MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP - Annual Report: 2006 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 814-00188
MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 04-3291176 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
437 MADISON AVENUE, 38th Floor, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 328-2100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ¨ NO x
Indicated by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act: YES ¨ NO x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer x Non Accelerated Filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
YES ¨ NO x
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the last reported price at which the stock was sold on June 30, 2006 (the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second quarter) was $12.96.
The number of outstanding shares of registrants Common Stock, par value $0.01, as of March 27, 2007 was, 17,428,915.
Table of Contents
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which Definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the registrants fiscal year-
end of December 31, 2006, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this form 10-K
MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.
2006 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
2
Table of Contents
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those statements and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report.
This report contains forward-looking statements relating to future events and future performance applicable to us within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limitation, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions, or future strategies that are signified by the words expects, anticipates, intends, believes, or similar language. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. We caution investors that our business and financial performance are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties.
ITEM 1. | OUR BUSINESS |
We, Medallion Financial Corp. or the Company, are a specialty finance company that has a leading position in originating, acquiring, and servicing loans that finance taxicab medallions and various types of commercial businesses. A wholly-owned portfolio company of ours, Medallion Bank, also originates consumer loans for the purchase of recreational vehicles, boats, and horse trailers. Our core philosophy has been In niches there are riches. We try to identify markets that are profitable and where we can become an industry leader. Our investment objectives are to provide a high level of distributable income, consistent with the preservation of capital, as well as long-term growth of net asset value and our stock price. For additional information about our business and operations, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Since 1996, the year in which we became a public company, we have increased our taxicab medallion loan portfolio at a compound annual growth rate of 12%, and our commercial loan portfolio at a compound annual growth rate of 8%. Since Medallion Bank began originating consumer loans, it has increased that portfolio by $31,168,000 as of December 31, 2006. Total assets under our management, which includes assets serviced for third party investors and managed by unconsolidated portfolio companies, were approximately $907,133,000 as of December 31, 2006 and $802,000,000 as of December 31, 2005, and have grown at a compound annual growth rate of 15% from $215,000,000 at the end of 1996. Since our initial public offering in 1996, we have paid dividends in excess of $104,951,000 or $7.01 per share.
We conduct our business through various wholly-owned investment company subsidiaries including:
| Medallion Funding Corp., or Medallion Funding, a Small Business Investment Company, or SBIC, and a regulated investment company, or RIC, our primary taxicab lending company; |
| Medallion Business Credit LLC, an originator of loans to small businesses for the purpose of financing inventory and receivables; |
| Medallion Capital, an SBIC and a RIC, which conducts a mezzanine financing business; and |
| Freshstart Venture Capital Corp., or Freshstart, an SBIC and a RIC, which originates and services taxicab medallion and commercial loans. |
We also conduct business through a wholly-owned portfolio company, Medallion Bank, a bank regulated by the FDIC and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions which originates taxicab medallion, commercial, and consumer loans, raises deposits, and conducts other banking activities. Medallion Bank provides us with our lowest costs of funds which it raises through bank certificates of deposits issued to its customers. To take advantage of this low cost of funds, we refer a portion of our taxicab medallion and commercial loans to Medallion Bank, which then originates these loans, which are serviced by us. We earn referral and servicing fees for these activities.
We are a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). We have elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. We have also elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. As a RIC, we generally do not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our shareholders as dividends if we meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. Medallion Bank is not a RIC and must pay corporate-level federal income taxes.
We are managed by our executive officers under the supervision of our board of directors. As a result, we do not pay investment advisory fees, but instead we incur the operating costs associated with employing investment and portfolio management professionals. Alvin Murstein, our chairman and chief executive officer, has over 45 years of experience in the ownership, management, and financing of taxicab medallions and other commercial businesses. Andrew M. Murstein, our president, has 20 years of experience and is the third generation in his family to participate in the business.
3
Table of Contents
Since Medallion Bank commenced operations in December 2003, we had historically consolidated Medallion Banks financial statements with those of our own. Although Medallion Bank is not an investment company, and SEC rules generally do not permit investment companies such as ours to consolidate the financial statements of non-investment companies, such as Medallion Bank, we had sought and obtained a letter from the SEC in March 2004 permitting such consolidation. We believed that consolidating Medallion Bank provided a more complete and accurate representation of our full scope of operations, and our complete financial position and results of operations.
During August 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form N-2 which the SEC staff reviewed and on which they provided comments, including those relating to the consolidation of the accounts of Medallion Bank. Based on discussion with the SEC staff, we determined during the 2006 fourth quarter to voluntarily not consolidate Medallion Bank and present Medallion Bank as a portfolio company. We determined that this change represents a change in the reporting entity as described in SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. Accordingly, we have retrospectively applied this change to the financial statements of all prior periods presented, including previously issued interim periods presented. The effect of this retrospective application is to present our financial position and results of operations as if Medallion Bank had not been consolidated for all periods presented and to present Medallion Bank as an unconsolidated portfolio investment. Although this creates changes in the reported levels of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations, shareholders equity, and the related amounts per common share are unchanged.
Because of the change in the reporting entity described above and in note 3 to our consolidated financial statements, our financial condition and results of operations included in this annual report for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, including for any interim periods presented, have been adjusted to reflect the change retrospectively for all periods and information presented.
Our Market
We provide loans to individuals and small to mid-size businesses, both directly through our investment company subsidiaries and also through Medallion Bank, in three primary markets:
| loans that finance taxicab medallions; |
| loans that finance commercial businesses; and |
| loans that finance consumer purchases of recreational vehicles, boats, and horse trailers. |
The following chart shows the components of our $833,639,000 managed net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006.
On-Balance Sheet | Off-Balance Sheet (1) | Total Managed Investments | ||||||||
Medallion loans |
$ | 428,249,000 | $ | 93,944,000 | $ | 522,193,000 | ||||
Commercial loans |
88,207,000 | 60,237,000 | 148,444,000 | |||||||
Consumer loans |
0 | 111,799,000 | 111,799,000 | |||||||
Investment securities |
9,961,000 | 21,683,000 | 31,644,000 | |||||||
Equity investments |
16,068,000 | 0 | 16,068,000 | |||||||
Investments in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
50,448,000 | (46,957,000 | ) | 3,491,000 | ||||||
Net investment portfolio |
$ | 592,933,000 | $ | 240,706,000 | $ | 833,639,000 | ||||
(1) | Off-balance sheet investments are those owned by our wholly-owned unconsolidated portfolio companies, primarily Medallion Bank. |
In addition to our finance business, we also conducted a taxicab rooftop advertising business. We discontinued these operations during the 2004 third quarter upon the merger of Medallion Taxi Media with a subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications, and the sale of Medallion Media Japan to its management.
Medallion Loans
Taxi medallion loans of $428,249,000 comprised 72% of our $592,933,000 net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006, compared to $375,263,000 or 71% of our $530,222,000 net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2005. Managed taxi medallion
4
Table of Contents
loans of $522,193,000 comprised 63% of our $833,639,000 managed net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006, compared to $449,157,000 or 62% of our $723,253,000 managed net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2005. Including loans to unaffiliated investors, the total amount of medallion loans under our management was $527,976,000 as of December 31, 2006, compared to $458,457,000 as of December 31, 2005. Since 1979, we and Medallion Bank have originated, on a combined basis, approximately $864,877,000 in medallion loans in New York City, Chicago, Boston, Newark, Cambridge, and other cities within the United States. In addition, our management has a long history of owning, managing, and financing taxicab fleets, taxicab medallions, and corporate car services, dating back to 1956.
Medallion loans collateralized by New York City taxicab medallions and related assets comprised approximately 79% of the value of the medallion loan portfolio as of December 31, 2006 and 76% of the value of the medallion loan portfolio as of December 31, 2005, and were 82% and 78% on a managed basis. The New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission, or TLC, estimates that the total value of all of New York City taxicab medallions and related assets exceeded $6.4 billion as of December 31, 2006. We estimate that the total value of all taxicab medallions and related assets in the US exceeded $8.0 billion as of December 31, 2006.
Although some of the medallion loans have from time to time been in arrears or in default, our loss experience on medallion loans has been negligible. We believe that our medallion loan portfolio is of high credit quality because medallions have generally increased in value and are relatively simple to repossess and resell in an active market. In the past, when a borrower has defaulted on a loan, we have repossessed the medallion collateralizing that loan. If the loan was not brought current, the medallion was sold in the active market at prices at or in excess of the amounts due.
The following table displays information on managed medallion loans outstanding (other than those managed for third party investors) in each of our major markets at December 31, 2006. For a presentation of only the consolidated on-balance sheet medallion loans, see the Consolidated Schedule of Investments in the consolidated financial statements on page F-31.
# of Loans | % of Medallion Loan Portfolio (1) |
Average Interest Rate (2) |
Principal Balance |
|||||||||
Managed medallion loans |
||||||||||||
New York |
1,397 | 83 | % | 6.71 | % | $ | 430,135,999 | |||||
Boston |
203 | 6 | 8.09 | 33,738,802 | ||||||||
Chicago |
346 | 6 | 6.89 | 32,223,898 | ||||||||
Newark |
120 | 2 | 8.32 | 11,783,217 | ||||||||
Cambridge |
41 | 2 | 7.92 | 8,337,104 | ||||||||
Other |
45 | 1 | 7.60 | 5,933,388 | ||||||||
Total managed medallion loans |
2,152 | 100 | % | 6.88 | 522,152,408 | |||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
869,108 | |||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(828,364 | ) | ||||||||||
Net managed medallion loans |
$ | 522,193,152 | ||||||||||
(1) | Based on principal balance outstanding. |
(2) | Based on the contractual adjustable or fixed rates of the portfolios at December 31, 2006. |
The New York City Market. A New York City taxicab medallion is the only permitted license to operate a taxicab and accept street hails in New York City. As reported by the TLC, individual (owner-driver) medallions sold for approximately $411,000 and corporate medallions sold for approximately $525,000 as of December 31, 2006. The number of taxicab medallions is limited by law, and as a result of the limited supply of medallions, an active market for medallions has developed. The law limiting the number of medallions also stipulates that the ownership for the 13,000 medallions outstanding as of December 31, 2006 shall remain divided into 5,571 individual medallions and 7,429 fleet or corporate medallions. Corporate medallions are more valuable because they can be aggregated by businesses, leased to drivers, and operated for more than one shift. New York City auctioned 600 additional medallions during 2004 and auctioned an additional 308 medallions during June 2006. The medallions auctioned in June 2006 were restricted to hybrid fuel vehicles and wheelchair accessible vehicles. New York City announced a 25% fare hike to support the increased level of medallions, which took effect in the 2004 second quarter. The results of the auctions held were highly successful with a large number of bids received, and record-setting medallion values established, with corporate hybrid medallions alone garnering a minimum acceptable bid of $500,000.
A prospective medallion owner must qualify under the medallion ownership standards set and enforced by the TLC. These standards prohibit individuals with criminal records from owning medallions, require that the funds used to purchase medallions be derived from legitimate sources, and mandate that taxicab vehicles and meters meet TLC specifications. In addition, before the TLC will approve a medallion transfer, the TLC requires a letter from the sellers insurer stating that there are no outstanding claims for personal injuries in excess of insurance coverage. After the transfer is approved, the owners taxicab is subject to quarterly TLC inspections.
5
Table of Contents
Most New York City medallion transfers are handled through approximately 30 medallion brokers licensed by the TLC. In addition to brokering medallions, these brokers also arrange for TLC documentation insurance, vehicles, meters, and financing. We have excellent relations with many of the most active brokers, and regularly receive referrals from them. Brokers generated 25% of the loans originated during 2006, and 23% for 2005. However, we receive most of our referrals from a small number of brokers.
The Chicago Market. We estimate that Chicago medallions currently sell for approximately $71,000 as December 31, 2006. Pursuant to a municipal ordinance, the number of outstanding medallions is currently capped at 6,950. We estimate that the total value of all Chicago medallions and related assets is over $632,450,000 as of December 31, 2006.
The Boston Market. We estimate that Boston medallions currently sell for approximately $340,000 as of December 31, 2006. The number of Boston medallions is currently capped at 2,025. We estimate that the total value of all Boston medallions and related assets is over $729,000,000 as of December 31, 2006.
The Newark Market. We estimate that Newark medallions currently sell for approximately $215,000 as of December 31, 2006. The number of Newark medallions has been limited to 600 since 1950 by local law. We estimate that the total value of all Newark medallions and related assets is over $141,000,000 as of December 31, 2006.
The Cambridge Market. We estimate that Cambridge medallions currently sell for approximately $340,000 as of December 31, 2006. The number of Cambridge medallions has been limited to 248 since 1945 by a Cambridge city ordinance. We estimate that the total value of all Cambridge medallions and related assets is over $89,280,000 as of December 31, 2006.
Commercial Loans
Commercial loans finance either the purchase of the equipment and related assets necessary to open a new business or the purchase or improvement of an existing business. From the inception of the commercial loan business in 1987 through December 31, 2006, we and Medallion Bank have originated more than 10,000 commercial loans for an aggregate principal amount of approximately $24,912,000. Commercial loans of $88,207,000 comprised 15% of our $592,933,000 net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006, compared to $91,485,000 or 17% of our $530,222,000 net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2005. Managed commercial loans of $148,444,000 comprised 18% of our $833,639,000 net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006, compared to $145,808,000 or 20% of our $723,253,000 managed net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2005. We have increased our commercial loan activity in recent years, primarily because of the attractive higher yielding, floating rate nature of most of this business. The outstanding balances of managed commercial loans have grown at a compound annual rate of 13% since 1996, although balances declined during 2002 and 2003, as we sought to increase liquidity by selling and not renewing certain loans, and have grown 55% during 2004, reflecting a return to our historical growth patterns. The increase since 1996 has been primarily driven by internal growth through the origination of additional commercial loans. We plan to continue expanding our commercial loan activities by developing a more diverse borrower base, a wider geographic area of coverage, and by expanding targeted industries.
Commercial loans are generally secured by equipment, accounts receivable, real estate, or other assets, and have interest rates averaging 321 basis points over the prevailing prime rate. As with medallion loans, the vast majority of the principals of borrowers personally guarantee commercial loans. The aggregate realized loss of principal on managed commercial loans has averaged less than 2.25% per annum for the last five years.
6
Table of Contents
The following table displays information on managed commercial loans outstanding (other than those managed for third party investors) in each of our major markets at December 31, 2006. For a presentation of only the consolidated on-balance sheet commercial loans, see the Consolidated Schedule of Investments in the consolidated financial statements on page F-31.
# of Loans | % of Commercial Net Portfolio (1) |
Average Interest Rate (2) |
Principal Balance |
|||||||||
Managed commercial Loans |
||||||||||||
Asset-based |
75 | 50 | % | 10.46 | % | $ | 75,509,423 | |||||
Secured mezzanine |
35 | 35 | 13.78 | 53,731,415 | ||||||||
Other secured commercial |
163 | 15 | 9.30 | 22,592,158 | ||||||||
Total managed commercial loans |
273 | 100 | % | 11.46 | 151,832,996 | |||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
79,957 | |||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(3,468,593 | ) | ||||||||||
Net managed commercial loans |
$ | 148,444,360 | ||||||||||
(1) | Based on principal balance outstanding |
(2) | Based on the contractual rates of the portfolios at December 31, 2006. |
Asset Based Loans. Through our subsidiary Medallion Business Credit, we originate, manage, and service asset-based loans to small businesses which require working capital credit facilities ranging from $500,000 to $3,500,000. Medallion Business Credit frequently refers a portion of its potential commercial loans to Medallion Bank to originate, so that we can benefit from Medallion Banks lower cost of funds. Together, these loans represent approximately 50% of the managed commercial loan portfolio as of December 31, 2006 and 47% as of December 31, 2005. The credit facilities are secured principally by the borrowers accounts receivable, but may also be secured by inventory, machinery, equipment, and/or real estate, and are personally guaranteed by the principals. Currently, our clients are mostly located in the New York metropolitan area and include manufacturers, distributors, and service organizations. We had successfully established 40 credit lines as of December 31, 2006.
Secured Mezzanine Loans. Through our subsidiary Medallion Capital, we originate both senior and subordinated loans to businesses in a variety of industries, including radio and television stations, airport food service operations, and various manufacturing concerns. These loans are primarily secured by a second position on all assets of the businesses, range from $1,000,000 to $5,000,000, and represent approximately 35% of our managed commercial loan portfolio as of December 31, 2006, and 35% as of December 31, 2005. Frequently, we receive warrants to purchase an equity interest in the borrowers of secured mezzanine loans.
Other Secured Commercial Loans. We originate other commercial loans that are not concentrated in any particular industry. These loans represented approximately 15% of the managed commercial loan portfolio as of December 31, 2006, and 18% as of December 31, 2005. Historically, this portfolio had consisted of fixed-rate loans, but substantially all business originated over the last four years has been at adjustable interest rates, generally repricing on their anniversary date. Borrowers include food service, real estate, dry cleaner, and laundromat businesses.
SBA Section 7(a) Loans. Through our subsidiary Business Lenders, we originated loans under the Section 7(a) program of the SBA. On October 17, 2005, we sold substantially all of the assets of Business Lenders to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch.
Consumer Loans
Consumer loans are originated by Medallion Bank, a wholly-owned, unconsolidated portfolio company. Consumer loans of $111,799,000 comprised 13% of our $833,639,000 managed net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006 and consumer loans of $85,678,000 comprised 12% of our $723,253,000 managed net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2005. The loans are collateralized by recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers located in all 50 states. The portfolio is serviced by a third party subsidiary of a major commercial bank. We believe that Medallion Banks consumer loan portfolio is of acceptable credit quality given the high interest rates earned on the loans, which compensate for the higher degree of credit risk in the portfolio.
Our Strategy
Our core philosophy has been In niches there are riches. We try to identify markets that are profitable and where we can be an industry leader. Key elements of our strategy include:
Capitalize on our relationships with brokers and dealers. We are committed to establishing, building, and maintaining our relationships with our brokers and dealers. Our marketing efforts are focused on building relationships with brokers in the medallion market and dealers in the consumer market. We believe that our relationships with brokers and dealers provide us with, in addition to
7
Table of Contents
potential investment opportunities, other significant benefits, including an additional layer of due diligence and additional monitoring capabilities. We have assembled a management team that has developed an extensive network of broker and dealer relationships in our target market over the last 50 years. We believe that our management teams relationships with these brokers and dealers have and will continue to provide us with significant investment opportunities. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 25% of our completed investment transactions (based on the fair value of our investments as of December 31, 2006) were generated by brokers and dealers.
Employ disciplined underwriting policies and maintain rigorous portfolio monitoring. We have an extensive investment underwriting and monitoring process. We conduct a thorough analysis of each potential investment and its prospects, competitive position, financial performance, and industry dynamics. We stress the importance of credit and risk analysis in our underwriting process. We believe that our continued adherence to this disciplined process will permit us to continue to generate a stable, diversified and increasing revenue stream of current income from our debt investments to enable us to make distributions to our shareholders.
Leverage the skills of our experienced management team. Our management team is led by our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Alvin Murstein, and our President, Mr. Andrew M. Murstein. Alvin Murstein has over 45 years of experience in the ownership, management, and financing of taxicab medallions and other commercial businesses, and Andrew M. Murstein is the third generation in his family to participate in the business. The other members of our management team have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at specialty finance companies, middle market commercial banks, and other financial services companies. We believe that the experience and contacts of our management team will continue to allow us to effectively implement the key aspects of our business strategy.
Perform Strategic Acquisitions. In addition to increasing market share in existing lending markets and identifying new niches, we seek to acquire medallion financing businesses and related portfolios and specialty finance companies that make secured loans to small businesses which have experienced historically low loan losses similar to our own. Since our initial public offering in May 1996, eight specialty finance companies, four loan portfolios, and three taxicab rooftop advertising companies have been acquired. Our most recent acquisitions were the purchase of a recreational vehicle/marine loan portfolio by Medallion Bank in April 2004 for $86,309,000, and the purchase of a taxicab medallion loan portfolio by Medallion Funding and Medallion Bank in January 2006 for $35,703,000.
Investment Activity
The following table sets forth the components of investment activity in the managed investment portfolio for the periods indicated
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Net investments at beginning of year |
$ | 722,747,768 | $ | 643,167,915 | (4) | $ | 379,158,525 | |||||
Investments originated |
434,626,848 | 337,885,639 | 303,369,002 | |||||||||
Purchase of Banco Popular medallion loan portfolio |
35,703,391 | | | |||||||||
Repayments of investments |
(358,898,612 | ) | (225,513,110 | ) | (144,835,651 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gains (losses) on investments (3) |
6,273,343 | 1,243,041 | (256,347 | ) | ||||||||
Transfers from (to) other assets/liabilities |
(3,664,350 | ) | (7,011,897 | ) | (439,841 | ) | ||||||
Net increase in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) (1) (2) |
(1,670,825 | ) | (6,558,733 | ) | (4,539,807 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of origination costs |
(1,478,685 | ) | (1,935,600 | ) | (1,704,194 | ) | ||||||
Cash received for sold Business Lenders SBA Section 7(a) loans |
| (19,414,095 | ) | | ||||||||
Realized gains on sales of loans |
| 884,608 | 474,074 | |||||||||
Purchase of consumer loan portfolio |
| | 80,631,534 | |||||||||
Clear Channel stock received in exchange for investment in Medallion Taxi Media |
| | 31,683,703 | |||||||||
Net increase in investments |
110,891,110 | 79,579,853 | 264,382,483 | |||||||||
Net investments at end of year |
$ | 833,638,878 | $ | 722,747,768 | $ | 643,541,008 | ||||||
(1) | Net of unrealized depreciation related to Medallion Taxi Media of $0, $0, and $2,826,600 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. |
(2) | Excludes net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of $920,206, ($1,123,136), and ($512,279) for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, related to foreclosed properties, which are carried in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. |
(3) | Excludes net realized gains of $4,127, $0, and $22,226 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, related to foreclosed properties, which are carried in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. |
(4) | Includes a reduction of $373,093 related to 2004 balance reclassifications that was reflected as an adjustment to the 2005 beginning balance. |
8
Table of Contents
Investment Characteristics
Medallion Loans. Our medallion loan portfolio consists of mostly fixed-rate loans, collateralized by first security interests in taxicab medallions and related assets (vehicles, meters, and the like). The portfolio was originated at an approximate loan-to-value ratio range of 80-90%. We estimate that the average loan-to-value ratio of all of the medallion loans was approximately 53% as of December 31, 2006. In addition, we have recourse against a vast majority of the owners of the taxicab medallions and related assets through personal guarantees.
Medallion loans generally require equal monthly payments covering accrued interest and amortization of principal over a ten to fifteen year schedule, subject to a balloon payment of all outstanding principal after four or five years. More recently, we have begun to originate loans with one-to-three year maturities where interest rates are adjusted and a new maturity period set. Borrowers may prepay medallion loans upon payment of a fee of approximately 90 days interest.
We generally retain the medallion loans we originate; however, from time to time, we participate or sell shares of some loans or portfolios to interested third party financial institutions. In these cases, we retain the borrower relationships and service the sold loans.
Commercial Loans. We have originated commercial loans in principal amounts ranging from $50,000 to approximately $5,000,000. These loans are generally retained and typically have maturities ranging from one to ten years and require equal monthly payments covering accrued interest and amortization of principal over a four to five year term. Substantially all loans generally may be prepaid with a fee ranging from 30 to 120 days interest. The term of, and interest rate charged on, certain of our outstanding loans are subject to SBA regulations. Under SBA regulations, the maximum rate of interest permitted on loans originated by us is 19%. Unlike medallion loans, for which competition precludes us from charging the maximum rate of interest permitted under SBA regulations, we are able to charge the maximum rate on certain commercial loans. We believe that the increased yield on commercial loans compensates for their higher risk relative to medallion loans and further illustrates the benefits of diversification.
Commercial loans are generally originated at an average loan-to-value ratio of 70 to 75%. Substantially all of the commercial loans are collateralized by security interests in the assets being financed by the borrower. In addition, we have recourse against the vast majority of the principals of borrowers who personally guarantee the loans. Although personal guarantees increase the commitment of borrowers to repay their loans, we cannot assure you that the assets available under personal guarantees would, if required, be sufficient to satisfy the obligations secured by such guarantees. In certain cases, equipment vendors may provide full and partial recourse guarantees on loans.
Consumer Loans. Consumer loans generally require equal monthly payments covering accrued interest and amortization of principal over a negotiated term, generally around ten years. Interest rates offered are both floating and fixed, and certain of the floating rate notes have built in caps or floors. Borrowers may prepay consumer loans without any prepayment penalty. In general, Medallion Bank has established relationships with dealers in the industry, who are the sources for most of the customers of Medallion Bank.
Marketing, Origination, and Loan Approval Process
We employ 15 loan originators to originate medallion and commercial loans. Each loan application is individually reviewed through analysis of a number of factors, including loan-to-value ratios, a review of the borrowers credit history, public records, personal interviews, trade references, personal inspection of the premises, and approval from the TLC, SBA, or other regulatory body, if applicable. Each applicant is required to provide personal or corporate tax returns, premises leases, and/or property deeds. Senior management establishes loan origination criteria. Loans that conform to such criteria may be processed by a loan officer with the proper credit authority, and non-conforming loans must be approved by the chief executive officer and/or the chief credit officer. Both medallion and commercial loans are sourced from brokers with extensive networks of applicants, and commercial loans are also referred by contacts with banks, attorneys, and accounting firms. Consumer loans are primarily sourced through relationships which have been established with recreational vehicle and boat dealers throughout our market area.
Sources of Funds
We have historically funded our lending operations primarily through credit facilities with bank syndicates and, to a lesser degree, through fixed-rate, senior secured notes and long-term subordinated debentures issued to or guaranteed by the SBA. Since the inception of Medallion Bank, substantially all of Medallion Banks funding has been provided by FDIC insured brokered certificates of deposit. The determination of funding sources is established by our management, based upon an analysis of the respective financial and other costs and burdens associated with funding sources. Our funding strategy and interest rate risk management strategy is to have the proper structuring of debt to minimize both rate and maturity risk, while maximizing returns with the lowest cost of funding over an intermediate period of time.
9
Table of Contents
The table below summarizes our cash levels and borrowings as of December 31, 2006, and amounts outstanding under credit facilities and their respective end of period weighted average interest rates at December 31, 2006. See notes 4 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about each credit facility.
Consolidated Sources of Funds |
Total | |||
Cash |
$ | 15,399 | ||
Bank loans |
26,000 | |||
Amounts available |
15,425 | |||
Amounts outstanding |
15,210 | |||
Average interest rate |
7.41 | % | ||
Maturity |
06/07-12/09 | |||
Lines of credit |
$ | 500,000 | ||
Amounts undisbursed |
151,251 | |||
Amounts outstanding |
348,749 | |||
Average interest rate |
5.52 | % | ||
Maturity |
9/08-12/09 | |||
Margin loan |
$ | 13,927 | ||
Average interest rate |
6.19 | % | ||
Maturity |
N/A | |||
SBA debentures |
$ | 96,750 | ||
Amounts undisbursed |
19,500 | |||
Amounts outstanding |
77,250 | |||
Average interest rate |
6.05 | % | ||
Maturity |
9/11-3/16 | |||
Total cash and remaining amounts undisbursed under credit facilities |
$ | 201,575 | ||
Total debt outstanding |
$ | 455,136 | ||
Medallion Bank Sources of Funds |
||||
Cash |
$ | 14,699 | ||
Brokered CDs |
$ | 261,484 | ||
Average Interest Rate |
4.36 | % | ||
Maturity |
01/07-10/10 | |||
Total cash and remaining amounts undisbursed under credit facilities, including Medallion Bank |
$ | 216,274 | ||
Total debt outstanding, including Medallion Bank |
$ | 716,620 | ||
We fund our fixed-rate loans with variable-rate credit lines and bank debt, and with fixed-rate SBA debentures. The mismatch between maturities and interest-rate sensitivities of these balance sheet items results in interest rate risk. We seek to manage our exposure to increases in market rates of interest to an acceptable level by:
| Originating adjustable rate loans; |
| Incurring fixed-rate debt; and |
| Purchasing interest rate caps to hedge a portion of variable-rate debt against increases in interest rates. |
Nevertheless, we accept varying degrees of interest rate risk depending on market conditions. For additional discussion of our funding sources and asset liability management strategy, see Asset/Liability Management on page 44.
Competition
Banks, credit unions, and finance companies, some of which are SBICs, compete with us in originating medallion, commercial, and consumer loans. In addition, finance subsidiaries of equipment manufacturers also compete with us in originating commercial loans. Many of these competitors have greater resources than we do and certain competitors are subject to less restrictive regulations than us. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to identify and complete the financing transactions that will permit us to compete successfully.
Employees
As of December 31, 2006 we employed 111 persons, including 24 at our Medallion Bank subsidiary. We believe that relations with all of our employees are good.
10
Table of Contents
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a general summary of the material US federal income tax considerations applicable to us and to an investment in shares of our common stock. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of the income tax considerations applicable to such an investment. For example, we have not described tax consequences that we assume to be generally known by investors or certain considerations that may be relevant to certain types of holders subject to special treatment under US federal income tax laws, including shareholders subject to the alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, dealers in securities, pension plans and trusts, and financial institutions. This summary assumes that investors hold our common stock as capital assets (within the meaning of the Code). The discussion is based upon the Code, Treasury regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations, each as of the date of this annual report and all of which are subject to change, possibly retroactively, which could affect the continuing validity of this discussion. We have not sought and will not seek any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, regarding an investment in our common stock. This summary does not discuss any aspects of US estate or gift tax; or foreign, state, or local tax. It does not discuss the special treatment under US federal income tax laws that could result if we invested in tax-exempt securities or certain other investment assets.
A US shareholder is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is for US federal income tax purposes:
| a citizen or individual resident of the United States; |
| a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for US federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the US or any state thereof or the District of Columbia; or |
| a trust or an estate, the income of which is subject to US federal income taxation regardless of its source. |
A non-US shareholder is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is not a US shareholder.
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership for US federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A prospective shareholder that is a partner of a partnership holding shares of our common stock should consult its tax advisors with respect to the purchase, ownership, and disposition of shares of our common stock.
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an investor of an investment in our shares will depend on the facts of his, her, or its particular situation. We encourage investors to consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific consequences of such an investment, including tax reporting requirements, the applicability of federal, state, local, and foreign tax laws, eligibility for the benefits of any applicable tax treaty and the effect of any possible changes in the tax laws.
Election to be Taxed as a RIC
As a business development company, we have elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our shareholders as dividends. To qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In addition, to obtain RIC tax treatment we must distribute to our shareholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses, or the Annual Distribution Requirement.
Taxation as a RIC
If we:
| qualify as a RIC; and |
| satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement; |
then we will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable income and net capital gain ( i.e. , net long-term capital gains in excess of net short-term capital losses) we distribute to shareholders. We will be subject to US federal income tax at the regular corporate rates on any income or capital gain not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our shareholders.
We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on certain undistributed income of RICs unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98% of our capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year, and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in preceding years, or the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement. We currently intend to make sufficient distributions each taxable year to satisfy the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement.
11
Table of Contents
In order to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:
| qualify to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year; |
| derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities, and net income derived from interests in qualified publicly traded partnerships (i.e., partnerships that are traded on an established securities market or tradable on a secondary market, other than partnerships that derive 90% of their income from interest, dividends, capital gains, and other traditional permitted mutual fund income) or the 90% Income Test; and |
| diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year: |
| at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, US Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and |
| no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities, other than US Government securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer or of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or in the securities of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships, or the Diversification Tests. |
We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. Because any original issue discount accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our shareholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount.
Gain or loss realized by us from warrants acquired by us as well as any loss attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally will be treated as capital gain or loss. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term or short-term, depending on how long we held a particular warrant.
We are authorized to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, we are not permitted to make distributions to our shareholders while our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding unless certain asset coverage tests are met. See RegulationSenior Securities. Moreover, our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of our portfolio and/or (2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC, including the diversification tests. If we dispose of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement, we may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.
If we fail to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement or otherwise fail to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we will be subject to tax in that year on all of our taxable income, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our shareholders. In that case, all of our income will be subject to corporate-level federal income tax, reducing the amount available to be distributed to our shareholders. In contrast, assuming we qualify as a RIC, our corporate-level federal income tax should be substantially reduced or eliminated. See Election to be Taxed as a RIC above.
The remainder of this discussion assumes that we qualify as a RIC and have satisfied the Annual Distribution Requirement.
Taxation of US Shareholders
Distributions by us generally are taxable to US shareholders as ordinary income or capital gains. Distributions of our investment company taxable income (which is, generally, our ordinary income plus realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary income to US shareholders to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. To the extent such distributions paid by us to non-corporate shareholders (including individuals) are attributable to dividends from US corporations and certain qualified foreign corporations, such distributions generally will be eligible for a maximum tax rate of 15% for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011. In this regard, it is anticipated that distributions paid by us will generally not be attributable to dividends and, therefore, generally will not qualify for the 15% maximum rate. Distributions of our net capital gains (which is generally our realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) properly designated by us as capital gain dividends will be taxable to a US shareholder as long-term capital gains (currently at a maximum rate of 15% in the case of individuals, trusts, or estates), regardless of the US shareholders holding period for his, her, or its common stock, and regardless of whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits first will reduce a US shareholders adjusted tax basis in such shareholders common stock and, after the adjusted basis is reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such US shareholder.
12
Table of Contents
Although we currently intend to distribute any long-term capital gains at least annually, we may in the future decide to retain some or all of our long-term capital gains, but designate the retained amount as a deemed distribution. In that case, among other consequences, we will pay tax on the retained amount, each US shareholder will be required to include his, her, or its share of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to the US shareholder, and the US shareholder will be entitled to claim a credit equal to his, her, or its allocable share of the tax paid thereon by us. The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax will be added to the US shareholders tax basis for his, her, or its common stock. Since we expect to pay tax on any retained capital gains at our regular corporate tax rate, and since that rate is in excess of the maximum rate currently payable by individuals on long-term capital gains, the amount of tax that individual shareholders will be treated as having paid and for which they will receive a credit will exceed the tax they owe on the retained net capital gain. Such excess generally may be claimed as a credit against the US shareholders other federal income tax obligations or may be refunded to the extent it exceeds a shareholders liability for federal income tax. A shareholder that is not subject to federal income tax or otherwise required to file a federal income tax return would be required to file a federal income tax return on the appropriate form in order to claim a refund for the taxes we paid. In order to utilize the deemed distribution approach, we must provide written notice to our shareholders prior to the expiration of 60 days after the close of the relevant taxable year. We cannot treat any of our investment company taxable income as a deemed distribution.
For purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and (2) the amount of capital gain dividends paid for that year, we may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a dividend that is paid during the following taxable year as if it had been paid during the taxable year in question. If we make such an election, the US shareholder will still be treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which the distribution is made. However, any dividend declared by us in October, November, or December of any calendar year, payable to shareholders of record on a specified date in such a month and actually paid during January of the following year, will be treated as if it had been received by our US shareholders on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
If an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly before the record date of a distribution, the price of the shares will include the value of the distribution and the investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even though it represents a return of his, her, or its investment.
A shareholder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss if the shareholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her or its shares of our common stock. Any gain arising from such sale or disposition generally will be treated as capital gain or loss if the shareholder has held his, her or its shares for more than one year. Otherwise, it would be classified as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss arising from the sale or disposition of shares of our common stock held for six months or less will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain dividends received, or undistributed capital gain deemed received, with respect to such shares. In addition, all or a portion of any loss recognized upon a disposition of shares of our common stock may be disallowed if other shares of our common stock are purchased (whether through reinvestment of distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after the disposition.
In general, individual and other non-corporate US shareholders currently are subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 15% on their net capital gain, i.e., the excess of realized net long-term capital gain over realized net short-term capital loss for a taxable year, including a long-term capital gain derived from an investment in our shares. Such rate is lower than the maximum rate on ordinary income currently payable by individuals. Corporate US shareholders currently are subject to federal income tax on net capital gain at the maximum 35% rate also applied to ordinary income. Non-corporate shareholders with net capital losses for a year (i.e., capital losses in excess of capital gains) generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses against their ordinary income each year; any net capital losses of a non-corporate shareholder in excess of $3,000 generally may be carried forward and used in subsequent years as provided in the Code. Corporate shareholders generally may not deduct any net capital losses against ordinary income for a year, but may carryback such losses for three years or carry forward such losses for five years.
We will send to each of our US shareholders, as promptly as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice detailing, on a per share basis, the amounts includible in such US shareholders taxable income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital gain. In addition, the federal tax status of each years distributions generally will be reported to the IRS (including the amount of dividends, if any, eligible for the 15% maximum rate). Distributions may also be subject to additional state, local, and foreign taxes depending on a US shareholders particular situation. Dividends distributed by us generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction or the 15% maximum rate applicable to qualifying dividends.
We may be required to withhold federal income tax (backup withholding) currently at a rate of 28% from all taxable distributions to any non-corporate US shareholder (1) who fails to furnish us with a correct taxpayer identification number or a certificate that such shareholder is exempt from backup withholding, or (2) with respect to whom the IRS notifies us that such shareholder has failed to properly report certain interest and dividend income to the IRS and to respond to notices to that effect. An
13
Table of Contents
individuals taxpayer identification number is his or her social security number. Any amount withheld under backup withholding is allowed as a credit against the US shareholders federal income tax liability and may entitle such shareholder to a refund, provided that proper information is timely provided to the IRS.
Taxation of Non-US Shareholders
Whether an investment in our common stock is appropriate for a non-US shareholder will depend upon that persons particular circumstances. An investment in our common stock by a non-US shareholder may have adverse tax consequences. Non-US shareholders should consult their tax advisers before investing in our common stock.
Dividends paid by us to non-US shareholders are generally subject to withholding at a 30% rate or a reduced rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty to the extent derived from investment income and short-term capital gains. In order to obtain a reduced rate of withholding, a non-US shareholder will be required to provide an IRS Form W-8BEN certifying its entitlement to benefits under a treaty. The withholding tax does not apply to regular dividends paid to a non-US shareholder who provides a Form W-8ECI, certifying that the dividends are effectively connected with the non-US shareholders conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Instead, the effectively connected dividends will be subject to regular US income tax as if the non-US shareholder were a US shareholder. A non-US corporation receiving effectively connected dividends may also be subject to additional branch profits tax imposed at a rate of 30% (or lower treaty rate). A non-US shareholder who fails to provide an IRS Form W-8BEN or other applicable form may be subject to backup withholding at the appropriate rate.
In general, US federal withholding tax will not apply to any gain or income realized by a non-US shareholder in respect of any distributions of net long-term capital gains over net short-term capital losses, exempt-interest dividends, or upon the sale or other disposition of shares of our common stock.
For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2008, properly-designated dividends are generally exempt from US federal withholding tax where they (i) are paid in respect of our qualified net interest income (generally, our US source interest income, other than certain contingent interest and interest from obligations of a corporation or partnership in which we are at least a 10% shareholder, reduced by expenses that are allocable to such income) or (ii) are paid in respect of our qualified short-term capital gains (generally, the excess of our net short-term capital gain over our long-term capital loss for such taxable year). However, depending on our circumstances, we may designate all, some or none of its potentially eligible dividends as such qualified net interest income or as qualified short-term capital gains, and/or treat such dividends, in whole or in part, as ineligible for this exemption from withholding. In order to qualify for this exemption from withholding, a non-US shareholder will need to comply with applicable certification requirements relating to its non-US status (including, in general, furnishing an IRS Form W-8BEN or substitute Form). In the case of shares held through an intermediary, the intermediary may withhold even if we designate the payment as qualified net interest income or qualified short-term capital gain. Non-US shareholders should contact their intermediaries with respect to the application of these rules to their accounts.
Non-US persons should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the US federal income tax and withholding tax, and state, local, and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the shares.
Failure to Qualify as a RIC
If we were unable to qualify for treatment as a RIC, we would be subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to shareholders, nor would they be required to be made. Distributions would generally be taxable to our shareholders as ordinary dividend income eligible for the 15% maximum rate for taxable years beginning before 2011 to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the shareholders tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
Regulation under the 1940 Act
We have elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between business development companies and their affiliates (including any investment advisers or sub-advisers), principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters, and requires that a majority of the directors be persons other than interested persons, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a business development company unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities voting as a class.
14
Table of Contents
Qualifying Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a business development company may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the companys total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are the following:
(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:
(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the US;
(b) is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the business development company) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
(c) satisfies any of the following:
| does not have any class of securities listed on a national securities exchange; |
| is controlled by a business development company or a group of companies including a business development company and the business development company has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company; or |
| is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2 million. |
(2) Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we control.
(3) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from a US issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.
(4) Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own at least 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
(5) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.
(6) Cash, cash equivalents, US Government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.
(7) Securities issued by a company that met the definition of eligible portfolio company at the time of our initial investment but subsequently does not meet the definition because the company no longer meets the definition set forth above.
Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In addition, a business development company must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the .US and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2), or (3) above. However, in order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, the business development company must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance; except that, where the business development company purchases such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the business development company, through its directors, officers, or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations, or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.
Temporary Investments
Pending investment in other types of qualifying assets, as described above, our investments may consist of cash equivalents, US government securities, or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. Typically, we will invest in US Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the US government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements.
15
Table of Contents
Senior Securities
We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our shareholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without regard to full asset coverage requirements. In addition to the 1940 Act, we are subject to two exemptive orders which govern how we calculate our senior securities. For a discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Business and StructureRegulations governing our operation as a business development company will affect our ability to, and the way in which we, raise additional capital.
Regulation by the SBA
Medallion Funding, Medallion Capital, and Freshstart each operate as Small Business Investment Companies, or SBICs. The SBIA authorizes the organization of SBICs as vehicles for providing equity capital, long term financing, and management assistance to small business concerns. The SBIA and the SBA regulations define a small business concern as a business that is independently owned and operated, which does not dominate its field of operation, and which (i) has a net worth, together with any affiliates, of $18.0 million or less and average annual net income after US federal income taxes for the preceding two years of $6.0 million or less (average annual net income is computed without the benefit of any carryover loss), or (ii) satisfies alternative criteria under SBA regulations that focus on the industry in which the business is engaged and the number of persons employed by the business or its gross revenues. In addition, at the end of each year, at least 20% of the total amount of loans made after April 25, 1994 must be made in smaller businesses which have a net worth of $6.0 million or less, and average net income after federal income taxes for the preceding two years of $2.0 million or less. SBA regulations also prohibit an SBIC from providing funds to a small business concern for certain purposes, such as relending and reinvestment.
Medallion Funding is authorized to make loans to borrowers other than disadvantaged businesses (that is, businesses that are at least 50% owned, and controlled, and managed, on a day to day basis, by a person or persons whose participation in the free enterprise system is hampered because of social or economic disadvantage) if, at the time of the loan, Medallion Funding has in its portfolio outstanding loans to disadvantaged businesses with an aggregate cost basis equal to or exceeding the value of the unamortized repurchase discount under the preferred stock repurchase agreement between Medallion Funding and the SBA, which is currently zero.
Under current SBA Regulations, the maximum rate of interest that Medallion Funding may charge may not exceed the higher of (i) 19% or (ii) the sum of (a) the higher of (i) that companys weighted average cost of qualified borrowings, as determined under SBA Regulations, or (ii) the current SBA debenture rate, plus (b) 11%, rounded to the next lower eighth of one percent. As of December 31, 2006, the maximum rate of interest permitted on loans originated by the Medallion Funding, Medallion Capital, and Freshstart was 19%. As of December 31, 2006, our outstanding medallion loans had a weighted average rate of interest 6.93% and our outstanding commercial loans had a weighted average rate of interest of 12.21%. Current SBA regulations also require that each loan originated by an SBIC have a term of between one and 20 years; loans to disadvantaged businesses also may be for a minimum term of one year.
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their capital stock, to retire their SBA debentures, and to lend money to their officers, directors, and employees, or invest in affiliates thereof. The SBA also prohibits, without prior SBA approval, a change of control or transfers which would result in any person (or group of persons acting in concert) owning 10% or more of any class of capital stock of an SBIC. A change of control is any event which would result in the transfer of the power, direct or indirect, to direct the management and policies of an SBIC, whether through ownership, contractual arrangements, or otherwise.
Under SBA Regulations, without prior SBA approval, loans by licensees with outstanding SBA leverage to any single small business concern may not exceed 20% of an SBICs regulatory capital, as defined. Under the terms of the respective conversion agreements with the SBA, however, Medallion Funding is authorized to make loans to disadvantaged borrowers in amounts not exceeding 30% of its respective regulatory capital.
SBICs must invest idle funds that are not being used to make loans in investments permitted under SBA regulations. These permitted investments include direct obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the government of the US with a term of 15 months or less and deposits maturing in one year or less issued by an institution insured by the FDIC. These permitted investments must be maintained in (i) direct obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the US, which mature within 15 months from the date of the investment; (ii) repurchase agreements with federally insured institutions with a maturity of seven days or less if the securities underlying the repurchase agreements are direct obligations of, or obligations
16
Table of Contents
guaranteed as to principal and interest by the US, and such securities must be maintained in a custodial account in a federally insured institution; (iii) certificates of deposit with a maturity of one year or less, issued by a federally insured institution; (iv) a deposit account in a federally insured institution, subject to withdrawal restriction of one year or less; (v) a checking account in a federally insured institution; or (vi) a reasonable petty cash fund.
SBICs may purchase voting securities of small business concerns in accordance with SBA regulations. Although prior regulations prohibited an SBIC from controlling a small business concern except in limited circumstances, new regulations adopted by the SBA on October 22, 2002 (pursuant to Public Law 106-554) now allow an SBIC to exercise control over a small business for a period of seven years from the date on which the SBIC initially acquires its control position. This control period may be extended for an additional period of time with the SBAs prior written approval.
Regulation of Medallion Bank as an Industrial Bank
In May 2002, we formed Medallion Bank, which received approval from the FDIC for federal deposit insurance in October 2003. Medallion Bank, a Utah-chartered industrial bank, is a depository institution subject to regulatory oversight and examination by both the FDIC and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions. Under its banking charter, Medallion Bank is empowered to make consumer and commercial loans, and may accept all FDIC-insured deposits other than demand deposits (checking accounts). The creation of Medallion Bank allows us to apply stable and low-cost bank deposit funding for key lending business activities throughout our business.
Medallion Bank is subject to certain federal laws that restrict and control its ability to extend credit and provide or receive services between affiliates. In addition, the FDIC has regulatory authority to prohibit Medallion Bank from engaging in any unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business.
Medallion Bank is further subject to capital adequacy guidelines issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, or the FFIEC. These guidelines make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banking organizations and consider off-balance sheet exposures in determining capital adequacy. Under the rules and regulations of the FFIEC, at least half of a banks total capital is required to be Tier I capital, comprised of common equity, retained earnings and a limited amount of non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock. The remaining capital, Tier II capital, may consist of other preferred stock, certain hybrid debt/equity instruments, a limited amount of term-subordinated debt, or a limited amount of the reserve for possible credit losses. The FFIEC has also adopted minimum leverage ratios for banks, which are calculated by dividing Tier I capital by total average assets. Recognizing that the risk-based capital standards address only credit risk, and not interest rate, liquidity, operational, or other risks, many banks are expected to maintain capital in excess of the minimum standards.
In addition, pursuant to provisions of the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, or FDICIA, and related regulations with respect to prompt corrective action, FDIC-insured institutions such as Medallion Bank may only accept brokered deposits without FDIC permission if they meet specified capital standards, and are subject to restrictions with respect to the interest they may pay on deposits unless they are well-capitalized. To be well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions, a bank must have a ratio of combined Tier I and Tier II capital to risk-weighted assets of not less than 10%, Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of not less than 6%, and a Tier I to average assets of not less than 5%.
We, the FDIC, and Medallion Bank have agreed that the capital levels of Medallion Bank will at all times meet or exceed the levels required for Medallion Bank to be considered well-capitalized under the FDIC rules and regulations, that Medallion Banks Tier I capital to total assets ratio will be maintained at not less than 15%, and that Medallion Bank will maintain an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses.
Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and applicable regulations also impose restrictions on Medallion Bank. These restrictions limit the transfer of funds by a depository institution to certain of its affiliates, including us, in the form of loans, extensions of credit, investments, or purchases of assets. Sections 23A and 23B also require generally that the depository institutions transactions with its affiliates be on terms no less favorable to Medallion Bank than comparable transactions with unrelated third parties.
The USA Patriot Act and the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001, or the Patriot Act, was enacted on October 26, 2001, and is intended to detect and prosecute terrorism and international money laundering. The Patriot Act establishes new standards for verifying customer identification incidental to the opening of new accounts. Medallion Bank has undertaken appropriate measures to comply with the Patriot Act and associated regulations. Other provisions of the Patriot Act provide for special information sharing procedures governing communications with the government and other financial institutions with respect to suspected terrorists and money laundering activity, and enhancements to suspicious activity reporting, including electronic filing of suspicious activity reports over a secure filing network.
17
Table of Contents
Other
We may also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our board of directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC.
We will be periodically examined by the SEC for compliance with the 1940 Act.
We are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a business development company, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to us or our shareholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such persons office.
We have adopted and implemented written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws, and intend to review these policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation. We have designated a chief compliance officer to be responsible for administering our policies and procedures.
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and NASDAQ Corporate Governance Regulations
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, imposes a wide variety of regulatory requirements on publicly-held companies and their insiders. Many of these requirements affect us. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act has required us to review our policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the new regulations promulgated thereunder. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all future regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
In addition, NASDAQ has adopted or is in the process of adopting corporate governance changes to its listing standards. We believe we are in compliance with such corporate governance listing standards. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all future listing standards and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our corporate website is located at www.medallion.com. We make copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendment to those reports filed with or furnished to the SEC available to investors on or through our website free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the SEC. Our SEC filings can be found in the For Investors section of our website, the address of which is http://www.medallion.com/investors.htm. Our Code of Ethical Conduct and Insider Trading Policy can be located in the Corporate Governance section of our website at http://www.medallion.com/investors_governance.htm. These documents, as well as our SEC filings are available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy from our Secretary.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure
Based on discussions with the SEC, we have determined that we should no longer consolidate Medallion Banks accounts with those of our own.
Since the inception of Medallion Bank, we have historically consolidated the financial position and results of operations of Medallion Bank with those of our own. We did so in reliance upon a letter from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, permitting such consolidation. During August 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form N-2 which the SEC staff reviewed and on which they provided comments, including the appropriateness of consolidating the accounts of Medallion Bank. Based on several discussions with the SEC, our management, audit committee, and board have determined, and our auditors have concurred, that we should no longer consolidate Medallion Bank in reliance upon the SEC letter, and have determined, and our auditors have concurred, that this change represents a change in the reporting entity as described in SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. Accordingly we have adopted the retrospective treatment provided for in that statement, including for any interim periods presented. Based on the available facts, and after due investigation, we believe we relied upon the no-action letter in good faith and with a reasonable basis for such reliance and we have articulated these facts to the SEC. After reviewing our response, the SEC has indicated it has no further comments to the response, but they have not formally concurred with our conclusion. We cannot assure you that the SEC or any other regulatory agency may not come to a different conclusion than ours.
We have a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.
Management has identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2006 relating the documentation and oversight of the monitoring of certain loans and/or investments included in the portfolio of one of our subsidiaries, Medallion Capital. Although we are taking corrective action, we have not yet completed our remediation of the material weakness. See Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. Although we believe that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP, we cannot assure you that additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future. Our failure to remediate this material weakness could cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual auditor reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated under Section 404.
18
Table of Contents
We are dependent upon our key investment personnel for our future success.
We depend on the diligence, skill, and network of business contacts of the investment professionals we employ for sourcing, evaluating, negotiating, structuring, and monitoring our investments. Our future success will also depend, to a significant extent, on the continued service and coordination of our senior management team, particularly, Alvin Murstein, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Andrew M. Murstein, our President, and Larry D. Hall, our Chief Financial Officer. The departure of Messrs. Murstein or Mr. Hall, or any member of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.
We operate in a highly regulated environment which may constrain our ability to grow our business.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of business development companies. For example, business development companies are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets in qualifying assets primarily in securities of eligible portfolio companies (as defined under the 1940 Act), cash, cash equivalents, US government securities, and other high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Our regulatory requirements may hinder our ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve our investment objective. In addition, we rely upon several exemptive orders from the SEC permitting us to consolidate our financial reporting and operate our business as presently conducted. Our failure to satisfy the conditions set forth in those exemptive orders could result in our inability to rely upon such orders or to cause the SEC to revoke the orders which could result in material changes in our financial reporting or the way in which we conduct our business. Furthermore, any failure to comply with the requirements imposed on business development companies by the 1940 Act could cause the SEC to bring an enforcement action against us. If we do not remain a business development company, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would further decrease our operating flexibility.
Regulations governing our operation as a business development company will affect our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital.
Our business may periodically require capital. We may acquire additional capital from the following sources:
Senior Securities and Other Indebtedness. We may issue debt securities or preferred stock, and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as senior securities, up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. If we issue senior securities, including debt or preferred stock, we will be exposed to additional risks, including the following:
| Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business development company, to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our debt at a time when such sales and/or repayments may be disadvantageous. |
| Any amounts that we use to service our debt or make payments on preferred stock will not be available for dividends to our common shareholders. |
| It is likely that any senior securities or other indebtedness we issue will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. Additionally, some of these securities or other indebtedness may be rated by rating agencies, and in obtaining a rating for such securities and other indebtedness, we may be required to abide by operating and investment guidelines that further restrict operating and financial flexibility. |
| We and, indirectly, our shareholders will bear the cost of issuing and servicing such securities and other indebtedness. |
| Preferred stock or any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences, and privileges more favorable than those of our common stock, including separate voting rights, and could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control to the detriment of the holders of our common stock. |
Additional Common Stock. We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, warrants, options, or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock if our board of directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and that of our shareholders, and our shareholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). We may also make rights offerings to our shareholders at prices per share less than the
19
Table of Contents
net asset value per share, subject to applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. If we raise additional funds by issuing more common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, the percentage ownership of our shareholders at that time would decrease and they may experience dilution. Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on favorable terms or at all.
If our primary investments are deemed not to be qualifying assets, we could be deemed to be in violation of the 1940 Act.
In order to maintain our status as a business development company, we must not acquire any assets other than qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets.
At the end of each fiscal quarter, we typically take proactive steps to prospectively preserve investment flexibility in the next quarter which is assessed against our total assets at our most recent quarter end. We can accomplish this in many ways including purchasing US Treasury bills or other investment-grade debt securities, and closing out our position on a net cash basis subsequent to quarter end. We may also utilize repurchase agreements or other balance sheet transactions as we deem appropriate for this purpose and these amounts are excluded from total assets for purposes of computing the assets upon which qualifying asset test is determined. However, if such proactive measures are ineffective and our primary investments are deemed not to be qualifying assets, we could be deemed in violation of the 1940 Act, which could have a material effect on our business.
We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to qualify as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code.
To obtain and maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code, we must meet the following annual distribution, income source, and asset diversification requirements.
| The annual distribution requirement for a RIC will be satisfied if we distribute to our shareholders on an annual basis at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Because we use debt financing, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we could fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax. |
| The income source requirement will be satisfied if we obtain at least 90% of our income for each year from dividends, interest, gains from the sale of stock or securities or similar sources. |
| The asset diversification requirement will be satisfied if we meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each quarter of our taxable year. Failure to meet those requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and therefore will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses. |
If we do not qualify as a RIC for more than two consecutive years, and then seek to requalify and elect RIC status, we would be required to recognize gain to the extent of any unrealized appreciation on our assets unless we make a special election to pay corporate-level tax on any such unrealized appreciation recognized during the succeeding 10-year period. Absent such special election, any gain we recognize would be deemed distributed to our shareholders as a taxable distribution.
If we fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment for any reason and are subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. In addition, the asset coverage and distribution requirements impose significant cash flow management restrictions on us and limit our ability to retain earnings to cover periods of loss, provide for future growth, and pay for extraordinary items. Additionally, we could fail to satisfy the requirement that a RIC derive at least 90% of its gross income from qualifying sources, with the result that we would not qualify as a RIC. Qualification as a RIC is made on an annual basis and, although we and some of our subsidiaries have qualified in the past, we cannot assure you that we will qualify for such treatment in the future.
20
Table of Contents
We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we will include in taxable income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the origination of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or contractual payment-in-kind interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original issue discount or increases in loan balances as a result of contractual payment-in-kind arrangements will be included in income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash.
Since, in certain cases, we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the annual distribution requirement necessary to obtain and maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital, or reduce new investment originations for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.
Our Small Business Investment Company subsidiaries may be unable to meet the investment company requirements, which could result in the imposition of an entity-level tax.
Some of our subsidiaries are subject to the Small Business Investment Act, or SBIA. Our Small Business Investment Company, or SBIC, subsidiaries that are also RICs are prohibited by the SBIA from making the distributions necessary to qualify as a RIC. Each year, in order to comply with the SBA regulations and the RIC distribution requirements, we must request and receive a waiver of the SBAs restrictions. While the current policy of the SBAs Office of SBIC Operations is to grant such waivers if the SBIC makes certain offsetting adjustments to its paid-in capital and surplus accounts, we cannot assure you that this will continue to be the SBAs policy or that our subsidiaries will have adequate capital to make the required adjustments. If our subsidiaries are unable to obtain a waiver, compliance with the SBA regulations may result in loss of RIC status and a consequent imposition of an entity-level tax.
The Codes diversification requirements may limit our ability to expand our business.
To qualify as a RIC, not more than 25% of the value of our total assets may be invested in the securities, other than US government securities or securities of other RICs, of any one issuer. As of December 31, 2006, our two largest investments subject to this test were our investments in Medallion Bank, representing 22% of our RIC assets, and our investment in Medallion Business Credit, representing 5% of our RIC assets. We will continue to monitor the levels of these and any other investment concentrations in conjunction with the diversification tests.
We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
We compete for investments with other business development companies and other investment funds as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and credit unions. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments. These characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships, and offer better pricing and more flexible structuring than us. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors pricing, terms, and structure. If we are forced to match our competitors pricing, terms, and structure, we may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company.
We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time.
21
Table of Contents
We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested, and may increase the risk of investing in us.
Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested, and therefore increase the risk associated with investing in us. We borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks and other lenders, and through long-term subordinated SBA debentures. These creditors have fixed dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could reduce the amount available for common stock dividend payments.
As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately $455,136,000 of outstanding indebtedness, which had a weighted average borrowing cost of 5.69% at December 31, 2006, and our wholly-owned unconsolidated portfolio companies, primarily Medallion Bank, had $261,484,000 of outstanding indebtedness at a weighted average borrowing cost of 4.36%.
Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment income.
Because we borrow to fund our investments, a portion of our income is dependent upon the difference between the interest rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate at which we invest these funds. A portion of our investments, such as taxi medallion loans, will have fixed interest rates, while a portion of our borrowings will likely have floating interest rates. As a result, a significant change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds could increase, which would reduce our net investment income. We may hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments, subject to applicable legal requirements. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Also, we will have to rely on our counterparties to perform their obligations under such hedges.
We depend on cash flow from our subsidiaries to make dividend payments and other distributions to our shareholders.
We are primarily a holding company, and we derive most of our operating income and cash flow from our subsidiaries. As a result, we rely heavily upon distributions from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to make dividend payments and other distributions to our shareholders. Funds are provided to us by our subsidiaries through dividends and payments on intercompany indebtedness, but we cannot assure you that our subsidiaries will be in a position to continue to make these dividend or debt payments. Furthermore, as a condition of its approval by its regulators, Medallion Bank was precluded from making any dividend payments for its first three years of operations.
Medallion Banks use of brokered deposit sources for its deposit-gathering activities may not be available when needed.
Medallion Bank relies on the established brokered deposit market to originate deposits to fund its operations. While Medallion Bank has developed contractual relationships with a diversified group of investment brokers, and the brokered deposit market is well developed and utilized by many banking institutions, conditions could change that might affect the availability of deposits. If the capital levels at Medallion Bank fall below the well-capitalized level, or if Medallion Bank experiences a period of sustained operating losses, the cost of attracting deposits from the brokered deposit market could increase significantly, and the ability of Medallion Bank to raise deposits from this source could be impaired. Medallion Banks ability to manage its growth to stay within the well-capitalized level, and the capital level currently required by the FDIC during Medallion Banks first three years of operation, which is also considerably higher than the level required to be classified as well-capitalized, is critical to Medallion Banks retaining open access to this funding source.
A decrease in prevailing interest rates may lead to more loan prepayments, which could adversely affect our business.
Our borrowers generally have the right to prepay their loans upon payment of a fee ranging from 30 to 120 days interest for standard commodity loans, and for higher amounts, as negotiated, for larger more custom loan arrangements. A borrower is likely to
22
Table of Contents
exercise prepayment rights at a time when the interest rate payable on the borrowers loan is high relative to prevailing interest rates. In a lower interest rate environment, we will have difficulty re-lending prepaid funds at comparable rates, which may reduce the net interest income that we receive. When this occurs, we will generally reinvest these proceeds in temporary investments, pending their future investment in new portfolio companies. These temporary investments will typically have substantially lower yields than the debt being prepaid and we could experience significant delays in reinvesting these amounts. Any future investment in a new portfolio company may also be at lower yields than the debt that was repaid. As a result, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if a substantial number of our portfolio companies elect to prepay amounts owed to us and we are not able to reinvest the proceeds for comparable yields in a timely fashion. Additionally, prepayments could negatively impact our return on equity, which could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.
Our investment portfolio is, and will continue to be, recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our management and approved by our board of directors and, as a result, there is, and will continue to be, uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.
Under the 1940 Act, we are required to carry our portfolio investments at market value or, if there is no readily available market value, at fair value as determined by our management and approved by our board of directors. Unlike other lending institutions, we are not permitted to maintain a general reserve for anticipated losses. Instead, we are required by the 1940 Act to specifically value each individual investment and record an unrealized gain or loss for any asset we believe has increased or decreased in value. Typically, there is not a public market for most of the investments in which we have invested and will generally continue to invest. As a result, we value our investments on a quarterly basis based on a determination of their fair value made in good faith and in accordance with the written guidelines approved by our board of directors. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair value pricing of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys earnings and its ability to make payments on its indebtedness, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow, and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. As a result, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such securities. Considering these factors, we have determined that the fair value of our portfolio is below its cost basis. As of December 31, 2006, our net unrealized depreciation on investments was approximately $942,850 or 0.16% of our investment portfolio.
The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.
We generally make investments in private companies. Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded our investments. We may also face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we have material non-public information regarding such portfolio company.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including our ability to make investments in companies that meet our investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the debt securities we acquire, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets, and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect any market for our common stock, impact the businesses in which we invest, and harm our operations and profitability.
Terrorist attacks may harm our results of operations and your investment. We cannot assure you that there will not be further terrorist attacks against the US or US businesses. Such attacks or armed conflicts in the US or elsewhere may impact the businesses in which we invest directly or indirectly, by undermining economic conditions in the United States. In addition, a substantial portion of our business is focused in the New York City metropolitan area, which suffered a terrorist attack in 2001. Another terrorist attack in New York City could severely impact our results of operations. Losses resulting from terrorist attacks are generally uninsurable.
23
Table of Contents
Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to manage growth effectively.
Our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on our ability to grow, which will depend, in turn, on our management teams ability to identify, evaluate and monitor, and our ability to finance and invest in, companies that meet our investment criteria.
Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis will be largely a function of our management teams handling of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive, and efficient services, and our access to financing on acceptable terms. In addition to monitoring the performance of our existing investments, members of our management team and our investment professionals may also be called upon to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. These demands on their time may distract them or slow the rate of investment. In order to grow, we will need to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. However, we cannot assure you that any such employees will contribute to the success of our business. Any failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Acquisitions may lead to difficulties that could adversely affect our operations.
By their nature, corporate acquisitions entail certain risks, including those relating to undisclosed liabilities, the entry into new markets, operational, and personnel matters. We may have difficulty integrating acquired operations or managing problems due to sudden increases in the size of our loan portfolio. In such instances, we might be required to modify our operating systems and procedures, hire additional staff, obtain and integrate new equipment, and complete other tasks appropriate for the assimilation of new business activities. We cannot assure you that we would be successful, if and when necessary, in minimizing these inherent risks or in establishing systems and procedures which will enable us to effectively achieve our desired results in respect of any future acquisitions.
Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.
The 1940 Act restricts our ability to knowingly participate in certain transactions with our affiliates. These restrictions limit our ability to buy or sell any security from or to our affiliates, or engage in joint transactions with our affiliates, which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times). With respect to controlling or certain closely affiliated persons, we will generally be prohibited from engaging in such transactions absent the prior approval of the SEC. With respect to other affiliated persons, we may engage in such transactions only with the prior approval of our independent directors.
Our board of directors may change our operating policies and strategies without prior notice or shareholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse.
Our board of directors has the authority to modify or waive our current operating policies and strategies without prior notice and without shareholder approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies and strategies would have on our business, operating results, and value of our stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay you dividends and cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to Our Investments
Lending to small businesses involves a high degree of risk and is highly speculative.
Lending to small businesses involves a high degree of business and financial risk, which can result in substantial losses and should be considered speculative. Our borrower base consists primarily of small business owners that may have limited resources and that are generally unable to obtain financing from traditional sources. There is generally no publicly available information about these small business owners, and we must rely on the diligence of our employees and agents to obtain information in connection with our credit decisions. In addition, these small businesses often do not have audited financial statements. Some smaller businesses have narrower product lines and market shares than their competition. Therefore, they may be more vulnerable to customer preferences, market conditions, or economic downturns, which may adversely affect the return on, or the recovery of, our investment in these businesses.
24
Table of Contents
Our portfolio is and may continue to be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies and industries, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations to us or by a downturn in the particular industry.
Our portfolio is and may continue to be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies and industries. As of December 31, 2006, investments in New York City taxi medallion loans represented approximately 63% of our managed taxi medallion loans. Beyond the asset diversification requirements associated with our qualification as a RIC, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and while we are not targeting any specific industries, our investments are, and could continue to be, concentrated in relatively few industries. As a result, the aggregate returns we realize may be adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Additionally, a downturn in any particular industry in which we are invested could also negatively impact the aggregate returns we realize.
If we are unable to continue to diversify geographically, our business may be adversely affected if the New York City taxicab industry experiences a sustained economic downturn.
Although we have diversified from the New York City area, a significant portion of our loan revenue is derived from New York City medallion loans collateralized by New York City taxicab medallions. An economic downturn in the New York City taxicab industry could lead to an increase in defaults on our medallion loans. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sufficiently diversify our operations geographically.
An economic downturn could result in certain of our commercial and consumer loan customers experiencing declines in business activities, which could lead to difficulties in their servicing of their loans with us, and increasing the level of delinquencies, defaults, and loan losses in our commercial loan and consumer loan portfolios.
Changes in taxicab industry regulations that result in the issuance of additional medallions could lead to a decrease in the value of our medallion loan collateral.
Every city in which we originate medallion loans, and most other major cities in the US, limits the supply of taxicab medallions. This regulation results in supply restrictions that support the value of medallions. Actions that loosen these restrictions and result in the issuance of additional medallions into a market could decrease the value of medallions in that market. If this were to occur, the value of the collateral securing our then outstanding medallion loans in that market could be adversely affected. We are unable to forecast with any degree of certainty whether any other potential increases in the supply of medallions will occur.
In New York City, Chicago, Boston, and in other markets where we originate medallion loans, taxicab fares are generally set by government agencies. Expenses associated with operating taxicabs are largely unregulated. As a result, the ability of taxicab operators to recoup increases in expenses is limited in the short term. Escalating expenses can render taxicab operations less profitable, could cause borrowers to default on loans from us, and could potentially adversely affect the value of our collateral.
A significant portion of our loan revenue is derived from loans collateralized by New York City taxicab medallions. According to New York City TLC data, over the past 20 years New York City taxicab medallions have appreciated in value from under $100,000 to $525,000 for corporate medallions and over $411,000 for individual medallions. However, for sustained periods during that time, taxicab medallions have declined in value. Since December 31, 2005, the value of New York City taxicab medallions increased by approximately 17% for individual medallions and 34% for corporate medallions.
Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.
We invest primarily in senior secured loans, junior secured loans, and subordinated debt issued by small- to mid-sized companies. Our portfolio companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may entitle the holders to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments with respect to the debt instruments in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization, or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt instruments in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization, or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.
25
Table of Contents
There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.
Even though we may have structured most of our investments as senior loans, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt investment and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. We may also be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by us with respect to a borrowers business or instances where we exercise control over the borrower. It is possible that we could become subject to a lenders liability claim, including as a result of actions taken in rendering significant managerial assistance.
We may not control any of our portfolio companies.
We may not control any of our portfolio companies, even though we may have board representation or board observation rights, and our debt agreements may contain certain restrictive covenants. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the management of such company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests as debt investors.
Consumer lending is a new product line for Medallion Bank that carries a higher risk of loss and could be adversely affected by an economic downturn.
The acquisition of our consumer loan portfolio, and the subsequent commencement of lending operations in this line of business, represents an entry into the new market of consumer lending for us. Although the purchased portfolio was seasoned and Medallion Banks management has considerable experience in originating and managing consumer loans, we cannot assure you that these loans will perform at their historical levels as expected under Medallion Banks management.
By its nature, lending to consumers that have blemishes on their credit reports carries with it a higher risk of loss. Although the net interest margins should be higher to compensate us for this increased risk, an economic downturn could result in higher loss rates and lower returns than expected, and could affect the profitability of the consumer loan portfolio.
We may not realize gains from our equity investments.
Certain investments that we have made in the past and may make in the future include warrants or other equity securities. In addition, we may from time to time make non-control, equity co-investments in companies in conjunction with private equity sponsors. Our goal is ultimately to realize gains upon our disposition of such equity interests. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. We also may be unable to realize any value if a portfolio company does not have a liquidity event, such as a sale of the business, recapitalization or public offering, which would allow us to sell the underlying equity interests.
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES |
We lease approximately 17,000 square feet of office space in New York City for our corporate headquarters under a lease expiring in June 2016, and lease a facility in Long Island City, New York, of approximately 6,000 square feet for certain corporate back-office operations. We also lease office space for loan origination offices and subsidiaries operations in Boston, MA, Chicago, IL, Minneapolis, MN, and Flemington, NJ. Medallion Bank leases space in Salt Lake City, UT. We do not own any real property, other than foreclosed property obtained as a result of lending relationships. We believe that our leased properties, taken as a whole, are in good operating condition and are suitable for our current business operations.
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We and our subsidiaries are currently involved in various legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of our business, including collection matters with respect to certain loans. We intend to vigorously defend any outstanding claims and pursue our legal
26
Table of Contents
rights. In the opinion of our management and based upon the advice of legal counsel, there is no proceeding pending, or to the knowledge of management threatened, which in the event of an adverse decision would result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the 2006 fourth quarter.
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol TAXI. Our common stock commenced trading on May 23, 1996. As of March 27, 2007, there were approximately 119 holders of record of the Companys common stock.
On March 27, 2007, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $12.19 per share. Historically, our common stock has traded at a premium to net asset value per share, but there can be no assurance that our stock will trade at a premium in the future.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low closing prices for our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market.
DIVIDENDS DECLARED |
HIGH | LOW | |||||||
2006 |
|||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 12.52 | $ | 11.17 | |||
Third Quarter |
0.18 | 13.43 | 10.67 | ||||||
Second Quarter |
0.17 | 13.74 | 12.74 | ||||||
First Quarter |
0.16 | 13.55 | 11.12 | ||||||
2005 |
|||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 9.20 | |||
Third Quarter |
0.14 | 10.77 | 9.51 | ||||||
Second Quarter |
0.13 | 9.78 | 9.10 | ||||||
First Quarter |
0.12 | 9.80 | 8.92 |
Information about our equity compensation plan is incorporated by reference in all information under the caption Equity Compensation Plan Information included in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 18, 2007.
As a RIC, we intend to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to our shareholders. Distributions of our income are generally required to be made within the calendar year the income was earned as a RIC; however, in certain circumstances distributions can be made up to a full calendar year after the income has been earned. Investment company taxable income includes, among other things, interest, dividends, and capital gains reduced by deductible expenses. Our ability to make dividend payments as a RIC is restricted by certain asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act and has been dependent upon maintenance of our status as a RIC under the Code in the past, by SBA regulations, and under the terms of the SBA debentures. There can be no assurances, however, that we will have sufficient earnings to pay such dividends in the future.
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan pursuant to which shareholders may elect to have distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock. When we declare a dividend or distribution, all participants will have credited to their plan accounts the number of full and fractional shares (computed to three decimal places) that could be obtained with the cash, net of any applicable withholding taxes that would have been paid to them if they were not participants. The number of full and fractional shares is computed at the weighted average price of all shares of common stock purchased for plan participants within the 30 days after the dividend or distribution is declared plus brokerage commissions. The automatic reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions will not release plan participants of any income tax that may be payable on the dividend or capital gains distribution. Shareholders may terminate their participation in the dividend reinvestment plan by providing written notice to the Plan Agent at least 10 days before any given dividend payment date. Upon termination, we will issue to a shareholder both a certificate for the number of full shares of common stock owned and a check for any fractional shares, valued at the then current market price, less any applicable brokerage commissions and any other costs of sale. There are no additional fees or expenses for participation in the dividend reinvestment plan. Shareholders may obtain additional information about the dividend reinvestment plan by contacting the American Stock Transfer & Trust Company at 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY, 10038.
27
Table of Contents
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES (1)
Period |
Total Number of Shares |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Value) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||
November 5 through December 31, 2003 |
10,816 | $ | 9.20 | 10,816 | $ | 9,900,492 | ||||
January 1 through December 31, 2004 |
952,517 | 9.00 | 952,517 | 11,329,294 | ||||||
January 1 through December 31, 2005 |
389,900 | 9.26 | 389,900 | 7,720,523 | ||||||
January 1 through December 31, 2006 (2) |
| | | 7,720,523 | ||||||
Total |
1,353,233 | 9.07 | 1,353,233 | | ||||||
(1) | We publicly announced our Stock Repurchase Program in a press release dated November 5, 2003, after the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $10,000,000 of our outstanding common stock, which was increased by an additional $10,000,000 authorization on November 3, 2004. The stock repurchase program expires after a certain number of days, except in certain cases where it is extended through completion of the authorized amounts. In July 2006, we extended the terms of the Stock Repurchase Program. Purchases were to commence no earlier than August 2006, and were to conclude 180 days after the commencement of the purchases. |
(2) | There were no repurchases made during the 2006 fourth quarter. |
28
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Summary Consolidated Financial Data
You should read the consolidated financial information below with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002. Because of the change in the reporting entity described in note 3 to our consolidated financial statements, our financial condition and results of operations included in this annual report for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, including for any interim periods presented, have been adjusted to reflect the change retrospectively for all periods and information presented.
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands |
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Statement of operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 39,635 | $ | 34,811 | $ | 24,833 | $ | 26,205 | $ | 33,875 | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
24,190 | 17,997 | 12,834 | 12,042 | 20,243 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
15,445 | 16,814 | 11,999 | 14,163 | 13,632 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
2,646 | 4,738 | 4,334 | 4,457 | 6,121 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
14,926 | 16,984 | 16,083 | 16,238 | 27,565 | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) before income taxes |
3,165 | 4,568 | 250 | 2,382 | (7,812 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit |
| 14 | (259 | ) | (41 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) after income taxes (1) |
3,165 | 4,582 | (9 | ) | 2,341 | (7,897 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net realized gains (losses) on investments |
3,080 | 3,606 | 2,329 | 11,527 | (6,335 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Equity in net income of Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries (2) |
7,454 | 5,012 | 343 | (4,860 | ) | (4,794 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments (2) |
(591 | ) | (6,339 | ) | 19,849 | (6,990 | ) | 6,414 | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations (3) |
$ | 13,108 | $ | 6,861 | $ | 22,512 | $ | 2,018 | ($ | 12,612 | ) | |||||||||
Per share data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) (1) |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.13 | ($ | 0.44 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit |
| | (0.01 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Net realized gains (losses) on investments |
0.17 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.63 | (0.35 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
0.39 | (0.08 | ) | 1.09 | (0.65 | ) | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations (3) |
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 0.11 | ($ | 0.69 | ) | |||||||||
Dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
17,293,665 | 17,087,034 | 18,001,604 | 18,245,774 | 18,242,728 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
17,761,039 | 17,552,228 | 18,424,518 | 18,287,952 | 18,242,728 | |||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net investments |
$ | 592,933 | $ | 530,222 | $ | 481,081 | $ | 405,404 | $ | 356,246 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
631,605 | 573,355 | 522,090 | 456,912 | 425,288 | |||||||||||||||
Total borrowed funds |
455,136 | 400,915 | 339,395 | 287,454 | 250,767 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
461,977 | 407,000 | 351,629 | 294,378 | 263,423 | |||||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
169,628 | 166,354 | 170,461 | 162,116 | 161,865 | |||||||||||||||
Managed balance sheet data (4) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net investments |
$ | 833,639 | $ | 723,253 | $ | 643,541 | $ | 379,159 | $ | 356,246 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
893,588 | 792,973 | 709,910 | 456,939 | 425,288 | |||||||||||||||
Total borrowed funds |
716,620 | 620,022 | 525,933 | 287,454 | 250,767 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
723,960 | 626,619 | 539,448 | 294,378 | 263,423 | |||||||||||||||
29
Table of Contents
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands |
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Selected financial ratios and other data |
|||||||||||||||
Return on average assets (ROA) (5) |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) after taxes |
0.53 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.54 | % | (1.71 | %) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
2.20 | 1.23 | 4.96 | 0.47 | (2.72 | ) | |||||||||
Return on average equity (ROE) (6) |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) after taxes |
1.89 | 2.73 | (0.01 | ) | 1.44 | (4.71 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
7.82 | 4.09 | 13.82 | 1.24 | (7.47 | ) | |||||||||
Weighted average yields |
7.60 | % | 7.15 | % | 6.32 | % | 6.93 | % | 8.21 | % | |||||
Weighted average cost of funds |
4.72 | 3.75 | 3.33 | 3.21 | 4.91 | ||||||||||
Net interest margin (7) |
2.88 | 3.40 | 2.99 | 3.72 | 3.30 | ||||||||||
Noninterest income ratio (8) |
0.52 | 0.99 | 1.13 | 1.19 | 1.50 | ||||||||||
Total expense ratio (9) |
23 | 21 | 18 | 17 | 28 | ||||||||||
Operating expense ratio (10) |
2.91 | 3.54 | 4.17 | 4.32 | 6.84 | ||||||||||
As a percentage of net investment portfolio |
|||||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
72 | % | 71 | % | 65 | % | 76 | % | 59 | % | |||||
Commercial loans |
15 | 17 | 21 | 23 | 39 | ||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
8 | 8 | 7 | | | ||||||||||
Equity investments |
3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||
Investment securities |
2 | | | | | ||||||||||
Investments to assets (11) |
94 | % | 92 | % | 92 | % | 83 | % | 84 | % | |||||
Equity to assets (12) |
27 | 29 | 33 | 36 | 38 | ||||||||||
Debt to equity (13) |
268 | 241 | 199 | 177 | 155 | ||||||||||
(1) | Excluding the $63,000 and $9,417,000 costs of debt extinguishment in 2003 and 2002, net investment income after taxes would have been $1,519,000 or $0.08 and $1,605,000 or $0.09 per share in 2003 and 2002. |
(2) | Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments represents the increase (decrease) for the year in the fair value of our investments, including the results of operations for Medallion Bank, Medallion Taxi Media, and other controlled subsidiaries, where applicable. |
(3) | Excluding the costs and charges described in note (1), net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations would have been $2,081,000 or $0.11 per share and ($3,195,000) or ($0.18) per share in 2003 and 2002. |
(4) | Includes the balances of wholly-owned, unconsolidated portfolio companies, primarily Medallion Bank. |
(5) | ROA represents the net investment income after taxes or net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations, divided by average total assets. Excluding the costs and charges described in note (1), ROAs based on net investment income after taxes would have been 0.35% and 0.35% for 2003 and 2002. ROAs based on net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations would have been 0.48% and (0.69%). |
(6) | ROE represents the net investment income after taxes or net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations divided by average shareholders equity. Excluding the costs and charges described in note (1), ROEs based on net investment income after taxes would have been 0.91% and 0.90% for 2003 and 2002. ROEs based on net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations would have been 1.28% and (1.89%). |
(7) | Net interest margin represents net interest income for the year divided by average interest earning assets, and was 4.40%, 4.65%, and 4.37% on a managed basis for 2006, 2005, and 2004. |
(8) | Noninterest income ratio represents noninterest income divided by average interest earning assets. |
(9) | Total expense ratio represents total expenses (interest expense, operating expenses, and income taxes) divided by average shareholders equity. Excluding the $63,000 and $9,417,000 costs of debt extinguishment in 2003 and 2002, the ratios would have been 17% and 23%. |
(10) | Operating expense ratio represents operating expenses divided by average interest earning assets. Excluding the $63,000 and $9,417,000 costs of debt extinguishment in 2003 and 2002, the ratios would have been 4.31% and 4.52%. |
(11) | Represents net investments divided by total assets as of December 31. |
(12) | Represents total shareholders equity divided by total assets as of December 31. |
(13) | Represents total debt (floating rate and fixed rate borrowings) divided by total shareholders equity as of December 31. |
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANA LYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. In addition, this section contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. Certain factors that could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements are described in the Risk Factors section on page 18.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The SEC has recently issued cautionary advice regarding disclosure about critical accounting policies. The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of a companys financial condition and results, and that require managements most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about
30
Table of Contents
matters that are inherently uncertain and may change materially in subsequent periods. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and related notes. Significant estimates made by us include valuation of loans, evaluation of the recoverability of accounts receivable and income tax assets, and the assessment of litigation and other contingencies. The matters that give rise to such provisions are inherently uncertain and may require complex and subjective judgments. Although we believe that estimates and assumptions used in determining the recorded amounts of net assets and liabilities at December 31, 2005, are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from the estimated amounts recorded in our financial statements.
Change in reporting entity
Since Medallion Bank commenced operations in December 2003, we had historically consolidated Medallion Banks financial statements with those of our own. Although Medallion Bank is not an investment company, and SEC rules generally do not permit investment companies such as ours to consolidate the financial statements of non-investment companies, such as Medallion Bank, we had sought and obtained a letter from the SEC in March 2004 permitting such consolidation. We believed that consolidating Medallion Bank provided a more complete and accurate representation of our full scope of operations, and our complete financial position and results of operations.
During August 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form N-2 which the SEC staff reviewed and on which they provided comments, including those relating to the consolidation of the accounts of Medallion Bank. Based on discussion with the SEC staff, we determined during the 2006 fourth quarter to voluntarily not consolidate Medallion Bank and present Medallion Bank as a portfolio company. We determined that this change represents a change in the reporting entity as described in SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. Accordingly, we have retrospectively applied this change to the financial statements of all prior periods presented, including previously issued interim periods presented. The effect of this retrospective application is to present our financial position and results of operations as if Medallion Bank had not been consolidated for all periods presented and to present Medallion Bank as an unconsolidated portfolio investment. Although this creates changes in the reported levels of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations, shareholders equity, and the related amounts per common share are unchanged.
GENERAL
We are a specialty finance company that has a leading position in originating and servicing loans that finance taxicab medallions and various types of commercial businesses. A wholly-owned portfolio company of ours, Medallion Bank, also originates consumer loans for the purchase of recreational vehicles, boats, and horse trailers. Since 1996, the year in which we became a public company, we have increased our medallion loan portfolio at a compound annual growth rate of 12%, and our commercial loan portfolio at a compound annual growth rate of 8%. Total assets under our management, which includes assets serviced for third party investors and managed by unconsolidated portfolio companies, were approximately $907,133,000 as of December 31, 2006 and $802,000,000 at December 31, 2005, and have grown at a compound annual growth rate of 15% from $215,000,000 at the end of 1996.
Our loan-related earnings depend primarily on our level of net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the total yield on our loan portfolio and the average cost of borrowed funds. We fund our operations through a wide variety of interest-bearing sources, such as revolving bank facilities, bank certificates of deposit issued to customers, debentures issued to and guaranteed by the SBA, and bank term debt. Net interest income fluctuates with changes in the yield on our loan portfolio and changes in the cost of borrowed funds, as well as changes in the amount of interest-bearing assets and interest-bearing liabilities held by us. Net interest income is also affected by economic, regulatory, and competitive factors that influence interest rates, loan demand, and the availability of funding to finance our lending activities. We, like other financial institutions, are subject to interest rate risk to the degree that our interest-earning assets reprice on a different basis than our interest-bearing liabilities.
We also invest in small businesses in selected industries through our subsidiary Medallion Capital. Medallion Capitals investments are typically in the form of secured debt instruments with fixed interest rates accompanied by warrants to purchase an equity interest for a nominal exercise price (such warrants are included in equity investments on the consolidated balance sheets). Interest income is earned on the debt investments.
We are a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company under the 1940 Act. We have elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. We have also elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we generally do not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary
31
Table of Contents
income or capital gains that we distribute to our shareholders as dividends if we meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. Medallion Bank is not a RIC and must pay corporate-level federal income taxes.
Our wholly-owned portfolio company, Medallion Bank, is a bank regulated by the FDIC and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions. It originates taxicab medallion, commercial, and consumer loans, raises deposits, and conducts other banking activities. Medallion Bank provides us with our lowest costs of funds which it raises through bank certificates of deposits issued to its customers. To take advantage of this low cost of funds, we refer a portion of our taxicab medallion and commercial loans to Medallion Bank, which then originates these loans, which are serviced by us. We earn referral and servicing fee for these activities.
Realized gains or losses on investments are recognized when the investments are sold or written off. The realized gains or losses represent the difference between the proceeds received from the disposition of portfolio assets, if any, and the cost of such portfolio assets. In addition, changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments are recorded and represent the net change in the estimated fair values of the portfolio assets at the end of the period as compared with their estimated fair values at the beginning of the period. Generally, realized gains (losses) on investments and changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments are inversely related. When an appreciated asset is sold to realize a gain, a decrease in the previously recorded unrealized appreciation occurs. Conversely, when a loss previously recorded as unrealized depreciation is realized by the sale or other disposition of a depreciated portfolio asset, the reclassification of the loss from unrealized to realized causes a decrease in net unrealized depreciation and an increase in realized loss.
Our investments in Medallion Bank and Medallion Taxi Media, as wholly owned portfolio investments, were also subject to quarterly assessments of fair value. We conduct a thorough valuation analysis as described previously, and determine whether any factors give rise to a valuation different than recorded book value, including various regulatory restrictions that were established at Medallion Banks inception, by the FDIC and State of Utah, and also by additional marketplace restrictions, such as the ability to transfer industrial bank charters. As a result of this valuation process, we used Medallion Banks and Medallion Taxi Medias actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the results as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, although changes in these restrictions and other applicable factors could change these conclusions in the future.
Trends in Investment Portfolio
Our investment income is driven by the principal amount of and yields on our investment portfolio. To identify trends in the yields, the portfolio is grouped by medallion loans, commercial loans, consumer loans, equity investments, and investment securities.
32
Table of Contents
The following table illustrates our investments at fair value and the portfolio yields at the dates indicated.
December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest Rate (1) |
Investment Balances |
Interest Rate (1) |
Investment Balances |
Interest Rate (1) |
Investment Balances |
|||||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||
New York |
6.74 | % | $ | 340,110 | 6.27 | % | $ | 285,927 | 5.79 | % | $ | 238,347 | |||||||||
Boston |
8.12 | 32,787 | 7.50 | 25,556 | 7.38 | 15,272 | |||||||||||||||
Chicago |
6.88 | 31,077 | 6.95 | 48,045 | 6.32 | 48,754 | |||||||||||||||
Newark |
8.32 | 10,233 | 8.40 | 4,399 | 9.14 | 4,494 | |||||||||||||||
Cambridge |
7.93 | 8,184 | 7.24 | 5,409 | 7.19 | 4,654 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
7.55 | 5,586 | 7.46 | 5,977 | 8.18 | 2,064 | |||||||||||||||
Total medallion loans |
6.93 | 427,977 | 6.50 | 375,313 | 6.04 | 313,585 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
729 | 1,047 | 946 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(457 | ) | (1,097 | ) | (997 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net medallion loans |
$ | 428,249 | $ | 375,263 | $ | 313,534 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Secured mezzanine |
13.78 | % | $ | 53,732 | 14.06 | % | $ | 53,207 | 14.17 | % | $ | 51,660 | |||||||||
Asset based |
10.28 | 18,668 | 9.49 | 19,187 | 8.04 | 13,222 | |||||||||||||||
Other secured commercial |
9.59 | 18,504 | 8.85 | 25,979 | 7.91 | 25,447 | |||||||||||||||
SBA Section 7(a) (2) |
| | | | 7.63 | 17,649 | |||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans(2) |
12.21 | 90,904 | 11.79 | 98,373 | 10.88 | $ | 107,978 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
(98 | ) | (88 | ) | 503 | ||||||||||||||||
Discount on SBA Section 7(a) loans sold(2) |
| | (602 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(2,599 | ) | (6,800 | ) | (6,794 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net commercial loans |
$ | 88,207 | $ | 91,485 | $ | 101,085 | |||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
4.69 | % | $ | 9,961 | | | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on investment securities |
| | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment securities |
$ | 9,961 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Equity investments |
0.91 | % | $ | 13,955 | 1.59 | % | $ | 22,509 | 1.37 | % | $ | 32,960 | |||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on equities |
2,113 | 629 | 685 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net equity investments |
$ | 16,068 | $ | 23,138 | $ | 33,645 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
0.00 | % | $ | 50,448 | 0.00 | % | $ | 40,335 | 0.00 | % | $ | 33,443 | |||||||||
Investments at cost |
6.89 | % | $ | 593,245 | 6.78 | % | $ | 536,529 | 6.38 | % | $ | 487,966 | |||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
631 | 960 | 1,450 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on equities |
2,113 | 629 | 685 | ||||||||||||||||||
Discount on SBA Section 7(a) loans sold(2) |
| | (602 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(3,056 | ) | (7,896 | ) | (7,791 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net investments |
$ | 592,933 | $ | 530,222 | $ | 481,708 | |||||||||||||||
Medallion Bank investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
18.48 | % | $ | 113,777 | 18.45 | % | $ | 88,280 | 18.64 | % | $ | 69,638 | |||||||||
Medallion loans |
6.65 | 94,176 | 6.25 | 73,987 | 5.91 | 78,450 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
10.35 | 60,929 | 9.60 | 54,978 | 7.97 | 35,937 | |||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
4.60 | 21,841 | 4.11 | 17,873 | 3.92 | 14,144 | |||||||||||||||
Medallion Bank investments at cost (3) |
11.90 | 290,723 | 11.45 | 235,118 | 10.62 | 198,169 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
3,155 | 1,674 | 386 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on investment securities |
(402 | ) | (243 | ) | (49 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Premiums paid on purchased securities |
245 | 463 | 504 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(6,057 | ) | (5,025 | ) | (4,107 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Medallion Bank net investments |
$ | 287,664 | $ | 231,987 | $ | 194,903 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents the weighted average interest rate of the respective portfolio as of the date indicated. |
(2) | The Company sold substantially all of the SBA Section 7(a) loans in its portfolio in connection with the sale of the assets of Business Lenders to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch in October 2005. |
(3) | The weighted average interest rate for the entire managed loan portfolio (medallion, commercial, and consumer loans) was 9.44%, 9.00% and 8.44% at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. |
33
Table of Contents
PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Total Portfolio Yield
The weighted average yield of the total portfolio at December 31, 2006 was 6.89% (7.85% for the loan portfolio), an increase of 11 basis points from 6.78% at December 31, 2005, which was an increase of 40 basis points from 6.38% at December 31, 2004. The weighted average yield of the total managed portfolio at December 31, 2006 was 9.02% (9.44% for the loan portfolio), an increase of 38 basis points from 8.64% at December 31, 2005, which was an increase of 65 basis points from 7.99% at December 31, 2004. The increases in both years primarily reflected the market increase in interest rates, and the 2005 increase also reflected strong growth in the commercial loan portfolio. Managed portfolio yields were helped by the inclusion and growth of the high-yield consumer loan portfolio. We expect to try to increase the percentage of commercial loans in the total portfolio, the origination of floating and adjustable-rate loans, and the level of non-New York medallion loans to enhance our yields. Additionally, Medallion Bank expects to try to increase the percentage of consumer loans originated for the managed portfolio to increase our overall returns.
Medallion Loan Portfolio
Our medallion loans comprised 72% of the net portfolio of $592,933,000 at December 31, 2006, compared to 71% of $530,222,000 at December 31, 2005 and 65% of $481,708,000 at December 31, 2004. Our managed medallion loans of $522,193,000 comprised 63% of the net portfolio of $833,639,000 at December 31, 2006, compared to 62% of $723,253,000 at December 31, 2005 and 61% of $643,168,000 at December 31, 2004. The medallion loan portfolio increased by $52,985,000 or 14% in 2006 ($73,025,000 or 16% on a managed basis), primarily reflecting increases in New York and Boston. The increase in the New York market can be attributed to new business marketing efforts, the conversion of participations into owned loans, and the general increase in medallion values and related refinancings. Total medallion loans serviced for third parties were $5,783,000, $8,784,000, and $16,658,000 at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
The weighted average yield of the medallion loan portfolio at December 31, 2006 was 6.93%, an increase of 43 basis points from 6.50% at December 31, 2005, which was an increase of 46 basis points from 6.04% at December 31, 2004. The weighted average yield of the managed medallion loan portfolio at December 31, 2006 was 6.88%, an increase of 42 basis points from 6.46% at December 31, 2005, which was an increase of 45 basis points from 6.01% at December 31, 2004. The increase in yield primarily reflected the impact of rising interest rates in the economy and the effects of borrower refinancings. At December 31, 2006, 21% of the medallion loan portfolio represented loans outside New York, compared to 24% at year-end 2005 and 2004. At December 31, 2006, 18% of the managed medallion loan portfolio represented loans outside New York, compared to 22% at year-end 2005 and 2004. We continue to focus our efforts on originating higher yielding medallion loans outside the New York market.
Commercial Loan Portfolio
Our commercial loans represented 15% of the net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006, compared to 17% and 21% at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and were 18%, 20%, and 21% on a managed basis. Commercial loans decreased by $3,279,000 or 4% during 2006 (increased by $2,636,000 or 2% on a managed basis), primarily reflecting loan payoffs and loan participations sold. Total commercial loans serviced for third parties were $7,761,000, $349,000, and $106,508,000 at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, and included $98,773,000 related to the SBA Section 7(a) business in 2004. We sold substantially all of the Section 7(a) loans in its portfolio in connection with the sale of the assets of Business Lenders to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch in October 2005.
The weighted average yield of the commercial loan portfolio at December 31, 2006 was 12.21%, an increase of 42 basis points from 11.79% at December 31, 2005, which was up 91 basis points from 10.88% at December 31, 2004. The weighted average yield of the managed commercial loan portfolio at December 31, 2006 was 11.46%, an increase of 45 basis points from 11.01% at December 31, 2005, which was up 88 basis points from 10.13% at December 31, 2004. The increased yield reflected the increases in market interest rates. We continue to originate adjustable-rate and floating-rate loans tied to the prime rate to help mitigate our interest rate risk in a rising interest rate environment. At December 31, 2006, variable-rate loans represented approximately 26% of the commercial portfolio, compared to 29% and 43% at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and were 55%, 54%, and 43% on a managed basis. Although this strategy initially produces a lower yield, we believe that this strategy mitigates interest rate risk by better matching our earning assets to their adjustable-rate funding sources.
34
Table of Contents
Consumer loan portfolios
Our managed consumer loans, all of which are held in the portfolio managed by Medallion Bank, represented 13% of the managed net investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006, compared to 12% at December 31, 2005 and 10% at December 31, 2004. Medallion Bank started originating new adjustable rate consumer loans during the 2004 third quarter. Recreational vehicles, boats, and horse trailers located in all 50 states collateralize the loans. The portfolio is serviced by a third party subsidiary of a major commercial bank.
The weighted average gross yield of the managed consumer loan portfolio was 18.48% at December 31, 2006, compared to 18.45% and 18.64% at December 31, 2005 and 2004. Amortization of the portfolio purchase premium reduced the yield by an average of 0.96%, 1.90%, and 2.62% in 2006, 2005, and 2004. Adjustable rate loans represented approximately 84% of the managed consumer portfolio compared to 89% and 85% at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Delinquency and Loan Loss Experience
We generally follow a practice of discontinuing the accrual of interest income on our loans that are in arrears as to interest payments for a period of 90 days or more. We deliver a default notice and begin foreclosure and liquidation proceedings when management determines that pursuit of these remedies is the most appropriate course of action under the circumstances. A loan is considered to be delinquent if the borrower fails to make a payment on time; however, during the course of discussion on delinquent status, we may agree to modify the payment terms of the loan with a borrower that cannot make payments in accordance with the original loan agreement. For loan modifications, the loan will only be returned to accrual status if all past due interest payments are brought fully current. For credit that is collateral based, we evaluate the anticipated net residual value we would receive upon foreclosure of such loans, if necessary. There can be no assurance, however, that the collateral securing these loans will be adequate in the event of foreclosure. For credit that is cash flow-based, we assess our collateral position, and evaluate most of these relationships as ongoing businesses, expecting to locate and install a new operator to run the business and reduce the debt.
For the consumer loan portfolio, the process to repossess the collateral is started at 60 days past due. If the collateral is not located and the account reaches 120 days delinquent, the account is charged off to realized losses. If the collateral is repossessed, a realized loss is recorded to write the loan down to 75% of its net realizable value, and the collateral is sent to auction. When the collateral is sold, the net auction proceeds are applied to the account, and any remaining balance is written off as a realized loss, and any excess proceeds are recorded as a realized gain. Proceeds collected on charged off accounts are recorded as a realized gain. All collection, repossession, and recovery efforts are handled on behalf of MB by the servicer.
The following table shows the trend in loans 90 days or more past due as of December 31,
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
$ | 5,707,000 | 1.1 | % (1) | $ | 6,080,000 | 1.3 | % (1) | $ | 7,547,000 | 1.8 | % (1) | ||||||
Commercial loans |
||||||||||||||||||
Secured mezzanine |
3,459,000 | 0.7 | 7,970,000 | 1.7 | 8,171,000 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
SBA Section 7(a) (2) |
| 0.0 | | 0.0 | 1,884,000 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Asset-based receivable |
| 0.0 | | 0.0 | | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
Other secured commercial |
1,652,000 | 0.3 | 2,673,000 | 0.5 | 1,251,000 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
5,111,000 | 1.0 | 10,643,000 | 2.2 | 11,306,000 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
Total loans 90 days or more past due |
$ | 10,818,000 | 2.1 | % | $ | 16,723,000 | 3.5 | % | $ | 18,853,000 | 4.5 | % | ||||||
Total Medallion Bank loans |
$ | 631,000 | 0.2 | % | $ | 695,000 | 0.3 | % | $ | 541,000 | 0.3 | % | ||||||
Total managed loans 90 days or more past due |
$ | 11,449,000 | 1.5 | % | $ | 17,418,000 | 2.5 | % | $ | 19,394,000 | 3.2 | % | ||||||
(1) | Percentage is calculated against the total or managed loan portfolio, as appropriate. |
(2) | The company sold all of the SBA section 7 (a) loans in its portfolio in connection with the sale of the assets of BLL to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch in October 2005. |
In general, collection efforts since the establishment of our collection department have substantially contributed to the sizable reduction in overall delinquencies. The decreases in medallion delinquencies primarily reflected the foreclosure of $900,000 of Chicago medallions, and improvements in other borrower payment patterns. Secured mezzanine financing delinquencies have decreased, primarily reflecting payment activity, restructurings, and to a lesser extent chargeoffs. We sold all of the Section 7(a) loans in its portfolio in connection with the sale of the assets of Business Lenders to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch in October 2005. Included in the SBA Section 7(a) delinquency figures are $0, $0, and $288,000 at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, which represented loans repurchased for the purpose of collecting on the SBA guarantee. The decrease in other secured commercial loans primarily related to the resolution of several customers who had been monitored by the collections group. We are actively working
35
Table of Contents
with each delinquent borrower to bring them current, and believe that any potential loss exposure is reflected in our mark-to-market estimates on each loan. Although there can be no assurances as to changes in the trend rate, management believes that any loss exposures are properly reflected in reported asset values.
We monitor delinquent loans for possible exposure to loss by analyzing various factors, including the value of the collateral securing the loan and the borrower's prior payment history. Under the 1940 Act, our loan portfolio must be recorded at fair value or marked-to-market. Unlike other lending institutions, we are not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, the valuation of our portfolio is adjusted quarterly to reflect our estimate of the current realizable value of our loan portfolio. Since no ready market exists for this portfolio, fair value is subject to the good faith determination of management and the approval of our Board of Directors. Because of the subjectivity of these estimates, there can be no assurance that in the event of a foreclosure or the sale of portfolio loans we would be able to recover the amounts reflected on our balance sheet.
In determining the value of our portfolio, management and the Board of Directors may take into consideration various factors such as the financial condition of the borrower and the adequacy of the collateral. For example, in a period of sustained increases in market interest rates, management and the Board of Directors could decrease its valuation of the portfolio if the portfolio consists primarily of long-term, fixed-rate loans. Our valuation procedures are designed to generate values that approximate that which would have been established by market forces, and are therefore subject to uncertainties and variations from reported results. Based upon these factors, net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments is determined, or the amount by which our estimate of the current realizable value of our portfolio is above or below our cost basis.
The following table sets forth the changes in our unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Loans | Equity Investments |
Foreclosed Properties |
Total | ||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2003 |
($7,917,791 | ) | $ | 287,045 | ($317,361 | ) | ($7,948,107 | ) | |||||||
Increase in unrealized |
|||||||||||||||
Appreciation on investments |
| 2,820,058 | | 2,820,058 | |||||||||||
Depreciation on investments |
(4,209,093 | ) | (2,429,333 | ) | (512,279 | ) | (7,150,705 | ) | |||||||
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized |
|||||||||||||||
Losses on investments |
3,335,740 | 7,588 | 317,359 | 3,660,687 | |||||||||||
Other (1) |
1,000,000 | | | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2004 |
(7,791,144 | ) | 685,358 | (512,281 | ) | (7,618,067 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in unrealized |
|||||||||||||||
Appreciation on investments |
157,693 | (520,105 | ) | | (362,412 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation on investments |
(1,924,733 | ) | (1,022,404 | ) | (1,123,136 | ) | (4,070,273 | ) | |||||||
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized |
|||||||||||||||
Gains on investments |
| 1,485,883 | | 1,485,883 | |||||||||||
Losses on investments |
308,870 | | 238,667 | 547,537 | |||||||||||
Reversal of reserves on sold SBA Section 7(a) loans |
1,339,875 | | | 1,339,875 | |||||||||||
Other |
13,140 | | | 13,140 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2005 |
(7,896,299 | ) | 628,732 | (1,396,750 | ) | (8,664,317 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in unrealized |
|||||||||||||||
Appreciation on investments |
| 4,235,738 | 920,206 | 5,155,944 | |||||||||||
Depreciation on investments |
824,037 | (172,978 | ) | | 651,059 | ||||||||||
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized |
|||||||||||||||
Gains on investments |
| (2,578,646 | ) | | (2,578,646 | ) | |||||||||
Losses on investments |
4,016,566 | | 1,423,026 | 5,439,592 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2006 |
($3,055,696 | ) | $ | 2,112,846 | $ | 946,482 | $ | 3,632 | |||||||
(1) | Reflects the reclassification of a reserve related to collateral appreciation participation loans to accounts payable and accrued expenses. |
36
Table of Contents
The following table presents credit-related information for the investment portfolios as of December 31.
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Total loans |
||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
$ | 428,248,589 | $ | 375,263,403 | $ | 313,534,127 | ||||||
Commercial loans |
88,206,661 | 91,485,479 | 101,085,266 | |||||||||
Total loans |
516,455,250 | 466,748,882 | 414,619,393 | |||||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
50,448,032 | 40,335,393 | 33,443,242 | |||||||||
Equity investments (1) |
16,068,243 | 23,137,661 | 33,645,424 | |||||||||
Investment securities |
9,961,111 | | | |||||||||
Net investments |
$ | 592,932,636 | $ | 530,221,936 | $ | 481,708,059 | ||||||
Net investments at Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
$ | 287,664,054 | $ | 231,986,887 | $ | 194,903,093 | ||||||
Managed net investments |
$ | 833,638,878 | $ | 723,253,768 | $ | 643,541,008 | ||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
($456,587 | ) | ($1,097,134 | ) | ($997,321 | ) | ||||||
Commercial loans |
(2,599,109 | ) | (6,799,165 | ) | (6,793,823 | ) | ||||||
Total loans |
(3,055,696 | ) | (7,896,299 | ) | (7,791,144 | ) | ||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
| | | |||||||||
Equity investments |
2,112,846 | 628,732 | 685,360 | |||||||||
Investment securities |
| | | |||||||||
Total unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
($942,850 | ) | ($7,267,567 | ) | ($7,105,784 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments at Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
($6,459,096 | ) | ($5,268,228 | ) | ($4,155,647 | ) | ||||||
Managed total unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
($7,401,946 | ) | ($12,535,795 | ) | ($11,261,431 | ) | ||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) as a % of balances outstanding (2) |
||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
(0.11 | %) | (0.29 | %) | (0.32 | %) | ||||||
Commercial loans |
(2.86 | ) | (6.91 | ) | (6.29 | ) | ||||||
Total loans |
(0.59 | ) | (1.67 | ) | (1.85 | ) | ||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
| | | |||||||||
Equity investments |
(15.14 | ) | 2.79 | 2.08 | ||||||||
Investment securities |
| | | |||||||||
Net investments |
(0.16 | ) | (1.36 | ) | (1.46 | ) | ||||||
Net investments at Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
(2.22 | %) | (2.24 | %) | (2.10 | %) | ||||||
Managed net investments |
(0.88 | %) | (1.71 | %) | (1.73 | %) | ||||||
(1) | Represents common stock and warrants held as investments. |
(2) | Unlike other lending institutions, we are not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, the valuation of our portfolio is adjusted quarterly to reflect estimates of the current realizable value of the loan portfolio. These percentages represent the discount or premiums that investments are carried on the books at, relative to their par or gross value. |
37
Table of Contents
The following table presents the gain/loss experience on the investment portfolios for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Realized gains (losses) on loans and equity investments |
||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
$ | 18,788 | ($390,989 | ) | $ | 7,059 | ||||||
Commercial loans |
(5,473,137 | ) | (325,979 | ) | (3,305,800 | ) | ||||||
Total loans |
(5,454,349 | ) | (716,968 | ) | (3,298,741 | ) | ||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
| | | |||||||||
Equity investments |
8,534,067 | 4,323,087 | 5,627,794 | |||||||||
Investment securities |
| | | |||||||||
Total realized gains (losses) on loans and equity investments |
$ | 3,079,718 | $ | 3,606,119 | $ | 2,329,053 | ||||||
Net realized gains (losses) on investments at Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
(2,139,700 | ) | (2,525,114 | ) | (2,354,844 | ) | ||||||
Total managed realized gains (losses) on loans and equity investments (1) |
$ | 940,018 | $ | 1,081,005 | ($25,791 | ) | ||||||
Realized gains (losses) as a % of average balances outstanding |
||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
0.00 | % | (0.11 | %) | 0.00 | % | ||||||
Commercial loans |
(5.87 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (3.30 | ) | ||||||
Total loans |
(1.11 | ) | (0.16 | ) | (0.88 | ) | ||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
| | | |||||||||
Equity investments |
40.81 | 18.68 | 19.29 | |||||||||
Investment securities |
| | | |||||||||
Net investments |
0.59 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.57 | % | ||||||
Net investments at Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
(0.83 | %) | (1.17 | %) | (1.65 | %) | ||||||
Managed net investments |
0.12 | % | 0.16 | % | (0.00 | %) | ||||||
(1) | Includes realized gains/losses of $4,127, $0, and $22,226 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, related to foreclosed properties which are carried in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. |
Investment in Medallion Bank and Other Controlled Subsidiaries
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries were 9%, 8%, and 7% of our total portfolio at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. The portfolio company investments primarily represent the wholly-owned unconsolidated subsidiaries of ours, substantially all of which is represented by our investment in Medallion Bank, a non-pass-through, taxpaying entity. We are currently in discussions with the IRS to obtain LLC tax treatment for Medallion Bank, which would provide pass-through taxation for our shareholders, and which has already been agreed to by the State of Utah. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in our efforts, but if we are successful, this treatment would reduce taxes and increase the reported net income of Medallion Bank. See note 4 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information about these investments.
Equity Investments
Equity investments were 3%, 4%, and 7%, of our total portfolio at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Equity investments were 2%, 3%, and 5%, of our total managed portfolio at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Equity investments are comprised of common stock, partnership interests, and warrants. The decrease in equity investments during 2006 and 2005 primarily reflected the sale of shares of common stock of Clear Channel that were received in a tax-free exchange for 100% of our ownership interest in Medallion Taxi Media.
Investment Securities
Investment securities were 2%, 0%, and 0% of our total portfolio at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Investment securities were 4%, 3%, and 2% of our total managed portfolio at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. The investment securities are primarily adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities purchased by Medallion Bank to better utilize required cash liquidity.
Trend in Interest Expense
Our interest expense is driven by the interest rates payable on its short-term credit facilities with banks, bank certificates of deposit, fixed-rate, long-term debentures issued to the SBA, and other short-term notes payable. The establishment of the Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. line of credit in September 2002, and its favorable subsequent renegotiations had the effect of substantially reducing our cost of funds. Most recently, in December 2006, we established an additional medallion lending
38
Table of Contents
relationship with Citibank that provides for future growth in the portfolio at lower rates than under the existing facility with Merrill Lynch. In addition, Medallion Bank began raising brokered bank certificates of deposit during 2004, which were at our lowest borrowing costs. As a result of Medallion Bank raising funds through certificates of deposits as previously noted, we were able to realign the ownership of some of our medallion loans and related assets to Medallion Bank allowing us and our subsidiaries to use cash generated through these transactions to retire debt with higher interest rates. In addition, Medallion Bank is able to bid on these deposits at a wide variety of maturity levels which allows for improved interest rate management strategies.
Our cost of funds is primarily driven by the rates paid on its various debt instruments and their relative mix, and changes in the levels of average borrowings outstanding. See Notes 5 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for details on the terms of all outstanding debt. Our debentures issued to the SBA typically have terms of ten years.
We measure our borrowing costs as our aggregate interest expense for all of our interest-bearing liabilities divided by the average amount of such liabilities outstanding during the period. The following table shows the average borrowings and related borrowing costs for 2006, 2005, and 2004. Average balances have increased, primarily reflecting the funding needs to support the growth in our investment portfolios. The increase in borrowing costs reflected the trend of increasing interest rates in the economy and additional long-term SBA debt at higher rates.
Interest Expense |
Average Balance |
Average Borrowing Costs |
|||||||
December 31, 2006 |
|||||||||
Floating rate borrowings |
$ | 19,209,000 | $ | 347,812,000 | 5.52 | % | |||
Fixed rate borrowings |
4,981,000 | 77,250,000 | 6.45 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 24,190,000 | $ | 425,062,000 | 5.69 | ||||
Medallion Bank borrowings |
10,454,000 | 232,605,000 | 4.49 | ||||||
Total managed borrowings |
$ | 34,644,000 | $ | 657,667,000 | 5.27 | ||||
December 31, 2005 |
|||||||||
Floating rate borrowings |
$ | 13,398,000 | $ | 306,236,000 | 4.38 | % | |||
Fixed rate borrowings |
4,599,000 | 71,638,000 | 6.42 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 17,997,000 | $ | 377,874,000 | 4.76 | ||||
Medallion Bank borrowings |
6,400,000 | 195,732,000 | 3.27 | ||||||
Total managed borrowings |
$ | 24,397,000 | $ | 573,606,000 | 4.25 | ||||
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||
Floating rate borrowings |
$ | 8,917,000 | $ | 221,098,000 | 4.03 | % | |||
Fixed rate borrowings |
3,917,000 | 61,022,000 | 6.42 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 12,834,000 | $ | 282,120,000 | 4.55 | ||||
Medallion Bank borrowings |
3,245,000 | 130,978,000 | 2.46 | ||||||
Total managed borrowings |
$ | 16,064,000 | $ | 413,098,000 | 3.89 | ||||
We will continue to seek SBA funding to the extent it offers attractive rates. SBA financing subjects its recipients to limits on the amount of secured bank debt they may incur. We use SBA funding to fund loans that qualify under SBIA and SBA regulations. We believe that financing operations primarily with short-term floating rate secured bank debt has generally decreased our interest expense, but has also increased our exposure to the risk of increases in market interest rates, which we mitigate with certain interest rate strategies. At December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, short-term floating rate debt constituted 82%, 81%, and 78% of total debt, and was 53%, 52%, and 52% on a fully managed basis including the borrowings of Medallion Bank.
Taxicab Advertising
In addition to our finance business, we also conducted a taxicab rooftop advertising business primarily through Medallion Taxi Media, which began operations in November 1994, and ceased operations upon the merger of Medallion Taxi Media with and into a subsidiary of Clear Channel, and the sale of Medallion Media Japan to its management. See Note 4 to the financial statements for additional information. Although Medallion Taxi Media was a wholly-owned portfolio investment of ours, its results of operations were not consolidated with our operations because SEC regulations prohibit the consolidation of non-investment companies with investment companies.
39
Table of Contents
Factors Affecting Net Assets
Factors that affect our net assets include net realized gain or loss on investments and change in net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments. Net realized gain or loss on investments is the difference between the proceeds derived upon sale or foreclosure of a loan or an equity investment and the cost basis of such loan or equity investment. Change in net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments is the amount, if any, by which our estimate of the fair value of our investment portfolio is above or below the previously established fair value or the cost basis of the portfolio. Under the 1940 Act and the SBIA, our loan portfolio and other investments must be recorded at fair value.
Unlike certain lending institutions, we are not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses, but adjust quarterly the valuation of the loan portfolio to reflect our estimate of the current value of the total loan portfolio. Since no ready market exists for our loans, fair value is subject to our good faith determination. In determining such fair value, we and our Board of Directors consider factors such as the financial condition of its borrowers and the adequacy of their collateral. Any change in the fair value of portfolio loans or other investments as determined by us is reflected in net unrealized depreciation or appreciation of investments and affects net increase in net assets resulting from operations but has no impact on net investment income or distributable income.
Our investments in Medallion Bank and Medallion Taxi Media, as wholly owned portfolio investments, were also subject to quarterly assessments of fair value. We conduct a thorough valuation analysis as described previously, and determine whether any factors give rise to valuation different than recorded book value, including various regulatory restrictions that were established at Medallion Banks inception, by the FDIC and State of Utah, and also by additional marketplace restrictions, such as the ability to transfer industrial bank charters. As a result of this valuation process, we used Medallion Banks and Medallion Taxi Medias actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the results as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, although changes in these restrictions and other applicable factors could change these conclusions in the future.
Consolidated Results of Operations
Since Medallion Bank commenced operations in December 2003, we had historically consolidated Medallion Banks financial statements with those of our own. Although Medallion Bank is not an investment company, and SEC rules generally do not permit investment companies such as ours to consolidate the financial statements of non-investment companies, such as Medallion Bank, we had sought and obtained a letter from the SEC in March 2004 permitting such consolidation. We believed that consolidating Medallion Bank provided a more complete and accurate representation of our full scope of operations, and our complete financial position and results of operations.
During August 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form N-2 which the SEC staff reviewed and on which they provided comments, including those relating to the consolidation of the accounts of Medallion Bank. Based on discussion with the SEC staff, we determined during the 2006 fourth quarter to voluntarily not consolidate Medallion Bank and present Medallion Bank as a portfolio company. We determined that this change represents a change in the reporting entity as described in SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. Accordingly, we have retrospectively applied this change to the financial statements of all prior periods presented, including previously issued interim periods presented. The effect of this retrospective application is to present our financial position and results of operations as if Medallion Bank had not been consolidated for all periods presented and to present Medallion Bank as an unconsolidated portfolio investment. Although this creates changes in the reported levels of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations, shareholders equity, and the related amounts per common share are unchanged.
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $13,108,000 or $0.74 per diluted common share in 2006, up $6,246,000 or 91% from of $6,862,000 or $0.39 in 2005, which included the results of Business Lenders. The increase in 2006 primarily reflected higher net realized/unrealized portfolio gains, mostly representing the net appreciation on our investment in Medallion Bank, and lower operating expenses, partially offset by lower noninterest income and net interest income. Net investment income after taxes was $3,165,000 or $0.18 per diluted common share, down $1,417,000 or 31% from $4,582,000 or $0.26 per share in 2005.
Investment income was $39,635,000 in 2006, up $4,824,000 or 14% from $34,811,000 a year ago, and included $1,556,000 from interest recoveries on certain investments in 2006, compared to $1,480,000 in 2005. Investment income increased reflecting growth in the investment portfolios and higher yields earned. The yield on the investment portfolio was 7.60% in 2006, up 6% from 7.15% in 2005, reflecting the general increase in market interest rates and the refinancing of fixed rate loans at current rates. Average investments outstanding were $512,683,000 in 2006, up 7% from $480,405,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting growth in the medallion loan portfolio.
Medallion loans were $428,249,000 at year end, up $52,986,000 or 14% from $375,263,000 a year ago, representing 72% of the investment portfolio compared to 71% a year ago, and were yielding 6.93% compared to 6.50% a year ago, an increase of 7%. The increase in outstandings primarily reflected efforts to book new business and repurchase certain participations, primarily in the New York City and Boston markets, including the purchase of a $35,703,000 portfolio from Banco Popular, and also reflected the increase in medallion values, partially offset by several large fleet repayments, including reductions in Chicago. The managed medallion portfolio, which includes loans at Medallion Bank, was $527,976,000 at year end, up $70,024,000 or 15% from $457,952,000 a year ago. The commercial loan portfolio was $88,207,000 at year end, compared to $91,485,000 a year ago, a decrease of $3,278,000 or 4%, and represented 15% of the investment portfolio compared to 17% in 2005. The decrease primarily reflected the resolution of several large old nonperforming loans, relatively flat growth in the on-balance sheet asset-based lending portfolio, and the pay down of several large loans in the high-yield mezzanine loan portfolio. Commercial loans yielded 12.21% at year end, compared to 11.79% a year ago, an increase of 4%, reflecting the increases in market interest rates during year and the floating rate nature of much of the portfolio. The managed commercial portfolio, which includes loans at Medallion Bank, was $156,205,000 at year end, up $10,059,000 or 7% from $146,146,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting the increases described above and increased loan participations sold. Investments in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries was $50,448,000 at year end, up $10,113,000 or 25% from $40,335,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting the increased value of those investments, a large portion of
40
Table of Contents
which reflected the earnings of Medallion Bank. See Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information about Medallion Bank and the other controlled subsidiaries. Equity investments were $16,068,000, down $7,070,000 or 31% from $23,138,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting the sale of a portion of the Clear Channel common stock received for our ownership interest in Media and losses taken on certain mezzanine investments, partially offset by portfolio appreciation, and represented 3% of the investment portfolio and had a dividend yield of 0.91%, compared to 4% and 1.59% a year ago. Investment securities of $9,961,000 were up from zero a year ago, and represented 2% of the investment portfolio and yielded 4.69%. See page 33 for a table that shows balances and yields by type of investment.
Interest expense was $24,190,000 in 2006, up $6,193,000 or 34% from $17,997,000 in 2005. The increase in interest expense was due to the higher cost of borrowed funds compounded by increased levels of borrowings. The cost of borrowed funds was 5.69%, compared to 4.76% a year ago, an increase of 20%, reflecting increases in the general level of interest rates over the last year, and the floating rate nature of much of our borrowings. Average debt outstanding was $425,061,000 for 2006, compared to $377,874,000 a year ago, an increase of 12%, primarily reflecting increased borrowings used to fund portfolio investment growth. See page 39 for a table which shows average balances and cost of funds for our funding sources.
Net interest income was $15,445,000 and the net interest margin was 3.01% for 2006, down $1,369,000 or 8% from $16,814,000 a year ago, which represented a net interest margin of 3.50%, all reflecting the items discussed above.
Noninterest income was $2,647,000 in 2006, down $2,091,000 or 44% from $4,738,000 a year ago. Excluding amounts related to the sold Business Lenders loan portfolio, noninterest income, which is comprised of servicing fee income, prepayment fees, late charges, and other miscellaneous income, was down $203,000 or 7%. Included in 2006 were $629,000 of unusually large prepayment penalties from several large paid-off loans, compared to $810,000 a year ago. Excluding those prepayment penalties, noninterest income was relatively flat from year to year.
Operating expenses were $14,926,000 in 2006, compared to $16,984,000 in 2005, a decrease of $2,058,000 or 12%. Excluding the amounts related to the sold Business Lenders loan portfolio, operating expenses were up $840,000 or 6%, primarily reflecting costs of our growth initiatives. Salaries and benefits expense excluding Business Lenders was $8,193,000 in the year, up $519,000 or 7% from $7,674,000 in 2005, primarily reflecting lower amounts of salary deferrals related to loan originations, the costs associated with options granted, and increase in headcount and salary levels, partially offset by lower bonus accruals. Professional fees excluding Business Lenders were $1,956,000 in 2006, up $140,000 or 8% from $1,816,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting higher investment project-related professional costs and costs associated with certain investments. Other operating expenses excluding Business Lenders of $4,777,000 in the year were up $181,000 or 4% from $4,596,000 in 2005, reflecting lower travel and entertainment, depreciation, and advertising, partially offset by higher loan collections and miscellaneous tax expenses.
Income tax expense was $0 in 2006, compared to a tax benefit of $14,000 a year ago.
Net unrealized appreciation on investments was $6,863,000 in 2006, compared to depreciation of $1,326,000 in 2005, an increase of $8,189,000. Net unrealized depreciation net of the net unrealized appreciation on Medallion Bank and the other controlled subsidiaries was $591,000 in 2006 and $6,339,000 in 2005, resulting in decreased depreciation of $5,748,000 in 2006. Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) arises when we make valuation adjustments to the investment portfolio. When investments are sold or written off, any resulting realized gain (loss) is grossed up to reflect previously recorded unrealized components. As a result, movement between periods can appear distorted. The 2006 activity resulted from net appreciation on Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries of $7,454,000, net unrealized appreciation on equity investments of $4,236,000, reversals of unrealized depreciation associated with fully depreciated loans which were charged off of $4,017,000, and net unrealized appreciation on foreclosed property of $920,000, partially offset by net unrealized depreciation on loans of $7,185,000 and reversals of unrealized appreciation associated with equity investments that were sold of $2,579,000. The 2005 activity resulted from reversals of unrealized appreciation associated with equity investments that were sold of $5,514,000, net unrealized depreciation on foreclosed property of $1,123,000, and net unrealized depreciation on loans of $1,011,000, partially offset by net appreciation on Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries of $5,012,000, net unrealized appreciation on equity investments of $827,000, and reversals of unrealized depreciation associated with fully depreciated loans which were charged off of $483,000.
Also included in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments was the net unrealized appreciation on Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries of $7,454,000 in 2006 and $5,012,000 in 2005. Both years primarily reflected the results of operations of Medallion Bank. See notes 3 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements for information about these controlled subsidiaries.
41
Table of Contents
Our net realized gains on investments were $3,080,000 in 2006, compared to $3,606,000 in 2005. The 2006 activity reflected the reversals described in the unrealized paragraph above and net direct gains on sales of equity and other investments of $5,997,000 and gains on sales of foreclosed property of $4,000, partially offset by net direct chargeoffs $1,483,000. The 2005 activity reflected the above and net direct gains on sales of equity investments of $2,439,000, partially offset by net direct chargeoffs of $3,864,000.
The Companys net realized/unrealized gains on investments were $9,943,000 in 2006, compared to $2,280,000 in 2005, reflecting the above.
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $6,862,000 or $0.39 per diluted common share in 2005, down $15,651,000 or 70% from $22,512,000 or $1.22 in 2004, which included net realized/unrealized gains of $22,417,000 primarily related to the 2004 exchange of our investment in Medallion Taxi Media for stock of Clear Channel. Excluding those gains, net increase in net assets resulting from operations increased primarily from higher net interest income resulting from portfolio growth and net realized/unrealized gains in the portfolio, partially offset by increased operating expenses. Net investment income after taxes was $4,582,000 or $0.26 per diluted common share in 2005, up $4,591,000 from ($9,000) or ($0.00) per share in 2004.
Investment income was $34,811,000 in 2005, up $9,978,000 or 40% from $24,833,000 a year ago. Investment income in 2005 also benefited from interest recoveries of $1,480,000 from certain investments. Excluding those items, investment income increased $8,498,000 or 34% compared to a year ago, primarily reflecting growth in the investment portfolios. The yield on the investment portfolio was 7.15% in 2005, up 13% from 6.32% a year ago, reflecting the general increase in market interest rates and the interest recoveries. The yield on the investment portfolio excluding the interest recoveries was 6.83% in 2005, up 9% from 2004. Average investments outstanding were $480,405,000 in 2005, up 25% from $385,627,000 a year ago.
Medallion loans were $375,263,000 at year end, up $61,729,000 or 20% from $313,534,000 a year ago, representing 71% of the investment portfolio compared to 65% in 2004, and were yielding 6.50% compared to 6.04% in 2004, an increase of 8%. The increase in outstandings primarily reflected efforts to book new business and repurchase certain participations, primarily in the New York City and Boston markets, and also reflected the increase in medallion values. The managed medallion portfolio, which includes loans at Medallion Bank, was $458,457,000 at year end, up $49,678,000 or 12% from $408,779,000 a year ago. The commercial loan portfolio was $91,485,000 at year end, compared to $101,085,000 a year ago, a decrease of $9,600,000 or 9%, and represented 17% of the investment portfolio compared to 21% in 2004. Included in the 2004 amounts were $19,457,000 of SBA 7(a) loans which were sold for book value during 2005. Excluding those loans, commercial loans increased 12%. Commercial loans yielded 11.79% at year end, compared to 10.88% a year ago, an increase of 8%, reflecting the increases in market interest rates during year, the floating rate nature of much of the portfolio, and the growth in higher yielding portfolios. The increase in commercial loans was concentrated in asset based receivables and high-yield mezzanine loans. The managed commercial portfolio, which includes loans at Medallion Bank, was $146,146,000 at year end, down $97,197,000 or 40% from $243,343,000 a year ago, but was up $21,033,000 or 17% from $125,113,000 excluding the sold SBA 7(a) loans, primarily reflecting the increases described above, partially offset by increased loan participations purchased. Investments in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries was $40,335,000 at year end, up $6,892,000 or 21% from $33,443,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting the increased value of those investments, a large portion of which reflected the earnings of Medallion Bank. See Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Equity investments were $23,138,000, down $10,507,000 or 31% from $33,645,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting the sale of a portion of the Clear Channel common stock received for our ownership interest in Medallion Taxi Media, and losses taken on certain mezzanine investments, and represented 4% of the investment portfolio and had a dividend yield of 1.59%, compared to 7% and 1.37% a year ago. See page 33 for a table that shows balances and yields by type of investment.
Interest expense was $17,997,000 in 2005, up $5,163,000 or 40% from $12,834,000 in 2004. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to higher average borrowed funds outstanding. Average debt outstanding was $377,874,000 for 2005, compared to $282,121,000 a year ago, an increase of 34%, primarily reflecting increased utilization of the Merrill Lynch line of credit and in other borrowings used to fund portfolio investment growth. The cost of borrowed funds was 4.76% in 2005, compared to 4.55% a year ago, an increase of 5%, reflecting increases in the general level of interest rates over the last year. See page 39 for a table which shows average balances and cost of funds for our funding sources.
Net interest income was $16,814,000 and the net interest margin was 3.50% for 2005, up $4,815,000 or 40% from $11,999,000 in 2004, which represented a net interest margin of 3.11%, all reflecting the items discussed above.
Noninterest income was $4,738,000 in 2005, up $404,000 or 9% from $4,334,000 a year ago. Gains on the sale of loans were $885,000 in 2005, down $19,000 or 2% from $904,000 in 2004. During 2005, $10,785,000 of guaranteed loans were sold under
42
Table of Contents
the SBA program, compared to $10,311,000 in 2004, an increase of 5%. The change in gains on sale under the SBA program primarily reflected the sale of the SBA loan portfolio during the 2005 fourth quarter, as well as the level of loan origination and sales activities during the rest of the year, partially offset by lower market-determined net premiums received on the sales in 2005. Other income, which is comprised of servicing fee income, prepayment fees, late charges, and other miscellaneous income, was $3,853,000 in 2005, compared to $3,430,000 a year ago, an increase of $423,000 or 12%. Included in 2005 were $892,000 of prepayment penalties from several large paid-off loans. Excluding the prepayment penalties, other income in 2005 decreased $475,000 or 14%, primarily reflecting the $447,000 decline in servicing fee income and other related income amounts associated with the sold SBA (7a) loan portfolio.
Operating expenses were $16,984,000 in 2005, compared to $16,083,000 in 2004, an increase of $901,000 or 6%, primarily reflecting increased expenses associated with our growth, partially offset by the reduced costs associated with the sold SBA 7(a) loan portfolio. Salaries and benefits expense was $9,554,000 in 2005, up $1,112,000 or 13% from $8,442,000 in 2004, primarily reflecting an increase in headcount compared to 2004 and higher levels of salaries and bonuses, partially offset by higher amounts of salary deferrals related to loan originations. Professional fees were $1,945,000 in 2005, up $538,000 or 38% from $1,407,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting higher investment project-related professional costs, increased legal and accounting costs, including costs related to our compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley, and in 2004 was reduced by expense reimbursements for professional fees associated with the Medallion Taxi Media sale. Other operating expenses of $5,484,000 in 2005 were down $751,000 or 12% from $6,235,000 a year ago. The decrease primarily reflected reduced levels of miscellaneous taxes, loan collections, insurance, and other expenses partially offset by greater usage of temporary help and increased expenses associated with business development activities.
Income tax expense was ($14,000) in 2005, compared to $259,000 a year ago.
Net unrealized depreciation on investments was $1,326,000 in 2005, compared to appreciation of $20,192,000 in 2004, a decrease of $21,518,000. During the 2004 third quarter, we exchanged our investment in Medallion Taxi Media for common stock of Clear Channel, resulting in an unrealized gain of $23,512,000 and a realized gain of $1,477,000. Net unrealized depreciation net of the exchange gain and the net unrealized appreciation on Medallion Bank and the other controlled subsidiaries was $3,663,000 in 2004, resulting in decreased depreciation of $2,337,000 in 2005. Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) arises when we make valuation adjustments to the investment portfolio. When investments are sold or written off, any resulting realized gain (loss) is grossed up to reflect previously recorded unrealized components. As a result, movement between periods can appear distorted. The 2005 activity resulted from reversals of unrealized appreciation associated with equity investments that were sold of $5,514,000, net unrealized depreciation on foreclosed property of $1,123,000, and net unrealized depreciation on loans of $1,011,000, partially offset by net appreciation on Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries of $5,012,000, net unrealized appreciation on equity investments of $827,000, and reversals of unrealized depreciation associated with fully depreciated loans which were charged off of $483,000. The 2004 activity resulted from net unrealized depreciation on loans of $4,321,000, the reversals of unrealized appreciation associated with equity investments that were sold of $2,676,000, net decreases in the valuation of equity investments of $2,479,000, and net unrealized depreciation of $512,000 on foreclosed property, partially offset by the reversals of unrealized depreciation associated with fully depreciated loans which were charged off of $3,505,000 and unrealized appreciation on equity investments of $2,820,000.
Also included in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments was the net unrealized appreciation on Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries of $5,012,000 in 2005 and $343,000 in 2004. The 2005 amounts primarily reflected the results of operations of Medallion Bank, and in 2004 were largely offset by the net losses of at Medallion Taxi Media advertising divisions prior to their sale during the 2004 third quarter. Medallion Taxi Media generated net losses of $2,827,000 in 2004. Our investment in Medallion Taxi Media was exchanged for stock in Clear Channel, as described above, and Medallion Media Japan was sold to its management, which resulted in a realized gain of $255,000. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for information about these controlled subsidiaries.
Our net realized gain on investments was $3,606,000 in 2005 and $2,329,000 in 2004, reflecting the reversals described in the unrealized paragraph above and net direct gains on sales of equity investments of $2,439,000, partially offset by net direct chargeoffs of $3,864,000. The 2004 activity reflected the above and direct gains on sales of equity investments of $2,953,000, net direct recoveries of $183,000, and direct gains on sales of foreclosed property of $22,000.
Our net realized/unrealized gains on investments were $2,280,000 in 2005, compared to $22,521,000 in 2004, reflecting the above.
43
Table of Contents
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We, like other financial institutions, are subject to interest rate risk to the extent that our interest-earning assets (consisting of medallion, commercial, and consumer loans; and investment securities) reprice on a different basis over time in comparison to our interest-bearing liabilities (consisting primarily of credit facilities with banks, bank certificates of deposit, and subordinated SBA debentures).
Having interest-bearing liabilities that mature or reprice more frequently on average than assets may be beneficial in times of declining interest rates, although such an asset/liability structure may result in declining net earnings during periods of rising interest rates. Abrupt increases in market rates of interest may have an adverse impact on our earnings until we are able to originate new loans at the higher prevailing interest rates. Conversely, having interest-earning assets that mature or reprice more frequently on average than liabilities may be beneficial in times of rising interest rates, although this asset/liability structure may result in declining net earnings during periods of falling interest rates. This mismatch between maturities and interest rate sensitivities of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities results in interest rate risk.
The effect of changes in interest rates is mitigated by regular turnover of the portfolio. Based on past experience, we anticipate that approximately 40% of the taxicab medallion portfolio will mature or be prepaid each year. We believe that the average life of our loan portfolio varies to some extent as a function of changes in interest rates. Borrowers are more likely to exercise prepayment rights in a decreasing interest rate environment because the interest rate payable on the borrower's loan is high relative to prevailing interest rates. Conversely, borrowers are less likely to prepay in a rising interest rate environment. However, borrowers may prepay for a variety of other reasons, such as to monetize increases in the underlying collateral values, particularly in the medallion loan portfolio.
In addition, we manage our exposure to increases in market rates of interest by incurring fixed-rate indebtedness, such as ten year subordinated SBA debentures, and by setting repricing intervals or the maturities of tranches drawn under the revolving line of credit or issued as certificates of deposit, for terms of up to five years. We had outstanding SBA debentures of $77,250,000 with a weighted average interest rate of 6.05%, constituting 17% of our total indebtedness as of December 31, 2006. Also, as of December 31, 2006, portions of the adjustable rate debt with Banks repriced at intervals of as long as 36 months, and certain of the certificates of deposit were for terms of up to 45 months, further mitigating the immediate impact of changes in market interest rates.
A relative measure of interest rate risk can be derived from our interest rate sensitivity gap. The interest rate sensitivity gap represents the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which mature and/or reprice within specified intervals of time. The gap is considered to be positive when repriceable assets exceed repriceable liabilities, and negative when repriceable liabilities exceed repriceable assets. A relative measure of interest rate sensitivity is provided by the cumulative difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities for a given time interval expressed as a percentage of total assets.
44
Table of Contents
The following table presents our interest rate sensitivity gap at December 31, 2006, compared to the respective positions at the end of 2005 and 2004. The principal amount of interest earning assets are assigned to the time frames in which such principal amounts are contractually obligated to be repriced. We have has not reflected an assumed annual prepayment rate for such assets in this table.
December 31, 2006 Cumulative Rate Gap (1)
(Dollars in thousands) |
Less Than 1 Year |
More Than 1 and Less Than 2 Years |
More Than 2 and Less Than 3 Years |
More Than 3 and Less Than 4 Years |
More Than 4 and Less Than 5 Years |
More Than 5 and Less Than 6 Years |
Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Earning assets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Floating-rate |
$ | 19,192 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 19,192 | |||||||||||||
Adjustable rate |
24,619 | 12,432 | 2,754 | 2,524 | 12,932 | | | 55,261 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed-rate |
38,647 | 101,800 | 144,748 | 59,753 | 78,129 | 1,527 | 19,823 | 444,427 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
25,360 | | | | | | | 25,360 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
$ | 107,818 | $ | 114,232 | $ | 147,502 | $ | 62,277 | $ | 91,061 | $ | 1,527 | $ | 19,823 | $ | 544,240 | |||||||||||||
Interest bearing liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revolving line of credit |
$ | 362,676 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 362,676 | |||||||||||||
Notes payable to banks |
12,157 | | 3,053 | | | | | 15,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SBA debentures |
| | | | 17,985 | 13,500 | 45,765 | 77,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 374,833 | $ | | $ | 3,053 | $ | | $ | 17,985 | $ | 13,500 | $ | 45,765 | $ | 455,136 | |||||||||||||
Interest rate gap |
($ | 267,015 | ) | $ | 114,232 | $ | 144,449 | $ | 62,277 | $ | 73,076 | ($ | 11,973 | ) | ($ | 25,942 | ) | $ | 89,104 | ||||||||||
Cumulative interest rate gap (2) |
($ | 267,015 | ) | ($ | 152,783 | ) | ($ | 8,334 | ) | $ | 53,943 | $ | 127,019 | $ | 115,046 | $ | 89,104 | | |||||||||||
December 31, 2005 (2) |
($ | 99,581 | ) | ($ | 118,589 | ) | $ | 43,224 | $ | 105,049 | $ | 153,469 | $ | 139,543 | $ | 96,083 | | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2004 (2) |
9,872 | 41,392 | 48,765 | 91,854 | 153,291 | 154,931 | 100,875 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | The ratio of the cumulative one year gap to total interest rate sensitive assets was (49%), (20%), and 2% as of December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, and was (34%), 11%, and 4% on a combined basis with Medallion Bank. |
(2) | Adjusted for the medallion loan 40% prepayment assumption results in cumulative one year negative interest rate gap and related ratio of $127,184,000 or 23%, compared to positive gaps of $10,768,000 or 2% and $96,670,000 or 22% for December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and was ($117,151,000) or (14%), $47,912,000 or 6%, and $136,030,000 or 21% on a combined basis with Medallion Bank. |
Our interest rate sensitive assets were approximately $544,240,000 and interest rate sensitive liabilities were $455,136,000 at December 31, 2006. The one-year cumulative interest rate gap was a negative $267,015,000 or 49% of interest rate sensitive assets, compared to a negative $99,581,000 or 20% at December 31, 2005. However, using our estimated 40% prepayment/refinancing rate for medallion loans to adjust the interest rate gap resulted in a negative gap of $127,184,000 or 23% at December 31, 2006. We seek to manage interest rate risk by originating adjustable-rate loans, by incurring fixed-rate indebtedness, by evaluating appropriate derivatives, pursuing securitization opportunities, and by other options consistent with managing interest rate risk.
On a combined basis with Medallion Bank, our interest rate sensitive assets were approximately $849,662,000 and interest rate sensitive liabilities were $716,620,000 at December 31, 2006. The one-year cumulative interest rate gap was a negative $287,680,000 or 34% of interest rate sensitive assets, compared to a negative $82,358,000 or 11% at December 31, 2005. However, using our estimated 40% prepayment/refinancing rate for medallion loans to adjust the interest rate gap resulted in a negative gap of $117,151,000 or 14% at December 31, 2006.
Interest Rate Cap Agreements
From time-to time, we enter into interest rate cap agreements to manage the exposure of the portfolio to increases in market interest rates by hedging a portion of our variable-rate debt against increases in interest rates. There were no interest rate caps outstanding during 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our sources of liquidity are the revolving lines of credit with Merrill Lynch and Citibank, unfunded commitments from the SBA for long-term debentures that are issued to or guaranteed by the SBA, loan amortization and prepayments, and participations or sales of loans to third parties. As a RIC, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income; consequently, we have primarily relied upon external sources of funds to finance growth. The Trusts $375,000,000 revolving line of
45
Table of Contents
credit with Merrill Lynch had availability of $92,740,000, and Trust IIs $125,000,000 line had availability of $58,511,000 as of December 31, 2006. Medallion Capital and Freshstart have $13,500,000 and $6,000,000 of additional funding commitments with the SBA, which requires capital contributions from us of $6,750,000 and $2,000,000, respectively. Since SBA financing subjects its recipients to certain regulations, we will seek funding at the subsidiary level to maximize its benefits. Lastly $15,425,000 was available under revolving credit agreements with commercial banks, and approximately $4,225,000 was available under the companys margin loan.
Additionally, Medallion Bank, our wholly-owned, unconsolidated portfolio company has access to independent sources of funds for our business originated there, primarily through brokered certificates of deposit. At the current required capital levels, it is expected, although there can be no guarantee, that deposits of approximately $2,800,000 could be raised by Medallion Bank to fund future loan origination activity, and Medallion Bank also has $35,000,000 available under Fed Funds lines with several commercial banks. In addition, Medallion Bank as a non-RIC subsidiary of ours is allowed to retain all earnings in the business to fund future growth.
The components of our debt were as follows at December 31, 2006. See notes 5 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements on page F-21 for details of the contractual terms of our borrowings.
Balance | Percentage | Rate (1) | |||||||
Revolving lines of credit |
$ | 348,749,000 | 77 | % | 5.52 | % | |||
SBA debentures |
77,250,000 | 17 | 6.05 | ||||||
Notes payable to banks |
15,210,000 | 3 | 7.41 | ||||||
Margin loan |
13,927,000 | 3 | 6.19 | ||||||
Total outstanding debt |
$ | 455,136,000 | 100 | % | 5.69 | ||||
Certificates of deposit at Medallion Bank |
261,484,000 | | 4.36 | % | |||||
Total outstanding debt, including Medallion Bank |
$ | 716,620,000 | | 5.21 | |||||
(1) | Weighted average contractual rate as of December 31, 2006. |
Our contractual obligations expire on or mature at various dates through September 1, 2015. The following table shows all contractual obligations at December 31, 2006.
Payments due by period | |||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 year |
1 2 years |
2 3 years |
3 4 years |
4 5 years |
More than 5 years |
Total | |||||||||||||||
Floating rate borrowings |
$ | 26,192,000 | $ | 282,368,000 | $ | 69,326,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 377,886,000 | |||||||
Fixed rate borrowings |
| | | | 17,985,000 | 59,265,000 | 77,250,000 | ||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
1,176,000 | 1,118,000 | 1,081,000 | 1,025,000 | 1,025,000 | 4,139,000 | 9,564,000 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 27,368,000 | $ | 283,486,000 | $ | 70,407,000 | $ | 1,025,000 | $ | 19,010,000 | $ | 63,404,000 | $ | 464,700,000 | |||||||
Certificates of deposit at Medallion Bank |
111,869,000 | 76,655,000 | 68,460,000 | 4,500,000 | | | 261,484,000 | ||||||||||||||
Total, including Medallion Bank |
$ | 139,237,000 | $ | 360,141,000 | $ | 138,867,000 | $ | 5,525,000 | $ | 19,010,000 | $ | 63,404,000 | $ | 726,184,000 | |||||||
We value our portfolio at fair value as determined in good faith by management and approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with our valuation policy. Unlike certain lending institutions, we are not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, we must value each individual investment and portfolio loan on a quarterly basis. We record unrealized depreciation on investments and loans when we believe that an asset has been impaired and full collection is unlikely. We record unrealized appreciation on equities if we have a clear indication that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, our equity investment has also appreciated in value. Without a readily ascertainable market value, the estimated value of our portfolio of investments and loans may differ significantly from the values that would be placed on the portfolio if there existed a ready market for the investments. We adjust the valuation of the portfolio quarterly to reflect managements estimate of the current fair value of each investment in the portfolio. Any changes in estimated fair value are recorded in our statement of operations as net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments. Our investment in Medallion Bank and Medallion Taxi Media, as wholly-owned portfolio investments, was also subject to quarterly assessments of its fair value. We conduct a thorough valuation analysis as described previously, and determine whether any factors give rise to valuation different than recorded book value. As a result of this valuation process, we used Medallion Banks and Medallion Taxi Medias actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the result as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments.
46
Table of Contents
In addition, the illiquidity of our loan portfolio and investments may adversely affect our ability to dispose of loans at times when it may be advantageous for us to liquidate such portfolio or investments. In addition, if we were required to liquidate some or all of the investments in the portfolio, the proceeds of such liquidation may be significantly less than the current value of such investments. Because we borrow money to make loans and investments, our net operating income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these funds. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our interest income. In periods of sharply rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which would reduce our net operating income before net realized and unrealized gains. We use a combination of long-term and short-term borrowings and equity capital to finance our investing activities. Our long-term fixed-rate investments are financed primarily with short-term floating-rate debt, and to a lesser extent by term fixed-rate debt. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. We have analyzed the potential impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Assuming that the balance sheet were to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate sensitivity, and including the impact on Medallion Bank, a hypothetical immediate 1% change in interest rates would have positively impacted net increase in net assets resulting from operations as of at December 31, 2006 by approximately $399,000 on an annualized basis, compared to a negative impact of ($100,000) as of December 31, 2005, and the impact of such an immediate 1% change over a one year period would have been ($2,334,000), compared to ($753,000) for 2005. Although management believes that this measure is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential changes in credit quality, size and composition of the assets on the balance sheet, and other business developments that could affect net increase in net assets resulting from operations in a particular quarter or for the year taken as a whole. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the potential outcome simulated by these estimates.
We continue to work with investment banking firms and other financial intermediaries to investigate the viability of a number of other financing options which include, among others, the sale or spin off certain assets or divisions, the development of a securitization conduit program, and other independent financing for certain subsidiaries or asset classes. These financing options would also provide additional sources of funds for both external expansion and continuation of internal growth.
47
Table of Contents
The following table illustrates sources of available funds for us and each of our subsidiaries, and amounts outstanding under credit facilities and their respective end of period weighted average interest rates at December 31, 2006. See notes 5 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about each credit facility.
(Dollars in thousands) |
The Company |
MFC | MCI | MBC | FSVC | UTAH | Total | 12/31/05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
$ | 1,417 | $ | 4,775 | $ | 5,907 | $ | 2,531 | $ | 769 | $ | 15,399 | $ | 22,808 | |||||||||||||||||
Bank loans (1) (2) (3) |
20,000 | 6,000 | 26,000 | 19,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts undisbursed |
12,500 | 2,925 | 15,425 | 13,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts outstanding |
7,500 | 7,710 | 15,210 | 8,550 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
7.32 | % | 7.50 | % | 7.41 | % | 6.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity |
06/07 | |
06/07- 12/09 |
|
|
06/07- 12/09 |
|
|
2/06- 6/07 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Lines of Credit (4) |
500,000 | 500,000 | 325,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts undisbursed |
151,251 | 151,251 | 20,547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts outstanding |
348,749 | 348,749 | 304,453 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
5.52 | % | 5.52 | % | 4.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity |
|
09/08- 12/09 |
|
|
09/08- 12/09 |
|
9/06 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Margin loan |
13,927 | 13,927 | 10,663 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
6.19 | % | 6.19 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity |
N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SBA debentures (5) |
46,750 | 50,000 | 96,750 | 77,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts undisbursed |
13,500 | 6,000 | 19,500 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts outstanding |
33,250 | 44,000 | 77,250 | 77,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
6.02 | % | 6.08 | % | 6.05 | % | 6.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity |
|
9/11- 9/15 |
|
|
9/11- 3/16 |
|
|
9/11- 3/16 |
|
|
9/11- 9/15 |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total cash and amounts remaining undisbursed under credit facilities |
$ | 13,917 | $ | 158,951 | $ | 19,407 | $ | 2,531 | $ | 6,769 | $ | | $ | 201,575 | $ | 56,856 | |||||||||||||||
Total debt outstanding |
$ | 21,427 | $ | 356,459 | $ | 33,250 | $ | | $ | 44,000 | $ | | $ | 455,136 | $ | 400,915 | |||||||||||||||
Including Medallion Bank |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
$ | 14,699 | $ | 14,699 | $ | 20,227 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
261,484 | 261,484 | 219,107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
4.36 | % | 4.36 | % | 3.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity |
|
01/07- 10/10 |
|
|
01/07- 10/10 |
|
|
1/06- 9/09 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cash and amounts remaining undisbursed under credit facilities |
$ | 13,917 | $ | 158,951 | $ | 19,407 | $ | 2,531 | $ | 6,769 | $ | 14,699 | $ | 216,274 | $ | 77,083 | |||||||||||||||
Total debt outstanding |
$ | 21,427 | $ | 356,459 | $ | 33,250 | $ | | $ | 44,000 | $ | 261,484 | $ | 716,620 | $ | 620,022 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | In August 2006, the line of credit with Sterling Bank was increased to $20,000,000 and the maturity was extended to June 2007. |
(2) | In March 2006, the revolving note agreement with Atlantic Bank was increased to $6,000,000, and in August 2006 the maturity was extended to August 2007. |
(3) | In July 2006, the loans with Atlantic Bank and Israel Discount Bank, which had matured, were extended until August 2009. |
(4) | In December 2006, a $125,000,000 line of credit was established with Citibank, which matures in December 2009. In January and September 2006, the Merrill Lynch line of credit was further amended and extended for an additional two years to September 2008, with the committed amount adjusting to $375,000,000. |
(5) | In September 2006, the SBA approved a $6,000,000 commitment for Freshstart to issue additional debentures to the SBA during a four year period upon payment of a 1% fee and the infusion of $2,000,000 of additional capital by us. In March 2006, the SBA approved a $13,500,000 commitment for Medallion Capital to issue additional debentures to the SBA during a ten year period upon payment of a 1% fee and the infusion of $6,750,000 of additional capital by the Company. |
Loan amortization, prepayments, and sales also provide a source of funding for us. Prepayments on loans are influenced significantly by general interest rates, medallion loan market values, economic conditions, and competition. We believe that our credit facilities with Merrill Lynch and Citibank, deposits generated at Medallion Bank, and cash flow from operations (after distributions to shareholders) will be adequate to fund the continuing operations of our loan portfolio. Also, Medallion Bank is not a RIC, and therefore is able to retain earnings to finance growth.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which includes an amendment to SFAS No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS 158). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position the funded status of a benefit plan; (b) measure defined benefit plan
48
Table of Contents
assets and obligations as of the end of the employers fiscal year (with limited exceptions); and (c) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs pursuant to prior existing guidance, as an adjustment to amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. The provisions governing recognition of the funded status of a defined benefit plan and related disclosures are effective as of the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006 and not before June 16, 2007. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No.157, Fair Value Measurement. This statement defines fair values, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We currently follow fair market value accounting in its consolidated financial statements as a RIC; hence we do not expect the adoption of SFAS No.157 to have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting For Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The interpretation sets a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for recognizing tax positions in a company's financial statements based on a determination whether it is likely or not that the tax position would withstand a tax audit, without regard for the likelihood of a tax audit taking place. Assuming a position meets the more-likely-than-not threshold, the interpretation also prescribes a measurement attribute requiring determination of how much of the tax position would ultimately be allowed if challenged. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of SFAS Nos. 133 and 140. This statement permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are free standing derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that require bifurcation, clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives, and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, as defined. We do not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our business activities contain elements of risk. We consider the principal types of risk to be fluctuations in interest rates and portfolio valuations. We consider the management of risk essential to conducting our businesses. Accordingly, our risk management systems and procedures are designed to identify and analyze our risks, to set appropriate policies and limits and to continually monitor these risks and limits by means of reliable administrative and information systems and other policies and programs.
We value our portfolio at fair value as determined in good faith by management and approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with our valuation policy. Unlike certain lending institutions, we are not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, we must value each individual investment and portfolio loan on a quarterly basis. We record unrealized depreciation on investments and loans when it believes that an asset has been impaired and full collection is unlikely. We record unrealized appreciation on equities if it has a clear indication that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, our equity investment has also appreciated in value. Without a readily ascertainable market value, the estimated value of our portfolio of investments and loans may differ significantly from the values that would be placed on the portfolio if there existed a ready market for the investments. We adjust the valuation of the portfolio quarterly to reflect managements estimate of the current fair value of each investment in the portfolio. Any changes in estimated fair value are recorded in our statement of operations as net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments. Our investments in Medallion Bank and Medallion Taxi Media, as wholly owned portfolio investments, were also subject to quarterly assessments of fair value. We conduct a thorough valuation analysis as described previously, and determine whether any factors give rise to valuation different than recorded book value, including various regulatory restrictions that were established at Medallion Banks inception, by the FDIC and State of Utah, and also by additional marketplace restrictions, such as on the ability to transfer industrial bank charters. As a result of this valuation process, we used Medallion Banks and Medallion Taxi Medias actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the results as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, although changes in these restrictions and other applicable factors could change these conclusions in the future.
49
Table of Contents
In addition, the illiquidity of our loan portfolio and investments may adversely affect our ability to dispose of loans at times when it may be advantageous for us to liquidate such portfolio or investments. In addition, if we were required to liquidate some or all of the investments in the portfolio, the proceeds of such liquidation may be significantly less than the current value of such investments. Because we borrow money to make loans and investments, our net operating income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these funds. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our interest income. In periods of sharply rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which would reduce our net operating income before net realized and unrealized gains. We use a combination of long-term and short-term borrowings and equity capital to finance our investing activities. Our long-term fixed-rate investments are financed primarily with short-term floating-rate debt, and to a lesser extent by term fixed-rate debt. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. We have analyzed the potential impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Assuming that the balance sheet were to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate sensitivity, and including the impact on Medallion Bank, a hypothetical immediate 1% change in interest rates would have positively impacted net increase in net assets resulting from operations as of December 31, 2006 by approximately $399,000 on an annualized basis, compared to a negative impact of ($100,000) as of December 31, 2005, and the impact of such an immediate 1% change over a one year period would have been ($2,334,000), compared to ($753,000) for 2005. Although management believes that this measure is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential changes in credit quality, size and composition of the assets on the balance sheet, and other business developments that could affect net increase in net assets resulting from operations in a particular quarter or for the year taken as a whole. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the potential outcome simulated by these estimates.
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Reference is made to the financial statements set forth under Item 15 (A) (1) in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which financial statements are incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 8.
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES |
None.
ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this annual report. As a result of the material weakness described below, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2006.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the fourth quarter of 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such material change during the fourth quarter of 2006.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected our Board of
50
Table of Contents
Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:
| Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets |
| Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
| Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment and those criteria, management believes that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 due to the existence of the material weakness described below.
We concluded that there were ineffective policies and procedures by management relating to the documentation and oversight of the monitoring of certain of the loans and/or investments included in the portfolio of one of our subsidiaries, Medallion Capital. This deficiency resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected. We have taken action to remediate the material weakness described above. Our remediation, however was not complete at December 31, 2006. We have taken action to remediate this material weakness as follows:
| Implemented an enhanced review, monitoring, and reporting process to include additional documentation requirements to ensure that early detection and prevention of a potential impairment in value of an investment and changes in investment value, if any, are properly documented and reviewed; |
| Formalized communication channels between the management of Medallion Capital and us relating to the monitoring of loans and/or investments included in the Medallion Capital portfolio. |
Notwithstanding the above-mentioned material weakness, we believe that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly represent our consolidated financial position as of December 31, 2006, and consolidated results of operations for the year then ended.
Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Weiser LLP, has audited and issued a report on managements assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. The report of Weiser LLP appears below.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Medallion Financial Corp.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Medallion Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (the Company) did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, because of the effect of the material weakness identified in managements assessment, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A Companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weakness has been identified and included in managements assessment. The Companys documentation and oversight of the monitoring of certain of the loans and/or investments included in the portfolio of one of the Companys subsidiaries, Medallion Capital, Inc. was inadequate. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, and this report does not affect our report dated March 28, 2007 on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet including the consolidated schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for the year then ended, and our report dated March 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Weiser LLP
New York, New York
March 28, 2007
51
Table of Contents
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement expected to be filed by April 16, 2007 for its fiscal year 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions Directors and Executive Officers of the Company and Corporate Governance.
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement expected to be filed by April 16, 2007 for our fiscal year 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption Executive Compensation.
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement expected to be filed by April 16, 2007 for our fiscal year 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Equity Compensation Plan Information.
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement expected to be filed by April 16, 2007 for our fiscal year 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement expect to be filed by April 16, 2007 for our fiscal year 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
52
Table of Contents
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(A) 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial statements of Medallion Financial Corp. and the Report of Independent Public Accountants thereon are included as set forth on the Index to Financial Statements on F-1.
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
See Index to Financial Statements on F-1.
3. EXHIBITS
Number | Description | ||
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 3, 2004, between Medallion Financial Corp., Medallion Taxi Media, Inc., Clear Channel Communications, Inc., and Checker Acquisition Corp. Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 10, 2004 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | ||
2.2 | Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 17, 2005, by and among Medallion Financial Corp., Business Lenders, LLC, and BLL Acquisition LLC. Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 18, 2005 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | ||
3.1 | (a) | Restated Medallion Financial Corp. Certificate of Incorporation. Filed as Exhibit 2(a) to the Company's Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-1670) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
3.1 | (b) | Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Filed as Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
3.2 | Restated By-Laws. Filed as Exhibit (b) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-1670) and incorporated by reference herein. | ||
4.1 | Third Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated September 5, 2006, by Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I, in favor of Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | ||
4.2 | Amended and Restated Revolving Secured Line of Credit Promissory Note, dated March 6, 2006, by Medallion Funding Corp., in favor of Atlantic Bank of New York. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | ||
4.3 | Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Secured Line of Credit Promissory Note, dated August 1, 2006, by Medallion Funding Corp., in favor of Atlantic Bank of New York. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 4, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | ||
4.4 | Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Revolving Secured Line of Credit Promissory Note, dated January 16, 2007, by Medallion Funding Corp., in favor of New York Commercial Bank, formerly known as Atlantic Bank of New York. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 17, 2007 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | ||
4.5 | Substitute Revolving Credit Note, dated August 14, 2006, by Medallion Financial Corp., in favor of Sterling National Bank. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. |
53
Table of Contents
4.5 | Promissory Note, dated December 19, 2006, by Taxi Medallion Loan Trust II, in favor of Citicorp North America, Inc. (the Managing Agent) for the benefit of the lenders in the Managing Agents related lender group. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.1 | First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, between Medallion Financial Corp. and Alvin Murstein dated May 29, 1998. Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein.* | |
10.2 | First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, between Medallion Financial Corp. and Andrew Murstein dated May 29, 1998. Filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein.* | |
10.3 | Employment Agreement, dated August 3, 2006, by and between Medallion Financial Corp. and Michael Kowalsky. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 4, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein.* | |
10.3 | Medallion Financial Corp. Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein.* | |
10.4 | Medallion Financial Corp. Amended and Restated 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit A to the Companys Request Form on Amendment and the Order by the Commission approving the plan as of April 3, 2000 (File No. 812-11800) and incorporated by reference herein.* | |
10.5 | 2006 Employee Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit II to our definitive proxy statement for our 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed on April 28, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein.* | |
10.6 | Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Sheet. Filed herewith.* | |
10.7 | Indenture of Lease, dated October 31, 1997, by and between Sage Realty Corporation, as Agent and Landlord, and Medallion Financial Corp., as Tenant. Filed as Exhibit 10.64 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.8 | First Amendment of Lease, dated September 6, 2005, by and between Medallion Financial Corp. and Sage Realty Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 12, 2005 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.9 | Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 13, 2003, by and among Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.10 | Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 12, 2004, by and between Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.11 | Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 7, 2005, by and between Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 11, 2005 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.12 | Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 9, 2006, by and between Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 11, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.13 | Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated September 5, 2006, by and between Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. |
54
Table of Contents
10.14 | Amendment No. 5 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 19, 2006, by and between Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.15 | Loan and Sale Contribution Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2002, between Medallion Financial Corp. and Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2002 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.16 | Loan Sale and Exchange Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2002, between Medallion Financial Corp. and Medallion Funding Corp. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2002 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.17 | Servicing Agreement, by and among Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I, Medallion Funding Corp., and Merrill Lynch Bank USA, dated as of September 13, 2002. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2002 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.18 | Amendment to Servicing Agreement, by and among Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I, Medallion Funding Corp. and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. as successor in interest to Merrill Lynch Bank USA, dated as of September 12, 2003. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.19 | Amendment No. 2 to Servicing Agreement, by and among Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I, Medallion Funding Corp. and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. as successor in interest to Merrill Lynch Bank USA, dated as of September 1, 2004. Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.20 | Custodial Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2002, among the lenders thereto, Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I, Medallion Funding Corp. and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2002 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.21 | Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2002, by and between Medallion Funding Corp. and Wachovia Trust Company, N.A. Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2002 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.22 | Amendment to Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated December 19, 2006, by and between Medallion Funding Corp. and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as successor-in-interest to Wachovia Trust Company, N.A. Filed herewith. | |
10.23 | Loan and Security Agreement, dated April 26, 2004, by and between Medallion Financial Corp. and Sterling National Bank. Filed herewith. Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.24 | First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2005, by and between Medallion Financial Corp. and Sterling National Bank. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.25 | Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 14, 2006, by and between Medallion Financial Corp. and Sterling National Bank. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.26 | Commitment Letter, dated March 1, 2006, by the Small Business Administration to Medallion Capital, Inc., accepted and agreed to by Medallion Capital, Inc. on March 8, 2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.27 | Commitment Letter, dated September 20, 2006, by the Small Business Administration to Freshstart Venture Capital Corp., accepted and agreed to by Freshstart Venture Capital Corp. on October 10, 2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 11, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. |
55
Table of Contents
10.28 | Loan And Security Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2006, among Taxi Medallion Loan Trust II, the persons from time to time party thereto as Conduit Lenders, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto as Committed Lenders, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto as Managing Agents, and Citicorp North America, Inc., as Administrative Agent. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.29 | Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2006, among Medallion Funding Corp., Taxi Medallion Loan Trust II, and Citicorp North America, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.30 | Loan Sale and Contribution Agreement, dated December 19, 2006, by and between Medallion Funding Corp. and Taxi Medallion Loan Trust II. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
10.31 | Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2006, by and between Medallion Funding Corp. and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2006 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
12.1 | Computation of ratio of debt to equity. Filed herewith. | |
16.1 | Letter, dated June 3, 2005, from Eisner LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission, regarding change in certifying accountant of Medallion Financial Corp. Filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2005 (File No. 814-00188) and incorporated by reference herein. | |
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries of Medallion Financial Corp. Filed herewith. | |
23.1 | Consent of Weiser LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, related to reports on financial statements of Medallion Financial Corp. and Medallion Bank. Filed herewith. | |
23.2 | Consent of Eisner LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, related to report on financial statements of Medallion Financial Corp. and Medallion Bank. Filed herewith. | |
31.1 | Certification of Alvin Murstein pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. | |
31.2 | Certification of Larry D. Hall pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. | |
32.1 | Certification of Alvin Murstein pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. | |
32.2 | Certification of Larry D. Hall pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
* | Compensatory plan or arrangement required to be identified pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
IMPORTANT INFORMATION RELATING TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements so long as those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in such statements. In connection with certain forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K and those that may be made in the future by us or on our behalf, we note that there are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in any such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K were prepared by management and are qualified by, and subject to, significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory, and other uncertainties and contingencies, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower. The statements have not been audited by, examined by, compiled by, or subjected to agreed-upon procedures by independent accountants, and no third-party has independently verified or reviewed such statements. Readers of this Form 10-K should consider these facts in evaluating the information contained herein. In addition, our business and operations are subject to substantial risks which increase the uncertainty inherent in the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K. The inclusion of the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K should not be regarded as a representation by us or that of any other person that the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K will be achieved. In light of the foregoing, readers of this Form 10-K are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained herein. These risks and others that are detailed in this Form 10-K and other documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and any current reports on Form 8-K must be considered by any of our investors or potential investors.
56
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of Act of 1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP. | ||
Date: | March 27, 2007 | |
By: | /s/ Alvin Murstein | |
Alvin Murstein Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
57
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signatures |
Title |
Date | ||
/s/ Alvin Murstein Alvin Murstein |
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ Larry D. Hall Larry D. Hall |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ Andrew M. Murstein Andrew M. Murstein |
President and Director | March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ Henry L. Aaron Henry L. Aaron |
Director | March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ Mario M. Cuomo Mario M. Cuomo |
Director | March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ Henry D. Jackson Henry D. Jackson |
Director | March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ Stanley Kreitman Stanley Kreitman |
Director | March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ Frederick A. Menowitz Frederick A. Menowitz |
Director | March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ David L. Rudnick David L. Rudnick |
Director | March 27, 2007 | ||
/s/ Lowell P. Weicker, Jr. Lowell P. Weicker, Jr. |
Director | March 27, 2007 |
58
Table of Contents
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-1
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Medallion Financial Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Medallion Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (the Company), including the schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, cash flows and the selected financial ratios and other data (see note 15) for the years ended. These financial statements and selected financial ratios and other data are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and selected financial ratios and other data based on our audits. The selected ratios and other data for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been audited by other auditors, whose report dated March 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on such selected ratios and other data.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and the selected financial ratios and other data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of their operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-based Payment applying the modified prospective method at the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2006.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company determined not to consolidate the accounts of a previously consolidated subsidiary, Medallion Bank and has recast such consolidated financial statements and schedule of investments for a change in the reporting entity. The effect of recasting the consolidated financial statements is to present Medallion Bank as a portfolio investment at fair market value and to reflect the changes in fair value of the investment rather than consolidate the accounts of Medallion Bank, which had no impact on net increase in net assets resulting from operations or basic or diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share. Accordingly, our report dated February 21, 2006, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 prior to the retrospective change described in Note 3 has been superceded.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework Issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness.
Weiser LLP New York, New York March 28, 2007 |
F-2
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Medallion Financial Corp.
We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows and the selected ratios and other data (Note 15) of Medallion Financial Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements and the selected ratios and other data are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the selected ratios and other data based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and the selected ratios and other data are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), prior to the change in the reporting entity described in Note 3, the consolidated balance sheet of Medallion Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows and the selected ratios and other data for the year then ended, (not presented herein) and in our report dated March 25, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. As described more fully in Note 3, the Company has recast its 2004 financial statements to present its wholly-owned bank as a portfolio investment at fair value and to reflect the changes in fair value of the investment rather than consolidate the accounts of the bank. Accordingly, our report dated March 25, 2005, relating to our audit of the financial statements and the selected ratios and other data as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 prior to the retrospective change described in Note 3 has been superseded.
In our opinion, the financial statements and the selected ratios and other data referred to in the first paragraph present fairly, in all material respects the consolidated results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows and the selected ratios and other data of Medallion Financial Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Florham Park, New Jersey
March 28, 2007
F-3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(As adjusted) | (As adjusted) | |||||||||||
Interest income on investments |
$ | 38,031,949 | $ | 33,649,871 | $ | 24,036,090 | ||||||
Dividends and interest income on short-term investments |
1,059,099 | 696,309 | 362,363 | |||||||||
Medallion lease income |
543,867 | 464,750 | 434,315 | |||||||||
Total investment income |
39,634,915 | 34,810,930 | 24,832,768 | |||||||||
Interest on floating rate borrowings |
19,208,815 | 13,398,536 | 8,916,607 | |||||||||
Interest on fixed rate borrowings |
4,981,488 | 4,598,713 | 3,917,219 | |||||||||
Total interest expense(1) |
24,190,303 | 17,997,249 | 12,833,826 | |||||||||
Net interest income |
15,444,612 | 16,813,681 | 11,998,942 | |||||||||
Gain on sales of loans |
| 884,608 | 904,074 | |||||||||
Other income |
2,646,574 | 3,853,094 | 3,430,056 | |||||||||
Total noninterest income |
2,646,574 | 4,737,702 | 4,334,130 | |||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
8,192,731 | 9,554,489 | 8,441,822 | |||||||||
Professional fees |
1,955,521 | 1,945,153 | 1,406,779 | |||||||||
Rent expense |
1,265,933 | 1,338,492 | 1,243,826 | |||||||||
Other operating expenses |
3,511,616 | 4,145,573 | 4,990,832 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
14,925,801 | 16,983,707 | 16,083,259 | |||||||||
Net investment income before income taxes(2) |
3,165,385 | 4,567,676 | 249,813 | |||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit |
| 13,924 | (258,900 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income (loss) after income taxes |
3,165,385 | 4,581,600 | (9,087 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
3,079,718 | 3,606,119 | 2,329,053 | |||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(591,405 | ) | (6,338,641 | ) | 19,848,704 | |||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
7,454,321 | 5,012,424 | 343,359 | |||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
6,862,916 | (1,326,217 | ) | 20,192,063 | ||||||||
Net realized/unrealized gains on investments |
9,942,634 | 2,279,902 | 22,521,116 | |||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 13,108,019 | $ | 6,861,502 | $ | 22,512,029 | ||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.76 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 1.25 | ||||||
Diluted |
0.74 | 0.39 | 1.22 | |||||||||
Dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.37 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
||||||||||||
Basic |
17,293,665 | 17,087,034 | 18,001,604 | |||||||||
Diluted |
17,761,039 | 17,552,228 | 18,424,518 | |||||||||
(1) | Average borrowings outstanding were $425,062,000, $377,874,000, and $282,120,000, and the related average borrowings costs were 5.69%, 4.76%, and 4.54% for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. |
(2) | Includes $1,890,775, $1,752,544, and $1,393,282 of net revenues received from Medallion Bank for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 primarily for servicing fees, loan origination fees, and expense reimbursements. See note 12 for additional information. |
The accompanying notes and independent auditors report should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||
(As adjusted) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Medallion loans, at fair value |
$ | 428,248,589 | $ | 375,263,403 | ||||
Commercial loans, at fair value |
88,206,661 | 91,485,479 | ||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries, at fair value |
50,448,032 | 40,335,393 | ||||||
Equity investments, at fair value |
16,068,243 | 23,137,661 | ||||||
Investment securities, at fair value |
9,961,111 | | ||||||
Net investments ($405,817,000 at December 31, 2006 and $380,267,000 at December 31, 2005 pledged as collateral under borrowing arrangements) |
592,932,636 | 530,221,936 | ||||||
Cash ($865,000 at December 31, 2006 and $574,000 December 31, 2005 restricted as to use by lender) |
15,398,740 | 22,808,388 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
2,177,694 | 2,383,083 | ||||||
Fixed assets, net |
525,472 | 454,659 | ||||||
Goodwill, net |
5,007,583 | 5,007,583 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
15,562,763 | 12,479,159 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 631,604,888 | $ | 573,354,808 | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 5,057,204 | $ | 4,326,282 | ||||
Accrued interest payable |
1,783,258 | 1,759,737 | ||||||
Floating rate borrowings |
377,886,424 | 323,664,950 | ||||||
Fixed rate borrowings |
77,250,000 | 77,250,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
461,976,886 | 407,000,969 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||
Shareholders equity (net assets) |
||||||||
Preferred Stock (1,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value stock authorized - none outstanding) |
| | ||||||
Common stock (50,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value stock authorized 18,799,766 shares at December 31, 2006 and 18,546,648 shares at December 31, 2005 issued) |
187,998 | 185,271 | ||||||
Treasury stock at cost (1,373,351 shares at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005) |
(12,611,113 | ) | (12,611,113 | ) | ||||
Capital in excess of par value |
176,849,296 | 175,259,730 | ||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss) |
5,198,189 | 12,184,268 | ||||||
Accumulated undistributed net realized gains on investments |
| | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
3,632 | (8,664,317 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders equity (net assets) |
169,628,002 | 166,353,839 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 631,604,888 | $ | 573,354,808 | ||||
Number of common shares outstanding |
17,426,415 | 17,173,297 | ||||||
Net asset value per share |
$ | 9.73 | $ | 9.69 | ||||
The accompanying notes and independent auditors report should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) after income taxes |
$ | 3,165,385 | $ | 4,581,600 | $ | (9,087 | ) | |||||
Net realized gains on investments |
3,079,718 | 3,606,119 | 2,329,053 | |||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
6,862,916 | (1,326,217 | ) | 20,192,063 | ||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
13,108,019 | 6,861,502 | 22,512,029 | |||||||||
Investment income, net |
(6,049,535 | ) | (4,894,078 | ) | (2,582,055 | ) | ||||||
Realized gain from investment transactions, net |
(5,376,614 | ) | (3,633,069 | ) | (3,351,572 | ) | ||||||
Dividends and distributions to shareholders(1) |
(11,426,149 | ) | (8,527,147 | ) | (5,933,627 | ) | ||||||
Exercise of stock options |
1,592,293 | 1,166,830 | 264,598 | |||||||||
Treasury stock acquired |
| (3,608,731 | ) | (8,570,798 | ) | |||||||
Capital share transactions |
1,592,293 | (2,441,901 | ) | (8,306,200 | ) | |||||||
Cumulative effect of foreign currency translation |
| | 72,861 | |||||||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
3,274,163 | (4,107,546 | ) | 8,345,063 | ||||||||
Net assets at the beginning of the year |
166,353,839 | 170,461,385 | 162,116,322 | |||||||||
Net assets at the end of the year(2) |
$ | 169,628,002 | $ | 166,353,839 | $ | 170,461,385 | ||||||
Capital share activity |
||||||||||||
Common stock authorized, beginning of year |
18,546,648 | 18,328,450 | 18,273,112 | |||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
253,118 | 218,198 | 55,338 | |||||||||
Common stock authorized, end of year |
18,799,766 | 18,546,648 | 18,328,450 | |||||||||
Treasury stock, beginning of year |
(1,373,351 | ) | (983,451 | ) | (30,934 | ) | ||||||
Treasury stock acquired |
| (389,900 | ) | (952,517 | ) | |||||||
Treasury stock, end of year |
(1,373,351 | ) | (1,373,351 | ) | (983,451 | ) | ||||||
Common stock outstanding |
17,426,415 | 17,173,297 | 17,344,999 | |||||||||
(1) | Dividends declared were $0.66, $0.50, and $0.33 per share for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. |
(2) | Includes $1,368,000 of undistributed net investment income at December 31, 2006. |
The accompanying notes and independent auditors report should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(As adjusted) | (As adjusted) | |||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 13,108,019 | $ | 6,861,502 | $ | 22,512,029 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
415,412 | 579,383 | 591,830 | |||||||||
Amortization of origination costs |
509,684 | 1,480,468 | 1,489,440 | |||||||||
Increase in net unrealized depreciation on investments |
591,405 | 6,338,641 | 5,140,294 | |||||||||
Increase in unrealized appreciation on Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
(7,454,321 | ) | (5,012,424 | ) | (343,359 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gains on investments |
(3,079,718 | ) | (3,606,119 | ) | (2,329,053 | ) | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
342,024 | | | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable |
205,389 | (763,450 | ) | (34,612 | ) | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets, net |
(2,019,252 | ) | 881,328 | 1,777,214 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
731,433 | (3,825,039 | ) | 942,181 | ||||||||
Increase in accrued interest payable |
23,521 | 3,281 | 559,208 | |||||||||
Gain on sales of loans |
| (884,608 | ) | (904,074 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in servicing fee receivable |
| 182,957 | 786,428 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of Media |
| | (24,989,099 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
3,373,596 | 2,235,920 | 5,198,427 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Investments originated |
(309,760,483 | ) | (279,545,011 | ) | (190,032,559 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from principal receipts, sales, and maturities of investments |
293,920,109 | 212,094,347 | 150,762,503 | |||||||||
Banco portfolio acquisition |
(35,703,391 | ) | | | ||||||||
Investments in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries, net |
(2,658,319 | ) | (901,904 | ) | (10,792,471 | ) | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
(486,224 | ) | (350,579 | ) | (250,357 | ) | ||||||
Cash received for sold BLL SBA Section 7 (a) loans |
| 20,472,386 | | |||||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(54,688,308 | ) | (48,230,761 | ) | (50,312,884 | ) | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from floating rate borrowings |
269,655,946 | 130,431,933 | 165,493,591 | |||||||||
Repayments of floating rate borrowings |
(215,434,472 | ) | (81,727,539 | ) | (121,052,737 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from fixed rate borrowings |
| 12,815,000 | 7,500,000 | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
1,244,739 | 1,166,830 | 264,598 | |||||||||
Payments of declared dividends |
(11,426,149 | ) | (8,527,147 | ) | (5,933,627 | ) | ||||||
Commitment fees on SBA leverage |
(135,000 | ) | | | ||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock at cost |
| (3,608,731 | ) | (8,570,798 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
43,905,064 | 50,550,346 | 37,701,027 | |||||||||
NET INCREASE / (DECREASE) IN CASH |
(7,409,648 | ) | 4,555,505 | (7,413,430 | ) | |||||||
CASH, beginning of year |
22,808,388 | 18,252,883 | 25,666,313 | |||||||||
CASH, end of year |
$ | 15,398,740 | $ | 22,808,388 | $ | 18,252,883 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for interest |
$ | 23,713,195 | $ | 16,802,132 | $ | 12,670,156 | ||||||
Cash paid during the year for income taxes |
| | 717,169 | |||||||||
Non-cash investing activities-net transfers to (from) other assets |
| 3,582,394 | 1,439,831 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes and independent auditors report should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(1) ORGANIZATION OF MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) is a closed-end management investment company organized as a Delaware corporation. The Company has elected to be regulated as a Business Development Company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Company conducts its business through various wholly-owned subsidiaries including its primary operating company, Medallion Funding Corp. (MFC), a Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) which originates and services taxicab medallion and commercial loans. As an adjunct to the Company's taxicab medallion finance business, the Company had wholly owned portfolio investments which conducted taxicab rooftop advertising through two subsidiaries, the primary operator Medallion Taxi Media, Inc. (Media), and a small operating subsidiary in Japan (MMJ), (together MTM). During the 2004 third quarter, Media was merged with and into a subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (CCU), and MMJ was sold in a stock sale to its management. (See Note 4).
The Company also conducts business through Medallion Business Credit, LLC (MBC), an originator of loans to small businesses for the purpose of financing inventory and receivables; Medallion Capital, Inc. (MCI), an SBIC which conducts a mezzanine financing business; and Freshstart Venture Capital Corp. (FSVC), an SBIC which originates and services taxicab medallion and commercial loans. MFC, MCI, and FSVC, as SBICs, are regulated and financed in part by the SBA. Until October 2005, the Company also conducted business through Business Lenders, LLC (BLL), licensed under the Small Business Administration (SBA) Section 7(a) program. On October 17, 2005, the Company completed the sale of the loan portfolio and related assets of BLL. In connection with this transaction, the Company sold assets in the amount of $22,799,000, less liabilities assumed by the buyer in the amount of $2,327,000. The assets were sold at book value, and therefore no gain or loss, excluding transaction costs, was recognized as a result of this transaction. For 2005, BLL generated net decease in net assets resulting from operations of $1,003,000, compared to a net decrease of $419,000 for 2004, and BLLs net investment loss after taxes was $696,000, compared to a loss of $201,000 in 2004
In December 2006, MFC established a wholly-owned subsidiary, Taxi Medallion Loan Trust II (Trust II), for the purpose of owning medallion loans originated by MFC or others. Trust II is a separate legal and corporate entity with its own creditors who, in any liquidation of Trust II, will be entitled to be satisfied out of Trust IIs assets prior to any value in Trust II becoming available to Trust IIs equity holders. The assets of Trust II, aggregating $71,884,000 at December 31, 2006, are not available to pay obligations of its affiliates or any other party, and the assets of affiliates or any other party are not available to pay obligations of Trust II. Trust IIs loans are serviced by MFC.
In September 2006, and previously in June 2003, MFC established several wholly-owned subsidiaries which, along with an existing subsidiary (together, Medallion Chicago), purchased certain City of Chicago taxicab medallions which are leased to fleet operators while being held for long-term appreciation in value.
A wholly-owned portfolio investment of ours, Medallion Bank (MB), a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured industrial bank that originates medallion loans, commercial loans, and consumer loans, raises deposits, and conducts other banking activities (see notes 3 and 4). MB was capitalized on December 16, 2003, with $22,000,000 from the Company. On December 22, 2003, upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the FDICs order of October 2, 2003 approving MBs application for federal deposit insurance, the FDIC certified that the deposits of each depositor in MB were insured to the maximum amount provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and MB opened for business. MB is subject to competition from other financial institutions and to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies, and undergoes examinations by those agencies.
MB is not an investment company, and therefore, is not consolidated with the Company, but instead is treated as a portfolio investment. It was initially formed for the primary purpose of originating commercial loans in three categories: 1) loans to finance the purchase of taxicab medallions (licenses), 2) asset-based commercial loans, and 3) SBA 7(a) loans. The loans are marketed and serviced by MBs affiliates who have extensive prior experience in these asset groups. The Company sold substantially all of the Section 7(a) loans in its portfolio in connection with the sale of the assets of BLL to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch in October 2005. Additionally, MB began issuing brokered certificates of deposit in January 2004, and purchased over $84,150,000 of taxicab medallion and asset-based loans from affiliates of the Company. On April 1, 2004, MB purchased a consumer loan portfolio with a principal amount of $84,875,000, net of $4,244,000, or 5.0%, of unrealized depreciation, from an unrelated financial institution for consideration of $86,309,000. The purchase was funded with $7,700,000 of additional capital contributed by the Company and with deposits raised by MB. The purchase included a premium of approximately $5,678,000 to the book value of assets acquired, which MB amortizes to interest income over the expected life of the acquired loans, and which is carried in other assets on MBs balance sheets.
F-8
Table of Contents
In September 2002, MFC established a wholly-owned subsidiary, Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I (Trust), for the purpose of owning medallion loans originated by MFC or others. The Trust is a separate legal and corporate entity with its own creditors who, in any liquidation of the Trust, will be entitled to be satisfied out of the Trusts assets prior to any value in the Trust becoming available to the Trusts equity holders. The assets of the Trust, aggregating $327,202,000 at December 31, 2006 and $344,594,000 at December 31, 2005, are not available to pay obligations of its affiliates or any other party, and the assets of affiliates or any other party are not available to pay obligations of the Trust. The Trusts loans are serviced by MFC.
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the US and general practices in the investment company industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the US requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reporting and disclosure of assets and liabilities, including those that are of a contingent nature, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates are subject to change over time, and actual results could differ from those estimates. The determination of fair value of the Companys investments is subject to significant change within one year.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, except for MB and MTM. All significant intercompany transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. As non-investment companies, MB and MTM are not consolidated with the Company, which is an investment company under the 1940 Act. See Note 3 regarding the 2006 change in reporting entity, and note 4 for the presentation of financial information for MB and MTM. Because of the change in the reporting entity described in note 3, our financial condition and results of operations included in this annual report for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, including for any interim periods presented, have been adjusted to reflect the change retrospectively for all periods and information presented.
Investment Valuation
The Companys loans, net of participations and any unearned discount, are considered investments under the 1940 Act and are recorded at fair value. As part of the fair value methodology, loans are valued at cost adjusted for any unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Since no ready market exists for these loans, the fair value is determined in good faith by management, and approved by the Board of Directors. In determining the fair value, the Company and Board of Directors consider factors such as the financial condition of the borrower, the adequacy of the collateral, individual credit risks, historical loss experience, and the relationships between current and projected market rates and portfolio rates of interest and maturities.
Equity investments (common stock and stock warrants, including certain controlled subsidiary portfolio investments) and investment securities (mortgage backed bonds), in total representing 13% and 12% of the investment portfolio at December 31, 2006 and 2005, are recorded at fair value, represented as cost, plus or minus unrealized appreciation or depreciation, respectively. The fair value of investments that have no ready market are determined in good faith by management, and approved by the Board of Directors, based upon assets and revenues of the underlying investee companies as well as general market trends for businesses in the same industry. Included in equity investments were marketable securities of $15,966,000 and $23,031,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and non-marketable securities of $50,590,000 and $40,442,000 in the respective years, which included $50,448,000 and $40,335,000, respectively, related to portfolio investments in controlled subsidiaries. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuations, managements estimates of the values of the investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and the differences could be material.
Our investments in Medallion Bank and Medallion Taxi Media, as wholly owned portfolio investments, were also subject to quarterly assessments of fair value. We conduct a thorough valuation analysis as described previously, and determine whether any factors give rise to valuation different than recorded book value, including various regulatory restrictions that were established at Medallion Banks inception, by the FDIC and State of Utah, and also by additional marketplace restrictions, such as on the ability to
F-9
Table of Contents
transfer industrial bank charters. As a result of this valuation process, we used Medallion Banks and Medallion Taxi Medias actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the results as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, although changes in these restrictions and other applicable factors could change these conclusions in the future. See Note 4.
A majority of the Companys investments consist of long-term loans to persons defined by SBA regulations as socially or economically disadvantaged, or to entities that are at least 50% owned by such persons. Approximately 72% and 71% of the Company's investment portfolio at December 31, 2006 and 2005 had arisen in connection with the financing of taxicab medallions, taxicabs, and related assets, of which 79% and 76% were in New York City at December 31, 2006 and 2005. These loans are secured by the medallions, taxicabs, and related assets, and are personally guaranteed by the borrowers, or in the case of corporations, are generally guaranteed personally by the owners. A portion of the Companys portfolio (15% and 17% at December 31, 2006 and 2005) represents loans to various commercial enterprises, in a variety of industries, including wholesaling, food services, financing, broadcasting, communications, real estate, and lodging. These loans are made primarily in the metropolitan New York City area, and historically included loans guaranteed by the SBA under its Section 7(a) program, less the sale of the guaranteed portion of those loans. The Company sold substantially all of the Section 7(a) loans in its portfolio in connection with the sale of the assets of BLL to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch in October 2005. Investments in controlled unconsolidated subsidiaries, equity investments, and investment securities, were 8%, 3%, and 2% at December 31, 2006, compared to 8%, 4%, and 0% at December 31, 2005.
On a managed basis, which includes the investments of MB after eliminating the Companys investment in MB and other controlled subsidiaries , medallion loans were 63% and 62% at December 31, 2006 and 2005 (82% and 78% in New York City), commercial loans were 18% and 20%, and 13% and 12% were consumer loans in all 50 states collateralized by recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers. Equity investments and investment securities were 2% and 4% at December 31, 2006, and were 3% each at December 31, 2005.
Investment Transactions and Income Recognition
Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the yield of the related loans. At December 31, 2006, and 2005, net origination costs totaled approximately $631,000 and $960,000. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $510,000, $1,480,000, and $1,489,000.
Investment securities are purchased from time-to-time in the open market at prices that are greater or lesser than the par value of the investment. The resulting premium or discount is deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the yield of the related investment. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, there were no premiums or discounts on investment securities, and no income accretion or amortization for 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Taxicab medallion and commercial loans are placed on nonaccrual status, and all uncollected accrued interest is reversed, when there is doubt as to the collectibility of interest or principal, or if loans are 90 days or more past due, unless management has determined that they are both well-secured and in the process of collection. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is generally recognized when cash is received, unless a determination has been made to apply all cash receipts to principal. At December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, total non-accrual loans were approximately $13,670,000, $22,641,000, and $28,523,000, and represented 2%, 4%, and 5% of the gross medallion and commercial loan portfolio at each yearend. The amount of interest income on nonaccrual loans that would have been recognized if the loans had been paying in accordance with their original terms was approximately $5,281,000, $6,744,000, and $6,016,000 as of December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, of which $2,103,000, $2,904,000, and $2,812,000 would have been recognized in the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Loan Sales and Servicing Fee Receivable
The Company accounts for its sales of loans in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities - a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125 (SFAS 140). SFAS 140 provides accounting and reporting standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. The principal portion of loans serviced for others by the Company was approximately $168,463,000 and $138,524,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and included $153,271,000 and $129,391,000 of loans serviced for MB.
Gains or losses on loan sales were primarily attributable to the sale of commercial loans which had been at least partially guaranteed by the SBA, and was conducted by the Companys BLL subsidiary. The Company sold all of the SBA Section 7(a) loans in its portfolio in connection with the sale of the assets of BLL to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch in October 2005. The Company
F-10
Table of Contents
recognized gains or losses from the sale of the SBA-guaranteed portion of a loan at the date of the sales agreement when control of the future economic benefits embodied in the loan was surrendered. The gains were calculated in accordance with SFAS 140, which required that the gain on the sale of a portion of a loan be based on the relative fair values of the loan portion sold and the loan portion retained. The gain on loan sales was due to the differential between the carrying amount of the portion of loans sold and the sum of the cash received and the servicing fee receivable.
The servicing fee receivable represented the present value of the difference between the servicing fee received by the Company (generally 100 to 400 basis points) and the Companys servicing costs and normal profit, after considering the estimated effects of prepayments and defaults over the life of the servicing agreement. In connection with calculating the servicing fee receivable, the Company made certain assumptions including the cost of servicing a loan including a normal profit, the estimated life of the underlying loan that would be serviced, and the discount rate used in the present value calculation. The Company considered 40 basis points to be its cost plus a normal profit and used the note rate plus 100 basis points for loans with an original maturity of ten years or less, and the note rate plus 200 basis points for loans with an original maturity of greater than ten years as the discount rate. The note rate was generally the prime rate plus 2.75%.
The servicing fee receivable was amortized as a charge to loan servicing fee income over the estimated lives of the underlying loans using the effective interest rate method. The Company reviewed the carrying amount of the servicing fee receivable for possible impairment by stratifying the receivables based on one or more of the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying financial assets. The Company stratified its servicing fee receivable into pools, generally by the year of creation, and within those pools, by the term of the loan underlying the servicing fee receivable. If the estimated present value of the future servicing income was less than the carrying amount, the Company established an impairment reserve and adjusted future amortization accordingly. If the fair value exceeded the carrying value, the Company may have reduced future amortization. The servicing fee receivable was carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value.
The estimated net servicing income was based, in part, on managements estimate of prepayment speeds, including default rates, and accordingly, there was no assurance of the accuracy of these estimates. If the prepayment speeds occurred at a faster rate than anticipated, the amortization of the servicing asset would have been accelerated and its value would have declined; and as a result, servicing income during that and subsequent periods would have declined. If prepayments occurred slower than anticipated, cash flows would have exceeded estimated amounts and servicing income would have increased. The constant prepayment rates utilized by the Company in estimating the lives of the loans depended on the original term of the loan, industry trends, and the Companys historical data on prepayments and delinquencies, and ranged from 15% to 35%. The Company evaluated the temporary impairment to determine if any such temporary impairment would be considered to be permanent in nature. The prepayment rate of loans may have been affected by a variety of economic and other factors, including prevailing interest rates and the availability of alternative financing to borrowers.
The activity in the reserve for servicing fee receivable follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | | $ | 1,036,500 | $ | 1,037,500 | |||||
Reversal related to sale of servicing asset |
| (1,063,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | ||||||
Increases (decreases) charged to operations |
| 26,500 | | ||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,036,500 | |||||
The Company also had the option to sell the unguaranteed portions of loans to third party investors. The gain or loss on such sales was calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 140. The Company had no sales of unguaranteed portions of loans to third party investors for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. The Company sold substantially all of the Section 7(a) loans in its portfolio in connection with the sale of the assets of BLL to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch in October 2005.
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) and Realized Gains (Losses) on Investments
The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments is the amount by which the fair value estimated by the Company is greater (less) than the cost basis of the investment portfolio. Realized gains or losses on investments are generated through sales of investments, foreclosure on specific collateral, and writeoffs of loans or assets acquired in satisfaction of loans, net of recoveries. Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on net investments was $4,000, ($8,664,000), and ($7,618,000) as of December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Our investments in Medallion Bank and Medallion Taxi Media, as wholly owned portfolio investments, were
F-11
Table of Contents
also subject to quarterly assessments of fair value. We conduct a thorough valuation analysis as described previously, and determine whether any factors give rise to valuation different than recorded book value, including various regulatory restrictions that were established at Medallion Banks inception, by the FDIC and State of Utah, and also by additional marketplace restrictions, such as on the ability to transfer industrial bank charters. As a result of this valuation process, we used Medallion Banks and Medallion Taxi Medias actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the results as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, although changes in these restrictions and other applicable factors could change these conclusions in the future. See note 3 for change in the reporting entity and note 4 for the presentation of financial information for Medallion Bank and Medallion Taxi Media.
The following table sets forth the changes in our unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Loans | Equity Investments |
Foreclosed Properties |
Total | ||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2003 |
($7,917,791 | ) | $ | 287,045 | ($317,361 | ) | ($7,948,107 | ) | |||||||
Increase in unrealized |
|||||||||||||||
Appreciation on investments |
| 2,820,058 | | 2,820,058 | |||||||||||
Depreciation on investments |
(4,209,093 | ) | (2,429,333 | ) | (512,279 | ) | (7,150,705 | ) | |||||||
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized |
|||||||||||||||
Losses on investments |
3,335,740 | 7,588 | 317,359 | 3,660,687 | |||||||||||
Other (1) |
1,000,000 | | | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2004 |
(7,791,144 | ) | 685,358 | (512,281 | ) | (7,618,067 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in unrealized |
|||||||||||||||
Appreciation on investments |
157,693 | (520,105 | ) | | (362,412 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation on investments |
(1,924,733 | ) | (1,022,404 | ) | (1,123,136 | ) | (4,070,273 | ) | |||||||
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized |
|||||||||||||||
Gains on investments |
| 1,485,883 | | 1,485,883 | |||||||||||
Losses on investments |
308,870 | | 238,667 | 547,537 | |||||||||||
Reversal of reserves on sold SBA Section 7(a) loans |
1,339,875 | | | 1,339,875 | |||||||||||
Other |
13,140 | | | 13,140 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2005 |
(7,896,299 | ) | 628,732 | (1,396,750 | ) | (8,664,317 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in unrealized |
|||||||||||||||
Appreciation on investments |
| 4,235,738 | 920,206 | 5,155,944 | |||||||||||
Depreciation on investments |
824,037 | (172,978 | ) | | 651,059 | ||||||||||
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized |
|||||||||||||||
Gains on investments |
| (2,578,646 | ) | | (2,578,646 | ) | |||||||||
Losses on investments |
4,016,566 | | 1,423,026 | 5,439,592 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2006 |
($3,055,696 | ) | $ | 2,112,846 | $ | 946,482 | $ | 3,632 | |||||||
(1) | Reflects the reclassification of a reserve related to collateral appreciation participation loans to accounts payable and accrued expenses. |
F-12
Table of Contents
The table below summarizes components of unrealized and realized gains and losses in the investment portfolio.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation |
$ | 4,235,738 | $ | 1,136,016 | $ | 2,820,058 | ||||||
Unrealized depreciation |
(7,185,269 | ) | (1,319,686 | ) | (6,638,426 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation on investment in MB and other controlled subsidiaries |
7,454,321 | 5,012,424 | 343,359 | |||||||||
Realized gains |
(2,578,646 | ) | (5,514,345 | ) | (2,676,074 | ) | ||||||
Realized losses |
4,016,566 | 482,510 | 3,343,328 | |||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on foreclosed properties |
920,206 | (1,123,136 | ) | (512,281 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized gain on the sale of Media |
| | 23,512,099 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,862,916 | ($ | 1,326,217 | ) | $ | 20,192,063 | |||||
Net realized gains on investments |
||||||||||||
Realized gains |
$ | 2,578,646 | $ | 5,514,345 | $ | 5,628,629 | ||||||
Realized losses |
(4,016,566 | ) | (918,896 | ) | (3,343,328 | ) | ||||||
Other gains |
5,997,294 | 2,533,099 | | |||||||||
Direct recoveries (charge-offs) |
(1,483,783 | ) | (3,522,429 | ) | 21,526 | |||||||
Realized gains on foreclosed properties |
4,127 | | 22,226 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,079,718 | $ | 3,606,119 | $ | 2,329,053 | ||||||
Goodwill
Effective January 1, 2002, coincident with the adoption of SFAS No.142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, the Company tests its goodwill for impairment, and engages a consultant to help management evaluate its carrying value. The results of this evaluation demonstrated no impairment in goodwill for 2006, 2005, and 2004. The Company conducts annual appraisals of its goodwill, and will recognize any impairment in the period any impairment is identified.
Fixed Assets
Fixed assets are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated economic useful life of the improvement. Depreciation and amortization expense was $415,000, $579,000, and $592,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Deferred Costs
Deferred financing costs, included in other assets, represents costs associated with obtaining the Companys borrowing facilities, and is amortized over the lives of the related financing agreements. Amortization expense was $634,000, $1,192,000, and $1,689,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. In addition, the Company capitalizes certain costs for transactions in the process of completion, including those for acquisitions and the sourcing of other financing alternatives. Upon completion or termination of the transaction, any accumulated amounts will be amortized against income over an appropriate period, capitalized as goodwill, or written off. The amounts on the balance sheet for all of these purposes were $2,247,000 and $1,875,000 as December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Federal Income Taxes
The Company and each of its major subsidiaries other than MB and Media (the RIC subsidiaries) have qualified to be treated for federal income tax purposes as regulated investment companies (RICs) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). As RICs, the Company and each of the RIC subsidiaries are not subject to US federal income tax on any gains or investment company taxable income (which includes, among other things, dividends and interest income reduced by deductible expenses) that it distributes to its shareholders, if at least 90% of its investment company taxable income for that taxable year is distributed. It is the Company's and the RIC subsidiaries policy to comply with the provisions of the Code. The Company qualified and filed its federal tax returns as a RIC for 2005 and 2004, and anticipates qualifying and filing as a RIC for 2006. Income tax (provision) benefit reported on the consolidated statements of operations were $0, $14,000, and ($259,000) for the years ended December 31,
F-13
Table of Contents
2006, 2005, and 2004, and primarily related to the taxes owed by or refunds due from a limited partnership investment of MCI, and in 2004 also related to tax payments made that related to the 2003 taxable year.
MB and Media are not RICs and are taxed as regular corporations. For 2004, Media filed a partial year tax return covering the period prior to the merger with CCU. The Trust and Trust II are not subject to federal income taxation instead their taxable income is treated as having been earned by MFC.
During 2004, BLL changed its tax status from that of a disregarded pass-through entity of the Company to that of a company taxable as a corporation. For 2005 and 2004, BLL had no tax liability as a result of this election.
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations per Share (EPS)
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net increase in net assets resulting from operations available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if option contracts to issue common stock were exercised, and has been computed after giving consideration to the weighted average dilutive effect of the Companys common stock and stock options. The Company uses the treasury stock method to calculate diluted EPS, which is a method of recognizing the use of proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options and warrants in computing diluted EPS. It assumes that any proceeds would be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.
The table below shows the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations available to common shareholders |
$ | 13,108,019 | $ | 6,861,502 | $ | 22,512,029 | |||
Weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS |
17,293,665 | 17,087,034 | 18,001,604 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
467,374 | 465,194 | 422,914 | ||||||
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS |
17,761,039 | 17,552,228 | 18,424,518 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.76 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 1.25 | |||
Diluted earnings per share |
0.74 | 0.39 | 1.22 | ||||||
Potentially dilutive common shares excluded from the above calculations aggregated 611,762, 585,677, and 721,840 shares as of December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Dividends to Shareholders
The table below shows the tax character of distributions for tax reporting purposes.
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Dividends paid from |
|||||||||
Investment income, net |
$ | 6,049,535 | $ | 4,894,078 | $ | 2,582,055 | |||
Realized gain from investment transactions, net |
5,376,614 | 3,633,069 | 3,351,572 | ||||||
Total dividends |
$ | 11,426,149 | $ | 8,527,147 | $ | 5,933,627 | |||
Our ability to make dividend payments is restricted by SBA regulations and under the terms of the SBA debentures. As of December 31, 2006, the Company anticipates paying an estimated $1,368,000 of ordinary income dividends for tax purposes by September 15, 2007.
Stock Compensation
The Company applies SFAS No. 123 (Revised), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans effective January 1, 2006, and accordingly, the Company recognizes the expense of these grants
F-14
Table of Contents
as required. Stock-based employee compensation costs pertaining to stock options is reflected in net increase in net assets resulting from operations, for both any new grants, as well as for all unvested options outstanding at December 31, 2005, in both cases using the fair values established by usage of the Black-Scholes option pricing model, expensed over the vesting period of the underlying option. Previously, the Company applied APB Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for all the plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost was recognized under these plans, and the Company followed the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure.
The Company elected the modified prospective transition method for adopting SFAS No. 123R. Under this method, the provisions of SFAS 123R apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption, as well as for all unvested options outstanding at December 31, 2005. During 2006, the Company issued 207,162 shares of stock-based option awards, and recognized $342,000 or $0.02 per diluted common share of non-cash stock-based compensation expense related to the option grants. During 2005 and 2004, the Company issued 38,000 and 284,204 shares of stock-based option awards, and would have recognized $319,100 or $0.02 per share and $150,717 or $0.01 per share, respectively, of non-cash stock-based compensation expense. As of December 31, 2006, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options was approximately $394,000, which is expected to be recognized over the next sixteen quarters (see note 7).
Had the compensation cost for the Companys stock-based compensation plan been determined under the fairvalue recognition provisions in SFAS No. 123 prior to the date of adopting SFAS No. 123R, the Companys net income and earnings per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts below for the years ended December 31 2005 and 2004.
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 6,861,502 | $ | 22,512,029 | ||||
Add: stock-based employee compensation expense determined under APB No.25, included in net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
| | ||||||
Less: stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method |
(319,100 | ) | (150,717 | ) | ||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations, pro forma |
$ | 6,542,402 | $ | 22,361,312 | ||||
Net value per share |
||||||||
Basic-as reported |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 1.25 | ||||
Basic-pro forma |
0.38 | 1.24 | ||||||
Diluted-as reported |
0.39 | 1.22 | ||||||
Diluted-pro forma |
0.37 | 1.21 |
Derivatives
The Company had no interest rate cap agreements or other derivative investments outstanding during 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform with the current year presentation.
(3) CHANGE IN THE REPORTING ENTITY
Since MB commenced operations in December 2003, the Company had historically consolidated MBs financial statements with those of its own. Although MB is not an investment company, and SEC rules generally do not permit investment companies such as the Company to consolidate the financial statements of non-investment companies, such as MB, the Company had sought and obtained a letter from the SEC in March 2004 permitting such consolidation. We believed that consolidating MB provided a more complete and accurate representation of the Companys full scope of operations, and its complete financial position and results of operations.
F-15
Table of Contents
During August 2006, the Company filed a registration statement on Form N-2 which the SEC staff reviewed and on which they provided comments, including those relating to the consolidation of the accounts of MB. Based on discussion with the SEC staff, the Company determined during the 2006 fourth quarter to voluntarily not consolidate MB and present MB as a portfolio company. We determined that this change represents a change in the reporting entity as described in SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. Accordingly, the Company has retrospectively applied this change to the financial statements of all prior periods presented, including previously issued interim periods presented. The effect of this retrospective application is to present the Companys financial position and results of operations as if MB had not been consolidated for all periods presented and to present MB as an unconsolidated portfolio investment. Although this creates in the reported levels of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations, shareholders equity, and the related amounts per common share are unchanged.
F-16
Table of Contents
The following table presents certain appropriate financial statement captions as previously reported consolidating MB with the Company, and compares them to the current presentation which does not consolidate MB as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Year ended December 31, 2005 (1) | ||||||||||||
As Previously Reported, Consolidated With MB |
As Currently Reported, Not Consolidated With MB |
Change | ||||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 57,173,000 | $ | 34,811,000 | ($ | 22,362,000 | ) | |||||
Interest expense |
24,397,000 | 17,997,000 | (6,400,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net interest income |
32,776,000 | 16,814,000 | (15,962,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income after income taxes |
13,462,000 | 4,582,000 | (8,880,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
(6,600,000 | ) | 2,280,000 | 8,880,000 | ||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 6,862,000 | $ | 6,862,000 | $ | | ||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per diluted common share |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.39 | ||||||||
Total investments |
$ | 723,253,000 | $ | 530,222,000 | ($ | 193,031,000 | ) | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 792,973,000 | $ | 573,354,000 | ($ | 219,619,000 | ) | |||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 626,619,000 | $ | 407,000,000 | ($ | 219,619,000 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders equity |
$ | 166,354,000 | $ | 166,354,000 | $ | | ||||||
Net asset value per share |
$ | 9.69 | $ | 9.69 | $ | | ||||||
Year ended December 31, 2004 (1) | ||||||||||||
As Previously Reported, Consolidated With MB |
As Currently Reported, Not Consolidated With MB |
Change | ||||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 39,119,000 | $ | 24,833,000 | ($ | 14,286,000 | ) | |||||
Interest expense |
16,063,000 | 12,834,000 | (3,229,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net interest income |
23,056,000 | 11,999,000 | (11,057,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income after income (loss) taxes |
5,427,000 | (9,000 | ) | (5,436,000 | ) | |||||||
Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
17,085,000 | 22,521,000 | 5,436,000 | |||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | 22,512,000 | $ | 22,512,000 | $ | | ||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per diluted common share |
$ | 1.22 | $ | 1.22 | $ | | ||||||
(1) | See note 8 for the retrospective application of the change in the reporting entity to the Companys previously issued interim financial information provided. |
F-17
Table of Contents
(4) INVESTMENT IN MEDALLION BANK AND OTHER CONTROLLED SUBSIDIARIES
Medallion Bank
The following table presents MBs statement of operations and other valuation adjustments on other controlled subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands |
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
Statement of operations |
||||||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 29,975,414 | $ | 22,402,976 | $ | 14,326,203 | ||||||
Interest expense |
10,453,732 | 6,413,603 | 3,244,540 | |||||||||
Net interest income |
19,521,682 | 15,989,373 | 11,081,663 | |||||||||
Noninterest income |
490,127 | 408,048 | 135,891 | |||||||||
Operating expenses |
6,289,009 | 5,543,734 | 3,869,221 | |||||||||
Net investment income before income taxes |
13,722,800 | 10,853,687 | 7,348,333 | |||||||||
Income tax provision |
4,387,959 | 1,973,020 | 1,911,837 | |||||||||
Net investment income after income taxes |
9,334,841 | 8,880,667 | 5,436,496 | |||||||||
Net realized/unrealized (losses) of Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries (1) |
(1,880,520 | ) | (3,868,343 | ) | (5,093,137 | ) | ||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations of Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
$ | 7,454,321 | $ | 5,012,424 | $ | 343,359 | ||||||
(1) | Includes $1,450,068, ($230,649), and ($2,826,598) of net realized/unrealized gains (losses) of controlled subsidiaries other than Medallion Bank for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. |
The following table presents MBs balance sheets and the net investment in other controlled subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
2006 | 2005 | |||||
Loans |
$ | 267,839,793 | $ | 216,707,937 | ||
Investment securities, at fair value |
21,682,923 | 18,092,838 | ||||
Net investments ($0 pledged as collateral under borrowing arrangements at December 31, 2006 and 2005) |
289,522,716 | 234,800,775 | ||||
Cash ($0 at December 31, 2006 and $0 December 31, 2005 restricted as to use by lender) |
14,698,919 | 20,227,118 | ||||
Other assets, net |
5,209,015 | 4,180,998 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 309,430,650 | $ | 259,208,891 | ||
Other liabilities |
$ | 832,396 | $ | 446,363 | ||
Payable to parent |
267,247 | 519,002 | ||||
Fixed rate borrowings |
261,483,540 | 219,107,214 | ||||
Total liabilities |
262,583,183 | 220,072,579 | ||||
Medallion Bank equity |
46,847,467 | 39,136,312 | ||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 309,430,650 | $ | 259,208,891 | ||
Investment in other controlled subsidiaries |
$ | 3,373,318 | $ | 680,069 | ||
Total investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
50,488,032 | 40,335,393 | ||||
The following paragraphs summarizes the accounting and reporting policies of MB, and provide additional information relating to the tables presented above.
Investment securities are purchased from time-to-time in the open market at prices that are greater or lesser than the par value of the investment. The resulting premium or discount is deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the yield of the related investment. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the net premium on investment securities totaled $245,000 and $463,000, and amortization expense was $160,000, $177,000, and $81,000 for 2006, 2005, and 2004.
F-18
Table of Contents
MBs policies regarding nonaccrual of medallion and commercial loans are the same as those of the Company. The consumer portfolio has different characteristics compared to commercial loans, typified by a larger number of lower dollar loans that have similar characteristics. As a result, these loans are not typically placed on nonaccrual, but are charged off in their entirety when deemed uncollectible, or when they become 120 days past due, whichever occurs first, at which time appropriate collection and recovery efforts against both the borrower and the underlying collateral are initiated. At December 31, 2006, $504,000 of consumer loans to individuals in bankruptcy, representing less than 1% of consumer loans, were placed on nonaccrual. The amount of interest income on nonaccrual loans that would have been recognized if the loans had been paying in accordance with their original terms was approximately $22,000 in 2006. None of MBs medallion or commercial loans were on nonaccrual as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Medallion Banks loan and investment portfolios are valued similarly to those of the Company, and the consumer portfolio purchase was net of unrealized depreciation of $4,244,000, or 5.0% of the balances outstanding, and included a purchase premium of approximately $5,678,000 of which $986,000, $1,511,000 and $1,288,000 was amortized into interest income during 2006, 2005, and 2004. The premium amounts on the balance sheet were $1,893,000 and $2,879,000 as of December 2006 and 2005. Adjustments to the fair value of this portfolio are based on the historical loan loss data obtained from the seller, adjusted for changes in delinquency trends and other factors as described previously in note 2.
The outstanding balances of fixed rate borrowings were as follows:
Payments Due By Period | December 31, | Interest Rate (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Thereafter | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
$ | 111,869,000 | $ | 76,655,000 | $ | 68,460,000 | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 261,484,000 | $ | 219,107,000 | 4.36 | % | |||||||||
(1) | Weighted average contractual rate as of December 31, 2006. |
In January 2004, MB commenced raising deposits to fund the purchase of various affiliates loan portfolios. The deposits were raised through the use of investment brokerage firms who package deposits qualifying for FDIC insurance into pools that are sold to MB. The rates paid on the deposits are highly competitive with market rates paid by other financial institutions and include a brokerage fee of 0.25% to 0.55%, depending on the maturity of the deposit, which is capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the life of the respective pool. The total amount capitalized at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $999,000 and $747,000, and $699,000 $585,000, and $395,000 was amortized to interest expense during 2006, 2005, and 2004. Interest on the deposits is accrued daily and paid monthly, semiannually, or at maturity.
MB is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FDIC and State of Utah Department of Financial Institutions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on MBs and our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, MB must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of MBs assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. MBs capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the bank regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
FDIC-insured banks, including MB, are subject to certain federal laws, which impose various legal limitations on the extent to which banks may finance or otherwise supply funds to certain of their affiliates. In particular, MB is subject to certain restrictions on any extensions of credit to, or other covered transactions, such as certain purchases of assets, with the Company or its affiliates.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require MB to maintain minimum amounts and ratios as defined in the regulations (set forth in the table below). Additionally, as conditions of granting MBs application for federal deposit insurance, the FDIC ordered that beginning paid-in-capital funds of not less than $22,000,000 be provided, and that the Tier I Leverage Capital to total assets ratio, as defined, of not less than 15%, and an adequate allowance for loan losses shall be maintained and no dividends shall be paid to the Company for its first three years of operation.
F-19
Table of Contents
The following table represents MBs actual capital amounts and related ratios as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, compared to required regulatory minimum capital ratios and the ratio required to be considered well capitalized. As of December 31, 2006, MB meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject, and is well-capitalized.
Regulatory | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||
Minimum | Well-capitalized | |||||||||||||
Tier I capital |
$ | 47,093,000 | $ | 39,379,000 | ||||||||||
Total capital |
50,680,000 | 42,288,000 | ||||||||||||
Average assets |
299,479,000 | 249,314,000 | ||||||||||||
Risk-weighted assets |
284,524,000 | 230,614,000 | ||||||||||||
Leverage ratio (1) |
4 | % | 5 | % | 15.7 | % | 15.8 | % | ||||||
Tier I capital ratio (2) |
4 | 6 | 16.6 | 17.1 | ||||||||||
Total capital ratio (2) |
8 | 10 | 17.8 | 18.3 |
(1) | Calculated by dividing Tier I capital by average assets. |
(2) | Calculated by dividing Tier I or total capital by risk-weighted assets. |
MTM
On September 3, 2004, Media entered into a merger agreement with CCU, whereby 100% of the Companys investment in Media was exchanged on a tax deferred basis for 933,521 shares of CCU stock (NYSE: CCU) and a cash payment of $1,477,000, resulting in an unrealized gain of approximately $23,512,000 and a realized gain of approximately $1,477,000, after costs associated with completing the merger, including costs accrued for potential contractual purchase accounting adjustments in the 2004 third quarter. Additionally, during the 2004 third quarter, the Company sold its investment in MMJ to MMJs management team for $1,600,000, which after considering all sales costs, resulted in a gain on sale of approximately $255,000 in the 2004 third quarter.
The following table presents MTMs combined statements of operations, where applicable, through the respective dates of sale in September 2004. As a result of the sale of MTM during the 2004 third quarter, there was no balance sheet for MTM as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Period Ended September 30, |
||||
2004 (1) | ||||
Advertising revenue |
$ | 4,302,993 | ||
Cost of fleet services |
3,305,579 | |||
Gross profit |
997,414 | |||
Depreciation and other non cash adjustments |
860,431 | |||
Other operating expenses |
3,031,722 | |||
Loss from operations |
(2,894,739 | ) | ||
Other income |
| |||
Loss before taxes |
(2,894,739 | ) | ||
Income tax provision |
2,005 | |||
Net loss |
($2,896,744 | ) | ||
(1) | Represents combined statements of operations through the respective dates of sale in September 2004. |
The Company charged Media $94,000 in 2004 for salaries and benefits and corporate overhead paid by the Company on Medias behalf. During 2004, these amounts owed by Media and MMJ to the Company were contributed to Media and MMJ as equity.
In July 2001, through its subsidiary MMJ, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of a taxi advertising operation similar to those operated by Media in the US, which had advertising rights on approximately 4,800 cabs servicing various cities in Japan. The terms of the agreement provided for an earn-out payment to the sellers based on average net income over the next three years. MMJ accounted for approximately 6% of MTMs combined revenue during 2004.
F-20
Table of Contents
(5) FLOATING RATE BORROWINGS
The outstanding balances of floating rate borrowings were as follows:
Payments Due By Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands |
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Thereafter | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | Interest Rate (1) |
||||||||||||||||||
Revolving lines of credit |
$ | | $ | 282,260 | $ | 66,489 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 348,749 | $ | 304,453 | 5.52 | % | |||||||||
Notes payable to banks |
12,265 | 108 | 2,837 | | | | 15,210 | 8,550 | 7.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Margin loan |
13,927 | | | | | | 13,927 | 10,662 | 6.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 26,192 | $ | 282,368 | $ | 69,326 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 377,886 | $ | 323,665 | 5.62 | ||||||||||
(1) | Weighted average contractual rate as of December 31, 2006. |
(A) REVOLVING LINES OF CREDIT
In December 2006, Trust II entered into a revolving line of credit agreement with Citibank N.A., to provide up to $125,000,000 of financing through a commercial paper conduit to acquire medallion loans from MFC (Citi line), of which $66,489,000 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. Borrowings under Trust IIs revolving line of credit are collateralized by Trust IIs assets. MFC is the servicer of the loans owned by Trust II. The Citi line, of which $66,489,000 was outstanding at December 31, 2006, includes a borrowing base covenant and rapid amortization in certain circumstances. In addition, if certain financial tests are not met, MFC can be replaced as the servicer. The Citi line matures in December 2009. The interest rate is a pooled short-term commercial paper rate, which approximates LIBOR (5.32% at December 31, 2006), plus 0.35% with a facility fee of 0.125% on the aggregate Citi line.
In September 2002, and as renegotiated in September 2003, January 2005, January 2006, and September 2006, the Trust entered into a revolving line of credit agreement (amended) with Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp., as successor to Merrill Lynch Bank, USA (MLB) to provide up to $375,000,000 of financing to acquire medallion loans from MFC (MLB line), of which $282,260,000 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. Borrowings under the Trusts revolving line of credit are collateralized by the Trusts assets. MFC is the servicer of the loans owned by the Trust. The MLB line includes a borrowing base covenant and rapid amortization in certain circumstances. In addition, if certain financial tests are not met, MFC can be replaced as the servicer. The MLB line matures in September 2008. Effective January 2005, the interest rate was generally LIBOR (5.32% at December 31, 2006) plus 0.75% with an unused facility fee of 0.375% on unused amounts up to $250,000,000, and effective September 2003, was LIBOR plus 1.25% and 0.125%. The facility fees were $500,000 in September 2006, $200,000 in February 2006, $200,000 in January 2006, $300,000 in September 2005, $900,000 in September 2004, and $375,000 in September 2003; and $219,000 remains to be paid prorata over the next seven quarters.
(B) NOTES PAYABLE TO BANKS AND MARGIN LOAN
In December 2006, the Company entered into an additional margin loan agreement with Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. The margin loan is secured by the pledge of short-term, high-quality investment securities held by the Company, and is generally available at 99% of the current fair market value of the securities, or $9,974,000 as of December 31, 2006. The margin loan bears interest at LIBOR (5.32% at December 31, 2006) plus 0.50%. As of December 31, 2006, $9,978,000 had been drawn down under this margin loan.
In December 2006, certain operating subsidiaries of MFC entered into an aggregate $966,000 of note agreements with New York Commercial Bank, collateralized by certain taxicab medallions owned by Medallion Chicago of which $966,000 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. The note agreements bear interest at 6.50%, payable monthly. The notes mature December 9, 2009, and are guaranteed by the Company. Principal and interest payments of $8,000 are due monthly, with the balance due at maturity.
In October 2006, certain operating subsidiaries of MFC entered into an aggregate $840,000 of note agreements with Metropolitan Bank of New York, collateralized by certain taxicab medallions owned by Medallion Chicago of which $834,000 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. The note agreements bear interest at 6.75%, payable monthly. The notes mature October 30, 2009, and are guaranteed by the Company. Principal and interest payments of $7,000 are due monthly, with the balance due at maturity.
F-21
Table of Contents
On January 25, 2005, MFC entered into a $4,000,000 revolving note agreement with Atlantic Bank of New York that matured on December 1, 2005, and which maturity was extended by Atlantic Bank to February 1, 2006, and which was further extended to August 1, 2007. On March 6, 2006, the line of credit was increased to $6,000,000. The line is secured by medallion loans of MFC that are in process of being sold to the Trust, any draws being payable from the receipt of proceeds from the sale. The line bears interest at the prime rate (8.25% at December 31, 2006) minus 0.25%, payable monthly. As of December 31, 2006, $3,075,000 had been drawn down under this line.
In November 2004, the Company entered into a margin loan agreement with Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. The margin loan is secured by the pledged stock of CCU held by the Company, and is generally available at 60% of the current fair market value of the CCU stock, or $13,630,000 as of December 31, 2006. The margin loan bears interest at the federal funds rate (5.25% at December 31, 2006) plus 0.75%. As of December 31, 2006, $3,953,000 had been drawn down under this margin loan.
On April 26, 2004, the Company entered into a $15,000,000 revolving note agreement with Sterling National Bank that matured on April 25, 2005, and which maturity was extended by Sterling National Bank for 60 days. On June 28, 2005, the maturity date was further extended to July 31, 2005. On July 28, 2005, the note agreement was amended, and the maturity date was extended until June 30, 2006. On June 15, 2006, the maturity date was extended to August 31, 2006, and on August 14, 2006, the line was further extended to June 30, 2007 and was increased to $20,000,000. The line is secured by certain pledged assets of the Company and MBC, and is subject to periodic borrowing base requirements. Effective August 2006, the line bears interest, payable monthly, at LIBOR (5.32% at December 31, 2006) plus 2.0% with no unused fee, and prior to that was at the prime rate, and was subject to an unused fee of 0.125%. As of December 31, 2006, $7,500,000 had been drawn down under this line.
On July 11, 2003, certain operating subsidiaries of MFC entered into an aggregate $1,700,000 of note agreements with Atlantic Bank of New York and Israel Discount Bank, collateralized by certain taxicab medallions owned by Medallion Chicago of which $1,254,000 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. Effective July 2006, the note agreements bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%, or 7.04%, and prior to that at LIBOR plus 2%, adjusted annually, payable monthly. The notes matured July 8, 2006, and in July 2006 the maturity dates of the notes were extended until August 1, 2009. Principal and interest payments of $15,000 are due monthly, with the balance due at maturity.
On June 30, 2003, an operating subsidiary of MFC entered into a $2,000,000 note agreement with Banco Popular North America, collateralized by certain taxicab medallions owned by Medallion Chicago, of which $1,581,000 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. The note matures June 1, 2007 and bears interest at Banco Populars prime rate (8.25% at December 31, 2006) less 0.25%, adjusted annually, payable monthly. Principal and interest payments of $18,000 are due monthly, with the balance due at maturity.
(C) COVENANT COMPLIANCE
In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries enter into agreements, or are subject to regulatory requirements, that result in loan restrictions. In the debt, the restrictions require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios, including debt to equity and minimum net worth. In addition, the Companys wholly owned subsidiary MB is restricted by regulatory requirements to declare dividends.
(6) FIXED RATE BORROWINGS
The outstanding balances of fixed rate borrowings were as follows:
Payments Due By Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands |
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Thereafter | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | Interest Rate (1) |
||||||||||||||||||
SBA debentures |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 17,985 | $ | 59,265 | $ | 77,250 | $ | 77,250 | 6.05 | % | |||||||||
(1) | Weighted average contractual rate as of December 31, 2006. |
In September 2006, the SBA approved a $6,000,000 commitment for FSVC to issue additional debentures to the SBA during a four year period upon payment of a 1% fee and the infusion of $2,000,000 of additional capital. In March 2006, the SBA approved a $13,500,000 commitment for MCI to issue additional debentures to the SBA during a four year period upon payment of a 1% fee and the infusion of $6,750,000 of additional capital. In November 2003, the SBA approved an $8,000,000 commitment for FSVC, and during 2001, the SBA approved $36,000,000 each in commitments for FSVC and MCI. As of December 31, 2006, $80,000,000 of commitments had been fully utilized, and $19,500,000 was available for borrowing.
The notes are collateralized by substantially all the Companys assets and are subject to the terms and conditions of agreements with the SBA which, among other things, restrict stock redemptions, disposition of assets, new indebtedness, dividends or distributions, and changes in management, ownership, investment policy, or operations.
(7) STOCK OPTIONS
The Company has a stock option plan (2006 Stock Option Plan) available to grant both incentive and nonqualified stock options to employees. The 2006 Stock Option Plan, which was approved by the Board of Directors on February 15, 2006 and shareholders on
F-22
Table of Contents
June 16, 2006, provides for the issuance of a maximum of 800,000 shares of common stock of the Company. At December 31, 2006, 800,000 shares of the Companys common stock remained available for future grants, and no shares had been granted under the plan. The 2006 Stock Option Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The option price per share may not be less than the current market value of the Company's common stock on the date the option is granted. The term and vesting periods of the options are determined by the Compensation Committee, provided that the maximum term of an option may not exceed a period of ten years.
The Companys Board of Directors approved a new non-employee director stock option plan (the 2006 Director Plan) on February 15, 2006, which was approved by shareholders on June 16, 2006. The Company will implement the plan following receipt of exemptive relief from the SEC. The 2006 Director Plan would provide for an automatic grant of options to purchase 9,000 shares of the Companys common stock to an Eligible Director upon election to the Board, with an adjustment for directors who are elected to serve less than a full term. A total of 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock would be issuable under the 2006 Director Plan. The option price per share could not be less than the current market value of the Company's common stock on the date the option is granted. Options granted under the 2006 Director Plan would be exercisable annually, as defined in the 2006 Director Plan. The term of the options could not exceed ten years.
The Companys 1996 Stock Option Plan and 1996 Director Plan terminated on May 21, 2006 and no additional shares are available for future issuance. At December 31, 2006, 1,456,530 shares of the Companys common stock had been granted under the plans, of which 1,233,512 shares were exercisable.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $2.02, $1.97, and $1.74 per share for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. The following assumptions were used for the 207,162 shares granted during 2006, and for the 38,000 and 284,204 shares granted during 2005 and 2004. The fair value of the options vested was $1,665,000, $3,709,000 and $3,008,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Risk free interest rate |
4.75 | % | 4.32 | % | 4.13 | % | |||
Expected dividend yield |
8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | ||||||
Expected life of option in years |
7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | ||||||
Expected volatility(1) |
35.00 | 44.00 | 44.00 |
(1) | In prior period, we determined our expected volatility using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on our historical volatility during the expected term of the option. Beginning in 2006, we determined our expected volatility based on a combination of our historical volatility during the expected term of the options and our implied volatility based on the market prices of traded options of our stock. |
The following table presents the activity for the stock option program under the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the Director Plan for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Number of Options | Exercise Price Per Share |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
1,903,579 | $ | 3.50-29.25 | $ | 10.91 | ||||
Granted |
284,204 | 7.68-9.07 | 8.56 | ||||||
Cancelled |
(249,236 | ) | 4.00-29.25 | 18.39 | |||||
Exercised(1) |
(55,338 | ) | 4.00-6.98 | 4.79 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
1,883,209 | $ | 3.50-29.25 | $ | 9.75 | ||||
Granted |
38,000 | 9.27-9.60 | 9.44 | ||||||
Cancelled |
(48,607 | ) | 4.85-18.75 | 13.61 | |||||
Exercised(1) |
(218,198 | ) | 3.87-8.72 | 5.30 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
1,654,404 | $ | 3.50-29.25 | $ | 10.21 | ||||
Granted |
207,162 | 13.06-13.06 | 13.06 | ||||||
Cancelled |
(151,918 | ) | 4.85-29.25 | 17.03 | |||||
Exercised(1) |
(253,118 | ) | 3.70-8.40 | 4.94 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006(2) |
1,456,530 | $ | 3.50-29.25 | $ | 10.82 | ||||
Options exercisable at |
|||||||||
December 31, 2004 |
1,137,687 | $ | 3.50-29.25 | 10.54 | |||||
December 31, 2005 |
1,505,067 | 3.50-29.25 | 10.10 | ||||||
December 31, 2006(2) |
1,233,512 | 3.50-29.25 | 10.79 | ||||||
(1) | The aggregate intrinsic value, which represents the difference between the price of the Companys common stock at the exercise date and the related exercise price of the underlying options, was $1,186,000, $1,011,000, and $210,000 for options exercised during 2006, 2005, and 2004. |
(2) | The aggregate intrinsic value, which represents the difference between the price of the Companys common stock at December 31, 2006 and the related exercise price of the underlying options, was $2,253,000 for outstanding options and $2,002,000 for exercisable options as of December 31, 2006. |
F-23
Table of Contents
The following table presents the activity for the unvested options outstanding under the plan for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Number of Options | Range of Exercise Prices Per Share |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
149,337 | $ | 3.50-13.75 | $ | 8.60 | ||||
Granted |
207,162 | 13.06-13.06 | 13.06 | ||||||
Cancelled |
(2,500 | ) | 8.40-8.40 | 8.40 | |||||
Vested |
(130,981 | ) | 3.50-13.75 | 8.45 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
223,018 | $ | 3.50-13.75 | $ | 8.66 | ||||
The following table summarizes information regarding options outstanding and options exercisable at December 31, 2006 under the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the 1996 Director Plan.
Options Outstanding Weighted average |
Options Exercisable Weighted average | |||||||||||||
Range
of |
Shares at December 31, 2006 |
Remaining contractual life in years |
Exercise price |
Shares at December 31, 2006 |
Remaining contractual life in years |
Exercise price | ||||||||
$3.50-5.51 | 455,350 | 5.47 | $ | 4.86 | 455,350 | 5.47 | $ | 4.86 | ||||||
6.50-13.75 | 618,398 | 6.91 | 10.36 | 395,380 | 6.18 | 9.99 | ||||||||
14.25-15.56 | 42,848 | 3.20 | 14.71 | 42,848 | 3.20 | 14.71 | ||||||||
17.25-18.75 | 289,934 | 2.43 | 17.41 | 289,934 | 2.43 | 17.41 | ||||||||
29.25-29.25 | 50,000 | 1.34 | 29.25 | 50,000 | 1.34 | 29.25 | ||||||||
$3.50-29.25 | 1,456,530 | 5.26 | 10.82 | 1,233,512 | 4.74 | 10.79 | ||||||||
F-24
Table of Contents
(8) QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents the Companys quarterly results of operations reflecting the retrospective application of the change in the reporting entity described in note 3 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | ||||||||||
(As adjusted) | (As adjusted) | (As adjusted) | (As adjusted) | |||||||||||
2006 Quarter Ended |
||||||||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 10,014 | $ | 9,338 | $ | 9,630 | $ | 10,653 | ||||||
Net investment income after income taxes |
1,727 | 329 | 144 | 965 | ||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
1,787 | 4,076 | 1,401 | 5,844 | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share |
||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.34 | ||||||
Diluted |
0.10 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.33 | ||||||||||
2005 Quarter Ended |
||||||||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 8,195 | $ | 8,763 | $ | 8,863 | $ | 8,990 | ||||||
Net investment income after income taxes |
1,020 | 1,854 | 668 | 1,040 | ||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
2,236 | 447 | 3,575 | 603 | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share |
||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
Diluted |
0.13 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.03 | ||||||||||
2004 Quarter Ended |
||||||||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 5,604 | $ | 5,882 | $ | 6,582 | $ | 6,750 | ||||||
Net investment income(loss) after income taxes |
(37 | ) | (470 | ) | 150 | 348 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
(1,380 | ) | 249 | 20,055 | 3,588 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share |
||||||||||||||
Basic |
($0.08 | ) | 0.01 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 0.21 | |||||||
Diluted |
(0.08 | ) | 0.01 | 1.09 | 0.20 | |||||||||
(9) RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which includes an amendment to SFAS No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS 158). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position the funded status of a benefit plan; (b) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the end of the employers fiscal year (with limited exceptions); and (c) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs pursuant to prior existing guidance, any adjustments to amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. The provisions governing recognition of the funded status of a defined benefit plan and related disclosures are effective as of the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006 and not before June 16, 2007. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No.157, Fair Value Measurement. This statement defines fair values, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We currently follow fair market value accounting in its consolidated financial statements as a RIC; hence we do not expect the adoption of SFAS No.157 to have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
F-25
Table of Contents
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting For Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The interpretation sets a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for recognizing tax positions in a companys financial statements based on a determination whether it is likely or not that the tax position would withstand a tax audit, without regard for the likelihood of a tax audit taking place. Assuming a position meets the "more-likely-than-not" threshold, the interpretation also prescribes a measurement attribute requiring determination of how much of the tax position would ultimately be allowed if challenged. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of SFAS Nos. 133 and 140. This statement permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are free standing derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that require bifurcation, clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives, and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, as defined. We do not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
(10) SEGMENT REPORTING
For 2004, the Company had two reportable business segments, lending and taxicab rooftop advertising. The lending segment originates and services medallion and secured commercial loans, and invests in both marketable and nonmarketable securities. The taxicab rooftop advertising segment sold advertising space to advertising agencies and companies in several major markets across the US and Japan, and was conducted by Media. Media was reported as a portfolio investment of the Company and was accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The lending segment is presented in the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Financial information relating to the taxicab rooftop advertising segment is presented in Note 4.
For taxicab rooftop advertising, the increase in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the Companys investment in Media represents Medias net income or loss, which the Company uses as the basis for assessing the fair market value of Media. Taxicab rooftop advertising segment assets were reflected in investment in and loans to Media on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 4.
As described in Note 4, in 2004 the Company exchanged its investment in Media, a portfolio company, for shares of CCU and other consideration.
(11) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Employment Agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain key officers for either a three or five-year term. Annually, the contracts with a five-year term will renew for new five-year terms unless prior to the end of the first year, either the Company or the executive provides notice to the other party of its intention not to extend the employment period beyond the current five-year term. In the event of a change in control, as defined, during the employment period, the agreements provide for severance compensation to the executive in an amount equal to the balance of the salary, bonus, and value of fringe benefits which the executive would be entitled to receive for the remainder of the employment period.
Employment agreements expire at various through 2009. At December 31, 2006, minimum payments under employment agreements are as follows:
2007 |
$ | 2,338,000 | |
2008 |
2,194,000 | ||
2009 |
934,000 | ||
2010 |
630,000 | ||
2011 |
263,000 | ||
2012 and thereafter |
| ||
Total |
$ | 6,359,000 | |
(b) Other Commitments
The Company had loan commitments outstanding of $460,000 at December 31, 2006 that are generally on the same terms as those to existing borrowers. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates. Since some commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. In addition, the Company had approximately $31,942,000 of undisbursed funds relating to revolving credit facilities with borrowers. These amounts may be drawn upon at the customer's request if they meet certain credit requirements.
F-26
Table of Contents
Commitments for leased premises expire at various dates through June 30, 2016. At December 31, 2006, minimum rental commitments for non-cancelable leases are as follows:
2007 |
$ | 1,176,000 | |
2008 |
1,118,000 | ||
2009 |
1,081,000 | ||
2010 |
1,025,000 | ||
2011 |
1,025,000 | ||
2012 and thereafter |
4,139,000 | ||
Total |
$ | 9,564,000 | |
Rent expense was $1,266,000, $1,338,000, and $1,244,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
(c) Litigation
The Company and its subsidiaries become defendants to various legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based on the advice of legal counsel, there is no proceeding pending, or to the knowledge of management threatened, which in the event of an adverse decision would result in a material adverse impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
(12) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain directors, officers, and shareholders of the Company are also directors of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, MFC, BLL, MCI, MBC, FSVC, and MB. Officer salaries are set by the Board of Directors of the Company.
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, a member of the Board of Directors of the Company was also a partner in the Companys primary law firm. Amounts paid to the law firm were approximately $542,000, $198,000, and $251,000 in 2006, 2005, and 2004.
During 2006, 2005 and 2004 we serviced $155,099,000, $129,391,000 and $114,387,000 in loans for MB. Included in net investment income were amounts as described below that were received from MB for services rendered in originating and servicing loans, and also for reimbursement of certain expenses incurred on their behalf.:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Servicing fees |
$ | 1,326,693 | $ | 1,292,002 | $ | 1,015,399 | |||
Loan origination fees |
380,792 | 276,142 | 61,821 | ||||||
Reimbursement of operating expenses |
167,115 | 169,809 | 301,843 | ||||||
Interest income |
16,175 | 14,591 | 14,219 | ||||||
Total other income |
$ | 1,890,775 | $ | 1,752,544 | $ | 1,393,282 | |||
(13) SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
In November 2003, the Company announced a stock repurchase program which authorized the repurchase of up to $10,000,000 of common stock during the following six months, with an option for the Board of Directors to extend the time frame for completing the purchases. In November 2004, the repurchase program was increased by an additional $10,000,000. As of December 31, 2006, 1,353,233 shares were repurchased for $12,279,000.
F-27
Table of Contents
(14) OTHER INCOME AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
The major components of other income were as follows:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Servicing fees |
$ | 1,326,693 | $ | 1,878,819 | $ | 2,010,704 | |||
Prepayment penalties |
724,379 | 873,645 | 287,377 | ||||||
Late charges |
228,559 | 332,200 | 485,402 | ||||||
Accretion of discount |
| 350,344 | 284,093 | ||||||
Other |
366,943 | 418,086 | 362,480 | ||||||
Total other income |
$ | 2,646,574 | $ | 3,853,094 | $ | 3,430,056 | |||
Included in prepayment penalties in 2006 and 2005 was $629,000 and $810,000 related to the early payoff of several large loans. The decrease in servicing fees, late charges, accretion of discount and other income over the last year primarily reflects the sale of BLL loan portfolio in October 2005
The major components of other operating expenses were as follows:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Directors fees |
$ | 492,080 | $ | 426,363 | $ | 355,029 | |||
Travel, meals, and entertainment |
490,785 | 651,693 | 522,158 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
415,413 | 579,383 | 591,830 | ||||||
Loan collection expense |
371,591 | 236,646 | 447,229 | ||||||
Insurance |
302,192 | 395,969 | 494,557 | ||||||
Office expense |
294,215 | 329,148 | 266,715 | ||||||
Miscellaneous taxes |
274,216 | 220,632 | 384,598 | ||||||
Telephone |
194,419 | 258,174 | 202,488 | ||||||
Printing and stationary |
131,284 | 121,225 | 131,651 | ||||||
Dues and subscriptions |
128,581 | 109,839 | 96,417 | ||||||
Computer expense |
104,427 | 189,936 | 227,854 | ||||||
Bank charges |
66,598 | 84,117 | 147,447 | ||||||
Advertising, marketing, and public relations |
30,359 | 136,745 | 77,320 | ||||||
Other expenses |
215,456 | 405,703 | 1,045,539 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 3,511,616 | $ | 4,145,573 | $ | 4,990,832 | |||
Operating expenses decreased as a whole primarily due to the sale of BLL in October 2005. Travel and entertainment decreased as a result of less expensive business development activities compared to that of 2005. Depreciation and amortization decreased in 2006 and 2005 due to an increase in the amount of fully depreciated assets on our books. Loan collections expense increased in 2006 due to the formation of certain of the Medallion Chicago entities and the transfers of title to the owned medallions, and decreased in 2005 as the number of loans over 90 days past due had declined due to better collection efforts. Directors fees increased primarily due to increases in the amounts paid to directors and in the number of board meetings held. Insurance expense decreased as a result of lower premiums charged in a more competitive insurance market. Miscellaneous taxes increased in 2006 due to the payment of taxes for a limited partnership investment, and decreased in 2005 due to sales tax audits in 2004 dating back to 1995. Telephone expense decreased due to the conversion of our phone system from analog to digital in 2005. Bank charges continued to decrease, reflecting improved utilization of banking relationships. Other expenses decreased in 2005 since we were accruing for our new loan system in 2004 and decreased in 2006 primarily due to the sale of BLL in October 2005.
F-28
Table of Contents
(15) SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS AND OTHER DATA
The following table provides selected financial ratios and other data:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Net share data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value at the beginning of the period |
$ | 9.69 | $ | 9.83 | $ | 8.89 | $ | 8.87 | $ | 9.59 | ||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
0.18 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.13 | (0.44 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit |
0.00 | 0.00 | (0.01 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net realized gains (losses) on investments |
0.17 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.63 | (0.35 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
0.39 | (0.08 | ) | 1.09 | (0.65 | ) | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
0.74 | 0.39 | 1.22 | 0.11 | (0.69 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
(0.04 | ) | (0.06 | ) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
| 0.03 | 0.05 | | | |||||||||||||||
Distribution of net investment income |
(0.44 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.09 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||
Distribution of net realized gains on investments |
(0.22 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.19 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Total increase (decrease) in net asset value |
0.04 | (0.14 | ) | 0.94 | 0.02 | (0.72 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net asset value at the end of the period (1) |
$ | 9.73 | $ | 9.69 | $ | 9.83 | $ | 8.89 | $ | 8.87 | ||||||||||
Per share market value at beginning of period |
$ | 11.26 | $ | 9.70 | $ | 9.49 | $ | 3.90 | $ | 7.90 | ||||||||||
Per share market value at end of period |
12.37 | 11.26 | 9.70 | 9.49 | 3.90 | |||||||||||||||
Total return (2) |
16 | % | 21 | % | 6 | % | 146 | % | (50 | %) | ||||||||||
Ratios/supplemental data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Average net assets |
$ | 167,528,000 | $ | 167,909,130 | $ | 162,843,480 | $ | 162,265,000 | $ | 168,627,645 | ||||||||||
Total expense ratio (3) |
23 | % | 21 | % | 18 | % | 17 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||||
Operating expenses to average net assets (4) |
8.91 | 10.11 | 9.88 | 9.97 | 10.92 | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) after taxes to average net assets (5) |
1.89 | 2.73 | (0.01 | ) | 1.44 | (0.90 | ) | |||||||||||||
(1) | Includes $ 0.08, $0.12, $0.07, $0.00, and $0.00 of undistributed net investment income per share as of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002. |
(2) | Total return is calculated by dividing the change in market value of a share of common stock during the year, assuming the reinvestment of dividends on the payment date, by the per share market value at the beginning of the year. |
(3) | Total expense ratio represents total expenses (interest expense, operating expenses, and income taxes) divided by average net assets. |
(4) | Operating expense ratios presented exclude the $63,000 and $9,417,000 costs of debt extinguishment in 2003 and 2002. Unadjusted, the ratios would have been 10.01% and 16.50% in 2003 and 2002. |
(5) | Net investment income ratios presented exclude the $63,000 and $9,417,000 costs of debt extinguishment in 2003 and 2002. Unadjusted, the ratios would have been 0.87% and (4.68%) in 2003 and 2002. |
(16) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has a 401(k) Investment Plan (the 401(k) Plan) which covers all full-time and part-time employees of the Company who have attained the age of 21 and have a minimum of one year of service, including the employees of MB. Under the 401(k) Plan, an employee may elect to defer not less than 1% and no more than 15% of the total annual compensation that would otherwise be paid to the employee, provided, however, that employees contributions may not exceed certain maximum amounts determined under the Code. Employee contributions are invested in various mutual funds according to the directions of the employee. Beginning September 1, 1998, the Company elected to match employee contributions to the 401(k) Plan in an amount per employee up to one-third of such employees contribution but in no event greater than 2% of the portion of such employees annual salary eligible for 401(k) Plan benefits. The Companys 401(k) plan expense, which including amounts for the employees of MB, was approximately $59,000, $67,000, and $68,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
(17) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS 107) requires disclosure of fair value information about certain financial instruments, whether assets, liabilities, or off-balance-sheet commitments, if practicable. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument. Fair value estimates that were derived from broker quotes cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument.
(a) Investments-The Companys investments are recorded at the estimated fair value of such investments.
F-29
Table of Contents
(b) Floating rate borrowings-Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, the carrying amount approximates fair value.
(c) Commitments to extend credit-The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and present creditworthiness of the counter parties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also includes a consideration of the difference between the current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the estimated fair value of these off-balance-sheet instruments was not material.
(d) Fixed rate borrowings-The fair value of the debentures payable to the SBA is estimated based on current market interest rates for similar debt.
December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||
Financial Assets |
||||||||||||
Investments |
$ | 592,933,000 | $ | 592,933,000 | $ | 530,227,000 | $ | 530,227,000 | ||||
Cash |
15,399,000 | 15,399,000 | 22,808,000 | 22,808,000 | ||||||||
Financial Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Floating rate debt |
377,886,000 | 377,886,000 | 323,665,000 | 323,665,000 | ||||||||
Fixed rate debt |
77,250,000 | 77,250,000 | 77,250,000 | 77,250,000 |
(18) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 16, 2007, the Companys board of directors declared a $0.19 per share common stock dividend, payable on April 13, 2007 to shareholders of record on March 30, 2007.
F-30
Table of Contents
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2006
Industry | State | Security Type | % Held | # of Invest. |
% of Total | Interest Rate (1) |
Investment Balances |
|||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
New York |
1,187 | 57 | % | 6.74 | % | $ | 340,109,733 | |||||||||||||
Boston |
195 | 6 | 8.12 | 32,786,709 | ||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
335 | 5 | 6.88 | 31,076,720 | ||||||||||||||||
Newark |
102 | 2 | 8.32 | 10,233,616 | ||||||||||||||||
Cambridge |
38 | 1 | 7.93 | 8,183,726 | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
37 | 1 | 7.55 | 5,585,825 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,894 | 72 | % | 6.93 | 427,976,329 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
728,847 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(456,587 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Medallion loans, net |
$ | 428,248,589 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
Secured mezzanine (24% Minnesota, 13% Wisconsin, 12% Texas, 8% Indiana, 8% Iowa, and 35% all other states) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
18 | 5 | % | 13.19 | % | $ | 28,699,307 | |||||||||||||
Accommodation and food services |
4 | 1 | 11.50 | 7,505,078 | ||||||||||||||||
Administrative and support services |
3 | 1 | 16.96 | 5,939,052 | ||||||||||||||||
Transportation and warehousing |
1 | * | 14.00 | 2,700,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Professional, scientific, and technical services |
2 | * | 18.81 | 2,619,125 | ||||||||||||||||
Information |
2 | * | 17.50 | 2,407,004 | ||||||||||||||||
Health care and social assistance |
2 | * | 12.00 | 2,251,575 | ||||||||||||||||
Retail trade |
1 | * | 10.88 | 1,120,340 | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale trade |
1 | * | 13.75 | 293,102 | ||||||||||||||||
Other services (except public administration) |
1 | * | 12.50 | 196,832 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
35 | 9 | % | 13.78 | $ | 53,731,415 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-based (75% New York, 16% New Jersey, and 9% all other states) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale trade |
8 | 1 | % | 9.66 | % | $ | 7,186,172 | |||||||||||||
Transportation and warehousing |
4 | * | 10.52 | 3,302,222 | ||||||||||||||||
Retail trade |
7 | * | 10.24 | 2,698,101 | ||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
8 | * | 11.44 | 2,145,350 | ||||||||||||||||
Administrative and support services |
2 | * | 10.76 | 1,070,546 | ||||||||||||||||
Construction |
2 | * | 10.25 | 1,029,896 | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate and rental and leasing |
2 | * | 10.49 | 558,598 | ||||||||||||||||
Finance and insurance |
5 | * | 11.77 | 351,812 | ||||||||||||||||
Arts, entertainment, and recreation |
1 | * | 11.48 | 192,372 | ||||||||||||||||
Professional, scientific, and technical services |
1 | * | 10.25 | 132,870 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
40 | 3 | % | 10.28 | $ | 18,667,939 | ||||||||||||||
Other secured commercial (75% New York, 10% New Jersey, 8% Arizona, and 7% all other states) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail trade |
19 | * | 11.79 | % | $ | 3,958,960 | ||||||||||||||
Transportation and warehousing |
55 | * | 7.09 | 3,722,969 | ||||||||||||||||
Other services (except public administration) |
26 | * | 9.66 | 3,711,591 | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate and rental and leasing |
10 | * | 8.53 | 3,047,272 | ||||||||||||||||
Accommodation and food services |
21 | * | 10.46 | 2,795,216 | ||||||||||||||||
Information |
1 | * | 11.70 | 828,044 | ||||||||||||||||
Construction |
1 | * | 8.25 | 305,368 | ||||||||||||||||
Arts, entertainment, and recreation |
1 | * | 9.00 | 96,413 | ||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
2 | * | 8.95 | 24,151 | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale trade |
1 | * | 8.50 | 14,359 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
137 | 3 | % | 9.59 | $ | 18,504,343 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
212 | 15 | % | 12.21 | % | $ | 90,903,697 | |||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
(97,927 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(2,599,109 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans, net |
$ | 88,206,661 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents the weighted average interest rate of the respective portfolio as of the date indicated. |
F-31
Table of Contents
Medallion Financial Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31,2006
Industry | State | Security Type | % Held |
# of Invest. |
% of Total |
Interest Rate (1) |
Investment Balances |
||||||||||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Medallion Bank** |
Commercial banking |
Utah | Common stock |
100 | % | 1 | 8 | % | 0.00 | % | $ | 46,957,812 | |||||||||
Salt Lake City, Utah |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Medallion Hamptons Holding, LLC |
Real Estate | NY | Membership Interests |
100 | % | 1 | * | 0.00 | 1,466,188 | ||||||||||||
437 Madison Avenue |
|||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY 10022 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Generation Outdoors, LLC |
Advertising | NY | Common stock |
100 | % | 1 | * | 0.00 | 774,032 | ||||||||||||
437 Madison Avenue |
|||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY 10022 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
3 | 8 | % | 0.00 | % | 49,198,032 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on investments in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
|
1,250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries, net |
|
$ | 50,448,032 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.** |
Broadcasting - Radio |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | 2 | % | 2.12 | % | $ | 12,334,876 | |||||||||||
200 East Basse Road |
|||||||||||||||||||||
San Antonio, TX 78209 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
PMC Commercial Trust ** |
Real Estate Investment Trust |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | * | 10.7 | 900,897 | ||||||||||||||
17950 Preston Road, Suite 600 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas, TX 75252 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Restaurant Technologies |
Restaurant Service Provider |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | * | 0.00 | 620,796 | ||||||||||||||
940 Apollo Road, Suite 110 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Eagan, MN 55121 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Micromedics, Inc. |
Medical Device Manufacturer |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | * | 0.00 | 58,828 | ||||||||||||||
1270 Eagan Industrial Road |
|||||||||||||||||||||
St. Paul, MN 55121-1385 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Star Concessions, Ltd. |
Airport Food and Retail |
Limited Partnership Interest |
45 | % | 1 | * | 0.00 | 40,000 | |||||||||||||
8008 Cedar Springs Road, Terminal Building LB |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas, TX 75235 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc.** |
Appliance Recycler |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | * | 0.00 | | ||||||||||||||
7400 Excelsior Boulevard |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Minneapolis, MN 55426-4516 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 2 | % | 0.91 | % | 13,955,397 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on equities |
2,112,846 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity investments, net |
$ | 16,068,243 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal National Mortgage Association** |
Finance | Bonds | * | 1 | 2 | % | 4.59 | % | $ | 9,961,111 | |||||||||||
3900 Wisconsin Avenue NW |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Washington, DC 20016 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1 | 2 | % | 4.59 | % | 9,961,111 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on investment securities |
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities, net |
$ | 9,961,111 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total investments at cost |
2,114 | 100 | % | 6.90 | % | $ | 591,994,566 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
630,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on investments in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
|
1,250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on equities |
2,112,846 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(3,055,696 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Investments ($405,817,000 pledged as collateral under borrowing arrangements) |
|
$ | 592,932,636 | ||||||||||||||||||
* | Less than 1.0% |
** | Not an eligible portfolio company as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(46) of the 1940 Act. |
(1) | Represents the weighted average interest rate of the respective portfolio as of the date indicated. |
F-32
Table of Contents
Medallion Financial Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments (as adjusted)
December 31, 2005
Industry | State | Security Type | % Held | # of Invest. |
% of Total | Interest Rate (1) |
Investment Balances |
|||||||||||||
Medallion loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
New York |
1,128 | 53 | % | 6.27 | % | $ | 285,926,609 | |||||||||||||
Chicago |
324 | 9 | 6.95 | 48,045,384 | ||||||||||||||||
Boston |
153 | 5 | 7.50 | 25,556,403 | ||||||||||||||||
Newark |
44 | 1 | 8.40 | 4,398,945 | ||||||||||||||||
Cambridge |
28 | 1 | 7.24 | 5,408,535 | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
36 | 1 | 7.46 | 5,976,678 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,713 | 70 | % | 6.50 | 375,312,554 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
1,047,983 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(1,097,134 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Medallion loans, net |
$ | 375,263,403 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
Secured mezzanine (38% Minnesota, 13% Texas, 9% California, 7% Iowa, and 33% all other states) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
17 | 4 | % | 13.75 | % | $ | 21,525,702 | |||||||||||||
Accommodation and food services |
4 | 2 | 11.18 | 9,779,324 | ||||||||||||||||
Administrative and support services |
3 | 1 | 14.32 | 5,375,270 | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale trade |
1 | 1 | 18.50 | 4,400,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Information |
4 | 1 | 17.78 | 3,316,450 | ||||||||||||||||
Transportation and warehousing |
1 | 1 | 14.00 | 2,700,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Professional, scientific, and technical services |
2 | * | 18.80 | 2,449,294 | ||||||||||||||||
Health care and social assistance |
2 | * | 12.00 | 2,437,247 | ||||||||||||||||
Retail trade |
1 | * | 10.00 | 1,224,105 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
35 | 10 | % | 14.06 | $ | 53,207,392 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-based (84% New York, 11% New Jersey and 5% all other states) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail Trade |
9 | 1 | % | 9.08 | % | $ | 6,758,565 | |||||||||||||
Wholesale Trade |
9 | * | 9.13 | 5,202,940 | ||||||||||||||||
Transportation and Warehousing |
3 | * | 10.44 | 3,510,294 | ||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
9 | * | 10.54 | 1,147,813 | ||||||||||||||||
Administrative and support services |
3 | * | 9.35 | 952,803 | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate and rental and leasing |
1 | * | 9.50 | 713,828 | ||||||||||||||||
Construction |
4 | * | 9.13 | 417,271 | ||||||||||||||||
Finance and insurance |
5 | * | 10.41 | 327,097 | ||||||||||||||||
Arts, entertainment, and recreation |
1 | * | 10.53 | 82,533 | ||||||||||||||||
Professional, scientific, and technical services |
1 | * | 10.25 | 42,107 | ||||||||||||||||
Information |
1 | * | 10.00 | 31,411 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
46 | 4 | % | 9.49 | $ | 19,186,662 | ||||||||||||||
Other secured commercial (74% New York, 7% New Jersey, and 19% all other states) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Transportation and warehousing |
53 | 1 | % | 6.98 | % | $ | 4,936,577 | |||||||||||||
Retail trade |
21 | 1 | 11.37 | 4,830,094 | ||||||||||||||||
Accommodation and food services |
29 | 1 | 8.77 | 4,486,989 | ||||||||||||||||
Other services (except public administration) |
27 | 1 | 8.01 | 3,412,792 | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate and rental and leasing |
11 | 1 | 7.93 | 3,342,696 | ||||||||||||||||
Construction |
1 | * | 7.25 | 2,390,436 | ||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
4 | * | 11.91 | 1,517,876 | ||||||||||||||||
Information |
2 | * | 11.70 | 915,296 | ||||||||||||||||
Arts, entertainment, and recreation |
1 | * | 9.00 | 112,752 | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale trade |
2 | * | 8.50 | 33,062 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
151 | 5 | % | 8.85 | $ | 25,978,570 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
232 | 18 | % | 11.79 | % | $ | 98,372,624 | |||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
(87,980 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(6,799,165 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans, net |
$ | 91,485,479 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents the weighted average interest rate of the respective portfolio as of the date indicated. |
F-33
Table of Contents
Medallion Financial Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments ( as adjusted)
December 31,2005
Industry | State | Security Type |
% Held | # of Investment |
%of Total |
Interest Rate (1) |
Investment Balances |
||||||||||||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Medallion Bank** Salt Lake City, Utah |
Commercial banking |
Utah | Common stock |
100 | % | 1 | 7 | % | 0.00 | % | $ | 39,460,546 | |||||||||||
Medallion Hamptons Holding, LLC 437 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022 |
Real Estate | NY | Membership Interests |
100 | % | 1 | * | 0.00 | 874,846 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
2 | 7 | % | 0.00 | % | 40,335,393 | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on investments in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries, net |
|
$ | 40,335,393 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.** 200 East Basse Road San Antonio, TX 78209 |
Broadcasting - Radio |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | 4 | % | 2.39 | % | $ | 20,464,315 | |||||||||||||
Live Nation Inc** 9348 Civic Center Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 |
Live event, Venue & Distribution |
Common Stock |
1 | * | 0..00 | 1,037,389 | |||||||||||||||||
PMC Commercial Trust ** 17950 Preston Road, Suite 600 Dallas, TX 75252 |
Real Estate Investment Trust |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | * | 9.8 | 900,897 | ||||||||||||||||
Micromedics, Inc. 1270 Eagan Industrial Road St. Paul, MN 55121-1385 |
Medical Device Manufacturer |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | * | 0.00 | 58,828 | ||||||||||||||||
Star Concessions, Ltd. 8008 Cedar Springs Road, Terminal Building LB Dallas, TX 75235 |
Airport Food and Retail |
Limited Partnership Interest |
45 | % | 1 | * | 0.00 | 40,000 | |||||||||||||||
Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc.** 7400 Excelsior Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426-4516 |
Appliance Recycler |
Common Stock |
* | 1 | * | 0.00 | 7,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 4 | % | 1.53 | % | 22,508,929 | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on equities |
628,732 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity investments, net |
$ | 23,137,661 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total investments at cost |
1,945 | 100 | % | 6.78 | % | $ | 536,529,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
960,003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on investments in Medallion Bank and other controlled subsidiaries |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on equities |
628,732 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on loans |
(7,896,299 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investments ($405,817,000 pledged as collateral under borrowing arrangements) |
|
$ | 530,221,936 | ||||||||||||||||||||
* | Less than 1.0% |
** | Not an eligible portfolio company as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(46) of the 1940 Act. |
(1) | Represents the weighted average interest rate of the respective portfolio as of the date indicated. |
F-34
Table of Contents
Medallion Bank
(A wholly owned subsidiary of Medallion Financial Corp.)
Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004
F-35
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Medallion Bank
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Medallion Bank (the Bank) (a wholly owned subsidiary of Medallion Financial Corp.) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Banks management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Bank as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with US generally accepted accounting principles.
Weiser LLP New York, New York March 28, 2007 |
F-36
Table of Contents
REPORT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Medallion Bank
We have audited the accompanying statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Medallion Bank (the Bank). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Banks management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of the Banks operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Florham Park, New Jersey
January 21, 2005
F-37
Table of Contents
Medallion Bank
For the years ended December 31,
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
Interest income |
|||||||||||
Investments |
$ | 1,589,039 | $ | 1,003,954 | $ | 447,005 | |||||
Loan interest including fees |
28,386,375 | 21,399,022 | 13,879,198 | ||||||||
Total revenues |
29,975,414 | 22,402,976 | 14,326,203 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
10,453,732 | 6,413,604 | 3,244,540 | ||||||||
Net interest income |
19,521,682 | 15,989,372 | 11,081,663 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,197,752 | 3,279,713 | 2,049,425 | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
16,323,930 | 12,709,659 | 9,032,238 | ||||||||
Non-interest income |
490,128 | 408,047 | 135,891 | ||||||||
Gain/(loss) on sale of assets |
26,378 | (164,103 | ) | (167,993 | ) | ||||||
Non-interest expense |
|||||||||||
Loan servicing |
2,951,525 | 2,505,815 | 1,933,910 | ||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
1,953,858 | 1,655,117 | 975,363 | ||||||||
Professional fees |
497,368 | 311,369 | 369,472 | ||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
154,392 | 203,956 | 95,973 | ||||||||
Advertising |
51,565 | 92,632 | 55,639 | ||||||||
Other |
680,301 | 774,845 | 438,864 | ||||||||
Non-interest expense |
6,289,009 | 5,543,734 | 3,869,221 | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
10,551,427 | 7,409,869 | 5,130,915 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,387,959 | 1,972,920 | 1,911,837 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,163,468 | $ | 5,436,949 | $ | 3,219,078 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-38
Table of Contents
Balance Sheets
December 31,
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, substantially all of which are federal funds sold |
$ | 14,698,919 | $ | 20,227,118 | ||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
21,682,923 | 18,092,838 | ||||||
Loans, net of deferred loan acquisition costs |
273,896,578 | 221,733,068 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(6,056,785 | ) | (5,025,131 | ) | ||||
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
267,839,793 | 216,707,937 | ||||||
Repossessed inventory |
772,845 | 480,898 | ||||||
Other assets |
4,232,671 | 3,313,700 | ||||||
Fixed assets, net |
184,091 | 160,199 | ||||||
Taxes receivable |
19,408 | | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
| 226,201 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 309,430,650 | $ | 259,208,891 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Time deposits, including accrued interest payable of $3,227,540 in 2006 and $2,090,214 in 2005 |
$ | 261,483,540 | $ | 219,107,214 | ||||
Subordinated debt |
105,553 | 305,553 | ||||||
Due to affiliates |
161,694 | 213,449 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
485,339 | 340,687 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability, net |
347,057 | | ||||||
Taxes payable |
| 105,676 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
262,583,183 | 220,072,579 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
| | ||||||
Shareholders equity |
||||||||
Common stock, $1 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, |
||||||||
1,000,000 issued and outstanding |
1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
32,200,000 | 30,650,000 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(245,410 | ) | (243,097 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
13,892,877 | 7,729,409 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
46,847,467 | 39,136,312 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 309,430,650 | $ | 259,208,891 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-39
Table of Contents
Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Retained Earnings |
Total Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 |
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 21,000,000 | $ | | ($ | 926,718 | ) | $ | 21,073,282 | |||||||
Capital Contributions |
| 9,200,000 | | 9,200,000 | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 3,219,078 | 3,219,078 | |||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on investment securities |
| | (49,219 | ) | | (49,219 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
1,000,000 | 30,200,000 | (49,219 | ) | 2,292,360 | 33,443,141 | ||||||||||||
Capital Contributions |
| 450,000 | | | 450,000 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 5,436,949 | 5,436,949 | |||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on investment securities |
| | (193,878 | ) | | (193,878 | ) | |||||||||||
Other |
| | | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
1,000,000 | 30,650,000 | (243,097 | ) | 7,729,409 | 39,136,312 | ||||||||||||
Capital Contributions |
| 1,550,000 | | | 1,550,000 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 6,163,468 | 6,163,468 | |||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on investment securities |
| | (2,313 | ) | | (2,313 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 32,200,000 | ($ | 245,410 | ) | $ | 13,892,877 | $ | 46,847,467 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-40
Table of Contents
Statement of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31,
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Net income from operations |
$ | 6,163,468 | $ | 5,436,949 | $ | 3,219,078 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
47,208 | 126,677 | 43,928 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,197,752 | 3,279,713 | 4,106,428 | |||||||||
Amortization of premium (discount) on investments |
276,737 | 176,767 | ||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Change in repossessed inventory |
(291,947 | ) | 52,535 | |||||||||
Change in interest receivable |
(733,748 | ) | (448,210 | ) | (1,300,277 | ) | ||||||
Change in other assets |
(185,224 | ) | (650,273 | ) | (1,812,639 | ) | ||||||
Change in other liabilities |
144,652 | 95,344 | 524,470 | |||||||||
Change in interest payable |
1,137,326 | 773,179 | 1,317,035 | |||||||||
Change in taxes payable |
(125,084 | ) | 82,819 | |||||||||
Change in deferred tax asset |
730,159 | (226,201 | ) | 22,857 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
10,361,299 | 8,699,299 | 6,120,880 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
(71,100 | ) | (103,106 | ) | (31,384 | ) | ||||||
Increase in loans |
(54,329,607 | ) | (35,305,845 | ) | (188,415,618 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of investments |
(8,305,414 | ) | (8,769,496 | ) | (16,361,617 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from maturity of investments |
4,279,379 | 4,904,850 | 1,713,561 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(58,426,742 | ) | (39,273,597 | ) | (203,095,058 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Change in due to parent/affiliates |
(51,756 | ) | (458,824 | ) | (441,806 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of time deposits |
297,782,000 | 179,542,000 | 185,221,000 | |||||||||
Proceeds from maturity of time deposits |
(256,543,000 | ) | (147,746,000 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from payment of subordinated debt |
(200,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from capital contributions |
1,550,000 | 450,000 | 9,200,000 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
42,537,244 | 31,787,176 | 193,979,194 | |||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(5,528,199 | ) | 1,212,878 | (2,994,984 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
20,227,118 | 19,014,240 | 22,009,224 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
$ | 14,698,919 | $ | 20,227,118 | $ | 19,014,240 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 8,617,151 | $ | 5,055,254 | $ | 1,531,779 | ||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
3,782,883 | 2,138,000 | 1,553,340 | |||||||||
Loans transferred to repossessed inventory |
3,664,350 | 3,161,576 | 533,433 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-41
Table of Contents
Notes To Financial Statements
For the year ended December 31, 2006
1. | Organization and summary of significant accounting policies |
Description of business Medallion Bank (the Bank) is a limited service industrial bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. The Bank was formed in May 2002 for the purpose of obtaining an industrial bank (IB) charter pursuant to the laws of the State of Utah. The Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary of Medallion Financial Corp. (Medallion). The Bank originates asset-based commercial loans and commercial loans to finance the purchase of taxi medallions (licenses), both of which are marketed and serviced by the Banks affiliates who have extensive prior experience in these asset groups. The Bank also originates consumer loans on a national basis that are secured by marine, recreational vehicle, and horse trailer products to customers with prior credit blemishes. Time certificates of deposits are originated nationally through a variety of brokered deposit relationships.
Basis of presentation The Banks financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and prevailing industry practices, which require management to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates, by their nature, are based upon judgment and available information. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents The Bank considers all highly liquid instruments with an original purchased maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Investment securities Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," requires that all applicable investments be classified as trading securities, available-for-sale securities, or held-to-maturity securities. The Bank had $21,683,000 and $18,093,000 of investments at fair value as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The statement further requires that held-to-maturity securities be reported at amortized costs and available-for-sale securities be reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings, at the date of the financial statements and reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of shareholders equity, net of the effect of income taxes, until they are sold. The Bank had $402,000 and $243,000 net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At the time of sale, any gains or losses, calculated by the specific identification method, will be recognized as a component of operating results and any amounts previously included in shareholders equity will be reversed.
Loans Loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred loan acquisition costs, which primarily includes deferred fees paid to loan originators, and which is amortized to interest income over the life of the loan. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Loans are usually charged-off when they are 120 days contractually past due unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection or bankruptcy or when, in the opinion of management, full collection of principal and interest is unlikely. All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are charged off is reversed against interest income. For the consumer loan portfolio, the process to repossess the collateral is started at 60 days past due. If the collateral is not located and the account reaches 120 days delinquent, the account is charged off. If the collateral is repossessed, a loss is recorded to write the loan down to its fair value less selling costs, and the collateral is sent to auction. When the collateral is sold, the net auction proceeds are applied to the account, and any remaining balance is written off, and any excess proceeds are recorded as a realized gain. Proceeds collected on charged off accounts are recorded as recovery. Total loans over 90 days past due were $631,109, $694,679 and $541,402 at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is likely the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. Management considers loans that are in bankruptcy status, but have not been charged-off, to be impaired. These loans are charged-down to fair value and placed on nonaccrual status. All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. At December 31, 2006, $504,000 of consumer loans to individuals in bankruptcy, representing less than 1% of consumer loans, were placed on nonaccrual. The amount of interest income on nonaccrual loans that would have been recognized if the loans had been paying in accordance with their original terms was approximately $22,000 in 2006. None of the Banks medallion or commercial loans were on nonaccrual as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Allowance for loan losses In analyzing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Bank uses historical delinquency and actual loss rates acquired from Medallion and the unrelated financial institution from which the consumer portfolio was purchased from. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon managements periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions, and excess concentration risks. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Credit losses are deducted from the allowance and subsequent recoveries are added.
Fixed assets Fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense while significant improvements are capitalized. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Capitalized leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining lease term.
F-42
Table of Contents
Income taxes The Bank uses the asset and liability method in providing income taxes on all transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their existing tax bases. The Bank files its tax returns on a separate company basis.
Other Comprehensive loss The Bank had $159,000, $194,000, and $49,000 of net unrealized losses due to the mark-to-market of available-for-sale securities for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 respectively. The Bank had no other components of comprehensive loss.
Restrictions on Dividends, Loans, and Advances Banking regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid and loans or advances made by the Bank to Medallion. The total amount of dividends that may be paid at any date is generally limited to the retained earnings of the Bank. However, dividends paid by the Bank would be prohibited if the effect thereof would cause the Banks capital to be reduced below applicable minimum standards. The Bank was restricted from paying dividends in the first three years of operations.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, which excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements.
Recently issued financial accounting standard In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123R), which supercedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The revised statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees and other third parties, eliminates the ability to account for share-based transactions using APB No. 25 and requires that the compensation costs relating to such transactions be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. FAS No. 123R requires additional disclosures relating to the income tax and cash flow effects resulting from share-based payments. The provisions of FAS No. 123R were effective July 1, 2005. This standard had no impact on the Banks financial condition or results of operations.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting For Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The interpretation sets a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for recognizing tax positions in a companys financial statements based on a determination whether it is likely or not that the tax position would withstand a tax audit, without regard for the likelihood of a tax audit taking place. Assuming a position meets the more-likely-than-not threshold, the interpretation also prescribes a measurement attribute requiring determination of how much of the tax position would ultimately be allowed if challenged. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
2. | Loans and allowance for loan losses |
Loans are summarized as follows at December 31:
2006 | 2005 | |||||
Loans |
||||||
Consumer |
$ | 115,669,616 | $ | 91,158,486 | ||
Taxi medallion |
94,891,270 | 73,987,163 | ||||
Commercial |
||||||
Asset-based |
56,841,484 | 52,898,035 | ||||
Construction |
3,372,624 | 2,079,867 | ||||
Total commercial |
60,214,108 | 54,977,902 | ||||
Deferred loan acquisition costs |
3,121,584 | 1,609,517 | ||||
Total loans |
$ | 273,896,578 | $ | 221,733,068 | ||
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:
Balance at 12/31/03 |
$ | - | ||
Allowance for loan losses of loans acquired |
4,243,854 | |||
Provisions for loan losses |
2,049,425 | |||
Recoveries |
160,897 | |||
Loan charge-offs |
(2,347,748 | ) | ||
Balance at 12/31/04 |
4,106,428 | |||
Provision for loan losses |
3,279,713 | |||
Recoveries |
758,377 | |||
Loan charge-offs |
(3,119,387 | ) | ||
Balance at 12/31/05 |
5,025,131 | |||
Provision for loan losses |
3,197,752 | |||
Recoveries |
1,132,839 | |||
Loan charge-offs |
(3,298,937 | ) | ||
Balance at 12/31/06 |
$ | 6,056,785 | ||
The loan charge-offs resulted from the consumer portfolio.
F-43
Table of Contents
3. | Investment securities |
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2006 consists of the following:
Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities, principally obligations of U.S. federal agencies |
$ | 18,905,235 | $ | 30,784 | $ | 271,461 | $ | 18,664,558 | ||||
State and municipalities |
3,180,000 | 988 | 162,623 | 3,018,365 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 22,085,235 | $ | 31,772 | $ | 434,084 | $ | 21,682,923 | ||||
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2005 consists of the following:
Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities, principally obligations of U.S. federal agencies |
$ | 16,840,935 | $ | 10,926 | $ | 215,330 | $ | 16,636,531 | ||||
State and municipalities |
1,495,000 | 38,693 | 1,456,307 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 18,335,935 | $ | 10,926 | $ | 254,023 | $ | 18,092,838 | ||||
The amortized cost and estimated market value of investment securities as of December 31, 2006 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties:
Amortized Cost | Market Value | |||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | | $ | | ||
Due after one year through five years |
2,753,496 | 2,770,111 | ||||
Due after five years through ten years |
4,280,000 | 4,125,268 | ||||
Due after ten years |
15,051,739 | 14,787,544 | ||||
Total |
$ | 22,085,235 | $ | 21,682,923 | ||
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2006 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position follows:
Less than Twelve Months | Over Twelve Months | |||||||||||
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities, principally obligations of U.S. federal agencies |
($27,193 | ) | $ | 1,885,660 | ($244,268 | ) | $ | 10,143,576 | ||||
State and municipalities |
(56,580 | ) | 1,668,420 | (106,042 | ) | 948,958 | ||||||
Total |
($83,773 | ) | $ | 3,554,080 | ($350,310 | ) | $ | 11,092,534 | ||||
Unrealized losses on securities have not been recognized into income because the issuers bonds are of high credit quality, and the Bank has the intent and ability to hold the securities for the foreseeable future. The decline in fair value is primarily due to increased market interest rates. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach the maturity date. There have been no sales of investment securities since the Banks inception.
F-44
Table of Contents
4. | Fixed assets |
Fixed assets and their related useful lives at December 31 were as following:
Useful lives | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
Equipment |
5 years | $ | 23,104 | $ | 23,104 | |||||
Telephone equipment |
5-10 years | 29,643 | 29,643 | |||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
5-10 years | 74,503 | 74,503 | |||||||
Deposit system |
3-5 years | 13,975 | 152,983 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements |
3-5 years | 55,962 | 55,962 | |||||||
Computer software |
3 years | 99,537 | 28,437 | |||||||
296,724 | 364,632 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(112,633 | ) | (204,433 | ) | ||||||
Net fixed assets |
$ | 184,091 | $ | 160,199 | ||||||
5. | Deposits |
At December 31, 2006 the scheduled maturities of all time deposits were as follows:
2007 |
$ | 111,869,000 | |
2008 |
76,575,000 | ||
2009 |
68,378,000 | ||
2010 |
4,500,000 | ||
Total |
$ | 261,484,000 | |
All time deposits are in denominations of less than $100,000 and have been originated through Certificate of Deposit Broker relationships. The weighted average interest rate of deposits outstanding at December 31, 2006 was 4.36%.
6. | Income taxes |
Income taxes are summarized as follows:
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||
Current |
||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 3,168,568 | $ | 1,938,554 | $ | 1,463,361 | ||||
State |
489,231 | 303,255 | 220,072 | |||||||
Deferred |
||||||||||
Federal |
730,160 | (37,107 | ) | 200,167 | ||||||
State |
| (5,580 | ) | 28,237 | ||||||
Provision |
4,387,959 | 2,199,122 | 1,911,837 | |||||||
Change in Valuation allowance for tax assets |
| (226,202 | ) | | ||||||
Net provision for income taxes |
$ | 4,387,959 | $ | 1,972,920 | $ | 1,911,837 | ||||
The following table reconciles the provision for income taxes to the US federal statutory income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
US federal statutory tax rate |
34.0 | % | 34.0 | % | 34.0 | % | |||
State taxes |
4.6 | 4.1 | 3.0 | ||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
| (3.1 | ) | | |||||
Prior year under (over) accrual |
7.4 | (4.5 | ) | | |||||
Other |
(4.4 | ) | (3.9 | ) | 0.2 | ||||
Effective income tax rate |
41.6 | % | 26.6 | % | 37.2 | % | |||
The difference between the federal statutory income tax rate and the Banks effective income tax rate applicable to income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 was primarily due to state taxes and adjustments of prior year deferred tax asset.
The Bank files its tax returns on a separate company basis. In 2003, the Bank set up a valuation reserve for the deferred tax asset, as it did not have an operating history to demonstrate that it would realize such net operating losses. The valuation reserve was reversed by $297,000 in 2005.
Tax balances reflected in the balance sheet were as follows:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Deferred tax asset unrealized loss on investments |
$ | 156,901 | $ | | ||||
Loan origination fees |
(1,215,572 | ) | (726,268 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
676,194 | 333,683 | ||||||
Other |
35,420 | 166,384 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability, net |
(503,958 | ) | 226,201 | |||||
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
$ | (347,057 | ) | $ | 226,201 | |||
F-45
Table of Contents
7. | Other transactions with affiliates |
The Banks taxi medallion and asset-based commercial loans aggregated approximately $151,733 and $126,885,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These loans are marketed and serviced by the affiliates. The Bank paid $1,327,000, $1,292,000, and $1,015,000 for loan servicing fees to affiliates for 2006, 2005, and 2004. Origination fees of $540,000, $396,000 and $494,000 were capitalized as deferred costs and will be amortized to interest income over the life of the loan for 2006, 2005, and 2004. Amortization costs were $567,000, $350,000 and $213,000 for 2006, 2005 and 2004.
As part of the settlement for the purchase of the taxi medallion loans, the Bank issued a subordinated promissory note to Medallion for $305,553 in 2004. The promissory note is interest bearing at the rate of 3 month LIBOR plus 125 basis points, adjustable quarterly and interest paid monthly. The promissory note will be used to cover any loss that may arise in the taxi medallion loan purchased portfolio. The note was paid down to $105,553 in 2006. The remaining balance of the promissory note will be repaid to Medallion after the purchased portfolio has liquidated. Interest expense of approximately $15,000 was paid on this note for each of 2006, 2005, and 2004.
At December 31, 2006, the Bank owed affiliates $162,000 for origination fees, monthly servicing fees on loans, charges for corporate overhead, legal and business development expenses net of payments due the Bank on collection of loan payments by affiliates.
The bank reimbursed Medallion for expenses incurred on its behalf of $167,000, $170,000, and $302,000 for 2006, 2005, and 2004.
8. | 401(k) plan |
The Bank participates in the 401(k) plan offered by Medallion. The 401(k) Plan covers all full and part-time employees of the Bank who have attained the age of 21 and have a minimum of one year of service. Under the 401(k) Plan, an employee may elect to defer not less than 1% and no more than 15% of the total annual compensation that would otherwise be paid to the employee, provided however, that employees contributions may not exceed certain maximum amounts determined under the Internal Revenue Code. Employee contributions are invested in various mutual funds according to the directions of the employee. At the discretion of Medallions Board of Directors, the Bank can provide for employer matching contributions. Medallion has elected to match employee contributions up to one-third of the employees contribution, but not greater than 2% of the portion of the employees annual salary eligible for 401(k) benefits. For the year ended December 31, 2006 the Bank provided $10,707 in employer matching, which amount is included in salaries and benefits expense on the accompanying statement of operations.
9. | Commitments and contingencies |
Lines of credit At December 31, 2006, the Bank had unsecured Federal Funds lines with correspondent banks of $35,000,000.
Loans At December 31, 2006, the Bank had commitments to extend credit of $18,560,000 to asset-based customers as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. The Bank had commitments to extend credit of $1,963,000 to real estate customers for unfunded amounts.
Leases The Bank leases office space under a non-cancelable operating lease that expires November 30, 2007. Rental expense related to the lease was $112,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Bank has the option to extend the lease term for an additional five years.
Future minimum lease payments under this operating lease as of December 31, 2006 were as follows:
2007 |
$ | 77,025 | |
2008 |
| ||
Total |
$ | 77,025 | |
F-46
Table of Contents
On February 26, 2007 the Bank leased additional office space adjacent to the main office. The future minimum lease payments under this operating lease are as follows:
2007 |
$ | 29,272 | |
2008 |
31,462 | ||
2009 |
32,412 | ||
Total |
$ | 93,146 | |
10. | Capital requirements |
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (UDFI). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Banks financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Banks assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Banks capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the bank regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios as defined in the regulations (set forth in the table below). Additionally, as conditions of granting the Banks application for federal deposit insurance, the FDIC ordered that beginning paid-in-capital funds of not less than $22,000,000 be provided, and that a ratio of Tier 1 Capital as defined in section 325.2 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations (12 C.F.R. § 325.2), to total assets of not less than 15% will be maintained, and an adequate allowance for loan losses shall be maintained and no dividends shall be paid throughout the first three years of operation. Management believes, as of December 31, 2006, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
The Banks actual and the regulatory minimum capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:
Actual | Minimum for Capital Adequacy Purposes |
Minimum To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2006 |
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) |
$ | 47,093,000 | 15.7 | % | $ | 11,979,160 | 4.0 | % | $ | 14,973,950 | 5.0 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
47,093,000 | 16.6 | 11,380,960 | 4.0 | 17,071,440 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Total Capital (to risk-weighted |
50,680,000 | 17.8 | 22,761,920 | 8.0 | 28,452,400 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||
F-47