NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-31465
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
35-2164875 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
601 Jefferson Street, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(713) 751-7507
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or
a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and
smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
þ Large Accelerated Filer | o Accelerated Filer | o Non-accelerated Filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
o Smaller Reporting Company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At November 5, 2010 there were 106,027,836 Common Units outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements included in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our
representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements that are also
forward-looking statements.
Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding capital
expenditures, acquisitions and dispositions, expected commencement dates of mining, projected
quantities of future production by our lessees and projected demand for or supply of coal and
aggregates that will affect sales levels, prices and royalties and other revenues realized by us.
These forward-looking statements are made based upon managements current plans, expectations,
estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a
number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees
and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements.
You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Please read Item 1A.
Risk Factors in our Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 for important factors that
could cause our actual results of operations or our actual financial condition to differ.
3
Table of Contents
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 72,240 | $ | 82,634 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
28,974 | 27,141 | ||||||
Accounts receivable affiliates |
7,850 | 4,342 | ||||||
Other |
197 | 930 | ||||||
Total current assets |
109,261 | 115,047 | ||||||
Land |
24,343 | 24,343 | ||||||
Plant and equipment, net |
63,701 | 64,351 | ||||||
Coal and other mineral rights, net |
1,241,714 | 1,151,835 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
160,751 | 164,554 | ||||||
Loan financing costs, net |
2,550 | 2,891 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
682 | 569 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,603,002 | $ | 1,523,590 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 2,486 | $ | 914 | ||||
Accounts payable affiliates |
178 | 179 | ||||||
Obligation related to acquisitions |
| 2,969 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
31,518 | 32,235 | ||||||
Accrued incentive plan expenses current portion |
5,734 | 4,627 | ||||||
Property, franchise and other taxes payable |
5,603 | 6,164 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
2,842 | 10,300 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
48,361 | 57,388 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
96,272 | 67,018 | ||||||
Accrued incentive plan expenses |
8,689 | 7,371 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
606,070 | 626,587 | ||||||
Partners capital: |
||||||||
Common units outstanding: (106,027,836 in 2010, 69,451,136 in 2009) |
822,365 | 747,437 | ||||||
General partners interest |
14,450 | 13,409 | ||||||
Holders of incentive distribution rights |
| 4,977 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest |
7,355 | | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(560 | ) | (597 | ) | ||||
Total partners capital |
843,610 | 765,226 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners capital |
$ | 1,603,002 | $ | 1,523,590 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per unit data)
(In thousands, except per unit data)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Coal royalties |
$ | 60,142 | $ | 49,307 | $ | 165,135 | $ | 148,294 | ||||||||
Aggregate royalties |
1,606 | 1,700 | 2,847 | 4,697 | ||||||||||||
Coal processing fees |
2,343 | 1,508 | 6,680 | 5,808 | ||||||||||||
Transportation fees |
4,285 | 3,049 | 11,103 | 8,634 | ||||||||||||
Oil and gas royalties |
1,013 | 1,203 | 4,200 | 3,649 | ||||||||||||
Property taxes |
3,552 | 3,311 | 8,985 | 9,036 | ||||||||||||
Minimums recognized as revenue |
3,782 | 775 | 10,574 | 1,065 | ||||||||||||
Override royalties |
2,625 | 2,077 | 8,749 | 5,961 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,404 | 1,032 | 5,586 | 3,038 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
80,752 | 63,962 | 223,859 | 190,182 | ||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
16,195 | 12,952 | 44,048 | 48,026 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
8,761 | 4,586 | 22,103 | 17,926 | ||||||||||||
Property, franchise and other taxes |
4,580 | 4,273 | 11,812 | 11,399 | ||||||||||||
Transportation costs |
614 | 403 | 1,436 | 1,144 | ||||||||||||
Coal royalty and override payments |
258 | 353 | 1,251 | 1,214 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
30,408 | 22,567 | 80,650 | 79,709 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
50,344 | 41,395 | 143,209 | 110,473 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(10,204 | ) | (10,762 | ) | (31,279 | ) | (29,516 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
13 | 18 | 25 | 196 | ||||||||||||
Income before non-controlling interest |
40,153 | 30,651 | 111,955 | 81,153 | ||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 40,153 | $ | 30,651 | $ | 111,955 | $ | 81,153 | ||||||||
Net income attributable to: |
||||||||||||||||
General partner |
$ | 803 | $ | 513 | $ | 1,720 | $ | 1,052 | ||||||||
Holders of incentive distribution rights |
$ | | $ | 4,977 | $ | 25,966 | $ | 28,538 | ||||||||
Limited partners |
$ | 39,350 | $ | 25,161 | $ | 84,269 | $ | 51,563 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit |
$ | 0.51 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of units outstanding |
77,896 | 69,451 | 73,792 | 67,113 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 111,955 | $ | 81,153 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
44,048 | 48,026 | ||||||
Non-cash interest charge, net |
415 | 1,336 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(5,341 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
620 | 579 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
303 | (143 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest |
(7,458 | ) | (3,214 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
29,254 | 10,306 | ||||||
Accrued incentive plan expenses |
2,425 | 2,408 | ||||||
Property, franchise and other taxes payable |
(561 | ) | (1,632 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
175,660 | 138,799 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of land, coal and other mineral rights |
(111,176 | ) | (114,986 | ) | ||||
Acquisition or construction of plant and equipment |
(4,320 | ) | (1,157 | ) | ||||
Disposition of assets |
808 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(114,688 | ) | (116,143 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from loans |
85,000 | 325,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of units |
110,436 | | ||||||
Capital contribution by general partner |
2,350 | | ||||||
Deferred financing costs |
| (661 | ) | |||||
Repayment of loans |
(106,234 | ) | (168,235 | ) | ||||
Retirement of obligation related to acquisitions |
(9,169 | ) | (63,000 | ) | ||||
Costs associated with issuance of units |
(152 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Fees associated with the elimination of the IDRs |
(2,170 | ) | | |||||
Distributions to partners |
(151,427 | ) | (144,787 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(71,366 | ) | (51,704 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(10,394 | ) | (29,048 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
82,634 | 89,928 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 72,240 | $ | 60,880 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 38,292 | $ | 31,316 | ||||
Non-cash investing activities: |
||||||||
Mineral rights to be received |
$ | 13,249 | $ | | ||||
Liability associated with an acquisition |
1,268 | 1,170 | ||||||
Equity issued for acquisitions |
| 95,910 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest |
(7,355 | ) | | |||||
Non-cash financing activities: |
||||||||
Obligation related to purchase of reserves and infrastructure |
6,200 | 74,022 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation and Organization
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for future periods.
You should refer to the information contained in the footnotes included in Natural Resource
Partners L.P.s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A in connection with the reading of these unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements.
The Partnership engages principally in the business of owning, managing and leasing mineral
properties in the United States. The Partnership owns coal reserves in the three major
coal-producing regions of the United States: Appalachia, the Illinois Basin and the Western United
States, as well as lignite reserves in the Gulf Coast region. The Partnership also owns aggregate
reserves in several states across the country. The Partnership does not operate any mines on its
properties. The Partnership leases reserves through its subsidiaries to experienced operators under
long-term leases that grant the operators the right to mine the Partnerships reserves in exchange
for royalty payments. The Partnerships lessees are generally required to make payments to the
Partnership based on the higher of a percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed royalty per
ton. In most cases, the lessees are required to make minimum payments to the Partnership.
In addition, the Partnership owns transportation and preparation equipment, other coal related
rights and oil and gas properties on which it earns revenue.
The general partner of the Partnership is NRP (GP) LP, a Delaware limited partnership, whose
general partner is GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
2. Significant Accounting Policies Update
Intangible Assets
As of April 1, 2010, the Partnership adjusted the amortization of intangible assets to be
based upon the greater of straight-line over the remaining estimated useful life or the
unit-of-production. The Partnership determined that this refinement of the existing accounting
policy more accurately reflects the future benefits of the assets. For the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, the refinement resulted in an increase in amortization expense of $2.9
million and $5.9 million, or approximately $0.04 and $0.08 per unit, respectively. Although the
Partnership anticipates this refinement to increase amortization expense in future periods, the
amount of the increase will vary based upon actual production.
Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years financial statements. Immaterial
amounts relating to two acquisitions have been reclassified between various assets based upon more
information.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB amended fair value disclosure requirements. This amendment requires
a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level
1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. See Note 8.
Fair Value Measurements for the definition of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements. The amendment
also requires a reporting entity to present separately information about purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Partnership applied the effective
provisions of this amendment in preparing its disclosures, however the adoption of the standard did
not have a material effect on such disclosures.
7
Table of Contents
On January 1, 2009, the Partnership adopted new standards for the accounting and reporting of
non-controlling interests in a subsidiary. As discussed in Note 3, in connection with the business
combination completed in June 2010, the Partnership acquired a controlling interest in a newly
formed venture. All assets and liabilities of the venture are included in the consolidated
balance sheet and the non-controlling interest in the venture is reflected as a component of
equity; the revenues and expenses of the venture are reflected in consolidated results of
operations with separate disclosure of the earnings or losses allocable to the non-controlling
interest.
In February 2010, the FASB amended the subsequent events standard, removing the requirement
for an SEC filer to disclose the date it issued and revised financial statements. The FASB added
that revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either
correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The Partnership adopted this
amendment for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on the
Partnerships disclosures.
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other
standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Partnerships financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
3. Recent Acquisitions
International Paper. In June 2010, the Partnership and International Paper Company (IPC)
created a venture, BRP LLC, to own and manage mineral assets previously owned by IPC. Some of
these assets are currently subject to leases, and certain other assets have not yet been developed
but are available for future development by the venture. In exchange for a $42.5 million
contribution, NRP became the controlling member with the right to designate two of the three
managers of BRP. NRP has a 51% income interest plus a preferential cumulative annual distribution
prior to profit sharing. In exchange for the contribution of the producing properties and the
properties not currently producing, IPC received $42.5 million in cash, a minority voting interest
and a 49% income interest after the preferential cumulative annual distribution. The amount of the
preference is fixed throughout the life of the venture but can be reduced by a portion of the
proceeds received from sales of producing properties included in the initial acquisition.
Identified tangible assets included in the transaction are oil and gas, coal, and aggregate
reserves, as well the rights to coal bed methane, geothermal, CO2 sequestration, water
rights, precious metals, industrial minerals and base metals. Certain properties, including oil
and gas, coal and aggregates, as well as land leased for cell towers, are currently under lease and
generating revenues.
The transaction was accounted for as a business combination and, at September 30, 2010, the
assets and liabilities of the venture are included in the consolidated balance sheet. Operations
of the venture are included from June 1, 2010, the effective date of acquisition. The venture
operating agreement provides that net income of the venture only be allocated to the
non-controlling interests after the preferential cumulative annual distribution. As earnings for
the period ended September 30, 2010 were less than the preference amount, no earnings are allocated
to the non-controlling interest. The identification of all tangible and intangible assets
acquired as well as the valuation process required for the allocation of the purchase price to
those assets is not complete. Pending the final allocation of individual assets, all acquired
assets of approximately $49.9 million are included in coal and other mineral rights in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
As the venture was formed for purposes of this transaction, there are no prior period
operating results. Transaction expenses related to the acquisition were $2.2 million as of
September 30, 2010 and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Income.
Rockmart Slate. In June 2010, the Partnership acquired approximately 100 acres of mineral and
surface rights related to slate reserves in Rockmart, Georgia from a local operator for a purchase
price of $6.7 million.
Sierra Silica. In April 2010, the Partnership acquired the rights to silica reserves on
approximately 1,000 acres of property in Northern California for $17.0 million.
North American Limestone. In April 2010, the Partnership signed an agreement to build and own
a fine grind processing facility for high calcium carbonate limestone located in Putnam County,
Indiana. The Partnership will lease the facility to a local operator. The total cost for the
facility is not to exceed $6.5 million. As of September 30, 2010 the Partnership had incurred
approximately $5.6 million of costs associated with the construction of the facility.
Northgate-Thayer. In March 2010, the Partnership acquired approximately 100 acres of mineral
and surface rights related to dolomite limestone reserves in White County, Indiana from a local
operator for a purchase price of $7.5 million.
8
Table of Contents
Massey-Override. In March 2010, the Partnership acquired from Massey Energy subsidiaries
overriding royalty interests in coal reserves located in southern West Virginia and eastern
Kentucky. Total consideration for this purchase was $3.0 million.
AzConAgg. In December 2009, the Partnership acquired approximately 230 acres of mineral and
surface rights related to sand and gravel reserves in southern Arizona from a local operator for
$3.75 million.
Colt. In September 2009, the Partnership signed a definitive agreement to acquire
approximately 200 million tons of coal reserves related to the Deer Run Mine in Illinois from Colt,
LLC, an affiliate of the Cline Group, through several separate transactions for a total purchase
price of $255 million. As of September 30, 2010, the Partnership had acquired approximately 22.8
million tons of reserves associated with the initial production from the mine for approximately $50
million. Future closings anticipated through 2012 will be associated with completion of certain
milestones related to the new mine.
Blue Star. In July 2009, the Partnership acquired approximately 121 acres of limestone
reserves in Wise County, Texas from Blue Star Materials, LLC for a purchase price of $24 million.
Gatling Ohio. In May 2009, the Partnership completed the purchase of the membership interests
in two companies from Adena Minerals, LLC, an affiliate of the Cline Group. The companies own 51.5
million tons of coal reserves and infrastructure assets at Clines Yellowbush Mine located on the
Ohio River in Meigs County, Ohio. The Partnership issued 4,560,000 common units to Adena Minerals
in connection with this acquisition. In addition, the general partner of Natural Resource Partners
granted Adena Minerals an additional nine percent interest in the general partner.
Massey- Jewell Smokeless. In March 2009, the Partnership acquired from Lauren Land Company, a
subsidiary of Massey Energy, the remaining four-fifths interest in coal reserves located in
Buchanan County, Virginia in which the Partnership previously held a one-fifth interest. Total
consideration for this purchase was $12.5 million.
Macoupin. In January 2009, the Partnership acquired approximately 82 million tons of coal
reserves and infrastructure assets related to the Shay No. 1 mine in Macoupin County, Illinois for
$143.7 million from Macoupin Energy, LLC, an affiliate of the Cline Group.
4. Plant and Equipment
The Partnerships plant and equipment consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Plant construction in-process |
$ | 5,588 | $ | | ||||
Plant and equipment at cost |
81,866 | 81,866 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(23,753 | ) | (17,515 | ) | ||||
Net book value |
$ | 63,701 | $ | 64,351 | ||||
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Total depreciation expense on plant and equipment |
$ | 6,238 | $ | 6,128 | ||||
9
Table of Contents
5. Coal and Other Mineral Rights
The Partnerships coal and other mineral rights consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Coal and other mineral rights |
$ | 1,579,148 | $ | 1,460,984 | ||||
Less accumulated depletion and amortization |
(337,434 | ) | (309,149 | ) | ||||
Net book value |
$ | 1,241,714 | $ | 1,151,835 | ||||
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Total depletion and amortization expense on coal and other mineral rights |
$ | 28,285 | $ | 39,521 | ||||
Coal and other mineral rights includes $13.2 million for additional mineral rights being
contributed by International Paper Company resulting from the formation of a venture with the
Partnership during the second quarter of 2010. These mineral rights are being contributed to the
Partnership over the remainder of 2010 at no additional cost to the Partnership.
Depletion expense for 2009 included a one-time expense of $8.2 million for a terminated lease
due to a mine closure.
6. Intangible Assets
In 2010, the Partnership identified $5.7 million of an above market contract relating to the
Sierra Silica acquisition. In 2009, the Partnership identified $65.1 million of above market
contracts, primarily relating to the Gatling Ohio and Macoupin acquisitions. Amounts recorded as
intangible assets along with the balances and accumulated amortization at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 are reflected in the table below:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Above market contracts |
$ | 178,427 | $ | 172,706 | ||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(17,676 | ) | (8,152 | ) | ||||
Net book value |
$ | 160,751 | $ | 164,554 | ||||
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Total amortization expense on intangible assets |
$ | 9,524 | $ | 2,376 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
As of April 1, 2010, the Partnership adjusted the amortization expense to be based upon the
greater of the production and sales of reserves and the number of tons of coal transported using
the transportation infrastructure or straight line over the remaining useful life. The estimates of
future expense for the periods indicated below reflect this adjustment and are based on current
mining plans, which are subject to revision in future periods.
Estimated amortization expense:
(In thousands) | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
Remainder of 2010 |
$ | 3,839 | ||
For year ended December 31, 2011 |
15,945 | |||
For year ended December 31, 2012 |
15,945 | |||
For year ended December 31, 2013 |
15,945 | |||
For year ended December 31, 2014 |
15,945 |
7. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
$300 million floating rate revolving credit facility, due March 2012 |
$ | 39,000 | $ | 28,000 | ||||
5.55% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and
December, maturing June 2013 |
35,000 | 35,000 | ||||||
4.91% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and
December, with annual principal payments in June, maturing in June 2018 |
37,650 | 43,700 | ||||||
8.38% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in March and
September, with scheduled principal payments beginning March 2013,
maturing in March 2019 |
150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
5.05% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in January and
July, with annual principal payments in July, maturing in July 2020 |
76,923 | 84,615 | ||||||
5.31% utility local improvement obligation, with annual principal and
interest payments, maturing in March 2021 |
2,115 | 2,307 | ||||||
5.55% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and
December, with annual principal payments in June, maturing in June 2023 |
36,900 | 40,200 | ||||||
5.82% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in March and
September, with annual principal payments in March, maturing in March
2024 |
210,000 | 225,000 | ||||||
8.92% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in March and
September, with scheduled principal payments beginning March 2014,
maturing in March 2024 |
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
Total debt |
637,588 | 658,822 | ||||||
Less current portion of long term debt |
(31,518 | ) | (32,235 | ) | ||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 606,070 | $ | 626,587 | ||||
Principal payments due in:
Senior Notes | Credit Facility | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Remainder of 2010 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
2011 |
31,518 | | 31,518 | |||||||||
2012 |
30,801 | 39,000 | 69,801 | |||||||||
2013 |
87,230 | | 87,230 | |||||||||
2014 |
56,175 | | 56,175 | |||||||||
Thereafter |
392,864 | | 392,864 | |||||||||
$ | 598,588 | $ | 39,000 | $ | 637,588 | |||||||
11
Table of Contents
The senior note purchase agreement contains covenants requiring our operating subsidiary to:
| Maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the note purchase agreement) of no more than 4.0 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters; | ||
| not permit debt secured by certain liens and debt of subsidiaries to exceed 10% of consolidated net tangible assets (as defined in the note purchase agreement); and | ||
| maintain the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated operating lease expense) at not less than 3.5 to 1.0. |
The 8.38% and 8.92% senior notes also provide that in the event that the Partnerships
leverage ratio exceeds 3.75 to 1.00 at the end of any fiscal quarter, then in addition to all other
interest accruing on these notes, additional interest in the amount of 2.00% per annum shall accrue
on the notes for the two succeeding quarters and for as long thereafter as the leverage ratio
remains above 3.75 to 1.00.
The Partnership made principal payments of $32.2 million on its senior notes during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
The Partnership has a $300 million revolving credit facility, and at September 30, 2010, $261
million was available under the facility. The Partnership incurs a commitment fee on the undrawn
portion of the revolving credit facility at rates ranging from 0.10% to 0.30% per annum. Under an
accordion feature in the credit facility, the Partnership may request its lenders to increase their
aggregate commitment to a maximum of $450 million on the same terms. However, the Partnership
cannot be certain that its lenders will elect to participate in the accordion feature. To the
extent the lenders decline to participate, the Partnership may elect to bring new lenders into the
facility, but cannot make any assurance that the additional credit capacity will be available on
existing or comparable terms.
The Partnership had $39.0 million and $28.0 million outstanding on its revolving credit
facility at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The weighted average interest
rate at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was 1.41% and 2.07%, respectively.
The revolving credit facility contains covenants requiring the Partnership to maintain:
| a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of 3.75 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters; provided however, if during one of those quarters we have made an acquisition, then the ratio shall not exceed 4.0 to 1.0 for the quarter in which the acquisition occurred and (1) if the acquisition is in the first half of the quarter, the next two quarters or (2) if the acquisition is in the second half of the quarter, the next three quarters; and | ||
| a ratio of consolidated EBITDDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated lease operating expense) of 4.0 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters. |
The Partnership was in compliance with all terms under its long-term debt as of September 30, 2010.
8. Fair Value Measurements
The Partnership discloses certain assets and liabilities using fair value as defined by FASBs
fair value authoritative guidance.
FASBs guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
| Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||
| Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
12
Table of Contents
| Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. |
The Partnerships financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amount of the Partnerships financial
instruments included in accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their fair value due
to their short-term nature. The Partnerships cash and cash equivalents include money market
accounts and are considered a Level 1 measurement. The fair market value of the Partnerships
long-term debt was estimated to be $606.7 million and $627.5 million at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, for the senior notes. The carrying value of the Partnerships
senior notes was $598.6 million and $630.8 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. The fair value is estimated by management using comparable term risk-free treasury
issues with a market rate component determined by current financial instruments with similar
characteristics which is a Level 3 measurement. Since the Partnerships credit facility is variable
rate debt, its fair value approximates its carrying amount.
9. Related Party Transactions
Reimbursements to Affiliates of our General Partner
The Partnerships general partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation
for its management of Natural Resource Partners L.P. However, in accordance with the partnership
agreement, the general partner and its affiliates are reimbursed for expenses incurred on the
Partnerships behalf. All direct general and administrative expenses are charged to the
Partnership as incurred. The Partnership also reimburses indirect general and administrative
costs, including certain legal, accounting, treasury, information technology, insurance,
administration of employee benefits and other corporate services incurred by our general partner
and its affiliates.
The reimbursements to affiliates of the Partnerships general partner for services performed
by Western Pocahontas Properties and Quintana Minerals Corporation are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Reimbursement for services |
$ | 1,823 | $ | 1,678 | $ | 5,403 | $ | 5,107 | ||||||||
The Partnership leases substantially all of two floors of an office building in Huntington,
West Virginia from Western Pocahontas Properties and pays $0.5 million in lease payments each year
through December 31, 2018.
Transactions with Cline Affiliates
Various companies controlled by Chris Cline lease coal reserves from the Partnership, and the
Partnership provides coal transportation services to them for a fee. Mr. Cline, both individually
and through another affiliate, Adena Minerals, LLC, owns a 31% interest in the Partnerships
general partner, as well as 21,017,441 common units. At September 30, 2010, the Partnership had
accounts receivable totaling $7.3 million from Cline affiliates. Revenues from the Cline
affiliates are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
$ | 9,873 | $ | 5,499 | $ | 22,655 | $ | 16,049 | ||||||||
Coal processing fees |
344 | | 785 | | ||||||||||||
Transportation fees |
4,271 | 2,758 | 10,671 | 7,991 | ||||||||||||
Minimums recognized as revenue |
3,100 | | 9,300 | | ||||||||||||
Override revenue |
718 | 834 | 1,437 | 1,604 | ||||||||||||
$ | 18,306 | $ | 9,091 | $ | 44,848 | $ | 25,644 | |||||||||
13
Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2010, the Partnership had received $42.0 million in minimum royalty
payments that have not been recouped by Cline affiliates, of which $17.8 million was received in
the current year.
Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd.
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. is a principal in Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd., which controls
several private equity funds focused on investments in the energy business. In connection with the
formation of Quintana Capital, the Partnership adopted a formal conflicts policy that establishes
the opportunities that will be pursued by the Partnership and those that will be pursued by
Quintana Capital. The governance documents of Quintana Capitals affiliated investment funds
reflect the guidelines set forth in NRPs conflicts policy.
A fund controlled by Quintana Capital owns a significant membership interest in Taggart Global
USA, LLC, including the right to nominate two members of Taggarts 5-person board of directors.
The Partnership currently has a memorandum of understanding with Taggart Global pursuant to which
the two companies have agreed to jointly pursue the development of coal handling and preparation
plants. The Partnership owns and leases the plants to Taggart Global, which designs, builds and
operates the plants. The lease payments are based on the sales price for the coal that is
processed through the facilities. To date, the Partnership has acquired four facilities under this
agreement with Taggart with a total cost of $46.6 million. Revenues from Taggart are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal processing revenue |
$ | 1,666 | $ | 1,017 | $ | 4,014 | $ | 2,910 | ||||||||
At September 30, 2010, the Partnership had accounts receivable totaling $0.4 million from
Taggart.
A fund controlled by Quintana Capital owns Kopper-Glo, a small coal mining company that is one
of the Partnerships lessees with operations in Tennessee. Revenues from Kopper-Glo are as
follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
$ | 363 | $ | 392 | $ | 1,195 | $ | 1,223 | ||||||||
The Partnership also had accounts receivable totaling $0.1 million from Kopper-Glo at
September 30, 2010.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
The Partnership is involved, from time to time, in various legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. While the ultimate results of these proceedings cannot be predicted
with certainty, Partnership management believes these claims will not have a material effect on the
Partnerships financial position, liquidity or operations.
Environmental Compliance
The operations conducted on the Partnerships properties by its lessees are subject to
environmental laws and regulations adopted by various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions
in which these operations are conducted. As owner of surface interests in some properties, the
Partnership may be liable for certain environmental conditions occurring at the surface properties.
The terms of substantially all of the Partnerships leases require the lessee to comply with all
applicable laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. Lessees post
reclamation bonds assuring that reclamation will be completed as required by the relevant permit,
and substantially all of the leases require the lessee to indemnify the Partnership against, among
other things, environmental liabilities. Some of these indemnifications survive the termination of
the lease. The Partnership has neither incurred, nor is aware of, any material environmental
charges imposed on it related to its properties as of September 30, 2010. The Partnership is not
associated with any environmental contamination that may require remediation costs.
14
Table of Contents
Acquisition
In conjunction with a definitive agreement, as of September 30, 2010, the Partnership may be
obligated to purchase in excess of 171 million additional tons of coal reserves from Colt, LLC for
an aggregate purchase price of $205.0 million over the next two years as certain milestones are
completed relating to construction of a new mine. See Footnote 14 Subsequent Events, for further
information regarding an additional acquisition of reserves after September 30, 2010.
11. Major Lessee
Revenues from lessees that exceeded ten percent of total revenues for the periods as presented
below:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | Percent | Revenues | Percent | Revenues | Percent | Revenues | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Cline Group |
$ | 18,306 | 23 | % | $ | 9,091 | 14 | % | $ | 44,848 | 20 | % | $ | 25,644 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Alpha Natural Resources |
$ | 7,256 | 9 | % | $ | 6,184 | 10 | % | $ | 20,859 | 9 | % | $ | 18,329 | 10 | % |
12. Incentive Plans
GP Natural Resource Partners LLC adopted the Natural Resource Partners Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the Long-Term Incentive Plan) for directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC and
employees of its affiliates who perform services for the Partnership. The Compensation, Nominating
and Governance (CNG) Committee of GP Natural Resource Partners LLCs board of directors
administers the Long-Term Incentive Plan. Subject to the rules of the exchange upon which the
common units are listed at the time, the board of directors and the compensation committee of the
board of directors have the right to alter or amend the Long-Term Incentive Plan or any part of the
Long-Term Incentive Plan from time to time. Except upon the occurrence of unusual or nonrecurring
events, no change in any outstanding grant may be made that would materially reduce the benefit
intended to be made available to a participant without the consent of the participant.
Under the plan a grantee will receive the market value of a common unit in cash upon vesting.
Market value is defined as the average closing price over the last 20 trading days prior to the
vesting date. The CNG Committee may make grants under the Long-Term Incentive Plan to employees and
directors containing such terms as it determines, including the vesting period. Outstanding grants
vest upon a change in control of the Partnership, the general partner, or GP Natural Resource
Partners LLC. If a grantees employment or membership on the board of directors terminates for any
reason, outstanding grants will be automatically forfeited unless and to the extent the CNG
Committee provides otherwise.
A summary of activity in the outstanding grants for the first nine months of 2010 are as
follows:
Outstanding grants at January 1, 2010 |
653,598 | |||
Grants during the year |
236,548 | |||
Grants vested and paid during the year |
(133,782 | ) | ||
Forfeitures during the year |
(2,496 | ) | ||
Outstanding grants at September 30, 2010 |
753,868 | |||
Grants typically vest at the end of a four-year period and are paid in cash upon vesting. The
liability fluctuates with the market value of the Partnership units and because of changes in
estimated fair value determined each quarter using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Risk
free interest rates and volatility are reset at each calculation based on current rates
corresponding to the remaining vesting term for each outstanding grant and ranged from 0.19% to
0.68% and 29.96% to 53.76%, respectively at September 30, 2010. The Partnerships historical
distribution rate of 6.74% and historical forfeiture rate of 3.38% were used in the calculation at
September 30, 2010. The Partnership recorded expenses related to its plan to be reimbursed to its
general partner of $3.1 million and $0.3 million and $5.4 million and $4.8 million for the three
and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In connection with the
Long-Term Incentive Plan, payments are typically made during the first half of the year. Payments
of $3.2 million and $2.9 million were paid during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
15
Table of Contents
In connection with the phantom unit awards granted since February 2008, the CNG Committee also
granted tandem Distribution Equivalent Rights, or DERs, which entitle the holders to receive
distributions equal to the distributions paid on the Partnerships common units. The DERs are only
applicable to the grants since 2008 that vest in 2012 through 2014 and, at the discretion of the
CNG Committee, may be included with awards granted in the future. The DERs are payable in cash
upon vesting but may be subject to forfeiture if the grantee ceases employment prior to vesting.
The unaccrued cost, associated with the outstanding grants and related DERs at September 30,
2010, was $11.8 million.
13. Equity Transactions, including Distributions
On April 7, 2010, the Partnership closed an underwritten public offering of 4,576,700 common
units at $25.17 per common unit. The Partnership received net proceeds of approximately $112.5
million from this offering, including the general partners proportionate capital contribution.
On August 13, 2010, the Partnership paid a quarterly distribution $0.54 per unit to all
holders of common units.
On September 20, 2010, the Partnership eliminated all of the incentive distribution rights
(IDRs) held by its general partner and affiliates of the general partner. As consideration for the
elimination of the IDRs, the Partnership issued 32 million common units to the holders of the IDRs.
There are now 106,027,836 common units outstanding and the general partner will retain its 2%
interest in the Partnership.
14. Subsequent Events
The following represents material events that have occurred subsequent to September 30, 2010
through the time of the Partnerships filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission:
Acquisitions
On October 4, 2010, the Partnership closed the third acquisition of reserves from Colt, LLC,
an affiliate of the Cline Group. The Partnership paid $55.0 million, funded through its credit
facility, and acquired approximately 27.4 million tons of reserves.
Distributions
On October 22, 2010, the Partnership declared a distribution of $0.54 per unit to be paid on
November 12, 2010 to unitholders of record on November 5, 2010.
16
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with the historical financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in
this filing and the financial statements and footnotes included in the Natural Resource Partners
L.P. Form 10-K/A, as filed on March 3, 2010.
Executive Overview
Our Business
We engage principally in the business of owning, managing and leasing mineral properties in
the United States. We own coal reserves in the three major U.S. coal-producing regions:
Appalachia, the Illinois Basin and the Western United States, as well as significant lignite
reserves in the Gulf Coast region. As of December 31, 2009, we owned or controlled approximately
2.1 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves. As of December 31, 2009, we also owned
approximately 130 million tons of aggregate reserves in Washington, Texas, Arizona and West
Virginia, and in 2010 have acquired additional aggregate reserves in several states across the
country. We lease our reserves to experienced mine operators under long-term leases that grant the
operators the right to mine and sell our reserves in exchange for royalty payments.
Our revenue and profitability are dependent on our lessees ability to mine and market our
reserves. Most of our coal is produced by large companies, many of which are publicly traded, with
experienced and professional sales departments. A significant portion of our coal is sold by our
lessees under coal supply contracts that have terms of one year or more. In contrast, our
aggregate properties are typically mined by regional operators with significant experience and
knowledge of the local markets. The aggregates are sold at current market prices, which
historically have increased along with the producer price index for sand and gravel. Over the long
term, both our coal and aggregate royalty revenues are affected by changes in the market for and
the market price of the commodities.
In our royalty business, our lessees generally make payments to us based on the greater of a
percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed royalty per ton of coal or aggregates they sell,
subject to minimum monthly, quarterly or annual payments. These minimum royalties are generally
recoupable over specified periods of time, which vary by lease, if sufficient royalties are
generated from production in future periods. We do not recognize these minimum royalties as
revenue until the applicable recoupment period has expired or they are recouped through production.
Until recognized as revenue, these minimum royalties are recorded as deferred revenue, a liability
on our balance sheet.
In addition to coal and aggregate royalty revenues, we generated approximately 25% of our
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from other sources, as compared to 20% for
the same period of 2009. The most significant increase in these other sources of revenue occurred
due to a substantial minimum royalty paid by Cline with respect to the Colt reserves that was
non-recoupable and therefore recognized as revenue. In addition, we received some oil and gas
revenues in the second and third quarters related to our BRP joint venture with International
Paper. Other sources of revenue include: coal processing and transportation fees; overriding
royalties; wheelage payments; rentals; property tax revenue; and timber.
Elimination of Incentive Distribution Rights
On September 20, 2010, we eliminated all of the incentive distribution rights (IDRs) held by
our general partner and affiliates of the general partner. As consideration for the elimination of
the IDRs, we issued 32 million common units to the holders of the IDRs. There are now 106,027,836
common units outstanding and the general partner will retain its 2% interest in the partnership.
Prior to the transaction, the IDRs received approximately 24% of the quarterly distribution and 48%
of any increase in the distribution. Through the elimination of the IDRs, our limited partner
unitholders will benefit from our improved cost of capital through:
| our enhanced competitive position in the acquisition markets; and |
| increased returns to limited partner unitholders from acquisition and growth projects. |
While the transaction is expected to be dilutive to cash available for distribution in the
near-term, we believe that the transaction is in the long-term best interest of the partnership.
17
Table of Contents
Our Current Liquidity Position
As of September 30, 2010, we had $261 million in available capacity under our existing credit
facility, which does not mature until March 2012, as well as approximately $72 million in cash. On
October 4, 2010, we acquired another 27.4 million tons of reserves from Colt, LLC in Illinois for
$55 million, which we funded through our credit facility.
Pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement signed in the Colt acquisition, we expect to fund
an additional $150 million over the next two years, of which approximately $70 million is
anticipated to be funded in the first quarter of 2011 as the operator achieves various development
milestones. We anticipate funding the Colt acquisition, as well as any other acquisitions that we
consummate, through the use of the available capacity under our credit facility and through the
issuance of debt and/or equity in the capital markets. We believe that we have enough liquidity to
meet our current capital needs.
In addition, other than a $35 million senior note that matures in 2013 and our revolving
credit facility, we amortize our long-term debt. Although our annual principal payments will
increase significantly beginning in 2013, we have no need to access the capital markets to pay off
or refinance any debt obligations other than the one note, and our existing debt will be reduced as
the minerals are depleted.
Current Results
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our lessees produced 37.3 million tons of coal
and aggregates, generating $168.0 million in royalty revenues from our properties, and our total
revenues were $223.9 million. Prices for both steam and metallurgical coal remained at higher
levels than we had forecasted for the third quarter of 2010. We expect the prices for
metallurgical coal to remain constant over the remainder of 2010, and because approximately 39% of
our coal royalty revenues and 33% of the related production during the first nine months of 2010
were from metallurgical coal, we expect to continue to benefit as the global economy recovers and
the demand for steel remains high.
Even though coal royalty revenues from our Appalachian properties represented 62% of our total
revenues in the first nine months of 2010, this percentage has continued to decline as we are
diligently working to diversify our holdings by expanding our presence in the Illinois Basin and
through additional aggregates and other mineral acquisitions. Our expansion into Illinois through
our partnership with Cline is through the acquisition of reserves by NRP and the development of
greenfield mines by Cline. These projects take several years to reach full production, and it is
difficult for us to forecast the timing of completion of the projects. To protect against this
risk, we are receiving significant minimum royalties with respect to each of the projects.
Although minimums provide cash to NRP that can be distributed to our limited partners, the minimums
are generally not revenue to NRP until recouped through production or at the end of the recoupment
period. Thus, to the extent that the development takes longer than anticipated to begin
production, it will impact the revenues that we receive in the future
Operations at the Gatling, West Virginia mine had not been restarted as of the end of the
third quarter. Cline, which operates the mine, has communicated to us that it does not intend to
close the mine, is continuing to maintain the mine and is currently in discussions with AEP
regarding modifications to its existing coal sales contract, as well as other potential purchasers
of the coal. In prior periods, efforts by Cline to renegotiate the price for coal from this mine
were successful. Cline continues to make its quarterly minimum payments with respect to this mine
and has also communicated that it will do so until the mine is operational. If the mine does not
become operational in future periods or discussions with potential purchasers of the coal are not
successful, we may determine that some of the assets associated with the mine have suffered
impairment. This decision and an associated impairment could have a material adverse impact on our
earnings in the period in which any impairment is recognized, but it would not impact our cash
flows from operations or our distributable cash flow.
Political, Legal and Regulatory Environment
The political, legal and regulatory environment is becoming increasingly difficult for the
coal industry. In June 2009, the White House Council on Environmental Quality announced a
Memorandum of Understanding among the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, Department of
Interior, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concerning the permitting and regulation of coal
mines in Appalachia. While the Council described this memorandum as an unprecedented step[s] to
reduce environmental impacts of mountaintop coal mining, the memorandum broadly applies to all
forms of coal mining in Appalachia. The memorandum contemplates both short-term and long-term
changes to the process for permitting and regulating coal mines in Appalachia.
These new processes, as yet undefined by EPA, impact only six Appalachian states. In
connection with this initiative, the EPA has used its authority to create significant delays in the
issuance of new permits and the modification of existing permits. The all-
18
Table of Contents
encompassing nature of the changes suggests that implementation of the memorandum will
generate continued uncertainty regarding the permitting of coal mines in Appalachia for some time
and inevitably will lead, at a minimum, to substantial delays and increased costs.
In addition to the increased oversight of the EPA, the Mine Safety and Health Administration,
or MSHA, has increased its involvement in the approval of plans and enforcement of safety issues in
connection with mining. The recent mine disaster at Masseys Upper Big Branch Mine has led to even
more scrutiny by MSHA of our lessees operations, as well as additional mine safety legislation
being considered by Congress. MSHAs involvement has increased the cost of mining due to more
frequent citations and much higher fines imposed on our lessees as well as the overall cost of
regulatory compliance. Combined with the difficult economic environment and the higher costs of
mining in general, MSHAs recent increased participation in the mine development process could
significantly delay the opening of new mines.
The United States Congress has been considering multiple bills, including cap and trade
legislation, that would regulate domestic carbon dioxide emissions, but no such bill has yet
received sufficient Congressional support for passage into law. The purpose of the proposed
legislation is to control and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States.
Greenhouse gases are gases, including carbon dioxide and methane that some scientists have argued
are contributing to warming of the Earths atmosphere and other climatic changes. Although it is
not possible at this time to predict whether or when the Congress may act on climate change
legislation, any laws or regulations that may be adopted to restrict or reduce emissions of
greenhouse gases could have an adverse effect on demand for our coal.
The existing Clean Air Act is also a possible mechanism for regulating greenhouse gases. In
April 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court rendered its decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, finding that the
EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles and
can decide against regulation only if the EPA determines that carbon dioxide does not significantly
contribute to climate change and does not endanger public health or the environment. In response
to Massachusetts v. EPA, in July 2008, the EPA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking requesting
public comment on the regulation of greenhouse gases, or GHGs. On October 27, 2009 EPA announced
how it will establish thresholds for phasing-in and regulating greenhouse gas emissions under
various provisions of the Clean Air Act. Three days later, on October 30, 2009, EPA published a
final rule in the Federal Register that requires the reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from all
sectors of the American economy, although reporting of emissions from underground coal mines and
coal suppliers as originally proposed has been deferred pending further review. On December 15,
2009, EPA published a formal determination that six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide and
methane, endanger both the public health and welfare of current and future generations. In the
same Federal Register rulemaking, EPA found that emission of greenhouse gases from new motor
vehicles and their engines contribute to greenhouse gas pollution. Although Massachusetts v. EPA
did not involve the EPAs authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources,
such as coal-fueled power plants, the decision is likely to impact regulation of stationary
sources. Several petitioners have challenged the EPAs findings in the Washington D.C. Circuit
Court of Appeals, and that litigation is ongoing.
Distributable Cash Flow
Under our partnership agreement, we are required to distribute all of our available cash each
quarter. Because distributable cash flow is a significant liquidity metric that is an indicator of
our ability to generate cash flows at a level that can sustain or support an increase in quarterly
cash distributions paid to our partners, we view it as the most important measure of our success as
a company. Distributable cash flow is also the quantitative standard used in the investment
community with respect to publicly traded partnerships.
Our distributable cash flow represents cash flow from operations less actual principal
payments and cash reserves set aside for scheduled principal payments on our senior notes.
Although distributable cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure, we believe it is a useful
adjunct to net cash provided by operating activities under GAAP. Distributable cash flow is not a
measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash
flows from operating, investing or financing activities. Distributable cash flow may not be
calculated the same for NRP as for other companies. A reconciliation of distributable cash flow to
net cash provided by operating activities is set forth below.
19
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of GAAP Net cash provided by operating activities
to Non-GAAP Distributable cash flow
(In thousands)
to Non-GAAP Distributable cash flow
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 62,107 | $ | 38,120 | $ | 175,660 | $ | 138,799 | ||||||||
Less scheduled principal payments |
(7,692 | ) | (7,693 | ) | (32,234 | ) | (17,235 | ) | ||||||||
Less reserves for future principal payments |
(7,880 | ) | (8,059 | ) | (23,819 | ) | (24,177 | ) | ||||||||
Add reserves used for scheduled principal payments |
7,692 | 7,693 | 32,234 | 17,235 | ||||||||||||
Distributable cash flow |
$ | 54,227 | $ | 30,061 | $ | 151,841 | $ | 114,622 | ||||||||
Recent Acquisitions
We are a growth-oriented company and have closed a number of acquisitions over the last
several years. Our most recent acquisitions are briefly described below.
International Paper. In June 2010, we and International Paper Company created a venture, BRP
LLC, to own and manage mineral assets previously owned by International Paper. Some of these
assets are currently subject to leases, and certain other assets have not yet been developed but
are available for future development by the venture. In exchange for a $42.5 million contribution
we became the managing and controlling member with the right to designate two of the three managers
of BRP. NRP has a 51% income interest plus a preferential cumulative annual distribution prior to
profit sharing. In exchange for the contribution of the producing properties and the properties
not currently producing, International Paper received $42.5 million in cash from BRP, a minority
voting interest and a 49% income interest after the preferential cumulative annual distribution.
The amount of the preference is fixed throughout the life of the venture but can be reduced by a
portion of the proceeds received from sales of producing properties included in the initial
acquisition. Identified tangible assets in the transaction include oil and gas, coal and aggregate
reserves, as well the rights to coal bed methane, geothermal, CO2 sequestration, water
rights, precious metals, industrial minerals and base metals. Certain properties, including oil
and gas, coal and aggregates, as well as land leased for cell towers, are currently under lease and
generating revenues.
Rockmart Slate. In June 2010, we acquired approximately 100 acres of mineral and surface
rights related to slate reserves in Rockmart, Georgia from a local operator for a purchase price of
$6.7 million.
Sierra Silica. In April 2010, we acquired the rights to silica reserves on a 1,000 acre
property in Northern California from Sierra Silica Resources LLC for $17.0 million.
North American Limestone. In April 2010, we signed an agreement to build and own for the
construction of a fine grind processing facility for high calcium carbonate limestone located in
Putnam County, Indiana. We will lease the facility to a local operator. The total cost for the
facility is not to exceed $6.5 million. As of our filing date, we have funded approximately $5.6
million of the acquisition.
Northgate-Thayer. In March 2010, we acquired approximately 100 acres of mineral and surface
rights related to dolomite limestone reserves in White County, Indiana from a local operator for a
purchase price of $7.5 million.
Massey-Override. In March 2010, we acquired from Massey Energy subsidiaries overriding
royalty interests in coal reserves located in southern West Virginia and eastern Kentucky. Total
consideration for this purchase was $3.0 million.
AzConAgg. In December 2009, we acquired approximately 230 acres of mineral and surface rights
related to sand and gravel reserves in southern Arizona from a local operator for $3.75 million.
Colt. In September 2009, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire approximately 200
million tons of coal reserves related to the Deer Run Mine in Illinois from Colt, LLC, an affiliate
of the Cline Group, through several separate transactions for a total purchase price of $255
million. In October 2010, we closed a transaction for $55.0 million and acquired approximately 27.4
million tons of reserves. As of our filing date, we had acquired approximately 50.2 million tons
of reserves associated with the initial production from the mine. Future closings anticipated
through 2012 will be associated with completion of certain milestones related to the new mines
construction.
20
Table of Contents
Blue Star. In July 2009, we acquired approximately 121 acres of limestone reserves in Wise
County, Texas from Blue Star Materials, LLC for a purchase price of $24 million.
Gatling Ohio. In May 2009, we completed the purchase of the membership interests in two
companies from Adena Minerals, LLC, an affiliate of the Cline Group. The companies own 51.5 million
tons of coal reserves and infrastructure assets at Clines Yellowbush Mine located on the Ohio
River in Meigs County, Ohio. We issued 4,560,000 common units to Adena Minerals in connection with
this acquisition. In addition, the general partner of Natural Resource Partners granted Adena
Minerals an additional nine percent interest in the general partner.
Massey- Jewell Smokeless. In March 2009, we acquired from Lauren Land Company, a subsidiary
of Massey Energy, the remaining four-fifths interest in coal reserves located in Buchanan County,
Virginia in which we previously held a one-fifth interest. Total consideration for this purchase
was $12.5 million.
Macoupin. In January 2009, we acquired approximately 82 million tons of coal reserves and
infrastructure assets related to the Shay No. 1 mine in Macoupin County, Illinois for $143.7
million from Macoupin Energy, LLC, an affiliate of the Cline Group.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended | Increase | Percentage | ||||||||||||||
September 30, | (Decrease) | Change | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percent and per ton data) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal: |
||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
$ | 4,883 | $ | 3,998 | $ | 885 | 22 | % | ||||||||
Central |
38,418 | 33,688 | 4,730 | 14 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
5,530 | 4,849 | 681 | 14 | % | |||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
48,831 | 42,535 | 6,296 | 15 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
9,278 | 5,413 | 3,865 | 71 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
2,033 | 1,359 | 674 | 50 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 60,142 | $ | 49,307 | $ | 10,835 | 22 | % | ||||||||
Production (tons) |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
1,177 | 1,238 | (61 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||||||
Central |
7,051 | 6,984 | 67 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
763 | 799 | (36 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
8,991 | 9,021 | (30 | ) | | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
2,389 | 1,723 | 666 | 39 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
987 | 539 | 448 | 83 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
12,367 | 11,283 | 1,084 | 10 | % | |||||||||||
Average gross royalty per ton |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
$ | 4.15 | $ | 3.23 | $ | 0.92 | 28 | % | ||||||||
Central |
5.45 | 4.82 | 0.63 | 13 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
7.25 | 6.07 | 1.18 | 19 | % | |||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
5.43 | 4.72 | 0.71 | 15 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
3.88 | 3.14 | 0.74 | 24 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
2.06 | 2.52 | (0.46 | ) | (18 | %) | ||||||||||
Combined average gross royalty per ton |
4.86 | 4.37 | 0.49 | 11 | % | |||||||||||
Aggregates: |
||||||||||||||||
Royalty revenue |
$ | 1,606 | $ | 1,400 | $ | 206 | 15 | % | ||||||||
Aggregate royalty bonus |
$ | | $ | 300 | $ | (300 | ) | (100 | %) | |||||||
Production |
973 | 1,148 | (175 | ) | (15 | %) | ||||||||||
Average base royalty per ton |
$ | 1.65 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 0.43 | 35 | % |
21
Table of Contents
Coal Royalty Revenues and Production. Coal royalty revenues comprised approximately 74% and
77% of our total revenue for each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The following is a discussion of the coal royalty revenues and production derived
from our major coal producing regions:
Appalachia. Primarily due to higher prices being realized by our lessees, improved royalty
rates on one of the larger leases, and a higher proportion of the production being sold as
metallurgical coal by our lessees in the Central and Southern Appalachian regions, coal royalty
revenues increased in the three month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period
of 2009. Production in each of the Appalachian regions was nearly constant. Increased production
at some mines and other mines moving onto our property offset production curtailments related to a
fire at a preparation plant, the temporary idling of a longwall mine, and other mines moving onto
adjacent property.
Illinois Basin. Production increased due to improved shipments from the Williamson property
and our Macoupin property beginning to ship some of its production. The production increase and
higher average revenue per ton combined to generate an increase in coal royalty revenue.
Northern Powder River Basin. Coal royalty revenues and production increased on our Western
Energy property due to the normal variations that occur due to the checkerboard nature of
ownership, partially offset by a sales price adjustment that occurred in 2009.
Aggregates Royalty Revenues and Production. Aggregate revenues include royalties from current
production as well as an estimate of a royalty bonus from one lessee that is determined annually
based on the profitability of the lessee. Quarter over quarter, production declined on our DuPont,
Washington property due to market conditions, offset somewhat by production on some of our recently
acquired properties. While royalty revenue increased only slightly, the average royalty per ton
increased 32% due to higher royalty rates being realized on our newly acquired properties.
22
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended | Increase | Percentage | ||||||||||||||
September 30, | (Decrease) | Change | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percent and per ton data) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal: |
||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
$ | 14,224 | $ | 9,931 | $ | 4,293 | 43 | % | ||||||||
Central |
108,751 | 101,874 | 6,877 | 7 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
15,805 | 14,755 | 1,050 | 7 | % | |||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
138,780 | 126,560 | 12,220 | 10 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
20,307 | 16,234 | 4,073 | 25 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
6,048 | 5,500 | 548 | 10 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
165,135 | $ | 148,294 | $ | 16,841 | 11 | % | |||||||||
Production (tons) |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
3,676 | 3,304 | 372 | 11 | % | |||||||||||
Central |
20,417 | 21,962 | (1,545 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||||||
Southern |
2,297 | 2,438 | (141 | ) | (6 | %) | ||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
26,390 | 27,704 | (1,314 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
5,287 | 5,005 | 282 | 6 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
3,259 | 2,840 | 419 | 15 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
34,936 | 35,549 | (613 | ) | (2 | %) | ||||||||||
Average gross royalty per ton |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
$ | 3.87 | $ | 3.01 | $ | 0.86 | 29 | % | ||||||||
Central |
5.33 | 4.64 | 0.69 | 15 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
6.88 | 6.05 | 0.83 | 14 | % | |||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
5.26 | 4.57 | 0.69 | 15 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
3.84 | 3.24 | 0.60 | 19 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
1.86 | 1.94 | (0.08 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||||||
Combined average gross
royalty per ton |
4.73 | 4.17 | 0.56 | 13 | % | |||||||||||
Aggregates: |
||||||||||||||||
Royalty revenue |
$ | 3,486 | $ | 3,377 | $ | 109 | 3 | % | ||||||||
Aggregate royalty bonus |
$ | (639 | ) | $ | 1,320 | $ | (1,959 | ) | (148 | %) | ||||||
Production |
2,356 | 2,629 | (273 | ) | (10 | %) | ||||||||||
Average base royalty per ton |
$ | 1.48 | $ | 1.28 | $ | 0.20 | 16 | % |
Coal Royalty Revenues and Production. Coal royalty revenues comprised approximately 74% and
78% of our total revenue for each of the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The following is a discussion of the coal royalty revenues and production derived
from our major coal producing regions:
Appalachia. Primarily due to higher prices being realized by our lessees, improved royalty
rates on one of the larger leases and a higher proportion of the production being sold as
metallurgical coal by our lessees in all of the Appalachian regions, coal royalty revenues
increased in the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.
The factors causing higher coal royalty revenue more than offset the lower production in the
Central and Southern Appalachian regions. This lower production was due to a number of factors,
including temporary idling of mines, production curtailments related to a fire at a preparation
plant and some mines moving to adjacent properties.
Illinois Basin. Production increased primarily due to the mine starting production on our
Macoupin property. The production increase, combined with a higher royalty per ton being realized,
resulted in an increase in coal royalty revenues.
Northern Powder River Basin. Coal royalty revenues and production increased on our Western
Energy property due to the normal variations that occur due to the checkerboard nature of
ownership.
23
Table of Contents
Aggregates Royalty Revenues and Production. Aggregate revenues include royalties from current
production as well as an estimate of a royalty bonus from one lessee that is determined annually
based on the profitability of the lessee. Year over year, production declined on our DuPont,
Washington property due to market conditions, offset somewhat by production on some of our recently
acquired properties. While royalty revenue increased only slightly, the average royalty per ton
increased 16% due to higher royalty rates being realized on our newly acquired properties. The
royalty bonus reflects an adjustment to the estimated accrual based upon the actual bonus received
in the second quarter related to 2009. The bonus accrual is based upon the lessees historical
performance and the actual bonus paid with respect to 2009 was significantly less than prior years
due to the downturn in the economy.
Other Operating Results
In addition to coal and aggregate royalty revenues, we generated approximately 25% of our nine
months ended September 30, 2010 revenues from other sources, as compared to 20% for the same period
of 2009. The most significant increase in these other sources of revenue occurred due to a
substantial minimum royalty paid by Cline with respect to the Colt reserves that is non-recoupable
and therefore recognized as revenue. In addition, we received an oil and gas lease bonus as well
as oil and gas revenues related to our BRP joint venture with International Paper. Other sources
of revenue include: coal processing and transportation fees; overriding royalties; wheelage
payments; rentals; property tax revenue; and timber. Included in other income was a $1.9 million
payment from the State of West Virginia for the granting of an easement on our surface property.
Coal Processing and Transportation Revenues. We generated $2.3 million and $1.5 million in
processing revenues for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $6.7
million and $5.8 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We do not operate the preparation plants, but receive a fee for coal processed
through them. Similar to our coal royalty structure, the throughput fees are based on a percentage
of the ultimate sales price for the coal that is processed through the facilities.
In addition to our preparation plants, we own coal handling and transportation infrastructure
in West Virginia, Ohio and Illinois. In contrast to our typical royalty structure, we receive a
fixed rate per ton for coal transported over these facilities. For the assets other than our
loadout facility at the Shay No. 1 mine in Illinois, we operate coal handling and transportation
infrastructure and have subcontracted out that responsibility to third parties. We generated
transportation fees from these assets of approximately $4.3 million and $3.0 million for the
quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and $11.1 million and $8.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Operating costs and expenses. Included in total expenses are:
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization of $16.2 million and $13.0 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $44.0 million and $48.0 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a one-time expense of $8.2 million for a terminated lease due to a mine closure. Excluding this one-time expense, depletion increased approximately $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This increase is primarily due to a refinement in the estimate on our contract amortization of approximately $2.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and $5.9 million for the nine months period ended September 30, 2010, partially offset by slightly lower production for the year to date period. |
| General and administrative expenses were $8.8 million and $4.6 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $22.1 million and $17.9 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increases in general and administrative expense is primarily due to accruals under our long-term incentive plan attributable to fluctuations in our unit price and $2.2 million of transaction costs associated with the business combination with International Paper Company. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense was higher for the first nine months of 2010 when compared
to the first nine months of 2009 due to the issuance of senior notes in 2009 at higher interest
rates.
24
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows and Capital Expenditures
We satisfy our working capital requirements with cash generated from operations. We finance
our property acquisitions with available cash, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and
the issuance of our senior notes and additional units. While our ability to satisfy our debt
service obligations and pay distributions to our unitholders depends in large part on our future
operating performance, our ability to make acquisitions will depend on prevailing economic
conditions in the financial markets as well as the coal industry and other factors, some of which
are beyond our control. For a more complete discussion of factors that will affect cash flow we
generate from our operations, please read Item 1A. Risk Factors. in our Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2009. Our capital expenditures, other than for acquisitions, have historically
been minimal.
Net cash provided by operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was
$175.7 million and $138.8 million, respectively. Approximately 70% to 80% of our cash provided by
operations has historically been generated from coal royalty revenues.
Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
was $114.7 million and $116.1 million, respectively. Substantially all of our investing activities
consisted of acquiring coal reserves, plant and equipment and other mineral rights.
Net cash flows used in financing for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $71.4
million. During the first nine months of 2010, we had proceeds from loans of $85.0 million offset
by repayment of debt of $106.2 million and retirements of $9.2 million in obligations related to
the purchase of coal reserves and infrastructure. We received proceeds from the issuance of units
of $110.4 million, paid fees associated with the elimination of the IDRs of $2.2 million and paid
distributions of $151.4 million. During the same period for 2009, net cash used in financing
activities was $51.7 million, which included proceeds from loans of $325.0 million, principal
repayments of $168.2 million, retirement of obligations related to acquisitions of $63.0 million
and $144.8 million for distributions to partners.
Most of our lessees are required to make minimum annual or quarterly payments, which are
generally recoupable against future production royalties. These minimum payments increase cash
flows in the period received, but may not increase revenues until recouped against production
royalties or the contractual recoupment period expires. Total deferred revenue as of September 30,
2010 increased $29.3 million since December 31, 2009 to $96.3 million primarily as a result of
minimums paid by the Cline Group related to their operations that have not been recouped through
production. These minimums may reduce future cash flows when lessees recoup against production
royalties.
Long-Term Debt
At September 30, 2010, our debt consisted of:
| $39 million of our $300 million floating rate revolving credit facility, due March 2012; | ||
| $35 million of 5.55% senior notes due 2013; | ||
| $37.7 million of 4.91% senior notes due 2018; | ||
| $150 million of 8.38% senior notes due 2019; | ||
| $76.9 million of 5.05% senior notes due 2020; | ||
| $2.1 million of 5.31% utility local improvement obligation due 2021; | ||
| $36.9 million of 5.55% senior notes due 2023; | ||
| $210 million of 5.82% senior notes due 2024; and | ||
| $50 million of 8.92% senior notes due 2024. |
Other than the 5.55% senior notes due 2013, which have semi-annual interest payments, all of
our senior notes require annual principal payments in addition to semi-annual interest payments.
The principal payments on the 5.82% senior notes due 2024 began March 2010, the principal payments
of the 8.38% senior notes due in 2019 do not begin until March 2013 and the principal payments of
the 8.92% senior notes do not begin until March 2014. We also make annual principal and interest
payments on the utility local improvement obligation.
25
Table of Contents
Credit Facility. We have a $300 million revolving credit facility, and as of our filing date
we had approximately $206 million available to us under the facility. Under an accordion feature
in the credit facility, we may request our lenders to increase their aggregate commitment to a
maximum of $450 million on the same terms. However, we cannot be certain that our lenders will
elect to participate in the accordion feature. To the extent the lenders decline to participate,
we may elect to bring new lenders into the facility, but cannot make any assurance that the
additional credit capacity will be available to us on existing or comparable terms.
Our obligations under the credit facility are unsecured but are guaranteed by our operating
subsidiaries. We may prepay all loans at any time without penalty. Indebtedness under the
revolving credit facility bears interest, at our option, at either:
| the higher of the federal funds rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0% to 0.50% or the prime rate as announced by the agent bank; or | ||
| at a rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.45% to 1.50%. |
We incur a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at a rate
ranging from 0.10% to 0.30% per annum.
The credit agreement governing the facility contains covenants requiring us to maintain:
| a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of 3.75 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters; provided however, if during one of those quarters we have made an acquisition, then the ratio shall not exceed 4.0 to 1.0 for the quarter in which the acquisition occurred and (1) if the acquisition is in the first half of the quarter, the next two quarters or (2) if the acquisition is in the second half of the quarter, the next three quarters; and | ||
| a ratio of consolidated EBITDDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated lease operating expense) of 4.0 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters. |
Senior Notes. NRP Operating LLC issued the senior notes under a note purchase agreement. The
senior notes are unsecured but are guaranteed by our operating subsidiaries. We may prepay the
senior notes at any time together with a make-whole amount (as defined in the note purchase
agreement). If any event of default exists under the note purchase agreement, the noteholders will
be able to accelerate the maturity of the senior notes and exercise other rights and remedies.
The note purchase agreement contains covenants requiring our operating subsidiary to:
| not permit debt secured by certain liens and debt of subsidiaries to exceed 10% of consolidated net tangible assets (as defined in the note purchase agreement); and | ||
| maintain the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated operating lease expense) at not less than 3.5 to 1.00. |
In March 2009, we issued $150 million of 8.38% notes maturing in March 2019 and $50 million of
8.92% notes maturing in March 2024. These senior notes provide that in the event that our leverage
ratio exceeds 3.75 to 1.00 at the end of any fiscal quarter, then in addition to all other interest
accruing on these notes, additional interest in the amount of 2.00% per annum shall accrue on the
notes for the two succeeding quarters and for as long thereafter as the leverage ratio remains
above 3.75 to 1.00.
Shelf Registration Statement/Equity Transactions
In addition to our credit facility, we maintain an automatically effective shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 with the SEC that is available for registered offerings of common units and
debt securities. The amounts, prices and timing of the issuance and sale of any equity or debt
securities will depend on market conditions, our capital requirements and compliance with our
credit facility and senior notes.
On April 7, 2010, we closed an underwritten public offering of 4,576,700 common units at
$25.17 per common unit. We used a portion of the net proceeds of approximately $112.5 million from
this offering, including our general partners proportionate capital contribution, to repay all of
the indebtedness outstanding under our credit facility and used the remaining cash for
acquisitions.
On September 20, 2010, we eliminated all of the incentive distribution rights (IDRs) held by
our general partner and affiliates of the general partner. As consideration for the elimination of
the IDRs, we issued 32 million common units to the holders of the IDRs. There are now 106,027,836
common units outstanding and the general partner will retain its 2% interest in NRP.
26
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or related
parties and accordingly, there are no off-balance sheet risks to our liquidity and capital
resources from unconsolidated entities.
Related Party Transactions
Reimbursements to our General Partner
Our general partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation for its
management of Natural Resource Partners L.P. However, in accordance with our partnership agreement,
we reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for expenses incurred on our behalf. All
direct general and administrative expenses are charged to us as incurred. We also reimburse
indirect general and administrative costs, including certain legal, accounting, treasury,
information technology, insurance, administration of employee benefits and other corporate services
incurred by our general partner and its affiliates. Cost reimbursements due our general partner
may be substantial and will reduce our cash available for distribution to unitholders. The
reimbursements to our general partner for services performed by Western Pocahontas Properties and
Quintana Minerals Corporation are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Reimbursement for services |
$ | 1,823 | $ | 1,678 | $ | 5,403 | $ | 5,107 | ||||||||
For additional information, please read Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence Omnibus Agreement in our annual report filed on Form 10K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
We lease substantially all of two floors of an office building in Huntington, West Virginia
from Western Pocahontas at market rates. The terms of the lease were approved by our Conflicts
Committee. We pay $0.5 million each year in lease payments.
Transactions with Cline Affiliates
Various companies controlled by Chris Cline lease coal reserves from NRP, and we provide coal
transportation services to them for a fee. Mr. Cline, both individually and through another
affiliate, Adena Minerals, LLC, owns a 31% interest in NRPs general partner, as well as 21,017,441
common units. At September 30, 2010, we had accounts receivable totaling $7.3 million from Cline
affiliates. Revenues from Cline affiliates are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
$ | 9,873 | $ | 5,499 | $ | 22,655 | $ | 16,049 | ||||||||
Coal processing fees |
344 | | 785 | | ||||||||||||
Transportation fees |
4,271 | 2,758 | 10,671 | 7,991 | ||||||||||||
Minimums recognized as revenue |
3,100 | | 9,300 | | ||||||||||||
Override revenue |
718 | 834 | 1,437 | 1,604 | ||||||||||||
$ | 18,306 | $ | 9,091 | $ | 44,848 | $ | 25,644 | |||||||||
As of September 30, 2010, we have received $42.0 million in minimum royalty payments to date
that have not been recouped by Cline affiliates of which $17.8 million was received in the current
year.
27
Table of Contents
Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd.
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. is a principal in Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd., which controls
several private equity funds focused on investments in the energy business. In connection with the
formation of Quintana Capital, we adopted a formal conflicts policy that establishes the
opportunities that will be pursued by NRP and those that will be pursued by Quintana Capital. The
governance documents of Quintana Capitals affiliated investment funds reflect the guidelines set
forth in NRPs conflicts policy.
A fund controlled by Quintana Capital owns a significant membership interest in Taggart Global
USA, LLC, including the right to nominate two members of Taggarts 5-person board of directors. We
currently have a memorandum of understanding with Taggart Global pursuant to which the two
companies have agreed to jointly pursue the development of coal handling and preparation plants.
We will own and lease the plants to Taggart Global, which will design, build and operate the
plants. The lease payments are based on the sales price for the coal that is processed through the
facilities. To date, we have acquired four facilities under this agreement with Taggart with a
total cost of $46.6 million. Revenues from Taggart are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal processing revenue |
$ | 1,666 | $ | 1,017 | $ | 4,014 | $ | 2,910 | ||||||||
At September 30, 2010, we had accounts receivable totaling $0.4 million from Taggart.
In June 2007, a fund controlled by Quintana Capital acquired Kopper-Glo, a small coal mining
company that is one of our lessees with operations in Tennessee. Revenues from Kopper-Glo are as
follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenue |
$ | 363 | $ | 392 | $ | 1,195 | $ | 1,223 | ||||||||
We also had accounts receivable totaling $0.1 million from Kopper-Glo at September 30, 2010.
Environmental
The operations our lessees conduct on our properties are subject to environmental laws and
regulations adopted by various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which these
operations are conducted. As an owner of surface interests in some properties, we may be liable
for certain environmental conditions occurring at the surface properties. The terms of
substantially all of our leases require the lessee to comply with all applicable laws and
regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. Lessees post reclamation bonds assuring
that reclamation will be completed as required by the relevant permit, and substantially all of the
leases require the lessee to indemnify us against, among other things, environmental liabilities.
Some of these indemnifications survive the termination of the lease. Because we have no employees,
employees of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership make regular visits to the mines to
ensure compliance with lease terms, but the duty to comply with all regulations rests with the
lessees. We believe that our lessees will be able to comply with existing regulations and do not
expect any lessees failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations to have a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We have neither incurred, nor are
aware of, any material environmental charges imposed on us related to our properties as of
September 30, 2010. We are not associated with any environmental contamination that may require
remediation costs. However, our lessees regularly conduct reclamation work on the properties under
lease to them. Because we are not the permittee of the operations on our properties, we are not
responsible for the costs associated with these operations. In addition, West Virginia has
established a fund to satisfy any shortfall in our lessees reclamation obligations.
28
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk, which includes adverse changes in commodity prices and interest
rates as discussed below:
Commodity Price Risk
We are dependent upon the effective marketing and efficient mining of our coal reserves by our
lessees. Our lessees sell coal under various long-term and short-term contracts as well as on the
spot market. A large portion of these sales are under long-term contracts. A substantial or
extended decline in coal prices could materially and adversely affect us in two ways. First, lower
prices may reduce the quantity of coal that may be economically produced from our properties.
This, in turn, could reduce our coal royalty revenues and the value of our coal reserves. Second,
even if production is not reduced, the royalties we receive on each ton of coal sold may be
reduced. Additionally, volatility in coal prices could make it difficult to estimate with
precision the value of our coal reserves and any coal reserves that we may consider for
acquisition.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, which are subject to variable interest rates based upon LIBOR. As of our filing
date, we had $94 million outstanding in variable interest rate debt.
29
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
NRP carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed
under the supervision and with the participation of NRP management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of NRP. Based
upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that (a) the
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and (b) such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal
quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
30
Table of Contents
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved, from time to time, in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of business. While the ultimate results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with
certainty, our management believes these claims will not have a material effect on our financial
position, liquidity or operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
During the period covered by this report, there were no material changes from the risk factors
previously disclosed in Natural Resource Partners L.P.s Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
None.
31
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
3.1
|
| Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Natural Resource Partners L.P., dated as of September 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2010). | ||
3.2
|
| Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of NRP (GP) LP, dated as of September 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2010). | ||
10.1
|
| Amendment No. 2 to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2010, by and between WPP LLC and Colt, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 5, 2010). | ||
10.2
|
| Contribution Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2010, by and among Natural Resource Partners L.P., NRP (GP) LP, Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership, Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership, New Gauley Coal Corporation and NRP Investment L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2010) | ||
31.1*
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley. | ||
31.2*
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley. | ||
32.1*
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. | ||
32.2*
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. | ||
99.1
|
| Description of certain provisions of the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Natural Resource Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2010) | ||
101*
|
| The following financial information from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Natural Resource Partners L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
* | Submitted herewith. |
32
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned and thereunto duly authorized.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P. By: NRP (GP) LP, its general partner |
||||
By: | GP NATURAL RESOURCE | |||
PARTNERS LLC, its general partner |
Date: November 5, 2010
By: | /s/ Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. | |||
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr., | ||||
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: November 5, 2010
By: | /s/ Dwight L. Dunlap | |||
Dwight L. Dunlap, | ||||
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
Date: November 5, 2010
By: | /s/ Kenneth Hudson | |||
Kenneth Hudson | ||||
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
33