Lightstone Value Plus REIT V, Inc. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

Commission File Number: 000-53650

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(888) 808-7348

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes ¨    No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨    No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x    No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨    No x

There is no established market for the Registrant’s common stock. The Registrant has adopted a Policy for Estimation of Common Stock Value (the “Estimated Valuation Policy”) pursuant to which it has estimated the net asset value per share of its common stock (“NAV per Share”).  As of September 30, 2017, the estimated NAV per Share was $7.98. For a full description of the methodologies used to estimate the NAV per Share of the Registrant’s common stock, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities-Market Information” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There were 24,996,586 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2017, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. As of March 16, 2018, the registrant had 24.6 million shares of common stock outstanding.

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST V, INC.

(FORMERLY BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.)

FORM 10-K

Year Ended December 31, 2017

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These forward-looking statements include discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. (formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.) and our subsidiaries (which may be referred to herein as the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), including our ability to make accretive real estate or real estate-related investments, rent space on favorable terms, to address our debt maturities and to fund our liquidity requirements, to sell our assets when we believe advantageous to achieve our investment objectives, our anticipated capital expenditures, the amount and timing of anticipated future cash distributions to our stockholders, the estimated net asset value per share of our common stock (“NAV per Share”), and other matters.  Words such as “may,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but reflect the intent, belief or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry, the economy and other future conditions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we caution stockholders not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the factors described below:

Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Report, and may ultimately prove to be incorrect. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results, except as required by applicable law. We intend for these forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions created by Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.

Cautionary Note

The representations, warranties, and covenants made by us in any agreement filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made solely for the benefit of the parties to the agreement, including, in some cases, for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties to the agreement, and should not be deemed to be representations, warranties, or covenants to or with any other parties. Moreover, these representations, warranties, or covenants should not be relied upon as accurately describing or reflecting the current state of our affairs.

PART I

Item 1.    Business.

Organization

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., which changed its name to Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. effective July 20, 2017, (which may be referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was organized as a Maryland corporation on January 9, 2007 and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

We were formed primarily to acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets on an opportunistic and value-add basis.  In particular, we have and expect to continue to focus generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment, or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who are distressed or face time-sensitive deadlines. We have and expect to continue to acquire a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, and multifamily. We have and expect to continue to purchase existing, income-producing properties, and newly-constructed properties. Additionally, we have and may continue to invest in other real estate related investments, such as mortgage and mezzanine loans. We currently intend to hold our various real properties until such time as our board of directors determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that the objectives will not be met. From our inception through December 31, 2017, we have made an aggregate of 22 investments, including the origination of a mezzanine and a mortgage loan. With respect to these 22 investments, we have cumulatively disposed of 15 investments through December 31, 2017, including the repayment of the mortgage and mezzanine loans that we originated. Additionally, during 2013 we sold eight of the nine medical office buildings which comprised our Florida MOB Portfolio investment. We will not count the sale of these eight medical office buildings as the disposition of an investment until we sell the remaining medical office building, the Gardens Medical Pavilion, which was part of the Florida MOB Portfolio.

Substantially all of our business is conducted through Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II LP, a limited partnership organized in Delaware (the “Operating Partnership”). As of December 31, 2017, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, owned a 0.1% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. As of December 31, 2017, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO Business Trust II, a Maryland business trust, was the sole limited partner of the Operating Partnership and owned the remaining 99.9% interest in the Operating Partnership.

Subject to the oversight of our board of directors, our business has been managed by an external advisor since the commencement of our initial public offering and we have no employees. From January 4, 2008 through February 10, 2017, an affiliate of Stratera Services, LLC, formerly known as “Behringer Harvard Holdings, LLC” (“Behringer”), acted as our external advisor (the “Behringer Advisor”). On February 10, 2017, we terminated our engagement of Behringer Advisor and engaged affiliates of The Lightstone Group, LLC (“Lightstone”), LSG-BH II Advisor LLC and LSG Development Advisor LLC (collectively, the “Advisor”), to provide advisory services to us. Our external advisor is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for services related to our acquisition, financing and disposition activities.

Our office is located at 1985 Cedar Bridge Avenue, Suite 1, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701 and our toll-free telephone number is (888) 808-7348.

Public Offerings of Common Stock

We commenced an initial public offering of our common stock on January 21, 2008 (the "Initial Offering"), including shares offered pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRP”). On July 3, 2011, the Initial Offering terminated in accordance with its terms. On July 5, 2011, we commenced a follow-on public offering of our common stock (the "Follow-On Offering"), including shares offered pursuant to our DRP. We terminated the primary component of the Follow-On Offering effective March 15, 2012 and the DRP component effective April 3, 2012. We raised gross offering proceeds of approximately $265.3 million from the sale of approximately 26.7 million shares under the Offerings, including shares sold under the DRP.

In connection with our initial capitalization, we issued 22,471 shares of our common stock and 1,000 shares of our convertible stock to Behringer on January 19, 2007. Behringer transferred its shares of convertible stock to one of its affiliates on April 2, 2010.

As of April 2012, when we terminated the offering, we had issued 26.7 million shares of our common stock, including 22,471 shares owned by Behringer and 2.2 million shares issued through the DRP. As of December 31, 2017, we had redeemed 2.1 million shares of our common stock and had 24.6 million shares of common stock outstanding. As of December 31, 2017, we had 1,000 shares of convertible stock outstanding held by an affiliate of Lightstone, which shares were transferred from Behringer on February 10, 2017. Our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange.  The timing of a liquidity event for our stockholders will depend upon then prevailing market conditions. We previously targeted the commencement of a liquidity event within six years after the termination of our initial public offering, which occurred on July 3, 2011. On June 29, 2017, our board of directors elected to extend the targeted timeline an additional six years until June 30, 2023 based on their assessment of our investment objectives and liquidity options for our stockholders. However, we can provide no assurances as to the actual timing of the commencement of a liquidity event for our stockholders or the ultimate liquidation of the Company. We will seek stockholder approval prior to liquidating our entire portfolio.

2017 Highlights

During 2017, we completed the following key transactions:

For further information regarding our consolidated real estate properties, see Item 2.

Investment Objectives

Our primary investment objectives are:

Investment Policies

We have and expect to continue to invest in commercial properties, such as office, industrial, retail, hospitality, multifamily, existing income-producing properties, and newly-constructed properties that are initially identified as opportunistic and value-add investments with significant possibilities for capital appreciation due to their property-specific characteristics or their market characteristics.

We have disposed of 15 of our original portfolio assets through December 31, 2017, including the repayment of the mortgage and mezzanine loans that we previously originated.

We have and expect to continue to generally make our real estate investments in fee title or a long-term leasehold estate through the Operating Partnership or indirectly through special purpose limited liability companies or through investments in joint ventures, partnerships, co-tenancies, or other co-ownership arrangements with the developers of the properties or other persons.

Borrowing Policies

There is no limitation on the amount we may invest in or borrow related to any single property or other investment. Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness cannot exceed 300% of our “net assets” (as defined by the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts adopted by the North American Securities Administrators Association on May 7, 2007) as of the date of any borrowing; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors. In addition to our charter limitation, our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests. Our board of directors must review our aggregate borrowings at least quarterly. As of December 31, 2017, we had an aggregate debt leverage ratio of approximately 38.1% of the aggregate value of our assets.

Disposition Policies

As each of our investments reaches what we believe to be the asset’s optimum value during the expected life of the program, we will consider disposing of the investment and may do so for the purpose of reinvesting the net sales proceeds into real estate and real estate-related investments, distributing the net sale proceeds to our stockholders or satisfying our obligations. A property may be sold before or after the expected holding period if, in the judgment of our Advisor and our independent board, the sale of the property is determined to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Distribution Policy

U.S. federal tax law requires a REIT to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. In order to continue to qualify for REIT status, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on their analysis of our performance over the previous periods and expectations of performance for future periods. Such analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions, proceeds from asset sales and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. Our board of directors’ decisions will be substantially influenced by their obligation to ensure that we maintain our federal tax status as a REIT. We cannot provide assurance that we will pay distributions at any particular level, or at all.

Prior to 2012, our board of directors declared distributions on a quarterly basis based on daily record dates, portions of which were paid on a monthly basis. During the first quarter of 2012, our board of directors determined to cease regular, monthly distributions in favor of payment of periodic special distributions.

Since 2012, our board of directors has declared a total of $77.1 million, or $3.00 per share of common stock, in special cash distributions, all of which were paid to stockholders during 2014, 2015, and 2016. These special cash distributions were paid with a portion of proceeds from asset sales. We did not make any special cash distributions during 2017.

Competition

We are subject to significant competition in seeking tenants for the leasing of our properties and buyers for the potential sale of our properties. The competition for creditworthy tenants is intense, and we have been required to provide rent concessions, incur charges for tenant improvements, and provide other inducements in order to lease vacant space at our properties.  Without these inducements, we may not be able to continue to lease vacant space timely, or at all, which would adversely impact our results of operations.  We also compete with sellers of similar properties when we sell properties, which may result in our receiving lower proceeds from the sale of our properties or not being able to sell our properties at prices that will achieve our original return objectives. We compete for buyers and tenants with many third parties engaged in real estate investment activities, including other REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, lenders, hedge funds, governmental bodies, and other entities. Many of our competitors, including larger REITs, have greater financial resources than we have and generally may be able to accept more risk. They also may enjoy competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies.

Regulations

Our investments are subject to various federal, state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, including, among other things, zoning regulations, land use controls, environmental controls relating to air and water quality, noise pollution, and indirect environmental impacts such as increased motor vehicle activity. We believe that we have all permits and approvals necessary under current law to operate our investments.

Environmental

As an owner of real estate, we are subject to various environmental laws of federal, state, and local governments. Compliance with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, and management does not believe it will have such an impact in the future. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on properties in which we hold an interest.

Employees

We have no employees. Our Advisor and its affiliates perform a full range of real estate services for us, including asset management, accounting, legal, property management, and investor relations services.

We are dependent on the Advisor and its affiliates for services that are essential to us, including asset management and acquisition, disposition and financing activities, and other general administrative responsibilities. If these companies were unable to provide these services to us, we would be required to provide the services ourselves or obtain the services from other sources.

Financial Information About Industry Segments

Our current business consists of owning, managing, operating, leasing, developing, investing in, and disposing of real estate and real estate-related investments. We internally evaluate all of our real estate investments as one reportable segment, and, accordingly, we do not report segment information.

Available Information

We electronically file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports with the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also have filed with the SEC registration statements in connection with the Offerings. Copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from our website at www.lightstonecapitalmarkets.com or at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Access to these filings is free of charge. We are not incorporating our website or any information from the website into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The factors described below represent the principal risks of an investment in our shares and that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements. Other factors may exist that we do not consider significant based on information that is currently available or that we are not currently able to anticipate. Our stockholders may be referred to as “you” or “your” in this Item 1A. “Risk Factors” section.

Risks Related to an Investment in Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. (formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

There currently is no public trading market for our shares; therefore, it may be difficult for you to sell your shares. If you are able to sell your shares, you may have to sell them at a substantial discount from our estimated net asset value per common share (“NAV per Share”).

There currently is no public market for our shares and our charter does not require our board of directors to provide liquidity to our stockholders by a specified date, or at all. In addition, if you are able to sell your shares, the price you receive for the sale of any shares of our common stock is likely to be less than the estimated NAV per Share.

Therefore, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. You may not be able to sell your shares in the event of an emergency, and, if you are able to sell your shares, you may have to sell them at a substantial discount from the estimated NAV per Share. It is also likely that your shares would not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan.

We may not successfully implement an exit strategy, in which case you may have to hold your investment for an indefinite period.

Our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange.  The timing of a liquidity event for our stockholders will depend upon then prevailing market conditions. We previously targeted the commencement of a liquidity event within six years after the termination of our initial public offering, which occurred on July 3, 2011. On June 29, 2017, our board of directors elected to extend the targeted timeline an additional six years until June 30, 2023 based on their assessment of our investment objectives and liquidity options for our stockholders.

As a result, if we do not begin the process of liquidating (or listing our shares on a national securities exchange) by June 2023, our charter requires that we hold a stockholders meeting to vote on a proposal for our orderly liquidation unless a majority of our board of directors and a majority of our independent directors vote to defer the meeting.

Market conditions and other factors could cause our board of directors and our independent directors to conclude that it is not in our best interests to hold a stockholders meeting for the purpose of voting on a proposal for our orderly liquidation in 2023. Our charter permits our board of directors, with the concurrence of a majority of our independent directors, to defer such a stockholder vote indefinitely. Therefore, if we are not successful in implementing an exit strategy, your shares will continue to be illiquid and you may, for an indefinite period of time, be unable to convert your investment into cash easily with minimum loss.

The estimated NAV per Share of our common stock may not reflect the actual value that stockholders may ultimately receive for their investment.

On December 4, 2017, pursuant to the Policy for Estimation of Common Stock Value (the “Estimated Valuation Policy”), our board of directors determined and approved our estimated NAV of approximately $198.7 million and resulting estimated NAV per Share of $7.98, based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2017, as described under “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities-Market Information” included in Part II, Item 5.

The estimated NAV per Share was based upon consultation with our external advisor and an independent, third-party valuation advisory firm engaged by us, using what the board of directors deemed to be appropriate valuation methodologies and assumptions under current circumstances in accordance with the Estimated Valuation Policy.

As with any valuation methodology, the methodology used to determine our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may prove later not to be accurate or complete.  Further, different participants with different property-specific and general real estate and capital market assumptions, estimates, judgments and standards could derive a different estimated NAV per Share, which could be significantly different from the estimated NAV per Share approved by our board of directors.  The estimated NAV per Share approved by our board of directors does not represent the fair value of our assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and such estimated NAV per Share is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that:

The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor do not provide any guidance on the methodology an issuer must use to determine its estimated NAV per share. FINRA guidance provides that NAV valuations be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice.

Our estimated NAV per Share is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities and other non-controlling interests divided by the number of our diluted shares of common stock outstanding, all as of the date indicated. Our estimated NAV per Share does not reflect a discount for the fact we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. Our estimated NAV per Share does not take into account estimated disposition costs or fees or penalties, if any, that may apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations or the impact of restrictions on the assumption of certain debt. Our estimated NAV per Share will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, future acquisitions or dispositions of assets, developments related to individual assets and the management of those assets and changes in the real estate and capital markets. Markets for real estate and real estate-related investments can fluctuate and values are expected to change in the future. Our Estimated Valuation Policy requires us to update our estimated NAV per Share value on at least an annual basis. Our board of directors will review and approve each estimate of NAV and resulting estimated NAV per Share.

The following factors may cause a stockholder not to ultimately realize distributions per share of common stock equal to the estimated NAV per Share upon liquidation:

For a full description of the methodologies used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the NAV per Share, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Market Information.”

Because we rely on affiliates of Lightstone for advisory and property management services, if Lightstone, or its majority owner, is unable to meet its obligations, we may be required to find alternative providers for these services, which could result in a significant and costly disruption of our business.

David Lichtenstein, the chairman of our board of directors, is the majority owner of Lightstone, and directly or indirectly owns the Advisor and our property manager. The operations of the Advisor and our property manager rely substantially on Mr. Lichtenstein and on Lightstone. Lightstone and its majority owner are dependent on fee income from their other sponsored real estate programs. Any real estate market disruptions could adversely affect the amount of such fee income. If Lightstone or its majority owner become unable to meet their obligations as they become due, we might be required to find alternative service providers, which could result in a significant disruption of our business and would likely adversely affect the value of your investment in us.

If we lose or are unable to retain key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain executive officers and other key personnel, of us, the Advisor and its affiliates, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We do not directly employ our executive officers and other key personnel, and we cannot guarantee that they will remain affiliated with us. Also, our executive officers and key personnel do not all have employment agreements with the Advisor, and we cannot guarantee that such persons will remain affiliated with the Advisor. We do not separately maintain key person life insurance on any of our key personnel.

Further, we believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon the Advisor’s and its affiliates’ ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial and operational personnel. Competition for persons with these skills is intense, and we cannot assure you that the Advisor will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel.

We are restricted in our ability to replace our property manager, an affiliate of the Advisor.

Under the terms of our property management agreement, we may terminate the agreement upon 30 days’ notice in the event of, and only in the event of, a showing of willful misconduct, gross negligence, or deliberate malfeasance by the property manager in performing its duties. Our board of directors may find the performance of our property manager to be unsatisfactory. However, unsatisfactory performance by the property manager may not constitute “willful misconduct, gross negligence, or deliberate malfeasance.” As a result, we may be unable to terminate the property management agreement, which may have an adverse effect on the management and profitability of our properties.

Payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses to the Advisor and its affiliates will reduce cash available for investment and may adversely affect the return on your investment.

The Advisor and its affiliates will perform services for us in connection with the management and leasing of our properties, the administration of our other investments and the acquisition, disposition and financing of our assets. They will be paid substantial fees for these services. In addition, we reimburse our Advisor a fee for expenses it incurs with respect to administrative services pursuant to the terms of the advisory agreement. These fees and expense reimbursements will reduce the amount of cash available for investment and may adversely affect the return on your investment.

Our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares under our share redemption program and, if our stockholders are able to sell their shares under the program, they may not be able to recover the amount of their investment in our shares.

Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption program that permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us, subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the program. Our board of directors can amend the provisions of our share redemption program without the approval of our stockholders. The terms on which we redeem shares may differ between Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions. From April 1, 2012 to May 15, 2014 our board of directors suspended accepting Ordinary Redemptions. Although our board of directors has resumed considering Ordinary Redemption requests, the cash available for redemptions (Ordinary and Exceptional) is limited to no more than $10.0 million in any twelve-month period. Our board of directors may determine to suspend accepting redemptions at any time, and we can provide no assurances that the $10.0 million of funds available for redemptions will be sufficient to honor all redemption requests submitted.

Any shares approved for redemption will be redeemed on a periodic basis as determined from time to time by our board of directors, and no less frequently than annually. We will not redeem, during any twelve-month period, more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. Further, we have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency. The redemption limitations apply to all redemptions, whether Ordinary or Exceptional Redemptions. These limits may prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any year or for a specific redemption date.

Under our share redemption program, the purchase price per share for the redeemed shares submitted as an Ordinary Redemption and an Exceptional Redemption will equal the lesser of 80% and 90%, respectively, of:

On December 4, 2017, our board of directors approved an estimated NAV per Share of $7.98 as of September 30, 2017. For a full description of the methodologies and assumptions used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the estimated NAV per Share, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Market Information.” The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to individual assets in our portfolio and the management of those assets and in response to the real estate and finance markets. As such, the estimated NAV per Share does not take into account developments in our portfolio since December 4, 2017.

We currently expect to engage our Advisor and/or an independent valuation firm to update our estimated NAV per Share annually. Upon updating our estimated NAV per Share, the redemption price per share will also change. Because of the restrictions of our share redemption program, our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares under the program, and if stockholders are able to sell their shares, depending upon the then current redemption price, they may not recover the amount of their investment in us.

Risks Related to Our Business

We are uncertain of our sources for funding of future capital needs, which could adversely affect the value of our investments.

Our ability to fund future property capital needs, such as tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and capital expenditures, will depend on our ability to borrow, to sell assets or interests in assets, and to generate additional cash flows from operations. We will establish capital reserves on a property-by-property basis, as we deem appropriate. In addition to any reserves we establish, a lender may require escrow of capital reserves in excess of our established reserves. If these reserves are insufficient to meet our cash needs, we may have to obtain financing from either affiliated or unaffiliated sources to fund our cash requirements. Accordingly, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future for the improvement of our properties or for any other reason, we have not identified any sources for such funding, and we cannot assure you that such sources of funding will be available to us for potential capital needs.

Market disruptions may adversely impact aspects of our operating results and operating condition.

Our business may be affected by adverse market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. and global economies or the real estate industry as a whole or by the local economic conditions in the markets which our properties are located. These conditions may materially affect the value and performance of our properties, and may affect our ability to pay cash distributions, the availability or the terms of financing that we have or may anticipate utilizing, and our ability to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance, any outstanding debt when due. These challenging economic conditions may also impact the ability of certain of our tenants to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy rental payments under existing leases. Specifically, global market disruptions may have many consequences including, but not limited to, these listed below:

Disruptions in the financial markets and adverse economic conditions in the geographic regions where our properties are located could adversely affect the value of our investments.

Market volatility will likely make the valuation of our investment properties more difficult. There may be significant uncertainty in the valuation, or in the stability of the value, of our properties that could result in a substantial decrease in the value of our properties. As a result, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, and we may be required to recognize impairment charges, which will reduce our reported earnings.

If our Advisor were to waive or defer certain fees due to them, our results of operations may be artificially high.

Our Advisor may agree to waive or defer all or a portion of the acquisition, asset management or other fees, compensation or incentives due to them, pay general administrative expenses, or otherwise supplement stockholder returns in order to increase the amount of cash available to support our operations. As a result, our earnings may be artificially higher than normal and could be misleading in years when our Advisor waives or defers such fees and incentives.

Your interest in us will be diluted if we or the Operating Partnership issues additional securities.

Stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. Our charter currently has authorized 400,001,000 shares of capital stock, of which 350,000,000 shares are designated as common stock, 1,000 shares are designated as convertible stock and 50,000,000 are designated as preferred stock. Subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our board of directors may amend our charter to increase the number of authorized shares of capital stock, increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series of stock designated, and may classify or reclassify any unissued shares without the necessity of obtaining stockholder approval. Shares will be issued in the discretion of our board of directors. Stockholders will likely experience dilution of their equity investment in us in the event that we: (i) sell shares of our common stock in the future; (ii) sell securities that are convertible into shares of our common stock; (iii) issue shares of our common stock in a private offering of securities to institutional investors; (iv) issue shares of common stock upon the conversion of our convertible stock; (v) issue shares of common stock upon the exercise of any options granted to our independent directors or employees of our advisor or property manager and an affiliate of our advisor or property manager or their affiliates; (vi) issue shares to our advisor, its successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding fee obligation as set forth under our advisory management agreement; or (vii) issue shares of our common stock to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. In addition, the partnership agreement for the Operating Partnership contains provisions that allow, under certain circumstances, other entities to merge into or cause the exchange or conversion of their interest for interests of the Operating Partnership. Because the limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership may be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between the Operating Partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders.

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with the Advisor and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below.

The Advisor and its affiliates, including our affiliated director and any executive officer who is also an employee of the Advisor or its affiliates, will face conflicts of interest caused by their compensation arrangements with us, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.

Our Advisor and its affiliates and our property manager, are entitled to substantial fees from us under the terms of the advisory management agreement and property management agreement. These fees could influence our Advisor’s advice to us, as well as the judgment of affiliates of our Advisor performing services for us. Among other matters, these compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

The fees the external advisor have or will receive in connection with transactions involving the purchase and management of an asset are based on the value of the investment, and not based on the quality of the investment or the quality of the services rendered to us. This may have or may influence the Advisor to recommend riskier transactions to us.

Our affiliated director and our officers face conflicts of interest related to the positions they hold with Lightstone and with entities affiliated with Lightstone, which could diminish the value of the services they provide to us.

Our affiliated director and certain of our executive officers are also officers of Lightstone and other entities affiliated with Lightstone, including the advisors and fiduciaries to other Lightstone-sponsored programs. As a result, these individuals owe duties to these other entities and their investors, which may conflict with the duties that they owe to us and our stockholders. Their loyalties to these other entities and investors could result in action or inaction that is detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our business strategy and our investment and leasing opportunities. Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to (i) allocation of management time and services between us and the other entities, and (ii) the timing and terms of the sale of an asset. If we do not successfully implement our business strategy, we may be unable to maintain or increase the value of our assets and the overall return on your investment may be reduced.

The key personnel that conduct our day-to-day operations will face competing demands on their time, and this may cause our investment returns to suffer.

We rely upon our executive officers and the employees of our Advisor and its affiliates to conduct our day-to-day operations. These persons also conduct the day-to-day operations of other Lightstone-sponsored programs and may have other business interests as well. Because these persons have competing interests on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and resources to our business than is necessary or appropriate. If this occurs, the returns on our investments may suffer.

General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate

Our opportunistic and value-add property-acquisition strategy involved a higher risk of loss than more conservative investment strategies.

Our strategy for acquiring properties has and may continue to involve the acquisition of properties in markets that are depressed or overbuilt, and/or have high growth potential in real estate lease rates and sale prices. As a result of our investment in these types of markets, we may face increased risks relating to changes in local market conditions and increased competition for similar properties in the same market, as well as increased risks that these markets will not recover and the value of our properties in these markets will not increase, or will decrease, over time. For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our real estate properties, and as a result, your overall investment return may be adversely affected. Our approach to acquiring and operating income-producing properties involves more risk than comparable real estate programs that may have a targeted holding period for investments that is longer than ours, utilize leverage to a lesser degree and/or employ more conservative investment strategies.

Our revenue and net income may vary significantly from one period to another due to opportunity oriented investments, which could increase the variability of our cash available to support our operations.

Our opportunistic and value-add property investment strategy has and may continue to include investments in properties in various phases of development, redevelopment or repositioning, which may cause our revenues and net income to fluctuate significantly from one period to another. Projects do not produce revenue while in development or redevelopment. During any period when our projects in development or redevelopment or those with significant capital requirements increase without a corresponding increase in stable revenue-producing properties, our revenues and net income will likely decrease. Many factors may have a negative impact on the level of revenues or net income produced by our portfolio of properties and projects, including higher than expected construction costs, failure to complete projects on a timely basis, failure of the properties to perform at expected levels upon completion of development or redevelopment, and increased borrowings necessary to fund higher than expected construction or other costs related to the project. Further, our net income and shareholders’ equity could be negatively affected during periods with large portfolio investments, which generally require large cash outlays and may require the incurrence of additional financing. Any such reduction in our revenues and net income during such periods could cause a resulting decrease in our cash available to support our operations during the same periods.

Our operating results are affected by economic and regulatory changes that have an adverse impact on the real estate market in general, and we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will be able to sustain or enhance the value of our real estate properties.

Our operating results are subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:

For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will be able to sustain or enhance the value of our real estate properties.

If our investment portfolio lacks diversification, downturns relating to certain geographic regions, types of assets, industries or business sectors may have a more significant adverse impact on our assets and your overall investment return than if we had a diversified investment portfolio.

We are not required to observe specific diversification criteria. Therefore, our investments in target assets may be concentrated in certain asset types that are subject to higher risk of foreclosure, or secured by assets concentrated in a limited number of geographic locations or industries. To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic regions, types of assets, industries or business sectors, downturns relating generally to such region, type of asset, industry or business sector may leave our profitability vulnerable to a downturn in such areas as a result of tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a number of our properties within a short time period, which may reduce our earnings and our NAV per Share and accordingly reduce our stockholders’ overall return.

Properties that have significant vacancies could be difficult to sell, which could diminish the return on your investment.

A property may incur vacancies either by the continued default of tenants under their leases or the expiration of tenant leases. If vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues. In addition, the value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

Many of our investments are or may be dependent on tenants for revenue; lease expirations and terminations could adversely affect our operations and your overall investment return.

The success of our real property investments often are or will be materially dependent on the occupancy rates of our properties and the financial stability of our tenants. If we are unable to renew or extend significant expiring leases at our medical office building under similar terms or are unable to negotiate new leases, or if our tenants default on lease payments, it could negatively impact our liquidity and consequently adversely affect our ability to fund our ongoing operations. A default by a significant tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue associated with such lease and cause us to have to find an alternative source of revenue to meet mortgage payments and prevent a foreclosure. In the event of a tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. If significant leases are terminated, we cannot assure you that we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. Additionally, any loans that we make generally will relate to real estate. As a result, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be dependent on the financial stability of the tenants leasing the related real estate.

We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so, which could adversely impact our cash flow and results of operations.

We currently intend to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as we determine that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that such objectives will not be met. We have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time, except upon our liquidation. If we do not begin the process of liquidating our assets or listing our shares by June 2023, our charter requires that we hold a stockholders meeting to vote on a proposal for our orderly liquidation unless a majority of our board of directors and a majority of our independent directors vote to defer such a meeting beyond June 2023. Market conditions and other factors could cause our board of directors and our independent directors to conclude that it is not in our best interests to hold a stockholders meeting for the purpose of voting on a proposal for our orderly liquidation in 2023. Therefore, if we are not successful in implementing an exit strategy, your shares will continue to be illiquid and you may, for an indefinite period of time, be unable to convert your investment into cash easily with minimum loss.

The real estate market is affected, as discussed above, by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any asset for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of an asset. If we are unable to sell an asset when we determine to do so, it could have a significant adverse effect on our cash flow and results of operations.

Our co-venture partners, co-tenants or other partners in co-ownership arrangements could take actions that decrease the value of an investment to us and lower your overall return.

We have or may enter into joint ventures with third parties for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties.

Such investments have or may involve risks not otherwise present with other forms of real estate investment, including, for example:

Any of the above might subject a property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce our returns on that investment.

Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage may adversely affect your returns.

Our Advisor attempts to ensure that all of our properties are adequately insured to cover casualty losses. The nature of the activities at certain properties we have invested in, such as student housing, will expose us and our operators to potential liability for personal injuries and property damage claims. In addition, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, pollution, environmental matters or extreme weather conditions such as hurricanes, floods and snowstorms that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorist acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Mortgage lenders generally insist that specific coverage against terrorism be purchased by commercial property owners as a condition for providing mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans. It is uncertain whether such insurance policies will be available, or available at reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We cannot assure you that we will have adequate coverage for such losses. In the event that any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by the amount of any such uninsured loss. In addition, other than the capital reserve or other reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property, and we cannot assure you that any such sources of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that may adversely affect the overall return on your investment.

Our operating results may be negatively affected by potential development and construction delays and result in increased costs and risks, which could diminish the return on your investment.

We have or may invest in the acquisition, development and/or redevelopment of properties upon which we, or a borrower, will develop and construct improvements. We could incur substantial capital obligations in connection with these types of investments. We may be subject to risks relating to uncertainties associated with rezoning for development and environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups and our builder’s ability to control construction costs or to build in conformity with plans, specifications and timetables. The builder’s failure to perform may necessitate legal action by us to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. Performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Delays in completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to such builders prior to completion of construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we may be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. Furthermore, we must rely upon projections of rental income and expenses and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price to be paid for the property at the time of acquisition of the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and the return on our investment could suffer.

If we set aside insufficient capital reserves, we may be required to defer necessary capital improvements.

If we do not have enough capital reserves to supply needed funds for capital improvements throughout the life of the investment in a property, and there is insufficient cash available from our operations, we may be required to defer necessary improvements to the property, which may cause the property to suffer from a greater risk of obsolescence or a decline in value, or a greater risk of decreased cash flow as a result of fewer potential tenants being attracted to the property. If this happens we may not be able to maintain projected rental rates for affected properties, and our results of operations may be negatively impacted.

Our student-housing properties are subject to an annual leasing cycle, short lease-up period, seasonal cash flows, changing university admission and housing policies, and other risks inherent in the student-housing industry, any of which could have a negative impact on your investment.

Student-housing properties generally have short-term leases of 12 months, ten months, nine months, or shorter. As a result, we may experience significantly reduced cash flows during the summer months from student-housing properties while most students are on vacation. Furthermore, student-housing properties must be almost entirely re-leased each year, exposing us to increased leasing risk. Student-housing properties are also typically leased during a limited leasing season that usually begins in August and ends in June of the following year. We would, therefore, be highly dependent on the effectiveness of our marketing and leasing efforts and personnel during this season.

Changes in university admission policies could also adversely affect us. For example, if a university reduces the number of student admissions or requires that a certain class of students, such as freshman, live in a university-owned facility, the demand for units at our student-housing properties may be reduced and our occupancy rates may decline. We rely on our relationships with colleges and universities for referrals of prospective student residents or for mailing lists of prospective student residents and their parents. Many of these colleges and universities own and operate their own competing on-campus facilities. Any failure to maintain good relationships with these colleges and universities could therefore have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our properties to students and their families.

Federal and state laws require colleges to publish and distribute reports of on-campus crime statistics, which may result in negative publicity and media coverage associated with crimes occurring on or in the vicinity of any student-housing properties. Reports of crime or other negative publicity regarding the safety of the students residing on, or near, our student-housing properties may have an adverse effect on our business.

We may face significant competition from university-owned student housing and from other residential properties that are in close proximity to student-housing properties we own, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

On-campus student housing has certain inherent advantages over off-campus student housing in terms of physical proximity to the university campus and integration of on-campus facilities into the academic community. Colleges and universities can generally avoid real estate taxes and borrow funds at lower interest rates than us.

We have and may continue to invest in apartment communities with short-term apartment leases, which may expose us to the effects of declining market rent more quickly and could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. Because these leases generally permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty, our rental revenues may be impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.

We face competition from other apartment communities and the increased affordability of single-family homes, which may limit our profitability and returns to our stockholders.

The apartment communities we have and may acquire most likely compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including other apartment communities, as well as single family homes and condominiums available to rent or purchase.

The residential apartment community industry is highly competitive. This competition could reduce occupancy levels and revenues at our apartment communities, which would adversely affect our operations. We expect to face competition from many sources, including from other apartment communities both in the immediate vicinity and the broader geographic market where our apartment communities are located. Overbuilding of apartment communities may occur. If so, this will increase the number of apartment units available and may decrease occupancy and apartment rental rates. In addition, increases in operating costs due to inflation may not be offset by increased apartment rental rates. We may be required to expend substantial sums to attract new residents.

We face increased competition from single-family homes and condominiums for rent or purchase, which could limit our ability to retain residents, lease apartment units or increase or maintain rents at our apartment communities.

The apartment communities we have or may invest in may compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including single-family homes and condominiums available for rent or purchase. Such competitive housing alternatives may become more prevalent in a particular area because of the tightening of mortgage lending underwriting criteria, homeowner foreclosures, the decline in single-family home and condominium sales, and the lack of available credit. The number of single-family homes and condominiums for rent in a particular area could limit our ability to retain residents, lease apartment units, or increase or maintain rents.

In addition, the increasing affordability of single-family homes and condominiums available to purchase caused by low mortgage interest rates and government programs to promote home ownership could adversely affect our ability to retain our residents, lease apartment units and increase or maintain rental rates.

Our property manager’s failure to integrate its subcontractors into its operations in an efficient manner could reduce the return on your investment.

Our property manager may rely on multiple subcontractors for on-site property management of our properties. If our property manager is unable to integrate these subcontractors into its operations in an efficient manner, our property manager may have to expend substantial time and money coordinating with these subcontractors, which could be a negative impact on the revenues generated from such properties.

We are dependent on third-party managers if we acquire hotel properties.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we are unable to operate a hotel property or participate in the decisions affecting the daily operations of a hotel. We would lease any hotels we acquire to a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) in which we would own a 100% interest. Our TRS would enter into a management agreement with an eligible independent contractor that is not our subsidiary or otherwise controlled by us to manage the hotel. Thus, an independent hotel operator, under a management agreement with our TRS, would control the daily operations of any hotel we acquire.

We would depend on the independent management company to adequately operate any hotel we would acquire as provided for in a management agreement. We would not have the authority to require hotels we acquire to be operated in a particular manner or to govern any particular aspect of the daily operations of the hotel (for instance, setting room rates). Thus, even if we believe a hotel is being operated inefficiently or in a manner that does not result in satisfactory occupancy rates, average daily rates (“ADR”), and resulting revenue per available room (“RevPar”), we may not be able to force the management company to change its method of operation of the hotel. We can only seek redress if a management company violates the terms of the applicable management agreement with the TRS, and then only to the extent of the remedies provided for under the terms of the management agreement. In the event that we need to replace a management company, we may be required by the terms of the management agreement to pay substantial termination fees and may experience significant disruptions at the hotel.

We may have to make significant capital expenditures to maintain any hotels we acquire.

Hotels have an ongoing need for renovations and other capital improvements, including replacements of furniture, fixtures and equipment. Generally, we would be responsible for the costs of these capital improvements, which give rise to the following risks:

If we have insufficient cash flow from operations to fund needed capital expenditures, then we would need to borrow to fund future capital improvements.

General economic conditions and discretionary consumer spending may affect any hotel property we acquire and lower the return on your investment.

The operations of a hotel property in which we invest, depend upon a number of factors relating to discretionary consumer spending. Unfavorable local, regional or national economic developments or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects as a result of terrorist attacks, military activity or natural disasters could reduce consumer spending in the market in which we own a hotel property and adversely affect its operations. Consumer spending on luxury goods, travel and other leisure activities such as boating, skiing and health and spa activities may decline as a result of lower consumer confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are favorable. In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately large reductions in expenditures on luxury goods, travel and other leisure activities. Our hotel may be unable to maintain its profitability during periods of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence, which could in turn affect the ability of the operator to make scheduled rent payments to us.

Seasonal revenue variations at any hotel property we acquire would require the operator to manage cash flow properly over time to meet its non-seasonal scheduled rent payments to us.

Most hotel properties are seasonal in nature. As a result of the seasonal nature, the hotel could experience seasonal variations in revenues that may require the operator to supplement revenue at the hotel in order to be able to make scheduled rent payments to us. The failure of an operator to manage its cash flow properly may result in the operator having insufficient cash on hand to make its scheduled payments to us during seasonally slow periods, which may adversely affect our cash flow from operations.

Adverse weather conditions at hotels we acquire may affect its operations or reduce our operators’ ability to make scheduled rent payments to us, which could reduce our cash flow from the hotel.

Adverse weather conditions may influence revenues at hotel investments. These adverse weather conditions might include hurricanes, tropical storms, high winds, heat waves, drought (or merely reduced rainfall levels), excessive rain and floods. For example, adverse weather could reduce the number of people that visit hotel properties. Hotel properties may be susceptible to damage from weather conditions such as hurricanes, which damage (including but not limited to property damage and loss of revenue) is not generally insurable at commercially reasonable rates. Poor weather conditions could also disrupt operations at hotel properties and could adversely affect both the value of our investments and the ability of our operators to make their scheduled rent payments to us.

Security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber-intrusions, or otherwise, could disrupt our IT networks and related systems.

Risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, or otherwise, against persons inside our organization, persons with access to systems inside our organization, the U.S. government, financial markets or institutions, or major businesses, including tenants, could disrupt or disable networks and related systems, other critical infrastructures, and the normal operation of business.  The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber-intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber-terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased.  Even though we may not be specifically targeted, cyber-attacks on the U.S. government, financial markets, financial institutions, or other major businesses, including tenants, could disrupt our normal business operations and networks, which may in turn have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our information technology (“IT”) networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations and they are subject to cybersecurity risks and threats.  They also may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants.  Further, our Advisor provides our IT services, and there can be no assurance that their security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. It has been reported that unknown entities or groups have mounted cyber-attacks on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems, and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected.  Due to the nature of cyber-attacks, breaches to our systems could go unnoticed for a prolonged period of time. These cybersecurity risks could disrupt our operations and result in downtime, loss of revenue, or the loss of critical data as well as result in higher costs to correct and remedy the effects of such incidents. If our systems for protecting against cyber incidents or attacks prove to be insufficient and an incident were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. While, to date, we have not experienced a cyber-attack or cyber-intrusion, neither our Advisor nor we may be able to anticipate or implement adequate security barriers or other preventive measures.  A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could:

Any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

The costs of compliance with environmental laws and other governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect our income.

All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or operators for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal. In addition, the presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to use the property as collateral for future borrowing.

Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require material expenditures by us. For example, various federal, regional and state laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Among other things, “green” building codes may seek to reduce emissions through the imposition of standards for design, construction materials, water and energy usage and efficiency, and waste management. We are not aware of any such existing requirements that we believe will have a material impact on our current operations. However, future requirements could increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties or developing new properties.

Discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations (including those of foreign jurisdictions), a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances.

In addition, when excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing, as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold at any of our projects could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property or development project, which would reduce our operating results.

The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distributions to stockholders.

We must comply with the Fair Housing Amendment Act, with respect to our investments in apartment communities, which may decrease our cash flow from operations.

We must comply with the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 (“FHAA”), which requires that apartment communities first occupied after March 13, 1991 be accessible to handicapped residents and visitors. Compliance with the FHAA could require removal of structural barriers to handicapped access in a community, including the interiors of apartment units covered under the FHAA. Recently, there has been heightened scrutiny of multifamily housing communities for compliance with the requirements of the FHAA and an increasing number of substantial enforcement actions and private lawsuits have been brought against apartment communities to ensure compliance with these requirements. Noncompliance with the FHAA could result in the imposition of fines, awards of damages to private litigants, payment of attorneys’ fees and other costs to plaintiffs, substantial litigation costs and substantial costs of remediation.

Risks Associated with Debt Financing

We incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which increases our business risks.

We have and currently expect to continue to acquire real properties and other real estate-related investments by using either existing financing or borrowing new funds. We also may borrow funds for payment of cash distributions to stockholders, in particular if necessary to satisfy the requirement that we distribute to stockholders at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income, or otherwise as is necessary or advisable to assure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and/or avoid federal income tax.

There is no limitation on the amount we may invest in or borrow related to any single property or other investment. Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness shall not exceed 300% of our “net assets” (as defined in our charter) as of the date of any borrowing; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors.

In addition to our charter limitation, our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests. Our policy limitation, however, does not apply to individual real estate assets. For these purposes, the value of our assets is based on methodologies and policies determined by the board of directors and may include, but do not require, independent appraisals.

We have not and do not intend to incur mortgage debt on a particular real property unless we believe the property’s projected cash flow is sufficient to service the mortgage debt. However, if there is a shortfall in cash flow available to service our mortgage debt, then our cash flow from operations will be adversely affected. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss because (i) loss in investment value is generally borne entirely by the borrower until such time as the investment value declines below the principal balance of the associated debt and (ii) defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and our loss of the property securing the loan that is in default. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds from the foreclosure. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt to the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, there is a risk that more than one real property may be affected by a default. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, your overall investment return will be adversely affected.

If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to refinance our properties, which could reduce the overall return on your investment.

When we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when the properties are refinanced, we may not be able to finance the properties at reasonable rates and our income could be reduced. If this occurs, it would reduce the overall return on your investment, and it may prevent us from borrowing more money.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make cash distributions to our stockholders.

In connection with obtaining financing, a lender could impose restrictions on us that affect our ability to incur additional debt, to make distributions and operating policies. In general, we expect our loan agreements to restrict our ability to encumber or otherwise transfer our interest in the respective property without the prior consent of the lender. Loan documents we enter may contain other customary negative covenants that may limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage, replace our Advisor or impose other limitations. Any such restriction or limitation may have an adverse effect on our operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default and ultimately may reduce our funds available for cash distribution to our stockholders.

We have and expect to continue to finance certain of our property acquisitions using interest-only mortgage indebtedness. During the interest-only period, the amount of each scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during this period. After the interest-only period, we will be required either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. These required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan. If the mortgage loan has an adjustable interest rate, the amount of our scheduled payments also may increase at a time of rising interest rates. Increased payments and substantial principal or balloon maturity payments will reduce the funds available for cash distribution to our stockholders because cash otherwise available for distributions will be required to pay principal and interest associated with these mortgage loans.

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect the overall return on your investment.

We have and expect to continue to incur indebtedness that bears interest at a variable rate. In addition, from time to time we may pay mortgage loans or finance and refinance our properties in a rising interest rate environment. Accordingly, increases in interest rates could increase our interest costs, which could have an adverse effect on our operating cash flow. In addition, if rising interest rates cause us to need additional capital to repay indebtedness in accordance with its terms or otherwise, we may need to liquidate one or more of our investments at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. Prolonged interest rate increases could also negatively impact our ability to make investments with positive economic returns.

Financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations may adversely affect the overall return on your investment.

Some of our financing arrangements require us to make a lump-sum or balloon payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or our ability to sell the property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to stockholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT and/or avoid federal income tax. Any of these results would have a significant, negative impact on your investment.

The lender on our 22 Exchange loan (outstanding balance of approximately $19.0 million as of December 31, 2017) elected to sweep the cash from operations for this property beginning in January 2018 because we did not meet the required debt service coverage ratio for any of the quarters during 2017. Additionally, the cash from operations was not sufficient to fully pay the scheduled monthly debt service due on January 5, 2018, which constituted an event of default and therefore, the 22 Exchange loan which was scheduled to mature in May 2023 is now due on demand. We received notice on January 9, 2018 that the 22 Exchange loan had been transferred to a special servicer effective immediately. Subsequently, the special servicer placed the property in receivership and commenced foreclosure proceedings. However, we believe the loss of cash flow and the expected loss of this property will not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

In addition to the 22 Exchange loan, as of March 16, 2018, the Company had aggregate balloon payments totaling approximately $56.6 million associated with (i) River Club and the Townhomes at River Club ($23.4 million due at scheduled maturity date of May 1, 2018), (ii) Parkside ($9.6 million due at scheduled maturity date of June 1, 2018) and (iii) Arbors Harbor Town ($23.6 million due at maturity date of January 1, 2019) maturing over the next twelve months.

We have broad authority to incur debt, and high debt levels could decrease the value of your investment.

Our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets, but we may exceed this limit under some circumstances. Such debt may be at a level that is higher than real estate investment trusts with similar investment objectives or criteria. High debt levels could cause us to incur higher interest charges, could result in higher debt service payments, and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. These factors could result in a decline in the value of your investment.

Risks Associated with Investments in Mortgage, Bridge and Mezzanine Loans

Mezzanine loans may be impacted by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of the loan and the return on your investment.

We have and may continue to invest in mezzanine loans and we may be at risk of defaults on the loans caused by many conditions beyond our control, including local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values and interest rate levels. We do not know whether the value of the property securing any loan will remain at the levels existing on the date we complete the underwriting of the loan. If the value of an underlying property declines, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with the loan.

Our mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations, which could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates and reduce the value of the loans in the event we sell them.

We have and may continue to invest in fixed-rate, long-term mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans. If interest rates rise, the loans could yield a return lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we would be adversely affected to the extent that mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans are prepaid, because we may not be able to make new loans at the previously higher interest rate. If we invest in variable-rate loans and interest rates decrease, our revenues also decrease. When interest rates increase on our variable-rate loans, the value of the loans we own at such time would decrease, which would lower the proceeds we would receive in the event we sell such assets. For these reasons, our returns on these types of loans and the value of your investment will be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.

Delays in liquidating a defaulted mezzanine loan could reduce our investment returns.

If there is a default under a mezzanine loan, we may not be able to repossess and quickly sell the property securing the loan. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of the investment in the defaulted loan. An action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of any lawsuit brought in connection with the foreclosure if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the loan.

The mezzanine loans in which we may invest involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real properties.

We have and may continue to invest in mezzanine loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the real property or the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the real property. This type of investment involves a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income producing real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. Further, the borrower of these loans may be a real estate developer, and the investment may involve additional risks, including dependence for repayment on successful completion and operation of the project, difficulties in estimating construction or rehabilitation costs and loan terms that often require little or no amortization. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of the entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our loan or on debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our loan would be satisfied only after the senior debt is paid in full. Where debt senior to our loan exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies (through “standstill periods”), and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment.

Foreclosures create additional ownership risks that could adversely impact our returns on mortgage investments.

If we acquire property by foreclosure following a default under a mezzanine loan, we will have the economic and liability risks as the owner.

The liquidation of our assets may be delayed as a result of our investment in mezzanine loans, which could delay cash distributions to our stockholders.

Mezzanine loans we may originate are particularly illiquid investments due to their short life, unsuitability for securitization and greater difficulty of recoupment in the event of a borrower’s default. Any intended liquidation of us may be delayed beyond the time of the sale of all of our properties until the mezzanine loans expire or are sold.

Risks Related to Our Operations

To hedge against exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective and may reduce the overall returns on your investment and affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders.

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in exchange rates and interest rates on loans secured by our assets. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from time to time. Our hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:

Any hedging activity we engage in may adversely affect our earnings, which could adversely affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged or liabilities being hedged may vary materially. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the interest rate risk sought to be hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended accounting treatment and may expose us to risk of loss.

To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and your overall investment return will be adversely affected.

Hedging instruments often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities and involve risks and costs.

The cost of using hedging instruments increases as the period covered by the instrument increases and during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. We may increase our hedging activity and thus increase our hedging costs during periods when interest rates are volatile or rising and hedging costs have increased. In addition, hedging instruments involve risk since they often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities. Consequently, there are no requirements with respect to record keeping, financial responsibility or segregation of customer funds and positions. Furthermore, the enforceability of agreements underlying derivative transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory, commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. The business failure of a hedging counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction will most likely result in a default. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of unrealized profits and force us to cover our resale commitments, if any, at the then current market price. It may not always be possible to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract in order to cover our risk. We cannot be certain that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.

The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”) may limit our ability to hedge our assets and operations. Under these provisions, any income that we generate from transactions intended to hedge our interest rate, inflation and/or currency risks will be excluded from gross income for purposes of the REIT 75% and 95% gross income tests if the instrument hedges (i) interest rate risk on liabilities incurred to carry or acquire real estate; (ii) risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying income under the REIT 75% or 95% gross income tests; or (iii) to manage risk with respect to the termination of prior hedging transactions described in (i) and/or (ii) above, and in each case, such instrument is properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations. Income from hedging transactions that do not meet these requirements will generally constitute nonqualifying income for purposes of both the REIT 75% and 95% gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may have to limit our use of hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous, which could result in greater risks associated with interest rate or other changes than we would otherwise incur.

There can be no assurance that the direct or indirect effects of the Dodd-Frank Act and other applicable non-U.S. regulations will not have an adverse effect on our interest rate hedging activities.

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) imposed additional regulations on derivatives markets and transactions. Such regulations and, to the extent we trade with counterparties organized in non-US jurisdictions, any applicable regulations in those jurisdictions, are still being implemented, and will affect our interest rate hedging activities. While the full impact of the regulation on our interest rate hedging activities cannot be fully assessed until all final rules and regulations are implemented, such regulation may affect our ability to enter into hedging or other risk management transactions, may increase our costs in entering into such transactions, and/or may result in us entering into such transactions on less favorable terms than prior to implementation of such regulation. For example, but not by way of limitation, the Dodd-Frank Act and the rulemaking thereunder provides for significantly increased regulation of the derivative transactions used to affect our interest rate hedging activities, including: (i) regulatory reporting, (ii) subject to an exemption for end-users of swaps upon which we and our subsidiaries generally rely, mandated clearing of certain derivatives transactions through central counterparties and execution on regulated exchanges or execution facilities and, (iii) to the extent we are required to clear any such transactions, margin and collateral requirements. The imposition, or the failure to comply with, any of the foregoing requirements may have an adverse effect on our business and our stockholders’ return.

Potential reforms to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could adversely affect us.

There is significant uncertainty surrounding the futures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Through their lender originator networks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are significant lenders to buyers of multifamily real estate. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have a mandate to support multifamily housing through their financing activities and any changes to their mandates, further reductions in their size or the scale of their activities, or loss of their key personnel could have a significant impact on us and may, among other things, adversely affect values for multifamily assets, interest rates, capital availability, and potential sales of multifamily communities which in turn could adversely affect our ability to dispose of our multifamily assets. Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s regulator has set overall volume limits on most of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s lending activities. The regulator in the future could require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to focus more of their lending activities on small borrowers or properties the regulator deems affordable, which may or may not include our assets, which could also adversely impact us.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

A limit on the number of shares a person may own may discourage a takeover.

Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of directors, no person may own more than 9.8% of our outstanding shares of common or preferred stock. This restriction may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might otherwise provide stockholders with the opportunity to receive a control premium for their shares.

Our charter permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or discourage a third party from acquiring us.

Our charter permits our board of directors to issue up to 400,001,000 shares of capital stock. Our board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, may (i) increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares, (ii) increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series we have authority to issue, or (iii) classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Thus, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of such stock with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.

Maryland law prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired.

Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:

A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he/she otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board.

After the expiration of the five-year period described above, any business combination between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder must generally be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:

These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. Maryland law also permits various exemptions from these provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board of directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. The business combination statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.

Maryland law also limits the ability of a third party to buy a large stake in us and exercise voting power in electing directors.

Maryland law provides a second anti-takeover statute, the Control Share Acquisition Act, which provides that “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” have no voting rights except to the extent approved by the corporation’s disinterested stockholders by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares of stock owned by interested stockholders, that is, by the acquirer, by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation, are excluded from the vote on whether to accord voting rights to the control shares. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock that would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within specified ranges of voting power. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of control shares. The control share acquisition statute does not apply to (i) shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (ii) acquisitions approved or exempted by a corporation’s charter or bylaws. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of shares of our stock. We can offer no assurance that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future. This statute could have the effect of discouraging offers from third parties to acquire us and increasing the difficulty of successfully completing this type of offer by anyone other than our affiliates or any of their affiliates.

Our charter includes an anti-takeover provision that may discourage a stockholder from launching a tender offer for our shares.

Our charter provides that any tender offer made by a stockholder, including any “mini-tender” offer, must comply with most provisions of Regulation 14D of the Exchange Act. The offering stockholder must provide us notice of such tender offer at least ten business days before initiating the tender offer. If the offering stockholder does not comply with these requirements, we will have the right to redeem that stockholder’s shares and any shares acquired in such tender offer. In addition, the non-complying stockholder shall be responsible for all of our expenses in connection with that stockholder’s noncompliance. This provision of our charter may discourage a stockholder from initiating a tender offer for our shares and prevent a stockholder from receiving a premium price for his shares in such a transaction.

Stockholders have limited control over changes in our policies and operations.

Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the stockholders. Under our charter and the Maryland General Corporation Law, our stockholders currently have a right to vote only on the following matters:

All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board of directors.

Our board of directors may change our investment policies and objectives generally and at the individual investment level without stockholder approval, which could alter the nature of your investment.

Our charter requires that our independent directors review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interests of the stockholders. In addition to our investment policies and objectives, we may also change our stated strategy for any investment in an individual property. These policies may change over time. The methods of implementing our investment policies may also vary, as new investment techniques are developed. Our investment policies, the methods for their implementation, and our other objectives, policies and procedures may be altered by our board of directors without the approval of our stockholders. As a result, the nature of your investment could change without your consent.

Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited.

Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter eliminates our directors’ and officers’ liability to us and our shareholders for money damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and which is material to the cause of action. In addition, our charter requires us to indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law for liability actually incurred in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party, except to the extent that the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was either committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services, or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. As a result, we and our shareholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers.

Federal Income Tax Risks

Failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our operations and our ability to make cash distributions.

In order for us to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy certain requirements set forth in the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations and various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. We intend to structure our activities in a manner designed to satisfy all of these requirements. However, if certain of our operations were to be recharacterized by the Internal Revenue Service, such recharacterization could jeopardize our ability to satisfy all of the requirements for qualification as a REIT and may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, new legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualifying as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of qualifying.

Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet, through investments, actual operating results, distributions and satisfaction of specific stockholder rules, the various tests imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. We cannot assure you that we will satisfy the REIT requirements in the future. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income for that year at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends-paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return on your investment.

Qualification as a REIT is subject to the satisfaction of tax requirements and various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. New legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of being a REIT. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect your return on your investment.

Our investment strategy may cause us to incur penalty taxes, lose our REIT status, or own and sell properties through taxable REIT subsidiaries, each of which would diminish the return to our stockholders.

In light of our opportunistic and value-add investment strategy and our current disposition strategy, it is possible that one or more sales of our properties may be considered “prohibited transactions” under the Internal Revenue Code. Any subdivision of property, such as the sale of condominiums, would almost certainly be considered such a prohibited transaction. If we are deemed to have engaged in a “prohibited transaction” (i.e., we sell a property held by us primarily for sale in the ordinary course of our trade or business) all net income that we derive from such sale would be subject to a 100% penalty tax. The Internal Revenue Code sets forth a safe harbor for REITs that wish to sell property without risking the imposition of the 100% penalty tax. A principal requirement of the safe harbor is that the REIT must hold the applicable property for not less than two years prior to its sale. Given our opportunistic and value-add investment strategy, along with our current disposition strategy, the sale of one or more of our properties may not fall within the prohibited transaction safe harbor.

If we desire to sell a property pursuant to a transaction that does not fall within the safe harbor, we may be able to avoid the 100% penalty tax if we acquired the property through a TRS or acquired the property and transferred it to a TRS for a non-tax business purpose prior to the sale (i.e., for a reason other than the avoidance of taxes). However, there may be circumstances that prevent us from using a TRS in a transaction that does not qualify for the safe harbor. Additionally, even if it is possible to effect a property disposition through a TRS, we may decide to forgo the use of a TRS in a transaction that does not meet the safe harbor, based on our own internal analysis, the opinion of counsel or the opinion of other tax advisors that the disposition will not be subject to the 100% penalty tax. In cases where a property disposition is not effected through a TRS, the Internal Revenue Service could successfully assert that the disposition constitutes a prohibited transaction, in which event all of the net income from the sale of such property will be payable as a tax and none of the proceeds from such sale will be distributable by us to our stockholders or available for investment by us.

If we acquire a property that we anticipate will not fall within the safe harbor from the 100% penalty tax upon disposition, then we may acquire such property through a TRS in order to avoid the possibility that the sale of such property will be a prohibited transaction and subject to the 100% penalty tax. If we already own such a property directly or indirectly through an entity other than a TRS, we may contribute the property to a TRS if there is another, non-tax related business purpose for the contribution of such property to the TRS. Following the transfer of the property to a TRS, the TRS will operate the property and may sell such property and distribute the net proceeds from such sale to us, and we may distribute the net proceeds distributed to us by the TRS to our stockholders. Though a sale of the property by a TRS likely would eliminate the danger of the application of the 100% penalty tax, the TRS itself would be subject to a tax at the federal level, and potentially at the state and local levels, on the gain realized by it from the sale of the property, as well as on the income earned while the property is operated by the TRS. In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it receives or on some deductions taken by a TRS if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers, and the TRS are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties. This tax obligation would diminish the amount of the proceeds from the sale of such property that would be distributable to our stockholders. As a result, the amount available for distribution to our stockholders would be substantially less than if the REIT had not operated and sold such property through the TRS and such transaction was not successfully characterized as a prohibited transaction. The maximum federal corporate income tax rate currently is 35%. Federal, state and local corporate income tax rates may be increased in the future, and any such increase would reduce the amount of the net proceeds available for distribution by us to our stockholders from the sale of property through a TRS after the effective date of any increase in such tax rates.

As a REIT, the value of the non-mortgage securities we hold in all of our TRSs may not exceed 25% (20% for taxable years after 2017) of the value of all of our assets at the end of any calendar quarter. If the Internal Revenue Service were to determine that the value of our interests in all of our TRSs exceeded this limit at the end of any calendar quarter, then we would fail to qualify as a REIT. If we determine it to be in our best interests to own a substantial number of our properties through one or more TRSs, then it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service may conclude that the value of our interests in our TRSs exceeds 25% (or 20%, as applicable) of the value of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter and therefore cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT. Additionally, as a REIT, no more than 25% of our gross income with respect to any year may be from sources other than real estate. Distributions paid to us from a TRS are considered to be non-real estate income. Therefore, we may fail to qualify as a REIT if distributions from all of our TRSs, when aggregated with all other non-real estate income with respect to any one year, are more than 25% of our gross income with respect to such year. We will use all reasonable efforts to structure our activities in a manner intended to satisfy the requirements for our continued qualification as a REIT. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return on your investment.

Certain fees paid to us may affect our REIT status.

Income received in the nature of fees or noncustomary services, in some cases, may not qualify as rental income and could be characterized by the Internal Revenue Service as non-qualifying income for purposes of satisfying the “income tests” required for REIT qualification. If this income were, in fact, treated as non-qualifying, and if the aggregate of such income and any other non-qualifying income in any taxable year ever exceeded 5% of our gross revenues for such year, we could lose our REIT status for that taxable year and the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. We will use commercially reasonable efforts to structure our activities in a manner intended to satisfy the requirements for our continued qualification as a REIT. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return on your investment.

If our operating partnership fails to maintain its status as a partnership, its income may be subject to taxation, which would reduce the cash available to us for distributions to our stockholders.

We intend to maintain the status of the Operating Partnership as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. However, if the Internal Revenue Service were to successfully challenge the status of the operating partnership as an entity taxable as a partnership, the Operating Partnership would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that the operating partnership could make to us. This could also result in our losing REIT status, and becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our income. This would substantially reduce the cash available to us to make distributions and the return on your investment. In addition, if any of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which the operating partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to the operating partnership. Such a recharacterization of an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain REIT status.

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal, state and foreign taxes, which would reduce our cash available for distributions to our stockholders.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may become subject to federal and state taxes, including alternative minimum tax (“AMT”). In addition, we may be subject to foreign taxes on our investments. For example, if we have net income from a “prohibited transaction,” such income will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our assets and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. We may also be subject to state and local taxes, including potentially the “margin tax” in the State of Texas, on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the operating partnership or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any federal, state or foreign taxes paid by us will reduce the cash available to us for distributions to our stockholders.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect the returns to our investors.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of the federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on your investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares. You also should note that our counsel’s tax opinion is based upon existing law and Treasury Regulations, applicable as of the date of its opinion, all of which are subject to change, either prospectively or retroactively.

Distributions that we make to our taxable stockholders out of current and accumulated earnings and profits (and not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) generally will be taxable as ordinary income. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, noncorporate stockholders are entitled to a 20% deduction with respect to these ordinary REIT dividends which would, if allowed in full, result in a maximum effective federal income tax rate on them of 29.6% (or 33.4% including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income). However, a portion of our distributions may (1) constitute a return of capital generally to the extent that they exceed our accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (2) be designated by us as capital gain dividends generally taxable as long-term capital gain to the extent that they are attributable to net capital gain recognized by us, or (3) be designated by us as qualified dividend income, taxable at capital gains rates, generally to the extent they are attributable to dividends we receive from our TRSs. A return of capital is not taxable, but has the effect of reducing the basis of a stockholder’s investment in our Common Shares. Distributions that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits and a stockholder’s tax basis in our common stock generally will be taxable as capital gain.

As a REIT, we generally would not be subject to federal or state corporate income taxes on that portion of our ordinary income or capital gain that we distribute currently to our stockholders, and we thus expect to avoid the “double taxation” to which other corporations are typically subject. It is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be taxed for federal income tax purposes as a corporation. As a result, our charter provides our board of directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interests of our stockholders.

Equity participation in mortgage, bridge, mezzanine or other loans may result in taxable income and gains from these properties that could adversely impact our REIT status.

If we participate under a loan in any appreciation of the properties securing the mortgage loan or its cash flow and the Internal Revenue Service characterizes this participation as “equity,” we might have to recognize income, gains and other items from the property for federal income tax purposes. This could affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

Our investments in debt instruments may cause us to recognize “phantom income” for federal income tax purposes even though no cash payments have been received on the debt instruments.

We may acquire debt instruments in the secondary market for less than their face amount. The amount of such discount will generally be treated as “market discount” for federal income tax purposes. We may acquire distressed debt investments that are subsequently modified by agreement with the borrower. If the amendments to the outstanding debt are “significant modifications” under the applicable Treasury regulations, the modified debt may be considered to have been reissued to us in a debt-for-debt exchange with the borrower. This deemed reissuance may prevent the modified debt from qualifying as a good REIT asset if the underlying security has declined in value.

In general, we will be required to accrue original issue discount on a debt instrument as taxable income in accordance with applicable federal income tax rules even though no cash payments may be received on such debt instrument.

In the event a borrower with respect to a particular debt instrument encounters financial difficulty rendering it unable to pay stated interest as due, we may nonetheless be required to continue to recognize the unpaid interest as taxable income. Similarly, we may be required to accrue interest income with respect to investments in commercial mortgage-backed securities at the stated rate regardless of when their corresponding cash payments are received.

As a result of these factors, there is a significant risk that we may recognize substantial taxable income in excess of cash available for distribution. In that event, we may need to borrow funds or take other action to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements for the taxable year in which this “phantom income” is recognized.

REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.

We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain, in order to maintain our REIT qualification. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed REIT taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under federal tax laws. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our income for financial reporting purposes, or our taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distributions to stockholders (for example, where a borrower defers the payment of interest in cash pursuant to a contractual right or otherwise). If we do not have other funds available in these situations we could be required to borrow funds, sell investments at disadvantageous prices or find another alternative source of funds to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

Risks Related to Investments by Benefit Plans Subject to ERISA and Certain Tax-Exempt Entities (including IRAs)

If the fiduciary of an employee pension benefit plan subject to ERISA (such as profit sharing, Section 401(k) or pension plan) or any other retirement plan or account fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code as a result of an investment in our stock, you could be subject to criminal and civil penalties.

There are special considerations that apply to employee benefit plans subject to ERISA (such as profit sharing, section 401(k) or pension plans) and other retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (such as an IRA) that are investing in our shares. If you are investing the assets of such a plan or account in our common stock, you should satisfy yourself that:

With respect to the annual valuation requirements described above, we currently expect to provide an estimated value for our shares annually. For information regarding our NAV per Share, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of equity Securities - Market Information” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We can make no claim whether such estimated value will or will not satisfy the applicable annual valuation requirements under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The Department of Labor or the Internal Revenue Service may determine that a plan fiduciary or an IRA custodian is required to take further steps to determine the value of our common stock. In the absence of an appropriate determination of value, a plan fiduciary or an IRA custodian may be subject to damages, penalties or other sanctions.

Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties and could subject the fiduciary to claims for damages or for equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our shares constitutes a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, the fiduciary or IRA owner who authorized or directed the investment or a related party may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested. In the case of a prohibited transaction involving an IRA owner, the IRA may be disqualified and all of the assets of the IRA may be deemed distributed and subjected to tax. ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA custodians should consult with counsel before making an investment in our common shares.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2.    Properties.

General

The following table presents certain additional information about our consolidated investments in real estate as of December 31, 2017:

The following information generally applies to our consolidated investments in our real estate properties:

Portfolio Diversification

As an opportunistic and value-add fund, we utilize a business model driven by investment strategy and expected performance characteristics. Accordingly, we have investments in several types of real estate, including office, multifamily, and student housing.

The following table shows the total revenues of our real estate portfolio for the properties we consolidated in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

Geographic Diversification

The following table shows the geographic diversification of our real estate portfolio for those properties that we consolidate in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 excluding revenues generated from our disposed properties (dollars in thousands):

See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding how geographic concentration may be considered in the evaluation of our investments for impairment.

Future Lease Payments Table

The following table presents the future minimum base rental payments due to us under non-cancelable leases over the next ten years at our office property, Gardens Medical Pavilion, and the retail space at 22 Exchange as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

Portfolio Lease Expirations

The following table presents lease expirations for non-cancelable leases for our medical office building, Gardens Medical Pavilion, and the retail space at 22 Exchange as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

We are not party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosure.

None

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

There currently is no established public trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is a risk that a stockholder may not be able to sell our stock at a time or price acceptable to the stockholder. Unless and until our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, it is not expected that a public market for the shares will develop.

Estimated Net Asset Value (“NAV”) and NAV per Share of Common Stock (“NAV per Share”)

On December 4, 2017, pursuant to the Policy for Estimation of Common Stock Value (the “Estimated Valuation Policy”), our board of directors determined and approved our estimated NAV of approximately $198.7 million and resulting estimated NAV per Share of $7.98, both as of September 30, 2017

We believe there have not been any material changes to the net value of our assets and liabilities that existed as of September 30, 2017 and the date of this filing

Process and Methodology

Our business is managed by an external advisor and we have no employees. On February 10, 2017, we engaged affiliates of the Lightstone Group (“Lightstone”), LSG-BH II Advisor LLC and LSG Development Advisor LLC (collectively, the “Advisor”), to provide advisory services to us. Our Advisor, along with any necessary material assistance or confirmation of a third-party valuation expert or service, is responsible for calculating our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share, which we currently expect will be done on at least an annual basis unless and until our shares of common stock are approved for listing on a national securities exchange. Our board of directors will review and approve each estimate of NAV and resulting NAV per Share.

Our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share as of September 30, 2017 were calculated with both the assistance of our Advisor and Capright Property Advisors, LLC (“Capright”), an independent third-party valuation firm engaged to assist with the valuation of our assets and liabilities, assuming a liquidation event. Our Advisor recommended and our board of directors established the estimated NAV per Share based upon the analyses and reports provided by our Advisor and Capright. The process of estimating the value of our assets and liabilities is performed in accordance with our Estimated Valuation Policy and the provisions of the Investment Program Association Practice Guideline 2013-01, “Valuation of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs.” We believe our valuations were developed in a manner reasonably designed to ensure their reliability.

In arriving at an estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share, our board of directors reviewed and considered the valuation analyses prepared by the Advisor and Capright. The Advisor presented a report to the board of directors with an estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share. Capright provided our board of directors an opinion that the resulting “as-is” market value for the Company’s properties, as calculated by the Advisor, and the other assets and liabilities as valued by the Advisor, along with the corresponding net asset value valuation methodologies and assumptions used by the Advisor to arrive at a recommended NAV per Share of $7.98 as of September 30, 2017 were appropriate and reasonable. The board of directors conferred with the Advisor and a representative from Capright regarding the methodologies and assumptions used to reach their respective conclusions. The board of directors, which is responsible for determining the estimated per share value, considered all information provided in light of its own familiarity with our assets and unanimously approved a NAV per Share of $7.98 as of September 30, 2017.

The engagement of Capright with respect to our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share as of September 30, 2017 was approved by our board of directors, including all of our independent directors. Capright has extensive experience in conducting asset valuations, including valuations of commercial real estate, debt, properties and real estate-related investments.

Capright’s opinion was subject to various limitations. In forming its opinion, Capright relied on certain information provided by our Advisor and third parties without independent verification. Our Advisor provided Capright with certain information regarding lease terms and the physical condition and capital expenditure requirements of each property. Capright did not perform engineering or structural studies or environmental studies of any of the properties, nor did they perform an independent appraisal of the other assets and liabilities included in our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share.

In forming their conclusion as to the “as-is” value of the real estate investments held by the Company as of September 30, 2017, Capright’s opinion was subject to various limitations. For the appraisals of the Company’s six properties and mezzanine loan investment performed by Capright, the scope of their work included:

Capright also evaluated the following information to arrive at their opinion:

Capright has acted as a valuation advisor to the Company in connection with this assignment. The compensation paid to Capright in connection with this assignment was not contingent upon the successful completion of any transaction or conclusion reached by Capright. Capright previously rendered valuation advisory services to another investment program sponsored by the Company’s previous external advisor for which it received usual and customary compensation. Capright may be engaged to provide financial advisory services to the Company, its Advisor, or other Lightstone-sponsored investment programs or their affiliates in the future.

The following is a summary of the valuation methodologies used for each type of asset:

Investments in Real Estate. The Company has generally focused on acquiring commercial real estate properties in different asset classes, some of which required development, redevelopment, or repositioning. Capright and our Advisor utilized a variety of valuation methodologies, each as appropriate for the asset type under consideration to assign an estimated value to each asset.

Our Advisor estimated the value of our investments in real estate utilizing multiple valuation methods, as appropriate for each asset, including an income approach using discounted cash flow analysis and a sales comparable analysis. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow approach were specific to each property type, market location, and quality of each property and were based on similar investors’ return expectations and market assessments. The key assumptions are reflected in the table included under “Allocation of Estimated NAV per Share” below. In calculating values for our assets, our Advisor used balance sheet and cash flow estimates as of September 30, 2017.

In forming its opinion, Capright prepared appraisals on all six of our consolidated investment properties and our mezzanine loan investment in connection with the valuation. The appraisals estimated values by using discounted cash flow, comparable sales, or a weighting of these approaches in determining each property’s value. The appraisals employed a range of terminal capitalization rates, discount rates, growth rates, and other variables that fell within ranges that Capright and the Advisor believed would be used by similar investors to value the properties we own. The assumptions used in developing these estimates were specific to each property (including holding periods) and were determined based upon a number of factors including the market in which the property is located, the specific location of the property within the market, property and market vacancy, tenant demand for space, and investor demand and return requirements.

While we and our Advisor believe that the approaches used by appraisers in valuing our real estate assets, including an income approach using discounted cash flow analysis and sales comparable analysis, is standard in the real estate industry, the estimated values for our investments in real estate may or may not represent current market values or fair values determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Real estate is currently carried at its amortized cost basis in our financial statements, subject to any adjustments applicable under GAAP.

The value of our mezzanine loan investment was valued at the outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest and the current estimated value of the profit participation. The value of the profit participation was derived by valuing the project using a discounted cash flow analysis. The mezzanine loan investment is accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint venture on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017.

Cash and cash equivalents. The estimated value of our cash and cash equivalents approximate their carrying value due to their short term maturities.

Restricted cash. The estimated value of our restricted cash approximate their carrying value due to their short term maturities.

Notes payable. Values for our notes payable, which consist of mortgage loans, were estimated by the Advisor and reviewed by Capright using a discounted cash flow analysis, which used inputs based on the remaining loan terms and estimated current market interest rates for mortgage loans with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term and loan-to-value ratios. The current market interest rate was generally determined based on market rates for available comparable debt. The estimated current market interest rates for mortgage loans ranged from 1.3% to 4.3%.

Other assets and liabilities, net. Our other assets and liabilities, net consist of accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, payables to related parties, distributions payable to noncontrolling interests, income taxes payable, deferred gain, accrued property tax and accrued and other liabilities. For a majority of our other assets and liabilities, the carrying values as of September 30, 2017 were considered equal to fair value by the Advisor due to their cost-based characteristics or short maturities. Certain other items, primarily straight-line rent receivable, intangibles and deferred costs, have been eliminated for the purpose of the valuation because those items are already considered in our valuation of the respective investments in real estate operating properties or financial instruments (i.e., notes payable).

Noncontrolling Interests. In those situations where our consolidated operating properties are held in joint venture structures in which other equity holders have an interest, the Advisor has valued those noncontrolling interests based on the terms of the respective joint venture agreement applied assuming a liquidation of the joint venture as of the date of valuation. The resulting noncontrolling interests are a deduction to the estimated NAV.

Common Stock Outstanding. In deriving an estimated NAV per Share, the total estimated NAV was divided by 24.8 million, the total number of common shares outstanding as of September 30, 2017, on a fully diluted basis, which includes financial instruments that can be converted into a known or determinable number of common shares. As of the valuation date, none of our financial instruments that could be converted into common shares are currently convertible into a known or determinable number of common shares. The determination of the number of common shares outstanding used in the estimated NAV per Share is the same as used in GAAP computations for per share amounts.

Our estimated NAV per Share was calculated by aggregating the value of our assets, subtracting the value of our liabilities, and dividing the net amount by the fully-diluted shares of common stock outstanding, all as of September 30, 2017.

Allocation of Estimated NAV per Share

The table below sets forth the calculation of the Company’s estimated NAV per Share as of September 30, 2017, as well as the calculation of the Company’s prior estimated NAV per Share as of October 31, 2016. The estimated NAV per Share of $7.98 as of September 30, 2017, reflects an increase from the estimated NAV per Share of $7.80 as of October 31, 2016.

Notes:

The following are ranges of the key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow models to estimate the value of the real estate assets we currently own. The discounted cash flow analyses for our hotel asset is only one category as is our office asset, and therefore, no range of values is available.

The estimated values of the real estate investments we owned as of September 30, 2017 reflect an aggregate increase of 25.7% from their original purchase price (excluding acquisition costs and operating deficits) including amounts advanced under the mezzanine loan.

While we believe that our assumptions utilized are reasonable, a change in these assumptions would affect the calculation of the value of our real estate assets. The table below presents the estimated increase or decrease to our estimated NAV per Share resulting from a 25 basis point increase and decrease in the discount rates and capitalization rates. The table is presented to provide a hypothetical illustration of possible results if only one change in assumptions was made, with all other factors remaining constant. Further, each of these assumptions could change by more or less than 25 basis points or not at all.

Historical Estimated NAV per Share

The historical reported estimated NAV per Share of our common stock approved by the board of directors for the preceding two years are set forth below:

Note:

Limitations and Risks

As with any valuation methodology, the methodology used to determine our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may prove later not to be accurate or complete.  Further, different participants with different property-specific and general real estate and capital market assumptions, estimates, judgments and standards could derive a different estimated NAV per Share, which could be significantly different from the estimated NAV per Share approved by our board of directors.  The estimated NAV per Share approved by our board of directors does not represents the fair value of our assets and liabilities in accordance with GAAP, and such estimated NAV per Share is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that:

The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor do not provide any guidance on the methodology an issuer must use to determine its estimated NAV per share. FINRA guidance provides that NAV valuations be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice.

Our estimated NAV per Share is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities and other non-controlling interests divided by the number of our diluted shares of common stock outstanding, all as of the date indicated. Our estimated NAV per Share does not reflect a discount for the fact we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. Our estimated NAV per Share does not take into account estimated disposition costs or fees or penalties, if any, that may apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations or the impact of restrictions on the assumption of certain debt. Our estimated NAV per Share will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, future acquisitions or dispositions of assets, developments related to individual assets and the management of those assets and changes in the real estate and capital markets. Markets for real estate and real estate-related investments can fluctuate and values are expected to change in the future. Our Estimated Valuation Policy requires us to update our estimated NAV per Share value on at least an annual basis. Our board of directors will review and approve each estimate of NAV and resulting estimated NAV per Share.

The following factors may cause a stockholder not to ultimately realize distributions per share of common stock equal to the estimated NAV per Share upon liquidation:

For further information regarding the limitations of our estimated NAV per Share, see our Estimated Valuation Policy filed as Exhibit 99.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2017.

Holders

As of March 16, 2018, we had 24.6 million shares of common stock outstanding held by 10,420 stockholders.

Distributions

We made an election to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008. U.S. federal tax law requires a REIT distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. In order to continue to qualify for REIT status, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on their analysis of our performance over the previous periods and expectations of performance for future periods. Such analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions, proceeds from asset sales and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. Our board of directors’ decisions will be substantially influenced by their obligation to ensure that we maintain our federal tax status as a REIT. We cannot provide assurance that we will pay distributions at any particular level, or at all.

Our board of directors declared two special cash distributions during 2015, one on March 18, 2015 for a total of $25.7 million and one on November 20, 2015 for a total of $38.4 million, for an aggregate of $64.1 million, or $2.50 per share of common stock. We paid the $25.7 million special cash distribution on March 31, 2015 and the $38.4 million special cash distribution on January 5, 2016. The special cash distributions paid during 2016 and 2015 were fully funded with a portion of proceeds from asset sales. We did not make any special cash distributions during 2017. For further discussion regarding our ability to sustain any level of our distributions, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Effective December 19, 2017, we may longer grant any awards pursuant to the Incentive Award

Share Redemption Program

Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption program that permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us, subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the program. Our board of directors can amend the provisions of our share redemption program at any time without the approval of our stockholders.

The terms on which we redeem shares may differ between redemptions upon a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability” (as defined in the share redemption program) or confinement to a long-term care facility (collectively, Exceptional Redemptions) and all other redemptions or Ordinary Redemptions. From April 1, 2012 through May 15, 2014, our board of directors suspended accepting Ordinary Redemptions. On May 15, 2014, our board of directors adopted the Third Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program and reopened the share redemption program for Ordinary Redemptions, to be effective on that date.

The per share redemption price for Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions is currently equal to the lesser of 80% and 90%, respectively, of (i) the current estimated NAV per Share and (ii) the average price per share the investor paid for all of his shares (as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock) less the Special Distributions (as defined in the share redemption program).

Effective December 4, 2017, our estimated NAV per Share was $7.98. For a full description of the methodologies used to estimate the NAV per Share as of September 30, 2017, see “Estimated NAV and NAV per Share” disclosed above.

Notwithstanding the redemption prices set forth above, our board of directors may determine, whether pursuant to formulas or processes approved or set by our board of directors, the redemption price of the shares, which may differ between Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions; provided, however, that we must provide at least 30 days’ notice to stockholders before applying this new price determined by our board of directors.

Any shares approved for redemption will be redeemed on a periodic basis as determined from time to time by our board of directors, and no less frequently than annually.  We will not redeem, during any twelve-month period, more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption.  In addition, the cash available for redemptions is limited to no more than $10.0 million in any twelve-month period.  The redemption limitations apply to all redemptions, whether Ordinary or Exceptional Redemptions.

Any redemption requests are honored pro rata among all requests received based on funds available and are not honored on a first come, first served basis. During the three months ended December 31, 2017, our board of directors redeemed all 52 Ordinary Redemption requests received that complied with the applicable requirements and guidelines of the share redemption program for an aggregate of 98,623 shares redeemed for $0.6 million (approximately $5.16 per share).  All redemptions were funded with cash on hand.

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, our board of directors redeemed all ten Exceptional Redemption requests received that complied with the applicable requirements and guidelines of the share redemption program for an aggregate of 12,496 shares redeemed for approximately $0.1 million (approximately $5.83 per share).  All redemptions were funded with cash on hand.

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, we redeemed shares as follows (including both Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions):

On August 9, 2017, our board of directors adopted a Fourth Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (the “Amended Share Redemption Program”) to be effective July 1, 2018. The material changes to the program are as follows. We will no longer process redemptions upon death, “qualifying disability,” or confinement to a long-term care facility on terms different than those on which we process all other redemptions. The price at which we will redeem shares submitted for redemption will be a percentage of the estimated NAV per Share as of the Effective Date (as defined in the Amended Share Redemption Program), as follows:

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data.

As of December 31, 2017, we had eight real estate investments, seven of which were consolidated and one real estate investment which we account for under the equity method. One of our consolidated properties is wholly owned and six properties are consolidated through investments in joint ventures. During 2017, we sold our one hotel property, the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. The following data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7.

The following table reflects a rollforward of the number of real estate investments we had beginning January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2017:

The selected data below has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.

Executive Overview

We were formed primarily to acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets on an opportunistic and value-add basis.  In particular, we have focused generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who were distressed or faced time-sensitive deadlines.  In addition, our opportunistic and value-add investment strategy has included investments in real estate-related assets that present opportunities for higher current income. Since inception, we have acquired a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, and multifamily. We have purchased existing, income-producing properties and newly constructed properties. We have also invested in mortgage and mezzanine loans. We have made our investments in or in respect of real estate assets located in the United States and other countries based on our view of existing market conditions. Currently, our investments include multifamily and student housing communities and an office building. All of our current investments are located in the United States. We currently intend to hold our various real properties until such time as our board of directors determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that the objectives will not be met.

Market Outlook

During 2017, the health of the U.S. economy continued to steadily improve. The U.S. real gross domestic product, or GDP, grew at a solid rate of 2.3% during 2017 compared to 1.9% during 2016. The U.S. Federal Reserve is currently projecting a 2.5% median increase in GDP for 2018. Consumer confidence has grown stronger primarily as a result of the improving labor market, as evidenced by a historically low unemployment level, and relative stability in fuel prices. During 2017, the unemployment rate decreased to 4.1% as of the end of the year compared to 4.7% as of the end of 2016 and the labor market is expected to continue to remain strong throughout 2018. The strengthening of the labor market along with a solid rate of economic growth and low inflation were contributing factors leading to the U.S. Federal Reserve raising the federal funds rate three times throughout 2017. The federal funds rate, which helps determine rates for mortgages, credit cards and other borrowing, is currently hovering in a range of 1.25% to 1.5%, and overall, rates are still at historically low levels. The U.S. Federal Reserve has indicated it currently plans to continue to raise rates throughout 2018 and 2019.

As of December 31, 2017, we were invested in four multifamily properties, including the Flats at Fishers which we acquired on November 30, 2017.  For the year ended December 31, 2017, excluding assets sold during the year, 55% of our total revenues were derived from our multifamily properties. The multifamily sector has continued to see strong rent growth and had an average national rental growth rate of 2.58% in 2017 and ended the year with the national vacancy rate of 4.8% compared to 4.1% at the end of 2016. The increase in the national vacancy rate was principally attributable to new supply delivered to the marketplace as developers recognized the higher propensity to rent evidenced by the fact that according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the percentage of renters in the country is now around 36%. Despite the increased supply, nationwide average rental rates are still expected to continue to rise during 2018. Additionally, rising construction costs and higher interest rates for construction lending are expected to slow the pace of the number of new units delivered to the marketplace.

As of December 31, 2017, a portion of our portfolio was invested in three public university student housing complexes, including two complexes located near the University of Georgia and one complex located adjacent to the University of Akron. Unlike traditional multifamily housing, most leases at a student housing property typically begin and end on the same dates, which for our student housing leases, typically coincide with the commencement of the fall academic term and terminating at the completion of the last summer school session of the academic year.  As such, we must re-lease each property in its entirety each year during a highly compressed time period, resulting in significant turnover in our tenant population from year to year.  As a result, we are highly dependent upon the effectiveness of our marketing and leasing efforts during the short annual leasing season that generally begins in January and ends in August of each year.  Our properties’ occupancy rates are, therefore, relatively stable during the August to July academic year, but are susceptible to fluctuation at the commencement of each new academic year, which may be greater than the fluctuation in occupancy rates experienced by traditional multifamily properties.  Although college enrollment is down nationwide, demand for student housing remains strong at the major universities. Many universities continue to face challenges, including lower enrollment and increased tuition costs. These challenges may lead to a decrease in occupancy and lower than anticipated revenues at our student housing properties.

Although the current outlook on financing trends appears relatively stable and interest rates are still at historically low levels, there are risks.  It is expected that the U.S. Federal Reserve will continue to increase interest rates during 2018, the timing and amount of the rate increases as well government spending levels and global economic concerns generally affects the overall level of domestic economic growth.  Any of these issues could slow economic growth, which could affect the amount of capital available or the costs charged for financings.  As of December 31, 2017, our weighted average interest rate was 4.97%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had cash and cash equivalents of $52.1 million as of December 31, 2017. Our principal demands for funds going forward will be for the payment of (a) operating expenses, (b) interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness, (c) selective acquisitions and (d) distributions (if authorized by our board of directors). Generally, we expect to meet cash needs for the payment of operating expenses and interest on our outstanding indebtedness from our cash flow from operations and to fund distributions (if any) from our excess cash flow and/or proceeds from asset sales. To the extent that our cash flow from operations is not sufficient to cover our operating expenses, interest on our outstanding indebtedness, or redemptions, we expect to use borrowings and asset sales to fund such needs.

We intend to hold our various real properties until such time as our board of directors determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that the objectives will not be met. We sold the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel in the third quarter of 2017 and Lakewood Flats in the third quarter of 2016. Additionally, we received proceeds of approximately $21.6 million related to equity method investment in Prospect Park in the fourth quarter of 2017.

We did not make any distributions during 2017. On January 5, 2016, we paid a special cash distribution, which was declared in 2015, of $38.4 million, or $1.50 per share of common stock. On March 31, 2015, we paid a special cash distribution of $25.7 million, or $1.00 per share of common stock. Both the 2016 and 2015 special cash distributions were funded with proceeds from asset sales completed in 2015.

We continually evaluate our liquidity and ability to fund future operations and debt obligations.  In addition to our 22 Exchange loan (see “Debt Compliance” for additional information), as of March 16, 2018, the Company had aggregate balloon payments of approximately $56.6 million associated with (i) River Club and the Townhomes of River Club ($23.4 million due at maturity date of May 1, 2018), (ii) Parkside ($9.6 million due at maturity date of June 1, 2018) and (iii) Arbors Harbor Town ($23.6 million due at maturity date of January 1, 2019) maturing over the next twelve months. We currently expect to refinance all or a portion of the maturing indebtedness on or before its applicable scheduled maturity. However, if we are unable to refinance the outstanding indebtedness at favorable terms, we will look to repay the outstanding balance with available cash and/or proceeds from selective asset sales. In addition to our debt obligations, we consider other factors in evaluating our liquidity. For example, to the extent our portfolio is concentrated in certain geographic regions and types of assets, downturns relating generally to such regions and assets may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a number of our properties within a short time period.  Such defaults could negatively affect our liquidity and adversely affect our ability to fund our ongoing operations. For the year ended December 31, 2017, excluding the investment we sold in 2017, 28.1%, 13.9%, 21.3%, 13.1%, 22.6% and 1.0% of our total revenues (including revenues generated from tenant reimbursements) were derived from our properties located in Florida, Texas, Tennessee, Ohio, Georgia and Indiana, respectively. Additionally, excluding our property sold in 2017, 54.7%, 35.7% and 9.6% of our total revenues were from our multifamily properties, student housing properties and medical office building, respectively.

We may, but are not required to, establish capital reserves from cash flow generated by operating properties and other investments, or net sales proceeds from the sale of our properties and other investments.  Capital reserves are typically utilized for non-operating expenses such as tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and major capital expenditures.  Alternatively, a lender may establish its own criteria for escrow of capital reserves.

We have borrowed money to acquire properties and make other investments.  Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness is limited to 300% of our “net assets” (as defined by our charter) as of the date of any borrowing; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors.  In addition to our charter limitation, our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests.  Our policy limitation, however, does not apply to individual real estate assets.

Commercial real estate debt markets may experience volatility and uncertainty as a result of certain related factors, including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies, macro-economic issues related to fiscal, tax and regulatory policies, and global financial issues.  Should the overall cost of borrowings increase, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, we will need to factor such increases into the economics of our developments and investments.  This may result in our investment operations generating lower overall economic returns and a reduced level of cash flow, which could potentially impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.  In addition, disruptions in the debt markets may reduce the amount of capital that is available to finance real estate, which in turn could: (i) lead to a decline in real estate values generally; (ii) slow real estate transaction activity; (iii) reduce the loan to value ratio upon which lenders are willing to extend debt; and (iv) result in difficulty in refinancing debt as it becomes due, all of which may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact on the value of real estate investments and the revenues, income or cash flow from the operations of real properties and mortgage loans.

Debt Financings

From time to time, we have obtained mortgage, bridge, or mezzanine loans for acquisitions and investments, as well as property development.  In the future, we may obtain financing for property development or to refinance our existing real estate assets, depending on multiple factors.

As of December 31, 2017, our notes payable balance was $89.9 million, net of deferred financing fees of $0.4 million, and had a weighted average interest rate of 4.97%. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had notes payable of $142.3 million, net of deferred financing fees of $0.8 million, with a weighted average interest rate of 3.9%. We have guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the unaffiliated lenders with respect to 22 Exchange, and Parkside notes payable.

2017 Debt Transactions

Our debt secured by Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, with an outstanding balance of $38.0 million as of December 31, 2016, was scheduled to mature on May 9, 2017. On May 8, 2017, we, through our 80% ownership interest in a joint venture between our indirect wholly owned subsidiary and JMI Realty, LLC, an unaffiliated third party (the “Kauai Joint Venture”), entered into a new mortgage facility of up to $44.0 million (the “Courtyard Kauai Loan”) with TH Commercial Investment Corp. Initial borrowings of $36.0 million were advanced under the Courtyard Kauai Loan and those funds plus additional cash were used to repay the then outstanding balance under the previous loan with Wells Fargo Bank. The Courtyard Kauai Loan bore interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 4.7% and was scheduled to mature in three years with two one-year extensions available. We had also guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carve-outs as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the lender.   

On August 15, 2017, the Courtyard Kauai Loan was assumed by the unrelated third-party buyer in connection with the sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. The outstanding balance as of the date of sale was $36.0 million. See Notes 6 and 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

On December 27, 2017, we used cash on hand to pay off in full the existing indebtedness of approximately $12.5 million on the Gardens Medical Pavilion, which was scheduled to mature on January 1, 2018.

Debt Compliance

Our loan agreements stipulate that we comply with certain reporting and financial covenants.  These covenants include, among other things, maintaining minimum debt service coverage ratios, loan to value ratios, and liquidity.  We are currently in compliance with all of our debt covenants other than the debt associated with 22 Exchange (outstanding balance of approximately $19.0 million as of December 31, 2017) as discussed below.

We did not meet the debt service coverage requirements for our 22 Exchange loan as of March 31, 2017, June 30, 2017, September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017. As a result, the lender elected to sweep the cash from operations beginning in January 2018. Additionally, the cash from operations was not sufficient to fully pay the scheduled monthly debt service due on January 5, 2018, which constituted an event of default and therefore, the 22 Exchange loan which was scheduled to mature in May 2023 is now due on demand. We received notice on January 9, 2018 that the 22 Exchange loan had been transferred to a special servicer effective immediately. Subsequently, the special servicer placed the property in receivership and commenced foreclosure proceedings. However, we believe the loss of cash flow and the expected loss of this property will not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

Contractual Obligations

One of our principal short-term and long-term liquidity requirements includes the repayment of maturing debt. The following table provides information with respect to the contractual maturities and scheduled principal repayments of our indebtedness as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

The table amounts reflect the 22 Exchange loan as due on demand. However, the table amounts do not reflect the effect of any available extension options.

In addition to the 22 Exchange loan, as of December 31, 2017, the Company had debt of approximately $23.5 million associated with River Club and the Townhomes at River Club, and $9.7 million associated with Parkside maturing in the next twelve months. If we do not dispose of River Club and the Townhomes at River Club or Parkside by their maturity dates, we expect to repay these outstanding balances with available cash or refinance all or a portion of the balances outstanding.

Results of Operations

As of December 31, 2017, we had eight real estate investments, seven of which were consolidated (one wholly owned property and six properties consolidated through investments in joint ventures) and one real estate investment which we account for under the equity method. We sold one property (Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel) on August 15, 2017 and acquired one property (Flats at Fishers) on November 30, 2017. The disposition of this property did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since it did not represent a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operating results of this property are reflected in the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented through its date of disposition. Additionally, on December 15, 2017 we received proceeds of approximately $21.6 million related to our equity method investment in Prospect Park.

As of December 31, 2016, we had eight real estate investments, seven of which were consolidated (seven properties consolidated through investments in joint ventures) and one real estate investment which we account for under the equity method. We sold one property (Lakewood Flats) on August 16, 2016. The disposition of this property did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since it did not represent a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operating results of this property are reflected in the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented through its date of disposition.

As of December 31, 2015, we had nine real estate investments, eight of which were consolidated (one wholly owned property and seven properties consolidated through investments in joint ventures) and one real estate investment which we account for under the equity method of accounting. We sold Babcock, AJS, Holstenplatz, and Wimberly during 2015. These disposed properties did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since they did not represent a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operating results of these disposed properties are reflected in the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented through their respective dates of disposition.

Year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016

Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 reflect our acquisition and disposition activities during such periods. Properties which were owned by us during the entire periods presented are referred to as our “Same Store” properties.

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):

The following table reflects total rental and hotel revenues and total property and hotel operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 for our (i) Same Store properties, (ii) acquisitions and (iii) dispositions (dollars in thousands):

The tables below reflect occupancy and effective monthly rental rates for our Same Store properties:

Revenues.    Rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $24.3 million, a decrease of $3.3 million, compared to $27.6 million for the same period 2016. Excluding the effect of our acquisition and disposition activities during the periods, our rental revenues increased by $0.6 million for our Same Store properties.

Hotel revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $13.2 million, a decrease of $5.3 million, compared to $18.5 million for the same period in 2016. Our hotel revenues were attributable solely to the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel which was sold on August 15, 2017.

Property Operating Expenses.    Property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $8.9 million, a decrease of $0.6 million, compared to $9.5 million for the same period in 2016. Excluding the effect of our acquisition and disposition activities during the periods, our property operating expenses increased by $0.2 million for our Same Store properties.

Hotel Operating Expenses.  Hotel operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $9.3 million, a decrease of $4.3 million, compared to $13.6 million for the same period in 2016.  Our hotel operating expenses were attributable solely to the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel which was sold on August 15, 2017.

Interest Expense, Net.   Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $6.1 million, a decrease of $0.1 million, compared to $6.2 million for the same period in 2016.  Excluding the effect of our acquisition and disposition activities during the periods, our interest expense, net increased by $0.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we capitalized interest of approximately $0.1 million in connection with our equity method investment in Prospect Park.

Real Estate Taxes.  Real estate taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $4.3 million, a decrease of $0.8 million, compared to $5.1 million for the same period in 2016. Excluding the effect of our acquisitions and dispositions activity during the periods, our real estate taxes increased by $0.3 million for our Same Store Properties.

Impairment Charge. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $4.1 million on our investment in 22 Exchange (see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. During the year ended December 31, 2016 we did not record any impairment charges.

Property Management Fees.   Property management fees, which are based on revenues, were $1.3 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and were composed of property management fees paid to unaffiliated third parties and our affiliated property manager.

Asset Management Fees.   Asset management fees for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $1.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively, and were composed of asset management fees paid to our external advisor and third parties with respect to our investments. We pay our external advisor or its affiliates a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 0.7% of the value for each asset as determined in connection with our establishment and publication of an estimated NAV per Share. Asset management fees for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 include fees related to our disposed properties. We incurred $0.2 million and $0.3 million in asset management fees related to disposed properties during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

General and Administrative Expenses.   General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $4.5 million and $3.1 million, respectively, and were composed of audit fees, legal fees, board of directors’ fees, and other administrative expenses.  The increase of approximately $1.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to acquisition fees and an increase in professional fees.

Depreciation and Amortization.   Depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $9.6 million and $11.0 million, respectively.  Excluding the effect of our acquisitions and dispositions activity during the periods, our depreciation and amortization decreased by $0.1 million for our Same Store Properties.

Income from Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded equity earnings of $17.9 million related to our unconsolidated investment in Prospect Park. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded no equity earnings related to our unconsolidated investment in Prospect Park. See Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. We recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 in connection with the disposition of Lakewood Flats on August 16, 2016. The $0.5 million loss consisted of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.4 million and an early termination fee of $0.1 million.

Gain on Sale of Real Estate. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $20.9 million in connection with our disposition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. Additionally, during 2017 we recognized an aggregate gain of $0.7 million related to certain escrow reimbursements from an outstanding insurance claim for Lakewood Flats. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $11.5 million and a deferred gain of approximately $1.2 million in connection with our disposition of Lakewood Flats. The deferred gain related to an outstanding insurance claim on Lakewood Flats. Additionally, during 2016 we recorded a $0.1 million loss related to the final settlement of certain fees associated with our 2015 disposition of AJS.

Income Tax Benefit. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded an aggregate income tax benefit of approximately $1.6 million consisting of (i) a refund of foreign income tax of approximately $0.8 million and (ii) the reversal of our previously estimated taxes payable $0.8 million related to the sales of AJS and Holstenplatz. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded an income tax benefit of less than $0.1 million representing the difference in the actual taxes due and the originally estimated taxes payable on the sale of Holstenplatz. 

Year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015

Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 reflect our disposition activities during such periods. Properties which were owned by us during the entire periods presented are referred to as our “Same Store” properties.

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):

The following table reflects rental revenues and property operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 for (i) our Same Store properties; and (ii) our disposition of Lakewood Flats on August 16, 2016 and our 2015 dispositions of Babcock, AJS, Holstenplatz, and Wimberly (dollars in thousands):

The tables below reflect occupancy and effective monthly rental rates for our Same Store properties and occupancy and average daily rate (“ADR”) for the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel:

Revenues.    Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $46.1 million, a decrease of $4.1 million, compared to $50.2 million for the same period in 2015. Excluding the effect of our dispositions during the periods, rental revenues (including our hotel revenues) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $42.0 million and $39.9 million, respectively. Rental revenues from Babcock, AJS, Holstenplatz, and Wimberly, which were disposed of in 2015 and Lakewood Flats, which was disposed of in 2016, were $4.1 million and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The change in revenues is primarily due to:

Property Operating Expenses.    Property operating expenses for the year end December 31, 2016 were $9.5 million, a decrease of $2.0 million, compared to $11.5 million for the same period in 2015. Excluding the effect of our dispositions during the periods, property operating expenses increased by less than $0.1 million for our Same Store properties.

Hotel Operating Expenses.  Hotel operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $13.6 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, compared to $12.5 million for the same period in 2015.  The increase in hotel operating expenses was primarily due to an aggregate increase of $0.9 million in food and beverage costs and sales and marketing costs incurred during 2016 for the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel.

Interest Expense, Net.   Interest expense, net for the years ended December 31, 2016 was $6.2 million, a decrease of $0.6 million, compared to $6.8 million for the same period in 2015.  Excluding the effect of our dispositions during the periods, interest expense, net increased by $0.3 million for our Same Store properties. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we capitalized interest of approximately $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in connection with our equity method investment in Prospect Park.

Real Estate Taxes.  Real estate taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $5.1 million, a decrease of $1.0 million, compared to $6.1 million for the same period in 2015. Excluding the effect of our dispositions during the periods, real estate taxes increased by less than $0.1 million for our Same Store properties.

Impairment Charge. During the year ended December 31, 2016 we did not record any impairment charges. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $1.4 million on our investment in 22 Exchange (see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).

Property Management Fees.   Property management fees, which are based on revenues, were $1.5 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and were composed of property management fees paid to unaffiliated third parties and our affiliated property manager.

Asset Management Fees.   Asset management fees for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $2.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively, and were composed of asset management fees paid to the Behringer Advisor and third parties with respect to our investments. We pay our external advisor or its affiliates a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 0.7% of the value for each asset as determined in connection with our establishment and publication of a NAV per Share. Asset management fees for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 include fees related to our disposed properties. We expensed $0.3 million and $0.7 million in asset management fees related to disposed properties during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

General and Administrative Expenses.   General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $3.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, and were composed of audit fees, legal fees, board of directors’ fees, and other administrative expenses.  The decrease of approximately $0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to decreases of $0.3 million and $0.2 million in administrative service fees payable to the external advisor and legal fees, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization.   Depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $11.0 million and $14.9 million, respectively.  Excluding the effect of our dispositions during the periods, our depreciations and amortization increased by $0.4 million for our Same Store properties.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. We recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 in connection with the disposition of Lakewood Flats on August 16, 2016. The $0.5 million loss consisted of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.4 million and an early termination fee of $0.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded losses on early extinguishment of debt totaling $0.7 million in connection with the payoff of debt secured by three investments we sold. The aggregate charge of $0.7 million was comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.3 million and early termination fees of $0.4 million.