NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-31465
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 35-2164875 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
601 Jefferson Street, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(713) 751-7507
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large
accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer þ | Accelerated Filer o | Non-accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At August 5, 2011 there were 106,027,836 Common Units outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements included in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our
representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements that are also
forward-looking statements.
Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding capital
expenditures, acquisitions and dispositions, expected commencement dates of mining, projected
quantities of future production by our lessees and projected demand for or supply of coal and
aggregates that will affect sales levels, prices and royalties and other revenues realized by us.
These forward-looking statements are made based upon managements current plans, expectations,
estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a
number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees
and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements.
You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Please read Item 1A.
Risk Factors in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for important factors that
could cause our actual results of operations or our actual financial condition to differ.
3
Table of Contents
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except unit data)
(In thousands, except unit data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 145,705 | $ | 95,506 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
31,728 | 26,195 | ||||||
Accounts receivable affiliates |
4,713 | 7,915 | ||||||
Other |
438 | 910 | ||||||
Total current assets |
182,584 | 130,526 | ||||||
Land |
24,543 | 24,543 | ||||||
Plant and equipment, net |
57,438 | 62,348 | ||||||
Coal and other mineral rights, net |
1,367,532 | 1,281,636 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
156,775 | 161,931 | ||||||
Loan financing costs, net |
3,272 | 2,436 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
556 | 616 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,792,700 | $ | 1,664,036 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 1,402 | $ | 1,388 | ||||
Accounts payable affiliates |
| 499 | ||||||
Obligation related to acquisitions |
4,100 | | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
30,801 | 31,518 | ||||||
Accrued incentive plan expenses current portion |
6,444 | 6,788 | ||||||
Property, franchise and other taxes payable |
5,513 | 6,926 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
11,679 | 9,811 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
59,939 | 56,930 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
122,707 | 109,509 | ||||||
Accrued incentive plan expenses |
10,561 | 11,347 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
793,961 | 661,070 | ||||||
Partners capital: |
||||||||
Common units outstanding (106,027,836) |
787,560 | 806,529 | ||||||
General partners interest |
13,750 | 14,132 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest |
4,743 | 5,065 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(521 | ) | (546 | ) | ||||
Total partners capital |
805,532 | 825,180 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners capital |
$ | 1,792,700 | $ | 1,664,036 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per unit data)
(In thousands, except per unit data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Coal royalties |
$ | 69,788 | $ | 57,832 | $ | 135,153 | $ | 104,993 | ||||||||
Aggregate royalties |
1,831 | 350 | 3,025 | 1,241 | ||||||||||||
Coal processing fees |
3,173 | 2,693 | 6,262 | 4,337 | ||||||||||||
Transportation fees |
3,745 | 4,043 | 7,843 | 6,818 | ||||||||||||
Oil and gas royalties |
1,996 | 2,087 | 4,988 | 3,186 | ||||||||||||
Property taxes |
3,577 | 2,782 | 6,589 | 5,433 | ||||||||||||
Minimums recognized as revenue |
1,841 | 3,418 | 2,348 | 6,792 | ||||||||||||
Override royalties |
3,492 | 3,157 | 6,535 | 6,124 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,966 | 3,225 | 3,518 | 4,182 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
91,409 | 79,587 | 176,261 | 143,106 | ||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
16,166 | 16,485 | 30,488 | 27,853 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
6,439 | 6,794 | 16,635 | 13,342 | ||||||||||||
Property, franchise and other taxes |
3,306 | 3,498 | 7,003 | 7,232 | ||||||||||||
Transportation costs |
523 | 557 | 991 | 822 | ||||||||||||
Coal royalty and override payments |
159 | 301 | 467 | 993 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
26,593 | 27,635 | 55,584 | 50,242 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
64,816 | 51,952 | 120,677 | 92,864 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(12,429 | ) | (10,346 | ) | (23,016 | ) | (21,075 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
16 | 4 | 24 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Income before non-controlling interest |
$ | 52,403 | $ | 41,610 | $ | 97,685 | $ | 71,801 | ||||||||
Less non-controlling interest |
(51 | ) | | (51 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 52,352 | $ | 41,610 | $ | 97,634 | $ | 71,801 | ||||||||
Net income attributable to: |
||||||||||||||||
General partner |
$ | 1,047 | $ | 573 | $ | 1,953 | $ | 917 | ||||||||
Holders of incentive distribution rights |
$ | | $ | 12,983 | $ | | $ | 25,966 | ||||||||
Limited partners |
$ | 51,305 | $ | 28,054 | $ | 95,681 | $ | 44,918 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit |
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 0.63 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of units outstanding |
106,028 | 74,028 | 106,028 | 71,752 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 97,634 | $ | 71,801 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
30,488 | 27,853 | ||||||
Non-cash interest charge, net |
268 | 291 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest |
51 | | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(2,331 | ) | (5,085 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
532 | 119 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(485 | ) | 98 | |||||
Accrued interest |
1,868 | (322 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
13,198 | 20,641 | ||||||
Accrued incentive plan expenses |
(1,130 | ) | (1,340 | ) | ||||
Property, franchise and other taxes payable |
(1,413 | ) | (503 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
138,680 | 113,553 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of land, coal and other mineral rights |
(99,368 | ) | (110,411 | ) | ||||
Acquisition or construction of plant and equipment |
(325 | ) | (2,102 | ) | ||||
Disposition of assets |
1,100 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(98,593 | ) | (112,513 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from loans |
335,000 | 81,000 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
(1,052 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of units |
| 110,436 | ||||||
Repayment of loans |
(202,826 | ) | (98,542 | ) | ||||
Capital contribution |
| 2,350 | ||||||
Payment of obligation related to acquisitions |
(4,025 | ) | (2,969 | ) | ||||
Costs associated with equity transactions |
(140 | ) | (152 | ) | ||||
Distributions to partners |
(116,845 | ) | (97,387 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
10,112 | (5,264 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
50,199 | (4,224 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
95,506 | 82,634 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 145,705 | $ | 78,410 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 20,859 | $ | 21,070 | ||||
Non-cash activities: |
||||||||
Mineral rights to be received |
$ | | $ | 13,249 | ||||
Non-controlling interest |
$ | 373 | $ | (7,335 | ) | |||
Obligation related to purchase of reserves and infrastructure |
$ | 4,100 | $ | 6,200 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation and Organization
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for future periods.
You should refer to the information contained in the footnotes included in Natural Resource
Partners L.P.s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K in connection with the reading of these unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements.
The Partnership engages principally in the business of owning, managing and leasing mineral
properties in the United States. The Partnership owns coal reserves in the three major
coal-producing regions of the United States: Appalachia, the Illinois Basin and the Western United
States, as well as lignite reserves in the Gulf Coast region. The Partnership also owns aggregate
reserves in several states across the country. The Partnership does not operate any mines on its
properties, but leases reserves to experienced operators under long-term leases that grant the
operators the right to mine the Partnerships reserves in exchange for royalty payments. Lessees
are generally required to make payments based on the higher of a percentage of the gross sales
price or a fixed royalty per ton, in addition to a minimum payment.
In addition, the Partnership owns transportation and preparation equipment, other coal related
rights and oil and gas properties on which it earns revenue.
The general partner of the Partnership is NRP (GP) LP, a Delaware limited partnership, whose
general partner is GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB amended the presentation of comprehensive income. The amendments in
this update give the Partnership the option to present the total comprehensive income, the
components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single
continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. These
amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2011. The Partnership has not determined which method of presentation it will
elect.
In May 2011, the FASB amended fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The
amendments result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). Some of the amendments clarify the FASBs
intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments
change a particular principal or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information
about fair value measurements. The amendment likely to have the most impact on the Partnership
relates to the fair value disclosure of the senior notes quantitative information about
unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements, that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy. These amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Partnership does not expect this adoption to
have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other
standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Partnerships financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
3. Significant Acquisitions
NBR Sand. In June 2011, the Partnership acquired an overriding royalty interest in
approximately 711 acres of frac sand reserves near Tyler, TX for $16.5 million, of which $14.4
million was funded at closing and the remaining $2.1 million was paid in July 2011.
7
Table of Contents
CALX Resources. In February 2011, the Partnership acquired approximately 500 acres of mineral
and surface rights related to limestone reserves on the Tennessee River near Paducah, Kentucky for
$16.0 million, of which $14.0 million has been paid at June 30, 2011 and the remaining $2.0 million
will be paid as certain milestones are completed.
BRP LLC. In June 2010, the Partnership and International Paper Company (IPC) formed BRP to
own and manage mineral assets previously owned by IPC. Some of these assets are currently subject
to leases, and certain other assets are available for future development by the venture. In
exchange for a $42.5 million contribution, NRP became the controlling member with the right to
designate two of the three managers of BRP. NRP has a 51% income interest plus a preferential
cumulative annual distribution prior to profit sharing. In exchange for the contribution of the
producing properties and the properties not currently producing, IPC received $42.5 million in
cash, a minority voting interest and a 49% income interest after the preferential cumulative annual
distribution. The amount of the preference is fixed throughout the life of the venture but can be
reduced by a portion of the proceeds received from sales of producing properties included in the
initial acquisition. Identified tangible assets included in the transaction are oil and gas, coal,
and aggregate reserves, as well the rights to other unidentified minerals which may include coal
bed methane, geothermal, CO2 sequestration, water rights, precious metals, industrial
minerals and base metals. Certain properties, including oil and gas, coal and aggregates, as well
as land leased for cell towers, are currently under lease and generating revenues.
The transaction was accounted for as a business combination and, at June 30, 2011, the assets
and liabilities of the venture are included in the consolidated balance sheet. The allocation of
the purchase price was based on independent third party valuations. The following table summarizes
the final allocation of the purchase price and preliminary estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed for the BRP transaction:
Initial | ||||||||
Final | Estimated | |||||||
Fair Value | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Coal and other mineral rights |
$ | 45,329 | $ | 45,759 | ||||
Intangible assets |
$ | 1,863 | $ | 1,806 | ||||
Capital contribution |
$ | 42,500 | $ | 42,500 | ||||
Non-controlling interests |
$ | 4,692 | $ | 5,065 |
Approximately $38.3 million of the total $47.2 million asset fair value, as well as the value
of the $4.7 million non-controlling interest, were estimated using an expected cash flows approach.
The remaining assets fair value was determined using a market approach. See Note 8, Fair Value.
Operations of the venture are included from June 1, 2010, the effective date of acquisition.
Total net income from startup through December 31, 2010 was $2.3 million and for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 was $1.7 million. The venture operating agreement provides that net income of
the venture only be allocated to the non-controlling interests after the preferential cumulative
annual distribution.
Transaction expenses related to the acquisition through December 31, 2010 were $2.5 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, transaction expenses were $0.4 million and are included in
general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Sierra Silica. In April 2010, the Partnership acquired the rights to silica reserves on
approximately 1,000 acres of property in Northern California for $17.0 million.
Colt. In September 2009, the Partnership signed a definitive agreement to acquire
approximately 200 million tons of coal reserves related to the Deer Run Mine in Illinois from Colt,
LLC, an affiliate of the Cline Group, through several separate transactions for a total purchase
price of $255 million. As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership had acquired approximately 92.1
million tons of reserves for approximately $175 million, including $70.0 million paid during the
first quarter 2011. Future closings anticipated through 2012 will be associated with completion of
certain milestones related to the new mine.
8
Table of Contents
4. Plant and Equipment
The Partnerships plant and equipment consist of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Asset held for sale |
$ | 1,802 | $ | | ||||
Plant construction in-process |
| 6,279 | ||||||
Plant and equipment at cost |
83,019 | 81,906 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(27,383 | ) | (25,837 | ) | ||||
Net book value |
$ | 57,438 | $ | 62,348 | ||||
Under the provisions of one of the Partnerships tipple leases, the lessee exercised its
option to purchase the tipple and corresponding land for fair market value, which is greater than
the carrying amount of the asset. In May 2011, the lessee paid a $1.0 million deposit that is
nonrefundable and will be applied to the purchase price if the lessee proceeds. The Partnership
believes it is very likely the lessee will proceed and has classified the net book value of the
tipple and corresponding land, less the $1.0 million paid, as an asset held for sale.
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Total depreciation expense on plant and equipment |
$ | 4,235 | $ | 4,159 | ||||
5. Coal and Other Mineral Rights
The Partnerships coal and other mineral rights consist of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Coal and other mineral rights |
$ | 1,736,223 | $ | 1,629,286 | ||||
Less accumulated depletion and amortization |
(368,691 | ) | (347,650 | ) | ||||
Net book value |
$ | 1,367,532 | $ | 1,281,636 | ||||
9
Table of Contents
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Total depletion and amortization expense on coal and other mineral rights |
$ | 21,041 | $ | 18,489 | ||||
6. Intangible Assets
Amounts recorded as intangible assets along with the balances and accumulated amortization are
reflected in the table below:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Contract intangibles |
$ | 180,291 | $ | 180,233 | ||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(23,516 | ) | (18,302 | ) | ||||
Net book value |
$ | 156,775 | $ | 161,931 | ||||
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Total amortization expense on intangible assets |
$ | 5,212 | $ | 5,203 | ||||
The estimates of future expense for the periods indicated below are based on current mining
plans, which are subject to revision in future periods.
Estimated | ||||
Amortization | ||||
Expense | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
Remainder of 2011 |
$ | 9,887 | ||
For year ended December 31, 2012 |
11,193 | |||
For year ended December 31, 2013 |
10,538 | |||
For year ended December 31, 2014 |
10,538 | |||
For year ended December 31, 2015 |
10,538 |
10
Table of Contents
7. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
$300 million floating rate revolving credit facility, due March 2012 |
$ | | $ | 94,000 | ||||
5.55% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and
December, maturing June 2013 |
35,000 | 35,000 | ||||||
4.91% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and
December, with annual principal payments in June, maturing in June 2018 |
32,317 | 37,650 | ||||||
8.38% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in March and
September, with scheduled principal payments beginning March 2013,
maturing in March 2019 |
150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
5.05% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in January and
July, with annual principal payments in July, maturing in July 2020 |
76,923 | 76,923 | ||||||
5.31% utility local improvement obligation, with annual principal and
interest payments, maturing in March 2021 |
1,922 | 2,115 | ||||||
5.55% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and
December, with annual principal payments in June, maturing in June 2023 |
33,600 | 36,900 | ||||||
4.73% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and
December, with scheduled principal payments beginning December 2014,
maturing in December 2023 |
75,000 | | ||||||
5.82% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in March and
September, with annual principal payments in March, maturing in March
2024 |
195,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
8.92% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in March and
September, with scheduled principal payments beginning March 2014,
maturing in March 2024 |
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
5.03% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and
December, with scheduled principal payments beginning December 2014,
maturing in December 2026 |
175,000 | | ||||||
Total debt |
824,762 | 692,588 | ||||||
Less current portion of long term debt |
(30,801 | ) | (31,518 | ) | ||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 793,961 | $ | 661,070 | ||||
Principal payments due in:
Senior Notes | Credit Facility | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Remainder of 2011 |
$ | 7,692 | $ | | $ | 7,692 | ||||||
2012 |
30,801 | | 30,801 | |||||||||
2013 |
87,230 | | 87,230 | |||||||||
2014 |
77,136 | | 77,136 | |||||||||
2015 |
77,136 | | 77,136 | |||||||||
Thereafter |
544,767 | | 544,767 | |||||||||
$ | 824,762 | $ | | $ | 824,762 | |||||||
The senior note purchase agreement contains covenants requiring our operating subsidiary to:
| Maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the note purchase agreement) of no more than 4.0 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters; | ||
| not permit debt secured by certain liens and debt of subsidiaries to exceed 10% of consolidated net tangible assets (as defined in the note purchase agreement); and | ||
| maintain the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated operating lease expense) at not less than 3.5 to 1.0. |
11
Table of Contents
The 8.38% and 8.92% senior notes also provide that in the event that the Partnerships
leverage ratio exceeds 3.75 to 1.00 at the end of any fiscal quarter, then in addition to all other
interest accruing on these notes, additional interest in the amount of 2.00% per annum shall accrue
on the notes for the two succeeding quarters and for as long thereafter as the leverage ratio
remains above 3.75 to 1.00.
In the second quarter, the Partnership issued $250 million of senior unsecured notes and is
committed to issue another $50 million of unsecured senior notes in October of this year. Proceeds
from the senior notes were used to repay all of the outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit facility and the Partnership has used, or will use, the remaining proceeds for acquisitions.
A summary of the four tranches of senior notes are as follows:
Series | Amount | Interest Rate | Issue Date | Maturity | ||||||||||||
H |
$75 million | 4.73 | % | April 20, 2011 | December 1, 2023 | |||||||||||
I |
$125 million | 5.03 | % | April 20, 2011 | December 1, 2026 | |||||||||||
J |
$50 million | 5.03 | % | June 15, 2011 | December 1, 2026 | |||||||||||
K |
$50 million | 5.18 | % | October 3, 2011 | December 1, 2026 |
All tranches have semi-annual interest payments beginning December 1, 2011, and equal annual
principal payments beginning December 1, 2014.
The Partnership made principal payments of $23.8 million on its senior notes during the six
months ended June 30, 2011.
The Partnership has a $300 million revolving credit facility, and at June 30, 2011, the full
amount was available under the facility. The Partnership incurs a commitment fee on the undrawn
portion of the revolving credit facility at rates ranging from 0.10% to 0.30% per annum. Under an
accordion feature in the credit facility, the Partnership may request its lenders to increase their
aggregate commitment to a maximum of $450 million on the same terms. However, the Partnership
cannot be certain that its lenders will elect to participate in the accordion feature. To the
extent the lenders decline to participate, the Partnership may elect to bring new lenders into the
facility, but cannot make any assurance that the additional credit capacity will be available on
existing or comparable terms.
At June 30, 2011 the Partnership did not have any outstanding balance on its revolving credit
facility, while at December 31, 2010 the Partnership had $94.0 million outstanding on its revolving
credit facility. The weighted average interest rates for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
the year ended December 31, 2010 were 1.83% and 1.42%, respectively.
The revolving credit facility contains covenants requiring the Partnership to maintain:
| a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of 3.75 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters; provided however, if during one of those quarters we have made an acquisition, then the ratio shall not exceed 4.0 to 1.0 for the quarter in which the acquisition occurred and (1) if the acquisition is in the first half of the quarter, the next two quarters or (2) if the acquisition is in the second half of the quarter, the next three quarters; and | ||
| a ratio of consolidated EBITDDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated lease operating expense) of 4.0 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters. |
The Partnership was in compliance with all terms under its long-term debt as of June 30, 2011.
8. Fair Value
The Partnerships financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amount of the Partnerships financial
instruments included in accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their fair value due
to their short-term nature. The Partnerships cash and cash equivalents include money market
accounts and are considered a Level 1 measurement. The fair market value of the Partnerships
long-term debt was estimated to be $843.8 million and $596.1 million at June 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, respectively, for the senior notes. The carrying value of the Partnerships senior notes
was $824.8 million and $598.6 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The
fair value is estimated by management using comparable term risk-free treasury issues with a market
rate component determined by current financial instruments with similar characteristics which is a
Level 3 measurement. Since the Partnerships credit facility is variable rate debt, its fair value
approximates its carrying amount.
12
Table of Contents
9. Related Party Transactions
Reimbursements to Affiliates of our General Partner
The Partnerships general partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation
for its management of Natural Resource Partners L.P. However, in accordance with the partnership
agreement, the general partner and its affiliates are reimbursed for expenses incurred on the
Partnerships behalf. All direct general and administrative expenses are charged to the
Partnership as incurred. The Partnership also reimburses indirect general and administrative
costs, including certain legal, accounting, treasury, information technology, insurance,
administration of employee benefits and other corporate services incurred by our general partner
and its affiliates.
The reimbursements to affiliates of the Partnerships general partner for services performed
by Western Pocahontas Properties and Quintana Minerals Corporation are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Reimbursement for services |
$ | 2,091 | $ | 1,789 | $ | 4,153 | $ | 3,580 | ||||||||
The Partnership leases substantially all of two floors of an office building in Huntington,
West Virginia from Western Pocahontas Properties and pays $0.5 million in lease payments each year
through December 31, 2018.
Transactions with Cline Affiliates
Various companies controlled by Chris Cline lease coal reserves from the Partnership, and the
Partnership provides coal transportation services to them for a fee. At June 30, 2011, Mr. Cline,
both individually and through another affiliate, Adena Minerals, LLC, owns a 31% interest in the
Partnerships general partner, as well as 16,686,672 common units. Revenues from the Cline
affiliates are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
$ | 5,250 | $ | 7,475 | $ | 14,429 | $ | 12,782 | ||||||||
Coal processing fees |
492 | 313 | 1,193 | 441 | ||||||||||||
Transportation fees |
3,745 | 3,992 | 7,844 | 6,400 | ||||||||||||
Minimums recognized as revenue |
| 3,100 | | 6,200 | ||||||||||||
Override revenue |
228 | 277 | 679 | 719 | ||||||||||||
$ | 9,715 | $ | 15,157 | $ | 24,145 | $ | 26,542 | |||||||||
At June 30, 2011, the Partnership had accounts receivable totaling $3.1 million from Cline
affiliates, and had received $58.4 million in minimum royalty payments that have not been recouped
by Cline affiliates, of which $12.0 million was received in the current year.
Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd.
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. is a principal in Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd., which controls
several private equity funds focused on investments in the energy business. In connection with the
formation of Quintana Capital, the Partnership adopted a formal conflicts policy that establishes
the opportunities that will be pursued by the Partnership and those that will be pursued by
Quintana Capital. The governance documents of Quintana Capitals affiliated investment funds
reflect the guidelines set forth in NRPs conflicts policy.
A fund controlled by Quintana Capital owns a significant membership interest in Taggart Global
USA, LLC, including the right to nominate two members of Taggarts 5-person board of directors.
The Partnership owns and leases preparation plants to Taggart
13
Table of Contents
Global, which designs, builds and operates the plants. The lease payments are based on the
sales price for the coal that is processed through the facilities. The Partnership currently
leases four facilities to Taggart. Revenues from Taggart are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal processing revenues |
$ | 2,419 | $ | 1,811 | $ | 4,625 | $ | 2,534 | ||||||||
At June 30, 2011, the Partnership had accounts receivable totaling $1.4 million from Taggart.
A fund controlled by Quintana Capital owns Kopper-Glo, a small coal mining company that is one
of the Partnerships lessees with operations in Tennessee. Revenues from Kopper-Glo are as
follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
$ | 419 | $ | 379 | $ | 753 | $ | 832 | ||||||||
The Partnership also had accounts receivable totaling $0.2 million from Kopper-Glo at June 30,
2011.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
The Partnership is involved, from time to time, in various legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. While the ultimate results of these proceedings cannot be predicted
with certainty, Partnership management believes these claims will not have a material effect on the
Partnerships financial position, liquidity or operations.
Environmental Compliance
The operations conducted on the Partnerships properties by its lessees are subject to
environmental laws and regulations adopted by various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions
in which these operations are conducted. As owner of surface interests in some properties, the
Partnership may be liable for certain environmental conditions occurring at the surface properties.
The terms of substantially all of the Partnerships leases require the lessee to comply with all
applicable laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. Lessees post
reclamation bonds assuring that reclamation will be completed as required by the relevant permit,
and substantially all of the leases require the lessee to indemnify the Partnership against, among
other things, environmental liabilities. Some of these indemnifications survive the termination of
the lease. The Partnership has neither incurred, nor is aware of, any material environmental
charges imposed on it related to its properties as of June 30, 2011. The Partnership is not
associated with any environmental contamination that may require remediation costs.
Acquisition
In conjunction with a definitive agreement, as of June 30, 2011, the Partnership may be
obligated to purchase in excess of 100 million additional tons of coal reserves from Colt, LLC for
an aggregate purchase price of $80.0 million over the next year as certain milestones are completed
relating to construction of a new mine.
14
Table of Contents
11. Major Lessees
Revenues from lessees that exceeded ten percent of total revenues for the periods as presented
below:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | Percent | Revenues | Percent | Revenues | Percent | Revenues | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alpha Natural Resources |
$ | 29,701 | 32 | % | $ | 21,652 | 27 | % | $ | 54,292 | 31 | % | $ | 38,941 | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The Cline Group |
$ | 9,715 | 11 | % | $ | 15,157 | 19 | % | $ | 24,145 | 14 | % | $ | 26,542 | 19 | % |
In the first half of 2011, the Partnership derived over 45% of its total revenue from the two
companies listed above. As a result, the Partnership has a significant concentration of revenues
with those lessees, although in most cases, with the exception of the Williamson mine operated by
an affiliate of the Cline group, the exposure is spread out over a number of different mining
operations and leases. Clines Williamson mine alone was responsible for approximately 9% of our
total revenues for the first six months of 2011. As a result of the merger of Alpha Natural
Resources and Massey Energy Company, all prior period revenues from Massey have been combined with
those of Alpha for presentation purposes in this 10-Q.
12. Incentive Plans
GP Natural Resource Partners LLC adopted the Natural Resource Partners Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the Long-Term Incentive Plan) for directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC and
employees of its affiliates who perform services for the Partnership. The Compensation, Nominating
and Governance (CNG) Committee of GP Natural Resource Partners LLCs board of directors
administers the Long-Term Incentive Plan. Subject to the rules of the exchange upon which the
common units are listed at the time, the board of directors and the compensation committee of the
board of directors have the right to alter or amend the Long-Term Incentive Plan or any part of the
Long-Term Incentive Plan from time to time. Except upon the occurrence of unusual or nonrecurring
events, no change in any outstanding grant may be made that would materially reduce the benefit
intended to be made available to a participant without the consent of the participant.
Under the plan a grantee will receive the market value of a common unit in cash upon vesting.
Market value is defined as the average closing price over the last 20 trading days prior to the
vesting date. The CNG Committee may make grants under the Long-Term Incentive Plan to employees and
directors containing such terms as it determines, including the vesting period. Outstanding grants
vest upon a change in control of the Partnership, the general partner, or GP Natural Resource
Partners LLC. If a grantees employment or membership on the board of directors terminates for any
reason, outstanding grants will be automatically forfeited unless and to the extent the CNG
Committee provides otherwise.
A summary of activity in the outstanding grants during 2011 is as follows:
Outstanding grants at January 1, 2011 |
753,868 | |||
Grants during the year |
279,078 | |||
Grants vested and paid during the year |
(162,186 | ) | ||
Forfeitures during the year |
| |||
Outstanding grants at June 30, 2011 |
870,760 | |||
Grants typically vest at the end of a four-year period and are paid in cash upon vesting. The
liability fluctuates with the market value of the Partnership units and because of changes in
estimated fair value determined each quarter using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Risk
free interest rates and volatility are reset at each calculation based on current rates
corresponding to the remaining vesting term for each outstanding grant and ranged from 0.23% to
1.24% and 26.02% to 49.56%, respectively at June 30, 2011. The Partnerships historical
distribution rate of 6.73% and historical forfeiture rate of 2.85% were used in the calculation at
June 30, 2011. The Partnership recorded expenses related to its plan to be reimbursed to its
general partner of $1.1 million and $0.6 million and $5.5 million and $2.4 million for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In connection with the Long-Term
Incentive Plan, payments are typically made during the first half of the year. Payments of $5.7
million and $3.2 million were made during the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
15
Table of Contents
In connection with the phantom unit awards granted since February 2008, the CNG Committee also
granted tandem Distribution Equivalent Rights, or DERs, which entitle the holders to receive
distributions equal to the distributions paid on the Partnerships common units. The DERs are
payable in cash upon vesting but may be subject to forfeiture if the grantee ceases employment
prior to vesting.
The unaccrued cost, associated with the unvested outstanding grants and related DERs at June
30, 2011, was $17.6 million.
13. Equity Transactions, including Distributions
On May 13, 2011, the Partnership paid a quarterly distribution $0.54 per unit to all holders
of common units.
On September 20, 2010, the Partnership eliminated all of the incentive distribution rights
(IDRs) held by its general partner and affiliates of the general partner. As consideration for the
elimination of the IDRs, the Partnership issued 32 million common units to the holders of the IDRs.
There are now 106,027,836 common units outstanding and the general partner retained its 2%
interest in the Partnership.
14. Subsequent Events
The following represents material events that have occurred subsequent to June 30, 2011
through the time of the Partnerships filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission:
Distributions
On July 20, 2011, the Partnership declared a distribution of $0.54 per unit to be paid on
August 12, 2011 to unitholders of record on August 5, 2011.
Acquisition
Royal Oil and Gas. In July 2011, the Partnership acquired approximately 44,000 acres of coal
reserves and coal bed methane located in Pennsylvania and Illinois from Royal Oil and Gas
Corporation for $8.0 million.
16
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with the historical financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in
this filing and the financial statements and footnotes included in the Natural Resource Partners
L.P. Form 10-K, as filed on February 28, 2011.
Executive Overview
Our Business
We engage principally in the business of owning, managing and leasing mineral properties in
the United States. We own coal reserves in the three major U.S. coal-producing regions:
Appalachia, the Illinois Basin and the Western United States, as well as lignite reserves in the
Gulf Coast region. As of December 31, 2010, we owned or controlled approximately 2.3 billion tons
of proven and probable coal reserves, and we also owned approximately 228 million tons of aggregate
reserves in a number of states across the country. We do not operate any mines, but lease our
reserves to experienced mine operators under long-term leases that grant the operators the right to
mine and sell our reserves in exchange for royalty payments.
Our revenue and profitability are dependent on our lessees ability to mine and market our
reserves. Most of our coal is produced by large companies, many of which are publicly traded, with
experienced and professional sales departments. A significant portion of our coal is sold by our
lessees under coal supply contracts that have terms of one year or more. In contrast, our
aggregate properties are typically mined by regional operators with significant experience and
knowledge of the local markets. The aggregates are sold at current market prices, which
historically have increased along with the producer price index for sand and gravel. Over the long
term, both our coal and aggregate royalty revenues are affected by changes in the market for and
the market price of the commodities.
In our royalty business, our lessees generally make payments to us based on the greater of a
percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed royalty per ton of coal or aggregates they sell,
subject to minimum monthly, quarterly or annual payments. These minimum royalties are generally
recoupable over a specified period of time, which varies by lease, if sufficient royalties are
generated from production in those future periods. We do not recognize these minimum royalties as
revenue until the applicable recoupment period has expired or they are recouped through production.
Until recognized as revenue, these minimum royalties are recorded as deferred revenue, a liability
on our balance sheet.
In addition to coal and aggregate royalty revenues, we generated approximately 22% of our
first half 2011 revenues from other sources, as compared to 26% in the first half of 2010. Other
sources of revenue include: coal processing and transportation fees; overriding royalties; wheelage
payments; rentals; property tax revenue; and timber sales.
Our Current Liquidity Position
As of June 30, 2011, we had $300 million in available capacity under our credit facility and
approximately $146 million in cash. With our credit facility maturing in March 2012, we have
commenced discussions to amend and extend the term of the facility. In the second quarter of
2011, we issued $250 million of additional senior unsecured notes, and are committed to issue
another $50 million of senior notes in October of this year. We used most of the proceeds from the
senior notes to repay all of the outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, and
have used, or will use, the remaining proceeds for acquisitions. We believe that the combination
of our capacity under our credit facility, our cash on hand and the pending issuance of an
additional $50 million of senior notes gives us enough liquidity to meet our current capital needs.
In addition, other than a $35 million senior note that matures in 2013, we amortize our
long-term debt. Although our annual principal payments will increase significantly beginning in
2013, we have no need to access the capital markets to pay off or refinance any of our senior note
obligations other than the one note, and our outstanding principal will be reduced as the minerals
are depleted.
Current Results/Outlook for Second Half of 2011
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our lessees produced 26.4 million tons of coal and
aggregates, generating $138.2 million in royalty revenues from our properties, and our total
revenues were $176.3 million. Prices for metallurgical coal remained at high levels, resulting in
significantly improved results, especially from our Central Appalachian properties. During the
first half of the year, we benefitted from our substantial exposure to metallurgical coal. However,
the Oak Grove mine in Alabama suffered damage to its preparation plant due to a tornado, and is not
expected to sell any coal in the third quarter. The Pinnacle mine in West Virginia has
experienced a high level of carbon monoxide and remains closed until MSHA determines that the
mine is safe. Both of these mines
17
Table of Contents
are operated by Cliffs Natural Resources and we derived 13% of
our metallurgical coal revenues during the first half of 2011 from these mines. As a result, we
expect to receive a lower percentage of revenues from metallurgical coal sales in the second half
of the year. In the first six months of 2011, we derived approximately 47% of our coal royalty
revenues and 37% of the related production from metallurgical coal.
Even though coal royalty revenues from our Appalachian properties increased as a percentage of
our total revenues for the first half of 2011, this percentage has generally been declining as we
are diligently working to diversify our holdings by expanding our presence in the Illinois Basin
and through additional aggregates and other mineral acquisitions. Our expansion into Illinois is
through the acquisition of reserves by us and the development of greenfield mines by Cline. These
projects take several years to reach full production, and it is difficult for us to forecast the
timing of completion of the projects. To protect against this risk, we are receiving significant
minimum royalties with respect to each of the projects. Although minimums provide cash to us that
can be distributed to our limited partners, the minimums are generally not revenue to us until
recouped through production or at the end of the recoupment period. Thus, to the extent that the
development takes longer than anticipated to begin production, it will impact the revenues that we
receive in the future.
Operations at the Gatling, West Virginia mine were idled in April 2010 and had not been
restarted as of the end of the second quarter. Gatling LLC, the Cline affiliate that operates the
mine, has communicated to us that it is continuing to maintain the mine and is currently in
discussions with American Electric Power (AEP) regarding modifications to its existing coal sales
contract. Pursuant to its contractual obligations, Gatling continues to make its quarterly minimum
payments with respect to this mine and has also communicated that it will continue to do so for the
remainder of the lease term. The net book value of the assets relating to this operation was $129.6
million as of June 30, 2011. As of the date of this report, we have received $22.4 million in
minimum royalties, and contractual quarterly minimums for the remainder of the primary term total
$66.3 million. Considering all available information, we have completed an undiscounted cash flow
analysis of the assets relating to this operation and determined the undiscounted cash flows exceed
those assets carrying values. However, if the mine does not become operational in future periods
or discussions with AEP or other potential purchasers of the coal are not successful, the estimated
cash flows may change and we may determine that some of the assets associated with the mine have
suffered impairment. This decision and an associated impairment charge could have a material
adverse impact on our earnings in the period in which any impairment is recognized, but it would
not impact our cash flows from operations or our distributable cash flow.
Political, Legal and Regulatory Environment
The political, legal and regulatory environment continues to be difficult for the coal
industry. The Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, has used its authority to create
significant delays in the issuance of new permits and the modification of existing permits. The
continued uncertainty regarding the permitting of coal mines in Appalachia has led to substantial
delays and increased costs for coal operators.
In addition to the increased oversight of the EPA, the Mine Safety and Health Administration,
or MSHA, has increased its involvement in the approval of plans and enforcement of safety issues in
connection with mining. The 2010 mine disaster at Masseys Upper Big Branch Mine has led to even
more scrutiny by MSHA of our lessees operations, as well as additional mine safety legislation
being considered by Congress. MSHAs involvement has increased the cost of mining due to more
frequent citations and much higher fines imposed on our lessees as well as the overall cost of
regulatory compliance. Combined with the difficult economic environment and the higher costs of
mining in general, MSHAs recent increased participation in the mine development process could
significantly delay the opening of new mines.
The EPA is also using the existing Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases. In April 2007,
the U.S. Supreme Court rendered its decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, finding that the EPA has
authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles and can
decide against regulation only if the EPA determines that carbon dioxide does not significantly
contribute to climate change and does not endanger public health or the environment. In response
to Massachusetts v. EPA, the EPA published a final rule that requires the reporting of greenhouse
gas emissions from all sectors of the American economy, although reporting of emissions from
underground coal mines and coal suppliers as originally proposed has been deferred pending further
review. In December 2009, EPA determined that six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide and
methane, endanger the public health and welfare of current and future generations. In the same
rulemaking, EPA found that emission of greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and their engines
contribute to greenhouse gas pollution. Although Massachusetts v. EPA did not involve the EPAs
authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources, such as coal-fueled power
plants, the decision is likely to impact
regulation of stationary sources. Several petitioners have challenged the EPAs findings in
the Washington D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, and that litigation is ongoing.
18
Table of Contents
Distributable Cash Flow
Under our partnership agreement, we are required to distribute all of our available cash each
quarter. Because distributable cash flow is a significant liquidity metric that is an indicator of
our ability to generate cash flows at a level that can sustain or support an increase in quarterly
cash distributions paid to our partners, we view it as the most important measure of our success as
a company. Distributable cash flow is also the quantitative standard used in the investment
community with respect to publicly traded partnerships.
Our distributable cash flow represents cash flow from operations less actual principal
payments and cash reserves set aside for scheduled principal payments on our senior notes.
Although distributable cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure, we believe it is a useful
adjunct to net cash provided by operating activities under GAAP. Distributable cash flow is not a
measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash
flows from operating, investing or financing activities. Distributable cash flow may not be
calculated the same for NRP as for other companies. A reconciliation of distributable cash flow to
net cash provided by operating activities is set forth below.
Reconciliation
of GAAP Net cash provided by operating activities
to Non-GAAP Distributable cash flow
to Non-GAAP Distributable cash flow
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 91,646 | $ | 71,672 | $ | 138,680 | $ | 113,553 | ||||||||
Less scheduled principal payments |
(8,633 | ) | (9,350 | ) | (23,826 | ) | (24,542 | ) | ||||||||
Less reserves for future principal payments |
(7,700 | ) | (7,880 | ) | (15,759 | ) | (15,939 | ) | ||||||||
Add reserves used for scheduled principal payments |
8,633 | 9,350 | 23,826 | 24,542 | ||||||||||||
Distributable cash flow |
$ | 83,946 | $ | 63,792 | $ | 122,921 | $ | 97,614 | ||||||||
Recent Acquisitions
We are a growth-oriented company and have closed a number of acquisitions over the last
several years. Our most recent acquisitions are briefly described below.
Royal Oil and Gas. In July 2011, we acquired approximately 44,000 acres of coal reserves and
coal bed methane located in Pennsylvania and Illinois from Royal Oil and Gas Corporation for $8.0
million.
NBR Sand. In June 2011, we acquired an overriding royalty interest in approximately 711 acres
of frac sand reserves near Tyler, TX for $16.5 million.
East Tennessee Materials. In March 2011, we acquired approximately 500 acres of mineral and
surface rights related to limestone reserves in Cleveland, Tennessee near Chattanooga for $4.7
million.
CALX Resources. In February 2011, we acquired approximately 500 acres of mineral and surface
rights related to limestone reserves on the Tennessee River near Paducah, Kentucky for $16.0
million, of which $14.0 million was paid as of the date of this filing and the remaining $2.0
million will be paid as certain milestones are completed.
International Paper. In June 2010, we and International Paper Company created a venture, BRP
LLC, to own and manage mineral assets previously owned by International Paper. Some of these
assets are currently subject to leases, and certain other assets have not yet been developed but
are available for future development by the venture. In exchange for a $42.5 million contribution
we became the managing and controlling member with the right to designate two of the three managers
of BRP. NRP has a 51% income interest plus a preferential cumulative annual distribution prior to
profit sharing. In exchange for the contribution of the producing properties and the properties
not currently producing, International Paper received $42.5 million in cash from BRP, a minority
voting interest and a 49% income interest after the preferential cumulative annual distribution.
The amount of the preference is fixed throughout the life of the venture but can be reduced by a
portion of the proceeds received from sales of producing properties included in the initial
acquisition. Identified tangible assets in the transaction include oil and gas, coal and aggregate
reserves, as well the rights to coal bed
19
Table of Contents
methane, geothermal, CO2 sequestration, water rights, precious metals, industrial
minerals and base metals. Certain properties, including oil and gas, coal and aggregates, as well
as land leased for cell towers, are currently under lease and generating revenues.
Rockmart Slate. In June 2010, we acquired approximately 100 acres of mineral and surface
rights related to slate reserves in Rockmart, Georgia from a local operator for a purchase price of
$6.7 million.
Sierra Silica. In April 2010, we acquired the rights to silica reserves on a 1,000 acre
property in Northern California from Sierra Silica Resources LLC for $17.0 million.
North American Limestone. In April 2010, we signed an agreement to build and own for the
construction of a fine grind processing facility for high calcium carbonate limestone located in
Putnam County, Indiana. We lease the facility to a local operator. The total cost for the
facility was $6.5 million.
Northgate-Thayer. In March 2010, we acquired approximately 100 acres of mineral and surface
rights related to dolomite limestone reserves in White County, Indiana from a local operator for a
purchase price of $7.5 million.
Massey- Override. In March 2010, we acquired from Massey Energy (now Alpha Natural Resources)
subsidiaries overriding royalty interests in coal reserves located in southern West Virginia and
eastern Kentucky. Total consideration for this purchase was $3.0 million.
Colt. In September 2009, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire approximately 200
million tons of coal reserves related to the Deer Run Mine in Illinois from Colt, LLC, an affiliate
of the Cline Group, through several separate transactions for a total purchase price of $255
million. As of the date of this filing, we had acquired approximately 92.1 million tons of
reserves for approximately $175 million. Future closings anticipated through 2012 will be
associated with completion of certain milestones related to the new mines construction.
20
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Increase | Percentage | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | (Decrease) | Change | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percent and per ton data) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal: |
||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
$ | 5,180 | $ | 4,924 | $ | 256 | 5 | % | ||||||||
Central |
55,119 | 38,526 | 16,593 | 43 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
3,447 | 6,074 | (2,627 | ) | (43 | )% | ||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
63,746 | 49,524 | 14,222 | 29 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
4,771 | 6,819 | (2,048 | ) | (30 | )% | ||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
1,120 | 1,489 | (369 | ) | (25 | )% | ||||||||||
Gulf Coast |
151 | | 151 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 69,788 | $ | 57,832 | $ | 11,956 | 21 | % | ||||||||
Production (tons) |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
1,199 | 1,251 | (52 | ) | (4 | )% | ||||||||||
Central |
8,023 | 6,971 | 1,052 | 15 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
472 | 833 | (361 | ) | (43 | )% | ||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
9,694 | 9,055 | 639 | 7 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
1,268 | 1,751 | (483 | ) | (28 | )% | ||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
425 | 961 | (536 | ) | (56 | )% | ||||||||||
Gulf Coast |
151 | | 151 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
11,538 | 11,767 | (229 | ) | (2 | )% | ||||||||||
Average gross royalty per ton |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
$ | 4.32 | $ | 3.94 | $ | 0.38 | 10 | % | ||||||||
Central |
6.87 | 5.53 | 1.34 | 24 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
7.30 | 7.29 | 0.01 | | ||||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
6.58 | 5.47 | 1.11 | 20 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
3.76 | 3.89 | (0.13 | ) | (3 | )% | ||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
2.64 | 1.55 | 1.09 | 70 | % | |||||||||||
Gulf Coast |
1.00 | | 1.00 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Combined average gross royalty per ton |
$ | 6.05 | $ | 4.91 | $ | 1.14 | 23 | % | ||||||||
Aggregates: |
||||||||||||||||
Royalty revenue |
$ | 1,737 | $ | 1,064 | $ | 673 | 63 | % | ||||||||
Aggregate royalty bonus |
$ | 94 | $ | (714 | ) | $ | 808 | |||||||||
Production |
1,671 | 778 | 893 | 115 | % | |||||||||||
Average base royalty per ton |
$ | 1.04 | $ | 1.37 | $ | (0.33 | ) | (24 | )% |
Coal Royalty Revenues and Production. Coal royalty revenues comprised approximately 76% and
73% of our total revenue for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The following is a discussion of the coal royalty revenues and production derived
from our major coal producing regions:
Appalachia. Primarily due to higher metallurgical coal prices being realized by our lessees,
coal royalty revenues increased in the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same
period of 2010. Production in the Central Appalachian region increased due to some mines operating
for the entire quarter due to the completion of reconstruction of an associated preparation plant
in late 2010, and some lessees having a higher proportion of their production on our properties.
These production increases were in part offset in the Southern Appalachian region due to the
temporary idling of the Oak Grove mine due to damage to a preparation plant caused by a tornado in
late April 2011.
21
Table of Contents
Illinois Basin. Production decreased due to reduced shipments from the Williamson property
for the three months ended June 30, 2011 versus the three months ended June 30, 2010, caused
primarily by the flooding on the Mississippi River. Our Macoupin property had increased sales as
the mine continues to increase its production.
Northern Powder River Basin. Although coal royalty revenues increased on our Western Energy
property, production decreased due to the normal variations that occur due to the checkerboard
nature of ownership. The reduced production was partially offset by higher sales price realized by
the lessee.
Aggregates Royalty Revenues and Production. Aggregate production and revenue both increased
for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the volumes generated from acquisitions
completed during 2010 and 2011, particularly the BRP properties. The revenue per ton decreased due
to lower revenue per ton generated from some of the acquired leases.
22
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Increase | Percentage | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | (Decrease) | Change | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percent and per ton data) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal: |
||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
$ | 9,861 | $ | 9,340 | $ | 521 | 6 | % | ||||||||
Central |
100,561 | 70,334 | 30,227 | 43 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
8,188 | 10,275 | (2,087 | ) | (20 | )% | ||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
118,610 | 89,949 | 28,661 | 32 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
13,831 | 11,029 | 2,802 | 25 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
2,513 | 4,015 | (1,502 | ) | (37 | )% | ||||||||||
Gulf Coast |
199 | | 199 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 135,153 | $ | 104,993 | $ | 30,160 | 29 | % | ||||||||
Production (tons) |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
2,374 | 2,498 | (124 | ) | (5 | )% | ||||||||||
Central |
15,350 | 13,367 | 1,983 | 15 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
1,120 | 1,534 | (414 | ) | (27 | )% | ||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
18,844 | 17,399 | 1,445 | 8 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
3,544 | 2,898 | 646 | 22 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
905 | 2,272 | (1,367 | ) | (60 | )% | ||||||||||
Gulf Coast |
191 | | 191 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
23,484 | 22,569 | 915 | 4 | % | |||||||||||
Average gross royalty per ton |
||||||||||||||||
Appalachia |
||||||||||||||||
Northern |
$ | 4.15 | $ | 3.74 | $ | 0.41 | 11 | % | ||||||||
Central |
6.55 | 5.26 | 1.29 | 25 | % | |||||||||||
Southern |
7.31 | 6.70 | 0.61 | 9 | % | |||||||||||
Total Appalachia |
6.29 | 5.17 | 1.12 | 22 | % | |||||||||||
Illinois Basin |
3.90 | 3.81 | 0.09 | 2 | % | |||||||||||
Northern Powder River Basin |
2.78 | 1.77 | 1.01 | 57 | % | |||||||||||
Gulf Coast |
1.04 | | 1.04 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Combined average gross royalty per ton |
$ | 5.76 | $ | 4.65 | $ | 1.11 | 24 | % | ||||||||
Aggregates: |
||||||||||||||||
Royalty revenue |
$ | 2,931 | $ | 1,880 | $ | 1,051 | 56 | % | ||||||||
Aggregate royalty bonus |
$ | 94 | $ | (639 | ) | $ | 733 | |||||||||
Production |
2,936 | 1,383 | 1,553 | 112 | % | |||||||||||
Average base royalty per ton |
$ | 1.00 | $ | 1.36 | $ | (0.36 | ) | (26 | )% |
Coal Royalty Revenues and Production. Coal royalty revenues comprised approximately 77% and
73% of our total revenue for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The following is a discussion of the coal royalty revenues and production derived
from our major coal producing regions:
Appalachia. Primarily due to higher metallurgical coal prices being realized by our lessees,
coal royalty revenues increased in the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same
period of 2010. Production in the Central Appalachian region increased due to some mines operating
for the entire first half due to the completion of reconstruction of an associated preparation
plant completed late in 2010, and some lessees having a higher proportion of their production on
our properties. These production increases were in part offset in the Southern Appalachian region
due to the temporary idling of the Oak Grove mine due to damage to a preparation plant caused by a
tornado in late April 2011, and some production moving off our property during the quarter.
Illinois Basin. Production increased due to improved shipments from the Macoupin property for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 versus the same period in 2010, as the mine continues to
increase its production. The increased shipments from Macoupin offset lower production and sales
at the Williamson mine caused by the flooding on the Mississippi River.
23
Table of Contents
Northern Powder River Basin. Coal royalty revenues and production decreased on our Western
Energy property. Production decreased due to the normal variations that occur due to the
checkerboard nature of ownership, but was partially offset by higher sales price realized by the
lessee.
Aggregates Royalty Revenues and Production. Aggregate production and revenue both increased
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the volumes generated from acquisitions
completed during 2010 and early 2011, particularly the BRP properties. The revenue per ton
decreased due to lower revenue per ton generated from some of the acquired leases.
Other Operating Results
In addition to coal and aggregate royalty revenues, we generated approximately 22% of our
first half 2011 revenues from other sources, as compared to 26% for the same period of 2010. The
most significant decrease in these other sources of revenue occurred due to a substantial minimum
royalty paid by Cline with respect to the Colt reserves that was not recoupable in 2010 but became recoupable beginning in 2011. In addition, we received an oil and gas lease bonus as well
as oil and gas revenues related to our BRP venture with International Paper. Other sources of
revenue include: coal processing and transportation fees; overriding royalties; wheelage payments;
rentals; property tax revenue; and timber sales.
Coal Processing and Transportation Revenues. We generated $3.2 million and $2.7 million in
processing revenues for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $6.3 million
and $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We do not operate
the preparation plants, but receive a fee for coal processed through them. Similar to our coal
royalty structure, the throughput fees are based on a percentage of the ultimate sales price for
the coal that is processed through the facilities and the higher coal prices resulted in improved
revenues for these facilities.
In addition to our preparation plants, we own coal handling and transportation infrastructure
in West Virginia, Ohio and Illinois. In contrast to our typical royalty structure, we receive a
fixed rate per ton for coal transported over these facilities. For the assets other than our
loadout facility at the Shay No. 1 mine in Illinois, we operate coal handling and transportation
infrastructure and have subcontracted out that responsibility to third parties. We generated
transportation fees from these assets of approximately $3.7 million and $4.0 million for the
quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $7.8 million and $6.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Operating costs and expenses. Included in total expenses are:
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization of $16.2 million and $16.5 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and $30.5 million and $27.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Depletion and amortization increased approximately $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and is primarily due to increased oil and gas depletion on our BRP properties. | ||
| General and administrative expenses were $6.4 million and $6.8 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and $16.6 million and $13.3 million the six month periods ending June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $3.3 million compared to the same period in 2010, primarily due to higher accruals under our long-term incentive plan attributable to increases in our unit price, as well as increased expenses for additional employees. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased approximately $2 million for both the quarter
ending June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This
increase reflects the issuance of new senior notes at higher interest rates than our credit
facility.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows and Capital Expenditures
We satisfy our working capital requirements with cash generated from operations. Since our
initial public offering, we have financed our property acquisitions with available cash, borrowings
under our revolving credit facility, and the issuance of our senior notes and additional units.
While our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and pay distributions to our unitholders
depends in
large part on our future operating performance, our ability to make acquisitions will depend
on prevailing economic conditions in the financial markets as well as the coal and aggregate
industries and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. Our capital expenditures,
other than for acquisitions, have historically been minimal.
24
Table of Contents
Our credit facility matures in March 2012, and we have commenced discussions to amend and
extend the facility. Our credit ratios are within our debt covenants for both our credit facility
and our outstanding senior notes. In addition, we are amortizing substantially all of our senior
notes and have no immediate need to refinance. For a more complete discussion of factors that will
affect our liquidity, please read Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010. As of June 30, 2011, we had the full $300 million in available capacity under
our credit facility. As of June 30, 2011, we also had approximately $145.7 million of cash.
Net cash provided by operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $138.7
million and $113.6 million, respectively. The most significant portion of our cash provided by
operations is generated from coal royalty revenues.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $98.6
million and $112.5 million, respectively. Substantially all of our investing activities consisted
of acquiring coal reserves, plant and equipment and other mineral rights.
Net cash flows provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was
$10.1 million. During the first six months of 2011, we had proceeds from loans of $335.0 million
offset by repayment of debt of $202.8 million, retirement of obligations related to acquisitions of
$4.0 million and distributions paid of $116.8 million. During the same period for 2010, net cash
used in financing activities was $5.3 million, which included proceeds from loans of $81.0 million
offset by debt repayments of $98.5 million, proceeds from issuance of units was $110.4 million,
retirement of obligations related to acquisitions of $3.0 million and $97.4 million for
distributions to partners.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Credit Facility. We have a $300 million revolving credit facility, and as of the date of this
report we had the full amount available to us under the facility. Under an accordion feature in
the credit facility, we may request our lenders to increase their aggregate commitment to a maximum
of $450 million on the same terms. However, we cannot be certain that our lenders will elect to
participate in the accordion feature. To the extent the lenders decline to participate, we may
elect to bring new lenders into the facility, but cannot make any assurance that the additional
credit capacity will be available to us on existing or comparable terms.
During 2011, our borrowings and repayments under our credit facility were as follows:
Quarters Ending | ||||||||
March 31, | June 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Outstanding balance, beginning of period |
$ | 94,000 | $ | 179,000 | ||||
Borrowings under credit facility |
85,000 | | ||||||
Less: Repayments under credit facility |
| 179,000 | ||||||
Outstanding balance, ending period |
$ | 179,000 | $ | | ||||
Our obligations under the credit facility are unsecured but are guaranteed by our operating
subsidiaries. We may prepay all loans at any time without penalty. Indebtedness under the
revolving credit facility bears interest, at our option, at either:
| the higher of the federal funds rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0% to 0.50% or the prime rate as announced by the agent bank; or | ||
| at a rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.45% to 1.50%. |
We incur a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at a rate
ranging from 0.10% to 0.30% per annum.
The credit agreement contains covenants requiring us to maintain:
| a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of 3.75 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters; provided however, if during one of those quarters we have made an acquisition, then the ratio shall not exceed 4.0 to 1.0 for the quarter in which the acquisition occurred and (1) if the acquisition is in the first half of the quarter, the next two quarters or (2) if the acquisition is in the second half of the quarter, the next three quarters; and |
25
Table of Contents
| a ratio of consolidated EBITDDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated lease operating expense) of 4.0 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters. |
Senior Notes. NRP Operating LLC issued the senior notes listed below under a note purchase
agreement as supplemented from time to time. The senior notes are unsecured but are guaranteed by
our operating subsidiaries. We may prepay the senior notes at any time together with a make-whole
amount (as defined in the note purchase agreement). If any event of default exists under the note
purchase agreement, the noteholders will be able to accelerate the maturity of the senior notes and
exercise other rights and remedies.
The senior note purchase agreement contains covenants requiring our operating subsidiary to:
| Maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the note purchase agreement) of no more than 4.0 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters; | ||
| not permit debt secured by certain liens and debt of subsidiaries to exceed 10% of consolidated net tangible assets (as defined in the note purchase agreement); and | ||
| maintain the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated operating lease expense) at not less than 3.5 to 1.0. |
In the second quarter of 2011, we issued $250 million of additional senior unsecured notes and
are committed to issue another $50 million of senior unsecured notes in October 2011. Proceeds
from the senior notes were used to repay all of the outstanding balance under the revolving credit
facility, and we have used, or will use, the remaining proceeds for acquisitions.
A summary of the four tranches of senior notes is as follows:
Series | Amount | Interest Rate | Issue Date | Maturity | ||||||||||||
H |
$75 million | 4.73 | % | April 20, 2011 | December 1, 2023 | |||||||||||
I |
$125 million | 5.03 | % | April 20, 2011 | December 1, 2026 | |||||||||||
J |
$50 million | 5.03 | % | June 15, 2011 | December 1, 2026 | |||||||||||
K |
$50 million | 5.18 | % | October 3, 2011 | December 1, 2026 |
All tranches have semi-annual interest payments beginning December 1, 2011, and equal annual
principal payments beginning December 1, 2014.
Long-Term Debt
As of the date of this filing, our debt consisted of:
| $35.0 million of 5.55% senior notes due 2013; | ||
| $32.3 million of 4.91% senior notes due 2018; | ||
| $150.0 million of 8.38% senior notes due 2019; | ||
| $76.9 million of 5.05% senior notes due 2020; | ||
| $1.9 million of 5.31% utility local improvement obligation due 2021; | ||
| $33.6 million of 5.55% senior notes due 2023; | ||
| $75.0 million of 4.73% senior notes due 2023; | ||
| $195.0 million of 5.82% senior notes due 2024; | ||
| $50.0 million of 8.92% senior notes due 2024; and | ||
| $175.0 million of 5.03% senior notes due 2026. |
Other than the 5.55% senior notes due 2013, which have only semi-annual interest payments, all
of our senior notes require annual principal payments in addition to semi-annual interest payments.
The scheduled principal payments on the 8.38% senior notes due 2019 do not begin until March 2013,
the scheduled principal payments on the 8.92% senior notes due 2024 do not begin until March
2014, and the scheduled principal payments on the 4.73% and 5.03% senior notes do not begin
until December 2014. We also make annual principal and interest payments on the utility local
improvement obligation.
26
Table of Contents
Shelf Registration Statement
In addition to our credit facility, we maintain an automatically effective shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 with the SEC that is available for registered offerings of common units and
debt securities. The amounts, prices and timing of the issuance and sale of any equity or debt
securities will depend on market conditions, our capital requirements and compliance with our
credit facility and senior notes.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or related
parties and accordingly, there are no off-balance sheet risks to our liquidity and capital
resources from unconsolidated entities.
Related Party Transactions
Reimbursements to our General Partner
Our general partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation for its
management of Natural Resource Partners L.P. However, in accordance with our partnership agreement,
we reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for expenses incurred on our behalf. All
direct general and administrative expenses are charged to us as incurred. We also reimburse
indirect general and administrative costs, including certain legal, accounting, treasury,
information technology, insurance, administration of employee benefits and other corporate services
incurred by our general partner and its affiliates. Cost reimbursements due our general partner
may be substantial and will reduce our cash available for distribution to unitholders. The
reimbursements to our general partner for services performed by Western Pocahontas Properties and
Quintana Minerals Corporation are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Reimbursement for services |
$ | 2,091 | $ | 1,789 | $ | 4,153 | $ | 3,580 | ||||||||
For additional information, please read Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence Omnibus Agreement in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
We lease substantially all of two floors of an office building in Huntington, West Virginia
from Western Pocahontas at market rates. The terms of the lease were approved by our Conflicts
Committee. We pay $0.5 million each year in lease payments.
Transactions with Cline Affiliates
Various companies controlled by Chris Cline lease coal reserves from NRP, and we provide coal
transportation services to them for a fee. Mr. Cline, both individually and through another
affiliate, Adena Minerals, LLC, owns a 31% interest in NRPs general partner, as well as 16,686,672
common units. Revenues from Cline affiliates are as follows:
Three Months End | Six Months End | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenues |
$ | 5,250 | $ | 7,475 | $ | 14,429 | $ | 12,782 | ||||||||
Coal processing fees |
492 | 313 | 1,193 | 441 | ||||||||||||
Transportation fees |
3,745 | 3,992 | 7,844 | 6,400 | ||||||||||||
Minimums recognized as revenue |
| 3,100 | | 6,200 | ||||||||||||
Override revenue |
228 | 277 | 679 | 719 | ||||||||||||
$ | 9,715 | $ | 15,157 | $ | 24,145 | $ | 26,542 | |||||||||
27
Table of Contents
At June 30, 2011, we had accounts receivable totaling $3.1 million from Cline affiliates. As
of June 30, 2011, we have received $58.4 million in minimum royalty payments to date that have not
been recouped by Cline affiliates, of which $12.0 million was received in the current year.
Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd.
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. is a principal in Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd., which controls
several private equity funds focused on investments in the energy business. In connection with the
formation of Quintana Capital, we adopted a formal conflicts policy that establishes the
opportunities that will be pursued by NRP and those that will be pursued by Quintana Capital. The
governance documents of Quintana Capitals affiliated investment funds reflect the guidelines set
forth in NRPs conflicts policy.
A fund controlled by Quintana Capital owns a significant membership interest in Taggart Global
USA, LLC, including the right to nominate two members of Taggarts 5-person board of directors. We
own and lease preparation plants to Taggart Global, which designed, built and operates the plants.
The lease payments are based on the sales price for the coal that is processed through the
facilities. We currently lease four facilities to Taggart. Revenues from Taggart are as follows:
Three Months End | Six Months End | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal processing revenue |
$ | 2,419 | $ | 1,811 | $ | 4,625 | $ | 2,534 | ||||||||
At June 30, 2011, we had accounts receivable totaling $1.4 million from Taggart.
In June 2007, a fund controlled by Quintana Capital acquired Kopper-Glo, a small coal mining
company that is one of our lessees with operations in Tennessee. Revenues from Kopper-Glo are as
follows:
Three Months End | Six Months End | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Coal royalty revenue |
$ | 419 | $ | 379 | $ | 753 | $ | 832 | ||||||||
We also had accounts receivable totaling $0.2 million from Kopper-Glo at June 30, 2011.
Environmental
The operations our lessees conduct on our properties are subject to environmental laws and
regulations adopted by various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which these
operations are conducted. As an owner of surface interests in some properties, we may be liable
for certain environmental conditions occurring at the surface properties. The terms of
substantially all of our leases require the lessee to comply with all applicable laws and
regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. Lessees post reclamation bonds assuring
that reclamation will be completed as required by the relevant permit, and substantially all of the
leases require the lessee to indemnify us against, among other things, environmental liabilities.
Some of these indemnifications survive the termination of the lease. Because we have no employees,
employees of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership make regular visits to the mines to
ensure compliance with lease terms, but the duty to comply with all regulations rests with the
lessees. We believe that our lessees will be able to comply with existing regulations and do not
expect any lessees failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations to have a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We have neither incurred, nor are
aware of, any material environmental charges imposed on us related to our properties as of June 30,
2011. We are not associated with any environmental contamination that may require remediation
costs. However, our lessees regularly conduct reclamation work on the properties under lease to
them. Because we are not the permittee of the operations on our properties, we are not responsible
for the costs associated with these operations. In addition, West Virginia has established a fund
to satisfy any shortfall in our lessees reclamation obligations.
28
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk, which includes adverse changes in commodity prices and interest
rates as discussed below:
Commodity Price Risk
We are dependent upon the effective marketing and efficient mining of our coal reserves by our
lessees. Our lessees sell coal under various long-term and short-term contracts as well as on the
spot market. A large portion of these sales are under long-term contracts. A substantial or
extended decline in coal prices could materially and adversely affect us in two ways. First, lower
prices may reduce the quantity of coal that may be economically produced from our properties.
This, in turn, could reduce our coal royalty revenues and the value of our coal reserves. Second,
even if production is not reduced, the royalties we receive on each ton of coal sold may be
reduced. Additionally, volatility in coal prices could make it difficult to estimate with
precision the value of our coal reserves and any coal reserves that we may consider for
acquisition.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, which are subject to variable interest rates based upon LIBOR. At June 30, 2011,
we did not have any variable interest rate debt.
29
Table of Contents
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
NRP carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed
under the supervision and with the participation of NRP management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of NRP. Based
upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that (a) the
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and (b) such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal
quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
30
Table of Contents
Part II. Other Information
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
We are involved, from time to time, in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of business. While the ultimate results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with
certainty, our management believes these claims will not have a material effect on our financial
position, liquidity or operations.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
During the period covered by this report, there were no material changes from the risk factors
previously disclosed in Natural Resource Partners L.P.s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved)
Item 5.
Other Information
None.
31
Table of Contents
Item 6.
Exhibits
4.1
|
| Form of Series J Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011). | ||
31.1*
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley. | ||
31.2*
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley. | ||
32.1*
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. | ||
32.2*
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. | ||
101*
|
| The following financial information from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Natural Resource Partners L.P. for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): | ||
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
* | Submitted herewith. |
32
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned and thereunto duly authorized.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P. | ||||
By: | NRP (GP) LP, its general partner | |||
By: | GP NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LLC, its general partner | |||
Date: August 5, 2011 | By: | /s/ Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. | ||
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Date: August 5, 2011 | By: | /s/ Dwight L. Dunlap | ||
Dwight L. Dunlap, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
Date: August 5, 2011 | By: | /s/ Kenneth Hudson | ||
Kenneth Hudson Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
||||
33