MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC - Quarter Report: 2015 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 001-32559

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (205) 969-3755

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of August 7, 2015, Medical Properties Trust, Inc. had 208,914,827 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, outstanding.

Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, of Medical Properties Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, through which Medical Properties Trust, Inc. conducts substantially all of its operations. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our company,” “Medical Properties,” “MPT,” or “the company” refer to Medical Properties Trust, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references to “our operating partnership” or “the operating partnership” refer to MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. together with its consolidated subsidiaries.

Table of Contents

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2015

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

8

Table of Contents

MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

9

Table of Contents

MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

10

Table of Contents

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC., AND MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization

Medical Properties Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was formed on August 27, 2003, under the Maryland General Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in, owning, and leasing commercial real estate. Our operating partnership subsidiary, MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., (the “Operating Partnership”) through which we conduct all of our operations, was formed in September 2003. Through another wholly-owned subsidiary, Medical Properties Trust, LLC, we are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. At present, we directly own substantially all of the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership and have elected to report our required disclosures and that of the Operating Partnership on a combined basis except where material differences exist.

We have operated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) since April 6, 2004, and accordingly, elected REIT status upon the filing in September 2005 of the calendar year 2004 federal income tax return. Accordingly, we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT and our distributions to our stockholders equal or exceed our taxable income. Certain activities we undertake must be conducted by entities which we elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). Our TRSs are subject to both U.S. federal and state income taxes. For our properties located outside the United States, we are subject to local taxes; however, we do not expect to incur additional taxes in the United States as such income will flow through our REIT.

Our primary business strategy is to acquire and develop real estate and improvements, primarily for long-term lease to providers of healthcare services such as operators of general acute care hospitals, inpatient physical rehabilitation hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals, surgery centers, centers for treatment of specific conditions such as cardiac, pulmonary, cancer, and neurological hospitals, and other healthcare-oriented facilities. We also make mortgage and other loans to operators of similar facilities. In addition, we may obtain profits or equity interests in our tenants, from time to time, in order to enhance our overall return. We manage our business as a single business segment. All of our properties are located in the United States and Europe.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information, including rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.

For information about significant accounting policies, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, there were no material changes to these policies.

11

Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Developments:

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” Under the new standard, revenue is recognized at the time a good or service is transferred to a customer for the amount of consideration received for that specific good or service. Entities may use a full retrospective approach or report the cumulative effect as of the date of adoption.

On April 1, 2015, the FASB proposed deferring the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017, for annual reporting periods beginning after that date. The FASB also proposed permitting early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. We do not expect this standard to have a significant impact on our financial results. as a substantial portion of our revenue consists of rental income from leasing arrangements, which are specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09.

Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” This standard amends existing guidance to require the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of a deferred charge. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption is permitted.

Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis

In February 2015, the FASB issued an ASU 2015-02 that modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption is permitted.

12

Table of Contents

Variable Interest Entities

At June 30, 2015, we had loans to and/or equity investments in certain variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which are also tenants of our facilities, including Ernest Health, Inc. (“Ernest”). We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs. The carrying value and classification of the related assets and maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with these VIEs are presented below at June 30, 2015 (in thousands):

For the VIE types above, we do not consolidate the VIE because we do not have the ability to control the activities (such as the day-to-day healthcare operations of our borrower or investees) that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. As of June 30, 2015, we were not required to provide any material financial support through a liquidity arrangement or otherwise to our unconsolidated VIEs, including circumstances in which it could be exposed to further losses (e.g., cash short falls).

Typically, our loans are collateralized by assets of the borrower (some assets of which are on the premises of facilities owned by us) and further supported by limited guarantees made by certain principals of the borrower.

See Note 3 for additional description of the nature, purpose and activities of our more significant VIEs and interests therein.

13

Table of Contents

3. Real Estate and Lending Activities

Acquisitions

2015 Activity

MEDIAN Transaction Update

On April 29, 2015, we entered into a series of definitive agreements with Median Kliniken S.à r.l., (“MEDIAN”), a German provider of post-acute and acute rehabilitation services, to acquire the real estate assets of 32 hospitals owned by MEDIAN for an aggregate purchase price of approximately €688 million. Upon acquisition, each property became subject to a master lease between us and MEDIAN providing for the leaseback of the property to MEDIAN. The master lease has an initial term of 27 years and provides for an initial GAAP lease rate of 9.3%, with annual escalators at the greater of one percent or 70% of the German consumer price index. We expect to acquire three additional facilities from MEDIAN in a substantially similar sale-leaseback transaction subject to the master lease, resulting in an aggregate purchase price for all acquired facilities of approximately €705 million.

MEDIAN is owned by an affiliate of Waterland Private Equity Fund V C.V. (“Waterland”), which acquired 94.9% of the outstanding equity interests in MEDIAN, and by a subsidiary of our operating partnership, which acquired the remaining 5.1% of the outstanding equity interests in MEDIAN, each in December 2014. In December 2014, we provided interim acquisition loans to affiliates of Waterland and MEDIAN in connection with Waterland’s acquisition of its stake in MEDIAN in an aggregate amount of approximately €425 million. In addition, we made further loans to MEDIAN during the first half of 2015 in an aggregate amount of approximately €240 million, which were used by MEDIAN to repay existing debt on properties we have acquired or expect to acquire. We may make additional loans to MEDIAN for the purpose of repaying existing property debt, up to a total aggregate amount of all loans to Waterland and MEDIAN in the amount of approximately €705 million.

Closing of the sale-leaseback transactions, which began in the second quarter of 2015, is subject to customary real estate, regulatory and other closing conditions, including waiver of any statutory pre-emption rights by local municipalities and antitrust clearance. At each closing, the purchase price for each facility will be reduced and offset against the interim loans made to affiliates of Waterland and MEDIAN as described above and against the amount of any debt assumed or repaid by us in connection with the closing. As of June 30, 2015, we have closed on 17 of the 35 properties for an aggregate amount of €317 million ($354 million). As of August 1, 2015, we have closed on 30 of the 35 (including the three additional facilities) properties subject to the agreements for a cumulative purchase price to date of approximately €627 million.

Other Acquisitions

On June 16, 2015, we acquired the real estate of two facilities in Lubbock, Texas, a 60-bed inpatient rehabilitation hospital and a 37-bed long term acute care hospital, for an aggregate purchase price of $31.5 million. We entered into a 20-year lease with Ernest for the rehabilitation hospital, which provides for three five-year extension options, and separately entered into a lease with Ernest for the long-term acute care hospital that has a final term ending December 31, 2034. In connection with the transaction, we funded an acquisition loan to Ernest of approximately $12.0 million. Ernest will operate the rehabilitation hospital in a joint venture with Covenant Health System, while the long term acute care hospital will continue to be operated by Fundamental Health under a new sublease with Ernest.

14

Table of Contents

On February 27, 2015, we acquired an inpatient rehabilitation hospital in Weslaco, Texas for $10.7 million leased to Ernest pursuant to the 2012 master lease which has a remaining 17-year fixed term and three five year extension options. This lease provides for consumer-priced-indexed annual rent increases, subject to a floor and a cap. In addition we agreed to fund an acquisition loan in the amount of $5 million.

On February 13, 2015, we acquired two general acute care hospitals in the Kansas City area for $110 million. Affiliates of Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Prime”) is the tenant and operator pursuant to a new master lease that has similar terms and security enhancements as the other master lease agreements entered into in 2013. This master lease has a 10 year initial fixed term with two extension options of five years each. The lease provides for consumer-price-indexed annual rent increases, subject to a specified floor. In addition, we agreed to fund a mortgage loan in the amount of $40 million, which has a 10-year term.

2014 Activity

On March 31, 2014, we acquired a general acute care hospital and an adjacent parcel of land for an aggregate purchase price of $115 million from a joint venture of LHP Hospital Group, Inc. and Hackensack University Medical Center Mountainside. The facility was simultaneously leased back to the seller under a lease with a 15-year initial term with a 3-year extension option, followed by a further 12-year extension option at fair market value. The lease provides for consumer price-indexed annual rent increases, subject to a specified floor and ceiling. The lease includes a customary right of first refusal with respect to a subsequent proposed sale of the facility.

As part of these acquisitions, we acquired the following assets:

The purchase price allocations attributable to the 2015 acquisitions are preliminary. When all relevant information is obtained, resulting changes, if any, to our provisional purchase price allocation will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect new information obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed as of the respective acquisition dates that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized as of those dates.

From the respective acquisition dates, the properties and mortgage loans acquired in 2015 contributed $4.2 million and $3.5 million of revenue and income (excluding related acquisition expenses), respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2015. From the respective acquisition dates, the properties and mortgage loans acquired in 2015 contributed $6.2 million and $4.9 million of revenue and income (excluding related acquisition expenses), respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2015. In addition, we incurred $22.6 million and $26.7 million of acquisition related costs on the 2015 acquisitions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

From the respective acquisition dates in 2014, the 2014 acquisitions contributed $2.3 million and $1.6 million of revenue and income (excluding related acquisition and financing expenses), respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. In addition, we incurred $0.4 million of acquisition related costs on the 2014 acquisitions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Pro Forma Information

The following unaudited supplemental pro forma operating data is presented for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, as if each acquisition (including completed development projects) was completed on January 1, 2014. Supplemental pro forma earnings were adjusted to exclude acquisition-related costs on consummated deals incurred. The unaudited supplemental pro forma operating data is not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations would have been assuming the transactions had been completed as set forth above, nor do they purport to represent our results of operations for future periods (in thousands, except per share/unit amounts).

15

Table of Contents

Development Activities

During the first six months of 2015, we completed construction and began recording rental income on the following facilities:

On June 16, 2015, we entered into definitive agreements to acquire the real estate of a general acute care hospital under development located in Spain, for an aggregate purchase and development price to us of approximately €21.4 million. The acquisition will be effected through a newly-formed joint venture between us and clients of AXA Real Estate, in which we will own a 50% interest. Upon completion, the facility will be leased to a Spanish operator of acute care hospitals, pursuant to a long-term lease. Closing of the transaction which is expected during the second half of 2015, is subject to customary real estate, regulatory and other closing conditions.

On May 5, 2015, we entered into an agreement to finance the development of and lease an inpatient rehabilitation facility in Toledo, Ohio for $19.2 million, which will be leased to Ernest under the 2012 master lease. The facility is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2016.

In April 2015, we executed an agreement with Adeptus Health that provides for the acquisition and development of general acute care hospitals and free standing emergency facilities with an aggregate commitment of $250 million. These facilities will be leased to Adeptus Health pursuant to the terms of the 2014 master lease agreement that has a 15-year initial term with three extension options of five years each that provides for annual rent increases based on changes in the consumer price index with a 2% minimum.

See table below for a status update on our current development projects (in thousands):

16

Table of Contents

Leasing Operations

All of our leases are accounted for as operating leases except for the master lease of 15 Ernest facilities and five Prime facilities which are accounted for as direct financing leases (“DFLs”). The components of our net investment in DFLs consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

17

Table of Contents

Florence facility

On March 6, 2013, the tenant of our $27.1 million facility in Phoenix, Arizona filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. At June 30, 2015, we have approximately $1.1 million of receivables outstanding but the tenant continues to pay us in accordance with bankruptcy orders. In addition, we have a letter of credit for approximately $1.2 million to cover any rent and other monetary payments not paid. Although no assurances can be made that we will not have any impairment charges in the future, we believe our investment in Florence at June 30, 2015 is fully recoverable.

Gilbert facility

In the first quarter of 2014, the tenant of our facility in Gilbert, Arizona filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy; however, we sent notice of termination of the lease prior to the bankruptcy filing. As a result of the lease terminating, we recorded a charge of approximately $1 million to reserve against the straight-line rent receivables. In addition, we accelerated the amortization of the related lease intangible asset resulting in $1.1 million of additional expense in the 2014 first quarter. The tenant has continued to pay its monetary obligations, and we have agreed to the terms of an amended lease upon the tenant’s bankruptcy exit. Although no assurances can be made that we will not have any impairment charges or write-offs of receivables in the future, we believe our real estate investment in Gilbert of $13.9 million at June 30, 2015 is fully recoverable.

Loans

The following is a summary of our loans (in thousands):

The increase in our mortgage loans is related to the two property acquisition with Prime. See “Acquisition” sub-section for further details.

Our non-mortgage loans typically consist of loans to our tenants for acquisitions and working capital purposes. At June 30, 2015, acquisition loans includes our $114.4 million loans to Ernest plus $376.8 million related to the MEDIAN transaction.

On March 1, 2012, pursuant to our convertible note agreement, we converted $1.7 million of our $5.0 million convertible note into a 9.9% equity interest in the operator of our Hoboken University Medical Center facility. At June 30, 2015, $3.3 million remains outstanding on the convertible note, and we retain the option, subject to regulatory approvals, to convert this remainder into 15.1% of equity interest in the operator.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, revenue from affiliates of Prime (including rent and interest from mortgage loans) accounted for 25.9% and 27.9%, respectively, of total revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, revenue from affiliates of Prime (including rent and interest from mortgage loans) accounted for 25.5% and 28.5%, respectively, of total revenue. From an investment concentration perspective, assets leased and loaned to Prime represented 13.8% and 7.5%, respectively of our total assets, at June 30, 2015. Assets leased and loaned to Prime represented 12.6% and 7.4%, respectively, of our total assets at December 31, 2014.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, revenue from affiliates of MEDIAN accounted for 11.1% and 10.3% of total revenue, respectively. From an investment concentration perspective, MEDIAN represented 17.3% and 11.3% of our total assets at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

18

Table of Contents

For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, revenue from affiliates of Ernest (including rent and interest from mortgage and acquisition loans) accounted for 15.0% and 18.2%, respectively, of total revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, revenue from affiliates of Ernest (including rent and interest from mortgage and acquisition loans) accounted for 15.2% and 18.9%, respectively, of total revenue. From an investment concentration perspective, assets leased and loaned to Ernest represented 7.9% and 5.1%, respectively, of our total assets at June 30, 2015. Assets leased and loaned to Ernest represented 7.7% and 5.3%, respectively, of our total assets at December 31, 2014.

19

Table of Contents

On an individual property basis, we had no investment of any single property greater than 3% of our total assets as of June 30, 2015.

From a global geographic perspective, approximately 75% of our total assets are in the United States while 25% reside in Europe (primarily in Germany) as of June 30, 2015. From a global geographic perspective, approximately 80% of our total assets are in the United States while 20% reside in Europe as of December 31, 2014.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, revenue from our European investments was $18.1 million and $5.5 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, revenue from our European investments was $34.4 million and $10.9 million, respectively.

From a United States geographic perspective, investments located in Texas represented 19.8% of our total assets at June 30, 2015, compared to 20.2% at December 31, 2014. Investments located in California represented 12.9% of our total assets at June 30, 2015, compared to 14.6% at December 31, 2014.

4. Debt

The following is a summary of our debt (dollar amounts in thousands):

As of June 30, 2015, principal payments due for our debt (which exclude the effects of any premiums recorded) are as follows (in thousands):

During the second quarter 2010, we entered into an interest rate swap to manage our exposure to variable interest rates by fixing $65 million of our 2006 Senior Unsecured Notes, which started July 31, 2011 (date on which the interest rate turned variable) through maturity date (or July 2016), at a rate of 5.507%. We also entered into an interest rate swap to fix $60 million of our 2006 Senior Unsecured Notes which started October 31, 2011 (date on which the related interest rate turned variable) through the maturity date (or October 2016) at a rate of 5.675%. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was $4.7 million and $6.0 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, which is reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.

20

Table of Contents

We account for our interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of our swaps is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income/loss on the balance sheet and reclassified into earnings in the same period, or periods, during which the hedged transactions effect earnings, while any ineffective portion is recorded through earnings immediately. We did not have any hedge ineffectiveness from inception of our interest rate swaps through June 30, 2015 and therefore, there was no income statement effect recorded during the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2015 or 2014. At June 30, 2015, we do not expect any of the current losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we have posted $2.5 million and $3.3 million of collateral related to our interest rate swaps, respectively, which is reflected in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.

Covenants

Our debt facilities impose certain restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to: incur debts; create or incur liens; provide guarantees in respect of obligations of any other entity; make redemptions and repurchases of our capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase debt; engage in mergers or consolidations; enter into affiliated transactions; dispose of real estate or other assets; and change our business. In addition, the credit agreements governing our revolving credit facility and term loan limit the amount of dividends we can pay as a percentage of normalized adjusted funds from operations, as defined in the agreements, on a rolling four quarter basis. At June 30, 2015, the dividend restriction was 95% of normalized adjusted FFO. The indentures governing our senior unsecured notes also limit the amount of dividends we can pay based on the sum of 95% of funds from operations, proceeds of equity issuances and certain other net cash proceeds. Finally, our senior unsecured notes require us to maintain total unencumbered assets (as defined in the related indenture) of not less than 150% of our unsecured indebtedness.

In addition to these restrictions, the revolving credit facility and term loan contain customary financial and operating covenants, including covenants relating to our total leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, mortgage secured leverage ratio, recourse mortgage secured leverage ratio, consolidated adjusted net worth, unsecured leverage ratio, and unsecured interest coverage ratio. This facility also contains customary events of default, including among others, nonpayment of principal or interest, material inaccuracy of representations and failure to comply with our covenants. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the facility, the entire outstanding balance may become immediately due and payable. At June 30, 2015, we were in compliance with all such financial and operating covenants.

21

Table of Contents

5. Common Stock/Partners’ Capital

Medical Properties Trust, Inc.

On January 14, 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 34.5 million shares (including the exercise of the underwriters’ 30-day option to purchase an additional 4.5 million shares) of our common stock, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $480 million, after deducting estimated offering expenses.

On March 11, 2014, we completed an underwritten public offering of 7.7 million shares of our common stock, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $100.2 million, after deducting estimated offering expenses. We also granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1.2 million shares of common stock. The option, which was exercised in full, closed on April 8, 2014 and resulted in additional net proceeds of approximately $16 million.

In January 2014, we put an at-the-market equity offering program in place, giving us the ability to sell up to $250 million of stock with a commission of 1.25%. During the first quarter of 2014, we sold 0.9 million shares of our common stock under our at-the-market equity offering program, at an average price of $13.21 per share resulting in total proceeds, net of commission, of $12.3 million.

MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.

At June 30, 2015, the Company has a 99.86% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership with the remainder owned by three other partners, two of whom are employees and one of whom is a director. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the partnership issued 34.5 million and 9.8 million units, respectively, in direct response to the common stock offerings by Medical Properties Trust, Inc.

6. Stock Awards

We adopted the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) during second quarter of 2013, which authorizes the issuance of common stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units and awards of interests in our Operating Partnership. The Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. We have reserved 7,643,651 shares of common stock for awards under the Equity Incentive Plan for which 5,419,441 shares remain available for future stock awards as of June 30, 2015. We awarded the following stock awards during 2015 and 2014:

Time-based awards —We granted 217,177 and 406,055 shares in 2015 and 2014, respectively, of time-based restricted stock to management, independent directors and certain employees. These awards vest quarterly based on service, over three years, in equal amounts.

22

Table of Contents

Performance-based awards —Our management team and certain employees were awarded 176,046 and 384,823 of performance based awards in 2015 and 2014, respectively. These awards vest ratably over a three year period based on the achievement of certain total shareholder return measures, with a carry-back and carry-forward provision through December 31, 2018 (for the 2014 awards) and December 31, 2017 (for the 2015 awards). Dividends on these awards are paid only upon achievement of the performance measures.

Multi-year Performance-based awards —We awarded 505,050 and 500,000 shares in 2015 and 2014, respectively, of multi-year performance-based awards to management. These shares are subject to three-year cumulative performance hurdles based on measures of total shareholder return. At the end of the three-year performance period, any earned shares will be subject to an additional two years of ratable time-based vesting on an annual basis. Dividends are paid on these shares only upon achievement of the performance measures.

7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We have various assets and liabilities that are considered financial instruments. We estimate that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values. Included in our accounts payable and accrued expenses are our interest rate swaps, which are recorded at fair value based on Level 2 observable market assumptions using standardized derivative pricing models. We estimate the fair value of our interest and rent receivables using Level 2 inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar receivables would be made to others with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of our mortgage loans and working capital loans are estimated by using Level 2 inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. We determine the fair value of our senior unsecured notes (excluding our 2006 Senior Unsecured Notes) using Level 2 inputs such as quotes from securities dealers and market makers. We estimate the fair value of our 2006 Senior Unsecured Notes, our revolving credit facility, and term loans using Level 2 inputs based on the present value of future payments, discounted at a rate which we consider appropriate for such debt.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, are subjective in nature, and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment. Settlement of such fair value amounts may not be possible and may not be a prudent management decision. The following table summarizes fair value estimates for our financial instruments (in thousands):

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Our equity interest in Ernest and related loans, which were acquired in 2012, are being measured at fair value on a recurring basis as we elected to account for these investments using the fair value option method. We have elected to account for these investments at fair value due to the size of the investments and because we believe this method is more reflective of current values. We have not made a similar election for other equity interests or loans made in or prior to 2015.

23

Table of Contents

At June 30, 2015, these amounts were as follows (in thousands):

Our mortgage loans with Ernest are recorded at fair value based on Level 3 inputs by discounting the estimated cash flows using the market rates which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and the same remaining maturities. Our acquisition loans and equity investments in Ernest are recorded at fair value based on Level 3 inputs, by using a discounted cash flow model, which requires significant estimates of our investee such as projected revenue and expenses and appropriate consideration of the underlying risk profile of the forecast assumptions associated with the investee. We classify these loans and equity investments as Level 3, as we use certain unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the fair value measurement, and the valuation requires management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices. For these cash flow models, our observable inputs include use of a capitalization rate, discount rate (which is based on a weighted-average cost of capital), and market interest rates, and our unobservable input includes an adjustment for a marketability discount (“DLOM”) on our equity investment of 40% at June 30, 2015.

In regards to the underlying projection of revenues and expenses used in the discounted cash flow model, such projections are provided by Ernest. However, we will modify such projections (including underlying assumptions used) as needed based on our review and analysis of Ernest’s historical results, meetings with key members of management, and our understanding of trends and developments within the healthcare industry.

In arriving at the DLOM, we started with a DLOM range based on the results of studies supporting valuation discounts for other transactions or structures without a public market. To select the appropriate DLOM within the range, we then considered many qualitative factors including the percent of control, the nature of the underlying investee’s business along with our rights as an investor pursuant to the operating agreement, the size of investment, expected holding period, number of shareholders, access to capital marketplace, etc. To illustrate the effect of movements in the DLOM, we performed a sensitivity analysis below by using basis point variations (dollars in thousands):

Because the fair value of Ernest investments noted above approximate their original cost, we did not recognize any unrealized gains/losses during the first half of 2015 or 2014.

24

Table of Contents

8. Earnings Per Share/Common Unit

Medical Properties Trust, Inc.

Our earnings per share were calculated based on the following (amounts in thousands):

25

Table of Contents

MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.

Our earnings per common unit were calculated based on the following (amounts in thousands):