OptimizeRx Corp - Quarter Report: 2014 March (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

OptimizeRx Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 23,580,863 common shares as of May 12, 2014

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are as follows:

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the SEC instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the full year.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
AS OF MARCH 31, 2014 15

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 AND 2013

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 AND 2013

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS

Optimizer Systems, LLC was formed in the State of Michigan on January 31, 2006. It then became a corporation in the State of Michigan on October 22, 2007 and changed its name to OptimizeRx Corporation. On April 14, 2008, RFID, Ltd., a Colorado corporation, consummated a reverse merger by entering into a share exchange agreement with the stockholders of OptimizeRx Corporation, pursuant to which the stockholders of OptimizeRx Corporation exchanged all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of OptimizeRx Corporation for 1,256,958 shares of common stock of RFID, Ltd., representing 100% of the outstanding capital stock of RFID, Ltd. As of April 30, 2008, RFID’s officers and directors resigned their positions and RFID changed its business to OptimizeRx’s business. On April 15, 2008, RFID, Ltd.’s corporate name was changed to OptimizeRx Corporation. On September 4, 2008, a migratory merger was completed, thereby changing the state of incorporation from Colorado to Nevada, resulting in the current corporate structure, in which OptimizeRx Corporation, a Nevada corporation, is the parent corporation, and OptimizeRx Corporation, a Michigan corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary (together, "OptimizeRx" and "the Company").

The wholly-owned subsidiary, OptimizeRx Corporation, is a technology solutions company targeting the health care industry. Their objective is to bring better access to better care through connecting patients, physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers through technology. Once defined as a marketing and advertising company through its consumer website, OptimizeRx is maturing as a technology solutions provider as it launched its direct to physician solution, SampleMD. SampleMD allows physicians to search, print and send available sample trial vouchers and/or co-pay coupons on behalf of their patients. The SampleMD solution can either sit on the doctor’s desktop or can be integrated into the ePrescribing or Electronic Medical Records applications. OptimizeRx solutions provide pharmaceutical manufacturers either a direct to consumer and/or direct to physician channels for communicating and promoting their products. It provides health care providers a means to provide sampling and coupons without having to physically store samples on site, and it provides better access and affordability to the patients.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for the financial statements to be not misleading for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Accounting Basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” accounting). The Company has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end.

Principles of Consolidation

The financial statements reflect the consolidated results of OptimizeRx Corporation (a Nevada corporation) and its wholly owned subsidiary OptimizeRx Corporation (a Michigan corporation). All material inter-company transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the accompanying financial statements, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, patent rights, web development costs, accounts payable, accounts payable – related party, accrued expenses and deferred revenue approximates the carrying amount of these financial instruments due to their short-term nature. The fair value of long-term debt, which approximates its carrying value, is based on current rates at which the Company could borrow funds with similar remaining maturities.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk including our own credit risk.

In addition to defining fair value, the disclosure requirements around fair value establish a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs which is expanded. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:

Level 1 – inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2 – inputs are based upon significant observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. The Company’s stock options and warrants are valued using level 3 inputs.

The carrying value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities which consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, patent rights, web development costs, security deposit, accounts payable, accounts payable – related party, accrued expenses, revenue share payable and deferred revenue are valued using level 1 inputs. The Company believes that the recorded values approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of such instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, exchange or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are reported at realizable value, net of allowances for doubtful accounts, which is estimated and recorded in the period the related revenue is recorded. The Company has a standardized approach to estimate and review the collectability of its receivables based on a number of factors, including the period they have been outstanding. Historical collection and payer reimbursement experience is an integral part of the estimation process related to allowances for doubtful accounts. In addition, the Company regularly assesses the state of its billing operations in order to identify issues, which may impact the collectability of these receivables or reserve estimates. Bad debt expense was $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Property and Equipment

The capital assets are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives, three to seven years using the straight-line method of depreciation for book purposes.

Revenue Recognition and Revenue Share Expense

All revenue is recognized when it is earned. Revenues are generated either through the Company’s web-based activities, in which we earn revenue from advertising and lead generation activities, from our SampleMD activities by which we deliver eCoupons and eVouchers through a distribution network of ePrescribers and Electronic Health Record technology providers (channel partners), or from reselling services for other of our partners products that complement our business.

For our SampleMD business the company recognizes setup fees that are required for integrating client offerings and campaigns into the SampleMD content delivery system and network. Setup fees are recognized upon completion of the setup and launch of the client’s campaign within the SampleMD system. As the eCoupons and or eVouchers are distributed through the SampleMD platform and network of channel partners (a transaction), these transactions are recorded and revenue is recognized. Revenue for transactions can be realized as cost per distribution or cost per redemption depending on the client contract. Additionally, the company also recognizes revenue for providing program performance reporting and maintenance, either by the company directly delivering reports or by providing access to its online reporting portal that the client can utilize. These fees are administered monthly and recognized as recurring monthly revenue.

The company on occasion has also resold products and or services that are available through our channel partners, and that is complementary to our core businesses and client base. In these events net revenue is recognized as this is a commission based revenue split that the company recognizes.

Based on the volume of transactions that are delivered through our channel partner network, we provide a revenue share to compensate the partner for their promotion of the campaign through their network. Revenue shares are a negotiated percentage of the transaction fee depending upon if the revenue is generated through distributions and or redemptions and can also be specific to special considerations and campaigns. Traditionally, revenue share has been recognized between 25% and 50% of the transaction value.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions have been made in determining the depreciable lives of such assets and the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risks

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts; however, amounts in excess of the federally insured limit may be at risk if the bank experiences financial difficulties.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Research and Development

The Company’s key members are part of a continual research development team and monitor new technologies, trends, services and partnerships that can provide the Company with additional services, value to healthcare and pharmaceutical industries and to the patients it serves.

The Company seeks to educate team members through understanding of all market dynamics that have the potential to affect the business both short term and longer term. The primary goal is to help patients better afford and access the medicines their doctor prescribes, as well as other healthcare products and services they need. Based on this, the Company continually seeks better ways to meet this mission through technology, better user experiences and new ways to engage industries to provide new support for patients needing their products. The Company is always seeking new services and solutions to offer. At this time, the three current platforms provide robust opportunities and growth during the next five years.

Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

The computation of basic earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The computation of diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year plus common stock equivalents which would arise from the exercise of warrants outstanding using the treasury stock method and the average market price per share during the year. Options, warrants and convertible preferred stock which are common stock equivalents are included in the per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2014. They have not been included in the diluted earnings per share calculation for the year ended December 31, 2013 since their effect is anti-dilutive.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

NOTE 3 – PREPAID EXPENSES

Prepaid expenses consisted of the following as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The Company owned equipment recorded at cost which consisted of the following as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Depreciation expense was $1,369 and $1,407 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

NOTE 5 – WEB-BASED TECHNOLOGY

The Company has capitalized costs in developing their web-based technology, which consisted of the following as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Amortization is recorded using the straight-line method over a period of five years. The Company is currently developing enhanced SampleMD web-based technology and has capitalized $224,035, which was completed in March 2014. Accordingly, amortization has been recorded. Amortization expense for the web-based technology costs was $41,907 and $32,572 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

NOTE 6 – PATENT AND TRADEMARKS

On April 26, 2010, the Company acquired from an officer and shareholder the technical contributions and assignment of all exclusive rights to and for the SampleMD patent in exchange for 300,000 shares of common stock to be granted at the discretion of the seller in addition to 200,000 stock options valued at $360,000. The shares were valued on the grant date at $570,000 and have been recorded as a payable to the related party.

The Company has capitalized costs in purchasing and defending the SampleMD patent, which consisted of the following as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 6 – PATENT AND TRADEMARKS (CONTINUED)

The Company began amortizing the patent, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 17 years, once it was put into service in July 2010. In 2013, the Company began incurring costs related to defense of the patent. These costs have been capitalized and will be amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining useful life of the original patent. Amortization expense was $15,630 and $14,132 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

NOTE 7 – ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

NOTE 8 – DEFERRED REVENUE

The Company has signed several contracts with customers for either the distribution or redemption of coupons. The payments are not taken into revenue until either the coupon is distributed to a patient or the coupon has been redeemed depending on the specific contract. The distributions and redemptions are tracked by the Company’s administrative tool. Additionally, customer setup contracts that have been paid in full are deferred until the Company has completed the obligations of the contacts. Deferred revenue was $168,714 and $4,252 as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company acquired from an officer and shareholder the technical contributions and assignment of all exclusive rights to and for the SampleMD patent currently in process in exchange for 300,000 shares of common stock to be granted at the discretion of the seller in addition to 200,000 stock options valued at $360,000. The shares were valued on the grant date at $570,000 and have been recorded as a payable to the related party.

NOTE 10 – COMMON STOCK

OptimizeRx Corporation has 500,000,000 shares of $.001 par value common stock authorized as of March 31, 2014. There were 23,168,337 and 14,773,496 common shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

On June 1, 2013, the Company entered into an amended consulting agreement with North Coast Advisors, Inc. for various services. The Company agreed to issue 20,000 shares of common stock as of the date of the contract. The Company also agreed to issue an additional 20,000 shares every six months in alignment with the agreement renewal up to the two years of the agreement. The first 40,000 shares were valued at the Company’s common stock price as of the date of the contract, which was $1.945/share and $1.50/share, respectively, and have been expensed. The Company has also issued an additional 10,000 shares for work beyond the original scope of the contract in February 2014 valued at $18,500.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 10 – COMMON STOCK (CONTINUED)

On September 20, 2013, the Company entered into a separation agreement that includes post-employment consulting services with a former officer. The Company agreed to issue 500,000 shares of common stock, 250,000 shares immediately and 250,000 by January 1, 2014. The first 250,000 shares have been issued and the Company has recognized the entire issuance in the December 31, 2013 shares outstanding. The shares were valued at $505,000 and $116,538 of that amount remains as deferred stock compensation as of March 31, 2014. Stock-based compensation of $58,270 was recorded in connection with this agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

On January 2, 2014 the Company executed an amendment to their securities redemption option agreement with Vicis Capital Master Fund that provides an option to purchase all of the outstanding shares and derivative securities held by Vicis for a total of $6,000,000. The term of the option is through March 31, 2014. The original agreement payment was for $9,000,000 and term was through December 30, 2013.

On March 17, 2014, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement, pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 8,333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock for $1.20 per share, or gross proceeds of $10,000,000.

Placement agents in the offering received commissions equal to approximately 9.7% of gross proceeds, for an aggregate commission of approximately $970,000, including reimbursements for their reasonable out of pocket expenses. Placement agents also received warrants to purchase up to 804,139 shares of the Company's common stock with an exercise price of $1.20 per share and a term of 5 years. The agent warrants also provide for piggy-back registration rights. The warrants were valued at $1,110,211 and have been recorded as equity issuance costs.

In addition to the warrants, the Company also issued 200,000 shares to three officers in connection with the equity raise. The stock was valued based on the fair market value on the grant date which was $378,000. The amount has been recorded as equity issuance costs.

The Company used the net proceeds of the offering to exercise the securities redemption option agreement, as amended, with Vicis Capital Master Fund that provides the Company with an option to purchase all of the outstanding shares and derivative securities held by Vicis for total payment of $6,000,000. The shares and derivative securities include the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, Common Stock, and warrants to purchase shares of common stock held by Vicis in the Company. The balance of the net proceeds will be used for working capital purposes.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company granted 337,500 shares of common stock to two employees as bonuses valued at $570,375. As of March 31, 2014, only 50% of the shares had vested. The company recorded the remaining 50% as deferred stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation related to these bonuses was $285,188 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The remainder will be expensed once the other 50% of the shares have vested in August 2014.

On January 29, 2014, an officer exercised 500,000 stock warrants using the cashless exercise feature. In exchange for the 500,000 warrants, 410,348 shares of common stock were issued.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 11 – PREFERRED STOCK

Series A Preferred

During the year ended December 31, 2008, 35 preferred shares were issued for $3,500,000. Issuance costs totaled $515,000 resulting in net proceeds of $2,985,000. The 35 shares were convertible to 3,500,000 shares of common stock and bore a 10% cumulative dividend. In addition, there was a warrant issued to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2 for a period of seven years.

The Company had undeclared dividends that were due in February and September 2012 totaling $350,000 and undeclared dividends of $350,000 that were due in February and September 2013 for a total undeclared amount of $700,000 as of December 31, 2013.

All Series A preferred stock was repurchased as part of the securities buyout by the Company on March 17, 2014 and all undeclared dividends were cancelled. The related warrants were also purchased as part of the buyout.

Series B Preferred

During the year ended December 31, 2010, 15 preferred shares were issued for $1,500,000. The 15 shares were convertible to 1,000,000 shares of common stock and bore a 10% cumulative dividend. In addition, there was a warrant issued to purchase 3,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3 for a period of seven years.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, 15 preferred shares were issued to an investor for $1,500,000. The 15 shares are convertible to 1,000,000 shares of common stock and bear a 10% cumulative dividend. In addition, there was a warrant issued to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3 for a period of seven years.

The Company had undeclared dividends that were due in February and September 2012 totaling $150,000 and undeclared dividends of $150,000 that were due in February and September 2013 for a total undeclared amount of $300,000 as of December 31, 2013.

All Series B preferred stock was repurchased as part of the Vicis securities buyout by the Company on March 17, 2014 and all undeclared dividends were cancelled. The related warrants were also purchased as part of the buyout.

NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of ASC Topic 718: Compensation - Stock Compensation, which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.

The Company follows ASC Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods and Services,” for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees. In accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (CONTINUED)

During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 25,000 stock options to a non-employee at an exercise price of $1.58. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 200%, risk-free interest rate of 0.67% and expected life of 60 months. The total value of the options was $40,007. The options vested over 1 year. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $10,002 during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The remainder was expensed during the rest of 2013.

On October 30, 2013, the Company issued 50,000 stock options to six employees at an exercise price of $1.00. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 171%, risk-free interest rate of 1.30% and expected life of 60 months. The total value of the options was $46,322. The options vest over one year.  The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $7,720 during the year ended December 31, 2013 and $11,581 during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The remaining balance will be recognized during the rest of 2014.

On November 8, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 stock options to two non-employees at an exercise price of $1.00. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 171%, risk-free interest rate of 1.42% and expected life of 60 months. The total value of the options was $70,961. The options vest over 1 year. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $11,827 and $17,740 during the three months ended December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014, respectively. The remaining balance of $41,394 has been recorded as deferred stock compensation and will be recognized during the rest of 2014.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued 267,500 stock options to five employees at exercise prices of $1.54 and $1.82. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 172%, risk-free interest rates of 1.58% and 1.46% and expected life of 60 months. The total value of the options was $423,712. The options vest over one year. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $24,654 during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The remaining balance will be recognized during 2014 and 2015.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued 10,000 stock options to a non-employee at exercise price of $1.85. The options were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 171%, risk-free interest rates of 1.64% and expected life of 60 months. The total value of the options was $16,935. The options vest over six months. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $5,645 during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The remaining balance will be recognized during 2014.

On March 17, 2014, the Company issued 804,139 warrants to two companies at an exercise price of $1.20. The warrants were valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 172%, risk-free interest rate of 1.58% and expected life of 60 months. The Company recognized $1,110,211 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as equity issuance costs related to these warrants.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (CONTINUED)

The Company had the following options outstanding as of March 31, 2014:

The Company had the following warrants outstanding as of March 31, 2014:

NOTE 13 – OPERATING LEASES

The Company signed a lease for new office space on December 1, 2011 at an approximate rent of $5,000 per month. The new offices are in Rochester, Michigan. The lease is for three years with an option to renew for an additional two years at approximately $5,200 per month with six months advance notice to exercise the option. Minimum annual rent is as follows for the initial term of the lease:

NOTE 14 – MAJOR CUSTOMERS

The Company had three major customers that accounted for 44% and three major customers that accounted for 72% of the Company’s revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company expects to continue to maintain these relationships with the customers.

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 15 – INCOME TAXES

For the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company incurred net loss of approximately $653,000 and therefore has no tax liability. The Company began operations in 2007 and has previous net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $13,718,000 through December 31, 2013. The cumulative loss of approximately $14,371,000 will be carried forward and can be used through the year 2033 to offset future taxable income. In the future, the cumulative net operating loss carry-forward for income tax purposes may differ from the cumulative financial statement loss due to timing differences between book and tax reporting.

The provision for Federal income tax consists of the following for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $14,371,000 for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

NOTE 16 – OPERATING EXPENSES

Operating expenses consisted of the following for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:

OPTIMIZERx CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2014

NOTE 17 – RESTATEMENT

During the quarter ended December 31, 2013, the Company corrected an accounting error related to revenue share expenses. The Company will accrue the expense for amounts due, versus when they are paid, for proper matching. The revenue share expense will now reflect the expense associated with the revenue from that particular quarter and year end. The Company will restate quarters 1 - 3 of 2013 as the 2014 quarterly statements are prepared. The full impact of the restatement is reflected in the December 31, 2013 balance sheet.

The restated Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Operations and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is as follows:

NOTE 18 – LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT

On November 5, 2012, LDM Group, LLC (“LDM”) commenced an action against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. The complaint alleged that OptimizeRx infringed on a patent issued on February 21, 2012 in favor of LDM. LDM alleged that its patent is an invention of a method for making available targeted content to a prescription medication patient while the patient is still in the physician’s office. According to LDM, the Company’s Integrated SampleMD uses systems and methods that perform the elements of the LDM patent and, therefore, infringes on its patent.  On February 25, 2013, a Settlement and Patent License Agreement was reached with LDM, and LDM subsequently dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice.  On April 23, 2013, however, LDM reinstituted the patent infringement action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division claiming that OptimizeRx breached the Settlement and Patent License Agreement. The Company continued to vigorously defend the OptimizeRx technology, preparing for litigation, depositions and patent protection while also positioning for legal actions against LDM. On February 28, 2014, a Settlement Agreement was reached with LDM, and the judge dismissed the case with prejudice on March 18, 2014. Per the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company paid a one-time fee of $400,000 and will pay LDM the greater of $0.37 per patient discount distributed by OptimizeRx or 10% of the total revenue earned by OptimizeRx for distribution and redemption of all patent discounts. This amount was included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

NOTE 19 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 12, 2014, the Company hired a new CFO. Per the terms of the employment agreement, the CFO will earn a salary of $125,000 per year and was granted 100,000 stock options as a signing bonus.

In accordance with ASC 855-10, the Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to March 31, 2014 through the date these financial statements were issued and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these financial statements other than the events described above.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions.  We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions.  Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.  Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Overview

Company Highlights within 1^st quarter 2014

We finished the first quarter with revenues of $1,317,347, an increase of 97% over the same period 2013 generating positive net cash of $226,727 from operational activities. However, we had a net loss of $653,315 for the first quarter primarily due to two factors:

Moving forward, we expect growing profitability for the remainder of 2014 based primarily on escalation of revenues. Despite nearly doubling our sales over 1Q 2013, which is generally a slower sales quarter based on finalizing budgets and receiving new annual assets, 1Q 2014 revenues would have been higher based on two important factors:

Both of the above have been resolved. Allscripts has resolved their technical and privacy issues, and is now beginning to roll out activation of SampleMD eCoupon automation unless providers “opt-out.” We anticipate this to have a significant impact on June sales and beyond once this is completed by increasing our reach to another 20,000 physicians.

Novartis’ Alcon has re-activated their program based on confirming through an independent auditing firm an outstanding ROI on SampleMD’s eCoupon promotion. Furthermore, this data was highlighted by Novartis during our corporate sponsorship of the inaugural CBInet Pharmaceutical EHR conference focused on leveraging opportunities for promotional effectiveness and brand awareness. The conference was attended by over 150 pharmaceutical brand and marketing executives and highlighted industry luminaries, panel discussions and client presentations. David Harrell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was a noted Keynote speaker, and many clients and partners cited unsolicited testimonials at the successes they have experienced engaging with us. We will be the lead sponsor for a similar conference in October as requested by many of the pharmaceutical client and partners we engage.

These marketing efforts, along with our expert support team and proven reputation, has enabled us to acquire more manufacturers and brands—including Baush & Lomb and AstraZeneca’s promoted portfolio of leading drugs like Crestor, Seroquel and others. AstraZeneca represents a very important win strategically, too, based on the fact that they were previously utilizing a competitive platform.

Our success of acquiring, integrating and expanding into other promotional EHR/eRx platforms continues to grow as well. We are just launching our first initial brands into eHealthline, as well as will be completing our integration into LDMs network and others.

We also expect to launch our patient savings and support within Quest Care360 by end of June 2014. Quest Diagnostics is the world’s leading provider of diagnostic information servicing approximately half of the physicians and hospitals in the U.S. and touches the lives of approximately 30% of American adults a year.

We are in very productive discussions with other leading EHRs and expect our active network to nearly double by end of year.

With the growth of both our pharmaceutical products and our distribution network, we remain confident that our distributions will double over last year.

To support this growth, we have completed the development and migration of SampleMD 2.0’s on-demand, rule based content delivery platform. The system can now manage up to 1 million rules and return the appropriate content within under 1 second. This allows unsurpassed response time to avoid delays, and the ability to meet the upcoming dramatic scale we expect.

On top of building out our updated software solution, we also updated our infrastructure by replacing and updating our computers in a high availability environment, taking greater precautions for security and building out the architecture to facilitate disaster recovery with a secondary facilitated computer environment. We believe this technology investment will increase performance, simplify integrations, insure availability and protect the investments of our shareholders. 

Other Key Quarterly Events

During the first quarter we also successfully completed a $10 million capital raise and exercised the option to redeem Vicis Capital Master Fund’s holdings in our company. By successfully executing these initiatives we reduced fully diluted shares by approximately 7 million and provided an additional $3 Million in working capital to support the company's growth and eliminated dividend payments and other favorable provisions of Vicis preferred stock.

Additionally, after extensive negotiations, OPTIMIZERx and LDM executed a settlement agreement and filed a stipulation to dismiss the litigation with prejudice on March 17, 2014, which the District Court entered on March 19, 2014. This resolves all patent issues and enables us to promote our eCoupons to their network of up to 100,000 healthcare providers, as well as receive additional revenue share through promotion of their sponsored patient education within our network.

New Chief Financial Officer

Also Mr. Douglas P. Baker is joining the organization as its Chief Financial Officer. Doug brings with him over 23 years of public company experience and joins OPTIMIZERx after serving the last 18 years as CFO and Board Director for a publicly traded technology company in the nanotechnology field. Prior to that, Doug held CFO and Divisional Controller positions at large privately held companies after serving nearly 10 years as a CPA with Plante & Moran.

Doug holds a Bachelors and Masters of Business Administration from the University of Michigan, has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1980, is a member of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants, member of the Michigan Association of Certified Public Accountants and has served on the Board of Directors of Total Health Care, Inc., a nonprofit health maintenance organization since 1987.

Summary

Management remains very excited about our core e-coupon business based on our proven impact and platform partnerships continuing to expand. We are also pleased with our current discussions and recognized value from leading veterinary platform providers whom are interested in partnering to deliver similar automated savings to animal owners—while allowing veterinarian’s to remain competitive in their pharmacy business. We are also exploring other new channels to automate savings which hold high promise and rapid growth.

We expect very significant ramp up the second half of the year as we fully roll out our new channels to expand our promotional reach.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

Revenues

Our total revenue reported for Q1 2014 was $1,317,347, an increase of $648,057 or 97% from Q1 2013.

Our increased revenue for Q1 2014 as compared with Q1 2013 is a result of the continued viability of our SampleMD solution and the setup and integration fees for pharmaceutical manufacturers whom are participating within this offering. The bulk of our revenue for Q1 2014 came mainly from our core SampleMD solutions as opposed to our new consulting business. We expect revenues to increase on our consulting business for the rest of 2014.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses increased to $1,471,958 for Q1 2014 from $733,969 for Q1 2013. Our major expenses for Q1 2014 were stock-based compensation of $421,577, a settlement expense with LDM for $400,000, salaries, wages and benefits of $349,096, professional fees of $92,553, general and administrative expenses of $89,264 and depreciation and amortization of $58,906. In comparison, our major expenses for Q1 2013 were salaries, wages and benefits of $375,071, general and administrative expenses of $218,794, professional fees of $53,098, depreciation and amortization of $48,111, and consulting fees of $20,407.

Our expenses increased in Q1 2014 as compared with Q1 2013 largely as a result of stock based compensation of $421,577 and a one-time settlement expenses of $400,000.

Net Loss

Net loss for Q1 2014 was $653,315, compared to net loss of $224,438, for Q1 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2014, we had total current assets of $5,153,914 and total assets in the amount of $6,515,322. Our total current liabilities as of March 31, 2014 were $1,912,659. We had working capital of $3,241,255 as of March 31, 2014.

Operating activities provided $226,727 in cash for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Our decrease in accounts receivable of $455,585, stock-based compensation of $421,577, an increase in revenue share payable of $395,935, and an increase in deferred revenue of $164,462 were the primary components of our positive operating cash flow, offset mainly by our net loss of $653,315 and a decrease in accrued expenses of $134,042.

Investing activities used $109,272 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 largely as a result of patent rights and website development costs.

Financing activities provided $2,795,032 during the three months ended March 31, 2104. On March 17, 2014, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with accredited investors pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 8,333,333 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, for $1.20 per share, or gross proceeds of $10,000,000. We used $6,000,000 of the proceeds to exercise our option to redeem Vicis Capital Master Fund’s holdings in our company. The balance of the proceeds will be used for working capital. With the financing and cash on hand, we have sufficient cash to operate our business for the next twelve months.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2014, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Our critical accounting policies are set forth in Note 2 to the financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operation, financial position or cash flow.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2014. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the presence of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has identified the following material weaknesses which have caused management to conclude that, as of March 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.

Remediation Plan to Address the Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our company plans to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal controls over financial reporting. During the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we plan to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending December 31, 2014: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting.

On May 12, 2014, we appointed a Chief Financial Officer with 23 years of public company experience. We hope that retaining this executive will assist in the remedial efforts to mitigate our material weaknesses.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Aside from the following, we are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

On February 6, 2013, we filed a Complaint for Patent Infringement against Physicians Interactive Inc., Physicians Interactive Holdings, Inc. and Skyscape.com, in which we allege that one or more of those entities has infringed on United States Patent No. 8,341,015. As of September 30, 2013, the defendants responded denying the assertions made in our Complaint, but no further action has occurred in the case.

We recently learned of an action in New Jersey brought by Milton J. Wilson and the Milton Wilson 2000 Trust. Last November 2013, we were served notice that we would be added as an additional party to the case titled Milton Wilson et al. v. Continental Capital Corporation, C-289-06, in the Superior Court of New Jersey. There is an existing default judgment of roughly $1,000,000 in the case. The Court denied plaintiffs’ request to add us a party to the caption, but allowed plaintiffs to file a motion to add us as a party, which was subsequently granted.

In their complaint, Plaintiffs’ underlying claim alleged that a predecessor of ours, Continental Capital, breached a settlement agreement it entered into with plaintiffs in 2001. We have filed an answer effectively denying the allegations in the complaint against us. Because the settlement agreement had an arbitration clause, we claimed that the lawsuit was improper. We also claimed that service was not perfected against other parties so the default judgment is void. We filed counterclaims against plaintiffs and third-party claims against persons related to plaintiffs. In these claims we allege that plaintiffs and others owned and controlled Continental Capital and wrongfully caused Continental Capital to enter the settlement agreement for no bona fide corporate purpose. To the extent, if any, that we may be liable on the default judgment, therefore, we claim that we should be indemnified by plaintiffs and others.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On January 9, 2014, we awarded 200,000 shares of stock to David Harrell, David Lester and Terry Hamilton from our 2013 Incentive Plan.

On January 29, 2014, David Lester exercised 500,000 stock warrants using the cashless exercise feature. In exchange for the 500,000 warrants, 410,348 shares of common stock were issued.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we issued 10,000 shares to North Coast Advisors, our consultant, for services rendered.

On March 17, 2014, we entered into a securities purchase agreement, pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 8,333,333 shares of our common stock for $1.20 per share, or gross proceeds of $10,000,000.

Placement agents in the offering received commissions equal to approximately 9.7% of gross proceeds, for an aggregate commission of approximately $970,000, including reimbursements for their reasonable out of pocket expenses. Placement agents also received warrants to purchase up to 804,139 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $1.20 per share and a term of 5 years. The agent warrants also provide for piggy-back registration rights.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, we issued 267,500 stock options to five employees at exercise prices of $1.54 and $1.82.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, we issued 10,000 stock options to a non-employee at exercise price of $1.85.

These securities were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The holders represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The investors were given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

N/A

Item 5. Other Information

On May 1, 2014, we awarded cash bonuses and issued shares to the following officers of our company under our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.

Item 6. Exhibits

**Provided herewith

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.