Annual Statements Open main menu

Meridian Corp - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20429


FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

Or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                   to                  

Commission File Number: 000‑55983

Picture 1

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Pennsylvania

83-1561918

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

9 Old Lincoln Highway, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19335

(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

(484) 568‑5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

 

 

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, par value $1 per share

MRBK

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐Yes   ☒No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐Yes   ☒No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   ☐No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes   ☐No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

 

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Act). ☐Yes   ☒No

The approximate aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant is $99,618,818 as of June 30, 2019 based upon the last sales price in which our common stock was quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market on June 30, 2019.

As of March 30, 2020 there were 6,094,341 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 2019 in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

 

 

 

Table of Contents

MERIDIAN CORPORATION

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10‑K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

 

 

 

 

PART I

1

 

 

 

Item 1. 

Business

1

 

 

 

Item 1A. 

Risk Factors

16

 

 

 

Item 1B. 

Unresolved Staff Comments

34

 

 

 

Item 2. 

Properties

35

 

 

 

Item 3. 

Legal Proceedings

35

 

 

 

Item 4. 

Mine Safety Disclosures

35

 

 

 

 

PART II

36

 

 

 

Item 5. 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

36

 

 

 

Item 6. 

Selected Financial Data

37

 

 

 

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

38

 

 

 

Item 7A. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

50

 

 

 

Item 8. 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

53

 

 

 

Item 9. 

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

104

 

 

 

Item 9A. 

Controls and Procedures

104

 

 

 

Item 9B. 

Other Information

105

 

 

 

 

PART III

105

 

 

 

Item 10. 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

105

 

 

 

Item 11. 

Executive Compensation

105

 

 

 

Item 12. 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

105

 

 

 

Item 13. 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

105

 

 

 

Item 14. 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

105

 

 

 

 

PART IV

106

 

 

 

Item 15. 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

106

 

 

 

Item 16. 

Form 10-K Summary

107

 

 

 

ii

Table of Contents

PART I

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Meridian Corporation  (“Meridian,” or the “Corporation”) may from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements,” including statements contained in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (including this Annual Report on Form 10‑K and the exhibits thereto), in its reports to stockholders and in other communications by the Corporation, which are made in good faith by the Corporation pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (referred to as the “Exchange Act”) and the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These statements relate to future events or future predictions, including events or predictions relating to future financial performance, and are generally identifiable by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “plan,” “intend,” or “anticipate” or the negative thereof or comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements reflect numerous assumptions, estimates and forecasts as to future events. No assurance can be given that the assumptions, estimates and forecasts underlying such forward-looking statements will accurately reflect future conditions, or that any guidance, goals, targets or projected results will be realized. The assumptions, estimates and forecasts underlying such forward-looking statements involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, regulatory and financial market conditions and future business decisions, which may not be realized and which are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive and regulatory uncertainties and known and unknown risks, including the risks described under “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as such factors may be updated from time to time in our filings with the SEC, including our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Our actual results may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements.

 

These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of the Corporation’s plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions that are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which are beyond the Corporation’s control). The following factors, among others, could cause the Corporation’s financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Corporation conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; market volatility; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; the value of our products and services as perceived by actual and prospective customers, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors’ products and services; loss of management and key personnel; failure of our controls and procedures; inability to close loans in our pipeline; operational risks, including the risk of fraud by employees, customers or outsiders; our borrowers’ ability to repay their loans; changes in the real estate market that can affect real estate that serves as collateral for some of our loans; the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and our methodology for determining such allowance; the willingness of customers to substitute competitors’ products and services for the Corporation’s products and services; the impact of changes in applicable laws and regulations; changes in technology or interruptions and breaches in security of our information systems; the impact of any acquisitions; and the success of the Corporation at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

The Corporation cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. The Corporation does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Corporation, except as required by applicable law or regulation.

Throughout this document, references to “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Item 1. Business

General

Meridian is a bank holding company engaged in banking activities through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Meridian Bank (the “Bank”), a full-service, state-chartered commercial bank with offices in the Delaware Valley tri-state market, which

1

Table of Contents

includes Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.  We have a financial services business model with significant noninterest income streams from mortgage lending, small business (“SBA”) lending and wealth management services. We provide services to small and middle market businesses, professionals and retail customers throughout our market area. We have a modern, progressive, consultative approach to creating innovative solutions for our customers. We are technology driven, with a culture that incorporates significant use of customer preferred alternative delivery channels, such as mobile banking, remote deposit capture and bank-to-bank ACH. Our ‘Meridian everywhere’ philosophy of community presence, along with our strategic business footprint, allows us to provide the high degree of service, convenience and products our customers need to achieve their financial objectives.  We provide this service through three principal business line distribution channels, described further below.

Holding Company Formation

Meridian was incorporated on June 8, 2009, by and at the direction of the board of directors of the Bank for the sole purpose of acquiring the Bank and serving as the Bank’s parent bank holding company.  On August 24, 2018, the Corporation acquired the Bank in a merger and reorganization effected under Pennsylvania law and in accordance with the terms of a Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated April 26, 2018 (the “Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Agreement, on August 24, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. all of the outstanding shares of the Bank’s $1.00 par value common stock formerly held by its shareholders was converted into and exchanged for one newly issued share of the Corporation’s par value common stock, and the Bank became a subsidiary of the Corporation. Because the Bank and the Corporation were entities under common control, this exchange of shares between entities under common control resulted in the retrospective combination of the Bank and the Corporation for all periods presented as if the combination had been in effect since inception of common control.  As the Corporation had no assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses or operations prior to August 24, 2018, the historical financial statements of the Bank are the historical financial statements of the combined entity.  The Corporation is subject to supervision and examination by, and the regulations and reporting requirements of, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Corporate Structure and Business Lines

The Corporation is the parent to the Bank.  The Bank is the parent to three wholly-owned subsidiaries: Meridian Land Settlement Services, LLC, which provides title insurance services; Apex Realty, LLC, a real estate holding company; and Meridian Wealth Partners, LLC, a registered investment advisory firm, which we refer to as Meridian Wealth.  With these subsidiaries, the Corporation is organized into the following three lines of business.

Commercial Banking

The first line of business is our traditional banking operations, serving both commercial and consumer customers via deposits and cash management, commercial and industrial lending and leasing, commercial real estate lending, shared national credit participations, small business lending, consumer and home equity lending, private banking, merchant services, and title and land settlement services.

We have a strong credit culture that promotes diversity of lending products with a focus on commercial businesses.  We have no particular credit concentration.  Our commercial loans have been proactively managed in an effort to achieve a balanced portfolio with no unusual exposure to one industry.

Our commercial and industrial lending department supports our small business and middle market borrowers with a comprehensive selection of loan products including financing solutions for wholesalers, manufacturers, distributors, service providers, importers and exporters, among others.  Our portfolio includes business lines of credit, term loans, small business lending (“SBA”), lease financing and shared national credits (“SNCs”).

Our SBA team and their alliances with local economic development councils provide SBA and other financing options to help grow local businesses, create and retain jobs and stimulate our local economy.  In addition, Meridian understands that connections with the local professional industries benefit us, not only with these individuals as customers or investors, but also given the proven potential for business referrals.

2

Table of Contents

The commercial real estate division offers permanent/amortizing loans, owner-occupied commercial real estate loans and land development and construction loans for residential and commercial projects.  Our approach is to apply disciplined and integrated standards to underwriting, credit and portfolio management.  The extensive backgrounds of our commercial real estate lending team, not only in banking, but also directly in the builder/developer fields, bring a unique perspective and ability to communicate and consider all elements of a project and related risk from the clients’ viewpoint as well as ours.  

Mortgage Banking

The second line of business is mortgage banking. Our mortgage consultants guide our clients through the complex process of obtaining a loan to meet individual specific needs. Originations consist of consumer for-sale mortgage lending, loans to be held within our portfolio, and wholesale mortgage lending services. Clients include homeowners and smaller scale investors. The mortgage division operates and originates mortgage loans in the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and Maryland markets, most typically for 1‑4 family dwellings, with the intention of selling substantially all of these loans in the secondary market to qualified investors. Mortgages are originated through sales and marketing initiatives, as well as realtor, builder, bank, advertising and customer referral resources. The division’s main origination, processing, underwriting, closing and post-closing functions are performed at the Blue Bell mortgage headquarters with 9 other production/processing offices at December 31, 2019.

Wealth Management and Advisory Services

Meridian Wealth, a registered investment advisor and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, provides a comprehensive array of wealth management services and products and the trusted guidance to help its clients and our banking customers prepare for the future. Such clients include professionals, higher net worth individuals, companies seeking to provide benefits plans for their employees, and more. Acquiring and sustaining wealth is a gradual progression, one that requires a considerable amount of thought and planning. Our process takes a comprehensive approach to financial planning and encompasses all aspects of retirement, with an emphasis on sustainability. Meridian Wealth offers a significant enhancement to both our capacity and the variety of tools we can use to help bring effective financial planning and wealth management services to a broad segment of customers.

Market Area

Meridian is headquartered in Malvern and has six full-service branches. Its main branch, in Paoli, serves the Main Line. The West Chester and Media branches serve Chester and Delaware counties, respectively, while the Doylestown and Blue Bell branches serve Bucks and Montgomery counties, respectively. Our sixth branch is in Philadelphia. These branches provide “Relationship Hubs” for our regional lending groups and allow Meridian to proceed in its plan for serving markets in each of the central (at or near the county seat) townships of the counties in and surrounding Philadelphia. In addition to our deposit taking branches, there are currently 11 other locations, including headquarters for Corporate, the Wealth Division and the Mortgage Division.

Demographic information for the five county Philadelphia metropolitan area shows our primary market to be stable, with moderate population growth. According to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5‑Year Estimates, approximately 25% of the population is between the ages of 25‑44. The median home value, outside of Philadelphia, is $335 thousand according to data gathered from the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency (PHFA). Median incomes for Chester, Montgomery and Bucks counties are in the top 70 wealthiest counties in the nation according to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5‑Year Estimates.

Competition

Overall, the banking business in the Delaware Valley is highly competitive.  Meridian Bank faces substantial competition both in attracting deposits and in originating loans.  Meridian Bank competes with local, regional and national commercial banks, savings banks, and savings and loan associations.  Other competitors include money market mutual funds, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, stock brokerage firms, regulated small loan companies, credit unions, and issuers of commercial paper and other securities.

3

Table of Contents

Meridian Bank seeks to compete for business principally on the basis of high quality, personal service to customers, customer access to our decision-makers, and customer preferred electronic delivery channels while providing an attractive banking platform and competitive interest rates and fees.

Our Current Capital Stock Structure

As of December 31, 2019 Meridian had 6,407,685 shares of common stock, $1 par value, issued and outstanding. There is no preferred stock outstanding.

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

As a company with less than $1.0 billion in revenues during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”). An emerging growth company may take advantage of reduced reporting requirements and is relieved of certain other significant requirements that are otherwise generally applicable to public companies. As an emerging growth company,

·

we may present only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations;

·

we are exempt from the requirement to obtain an audit of our internal control over financial reporting under the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002;

·

we are permitted to provide less extensive disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements; and

·

we are not required to give our shareholders non‑binding advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements.

We have elected to take advantage of the scaled disclosure requirements and other relief described above and may take advantage of these exemptions for so long as we remain an emerging growth company.  We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the end of the fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of $1,070,000,000 or more, (ii) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three‑year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non‑convertible debt and (iv) the end of the fiscal year in which the market value of our equity securities that are held by non‑affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 of that year.

In addition to scaled disclosure and the other relief described above, the JOBS Act permits us an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards affecting public companies.  We have elected to take advantage of this extended transition period, which means that the financial statements included herein, as well as any financial statements that we file in the future, will not be subject to all new or revised accounting standards generally applicable to public companies for the transition period for so long as we remain an emerging growth company or until we affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period under the JOBS Act.  If we do so, we will prominently disclose this decision in the first periodic report following our decision, and such decision is irrevocable.

Information about Meridian

Our executive offices are located at 9 Old Lincoln Highway, Malvern, PA 19355 and our telephone number is (484) 568‑5000. Our Internet website is www.meridianbanker.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q and Current Reports on Form 8‑K, and all amendments thereto, from November 7, 2017 through August 18, 2018 have been filed with the FDIC. Since August 19, 2018, all reports on Form 8-K, and Form 10-Q along with this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been filed with the SEC.  Also on our website are our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Charters. The information contained in our website or in any websites linked by our website, is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.  The Corporation’s filings with the SEC can also be accessed at the SEC’s internet website:  http://www.sec.gov.  

4

Table of Contents

Investors can obtain copies of Meridian’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, on Meridian’s website (accessible under “Investor Relations” – “SEC Filings”) as soon as reasonably practicable after Meridian has filed such materials with, or furnished them to, the SEC.  Meridian will also furnish a paper copy of such filings free of charge upon request.

We also file reports of our condition and income, known as “Call Reports,” with the FDIC and the Parent Company Only Financial Statement for Small Holding Companies known as the “FR Y-9SP” with the Federal Reserve. These reports are available on the FFIEC Central Data Repository’s Public Data Distribution website at cdr.ffiec.gov/public.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

Meridian and its subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation under federal and state banking laws that establish a comprehensive framework for our operations. This framework may materially affect our growth potential and financial performance and is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, customers, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not for the protection of our shareholders and creditors. Significant elements of the statutes, regulations and policies applicable to us and our subsidiaries are described below.

The Bank is an FDIC-insured commercial bank chartered under the laws of Pennsylvania with regulatory oversight from the FDIC and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities (“PDBS”).    Following the formation of the holding company, the Corporation is now also subject to supervision and examination by, and the regulations and reporting requirements of, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and is subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Exchange Act. In order to adhere to regulatory expectations on an ongoing basis and to successfully prepare for the normal examination processes, Meridian maintains numerous internal controls including policies and programs appropriate to maintain the Bank’s safety and soundness, under such key areas as lending, compliance, BSA-AML, information security, human resources, deposit and cash management products, enterprise risk, merchant services, finance, title services, branch security and wealth management.

Permissible Activities for Bank Holding Companies

The Corporation is a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“BHC Act”).  In general, the BHC Act limits the business of bank holding companies to banking, managing or controlling banks and other activities that the Federal Reserve has determined to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto, which include certain activities relating to extending credit or acting as an investment or financial advisor.

Bank holding companies that qualify and elect to be treated as “financial holding companies” may engage in a broader range of additional activities than bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies. In particular, financial holding companies may engage in activities that are (i) financial in nature or incidental to such financial activities or (ii) complementary to a financial activity and do not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. These activities include securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments. We have not elected to be treated as a financial holding company and currently have no plans to make a financial holding company election.

The Federal Reserve has the power to order any bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary when the Federal Reserve has reasonable grounds to believe that continuing such activity, ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness, safety or stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company.

Permissible Activities for Banks

As a Pennsylvania-chartered commercial bank, our business is subject to extensive supervision and regulation by state and federal bank regulatory agencies. Our business is generally limited to activities permitted by Pennsylvania law and any applicable federal laws. Under the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965 (the “Pennsylvania Banking Code”), the Bank may generally engage in all usual banking activities, including, among other things, accepting deposits; lending money on

5

Table of Contents

personal and real estate security; issuing letters of credit; buying, discounting, and negotiating promissory notes and other forms of indebtedness; buying and selling foreign currency and, subject to certain limitations, certain investment securities; engaging in certain insurance activities and maintaining safe deposit boxes on premises.

The FDIC has adopted regulations pertaining to the other activity restrictions imposed upon insured state banks and their subsidiaries. Pursuant to such regulations, insured state banks engaging in impermissible activities may seek approval from the FDIC to continue such activities. State banks not engaging in such activities but that desire to engage in otherwise impermissible activities either directly or through a subsidiary may apply for approval from the FDIC to do so; however, if such bank fails to meet the minimum capital requirements or the activities present a significant risk to the Deposit Insurance Fund, such application will not be approved by the FDIC. Pursuant to this authority, the FDIC has determined that investments in certain majority-owned subsidiaries of insured state banks do not represent a significant risk to the deposit insurance funds. Investments permitted under that authority include real estate activities and securities activities.

Meridian currently conducts certain non-banking activities through certain of the Bank’s non-bank subsidiaries. Meridian Bank currently operates three wholly-owned subsidiaries: Meridian Land Settlement Services, which provides title insurance services; Apex Realty, a real estate holding company; and Meridian Wealth, a registered investment advisory firm.

Pennsylvania law also imposes restrictions on Meridian Bank’s activities intended to ensure the safety and soundness of the Bank. For example, Meridian Bank is restricted under the Pennsylvania Banking Code from investing in certain types of investment securities and is generally limited in the amount of money it can lend to a single borrower or invest in securities issued by a single issuer.

Acquisitions by Bank Holding Companies

Control Acquisitions.  The Change in Bank Control Act (“CBCA”) prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring “control” of a bank holding company unless the Federal Reserve has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the Federal Reserve, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such as Customers Bancorp, would, under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute acquisition of control of Customers Bancorp.

In addition, the CBCA prohibits any entity from acquiring 25% (the BHC Act has a lower limit for acquirers that are existing bank holding companies) or more of a bank holding company’s or bank’s voting securities, or otherwise obtaining control or a controlling influence over a bank holding company or bank without the approval of the Federal Reserve. On January 31, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board approved the issuance of a final rule (which becomes effective April 1, 2020) that clarifies and codifies the Federal Reserve’s standards for determining whether one company has control over another. The final rule establishes four categories of tiered presumptions of noncontrol that are based on the percentage of voting shares held by the investor (less than 5%, 5-9.9%, 10-14.9% and 15-24.9%) and the presence of other indicia of control. As the percentage of ownership increases, fewer indicia of control are permitted without falling outside of the presumption of noncontrol. These indicia of control include nonvoting equity ownership, director representation, management interlocks, business relationship and restrictive contractual covenants. Under the final rule, investors can hold up to 24.9% of the voting securities and up to 33% of the total equity of a company without necessarily having a controlling influence.

Dividends

Meridian is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank and the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Bank. As a Pennsylvania banking institution, the Bank is subject to certain restrictions on its ability to pay dividends under applicable banking laws and regulations.

Federal banking regulators are authorized to determine under certain circumstances relating to the financial condition of a bank holding company or a bank that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice and to prohibit payment thereof. In particular, federal banking regulators have stated that paying dividends that deplete a banking organization’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice and that banking

6

Table of Contents

organizations should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In addition, in the current financial and economic environment, the federal banking regulators have indicated that banks should carefully review their dividend policy and have discouraged payment ratios that are at maximum allowable levels unless both asset quality and capital are very strong. Under the Capital Rules, institutions that seek to pay dividends must maintain 2.5% in Common Equity Tier 1 capital attributable to the capital conservation buffer, which is to be phased in over a three-year period that began on January 1, 2016. See “—Regulatory Capital Requirements”.

Our principal source of cash flow and income is dividends from our subsidiaries, which is also the component of our liquidity. In addition to the restrictions discussed above, the Bank is subject to limitations under Pennsylvania law regarding the level of dividends that it may pay to our shareholders. Under the Pennsylvania Banking Code, the Bank generally may not pay dividends in excess of its net profits.

On May 24, 2018 the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (“EGRRCPA”), amended certain aspects of the company-run stress testing requirement in section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”).  These updated rules require bank holding companies and banks with average total consolidated assets greater than $250 billion to conduct a periodic company-run stress test of capital, consolidated earnings and losses under one base and two stress scenarios provided by the federal banking regulators. We are not currently subject to the stress testing requirements, but we expect that if we become subject to those requirements, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the PDBS will consider our results as an important factor in evaluating our capital adequacy, any proposed acquisitions by us or by the holding company and whether any proposed dividends or stock repurchases by us or by the holding company may be an unsafe or unsound practice.

Parity Regulation

A Pennsylvania banking institution may, in accordance with Pennsylvania law and regulations issued by the PDBS, exercise any power and engage in any activity that has been authorized for national banks, federal thrifts or state banks in a state other than Pennsylvania, provided that the activity is permissible under applicable federal law and not specifically prohibited by Pennsylvania law. Such powers and activities must be subject to the same limitations and restrictions imposed on the national bank, federal thrift or out-of-state bank that exercised the power or activity, subject to a required notice to the PDBS. The FDIA, however, prohibits state-chartered banks from making new investments, loans, or becoming involved in activities as principal and equity investments which are not permitted for national banks unless (1) the FDIC determines the activity or investment does not pose a significant risk of loss to the Deposit Insurance Fund and (2) the Bank meets all applicable capital requirements. Accordingly, the additional operating authority provided to the Bank by the Pennsylvania Banking Code is restricted by the FDIA.

Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders

Transactions between our subsidiaries, or between the Corporation and our subsidiaries,  are regulated under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. The Federal Reserve Act imposes quantitative and qualitative requirements and collateral requirements on covered transactions by the Bank with, or for the benefit of, its affiliates. Generally, the Federal Reserve Act limits the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of a bank’s capital stock and surplus, limits the aggregate amount of all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital stock and surplus, and requires those transactions to be on terms at least as favorable to a bank as if the transaction were conducted with an unaffiliated third party. Covered transactions are defined by statute to include a loan or extension of credit, as well as a purchase of securities issued by an affiliate, a purchase of assets (unless otherwise exempted by the Federal Reserve) from the affiliate, certain derivative transactions with an affiliate, the acceptance of securities issued by the affiliate as collateral for a loan, and the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate. In addition, any credit transactions with any affiliate, must be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral.

Federal law also limits a bank’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons. Among other things, extensions of credit to insiders are required to be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons. Also, the terms of such extensions of credit may not

7

Table of Contents

involve more than the normal risk of non-repayment or present other unfavorable features and may not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons individually and in the aggregate.

Source of Strength

Federal Reserve policy and federal law require bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary banks. Under this requirement, the holding company, is expected to commit resources to support the Bank, including at times when it may not be in a financial position to provide such resources, and it may not be in our, or our shareholders’ or creditors’, best interests to do so. In addition, any capital loans the holding company makes to the Bank are subordinate in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of the Bank. In the event of our bankruptcy, any commitment by us to a federal banking regulatory agency to maintain the capital of the Bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.

Regulatory Capital Requirements

The Federal Reserve monitors the capital adequacy of the holding company on a consolidated basis, and the FDIC and the PDBS monitor the capital adequacy of the Bank. The banking regulators use a combination of risk-based guidelines and a leverage ratio to evaluate capital adequacy. The risk-based capital guidelines applicable to us are based on the Basel Committee’s  December 2010 final capital framework, known as Basel III, as implemented by the federal banking regulators. The risk-based guidelines are intended to make regulatory capital requirements sensitive to differences in credit and market risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies, to account for off-balance sheet exposure and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets.

Basel III and the Capital Rules. In July 2013, the federal banking regulators approved final rules, or the Capital Rules, implementing the Basel Committee’s  December 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards, known as Basel III, and various provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and banks, including us, compared to the previous risk-based capital rules. The Capital Rules revise the components of capital and address other issues affecting the numerator in regulatory capital ratio calculations. The Capital Rules, among other things, (i) include a new capital measure called “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”), (ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting certain revised requirements, (iii) define CET1 narrowly by requiring that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital, and (iv) expand the scope of the deductions/adjustments to capital as compared to prior regulations. The Capital Rules also address risk weights and other issues affecting the denominator in regulatory capital ratio calculations, including replacing the existing risk-weighting approach derived from Basel I with a more risk-sensitive approach based, in part, on the standardized approach adopted by the Basel Committee in its 2004 capital accords, known as Basel II. The Capital Rules also implement the requirements of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act to remove references to credit ratings from the federal banking regulators’ rules. Subject to a phase-in period for various provisions, the Capital Rules became effective for us beginning on January 1, 2015.

Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the minimum capital ratios are (i) 4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets, (ii) 6% Tier 1 capital (that is, CET1 plus Additional Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets, (iii) 8% total capital (that is, Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets and (iv) 4% Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements (known as the “leverage ratio”).

The current Capital Rules also include a capital conservation buffer designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. The capital conservation buffer is composed entirely of CET1, on top of these minimum risk-weighted asset ratios. The implementation of the capital conservation buffer began on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and was phased in over a three-year period (increasing by 0.625% on each subsequent January 1) until it reached 2.5% on January 1, 2019. In addition, the Capital Rules provide for a countercyclical capital buffer applicable only to certain covered institutions. We do not expect the countercyclical capital buffer to be applicable to us. Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the capital conservation buffer (or below the combined capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer, when the latter is applied) will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.

8

Table of Contents

When fully phased-in, the Capital Rules will require us to maintain an additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of CET1, effectively resulting in minimum ratios of (i) 7% CET1 to risk-weighted assets, (ii) 8.5% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, (iii) 10.5% total capital to risk-weighted assets and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4%. The Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, certain deferred tax assets and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to CET1 began on January 1, 2015 and will be phased in over a four-year period (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015 and an additional 20% per year thereafter).

In addition, under the general risk-based Capital Rules, the effects of accumulated other comprehensive income items included in capital were excluded for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios. Under the Capital Rules, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive income items are not excluded; however, non-advanced approaches banking organizations, including the Bank, were able to make a one-time permanent election to continue to exclude these items. The Bank made this election.

The Capital Rules also prescribed a new standardized approach for risk weightings that expanded the risk-weighting categories from the current four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0%, for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600%, for certain equity exposures, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories.

With respect to the Bank, the Capital Rules also revised the prompt corrective action regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA. See “—Prompt Corrective Action Framework”.

Liquidity Regulations

Historically, the regulation and monitoring of bank and bank holding company liquidity has been addressed as a supervisory matter, without required formulaic measures. The Basel III final framework requires banks and bank holding companies to measure their liquidity against specific liquidity tests that, although similar in some respects to liquidity measures historically applied by banks and regulators for management and supervisory purposes, going forward would be required by regulation. One test, referred to as the liquidity coverage ratio, or LCR, is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a 30‑day time horizon (or, if greater, 25% of its expected total cash outflow) under an acute liquidity stress scenario. The other test, referred to as the net stable funding ratio, or NSFR, is designed to promote more medium- and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banking entities over a one-year time horizon. These requirements will incentivize banking entities to increase their holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and other sovereign debt as a component of assets and increase the use of long-term debt as a funding source.

Prompt Corrective Action Framework

The FDIA also requires the federal banking regulators to take prompt corrective action in respect of depository institutions that fail to meet specified capital requirements. The FDIA establishes five capital categories (“well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized”), and the federal banking regulators are required to take certain mandatory supervisory actions, and are authorized to take other discretionary actions, with respect to institutions that are undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized. The severity of these mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions depends upon the capital category in which the institution is placed. The relevant capital measures, which reflect changes under the Capital Rules that became effective on January 1, 2015, are the total capital ratio, the CET1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the leverage ratio.

A bank will be (i) “well capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a CET1 capital ratio of 6.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater, and is not subject to any order or written directive by any such regulatory authority to meet and maintain a specific capital level for

9

Table of Contents

any capital measure.  A bank’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the Bank’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.

An undercapitalized institution is required to file a written capital restoration plan, along with a performance guaranty by its holding company or a third party. In addition, an undercapitalized institution becomes subject to certain automatic restrictions including a prohibition on the payment of dividends, a limitation on asset growth and expansion, and in certain cases, a limitation on the payment of bonuses or raises to senior executive officers, and a prohibition on the payment of certain “management fees” to any “controlling person”. Institutions that are classified as undercapitalized are also subject to certain additional supervisory actions, including increased reporting burdens and regulatory monitoring, a limitation on the institution’s ability to make acquisitions, open new branch offices, or engage in new lines of business, obligations to raise additional capital, restrictions on transactions with affiliates, and restrictions on interest rates paid by the institution on deposits. In certain cases, bank regulatory agencies may require replacement of senior executive officers or directors, or sale of the institution to a willing purchaser. If an institution is deemed to be “critically undercapitalized” and continues in that category for four quarters, the statute requires, with certain narrowly limited exceptions, that the institution be placed in receivership. The Bank is currently regarded as “well capitalized” for regulatory capital purposes. See Note 19, “Regulatory Capital Requirements,” in the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the Bank’s and the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios.

Safety and Soundness Standards

The FDIA requires the federal banking agencies to prescribe standards, by regulations or guidelines, relating to internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings, stock valuation and compensation, fees and benefits, and such other operational and managerial standards as the agencies deem appropriate. The federal banking agencies have adopted the Interagency Guidelines for Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness. The guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, these guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risk and exposures specified in the guidelines. These guidelines also prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the agencies adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, an agency to order an institution that has been given notice by an agency that it is not satisfying all safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If, after being so notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails in any material respect to implement an acceptable compliance plan, the banking regulator must issue an order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an undercapitalized institution may be subject under the FDIA. See “—Prompt Corrective Action Framework”. If an institution fails to comply with such an order, the banking regulator may seek to enforce such order in judicial proceedings and to impose civil money penalties.

Deposit Insurance

FDIC insurance assessments

As an FDIC-insured bank, the Bank must pay deposit insurance assessments to the FDIC based on its average total assets minus its average tangible equity. Deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC and such insurance is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government.

As an institution with less than $10 billion in assets, the Bank’s assessment rates are based on the level of risk it poses to the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund (“DIF”). Pursuant to changes adopted by the FDIC that were effective July 1, 2016, the initial base rate for deposit insurance is between three and 30 basis points. Total base assessment after possible adjustments now ranges between 1.5 and 40 basis points. For established smaller institutions, like the Bank, supervisory ratings are used along with (i) an initial base assessment rate, (ii) an unsecured debt adjustment (which can be positive or negative), and (iii) a brokered deposit adjustment, to calculate a total base assessment rate.

10

Table of Contents

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the limit on FDIC deposit insurance was increased to $250 thousand. The coverage limit is per depositor, per insured depository institution for each account ownership category. The Dodd-Frank Act also set a new minimum DIF reserve ratio at 1.35% of estimated insured deposits. In October 2010, the FDIC adopted a new DIF restoration plan to ensure that the fund reserve ratio reaches 1.35% by September 30, 2020, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. In December 2018, the FDIC announced that the DIF reserve ratio had surpassed this benchmark.

Under the FDIA, the FDIC may terminate deposit insurance upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

Other assessments

In addition, the Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 authorized the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) to impose assessments on certain deposits in order to service the interest on the FICO’s bond obligations from deposit insurance fund assessments. The amount assessed on individual institutions is in addition to the amount, if any, paid for deposit insurance according to the FDIC’s risk-related assessment rate schedules. Assessment rates may be adjusted quarterly to reflect changes in the assessment base.

The Volcker Rule

The Dodd-Frank Act, pursuant to a statutory provision commonly called the “Volcker Rule”, prohibits banks and their affiliates from engaging in proprietary trading and investing in and sponsoring hedge funds and private equity funds. The Volcker Rule, which became effective in July 2015, does not significantly affect the operations of Meridian and its subsidiaries, as we do not have any significant engagement in the businesses prohibited by the Volcker Rule.

Depositor Preference

The FDIA provides that, in the event of the “liquidation or other resolution” of an insured depository institution, the claims of deposits of the institution, including the claims of the FDIC as subrogate of insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver, will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution. If an insured depository institution fails, insured and uninsured depositors, along with the FDIC, will have priority in payment ahead of unsecured, non-deposit creditors, including depositors whose deposits are payable only outside of the United States and the parent bank holding company, with respect to any extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository institution.

Interstate Branching

Pennsylvania banking laws authorize banks in Pennsylvania to acquire existing branches or branch de novo in other states, and also permits out-of-state banks to acquire existing branches or branch de novo in Pennsylvania.

In April 2008, state banking regulators in the states of New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “Interstate MOU”) to clarify their respective roles, as home and host state regulators, regarding interstate branching activity on a regional basis pursuant to the Riegle-Neal Amendments Act of 1997. The Interstate MOU establishes the regulatory responsibilities of the respective state banking regulators regarding bank regulatory examinations and is intended to reduce the regulatory burden on state-chartered banks branching within the region by eliminating duplicative host state compliance exams.

Under the Interstate MOU, the activities of any branches Meridian would establish in New Jersey or New York would be governed by Pennsylvania state law to the same extent that federal law governs the activities of the branch of an out-of-state national bank in such host states. Issues regarding whether a particular host state law is preempted are to be determined in the first instance by the PDBS. In the event that the PDBS and the applicable host state regulator disagree regarding whether a particular host state law is pre-empted, the PDBS and the applicable host state regulator would use their reasonable best efforts to consider all points of view and to resolve the disagreement.

11

Table of Contents

Federal law permits state and national banks to merge with banks in other states subject to: (i) regulatory approval; (ii) federal and state deposit concentration limits; and (iii) any state law limitations requiring the merging bank to have been in existence for a minimum period of time (not to exceed five years) prior to the merger. The establishment of new interstate branches or the acquisition of individual branches of a bank in another state (rather than the acquisition of an out-of-state bank in its entirety) has historically been permitted only in those states the laws of which expressly authorize such expansion. However, the Dodd-Frank Act permits well-capitalized and well-managed banks to establish new branches across state lines without these impediments.

Consumer Financial Protection

We are subject to a number of federal and state consumer protection laws that extensively govern our relationship with our customers. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Service Members Civil Relief Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, Telephone Consumer Protection Act, CAN-SPAM Act, and these laws’ respective state-law counterparts, as well as state usury laws and laws regarding unfair and deceptive acts and practices. These and other federal laws, among other things, require disclosures of the cost of credit and terms of deposit accounts, provide substantive consumer rights, prohibit discrimination in credit transactions, regulate the use of credit report information, provide financial privacy protections, restrict our ability to raise interest rates on extensions of credit and subject us to substantial regulatory oversight. Violations of applicable consumer protection laws can result in significant potential liability from litigation brought by customers, including actual damages, restitution and attorneys’ fees. Federal banking regulators, state attorneys general and state and local consumer protection agencies may also seek to enforce consumer protection requirements and obtain these and other remedies, including regulatory sanctions, customer rescission rights, action by the state and local attorneys general in each jurisdiction in which we operate and civil money penalties. Failure to comply with consumer protection requirements may also result in our failure to obtain any required bank regulatory approval for merger or acquisition transactions we may wish to pursue or our prohibition from engaging in such transactions even if approval is not required.

The Dodd-Frank Act created a new, independent federal agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which was granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws with respect to certain consumer financial products and services, including the ability to require reimbursements and other payments to customers for alleged legal violations. The CFPB has the authority to impose significant penalties, as well as injunctive relief that prohibits lenders from engaging in allegedly unlawful practices. The CFPB is also authorized to engage in consumer financial education, track consumer complaints, request data and promote the availability of financial services to underserved consumers and communities.  Although all institutions are subject to rules adopted by the CFPB and examination by the CFPB in conjunction with examinations by the institution’s primary federal regulator, the CFPB has primary examination and enforcement authority over institutions with assets of $10 billion or more. The FDIC has primary responsibility for examination of the Bank and enforcement with respect to various federal consumer protection laws so long as the Bank has total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion, and state authorities are responsible for monitoring our compliance with all state consumer laws. The CFPB also has the authority to require reports from institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, such as the Bank, to support the CFPB in implementing federal consumer protection laws, supporting examination activities, and assessing and detecting risks to consumers and financial markets.

The consumer protection provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the examination, supervision and enforcement of those laws and implementing regulations by the CFPB have created a more intense and complex environment for consumer finance regulation. The CFPB has significant authority to implement and enforce federal consumer finance laws, including the TILA, the ECOA and new requirements for financial services products provided for in the Dodd-Frank Act.

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer financial laws that apply to all banks including, among other things, the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” acts and practices. Abusive acts or practices are defined in the Dodd-Frank Act as those that (1) materially interfere with a consumer’s ability to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or service, or (2) take unreasonable advantage of a consumer’s  (a) lack of financial savvy, (b) inability to protect herself or himself in the selection or use of consumer financial products or services,

12

Table of Contents

or (c) reasonable reliance on a covered entity to act in the consumer’s interests. The review of products and practices to prevent such acts and practices is a continuing focus of the CFPB, and of banking regulators more broadly. The ultimate impact of this heightened scrutiny is uncertain but it could result in changes to pricing, practices, products and procedures. It could also result in increased costs related to regulatory oversight, supervision and examination, additional remediation efforts and possible penalties. The Dodd-Frank Act does not prevent states from adopting stricter consumer protection standards. State regulation of financial products and potential enforcement actions could also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Federal Home Loan Bank Membership

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”), which serves as a central credit facility for its members. The FHLB is funded primarily from proceeds from the sale of obligations of the FHLB system. It makes loans to member banks in the form of FHLB advances. All advances from the FHLB are required to be fully collateralized as determined by the FHLB.

Ability-To-Pay Rules and Qualified Mortgages

As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB issued a series of final rules in January 2013 amending Regulation Z, implementing TILA, which requires mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination, based on verified and documented information, that a consumer applying for a residential mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms. These final rules prohibit creditors, such as the Bank, from extending residential mortgage loans without regard for the consumer’s ability to repay and add restrictions and requirements to residential mortgage origination and servicing practices. In addition, these rules restrict the imposition of prepayment penalties and restrict compensation practices relating to residential mortgage loan origination. Mortgage lenders are required to determine consumers’ ability to repay in one of two ways. The first alternative requires the mortgage lender to consider eight underwriting factors when making the credit decision. Alternatively, the mortgage lender can originate “qualified mortgages”, which are entitled to a presumption that the creditor making the loan satisfied the ability-to-repay requirements. In general, a qualified mortgage is a residential mortgage loan that does not have certain high risk features, such as negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or a term exceeding 30 years. In addition, to be a qualified mortgage, the points and fees paid by a consumer cannot exceed 3% of the total loan amount and the borrower’s total debt-to-income ratio must be no higher than 43% (subject to certain limited exceptions for loans eligible for purchase, guarantee or insurance by a government sponsored enterprise or a federal agency).

Commercial Real Estate Guidance

In December 2015, the federal banking regulators released a statement entitled “Interagency Statement on Prudent Risk Management for Commercial Real Estate Lending” (the “CRE Guidance”). In the CRE Guidance, the federal banking regulators (i) expressed concerns with institutions that ease commercial real estate underwriting standards, (ii) directed financial institutions to maintain underwriting discipline and exercise risk management practices to identify, measure and monitor lending risks, and (iii) indicated that they will continue to pay special attention to commercial real estate lending activities and concentrations going forward. The federal banking regulators previously issued guidance in December 2006, entitled “Interagency Guidance on Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices”, which stated that an institution is potentially exposed to significant commercial real estate concentration risk, and should employ enhanced risk management practices, where (1) total commercial real estate loans represent 300% or more of its total capital and (2) the outstanding balance of such institution’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the prior 36 months.

Leveraged Lending Guidance

In March 2013, the federal banking regulators jointly issued guidance on leveraged lending that updates and replaces the guidance for leveraged finance activities issued by the federal banking regulators in April 2001. The revised leveraged lending guidance describes regulatory expectations for the sound risk management of leveraged lending activities, including the importance for institutions to maintain, among other things, (i) a credit limit and concentration framework

13

Table of Contents

consistent with the institution’s risk appetite, (ii) underwriting standards that define acceptable leverage levels, (iii) strong pipeline management policies and procedures and (iv) guidelines for conducting periodic portfolio and pipeline stress tests.

Community Reinvestment Act of 1977

Under the CRA, the Bank has an obligation, consistent with safe and sound operations, to help meet the credit needs of the market areas where it operates, which includes providing credit to low- and moderate-income individuals and communities. In connection with its examination of the Bank, the FDIC is required to assess our compliance with the CRA. Our bank’s failure to comply with the CRA could, among other things, result in the denial or delay in certain corporate applications filed by us, including applications for branch openings or relocations and applications to acquire, merge or consolidate with another banking institution or holding company. Our bank received a rating of “Satisfactory” in its most recently completed CRA examination in 2016 that was as of November 8, 2016.

Financial Privacy

The federal banking regulators have adopted rules limiting the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to unaffiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to an unaffiliated third party. These regulations affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors.

Anti-Money Laundering and the USA PATRIOT ACT

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which was enacted in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, includes provisions designed to combat international money laundering and advance the U.S. government’s war against terrorism. The USA PATRIOT Act and the regulations which implement it contain many obligations which must be satisfied by financial institutions, including the Bank. Those regulations impose obligations on financial institutions, such as the Bank, to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identity of their customers. The failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the financial institution.

Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions against targeted foreign countries and regimes, under authority of various laws, including designated foreign countries, nationals and others. OFAC publishes lists of specially designated targets and countries. We are responsible for, among other things, blocking accounts of, and transactions with, such targets and countries, prohibiting unlicensed trade and financial transactions with them and reporting blocked transactions after their occurrence. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences and could result in civil money penalties imposed on the institution by OFAC. Failure to comply with these sanctions could also cause applicable bank regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions when regulatory approval is required or to prohibit such transactions even if approval is not required.

Incentive Compensation

The Federal Reserve will review, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as us, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews will be tailored to each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk management control or governance processes,

14

Table of Contents

pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies.

In June 2010, the federal banking regulators issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The guidance, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should (1) provide incentives that appropriately balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage employees to expose their organizations to imprudent risk, (2) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management and (3) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization ‘s board of directors.

During the second quarter of 2016, certain U.S. regulators, including the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the SEC, proposed revised rules on incentive-based payment arrangements at specified regulated entities having at least $1 billion in total assets (which would not include the Bank). The proposed revised rules would establish general qualitative requirements applicable to all covered entities, which would include: (i) prohibiting incentive arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by providing excessive compensation; (ii) prohibiting incentive arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks that could lead to a material financial loss; (iii) establishing requirements for performance measures to appropriately balance risk and reward; (iv) requiring board of director oversight of incentive arrangements; and (v) mandating appropriate record-keeping.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the stock exchanges and approved by the SEC in January 2013 under the Dodd-Frank Act, public company compensation committee members must meet heightened independence requirements and consider the independence of compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors to the compensation committee. A compensation committee must have the authority to hire advisors and to have the public company fund reasonable compensation of such advisors.

Public companies will be required, once stock exchanges impose additional listing requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act, to implement “clawback” procedures for incentive compensation payments and to disclose the details of the procedures which allow recovery of incentive compensation that was paid on the basis of erroneous financial information necessitating a restatement due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements.  This clawback policy is intended to apply to compensation paid within a three-year look-back window of the restatement and would cover all executives who received incentive awards.

Cybersecurity

In March 2015, federal regulators issued two related statements regarding cybersecurity. One statement indicates that financial institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and to ensure that their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate customers accessing internet-based services of the financial institution. The other statement indicates that a financial institution’s management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution’s operations after a cyberattack involving destructive malware. A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyberattack. If we fail to observe the regulatory guidance, we could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties.

In the ordinary course of business, we rely on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our operations and to store sensitive data. We employ an in-depth, layered, defensive approach that leverages people, processes and technology to manage and maintain cybersecurity controls. We employ a variety of preventative and detective tools to monitor, block, and provide alerts regarding suspicious activity, as well as to report on any suspected advanced persistent threats. Notwithstanding the strength of our defensive measures, the threat from cyberattacks is severe, attacks are sophisticated and increasing in volume, and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures. While to date, we

15

Table of Contents

have not experienced a significant compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, our systems and those of our customers and third party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that we could experience a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by us and our customers.

Future Legislation and Regulation

Congress may enact legislation from time to time that affects the regulation of the financial services industry, and state legislatures may enact legislation from time to time affecting the regulation of financial institutions chartered by or operating in those states. Federal and state regulatory agencies also periodically propose and adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. The substance or impact of pending or future legislation or regulation, or the application thereof, cannot be predicted, although enactment of the proposed legislation could affect the regulatory structure under which we operate and may significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal business processes, require us to increase our regulatory capital or modify our business strategy, or limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner. Our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects may be adversely affected, perhaps materially, as a result.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves a significant degree of risk.  The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect us are described below.  Before investing in our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, in addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report.  Any of the following risks, as well as risks that we do not know or currently deem immaterial, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.  As a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose some or all of your investment.  Further, to the extent that any of the information in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K constitutes forward‑looking statements, the risk factors below are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward‑looking statements made by us or on our behalf.  See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward‑Looking Statements”.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our business and operations may be materially adversely affected by national and local market economic conditions.  

Our business and operations, which primarily consist of banking and wealth management activities, including lending money to customers in the form of loans and borrowing money from customers in the form of deposits, are sensitive to general business and economic conditions in the United States generally, and in our local markets in particular. If economic conditions in the United States or any of our local markets weaken, our growth and profitability from our operations could be constrained. The current economic environment is characterized by interest rates near historically low levels, which impacts our ability to attract deposits and to generate attractive earnings through our loan and investment portfolios. All of these factors can individually or in the aggregate be detrimental to our business, and the interplay between these factors can be complex and unpredictable. Unfavorable market conditions can result in a deterioration in the credit quality of our borrowers and the demand for our products and services, an increase in the number of delinquencies, defaults and charge-offs, additional provisions for loan losses, a decline in the value of our collateral, and an overall material adverse effect on the quality of our loan portfolio. 

The economic conditions in our local markets may be different from the economic conditions in the United States as a whole. Our success depends to a certain extent on the general economic conditions of the geographic markets that we serve in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware. Local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on our commercial, real estate and construction loans, the ability of borrowers to repay these loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans. Adverse changes in the economic conditions of the northeastern United States in general or any one or more of these local markets could negatively impact the financial results of our banking operations and have a negative effect on our profitability.

16

Table of Contents

In addition, the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is causing worldwide concern and economic disruption. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has advised that coronavirus may spread significantly in the United States. There have been numerous reports of the outbreak disrupting or restricting supply chains, resulting in closures of facilities and reductions in demand across companies in a variety of industries. It is also possible that the spread of the coronavirus may have direct effects on our operations, such as limiting employee travel or increasing telecommuting arrangements.  In addition, recent developments and reports relating to the coronavirus have coincided with heightened volatility in financial markets in the United States and worldwide. If the coronavirus adversely affects the ability of our borrowers to satisfy their obligations, the demand for our loans, or our business operations, or leads to a significant or prolonged impact on global markets or economic growth, our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

The COVID-19 pandemic, trade wars, tariffs and similar events and disputes, domestic and international, have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, economic activity globally, nationally and locally. Such events also may adversely affect business and consumer confidence, generally. Any such adverse changes may adversely affect our profitability, growth asset quality and financial condition.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the financial markets and has resulted in a number of Federal Reserve actions. Market interest rates have declined significantly. On March 3, 2020, the 10-year Treasury yield fell below 1.00% for the first time, and the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 1.00% to 1.25%. On March 15, 2020, the Federal Reserve further reduced the target federal funds rate by 100 basis points to 0.00% to 0.25% and announced a $700 billion quantitative easing program in response to the expected economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Federal Reserve reduced the interest that it pays on excess reserves from 1.60% to 1.10% on March 3, 2020, and then to 0.10% on March 15, 2020. We expect that these reductions in interest rates, especially if prolonged, could adversely affect our net interest income and margins and our profitability.

Our business depends on our ability to successfully manage credit risk.

The operation of our business requires us to manage credit risk.  As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that our borrowers will be unable to repay their loans and leases according to their terms, and that the collateral securing repayment of their loans, if any, may not be sufficient to ensure repayment.  In addition, there are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to proper loan underwriting, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions and risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, including the risk that a borrower may not provide information to us about its business in a timely manner, and/or may present inaccurate or incomplete information to us, and risks relating to the value of collateral.  In order to manage credit risk successfully, we must, among other things, maintain disciplined and prudent underwriting standards and ensure that our bankers follow those standards.  The weakening of these standards for any reason, such as an attempt to attract higher yielding loans, a lack of discipline or diligence by our employees in underwriting and monitoring loans, the inability of our employees to adequately adapt policies and procedures to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting borrowers and the quality of our loan portfolio, may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge‑offs and may necessitate that we significantly increase our allowance for loan and lease losses, each of which could adversely affect our net income.  As a result, our inability to successfully manage credit risk could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The Corporation’s allowance for loan and lease losses may be insufficient, and an increase in the allowance would reduce earnings.

The credit quality of our loan and lease portfolio can have a significant impact on our earnings.  We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for loan and lease losses charged to expense representing managements best estimate of probable losses that may be incurred within our existing portfolio of loans and leases.  The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan and lease losses and risks inherent in our loan and lease portfolio.  The level of the allowance reflects managements continuing evaluation of specific credit risks; the quality of the loan and lease portfolio; the value of the underlying collateral; the level of non‑accruing loans and leases; incurred losses inherent in the current loan and lease portfolio; and economic, political and regulatory conditions.

17

Table of Contents

If the evaluation we perform in connection with establishing loan and lease loss reserves is insufficient, our allowance for loan and lease losses may not be sufficient to cover our losses, which would have an adverse effect on our operating results.

The regulators, in reviewing our loan and lease portfolio as part of a regulatory examination, may from time to time require us to increase our allowance for loan and lease losses, thereby negatively affecting our earnings, financial condition and capital ratios at that time. Moreover, additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions, new information regarding existing loans and leases, identification of additional impaired loans and leases and other factors, both within and outside of our control. Additions to the allowance could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

In addition, in June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued ASU 2016-13 (Topic 326 -Credit Losses), commonly referenced as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”).  This standard will replace the current approach under GAAP for establishing allowances for loan and lease losses (the “Allowance”), which generally considers only past events and current conditions, with a forward‑looking methodology that reflects the expected credit losses over the lives of financial assets, starting when such assets are first originated or acquired. Under the revised methodology, credit losses will be measured based on past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future conditions that affect the collectability of financial assets. We are currently evaluating the effect that the new accounting standard will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard will be effective for us as of January 1, 2023.

Our business, profitability and liquidity may be adversely affected by deterioration in the credit quality of, or defaults by, third parties who owe us money, securities or other assets or whose securities or obligations we hold.

In addition to relying on borrowers to repay their loans and leases, we are exposed to the risk that third parties that owe us money, securities or other assets will not perform their obligations.  These parties may default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons.  A default by a significant market participant, or concerns that such a party may default, could lead to significant liquidity problems, losses or defaults by other parties, which in turn could adversely affect us.

We are also subject to the risk that our rights against third parties may not be enforceable in all circumstances.  Deterioration in the credit quality of third parties whose securities or obligations we hold, including the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Government National Mortgage Corporation and municipalities, could result in significant losses.

Our mortgage lending business may not provide us with significant non-interest income.

The residential mortgage business is highly competitive, and highly susceptible to changes in market interest rates, consumer confidence levels, employment statistics, the capacity and willingness of secondary market purchasers to acquire and hold or securitize loans, and other factors beyond our control.

Because we sell substantially all of the mortgage loans we originate, the profitability of our mortgage banking business also depends in large part on our ability to aggregate a high volume of loans and sell them in the secondary market at a gain.  In fact, as rates rise, we expect increasing industry-wide competitive pressures related to changing market conditions to reduce our pricing margins and mortgage revenues generally.  Thus, in addition to our dependence on the interest rate environment, we are dependent upon (i) the existence of an active secondary market and (ii) our ability to profitably sell loans or securities into that market.  If our level of mortgage production declines, the profitability will depend upon our ability to reduce our costs commensurate with the reduction of revenue from our mortgage operations.

Our ability to originate and sell mortgage loans readily is dependent upon the availability of an active secondary market for single-family mortgage loans, which in turn depends in part upon the continuation of programs currently offered by government-sponsored entities (“GSEs”) and other institutional and non-institutional investors.  These entities account for a substantial portion of the secondary market in residential mortgage loans.  We are highly dependent on these purchasers continuing their mortgage purchasing programs.  Additionally, because the largest participants in the secondary market are Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, GSEs whose activities are governed by federal law, any future changes in laws that significantly affect the activity of these GSEs could, in turn, adversely affect our operations.  In September 2008,

18

Table of Contents

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into conservatorship by the U.S. government.  Long-term continue operation in government-run conservatorships is not sustainable for the GSEs but until Congress determines the future of the GSEs and the housing finance market, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) will continue to carry out its responsibilities as conservator.

Our loan servicing rights could become impaired, which may require us to take non-cash charges. 

Because we retain the servicing rights on many loans we sell in the secondary market, we are required to record mortgage servicing right assets and SBA servicing right assets, which we test quarterly for impairment. The values of these servicing rights are heavily dependent on market interest rates and tends to increase with rising interest rates and decrease with falling interest rates. If we are required to record an impairment charge, it would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may be required to repurchase mortgage loans or indemnify buyers against losses in some circumstances, which could harm liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

We sell substantially all of the mortgage loans held for sale that we originated.  When mortgage loans are sold, whether as whole loans or pursuant to a securitization, we are required to make customary representations and warranties to purchasers, guarantors and insurers, including the GSEs, about the mortgage loans and the manner in which they were originated.  Whole loan sale agreements require repurchase or substitute mortgage loans, or indemnify buyers against losses, in the event we breach these representations or warranties.  In addition, we may be required to repurchase mortgage loans as a result of early payment default of the borrower on a mortgage loan, resulting in these mortgage loans being placed on our books and subjecting us to the risk of a potential default.  

An economic slowdown could impact Meridian Wealth division revenues.

A general economic slowdown may cause current clients to seek alternative investment opportunities with other providers, which would decrease the value of Meridian Wealth’s assets under management resulting in lower fee income to the Corporation.    

A significant decrease in Meridian Wealth’s assets under management could lead to impairment of the goodwill recorded upon the acquisition of HJ Wealth in 2017. Goodwill is initially recorded at fair value and is not amortized, but is reviewed at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be fully recoverable. If our estimates of goodwill fair value change, we may determine that impairment charges are necessary. Estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons. If management’s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate, the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment may not be recognized in a timely manner. 

Fluctuations in market interest rates, particularly in a continuing period of low market interest rates, and relative balances of rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities, can negatively impact net interest margin and net interest income. 

The operations of financial institutions such as the Corporation are dependent to a large degree on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans and investments and interest expense on deposits and borrowings.

An institution's net interest income is significantly affected by market rates of interest that in turn are affected by prevailing economic conditions, by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and by the policies of various regulatory agencies. The FRB regulates the national money supply in order to manage recessionary and inflationary pressures. In doing so, the FRB may use techniques such as engaging in open market transactions of U.S. Government securities, changing the discount rate and changing reserve requirements against bank deposits. The use of these techniques may also affect interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The interest rate environment, which includes both the level of interest rates and the shape of the U.S. Treasury yield curve, has a significant impact on net interest income.

19

Table of Contents

Low market interest rates have pressured the net interest margin in recent years. Interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, have been originated, acquired or repriced at lower rates, reducing the average rate earned on those assets. While the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings, has also declined, the decline has not always occurred at the same pace as the decline in the average rate earned on interest-earning assets, resulting in a narrowing of the net interest margin.

Competition sometimes requires the Corporation to lower rates charged on loans more than the decline in market rates would otherwise indicate. Competition may also require the Corporation to pay higher rates on deposits than market rates would otherwise indicate. Thus, although loan demand has improved in recent years, intense competition among lenders has continued to place downward pressure on loan yields, also narrowing the net interest margin. Further, due to historically low market interest rates, rates paid on deposits have tended to reach a natural floor below which it is difficult to further reduce such rates.

Changes in interest rates might also impact the values of equity and debt securities under management and administration by the Meridian Wealth which may have a negative impact on fee income.

Like all financial institutions, the Corporation's consolidated statement of financial condition is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. See the section entitled “Interest Rate Risk” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, for the Corporation’s position on interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.

The value of the financial instruments we own may decline in the future.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned $68.9 million of investment securities, which consisted primarily of our positions in U.S. government and government‑sponsored enterprises and federal agency obligations, mortgage and asset‑backed securities and municipal securities.  We evaluate our investment securities on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic and market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether any decline in fair value below amortized cost is the result of an other‑than‑temporary impairment.  The process for determining whether impairment is other‑than‑temporary usually requires complex, subjective judgments about the future financial performance of the issuer in order to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest payments on the security.  Because of changing economic and market conditions affecting issuers, we may be required to recognize other‑than‑temporary impairment in future periods, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

In addition, an increase in market interest rates may affect the market value of our securities portfolio, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income and/or earnings.

Liquidity risks could affect operations and jeopardize our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our obligations, including financial commitments, as they come due and is inherent in our operations.  An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and/or investment securities and from other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity.  Our most important source of funds consists of our customer deposits.  Deposit balances can decrease for a variety of reasons, including when customers perceive alternative investments, such as the stock market, as providing a better risk/return tradeoff.  If customers move money out of bank deposits and into other investments, we could lose a stable source of funds.  This loss would require us to seek other funding alternatives, including wholesale funding, in order to continue to grow, thereby potentially increasing our funding costs and reducing our net interest income and net income.

Other primary sources of funds consist of cash from operations and investment maturities, redemptions and sales.  To a lesser extent, proceeds from the issuance and sale of securities to investors has become a source of funds.  Additional liquidity is provided by brokered certificates of deposits and we have the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the FHLB.  We also may borrow from correspondent banks or third party lenders from time to time.  Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our activities or on terms that are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us directly or the financial services industry or economy in general, such as disruptions in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry.  Economic conditions and a loss of confidence in financial institutions may increase our cost of funding and limit

20

Table of Contents

access to certain customary sources of capital, including inter‑bank borrowings, repurchase agreements and borrowings from the discount window of the Federal Reserve System.  

Any decline in available funding could adversely impact our ability to continue to implement our business plan, including originating loans, investing in securities, meeting our expenses or fulfilling obligations such as repaying our borrowings and meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Corporation’s liquidity is dependent on dividends from the Bank.

The Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank, which is a wholly‑owned banking subsidiary.  A substantial portion of our cash flow from operating activities, including cash flow to pay principal and interest on any debt we may incur, will come from dividends from the Bank.  Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to our shareholders.  For example, Pennsylvania law only permits the Bank to pay dividends out of its net profits then on hand, after first deducting the Banks losses and any debts owed to the Bank on which interest is past due and unpaid for a period of six months or more, unless the same are well secured and in the process of collection.  Also, our right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiarys liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiarys creditors.

Loss of deposits could increase our funding costs.

As do many banking companies, we rely on customer deposits to meet a considerable portion of our funding needs, and we continue to seek customer deposits to maintain this funding base.  We accept deposits directly from consumer and commercial customers and, as of December 31, 2019, we had $851.2 million in deposits.  These deposits are subject to potentially dramatic fluctuations in availability or the price we must pay (in the form of interest) to obtain them due to certain factors outside our control, such as a loss of confidence by customers in us or the banking sector generally, customer perceptions of our financial health and general reputation, increasing competitive pressures from other financial services firms for consumer or corporate customer deposits, changes in interest rates and returns on other investment classes, which could result in significant outflows of deposits within short periods of time or significant changes in pricing necessary to maintain current customer deposits or attract additional deposits.  The loss of customer deposits for any reason could increase our funding costs.

We may be adversely affected by changes in the actual or perceived soundness or condition of other financial institutions.

Financial services institutions that deal with each other are interconnected as a result of trading, investment, liquidity management, clearing, counterparty and other relationships.  Concerns about, or a default by, one institution could lead to significant liquidity problems and losses or defaults by other institutions, as the commercial and financial soundness of many financial institutions is closely related as a result of these credit, trading, clearing and other relationships.  Even the perceived lack of creditworthiness of, or questions about, a counterparty may lead to market‑wide liquidity problems and losses or defaults by various institutions.  This systemic risk may adversely affect financial intermediaries with which we interact on a daily basis or key funding providers such as the FHLB, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our access to liquidity or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We may need to raise additional capital in the future, and such capital may not be available when needed or at all.

We may need to raise additional capital, in the form of debt or equity securities, in the future to have sufficient capital resources to meet our commitments and fund our business needs and future growth, particularly if the quality of our assets or earnings were to deteriorate significantly.  Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on, among other things, conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of our control, and our financial condition.  We may not be able to obtain capital on acceptable terms or at all.  Any occurrence that may limit our access to capital, such as a decline in the confidence of debt purchasers, depositors of the Bank or counterparties participating in the capital markets or other disruption in capital markets, may adversely affect our capital costs and our ability to raise capital and, in turn,

21

Table of Contents

our liquidity.  Further, if we need to raise capital in the future, we may have to do so when many other financial institutions are also seeking to raise capital and would then have to compete with those institutions for investors.  An inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and could be dilutive to both tangible book value and our share price.

We may not be able to implement our growth strategy or manage costs effectively, resulting in lower earnings or profitability.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to grow and to be profitable in future periods, or, if profitable, that our overall earnings will remain consistent or increase in the future.  Our strategy is focused on organic growth, supplemented by opportunistic acquisitions.

Our growth requires that we increase our loan and deposit growth while managing risks by following prudent loan underwriting standards without increasing interest rate risk or compressing our net interest margin, maintaining more than adequate capital at all times, hiring and retaining qualified employees and successfully implementing strategic projects and initiatives.  Even if we are able to increase our interest income, our earnings may nonetheless be reduced by increased expenses, such as additional employee compensation or other general and administrative expenses and increased interest expense on any liabilities incurred or deposits solicited to fund increases in assets.  Additionally, if our competitors extend credit on terms we find to pose excessive risks, or at interest rates which we believe do not warrant the credit exposure, we may not be able to maintain our lending volume and could experience deteriorating financial performance.

Our inability to manage our growth successfully or to continue to expand into new markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The occurrence of fraudulent activity, breaches or failures of our information security controls or cybersecurity‑related incidents could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

As a financial institution, we are susceptible to fraudulent activity, information security breaches and cybersecurity‑related incidents that may be committed against us or our clients, which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our clients, disclosure or misuse of our information or our client information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our clients, litigation or damage to our reputation.  Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts.  Information security breaches and cybersecurity‑related incidents may include fraudulent or unauthorized access to systems used by us or our clients, denial or degradation of service attacks, and malware or other cyberattacks.  In recent periods, there continues to be a rise in electronic fraudulent activity, security breaches and cyberattacks within the financial services industry, especially in the commercial banking sector due to cyber criminals targeting commercial bank accounts.  Consistent with industry trends, we have also experienced an increase in attempted electronic fraudulent activity, security breaches and cybersecurity‑related incidents in recent periods.  Moreover, in recent periods, several large corporations, including financial institutions and retail companies, have suffered major data breaches, in some cases exposing not only confidential and proprietary corporate information, but also sensitive financial and other personal information of their customers and employees and subjecting them to potential fraudulent activity.  Some of our clients may have been affected by these breaches, which could increase their risks of identity theft and other fraudulent activity that could involve their accounts with us.

We also face risks related to cyberattacks and other security breaches in connection with debit card transactions that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding our customers through various third parties, including retailers and payment processors.  Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyberattacks, and because the transactions involve third parties and environments such as the point of sale that we do not control or secure, future security breaches or cyberattacks affecting any of these third parties could affect us through no fault of our own, and in some cases we may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them, including costs to replace compromised debit cards and address fraudulent transactions.

Information pertaining to us and our customers is maintained, and transactions are executed, on networks and systems maintained by us and certain third party partners, such as our online banking or reporting systems.  The secure maintenance

22

Table of Contents

and transmission of confidential information, as well as execution of transactions over these systems, are essential to protect us and our customers against fraud and security breaches and to maintain our customers confidence.  Breaches of information security also may occur, through intentional or unintentional acts by those having access to our systems or our customers or counterparties confidential information, including employees.  In addition, increases in criminal activity levels and sophistication, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries, vulnerabilities in third party technologies (including browsers and operating systems) or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology, processes and controls that we use to prevent fraudulent transactions and to protect data about us, our customers and underlying transactions, as well as the technology used by our customers to access our systems.  Although we have developed, and continue to invest in, systems and processes that are designed to detect and prevent security breaches and cyberattacks and periodically test our security, our or our third party partners inability to anticipate, or failure to adequately mitigate, breaches of security could result in: losses to us or our customers; our loss of business and/or customers; damage to our reputation; the incurrence of additional expenses; disruption to our business; our inability to grow our online services or other businesses; additional regulatory scrutiny or penalties; or our exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liabilityany of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

More generally, publicized information concerning security and cyber‑related problems could inhibit the use or growth of electronic or web‑based applications or solutions as a means of conducting commercial transactions.  Such publicity may also cause damage to our reputation as a financial institution.  As a result, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

We depend on information technology and telecommunications systems of third parties, and any systems failures, interruptions or data breaches involving these systems could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

Our business is highly dependent on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems, third party servicers, accounting systems, mobile and online banking platforms and financial intermediaries.  We outsource to third parties many of our major systems, such as data processing, loan servicing, deposit processing and internal audit systems.  The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations.  Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third party systems fail or experience interruptions.  If sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could result in a deterioration of our ability to process loans or gather deposits and provide customer service, compromise our ability to operate effectively, result in potential noncompliance with applicable laws or regulations, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business and/or subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  In addition, failure of third parties to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or fraud or misconduct on the part of employees of any of these third parties could disrupt our operations or adversely affect our reputation.

It may be difficult for us to replace some of our third party vendors, particularly vendors providing our core banking, debit card services and information services, in a timely manner if they are unwilling or unable to provide us with these services in the future for any reason and even if we are able to replace them, it may be at higher cost or result in the loss of customers.  Any such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our operations rely heavily on the secure processing, storage and transmission of information and the monitoring of a large number of transactions on a minute‑by‑minute basis, and even a short interruption in service could have significant consequences.  We also interact with and rely on retailers, for whom we process transactions, as well as financial counterparties and regulators.  Each of these third parties may be targets of the same types of fraudulent activity, computer break‑ins and other cyber security breaches described above or herein, and the cyber security measures that they maintain to mitigate the risk of such activity may be different than our own and may be inadequate.

As a result of financial entities and technology systems becoming more interdependent and complex, a cyber incident, information breach or loss, or technology failure that compromises the systems or data of one or more financial entities

23

Table of Contents

could have a material impact on counterparties or other market participants, including ourselves.  Although we review business continuity and backup plans for our vendors and take other safeguards to support our operations, such plans or safeguards may be inadequate.  As a result of the foregoing, our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by any significant disruptions to us or to third parties with whom we interact.

Our use of third party vendors and our other ongoing third party business relationships is subject to increasing regulatory requirements and attention.

Our use of third party vendors for certain information systems is subject to increasingly demanding regulatory requirements and attention by our federal bank regulators.  Recent regulation requires us to enhance our due diligence, ongoing monitoring and control over our third party vendors and other ongoing third party business relationships.  In certain cases we may be required to renegotiate our agreements with these vendors to meet these enhanced requirements, which could increase our costs.  We expect that our regulators will hold us responsible for deficiencies in our oversight and control of our third party relationships and in the performance of the parties with which we have these relationships.  As a result, if our regulators conclude that we have not exercised adequate oversight and control over our third party vendors or other ongoing third party business relationships or that such third parties have not performed appropriately, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including civil money penalties or other administrative or judicial penalties or fines as well as requirements for customer remediation, any of which could have a material adverse effect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We continually encounter technological change.

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new, technology‑driven products and services.  The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to serve customers better and to reduce costs.  Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations.  Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements than we do.  We may not be able to effectively implement new, technology‑driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers.  In addition, the implementation of technological changes and upgrades to maintain current systems and integrate new ones may also cause service interruptions, transaction processing errors and system conversion delays and may cause us to fail to comply with applicable laws.  Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry and failure to avoid interruptions, errors and delays could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We expect that new technologies and business processes applicable to the banking industry will continue to emerge, and these new technologies and business processes may be better than those we currently use.  Because the pace of technological change is high and our industry is intensely competitive, we may not be able to sustain our investment in new technology as critical systems and applications become obsolete or as better ones become available.  A failure to maintain current technology and business processes could cause disruptions in our operations or cause our products and services to be less competitive, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Current or former employee or predecessor misconduct could expose us to significant legal liability and reputational harm.

We are vulnerable to reputational harm because we operate in an industry in which integrity and the confidence of our customers are of critical importance.  Our employees could engage, or our former directors, employees, or controlling shareholders could have engaged, in misconduct that adversely affects our business.  For example, if such a person were to engage, or previously engaged, in fraudulent, illegal or suspicious activities, we could be subject to regulatory sanctions and suffer serious harm to our reputation (as a consequence of the negative perception resulting from such activities), financial position, customer relationships and ability to attract new customers.  Our business often requires that we deal with confidential information.  If our employees were to improperly use or disclose this information, or if former directors, employees, or controlling shareholders previously improperly used or disclosed this information, even if inadvertently, we

24

Table of Contents

could suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial position and current and future business relationships.  It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not always be effective.  Misconduct by our employees or former directors, employees, or controlling shareholders, or even unsubstantiated allegations of misconduct, could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We may not be able to attract and retain key personnel and other skilled employees.

Our success depends, in large part, on the skills of our management team and our ability to retain, recruit and motivate key officers and employees.  There is a limited number of qualified persons with requisite knowledge of, and experience in, certain of our specialized business lines.  A number of our employees have considerable tenure with Meridian, which makes succession planning important to the continued operation of our business.  We need to continue to attract and retain key personnel and to recruit qualified individuals who fit our culture to succeed existing key personnel to ensure the continued growth and successful operation of our business.  Leadership changes may occur from time to time, and we cannot predict whether significant retirements or resignations will occur or whether we will be able to recruit additional qualified personnel.  Competition for senior executives and skilled personnel in the financial services and banking industry is intense, which means the cost of hiring, incentivizing and retaining skilled personnel may continue to increase.  This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.  The loss of the services of any senior executive or other key personnel, the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future or the failure to develop and implement a viable succession plan, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

New lines of business, products, product enhancements or services may subject us to additional risks.

From time to time, we may implement new lines of business or offer new products and product enhancements as well as new services within our existing lines of business.  There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances in which the markets are not fully developed.  In implementing, developing or marketing new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services, we may invest significant time and resources, although we may not assign the appropriate level of resources or expertise necessary to make these new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services successful or to realize their expected benefits.  Further, initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services may not be achieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible.  External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also affect the ultimate implementation of a new line of business or offerings of new products, product enhancements or services.  Furthermore, any new line of business, product, product enhancement or service or system conversion could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls.  Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or offerings of new products, product enhancements or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our business may be adversely affected by conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions generally.

Our financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of our borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services we offer, is highly dependent upon the business environment in the markets in which we operate and in the United States as a whole.  Unlike larger banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial services to customers primarily in southeast Pennsylvania, Delaware and southern New Jersey.  The economic conditions in this local market may be different from, or worse than, the economic conditions in the United States as a whole.  Some elements of the business environment that affect our financial performance include short‑term and long‑term interest rates, the prevailing yield curve, inflation and price levels, tax policy, monetary policy, unemployment and the strength of the domestic economy and the local economy in the markets in which we operate.  Unfavorable market conditions can result in a deterioration in the credit quality of our borrowers and the demand for our products and services, an increase in the number of loan delinquencies, defaults and charge‑offs, additional provisions for loan and lease losses, adverse asset values and an overall material adverse effect on the quality of our loan and lease portfolio.  Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions can be caused by, among other factors, declines in economic growth, business activity or investor

25

Table of Contents

or business confidence; limitations on the availability or increases in the cost of credit and capital; changes in inflation or interest rates; increases in real estate and other state and local taxes; high unemployment; natural disasters; or a combination of these or other factors.

In recent years, economic growth and business activity across a wide range of industries has been slow and uneven. There are continuing concerns related to the level of U.S. government debt, fiscal actions that may be taken to address that debt, energy price volatility, global economic conditions, and significant uncertainty with respect to domestic and international fiscal and monetary policy. Economic pressure on consumers and uncertainty about continuing economic improvement may result in changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing, and savings habits. There can be no assurance that these conditions will improve or that these conditions will not worsen. Such conditions could adversely affect the credit quality of the Bank’s loans and the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Additionally, the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics, such as the spread of the coronavirus ("COVID-19"), could lead to regional quarantines, business shutdowns, labor shortages, disruptions to supply chains, and overall economic instability. Events such as these may become more common in the future and could cause significant damage such as disrupt power and communication services, impact the stability of our facilities and result in additional expenses, impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, reduce the value of collateral securing the repayment of our loans, which could result in the loss of revenue. While we have established and regularly test disaster recovery procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition.

Our business is significantly dependent on the real estate markets in which we operate, as a significant percentage of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate or mortgage loans originated for sale.

Many of the loans in our portfolio are secured by real estate.  As of December 31, 2019, our real estate loans, excluding mortgages held for sale, include $172.0 million of construction and development loans, $81.6 million of home equity loans, $325.4 million of commercial real estate (CRE) loans and $53.7 million of residential mortgage loans, with the majority of these real estate loans concentrated in the southeast Pennsylvania, Delaware and southern New Jersey.  Real property values in our market may be different from, and in some instances worse than, real property values in other markets or in the United States as a whole, and may be affected by a variety of factors outside of our control and the control of our borrowers, including national and local economic conditions, generally.  Southeast Pennsylvania, Delaware and southern New Jersey has experienced volatility in real estate values over the past decade.  Declines in real estate values, including prices for homes and commercial properties in southeast Pennsylvania, Delaware and southern New Jersey, could result in a deterioration of the credit quality of our borrowers, an increase in the number of loan delinquencies, defaults and charge‑offs, and reduced demand for our products and services, generally.  

Our small business customers may lack the resources to weather a downturn in the economy.

One of our primary strategies is serving the banking and financial services needs of small and medium sized businesses.  These businesses generally have fewer financial resources than larger entities and less access to capital sources and loan facilities.  If economic conditions are generally unfavorable in our market areas, our small business borrowers may be disproportionately affected and their ability to repay outstanding loans may be negatively affected, resulting in an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We operate in a highly competitive and changing industry and market area and compete with both banks and non‑banks.

We operate in the highly competitive financial services industry and face significant competition for customers from financial institutions located both within and beyond our principal markets.  We compete with national commercial banks, regional banks, private banks, savings banks, credit unions, non‑bank financial services companies and other financial institutions operating within or near the areas we serve, many of whom target the same customers we do in southeast Pennsylvania, Delaware and southern New Jersey.  As customer preferences and expectations continue to evolve, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the Internet and for non‑banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as

26

Table of Contents

automatic transfer and automatic payment systems.  The banking industry is experiencing rapid changes in technology, and, as a result, our future success will depend in part on our ability to address our customers needs by using technology.  Customer loyalty can be influenced by a competitors new products, especially offerings that could provide cost savings or a higher return to the customer.  We may not be able to compete successfully with other financial institutions in our markets, particularly with larger financial institutions operating in our markets that have significantly greater resources than us, and we may have to pay higher interest rates to attract deposits, accept lower yields to attract loans and pay higher wages for new employees, resulting in lower net interest margins and reduced profitability.  Many of our non‑bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern our activities and may have greater flexibility in competing for business.  The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation.  Our inability to compete successfully in the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our ability to maintain, attract and retain customer relationships is highly dependent on our reputation.

We rely, in part, on the reputation of the Bank to attract customers and retain our customer relationships.  Damage to our reputation could undermine the confidence of our current and potential customers in our ability to provide high‑quality financial services.  Such damage could also impair the confidence of our counterparties and vendors and ultimately affect our ability to effect transactions.  Maintenance of our reputation depends not only on our success in maintaining our service‑focused culture and controlling and mitigating the various risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K, but also on our success in identifying and appropriately addressing issues that may arise in areas such as potential conflicts of interest, anti‑money laundering, customer personal information and privacy issues, customer and other third party fraud, record‑keeping, regulatory investigations and any litigation that may arise from the failure or perceived failure of us to comply with legal and regulatory requirements.  Maintaining our reputation also depends on our ability to successfully prevent third parties from infringing on the Meridian brand and associated trademarks and our other intellectual property.  Defense of our reputation, trademarks and other intellectual property, including through litigation, could result in costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Severe weather, natural disasters, pandemics, acts of war or terrorism or other external events could significantly impact our business.

Severe weather, natural disasters, widespread disease or pandemics, acts of war or terrorism or other adverse external events could have a significant impact on our ability to conduct business.  In addition, such events could affect the stability of our deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans and leases, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue or cause us to incur additional expenses.  The occurrence of any of these events in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Accounting standards periodically change and the application of our accounting policies and methods may require management to make estimates about matters that are uncertain.

The regulatory bodies that establish accounting standards, including, among others, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC, periodically revise or issue new financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The effect of such revised or new standards on our financial statements can be difficult to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, management must exercise judgment in appropriately applying many of our accounting policies and methods so they comply with generally accepted accounting principles. In some cases, management may have to select a particular accounting policy or method from two or more alternatives. In some cases, the accounting policy or method chosen might be reasonable under the circumstances and yet might result in our reporting materially different amounts than would have been reported if we had selected a different policy or method. Accounting policies are critical to fairly presenting our financial condition and results of operations and may require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain.

27

Table of Contents

The Corporation’s controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented.

Our management diligently reviews and updates the Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any failure or undetected circumvention of these controls could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

The banking industry is highly regulated, and the regulatory framework, together with any future legislative or regulatory changes, may have a significant adverse effect on our operations.

The banking industry is extensively regulated and supervised under both federal and state laws and regulations that are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, customers, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not for the protection of our shareholders and creditors.  The Corporation is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve, and the Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the FDIC and the PDBS.  The laws and regulations applicable to us govern a variety of matters, including permissible types, amounts and terms of loans and investments we may make, the maximum interest rate that may be charged, the amount of reserves we must hold against deposits we take, the types of deposits we may accept, maintenance of adequate capital and liquidity, changes in the control of us, restrictions on dividends and establishment of new offices.  We must obtain approval from our regulators before engaging in certain activities, and there is the risk that such approvals may not be obtained, either in a timely manner or at all.  Our regulators also have the ability to compel us to take certain actions, or restrict us from taking certain actions entirely, such as actions that our regulators deem to constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.  Our failure to comply with any applicable laws or regulations, or regulatory policies and interpretations of such laws and regulations, could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties or damage to our reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are subject to capital adequacy requirements and may be subject to more stringent capital requirements.

We are subject to capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that we must maintain.  From time to time, the regulators change these regulatory capital adequacy and liquidity guidelines.  If we fail to meet these minimum capital adequacy and liquidity guidelines and other regulatory requirements, we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in the types of activities we may conduct and we may be prohibited from taking certain capital actions, such as paying dividends and repurchasing or redeeming capital securities.  See Supervision and RegulationRegulatory Capital Requirements for more information on the capital adequacy standards that we must meet and maintain.

While we currently meet the requirements of the Basel III‑based Capital Rules, we may fail to do so in the future.  The failure to meet applicable regulatory capital requirements could result in one or more of our regulators placing limitations or conditions on our activities, including our growth initiatives, or restricting the commencement of new activities, and could affect customer and investor confidence, our costs of funds and level of required deposit insurance assessments to the FDIC, our ability to pay dividends on our capital stock, our ability to make acquisitions, and our business, results of operations and financial conditions, generally.

Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may adversely affect the Corporation’s earnings.

Since 2008, poor economic conditions and the resulting bank failures increased the costs of the FDIC and depleted its deposit insurance fund. In more recent history, the FDIC fund position has improved and the cost basis has been updated which in some cases can result in decreased costs of the insurance fund. Additional bank failures may prompt the FDIC to increase its premiums above the recently increased levels or to issue special assessments. The Corporation is generally unable to control the amount of premiums or special assessments that its subsidiary is required to pay for FDIC insurance. Any future changes in the calculation or assessment of FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations, financial condition, and its ability to continue to pay dividends on its common stock at the current rate or at all.

28

Table of Contents

Federal and state regulators periodically examine our business, and we may be required to remediate adverse examination findings.

The FDIC, PDBS and the Federal Reserve periodically examine our business, including our compliance with laws and regulations.  If, as a result of an examination, a banking agency were to determine that our financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of any of our operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we or our predecessor were in violation of any law or regulation, they may take a number of different remedial actions as they deem appropriate.  These actions include the power to enjoin unsafe or unsound practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth, to assess civil money penalties, to fine or remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance and place the Bank into receivership or conservatorship.  Any regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to pay dividends may be limited; consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments.  We expect that we will retain all earnings, if any, for operating capital, and we do not expect our board of directors to declare any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.  Even if we have earnings in an amount sufficient to pay cash dividends, our board of directors may decide to retain earnings for the purpose of financing growth.  We cannot assure you that cash dividends on our common stock will ever be paid.  You should not purchase shares of common stock offered hereby if you need or desire dividend income from this investment.

In addition, our ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the federal and state bank regulators regarding capital adequacy and dividends.

Further, if we are unable to satisfy the capital requirements applicable to us for any reason, we may not be able to make, or may have to reduce or eliminate, the payment of dividends on our common stock in the event we decide to declare dividends.  Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Previously enacted and potential future legislation, including legislation to reform the U.S. financial regulatory system, could adversely affect our business.

The change in President and political party controlling the Executive Branch of the Federal Government resulting from the 2016 U.S. presidential election has brought changes to laws and regulations of the U.S. financial services industry, including the EGRRCPA, and may continue to bring changes that we cannot now predict. The EGRRCPA, which amended the Dodd-Frank Act, directed certain federal banking regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve, to take action to reduce the regulatory burden on certain banks and financial institutions. Federal banking regulatory agencies are currently working on taking the actions congressionally mandated by the EGRRCPA; however, uncertainty about the timing and scope of any such changes as well as the cost of complying with a new regulatory regime, may negatively impact our business, at least in the short-term, even if the long-term impact of any such changes are positive for our business. Further, it is unknown what impact the 2018 congressional elections and change in leadership of the House of Representatives will have on future legislation.

Market conditions have resulted in the creation of various programs by the United States Congress, the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC that were designed to enhance market liquidity and bank capital. As these programs expire, are withdrawn or reduced, or new programs are adopted or considered, the impact on the financial markets, banks in general and their customers is unknown. This could have the effect of, among other things, reducing liquidity, raising interest rates, reducing fee revenue, limiting the ability to raise capital, all of which could have an adverse impact on the financial condition of the Bank and the Corporation.

29

Table of Contents

Additionally, the federal government has passed a variety of other reforms related to banking and the financial industry including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act imposed significant regulatory and compliance changes. Effects of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business include:

·

changes to regulatory capital requirements;

·

exclusion of hybrid securities, including trust preferred securities, issued on or after May 19, 2010 from Tier I capital;

·

creation of new government regulatory agencies (such as the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which will oversee systemic risk, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will develop and enforce rules for bank and non-bank providers of consumer financial products);

·

potential limitations on federal preemption;

·

changes to deposit insurance assessments;

·

regulation of debit interchange fees we earn;

·

changes in retail banking regulations, including potential limitations on certain fees we may charge; and

·

changes in regulation of consumer mortgage loan origination and risk retention.

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act restricts the ability of banks to engage in certain proprietary trading or to sponsor or invest in private equity or hedge funds, commonly referred to as the Volcker Rule. The EGRRCPA provided an exemption from the Volcker Rule’s restrictions for banks with less than $250 billion in assets. The Dodd-Frank Act also contains provisions designed to limit the ability of insured depository institutions, their holding companies and their affiliates to conduct certain swaps and derivatives activities and to take certain principal positions in financial instruments.

Some provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act became effective immediately upon its enactment. Many provisions, however, require regulations to be promulgated by various federal agencies in order to be implemented, some of which have been proposed by the applicable federal agencies. The provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act may have unintended effects, which will not be clear until implementation. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act could limit our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage requirements or otherwise materially and adversely affect us. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make any changes necessary to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with the new requirements could also materially and adversely affect us.

Rulemaking changes implemented by the CFPB may result in higher regulatory and compliance costs that could adversely affect our results of operations.

The Dodd‑Frank Act created a new, independent federal agency, the CFPB, which was granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws.  The consumer protection provisions of the Dodd‑Frank Act and the examination, supervision and enforcement of those laws and implementing regulations by the CFPB have created a more intense and complex environment for consumer finance regulation.  See Supervision and RegulationConsumer Financial Protection.  Notwithstanding that insured depository institutions with assets of $10 billion or less (such as the Bank) will continue to be supervised and examined by their primary federal regulators, the ultimate impact of this heightened scrutiny is uncertain and could result in changes to pricing, practices, products and procedures.  It could also result in increased costs related to regulatory oversight, supervision and examination, remediation efforts and possible penalties.

Litigation and regulatory actions, including possible enforcement actions, could subject us to significant fines, penalties, judgments or other requirements resulting in increased expenses or restrictions on our business activities.

Our business is subject to increased litigation and regulatory risks as a result of a number of factors, including the highly regulated nature of the financial services industry and the focus of state and federal prosecutors on banks and the financial services industry generally.  This focus has only intensified since the Great Recession, with regulators and prosecutors focusing on a variety of financial institution practices and requirements, including foreclosure practices, compliance with applicable consumer protection laws, classification of held for sale assets and compliance with anti‑money laundering

30

Table of Contents

statutes, the Bank Secrecy Act and sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (OFAC).

In the normal course of business, from time to time, we have in the past and may in the future be named as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation, arising in connection with our current and/or prior business activities.  Legal actions could include claims for substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages.  In addition, while the arbitration provisions in certain of our customer agreements historically have limited our exposure to consumer class action litigation, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in enforcing our arbitration clause in the future.  Further, we have in the past, and may in the future be subject to consent orders with our regulators.  We may also, from time to time, be the subject of subpoenas, requests for information, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies regarding our current and/or prior business activities.  Any such legal or regulatory actions may subject us to substantial compensatory or punitive damages, significant fines, penalties, obligations to change our business practices or other requirements resulting in increased expenses, diminished income and damage to our reputation.  Our involvement in any such matters, whether tangential or otherwise and even if the matters are ultimately determined in our favor, could also cause significant harm to our reputation and divert management attention from the operation of our business.  Further, any settlement, consent order or adverse judgment in connection with any formal or informal proceeding or investigation by government agencies may result in litigation, investigations or proceedings as other litigants and government agencies begin independent reviews of the same activities.  As a result, the outcome of legal and regulatory actions could be material to our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows depending on, among other factors, the level of our earnings for that period, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Non‑compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, the Bank Secrecy Act or other laws and regulations could result in fines or sanctions against us.

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and the Bank Secrecy Act require financial institutions to design and implement programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities.  If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.  These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new financial accounts.  Federal and state bank regulators also have focused on compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and anti‑money laundering regulations.  Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions, including restrictions on conducting acquisitions or establishing new branches.  In recent years, several banking institutions have received large fines for non‑compliance with these laws and regulations.  While we have developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, these policies and procedures may not be effective in preventing violations of these laws and regulations.  Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have serious reputational consequences for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Regulations relating to privacy, information security and data protection could increase our costs, affect or limit how we collect and use personal information and adversely affect our business opportunities.

We are subject to various privacy, information security and data protection laws, including requirements concerning security breach notification, and we could be negatively affected by these laws.  For example, our business is subject to the Gramm‑Leach‑Bliley Act which, among other things: (i) imposes certain limitations on our ability to share nonpublic personal information about our customers with nonaffiliated third parties; (ii) requires that we provide certain disclosures to customers about our information collection, sharing and security practices and afford customers the right to opt out of any information sharing by us with nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions) and (iii) requires that we develop, implement and maintain a written comprehensive information security program containing appropriate safeguards based on our size and complexity, the nature and scope of our activities, and the sensitivity of customer information we process, as well as plans for responding to data security breaches.  Various state and federal banking regulators and states have also enacted data security breach notification requirements with varying levels of individual, consumer, regulatory or law enforcement notification in certain circumstances in the event of a security breach.  Moreover, legislators and regulators in

31

Table of Contents

the United States are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, information security and data protection laws that potentially could have a significant impact on our current and planned privacy, data protection and information security‑related practices, our collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer or employee information, and some of our current or planned business activities.  This could also increase our costs of compliance and business operations and could reduce income from certain business initiatives.  This includes increased privacy‑related enforcement activity at the federal level, by the Federal Trade Commission and CFPB, as well as at the state level, such as with regard to mobile applications.

Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection and information security laws (including those regarding security breach notification) affecting customer or employee data to which we are subject could result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict our ability to provide certain products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions or results of operations.  Our failure to comply with privacy, data protection and information security laws could result in potentially significant regulatory or governmental investigations or actions, litigation, fines, sanctions and damage to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are subject to environmental liability risk associated with our lending activities and with the property we own.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property.  During the ordinary course of business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans and there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties, notwithstanding our prior due diligence.  We also own our corporate headquarters and it is possible that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on this property.  If hazardous or toxic substances are found, we may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage.  Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected propertys value or limit our ability to use or sell the affected property.  In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability.  The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may be adversely affected by risks associated with completed and potential acquisitions, including execution risks, failure to realize anticipated transaction benefits, and failure to overcome integration risks, which could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

We plan to grow our businesses organically but remain open to considering potential smaller bank or other acquisition opportunities that fit within the deposit strength and commercial orientation of our franchise and that we believe support our businesses and make financial and strategic sense.  In the event that we do pursue acquisitions, we may have difficulty executing on acquisitions and may not realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction we complete.  Any of the foregoing matters could materially and adversely affect us.

Generally, any acquisition of target financial institutions, branches or other banking assets by us will require approval by, and cooperation from, a number of governmental regulatory agencies, possibly including the Federal Reserve and the FDIC as well as the PDBS.  In evaluating applications seeking approval of acquisitions, such regulators consider factors such as, among other things, the competitive effect and public benefits of the transaction, the capital position and managerial resources of the combined organization, the risks to the stability of the U.S. banking or financial system, the applicants performance record under the CRA, the applicants compliance with fair housing and other consumer protection laws and the effectiveness of all organizations involved in combating money laundering activities.  Such regulators could deny our application, which would restrict our growth, or the regulatory approvals may not be granted on terms that are acceptable to us.  For example, we could be required to sell branches as a condition to receiving regulatory approvals, and such a condition may not be acceptable to us or may reduce the benefit of an acquisition.

As to any acquisition that we complete, including the acquisition of HJ Wealth in 2017 we may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated transaction benefits if the integration process takes longer or is more costly than expected or otherwise fails to meet our expectations.

32

Table of Contents

In addition, acquisition activities could be material to our business and involve a number of risks, including the following:

·

incurring time and expense associated with identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions and negotiating potential transactions, resulting in the Corporation’s attention being diverted from the operation of our existing business;

·

using inaccurate estimates and judgments to evaluate credit, operations, management, and market risks with respect to the target institution or assets;

·

potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of banks and businesses we acquire;

·

the time and expense required to integrate the operations and personnel of the combined businesses;

·

experiencing higher operating expenses relative to operating income from the new operations;

·

creating an adverse short-term effect on our results of operations;

·

losing key employees and customers as a result of an acquisition that is poorly received;

·

risk of significant problems relating to the conversion of the financial and customer data of the entity being acquired into the Corporation’s financial and customer product systems; and,

·

potential impairment of goodwill or intangible assets created in business acquisitions.

We may not be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with potential acquisitions.  Our inability to overcome these risks could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our business strategy and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our stock price, like many of our peers, may be volatile, and you could lose part or all of your investment as a result.

Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive.  Our stock price may fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:

·

actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly results of operations;

·

recommendations or research reports about us or the financial services industry in general published by securities analysts;

·

the failure of securities analysts to cover, or continue to cover, us after this offering;

·

operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;

·

news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry;

·

perceptions in the marketplace regarding us, our competitors or other financial institutions;

·

future sales of our common stock;

·

departure of our management team or other key personnel;

·

new technology used, or services offered, by competitors;

·

significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving us or our competitors;

·

changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations, or differing interpretations thereof affecting our business, or enforcement of these laws and regulations;

·

litigation and governmental investigations; and

·

geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.

If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to litigation that, even if our defense is successful, could distract our management and be costly to defend.  General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and eventssuch as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trendscould also cause our stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.

33

Table of Contents

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and because we have decided to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting and other requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, our common stock could be less attractive to investors.

For as long as we remain an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act, we will have the option to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting and other requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes‑Oxley), being permitted to have an extended transition period for adopting any new or revised accounting standards that may be issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the SEC reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.  We have elected to, and expect to continue to, take advantage of certain of these and other exemptions until we are no longer an emerging growth company.  If we do so, we will prominently disclose this decision in the first periodic report following our decision, and such decision is irrevocable.  Although the JOBS Act allowed us to present only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in our registration statement for our initial public offering, we elected to provide five years of selected financial data.

Because we have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards for an “emerging growth company” our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with these accounting standards as of the public company effective dates.

We have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.  This election allows us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies.  As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with these accounting standards as of the public company effective dates.  Consequently, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.  Because our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates, investors may have difficulty evaluating or comparing our business, performance or prospects in comparison to other public companies, which may have a negative impact on the value and liquidity of our common stock.  We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we plan to rely on this exemption.  If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Certain banking laws and certain provisions of our articles of incorporation may have an anti‑takeover effect.

Provisions of federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial to our shareholders.  Acquisition of 10% or more of any class of voting stock of a bank holding company or depository institution, generally creates a rebuttable presumption that the acquirer controls the bank holding company or depository institution.  Also, a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before, among other things, acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank, including the Bank.

There also are provisions in our articles of incorporation and our bylaws, such as limitations on the ability to call a special meeting of our shareholders, that may be used to delay or block a takeover attempt.  In addition, our board of directors are be authorized under our articles of incorporation to issue shares of our preferred stock, and determine the rights, terms conditions and privileges of such preferred stock, without shareholder approval.  These provisions may effectively inhibit a non‑negotiated merger or other business combination, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

34

Table of Contents

Item 2. Properties

The Corporation is headquartered in Malvern, Pennsylvania and has six full-service branches.  Its main branch, in Paoli, serves the Main Line.  The West Chester and Media branches serve Chester and Delaware counties, respectively, while the Doylestown and Blue Bell branches serve Bucks and Montgomery counties, respectively.  The Philadelphia branch opened December 2017.  In addition to our deposit taking branches, there are currently 11 other offices, including headquarters for Corporate, the Wealth Division and the Mortgage Division.  Other than our corporate headquarters, all of our offices are leased.  The Bank had a net book value of $6.2 million for all locations at December 31, 2019.

Branch locations:

·

Paoli Branch – 1176 Lancaster Avenue, Paoli, PA 19301

·

West Chester Branch – 16 W. Market Street, West Chester, PA 19382

·

Media Branch – 100 E. State Street, Media, PA 19063

·

Doylestown Branch – 1719A S. Easton Road, Doylestown, PA 18901

·

Blue Bell Branch – 653 Skippack Pike, Ste. 116, Blue Bell, PA 19422

·

Philadelphia Branch – 1760 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103

 

Other offices:

·

Corporate Headquarters – 9 Old Lincoln Highway, Malvern, PA 19355

·

Mortgage Headquarters – 653 Skippack Pike, Suite 200, Blue Bell, PA 19462

·

Meridian Wealth Office –    653 Skippack Pike, Suite 200, Blue Bell, PA 19462

·

Mortgage Loan Production Office – 1601 Concord Pike, Suite 45, Wilmington, DE 19803

·

Mortgage Loan Production Office – 5301 Limestone Road, Suite 202, Wilmington, DE 19801

·

Mortgage Loan Production Office – 22128 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE 19973

·

Mortgage Loan Production Office – 111 Continental Drive, Suite 406, Newark, DE 19713

·

Mortgage Loan Production Office – 5001 Louise Drive, Suite 101, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055

·

Mortgage Loan Production Office – 350 Highland Drive, Suite 160, Mountville, PA 17554

·

Mortgage Loan Production Office – 2330 New Road, Northfield, NJ 08225

·

Mortgage Loan Production Office – 1221 College Park Drive, Suite 118, Dover, DE 19904

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

On November 21, 2017, three former employees of the mortgage-banking division of the Bank filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Juan Jordan et al. v. Meridian Bank, Thomas Campbell and Christopher Annas, against the Bank purporting to be a class and collective action seeking unpaid and overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law, and the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act of 1968 on behalf of similarly situated plaintiffs. In September 2019, plaintiffs’ counsel and the Bank agreed to move forward with non-binding mediation.  Although the Bank believes it had strong and meritorious defenses, given the expense and inconvenience of  litigation, on July 24, 2019 through mediation, the Bank reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle this litigation for $990 thousand in total. The Bank had a litigation reserve of $990 thousand at December 31, 2019.  The parties submitted a negotiated settlement agreement to the court, and received final court approval on December 19, 2019. On February 29, 2020 the Bank made a payment, which included additional minor expenses, of $1.0 million in final settlement of this matter.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

 

35

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Shares of our common stock trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "MRBK".    As of March 30, 2020, there were approximately 180 registered shareholders of the Corporation's common stock. Certain shares are held in “nominee” or “street” name and accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or included in the foregoing number.

On August 24, 2018, the Corporation acquired the Bank in a merger and reorganization effected under Pennsylvania law and in accordance with the terms of a Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated April 26, 2018 (the “Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Agreement, on August 24, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. all of the outstanding shares of the Bank’s $1.00 par value common stock formerly held by its shareholders was converted into and exchanged for one newly issued share of the Corporation’s par value common stock, and the Bank became a subsidiary of the Corporation. Because the Bank and the Corporation were entities under common control, this exchange of shares between entities under common control resulted in the retrospective combination of the Bank and the Corporation for all periods presented as if the combination had been in effect since inception of common control.

Share Repurchases

The following table presents the repurchasing activity of the Corporation during the fourth quarter of 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Number of

 

Maximum Number

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares Purchased

 

of Shares that May

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

as Part of Publicly

 

Yet Be Purchased

 

    

Total Number of

    

Average Price Paid

    

Announced Plans or

    

Under the Plan or

Period

 

Shares Purchased

 

Per Share

 

Programs

 

Programs

October 1-31, 2019

 

785

 

$

17.76

 

785

 

320,000

November 1-30, 2019

 

1,730

 

 

18.20

 

1,730

 

317,485

December 1-31, 2019

 

860

 

 

19.27

 

860

 

316,625

Total

 

3,375

 

$

18.37

 

3,375

 

316,625

 

Refer to note 25 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of a stock buy-back in March 2020.

Dividend Policy

The Corporation has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock and has no plans at this time to pay cash dividends. 

36

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Selected historical consolidated financial information

The following table should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes and "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," each of which is included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of and for the Years Ended December 31, 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

Selected period End Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

39,371

 

23,952

 

35,506

 

18,872

 

19,159

Investment securities

 

67,636

 

63,169

 

52,867

 

47,552

 

39,739

Loans receivable, gross

 

964,710

 

838,106

 

694,637

 

604,291

 

500,744

Loans held for sale

 

33,704

 

37,695

 

35,024

 

39,573

 

83,684

Allowance for loans losses

 

(9,513)

 

(8,053)

 

(6,709)

 

(5,425)

 

(5,298)

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

 

4,773

 

5,046

 

5,495

 

 —

 

 —

Total assets

 

1,150,019

 

997,480

 

856,035

 

733,693

 

663,344

Interest-bearing deposits

 

711,718

 

625,980

 

526,655

 

431,034

 

430,068

Total deposits

 

851,168

 

752,130

 

627,109

 

527,136

 

490,568

Total liabilities

 

1,029,324

 

887,928

 

754,672

 

663,730

 

610,423

Total Stockholders' equity

 

120,695

 

109,552

 

101,363

 

69,963

 

52,921

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

$

52,863

 

44,064

 

35,720

 

30,980

 

27,981

Interest expense

 

16,527

 

11,407

 

6,782

 

5,192

 

4,590

Net interest income

 

36,336

 

32,657

 

28,938

 

25,788

 

23,391

Provisions for loan losses

 

901

 

1,577

 

2,161

 

1,198

 

1,434

Net interest income after provisions for loan losses

 

35,435

 

31,080

 

26,777

 

24,590

 

21,957

Noninterest income

 

33,098

 

32,355

 

36,700

 

42,844

 

36,121

Noninterest expense

 

55,019

 

52,945

 

57,691

 

59,913

 

48,642

Net income before income taxes

 

13,514

 

10,490

 

5,786

 

7,521

 

9,436

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

3,033

 

2,327

 

2,754

 

2,599

 

3,248

Net income

 

10,481

 

8,163

 

3,032

 

4,922

 

6,188

Preferred stock dividends and net accretion

 

 —

 

 —

 

(1,167)

 

(1,156)

 

(1,099)

Net income available to common stockholders

 

10,481

 

8,163

 

1,865

 

3,767

 

5,089

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Per Share Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share, basic

$

1.64

 

1.28

 

0.50

 

1.12

 

1.91

Earnings per common share, diluted

$

1.63

 

1.27

 

0.49

 

1.11

 

1.88

Book value per common share

$

18.84

 

17.10

 

15.86

 

15.50

 

14.69

Tangible book value per share(1)

$

18.09

 

16.31

 

15.00

 

15.50

 

14.69

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic

 

6,407

 

6,397

 

3,743

 

3,362

 

2,669

Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted

 

6,438

 

6,427

 

3,770

 

3,389

 

2,706

Shares outstanding at the end of period

 

6,405

 

6,407

 

6,392

 

3,685

 

2,773

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Performance Metrics:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average assets (ROAA)

 

1.01%

 

0.90%

 

0.39%

 

0.71%

 

1.02%

Return on average equity (ROAE)

 

9.09%

 

7.77%

 

3.97%

 

7.69%

 

12.78%

Net interest spread

 

3.21%

 

3.44%

 

3.69%

 

3.67%

 

3.83%

Net interest margin (NIM)

 

3.65%

 

3.80%

 

3.93%

 

3.87%

 

3.98%

Efficiency ratio

 

79.24%

 

81.44%

 

87.78%

 

87.30%

 

81.73%

Noninterest income to average assets

 

3.51%

 

3.62%

 

4.69%

 

6.21%

 

5.96%

Noninterest expense to average assets

 

5.31%

 

5.87%

 

7.41%

 

8.68%

 

8.03%

Yield on interest-earning assets

 

5.30%

 

5.14%

 

4.83%

 

4.62%

 

4.74%

Cost of interest-bearing liabilities

 

2.10%

 

1.69%

 

1.16%

 

0.95%

 

0.91%

Yield on loans

 

5.51%

 

5.35%

 

5.10%

 

4.89%

 

4.99%

Cost of deposits

 

1.97%

 

1.54%

 

0.95%

 

0.77%

 

0.71%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Credit Quality Ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperforming assets to total assets

 

0.29%

 

0.39%

 

0.42%

 

0.73%

 

0.63%

Nonperforming loans to total loans

 

0.34%

 

0.45%

 

0.43%

 

0.83%

 

0.68%

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans

 

294.12%

 

204.85%

 

212.51%

 

101.90%

 

133.65%

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

 

0.99%

 

0.96%

 

0.92%

 

0.84%

 

0.91%

Allowance for loan losses to total loans held-for-investment

 

1.00%

 

1.01%

 

0.96%

 

0.90%

 

1.06%

Net charge-offs to average loans

 

(0.06)%

 

0.03%

 

0.13%

 

0.17%

 

0.21%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital Ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 leverage capital ratio

 

14.08%

 

11.16%

 

12.37%

 

9.67%

 

8.39%

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio

 

14.98%

 

11.72%

 

12.86%

 

10.62%

 

9.29%

Total risk-based capital ratio

 

16.09%

 

13.66%

 

15.53%

 

13.51%

 

12.58%

Common equity tier 1 capital ratio

 

14.98%

 

11.72%

 

12.86%

 

8.68%

 

N/A

 

37

Table of Contents

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Recent Market Conditions

Our financial condition and performance, as well as the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, the value of collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services that we offer, are all highly dependent on the business environment in the primary markets in which we operate and in the United States as a whole. During the first quarter of 2020, an outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19), which was originally identified in Wuhan, China, has spread to a number of countries around the world, including the United States. COVID-19 and its associated impacts on trade (including supply chains and export levels), travel, employee productivity and other economic activities have had, are currently having and may for some time continue to have a destabilizing effect on financial markets and economic activity. The extent of the impact of COVID-19 on our operational and financial performance is currently uncertain, cannot be predicted and will depend on certain developments, including, among others, the duration and spread of COVID-19, its impact on our customers, employees and vendors, and governmental, regulatory and private sector responses, which may be precautionary, to the coronavirus.

In light of the changing economic outlook as a result of COVID-19, as well as other factors, including the possibility of an oil price war in March 2020, the 10-year Treasury yield has fallen to historic lows, and the equity markets have been significantly impacted. In response, the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points on March 3, 2020, and then by an additional 100 basis points on March 15, 2020. The assets and liabilities of the Corporation may be significantly impacted by changes in interest rates. The Corporation is currently reviewing actions that it may take in response to these changes in the event that market turmoil continues for an extended period.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting and reporting policies conform to GAAP and conform to general practices within the industry in which we operate.  To prepare financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management makes estimates, assumptions and judgments based on available information.  These estimates, assumptions and judgments affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  These estimates, assumptions and judgements are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements and, as this information changes, actual results could differ from the estimates, assumptions and judgments reflected in the financial statements.  In particular, management has identified the provision and allowance for loan and lease losses as the accounting policy that, due to the estimates, assumptions and judgements inherent in that policy, is critical in understanding our financial statements. Management has presented the application of this policy to the audit committee of our board of directors.

The JOBS Act permits us an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards affecting public companies.  We have elected to take advantage of this extended transition period, which means that the financial statements included in this Annual Report, as well as any financial statements that we file in the future, will not be subject to all new or revised accounting standards generally applicable to public companies for the transition period for so long as we remain an emerging growth company or until we affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period under the JOBS Act.  If we do so, we will prominently disclose this decision in the first periodic report filed with the SEC following our decision, and such decision is irrevocable. 

The following is a discussion of the critical accounting policies and significant estimates that require us to make complex and subjective judgments.  Additional information about these policies can be found in footnote 1 of the Corporations Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. 

Provision and allowance for loan and lease losses

The provision for loan and lease losses reflects the amount required to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses (Allowance) at an appropriate level based upon managements evaluation of the adequacy of general and specific loss reserves. 

38

Table of Contents

The Allowance is maintained at a level that management believes is appropriate to provide for incurred loan and lease losses as of the date of the Consolidated Balance Sheet and we have established methodologies for the determination of its adequacy.  The methodologies are set forth in a formal policy and take into consideration the need for an overall general allowance as well as specific allowances that are determined on an individual loan basis for impaired loans.  We increase our Allowance by charging provisions for losses against our income and decreased by charge‑offs, net of recoveries. 

The evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.  While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans and leases, changes in economic or other conditions may necessitate revision of the estimate in future periods. 

The Allowance is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for probable losses based upon an ongoing review of the originated loan and lease portfolios by portfolio category, which include consideration of actual loss experience, peer loss experience, changes in the size and risk profile of the portfolio, identification of individual problem loan and lease situations which may affect a borrowers ability to repay, and evaluation of prevailing economic conditions.

Results of operations – Years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

Overview

Our reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2019,  was $10.5 million or $1.63 per diluted common share compared to $8.2 million or $1.27 per diluted common share for the same period in 2018.  The $2.3 million increase in net income was attributable to a $4.4 million increase net interest income, a  decrease in the provision for loan losses of $676 thousand, offset somewhat by an increase of $1.3 million in net non-interest expense (non-interest expense less non-interest income).

Net interest income

Our earnings are derived predominantly from net interest income, which is our interest income less interest expense.  Changes in our balance sheet composition, including interest-earning assets, deposits, and borrowings, combined with changes in market interest rates, impact our net interest income. Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. We manage our interest-earning assets and funding sources, including non-interest and interest-bearing liabilities, in order to maximize this margin.  Net interest income increased by $3.7 million, or 11.3%, to $36.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $32.7 million for the same period in 2018. Our net interest margin was 3.65% on a tax equivalent yield basis (“TEY”) for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 3.80% for the same period in 2018.  The decrease in net interest margin, year-over-year, reflects the pressure from rising cost of funds, which outpaced the favorable trend in yield on earning assets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

Table of Contents

 

Average balance sheet, interest and yield/rate analysis.

The following table presents average balance sheet information, interest income, interest expense and the corresponding average yield earned, on a tax equivalent basis, and rates paid for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The average balances are principally daily averages and, for loans, include both performing and nonperforming loans.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 

 

Average

 

Income/

 

Yields/

 

Average

 

Income/

 

Yields/

(dollars in thousands)

    

Balance

    

Expense

    

rates

    

Balance

    

Expense

    

rates

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due from banks

 

$

6,429

 

 

140

 

2.17%

 

$

5,407

 

 

93

 

1.74%

Federal funds sold

 

 

930

 

 

24

 

2.64%

 

 

1,344

 

 

29

 

2.14%

Investment securities(1)

 

 

62,900

 

 

1,642

 

2.61%

 

 

55,945

 

 

1,347

 

2.41%

Loans held for sale

 

 

28,980

 

 

1,164

 

4.01%

 

 

30,209

 

 

1,362

 

4.92%

Loans held for investment(1)

 

 

898,810

 

 

49,973

 

5.53%

 

 

769,021

 

 

41,342

 

5.37%

Total loans

 

 

927,790

 

 

51,137

 

5.51%

 

 

799,230

 

 

42,704

 

5.35%

Total interest-earning assets

 

 

998,049

 

 

52,943

 

5.30%

 

 

861,926

 

 

44,173

 

5.14%

Noninterest earning assets

 

 

38,320

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,683

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

1,036,369

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

902,609

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

$

92,695

 

 

1,461

 

1.57%

 

$

105,718

 

 

1,256

 

1.19%

Money market and savings deposits

 

 

303,463

 

 

5,239

 

1.73%

 

 

239,568

 

 

3,390

 

1.41%

Time deposits

 

 

310,293

 

 

7,207

 

2.32%

 

 

254,161

 

 

4,581

 

1.80%

Total deposits

 

 

706,451

 

 

13,907

 

1.97%

 

 

599,447

 

 

9,227

 

1.54%

Short-term borrowings

 

 

68,059

 

 

1,696

 

2.49%

 

 

58,172

 

 

1,285

 

2.21%

Long-term borrowings

 

 

2,328

 

 

71

 

3.06%

 

 

7,418

 

 

201

 

2.71%

Total Borrowings

 

 

70,387

 

 

1,767

 

2.51%

 

 

65,590

 

 

1,486

 

2.27%

Subordinated Debentures

 

 

10,704

 

 

853

 

7.96%

 

 

9,469

 

 

694

 

7.32%

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

787,542

 

 

16,527

 

2.10%

 

 

674,506

 

 

11,407

 

1.69%

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 

 

126,001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

116,644

 

 

 

 

 

Other noninterest-bearing liabilities

 

 

7,570

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,440

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

$

921,113

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

797,590

 

 

 

 

 

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

115,256

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

105,019

 

 

 

 

 

Total stockholders' equity and liabilities

 

$

1,036,369

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

902,609

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

 

 

 

$

36,416

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

32,766

 

 

Net interest spread

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.21%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.44%

Net interest margin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.65%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.80%

 

(1)

Yields and net interest income are reflected on a tax-equivalent basis.

 

Rate/Volume Analysis

During 2019, net  interest income increased $3.7 million or 11.3% on a tax equivalent basis. As shown in the following Rate/Volume Analysis table, this increase was primarily attributable to volume changes.  Volume related changes contributed $5.3 million towards interest income which was partially offset by unfavorable changes in rate of $1.6 million.

The favorable change in net interest income due to volume changes was driven largely from growth in total loans, which increased $128.6 million on average.  This increase contributed $7.3 million to interest income. Total investment securities, cash and cash equivalents increased $7.6 million on average combined, contributing $186 thousand to interest income.  On the funding side, interest checking and money market accounts together rose $50.9 million on average during the year,  

40

Table of Contents

reducing net interest income by $836 thousand.  Time deposits increased $56.1 million on average year over year, causing an unfavorable change of $1.1 million to net interest income.  Average borrowings increased $4.8 million and had an unfavorable impact of $83 thousand on net interest income, while moderately higher level of average subordinated debt contributed $95 thousand unfavorably to net interest income.

The unfavorable change in net interest income due to rate changes was driven largely from the increase in cost of funds, particularly from wholesale funding such as borrowings and time deposits, which rose 24 and 52 basis points, respectively. Cost of funds for core deposits, such as interest checking and money market accounts, rose 38 and 32 basis points, respectively.  These unfavorable rate changes reduced net interest income $3.0 million, but were partially offset by favorable rate changes in interest-earning assets which increased net interest income $1.3 million.  The favorable change due to rate earned on loans was $1.2 million resulting from a 16 basis point increase on average for the total portfolio.  The favorable change due to rate earned on cash and investments was $151 thousand, resulting from a 23 basis point increase in the yields.

The following table sets forth, among other things, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected interest income and expense for the periods noted (tax-exempt yields have been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis using a 22% tax rate). For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes attributable to (i) changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by old volume) and (ii) changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by new rate). The net change attributable to the combined impact of rate and volume has been allocated proportionately to the change due to rate and the change due to volume.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 Compared to 2018

 

Change in interest due to:

(dollars in thousands)

Rate

    

Volume

    

Total

Interest income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due from banks

$

27

 

20

 

47

Federal funds sold

 

 6

 

(11)

 

(5)

Investment securities(1)

 

118

 

177

 

295

Loans held for sale

 

(162)

 

(36)

 

(198)

Loans held for investment(1)

 

1,315

 

7,316

 

8,631

Total loans

 

1,153

 

7,280

 

8,433

Total interest income

$

1,304

 

7,466

 

8,770

Interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest checking

$

373

 

(168)

 

205

Money market and savings deposits

 

845

 

1,004

 

1,849

Time deposits

 

1,492

 

1,134

 

2,626

Total interest-bearing deposits

 

2,710

 

1,970

 

4,680

Short-term borrowings

 

175

 

236

 

411

Long-term borrowings

 

23

 

(153)

 

(130)

Total borrowings

 

198

 

83

 

281

Subordinated debentures

 

64

 

95

 

159

Total interest expense

 

2,972

 

2,148

 

5,120

Interest differential

$

(1,668)

 

5,318

 

3,650

(1)

Yields and net interest income are reflected on a tax-equivalent basis.

 

Provision for loan losses

We recorded a provision for loan losses of $901 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019, down $676 thousand from $1.6 million for the same period in 2018. The decreased provision for 2019 is due to continued strong asset quality and net recoveries of $559 thousand, compared to net charge-offs of $233 thousand for the same period in 2018.  

41

Table of Contents

Non-interest income

Non-interest income increased $743 thousand, or 2.3%, to $33.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $32.4 million for the prior year.  The increase was mainly the result of $1.4 million in SBA income recognized on the sales of SBA loans for the year ended December 31, 2019.  There were no SBA loan sales in the prior year. Mortgage revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $26.2 million, relatively unchanged from the same period in 2018. In addition, fair value gains were $489 thousand for the twelve months of 2019, compared to fair value losses of $368 thousand for the twelve months in 2018. 

For the twelve month period of 2019, wealth management revenue was down $293 thousand to $3.6 million reflecting the market value changes in assets under management largely from the first quarter. Included in other non-interest income is fee income as well as hedging gains and losses.  Fee income was $1.6 million for the full year of 2019 compared to $1.6 million for the same period in 2018.  Fee income is comprised mainly of FHLB stock dividend income, wire transfer fee income, title fee income, as well as various other less significant income sources.  Hedging losses were $816 thousand for the full year of 2019 compared to hedging gains of $627 thousand for the same period in 2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Non-interest income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage banking income

 

$

26,167

 

 

26,187

Wealth management income

 

 

3,624

 

 

3,917

SBA loan income

 

 

1,448

 

 

 —

Earnings on investment in life insurance

 

 

290

 

 

300

  Net change in the fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

111

 

 

(161)

Net change in the fair value of loans held-for-sale

 

 

(13)

 

 

 7

Net change in the fair value of loans held-for-investment

 

 

391

 

 

(214)

Gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale

 

 

165

 

 

 —

Service charges

 

 

110

 

 

115

Other

 

 

805

 

 

2,204

Total non-interest income

 

$

33,098

 

 

32,355

 

Non-interest expense

Non-interest expenses increased $2.1 million, or 3.9%, to $55.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $52.9 million in 2018. This increase was mainly attributable to an increase of $452 thousand, or 20.9%, in professional fees for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same periods in 2018.  The higher professional fees were due largely to legal and accounting fees incurred as part of the Maryland mortgage licensing issue in the first quarter, in addition to legal fees incurred related to the litigation matter discussed below. 

Other non-interest expenses increased $1.2 million, or 29.6%, to $5.1 million when compared to the prior year period. The settlement of the outstanding litigation matter contributed $790 thousand to other non-interest expense, along with $79 thousand of other expense incurred for the previously disclosed Maryland mortgage licensing issue.  Increases in the PA shares tax assessment and FDIC insurance due to the growth of the Bank also contributed to higher other non-interest expenses during the year-to-date period, from the same period in the prior year.

42

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Non-interest expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

$

35,157

 

 

34,794

Occupancy and equipment

 

 

3,806

 

 

3,779

Loan expenses

 

 

2,579

 

 

2,643

Professional fees

 

 

2,614

 

 

2,162

Advertising and promotion

 

 

2,475

 

 

2,355

Data processing

 

 

1,327

 

 

1,261

Information Technology

 

 

1,256

 

 

1,107

Communications

 

 

675

 

 

886

Other

 

 

5,130

 

 

3,958

Total non-interest expenses

 

$

55,019

 

 

52,945

 

Income tax expense

Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $3.0 million as compared to $2.3 million for the same period in 2018. The effective tax rates for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were 22.4% and 22.1%, respectively. For more information related to income taxes, refer to footnote 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Balance Sheet Summary

Assets

As of December 31, 2019, total assets were $1.2 billion compared with $997.5 million as of December 31, 2018. Total assets increased $152.5 million, or 15.3%, on a year-over-year basis.  

This growth was concentrated in our loan portfolio, excluding mortgage loans held for sale, which increased by $126.6 million, or 15.1%, year-over-year. Investment securities and cash decreased $20.9 million, or 24.0%, year-over-year. Our overall asset growth was funded largely by an increase in deposits of $99.0 million, or 13.2%, to $851.2 million at December 31, 2019 from $752.1 million at December 31, 2018.  Increases in borrowings of $6.3 million, or 5.2% year-over-year, as well as an increase of $31.7 million or 343.4% in subordinated debt, also helped to fund the growth in our loan portfolio.

Loans

Our loan portfolio is the largest category of our interest-earning assets. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, our total loans amounted to $998.4 million and $875.8 million, respectively. Our loan portfolio is comprised of loans originated to be held in portfolio, as well as residential mortgage loans originated for sale.  Meridian engages in the origination of residential mortgages, most typically for 1‑4 family dwellings, with the intention of the Corporation to principally sell substantially all of these loans in the secondary market to qualified investors.  Our loans held in portfolio are originated by our commercial and consumer loan divisions. We have a strong credit culture that promotes diversity of lending products with a focus on commercial businesses.  We have no particular credit concentration.  Our commercial loans have been proactively managed in an effort to achieve a balanced portfolio with no unusual exposure to one industry.  Loans held for investment increased $126.6 million, or 15.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2019.

43

Table of Contents

Loans and leases outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are detailed by category as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

% of

    

 

    

% of

(dollars in thousands)

 

2019

 

Portfolio

 

2018

 

Portfolio

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

$

33,704

 

3.4%

 

37,695

 

4.3%

Real estate loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

 

362,590

 

36.3%

 

325,393

 

37.1%

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

81,583

 

8.2%

 

82,286

 

9.4%

Residential mortgage

 

 

53,665

 

5.4%

 

53,360

 

6.1%

Construction

 

 

172,044

 

17.2%

 

116,906

 

13.3%

                                                  Total real estate loans

 

 

669,882

 

67.0%

 

577,945

 

65.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

273,301

 

27.3%

 

254,050

 

29.0%

Small business loans

 

 

21,616

 

2.2%

 

5,756

 

0.7%

Consumer

 

 

1,003

 

0.1%

 

701

 

0.1%

Leases, net

 

 

697

 

0.1%

 

1,335

 

0.1%

                                                  Total portfolio loans and leases

 

 

966,499

 

96.6%

 

839,787

 

95.7%

                                                  Total loans and leases

 

$

1,000,203

 

100.0%

 

877,482

 

100.0%

 

Commercial loans, commercial construction loans and commercial real estate loans increased a combined $111.6 million, or 16.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2019.  The growth in the commercial portfolios continues to reflect the work of our strategically expanded lending team as well as strong local market conditions.

Commercial real estate loans. Our commercial real estate loans are secured by real estate that is both owner-occupied and investor owned. Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans generally involve less risk than an investment property and are distinctly reported from non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans for measuring loan concentrations for regulatory purposes. Our owner-occupied commercial real estate loans are originated and managed within our commercial loan department and comprised 37% of our total commercial real estate loan portfolio at December 31, 2019. The remaining commercial real estate loans are managed by our commercial real estate department which offer the following commercial real estate products:

·

Permanent – Investor Real Estate Loans

o

Purchase and refinance loan opportunities for a number of product types, including single-family rentals, multi-family residential as well as tenanted income producing properties in a variety of real estate types, including office, retail, industrial, and flex space

·

Construction Loans

o

Residential construction loans to finance new construction and renovation of single and 1‑4 family homes located within our market area

o

Commercial construction loans for investment properties, generally with semi-permanent attributes

o

Construction loans for new, expanded or renovated operations for our owner occupied business clients

·

Land Development Loans

o

Meridian considers a limited number of strictly land development oriented loans based upon the risk, merit of the future project and strength of the borrower/guarantor relationship

Our commercial real estate loans increased by $37.2 million, or 11.4%, to $362.6 million at December 31, 2019 from $325.4 million at December 31, 2018. Our total commercial real estate loan portfolio represented 36.3% and 37.1% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

44

Table of Contents

Commercial and Industrial Loans

We provide a variety of variable and fixed rate commercial business loans and lines of credit.  These loans and lines of credit are made to small and medium-sized manufacturers and wholesale, retail and service-related businesses. Additionally, we lend to companies in the technology, healthcare, real estate and financial service industries. Commercial business loans generally include lines of credit and term loans with a maturity of five years or less. The primary source of repayment for commercial business loans is generally operating cash flows of the business and may also include collateralization of inventory, accounts receivable, equipment and/or personal guarantees. Our commercial loans increased by $19.3 million, or 7.6%, to $273.3 million at December 31, 2019 from $254.0 million at December 31, 2018.  The total commercial portfolio represented 27.3% and 29.0% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Small Business Loans

We provide financing to small businesses in various industries that include guarantees under the Small Business Administrations (SBA’s) loan programs.  Our small business loans increased by $15.9 million, or 275.5%, to $21.6 million at December 31, 2019 from $5.8 million at December 31, 2018. The small business loans portfolio represented 2.2% and 0.7% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Residential loans

Our residential loans held in portfolio are primarily secured by single-family homes located in our market areas. Our loan pipeline is fed via our mortgage loan production offices (“LPOs”)  and through relationships with commercial lending and through relationships with sales brokers and agents who actively refer clients to Meridian.   The balance of residential loans in portfolio increased $305 thousand, or 0.6%, to $53.7 million at December 31, 2019 from $53.4 million at December 31, 2018. The total residential loan portfolio represented 5.4% and 6.1% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Consumer and Personal Loans

Our consumer-lending department principally originates home equity based products for our clients and prospects.  These loans typically fund completely at closing.  Additional products include smaller dollar personal loans and our newly introduced student loan refinance product, designed to provide additional flexibility in repayment terms desired in the marketplace.  Our consumer credit products include home equity lines and loans, personal lines and loans, and student loan refinancing. The total consumer loan portfolio represented 0.1% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Investments

Our securities portfolio is used to make various term investments, maintain a source of liquidity and serve as collateral for certain types of deposits and borrowings. We manage our investment portfolio according to written investment policies approved by our board of directors. Investments in our securities portfolio may change over time based on our funding needs and interest rate risk management objectives. Our liquidity levels take into account anticipated future cash flows and other available sources of funds and are maintained at levels that we believe are appropriate to provide the necessary flexibility to meet our anticipated funding requirements.

As of December 31, 2019 the fair value of our investment portfolio totaled $68.9 million, with an effective tax equivalent yield of 2.65% and an estimated duration of approximately 3.64 years. The majority of our investment portfolio, or 59.1%, consists of residential mortgage‑backed securities, along with 22.2% in municipal securities.  The remainder of our securities portfolio is invested in U.S. Treasuries and other securities.  We regularly evaluate the composition of our

45

Table of Contents

investment portfolio as the interest rate yield curve changes and may sell investment securities from time to time to adjust our exposure to interest rates or to provide liquidity to meet loan demand.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

unrealized

 

unrealized

 

Fair

(dollars in thousands)

    

cost

    

gains

    

losses

    

value

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. asset backed securities

 

$

11,967

 

— 

 

(101)

 

11,866

U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities

 

 

5,457

 

66

 

(26)

 

5,497

U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

35,096

 

300

 

(173)

 

35,223

State and municipal securities

 

 

6,354

 

 —

 

(84)

 

6,270

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

58,874

 

366

 

(384)

 

58,856

Securities held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and municipal securities

 

 

8,780

 

223

 

 —

 

9,003

Total securities held-to-maturity

 

$

8,780

 

223

 

 —

 

9,003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

unrealized

 

unrealized

 

Fair

(dollars in thousands)

    

cost

    

gains

    

losses

    

value

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities

 

$

24,092

 

45

 

(271)

 

23,866

U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

14,754

 

52

 

(142)

 

14,664

State and municipal securities

 

 

11,096

 

22

 

(199)

 

10,919

Investments in mutual funds

 

 

1,000

 

 —

 

(21)

 

979

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

50,942

 

119

 

(633)

 

50,428

Securities held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

$

1,991

 

 —

 

(13)

 

1,978

State and municipal securities

 

 

10,750

 

17

 

(90)

 

10,677

Total securities held-to-maturity

 

$

12,741

 

17

 

(103)

 

12,655

 

 

Asset Quality Summary

As of December 31, 2019, total nonperforming loans and leases decreased by $696 thousand to $3.2 million, representing 0.34% of loans and leases held-for-investment, compared to $3.9 million, or 0.48% of loans and leases held-for-investment as of December 31, 2018. The decrease to nonperforming loans resulted from a decrease of $491 thousand in commercial mortgage loans,  and a decrease of $56 thousand in commercial and industrial loans. Nonperforming residential mortgage loans decreased $603 thousand as well but were offset by a $454 thousand increase in nonperforming home equity loans from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019. 

As of December 31, 2019, the allowance of $9.5 million represented 1.00% of loans and leases held-for-investment (excluding loans at fair value),  compared to 0.97% as of December 31, 2018. The allowance to non-performing loans increased from 204.85% as of December 31, 2018 to 294.12% as of December 31, 2019.

During 2019 one residential mortgage loan was foreclosed on and the property was recorded within other real estate owned (“OREO”) in the balance sheet at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell of $120 thousand. 

As of December 31, 2019, the Corporation had $3.9 million of troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), of which $3.6 million were in compliance with the modified terms and excluded from non-performing loans and leases. As of December 31, 2018, the Corporation had $4.3 million of TDRs, of which $3.1 million were in compliance with the modified terms, and were excluded from non-performing loans and leases.

46

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2019, the Corporation had a recorded investment of $7.3 million of impaired loans and leases which included $3.9 million of TDRs. Impaired loans and leases are those for which it is probable that the Corporation will not be able to collect all scheduled principal and interest in accordance with the original terms of the loans and leases. Impaired loans and leases as of December 31, 2018 totaled $5.8 million, which included $4.3 million of TDRs. Refer to footnote 6 in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding the Corporation’s impaired loans and leases.

The Corporation continues to be diligent in its credit underwriting process and proactive with its loan review process, including the engagement of the services of an independent outside loan review firm, which helps identify developing credit issues. Proactive steps that are taken include the procurement of additional collateral (preferably outside the current loan structure) whenever possible and frequent contact with the borrower. The Corporation believes that timely identification of credit issues and appropriate actions early in the process serve to mitigate overall risk of loss.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Non-performing assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

$

733

 

 

1,224

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

537

 

 

83

Residential mortgage

 

 

1,544

 

 

2,147

Total real estate loans

 

$

2,814

 

 

3,454

Commercial and industrial

 

 

421

 

 

477

Total nonaccrual loans

 

$

3,235

 

 

3,931

Other real estate owned

 

 

120

 

 

 —

Total non-performing loans

 

$

3,235

 

 

3,931

Total non-performing assets

 

$

3,355

 

 

3,931

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Troubled debt restructurings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

TDRs included in non-performing loans

 

 

319

 

 

1,219

TDRs in compliance with modified terms

 

 

3,599

 

 

3,047

Total TDRs

 

$

3,918

 

 

4,266

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset quality ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-performing assets to total assets

 

 

0.29%

 

 

0.39%

Non-performing loans to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

 

0.32%

 

 

0.45%

Total loans held-for-investment (excluding loans at fair value)

 

 

0.34%

 

 

0.48%

Allowance for loan losses to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

 

0.95%

 

 

0.92%

Total loans held-for-investment (excluding loans at fair value)

 

 

1.00%

 

 

0.97%

Non-performing loans  

 

 

294.12%

 

 

204.85%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and leases

 

$

998,414

 

 

875,801

Total loans and leases held-for-investment

 

$

964,710

 

 

838,106

Total loans and leases held-for-investment (excluding loans at fair value)

 

$

954,164

 

 

826,684

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

$

9,513

 

 

8,053

 

Deposits and Equity

Deposits increased $99.0 million, or 13.2%, to $851.2 million at December 31, 2019 from $752.1 million at December 31, 2018. This growth year-over-year was across all deposit categories except for interest-bearing demand deposits.  Non-maturity deposits, consisting of demand deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts and regular savings accounts

47

Table of Contents

increased $65.9 million, or 13.9%. Certificates of deposit increased $33.1 million, or 11.9%. Core funding continues to be a strategic initiative and the deposit growth for the fourth quarter resulted from our expanded business development team as well as the efforts from all sales personnel in our branch markets.

The following table summarizes our deposit balances and weighted average rate paid for the periods presented.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

average

 

Percent of

 

Average

 

average

 

Percent of

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

amount

    

rate paid

    

total deposits

    

amount

    

rate paid

    

total deposits

 

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 

$

126,002

 

 —

 

15.14%

 

$

116,644

 

 —

 

16.29

%

Interest-bearing deposits

 

 

396,158

 

1.69%

 

47.59%

 

 

345,286

 

1.35%

 

48.22

%

Time deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Under $100,000

 

 

19,597

 

2.34%

 

2.35%

 

 

18,854

 

1.64%

 

2.63

%

$100,000 and greater

 

 

290,696

 

2.32%

 

34.92%

 

 

235,307

 

1.82%

 

32.86

%

Total

 

$

832,453

 

1.97%

 

100.00%

 

$

716,091

 

1.54%

%  

100.00

%

 

Total equity increased $11.1 million, or 10.2%, to $120.7 million at December 31, 2019 from $109.6 million at December 31, 2018. This increase was attributable to net income recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019.  

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management maintains liquidity to meet depositors’ needs for funds, to satisfy or fund loan commitments, and for other operating purposes.  Meridian’s foundation for liquidity is a stable and loyal customer deposit base, cash and cash equivalents, a marketable investment portfolio that provides periodic cash flow through regular maturities and amortization, or that can be used as collateral to secure funding.  In addition, as part of its liquidity management, Meridian maintains a segment of commercial loan assets that are comprised of SNCs which have a national market and can be sold in a timely manner.  Meridian’s primary liquidity, which totaled $161.5 million at December 31, 2019 compared to $136.6  million at December 31,  2018, includes investments, SNCs, federal funds sold, mortgages held-for-sale and cash and cash equivalents, less the amount of securities required to be pledged for certain liabilities.  Meridian also anticipates scheduled payments and prepayments on its loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolios.

In addition, Meridian maintains borrowing arrangements with various correspondent banks, the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia to meet short-term liquidity needs.  Through these relationships, Meridian had available credit of approximately $8.5 million at December 31, 2019.  As a member of the FHLB, we are eligible to borrow up to a specific credit limit which is determined by the amount of our residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and other loans that have been pledged as collateral.  As of December 31, 2019, Meridian’s maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB was $507.3 million.  At December 31, 2019, Meridian had borrowed $126.8 million and the FHLB had issued letters of credit, on Meridian’s behalf, totaling $102.8 million against its available credit lines.  At December 31, 2019, Meridian also had available $39.0 million of unsecured federal funds lines of credit with other financial institutions as well as $161.6 million of available short or long term funding through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) program and $45.3 million of available short or long term funding through brokered CD arrangements.  Management believes that Meridian has adequate resources to meet its short-term and long-term funding requirements.

At December 31, 2019, Meridian had $327.8 million in unfunded loan commitments.  Management anticipates these commitments will be funded by means of normal cash flows.  Certificates of deposit greater than or equal to $250 thousand scheduled to mature in one year or less from December 31, 2019 totaled $243.3 million. Management believes that the majority of such deposits will be reinvested with Meridian and that certificates that are not renewed will be funded by a reduction in cash and cash equivalents or by pay-downs and maturities of loans and investments. At December 31, 2019, Meridian had a reserve for unfunded loan commitments of $47 thousand. 

Meridian meets the definition of “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes on December 31, 2019.  Our capital category is determined for the purposes of applying the bank regulators’ “prompt corrective action” regulations and for determining levels of deposit insurance assessments and may not constitute an accurate representation of Meridian’s overall financial condition or prospects.

48

Table of Contents

Under federal banking laws and regulations, Meridian is required to maintain minimum capital as determined by certain regulatory ratios.  Capital adequacy for regulatory purposes, and the capital category assigned to an institution by its regulators, may be determinative of an institution’s overall financial condition.  Under the final capital rules that became effective on January 1, 2015, there was a requirement for a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets which is in addition to the other minimum risk-based capital standards in the rule.  Institutions that do not maintain this required capital buffer will become subject to progressively more stringent limitations on the percentage of earnings that can be paid out in dividends or used for stock repurchases and on the payment of discretionary bonuses to senior executive management.  The capital conservation buffer has been phased in over a  four year period, which began on January 1, 2016, as follows: the maximum buffer was 0.625% of risk-weighted assets for 2016, 1.25% for 2018 and 1.875% for 2018, and effective as of January 1, 2019, the capital conservation buffer is fully phased in at 2.5%.

The following table summarizes data and ratios pertaining to our capital structure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be well capitalized under

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For capital adequacy

 

prompt corrective action

 

 

 

Actual

 

purposes *

 

provisions

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

 

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

$

166,471

 

16.10%

 

$

108,576

 

10.50%

 

$

103,405

 

10.00%

 

Bank

 

 

166,360

 

16.09%

 

 

108,571

 

10.50%

 

 

103,401

 

10.00%

 

Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

 

115,934

 

11.21%

 

 

72,384

 

7.00%

 

 

67,214

 

6.50%

 

Bank

 

 

154,881

 

14.98%

 

 

72,381

 

7.00%

 

 

67,211

 

6.50%

 

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

 

115,934

 

11.21%

 

 

87,895

 

8.50%

 

 

82,724

 

8.00%

 

Bank

 

 

154,881

 

14.98%

 

 

87,891

 

8.50%

 

 

82,721

 

8.00%

 

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

 

115,934

 

10.55%

 

 

43,973

 

4.00%

 

 

54,966

 

5.00%

 

Bank

 

 

154,881

 

14.08%

 

 

44,013

 

4.00%

 

 

55,017

 

5.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018 - as revised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be well capitalized under

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For capital adequacy

 

prompt corrective action

 

 

 

Actual

 

purposes *

 

provisions

 

(dollars in thousands):

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

 

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

122,262

 

13.66%

 

$

71,585

 

8.00%

 

$

89,481

 

10.00%

 

Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.72%

 

 

40,266

 

4.50%

 

 

58,163

 

6.50%

 

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.72%

 

 

53,689

 

6.00%

 

 

71,585

 

8.00%

 

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.16%

 

 

37,581

 

4.00%

 

 

46,977

 

5.00%

 

 


*     Does not include capital conservation buffer of 1.250% for 2019 and 1.875% for 2018

49

Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our primary market risk is interest rate risk, which is defined as the risk of loss of net interest income or net interest margin because of changes in interest rates.

Asset/Liability Management

As a financial institution, one of our primary market risks is interest rate volatility.  Changes in market interest rates, whether they are increases or decreases, can  trigger repricing and changes in the pace of payments for  both assets and liabilities (prepayment risk), which individually or in combination may  affect our  net income, net interest income and net interest margin, either positively or negatively.  In recognition of this, we actively manage our assets and liabilities to minimize the impact of changing interest rates on our net interest margin and maximize our net interest income and the return on equity, while maintaining adequate liquidity and capital.

Our board of directors has established a Board Risk Committee that, among other duties, sets broad asset and liability management policy (“ALM” policy) and directives for asset/liability management, as well as establishes review and control procedures to ensure adherence to this policy.  The board of directors has delegated authority for the development and implementation of all asset and liability management policies, procedures, and strategies to the Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”).  ALCO is comprised of various members of senior management responsible for interpreting the longer range objectives established by the board of directors.  As such ALCO sets basic direction for the Corporation’s sources and uses of funds, establishes numerical ranges for primary and secondary objectives, monitors risk and the delivery of services, establishes subs to manage specific ALM activities, and monitors the counterparties engaged in ALM activities.  Our ALM policy is reviewed by at least annually, which includes an evaluation of the ALM policy limits and guidelines in light of our risk profile, business strategies, regulatory guidelines and overall market conditions.

As part of our management of interest rate risk, we utilize the following modeling techniques that simulate the effects of variations in interest rates:  (1) repricing gap analysis; (2) net interest income simulation; and (3) economic value of equity simulation.  These models require that we use various assumptions, including asset and liability pricing responses, asset and liability new business, repayment and redemption responses, behavior of imbedded options and sensitivity of relationships across different rate indexes and product types.  These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the models cannot precisely predict the fluctuations in market interest rates or precisely measure the impact of future changes in interest rates.  Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies.

Gap analysis.  Management measures and evaluates the potential effects of interest rate movements on earnings through an interest rate sensitivity “gap” analysis.  Given the size and turnover rate of the originated mortgage loans held for sale, loans held for sale are treated as having a maturity of 12 months or less.  Interest rate sensitivity reflects the potential effect on net interest income when there is movement in interest rates.  An institution is considered to be asset sensitive, or having a positive gap, when the amount of its interest-earning assets reprices within a given period exceeds the amount of its interest-bearing liabilities also repricing within that time period.  Conversely, an institution is considered to be liability sensitive, or having a negative gap, when the amount of its interest-bearing liabilities reprices within a given period exceeds the amount of its interest-earning assets also within that time period.  During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to decrease net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to increase net interest income.  During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to decrease net interest income.

50

Table of Contents

The following table presents the interest rate gap analysis of our assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greater 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Than 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 years and

 

 

As of December 31, 2019

 

12 Months

 

 

 

 

 

 Not Rate 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

or Less

    

1-2 Years

    

2-5 Years

    

Sensitive

    

Total

Cash and investments

 

$

66,856

 

3,064

 

13,106

 

24,990

 

108,016

Loans, net (1)

 

 

558,813

 

155,846

 

232,924

 

41,318

 

988,901

Other Assets

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

53,102

 

53,102

Total Assets

 

$

625,669

 

158,910

 

246,030

 

119,410

 

1,150,019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 

 

13,271

 

9,952

 

21,833

 

94,394

 

139,450

Interest-bearing deposits

 

 

399,888

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

399,888

Time deposits

 

 

272,331

 

16,532

 

22,967

 

 —

 

311,830

Borrowings

 

 

123,676

 

3,123

 

 —

 

 —

 

126,799

Other Liabilities

 

 

39,878

 

 —

 

225

 

11,254

 

51,357

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

120,695

 

120,695

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 

$

849,044

 

29,607

 

45,025

 

226,343

 

1,150,019

Repricing gap-positive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Negative) Positive

 

$

(223,375)

 

129,303

 

201,005

 

(106,933)

 

 —

Cumulative repricing gap: Dollar amount

 

$

(223,375)

 

(94,072)

 

106,933

 

 —

 

 

Percent of total assets

 

 

(19.4)%

 

(8.2)%

 

9.3%

 

 —

 

 


(1)

Loans include portfolio loans and loans held-for-sale

Under the repricing gap analysis, we are liability-sensitive for maturity/repricing 2 years or less.  This reflects management’s shift in focus to short term time deposits and borrowings in a falling rate environment.

The gap results presented could vary substantially if different assumptions are used or if actual experience differs from the assumptions used in the preparation of the gap analysis.  Furthermore, the gap analysis provides a static view of interest rate risk exposure at a specific point in time and offers only an approximate estimate of the relative sensitivity of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to changes in market interest rates.  In addition, the impact of certain optionality is embedded in our balance sheet such as contractual caps and floors, and trends in asset and liability growth.  Accordingly, we combine the use of gap analysis with the use of an earnings simulation model that provides a dynamic assessment of interest rate sensitivity.

Simulations of net interest income.  We use a simulation model on a quarterly basis to measure and evaluate potential changes in our net interest income resulting from various hypothetical interest rate scenarios.  Our model incorporates various assumptions that management believes to be reasonable, but which may have a significant impact on results such as:

·

The timing of changes in interest rates;

·

Shifts or rotations in the yield curve;

·

Repricing characteristics for market rate sensitive instruments on the balance sheet;

·

Differing sensitivities of financial instruments due to differing underlying rate indices;

·

Varying timing of loan prepayments for different interest rate scenarios;

·

The effect of interest rate floors, periodic loan caps and lifetime loan caps;

·

Overall growth rates and product mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Because of the limitations inherent in any approach used to measure interest rate risk, simulated results are not intended to be used as a forecast of the actual effect of a change in market interest rates on our results, but rather as a means to better plan and execute appropriate ALM strategies.

51

Table of Contents

Potential changes to our net interest income between a flat interest rate scenario and hypothetical rising and declining interest rate scenarios, measured over a one-year period as of December 31, 2019 and 2018  are presented in the following table.  The simulation assumes rate shifts occur upward and downward on the yield curve in even increments over the first twelve months (ramp), followed by rates held constant thereafter.

Rate Ramp: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated increase

 

 

 

(decrease) in Net Interest

 

 

 

Income

 

 

 

For the year ending

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

Changes in Market Interest Rates

    

2019

    

2018

 

+300 basis points over next 12 months

 

0.4

%  

(1.2)

%

+200 basis points over next 12 months

 

0.6

%  

(0.7)

%

+100 basis points over next 12 months

 

0.4

%  

(0.3)

%

No Change

 

  

 

  

 

-100 basis points over next 12 months

 

(0.6)

%

(0.2)

%

-200 basis points over next 12 months

 

(2.3)

%

(0.5)

%

 

The above interest rate simulation suggests that the Corporation’s balance sheet is asset sensitive as of December 31, 2019 and liability sensitive as of December 31, 2018.  Read in conjunction with our gap analysis, you can see that although 19.4% more liability balances reprice in the short term, the spread is high enough to continue to improve earnings in a rising rate environment.  However in a falling rate environment the scenario implies that net interest income will be negatively affected by up to 2.3%.  

Simulation of economic value of equity.  To quantify the amount of capital required to absorb potential losses in value of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities resulting from adverse market movements, we calculate economic value of equity on a quarterly basis.  We define economic value of equity as the net present value of our balance sheet’s cash flow, and we calculate economic value of equity by discounting anticipated principal and interest cash flows under the prevailing and hypothetical interest rate environments.  Potential changes to our economic value of equity between a flat rate scenario and hypothetical rising and declining rate scenarios, measured as of December 31,  2019 and 2018, are presented in the following table.  The projections assume shifts ramp upward and downward of the yield curve of 100, 200 and 300 basis points occurring immediately. We would note that in a downward parallel shift of the yield curve, interest rates at the short-end of the yield curve are not modeled to decline any further than to 0%.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated increase (decrease) in Net

 

 

 

Economic Value at December 31, 

 

Changes in Market Interest Rates

    

2019

 

2018

 

+300 basis points

 

13

%  

 7

%  

+200 basis points

 

11

%  

 7

%  

+100 basis points

 

 7

%  

 5

%  

No Change

 

  

 

  

 

-100 basis points

 

(12)

%

(10)

%

-200 basis points

 

(32)

%

(27)

%

 

This economic value of equity profile at December 31, 2019 suggests that we would experience a positive effect from an initial increase in rates, and that the impact would become greater as rates continue to rise due to the duration of our interest-earning assets and conversely we would experience a negative effect from an initial decrease in rates.  While an instantaneous shift in interest rates is used in this analysis to provide an estimate of exposure, we believe that a gradual shift in interest rates would have a much more modest impact.  Since economic value of equity measures the discounted present value of cash flows over the estimated lives of instruments, the change in economic value of equity does not directly correlate to the degree that earnings would be impacted over a shorter time horizon.

52

Table of Contents

The results of our net interest income and economic value of equity simulation analysis are purely hypothetical, and a variety of factors might cause actual results to differ substantially from what is depicted.  For example, if the timing and magnitude of interest rate changes differ from that projected, our net interest income might vary significantly.  Non-parallel yield curve shifts or changes in interest rate spreads would also cause our net interest income to be different from that projected.  An increasing interest rate environment could reduce projected net interest income if deposits and other short-term interest-bearing liabilities reprice faster than expected or faster than our interest-earning assets.  Actual results could differ from those projected if we grow interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities faster or slower than estimated, or otherwise change its mix of products.  Actual results could also differ from those projected if we experience substantially different repayment speeds in our loan portfolio than those assumed in the simulation model.  Furthermore, the results do not take into account the impact of changes in loan prepayment rates on loan discount accretion.  If prepayment rates were to increase on our loans, we would recognize any remaining loan discounts into interest income.  This would result in a current period offset to declining net interest income caused by higher rate loans prepaying.

Finally, these simulation results do not contemplate all the actions that we may undertake in response to changes in interest rates, such as changes to our loan, investment, deposit, funding or other strategies.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The consolidated financial statements are set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K as follows:

i.Consolidated Balance Sheets

ii.Consolidated Statements of Income

iii.Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

iv.Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

v.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

vi.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

53

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Meridian Corporation:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Meridian Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2011.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2020

 

54

Table of Contents

Meridian Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

Cash and due from banks

 

$

19,106

 

23,159

Federal funds sold

 

 

20,265

 

793

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

39,371

 

23,952

Securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $58,874 and $50,942 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018)

 

 

58,856

 

50,428

Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $9,003 and $12,655 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018)

 

 

8,780

 

12,741

Equity Investments

 

 

1,009

 

 —

Mortgage loans held for sale (amortized cost of $33,363 and $37,337 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018)

 

 

33,704

 

37,695

Loans, net of fees and costs (includes $10,546 and $11,422 of loans at fair value, amortized cost of $10,186 and $11,466 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018)

 

 

964,710

 

838,106

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

 

(9,513)

 

(8,053)

Loans, net of the allowance for loan and lease losses

 

 

955,197

 

830,053

Restricted investment in bank stock

 

 

8,072

 

7,002

Bank premises and equipment, net

 

 

8,636

 

9,638

Bank owned life insurance

 

 

11,859

 

11,569

Accrued interest receivable

 

 

3,148

 

2,889

Other real estate owned

 

 

120

 

 —

Deferred income taxes (Footnote 1)

 

 

2,115

 

1,728

Goodwill and intangible assets

 

 

4,773

 

5,046

Other assets

 

 

14,379

 

4,739

Total assets

 

$

1,150,019

 

997,480

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest bearing

 

$

139,450

 

126,150

Interest-bearing

 

 

711,718

 

625,980

Total deposits

 

 

851,168

 

752,130

Short-term borrowings

 

 

123,676

 

114,300

Long-term debt

 

 

3,123

 

6,238

Subordinated debentures

 

 

40,962

 

9,239

Accrued interest payable

 

 

1,088

 

305

Other liabilities (Footnote 1)

 

 

9,307

 

5,716

Total liabilities

 

 

1,029,324

 

887,928

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $1 par value. Authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 6,407,685 and 6,406,795 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

 

 

6,408

 

6,407

Surplus

 

 

80,196

 

79,919

Treasury Stock

 

 

(3)

 

 —

Retained earnings (Footnote 1)

 

 

34,097

 

23,616

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(3)

 

(390)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

120,695

 

109,552

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,150,019

 

997,480

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

55

Table of Contents

Meridian Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

Interest income:

 

 

 

 

Loans, including fees

$

51,127

 

42,694

Securities:

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

1,248

 

797

Tax-exempt

 

324

 

451

Cash and cash equivalents

 

164

 

122

Total interest income

 

52,863

 

44,064

Interest expense:

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

13,907

 

9,227

Borrowings

 

2,620

 

2,180

Total interest expense

 

16,527

 

11,407

Net interest income

 

36,336

 

32,657

Provision for loan losses

 

901

 

1,577

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

35,435

 

31,080

Non-interest income:

 

 

 

 

Mortgage banking income

 

26,167

 

26,187

Wealth management income

 

3,624

 

3,917

SBA loan income

 

1,448

 

 —

Earnings on investment in life insurance

 

290

 

300

Net change in the fair value of derivative instruments

 

111

 

(161)

Net change in the fair value of loans held-for-sale

 

(13)

 

 7

Net change in the fair value of loans held-for-investment

 

391

 

(214)

Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale

 

165

 

 —

Service charges

 

110

 

115

Other

 

805

 

2,204

Total non-interest income

 

33,098

 

32,355

Non-interest expenses:

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

35,157

 

34,794

Occupancy and equipment

 

3,806

 

3,779

Loan expenses

 

2,579

 

2,643

Professional fees

 

2,614

 

2,162

Advertising and promotion

 

2,475

 

2,355

Data processing

 

1,327

 

1,261

Information technology

 

1,256

 

1,107

Communications

 

675

 

886

Other

 

5,130

 

3,958

Total non-interest expenses

 

55,019

 

52,945

Income before income taxes

 

13,514

 

10,490

Income tax expense

 

3,033

 

2,327

Net income

$

10,481

 

8,163

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

$

1.64

 

1.28

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

$

1.63

 

1.27

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

56

Table of Contents

Meridian Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

 

2019

    

2018

Net income:

 

$

10,481

 

8,163

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax (benefit) expense of $154, and ($37), respectively

 

 

512

 

(92)

Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains on sales realized in net income, net of tax expense of ($38), and $0, respectively

 

 

(125)

 

 —

Unrealized investment gains (losses), net of tax expense (benefit) of $116, and ($37), respectively

 

 

387

 

(92)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

387

 

(92)

Total comprehensive income

 

$

10,868

 

8,071

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

57

Table of Contents

Meridian Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Common

 

 

 

Treasury

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

Stock

    

Surplus

    

Stock

    

Earnings

    

Income (Loss)

    

Total

Balance, January 1, 2018 (Footnote 1)

$

6,392

 

79,501

 

 

 

15,453

 

(298)

 

101,048

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,163

 

 

 

8,163

Change in unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92)

 

(92)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,071

Share-based awards and exercises

 

15

 

125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

140

Compensation expense related to stock option grants

 

 

 

293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

293

Balance, December 31, 2018

$

6,407

 

79,919

 

 —

 

23,616

 

(390)

 

109,552

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,481

 

 

 

10,481

Change in unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

387

 

387

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,868

Share-based awards and exercises

 

 1

 

 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 6

Net purchase of treasury stock through publicly announced plans

 

 

 

 

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

(3)

Compensation expense related to stock option grants

 

 

 

272

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

272

Balance, December 31, 2019

$

6,408

 

80,196

 

(3)

 

34,097

 

(3)

 

120,695

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

58

Table of Contents

Meridian Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Net income

 

$

10,481

 

8,163

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of investment securities

 

 

(165)

 

 —

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,685

 

1,422

Loss on disposal of premises and equipment

 

 

14

 

 —

Provision for loan losses

 

 

901

 

1,577

Compensation expense for stock options

 

 

272

 

293

Net change in fair value of loans held for sale

 

 

13

 

(7)

Net change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

(111)

 

161

Net change in fair value of contingent assets

 

 

 —

 

177

Gain on sale of OREO

 

 

 —

 

(57)

SBA loan income

 

 

(1,448)

 

 —

Proceeds from sale of loans

 

 

607,122

 

660,344

Loans originated for sale

 

 

(573,416)

 

(633,219)

Mortgage banking income

 

 

(26,167)

 

(26,187)

Increase in accrued interest receivable

 

 

(259)

 

(353)

Increase in other assets

 

 

276

 

(402)

Earnings from investment in life insurance

 

 

(290)

 

(300)

Deferred income tax (benefit) (Footnote 1)

 

 

(503)

 

(385)

Increase in accrued interest payable

 

 

783

 

89

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities (Footnote 1)

 

 

2,382

 

(286)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

21,569

 

11,030

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Activity in available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities, repayments and calls

 

 

14,046

 

6,070

Sales

 

 

24,627

 

 —

Purchases

 

 

(44,679)

 

(17,094)

Proceeds from sale of OREO

 

 

 —

 

494

Settlement of forward contracts

 

 

(67)

 

109

(Increase) decrease in restricted stock

 

 

(1,070)

 

(188)

Net increase in loans

 

 

(135,188)

 

(146,119)

Purchases of premises and equipment

 

 

(746)

 

(1,639)

Proceeds from settlement of loans

 

 

 —

 

2,766

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(143,077)

 

(155,601)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in deposits

 

 

99,038

 

125,021

Increase (decrease) in short term borrowings

 

 

9,376

 

12,750

Repayment of long term debt (FHLB advances)

 

 

(2,290)

 

 —

Repayment of long term debt (Acquisition note)

 

 

(825)

 

(825)

Repayment of long term debt (Subordinated debt)

 

 

(7,432)

 

(4,069)

Proceeds from issuance of long term debt (Subordinated debt)

 

 

40,000

 

 —

Debt issuance costs on Subordinated debt

 

 

(942)

 

 —

Net purchase of treasury stock through publicly announced plans

 

 

(3)

 

 —

Share based awards and exercises

 

 

 6

 

140

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

136,927

 

133,017

Net change in cash and cash equivalents 

 

 

15,419

 

(11,554)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

23,952

 

35,506

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

39,371

 

23,952

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

15,744

 

11,318

Income taxes

 

 

2,643

 

2,735

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers from loans and leases to real estate owned

 

 

120

 

 —

Transfers from loans held for sale to loans held for investment

 

 

3,561

 

 —

Net loans purchased, not settled

 

 

1,001

 

 —

Net loans sold, not settled

 

 

(9,255)

 

 —

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

59

Table of Contents

(1)        Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a)          Nature of Operations

Meridian Corporation (the “Corporation”) was incorporated on June 8, 2009, by and at the direction of the board of directors of Meridian Bank (the “Bank”) for the sole purpose of acquiring the Bank and serving as the Bank’s parent bank holding company.  On August 24, 2018, the Corporation acquired the Bank in a merger and reorganization effected under Pennsylvania law and in accordance with the terms of a Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated April 26, 2018 (the “Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Agreement, on August 24, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. all of the outstanding shares of the Bank’s $1.00 par value common stock formerly held by its shareholders was converted into and exchanged for one newly issued share of the Corporation’s par value common stock, and the Bank became a subsidiary of the Corporation. Because the Bank and the Corporation were entities under common control, this exchange of shares between entities under common control resulted in the retrospective combination of the Bank and the Corporation for all periods presented as if the combination had been in effect since inception of common control.  As the Corporation had no assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses or operations prior to August 24, 2018, the historical financial statements of the Bank are the historical financial statements of the combined entity. 

The Corporation operates in a highly competitive market area that includes local, national and regional banks as competitors along with savings banks, credit unions, insurance companies, trust companies and registered investment advisors. The Corporation and its subsidiaries are regulated by many regulatory agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Federal Reserve and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking.

 

The Bank was incorporated on March 16, 2004 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and is a Pennsylvania state-chartered bank. The Bank commenced operations on July 8, 2004 and is a full-service bank providing personal and business lending and deposit services through 6 full-service banking offices in Pennsylvania and 9 mortgage loan production offices throughout the Delaware Valley. The Bank and Corporation are headquartered in Malvern, Pennsylvania, located in the western suburbs of Philadelphia and serves southeastern Pennsylvania and the rest of the Delaware Valley.

 

(b)          Basis of Presentation

The accounting policies of the Corporation conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

The consolidated financial statements include accounts of the Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank, and the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Bank: APEX Realty LLC; Meridian Wealth Partners LLC; and Meridian Land Settlement Services LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Amounts subject to significant estimates are items such as the allowance for loan and lease losses and lending related commitments, the fair value of financial instruments, other-than-temporary impairments of investment securities, the valuations of goodwill and intangible assets, and servicing assets.  Although our current estimates contemplate current conditions and how we expect them to change in the future, due to the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on financial markets and the economy both locally and nationally, it is reasonably possible that this could materially affect these significant estimates and our results of operations and financial condition. The World Health Organization has declared the outbreak to constitute a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.” The COVID-19 outbreak is disrupting supply chains and affecting production and sales across a range of industries. The extent of the impact of COVID-19 on our operational and financial performance will depend on certain developments, including the duration and spread of the outbreak, impact on our customers, employees

60

Table of Contents

and vendors all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. At this point, the extent to which COVID-19 may impact our financial condition or results of operations is uncertain.  Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

 

During the quarter-ended March 31, 2019, the Corporation identified and corrected an immaterial error related to Maryland state licensing requirements for mortgage loan originations by our Mortgage division. As the result of our mortgage operations not being fully compliant with Maryland licensing law, we agreed to reimburse consumers approximately $474 thousand in interest and certain fees on loans originated, in addition to paying a fine of $12 thousand to resolve the matter. The Corporation has revised its comparative consolidated financial statements in the amount of $407 thousand, or $315 thousand net of tax, for periods prior to January 1, 2018 related to interest and fees on loans. The error correction impacted beginning retained earnings, deferred tax assets and other liabilities as of January 1, 2018, as shown below.

The following table summarizes the impacts of the correction on the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    

 

Reported

 

Corrections

 

Revised

Deferred income taxes

 

$

1,312

 

92

 

1,404

Other liabilities

 

 

5,426

 

407

 

5,833

Retained earnings

 

 

15,768

 

(315)

 

15,453

 

The following table summarizes the impacts of the correction on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    

 

Reported

 

Corrections

 

Revised

Deferred income taxes

 

$

1,636

 

92

 

1,728

Other liabilities

 

 

5,309

 

407

 

5,716

Retained earnings

 

 

23,931

 

(315)

 

23,616

 

The following table summarizes the impacts of the corrections to our capital ratios as of December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018 - as reported

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be well capitalized under

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For capital adequacy

 

prompt corrective action

 

 

Actual

 

purposes *

 

provisions

(dollars in thousands):

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

122,577

 

13.70%

 

$

71,577

 

8.00%

 

$

89,472

 

10.00%

Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

105,196

 

11.76%

 

 

40,262

 

4.50%

 

 

58,157

 

6.50%

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

105,196

 

11.76%

 

 

53,683

 

6.00%

 

 

71,577

 

8.00%

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

 

 

105,196

 

11.20%

 

 

37,578

 

4.00%

 

 

46,972

 

5.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018 - as revised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be well capitalized under

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For capital adequacy

 

prompt corrective action

 

 

 

Actual

 

purposes *

 

provisions

 

(dollars in thousands):

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

 

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

122,262

 

13.66%

 

$

71,585

 

8.00%

 

$

89,481

 

10.00%

 

Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.72%

 

 

40,266

 

4.50%

 

 

58,163

 

6.50%

 

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.72%

 

 

53,689

 

6.00%

 

 

71,585

 

8.00%

 

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.16%

 

 

37,581

 

4.00%

 

 

46,977

 

5.00%

 

*     Does not include capital conservation buffer of 1.250% for 2019 and 1.875% for 2018

61

Table of Contents

 

 

(c)          Significant Concentrations of Credit Risk

Most of the Corporation’s activities are with customers located within the tri-state area of Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey. Note 4 discusses the types of securities that the Corporation invests in. Note 5 discusses types of lending that the Corporation engages in. Although the Corporation has a diversified loan portfolio, its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is influenced by the region’s economy. The Corporation does not have any significant concentrations to any one industry or customer, however there is significant concentration of commercial real estate-backed loans, amounting to 37% and 37% of total loans held for investment, as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

(d)          Presentation of Cash Flows

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased or sold for one day periods. Cash balances required to meet regulatory reserve requirements of the Federal Reserve Board amounted to $1.1 million at December 31, 2019.

(e)          Securities

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and re‑evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date.

Securities classified as available‑for‑sale are those securities that the Corporation intends to hold for an indefinite period of time but not necessarily to maturity. Securities available‑for‑sale are carried at fair value. Any decision to sell a security classified as available‑for‑sale would be based on various factors, including significant movement in interest rates, changes in maturity mix of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities, liquidity needs, regulatory capital considerations and other similar factors. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as increases or decreases in other comprehensive income. Realized gains or losses, determined on the basis of the cost of the specific securities sold, are included in earnings. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities.

Securities classified as held to maturity are those debt securities the Corporation has both the intent and ability to hold to maturity regardless of changes in market conditions, liquidity needs or changes in general economic conditions. These securities are carried at cost adjusted for the amortization of premium and accretion of discount, computed on a level yield basis.

Investments in equity securities are recorded in accordance with ASC 321-10, Investments - Equity Securities.    

 

The Corporation’s accounting policy specifies that (a) if the Corporation does not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and (b) it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be considered other‑than‑temporarily impaired, unless there is a credit loss. When the Corporation does not intend to sell the security, and it is more likely than not, the Corporation will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it will recognize the credit component of an other‑than‑temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. The Corporation did not recognize any other‑than‑temporary impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

(f)           Loans Receivable

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of an allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of

62

Table of Contents

certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) of the related loans. The Corporation generally amortizes these amounts over the contractual life of the loan.

Loans that were originated by the Corporation and intended for sale in the secondary market to permanent investors, but were either repurchased or unsalable due to defect, are held for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, but are carried at fair value.

The accrual of interest is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and charged against current year income. Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.

(g)          Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL” or “Allowance”) is established through provisions for loan losses charged against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the Allowance, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the Allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the Allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Charge-offs for retail consumer loans are generally made for any balance not adequately secured after 120 cumulative days past due.

The Allowance is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that are probable and estimable. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the Allowance is based on known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available. In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s Allowance and may require the Corporation to recognize additions to the Allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management.

The Allowance consists of general and specific components. The general component covers non-classified loans, as well as, non-impaired classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful, substandard, and are on non-accrual and have been deemed impaired. Loan classifications are determined based on various assessments such as the borrower’s overall financial condition, payment history, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case‑by‑case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

63

Table of Contents

For commercial and construction loans, impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral adjusted for cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous residential mortgage and consumer loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Corporation does not separately identify individual loans of this nature for impairment disclosures, unless such loans become impaired or are troubled and the subject of a restructuring agreement.

Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if the Corporation grants such borrowers concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring generally involve a temporary reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date.

No portion of the Allowance is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire Allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.

(h)          Mortgage Banking Activities and Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

The Corporation’s mortgage banking division operates 9 offices in the tri-state area of Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey. The mortgage banking division originates conventional mortgages, FHA, VA, USDA, and other state insured mortgages. The loans are generally sold to various investors in the secondary market. Mortgage loans originated by the Corporation and intended for sale in the secondary market to permanent investors are carried at fair value and are classified as mortgage loans held for sale on the balance sheet. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded in mortgage banking income.

The Corporation enters into commitments to originate loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding (interest rate lock commitments). Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be derivatives. Time elapsing between the issuance of a loan commitment and closing and sale of the loan generally ranges from 30 to 120 days. The Corporation protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward sale contracts, whereby the Corporation commits to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed interest rate risk on the loan. The Corporation also commits to loan sales through a mandatory sales channel which are economically hedged by the future sale of mortgage-backed securities to third-party counterparties to mitigate the effect of changes in interest rates on the values of both the interest rate locks and mortgage loans held for sale.  By entering into best efforts commitments and economically hedging the mandatory commitments, the Corporation limits its exposure to loss and its realization of significant gains related to its rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates.

The Corporation utilizes a third-party model to determine the fair value of rate lock commitments or forward sale contracts.  This model uses investor quotes while taking into consideration the probability that the rate lock commitments will close. Net derivative assets and liabilities are recorded within other assets or other liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets, with changes in fair value during the period recorded within net change in the fair value of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of income.

(i)          Loan Servicing Rights

The Corporation sells substantially all of the residential mortgage loans we originate to third parties; however, the Corporation may retain the servicing rights related to some of these loans. A fee, usually based on a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the loan, is received in return for these services. Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs") are recognized when a loan’s servicing rights are retained upon sale of a loan.

The Corporation also sells the guaranteed portion of certain Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans to third parties and retains servicing rights and receives servicing fees.  All such transfers are accounted for as sales.

64

Table of Contents

While the Corporation may retain a portion of certain sold SBA loans, its continuing involvement in the portion of the loan that was sold is limited to certain servicing responsibilities. 

These servicing assets amortize to noninterest expense in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing life of the underlying loans.  The servicing assets are evaluated quarterly for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to their amortized cost. Impairment is recognized on the income statement to the extent the fair value is less than the capitalized amount of the servicing assets.

(j)          Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned (OREO) is comprised of property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed‑in‑lieu of foreclosure. The Corporation acquires OREO through the wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, Apex Realty. OREO is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, or the loan amount net of estimated selling costs, at the date of foreclosure. The cost basis of OREO is its recorded value at the time of acquisition. After acquisition, valuations are periodically performed by management and subsequent changes in the valuation allowance are charged to OREO expense. Revenues, such as rental income, and holding expenses are included in other income and other expenses, respectively.  The Corporation had $120 and $0 thousand of OREO at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

(k)          Restricted Investment in Bank Stock

Restricted bank stock is principally comprised of stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB). Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB to hold stock according to a predetermined formula. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, the Corporation had an investment of $8.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively, related to the FHLB stock. Also included in restricted stock is Atlantic Central Bankers Bank (primary correspondent bank) stock in the amount of $50 thousand as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. All restricted stock is carried at cost.

Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB.

Management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB restricted stock as of December 31, 2019 or 2018.

(l)          Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets, including loan and loan participation sales, are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Corporation, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Corporation does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

(m)         Bank Premises and Equipment

Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. The costs of maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; while major replacements, improvements and additions are capitalized.  Depreciation expense is computed on the straight‑line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets or, for leasehold improvements, over the effective life of the related lease if less than the estimated useful life.

65

Table of Contents

(n)         Advertising Costs

The Corporation follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred.

(o)          Employee Benefit Plans

The Corporation has a 401(k) Plan (the Plan) and an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). All employees are eligible to participate in the Plan and ESOP after they have attained the age of 21 and have also completed 3 consecutive months of service. Employees must participate in the Plan to be eligible for participation in the ESOP. The employees may contribute to the Plan up to the maximum percentage allowable by law of their compensation. The Corporation may make a discretionary matching contribution to the Plan and the ESOP. Full vesting in the Corporation’s contribution to the Plan and ESOP is over a three‑year period. The Corporation’s contribution to the Plan and ESOP was $636 thousand and $325 thousand, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $577 thousand and $332 thousand, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, no shares were purchased by the ESOP, while for the year ended December 31, 2018, 4,462 shares were purchased by the ESOP at an average market value of $17.50. Shares in the ESOP that are committed to be released to employees are treated as outstanding shares in the Corporation’s computation of earnings per share. There were 36,619 shares in the ESOP as of December 31, 2019. Shares in the ESOP would be impacted by any stock dividends and stock splits in the same manner as all other outstanding common shares of the Corporation.

(p)          Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are provided on the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and net operating losses and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carry-forwards and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

The Corporation follows accounting guidance related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. Under the “more likely than not” threshold guidelines, the Corporation believes no significant uncertain tax positions exist, either individually or in the aggregate, that would give rise to the non-recognition of an existing tax benefit. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, the Corporation had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties. The Corporation’s policy is to account for interest as a component of interest expense and penalties as a component of other expense. The Corporation is no longer subject to examination by federal, state and local taxing authorities for years before January 1, 2016.

(q)          Stock Compensation Plans

Stock compensation accounting guidance requires that the compensation cost relating to share‑based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The stock compensation accounting guidance covers a wide range of share‑based compensation arrangements including stock options and restricted share plans.

The stock compensation accounting guidance requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and recognized over the employees’ service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded‑vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight‑line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. A Black‑Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards.

66

Table of Contents

(r)          Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available‑for‑sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 consist of unrealized holding gains and (losses) arising during the year on available‑for‑sale securities.

(s)           Off‑Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation has entered into off‑balance sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded in the balance sheet when they are funded.

(t)           Derivative Financial Instruments

The Corporation recognizes all derivative financial instruments related to its mortgage banking activities on its balance sheet at fair value. The Corporation utilizes investor quotes to determine the fair value of interest rate lock commitment derivatives and market pricing to determine the fair value of forward security purchase commitment derivatives. All changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recognized in earnings.

The Corporation enters into interest rate swaps that allow commercial loan customers to effectively convert a variable-rate commercial loan agreement to a fixed-rate commercial loan agreement. The interest rate swaps are recognized on the Corporation’s balance sheet at fair value.  Under these agreements, the Corporation originates variable-rate loans with customers in addition to interest rate swap agreements, which serve to effectively swap the customers’ variable-rate loans into fixed-rate loans. The Corporation then enters into corresponding swap agreements with swap dealer counterparties to economically hedge its exposure on the variable and fixed components of the customer agreements. The interest rate swaps with both the customers and third parties are not designated as hedges under ASC 815 and are marked to market through earnings. As the interest rate swaps are structured to offset each other, changes to the underlying benchmark interest rates considered in the valuation of these instruments do not result in an impact to earnings; however, there may be fair value adjustments related to credit quality variations between counterparties, which may impact earnings as required by ASC 820.

(u)           Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share takes into account the potential dilution that would occur if in the-money stock options were exercised and converted into shares of common stock and restricted stock awards and performance-based stock awards were vested. Proceeds assumed to have been received on options exercises are assumed to be used to purchase shares of the Corporation’s common stock at the average market price during the period, as required by the treasury stock method of accounting. The effects of stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in periods in which the effect would be antidilutive.

(v)Revenue Recognition

The Corporation recognizes all sources of income on the accrual method, with the exception of nonaccrual loans and leases.

The Corporation earns wealth management fee income from investment advisory services provided to individual and 401k customers. Fees that are determined based on the market value of the assets held in their accounts are generally billed quarterly, in arrears, based on the market value of assets at the end of the previous billing period.

67

Table of Contents

Other related services that are based on a fixed fee schedule are recognized when the services are rendered. Fees that are transaction based, including trade execution services, are recognized at the point in time that the transaction is executed, i.e. the trade date. Included in other assets on the balance sheet is a receivable for wealth management fees that have been earned but not yet collected.

 

(2)Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share takes into account the potential dilution computed pursuant to the treasury stock method that could occur if stock options were exercised and converted into common stock. The effects of stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in periods in which the effect would be anti-dilutive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

$

10,481

 

 

8,163

Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

6,407

 

 

6,397

Effect of dilutive common shares

 

 

31

 

 

30

Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

6,438

 

 

6,427

Basic earnings per share

 

$

1.64

 

 

1.28

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

1.63

 

 

1.27

Antidilutive shares excluded from computation of average dilutive earnings per share

 

 

199

 

 

126

 

 

 

(3)Goodwill and Other Intangibles

The Corporation’s goodwill and intangible assets are detailed below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

 

 

Balance

 

Amortization

 

 

December 31, 

 

Amortization

 

December 31, 

 

Period

(dollars in thousands)

    

2018

    

Expense

    

2019

    

(in years)

Goodwill - Wealth

 

$

899

 

 —

 

899

 

Indefinite

Total Goodwill

 

 

899

 

 —

 

899

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets - trade name

 

 

266

 

 —

 

266

 

Indefinite

Intangible assets - customer relationships

 

 

3,727

 

(204)

 

3,523

 

20

Intangible assets - non competition agreements

 

 

154

 

(69)

 

85

 

4

Total Intangible Assets

 

 

4,147

 

(273)

 

3,874

 

 

Total 

 

$

5,046

 

(273)

 

4,773

 

 

 

Accumulated amortization on intangible assets was $750 thousand and $477 thousand as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. 

In accordance with ASC Topic 350, the Corporation performed a qualitative assessment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets as of December 31, 2019 and determined it was more likely than not that the fair value of the Corporation, including the wealth reporting unit where the goodwill and identifiable intangible assets are held, was more than its carrying amount.

 

 

 

 

68

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2019, the schedule of future intangible asset amortization is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

273

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

221

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

204

2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

204

2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

204

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,502

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,608

 

 

 

(4)Securities

The amortized cost and approximate fair value of securities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

unrealized

 

unrealized

 

Fair

(dollars in thousands)

    

cost

    

gains

    

losses

    

value

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. asset backed securities

 

$

11,967

 

— 

 

(101)

 

11,866

U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities

 

 

5,457

 

66

 

(26)

 

5,497

U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

35,096

 

300

 

(173)

 

35,223

State and municipal securities

 

 

6,354

 

 —

 

(84)

 

6,270

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

58,874

 

366

 

(384)

 

58,856

Securities held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and municipal securities

 

 

8,780

 

223

 

 —

 

9,003

Total securities held-to-maturity

 

$

8,780

 

223

 

 —

 

9,003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

unrealized

 

unrealized

 

Fair

(dollars in thousands)

    

cost

    

gains

    

losses

    

value

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities

 

$

24,092

 

45

 

(271)

 

23,866

U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

14,754

 

52

 

(142)

 

14,664

State and municipal securities

 

 

11,096

 

22

 

(199)

 

10,919

Investments in mutual funds

 

 

1,000

 

 —

 

(21)

 

979

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

50,942

 

119

 

(633)

 

50,428

Securities held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

$

1,991

 

 —

 

(13)

 

1,978

State and municipal securities

 

 

10,750

 

17

 

(90)

 

10,677

Total securities held-to-maturity

 

$

12,741

 

17

 

(103)

 

12,655

 

At December 31, 2019, the Corporation had an investment in mutual funds with a fair value of $1 million. At December 31, 2019, the Corporation had nine U.S. asset backed securities, one U.S. Government sponsored agency mortgage‑backed security, fifteen U.S. Government sponsored agency collateralized mortgage obligations, and six State and municipal securities in unrealized loss positions. At December 31, 2018, the Corporation had two U.S. Treasuries, twenty-four U.S. Government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, twelve U.S. Government sponsored agency collateralized mortgage obligations, twenty-six State and municipal securities, and one mutual fund in realized loss positions. As of

69

Table of Contents

December 31, 2019, the temporary impairment is primarily the result of changes in market interest rates subsequent to purchase and the Corporation did not intend to sell these securities prior to recovery and it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery to satisfy liquidity needs, and therefore, no securities are deemed to be other‑than‑temporarily impaired.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, securities having a fair value of $19.5 million and $20.6 million, respectively, were specifically pledged as collateral for public funds, the FRB discount window program, FHLB borrowings and other purposes. The FHLB has a blanket lien on non-pledged, mortgage-related loans and securities as part of the Corporation’s borrowing agreement with the FHLB.

The following table shows the Corporation’s investment gross unrealized losses and fair value aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

Less than 12 Months

 

12 Months or more

 

Total

 

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

(dollars in thousands)

    

value

    

losses

    

value

    

losses

    

value

    

losses

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. asset backed securities

 

$

11,866

 

(101)

 

— 

 

 —

 

11,866

 

(101)

U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities

 

 

— 

 

 —

 

1,636

 

(26)

 

1,636

 

(26)

U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

16,283

 

(116)

 

3,108

 

(57)

 

19,391

 

(173)

State and municipal securities

 

 

6,270

 

(84)

 

 —

 

 —

 

6,270

 

(84)

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

34,419

 

(301)

 

4,744

 

(83)

 

39,163

 

(384)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

Less than 12 Months

 

12 Months or more

 

Total

 

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

(dollars in thousands)

    

value

    

losses

    

value

    

losses

    

value

    

losses

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities

 

$

2,354

 

(6)

 

15,223

 

(265)

 

17,577

 

(271)

U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

2,636

 

(14)

 

5,620

 

(128)

 

8,256

 

(142)

State and municipal securities

 

 

957

 

(11)

 

8,746

 

(188)

 

9,703

 

(199)

Investments in mutual funds

 

 

980

 

(21)

 

 —

 

 —

 

980

 

(21)

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

6,927

 

(52)

 

29,589

 

(581)

 

36,516

 

(633)

Securities held-to-maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

1,978

 

(13)

 

1,978

 

(13)

State and municipal securities

 

 

1,545

 

(5)

 

4,783

 

(85)

 

6,328

 

(90)

Total securities held-to-maturity

 

$

1,545

 

(5)

 

6,761

 

(98)

 

8,306

 

(103)

 

70

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and carrying value of securities at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are shown below by contractual maturities. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as issuers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

Available-for-sale

 

Held-to-maturity

 

Available-for-sale

 

Held-to-maturity

 

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

Amortized

 

Fair

(dollars in thousands)

    

cost

    

value

    

cost

    

value

    

cost

    

value

    

cost

    

value

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Due in one year or less

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

$

906

 

902

 

1,991

 

1,978

 Due after one year through five years

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,242

 

4,311

 

 

1,236

 

1,226

 

3,154

 

3,148

 Due after five years through ten years

 

 

1,329

 

1,324

 

4,538

 

4,692

 

 

6,411

 

6,290

 

7,596

 

7,529

 Due after ten years

 

 

16,992

 

16,812

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

2,543

 

2,501

 

 —

 

 —

    Subtotal

 

 

18,321

 

18,136

 

8,780

 

9,003

 

 

11,096

 

10,919

 

12,741

 

12,655

Mortgage-related securities

 

 

40,553

 

40,720

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

38,846

 

38,530

 

 —

 

 —

Mutual funds with no stated maturity

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

1,000

 

979

 

 —

 

 —

    Total

 

$

58,874

 

58,856

 

8,780

 

9,003

 

$

50,942

 

50,428

 

12,741

 

12,655

 

 

 

Proceeds from the sale of available for sale investment securities totaled $24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Net gain on sale of available for sale securities totaled $165 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019.  There were no sales of available for sale securities for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

 

(5)Loans Receivable

Loans and leases outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are detailed by category as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

$

33,704

 

37,695

Real estate loans:

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

 

362,590

 

325,393

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

81,583

 

82,286

Residential mortgage (1)

 

 

53,665

 

53,360

Construction

 

 

172,044

 

116,906

Total real estate loans

 

 

669,882

 

577,945

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

273,301

 

254,050

Small business loans

 

 

21,616

 

5,756

Consumer

 

 

1,003

 

701

Leases, net

 

 

697

 

1,335

Total portfolio loans and leases

 

 

966,499

 

839,787

Total loans and leases

 

$

1,000,203

 

877,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans with predetermined rates

 

$

293,114

 

264,376

Loans with adjustable or floating rates

 

 

707,089

 

613,106

Total loans and leases

 

$

1,000,203

 

877,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred loan origination (fees) costs

 

$

(1,789)

 

(1,681)

 

(1) Includes $10,546 and $11,422 of loans at fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

71

Table of Contents

 

Components of the net investment in leases at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are detailed as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Minimum lease payments receivable

 

$

729

 

1,420

Unearned lease income

 

 

(32)

 

(85)

Total

 

$

697

 

1,335

 

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans and Leases

The following table presents an aging of the Corporation’s loan and lease portfolio as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90+ days

 

 

 

 

 

Accruing

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

30-89 days

 

past due and

 

Total past

 

 

 

Loans and

 

loans and

 

Total loans

 

Delinquency

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

past due

    

still accruing

    

due

    

Current

    

leases

    

leases

    

and leases

    

percentage

 

Commercial mortgage

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

361,857

 

361,857

 

733

 

362,590

 

0.20

%

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

81,046

 

81,046

 

537

 

81,583

 

0.66

 

Residential mortgage (1)

 

 

4,675

 

 —

 

4,675

 

47,446

 

52,121

 

1,544

 

53,665

 

11.59

 

Construction

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

172,044

 

172,044

 

 —

 

172,044

 

 —

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

206

 

 —

 

206

 

272,674

 

272,880

 

421

 

273,301

 

0.23

 

Small business loans

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

21,616

 

21,616

 

 —

 

21,616

 

 —

 

Consumer

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,003

 

1,003

 

 —

 

1,003

 

 —

 

Leases

 

 

162

 

 —

 

162

 

535

 

697

 

 —

 

697

 

23.24

 

Total

 

$

5,043

 

 —

 

5,043

 

958,221

 

963,264

 

3,235

 

966,499

 

0.86

%

(1) Includes $10,546 of loans at fair value as of December 31, 2019  ($9,056 of current, $786 of 30-89 days past due and $704 of nonaccrual).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90+ days

 

 

 

 

 

Accruing

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

30-89 days

 

past due and

 

Total past

 

 

 

Loans and

 

loans and

 

Total loans

 

Delinquency

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

past due

    

still accruing

    

due

    

Current

    

leases

    

leases

    

and leases

    

percentage

 

Commercial mortgage

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

324,169

 

324,169

 

1,224

 

325,393

 

0.38

%

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

348

 

 —

 

348

 

81,855

 

82,203

 

83

 

82,286

 

0.52

 

Residential mortgage (1)

 

 

195

 

 —

 

195

 

51,018

 

51,213

 

2,147

 

53,360

 

4.39

 

Construction

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

116,906

 

116,906

 

 —

 

116,906

 

 —

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

217

 

 —

 

217

 

253,356

 

253,573

 

477

 

254,050

 

0.27

 

Small business loans

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

5,756

 

5,756

 

 —

 

5,756

 

 —

 

Consumer

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

701

 

701

 

 —

 

701

 

 —

 

Leases

 

 

49

 

 —

 

49

 

1,286

 

1,335

 

 —

 

1,335

 

3.67

 

Total

 

$

809

 

 —

 

809

 

835,047

 

835,856

 

3,931

 

839,787

 

0.56

%

(1) Includes $11,422 of loans at fair value as of December 31, 2018  ($10,098 of current,  $187 of 30-89 days past due and $1,137 of nonaccrual).

 

 

72

Table of Contents

(6)Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (the Allowance)

The Allowance is established through provisions for loan and lease losses charged against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the Allowance, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the Allowance.

The Allowance is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that are probable and estimable. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the Allowance is based on known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.

Roll-Forward of the Allowance by Portfolio Segment

The following tables detail the roll‑forward of the Corporation’s Allowance, by portfolio segment, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance,

(dollars in thousands)

    

December 31, 2018

    

Charge-offs

    

Recoveries

    

Provision

    

December 31, 2019

Commercial mortgage

 

$

3,209

 

 —

 

237

 

(20)

 

3,426

Home Equity lines and loans

 

 

323

 

 —

 

10

 

 9

 

342

Residential mortgage

 

 

191

 

 —

 

 5

 

(17)

 

179

Construction

 

 

1,627

 

 —

 

 —

 

735

 

2,362

Commercial and industrial

 

 

2,612

 

(30)

 

333

 

(231)

 

2,684

Small business loans

 

 

78

 

 —

 

 —

 

431

 

509

Consumer

 

 

 3

 

 —

 

 4

 

(1)

 

 6

Leases

 

 

10

 

 —

 

 —

 

(5)

 

 5

Total

 

$

8,053

 

(30)

 

589

 

901

 

9,513

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance,

(dollars in thousands)

    

December 31, 2017

    

Charge-offs

    

Recoveries

    

Provision

    

December 31, 2018

Commercial mortgage

 

$

2,434

 

 —

 

 7

 

768

 

3,209

Home Equity lines and loans

 

 

280

 

(221)

 

18

 

246

 

323

Residential mortgage

 

 

82

 

 —

 

61

 

48

 

191

Construction

 

 

1,689

 

 —

 

 —

 

(62)

 

1,627

Commercial and industrial

 

 

2,097

 

(244)

 

142

 

617

 

2,612

Small business loans

 

 

117

 

 —

 

 —

 

(39)

 

78

Consumer

 

 

 5

 

 —

 

 4

 

(6)

 

 3

Leases

 

 

 5

 

 —

 

 —

 

 5

 

10

Total

 

$

6,709

 

(465)

 

232

 

1,577

 

8,053

 

 

73

Table of Contents

The Allowance Allocated by Portfolio Segment

The following table details the allocation of the Allowance and the carrying value for loans and leases by portfolio segment based on the methodology used to evaluate the loans and leases for impairment as of December 31, 2019 respectively:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance on loans and leases

 

Carrying value of loans and leases

 

 

 

Individually

 

Collectively

 

 

 

Individually

 

Collectively

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

evaluated

 

evaluated

 

 

 

evaluated

 

evaluated

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

for impairment

    

for impairment

    

Total

    

for impairment

    

for impairment

    

Total

 

Commercial mortgage

 

$

 —

 

3,426

 

3,426

 

$

2,138

 

360,452

 

362,590

 

Home Equity lines and loans

 

 

46

 

296

 

342

 

 

536

 

81,047

 

81,583

 

Residential mortgage

 

 

 —

 

179

 

179

 

 

854

 

42,265

 

43,119

 

Construction

 

 

 —

 

2,362

 

2,362

 

 

1,247

 

170,797

 

172,044

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

27

 

2,657

 

2,684

 

 

1,288

 

272,013

 

273,301

 

Small business loans

 

 

63

 

446

 

509

 

 

1,244

 

20,372

 

21,616

 

Consumer

 

 

 —

 

 6

 

 6

 

 

 —

 

1,003

 

1,003

 

Leases

 

 

 —

 

 5

 

 5

 

 

 —

 

697

 

697

 

Total

 

$

136

 

9,377

 

9,513

 

$

7,307

 

948,646

 

955,953

(1)

 

(1)

Excludes deferred fees and loans carried at fair value.

The following table details the allocation of the Allowance and the carrying value for loans and leases by portfolio segment based on the methodology used to evaluate the loans and leases for impairment as of December 31, 2018 respectively:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance on loans and leases

 

Carrying value of loans and leases

 

 

 

Individually

 

Collectively

 

 

 

Individually

 

Collectively

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

evaluated

 

evaluated

 

 

 

evaluated

 

evaluated

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

for impairment

    

for impairment

    

Total

    

for impairment

    

for impairment

    

Total

 

Commercial mortgage

 

$

 —

 

3,209

 

3,209

 

$

1,929

 

323,464

 

325,393

 

Home Equity lines and loans

 

 

 —

 

323

 

323

 

 

83

 

82,203

 

82,286

 

Residential mortgage

 

 

 —

 

191

 

191

 

 

969

 

40,969

 

41,938

 

Construction

 

 

 —

 

1,627

 

1,627

 

 

1,281

 

115,625

 

116,906

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

103

 

2,509

 

2,612

 

 

443

 

253,607

 

254,050

 

Small business loans

 

 

 —

 

78

 

78

 

 

1,094

 

4,662

 

5,756

 

Consumer

 

 

 —

 

 3

 

 3

 

 

 —

 

701

 

701

 

Leases

 

 

 —

 

10

 

10

 

 

 —

 

1,335

 

1,335

 

Total

 

$

103

 

7,950

 

8,053

 

$

5,799

 

822,566

 

828,365

(1)


(1)

Excludes deferred fees and loans carried at fair value.

Loans and Leases by Credit Ratings

As part of the process of determining the Allowance to the different segments of the loan and lease portfolio, Management considers certain credit quality indicators. For the commercial mortgage, construction and commercial and industrial loan segments, periodic reviews of the individual loans are performed by Management. The results of these reviews are reflected in the risk grade assigned to each loan. These internally assigned grades are as follows:

·

Pass – Loans considered to be satisfactory with no indications of deterioration.

·

Special mention – Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves Management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

74

Table of Contents

·

Substandard – Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

·

Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Loan balances classified as doubtful have been reduced by partial charge-offs and are carried at their net realizable values.

The following table details the carrying value of loans and leases by portfolio segment based on the credit quality indicators used to determine the Allowance as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

    

 

 

    

Special

    

 

    

 

    

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Pass

 

mention

 

Substandard

 

Doubtful

 

Total

Commercial mortgage

 

$

353,724

 

5,821

 

3,045

 

 —

 

362,590

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

81,046

 

 —

 

537

 

 —

 

81,583

Construction

 

 

170,823

 

1,221

 

 —

 

 —

 

172,044

Commercial and industrial

 

 

251,320

 

9,648

 

12,333

 

 —

 

273,301

Small business loans

 

 

20,351

 

 —

 

1,265

 

 —

 

21,616

Total

 

$

877,264

 

16,690

 

17,180

 

 —

 

911,134

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

    

 

 

    

Special

    

 

    

 

    

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Pass

 

mention

 

Substandard

 

Doubtful

 

Total

Commercial mortgage

 

$

320,130

 

3,713

 

1,550

 

 —

 

325,393

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

82,121

 

 —

 

165

 

 —

 

82,286

Construction

 

 

114,249

 

2,657

 

 —

 

 —

 

116,906

Commercial and industrial

 

 

234,813

 

12,590

 

6,617

 

30

 

254,050

Small business loans

 

 

4,368

 

30

 

1,358

 

 —

 

5,756

Total

 

$

755,681

 

18,990

 

9,690

 

30

 

784,391

 

In addition to credit quality indicators as shown in the above tables, Allowance allocations for residential mortgages, consumer loans and leases are also applied based on their performance status as December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. No troubled debt restructurings performing according to modified terms are included in performing residential mortgages below for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

(dollars in thousands)

    

Performing

    

Nonperforming

    

Total

    

Performing

    

Nonperforming

    

Total

Residential mortgage

 

$

42,265

 

854

 

43,119

 

$

40,969

 

969

 

41,938

Consumer

 

 

1,003

 

 —

 

1,003

 

 

701

 

 —

 

701

Leases

 

 

697

 

 —

 

697

 

 

1,335

 

 —

 

1,335

Total

 

$

43,965

 

854

 

44,819

 

$

43,005

 

969

 

43,974

 

There were five nonperforming residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2019 and six at December 31, 2018 with a combined outstanding principal balance of $839 thousand and $1.9 million, respectively, which were carried at fair value and not included in the table above.

75

Table of Contents

Impaired Loans

The following tables detail the recorded investment and principal balance of impaired loans by portfolio segment, their related Allowance and interest income recognized for the periods.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2019

 

At December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Recorded

 

Principal

 

Related

 

recorded

 

Recorded

 

Principal

 

Related

 

recorded

(dollars in thousands)

    

investment

    

balance

    

allowance

    

investment

    

investment

    

balance

    

allowance

    

investment

Impaired loans with related allowance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Commercial and industrial

 

 

617

 

617

 

27

 

622

 

676

 

679

 

103

 

680

Small business loans

 

 

1,002

 

1,002

 

63

 

1,027

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

461

 

461

 

46

 

462

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Residential mortgage

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Construction

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Total

 

 

2,080

 

2,080

 

136

 

2,111

 

676

 

679

 

103

 

680

Impaired loans without related allowance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

$

2,138

 

2,173

 

 —

 

2,162

 

1,929

 

2,379

 

 —

 

1,982

Commercial and industrial

 

 

671

 

718

 

 —

 

693

 

598

 

682

 

 —

 

618

Small business loans

 

 

242

 

242

 

 —

 

250

 

263

 

263

 

 —

 

267

Home equity lines and loans

 

 

75

 

75

 

 —

 

76

 

83

 

89

 

 —

 

84

Residential mortgage

 

 

854

 

854

 

 —

 

855

 

969

 

978

 

 —

 

978

Construction

 

 

1,247

 

1,248

 

 —

 

1,262

 

1,281

 

1,281

 

 —

 

1,293

Total

 

 

5,227

 

5,310

 

 —

 

5,298

 

5,123

 

5,672

 

 —

 

5,222

Grand Total

 

$

7,307

 

7,390

 

136

 

7,409

 

5,799

 

6,351

 

103

 

5,902

 

Interest income recognized on performing impaired loans amounted to $206 thousand and $327 thousand for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Troubled Debt Restructuring

The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if both of the following conditions are met: (i) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, and (ii) the creditor has granted a concession. The most common concessions granted include one or more modifications to the terms of the debt, such as (a) a reduction in the interest rate for the remaining life of the debt, (b) an extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, (c) a temporary period of interest-only payments, (d) a reduction in the contractual payment amount for either a short period or remaining term of the loan, and (e) for leases, a reduced lease payment. A less common concession granted is the forgiveness of a portion of the principal.

The determination of whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties takes into account not only the current financial condition of the borrower, but also the potential financial condition of the borrower, were a concession not granted. The determination of whether a concession has been granted is very subjective in nature. For example, simply extending the term of a loan at its original interest rate or even at a higher interest rate could be interpreted as a concession unless the borrower could readily obtain similar credit terms from a different lender.

76

Table of Contents

The balance of TDRs at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

TDRs included in nonperforming loans and leases

 

$  

319

  

1,219

TDRs in compliance with modified terms

 

   

3,599

  

3,047

Total TDRs

 

$  

3,918

  

4,266

 

There were no loan and lease modifications granted during the year ended December 31, 2019 that were categorized as TDRs.

The following table presents information regarding loan and lease modifications granted during the year ended December 31, 2018 that were categorized as TDRs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

    

 

    

Pre-Modification

    

Post-Modification

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Recorded

 

Recorded

 

Related

(dollar in thousands)

 

Contracts

 

Investment

 

Investment

 

Allowance

Real Estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Commercial mortgage

 

 1

 

$

796

 

$

796

 

$

 —

 Land and Construction

 

 1

 

 

1,628

 

 

1,628

 

 

 —

 Commercial and industrial

 

 2

 

 

282

 

 

282

 

 

63

 Small business loans

 

 1

 

 

267

 

 

267

 

 

 

Total

 

 5

 

$

2,973

 

$

2,973

 

$

63

 

 

No loan and lease modifications granted during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 subsequently defaulted during the same time period.

The following table presents information regarding the number of contracts by type of loan and lease modifications made for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate

 

 

Loan Term

 

Change and Loan

 

    

Extension

 

Term Extension

Real Estate:

 

 

 

 

 Commercial Mortgage

 

 1

 

 —

 Land and Construction

 

 1

 

 —

 Commercial and industrial

 

 1

 

 1

 Small business loans

 

 1

 

 —

Total

 

 4

 

 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77

Table of Contents

(7)Bank Premises and Equipment

The components of premises and equipment at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Building

 

$

4,141

 

3,824

Leasehold improvements

 

 

3,156

 

3,013

Land

 

 

600

 

600

Land Improvements

 

 

215

 

215

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

 

2,574

 

2,447

Computer equipment and data processing software

 

 

6,360

 

6,211

Construction in process

 

 

102

 

118

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

 

(8,512)

 

(6,790)

Total

 

$

8,636

 

9,638

 

Total depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled $1.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively.

(8)Deposits

The components of deposits at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Demand, noninterest bearing

 

$

139,450

 

 

126,150

Demand, interest-bearing

 

 

94,416

 

 

114,610

Savings accounts

 

 

3,231

 

 

3,097

Money market accounts

 

 

302,242

 

 

229,557

Time deposits

 

 

311,829

 

 

278,716

Total

 

$

851,168

 

 

752,130

 

The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations over $250 thousand were $271.1 million and $233.7 milllion as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2019, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

  

 

 

    

$

261,473

2021

 

 

 

 

 

27,438

2022

 

 

 

 

 

727

2023

 

 

 

 

 

11,249

2024

 

 

 

 

 

10,942

 

 

 

 

 

$

311,829

 

 

(9)Short‑Term Borrowings and Long‑Term Debt

The Corporation’s short‑term borrowings generally consist of federal funds purchased and short‑term borrowings extended under agreements with Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh. The Corporation has two Federal Funds borrowing facilities with correspondent banks: one of $15 million and one of $24 million, respectively, which are both unsecured.  Federal funds purchased generally represent one‑day borrowings. The Corporation had no Federal funds purchased at December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018, respectively. The Corporation also has a facility with the Federal Reserve discount window of $10.4 million that is fully secured by investment securities and loans. There were no borrowings under this facility at December 31, 2019.

Short‑term borrowings as of December 31, 2019 consisted of short‑term advances from FHLB of Pittsburgh in the amounts of $102.3 million with interest at 1.81%,  $7.7 million with interest of 1.59%,  $5.1 million with interest at 1.59%,  $5.0 

78

Table of Contents

million with interest at 2.76%,  $3.1 million with interest of 2.03%, as well as the acquisition note for the Wealth division that had a balance of $413 thousand as of December 31, 2019.

Short‑term borrowings as of December 31, 2018 consisted of short‑term advances from FHLB of Pittsburgh in the amount of $112.5 million with interest at 2.62%,  $1.8 million with an original terms of 4 years and interest at 1.70%.  

Long‑term debt at December 31, 2019 consisted of the following fixed rate notes with the FHLB of Pittsburgh:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of

 

 

Maturity

 

Interest

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

date

    

rate

    

2019

    

2018

Mid-term Repo-fixed

 

06/28/21

 

1.88

%  

$

3,123

 

 —

Mid-term Repo-fixed

 

08/10/20

 

2.76

 

 

 —

 

5,000

Acquisition Purchase Note (1)

 

04/01/20

 

3.00

 

 

 —

 

1,238

    Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,123

 

6,238

 

(1)

The acquisition purchase note for the Wealth division is classified as short-term borrowing at December 31, 2019.  

The FHLB of Pittsburgh had issued $102.8 million of letters of credit to the Corporation for the benefit of the Corporation’s public deposit funds and loan customers. These letters of credit expire throughout 2019.

The Corporation has a maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB of Pittsburgh of $507.3 million and $437.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. All advances and letters of credit from the FHLB are secured by a blanket lien on non-pledged, mortgage-related loans and securities as part of the Corporation’s borrowing agreement with the FHLB.

 

(10)Subordinated Debentures

In December 2008, the Bank issued $550 thousand of mandatory convertible unsecured subordinated debentures (2008 Debentures). The 2008 Debentures have a maturity date of December 18, 2023 and interest on the 2008 Debentures is paid quarterly at 6%. The 2008 Debentures are convertible into 1 share of the Bank’s common stock for every $15 in principal amount of the 2008 Debentures automatically on such date, if any, as accumulated losses of the Bank first exceed the sum of the retained earnings and capital surplus accounts of the Bank. The 2008 Debentures began to repay principal in eight equal installments which commenced in December of 2016. As of December 31, 2019, $225 thousand of the 2008 Debentures remained outstanding, after pay downs of $119 thousand during 2019.

In December 2011, the Bank issued $1.4 million of mandatory convertible unsecured subordinated debentures (2011 Debentures). The 2011 Debentures have a maturity date of December 31, 2026 and interest on the 2011 Debentures is paid quarterly at 6%. The 2011 Debentures are convertible into 1 share of the Bank’s common stock for every $17 in principal amount of the 2011 Debentures automatically on such date, if any, as accumulated losses of the Bank first exceed the sum of the retained earnings and capital surplus accounts of the Bank.  The 2011 Debentures began to repay principal in eight equal installments which commenced in December of 2019. As of December 31, 2019, $809 thousand of the 2011 Debentures remained outstanding, after pay downs of $116 thousand during 2019.

In April 2013, the Bank issued $1.4 million of mandatory convertible unsecured subordinated debentures (2013 Debentures). The 2013 Debentures have a maturity date of December 31, 2028 and interest on the 2013 Debentures is paid quarterly at 6.5%. The 2013 Debentures are convertible into 1 share of the Bank’s common stock for every $22 in principal amount of the 2013 Debentures automatically on such date, if any, as accumulated losses of the Bank first exceed the sum of the retained earnings and capital surplus accounts of the Bank. As of December 31, 2019, $870 thousand of the 2013 Debentures remained outstanding, after pay downs of $0 thousand during 2019.

In June, August and September 2014, the Bank issued $3 million, $100 thousand, and $7 million of non-convertible unsecured subordinated debentures (2014 Debentures). The 2014 Debentures have maturity dates of June 30, 2024,

79

Table of Contents

June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2024, respectively. Interest on all three tranches of the 2014 Debentures is paid quarterly at 7.25%.  As of December 31, 2019, the Coporation redeemed the remaining $7.1 million of 2014 Debentures.

Upon formation of the bank holding company as described in detail in footnote 1, the Corporation assumed the 2008, 2011, 2013 and 2014 Debentures that were originally issued by the Bank.

In December 2019, The Corporation issued $40 million of fixed-to-floating rate mandatory convertible unsecured subordinated debentures (2019 Debentures). The 2019 Debentures have a maturity date of December 30, 2029 and interest on the 2019 Debentures is paid semiannually at 5.375%. The debt issuance costs are included as a direct deduction from the debt liability and these costs are amortized to interest expense using the effective yield method.

The 2008, 2011, and 2013 Debentures are includable as Tier 2 capital for determining the Bank’s compliance with regulatory capital requirements (see footnote 19). The 2019 Debentures are included as Tier 2 capital for the Corporation and as Tier 1 capital for the Bank. 

(11)Servicing Assets

The Corporation sells certain residential mortgage loans and the guaranteed portion of certain SBA loans to third parties and retains servicing rights and receives servicing fees. All such transfers are accounted for as sales. When the Corporation sells a residential mortgage loan, it does not retain any portion of that loan and its continuing involvement in such transfers is limited to certain servicing responsibilities. While the Corporation may retain a portion of certain sold SBA loans, its continuing involvement in the portion of the loan that was sold is limited to certain servicing responsibilities. When the contractual servicing fees on loans sold with servicing retained are expected to be more than adequate compensation to a servicer for performing the servicing, a capitalized servicing asset is recognized. The Corporation accounts for the transfers and servicing of financial assets in accordance with ASC 860, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities.

Residential Mortgage Loans

MSRs are amortized to non-interest expense in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing life of the underlying assets.  MSR’s are evaluated quarterly for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to their amortized cost.  Impairment is recognized on the income statement to the extent the fair value is less than the capitalized amount of the MSR.  The Corporation serviced $60.3 million and $24.9 million of residential mortgage loans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, the Corporation recognized servicing fee income of $372 thousand, compared to $241 thousand during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively.

Changes in the MSR balance are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2019

    

2018

Balance at beginning of the period

 

$

232

 

 —

Servicing rights capitalized

 

 

372

 

241

Amortization of servicing rights

 

 

(60)

 

(9)

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(98)

 

 —

Balance at end of the period

 

$

446

 

232

 

80

Table of Contents

Activity in the valuation allowance for MSR’s was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2019

    

2018

Valuation allowance, beginning of period

 

$

 —

 

 —

Impairment

 

 

(98)

 

 —

Recovery

 

 

 —

 

 —

Valuation allowance, end of period

 

$

(98)

 

 —

 

The Corporation uses assumptions and estimates in determining the fair value of MSRs. These assumptions include prepayment speeds and discount rates. The assumptions used in the valuation were based on input from buyers, brokers and other qualified personnel, as well as market knowledge. At December 31, 2019, the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Corporation’s MSRs included a lifetime constant prepayment rate equal to 13.08% and a discount rate equal to 9.00%.  At December 31, 2018, the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Corporation’s MSRs included a lifetime constant prepayment rate equal to 11.78% and a discount rate equal to 9.5%.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the sensitivity of the current fair value of the residential mortgage servicing rights to immediate 10% and 20% unfavorable changes in key economic assumptions are included in the following table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

Fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights

 

$

446

 

$

213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average life (years)

 

 

7.8

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepayment speed

 

 

13.08%

 

 

11.78%

   Impact on fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

        10% adverse change

 

$

(19)

 

$

(9)

        20% adverse change

 

 

(37)

 

 

(17)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

 

9.00%

 

 

9.50%

   Impact on fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

        10% adverse change

 

$

(14)

 

$

(8)

        20% adverse change

 

 

(27)

 

 

(15)

 

The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. As indicated, changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated without changing any other assumption; while in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or counteract the effect of the change.

SBA Loans

SBA loan servicing assets are amortized to non-interest expense in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing life of the underlying assets.  SBA loan servicing assets are evaluated quarterly for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to their amortized cost.  Impairment is recognized on the income statement to the extent the fair value is less than the capitalized amount of the SBA loan servicing asset.  The Corporation serviced $18.0 million of SBA loans, as of December 31, 2019 and no SBA loans, as of December 31, 2018.  During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Corporation recognized servicing fee income of $25 thousand.

81

Table of Contents

Changes in the SBA loan servicing asset balance are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2019

    

2018

Balance at beginning of the period

 

$

 —

 

 —

Servicing rights capitalized

 

 

383

 

 —

Amortization of servicing rights

 

 

(20)

 

 —

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(26)

 

 —

Balance at end of the period

 

$

337

 

 —

 

Activity in the valuation allowance for SBA loan servicing assets was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2019

    

2018

Valuation allowance, beginning of period

 

$

 —

 

 —

Impairment

 

 

(26)

 

 —

Recovery

 

 

 —

 

 —

Valuation allowance, end of period

 

$

(26)

 

 —

 

The Corporation uses assumptions and estimates in determining the fair value of SBA loan servicing rights. These assumptions include prepayment speeds, discount rates, and other assumptions. The assumptions used in the valuation were based on input from buyers, brokers and other qualified personnel, as well as market knowledge. At December 31, 2019, the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Corporation’s SBA loan servicing rights included a lifetime constant prepayment rate equal to 10.77%, and a discount rate equal to 11.28%. The Corporation did not service SBA loans at December 31, 2018.

At December 31, 2019, the sensitivity of the current fair value of the SBA loan servicing rights to immediate 10% and 20% unfavorable changes in key economic assumptions are included in the following table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2019

Fair value of SBA loan servicing rights

 

$

337

 

 

 

 

Weighted average life (years)

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

 

Prepayment speed

 

 

10.77%

   Impact on fair value:

 

 

 

        10% adverse change

 

$

(12)

        20% adverse change

 

 

(23)

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

 

11.28%

   Impact on fair value:

 

 

 

        10% adverse change

 

$

(9)

        20% adverse change

 

 

(18)

 

The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. As indicated, changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the SBA servicing rights is calculated without changing any other assumption; while in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or counteract the effect of the change.

 

82

Table of Contents

(12)Lease Commitments

The Corporation leases seventeen branch spaces from third parties under operating lease agreements expiring at different periods through February 2030. Under all current agreements, the Corporation is responsible for its portion of real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, and repairs and maintenance.

Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Future minimum lease payments by year and in the aggregate, under these lease agreements, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

Future minimum lease payments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

 

 

2020

 

$

1,133

2021

 

 

1,027

2022

 

 

857

2023

 

 

750

2024

 

 

764

Thereafter

 

 

3,319

 

 

$

7,850

 

 

(13)Stock-Based Compensation

The Corporation has issued stock options under the Meridian Bank 2004 Stock Option Plan (2004 Plan). The 2004 Plan authorized the Board of Directors to grant options up to an aggregate of 446,091 shares, as adjusted for the 5% stock dividends in 2012, 2014 and 2016 to officers, other employees and directors of the Corporation. No additional shares are available for future grants. The shares granted under the 2004 Plan to directors are nonqualified options. The shares granted under the 2004 Plan to officers and other employees are incentive stock options, and are subject to the limitations under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Meridian Bank 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (2016 Plan) was amended on May 24, 2018 to authorize the Board of Directors to grant up to an aggregate of 686,900 awards,  as adjusted for the 2016 5% stock dividend. A total of 128,450 options have been granted under the 2016 Plan through December 31, 2019. Options granted under the 2016 Plan to directors are nonqualified options, while options granted to officers and other employees are incentive stock options, and are subject to the limitations under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense over the vesting period. The fair value of stock option grants is determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The assumptions necessary for the calculation of the fair value are expected life of options, annual volatility of stock price, risk-free interest rate and annual dividend yield.

All awards granted under the 2016 Plan to date have a term that does not exceed ten years and vest 25% upon grant and become fully exercisable after three years of service from the grant date.

83

Table of Contents

The following table provides information about options outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Average

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

Grant Date

 

    

Shares

    

Price

    

Fair Value

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

211,915

 

$

14.99

 

$

4.00

Exercised

 

(14,508)

 

 

12.43

 

 

3.44

Granted

 

79,450

 

 

17.70

 

 

5.49

Forfeited

 

(2,787)

 

 

17.94

 

 

4.27

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

274,070

 

 

15.88

 

 

4.46

Exercised

 

(689)

 

 

11.79

 

 

3.89

Granted

 

73,000

 

 

17.03

 

 

4.90

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

346,381

 

 

16.13

 

 

4.55

Exercisable at December 31, 2019

 

240,208

 

 

15.52

 

 

4.34

Nonvested at December 31, 2019

 

106,173

 

$

17.49

 

$

5.03

 

The weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding stock options at December 31, 2019 is 7.2 years. The range of exercise prices is $9.88 to $19.00. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $240 thousand as of December 31, 2019.

The fair value of each option granted in 2019 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black‑Scholes option‑pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of 0.0%, risk‑free interest rate of between 1.95% and 2.61%, expected life of 5.75 years, and expected volatility of between 22.44% and 22.48% based on an average of the Corporation’s share price since going public and the expected volatility of similar public financial institutions in the Corporation’s market area for the period before the Corporation went public. The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2019 was $4.84 to $5.30 per share.

The fair value of each option granted in 2018 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black‑Scholes option‑pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of 0.0%, risk‑free interest rate of between 2.84% and  3.06%, expected life of 5.75 years, and expected volatility of 19.68% and 26.11% based on an average of the Corporation’s share price since going public and the expected volatility of similar public financial institutions in the Corporation’s market area. The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2018 was $4.87 to $5.52 per share.

Total stock compensation cost for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $272 thousand and $293 thousand, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, the Corporation received $128 thousand from the exercise of stock options. There were no tax benefits recognized related to stock compensation cost for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.  

In accordance with ASU 2016-09 – Compensation – Stock Compensation (ASU 2016-09), forfeitures are recognized as they occur instead of applying an estimated forfeiture rate to each grant. For purposes of the determination of stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2019, we did not recognize any forfeitures of shares of stock options that were granted to officers and other employees.

As of December 31, 2019, there was $350 thousand of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options. This cost will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.14 years.

84

Table of Contents

(14)Income Taxes

The components of the federal and state income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

2019

    

2018

Federal:

 

 

 

 

Current

$

3,287

 

2,413

Deferred

 

(489)

 

(288)

 

 

2,798

 

2,125

State:

 

 

 

 

Current

 

249

 

207

Deferred

 

(14)

 

(5)

 

 

235

 

202

Totals

$

3,033

 

2,327

 

A reconciliation of the statutory income tax at 21% to the income tax expense included in the statement of operations is as follows for 2019 and 2018, respectively:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2019

    

2018

 

Federal income tax at statutory rate

$

2,838

    

21.0

%  

2,203

    

21.0

%

State tax expense, net of federal benefit

 

186

 

1.4

 

160

 

1.5

 

Tax exempt interest

 

(65)

 

(0.5)

 

(92)

 

(0.9)

 

Bank owned life insurance

 

(61)

 

(0.5)

 

(63)

 

(0.6)

 

Incentive stock options

 

66

 

0.5

 

52

 

0.5

 

Other

 

69

 

0.5

 

67

 

0.6

 

Effective income tax rate

$

3,033

 

22.4

%  

2,327

 

22.1

%

 

The components of the net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

$

2,111

 

1,802

Litigation reserve

 

 

220

 

 —

Intangibles

 

 

58

 

74

Accrued incentive compensation

 

 

176

 

 —

Accrued retirement

 

 

432

 

380

Unrealized loss on available for sale securities

 

 

 2

 

118

Deferred rent

 

 

142

 

155

Mortgage repurchase reserve

 

 

16

 

15

Other

 

 

78

 

169

Total deferred tax asset

 

 

3,235

 

2,713

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

 

(388)

 

(524)

Loan servicing rights

 

 

(183)

 

 —

Mortgage pipeline fair-value adjustment

 

 

(77)

 

(80)

Hedge instrument fair-value adjustment

 

 

(41)

 

(16)

Prepaid expenses

 

 

(152)

 

(131)

Deferred loan costs

 

 

(279)

 

(234)

Total deferred tax liability

 

 

(1,120)

 

(985)

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

2,115

 

1,728

 

85

Table of Contents

The effective tax rates for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were 22.4% and 22.1% respectively. The increase in rate from 22.1% to 22.4% between 2018 and 2019 was directly related to a decrease in the impact of tax exempt interest.

Under ASC 740, Income Taxes, the effect of income tax law changes on deferred taxes should be recognized as a component of income tax expense related to continuing operations in the period in which the law is enacted. This requirement applies not only to items initially recognized in continuing operations, but also to items initially recognized in other comprehensive income. During 2019 and 2018 we did not recognize income tax expense related to tax reform.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deferred tax assets.

As of December 31, 2019, the Corporation had an investment in low income housing tax credits of $1.5 million on which it recognized tax credits of $224 thousand, amortization of $245 thousand and tax benefits from losses of $33 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2019.

(15)Revenue from Contracts with Customers

All of the Corporation’s revenue from contracts with customers in the scope of FASB ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606), “Revenue for Contracts with Customers” (ASC 606) is recognized within noninterest income. The following table presents the Corporation’s noninterest income by revenue stream and reportable segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in accordance with ASC 606), and for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in accordance with ASC 605 – Revenue Recognition) as the Corporation adopted ASC 606 as of December 31, 2019. Items for the year ended December 31, 2019 outside the scope of ASC 606 are noted as such.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

(Dollars in thousands)

    

Bank

    

Wealth

    

Mortgage

    

Total

    

Bank

    

Wealth

    

Mortgage

    

Total

Non-interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage banking income (1)

 

$

268

 

 —

 

25,899

 

26,167

 

$

124

 

 —

 

26,063

 

26,187

Wealth management income

 

 

92

 

3,532

 

 —

 

3,624

 

 

200

 

3,717

 

 —

 

3,917

SBA income (1)

 

 

1,448

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,448

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Net change in fair values (1)

 

 

(29)

 

 —

 

518

 

489

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(368)

 

(368)

Earnings on investment in life insurance (1)

 

 

290

 

 —

 

 —

 

290

 

 

300

 

 —

 

 —

 

300

Gain on sale of securities (1)

 

 

165

 

 —

 

 —

 

165

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Dividends on FHLB stock (1)

 

 

430

 

 —

 

 —

 

430

 

 

168

 

 —

 

 —

 

168

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

 

110

 

 —

 

 —

 

110

 

 

115

 

 —

 

 —

 

115

Other  (2)

 

 

819

 

 —

 

(444)

 

375

 

 

1,058

 

 —

 

978

 

2,036

Non-interest income

 

$

3,593

 

3,532

 

25,973

 

33,098

 

$

1,965

 

3,717

 

26,673

 

32,355

 

(1)

Not within the scope of ASC 606.

(2)

Other operating non-interest income includes wire transfer fees, ATM/debit card commissions, and title fee income totaling $621 thousand and $530 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which are in the scope of ASC 606.

 

A description of the Corporation’s primary revenue streams accounted for under ASC 606 follows:

Wealth Management Income:  The Corporation earns wealth management fee income from investment advisory services provided to individual and 401k customers. Fees that are determined based on the market value of the assets held in their

86

Table of Contents

accounts are generally billed quarterly, in arrears, based on the market value of assets at the end of the previous billing period. Other related services that are based on a fixed fee schedule are recognized when the services are rendered. Fees that are transaction based, including trade execution services, are recognized at the point in time that the transaction is executed, i.e. the trade date. Included in other assets on the balance sheet is a receivable for wealth management fees that have been earned but not yet collected.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts: The Corporation earns fees from its deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees, which include services such as ATM use fees, stop payment charges, statement rendering, and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Corporation fulfills the customer’s request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Corporation satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the customer’s account balance.

Gains/Losses on Sales of OREO: The Corporation records a gain or loss from the sale of OREO when control of the property transfers to the buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed.  There were no such sales of OREO for the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2018.

 

(16)Transactions with Executive Officers, Directors and Principal Stockholders

The Corporation has had, and may be expected to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with its executive officers, directors, principal stockholders, their immediate families and affiliated companies (commonly referred to as related parties). Loans receivable from related parties totaled $3.7 million and $3.5 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Advances and repayments during 2019 totaled $8.7 million and $8.5 million respectively. Advances and repayments during 2018 totaled $5.6 million and $3.5 million respectively. Deposits of related parties totaled $20.2 million and $17.8 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Subordinated debt held by related parties totaled $519 thousand and $616 thousand at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The Corporation paid legal fees of $16 thousand and $32  thousand to a law firm of a director for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

(17)Financial Instruments with Off‑Balance Sheet Risk, Commitments and Contingencies

The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off‑balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.

The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on‑balance sheet instruments.

A summary of the Corporation’s financial instrument commitments at December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Commitments to grant loans and commitments under lines of credit

 

$

327,788

 

290,614

Letters of credit

 

 

9,750

 

5,158

 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Corporation evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case‑by‑case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon

87

Table of Contents

extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include personal or commercial real estate, accounts receivable, inventory and equipment.

Outstanding letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The majority of these standby letters of credit expire within the next twelve months. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending other loan commitments. The Corporation requires collateral supporting these letters of credit as deemed necessary. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of such collateral would be sufficient to cover the maximum potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The current amount of the liability as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issues is not material.

Included in commitments to grant loans are mortgage loan commitments of $72.9 million and $33.4 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively, which included interest rate lock commitments. These rate lock commitments represent an agreement to extend credit to a mortgage loan applicant whereby the interest rate on the loan is set prior to funding. The loan commitment binds the Corporation to lend funds to a potential borrower at the specified rate, regardless of whether interest rates change between the commitment date and the loan funding date. The Corporation’s loan commitments generally range between 30 and 90 days; however, the borrower is not obligated to obtain the loans. As such, these commitments are subject to interest rate risk and related price risk during the period from interest rate lock commitment through the loan funding date or expiration date. The Corporation economically hedges its mandatory sales channel using the forward sale of mortgage-backed securities, in addition to best-efforts forward sale commitments to substantially eliminate these risks. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Corporation had a notional amount of $62.8 million and $26.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Corporation had best efforts forward sale commitments to sell loans amounting to $18.6 million and $9.3 million, respectively. The Corporation is only obligated to settle the forward sale commitment if the loan closes in accordance with the terms of the interest rate lock commitment. The Corporation’s forward sale commitments generally expire within 90 days.

Loans sold under FHA or investor programs are subject to repurchase or indemnification if they fail to meet the origination criteria of those programs. In addition, loans sold to investors may be subject to repurchase or indemnification if the loan is two or three months delinquent during a set period that usually varies from the first six months to a year after the loan is sold. At December 31, 2019 there were no indemnification or repurchase requests pending. Although repurchases and losses have been infrequent, repurchase reserves of $71 thousand and $68 thousand were recorded as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. There were no such repurchases for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

(18)Recent Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are routinely defendants in or parties to pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. These actions and proceedings are generally based on alleged violations of banking, employment, contract and other laws. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for substantial monetary damages are asserted against the Corporation and its subsidiaries.  In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are also subject to regulatory and governmental examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries, investigations, and threatened legal actions and proceedings.  In connection with formal and informal inquiries by federal, state, and local agencies, the Corporation and its subsidiaries receive numerous requests, subpoenas and orders for documents, testimony and information in connection with various aspects of their activities.

On November 21, 2017, three former employees of the mortgage-banking division of the Bank filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Juan Jordan et al. v. Meridian Bank, Thomas Campbell and Christopher Annas, against the Bank purporting to be a class and collective action seeking unpaid and overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law, and the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act of 1968 on behalf of similarly situated plaintiffs. In September 2019, plaintiffs’ counsel and the Bank agreed to move forward with non-binding mediation.  Although the Bank believes it had strong and meritorious defenses, given the expense and inconvenience of  litigation, on July 24, 2019 through mediation, the Bank reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle this litigation for $990 thousand in total. The Bank had a litigation reserve of $990 thousand at December 31, 2019.  The parties submitted a negotiated settlement agreement to the court, and received final court

88

Table of Contents

approval on December 19, 2019. On February 29, 2020 the Bank made a payment, which included additional minor expenses, of $1.0 million in final settlement of this matter.

 

(19)Regulatory Matters

The Bank and the Corporation are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet the minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank and the Corporation must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off‑balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s and the Corporation’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk‑weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank and the Corporation to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk‑weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes, as of December 31, 2019, that the Bank and the Corporation meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2019, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank and the Corporation as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s and the Corporation’s category.

The Bank is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that it may declare and pay to the Corporation due to regulatory considerations. The Pennsylvania Banking Code provides that cash dividends may be declared and paid only out of accumulated net earnings.

The Banks’s and the Corporation’s actual capital amounts and ratios at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are presented below. The Corporation was not subject to these regulatory capital requirements as of December 31, 2018 and therefore the presentation below is for Bank only as of December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be well capitalized under

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For capital adequacy

 

prompt corrective action

 

 

Actual

 

purposes *

 

provisions

(dollars in thousands)

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

$

166,471 

 

16.10%

 

$

108,576 

 

10.50%

 

$

103,405 

 

10.00%

Bank

 

 

166,360 

 

16.09%

 

 

108,571 

 

10.50%

 

 

103,401 

 

10.00%

Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

 

115,934 

 

11.21%

 

 

72,384 

 

7.00%

 

 

67,214 

 

6.50%

Bank

 

 

154,881 

 

14.98%

 

 

72,381 

 

7.00%

 

 

67,211 

 

6.50%

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

 

115,934 

 

11.21%

 

 

87,895 

 

8.50%

 

 

82,724 

 

8.00%

Bank

 

 

154,881 

 

14.98%

 

 

87,891 

 

8.50%

 

 

82,721 

 

8.00%

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

 

115,934 

 

10.55%

 

 

43,973 

 

4.00%

 

 

54,966 

 

5.00%

Bank

 

 

154,881 

 

14.08%

 

 

44,013 

 

4.00%

 

 

55,017 

 

5.00%

 

89

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018 - as revised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be well capitalized under

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For capital adequacy

 

prompt corrective action

 

 

Actual

 

purposes *

 

provisions

(dollars in thousands):

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

122,262

 

13.66%

 

$

71,585

 

8.00%

 

$

89,481

 

10.00%

Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.72%

 

 

40,266

 

4.50%

 

 

58,163

 

6.50%

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.72%

 

 

53,689

 

6.00%

 

 

71,585

 

8.00%

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

 

 

104,881

 

11.16%

 

 

37,581

 

4.00%

 

 

46,977

 

5.00%

*     Does not include capital conservation buffer of 1.250% for 2019 and 1.875% for 2018

(20)Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

The Corporation uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities. The fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Corporation’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation techniques or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

In accordance with this guidance, the Corporation groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

Level 1 – Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Valuation is based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The valuation may be based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 – Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

90

Table of Contents

 

 

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

(dollars in thousands)

    

Total

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

Securities available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. asset backed securities

 

$

11,866

 

 —

 

11,866

 

 —

U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities

 

 

5,497

 

 —

 

5,497

 

 —

U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

35,223

 

 —

 

35,223

 

 —

State and municipal securities

 

 

6,270

 

 —

 

6,270

 

 —

Investments in mutual funds

 

 

1,009

 

 —

 

1,009

 

 —

Mortgage loans held-for-sale

 

 

33,704

 

 —

 

33,704

 

 —

Mortgage loans held-for-investment

 

 

10,546

 

 —

 

10,546

 

 —

Mortgage servicing rights

 

 

446

 

 —

 

 —

 

446

SBA loan servicing rights

 

 

337

 

 —

 

 —

 

337

Interest rate lock commitments

 

 

504

 

 —

 

 —

 

504

Customer derivatives - Interest rate swaps

 

 

382

 

 —

 

382

 

 —

Total

 

$

105,784

 

 —

 

104,497

 

1,287

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

(dollars in thousands)

    

Total

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

Securities available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities

 

$

23,866

 

 —

 

23,866

 

 —

U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

14,664

 

 —

 

14,664

 

 —

State and municipal securities

 

 

10,919

 

 —

 

10,919

 

 —

Investments in mutual funds and other equity securities

 

 

979

 

 —

 

979

 

 —

Mortgage loans held-for-sale

 

 

37,695

 

 —

 

37,695

 

 —

Mortgage loans held-for-investment

 

 

11,422

 

 —

 

11,422

 

 —

Mortgage servicing rights

 

 

213

 

 —

 

 —

 

213

Interest rate lock commitments

 

 

310

 

 —

 

 —

 

310

Customer derivatives - Interest rate swaps

 

 

141

 

 —

 

141

 

 —

Total

 

$

100,209

 

 —

 

99,686

 

523

 

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

(dollars in thousands)

    

Total

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

Impaired loans (1)

 

$

7,307

 

 —

 

 —

 

7,307

Other real estate owned (2)

 

 

120

 

 —

 

 —

 

120

Total

 

$

7,427

 

 —

 

 —

 

7,427

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

(dollars in thousands)

    

Total

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

Impaired loans (1)

 

$

5,799

 

 —

 

 —

 

5,799

Other real estate owned (2)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Total

 

$

5,799

 

 —

 

 —

 

5,799


91

Table of Contents

(1)

Impaired loans are those in which the Corporation has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third‑party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

 

(2)

Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure are to be sold and are carried at fair value less estimated cost to sell. Fair value is based upon independent market prices or appraised value of the property. These assets are included in Level 3 fair value based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Appraised values may be discounted based on management’s expertise, historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and/or estimated costs to sell.

Below is management’s estimate of the fair value of all financial instruments, whether carried at cost or fair value on the Corporation’s balance sheet. The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Corporation since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Corporation’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments:

(a)          Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short‑term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.

(b)          Securities

The fair value of securities available‑for‑sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

 (c)          Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale

The fair value of loans held for sale is based on secondary market prices.

(d)          Loans Receivable

The fair value of loans receivable is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate‑risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value below is reflective of an exit price.

(e)          Mortgage Loans Held-for-Investment

The fair value of mortgage loans held for investment is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data.

(f)           Loan Servicing Rights

The Corporation estimates the fair value of mortgage servicing rights and SBA servicing rights using discounted cash flow models that calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The model uses readily available prepayment speed assumptions for the interest rates of the portfolios serviced. These servicing rights are classified within Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy based upon management’s assessment of the inputs. The Corporation reviews the servicing rights portfolios on a quarterly basis for impairment.

92

Table of Contents

(g)          Impaired Loans

Impaired loans are those in which the Corporation has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third‑party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

(h)           Restricted Investment in Bank Stock

The carrying amount of restricted investment in bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

(i)          Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

(j)          Deposit Liabilities

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed‑rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

(k)           Short‑Term Borrowings

The carrying amounts of short‑term borrowings approximate their fair values.

(l)           Long‑Term Debt

Fair values of FHLB advances and the acquisition purchase note payable are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

(m)        Subordinated Debt

Fair values of junior subordinated debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on market rates currently offered on such debt with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.

(n)         Off‑Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

Off-balance sheet instruments are primarily comprised of loan commitments, which are generally priced at market at the time of funding. Fees on commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit are deemed to be immaterial and these instruments are expected to be settled at face value or expire unused. It is impractical to assign any fair value to these instruments and as a result they are not included in the table below. Fair values assigned to the notional value of interest rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts are based on market quotes.

(o)          Derivative Financial Instruments

The fair value of forward commitments and interest rate swaps is based on market pricing and therefore are considered Level 2.  Derivatives classified as Level 3 consist of interest rate lock commitments related to mortgage loan commitments. The determination of fair value includes assumptions related to the likelihood that

93

Table of Contents

a commitment will ultimately result in a closed loan, which is a significant unobservable assumption. A significant increase or decrease in the external market price would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

Hierarchy Level

    

amount

    

Fair value

    

amount

    

Fair value

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

Level 1

 

$

39,371

 

39,371

 

23,952

 

23,952

Securities available-for-sale

 

Level 2

 

 

58,856

 

58,856

 

50,428

 

50,428

Securities held-to-maturity

 

Level 2

 

 

8,780

 

9,003

 

12,741

 

12,655

Equity investments

 

Level 2

 

 

1,009

 

1,009

 

 —

 

 —

Mortgage loans held-for-sale

 

Level 2

 

 

33,704

 

33,704

 

37,695

 

37,695

Loans receivable, net

 

Level 3

 

 

954,164

 

973,057

 

818,631

 

820,512

Mortgage loans held-for-investment

 

Level 2

 

 

10,546

 

10,546

 

11,422

 

11,422

Interest rate lock commitments

 

Level 3

 

 

504

 

504

 

310

 

310

Forward commitments

 

Level 2

 

 

 6

 

 6

 

 —

 

 —

Restricted investment in bank stock

 

Level 3

 

 

8,072

 

8,072

 

7,002

 

7,002

Mortgage servicing rights

 

Level 3

 

 

446

 

446

 

232

 

213

SBA loan servicing rights

 

Level 3

 

 

337

 

337

 

 —

 

 —

Accrued interest receivable

 

Level 3

 

 

3,148

 

3,148

 

2,889

 

2,889

Customer derivatives - Interest rate swaps

 

Level 2

 

 

382

 

382

 

141

 

141

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

Level 2

 

 

851,168

 

880,400

 

752,130

 

744,300

Short-term borrowings

 

Level 2

 

 

123,676

 

123,678

 

114,300

 

114,300

Long-term debt

 

Level 2

 

 

3,123

 

3,123

 

6,238

 

6,240

Subordinated debentures

 

Level 2

 

 

40,962

 

40,962

 

9,239

 

9,396

Accrued interest payable

 

Level 2

 

 

1,088

 

1,088

 

305

 

305

Interest rate lock commitments

 

Level 3

 

 

157

 

157

 

40

 

40

Forward commitments

 

Level 2

 

 

119

 

119

 

176

 

176

Customer derivatives - Interest rate swaps

 

Level 2

 

 

431

 

431

 

161

 

161

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

Off-balance sheet financial instruments:

    

 

    

amount

    

Fair value

    

amount

    

Fair value

  Commitments to extend credit

 

Level 2

 

$

327,788

 

504

 

290,614

 

310

  Letters of credit

 

Level 2

 

 

9,750

 

 —

 

5,158

 

 —

 

 

The following table includes a rollforward of interest rate lock commitments for which the Corporation utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

 

2019

    

2018

Balance at beginning of the period

$

310

 

344

(Decrease) increase in value

 

194

 

(34)

Balance at end of the period

$

504

 

310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Valuation Techniques for Level 3 interest rate lock

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Unobservable

 

Range of

 

Weighted

 

commitments as of December 31, 2019

  

Level 3

  

Valuation Technique

  

Input

  

Inputs

  

Average

  

Interest rate lock commitments

 

504

 

Market comparable pricing

 

Pull through

 

1 - 99

91.70

94

Table of Contents

 

Losses of $78 thousand and gains of $40 thousand due to changes in the fair value of interest rate lock commitments which are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, are recorded in non-interest income as net change in the fair value of derivative instruments in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of income.

(21)Derivative Financial Instruments

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives

The Corporation is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions.  The Corporation principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Corporation manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and the use of derivative financial instruments.  Specifically, the Corporation enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates.  The Corporation’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Corporation’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Corporation’s loan portfolio. 

Mortgage Banking Derivatives

In connection with its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation enters into commitments to originate certain fixed rate residential mortgage loans for customers, also referred to as interest rate locks. In addition, the Corporation enters into forward commitments for the future sales or purchases of mortgage-backed securities to or from third-party counterparties to hedge the effect of changes in interest rates on the values of both the interest rate locks and mortgage loans held for sale. Forward sales commitments may also be in the form of commitments to sell individual mortgage loans or interest rate locks at a fixed price at a future date. The amount necessary to settle each interest rate lock is based on the price that secondary market investors would pay for loans with similar characteristics, including interest rate and term, as of the date fair value is measured. Interest rate lock commitments and forward commitments are recorded within other assets/liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, with changes in fair values during the period recorded within net change in the fair value of derivative instruments on the unaudited consolidated statements of income.

Customer Derivatives – Interest Rate Swaps

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from a service the Corporation provides to certain customers to swap a fixed rate product for a variable rate product, or vice versa.  The Corporation executes interest rate derivatives with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies.  Those interest rate derivatives are simultaneously hedged by offsetting derivatives that the Corporation executes with a third party, such that the Corporation minimizes its net interest rate risk exposure resulting from such transactions.  As the interest rate derivatives associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer derivatives and the offsetting derivatives are recognized directly in earnings. 

95

Table of Contents

The following table presents a summary of the notional amounts and fair values of derivative financial instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

(dollars in thousands)

Balance Sheet Line Item

 

Notional
Amount

    

Asset
(Liability)
Fair Value

    

Notional
Amount

    

Asset
(Liability)
Fair Value

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Positive fair values

Other assets

 

$

47,660

 

504

 

27,188

 

310

Negative fair values

Other liabilities

 

 

22,663

 

(157)

 

6,218

 

(40)

Total

 

 

 

70,323

 

347

 

33,406

 

270

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward Commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Positive fair values

Other assets

 

 

4,500

 

 6

 

 —

 

 —

Negative fair values

Other liabilities

 

 

58,250

 

(119)

 

26,500

 

(176)

Total

 

 

 

62,750

 

(113)

 

26,500

 

(176)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer Derivatives - Interest Rate Swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Positive fair values

Other assets

 

 

3,271

 

382

 

3,330

 

141

Negative fair values

Other liabilities

 

 

3,271

 

(431)

 

3,330

 

(161)

Total

 

 

 

6,541

 

(49)

 

6,660

 

(20)

Total derivative financial instruments

 

 

$

139,614

 

185

 

66,566

 

74

 

Interest rate lock commitments are considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, while the forward commitments and interest rate swaps are considered Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents a summary of the fair value gains and losses on derivative financial instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

$

77

 

(40)

Forward Commitments

 

63

 

(101)

Customer Derivatives - Interest Rate Swaps

 

(29)

 

(20)

Net fair value gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments

$

111

 

(161)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized gains/(losses) on derivatives were $(816) thousand and $627 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and are included in other non-interest income in the consolidated statements of income.

(22)Segments

ASC Topic 280 – Segment Reporting identifies operating segments as components of an enterprise which are evaluated regularly by the Corporation’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, our Chief Executive Officer, in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Corporation has applied the aggregation criterion set forth in this codification to the results of its operations.

Our Banking segment consists of commercial and retail banking. The Banking segment generates interest income from its lending (including leasing) and investing activities and is dependent on the gathering of lower cost deposits from its branch network or borrowed funds from other sources for funding its loans, resulting in the generation of net interest income. The Banking segment also derives revenues from other sources including gains on the sale of available for sale investment securities, gains on the sale of residential mortgage loans, service charges on deposit accounts, cash sweep fees, overdraft fees, BOLI income, title insurance fees, and other less significant non-interest income.

Meridian Wealth, a registered investment advisor and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, provides a comprehensive array of wealth management services and products and the trusted guidance to help its clients and our banking customers prepare for the future. The unit generates non-interest income through advisory fees.

96

Table of Contents

Meridian’s mortgage banking segment (“Mortgage”) consists of one central loan production facility and several retail and profit sharing loan production offices located throughout the Delaware Valley. The Mortgage segment originates 1 – 4 family residential mortgages and sells nearly all of its production to third party investors. The unit generates net interest income on the loans it originates and holds temporarily, then earns fee income (primarily gain on sales) at the time of the sale.  The unit also recognizes income from document preparation fees, changes in portfolio pipeline fair values and related net hedging gains.

The table below summarizes income and expenses, directly attributable to each business line, which has been included in the statement of operations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

(Dollars in thousands)

    

Bank

    

Wealth

    

Mortgage

    

Total

    

Bank

    

Wealth

    

Mortgage

    

Total

Net interest income

 

$

36,019

 

65

 

252

 

36,336

 

$

31,807

 

289

 

561

 

32,657

Provision for loan losses

 

 

901

 

 —

 

 —

 

901

 

 

1,577

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,577

Net interest income after provision

 

 

35,118

 

65

 

252

 

35,435

 

 

30,230

 

289

 

561

 

31,080

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage banking income

 

 

268

 

 —

 

25,899

 

26,167

 

 

124

 

 —

 

26,063

 

26,187

Wealth management income

 

 

92

 

3,532

 

 —

 

3,624

 

 

200

 

3,717

 

 —

 

3,917

SBA income

 

 

1,448

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,448

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Net change in fair values

 

 

(29)

 

 —

 

518

 

489

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(368)

 

(368)

Other

 

 

1,814

 

 —

 

(444)

 

1,370

 

 

1,641

 

 —

 

978

 

2,619

Non-interest income

 

 

3,593

 

3,532

 

25,973

 

33,098

 

 

1,965

 

3,717

 

26,673

 

32,355

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

 

16,408

 

2,194

 

16,555

 

35,157

 

 

13,803

 

1,897

 

19,094

 

34,794

Occupancy and equipment

 

 

2,166

 

126

 

1,514

 

3,806

 

 

2,114

 

131

 

1,534

 

3,779

Professional fees

 

 

1,494

 

18

 

1,102

 

2,614

 

 

1,709

 

21

 

432

 

2,162

Advertising and promotion

 

 

1,502

 

347

 

626

 

2,475

 

 

1,197

 

432

 

726

 

2,355

Other

 

 

6,362

 

580

 

4,025

 

10,967

 

 

5,285

 

752

 

3,818

 

9,855

Non-interest expense

 

 

27,932

 

3,266

 

23,822

 

55,019

 

 

24,108

 

3,233

 

25,604

 

52,945

Operating Margin

 

$

10,780

 

331

 

2,403

 

13,514

 

$

8,087

 

773

 

1,630

 

10,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

1,112,862

 

5,234

 

31,923

 

1,150,019

 

$

951,224

 

6,146

 

40,110

 

997,480

 

 

(23)Recent Accounting Pronouncements

As an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”), the Bank is permitted an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards affecting public companies. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the end of the fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of $1,070,000,000 or more, (ii) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt and (iv) the end of the fiscal year in which the market value of our equity securities that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 of that year. We have elected to take advantage of this extended transition period, which means that the financial statements included herein, as well as any financial statements that we file in the future, will not be subject to all new or revised accounting standards generally applicable to public companies for the transition period for so long as we remain an emerging growth company or until we affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period under the JOBS Act. If we do so, we will prominently disclose this decision in the first periodic report following our decision, and such decision is irrevocable. As a filer under the JOBS Act, we will implement new accounting standards subject to the effective dates required for non-public entities.

97

Table of Contents

Adopted Pronouncements in 2019:

FASB ASU 2014‑09 (Topic 606), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”

The Corporation adopted ASU 2014-09 and all subsequent amendments to the ASU (collectively, “ASC 606”), which (i) creates a single framework for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers that fall within its scope and (ii) revises when it is appropriate to recognize a gain (loss) from the transfer of nonfinancial assets, such as OREO. The majority of the Corporation’s revenues come from interest income and other sources, including loans, leases, investment securities and derivatives, that are outside the scope of ASC 606. The Corporation’s services that fall within the scope of ASC 606 are presented within noninterest income and are recognized as revenue as the Corporation satisfies its obligation to the customer. Services within the scope of ASC 606 include wealth management fee income, service charges on deposits, and the net gain on sale of OREO. Refer to Note 15, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion on the Corporation’s accounting policies for revenue sources within the scope of ASC 606. The Corporation adopted ASC 606 on December 31, 2019 using the modified retrospective method.  The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements and required the Corporation to make the revenue disclosures as detailed in note 15.

FASB ASU 2017-05 (Topic 610), “Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets”

Issued in February 2017, ASU 2017-05 provides clarification of the scope of ASC 610-20. Specifically, the new guidance clarifies that ASC 610-20 applies to nonfinancial assets which do not meet the definition of a business or not-for-profit activity. Further, the new guidance clarifies that a financial asset is within the scope of ASC 610-20 if it meets the definition of an in-substance nonfinancial asset which is defined as a financial asset promised to a counterparty in a contract where substantially all of the assets promised are nonfinancial. Finally, the new guidance clarifies that each distinct nonfinancial asset and insubstance nonfinancial asset should be derecognized when the counterparty obtains control of it. The Corporation adopted this ASU on December 31, 2019 at the same time we adopted ASU 2014-09. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

FASB ASU 2016‑15 (Topic 230), “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”

Issued in August 2016, ASU 2016‑15 provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues and their disclosure in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The issues addressed include debt prepayment, settlement of zero-coupon debt, contingent consideration in business combinations, proceeds from settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from settlement of BOLI, distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the Predominance principle. ASU 2016‑15 is effective for public companies for the annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. For non-public companies ASU 2016‑15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Corporation adopted ASU 2016-15 on December 31, 2019.  Upon the adoption of this ASU the Corporation recorded $98 thousand from the prepayment of subordinated debt as a financing activity in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019 instead of as an operating activity.  

FASB ASU 2016‑01 (Subtopic 825‑10), “Financial Instruments – Overall, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”

The Corporation adopted ASU 2016-01 which requires that equity investments be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The Corporation’s equity investments with a readily determinable fair value are currently included within equity securities and are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. In connection with the adoption of this ASU, the Corporation elected the practicability exception to fair value measurement for investments in equity securities without a readily determinable fair value (other than our Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock, which are outside of the scope of this ASU). Under the practicability exception, the investments are measured at cost, less impairment, plus or minus observable price changes (in orderly transactions) of an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. The adoption of this ASU did not have a

98

Table of Contents

material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Additionally, upon adoption of this ASU we continued to disclose the fair value of loans using an “exit price”.

Pronouncements Not Effective as of December 31, 2019:

FASB ASU 2017‑01 (Topic 805), “Business Combinations”

Issued in January 2017, ASU 2017‑01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. ASU 2017‑01 is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 including interim periods within those periods, while for non-public companies the ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2020 did not have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

FASB ASU 2016‑13 (Topic 326), “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”

Issued in June 2016, ASU 2016‑13 significantly changes how companies measure and recognize credit impairment for many financial assets. This ASU requires businesses and other organizations to measure the current expected credit losses (“CECL”) on financial assets, such as loans, net investments in leases, certain debt securities, bond insurance and other receivables.  The amendments affect entities holding financial assets and net investments in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. Current GAAP requires an incurred loss methodology for recognizing credit losses that delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. The amendments in this ASU replace the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonableness and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. An entity should apply the amendments through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (modified retrospective approach). Acquired credit impaired loans for which the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 310-30 has been previously applied should prospectively apply the guidance in this ASU.  A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized before the effective date. ASU 2016‑13 is effective for public companies for the annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. For non-public companies the ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2022, or January 1, 2023 for the Corporation.  The Corporation will adopt ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2023 and is currently determining under which method.  The Corporation has assembled a cross-functional team from Finance, Credit, and IT that is leading the implementation efforts to evaluate the impact of this guidance on the Corporation's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, internal systems, accounting policies, processes and related internal controls.  At this time the Corporation cannot yet estimate the impact to the consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments”

Issued in April 2019, ASU 2019-04 clarifies certain aspects of accounting for credit losses, hedging activities, and financial instruments (addressed by ASUs 2016-13, 2017-12, and 2016-01, respectively). The amendments to estimating expected credit losses (ASU 2016-13), in particular, how a company considers recoveries and extension options when estimating expected credit losses, are the most relevant to the Corporation. The ASU clarifies that (1) the estimate of expected credit losses should include expected recoveries of financial assets, including recoveries of amounts expected to be written off and those previously written off, and (2) that contractual extension or renewal options that are not unconditionally cancellable by the lender are considered when determining the contractual term over which expected credit losses are measured. Management will consider the impact of ASU 2019-04 when considering the impact of ASU 2016-13 as discussed above.

99

Table of Contents

FASB ASU 2016‑02 (Topic 842), “Leases”

Issued in February 2016, ASU 2016‑02 revises the accounting related to lessee accounting. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. The new lease guidance also simplifies the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. ASU 2016‑02 is effective for public companies for the first interim period within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. For non-public companies the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within the fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2020. In July 2018 ASU 2018-11 was issued which creates a new, optional transition method for implementing ASU 2016-02 and a lessor practical expedient for separating lease and non-lease components and has the same effective date as ASU 2016-02.  Under the optional transition method of ASU 2018-11, the Corporation may initially apply the new lease standard at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.  The Corporation will adopt ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2018-11 as of December 31, 2020 and apply ASC 840 throughout 2020.  The Corporation is evaluating the effects that ASU 2016‑02 and ASU 2018-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

FASB ASU 2017‑08 (Subtopic 310‑20), “Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310‑20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities”

Issued in March 2017, ASU 2017‑08 shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendment requires the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendment does not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. For non-public companies the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within the fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2020. The Corporation will adopt ASU 2017-08 as of December 31, 2020 and apply existing guidance throughout 2020.  The Corporation is evaluating the effect that ASU 2017‑08 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

FASB ASU 2017‑12 (Subtopic 815), “Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”

Issued in August 2017, ASU 2017‑12 better aligns hedge accounting with an organization’s risk management activities in the financial statements. In addition, the ASU simplifies the application of hedge accounting guidance in areas where practice issues exist. Specifically, the proposed ASU eases the requirements for effectiveness testing, hedge documentation and application of the shortcut and the critical terms match methods. Entities would be permitted to designate contractually specified components as the hedged risk in a cash flow hedge involving the purchase or sale of nonfinancial assets or variable rate financial instruments. In addition, entities would no longer separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. Also, entities, may choose refined measurement techniques to determine the changes in fair value of the hedged item in fair value hedges of benchmark interest rate risk. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020.  Early application is permitted in any interim period after issuance of the ASU for existing hedging relationships on the date of adoption and the effect of adoption should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption (that is, the initial application date). The Corporation has evaluated ASU 2017‑12, and has determined it has no current hedging strategies for which it plans to implement the ASU but we will consider the impact of the ASU on future hedging strategies that may arise.  The Corporation will adopt ASU 2017-12 as of December 31, 2020 and apply existing guidance throughout 2020.

FASB ASU 2018-16 (Subtopic 815), “Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes”

In October 2018 ASU 2018-16 was issued.  The new guidance applies to all entities that elect to apply hedge accounting to benchmark interest rate hedges under Topic 815. It permits the use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark

100

Table of Contents

interest rate for hedge accounting purposes in addition to the existing applicable rates. The guidance is required to be adopted concurrently with ASU 2017-12, on a prospective basis for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after adoption. The Corporation does not anticipate the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. 

FASB ASU 2018-07, “Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting”

Issued in June 2018, ASU 2018-07: Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), “Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting” expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. An entity should apply the requirements of Topic 718 to nonemployee awards except for specific guidance on inputs to an option pricing model and the attribution of cost (that is, the period of time over which share-based payment awards vest and the pattern of cost recognition over that period). The amendments specify that Topic 718 applies to all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The amendments also clarify that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) financing to the issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

The amendments in this update become effective for us January 1, 2020. The adoption will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as the Corporation has not historically granted share based payment awards to nonemployees other than to the Corporation’s Board of Directors, who are treated as employees for share-based payment accounting.

FASB ASU 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement Disclosure Framework"

Issued in August 2018, ASU 2018-13 modifies, adds and removes certain disclosures aimed to improve the overall usefulness of the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for the Corporation on January 1, 2020. Adoption is required on both a prospective and retrospective basis depending on the amendment. Management does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

FASB ASU 2018-15 (Topic 350), "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software"

Issued in August 2018, ASU 2018-15 provides clarity on capitalizing and expensing implementation costs for cloud computing arrangements in a service contract. If an implementation cost is capitalized, the cost should be recognized over the noncancellable term and periodically assessed for impairment. The guidance is effective in annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021. Adoption should be applied retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as we currently do not have any such cloud computing arrangements.

FASB ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”

Issued in December 2019, ASU 2019-12 adds new guidance to simplify accounting for income taxes, changes the accounting for certain income tax transactions and makes minor improvements to the codification. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. Management has not yet determined what the impact of the adoption of this ASU will be on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

101

Table of Contents

(24)Parent Company Financial Statements

The condensed financial statements of the Corporation (parent company only) are presented below. These statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

A. Condensed Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

Cash and due from banks

 

$

148

 

 —

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

148

 

 —

Investments in subsidiaries

 

 

159,643

 

109,867

Other assets

 

 

40

 

 —

Total assets

 

$

159,831

 

109,867

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Subordinated debentures

 

 

39,058

 

 —

Accrued interest payable

 

 

78

 

 —

Total liabilities

 

 

39,136

 

 —

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $1 par value. Authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 6,406,795 and 6,392,287 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

 

 

6,408

 

6,407

Surplus

 

 

80,196

 

79,919

Treasury Stock

 

 

(3)

 

 —

Retained earnings

 

 

34,097

 

23,931

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(3)

 

(390)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

120,695

 

109,867

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

159,831

 

109,867

 

B. Condensed Statements of Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

Dividends from subsidiaries

 

$

 —

 

 —

Net interest and other income

 

 

 —

 

 —

Total operating income

 

 

 —

 

 —

Expenses

 

 

81

 

 —

Income before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 

 

(81)

 

 —

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 

 

10,562

 

8,163

Income before income taxes

 

 

10,481

 

8,163

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

 —

 

 —

Net income

 

 

10,481

 

8,163

Total other comprehensive income

 

 

387

 

(92)

Total comprehensive income

 

$

10,868

 

8,071

 

102

Table of Contents

C. Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31, 

(dollars in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Net income

 

$

10,481

 

8,163

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 

 

(10,562)

 

(8,163)

Increase in accrued interest payable

 

 

78

 

 

Decrease (increase) in other assets

 

 

(40)

 

 —

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(43)

 

 —

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in subsidiaries

 

 

(38,804)

 

 —

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(38,804)

 

 —

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of long term subordinated debt

 

 

39,051

 

 —

Notes repaid (received) for common stock

 

 

(59)

 

 —

Net purchase of treasury stock through publicly announced plans

 

 

(3)

 

 —

Share based awards and exercises

 

 

 6

 

 —

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

38,995

 

 —

Net change in cash and cash equivalents 

 

 

148

 

 —

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

 —

 

 —

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

148

 

 —

 

 

 

(25)Subsequent Events

On March 7, 2019 the Corporation announced a stock repurchase plan (the “2019 Stock Repurchase Plan”) pursuant to which the Corporation may repurchase up to 5% of its common stock.  In March 2020 the Corporation repurchased 314,825 of its own outstanding common shares at an average price of $18.17 per common share. These purchases completed the share repurchases authorized by the 2019 Stock Repurchase Plan.

 

 

 

103

Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, with the participation of the Corporation’s President/Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule l3a-l5(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2019. Based on this evaluation, the Corporation’s President /Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, as of and for the end of the period covered by this report, that such disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective due to the Corporation’s late filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.  The Corporation attributes the delay in the filing by the prescribed date to the misinterpretation of our filing status as an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company, to be that of a non-accelerated filer instead of as an accelerated filer under applicable SEC rules.  We have since taken appropriate steps to remediate this deficiency in our disclosure controls and procedures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting identified during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

Design and Evaluation of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Pursuant to Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, the following is a report of management’s assessment of the design and effectiveness of our internal controls for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Corporation is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some amounts that are based on Management’s best estimates and judgments.

The Corporation’s Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation; provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; provide a reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation are only being made in accordance with authorizations of Management and directors of the Corporation; and provide a reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. The system of internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness by Management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits. Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are noted.

Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

104

Table of Contents

The Corporation’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the Corporation’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, in relation to the criteria for effective control over financial reporting as described in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013). Based on this assessment, Management concludes that, as of December 31, 2019, the Corporation’s system of internal control over financial reporting is effective.

KPMG, LLP, which is the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has not issued an attestation report on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as they are not yet required to do so as we do not yet meet the asset size requirements to require an internal controls audit.

 

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to information appearing in Meridian Corporation’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings, “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,”  “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE,” “CODE OF ETHICS,” “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,” and “AUDIT COMMITTEE.”

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the information appearing in Meridian Corporation’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings, “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION,” “SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE,” “OUTSTANDING AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE,” “EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE, EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS,” and “DIRECTOR COMPENSATION.”

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the information appearing in Meridian Corporation’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings, “EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION” and “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.”

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the information appearing in Meridian Corporation’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings, “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS” and “DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.”

 

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the information appearing in Meridian Corporation’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the heading, “PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE LLP AS THE CORPORATION’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2020.”

105

Table of Contents

 

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)  The following portions of the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements are set forth in Item 8 – “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”:

vii.      Consolidated Balance Sheets

viii.     Consolidated Statements of Income

ix.       Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

x.        Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

xi.       Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

xii.      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(a)(2) The financial statement schedules required by this Item are omitted because the information is either inapplicable, not required or is presented in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 

106

Table of Contents

(a)(3) The following exhibits are incorporated by reference herein or filed with this Form 10‑K:

Exhibit
Number

    

Description

2.1

 

Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated April 26, 2018 by and between Registrant, Bank and Meridian Interim Bank, filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K on August 24, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.1

 

Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K on August 24, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2

 

 

Bylaws of Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K on August 24, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference.

4.1

 

Description of Capital Securities

10.1

 

Meridian Bank 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 of the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed with the FDIC on September 29, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.2

 

Employment Agreement between Meridian Bank and Christopher Annas, effective January 30, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.2 of the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed with the FDIC on October 31, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.3

 

Amendement to Meridian Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K on March 12, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.4

 

Meridian Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.4 of the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed with the FDIC on September 29, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.5*

 

Asset Purchase Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.5 of the Amended Registration Statement on Form 10, filed with the FDIC on October 31, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.6

 

Meridian Bank 2004 Stock Option Plan, as amended June 15, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

21.1

 

List of Subsidiaries, filed as Exhibit 21.1 of the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed with the FDIC on September 29, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

31.1

 

Rule 13a‑14(a)/ 15d‑14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith.

31.2

 

Rule 13a‑14(a)/ 15d‑14(a) Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, filed herewith.

32

 

Section 1350 Certifications, filed herewith

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document


*Confidential treatment has been requested for certain information contained in this document pursuant to a letter filed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on October 31, 2017. Such Information has been omitted and filed separately with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

 

 

Item 16. Form 10‑K Summary

None.

107

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Meridian Bank

 

    

 

 

Date:    March 30, 2020

 

By:

/s/ Christopher J. Annas

 

 

 

Christopher J. Annas

 

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

 

 

Date: March 30, 2020

    

By:

/s/ Christopher J. Annas

 

 

 

Christopher J. Annas, Chairman of the Board

 

 

 

 

Date: March 30, 2020

 

By:

/s/ Denise Lindsay

 

 

 

Denise Lindsay, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

Date: March 30, 2020

 

By:

/s/ Robert M. Casciato

 

 

 

Robert M. Casciato, Director

 

 

 

 

Date: March 30, 2020

 

By:

/s/ George C. Collier

 

 

 

George C. Collier, Director

 

 

 

 

Date: March 30, 2020

 

By:

/s/ Robert T. Holland

 

 

 

Robert T. Holland, Director

 

 

 

 

Date: March 30, 2020

 

By:

/s/ Edward J. Hollin

 

 

 

Edward J. Hollin, Director

 

 

 

 

Date: March 30, 2020

 

By:

/s/ Anthony M. Imbesi

 

 

 

Anthony M. Imbesi, Director

 

 

 

 

Date: March 30, 2020

 

By:

/s/ Kenneth H. Slack

 

 

 

Kenneth H. Slack, Director

 

108