MARCUS CORP - Quarter Report: 2017 March (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 30, 2017

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 1-12604

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (414) 905-1000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One).

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING AT may 5, 2017 – 19,073,872

CLASS B COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING AT May 5, 2017 – 8,696,301

THE MARCUS CORPORATION

INDEX

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

THE MARCUS CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

THE MARCUS CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

THE MARCUS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

THE MARCUS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

THE MARCUS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

THE MARCUS CORPORATION

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE 13 WEEKS ENDED MARCH 30, 2017

1. General

Accounting Policies – Refer to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements (including footnotes) for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2016, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year, for a description of the Company’s accounting policies.

Basis of Presentation – The unaudited consolidated financial statements for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017 and March 31, 2016 have been prepared by the Company. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the unaudited interim financial information at March 30, 2017, and for all periods presented, have been made. The results of operations during the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year or other interim periods. However, the unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2016.

Depreciation and Amortization – Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are provided using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or any related lease terms. Depreciation expense totaled $12,172,000 and $10,191,000 for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss – Accumulated other comprehensive loss presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the following, all presented net of tax:

⁽¹⁾ Amount is included in interest expense in the consolidated statement of earnings.

Earnings Per Share – Net earnings per share (EPS) of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock is computed using the two class method. Basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for the effect of dilutive stock options using the treasury method. Convertible Class B Common Stock is reflected on an if-converted basis. The computation of the diluted net earnings per share of Common Stock assumes the conversion of Class B Common Stock, while the diluted net earnings per share of Class B Common Stock does not assume the conversion of those shares.

Holders of Common Stock are entitled to cash dividends per share equal to 110% of all dividends declared and paid on each share of Class B Common Stock. As such, the undistributed earnings for each period are allocated based on the proportionate share of entitled cash dividends. The computation of diluted net earnings per share of Common Stock assumes the conversion of Class B Common Stock and, as such, the undistributed earnings are equal to net earnings for that computation.

The following table illustrates the computation of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock basic and diluted net earnings per share for net earnings and provides a reconciliation of the number of weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding:

Equity – Activity impacting total shareholders’ equity attributable to The Marcus Corporation and noncontrolling interests for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was as follows:

Fair Value Measurements – Certain financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value in the consolidated financial statements. Some are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis. Financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis are those that are adjusted to fair value each time a financial statement is prepared. Financial assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis are those that are adjusted to fair value when a significant event occurs. A fair value measurement assumes that a transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.

The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in one of the following categories:

Level 1 – Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments as of the reporting date. At March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016, respectively, the Company’s $70,000 and $93,000 of available for sale securities were valued using Level 1 pricing inputs and were included in other current assets. At March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016, respectively, the Company’s $1,980,000 and $1,927,000 of trading securities were valued using Level 1 pricing inputs and were included in other current assets.

Level 2 – Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on pricing inputs that were either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. At March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016, respectively, the $46,000 and $6,000 asset related to the Company’s interest rate swap contract was valued using Level 2 pricing inputs.

Level 3 – Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates. At March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016, none of the Company’s fair value measurements were valued using Level 3 pricing inputs.

Defined Benefit Plan – The components of the net periodic pension cost of the Company’s unfunded nonqualified, defined-benefit plan are as follows:

New Accounting Pronouncements - In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of Effective Date (ASU 2015-14), to defer the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The guidance may be adopted using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. The Company has performed a review of the requirements of the new revenue standard and related ASUs and is monitoring the activity of the FASB as it relates to specific interpretive guidance. The Company is reviewing customer contracts and is in the process of applying the five-step model of the new revenue standard to each of its key identified revenue streams and is comparing the results to its current accounting practices. While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of adopting this new revenue standard, it currently believes the new standard will not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements of financial instruments. The new standard is effective for the Company in fiscal 2018, with early adoption permitted for certain provisions of the statement. Entities must apply the standard, with certain exceptions, using a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), intended to improve financial reporting related to leasing transactions. ASU No. 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet assets and liabilities for rights and obligations created by leased assets with lease terms of more than 12 months. The new guidance will also require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from the leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. The new standard is effective for the Company in fiscal 2019 and early application is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)— Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The new standard is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard must be applied using a retrospective transition method for each period presented. The Company is evaluating the effect that the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)— Restricted Cash. ASU No. 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As such, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and ending of period total amount shown on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for the Company in fiscal 2018 and must be applied on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company reported a $1,274,000 and $2,073,000 investing cash inflow, respectively, related to a change in restricted cash for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017 and March 31, 2016. Subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-18, the change in restricted cash would be excluded from the change in cash flows from investing activities and included in the change in total cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents as reported in the statement of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805)—Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance and providing a more robust framework to assist reporting organizations with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The new standard is effective for the Company in fiscal 2018 and must be applied prospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect the new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)— Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test that had required a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Rather, entities should apply the same impairment assessment to all reporting units and recognize an impairment loss for the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, without exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Entities will continue to have the option to perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. ASU No. 2017-04 is effective for the Company in fiscal 2020 and must be applied prospectively. The Company does not believe the new standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Benefit Cost. The ASU requires the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be presented in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Other components of the net periodic benefit cost are to be presented separately, in an appropriately titled line item outside of any subtotal of operating income or disclosed in the footnotes. The standard also limits the amount eligible for capitalization to the service cost component. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and the Company is currently assessing the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

2. Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations

Long-Term Debt - During the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017, the Company issued $50,000,000 of unsecured senior notes privately placed with three institutional lenders. The notes bear interest at 4.32% per annum and mature in fiscal 2027. The Company used the net proceeds of the sale of the notes to repay outstanding indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.

Also during the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017, a note that matured in January 2017 with a balance of $24,226,000 was repaid and replaced with borrowings on the Company’s revolving credit facility and a new $15,000,000 mortgage note bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.75%, effectively 3.75% at March 30, 2017, requiring monthly principal and interest payments and maturing in fiscal 2020. The mortgage note is secured by the related land, building and equipment.

The Company utilizes derivatives principally to manage market risks and reduce its exposure resulting from fluctuations in interest rates. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions.

The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement on February 28, 2013 covering $25,000,000 of floating rate debt, which expires January 22, 2018, and requires the Company to pay interest at a defined rate of 0.96% while receiving interest at a defined variable rate of one-month LIBOR (1.0% at March 30, 2017). The notional amount of the swap is $25,000,000. The Company recognizes derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and on the type of hedging relationship. Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. For derivatives that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The Company’s interest rate swap agreement was considered effective and qualified as a cash flow hedge from inception through June 16, 2016, at which time the derivative was undesignated and the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $159,000 ($96,000 net of tax) was reclassified into interest expense. As of June 16, 2016, the swap was considered ineffective for accounting purposes. As such, the $40,000 increase in the fair value of the swap for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017 was recorded as a reduction to interest expense. The Company does not expect the interest rate swap to have a material effect on earnings within the next 11 months, at which time the agreement will expire.

Capital Lease Obligations - During fiscal 2012, the Company entered into a master licensing agreement with CDF2 Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp (CDF2), whereby CDF2 purchased on the Company’s behalf, and then deployed and licensed back to the Company, digital cinema projection systems (the “systems”) for use by the Company in its theatres. As of March 30, 2017, 642 of the Company’s screens were utilizing the systems under a 10-year master licensing agreement with CDF2. Included in furniture, fixtures and equipment is $45,510,000 related to the digital systems as of March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016, which is being amortized over the remaining estimated useful life of the assets. Accumulated amortization of the digital systems was $29,838,000 and $28,294,000 as of March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016, respectively.

Under the terms of the master licensing agreement, the Company made an initial one-time payment to CDF2. The Company expects that the balance of CDF2’s costs to deploy the systems will be covered primarily through the payment of virtual print fees (VPF’s) from film distributors to CDF2 each time a digital movie is booked on one of the systems deployed on a Company screen. The Company agreed to make an average number of bookings of eligible digital movies on each screen on which a licensed system has been deployed to provide for a minimum level of VPF’s paid by distributors (standard booking commitment) to CDF2. To the extent the VPF’s paid by distributors are less than the standard booking commitment, the Company must make a shortfall payment to CDF2. Based upon the Company’s historical booking patterns, the Company does not expect to make any shortfall payments during the life of the agreement. Accounting Standards Codification No. 840, Leases, requires that the Company consider the entire amount of the standard booking commitment minimum lease payments for purposes of determining the capital lease obligation. The maximum amount per year that the Company could be required to pay is approximately $6,163,000 until the obligation is fully satisfied.

The Company’s capital lease obligation is being reduced as VPF’s are paid by the film distributors to CDF2. The Company has recorded the reduction of the obligation associated with the payment of VPF’s as a reduction of the interest related to the obligation and the amortization incurred related to the systems, as the payments represent a specific reimbursement of the cost of the systems by the studios. Based on the Company’s expected minimum number of eligible movies to be booked, the Company expects the obligation to be reduced by at least $5,636,000 within the next 12 months. This reduction will be recognized as an offset to amortization and is expected to offset the majority of the amortization of the systems.

In conjunction with theatres acquired in December 2016, the Company became the obligor of several movie theatre and equipment leases with unaffiliated third parties that qualify for capital lease accounting. Included in buildings and improvements as of March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016 is a preliminary value of $15,799,000 related to these leases, with accumulated amortization of $460,000 as of March 30, 2017. Included in furniture, fixtures and equipment as of March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016 is a preliminary value of $1,712,000 related to these leases, with accumulated amortization of $71,000 as of March 30, 2017. The assets are being amortized over the remaining lease terms. The Company paid $775,000 in lease payments on these capital leases during the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017.

3. Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate, adjusted for losses from noncontrolling interests, for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was 37.7% and 39.3%, respectively. The Company does not include the income tax expense or benefit related to the net earnings or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in its income tax expense as the entities are considered pass-through entities and, as such, the income tax expense or benefit is attributable to its owners.

4. Business Segment Information

The Company’s primary operations are reported in the following business segments: Theatres and Hotels/Resorts. Corporate items include amounts not allocable to the business segments. Corporate revenues consist principally of rent and the corporate operating loss includes general corporate expenses. Corporate information technology costs and accounting shared services costs are allocated to the business segments based upon several factors, including actual usage and segment revenues.

Following is a summary of business segment information for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017 and March 31, 2016 (in thousands):

THE MARCUS CORPORATION

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain matters discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q are “forward-looking statements” intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may generally be identified as such because the context of such statements include words such as we “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect” or words of similar import. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which may cause results to differ materially from those expected, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) the availability, in terms of both quantity and audience appeal, of motion pictures for our theatre division, as well as other industry dynamics such as the maintenance of a suitable window between the date such motion pictures are released in theatres and the date they are released to other distribution channels; (2) the effects of adverse economic conditions in our markets, particularly with respect to our hotels and resorts division; (3) the effects on our occupancy and room rates of the relative industry supply of available rooms at comparable lodging facilities in our markets; (4) the effects of competitive conditions in our markets; (5) our ability to achieve expected benefits and performance from our strategic initiatives and acquisitions; (6) the effects of increasing depreciation expenses, reduced operating profits during major property renovations, impairment losses, and preopening and start-up costs due to the capital intensive nature of our businesses; (7) the effects of adverse weather conditions, particularly during the winter in the Midwest and in our other markets; (8) our ability to identify properties to acquire, develop and/or manage and the continuing availability of funds for such development; and (9) the adverse impact on business and consumer spending on travel, leisure and entertainment resulting from terrorist attacks in the United States or other incidents of violence in public venues such as hotels and movie theatres. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made herein are made only as of the date of this Form 10-Q and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

We report our consolidated and individual segment results of operations on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Thursday in December. Fiscal 2017 is a 52-week year beginning on December 30, 2016 and ending on December 28, 2017. Fiscal 2016 was a 52-week year beginning January 1, 2016 and ended on December 29, 2016.

We divide our fiscal year into three 13-week quarters and a final quarter consisting of 13 or 14 weeks. The first quarter of fiscal 2017 consisted of the 13-week period beginning December 30, 2016 and ended on March 30, 2017. The first quarter of fiscal 2016 consisted of the 13-week period beginning on January 1, 2016 and ended on March 31, 2016. Our primary operations are reported in the following two business segments: movie theatres and hotels and resorts.

The following table sets forth revenues, operating income, other income (expense), net earnings and net earnings per common share for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 (in millions, except for per share and variance percentage data):

Revenues increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 due to increased revenues from both our theatre division and hotels and resorts division. Operating income (earnings before other income/expense and income taxes) and net earnings attributable to The Marcus Corporation increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 due to record operating results from our theatre division, partially offset by a small increase in operating loss from our hotels and resorts division.

Operating results from our theatre division were favorably impacted by a stronger slate of movies during the fiscal 2017 first quarter compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016, increased attendance resulting from positive customer response to our recent investments and pricing strategies, and increased concession sales per person due to our expanded food and beverage offerings. New theatres also favorably impacted revenues and operating income from our theatre division during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. In mid-October 2016, we opened a newly renovated theatre in Country Club Hills, Illinois. In mid-December 2016, our theatre division acquired Wehrenberg Theatres® (which we refer to as Wehrenberg), a Midwestern theatre circuit consisting of 14 theatres with 197 screens, plus an 84,000 square foot retail center.

Revenues from our hotels and resorts division were favorably impacted by increased room revenues for comparable hotels during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Operating results from our hotels and resorts division were unfavorably impacted by preopening expenses from our new SafeHouse® restaurant and bar that we opened in downtown Chicago, Illinois, adjacent to our AC Chicago Downtown Hotel. The new location opened on March 1, 2017.

We did not have any significant variations in investment income or net equity earnings (losses) from unconsolidated joint ventures during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Losses on disposition of property, equipment and other assets increased by approximately $286,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 due to a write off of disposed equipment at one of our hotels. The timing of periodic sales and disposals of our property and equipment may vary from quarter to quarter, resulting in variations in our reported gains or losses on disposition of property and equipment.

Our interest expense totaled $2.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $2.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2016, an increase of approximately $500,000, or 21.4%. The increase in interest expense during the fiscal 2017 period was due entirely to payments we made on the approximately $17.5 million of capital lease obligations we assumed in the Wehrenberg acquisition. An increase in our total borrowings under long-term debt agreements during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 was offset by a lower average interest rate during fiscal 2017, as we had a greater percentage of lower-cost variable rate debt in our debt portfolio during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Changes in our borrowing levels due to variations in our operating results, capital expenditures, share repurchases and asset sale proceeds, among other items, may impact our actual reported interest expense in future periods, as would changes in the mix between fixed rate debt and variable rate debt in our debt portfolio.

We reported income tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 of $5.7 million, an increase of approximately $2.2 million, or 61.8%, compared to income tax expense of $3.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The increase in income tax expense was the result of increased earnings, partially offset by the fact that our fiscal 2017 first quarter effective income tax rate, after adjusting for a loss from noncontrolling interests that is not tax-effected because the entities involved are tax pass-through entities, was 37.7%, compared to our fiscal 2016 first quarter effective income tax rate of 39.3%. As of the date of this report, we anticipate that our effective income tax rate for the remaining quarters of fiscal 2017 will remain close to our historical 38-40% average, excluding any changes in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits or potential changes in federal and state income tax rates. Our actual fiscal 2017 effective income tax rate may be different from our estimated quarterly rates depending upon actual facts and circumstances.

The operating results of two majority-owned hotels, The Skirvin Hilton and The Lincoln Marriott Cornhusker Hotel, are included in the hotels and resorts division revenue and operating income, and the after-tax net earnings or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests is deducted from or added to net earnings on the consolidated statements of earnings. We reported a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of $336,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to a net loss of $172,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

Theatres

The following table sets forth revenues, operating income and operating margin for our theatre division for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 (in millions, except for variance percentage and operating margin):

Our theatre division revenues and operating income increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 due primarily to new theatres that we opened or acquired during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 and an increase in attendance and our average concession revenues per person at comparable theatres, resulting in increased box office receipts and concession revenues. Despite higher fixed costs, such as depreciation and amortization, rent and property taxes, due in part to the Wehrenberg acquisition, our theatre division operating margin also increased slightly during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Increased other revenues, slightly lower film costs and our continued emphasis on controlling costs contributed to the improvement in our operating margin.

The following table provides a further breakdown of the components of revenues for the theatre division for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 (in millions, except for variance percentage):

A significant portion of the increase in our box office receipts and concession revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 was due to the impact of the 14 theatres and 197 screens that we acquired from Wehrenberg and the 16-screen theatre that we opened in Country Club Hills, Illinois during our fiscal 2016 fourth quarter. Excluding these new theatres and four screens that we added to existing theatres during fiscal 2016, box office receipts and concession revenues for comparable theatres still increased 9.1% and 11.5%, respectively, during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

According to data received from Rentrak (a national box office reporting service for the theatre industry) and compiled by us to evaluate our fiscal 2017 first quarter results, United States box office receipts increased 7.0% during our fiscal 2017 first quarter, indicating that our box office receipts at comparable theatres during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 outperformed the industry by 2.1 percentage points. We outperformed the industry despite the fact that we had nearly 5% of our comparable screens out of service during long portions of the fiscal 2017 first quarter due to renovations underway at multiple theatres. We have now outperformed the industry average during thirteen of the last fourteen interim reporting periods. We believe our continued outperformance to the industry average is attributable to the investments we have made in new features and amenities in select theatres and our implementation of innovative operating and marketing strategies, including our $5 Tuesday promotion and our customer loyalty program.

Excluding the Wehrenberg theatres, our average ticket price increased 0.7% during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to modest price increases we implemented in November 2016. In addition, the fact that we have increased our number of premium large format (PLF) screens, along with a corresponding price premium, also contributed to our increased average ticket price during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Conversely, we believe that a change in film product mix had a negative impact on our average ticket price during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Our top two films during the fiscal 2017 period were the PG-rated family movies Beauty and the Beast and The LEGO® Batman Movie (resulting in a higher percentage of lower-priced children’s tickets sold), compared to our top two films during the first quarter of fiscal 2016, which included the R-rated film Deadpool and PG-13 rated film Star Wars: The Force Awakens (resulting in a higher percentage of higher-priced adult tickets sold). In addition, the percentage of our total box office receipts attributable to 3D presentations decreased during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 due primarily to weaker 3D performances from our top fiscal 2017 first quarter films, contributing to a lesser increase in our average ticket price than we might otherwise expect. The increase in average ticket price contributed approximately $277,000, or 6.5%, of the increase in our comparable theatre box office receipts during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

Our concession revenues increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 due in part to increased attendance at comparable theatres. In addition, our average concession revenues per person at comparable theatres (excluding the Wehrenberg theatres) increased by 2.8% during our first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The increase in our average concession revenues per person contributed approximately $831,000, or approximately 24.3%, of the increase in our comparable theatre concession revenues during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

A change in concession product mix, including increased sales of non-traditional food and beverage items from our increased number of Take Five Lounge^SM, Zaffiro’s® Express and Reel Sizzle® outlets, as well as modest selected price increases we introduced in November 2016, were the primary reasons for our increased average concession sales per person during the fiscal 2017 period. Conversely, although family films generally have a favorable impact on traditional concession sales (popcorn, soda, candy, etc.), as these types of films typically result in stronger traditional concession sales compared to more adult-oriented films, we believe that the above described change in film product mix during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 slowed the growth of our overall average concession sales per person, as family-oriented films tend not to contribute to sales of non-traditional food and beverage items as much as adult-oriented films.

Other revenues increased by approximately $3.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Approximately $1.5 million of this increase related to comparable theatres and was due primarily to an increase in preshow advertising income and internet surcharge ticketing fees. The remaining increase in other revenues is attributable to the Wehrenberg theatres, including preshow advertising income, internet surcharge ticketing fees and rental income from the retail center described above.

Total theatre attendance increased 35.9% during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Excluding the Wehrenberg theatres and the Country Club Hills theatre, comparable theatre attendance increased 8.6% during the quarter, due primarily to a stronger film slate in the current year period. We believe a combination of several additional factors contributed to this increase in attendance and our above-described industry average outperformance. In addition to the $5 Tuesday promotion that continued to perform well, we believe our fiscal 2017 first quarter attendance was favorably impacted by increased attendance at theatres that have added our spacious new DreamLounger^SM electric all-recliner seating, our proprietary UltraScreen DLX® and SuperScreen DLX^SM PLF screens and our unique food and beverage outlets described above. We also believe that we are recognizing the benefits of our customer loyalty program, introduced in March 2014 and which now has over 2.1 million members, including approximately 200,000 members recently added as a result of the Wehrenberg acquisition.

Attendance and box office receipts increased during nine of the 13 weeks of the first quarter of fiscal 2017, with the largest increase occurring in March. The improvement in March box office receipts was particularly noteworthy because last year’s first quarter benefited from the fact that Easter was early, as movie-going generally increases when students are out of school. In fiscal 2017, Easter occurred early in our second quarter. Our highest grossing films during the fiscal 2017 first quarter included Beauty and the Beast, The LEGO® Batman Movie, Hidden Figures, Logan and Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. The film slate during the first quarter of fiscal 2016 was particularly weighted towards strong blockbuster movies, as evidenced by the fact that our top five films during our fiscal 2016 first quarter accounted for 49% of our total box office results, compared to 37% for the top five films during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, both expressed as a percentage of the total box office receipts for the period. This reduced reliance on blockbuster films during the fiscal 2017 period had the effect of slightly decreasing our film rental costs during the period, as generally the better a particular film performs, the greater the film rental cost tends to be as a percentage of box office receipts.

Film product for the second quarter of fiscal 2017 has, through the date of this report, produced box office results slightly greater than the same period of fiscal 2016. Top performing films during this period have included Beauty and the Beast, Boss Baby, The Fate of the Furious and Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.2. Other films scheduled to be released during the second quarter that may generate substantial box office interest include Alien: Covenant, Baywatch, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales, Wonder Woman, The Mummy, Cars 3 and Transformers: The Last Knight. Revenues for the theatre business and the motion picture industry in general are heavily dependent on the general audience appeal of available films, together with studio marketing, advertising and support campaigns and the maintenance of the current “windows” between the date a film is released in theatres and the date a motion picture is released to other channels, including video on-demand and DVD. These are factors over which we have no control.

We ended the first quarter of fiscal 2017 with a total of 874 company-owned screens in 66 theatres and 11 managed screens in two theatres, compared to 659 company-owned screens in 51 theatres and 11 managed screens in two theatres at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2016. In addition to the previously described new theatres opened and acquired during 2016, we opened two new UltraScreen DLX auditoriums at an existing theatre in Minnesota in February 2016 and we opened two new screens at our Palace Cinema in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin in November 2016. We are currently in the process of converting eight more theatres to all-DreamLounger recliner seating, including one Wehrenberg theatre, with expected completion dates by the end of our fiscal 2017 second quarter. We expect to open one new Zaffiro’s Express and convert three existing screens to SuperScreen DLX auditoriums during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. We anticipate beginning construction on additional DreamLounger conversions, SuperScreen DLX conversions and new food and beverage outlets in the near future.

In April 2017, we opened our new 10-screen Southbridge Crossing Cinema in Shakopee, Minnesota. This state-of-the-art theatre includes DreamLounger recliner seating in all auditoriums, two UltraScreen DLX auditoriums, as well as a Take Five Lounge and Zaffiro’s Express outlet. We also continued construction on our first stand-alone all in-theatre dining location, an eight-screen theatre that will be branded BistroPlex^SM and located in Greendale, Wisconsin. We expect this new theatre to open late in our fiscal 2017 second quarter or early in our fiscal 2017 third quarter. We also will consider additional acquisitions of existing theatres or theatre circuits if appropriate opportunities arise.

Hotels and Resorts

The following table sets forth revenues, operating loss and operating margin for our hotels and resorts division for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 (in millions, except for variance percentage and operating margin):

Our first quarter is typically the weakest quarter of our fiscal year for our hotels and resorts division due to the traditionally reduced level of travel at our predominantly Midwestern portfolio of owned properties. Division revenues increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 due to increased room revenues at our owned hotels and resorts. In addition, food and beverage revenues increased due to the fact that we opened our new SafeHouse restaurant and bar in Chicago, Illinois on March 1, 2017 and the fact that our SafeHouse Milwaukee location was closed for a portion of the first quarter last year for renovation. The initial customer response to our new SafeHouse in Chicago has been positive.

Our hotels and resorts division operating loss increased slightly during our fiscal 2017 first quarter compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016, despite increased revenues, due entirely to preopening expenses related to the new SafeHouse Chicago and a reduction in profits from our management company, due in part to a small one-time favorable adjustment last year. Operating losses attributable specifically to our eight owned hotels and resorts decreased during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

The following table sets forth certain operating statistics for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, including our average occupancy percentage (number of occupied rooms as a percentage of available rooms), our average daily room rate, or ADR, and our total revenue per available room, or RevPAR, for company-owned properties:

RevPAR increased at seven of our eight company-owned properties during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. According to data received from Smith Travel Research and compiled by us in order to evaluate our fiscal 2017 first quarter results, comparable “upper upscale” hotels throughout the United States experienced an increase in RevPAR of 3.2% during our fiscal 2017 first quarter compared to the same weeks last year. Data received from Smith Travel Research for our various “competitive sets” – hotels identified in our specific markets that we deem to be competitors to our hotels – indicates that these hotels experienced a decrease in RevPAR of 2.9% during our fiscal 2017 first quarter.

We believe our RevPAR increase and outperformance of the industry and our competitive sets during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 was primarily the result of additional group and transient business during the fiscal 2017 period, as evidenced by our increase in occupancy percentage. Looking to future periods, as of the date of this report, our group room revenue bookings for future periods in fiscal 2017 - something commonly referred to in the hotels and resorts industry as “group pace” - is running slightly behind our group room revenue bookings for future periods last year at this time. Our owned hotels had a slightly above-average group booking period during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. As a result, we hope to be able to make up the shortfall in group room revenue bookings for future periods in the coming months.

Our ADR decreased during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016 because it is generally more difficult to increase ADR during our slower winter season, as overall occupancy is at its lowest. As a result, our focus was on increasing occupancy during our first quarter. Despite this annual challenge, four of our eight company-owned hotels reported increased ADR during the fiscal 2017 first quarter compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

Excluding the negative impact of the SafeHouse Chicago and the reduction in our management company profits described above, our operating margin actually improved by approximately two percentage points during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2016. We believe this improvement in our operating margin at our owned hotels and resorts is due to our continued emphasis on strong cost controls, while still maintaining our high levels of customer service.

We currently expect to report RevPAR increases that generally track the overall industry and local market trends in the remaining quarters of our fiscal 2017. As we noted in prior reports, the pace of the lodging industry’s growth slowed during the second half of fiscal 2016. Group business remains one of the most important segments for several of our hotels and also has an impact on our ADR. Typically, when we have substantial blocks of rooms committed to group business, we are able to raise rates with non-group business. Many reports published by those who closely follow the hotel industry suggest that the United States lodging industry will continue to achieve slightly slower but steady growth in RevPAR in calendar 2017. Whether the current trends in the hotel industry as a whole continue depends in large part on the economic environment in which we operate, as hotel revenues have historically tracked very closely with traditional macroeconomic statistics such as the Gross Domestic Product. We also continue to monitor hotel supply in our markets, as increased supply without a corresponding increase in demand may have a negative impact on our results.

Our hotels and resorts division operating results should benefit in future periods from two current growth initiatives. We continued construction on 29 new all-season villas at the Grand Geneva Resort & Spa, and we have begun opening completed units during our fiscal 2017 second quarter. We are also preparing for the Summer 2017 expected opening of the new Omaha Marriott Downtown at The Capitol District in Omaha, Nebraska, a new hotel that we will manage and in which we hold a minority interest.

Early in the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we ceased management of the Sheraton Madison Hotel in Madison, Wisconsin and sold our 15% minority ownership interest in the property for a small gain. We do not expect this transaction to significantly impact our fiscal 2017 operating results.

We continue to explore opportunities to monetize selected existing owned hotels in the future. We will consider many factors as we actively review opportunities to execute this strategy, including income tax considerations, the ability to retain management, pricing and individual market considerations. Execution of this strategy is also dependent upon a favorable hotel transactional market, which is currently not very active. In addition, we have a number of additional potential growth opportunities that we are currently evaluating. The timing and nature of the opportunities may vary and include pure management contracts, management contracts with equity, and joint venture investments.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

Our movie theatre and hotels and resorts businesses each generate significant and consistent daily amounts of cash, subject to previously-noted seasonality, because each segment’s revenue is derived predominantly from consumer cash purchases. We believe that these relatively consistent and predictable cash sources, as well as the availability of approximately $116 million of unused credit lines as of the end of our fiscal 2017 first quarter, will be adequate to support the ongoing operational liquidity needs of our businesses during the remainder of fiscal 2017.

On December 21, 2016, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) with several purchasers, pursuant to which we issued and sold $50 million in aggregate principal amount of our 4.32% Senior Notes due February 22, 2027 (the “Notes”) in a private placement exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The sale and purchase of the Notes occurred on February 22, 2017. We used the net proceeds of the sale of the Notes to repay outstanding indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.

Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on the twenty-second day of February and August in each year and at maturity, commencing on August 22, 2017. The entire outstanding principal balance of the Notes will be due and payable on February 22, 2027.

The Note Purchase Agreement contains various restrictions and covenants applicable to The Marcus Corporation and certain of our subsidiaries. Among other requirements, the Note Purchase Agreement limits the amount of priority debt (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) for which we or our restricted subsidiaries are obligated to 20% of consolidated total capitalization (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement), limits consolidated debt (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) to 65% of consolidated total capitalization (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) and requires us to maintain a minimum ratio of consolidated operating cash flow (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) to fixed charges (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) for each period of four consecutive fiscal quarters (determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter) of 2.50 to 1.00.

As of March 30, 2017, the ratio of: (a) consolidated debt (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) to consolidated total capitalization (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) was 0.42; and (b) consolidated operating cash flow (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) to fixed charges (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) was 7.4. We expect to be able to meet the financial covenants contained in the Note Purchase Agreement during the remainder of fiscal 2017.

Financial Condition

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $25.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, compared to $10.5 million during the first quarter of the fiscal 2016. The $15.4 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to increased net earnings and the favorable timing in the payment of accounts payable, income taxes and taxes other than income taxes during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, partially offset by the unfavorable timing in the collection of accounts and notes receivable and payment of accrued compensation.

Net cash used in investing activities during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 totaled $20.5 million, compared to $13.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily the result of increased capital expenditures during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and the fact that we sold an interest in a joint venture for $1.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Total cash capital expenditures (including normal continuing capital maintenance and renovation projects) totaled $22.2 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $16.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Approximately $8.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively, of our capital expenditures during the first quarters of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 were related to the development of previously-described new theatres. We did not incur any acquisition-related capital expenditures during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 or the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

Fiscal 2017 first quarter cash capital expenditures included approximately $15.8 million incurred in our theatre division, including previously-described new theatre development costs and costs associated with the addition of DreamLounger recliner seating, SuperScreen DLX auditorium conversions and new Zaffiro’s Express and Reel Sizzle outlets to existing theatres. We also incurred capital expenditures in our hotels and resorts division during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 of approximately $6.2 million, including costs associated with the development of our new SafeHouse Chicago location and the previously-described development of new villas at the Grand Geneva Resort & Spa. Fiscal 2016 first quarter cash capital expenditures included approximately $14.4 million incurred in our theatre division, including costs associated with the addition of DreamLounger recliner seating, new UltraScreen DLX auditoriums and new Zaffiro’s Express and Reel Sizzle outlets to existing theatres. We also incurred capital expenditures in our hotels and resorts division during the first quarter of fiscal 2016 of approximately $2.1 million, including costs associated with the renovation of the SafeHouse Milwaukee and Skirvin Hilton.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 totaled $2.1 million compared to $5.7 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. We used excess cash during both periods to reduce our borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As short-term borrowings became due, we replaced them as necessary with new short-term borrowings. As a result, we added $79.0 million of new short-term borrowings and we made $114.0 million of repayments on short-term borrowings during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 (net decrease in borrowings on our credit facility of $35.0 million) compared to $49.0 million of new short-term borrowings and $34.0 million of repayments on short-term borrowings made during the first quarter of fiscal 2016 (net increase in borrowings on our credit facility of $15.0 million).

Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt totaled $65.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and included the issuance of $50 million of senior notes described above. In addition, we repaid a mortgage note that matured in January 2017 with a balance of $24.2 million as of December 29, 2016 during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and replaced it with borrowings under our revolving credit facility and the issuance of a $15.0 million mortgage note bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.75%, requiring monthly principal and interest payments and maturing in fiscal 2020. Principal payments on long-term debt were $24.4 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 (including the mortgage note repayment described above) compared to payments of $1.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Our debt-to-capitalization ratio (excluding our capital lease obligations) was 0.42 at March 30, 2017 and December 29, 2016.

We repurchased approximately 640 shares of our common stock for approximately $20,000 in conjunction with the exercise of stock options during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, compared to 257,000 shares repurchased for approximately $4.7 million in the open market or in conjunction with the exercise of stock options during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. As of March 30, 2017, approximately 2.9 million shares remained available for repurchase under prior Board of Directors repurchase authorizations. We expect that we will execute any future repurchases on the open market or in privately-negotiated transactions, depending upon a number of factors, including prevailing market conditions.

Dividend payments during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 totaled $3.4 million compared to dividend payments of $3.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The increase in dividend payments was the result of an 11.1% increase in our regular quarterly dividend payment initiated in March 2017. During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we made distributions to noncontrolling interests of $312,000, compared to none during the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

We previously indicated that we expected our full-year fiscal 2017 capital expenditures, including potential purchases of interests in joint ventures (but excluding any significant unidentified acquisitions), to be in the $100-$120 million range. We are still finalizing the scope and timing of the various projects requested by our two divisions, but at this time, we are not adjusting this estimate. Some of these projects may carry over to the next fiscal year. The actual timing and extent of the implementation of all of our current expansion plans will depend in large part on industry and general economic conditions, our financial performance and available capital, the competitive environment, evolving customer needs and trends, and the availability of attractive opportunities. It is likely that our plans will continue to evolve and change in response to these and other factors.

We have not experienced any material changes in our market risk exposures since December 29, 2016.

Based on their evaluations and the evaluation of management, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Risk factors relating to us are contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2016. No material change to such risk factors has occurred during the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2017.

The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases made by us or on our behalf of our Common Stock during the periods indicated. All of these repurchases were made in conjunction with the exercise of stock options and the purchase of shares in the open market and pursuant to the publicly announced repurchase authorization described below.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

THE MARCUS CORPORATION