LINDSAY CORP - Quarter Report: 2012 November (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2012

OR

Commission File Number 1-13419

Lindsay Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

402-829-6800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of January 3, 2013, 12,842,586 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation

INDEX FORM 10-Q

- 2

Table of Contents

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - Financial Statements

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 3

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 4

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 5

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 6

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and do not include all of the disclosures normally required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as contained in Lindsay Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012.

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected by the Company for a full year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior financial statements and notes to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications were not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, by requiring all nonowner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, which defers certain portions of ASU No. 2011-05 indefinitely and will be further deliberated by the FASB at a future date. The Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05 in the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2012 and elected to present nonowner changes in shareholders’ equity in two separate but consecutive statements.

New Accounting Standards Issued but not yet adopted

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Amendments to Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The objective of ASU No. 2011-11 is to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial position. This includes the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with an entity’s recognized assets and recognized liabilities which include: derivatives, sale and repurchase agreements, reverse sale and repurchase agreements, securities borrowing, and securities lending arrangements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to impact its consolidated financial statements.

- 7

Table of Contents

Note 3 – Net Earnings per Share

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011:

Certain stock options and restricted stock units were excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Performance stock units are excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares until the threshold performance conditions have been satisfied. Items excluded from the calculation were not significant for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011.

Note 4 – Income Taxes

It is the Company’s policy to report income tax expense for interim periods using an estimated annual effective income tax rate. However, the tax effects of significant or unusual items are not considered in the estimated annual effective income tax rate. The tax effects of such discrete events are recognized in the interim period in which the events occur. The Company recorded no material discrete items for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011.

The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.7 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate used to calculate income tax expense before discrete items was 34.2 percent for each of the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011.

Note 5 – Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following as of November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012:

Note 6 – Credit Arrangements

At November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all loan covenants. There have been no changes made to credit arrangements since August 31, 2012.

Outstanding long-term debt consists of the following:

- 8

Table of Contents

Note 7 – Financial Derivatives

The Company uses certain financial derivatives to mitigate its exposure to volatility in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not invest in derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company manages market and credit risks associated with its derivative instruments by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken, and by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties. As of November 30, 2012, the Company’s derivative counterparty had investment grade credit ratings.

Financial derivatives consist of the following:

Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) included realized and unrealized after-tax gains of $1.7 million, $1.1 million and $2.4 million at November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012, respectively, related to derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments.

Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

In order to reduce interest rate risk on the BSI Term Note, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that is designed to convert the variable interest rate on the entire amount of the borrowing to a fixed rate of 6.05 percent per annum. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company receives variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments on an amount equal to the outstanding balance of the BSI Term Note. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap designated as a hedging instrument that effectively offset the variability of cash flows associated with variable-rate, long-term debt obligations are reported in AOCI, net of related income tax effects.

In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company, at times, may enter into forward exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency for certain of its operations. This activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the forward exchange contracts or option contracts designated as hedging instruments that effectively offset the hedged risks are reported in AOCI, net of related income tax effects.

Net Investment Hedging Relationships

In order to reduce translation exposure resulting from translating the financial statements of its international subsidiaries into U.S. dollars, the Company, at times, utilizes Euro foreign currency forward contracts to hedge a portion of its Euro net investment exposure in its foreign operations. These foreign currency forward contracts qualify as a hedge of net investments in foreign operations. Changes in fair value of the net investment hedge contracts are reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) as part of the currency translation adjustment, net of tax.

- 9

Table of Contents

For the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company settled Euro foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net (loss) gain of ($0.7 million) and $0.3 million, respectively, which were included in OCI as part of a currency translation adjustment.

There were no amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations related to ineffectiveness of Euro foreign currency forward contracts for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011. Accumulated currency translation adjustments in AOCI at November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012 reflected realized and unrealized after-tax gains of $1.8 million, $1.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively.

At November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012, the Company had outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contracts to sell 13.0 million Euro, 17.0 million Euro and 26.5 million Euro, respectively, at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts qualify as hedges of a net investment in foreign operations.

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012, respectively.

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current portion) was $3.2 million, $7.5 million and $4.3 million as of November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012, respectively. The fair value of this debt was estimated at $3.2 million, $7.4 million, and $4.3 million as of November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012, respectively. Fair value of long-term debt (including current portion) is estimated (using level 2 inputs) by discounting the future estimated cash flows of each instrument at current market interest rates for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities and credit quality. The Company also measures the fair value of certain assets on a non-recurring basis, generally quarterly, annually, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. These assets include fixed assets, goodwill, and other intangible assets. There were no required fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three months ended November 30, 2012 or 2011.

- 10

Table of Contents

Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies

In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Company is involved, from time to time, in commercial litigation, employment disputes, administrative proceedings, and other legal proceedings. None of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, is expected to have a material effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.

In 1992, the Company entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) in which the Company committed to remediate environmental contamination of the groundwater that was discovered in 1982 through 1990 at and adjacent to its Lindsay, Nebraska facility (the “site”). The site was added to the EPA’s list of priority superfund sites in 1989. Between 1993 and 1995, remediation plans for the site were approved by the EPA and fully implemented by the Company. Since 1998, the primary remaining contamination at the site has been the presence of volatile organic chemicals in the groundwater. The remediation process consists of drilling wells into the aquifer and pumping water to the surface to allow these contaminants to be removed by aeration. The Company accrues the anticipated cost of remediation when the obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated.

In 2008, the Company and the EPA conducted their periodic five-year review of the status of the remediation of the contamination of the site. In response to the review, the Company and its environmental consultants have developed a remedial action work plan. In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company undertook an investigation to assess further potential site remediation and containment actions. In connection with the receipt of preliminary results of this investigation and other evaluations, the Company estimated that it would incur $7.2 million in remediation and operating costs and accrued that undiscounted amount as an operating expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company did not accrue any additional incremental costs related to environmental remediation liabilities.

Although the Company has accrued all reasonably estimable costs associated with remediation of the site, it is expected that additional testing and environmental monitoring and remediation will be required in the future as part of the Company’s ongoing discussions with the EPA regarding the development and implementation of the remedial action plans, which could result in changes to its estimates. In addition, the current investigation has not yet been completed and does not include all affected areas on the site. Estimates continue to be refined and evaluated on a number of remediation alternatives and the EPA has not provided approval of possible action plans. While additional estimated expenses could significantly exceed the amount accrued as of November 30, 2012 and could be material to the operating results of any fiscal quarter or fiscal year, the Company does not expect such additional expenses would have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial condition.

The following table summarizes the undiscounted environmental remediation liability classifications included in the balance sheet as of November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012:

Note 10 – Warranties

The following table provides the changes in the Company’s product warranties:

- 11

Table of Contents

Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation

The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations over the periods during which the employee or director is required to perform a service in exchange for the award. The Company’s current share-based compensation plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company, provides for awards of stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance stock units (“PSUs”) to employees and non-employee directors of the Company. In connection with the restricted stock units, performance stock units and stock options, the Company is accruing compensation expense based on the estimated number of shares expected to be issued utilizing the most current information available to the Company at the date of the financial statements.

Restricted stock units are generally settled with the issuance of shares of common stock with the exception of certain restricted stock units awarded to internationally-based employees that are settled in cash. The performance stock units vest contingent upon meeting various performance goals. The performance goals are based upon a three-year revenue growth and a three-year average return on net assets over the performance period. The awards actually earned may range from zero to two hundred percent of the targeted number of performance stock units and will be paid in shares of common stock. If defined performance goals are not met, no compensation cost will be recognized and any previously recognized compensation expense will be reversed. Share-based compensation expense was $1.2 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The following table illustrates the type and fair value of the share-based compensation awards granted during the three month periods ended November 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

The following table provides the assumptions used in determining the fair value of the share-based awards for the three month periods ended November 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

- 12

Table of Contents

Note 12 – Industry Segment Information

Irrigation

This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of center pivot, lateral move, and hose reel irrigation systems as well as various water pumping stations and controls. The irrigation reporting segment consists of twelve operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution.

Infrastructure

This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of moveable barriers, specialty barriers and crash cushions; providing outsource manufacturing services and the manufacturing and selling of large diameter steel tubing and railroad signals and structures. The infrastructure reporting segment consists of three operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria.

The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on segment sales, gross profit, and operating income, with operating income for segment purposes excluding unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses, interest income, interest expense, other income and expenses, and income taxes. Operating income for segment purposes does include general and administrative expenses, selling expenses, engineering and research expenses, environmental remediation expenses and other overhead charges directly attributable to the segment. The Company has no single major customer representing 10 percent or more of its total revenues during the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011. Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following tables:

- 13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect expectations for future Company conditions or performance. In addition, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on the Company’s worldwide web site, or otherwise, in the future by or on behalf of the Company. When used by or on behalf of the Company, the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “will,” and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. The entire section entitled “Market Conditions and Fiscal 2013 Outlook” should be considered forward-looking statements. For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2012. Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results or conditions, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results or conditions could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein, as well as others not now anticipated. The risks and uncertainties described herein are not exclusive and further information concerning the Company and its businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company’s financial results, may emerge from time to time. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

Accounting Policies

In preparing the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management must make a variety of decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. These decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In making these decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and the Company’s historical experience.

The Company’s accounting policies that are most important to the presentation of its results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as its critical accounting policies. See discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies under Item 7 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2012. Management periodically re-evaluates and adjusts its critical accounting policies as circumstances change. There were no changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies during the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2012.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

- 14

Table of Contents

Executive Overview

Operating revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2012 increased by 24 percent to $147.4 million compared with $119.2 million for the three months ended November 30, 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in domestic irrigation revenues. The trend for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 included higher demand for domestic irrigation systems stimulated by positive fundamental drivers in the agricultural economy offset by lower infrastructure products demand impacted by government funding issues and project delays. As drought conditions across the U.S. pushed commodity prices higher through the summer months and fall months, the realization of the importance of efficient, mechanical irrigation rose, creating robust market conditions for irrigation equipment sales during the first quarter. Gross margins improved to 29.1 percent compared to 25.4 percent in the comparable prior year period as higher gross margin in the irrigation segment more than offset lower gross margins in the infrastructure segment. Net earnings were $14.7 million or $1.15 per diluted share for the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared with $2.9 million or $0.23 per diluted share for the same prior year period. The operating expenses for the three months ended November 30, 2011 included $7.2 million, or $0.37 per diluted share on an after tax basis, of accrued expenses relating to an estimated increase in the Company’s liability for environmental remediation at its Lindsay, Nebraska facility.

Results of Operations

The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011. It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:

Revenues

Operating revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2012 increased by 24 percent to $147.4 million compared with $119.2 million for the three months ended November 30, 2011. The increase is attributable to a $33.4 million increase in irrigation revenues offset in part by a $5.3 million decrease in infrastructure revenues. The irrigation segment provided 91 percent of Company revenue for the three months ended November 30, 2012 as compared to 85 percent of the prior year, due to exceptional growth in irrigation equipment revenues and the decline in infrastructure revenues.

- 15

Table of Contents

U.S. irrigation revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2012 of $96.5 million increased 59 percent compared to the three months ended November 30, 2011. The increase in U.S. irrigation revenues is primarily due to a 56 percent increase in the number of irrigation systems sold compared to the prior year, with the largest increases in the drought impacted Corn Belt. Favorable economic conditions in U.S. agriculture markets and drought conditions continued to drive strong demand for irrigation equipment. The drought led to lower yields in 2012 and higher commodity prices with corn prices increasing 23 percent and soybean prices increasing 32 percent from the same period last year. Higher commodity prices and drought insurance proceeds are contributing to significantly higher Net Farm Income as the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) forecasted 2012 Net Farm Income to be approximately $114.0 billion as of November 2012. This is the second highest on record and 54 percent above the 10 year average. The Company’s distribution channel indicated continued robust demand as growers demonstrated willingness to make investments in irrigation to enhance yields and improve Net Farm Income. The robust U.S. irrigation equipment order flow also highlighted growers concern regarding the impact of future dry weather, concern over the continuation of the Section 179 favorable tax treatment of purchases, and concern regarding the ability to get irrigation equipment during the upcoming spring selling season.

International irrigation revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2012 of $37.7 million decreased 6 percent compared to the three months ended November 30, 2011. The decrease in international irrigation revenues is primarily due to an 8 percent decrease in the number of irrigation systems sold compared to the prior year. Operating revenues decreased primarily due to less international project based revenue in the Middle East, which were offset in part by increases in Canada and modest sales gains from growth efforts in Russia.

Infrastructure segment revenues were $13.2 million for the three months ended November 30, 2012 decreasing 29 percent from $18.4 million for the three months ended November 30, 2011 primarily due to lower sales of road safety products, Road Zipper systems sales and leases, and rail products. Infrastructure sales continue to be constrained by uncertainty of longer term plans for highway projects and government funding.

Gross Margin

Gross profit for the three months ended November 30, 2012 of $42.9 million increased 42 percent compared to $30.2 million for three months ended November 30, 2011. The increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to a $7.2 million gross profit increase on higher sales volume and a $5.5 million gross profit increase from improvement in gross margin. Gross margin was 29.1 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to 25.4 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2011. Irrigation segment gross margins increased by approximately 4 percentage points primarily due to cost improvement, as input costs were down slightly from prior year, fixed cost leverage from higher sales, and improved sales pricing. Infrastructure segment gross margins decreased by approximately 4 percentage points due to unfavorable product mix from lower Road Zipper system lease volume and deleverage of fixed costs from lower sales.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s operating expenses of $20.6 million for the three months ended November 30, 2012 were $4.6 million lower than such expenses for the three months ended November 30, 2011. The decrease in operating expenses is primarily related to $7.2 million of environmental remediation expenses in the prior year. The decrease in environmental expenses was partially offset by increases in operating expenses that were primarily related to increases in research and development expenses of $1.1 million along with personnel related increases of $1.1 million driven by higher incentive compensation and headcount to support growth.

Operating expenses were 14.0 percent of sales for the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to 21.1 percent of sales for the three months ended November 30, 2011. Operating margin was 15.1 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2012 as compared to 4.3 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2011.

Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.7 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate used to calculate income tax expense before discrete items was 34.2 percent for each of the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $152.2 million at November 30, 2012 compared with $108.7 million at November 30, 2011 and $143.4 million at August 31, 2012. The Company requires cash for financing its receivables and inventories, paying operating expenses and capital expenditures, and for share repurchases and dividends. The Company meets its liquidity needs and finances its capital expenditures from its available cash and funds provided by operations along with borrowings under three credit arrangements that are described below. The Company believes its current cash resources, projected operating cash flow, and remaining capacity under its bank lines of credit are sufficient to cover all of its expected working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, dividends, and other cash requirements, excluding potential acquisitions. Although the Company made no repurchases of its common stock during the three months ended November 30, 2012, the Company does have existing authorization to purchase up to 881,139 shares of its common stock under the Company’s share repurchase plan.

- 16

Table of Contents

The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries, in which earnings are considered indefinitely reinvested, was approximately $17.5 million and $15.1 million as of November 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company considers these funds to be permanently reinvested, and would need to accrue and pay taxes if these funds were repatriated. The Company does not intend to repatriate the funds, and does not expect these funds to have a significant impact on the Company’s overall liquidity.

Net working capital was $234.2 million at November 30, 2012, as compared with $181.5 million at November 30, 2011. The increase in net working capital mainly resulted from increased cash from earnings over the past year, increased inventory to support the increases in sales, especially in the irrigation segment, and increased receivables due to higher sales offset by increased payables related to increases in inventory. Cash flows provided by operations totaled $13.5 million during the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to $6.2 million provided by operations during the same prior year period. Cash provided by operations increased by $7.3 million compared to the prior year period primarily as a result of increased earnings ($11.8 million) and positive cash flow changes in payables ($10.4 million) and other current liabilities ($2.0 million) offset in part by decreases due to negative cash flow changes in receivables ($6.6 million), other noncurrent assets and liabilities ($5.4 million) and inventories ($4.8 million).

Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $3.3 million during the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to cash flows used in investing activities of $2.2 million during the same prior year period. The increase in the net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the payments for the settlement of net investment hedge losses for the three months ended November 30, 2012 versus proceeds from settlement of net investment gains for the prior year. Capital spending of $2.2 million in fiscal 2013 decreased compared to the prior year capital spending of $2.6 million.

Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $1.7 million during the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $2.7 million during the same prior year period. The decrease in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to a $1.3 million increase in share-based compensation activities and an increase of $0.3 million of additional dividends paid. The Company’s total interest-bearing debt decreased from $7.5 million at November 30, 2011 to $3.2 million at November 30, 2012 due to four quarterly principal payments. The remaining $3.2 million of interest-bearing debt at November 30, 2012 is scheduled to be paid by June 10, 2013.

Euro Line of Credit

The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe SAS, has an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a European commercial bank, under which it could borrow for working capital purposes up to 2.3 million Euros, which equates to approximately USD $3.0 million as of November 30, 2012 (the “Euro Line of Credit”). There were no borrowings outstanding on this credit agreement at November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012. Under the terms of the Euro Line of Credit, borrowings, if any, bear interest at a floating rate in effect from time to time designated by the commercial bank as the Euro Interbank Offered Rate plus 110 basis points (1.29 percent at November 30, 2012). Unpaid principal and interest is due by January 31, 2013. The Company intends to renew the Euro Line of Credit upon expiration of its term.

BSI Term Note

The Company entered into an unsecured $30.0 million Term Note and Credit Agreement, effective June 1, 2006, with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “BSI Term Note”) to partially finance the acquisition of Barrier Systems, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“BSI”). Borrowings under the BSI Term Note bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 50 basis points (0.71 percent as of November 30, 2012). The Company effectively fixed the economic effect of the variable interest rate at 6.05 percent through an interest rate swap as described in Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Principal is repaid quarterly in equal payments of $1.1 million over a seven-year period that began in September of 2006. The BSI Term Note is due June 10, 2013.

Revolving Credit Agreement

The Company has an unsecured $30.0 million Revolving Credit Note and Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). The Revolving Credit Agreement was amended on January 23, 2011 in order to extend the termination date from January 23, 2012 to January 23, 2014. The borrowings from the amended Revolving Credit Agreement may primarily be used for working capital purposes and funding acquisitions. At November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012, there was no outstanding balance on the Revolving Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 105 basis points (1.26 percent as of November 30, 2012), subject to adjustment as set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement as amended. Interest is paid on a monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the amended Revolving Credit Agreement. Any unpaid principal and interest is due by January 23, 2014.

- 17

Table of Contents

The BSI Term Note and the Revolving Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Notes”) each contain similar covenants, including certain covenants relating to the Company’s financial condition. These include maintaining a funded debt to EBITDA ratio, a fixed charge coverage ratio, a current ratio and a tangible net worth requirement (all as defined in the Notes) at specified levels. Upon the occurrence of any event of default of these covenants specified in the Notes, including a change in control of the Company (as defined in the Notes), all amounts due thereunder may be declared to be immediately due and payable. At November 30, 2012 and 2011 and August 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all loan covenants.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

There have been no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012.

Market Conditions and Fiscal 2013 Outlook

The drought conditions experienced this past year have reinforced the importance of efficient water use for yield enhancement and preservation, and at the same time driven commodity prices higher, improving the outlook for the overall agriculture sector and particularly irrigation equipment. As of November 2012, the USDA projects U.S. 2012 Net Farm Income to be $114.0 billion and 54 percent higher than the ten year average, continuing to represent positive economic conditions for U.S. farmers. Demand for the Company’s irrigation equipment is closely aligned with Net Farm Income and commodity prices and can fluctuate significantly on a quarterly or annual basis. The U.S. federal government examines the level of farm subsidies and tax credits from time to time and changes to these programs could have a positive or adverse impact on commodity prices and irrigation equipment demand. The Company believes the most significant opportunities for growth over the next several years are in international markets, where irrigation use is significantly less developed, and demand is driven by food security, water scarcity and population growth.

Infrastructure demand, including for Road Zipper system projects, has proven to be challenging due to funding issues and project delays. The infrastructure segment continues to experience revenue and profit volatility due to the project nature of the Road Zipper systems and the fixed nature of some operating expenses. However, the Company has focused on operating efficiencies, lean manufacturing and pricing controls to be well positioned for margin improvement when the infrastructure segment returns to positive sales growth. During 2012 the U.S. government extended the multi-year U.S. highway bill through 2014, creating moderately positive sentiment for U.S. infrastructure spending by setting U.S. transportation policy for the next two years. The outlook for government funded infrastructure spending remains challenging due to global governmental budget constraints. The Company is confident in the opportunity for Road Zipper systems to drive significant profitability over the long term as a superior solution to worldwide traffic congestion, lost productivity and energy waste. Demand for the Company’s transportation safety products continues to be driven by population growth and the need for improved road safety.

As of November 30, 2012, the Company has an order backlog of $85.1 million compared with $52.8 million at November 30, 2011 and $57.1 million at August 31, 2012. The Company believes the quarter end backlog represents pulling forward some volume, at least in part, from the second half of fiscal 2013. The Company’s backlog can fluctuate from period to period due to the seasonality, cyclicality, timing and execution of contracts. Typically, the Company’s backlog at any point in time represents only a portion of the revenue it expects to realize during the following three month period. However, the timing related to certain project oriented contracts may extend longer than three months.

For the business overall, the global, long-term drivers of water conservation, population growth, increasing importance of biofuels, and the need for safer, more efficient transportation solutions remain positive. In addition, the Company continues to have an ongoing, structured, acquisition process that is expected to generate additional growth opportunities throughout the world in water and infrastructure. The Company is committed to achieving earnings growth by employing sound business strategies, including without limitation global market expansion, improvements in margins, and/or strategic acquisitions.