Integer Holdings Corp - Quarter Report: 2011 July (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2011
Commission File Number 1-16137
GREATBATCH, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State of incorporation)
(State of incorporation)
16-1531026
(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
10000 Wehrle Drive
Clarence, New York
14031
(Address of principal executive offices)
Clarence, New York
14031
(Address of principal executive offices)
(716) 759-5600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the Companys common stock, $0.001 par value per share, as of
August 9, 2011 was: 23,420,552 shares.
Greatbatch, Inc.
Table of Contents for Form 10-Q
As of and for the Quarterly Period Ended July 1, 2011
Table of Contents for Form 10-Q
As of and for the Quarterly Period Ended July 1, 2011
- 2 -
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Unaudited
(in thousands except share and per share data)
As of | ||||||||
July 1, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 36,942 | $ | 22,883 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1.9 million in 2011 and $1.8 million in 2010 |
90,453 | 70,947 | ||||||
Inventories |
110,066 | 101,440 | ||||||
Refundable income taxes |
| 2,763 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,257 | 7,398 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
6,354 | 6,078 | ||||||
Total current assets |
251,072 | 211,509 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
146,399 | 146,380 | ||||||
Amortizing intangible assets, net |
78,753 | 75,114 | ||||||
Trademarks and tradenames |
20,288 | 20,288 | ||||||
Goodwill |
311,816 | 307,451 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,306 | 2,427 | ||||||
Other assets |
9,286 | 13,807 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 819,920 | $ | 776,976 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 34,768 | $ | 27,989 | ||||
Income taxes payable |
2,758 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
662 | 514 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
36,822 | 32,084 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
75,010 | 60,587 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
205,703 | 220,629 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
66,661 | 64,290 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
8,517 | 4,641 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
355,891 | 350,147 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000
shares; no shares issued or outstanding in 2011 or 2010 |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares;
23,417,950 shares issued and 23,373,266 shares outstanding in 2011
23,319,492 shares issued and 23,256,897 shares outstanding in 2010 |
23 | 23 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
303,006 | 298,405 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 44,684 shares in 2011 and 62,595 shares in 2010 |
(1,048 | ) | (1,469 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
139,894 | 119,400 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
22,154 | 10,470 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
464,029 | 426,829 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 819,920 | $ | 776,976 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Unaudited
(in thousands except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 146,524 | $ | 140,795 | $ | 295,358 | $ | 272,824 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
99,920 | 95,336 | 201,584 | 185,701 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
46,604 | 45,459 | 93,774 | 87,123 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
17,571 | 16,470 | 36,220 | 32,122 | ||||||||||||
Research, development and engineering costs, net |
11,250 | 11,177 | 21,638 | 22,201 | ||||||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net |
(520 | ) | 495 | (353 | ) | 1,487 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
28,301 | 28,142 | 57,505 | 55,810 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
18,303 | 17,317 | 36,269 | 31,313 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
4,403 | 5,139 | 8,677 | 10,287 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
| (3 | ) | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on cost method investments, net |
317 | | (4,232 | ) | | |||||||||||
Other expense, net |
819 | 200 | 1,241 | 516 | ||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
12,764 | 11,981 | 30,591 | 20,515 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,214 | 4,193 | 10,097 | 7,180 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,550 | $ | 7,788 | $ | 20,494 | $ | 13,335 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.57 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
23,227 | 23,058 | 23,214 | 23,051 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
23,838 | 23,926 | 23,767 | 23,946 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,550 | $ | 7,788 | $ | 20,494 | $ | 13,335 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) |
9,088 | (1,460 | ) | 11,303 | (4,654 | ) | ||||||||||
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of tax |
111 | 107 | 381 | 580 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 17,749 | $ | 6,435 | $ | 32,178 | $ | 9,261 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Unaudited
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 20,494 | $ | 13,335 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
23,593 | 23,446 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
5,795 | 2,765 | ||||||
Gain on cost method investments, net |
(4,232 | ) | | |||||
Other non-cash losses |
355 | 1,221 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,418 | 1,770 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(18,352 | ) | (6,649 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(5,713 | ) | 4,809 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
3 | 2,137 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
5,569 | (595 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses |
2,542 | (199 | ) | |||||
Income taxes payable |
5,338 | 2,185 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
37,810 | 44,225 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment |
(11,523 | ) | (6,416 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of cost method investments, net |
10,365 | | ||||||
Other investing activities |
(1,929 | ) | 821 | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,087 | ) | (5,595 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Principal payments of long-term debt |
(20,000 | ) | (30,450 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock |
1,968 | 640 | ||||||
Payment of debt issuance costs |
(2,114 | ) | | |||||
Other financing activities |
(1,102 | ) | (671 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(21,248 | ) | (30,481 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
584 | (356 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
14,059 | 7,793 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
22,883 | 37,864 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 36,942 | $ | 45,657 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 5 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Unaudited
(in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Treasury | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-In | Stock | Retained | Comprehensive | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Shares | Amount | Earnings | Income | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010 |
23,319 | $ | 23 | $ | 298,405 | (63 | ) | $ | (1,469 | ) | $ | 119,400 | $ | 10,470 | $ | 426,829 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 3,246 | | | | | 3,246 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net shares issued under stock incentive plans |
99 | | 1,473 | 18 | 421 | | | 1,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax liability from stock options,
restricted stock
and restricted
stock units |
| | (118 | ) | | | | | (118 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 20,494 | | 20,494 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
| | | | | | 11,684 | 11,684 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At July 1, 2011 |
23,418 | $ | 23 | $ | 303,006 | (45 | ) | $ | (1,048 | ) | $ | 139,894 | $ | 22,154 | $ | 464,029 | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information (Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 270, Interim Reporting)
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do
not include all of the information necessary for a fair presentation of financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). Operating results for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year as a whole.
In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the results of Greatbatch, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Greatbatch Ltd.
(collectively Greatbatch or the Company), for the periods presented. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales, expenses, and
related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. The December 31, 2010 condensed
consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited consolidated financial statements but
does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. For further information, refer to the
consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company utilizes a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal
year ending on the Friday nearest December 31st. For 52-week years, each quarter contains 13
weeks. The second quarter of 2011 and 2010 each contained 13 weeks and ended on July 1, and
July 2, respectively.
2. | SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities (in thousands): |
||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net |
$ | 381 | $ | 580 | ||||
Net change in property, plant and equipment
purchases included in accounts payable |
470 | 514 | ||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 3,327 | $ | 4,571 | ||||
Income taxes |
2,409 | 3,331 | ||||||
Acquisition of noncash assets |
$ | 3,125 | $ | 350 |
- 7 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
3. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
July 1, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 50,790 | $ | 45,974 | ||||
Work-in-process |
35,048 | 34,659 | ||||||
Finished goods |
24,228 | 20,807 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 110,066 | $ | 101,440 | ||||
4. | INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
Amortizing intangible assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Gross | Foreign | Net | ||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Currency | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Translation | Amount | |||||||||||||
At July 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchased
technology and patents |
$ | 89,273 | $ | (51,302 | ) | $ | 2,387 | $ | 40,358 | |||||||
Customer lists |
46,818 | (12,292 | ) | 3,350 | 37,876 | |||||||||||
Other |
3,519 | (3,074 | ) | 74 | 519 | |||||||||||
Total amortizing intangible assets |
$ | 139,610 | $ | (66,668 | ) | $ | 5,811 | $ | 78,753 | |||||||
At December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Purchased technology and patents |
$ | 83,023 | $ | (48,187 | ) | $ | 1,212 | $ | 36,048 | |||||||
Customer lists |
46,818 | (10,577 | ) | 2,119 | 38,360 | |||||||||||
Other |
3,519 | (2,862 | ) | 49 | 706 | |||||||||||
Total amortizing intangible assets |
$ | 133,360 | $ | (61,626 | ) | $ | 3,380 | $ | 75,114 | |||||||
Aggregate amortization expense for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was $2.6 million and $2.4
million, respectively. Aggregate amortization expense for the six months ended July 1,
2011 and July 2, 2010 was $5.1 million and $4.8 million, respectively. As of July 1, 2011,
annual amortization expense is estimated to be $5.3 million for the remainder of 2011,
$10.5 million for 2012, $9.6 million for 2013, $8.9 million for 2014 and $7.8 million for
2015. During 2011, the Company purchased technology and patents totaling $6.4 million,
which is being amortized over a weighted average period of approximately 11 years. In
connection with these purchases, the Company recorded a $3.0 million contingent liability,
which will only be paid if certain sales targets for products that utilize that technology
are achieved. This contingent liability is currently classified in Other Long-Term
Liabilities.
- 8 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The change in goodwill is as follows (in thousands):
Greatbatch | ||||||||||||
Medical | Electrochem | Total | ||||||||||
At December 31, 2010 |
$ | 297,508 | $ | 9,943 | $ | 307,451 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation |
4,365 | | 4,365 | |||||||||
At July 1, 2011 |
$ | 301,873 | $ | 9,943 | $ | 311,816 | ||||||
5. | DEBT |
Long-term debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):
July 1, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Revolving line of credit |
$ | 30,000 | $ | 50,000 | ||||
2.25% convertible subordinated notes, due 2013 |
197,782 | 197,782 | ||||||
Unamortized discount |
(22,079 | ) | (27,153 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 205,703 | $ | 220,629 | ||||
Revolving Line of Credit On June 24, 2011, the Company amended and extended its revolving
credit facility (the 2011 Credit Facility) to replace its existing credit facility, which had
an expiration date of May 22, 2012. The 2011 Credit Facility provides a $400 million secured
revolving credit facility, which can be increased to $600 million upon the Companys request and
approval by a majority of the lenders. The 2011 Credit Facility also contains a $15 million
letter of credit subfacility and a $15 million swingline subfacility. The 2011 Credit Facility
has a maturity date of June 24, 2016; provided, however, if CSN II (defined below) is not repaid
in full, modified or refinanced before March 1, 2013, the maturity date of the 2011 Credit
Facility will be March 1, 2013.
The 2011 Credit Facility is secured by the Companys non-realty assets including cash, accounts
receivable and inventories. Interest rates under the 2011 Credit Facility are, at the Companys
option either at: (i) the higher of (a) the prime rate and (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%,
plus the applicable margin, which ranges between 0.0% and 1.0%, based on the Companys total
leverage ratio or (ii) the applicable LIBOR rate divided by a number equal to 1.0 minus the
maximum aggregate Federal Reserve System Euro-currency Liabilities reserve requirement plus
the applicable margin, which ranges between 1.5% and 3.0%, based on the Companys total leverage
ratio. Loans under the swingline subfacility will bear interest at the higher of (a) the prime
rate and (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, plus the applicable margin, which ranges between
0.0% and 1.0%, based on the Companys total leverage ratio. The Company is also required to pay
a commitment fee which, varies between 0.175% and 0.25% depending on the Companys total
leverage ratio.
The 2011 Credit Facility contains limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness, liens and
licensing of intellectual property, investments and certain payments. The 2011 Credit Facility
permits the Company to: 1) engage in permitted acquisitions in the aggregate not to exceed $250
million; 2) make other investments in the aggregate not to exceed $60 million; 3) make stock
repurchases not to exceed $60 million in the aggregate; and 4) retire up to $198 million of
Greatbatch, Inc.s CSN II. At any time
that the total leverage ratio of the Company for the two most recently ended fiscal quarters is
less than 2.75 to 1.0, the Company may make an election to reset each of the amounts specified
in clauses (1) through (4) above. Additionally, these limitations can be waived upon the
Companys request and approval of a majority of the lenders. As of July 1, 2011, the Company had
available to it the full amount of the above limits.
- 9 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The 2011 Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain a rolling four quarter ratio of
adjusted EBITDA to interest expense of at least 3.0 to 1.0, and a total leverage ratio of not
greater than 4.5 to 1.0 through December 30, 2011 and not greater than 4.0 to 1.0 from December
31, 2011 and thereafter. The calculation of adjusted EBITDA and total leverage ratio excludes
non-cash charges, extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring expenses or losses, non-cash
stock-based compensation, and non-recurring expenses or charges incurred in connection with
permitted acquisitions. As of July 1, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
The 2011 Credit Facility contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and during
the continuance of an event of default, a majority of the lenders may declare the outstanding
advances and all other obligations under the 2011 Credit Facility immediately due and payable.
The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the 2011 Credit Facility as of July 1,
2011, was 3.5%. As of July 1, 2011, the Company had $370 million of borrowing capacity
available under the 2011 Credit Facility. This amount may vary from period to period based upon
the debt levels of the Company as well as the level of EBITDA, which impacts the covenant
calculations described above.
Interest Rate Swaps In 2008, the Company entered into three receive floating-pay fixed
interest rate swaps indexed to the six-month LIBOR rate, in order to hedge against potential
changes in cash flows on the Companys outstanding debt, which was also indexed to the six-month
LIBOR rate. As of July 1, 2011, none of these interest rate swaps remain outstanding. The
receive variable leg of the interest rate swaps and the variable rate paid on the debt had the
same rate of interest, excluding the credit spread, and reset and paid interest on the same
dates. No portion of the change in fair value of the interest rate swaps during the 2011 or
2010 periods was considered ineffective. The amount recorded as Interest Expense related to the
interest rate swaps for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was $0.2 million and $0.6 million,
respectively, and $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the six months ended July 1,
2011 and July 2, 2010.
Convertible Subordinated Notes In May 2003, the Company completed a private placement of $170
million of 2.25% convertible subordinated notes, due June 15, 2013 (CSN I). In March 2007,
the Company entered into separate, privately negotiated agreements to exchange $117.8 million of
CSN I for an equivalent principal amount of a new series of 2.25% convertible subordinated notes
due 2013 (CSN II) (collectively the Exchange) at a 5% discount. The primary purpose of the
Exchange was to eliminate the June 15, 2010 call and put option that was included in the terms
of CSN I. In connection with the Exchange, the Company issued an additional $80 million
aggregate principal amount of CSN II.
CSN II bear interest at 2.25% per annum, payable semi-annually, and are due on June 15, 2013.
The holders may convert the notes into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion
price of $34.70 per share, which is equivalent to a conversion ratio of 28.8219 shares per
$1,000 of principal.
The conversion price and the conversion ratio will adjust automatically upon certain changes to
the Companys capitalization. The fair value of CSN II as of July 1, 2011 was approximately $200
million and is based on recent sales prices.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The effective interest rate of CSN II, which takes into consideration the amortization of the
discount and deferred fees related to the issuance of these notes, is 8.5%. The discount on CSN
II is being amortized to the maturity date of the convertible notes utilizing the effective
interest method. As of July 1, 2011, the carrying amount of the discount related to the CSN II
conversion option value was $18.7 million. As of July 1, 2011, the if-converted value of the
CSN II notes does not exceed their principal amount as the Companys closing stock price of
$27.23 per share did not exceed the conversion price of $34.70 per share.
The contractual interest and discount amortization for CSN II were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Contractual interest |
$ | 1,113 | $ | 1,113 | $ | 2,225 | $ | 2,225 | ||||||||
Discount amortization |
2,558 | 2,394 | 5,074 | 4,748 |
The notes are convertible at the option of the holders at such time as: (i) the closing price of
the Companys common stock exceeds 150% of the conversion price of the notes for 20 out of 30
consecutive trading days; (ii) the trading price per $1,000 of principal is less than 98% of the
product of the closing sale price of common stock for each day during any five consecutive
trading day period and the conversion rate per $1,000 of principal; (iii) the notes have been
called for redemption; (iv) the Company distributes to all holders of common stock rights or
warrants entitling them to purchase additional shares of common stock at less than the average
closing price of common stock for the ten trading days immediately preceding the announcement of
the distribution; (v) the Company distributes to all holders of common stock any form of
dividend which has a per share value exceeding 5% of the price of the common stock on the day
prior to such date of distribution; (vi) the Company effects a consolidation, merger, share
exchange or sale of assets pursuant to which its common stock is converted to cash or other
property; (vii) the period beginning 60 days prior to but excluding June 15, 2013; and (viii)
certain fundamental changes, as defined in the indenture governing the notes, occur or are
approved by the Board of Directors.
Conversions in connection with corporate transactions that constitute a fundamental change
require the Company to pay a premium make-whole amount, based upon a predetermined table as set
forth in the indenture agreement, whereby the conversion ratio on the notes may be increased by
up to 7.0 shares per $1,000 of principal. The premium make-whole amount will be paid in shares
of common stock upon any such conversion, subject to the net share settlement feature of the
notes described below.
CSN II contains a net share settlement feature that requires the Company to pay cash for each
$1,000 of principal to be converted. Any amounts in excess of $1,000 will be settled in shares
of the Companys common stock, or at the Companys option, cash. The Company has a one-time
irrevocable election to pay the holders in shares of its common stock, which it currently does
not plan to exercise.
- 11 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
CSN II are redeemable by the Company at any time on or after June 20, 2012, or at the option of
a holder upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes, as defined in the indenture,
affecting the Company. The notes are subordinated in right of payment to all of our senior
indebtedness and effectively subordinated to all debts and other liabilities of the Companys
subsidiaries.
Deferred Financing Fees - The change in deferred financing fees is as follows (in thousands):
At December 31, 2010 |
$ | 2,005 | ||
Financing costs deferred |
2,164 | |||
Write-off during the period |
(51 | ) | ||
Amortization during the period |
(488 | ) | ||
At July 1, 2011 |
$ | 3,630 | ||
6. | PENSION PLANS |
The Company is required to provide its employees located in Switzerland and France certain
defined pension benefits. These benefits accrue to employees based upon years of service,
position, age and compensation. The defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits to the
Companys employees located in Switzerland is a funded contributory plan while the pension plan
that provides benefits to the Companys employees located in France is unfunded and
noncontributory. The liability and corresponding expense related to these pension plans is
based on actuarial computations of current and future benefits for employees. Pension expense
is charged to current operating expenses.
The change in net pension liability is as follows (in thousands):
At December 31, 2010 |
$ | 4,647 | ||
Net periodic pension cost |
576 | |||
Benefit payments |
(531 | ) | ||
Foreign currency translation |
462 | |||
At July 1, 2011 |
$ | 5,154 | ||
Net pension cost is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 278 | $ | 229 | $ | 535 | $ | 469 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
120 | 100 | 231 | 206 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss and
prior service cost |
20 | 6 | 39 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(119 | ) | (102 | ) | (229 | ) | (208 | ) | ||||||||
Net pension cost |
$ | 299 | $ | 233 | $ | 576 | $ | 478 | ||||||||
- 12 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
7. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
Compensation costs related to share-based payments for the three months ended July 1, 2011 and
July 2, 2010 totaled $1.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Of these amounts $1.4 million
and $1.4 million, respectively, are included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
Compensation costs related to share-based payments for the six months ended July 1, 2011 and
July 2, 2010 totaled $3.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Of these amounts $2.7 million
and $2.4 million, respectively, are included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
Stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
includes costs recognized for the annual share contribution to the Companys 401(k) plan of $1.3
million and $0.0 million for the three months ended July 1, 2011 and July 2, 2010, respectively.
Stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
for the annual share contribution to the Companys 401(k) plan for the six months ended July 1,
2011 and July 2, 2010 totaled $2.5 million and $0.0 million, respectively.
The weighted average fair value and assumptions used to value options granted are as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Weighted average fair value |
$ | 9.42 | $ | 8.24 | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.04 | % | 2.62 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
40 | % | 40 | % | ||||
Expected life (in years) |
5 | 5 | ||||||
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % |
The following table summarizes time-vested stock option activity:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Weighted | Remaining | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
Time-Vested | Average | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Stock | Exercise | Life | Value | |||||||||||||
Options | Price | (In Years) | (In Millions) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
1,463,556 | $ | 23.46 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
292,959 | 24.15 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(64,302 | ) | 21.35 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(54,010 | ) | 23.28 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at July 1, 2011 |
1,638,203 | $ | 23.67 | 6.5 | $ | 6.8 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at July 1, 2011 |
1,108,118 | $ | 23.55 | 5.4 | $ | 4.7 | ||||||||||
- 13 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The following table summarizes performance-vested stock option activity:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Weighted | Remaining | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
Performance- | Average | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Vested Stock | Exercise | Life | Value | |||||||||||||
Options | Price | (In Years) | (In Millions) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
744,523 | $ | 23.68 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(25,194 | ) | 22.56 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(216,501 | ) | 22.08 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at July 1, 2011 |
502,828 | $ | 24.42 | 6.4 | $ | 1.4 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at July 1, 2011 |
272,370 | $ | 22.64 | 5.5 | $ | 1.2 | ||||||||||
The following table summarizes time-vested restricted stock and unit activity:
Weighted | ||||||||
Time-Vested | Average | |||||||
Activity | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2010 |
123,386 | $ | 22.57 | |||||
Granted |
21,114 | 24.15 | ||||||
Vested |
(7,993 | ) | 21.98 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
(1,750 | ) | 23.96 | |||||
Nonvested at July 1, 2011 |
134,757 | $ | 22.83 | |||||
The following table summarizes performance-vested restricted stock and unit activity:
Performance- | Weighted | |||||||
Vested | Average | |||||||
Activity | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2010 |
283,797 | $ | 15.10 | |||||
Granted |
279,415 | 18.21 | ||||||
Vested |
(200 | ) | 18.47 | |||||
Nonvested at July 1, 2011 |
563,012 | $ | 16.64 | |||||
The performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2011 only vest if certain market-based
performance metrics are achieved. The amount of shares that ultimately vest range from 0 shares
to 279,415 shares based upon the total shareholder return of the Company relative to the
Companys compensation peer group, as disclosed in the Companys definitive proxy statement
filed on April 15, 2011, over a three year performance period beginning in the year of grant.
The fair value of the restricted stock units was determined by utilizing a Monte Carlo
simulation model, which projects the value of Greatbatch stock versus the peer group under
numerous scenarios and determines the value of the award based upon the present value of these
projected outcomes.
- 14 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
On May 17, 2011, stockholders of the Company approved the Greatbatch, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive
Plan (the 2011 Plan). The 2011 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares
underlying equity incentive awards including nonqualified and incentive stock options,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock bonuses and stock appreciation rights, subject
to the terms of the 2011 Plan.
8. | OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET |
Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Orthopaedic facility optimization(a) |
$ | 22 | $ | | $ | 261 | $ | | ||||||||
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and
consolidations(b) |
| 536 | | 856 | ||||||||||||
Integration costs(c) |
| 8 | | 130 | ||||||||||||
Asset dispositions and other(d) |
(542 | ) | (49 | ) | (614 | ) | 501 | |||||||||
$ | (520 | ) | $ | 495 | $ | (353 | ) | $ | 1,487 | |||||||
(a)
Orthopaedic facility optimization. In the third quarter of 2010, the Company began updating
its Indianapolis, IN facility to streamline operations, consolidate two buildings, increase
capacity, further expand capabilities and reduce dependence on outside suppliers. Ultimately
these updates will further reduce lead times, improve quality and allow the Company to better
meet the needs of its customers. Total capital investment in this facility was approximately $5
million and was completed in the second quarter of 2011.
In the first quarter of 2011, the Company announced that it would construct an 80,000 square
foot manufacturing facility in Allen County, IN and transfer the manufacturing operations
currently being performed at its Columbia City, IN location into this new facility. Total
investment is expected to be approximately $17 million. The Company broke ground on this new
facility in the second quarter of 2011 and is expected to be completed by mid-2012.
The total expense for these optimization projects is expected to be approximately $2 million of
which $0.5 million has been incurred to date. All expenses are cash expenditures, except
accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs and are recorded within the Greatbatch Medical
segment.
- 15 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
The change in accrued liabilities related to the orthopaedic facility optimization is as follows
(in thousands):
Production | Accelerated | |||||||||||||||||||
Severance | Inefficiencies, | Depreciation/ | ||||||||||||||||||
and | Moving and | Asset Write- | ||||||||||||||||||
Retention | Revalidation | offs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 249 | 2 | 10 | 261 | |||||||||||||||
Write-offs |
| | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash payments |
| (249 | ) | | (10 | ) | (259 | ) | ||||||||||||
At July 1, 2011 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
(b)
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations. From 2007 to 2010, the Company completed
the following facility shutdowns and consolidation initiatives:
| Consolidated its Electrochem manufacturing facilities in Canton, MA, Teterboro, NJ and Suzhou, China, into a newly constructed facility in Raynham, MA; | ||
| Consolidated its corporate offices in Clarence, NY into its technology center also in Clarence, NY; | ||
| Reorganized and consolidated various general and administrative and research and development functions throughout the organization in order to optimize those resources with the businesses it acquired in 2007 and 2008; | ||
| Consolidated its Orchard Park, NY (Electrochem manufacturing), Exton, PA (Orthopaedic corporate office) and Saignelegier, Switzerland (Orthopaedic manufacturing) facilities into existing facilities that had excess capacity; and | ||
| Consolidated its manufacturing operations in Blaine, MN into its Plymouth, MN facility. |
The total expenses incurred for these facility shutdowns and consolidations was $17.3 million
and included the following:
| Severance and retention $4.4 million; | ||
| Production inefficiencies, moving and revalidation $5.2 million; | ||
| Accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs $5.3 million; | ||
| Personnel $0.7 million; and | ||
| Other $1.7 million. |
All categories of expenses were cash expenditures, except accelerated depreciation and asset
write-offs. Costs incurred during 2010 primarily related to the Electrochem Solutions business
segment.
(c)
Integration costs. During 2010, the Company incurred costs related to the integration of
the companies acquired in 2007 and 2008. The integration initiatives include the implementation
of the Oracle ERP system, training and compliance with Company policies, as well as the
implementation of lean manufacturing and six sigma initiatives. These expenses were primarily
for consultants, relocation and travel costs.
(d)
Asset dispositions and other. During 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded (gains)
write-downs in connection with various asset disposals, net of insurance proceeds received, if
any.
- 16 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
9. | INCOME TAXES |
The income tax provision for interim periods is determined using an estimate of the annual
effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken into account in the
relevant period. Each quarter, the estimate of the annual effective tax rate is updated, and if
the estimated effective tax rate changes, a cumulative adjustment is made. There is a potential
for volatility of the effective tax rate due to several factors, including changes in the mix of
the pre-tax income and the jurisdictions to which it relates, business acquisitions, settlements
with taxing authorities and foreign currency fluctuations.
During the second quarter of 2011, there was no change in the balance of unrecognized tax
benefits. Approximately $1.8 million of the balance of unrecognized tax benefits would
favorably impact the effective tax rate, net of federal benefit on state issues, if recognized.
It is reasonably possible that a reduction of up to $1.0 million of the balance of unrecognized
tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months as a result of the expiration of applicable
statutes of limitation.
10. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Litigation The Company is a party to various legal actions arising in the normal course of
business. While the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of any such pending
actions will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position, or
cash flows, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to
occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact in the period in which the
ruling occurs.
Product Warranties The Company generally warrants that its products will meet customer
specifications and will be free from defects in materials and workmanship. The Company accrues
its estimated exposure to warranty claims based upon recent historical experience and other
specific information as it becomes available.
The change in aggregate product warranty liability for the quarter is as follows (in thousands):
At April 1, 2011 |
$ | 2,238 | ||
Additions to warranty reserve |
88 | |||
Warranty claims paid |
(184 | ) | ||
Foreign currency effect |
31 | |||
At July 1, 2011 |
$ | 2,173 | ||
- 17 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Purchase Commitments Contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as
agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on the Company and that specify all
significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or
variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Our purchase orders
are normally based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within
short time horizons. We enter into blanket orders with vendors that have preferred pricing and
terms, however these orders are normally cancelable by us without penalty. As of July 1, 2011,
the total contractual obligation related to such expenditures is approximately $32.4 million and
will primarily be financed by existing cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from
operations, or the 2011 Credit Facility over the next twelve months. We also enter into
contracts for outsourced services; however, the obligations under these contracts were not
significant and the contracts generally contain clauses allowing for cancellation without
significant penalty.
Operating Leases The Company is a party to various operating lease agreements for buildings,
equipment and software. Minimum future annual operating lease payments are $1.3 million for the
remainder of 2011; $2.4 million in 2012; $2.1 million in 2013; $2.2 million in 2014; $1.8
million in 2015 and $4.7 million thereafter. The Company primarily leases buildings, which
accounts for the majority of the future lease payments.
Foreign Currency Contracts In December 2009 and February 2010, the Company entered into
forward contracts to purchase 6.6 million and 3.3 million, respectively, Mexican pesos per month
through December 2010 at an exchange rate of 13.159 pesos and 13.1595 pesos per one U.S. dollar,
respectively. These contracts were entered into in order to hedge the risk of peso-denominated
payments associated with the operations at the Companys Tijuana, Mexico facility for 2010 and
were accounted for as cash flow hedges.
In July 2010 and February 2011, the Company entered into forward contracts to purchase 6.6
million and 3.7 million, respectively, Mexican pesos per month through December 2011 at an
exchange rate of 13.2231 pesos and 12.2761 pesos per one U.S. dollar, respectively. These
contracts were entered into in order to hedge the risk of peso-denominated payments associated
with a portion of the operations at the Companys Tijuana, Mexico facility for 2011 and are
being accounted for as cash flow hedges.
As of July 1, 2011, these contracts had a positive fair value of $0.5 million, which is recorded
within Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The amount recorded as a reduction of Cost of Sales during the six months ended July 1, 2011 and
July 2, 2010 related to these forward contracts was $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
No portion of the change in fair value of the Companys foreign currency contracts during the
six months ended July 1, 2011 or July 2, 2010 was considered ineffective.
Self-Insured Medical Plan The Company self-funds the medical insurance coverage provided to
its U.S. based employees. The risk to the Company is being limited through the use of stop loss
insurance, which has an annual deductible of $0.2 million per covered participant. The maximum
aggregate loss (the sum of all claims under the $0.2 million deductible) is limited to $14.2
million with a maximum benefit of $1.0 million. As of July 1, 2011, the Company has $3.7 million
accrued related to the self-insurance of its medical plan, which is recorded in Accrued Expenses
in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, and is primarily based upon claim history.
- 18 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Workers Compensation Trust The Company is a member of a group self-insurance trust that
provides workers compensation benefits to employees of the Company in Western New York. Based
on actual experience, the Company could receive a refund or be assessed additional contributions
for workers compensation claims. No amounts have been recorded for any refund or additional
assessment. Under the trust agreement, each participating organization has joint and several
liability for trust obligations if the assets of the trust are not sufficient to cover those
obligations. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company decided to terminate its membership
in the self-insurance trust and, beginning in 2012, will utilize traditional insurance to
provide workers compensation benefits.
11. | EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS) |
The following table illustrates the calculation of Basic and Diluted EPS (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Numerator for basic EPS: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,550 | $ | 7,788 | $ | 20,494 | $ | 13,335 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on CSN I and
related deferred
financing fees, net
of tax |
| 111 | | 241 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for diluted EPS |
$ | 8,550 | $ | 7,899 | $ | 20,494 | $ | 13,576 | ||||||||
Denominator for basic EPS: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
23,227 | 23,058 | 23,214 | 23,051 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Convertible subordinated notes |
| 630 | | 693 | ||||||||||||
Stock options, restricted stock and
restricted stock units |
611 | 238 | 553 | 202 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted EPS |
23,838 | 23,926 | 23,767 | 23,946 | ||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.57 | ||||||||
The diluted weighted average share calculations do not include the following securities, which are
not dilutive to the EPS calculations or the performance criteria have not been met:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Time-vested stock options, restricted
stock and restricted stock units |
558,000 | 1,118,000 | 671,000 | 1,372,000 | ||||||||||||
Performance-vested stock options and
restricted stock units |
578,000 | 942,000 | 596,000 | 956,000 |
- 19 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
12. | COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
The Companys comprehensive income as reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income includes net income, foreign currency translation gain
(loss), and the net change in cash flow hedges, net of tax.
The Company translates all assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiaries, where the U.S.
dollar is not the functional currency, at the period-end exchange rate and translates income and
expenses at the average exchange rates in effect during the period. The net effect of these
translation adjustments is recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements as
comprehensive income (loss). Translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they
relate to permanent investments in the Companys foreign subsidiaries.
The Company has designated its interest rate swaps and foreign currency contracts (See Note 5
Debt and Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies) as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the
effective portion of any change in the fair value of these instruments is recorded in
comprehensive income, net of tax, and reclassified into earnings (Interest Expense swaps,
Cost of Sales foreign currency contracts) in the same period or periods during which the
hedged transaction affects earnings.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Defined | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit | Foreign | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension | Cash | Currency | Total | Net-of- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Plan | Flow | Translation | Pre-Tax | Tax | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liability | Hedges | Adjustment | Amount | Tax | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010 |
$ | (2,014 | ) | $ | (121 | ) | $ | 12,230 | $ | 10,095 | $ | 375 | $ | 10,470 | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges |
| 460 | | 460 | (161 | ) | 299 | |||||||||||||||||
Realized loss on cash flow hedges |
| 126 | | 126 | (44 | ) | 82 | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation gain |
| | 11,303 | 11,303 | | 11,303 | ||||||||||||||||||
At July 1, 2011 |
$ | (2,014 | ) | $ | 465 | $ | 23,533 | $ | 21,984 | $ | 170 | $ | 22,154 | |||||||||||
- 20 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
13. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
The following table provides information regarding assets and liabilities recorded at fair value
in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 1, 2011 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | ||||||||||||||||
Prices in | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
At | for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
July 1, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
$ | 464 | $ | | $ | 464 | $ | |
Foreign currency contracts The fair value of foreign currency contracts are determined
through the use of cash flow models that utilize observable market data inputs to estimate fair
value. These observable market data inputs include foreign exchange rate and credit spread
curves. In addition to the above, the Company receives fair value estimates from the foreign
currency contract counterparty to verify the reasonableness of the Companys estimates. The
Companys foreign currency contracts are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Convertible subordinated notes The fair value of the Companys convertible
subordinated notes disclosed in Note 5 Debt was determined based upon recent third-party
transactions for the Companys notes in an inactive market. The Companys convertible
subordinated notes are valued for disclosure purposes utilizing Level 2 measurements of the fair
value hierarchy.
Cost method investments The Company holds certain cost method investments that are
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition.
The fair value of a cost method investment is only estimated if there are identified events or
changes in circumstances that indicate impairment may be present. The aggregate carrying amount
of the Companys cost method investments included in Other Assets was $5.6 million and $11.8
million as of July 1, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. During the second quarter of
2011, the Company recorded a $0.3 million write-down of one of its cost method investments based
upon a recent stock offering by that Company. This investment now has a $0 book value. On
January 5, 2011, the Company sold its cost method investment in IntElect Medical, Inc.
(IntElect) in conjunction with Boston Scientifics acquisition of IntElect. This transaction
resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4.5 million ($3.0 million net of tax).
- 21 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
14. | BUSINESS SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHIC AND CONCENTRATION RISK INFORMATION |
The Company operates its business in two reportable segments Greatbatch Medical and
Electrochem Solutions (Electrochem). The Greatbatch Medical segment designs and manufactures
medical devices and components for the cardiac rhythm management (CRM), neuromodulation,
vascular access and orthopaedic markets. Additionally, Greatbatch Medical offers value-added
assembly and design engineering services for products that incorporate Greatbatch Medical
components. As a result of the strategy put in place over three years ago, Greatbatch Medical
now offers its customers complete medical devices including design, development, manufacturing,
regulatory submission and supporting worldwide distribution. This medical device strategy is
being facilitated through the QiG Group and leverages the component technology of Greatbatch
Medical and Electrochem in the Companys core markets: cardiovascular, neuromodulation and
orthopaedic.
Electrochem designs, manufactures and distributes primary and rechargeable batteries, battery
packs and wireless sensors for demanding applications in markets such as energy, security,
portable medical, environmental monitoring and more.
The Company defines segment income from operations as sales less cost of sales including
amortization and expenses attributable to segment-specific selling, general and administrative,
research, development and engineering expenses, and other operating expenses. Segment income
also includes a portion of non-segment specific selling, general and administrative expenses
based on allocations appropriate to the expense categories. The remaining unallocated operating
and other expenses are primarily administrative corporate headquarters expenses and capital
costs that are not allocated to reportable segments. Transactions between the two segments are
not significant. An analysis and reconciliation of the Companys business segment, product line
and geographic information to the respective information in the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements follows. Sales by geographic area are presented by allocating sales from external
customers based on where the products are shipped to (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Greatbatch Medical |
||||||||||||||||
CRM/Neuromodulation |
$ | 77,724 | $ | 78,838 | $ | 155,761 | $ | 155,763 | ||||||||
Vascular Access |
10,769 | 11,007 | 21,243 | 19,173 | ||||||||||||
Orthopaedic |
37,922 | 30,488 | 77,511 | 59,929 | ||||||||||||
Total Greatbatch Medical |
126,415 | 120,333 | 254,515 | 234,865 | ||||||||||||
Electrochem |
20,109 | 20,462 | 40,843 | 37,959 | ||||||||||||
Total sales |
$ | 146,524 | $ | 140,795 | $ | 295,358 | $ | 272,824 | ||||||||
- 22 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Segment income from operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Greatbatch Medical |
$ | 17,700 | $ | 18,183 | $ | 36,647 | $ | 32,213 | ||||||||
Electrochem |
4,852 | 3,331 | 9,259 | 7,084 | ||||||||||||
Total segment income from operations |
22,552 | 21,514 | 45,906 | 39,297 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated operating expenses |
(4,249 | ) | (4,197 | ) | (9,637 | ) | (7,984 | ) | ||||||||
Operating income as reported |
18,303 | 17,317 | 36,269 | 31,313 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated other expense |
(5,539 | ) | (5,336 | ) | (5,678 | ) | (10,798 | ) | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
$ | 12,764 | $ | 11,981 | $ | 30,591 | $ | 20,515 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Sales by geographic area: |
||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 61,092 | $ | 67,170 | $ | 126,293 | $ | 125,389 | ||||||||
Non-Domestic locations: |
||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico |
24,651 | 23,533 | 50,832 | 46,136 | ||||||||||||
Belgium |
17,628 | 14,528 | 36,597 | 30,713 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom & Ireland |
17,626 | 11,421 | 28,119 | 25,049 | ||||||||||||
Rest of world |
25,527 | 24,143 | 53,517 | 45,537 | ||||||||||||
Total sales |
$ | 146,524 | $ | 140,795 | $ | 295,358 | $ | 272,824 | ||||||||
Four customers accounted for a significant portion of the Companys sales as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Customer A |
19 | % | 22 | % | 20 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||
Customer B |
17 | % | 19 | % | 17 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||
Customer C |
14 | % | 11 | % | 14 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||
Customer D |
8 | % | 7 | % | 8 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||
58 | % | 59 | % | 59 | % | 61 | % | |||||||||
- 23 -
Table of Contents
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Long-lived tangible assets by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
July 1, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
United States |
$ | 120,822 | $ | 126,519 | ||||
Rest of world |
37,169 | 36,095 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 157,991 | $ | 162,614 | ||||
15. | IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
In the normal course of business, management evaluates all new accounting pronouncements issued
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Securities and Exchange Commission,
Emerging Issues Task Force, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants or other
authoritative accounting bodies to determine the potential impact they may have on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Based upon this review, except as noted below,
management does not expect any of the recently issued accounting pronouncements, which have not
already been adopted, to have a material impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive
Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 provides companies
two choices for presenting net income and comprehensive income: in a single continuous
statement, or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Presenting comprehensive income in
the statement of equity is no longer an option. ASU No. 2011-05 is effective for the Company
beginning in fiscal year 2012 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as it only changes the disclosures surrounding
comprehensive income and as the Company already presents net income and comprehensive income in
a single continuous statement.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to
Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU
No. 2011-04 establishes a global standard for applying fair value measurement. In addition to a
few updates to the measurement guidance, ASU No. 2011-04 includes enhanced disclosure
requirements. The most significant change for companies reporting under U.S. GAAP is an
expansion of the disclosures required for Level 3 measurements; that is, measurements based on
unobservable inputs, such as a companys own data. This update is effective for the Company
beginning in fiscal year 2012. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU No. 2011-04
on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 24 -
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Our Business
We operate our business in two reportable segments Greatbatch Medical and Electrochem Solutions
(Electrochem). Greatbatch Medical designs and manufactures medical devices and components for
the cardiac rhythm management (CRM), neuromodulation, vascular access and orthopaedic markets.
Greatbatch Medicals component products include: 1) batteries, capacitors, filtered and unfiltered
feedthroughs, engineered components and enclosures used in implantable medical devices (IMDs); 2)
introducers, catheters, steerable sheaths and implantable stimulation leads; and 3) instruments and
delivery systems used in reconstructive, trauma and spine surgeries as well as hip, knee and
shoulder implants. Additionally, Greatbatch Medical offers value-added assembly and design
engineering services for medical systems and devices within the markets in which it operates. As a
result of the strategy put in place over three years ago, Greatbatch Medical now offers its
customers complete medical devices including design, development, manufacturing, regulatory
submission and supporting worldwide distribution. This medical device strategy is being
facilitated through our QiG Group (QiG) and leverages the component technology of Greatbatch
Medical and Electrochem in our core markets: cardiovascular, neuromodulation and orthopaedic.
Electrochem provides technology solutions for critical industrial applications, including
customized battery power and wireless sensing systems. Originating from the lithium cell invented
for the implantable pacemaker by our Companys founder, Wilson Greatbatch, Electrochems technology
and superior quality and reliability is utilized in markets worldwide.
Our Customers
Greatbatch Medical customers include leading original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), in
alphabetical order here and throughout this report, such as Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Johnson &
Johnson, Medtronic, Smith & Nephew, Sorin Group, St. Jude Medical, Stryker and Zimmer. The nature
and extent of our selling relationships with each OEM varies in terms of breadth of products
purchased, purchased product volumes, length of contractual commitment, ordering patterns,
inventory management and selling prices. During the six months ended July 1, 2011, Boston
Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and St. Jude Medical collectively accounted for 59% of our
total sales.
Our Electrochem customers operate in the energy, security, portable medical and environmental
monitoring markets and include 3M, General Electric, Halliburton, Honeywell, Weatherford and Zoll
Medical. During 2011, Electrochem entered into long-term supply agreements with several of its
larger OEM customers, thus securing a significant portion of their revenue. Additionally, these
contracts are significant because they are with customers in markets that historically have not
committed to long-term supply agreements, and provide a good example of how Electrochem is
deepening its relationship with customers and is a testament to their commitment to quality and
reliability.
Financial Overview
Second quarter 2011 sales grew 4% over the prior year period to $146.5 million, reflecting strong
orthopaedic revenue growth and favorable foreign currency exchange rates. Excluding the benefit of
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased sales by approximately $5 million in
the second quarter of 2011 (approximately $6 million year-to-date), sales were up 1% compared to
the prior year. Orthopaedic revenue growth for the quarter reflects customer product launches, as
well as market share gains as a result of the investments made in this product line over the last
several years. For the first half of 2011, total sales increased 8%, or 6% on a constant currency
basis, to $295.4 million. This strong constant currency growth was driven by our vascular access
(11%), orthopaedic (19%) and Electrochem (8%) product lines and illustrates the benefits of our
diversified revenue base. Our CRM and
Neuromodulation product line sales for the second quarter decreased 1% when compared to the prior
year period (consistent year-to-date) as the benefit of customer inventory builds and product
launches, was offset by continued pricing pressure, as well as the contraction in the underlying
CRM market.
- 25 -
Table of Contents
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (GAAP). Additionally, we consistently report and discuss in our
quarterly earnings releases and investor presentations adjusted operating income and margin,
adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share. These adjusted amounts consist of
GAAP amounts excluding the following adjustments to the extent they occur during the period: (i)
facility consolidation, manufacturing transfer and system integration charges, (ii) asset
write-down and disposition charges, (iii) severance charges in connection with corporate
realignments or a reduction in force (iv) the impact of non-cash charges to interest expense due to
the accounting change governing convertible debt, (v) unusual or infrequently occurring items, (vi)
certain R&D expenditures (such as medical device design verification testing (DVT) expenses),
(vii) gain/loss on the sale of investments and (viii) the income tax (benefit) related to these
adjustments. We believe that reporting these amounts provides important supplemental information
to our investors and creditors seeking to understand the financial and business trends relating to
our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, certain performance-based
compensation incentives provided to our executives are determined utilizing adjusted amounts.
GAAP operating income for the second quarter of 2011 increased 6% to $18.3 million, compared to
$17.3 million for the 2010 second quarter. Adjusted operating income increased 3% to $18.4 million
compared to $17.8 million for the comparable 2010 period. These improvements reflect the benefit
of the higher revenue during the quarter, as well as our various lean initiatives, which helped to
offset the negotiated price reductions given to some of our larger OEM customers at the end of last
year in exchange for long-term contracts. Additionally, during the quarter we continued to make
significant investment in support of our initiative to develop complete medical devices for our OEM
customers. For the first two quarters of 2011, GAAP and adjusted operating income were $36.3
million and $37.1 million, respectively, representing increases of 16% and 13%, respectively,
reflecting higher revenue and gross profit levels, which were partially offset by higher
professional and consulting costs.
A reconciliation of GAAP operating income to adjusted amounts is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Operating income as reported |
$ | 18,303 | $ | 17,317 | $ | 36,269 | $ | 31,313 | ||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||
Medical device DVT expenses (RD&E) |
634 | | 1,224 | | ||||||||||||
Consolidation costs |
22 | 536 | 261 | 856 | ||||||||||||
Integration expenses |
| 8 | | 130 | ||||||||||||
Asset dispositions and other |
(542 | ) | (49 | ) | (614 | ) | 501 | |||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 18,417 | $ | 17,812 | $ | 37,140 | $ | 32,800 | ||||||||
Adjusted operating margin |
12.6 | % | 12.7 | % | 12.6 | % | 12.0 | % | ||||||||
- 26 -
Table of Contents
GAAP and adjusted diluted EPS for the second quarter 2011 were $0.36 and $0.43 per share,
respectively, compared to $0.33 and $0.40 per share, respectively, for the second quarter 2010.
These represent increases of 9% and 8%, respectively and reflect our operational leverage discussed
above, and our financial leverage resulting from our significant debt reduction over the past year,
as well as a lower effective tax rate due to the reinstatement of the R&D tax credit. For the first
six months of 2011, GAAP and adjusted diluted EPS were $0.86 and $0.88 per share, respectively,
representing increases of 51% and 24%, respectively, over the prior year. During the first quarter
of 2011, we recorded a $4.5 million ($3.0 million net of tax and $0.12 per diluted share) gain from
the sale of a cost method investment, which is included in the GAAP diluted EPS amount for the
year-to-date period.
A reconciliation of GAAP net income and diluted EPS to adjusted amounts is as follows (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Income before taxes as reported |
$ | 12,764 | $ | 11,981 | $ | 30,591 | $ | 20,515 | ||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||
Medical device DVT expenses (RD&E) |
634 | | 1,224 | | ||||||||||||
Consolidation costs |
22 | 536 | 261 | 856 | ||||||||||||
Integration expenses |
| 8 | | 130 | ||||||||||||
Asset dispositions and other |
(542 | ) | (49 | ) | (614 | ) | 501 | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on cost method investments, net |
317 | | (4,232 | ) | | |||||||||||
CSN II conversion option discount amortization |
2,101 | 1,950 | 4,163 | 3,865 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted income before taxes |
15,296 | 14,426 | 31,393 | 25,867 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted provision for income taxes |
5,100 | 5,049 | 10,378 | 9,053 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted net income |
$ | 10,196 | $ | 9,377 | $ | 21,015 | $ | 16,814 | ||||||||
Adjusted diluted EPS |
$ | 0.43 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.71 | ||||||||
Number of shares |
23,838 | 23,926 | 23,767 | 23,946 |
Our CEOs View
We are pleased with the results for the first two quarters of the year, which exceeded our plans.
Our diversified revenue base helped us to deliver strong results despite the challenges we are
facing in the contracting CRM market. We continue to make significant investment in the development
of complete medical devices for our customers, which is being enabled by our operational and
financial leverage. I am encouraged by the progress we have made on our entire portfolio of medical
devices, which continue to build momentum. During 2011, we began to see the first revenues from
this strategy, which has generated over one million of incremental revenue in 2011 and is expected
to build meaningfully over the next several years. With that said, we remain cautious on the
near-term prospects for our Company due to the headwinds facing our markets, particularly within
our CRM product line.
- 27 -
Table of Contents
Government Regulation
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability
Reconciliation Act (collectively Health Care Reform) legislated broad-based changes to the U.S.
health care system that could significantly impact our business operations and financial results,
including higher or lower revenue, as well as higher employee medical costs and taxes. Health Care
Reform imposes significant new taxes on OEMs of approximately $20 billion over ten years, which
will result in a significant increase in the tax burden on our industry and which could have a
material, negative impact on our results of operations and our cash flows. Other elements of Health
Care Reform such as comparative effectiveness research, an independent payment advisory board,
payment system reforms including shared savings pilots and other provisions could meaningfully
change the way healthcare is developed and delivered, and may materially impact numerous aspects of
our business, results of operations and financial condition. Many significant parts of Health Care
Reform will be phased in over the next eight years and require further guidance and clarification
in the form of regulations. As a result, many of the impacts of Health Care Reform will not be
known until those regulations are enacted.
In January 2010, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Hazardous Materials:
Transportation of Lithium Batteries. PHMSA, in conjunction with the Federal Aviation
Administration is proposing to amend requirements in the hazardous materials regulations on the
transportation of lithium cells and batteries, including lithium cells and batteries packed or
contained in equipment. The Company is actively monitoring this rulemaking process and any other
legislative activities related to lithium battery transportation because of the potential negative
effect they could have on our Greatbatch Medical and Electrochem businesses.
Product Development
We continue to develop new component products for applications in our core markets, such as:
1. | Q power solutions QHR® & QMR®, which maximize device performance and longevity with minimal size; | ||
2. | QCAPS which, when paired with QHR batteries, provides the smallest, longest-lived, highest energy power solutions for tachycardia devices; | ||
3. | orthopaedic capabilities in order to improve quality and shorten lead-times including the opening of additional regional development centers; | ||
4. | minimally invasive surgical techniques for the orthopaedic industry; | ||
5. | disposable instrumentation for the orthopaedic industry; and | ||
6. | next generation power sources for Electrochems energy and portable medical customers. |
As part of the natural evolution of our Company, in 2008, we reassigned 40 Greatbatch Medical
engineers to create the QiG Group in order to help facilitate the development of complete medical
devices for our customers. In creating QiG, we pooled and focused the tremendous talent, resources
and capacity for innovation within our organization. Today, QiG encompasses 120 research and
development professionals working in facilities in five states and focused on three compelling
therapeutic areas: cardiovascular, neuromodulation and, longer-term, orthopaedics. Additionally,
QiG has established partnerships with nearly a dozen key physicians who are highly specialized in
these areas. These partnerships are helping us to design medical devices from the ground up with
features that will meet the needs of todays practicing clinicians.
- 28 -
Table of Contents
Within QiG, we are utilizing a disciplined and diversified portfolio approach with three investment
modesstrategic equity investments in start-up companies, OEM customer discrete projects, and
incubating new medical devices to be sold or licensed to an OEM partner. The QiG Group employs a
disciplined and thorough process for evaluating these opportunities. A scorecard process is
utilized to review and select the most strategically valuable ideas to pursue, taking into account
a host of variables including the market opportunity, regulatory pathway and reimbursement; market
need and market potential; intellectual property and projected financial return.
As a result of the investments we have made, we are now able to provide our customers with complete
medical devices. This includes development and regulatory submissions, as well as manufacturing
and supporting worldwide distribution. These medical devices are full product solutions that
complement our OEM customers products and utilize the component expertise and capabilities
residing within Greatbatch Medical and Electrochem. The benefits to our OEM customers include
shortening the time to market for these devices by accelerating the velocity of innovation,
optimizing their supply chain and ultimately providing them with cost efficiencies.
We are currently in various stages of development on over a dozen medical devices, either through
partnerships with our OEM customers or independently. While we do not intend to discuss each of
these projects individually each quarter, we will discuss significant milestones as they occur.
Some of the medical device projects that we currently are working on include:
Cardiovascular portfolio Venous and arterial introducers, anti-microbial coatings,
steerable delivery systems, and MRI conditional brady, gastric stimulation and sleep apnea leads.
Neuromodulation portfolio Algostim spinal cord stimulator for the treatment of chronic
pain of the trunk and limbs.
Cost Savings and Consolidation Efforts
In 2011 and 2010 we recorded charges in Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations related to cost savings and consolidation efforts. These
initiatives were undertaken to improve our operational efficiencies and profitability. Additional
information regarding the timing, cash flow and amount of future expenditures is set forth in Note
8 Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in this report.
- 29 -
Table of Contents
Our Financial Results
We utilize a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest December 31st.
For 52-week years, each quarter contains 13 weeks. The second quarter of 2011 and 2010 ended on
July 1, and July 2, respectively, and each contained 13 weeks. The commentary that follows should
be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes and
with the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contained in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
The following table presents certain selected financial information derived from our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for the periods presented (dollars in thousands, except per share
data):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | $ | % | July 1, | July 2, | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greatbatch Medical |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRM/Neuromodulation |
$ | 77,724 | $ | 78,838 | $ | (1,114 | ) | -1 | % | $ | 155,761 | $ | 155,763 | $ | (2 | ) | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Vascular Access |
10,769 | 11,007 | (238 | ) | -2 | % | 21,243 | 19,173 | 2,070 | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Orthopaedic |
37,922 | 30,488 | 7,434 | 24 | % | 77,511 | 59,929 | 17,582 | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Greatbatch Medical |
126,415 | 120,333 | 6,082 | 5 | % | 254,515 | 234,865 | 19,650 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Electrochem |
20,109 | 20,462 | (353 | ) | -2 | % | 40,843 | 37,959 | 2,884 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total sales |
146,524 | 140,795 | 5,729 | 4 | % | 295,358 | 272,824 | 22,534 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
99,920 | 95,336 | 4,584 | 5 | % | 201,584 | 185,701 | 15,883 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
46,604 | 45,459 | 1,145 | 3 | % | 93,774 | 87,123 | 6,651 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit as a % of sales |
31.8 | % | 32.3 | % | 31.7 | % | 31.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (SG&A) |
17,571 | 16,470 | 1,101 | 7 | % | 36,220 | 32,122 | 4,098 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SG&A as a % of sales |
12.0 | % | 11.7 | % | 12.3 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research, development and
engineering costs, net (RD&E) |
11,250 | 11,177 | 73 | 1 | % | 21,638 | 22,201 | (563 | ) | -3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
RD&E as a % of sales |
7.7 | % | 7.9 | % | 7.3 | % | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net |
(520 | ) | 495 | (1,015 | ) | NA | (353 | ) | 1,487 | (1,840 | ) | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
18,303 | 17,317 | 986 | 6 | % | 36,269 | 31,313 | 4,956 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating margin |
12.5 | % | 12.3 | % | 12.3 | % | 11.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
4,403 | 5,139 | (736 | ) | -14 | % | 8,677 | 10,287 | (1,610 | ) | -16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| (3 | ) | 3 | NA | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | (3 | ) | 60 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on cost method investments, net |
317 | | 317 | NA | (4,232 | ) | | (4,232 | ) | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
819 | 200 | 619 | 310 | % | 1,241 | 516 | 725 | 141 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,214 | 4,193 | 21 | 1 | % | 10,097 | 7,180 | 2,917 | 41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
33.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 33.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,550 | $ | 7,788 | $ | 762 | 10 | % | $ | 20,494 | $ | 13,335 | $ | 7,159 | 54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net margin |
5.8 | % | 5.5 | % | 6.9 | % | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.03 | 9 | % | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.29 | 51 | % |
- 30 -
Table of Contents
Sales
Consolidated second quarter 2011 sales grew 4% over the prior year period to $146.5 million.
Excluding the $5 million of benefit from foreign currency fluctuations, revenue growth was 1%
despite a slowdown in the CRM market and tough comparisons for our vascular access and Electrochem
product lines. Our orthopaedic product line reported strong organic revenue growth and was a
significant contributor to our solid second quarter results. For the year-to-date period, sales are
8% above the prior year period, or 6% on a constant currency basis, reflecting the benefits of our
diversified revenue base. It is important to note that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
only impact our orthopaedic product line sales. Thus, for all other product lines, the sales
change percentages disclosed are the same on both a reported and a constant currency basis.
Greatbatch Medical CRM and Neuromodulation product line sales for the second quarter 2011
decreased 1% compared to the prior year period and were consistent with the prior year for the
year-to-date period. During the first two quarters of 2011, CRM revenue included the benefit of
customer inventory builds and product launches, which was offset by continued pricing pressure, as
well as the contraction in the underlying CRM market. Currently, we believe that customer inventory
builds are now complete and will not recur in the second half of 2011. We are anticipating that
this will add additional pressure on our CRM revenue for the second half of the year in addition to
the market and pricing headwinds we are already facing.
Our visibility to customer ordering patterns is over a relatively short period of time. Our
customers have inventory management programs, alternative supply arrangements, and vertical
integration plans, and the relative market share among the OEM manufacturers changes continuously.
Additionally, we face pricing pressures from our customers and in particular our four largest OEM
customers upon which a significant portion of our sales is dependent. These pressures have
increased as of late due to the downturn in the economy, and more specifically, the contracting CRM
market. Consequently, these and other factors will continue to significantly impact our sales.
In comparison to the prior year, 2011 second quarter sales for the vascular access product line
decreased 2% to $10.8 million but increased 11% on a year-to-date basis primarily due to increased
introducer sales. First quarter 2010 introducer sales were impacted by customer inventory
reduction programs. Ordering patterns have now returned to a more normalized level. Vascular access
sales for the first half of 2011 include over $1 million of incremental medical device related
sales. Although the absolute revenue is still modest, we are making strong progress on all medical
device initiatives and expect this amount to continue to build meaningfully over the next several
years.
Orthopaedic sales of $37.9 million for the second quarter of 2011 were 24% above the comparable
2010 period, and included approximately $5 million of favorable foreign currency exchange rate
benefit. Excluding this benefit, sales increased 8% organically over the prior year period despite
slower than expected underlying market growth. For the first two quarters of 2011, orthopaedic
sales were $77.5 million and included $6 million of favorable foreign currency exchange rate
benefit. On a constant currency basis, 2011 year-to-date orthopaedic sales increased 19% over the
2010 period. These increases occurred across all of our orthopaedic products, which benefitted from
customer product launches, as well as from market share gains during the quarter. These market
share gains are a result of the investments made over the last several years to expand
capabilities, shorten lead times, and improve quality and on-time delivery. We expect Orthopaedic
revenue to continue to benefit from these factors for the remainder of 2011, which will be
partially offset by seasonal slow-downs in the third quarter.
- 31 -
Table of Contents
Electrochem Second quarter 2011 sales for Electrochem decreased 2% to $20.1 million compared to
$20.5 million in the second quarter of 2010, which included the benefit of customer inventory
re-stocking. For the year-to-date period, Electrochem sales were $40.8 million or 8% above the
prior year. Electrochem sales reflect continued strength in the energy and environmental
monitoring markets. We currently expect Electrochem revenue for the second half 2011 will be below
the run-rate for the first two quarters of this year, due to seasonality in the energy market and
the timing of inventory pulls by our customers in the environmental monitoring market.
2011 Outlook Given the results for the first two quarters, as well as our expectations for the
remainder of the year, at this time we are revising our 2011 guidance ranges provided at the
beginning of the year as follows:
Previous Guidance | Revised Guidance | |||
Sales
|
$540 million $560 million | $550 million $570 million | ||
Adjusted Operating Income as a % of Sales | 12.0% 13.0% | 12.0% 13.0% | ||
Adjusted Diluted EPS | $1.55 $1.65 | $1.60 $1.70 |
It is important to note that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations added approximately $6
million to revenue for the first two quarters of 2011 in comparison to 2010. It also is important
to note that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations do not materially impact our operating
income as the benefit from higher revenue levels are naturally offset by a corresponding increase
in production and administrative costs.
Gross Profit
Changes to gross profit as a percentage of sales from the prior year were due to the following:
Change From Prior Year | ||||||||
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
Capacity & productivity(a) |
2.2 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||
Performance-based compensation(b) |
-1.4 | % | -1.3 | % | ||||
Selling price(c) |
-1.7 | % | -1.5 | % | ||||
Mix change(d) |
-0.1 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||
Other |
0.5 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||
Total percentage point change to gross profit as a percentage of sales |
-0.5 | % | -0.2 | % | ||||
(a) | Our gross profit percentage benefitted from higher sales volumes, which absorbed excess capacity, as well as productivity gains from our various lean initiatives. | |
(b) | Our gross profit percentage for 2011 includes a higher level of performance-based compensation expense due to our strong first half results compared to 2010. Performance-based compensation is accrued based upon managements expectation of what level of performance will be achieved relative to targets set. | |
(c) | Our gross profit percentage was negatively impacted in 2011 in comparison to the prior year due to price concessions made to our larger OEM customers near the end of 2010 in exchange for long-term contracts. We expect this negative impact to continue for the remainder of 2011. | |
(d) | Our gross profit percentage was positively impacted by an increase in mix of higher margin Electrochem sales in comparison to the prior year, which was offset by an increase in lower margin orthopaedic sales as a percentage of total sales. |
- 32 -
Table of Contents
We expect that our gross profit margin will continue around the current level for the remainder of
the year. Over the long-term, we expect our gross profit margin to improve as more system and
device level products are introduced, which typically earn a higher margin, and as sales volumes
increase and absorb excess capacity.
SG&A Expenses
Changes to SG&A expenses from the prior year were due to the following (in thousands):
Change From Prior Year | ||||||||
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
Performance-based compensation(a) |
$ | (616 | ) | $ | 958 | |||
Professional and consulting expense(b) |
1,392 | 2,338 | ||||||
Other(c) |
325 | 802 | ||||||
Net increase in SG&A |
$ | 1,101 | $ | 4,098 | ||||
(a) | SG&A for the first six months of 2011 include a higher level of performance-based compensation expense due to our strong first half results compared to 2010. Performance-based compensation is accrued based upon managements expectation of what level of performance will be achieved relative to targets set. | |
(b) | Amounts represent the change in professional and consulting expense from the 2010 period and reflect a higher level of corporate development initiatives, including costs incurred in connection with our Investor Day in March 2011, as well as costs incurred as part of our medical device strategy, including consulting and a communication campaign with customers and employees. | |
(c) | SG&A costs were negatively impacted in 2011 as a result of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which increased SG&A costs by approximately $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the three and six month periods ending July 1, 2011, respectively, in comparison to 2010. |
RD&E Expenses, Net
Net RD&E costs are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Research and development costs |
$ | 4,633 | $ | 4,426 | $ | 8,512 | $ | 8,954 | ||||||||
Engineering costs |
8,657 | 8,804 | 17,567 | 16,817 | ||||||||||||
Less cost reimbursements |
(2,040 | ) | (2,053 | ) | (4,441 | ) | (3,570 | ) | ||||||||
Engineering costs, net |
6,617 | 6,751 | 13,126 | 13,247 | ||||||||||||
Total RD&E, net |
$ | 11,250 | $ | 11,177 | $ | 21,638 | $ | 22,201 | ||||||||
Net RD&E costs for the 2011 second quarter were $11.3 million, and were consistent with the prior
year, as we continue to invest resources in developing complete medical devices for our OEM
customers. For the first six months of 2011, net RD&E costs decreased $0.6 million to $21.6 million
compared to the prior year. First quarter 2011 results include higher cost reimbursements from
customers, which was primarily due to the achievement of contractual milestones on two medical
device projects. Excluding the higher cost reimbursements, net RD&E remained consistent with the
prior year for both the current quarter and year-to-date periods.
- 33 -
Table of Contents
During the second quarter of 2011, we incurred $5.6 million ($10.4 million year-to-date) of RD&E
expenses related to the development of medical devices compared to $4.7 million ($9.3 million
year-to-date) in 2010. Net RD&E for the second quarter of 2011 includes $0.6 million ($1.2 million
year-to-date) of DVT costs related to the QiG Groups development of a neuromodulation platform
compared to $0 for the prior year periods.
Over the long-term, we expect net RD&E, excluding DVT expenses, to remain around 8.5% to 9.0% of
sales. Net RD&E for the first half of 2011 is 7.3% of sales and is expected to be higher during the
second half of 2011.
Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net
Other operating (income) expense, net is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Orthopaedic facility optimization(a) |
$ | 22 | $ | | $ | 261 | $ | | ||||||||
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations(b) |
| 536 | | 856 | ||||||||||||
Integration costs(c) |
| 8 | | 130 | ||||||||||||
Asset dispositions and other(d) |
(542 | ) | (49 | ) | (614 | ) | 501 | |||||||||
Total other operating (income) expense, net |
$ | (520 | ) | $ | 495 | $ | (353 | ) | $ | 1,487 | ||||||
(a) | During the third quarter of 2010, we began to incur costs in connection with the optimization of our Orthopaedic operations in order to increase capacity, further expand our capabilities and reduce dependence on outside suppliers. Ultimately these updates will further reduce our lead times, improve quality and allow us to better meet the needs of our customers. Additional information regarding the timing, cash flow and amount of future expenditures is discussed in Note 8 Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report. | |
(b) | In 2010, we recorded charges related to our various cost savings and consolidation efforts initiated in 2007 and 2008. Over the long-term, we expect these initiatives to continue to positively impact operational efficiencies and profitability. Additional information regarding the timing, cash flow and amount of future expenditures is discussed in Note 8 Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report. | |
(c) | During 2010, we incurred costs related to the integration of the companies acquired in 2007 and 2008. The integration initiatives include the implementation of the Oracle ERP system, training and compliance with policies, as well as the implementation of lean manufacturing and six sigma initiatives. The expenses were primarily for consultants, relocation and travel costs. | |
(d) | During 2011 and 2010, we recorded (gains) write-downs in connection with various asset disposals net of insurance proceeds received, if any. |
- 34 -
Table of Contents
Interest Expense and Interest Income
Interest expense for the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2011 were below the comparable
periods of 2010 primarily due to the benefit of paying down our long-term debt with excess cash
flow from operations. Interest income for the same periods of 2011 was relatively consistent with
the comparable 2010 periods. We currently expect that our new credit facility will add
approximately $0.5 million to $1.0 million of additional interest expense in 2011.
Gain (Loss) on Cost Method Investments, Net
During the second quarter of 2011, we recorded a $0.3 million write down of one of our cost method
investments based upon a recent stock offering by that company. This investment now has a $0 book
value. In January 2011, we sold our cost method investment in IntElect Medical, Inc. (IntElect)
in conjunction with Boston Scientifics acquisition of IntElect. We obtained our ownership
interest in IntElect through our acquisition of BIOMEC, Inc. in 2007 and two subsequent additional
investments. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4.5 million ($3.0 million net-of-tax).
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net primarily includes the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on
transactions denominated in foreign currencies.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended July 1, 2011 was 33% versus 35% for the
comparable 2010 periods primarily as a result of the research and development tax credit, which
expired at the end of 2009 and was reinstated in the fourth quarter of 2010 for 2010 and 2011.
We believe it is reasonably possible that a reduction of up to $1.0 million of the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months as a result of the expiration of
applicable statutes of limitation, which would positively impact the effective tax rate in the
period of reduction.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of | ||||||||
July 1, | December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents(a) |
$ | 36,942 | $ | 22,883 | ||||
Working capital(a) |
$ | 176,062 | $ | 150,922 | ||||
Current ratio(a) |
3.35 | 3.49 |
(a) | The increase in cash and cash equivalents, and working capital primarily relates to cash flow from operations of $37.8 million for the first half of 2011 offset by $20 million of cash used to pay down long-term debt. Cash used in investing activities for the first six months of 2011 was slightly lower than the same period of 2010 as a higher level of capital expenditures was offset by the proceeds received from the sale of a cost method investment in 2011. Our current ratio remained relatively consistent with the year-end amount. |
- 35 -
Table of Contents
Revolving Line of Credit On June 24, 2011, we amended and extended our revolving credit facility
(the 2011 Credit Facility) to replace our existing credit facility, which had an expiration date
of May 22, 2012. The 2011 Credit Facility provides a $400 million secured revolving credit
facility, which can be increased to $600 million upon our request and approval by a majority of the
lenders. The 2011 Credit Facility also contains a $15 million letter of credit subfacility and a
$15 million swingline subfacility. The 2011 Credit Facility has a maturity date of June 24, 2016;
provided, however, if our convertible notes are not repaid in full, modified or refinanced before
March 1, 2013, the maturity date of the 2011 Credit Facility shall be March 1, 2013.
The 2011 Credit Facility is supported by a consortium of fourteen banks with no bank controlling
more than 19% of the facility. As of July 1, 2011, each bank supporting the 2011 Credit Facility
has an S&P credit rating of at least BBB- or better, which is considered investment grade.
The 2011 Credit Facility requires us to maintain a rolling four quarter ratio of adjusted EBITDA to
interest expense of at least 3.0 to 1.0. For the rolling four quarter period ended July 1, 2011,
our ratio of adjusted EBITDA to interest expense, calculated in accordance with our credit
agreement, was 17.5 to 1.00, well above the required limit. The 2011 Credit Facility also requires
us to maintain a total leverage ratio of not greater than 4.5 to 1.0 through December 30, 2011 and
not greater than 4.0 to 1.0 from December 31, 2011 and thereafter. As of July 1, 2011, our total
leverage ratio, calculated in accordance with our credit agreement, was 1.98 to 1.00, well below
the required limit.
The 2011 Credit Facility contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the
continuance of an event of default, a majority of the lenders may declare the outstanding advances
and all other obligations under the 2011 Credit Facility immediately due and payable. See Note 5
Debt of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for a more
detailed description of the 2011 Credit Facility.
As of July 1, 2011, we had $370 million of borrowing capacity available under the 2011 Credit
Facility. This amount may vary from period to period based upon our debt and EBITDA levels, which
impacts the covenant calculations discussed above. We believe that our cash flow from operations
and the 2011 Credit Facility provide adequate liquidity to meet our short- and long- term funding
needs.
Operating activities Cash flows from operations for the first six months of 2011 were $37.8
million, which was below the comparable 2010 period of $44.2 million. The decrease from the prior
year is primarily due to the timing of cash receipts and payments. More specifically, net cash
provided by operating assets and liabilities decreased approximately $12 million when compared to
the prior year.
Investing activities Net cash used in investing activities for the first six months of 2011 was
$3.1 million compared to $5.6 million for the same period of 2010. This decrease was primarily
related to the net proceeds received from cost method investments of $10.4 million partially offset
by an increase in maintenance capital expenditures as well as further investments in our
Orthopaedic facilities to add to our capabilities. Our current expectation is that capital
spending for the remainder of 2011 will be in the range of $20 million to $30 million, of which
approximately half is discretionary in nature. In January 2011, we announced our intention to
construct an 80,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Allen County, IN. We broke ground on
this facility during the second quarter of 2011 and we expect this facility to be operational by
mid-2012. Total investment in this facility is expected to be approximately
$17 million. Other than this facility, capital spending relates to routine maintenance investments
to support our internal growth.
We anticipate that cash on hand along with cash flow from operations and availability under our
revolving line of credit will be sufficient to fund these capital expenditures. Going forward, we
will continue to consider strategically targeted and opportunistic acquisitions.
- 36 -
Table of Contents
Financing activities Net cash used in financing activities for the first six months of 2011 was
$21.2 million compared to $30.5 million for the prior year period. During the second quarter of
2011, we repaid $20 million of long-term debt compared to $30.5 million in the 2010 period. Going
forward, we expect excess cash flow from operations to be used to pay down outstanding debt.
Capital Structure As of July 1, 2011, our capital structure consisted of $197.8 million of
convertible subordinated notes, $30.0 million of debt under our revolving line of credit and 23.4
million shares of common stock outstanding. Additionally, we had $36.9 million in cash and cash
equivalents, which is sufficient to meet our short-term operating cash needs. If necessary, we
currently have access to $370 million under our revolving line of credit and are authorized to
issue 100 million shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock. The market
value of our outstanding common stock since our initial public offering has exceeded our book
value; accordingly, we believe that if needed we can access public markets to raise additional
capital. Our capital structure allows us to support our internal growth and provides liquidity for
corporate development initiatives. We continuously evaluate our capital structure, including our
revolving line of credit, as it relates to our anticipated long-term funding needs. Changes to our
capital structure may occur as a result of this analysis, or changes in market conditions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations at July 1, 2011:
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations at July 1, 2011:
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remainder of | ||||||||||||||||||||
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS | Total | 2011 | 2012 - 2013 | 2014 - 2015 | After 2015 | |||||||||||||||
Debt obligations(a) |
$ | 241,932 | $ | 2,750 | $ | 206,557 | $ | 2,100 | $ | 30,525 | ||||||||||
Operating lease obligations(b) |
14,452 | 1,290 | 4,490 | 4,012 | 4,660 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations(b) |
32,370 | 22,049 | 6,761 | 260 | 3,300 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts(b) |
4,800 | 4,800 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Pension obligations(c) |
12,527 | 528 | 2,366 | 2,518 | 7,115 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 306,081 | $ | 31,417 | $ | 220,174 | $ | 8,890 | $ | 45,600 | ||||||||||
(a) | Includes the annual interest expense on our convertible subordinated notes of 2.25%, which is paid semi-annually. Amounts also include the expected interest expense on the $30.0 million outstanding on our line of credit based upon the period end weighted average interest rate of 3.50%. See Note 5 Debt of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information. | |
(b) | See Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information about our operating leases, purchase obligations and foreign currency contracts. | |
(c) | See Note 6 Pension Plans of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information about our pension plan obligations. These amounts do not include any potential future contributions to our pension plan that may be necessary if the rate of return earned on pension plan assets is not sufficient to fund the rate of increase of our pension liability. Future cash contributions may be required. As of December 31, 2010, the most recent valuation date, our actuarially determined pension benefit obligation exceeded the plans assets by $4.6 million. |
- 37 -
Table of Contents
This table does not reflect $2.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits as we are uncertain as to if
or when such amounts may be settled. Refer to Note 9 Income Taxes of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information about these
unrecognized tax benefits.
We self-fund the medical insurance coverage provided to our U.S. based employees. Our risk is
being limited through the use of stop loss insurance, which has an annual deductible of $0.2
million per covered participant. The maximum aggregate loss (i.e. sum of all claims under the $0.2
million deductible) is limited to $14.2 million with a maximum benefit of $1.0 million. As of July
1, 2011, we have $3.7 million accrued related to our self-insured medical plan, which is recorded
in Accrued Expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, and is primarily based upon claim
history. This table does not reflect any potential future payments for self-insured medical claims.
We are a member of a group self-insurance trust that provides workers compensation benefits to our
employees located in Western New York. Based on actual experience, we could receive a refund or be
assessed additional contributions for workers compensation claims. No amounts have been recorded
for any refund or additional assessment since the Trust has not informed us of any such
adjustments. Under the trust agreement, each participating organization has joint and several
liability for trust obligations if the assets of the trust are not sufficient to cover those
obligations. During the second quarter of 2011, we decided to terminate our membership in the
self-insurance trust and, beginning in 2012, will utilize traditional insurance relationships to
provide workers compensation benefits for our Western New York employees. This table does not
reflect any potential payments which may be due as a result of our participation in or withdrawal
from this self-insurance trust.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In the normal course of business, we evaluate all new accounting pronouncements issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF), American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) or other
authoritative accounting body to determine the potential impact they may have on our Consolidated
Financial Statements. In the second quarter of 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, and
ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value
Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, which are effective for our fiscal
year 2012. See Note 15 Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for additional information about these recently
issued accounting standards and their potential impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
- 38 -
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this report and other written and oral statements made from
time to time by us and our representatives are not statements of historical or current fact. As
such, they are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have
based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, which are subject to known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions. They include statements relating to:
| future sales, expenses and profitability; | ||
| the future development and expected growth of our business and the markets we operate in; | ||
| our ability to successfully execute our business model and our business strategy; | ||
| our ability to identify trends within the implantable medical devices, medical components, and Electrochem markets and to offer products and services that meet the changing needs of those markets; | ||
| our ability to design, develop, and commercialize complete medical devices; | ||
| projected capital expenditures; and | ||
| trends in government regulation, including the impact of Health Care Reform and recent proposed federal regulations impacting the transportation of lithium batteries. |
You can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should,
could, expects, intends, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts,
potential or continue or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These
statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially from those
suggested by these forward-looking statements. In evaluating these statements and our prospects
generally, you should carefully consider the factors set forth below. All forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by these cautionary factors and to others contained throughout this report. We are under
no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report or to conform
these statements to actual results.
Although it is not possible to create a comprehensive list of all factors that may cause actual
results to differ from the results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements or that
may affect our future results, some of these factors include the following: dependence upon a
limited number of customers, product obsolescence, inability to market current or future products
including complete medical devices, pricing pressure from and vertical integration by our
customers, reliance on third party suppliers for raw materials, products and subcomponents,
fluctuating operating results, inability to maintain high quality standards for our products,
challenges to our intellectual property rights, product liability claims, inability to successfully
consummate and integrate acquisitions, unsuccessful expansion into new markets, competition,
inability to obtain licenses to key technology, regulatory changes or consolidation in the
healthcare industry, and other risks and uncertainties that arise from time to time as described in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
- 39 -
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. |
Foreign Currency We have significant foreign operations in France, Mexico and Switzerland, which
expose the Company to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations due to transactions denominated
in Euros, Mexican pesos and Swiss francs, respectively. We continuously evaluate our foreign
currency risk and will take action from time to time in order to best mitigate these risks, which
includes the use of various derivative instruments such as forward currency exchange contracts. A
hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to our most significant foreign
currency exposures would have had an impact of approximately $11 million on our annual sales. This
amount is not indicative of the hypothetical net earnings impact due to partially offsetting
impacts on cost of sales and operating expenses in those currencies. We estimate that foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations during the six months ended July 1, 2011 increased sales in
comparison to the 2010 period by approximately $6 million.
In July 2010 and February 2011, we entered into forward contracts to purchase 6.6 million and 3.7
million, respectively, Mexican pesos per month through December 2011 at an exchange rate of 13.2231
pesos and 12.2761 pesos per one U.S. dollar, respectively. These contracts were entered into in
order to hedge the risk of peso-denominated payments associated with a portion of the operations at
our Tijuana, Mexico facility for 2011 and are being accounted for as cash flow hedges.
As of July 1, 2011, these contracts had a positive fair value of $0.5 million, which is recorded
within Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The
amount recorded as a reduction of Cost of Sales during the six months ended July 1, 2011 and six
months ended July 2, 2010 related to these forward contracts was $0.3 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. No portion of the change in fair value of our foreign currency contracts during the
six months ended July 1, 2011 or July 2, 2010 was considered ineffective.
We translate all assets and liabilities of our foreign operations, where the U.S. dollar is not the
functional currency, at the period-end exchange rate and translate sales and expenses at the
average exchange rates in effect during the period. The net effect of these translation
adjustments is recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as Comprehensive Income.
The translation adjustment for the six months ended July 1, 2011 was an $11.3 million gain.
Translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to permanent investments
in our foreign subsidiaries. Net foreign currency transaction gains and losses included in Other
Expense, Net amounted to a loss of $1.1 million for the six months ended July 1, 2011. A
hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to our most significant foreign
currency net assets would have had an impact of approximately $11 million on our foreign net assets
as of July 1, 2011.
Interest Rates Interest rates on our revolving line of credit reset, at our option, based upon
the prime rate or LIBOR rate, thus subjecting us to interest rate risk. To help offset this risk,
from time to time, we enter into receive floating-pay fixed interest rate swaps indexed to the same
applicable index rate as the debt it is hedging. The objective of these swaps is to hedge against
potential changes in cash flows on our outstanding revolving line of credit. No credit risk is
hedged. Our interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
As of July 1, 2011, we had $30 million outstanding on our revolving line of credit and no interest
rate swaps outstanding. See Note 5 Debt of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements in this report for additional information about our interest rate swap contracts.
- 40 -
Table of Contents
No portion of the change in fair value of the interest rate swaps outstanding during the 2011 or
2010 periods was considered ineffective. The amount recorded as additional Interest Expense
related to the interest rate swaps for the six months ended July 1, 2011 and July 2, 2010 was $0.4
million and $1.2 million, respectively.
A hypothetical one percentage point change in the prime rate on the $30 million of floating rate
revolving line of credit debt outstanding at July 1, 2011 would have an impact of approximately
$0.1 million on our interest expense.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) related to the recording, processing, summarization and
reporting of information in our reports that we file with the SEC as of July 1, 2011. These
disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable assurance that material
information relating to us, including our subsidiaries, is made known to our management, including
these officers, by other of our employees, and that this information is recorded, processed,
summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms. Based on their evaluation, as of July 1, 2011, our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
b. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
our last fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. |
There have been no material changes to the Companys legal proceedings as previously disclosed in
the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS. |
There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the Companys Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. |
None.
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. |
None.
- 41 -
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. | (REMOVED AND RESERVED) |
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION. |
None.
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS. |
See the Exhibit Index for a list of those exhibits filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 9, 2011 | GREATBATCH, INC. |
|||
By | /s/ Thomas J. Hook | |||
Thomas J. Hook | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
By | /s/ Thomas J. Mazza | |||
Thomas J. Mazza | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
By | /s/ Marco F. Benedetti | |||
Marco F. Benedetti | ||||
Corporate Controller & Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
- 42 -
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2008). |
|||
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to our annual report on Form 10-K for the period
ended January 1, 2010). |
|||
10.1* | Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement between
Greatbatch, Inc. and its Named Executive Officers. |
|||
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. |
|||
31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. |
|||
32* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
|||
101.SCH | XBRL Extension Schema Document |
|||
101.CAL | XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|||
101.LAB | XBRL Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|||
101.PRE | XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|||
101.DEF | XBRL Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
* | - Filed herewith. |
- 43 -