MANHATTAN BRIDGE CAPITAL, INC - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
quarterly period ended June
30,
2010
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the
transition period from ___________________________________ to
_____________________________________
Commission
File Number: 000-25991
MANHATTAN BRIDGE
CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New York
|
11-3474831
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
192 Lexington Avenue, New
York, New York 10016
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(212)
489-6800
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. x
Yes ¨
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Accelerated
filer
|
¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
¨ (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
As of
August 3, 2010, the Issuer had a total of 3,324,459 shares of Common Stock,
$.001 par value, outstanding.
MANHATTAN BRIDGE CAPITAL,
INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Page
Number
|
||
Part
I
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June
30, 2010 and 2009
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2010 and
2009
|
4
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
10
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
14
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
14
|
Part
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
14
|
SIGNATURES
|
15
|
|
EXHIBITS
|
E-1
|
(i)
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1
MANHATTAN
BRIDGE CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
June 30, 2010
|
December 31,2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 278,415 | $ | 707,449 | ||||
Investment
in marketable securities
|
— | 404,268 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents and investment in marketable
securities
|
278,415 | 1,111,717 | ||||||
Short
term loans
|
7,706,700 | 6,476,621 | ||||||
Interest
receivable on short term loans
|
69,072 | 60,207 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
111,719 | 26,568 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
8,165,906 | 7,675,113 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
3,942 | 5,458 | ||||||
Security
deposit
|
17,515 | 17,515 | ||||||
Investment
in privately held company, at cost
|
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 8,287,363 | $ | 7,798,086 | ||||
Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Lines
of credit
|
$ | 300,000 | $ | — | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
40,919 | 77,768 | ||||||
Deferred
origination fees
|
56,892 | 102,751 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
188,742 | 162,182 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
586,553 | 342,701 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies Shareholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
shares - $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares
issued
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
shares - $.001 par value; 25,000,000 authorized; 3,405,190 issued and 3,324,459
outstanding
|
3,405 | 3,405 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
9,550,477 | 9,476,762 | ||||||
Treasury
stock, at cost- 80,731 shares
|
(241,400 | ) | (241,400 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
— | 123,823 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(1,611,672 | ) | (1,907,205 | ) | ||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
7,700,810 | 7,455,385 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ | 8,287,363 | $ | 7,798,086 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
2
MANHATTAN
BRIDGE CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
income from short term loans
|
$ | 259,661 | $ | 203,917 | $ | 495,864 | $ | 397,615 | ||||||||
Origination
fees
|
55,368 | 45,666 | 110,339 | 83,945 | ||||||||||||
Total
Revenue
|
315,029 | 249,583 | 606,203 | 481,560 | ||||||||||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense on lines of credit used
|
9,593 | — | 14,727 | — | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
182,451 | 171,840 | 324,527 | 305,103 | ||||||||||||
Total
operating costs and expenses
|
192,044 | 171,840 | 339,254 | 305,103 | ||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
122,985 | 77,743 | 266,947 | 176,457 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
824 | 6,614 | 4,167 | 15,838 | ||||||||||||
Realized
loss on marketable securities
|
— | (5,940 | ) | — | (5,940 | ) | ||||||||||
Realized
gain on marketable securities that were previously marked
down
|
96,132 | 18,658 | 151,419 | 18,658 | ||||||||||||
Total
other income
|
96,956 | 19,332 | 155,586 | 28,556 | ||||||||||||
Income
from operations before income tax expense
|
219,941 | 97,075 | 422,533 | 205,013 | ||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
(65,000 | ) | (37,074 | ) | (127,000 | ) | (59,403 | ) | ||||||||
Net
Income
|
$ | 154,941 | $ | 60,001 | $ | 295,533 | $ | 145,610 | ||||||||
Basic
and diluted net income per common share outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
—Basic
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||||
—Diluted
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
—Basic
|
3,324,459 | 3,325,760 | 3,324,459 | 3,325,760 | ||||||||||||
—Diluted
|
3,370,329 | 3,328,942 | 3,368,096 | 3,325,980 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
MANHATTAN
BRIDGE CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
Income
|
$ | 295,533 | $ | 145,610 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
-
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
1,516 | 2,445 | ||||||
Non
cash compensation expense
|
45,754 | 45,659 | ||||||
Realized
loss on sale of marketable securities
|
— | 5,940 | ||||||
Realized
gain on sale of marketable securities that were previously marked
down
|
(151,419 | ) | (18,658 | ) | ||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Interest
receivable on short term loans
|
(8,865 | ) | (12,022 | ) | ||||
Other
current and non current assets
|
(85,151 | ) | (27,846 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(8,888 | ) | (36,316 | ) | ||||
Deferred
origination fees
|
(45,859 | ) | 44,859 | |||||
Income
tax payable
|
26,560 | 51,078 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
69,181 | 200,749 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of marketable securities, auction rate securities and annuity
contract
|
431,864 | 187,834 | ||||||
Issuance
of short term and long term loans
|
(2,936,500 | ) | (4,058,604 | ) | ||||
Collection
received from short term loans
|
1,706,421 | 2,724,487 | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(798,215 | ) | (1,146,283 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Use
of lines of credit
|
300,000 | 158,028 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
300,000 | 158,028 | ||||||
Net
decrease in cash
|
(429,034 | ) | (787,506 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of the year
|
707,449 | 884,296 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 278,415 | $ | 96,790 | ||||
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information:
|
||||||||
Interest
paid during the period
|
$ | 14,727 | $ | 72 | ||||
Taxes
paid during the period
|
$ | 100,440 | $ | 8,325 | ||||
Non-cash
investing
and financing activities
|
||||||||
Forgiveness
of debt
|
$ | 27,961 | $ | — |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
4
MANHATTAN
BRIDGE CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2010
1.
|
THE
COMPANY
|
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Manhattan Bridge
Capital, Inc., a New York corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries DAG
Funding Solutions, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary and a New York corporation,
and DAG Interactive, Inc. (“DAG Interactive”), a 80% owned subsidiary and a
Delaware corporation (collectively referred to herein as “Manhattan Bridge
Capital” “we”, “us” “our” or “the Company”) have been prepared by the
Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information and with instructions to Form
10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. The accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2009 and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Form
10-K. Results of consolidated operations for the interim period are
not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be attained in the entire
fiscal year. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.
The
Company provides short term, secured, non–banking commercial loans, to small
businesses.
The
Company recognizes revenues in accordance with ASC 605, which provides guidance
on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial
statements. ASC 605 outlines the basic criteria that must be met to recognize
revenue and provides guidance for disclosure related to revenue recognition
policies. In general, the Company recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery of the product has occurred or
services have been rendered, (iii) the sales price charged is fixed or
determinable, and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Interest
income from short term commercial loans is recognized, as earned, over the loan
period.
Origination
fee revenue on short term commercial loans is amortized over the term of the
respective note.
Marketable
securities are reported at fair value and are classified as available-for-sale.
Unrealized gains and losses from those securities are reported as a separate
component of shareholders’ equity, net of the related tax effect. Realized gains
and losses are determined on a specific identification basis. Additionally,
the Company
assesses whether an other-than-temporary impairment loss on the investments has
occurred due to declines in fair value or other market conditions. Declines in
fair value that are considered other than temporary, if any, are recorded as
charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company did not record
an impairment loss on marketable securities for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
5
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements,
which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an
asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 establishes a
three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure
fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs
used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1—Quoted
prices in active markets.
Level 2—Observable
inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or
indirectly observable.
Level 3—Unobservable
inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity
to develop its own assumptions.
Cash
equivalents and investment instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s Level 1
investments are valued using quoted market prices in active markets. The Company’s Level 2
investments are valued using broker or dealer quotations for similar assets and
liabilities. As of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the Company’s Level 1 investments consisted
of cash, money market accounts and marketable securities in the amount of
approximately $278,000 and $1,112,000, respectively, and were recorded as cash
and cash equivalents and marketable securities in the Company’s consolidated
balance sheets.
We have
evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements through August 3, 2010, the day the
financial statements were issued.
2.
|
RECENT
TECHNICAL ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
In June
2009, the FASB issued “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” under ASC 105. ASC 105 establishes
the FASB Standards Accounting Codification as the source of authoritative
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be
applied to nongovernmental entities and rules and interpretive releases of the
SEC as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all
the existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards upon its effective date
and subsequently, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of
Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. The
adoption of this new standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s
disclosures of the consolidated financial statements.
In
August 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 820. This Accounting
Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-5, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
(“ASU 2009-5”) amends the provisions in ASC 820 related to the fair value
measurement of liabilities and clarifies for circumstances in which a quoted
price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. ASU
2009-5 is intended to reduce potential ambiguity in financial reporting when
measuring the fair value of liabilities. ASU 2009-5 is effective for the
Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. ASU 2009-5 concerns disclosure
only. The adoption of ASU 2009-5 did not have a material effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
6
In
December 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-17,
which codifies SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R) issued in June 2009. ASU 2009-17 requires a qualitative approach
to identifying a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity
(“VIE”), and requires ongoing assessment of whether an entity is a VIE and
whether an interest in a VIE makes the holder the primary beneficiary of the
VIE. ASU 2009-17 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
November 15, 2009. The Company believes that the adoption of ASU 2009-17
will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-6, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value
Measurements, which requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about
recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant
transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and
information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in
the reconciliation of Level 3 fair- value measurements. ASU 2010-6 is effective
for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level
3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2010. The Company believes that the adoption of ASU 2010-6
will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial
statements.
Management
does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effected,
accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3.
|
SHORT
TERM COMMERCIAL LOANS
|
At June
30, 2010, we were committed to an additional $982,000 in construction loans that
can be drawn by the borrower when certain conditions are met.
At June
30, 2010, approximately $900,000 of the loans outstanding are due from three
different entities that are all owned by the same individual, which represents
more than 10% of the total balance of the loans outstanding.
In
addition at June 30, 2010, the Company had made loans to four borrowers in the
aggregate amount of $1,342,500. One individual holds a fifty percent interest in
each of the borrowers. The individual has no relationship to any of the officers
or directors of the Company.
4.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
|
Basic and
diluted earnings per share are calculated in accordance with ASC 260 “Earnings
Per Share”. Under ASC 260, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing
income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share
is similar to basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased
to include the potential dilution from the exercise of stock options and
warrants for common shares using the treasury stock method. The numerator in
calculating both basic and diluted earnings per common share for each period is
the reported net income.
7
The
denominator is based on the following weighted average number of common
shares:
Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
3,324,459 | 3,325,760 | 3,324,459 | 3,325,760 | ||||||||||||
Incremental
shares for assumed conversion of options
|
45,870 | 3,182 | 43,637 | 220 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
3,370,329 | 3,328,942 | 3,368,096 | 3,325,980 |
For the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 584,797, and 587,030, stock
options were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation,
respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
For the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, 594,147 and
597,109, stock options were not included in the diluted earnings per
share calculation, respectively, as their effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
5.
|
STOCK
– BASED COMPENSATION
|
The
Company measures and recognizes compensation awards for all stock option grants
made to employees and directors, based on their fair value in accordance with
ASC 718 “Compensation- Stock Compensation”, which establishes standards for the
accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments
for goods or services. A key provision of this statement is to measure the cost
of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments
(including stock options) based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The
cost will be recognized over the service period during which an employee is
required to provide service in exchange for the award (i.e., the requisite
service period or vesting period). The Company accounts for equity instruments
issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 and ASC
505-50, “Equity Based Payment to Non-Employees”. All transactions with
non-employees, in which goods or services are the consideration received for the
issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the
consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued,
whichever is more appropriately measurable.
Share
based compensation expense recognized under ASC 718 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 were $36,147 and $45,755, respectively. Share based
compensation expense recognized under ASC 718 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 were $30,676 and $45,659, respectively.
The
exercise price of options granted under our stock option plan may not be less
than the fair market value on the date of grant. The options may vest
over a period not to exceed ten years. Stock options under our stock
option plan may be awarded to officers, key-employees, consultants and
non-employee directors of the Company. Under our stock option plan,
every non-employee director of the Company is granted 7,000 options upon first
taking office, and then 7,000 upon each additional year in office. The
objectives of our stock option plan include attracting and retaining key
personnel, providing for additional performance incentives and promoting the
success of the Company by increasing the efforts of such officers, employees,
consultants and directors. Our stock option plan is the only plan
that the Company has adopted with stock options available for
grant.
8
The fair
value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average share assumptions used
for grants in 2010 and 2009, respectively: (1) expected life of 5 years; (2) no
annual dividend yield; (3) expected volatility 62% to 73%; and (4) risk free
interest rate of 1.5% to 2.7%.
The
following summarizes stock option activity for the six month period ended June
30, 2010:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in
years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2009
|
699,000 | $ | 1.87 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
98,000 | 1.40 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(70,000 | ) | 4.47 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2010
|
727,000 | $ | 1.56 | 2.40 | $ | 599,283 | ||||||||||
Vested
and exercisable at June 30, 2010
|
630,667 | $ | 1.63 | 2.13 | $ | 545,586 |
The
weighted-average fair value of each option granted during the three month
periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, estimated as of the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model, was $0.78 per option and $0.37 per option,
respectively
6. LINES
OF CREDIT
The
Company established a line of credit with Smith Barney. The line of credit
provides for maximum borrowings in the amount of up to 50% of the value of the
Company's marketable securities held by Smith Barney. This line bears
interest at the prime rate minus .75%. During the first quarter of 2010 the
Company used $158,434 from its line, which was paid during the second quarter of
2010. During the six month period ended June 30, 2009 the Company used $158,028
from its line, which amount remains outstanding as of June 30,
2009.
In
addition, in September 2009, the Company established a line of credit with
Valley National Bank. The line of credit provides for maximum borrowings in the
amount of up to $300,000 and bears fixed interest at the rate of 9%. As of June
30, 2010, $300,000 is outstanding under this line.
7. FORGIVENESS
OF DEBT
On June
21, 2010 the board of directors of the Company decided to dissolve DAG
Interactive. In connection with such dissolution, the Company
recorded forgiveness of debt in the amount of $27,961, for accounts payable due
to a related party, as an increase in equity on its balance
sheet.
9
Item
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and
analysis of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The discussion and analysis contains
forward-looking statements based on current expectations that involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results and the timing of certain events may
differ significantly from those projected in such forward-looking
statements.
We offer
short-term secured commercial loans to small businesses. Loans are
secured by collateral such as real estate, receivables, and marketable
securities and, generally, accompanied by personal guarantees from the
principals of the businesses. The loans are generally for a term of one year.
Most of the loans provide for receipt of interest only during the term of the
loan and a balloon payment at the end of the term. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 the total amounts of $2,936,500 and $4,058,604, respectively
have been lent, offset by collections received from borrowers, under the short
term commercial loans in the amount of $1,706,421 and $2,724,487, respectively.
Loans ranging in size from $50,000 to $1,020,000 were concluded at stated
interest rates of 12% to 16%, but often at higher effective rates based upon
points or other up-front fees. We use our own employees, outside
lawyers and other independent professionals to verify titles and ownership, to
file liens and to consummate the transactions. Outside
appraisers are also employed to assist us in evaluating the worth of
collateral.
To date,
we have not experienced any defaults and none of the loans previously made have
been non-collectable, although no assurances can be given that existing or
future loans may not go into default or prove to be non-collectable in the
future.
At June
30, 2010, we were committed to an additional $982,000 in construction
loans that can be drawn by the borrower when certain conditions are
met.
On June
21, 2010 the board of directors of the Company decided to dissolve DAG
Interactive. In connection with such dissolution, the Company
recorded forgiveness of debt in the amount of $27,961, for accounts payable due
to a related party, as an increase in equity on its balance sheet.
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2009
Revenue
Total
revenues for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 were approximately
$315,000 compared to approximately $250,000 for the three month period ended
June 30, 2009, an increase of $65,000 or 26 %. The increase in revenue
represents an increase in lending operations. For the three month period ended
June 30, 2010, $260,000 of our revenues represent interest income on the short
term secured commercial loans that we offer to small businesses compared to
$204,000 for the same period in 2009, and $55,000 represents origination fees on
such loans compared to $46,000 for the same period in 2009. Loans are secured by
collateral such as real estate, receivables, and marketable securities and
generally are accompanied by personal guarantees from the principals of the
businesses.
10
Interest
expense on lines of credit used
Interest
expense on lines of credit used for the three month period ended June 30, 2010
was $10,000 compared to $0 for the three month period ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in interest expense is due to use of the two lines of credit we
established (See note 6) in order to increase our ability to make
loans.
General
and administrative costs
General
and administrative expenses for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 were
approximately $182,000 compared to approximately $172,000 for the three month
period ended June 30, 2009. This increase is primarily attributable to an
increase in payroll expense of approximately $12,000.
Other
income
For the
three month period ended June 30, 2010 we had other income in the amount of
approximately $97,000, consisting mainly of the realized gain on the sale of
marketable securities that were previously marked down in the amount of $96,000,
compared to other income of approximately $19,000 for the three month period
ended June 30, 2009 consisting mainly of dividend and interest income of
approximately $7,000, a realized gain on the sale of marketable securities that
were previously marked down of approximately $19,000, offset by realized losses
on the sale of marketable securities in the amount of approximately
$6,000.
Income
tax expense
For the
three month period ended June 30, 2010 we had income tax expense of
approximately $65,000 compared to approximately $37,000 for the three month
period ended June 30, 2009.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2009
Revenue
Total
revenues for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 were approximately
$606,000 compared to approximately $482,000 for the six month period ended June
30, 2009, an increase of $124,000, or 25.7%. The increase in revenue represents
an increase in lending operations. Revenue of approximately $496,000 for the six
month period ended June 30, 2010, compared to approximately $398,000 for the six
month period ended June 30, 2009, represents interest income on the short term
secured commercial loans that the Company offers to small businesses, and
$110,000 represents origination fees on such loans compared to $84,000 for the
same period in 2009. Loans are secured by collateral such as real estate,
receivables, and marketable securities and generally are accompanied by personal
guarantees from the principals of the businesses.
Interest
expense on lines of credit used
Interest
expense on lines of credit used for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was
approximately $15,000 compared to $0 for the six month period ended June 30,
2009. The increase in interest expense is due to use of the two lines of credit
we established (See note 6) in order to increase our ability to make
loans.
11
General
and administrative costs
General
and administrative expenses for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 were
approximately $325,000 compared to approximately $305,000 for the six month
period ended June 30, 2009. This increase is primarily attributable to an
increase in payroll expense of approximately $23,000.
Other
income
For the
six month period ended June 30, 2010 we had other income in the amount of
approximately $156,000, consisting mainly of the realized gain on the sale of
marketable securities that were previously marked down of $151,000 and dividend
and interest income of approximately $4,000, compared to other income of
approximately $29,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 consisting
mainly of dividend and interest income of approximately $16,000, a realized gain
on the sale of marketable securities that were previously marked down of
approximately $19,000, offset by realized losses on the sale of marketable
securities in the amount of approximately $6,000.
Income
tax expense
For the
six month period ended June 30, 2010 we had income tax expense of approximately
$127,000 compared to approximately $59,000 for the six month period ended June
30, 2009.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At June
30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $278,000 and working
capital of approximately $7,579,000 as compared to cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities of approximately $1,112,000 and working capital of
$7,332,000 at December 31, 2009. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities primarily reflects the making of short term commercial
loans in the total amount of $2,936,500, offset by proceeds of collection of
these loans in the amount of $1,706,421 and the use of lines of credit in the
amount of $300,000. The increase in working capital is primarily attributable to
the net income of $295,533.
For the
six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, net cash provided by operating
activities were approximately $69,000 and $201,000, respectively. The decrease
in net cash provided by operating activities primarily results from increase in
realized gain on marketable securities that were previously marked down, a
decrease in deferred origination fees and an increase in other current assets,
offset by an increase in net income.
Net cash
used in investing activities was approximately $798,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to approximately $1,146,000 for the same period ended
June 30, 2009. Net cash used in investing activities for the six month periods
ended June 30, 2010 consisted primarily of short term commercial loans made in
the amount of $2,936,500, offset by collection of these loans in the amount of
$1,706,421 and the proceeds from the sale of marketable securities in the amount
of approximately $432,000. In the period ended June 30, 2009 net cash used in
investing activities consisted primarily of the issuance of the Company’s short
term commercial loans in the amount of $4,059,000, offset by collection of these
loans in the amount of $2,724,000 and the proceeds from the sale of marketable
securities in the amount of approximately $188,000.
Net cash
provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was
approximately $300,000 as compared to $158,000 for the period ended June 30,
2009. This increase in net cash provided by financing activities reflects the
use of the Company’s credit lines.
12
We have
not entered into any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or other
relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons that are likely to
affect liquidity or the availability of our requirements for capital
resources.
We
anticipate that our current cash balances will be sufficient to fund our
operations for the next 12 months. However, we expect our working
capital requirements to increase over the next 12 months as we continue to
strive for growth.
Changes
to Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
critical accounting polices and estimates are set forth in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Forward
Looking Statements
This
report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”). Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the
words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate” and similar
expressions. Those statements appear in a number of places in this
report and include statements regarding our intent, belief or current
expectations or those of our directors or officers with respect to, among other
things, trends affecting our financial condition and results of operations and
our business and growth strategies. These forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those
projected, expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements as a result of
various factors (such factors are referred to herein as “Cautionary
Statements”), including but not limited to the following: (i) the
successful integration of new businesses that we may acquire; (ii) the success
of new operations which we have commenced and of our new business strategy;
(iii) our limited operating history in our new business; (iv) potential
fluctuations in our quarterly operating results; and (v) challenges facing us
relating to our growth. The accompanying information contained in
this report, including the information set forth under “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, identifies
important factors that could cause such differences. These
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and we
caution potential investors not to place undue reliance on such
statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements. All subsequent written or oral
forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf
are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary
Statements.
13
Item
3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
As a
smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information
required by this Item.
Item 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
(a)
|
Evaluation
and Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
|
Our
management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act)
as of June 30, 2010. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, our
disclosure controls and procedures were (1) effective in that they were designed
to ensure that material information relating to us is made known to our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer by others within our organization,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures, and (2)
effective in that they ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms.
|
(b)
|
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II-OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
31.1
|
Chief
Executive Officer Certification as required under section 302 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act (filed herewith)
|
|
31.2
|
Chief
Financial Officer Certification as required under section 302 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act (filed herewith)
|
|
32.1*
|
Chief
Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (furnished
herewith)
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (furnished
herewith)
|
*
Furnished, not filed, in accordance with item 601(32)(ii) of Regulation
S-K.
14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
Manhattan
Bridge Capital, Inc. (Registrant)
|
||
Date: August
3, 2010
|
By: /s/ Assaf
Ran
|
|
Assaf
Ran, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
Date: August
3, 2010
|
By: /s/ Inbar Evron-Yogev
|
|
Inbar
Evron-Yogev, Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
15