NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[x]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
|
[ ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
For the
transition period from ________ to ________
Commission
File Number 0-15204
NATIONAL
BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
54-1375874
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
101
Hubbard Street
P.
O. Box 90002
Blacksburg,
VA
|
24062-9002
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(540)
951-6300
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. [x] Yes [ ]
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). [x]
Yes [ ] No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated
filer [ ] Accelerated
filer [x] Non-accelerated
filer [ ] Smaller
reporting company [ ]
(Do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b–2 of the Exchange Act).
[ ]
Yes [x] No
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Common
Stock, $1.25 Par Value
|
Outstanding at July 30, 2010
6,933,474
|
(This
report contains 34 pages)
NATIONAL
BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form
10-Q
Index
Page
|
||
Item
1
|
3
|
|
3-4
|
||
5-6
|
||
7-8
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
10-11
|
||
|
||
12-20
|
||
Item
2
|
20-28
|
|
Item
3
|
28
|
|
Item
4
|
28
|
|
Item
1
|
28
|
|
Item
1A
|
28
|
|
Item
2
|
28
|
|
Item
3
|
29
|
|
|
||
Item
4
|
29
|
|
|
||
Item
5
|
29
|
|
Item
6
|
29
|
|
29
|
||
30-31
|
2
Financial
Information
Item
1. Financial Statements
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
$
in thousands, except per share data
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
12,609
|
$
|
12,894
|
||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
53,311
|
32,730
|
||||||
Securities
available for sale, at fair value
|
161,691
|
168,041
|
||||||
Securities
held to maturity (fair value approximates $134,946 at June 30, 2010 and
$129,892 at December 31, 2009)
|
132,893
|
129,376
|
||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
2,191
|
126
|
||||||
Loans:
|
||||||||
Real
estate construction loans
|
48,604
|
45,625
|
||||||
Real
estate mortgage loans
|
173,724
|
165,542
|
||||||
Commercial
and industrial loans
|
270,897
|
283,998
|
||||||
Loans
to individuals
|
90,702
|
95,844
|
||||||
Total
loans
|
583,927
|
591,009
|
||||||
Less
unearned income and deferred fees
|
(1,002
|
)
|
(1,062
|
)
|
||||
Loans,
net of unearned income and deferred fees
|
582,925
|
589,947
|
||||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(7,553
|
)
|
(6,926
|
)
|
||||
Loans,
net
|
575,372
|
583,021
|
||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
10,721
|
10,628
|
||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
6,023
|
6,250
|
||||||
Other
real estate owned, net
|
3,170
|
2,126
|
||||||
Intangible
assets and goodwill
|
12,084
|
12,626
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
24,810
|
24,549
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
994,875
|
$
|
982,367
|
||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$
|
125,694
|
$
|
122,549
|
||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
324,038
|
310,629
|
||||||
Savings
deposits
|
58,399
|
51,622
|
||||||
Time
deposits
|
351,206
|
367,312
|
||||||
Total
deposits
|
859,337
|
852,112
|
||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
356
|
336
|
||||||
Other
liabilities
|
7,357
|
7,843
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
867,050
|
860,291
|
||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
---
|
---
|
3
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value,
5,000,000 sharesauthorized;
|
||||||||
none
issued and outstanding
|
---
|
---
|
||||||
Common stock of $1.25 par
value.
|
||||||||
Authorized 10,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 6,933,474 shares in 2010 and in
2009
|
8,667
|
8,667
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
118,615
|
113,901
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net
|
543
|
(492
|
)
|
|||||
Total stockholders'
equity
|
127,825
|
122,076
|
||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity
|
$
|
994,875
|
$
|
982,367
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
$
in thousands, except per share data
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Interest
Income
|
||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
9,260
|
$
|
9,392
|
||||
Interest
on interest-bearing deposits
|
30
|
26
|
||||||
Interest
on securities – taxable
|
1,466
|
1,605
|
||||||
Interest
on securities – nontaxable
|
1,591
|
1,688
|
||||||
Total
interest income
|
12,347
|
12,711
|
||||||
Interest
Expense
|
||||||||
Interest
on time deposits of $100,000 or more
|
894
|
1,493
|
||||||
Interest
on other deposits
|
1,956
|
2,781
|
||||||
Total
interest expense
|
2,850
|
4,274
|
||||||
Net
interest income
|
9,497
|
8,437
|
||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
852
|
278
|
||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
8,645
|
8,159
|
||||||
Noninterest
Income
|
||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
772
|
837
|
||||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
54
|
83
|
||||||
Credit
card fees
|
760
|
712
|
||||||
Trust
income
|
261
|
261
|
||||||
BOLI
income
|
176
|
172
|
||||||
Other
income
|
89
|
117
|
||||||
Realized
securities gains (losses), net
|
11
|
(10
|
)
|
|||||
Total
noninterest income
|
2,123
|
2,172
|
||||||
Noninterest
Expense
|
||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
2,654
|
2,794
|
||||||
Occupancy
and furniture and fixtures
|
477
|
425
|
||||||
Data
processing and ATM
|
349
|
314
|
||||||
FDIC
assessment
|
269
|
885
|
||||||
Credit
card processing
|
584
|
538
|
||||||
Intangible
assets amortization
|
271
|
273
|
||||||
Net
costs of other real estate owned
|
27
|
11
|
||||||
Franchise
taxes
|
242
|
273
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
824
|
667
|
||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
5,697
|
6,180
|
||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
5,071
|
4,151
|
||||||
Income
tax expense
|
1,075
|
794
|
||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
3,996
|
$
|
3,357
|
||||
5
Basic
net income per share
|
$
|
0.58
|
$
|
0.48
|
||||
Fully
diluted net income per share
|
$
|
0.58
|
$
|
0.48
|
||||
Weighted
average number of common
|
||||||||
shares
outstanding – basic
|
6,933,474
|
6,932,023
|
||||||
Weighted
average number of common
|
||||||||
shares
outstanding – diluted
|
6,946,650
|
6,945,161
|
||||||
Dividends
declared per share
|
$
|
0.44
|
$
|
0.41
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
$
in thousands, except per share data
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Interest
Income
|
||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
18,436
|
$
|
18,854
|
||||
Interest
on interest-bearing deposits
|
49
|
50
|
||||||
Interest
on securities – taxable
|
2,909
|
3,166
|
||||||
Interest
on securities – nontaxable
|
3,193
|
3,219
|
||||||
Total
interest income
|
24,587
|
25,289
|
||||||
Interest
Expense
|
||||||||
Interest
on time deposits of $100,000 or more
|
1,840
|
2,984
|
||||||
Interest
on other deposits
|
3,989
|
5,701
|
||||||
Interest
on borrowed funds
|
---
|
1
|
||||||
Total
interest expense
|
5,829
|
8,686
|
||||||
Net
interest income
|
18,758
|
16,603
|
||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,499
|
648
|
||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
17,259
|
15,955
|
||||||
Noninterest
Income
|
||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
1,486
|
1,641
|
||||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
151
|
156
|
||||||
Credit
card fees
|
1,426
|
1,337
|
||||||
Trust
income
|
530
|
537
|
||||||
BOLI
income
|
361
|
353
|
||||||
Other
income
|
143
|
185
|
||||||
Realized
securities gains (losses), net
|
(3
|
)
|
70
|
|||||
Total
noninterest income
|
4,094
|
4,279
|
||||||
Noninterest
Expense
|
||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
5,510
|
5,625
|
||||||
Occupancy
and furniture and fixtures
|
968
|
894
|
||||||
Data
processing and ATM
|
706
|
636
|
||||||
FDIC
assessment
|
532
|
1,006
|
||||||
Credit
card processing
|
1,092
|
1,001
|
||||||
Intangible
assets amortization
|
542
|
551
|
||||||
Net
costs of other real estate owned
|
60
|
71
|
||||||
Franchise
taxes
|
481
|
445
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
1,590
|
1,581
|
||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
11,481
|
11,810
|
||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
9,872
|
8,424
|
||||||
Income
tax expense
|
2,107
|
1,680
|
||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
7,765
|
$
|
6,744
|
7
Basic
net income per share
|
$
|
1.12
|
$
|
0.97
|
||||
Fully
diluted net income per share
|
$
|
1.12
|
$
|
0.97
|
||||
Weighted
average number of common
|
||||||||
shares
outstanding – basic
|
6,933,474
|
6,930,756
|
||||||
Weighted
average number of common
|
||||||||
shares
outstanding – diluted
|
6,949,731
|
6,940,011
|
||||||
Dividends
declared per share
|
$
|
0.44
|
$
|
0.41
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
$
in thousands, except per share data
|
Common
Stock
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 8,662 | $ | 105,356 | $ | (3,910 | ) |
|
$ | 110,108 | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
--- | 6,744 | --- | $ | 6,744 | 6,744 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends
$0.41 per share
|
(2,843 | ) | (2,843 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
5 | 50 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on securities available for sale, net of income tax
$512
|
--- | --- | --- | 951 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Reclass
adjustment, net of tax $(19)
|
--- | --- | --- | (36 | ) | --- | ||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax $493
|
--- | --- | 915 | 915 | 915 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
--- | --- | --- | $ | 7,659 | --- | ||||||||||||||
Balances
at June 30, 2009
|
$ | 8,667 | $ | 109,307 | $ | (2,995 | ) | $ | 114,979 | |||||||||||
Balances
at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 8,667 | $ | 113,901 | $ | (492 | ) | $ | 122,076 | |||||||||||
Net
income
|
--- | 7,765 | --- | $ | 7,765 | 7,765 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends
$0.44 per share
|
(3,051 | ) | (3,051 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on securities available for sale, net of income tax
$555
|
--- | --- | --- | 1,032 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Reclass
adjustment, net of tax $2
|
--- | --- | --- | 3 | --- | |||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax $557
|
--- | --- | 1,035 | 1,035 | 1,035 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
--- | --- | --- | $ | 8,800 | --- | ||||||||||||||
Balances
at June 30, 2010
|
$ | 8,667 | $ | 118,615 | $ | 543 | $ | 127,825 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
9
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
$
in thousands
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 7,765 | $ | 6,744 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,499 | 648 | ||||||
Depreciation
of bank premises and equipment
|
446 | 462 | ||||||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
542 | 551 | ||||||
Amortization
of premiums and accretion of discounts, net
|
156 | 178 | ||||||
(Gains)
Losses on sales and calls of securities available for sale,
net
|
4 | (58 | ) | |||||
(Gains)
on calls of securities held to maturity, net
|
(1 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Losses and write-downs on other
real estate owned
|
1 | 44 | ||||||
Net
change in:
|
||||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
(2,065 | ) | (1,142 | ) | ||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
227 | (758 | ) | |||||
Other
assets
|
(777 | ) | (742 | ) | ||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
20 | (97 | ) | |||||
Other
liabilities
|
(486 | ) | 605 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
7,331 | 6,423 | ||||||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
||||||||
Net
change interest-bearing deposits
|
(20,581 | ) | (8,036 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from calls, principal payments, sales and maturities of securities
available for sale
|
32,416 | 15,414 | ||||||
Proceeds
from calls, principal payments and maturities of securities held to
maturity
|
15,968 | 28,231 | ||||||
Purchases
of securities available for sale
|
(24,625 | ) | (36,644 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of securities held to maturity
|
(19,534 | ) | (47,024 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of loan participations
|
--- | (13 | ) | |||||
Collections
of loan participations
|
2,671 | 596 | ||||||
Loan
originations and principal collections, net
|
1,851 | (1,612 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from disposal of other real estate owned
|
484 | 267 | ||||||
Recoveries
on loans charged off
|
99 | 32 | ||||||
Additions
to bank premises and equipment
|
(539 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(11,790 | ) | (48,921 | ) | ||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
|
||||||||
Net
change in time deposits
|
(16,106 | ) | 3,132 | |||||
Net
change in other deposits
|
23,331 | 40,882 | ||||||
Net
change in other borrowed funds
|
--- | (5 | ) | |||||
Cash
dividends
|
(3,051 | ) | (2,843 | ) | ||||
Stock
options exercised
|
--- | 55 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
4,174 | 41,221 | ||||||
Net
change in cash and due from banks
|
(285 | ) | (1,277 | ) | ||||
Cash
and due from banks at beginning of period
|
12,894 | 16,316 | ||||||
Cash
and due from banks at end of period
|
$ | 12,609 | $ | 15,039 |
10
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
||||||||
Interest
paid on deposits and borrowed funds
|
$ | 5,809 | $ | 8,783 | ||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$ | 2,881 | $ | 2,169 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Noncash Activities
|
||||||||
Loans
charged against the allowance for loan losses
|
$ | 971 | $ | 254 | ||||
Loans
transferred to other real estate owned
|
$ | 1,529 | $ | 196 | ||||
Unrealized
gains on securities available for sale
|
$ | 1,592 | $ | 1,408 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
11
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
June
30, 2010
(Unaudited)
$
in thousands, except per share data and % data
Note
1: General
The
consolidated financial statements of National Bankshares, Inc. (NBI) and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, The National Bank of Blacksburg (NBB) and National
Bankshares Financial Services, Inc. (NBFS) (collectively, the Company), conform
to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
to general practices within the banking industry. The accompanying interim
period consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion
of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which
are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements,
have been included. The results of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for
the full year or any other interim period. The interim period
consolidated financial statements and financial information included in this
Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the notes to consolidated financial
statements included in the Company’s 2009 Form 10-K. The Company
posts all reports required to be filed under the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 on its web site at www.nationalbankshares.com.
Subsequent
events have been considered through the date when the Form 10-Q was
issued.
Note
2: Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company had a stock option plan, the 1999 Stock Option Plan, that was adopted in
1999 and that was terminated on March 9, 2009. From 1999 to 2005, incentive
stock options were granted annually to key employees of NBI and its
subsidiaries. None have been granted since 2005. All of the
outstanding stock options are vested. Because there have been no options granted
in 2010 and all options were fully vested at December 31, 2008, there is no
expense included in net income for the periods presented.
Options
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2010
|
109,500 | $ | 22.14 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
--- | --- | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
--- | --- | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding
June 30, 2010
|
109,500 | $ | 22.14 | 4.99 | $ | 229 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2010
|
109,500 | $ | 22.14 | 4.99 | $ | 229 |
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, there were no stock options exercised.
During the first six months of 2009, 4,000 shares were exercised with an
intrinsic value of $42.
12
Note
3: Allowance
for Loan Losses, Nonperforming Assets and Impaired Loans
Six
Months ended
June
30,
|
Year
ended
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$ | 6,926 | $ | 5,858 | $ | 5,858 | ||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,499 | 648 | 1,634 | |||||||||
Loans
charged off
|
(971 | ) | (254 | ) | (647 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries
of loans previously charged off
|
99 | 32 | 81 | |||||||||
Balance
at the end of period
|
$ | 7,553 | $ | 6,284 | $ | 6,926 | ||||||
Ratio
of allowance for loan losses to the end of period loans, net of unearned
income and deferred fees
|
1.30 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.17 | % | ||||||
Ratio
of net charge-offs to average loans, net of unearned income and deferred
fees(1)
|
0.30 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.10 | % | ||||||
Ratio
of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans(2)
|
105.39 | % | 230.27 | % | 102.61 | % |
(1)
|
Net
charge-offs are on an annualized
basis.
|
(2)
|
The
Company defines nonperforming loans as total nonaccrual and restructured
loans. Loans 90 days past due and still accruing are
excluded.
|
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Nonperforming
assets:
|
||||||||||||
Nonaccrual
loans
|
$ | 7,167 | $ | 2,729 | $ | 4,098 | ||||||
Restructured
loans
|
--- | --- | 2,652 | |||||||||
Total
nonperforming loans
|
7,167 | 2,729 | 6,750 | |||||||||
Other
real estate owned, net
|
3,170 | 1,869 | 2,126 | |||||||||
Total
nonperforming assets
|
$ | 10,337 | $ | 4,598 | $ | 8,876 | ||||||
Ratio
of nonperforming assets to loans, net of unearned income and deferred
fees, plus other real estate owned
|
1.76 | % | 0.80 | % | 1.50 | % |
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Loans
past due 90 days or more and still accruing
|
$ | 389 | $ | 1,746 | $ | 1,697 | ||||||
Ratio
of loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing to loans, net of
unearned income and deferred fees
|
0.07 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.29 | % | ||||||
Impaired
loans:
|
||||||||||||
Total
impaired loans
|
$ | 6,586 | $ | 4,664 | $ | 7,680 | ||||||
Impaired
loans with a valuation allowance
|
$ | 6,586 | $ | 3,636 | $ | 7,630 | ||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(1,758 | ) | (1,128 | ) | (2,495 | ) | ||||||
Impaired
loans, net of allowance
|
$ | 4,828 | $ | 2,508 | $ | 5,135 | ||||||
Impaired
loans with no valuation allowance
|
$ | --- | $ | 1,028 | $ | 50 | ||||||
Average
recorded investment in impaired loans
|
$ | 6,927 | $ | 4,674 | $ | 7,851 | ||||||
Income
recognized on impaired loans
|
$ | --- | $ | 85 | $ | 169 | ||||||
Amount
of income recognized on a cash basis
|
$ | --- | $ | --- | $ | --- |
Nonaccrual
loans not subject to ASC 310-10 were $581 at June 30, 2010. There was no income
recognized for these loans.
13
Note
4: Securities
The
amortized costs, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair values
for securities available for sale by major security type as of June 30, 2010 are
as follows:
June
30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Costs
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Values
|
|||||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury
|
$ | 2,017 | $ | 180 | $ | --- | $ | 2,197 | ||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
56,712 | 958 | --- | 57,670 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
13,539 | 794 | --- | 14,333 | ||||||||||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
64,343 | 1,903 | 205 | 66,041 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
|
16,927 | 705 | --- | 17,632 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock
|
1,677 | --- | --- | 1,677 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank stock
|
92 | --- | --- | 92 | ||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
2,282 | --- | 233 | 2,049 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 157,589 | $ | 4,540 | $ | 438 | $ | 161,691 |
The
amortized costs, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair values
for securities held to maturity by major security type as of June 30, 2010 are
as follows:
June
30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Costs
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Values
|
|||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
$ | 21,070 | $ | 496 | $ | 2 | $ | 21,564 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
1,293 | 106 | --- | 1,399 | ||||||||||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
104,368 | 2,212 | 715 | 105,865 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
|
6,162 | 36 | 80 | 6,118 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 132,893 | $ | 2,850 | $ | 797 | $ | 134,946 |
Information
pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous loss position,
follows:
June
30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
|||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|||||||||||||
Temporarily
impaired securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
$ | --- | $ | --- | $ | 998 | $ | 2 | ||||||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
15,533 | 309 | 20,935 | 611 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
|
1,000 | --- | 1,920 | 80 | ||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
--- | --- | 260 | 233 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 16,533 | $ | 309 | $ | 24,113 | $ | 926 |
14
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
|||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|||||||||||||
Temporarily
impaired securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
$ | 42,876 | $ | 1,351 | $ | --- | $ | --- | ||||||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
28,537 | 571 | 13,382 | 698 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
|
662 | 1 | 3,517 | 483 | ||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
--- | --- | 277 | 217 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 72,075 | $ | 1,923 | $ | 17,176 | $ | 1,398 |
The Company had 58 securities with a
fair value of $40,646 which were temporarily impaired at June 30,
2010. The total unrealized loss on these securities was $1,235. Of
the temporarily impaired total, 39 securities with a fair value of $24,113 and
an unrealized loss of $926 have been in a continuous loss position for twelve
months or more. The Company has determined that these securities are temporarily
impaired at June 30, 2010 for the reasons set out below.
U.S. Government
agencies. The unrealized losses in this category of investments were
caused by interest rate fluctuations. The contractual terms of the investments
do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the cost
basis of each investment. Because the Company does not intend to sell any of the
investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required
to sell any of these investments before recovery of its amortized cost basis,
which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired.
States and political
subdivisions. This category’s unrealized losses are primarily the result
of interest rate fluctuations and also a certain few ratings downgrades brought
about by the impact of the economic downturn on states and political
subdivisions. The contractual terms of the investments do not permit the issuer
to settle the securities at a price less than the cost basis of each investment.
Because the Company does not intend to sell any of the investments and it is not
more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell any of the
investments before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity,
the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily
impaired.
Corporate debt
securities. The Company’s unrealized losses in corporate debt securities
are related to both interest rate fluctuations and ratings downgrades for a
limited number of securities. The contractual terms of the investments do not
permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the cost basis
of each investment. Because the Company does not intend to sell any of the
investments before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity,
the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily
impaired.
Other. The Company
holds an investment in an LLC and a small amount of community bank stock. The
value of these investments has been negatively affected by market conditions.
Because the Company does not intend to sell these investments before recovery of
amortized cost basis, the Company does not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired.
As a member of the Federal Reserve and
the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Atlanta, NBB is required to maintain
certain minimum investments in the common stock of those entities. Required
levels of investment are based upon NBB’s capital and a percentage of qualifying
assets. In addition, NBB is eligible to borrow from the FHLB with borrowings
collateralized by qualifying assets, primarily residential mortgage loans and
NBB’s capital stock investment in the FHLB. Redemption of FHLB stock is subject
to certain limitations and conditions. Management reviews for impairment based
upon the ultimate recoverability of the cost basis of the FHLB stock, and at
June 30, 2010 management did not consider there to be any
impairment.
Management
regularly monitors the credit quality of the investment portfolio. Changes in
ratings are noted and follow-up research on the issuer is undertaken when
warranted. Management intends to carefully follow any changes in bond quality.
Refer to “Securities” in this report for additional information.
Note
5: Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for
transfers of financial assets. The new guidance, which was issued as SFAS
No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to
SFAS No. 140”, was adopted into Codification in December 2009 through the
issuance of Accounting Standards Updated (“ASU”) 2009-16. The new standard
provides guidance to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and
comparability of the information that an entity provides in its financial
statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on
its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a
transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial
assets. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the variable interest
entities. The new guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 167,
“Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” was adopted into
Codification in December 2009. The objective of the guidance is to improve
financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and
to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial
statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective as of January 1, 2010. The
adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
15
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-15 (ASU
2009-15), “Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of
Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing.” ASU 2009-15 amends Subtopic
470-20 to expand accounting and reporting guidance for own-share lending
arrangements issued in contemplation of convertible debt issuance. ASU 2009-15
is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009 and
interim periods within those fiscal years for arrangements outstanding as of the
beginning of those fiscal years. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics –
Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. ASU 2010-04 makes technical
corrections to existing SEC guidance including the following topics: accounting
for subsequent investments, termination of an interest rate swap, issuance of
financial statements - subsequent events, use of residential method to value
acquired assets other than goodwill, adjustments in assets and liabilities for
holding gains and losses, and selections of discount rate used for measuring
defined benefit obligation. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, “Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair
Value Measurements.” ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing
disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to
guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU
2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and
for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the
new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-08,
“Technical Corrections to Various Topics.” ASU 2010-08 clarifies guidance on
embedded derivatives and hedging. ASU 2010-08 is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of the new
guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09,
“Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure
Requirements.” ASU 2010-09 addresses both the interaction of the
requirements of Topic 855 with the SEC’s reporting requirements and the intended
breadth of the reissuance disclosures provisions related to subsequent
events. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose
the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. ASU
2010-09 is effective immediately. The adoption of the new
guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In July
2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of
Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” The new
disclosure guidance will significantly expand the existing requirements and will
lead to greater transparency into a company’s exposure to credit losses from
lending arrangements. The extensive new disclosures of information as of
the end of a reporting period will become effective for both interim and annual
reporting periods ending after December 15, 2010. Specific items regarding
activity that occurred before the issuance of the ASU, such as the allowance
rollforward and modification disclosures, will be required for periods beginning
after December 15, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the impact
that ASU 2010-20 will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
Note
6: Defined Benefit Plan
Components of Net Periodic
Benefit Cost:
Pension
Benefits
|
||||||||
Six
Months ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 200 | $ | 176 | ||||
Interest
cost
|
344 | 330 | ||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(304 | ) | (264 | ) | ||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(50 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
Amortization
of net obligation at transition
|
(6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Recognized
net actuarial loss
|
124 | 168 | ||||||
Net periodic benefit
cost
|
$ | 308 | $ | 354 |
16
Employer
Contributions
NBI’s
required minimum pension plan contribution for 2010 is $585. The contribution is
being paid in quarterly installments.
Note
7: Fair Value Measurements
The Company records fair value
adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and determines fair value
disclosures utilizing a definition of fair value of assets and liabilities that
states that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. Additional considerations come into
play in determining the fair value of financial assets in markets that are not
active.
The Company uses a hierarchy of
valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques
are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained
from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market
assumptions. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy based on these two
types of inputs are as follows:
Level
1 –
|
Valuation
is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities.
|
||
Level
2 –
|
Valuation
is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets
for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-based valuation
techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from
or corroborated by observable data in the market.
|
||
Level
3 –
|
Valuation
is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs
or assumptions that are unobservable in the
market.
|
The
following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure
certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis in the financial statements:
Securities Available for
Sale
Securities available for sale are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based
upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are
not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation
techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions
are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third
party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair
value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider
observable market data (Level 2). The carrying value of restricted Federal
Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based upon
the redemption provisions of each entity and is therefore excluded from the
following table.
The following table presents the
balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of June 30, 2010:
Fair
Value Measurements
Using
|
|||||||||||||||||
Date
|
Description
|
Balance
|
Quoted
Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2010
|
Securities
available for sale
|
$ | 159,922 | $ | --- | $ | 159,922 | $ | --- | ||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
Securities
available for sale
|
166,272 | --- | 166,272 | --- |
Certain financial assets are measured
at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to
the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual
assets.
The following describes the valuation
techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets recorded at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:
Loans Held for
Sale
Loans held for sale are carried at the
lower of cost or market value. These loans currently consist of one-to-four
family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value
is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans
using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to
the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). As such, the Company
records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis. No nonrecurring fair
value adjustments were recorded on loans held for sale at June 30, 2010 or
December 31, 2009.. Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded within
income from mortgage banking on the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
17
Impaired
Loans
Loans are designated as impaired when,
in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is
probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement will not be collected. Troubled debt restructurings are impaired
loans. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on
either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the
collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing
the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets
including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of
the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined
utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted
by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable
market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the
process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over
two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business
equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net
book value on the applicable business’s financial statements if not considered
significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and
accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or
aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans allocated to the Allowance for Loan
Losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value
adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on
the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The following table summarizes the
Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis at June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009.
Carrying
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||
Date
|
Description
|
Balance
|
Quoted
Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2010
|
Impaired
loans net of valuation allowance
|
$ | 4,828 | $ | --- | $ | --- | $ | 4,828 | ||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
Impaired
loans net of valuation allowance
|
5,135 | --- | --- | 5,135 |
Other Real Estate
Owned
Certain assets such as other real
estate owned (OREO) are measured at fair value less cost to sell.
The following table summarizes the
Company’s other real estate owned that were measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009.
Carrying
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||
Date
|
Description
|
Balance
|
Quoted
Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2010
|
Other
real estate owned net of valuation allowance
|
$ | 1,297 | $ | --- | $ | --- | $ | 1,297 | ||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
Other
real estate owned net of valuation allowance
|
1,868 | --- | --- | 1,868 |
18
The
following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair
value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and Due from Banks,
Interest-Bearing Deposits, and Federal Funds Sold
The carrying amounts approximate fair
value.
Securities
The fair values of securities,
excluding restricted stock, are determined by quoted market prices or dealer
quotes. The fair value of certain state and municipal securities is not readily
available through market sources other than dealer quotations, so fair value
estimates are based on quoted market prices of similar instruments adjusted for
differences between the quoted instruments and the instruments being valued. The
carrying value of restricted securities approximates fair value based upon the
redemption provisions of the applicable entities.
Loans Held for
Sale
Fair values of loans held for sale are
based on commitments on hand from investors or prevailing market
prices.
Loans
Fair values are estimated for
portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated
by type such as commercial, real estate – commercial, real estate –
construction, real estate – mortgage, credit card and other consumer loans. Each
loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms
and by performing and nonperforming categories.
The fair value of performing loans is
calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity
using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate
risk inherent in the loan, as well as estimates for prepayments. The estimate of
maturity is based on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for
loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of
economic conditions on lending.
Fair value for significant
nonperforming loans is based on estimated cash flows which are discounted using
a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows.
Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows and discount rates are determined
within management’s judgment, using available market information and specific
borrower information.
Deposits
The fair value of demand and savings
deposits is the amount payable on demand. The fair value of fixed maturity term
deposits and certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently
offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.
Accrued
Interest
The carrying amounts of accrued
interest approximate fair value.
Commitments to Extend Credit
and Standby Letters of Credit
The only amounts recorded for
commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees
written are the deferred fees arising from these unrecognized financial
instruments. These deferred fees are not deemed significant at June 30, 2010 and
as such, the related fair values have not been estimated.
19
The estimated fair values, and related
carrying amounts, of the Company’s financial instruments are as
follows:
June
30, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Financial
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from
banks
|
$ | 12,609 | $ | 12,609 | $ | 12,894 | $ | 12,894 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
53,311 | 53,311 | 37,730 | 37,730 | ||||||||||||
Securities
|
294,584 | 296,637 | 297,417 | 297,933 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for
sale
|
2,191 | 2,191 | 126 | 126 | ||||||||||||
Loans, net
|
575,372 | 548,713 | 583,021 | 588,201 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest
receivable
|
6,023 | 6,023 | 6,250 | 6,250 | ||||||||||||
Financial
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 859,337 | 856,998 | $ | 852,112 | $ | 856,556 | |||||||||
Accrued interest
payable
|
356 | $ | 356 | 336 | 336 |
National
Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
$
in thousands, except per share data
The purpose of this discussion and
analysis is to provide information about the financial condition and results of
operations of National Bankshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Company), which are not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial
statements and other information included in this report. Please
refer to the financial statements and other information included in this report
as well as the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K for an understanding of the
following discussion and analysis.
Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
We make forward-looking statements in
this Form 10-Q that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties.
These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our profitability,
liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk,
growth strategy, and financial and other goals, and are based upon our
management’s views and assumptions as of the date of this report. The
words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,”
“contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” or other
similar words or terms are intended to identify forward-looking
statements.
These
forward-looking statements are based upon or are affected by factors that could
cause our actual results to differ materially from historical results or from
any results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
factors include, but are not limited to, changes in:
· interest
rates,
· general
economic conditions,
· the
legislative/regulatory climate,
·
|
monetary
and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S.
Treasury, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal
Reserve Board, and the impact of any policies or programs implemented
pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) and
other financial reform legislation,
|
·
|
the
effects of increased regulation of financial service companies and banks
as a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act of 2010,
|
· unanticipated
increases in the level of unemployment in the Company’s trade area,
· the
quality or composition of the loan and/or investment portfolios,
· demand
for loan products,
· deposit
flows,
· competition,
· demand
for financial services in the Company’s trade area,
· the real
estate market in the Company’s trade area,
20
· the
Company’s technology initiatives, and
· applicable
accounting principles, policies and guidelines.
These
risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking
statements contained in this report. We caution readers not to place undue
reliance on those statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the description
of our “Risk Factors” in Item 1A. of our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company was not negatively impacted
during the initial phases of the economic slowdown in late 2008. Its markets did
not experience the dramatic declines in real estate values seen in some other
areas of the country. In addition, the diverse economy of the Company’s market
area, including several large employers that are public colleges or
universities, helped to insulate the Company from the worst effects of the
recession. As the recession continued into 2009, real estate values in the
Company’s trade area declined moderately. In early 2010, the Company experienced
an increasing level of nonperforming assets, including nonperforming loans and
other real estate owned. If the economic recovery is slow or is reversed, it is
likely that unemployment will rise in the Company’s trade area. Because of the
importance to the Company’s markets of state-funded universities, cutbacks in
the funding provided by the State as a result of the recession could also
negatively impact employment. This could lead to an even higher rate of
delinquent loans and a greater number of real estate foreclosures. Higher
unemployment and the fear of layoffs causes reduced consumer demand for goods
and services, which negatively impacts the Company’s business and professional
customers. In conclusion, a slow economic recovery could have an adverse effect
on all financial institutions, including the Company.
Critical Accounting
Policies
General
The Company’s financial statements are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP). The financial information contained within our statements
is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of
the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A
variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained when earning
income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability.
The Company uses historical loss factors as one factor in determining the
inherent loss that may be present in the loan portfolio. Actual losses could
differ significantly from one previously acceptable method to another method.
Although the economics of the Company’s transactions would be the same, the
timing of events that would impact the transactions could
change.
Allowance for Loan
Losses
The allowance for loan losses is an
estimate of the losses that may be sustained in our loan portfolio. The
allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting. The first principle
requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and are
estimable. The second requires that losses be measured based on the differences
between the value of collateral and the loan balance using either the present
value of future cash flows, the observable market price of the loan
or the fair value of the collateral.
Our allowance for loan losses has two
basic components, allocated and general. Each of the components is determined
based upon estimates that can and do change when actual events occur. The
allocated component is determined by establishing an allowance on a loan-by-loan
basis for loans that are classified as impaired. The general allowance is
determined by utilizing historical loss experience to estimate credit losses for
groups of loans in the loan portfolio with similar characteristics. The general
allowance is then adjusted after considering qualitative or environmental
factors that are likely to cause estimated losses to differ from historical loss
experience. Loss estimates are inherently subjective, and our actual losses
could be greater or less than the estimates.
Core Deposit
Intangibles
Goodwill is subject to at least an
annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test. The
Company performs impairment testing in the fourth quarter. Additionally,
acquired intangible assets (such as core deposit intangibles) are separately
recognized if the benefit of the asset can be sold, transferred, licensed,
rented, or exchanged, and amortized over its useful life.
The Company amortizes intangible assets
arising from branch transactions over their useful life. Core deposit
intangibles are subject to a recoverability test based on undiscounted cash
flows, and to the impairment recognition and measurement provisions required for
other long-lived assets held and used.
Overview
National Bankshares, Inc. is a
financial holding company incorporated under the laws of Virginia. Located in
southwest Virginia, NBI has two wholly-owned subsidiaries, the National Bank of
Blacksburg and National Bankshares Financial Services, Inc. The National Bank of
Blacksburg, which does business as National Bank from twenty-five office
locations, is a community bank. NBB is the source of nearly all of the Company’s
revenue. National Bankshares Financial Services, Inc. does business as National
Bankshares Investment Services and National Bankshares Insurance Services.
Income from NBFS is not significant at this time, nor is it expected to be so in
the near future.
21
National
Bankshares, Inc. common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market and is
traded under the symbol “NKSH.”
Performance
Summary
The following table presents NBI’s key
performance ratios for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009.
June
30,
2010
|
December
31,
2009
|
|||||||
Return
on average assets
|
1.60 | % | 1.47 | % | ||||
Return
on average equity
|
12.41 | % | 12.23 | % | ||||
Basic
net earnings per share
|
$ | 1.12 | $ | 2.07 | ||||
Fully
diluted net earnings per share
|
$ | 1.12 | $ | 2.06 | ||||
Net
interest margin (1)
|
4.55 | % | 4.23 | % | ||||
Noninterest
margin (2)
|
1.52 | % | 1.55 | % |
(1)
|
Net
interest margin: Year-to-date tax-equivalent net interest income divided
by year-to-date average earning
assets.
|
(2)
|
Noninterest
margin: Noninterest income (excluding securities gains and losses) less
noninterest expense (excluding the provision for bad debts and income
taxes) divided by average year-to-date
assets.
|
The
return on average assets for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 1.60%, 13
basis points higher than the 1.47% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
return on average equity grew from 12.23% for the year ended December 31, 2009
to 12.41% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The net interest margin was a
healthy 4.55% at the end of the first half of 2010, up 32 basis points from the
4.23% reported at year-end. The primary factor driving the increase in the net
interest margin was the declining cost to fund interest-earning assets. Even
though the Company had a modest decline in the yield on earning assets for the
first half of 2010, the decline was more than offset by declining interest
expense.
The
noninterest margin remained relatively stable, decreasing 3 basis points from
1.55% at December 31, 2009 to 1.52% at June 30, 2010. The provision for loan
losses at the end of the first half of 2010 was $1,499, an increase of $851 from
the $648 at June 30, 2009. See the discussion of “Asset Quality” in this report
for additional information about the provision for loan losses.
Growth
NBI’s key growth indicators are shown
in the following table:
June
30, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||||
Securities
|
$ | 294,584 | $ | 297,417 | (0.95 | ) | % | ||||||
Loans,
net
|
575,372 | 583,021 | (1.31 | ) | % | ||||||||
Deposits
|
859,337 | 852,112 | 0.85 | % | |||||||||
Total
assets
|
994,875 | 982,367 | 1.27 | % |
Securities declined by $2,833, or
0.95%, from $297,417 at December 31, 2009 to $294,584 at June 30, 2010. Net
loans at June 30, 2010 were $575,372, down $7,649, or 1.31%, from $583,021 at
December 31, 2009. Deposits grew modestly, from $852,112 at year-end to $859,337
at June 30, 2010, an increase of $7,225, or 0.85%. Total assets were $982,367 at
December 31, 2009 and were $994,875 at June 30, 2010, an increase of $12,508, or
1.27%.
22
Asset
Quality
Key indicators of NBI’s asset quality
are presented in the following table:
June
30, 2010
|
June
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2009
|
|||||||||||
Nonperforming
loans
|
$ | 7,167 | $ | 2,729 | $ | 6,750 | |||||||
Loans
past due 90 days or more
|
389 | 1,746 | 1,697 | ||||||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
3,170 | 1,869 | 2,126 | ||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses to loans
|
1.30 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.17 | % | |||||||
Net
charge-off ratio
|
0.30 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.10 | % | |||||||
Ratio
of nonperforming assets to loans, net of unearned income and deferred
fees, plus other real estate owned
|
1.76 | % | 0.80 | % | 1.50 | % | |||||||
Ratio
of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
|
105.39 | % | 230.27 | % | 102.61 | % |
Total
nonperforming loans at June 30, 2010 were $7,167, which compares to $6,750 at
December 31, 2009 and $2,729 at June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2010, the
ratio of nonperforming loans to loans net of unearned income and deferred fees
was 1.23%.
The
increase in nonperforming loans was not unexpected, given the prolonged
recession and the slow recovery of the national and local economies. The higher
level of nonperforming loans impacted both the amount of the provision for loan
losses and the net charge-off ratio. Among other factors, the
total of nonperforming loans is considered in calculating the Company’s
allowance for loan losses, which in turn determines the amount needed in the
provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was $648, and it was $1,499 for the six months ended
June 30, 2010. This represents an increase of $851, or 131.33%, when the two
periods are compared. At June 30, 2010, the ratio of the
allowance for loan losses to loans was 1.30%, and it was 1.17% at December 31,
2009 and 1.09% at June 30, 2009. The net charge-off ratio was
0.30% at June 30, 2010, 0.10% at December 31, 2010 and 0.08% at June 30 2009.
Management anticipates that loan charge-offs will continue to increase in the
second half of 2010. However, because known nonperforming loans have
already been included in the calculation for the allowance for loan losses and
further additions to the provision for loan losses are expected to be the result
of the refinement of loss estimates, management does not believe that net income
will be dramatically affected by these losses.
Loans past due 90 days or more declined
to $389 at June 30, 2010, from $1,697 at December 31, 2009 and $1,746 at June
30, 2009. The decline is the result of loans being charged-off or
placed on nonaccrual status. Collateral that previously secured some
charged-off loans is now in other real estate owned because of foreclosure or
deeds in lieu of foreclosure. The total of other real estate owned
grew to $3,170 at June 30, 2010, from $2,126 at December 31, 2009 and $1,869 at
June 30, 2009. Because of the level of nonperforming loans, it is
likely that the total of other real estate owned will increase in the last six
months of 2010, as the real estate collateral associated with some of these
loans is acquired in foreclosure. It is not possible to accurately
predict the future total of other real estate owned, because property sold at
foreclosure may be acquired by third parties and NBB’s other real estate owned
properties are regularly marketed and sold.
Net Interest
Income
Net interest income for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 was $18,758, an increase of $2,155, or 12.98%, over the same
period last year. This resulted in an increase in the net interest
margin of 46 points, from 4.09% at June 30, 2009 to 4.55% at the same period in
2010. The increase in the net interest margin resulted from a decline
in the cost to fund earning assets of 75 basis points, offset by a decline in
the yield on earning assets of 19 basis points. The decline in the
cost to fund earning assets came primarily from a 110 basis point reduction in
the cost of time deposits and a 13 basis point reduction in the cost of
interest-bearing deposits, when the 6-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and June
30, 2009 are compared. The 19 basis point decline in the yield on
earning assets can be accounted for mostly by declines in both the yields on
loans and on taxable securities. The yield on loans declined 24 basis
points from June 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010, because of contractual repricing
terms and the renegotiation of loan interest rates in response to
competition. The yield on taxable securities was 21 basis points
lower for the six months ended June 30, 2010, when compared with the same period
in 2009. The market yield for securities of a comparable term has
declined over the past year, causing matured and called bonds to be replaced
with lower yield investments.
The Company’s yield on earning assets
and cost of funds are largely dependent on the interest rate
environment. In recent months, with interest rates at historic lows,
funding costs declined at a faster pace than the yield on earning
assets. The Company’s cost of funding is more sensitive to interest
rate changes than is the yield on earning assets.
23
Provision and Allowance for
Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses for the
six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $1,499, compared with $648 for the
first six months of 2009. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total
loans at the end of the first half of 2010 was 1.30%, which compares to 1.17% at
December 31, 2009. The net charge-off ratio was 0.30% at June 30, 2010 and 0.10%
at December 31, 2009. See “Asset Quality” for additional
information.
Noninterest
Income
Six
Months ended
|
|||||||||||||
June
30, 2010
|
June
30, 2009
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||||
Service
charges on deposits
|
$ | 1,486 | $ | 1,641 | (9.45 | ) | % | ||||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
151 | 156 | (3.21 | ) | % | ||||||||
Credit
card fees
|
1,426 | 1,337 | 6.66 | % | |||||||||
Trust
fees
|
530 | 537 | (1.30 | ) | % | ||||||||
BOLI
income
|
361 | 353 | 2.27 | % | |||||||||
Other
income
|
143 | 185 | (22.70 | ) | % | ||||||||
Realized
securities gains (losses)
|
(3 | ) | 70 | (104.29 | ) | % |
Service charges on deposit accounts
totaled $1,486 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This is a 9.45% decrease
of $155, when compared with the same period in 2009. The decline was in large
part the result of a decrease of $152 in fees from checking account overdrafts
and fees for checks returned for insufficient funds.
Other service charges and fees includes
charges for official checks, income from the sale of checks to customers, safe
deposit rent, fees for letters of credit and the income earned from commissions
on the sale of credit life, accident and health insurance. Income for 2010 and
2009 remained essentially unchanged.
Credit card fees for the first six
months of 2010 were $1,426. This was an increase of $89, or 6.66%, when compared
with the $1,337 total reported for the same period last year. The increase was
due to a higher volume of merchant transaction fees and credit card fees.
Management anticipates that this category of noninterest income may be
negatively affected by provisions included in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act. This recent legislation directs the Federal Reserve
Bank to control the level of merchant fees. It is not yet known how greatly the
legislation may impact the level of credit card fees or when that impact will
occur.
Trust fees, at $530, were down by $7,
or 1.30%, from the $537 earned in the first half of 2009. Trust income varies
depending on the number of Trust accounts, the types of accounts under
management and financial market conditions. The decline in Trust fees is
attributable primarily to the mix of account types held by the Trust
Department.
Noninterest income from bank-owned life
insurance (BOLI) increased $8, or 2.27%, to $361 for the six months ended June
30, 2010. The performance of the variable-rate insurance policies and change in
the number of participants accounted for the net increase.
Other income includes income that
cannot be classified in another category. Some examples include net gains from
the sales of fixed assets, rent from foreclosed properties and revenue from
investment and insurance sales. Other income for the six months ended June 30,
2010 was $143. This represents a decrease of $42, or 22.70%, when compared with
the six months ended June 30, 2009. This decrease came primarily from a decline
in investment commissions of $24 and insurance commissions of $7 in the
Company’s financial services affiliate. These areas fluctuate with market
conditions and because of competitive factors.
Realized securities losses for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 were $3, as compared with $70 in gains for the same
period in 2009. Realized securities losses in the first half of 2010 and
realized gains in the first half of 2009 are market driven and have come from
losses and gains on called securities.
24
Noninterest
Expense
Six
Months ended
|
|||||||||||||
June
30, 2010
|
June
30, 2009
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
$ | 5,510 | $ | 5,625 | (2.04 | ) | % | ||||||
Occupancy,
furniture and fixtures
|
968 | 894 | 8.28 | % | |||||||||
Data
processing and ATM
|
706 | 636 | 11.01 | % | |||||||||
FDIC
assessment
|
532 | 1,006 | (47.12 | ) | % | ||||||||
Credit
card processing
|
1,092 | 1,001 | 9.09 | % | |||||||||
Intangibles
amortization
|
542 | 551 | (1.63 | ) | % | ||||||||
Net
costs of other real estate owned
|
60 | 71 | (15.49 | ) | % | ||||||||
Franchise
taxes
|
481 | 445 | 8.09 | % | |||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
1,590 | 1,581 | 0.57 | % |
Salary and benefits expense decreased
$115, or 2.04%, from $5,625 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $5,510 for
the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decline is the result of the Company’s
efforts to control salary costs and an adjustment in the periodic accrual for
the Company’s salary continuation plan. This accrual may fluctuate because of
changes in the number of plan participants and the performance of bank owned
life insurance that is used to fund the plan. There was also an increase of $78
in net periodic pension expense associated with the Company’s defined benefit
pension plan. Net periodic expense varies because of changes in the number of
plan participants, the age of participants, the investment performance of the
plan trust and the interest rate environment.
Occupancy, furniture and fixtures
expense was $968 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $74, or
8.28%, from the same period last year.
Data processing and ATM expense was
$706 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $70, or 11.01%, from
the six months ended June 30, 2009. Higher data processing expense in the first
half of 2010 is associated with replacement of the Company’s host
computer.
When June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010
are compared, there was a significant decline in the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Deposit Insurance Fund Assessment. The total for the six months last
year was $1,006. This compares with $532 for the same period in 2010. During the
second quarter of 2009, all FDIC-insured banks, including NBB, were required to
pay a one-time special assessment of five basis points of total assets, less
Tier 1 Capital. There were no special assessments in the first half of 2010. By
December 31, 2009, all FDIC-insured banks prepaid the estimated regular
quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and all of 2010,
2011 and 2012. The 2010 FDIC assessment amount reflects two quarters of that
regular risk-based assessment. Given the severe impact of the economic downturn
on some of the nation’s banks, the Company has no assurance that the FDIC will
not impose future special assessments on insured banks to maintain the integrity
of the Deposit Insurance Fund.
Credit card processing expense was
$1,092 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $91, or 9.09%,
from the total for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This expense is driven by
volume and other factors such as merchant discount rates and is subject to a
degree of variability.
The expense for intangibles
amortization is related to acquisitions. There were no acquisitions in the past
year, and certain intangibles have been fully amortized. This accounts for the
1.63% decline, from $551 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $542 for the
six months ended June 30, 2010.
Net costs of other real estate owned
have decreased from $71 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $60 for the
six months ended June 30, 2010. This expense category varies with the number of
other real estate owned properties and the expenses associated with each.
Management anticipates that the total of other real estate owned and related
expenses will increase as the slow economy continues to impact
borrowers.
Bank franchise taxes have grown 8.09%,
from $445 at June 30, 2009 to $481 at the end of the first half of 2010. State
bank franchise taxes are based upon total equity, which has increased when
compared with June 30, 2009.
The category of other operating
expenses includes noninterest expense items such as professional services,
stationery and supplies, telephone costs, postage and charitable donations.
Other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $1,590, an
increase of $9, or 0.57%, when compared with the same period in 2009. Management
has made concerted efforts to control costs.
25
Balance
Sheet
Year-to-date daily averages for the
major balance sheet categories are as follows:
Assets
|
June
30, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
Percent
Change
|
||||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
$ | 43,167 | $ | 35,841 | 20.44 | % | |||||||
Securities
available for sale
|
162,730 | 166,592 | (2.32 | ) | % | ||||||||
Securities
held to maturity
|
126,765 | 131,645 | (3.71 | ) | % | ||||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
806 | 911 | (11.53 | ) | % | ||||||||
Real
estate construction loans
|
47,248 | 52,579 | (10.14 | ) | % | ||||||||
Real
estate mortgage loans
|
166,174 | 165,434 | 0.45 | % | |||||||||
Commercial
and industrial loans
|
282,552 | 261,172 | 8.19 | % | |||||||||
Loans
to individuals
|
92,763 | 100,581 | (7.77 | ) | % | ||||||||
Total
Assets
|
980,852 | 971,538 | 0.96 | % | |||||||||
Liabilities
and stockholders’ equity
|
|||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 120,123 | $ | 115,240 | 4.24 | % | |||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
312,061 | 282,532 | 10.45 | % | |||||||||
Savings
deposits
|
53,001 | 48,992 | 8.18 | % | |||||||||
Time
deposits
|
361,107 | 399,873 | (9.69 | ) | % | ||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
--- | 49 | (100.00 | ) | % | ||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
126,128 | 117,086 | 7.72 | % |
Securities
The total amortized cost of securities
available for sale and securities held to maturity at June 30, 2010 was
$290,482, and total fair value was $296,637. At June 30, 2010, the Company held
individual securities with a total fair value of $40,646 that had a total
unrealized loss of $1,235. Of this total, securities with a fair
value of $24,113 and an unrealized loss of $926 have been in a continuous loss
position for 12 months or more. At June 30, 2010, there were no
securities that management determined to be other-than-temporarily
impaired.
Management regularly monitors the
quality of the securities portfolio, and management closely follows the
uncertainty in the economy and the volatility of financial
markets. The value of individual securities will be written down if
the decline in fair value is considered to be other than temporary based upon
the totality of circumstances.
Loans
June
30, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||||
Commercial
and industrial loans
|
$ | 270,897 | $ | 283,998 | (4.61 | ) | % | ||||||
Real
estate construction loans
|
48,604 | 45,625 | 6.53 | % | |||||||||
Real
estate mortgage loans
|
173,724 | 165,542 | 4.94 | % | |||||||||
Loans
to individuals
|
90,702 | 95,844 | (5.36 | ) | % | ||||||||
Total
loans
|
$ | 583,927 | $ | 591,009 | (1.20 | ) | % |
The Company’s total gross loans
declined by $7,082 or 1.20%, from $591,009 at December 31, 2009 to $583,927 at
June 30, 2010. Commercial and industrial loans and loans to individuals
accounted for the majority of the decline, partially offset by increases in real
estate construction and real estate mortgage loans.
Commercial and industrial loans
declined 4.61% from $283,998 at December 31, 2009 to $270,897 at June 30, 2010.
The $13,101 decrease is due to lower loan demand in a slow economy.
The 5.36% decline in loans to
individuals continues a trend that has been evident over the past several years.
The availability of low cost dealer auto loans and other products, such as home
equity lines of credit, make traditional consumer installment loans less
attractive to customers. Loans to individuals totaled $90,702 at June 30, 2010.
This compares with $95,844 at year-end 2009.
Real estate construction loans grew
6.53% from $45,625 at December 31, 2009 to $48,604 at June 30, 2010. Real estate
mortgage loans grew 4.94% or $8,182 from $165,542 at December 31, 2009 to
$173,724 at June 30, 2010. Growth in these categories is seasonal and was
somewhat affected by a home-buyers’ tax credit in effect for most of the first
half of the year.
26
Overall
loan demand remained slow, as individual and business borrowers appear to be
hesitant to take on debt in an uncertain economic environment. Lower loan demand
may continue until there is sustained evidence of recovery in the Company’s
market area.
The Company does not now nor has it
ever, offered certain types of higher-risk loans such as subprime loans, option
ARM products or loans with initial teaser rates.
Deposits
June
30, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 125,694 | $ | 122,549 | 2.57 | % | |||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
324,038 | 310,629 | 4.32 | % | |||||||||
Saving
deposits
|
58,399 | 51,622 | 13.13 | % | |||||||||
Time
deposits
|
351,206 | 367,312 | (4.38 | ) | % | ||||||||
Total
deposits
|
$ | 859,337 | $ | 852,112 | 0.85 | % | |||||||
Total deposits have increased by
$7,225, or 0.85%, from $852,112 at December 31, 2009 to $859,337 at June 30,
2010. The growth was internally generated and was not the result of
acquisitions. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $3,145, or 2.57%,
from $122,549 at year-end to $125,694 at the end of the first half of 2010.
Interest-bearing demand deposits experienced a $13,409, or 4.32%, increase when
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 totals are compared. Savings deposits were
at $58,399 at the end of the first half of 2010, up by $6,777, or 13.13%, over
the $51,662 at year-end 2009. Time deposits declined by $16,106, or 4.38%, from
$367,312 at December 31, 2009 to $351,206 at June 30, 2010. As longer-term
certificates of deposit mature, customers are moving the funds to shorter-term
interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits because they are unwilling
to commit their funds in time deposits for extended periods at a low interest
rate.
Liquidity
Liquidity measures the Company’s
ability to provide sufficient cash flow to meet its financial commitments, such
as funding additional loan demand and handling withdrawals of existing
deposits. Sources of liquidity include deposits, repayments of loan
principal and interest, sales, calls and maturities of securities and short-term
borrowing. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and discount
window borrowing from the Federal Reserve Bank are additional sources of
liquidity.
The Company monitors factors that may
increase its liquidity needs. Some of these factors include deposit
trends, large depositor activity, maturing deposit promotions, the level of
unfunded loan commitments and loan growth. In addition, the Company
utilizes several other strategies to maintain sufficient
liquidity. Loan and deposit growth are managed to keep the loan to
deposit ratio within the Company’s own policy range of 65% to 75%. At
June 30, 2010, the loan to deposit ratio was 67.83%. The investment strategy
takes into consideration the term of the investment, and securities in the
available for sale portfolio are laddered based upon projected funding
needs. Finally, to assure that short-term borrowing is readily
available, the Company tests accessibility to its funding sources on an annual
basis.
Capital
Resources
Total stockholders’ equity at June 30,
2010 was $127,825, an increase of $5,749, or 4.71%, from the $122,076 at
December 31, 2009. The Tier I and Tier II risk-based capital ratios at June 30,
2010 were 17.35% and 18.49%, respectively. Capital levels remain significantly
above the regulatory minimum capital requirements of 4.0% for Tier I and 8.0%
for Tier II capital.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
In the normal course of business, NBB
extends lines of credit and letters of credit to its
customers. Depending on their needs, customers may at any time draw
upon lines of credit, in any amount up to a pre-approved
limit. Standby letters of credit are issued for two
purposes. Financial letters of credit guarantee payments to
facilitate customer purchases. Performance letters of credit
guarantee payment if the customer fails to complete a specific
obligation.
Historically, the full approved amount
of letters and lines of credit has not been drawn at any one
time. The Company has developed plans to meet a sudden and
substantial funding demand. These plans include accessing a line of
credit with a correspondent bank, borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank,
selling available for sale investments or loans and raising additional
deposits.
27
NBB also has
recourse agreements with purchasers of residential mortgage loans that are
originated by NBB and sold on the secondary market. Loan purchasers
may rely upon recourse provisions for a variety of reasons, including early
customer default, for a defined period of time after acquiring a mortgage
loan. The Company has determined that its risk in this area is not
significant because of a low volume of secondary market mortgage loans and high
underwriting standards. If funds were needed, the Company would
access the same sources as noted above for funding lines and letters of
credit.
There were no material changes in
off-balance sheet arrangements during the six months ended June 30, 2010, except
for normal seasonal fluctuations in the total of mortgage loan
commitments.
Contractual
Obligations
The Company had no capital lease or
purchase obligations and no long-term debt at June 30, 2010. Operating lease
obligations, which are for buildings used in the Company’s day-to-day
operations, were not material at the end of the first half of 2010 and have not
changed materially from those which were disclosed in the Company’s 2009 Form
10-K.
The Company considers interest rate
risk to be a significant market risk and has systems in place to measure the
exposure of net interest income to adverse movement in interest rates. Interest
rate shock analyses provide management with an indication of potential economic
loss due to future rate changes. There have not been any changes which would
significantly alter the results disclosed as of December 31, 2009 in the
Company’s 2009 Form 10-K.
The Company’s management evaluated,
with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2010 to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files
or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the
Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Because of the inherent limitations in
all control systems, the Company believes that no system of controls, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance that all control
issues have been detected.
Other
Information
There are
no pending or threatened legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or to which the property of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries is subject that, in the opinion of management, may materially
impact the financial condition of the Company.
Please refer to the “Risk Factors”
previously disclosed in Item 1A of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the
factors discussed under “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements” in Part I. Item 2 of this Form 10-Q.
The Company did not repurchase stock
during the first half of 2010.
28
There were none for the six months
ended June 30, 2010.
Subsequent
Events
From June 30, 2010, the balance sheet
date of this Form 10-Q, through the date of filing the Form 10-Q with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, there have been no material subsequent
events that 1) provide additional evidence about conditions that existed on the
date of the balance sheet, or 2) provide evidence about conditions that did not
exist at the date of the balance sheet, but arose after the balance sheet
date.
See Index of Exhibits.
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
NATIONAL BANKSHARES,
INC.
DATE
August 6, 2010
|
/s/ JAMES G. RAKES
|
James
G. Rakes
President
and
Chief
Executive Officer
(Authorized
Officer)
|
|
DATE:
August 6, 2010
|
/s/ DAVID K. SKEENS
|
David
K. Skeens
Treasurer
and
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
29
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
Page
No. in
Sequential
System
|
3(i)
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation of National Bankshares,
Inc.
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 8K for filed on March 16,
2006)
|
3(ii)
|
Amended
By-laws of National Bankshares, Inc.
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Annual Report on Form 10K for
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)
|
4(i)
|
Specimen
copy of certificate for National Bankshares, Inc. common
stock
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4(a) of the Annual Report on Form 10K for
fiscal year ended December 31, 1993)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
National
Bankshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Form S-8, filed as Registration
No. 333-79979 with the Commission on June 4, 1999)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Executive
Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2008, between National Bankshares,
Inc. and James G. Rakes
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Employee
Lease Agreement dated August 14, 2002, between National Bankshares, Inc.
and The National Bank of Blacksburg
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10 (iii) (A) of Form 10Q for the period
ended September 30, 2002)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Executive
Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2008, between National Bankshares,
Inc. and F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Executive
Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2008, between National Bankshares,
Inc. and Marilyn B. Buhyoff
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement dated February 8, 2006, between The National Bank
of Blacksburg and James G. Rakes
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on February
8, 2006)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement dated February 8, 2006, between The National Bank
of Blacksburg and F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on February
8, 2006)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement dated February 8, 2006, between
National
Bankshares, Inc. and Marilyn B. Buhyoff
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on February
8, 2006)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
First
Amendment, dated December 19, 2007, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for James G. Rakes
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on December
19, 2007)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
First
Amendment, dated December 19, 2007, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on December
19, 2007)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
First
Amendment, dated December 19, 2007, to National Bankshares, Inc. Salary
Continuation Agreement for Marilyn B. Buhyoff
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on December
19, 2007)
|
*10(viii)(A)
|
Second
Amendment, dated June 12, 2008, to The National Bank of Blacksburg Salary
Continuation Agreement for F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on June 12,
2008)
|
30
*10(viii)(A)
|
Second
Amendment, dated December 17, 2008, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for James G. Rakes
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(viii)(A)
|
Second
Amendment, dated December 17, 2008, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for Marilyn B. Buhyoff
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(viii)(A)
|
Third
Amendment, dated December 17, 2008, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
31(i)
|
Section
906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
(included
herewith)
|
31(ii)
|
Section
906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
(included
herewith)
|
32(i)
|
18
U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
(included
herewith)
|
32(ii)
|
18
U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
(included
herewith)
|
* Indicates
a management contract or compensatory plan.
31
Exhibit
31(i)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, James G. Rakes, certify
that:
1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Bankshares,
Inc.;
2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
August 6, 2010
/s/ JAMES G. RAKES
|
James
G. Rakes
President
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
32
Exhibit
31(ii)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, David K. Skeens, certify
that:
1.
|
I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Bankshares,
Inc.;
|
2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
August 6, 2010
/s/ DAVID K. SKEENS
|
David
K. Skeens
Treasurer
and
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
33
Exhibit
32 (i)
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the Form 10-Q of
National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, I, James G.
Rakes, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of
National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:
(1) such Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
(2) the
information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.
/s/ JAMES G. RAKES
|
James
G. Rakes
President
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
August
6, 2010
|
Exhibit
32 (ii)
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the Form 10-Q of
National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, I, David K.
Skeens, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of
National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:
(1) such Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
(2) the
information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.
/s/ DAVID K. SKEENS
|
David
K. Skeens
Treasurer
and
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
August
6, 2010
|
34