LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________________To ___________________

Commission file number: 000-31203

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

President Place, 4^th Floor, Cnr. Jan Smuts Avenue and Bolton Road
Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 27-11-343-2000

Not Applicable
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. YES [X] NO [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-
accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act (check one):

[X] Large accelerated filer        [   ] Accelerated filer        [   ] Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). YES [   ] NO [X ]

As of March 31, 2007 (the latest practicable date), 50,877,323 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 6,051,321 shares of the registrant’s special convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, which are convertible into common stock on a one-for-one basis, were outstanding.

Form 10-Q

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Table of Contents

1

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(A) – Derived from audited financial statements

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

2

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
(All amounts stated in thousands of United States Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

1.      Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

          Unaudited Interim Financial Information

          On June 7, 2004, the Company completed a transaction, which is more fully described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006, in which the former shareholders of Net1 Applied Technology Holdings Limited (“Aplitec”), acquired a majority voting interest in the Company. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the Company accounted for the Aplitec transaction as a reverse acquisition, which requires that the company whose shareholders retain a majority voting interest in a combined business be treated as the acquiror for accounting purposes. References to the “Company” refer to Net1 and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Aplitec, unless the context otherwise requires. References to Net1 are references solely to Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc.

          The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all majority-owned subsidiaries over which the Company exercises control and have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Quarterly Results on Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for interim financial reporting. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

          These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, accounting policies and financial notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments), which are necessary for a fair representation of financial results for the interim periods presented.

          Translation of foreign currencies

          The functional currency of the Company is the South African rand, or ZAR, and its reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The current rate method is used to translate the financial statements of the Company to U.S. dollars. Under the current rate method, assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates for the period. Translation gains and losses are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

          Foreign exchange transactions are translated at the spot rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary items are translated at the closing spot rate at the balance sheet date. Transactional gains and losses are recognized in income for the period.

          Recent accounting pronouncements adopted

          In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF 06-3, How Sales Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities should be presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation)(“EITF 06-3”). The scope of EITF 06-3 includes any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue producing transaction between a seller and a customer and may include, but is not limited to, sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes. EITF 06-3 concluded that the presentation of taxes within the scope of EITF 06-3 as either gross (included within revenues and costs) or net (excluded from revenues) is an accounting policy decision that should be disclosed. In addition, for any such taxes that are reported on a gross basis, a company should disclose the amounts of those taxes in interim and annual financial statements for each period for which an income statement is presented if those amounts are significant. The disclosure of those taxes can be done on an aggregate basis. The guidance in EITF 06-3 should be applied to financial reports for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006. On adoption of EITF 06-3, the Company continued to present revenues net of taxes. The adoption of EITF 06-03 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows or financial statement disclosure.

5

1.      Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

          Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of March 31, 2007

          In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of the adoption of FAS 157 on its overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

          In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“FAS 159”). FAS 159 requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily understand the effect of the company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. It also requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. FAS 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements included in FAS 157. FAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the Company’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the Company makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of FAS 157. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of the adoption of FAS 157 on its overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

          In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 requires recognition of tax benefits that satisfy a greater than 50% probability threshold. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of FIN 48 will have on its financial statements.

          In November 2006, the EITF reached consensus on EITF No. 06-9, Reporting a Change in (or the Elimination of) a Previously Existing Difference between the Fiscal Year-End of a Parent Company and That of a Consolidated Entity or between the Reporting Period of an Investor and That of an Equity Method Investee (EITF 06-9). The EITF reached a consensus that a change in a subsidiary’s or equity method investee’s reporting period is a change in accounting principle. Therefore, the parent or investor should recognize the effects of the change through retrospective application to all prior periods presented pursuant to Statement 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. The adoption of EITF 06-9 by the Company is not expected to have an impact on its overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

2.      Acquisitions

          Prism

          On July 3, 2006, the Company acquired the entire issued and outstanding share capital of Prism Holdings Limited (“Prism”) for ZAR1.16 per share (approximately $0.16, at the USD:ZAR exchange rate as of July 3, 2006) for a total consideration of $95.2 million which was paid in cash. On September 13, 2006, the Company reported the pro-forma effects of the transaction on an amended Form 8-K with the SEC.

          Prism is a company focused on the development and provision of secure transaction technology, solutions and services. Prism’s core competencies around secure online transaction processing, cryptography and integrated circuit card (chip/smart card) technologies are principally applied to electronic commerce transactions in the telecommunications, banking, retail, petroleum and utilities market sectors. These technologies form the cornerstones of what Prism calls the “trusted transactions” environment and provide Prism with the building blocks for developing secure end-to-end payment solutions.

          The Company acquired Prism because it fits in well within its strategy, particularly in South Africa. On July 3, 2006, Prism owned a 74.9% interest in EasyPay (Proprietary) Limited (“EasyPay”), the largest bank-independent financial switch, or transaction processor, in South Africa. Effective October 1, 2006, Prism acquired the remaining 25.1% interest in EasyPay. This transaction is discussed in more detail below.

6

2.      Acquisitions (continued)

          Prism (continued)

          During fiscal 2006, EasyPay processed approximately 358 million transactions on behalf of retailers, bill issuers and financial institutions. The bulk of these transactions were acquired through a base of around 50,000 customer owned terminals, the majority of which are installed at all the retail locations of South Africa’s two largest retailers, who have approximately 65% of the South African retail market share between them. Prism has also developed a core competency in mobile communications and licenses its intellectual property to manufacturers of Global System for Mobile Communication (“GSM”) Subscriber Identity Module (“SIM”) cards and mobile operators.

          Prism has developed a number of innovative payment technologies for mobile phones including Virtual Top-up (“VTU”) that enables individuals to purchase any amount of mobile airtime and resell this airtime from their phones to other mobile phones without the need for additional authorization codes or physical vouchers. The addition of customers that engage Prism to provide switching services may extend the Company’s merchant acquiring footprint in South Africa from the deep rural areas, where it is active today, to the urban environment. The Company intends to upgrade the 50,000 terminals that form part of Prism’s network to accommodate its biometric-based UEPS technology, which will significantly enhance its wage payment program once it launches that service. The Company will also be able to capitalize on the convergence of technologies such as the mobile phone, UEPS and banking whereby it will be able to provide transacting and financial services to all segments of the population, regardless of their financial status or place of residence. In addition, the Company will continue with its strategy as a significant participant in the switching and settlement of formal credit and debit card transactions on behalf of formal banks and large retailers.

          The following table sets forth the amount paid for Prism using exchange rates applicable as of July 3, 2006:

          The following table sets forth the final allocation of the purchase price using exchange rates applicable as of July 3, 2006:

          The purchase price allocation was based on an independent appraisal and management estimates as of March 31, 2007 and may be adjusted up to one year following the closing of the transaction.

          The results of Prism’s operations, including 74.9% of EasyPay, are reflected in the Company’s financial statements from July 3, 2006.

EasyPay

          The remaining 25.1% interest in EasyPay was acquired by Prism effective October 1, 2006 for $8.8 million, at the USD:ZAR exchange rate as of October 1, 2006. The Company’s management believes the acquisition of the remaining 25.1% of EasyPay will enable the Company to pursue its strategy related to the Prism acquisition as it eliminates the consideration of minority interest.

7

2.      Acquisitions (continued)

          EasyPay (continued)

          The following table sets forth the amount paid for EasyPay using exchange rates applicable as of October 1, 2006:

          FAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“FAS 141”) requires the acquisition of some or all of the noncontrolling equity interests in a subsidiary, whether acquired by the parent, the subsidiary itself, or another affiliate, to be accounted for using the purchase method. Accordingly the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired were determined by management as of October 1, 2006. The following table sets forth the preliminary allocation of the purchase price using exchange rates applicable as of October 1, 2006:

          The purchase price allocation was based on management estimates as of December 31, 2006 and may be adjusted up to one year following the closing of the transaction.

          The results of the remaining 25.1% of EasyPay’s operations acquired effective October 1, 2006 are reflected in the Company’s financial statements from October 1, 2006.

          The purchase price of $8.8 million, translated at exchange rates prevailing on October 1, 2006, was paid in January 2007.

3.      Pre-funded social welfare grants receivable

          The pre-funded social welfare grants receivable represents the amounts due from provincial governments, as the Company pre-funds social welfare grant payments on behalf of the government in these provinces. The pre-funded amounts are typically reimbursed to the Company within two weeks after the disbursement of the grants. The grant payment service normally commences during the week before the start of a calendar month at government pay points and merchant locations. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, the April payment service commenced during the last three days of March 2007 and was offered at government pay points and at merchant locations.

4.      Deferred expenditure on smart cards

          The deferred expenditure on smart cards represents amounts paid for smart cards used in the administration and distribution of grants to beneficiaries. These expenditures are deferred and written off over the period of the contract with the provincial government.

8

5.      Equity-accounted investments

          During the three months ended March 31, 2007 the Company acquired a 50% interest in the issued and outstanding ordinary share capital and loans of VTU De Colombia S.A. (“VTU Colombia”). In addition, the Company has a 43.16% interest in the issued and outstanding ordinary share capital and loans of Permit Group 2 (Pty) Ltd (“Permit”) and a 50% interest in the issued and outstanding ordinary share capital and loans of SmartSwitch Namibia (Pty) Ltd (“SmartSwitch Namibia”) and SmartSwitch Botswana (Pty) Limited (“SmartSwitch Botswana”). The Company has sold hardware, software and/or licenses to SmartSwitch Namibia, SmartSwitch Botswana and VTU Colombia and defers recognition of 50% of the net income after tax related to these sales until SmartSwitch Namibia, SmartSwitch Botswana and VTU Colombia has used the purchased asset or has sold it to a third party. The deferral of the net income after tax is shown in the Elimination column in the table below.

          The functional currency of the Company’s equity-accounted investments is not the U.S. dollar and thus the investments are restated at the period end U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rate with an entry against accumulated other comprehensive income. The functional currency of Permit is the South African rand, the functional currency of SmartSwitch Namibia is the Namibian dollar, the functional currency of SmartSwitch Botswana is the Botswana pula and the functional currency of VTU Colombia is the Colombian peso.

          Summarized below is the Company’s interest in equity-accounted investments as of March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006:

9

5.      Equity-accounted investments (continued)

          (1) – the foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the South African rand and the U.S. dollar. 
          (2) – the foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the Namibian dollar and the U.S. dollar, except for the foreign currency adjustment for loan balance which represents the effects of the fluctuations between the South African rand and the U.S. dollar. 
          (3) – the foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the Botswana pula and the U.S. dollar, except for the foreign currency adjustment for loan balance which represents the effects of the fluctuations between the South African rand and the U.S. dollar. 
          (4) – the foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the Colombia peso and the U.S. dollar. 
          (5) – the sum of the earnings (loss) from equity accounted investment represents the amount presented on the earnings from equity accounted investments line in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 2007. 
          (6) – the sum of the earnings (loss) from equity accounted investment represents the amount presented on the earnings from equity accounted investments line in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended March 2007. 
          (7) – includes the elimination of unrealized net income as described below.

          As the Company owns 50% of SmartSwitch Namibia, SmartSwitch Botswana VTU Colombia, respectively, it is required to eliminate 50% of the net income generated from sales to SmartSwitch Namibia and SmartSwitch Botswana. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 the Company sold a license to VTU Colombia. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company sold hardware and software to SmartSwitch Botswana. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, the Company sold software to SmartSwitch Botswana. The revenue generated and associated costs related to these sales are included in the line item captions above net income from continuing operations before minority interest and earnings (loss) from equity-accounted investments in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. The realized amount related to the elimination is included in the earnings (loss) from equity-accounted investments line in the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. The Company will recognize this net income from these hardware and software sales during the period in which the hardware and software it has sold to SmartSwitch Namibia, SmartSwitch Botswana and VTU Colombia are utilized in its operations, or has been sold to third party customers, as the case may be.

10

6.      Goodwill and intangible assets

          On July 3, 2006, the Company acquired the entire issued and outstanding share capital of Prism for ZAR1.16 per share (approximately $0.16, at the USD:ZAR exchange rate as of July 3, 2006) for a total consideration of $95.2 million which was paid in cash. The goodwill associated with the acquisition of Prism and the remaining 25.1% of EasyPay represents the excess of cost over the fair value of acquired net assets. The goodwill is not deductible for taxation purposes. See note 2 for the allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of acquired net assets.

          Goodwill

          The goodwill associated with the acquisition of Prism and the remaining 25.1% of EasyPay has been allocated to the Company’s reportable segments, as follows:

          Summarized below is the movement in carrying value of goodwill for the nine months ended March 31, 2007.

          (1) – the foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the South African rand and the U.S. dollar on the carrying value.

          Summarized below is the movement in the carrying value of goodwill for the year ended June 30, 2006.

          (1) – the foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the South African rand and the U.S. dollar on the carrying value.

          As required by FAS 141 goodwill has been allocated to the Company’s reportable segments as follows:

11

6.      Goodwill and intangible assets (continued) Intangible assets

          Summarized below are the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, translated at the exchange rate applicable as of July 3, 2006, and the weighted-average amortization period of these intangible assets:

          A deferred tax liability of $10.3 million, at exchange rates applicable as of July 3, 2006, was recognized on the acquisition date related to the intangible assets acquired.

          Summarized below are the fair value of the intangible assets related to the remaining 25.1% of EasyPay acquired, translated at the exchange rate applicable as of October 1, 2006, and the weighted-average amortization period of these intangible assets:

          A deferred tax liability of $1.2 million, at exchange rates applicable as of October 1, 2006, was recognized on October 1, 2006 related to the intangible assets acquired.

          Summarized below is the carrying value and accumulated amortization of the intangible assets as of March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006:

          Aggregate amortization expense on the finite-lived intangible assets for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $1.7 million and $5.2 million, respectively (three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 was approximately $0.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively). Future annual amortization expense is estimated at approximately $6.7 million, however, this amount could differ from the actual amortization as a result of changes in useful lives and other relevant factors.

12

7.      Short-term facilities

          As a result of utilizing approximately $95.2 million of its cash to acquire Prism on July 3, 2006, the Company was required, from time to time, to draw down on its short-term facilities in order to meet its obligations to distribute social welfare grants. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had short-term facilities of approximately $92.6 million, translated at exchange rates applicable as of March 31, 2007. The interest rates applicable to these short-term facilities range from the South African prime overdraft rate (12.5% per annum at March 31, 2007) to the South African prime overdraft rate less 225 basis points. The Company’s management believes its current short-term facilities are adequate in order to meet its future obligations to distribute social welfare grants.

          On March 30, 2007, a duplicate payment of approximately $18.8 million was erroneously deposited into the Company’s bank account. The amount was remitted to the sender on April 5, 2007. This amount is not included in our cash and cash equivalents and other payables as of March 31, 2007, and has not been included in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007.

8.      Capital structure and creditor rights attached to the B Class Loans

          As described in Note 10 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included within the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s balance sheet reflects two classes of equity - common stock and linked units.

          During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, 394,095 and 1,263,778 shares of special convertible preferred stock were converted to common stock. The trigger events that gave rise to these conversions were requests by linked unit-holders to sell and/or convert 2,903,857 and 9,312,046 linked units during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007. The net result of these conversions was that 2,903,857 and 9,312,046 B class preference shares and B class loans were ceded to Net1 during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, which converted 394,095 and 1,263,778 shares of special convertible preferred stock to 394,095 and 1,263,778 common stock in return for the ownership of 2,903,857 and 9,312,046 B class preferred shares and B class loans. As a result of the conversion, the number of outstanding shares of common stock has increased by 1,263,778 and the number of outstanding shares of special convertible preferred stock has decreased by 1,263,778. In addition, as a consequence of the conversion, Net1 now owns 192,388,481 B class preferred shares and B class loans. The reduction in the B class preference shares from $0.009 million to $0.007 million is due to the cession to Net1 of the B class preference shares as a result of the trigger events.

9.      Earnings per share

          The entire consolidated net income of the Company is attributable to the shareholders of the Company comprising both the holders of Net1 common stock and the holders of linked units. As described in Note 10 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included within the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, the linked units have the same rights and entitlements as those attached to common shares.

          As the linked units owned by holders, other than the Company, are exchangeable for special convertible preferred stock at the ratio of 7.37:1, which is then converted to common stock at the ratio of 1:1, the basic earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2007, for the common stock and linked units are the same and is calculated by dividing the net income by the combined weighted average number (56.9 million) of common stock (50.8 million) and special convertible preferred stock (6.1 million) in issue. Diluted earnings per share has been calculated to give effect to the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if the potential dilutive instruments had been issued in each period.

          The basic earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2006, for the common stock and linked units are the same and is calculated by dividing the net income by the combined number (56.7 million) of common stock (48.0 million) and special convertible preferred stock (8.7 million) in issue. Included in the weighted average number of shares in issue to calculate earnings and diluted earnings per share were 1,538,794 shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Company’s August 2005 public offering.

          The basic earnings per share for the nine months ended March 31, 2007, for the common stock and linked units are the same and is calculated by dividing the net income by the combined weighted average number (56.9 million) of common stock (50.8 million) and special convertible preferred stock (6.1 million) in issue.

          The basic earnings per share for the nine months ended March 31, 2006, for the common stock and linked units are the same and is calculated by dividing the net income by the combined weighted average number (56.4 million) of common stock (47.8 million) and special convertible preferred stock (8.6 million) in issue. Included in the weighted average number of shares in issue to calculate earnings and diluted earnings per share were 1,538,794 shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Company’s August 2005 public offering.

13

9.      Earnings per share (continued)

          The following tables detail the weighted average number of outstanding shares used for the calculation of earnings per share for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

10.     Comprehensive income

          The Company’s comprehensive income consists of net income and foreign currency translation gains and losses which, under GAAP, are excluded from net income. Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was:

14

11.      Share-based payments

          Stock options

               Options granted under 2004 Stock Incentive Plan

          In 2004, all stock options available for grant under the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) were granted to the Company’s directors, officers, other employees and other eligible participants as non-qualified stock options. Of these options, 20% became exercisable on the date of grant, and 20% of the remaining options become exercisable on first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. The options expire ten years from date of grant. Under the rules governing the stock options, those stock options held by persons other than directors and executive officers are automatically exercised on the date they first become exercisable, with payment upon exercise provided by a loan from the Company to the option holder. Such loans are on a recourse basis and bear interest at market rates. Stock options held by directors and executive officers are not automatically exercised when they first become exercisable and no loan is extended for the payment for the exercise price upon exercise. All shares acquired upon exercise, whether held by directors, executive officers or others, may only be sold eleven months after they become exercisable, except as otherwise permitted by the Company’s Remuneration Committee.

          On December 1, 2006, the shareholders of the Company approved the amendment and restatement the Plan to increase, by 2,845,600 shares, the number of shares issuable under the Plan and to make other administrative revisions. On August 24, 2006, the Company granted 569,120 options at an exercise price of $22.51 to employees of the Company, subject to the approval of the increase in the number of shares issuable under the Plan which was approved on December 1, 2006. These options become exercisable over a period of four and three quarter years commencing May 8, 2007. The period during which the options become exercisable are presented in the table below. The Company believes that it is reasonably likely that the employees will exercise the options as they become exercisable. Any unexercised options granted to the employee expire on August 24, 2016. The options were valued using the Cox Ross Rubinstein binomial model using the following assumptions:

          The estimated expected volatility was calculated based on the volatilities of similar listed companies within the payment processing industry. Using the Cox Ross Rubinstein binomial model, the fair value of these options on the grant date was approximately $3.0 million. There are no tax consequences related to these options.

     Awards that expire or are cancelled without delivery of shares generally become available for issuance under the Plan.

               Other stock options

          In January 2006, 200,000 non-qualified stock options were issued at an exercise price of $30.71 per option to a new employee of the Company. The employee resigned on September 13, 2006 and because none of these options had become exercisable prior to the resignation date, the compensation charge of approximately $0.2 million included in additional paid in capital and retained earnings has been reversed. In addition, the deferred tax asset and associated valuation allowance related to the 200,000 stock options has been reversed.

15

11.      Share-based payments (continued)

          Stock options (continued)

               Options granted to employees of Prism

          In August 2006, 904,674 non-qualified stock options were issued at an exercise price of $22.51 per option to employees of Prism. These options become exercisable over a period of four and three quarter years commencing May 8, 2007. The period during which the options become exercisable are presented in the table below. The Company believes that it is reasonably likely that the Prism employees will exercise the options one year after the option becomes exercisable. Any unexercised options granted to the employee expire on August 24, 2016. The options were valued using the Cox Ross Rubinstein binomial model using the following assumptions:

          The estimated expected volatility was calculated based on the volatilities of similar listed companies within the payment processing industry. Using the Cox Ross Rubinstein binomial model, the fair value of these options on the grant date was approximately $5.7 million. Management has estimated forfeitures based on historic employee behavior under similar compensation plans. There are no tax consequences related to these options.

          During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, Prism employee resignations and terminations resulted in forfeitures of 113,872 and 237,954 options, respectively.

          The Company has recorded a net stock compensation charge of $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, which comprised:

          The stock compensation charge and benefit have been allocated to cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support and general and administration based on the allocation of the cash compensation paid to the employees.

          As of March 31, 2007, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options was approximately $7.8 million, which the Company expects to recognize over approximately 4.25 years. As of March 31, 2007, the interest due from employees related to loans extended to fund stock option exercises was approximately $0.04 million.

16

11.     Share-based payments (continued)

          Activity under the Plan, the options granted to the new employee in January 2006 and options granted to Prism employees for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is summarized as follows:

          During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the following activity occurred under the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan:

          No stock awards became exercisable during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

          In September 2006, the Company received approximately $0.05 million from an employee exercising stock options. The Company does not anticipate receiving any tax benefits from the exercise of options by employees.

          The Company issues new shares to satisfy stock option exercises.

17

12.     Operating segments

          The Company discloses segment information in accordance with FAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which requires companies to determine and review their segments as reflected in the management information systems reports that their managers use in making decisions and to report certain entity-wide disclosures about products and services, major customers, and the material countries in which the entity holds assets and reports revenues.

          The Company currently has four reportable segments each of which operates mainly within South Africa: Transaction-based activities, Smart card accounts, Financial services and Hardware, software and related technology sales. The Company’s reportable segments offer different products and services and require different resources and marketing strategies and share the Company’s assets. The operations of Prism have been allocated to two of the existing reportable segments of the Company as the chief operating decision maker has currently been analyzing the business on this basis.

          The Transaction-based activities segment currently consists mainly of a state pension and welfare benefit distribution service provided to provincial governments in South Africa and transaction processing for retailers, utilities and banks. Fee income is earned based on the number of beneficiaries included in the government pay-file as well as from merchants and card holders using the Company’s merchant retail application. In addition, utility providers and bankers are charged a fee for transaction processing services performed on their behalf at retailers. This segment has individually significant customers that each provides more than 10% of the total revenue of the Company. For each of the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, there were three such customers, providing 29%, 21% and 16%, and 33%, 16% and 14%, respectively, of total revenue (each of the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006: three such customers, providing 44%, 24% and 14% and 37%, 19% and 11%, respectively, of total revenue).

          The Smart card accounts segment derives revenue from the provision of smart card accounts, as a fixed monthly fee per card is charged for the maintenance of these accounts.

          The Financial services segment derives revenue from the provision of short-term personal lending activities and life insurance products. Interest income is recognized in the income statement as it falls due, using the interest method by reference to the constant interest rate stated in each loan agreement.

          The Hardware, software-related and technology sales segment markets, sells and implements the Universal Electronic Payment System (“UEPS”) as well as develops and provides Prism secure transaction technology, solutions and services. The segment undertakes smart card system implementation projects, delivering hardware, software and business solutions in the form of customized systems. Sales of hardware, SIM cards, cryptography services, and SIM card licenses are recorded within this segment. This segment also generates rental income from hardware provided to merchants enrolled in the Company’s merchant retail application. Sales to SmartSwitch Nigeria Limited and the related taxation implications are not reflected in revenue to external customers, operating income, income taxation expense or net income after taxation presented in the tables below.

          Corporate/Eliminations includes the Company’s head office cost centers in addition to the elimination of inter-segment transactions.

18

12.     Operating segments (continued)

          The Company evaluates segment performance based on operating income. The following tables summarize segment information which is prepared in accordance with GAAP:

19

12.     Operating segments (continued)

          The segment information as reviewed by the chief operating decision maker does not include a measure of segment assets per segment as all of the significant assets are used in the operations of all, rather than any one, of the segments. The Company does not have dedicated assets assigned to a particular operating segment. Accordingly, it is not meaningful to attempt an arbitrary allocation and segment asset allocation is therefore not presented.

13.     Costs related to public offering and Nasdaq listing

          The Company completed a public offering and Nasdaq listing in August 2005. The Company incurred the following costs in connection with this transaction during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006.

          The Other category includes costs to date related to venue hire, travel, bank charges and other miscellaneous expenses related to the public offering and Nasdaq listing. All costs related to the public offering are non-deductible for taxation purposes.

          Underwriting discounts and commissions of $2.4 million were incurred relating to underwriters exercising their over allotment option. The discounts and commissions have been charged directly to additional paid-in capital.

20

14.     Income tax in interim periods

          For the purposes of interim financial reporting, the Company determines the appropriate income tax provision in accordance with the guidance in APB Opinion 28, Interim Reporting, and FASB Interpretation No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods. Accordingly, the tax charge is calculated by first applying the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year to ordinary income. This amount is then adjusted for the tax effect of significant unusual or extraordinary items that are reported separately, and have an impact on the tax charge. The cumulative effect of any change in the enacted tax rate on the opening balance of deferred tax assets and liabilities is also included in the tax charge as a discrete event in the interim period in which the enactment date occurs.

          For the three and nine month ended March 31, 2007, the tax charge was calculated using the expected effective tax rate for the year (36.89%) and our effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 is 38.2% and 38.5%, respectively.

21

          Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

          The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. On June 7, 2004, we completed a transaction, which we more fully describe in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 in which the former shareholders of Net1 Applied Technology Holdings Limited, or Aplitec, acquired a majority voting interest in us. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, we accounted for the Aplitec transaction as a reverse acquisition, which requires that the company whose shareholders retain a majority voting interest in a combined business be treated as the acquiror for accounting purposes. References to “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Net1 and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Aplitec, unless the context otherwise requires. When we refer to Net1, we are referring solely to Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc.

Forward-looking statements

          Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed, implied or inferred by these forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, those listed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

          Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not know whether we can achieve positive future results, levels of activity, performance, or goals. Actual events or results may differ materially. We undertake no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to conform those statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by applicable law.

          You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents that we reference herein and the documents we have filed as exhibits hereto and which we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission completely and with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Overview

          We provide our universal electronic payment system technology as an alternative payment system to the un-banked and under-banked populations of developing economies. We believe that we are the first company worldwide to implement a system that can enable the estimated four billion people who generally have limited or no access to a bank account to effect affordably electronic transactions with one another, government agencies, employers, merchants and other financial services providers. To do this, we have developed and deployed the universal electronic payment system, or UEPS. This system uses secure smart cards that operate in real time but offline, unlike traditional payment systems offered by major banking institutions that require immediate access through a communications network to a centralized computer. This offline capability means that users of our system can enter into transactions at any time with other card holders in even the most remote areas so long as a portable offline card reader is available. In addition to payments and purchases, our system can be used for banking, health care management, international money transfers, voting and identification.

          South Africa is the first major market where we achieved significant success and a high penetration rate in the areas we targeted. We believe that our operating experience in South Africa demonstrates the success of our business model in a developing economy. According to estimates made by Statistics South Africa, or StatsSA, as of mid-2006, South Africa has a population of approximately 47.4 million people, of which an estimated 50% live below the poverty line. As of September 2006, StatsSA estimated that the South African unemployment rate is approximately 25.5% . The success we have achieved in South Africa since commencing operations in December 1997 has primarily resulted from servicing the needs of the poorest section of the population – those who are dependent on government social welfare grants. We have designed and implemented a complete business model involving the payment, and subsequent spending, of these grants through our smart cards and UEPS technology, which provides us with the opportunity to earn multiple sources of revenue and provides our card holders with affordable functionality and lifestyle improvement. The South African government is also actively involved in a number of initiatives which may present us with opportunities to export our South African achievements, such as the New Partnership for Africa’s Development and the India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum, which is currently considering the establishment of an economic trade bloc between these three countries.

22

          In July 2004, we began a major drive to install point of service, or POS, devices at merchants located in rural areas where the majority of our card holders spend their social welfare grants. The ability of our card holders to load their grants at these retailers and to spend these grants securely on goods and services, without the need to withdraw the full amount in cash, represents one of the basic underlying principles of the UEPS functionality. We believe that the installation of these POS devices has resulted in a significant improvement in the lifestyle of our card holders, while introducing a new revenue source for us in the form of merchant acquiring and other transaction fees. Use of the POS devices also lowers our costs by reducing the amount of cash we need to deliver to social welfare beneficiaries in cash at our mobile pay points. We discuss the progress of our merchant acquiring efforts since implementation of these efforts under “—Progress of Our Merchant Acquiring System.”

          In July 2006, we acquired Prism Holdings Limited, or Prism, which owns EasyPay (Proprietary) Limited, or EasyPay, the largest bank-independent financial switch, or transaction processor, in Southern Africa. The bulk of the 358 million transactions processed by EasyPay during the year ended June 30, 2006, on behalf of retailers, bill issuers and financial institutions were transacted through a base of around 50,000 customer owned terminals, the majority of which are installed at all the retail locations of South Africa’s two largest retailers, who have approximately 65% of the South African retail market share between them. The addition of the Prism merchant acquiring network will extend our footprint in South Africa from the deep rural areas, where we are active today, to the urban environment. We intend to upgrade, where appropriate, the 50,000 terminals that form part of Prism’s network to accommodate our biometric-based UEPS technology, which will significantly enhance our wage payment program once we launch that service.

          We believe that the acquisition of Prism will also help us extend our ability to deliver solutions across the entire spectrum of transaction processing and assist us in expanding our international operations throughout Africa, Asia and Europe. The results of Prism’s operations are reflected in our financial statements from July 3, 2006. We have also begun to explore strategic partnership and business opportunities across the Americas. For example, we are in the process of launching a Virtual Top-up, or “VTU”, solution in Colombia.

          The implementation of new UEPS systems, particularly in developing economies outside our current markets, is a vital component of our future growth. We have implemented or are in the process of implementing our systems on the African continent outside South Africa. During fiscal 2006, we formed joint ventures with government entities and financial institutions to operate UEPS smart card-based switching systems in Namibia, Botswana and Nigeria. These joint ventures, which are described in more detail under “—International Expansion,” are in various stages of development and operation.

Seasonality of Transaction-based Activities

          We experience seasonality in our transaction-based activities operating segment. Our beneficiaries are able to load their grants onto their cards as soon as the grant payment file is activated, which typically happens during the week preceding the commencement of a calendar month. We recognize the fee revenue related to the distribution of welfare grants when the beneficiaries load the grants to their cards. The general exception to this rule is the January payment cycle, when the activation of the payment file is done on a limited basis at merchant locations only. As a result, the revenue recognized in the second quarter of our fiscal year is generally lower than the other three quarters due to the limited number of grants distributed during the last week of December. The activation of the payment file for any month also depends on whether the first calendar day of a month is a weekday, or a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday.

South African Provincial Contracts

          We currently derive the majority of our revenues from our contracts with various South African provincial governments. The South African national government passed legislation in 2004 for the creation of the South African Social Security Agency, or SASSA. The primary purpose of SASSA is to consolidate at the central government level the administration of social welfare grants. SASSA commenced operations on April 1, 2006.

          On January 31, 2007 we received official notification from SASSA that our five existing contracts, which expired at the end of December 2006, have been extended until March 31, 2008. In February 2007 SASSA issued a request to submit proposals for the provision of payments services to social assistance grant recipients, or RFP. Pursuant to the RFP, potential bidders are invited to submit proposals for the provision of a payment service to social welfare grant recipients on province-by-province basis or for all of South Africa's nine provinces. According to the RFP, submissions of proposals were due by May 4, 2007, and the final evaluation process will be completed by July 13, 2007. Implementation of the new contract will commence on April 1, 2008. On May 4, 2007 we filed proposals for each of South Africa’s nine provinces, as well as a proposal for the entire country.

          We believe that our successful record with our provincial government contracts will provide us with a good opportunity to benefit from the transition to national administration of social welfare grants because we may be able to obtain contracts to distribute grants in provinces with which we do not currently have a contractual relationship. However,

23

there is a chance that the national tender could lead to our losing one or more of our current contracts if SASSA decides to appoint a single (or other) contractor to provide social welfare grant distribution and we are not chosen. During this transition period our existing provincial government contracts will continue to be governed by their respective terms.

Progress of Our Merchant Acquiring System

          We have completed the installation of our POS terminals at the majority of those merchant locations we deem the most important to service the bulk of our cardholder base. The productivity of the existing terminal base continues to improve, as is evident from the increase in the number of transactions processed per POS terminal installed. We believe that the existing terminal base has reached or is close to saturation and do not expect significant growth in future. Our ongoing POS deployment plan is now focused on secondary locations and retailers, where we will install fewer terminals over a longer period of time. The acquisition of EasyPay provides us with potential access to an existing terminal base of approximately 50,000 customer owned terminals, the majority of which are situated in retailers in the urban and semi-urban areas of South Africa. These 50,000 terminals were acquired from Prism in prior periods and are owned by the retailers. In order for these terminals to become UEPS enabled, we will need to equip these terminals with biometric readers and install our UEPS software. We have already successfully demonstrated the integration of the biometric readers to the major retailers and we are currently negotiating the commercial terms and conditions of implementing the biometric solution.

          The key statistics and indicators of our merchant acquiring system on a quarterly basis during the last 18 months in each of the South African provinces where we distribute social welfare grants are summarized in the table below:

(1) NC = Northern Cape, EC = Eastern Cape, KZN = KwaZulu-Natal, L = Limpopo, NW = North West.
(2) Refers to events occurring during the quarter (i.e., based on three calendar months).
(3) Refers to events occurring during the completed pay cycle. As discussed above under “-Overview - Seasonality of Transaction-based Activities” the grant payment file is typically activated during the week preceding the commencement of a calendar month.

24

          The following chart presents the number of POS devices installed and the average spend per POS device, per pay cycle, during the 15 month period ended March 31, 2007:

          The following chart presents the number of POS devices installed and the average spend per POS device, per calendar month, during the 15 month period ended March 31, 2007:

25

          The following chart presents the growth in the value of loads at merchant locations and the transactions (expenditures) processed through our installed base of POS devices, per pay cycle, during the 15 month period ended March 31, 2007:

          The following chart presents the growth in the value of loads at merchant locations and the transactions (expenditures), per calendar month, processed through our installed base of POS devices during the 15 month period ended March 31, 2007:

26

          The following graph presents the number of social welfare grants loaded at merchant locations, per pay cycle, for the 15 month period ended March 31, 2007:

          The following graph presents the number of social welfare grants loaded at merchant locations, per calendar month, for the 15 month period ended March 31, 2007:

27

International Expansion

               Namibia

          We own 50% of SmartSwitch Namibia (Proprietary) Limited, or SmartSwitch Namibia, and the other 50% is owned by Namibia Post Limited, or NamPost, a government entity which provides post office and banking services across Namibia. SmartSwitch Namibia operates a national UEPS smart card-based switching and settlement system in Namibia and provided NamPost with a UEPS banking platform. The UEPS system will also be offered to employers, retailers, medical insurance companies and other government institutions.

          The system, the first of its kind in Namibia, is intended to improve the banking system in the country. NamPost, as the first customer of the switch, is expected to increase its market share in the financial services arena and position itself as the leading service provider for the un-banked and under-banked citizens of Namibia. NamPost has informed us that as of March 31, 2007, it had acquired 57,595 new clients as a direct result of the implementation of the UEPS technology.

          As of March 31, 2007, SmartSwitch Namibia has activated 164,657 UEPS smart cards and has signed up 137 merchants to accept the UEPS smart cards. SmartSwitch Namibia has launched our UEPS-based prepaid electricity system with Payzone, a Namibian-based company that distributes electricity on behalf of the Windhoek Town Council. This solution will facilitate the sale of prepaid electricity in rural and urban areas using the UEPS system to secure, authenticate and collect payments on behalf of the participating municipalities.

          Phase 1 of the project involves the transfer of all of NamPost’s banking products to the smart card, offering affordability, security, simplicity and flexibility. Negotiations are currently underway with other financial institutions and companies that wish to participate as customers of SmartSwitch Namibia. Through SmartSwitch Namibia, NamPost is currently expanding its offering to include medical identification and life insurance sales and premium collection. Negotiations with the service providers are at an advanced stage. We expect the suite of smart card applications to include banking, retail, money transfers, third party bill payments, wages and social security grants.

          During the third quarter of fiscal 2007 we completed the development of NamPost’s investment products including “Save as you Earn”, “Saving Certificates” and Fixed Term Deposits which we expect will be used by local and foreign depositors.

          As we own 50% of SmartSwitch Namibia, we are required under US GAAP to eliminate 50% of the net income generated from sales to SmartSwitch Namibia. In accordance with US GAAP, we will recognize this net income from these hardware and software sales during the period in which the hardware and software we have sold to SmartSwitch Namibia is utilized in its operations, or has been sold to third party customers, as the case may be.

          SmartSwitch Namibia officially commenced operations during February 2006. During the year ended June 30, 2006, software and hardware were made available for collection to SmartSwitch Namibia and we have recognized net income related to these software and hardware sales during the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2007.

               Botswana

          During the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we formed SmartSwitch Botswana (Proprietary) Limited, or SmartSwitch Botswana, to launch and operate a national UEPS smart card-based switching and settlement system in Botswana. We own 50% of the company and the other 50% is owned by Capricorn Investment Holdings (Botswana) Proprietary Limited, or Capricorn, which owns 100% of Botswana-based Bank Gaborone Limited and the majority holding in a number of financial services companies operating in Botswana.

          We believe that SmartSwitch Botswana will be the first system of its kind in Botswana and we expect that it will have a substantial impact on the financial industry in Botswana. Capricorn, as the first user of the UEPS technology in Botswana, has advised us that it believes that it can substantially increase its market share in the financial services industry and position its group as the front runner in serving the un-banked and under-banked citizens of Botswana. The initial smart card applications offered to Capricorn’s customer base will include banking and a suite of financial services and products such as micro-finance, short- and long-term insurance, health care, third party deductions, third party payments, money transfers, wage payments and retail.

          Together with Capricorn we have capitalized SmartSwitch Botswana with approximately $2.4 million (BWP 15.4 million, at June 30, 2006, foreign exchange rates), in start-up capital and loans, which was contributed equally by both parties. The proceeds will be utilized by SmartSwitch Botswana for the acquisition of hardware and software from us and for general working capital purposes.

28

          In February 2007 SmartSwitch Botswana entered into a Micro Lender Deductions Service Level Agreement with Lesaka Information Technology Services (Proprietary) Limited, or LITS. LITS has been contracted by the Government of Botswana in the capacity of a Central Loan Registry to facilitate the following functions:

• receiving loan approval requests from accredited micro financiers that are LITS-accredited micro financiers that provide loans to employees of the Government of Botswana, or Micro Financiers, and have procured the services of LITS and/ or SmartSwitch Botswana ;
• screening and vetting of loan applications in terms of established loan criteria and onward transmission of approvals or repudiations to the Micro Financiers;
• receiving monthly loan deduction requests from Micro Financiers;
• testing monthly deduction files to ensure compliance with the rules by the Micro Financiers;
• onward transmission of monthly deduction files to the Ministry of Finance and Development Planning, or MFDP;
• receiving payment of the monthly deductions from the MFDP; and
• reconciling the monthly deduction payment from MFDP for onward payment to the respective Micro Financiers.

          SmartSwitch Botswana has been appointed by LITS as its technology service provider to provide the technology needed to perform these functions.

          During the three months ended March 31, 2007, SmartSwitch Botswana concluded a successful pilot to perform the required functions. On March 19, 2007, the first monthly loan deductions request was received from a micro financier by SmartSwitch Botswana. The monthly deduction file was tested for compliance with the rules by SmartSwitch Botswana and was transmitted to the MFDP on March 20, 2007. The monthly deduction file was used to run deductions against the Government of Botswana’s April pay file.

               Nigeria

          We consolidate SmartSwitch Nigeria Limited, or SmartSwitch Nigeria, for financial accounting purposes. This differs from the equity accounting treatment of our investments in SmartSwitch Namibia and SmartSwitch Botswana. SmartSwitch Nigeria requires UEPS hardware and software to the value of approximately $14 million from us. The revenue and profit arising from these transactions between us and SmartSwitch Nigeria have been eliminated upon consolidation and we have fully consolidated the start-up losses incurred during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 by SmartSwitch Nigeria. We estimate to incur total start-up losses of approximately $2.0 million during the implementation period.

          One of SmartSwitch Nigeria’s initial objectives is to have an impact on the financial industry in Nigeria, where approximately 90% of the population of 140 million people is un-banked and transacts in cash. SmartSwitch Nigeria’s other objectives will be to deploy the UEPS technology through several applications, including banking, health care, money transfers, pre-paid utilities and telephony and voting.

          Diamond Bank, one of Nigeria’s largest banking institutions, has ordered 50,000 smart cards from us for their initial deployment into the village community bank. SmartSwitch Nigeria, together with Diamond Bank, has applied for permission from the Central Bank of Nigeria to conduct a multi-lateral clearing and settlement system that will allow other financial institutions to participate in the switch.

          SmartSwitch Nigeria and selected partners have tendered to provide the Nigerian government with a multi-purpose smart card. The multi-purpose card tender comprises:

• a national identity authentication/ verification system,
• a government financial payments for services system, and
• an affordable banking solution.

          The Nigerian government is currently evaluating the tender submissions. Our consortium is one of the two remaining bidders and we expect the outcome of the tender to be finalized when the newly elected Nigerian government resumes with their duties.

          During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we completed the SmartSwitch Nigeria computer room which houses the UEPS backend processing hardware and software in Nigeria. In addition, the switch has been commissioned and the required Nigerian staff have been appointed and trained.

          We expect SmartSwitch Nigeria to become fully operative during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

29

               Colombia and Vietnam

          We are at various stages of implementation of our VTU solution in Colombia and Vietnam. We have concluded shareholder and loans agreements with partners in Colombia and Vietnam to set up VTU services. In Colombia, we own 50% of VTU De Colombia SA, or VTU Colombia, and have fully installed and integrated the VTU system and have commenced a limited and low profile pilot with the Colombia’s third largest mobile operator. In addition, agreements have been concluded with VTU Colombia’s initial and primary distribution partner to deploy VTU enabled handsets through its national distribution and salesforce. We expect “live” transactions in the city of Bogota to commence towards the end of May 2007 once a significant initial batch of VTU Subscriber Identity Module, or SIM, cards have been delivered and the network operator has agreed to a full public announcement and launch date. VTU Colombia has also commenced preliminary discussions with the Colombia’s largest mobile operator.

          In Vietnam, we own 30% of Vietnam Payment Technologies, or Vinapay, and we expect Vinapay to be authorized and licensed to commence activities by the end of May 2007. We expect systems installation and integration to the first mobile operator to be concluded by mid-June 2007. In addition, we have commenced preliminary discussions with two of Vietnam’s other mobile operators and the country's largest internet gaming operator.

               Other Countries

          We have also implemented UEPS systems in Ghana, Rwanda, Burundi, Malawi and Mozambique, some of which are considered among the poorest countries in the world. In Malawi, our system has been implemented by the Reserve Bank of Malawi as a national payment system.

          In addition, our relationship with MTN Group (Africa/Middle East’s largest mobile operator group) regarding VTU continues to progress. Both MTN Ivory Coast and MTN Rwanda have purchased VTU systems, bringing the number of MTN operators using VTU for electronic pre-paid airtime top-up to six.

Progress of wage payment implementation

          As discussed on our quarterly results conference call and in our quarterly filings on Form 10-Q and annual filings on Form 10-K, the implementation of our wage payment initiative in South Africa requires us to be registered as a bank in South Africa, or to have access to an existing deposit taking license. Our approach to obtaining our own license, or gain access to one was via one of the following channels:

• applying for a new banking license;
• purchasing an existing banking license; and
• entering into a joint venture arrangement with an existing banking institution to gain access to its banking license.

          In late January 2007, we signed a co-operation agreement with Grindrod Bank Limited, or Grindrod Bank, a fully registered bank in South Africa, for the establishment of a retail banking division within Grindrod Bank that will focus on deploying our wage payment solution in South Africa. Under the agreement, Grindrod Bank will establish the division and will be responsible for the human resources, administration, compliance, risk management and financial affairs of the division. Net1 will be responsible for the supply and maintenance of all UEPS hardware and software required to implement and run its wage payment system, for which it will charge a monthly fee per smart card account at Net1’s cost price, and will receive ongoing fee payments based on the amount of business transacted by the division utilizing the UEPS technology. Net1 will assist Grindrod Bank with the implementation of the business plan and operational activities and both parties will each initially contribute $0.7 million (ZAR 5 million) to assist with the set-up costs of the division. The division will report to an executive committee consisting of two Net1 and two Grindrod representatives.

          The target markets for the wage payment system are the un-banked and under-banked wage earners in South Africa, estimated at 5 million people. These wage earners are typically paid in cash on a weekly, bi-weekly or monthly basis and have all the risks associated with cash payments, but none of the benefits associated with having a formal bank account. Net1 and Grindrod Bank plan to offer these wage earners a UEPS smart card that will allow the card holder to receive payment, transact and access other financial services in a secure, cost-effective way.

          Net1 and Grindrod Bank commenced with the establishment of the division during the third quarter of fiscal 2007. During the establishment phase, all the relevant technological platforms will be installed, where required, or integrated between Net1 and Grindrod. Grindrod Bank, with Net1’s assistance, has also initiated the process that will enable it to become a member of the South African National Payment System and the various payment clearing houses in South Africa. In parallel, Net1 and Grindrod Bank have defined the products, pricing and marketing strategy for the wage payment system. We anticipate that the Grindrod Bank retail division will commence with the marketing of the wage payment solution during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.

30

Proposed abolishment of Secondary Taxation on Companies

          On February 21, 2007, the South African Minister of Finance announced in his National Budget speech that the National Government intends to phase out Secondary Taxation on Companies, or STC, and introduce a dividend tax at a shareholder level. Currently South African companies are required to pay STC at a rate of 12.5% on dividends distributed, subject to certain exemptions. If a dividend tax is introduced South African companies will no longer be liable to pay STC, the shareholder will be liable to pay the dividend tax. Treaty relief would be available for foreign shareholders.

          The reform will be implemented in two phases, the first entailing a reduction of the STC rate, effective October 1, 2007, to 10% and the second, in 2008, a total conversion to a dividend tax. It is likely that South Africa companies will be required to withhold the dividend tax on all dividend paid.

          We can not reasonably determine whether these proposals will be enacted as proposed and we will comply with the new tax legislation once it has been enacted. We expect the proposed replacement of STC with a dividend tax to reduce our current fully distributed rate of 36.89% to 29%. In addition, in terms of GAAP we apply the fully distributed rate of 36.89% to our deferred taxation assets and liabilities. The change in the fully distributed rate is expected to reduce our deferred taxation assets and liabilities. We have not yet determined whether we would qualify for the treaty relief available to foreign shareholders.

          Included in our earnings for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 is deferred income tax expense of approximately $2.3 million and $6.2 million (ZAR 16.7 million and ZAR 44.1. million), respectively, related to the application of the fully distributed rate of 36.89% compared with the South African statutory rate of 29% to our Income before income tax. If the proposed amendments were enacted as of July 1, 2006, and a dividend tax at shareholder level were to be introduced, the following table illustrates the impact of the adjustments on our financial statements:

          (1) – the net deferred tax liability reversal to net income represents the net deferred tax liability rate adjustment as of June 30, 2006 translated at rates applicable as of June 30, 2006.

          As discussed above, we can not reasonably determine whether, or when, these amendments will be enacted as proposed and what the ultimate effect on our reported earnings will be.

Critical Accounting Policies

          Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, the determination of estimates requires management’s judgment based on a variety of assumptions and other determinants such as historical experience, current and expected market conditions and certain scientific evaluation techniques.

          Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant judgments or uncertainties, and potentially may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Management has identified the following critical accounting policies that are described in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006.

• Deferred taxation;
• Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful debts; and
• Research and development.

Recent accounting pronouncements adopted

          Refer to Note 1 of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and effects on financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

31

          Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of March 31, 2007

Refer to Note 1 of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of March 31, 2007, including the expected dates of adoption and effects on financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Currency Exchange Rate Information

          Actual exchange rates

          The actual exchange rates for and at the end of the periods presented were as follows:

          We are required to translate our results of operations from ZAR to U.S. dollars on a monthly basis. Thus, the average rates used to translate this data for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, vary slightly from the averages shown in the table above. The translation rates we use in presenting our results of operations are the rates shown in the following table:

32

Results of operations

          The discussion of our consolidated overall results of operations is based on amounts as reflected in “Item 1 – Financial Statements” which are reported in U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Our discussion analyzes our results of operations both in U.S. dollars and ZAR, because ZAR is the functional currency of the entities which contribute the majority of our profits and is the currency in which the majority of our transactions are initially incurred and measured. Due to the significant impact of currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and ZAR on our reported results and because we use the U.S. dollar as our reporting currency, we believe that the supplemental presentation of our results of operations in ZAR is useful to investors to understand the changes in the underlying trends of our business.

          We analyze our business and operations in terms of four inter-related but independent operating segments: (1) transaction-based activities, (2) smart card accounts, (3) financial services, and (4) hardware, software and related technology sales. In addition, corporate and corporate office activities that are impracticable to ascribe directly to any of the other operating segments, as well as any inter-segment eliminations, are included in corporate/eliminations.

          Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006

          The following factors had a significant influence on our results of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared with the same period in the prior year:

• significant weakening of the South African rand, our functional currency, against the U.S. dollar, our reporting currency, which had a negative impact on our revenues and net income in U.S. dollars;
• receipt of a settlement payment from SASSA related to contract deviations and price increases;
• impact of the Prism acquisition, which has increased our reporting revenues and net income but has a negative impact on our operating margin;
• amortization of Prism and EasyPay-related intangible assets, which had a negative impact on our net income;
• continued decrease in margins in our traditional micro-lending operations; and
• increased revenues from continued adoption of our merchant acquiring system by cardholders.

          Consolidated overall results of operations

          This discussion is based on the amounts which were prepared in accordance with US GAAP.

          The following tables show the changes in the items comprising our statements of operations, both in U.S. dollars and in ZAR: