Annual Statements Open main menu
  1. Annual Statements
  2. » Companies
  3. » LXP Industrial Trust
  4. » Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

LXP Industrial Trust - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017.
or
o
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from _________________ to ________________
Commission File Number
1-12386 (Lexington Realty Trust)
33-04215 (Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.)
 LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (Lexington Realty Trust)
13-3717318 (Lexington Realty Trust)
Delaware (Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.)
13-3779859 (Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.)
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation of organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015, New York, NY 10119-4015
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
(212) 692-7200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Lexington Realty Trust
 Yes x   No ¨
Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.
 Yes x   No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). 
Lexington Realty Trust
 Yes x   No ¨
Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.
 Yes x   No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Lexington Realty Trust:
 
 
 
 
Large accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨
Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth
 
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
company ¨
Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.:
 
 
 
 
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer x
Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth
 
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.     
Lexington Realty Trust
 Yes ¨   No x
Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.
 Yes ¨   No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Lexington Realty Trust
 Yes ¨   No x
Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.
 Yes ¨   No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of Lexington Realty Trust's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 240,621,239 common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.0001 per share, as of August 4, 2017.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017, which we refer to as this Quarterly Report, of (1) Lexington Realty Trust, which we refer to as the Company or the Trust, and subsidiaries and (2) Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P., which we refer to as the Partnership or LCIF, and subsidiaries. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, (1) “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, including LCIF and its consolidated subsidiaries, and (2) LCIF or the Partnership refers to LCIF and its consolidated subsidiaries. All of the Company's and LCIF's interests in properties are held, and all property operating activities are conducted, through special purpose entities, which we refer to as property owner subsidiaries or lender subsidiaries, which are separate and distinct legal entities, but in some instances are consolidated for financial statement purposes and/or disregarded for income tax purposes.

The Company is the sole equity owner of (1) Lex GP-1 Trust, or Lex GP, a Delaware statutory trust, and (2) Lex LP-1 Trust, or Lex LP, a Delaware statutory trust.  The Company, through Lex GP and Lex LP, holds, as of June 30, 2017, approximately 96% of LCIF's outstanding units of limited partner interest, which we refer to as OP units. The remaining OP units are beneficially owned by E. Robert Roskind, Chairman of the Trust, and certain non-affiliated investors. As the sole equity owner of LCIF’s general partner, the Company has the ability to control all of LCIF’s day-to-day operations subject to the terms of LCIF’s partnership agreement.

OP units not owned by LXP are accounted for as partners’ capital in LCIF’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in the Trust’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

We believe it is important to understand the differences between the Trust and LCIF in the context of how the Trust and LCIF operate as an interrelated, consolidated company. The Trust’s and LCIF’s businesses are substantially the same; except that LCIF is dependent on the Trust for management of LCIF’s operations and future investments as LCIF does not have any employees, executive officers or a board of directors.  

The Trust also invests in assets and conducts business directly and through other subsidiaries.  The Trust allocates investments to itself and its other subsidiaries or LCIF as it deems appropriate and in accordance with certain obligations under LCIF’s partnership agreement with respect to allocations of non-recourse liabilities. The Trust and LCIF are co-borrowers under the Trust’s unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans.  LCIF is a guarantor of the Trust’s publicly-traded debt securities.  

We believe combining the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of the Trust and LCIF into this single report results in the following benefits:

•
combined reports better reflect how management and the analyst community view the business as a single operating unit;
•
combined reports enhance investors’ understanding of the Trust and LCIF by enabling them to view the business as a whole and in the same manner as management;
•
combined reports are more efficient for the Trust and LCIF and result in savings in time, effort and expense; and
•
combined reports are more efficient for investors by reducing duplicative disclosure and providing a single document for their review.

To help investors understand the significant differences between the Trust and LCIF, this Quarterly Report separately presents the following for each of the Trust and LCIF: (1) the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, (2) Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (3) Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures, and (4) Exhibit 31 and Exhibit 32 certifications.


2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION:
We file and furnish annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the SEC. You may read and copy any materials that we file or furnish with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We file and furnish information electronically with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file or furnish electronically with the SEC. The address of the SEC's Internet site is http://www.sec.gov. We also maintain a web site at http://www.lxp.com through which you can obtain copies of documents that we file or furnish with the SEC. The contents of that web site are not incorporated by reference in or otherwise a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or any other document that we file or furnish with the SEC.


3
Table of Contents


PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Assets:
 
 
 
Real estate, at cost
$
3,638,123

 
$
3,533,172

Real estate - intangible assets
575,172

 
597,294

Investments in real estate under construction
29,442

 
106,652

 
4,242,737

 
4,237,118

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,185,911

 
1,208,792

Real estate, net
3,056,826

 
3,028,326

Assets held for sale
5,984

 
23,808

Cash and cash equivalents
93,279

 
86,637

Restricted cash
35,939

 
31,142

Investment in and advances to non-consolidated entities
61,771

 
67,125

Deferred expenses, net
32,873

 
33,360

Loans receivable, net
—

 
94,210

Rent receivable – current
5,407

 
7,516

Rent receivable – deferred
41,789

 
31,455

Other assets
32,935

 
37,888

Total assets
$
3,366,803

 
$
3,441,467

 
 
 
 
Liabilities and Equity:
 

 
 

Liabilities:
 

 
 

Mortgages and notes payable, net
$
703,845

 
$
738,047

Term loans payable, net
501,602

 
501,093

Senior notes payable, net
494,780

 
494,362

Trust preferred securities, net
127,146

 
127,096

Dividends payable
48,037

 
47,264

Liabilities held for sale
324

 
191

Accounts payable and other liabilities
33,901

 
59,601

Accrued interest payable
5,953

 
6,704

Deferred revenue - including below market leases, net
39,116

 
39,895

Prepaid rent
15,974

 
14,723

Total liabilities
1,970,678

 
2,028,976

 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies


 


Equity:
 

 
 

Preferred shares, par value $0.0001 per share; authorized 100,000,000 shares:
 

 
 

Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred, liquidation preference $96,770; 1,935,400 shares issued and outstanding
94,016

 
94,016

Common shares, par value $0.0001 per share; authorized 400,000,000 shares, 240,612,821 and 238,037,177 shares issued and outstanding in 2017 and 2016, respectively
24

 
24

Additional paid-in-capital
2,822,217

 
2,800,736

Accumulated distributions in excess of net income
(1,538,442
)
 
(1,500,966
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
443

 
(1,033
)
Total shareholders’ equity
1,378,258

 
1,392,777

Noncontrolling interests
17,867

 
19,714

Total equity
1,396,125

 
1,412,491

Total liabilities and equity
$
3,366,803

 
$
3,441,467

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4
Table of Contents


LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Gross revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental
$
87,565

 
$
108,982

 
$
176,219

 
$
212,202

Tenant reimbursements
8,119

 
7,930

 
15,564

 
15,987

Total gross revenues
95,684

 
116,912

 
191,783

 
228,189

Expense applicable to revenues:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Depreciation and amortization
(42,320
)
 
(41,272
)
 
(85,211
)
 
(84,399
)
Property operating
(12,974
)
 
(11,293
)
 
(25,090
)
 
(23,371
)
General and administrative
(8,141
)
 
(7,747
)
 
(17,598
)
 
(15,522
)
Non-operating income
1,371

 
3,553

 
3,992

 
6,420

Interest and amortization expense
(19,216
)
 
(22,679
)
 
(38,941
)
 
(45,572
)
Debt satisfaction charges, net
(46
)
 
(3,194
)
 
(46
)
 
(3,356
)
Impairment charges and loan loss
(13,599
)
 
(3,014
)
 
(21,591
)
 
(3,014
)
Gains on sales of properties
10,240

 
25,326

 
44,433

 
42,341

Income before provision for income taxes and equity in earnings (losses) of non-consolidated entities
10,999

 
56,592

 
51,731

 
101,716

Provision for income taxes
(377
)
 
(224
)
 
(799
)
 
(637
)
Equity in earnings (losses) of non-consolidated entities
(3,257
)
 
312

 
(1,347
)
 
6,054

Net income
7,365

 
56,680

 
49,585

 
107,133

Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(213
)
 
(1,148
)
 
(393
)
 
(2,158
)
Net income attributable to Lexington Realty Trust shareholders
7,152

 
55,532

 
49,192

 
104,975

Dividends attributable to preferred shares – Series C
(1,573
)
 
(1,573
)
 
(3,145
)
 
(3,145
)
Allocation to participating securities
(60
)
 
(84
)
 
(131
)
 
(175
)
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
5,519

 
$
53,875

 
$
45,916

 
$
101,655

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Net income attributable to common shareholders - per common share basic
$
0.02

 
$
0.23

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.44

Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic
237,720,198

 
232,592,998

 
237,451,355

 
232,617,901

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common shareholders - per common share diluted
$
0.02

 
$
0.23

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.43

Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted
241,531,313

 
235,227,199

 
241,310,529

 
235,151,256

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5
Table of Contents


LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited and in thousands)
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Net income
$
7,365

 
$
56,680

 
$
49,585

 
$
107,133

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net
184

 
(956
)
 
1,476

 
(5,581
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
184

 
(956
)
 
1,476

 
(5,581
)
Comprehensive income
7,549

 
55,724

 
51,061

 
101,552

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(213
)
 
(1,148
)
 
(393
)
 
(2,158
)
Comprehensive income attributable to Lexington Realty Trust shareholders
$
7,336

 
$
54,576

 
$
50,668

 
$
99,394

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6
Table of Contents


LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Unaudited and in thousands)

Six Months ended June 30, 2017
 
Lexington Realty Trust Shareholders
 
 
 
Total
 
Preferred Shares
 
Common Shares
 
Additional Paid-in-Capital
 
Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Net Income
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Noncontrolling Interests
Balance December 31, 2016
$
1,412,491

 
$
94,016

 
$
24

 
$
2,800,736

 
$
(1,500,966
)
 
$
(1,033
)
 
$
19,714

Redemption of noncontrolling OP units for common shares
—

 
—

 
—

 
485

 
—

 
—

 
(485
)
Issuance of common shares and deferred compensation amortization, net
20,996

 
—

 
—

 
20,996

 
—

 
—

 
—

Dividends/distributions
(88,423
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(86,668
)
 
—

 
(1,755
)
Net income
49,585

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
49,192

 
—

 
393

Other comprehensive income
1,476

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,476

 
—

Balance June 30, 2017
$
1,396,125

 
$
94,016

 
$
24

 
$
2,822,217

 
$
(1,538,442
)
 
$
443

 
$
17,867



Six Months ended June 30, 2016
 
Lexington Realty Trust Shareholders
 
 
 
Total
 
Preferred Shares
 
Common Shares
 
Additional Paid-in-Capital
 
Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Net Income
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Noncontrolling Interests
Balance December 31, 2015
$
1,462,531

 
$
94,016

 
$
23

 
$
2,776,837

 
$
(1,428,908
)
 
$
(1,939
)
 
$
22,502

Repurchase of common shares
(8,973
)
 
—

 
—

 
(8,973
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Redemption of noncontrolling OP units for common shares
—

 
—

 
—

 
22

 
—

 
—

 
(22
)
Issuance of common shares and deferred compensation amortization, net
7,583

 
—

 
1

 
7,582

 
—

 
—

 
—

Dividends/distributions
(84,580
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(82,841
)
 
—

 
(1,739
)
Net income
107,133

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
104,975

 
—

 
2,158

Other comprehensive loss
(5,581
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(5,581
)
 
—

Balance June 30, 2016
$
1,478,113

 
$
94,016

 
$
24

 
$
2,775,468

 
$
(1,406,774
)
 
$
(7,520
)
 
$
22,899


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

7
Table of Contents


LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited and in thousands)
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
Net cash provided by operating activities:
$
105,966

 
$
116,920

Cash flows from investing activities:
 

 
 

Acquisition of real estate, including intangible assets
(152,474
)
 
(27,197
)
Investment in real estate under construction
(76,933
)
 
(65,102
)
Capital expenditures
(8,548
)
 
(1,256
)
Net proceeds from sale of properties
148,960

 
131,985

Net proceeds from sale of non-consolidated investment
6,127

 
—

Principal payments received on loans receivable
89,243

 
141

Investments in and advances to non-consolidated entities
(4,068
)
 
(25,005
)
Distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings
425

 
7,061

Increase in deferred leasing costs
(3,056
)
 
(4,707
)
Change in restricted cash
(6,607
)
 
(2,130
)
Change in real estate deposits, net
11,683

 
(68
)
Net cash provided by investing activities
4,752

 
13,722

Cash flows from financing activities:
 

 
 

Dividends to common and preferred shareholders
(85,895
)
 
(82,229
)
Principal amortization payments
(14,797
)
 
(12,499
)
Principal payments on debt, excluding normal amortization
(19,757
)
 
(58,942
)
Retirement of convertible notes
—

 
(672
)
Change in revolving credit facility borrowings, net
—

 
(54,000
)
Payment of developer liabilities
—

 
(3,851
)
Change in deferred financing costs
(292
)
 
(2,176
)
Proceeds of mortgages and notes payable
—

 
57,500

Change in restricted cash
1,572

 
—

Cash distributions to noncontrolling interests
(1,755
)
 
(1,739
)
Issuance of common shares, net
16,848

 
3,466

Repurchase of common shares
—

 
(8,973
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(104,076
)
 
(164,115
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
6,642

 
(33,473
)
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
86,637

 
93,249

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
$
93,279

 
$
59,776


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

8
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)


(1)
The Company and Financial Statement Presentation
Lexington Realty Trust (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, except when the context only applies to the parent entity, the “Company”) is a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that owns a diversified portfolio of equity and, from time to time, debt investments in single-tenant commercial properties.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company had ownership interests in approximately 185 consolidated real estate properties, located in 38 states. The properties in which the Company has an interest are primarily net leased to tenants in various industries.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company operated in a manner intended to enable it to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Accordingly, the Company will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that distributions to its shareholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under the Code. The Company is permitted to participate in certain activities historically prohibited for REITs in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) under the Code. As such, the TRS are subject to federal income taxes on the income from these activities.
The Company conducts its operations either directly or indirectly through (1) property owner subsidiaries and lender subsidiaries, which are single purpose entities, (2) an operating partnership, Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P. (“LCIF”), in which the Company is the sole unit holder of the general partner and the sole unit holder of the limited partner that holds a majority of the limited partner interests, (3) a wholly-owned TRS, and (4) investments in joint ventures. References to “OP units” refer to units of limited partner interests in LCIF. Property owner subsidiaries are landlords under leases for properties in which the Company has an interest and/or borrowers under loan agreements secured by properties in which the Company has an interest and lender subsidiaries are lenders under loan agreements where the Company made an investment in a loan asset, but in all cases are separate and distinct legal entities. Each property owner subsidiary is a separate legal entity that maintains separate books and records. The assets and credit of each property owner subsidiary with a property subject to a mortgage loan are not available to creditors to satisfy the debt and other obligations of any other person, including any other property owner subsidiary or any other affiliate. Consolidated entities that are not property owner subsidiaries do not directly own any of the assets of a property owner subsidiary (or the general partner, member or managing member of such property owner subsidiary), but merely hold partnership, membership or beneficial interests therein, which interests are subordinate to the claims of such property owner subsidiary's (or its general partner's, member's or managing member's) creditors.
The financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Quarterly Report”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 have been prepared by the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, the interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results of the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on March 1, 2017 (“Annual Report”).
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation. The Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with GAAP. The financial statements reflect the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company consolidates the wholly-owned subsidiaries, partnerships and joint ventures which it controls (i) through voting rights or similar rights or (ii) by means other than voting rights if the Company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity ("VIE"). Entities which the Company does not control and entities which are VIEs in which the Company is not a primary beneficiary are accounted for under appropriate GAAP.

9
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

The Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs as it has a controlling financial interest in these entities, including LCIF, in which the Company has an approximate 96% interest. See the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of LCIF included within this Quarterly Report.
The Company has a joint venture limited partnership with a developer which is a consolidated VIE. In January 2017, the joint venture completed the development of an office campus in Lake Jackson, Texas. The Company currently has a 100% interest in the joint venture; however, the developer has certain protective rights, and, upon project close-out, the developer will be credited with a notional capital account for a profit interest and certain cost savings. As of June 30, 2017, the joint venture had $145,664 in real estate, net.
The assets of each VIE are only available to satisfy such VIE's respective liabilities. As of June 30, 2017, the VIEs' mortgages and notes payable are non-recourse to the Company. Below is a summary of selected financial data of consolidated VIEs for which the Company is the primary beneficiary included in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Real estate, net
$
807,895

 
$
778,265

Total assets
$
873,063

 
$
899,801

Mortgages and notes payable, net
$
361,328

 
$
364,099

Total liabilities
$
374,264

 
$
395,332

Use of Estimates. Management has made a number of significant estimates and assumptions to prepare these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, including, among others, those relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based on management's best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors. Management adjusts such estimates when facts and circumstances dictate. The most significant estimates made include the recoverability of accounts receivable, the allocation of property purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the determination of VIEs and which entities should be consolidated, the determination of impairment of long-lived assets, loans receivable and equity method investments, the valuation of derivative financial instruments, the valuation of compensation plans and the useful lives of long-lived assets. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Fair Value Measurements. The Company follows the guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, as amended (“Topic 820”), to determine the fair value of financial and non-financial instruments. Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 - observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 - unobservable inputs, which are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as considering counterparty credit risk. The Company has formally elected to apply the portfolio exception within Topic 820 with respect to measuring counterparty risk for all of its derivative transactions subject to master netting arrangements.

10
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

Acquisition, Development and Construction Arrangements. The Company evaluates loans receivable where the Company participates in residual profits through loan provisions or other contracts to ascertain whether the Company has the same risks and rewards as an owner or a joint venture partner. Where the Company concludes that such arrangements are more appropriately treated as an investment in real estate, the Company reflects such loan receivable as an equity investment in real estate under construction in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. In these cases, no interest income is recorded on the loan receivable and the Company capitalizes interest during the construction period. In arrangements where the Company engages a developer to construct a property or provides funds to a tenant to develop a property, the Company will capitalize the funds provided to the developer/tenant and internal costs of interest and real estate taxes, if applicable, during the construction period.
Revision to Previously Issued Financial Statements. During the quarter ended December 31, 2016, the Company corrected an immaterial error in the treatment of a lease termination payment received in the quarter ended June 30, 2016 in the amount of $7,685. The lease termination payment was originally amortized over the life of the new tenant lease that necessitated the lease termination. As corrected, the payment was fully recognized in the Company's total gross revenues in the quarter ended June 30, 2016.
The Company concluded that the error noted above was not material to any historical periods presented. However, in order to correctly present the treatment of the lease termination payment, management elected to revise previously issued financial statements in the Company's next subsequent periodic filing that included such financial statements. The following table shows the affected line items within the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements:
Three Months ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
As Originally Reported
 
Correction
 
As Adjusted
Total gross revenues
$
109,577

 
$
7,335

 
$
116,912

Net income
$
49,345

 
$
7,335

 
$
56,680

Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
46,830

 
$
7,045

 
$
53,875

Net income attributable to common shareholders - basic per share
$
0.20

 
$
0.03

 
$
0.23

Net income attributable to common shareholders - diluted per share
$
0.20

 
$
0.03

 
$
0.23

Six Months ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
As Originally Reported
 
Correction
 
As Adjusted
Total gross revenues
$
221,193

 
$
6,996

 
$
228,189

Net income
$
100,137

 
$
6,996

 
$
107,133

Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
94,937

 
$
6,718

 
$
101,655

Net income attributable to common shareholders - basic per share
$
0.41

 
$
0.03

 
$
0.44

Net income attributable to common shareholders - diluted per share
$
0.41

 
$
0.02

 
$
0.43

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which amends the guidance for revenue recognition to eliminate the industry-specific revenue recognition guidance and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. The effective date of the new guidance was updated by ASU 2015-14 and is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company’s revenue-producing contracts are primarily leases that are not within the scope of this standard as leases are excluded from ASU 2014-09. The Company expects that it may be impacted in its recognition of non-lease revenue, non-lease components of revenue from lease agreements (upon adoption of ASU 2016-02) and the timing of its recognition of real estate sale transactions. Under ASU 2014-09, revenue recognition for real estate sales is largely based on the transfer of control and the buyer having the ability to direct the use of, or obtain substantially all of the remaining benefit from, the asset (which generally will occur on the closing date); the factor of continuing involvement is no longer a specific consideration for the timing of recognition. As a result, the Company generally expects that the new guidance may result in transactions qualifying as sales of real estate at an earlier date than under current accounting guidance. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard but currently believes the impact would be limited to the timing and income statement presentation of revenue and not the total amount of revenue recognized over time. The

11
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

Company will adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 and anticipates using the modified retrospective with cumulative-effective transition method. As the majority of the Company’s revenue is from rental income related to leases, the Company does not expect the ASU to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize a right of use asset and related lease liability for those leases classified as operating leases at the commencement date that have lease terms of more than 12 months and amends certain lessor guidance. The ASU is expected to result in the recognition of a right-to-use asset and related liability to account for the Company's future obligations under its ground lease arrangements for which the Company is the lessee. From a lessor perspective, the Company expects that it will be required to bifurcate lease agreements to separately recognize and disclose non-lease components that are executory in nature. Lease components will continue to be primarily recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and certain non-lease components will be accounted for under the new revenue recognition guidance in ASU 2014-09 (upon adoption of ASU 2016-02). Additionally, the new ASU will require that the Company capitalize, as initial direct costs, only those costs that are incurred due to the execution of a lease. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, and requires a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements; with early adoption permitted. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the adoption of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation-Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718), which involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2017. This new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company has made an accounting policy election to account for share-based award forfeitures in compensation costs when they occur.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years; however early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which clarifies guidance on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash. The ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. Upon adoption, restricted cash balances will be included along with cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the period and beginning of period, respectively, in the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for all periods presented. Upon adoption, separate line items showing changes in restricted cash balances will be eliminated from the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business when evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects that acquisitions of real estate or in-substance real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business and thus will be treated as asset acquisitions. Acquisition costs for those acquisitions that are not businesses will be capitalized rather than expensed.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Topic 610-20), which requires that all entities account for the derecognition of a business in accordance with ASC 810, including instances in which the business is considered in-substance real estate.  The ASU requires the Company to measure at fair value any retained interest in a partial sale of real estate. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt ASU 2017-05 effective January 1, 2018, along with the adoption of ASU 2014-09, and it is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

12
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

(2)
Earnings Per Share
A portion of the Company's non-vested share-based payment awards are considered participating securities and as such, the Company is required to use the two-class method for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Under the two-class computation method, net losses are not allocated to participating securities unless the holder of the security has a contractual obligation to share in the losses. The non-vested share-based payment awards are not allocated losses as the awards do not have a contractual obligation to share in losses of the Company.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
 
Three Months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
BASIC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
5,519

 
$
53,875

 
$
45,916

 
$
101,655

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - basic
237,720,198

 
232,592,998

 
237,451,355

 
232,617,901


 

 
 
 
 

 
 

Net income attributable to common shareholders - per common share basic
$
0.02

 
0.23

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.44

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DILUTED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common shareholders - basic
$
5,519

 
$
53,875

 
$
45,916

 
$
101,655

Impact of assumed conversions
—

 
315

 
(19
)
 
628

Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
5,519

 
$
54,190

 
$
45,897

 
$
102,283

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic
237,720,198

 
232,592,998

 
237,451,355

 
232,617,901

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Share options
86,653

 
273,920

 
111,252

 
204,783

6.00% Convertible Guaranteed Notes
—

 
1,878,445

 
—

 
1,909,841

OP Units
3,724,462

 
—

 
3,747,922

 
—

Non-vested common shares
—

 
481,836

 
—

 
418,731

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted
241,531,313

 
235,227,199

 
241,310,529

 
235,151,256

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common shareholders - per common share diluted
$
0.02

 
$
0.23

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.43

For per common share amounts, all incremental shares are considered anti-dilutive for periods that have a loss from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders. In addition, other common share equivalents may be anti-dilutive in certain periods.

13
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

(3)
Investments in Real Estate and Real Estate Under Construction
The Company completed the following acquisition and build-to-suit transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2017:
Property Type
Location
Acquisition Date
Initial
Cost
Basis
Lease Expiration
Land and Land Estate
 
Building and Improvements
 
Lease in-place Value Intangible
 
Below Market Lease Intangible
Office
Lake Jackson, TX(1)
January 2017
$
70,401

10/2036
$
3,078

 
$
67,323

 
$
—

 
$
—

Industrial
New Century, KS
February 2017
12,056

01/2027
—

 
13,198

 
1,648

 
(2,790
)
Industrial
Lebanon, IN
February 2017
36,194

01/2024
2,100

 
29,443

 
4,651

 
—

Office
Charlotte, NC
April 2017
61,339

04/2032
3,771

 
47,064

 
10,504

 
—

Industrial
Cleveland, TN
May 2017
34,400

03/2024
1,871

 
29,743

 
2,786

 
—

Industrial
Grand Prairie, TX
June 2017
24,317

03/2037
3,166

 
17,985

 
3,166

 
—

Industrial
San Antonio, TX
June 2017
45,507

04/2027
1,311

 
36,644

 
7,552

 
—

 
 
 
$
284,214

 
$
15,297

 
$
241,400

 
$
30,307

 
$
(2,790
)
(1)
Completed the construction of the final building of a four-building project. Initial basis excludes estimated developer partner payout of approximately $8,000.

The Company recognized aggregate transaction costs of $488 and $214 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which are included as property operating expenses within the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The Company is engaged in various forms of build-to-suit development activities. The Company, through lender subsidiaries and property owner subsidiaries, may enter into the following acquisition, development and construction arrangements: (1) lend funds to construct a build-to-suit project subject to a single-tenant lease with an agreement to purchase the property upon completion of construction and commencement of the single-tenant lease, (2) hire a developer to construct a built-to-suit project on owned property leased to a single tenant, (3) fund the construction of a build-to-suit project on owned property pursuant to the terms of a single-tenant lease or (4) enter into a purchase and sale agreement with a developer to acquire a single-tenant build-to-suit property upon completion of construction and commencement of a single-tenant lease.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company had the following development arrangement outstanding:
Location
Property Type
Square Feet (000's)
 
Maximum Commitment/Estimated Completion Cost
 
Lease Term (Years)
 
Estimated Completion/Acquisition Date
 
GAAP Investment Balance as of 6/30/2017
Opelika, AL
Industrial
165

 
$
37,370

 
25
 
3Q 17
 
$
29,442


As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company's aggregate investment in development arrangements was $29,442 and $106,652, respectively, which included $458 and $3,442 of capitalized interest, respectively, and is presented as investments in real estate under construction in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.

14
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

In addition, as of June 30, 2017, the Company had the following forward purchase commitments:
Location
 
Square Feet (000's)
 
Property Type
 
Maximum Acquisition Cost
 
Estimated Acquisition Date
 
Approximate Lease Term (Yrs)
Warren, MI (1)
 
260

 
Industrial
 
$
47,000

 
3Q 17
 
15
Romulus, MI
 
500

 
Industrial
 
39,330

 
3Q 17
 
15
 
 
760

 
 
 
$
86,330

 
 
 
 
(1) A $4,600 letter of credit secures the Company's obligation to purchase the property.
The Company can give no assurances that any of these development arrangements or forward purchase commitments will be consummated or, if consummated, will perform to the Company's expectations.
(4)
Property Dispositions and Real Estate Impairment
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company sold its interests in various properties for an aggregate gross sales price of $151,856. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company disposed of its interest in various properties, including land investments, for an aggregate gross sales price of $166,834.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized aggregate gains on sales of properties of $44,433 and $42,341, respectively. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized debt satisfaction charges of $44 and $3,321, respectively, relating to sold properties.
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had one property and two properties, respectively, classified as held for sale.
Assets and liabilities of held for sale properties as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of the following:
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Assets:
 
 
 
Real estate, at cost
$
5,941

 
$
25,957

Real estate, intangible assets
—

 
7,789

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
—

 
(13,346
)
Rent receivable - deferred
—

 
1,715

Other assets
43

 
1,693

 
$
5,984

 
$
23,808

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Other
$
324

 
$
191

 
$
324

 
$
191

The Company assesses on a regular basis whether there are any indicators that the carrying value of its real estate assets may be impaired. Potential indicators may include an increase in vacancy at a property, tenant financial instability and the potential sale or transfer of the property in the near future. An asset is determined to be impaired if the asset's carrying value is in excess of its estimated fair value. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized aggregate impairment charges of $16,297 and $3,014, respectively, on properties sold and properties held for use.

15
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

(5)
Loans Receivable
As of June 30, 2017, all of the Company's loans receivable were fully satisfied. As of December 31, 2016, the Company's loans receivable were comprised primarily of mortgage loans on real estate.
The following is a summary of the Company's loans receivable as of December 31, 2016:
 
Loan carrying-value(1)
 
 
 
Loan
 
 
12/31/2016
 
Interest Rate
 
Maturity Date
Kennewick, WA(2)
 
 
$
85,709

 
9.00
%
 
05/2022
Oklahoma City, OK(3)
 
 
8,501

 
11.50
%
 
03/2016
 
 
 
$
94,210

 
 
 
 
(1)
Loan carrying value includes accrued interest and is net of origination costs, if any.
(2)
Loan provided for a current pay rate of 8.75%, an accrual rate of 9.0% and a balloon of $87,245 at maturity. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the loan was assigned to a third party for 94% of its principal balance. The Company recognized a $5,294 loan loss on the transaction.
(3)
In June 2015, the Company loaned a tenant-in-common $8,420. The loan was secured by the tenant-in-common's interest in an office property, in which the Company had a 40% tenant-in-common interest. The loan was satisfied in full in February 2017. The Company incurred professional fees of $376 to collect this loan. Such fees are included in general and administrative expenses on the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

(6)    Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:
 
Balance
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
Description
June 30, 2017
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Interest rate swap assets
$
600

 
$
—

 
$
600

 
$
—

Impaired real estate assets*
$
23,190

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
23,190

Interest rate swap liabilities
$
(157
)
 
$
—

 
$
(157
)
 
$
—

 
Balance
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
Description
December 31, 2016
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Interest rate swap assets
$
44

 
$
—

 
$
44

 
$
—

Impaired real estate assets*
$
15,801

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
15,801

Interest rate swap liabilities
$
(1,077
)
 
$
—

 
$
(1,077
)
 
$
—

*Represents a non-recurring fair value measurement.

16
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

The table below sets forth the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
 
As of June 30, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans Receivable
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
94,210

 
$
94,911

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Debt
$
1,827,373

 
$
1,784,714

 
$
1,860,598

 
$
1,814,824

The majority of the inputs used to value the Company's interest rate swaps fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, such as observable market interest rate curves; however, the credit valuation associated with the interest rate swaps utilizes Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company determined that the credit valuation adjustment relative to the overall fair value of the interest rate swaps was not significant. As a result, the interest rate swaps have been classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company estimates the fair value of its real estate assets, including non-consolidated real estate assets, by using income and market valuation techniques. The Company may estimate fair values using market information such as broker opinions of value, recent sale offers or discounted cash flow models, which primarily rely on Level 3 inputs. The cash flow models include estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period. These cash flows may include contractual rental revenues, projected future rental revenues and expenses and forecasted tenant improvements and lease commissions based upon market conditions determined through discussion with local real estate professionals, experience the Company has with its other owned properties in such markets and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are estimated by management based upon rates that management believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties based upon an analysis of factors such as property and tenant quality, geographical location and local supply and demand observations. To the extent the Company under estimates forecasted cash outflows (tenant improvements, lease commissions and operating costs) or over estimates forecasted cash inflows (rental revenue rates), the estimated fair value of its real estate assets could be overstated.
The Company estimated the fair values of its loans receivable utilizing Level 3 inputs by using a discounted cash flow analysis consisting of scheduled cash flows and discount rate estimates to approximate those that a willing buyer and seller might use and/or the estimated value of the underlying collateral.
The fair value of the Company's debt is primarily estimated utilizing Level 3 inputs by using a discounted cash flow analysis, based upon estimates of market interest rates, except for the Company's senior notes payable. The Company determines the fair value of its senior notes payable using market prices. The inputs used in determining the fair value of these notes are categorized as Level 1 due to the fact that the Company uses quoted market rates to value these instruments. However, the inputs used in determining the fair value could be categorized as Level 2 if trading volumes are low.
Fair values cannot be determined with precision, may not be substantiated by comparison to quoted prices in active markets and may not be realized upon sale. Additionally, there are inherent uncertainties in any fair value measurement technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates, liquidity risks and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the fair value measurement amounts.
Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable. The Company estimates that the fair value of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates carrying value due to the relatively short maturity of the instruments.

17
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

(7)
Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Entities
As of June 30, 2017, the Company had ownership interests ranging from 15% to 25% in certain non-consolidated entities, which primarily own single-tenant net-leased assets. The acquisitions of these assets by the non-consolidated entities were partially funded through non-recourse mortgage debt with an aggregate balance of $46,734 at June 30, 2017 (the Company's proportionate share was $8,411) with rates ranging from 3.7% to 4.7%.
In February 2017, the Company sold its 40% tenant-in-common interest in its Oklahoma City, Oklahoma office property for $6,198. In January 2016, the Company received $6,681 in connection with the sale of a non-consolidated office property in Russellville, Arkansas. The Company recognized gains of $1,452 and $5,378, respectively, in connection with these sales, which are included in equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $3,512 on its investment in a retail property in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida due to the bankruptcy of its tenant. This impairment charge reduced the Company's investment balance to zero.
In November 2014, the Company formed a joint venture to construct a private school in Houston, Texas. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had a 25% equity interest in the joint venture. The joint venture completed the project during 2016 for a total construction cost of $79,964. The Company was contractually obligated to provide construction financing to the joint venture up to $56,686. As of June 30, 2017, the Company's loan balance, net of origination costs, of $49,424 was included in investment in and advances to non-consolidated entities. The Houston, Texas property is net leased for a 20-year term that expires in August 2036.
(8)
Debt
The Company had the following mortgages and notes payable outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Mortgages and notes payable
$
710,608

 
$
745,173

Unamortized debt issuance costs
(6,763
)
 
(7,126
)
 
$
703,845

 
$
738,047

Interest rates, including imputed rates on mortgages and notes payable, ranged from 2.2% to 7.8% at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and all mortgages and notes payables mature between 2017 and 2036 as of June 30, 2017. The weighted-average interest rate was 4.6% at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
The Company had the following senior notes outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Issue Date
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Interest Rate
 
Maturity Date
 
Issue Price
May 2014
 
$
250,000

 
$
250,000

 
4.40
%
 
June 2024
 
99.883
%
June 2013
 
250,000

 
250,000

 
4.25
%
 
June 2023
 
99.026
%
 
 
500,000

 
500,000

 
 
 
 
 
 
Unamortized discount
 
(1,644
)
 
(1,780
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unamortized debt issuance cost
 
(3,576
)
 
(3,858
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
494,780

 
$
494,362

 
 
 
 
 
 
Each series of the senior notes is unsecured and requires payment of interest semi-annually in arrears. The Company may redeem the notes at its option at any time prior to maturity in whole or in part by paying the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus a premium.

18
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

The Company has a $905,000 unsecured credit agreement with KeyBank National Association, as agent. With lender approval, the Company can increase the size of the facility to an aggregate $1,810,000. A summary of the significant terms are as follows:
 

Maturity Date
 
Current
Interest Rate
$400,000 Revolving Credit Facility(1)
August 2019
 
LIBOR + 1.00%
$250,000 Term Loan(2)(4)
August 2020
 
LIBOR + 1.10%
$255,000 Term Loan(3)(4)
January 2021
 
LIBOR + 1.10%
(1)
Maturity date can be extended to August 2020 at the Company's option. The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.85% to 1.55%. At June 30, 2017, the revolving credit facility had no borrowings outstanding, $4,600 of letters of credit and availability of $395,400, subject to covenant compliance.
(2)
The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.90% to 1.75%. The Company previously entered into aggregate interest-rate swap agreements to fix the LIBOR component at a weighted-average rate of 1.09% through February 2018 on the $250,000 of outstanding LIBOR-based borrowings.
(3)
The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.90% to 1.75%. The Company previously entered into aggregate interest-rate swap agreements to fix the LIBOR component at a weighted-average rate of 1.42% through January 2019 on the $255,000 of outstanding LIBOR-based borrowings.
(4)
The aggregate unamortized debt issuance costs for the term loans were $3,398 and $3,907 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The Company was in compliance with all applicable financial covenants contained in its corporate level debt agreements at June 30, 2017.
During 2007, the Company issued $200,000 original principal amount of Trust Preferred Securities. The Trust Preferred Securities, which are classified as debt, are due in 2037, are open for redemption at the Company's option, bore interest at a fixed rate of 6.804% through April 2017 and bear interest at a variable rate of three month LIBOR plus 170 basis points thereafter through maturity. The interest rate at June 30, 2017 was 2.870%. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there was $129,120 original principal amount of Trust Preferred Securities outstanding and $1,974 and $2,024, respectively, of unamortized debt issuance costs.

(9)
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives. The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the type, amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company's derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company's known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company's investments and borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk. The Company's objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense, to manage its exposure to interest rate movements and therefore manage its cash outflows as it relates to the underlying debt instruments. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy relating to certain of its variable-rate debt instruments. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. The Company did not incur any ineffectiveness during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

19
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

The Company has designated the interest-rate swap agreements with its counterparties as cash flow hedges of the risk of variability attributable to changes in the LIBOR swap rate on $505,000 of LIBOR-indexed variable-rate unsecured term loans. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the swaps are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified to earnings as interest becomes receivable or payable.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the term loans. During the next 12 months, the Company estimates that an additional $167 will be reclassified as a decrease to interest expense.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
Interest Rate Derivative
Number of Instruments
Notional
Interest Rate Swaps
10
$505,000
The table below presents the fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
 
As of June 30, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair Value
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate Swap Asset
Other Assets
 
$
600

 
Other Assets
 
$
44

Interest Rate Swap Liability
Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities
 
$
(157
)
 
Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities
 
$
(1,077
)
The tables below present the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
Derivatives in Cash Flow
 
 
Amount of Income (Loss) Recognized
in OCI on Derivatives
(Effective Portion)
June 30,
 
Location of Loss
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
 
Amount of Loss Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective Portion)
June 30,
Hedging Relationships
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
2017
 
2016
Interest Rate Swaps
 
 
$
554

 
$
(7,688
)
 
Interest expense
 
$
922

 
$
2,107

The Company's agreements with swap derivative counterparties contain provisions whereby if the Company defaults on the underlying indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default of the swap derivative obligation. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had not posted any collateral related to the agreements.

20
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

(10)
Concentration of Risk
The Company seeks to reduce its operating and leasing risks through the geographic diversification of its properties, tenant industry diversification, avoidance of dependency on a single asset and the creditworthiness of its tenants. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, no single tenant represented greater than 10% of rental revenues.
Cash and cash equivalent balances at certain institutions may exceed insurable amounts. The Company believes it mitigates this risk by investing in or through major financial institutions.
(11)
Equity
Shareholders' Equity. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 1,593,603 common shares under its At-The-Market offering program and generated aggregate gross proceeds of $17,362. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company issued 577,823 common shares under its direct share purchase plan, which includes its dividend reinvestment plan, raising net proceeds of $4,115.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company granted common shares to certain employees as follows:
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
Performance Shares(1)
 
 
 
Shares granted:
 
 
 
Index - 1Q
106,706
 
404,466
Peer - 1Q
106,705
 
404,463
Index - 2Q
163,466
 
—
Peer - 2Q
163,463
 
—
 
 
 
 
Grant date fair value per share:(2)
 
 
 
Index - 1Q
$6.82
 
$4.53
Peer - 1Q
$6.34
 
$4.58
Index - 2Q
$4.05
 
—
Peer - 2Q
$4.27
 
—
 
 
 
 
Non-Vested Common Shares:(3)
 
 
 
Shares issued
237,560
 
225,090
Grant date fair value
$2,551
 
$1,724
(1)
The shares vest based on the Company's total shareholder return growth after a three-year measurement period relative to an index and a group of Company peers. Dividends will not be paid on these grants until earned. Once the performance criteria are met and the actual number of shares earned is determined, such shares vest immediately. The 2Q shares were subject to shareholder approval, which was obtained in May 2017.
(2)
The fair value of grants was determined at the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
(3)
The shares vest ratably over a three-year service period.

In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 36,136 and 35,147, respectively, of fully vested common shares to non-management members of the Company's Board of Trustees with a fair value of $382 and $273, respectively.

In July 2015, the Company's Board of Trustees authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 common shares. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company repurchased 1,184,113 common shares, at an average price of $7.56 per common share. No repurchases occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

21
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

A summary of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the Company's cash flow hedges is as follows:
 
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
(1,033
)
 
$
(1,939
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
 
554

 
(7,688
)
Amounts of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense
 
922

 
2,107

Balance at end of period
 
$
443

 
$
(7,520
)
Noncontrolling Interests. In conjunction with several of the Company's acquisitions in prior years, sellers were issued OP units as a form of consideration. All OP units, other than OP units owned by the Company, are redeemable for common shares at certain times, at the option of the holders, and are generally not otherwise mandatorily redeemable by the Company. The OP units are classified as a component of permanent equity as the Company has determined that the OP units are not redeemable securities as defined by GAAP. Each OP unit is currently redeemable at the holder's option for approximately 1.13 common shares, subject to future adjustments.
As of June 30, 2017, there were approximately 3,245,000 OP units outstanding other than OP units owned by the Company. All OP units receive distributions in accordance with the LCIF partnership agreement. To the extent that the Company's dividend per common share is less than the stated distribution per OP unit per the LCIF partnership agreement, the distributions per OP unit are reduced by the percentage reduction in the Company's dividend per common share. No OP units have a liquidation preference.
(12)
Related Party Transactions
In connection with efforts to procure non-recourse mezzanine financing from an affiliate of the Company's Chairman, pursuant to the terms of the EB-5 visa program administered by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), for a joint venture in Houston, Texas, in which the Company has an investment, the Company executed a guaranty in favor of an affiliate of its Chairman. The guaranty provides that the Company will reimburse investors providing the funds for such financing if the following occurs: (1) the joint venture receives such funds, (2) the USCIS denies the financing solely because the project is not permitted under the EB-5 visa program, and (3) the joint venture fails to return such funds.  As of June 30, 2017, the joint venture had not received any such funds and the Company had not recorded any liability related to this guaranty. The maximum amount of funds that would be subject to the guaranty obligation is $18,000.
In addition, in connection with efforts, on a non-binding basis, to procure non-recourse mezzanine financing from an affiliate of the Company's Chairman, pursuant to the terms of the EB-5 visa program administered by the USCIS, for an investment in Charlotte, North Carolina owned by LCIF, LCIF has agreed to reimburse the Chairman's affiliate up to approximately $7 for its expenses.
There were no other related party transactions other than those disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report.

22
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

(13)
Commitments and Contingencies
In addition to the commitments and contingencies disclosed elsewhere, including in Note 12 above, and previously disclosed, the Company has the following commitments and contingencies.
The Company is obligated under certain tenant leases, including its proportionate share for leases for non-consolidated entities, to fund the expansion of the underlying leased properties. The Company, under certain circumstances, may guarantee to tenants the completion of base building improvements and the payment of tenant improvement allowances and lease commissions on behalf of its subsidiaries.
The Company and LCIF are parties to a funding agreement under which the Company may be required to fund distributions made on account of LCIF's OP units. Pursuant to the funding agreement, the parties agreed that, if LCIF does not have sufficient cash available to make a quarterly distribution to its limited partners in an amount in accordance with the partnership agreement, Lexington will fund the shortfall. Payments under the agreement will be made in the form of loans to LCIF and will bear interest at prevailing rates as determined by the Company in its discretion, but no less than the applicable federal rate. LCIF's right to receive these loans will expire if no OP units remain outstanding and all such loans repaid. No amounts have been advanced under this agreement.
From time to time, the Company is directly and indirectly involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes, based on currently available information, and after consultation with legal counsel, that although the outcomes of those normal course proceedings are uncertain, the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
GSMSC II 2006-GG6 Bridgewater Hills Corporate Center, LLC v. Lexington Realty Trust (Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York-Index No. 653117/2015)
On September 16, 2015, GSMSC II 2006-GG6 Bridgewater Hills Corporate Center, LLC commenced an action as lender against the Company based on a limited guaranty of recourse obligations executed by a predecessor entity of the Company in connection with a mortgage loan secured by a property owner subsidiary's commercial property in Bridgewater, New Jersey.  The property owner subsidiary defaulted due to non-payment after the sole tenant vacated at the end of the lease term.  The lender seeks approximately $9,200 in order to satisfy the outstanding amount of the loan, plus interest, reasonable attorney’s fees and other costs and disbursements related thereto. The Company has not recorded any liability relating to this litigation as of June 30, 2017 as the Company believes that a loss contingency is “reasonably possible” (as defined by FASB ASC 450-20-20) but not “probable” (as defined by FASB ASC 450-20-20).
The lender claims that the Company's limited guaranty was triggered due to the merger of Newkirk Realty Trust, Inc. and Lexington Corporate Properties Trust on December 31, 2006, arguing that it constituted an event of default because it was a transfer that was not permitted by the loan agreement. The limited guaranty provides that the guarantor's liability for the guaranteed obligations shall not exceed $10,000, which the Company believes is its maximum exposure to loss. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lender’s claim.  The Company filed a motion to dismiss, which was generally denied. The parties are presently in the discovery phase, with document productions ongoing and with fact and expert depositions currently expected to be conducted and completed later this year.
The lender also brought a foreclosure action against the property owner subsidiary. A foreclosure sale was held September 13, 2016 and the lender acquired the property for a nominal amount.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred $1,895 in legal costs relating to this litigation, which are included in general and administrative expense on the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

23
Table of Contents

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit and per share/unit data)

(14)
Supplemental Disclosure of Statement of Cash Flow Information
In addition to disclosures discussed elsewhere, during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company paid $38,705 and $44,641, respectively, for interest and $1,278 and $855, respectively, for income taxes.
In April 2016, the Company sold its interest in a land investment, which included the assumption of $29,193 of related non-recourse mortgage debt.
(15)
Subsequent Events
Subsequent to June 30, 2017 and in addition to disclosures elsewhere in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company sold:
•two properties to unrelated third parties for an aggregate gross sales price of $7,662;
•acquired an industrial property located in McDonough, Georgia for $66,700; and
•borrowed $70,000 under its revolving credit facility.

24
Table of Contents



LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited and in thousands)

 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Assets:
 
 
 
Real estate, at cost
$
775,910

 
$
731,202

Real estate - intangible assets
114,134

 
104,761

Investment in real estate under construction
—

 
40,443

 
890,044

 
876,406

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
232,417

 
236,930

Real estate, net
657,627

 
639,476

Cash and cash equivalents
24,404

 
52,031

Restricted cash
1,540

 
1,545

Investment in and advances to non-consolidated entities
6,374

 
5,526

Deferred expenses, net
6,727

 
5,070

Rent receivable - current
465

 
358

Rent receivable - deferred
19,710

 
17,449

Related party advances, net
—

 
5,967

Other assets
2,400

 
1,182

Total assets
$
719,247

 
$
728,604

 
 
 
 
Liabilities and Partners' Capital:
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Mortgages and notes payable, net
$
168,737

 
$
169,212

Co-borrower debt
103,165

 
146,404

Related party advances, net
6,414

 
—

Accounts payable and other liabilities
6,220

 
3,559

Accrued interest payable
664

 
673

Deferred revenue - including below market leases, net
904

 
1,003

Distributions payable
33,203

 
16,916

Prepaid rent
3,388

 
3,214

Total liabilities
322,695

 
340,981

 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies

 

Partners' capital
396,552

 
387,623

Total liabilities and partners' capital
$
719,247

 
$
728,604



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


25
Table of Contents


LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited and in thousands, except unit data)

 
 
Three Months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Gross revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental
 
$
18,691

 
$
38,557

 
$
35,999

 
$
70,152

Tenant reimbursements
 
1,955

 
2,215

 
3,928

 
4,720

Total gross revenues
 
20,646

 
40,772

 
39,927

 
74,872

Expense applicable to revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
(9,209
)
 
(8,171
)
 
(18,381
)
 
(17,609
)
Property operating
 
(3,042
)
 
(3,506
)
 
(6,599
)
 
(7,708
)
General and administrative
 
(1,853
)
 
(2,396
)
 
(3,292
)
 
(4,469
)
Non-operating income
 
3

 
255

 
232

 
255

Interest and amortization expense
 
(3,932
)
 
(8,410
)
 
(7,339
)
 
(16,726
)
Debt satisfaction charges, net
 
—

 
(1,615
)
 
—

 
(1,615
)
Impairment charges
 
(2,762
)
 
(2,426
)
 
(5,259
)
 
(2,426
)
Gains on sales of properties
 
—

 
8,190

 
—

 
16,029

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities
 
(149
)
 
22,693

 
(711
)
 
40,603

Provision for income taxes
 
(18
)
 
(6
)
 
(26
)
 
(25
)
Equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities
 
159

 
67

 
259

 
203

Net income (loss)
 
$
(8
)
 
$
22,754

 
$
(478
)
 
$
40,781

Net income (loss) per unit
 
$
—

 
$
0.27

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.49

Weighted-average units outstanding
 
83,241,396

 
83,241,396

 
83,241,396

 
83,241,396


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


26
Table of Contents


LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited and in thousands, except unit amounts)

Six Months ended June 30, 2017
 
Units
 
Partners' Capital
Balance December 31, 2016
 
83,241,396

 
$
387,623

Changes in co-borrower debt allocation
 
—

 
43,239

Distributions
 
—

 
(33,832
)
Net loss
 
—

 
(478
)
Balance June 30, 2017
 
83,241,396

 
$
396,552

 
 
 
 
 
Six Months ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
Balance December 31, 2015
 
83,241,396

 
$
461,657

Changes in co-borrower debt allocation
 
—

 
(21,505
)
Distributions
 
—

 
(32,986
)
Net income
 
—

 
40,781

Balance June 30, 2016
 
83,241,396

 
$
447,947


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


27
Table of Contents


LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited and in thousands)
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
21,180

 
$
25,402

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Acquisition of real estate, including intangible assets
(24,317
)
 
—

Investments in real estate under construction
(20,894
)
 
(14,936
)
Capital expenditures
(3,814
)
 
(570
)
Net proceeds from the sale of properties
7,106

 
69,038

Investment in and advances to non-consolidated entities
(1,067
)
 
—

Distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings
219

 
285

Increase in deferred leasing costs
(339
)
 
(505
)
Change in restricted cash
5

 
(460
)
Real estate deposits
(17
)
 
—

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(43,118
)
 
52,852

Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Distributions to partners
(17,545
)
 
(33,707
)
Principal amortization payments
(525
)
 
(735
)
Increase in deferred financing costs
—

 
(79
)
Principal payments on debt, excluding normal amortization
—

 
(23,934
)
Co-borrower debt payment
—

 
(15,000
)
Related party advances (payments), net
12,381

 
497

Net cash used in financing activities
(5,689
)
 
(72,958
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
(27,627
)
 
5,296

Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
52,031

 
19,130

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
$
24,404

 
$
24,426


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


28
Table of Contents
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit data)


(1)    The Partnership and Financial Statement Presentation

Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, except when the context only applies to the parent entity, the “Partnership”) was organized in 1986 as a limited partnership under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. The Partnership's sole general partner, Lex GP-1 Trust (the “General Partner”), is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lexington Realty Trust (“Lexington”). The Partnership serves as an operating partnership subsidiary for Lexington. As of June 30, 2017, Lexington, through Lex LP-1 Trust, a wholly-owned subsidiary, and the General Partner, owned approximately 96% of the outstanding units of the Partnership.

As of June 30, 2017, the Partnership had ownership interests in 33 consolidated real estate properties, located in 21 states. The properties in which the Partnership has an interest are leased to tenants in various industries.

The assets and credit of each property owner subsidiary of the Partnership with a property subject to a mortgage loan are not available to creditors to satisfy the debt and the other obligations of any other person, including any other property owner subsidiary of the Partnership or any other affiliate. Consolidated entities that are not property owner subsidiaries do not directly own any of the assets of a property owner subsidiary (or the general partner, member or managing member of such property owner subsidiary), but merely hold partnership, membership or beneficial interests therein, which interests are subordinate to the claims of such property owner subsidiary's (or its general partner's, member's or managing member's) creditors.

The financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Quarterly Report”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 have been prepared by the Partnership in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, the interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results of the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Partnership's audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on March 1, 2017 (“Annual Report”).

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation. The Partnership's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with GAAP. The financial statements reflect the accounts of the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Partnership consolidates its wholly-owned subsidiaries, partnerships and joint ventures which it controls (i) through voting rights or similar rights or (ii) by means other than voting rights if the Partnership is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). Entities that the Partnership does not control and entities that are VIEs in which the Partnership is not the primary beneficiary are accounted for under appropriate GAAP.

Earnings Per Unit. Net income (loss) per unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of units outstanding during the period. There are no potential dilutive securities.

Unit Redemptions. The Partnership's limited partner units that are issued and outstanding, other than those held by Lexington, are currently redeemable at certain times, only at the option of the holders, for shares of beneficial interests classified as common stock of Lexington, par value $0.0001 per share ("common shares"), on a one to approximately 1.13 basis, subject to future adjustments. These units are not mandatorily redeemable by the Partnership. As of June 30, 2017, Lexington's common shares had a closing price of $9.91 per share. The estimated fair value of these units was $36,214, assuming all outstanding limited partner units not held by Lexington were redeemed on such date.
 
Allocation of Overhead Expenses. The Partnership does not pay a fee to the General Partner for the day-to-day management of the Partnership. Certain expenses incurred by the General Partner and its affiliates, including Lexington, such as corporate-level interest, amortization of deferred loan costs, payroll and general and administrative expenses are allocated to the Partnership and reimbursed to the General Partner in accordance with the Partnership's partnership agreement. The allocation is based upon gross rental revenues.

29
Table of Contents
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit data)


Distributions; Allocations of Income and Loss. As provided in the Partnership's partnership agreement, distributions and income and loss for financial reporting purposes are allocated to the partners based on their ownership of units. Special allocation rules included in the partnership agreement affect the allocation of taxable income and loss. The Partnership paid or accrued gross distributions of $33,832 ($0.41 per weighted-average unit) and $32,986 ($0.40 per weighted-average unit) to its partners during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Certain units owned indirectly by Lexington are entitled to aggregate annual distributions of $3.25 per unit.
 
Use of Estimates. The Partnership has made a number of significant estimates and assumptions to prepare these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, including, among others, relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based on management's best estimates and judgment. The Partnership evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors. The Partnership adjusts such estimates when facts and circumstances dictate. The most significant estimates made include the recoverability of accounts receivable, allocation of property purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the determination of VIEs and which entities should be consolidated, the determination of impairment of long-lived assets and equity method investments and the useful lives of long-lived assets. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
 
Fair Value Measurements. The Partnership follows the guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“Topic 820”), to determine the fair value of financial and non-financial instruments. Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 - observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 - unobservable inputs, which are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Partnership utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as considering counterparty credit risk.

Acquisition, Development and Construction Arrangements. The Partnership evaluates loans receivable where the Partnership participates in residual profits through loan provisions or other contracts to ascertain whether the Partnership has the same risks and rewards as an owner or a joint venture partner. Where the Partnership concludes that such arrangements are more appropriately treated as an investment in real estate, the Partnership reflects such loan receivable as an equity investment in real estate under construction in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. In these cases, no interest income is recorded on the loan receivable and the Partnership records capitalized interest during the construction period. In arrangements where the Partnership engages a developer to construct a property or provide funds to a tenant to develop a property, the Partnership will capitalize the funds provided to the developer/tenant and internal costs of interest and real estate taxes, if applicable, during the construction period.

Co-borrower Debt. The Partnership is subject to ASC 405-40, which requires recognition of such obligations as the sum of (a) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and (b) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors.
Revision to Previously Issued Financial Statements. During the quarter ended December 31, 2016, the Partnership corrected an immaterial error in the treatment of a lease termination payment received in the quarter of June 30, 2016 in the amount of $7,685. The lease termination payment was originally amortized over the life of the new tenant lease that necessitated the lease termination. As corrected, the payment was fully recognized in the Partnership's total gross revenues in the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

30
Table of Contents
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit data)

The Partnership concluded that the error noted above was not material to any historical periods presented. However, in order to correctly present the treatment of the lease termination payment, management elected to revise previously issued financial statements in the Partnership's next subsequent periodic filing that included such financial statements. The following table shows the affected line items within the Partnership's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements:
For the three months ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
As Originally Reported
 
Correction
 
As Adjusted
Total gross revenues
$
33,437

 
$
7,335

 
$
40,772

Net income
$
15,907

 
$
6,847

 
$
22,754

Net income per unit
$
0.19

 
$
0.08

 
$
0.27

For the six months ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
As Originally Reported
 
Correction
 
As Adjusted
Total gross revenues
$
67,876

 
$
6,996

 
$
74,872

Net income
$
34,249

 
$
6,532

 
$
40,781

Net income per unit
$
0.41

 
$
0.08

 
$
0.49

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which amends the guidance for revenue recognition to eliminate the industry-specific revenue recognition guidance and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. The effective date of the new guidance was updated by ASU 2015-14 and is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Partnership’s revenue-producing contracts are primarily leases that are not within the scope of this standard as leases are excluded from ASU 2014-09. The Partnership expects that it may be impacted in its recognition of non-lease revenue, non-lease components of revenue from lease agreements (upon adoption of ASU 2016-02) and the timing of its recognition of real estate sale transactions. Under ASU 2014-09, revenue recognition for real estate sales is largely based on the transfer of control and the buyer having the ability to direct the use of, or obtain substantially all of the remaining benefit from, the asset (which generally will occur on the closing date); the factor of continuing involvement is no longer a specific consideration for the timing of recognition. As a result, the Partnership generally expects that the new guidance may result in transactions qualifying as sales of real estate at an earlier date than under current accounting guidance. The Partnership is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard but currently believes the impact would be limited to the timing and income statement presentation of revenue and not the total amount of revenue recognized over time. The Partnership will adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 and anticipates using the modified retrospective with cumulative-effective transition method. As the majority of the Partnership’s revenue is from rental income related to leases, the Partnership does not expect the ASU to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize a right of use asset and related lease liability for those leases classified as operating leases at the commencement date that have lease terms of more than 12 months and amends certain lessor guidance. The ASU is expected to result in the recognition of a right-to-use asset and related liability to account for the Partnership's future obligations under its ground lease arrangements for which the Partnership is the lessee. From a lessor perspective, the Partnership expects that it will be required to bifurcate lease agreements to separately recognize and disclose non-lease components that are executory in nature. Lease components will continue to be primarily recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and certain non-lease components will be accounted for under the new revenue recognition guidance in ASU 2014-09 (upon adoption of ASU 2016-02). Additionally, the new ASU will require that the Partnership capitalize, as initial direct costs, only those costs that are incurred due to the execution of a lease. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, and requires a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements;

31
Table of Contents
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit data)

with early adoption permitted. The Partnership continues to evaluate the impact of the adoption of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years; however early adoption is permitted. The Partnership does not believe this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which clarifies guidance on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash. The ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. Upon adoption, restricted cash balances will be included along with cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the period and beginning of period, respectively, in the Partnership's unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for all periods presented. Upon adoption, separate line items showing changes in restricted cash balances will be eliminated from the Partnership's consolidated statement of cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business when evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership expects that acquisitions of real estate or in-substance real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business and thus will be treated as asset acquisitions. Acquisition costs for those acquisitions that are not businesses will be capitalized rather than expensed.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Topic 610-20), which requires that all entities account for the derecognition of a business in accordance with ASC 810, including instances in which the business is considered in-substance real estate. The ASU requires the Partnership to measure at fair value any retained interest in a partial sale of real estate. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Partnership will adopt ASU 2017-05 effective January 1, 2018, along with ASU 2014-09, and it is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
(2)     Investment in Real Estate and Real Estate Under Construction

The Partnership completed the following acquisitions and build-to-suit arrangements during the six months ended June 30, 2017:
Property Type
Location
Acquisition Date
Initial
Cost
Basis
Lease Expiration
Land and Land Estate
 
Building and Improvements
 
Lease in-place Value Intangible
Office
Charlotte, NC
April 2017
$
61,339

04/2032
$
3,771

 
$
47,064

 
$
10,504

Industrial
Grand Prairie, TX
June 2017
24,317

03/2037
3,166

 
17,985

 
3,166

 
 
 
$
85,656

 
$
6,937

 
$
65,049

 
$
13,670


During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership sold its interest in two vacant office properties for an aggregate gross sale price of $7,591 and recognized aggregate impairment charges of $5,259. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Partnership sold its interest in certain properties, including land investments, for an aggregate gross sale price of $103,265. The Partnership recognized aggregate gains on sales of properties of $16,029 and aggregate debt satisfaction charges of $1,615 relating to sold properties during the six months ended June 30, 2016.


32
Table of Contents
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit data)

The Partnership assesses on a regular basis whether there are any indicators that the carrying value of its real estate assets may be impaired. Potential indicators may include an increase in vacancy at a property, tenant financial instability and the potential sale or transfer of the property in the near future. An asset is determined to be impaired if the asset's carrying value is in excess of its estimated fair value. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Partnership recognized impairment charges of $2,426. The Partnership determined that the expected undiscounted cash flows based upon the revised estimated holding period of a held for sale asset were below its carrying value.
(3)    Investments in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Entities

In July 2014, the Partnership acquired a 1.0% interest in an office property in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for $263. The Partnership accounts for this investment under the cost basis of accounting.
On September 1, 2012, the Partnership acquired a 2% equity interest in Net Lease Strategic Assets Fund L.P. (“NLS”) for cash of $189 and the issuance of 457,211 limited partner units to Lexington.
The Partnership's carrying value in NLS at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $6,072 and $5,224, respectively. The Partnership recognized net income from NLS of $251 and $193 in equity in earnings from non-consolidated entities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Partnership contributed $1,067 to NLS during the six months ended June 30, 2017. In addition, the Partnership received distributions of $470 and $478 from NLS during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(4)    Fair Value Measurements

The table below sets forth the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Partnership's financial instruments as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
 
As of June 30, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt
 
$
271,902

 
$
270,758

 
$
315,616

 
$
314,509


The fair value of the Partnership's debt is primarily estimated utilizing Level 3 inputs by using an estimated discounted cash flow analysis, based upon estimates of market interest rates.

Fair values cannot be determined with precision, may not be substantiated by comparison to quoted prices in active markets and may not be realized upon sale. Additionally, there are inherent uncertainties in any fair value measurement technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates, liquidity risks and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the fair value measurement amounts.
 
Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable. The Partnership estimates that the fair value of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates carrying value due to the relatively short maturity of the instruments.

(5)    Mortgages and Notes Payable and Co-Borrower Debt

The Partnership had the following mortgages and notes payable outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Mortgages and notes payable
$
169,432

 
$
169,958

Unamortized debt issuance costs
(695
)
 
(746
)
 
$
168,737

 
$
169,212


33
Table of Contents
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit data)

Interest rates, including imputed rates, ranged from 4.0% to 6.5% at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and the mortgages and notes payable mature between 2019 and 2026. The weighted-average interest rate at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was approximately 4.7%.

Lexington, and the Partnership as co-borrower, have a $905,000 unsecured credit agreement with KeyBank National Association, as agent. With lender approval, Lexington can increase the size of the facility to an aggregate $1,810,000. A summary of the significant terms are as follows:
 
Maturity Date
 
Current
Interest Rate
$400,000 Revolving Credit Facility(1)
August 2019
 
LIBOR + 1.00%
$250,000 Term Loan(2)
August 2020
 
LIBOR + 1.10%
$255,000 Term Loan(3)
January 2021
 
LIBOR + 1.10%
(1)
Maturity date can be extended to August 2020 at the Lexington's option. The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.85% to 1.55%. At June 30, 2017, the revolving credit facility had no borrowings outstanding, $4,600 of letters of credit and availability of $395,400 subject to covenant compliance.
(2)
The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.90% to 1.75%. Interest-rate swap agreements were previously entered into to fix the LIBOR component at a weighted-average rate of 1.09% through February 2018 on the $250,000 of outstanding LIBOR-based borrowings.
(3)
The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.90% to 1.75%. Interest-rate swap agreements were previously entered into to fix the LIBOR component at a weighted-average rate of 1.42% through January 2019 on the $255,000 of outstanding LIBOR-based borrowings.

Lexington was in compliance with all applicable financial covenants contained in its corporate level debt agreements at June 30, 2017.
In accordance with the guidance of ASC 405-40, the Partnership, as it is a co-borrower with Lexington, recognizes a proportion of the outstanding amounts of the above-mentioned term loans and revolving credit facility as co-borrower debt in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balances sheets. In accordance with the Partnership’s partnership agreement, the Partnership is allocated a portion of these debts based on gross rental revenues, which represents its agreed to obligation. The Partnership's allocated co-borrower debt was $103,165 and $146,404 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Non-cash changes in co-borrower debt are recognized in partners’ capital in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of changes in partners’ capital.
(6)    Concentration of Risk

Subject to the terms of the partnership agreement, the Partnership seeks to reduce its operating and leasing risks through the geographic diversification of its properties, tenant industry diversification, avoidance of dependency on a single asset and the creditworthiness of its tenants. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the following tenants represented greater than 10% of rental revenues:
 
 
2017
 
2016
Preferred Freezer Services of Richland, LLC
 
18.2
%
 
N/A

SM Ascott LLC(1)
 
N/A

 
12.4
%
Tribeca Ascott LLC(1)
 
N/A

 
10.6
%
TD Auto Finance LLC(2)
 
N/A

 
11.4
%
(1)
The Partnership net leased these individual land parcels to the tenants under non-cancellable 99-year (original term) leases. The improvements on these parcels are owned by the tenants and consist of three high-rise hotels located in New York, NY. The Partnership sold these assets in September 2016.
(2)
The Partnership received a lease termination payment of $7,685 in April 2016.
 
Cash and cash equivalent balances at certain institutions may exceed insurable amounts. The Partnership believes it mitigates this risk by investing in or through major financial institutions.


34
Table of Contents
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit data)

(7)    Related Party Transactions

The Partnership had the following related party transactions in addition to related party transactions discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report.
The Partnership had outstanding net advances owed from (to) Lexington of $(6,414) and $5,967 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The advances are payable on demand.
Lexington earned distributions of $32,595 and $31,752 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Partnership was allocated interest expense by Lexington, in accordance with the partnership agreement, relating to certain lending facilities of $3,854 and $6,791 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Lexington, on behalf of the General Partner, pays for certain general administrative and other costs on behalf of the Partnership from time to time. These costs are reimbursable by the Partnership. These costs were approximately $3,211 and $4,579 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 A Lexington affiliate provides property management services for certain Partnership properties. The Partnership recognized property operating expenses of $330 and $403 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for aggregate fees and reimbursements charged by the affiliate.
(8)    Commitments and Contingencies

In addition to the commitments and contingencies disclosed elsewhere, the Partnership has the following commitments and contingencies.
The Partnership is obligated under certain tenant leases, including its proportionate share for leases for non-consolidated entities, to fund the expansion of the underlying leased properties. The Partnership, under certain circumstances, may guarantee to tenants the completion of base building improvements and the payment of tenant improvement allowances and lease commissions on behalf of its subsidiaries.
The Partnership and Lexington are parties to a funding agreement under which Lexington may be required to fund distributions made on account of OP units. Pursuant to the funding agreement, if the Partnership does not have sufficient cash available to make a quarterly distribution to its limited partners in an amount in accordance with the partnership agreement, Lexington is required to fund the shortfall. Payments under the agreement will be made in the form of loans to the Partnership and will bear interest at prevailing rates as determined by Lexington in its discretion, but no less than the applicable federal rate. The Partnership's right to receive these loans will expire if no OP units remain outstanding and all such loans are repaid. No amounts had been advanced under this funding agreement.
In May 2014, the Partnership guaranteed $250,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.40% Senior Notes due 2024 (“2024 Senior Notes”) issued by Lexington at an issuance price of 99.883% of the principal amount and in June 2013, the Partnership guaranteed $250,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2023 (“2023 Senior Notes”) issued by Lexington at an issuance price of 99.026% of the principal amount, collectively referred to as the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are unsecured and pay interest semi-annually in arrears. Lexington may redeem the Senior Notes at its option at any time prior to maturity in whole or in part by paying the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus a premium.
From time to time, the Partnership is directly or indirectly involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of the Partnership's business. The Partnership believes, based on currently available information, and after consultation with legal counsel, that although the outcomes of those normal course proceedings are uncertain, the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's business, financial condition and results of operations.

35
Table of Contents
LEPERCQ CORPORATE INCOME FUND L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share/unit data)

(9)    Supplemental Disclosure of Statement of Cash Flow Information

In addition to disclosures discussed elsewhere, during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Partnership paid $7,578 and $15,483, respectively, for interest and $194 and $58, respectively, for income taxes.
In April 2016, the Partnership sold its interest in a land investment, which included the assumption of $29,193 of related non-recourse mortgage debt.

36
Table of Contents


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction

When we use the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our,” we mean Lexington Realty Trust and all entities owned by us, including non-consolidated entities, except where it is clear that the term means only Lexington Realty Trust. When we use the terms the “Partnership” or “LCIF”, we mean Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P. and all entities owned by it, including non-consolidated entities, except where it is clear that the term means only LCIF. References herein to ‘‘this Quarterly Report” are to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. The results of operations contained herein for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year.

The following is a discussion and analysis of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Lexington Realty Trust and LCIF for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and significant factors that could affect their prospective financial condition and results of operations. This discussion should be read together with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and the Partnership included herein and notes thereto and with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's and the Partnership's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 1, 2017, which we refer to as the Annual Report. Historical results may not be indicative of future performance.

Forward-Looking Statements. This Quarterly Report, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “may,” “plans,” “predicts,” “will,” “will likely result” or similar expressions. Readers should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. In particular, the factors that could cause actual results, performances or achievements to differ materially from current expectations, strategies or plans include, among others, any risks discussed below in the respective “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and under the headings “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report and “Risk Factors” and “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report and other periodic reports filed by the Company or the Partnership with the SEC. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Accordingly, there is no assurance that our expectations will be realized.

Lexington Realty Trust:

Overview

General. We are a Maryland real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns a diversified portfolio of equity investments in single-tenant commercial properties.
As of June 30, 2017, we had ownership interests in approximately 185 consolidated real estate properties, located in 38 states and containing an aggregate of approximately 43.9 million square feet of space, approximately 98.1% of which was leased, excluding properties subject to secured mortgage loans currently in default. The properties in which we have an interest are primarily net leased to tenants in various industries.
Our revenues and cash flows are generated predominantly from property rent receipts. As a result, growth in revenues and cash flows is directly correlated to our ability to (1) acquire income producing real estate investments and (2) re-lease properties that are vacant, or may become vacant, at favorable rental rates.
Our current business strategy is focused on enhancing our cash flow growth and stability, growing our portfolio with attractive leased investments, reducing lease rollover risk and maintaining a strong and flexible balance sheet to allow us to act on opportunities as they arise. To that end, in the first two quarters of 2017, we continued to be an active seller of non-core assets such as vacant properties and properties subject to short-term leases and we have invested proceeds in predominantly build-to-suit projects, which have long-term leases, and industrial assets.

37
Table of Contents


Leasing Activity. Re-leasing properties that are currently vacant or as leases expire at favorable effective rates is one of our primary areas of focus for asset management. We strive to manage down our shorter-term leases and extend our weighted-average lease term on a cash basis, which was approximately 9.0 years at June 30, 2017 on a cash basis. Our weighted-average lease term at June 30, 2016 was 12.5 years on a cash basis, or 9.3 years, adjusted to reflect the four sold New York, New York land investments, which were subject to 99-year leases, through the first option date.
During the second quarter of 2017, we entered into new leases and lease extensions encompassing approximately 1.4 million square feet. The average U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, base rent on these extended leases was $8.03 per square foot compared to the average GAAP base rent on these leases before extension of $7.73 per square foot. The weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions was $0.69 per square foot for new leases and $5.16 per square foot for extended leases on a GAAP basis.
Second Quarter 2017 Transaction Summary.
The following summarizes our significant transactions during the three months ended June 30, 2017.
Investments:
•
Acquired three industrial properties for an aggregate cost of $104.2 million. The properties are net leased for an approximate 11.0 year term.
•
Completed the construction of the Charlotte, North Carolina office build-to-suit project for $61.3 million.
•
Committed to acquire an industrial property in Romulus, Michigan for $39.3 million.
Capital Recycling:
•
Disposed of our interests in various consolidated properties for approximately $59.1 million.
Debt:
•
Satisfied an aggregate of $19.8 million of nonrecourse mortgage debt.
Acquisition and Development Activity.
Our acquisition and development activity for the past several years has consisted primarily of build-to-suit transactions whereby we (1) hire a developer, or provide funding to a tenant, to develop a property, or (2) provide capital to developers and commit to purchase the property upon completion. However, none of these transactions are done on a speculative basis without a committed tenant subject to a long-term lease.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we completed the following acquisition and build-to-suit transactions:
Location
 
Property Type
 
Square Feet (000's)
 
Capitalized Cost (millions)
 
Date Acquired
 
Approximate Lease Term (Years)
Lake Jackson, TX (1)
 
Office
 
275

 
$
70.4

 
January 2017
 
20
Lebanon, IN
 
Industrial
 
742

 
36.2

 
February 2017
 
7
New Century, KS
 
Industrial
 
447

 
12.1

 
February 2017
 
10
Charlotte, NC
 
Office
 
201

 
61.3

 
April 2017
 
15
Cleveland, TN
 
Industrial
 
851

 
34.4

 
May 2017
 
7
Grand Prairie, TX
 
Industrial
 
215

 
24.3

 
June 2017
 
20
San Antonio, TX
 
Industrial
 
849

 
45.5

 
June 2017
 
10
 
 
 
 
3,580

 
$
284.2

 
 
 
 
(1)
Completed the construction of the final building of a four-building project. Capitalized cost excludes estimated developer partner payout of approximately $8.0 million.

38
Table of Contents



The following is a summary of our on-going build-to-suit transaction as of June 30, 2017:
Location
 
Property Type
 
Square Feet (000's)
Maximum Commitment/Estimated Completion Cost (millions)
 
Estimated Completion/Acquisition Date
 
GAAP Investment Balance as of 6/30/2017
(millions)
Opelika, AL
 
Industrial
 
165

 
$
37.4

 
3Q 2017
 
$
29.4


In addition, as of June 30, 2017, we had the following forward purchase commitments:
Location
 
Square Feet (000's)
 
Property Type
 
Maximum Acquisition Cost (millions)
 
Estimated Acquisition Date
 
Approximate Lease Term (Yrs)
Warren, MI (1)
 
260

 
Industrial
 
$
47.0

 
3Q 17
 
15
Romulus, MI
 
500

 
Industrial
 
39.3

 
3Q 17
 
15
 
 
760

 
 
 
$
86.3

 
 
 
 
(1) A $4.6 million letter of credit secures our obligation to purchase the property.

We can give no assurances that any unconsummated transactions described in this Quarterly Report will be consummated or, if consummated, will perform to our expectations.

Critical Accounting Policies
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. In preparing our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, we make assumptions, judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On a regular basis, we evaluate our assumptions, judgments and estimates. Certain of our accounting policies are discussed under (1) Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report, (2) note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report and (3) note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report. We believe there have been no material changes to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies under Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows. We believe that cash flows from operations will continue to provide adequate capital to fund our operating and administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations and all dividend payments in accordance with applicable REIT requirements in both the short-term and long-term. In addition, we anticipate that cash on hand, borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, capital recycling proceeds, issuances of equity, mortgage proceeds and other debt, as well as other available alternatives, will provide the necessary capital required by our business.
At June 30, 2017, we had $43.7 million and $6.6 million of property specific mortgage balloon debt due in 2017 and 2018, respectively.Three of the 2017 non-recourse maturities aggregating $22.0 million were in maturity default at June 30, 2017. We believe we have sufficient sources of liquidity to meet obligations we are required to meet through cash on hand ($93.3 million at June 30, 2017), property sale proceeds, borrowing capacity under our unsecured revolving credit facility ($395.4 million at June 30, 2017), which expires in 2019, but can be extended by us to 2020, and future cash flows from operations.
The mortgages encumbering the properties in which we have an interest are generally non-recourse to us, such that in situations where we believe it is beneficial to satisfy a mortgage obligation by transferring title of the property to the lender, including through a foreclosure, we may do so.

39
Table of Contents


Cash flows from operations were $106.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to $116.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily related to the impact of property sales and vacancies, a decrease in lease termination payments and an increase in payments of legal costs, offset by cash flows generated from acquired properties. The underlying drivers that impact our working capital, and therefore cash flows from operations, are the timing of collection of rents, including reimbursements from tenants, payment of interest on mortgage debt and payment of operating and general and administrative costs. We believe the net-lease structure of the leases encumbering a majority of the properties in which we have an interest mitigates the risks of the timing of cash flows from operations since the payment and timing of operating costs related to the properties are generally borne directly by the tenant. Collection and timing of tenant rents is closely monitored by management as part of our cash management program.
Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $4.8 million and $13.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash provided by investing activities related primarily to proceeds from the sale of properties, collection of loans receivable and changes in real estate deposits, net. Cash used in investing activities related primarily to acquisitions of real estate and investments in real estate under construction, capital expenditures, lease costs, changes in restricted cash and investments in and advances to non-consolidated entities.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $104.1 million and $164.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to dividend and distribution payments, payment of developer liabilities, repayment of debt obligations and repurchase of common shares. Cash provided by financing activities related primarily to proceeds of mortgages and notes payable and the net proceeds from the issuance of common shares.
Dividends. Dividends paid to our common and preferred shareholders were $85.9 million and $82.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
UPREIT Structure. As of June 30, 2017, 3.2 million units of limited partner interests, or OP units, in our operating partnership, LCIF, were outstanding not including OP units held by us. Assuming all outstanding OP units not held by us were redeemed on such date, the estimated fair value of such OP units was $36.2 million based on our closing price of $9.91 per common share on June 30, 2017 and a redemption factor of approximately 1.13 common shares per OP unit.
Financings. The following senior notes were outstanding as of June 30, 2017:
Issue Date
 
Face Amount ($000)
 
Interest Rate
 
Maturity Date
 
Issue Price
May 2014
 
$
250,000

 
4.40
%
 
June 2024
 
99.883
%
June 2013
 
250,000

 
4.25
%
 
June 2023
 
99.026
%
 
 
$
500,000

 
 
 
 
 
 
The senior notes are unsecured and pay interest semi-annually in arrears. We may redeem the senior notes at our option at any time prior to maturity in whole or in part by paying the principal amount of the senior notes being redeemed plus a premium.

40
Table of Contents


We have a $905.0 million unsecured credit agreement with KeyBank National Association, as agent. With lender approval, we can increase the size of the facility to an aggregate $1.8 billion. A summary of the significant terms are as follows:
 

Maturity Date
 
Current
Interest Rate
$400.0 Million Revolving Credit Facility(1)
 August 2019
 
LIBOR + 1.00%
$250.0 Million Term Loan(2)
August 2020
 
LIBOR + 1.10%
$255.0 Million Term Loan(3)
January 2021
 
LIBOR + 1.10%
(1)
Maturity date can be extended to August 2020 at our option. The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.85% to 1.55%. At June 30, 2017, the unsecured revolving credit facility had no borrowings outstanding, $4.6 million of letters of credit, and availability of $395.4 million subject to covenant compliance.
(2)
The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.90% to 1.75%. We previously entered into aggregate interest-rate swap agreements to fix the LIBOR component at a weighted-average rate of 1.09% through February 2018 on the $250.0 million of outstanding LIBOR-based borrowings.
(3)
The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.90% to 1.75%. We previously entered into aggregate interest-rate swap agreements to fix the LIBOR component at a weighted-average rate of 1.42% through January 2019 on the $255.0 million of outstanding LIBOR-based borrowings.

As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with all applicable financial covenants contained in our corporate level debt agreements.
Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 2017 compared with three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in net income attributable to common shareholders of $48.4 million was primarily due to the items discussed below.
The decrease in total gross revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2017 of $21.2 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in rental revenue. Rental revenue decreased $21.4 million primarily due to an $18.8 million decrease in revenue from sold properties, primarily the New York City land investments, a $10.3 million decrease in termination income and a $1.8 million decrease in revenue from certain held properties due to changes in occupancy, partially offset by 2017 and 2016 property acquisitions rental revenue of $9.5 million.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $1.0 million was primarily due to acquisitions of certain properties.
The increase in property operating expense of $1.7 million was primarily due to costs incurred on properties acquired in 2017 and 2016, costs incurred on vacant properties prior to sale and an increase in acquisition costs, offset in part by reduced operating costs associated with properties sold.
The decrease in non-operating income of $2.2 million was due to the collection of loans receivable.
The decrease in interest and amortization expense of $3.5 million related primarily to the satisfaction of mortgage debt in connection with property sales and a decrease in the interest rate on our $129.1 million of trust preferred securities.
The decrease in debt satisfaction charges, net of $3.1 million was primarily due to the timing of debt satisfactions.
The increase in impairment charges of $10.6 million related primarily to impairment charges recognized on properties primarily due to vacancies and lack of leasing prospects.
The decrease in gains on sales of properties of $15.1 million related to the timing of sales of properties.
The decrease in equity in earnings (losses) of non-consolidated entities of $3.6 million was primarily due to an impairment charge recognized on our non-consolidated investment in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida where the sole tenant filed for bankruptcy.
The decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $0.9 million related primarily to a decrease in the limited partners' share of rental revenues and gains on sales of properties, which were recognized by LCIF in 2016.
Any increase in net income in future periods will be closely tied to the level of acquisitions and dispositions and leasing activity. Without acquisitions and favorable leasing activity, the sources of growth in net income are limited to index-adjusted rents (such as the consumer price index), reduced interest expense on amortizing mortgages and debt refinancings and by controlling other variable overhead costs and, periodically, gains on sales of properties. However, there are many factors beyond management's control that could offset these items including, without limitation, increased interest rates, decreased occupancy rates, tenant monetary defaults, delayed acquisitions and the other risks described in our periodic reports filed with the SEC.

41
Table of Contents


Six months ended June 30, 2017 compare with six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in net income attributable to common shareholders of $55.7 million was primarily due to the items discussed below.
The decrease in total gross revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2017 of $36.4 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in rental revenue. Rental revenue decreased $36.0 million primarily due to a $38.5 million decrease in revenue from sold properties, primarily the New York City land investments, a $10.8 million decrease in termination income and a $3.8 million decrease in revenue from certain held properties due to changes in occupancy, partially offset by 2017 and 2016 property acquisitions rental revenue of $16.8 million.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $0.8 million was primarily due to acquisitions of certain properties.
The increase in property operating expense of $1.7 million was primarily due to costs incurred on properties acquired in 2017 and 2016, costs incurred on vacant properties prior to sale and an increase in acquisition costs, offset in part by reduced operating costs associated with sold properties.
The increase in general and administrative expenses of $2.1 million related primarily to an increase in professional fees, primarily legal fees.
The decrease in non-operating income of $2.4 million was due to the collection of loans receivable.
The decrease in interest and amortization expense of $6.6 million related primarily to the satisfaction of mortgage debt in connection with property sales and a decrease in the interest rate on our $129.1 million of trust preferred securities.
The decrease in debt satisfaction charges, net of $3.3 million was primarily due to the timing of debt satisfactions.
The increase in impairment charges and loan loss of $18.6 million related primarily to impairment charges recognized on properties due to vacancies and lack of leasing prospects and a $5.3 million loan loss recognized on the sale of our Kennewick, Washington loan receivable.
The increase in gains on sales of properties of $2.1 million related to the timing of sales of properties.
The decrease in equity in earnings (losses) of non-consolidated entities of $7.4 million was primarily due to the timing of gains recognized on the sale of non-consolidated investments, partially offset by an impairment charge recognized in 2017 on our investment in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida where the sole tenant filed for bankruptcy.
The decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $1.8 million related primarily to a decrease in the limited partners' share of rental revenues and gains on sales of properties, which were recognized by LCIF in 2016.
Same-Store Results
Same-store net operating income, or NOI, which is a non-GAAP measure, represents the NOI for consolidated properties that were owned and included in our portfolio for two comparable reporting periods, excluding properties encumbered by mortgage loans in default and the revenue associated with the expansion of properties, as applicable. We define NOI as operating revenues (rental income (less GAAP rent adjustments and lease termination income), tenant reimbursements and other property income) less property operating expenses. As same-store NOI excludes the change in NOI from acquired and disposed of properties and certain other properties, it highlights operating trends such as occupancy levels, rental rates and operating costs on properties. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating same-store NOI, and accordingly same-store NOI may not be comparable to other REITs. Management believes that same-store NOI is a useful supplemental measure of the Company's operating performance. However, same-store NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of the Company's financial performance since it does not reflect the operations of the Company's entire portfolio, nor does it reflect the impact of general and administrative expenses, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, other nonproperty income and losses, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of the Company's properties, or trends in development and construction activities which are significant economic costs and activities that could materially impact the Company's results from operations. Lexington believes that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to same-store NOI.

42
Table of Contents


The following presents our consolidated same-store NOI, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 ($000's):
 
2017
 
2016
Total cash base rent
$
147,306

 
$
148,368

Tenant reimbursements
12,400

 
13,284

Property operating expenses
(19,856
)
 
(18,525
)
Same-store NOI
$
139,850

 
$
143,127

Our reported same-store NOI decreased from 2016 to 2017 by 2.3%. The decrease in same-store NOI between periods primarily related to an increase in vacancy in certain of our office properties. Our historical same-store square footage leased was 97.8% at June 30, 2017 and 98.9% at June 30, 2016.
Below is a reconciliation of net income to same-store NOI for periods presented ($000's):
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
Net income
$
49,585

 
$
107,133

 
 
 
 
Interest and amortization expense
38,941

 
45,572

Provision for income taxes
799

 
637

Depreciation and amortization
85,211

 
84,399

General and administrative
17,598

 
15,522

Transaction costs
488

 
214

Non-operating income
(3,992
)
 
(6,420
)
Gains on sales of properties
(44,433
)
 
(42,341
)
Impairment charges and loan loss
21,591

 
3,014

Debt satisfaction charges, net
46

 
3,356

Equity in (earnings) losses of non-consolidated entities
1,347

 
(6,054
)
Lease termination income
(2,625
)
 
(13,382
)
Straight-line adjustments
(8,550
)
 
(24,380
)
Lease incentives
941

 
842

Amortization of above/below market leases
860

 
955

NOI
157,807

 
169,067

 
 
 
 
Less NOI:
 
 
 
Disposed of properties
(1,063
)
 
(23,103
)
Acquired properties
(15,464
)
 
(1,088
)
Properties in default
(1,430
)
 
(1,749
)
Same-Store NOI
$
139,850

 
$
143,127


43
Table of Contents


Funds From Operations
We believe that Funds from Operations, or FFO, which is a non-GAAP measure, is a widely recognized and appropriate measure of the performance of an equity REIT. We believe FFO is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. As a result, FFO provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities, interest costs and other matters without the inclusion of depreciation and amortization, providing perspective that may not necessarily be apparent from net income.
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, defines FFO as “net income (or loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for non-consolidated partnerships and joint ventures.” NAREIT clarified its computation of FFO to exclude impairment charges on depreciable real estate owned directly or indirectly. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.
We present FFO available to common shareholders and unitholders - basic and also present FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders - diluted on a company-wide basis as if all securities that are convertible, at the holder's option, into our common shares, are converted at the beginning of the period. We also present Adjusted Company FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders - diluted which adjusts FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders - diluted for certain items which we believe are not indicative of the operating results of our real estate portfolio. We believe this is an appropriate presentation as it is frequently requested by security analysts, investors and other interested parties. Since others do not calculate these measures in a similar fashion, these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures as reported by others. These measures should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.

44
Table of Contents


The following presents a reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders to FFO available to common shareholders and unitholders and Adjusted Company FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited and dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
 
 
 
Three Months ended June 30,
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common shareholders
 
$
5,519

 
$
53,875

 
$
45,916

 
$
101,655

Adjustments:
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
41,076

 
39,688

 
82,618

 
80,881

 
Impairment charges - real estate, including non-consolidated entities
 
17,111

 
3,014

 
19,809

 
3,014

 
Noncontrolling interests - OP units
 
—

 
927

 
(19
)
 
1,662

 
Amortization of leasing commissions
 
1,244

 
1,584

 
2,593

 
3,518

 
Joint venture and noncontrolling interest adjustment
 
265

 
222

 
605

 
458

 
Gains on sales of properties, including non-consolidated entities
 
(10,240
)
 
(25,326
)
 
(45,885
)
 
(47,719
)
 
Tax on sales of properties
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
50

FFO available to common shareholders and unitholders - basic
 
54,975

 
73,984

 
105,637

 
143,519

 
Preferred dividends
 
1,573

 
1,573

 
3,145

 
3,145

 
Interest and amortization on 6.00% Convertible Guaranteed Notes
 
—

 
233

 
—

 
485

 
Amount allocated to participating securities
 
60

 
84

 
131

 
175

FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders - diluted
 
56,608

 
75,874

 
108,913

 
147,324

 
Debt satisfaction charges, net
 
46

 
3,194

 
46

 
3,356

 
Loan loss
 
—

 
—

 
5,294

 
—

 
Transaction costs
 
302

 
68

 
488

 
214

Adjusted Company FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders - diluted
 
$
56,956

 
$
79,136

 
$
114,741

 
$
150,894

Per Common Share and Unit Amounts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FFO
 
$
0.23

 
$
0.31

 
$
0.44

 
$
0.61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FFO
 
$
0.23

 
$
0.31

 
$
0.44

 
$
0.60

Adjusted Company FFO
 
$
0.23

 
$
0.32

 
$
0.47

 
$
0.62

 
 
 
Three Months ended June 30,
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Weighted-Average Common Shares:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic EPS
 
237,720,198

 
232,592,998

 
237,451,355

 
232,617,901

Operating partnership units(1)
 
3,724,462

 
3,818,805

 
3,747,922

 
3,819,498

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic FFO
 
241,444,660

 
236,411,803

 
241,199,277

 
236,437,399

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted EPS
 
241,531,313

 
235,227,199

 
241,310,529

 
235,151,256

Operating partnership units(1)
 
—

 
3,818,805

 
—

 
3,819,498

Unvested share-based payment awards
 
606,934

 
—

 
648,810

 
—

Preferred shares - Series C
 
4,710,570

 
4,710,570

 
4,710,570

 
4,710,570

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted FFO
 
246,848,817

 
243,756,574

 
246,669,909

 
243,681,324

(1) Includes all OP units other than OP units held by us.

45
Table of Contents


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2017, we had investments in various real estate entities with varying structures. The real estate investments owned by these entities are generally financed with non-recourse debt. Non-recourse debt is generally defined as debt whereby the lenders' sole recourse with respect to borrower defaults is limited to the value of the assets collateralized by the debt. The lender generally does not have recourse against any other assets owned by the borrower or any of the members or partners of the borrower, except for certain specified exceptions listed in the particular loan documents. These exceptions generally relate to "bad boy" acts, including fraud and breaches of material representations. We have guaranteed such obligations for certain of our non-consolidated entities.

46
Table of Contents


Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.:
Critical Accounting Policies
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon the Partnership's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. In preparing the Partnership's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Partnership makes assumptions, judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The Partnership bases its assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that the Partnership believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On a regular basis, the Partnership evaluates its assumptions, judgments and estimates. Certain of the Partnership's accounting policies are discussed under (1) Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report, (2) note 2 to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report and (3) note 1 to the Partnership's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report. The Partnership believes there have been no material changes to the items that the Partnership disclosed as the Partnership's critical accounting policies under Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report. 
Liquidity 
Cash Flows. The Partnership believes that its cash flows from operations will continue to provide adequate capital to fund its operating and administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations, working capital needs and all distribution payments in accordance with partnership agreement requirements in both the short-term and long-term. However, without a capital event, which would most likely involve the Company, the Partnership does not have the ability to fund balloon payments on maturing mortgages or acquire new investments. 
Cash flows from operations totaled $21.2 million and $25.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the impact of property sales and a decrease in lease terminations, partially offset by a decrease in the allocation of interest and general and administrative expenses from Lexington. The underlying drivers that impact working capital and therefore cash flows from operations are the timing of (1) the collection of rents and tenant reimbursements, (2) the payment of interest on mortgage debt and (3) operating and general and administrative costs. The Partnership believes the net-lease structure of the leases encumbering a majority of the properties in which the Partnership has an interest mitigates the risks of the timing of cash flows from operations since the payment and timing of operating costs related to the properties are generally borne directly by the tenant. Collection and timing of tenant rents is closely monitored by management as part of the Partnership cash management program.
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities totaled $(43.1) million and $52.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash provided by investing activities related primarily to proceeds from the sale of properties and distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings. Cash used in investing activities related primarily to capital expenditures on real estate properties, acquisition of real estate, investments in real estate under construction, investments in non-consolidated entities and an increase in restricted cash.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $5.7 million and $73.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to distribution payments, an increase in deferred financing costs and debt payments. Cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to related party advances (payments), net.
Property Specific Debt. As of June 30, 2017, the Partnership had no property specific debt maturing in 2017 and 2018. However, if a mortgage loan is unable to be refinanced upon maturity, the Partnership will be dependent on the Company's liquidity resources to satisfy such mortgage loan to avoid transferring the underlying property to the lender or selling the underlying property to a third party. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Partnership satisfied a $15.0 million balloon maturity on its Byhalia Mississippi property.
 Capital Recycling. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Partnership disposed of its interests in certain investments for an aggregate gross sales price of $7.6 million and $103.3 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Partnership satisfied an aggregate $38.1 million of non-recourse mortgage debt in connection with the sales.

47
Table of Contents


Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 2017 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in total gross revenues of $20.1 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in rental revenue. The decrease in rental revenue of $19.9 million was primarily due to a reduction in rental revenue of $22.1 million due to a decrease in revenue from properties sold and a reduction in lease termination income, partially offset by rental revenue from newly acquired properties of $2.0 million.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $1.0 million was primarily due to acquisitions of certain properties.
The decrease in general and administrative expense of $0.5 million primarily related to a decrease in the allocation of expenses from Lexington.
The decrease in interest and amortization expense of $4.5 million was primarily due to the sale of encumbered properties in 2016, particularly the New York, New York land investments, and a decrease in the allocation of interest and amortization expense from Lexington.
The decrease in debt satisfaction charges, net of $1.6 million was primarily due to the timing of debt satisfactions.
Impairment charges of $2.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily related to an impairment charge recognized on the sale of a vacant office property in Southfield, Michigan.
The decrease in gains on sales of properties of $8.2 million related to the timing of sales of properties.
Six months ended June 30, 2017 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in total gross revenues of $34.9 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in rental revenue. The decrease in rental revenue of $34.2 million was primarily due to a reduction in rental revenue of $36.9 million due to a decrease in revenue from properties sold and a reduction in lease termination income, partially offset by rental revenue from newly acquired properties of $2.9 million.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $0.8 million was primarily due to acquisitions of certain properties.
Property operating expense decreased $1.1 million primarily due to the sale of properties, including multi-tenanted properties, where LCIF had operating expense responsibilities.
The decrease in general and administrative expense of $1.2 million primarily related to a decrease in the allocation of expenses from Lexington.
The decrease in interest and amortization expense of $9.4 million was primarily due to the sale of encumbered properties in 2016, particularly the New York, New York land investments, and a decrease in the allocation of interest and amortization expense from Lexington.
The decrease in debt satisfaction charges, net of $1.6 million was primarily due to the timing of debt satisfactions.
Impairment charges of $5.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, related to impairment charges recognized on the sale of two vacant office properties in Foxborough, Massachusetts and Southfield, Michigan.
The decrease in gains on sales of properties of $16.0 million related to the timing of sales of properties.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Partnership is a co-borrower or guarantor of corporate borrowing facilities and debt securities of the Company (see notes 5 and 8 to the Partnership's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to debt securities). In addition, the Partnership, from time to time, guarantees certain tenant improvement allowances and lease commissions on behalf of its subsidiaries when required by the related tenant or lender. However, the Partnership does not believe these guarantees are material to it as the obligations under and risks associated with such guarantees are priced into the rent under the applicable lease or the value of the applicable property.

48
Table of Contents


ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market risk relates primarily to our variable-rate indebtedness not subject to interest rate swaps and our fixed-rate debt. Our consolidated aggregate principal variable-rate indebtedness was $129.1 million and $123.0 million at June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which represented 7.0% and 5.8% of our aggregate principal consolidated indebtedness. During the three-month period ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, our variable-rate indebtedness had a weighted-average interest rate of 2.9% and 1.4%, respectively. Had the weighted-average interest rate been 100 basis points higher, our interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 would have increased by $219 thousand and $366 thousand, respectively. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, our variable-rate indebtedness had a weighted-average interest rate of 2.9% and 1.4%, respectively. Had the weighted-average interest rate been 100 basis points higher, our interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 would have increased by $219 thousand and $837 thousand, respectively. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, our aggregate principal consolidated fixed-rate debt was $1.7 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, which represented 93.0% and 94.2%, respectively, of our aggregate principal indebtedness.

For certain of our financial instruments, fair values are not readily available since there are no active trading markets as characterized by current exchanges between willing parties. Accordingly, we derive or estimate fair values using various valuation techniques, such as computing the present value of estimated future cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. However, the determination of estimated cash flows may be subjective and imprecise. Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. The following fair value was determined using the interest rates that we believe our outstanding fixed-rate indebtedness would warrant as of June 30, 2017. We believe the fair value is indicative of the interest rate environment as of June 30, 2017, but this amount does not take into consideration the effects of subsequent interest rate fluctuations. Accordingly, we estimate that the fair value of our fixed-rate indebtedness was $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2017.

Our interest rate risk objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we manage our exposure to fluctuations in market interest rates through the use of fixed-rate debt instruments to the extent that reasonably favorable rates are obtainable with such arrangements. We may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps or caps to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument or to effectively lock the interest rate on a portion of our variable-rate debt. As of June 30, 2017, we had 10 interest rate swap agreements (see note 9 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report).

The Partnership has similar exposure to market risk and interest rate risk relating to its variable-rate indebtedness because the Partnership is a co-borrower of the Company's variable-rate debt.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Lexington Realty Trust:

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report to determine if such controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As discussed in the Annual Report, Management has identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, and management, including each of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2017 due to this material weakness. Management believes the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position as of the specified dates and our results of operations and cash flows for the specified periods.


49
Table of Contents


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, management began implementing a remediation plan that was approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Trustees with respect to the material weakness described in the Annual Report. Management took the following steps as part of the remediation:
•
Evaluated and revised our financial reporting process to align our control environment, business processes and monitoring and personnel with our financial reporting objectives, with an emphasis on critical accounting policies and significant or unusual transactions.
•
Improved the documentation of our system of internal control over financial reporting, specifically the application of critical accounting policies and identification of significant or unusual transactions, by establishing a policy guidance for the identification and critical accounting analysis of significant or unusual transactions.
•
Implemented additional controls over the communication, review and authorization of significant or unusual transactions, including, appropriate oversight by our Board of Trustees and Audit Committee of our Board of Trustees, as applicable.

The changes resulting from this remediation plan have not been tested.  Until testing occurs and the changes operate for an appropriate period of time to insure their effectiveness, the material weakness described in the Annual Report will not be considered remediated.  Other than these changes, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations,  there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.:

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership’s management, with the participation of Lex GP’s President and Lex GP’s Vice President and Treasurer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report to determine if such controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Partnership’s management, including Lex GP’s President and Lex GP’s Vice President and Treasurer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As discussed in the Annual Report, Management has identified a material weakness in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting, and management, including each of Lex GP's President and Lex GP's Vice President and Treasurer, has concluded that the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2017 due to this material weakness. Management believes the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein present fairly, in all material respects, the Partnership's financial position as of the specified dates and the Partnership's results of operations and cash flows for the specified periods.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership’s management began implementing a remediation plan that was approved by the Audit Committee of Lexington’s Board of Trustees with respect to the material weakness described in the Annual Report. The Partnership’s management took the following steps as part of the remediation:
•
Evaluated and revised the Partnership’s financial reporting process to align the Partnership’s control environment, business processes and monitoring and personnel with the Partnership’s financial reporting objectives, with an emphasis on critical accounting policies and significant or unusual transactions.
•
Improved the documentation of the Partnership’s system of internal control over financial reporting, specifically the application of critical accounting policies and identification of significant or unusual transactions, by establishing a policy guidance for the identification and critical accounting analysis of significant or unusual transactions.
•
Implemented additional controls over the communication, review and authorization of significant or unusual transactions, including, appropriate oversight by Lexington’s Board of Trustees and Audit Committee of Lexington’s Board of Trustees, as applicable.  

50
Table of Contents



The changes resulting from this remediation plan have not been tested.  Until testing occurs and the changes operate for an appropriate period of time to insure their effectiveness, the material weakness described in the Annual Report will not be considered remediated.  Other than these changes, there were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations,  there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.




51
Table of Contents


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
Legal Proceedings.
From time to time the Company and Partnership are directly and indirectly involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of the Company's and Partnership's business, including claims by lenders under non-recourse carve-out guarantees. We believe, based on currently available information, and after consultation with legal counsel, that although the outcomes of those normal course proceedings are uncertain, the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's or the Partnership's business, financial condition and results of operations.
GSMSC II 2006-GG6 Bridgewater Hills Corporate Center, LLC v. Lexington Realty Trust (Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York-Index No. 653117/2015)
On September 16, 2015, GSMSC II 2006-GG6 Bridgewater Hills Corporate Center, LLC commenced an action as lender against the Company based on a limited guaranty of recourse obligations executed by a predecessor entity of the Company in connection with a mortgage loan secured by a property owner subsidiary's commercial property in Bridgewater, New Jersey.  The property owner subsidiary defaulted due to non-payment after the sole tenant vacated at the end of the lease term.  The lender seeks approximately $9.2 million in order to satisfy the outstanding amount of the loan, plus interest, reasonable attorney’s fees and other costs and disbursements related thereto. The Company has not recorded any liability relating to this litigation as the Company believes that a loss contingency is “reasonably possible” (as defined by FASB ASC 450-20-20) but not “probable” (as defined by FASB ASC 450-20-20).
The lender claims that the Company's limited guaranty was triggered due to the merger of Newkirk Realty Trust, Inc. and Lexington Corporate Properties Trust on December 31, 2006, arguing that it constituted an event of default because it was a transfer that was not permitted by the loan agreement. The limited guaranty provides that the guarantor's liability for the guaranteed obligations shall not exceed $10.0 million, which the Company believes is its maximum exposure to loss. We intend to vigorously defend the lender’s claim.  The Company filed a motion to dismiss, which was generally denied. The parties are presently in the discovery phase, with document productions ongoing and with fact and expert depositions currently expected to be conducted and completed later this year.
The lender also brought a foreclosure action against the property owner subsidiary. A foreclosure sale was held September 13, 2016 and the lender acquired the property for a nominal amount.
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes in our or the Partnership's risk factors from those disclosed in the Annual Report.
ITEM 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The following table summarizes repurchases of our common shares/OP units during the three months ended June 30, 2017 pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plans(1):
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
 
(a)
Total Number of Shares/Units Purchased
 
(b)
Average Price Paid Per Share/ Unit
 
(c)
Total Number of Shares/Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)
 
(d)
Maximum Number of Shares/Units That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1)
April 1 - 30, 2017
 
—

 
$
—

 
—

 
6,599,088

May 1 - 31, 2017
 
—

 
$
—

 
—

 
6,599,088

June 1 - 30, 2017
 
—

 
$
—

 
—

 
6,599,088

Second quarter 2017
 
—

 
$
—

 
—

 
6,599,088

(1)
Share repurchase authorization announced on July 2, 2015, which has no expiration date.

ITEM 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities - not applicable.
ITEM 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures - not applicable.
ITEM 5.
Other Information - not applicable.

52
Table of Contents


ITEM 6.
Exhibits.

Exhibit No.
 
 
 
Description
 
 
 
 
 
3.1
 
—
 
Articles of Merger and Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Company, dated December 31, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 8, 2007 (the “01/08/07 8-K”))(1)
3.2
 
—
 
Articles Supplementary Relating to the Reclassification of 8.05% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 7.55% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 21, 2013)(1)
3.3
 
—
 
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the 01/08/07 8-K)(1)
3.4
 
—
 
First Amendment to Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009)(1)
3.5
 
__
 
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2017) (1)
3.6
 
—
 
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 23, 2013, by and among Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P. (“LCIF”) and Lepercq Corporate Income Fund II L.P. (“LCIF II”) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 24, 2013)(1)
3.7
 
—
 
Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of LCIF, dated as of December 30, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 3.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2014)(1)
4.1
 
—
 
Specimen of Common Shares Certificate of the Company (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006)(1)
4.2
 
—
 
Form of 6.50% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8A filed December 8, 2004)(1)
4.3
 
—
 
Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2007, among the Company (as successor by merger), the other guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 29, 2007 (the “01/29/07 8-K”))(1)
4.4
 
—
 
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated March 21, 2007, among the Company, The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association, The Bank of New York (Delaware), the Administrative Trustees (as named therein) and the several holders of the Preferred Securities from time to time (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 27, 2007 (the “03/27/2007 8-K”))(1)
4.5
 
—
 
Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2007, between Lexington Realty Trust and The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the 03/27/07 8-K)(1)
4.6
 
—
 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 31, 2008, among the Company, the other guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009)(1)
4.7
 
—
 
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 9, 2009, among the Company (as successor to the MLP), the other guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 15, 2009)(1)
4.8
 
—
 
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 26, 2010 among the Company, the guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, including the Form of 6.00% Convertible Guaranteed Notes due 2030 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 26, 2010)(1)
4.9
 
—
 
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2012, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company signatories thereto, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2012)(1)
4.10
 
—
 
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2013, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company signatories thereto, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 13, 2013 (the “02/13/13 8-K”))(1)
4.11
 
—
 
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 6, 2013, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company signatories thereto, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2013)(1)
4.12
 
—
 
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 13, 2013, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company signatories thereto, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2013 (“06/13/13 8-K”))(1)

53
Table of Contents


4.13
 
—
 
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2013, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company signatories thereto, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2013)(1)
4.14
 
—
 
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2013, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the 06/13/2013 8-K))(1)
4.15
 
—
 
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 13, 2013, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the 06/13/2013 8-K)(1)
4.16
 
—
 
Indenture dated as of May 9, 2014, among the Company, LCIF and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 13, 2014)(1)
4.17
 
—
 
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 20, 2014, among the Company, LCIF and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2014)(1)
10.1
 
—
 
Lexington Realty Trust Amended and Restated 2011 Equity-Based Award Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2017)(1, 4)
31.1
 
—
 
Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(2)
31.2
 
—
 
Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(2)
31.3
 
—
 
Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(2)
31.4
 
—
 
Certification pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(2)
32.1
 
—
 
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(3)
32.2
 
—
 
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(3)
32.3
 
—
 
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(3)
32.4
 
—
 
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(3)
101.INS
 
—
 
XBRL Instance Document (2, 5)
101.SCH
 
—
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema (2, 5)
101.CAL
 
—
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase (2, 5)
101.DEF
 
—
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (2, 5)
101.LAB
 
—
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (2, 5)
101.PRE
 
—
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (2, 5)
(1)
Incorporated by reference.
(2)
Filed herewith.
(3)
Furnished herewith. This exhibit shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or Section 18 of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections, and shall not be part of any registration statement to which it may relate, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.
(4)
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(5)
The following materials from this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017 are formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company; (ii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations of the Company; (iii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) of the Company; (iv) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity of the Company; (v) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the Company; (vi) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, detailed tagged; (vii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of LCIF; (viii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations of LCIF; (ix) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital of LCIF; (x) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of LCIF; and (xi) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of LCIF, detailed tagged.

54
Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the undersigned registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
Lexington Realty Trust
 
 
 
 
Date:
August 8, 2017
By:
/s/ T. Wilson Eglin
 
 
 
T. Wilson Eglin
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer)
 
 
 
 
Date:
August 8, 2017
By:
/s/ Patrick Carroll
 
 
 
Patrick Carroll
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
and Treasurer
(principal financial officer)

 
 
Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P.
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
Lex GP-1 Trust, its General Partner
 
 
 
 
Date:
August 8, 2017
By:
/s/ T. Wilson Eglin
 
 
 
T. Wilson Eglin
 
 
 
President
(principal executive officer)
 
 
 
 
Date:
August 8, 2017
By:
/s/ Patrick Carroll
 
 
 
Patrick Carroll
 
 
 
Vice President and Treasurer
(principal financial officer)




55