-
Annual Statements
-
»
Companies
-
»
MACERICH CO
-
»
Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
MACERICH CO - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
Commission File No. 1-12504
THE MACERICH COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
MARYLAND |
|
95-4448705 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700, Santa Monica, California 90401 (Address of principal executive office, including zip code) |
(310) 394-6000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety
(90) days.
YES
ý NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files).
YES
ý NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer ý |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
o NO ý
Number of shares outstanding as of August 3, 2011 of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.01 per share: 131,916,463 shares
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, net |
|
$ |
5,619,750 |
|
$ |
5,674,127 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
73,229 |
|
|
445,645 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
82,455 |
|
|
71,434 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
25,394 |
|
|
25,935 |
|
Tenant and other receivables, net |
|
|
86,559 |
|
|
95,083 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
|
|
348,208 |
|
|
316,969 |
|
Loans to unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
3,459 |
|
|
3,095 |
|
Due from affiliates |
|
|
5,269 |
|
|
6,599 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
1,205,457 |
|
|
1,006,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,449,780 |
|
$ |
7,645,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
$ |
276,709 |
|
$ |
302,344 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
2,820,109 |
|
|
2,957,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,096,818 |
|
|
3,259,475 |
|
Bank and other notes payable |
|
|
782,420 |
|
|
632,595 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
69,808 |
|
|
70,585 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
247,243 |
|
|
257,678 |
|
Distributions in excess of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
72,497 |
|
|
65,045 |
|
Co-venture obligation |
|
|
128,869 |
|
|
160,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,397,655 |
|
|
4,445,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
|
11,366 |
|
|
11,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 132,074,432 and 130,452,032 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
3,480,284 |
|
|
3,456,569 |
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(715,510 |
) |
|
(564,357 |
) |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
(3,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity |
|
|
2,769,045 |
|
|
2,890,279 |
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
271,714 |
|
|
297,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
3,040,759 |
|
|
3,187,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity |
|
$ |
7,449,780 |
|
$ |
7,645,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
June 30, |
|
For the Six Months
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
110,587 |
|
$ |
102,002 |
|
$ |
219,282 |
|
$ |
203,472 |
|
|
Percentage rents |
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
6,095 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
60,932 |
|
|
57,112 |
|
|
122,413 |
|
|
117,984 |
|
|
Management Companies |
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
12,117 |
|
|
18,702 |
|
|
22,339 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
8,162 |
|
|
6,887 |
|
|
14,501 |
|
|
12,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
190,940 |
|
|
181,226 |
|
|
380,992 |
|
|
362,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping center and operating expenses |
|
|
64,080 |
|
|
56,296 |
|
|
126,416 |
|
|
116,784 |
|
|
Management Companies' operating expenses |
|
|
20,921 |
|
|
24,466 |
|
|
46,777 |
|
|
46,653 |
|
|
REIT general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
3,642 |
|
|
11,386 |
|
|
11,160 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
65,462 |
|
|
59,365 |
|
|
129,534 |
|
|
118,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,205 |
|
|
143,769 |
|
|
314,113 |
|
|
292,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
3,103 |
|
|
8,575 |
|
|
6,205 |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
44,946 |
|
|
49,135 |
|
|
92,454 |
|
|
101,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,032 |
|
|
52,238 |
|
|
101,029 |
|
|
107,649 |
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
32 |
|
|
489 |
|
|
9,133 |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
203,269 |
|
|
196,496 |
|
|
424,275 |
|
|
400,782 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
25,207 |
|
|
15,762 |
|
|
55,482 |
|
|
32,221 |
|
Co-venture expense |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
(1,993 |
) |
|
(2,498 |
) |
|
(3,377 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
2,590 |
|
(Loss) gain on remeasurement, sale or write down of assets, net |
|
|
(34,442 |
) |
|
582 |
|
|
(32,641 |
) |
|
582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(20,998 |
) |
|
456 |
|
|
(18,694 |
) |
|
(6,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale or write down of assets, net |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
(72 |
) |
|
(2,262 |
) |
|
(71 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
111 |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
136 |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
87 |
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
(2,126 |
) |
|
(723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(20,911 |
) |
|
55 |
|
|
(20,820 |
) |
|
(6,806 |
) |
Less net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
|
495 |
|
|
(1,638 |
) |
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(19,216 |
) |
$ |
(440 |
) |
$ |
(19,182 |
) |
$ |
(6,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share attributable to Companybasic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share attributable to Companydiluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
131,691,000 |
|
|
123,446,000 |
|
|
131,136,000 |
|
|
110,271,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
131,691,000 |
|
|
123,446,000 |
|
|
131,136,000 |
|
|
110,271,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY AND
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Par
Value |
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital |
|
Accumulated
Deficit |
|
Total
Stockholders'
Equity |
|
Noncontrolling
Interests |
|
Total
Equity |
|
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests |
|
Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
|
130,452,032 |
|
$ |
1,304 |
|
$ |
3,456,569 |
|
$ |
(564,357 |
) |
$ |
(3,237 |
) |
$ |
2,890,279 |
|
$ |
297,717 |
|
$ |
3,187,996 |
|
$ |
11,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(19,182 |
) |
|
(1,780 |
) |
|
(20,962 |
) |
|
142 |
|
|
Interest rate swap/cap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,182 |
) |
|
6,188 |
|
|
(12,994 |
) |
|
(1,780 |
) |
|
(14,774 |
) |
|
142 |
|
Amortization of share and unit-based plans |
|
|
584,874 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
11,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
11,586 |
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchases |
|
|
7,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid ($1.00) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(131,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(131,971 |
) |
|
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,289 |
) |
|
(13,289 |
) |
|
(142 |
) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
Conversion of noncontrolling interests to common shares |
|
|
1,030,121 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
20,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,231 |
|
|
(20,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,233 |
) |
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
|
132,074,432 |
|
$ |
1,320 |
|
$ |
3,480,284 |
|
$ |
(715,510 |
) |
$ |
2,951 |
|
$ |
2,769,045 |
|
$ |
271,714 |
|
$ |
3,040,759 |
|
$ |
11,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(20,820 |
) |
$ |
(6,806 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
133 |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on remeasurement, sale or write down of assets, net |
|
|
32,641 |
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
Loss on sale or write down of assets, net from discontinued operations |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
137,352 |
|
|
125,268 |
|
|
|
Amortization of net discount on mortgages, bank and other notes payable |
|
|
4,573 |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
Amortization of share and unit-based plans |
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(4,246 |
) |
|
(2,590 |
) |
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(55,482 |
) |
|
(32,221 |
) |
|
|
Co-venture expense |
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
Distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
4,519 |
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant and other receivables |
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
22,605 |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
(5,869 |
) |
|
(14,208 |
) |
|
|
|
Due from affiliates |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(3,553 |
) |
|
(19,788 |
) |
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(19,891 |
) |
|
(17,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
89,860 |
|
|
72,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of property, development, redevelopment and property improvements |
|
|
(91,268 |
) |
|
(66,377 |
) |
|
Proceeds from note receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
11,763 |
|
|
Maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
672 |
|
|
654 |
|
|
Deferred leasing costs |
|
|
(18,794 |
) |
|
(18,205 |
) |
|
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
60,746 |
|
|
60,549 |
|
|
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(142,106 |
) |
|
(8,123 |
) |
|
Loans to unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
(3,176 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
(11,021 |
) |
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(197,260 |
) |
|
(23,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mortgages, bank and other notes payable |
|
|
272,000 |
|
|
350,140 |
|
|
Payments on mortgages, bank and other notes payable |
|
|
(341,036 |
) |
|
(985,993 |
) |
|
Repurchase of convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
(18,191 |
) |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(16,999 |
) |
|
(6,260 |
) |
|
Proceeds from share and unit-based plans |
|
|
320 |
|
|
376 |
|
|
Net proceeds from stock offering |
|
|
|
|
|
1,220,880 |
|
|
Redemption of stock warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
(17,639 |
) |
|
Dividends and distributions |
|
|
(145,402 |
) |
|
(81,881 |
) |
|
Distributions to co-venture partner |
|
|
(33,899 |
) |
|
(6,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(265,016 |
) |
|
454,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(372,416 |
) |
|
503,463 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
445,645 |
|
|
93,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
73,229 |
|
$ |
596,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
84,977 |
|
$ |
106,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued development costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
14,645 |
|
$ |
32,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of properties by assumption of mortgage note payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
56,900 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition of property in exchange for investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
$ |
56,952 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock dividend |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
43,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Operating Partnership units to common stock |
|
$ |
20,231 |
|
$ |
4,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. Organization:
The Macerich Company (the "Company") is involved in the acquisition, ownership, development, redevelopment, management and leasing of regional and community shopping centers (the
"Centers") located throughout the United States.
The
Company commenced operations effective with the completion of its initial public offering on March 16, 1994. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was the sole general
partner of and held a 92% ownership interest in The Macerich Partnership, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership"). The Company was organized to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT")
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The
property management, leasing and redevelopment of the Company's portfolio is provided by the Company's management companies, Macerich Property Management Company, LLC, a
single member Delaware limited liability company, Macerich Management Company, a California corporation, Macerich Arizona Partners LLC, a single member Arizona limited liability company, Macerich
Arizona Management LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company, Macerich Partners of Colorado, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, MACW Mall Management, Inc., a
New York corporation, and MACW Property Management, LLC, a single member New York limited liability company. All seven of the management companies are collectively referred to herein as the
"Management Companies."
All
references to the Company in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include the Company, those entities owned or controlled by the Company and predecessors of the
Company, unless the context indicates otherwise.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles ("GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. They do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and have not been audited by independent public accountants.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Operating Partnership. Investments in entities in which the Company retains a controlling
financial interest or entities that meet the definition of a variable interest entity in which the Company has, as a result of ownership, contractual or other financial interests, both the power to
direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the variable interest entity and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be
significant to the variable interest entity are consolidated; otherwise they are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and are reflected as "investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures." The Company has identified Shoppingtown Mall, L.P. and Camelback Shopping Center Limited Partnership as variable interest entities that meet the criteria for consolidation.
These variable interest entities included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations had aggregate revenue of $2,604 and $2,673 for
7
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4,768 and $6,331 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The aggregate expenses of these variable
interest entities were $39,624 and $4,187 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $43,143 and $7,699 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Included in the aggregate expenses for these variable interest entities is an impairment charge of $35,729 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to
write-down the long-lived assets of Shoppingtown Mall (See Note 6Property). The significant assets and liabilities of these variable interest entities
consisted of property of $43,043 and $81,155 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and mortgage notes payable of $38,968 and $39,675 at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively.
All
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
The
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements for the interim periods have been made. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.
8
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
3. Earnings per Share ("EPS"):
The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator used in the computation of earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010 (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, |
|
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(20,998 |
) |
$ |
456 |
|
$ |
(18,694 |
) |
$ |
(6,083 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
87 |
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
(2,126 |
) |
|
(723 |
) |
Loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
1,638 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Company |
|
|
(19,216 |
) |
|
(440 |
) |
|
(19,182 |
) |
|
(6,797 |
) |
Allocation of earnings to participating securities |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
(534 |
) |
|
(831 |
) |
|
(1,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per sharenet loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(19,505 |
) |
$ |
(974 |
) |
$ |
(20,013 |
) |
$ |
(8,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per shareweighted average number of common shares outstanding(1) |
|
|
131,691 |
|
|
123,446 |
|
|
131,136 |
|
|
110,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common sharebasic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common sharediluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- The
Senior Notes (See Note 11Bank and Other Notes Payable) are excluded from diluted EPS for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, as their effect was antidilutive.
Diluted
EPS excludes 208,640 convertible non-participating preferred units for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, as their impact was antidilutive.
Diluted
EPS excludes 1,125,172 of unexercised stock appreciation rights ("SARs") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 1,150,172 of unexercised SARs for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, as their effect was antidilutive.
9
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
3. Earnings per Share ("EPS"): (Continued)
Diluted
EPS excludes 122,500 of unexercised stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 127,500 of unexercised stock options for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, as their effect was antidilutive.
Diluted
EPS excludes 935,358 of unexercised stock warrants for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, as their effect was antidilutive.
Diluted
EPS excludes 11,448,084 and 12,049,003 partnership units for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 11,674,114 and 12,107,671 for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as their effect was antidilutive.
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
The Company has recently made the following investments in unconsolidated joint ventures:
On
February 24, 2011, the Company's joint venture in Kierland Commons, a 434,690 square foot community center in Scottsdale, Arizona, acquired the ownership interest of another
partner in the joint venture for $105,550. The Company's share of the purchase price consisted of a cash payment of $34,161 and the assumption of a pro rata share of debt of $18,613. As a result of
the acquisition, the Company's ownership interest in Kierland Commons increased from 24.5% to 50.0%. The joint venture recognized a remeasurement gain of $25,019 on the acquisition based on the
difference of the fair value received and its previously held investment in Kierland Commons. The Company's pro rata share of the gain recognized was $12,510.
On
February 28, 2011, the Company in a 50/50 joint venture, acquired The Shops at Atlas Park, a 400,000 square foot community center in Queens, New York for a total purchase price
of $53,750. The Company's share of the purchase price was $26,875. The results of The Shops at Atlas Park are included below for the period subsequent to the acquisition.
On
February 28, 2011, the Company acquired the additional 50% ownership interest in Desert Sky Mall, an 893,561 square foot regional shopping center in Phoenix, Arizona, that it
did not own for $27,625. The purchase price was funded by a cash payment of $1,875 and the assumption of the third party's pro rata share of the mortgage note payable on the property of $25,750.
Concurrent with the purchase of the partnership interest, the Company paid off the $51,500 loan on the property. Prior to the acquisition, the Company had accounted for its investment in Desert Sky
Mall under the equity method. Since the date of acquisition, the Company has included Desert Sky Mall in its consolidated financial statements (See Note 15Acquisitions).
On
April 1, 2011, the Company's joint venture in SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. conveyed Granite Run Mall to the mortgage note lender with a
deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The mortgage note was non-recourse. The Company's pro rata share of gain on the early extinguishment of debt was $7,753.
On
June 3, 2011, the Company entered into a transaction with General Growth Properties, Inc. ("General Growth"), whereby the Company acquired an additional 33.3% ownership
interest in Arrowhead Towne Center, a 1,196,941 square foot regional shopping center in Glendale, Arizona; an additional 33.3% ownership interest in Superstition Springs Center, a 1,204,803 square
foot regional
10
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
shopping
center in Mesa, Arizona; and an additional 50% ownership interest in the land under Superstition Springs Center ("Superstition Springs Land") that it did not own in exchange for six anchor
locations, including five former Mervyn's stores (See Note 16Discontinued Operations) and a cash payment of $75,000. As a result of this transaction, the Company now owns a 66.7%
ownership interest in Arrowhead Towne Center, a 66.7% ownership interest in Superstition Springs Center and a 100% ownership interest in Superstition Springs Land. Although the Company had a 66.7%
ownership interest in Arrowhead Towne Center and Superstition Springs Center upon completion of the transaction, the Company does not have a controlling financial interest in these joint ventures due
to the substantive participation rights of the outside partner and, therefore, continues to account for its investments in these joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, no
remeasurement gain was recorded on the increase in ownership. The Company has consolidated its investment in Superstition Springs Land since the date of acquisition (See
Note 15Acquisitions) and has recorded a remeasurement gain of $1,734 (See Note 6Property) as a result of the increase in ownership. This transaction is referred
herein as the "GGP Exchange".
Combined
and condensed balance sheets and statements of operations are presented below for all unconsolidated joint ventures.
11
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
Combined and Condensed Balance Sheets of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and Other Related Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
Assets(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties, net |
|
$ |
5,041,605 |
|
$ |
5,047,022 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
470,073 |
|
|
470,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,511,678 |
|
$ |
5,517,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and partners' capital(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable(2) |
|
$ |
4,433,201 |
|
$ |
4,617,127 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
193,028 |
|
|
211,942 |
|
|
Company's capital |
|
|
430,941 |
|
|
349,175 |
|
|
Outside partners' capital |
|
|
454,508 |
|
|
339,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners' capital |
|
$ |
5,511,678 |
|
$ |
5,517,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company's capital |
|
$ |
430,941 |
|
$ |
349,175 |
|
|
Basis adjustment(3) |
|
|
702,019 |
|
|
591,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
$ |
1,132,960 |
|
$ |
941,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AssetsInvestments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
$ |
1,205,457 |
|
$ |
1,006,123 |
|
|
LiabilitiesDistributions in excess of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(72,497 |
) |
|
(65,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,132,960 |
|
$ |
941,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- These
amounts include the assets and liabilities of the following significant subsidiaries as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SDG
Macerich
Properties, L.P. |
|
Pacific
Premier
Retail
Trust |
|
Tysons
Corner
LLC |
|
As of June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
710,334 |
|
$ |
1,079,430 |
|
$ |
336,820 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
698,453 |
|
$ |
1,011,936 |
|
$ |
328,732 |
|
As of December 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
817,995 |
|
$ |
1,101,186 |
|
$ |
330,117 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
815,884 |
|
$ |
1,019,513 |
|
$ |
324,527 |
|
- (2)
- Certain
mortgage notes payable could become recourse debt to the Company should the joint venture be unable to discharge the obligations of the related
debt. As of June 30, 2011 and
12
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
December 31,
2010, a total of $372,309 and $348,658, respectively, could become recourse debt to the Company. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has indemnity
agreements from joint venture partners for $178,563 and $162,451, respectively, of the guaranteed amount.
Included
in mortgage notes payable are amounts due to affiliates of Northwestern Mutual Life ("NML") of $568,729 and $573,239 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. NML is considered a related party because it is a joint venture partner with the Company in Macerich Northwestern AssociatesBroadway Plaza. Interest expense incurred on
these borrowings amounted to $10,004 and $10,185 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $20,097 and $20,429 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
- (3)
- The
Company amortizes the difference between the cost of its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and the book value of the underlying equity into
income on a straight-line basis consistent with the lives of the underlying assets. The amortization of this difference was $2,612 and $1,368 for the three months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4,119 and $3,281 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
13
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
Combined and Condensed Statements of Operations of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SDG
Macerich
Properties, L.P. |
|
Pacific
Premier
Retail Trust |
|
Tysons
Corner
LLC |
|
Other
Joint
Ventures |
|
Total |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
20,081 |
|
$ |
32,545 |
|
$ |
14,786 |
|
$ |
86,329 |
|
$ |
153,741 |
|
|
Percentage rents |
|
|
569 |
|
|
936 |
|
|
445 |
|
|
2,344 |
|
|
4,294 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
11,024 |
|
|
13,621 |
|
|
10,215 |
|
|
41,240 |
|
|
76,100 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
658 |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
703 |
|
|
9,137 |
|
|
11,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
32,332 |
|
|
48,139 |
|
|
26,149 |
|
|
139,050 |
|
|
245,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping center and operating expenses |
|
|
12,434 |
|
|
14,612 |
|
|
8,081 |
|
|
53,365 |
|
|
88,492 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,883 |
|
|
11,701 |
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
37,962 |
|
|
63,391 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,730 |
|
|
10,325 |
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
31,083 |
|
|
53,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
29,047 |
|
|
36,638 |
|
|
16,969 |
|
|
122,410 |
|
|
205,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
(329 |
) |
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,791 |
|
$ |
11,501 |
|
$ |
9,180 |
|
$ |
16,311 |
|
$ |
55,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company's equity in net income |
|
$ |
9,394 |
|
$ |
5,850 |
|
$ |
3,490 |
|
$ |
6,473 |
|
$ |
25,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
21,898 |
|
$ |
31,905 |
|
$ |
14,477 |
|
$ |
86,510 |
|
$ |
154,790 |
|
|
Percentage rents |
|
|
472 |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
264 |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
9,982 |
|
|
11,965 |
|
|
9,468 |
|
|
41,901 |
|
|
73,316 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
851 |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
587 |
|
|
6,944 |
|
|
9,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
33,203 |
|
|
46,297 |
|
|
24,796 |
|
|
137,231 |
|
|
241,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping center and operating expenses |
|
|
10,968 |
|
|
13,392 |
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
54,093 |
|
|
86,238 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
11,588 |
|
|
12,973 |
|
|
4,131 |
|
|
38,595 |
|
|
67,287 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,777 |
|
|
9,746 |
|
|
4,659 |
|
|
30,635 |
|
|
52,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
30,333 |
|
|
36,111 |
|
|
16,575 |
|
|
123,323 |
|
|
206,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,873 |
|
$ |
10,186 |
|
$ |
8,221 |
|
$ |
14,516 |
|
$ |
35,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company's equity in net income |
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
$ |
5,170 |
|
$ |
3,728 |
|
$ |
5,427 |
|
$ |
15,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SDG
Macerich
Properties, L.P. |
|
Pacific
Premier
Retail Trust |
|
Tysons
Corner
LLC |
|
Other
Joint
Ventures |
|
Total |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
42,175 |
|
$ |
65,344 |
|
$ |
30,329 |
|
$ |
172,890 |
|
$ |
310,738 |
|
|
Percentage rents |
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
868 |
|
|
4,478 |
|
|
8,949 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
27,267 |
|
|
20,478 |
|
|
82,288 |
|
|
152,717 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
17,391 |
|
|
22,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
67,825 |
|
|
96,769 |
|
|
53,105 |
|
|
277,047 |
|
|
494,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping center and operating expenses |
|
|
26,223 |
|
|
29,206 |
|
|
16,682 |
|
|
105,748 |
|
|
177,859 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
21,343 |
|
|
23,424 |
|
|
7,818 |
|
|
76,435 |
|
|
129,020 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,199 |
|
|
20,481 |
|
|
9,906 |
|
|
61,494 |
|
|
106,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
61,765 |
|
|
73,111 |
|
|
34,406 |
|
|
243,677 |
|
|
412,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,545 |
|
|
24,545 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,566 |
|
$ |
23,658 |
|
$ |
18,699 |
|
$ |
57,915 |
|
$ |
121,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company's equity in net income |
|
$ |
10,782 |
|
$ |
12,033 |
|
$ |
7,198 |
|
$ |
25,469 |
|
$ |
55,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
44,155 |
|
$ |
63,596 |
|
$ |
29,074 |
|
$ |
175,626 |
|
$ |
312,451 |
|
|
Percentage rents |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
384 |
|
|
4,393 |
|
|
7,936 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
21,622 |
|
|
24,412 |
|
|
18,974 |
|
|
88,487 |
|
|
153,495 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
13,177 |
|
|
18,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
68,623 |
|
|
92,502 |
|
|
49,697 |
|
|
281,683 |
|
|
492,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping center and operating expenses |
|
|
25,033 |
|
|
27,077 |
|
|
15,891 |
|
|
108,807 |
|
|
176,808 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
23,085 |
|
|
26,074 |
|
|
8,149 |
|
|
77,513 |
|
|
134,821 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,402 |
|
|
18,935 |
|
|
9,251 |
|
|
62,016 |
|
|
105,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
63,520 |
|
|
72,086 |
|
|
33,291 |
|
|
248,336 |
|
|
417,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
(625 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,106 |
|
$ |
19,064 |
|
$ |
16,406 |
|
$ |
32,719 |
|
$ |
73,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company's equity in net income |
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
$ |
9,737 |
|
$ |
7,820 |
|
$ |
12,111 |
|
$ |
32,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
accounting policies used by the unconsolidated joint ventures are similar to those used by the Company.
15
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:
The Company recorded other comprehensive income related to the marking-to-market of interest rate agreements of $1,358 and $5,209 for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $6,188 and $13,188 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The
following derivatives were outstanding at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property/Entity(1)
|
|
Notional
Amount |
|
Product |
|
Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
Fair
Value |
|
La Cumbre Plaza |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
Cap |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
12/9/2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
Paradise Valley Mall |
|
|
85,000 |
|
Cap |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
9/12/2011 |
|
|
|
|
The Oaks |
|
|
150,000 |
|
Cap |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
7/1/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Westside Pavilion |
|
|
175,000 |
|
Cap |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
6/5/2012 |
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- See
additional disclosure in Note 10Mortgage Notes Payable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet
Location |
|
Fair
Value |
|
Fair
Value |
|
Balance
Sheet
Location |
|
Fair
Value |
|
Fair
Value |
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
6,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
6,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
6. Property:
Property consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,164,643 |
|
$ |
1,158,139 |
|
Building improvements |
|
|
4,951,592 |
|
|
4,934,391 |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
412,904 |
|
|
398,556 |
|
Equipment and furnishings |
|
|
120,318 |
|
|
124,530 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
292,225 |
|
|
292,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,941,682 |
|
|
6,908,507 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,321,932 |
) |
|
(1,234,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,619,750 |
|
$ |
5,674,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
expense was $54,951 and $49,905 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $108,909 and $99,029 for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $35,729 related to Shoppingtown Mall. As a result of the maturity default on the
mortgage note payable (See Note 10Mortgage Notes Payable) and on-going negotiations with the loan servicer, the Company reduced the holding period of the underlying property and
wrote down the long-lived assets to the estimated fair value of $38,968. The Company has classified the estimated fair value as Level 3 measurements due to the highly subjective
nature of computation, which involve estimates of holding period, market conditions, future occupancy levels, rental rates, capitalization rates, lease-up periods and capital improvements.
The
Company recognized a (loss) gain on the sale or write-down of assets of $(447) and $582 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and
$(484) and $582 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The
Company recognized a gain of $1,734 on the purchase of Superstition Springs Land (See Note 15Acquisitions) in connection with the GGP Exchange (See
Note 4Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. In addition, the Company recognized a gain of $1,838 on the purchase
of a 50% interest in Desert Sky Mall during the six months ended June 30, 2011 (See Note 15Acquisitions).
17
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
7. Marketable Securities:
Marketable Securities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
Government debt securities, at par value |
|
$ |
25,837 |
|
$ |
26,509 |
|
Less discount |
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,394 |
|
|
25,935 |
|
Unrealized gain |
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
27,661 |
|
$ |
28,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
contractual maturities of marketable securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
1 year or less |
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
2 to 5 years |
|
|
24,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
proceeds from maturities and interest receipts from the marketable securities are restricted to the service of the Greeley Note (See Note 11Bank and Other Notes
Payable).
8. Tenant and Other Receivables, net:
Included in tenant and other receivables, net, is an allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,523 and $5,411 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Also
included in tenant and other receivables, net, are accrued percentage rents of $1,127 and $5,827 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Included
in tenant and other receivables, net, are the following notes receivable:
On
March 31, 2006, the Company received a note receivable that is secured by a deed of trust, bears interest at 5.5% and matures on March 31, 2031. At June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, the note had a balance of $8,867 and $8,992, respectively.
On
August 18, 2009, the Company received a note receivable from J&R Holdings XV, LLC ("Pederson") that bears interest at 11.55% and matures on December 31, 2013.
Pederson is considered a related party because it has an ownership interest in Promenade at Casa Grande. The note is secured by Pederson's interest in Promenade at Casa Grande. The balance on the note
at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $3,445. Interest income on the note was $104 and $39 for the three months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively, and $206 and $83 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
18
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
9. Deferred Charges and Other Assets, net:
Deferred charges and other assets, net, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
Leasing |
|
$ |
211,251 |
|
$ |
189,853 |
|
Financing |
|
|
50,062 |
|
|
57,564 |
|
Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-place lease values |
|
|
93,722 |
|
|
99,328 |
|
|
Leasing commissions and legal costs |
|
|
28,793 |
|
|
29,088 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
156,647 |
|
|
152,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,475 |
|
|
528,000 |
|
Less accumulated amortization(1) |
|
|
(192,267 |
) |
|
(211,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
348,208 |
|
$ |
316,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- Accumulated
amortization includes $94,573 and $60,859 relating to intangible assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $3,325 and $3,646 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $6,983 and $7,779 for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
The
allocated values of above-market leases included in deferred charges and other assets, net, and below-market leases included in other accrued liabilities, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
Above-Market Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original allocated value |
|
$ |
59,927 |
|
$ |
50,615 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(37,417 |
) |
|
(36,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,510 |
|
$ |
13,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below-Market Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original allocated value |
|
$ |
117,158 |
|
$ |
121,813 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(85,827 |
) |
|
(83,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,331 |
|
$ |
38,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
allocated values of above and below-market leases are amortized into minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the individual remaining lease terms. The remaining lease
terms of below-market leases may include certain below-market fixed-rate renewal periods. In considering whether or not a lessee will execute a below-market fixed-rate lease
renewal option, the Company evaluates economic factors and certain qualitative factors at the time of acquisition such as tenant mix in the center, the Company's relationship with the tenant and the
availability of competing tenant space.
19
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Mortgage Notes Payable:
Mortgage notes payable at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount of Mortgage Notes(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Pledged as Collateral
|
|
Related Party |
|
Other |
|
Related Party |
|
Other |
|
Interest
Rate(2) |
|
Monthly
Payment
Term(3) |
|
Maturity
Date |
|
Capitola Mall(4) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
33,459 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler Fashion Center(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
157,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
159,360 |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
1,043 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Chesterfield Towne Center(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danbury Fair Mall |
|
|
118,559 |
|
|
118,559 |
|
|
109,657 |
|
|
109,657 |
|
|
5.53 |
% |
|
1,351 |
|
|
2020 |
|
Deptford Mall |
|
|
|
|
|
172,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
172,500 |
|
|
5.41 |
% |
|
778 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Deptford Mall |
|
|
|
|
|
15,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,248 |
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
101 |
|
|
2016 |
|
Fiesta Mall |
|
|
|
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
4.98 |
% |
|
348 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Flagstaff Mall |
|
|
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
|
5.03 |
% |
|
155 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Freehold Raceway Mall(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
232,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
232,900 |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
805 |
|
|
2018 |
|
Fresno Fashion Fair |
|
|
82,272 |
|
|
82,272 |
|
|
82,791 |
|
|
82,792 |
|
|
6.76 |
% |
|
1,104 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Great Northern Mall |
|
|
|
|
|
37,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,077 |
|
|
5.19 |
% |
|
234 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Hilton Village |
|
|
|
|
|
8,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,581 |
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
37 |
|
|
2012 |
|
La Cumbre Plaza(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
20,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,113 |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
18 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Northgate, The Mall at(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
38,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,115 |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
191 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Oaks, The(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
308 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Oaks, The(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
92,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
92,264 |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
182 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Pacific View(11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paradise Valley Mall(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
446 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Prescott Gateway |
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
5.86 |
% |
|
293 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Promenade at Casa Grande(13) |
|
|
|
|
|
78,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
79,104 |
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
296 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Rimrock Mall(14) |
|
|
|
|
|
40,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
40,650 |
|
|
7.57 |
% |
|
320 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Salisbury, Center at |
|
|
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
5.83 |
% |
|
559 |
|
|
2016 |
|
SanTan Village Regional Center(15) |
|
|
|
|
|
138,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
138,087 |
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
334 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Shoppingtown Mall(16) |
|
|
|
|
|
38,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
39,675 |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
319 |
|
|
2011 |
|
South Plains Mall |
|
|
|
|
|
103,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
104,132 |
|
|
6.54 |
% |
|
383 |
|
|
2015 |
|
South Towne Center |
|
|
|
|
|
87,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
87,726 |
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
554 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Towne Mall |
|
|
|
|
|
13,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
100 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Tucson La Encantada |
|
|
75,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
76,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.84 |
% |
|
448 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Twenty Ninth Street(17) |
|
|
|
|
|
107,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
106,244 |
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
275 |
|
|
2016 |
|
Valley River Center |
|
|
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
5.59 |
% |
|
559 |
|
|
2016 |
|
Valley View Center(18) |
|
|
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
596 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Victor Valley, Mall of(19) |
|
|
|
|
|
97,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
171 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Vintage Faire Mall(20) |
|
|
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
392 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Westside Pavilion(21) |
|
|
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
427 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Wilton Mall(22) |
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
40 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
276,709 |
|
$ |
2,820,109 |
|
$ |
302,344 |
|
$ |
2,957,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- The
mortgage notes payable balances include the unamortized debt premiums (discounts). Debt premiums (discounts) represent the excess (deficiency) of the
fair value of debt over (under) the principal value of debt assumed in various acquisitions and are amortized into interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt in a manner that
approximates the effective interest method.
20
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Mortgage Notes Payable: (Continued)
Debt premiums (discounts) consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Pledged as Collateral
|
|
June 30,
2011 |
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
Deptford Mall |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
$ |
(30 |
) |
Great Northern Mall |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
(82 |
) |
Hilton Village |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
(19 |
) |
Shoppingtown Mall |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
Towne Mall |
|
|
136 |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (2)
- The
interest rate disclosed represents the effective interest rate, including the debt premiums (discounts) and deferred finance costs.
- (3)
- The
payment term represents the monthly payment of principal and interest.
- (4)
- On
March 15, 2011, the loan was paid off in full.
- (5)
- On
September 30, 2009, 49.9% of the loan was assumed by a third party in connection with entering into a co-venture arrangement with that
unrelated party. See Note 12Co-Venture Arrangement.
- (6)
- On
February 1, 2011, the loan was paid off in full. As a result of the pay off of the debt, the Company recognized a loss on early extinguishment of
debt of $9,133, which included a $9,000 prepayment penalty and $133 of unamortized financing costs then outstanding.
- (7)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.88% and matures on December 9, 2011 with an extension option, subject to certain conditions, to extend to
June 9, 2012. The loan is covered by an interest rate cap agreement that effectively prevents LIBOR from exceeding 3.0% over the loan term. See Note 5Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities. The total interest rate was 2.37% and 2.44% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
- (8)
- The
construction loan allows for total borrowings of up to $60,000, bears interest at LIBOR plus 4.50% with a total interest rate floor of 6.0% and matures
on January 1, 2013, with two one-year extension options. The loan also includes options for additional borrowings of up to $20,000 depending on certain conditions. The total
interest rate was 7.00% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
- (9)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% and was to mature on July 10, 2011. On July 19, 2011, the Company exercised an option to extend
the loan to July 10, 2012 and has an additional one-year extension option. The Company placed an interest rate cap agreement on the loan that effectively prevented LIBOR from
exceeding 6.25% on $150,000 of the loan amount that expired on July 1, 2011. See Note 5Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The interest rate cap agreement was not
renewed following its expiration on July 1, 2011. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total interest rate was 2.24%.
- (10)
- The
construction loan allowed for total borrowings of up to $135,000, bore interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 1.75% to 2.10%, depending on certain
conditions and was to mature on July 10, 2011. On July 19, 2011, the Company modified the loan to bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% and extended the loan to July 10, 2012 with an
additional one-year extension option. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total interest rate was 2.83%.
- (11)
- On
June 1, 2011, the loan was paid off in full.
- (12)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% with a total interest rate floor of 5.50% and matures on August 31, 2012 with two one-year
extension options. The loan is covered by an interest rate cap agreement that effectively prevents LIBOR from exceeding 5.0% until September 12, 2011. See Note 5Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total interest rate was 6.30%.
- (13)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% with a LIBOR rate floor of 0.50% and matures on December 30, 2013. At June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the total interest rate was 5.21%.
21
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Mortgage Notes Payable: (Continued)
- (14)
- On
July 1, 2011, the loan was paid off in full.
- (15)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.10% and matures on June 13, 2012, with a one-year extension option. At June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the total interest rate was 2.90% and 2.94%, respectively.
- (16)
- As
of May 10, 2011, the note is in maturity default. The Company is in negotiations with the loan servicer, which the Company anticipates will
likely result in either a modification of loan terms or the transition of the underlying property to the loan servicer or a receiver. The loan is non-recourse to the Company. The Company
recognized an impairment charge of $35,729 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to write down the carrying value of the underlying asset to its estimated fair value. See
Note 6Property.
- (17)
- On
January 18, 2011, the Company replaced the existing loan on the property with a new $107,000 loan that bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.63% and
matures on January 18, 2016. At June 30, 2011, the total interest rate was 3.08%.
- (18)
- On
July 15, 2010, a court appointed receiver ("Receiver") assumed operational control of Valley View Center and responsibility for managing all
aspects of the property. The Company anticipates the disposition of the asset, which is under the control of the Receiver, will be executed through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or by some
other means, and is expected to be completed within the next twelve months. Although the Company is no longer funding any cash shortfall, it will continue to record the operations of Valley View
Center until the title for the Center is transferred and its obligation for the loan is discharged. Once title to the Center is transferred, the Company will remove the net assets and liabilities from
the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The mortgage note payable on Valley View Center is non-recourse to the Company.
- (19)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.60% and was due to mature on May 6, 2011, with two one-year extension options. On May 6,
2011, the Company exercised an option to extend the maturity to May 6, 2012. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total interest rate on the loan was 2.11% and 6.94%,
respectively.
- (20)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.0% and matures on April 27, 2015. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total interest
rate was 3.48% and 8.37%, respectively.
- (21)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.00% and was set to mature on June 5, 2011. The Company has exercised an option to extend the loan to
June 5, 2012 and has an additional one-year extension option. The loan is covered by an interest rate cap agreement that effectively prevents LIBOR from exceeding 5.50% over the
loan term. See Note 5Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total interest rate on the loan was 2.93% and 7.81%,
respectively.
- (22)
- The
loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.675% and matures August 1, 2013. As additional collateral for the loan, the Company is required to maintain
a deposit of $40,000 with the lender. The interest on the deposit is not restricted. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total interest rate on the loan was 1.19% and 1.26%,
respectively.
Most of the mortgage loan agreements contain a prepayment penalty provision for the early extinguishment of the debt.
The
Company expects all 2011 loan maturities, except Valley View Center and Shoppingtown Mall, will be refinanced, restructured, extended and/or paid-off from the Company's
line of credit or with cash on hand.
Total
interest expense capitalized was $3,284 and $8,320 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $6,619 and $16,509 for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Related
party mortgage notes payable are amounts due to affiliates of NML. See Note 18Related-Party Transactions for interest expense associated with loans from NML.
22
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Mortgage Notes Payable: (Continued)
The
fair value of mortgage notes payable at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $3,206,840 and $3,438,674, respectively, based on current interest rates for comparable
loans. The method for computing fair value was determined using a present value model and an interest rate that included a credit value adjustment based on the estimated value of the property that
serves as collateral for the underlying debt.
11. Bank and Other Notes Payable:
Bank and other notes payable consist of the following:
Convertible Senior Notes ("Senior Notes"):
On March 16, 2007, the Company issued $950,000 in Senior Notes that are to mature on March 15, 2012. The Senior Notes
bear interest at 3.25%, payable semiannually, are senior to unsecured debt of the Company and are guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. Prior to December 14, 2011, upon the occurrence of
certain specified events, the Senior Notes will be convertible at the option of the holder into cash, shares of the Company's common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company's common
stock, at the election of the Company, at an initial conversion rate of 8.9702 shares per $1 principal amount. On and after December 15, 2011, the Senior Notes will be convertible at any time
prior to the second business day preceding the maturity date at the option of the holder at the initial conversion rate. The initial conversion price of approximately $111.48 per share represented a
20% premium over the closing price of the Company's common stock on March 12, 2007. In addition, the Senior Notes are covered by two capped calls that effectively increased the conversion price
of the Senior Notes to approximately $130.06, which represents a 40% premium to the March 12, 2007 closing price of $92.90 per common share of the Company. The initial conversion rate is
subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. Holders of the Senior Notes do not have the right to require the Company to repurchase the Senior Notes prior to maturity except in connection with
the occurrence of certain fundamental change transactions.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company repurchased and retired $18,468 of the Senior Notes for $18,191 and recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of
$489. The repurchase was funded by cash proceeds from the Company's April 2010 common stock offering.
The
carrying value of the Senior Notes at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $612,179 and $606,971, respectively, which included an unamortized discount of $7,453 and
$12,661, respectively. The unamortized discount is amortized into interest expense over the term of the Senior Notes in a manner that approximates the effective interest method. As of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, the effective interest rate was 5.41%. The fair value of the Senior Notes at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $619,632 based on the quoted
market price on each date.
Line of Credit:
The Company had a $1,500,000 revolving line of credit that bore interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 0.75% to 1.10% depending on the
Company's overall leverage that matured on April 25, 2011. On May 2, 2011, the Company obtained a new $1,500,000 revolving line of credit that bears interest at
23
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
11. Bank and Other Notes Payable: (Continued)
LIBOR
plus a spread of 1.75% to 3.0% depending on the Company's overall leverage and matures on May 2, 2015 with a one-year extension option. Based on the Company's current leverage
levels, the borrowing rate on the new facility is LIBOR plus 2.0%. The line of credit can be expanded, depending on certain conditions, up to a total facility of $2,000,000. As of June 30,
2011, borrowings under the line of credit were $145,000 at an average interest rate of 2.74%. The fair value of the line of credit at June 30, 2011 was $140,950 based on a present value model
using credit interest rate spread offered to the Company for comparable debt.
Greeley Note:
On July 27, 2006, concurrent with the sale of Greeley Mall, the Company provided marketable securities to replace Greeley Mall
as collateral for the mortgage note payable on the property (See Note 7Marketable Securities). As a result of this transaction, the mortgage note payable was reclassified to bank
and other notes payable. This note bears interest at an effective rate of 6.34% and matures in September 2013. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Greeley note had a balance
outstanding of $25,241 and $25,624, respectively. The fair value of the note at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $27,171 and $23,967, respectively, based on current interest rates
for comparable loans. The method for computing fair value was determined using a present value model and an interest rate that included a credit value adjustment based on the estimated value of the
collateral for the underlying debt.
As
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all applicable financial loan covenants.
12. Co-Venture Arrangement:
On September 30, 2009, the Company formed a joint venture whereby a third party acquired a 49.9% interest in Freehold Raceway Mall and Chandler Fashion Center. As part of this
transaction, the Company issued a warrant in favor of the third party to purchase 935,358 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $46.68 per share. See "Warrants" in
Note 14Stockholders' Equity. The Company received approximately $174,650 in cash proceeds for the overall transaction, of which $6,496 was attributed to the warrants.
As
a result of the Company having certain rights under the agreement to repurchase the assets after the seventh year of the venture formation, the transaction did not qualify for sale
treatment. The Company, however, is not obligated to repurchase the assets. The transaction has been accounted for as a profit-sharing arrangement, and, accordingly, the assets, liabilities and
operations of the properties remain on the books of the Company and a co-venture obligation was established for the net cash proceeds received from the third party less costs allocated to
the warrant. The co-venture obligation is increased for the allocation of income to the co-venture partner and decreased for distributions to the co-venture
partner.
24
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Noncontrolling Interests:
The Company allocates net income of the Operating Partnership based on the weighted average ownership interest during the period. The net income of the Operating Partnership that is not
attributable to the Company is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as noncontrolling interests. The Company adjusts the noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership at the
end of each period to reflect its ownership interest in the Company. The Company had a 92% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The
remaining 8% limited partnership interest as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, was owned by certain of the Company's executive officers and directors, certain of their affiliates,
and other third party investors in the form of units of the Operating Partnership ("OP Units"). The OP Units may be redeemed for shares of stock or cash, at the Company's option. The redemption value
for each OP Unit as of any balance sheet date is the amount equal to the average of the closing price per share of the Company's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as reported on the New York
Stock Exchange for the ten trading days ending on the respective balance sheet date. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the aggregate redemption value of the
then-outstanding OP Units not owned by the Company was $574,510 and $538,794, respectively.
The
Company issued common and preferred units of MACWH, LP in April 2005 in connection with the acquisition of the Wilmorite portfolio. The common and preferred units of
MACWH, LP are redeemable at the election of the holder, the Company may redeem them for cash or shares of the Company's stock at the Company's option and they are classified as permanent
equity.
Included
in permanent equity are outside ownership interests in various consolidated joint ventures. The joint ventures do not have rights that require the Company to redeem the
ownership interests in either cash or stock.
The
outside ownership interests in the Company's joint venture in Shoppingtown Mall have a purchase option for $11,366. In addition, under certain conditions as defined by the
partnership agreement, these partners have the right to "put" their partnership interests to the Company. Due to the redemption feature of the ownership interest in Shoppingtown Mall, these
noncontrolling interests have been included in temporary equity.
14. Stockholders' Equity:
Stock Dividends:
On March 22, 2010, the Company issued 1,449,542 common shares to its common stockholders and OP Unit holders in connection with
a declaration of a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share of common stock to holders of record on February 16, 2010, consisting of a combination of cash and shares of the Company's common stock.
The cash component of the dividend (not including cash paid in lieu of fractional shares) was 10% in the aggregate, or $0.06 per share, with the balance paid in shares of the Company's common stock.
In
accordance with the provisions of Internal Revenue Service Revenue Procedure 2010-12, stockholders were asked to make an election to receive the dividends all in cash or
all in shares. To the extent that more than 10% of cash was elected in the aggregate, the cash portion was prorated. Stockholders who elected to receive the dividends in cash received a cash payment
of at least $0.06 per
25
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Stockholders' Equity: (Continued)
share.
Stockholders who did not make an election received 10% in cash and 90% in shares of common stock. The number of shares issued on March 22, 2010 as a result of the dividend was calculated
based on the volume weighted average trading prices of the Company's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on March 10, 2010 through March 12, 2010 of $38.53 per share.
Warrants:
On September 3, 2009, the Company issued three warrants in connection with the sale of a 75% ownership interest in FlatIron
Crossing. The warrants provided for a purchase in the aggregate of 1,250,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The warrants were valued at $8,068 and recorded as a credit to additional
paid-in capital. In May 2010, the warrants were exercised pursuant to the holders' net issue exercise request and the Company delivered a cash payment of $17,589 in exchange for the
warrants.
On
September 30, 2009, the Company issued a warrant in connection with its formation of a co-venture to own and operate Freehold Raceway Mall and Chandler Fashion
Center. (See Note 12Co-Venture Arrangement.) The warrant provides for the purchase of 935,358 shares of the Company's common stock. The warrant was valued at $6,496 and
recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital. The warrant was immediately exercisable upon its issuance and will expire 30 days after the refinancing or repayment of each loan
encumbering the Centers has closed. The warrant has an exercise price of $46.68 per share, with such price subject to anti-dilutive adjustments. The warrant allows for either gross or net
issue settlement at the option of the warrant holder. In the event that the warrant holder elects a net issue settlement, the Company may elect to settle the warrant in cash or shares; provided,
however, that in the event the Company elects to deliver cash, the holder may elect to instead have the exercise of the warrant satisfied in shares. In addition, the Company entered into a
registration rights agreement with the warrant holder whereby the Company provided certain registration rights regarding the resale of shares of common stock underlying the warrant.
The
issuance of the warrants was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"), pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Each
investor represented that it was an accredited investor, as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D, and that it was acquiring the securities for its own account, not as nominee or agent,
and not with a view to the resale or distribution of any part thereof in violation of the Securities Act.
Stock Offering:
On April 20, 2010, the Company completed an offering of 30,000,000 newly issued shares of its common stock and on
April 23, 2010 issued an additional 1,000,000 newly issued shares of common stock in connection with the underwriters' exercise of its over-allotment option. The net proceeds of the
offering, after giving effect to the issuance and sale of all 31,000,000 shares of common stock at an initial price to the public of $41.00 per share, were approximately $1,220,829 after deducting
underwriting discounts, commissions and other transaction costs. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds of the offering to pay down
its line of credit in full and reduce certain property indebtedness. The Company used the remaining cash for debt repayments and/or general corporate purposes.
26
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
15. Acquisitions:
Desert Sky Mall:
On February 28, 2011, the Company acquired the additional 50% ownership interest in Desert Sky Mall, an 893,561 square foot
regional shopping center in Phoenix, Arizona, that it did not own for $27,625. The acquisition was completed in order to gain 100% ownership and control over this well located asset. The purchase
price was funded by a cash payment of $1,875 and the assumption of the third party's pro rata share of the mortgage note payable on the property of $25,750. Concurrent with the purchase of the
partnership interest, the Company paid off the $51,500 loan on the property. Prior to the acquisition, the Company had accounted for its investment under the equity method (See
Note 4Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures). As a result of this transaction, the Company obtained 100% ownership of Desert Sky Mall.
The
following is a summary of the allocation of the fair value of Desert Sky Mall:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
$ |
46,603 |
|
Deferred charges, net |
|
|
5,474 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,057 |
|
Tenant receivables |
|
|
202 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
4,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
62,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage note payable |
|
|
51,500 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
33 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
54,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of acquired net assets (at 100% ownership) |
|
$ |
8,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company determined that the purchase price represented the fair value of the additional ownership interest in Desert Sky Mall that was acquired. Accordingly, the Company also
determined that the fair value of the acquired ownership interest in Desert Sky Mall equaled the fair value of the Company's existing ownership interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of existing ownership interest (at 50% ownership) |
|
$ |
4,134 |
|
Carrying value of investment in Desert Sky Mall |
|
|
(2,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on remeasurement |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company has included the gain in (loss) gain on remeasurement, sale or write down of assets, net for the six months ended June 30, 2011. See
Note 6Property.
Since
the date of acquisition, the Company has included Desert Sky Mall in its consolidated financial statements. Desert Sky Mall has generated incremental revenue of $3,629 and
incremental expense of $3,281.
27
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
15. Acquisitions: (Continued)
Superstition Springs Land:
On June 3, 2011, the Company acquired the additional 50% ownership interest in Superstition Springs Land that it did not own in
connection with the GGP Exchange (See Note 4Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures). Prior to the acquisition, the Company had accounted for its investment in Superstition
Springs Land under the equity method. As a result of this transaction, the Company obtained 100% ownership of the land.
The
Company recorded the fair value of Superstition Springs Land at $12,914. As a result of obtaining control of this property, the Company recognized a gain of $1,734, which is included
in (loss) gain on remeasurement, sale or writedown of assets, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. See Note 6Property. Since the date of acquisition, the
Company has included Superstition Springs Land in its consolidated financial statements.
Other:
On April 29, 2011, the Company purchased a fee interest in a freestanding Kohl's store at Capitola Mall for $28,500. The
purchase price was paid from cash on hand.
16. Discontinued Operations:
On March 4, 2011, the Company sold a former Mervyn's store in Santa Fe, New Mexico, for $3,383, resulting in a loss of $2,261. The proceeds from the sale were used for general
corporate purposes.
On
June 3, 2011, the Company disposed of six anchor stores at centers not owned by the Company (collectively referred to as the "GGP Anchor Stores"), including five former
Mervyn's stores, as part of the GGP Exchange (See Note 4Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures). The Company determined that the fair value received in exchange for the GGP
Anchor Stores was equal to their carrying value.
Revenues
from discontinued operations consisted of $844 and $654 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $1,862 and $1,307 for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Income (loss) from discontinued operations was $111 and $(329) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $136 and $(652)
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
17. Commitments and Contingencies:
The Company has certain properties subject to non-cancelable operating ground leases. The leases expire at various times through 2107, subject in some cases to options to
extend the terms of the lease. Certain leases provide for contingent rent payments based on a percentage of base rental income, as defined in the lease. Ground rent expense was $2,172 and $1,181 for
the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4,384 and $2,768 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No contingent rent was incurred during
the three or six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.
28
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
17. Commitments and Contingencies: (Continued)
As
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company was contingently liable for $22,376 and $26,771, respectively, in letters of credit guaranteeing performance by the
Company of certain obligations relating to the Centers. The Company does not believe that these letters of credit will result in a liability to the Company. In addition, the Company has a $11,366
letter of credit outstanding at June 30, 2011 that serves as collateral to a liability assumed in the acquisition of Shoppingtown Mall.
The
Company has entered into a number of construction agreements related to its redevelopment and development activities. Obligations under these agreements are contingent upon the
completion of the services within the guidelines specified in the agreement. At June 30, 2011, the Company had $10,016 in outstanding obligations under these agreements, which it believes will
be settled in 2011.
A
putative class action complaint was filed on September 1, 2010 involving a single plaintiff based on alleged wage and hour violations. The parties have reached a settlement that
is subject to court approval. The court hearing to preliminarily approve the settlement is scheduled for September 2, 2011.
The Company has accrued an estimate for the amount of the settlement, which is not material to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
18. Related-Party Transactions:
Certain unconsolidated joint ventures and third-parties have engaged the Management Companies to manage the operations of the Centers. Under these arrangements, the Management Companies
are reimbursed for compensation paid to on-site employees, leasing agents and project managers at the Centers, as well as insurance costs and other administrative expenses. The following
are fees charged to unconsolidated joint ventures and third-party managed properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Management Fees |
|
$ |
6,549 |
|
$ |
6,726 |
|
$ |
12,811 |
|
$ |
13,636 |
|
Development and Leasing Fees |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
6,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,910 |
|
$ |
10,563 |
|
$ |
16,563 |
|
$ |
19,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain
mortgage notes on the properties are held by NML (See Note 10Mortgage Notes Payable). Interest expense in connection with these notes was $4,086 and $3,103
for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $8,575 and $6,205 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included in accounts payable and
accrued expenses is interest payable on these notes of $1,355 and $1,439 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
As
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had loans to unconsolidated joint ventures of $3,459 and $3,095, respectively. Interest income associated with these
notes was $49 and $81 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $143 and $113 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These loans
represent initial funds advanced to development stage
projects prior to construction loan funding. Correspondingly, loan payables in the same amount have been accrued as an obligation by the various joint ventures.
29
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
18. Related-Party Transactions: (Continued)
Due
from affiliates of $5,269 and $6,599 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, represents unreimbursed costs and fees due from unconsolidated joint ventures
under management agreements.
19. Share and Unit-Based Plans:
On February 28, 2011, the Company granted 190,000 limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership ("LTIP Units") under the Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") to
four executive officers at a weighted average grant date fair value of $43.30 per LTIP Unit. The new grants vest over a service period ending January 31, 2012 based on the percentile ranking of
the Company in terms of total return to stockholders (the "Total Return") per common stock share relative to the Total Return of a group of peer REITs, as measured at the end of the measurement
period. Upon the occurrence of specified events and subject to the satisfaction of applicable vesting conditions, LTIP Units (after conversion into OP Units) are ultimately redeemable for common stock
of the Company on a one-unit for one-share basis.
The
fair value of the Company's LTIP Units granted in 2011 was estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo Simulation model. The stock price of the Company, along with the stock
prices of the group of peer REITs, was assumed to follow the Multivariate Geometric Brownian Motion Process. Multivariate Geometric Brownian Motion modeling is commonly used in financial markets, as
it allows the modeled quantity (in this case, the stock price) to vary randomly from its current value based on the stock price's expected volatility and current market interest rates. The
volatilities of the returns on
the price of the Company and the peer group REITs were estimated based on a .92-year look-back period. The expected growth rate of the stock prices over the derived service
period was determined with consideration of the risk free rate as of the grant date.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2011, as part of the separation agreements with three former employees, the Company modified the terms of 20,949 stock units and 2,281
stock awards then outstanding. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, as part of the separation agreements with three other former employees, the Company modified the terms of 40,621
stock units and 40,000 SARs then outstanding. As a result of these modifications, the Company recognized additional compensation cost of $2,378 and $3,333 during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively.
30
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
19. Share and Unit-Based Plans: (Continued)
The
following summarizes the compensation cost under the share and unit-based plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
LTIP units |
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
$ |
3,941 |
|
$ |
4,477 |
|
$ |
5,441 |
|
Stock awards |
|
|
84 |
|
|
524 |
|
|
578 |
|
|
2,086 |
|
Stock units |
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
5,046 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
SARs |
|
|
302 |
|
|
656 |
|
|
623 |
|
|
951 |
|
Phantom stock units |
|
|
242 |
|
|
216 |
|
|
482 |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,133 |
|
$ |
9,073 |
|
$ |
11,902 |
|
$ |
14,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company capitalized share and unit-based compensation costs of $2,098 and $5,236 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $5,012 and
$7,311 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The
following table summarizes the activity of the non-vested share and unit based plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP Units |
|
Stock Awards |
|
Phantom Stock |
|
SARs |
|
Stock Units |
|
|
|
Units |
|
Value(1) |
|
Shares |
|
Value(1) |
|
Units |
|
Value(1) |
|
Units |
|
Value(1) |
|
Shares |
|
Value(1) |
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
272,226 |
|
$ |
50.68 |
|
|
63,351 |
|
$ |
53.69 |
|
|
29,783 |
|
$ |
34.18 |
|
|
1,059,122 |
|
$ |
7.51 |
|
|
1,038,549 |
|
$ |
7.17 |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
422,631 |
|
|
46.38 |
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
48.47 |
|
|
5,870 |
|
|
48.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,463 |
|
|
48.36 |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(504,857 |
) |
|
49.85 |
|
|
(53,571 |
) |
|
57.36 |
|
|
(12,028 |
) |
|
40.09 |
|
|
(1,034,122 |
) |
|
7.51 |
|
|
(519,272 |
) |
|
7.17 |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
7.51 |
|
|
(7,400 |
) |
|
12.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
190,000 |
|
$ |
43.30 |
|
|
21,130 |
|
$ |
40.68 |
|
|
23,625 |
|
$ |
34.84 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
576,340 |
|
$ |
11.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- Value
represents the weighted-average grant date fair value.
Unrecognized compensation cost of share and unit-based plans at June 30, 2011 consisted of $5,233 from LTIP Units, $736 from
stock awards, $823 from phantom stock units and $3,758 from stock units.
20. Income Taxes:
The Company has made taxable REIT subsidiary elections for all of its corporate subsidiaries other than its qualified REIT subsidiaries. The elections, effective for the year beginning
January 1, 2001 and future years were made pursuant to section 856(l) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company's Taxable REIT Subsidiaries ("TRSs") are subject to corporate level income
taxes which are provided for in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company's primary TRSs include Macerich Management Company and Macerich Arizona Partners LLC.
31
Table of Contents
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
20. Income Taxes: (Continued)
The
income tax benefit of the TRSs is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Current |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax benefit |
|
$ |
1,768 |
|
$ |
1,375 |
|
$ |
4,246 |
|
$ |
2,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
net operating loss carryforwards are currently scheduled to expire through 2031, beginning in 2021. Net deferred tax assets of $24,592 and $19,525 were included in deferred charges
and other assets, net at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The
tax returns for the years 2007-2010 remain open to examination by the taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. The Company does not expect that the total
amount of unrecognized tax benefits will materially change within the next 12 months.
21. Subsequent Events:
On July 1, 2011, the Company's joint venture in Pacific Premier Retail Trust replaced the existing mortgage note payable on Los Cerritos Center with a new $200,000 mortgage note
payable that bears interest at 4.46% and matures on July 1, 2018.
On
July 22, 2011, the Company acquired the Fashion Outlets of Niagara Falls, a 526,000 square foot outlet center in Niagara Falls, New York. The initial purchase price of $200,000
was funded by a cash payment of $78,579 and the assumption of the mortgage note payable of $121,421. The cash purchase price was funded from borrowings under the Company's line of credit. The final
purchase price may also include future contingent consideration.
On
July 29, 2011, the Company announced a dividend/distribution of $0.50 per share for common stockholders and OP Unit holders of record on August 19, 2011. All
dividends/distributions will be paid 100% in cash on September 8, 2011.
32
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
IMPORTANT INFORMATION RELATED TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Macerich Company (the "Company") contains or incorporates statements that
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Any statements that do not relate to historical or current facts or matters are forward-looking statements. You
can identify some of the forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "projects," "predicts," "plans,"
"believes," "seeks,"
"estimates," "scheduled" and variations of these words and similar expressions. Statements concerning current conditions may also be forward-looking if they imply a continuation of current conditions.
Forward- looking statements appear in a number of places in this Form 10-Q and include statements regarding, among other matters:
-
- expectations regarding the Company's growth;
-
- the Company's beliefs regarding its acquisition, redevelopment, development, leasing and operational activities and
opportunities, including the performance of its retailers;
-
- the Company's acquisition, disposition and other strategies;
-
- regulatory matters pertaining to compliance with governmental regulations;
-
- the Company's capital expenditure plans and expectations for obtaining capital for expenditures;
-
- the Company's expectations regarding income tax benefits;
-
- the Company's expectations regarding its financial condition or results of operations; and
-
- the Company's expectations for refinancing its indebtedness, entering into and servicing debt obligations and entering
into joint venture arrangements.
Stockholders
are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual
results, performance or achievements of the Company or the industry to differ materially from the Company's future results, performance or achievements, or those of the industry, expressed or implied
in such forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review the disclosures we make concerning risks and other factors that may affect our business and operating results, including those
made in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as our other reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, which disclosures are incorporated herein by reference. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this
document. The Company does not intend, and undertakes no obligation, to update any forward-looking information to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events, unless required by law to do so.
Management's Overview and Summary
The Company is involved in the acquisition, ownership, development, redevelopment, management and leasing of regional and community
shopping centers located throughout the United States. The Company is the sole general partner of, and owns a majority of the ownership interests in, the Operating Partnership. As of June 30,
2011, the Operating Partnership owned or had an ownership interest in 70 regional shopping centers and 14 community shopping centers totaling approximately 71 million square feet of gross
leasable area. These 84 regional and community shopping centers are referred to hereinafter as the "Centers," unless the context otherwise requires. The Company is a self-administered and
self-managed REIT and conducts all of its operations through the Operating Partnership and the Management Companies.
The
following discussion is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. It compares the
results of
33
Table of Contents
operations
for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to the results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and it compares the results of operations and cash flow for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 to the results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
Acquisitions:
On February 24, 2011, the Company increased its ownership interest in Kierland Commons, a 434,690 square foot community center
in Scottsdale, Arizona, from 24.5% to 50%. The Company's share of the purchase price for this transaction was $34.2 million in cash and the assumption of $18.6 million of existing debt.
On
February 28, 2011, the Company, in a 50/50 joint venture, acquired The Shops at Atlas Park, a 400,000 square foot community center in Queens, New York, for a total purchase
price of $53.8 million. The Company's share of the purchase price was $26.9 million and was funded from the Company's cash on hand.
On
February 28, 2011, the Company acquired the additional 50% ownership interest in Desert Sky Mall, an 893,561 square foot regional shopping center in Phoenix, Arizona, that it
did not own. The total purchase price was $27.6 million which included the assumption of the third party's pro rata share of the mortgage note payable on the property of $25.7 million.
Concurrent with the purchase of the partnership interest, the Company paid off the $51.5 million loan on the property.
On
April 29, 2011, the Company purchased a fee interest in a freestanding Kohl's store at Capitola Mall for $28.5 milion. The purchase price was paid from cash on hand.
On
June 3, 2011, the Company acquired an additional 33.3% ownership interest in Arrowhead Towne Center, a 1,196,941 square foot regional shopping center in Glendale, Arizona, an
additional 33.3% ownership interest in Superstition Springs Center, a 1,204,803 square foot regional shopping center in Mesa, Arizona and a 50% ownership interest in the land under Superstition
Springs Center that it did not already own in exchange for the Company's ownership interest in six anchor stores, including five former Mervyn's stores and a cash payment of $75.0 million. The
cash purchase price was funded from borrowings under the Company's line of credit. This transaction is referred herein as the "GGP Exchange".
Desert
Sky Mall, the Kohl's store at Capitola Mall and the land under Superstition Springs Center are referred to herein as the "Acquisition Properties".
Mervyn's:
In December 2007, the Company purchased a portfolio of ground leasehold interest and/or fee interests in 39 freestanding Mervyn's
stores located in the Southwest United States. In January 2008, the Company purchased a ground leasehold interest in a freestanding Mervyn's store located in Hayward, California and in February 2008,
the Company purchased a fee simple interest in a freestanding Mervyn's store located in Monrovia, California. These former Mervyn's stores are referred to herein as the "Mervyn's Properties." Mervyn's
filed for bankruptcy protection in July 2008 and rejected all of its leases during the remainder of the year.
On
March 4, 2011, the Company sold a fee interest in a former Mervyn's store for $3.4 million, resulting in a loss on sale of $2.2 million. The Company used the
proceeds from the sale for general corporate purposes.
On
June 3, 2011, the Company disposed of five former Mervyn's stores in connection with the GGP Exchange (See "Acquisitions").
As
of June 30, 2011, six former Mervyn's stores in the Company's portfolio remain vacant. The Company is currently seeking replacement tenants for these spaces.
34
Table of Contents
Other Transactions and Events:
On July 15, 2010, a court appointed receiver ("Receiver") assumed operational control of Valley View Center and responsibility
for managing all aspects of the property. The Company anticipates the disposition of the asset, which is under the control of the Receiver, will be executed through foreclosure, deed in lieu of
foreclosure, or by some other means, and will be completed within the next twelve months. Although the Company is no longer funding any cash shortfall, it continues to record the operations of the
Valley View Center until the title for the Center is transferred and its obligation for the loan is discharged. Once title to the Center is transferred, the Company will remove the net assets and
liabilities from the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The mortgage note payable on Valley View Center is non-recourse to the Company.
On
April 1, 2011, the Company's joint venture in SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. conveyed Granite Run Mall to the mortgage note lender with a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The mortgage note
was non-recourse. The Company's pro rata share of gain on early extinguishment of debt was $7.8 million.
As
of May 10, 2011, the mortgage note payable on Shoppingtown Mall is in maturity default. The Company is in negotiations with the loan servicer, which will likely result in
either a modification of loan terms or the transition of the underlying property to the loan servicer or a receiver. The loan is non-recourse to the Company. As a result of the maturity
default and on-going negotations with the loan servicer, the Company reduced the holding period and recognized an impairment charge of $35.7 million to write-down the long-lived assets to its
estimated fair value.
Inflation:
In the last three years, inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company because of a relatively low inflation rate. Most of
the leases at the Centers have rent adjustments periodically through the lease term. These rent increases are either in fixed increments or based on an annual multiple of increases in the Consumer
Price Index ("CPI"). In addition, about 6% to 13% of the leases expire each year, which enables the Company to replace existing leases with new leases at higher base rents if the rents of the existing
leases are below the then existing market rate. Historically the majority of the leases also required the tenants to pay their pro rata share of operating expenses. In January 2005, the Company began
entering into leases that require tenants to pay a stated amount for operating expenses, generally excluding property taxes, regardless of the expenses actually incurred at any Center. This change
shifts the burden of cost control to the Company.
Seasonality:
The shopping center industry is seasonal in nature, particularly in the fourth quarter during the holiday season when retailer
occupancy and retail sales are typically at their highest levels. In addition, shopping malls achieve a substantial portion of their specialty (temporary retailer) rents during the holiday season and
the majority of percentage rent is recognized in the fourth quarter. As a result of the above, earnings are generally higher in the fourth quarter.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Some
of these estimates and assumptions include judgments on revenue recognition, estimates for common area maintenance and real estate tax accruals, provisions for uncollectible
accounts, impairment of long-lived assets, the allocation of purchase price between tangible and intangible assets, and estimates for environmental matters. The Company's significant
accounting policies are described
35
Table of Contents
in
more detail in Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company's Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.
However, the following policies are deemed to be critical.
Revenue Recognition:
Minimum rental revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. The difference between
the amount of rent due in a year and the amount recorded as rental income is referred to as the "straight line rent adjustment." Currently, 59% of the Mall Store and Freestanding Store leases contain
provisions for CPI rent increases periodically throughout the term of the lease. The Company believes that using an annual multiple of CPI increases rather than fixed contractual rent increases
results in revenue recognition that more closely matches the cash revenue from each lease and will provide more consistent rent growth throughout the term of the leases. Percentage rents are
recognized when the tenants' specified sales targets have been met. Estimated recoveries from certain tenants for their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance and other shopping center
operating expenses are recognized as revenues in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. Other tenants pay a fixed rate and these tenant recoveries' revenues are recognized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the related leases.
Property:
The Company capitalizes costs incurred in redevelopment and development of properties. The costs of land and buildings under
development include specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction
costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs and other costs incurred during the period of development. Capitalized costs are allocated to the specific components of a project
that are benefited. The Company considers a construction project as completed and held available for occupancy and ceases capitalization of costs when the areas under development have been
substantially completed.
Maintenance
and repair expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Costs for major replacements and betterments, which includes HVAC equipment, roofs, parking lots, etc., are
capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Gains and losses are recognized upon disposal or retirement of the related assets and are reflected in earnings.
Property
is recorded at cost and is depreciated using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
5 - 40 years |
Tenant improvements |
|
5 - 7 years |
Equipment and furnishings |
|
5 - 7 years |
Accounting for Acquisitions:
The Company first determines the value of land and buildings utilizing an "as if vacant" methodology. The Company then assigns a fair
value to any debt assumed at acquisition. The purchase price is allocated to tenant improvements and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities. Tenant improvements represent the tangible assets
associated with the existing leases valued on a fair value basis at the acquisition date prorated over the remaining lease terms. The tenant improvements are classified as an asset under property and
are depreciated over the remaining lease terms. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities relate to the value of in-place operating leases which come in three forms:
(i) leasing commissions and legal costs, which represent the value associated with "cost avoidance" of acquiring in-place leases, such as lease commissions paid under terms
generally experienced in the Company's markets; (ii) value of in-place leases, which represents the estimated loss of revenue and of costs incurred for the period required to lease
the "assumed vacant" property to the
36
Table of Contents
occupancy
level when purchased; and (iii) above or below market value of in-place leases, which represents the difference between the contractual rents and market rents at the time
of the acquisition, discounted for tenant credit risks. Leasing commissions and legal costs are recorded in deferred charges and other assets and are amortized over the remaining lease terms. The
value of in-place leases are recorded in deferred charges and other assets and amortized over the remaining lease terms plus an estimate of renewal of the acquired leases. Above or below
market leases are classified in deferred charges and other assets or in other accrued liabilities, depending on whether the contractual terms are above or below market. The allocated values of above
and below-market leases are amortized into minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the individual remaining lease terms. The remaining lease terms of below-market leases may include
certain below-market fixed-rate renewal periods. In considering whether or not a lessee will execute a below-market fixed-rate lease renewal option, the Company evaluates
economic factors and certain qualitative factors at the time of acquisition such as tenant mix in the center, the Company's relationship with the tenant and the availability of competing tenant space.
Asset Impairment:
The Company assesses whether an indicator of impairment in the value of its long-lived assets exists by considering factors
such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other economic factors. Such factors include the tenant's ability to perform their
duties and pay rent under the terms of the leases. In addition, a decrease in the estimated holding period of long-lived assets can increase the likelihood of impairment. Many factors may
influence management's estimate of holding periods, including market conditions, accessibility of capital and credits markets and recent sales activity of properties in the same market. The Company
may recognize impairment losses if the cash flows are not sufficient to cover its investment. Such a loss would be determined as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of a
center.
The
Company reviews its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for a series of operating losses and other factors that may indicate that a decrease in the value of its investments
has occurred which is other-than-temporary. The investment in each unconsolidated joint venture is evaluated periodically, and as deemed necessary, for recoverability and
valuation declines that are other than temporary.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of
the reporting entity and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions.
Level 1
inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than
quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are
observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any,
related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy
within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company's assessment of the significance
of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The
Company calculates the fair value of financial instruments and includes this additional information in the notes to consolidated financial statements when the fair value is different
than the
37
Table of Contents
carrying
value of those financial instruments. When the fair value reasonably approximates the carrying value, no additional disclosure is made.
Deferred Charges:
Costs relating to obtaining tenant leases are deferred and amortized over the initial term of the agreement using the
straight-line method. As these deferred leasing costs represent productive assets incurred in connection with the Company's provision of leasing arrangements at the Centers, the related
cash flows are classified as investing activities within the Company's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Costs relating to financing of shopping center properties are deferred and amortized over
the life of the related loan using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. In-place lease values are amortized over the remaining lease term
plus an estimate of the renewal term. Leasing commissions and legal costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the individual remaining lease years. The ranges of the terms of the
agreements are as follows:
|
|
|
Deferred lease costs |
|
1 - 15 years |
Deferred financing costs |
|
1 - 15 years |
In-place lease values |
|
Remaining lease term plus an estimate for renewal |
Leasing commissions and legal costs |
|
5 - 10 years |
Results of Operations
Many of the variations in the results of operations, discussed below, occurred because of transactions described above, including the
Acquisition Properties, the Mervyn's Properties and Santa Monica Place (the "Redevelopment Center"). The "Same Centers" include all consolidated Centers, excluding the Mervyn's Properties, the
Acquisition Properties and the Redevelopment Center.
The
increase in revenue and expenses of the Redevelopment Center during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 in comparison to the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 is primarily due to the opening of Santa Monica Place in August 2010.
Unconsolidated
joint ventures are reflected using the equity method of accounting. The Company's pro rata share of the results from these Centers is reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations as equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures.
The
U.S. economy, the retail industry as well as certain of the Company's operating results continued to improve during the first half of 2011. The Company's occupancy rate as of
June 30, 2011 increased compared to June 30, 2010. In addition, the recent trend of retail sales growth continued in this quarter with tenant sales per square foot increasing compared to
the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010. The releasing spreads also increased for the year ended June 30, 2011. While economic data for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 showed certain signs of a positive trend in the
retail industry, the U.S. economy is still experiencing weakness, high levels of unemployment have persisted, and rental rates and valuations for retail space have not fully recovered to
pre-recession levels. Any further continuation of these adverse conditions could harm the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.
The
Company considers tenant annual sales per square foot (for tenants in place for 12 months or longer and under 10,000 square feet), occupancy rates (excluding anchor tenants)
for the Centers and releasing spreads (i.e. a comparison of average base rent per square foot on leases executed during the trailing twelve months to average base rent per square foot on leases
expiring during the year) to be key performance indicators of the Company's internal growth. These calculations exclude Valley View Center, Granite Run Mall and Shoppingtown Mall.
Tenant
sales per square foot increased from $420 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $458 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2011. Occupancy rate
increased from 91.8% at June 30, 2010 compared to 92.3% at June 30, 2011. Releasing spreads increased 11.6% from the twelve months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the twelve
months ended June 30, 2010.
38
Table of Contents
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
Revenues:
Minimum and percentage rents (collectively referred to as "rental revenue") increased by $8.6 million, or 8.2%, from 2010 to
2011. The increase in rental revenue is attributed to an increase of $4.9 million from the Redevelopment Center, $2.7 million from the Acquisition Properties, $0.9 million from
the Mervyn's Properties and $0.1 million from the Same Centers. Rental revenue includes the amortization of above and below-market leases, the amortization of straight-line rents
and lease termination income. The amortization of above and below-market leases decreased from $2.1 million in 2010 to $2.0 million in 2011. The amortization of straight-lined rents
increased from $1.1 million in 2010 to $1.4 million in 2011. Lease termination income increased from $1.1 million in 2010 to $1.9 million in 2011.
Tenant
recoveries increased $3.8 million, or 6.7%, from 2010 to 2011. The increase in tenant recoveries is attributed to an increase of $2.3 million from the Redevelopment
Center, $1.1 million from the Acquisition Properties, $0.3 million from the Same Centers and $0.1 million from the Mervyn's Properties.
Management
Companies revenue decreased from $12.1 million in 2010 to $8.1 million in 2011. The decrease in Management Companies revenue is primarily attributed to a
decrease in development fees.
Shopping Center and Operating Expenses:
Shopping center and operating expenses increased $7.8 million, or 13.8%, from 2010 to 2011. The increase in shopping center and
operating expenses is attributed to an increase of $3.0 million from the Redevelopment Center, $2.3 million from the Acquisition Properties, $1.3 million from the Same Centers and
$1.2 million from the Mervyn's Properties.
Management Companies' Operating Expenses:
Management Companies' operating expenses decreased $3.5 million from 2010 to 2011 due to a decrease in compensation costs in
2011.
REIT General and Administrative Expenses:
REIT general and administrative expenses increased by $0.1 million from 2010 to 2011.
Depreciation and Amortization:
Depreciation and amortization increased $6.1 million from 2010 to 2011. The increase in depreciation and amortization is
primarily attributed to an increase of $3.8 million from the Redevelopment Center, $1.1 million from the Same Centers and $1.1 million from the Acquisition Properties.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased $3.2 million from 2010 to 2011. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributed to a
decrease of $3.3 million from the Same Centers and $1.5 million from borrowings under the Company's line of credit offset in part by an increase of $1.6 million from the
Redevelopment Center. The decrease in interest expense at the Same Centers is primarily attributed to the maturity of a $400.0 million interest rate swap agreement in April 2011.
The
above interest expense items are net of capitalized interest, which decreased from $8.3 million in 2010 to $3.3 million in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in
redevelopment activity.
39
Table of Contents
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $9.4 million from 2010 to 2011. The increase in equity in income of
unconsolidated joint ventures is primarily attributed to the Company's pro rata share in the early extinguishment of debt at its joint venture in SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. (See "Other
Transactions and Events").
Loss on Remeasurement, Sale or Write-down of Assets:
Loss on remeasurement, sale or write down of assets increased $35.0 million from 2010 to 2011. The increase in loss is primarily
attributed to the write-down of the long-lived assets on Shoppingtown Mall of $35.7 million. See "Other Transactions and Events."
Net (loss) income:
Net loss increased $21.0 million from 2010 to 2011. The increase in net loss is primarily attributed to the impairment charge on
Shoppingtown Mall in 2011 of $35.7 million offset in part by an increase in equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures of $9.4 million.
Funds From Operations ("FFO"):
Primarily as a result of the factors mentioned above, FFOdiluted decreased 13.9% from $77.5 million in 2010 to
$66.7 million in 2011. For a reconciliation of FFO and FFOdiluted to net loss attributable to the Company, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, see "Funds from
Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations."
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
Revenues:
Rental revenue increased by $15.8 million, or 7.5%, from 2010 to 2011. The increase in rental revenue is attributed to an
increase of $9.3 million from the Redevelopment Center, $3.8 million from the Acquisition Properties, $1.8 million from the Mervyn's Properties and $0.9 million from the
Same Centers. Rental revenue includes the amortization of above and below-market leases, the amortization of straight-line rents and lease termination income. The amortization of above and
below-market leases increased from $3.9 million in 2010 to $4.1 million in 2011. The amortization of straight-lined rents increased from $1.4 million in 2010 to
$1.6 million in 2011. Lease termination income increased from $1.7 million in 2010 to $3.2 million in 2011.
Tenant
recoveries increased $4.4 million, or 3.8%, from 2010 to 2011. The increase in tenant recoveries is attributed to an increase of $5.0 million from the Redevelopment
Center, $1.5 million from the Acquisition Properties and $0.4 million from the Mervyn's Properties offset in part by a decrease of $2.5 million from the Same Centers. The decrease
in tenant recoveries from the Same Centers is primarily due to a decrease in recoverable expenses.
Management
Companies revenue decreased from $22.3 million in 2010 to $18.7 million in 2011 due to a decrease in development fees.
Shopping Center and Operating Expenses:
Shopping center and operating expenses increased $9.6 million, or 8.2%, from 2010 to 2011. The increase in shopping center and
operating expenses is attributed to an increase of $6.0 million from the Redevelopment Center, $3.4 million from the Acquisition Properties and $1.5 million from the Mervyn's
Properties offset in part by a decrease of $1.3 million from the Same Centers. The decrease
40
Table of Contents
in
shopping center and operating expenses at the Same Centers is primarily due to a decrease in property taxes and bad debt expense.
Management Companies' Operating Expenses:
Management Companies' operating expenses increased $0.1 million from 2010 to 2011.
REIT General and Administrative Expenses:
REIT general and administrative expenses increased by $0.2 million from 2010 to 2011.
Depreciation and Amortization:
Depreciation and amortization increased $11.5 million from 2010 to 2011. The increase in depreciation and amortization is
primarily attributed to an increase of $7.2 million from the Redevelopment Center, $2.9 million from the Same Centers and $1.4 million from the Acquisition Properties.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased $6.6 million from 2010 to 2011. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributed to a
decrease of $10.5 million from borrowings under the Company's line of credit and $0.8 million from borrowings under the Same Centers offset in part by an increase of $4.7 million
from the Redevelopment Center. The decrease in interest expense on the Company's line of credit is primarily due to a decrease in the borrowings and the maturity of a $450.0 million interest
rate swap agreement in April 2010 and the maturity of a $400 million interest rate swap agreement in April 2011.
The
above interest expense items are net of capitalized interest, which decreased from $16.5 million in 2010 to $6.6 million in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in
redevelopment activity.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt:
The loss on early extinguishment of debt of $9.1 million in 2011 is attributed to the prepayment of the mortgage note payable on
Chesterfield Towne Center.
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $23.3 million from 2010 to 2011. The increase in equity in income of
unconsolidated joint ventures is primarily attributed to the Company's $12.5 million pro rata share of the remeasurement gain on the acquisition of an underlying ownership interest in Kierland
Commons in 2011 (See "Acquisitions"), and the Company's $7.8 million pro rata share of the gain on early extinguishment of debt at its joint venture in SDG Macerich Properties, L.P.
(Loss) Gain on Remeasurement, Sale or Write down of Assets:
Loss on remeasurement, sale or write down of assets increased $33.2 million from 2010 to 2011. The increase in loss is primarily
attributed to the write-down of the long-lived assets on Shoppingtown Mall of $35.7 million (See "Other Transactions and Events").
Net Loss:
Net loss increased from $6.8 million in 2010 to $20.8 million in 2011. The increase in net loss is primarily attributed
to the $35.7 million write down of long-lived assets of Shoppingtown Mall and the $9.1 million loss on early extinguishment of debt on Chesterfield Towne Center offset in
part by the $23.3 million increase in equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures.
41
Table of Contents
Funds From Operations:
Primarily as a result of the factors mentioned above, FFOdiluted decreased 5.8% from $149.1 million in 2010 to
$140.4 million in 2011. For a reconciliation of FFO and FFOdiluted to net loss available to common stockholders, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, see "Funds
from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations."
Operating Activities:
Cash provided by operating activities increased from $72.8 million in 2010 to $89.9 million in 2011. The increase was
primarily due to changes in assets and liabilities and the results at the Centers as discussed above.
Investing Activities:
Cash used in investing activities increased from $23.8 million in 2010 to $197.3 million in 2011. The increase was
primarily due to an increase of $134.0 million in contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures, $24.9 million in acquisitions of property, development, redevelopment and property
improvements, $10.2 million in restricted cash and a decrease of $11.8 million in proceeds from notes receivable. The increase in contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures is
primarily attributed to the Kierland Commons, The Shops at Atlas Park, Arrowhead Towne Center and Superstition Springs transactions (See "Acquisitions").
Financing Activities:
Cash used in financing activities increased from a surplus of $454.4 million in 2010 to a deficit of $265.0 million in
2011. The increase in cash used was primarily due to the $1.2 billion stock offering in 2010, a decrease in proceeds from mortgages, bank and other notes payable of $78.1 million and an
increase in dividends and distributions of $63.5 million offset in part in by a decrease in payments on mortgages, bank and other notes payable of $645.0 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company anticipates meeting its liquidity needs for its operating expenses and debt service and dividend requirements through cash
generated from operations, working capital reserves and/or borrowings under its unsecured line of credit. On May 2, 2011, the Company obtained a new $1.5 billion revolving line of
credit, which provides the Company with additional liquidity.
42
Table of Contents
The
following tables summarize capital expenditures incurred at the Centers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Consolidated Centers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of property and equipment |
|
$ |
70,114 |
|
$ |
6,514 |
|
Development, redevelopment, expansion and renovations |
|
|
52,461 |
|
|
96,994 |
|
Tenant allowances |
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
7,034 |
|
Deferred leasing charges |
|
|
16,868 |
|
|
14,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
148,235 |
|
$ |
125,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint Venture Centers (at Company's pro rata share): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of property and equipment |
|
$ |
137,291 |
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
Development, redevelopment, expansion and renovations |
|
|
16,410 |
|
|
17,771 |
|
Tenant allowances |
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
1,503 |
|
Deferred leasing charges |
|
|
2,878 |
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
159,276 |
|
$ |
23,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company expects amounts to be incurred in future years for tenant allowances and deferred leasing charges to be comparable or less than 2010 and that capital for those expenditures
will be available from working capital, cash flow from operations, borrowings on property specific debt or unsecured corporate borrowings. The Company expects to incur between $150 million and
$250 million during the next twelve months for development, redevelopment, expansion and renovations. Capital for these major expenditures, developments and/or redevelopments has been, and is
expected to continue to be, obtained from a combination of equity or debt financings, which include borrowings under the Company's line of credit and construction loans. In addition to the Company's
April 2010 equity offering and property refinancings, the Company has also generated additional liquidity in the past through joint venture transactions and the sale of non-core assets,
and may continue to do so in the future.
The
capital and credit markets can fluctuate, and at times, limit access to debt and equity financing for companies. As demonstrated by the Company's recent activity, including its new
$1.5 billion line of credit and April 2010 equity offering, the Company was able to access capital; however, there is no assurance the Company will be able to do so in future periods or on
similar terms and conditions. Many factors impact the Company's ability to access capital, such as its overall debt level, interest rates, interest coverage ratios and prevailing market conditions. In
the event that the Company has significant tenant defaults as a result of the overall economy and general market conditions, the Company could have a decrease in cash flow from operations, which could
create borrowings under its line of credit. These events could result in an increase in the Company's proportion of floating rate debt, which would cause it to be subject to interest rate fluctuations
in the future.
The
Company's total outstanding loan indebtedness at June 30, 2011 was $6.1 billion (including $757.2 million of unsecured debt and $2.2 billion of its pro
rata share of joint venture debt). The majority of the Company's debt consists of fixed-rate conventional mortgages payable collateralized by individual properties. Approximately
$154.3 million of the outstanding total indebtedness matures in 2011 (at the Company's pro rata share and excluding loans with extensions and refinancing transactions that have recently
closed). The Company expects that all of these maturities during the next twelve months, except the mortgage note payable on Valley View Center and Shoppingtown Mall, will be refinanced, restructured,
extended and/or paid off from the Company's line of credit or cash on hand.
43
Table of Contents
The
Company's Senior Notes bear interest at 3.25%, payable semiannually, mature on March 15, 2012 and are senior to unsecured debt of the Company and are guaranteed by the
Operating Partnership. The carrying value of the Senior Notes at June 30, 2011 was $612.2 million. The Company believes it has various sources of liquidity to pay off the Senior Notes,
including capacity under its line of credit. See Note 11Bank and Other Notes Payable in the Company's Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The
Company had, through the Operating Partnership, a $1.5 billion revolving line of credit that bore interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 0.75% to 1.10% depending on the Company's
overall leverage that matured on April 25, 2011. On May 2, 2011, the Company, through the Operating Partnership, obtained a new $1.5 billion revolving line of credit that bears
interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 1.75% to 3.0% depending on the Company's overall leverage and matures on May 2, 2015 with a one-year extension option. Based on the Company's
current leverage levels, the borrowing rate on the new facility is LIBOR plus 2.0%. The line of credit can be expanded, depending on certain conditions, up to a total facility of $2.0 billion.
All obligations under the line of credit are unconditionally guaranteed by the Company and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries and are secured, subject to certain exceptions, by pledges of
direct and indirect ownership interests in certain of the subsidiary guarantors. At June 30, 2011, total borrowings under the line of credit were $145.0 million with an average effective
interest rate of 2.74%.
Cash
dividends and distributions for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $145.4 million. A total of $89.9 million was funded by cash flows provided by
operations. The remaining $55.5 million was funded through distributions received from unconsolidated joint ventures which are included in the cash flows from investing activities section of
the Company's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
At
June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all applicable loan covenants under its agreements.
At
June 30, 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents available of $73.2 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements:
The Company accounts for its investments in joint ventures that it does not have a controlling interest or is not the primary
beneficiary using the equity method of accounting and those investments are reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company as "Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures."
In
addition, certain joint ventures also have secured debt that could become recourse debt to the Company or its subsidiaries, in excess of the Company's pro rata share, should the joint
ventures be unable to discharge the obligations of the related debt. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the debt that could be recourse to the Company was $372.3 million offset in part by
indemnity agreements from joint venture partners for $178.6 million. The maturities of the recourse debt, net of indemnification, are $171.6 million in 2013, $4.3 million in 2014
and $17.8 million in 2015.
Additionally,
as of June 30, 2011, the Company is contingently liable for $22.4 million in letters of credit guaranteeing performance by the Company of certain obligations
relating to the Centers. The Company does not believe that these letters of credit will result in a liability to the Company.
44
Table of Contents
Long-term Contractual Obligations:
The following is a schedule of long-term contractual obligations as of June 30, 2011 for the consolidated Centers
over the periods in which they are expected to be paid (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total |
|
Less than
1 year |
|
1 - 3
years |
|
3 - 5
years |
|
More than
five years |
|
Long-term debt obligations (includes expected interest payments) |
|
$ |
4,065,575 |
|
$ |
1,897,950 |
|
$ |
690,464 |
|
$ |
1,012,458 |
|
$ |
464,703 |
|
Operating lease obligations(1) |
|
|
813,715 |
|
|
13,396 |
|
|
27,156 |
|
|
23,917 |
|
|
749,246 |
|
Purchase obligations(1) |
|
|
10,016 |
|
|
10,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
242,706 |
|
|
196,821 |
|
|
4,177 |
|
|
4,136 |
|
|
37,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,132,012 |
|
$ |
2,118,183 |
|
$ |
721,797 |
|
$ |
1,040,511 |
|
$ |
1,251,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- See
Note 17Commitments and Contingencies of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Funds From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations
The Company uses FFO and adjusted FFO ("AFFO") in addition to net income to report its operating and financial results and considers
FFO, AFFO and FFO and AFFO-diluted as supplemental measures for the real estate industry and a supplement to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") measures. The National Association of
Real Estate Investment Trusts defines FFO as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from extraordinary items and sales of depreciated operating properties,
plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are
calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. Adjusted FFO ("AFFO") excludes impairments of consolidated assets.
FFO
and FFO on a diluted basis are useful to investors in comparing operating and financial results between periods. This is especially true since FFO excludes real estate depreciation
and amortization, as the Company believes real estate values fluctuate based on market conditions rather than
depreciating in value ratably on a straight-line basis over time. The Company believes that AFFO and AFFO on a diluted basis provide useful supplemental information regarding the Company's
performance as they show a more meaningful and consistent comparison of the Company's operating performance and allow investors to more easily compare the Company's results without taking into account
the unrelated impairment losses, which is a non-routine item. FFO and AFFO on a diluted basis are measures investors find most useful in measuring the dilutive impact of outstanding
convertible securities.
AFFO
and FFO do not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP, should not be considered as an alternative to net income as defined by GAAP and are not indicative of cash
available to fund all cash flow needs. The Company also cautions that AFFO and FFO, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other real estate investment trusts.
The reconciliation of AFFO and FFO and AFFO and FFOdiluted to net income (loss) available to common stockholders is provided below.
Management
compensates for the limitations of AFFO and FFO by providing investors with financial statements prepared according to GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of AFFO and
FFO and a reconciliation of AFFO and FFO and AFFO and FFO-diluted to net income (loss) available to common stockholders. Management believes that to further understand the Company's
performance, AFFO and FFO should be compared with the Company's reported net income (loss) and considered in addition to cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements.
45
Table of Contents
The
following reconciles net income (loss) available to common stockholders to FFO and AFFO (dollars and shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(19,216 |
) |
$ |
(440 |
) |
$ |
(19,182 |
) |
$ |
(6,797 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to FFObasic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership |
|
|
(1,710 |
) |
|
52 |
|
|
(1,707 |
) |
|
(746 |
) |
|
Loss (gain) on remeasurement, sale or write-down of consolidated assets, net(1) |
|
|
34,466 |
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
34,903 |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
Add: gain on undepreciated assetsconsolidated assets(1) |
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
Add: noncontrolling interest share of loss on sale of consolidated joint ventures(1) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(32 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(32 |
) |
|
Less: write-down of consolidated assets(1) |
|
|
(36,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(36,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on remeasurement, sale or write-down of assets from unconsolidated joint ventures(2) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
(428 |
) |
|
(12,560 |
) |
|
(366 |
) |
|
Add: gain on sale of undepreciated assetsfrom unconsolidated joint ventures(2) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
427 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
Less write down of unconsolidated joint ventures(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization on consolidated assets |
|
|
65,833 |
|
|
59,913 |
|
|
130,459 |
|
|
119,128 |
|
|
Less: depreciation and amortization attributable to noncontrolling interest on consolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(4,492 |
) |
|
(6,497 |
) |
|
(8,986 |
) |
|
(11,590 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization on unconsolidated joint ventures(2) |
|
|
30,181 |
|
|
28,753 |
|
|
58,706 |
|
|
56,208 |
|
|
Less: depreciation on personal property |
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
|
(3,772 |
) |
|
(7,382 |
) |
|
(6,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFObasic and diluted |
|
|
66,739 |
|
|
77,466 |
|
|
140,421 |
|
|
149,063 |
|
|
Impairment charge |
|
|
35,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
35,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFObasic and diluted |
|
$ |
102,468 |
|
$ |
77,466 |
|
$ |
176,150 |
|
$ |
149,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of FFO and AFFO shares outstanding for AFFO and FFObasic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO and AFFObasic and diluted(3) |
|
|
143,140 |
|
|
135,495 |
|
|
142,810 |
|
|
122,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- The
net total of these line items equal the loss (gain) on sales of depreciated assets. These line items are included in this reconciliation to provide the
Company's investors with more detailed information and do not represent a departure from FFO as defined by NAREIT.
- (2)
- Unconsolidated
assets are presented at the Company's pro rata share.
- (3)
- As
of June 30, 2011 and 2010, 11.1 million and 12.0 million OP Units were outstanding, respectively.
The
computation of FFOdiluted shares outstanding includes the effect of share and unit-based compensation plans and the Senior Notes using the treasury stock method. It also
assumes the conversion of MACWH, LP common and preferred units to the extent that they are dilutive to the FFO computation. The MACWH, LP preferred units were antidilutive to the
calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and were not included in the above calculations.
46
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company's primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The Company has managed and will continue to manage interest rate
risk by (1) maintaining a ratio of fixed rate, long-term debt to total debt such that floating rate exposure is kept at an acceptable level, (2) reducing interest rate
exposure on certain long-term floating rate debt through the use of interest rate caps and/or swaps with appropriately matching maturities, (3) using
treasury rate locks where appropriate to fix rates on anticipated debt transactions, and (4) taking advantage of favorable market conditions for long-term debt and/or equity.
The
following table sets forth information as of June 30, 2011 concerning the Company's long term debt obligations, including principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted
average interest rates and estimated fair value ("FV") (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
FV |
|
CONSOLIDATED CENTERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
984,307 |
|
$ |
343,184 |
|
$ |
70,577 |
|
$ |
193,120 |
|
$ |
528,602 |
|
$ |
443,281 |
|
$ |
2,563,071 |
|
$ |
2,681,042 |
|
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
5.45 |
% |
|
5.69 |
% |
|
5.86 |
% |
|
6.09 |
% |
|
4.83 |
% |
|
5.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Floating rate |
|
|
835,387 |
|
|
120,821 |
|
|
120,643 |
|
|
132,316 |
|
|
107,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,316,167 |
|
|
1,313,552 |
|
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
2.65 |
% |
|
6.52 |
% |
|
3.84 |
% |
|
3.48 |
% |
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debtConsolidated Centers |
|
$ |
1,819,694 |
|
$ |
464,005 |
|
$ |
191,220 |
|
$ |
325,436 |
|
$ |
635,602 |
|
$ |
443,281 |
|
$ |
3,879,238 |
|
$ |
3,994,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE CENTERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt (at Company's pro rata share): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
275,989 |
|
$ |
212,664 |
|
$ |
502,131 |
|
$ |
164,390 |
|
$ |
673,919 |
|
$ |
99,567 |
|
$ |
1,928,660 |
|
$ |
2,077,135 |
|
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
6.89 |
% |
|
6.94 |
% |
|
5.48 |
% |
|
5.96 |
% |
|
6.09 |
% |
|
5.83 |
% |
|
6.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Floating rate |
|
|
147,117 |
|
|
58,849 |
|
|
18,976 |
|
|
13,306 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
263,248 |
|
|
263,406 |
|
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
0.99 |
% |
|
5.04 |
% |
|
3.11 |
% |
|
3.15 |
% |
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
2.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debtUnconsolidated Joint Venture Centers |
|
$ |
423,106 |
|
$ |
271,513 |
|
$ |
521,107 |
|
$ |
177,696 |
|
$ |
698,919 |
|
$ |
99,567 |
|
$ |
2,191,908 |
|
$ |
2,340,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated Centers' total fixed rate debt at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $2.6 billion and
$3.1 billion, respectively. The average interest rate on fixed rate debt at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 5.61% and 5.98%, respectively. The consolidated Centers' total
floating rate debt at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $1.3 billion and $766.9 million, respectively. The average interest rate on floating rate debt at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 3.23% and 3.85%, respectively.
The
Company's pro rata share of the Unconsolidated Joint Venture Centers' fixed rate debt at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $1.9 billion and
$2.0 billion, respectively. The average interest rate on fixed rate debt at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 6.12% and 6.11%, respectively. The Company's pro rata share of
the Unconsolidated Joint Venture Centers' floating rate debt at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $263.2 million and $241.7 million, respectively. The average
interest rate on the floating rate debt at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 2.39% and 2.24%, respectively.
The
Company uses derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage or hedge interest rate risk and records all derivatives on its consolidated balance sheets at
fair value (See Note 5Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities in the Company's Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
47
Table of Contents
The
following are outstanding derivatives at June 30, 2011 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property/Entity(1)
|
|
Notional
Amount |
|
Product(2) |
|
Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
Company's
Ownership |
|
Fair
Value(1) |
|
La Cumbre Plaza |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
Cap |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
12/9/2011 |
|
|
100 |
% |
$ |
|
|
Paradise Valley Mall |
|
|
85,000 |
|
Cap |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
9/12/2011 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
Superstition Springs Center |
|
|
67,500 |
|
Cap |
|
|
8.63 |
% |
|
9/9/2011 |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
|
The Oaks(3) |
|
|
150,000 |
|
Cap |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
7/1/2011 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
Westside Pavilion |
|
|
175,000 |
|
Cap |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
6/5/2012 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
- (1)
- Fair
value at the Company's ownership percentage.
- (2)
- Interest
rate cap agreements ("Cap") offer protection against floating rates on the notional amount from exceeding the rates noted in the above schedule.
- (3)
- The
Cap was not renewed following its maturity. The Company does not expect the maturity of the Cap to have a material impact on the Company's interest rate
risk.
In
addition, the Company has assessed the market risk for its floating rate debt and believes that a 1% increase in interest rates would decrease future earnings and cash flows by
approximately $15.8 million per year based on $1.6 billion outstanding of floating rate debt at June 30, 2011.
The
fair value of the Company's long-term debt is estimated based on discounted cash flows at interest rates that management believes reflect the risks associated with
long-term debt of similar risk and duration.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, management carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on their evaluation as of June 30, 2011, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (a) recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and (b) is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In
addition, there has been no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
48
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the Management Companies or their respective affiliates are currently involved in any
material legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors relating to the Company set forth under the caption "Item 1A. Risk
Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not Applicable
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
Not Applicable
49
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11, as amended (No. 33-68964)). |
|
3.1.1 |
|
Articles Supplementary of the Company (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date May 30, 1995). |
|
3.1.2 |
|
Articles Supplementary of the Company (with respect to the first paragraph) (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's 1998 Form 10-K). |
|
3.1.3 |
|
Articles Supplementary of the Company (Series D Preferred Stock) (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date July 26, 2002). |
|
3.1.4 |
|
Articles Supplementary of the Company (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, as amended (No. 333-88718)). |
|
3.1.5 |
|
Articles of Amendment (declassification of Board) (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's 2008 Form 10-K). |
|
3.1.6 |
|
Articles Supplementary (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date February 5, 2009). |
|
3.1.7 |
|
Articles of Amendment (increased authorized shares) (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009). |
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date June 30, 2010). |
|
4.1 |
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, as amended, event date November 10, 1998). |
|
4.2 |
|
Form of Preferred Stock Certificate (Series D Preferred Stock) (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-107063)). |
|
4.3 |
|
Indenture, dated as of March 16, 2007, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (includes form of the Notes and Guarantee) (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date March 16, 2007). |
|
4.4 |
|
Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated as of September 30, 2009, between the Company and Heitman M-rich Investors LLC (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's 2009
Form 10-K). |
|
10.1 |
* |
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (May 1, 2011). |
|
10.2 |
* |
Amendment No. 2 to 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (May 1, 2011). |
|
10.3 |
* |
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Executives (May 1, 2011). |
|
10.4 |
* |
Amendment No. 2 to 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Executives (May 1, 2011). |
50
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.5 |
|
$1,500,000,000 Revolving Loan Facility Credit Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2011, by and among the Operating Partnership, the Company and the other guarantors party thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
administrative agent and as collateral agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunning managers; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and various lenders party
thereto (includes the form of pledge and security agreement) (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date May 2, 2011). |
|
10.6 |
|
Unconditional Guaranty, dated as of May 2, 2011, by and between the Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K, event date May 2, 2011). |
|
10.7 |
|
Unconditional Guaranty, dated as of May 2, 2011, by and among the Guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K, event date May 2, 2011). |
|
31.1 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Arthur Coppola, Chief Executive Officer |
|
31.2 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Thomas O'Hern, Chief Financial Officer |
|
32.1 |
|
Section 906 Certifications of Arthur Coppola and Thomas O'Hern |
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
- *
- Represents
a management contract, or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Regulation S-K.
51
Table of Contents
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE MACERICH COMPANY |
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ THOMAS E. O'HERN
Thomas E. O'Hern Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Date:
August 5, 2011
52