Annual Statements Open main menu

LIMESTONE BANCORP, INC. - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2013

Or

 

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                    

Commission file number: 001-33033

 

 

PORTER BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Kentucky   61-1142247

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

2500 Eastpoint Parkway, Louisville, Kentucky   40223
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(502) 499-4800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes   x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

 

¨

  

Accelerated filer

 

¨

Non-accelerated filer

 

¨

  

Smaller reporting company

 

x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

12,301,084 shares of Common Stock, no par value, were outstanding at July 31, 2013.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

INDEX

 

         Page  

PART I –

 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

ITEM 1.

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     1   

ITEM 2.

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     36   

ITEM 3.

 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     54   

ITEM 4.

 

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     54   

PART II –

 

OTHER INFORMATION

  

ITEM 1.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     55   

ITEM 1A.

 

RISK FACTORS

     55   

ITEM 2.

 

UNREGISTERED SALES ON EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

     55   

ITEM 3.

 

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

     55   

ITEM 4.

 

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

     55   

ITEM 5.

 

OTHER INFORMATION

     55   

ITEM 6.

 

EXHIBITS

     55   


Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements of Porter Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary, PBI Bank, Inc. are submitted:

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets for June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and

2012

Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2013

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

 

1


Table of Contents

PORTER BANCORP, INC.

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands except share data)

 

     June 30,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Assets

    

Cash and due from financial institutions

   $ 61,949      $ 46,512   

Federal funds sold

     2,317        3,060   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

     64,266        49,572   

Securities available for sale

     176,942        178,476   

Mortgage loans held for sale

     133        507   

Loans, net of allowance of $37,559 and $56,680, respectively

     737,226        842,412   

Premises and equipment

     20,368        20,805   

Other real estate owned

     47,030        43,671   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     10,072        10,072   

Bank owned life insurance

     8,772        8,398   

Accrued interest receivable and other assets

     7,322        8,718   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 1,072,131      $ 1,162,631   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

    

Deposits

    

Non-interest bearing

   $ 106,320      $ 114,310   

Interest bearing

     874,516        950,749   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

     980,836        1,065,059   

Repurchase agreements

     3,292        2,634   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     5,016        5,604   

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

     12,710        10,169   

Subordinated capital note

     6,525        6,975   

Junior subordinated debentures

     25,000        25,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     1,033,379        1,115,441   

Stockholders’ equity

    

Preferred stock, no par, 1,000,000 shares authorized,

    

Series A – 35,000 issued and outstanding; Liquidation preference of $35.0 million at June 30, 2013

     34,930        34,840   

Series C – 317,042 issued and outstanding; Liquidation preference of $3.6 million at June 30, 2013

     3,283        3,283   

Common stock, no par, 86,000,000 shares authorized, 12,322,207 and 12,002,421 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

     112,236        112,236   

Additional paid-in capital

     20,509        20,283   

Retained deficit

     (128,860     (126,517

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     (3,346     3,065   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     38,752        47,190   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 1,072,131      $ 1,162,631   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

PORTER BANCORP, INC.

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2012     2013     2012  

Interest income

        

Loans, including fees

   $ 9,954      $ 13,689      $ 19,987      $ 28,201   

Taxable securities

     848        797        1,715        1,638   

Tax exempt securities

     231        196        452        446   

Fed funds sold and other

     135        130        272        282   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     11,168        14,812        22,426        30,567   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense

        

Deposits

     2,560        3,726        5,264        7,726   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     41        54        84        111   

Subordinated capital note

     56        67        114        138   

Junior subordinated debentures

     157        168        311        339   

Federal funds purchased and other

     2        2        3        4   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     2,816        4,017        5,776        8,318   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

     8,352        10,795        16,650        22,249   

Provision for loan losses

     —          4,000        450        7,750   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     8,352        6,795        16,200        14,499   

Non-interest income

        

Service charges on deposit accounts

     506        556        999        1,110   

Income from fiduciary activities

     —          291        517        542   

Bank card interchange fees

     196        199        368        376   

Other real estate owned rental income

     230        24        342        62   

Net gain on sales of securities

     703        1,511        703        3,530   

Income from bank owned life insurance

     305        79        384        158   

Other

     208        358        482        685   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     2,148        3,018        3,795        6,463   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-interest expense

        

Salaries and employee benefits

     3,999        3,982        8,138        8,294   

Occupancy and equipment

     913        969        1,844        1,855   

Loan collection expense

     2,407        586        3,442        946   

Other real estate owned expense

     1,657        1,205        2,448        2,462   

FDIC Insurance

     650        832        1,289        1,705   

State franchise tax

     537        592        1,074        1,184   

Professional fees

     499        567        905        923   

Communications

     179        168        354        348   

Insurance expense

     160        104        311        200   

Postage and delivery

     102        109        215        231   

Other

     706        548        1,353        1,161   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     11,809        9,662        21,373        19,309   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     (1,309     151        (1,378     1,653   

Income tax benefit

     —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

     (1,309     151        (1,378     1,653   

Less:

        

Dividends on preferred stock

     437        438        875        875   

Accretion on Series A preferred stock

     45        45        90        90   

Earnings (losses) allocated to participating securities

     (110     (13     (131     27   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

   $ (1,681   $ (319   $ (2,212   $ 661   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

   $ (0.14   $ (0.03   $ (0.19   $ 0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

   $ (0.14   $ (0.03   $ (0.19   $ 0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

PORTER BANCORP, INC.

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands)

 

     Three Months Ended
June  30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2012     2013     2012  

Net income (loss)

   $ (1,309   $ 151      $ (1,378   $ 1,653   

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

        

Unrealized gain (loss) on securities:

        

Unrealized gain (loss) arising during the period

     (9,086     (195 )     (9,160     427   

Reclassification of amount realized through sales

     (703     (1,511 )     (703     (3,530 )
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Included in net loss

     (9,789     (1,706     (9,863     (3,103

Tax effect

     3,426        597        3,452        1,086   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net of tax

     (6,363     (1,109 )     (6,411     (2,017 )
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (7,672   $ (958   $ (7,789   $ (364
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

PORTER BANCORP, INC.

Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

           Accumulated        
     Shares      Amount      Additional            Other        
           Series A      Series C             Series A      Series C      Paid-In      Retained     Comprehensive        
     Common     Preferred      Preferred      Common      Preferred      Preferred      Capital      Deficit     Income     Total  

Balances, January 1, 2013

     12,002,421        35,000         317,042       $ 112,236       $ 34,840       $ 3,283       $ 20,283       $ (126,517   $ 3,065      $ 47,190   

Issuance of unvested stock

     325,018        —           —           —           —           —           —           —          —          —     

Forfeited unvested stock

     (5,232     —           —           —           —           —           —           —          —          —     

Stock-based compensation expense

     —          —           —           —           —           —           226         —          —          226   

Net loss

     —          —           —           —           —           —           —           (1,378     —          (1,378

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes

     —          —           —           —           —           —           —           —          (6,411     (6,411

Dividends 5% on Series A preferred stock

     —          —           —           —           —           —           —           (875     —          (875

Accretion of Series A preferred stock discount

     —          —           —           —           90         —           —           (90     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balances, June 30, 2013

     12,322,207        35,000         317,042       $ 112,236       $ 34,930       $ 3,283       $ 20,509       $ (128,860   $ (3,346   $ 38,752   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

PORTER BANCORP, INC.

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

(dollars in thousands)

 

     2013     2012  

Cash flows from operating activities

    

Net income (loss)

   $ (1,378   $ 1,653   

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities

    

Depreciation and amortization

     1,042        1,127   

Provision for loan losses

     450        7,750   

Net amortization on securities

     1,185        1,566   

Stock-based compensation expense

     226        215   

Net gain on loans originated for sale

     (66     (122

Loans originated for sale

     (2,095     (5,721

Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale

     2,524        6,133   

Net gain on sales of investment securities

     (703     (3,530

Net loss on sales of other real estate owned

     359        948   

Net write-down of other real estate owned

     1,284        830   

Earnings on bank owned life insurance

     (374     (148

Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets

     1,095        4,282   

Net change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities

     1,666        (977
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash from operating activities

     5,215        14,006   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

    

Purchases of available-for-sale securities

     (24,929     (121,854

Sales and calls of available-for-sale securities

     1,908        65,695   

Maturities and prepayments of available-for-sale securities

     17,661        20,848   

Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned

     10,538        13,072   

Improvements to other real estate owned

     —          (1

Loan originations and payments, net

     89,045        58,397   

Purchases of premises and equipment, net

     (141     (318
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash from investing activities

     94,082        35,839   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

    

Net change in deposits

     (84,223     (119,041

Net change in repurchase agreements

     658        763   

Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     (588     (718

Repayment of subordinated capital note

     (450     (450
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash from financing activities

     (84,603     (119,446
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

     14,694        (69,601

Beginning cash and cash equivalents

     49,572        105,962   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending cash and cash equivalents

   $ 64,266      $ 36,361   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

    

Interest paid

   $ 5,603      $ 8,159   

Income taxes paid (refunded)

     —          (2,000

Supplemental non-cash disclosure:

    

Transfer from loans to other real estate

   $ 15,555      $ 28,126   

Financed sales of other real estate owned

     15        361   

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

PORTER BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation – The consolidated financial statements include Porter Bancorp, Inc. (Company or PBI) and its subsidiary, PBI Bank (Bank). The Company owns a 100% interest in the Bank. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. A description of other significant accounting policies is presented in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Use of Estimates – To prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, fair values of financial instruments, stock compensation, deferred tax assets, other intangibles, and fair values of other real estate owned are particularly subject to change.

Reclassifications – Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The reclassifications did not impact net income or stockholders’ equity.

Note 2 – Going Concern Considerations and Future Plans

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. However, the events and circumstances described in this Note raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

During the first six months of 2013, we reported net loss to common shareholders of $2.2 million, compared with net income to common shareholders of $661,000 for the first six months of 2012. This was primarily due to decreased net interest income driven by the reduction of the size of our loan portfolio and a decline in our net interest margin, a reduction of $2.8 million in gains on sales of investment securities, an increase in our loan collection expense and continuing costs to carry higher levels of nonperforming assets. This was offset by a decrease in the provision for loan losses expense from $7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, to $450,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we reported net loss to common shareholders of $33.4 million. This loss was attributable primarily to $40.3 million of provision for loan losses expense. A decline in credit quality in our portfolio during the year resulted in net charge-offs of $36.1 million, and OREO expense of $10.5 million resulting from fair value write-downs driven by new appraisals and reduced marketing prices, net loss on sales, and ongoing operating expense. We also had lower net interest margin due to lower average loans outstanding, loans re-pricing at lower rates, and the level of non-performing loans in our portfolio. Net loss to common shareholders of $33.4 million, for the year ended December 31, 2012, compares with net loss to common shareholders of $105.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we began deferring the payment of regular quarterly cash dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury. At June 30, 2013, cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends on this stock totaled $3.3 million. We have deferred dividend payments for six quarters and the holder of our Series A Preferred Stock (currently the U.S. Treasury) has the right to appoint up to two representatives to our Board of Directors. We continue to accrue deferred dividends, which are deducted from income to common shareholders for financial statement purposes.

In June 2011, the Bank agreed to a Consent Order with the FDIC and KDFI in which the Bank agreed, among other things, to improve asset quality, reduce loan concentrations, and maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9% and a minimum total risk based capital ratio of 12%. The Consent Order was included in our Current Report on 8-K filed on June 30, 2011. In October 2012, the Bank entered into a new Consent Order with the FDIC and KDFI again agreeing to maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9% and a minimum total risk based capital ratio of 12%. The Bank also agreed that if it should be unable to reach the required capital levels, and if directed in writing by the FDIC, then the Bank would within 30 days develop, adopt and implement a written plan to sell or merge itself into another federally insured financial institution or otherwise immediately obtain a sufficient capital investment into the Bank to fully meet the capital requirements.

 

7


Table of Contents

We expect to continue to work with our regulators toward capital ratio compliance as outlined in the written capital plan previously submitted by the Bank. The new Consent Order also requires the Bank to continue to adhere to the plans implemented in response to the June 2011 Consent Order, and includes the substantive provisions of the June 2011 Consent Order. The new Consent Order was included in our Current Report on 8-K filed on September 19, 2012. As of June 30, 2013, the capital ratios required by the Consent Order were not met.

In order to meet these capital requirements, the Board of Directors and management are continuing to evaluate strategies to achieve the following objectives:

 

 

 

Increasing capital through a possible public offering or private placement of common stock to new and existing shareholders. We have engaged a financial advisor to assist our Board in evaluating our options for increasing capital and redeeming our Series A preferred stock issued to the US Treasury in 2008 under the Capital Purchase Program.

 

 

 

Continuing to operate the Company and Bank in a safe and sound manner. This strategy will require us to continue to reduce the size of our balance sheet, reduce our lending concentrations, consider selling loans, and reduce other noninterest expense through the disposition of OREO.

 

 

 

Continuing with succession planning and adding resources to the management team. John T. Taylor was named President and CEO for PBI Bank and appointed to the Board of Directors in July 2012. Effective July 31, 2013, Maria L. Bouvette retired as the Company’s Chairman of the Board and CEO, and as Chairman of the Board of PBI Bank. W. Glenn Hogan is expected to be elected Chairman of the Board of the Company following regulatory approval. John T. Taylor will be named CEO of the Company, following regulatory approval. Additionally, John R. Davis was appointed Chief Credit Officer of PBI Bank in August 2012, with responsibility for establishing and executing the credit quality policies and overseeing credit administration for the organization.

 

 

 

Evaluating our internal processes and procedures, distribution of labor, and work-flow to ensure we have adequately and appropriately deployed resources in an efficient manner in the current environment. To this end, we believe the opportunity exists to centralize key processes that will lead to improved execution and cost savings.

 

 

 

Executing on our commitment to improve credit quality and reduce loan concentrations and balance sheet risk.

 

 

 

We have reduced the size of our loan portfolio significantly from $1.3 billion at December 31, 2010, to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2011, to $899.1 million at December 31, 2012, and $774.8 million at June 30, 2013. We have significantly improved our staffing in the commercial lending area which is now led by Joe C. Seiler.

 

 

 

Our Consent Order calls for us to reduce our construction and development loans to not more than 75% of total risk-based capital. We are now in compliance with construction and development loans totaling $58.0 million, or 70% of total risk-based capital, at June 30, 2013, down from $70.3 million, or 82% of total risk-based capital, at December 31, 2012.

 

 

 

Our Consent Order also requires us to reduce non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, construction and development loans, and multi-family residential real estate loans as a group, to not more than 250% of total risk-based capital. While we have made significant improvements over the last year, we were not in compliance with this concentration limit at June 30, 2013. These loans totaled $270.8 million, or 325% of total risk-based capital, at June 30, 2013 and $311.1 million, or 362% of total risk-based capital, at December 31, 2012.

 

 

 

We are working to reduce our loan concentrations by curtailing new construction and development lending and new non-owner occupied commercial real estate lending. We are also receiving principal reductions from amortizing credits and pay-downs from our customers who sell properties built for resale. We have reduced the construction loan portfolio from $199.5 million at December 31, 2010 to $58.0 million at June 30, 2013. Our non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans declined from $293.3 million at December 31, 2010 to $165.6 million at June 30, 2013.

 

 

 

Executing on our commitment to sell other real estate owned and reinvest in quality income producing assets.

 

 

 

The remediation process for loans secured by real estate has led the Bank to acquire significant levels of OREO in 2012, 2011, and 2010. This trend has continued at a slower pace in 2013. The Bank acquired $33.5 million, $41.9 million, and $90.8 million during 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. For the first six months of 2013, we acquired $15.6 million of OREO.

 

8


Table of Contents
 

 

We have incurred significant losses in disposing of this real estate. We incurred losses totaling $9.3 million, $42.8 million, and $13.9 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, from sales at less than carrying values and fair value write-downs attributable to declines in appraisal valuations and changes in our pricing strategies. During the six month period ended June 30, 2013, we incurred OREO losses totaling $1.6 million, which consisted of $359,000 in loss on sale and $1.3 million from declining values as evidenced by new appraisals and reduced marketing prices in connection with our sales strategies.

 

 

 

To ensure that we maximize the value we receive upon the sale of OREO, we continually evaluate sales opportunities and channels. We are targeting multiple sales opportunities and channels through internal marketing and the use of brokers, auctions, technology sales platforms, and bulk sale strategies. Proceeds from the sale of OREO totaled $10.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $22.5 million, $26.0 million and $25.0 million during 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

 

 

 

At December 31, 2012, the OREO portfolio consisted of 51% construction, development, and land assets. At June 30, 2013 this concentration had declined to 43%. This is consistent with our reduction of construction, development and other land loans, which have declined to $58.0 million at June 30, 2013 compared to $70.3 million at December 31, 2012. Over the past six months, the composition of our OREO portfolio has shifted toward commercial real estate and 1-4 family residential properties, which we have found to be more liquid than construction, development, and land assets. Commercial real estate represents 39% of the portfolio at June 30, 2013 compared with 35% at December 31, 2012. 1-4 family residential properties represent 15% of the portfolio at June 30, 2013 compared with 12% at December 31, 2012.

 

 

 

Evaluating other strategic alternatives, such as the sale of assets or branches.

Bank regulatory agencies can exercise discretion when an institution does not meet the terms of a consent order. Based on individual circumstances, the agencies may issue mandatory directives, impose monetary penalties, initiate changes in management, or take more serious adverse actions.

 

9


Table of Contents

Note 3 – Securities

The fair value of available for sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

 

     Amortized
Cost
     Gross
Unrealized
Gains
     Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
 
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013:

          

U.S. Government and federal agency

   $ 26,604       $ 358       $ (659   $ 26,303   

Agency mortgage-backed: residential

     71,740         454         (1,625     70,569   

State and municipal

     55,835         974         (1,510     55,299   

Corporate bonds

     23,086         937         (160     23,863   

Other

     572         59         —          631   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt securities

     177,837         2,782         (3,954     176,665   

Equity

     209         68         —          277   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 178,046       $ 2,850       $ (3,954   $ 176,942   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2012:

          

U.S. Government and federal agency

   $ 5,603       $ 530       $ —        $ 6,133   

Agency mortgage-backed: residential

     94,298         1,141         (257     95,182   

State and municipal

     52,485         2,335         (87     54,733   

Corporate bonds

     18,851         1,150         (37     19,964   

Other

     572         46         —          618   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt securities

     171,809         5,202         (381     176,630   

Equity

     1,359         487         —          1,846   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 173,168       $ 5,689       $ (381   $ 178,476   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sales and calls of available for sale securities were as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013      2012      2013      2012  
     (in thousands)      (in thousands)  

Proceeds

   $ 1,908       $ 44,310       $ 1,908       $ 65,695   

Gross gains

     704         1,511         704         3,530   

Gross losses

     1         —           1         —     

The amortized cost and fair value of the debt investment securities portfolio are shown by contractual maturity. Contractual maturities may differ from actual maturities if issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities not due at a single maturity date are detailed separately.

 

     June 30, 2013  
     Amortized
Cost
     Fair
Value
 
     (in thousands)  

Maturity

     

Available-for-sale

     

Within one year

   $ 17,901       $ 17,928   

One to five years

     14,213         15,289   

Five to ten years

     64,364         63,449   

Beyond ten years

     9,619         9,430   

Agency mortgage-backed: residential

     71,740         70,569   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 177,837       $ 176,665   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

10


Table of Contents

Securities pledged at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 had carrying values of approximately $59.0 million and $76.4 million, respectively, and were pledged to secure public deposits and repurchase agreements.

The Company evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment (OTTI) on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, underlying credit quality of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the Company may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, the sector or industry trends and cycles affecting the issuer, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. Management currently intends to hold all securities with unrealized losses until recovery, which for fixed income securities may be at maturity.

At June 30, 2013, the Company held one equity security. This security was in an unrealized gain position as of June 30, 2013. Management monitors the underlying financial condition of the issuers and current market pricing for this equity security monthly. As of June 30, 2013, management does not believe securities in our portfolio with unrealized losses should be classified as other than temporarily impaired. Management currently intends to hold securities with unrealized losses until recovery, which for fixed income securities may be at maturity.

Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows:

 

     Less than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  

Description of Securities

   Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Loss
    Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Loss
    Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Loss
 
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013:

               

U.S Government & federal agency

   $ 20,428       $ (659   $ —         $ —        $ 20,428       $ (659

Agency mortgage-backed: residential

     51,069         (1,474     4,525         (151     55,594         (1,625

State and municipal

     31,198         (1,453     1,082         (57     32,280         (1,510

Corporate bonds

     7,836         (160     —           —          7,836         (160
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired

   $ 110,531       $ (3,746   $ 5,607       $ (208   $ 116,138       $ (3,954
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2012:

               

Agency mortgage-backed: residential

   $ 23,375       $ (257   $ —         $ —        $ 23,375       $ (257

State and municipal

     7,961         (87     —           —          7,961         (87

Corporate bonds

     3,777         (37     —           —          3,777         (37

Equity

     2         —          —           —          2         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired

   $ 35,115       $ (381   $ —         $ —        $ 35,115       $ (381
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

11


Table of Contents

Note 4 – Loans

Loans were as follows:

 

      June 30,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 
     (in thousands)  

Commercial

   $ 51,079      $ 52,567   

Commercial Real Estate:

    

Construction

     57,951        70,284   

Farmland

     72,312        80,825   

Other

     256,859        322,687   

Residential Real Estate:

    

Multi-family

     47,253        50,986   

1-4 Family

     247,248        278,273   

Consumer

     16,746        20,383   

Agriculture

     24,613        22,317   

Other

     724        770   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal

     774,785        899,092   

Less: Allowance for loan losses

     (37,559     (56,680
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans, net

   $ 737,226      $ 842,412   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

     Commercial     Commercial
Real Estate
    Residential
Real  Estate
    Consumer     Agriculture     Other      Total  
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 4,990      $ 22,169      $ 11,540      $ 716      $ 410      $ 14       $ 39,839   

Provision for loan losses

     (805     321        360        (7 )     127        4         —     

Loans charged off

     (132     (1,866     (1,137     (203 )     (66     —           (3,404

Recoveries

     595        398        27        88        16        —           1,124   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 4,648      $ 21,022      $ 10,790      $ 594      $ 487      $ 18       $ 37,559   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

June 30, 2012:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 4,082      $ 32,982      $ 15,720      $ 812      $ 345      $ 12       $ 53,953   

Provision for loan losses

     (78     1,003        2,696        97        282        —           4,000   

Loans charged off

     (210     (2,944     (2,862     (135     (287     —           (6,438

Recoveries

     17        8        33        18        3        —           79   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 3,811      $ 31,049      $ 15,587      $ 792      $ 343      $ 12       $ 51,594   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

12


Table of Contents

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

     Commercial     Commercial
Real Estate
    Residential
Real  Estate
    Consumer     Agriculture     Other     Total  
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013:

              

Beginning balance

   $ 4,402      $ 34,768      $ 16,235      $ 857      $ 403      $ 15      $ 56,680   

Provision for loan losses

     633        (124     (90     79        (51     3        450   

Loans charged off

     (1,108     (14,178     (5,476     (521 )     (83     —          (21,366

Recoveries

     721        556        121        179        218        —          1,795   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 4,648      $ 21,022      $ 10,790      $ 594      $ 487      $ 18      $ 37,559   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

June 30, 2012:

              

Beginning balance

   $ 4,207      $ 33,024      $ 14,217      $ 792      $ 325      $ 14      $ 52,579   

Provision for loan losses

     11        1,775        5,202        321        443        (2     7,750   

Loans charged off

     (466     (3,863     (3,891     (372     (428     —          (9,020

Recoveries

     59        113        59        51        3        —          285   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 3,811      $ 31,049      $ 15,587      $ 792      $ 343      $ 12      $ 51,594   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of June 30, 2013:

 

     Commercial      Commercial
Real Estate
     Residential
Real  Estate
     Consumer      Agriculture      Other      Total  
     (in thousands)  

Allowance for loan losses:

                    

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:

                    

Individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 1,388       $ 7,597       $ 1,171       $ 21       $ —         $ 13       $ 10,190   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

     3,260         13,425         9,619         573         487         5         27,369   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ending allowance balance

   $ 4,648       $ 21,022       $ 10,790       $ 594       $ 487       $ 18       $ 37,559   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans:

                    

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 6,448       $ 115,387       $ 52,359       $ 110       $ 199       $ 535       $ 175,038   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     44,631         271,735         242,142         16,636         24,414         189         599,747   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ending loans balance

   $ 51,079       $ 387,122       $ 294,501       $ 16,746       $ 24,613       $ 724       $ 774,785   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

13


Table of Contents

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of December 31, 2012:

 

     Commercial      Commercial
Real Estate
     Residential
Real  Estate
     Consumer      Agriculture      Other      Total  
     (in thousands)  

Allowance for loan losses:

                    

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:

                    

Individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 263       $ 16,046       $ 4,641       $ 68       $ 5       $ 11       $ 21,034   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

     4,139         18,722         11,594         789         398         4         35,646   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ending allowance balance

   $ 4,402       $ 34,768       $ 16,235       $ 857       $ 403       $ 15       $ 56,680   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans:

                    

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 5,296       $ 125,922       $ 56,799       $ 212       $ 55       $ 524       $ 188,808   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     47,271         347,874         272,460         20,171         22,262         246         710,284   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ending loans balance

   $ 52,567       $ 473,796       $ 329,259       $ 20,383       $ 22,317       $ 770       $ 899,092   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

Impaired loans include restructured loans and commercial, construction, agriculture and commercial real estate loans on nonaccrual or classified as doubtful, whereby collection of the total amount is improbable, or loss, whereby all or a portion of the loan has been written off or a specific allowance for loss has been provided.

The following table presents information related to loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013:

 

                   Allowance
For Loan
Losses
Allocated
     Three Months Ended
June 30, 2013
     Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
 
     Unpaid
Principal
Balance
     Recorded
Investment
        Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
     Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
     Cash Basis
Income
Recognized
 
                   (in thousands)                                     

With No Related Allowance Recorded:

                       

Commercial

   $ 2,230       $ 1,898       $ —         $ 1,892       $ —         $ 1,673       $ —         $ —     

Commercial real estate:

                       

Construction

     281         191         —           496         6         700         11         11   

Farmland

     4,369         4,302         —           4,187         105         4,274         172         172   

Other

     1,737         1,526         —           1,671         253         1,745         257         257   

Residential real estate:

                       

Multi-family

     637         637         —           638         —           640         —           —     

1-4 Family

     11,392         10,997         —           12,174         38         12,502         57         57   

Consumer

     1         1         —           8         —           28         —           —     

Agriculture

     278         199         —           185         —           138         —           —     

Other

     17         17         —           8         —           6         —           —     

With An Allowance Recorded:

                       

Commercial

     5,072         4,550         1,388         4,165         31         4,131         61         —     

Commercial real estate:

                       

Construction

     23,669         22,347         411         23,414         34         24,094         68         —     

Farmland

     7,914         5,545         253         5,797         11         6,017         22         —     

Other

     96,076         81,475         6,933         79,407         352         81,792         682         —     

Residential real estate:

                       

Multi-family

     14,646         12,937         411         13,046         51         13,666         107         —     

1-4 Family

     30,342         27,788         760         28,492         115         28,359         218         —     

Consumer

     178         110         21         155         1         150         1         —     

Agriculture

     —           —           —           —           —           4         —           —     

Other

     518         518         13         520         4         521         8         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 199,357       $ 175,038       $ 10,190       $ 176,255       $ 1,001       $ 180,440       $ 1,664       $ 497   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

14


Table of Contents

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loan as of December 31, 2012:

 

     Unpaid
Principal
Balance
     Recorded
Investment
     Allowance
For Loan
Losses
Allocated
     Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
     Cash
Basis
Income
Recognized
 
     (in thousands)  

With No Related Allowance Recorded:

                 

Commercial

   $ 1,460       $ 1,234       $ —         $ 1,637       $ 5       $ 4   

Commercial real estate:

                 

Construction

     1,155         1,109         —           1,745         2         2   

Farmland

     4,448         4,448         —           4,706         57         57   

Other

     2,134         1,892         —           3,436         3         3   

Residential real estate:

                 

Multi-family

     643         643         —           910         —           —     

1-4 Family

     13,539         13,158         —           11,291         56         56   

Consumer

     70         70         —           219         8         5   

Agriculture

     45         45         —           366         2         —     

Other

     —           —           —           —           —           —     

With An Allowance Recorded:

                 

Commercial

     4,108         4,062         263         3,964         169         27   

Commercial real estate:

                 

Construction

     26,645         25,455         1,543         19,514         348         5   

Farmland

     8,557         6,456         734         5,794         43         2   

Other

     97,699         86,562         13,769         83,087         2,011         185   

Residential real estate:

                 

Multi-family

     14,906         14,906         1,643         11,187         468         —     

1-4 Family

     31,021         28,092         2,998         27,404         787         9   

Consumer

     142         142         68         29         —           —     

Agriculture

     10         10         5         6         —           —     

Other

     524         524         11         533         17         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 207,106       $ 188,808       $ 21,034       $ 175,828       $ 3,976       $ 355   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Troubled Debt Restructuring

A troubled debt restructuring (TDR) occurs when the Company has agreed to a loan modification in the form of a concession for a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty. The majority of the Company’s TDRs involve a reduction in interest rate, a deferral of principal for a stated period of time, or an interest only period. All TDRs are considered impaired and the Company has allocated reserves for these loans to reflect the present value of the concessionary terms granted to the customer.

The following table presents the types of TDR loan modifications by portfolio segment outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 

     TDRs
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     TDRs Not
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     Total
TDRs
 
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013

     

Commercial

     

Rate reduction

   $ 1,981       $ —         $ 1,981   

Principal deferral

     881         —           881   

Interest only payments

     —           238         238   

Commercial Real Estate:

        

Construction

        

Rate reduction

     3,409         3,353         6,762   

Principal deferral

     499         —           499   

Farmland

        

Rate reduction

     150         —           150   

Principal deferral

     712         2,438         3,150   

 

15


Table of Contents

Other

        

Rate reduction

     29,526         20,463         49,989   

Principal deferral

     1,182         —           1,182   

Interest only payments

     2,458         1,489         3,947   

Residential Real Estate:

        

Multi-family

        

Rate reduction

     4,694         6,836         11,530   

Interest only payments

     647         —           647   

1-4 Family

        

Rate reduction

     8,217         11,693         19,910   

Consumer

        

Rate reduction

     53         —           53   

Other

        

Rate reduction

     518         —           518   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total TDRs

   $ 54,927       $ 46,510       $ 101,437   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     TDRs
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     TDRs Not
Performing  to
Modified
Terms
     Total
TDRs
 
     (in thousands)  

December 31, 2012

        

Commercial

        

Rate reduction

   $ 1,972       $ —         $ 1,972   

Principal deferral

     887         —           887   

Interest only payments

     —           958         958   

Commercial Real Estate:

        

Construction

        

Rate reduction

     4,834         4,459         9,293   

Farmland

        

Rate reduction

     150         —           150   

Principal deferral

     725         2,438         3,163   

Other

        

Rate reduction

     36,515         22,631         59,146   

Principal deferral

     1,195         —           1,195   

Interest only payments

     2,466         2,107         4,573   

Residential Real Estate:

        

Multi-family

        

Rate reduction

     13,087         —           13,087   

Interest only payments

     652         —           652   

1-4 Family

        

Rate reduction

     14,323         7,871         22,194   

Consumer

        

Rate reduction

     14         —           14   

Other

        

Rate reduction

     524         —           524   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total TDRs

   $ 77,344       $ 40,464       $ 117,808   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, 54% and 66%, respectively, of the Company’s TDRs were performing according to their modified terms. The Company allocated $5.2 million and $15.1 million in reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs as of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company has committed to lend additional amounts totaling $262,000 and $259,000 as of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively, to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as TDRs.

 

16


Table of Contents

The following tables present a summary of the types of TDR loan modifications by portfolio type that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

     TDRs
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     TDRs Not
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     Total
TDRs
 
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013

     

Commercial Real Estate:

        

Construction

        

Principal deferral

   $ 499       $ —         $ 499   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total TDRs

   $ 499       $ —         $ 499   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     TDRs
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     TDRs Not
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     Total
TDRs
 
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2012

        

Commercial Real Estate:

        

Construction

        

Interest only payments

   $ 152       $ —         $ 152   

Other

        

Rate reduction

     8,152         —           8,152   

Principal deferral

     1,196         —           1,196   

Interest only payments

     2,462         —           2,462   

Residential Real Estate:

        

1-4 Family

        

Rate reduction

     3,086         —          3,086   

Principal deferral

     —           573         573   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total TDRs

   $ 15,048       $ 573       $ 15,621   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, 100% and 96%, respectively, of the Company’s TDRs that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were performing according to their modified terms. The Company allocated $49,000 and $1.3 million in reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For modifications occurring during the three month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the post-modification balances approximate the pre-modification balances.

 

17


Table of Contents

The following tables present a summary of the types of TDR loan modifications by portfolio type that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

     TDRs
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     TDRs Not
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     Total
TDRs
 
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013

        

Commercial:

        

Rate reduction

   $ 45       $ —         $ 45   

Commercial Real Estate:

        

Construction

        

Rate reduction

     —           1,291         1,291   

Principal deferral

     499         —           499   

Other

        

Rate reduction

     1,399         —           1,399   

Residential Real Estate:

        

1-4 Family

        

Rate reduction

     897         —           897   

Consumer:

        

Rate reduction

     40         —           40   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total TDRs

   $ 2,880       $ 1,291       $ 4,171   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     TDRs
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     TDRs Not
Performing to
Modified
Terms
     Total
TDRs
 
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2012

        

Commercial:

        

Interest only payments

   $ —         $ 1,019       $ 1,019   

Commercial Real Estate:

        

Construction

        

Interest only payments

     152         —           152   

Other

        

Rate reduction

     11,302         —           11,302   

Principal deferral

     1,196         —           1,196   

Interest only payments

     2,462         2,174         4,636   

Residential Real Estate:

        

Multi-family

        

Rate reduction

     8,386         —           8,386   

1-4 Family

        

Rate reduction

     8,470         —          8,470   

Principal deferral

     —           573         573   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total TDRs

   $ 31,968       $ 3,766       $ 35,734   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, 69% and 89%, respectively, of the Company’s TDRs that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were performing according to their modified terms. The Company allocated $230,000 and $2.6 million in reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For modifications occurring during the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the post-modification balances approximate the pre-modification balances.

During the first six months of 2013, approximately $1.5 million TDRs defaulted on their restructured loan and the default occurred within the 12 month period following the loan modification. These defaults were construction and development loans. A default is considered to have occurred once the TDR is past due 90 days or more or it has been placed on nonaccrual. During the first six months of 2012, approximately $7.9 million TDRs defaulted on their restructured loan and the default occurred within the 12 month period following the loan modification. These defaults consisted of $6.3 million in commercial real estate loans, $1.0 million in commercial loans, and $622,000 in 1-4 family residential real estate loans. A default is considered to have occurred once the TDR is past due 90 days or more or it has been placed on nonaccrual.

 

18


Table of Contents

Nonperforming Loans

Nonperforming loans include impaired loans not on accrual and smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential mortgage and consumer loans, that are collectively evaluated for impairment.

The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual and loans past due 90 days and still on accrual by class of loan as of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012:

 

     Nonaccrual      Loans Past
Due 90 Days
And Over Still
Accruing
 
     June
30,
2013
     December
31,
2012
     June
30,

2013
     December
31,
2012
 
     (in thousands)  

Commercial

   $ 3,333       $ 2,437       $ —         $ 36   

Commercial Real Estate:

           

Construction

     18,630         7,808         —           —     

Farmland

     8,985         10,030         —           —     

Other

     43,979         46,036         —           —     

Residential Real Estate:

           

Multi-family

     8,020         1,516         —           —     

1-4 Family

     28,964         26,501         66         50   

Consumer

     58         135         5         —     

Agriculture

     199         54         —           —     

Other

     17         —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 112,185       $ 94,517       $ 71       $ 86   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 

     30 – 59
Days
Past Due
     60 – 89
Days
Past Due
     90 Days
And  Over
Past Due
     Nonaccrual      Total
Past Due
And
Nonaccrual
 
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013

              

Commercial

   $ 1,165       $ 133       $ —         $ 3,333       $ 4,631   

Commercial Real Estate:

              

Construction

     —           —           —           18,630         18,630   

Farmland

     841         389         —           8,985         10,215   

Other

     2,338         1,805         —           43,979         48,122   

Residential Real Estate:

              

Multi-family

     1,191         —           —           8,020         9,211   

1-4 Family

     2,797         585         66         28,964         32,412   

Consumer

     194         37         5         58         294   

Agriculture

     74         30         —           199         303   

Other

     —           —           —           17         17   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 8,600       $ 2,979       $ 71       $ 112,185       $ 123,835   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

19


Table of Contents
     30 – 59
Days
Past Due
     60 – 89
Days
Past Due
     90 Days
And  Over
Past Due
     Nonaccrual      Total
Past Due
And
Nonaccrual
 
     (in thousands)  

December 31, 2012

              

Commercial

   $ 1,279       $ 90       $ 36       $ 2,437       $ 3,842   

Commercial Real Estate:

              

Construction

     10,510         5,815         —           7,808         24,133   

Farmland

     922         58         —           10,030         11,010   

Other

     5,138         13,037         —           46,036         64,211   

Residential Real Estate:

              

Multi-family

     8,762         —           —           1,516         10,278   

1-4 Family

     11,145         1,221         50         26,501         38,917   

Consumer

     310         75         —           135         520   

Agriculture

     153         7         —           54         214   

Other

     —           —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 38,219       $ 20,303       $ 86       $ 94,517       $ 153,125   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Credit Quality Indicators – We categorize loans into risk categories at origination based upon original underwriting. Thereafter, we categorize loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. Loans are analyzed individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes loans with an outstanding balance greater than $500,000 and non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial and commercial real estate loans. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. We do not have any non-rated loans. The following definitions are used for risk ratings:

Watch – Loans classified as watch are those loans which have experienced a potentially adverse development which necessitates increased monitoring.

Special Mention – Loans classified as special mention do not have all of the characteristics of substandard or doubtful loans. They have one or more deficiencies which warrant special attention and which corrective action, such as accelerated collection practices, may remedy.

Substandard – Loans classified as substandard are those loans with clear and defined weaknesses such as a highly leveraged position, unfavorable financial ratios, uncertain repayment sources or poor financial condition which may jeopardize the repayment of the debt as contractually agreed. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some losses if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful are those loans which have characteristics similar to substandard loans but with an increased risk that collection or liquidation in full is highly questionable and improbable.

 

20


Table of Contents

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be “Pass” rated loans. As of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:

 

     Pass      Watch      Special
Mention
     Substandard      Doubtful      Total  
     (in thousands)  

June 30, 2013

                 

Commercial

   $ 31,050       $ 8,304       $ 1,322       $ 10,355       $ 48       $ 51,079   

Commercial Real Estate:

                 

Construction

     19,551         11,532         2,568         24,300         —           57,951   

Farmland

     43,327         13,006         1,361         14,618         —           72,312   

Other

     91,608         61,788         9,772         93,437         254         256,859   

Residential Real Estate:

                 

Multi-family

     15,725         15,940         —           15,588         —           47,253   

1-4 Family

     138,728         47,358         2,809         58,353         —           247,248   

Consumer

     14,952         1,104         13         677         —           16,746   

Agriculture

     21,605         1,415         915         678         —           24,613   

Other

     189         518         —           17         —           724   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 376,735       $ 160,965       $ 18,760       $ 218,023       $ 302       $ 774,785   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Pass      Watch      Special
Mention
     Substandard      Doubtful      Total  
     (in thousands)  

December 31, 2012

                 

Commercial

   $ 27,085       $ 10,153       $ 6,495       $ 8,772       $ 62       $ 52,567   

Commercial Real Estate:

                 

Construction

     26,085         21,713         3,647         18,839         —           70,284   

Farmland

     47,017         13,461         3,532         16,815         —           80,825   

Other

     122,603         66,223         14,955         118,635         271         322,687   

Residential Real Estate:

                 

Multi-family

     18,387         14,637         —           17,962         —           50,986   

1-4 Family

     159,975         47,030         5,167         66,101         —           278,273   

Consumer

     17,232         2,211         35         842         63         20,383   

Agriculture

     19,256         1,467         869         725         —           22,317   

Other

     246         524         —           —           —           770   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 437,886       $ 177,419       $ 34,700       $ 248,691       $ 396       $ 899,092   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 5 – Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned (OREO) is real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure. It is classified as real estate owned until such time as it is sold. When property is acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure, it is recorded at its fair market value less cost to sell. Any write-down of the property at the time of acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent reductions in fair value are recorded as non-interest expense. To determine the fair value of OREO for smaller dollar single family homes, we consult with internal real estate sales staff and external realtors, investors, and appraisers. If the internally evaluated market price is below our underlying investment in the property, appropriate write-downs are taken.

For larger dollar residential and commercial real estate properties, we obtain a new appraisal of the subject property in connection with the transfer to other real estate owned. We typically obtain updated appraisals each year on the anniversary date of ownership unless a sale is imminent.

 

21


Table of Contents

The following table presents the major categories of OREO at the period-ends indicated:

 

     June
30,
2013
    December
31,
2012
 
     (in thousands)  

Commercial Real Estate:

    

Construction

   $ 20,592      $ 22,912   

Farmland

     737        618   

Other

     18,661        15,577   

Residential Real Estate:

    

Multi-family

     464        200   

1-4 Family

     7,323        5,518   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     47,777        44,825   

Valuation allowance

     (747     (1,154
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 47,030      $ 43,671   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,
    For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2012     2013     2012  
     (in thousands)     (in thousands)  

OREO Valuation Allowance Activity:

        

Beginning balance

   $ 928      $ 1,682      $ 1,154      $ 1,667   

Provision to allowance

     977        350        1,284        830   

Write-downs

     (1,158     (308     (1,691     (773
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 747      $ 1,724      $ 747      $ 1,724   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net activity relating to other real estate owned during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

 

     2013     2012  
     (in thousands)  

OREO Activity

    

OREO as of January 1

   $ 43,671      $ 41,449   

Real estate acquired

     15,555        28,126   

Valuation adjustments for declining market values

     (1,284     (830

Improvements

     —          1   

Loss on sale

     (359     (948

Proceeds from sale of properties

     (10,553     (13,433
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

OREO as of June 30

   $ 47,030      $ 54,365   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expenses related to other real estate owned include:

 

     Three Months Ended
June  30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013      2012      2013      2012  
     (in thousands)      (in thousands)  

Net loss on sales

   $ 162       $ 546       $ 359       $ 948   

Provision to allowance

     977         350         1,284         830   

Operating expense

     518         309         805         684   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,657       $ 1,205       $ 2,448       $ 2,462   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

22


Table of Contents

Note 6 – Deposits

The following table shows deposits by category:

 

     June 30,
2013
     December 31,
2012
 
     (in thousands)  

Non-interest bearing

   $ 106,320       $ 114,310   

Interest checking

     78,218         87,234   

Money market

     65,620         63,715   

Savings

     40,121         39,227   

Certificates of deposit

     690,557         760,573   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 980,836       $ 1,065,059   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Time deposits of $100,000 or more were $288.2 million and $319.5 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Scheduled maturities of total time deposits at June 30, 2013 for each of the next five years are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Retail      Brokered      Total  

Year 1

   $ 362,928       $ —         $ 362,928   

Year 2

     258,311         —           258,311   

Year 3

     49,930         —           49,930   

Year 4

     10,034         —           10,034   

Year 5

     9,277         —           9,277   

Thereafter

     77         —           77   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 690,557       $ —         $ 690,557   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Historically, the Bank has utilized brokered and wholesale deposits to supplement its funding strategy. At December 31, 2012, the Bank held $15.0 million in brokered deposits, which matured and were redeemed in the second quarter of 2013. As stipulated in the Consent Order, PBI Bank is currently restricted from accepting, renewing, or rolling-over brokered deposits without the prior receipt of a waiver on a case-by-case basis from our regulators.

Note 7 – Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were as follows:

 

     June
30,
2013
     December
31,
2012
 
     (in thousands)  

Monthly amortizing advances with fixed rates from 0.00% to 5.25% and maturities ranging from 2013 through 2033, averaging 3.15% for 2013

   $ 5,016       $ 5,604   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Each advance is payable per terms on agreement, with a prepayment penalty. The advances are collateralized by first mortgage loans. The borrowing capacity is based on the market value of the underlying pledged loans rather than the unpaid principal balance of the pledged loans. At June 30, 2013, our additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB was $15.5 million. The availability of our borrowing capacity could be affected by our financial position and the FHLB could require additional collateral or, among other things, exercise its right to deny a funding request, at its discretion. Additionally, any new advances are limited to a one year maturity or less.

Note 8 – Fair Values Measurement

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We use various valuation techniques to determine fair value, including market, income and cost approaches. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that an entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date, or observable inputs.

 

23


Table of Contents

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. When that occurs, we classify the fair value hierarchy on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. We used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value.

Securities: The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges, if available. This valuation method is classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated on market prices of similar securities, or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Matrix pricing relies on the securities’ relationship to similarly traded securities, benchmark curves, and the benchmarking of like securities. Matrix pricing utilizes observable market inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, reference data, and industry and economic events. In instances where broker quotes are used, these quotes are obtained from market makers or broker-dealers recognized to be market participants. This valuation method is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators. This valuation method is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Discounted cash flows are calculated using spread to swap and LIBOR curves that are updated to incorporate loss severities, volatility, credit spread and optionality. During times when trading is more liquid, broker quotes are used (if available) to validate the model. Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the calculations.

Impaired Loans: An impaired loan is evaluated at the time the loan is identified as impaired and is recorded at fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loan and is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Fair value is determined using several methods. Generally, the fair value of real estate is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach.

Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. These routine adjustments are made to adjust the value of a specific property relative to comparable properties for variations in qualities such as location, size, and income production capacity relative to the subject property of the appraisal. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

We routinely apply an internal discount to the value of appraisals used in the fair value evaluation of our impaired loans. The deductions to the appraisal take into account changing business factors and market conditions, as well as potential value impairment in cases where the date of the appraisal of the collateral predates a likely change in market conditions. These deductions range from 10% for routine real estate collateral to 30% for real estate that is determined (1) to have a thin trading market or (2) to be for unique use. This is in addition to estimated discounts for cost to sell of ten percent.

We also apply discounts to the expected fair value of collateral for impaired loans where the likely resolution involves litigation of foreclosure. Resolution of this nature generally results in receiving lower values for real estate collateral in a more aggressive sales environment. We have utilized discounts ranging from 10% to 33% in our impairment evaluations when applicable.

Impaired loans are evaluated quarterly for additional impairment. We obtain updated appraisals on properties securing our loans when circumstances are warranted such as at the time of renewal or when market conditions have significantly changed. This determination is made on a property-by-property basis in light of circumstances in the broader economic climate and our assessment of deterioration of real estate values in the market in which the property is located. The first stage of our assessment involves management’s inspection of the property in question. Management also engages in conversations with local real estate professionals, investors, and market makers to determine the likely marketing time and value range for the property. The second stage involves an assessment of current trends in the regional market. After thorough consideration of these factors, management will either internally evaluate fair value or order a new appraisal.

 

24


Table of Contents

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO): OREO is evaluated at the time of acquisition and recorded at fair value as determined by independent appraisal or internal market evaluation less cost to sell. Our quarterly evaluations of OREO for impairment are driven by property type. For smaller dollar single family homes, we consult with internal real estate sales staff and external realtors, investors, and appraisers. Based on these consultations, we determine asking prices for OREO properties we are marketing for sale. If the internally evaluated fair value is below our recorded investment in the property, appropriate write-downs are taken.

For larger dollar commercial real estate properties, we obtain a new appraisal of the subject property in connection with the transfer to other real estate owned. In some of these circumstances, an appraisal is in process at quarter end, and we must make our best estimate of fair value based on our internal evaluation of the property, review of the most recent appraisal, and discussions with the currently engaged appraiser. We typically obtain updated appraisals on the anniversary date of ownership unless a sale is imminent.

We routinely apply an internal discount to the value of appraisals used in the fair value evaluation of our OREO. The deductions to the appraisal take into account changing business factors and market conditions, as well as potential value impairment in cases where our appraisal date predates a likely change in market conditions. These deductions range from 10% for routine real estate to 30% for real estate that is determined (1) to have a thin trading market or (2) to be for unique use. This is in addition to estimated discounts for cost to sell of ten percent.

Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized below:

 

            Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using  
            (in thousands)  

Description

   Carrying
Value
     Quoted Prices In
Active  Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Available-for-sale securities

           

U.S. Government and federal agency

   $ 26,303       $ —         $ 26,303       $ —     

Agency mortgage-backed: residential

     70,569         —           70,569         —     

State and municipal

     55,299         —           55,299         —     

Corporate bonds

     23,863         —           23,863         —     

Other debt securities

     631         —           —           631   

Equity securities

     277         277         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 176,942       $ 277       $ 176,034       $ 631   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using  
            (in thousands)  

Description

   Carrying
Value
     Quoted Prices In
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Available-for-sale securities

           

U.S. Government and federal agency

   $ 6,133       $ —         $ 6,133       $ —     

Agency mortgage-backed: residential

     95,182         —           95,182         —     

State and municipal

     54,733         —           54,733         —     

Corporate bonds

     19,964         —           19,964         —     

Other debt securities

     618         —           —           618   

Equity securities

     1,846         1,846         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 178,476       $ 1,846       $ 176,012       $ 618   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2013 or 2012.

 

25


Table of Contents

The table below presents a reconciliation of all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

     State and  Municipal
Securities
    Other  Debt
Securities
 
     

2013

     2012     2013      2012  
     (in thousands)  

Balances of recurring Level 3 assets at January 1

   $ —         $ 1,173      $ 618       $ 606   

Total gain (loss) for the period:

          

Included in other comprehensive income (loss)

     —           —          13         —     

Sales

     —           (1,173     —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance of recurring Level 3 assets at June 30

   $ —         $ —        $ 631       $ 606   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Level 3 state and municipal securities valuations are supported by analysis prepared by an independent third party. Their approach to determining fair value involves using recently executed transactions for similar securities and market quotations for similar securities. As securities of this type are not rated by the rating agencies and trading volumes are thin, it was determined that these were valued using Level 3 inputs. We sold our Level 3 municipal securities in the second quarter of 2012 and had no securities of this nature at June 30, 2013.

Our other debt security valuation is determined internally by calculating discounted cash flows using the security’s coupon rate of 6.5% and an estimated current market rate of 9.5% based upon the current yield curve plus spreads that adjust for volatility, credit risk, and optionality. We also consider the issuer(s) publicly filed financial information as well as assumptions regarding the likelihood of deferrals and defaults.

Financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:

 

            Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using  
            (in thousands)  

Description

   Carrying
Value
     Quoted Prices In
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Impaired loans:

           

Commercial

   $ 3,162       $ —         $ —         $ 3,162   

Commercial real estate:

           

Construction

     21,936         —           —           21,936   

Farmland

     5,292         —           —           5,292   

Other

     74,541         —           —           74,541   

Residential real estate:

           

Multi-family

     12,526         —           —           12,526   

1-4 Family

     27,028         —           —           27,028   

Consumer

     90         —           —           90   

Other

     505         —           —           505   

Other real estate owned, net:

           

Commercial real estate:

           

Construction

     20,270         —           —           20,270   

Farmland

     725         —           —           725   

Other

     18,369         —           —           18,369   

Residential real estate:

           

Multi-family

     457         —           —           457   

1-4 Family

     7,209         —           —           7,209   

 

26


Table of Contents
            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using  
            (in thousands)  

Description

   Carrying
Value
     Quoted Prices In
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Impaired loans:

        

Commercial

   $ 3,799       $ —         $ —         $ 3,799   

Commercial real estate:

           

Construction

     23,912         —           —           23,912   

Farmland

     5,722         —           —           5,722   

Other

     72,793         —           —           72,793   

Residential real estate:

           

Multi-family

     13,263         —           —           13,263   

1-4 Family

     25,094         —           —           25,094   

Consumer

     74         —           —           74   

Agriculture

     5         —           —           5   

Other

     513         —           —           513   

Other real estate owned, net:

           

Commercial real estate:

           

Construction

     22,323         —           —           22,323   

Farmland

     602         —           —           602   

Other

     15,175         —           —           15,175   

Residential real estate:

           

Multi-family

     195         —           —           195   

1-4 Family

     5,376         —           —           5,376   

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $155.3 million at June 30, 2013 with a valuation allowance of $10.2 million. This resulted in no additional provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2013. At December 31, 2012, impaired loans had a carrying amount of $166.2 million, with a valuation allowance of $21.0 million.

Other real estate owned, which is measured at the lower of carrying or fair value less estimated costs to sell, had a net carrying amount of $47.0 million as of June 30, 2013, compared with $43.7 million at December 31, 2012. Fair value write-downs of $1.3 million were recorded on other real estate owned for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

27


Table of Contents

The following table presents qualitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2013:

 

     Fair Value     

Valuation

Technique(s)

  

Unobservable Input(s)

  

Range (Weighted

Average)

     (in thousands)                 

Impaired loans – Commercial

   $ 3,162      

Market value approach

  

Adjustment for receivables and
inventory discounts

   16% - 32% (24%)

Impaired loans – Commercial real estate

   $ 101,769      

Sales comparison approach

  

Adjustment for differences
between the comparable sales

   0% - 69% (19%)

Impaired loans – Residential real estate

   $ 39,554      

Sales comparison approach

  

Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

   0% - 50% (15%)

Other real estate owned –Commercial real estate

   $ 39,364      

Sales comparison approach Income approach

  

Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

Discount or capitalization rate

  

3% - 56% (24%)

7% - 16% (11%)

Other real estate owned – Residential real estate

   $ 7,666      

Sales comparison approach

  

Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

   4% - 31% (12%)

The following table presents qualitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2012:

 

     Fair Value     

Valuation

Technique(s)

  

Unobservable Input(s)

  

Range (Weighted

Average)

     (in thousands)                 

Impaired loans – Commercial

   $ 3,799      

Market value approach

  

Adjustment for receivables
and inventory discounts

   16% - 32% (24%)

Impaired loans – Commercial real estate

   $ 89,461      

Sales comparison approach

  

Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

   0% - 69% (19%)

Impaired loans – Residential real estate

   $ 38,357      

Sales comparison approach

  

Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

   0% - 38% (15%)

Other real estate owned – Commercial real estate

   $ 38,100      

Sales comparison approach

Income approach

  

Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

Discount or capitalization rate

  

3% - 50% (18%)

9% - 16% (12%)

Other real estate owned – Residential real estate

   $ 5,571      

Sales comparison approach

  

Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

   0% - 30% (9%)

 

28


Table of Contents

Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows for the periods indicated:

 

            Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using  
     Carrying
Amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  
     (in thousands)  

Financial assets

           

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 64,266       $ 58,585       $ 5,681       $ —         $ 64,266   

Securities available for sale

     176,942         277         176,034         631         176,942   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     10,072         N/A         N/A         N/A         N/A   

Mortgage loans held for sale

     133         —           133         —           133   

Loans, net

     737,226         —           —           752,688         752,688   

Accrued interest receivable

     4,184         —           1,227         2,957         4,184   

Financial liabilities

              

Deposits

   $ 980,836       $ 103,748       $ 878,837       $ —         $ 982,585   

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

     3,292         —           3,292         —           3,292   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     5,016         —           5,019         —           5,019   

Subordinated capital notes

     6,525         —           —           6,195         6,195   

Junior subordinated debentures

     25,000         —           —           13,913         13,913   

Accrued interest payable

     2,277         —           1,042         1,235         2,277   

 

            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using  
     Carrying
Amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  
     (in thousands)  

Financial assets

           

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 49,572       $ 41,938       $ 7,634       $ —         $ 49,572   

Securities available for sale

     178,476         1,846         176,012         618         178,476   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     10,072         N/A         N/A         N/A         N/A   

Mortgage loans held for sale

     507         —           507         —           507   

Loans, net

     842,412         —           —           853,996         853,996   

Accrued interest receivable

     5,138         —           1,150         3,988         5,138   

Financial liabilities

              

Deposits

   $ 1,065,059       $ 114,310       $ 955,216       $ —         $ 1,069,526   

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

     2,634         —           2,634         —           2,634   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     5,604         —           5,607         —           5,607   

Subordinated capital notes

     6,975         —           —           6,599         6,599   

Junior subordinated debentures

     25,000         —           —           13,821         13,821   

Accrued interest payable

     2,104         —           1,173         931         2,104   

The methods and assumptions, not previously presented, used to estimate fair values are described as follows:

(a) Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values and are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2. Noninterest bearing deposits are Level 1 whereas interest bearing due from bank accounts and fed funds sold are Level 2.

(b) FHLB Stock

It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.

(c) Loans, Net

Fair values of loans, excluding loans held for sale, are estimated as follows: For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values resulting in a Level 3 classification. Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality resulting in a Level 3 classification. Impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost or fair value as described previously. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.

(d) Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated based upon binding contracts and quotes from third party investors resulting in a Level 2 classification.

 

29


Table of Contents

(e) Deposits

The fair values disclosed for non-interest bearing deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date resulting in a Level 1 classification. The carrying amounts of variable rate interest bearing deposits approximate their fair values at the reporting date resulting in a Level 2 classification. Fair values for fixed rate interest bearing deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flows calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits resulting in a Level 2 classification.

(f) Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

The carrying amounts of borrowings under repurchase agreements approximate their fair values resulting in a Level 2 classification.

(g) Other Borrowings

The fair values of the Company’s FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates resulting in a Level 2 classification.

The fair values of the Company’s subordinated capital notes and junior subordinated debentures are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements resulting in a Level 3 classification.

(h) Accrued Interest Receivable/Payable

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value resulting in a Level 2 or Level 3 classification based on the level of the asset or liability with which the accrual is associated.

Note 9 – Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities were due to the following as of:

 

     June 30,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 
     (in thousands)  

Deferred tax assets:

    

Allowance for loan losses

   $ 13,146      $ 19,838   

Other real estate owned write-down

     9,959        10,408   

Net operating loss carry-forward

     23,302        15,051   

New market tax credit carry-forward

     208        208   

Alternative minimum tax credit carry-forward

     692        692   

Net assets from acquisitions

     626        592   

Other than temporary impairment on securities

     374        374   

Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale

     386        —     

Amortization of non-compete agreements

     18        19   

Other

     925        936   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     49,636        48,118   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Fixed assets

     350        409   

Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale

     —          1,858   

FHLB stock dividends

     1,276        1,276   

Originated mortgage servicing rights

     88        98   

Other

     516        549   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     2,230        4,190   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance

     47,406        43,928   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Valuation allowance

     (47,406     (43,928
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

   $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our estimate of the realizability of the deferred tax asset depends on our estimate of projected future levels of taxable income as all carryback ability was fully absorbed by our tax loss of approximately $40 million for 2011. In analyzing future taxable income levels, we considered all evidence currently available, both positive and negative. Based on our analysis, we continue to maintain a valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2013. Our deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance are analyzed and adjusted on a quarterly basis.

 

30


Table of Contents

The Company does not have any beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits. The Company does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months. There were no interest and penalties recorded in the income statement or accrued for the six months ended June 30, 2013 or the year ended December 31, 2012 related to unrecognized tax benefits.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax and the Company is subject to income tax in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2009.

Note 10 – Stock Plans and Stock Based Compensation

The Company has two stock incentive plans. On February 23, 2006, the Company adopted the Porter Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. In May 2013, the Board approved an amendment to the plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance by 800,000 shares. The 2006 Plan now permits the issuance of up to 1,263,050 shares of the Company’s common stock upon the exercise of stock options or upon the grant of stock awards. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had granted 268,634 unvested shares net of forfeitures and vesting under the stock incentive plan. Shares issued under the plan vest annually on the anniversary date of the grant over five to ten years. The Company has 868,293 shares remaining available for issue under the plan.

On May 15, 2006, the Board of Directors approved the Porter Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Directors Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, which was approved by holders of the Company’s voting common stock on June 8, 2006. On May 22, 2008, shareholders voted to amend the plan to change the form of incentive award from stock options to unvested shares. Under the terms of the plan, 100,000 shares are reserved for issuance to non-employee directors upon the exercise of stock options or upon the grant of unvested stock awards granted under the plan. Prior to the amendment, options were granted automatically under the plan at fair market value on the date of grant. The options vest over a three-year period and have a five year term. Unvested shares are granted automatically under the plan at fair market value on the date of grant and vest semi-annually on the anniversary date of the grant over three years.

On May 16, 2012, holders of the Company’s voting common stock voted to further amend the 2006 Non-Employee Directors Stock Ownership Incentive Plan to award restricted shares having a fair market value of $25,000 annually to each non-employee director, and to increase the number of shares issuable under the Directors’ Plan from 100,000 shares to 400,000 shares. Shares issued under the amended plan vest on December 31 in the year they are granted.

To date, the Company has issued 245,909 unvested shares to non-employee directors. At June 30, 2013, 113,357 shares remain available for issuance under this plan.

The fair value of the 2013 unvested shares issued to certain employees was $111,000, or $0.78 per weighted-average share. The fair value of the 2013 unvested shares issued to the directors was $155,000 or $0.85 per weighted average share. The Company recorded $226,000 and $215,000 of stock-based compensation during the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, to salaries and employee benefits. There was no significant impact on compensation expense resulting from forfeited or expiring shares. We expect substantially all of the unvested shares outstanding at the end of the period will vest according to the vesting schedule. No deferred tax benefit was recognized related to this expense for either period.

The following table summarizes unvested share activity as of and for the periods indicated for the Stock Incentive Plan:

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
     Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2012
 
     Shares     Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
     Shares     Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 

Outstanding, beginning

     153,316      $ 5.92         96,688      $ 13.40   

Granted

     142,663        0.78         97,197        1.74   

Vested

     (22,113     12.19         (27,362     13.04   

Forfeited

     (5,232     14.82         (13,207     15.22   
  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Outstanding, ending

     268,634      $ 2.50         153,316      $ 5.92   
  

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

31


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes unvested share activity as of and for the periods indicated for the Non-Employee Directors Stock Ownership Incentive Plan:

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
     Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2012
 
     Shares     Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
     Shares     Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
 

Outstanding, beginning

     80,078      $ 1.77         3,538      $ 7.91   

Granted

     182,355        0.85         93,943        1.65   

Vested

     (16,524     2.02         (17,403     2.37   

Forfeited

     —          —           —          —     
  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Outstanding, ending

     245,909      $ 1.07         80,078      $ 1.77   
  

 

 

      

 

 

   

As of June 30, 2013, all stock options issued to non-employee directors had expired and none were exercised during their grant term. The Company’s stock-based incentive awards have exclusively been restricted stock grants since 2008.

The following table summarizes stock option activity:

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
     Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2012
 
            Weighted            Weighted  
            Average            Average  
            Exercise            Exercise  
     Shares      Price      Shares     Price  

Outstanding, beginning

     —         $ —           29,530      $ 19.88   

Forfeited

     —           —           —          —     

Expired

     —           —           (29,530     19.88   
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

Outstanding, ending

     —         $ —           —        $ —     
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

No options were issued, outstanding, or exercised during the first six months of 2013. The Company recorded no stock option compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2013. No options were modified during the period. As of June 30, 2013, no stock options issued by the Company had been exercised, and all granted options had expired.

Unrecognized stock based compensation expense related to unvested shares for the remainder of 2013 and beyond are estimated as follows (in thousands):

 

July 2013 – December 2013

   $     340   

2014

     313   

2015

     174   

2016

     77   

2017 & thereafter

     44   

 

32


Table of Contents

Note 11 – Earnings (Loss) per Share

The factors used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations follow:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2012     2013     2012  
     (in thousands, except share and per share data)  

Net income (loss)

   $ (1,309   $ 151      $ (1,378   $ 1,653   

Less:

        

Preferred stock dividends

     437        438        875        875   

Accretion of Series A preferred stock discount

     45        45        90        90   

Earnings (loss) allocated to unvested shares

     (62     (4     (69     8   

Earnings (loss) allocated to Series C preferred

     (48     (9     (62     19   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders, basic and diluted

   $ (1,681   $ (319   $ (2,212   $ 661   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic

        

Weighted average common shares including unvested common shares outstanding

     12,528,932        12,195,232        12,501,854        12,175,850   

Less: Weighted average unvested common shares

     434,250        129,182        367,297        141,301   

Less: Weighted average Series C preferred

     332,894        332,894        332,894        332,894   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     11,761,788        11,733,156        11,801,663        11,701,655   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

   $ (0.14   $ (0.03   $ (0.19   $ 0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

        

Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of common and Preferred Series C stock warrants

     —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares and potential common shares

     11,761,788        11,733,156        11,801,663        11,701,655   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

   $ (0.14   $ (0.03   $ (0.19   $ 0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company had no outstanding stock options at June 30, 2013. A warrant for the purchase of 330,561 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $15.88 was outstanding at June 30, 2013 and 2012 but was not included in the diluted EPS computation as inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Finally, warrants for the purchase of 1,380,437 shares of non-voting common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share were outstanding at June 30, 2013 and 2012, but were not included in the diluted EPS computation as inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Note 12 – Capital Requirements and Restrictions on Retained Earnings

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can result in regulatory action.

On June 24, 2011, PBI Bank entered into a Consent Order with the FDIC and the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions. The consent order required the Bank to complete a management study, to maintain Tier 1 capital as a percentage of total assets of at least 9% and a total risk based capital ratio of at least 12%, to develop a plan to reduce our risk position in each substandard asset in excess of $1 million, to complete board review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses prior to quarterly Call Report submissions, to adopt procedures which strengthen the loan review function and ensure timely and accurate grading of credit relationships, to charge-off all assets classified as loss, to develop a plan to reduce concentrations of construction and development loans to not more than 75% of total risk based capital and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans to not more than 250% of total risk based capital, to limit asset growth to no more than 5% in any quarter or 10% annually, to not extend additional credit to any borrower classified substandard without specific board authorization, and to not declare or pay any dividend without the prior consent of our regulators. We are also restricted from accepting, renewing, or rolling-over brokered deposits without the prior receipt of a waiver on a case-by-case basis from our regulators.

 

33


Table of Contents

On September 21, 2011, we entered into a Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Pursuant to the Agreement, we made formal commitments to use our financial and management resources to serve as a source of strength for the Bank and to assist the Bank in addressing weaknesses identified by the FDIC and the KDFI, to pay no dividends without prior written approval, to pay no interest or principal on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without prior written approval, and to submit an acceptable plan to maintain sufficient capital.

In October 2012, PBI Bank entered into a new consent order with the FDIC and KDFI. The new consent order requires the Bank to maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9% and a minimum total risk based capital ratio of 12%. The Bank also agreed that if it should be unable to reach the required capital levels, and if directed in writing by the FDIC, then the Bank would within 30 days develop, adopt and implement a written plan to sell or merge itself into another federally insured financial institution or otherwise immediately obtain a sufficient capital investment into the Bank to fully meet the capital requirements. We expect to continue to work with our regulators toward capital ratio compliance as outlined in the written capital plan previously submitted by the Bank. The new consent order also requires the Bank to continue to adhere to the plans implemented in response to the June 2011 consent order, and includes the substantive provisions of the June 2011 consent order.

The following table shows the ratios of Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-adjusted assets and the leverage ratios for Porter Bancorp, Inc. and PBI Bank at the dates indicated:

 

                       June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  
     Regulatory
Minimums
    Well-Capitalized
Minimums
    Minimum Capital
Ratios Under
Consent Order
    Porter
Bancorp
    PBI
Bank
    Porter
Bancorp
    PBI
Bank
 

Tier 1 Capital

     4.0     6.0     N/A        6.88     8.47     6.46     7.71

Total risk-based capital

     8.0        10.0        12.0     10.46        10.60        9.81        9.82   

Tier 1 leverage ratio

     4.0        5.0        9.0        4.91        6.08        4.50        5.37   

At June 30, 2013, PBI Bank’s Tier 1 leverage ratio was 6.08%, which is below the 9% minimum capital ratio required by the Consent Order, and its total risk-based capital ratio was 10.60%, which is below the 12% minimum capital ratio required by the Consent Order. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition.

Kentucky banking laws limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to a holding company by its subsidiary banks without prior approval. These laws limit the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year to current year’s net income, as defined in the laws, combined with the retained net income of the preceding two years, less any dividends declared during those periods. PBI Bank has agreed with its primary regulators to obtain their written consent prior to declaring or paying any future dividends. As a practical matter, PBI Bank cannot pay dividends to Porter Bancorp for the foreseeable future.

Note 13 – Contingencies

In the normal course of operations, we are defendants in various legal proceedings. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur. We record contingent liabilities resulting from claims against us when a loss is assessed to be probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Assessing probability of loss and estimating probable losses requires analysis of multiple factors, including in some cases judgments about the potential actions of third party claimants and courts. Recorded contingent liabilities are based on the best information available and actual losses in any future period are inherently uncertain. Currently, we have accrued approximately $1.7 million related to ongoing litigation matters for which we believe liability is probable and reasonably estimable. Accruals are not made in cases where liability is not probable or the amount cannot be reasonably estimated. We provide disclosure of matters where we believe liability is reasonably possible and which may be material to our consolidated financial statements.

Signature Point Litigation. As disclosed previously, on June 18, 2010, three real estate development companies filed suit in Kentucky state court against PBI Bank and Managed Assets of Kentucky (“MAKY”). Signature Point Condominiums LLC, et al. v. PBI Bank, et al., Jefferson Circuit Court, Case No 10-CI-04295. On July 16, 2013, a jury in Louisville, Kentucky returned a verdict against PBI Bank, awarding the plaintiffs compensatory damages of $1,515,000 and punitive damages of $5,500,000. The case arose from a settlement in which PBI Bank agreed to release the plaintiffs and guarantors from obligations of more than $26 million related to a real estate project in Louisville. The plaintiffs were granted a right of first refusal to repurchase a tract of land within the project. In exchange, the plaintiffs conveyed the real estate securing the loans to PBI Bank. After plaintiffs declined to exercise their right of first refusal, PBI Bank sold the tract to the third party. Plaintiffs alleged that the Bank had knowledge of the third party offer before the conveyance of the land by the Plaintiffs to the Bank. Plaintiffs asserted claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference with prospective business advantage and conspiracy to commit fraud, negligence, and conspiracy against PBI Bank.

 

34


Table of Contents

After conferring with its legal advisors, PBI Bank believes the findings and damages are excessive and contrary to law, and that it has meritorious grounds to seek reconsideration of the verdict and to appeal. PBI Bank intends to file motions to reduce or overturn the award and otherwise for reconsideration of the case. We will continue to defend this matter vigorously. Although we have made provisions in our condensed consolidated financial statements for this self-insured matter, the amount of our legal reserve is less than the original amount of the damages awarded, plus accrued interest. The ultimate outcome of this matter could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

SBAV LP Litigation. In 2010, the Company sold common shares, convertible preferred shares and warrants to purchase common shares to accredited investors for $32 million in a private placement. In the placement, SBAV LP, an affiliate of Clinton Group, Inc. (“CGI”) purchased common shares and warrants for $5,000,016.

On July 11, 2011, CGI sent a letter to the Company, which was also attached as an exhibit to a Schedule 13D CGI filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the same date. In its letter CGI questioned the Company’s executive leadership team’s ability to properly manage the Bank’s operations, compliance with GAAP, financial disclosures and relationships with regulators, referencing the consent order PBI Bank entered into with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions on June 24, 2011. CGI also stated its belief “that it is likely that a number of representations and warranties made when the CGI affiliate entered into an agreement to purchase shares were false,” and demanded that the Company take immediate steps to “redress such breaches and make CGI and the other purchasers whole.”

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company’s Risk Policy and Oversight Committee, comprised of independent directors, undertook an investigation of the allegations raised in the CGI 13D to evaluate their merit and to ascertain the reasonableness of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses and OREO valuations at the time of Clinton’s investment. The Oversight Committee reported its conclusions to the Company’s Board of Directors in October 2011. While recognizing that opportunities for procedural improvements existed in the Bank’s lending and non-performing asset administration, the Oversight Committee concluded that this did not rise to a level that would result in the financial statements, or representations and warranties with respect to the financial statements, being misleading to investors in the 2010 private placement offering of the Company’s stock. The Oversight Committee further concluded that investors were afforded ample opportunity and access to information for their due diligence, including documentation involving asset valuation estimates, on-site management discussions and additional inquiries during visits to the Company headquarters, and access to loan files of their choosing and the appraisals contained therein, and that the Company’s disclosures were adequate in all material respects.

On January 30, 2012, CGI delivered a demand to inspect the Company’s records pursuant to the Kentucky Business Corporation Act. The Company provided records to CGI in accordance with Kentucky law.

On December 17, 2012, SBAV LP filed a lawsuit against Porter Bancorp, PBI Bank, J. Chester Porter and Maria L. Bouvette in New York state court. The proceeding was removed to New York federal district court on January 16, 2013. SBAV LP v. Porter Bancorp, et. al., Civ. Action 1:13 CV-0372 (S.D.N.Y). The complaint alleges violation of the Kentucky Securities Act, negligent misrepresentation and, against defendants Porter Bancorp and Bouvette, breach of contract. The plaintiff seeks damages in an amount in excess of $4,500,000, or the difference between the $5,000,016 purchase price and the value of the securities when sold by the plaintiff, plus interest at the applicable statutory rate, costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. On July 10, 2013, the New York federal district court granted the defendants’ motion to transfer the case to federal district court in Kentucky. SBAV LP v. Porter Bancorp, et. al. Civ. Action 3:13-CV-710 (W.D.Ky.) We dispute the material factual allegations made in the complaint and intend to defend the plaintiff’s claims vigorously. We have not accrued liability related to this matter as we believe we have meritorious defenses.

Miller Health Systems Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan Regulatory Review. Since 2007, PBI Bank has served as trustee for Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) purchase transactions. These transactions are subject to regular and routine reviews by the United States Department of Labor (DOL) for compliance with ERISA. Failure to fulfill our fiduciary duties under ERISA with respect to any such plan would subject us to certain financial risks such as claims for damages as well as fines and penalties assessable under ERISA.

In 2007, we served as Trustee in the Miller Health Systems, Inc. ESOP transaction. This transaction is under review by the United States Department of Labor (DOL) for compliance with ERISA. The DOL has alleged apparent violations of ERISA in this transaction. While there is no litigation at this time, the ultimate outcome of this matter could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We have not recorded accruals for this matter as we believe we fulfilled our fiduciary duties under ERISA and that liability is not probable nor can the amount be reasonably estimated.

 

35


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This item analyzes our financial condition, change in financial condition and results of operations. It should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes presented in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains statements about the future expectations, activities and events that constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements express our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future financial and operating performance and growth plans, taking into account information currently available to us. These statements are not statements of historical fact. The words “believe,” “may,” “should,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “objective,” “seek,” “plan,” “strive” or similar words, or the negatives of these words, identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations of future results we expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties can be difficult to predict and may be out of our control. Factors that could contribute to differences in our results include, but are not limited to the following:

 

 

 

Our inability to increase our capital to the levels required by our agreements with bank regulators could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

 

 

A significant percentage of our loan portfolio is comprised of non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, real estate construction and development loans, and multi-family residential real estate loans, all of which carry a higher degree of risk.

 

 

 

We continue to hold and acquire a significant amount of OREO properties, which could increase operating expenses and result in future losses.

 

 

 

Our decisions regarding credit risk may not be accurate, and our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual losses.

 

 

 

Our ability to pay cash dividends on our common and preferred stock and pay interest on the junior subordinated debentures that relate to our trust preferred securities is currently restricted. Our inability to resume paying dividends and interest on these securities may adversely affect our common shareholders.

We also refer you to Part II, Item 1A – Risk Factors in this report and to the risks identified and the cautionary statements discussed in greater detail in our December 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

36


Table of Contents

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. The Company believes it has chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable. We caution you however, that assumptions or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumptions or bases and actual results can be material. The forward-looking statements included in this report speak only as of the date of the report. We have no duty, and do not intend to, update these statements unless applicable laws require us to do so.

Overview

Porter Bancorp, Inc. is a Louisville, Kentucky-based bank holding company which operates 18 full-service banking offices in twelve counties through its wholly-owned subsidiary, PBI Bank. Our markets include metropolitan Louisville in Jefferson County and the surrounding counties of Henry and Bullitt, and extend south along the Interstate 65 corridor to Tennessee. We serve south central Kentucky and southern Kentucky from banking offices in Butler, Green, Hart, Edmonson, Barren, Warren, Ohio and Daviess Counties. We also have an office in Lexington, the second largest city in Kentucky. The Bank is a traditional community bank with a wide range of commercial and personal banking products, with an online banking division which delivers competitive deposit products and services under the separate brand of Ascencia.

The Company reported net loss of $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with net income of $151,000 and $1.7 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2012. After deductions for dividends on preferred stock, accretion on preferred stock, and loss allocated to participating securities, net loss to common shareholders was $1.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with net loss to common shareholders of $319,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and net income to common shareholders of $661,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share were ($0.14) and ($0.19) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with basic and diluted income (loss) per common share of ($0.03) and $0.06 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

The following significant developments occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2013:

 

 

 

No provision for loan losses expense was recorded for the second quarter of 2013, and expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $450,000, compared with $4.0 million and $7.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction in the loan portfolio size, a decline in loans migrating downward in risk grade classification, and stable collateral values for collateral dependent loans. Net charge-offs of $2.3 million were recognized for the second quarter, and total net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $19.6 million.

 

 

 

Net interest margin decreased 25 basis points to 3.15% in the first six months of 2013 compared with 3.40% in the first six months of 2012. The decrease in margin between periods was primarily due to a reduction in interest earning assets coupled with lower rates on those assets and elevated non-accrual loan levels. Average loans decreased 23.6% to $839.5 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $1.1 billion in the first six months of 2012. Net loans decreased 25.5% to $737.2 million at June 30, 2013, compared with $989.3 million at June 30, 2012.

 

 

 

We continued to execute on our strategy to reduce our commercial real estate and construction and development loans. Construction and development loans totaled $58.0 million, or 70% of total risk-based capital, at June 30, 2013 compared with $70.3 million, or 82% of total risk-based capital, at December 31, 2012. Non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, construction and development loans, and multi-family residential real estate loans as a group totaled $270.8 million, or 325% of total risk-based capital, at June 30, 2013 compared with $311.1 million, or 362% of total risk-based capital, at December 31, 2012.

 

 

 

Loan proceeds received from the repayment of our commercial real estate and construction and development loans were used primarily to redeem maturing certificates of deposit during the quarter. Deposits decreased 7.9% to $980.8 million compared with $1.0 billion at December 31, 2012. Certificate of deposit balances declined $70.0 million during the first six months of 2013 to $690.6 million at June 30, 2013, from $760.6 million at December 31, 2012. Demand deposits decreased 7.0% during the first six months of 2013 compared with December 31, 2012.

 

 

 

Non-performing loans increased $17.7 million to $112.3 million at June 30, 2013, compared with $94.6 million at December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to the placement of two significant borrowing relationships on non-accrual during the first quarter. At December 31, 2012, one of these relationships was past due 30-59 days and totaled $23.5 million; the other was past due 60-89 days and totaled $12.7 million. The increase in non-performing loans was partially offset by net loan charge-offs in the first six months of 2013 which totaled $19.6 million. The elevated level of charge-offs resulted primarily from charging off specific reserves for loans that were deemed to be collateral dependent, in accordance with regulatory guidance.

 

37


Table of Contents
 

 

Loans past due 30-59 days decreased from $38.2 million at December 31, 2012 to $8.6 million at June 30, 2013 and loans past due 60-89 days decreased from $20.3 million at December 31, 2012 to $3.0 million at June 30, 2013.

 

 

 

Foreclosed properties were $47.0 million at June 30, 2013, compared with $43.7 million at December 31, 2012, and $54.4 million at June 30, 2012. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company acquired $11.9 million and sold $8.1 million of other real estate owned (“OREO”). In addition, we recorded fair value write-downs of $977,000 during the second quarter reflecting declines in appraisal valuations and changes in pricing strategies. Our ratio of non-performing assets to total assets increased to 14.86% at June 30, 2013, compared with 11.89% at December 31, 2012, and 10.20% at June 30, 2012.

 

38


Table of Contents

Regulatory Matters

Since June 2011, the Bank has operated under the terms of a Consent Order with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions (“KDFI”). The Bank agreed, among other things, to improve asset quality, reduce loan concentrations, and maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9% and a minimum total risk based capital ratio of 12%. In September 2012, the Bank also agreed that if it should be unable to reach the required capital levels, and if directed in writing by the FDIC, then the Bank would within 30 days develop, adopt and implement a written plan to sell or merge itself into another federally insured financial institution or otherwise immediately obtain a sufficient capital investment into the Bank to fully meet the capital requirements. As of June 30, 2013, the Bank had not met the capital ratios required by the Consent Order. Our current Consent Order was included in our Current Reports on 8-K filed on September 25, 2012.

The Board of Directors and management continue to evaluate and implement strategies to meet the obligations of the Consent Order. These include:

 

 

Engaging a financial advisor to assist our Board in evaluating options to increase capital through the sale of common stock and to redeem the preferred stock we issued to the US Treasury in 2008 under its Capital Purchase Program.

 

 

Continuing with succession planning and adding resources to the management team. In 2012, John T. Taylor was named President and CEO of PBI Bank, and John R. Davis was appointed the Bank’s Chief Credit Officer of PBI Bank, with responsibility for establishing and executing the credit quality policies and overseeing credit administration for the entire organization. Mr. Taylor was also recently named to succeed as Maria L. Bouvette as CEO of Porter Bancorp, pending regulatory approval, following Ms. Bouvette’s retirement effective July 31, 2013.

 

 

Evaluating our internal processes and procedures, distribution of labor, and work-flow to ensure we have adequately and appropriately deployed resources in an efficient manner in the current environment. To this end, we believe the opportunity exists to centralize key processes which will lead to improved execution and cost savings.

 

 

Executing on our commitment to improve credit quality and reduce loan concentrations and balance sheet risk.

 

 

 

We have reduced our loan portfolio significantly from $1.3 billion at December 31, 2010, to $774.8 million at June 30, 2013.

 

 

 

We have reduced our construction and development loans to less than 75% of total risk-based capital at June 30, 2013, and are now in compliance with the Consent Order.

 

 

 

We continue to make progress in reducing our non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, construction and development loans, and multi-family residential real estate loans as a group. These loans represented 325% of total risk-based capital at June 30, 2013, down from 362% at December 31, 2012. Our Consent Order calls for us to reduce this concentration to not more than 250% of total risk-based capital.

 

 

 

We have curtailed new construction and development lending and new non-owner occupied commercial real estate lending. Outstanding principal balances have also declined due to amortizing credits and pay-downs from borrowers who sell properties built for resale.

 

 

Executing on our commitment to sell OREO in order to reinvest in quality, income-producing assets.

 

39


Table of Contents
 

 

Our acquisition of real estate assets through the loan remediation process slowed during the first six months of 2013, when we acquired $15.6 million of OREO. However, nonaccrual loans totaled $112.2 million at June 30, 2013, and we expect to resolve many of these loans by foreclosure, which could result in further additions to our OREO portfolio.

 

 

 

 

We incurred OREO losses totaling $1.6 million during the first six months of 2013, comprised of $359,000 in loss on sale and $1.3 million in fair value write-downs to reflect declines in appraisal valuations and changes in our pricing strategies.

 

 

 

We continually evaluate opportunities to maximize the value we receive from the sale of OREO. We pursue multiple sales channels through internal marketing and the use of brokers, auctions, technology sales platforms, and bulk sale strategies.

 

 

 

As we reduced our construction, development and other land loans during the past six months, the composition of our OREO portfolio shifted toward commercial real estate and 1-4 family residential properties, which we have found to be more liquid than construction, development, and land assets. Commercial real estate represents 39% of the portfolio at June 30, 2013 compared with 35% at December 31, 2012. 1-4 family residential properties represent 15% of the portfolio at June 30, 2013 compared with 12% at December 31, 2012.

 

 

Evaluating other strategic alternatives, such as the sale of assets or branches.

Bank regulatory agencies can exercise discretion when an institution does not meet the terms of a consent order. Based on individual circumstances, the agencies may issue mandatory directives, impose monetary penalties, initiate changes in management, or take more serious adverse actions.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

We continually review our accounting policies and financial information disclosures. A summary of our more significant accounting policies that require the use of estimates and judgments in preparing the financial statements was provided in “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2012. Management has discussed the development, selection, and application of our critical accounting policies with our Audit Committee. During the first six months of 2013, there were no material changes in the critical accounting policies and assumptions.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes components of income and expense and the change in those components for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared with the same period of 2012:

 

     For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
     Change from
Prior Period
 
     2013     2012      Amount     Percent  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Gross interest income

   $ 11,168      $ 14,812       $ (3,644     (24.6 )%

Gross interest expense

     2,816        4,017         (1,201     (29.9 )

Net interest income

     8,352        10,795         (2,443     (22.6

Provision for loan losses

     —          4,000         (4,000     (100.0

Non-interest income

     2,148        3,018         (870     (28.8

Non-interest expense

     11,809        9,662         2,147        22.2   

Net income (loss) before taxes

     (1,309     151         (1,460 )     (966.9

Income tax expense (benefit)

     —          —           —          —     

Net income (loss)

     (1,309     151         (1,460 )     (966.9

Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $1.5 million to a net loss of $1.3 million, compared with net income of $151,000 for the comparable period of 2012. Provision for loan losses expense decreased $4.0 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared with the same period in 2012. This decrease in provision expense is primarily attributable to the reduction in the loan portfolio size, the lower pace of loans migrating downward in risk grade classification, and more stable collateral values for collateral dependent loans. Net charge-offs of $2.3 million were recognized for the second quarter. Those charge-offs were primarily the result of charging off specific reserves for loans that were deemed to be collateral dependent in accordance with regulatory guidance. Net interest income decreased $2.4 million from the 2012 second quarter due to an 11 basis point decline in net interest margin due to lower earning asset levels and lower average rates on earning assets. In addition, net interest income and net interest margin were adversely affected by $1.5 million and $1.3 million of interest lost on nonaccrual loans in the second quarters of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

40


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes components of income and expense and the change in those components for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with the same period of 2012:

 

     For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
     Change from
Prior Period
 
     2013     2012      Amount     Percent  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Gross interest income

   $ 22,426      $ 30,567       $ (8,141     (26.6 )%

Gross interest expense

     5,776        8,318         (2,542     (30.6 )

Net interest income

     16,650        22,249         (5,599     (25.2

Provision for loan losses

     450        7,750         (7,300     (94.2

Non-interest income

     3,795        6,463         (2,668     (41.3

Non-interest expense

     21,373        19,309         2,064        10.7   

Net income (loss) before taxes

     (1,378     1,653         (3,031     (183.4

Income tax expense (benefit)

     —          —           —          —     

Net income (loss)

     (1,378     1,653         (3,031     (183.4

 

41


Table of Contents

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $3.0 million to a net loss of $1.4 million, compared with net income of $1.7 million for the comparable period of 2012. Provision for loan losses expense decreased $7.3 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with the same period in 2012. This decrease in provision expense is primarily attributable to the reduction in the loan portfolio size, the lower pace of loans migrating downward in risk grade classification, and more stable collateral values for collateral dependent loans. Net charge-offs of $19.6 million were recognized for the first six months of 2013. Those charge-offs were primarily the result of charging off specific reserves for loans that were deemed to be collateral dependent in accordance with regulatory guidance. Net interest income decreased $5.6 million from the first six months of 2012 due to a 25 basis point decline in net interest margin due to lower earning asset levels and lower average rates on earning assets. In addition, net interest income and net interest margin were adversely affected by $3.0 million and $2.1 million of interest lost on nonaccrual loans in the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Net Interest Income – Our net interest income was $8.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 22.6%, compared with $10.8 million for the same period in 2012. Net interest spread and margin were 3.11% and 3.24%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2013, compared with 3.20% and 3.35%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2012. Net average non-accrual loans were $115.4 million and $91.6 million for the second quarters of 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net interest income was $16.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $5.6 million, or 25.2%, compared with $22.2 million for the same period of 2012. Net interest spread and margin were 3.02% and 3.15%, respectively, for the first six months of 2013, compared with 3.25% and 3.40%, respectively, for the first six months of 2012. Net average non-accrual loans were $112.3 million and $91.1 million in the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Average loans receivable declined approximately $271.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared with the second quarter of 2012. This resulted in a decline in interest revenue of approximately $3.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared with the prior year period. Average loans receivable declined approximately $259.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the first six months of 2012. This resulted in a decline in interest revenue of approximately $6.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the prior year period. The decline in loan volume is attributable to our efforts to reduce concentrations in our construction and development loan portfolio and our non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan portfolio, as well as soft loan demand in our markets.

Net interest margin decreased 11 basis points from our margin of 3.35% in the prior year second quarter. The yield on earning assets declined 28 basis points from the second quarter of 2012, compared with a 19 basis point decline in rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. This resulted in a net $2.4 million reduction in net interest income. Net interest margin for the first six months of 2013 decreased 25 basis points from our margin of 3.40% in the first half of 2012 due primarily to lower average earning assets relative to average interest bearing liabilities. The yield on earning assets declined 43 basis points from the first six months of 2012, compared with a 20 basis point decline in rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

Net interest margin for the second quarter of 2013 increased 17 basis points from our margin of 3.07% in the first quarter of 2013, due primarily to higher yield on loans, countered by lower average loan receivables and lower yield on investment securities. Average loan receivables declined $65.6 million from the first quarter of 2013, due to our efforts to reduce concentrations in our construction and development loan portfolio and in our non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan portfolio, and increased charge-offs. Yield on loans was adversely affected by an increase in foregone interest on non-accrual loans. Interest foregone on non-accrual loans totaled $1.5 million in the second quarter of 2013, compared with $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2013, and $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2012. The decrease in yield on investment securities was the result of our reinvestment of scheduled principal and interest payment proceeds into lower-yielding securities. Yield on average earning assets for the second quarter of 2013 increased 16 basis points from 4.15% in the first quarter of 2013, compared with a 2 basis points decrease in rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities from 1.22% in the first quarter of 2013.

 

42


Table of Contents

Average Balance Sheets

The following table presents the average balance sheets for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, along with the related calculations of tax-equivalent net interest income, net interest margin and net interest spread for the related periods.

 

     Three Months Ended June 30,  
     2013     2012  
     Average
Balance
    Interest
Earned/
Paid
     Average
Yield/
Cost
    Average
Balance
    Interest
Earned/
Paid
     Average
Yield/
Cost
 
     (dollars in thousands)  

ASSETS

              

Interest-earning assets:

              

Loan receivables (1)(2)

   $ 806,941      $ 9,954         4.95   $ 1,078,497      $ 13,689         5.10

Securities

              

Taxable

     145,909        833         2.29        149,482        783         2.11   

Tax-exempt (3)

     29,896        231         4.77        22,977        196         5.28   

FHLB stock

     10,072        105         4.18        10,072        107         4.27   

Other equity securities

     1,305        15         4.61        1,359        14         4.14   

Federal funds sold and other

     56,392        30         0.21        45,133        23         0.20   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-earning assets

     1,050,515        11,168         4.31     1,307,520        14,812         4.59
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Less: Allowance for loan losses

     (39,255          (53,546     

Non-interest earning assets

     93,547             109,366        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total assets

   $ 1,104,807           $ 1,363,340        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

              

Interest-bearing liabilities:

              

Certificates of deposit and other time deposits

   $ 714,091      $ 2,400         1.35   $ 930,012      $ 3,517         1.52

NOW and money market deposits

     146,477        129         0.35        149,174        169         0.46   

Savings accounts

     41,090        31         0.30        39,181        40         0.41   

Repurchase agreements

     2,749        2         0.29        2,121        2         0.38   

FHLB advances

     5,128        41         3.21        6,538        54         3.32   

Junior subordinated debentures

     31,524        213         2.71        32,421        235         2.92   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     941,059        2,816         1.20     1,159,447        4,017         1.39
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:

              

Non-interest-bearing deposits

     106,444             112,914        

Other liabilities

     10,400             6,992        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total liabilities

     1,057,903             1,279,353        

Stockholders’ equity

     46,904             83,987        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 1,104,807           $ 1,363,340        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Net interest income

     $ 8,352           $ 10,795      
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Net interest spread

          3.11          3.20
       

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net interest margin

          3.24          3.35
       

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes loan fees in both interest income and the calculation of yield on loans.

(2)

Calculations include non-accruing loans averaging $115.4 and $91.6 million, respectively, in average loan amounts outstanding.

(3)

Taxable equivalent yields are calculated assuming a 35% federal income tax rate.

 

43


Table of Contents

The following table presents the average balance sheets for the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, along with the related calculations of tax-equivalent net interest income, net interest margin and net interest spread for the related periods.

 

     Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2013     2012  
     Average
Balance
    Interest
Earned/
Paid
     Average
Yield/
Cost
    Average
Balance
    Interest
Earned/
Paid
     Average
Yield/
Cost
 
     (dollars in thousands)  

ASSETS

              

Interest-earning assets:

              

Loan receivables (1)(2)

   $ 839,542      $ 19,987         4.80   $ 1,098,839      $ 28,201         5.16

Securities

              

Taxable

     145,542        1,685         2.33        137,492        1,609         2.35   

Tax-exempt (3)

     29,187        452         4.80        25,040        446         5.51   

FHLB stock

     10,072        213         4.26        10,072        221         4.41   

Other equity securities

     1,332        30         4.54        1,359        29         4.29   

Federal funds sold and other

     55,149        59         0.22        56,397        61         0.22   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-earning assets

     1,080,824        22,426         4.23     1,329,199        30,567         4.66
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Less: Allowance for loan losses

     (47,253          (53,220     

Non-interest earning assets

     94,611             111,994        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total assets

   $ 1,128,182           $ 1,387,973        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

              

Interest-bearing liabilities:

              

Certificates of deposit and other time deposits

   $ 731,863      $ 4,937         1.36   $ 953,230      $ 7,289         1.54

NOW and money market deposits

     149,981        262         0.35        151,136        355         0.47   

Savings accounts

     40,742        65         0.32        38,133        82         0.43   

Repurchase agreements

     2,658        3         0.23        1,897        4         0.42   

FHLB advances

     5,275        84         3.21        6,722        111         3.32   

Junior subordinated debentures

     31,634        425         2.71        32,533        477         2.95   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     962,153        5,776         1.21     1,183,651        8,318         1.41
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:

              

Non-interest-bearing deposits

     108,281             112,785        

Other liabilities

     10,424             7,214        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total liabilities

     1,080,858             1,303,650        

Stockholders’ equity

     47,324             84,323        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 1,128,182           $ 1,387,973        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Net interest income

     $ 16,650           $ 22,249      
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Net interest spread

          3.02          3.25
       

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net interest margin

          3.15          3.40
       

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes loan fees in both interest income and the calculation of yield on loans.

(2)

Calculations include non-accruing loans averaging $112.3 and $91.1 million, respectively, in average loan amounts outstanding.

(3)

Taxable equivalent yields are calculated assuming a 35% federal income tax rate.

 

44


Table of Contents

Rate/Volume Analysis

The table below sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old volume); (2) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by old rate); and (3) changes in rate-volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume). Changes in rate-volume are proportionately allocated between rate and volume variance.

 

     Three Months Ended June 30,
2013 vs. 2012
    Six Months Ended June 30
2013 vs. 2012
 
     Increase (decrease)
due to change in
    Increase (decrease)
due to change in
 
     Rate     Volume     Net
Change
    Rate     Volume     Net
Change
 
     (in thousands)  

Interest-earning assets:

            

Loan receivables

   $ (375   $ (3,360   $ (3,735   $ (1,928   $ (6,286   $ (8,214

Securities

     66        19        85        (69     151        82   

FHLB stock

     (2 )     —          (2     (8     —          (8

Other equity securities

     2        (1     1        2        (1     1   

Federal funds sold and other

     1        6        7        (1     (1     (2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total increase (decrease) in interest income

     (308     (3,336     (3,644     (2,004     (6,137     (8,141
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

            

Certificates of deposit and other time deposits

     (362     (755     (1,117     (792     (1,560     (2,352

NOW and money market accounts

     (37     (3     (40     (90     (3     (93

Savings accounts

     (11     2        (9     (23     6        (17

Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements

     —          —          —          (3     2        (1

FHLB advances

     (2     (11     (13     (4     (23     (27

Junior subordinated debentures

     (15     (7     (22     (39     (13     (52
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total increase (decrease) in interest expense

     (427 )     (774     (1,201     (951     (1,591     (2,542
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in net interest income

   $ 119      $ (2,562   $ (2,443   $ (1,053   $ (4,546   $ (5,599
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-Interest Income – The following table presents the major categories of non-interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013:

 

     For the Three  Months
Ended June 30,
     For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
     2013      2012      2013      2012  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Service charges on deposit accounts

   $ 506       $ 556       $ 999       $ 1,110   

Income from fiduciary activities

     —           291         517         542   

Bank card interchange fees

     196         199         368         376   

Other real estate owned rental income

     230         24         342         62   

Gains on sales of investment securities, net

     703         1,511         703         3,530   

Income from bank owned life insurance

     305         79         384         158   

Other

     208         358         482         685   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

   $ 2,148       $ 3,018       $ 3,795       $ 6,463   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-interest income for the second quarter ended June 30, 2013 decreased by $870,000, or 28.8%, compared with the second quarter of 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, non-interest income decreased by $2.7 million, or 41.3% to $3.8 million compared with $6.5 million for the same period of 2012.

The decrease in non-interest income between the three month comparative periods was primarily due to a $808,000 reduction in gains on sales of investment securities, as well as lower income from fiduciary activities due to our efforts to transition away from non-traditional trust services, such as ESOP and employee benefit plan services, throughout our markets. These decreases were partially offset by increased other real estate owned rental income and income from bank owned life insurance. The decrease in non-interest income between the six month comparative periods was primarily due to a $2.8 million reduction in gains on sales of investment securities, partially offset by increased other real estate owned rental income and income from bank owned life insurance.

 

45


Table of Contents

Non-interest ExpenseThe following table presents the major categories of non-interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013:

 

     For the Three  Months
Ended June 30,
     For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
     2013      2012      2013      2012  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Salary and employee benefits

   $ 3,999       $ 3,982       $ 8,138       $ 8,294   

Occupancy and equipment

     913         969         1,844         1,855   

Other real estate owned expense

     1,657         1,205         2,448         2,462   

FDIC insurance

     650         832         1,289         1,705   

Loan collection expense

     2,407         586         3,442         946   

Professional fees

     499         567         905         923   

State franchise tax

     537         592         1,074         1,184   

Communications

     179         168         354         348   

Postage and delivery

     102         109         215         231   

Office supplies

     73         68         146         178   

Advertising

     57         28         116         61   

Insurance expense

     160         104         311         200   

Other

     576         452         1,091         922   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest expense

   $ 11,809       $ 9,662       $ 21,373       $ 19,309   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-interest expense for the second quarter ended June 30, 2013 increased $2.1 million, or 22.2%, compared with the second quarter of 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, non-interest expense increased $2.1 million, or 10.7% to $21.4 million compared with $19.3 million for the first six months of 2012. The increases in non-interest expense for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 were primarily attributable to higher loan collection and insurance expenses, as well as an increase in other real estate owned expense in the second quarter of 2013 due to increased valuation write-downs on OREO properties and property maintenance expense. These items were partially offset by reductions in FDIC insurance and state franchise tax.

Income Tax ExpenseNo income taxes were recorded for the first six months of 2013. The income tax effect on net loss before taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2013, increased our deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance by $3.5 million. See Footnote 9, “Income Taxes.”

Effective tax rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% applied to income before income taxes due to the following:

 

     For the Three  Months
Ended June 30,
    For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
     2013     2012     2013     2012  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Federal statutory rate times financial statement income

   $ (458 )   $ 53      $ (482   $ 579   

Effect of:

        

Valuation allowance

     554        35        677        (384

Tax-exempt income

     (79     (70     (158     (159

Non-taxable life insurance income

     (26     (26     (52     (52

Other, net

     9        8        15        16   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ —        $ —        $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

46


Table of Contents

Analysis of Financial Condition

Total assets decreased $90.5 million, or 7.8%, to $1.1 billion at June 30, 2013, from $1.2 billion at December 31, 2012. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $105.2 million in net loans, and was partially offset by increases of $14.7 million cash and cash equivalents. The decrease in net loans was due to loan payoffs outpacing loan funding and efforts to move impaired loans through the collection, foreclosure, and disposition process. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was due to cash inflows related to loan payments and maturities of securities.

Loans ReceivableLoans receivable decreased $124.3 million, or 13.8%, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $774.8 million. Our commercial, commercial real estate and real estate construction portfolios decreased by an aggregate of $88.2 million, or 16.7%, during the six months and comprised 56.6% of the total loan portfolio at June 30, 2013. The decline in loans receivable was attributable to net charge-offs of $19.6 million, transfers to OREO of $15.6 million, and loan payoffs outpacing loan funding by approximately $89.1 million.

Loan Portfolio CompositionThe following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio at the dates indicated, net of deferred loan fees, by type. There are no foreign loans in our portfolio. Except for commercial real estate and residential real estate, there is no concentration of loans in any industry exceeding 10% of total loans.

 

     As of June 30,
2013
    As of December 31,
2012
 
     Amount      Percent     Amount      Percent  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Commercial

   $ 51,079         6.60   $ 52,567         5.85

Commercial Real Estate

          

Construction

     57,951         7.48        70,284         7.82   

Farmland

     72,312         9.33        80,825         8.99   

Other

     256,859         33.15        322,687         35.89   

Residential Real Estate

          

Multi-family

     47,253         6.10        50,986         5.67   

1-4 Family

     247,248         31.91        278,273         30.95   

Consumer

     16,746         2.16        20,383         2.27   

Agriculture

     24,613         3.18        22,317         2.48   

Other

     724         0.09        770         0.08   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans

   $ 774,785         100.00   $ 899,092         100.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-Performing AssetsNon-performing assets consist of loans past due 90 days or more still on accrual, loans on which interest is no longer accrued, real estate acquired through foreclosure, and repossessed assets.

The following table sets forth information with respect to non-performing assets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

     June 30,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Loans past due 90 days or more still on accrual

   $ 71      $ 86   

Non-accrual loans

     112,185        94,517   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-performing loans

     112,256        94,603   

Real estate acquired through foreclosure

     47,030        43,671   

Other repossessed assets

     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-performing assets

   $ 159,286      $ 138,274   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-performing loans to total loans

     14.49     10.52
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-performing assets to total assets

     14.86     11.89
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for non-performing loans

   $ 7,368      $ 13,250   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for non-performing loans to non-performing loans

     6.56     14.01
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

47


Table of Contents

Nonperforming loans at June 30, 2013, were $112.3 million, or 14.49% of total loans, compared with $81.7 million, or 7.85% of total loans, at June 30, 2012, and $94.6 million, or 10.52% of total loans at December 31, 2012. The increase from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to loans for two significant borrowing relationships, which together totaled $36.2 million, being placed on non-accrual in the first quarter. At December 31, 2012, these relationships were past due 30-59 days and 60-89 days, respectively. The increase in non-accrual loans was partially offset by net loan charge-offs in the first six months of 2013 which totaled $19.6 million. These elevated charge-offs were primarily the result of charging off specific reserves for loans that were deemed to be collateral dependent, in accordance with regulatory guidance.

Loans past due 30-59 days decreased from $38.2 million at December 31, 2012 to $8.6 million at June 30, 2013. Loans past due 60-89 days decreased from $20.3 million at December 31, 2012 to $3.0 million at June 30, 2013. This represents a $46.9 million decrease from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013, in loans past due 30-89 days. These decreases were primarily in the 1-4 family residential real estate, and construction segments of the portfolio. We considered this trend in delinquency levels during the evaluation of qualitative trends in the portfolio when establishing the general component of our allowance for loan losses.

A troubled debt restructuring (TDR) occurs when the Company has agreed to a loan modification in the form of a concession for a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty. The majority of the Company’s TDRs involve a reduction in interest rate, a deferral of principal for a stated period of time, or an interest only period. All TDRs are considered impaired, and the Company has allocated reserves for these loans to reflect the present value of the concessionary terms granted to the customer. If the loan is considered collateral dependent, it is reported net of allocated reserves, at the fair value of the collateral.

We do not have a formal loan modification program. Rather, we work with individual customers on a case-by-case basis to facilitate the orderly collection of our principal and interest before a loan becomes a non-performing loan. If a customer is unable to make contractual payments, we review the particular circumstances of that customer’s situation and negotiate a revised payment stream. In other words, we identify performing customers experiencing financial difficulties, and through negotiations, we lower their interest rate, most typically on a short-term basis for three to six months. Our goal when restructuring a credit is to afford the customer a reasonable period of time to remedy the issue causing cash flow constraints within their business so that they can return to performing status over time.

Our loan modifications have taken the form of reduction in interest rate and/or curtailment of scheduled principal payments for a short-term period, usually three to six months, but in some cases until maturity of the loan. In some circumstances we restructure real estate secured loans in a bifurcated fashion whereby we have a fully amortizing “A” loan at a market interest rate and an interest-only “B” loan at a reduced interest rate. Our restructured loans are all collateral secured loans. If a customer fails to perform under the modified terms, we place the loan(s) on non-accrual status and begin the process of working with the customer to liquidate the underlying collateral to satisfy the debt.

At June 30, 2013, we had 119 restructured loans totaling $101.4 million with borrowers who experienced deterioration in financial condition compared with 123 loans totaling $117.8 million at December 31, 2012. In general, these loans were granted interest rate reductions to provide cash flow relief to customers experiencing cash flow difficulties. Of these loans, 7 loans totaling approximately $5.7 million were also granted principal payment deferrals until maturity. There were no concessions made to forgive principal relative to these loans, although we have recorded partial charge-offs for certain restructured loans. In general, these loans are secured by first liens on 1-4 residential or commercial real estate properties, or farmland. Restructured loans also include $3.1 million of commercial loans. At June 30, 2013, $54.9 million of our restructured loans were accruing and $46.5 million were on nonaccrual.

In accordance with current guidance, we continue to report restructured loans as restructured until such time as the loan is paid in full, otherwise settled, sold, or charged-off. If the customer fails to perform, we place the loan on non-accrual status and seek to liquidate the underlying collateral for these loans. Our non-accrual policy for restructured loans is identical to our non-accrual policy for all loans. Our policy calls for a loan to be reported as non-accrual if it is maintained on a cash basis because of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower, payment in full of principal and interest is not expected, or principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the assets are both well secured and in the process of collection. Changes in value for impairment, including the amount attributed to the passage of time, are recorded entirely within the provision for loan losses.

We consider any loan that is restructured for a borrower experiencing financial difficulties due to a borrower’s potential inability to pay in accordance with contractual terms to be a troubled debt restructure. Specifically, we consider a concession involving a modification of the loan terms, such as (i) a reduction of the stated interest rate, (ii) reduction or deferral of principal, or (iii) reduction or deferral of accrued interest at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk all to be troubled debt restructurings. When a modification of terms is made for a competitive reason, we do not consider that to be a troubled debt restructuring. A primary example of a competitive modification would be an interest rate reduction for a performing customer’s loan to a market rate as the result of a market decline in rates.

See Footnote 4, “Loans,” to the financial statements for additional disclosure related to troubled debt restructuring.

 

48


Table of Contents

Foreclosed Properties – Foreclosed properties at June 30, 2013 were $47.0 million compared with $54.4 million at June 30, 2012 and $43.7 million at December 31, 2012. See Footnote 5, “Other Real Estate Owned,” to the financial statements. During the first six months of 2013, we acquired $15.6 million of OREO properties, and sold properties totaling approximately $10.9 million. We value foreclosed properties at fair value less estimated costs to sell when acquired and expect to liquidate these properties to recover our investment in the due course of business.

Other real estate owned (OREO) is recorded at fair market value less estimated cost to sell at time of acquisition. Any write-down of the property at the time of acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent reductions in fair value are recorded as non-interest expense. To determine the fair value of OREO for smaller dollar single family homes, we consult with internal real estate sales staff and external realtors, investors, and appraisers. If the internally evaluated market price is below our underlying investment in the property, appropriate write-downs are recorded.

For larger dollar commercial real estate properties, we obtain a new appraisal of the subject property in connection with the transfer to OREO. In some of these circumstances, an appraisal is in process at quarter end and we must make our best estimate of the fair value of the underlying collateral based on our internal evaluation of the property, our review of the most recent appraisal, and discussions with the currently engaged appraiser. We typically obtain updated appraisals on the anniversary date of ownership unless a sale is imminent.

Net loss on sales, write-downs, and operating expenses for OREO totaled $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with $2.5 million for the same period of 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, fair value write-downs of $1.3 million were recorded to reflect declining values evidenced by new appraisals and our reduction of marketing prices in connection with our sales strategies.

Allowance for Loan LossesThe allowance for loan losses is based on management’s continuing review and evaluation of individual loans, loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various categories of loans and such other factors that, in management’s judgment, require current recognition in estimating loan losses.

Management has established loan grading procedures that result in specific allowance allocations for any estimated inherent risk of loss. For loans not individually evaluated, a general allowance allocation is computed using factors developed over time based on actual loss experience. The specific and general allocations plus consideration of qualitative factors represent management’s best estimate of probable losses contained in the loan portfolio at the evaluation date. Although the allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific and general allocations, the entire allowance is available to absorb any credit losses.

Our loan loss reserve, as a percentage of total loans at June 30, 2013, decreased to 4.85% from 4.96% at June 30, 2012, and from 6.30% at December 31, 2012. No provision for loan losses was recorded for the second quarter of 2013 compared with $4.0 million for the second quarter of 2012. Provision for loan losses decreased $7.3 million to $450,000 for the first six months of 2013 compared with $7.8 million for the first six months of 2012. The decrease in the second quarter was primarily attributable to the $124.3 million reduction in the loan portfolio size, net loan charge-offs of $2.3 million, the lower pace of loans migrating downward in risk grade classification, and more stable collateral values for collateral dependent loans.

Net loan charge-offs for the second quarter of 2013 were $2.3 million, or 0.28% of average loans, compared with $6.4 million, or 0.59% of average loans, for the second quarter of 2012, and $4.3 million, or 0.47% of average loans, for the fourth quarter of 2012. Net loan charge-offs for the first six months of 2013 were $19.6 million, or 2.33% of average loans, compared with $8.7 million, or 0.79% of average loans, for the first six months of 2013. Our allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 33.46% at June 30, 2013, compared with 59.91% at December 31, 2012, and 63.12% at June 30, 2012. Additionally, the elevated charge-offs in the first quarter of 2013 were primarily the result of charging off specific reserves for loans that were deemed to be collateral dependent during the quarter in accordance with regulatory guidance. The change in this metric between periods is attributable to the fluctuation in historical loss experience, qualitative factors, non-accrual loans, and provision expense.

The majority of our nonperforming loans are secured by real estate collateral and the underlying collateral coverage for nonperforming loans supports the likelihood of collection of our principal. We have assessed these loans for collectability and considered, among other things, the borrower’s ability to repay, the value of the underlying collateral, and other market conditions to ensure the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable incurred losses. Our allowance for non-performing loans to non-performing loans was 6.65% at June 30, 2013 compared with 14.42% at June 30, 2012, and 14.01% at December 31, 2012. The decline in this metric from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to charging off specific reserves for loans that were deemed to be collateral dependent during the quarter in accordance with regulatory guidance.

 

49


Table of Contents

An analysis of changes in the allowance for loan losses and selected ratios for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and for the year ended December 31, 2012 follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
    Year  Ended
December 31,
2012
 
     2013     2012     2013     2012    
     (in thousands)  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 39,839        53,953      $ 56,680      $ 52,579      $ 52,579   

Provision for loan losses

     —          4,000        450        7,750        40,250   

Recoveries

     1,124        79        1,795        285        1,366   

Charge-offs

     (3,404     (6,438     (21,366     (9,020     (37,515
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

     37,559        51,594        37,559        51,594        56,680   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans

     4.85     4.96     4.85     4.96     6.30
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net charge-offs to average loans

     0.28     0.59     2.33     0.79     3.50
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans

     33.46     63.12     33.46     63.12     59.91
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses for loans individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 10,190      $ 5,620      $ 10,190      $ 5,620      $ 21,034   

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

     175,038        175,650        175,038        175,650        188,808   

Allowance for loan losses to loans individually evaluated for impairment

     5.82     3.20     5.82     3.20     11.14

Allowance for loan losses for loans collectively evaluated for impairment

   $ 27,369      $ 45,974      $ 27,369      $ 45,974      $ 35,646   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     599,747        865,259        599,747        865,259        710,284   

Allowance for loan losses to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     4.56     5.31     4.56     5.31     5.02

 

50


Table of Contents

LiabilitiesTotal liabilities at June 30, 2013 were $1.0 billion compared with $1.1 billion at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $82.1 million, or 7.4%. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in deposits of $84.2 million, or 7.9%, to $980.8 million at June 30, 2013 from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2012. Certificate of deposit balances declined $70.0 million during the first six months of 2013 to $690.6 million at June 30, 2013 from $760.6 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease in deposits follows management’s strategy to match liability funding levels with lower loan balances.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased by $588,000, or 10.5%, to $5.0 million at June 30, 2013, from $5.6 million at December 31, 2012. These advances are used from time to time to fund asset growth and manage interest rate risk in accordance with our asset/liability management strategies.

Deposits are our primary source of funds. The following table sets forth the average daily balances and weighted average rates paid for our deposits for the periods indicated:

 

     For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
2013
    For the Year
Ended December 31,
2012
 
     Average
Balance
     Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
     Average
Rate
 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Demand

   $ 108,281         $ 113,325      

Interest checking

     85,142         0.27     89,820         0.37

Money market

     64,839         0.46        63,212         0.49   

Savings

     40,742         0.32        38,665         0.40   

Certificates of deposit

     731,863         1.36        912,061         1.52   
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

Total deposits

   $ 1,030,867         1.03   $ 1,217,083         1.20
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

The following table sets forth the average daily balances and weighted average rates paid for our certificates of deposit for the periods indicated:

 

     For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
2013
    For the Year
Ended December 31,
2012
 
     Average
Balance
     Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
     Average
Rate
 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Less than $100,000

   $ 422,815         1.30   $ 478,502         1.40

$100,000 or more

     309,048         1.45     433,559         1.64
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

Total

   $ 731,863         1.36   $ 912,601         1.52
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

The following table shows at June 30, 2013 the amount of our time deposits of $100,000 or more by time remaining until maturity:

 

Maturity Period

   Retail      Brokered      Total  
     (in thousands)  

Three months or less

   $ 45,265       $ —         $ 45,265   

Three months through six months

     39,963         —           39,963   

Six months through twelve months

     54,614         —           54,614   

Over twelve months

     148,406         —           148,406   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 288,248       $ —         $ 288,248   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

51


Table of Contents

Liquidity

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility we may not be able to satisfy current or future financial commitments, or may become unduly reliant on alternative funding sources. The objective of liquidity risk management is to ensure that we meet the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, as well as our operating cash needs, taking into account all on- and off-balance sheet funding demands. Liquidity risk management also involves ensuring that we meet our cash flow needs at a reasonable cost. We maintain an investment and funds management policy, which identifies primary sources of liquidity, establishes procedures for monitoring and measuring liquidity, and establishes minimum liquidity requirements in compliance with regulatory guidance. Our Asset Liability Committee regularly monitors and reviews our liquidity position.

Funds are available from a number of sources, including the sale of securities in the available-for-sale portion of the investment portfolio, principal pay-downs on loans and mortgage-backed securities, customer deposit inflows, brokered deposits and other wholesale funding. Our investment portfolio totaled $176.9 million at June 30, 2013. $116.1 million of our securities currently have an unrealized loss of $4.0 million. Historically, we have utilized brokered and wholesale deposits to supplement our funding strategy. The Bank previously held $15.0 million in brokered deposits, which matured in the second quarter of 2013. We are currently restricted from accepting, renewing, or rolling-over brokered deposits without the prior receipt of a waiver on a case-by-case basis from our regulators. We intend to redeem the brokered deposits at maturity in the normal course of business.

Traditionally, we have borrowed from the FHLB to supplement our funding requirements. The advances are collateralized by first mortgage residential loans. The borrowing capacity is based on the market value of the underlying pledged loans. At June 30, 2013, our additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB was $15.5 million. Any new advances are limited to a one year maturity or less.

We also have federal funds borrowing lines from major correspondent banks totaling $5.0 million on a secured basis. Management believes our sources of liquidity are adequate to meet expected cash needs for the foreseeable future. However, the availability of these lines could be affected by our financial position, and our lenders could exercise their right to deny a funding request at their discretion. We are also subject to FDIC interest rate restrictions for deposits. As such, we are permitted to offer up to the “national rate” plus 75 basis points as published weekly by the FDIC.

We use cash to pay dividends on common stock, if and when declared by the Board of Directors, and to service debt. The main sources of funding include dividends paid by PBI Bank and financing obtained in the capital markets. During 2011, Porter Bancorp contributed $13.1 million to its subsidiary, PBI Bank, which substantially decreased its liquid assets. The contribution was made to strengthen the Bank’s capital in an effort to help it comply with its capital ratio requirements under the consent order. Liquid assets decreased from $20.3 million at December 31, 2010, to $3.0 million at June 30, 2013. Since the Bank is unlikely to be in a position to pay dividends to the parent company for the foreseeable future, cash inflows for the parent are limited to earnings on investment securities, sales of investment securities, and interest on deposits with the Bank. These cash inflows along with the liquid assets held at June 30, 2013, totaling $3.0 million, are needed for the ongoing cash operating expenses of the parent company which have been reduced and are expected to be approximately $1.1 million for 2013. We have elected to defer payments on our Series A preferred stock and on our trust preferred securities. Parent company liquidity could be improved if a capital raise was completed.

 

52


Table of Contents

Capital

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we began deferring the payment of regular quarterly cash dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury. At June 30, 2013, cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends on this stock totaled $3.3 million. We have deferred dividend payments for six quarters and the holder of our Series A Preferred Stock (currently the U.S. Treasury) has the right to appoint up to two representatives to our Board of Directors. We continue to accrue deferred dividends, which are deducted from income to common shareholders for financial statement purposes.

In addition, effective with the fourth quarter of 2011, we began deferring interest payments on our junior subordinated notes which resulted in a deferral of distributions on our trust preferred securities. We have the option to defer interest payments from time-to-time for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. Thereafter, we must pay all deferred interest and resume quarterly interest payments or we will be in default. Future cash dividends on our common stock are subject to the prior payment of all deferred distributions on our trust preferred securities. At June 30, 2013, cumulative accrued and unpaid interest on our junior subordinated notes totaled $1.2 million.

Stockholders’ equity decreased $8.4 million to $38.7 million at June 30, 2013, compared with $47.2 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease was due to the current year net loss, further reduced by dividends declared (accrued and unpaid) on cumulative preferred stock and an increase in unrealized loss on available for sale securities.

Each of the federal bank regulatory agencies has established risk-based capital requirements for banking organizations. In addition, PBI Bank has agreed with its primary regulators to maintain a ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets (“total risk-based capital ratio”) of at least 12.0%, and a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets (“leverage ratio”) of 9.0%.

The following table shows the ratios of Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-adjusted assets and the leverage ratios for Porter Bancorp, Inc. and PBI Bank at the dates indicated:

 

                

Minimum Capital

Ratios Under
Consent Order

    June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  
    

Regulatory
Minimums

   

Well-Capitalized
Minimums

      Porter
Bancorp
    PBI
Bank
    Porter
Bancorp
    PBI
Bank
 

Tier 1 Capital

     4.0     6.0     N/A        6.88     8.47     6.46     7.71

Total risk-based capital

     8.0        10.0        12.0     10.46        10.60        9.81        9.82   

Tier 1 leverage ratio

     4.0        5.0        9.0        4.91        6.08        4.50        5.37   

At June 30, 2013, PBI Bank’s Tier 1 leverage ratio was 6.08%, which is below the 9% minimum capital ratio required by the Consent Order, and its total risk-based capital ratio was 10.60%, which is below the 12% minimum capital ratio required by the Consent Order. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition.

 

53


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company’s interest sensitivity profile was asset sensitive at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012. Given a 100 basis point increase in interest rates sustained for one year, base net interest income would increase by an estimated 1.1% at June 30, 2013, compared with an increase of 4.11% at December 31, 2012, and is within the risk tolerance parameters of our risk management policy. Given a 200 basis point increase in interest rates sustained for one year, base net interest income would increase by an estimated 2.3% at June 30, 2013, compared with an increase of 8.11% at December 31, 2012, and is within the risk tolerance parameters of our risk management policy.

The following table indicates the estimated impact on net interest income under various interest rate scenarios for the twelve months following June 30, 2013, as calculated using the static shock model approach:

 

     Change in Future
Net Interest Income
 
     Dollar Change      Percentage
Change
 
     (dollars in thousands)  

+ 200 basis points

   $ 649         2.31

+ 100 basis points

     311         1.10   

We did not run a model simulation for declining interest rates as of June 30, 2013, because the Federal Reserve effectively lowered the federal funds target rate between 0.00% to 0.25% in December 2008. Therefore, no significant further short-term rate reductions can occur.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our president and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, our president and chief financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this report, these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Additionally, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting.

 

54


Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of operations, we are defendants in various legal proceedings. Except as described in Footnote 13, “Contingencies” in the Notes to our consolidated financial statement, in the opinion of management, there is no known legal proceeding pending which an adverse decision would be expected to result in a material adverse change in our business or consolidated financial position. See Footnote 13, “Contingencies” in the Notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional detail regarding ongoing legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

PBI Bank provides trust services to our customers. From time to time, PBI Bank has served as trustee for Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) including service as transaction trustee in ESOP purchase transactions. In this capacity, we are charged with acting as a fiduciary with respect to the ESOP. ESOP transactions are subject to review by the United States Department of Labor (DOL). At any given time, we may serve as trustee for ESOPs under review by the DOL, and failure to fulfill our fiduciary duties under ERISA with respect to any such plan could subject us to certain financial risks such as claims for damages as well as fines and penalties assessable under ERISA.

In addition to the foregoing, we also refer you the detailed cautionary statements and discussion of risks that affect our Company and its business in “Item 1A – Risk Factors” of our December 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3. Default Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

The appointment of Joseph C. (Joe) Seiler as Executive Vice President of PBI Bank and head of the Bank’s commercial banking business became effective on August 7, 2013, following regulatory approval.

Mr. Seiler, age 47, most recently served as Executive Vice President, Asset Resolution Team, of PNC Bank, Inc. in Louisville, Kentucky. Prior to joining PNC Bank in 2009, he served as Executive Vice President & Managing Director, Investment Real Estate Group for National City Bank of Louisville, Kentucky. He is also actively involved in professional and civic organizations in Louisville and most recently served as the treasurer for a non-profit organization with $3 million in annual revenue and $2 million in assets.

He holds a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from the University of Louisville and a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics from Centre College in Danville, Kentucky.

Item 6. Exhibits

 

(a)

Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed or furnished as part of this report:

 

Exhibit Number

  

Description of Exhibit

10.1

  

Employment Agreement of Joseph C. Seiler, Executive Vice President.

10.2

  

Employment Agreement of Phillip W. Barnhouse, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer.

31.1

  

Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a).

31.2

  

Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a).

32.1

  

Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

  

Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

55


Table of Contents

101

  

The following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

56


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act if 1934, the Registrant had duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

   

PORTER BANCORP, INC.

(Registrant)

 

August 8, 2013

   

By:

 

/s/ John T. Taylor

       

John T. Taylor

President

 

 

August 8, 2013

   

By:

 

/s/ Phillip W. Barnhouse

       

Phillip W. Barnhouse

Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

 

57