LANDMARK BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2005 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For transition period from to |
Commission File Number 0-33203
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
43-1930755 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
800 Poyntz Avenue, Manhattan, Kansas 66502 |
||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
||
|
||
(785) 565-2000 |
||
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrants classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: As of May 9, 2005, the Registrant had outstanding 2,110,588 shares of its common stock, $.01 par value per share.
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Table of Contents
PART I |
||
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements and Related Notes |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
1
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
13,761,529 |
|
$ |
7,845,438 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
131,520,943 |
|
133,604,335 |
|
||
Loans, net |
|
274,435,929 |
|
277,413,963 |
|
||
Loans held for sale |
|
1,741,270 |
|
846,003 |
|
||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
5,758,115 |
|
5,864,258 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
7,651,892 |
|
7,651,892 |
|
||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
1,263,968 |
|
1,339,832 |
|
||
Accrued interest and other assets |
|
7,886,823 |
|
7,525,173 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
444,020,469 |
|
$ |
442,090,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
$ |
307,203,307 |
|
$ |
302,867,721 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
75,762,791 |
|
81,053,321 |
|
||
Other borrowings |
|
15,133,000 |
|
13,518,000 |
|
||
Accrued expenses, taxes and other liabilities |
|
3,744,707 |
|
2,482,875 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
401,843,805 |
|
399,921,917 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $0.01 par, 3,000,000 shares authorized, Issued 2,230,435 and 2,230,435 shares, respectively |
|
22,322 |
|
22,322 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
20,005,540 |
|
19,969,551 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
25,673,403 |
|
25,228,826 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income |
|
(318,778 |
) |
154,101 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost; 139,128 shares |
|
(3,205,823 |
) |
(3,205,823 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
42,176,664 |
|
42,168,977 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
444,020,469 |
|
$ |
442,090,894 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans |
|
$ |
4,101,714 |
|
$ |
3,227,509 |
|
Investment securities |
|
1,036,801 |
|
811,325 |
|
||
Other |
|
13,070 |
|
8,332 |
|
||
Total interest income |
|
5,151,585 |
|
4,047,166 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
1,160,065 |
|
932,801 |
|
||
Borrowed funds |
|
880,726 |
|
349,444 |
|
||
Total interest expense |
|
2,040,791 |
|
1,282,245 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income |
|
3,110,794 |
|
2,764,921 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
120,000 |
|
60,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
2,990,794 |
|
2,704,921 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fees and service charges |
|
797,659 |
|
532,735 |
|
||
Gains on sale of loans |
|
165,576 |
|
234,885 |
|
||
Gains on sale of investments |
|
|
|
97,687 |
|
||
Other |
|
97,180 |
|
81,501 |
|
||
Total non-interest income |
|
1,060,415 |
|
946,808 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Compensation and benefits |
|
1,457,718 |
|
1,217,804 |
|
||
Occupancy and equipment |
|
490,234 |
|
370,159 |
|
||
Data processing |
|
128,996 |
|
78,865 |
|
||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
96,030 |
|
75,147 |
|
||
Professional fees |
|
86,143 |
|
78,694 |
|
||
Advertising |
|
84,840 |
|
42,488 |
|
||
Other |
|
554,281 |
|
394,164 |
|
||
Total non-interest expense |
|
2,898,242 |
|
2,257,321 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings before income taxes |
|
1,152,967 |
|
1,394,408 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income tax expense |
|
349,591 |
|
445,647 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
803,376 |
|
$ |
948,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
$ |
0.1619 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
1,669,181 |
|
$ |
(534,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net decrease in loans |
|
2,629,990 |
|
3,028,649 |
|
||
Maturities and prepayments of investments |
|
9,443,110 |
|
5,597,814 |
|
||
Purchase of investment securities |
|
(8,405,034 |
) |
(6,264,643 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities |
|
|
|
173,916 |
|
||
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment and foreclosed assets |
|
66,966 |
|
64,215 |
|
||
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
|
(70,717 |
) |
(161,336 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
3,664,315 |
|
2,438,615 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase/(decrease) in deposits |
|
4,335,586 |
|
(1,740,018 |
) |
||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
40,200,000 |
|
4,100,000 |
|
||
Federal Home Loan Bank repayments |
|
(45,209,192 |
) |
(6,309,192 |
) |
||
Proceeds from other borrowings |
|
2,505,000 |
|
|
|
||
Repayments on other borrowings |
|
(890,000 |
) |
|
|
||
Purchase of 0 and 19,471 shares of treasury stock |
|
|
|
(585,225 |
) |
||
Issuance of 0 and 22,628 shares of common stock under stock option plans |
|
|
|
322,459 |
|
||
Payment of dividends |
|
(358,799 |
) |
(356,402 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
|
582,595 |
|
(4,568,378 |
) |
||
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
5,916,091 |
|
(2,663,919 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
7,845,438 |
|
7,708,115 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
13,761,529 |
|
$ |
5,044,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during period for interest |
|
$ |
1,861,000 |
|
$ |
1,231,000 |
|
Cash paid during period for taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Transfer of loans to real estate owned |
|
$ |
158,000 |
|
$ |
59,000 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Interim Financial Statements
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) and subsidiary have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. To the extent that information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements are contained in or consistent with the consolidated audited financial statements incorporated by reference in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, such information and footnotes have not been duplicated herein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial statements have been reflected herein. The December 31, 2004, condensed consolidated balance sheet has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that date. The results of the interim period ended March 31, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2005.
2. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share have been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share include the effect of all potential common shares outstanding during each period. Earnings and dividends per share for all periods presented have been adjusted to give effect to the 5% stock dividend paid by the Company in December 2004.
The shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted income per share are shown below:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic) |
|
2,110,588 |
|
2,195,210 |
|
Dilutive stock options |
|
12,521 |
|
19,053 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (diluted) |
|
2,123,109 |
|
2,214,263 |
|
3. Stock Based Compensation
The Company utilizes the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123 establishes a fair-value method of accounting for employee stock options or similar equity instruments. The fair value of stock-based awards to employees is calculated through the use of option pricing models, even though such models were developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly differ from the Companys stock option awards. These models also require subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of its stock options. The fair value is recognized as compensation expense over the option vesting period of five years.
In December 2004, The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (revised), Shared-Based Payment. The revision disallows the expense recognition alternatives permitted in the original statement and requires entities to recognize stock-based compensation cost in their statements of earnings.
5
The revision contains additional guidance in several areas including award modifications and forfeitures, measuring fair value, classifying an award as equity or as a liability, and attributing compensation cost to reporting periods. It also contains additional disclosure requirements. The Company does not expect that adoption of the revised Statement on January 1, 2006, will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
4. Comprehensive Income
The Companys other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and an unrealized gain on an interest rate swap as shown below:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
803,376 |
|
$ |
948,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) |
|
(820,708 |
) |
461,729 |
|
||
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net earnings |
|
|
|
97,687 |
|
||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities |
|
(820,708 |
) |
364,042 |
|
||
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap |
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
(289,829 |
) |
138,335 |
|
||
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(472,879 |
) |
$ |
1,174,468 |
|
5. Intangible Assets
The following table presents information about the Companys intangible assets, which are being amortized in accordance with SFAS No. 142:
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
||||
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit premium |
|
$ |
1,385,000 |
|
$ |
(543,819 |
) |
$ |
1,385,000 |
|
$ |
(491,501 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
758,676 |
|
(335,889 |
) |
766,892 |
|
(320,559 |
) |
||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,143,676 |
|
$ |
(879,708 |
) |
$ |
2,151,892 |
|
$ |
(812,060 |
) |
Aggregate amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and March 31, 2004, was $96,000 and $75,000, respectively. The following table represents the estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31,:
Year |
|
Amount |
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
337,000 |
|
2006 |
|
352,000 |
|
|
2007 |
|
233,000 |
|
|
2008 |
|
122,000 |
|
|
2009 |
|
97,000 |
|
|
6
6. Other Events
On May 13, 2005, the Company announced the execution of a definitive purchase agreement to acquire two branch locations in Great Bend, Kansas from UMB Financial Corporation. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will purchase approximately $38.0 million in deposits along with the branch facilities. The transaction is subject to the approvals of appropriate regulatory agencies. The purchase is expected to be completed during the third quarter of 2005.
In addition, the Company has entered into an agreement to construct a new branch location in Topeka, Kansas which is anticipated to be completed in early 2006.
7
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview. Landmark Bancorp, Inc. is a one-bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and is engaged in the banking business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Landmark National Bank. Landmark Bancorp is listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol LARK. Landmark National Bank is dedicated to providing quality financial and banking services to its local communities. Landmark National Bank originates commercial real estate and non-real estate loans, one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, multi-family residential mortgage loans, and home equity loans.
Critical accounting policies are those which are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require our managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting policies relate to the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of investment securities, and accounting for income taxes, all of which involve significant judgment by our management.
We perform periodic and systematic detailed reviews of our lending portfolio to assess overall collectability. The level of the allowance for loan losses reflects our estimate of the collectability of the loan portfolio. While these estimates are based on substantive methods for determining allowance requirements, nevertheless, actual outcomes may differ significantly from estimated results. Additional explanation of the methodologies used in establishing this reserve is provided in the Asset Quality and Distribution section.
We report our investment securities at estimated fair values based on readily ascertainable values which are obtained from independent sources. Our management performs periodic reviews of the investment securities to determine if any investment securities have declined in value which might be considered other than temporary. Although we believe that our estimates of the fair values of investment securities to be reasonable, economic and market factors may affect the amounts that will ultimately be realized from these investments.
Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors that influence interest rates, loan demand and deposit flows. In addition, we are subject to interest rate risk to the degree that our interest-earning assets mature or reprice at different times, or at different speeds, than our interest-bearing liabilities. Our results of operations are also affected by non-interest income, such as service charges, loan fees and gains and losses from the sale of newly originated loans and investments. Our principal operating expenses, aside from interest expense, consist of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy costs, data processing expenses, amortization expense and provision for potential loan losses.
The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entitys financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences, including the effects of IRS examinations and examinations by other state agencies, could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.
8
We are significantly impacted by prevailing economic conditions including federal monetary and fiscal policies and federal regulations of financial institutions. Deposit balances are influenced by numerous factors such as competing personal investments, the level of personal income and the personal rate of savings within our market areas. Factors influencing lending activities include the demand for housing and the interest rate pricing competition from other lending institutions.
Summary of Results. Net earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2005, decreased $145,000, or 15.3%, to $803,000 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. This decline in net earnings was generally attributable to an increase in non-interest expense which was offset by an improvement of net interest income. Also contributing to the decline in net earnings was an increase of our loan loss provision in the first quarter. The increases in non-interest expense and the improvement of net interest income primarily resulted from our acquisition of First Kansas on April 1, 2004, as we incurred additional expenses associated with operating these new branches and as our average earning assets increased. The increase in our loan loss provision during the quarter primarily related to our commercial loan growth.
The three months ended March 31, 2005, resulted in diluted earnings per share of $0.38 compared to $0.43 for the same period in 2004. Return on average assets for the three months ended March 31, 2005, was 0.74% compared to 1.15% for the same period in 2004. Return on average stockholders equity was 7.70% for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to 8.88% for the same period in 2004.
The following table summarizes net earnings and key performance measures for the two periods presented.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
803,376 |
|
$ |
948,761 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Earnings ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Return on average assets (1) |
|
0.74 |
% |
1.15 |
% |
||
Return on average equity (1) |
|
7.70 |
% |
8.88 |
% |
||
Dividend payout ratio |
|
44.74 |
% |
37.77 |
% |
||
Net interest margin (1) |
|
3.08 |
% |
3.53 |
% |
(1) The ratio has been annualized and is not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.
Interest Income. Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005, increased $1.1 million, or 21.1%, to $5.1 million from $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. This increase was primarily the result of the increase in interest earning assets from the First Kansas acquisition in April of 2004. This increase was offset by the excess liquidity resulting from the mortgage refinancings and paydowns being invested into lower yielding investment securities. Average loans for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, increased to $279.6 million from $212.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The increase in average loans was primarily the result of the acquisition of First Kansas. Interest income on loans increased $874,000, or 27.1%, to $4.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. Average investment securities also increased as a result of the First Kansas acquisition, from $99.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, to $131.0 million for the same period of 2005. Interest income on investment securities increased $225,000, or 27.8%, to $1.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
9
Interest Expense. Interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2005, increased $759,000, or 40.1%, to $2.0 million from $1.3 million as compared to the same period of 2004. Interest expense on deposits increased $227,000, or 24.4%, to $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in interest expense on deposits resulted from an increase in average deposits from $253.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, to $300.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, and as a result of the rise in interest rates in the second half of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005. Interest expense on borrowings increased $531,000, or 152.0%, to $881,000, for the three month period. The increase in interest expense on borrowings resulted primarily from the additional FHLB advances of $56.4 million which we assumed through the acquisition of First Kansas and the $15.2 million of other borrowings originated to consummate the First Kansas acquisition.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased to $3.1 million, or by 12.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, primarily as a result of the First Kansas acquisition in April 2004. The increase in our average earning assets during the first three months of 2005 to $410.0 million from $315.2 million for the same period of 2004 was also primarily attributable to the acquisition of First Kansas. The net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2005, was 3.08%, down from 3.53% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The decline in our net interest margin was primarily the result of the increased FHLB advances acquired with the First Kansas acquisition which are priced relatively higher than deposit rates. Additionally, the residential mortgage loans acquired with from First Kansas are also at rates that are relatively lower than the average of our loan portfolio prior to the acquisition. Also contributing to the decline in the net interest margin is a continued reduction in loans arising from payoffs and refinancings in the one-to-four family residential loan portfolio exceeding our ability to generate new commercial and consumer loans. We believe the increase in Federal Funds rates in the second half of 2004 and during the first quarter of 2005 by the Federal Open Market Committee will have a positive impact on our net interest margin in the latter part of 2005 as our interest rates on earning assets reprice to higher rates.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses increased to $120,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $60,000 the three months ended March 31, 2004. Our continuous review of the loan portfolio prompted an increase in our provision, relating primarily to our commercial loan growth. First Kansas had an allowance for loan losses of approximately $352,000, or 0.47% of outstanding loans, at March 31, 2004, which increased our allowance following the acquisition. One measure of the adequacy of the allowance for estimated losses on loans is the ratio of the allowance to the total loan portfolio. At March 31, 2005, the allowance for loan losses was $3.0 million, or 1.1% of gross loans outstanding, compared to $2.9 million, or 1.0% of gross loans outstanding, at December 31, 2004. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, our net charge-offs were $1,500 compared to $18,000 during the same period of 2004.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $113,000, or 12.0%, for the three months ended March 31, 2005, to $1.1 million from $947,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in non-interest income reflected increased fees and service charges from $533,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, to $798,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. This significant increase in fees and service charges was the result of the acquisition of First Kansas in April 2004 and from substantially increasing the number of our retail checking accounts opened through new marketing initiatives that were introduced in early 2004. Also contributing to the increase in non-interest income was a $16,000 increase in other fee income for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to the same period of 2004, which was primarily attributable to the sale of other assets.
Partially offsetting these increases in non-interest income was a decline in gains on sale of loans of 29.5%, from $235,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, to $166,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as residential mortgage financing activity dropped. Mortgage refinancings and prepayments
10
were lower during the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004. Another offset to the increases in non-interest income was a decrease in gains on sale of investments of $98,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004 as we did not sell any investments during the first quarter of 2005. We periodically sell equity securities from our holding companys investment portfolio based on performance and other indicators and we could sell additional equity securities in future periods.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fees and service charges |
|
$ |
797,659 |
|
$ |
532,735 |
|
Gains on sales of loans |
|
165,576 |
|
234,885 |
|
||
Gains on sales of investments |
|
|
|
97,687 |
|
||
Other |
|
97,180 |
|
81,501 |
|
||
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
1,060,415 |
|
$ |
946,808 |
|
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $641,000, or 20.6%, to $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $2.3 million for the same period in 2004. The increase was primarily related to a $240,000 increase in compensation and benefits, a $120,000 increase in occupancy and equipment expense, and a $50,000 increase in data processing expenses, all of which was associated primarily with the operations of the branches acquired from First Kansas. The acquisition of First Kansas added four branch locations and approximately 30 employees to our Company. Also contributing to the increase in non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005, was an increase of $42,000 in advertising expenses related to our new marketing initiative that was introduced in early 2004. In addition, amortization expense increased $21,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to the same period of 2004 associated with the additional core deposit premium that resulted from the First Kansas acquisition. Other non-interest expense also increased as a result of the operations of the new branches associated with the First Kansas acquisition.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
1,457,718 |
|
$ |
1,217,804 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
490,234 |
|
370,159 |
|
||
Data processing |
|
128,996 |
|
78,865 |
|
||
Amortization |
|
96,030 |
|
75,147 |
|
||
Professional fees |
|
86,143 |
|
78,694 |
|
||
Advertising |
|
84,840 |
|
42,488 |
|
||
Other |
|
554,281 |
|
394,164 |
|
||
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
2,898,242 |
|
$ |
2,257,321 |
|
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased $96,000, or 21.6%, from $446,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, to $350,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. This decrease in income tax expense resulted primarily from a decrease in taxable income. In addition, the effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2005 decreased to 30.3% compared to 32.0% for the first quarter of 2004 as a result of the utilization of investment tax credits.
Asset Quality and Distribution. Total assets increased to $444.0 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $442.1 million at December 31, 2004. Our primary ongoing sources of funds are deposits, proceeds from principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities and proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source
11
of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, competition, and the restructuring of the financial services industry.
Net loans, excluding loans held for sale, decreased $3.0 million to $274.4 million as of March 31, 2005, from $277.4 million as of December 31, 2004. This decline was primarily the result of refinancings and paydowns in our residential mortgage portfolio. Our loan portfolio composition continues to diversify as a result of paydowns and our planned expansion of commercial lending activities. This is evidenced by our one-to-four family residential real estate loans comprising 46.8% of total loans as of December 31, 2004, and 45.7% of total loans as of March 31, 2005.
Our primary investing activities are the origination of mortgage, consumer, and commercial loans and the purchase of investment and mortgage-backed securities. Generally, we originate fixed-rate, residential mortgage loans with maturities in excess of ten years for sale in the secondary market. We do not originate and warehouse these fixed-rate residential loans for resale in order to speculate on interest rates.
The allowance for losses on loans is established through a provision for losses on loans based on our evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of our loan activity. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans with respect to which full collectability may not be reasonably assured, considers the fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical loan loss experience, level of classified loans and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an adequate allowance for losses on loans.
We believe that the quality of the loan portfolio continues to be strong as evidenced by our low levels of past due and non-accrual loans which increased slightly, however, remain relatively low overall. Loans past due more than one month and less than 90 days as of March 31, 2005, totaled $3.2 million, as compared to $1.7 million at December 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005, loans with a balance of $2.4 million were on non-accrual status, or 0.86% of total loans, compared to a balance of $1.1 million loans on non-accrual status, or 0.41% of total loans, as of December 31, 2004. In addition, the ratio of non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets increased from 0.36% as of December 31, 2004, to 0.68% as of March 31, 2005. The increase in non-accrual loans is related to a single borrowing relationship comprised of a pool of residential home loans totaling $1.4 million. While the non-accrual loans and non-performing asset ratios have increased, this increase occurred in the one-to-four family residential loan portfolio. Residential home loans comprised 80.3% of the $2.4 million non-accrual balance at March 31, 2005. These loans have been underwritten according to our residential lending policies and are well secured by real estate collateral, and in many instances, private mortgage insurance or government guarantees. We have historically incurred minimal losses on mortgage loans based upon collateral values and underlying insurance or guarantees. We are aggressively pursuing collection activity of these loans which should enable the collection of principal.
Management believes that there are numerous indications of emerging strength in the economy, including the Federal Open Market Committee raising the target for the Federal Funds rate by 200 basis points since the June 30, 2004, meeting. Even though there are numerous indications of emerging strength, it is not certain that this strength is sustainable. We believe that the allowance for losses on loans at March 31, 2005, was adequate. While we believe that we use the best information available to determine the allowance for losses on loans, unforeseen market conditions could result in adjustment to the allowance for losses on loans. In addition, net earnings could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in establishing the allowance for losses on loans.
Liability Distribution. Total deposits increased $4.3 million to $307.2 million at March 31, 2005, from $302.9 million at December 31, 2004. Borrowings decreased $3.7 million to $90.9 million at March 31, 2005, from $94.6 million at December 31, 2004.
12
Non-interest bearing demand accounts at March 31, 2005, were $27.8 million, or 9.1% of deposits, compared to $28.5 million, or 9.4% of deposits, at December 31, 2004. Money market and NOW demand accounts decreased to $92.4 million at March 31, 2005, from $96.6 million at December 31, 2004, and were 30.1% of total deposits while savings accounts increased to $23.5 million from $23.2 million during the same period. Certificates of deposit increased to $163.4 million at March 31, 2005, from $154.5 million at December 31, 2004.
Certificates of deposit at March 31, 2005, which were scheduled to mature in one year or less, totaled $122.3 million. Historically, maturing deposits have generally remained with our bank and we believe that a significant portion of the deposits maturing in one year or less will remain with us upon maturity.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments. The following table presents our contractual obligations, defined as operating lease obligations and principal payments due on non-deposit obligations with maturities in excess of one year as of March 31, 2005, for the periods indicated.
Contractual Cash |
|
Total |
|
One Year |
|
One to |
|
Four to |
|
More than |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating leases |
|
$ |
275,430 |
|
$ |
67,644 |
|
$ |
103,632 |
|
$ |
100,282 |
|
$ |
|
|
Service contracts |
|
2,080,000 |
|
780,000 |
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
FHLB advances |
|
75,759,727 |
|
5,500,000 |
|
500,000 |
|
42,150,988 |
|
27,608,739 |
|
|||||
Other borrowings |
|
13,383,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,135,000 |
|
8,248,000 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
91,498,157 |
|
$ |
6,347,644 |
|
$ |
1,903,632 |
|
$ |
47,386,270 |
|
$ |
35,856,739 |
|
Liquidity. Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and investment securities available for sale. The level of these assets is dependent on the operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. These liquid assets totaled $145.3 million at March 31, 2005, and $141.4 million at December 31, 2004. During periods in which we are not able to originate a sufficient amount of loans and/or periods of high principal prepayments, we increase our liquid assets by investing in short-term U. S. Government, agency securities, and government sponsored entities or high-grade municipal securities.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of our strategy. Excess funds are generally invested in short-term investments. In the event we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, additional funds are available through the use of FHLB advances, a line of credit with the FHLB or through sales of securities. At March 31, 2005, we had outstanding FHLB advances of $75.7 million and had no borrowings on our line of credit with the FHLB. At March 31, 2005, our total borrowing capacity with the FHLB was $101.9 million. We also had other borrowings of $15.1 million at March 31, 2005, which included $8.2 million of subordinated debentures, $5.1 million of long-term debt and $1.8 million in repurchase agreements.
At March 31, 2005, we had outstanding loan commitments, excluding standby letters of credit, of $41.3 million. We anticipate that sufficient funds will be available to meet current loan commitments. These commitments consist of commercial letters of credit, unfunded lines of credit and commitments to finance real estate loans.
Capital. The Federal Reserve Board has established capital requirements for bank holding companies which generally parallel the capital requirements for national banks under the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulations. The regulations provide that such standards will generally be applied on a consolidated
13
(rather than a bank-only) basis in the case of a bank holding company with more than $150 million in total consolidated assets.
At March 31, 2005, we continued to maintain a sound leverage ratio of 9.8% and a total risk based capital ratio of 16.5%. As shown by the following table, our capital exceeded the minimum capital requirements at March 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Actual |
|
Actual |
|
Required |
|
Required |
|
||
Leverage |
|
$ |
42,209 |
|
9.8 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
$ |
17,246 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
$ |
42,209 |
|
15.4 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
$ |
10,988 |
|
Total Risk Based Capital |
|
$ |
45,224 |
|
16.5 |
% |
8.0 |
% |
$ |
21,977 |
|
At March 31, 2005, our subsidiary bank continued to maintain a sound leverage ratio of 10.8% and a total risk based capital ratio of 18.0%. As shown by the following table, our banks capital exceeded the minimum capital requirements at March 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Actual |
|
Actual |
|
Required |
|
Required |
|
||
Leverage |
|
$ |
46,285 |
|
10.8 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
$ |
17,213 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
$ |
46,285 |
|
16.9 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
$ |
10,960 |
|
Total Risk Based Capital |
|
$ |
49,300 |
|
18.0 |
% |
8.0 |
% |
$ |
21,920 |
|
Banks and bank holding companies are generally expected to operate at or above the minimum capital requirements. The above ratios are well in excess of regulatory minimums and should allow us to operate without capital adequacy concerns. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 establishes a bank rating system based on the capital levels of banks. As of March 31, 2005, we were rated well capitalized, which is the highest rating available under this capital-based rating system.
Effective April 11, 2005, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System amended the risk-based capital standards for bank holding companies to allow the continued inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred securities in the tier 1 capital of bank holding companies, subject to stricter standards. The new regulations limit the amount of trust preferred securities (combined with all other restricted core capital elements) that a bank holding company may include as tier 1 capital to 25% of the sum of all core capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. Amounts in excess of the limits described above generally may be included in tier 2 capital. The regulations also provide a transition period for bank holding companies to conform their capital structures to the revised quantitative limits. These limits will first become applicable to bank holding companies beginning on March 31, 2009. We do not anticipate the amended risk-based capital standards will have a material impact on our capital structures.
14
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. Our assets and liabilities are principally financial in nature and the resulting net interest income thereon is subject to changes in market interest rates and the mix of various assets and liabilities. Interest rates in the financial markets affect our decision on pricing our assets and liabilities which impacts net interest income, a significant cash flow source for us. As a result, a substantial portion of our risk management activities relates to managing interest rate risk.
Our Asset/Liability Management Committee monitors the interest rate sensitivity of our balance sheet using earnings simulation models and interest sensitivity GAP analysis. We have set policy limits of interest rate risk to be assumed in the normal course of business and monitor such limits through our simulation process.
We have been successful in meeting the interest rate sensitivity objectives set forth in our policy. Simulation models are prepared to determine the impact on net interest income for the coming twelve months, including one using rates at March 31, 2005, and forecasting volumes for the twelve-month projection. This position is then subjected to a shift in interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points rising and 100 basis points falling with an impact to our net interest income on a one year horizon as follows:
Scenario |
|
$ change in net interest income |
|
% of net interest income |
|
|
100 basis point rising |
|
$ |
741,000 |
|
6.1 |
% |
200 basis point rising |
|
$ |
1,458,000 |
|
12.0 |
% |
100 basis point falling |
|
$ |
(887,000 |
) |
(7.3 |
)% |
We believe that no significant changes in our interest rate sensitivity position have occurred since March 31, 2005. We also believe we are appropriately positioned for future interest rate movements, although we may experience some fluctuations in net interest income due to short-term timing differences between the repricing of interest-bearing assets and liabilities.
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 - Forward-Looking Statements. This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Companys management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as believe, expect, anticipate, plan, intend, estimate, may, will, would, could, should or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.
Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, the following:
The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct our operations which may be less favorable than expected and may result in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality and value of our assets.
15
The economic impact of past and future terrorist attacks, acts of war or threats thereof, and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks.
The effects of, and changes in, federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies affecting banking, securities, insurance and monetary and financial matters.
The effects of changes in interest rates (including the effects of changes in the rate of prepayments our assets) and the policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Our ability to compete with other financial institutions as effectively as we currently intend due to increases in competitive pressures in the financial services sector.
Our inability to obtain new customers and to retain existing customers.
The timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative delivery channels such as the Internet.
Technological changes implemented by us and by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to us and our customers.
Our ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems.
Our ability to retain key executives and employees and the difficulty that we may experience in replacing key executives and employees in an effective manner.
Consumer spending and saving habits which may change in a manner that affects our business adversely.
Business combinations and the integration of acquired businesses which may be more difficult or expensive than expected.
The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation.
Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
Our ability to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning us and our business, including other factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
16
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March 31, 2005. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls.
17
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None
None
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1 |
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
Exhibit 31.2 |
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
Exhibit 32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Exhibit 32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
18
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 13, 2005 |
/s/ Patrick L. Alexander |
|
|
Patrick L. Alexander |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 13, 2005 |
/s/ Mark A. Herpich |
|
|
Mark A. Herpich |
|
|
Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
19