase additional shares of common stock at less than the average
closing price of common stock for the ten
trading days immediately preceding the announcement of the distribution; (v) the Company
distributes to all holders of common stock any form of dividend which has a per share value
exceeding 5% of the price of the common stock on the day prior to such date of distribution;
(vi) the Company affects a consolidation, merger, share exchange or sale of assets pursuant to
which its common stock is converted to cash or other property; (vii) the period beginning 60
days prior to but excluding June 15, 2013; and (viii) certain fundamental changes, as defined in
the indenture agreement, occur or are approved by the Board of Directors.
Conversions in connection with corporate transactions that constitute a fundamental change
require the Company to pay a premium make-whole amount, based upon a predetermined table as set
forth in the indenture agreement, whereby the conversion ratio on the notes may be increased by
up to 7.4 shares per $1,000 of principal. The premium make-whole amount will be paid in shares
of common stock upon any such conversion, subject to the net share settlement feature of the
notes described below.
CSN II contains a net share settlement feature that requires the Company to pay cash for each
$1,000 of principal to be converted. Any amounts in excess of $1,000 will be settled in shares
of the Companys common stock, or at the Companys option, cash. The Company has a one-time
irrevocable election to pay the holders in shares of its common stock, which it currently does
not plan to exercise.
The notes are redeemable by the Company at any time on or after June 20, 2012, or at the option
of a holder upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes, as defined in the indenture
agreement, affecting the Company. The notes are subordinated in right of payment to all of our
senior indebtedness and effectively subordinated to all debts and other liabilities of the
Companys subsidiaries.
Deferred Financing Fees The change in deferred financing fees is as follows (in thousands):
At January 1, 2010 |
$ | 3,028 | ||
Amortization during the period |
(539 | ) | ||
At July 2, 2010 |
$ | 2,489 | ||
6. | PENSION PLANS |
The Company is required to provide its employees located in Switzerland and France certain
defined pension benefits. These benefits accrue to employees based upon years of service,
position, age and compensation. The defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits to the
Companys employees located in Switzerland is a funded contributory plan while the pension plan
that provides benefits to the Companys employees located in France is unfunded and
noncontributory. The liability and corresponding expense related to these pension plans is
based on actuarial computations of current and future benefits for employees. Pension expense
is charged to current operating expenses.
- 12 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The change in net pension liability is as follows (in thousands):
At January 1, 2010 |
$ | 3,974 | ||
Net periodic pension cost |
478 | |||
Benefit payments |
(460 | ) | ||
Foreign currency translation |
(190 | ) | ||
At July 2, 2010 |
$ | 3,802 | ||
Net pension cost is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 229 | $ | 218 | $ | 469 | $ | 428 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
100 | 99 | 206 | 195 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
6 | 32 | 11 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(102 | ) | (78 | ) | (208 | ) | (153 | ) | ||||||||
Net pension cost |
$ | 233 | $ | 271 | $ | 478 | $ | 532 | ||||||||
7. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
Compensation costs related to share-based payments for the three months ended July 2, 2010 and
July 3, 2009 totaled $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Compensation costs related to
share-based payments for the six months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 totaled $2.8 million
and $2.8 million, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows includes, when incurred, costs recognized for the annual
share contribution to the Companys 401(k) Plan as well as for share-based payments.
The weighted average fair value and assumptions used to value options granted are as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Weighted average fair value |
$ | 8.24 | $ | 8.63 | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.62 | % | 2.02 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
40 | % | 39 | % | ||||
Expected life (in years) |
5 | 6 | ||||||
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % |
- 13 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The following table summarizes time-vested stock option activity:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Weighted | Remaining | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
Time-Vested | Average | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Stock | Exercise | Life | Value | |||||||||||||
Options | Price | (In Years) | (In Millions) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
1,362,123 | $ | 23.94 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
239,253 | 20.57 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(33,296 | ) | 19.22 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(71,291 | ) | 24.77 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at July 2, 2010 |
1,496,789 | $ | 23.48 | 6.8 | $ | 1.6 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at July 2, 2010 |
952,487 | $ | 24.12 | 5.8 | $ | 1.1 | ||||||||||
The following table summarizes performance-vested stock option activity:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Weighted | Remaining | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
Performance- | Average | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Vested Stock | Exercise | Life | Value | |||||||||||||
Options | Price | (In Years) | (In Millions) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
1,001,984 | $ | 24.48 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(219,848 | ) | 27.30 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at July 2, 2010 |
782,136 | $ | 23.69 | 7.7 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at July 2, 2010 |
206,255 | $ | 22.86 | 5.7 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||||||
The performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2010 only vest if certain performance
metrics are achieved. The amount of shares that ultimately vest range from 0 shares to 280,419
shares based upon the total shareholder return of the Company relative to the Companys
compensation peer group, as disclosed in the Companys definitive proxy statement filed on April
20, 2010, over a three year performance period beginning in the year of grant.
- 14 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The following table summarizes time-vested restricted stock and unit activity:
Weighted | ||||||||
Time-Vested | Average | |||||||
Activity | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2010 |
160,998 | $ | 24.28 | |||||
Granted |
102,379 | 20.70 | ||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(10,188 | ) | 25.02 | |||||
Nonvested at July 2, 2010 |
253,189 | $ | 22.82 | |||||
The following table summarizes performance-vested restricted stock and unit activity:
Performance- | Weighted | |||||||
Vested | Average | |||||||
Activity | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2010 |
24,000 | $ | 22.59 | |||||
Granted |
280,419 | 14.46 | ||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(200 | ) | 18.47 | |||||
Nonvested at July 2, 2010 |
304,219 | $ | 15.10 | |||||
8. | OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES, NET |
Other operating expenses, net is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations(a) |
$ | 536 | $ | 1,578 | $ | 856 | $ | 3,477 | ||||||||
Integration costs(b) |
8 | 717 | 130 | 1,580 | ||||||||||||
Asset dispositions and other(c) |
(49 | ) | 129 | 501 | 170 | |||||||||||
$ | 495 | $ | 2,424 | $ | 1,487 | $ | 5,227 | |||||||||
(a) | 2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations. In the first quarter of 2007, the Company announced that it would close its Electrochem manufacturing facility in Canton, MA and construct a new 81,000 square foot replacement facility in Raynham, MA. This initiative was not cost savings driven but capacity driven and was completed in the first quarter of 2009. |
In the second quarter of 2007, the Company announced that it would consolidate its corporate
offices in Clarence, NY into its existing research and development center also in Clarence, NY
after an expansion of that facility was complete. This expansion and relocation was completed
in the third quarter of 2008.
During the second and third quarters of 2008, the Company reorganized and consolidated various
general and administrative and research and development functions throughout the organization in
order to optimize those resources with the businesses it acquired in 2007 and 2008.
- 15 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
In the second half of 2008, the Company ceased manufacturing at its facility in Suzhou, China
(Electrochem), closed its leased manufacturing facility in Orchard Park, NY (Electrochem), and
consolidated its Saignelegier, Switzerland manufacturing facility (orthopaedics). The
operations of these facilities were relocated to existing facilities that had excess capacity.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, management approved a plan for the consolidation of its
Teterboro, NJ (Electrochem manufacturing), Blaine, Minnesota (vascular manufacturing) and Exton,
Pennsylvania (orthopaedics corporate office) facilities into existing facilities that had excess
capacity. The Blaine, MN and Exton, PA consolidations were completed in the second quarter of
2009. The Teterboro, NJ initiative was substantially completed in the fourth quarter of 2009.
The total cost incurred for these facility shutdowns and consolidations was $16.8 million and
included the following:
a. | Severance and retention $4.4 million; |
b. | Production inefficiencies, moving and revalidation $5.2 million; |
c. | Accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs $4.8 million; |
d. | Personnel $0.7 million; and |
e. | Other $1.7 million. |
All categories of costs are considered to be cash expenditures, except accelerated depreciation
and asset write-offs. Costs incurred during 2010 relating to these initiatives primarily
related to the Electrochem business segment. For the six months ended July 3, 2009, costs
relating to these initiatives of $1.4 million and $2.1 million were included in the Greatbatch
Medical and Electrochem business segments, respectively.
As a result of these consolidation initiatives, one Greatbatch Medical facility and one
Electrochem facility are classified as held for sale as of July 2, 2010. These facilities are
recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell. The
fair value of these facilities is primarily determined by reference to recent sales data for
comparable facilities taking into consideration recent offers, if any, received from prospective
buyers of the facility, which is categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. These
facilities are expected to be sold within the next year and have a carrying value of $3.6
million as of July 2, 2010 and are included in Other Current Assets in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a $0.6
million write down related to its Electrochem facility, as the estimated fair value less costs
to sell was below the recorded book value. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold
its Saignelegier, Switzerland facility for $1.1 million, which was previously classified as held
for sale. No gain or loss was recognized during the period related to this facility.
- 16 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The change in accrued liabilities related to the 2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations
is as follows (in thousands):
Production | Accelerated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance | Inefficiencies, | Depreciation/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
and | Moving and | Asset Write- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retention | Revalidation | offs | Personnel | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
At January 2, 2009 |
$ | 594 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 594 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
1,796 | 2,948 | 671 | 534 | 1,120 | 7,069 | ||||||||||||||||||
Write-offs |
| | (671 | ) | | | (671 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash payments |
(1,466 | ) | (2,948 | ) | | (534 | ) | (1,120 | ) | (6,068 | ) | |||||||||||||
At January 1, 2010 |
$ | 924 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 924 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 153 | 570 | 68 | 65 | 856 | ||||||||||||||||||
Write-offs |
| | (570 | ) | | | (570 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash payments |
(924 | ) | (153 | ) | | (68 | ) | (65 | ) | (1,210 | ) | |||||||||||||
At July 2, 2010 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
(b) | Integration costs. During 2010 and 2009, the Company incurred costs related to the integration of the companies acquired in 2007 and 2008. The integration initiatives include the implementation of the Oracle ERP system, training and compliance with Company policies as well as the implementation of lean manufacturing and six sigma initiatives. These expenses are primarily for consultants, relocation and travel costs that will not be required after the integrations are completed. | |
(c) | Asset dispositions and other. During 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded write-downs in connection with various asset disposals, which were partially offset by insurance proceeds received. |
9. | INCOME TAXES |
The income tax provision for interim periods is determined using an estimate of the annual
effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken into account in the
relevant period. Each quarter, the estimate of the annual effective tax rate is updated, and if
the estimated effective tax rate changes, a cumulative adjustment is made. There is a potential
for volatility of the effective tax rate due to several factors, including changes in the mix of
the pre-tax income and the jurisdictions to which it relates, business acquisitions, settlements
with taxing authorities and foreign currency fluctuations.
As discussed in Note 5 Debt, $30.5 million of CSN I were put back to the Company during the
second quarter of 2010. This transaction resulted in discharge of indebtedness (COD) income
for tax purposes. Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009, an election can
be made to defer such COD income and begin recognizing over a 5 year period, beginning in 2014.
At this time, it is the Companys intent to make this election, which is made with the filing of
the 2010 tax return. As such, the tax liability associated with the COD income (approximately
$6 million) has been classified as non-current Deferred Income Taxes.
- 17 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
During the quarter ended July 2, 2010, there has been no change in the balance of unrecognized
tax benefits. Approximately $1.9 million of the balance of unrecognized tax benefits would
favorably impact the effective tax rate (net of federal benefit on state issues), if recognized. It is
reasonably possible that a reduction of approximately $0.7 million of the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months as a result of the expiration
of applicable statutes of limitation.
10. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Litigation The Company is a party to various legal actions arising in the normal course of
business. While the Company does not believe, except as indicated below, that the ultimate
resolution of any such pending actions will have a material adverse effect on its results of
operations, financial position or cash flows, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties.
If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse
impact in the period in which the ruling occurs.
As previously reported, the Company is appealing the September 2009 jury verdict in the
Input/Output Marine Systems action against the Company (Electrochem Litigation). During the
third quarter of 2009, the Company accrued $34.5 million in connection with this litigation.
During the appeal process, interest on the judgment will accrue based upon the Louisiana
statutory rate, which is currently 3.75% per annum. The amount of interest that has accrued on
this judgment through July 2, 2010 is $0.4 million.
The litigation previously reported in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended on January 1, 2010 commenced against the Company by its insurance carrier that had been
paying the cost of defense in the Electrochem Litigation has been settled. Under the terms of
the settlement agreement, the insurer has no further obligation to defend the Company, but the
Company has no obligation to reimburse the insurer for defense costs expended prior to the jury
verdict.
With regard to the previously reported
patent infringement action filed by Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc.
(“Pressure Products”), in August 2010 the parties reached an
agreement to settle the litigation. In exchange for a cash payment by the
Company, Pressure Products will grant a covenant not to sue on the
Company’s FlowGuardTM and OptiSealTM introducer products
and dismiss its claims against the Company. No further material
litigation charges are anticipated with regards to this litigation as a result
of this settlement. As part of the settlement, the litigation commenced by the
Company against Pressure Products also will be dismissed.
Product Warranties The Company generally warrants that its products will meet customer
specifications and will be free from defects in materials and workmanship. The Company accrues
its estimated exposure to warranty claims based upon recent historical experience and other
specific information as it becomes available.
- 18 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The change in aggregate product warranty liability for the quarter is as follows (in thousands):
Beginning balance at April 2, 2010 |
$ | 1,692 | ||
Additions to warranty reserve |
340 | |||
Warranty claims paid |
(436 | ) | ||
Ending balance at July 2, 2010 |
$ | 1,596 | ||
Purchase Commitments Contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as
agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on the Company and that specify all
significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or
variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Our purchase orders
are normally based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within
short time horizons. We enter into blanket orders with vendors that have preferred pricing and
terms, however these orders are normally cancelable by us without penalty. As of July 2, 2010,
the total contractual obligation related to such expenditures is approximately $10.4 million and
will be financed by existing cash and cash equivalents or cash generated from operations over
the next twelve months. We also enter into contracts for outsourced services; however, the
obligations under these contracts were not significant and the contracts generally contain
clauses allowing for cancellation without significant penalty.
Operating Leases The Company is a party to various operating lease agreements for buildings,
equipment and software. Minimum future annual operating lease payments are $1.5 million for the
remainder of 2010; $2.0 million in 2011; $1.9 million in 2012; $1.8 million in 2013; $1.9
million in 2014 and $6.4 million thereafter. The Company primarily leases buildings, which
accounts for the majority of the future lease payments.
Foreign Currency Contracts In February 2009, the Company entered into forward contracts to
purchase 10 million Mexican pesos per month from March 2009 to December 2009 at an exchange rate
of 14.85 pesos per one U.S. dollar. These contracts were entered into in order to hedge the
risk of peso-denominated payments associated with the operations at the Companys Tijuana,
Mexico facility for 2009. These contracts were accounted for as cash flow hedges. The amount
recorded as a reduction of Cost of Sales during the six months ended July 3, 2009 related to
these forward contracts was $0.2 million.
In December 2009, the Company entered into forward contracts to purchase 6.6 million Mexican
pesos per month from January 2010 to December 2010 at an exchange rate of 13.159 pesos per one
U.S. dollar. In February 2010, the Company entered into forward contracts to purchase an
additional 3.3 million Mexican pesos per month from February 2010 to December 2010 at an
exchange rate of 13.1595 pesos per one U.S. dollar. These contracts were entered into in order
to hedge a portion of the risk of peso-denominated payments associated with the operations at
the Companys Tijuana, Mexico facility for 2010 and are being accounted for as cash flow hedges.
As of July 2, 2010, these contracts had a negative fair value of $0.02 million, which is
recorded within Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet. The amount recorded as a reduction of Cost of Sales during the six months ended
July 2, 2010 related to these forward contracts was $0.3 million. No portion of the change in
fair value of the Companys foreign currency contracts during the six months ended July 2, 2010
or July 3, 2009 was considered ineffective.
- 19 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Subsequent Event In July 2010, the Company entered into a forward contract to purchase
6.6 million Mexican pesos per month from January 2011 to December 2011 at an exchange rate of
13.2231 pesos per one U.S. dollar. This contract was entered into in order to hedge the risk of
peso-denominated payments associated with a portion of the operations at the Companys Tijuana,
Mexico facility for 2011 and will be accounted for as a cash flow hedge.
Self-Insured Medical Plan In an attempt to help offset the cost of rising health care
expenses, in 2010, the Company began self-funding the medical insurance coverage for all of its
U.S. based employees. The risk to the Company is being limited through the use of stop loss
insurance which has annual deductibles in the amount of $0.2 million per covered participant and
$9.9 million in the aggregate. The maximum benefit for aggregate losses is $1.0 million and
$4.8 million for specific losses. As of July 2, 2010, the Company has $2.2 million accrued
related to the self-insurance of its medical plan, which is recorded as Accrued Expenses and
Other Current Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, and is based upon prior
years claim history.
11. | EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS) |
The following table illustrates the calculation of basic and diluted EPS (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Numerator for basic EPS: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,788 | $ | 6,562 | $ | 13,335 | $ | 13,226 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on convertible notes and related
deferred financing fees, net of tax |
111 | 130 | 241 | 260 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for diluted EPS |
$ | 7,899 | $ | 6,692 | $ | 13,576 | $ | 13,486 | ||||||||
Denominator for basic EPS: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
23,058 | 22,960 | 23,051 | 22,887 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Convertible subordinated notes |
630 | 756 | 693 | 756 | ||||||||||||
Stock options and unvested restricted stock |
238 | 139 | 202 | 257 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted EPS |
23,926 | 23,855 | 23,946 | 23,900 | ||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.56 | ||||||||
- 20 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The diluted weighted average share calculations do not include the following securities, which are
not dilutive to the EPS calculations:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Time-vested stock options, restricted stock and
restricted stock units |
1,118,000 | 1,289,000 | 1,372,000 | 1,314,000 | ||||||||||||
Performance-vested stock options and restricted
stock units |
942,000 | 942,000 | 956,000 | 942,000 |
12. | COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
The Companys comprehensive income as reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income includes net income, foreign currency translation gains
(losses) and unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges.
The Company translates all assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiaries, where the U.S.
dollar is not the functional currency, at the period-end exchange rate and translates income and
expenses at the average exchange rates in effect during the period. The net effect of these
translation adjustments is recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements as
comprehensive income (loss). Translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they
relate to permanent investments in the Companys foreign subsidiaries.
The Company has designated its interest rate swaps and foreign currency contracts (See Notes 5
Debt and 10 Commitments and Contingencies) as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective
portion of any change in the fair value of these instruments is recorded in comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax, and reclassified into earnings (Interest Expense Swaps, Cost of Sales FX
Contracts) in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Gains and losses on the derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current
earnings.
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Defined | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit | Foreign | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension | Cash | Currency | Total | Net-of- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Plan | Flow | Translation | Pre-Tax | Tax | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liability | Hedges | Adjustment | Amount | Tax | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
At January 1, 2010 |
$ | (1,455 | ) | $ | (1,701 | ) | $ | 4,334 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 970 | $ | 2,148 | ||||||||||
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges |
| (130 | ) | | (130 | ) | 46 | (84 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Realized loss on cash flow hedges |
| 1,021 | | 1,021 | (357 | ) | 664 | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation loss |
| | (4,654 | ) | (4,654 | ) | | (4,654 | ) | |||||||||||||||
At July 2, 2010 |
$ | (1,455 | ) | $ | (810 | ) | $ | (320 | ) | $ | (2,585 | ) | $ | 659 | $ | (1,926 | ) | |||||||
- 21 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
13. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
The following table provides information regarding assets and liabilities recorded at fair value
in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 2, 2010 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | ||||||||||||||||
Prices in | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
At | for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
July 2, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Asset held for sale |
$ | 1,500 | $ | | $ | 1,500 | $ | | ||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
$ | 21 | $ | | $ | 21 | $ | | ||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
789 | | 789 | |
Asset held for sale Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of their
carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell. For the property written-down in the
second quarter of 2010, the fair value was primarily determined by reference to recent offers
received from prospective buyers of the facility. The Companys assets held for sale that are
recorded at fair value are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Foreign currency contracts The fair value of foreign currency contracts are determined
through the use of cash flow models that utilize observable market data inputs to estimate fair
value. These observable market data inputs include foreign exchange rate and credit spread
curves. In addition to the above, the Company receives fair value estimates from the foreign
currency contract counterparty to verify the reasonableness of the Companys estimates. The
Companys foreign currency contracts are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Interest rate swaps The fair value of interest rate swaps are determined through the
use of cash flow models that utilize observable market data inputs to estimate fair value.
These observable market data inputs include LIBOR and swap rates, and credit spread curves. In
addition to the above, the Company receives fair value estimates from the interest rate swap
counterparty to verify the reasonableness of the Companys estimates. The Companys interest
rate swaps are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Convertible subordinated notes The fair value of the Companys convertible
subordinated notes disclosed in Note 5 Debt were determined based upon recent third-party
transactions for the Companys notes in an inactive market. The Companys convertible
subordinated notes are valued for disclosure purposes utilizing Level 2 measurements of the fair
value hierarchy.
- 22 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Cost method investments The Company holds certain cost method investments that are
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition.
The fair value of a cost method investment is only estimated if there are identified events or
changes in circumstances that indicate impairment may be present. The aggregate carrying amount
of our cost method investments included in Other Assets was $11.9 million as of July 2, 2010 and
January 1, 2010.
14. | BUSINESS SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHIC AND CONCENTRATION RISK INFORMATION |
The Company operates its business in two reportable segments Greatbatch Medical and
Electrochem Solutions (Electrochem). The Greatbatch Medical segment designs and manufactures
components and devices for the CRM, neuromodulation, vascular and orthopaedics markets.
Additionally, the Greatbatch Medical business offers value-added assembly and design engineering
services for products that incorporate Greatbatch Medical components.
Electrochem designs, manufactures and distributes electrochemical cells, battery packs and
wireless sensors for demanding applications in markets such as energy, security, portable
medical, environmental monitoring and more.
The Company defines segment income from operations as sales less cost of sales including
amortization and expenses attributable to segment-specific selling, general and administrative,
research, development and engineering expenses, and other operating expenses. Segment income
also includes a portion of non-segment specific selling, general and administrative expenses
based on allocations appropriate to the expense categories. The remaining unallocated operating
expenses are primarily corporate headquarters and administrative function expenses. The
unallocated operating expenses along with other expense are not allocated to reportable
segments. Transactions between the two segments are not significant. An analysis and
reconciliation of the Companys business segment, product line and geographic information to the
respective information in the condensed consolidated financial statements follows. Sales by
geographic area are presented by allocating sales from external customers based on where the
products are shipped to (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Greatbatch Medical |
||||||||||||||||
CRM/Neuromodulation |
$ | 78,838 | $ | 78,026 | $ | 155,763 | $ | 155,293 | ||||||||
Vascular |
11,007 | 9,152 | 19,173 | 19,885 | ||||||||||||
Orthopaedics |
30,488 | 31,389 | 59,929 | 65,472 | ||||||||||||
Total Greatbatch Medical |
120,333 | 118,567 | 234,865 | 240,650 | ||||||||||||
Electrochem |
20,462 | 16,158 | 37,959 | 33,893 | ||||||||||||
Total sales |
$ | 140,795 | $ | 134,725 | $ | 272,824 | $ | 274,543 | ||||||||
- 23 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Segment income (loss) from operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Greatbatch Medical |
$ | 18,183 | $ | 15,736 | $ | 32,213 | $ | 32,374 | ||||||||
Electrochem |
3,331 | (335 | ) | 7,084 | 1,060 | |||||||||||
Total segment income from operations |
21,514 | 15,401 | 39,297 | 33,434 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated operating expenses |
(4,197 | ) | (2,932 | ) | (7,984 | ) | (6,166 | ) | ||||||||
Operating income as reported |
17,317 | 12,469 | 31,313 | 27,268 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated other expense |
(5,336 | ) | (4,324 | ) | (10,798 | ) | (9,395 | ) | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
$ | 11,981 | $ | 8,145 | $ | 20,515 | $ | 17,873 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Sales by geographic area: |
||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 67,170 | $ | 62,866 | $ | 125,389 | $ | 134,088 | ||||||||
Non-Domestic locations: |
||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico |
23,533 | 21,879 | 46,136 | 37,198 | ||||||||||||
Belgium |
14,528 | 4,318 | 30,713 | 4,383 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom & Ireland |
11,421 | 15,925 | 25,049 | 31,297 | ||||||||||||
France |
1,703 | 14,259 | 3,746 | 33,963 | ||||||||||||
Rest of world |
22,440 | 15,478 | 41,791 | 33,614 | ||||||||||||
Total sales |
$ | 140,795 | $ | 134,725 | $ | 272,824 | $ | 274,543 | ||||||||
Four customers accounted for a significant portion of the Companys sales as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Customer A |
22 | % | 22 | % | 23 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||
Customer B |
19 | % | 16 | % | 18 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||
Customer C |
11 | % | 13 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||
Customer D |
7 | % | 12 | % | 8 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||
59 | % | 63 | % | 61 | % | 60 | % | |||||||||
- 24 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Long-lived tangible assets by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
July 2, | January 1, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
United States |
$ | 125,318 | $ | 132,605 | ||||
Rest of world |
34,393 | 38,478 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 159,711 | $ | 171,083 | ||||
15. | IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
In the normal course of business, management evaluates all new accounting pronouncements issued
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) or other authoritative accounting bodies to determine the potential impact they may
have on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. Based upon this review, management
does not expect any of the recently issued accounting pronouncements, which have not already
been adopted, to have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Our Business
We operate our business in two reportable segments Greatbatch Medical and Electrochem Solutions
(Electrochem). Greatbatch Medical designs and manufactures systems, components and devices for
the cardiac rhythm management (CRM), neuromodulation, vascular and orthopaedics markets.
Greatbatch Medical customers include large multi-national original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs). Greatbatch Medical products include: 1) batteries, capacitors, filtered and unfiltered
feedthroughs, engineered components and enclosures used in implantable medical devices (IMDs); 2)
introducers, catheters, steerable sheaths and implantable stimulation leads; and 3) instruments and
delivery systems used in hip and knee replacement, trauma and spine surgeries as well as hip, knee
and shoulder implants. Additionally, Greatbatch Medical offers value-added assembly and design
engineering services for medical systems and devices within the markets in which it operates.
Electrochem provides technology solutions for critical industrial applications, including
customized battery power and wireless sensing systems. Originating from the lithium cell invented
for the implantable pacemaker by our Companys founder, Wilson Greatbatch, Electrochems technology
and superior quality and reliability is utilized in markets world-wide.
Our Customers
Greatbatch Medical customers include leading OEMs, in alphabetical order here and throughout this
report, such as Biotronik, Boston Scientific, DePuy, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Smith & Nephew,
Sorin Group, St. Jude Medical, Stryker and Zimmer. The nature and extent of our selling
relationships with each OEM varies in terms of breadth of products purchased, purchased product
volumes, length of contractual commitment, ordering patterns, inventory management and selling
prices. During the six
months ended July 2, 2010, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and St. Jude Medical
collectively accounted for 61% of our total sales.
- 25 -
Table of Contents
The initial term of our supply agreement with Boston Scientific pursuant to which Boston Scientific
purchases a certain percentage of the batteries, capacitors, filtered feedthroughs and case halves
it uses in its IMDs ends on December 31, 2010. The agreement may be renewed for one or more
four-year renewal terms upon mutual agreement of the parties. We are actively negotiating a
follow-on agreement with targeted completion during 2010.
In June 2010, we extended our feedthrough agreement with St. Jude Medical through 2017. Under the
terms of the agreement we are guaranteed 100% of St Jude Medicals feedthrough and filtering
business and 80% of their implantable pulse generator MRI filtered feedthrough business. This
agreement demonstrates the close working relationship we have with our customers and more
specifically, St. Jude Medical. Additionally, it is a testament to our quality and reliability as
we have been named the exclusive supplier of this key component to St. Jude Medicals devices.
Our Electrochem customers operate in the energy, security, portable medical and environmental
monitoring markets and include 3M, General Electric, Halliburton, Honeywell, Thales, Weatherford
and Zoll Medical.
Financial Overview
Sales for the second quarter of 2010 were $140.8 million compared to $134.7 million in the
comparable 2009 period. This 5% increase was primarily due to improvements in our vascular and
Electrochem markets, which were negatively impacted in the 2009 period by customer inventory
adjustments and a contraction in the underlying markets which have now begun to ease. For the first
half of 2010, sales of $273 million were consistent with the prior year period.
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States of America (GAAP). Additionally, we consistently report and discuss in our
quarterly earnings releases and investor presentations adjusted operating income and margin,
adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share. These adjusted amounts consist of
GAAP amounts excluding the following adjustments to the extent they occur during the period: (i)
acquisition-related charges; (ii) facility consolidation; manufacturing transfer and system
integration charges; (iii) asset write-down and disposition charges; (iv) litigation charges; (v)
the non-cash impact of accounting changes and (vi) the income tax (benefit) related to these
adjustments. We believe that reporting these amounts provides important supplemental information
to our investors and creditors seeking to understand the financial and business trends relating to
our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, performance-based compensation of
our executive management is determined utilizing these adjusted amounts.
GAAP operating income for the second quarter of 2010 was $17.3 million compared to $12.5 million
for the 2009 second quarter. Similarly, adjusted operating income was $17.8 million, or 12.7% of
sales, in the second quarter 2010, compared to $14.9 million, or 11.1% of sales, for the comparable
2009 period. The increase in GAAP and adjusted operating income from the prior year was primarily
due to higher revenue levels, as described above, partially offset by an increase in net research,
development and engineering costs (RD&E), which, as expected, were higher in the current year
period due to further investment in the development of new technologies, including systems level
projects, in order to create long-term growth opportunities. Additionally, operating income
benefited in the current period from a lower level of selling, general and administrative expenses
(SG&A) due to our various consolidation and cost cutting initiatives.
- 26 -
Table of Contents
For the first six months of 2010, GAAP operating income was higher than the prior year period
primarily
due to lower consolidation and integration charges as those projects were substantially completed
by the end of 2009. Adjusted operating income for the first six months of 2010 was consistent with
the prior year period, as a higher level of RD&E costs was offset by lower SG&A expenses primarily
due to the same reasons as discussed above.
A reconciliation of GAAP operating income to adjusted amounts is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Operating income as reported |
$ | 17,317 | $ | 12,469 | $ | 31,313 | $ | 27,268 | ||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidation costs |
536 | 1,578 | 856 | 3,477 | ||||||||||||
Integration expenses |
8 | 717 | 130 | 1,580 | ||||||||||||
Asset dispositions and other |
(49 | ) | 129 | 501 | 170 | |||||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 17,812 | $ | 14,893 | $ | 32,800 | $ | 32,495 | ||||||||
Adjusted operating margin |
12.7 | % | 11.1 | % | 12.0 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||||
This higher level of GAAP and adjusted operating income for the 2010 periods was offset by a higher
effective tax rate than the prior year periods due to the favorable impact of the resolution of tax
audits during the 2009 second quarter and the expiration of the U.S. R&D tax credit at the end of
2009. As a result, GAAP diluted earnings per share (EPS) was $0.57 per share for the first six
months of 2010 compared to $0.56 for the 2009 period. Similarly, adjusted diluted EPS was $0.71
for the first six months of 2010 versus $0.80 for the comparable 2009 period.
A reconciliation of GAAP net income and diluted EPS to adjusted amounts is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Income before taxes as reported |
$ | 11,981 | $ | 8,145 | $ | 20,515 | $ | 17,873 | ||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidation costs |
536 | 1,578 | 856 | 3,477 | ||||||||||||
Integration expenses |
8 | 717 | 130 | 1,580 | ||||||||||||
Asset dispositions and other |
(49 | ) | 129 | 501 | 170 | |||||||||||
CSN II conversion option discount amortization |
1,950 | 1,810 | 3,865 | 3,588 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted income before taxes |
14,426 | 12,379 | 25,867 | 26,688 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted provision for income taxes |
5,049 | 3,065 | 9,053 | 7,732 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted net income |
$ | 9,377 | $ | 9,314 | $ | 16,814 | $ | 18,956 | ||||||||
Adjusted diluted EPS |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||||
Number of shares |
23,926 | 23,855 | 23,946 | 23,900 |
- 27 -
Table of Contents
Cash flows from operations for the first six months of 2010 were $44.2 million compared to $21.7
million for the 2009 period. The increase from the prior year is primarily due to our strategic
initiatives designed to improve operational efficiency, as well as the timing of payments and lower
consolidation and integrations costs. A portion of these cash flows from operations were used to
repay the current portion of long-term debt of $30 million, which came due during the second
quarter of 2010. The Company currently expects that cash flow from operations for the remainder of
2010 will continue to be used to support routine capital expenditures and to further pay down debt
as we continue to take steps to strengthen our balance sheet in order to support future internal
growth.
Our CEOs View
Our revenue and operating results for the second quarter of 2010 reflect improvements across all of
our product lines, as well as continued benefits from our diversification strategy and our various
cost cutting initiatives. We were especially pleased with the growth we saw in our vascular and
Electrochem markets, which are recovering from the difficult market conditions of 2009. As we look
to the second half of the year, we remain on track to meet our previously stated guidance. With
that said, further sequential growth may prove to be challenging given our seasonally slow third
quarter, foreign currency headwinds, and that customers have stabilized their inventory levels.
Nevertheless, we continue to invest and take steps to deliver innovative solutions to our
customers, including the continued development of systems level projects, which will be critical to
our long-term growth and profitability. We remain confident in this strategy and continue to make
significant progress towards the completion of these initiatives.
Government Regulation
In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and
the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act (collectively Health Care Reform)
legislating broad-based changes to the U.S. health care system. Health Care Reform could
significantly impact our business operations and financial results, including higher or lower
revenue, as well as higher employee medical costs and taxes. Many significant parts of the
legislation will be phased in over the next eight years and require further guidance and
clarification in the form of regulations. As a result, many of the impacts of Health Care Reform
will not be known until those regulations are enacted, which we expect to occur over the next
several years.
Product Development
Currently, we are developing a series of new products for customer applications in the CRM, neuromodulation, vascular, orthopaedics and Electrochem markets. Some of the key development initiatives include:
Currently, we are developing a series of new products for customer applications in the CRM, neuromodulation, vascular, orthopaedics and Electrochem markets. Some of the key development initiatives include:
1. | To develop complete system solutions for our OEM customers in the markets we operate in; | ||
2. | To continue development of MRI compatible leadwires and other neuromodulation products; | ||
3. | To continue development of higher energy/higher density capacitors; | ||
4. | To integrate Biomimetic coating technology with our therapy delivery devices; | ||
5. | To complete the design of next generation steerable catheters, sheaths and introducers; | ||
6. | To further develop minimally invasive surgical techniques for the orthopaedics industry; | ||
7. | To develop disposable instrumentation for the orthopaedics industry; | ||
8. | To provide wireless sensing solutions to Electrochem customers; and | ||
9. | To develop a charging platform for Electrochems secondary offering. |
- 28 -
Table of Contents
As a result of the investments we have made over the last two years, we are now in a position to
provide our OEM customers with full system solutions. This includes providing comprehensive
products and services, from development and regulatory submissions through manufacturing and
supporting worldwide
distribution. These systems are niche product solutions that complement our OEM customers
products and utilize our expertise and capabilities. This strategy includes partnering with our
OEM customers, including sharing technology and resources, in order to bring these solutions to
market. The benefits to our OEM customers include shortening the time to market for these products
by accelerating the velocity of innovation, optimizing their supply chain and ultimately providing
them with cost efficiencies.
As previously disclosed, on March 15, 2010 Greatbatch Medical received clearance from the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration for its OptiSeal Valved PTFE Peelable Introducer. We have also received
approval in Canada and OptiSeal is CE marked for distribution in Europe. OptiSeal represents the
first 510(k) regulatory clearance received under the Greatbatch Medical brand and is a result of
the significant investments made over the last few years.
OptiSeal represents the type of niche system level products that we are trying to provide. That
is, products that are complementary to the core products of our customers and utilize our expertise
and capabilities. OptiSeal was developed in collaboration with our OEM customers, leverages our
technology and provides our customers with value-added innovative features.
We estimate that the market opportunity for the OptiSeal project is approximately $10 $20
million of annual revenue. Additionally, it provides us with an opportunity for expansion into the
vascular and peripheral access markets. In the second half of this year we expect to finalize
distribution agreements with our customers and OptiSeal will begin to provide a return on the R&D
investment we have made over the last two years.
We expect to be able to make additional product announcements later this year after 510(k)
regulatory clearance is received. The initial product announcements are expected to center around
systems we are developing for the vascular market but longer-term will include our CRM,
neuromodulation, Orthopaedics and Electrochem markets. Ultimately our goal is to establish a
cadence of system level product announcements similar to the OptiSeal Introducer program that will
help us achieve our stated goal of growing revenue faster than the underlying markets we serve.
Cost Savings and Consolidation Efforts
In the 2010 and 2009 periods we recorded charges in Other Operating Expenses, Net in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations related to cost savings and consolidation efforts initiated
in 2007 and 2008. These initiatives were undertaken to improve our operational efficiencies and
profitability. Additional information regarding the timing, cash flow and amount of future
expenditures is set forth in Note 8 Other Operating Expenses, Net of the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report.
Our Financial Results
We utilize a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest December 31st.
For 52-week years, each quarter contains 13 weeks. The second quarter of 2010 and 2009 ended on
July 2, and July 3, respectively. The commentary that follows should be read in conjunction with
our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes and with the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010.
- 29 -
Table of Contents
The following table presents certain selected financial information derived from our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for the periods presented (dollars in thousands, except per share
data):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | $ | % | July 2, | July 3, | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greatbatch Medical |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRM/Neuromodulation |
$ | 78,838 | $ | 78,026 | $ | 812 | 1 | % | $ | 155,763 | $ | 155,293 | $ | 470 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Vascular |
11,007 | 9,152 | 1,855 | 20 | % | 19,173 | 19,885 | (712 | ) | -4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Orthopaedics |
30,488 | 31,389 | (901 | ) | -3 | % | 59,929 | 65,472 | (5,543 | ) | -8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Greatbatch
Medical |
120,333 | 118,567 | 1,766 | 1 | % | 234,865 | 240,650 | (5,785 | ) | -2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Electrochem |
20,462 | 16,158 | 4,304 | 27 | % | 37,959 | 33,893 | 4,066 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total sales |
140,795 | 134,725 | 6,070 | 5 | % | 272,824 | 274,543 | (1,719 | ) | -1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
95,336 | 93,253 | 2,083 | 2 | % | 185,701 | 188,907 | (3,206 | ) | -2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
45,459 | 41,472 | 3,987 | 10 | % | 87,123 | 85,636 | 1,487 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit as a % of sales |
32.3 | % | 30.8 | % | 31.9 | % | 31.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (SG&A) |
16,470 | 17,885 | (1,415 | ) | -8 | % | 32,122 | 36,572 | (4,450 | ) | -12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
SG&A as a % of sales |
11.7 | % | 13.3 | % | 11.8 | % | 13.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research, development and
engineering costs, net (RD&E) |
11,177 | 8,694 | 2,483 | 29 | % | 22,201 | 16,569 | 5,632 | 34 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
RD&E as a % of sales |
7.9 | % | 6.5 | % | 8.1 | % | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses, net |
495 | 2,424 | (1,929 | ) | -80 | % | 1,487 | 5,227 | (3,740 | ) | -72 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
17,317 | 12,469 | 4,848 | 39 | % | 31,313 | 27,268 | 4,045 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating margin |
12.3 | % | 9.3 | % | 11.5 | % | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
5,139 | 4,930 | 209 | 4 | % | 10,287 | 9,819 | 468 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | NA | (5 | ) | (27 | ) | 22 | NA | |||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
200 | (604 | ) | 804 | NA | 516 | (397 | ) | 913 | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,193 | 1,583 | 2,610 | 165 | % | 7,180 | 4,647 | 2,533 | 55 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
35.0 | % | 19.4 | % | 35.0 | % | 26.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,788 | $ | 6,562 | $ | 1,226 | 19 | % | $ | 13,335 | $ | 13,226 | $ | 109 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net margin |
5.5 | % | 4.9 | % | 4.9 | % | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.05 | 18 | % | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.01 | 2 | % |
- 30 -
Table of Contents
Sales
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | % | July 2, | July 3, | % | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greatbatch Medical |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRM/Neuromodulation |
$ | 78,838 | $ | 78,026 | 1 | % | $ | 155,763 | $ | 155,293 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Vascular |
11,007 | 9,152 | 20 | % | 19,173 | 19,885 | -4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Orthopaedics |
30,488 | 31,389 | -3 | % | 59,929 | 65,472 | -8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Greatbatch
Medical |
120,333 | 118,567 | 1 | % | 234,865 | 240,650 | -2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Electrochem |
20,462 | 16,158 | 27 | % | 37,959 | 33,893 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total sales |
$ | 140,795 | $ | 134,725 | 5 | % | $ | 272,824 | $ | 274,543 | -1 | % | ||||||||||||
Greatbatch Medical CRM and neuromodulation sales for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010
remained consistent with the prior year periods as the benefit of further adoption of the Companys
Q series batteries, which empower new device features and reduce the overall size of medical
devices were offset by lower feedthrough sales as the 2009 periods included the benefit of customer
product launches.
Second quarter 2010 sales for the vascular product line increased 20% to $11.0 million, compared to
prior year sales of $9.2 million. This increase was primarily due to higher introducer and catheter
sales as customer inventory reduction programs, which began in 2009, are now complete and ordering
patterns have returned to a more normalized rate. Vascular sales for the first six months of 2010
were 4% below the prior year due to the customer inventory reduction programs mentioned above.
Orthopaedics product line sales of $30.5 million for the second quarter of 2010 were below the
$31.4 million for the comparable 2009 period and were negatively impacted by the decline in the
euro during the period. Excluding this foreign currency exchange differential, which reduced sales
by approximately $1.0 million, orthopaedics revenues were consistent with the prior year. For the
year-to-date period orthopaedics sales were 8% below the prior year period due to various customer
inventory reduction programs due to lower procedure volumes. However, the impact of these customer
inventory reduction initiatives and lower procedure volumes continued to ease during the quarter as
orthopaedics sales increased 4% over the sequential first quarter 2010 period. We expect
orthopaedics revenue to continue to be impacted by the lower euro exchange rate for the remainder
of 2010 and seasonal slow-downs in the third quarter. However these fluctuations are not expected
to materially impact our operating income.
Electrochem Second quarter 2010 sales for the Electrochem business segment were $20.5 million
compared to $16.2 million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase from the prior year primarily
related to the continued recovery in the energy and portable medical markets. The difficult market
conditions experienced in 2009 began to ease in the first quarter 2010 and the second quarter of
2010 saw a restocking of customer inventory, which is not expected to continue in the next two
quarters. These strong second quarter sales were also the main driver behind the 12% improvement in
Electrochem sales during the first half of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.
- 31 -
Table of Contents
2010 Sales Outlook At this time, we expect 2010 annual sales growth by product line to be as
follows:
| CRM & Neuromodulation | 2% to 5% | ||
| Vascular | 3% to 7% | ||
| Orthopaedics | 3% to 7% |
| Electrochem | 0% to 5% |
It is important to note that these annual sales growth rates are on a constant currency basis. As
previously discussed, we expect orthopaedics revenue to continue to be negatively impacted by the
lower euro foreign currency exchange rate for the remainder of 2010.
Gross Profit
Changes to gross profit as a percentage of sales from the prior year periods were primarily due to
the following:
Changes From Prior Year | ||||||||
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
Performance-based compensation(a) |
0.3 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||
Excess capacity(b) |
-3.5 | % | -2.6 | % | ||||
Selling price(c) |
-1.1 | % | -0.8 | % | ||||
Mix Change(d) |
5.0 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||
Other |
0.8 | % | -0.8 | % | ||||
Total percentage point change to gross
profit as a percentage of sales |
1.5 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||
(a) | Amount represents lower performance-based compensation in comparison to the prior year, which is recorded based upon the results of the current period. Performance-based compensation was higher in the second quarter of 2010 versus the sequential first quarter 2010 as revenue and operating results improved. For the remainder of 2010, performance-based compensation is expected to increase as operating results continue to improve. | |
(b) | Our gross profit percentage was negatively impacted from excess capacity costs driven by the lower volumes, primarily for the vascular and orthopaedics product lines, in comparison to the first half of 2009. In accordance with our inventory accounting policy, excess capacity costs are expensed. Excess capacity costs are expected to decrease as volumes improved in the second quarter of 2010. | |
(c) | Our gross profit percentage was negatively impacted due to contractual volume price reductions and price concessions made to our larger OEM customers on certain product lines. We expect this pricing pressure to continue in the future. | |
(d) | Our gross profit percentage was positively impacted from an increase in sales of higher margin products as a percentage of total sales, mainly in CRM and neuromodulation and Electrochem products for the first six months of 2010 and vascular products during the second quarter of 2010. |
We expect that our gross profit margin will continue around the second quarter 2010 level for the
remainder of the year as sequential sales volume growth is expected to be challenging as discussed
above. Over the long-term we expect our gross profit margin to improve as more system level
products are introduced, which typically earn a higher margin.
- 32 -
Table of Contents
SG&A Expenses
Changes to SG&A expenses from the prior year period were due to the following (in thousands):
Changes From Prior Year | ||||||||
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
Personnel costs(a) |
$ | 539 | $ | (1,384 | ) | |||
Litigation related fees and charges(b) |
(1,147 | ) | (1,031 | ) | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts(c) |
(474 | ) | (1,394 | ) | ||||
Other |
(333 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in SG&A |
$ | (1,415 | ) | $ | (4,450 | ) | ||
(a) | Amount represents the change in personnel costs from the 2009 period and includes the impact of performance-based compensation as well as our consolidation and cost cutting initiatives. Performance-based compensation varies based upon the results for the period and was higher in the second quarter of 2010 versus the sequential first quarter 2010 as revenue and operating results improved. For the remainder of 2010, performance-based compensation is expected to increase as operating results continue to improve. | |
(b) | Amounts represent the change in fees and charges incurred versus the 2009 period in connection with the patent infringement action filed by Pressure Products and the Electrochem Litigation discussed in Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report. | |
(c) | Amounts primarily relate to lower losses incurred on uncollectible receivables compared to the 2009 period, which included higher Electrochem and orthopaedics write-offs due to the economic slowdown. |
Throughout the remainder of 2010, we expect SG&A expenses to increase slightly from the current
levels due to normal inflationary cost increases, investment in sales and marketing and higher
performance-based compensation as our operating results improve.
RD&E Expenses, Net
Net RD&E costs are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Research and development costs |
$ | 4,426 | $ | 4,725 | $ | 8,954 | $ | 8,736 | ||||||||
Engineering costs |
8,804 | 6,333 | 16,817 | 12,779 | ||||||||||||
Less cost reimbursements |
(2,053 | ) | (2,364 | ) | (3,570 | ) | (4,946 | ) | ||||||||
Engineering costs, net |
6,751 | 3,969 | 13,247 | 7,833 | ||||||||||||
Total RD&E |
$ | 11,177 | $ | 8,694 | $ | 22,201 | $ | 16,569 | ||||||||
- 33 -
Table of Contents
As expected, net RD&E expenses for the first two quarters of 2010 were above the comparable 2009
period due to further investment in the development of new technologies, including the development
of systems level solutions. Additionally, during 2010 we received a lower level of customer cost
reimbursements. These cost reimbursements can vary significantly from period to period due to the
timing of the achievement of milestones on development projects. Excluding these customer cost
reimbursements, RD&E was 9.4% of sales for the first six months of 2010 compared to 7.8% of sales
in the comparable 2009 period. We anticipate that the higher level of RD&E investment will
continue for
the remainder of 2010 consistent with our long-term growth strategy. Our long-term growth strategy
includes investing resources in new technologies, including system level solutions for our
customers. This strategy also includes partnering with our OEM customers, including sharing
technology and resources, in order to bring these solutions to market. The benefits to our OEM
customers is that it will shorten their time to market by accelerating the velocity of innovation,
optimizing their supply chain and ultimately providing them with cost efficiencies. The timeline
for approval of our vascular market systems projects is shorter than for our other markets. As
such, we anticipate making additional announcements, similar to the OptiSealTM project
discussed in the Product Development section of this report, over the next several quarters.
Other Operating Expenses, Net
Other operating expenses, net is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 2, | July 3, | July 2, | July 3, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and
consolidations(a) |
$ | 536 | $ | 1,578 | $ | 856 | $ | 3,477 | ||||||||
Integration costs(b) |
8 | 717 | 130 | 1,580 | ||||||||||||
Asset dispositions and other(c) |
(49 | ) | 129 | 501 | 170 | |||||||||||
$ | 495 | $ | 2,424 | $ | 1,487 | $ | 5,227 | |||||||||
(a) | In the 2010 and 2009 periods, we recorded charges related to our various cost savings and consolidation efforts initiated in 2007 and 2008. Over the long-term, we expect these initiatives to improve our operational efficiencies and profitability. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a $0.6 million write down related to its Electrochem facility, as the estimated fair value less costs to sell was below the recorded book value. Additional information regarding the timing, cash flow and amount of future expenditures is discussed in Note 8 Other Operating Expenses, Net of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report. At this time, we have completed all of our publicly announced consolidation initiatives. However, we continually analyze our business to find ways to improve our operational efficiency and we expect to take additional steps to drive further improvements, particularly with respect to the optimization of our orthopaedics product line. During the current quarter, this optimization plan, which will be ongoing for the next several years, continued and was primarily focused on our Indianapolis, Indiana facility. | |
(b) | During the 2010 and 2009 periods, we incurred costs related to the integration of the companies acquired in 2007 and 2008. The integration initiatives include the implementation of the Oracle ERP system, training and compliance with policies, as well as the implementation of lean manufacturing and six sigma initiatives. The expenses are primarily for consultants, relocation and travel costs that will not be required after the integrations are completed. | |
(c) | During the 2010 and 2009 periods, we recorded write-downs in connection with various asset disposals. |
In 2010, consolidation and integration expenses are expected to be approximately $4 to $6 million.
- 34 -
Table of Contents
Interest Expense and Interest Income
Interest expense and interest income for the first two quarters of 2010 were consistent with the
same periods of 2009. Going forward, we expect interest expense to remain at current levels as the
benefit of paying down our long-term debt with excess cash flow from operations is expected to be
offset by increased discount amortization and interest expense associated with the Electrochem
Litigation appeal. See Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
Other (income) expense, net primarily includes the impact of foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations on transactions denominated in foreign currencies, which did not materially impact our
results in the first two quarters of 2010 or 2009. The Company generally does not expect foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations to have a material impact on its net income.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010 was 35.0% compared to 19.4%
and 26.0%, respectively, for the comparable 2009 periods. The current period rate reflects a tax
benefit from having operations outside the U.S., which are taxed at rates lower than the U.S.
statutory rate of 35%. This benefit was offset by the impact of non-deductible items and the
absence of the research and development tax credit, which expired at the end of 2009. The second
quarter 2009 tax rate also included the favorable impact of the resolution of tax audits. Pending
legislation would retroactively reinstate the R&D tax credit to the beginning of 2010. This
legislation, if enacted, would positively impact the effective tax rate in the period that it is
enacted.
We believe that it is reasonably possible that a reduction of approximately $0.7 million of the
balance of unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months as a result of the
expiration of applicable statutes of limitation, which would positively impact our effective tax
rate in the period of reduction.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of | ||||||||
July 2, | January 1, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents(a) |
$ | 45,657 | $ | 37,864 | ||||
Working capital(a) |
$ | 162,878 | $ | 119,926 | ||||
Current ratio(a) |
2.6 | 1.9 |
(a) | These increases primarily relate to the cash flow generated from operations of $44.2 million for the first half of 2010 partially offset by net expenditures for property, plant and equipment of $6.4 million. Additionally, our current ratio benefited from the $30.5 million payoff of the current portion of our long-term debt that came due during the second quarter of 2010. |
- 35 -
Table of Contents
Revolving Line of Credit We have a senior credit facility (the Credit Facility) consisting of a
$235 million revolving line of credit, which can be increased to $335 million upon our request and
approval by a majority of the lenders. The Credit Facility also contains a $15 million letter of
credit subfacility and a $15 million swingline subfacility. In connection with the Electrochem
Litigation, we were required to bond the amount of the judgment and statutory interest in order to
appeal. We satisfied this requirement by posting a bond, which required collateralization. We
received approval from the lenders supporting
our Credit Facility to increase the letter of credit subfacility by $35 million for use only in
connection with bonding the appeal of the Electrochem Litigation, of which $23 million was being
utilized as of July 2, 2010. The Credit Facility is secured by our non-realty assets including
cash, accounts and notes receivable, and inventories, and has an expiration date of May 22, 2012
with a one-time option to extend to April 1, 2013 at our option if no default has occurred.
The Credit Facility is supported by a consortium of six banks with no bank controlling more than
25% of the facility. As of July 2, 2010, each bank supporting the Credit Facility has an S&P
credit rating of at least BBB- or better, which is considered investment grade.
The Credit Facility requires us to maintain a ratio of adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the credit
agreement, to interest expense of at least 3.00 to 1.00. For the twelve month period ending July
2, 2010, our ratio of adjusted EBITDA to interest expense, calculated in accordance with our credit
agreement, was 9.3 to 1.00, well above the required limit. The Credit Facility also requires us to
maintain a total leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, of not greater than 4.50 to
1.00. As of July 2, 2010, our total leverage ratio, calculated in accordance with our credit
agreement, was 3.04 to 1.00, well below the required limit. The calculation of adjusted EBITDA and
leverage ratio exclude non-cash charges, as well as charges in connection with the Electrochem
Litigation up to a limit of $35 million.
The Credit Facility contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the
continuance of an event of default, a majority of the lenders may declare the outstanding advances
and all other obligations under the Credit Facility immediately due and payable. See Note 5 Debt
of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for a more detailed
description of the Credit Facility.
Based upon our current capital needs, we anticipate utilizing free cash flow (cash flow from
operations less capital expenditures) to make principal payments on our long-term debt. In July
2010, we made an additional $20 million payment on the outstanding balance under the Credit
Facility. As of July 2, 2010, we had $114 million of borrowing capacity available under the Credit
Facility. This amount may vary from period to period based upon our debt and EBITDA levels, which
impacts the covenant calculations. We believe that our cash flow from operations and the Credit
Facility provide adequate liquidity to meet our short- and long- term funding needs.
Operating activities Cash flows from operations for the first six months of 2010 were $44.2
million compared to $21.7 million for the comparable 2009 period. The increase from the prior year
is primarily due to our strategic initiatives designed to improve operational efficiency, as well
as the timing of payments and lower consolidation and integrations costs.
Investing activities Net cash used in investing activities for the first six months of 2010 were
$5.6 million and was primarily related to maintenance capital expenditures. Our current
expectation is that capital spending for the remainder of 2010 will be in the range of $10 million
to $20 million, of which approximately half is discretionary in nature. These purchases relate to
routine maintenance investments to support our internal growth, as well as additional investment in
our orthopaedics business in order to further drive operational efficiencies.
We anticipate that cash on hand along with cash flow from operations and availability under our
revolving line of credit will be sufficient to fund these capital expenditures. Going forward, we
will continue to consider strategically targeted and opportunistic acquisitions.
- 36 -
Table of Contents
Financing activities Net cash used in financing activities for the first six months of 2010 were
$30.5 million. As expected, during the second quarter of 2010 the holders of the remaining $30.5
million of CSN I notes exercised their put option. These notes were repaid with cash on hand.
Going forward, we expect excess cash flow to be used to pay down amounts outstanding under our
revolving line of credit and we made a $20 million principal payment in July 2010.
Capital Structure As of July 2, 2010, our capital structure consisted of $197.8 million of
convertible subordinated notes, $98.0 million of debt under our revolving line of credit and 23.2
million shares of common stock outstanding. Additionally, we had $45.7 million in cash and cash
equivalents, which is sufficient to meet our short-term operating cash needs. If necessary, we
have access to $114 million of borrowing capacity under our line of credit and are authorized to
issue up to 100 million shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock. The
market value of our outstanding common stock since our initial public offering has exceeded our
book value; accordingly, we believe that if needed we can access public markets to raise additional
capital. Our capital structure allows us to support our internal growth and provides liquidity for
corporate development initiatives. We continually assess our financing facilities and capital
structure to ensure liquidity and capital levels are sufficient to meet our strategic objectives.
In the future, we may adjust our capital structure as funding opportunities present themselves.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations at July 2, 2010:
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remainder of | ||||||||||||||||||||
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS | Total | 2010 | 2011 - 2012 | 2013 - 2014 | After 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Debt obligations(a) |
$ | 316,472 | $ | 4,150 | $ | 112,315 | $ | 200,007 | $ | | ||||||||||
Operating lease obligations(b) |
15,451 | 1,501 | 3,935 | 3,609 | 6,406 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations(b) |
10,437 | 10,178 | 259 | | | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts(b) |
4,500 | 4,500 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Pension obligations(c) |
10,632 | 412 | 1,975 | 2,272 | 5,973 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 357,492 | $ | 20,741 | $ | 118,484 | $ | 205,888 | $ | 12,379 | |||||||||||
(a) | Includes the annual interest expense on our convertible subordinated notes of 2.25%, which is paid semi-annually. Amounts also include the expected interest expense on the $98.0 million outstanding on our line of credit based upon the period end weighted average interest rate of 3.9%, which includes the impact of our interest rate swaps outstanding. See Note 5 Debt of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information about our debt obligations. | |
(b) | See Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information about our operating lease, purchase obligations and foreign currency contracts. |
- 37 -
Table of Contents
(c) | See Note 6 Pension Plans of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information about our pension plan obligations. These amounts do not include any potential future contributions to our pension plan that may be necessary if the rate of return earned on pension plan assets is not sufficient to fund the rate of increase of our pension liability. Future cash contributions may be required. As of January 1, 2010, the most recent valuation date, our actuarially determined pension benefit obligation exceeded the plans assets by $4.0 million. |
This table does not reflect $3.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits as we are uncertain as to if
or when such amounts may be settled. Refer to Note 9 Income Taxes of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information about these
unrecognized tax benefits. Additionally, the table does not include any potential payments that
may be due in connection with the Electrochem Litigation (See Note 10 Commitments and
Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this
report).
In an attempt to help offset the cost of rising health care expenses, beginning in 2010, we began
self-funding the medical insurance coverage for all of our U.S. based employees. Our risk is being
limited through the use of stop loss insurance which has deductibles in the amount of $0.2 million
per covered participant and $9.9 million in the aggregate per year. The maximum benefit for
aggregate losses is $1.0 million and $4.8 million for specific losses. As of July 2, 2010, we have
$2.2 million accrued related to the self-insurance of our medical plan, which is recorded as
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and is
not included in the contractual obligations table above.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In the normal course of business, we evaluate all new accounting pronouncements issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF), American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) or other
authoritative accounting body to determine the potential impact they may have on our Consolidated
Financial Statements. Based upon this review, we do not expect any of the recently issued
accounting pronouncements, which have not already been adopted, to have a material impact on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this report and other written and oral statements made from
time to time by us and our representatives are not statements of historical or current fact. As
such, they are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have
based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, which are subject to known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions. They include statements relating to:
| future sales, expenses and profitability; | ||
| the future development and expected growth of our business and the markets we operate in; |
| our ability to successfully execute our business model and our business strategy; | ||
| our ability to identify trends within the implantable medical devices, medical components, and Electrochem markets and to offer products and services that meet the changing needs of those markets; |
| projected capital expenditures; and |
| trends in government regulation, including the impact of Health Care Reform. |
- 38 -
Table of Contents
You can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should,
could, expects, intends, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts,
potential or continue or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These
statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially from those
suggested by these forward-looking statements. In evaluating these statements and our prospects
generally, you should carefully consider the factors set forth below. All forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by these cautionary factors and to others contained throughout this report. We are under
no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report or to conform
these statements to actual results.
Although it is not possible to create a comprehensive list of all factors that may cause actual
results to differ from the results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements or that
may affect our future results, some of these factors include the following: dependence upon a
limited number of customers, product obsolescence, inability to market current or future products,
pricing pressure from customers, reliance on third party suppliers for raw materials, products and
subcomponents, fluctuating operating results, inability to maintain high quality standards for our
products, challenges to our intellectual property rights, product liability claims, inability to
successfully consummate and integrate acquisitions, unsuccessful expansion into new markets,
competition, inability to obtain licenses to key technology, regulatory changes or consolidation in
the healthcare industry, and other risks and uncertainties that arise from time to time as
described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Foreign Currency We have significant foreign operations in France, Mexico and Switzerland, which
expose the Company to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations due to transactions denominated
in Euros, Pesos and Swiss Francs, respectively. We continuously evaluate our foreign currency risk
and will take action from time to time in order to best mitigate these risks, which includes the
use of various derivative instruments such as forward currency exchange contracts. See Note 10
Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this
report for additional information about our forward currency exchange contracts. A hypothetical
10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to our most significant foreign currency
exposures would have had an impact of approximately $8 million on our annual sales. This amount is
not indicative of the hypothetical net earnings impact due to partially offsetting impacts on cost
of sales and operating expenses in those currencies.
We translate all assets and liabilities of our foreign operations, where the U.S. dollar is not the
functional currency, at the period-end exchange rate and translate sales and expenses at the
average exchange rates in effect during the period. The net effect of these translation
adjustments is recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as Comprehensive Income
(Loss). The cumulative translation adjustment as of July 2, 2010 was a $0.3 million loss.
Translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to permanent investments
in our foreign subsidiaries. Net foreign currency transaction gains and losses included in Other
Expense, Net amounted to a loss of $0.5 million and gain of $0.5 million for the first six months
of 2010 and 2009, respectively. A hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar in
relation to our most significant foreign currency net assets would have had an impact of
approximately $9 million on our foreign net assets as of July 2, 2010.
- 39 -
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Swaps As of July 2, 2010, we had $98 million outstanding on our revolving line of
credit. Interest rates reset on this debt based upon the six-month LIBOR rate, thus subjecting us
to interest rate risk. During 2008, we entered into three receive floating-pay fixed interest rate
swaps indexed to the six-month LIBOR rate. The objective of these swaps is to hedge against
potential changes in cash flows on our outstanding revolving line of credit. No credit risk was
hedged. The receive variable leg of the swaps and the variable rate paid on the revolving line of
credit bear the same rate of interest, excluding the credit spread, and reset and pay interest on
the same dates. See Note 5 Debt of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in
this report for additional information about our interest rate swap contracts.
The estimated negative fair value of the interest rate swap contracts of $0.8 million as of July 2,
2010 represents the amount we would have to pay to terminate the contracts. No portion of the
change in fair value of the interest rate swaps during the 2010 or 2009 periods was considered
ineffective. The amount recorded as additional Interest Expense related to the interest rate swaps
for the second quarter of 2010 and 2009 was $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and $1.2
million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the six months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009.
Any change in the LIBOR interest rate would not have an impact on our interest expense relating to
the $98 million of floating rate revolving line of credit debt outstanding due to the interest rate
swap agreements we have in place.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) related to the recording, processing, summarization and
reporting of information in our reports that we file with the SEC as of July 2, 2010. These
disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable assurance that material
information relating to us, including our subsidiaries, is made known to our management, including
these officers, by other of our employees, and that this information is recorded, processed,
summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms. Based on their evaluation, as of July 2, 2010, our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
b. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
our last fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
- 40 -
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
With regard to the previously reported
patent infringement action filed by Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc.
(“Pressure Products”), in August 2010 the parties reached an
agreement to settle the litigation. In exchange for a cash payment by the
Company, Pressure Products will grant a covenant not to sue on the
Company’s FlowGuardTM and OptiSealTM introducer products
and dismiss its claims against the Company. No further material
litigation charges are anticipated with regards to this litigation as a result
of this settlement. As part of the settlement, the litigation commenced by the
Company against Pressure Products also will be dismissed.
The litigation previously reported in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
on January 1, 2010 commenced against the Company by its insurance carrier that had been paying the
cost of defense in the Electrochem Litigation has been settled. Under the terms of the settlement
agreement, the insurer has no further obligation to defend the Company, but the Company has no
obligation to reimburse the insurer for defense costs expended prior to the jury verdict.
Except as disclosed above, there have been no material developments in those legal proceedings
previously disclosed in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2010.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the Companys Form
10-K for the year ended January 1, 2010.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
See the Exhibit Index for a list of those exhibits filed herewith.
- 41 -
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 10, 2010 | GREATBATCH, INC. |
|||
By: | /s/ Thomas J. Hook | |||
Thomas J. Hook | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ Thomas J. Mazza | |||
Thomas J. Mazza | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ Marco F. Benedetti | |||
Marco F. Benedetti | ||||
Corporate Controller & Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2008). |
|||
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to our annual report on Form 10-K for the period
ended January 1, 2010). |
|||
31.1 | * | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. |
||
31.2 | * | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. |
||
32 | * | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* - | Filed herewith. |
- 42 -