OptimizeRx Corp - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

OptimizeRx Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days [X] Yes    [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes [ ]   No [X]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 13,969,202 shares as of June 30, 2011.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.     Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are as follows:

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the SEC instructions to Form 10-Q.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the interim period ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the full year.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF JUNE 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

 OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

1.      NATURE OF BUSINESS

Optimizer Systems, LLC was formed in the State of Michigan on January 31, 2006. It then became a corporation in the State of Michigan on October 22, 2007 and changed its name to OptimizeRx Corporation. On April 14, 2008, RFID, Ltd., a Colorado corporation, consummated a reverse merger by entering into a share exchange agreement with the stockholders of OptimizeRx Corporation, pursuant to which the stockholders of OptimizeRx Corporation exchanged all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of OptimizeRx Corporation for 1,256,958 shares of common stock of RFID, Ltd., representing 100% of the outstanding capital stock of RFID, Ltd. As of April 30, 2008, RFID’s officers and directors resigned their positions and RFID changed its business to OptimizeRx’s business. On April 15, 2008, RFID, Ltd.’s corporate name was changed to OptimizeRx Corporation. On September 4, 2008, a migratory merger was completed, thereby changing the state of incorporation from Colorado to Nevada, resulting in the current corporate structure, in which OptimizeRx Corporation, a Nevada corporation, is the parent corporation, and OptimizeRx Corporation, a Michigan corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary (together, "OptimizeRx" and "the Company").

The wholly-owned subsidiary, OptimizeRx Corporation, is a technology solutions company targeting the health care industry. Their objective is to bring better access to better care through connecting patients, physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers through technology. Once defined as a marketing and advertising company through its consumer website, OptimizeRx is maturing as a technology solutions provider as it launched its direct to physician solution, SampleMD. SampleMD allows physicians to search, print and send available sample trial vouchers and/or co-pay coupons on behalf of their patients. The SampleMD solution can either sit on the doctor’s desktop or can be integrated into the ePrescribing or Electronic Medical Records applications. OptimizeRx solutions provide pharmaceutical manufacturers either a direct to consumer and/or direct to physician channels for communicating and promoting their products. It provides health care providers a means to provide sampling and coupons without having to physically store samples on site, and it provides better access and affordability to the patients.

2.      SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC as of and for the period ended December 31, 2010. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for the financial statements to be not misleading for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Accounting Basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” accounting). The Company has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end.

Principles of Consolidation

The financial statements reflect the consolidated results of OptimizeRx Corporation (a Nevada corporation) and its wholly owned subsidiary OptimizeRx Corporation (a Michigan corporation). All material inter-company transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

2.      SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Reclassifications

Certain accounts and financial statement captions in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the accompanying financial statements, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates the carrying amount of these financial instruments due to their short-term nature. The fair value of long-term debt, which approximates its carrying value, is based on current rates at which the Company could borrow funds with similar remaining maturities.

Property and Equipment

The capital assets are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives, three to seven years using the straight-line method of depreciation for book purposes.

Revenue Recognition

All revenue is recognized when it is earned. Revenues are generated either through the Company’s website activities, in which we earn revenue from advertising and lead generation activities, or from our SampleMD activities, which include offering setup within the systems and our offers, coupons, and vouchers that enable our customers to save money on medical products and services. The Company’s processes are monitored by third parties who collect revenues from clients on a per activity basis and report and forward the revenue to the Company’s account.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

Concentration of Credit Risks

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts; however, amounts in excess of the federally insured limit may be at risk if the bank experiences financial difficulties.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions have been made in determining the depreciable lives of such assets and the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

2.      SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Research and Development

The Company’s key members are part of a continual research development team and monitor new technologies, trends, services and partnerships that can provide the Company with additional services, value to healthcare and pharmaceutical industries and to the patients it serves.

The Company seeks to educate team members through understanding of all market dynamics that have the potential to affect the business both short term and longer term. The primary goal is to help patients better afford and access the medicines their doctor prescribes, as well as other healthcare products and services they need. Based on this, the Company continually seeks better ways to meet this mission through technology, better user experiences and new ways to engage industries to provide new support for patients needing their products. The Company is always seeking new services and solutions to offer. At this time, the three current platforms provide robust opportunities and growth during the next five years.

Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

The computation of basic earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The computation of diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year plus common stock equivalents which would arise from the exercise of warrants outstanding using the treasury stock method and the average market price per share during the year. Options warrants and convertible preferred stock which are common stock equivalents are not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation for June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, since their effect is anti-dilutive.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

3.      PREPAID EXPENSES

Prepaid expenses consisted of the following as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

4.      PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The Company owned equipment recorded at cost which consisted of the following as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Depreciation expense was $904 and $844 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

5.      WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS

The Company has capitalized costs in developing their website and web-based products, which consisted of the following as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

The Company began amortizing the OptimizeRx website costs, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 5 years, once it was put into service in December of 2007. During the year end December 31, 2009, the Company began a new web-based project and the related programming and development costs have been capitalized for the SampleMD website. The project was completed in mid-December 2010 and no amortization was recorded in 2010. Amortization began on the straight-line method in January 2011 over the period of five years. Although the Project was completed in mid-December, the Company continues to enhance and upgrade the website. Monthly payments for these upgrades have been capitalized, but not amortized, as of June 30, 2011. The Company determined that the original OptimizeRx website was no longer useful so the remaining unamortized balance of $59,083 was impaired as of December 31, 2010. Amortization expense was $31,841 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $30,827 for the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

6.      PATENT RIGHTS AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

On April 26, 2010, the Company acquired from an officer and shareholder the technical contributions and assignment of all exclusive rights to and for the SampleMD patent currently in process in exchange for 300,000 shares of common stock to be granted at the discretion of the seller in addition to 200,000 stock options valued at $360,000. The shares were valued on the grant date at $570,000 and have been recorded as a payable to the related party.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

6.      PATENT RIGHTS AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (CONTINUED)

The Company has capitalized costs in purchasing the SampleMD patent, which consisted of the following as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

The Company began amortizing the patent, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 17 years, once it was put into service in July 2010. Amortization expense was $27,353 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $27,353 for the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

7.      ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

8.      DEFERRED REVENUE

The Company has signed several contracts with customers for coupon redemptions on their website. The payments are not taken into revenue until the end user redeems the coupon. The redemptions are tracked via their website and revenues are recorded as the coupons are redeemed. Deferred revenue was $152,610 and $225,720 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

9.      NOTE PAYABLE

On October 5, 2010, the Company issued a secured promissory note of $1,000,000 to an investor. The note accrues interest at 6% per annum, compounded on April and October each year and will be paid at the earliest of September 12, 2012 or earlier at the Company’s option. No principal or interest payments are required until the maturity date. Accrued interest was $15,000 as of December 31, 2010. The terms of the note also granted 1,000,000 stock warrants and 1,000,000 contingent stock warrants in connection with the financing. The non-contingent warrants were valued at $1,007,992 with $1,000,000 recorded as debt discount and $7,992 recorded as interest expense in the December 31, 2010 year. The Company analyzed the assumptions associated with the contingent warrants and determined that the performance objectives were not likely to occur in 2011. Therefore, no value was recorded for the contingent warrants. The debt discount derived from the warrant valuation of $1,000,000 will be amortized over the life of the loan using the straight-line method and charged to interest expense. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $333,333 and $83,333, respectively, had been amortized with the remaining balance of $666,667 at June 30, 2011 to be amortized through October 5, 2012.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

10.  COMMON STOCK

OptimizeRx Corporation has 500,000,000 shares of $.001 par value common stock authorized as of December 31, 2010. There were 13,869,202 and 13,606,676 common shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

On March 11, 2010, the Company issued 12,000 shares of common stock for services valued at $27,960.

On April 20, 2010, the Company issued 66,000 shares to board members for services valued at $130,680.

Additionally on May 27, 2010, the Company issued 25,000 for services valued at $42,500.

On September 27, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for services valued at $100,000.

On October 14, 2010, the Company issued 24,000 shares to a board member or advisory services valued at $30,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued 410,520 shares of common stock to satisfy $700,000 of preferred dividends.

On February 19, 2010, 75,400 stock warrants were exercised for 43,039 shares of common stock in a cashless exchange.

On May 19, 2010, 25,000 stock warrants were exercised for 25,000 shares of common stock for total proceeds of $8,750.

On April 26, 2010, the Company acquired from an officer and shareholder the technical contributions and assignment of all exclusive rights to and for the SampleMD patent currently in process in exchange for 300,000 shares of common stock to be granted at the discretion of the seller in addition to 200,000 stock options valued at $360,000. The shares were valued on the grant date at $570,000 and have been recorded as a payable to the related party.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 252,526 shares of common stock to satisfy $250,000 of preferred dividends.

On June 30, 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Midtown Partners.  Under the settlement agreement, the Company will pay Midtown Partners $57,500 and grant 100,000 shares of its common stock.  The cost of the settlement has been recorded as equity issuance costs. As a result of the settlement, the litigation in the Eastern District of Michigan will be dismissed. 

11.  PREFERRED STOCK

Series A Preferred

During the year ended December 31, 2008, 35 preferred shares were issued for $3,500,000. Issuance costs totaled $515,000 resulting in net proceeds of $2,985,000. The 35 shares are convertible to 3,500,000 shares of common stock and bear a 10% cumulative dividend. In addition, there was a warrant issued to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2 for a period of seven years.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

11.  PREFERRED STOCK (CONTINUED)

The holders of the preferred stock are entitled to semi-annual dividends payable on the stated value of the Series A preferred stock at a rate of 10% per annum, which shall be cumulative, and accrue daily from the issuance date. The dividends may be paid in cash or shares of the Company's common stock at management’s discretion. If after the conversion eligibility date, the market price for the common stock for any ten consecutive trading days in which the stock trades for over $2 per share and trading exceeds 100,000 shares per day, the preferred shareholders can be required to convert their shares to common stock. Each share of Series A preferred stock shall also be convertible at the option of the holder into that number of shares of common stock of the Company at the stated value of such share at a $1 conversion price.

The holder may cause this conversion at the time the shares are eligible for resale by the holder. The conversion price is subject to adjustment as hereinafter provided, at any time, or from time to time upon the terms and in the manner hereinafter set forth in the shareholder agreement. There is no conversion expiration date, however, the holder must provide 30 days notice for the registration of the conversion.

On May 12, 2010, the Company’s Board declared and issued 236,598 common shares as payment for all cumulative and current semi-annual dividends. On November 16, 2010, the Company’s Board declared and issued 173,922 common shares for its semi-annual dividend payment. On March 25, 2011, the Company’s Board declared and issued 176,768 common shares for its semi-annual dividend payment.

Series B Preferred

During the year ended December 31, 2010, 15 preferred shares were issued for $1,500,000. The 15 shares are convertible to 1,500,000 shares of common stock and bear a 10% cumulative dividend. In addition, there was a warrant issued to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3 for a period of seven years.

The preferred stock was issued for $1,500,000 less associated issuance costs of $350,000 for net proceeds of $1,150,000. Additionally, 3,000,000 common stock warrants were issued with the preferred stock. Based on the fair values of the preferred stock and common stock warrants on the issue date, $341,100 was allocated to preferred stock and $1,158,900 was allocated to the common stock warrants. Equity issuance costs of $350,000 were allocated to the preferred stock.

Series B Preferred

The holders of the preferred stock are entitled to semi-annual dividends payable on the stated value of the Series B preferred stock at a rate of 10% per annum, which shall be cumulative, and accrue daily from the issuance date. The dividends may be paid in cash or shares of the Company's common stock at management’s discretion. If after the conversion eligibility date, the market price for the common stock for any ten consecutive trading days in which the stock trades for over $2 per share and trading exceeds 100,000 shares per day, the preferred shareholders can be required to convert their shares to common stock. Each share of Series B preferred stock shall also be convertible at the option of the holder into that number of shares of common stock of the Company at the stated value of such share at a $1.50 conversion price.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

11.  PREFERRED STOCK (CONTINUED)

The holder may cause this conversion at the time the shares are eligible for resale by the holder. The conversion price is subject to adjustment as hereinafter provided, at any time, or from time to time upon the terms and in the manner hereinafter set forth in the shareholder agreement. On March 25, 2011, the Company’s Board declared and issued 75,758 common shares for its semi-annual dividend payment.

In the event the Company has added at least 1,750 active physicians to the system, and added 35 brands, the Company may issue and sell at its option, and the Purchaser agrees to purchase, up to 15 shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock at a subsequent date, provided that the date cannot occur earlier than November 1, 2010. If the conditions have not been fulfilled prior to June 30, 2011, the Purchaser shall have no obligation to purchase any securities from the Company.

12.  STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of ASC Topic 718: Compensation - Stock Compensation, which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.

The Company follows ASC Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods and Services,” for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees. In accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

On January 6, 2010, the Company issued 25,000 stock warrants for services to a consultant with an exercise price of $0.35. The warrants were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 259%, risk-free interest rate of 2.6% and expected life of 60 months. The Company recognized consulting expense of $57,425.

On June 4, 2010, the Company issued 3,000,000 stock warrants in connection with the preferred stock issuance with an exercise price of $3.00. The warrants were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 260%, risk-free interest rate of 2.65% and expected life of 84 months. The Company recorded the stock warrants valued at $5,096,472 in an equity transaction.

On July 1, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 stock warrants for services to a consultant with an exercise price of $2.50. The warrants were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 241%, risk-free interest rate of 1.26% and expected life of 60 months. The Company recognized consulting expense of $129,000.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

12.        STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (CONTINUED)

On October 5, 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 stock warrants and 1,000,000 contingent stock warrants in connection with the Company’s debt financing with an exercise price of $2.25. The warrants were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 241%, risk-free interest rate of 1.83% and expected life of 84 months. The non-contingent warrants were valued at $1,007,992 with $1,000,000 recorded as debt discount and $7,992 recorded as interest expense in the current period. The company analyzed the assumptions associated with the contingent warrants and determined that the performance objectives were not likely to occur in 2011. Therefore, no value was recorded for the contingent warrants. The Company recorded $250,000 and $83,333 of the debt discount as interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 with the remaining balance of $666,667 to be amortized over the remaining term of the loan. See Note 9.

On April 26, 2010, the Company issued 200,000 stock options to acquire from an officer and shareholder the technical contributions and assignment of all exclusive rights to and for the SampleMD patent currently in process in exchange for 300,000 shares of common stock to be granted at the discretion of the seller in addition to 200,000 stock options with an exercise price of $1.81. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 262%, risk-free interest rate of 2.54% and expected life of 60 months. The Company capitalized $360,000 as patent rights for these options.

On October 1, 2010, the Company issued 25,000 stock options to an employee with a vesting period of one year and an exercise price of $1.21. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 241%, risk-free interest rate of 1.26% and expected life of 60 months. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $6,203 during the year ended December 31, 2010 with the remaining balance of $18,610 to be recognized in 2011. $6,203 has been recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2011.

On April 27, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 stock options to an individual at an exercise price of $0.73. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 221%, risk-free interest rate of 2.06% and expected life of 60 months. The agreement is for a period of six months. The Company recognized expenses of $27,717 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 with the remaining balance of $66,275 recorded as prepaid consulting to be expensed over the next four months.

On May 31, 2011, the Company issued 285,000 stock options to 3 employees at an exercise price of $1.00. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 218%, risk-free interest rate of 1.68% and expected life of 60 months. The total value of the options was $320,585. The options vest over one year. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $26,715 during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The remaining balance will be recognized over the following eleven months.

13.        COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company leases their offices for $2,500 a month on a month-to-month rental.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

14.        RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company acquired from an officer and shareholder the technical contributions and assignment of all exclusive rights to and for the SampleMD patent currently in process in exchange for 300,000 shares of common stock to be granted at the discretion of the seller in addition to 200,000 stock options valued at $360,000. The shares were valued on the grant date at $570,000 and have been recorded as a payable to the related party. See Notes 6, 10 and 12.

15.        MAJOR CUSTOMERS

The Company has one major customer that accounted for 50% of the Company’s revenues and has two major customers that accounted for approximately 55% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company expects to continue to maintain these relationships with the customers.

16.        INCOME TAXES

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $648,000 and therefore has no tax liability. The Company began operations in 2007 and has previous net operating loss carry-forwards of $11,359,000 through December 31, 2010. The cumulative loss of $12,007,000 will be carried forward and can be used through the year 2031 to offset future taxable income. In the future, the cumulative net operating loss carry-forward for income tax purposes may differ from the cumulative financial statement loss due to timing differences between book and tax reporting.

The provision for Federal income tax consists of the following for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $12,007,000 for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

17.  OPERATING EXPENSES

Operating expenses consisted of the following for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

18.  GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has sustained substantial losses from operations.

In view of this matter, the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon growth of revenues and the ability of the Company to raise additional capital. Management believes that its successful ability to raise capital and their plans for increases in revenues will provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

19.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In accordance with ASC 855-10, the Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to June 30, 2011 through August 10, 2011 and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these financial statements.

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions.  We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions.  Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.  Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Overview

We have worked diligently to build our SampleMD™ solution which provides the ability to search and select free sample vouchers and co-pay assistance by prescribing clinicians on behalf of their patents. We installed the SampleMD™ solution within our first health system in November of 2010. In parallel to our efforts of providing the doctors desktop version of the SampleMD™ solution to health systems that have eliminated access to pharmaceutical representatives, we have also worked with Allscripts to integrate its solution right within their electronic prescribing application. The Allscripts ePrescribe solution was launched in mid December of 2010. These launches where inclusive of those handful of early adopting pharmaceutical manufacturers which saw the benefits and potentials of this new channel in reaching prescribing clinicians that prior where inaccessible.

With the completed launch of SampleMD™ to various health systems and within the Allscripts solutions, we began 2011 with two major focuses. First, we set out to improve the field functionality and adoption by prescribing clinicians of our SampleMD™ solution. Early feedback from prescribing clinicians was positive. Overall, for both installed environments, desk top and eRx, clinicians were satisfied with the ease and availability of our SampleMD^TM solution. With the feedback we received, we continued to enhance and update product ease, usability and speed. We project that our SampleMD™ 3.0 will feature components with easier access to formulary information, broader search capabilities and a scheduler for pharmaceutical representatives. Additionally, SampleMD™ will be integrated not only within ePrescribing environments, but also within Electronic Medical (EMR) and Electronic Health Record (EHR) environments – right within the clinicians work stream.

Our second focus was to evaluate market trends and consumer demands to adjust our market message and product performance and pricing. With increasing demand for our product, we have adjusted our pricing and have been aggressively selling and positioning within the market. At the end of the first six months of 2011, our portfolio consists of nine (9) major pharmaceutical manufacturers, forty (40) brands and over fifty-three (53) offerings, with commitments from other major manufacturers to integrate their brand within the SampleMD™ solution. All of this has been reflective in seeing revenues generated from setups, redemptions and print activity. We have, and intend to continue to, acquire additional resources to assist in positioning and securing new sales and recruiting new channel partners for integration of our solution.

Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

Revenues

Our total revenue reported for three months ended June 30, 2011 was $200,174, an increase from $16,720 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Our total revenue reported for six months ended June 30, 2011 was $594,017, an increase from $18,003 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Our increased revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the prior year periods is a result of our SampleMD solution and the setup and integration fees for pharmaceutical manufacturers which are participating within this offering. We are in the process of extending and renewing existing contracts, solidifying new contracts, and broadening our distribution channel with leading e-prescribers and electronic medical record providers. We expect that these efforts will result in larger revenues for our third quarter.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased to $493,154 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $892,083 for the same period ended 2010. Operating expenses decreased to $962,435 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $1,155,177 for the same period ended 2010. A detail of the significant expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the prior year period is set forth below:

Our operating expenses have decreased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the prior year periods largely as a result of a decrease in stock-based compensation, which is included in the category for “consulting” expenses. Professional fees and salaries wages and benefits, however, are all higher in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the prior year periods as a result of ramping up operations, as we have transformed from a development stage company to an operating company. For the third quarter, we expect to have higher operating expenses as we bring on account manager and sales positions.

Other Income/Expenses

Other expenses were $139,703 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with other income of $460 for same period ended 2010.  Other expenses were $279,197 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with other income of $1,304 for same period ended 2010.  Interest expenses were the major factor for other expenses for the periods ended June 30, 2011.

Net Loss

Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $432,683, compared to net loss of $874,903 for the same period 2010. Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $647,615, compared to net loss of $1,135,870 for the same period 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2011, we had total current assets of $1,724,728 and total assets in the amount of $3,161,960. Our total current liabilities as of June 30, 2011 were $862,570.  We had working capital of $862,158 as of June 30, 2011.

Operating activities used $225,479 in cash for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our net loss of $647,615, deferred revenue of $73,110 and prepaid expenses of $34,813 were the primary components of our negative operating cash flow, offset mainly by $250,000 in amortization of debt discount, $85,900 in accounts receivable, $83,992 in stock issued for services, and $60,100 in depreciation and amortization. Investing activities used $82,850 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as a result of website development costs.  Financing activities provided $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

As of June 30, 2011, with the current level of financing and cash on hand, we have sufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the next twelve months but insufficient cash to achieve our business goals unless we: a) realize cash revenues on sales generated; b) meet the milestones as defined in the second round of financing with Vicis Capital Master Fund, a sub-trust of Vicis Capital Series Master Trust, a unit trust organized and existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands (“Vicis”) and satisfy the conditions to secure the second tranche of funding; and/or c) obtain additional financing through debt and/or equity based financing arrangements which may be insufficient to fund our capital expenditures, working capital, or other cash requirements. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2011, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4T.     Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2011.  This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. David Lester.  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.  There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect such controls.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the internal control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

Aside from the following, we are not a party to any pending legal proceeding, and we are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

On February 10, 2011, we commenced an action against Beringea, LLC (“Beringea”) in the Circuit Court for the County of Oakland in the State of Michigan. The action is based on a dispute between our company and Beringea surrounding a capital raising agreement that was entered into on October 15, 2009. We have alleged that Beringea has failed to perform under the agreement, misinformed us about “tail” liability, and is wrongfully withholding funds due to us. We are seeking $400,000 in damages.

On August 18, 2010, we commenced an action against Midtown Partners & Co., LLC (“Midtwon Partners”) in the Circuit Court for the County of Oakland in the State of Michigan. The action is based on a dispute between our company and Midtown Partners surrounding a placement agent agreement that was entered into on June 27, 2008. We filed the action seeking declaratory relief that no compensation is due and owing to Midtown Partners in connection with an investment made by on June 4, 2010.

Midtown Partners removed the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. On June 30, 2011 , we entered into a settlement agreement with Midtown Partners. Under the settlement agreement, we paid Midtown Partners $57,500 and issued the company 100,000 shares of our common stock. As a result of the settlement, the litigation in the Eastern District of Michigan will be dismissed.

Item 1A:  Risk Factors

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the current reporting period, we issued the following securities:

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued 252,526 shares of common stock to satisfy $250,000 of preferred dividends to Vicis.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued options to purchase 285,000 shares of our common stock to our directors at an exercise price of $1.00.

On June 30, 2011, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in connection with a settlement of our dispute with Midtown Partners.

These issuances were deemed to be exempt under rule 506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering, the investors were accredited investors and / or qualified institutional buyers, the investors had access to information about the Company and their investment, the investors took the securities for investment and not resale, and the Company took appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the securities.

Item 3.     Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.     Removed and Reserved

Item 5.     Other Information

None

Item 6.      Exhibits 

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.