NL INDUSTRIES INC - Quarter Report: 2012 March (Form 10-Q)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

Commission file number 1-640

NL INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New Jersey

13-5267260

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1700

Dallas, Texas 75240-2697

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (972) 233-1700

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding on April 30, 2012: 48,662,884.

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX


		Page
		number
Part I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2011; March 31, 2012 (unaudited)		3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)—Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012		5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited)—Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012		6

	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)—Three months ended March 31, 2012		7

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)—Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012		8

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		10

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		24

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk		40

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		40

Part II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		42

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		42

Item 6.	Exhibits		42

Items 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Part II are omitted because there is no information to report

- 2 -

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012
			(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,652	$	4,963
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		3,337		3,499
Accounts and other receivables, net		15,160		16,502
Inventories, net		19,578		19,661
Prepaid expenses and other		1,364		1,987
Deferred income taxes		7,213		7,213

Total current assets		58,304		53,825

Other assets:
Marketable securities		311,419		273,812
Investment in Kronos Worldwide, Inc.		281,257		320,939
Goodwill		47,553		47,747
Assets held for sale		6,649		6,649
Other assets, net		4,258		4,179

Total other assets		651,136		653,326

Property and equipment:
Land		11,639		11,783
Buildings		27,301		27,588
Equipment		129,685		130,209
Construction in progress		1,477		1,350

		170,102		170,930
Less accumulated depreciation		118,300		119,161

Net property and equipment		51,802		51,769

Total assets	$	761,242	$	758,920

- 3 -

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)

(In thousands)


	December 31, 2011			March 31, 2012
				(unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	10,000		$	16,500
Accounts payable		8,184			7,168
Accrued and other current liabilities		13,994			11,382
Accrued environmental remediation and related costs		7,301			8,558
Income taxes		1,327			448

Total current liabilities		40,806			44,056

Non-current liabilities:
Long-term debt		27,285			22,233
Accrued pension costs		16,743			15,364
Accrued postretirement benefit (OPEB) costs		4,373			4,268
Accrued environmental remediation and related costs		34,336			45,195
Deferred income taxes		192,492			188,970
Other		19,215			19,193

Total non-current liabilities		294,444			295,223

Equity:
NL Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		6,082			6,082
Additional paid-in capital		300,067			300,067
Retained earnings		113,555			128,521
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(4,724	)		(26,150	)

Total NL stockholders’ equity		414,980			408,520

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary		11,012			11,121

Total equity		425,992			419,641

Total liabilities and equity	$	761,242		$	758,920

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 11 and 12)

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 4 -

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2012
	(unaudited)
Net sales	$	34,777		$	35,531
Cost of sales		26,097			26,057

Gross margin		8,680			9,474
Selling, general and administrative expense		6,156			6,565
Other operating income (expense):
Insurance recoveries		359			1,125
Litigation settlement gain		7,468			—
Litigation expense		(227	)		—
Facility consolidation expense		(1,006	)		—
Corporate expense and other, net		(3,400	)		(16,167	)

Income (loss) from operations		5,718			(12,133	)

Equity in earnings of Kronos Worldwide, Inc.		18,329			41,612
Other income (expense):
Interest and dividends		596			715
Interest expense		(489	)		(324	)

Income before income taxes		24,154			29,870
Provision for income taxes		6,469			8,623

Net income		17,685			21,247

Noncontrolling interest in net income of subsidiary		518			198

Net income attributable to NL stockholders	$	17,167		$	21,049

Amounts attributable to NL stockholders:

Basic and diluted net income per share	$	.35		$	.43

Cash dividend per share	$	.125		$	.125

Weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of net income per share		48,648			48,663

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 5 -

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2012
	Unaudited
Net income	$	17,685		$	21,247

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Currency translation adjustment		2,676			4,137
Marketable securities adjustment		15,395			(25,875	)
Pension plans		460			565
OPEB plan		(146	)		(138	)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		18,385			(21,311	)

Comprehensive income (loss)		36,070			(64	)

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(560	)		(313	)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to NL stockholders	$	35,510		$	(377	)

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 6 -

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Three months ended March 31, 2012

(In thousands)


	NL Stockholders’ Equity
	Common stock		Additional paid-in capital		Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary			Total equity
								(unaudited)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	6,082	$	300,067	$	113,555		$	(4,724	)	$	11,012		$	425,992
Net income		—		—		21,049			—			198			21,247
Other comprehensive income (loss), net		—		—		—			(21,426	)		115			(21,311	)
Dividends		—		—		(6,083	)		—			(204	)		(6,287	)

Balance at March 31, 2012	$	6,082	$	300,067	$	128,521		$	(26,150	)	$	11,121		$	419,641

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 7 -

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2012
	(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	17,685		$	21,247
Depreciation and amortization		1,760			1,445
Deferred income taxes		4,837			8,218
Equity in Kronos Worldwide, Inc.		(18,329	)		(41,612	)
Distributions from Kronos Worldwide, Inc.		22,012			5,283
Benefit plan expense greater (less) than cash funding:
Defined benefit pension plans		(71	)		45
Other postretirement benefits		(141	)		(160	)
Other, net		150			70
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts and other receivables, net		(1,411	)		(999	)
Inventories, net		(992	)		(9	)
Prepaid expenses and other		(1,214	)		(278	)
Accrued environmental remediation and related costs		(588	)		12,116
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(8,034	)		(4,255	)
Income taxes		834			(1,264	)
Accounts with affiliates		1,245			369
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities, net		(393	)		(1,293	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		17,350			(1,077	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(605	)		(656	)
Change in restricted cash equivalents		1,997			(162	)
Proceeds from the sale of:
Marketable securities		116			—
Fixed assets		—			9
Purchase of marketable securities		(104	)		—

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		1,404			(809	)

- 8 -

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

(In thousands)


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2012
	(unaudited)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash dividends paid	$	(6,082	)	$	(6,083	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in subsidiary		(203	)		(204	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		342			—
Indebtedness:
Borrowings		3,600			8,200
Repayments		(22,150	)		(6,800	)
Deferred financing costs		—			(27	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(24,493	)		(4,914	)

Cash and cash equivalents—net change from:
Operating, investing and financing activities		(5,739	)		(6,800	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(28	)		111
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		15,461			11,652

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	9,694		$	4,963

Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid (received) for:
Interest	$	1,349		$	218
Income taxes, net		(521	)		1,301
Non-cash investing activity:
Accrual for capital expenditures		133			311

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 9 -

NL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

Note 1—Organization and basis of presentation:

Organization—At March 31, 2012, (i) Valhi, Inc. (NYSE: VHI) held approximately 83% of our outstanding common stock and (ii) Contran Corporation and its subsidiaries held an aggregate of approximately 95% of Valhi’s outstanding common stock. Substantially all of Contran’s outstanding voting stock is held by trusts established for the benefit of certain children and grandchildren of Harold C. Simmons (for which Mr. Simmons is the sole trustee), or is held by Mr. Simmons or other persons or companies related to Mr. Simmons. Consequently, Mr. Simmons may be deemed to control Contran, Valhi and us.

Basis of presentation—Consolidated in this Quarterly Report are the results of our majority-owned subsidiary, CompX International Inc. We also own 30% of Kronos Worldwide, Inc. CompX (NYSE Amex: CIX) and Kronos (NYSE: KRO) each file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report have been prepared on the same basis as the audited Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 that we filed with the SEC on March 5, 2012 (the 2011 Annual Report). In our opinion, we have made all necessary adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) in order to state fairly, in all material respects, our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods presented. We have condensed the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Stockholders’ Equity at December 31, 2011 contained in this Quarterly Report as compared to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements at that date, and we have omitted certain information and footnote disclosures (including those related to the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2011) normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Our results of operations for the interim period ended March 31, 2012 may not be indicative of our operating results for the full year. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report should be read in conjunction with our 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our 2011 Annual Report.

Unless otherwise indicated, references in this report to “NL,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to NL Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliate, Kronos, taken as a whole.

- 10 -

Note 2—Accounts and other receivables, net:


	December 31, 2011			March 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Trade receivables	$	14,705		$	15,951
Accrued insurance recoveries		586			500
Affiliate receivable		214			—
Other receivables		48			37
Refundable income taxes		8			364
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(401	)		(350	)

Total	$	15,160		$	16,502

Accrued insurance recoveries are discussed in Note 12.

Note 3—Inventories, net:


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Raw materials	$	6,757	$	6,792
Work in process		7,437		7,561
Finished products		5,384		5,308

Total	$	19,578	$	19,661

Note 4—Marketable securities:


	Fair value measurement level	Market value		Cost basis		Unrealized gains
		(in thousands)
December 31, 2011:
Noncurrent assets (available-for-sale):
Valhi common stock	1	$	289,711	$	24,347	$	265,364
TIMET common stock	1		21,708		7,351		14,357

Total		$	311,419	$	31,698	$	279,721

March 31, 2012:
Noncurrent assets (available-for-sale):
Valhi common stock	1	$	254,162	$	24,347	$	229,815
TIMET common stock	1		19,650		7,351		12,299

Total		$	273,812	$	31,698	$	242,114

Our marketable securities include investments in the publicly-traded shares of related parties: Valhi and Titanium Metals Corporation (TIMET). Contran, Mr. Harold Simmons and persons and other entities related to Mr. Simmons own a majority of Valhi’s and TIMET’s outstanding common stock. We account for our investments in Valhi and TIMET common stocks as available-for-sale marketable equity securities and any unrealized gains or losses on the securities are recognized through other comprehensive income. All of our marketable securities at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 were carried at fair value based on quoted market prices, representing a Level 1 input within the fair value hierarchy.

- 11 -

At December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, we held approximately 4.8 million shares of Valhi’s common stock and 1.4 million shares of TIMET common stock. At March 31, 2012, the quoted market price of Valhi’s and TIMET’s common stock was $53.05 and $13.56 per share, respectively. At December 31, 2011, such quoted market prices were $60.47 and $14.98 per share, respectively.

The Valhi and TIMET common stock we own is subject to the restrictions on resale pursuant to certain provisions of the SEC Rule 144. In addition, as a majority-owned subsidiary of Valhi we cannot vote our shares of Valhi common stock under Delaware Corporation Law, but we do receive dividends from Valhi on these shares, when declared and paid.

In March 2012, Valhi announced a 3-for-1 split of its common stock. The distribution of the additional Valhi shares is subject to certain customary regulatory approvals, and is expected to occur on the close of business on May 10, 2012. Valhi’s stock split will have no financial statement impact to us, and our ownership interest in Valhi will not change as a result of the split.

Note 5—Investment in Kronos Worldwide, Inc.:

At December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, we owned approximately 35.2 million shares of Kronos common stock. At March 31, 2012, the quoted market price of Kronos’ common stock was $24.94 per share, or an aggregate market value of $878.4 million. At December 31, 2011, the quoted market price was $18.04 per share, or an aggregate market value of $635.3 million.

The change in the carrying value of our investment in Kronos during the first quarter of 2012 is summarized below:


	Amount
	(In millions)
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	281.3
Equity in net income of Kronos		41.6
Dividends received from Kronos		(5.3	)
Other, principally equity in other comprehensive income items of Kronos		3.3

Balance at the end of the period	$	320.9

Selected financial information of Kronos is summarized below:


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012
	(In millions)
Current assets	$	865.0	$	1,083.5
Property and equipment, net		485.5		497.1
Investment in TiO₂joint venture		89.2		108.0
Other noncurrent assets		384.2		373.5

Total assets	$	1,823.9	$	2,062.1

Current liabilities	$	328.0	$	316.2
Long-term debt		362.9		479.5
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits		140.3		141.7
Other non-current liabilities		68.4		69.8
Stockholders’ equity		924.3		1,054.9

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,823.9	$	2,062.1

- 12 -


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011		2012
	(In millions)
Net sales	$	420.4	$	561.3
Cost of sales		274.0		299.8
Income from operations		102.4		209.4
Net income		60.3		136.9

Note 6—Other noncurrent assets:


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Patents and other intangible assets, net	$	2,045	$	1,923
Restricted cash		1,551		1,551
Other		662		705

Total	$	4,258	$	4,179

Note 7—Accrued and other current liabilities:


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Employee benefits	$	8,954	$	5,987
Professional fees and legal settlements		2,704		2,655
Payable to affiliates:
Accrued interest payable to TIMET		—		86
Income taxes payable to Valhi		—		155
Other		20		18
Other		2,316		2,481

Total	$	13,994	$	11,382

- 13 -

Note 8—Long-term debt:


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
NL:
Promissory note payable to Valhi	$	4,100	$	6,500
Promissory note issued in conjunction with litigation settlement		9,000		9,000

Subtotal		13,100		15,500

Subsidiary debt:
CompX credit facility		1,955		2,003
CompX promissory note payable to TIMET		22,230		21,230

Subtotal		24,185		23,233

Total debt		37,285		38,733
Less current maturities		10,000		16,500

Total long-term debt	$	27,285	$	22,233

NL—During the first quarter of 2012, we borrowed a net $2.4 million under our promissory note with Valhi. The interest rate on our outstanding borrowings from Valhi was 6.00% at March 31, 2012.

CompX—During the first quarter of 2012, CompX prepaid $1.0 million of principal on the promissory note payable to TIMET. The average interest rates on the promissory note and the revolving bank credit facility for the first quarter of 2012 were 1.6% and 3.4%, respectively.

Note 9—Other noncurrent liabilities:


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Reserve for uncertain tax positions	$	16,832	$	16,832
Insurance claims and expenses		594		583
Other		1,789		1,778

Total	$	19,215	$	19,193

- 14 -

Note 10—Employee benefit plans:

Defined benefit plans—The components of net periodic defined benefit pension cost (income) are presented in the table below.


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Interest cost	$	687		$	628
Expected return on plan assets		(975	)		(914	)
Recognized actuarial losses		217			331

Total	$	(71	)	$	45

Postretirement benefits—The components of net periodic postretirement benefits other than pension cost are presented in the table below.


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Interest cost	$	59		$	39
Amortization of prior service credit		(200	)		(174	)
Recognized actuarial gain		—			(25	)

Total	$	(141	)	$	(160	)

Contributions— We currently expect our 2012 contributions to our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans to be approximately $3.4 million.

Note 11—Income tax provision:


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2012
	(In millions)
Expected tax provision at U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%	$	8.5		$	10.5
Non-U.S. tax rates		(.7	)		(.2	)
Incremental U.S. tax and rate differences on equity in earnings		(1.3	)		(1.5	)
Other		—			(.2	)

Total	$	6.5		$	8.6

Tax authorities are examining certain of our U.S. and non-U.S. tax returns and have or may propose tax deficiencies, including penalties and interest. We cannot guarantee these tax matters will be resolved in our favor due to the inherent uncertainties involved in settlement initiatives and court and tax proceedings. We believe we have adequate accruals for additional taxes and related interest expense which could ultimately result from tax examinations. We believe the ultimate disposition of tax examinations should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

- 15 -

In 2011, Kronos received notices of re-assessment from the Canadian federal and provincial tax authorities related to the years 2002 through 2004. Kronos objects to the re-assessment and believes the position is without merit. Accordingly, the re-assessment is being appealed. If the full amount of the proposed adjustment were ultimately to be assessed against Kronos, the cash tax liability would be approximately $12.2 million. Kronos believes that it has adequate accruals for this matter.

In the first quarter of 2011, CompX recognized a $2.1 million provision for deferred income taxes related to the undistributed earnings of its Canadian subsidiary attributable to the $7.5 million litigation settlement gain discussed in Note 12.

We currently estimate that our unrecognized tax benefits will not change materially during the next twelve months.

Note 12—Commitments and contingencies:

Lead pigment litigation

Our former operations included the manufacture of lead pigments for use in paint and lead-based paint. We, other former manufacturers of lead pigments for use in paint and lead-based paint (together, the “former pigment manufacturers”), and the Lead Industries Association (LIA), which discontinued business operations in 2002, have been named as defendants in various legal proceedings seeking damages for personal injury, property damage and governmental expenditures allegedly caused by the use of lead-based paints. Certain of these actions have been filed by or on behalf of states, counties, cities or their public housing authorities and school districts, and certain others have been asserted as class actions. These lawsuits seek recovery under a variety of theories, including public and private nuisance, negligent product design, negligent failure to warn, strict liability, breach of warranty, conspiracy/concert of action, aiding and abetting, enterprise liability, market share or risk contribution liability, intentional tort, fraud and misrepresentation, violations of state consumer protection statutes, supplier negligence and similar claims.

The plaintiffs in these actions generally seek to impose on the defendants responsibility for lead paint abatement and health concerns associated with the use of lead-based paints, including damages for personal injury, contribution and/or indemnification for medical expenses, medical monitoring expenses and costs for educational programs. To the extent the plaintiffs seek compensatory or punitive damages in these actions, such damages are generally unspecified. In some cases, the damages are unspecified pursuant to the requirements of applicable state law. A number of cases are inactive or have been dismissed or withdrawn. Most of the remaining cases are in various pre-trial stages. Some are on appeal following dismissal or summary judgment rulings in favor of either the defendants or the plaintiffs. In addition, various other cases (in which we are not a defendant) are pending that seek recovery for injury allegedly caused by lead pigment and lead-based paint. Although we are not a defendant in these cases, the outcome of these cases may have an impact on cases that might be filed against us in the future.

We believe that these actions are without merit, and we intend to continue to deny all allegations of wrongdoing and liability and to defend against all actions vigorously. We do not believe it is probable that we have incurred any liability with respect to all of the lead pigment litigation cases to which we are a party, and liability to us that may result, if any, in this regard cannot be reasonably estimated, because:

- 16 -

•

we have never settled any of the market share, risk contribution, intentional tort, fraud, nuisance, supplier negligence, breach of warranty, conspiracy, misrepresentation, aiding and abetting, enterprise liability, or statutory cases,

•

no final, non-appealable adverse verdicts have ever been entered against us, and

•

we have never ultimately been found liable with respect to any such litigation matters.

Accordingly, we have not accrued any amounts for any of the pending lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation cases. New cases may continue to be filed against us. We cannot assure you that we will not incur liability in the future in respect of any of the pending or possible litigation in view of the inherent uncertainties involved in court and jury rulings. The resolution of any of these cases could result in recognition of a loss contingency accrual that could have a material adverse impact on our net income for the interim or annual period during which such liability is recognized and a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition and liquidity.

Environmental matters and litigation

Our operations are governed by various environmental laws and regulations. Certain of our businesses are and have been engaged in the handling, manufacture or use of substances or compounds that may be considered toxic or hazardous within the meaning of applicable environmental laws and regulations. As with other companies engaged in similar businesses, certain of our past and current operations and products have the potential to cause environmental or other damage. We have implemented and continue to implement various policies and programs in an effort to minimize these risks. Our policy is to maintain compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations at all of our plants and to strive to improve environmental performance. From time to time, we may be subject to environmental regulatory enforcement under U.S. and non-U.S. statutes, the resolution of which typically involves the establishment of compliance programs. It is possible that future developments, such as stricter requirements of environmental laws and enforcement policies, could adversely affect our production, handling, use, storage, transportation, sale or disposal of such substances. We believe that all of our facilities are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws.

Certain properties and facilities used in our former operations, including divested primary and secondary lead smelters and former mining locations, are the subject of civil litigation, administrative proceedings or investigations arising under federal and state environmental laws and common law. Additionally, in connection with past operating practices, we are currently involved as a defendant, potentially responsible party (“PRP”) or both, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (“CERCLA”), and similar state laws in various governmental and private actions associated with waste disposal sites, mining locations, and facilities that we or our predecessors, our subsidiaries or their predecessors currently or previously owned, operated or used, certain of which are on the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) Superfund National Priorities List or similar state lists. These proceedings seek cleanup costs, damages for personal injury or property damage and/or damages for injury to natural resources. Certain of these proceedings involve claims for substantial amounts. Although we may be jointly and severally liable for these costs, in most cases we are only one of a number of PRPs who may also be jointly and severally liable, and among whom costs may be shared or allocated. In addition, we are also a party to a number of personal injury lawsuits filed in various jurisdictions alleging claims related to environmental conditions alleged to have resulted from our operations.

- 17 -

Obligations associated with environmental remediation and related matters are difficult to assess and estimate for numerous reasons including the:

•

complexity and differing interpretations of governmental regulations,

•

number of PRPs and their ability or willingness to fund such allocation of costs,

•

financial capabilities of the PRPs and the allocation of costs among them,

•

solvency of other PRPs,

•

multiplicity of possible solutions,

•

number of years of investigatory, remedial and monitoring activity required,

•

uncertainty over the extent, if any, to which our former operations might have contributed to the conditions allegedly giving rise to such personal injury, property damage, natural resource and related claims and

•

number of years between former operations and notice of claims and lack of information and documents about the former operations.

In addition, the imposition of more stringent standards or requirements under environmental laws or regulations, new developments or changes regarding site cleanup costs or allocation of costs among PRPs, solvency of other PRPs, the results of future testing and analysis undertaken with respect to certain sites or a determination that we are potentially responsible for the release of hazardous substances at other sites, could cause our expenditures to exceed our current estimates. We cannot assure you that actual costs will not exceed accrued amounts or the upper end of the range for sites for which estimates have been made, and we cannot assure you that costs will not be incurred for sites where no estimates presently can be made. Further, additional environmental and related matters may arise in the future. If we were to incur any future liability, this could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements, results of operations and liquidity.

We record liabilities related to environmental remediation and related matters when estimated future expenditures are probable and reasonably estimable. We adjust such accruals as further information becomes available to us or as circumstances change. Unless the amounts and timing of such estimated future expenditures are fixed and reasonably determinable, we generally do not discount estimated future expenditures to their present value due to the uncertainty of the timing of the pay out. We recognize recoveries of costs from other parties, if any, as assets when their receipt is deemed probable. At March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011, we have not recognized any receivables for recoveries.

We do not know and cannot estimate the exact time frame over which we will make payments for our accrued environmental and related costs. The timing of payments depends upon a number of factors, including but not limited to the timing of the actual remediation process; which in turn depends on factors outside of our control. At each balance sheet date, we estimate the amount of our accrued environmental and related costs which we expect to pay within the next twelve months, and we classify this estimate as a current liability. We classify the remaining accrued environmental costs as a noncurrent liability.

- 18 -

Changes in the accrued environmental costs during the first quarter of 2012 are as follows:


	Amount
	(In thousands)
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	41,637
Additions charged to expense, net		12,771
Payments, net		(655	)

Balance at the end of the period	$	53,753

Amounts recognized in the balance sheet at the end of the period:
Current liability	$	8,558
Noncurrent liability		45,195

Total	$	53,753

On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the potential range of our liability for environmental remediation and related costs at sites where we have been named as a PRP or defendant, including sites for which our wholly-owned environmental management subsidiary, NL Environmental Management Services, Inc., (EMS), has contractually assumed our obligations. At March 31, 2012, we had accrued approximately $54 million, related to approximately 50 sites, which are associated with remediation and related matters that we believe are at the present time and/or in their current phase reasonably estimable. The upper end of the range of reasonably possible costs to us for remediation and related matters for which we believe it is possible to estimate costs is approximately $86 million, including the amount currently accrued.

We believe that it is not possible to estimate the range of costs for certain sites. At March 31, 2012, there were approximately 5 sites for which we are not currently able to estimate a range of costs. For these sites, generally the investigation is in the early stages, and we are unable to determine whether or not we actually had any association with the site, the nature of our responsibility, if any, for the contamination at the site and the extent of contamination at and cost to remediate the site. The timing and availability of information on these sites is dependent on events outside of our control, such as when the party alleging liability provides information to us. At certain of these previously inactive sites, we have received general and special notices of liability from the EPA and/or state agencies alleging that we, sometimes with other PRPs, are liable for past and future costs of remediating environmental contamination allegedly caused by former operations. These notifications may assert that we, along with any other alleged PRPs, are liable for past and/or future clean-up costs. As further information becomes available to us for any of these sites which would allow us to estimate a range of costs, we would at that time adjust our accruals. Any such adjustment could result in the recognition of an accrual that would have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, results of operations and liquidity

Insurance coverage claims

We are involved in certain legal proceedings with a number of our former insurance carriers regarding the nature and extent of the carriers’ obligations to us under insurance policies with respect to certain lead pigment and asbestos lawsuits. The issue of whether insurance coverage for defense costs or indemnity or both will be found to exist for our lead pigment and asbestos litigation depends upon a variety of factors and we cannot assure you that such insurance coverage will be available.

- 19 -

We have agreements with three former insurance carriers pursuant to which the carriers reimburse us for a portion of our future lead pigment litigation defense costs, and one such carrier reimburses us for a portion of our future asbestos litigation defense costs. We are not able to determine how much we will ultimately recover from these carriers for defense costs incurred by us because of certain issues that arise regarding which defense costs qualify for reimbursement. While we continue to seek additional insurance recoveries, we do not know if we will be successful in obtaining reimbursement for either defense costs or indemnity. Accordingly, we recognize insurance recoveries in income only when receipt of the recovery is probable and we are able to reasonably estimate the amount of the recovery.

For a complete discussion of certain litigation involving us and certain of our former insurance carriers, refer to our 2011 Annual Report.

CompX

Prior to March 9, 2011, CompX was involved in certain patent litigation with a competitor, and in March 2011, CompX entered into a confidential settlement agreement with them. Under the terms of the agreement, the competitor paid CompX’s Canadian subsidiary approximately $7.5 million in cash (which was recognized as a litigation settlement gain in the first quarter of 2011), and agreed to cross-license certain patents and to withdraw certain legal proceedings against the other party.

Other litigation

We have been named as a defendant in various lawsuits in several jurisdictions, alleging personal injuries as a result of occupational exposure primarily to products manufactured by our former operations containing asbestos, silica and/or mixed dust. In addition, some plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos from working in various facilities previously owned and/or operated by us. There are 1,125 of these types of cases pending, involving a total of approximately 2,050 plaintiffs. In addition, the claims of approximately 8,075 plaintiffs have been administratively dismissed or placed on the inactive docket in Ohio, Indiana and Texas state courts. We do not expect these claims will be re-opened unless the plaintiffs meet the courts’ medical criteria for asbestos-related claims. We have not accrued any amounts for this litigation because of the uncertainty of liability and inability to reasonably estimate the liability, if any. To date, we have not been adjudicated liable in any of these matters. Based on information available to us, including:

•

facts concerning historical operations,

•

the rate of new claims,

•

the number of claims from which we have been dismissed and

•

our prior experience in the defense of these matters,

we believe that the range of reasonably possible outcomes of these matters will be consistent with our historical costs (which are not material). Furthermore, we do not expect any reasonably possible outcome would involve amounts material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. We have sought and will continue to vigorously seek, dismissal and/or a finding of no liability from each claim. In addition, from time to time, we have received notices regarding asbestos or silica claims purporting to be brought against former subsidiaries, including notices provided to insurers with which we have entered into settlements extinguishing certain insurance policies. These insurers may seek indemnification from us.

For a discussion of other legal proceedings to which we are a party, refer to our 2011 Annual Report.

- 20 -

In May 2012, we reached an agreement with the New Jersey governmental authority and the real estate developer pursuant to which NL received an aggregate of $15.6 million cash for the third and final closing contemplated by the October 2008 settlement agreement associated with certain real property NL owned in New Jersey, as more fully described in Note 19 in our 2011 Annual Report. Upon NL’s receipt of these cash proceeds, NL’s equitable lien on a portion of such property was released. We expect to recognize a pre-tax gain of approximately $15 million in the second quarter of 2012, based on the excess of the cash proceeds received over our carrying value of the property from which our equitable lien was released.

In addition to the litigation described above, we and our affiliate are also involved in various other environmental, contractual, product liability, patent (or intellectual property), employment and other claims and disputes incidental to present and former businesses. In certain cases, we have insurance coverage for these items, although we do not expect additional material insurance coverage for environmental matters.

We currently believe the disposition of all of these various other claims and disputes, individually and in the aggregate, should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity beyond the accruals already provided.

Note 13—Financial instruments:

See Note 4 for information on how we determine fair value of our marketable securities.

The following table presents the financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but which require fair value disclosure at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012:

December 31, 2011

March 31, 2012

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

(in millions)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

16.5

10.0

Notes payable to affiliates

26.3

27.7

CompX bank credit facility

2.0

2.0

Promissory note payable

9.0

9.0

Noncontrolling interest in CompX common stock

11.0

24.0

11.1

22.7

NL stockholders’ equity

415.0

631.2

408.5

725.1

The fair value of our noncurrent marketable securities, noncontrolling interest in CompX and NL stockholder’s equity are based upon quoted market prices at each balance sheet date, which represent Level 1 inputs. The fair value of our promissory note payable and our variable interest rate debt is deemed to approximate book value. Due to their near-term maturities, the carrying amounts of accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered equivalent to fair value.

Certain of our sales generated by CompX’s non-U.S. operations are denominated in U.S. dollars. CompX periodically uses currency forward contracts to manage a portion of currency exchange rate market risk associated

- 21 -

with receivables, or similar exchange rate risk associated with future sales, denominated in a currency other than the holder’s functional currency. CompX has not entered into these contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the past, nor does it anticipate entering into such contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the future. Most of the currency forward contracts meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP and are designated as cash flow hedges. For these currency forward contracts, gains and losses representing the effective portion of our hedges are deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, and are subsequently recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings. Occasionally CompX enters into currency forward contracts which do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. For these contracts, we mark-to-market the estimated fair value of the contracts at each balance sheet date based on quoted market prices for the forward contracts, with any resulting gain or loss recognized in income as part of net currency transactions. The quoted market prices for the forward contracts are a Level 1 input as defined by ASC Topic 820-10-35.

At March 31, 2012, CompX held a series of contracts to exchange an aggregate of U.S. $13.3 million for an equivalent value of Canadian dollars at exchange rates ranging from Cdn. $1.03 to Cdn. $0.99 per U.S. dollar. These contracts qualified for hedge accounting and mature through December 2012. The exchange rate was $1.00 per U.S. dollar at March 31, 2012. The estimated fair value of the contracts based on quoted market prices was an asset of approximately $315,000 at March 31, 2012. At December 31, 2011, CompX held a series of contracts to exchange an aggregate of U.S. $17.9 million for an equivalent value of Canadian dollars at exchange rates ranging from Cdn. $1.03 to Cdn. $0.99 per U.S. dollar. These contracts qualified for hedge accounting and mature through December 2012. The exchange rate was Cdn. $1.02 per U.S. dollar at December 31, 2011. The estimated fair value of the contracts based on quoted market prices was a liability of approximately $19,000 at December 31, 2011.

Note 14—Recent accounting standards:

In June 2011 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option of presenting comprehensive income as a component of the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and instead requires comprehensive income to be presented as a component of the Consolidated Statement of Income or in a separate Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income immediately following the Consolidated Statement of Income. In accordance with ASU 2011-05, we now present our comprehensive income in a separate Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. Additionally, ASU 2011-05 would have required us to present on the face of our financial statements the effect of reclassifications out of accumulative other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income. However, in December 2011 the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. ASU 2011-12 defers the effective date for the requirement to present on the face of our financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income. Adoption of ASU 2011-05, as amended by ASU 2011-12, did not have a material effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 22 -

In December 2011 the FASB issued ASU 2011-11 Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2011-11 requires entities to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the balance sheet and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. This standard will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning with our first quarter 2013 report. We do not believe the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 23 -

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Business and results of operations overview

We are primarily a holding company. We operate in the component products industry through our majority-owned subsidiary, CompX International Inc. We also own a non-controlling interest in Kronos Worldwide, Inc. Both CompX (NYSE Amex: CIX) and Kronos (NYSE: KRO) file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

CompX is a leading manufacturer of engineered components utilized in a variety of applications and industries. Through its Security Products division, CompX manufactures mechanical and electronic cabinet locks and other locking mechanisms used in postal, office and institutional furniture, transportation, vending, tool storage and other general cabinetry applications. CompX’s Furniture Components division manufactures precision ball bearing slides and ergonomic computer support systems used in office and institutional furniture, home appliances, tool storage and a variety of other applications. CompX also manufactures stainless steel exhaust systems, gauges and electronic and mechanical throttle controls for the performance boat industry through its Marine Components division.

We account for our 30% non-controlling interest in Kronos by the equity method. Kronos is a leading global producer and marketer of value-added titanium dioxide pigments (TiO₂ ₎. TiO₂ is used for a variety of manufacturing applications including plastics, paints, paper and other industrial products.

Forward-looking information

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking in nature and represents management’s beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. Statements found in this report including, but not limited to, the statements found in Item 2 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” are forward-looking statements that represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. In some cases you can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “anticipates,” “expects” or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategies or trends. Although we believe the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not know if these expectations will be correct. Such statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results. Actual future results could differ materially from those predicted. The factors that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those described herein are the risks and uncertainties discussed in this Quarterly Report and those described from time to time in our other filings with the SEC, which include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

Future supply and demand for our products;

•

The extent of the dependence of certain of our businesses on certain market sectors;

•

The cyclicality of our businesses (such as Kronos’ TiO₂operations);

•

Customer inventory levels;

- 24 -

•

Changes in raw material and other operating costs (such as energy, ore and steel costs) and our ability to pass those costs on to our customers or offset them with reductions in other operating costs;

•

Changes in the availability of raw material (such as ore);

•

General global economic and political conditions (such as changes in the level of gross domestic product in various regions of the world and the impact of such changes on demand for, among other things, TiO₂and component products);

•

Possible disruption of Kronos’ or CompX’s business, or increases in our cost of doing business resulting from terrorist activities or global conflicts;

•

Competitive products and prices, including increased competition from low-cost manufacturing sources (such as China);

•

Customer and competitor strategies;

•

Potential consolidation of Kronos’ competitors;

•

Demand for office furniture;

•

Substitute products;

•

The impact of pricing and production decisions;

•

Competitive technology positions;

•

Potential difficulties in upgrading or implementing new manufacturing and accounting software systems;

•

The introduction of trade barriers;

•

The impact of current or future government regulations (including employee healthcare benefit related regulations;

•

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates (such as changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and each of the euro, the Norwegian krone and the Canadian dollar), or possible disruptions to our business resulting from potential instability resulting from uncertainties associated with the euro;

•

Operating interruptions (including, but not limited to, labor disputes, leaks, natural disasters, fires, explosions, unscheduled or unplanned downtime and transportation interruptions);

•

The timing and amounts of insurance recoveries;

•

Our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity;

•

The extent to which our subsidiaries were to become unable to pay us dividends;

•

CompX’s and Kronos’ ability to renew or refinance debt;

•

CompX’s ability to comply with covenants contained in its revolving bank credit facility;

•

The ultimate outcome of income tax audits, tax settlement initiatives or other tax matters;

•

Potential difficulties in integrating completed or future acquisitions;

•

Decisions to sell operating assets other than in the ordinary course of business;

•

Uncertainties associated with the development of new product features;

•

Our ability to utilize income tax attributes or changes in income tax rates related to such attributes, the benefits of which have been recognized under the more-likely-than-not recognition criteria;

•

Environmental matters (such as those requiring compliance with emission and discharge standards for existing and new facilities or new developments regarding environmental remediation at sites related to our former operations);

•

Government laws and regulations and possible changes therein (such as changes in government regulations which might impose various obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigment and lead-based paint, including us, with respect to asserted health concerns associated with the use of such products);

- 25 -

•

The ultimate resolution of pending litigation (such as our lead pigment and environmental matters) and

•

Possible future litigation.

Should one or more of these risks materialize or if the consequences of such a development worsen, or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from those currently forecasted or expected. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement whether as a result of changes in information, future events or otherwise.

Results of Operations

Net income overview

Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2011

Our net income attributable to NL stockholders was $21.0 million, or $.43 per share in the first quarter of 2012 compared to net income of $17.2 million, or $.35 per share, in the first quarter of 2011. As more fully described below, our net income per share increased from 2011 to 2012 primarily due to the net effect of:

•

higher equity in net income from Kronos in 2012,

•

higher environmental remediation and related costs,

•

higher insurance recoveries in 2012 and

•

lower income from operations from component products in 2012 primarily due to a litigation settlement gain in 2011 as discussed below.

Our 2012 net income attributable to NL stockholders includes income of $.01 per share, net of income taxes, related to insurances recoveries we recognized.

Our 2011 net income attributable to NL stockholders includes:

•

income of $.06 per share, net of noncontrolling interest and income taxes, related to a CompX patent litigation settlement and

•

a charge of $.01 per share included in our equity in Kronos in 2011 consisting of a call premium and the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and original issue discount associated with Kronos’ redemption of Senior Notes.

Income (loss) from operations

The following table shows the components of our income (loss) from operations.


	Three months ended
	March 31,						%
	2011			2012			Change
	(In millions)
CompX	$	8.8			2.9			(67	)%
Insurance recoveries		.4			1.1			175	%
Corporate expense and other, net		(3.5	)		(16.1	)		360	%


Income (loss) from operations	$	5.7		$	(12.1	)		(312	)%

- 26 -

Amounts attributable to CompX relate to its components products business, while the other amounts generally relate to NL. Each of these items is further discussed below.

The following table shows the components of our income (loss) before income taxes exclusive of our income from operations.


	Three months ended
	March 31,						%
	2011			2012			Change
	(In millions)

Equity in earnings of Kronos	$	18.3		$	41.6			127	%
Interest and dividend income		.6			.7			17	%
Interest expense		(.5	)		(.3	)		(40	)%

CompX International Inc.


	Three months ended
	March 31,						%
	2011			2012			Change
	(In millions)

Net sales	$	34.8		$	35.5			2	%
Cost of sales		26.1			26.0			—


Gross margin		8.7			9.5
Operating costs and expenses		(6.2	)		(6.6	)		6	%
Litigation settlement gain		7.5			—			(100	)%
Litigation expense		(.2	)		—			(100	)%
Facility consolidation expense		(1.0	)		—			(100	)%


Income from operations	$	8.8		$	2.9			(67	)%


Percentage of net sales:
Cost of sales		75	%		73	%
Income from operations		26	%		8	%

Net sales – Net sales increased 2% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011. Net sales increased in 2012 principally due to $1.1 million in sales during the quarter from the Furniture Components new ergonomics healthcare product line acquired in 2011 and from growth in customer demand within our Security Products and Marine segments resulting from improving economic conditions in North America, partially offset by lower Furniture Component sales from other product lines.

Cost of sales and gross margin – Cost of sales as a percentage of sales decreased by 2% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. As a result, gross profit and related margin increased over the same period. The increase in gross profit is primarily due to improved production efficiencies principally within the Furniture Components business unit as a result of the consolidation of its precision slides manufacturing facilities completed in 2011. The gross margin percentage impact relating to the above noted July 2011 acquisition of a Furniture Components products business was not significant.

Litigation – The litigation settlement gain of approximately $7.5 million (attributable to CompX’s Furniture Components division) is discussed in Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 27 -

Facility consolidation costs – In the first quarter of 2011, the Furniture Components business recorded approximately $1.0 million in relocation costs as a result of consolidating two of our precision slides facilities.

Income from operations – Income from operations decreased to $2.9 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared to $8.8 million for the first quarter of 2011. Income from operations decreased in 2012 primarily due to the net effects of the litigation settlement gain recorded in the first quarter of 2011, facility consolidation costs incurred in 2011, improved production efficiencies in 2012 as a result of the Furniture Components facility consolidation and slightly increased sales in 2012 across all business units.

Our Furniture Components business has substantial operations and assets located outside the United States (in Canada and Taiwan). The majority of sales generated from our non-U.S. operations are denominated in the U.S. dollar, with the remainder denominated in non-U.S. currencies, principally the Canadian dollar and the New Taiwan dollar. Most raw materials, labor and other production costs for our non-U.S. operations are denominated primarily in local currencies. Consequently, the translated U.S. dollar values of our non-U.S. sales and operating results are subject to currency exchange rate fluctuations which may favorably or unfavorably impact reported earnings and may affect comparability of period-to-period operating results. In addition to the impact of the translation of sales and expenses over time, our non-U.S. operations also generate currency transaction gains and losses which primarily relate to the difference between the currency exchange rates in effect when non-U.S. currency sales or operating costs are initially accrued and when such amounts are settled with the non-local currency. However, the impact of relative changes in currency exchange rates on sales and income from operations in 2012 was not significant.

Results by Reporting Unit

The key performance indicator for CompX’s reporting units is the level of their income from operations (see discussion below).


	Three months ended March 31,						%
	2011			2012			Change
	(In thousands)
Net sales:
Security Products	$	17,788		$	18,195			2	%
Furniture Components		14,895			15,103			1	%
Marine Components		2,094			2,233			7	%


Total net sales	$	34,777		$	35,531			2	%


Gross margin:
Security Products	$	5,844		$	5,690			(3	)%
Furniture Components		2,588			3,461			34	%
Marine Components		248			323			30	%


Total gross margin	$	8,680		$	9,474			9	%


Income (loss) from operations:
Security Products	$	3,574		$	3,471			(3	)%
Furniture Components		6,874			1,325			(81	)%
Marine Components		(355	)		(250	)		30	%
Corporate operating expenses		(1,333	)		(1,637	)		(23	)%


Total income from operations	$	8,760		$	2,909			(67	)%

- 28 -

Security Products. Security Products net sales increased 2% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period last year. The increase in sales is primarily due to improved economic conditions in North America. Gross margin, as a percentage of net sales, decreased 2% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 due to a slightly higher raw material costs and a slightly less favorable product mix in 2012. As a result, income from operations, as a percentage of net sales, for the Security Products reporting unit decreased 1% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011.

Furniture Components. Furniture Components net sales increased 1% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period last year. Net sales were positively impacted by $1.1 million in sales relating to the July 2011 acquisition of an ergonomics healthcare component products business. This increase in sales was partially offset by a decrease in overall demand for other Furniture Components products due to a decrease in customer office furniture projects. Gross margin increased from 17% in the first three months of 2011 to 23% in the first three months of 2012. The increase in gross margin was primarily the result of a 3% reduction in fixed manufacturing costs primarily as a result of the 2011 precision slides facility consolidation. The impact of the acquired ergonomics component business on gross margin percentage for 2012 was not significant. Furniture Components 2011 income from operations includes: (i) a litigation settlement gain of $7.5 million, (ii) litigation expenses of $227,000, and (iii) facility consolidation costs of approximately $1.0 million. Excluding the litigation settlement gain, litigation expenses and facility consolidation costs, income from operations percentage increased 4 percentage points in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to the increase in gross margin as noted above.

Marine Components. Marine Components net sales increased 7% in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period last year. Gross margin and loss from operations percentage improved in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to increased leverage of fixed costs as a result of higher sales and lower intangible amortization expense due to intangibles that became fully amortized during 2011.

Outlook – Consistent with the current state of the North American economy, overall demand from our customers continues to be subject to instability. While we experienced a slight increase in demand across most of our markets during the first quarter of 2012, demand from several of our significant office furniture industry customers was weak but was more than offset by $1.1 million in sales during the quarter from the ergonomic healthcare components business acquired in July 2011. Due to the current economic situation, it is uncertain (i) whether sales to office furniture industry customers will improve during the remainder of 2012, (ii) what the ongoing impact on sales of the acquired ergonomics components business will be or (iii) the extent that sales will grow across the remainder of our customers during 2012. While changes in market demand are not within our control, we are focused on the areas we can impact. Staffing levels are continuously evaluated in relation to sales order rates which may result in headcount adjustments, to the extent possible, to match staffing levels with demand. We expect our continuous lean manufacturing and cost improvement initiatives, such as the 2011 consolidation of our Furniture Components facilities, to positively impact productivity and result in a more efficient infrastructure. Additionally, we continue to seek opportunities to gain market share in markets we currently serve, to expand into new markets and to develop new product features in order to mitigate the impact of changes in demand as well as broaden our sales base.

- 29 -

Volatility in the costs of commodity raw materials is ongoing. Our primary commodity raw materials are steel, brass, alloyed zinc and stainless steel, which together represent approximately 18% of our total cost of goods sold. Compared to 2011, the overall change in the cost of these raw materials was not significant in the first quarter of 2012. We generally seek to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in commodity raw material costs on our margins through improvements in production efficiencies or other operating cost reductions as well as occasionally executing larger quantity strategic purchases of these raw materials, which may result in higher inventory balances for a period of time. In the event we are unable to offset commodity raw material cost increases with other cost reductions, it may be difficult to recover those cost increases through increased product selling prices or surcharges due to the competitive nature of the markets served by our products. Additionally, significant surcharges may negatively affect margins as they typically only recover the increased cost of the raw material without adding margin dollars resulting in a lower margin percentage. Consequently, overall operating margins may be negatively affected by commodity raw material cost pressures.

During the first quarter of 2012, the value of the U.S. dollar did not change significantly in comparison to the Canadian dollar or the New Taiwan dollar, which are the primary currencies of our non-U.S. operations. However, the U.S. dollar could weaken during the remainder of 2012, which may have a negative impact on our 2012 results in comparison to 2011. When practical, we will seek to mitigate the negative impact of changes in currency exchange rates on our results by entering into currency hedging contracts. However, such strategies cannot fully mitigate the negative impact of changes in currency exchange rates. See Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for currency hedging contracts in place at March 31, 2012.

General corporate and other items

Insurance recoveries – We have agreements with certain insurance carriers pursuant to which the carriers reimburse us for a portion of our past lead pigment and asbestos litigation defense costs. Insurance recoveries include amounts we received from these insurance carriers.

The agreements with certain of our insurance carriers also include reimbursement for a portion of our future litigation defense costs. We are not able to determine how much we will ultimately recover from these carriers for defense costs incurred by us because of certain issues that arise regarding which defense costs qualify for reimbursement. Accordingly, these insurance recoveries are recognized when the receipt is probable and the amount is determinable. See Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Litigation settlement gain – We expect to report a $15 million pre-tax gain in the second quarter of 2012 pursuant to the third and final closing associated with certain real property we formerly owned in New Jersey. See Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Corporate expense – Corporate expenses were $16.2 million in the first quarter of 2012, $12.8 million higher than in the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to higher environmental remediation and related costs in 2012. Included in corporate expense are:

- 30 -

•

litigation and related costs of $1.9 million in 2012 compared to $1.8 million in 2011 and

•

environmental remediation and related costs of $12.8 million in 2012, compared to $.2 million in 2011.

Overall, we expect our general corporate expenses for all of calendar 2012 will be higher than 2011 due to higher expected litigation and related expenses and higher environmental remediation and related costs. If our current expectations regarding the number of cases or sites in which we expect to be involved during 2012, or if the nature of such cases or sites were to change, our corporate expenses could be higher than we currently estimate and involve amounts that are material.

The level of our litigation and related expenses varies from period to period depending upon, among other things, the number of cases in which we are currently involved, the nature of such cases and the current stage of such cases (e.g. discovery, pre-trial motions, trial or appeal, if applicable). See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. If our current expectations regarding the number of cases in which we expect to be involved during 2012 or the nature of such cases were to change, our corporate expenses could be higher than we currently estimate.

Obligations for environmental remediation costs are difficult to assess and estimate and it is possible that actual costs for environmental remediation will exceed accrued amounts or that costs will be incurred in the future for sites in which we cannot currently estimate our liability. If these events were to occur in 2012, our corporate expenses would be higher than we currently estimate. In addition, we adjust our environmental accruals as further information becomes available to us or as circumstances change. Such further information or changed circumstances could result in an increase in our accrued environmental costs. See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Provision for income taxes – We recognized an income tax expense of $8.6 million in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to $6.5 million in the first quarter of 2011. The higher income tax expense recognized during 2012 is primarily attributable to higher equity in earnings of Kronos. Our income tax expense in the first quarter of 2011 includes a $2.1 million provision recognized for deferred income taxes related to the undistributed earnings of our Canadian subsidiary attributable to the $7.5 million litigation settlement gain discussed in Note 12. See Note 11 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary – Noncontrolling interest in net income of subsidiary decreased $.3 million in the first three months of 2012 as compared to the first three months of 2011 due to lower net income of CompX in 2012.

- 31 -

Equity in net income of Kronos Worldwide, Inc.


	Three months ended March 31,						%
	2011			2012			Change
	(In millions)
Kronos historical:
Net sales	$	420.4		$	561.3			34	%
Cost of sales		274.0			299.8			9	%


Gross margin	$	146.4		$	261.5


Income from operations	$	102.4		$	209.4			104	%
Interest and dividend income		1.7			2.3			35	%
Loss on prepayment of debt		(3.3	)		—			100	%
Interest expense		(9.6	)		(6.3	)		(52	)%

		91.2			205.4
Income tax expense		30.9			68.5			122	%


Net income	$	60.3		$	136.9


Percentage of net sales:
Cost of sales		65	%		53	%
Income from operations		24	%		37	%

TiO₂ operating statistics:
Sales volumes*		125			130			5	%
Production volumes*		133			140			5	%

Percentage change in TiO₂net sales:
Ti0₂product pricing								34	%
Ti0₂sales volume								5
Ti0₂product mix								(3	)
Changes in currency exchange rates								(2	)


Total								34	%

*	Thousands of metric tons

The key performance indicators for Kronos are TiO₂ average selling prices and TiO₂ sales and production volumes.

Current TiO₂ industry conditions – Throughout 2011 and continuing into 2012, Kronos’ production facilities operated at full practical capacity rates. Kronos also increased TiO₂ selling prices resulting in increased profitability and cash flows. Kronos’ selling prices in the first quarter 2012 were 34% higher as compared to the first quarter of 2011, and average selling prices at the end of the first quarter of 2012 were comparable to selling prices at the end of 2011. Global customer demand for Kronos’ TiO₂ products also remained strong throughout much of 2011. Although Kronos experienced a softening of demand in the fourth quarter of 2011 as a result of customer destocking, customer demand in the first quarter of 2012 rebounded from the softness experienced in the fourth quarter of 2011. Kronos expects demand will continue to strengthen during the remainder of 2012, and anticipates it will be able to implement further TiO₂selling price increases.

Kronos experienced increased costs for its raw materials such as ore and petroleum coke in 2011 and in the first quarter 2012. Kronos expects further increases in raw material costs throughout 2012, as discussed below.

- 32 -

Overall, based on positive market dynamics in the TiO₂ industry, Kronos expects its profitability and cash flows to increase in 2012 and the foreseeable future.

Net sales – Kronos’ net sales in the first quarter of 2012 increased 34%, or $140.9 million, compared to the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to a 34% increase in average TiO₂ selling prices. TiO₂ selling prices will increase or decrease generally as a result of competitive market pressures, changes in the relative level of supply and demand as well as changes in raw material and other manufacturing costs. Based on current conditions in the TiO₂ industry, as well as the expectation for increases in Kronos’ manufacturing costs discussed below, Kronos currently expects average selling prices in the remainder of 2012 to continue to be higher than the comparable periods in 2011.

Kronos’ sales volumes increased 5% in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the first quarter of 2011 due to increased customer demand, primarily in the North American and export markets. Kronos’ sales volumes in the first quarter of 2012 set a new record for a first quarter. In addition, Kronos estimates the unfavorable effect of changes in currency exchange rates decreased its net sales by approximately $9 million, or 2%, as compared to the first quarter of 2011.

Cost of sales – Kronos’ cost of sales increased $25.8 million or 9% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the net impact of a 5% increase in sales volumes, a 5% increase in TiO₂ production volumes, higher raw material costs of approximately $27 million (primarily feedstock ore and petroleum coke) and currency fluctuations (primarily the euro). Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased to 53% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to 65% in the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to the higher selling prices and higher production volumes in the first quarter of 2012. Kronos’ production volumes in the first quarter of 2012 set a new record for a first quarter. Kronos expects further increases in its manufacturing costs during the remainder of 2012, as discussed below.

Income from operations – Kronos’ income from operations increased by $107.0 million from $102.4 million in the first quarter of 2011 to $209.4 million in the first quarter of 2012. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales increased to 37% in the first quarter of 2012 from 24% in the same period of 2011. This increase was driven by the improvement in gross margin, which increased to 47% for the first quarter of 2012 compared to 35% for the first quarter of 2011. Kronos’ gross margin has increased primarily because of higher selling prices, higher sales volumes and higher production volumes all of which more than offset the impact of higher manufacturing costs (primarily raw materials). Additionally, changes in currency exchange rates have negatively affected Kronos’ gross margin and income from operations. Kronos estimates that changes in currency exchange rates decreased income from operations by approximately $3 million in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011.

Other non-operating income (expense) – On March 24, 2011, Kronos redeemed €80 million of its 6.5% Senior Secured Notes, and borrowed under its European revolving credit facility. As a result, Kronos recognized a $3.3 million pre-tax interest charge related to the prepayment of the 6.5% Senior Secured Notes in the first quarter of 2011, consisting of the call premium and the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and original issue discount associated with the redeemed Senior Notes.

- 33 -

With respect to Kronos’ €279.2 million principal amount outstanding at March 31, 2012 of its Senior Secured Notes due in April 2013, Kronos has commenced efforts to refinance the Senior Notes, and has engaged a financial advisor to assist in these efforts. The definitive terms of any such refinancing have not yet been determined, and while there can be no assurance that Kronos would be able to complete a refinancing on terms acceptable to it, Kronos believes it will be able to refinance the remaining Senior Notes before their maturity date.

Kronos’ interest expense decreased $3.3 million from $9.6 million in the first quarter of 2011 to $6.3 million in the first quarter of 2012 due to the net effects of the prepayment and open market purchases of a portion of the 6.5% Senior Secured Notes made in the third and fourth quarters of 2011. The interest expense Kronos recognizes will vary with fluctuations in the euro exchange rate.

Income tax provision – Kronos’ income tax provision was $68.5 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared to $30.9 million in the same period last year. This increase is primarily due to Kronos’ increased earnings.

Kronos has substantial net operating loss carryforwards in Germany (the equivalent of $799 million and $188 million for German corporate and trade tax purposes, respectively, at December 31, 2011). At March 31, 2012, Kronos has concluded that no deferred income tax asset valuation allowance is required to be recognized with respect to such carryforwards, principally because (i) such carryforwards have an indefinite carryforward period, (ii) Kronos has utilized a portion of such carryforwards during the most recent three-year period and (iii) Kronos currently expects to utilize the remainder of such carryforwards over the long term. However, prior to the complete utilization of such carryforwards, particularly if the economic recovery were to be short-lived or Kronos were to generate losses in its German operations for an extended period of time, it is possible that Kronos might conclude the benefit of such carryforwards would no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition criteria, at which point Kronos would be required to recognize a valuation allowance against some or all of the then-remaining tax benefit associated with the carryforwards.

Effects of Currency Exchange Rates – Kronos has substantial operations and assets located outside the United States (primarily in Germany, Belgium, Norway and Canada). The majority of Kronos’ sales from non-U.S. operations are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the euro, other major European currencies and the Canadian dollar. A portion of Kronos’ sales generated from its non-U.S. operations is denominated in the U.S. dollar. Certain raw materials used worldwide, primarily titanium-containing feedstocks, are purchased in U.S. dollars, while labor and other production costs are purchased primarily in local currencies. Consequently, the translated U.S. dollar value of Kronos’ non-U.S. sales and operating results are subject to currency exchange rate fluctuations which may favorably or unfavorably impact reported earnings and may affect the comparability of period-to-period operating results. In addition to the impact of the translation of sales and expenses over time, Kronos’ non-U.S. operations also generate currency transaction gains and losses which primarily relate to the difference between the currency exchange rates in effect when non-local currency sales or operating costs are initially accrued and when such amounts are settled with the non-local currency.

Overall, Kronos estimates that fluctuations in currency exchange rates had the following effects on sales and income from operations for the periods indicated.

- 34 -


Impact of changes in currency exchange rates Three months ended March 31, 2012 vs March 31, 2011
	Transaction gains recognized							Translation loss - impact of rate changes			Total currency impact 2012 vs 2011
	2011		2012		Change			Translation loss - impact of rate changes			Total currency impact 2012 vs 2011
	(in millions)
Impact on:
Net sales	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(9	)	$	(9	)
Income from operations		1		—		(1	)		(2	)		(3	)

Outlook – During the first quarter of 2012, Kronos operated its production facilities at full practical capacity levels, consistent with its operating rates throughout 2011. While Kronos will continue to work on debottlenecking projects in 2012 to increase its production capacity, Kronos believes such debottlenecking projects will produce relatively nominal increases in its capacity. Kronos currently expects to operate its facilities in 2012 at production levels consistent with or slightly lower than 2011.

The overall strengthening global demand for TiO₂ we experienced in the first quarter of 2012 is expected to continue through the remainder of the year. Kronos currently expects its sales volumes to increase in 2012 as compared to 2011, and its 2012 sales volumes to exceed 2012 production volumes.

Kronos implemented significant increases in TiO₂selling prices throughout 2011 and raised prices in certain markets in the first quarter of 2012. Kronos’ average TiO₂ selling prices were 34% higher in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the first quarter of 2011, and its average selling prices at the end of the first quarter of 2012 were comparable to prices at the end of 2011. Based on product demand levels and increases in its manufacturing costs discussed below, Kronos anticipates its average selling prices will increase during the remainder of 2012, including increases to offset the impact of its expected higher manufacturing costs.

During 2012, Kronos expects to see significantly higher feedstock ore costs driven by tight ore supplies and higher-than-historical increases in petroleum coke and energy costs. Overall, Kronos currently expects its per metric ton cost of TiO₂ it produces in 2012 will increase approximately 50% to 60% as compared to 2011, primarily due to higher feedstock ore costs. Kronos’ cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in calendar 2012 is consequently expected to be significantly higher as compared to calendar 2011. However, Kronos’ cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in the first quarter of 2012 is significantly lower as compared to its expected cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in the remainder of 2012, as a substantial portion of the TiO₂ products Kronos sold in the first quarter of 2012 was produced with lower-cost feedstock ore. Given the current conditions in the TiO₂ industry, if Kronos’ costs of production exceed its current expectations in 2012 and demand for TiO₂ remains strong, Kronos believes it could recoup such higher costs through additional selling price increases.

Overall, Kronos expects income from operations will be higher in 2012 as compared to 2011, as the favorable effects of higher selling prices and sales volumes will more than offset the impact of higher production costs.

Kronos’ expectations as to the future of the TiO₂ industry are based upon a number of factors beyond its control, including worldwide growth of gross domestic product, competition in the marketplace, continued operation of competitors, unexpected or earlier-than-expected capacity additions or reductions and technological advances. If actual developments differ from its expectations, Kronos’ results of operations could be unfavorably affected.

- 35 -

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Consolidated cash flows

Operating activities

Trends in cash flows from operating activities, excluding the impact of deferred taxes and relative changes in assets and liabilities, are generally similar to trends in our income from operations. Cash flows used in operating activities were $1.1 million in the first three months of 2012 compared to cash flows provided by operating activities of $17.4 million in the first three months of 2011.

The $18.5 million increase in cash used in operating activities includes the net effect of:

•

lower dividends received in 2012 of $16.7 million primarily due to Kronos’ special dividend of $.50 per share in the first three months of 2011,

•

lower results from operations in 2012 attributable to CompX of $5.9 million, due to the $7.5 million received from CompX’s litigation settlement in the first quarter of 2011,

•

higher cash received from insurance recoveries in 2012 of $1.2 million,

•

lower amount of net cash used for relative changes in receivables, inventories, payables and accrued liabilities in 2012 of $5.2 million,

•

higher cash paid for income taxes in 2012 of $1.8 million and

•

lower cash paid for interest in 2012 of $1.1 million due to the interest payment on our note payable to affiliate in March 2011 which included deferred interest for all of 2010. See Note 8 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

We do not have complete access to CompX’s cash flows in part because we do not own 100% of CompX. A detail of our consolidated cash flows from operating activities is presented in the table below. Intercompany dividends have been eliminated. The reference to NL Parent in the table below is a reference to NL Industries, Inc., as the parent company of CompX and our other wholly-owned subsidiaries.


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2012
	(In millions)

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
CompX	$	.1		$	(2.9	)
NL Parent and wholly-owned subsidiaries		18.6			3.1
Eliminations		(1.3	)		(1.3	)


Total	$	17.4		$	(1.1	)

Relative changes in working capital can have a significant effect on cash flows from operating activities. Generally, we expect average days’ sales outstanding to increase from December to March as the result of a seasonal increase in sales during the first quarter compared to the fourth quarter. Overall, March 31, 2012 days sales outstanding compared to December 31, 2011 is in line with our expectations. The decrease in days in inventory

- 36 -

was the result of an increase in sales volume in the first quarter of 2012 without a significant change in inventory. Overall March 31, 2012 days in inventory compared to December 31, 2011 is in line with our expectations. For comparative purposes, we have provided December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011 numbers below.

December 31,
2010

March 31,
2011

December 31,
2011

March 31,
2012

Days sales outstanding

41 days

39 days

40 days

Days in inventory

70 days

68 days

71 days

69 days

Investing and financing activities

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $.8 million in the first three months of 2012. We used $.7 million and $.6 million for capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, respectively, substantially all of which related to CompX.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $4.9 million in the first quarter of 2012.

During 2012:

•

we borrowed a net $2.4 million on a promissory note with Valhi and

•

CompX paid $1.0 million in principal repayments on long-term debt.

During each of the first quarters of 2012 and 2011 we paid $6.1 million, or $.125 per share, in dividends. Distributions to noncontrolling interests consist of CompX dividends paid to shareholders other than us.

Provisions contained in certain of CompX’s and Kronos’ credit agreements could result in the acceleration of the applicable indebtedness prior to its stated maturity for reasons other than defaults from failing to comply with typical financial covenants. For example, certain credit agreements allow the lender to accelerate the maturity of the indebtedness upon a change of control (as defined) of the borrower. In addition, certain credit agreements could result in the acceleration of all or a portion of the indebtedness following a sale of assets outside the ordinary course of business. Although CompX has no current expectations to borrow on the revolving credit facility to fund working capital, capital expenditures, debt service or dividends (if declared), lower future operating results could reduce or eliminate the amount available to borrow and restrict future dividends.

NL, CompX and Kronos are each in compliance with all of their respective debt covenants at March 31, 2012. Our and the ability of our affiliates to borrow funds under our credit facilities in the future will, in some instances, depend in part on our ability to comply with specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial covenants contained in the applicable credit agreements. We believe each of NL, CompX and Kronos will be able to comply with its respective financial covenants contained in their credit facilities through the maturity date of the respective facilities; however if future operating results differ materially from our current expectations, we, CompX or Kronos might not be able to maintain compliance.

Future cash requirements

Liquidity

Our primary source of liquidity on an ongoing basis is our cash flow from operating activities and credit facilities with affiliates and banks as further discussed below. We generally use these amounts to (i) fund capital expenditures (substantially all of which relate to CompX), (ii) pay ongoing environmental remediation and legal expenses and (iii) provide for the payment of debt service and dividends (if declared).

- 37 -

At March 31, 2012, we had an aggregate of $8.5 million of restricted and unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. A detail by entity is presented in the table below. Substantially all of the $4.2 million aggregate cash and cash equivalents held by CompX was held by its non-U.S. subsidiaries.


	Amount
	(In millions)

CompX	$	4.2
NL Parent and wholly-owned subsidiaries		4.3


Total	$	8.5

In addition, at March 31, 2012 we owned 4.8 million shares of Valhi common stock and 1.4 million shares of TIMET common stock with an aggregate market value of $273.8 million. See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. We also owned 35.2 million shares of Kronos common stock at March 31, 2012 with an aggregate market value of $878.4 million. See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

We routinely compare our liquidity requirements and alternative uses of capital against the estimated future cash flows we expect to receive from our subsidiaries and affiliates. As a result of this process, we have in the past and may in the future seek to raise additional capital, incur debt, repurchase indebtedness in the market or otherwise, modify our dividend policies, consider the sale of our interests in our subsidiaries, affiliates, business, marketable securities or other assets, or take a combination of these and other steps, to increase liquidity, reduce indebtedness and fund future activities. Such activities have in the past and may in the future involve related companies.

We periodically evaluate acquisitions of interests in or combinations with companies (including related companies) perceived by management to be undervalued in the marketplace. These companies may or may not be engaged in businesses related to our current businesses. We intend to consider such acquisition activities in the future and, in connection with this activity, may consider issuing additional equity securities and increasing indebtedness. From time to time, we also evaluate the restructuring of ownership interests among our respective subsidiaries and related companies.

Based upon our expectations of our operating performance, and the anticipated demands on our cash resources we expect to have sufficient liquidity to meet our short-term obligations (defined as the twelve-month period ending March 31, 2013). If actual developments differ from our expectations, our liquidity could be adversely affected. In this regard, Valhi has agreed to loan us up to $40 million on a revolving basis. At March 31, 2012 we had $6.5 million outstanding on the note with Valhi with a borrowing availability of $33.5 million. The amount of any such outstanding loan Valhi would make to us is at Valhi’s discretion. In addition, CompX had an outstanding balance of $2.0 million on its revolving credit facility with a borrowing availability of $28.0 million and CompX could borrow all such available balance without violating any debt covenants. See Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Capital Expenditures

Firm purchase commitments for capital projects in process at March 31, 2012 approximated $910,000. CompX’s 2012 capital investments are limited to those expenditures required to meet expected customer demand and those required to properly maintain its facilities.

- 38 -

Dividends

Because our operations are conducted primarily through subsidiaries and affiliates, our long-term ability to meet parent company-level corporate obligations is largely dependent on the receipt of dividends or other distributions from our subsidiaries and affiliates. A detail of annual dividends we would expect to receive from our subsidiaries and affiliates in 2012, based on the number of shares of common stock we own for these subsidiaries and affiliates at March 31, 2012 and their current regular quarterly dividend rate, is presented in the table below.


	Shares held at March 31, 2012 (in millions)		Quarterly Dividend Rate		Annual Expected Dividend
					(in millions)
Kronos		35.2	$	.15	$	21.1
CompX		10.8		.125		5.4
Valhi		4.8		.125		2.4
TIMET		1.4		.075		.4


Total expected annual dividends					$	29.3

Investments in our subsidiaries and affiliates and other acquisitions

We have in the past and may in the future purchase the securities of our subsidiaries and affiliates or third-parties in market or privately-negotiated transactions. We base our purchase decisions on a variety of factors, including an analysis of the optimal use of our capital, taking into account the market value of the securities and the relative value of expected returns on alternative investments. In connection with these activities, we may consider issuing additional equity securities or increasing our indebtedness. We may also evaluate the restructuring of ownership interests of our businesses among our subsidiaries and related companies.

Off-balance sheet financing arrangements

Other than operating lease commitments discussed in our 2011 Annual Report, we are not party to any material off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Commitments and contingencies

We are subject to certain commitments and contingencies, as more fully described in Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements or in Part I, Item 3 of this report. In addition to those legal proceedings described in Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, various legislation and administrative regulations have, from time to time, been proposed that seek to (i) impose various obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigment and lead-based paint (including us) with respect to asserted health concerns associated with the use of such products and (ii) effectively overturn court decisions in which we and other pigment manufacturers have been successful. Examples of such proposed legislation include bills which would permit civil liability for damages on the basis of market share, rather than requiring plaintiffs to prove that the defendant’s product caused the alleged damage and bills which would revive actions barred by the statute of limitations. While no legislation or regulations have been enacted to date that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity, enactment of such legislation could have such an effect.

Recent accounting pronouncements

See Note 14 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 39 -

Critical accounting policies and estimates

For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to Part I, Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2011 Annual Report. There have been no changes in our critical accounting policies during the first three months of 2012.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risk, including currency exchange rates, interest rates and security prices. There have been no material changes in these market risks since we filed our 2011 Annual Report, and we refer you to Part I, Item 7A. – “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk” in our 2011 Annual Report. See also Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures – We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit to the SEC under the Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions to be made regarding required disclosure. Each of Harold C. Simmons, our Chief Executive Officer, and Gregory M. Swalwell, our Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2012. Based upon their evaluation, these executive officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2012.

Internal control over financial reporting – We also maintain internal control over financial reporting. The term “internal control over financial reporting,” as defined by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), means a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:

•

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of our assets;

•

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors and

•

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of an unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

As permitted by the SEC, our assessment of internal control over financial reporting excludes (i) internal control over financial reporting of equity method investees and (ii) internal control over the preparation of our

- 40 -

financial statement schedules required by Article 12 of Regulation S-X. However, our assessment of internal control over financial reporting with respect to equity method investees did include our controls over the recording of amounts related to our investment that are recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, including controls over the selection of accounting methods for our investments, the recognition of equity method earnings and losses and the determination, valuation and recording of our investment account balances.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting – There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

- 41 -

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

In addition to the matters discussed below, refer to Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and to our 2011 Annual Report.

Lewis, et al. v. Lead Industries Association, et al. (Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, County Department, Chancery Division, Case No. 00CH09800). In March 2012, the trial court judge decertified the class.

Raritan Bay Slag Site, Old Bridge Township and the Borough of Sayreville, Middlesex County, New Jersey. In February 2012, NL received a Demand for Reimbursement of Costs from USEPA in connection with the Raritan Bay Slag Superfund Site.

United States and Nebraska v. NL Industries, Inc., Civil Action No.8:12-cv-00059. In March 2012, the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska entered the Consent Decree. This concludes the case.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

For a discussion of the risk factors related to our businesses, refer to Part I, Item 1A., “Risk Factors,” in our 2011 Annual Report. There have been no material changes to such risk factors during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Item 6.

Exhibits



31.1		Certification

31.2		Certification

32.1		Certification

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

- 42 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date: May 8, 2012		/s/ Gregory M. Swalwell
		Gregory M. Swalwell
		(Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer)

Date: May 8, 2012		/s/ Tim C. Hafer
		Tim C. Hafer
		(Vice President and Controller, Principal Accounting Officer)

- 43 -