MICRON SOLUTIONS INC /DE/ - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[ x ] Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 or
[ ] Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______
001-9731
(Commission file No.)
ARRHYTHMIA RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 72-0925679 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
25 Sawyer Passway
Fitchburg, Massachusetts 01420
(Address of principal executive offices)
(978) 345-5000
(Issuer's telephone number, including area code)
Check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No__
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-Accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes __ No X
As of November 7, 2011 there were 2,790,514 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding.
ARRHYTHMIA RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2011
Exhibit 10.46 | Amendment 1 to the employment agreement between James E. Rouse and the Company dated September 30th, 2011 | X-5 | ||
Exhibit 10.47 | Amendment 1 to the employment agreement between David A. Garrison and the Company dated September 30th, 2011 | X-6 | ||
Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X-1 | ||
Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X-2 | ||
Exhibit 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X-3 | ||
Exhibit 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X-4 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
ARRHYTHMIA RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
ASSETS | September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||
Current assets: | (Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,445,115 | $ | 3,962,454 | |||
Trade and other accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $43,496 and $83,976 | 4,811,442 | 3,819,361 | |||||
Inventories, net | 2,730,818 | 3,069,177 | |||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 355,000 | 44,000 | |||||
Prepaid tax | 94,905 | 166,694 | |||||
Deposits, prepaid expenses and other current assets | 430,915 | 397,010 | |||||
Total current assets | 10,868,195 | 11,458,696 | |||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $9,989,038 and $9,101,732 | 7,447,154 | 6,691,817 | |||||
Goodwill | 1,564,966 | 1,564,966 | |||||
Other intangible assets, net | 136,726 | 96,446 | |||||
Restricted cash | — | 517,571 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 20,017,041 | $ | 20,329,496 | |||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 2,016,804 | $ | 2,280,992 | |||
Accrued expenses | 715,479 | 275,197 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 2,732,283 | 2,556,189 | |||||
Long term liabilities: | |||||||
Long term deferred tax liability, net | 387,965 | 330,000 | |||||
Long term portion of deferred gain on lease | 14,518 | 17,868 | |||||
Total long term liabilities | 402,483 | 347,868 | |||||
Total liabilities | 3,134,766 | 2,904,057 | |||||
Shareholders’ equity: | |||||||
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized, none issued | — | — | |||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 3,926,491 shares issued, 2,790,514 outstanding | 39,265 | 39,265 | |||||
Additional paid-in-capital | 10,738,595 | 10,653,210 | |||||
Common stock held in treasury, 1,135,977 shares at cost | (3,099,842 | ) | (3,099,842 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive income from foreign currency translation | 51,849 | 42,502 | |||||
Retained earnings | 9,152,408 | 9,790,304 | |||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 16,882,275 | 17,425,439 | |||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 20,017,041 | $ | 20,329,496 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
1
ARRHYTHMIA RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 6,788,974 | $ | 5,888,277 | $ | 18,990,368 | $ | 17,255,916 | |||||||
Cost of sales | 5,455,531 | 4,605,683 | 15,254,373 | 13,894,697 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 1,333,443 | 1,282,594 | 3,735,995 | 3,361,219 | |||||||||||
Selling and marketing | 450,910 | 259,831 | 1,224,440 | 673,457 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 885,214 | 749,396 | 2,684,057 | 2,025,255 | |||||||||||
Research and development | 125,573 | 76,189 | 313,437 | 179,000 | |||||||||||
Total expense | 1,461,697 | 1,085,416 | 4,221,934 | 2,877,712 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (128,254 | ) | 197,178 | (485,939 | ) | 483,507 | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 4,241 | (2,450 | ) | (970 | ) | 142,319 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (124,013 | ) | 194,728 | (486,909 | ) | 625,826 | |||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | (50,000 | ) | 75,200 | (185,485 | ) | 185,000 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (74,013 | ) | $ | 119,528 | $ | (301,424 | ) | $ | 440,826 | |||||
Net income (loss) per share – basic | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.16 | |||||
Net income (loss) per share – diluted | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.16 | |||||
Weighted average common shares Outstanding – basic | 2,790,514 | 2,790,514 | 2,790,514 | 2,719,724 | |||||||||||
Weighted average common shares Outstanding – diluted | N/A | 2,820,834 | N/A | 2,769,049 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
2
ARRHYTHMIA RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional paid-in capital | Treasury stock | Accumulated other comprehensive income | Retained earnings | Comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | 3,926,491 | $ | 39,265 | $ | 10,653,210 | $ | (3,099,842 | ) | $ | 42,502 | $ | 9,790,304 | $ | 17,425,439 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 9,347 | 9,347 | $ | 9,347 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share based compensation | 85,385 | 85,385 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends | (336,472 | ) | (336,472 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | (301,424 | ) | (301,424 | ) | (301,424 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss | $ | (292,077 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 | 3,926,491 | $ | 39,265 | $ | 10,738,595 | $ | (3,099,842 | ) | $ | 51,849 | $ | 9,152,408 | $ | 16,882,275 | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
ARRHYTHMIA RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (301,424 | ) | $ | 440,826 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Non-cash gain from bargain purchase | — | (146,288 | ) | ||||
Amortization of the gain on lease | (3,350 | ) | — | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,166,666 | 1,070,175 | |||||
Share based compensation | 85,385 | 79,041 | |||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | (40,480 | ) | 19,000 | ||||
Deferred tax expense | (253,035 | ) | (84,000 | ) | |||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Trade and other accounts receivable | (951,601 | ) | (328,538 | ) | |||
Inventories | 338,359 | (190,970 | ) | ||||
Deposits, prepaid expenses and other assets | 37,884 | (325,575 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 176,096 | 314,084 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 254,500 | 847,755 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
Capital expenditures, net of disposals | (1,962,285 | ) | (1,080,418 | ) | |||
Cash released from restrictions | 517,571 | — | |||||
Acquisitions | — | 16,357 | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (1,444,714 | ) | (1,064,061 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
Cash dividend paid | (336,472 | ) | (336,461 | ) | |||
Net cash used in financing activities | (336,472 | ) | (336,461 | ) | |||
Effect of currency translation on cash and cash equivalents | 9,347 | 18,134 | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (1,517,339 | ) | (534,633 | ) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 3,962,454 | 3,674,179 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 2,445,115 | $ | 3,139,546 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation:
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. ("ART") and subsidiaries (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on March 23, 2011.
The information presented reflects, in the opinion of the management of the Company, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial results for the interim period presented.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year.
2. Inventories:
Inventories consist of the following as of: | September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||
Raw materials | $ | 878,113 | $ | 911,440 | |||
Work-in-process | 307,155 | 169,063 | |||||
Finished goods | 1,545,550 | 1,988,674 | |||||
Total | $ | 2,730,818 | $ | 3,069,177 |
The value of silver in inventory at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 as a part of finished goods as plated sensors, work in process, or raw material was $752,149 and $617,154, respectively. Inventories are stated net of a reserve for slow moving or obsolete inventory.
3. Share-Based Compensation:
The Company accounts for non-cash share based compensation under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 718 “Stock Compensation”, which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of ASC 718, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant).
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Key input assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the exercise price of the award, the expected option term, the expected volatility of the Company’s stock over the option’s expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the option’s expected term, and the Company’s expected annual dividend yield. The Company believes that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the Company’s stock options. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by persons who receive equity awards.
The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $23,521 and $22,030 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and $85,385 and $79,041 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Two grants totaling 160,000 options to 9 persons, including directors and management, were made during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Grants totaling 135,500 options were made in the first nine months of 2010 of which, 60,000 non-qualified options were outside of the Company’s stock option plan in conjunction with business combination activities, of which 20,000 are currently exercisable.
5
The following is a weighted average of the assumptions used to estimate the fair market value of options granted using the Black Scholes valuation method:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |
Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 1.26% |
Expected Volatility | 31.24% | 46.48% |
Risk Free Interest Rate | 0.98% | 1.2% |
Expected Option Terms (in years) | 5 | 5 |
Share-based Incentive Plan
At September 30, 2011, the Company has two stock option plans that includes both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to be granted to certain eligible employees, non-employee directors, or consultants of the Company. The 2001 Plan has 236,500 options outstanding; however, has been closed for new grants. The 2010 Plan has 160,000 options outstanding and the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance is 500,000 shares. The options granted have six or ten year contractual terms and either vest immediately or vest annually over a five-year term.
The following table presents the average price and contractual life information about options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2011:
Exercise Price | Number of Outstanding Shares | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) | Options Currently Exercisable | Average Fair Value at Grant Date | ||||||||
$ | 3.41 | 75,500 | 4.26 | 15,100 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||
4.76 | 60,000 | 3.71 | 20,000 | 1.77 | ||||||||
5.73 | 90,000 | 9.68 | — | 1.30 | ||||||||
7.15 | 96,000 | 2.26 | 57,600 | 2.74 | ||||||||
9.86 | 63,000 | 0.22 | 63,000 | 4.22 | ||||||||
9.86 | 70,000 | 9.63 | — | 0.50 | ||||||||
12.42 | 10,000 | 0.85 | 10,000 | 5.38 | ||||||||
23.10 | 10,000 | 1.43 | 8,000 | 10.77 | ||||||||
474,500 | 173,700 |
The aggregated intrinsic value of options outstanding and vested at September 30, 2011 was $0. The Company expects 244,490 or 81.3% of the 300,800 unvested options to vest over their remaining life.
The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s non-vested options since December 31, 2010:
Non-Vested Options | ||||||
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Fair Value | |||||
Non-vested at December 31, 2010 | 184,100 | $ | 1.98 | |||
Granted | 160,000 | 0.95 | ||||
Vested | (43,300 | ) | 2.50 | |||
Forfeited | — | |||||
Non-vested at September 30, 2011 | 300,800 | $ | 1.36 |
At September 30, 2011, there was $259,125 of total unrecognized cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.92 years.
6
4. Income Taxes:
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 “Income Taxes,” which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The periods from 2008 to 2010 remain open to examination by the IRS and state jurisdictions. The Company believes it is not subject to any significant tax risks related to uncertain tax positions. The Company does not have any accrued interest or penalties associated with any unrecognized tax benefits, nor were any interest expenses recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
5. Earnings per share:
In accordance with ASC 260, the basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding if the potential shares had been issued and if the additional shares were dilutive. At September 30, 2011, 173,700 stock options were anti-dilutive and are excluded from the three and nine months in the earnings per share computation.
6. RMDDx Acquisition:
On June 18, 2010, the Company, through a newly created Delaware subsidiary named RMDDxUSA Corp., purchased all of the outstanding shares of RMDDx Corporation (“RMDDx”), a Prince Edward Island corporation. The shares were exchanged for 115,033 shares of ART common stock and options to purchase 60,000 shares at $4.76. These shares and options were immediately placed in escrow and are released and vested based upon the achievement of certain performance targets. The performance targets require client contracts, service volumes and gross sales with minimum gross margins. On October 15, 2010, the first performance target was met, 28,758 shares of stock were released from escrow and 20,000 options are vested. On October 18, 2011, the second performance target was missed, and will require an adjustment to equity.
RMDDxUSA Corp. is the U.S. sales and distribution operations entity for, and parent of, RMDDx.
RMDDx is a medical device and diagnostic service company dedicated to the development and commercialization of medical devices, medical information technology, medical diagnostics and patient monitoring through wireless, internet and telecommunication technologies. Since inception, the efforts have been devoted to the development of remote wireless medical technology for heart monitors.
The fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition on June 18, 2010 is as follows:
Assets | |||
Current Assets | $ | 17,357 | |
Fixed Assets | 83,381 | ||
Deferred Tax Assets | 165,872 | ||
Other Assets | 512,483 | ||
Total Assets | $ | 779,093 | |
Liabilities | |||
Current Liabilities | $ | 82,254 | |
Total Liabilities | $ | 82,254 |
RMDDx has a deferred tax asset related to losses prior to the close of the transaction. The deferred tax asset is for Canadian and Provincial corporate income taxes.
7
RMDDx had $510,833 in cash which was restricted as it collateralized a guarantee on a stand-by letter of credit related to a Canadian Federal contracting economic incentive program involving an unrelated third party. The restriction was lifted during the second quarter of 2011 when the Company secured a $1,000,000 letter of credit to replace the guarantee by the Province of Prince Edward Island. Using the judgment of management in the fair market valuation required by ASC 805 “Business Combinations”, over the next 5 years the targets of the incentive program are expected to be achieved. These calculations and the associated assumptions are the basis for not including a liability related to the guarantee on the Balance Sheet. As of September 30, 2011, management has not booked a reserve for this performance requirement. This guarantee, secured by the Company's letter of credit, is reviewed by management for impairment. The Province of Prince Edward Island, through an economic incentive program, has paid expense reimbursements exceeding $220,000 to the Company in the form of a labor and equipment rebates.
The common stock was issued from treasury, and the options were issued outside of the Company's existing stock option plan. The fair value of the options was determined by using the Black Scholes valuation methods described in Note 3. The fair value of the equity issued was determined based on the probability of the management of RMDDx meeting the performance targets required for the release and vesting of shares and options. In compliance with ASC 805-30-30-1, a fair value of the equity was determined to be $550,551 and was calculated by discounting the targets outside of a 12 month period with an estimate of the probability of attainment. The determination of probabilities was made using the same assumptions used throughout the purchase accounting.
In compliance with FASB ASC 805-30-25-2, this transaction was deemed a “bargain purchase” with the resulting gain of $146,288 booked as other income in the quarter ended June 30, 2010. This increase to other income offsets the general and administrative costs related to the transaction of approximately $80,000. As defined by ASC 805-30-25, the purchase of RMDDx was not a forced sale in which the seller acted under compulsion. The discount to fair value relates to the sellers belief in the future value of the combined entity exceeding the current value of the consideration.
7. Recent Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income” (“Update 2011-05”), revises the manner in which companies present comprehensive income in their financial statements. This ASU requires companies to report the components of comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement would present the components of net income, similar to the Company’s current Consolidated Statements of Operations, while the second statement would include the components of other comprehensive income (OCI), as well as a cumulative total for comprehensive income. This ASU does not change the items that must be reported in OCI. ASU 2011-05 must be applied retrospectively and is effective for the first quarter of 2012. Management is in the process of evaluating the presentation options required by this ASU.
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-07, “Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation and Disclosure of Patient Service Revenue, Provision for Bad Debts and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for Certain Health Care Entities” (“Update 2011-07”). Update 2011-07 requires certain health care entities to change the presentation in their statement of operations by reclassifying the provision for bad debts associated with patient service revenue from an expense to a deduction from patient service revenue (net of contractual allowances and discounts). Additionally, those health care entities are required to provide enhanced disclosure about their policies for recognizing revenue and assessing bad debts. The amendments also require disclosures of patient service revenue (net of contractual allowances and discounts) as well as qualitative and quantitative information about changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts. Update 2011-07 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Management is in the process of evaluating the effects of Update 2011-07 on the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-08, "Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment" ("Update 2011-08"). Update 2011-08 amends existing guidance by giving an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If this is the case, companies will need to perform a more detailed two-step goodwill impairment test which is used to identify potential goodwill impairments and to measure the amount of goodwill impairment losses to be recognized, if any. ASU 2011-08 will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, which for the company is the first quarter of 2012. Management does not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
8
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Any forward looking statements made herein are based on current expectations of the Company that involve a number of risks and uncertainties and should not be considered as guarantees of future performance. These statements are made under the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plans,” “predict,” or “will”. Although the Company believes that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will materialize. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward looking statements. Several of these factors include, without limitation: our ability to maintain our current pricing model and/or decrease our cost of sales; our ability to increase sales of higher margin products and services; variations in the mix of products and services sold; variability of customer delivery requirements; ability to license our software, provide timely customization and updates; ability to successfully market WirelessDx services, manage the timing of investment in operational infrastructure and ability to accelerate the pace of revenues from customer implementation; a stable interest rate market and/or a stable currency rate environment in the world, and specifically the countries where we are doing business; continued availability of supplies or materials used in manufacturing at competitive prices; volatility in commodity and energy prices; the Company's ability to offset higher costs with price increases; adverse regulatory developments in the U.S. or any other country the Company plans to do business in; entrance of competitive products and services in the Company's markets; the ability of management to execute plans and motivate personnel in the execution of those plans; no adverse publicity related to the Company and/or its products; adverse claims relating to the Company's intellectual property; adoption of new, or changes in, accounting principles; passage of new, or changes in, regulations; legal proceedings; ability to maintain compliance with the NYSE Amex requirements for continued listing of our common stock; the costs inherent with complying with statutes and regulations applicable to public reporting companies, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; the Company's ability to efficiently integrate acquisitions and other new lines of business that the Company may enter in the future, if any; and other risks referenced from time to time elsewhere in this report and in our filings with the SEC.
The Company is under no obligation and does not intend to update, revise or otherwise publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of any unanticipated events. More information about factors that potentially could affect the Company's financial results is included in the Company's filings with the SEC, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Overview
Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. (“ART”) is engaged in the licensing of medical software, which acquires data and analyzes electrical impulses of the heart to aid in the detection of potentially lethal arrhythmias. Micron Products, Inc. (“Micron”), a wholly owned subsidiary, is the primary source of consolidated revenues. This primary source of revenue relates to the manufacturing of components, devices and equipment primarily for the medical and defense industries. The single largest category of revenue relates to Micron’s production and sale of silver/silver chloride coated and conductive resin sensors used as component parts in the manufacture of integrated disposable electrophysiological sensors. These disposable medical devices are used worldwide in the monitoring of electrical signals in various medical applications. In an effort to leverage these skills, the Company has expanded into custom thermoplastic injection molded products with a full array of design, engineering and production services and management. With the addition of a medical machining cell, the Company began production of patient specific metal and plastic orthopedic devices. RMDDxUSA Corp. together with its subsidiary RMDDx Corporation (such subsidiaries collectively, "WirelessDx"), a wholly owned subsidiary of ART, provides medical software and services, respectively, to the medical industry. While not currently adding significant revenue to the results, management believes these businesses have significant potential for future growth of the Company. Management continues to identify complementary and/or synergistic products, technologies and lines of business in an effort to broaden the Company’s offerings.
9
Results of Operations
Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $6,788,974 versus $5,888,277 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $900,697 or 15%. Micron’s medical sensors and snaps with silver surcharge revenue increased by $1,839,000 and high volume precision molded products and other miscellaneous sales increased by $134,000. The increase in revenues from sensors and snaps is due to higher silver surcharge and a unit volume increase of 17% as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. Revenue from the Micron Integrated Technology’s (MIT) products decreased $902,000 due to decreased volume from the Company's defense industry customers and the planned completion of a significant program. The MIT division’s revenue is derived from custom molding, precision metal machining and mold making activities. Combined revenues from ART's software and WirelessDx services were $32,124 and $202,510 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $18,990,368 versus $17,255,916 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $1,734,452 or 10%. Micron’s medical sensors and snaps with silver surcharge revenue increased by $4,071,941 and high volume precision molded products and other miscellaneous sales increased by $283,038. The increase in revenues from sensors and snaps is due to higher silver surcharge and a 9% increase in per unit revenue due to a shift in product mix. Revenue from the Micron Integrated Technology’s (MIT) product life cycle management programs decreased $2,378,889. MIT’s revenue is derived from the custom molding, precision metal machining and mold making activities. The revenue decreases reflect lower volume of defense industry products that were partially offset by higher tooling sales. Combined revenues from ART's software and WirelessDx services were $60,873 and $302,510 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Revenue from domestic and foreign sales for the three and nine month periods is as follows:
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | % | 2010 | % | 2011 | % | 2010 | % | ||||||||||||||||
United States | $ | 2,571,442 | 38 | $ | 3,119,155 | 53 | $ | 7,494,626 | 39 | $ | 9,158,010 | 53 | |||||||||||
Canada | 2,031,183 | 30 | 1,373,442 | 23 | 6,388,472 | 34 | 4,128,142 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
Europe | 764,403 | 11 | 608,331 | 10 | 1,924,825 | 10 | 1,753,490 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Pacific Rim | 888,691 | 13 | 677,297 | 12 | 1,731,345 | 9 | 1,487,659 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 533,255 | 8 | 110,052 | 2 | 1,451,100 | 8 | 728,615 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 6,788,974 | 100% | $ | 5,888,277 | 100% | $ | 18,990,368 | 100% | $ | 17,255,916 | 100% |
The increase of sales in Canada, Europe and the Pacific Rim is due to increasing sensor revenue. The decrease of sales in United States is related to a reduction in defense industry products.
Cost of sales was $5,455,531 or 80% of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $4,605,683 or 78% of revenue for the same period in 2010. Cost of sales was $15,254,373 or 80% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $13,894,697 or 81% of revenue for the same period in 2010. The stabilization and reduction of costs remains a priority of management. The inability to increase our sensor prices in the competitive global marketplace hinders passing additional material and utility cost increases to our customers, excluding the escalating cost of silver. As silver increases in price, the additional cost is passed to customers in the form of a silver surcharge, resulting in a decreased gross margin as a percentage of sales. The increase in sensor margin in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 occurred despite the aforementioned escalating cost of silver. The improvements from automation and in process controls continue to positively contribute to gross profit. Management continues to investigate ways to improve the overall gross margin by focusing marketing efforts on higher margin products and investing in new technologies.
10
Selling and marketing expense was $450,910 or 7% of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $259,831 or 4% for the same period in 2010. The selling and marketing expense was $1,224,440 or 6% of sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $673,457 or 4% for the same period in 2010. The increase during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 includes increases of $498,000 and $47,000 in personnel and travel expenses related to the WirelessDx medical services and ART software new sales and marketing costs, respectively. The remainder of the increase in selling and marketing expense was associated with Micron's sensor business and MIT's custom products. When compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company added seven additional employees targeting the service markets, and one additional person in the software business unit. Selling expenses for WirelessDx is expected to continue to increase as the operations are scaled according to the Company's plans.
General and administrative expense was $885,214 or 13% of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $749,396 or 13% for the same period in 2010. The general and administrative expense was $2,684,057 or 14% of sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $2,025,255 or 12% for the same period in 2010. The increase during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 includes $484,000 associated with the administrative infrastructure for WirelessDx office, travel and other administrative expenses associated with this new entity. These expenses are expected to continue to increase as WirelessDx operations expand; however, decrease as a percentage of sales with the expected increase to revenue. The remainder of the increased expense includes higher personnel cost, legal, travel and other corporate expenses. As of the June 30, 2011 measurement date, the Company is not an accelerated filer; therefore, the expense related to auditor attestation for Section 404b of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will not be incurred in 2011.
Research and development expense was $125,573 or 2% of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $76,189 or 1% for the same period in 2010. The research and development expense was $313,437 or 2% of sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $179,000 or 1% in the same period in 2010. In 2011 and 2010, approximately 50% of the expense was related to ART’s SAECG software, Predictor®. Product testing and development costs continue in support of a National Institutes of Health research project utilizing ART’s proprietary Signal Averaged ECG products. This work includes the development of other complimentary products. The remaining portion of the research and development expense is associated with continued work on process improvements to Micron sensor and snap product line. This work is expected to continue through the end of 2011. Both areas of research and development have resulted in the filing of provisional patent applications.
Other income (expense), net was an income of $4,241 versus expense of $(2,450) for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Other income (expense), net was an expense of $(970) versus income of $142,319 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest income in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was offset by sale of assets totaling $3,314, supplier discounts taken of $7,361 and a loss in currency exchange of $17,356 associated with WirelessDx's Canadian operations. In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the acquisition of RMDDx resulted in a onetime non-cash gain of $146,288 in the period due to purchase accounting.
Income tax benefit as a percentage of loss before income taxes was 40% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to an effective rate of income tax provision of 39% for the same period in 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the effective rate of income tax benefit was 38% compared to income tax provision of 30% for the same period in 2010. The higher benefit rate is based on estimated utilization of operating losses in the near term. Management will continue to seek to implement any tax planning opportunities that could effectively reduce the Company’s income tax obligations in the future.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital was $8,135,912 at September 30, 2011 compared to $8,902,507 at December 31, 2010, a decrease of$766,595. Capital investment may decrease working capital with any significant investment resulting from future acquisition of capital assets or businesses, significant expansion of production capacity, or further software and product development.
Net capital expenditures were $1,962,285 for the first nine months of 2011 as compared to $1,080,418 for the same period in 2010. The largest portion of the capital expenditures in the first nine months of 2011 resulted from increased investment in medical devices used by the WirelessDx medical services business with the remainder being deployed for the routine replacement of production equipment and tooling on the Micron sensor product line. Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were made with cash on hand. The Company has made a commitment for a 200 KW solar installation with an approximate $1,000,000 cost at the Micron manufacturing facility. This installation is expected to reduce electricity consumption annually by approximately $30,000 while generating an estimated $120,000 in solar renewable energy credit income each year for the next ten years. The solar installation is expected to be completed by year end. The installation also qualifies for significant Federal and State tax credits.
11
The Company has an unsecured credit line with a large multinational bank which the Company increased from $2 million to $3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The agreement provides for borrowings up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus 50% of raw material and finished goods inventories. This facility has no borrowing base charge. The agreement contains covenants that apply upon drawing on the line. The covenants relate to various matters including notice prior to executing further borrowings and security interests, merger or consolidation, acquisitions, guarantees, sales of assets other than in the normal course of business, leasing, changes in ownership and payment of dividends. No funds have been drawn down on this line during the quarter ended September 30, 2011. Under this credit line, the Company has for the benefit of its subsidiary RMDDx secured a $1,000,000 letter of credit to replace the guarantee by the Province of Prince Edward Island. During the second quarter of 2011, this letter of credit lifted the restriction on $510,833 in restricted cash related to a performance guarantee and Canadian Federal contracting economic incentive program involving an unrelated third party.
During the first quarter of 2011 payment terms with our silver supplier were modified. This modification resulted in a negative impact of approximately $697,000 to cash flow from operations to date. The decrease in accounts payable resulting from the shorter payment terms with our silver supplier was done to offset an increase in material cost. At that time, the savings in cost of materials was greater than the cost of capital to the Company. Management has reviewed and modified this arrangement in the fourth quarter of 2011.
The Company expects to meet cash demands for its operations at current levels with current operating cash flows for the near future.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Board of Directors declared and paid a cash dividend of $0.06 per share for a total of $336,472. In the comparable period ended September 30, 2010, the Board of Directors declared and paid a cash dividend of $0.06 per share for a total of $336,461.
In October 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase in the open market from time to time of up to $650,000 of the Company’s outstanding stock. To date an aggregate of 36,199 shares were purchased under the program to date for an aggregate of $87,163. No purchases were made in the first nine months of 2011 or 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Certain of these significant accounting policies are considered to be critical accounting policies, as defined below.
A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the presentation of the Company’s financial statements and requires management to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, critical accounting estimates have the following attributes: 1) the Company is required to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate; and 2) different estimates the Company could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable in the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is obtained and as the Company’s operating environment changes. These changes have historically been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they became known. In addition, management is periodically faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within its control and will not be known for prolonged periods of time. These uncertainties are discussed in the section above entitled “Forward-looking Statements.” Based on a critical assessment of its accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, management believes that the Company’s consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and present a meaningful presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
12
Management believes that the following are critical accounting policies:
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable
The Company recognizes revenue upon product shipment or customer acceptance of completion of service provided, with persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the related receivable is reasonably assured. The acceptance of the service provided by RMDDx is the prearranged transmission of medical records into the customer owned database. The Company recognizes software license revenue upon completion of performance obligations by the Company and evidence of licenses transmitted from the control of the Company.
Products are shipped to the customer with the warranty that the product meets the mutually agreed specifications as detailed on the purchase order. Upon agreement within 90 days of shipment between the Company and customer that the product did not conform to the agreed upon specifications, a return is authorized, credited and product returned is replaced.
Based on management’s on-going analysis of accounts receivable balances, and after the initial recognition of the revenue, as to any event that adversely affects the ultimate ability to collect the related receivable, management will record an allowance for bad debts. Bad debts have not had a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share based compensation under ASC 718, “Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 requires that companies recognize and measure compensation expense for all share-based payments at the grant date based on the fair market value of the award. This share-based compensation expense must be included in the Company’s statement of operations over the requisite service period.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model which requires extensive use of financial estimates and accounting judgment, including the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock over the estimated term, and estimates on the expected time period that employees will retain their vested options prior to exercising them. The use of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different estimates of the fair value of the stock-based compensation and as a result, provide significantly different amounts recognized in the Company’s statement of income.
Inventory and Inventory Reserves
The Company values its inventory at the lower of average cost or market. The Company reviews its inventory for quantities in excess of production requirements, obsolescence and for compliance with internal quality specifications. Any adjustments to inventory would be equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated net market value based upon assumptions about future demand, market conditions and expected cost to distribute those products to market. Silver in its delivered form is priced at fair market value.
The Company maintains some reserve for excess, slow moving, and obsolete inventory. A review of inventory on hand is made at least annually and some obsolete inventory is scrapped and/or recycled. The review is based on several factors including a current assessment of future product demand, historical experience, and product expiration.
Deferred Tax Assets
The Company assesses its deferred tax assets based upon a more likely than not to be realized criteria. The Company considers future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. In accordance with ASC 740 we recognize the benefits of a tax position if that position is more likely than not to be sustained on audit, based on the technical merit of the position.
13
Asset Impairment – Goodwill
The Company reviews the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets to assess potential impairments. Management reassesses the useful lives of other intangible assets with identifiable useful lives in accordance with the guidelines set forth in ASC 350, “Intangible Assets”. The value assigned to intangible assets is determined by a valuation based on estimates and judgment regarding expectations for the success and life cycle of products previously acquired or others likely to be acquired in the future. If the actual sale of product and market acceptance differs significantly from the estimates, management may be required to record an impairment charge to write down the asset to its realizable value. To test for impairment, a present value of an estimate of future cash flows related to goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives are calculated and compared to the value of the intangible asset during the first quarter annually. When impairment exists it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. After the annual testing was completed as of March 31, 2011, no impairment of goodwill was required.
Asset Impairment – Long Lived Assets
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets and intangible assets with finite lives whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be fully recoverable. When the Company’s management determines that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable, management generally measures any impairment on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in its current business model.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks
Not applicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (“the Certifying Officers”), conducted evaluations of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined under Sections 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, the Certifying Officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management of the Company on a timely basis in order to comply with the Company’s disclosure obligations under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Further, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s third fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
14
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 7. Exhibits
(a) | Exhibits |
3.0 | Articles of Incorporation (a) |
3.1 | Amended and Restated By-laws(b) |
10.43* | Employment agreement between James E. Rouse and the company dated December 26th, 2006. (c) |
10.44* | Employment agreement between David A. Garrison and the Company dated January 1st, 2007. (d) |
10.45 | Lease agreement between RMDDxUSA and Brandywine Realty Trust dated December 16, 2011. (e) |
10.46* | Amendment 1 to the employment agreement between James E. Rouse and the company dated September 30th, 2011 on page X-5. |
10.47* | Amendment 1 to the employment agreement between David A. Garrison and the Company dated September 30th, 2011 on page X-6. |
31.1 | Certification of the CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a) on page X-1 |
31.2 | Certification of the CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a) on page X-2. |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on page X-3. |
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on page X-4. |
101.INS† | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH† | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL† | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF † | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB† | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE† | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
__________________________
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit. | |
† XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
(a) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-18 as filed with the Commission in April 1988, Registration Statement No. 33-20945-FW. |
(b) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission May 8, 2009. |
(c) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 8, 2006. |
(d) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-KSB for period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Commission in March of 2007. |
(e) | Incorporated by reference from the Company's Form 10-K for period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Commission in March of 2011. |
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ARRHYTHMIA RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC. | |
November 14, 2011 | By: /s/ James E. Rouse |
James E. Rouse | |
President and Chief Executive Officer | |
(Principal Executive Officer) | |
By: /s/ David A. Garrison | |
David A. Garrison | |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
16
Index to Exhibits
Number | Exhibit | Page |
31.1 | Certification of the CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a) | X-1 |
31.2 | Certification of the CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a) | X-2 |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X-3 |
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X-4 |
10.46* | Amendment 1 to the employment agreement between James E. Rouse and the Company dated September 30th, 2011 | X-5 |
10.47* | Amendment 1 to the employment agreement between David A. Garrison and the Company dated September 30th, 2011 | X-6 |
101.INS† | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH† | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL† | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF † | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB† | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit.
† XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
17