PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the Quarter Ended September 30, 2006
|
Commission
file number 000-29599
|
PATRIOT
NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Connecticut
|
06-1559137
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
900
Bedford Street, Stamford, Connecticut 06901
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(203)
324-7500
(Registrant’s
telephone number)
Check
whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days:
Yes
X
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
Yes ___
No
X
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer:
Large
Accelerated Filer ____ Accelerated Filer ____ Non-Accelerated Filer
X
State
the
number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common
equity, as of the latest practicable date.
Common
stock, $2.00 par value per share, 4,739,494 shares issued and outstanding as
of
the close of business October 31, 2006.
Transitional
Disclosure Format (check one): Yes ___
No
X
Table
of
Contents
Page
|
||
Part
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
3
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
|
|
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
22
|
|
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
33
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
36
|
Part
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
36
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceed
|
42
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
42
|
2
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Consolidated
Financial Statements
PATRIOT
NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
6,494,390
|
$
|
7,220,577
|
|||
Federal
funds sold
|
38,500,000
|
6,500,000
|
|||||
Short
term investments
|
30,249,645
|
2,247,028
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
75,244,035
|
15,967,605
|
|||||
Available
for sale securities (at fair value)
|
68,740,162
|
78,672,068
|
|||||
Federal
Reserve Bank stock
|
1,022,950
|
1,022,300
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock
|
2,727,200
|
1,296,700
|
|||||
Loans
receivable (net of allowance for loan losses: 2006
$5,630,432;
|
|||||||
2005
$4,588,335)
|
455,001,231
|
364,243,777
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
3,202,246
|
2,445,417
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment
|
2,670,878
|
2,474,153
|
|||||
Deferred
tax asset, net
|
2,522,801
|
2,675,595
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
930,091
|
930,091
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
1,763,811
|
913,456
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
613,825,405
|
$
|
470,641,162
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Noninterest
bearing deposits
|
$
|
50,928,672
|
$
|
48,797,389
|
|||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
453,575,146
|
370,277,899
|
|||||
Total
deposits
|
504,503,818
|
419,075,288
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
34,000,000
|
9,000,000
|
|||||
Junior
subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trust
|
8,248,000
|
8,248,000
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
3,743,998
|
2,943,259
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
550,495,816
|
439,266,547
|
|||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock: 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $2 par value: 60,000,000 shares authorized; shares
|
|||||||
issued
and outstanding: 2006 - 4,739,494; 2005 - 3,230,649
|
9,478,988
|
6,461,298
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
49,307,949
|
21,709,224
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
5,397,507
|
4,308,242
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income - net unrealized
|
|||||||
loss
on available for sale securities, net of taxes
|
(854,855
|
)
|
(1,104,149
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
63,329,589
|
31,374,615
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
613,825,405
|
$
|
470,641,162
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
PATRIOT
NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Interest
and Dividend Income
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
8,962,195
|
$
|
5,536,477
|
$
|
24,472,546
|
$
|
15,128,669
|
|||||
Interest
and dividends
|
|||||||||||||
on
investment securities
|
743,068
|
814,647
|
2,290,737
|
2,483,631
|
|||||||||
Interest
on federal funds sold
|
151,591
|
88,134
|
286,255
|
230,460
|
|||||||||
Total
interest and dividend income
|
9,856,854
|
6,439,258
|
27,049,538
|
17,842,760
|
|||||||||
Interest
Expense
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
on deposits
|
4,152,620
|
2,514,851
|
10,834,245
|
6,543,197
|
|||||||||
Interest
on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
491,319
|
80,024
|
1,099,124
|
303,485
|
|||||||||
Interest
on subordinated debt
|
177,013
|
136,924
|
497,680
|
380,267
|
|||||||||
Interest
on other borrowings
|
648
|
1,312
|
4,798
|
1,312
|
|||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
4,821,600
|
2,733,111
|
12,435,847
|
7,228,261
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
5,035,254
|
3,706,147
|
14,613,691
|
10,614,499
|
|||||||||
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
116,500
|
350,000
|
1,040,000
|
710,000
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income after
|
|||||||||||||
provision
for loan losses
|
4,918,754
|
3,356,147
|
13,573,691
|
9,904,499
|
|||||||||
Noninterest
Income
|
|||||||||||||
Mortgage
brokerage referral fees
|
373,299
|
673,029
|
1,052,937
|
1,648,487
|
|||||||||
Loan
processing fees
|
64,862
|
125,635
|
218,712
|
308,978
|
|||||||||
Fees
and service charges
|
166,749
|
143,793
|
455,159
|
428,195
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
27,653
|
43,125
|
117,349
|
131,818
|
|||||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
632,563
|
985,582
|
1,844,157
|
2,517,478
|
|||||||||
Noninterest
Expenses
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries
and benefits
|
2,795,341
|
2,393,739
|
7,709,120
|
6,652,635
|
|||||||||
Occupancy
and equipment expense, net
|
694,925
|
538,645
|
2,030,499
|
1,523,961
|
|||||||||
Data
processing and other outside services
|
293,358
|
333,024
|
1,100,622
|
817,291
|
|||||||||
Professional
services
|
125,269
|
120,170
|
373,227
|
383,461
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotional expenses
|
152,906
|
112,459
|
448,772
|
336,206
|
|||||||||
Loan
administration and processing expenses
|
46,286
|
47,839
|
126,759
|
153,511
|
|||||||||
Other
noninterest expenses
|
382,594
|
324,142
|
1,135,477
|
1,010,924
|
|||||||||
Total
noninterest expenses
|
4,490,679
|
3,870,018
|
12,924,476
|
10,877,989
|
|||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
1,060,638
|
471,711
|
2,493,372
|
1,543,988
|
|||||||||
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
390,000
|
191,000
|
916,000
|
625,000
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
670,638
|
$
|
280,711
|
$
|
1,577,372
|
$
|
918,988
|
|||||
Basic
income Per Share
|
$
|
0.20
|
$
|
0.11
|
$
|
0.49
|
$
|
0.37
|
|||||
Diluted
income Per Share
|
$
|
0.20
|
$
|
0.11
|
$
|
0.48
|
$
|
0.36
|
|||||
Dividends
per share
|
$
|
0.045
|
$
|
0.040
|
$
|
0.130
|
$
|
0.115
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
PATRIOT
NATIONAL BANCORP, INC
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net income | $ | 670,638 | $ | 280,711 | $ | 1,577,372 | $ | 918,988 | |||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities: | |||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) arising
|
|||||||||||||
during
the period, net of taxes
|
520,829 | (284,657 | ) | 249,294 | (461,446 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 1,191,467 | $ | (3,946 | ) | $ | 1,826,666 | $ | 457,542 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
PATRIOT
NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||
Number
of
|
Common
|
Paid-In
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Loss
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2004
|
2,486,391
|
$
|
4,972,782
|
$
|
11,830,173
|
$
|
3,346,718
|
$
|
(393,239
|
)
|
$
|
19,756,434
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
918,988
|
918,988
|
|||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding loss on available
|
|||||||||||||||||||
for
sale securities, net of taxes
|
(461,446
|
)
|
(461,446
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
457,542
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
|
(315,876
|
)
|
(315,876
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of capital stock
|
742,883
|
1,485,766
|
9,859,905
|
11,345,671
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2005
|
3,229,274
|
$
|
6,458,548
|
$
|
21,690,078
|
$
|
3,949,830
|
$
|
(854,685
|
)
|
$
|
31,243,771
|
|||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
3,230,649
|
$
|
6,461,298
|
$
|
21,709,224
|
$
|
4,308,242
|
$
|
(1,104,149
|
)
|
$
|
31,374,615
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
1,577,372
|
1,577,372
|
|||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gain on available
|
|||||||||||||||||||
for
sale securities, net of taxes
|
249,294
|
249,294
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
1,826,666
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
|
(488,107
|
)
|
(488,107
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of capital stock
|
1,508,845
|
3,017,690
|
27,598,725
|
30,616,415
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2006
|
4,739,494
|
$
|
9,478,988
|
$
|
49,307,949
|
$
|
5,397,507
|
$
|
(854,855
|
)
|
$
|
63,329,589
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1,577,372
|
$
|
918,988
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
|||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Amortization
and accretion of investment premiums and discounts, net
|
181,110
|
298,196
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,040,000
|
710,000
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
461,119
|
441,315
|
|||||
Directors
fees paid by issuance of common stock
|
24,928
|
-
|
|||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Increase
(decrease) in deferred loan fees
|
348,296
|
(86,946
|
)
|
||||
Increase
in accrued interest receivable
|
(756,829
|
)
|
(483,283
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in other assets
|
(16,015
|
)
|
(51,068
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
716,689
|
257,407
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
3,576,670
|
2,004,609
|
|||||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
|||||||
Purchases
of available for sale securities
|
-
|
(28,208,360
|
)
|
||||
Principal
repayments on available for sale securities
|
10,152,884
|
16,282,227
|
|||||
Proceeds
from maturities of available for sale securities
|
-
|
2,000,000
|
|||||
Purchase
of Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
(650
|
)
|
(600
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
(1,430,500
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
increase in loans
|
(92,980,090
|
)
|
(77,737,980
|
)
|
|||
Purchases
of bank premises and equipment
|
(657,844
|
)
|
(748,767
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(84,916,200
|
)
|
(88,413,480
|
)
|
|||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
|
|||||||
Net
decrease in demand, savings and money market deposits
|
(5,181,818
|
)
|
(5,742,167
|
)
|
|||
Net
increase in time certificates of deposits
|
90,610,348
|
48,505,111
|
|||||
Proceeds
from FHLB borrowings
|
93,718,000
|
36,001,000
|
|||||
Principal
repayments of FHLB borrowings
|
(68,718,000
|
)
|
(40,001,000
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
30,591,487
|
11,345,671
|
|||||
Dividends
paid on common stock
|
(404,057
|
)
|
(273,729
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
140,615,960
|
49,834,886
|
|||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
59,276,430
|
(36,573,985
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|||||||
Beginning
|
15,967,605
|
55,630,466
|
|||||
Ending
|
$
|
75,244,035
|
$
|
19,056,481
|
7
PATRIOT
NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, Continued
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|||||||
Cash
paid for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
12,355,752
|
$
|
7,241,149
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
1,319,020
|
$
|
780,921
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosures of noncash investing and financing activites:
|
|||||||
Transfer
of held to maturity securities to
|
|||||||
available
for sale securities
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Transfer
of loans to other real estate owned
|
$
|
834,341
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Unrealized
holding gain (loss) on available for sale
|
|||||||
securities
arising during the period
|
$
|
402,088
|
$
|
(744,270
|
)
|
||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
$
|
213,277
|
$
|
129,171
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
PATRIOT
NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note
1. Basis
of Financial Statement Presentation
The
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived from
the audited financial statements of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”)
at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required
by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
for
complete financial statements.
The
accompanying unaudited financial statements and related notes have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America have been omitted. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements of Bancorp and notes thereto
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The
information furnished reflects, in the opinion of management, all normal
recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for
the
interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations that may be expected for the remainder of
2006.
Certain
2005 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation. Such
reclassifications had no effect on net income.
Note
2. Investments
The
following table is a summary of Bancorp’s available for sale securities
portfolio, at fair value, at the dates shown:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
U.S. Government Agency and | |||||||
sponsored
agency obligations
|
$ | 16,539,324 | $ | 16,476,684 | |||
Mortgage-backed securities | 46,200,838 | 56,195,384 | |||||
Money market preferred | |||||||
equity
securities
|
6,000,000 | 6,000,000 | |||||
Total Available For Sale Securities | $ | 68,740,162 | $ | 78,672,068 |
9
The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair values
of available for sale securities at September 30, 2006 are as
follows:
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
||||||||||
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
||||||||||
U.
S. Government Agency and
|
|||||||||||||
sponsored
agency obligations
|
$
|
16,999,725
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(460,401
|
)
|
$
|
16,539,324
|
||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
47,119,234
|
7,435
|
(925,831
|
)
|
46,200,838
|
||||||||
Money
market preferred
|
|||||||||||||
equity
securities
|
6,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
6,000,000
|
|||||||||
Total
Available For Sale Securities
|
$
|
70,118,959
|
$
|
7,435
|
$
|
(1,386,232
|
)
|
$
|
68,740,162
|
At
September 30, 2006, gross unrealized holding gains and gross unrealized
holding losses on available for sale securities totaled $7,435 and
$1.4 million respectively. Of the securities with unrealized losses, there
are nine U. S. Government agency or sponsored agency obligations and 29
mortgage-backed securities that have unrealized losses for a period in excess
of
twelve months with a combined current unrealized loss of $1.4 million.
Management does not believe that any of the unrealized losses are other than
temporary since they are the result of changes in the interest rate environment
and they relate to debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by U. S.
Government and U.S. Government sponsored agencies. Bancorp has the ability
to
hold these securities to maturity if necessary and expects to receive all
contractual principal and interest related to these investments.
10
Note
3. Loans
The
following table is a summary of Bancorp’s loan portfolio at the dates
shown:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Real
Estate
|
|||||||
Commercial
|
$
|
153,846,478
|
$
|
129,178,889
|
|||
Residential
|
91,985,593
|
77,391,833
|
|||||
Construction
|
171,200,552
|
107,232,587
|
|||||
Commercial
|
16,597,015
|
15,591,818
|
|||||
Consumer
installment
|
1,237,842
|
1,106,648
|
|||||
Consumer
home equity
|
26,936,900
|
39,097,450
|
|||||
Total
Loans
|
461,804,380
|
369,599,225
|
|||||
Premiums
on purchased loans
|
310,183
|
367,491
|
|||||
Net
deferred fees
|
(1,482,900
|
)
|
(1,134,604
|
)
|
|||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(5,630,432
|
)
|
(4,588,335
|
)
|
|||
Loans
receivable, net
|
$
|
455,001,231
|
$
|
364,243,777
|
Analysis
of Allowance for Loan Losses
The
changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods shown are as
follows:
Three
months ending
|
Nine
months ending
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
(Thousands
of dollars)
|
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
|
5,510
|
$
|
3,842
|
$
|
4,588
|
$
|
3,482
|
|||||
Charge-offs
|
-
|
-
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
Recoveries
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
recoveries
|
3
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
|||||||||
Provision
charged to operations
|
117
|
350
|
1,040
|
710
|
|||||||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$
|
5,630
|
$
|
4,192
|
$
|
5,630
|
$
|
4,192
|
|||||
Ratio
of net recoveries during
|
|||||||||||||
the
period to average loans
|
|||||||||||||
outstanding
during the period.
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
11
Note
4. Deposits
The
following table is a summary of Bancorp’s deposits at the dates
shown:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Noninterest
bearing
|
$
|
50,928,672
|
$
|
48,797,389
|
|||
Interest
bearing
|
|||||||
NOW
|
33,370,486
|
25,383,234
|
|||||
Savings
|
23,804,913
|
20,089,889
|
|||||
Money
market
|
38,783,395
|
57,798,772
|
|||||
Time
certificates, less than $100,000
|
223,831,363
|
168,565,756
|
|||||
Time
certificates, $100,000 or more
|
133,784,989
|
98,440,248
|
|||||
Total
interest bearing
|
453,575,146
|
370,277,899
|
|||||
Total
Deposits
|
$
|
504,503,818
|
$
|
419,075,288
|
Note
5. Borrowings
In
addition to the outstanding borrowings disclosed in the consolidated balance
sheet, the Bank has the ability to borrow approximately $78.6 million in
additional advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston which includes
a
$2.0 million overnight line of credit. The Bank also has arranged a $3.0 million
overnight line of credit from a correspondent bank and $10.0 million under
a repurchase agreement; no amounts were outstanding under these two arrangements
at September 30, 2006.
Note
6. Income
per share
Bancorp
is required to present basic income per share and diluted income per share
in
its income statements. Basic income per share amounts are computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted
income per share reflects additional common shares that would have been
outstanding if potential dilutive common shares had been issued, as well as
any
adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential
common shares that may be issued by Bancorp relate to outstanding stock options
and are determined using the treasury stock method. Bancorp is also required
to
provide a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the
computation of both basic and diluted income per share. The following is
information about the computation of income per share for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.
12
Quarter
ended September 30, 2006
|
||||||||||
Net
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
||||||||
Basic
Income Per Share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
$
|
670,638
|
3,271,472
|
$
|
0.20
|
|||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||
Warrants/Stock
Options outstanding
|
-
|
25,188
|
-
|
|||||||
Diluted
Income Per Share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
||||||||||
plus
assumed conversions
|
$
|
670,638
|
3,296,660
|
$
|
0.20
|
|||||
Quarter
ended September 30, 2005
|
||||||||||
|
Net
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||
Basic
Income Per Share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
$
|
280,711
|
2,573,139
|
$
|
0.11
|
|||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||
Warrants/Stock
Options outstanding
|
-
|
34,033
|
-
|
|||||||
Diluted
Income Per Share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
||||||||||
plus
assumed conversions
|
$
|
280,711
|
2,607,172
|
$
|
0.11
|
|||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2006
|
||||||||||
|
Net
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||
Basic
Income Per Share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
$
|
1,577,372
|
3,244,162
|
$
|
0.49
|
|||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||
Warrants/Stock
Options outstanding
|
-
|
39,294
|
(0.01
|
)
|
||||||
Diluted
Income Per Share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
||||||||||
plus
assumed conversions
|
$
|
1,577,372
|
3,283,456
|
$
|
0.48
|
|||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2005
|
||||||||||
|
Net
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||
Basic
Income Per Share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
$
|
918,988
|
2,516,856
|
$
|
0.37
|
|||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||
Warrants/Stock
Options outstanding
|
-
|
43,935
|
(0.01
|
)
|
||||||
Diluted
Income Per Share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
||||||||||
plus
assumed conversions
|
$
|
918,988
|
2,560,791
|
$
|
0.36
|
13
Note
7. Other
Comprehensive Income
Other
comprehensive income, which is comprised solely of the change in unrealized
gains and losses on available for sale securities, is as follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
September
30, 2006
|
September
30, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||
Before
Tax
|
Net
of Tax
|
Before
Tax
|
Net
of Tax
|
||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Tax
Effect
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
Tax
Effect
|
Amount
|
||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gain
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arising
during the period
|
$
|
840,046
|
$
|
(319,217
|
)
|
$
|
520,829
|
$
|
402,088
|
$
|
(152,794
|
)
|
$
|
249,294
|
|||||
Reclassification
adjustment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
for
gains recognized in income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gain on
|
|||||||||||||||||||
available
for sale securities,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
net
of taxes
|
$
|
840,046
|
$
|
(319,217
|
)
|
$
|
520,829
|
$
|
402,088
|
$
|
(152,794
|
)
|
$
|
249,294
|
|||||
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
September
30, 2005
|
September
30, 2005
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Before
Tax
|
Net
of Tax
|
Before
Tax
|
Net
of Tax
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Tax
Effect
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
Tax
Effect
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding loss
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arising
during the period
|
$
|
(459,125
|
)
|
$
|
174,468
|
$
|
(284,657
|
)
|
$
|
(744,270
|
)
|
$
|
282,824
|
$
|
(461,446
|
)
|
|||
Reclassification
adjustment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
for
gains recognized in income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding loss on
|
|||||||||||||||||||
available
for sale securities,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
net
of taxes
|
$
|
(459,125
|
)
|
$
|
174,468
|
$
|
(284,657
|
)
|
$
|
(744,270
|
)
|
$
|
282,824
|
$
|
(461,446
|
)
|
Note
8. Financial
Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
In
the
normal course of business, Bancorp is a party to financial instruments with
off-balance-sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These
financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest
rate
risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheets. The contractual
amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement Bancorp has
in
particular classes of financial instruments. The contractual amounts of
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit represent the amounts
of potential accounting loss should: the contract be fully drawn
14
upon,
the
customer defaults and the value of any existing collateral becomes worthless.
Bancorp uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments and evaluates each
customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Management believes that
Bancorp controls the credit risk of these financial instruments through credit
approvals, credit limits, monitoring procedures and the receipt of collateral
as
deemed necessary.
Financial
instruments whose contractual amounts represent credit risk are as follows
at
September 30, 2006:
Commitments
to extend credit:
|
||||
Future
loan commitments
|
$
|
55,104,198
|
||
Unused
lines of credit
|
43,197,027
|
|||
Undisbursed
construction loans
|
79,926,186
|
|||
Financial
standby letters of credit
|
264,483
|
|||
$
|
178,491,894
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee by the borrower. Since these commitments could expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by Bancorp upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include residential and commercial property, deposits and securities.
Standby
letters of credit are written commitments issued by Bancorp to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing
letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan
facilities to customers. Newly issued or modified guarantees that are not
derivative contracts are recorded on Bancorp’s consolidated balance sheet at the
fair value at inception. No liability related to guarantees was required to
be
recorded at September 30, 2006.
Note
9. Stock
Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS
123R). Under SFAS 123R, companies are no longer permitted to account for
share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method in
accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 whereby compensation cost charged to expense,
if any, was the excess of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant
date
(or other measurement date) over the amount an employee would pay to acquire
the
stock. Instead, under SFAS 123R
15
companies
are required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and
recognize the expense in the consolidated
statements of income. This statement applies to all awards granted, modified,
repurchased or cancelled after the required effective date.
The
Company adopted SFAS 123R, effective January 1, 2006, using the modified
prospective transition method; this may impact the amount of compensation
expense recorded in future financial statements if the Company grants
share-based compensation to employees or directors in the future.
Stock
Options
On
August 17, 1999, the Bank adopted a stock option plan (the “Plan”) for
employees and directors, under which both incentive and non-qualified stock
options were granted, and subsequently the Company assumed all obligations
related to such options. The Plan provided for the grant of 110,000
non-qualified and incentive stock options in 1999 to certain directors of the
Company, with an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s stock
on the date of the grant. Such options were immediately exercisable and expire,
if unexercised, ten years after the date of the grant. The Company has reserved
65,000 shares of common stock remaining for issuance under the Plan. No
additional options may be granted under the Plan.
A
summary
of the status of the stock options at September 30, 2006 and 2005 is as
follows:
Weighted
|
||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||
Number
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
||||||||
of
Shares
|
Price
|
Life
(in years)
|
||||||||
September
30, 2006
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
January 1, 2006
|
73,000
|
$
|
10.13
|
3.7
|
||||||
Exercised
|
8,000
|
10.11
|
||||||||
Outstanding,
September 30, 2006
|
65,000
|
10.13
|
2.9
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2006
|
65,000
|
10.13
|
2.9
|
|||||||
September
30, 2005
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
January 1, 2005
|
110,000
|
$
|
10.13
|
4.7
|
||||||
Exercised
|
37,000
|
10.15
|
||||||||
Outstanding,
September 30, 2005
|
73,000
|
10.13
|
3.9
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2005
|
73,000
|
10.13
|
3.9
|
16
The
intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2006
and
2005 was $1,144,260 and $645,466, respectively. The intrinsic value of options
exercised during the
nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $149,275 and $316,037,
respectively. There are no pro forma disclosures required for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, because there was no compensation expense
attributed to these periods as no awards were granted or vested under this
Plan
during these periods.
The
provisions of SFAS 123R have had no impact on existing plans under the
employment agreements discussed below:
President’s
Agreement
Under
the
terms of a previous employment agreement, which expired on October 23, 2003
(the
“Agreement”) between the Company and the President, was a provision that the
Company grants shares of the Company’s common stock to the President on
December 31, 2000, and annually thereafter through December 31,
2003. The number of shares was based on 30% of the President’s base salary
for the preceding annual employment period. Compensation costs for grants
through 2002 were recognized over the period ending with the expiration date
of
the Agreement and compensation cost for the 2003 grant is being recognized
over
the term of the current employment agreement. This stock grant has been settled
in cash in each year from 2001 through 2005 and is anticipated to settle in
cash
until fully settled. The expense charged to operations related to this component
of the Agreement was $11,798 and $6,813, respectively, for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $41,174 and $20,439, respectively,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.
The
Agreement also provided for the grant of options to purchase a minimum of 10,000
shares of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2000, and
annually thereafter through December 31, 2003. In the event that the
Company did not have stock options available to grant at any of these dates,
which was the case at December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003, the
President was able to elect, on a future determination date, to be chosen by
the
President, to receive cash compensation in the future equal to the difference
between the value of the Company’s stock at the time the options would have been
granted, and the value of the Company’s stock on the determination date. The
expense charged to operations for the option component of the Agreement was
$32,208 and $18,885, respectively, for the three months ended September 30,
2006
and 2005, and $103,833 and $56,655, respectively, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005.
Stock
Appreciation Rights Plan
During
2001, the Company adopted the Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 2001 Stock
Appreciation Rights Plan (the “SAR Plan”), providing for the grant by the
Company of stock appreciation rights to officers of the Company. Stock
appreciation rights entitle the
17
officers
to receive, in cash or Company common stock, the appreciation in value of the
Company’s common stock from the date of the grant. Each award vests at the rate
of 20% per year from the date of the grant. Any unexercised rights will expire
ten years from the date of grant. During
2001, the Company granted 18,000 stock appreciation rights to three officers.
The expense charged to operations under the SAR Plan was $21,832 and $14,535,
respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and
$88,816 and $43,605, respectively, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005.
Note
10. Segment
Reporting
Bancorp
provides its commercial customers with products such as commercial mortgage
and
construction loans, working capital loans, equipment loans and other business
financing arrangements, and provides its consumer customers with residential
mortgage loans, home equity loans and other consumer installment loans. Bancorp
also attracts deposits from both consumer and commercial customers, and invests
such deposits in loans, investments and working capital. Revenues are generated
primarily from net interest income from lending, investment and deposit
activities. Additional revenues are derived from loan brokerage and application
processing fees through the solicitation and processing of conventional mortgage
loans, deposit account transaction based fees and service charges and other
loan
origination and processing fees.
Bancorp’s
loan and deposit customers are primarily residents and businesses located in
the
Connecticut communities in which Bancorp has branches, as well as in bordering
communities. Its lending customers extend beyond these areas and also include
other nonadjacent towns in Fairfield County, Connecticut and towns in
Westchester County, New York. Bancorp also makes loans from its Melville (Long
Island) and New York City, New York loan production offices.
Bancorp’s
customer base is diversified. There is not a concentration of either loans
or
deposits from a single person or groups of individuals or within a single
industry or groups of industries. Bancorp is not dependent on one or a few
significant customers for either its loan or deposit activities, the loss of
any
one of which would have a material adverse impact on its business.
Prior
to
April 1, 2006, Bancorp had two reportable segments: commercial banking
and mortgage brokerage activities. The operations of the mortgage broker have
been fully integrated into the operations of the commercial bank. The activities
of the former mortgage broker segment have expanded to include the products
and
services of the former commercial banking segment and developed such that they
are indistinguishable from the lending activities of the commercial bank. Any
such separate financial disclosures would be consistent with those presented
in
the financial statements.
18
Note
11. Other
real estate owned
Other
real estate owned of $834,000 is included in other assets and is comprised
of
one property obtained through loan foreclosure proceedings completed at the
end
of the third quarter of 2006.
Note
12. Commitments
Bancorp
has received regulatory approval to purchase a New York City branch office
and
the related deposits from another financial institution. The transaction is
expected to close during the fourth quarter; after which, it is anticipated
that
Bancorp will record intangible assets of approximately $560,000 related to
this
acquisition.
Note
13. Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July
2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
FIN 48
applies to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS
No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes.
This
includes tax positions considered to be “routine” as well as those with a high
degree of uncertainty. FIN 48 utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating tax
positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that
a tax
position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to
be
sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) is only addressed if step
one
has been satisfied (i.e., the position is more-likely-than-not to be sustained).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum
recognition threshold a tax position must meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition.
FIN
48 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Earlier
adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an enterprise’s fiscal year,
provided the enterprise has not yet issued financial statements, including
financial statements for any interim period, for that fiscal year. Management
elected not to early adopt FIN 48 and does not believe that the adoption of
FIN
48 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
19
"SAFE
HARBOR" STATEMENT UNDER PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF
1995
Certain
statements contained in Bancorp’s public reports, including this report, and in
particular in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and
Results of Operation," may be forward looking and subject to a variety of risks
and uncertainties. These factors include, but are not limited to,
(1) changes in prevailing interest rates which would affect the interest
earned on Bancorp's interest earning assets and the interest paid on its
interest bearing liabilities, (2) the timing of repricing of Bancorp's
interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, (3) the effect of
changes in governmental monetary policy, (4) the effect of changes in
regulations applicable to Bancorp and the conduct of its business,
(5) changes in competition among financial services companies, including
possible further encroachment of non-banks on services traditionally provided
by
banks, (6) the ability of competitors that are larger than Bancorp to
provide products and services that are impracticable for Bancorp to provide,
(7) the effects of Bancorp's opening of branches, including a new branch in
New York State, (8) the effect of any decision by Bancorp to engage in any
new business activities and (9) the ability of Bancorp to timely and
successfully deploy the capital raised in the 2006 offering and any future
offerings. Other such factors may be described in Bancorp's future filings
with
the SEC.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. A material estimate that is particularly
susceptible to significant near-term change relates to the determination of
the
allowance for loan losses. Actual results could differ significantly from those
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The Company believes
the
following discussion addresses Bancorp’s only critical accounting policy, which
is the policy that is most important to the presentation of Bancorp’s financial
results. This policy requires management’s most difficult, subjective and
complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the
effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
The
allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have
occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses
are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility
of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited
to
the allowance.
The
allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and
is
based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in
light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio,
adverse situations that may
20
affect the
borrower’s
ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing
economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires
estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information
becomes available.
The
allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific
component relates to loans that are considered impaired. A risk rating system
is
utilized to measure the adequacy of the general component of the allowance
for
loan losses. Under this system, each loan is assigned a risk rating between
one
and nine, which has a corresponding loan loss factor assigned, with a rating
of
“one” being the least risk and a rating of “nine” reflecting the most risk or a
complete loss. Risk ratings are assigned based upon the recommendations of
the
credit analyst and originating loan officer and confirmed by the loan committee
at the initiation of the transactions and are reviewed and changed, when
necessary, during the life of the loan. Loan loss reserve factors are applied
to
the balances in each risk rating category to arrive at the appropriate level
of
the allowance for loan losses. Loans assigned a risk rating of “six” or above
are monitored more closely by the credit administration officers. The
unallocated portion of the allowance reflects management’s estimate of probable
but undetected losses inherent in the portfolio; such estimates are influenced
by uncertainties in economic conditions, delays in obtaining information,
including unfavorable information about a borrower’s financial condition,
difficulty in identifying triggering events that correlate perfectly to
subsequent loss rates, and risk factors that have not yet manifested themselves
in loss allocation factors. Loan quality control is continually monitored by
management subject to oversight by the board of directors through its members
who serve on the loan committee. It is also reviewed by the full board of
directors on a monthly basis. The methodology for determining the adequacy
of
the allowance for loan losses is consistently applied; however, revisions may
be
made to the methodology and assumptions based on historical information related
to charge-off and recovery experience and management’s evaluation of the current
loan portfolio.
21
Item
2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
SUMMARY
Bancorp
completed a stock offering of 1.5 million shares during September 2006 resulting
in an increase in common stock and additional paid in capital of
$30.5 million, net of offering fees and expenses.
Bancorp’s
net income of $671,000 ($0.20 basic and diluted income per share) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 represents an increase of $390,000,
or 139%, as compared to net income of $281,000 ($0.11 basic and diluted income
per share) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. For the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, net income of $1,577,000
($0.49 basic income per share and $0.48 diluted income per share) represents
an
increase of $658,000, or 72%, as compared to net income of $919,000 ($0.37
basic
income per share and $0.36 diluted income per share) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005.
Total
assets increased $143.2 million from $470.6 million at December 31, 2005 to
$613.8 million at September 30, 2006. Cash and cash equivalents
increased $59.2 million to $75.2 million at
September 30, 2006 as compared to $16.0 million at
December 31, 2005. The available for sale securities portfolio
decreased $9.9 million to $68.7 million at September 30, 2006
from $78.7 million at December 31, 2005. The net loan portfolio increased
$90.8 million from $364.2 million at December 31, 2005 to $455.0 million at
September 30, 2006. Deposits increased $85.4 million to
$504.5 million
at September 30, 2006 from $419.1 million at
December 31, 2005. Borrowings increased $25.0 million from
$17.2 million at December 31, 2005 to $42.2 million at
September 30, 2006. Total shareholders’ equity increased
$31.9 million from $31.4 million at December 31, 2005 to
$63.3 million at September 30, 2006.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Assets
Bancorp’s
total assets increased $143.2 million, or 30%, from $470.6 million at
December 31, 2005 to $613.8 million at September 30, 2006.
The growth in the balance sheet was funded by an increase in deposits and
borrowings and through a stock offering as discussed below. Cash and cash
equivalents increased $59.2 million to $75.2 million at
September 30, 2006 as compared to $16.0 million at
December 31, 2005. Cash and due from banks decreased
$0.7 million. Federal funds sold and short term investments increased
$32.0 million and $28.0 million, respectively; these increases are the
result of investing funds from the receipt of the stock offering proceeds which
closed on the last business day of the quarter as well as to a large inflow
of
certificates of deposit and attorney escrow account deposits late in the
month.
22
Investments
Available
for sale securities decreased $9.9 million, or 13%, from $78.7 million
at December 31, 2005 to $68.7 million at
September 30, 2006. The decrease in the portfolio is due to principal
payments on mortgage-backed securities.
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
Bancorp’s
investment in the capital stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank increased
$1.4 million to $2.7 million at September 30, 2006 from
$1.3 million at December 31, 2005. As a member of the Federal
Home Loan Bank, the Bank’s required investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
takes into consideration the level of outstanding Federal Home Loan Bank
advances, among other factors. This increase is a direct result of an increase
in Federal Home Loan Bank advances discussed later.
Loans
Bancorp’s
net loan portfolio increased $90.8 million, or 25%, from
$364.2 million at December 31, 2005 to $455.0 million at
September 30, 2006. Significant increases in the portfolio included a
$64.0 million increase in construction loans, a $24.7 million increase
in commercial real estate loans and a $14.6 million increase in residential
real estate loans. The growth in these segments of the loan portfolio were
partially offset by a decrease in home equity loans of $12.2 million due in
part to an increase in the prime rate, to which these loans are tied, prompting
a number of borrowers to refinance and roll home equity debt into first
mortgages. Although short term interest rates have increased, the growth in
loans reflects the continued strong demand for real estate based financing
in
the Fairfield County, Connecticut and Westchester County, New York market areas
where the Bank primarily conducts its lending business.
At
September 30, 2006, the net loan to deposit ratio was 90% and the net
loan to total assets ratio was 74%. At December 31, 2005, the net loan to
deposit ratio was 87% and the net loan to total assets ratio was 77%. Based
on
loan applications in process and the recent and planned hiring of additional
loan officers, management anticipates continued loan growth during the remainder
of 2006.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
Management
believes the allowance for loan losses of $5.6 million at
September 30, 2006, which represents 1.22% of gross loans outstanding,
is adequate, under prevailing economic conditions, to absorb losses on existing
loans. At December 31, 2005, the allowance for loan losses was
$4.6 million or 1.25% of gross loans outstanding.
23
Non-Accrual,
Past Due and Restructured Loans
The
following table presents non-accruing loans and loans past due 90 days or more
and still accruing:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
(Thousands of dollars ) |
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
Loans delinquent over 90 days | $ | 50 | $ | 275 | |||
still
accruing
|
|||||||
Non accruing loans | 3,612 | 1,935 | |||||
Total
|
$ | 3,662 | $ | 2,210 | |||
% of Total Loans | 0.79 | % | 0.60 | % | |||
% of Total Assets | 0.60 | % | 0.47 | % |
Potential
Problem Loans
The
$3.6
million of non-accrual loans at September 30, 2006 was comprised of
two loans. One loan in the amount of $1.1 million matured in
June 2005. The borrower has continued to make principal, interest and
property tax escrow payments on this loan. However, the borrower is currently
in
bankruptcy proceedings. The Bank expects that the borrower will refinance the
two properties held as collateral upon emerging from bankruptcy, and the
proceeds of the refinancing will be used to repay the outstanding indebtedness
due to the Bank. While no assurances can be given, the Bank expects this will
occur during the fourth quarter of 2006. The remaining loan in the amount of
$2.5 million is in the process of collection and is adequately
collateralized. In July 2006, the Bank obtained a judgment for foreclosure
on this loan, with a sale date scheduled for December 2, 2006.
Included in non-accrual loans at December 31, 2005, was a loan in the
amount of $840,000 for which the Bank obtained a judgment for strict foreclosure
at the end of the third quarter of 2006; the property was transferred to other
real estate owned and is reflected in other assets.
At
September 30, 2006, Bancorp had no loans, other than those disclosed
in the table above, for which management has significant doubts as to the
ability of the borrower to comply with the present repayment terms.
Deposits
Total
deposits increased $85.4 million or 20% from $419.1 million at December 31,
2005 to $504.5 million at September 30, 2006. Noninterest bearing
deposits increased $2.1 million, or 4%; increases in commercial demand and
internal accounts of $3.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, were
partially offset by a decrease in personal checking accounts of
$1.5 million. Interest bearing deposits increased $83.3 million
or
24
23%
from
$370.3 million at December 31, 2005 to $453.6 million at
September 30, 2006. NOW accounts increased $8.0 million or
31% as compared to December 31, 2005; increased volume in attorney escrow
accounts of $9.0 million and municipal accounts transferred from money
market accounts of $1.3 million were partially offset by decreases in other
NOW account products of $2.3 million. Money market fund accounts decreased
$19.0, million or 33%, from $57.8 million at December 31, 2005 to
$38.8 million at September 30, 2006 primarily due to increases in
certificate of deposit rates offered by both the Bank and its competitors which
prompted money market fund account holders to transfer funds to higher rate
certificates of deposit. Additionally, as indicated above, municipal money
market accounts decreased $1.3 million as a result of a transfer to a NOW
account. Certificates of deposit increased $90.6 million, or 34%, from
$267.0 million at December 31, 2005 to $357.6 million at
September 30, 2006. Included in the growth of certificates of deposits
is $14.5 million of brokered deposits which mature in October 2006. The
remaining growth in certificates of deposit is the result of the competitive
rates the Bank continues to offer in order to remain a viable source of deposit
products in an increasingly competitive market.
Borrowings
At
September 30, 2006, total borrowings were $42.2 million. This
represents an increase of $25.0 million compared to total borrowings of
$17.2 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in borrowings
supplemented deposit inflow in order to fund loan demand.
Capital
Capital
increased $31.9 million or 102% from $31.4 million at
December 31, 2005 to $63.3 million at
September 30, 2006. A stock offering, completed at the end of the
third quarter, combined with the exercise of certain stock options and shares
issued to outside directors (disclosed in Item 2 of Part II), resulted in an
increase in common stock of 1,508,845 shares representing net proceeds of
$30.6 million. Year to date income of $1.6 million and an increase in
the market value of the available for sale securities portfolio of $249,000,
net
of deferred taxes, was partially offset by the declaration of dividends of
$488,000 and resulted in a net increase in retained earnings and accumulated
other comprehensive income of $1.3 million.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
There
were no significant changes in Bancorp’s off-balance sheet arrangements which
primarily consist of commitments to lend, during the quarter and nine months
ended September 30, 2006.
25
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Interest
and dividend income and expense
The
following tables present average balance sheets (daily averages), interest
income, interest expense and the corresponding yields earned and rates paid
for
major balance sheet components:
Three
months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
|
Interest
|
||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Income/
|
Average
|
Average
|
Income/
|
Average
|
||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Expense
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
earning assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$
|
454,672
|
$
|
8,962
|
7.88
|
%
|
|
$
321,931
|
$
|
5,536
|
6.88
|
%
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
other
cash equivalents
|
12,516
|
166
|
5.31
|
%
|
17,199
|
142
|
3.30
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Investments
|
74,646
|
729
|
3.91
|
%
|
86,832
|
761
|
3.51
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
earning
assets
|
541,834
|
9,857
|
7.28
|
%
|
425,962
|
6,439
|
6.05
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
4,902
|
5,280
|
|||||||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
2,371
|
2,282
|
|||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(5,513
|
)
|
(3,954
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
7,020
|
5,783
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
550,614
|
$
|
435,353
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$
|
420,813
|
$
|
4,153
|
3.95
|
%
|
|
$
350,262
|
$
|
2,515
|
2.87
|
%
|
|||||||
FHLB
advances
|
36,837
|
491
|
5.33
|
%
|
8,783
|
80
|
3.64
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
8,248
|
177
|
8.58
|
%
|
8,248
|
137
|
6.64
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
46
|
1
|
8.70
|
%
|
134
|
1
|
2.99
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bearing
liabilities
|
465,944
|
4,822
|
4.14
|
%
|
367,427
|
2,733
|
2.98
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Demand
deposits
|
47,063
|
42,515
|
|||||||||||||||||
Accrued
expenses and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
other
liabilities
|
4,207
|
3,652
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
33,400
|
21,759
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
550,614
|
$
|
435,353
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ |
5,035
|
$ |
3,706
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
margin
|
3.72
|
%
|
3.48
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
spread
|
3.14
|
%
|
3.07
|
%
|
26
Nine
months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
|
Interest
|
||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Income/
|
Average
|
Average
|
Income/
|
Average
|
||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Expense
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
earning assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$
|
428,211
|
$
|
24,473
|
7.62
|
%
|
|
$
302,134
|
$
|
15,129
|
6.68
|
%
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
other
cash equivalents
|
8,348
|
309
|
4.94
|
%
|
18,717
|
383
|
2.73
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Investments
|
77,382
|
2,268
|
3.91
|
%
|
89,051
|
2,331
|
3.49
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
earning
assets
|
513,941
|
27,050
|
7.02
|
%
|
409,902
|
17,843
|
5.80
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
5,729
|
4,933
|
|||||||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
2,348
|
2,133
|
|||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(5,220
|
)
|
(3,767
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
6,695
|
5,594
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
523,493
|
$
|
418,795
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$
|
401,707
|
$
|
10,834
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
$
332,728
|
$
|
6,543
|
2.62
|
%
|
|||||||
FHLB
advances
|
29,045
|
1,100
|
5.05
|
%
|
11,634
|
304
|
3.48
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
8,248
|
497
|
8.03
|
%
|
8,248
|
380
|
6.14
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
129
|
5
|
5.17
|
%
|
45
|
1
|
2.96
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bearing
liabilities
|
439,129
|
12,436
|
3.78
|
%
|
352,655
|
7,228
|
2.73
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Demand
deposits
|
47,727
|
42,286
|
|||||||||||||||||
Accrued
expenses and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
other
liabilities
|
4,176
|
3,207
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
32,461
|
20,647
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
523,493
|
$
|
418,795
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ |
14,614
|
$ |
10,615
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
margin
|
3.79
|
%
|
3.45
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
spread
|
3.24
|
%
|
3.07
|
%
|
27
The
following rate volume analysis reflects the changes in net interest income
arising from changes in interest rates and from asset and liability volume,
including mix. The change in interest attributable to volume includes changes
in
interest attributable to mix.
Three
months ended September 30,
|
Nine
months ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2006
vs 2005
|
2006
vs 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Fluctuations
in Interest
|
Fluctuations
in Interest
|
||||||||||||||||||
Income/Expense
|
Income/Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Due
to change in:
|
Due
to change in:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
earning assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$
|
2,529
|
$
|
897
|
$
|
3,426
|
$
|
6,987
|
$
|
2,357
|
$
|
9,344
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
other
cash equivalents
|
(104
|
)
|
128
|
24
|
(200
|
)
|
126
|
(74
|
)
|
||||||||||
Investments
|
(401
|
)
|
369
|
(32
|
)
|
(392
|
)
|
329
|
(63
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
earning
assets
|
2,024
|
1,394
|
3,418
|
6,395
|
2,812
|
9,207
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
bearing liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$
|
573
|
$
|
1,065
|
$
|
1,638
|
$
|
1,537
|
$
|
2,754
|
$
|
4,291
|
|||||||
FHLB
advances
|
359
|
52
|
411
|
602
|
194
|
796
|
|||||||||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
-
|
40
|
40
|
-
|
117
|
117
|
|||||||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
(2
|
)
|
2
|
-
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
||||||||||||
Total
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bearing
liabilities
|
930
|
1,159
|
2,089
|
2,140
|
3,068
|
5,208
|
|||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
1,094
|
$
|
235
|
$
|
1,329
|
$
|
4,255
|
$
|
(256
|
)
|
$
|
3,999
|
An
increase in average interest earning assets of $116.6 million, or 27%,
combined with an increase in interest rates increased Bancorp’s interest income
$3.4 million or 53% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
compared to the same period in 2005. Interest and fees on loans increased
$3.4 million, or 62%, from $5.5 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 to $8.9 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006. This increase was primarily the result of the
increase in the average outstanding balances of the loan portfolio followed
by
the impact of a rising rate environment. Interest income on investments
decreased slightly; the decrease in interest income from the reduction in the
portfolio due to principal payments on mortgage backed securities was offset
by
an increase in the interest rates on the remaining portfolio. Interest income
on
federal funds and other cash equivalents increased as a result of an increase
in
short term interest rates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
interest and dividend income was $27.0 million which represents an increase
of $9.2 million, or 52%, as compared to
28
interest
and dividend income of $17.8 million for the same period last year. This
increase was due to the reasons cited earlier.
Total
interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of
$4.8 million represents an increase of $2.1 million or 76% as compared to
the same period last year. The increase in interest expense is primarily the
result of higher interest rates paid on deposit accounts and a higher volume
of
FHLB advances; an increase in total average interest bearing liabilities of
$98.5 million or 27% also contributed to the increase in interest expense.
The increase in interest rates combined with the increase in the average
balances of deposit accounts of $70.5 million, or 20%, resulted in an
increase in interest expense of $1.6 million, or 65%. Average FHLB advances
increased $28.1 million or 319%; this increase in average balances combined
with the increase in interest paid on FHLB advances resulted in an increase
in
interest expense of $411,000, or 514%. The increase in the index to which the
junior subordinated debt is tied resulted in an increase in interest expense
of
$40,000, or 29%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 total
interest expense increased $5.2 million, or 72%, to $12.4 million as
compared to $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This
increase in interest expense was due to the reasons cited earlier.
As
a
result of the above, Bancorp’s net interest income increased $1.3 million,
or 36%, to $5.0 million for the three months ended
September 30 2006 as compared to $3.7 million for the same period
last year. Net interest income increased $4.0 million, or 38%, to
$14.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared
to $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005.
Provision
for loan losses
The
provision for loan losses charged to operations for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 was $117,000 as compared to $350,000 for the same
period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
provision for loan losses was $1,040,000 as compared to $710,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005. These variances were due to the credit
risk factors assigned to the loan portfolio, as well as, to the growth in the
loan portfolio and not to any adverse or more favorable changes in the credit
quality of the loan portfolio or changes in non-performing loans.
An
analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses is presented under
“Allowance for Loan Losses.”
Noninterest
income
Noninterest
income decreased $353,000, or 36%, from $986,000 for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 to $633,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006. A decrease in the volume of loans placed with
outside investors resulted in a decrease in mortgage brokerage and referral
fee
income of $300,000 and a decrease in loan origination
29
and
processing fee income of $61,000. Fees and service charges for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 increased $23,000, or 16%, as compared to the
same period last year. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the
service charges on deposit accounts. Other income decreased $15,000 as compared
to the same period last year which reflected the settlement of an insurance
claim.
For
the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, noninterest income decreased
$673,000, or 27% to $1.8 million as compared to $2.5 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005. This decrease was due to a
decrease in mortgage brokerage and referral fee income and loan origination
and
processing fee income partially offset by an increase in service charges for
similar reasons cited above.
Noninterest
expenses
Noninterest
expenses increased $621,000, or 16%, to $4.5 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 from $3.9 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005. Salaries and benefits expense increased $402,000,
or 17%, to $2.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from
$2.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. This increase
was primarily due to staff additions, increases in bonuses and incentive
compensation and salary increases made during the last quarter of 2005.
Occupancy and equipment expense, net, increased $156,000, or 29% to $695,000
for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from $539,000 for the quarter
ended September 30, 2005 due to the leasing of additional space for
the Bank’s lending and credit administration functions during the last quarter
of 2005, lease expense during 2006 for branches under renovation and a new
metropolitan New York loan production office. Increased marketing campaigns
and
related activities resulted in an increase in advertising and promotional
expenses of $40,000, or 36%, to $153,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 from $112,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2005. Data processing and other outside services
decreased $40,000, or 12%, from $333,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 to $294,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 primarily due to decreases in personnel placement
fees, information technology consulting and temporary office staffing which
were
partially offset by increases in data processing and correspondent banking
expenses. The increases in data processing and correspondent banking expenses
were a result of the growth in the branch network as well as increased ongoing
maintenance charges for the implementation of new products and
services.
For
the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, noninterest expenses increased
$2.0 million, or 19%, to $12.9 million as compared to
$10.9 million for the nine months ended Septemeber 30, 2005. Salaries
and benefits expense increased $1.1 million, or 16% to $7.7 million;
occupancy and equipment expense, net increased $507,000 or 33%. These increases
are due to similar reasons cited above and to the full year impact in 2006
of
the staffing additions and occupancy and equipment expenses incurred with an
additional branch location established during the second quarter of 2005. Data
processing and other outside services and advertising and promotional expenses
increased $283,000
30
and
$113,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
as compared to the same period last year. These increases were due to similar
reasons cited earlier.
Income
Taxes
Bancorp
recorded income tax expense of $390,000 for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to $191,000 for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
income tax expense was $916,000 as compared to $625,000 for the same period
last
year. These changes were related primarily to the change in pre-tax income
and
the exclusion for state tax purposes of certain holding company expenses. The
effective tax rates for the quarters ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005 were 37% and 40%, respectively; the effective tax
rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30,
2005 were 37% and 40%, respectively.
LIQUIDITY
Bancorp's
liquidity ratio was 23% at both September 30, 2006 and 2005. The
liquidity ratio is defined as the percentage of liquid assets to total assets.
The following categories of assets as described in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets are considered liquid assets: cash and due from banks, federal
funds sold, short term investments and available for sale securities. Liquidity
is a measure of Bancorp’s ability to generate adequate cash to meet financial
obligations. The principal cash requirements of a financial institution are
to
cover downward fluctuations in deposit accounts and increases in its loan
portfolio. Management believes Bancorp’s short-term assets provide sufficient
liquidity to cover loan demand, potential fluctuations in deposit accounts
and
to meet other anticipated cash operating requirements.
CAPITAL
The
following table illustrates Bancorp’s regulatory capital ratios at September
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 respectively:
September
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||
Total
Risk-based Capital
|
16.70%
|
|
12.70%
|
|
Tier
1 Risk-based Capital
|
15.47%
|
11.45%
|
||
Leverage
Capital
|
12.94%
|
8.56%
|
31
The
following table illustrates the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios at September
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 respectively:
September
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||
Total
Risk-based Capital
|
16.35%
|
12.52%
|
||
Tier
1 Risk-based Capital
|
15.13%
|
11.27%
|
||
Leverage
Capital
|
12.65%
|
8.42%
|
Capital
adequacy is one of the most important factors used to determine the safety
and
soundness of individual banks and the banking system. Based on the above ratios,
the Bank is considered to be “well capitalized” at September 30, 2006 under
applicable regulations. To be considered “well-capitalized,” an institution must
generally have a leverage capital ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of at least 6% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least
10%.
The
increase in capital ratios is due to the stock offering and the increase in
retained earnings partially offset by the growth of the Bank. Management
continuously assesses the adequacy of the Bank’s capital to ensure that the Bank
remains a “well capitalized” institution. Management’s strategic and capital
plans contemplate various options to maintain the “well capitalized”
classification.
IMPACT
OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
Bancorp’s
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in terms of historical
dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money
over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all
of
the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature.
As
a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial
institution’s performance than the general levels of inflation. Interest rates
do not necessarily move in the same direction or with the same magnitude as
the
prices of goods and services. Notwithstanding this, inflation can directly
affect the value of loan collateral, in particular, real estate. Inflation,
or
disinflation, could significantly affect Bancorp’s earnings in future
periods.
32
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market
risk is defined as the sensitivity of income to fluctuations in interest rates,
foreign exchange rates, equity prices, commodity prices and other market-driven
rates or prices. Based upon the nature of Bancorp’s business, market risk is
primarily limited to interest rate risk, which is the impact, that changing
interest rates have on current and future earnings.
Qualitative
Aspects of Market Risk
Bancorp’s
goal is to maximize long term profitability while minimizing its exposure to
interest rate fluctuations. The first priority is to structure and price
Bancorp’s assets and liabilities to maintain an acceptable interest rate spread
while reducing the net effect of changes in interest rates. In order to
accomplish this, the focus is on maintaining a proper balance between the timing
and volume of assets and liabilities re-pricing within the balance sheet. One
method of achieving this balance is to originate variable rate loans for the
portfolio and purchase short term investments to offset the increasing short
term re-pricing of the liability side of the balance sheet. In fact, a number
of
the interest bearing deposit products have no contractual maturity. Therefore,
deposit balances may run off unexpectedly due to changing market conditions.
Additionally, loans and investments with longer term rate adjustment frequencies
are matched against longer term deposits and borrowings to lock in a desirable
spread.
The
exposure to interest rate risk is monitored by the Management Asset and
Liability Committee consisting of senior management personnel. The Committee
meets on a monthly basis, but may convene more frequently as conditions dictate.
The Committee reviews the interrelationships within the balance sheet to
maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of risk. This Committee
reports to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis regarding its activities.
In addition to the Management Asset and Liability Committee, there is a Board
Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) which meets quarterly. ALCO monitors the
interest rate risk analyses, reviews investment transaction during the period
and determines compliance with Bank policies.
Quantitative
Aspects of Market Risk
Management
analyzes Bancorp’s interest rate sensitivity position to manage the risk
associated with interest rate movements through the use of interest income
simulation and GAP analysis. The matching of assets and liabilities may be
analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are
“interest sensitive.” An asset or liability is said to be interest sensitive
within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time
period.
Management’s
goal is to manage asset and liability positions to moderate the effects of
interest rate fluctuations on net interest income. Interest income simulations
are completed
33
quarterly
and presented to ALCO. The simulations provide an estimate of the impact of
changes in interest rates on net interest income under a range of assumptions.
Changes to these assumptions can significantly affect the results of the
simulations. The simulation incorporates assumptions regarding the potential
timing in the repricing of certain assets and liabilities when market rates
change and the changes in spreads between different market rates.
Simulation
analysis is only an estimate of Bancorp’s interest rate risk exposure at a
particular point in time. Management regularly reviews the potential effect
changes in interest rates could have on the repayment of rate sensitive assets
and funding requirements of rate sensitive liabilities.
Management
has established interest rate risk guidelines measured by behavioral GAP
analysis calculated at the one year cumulative GAP level and a net interest
income and economic value of portfolio equity simulation model measured by
a 200
basis point interest rate shock.
The
table
below sets forth an approximation of Bancorp’s exposure to changing interest
rates using management’s behavioral GAP analysis and as a percentage of
estimated net interest income and estimated net portfolio value using interest
income simulation. The calculations use projected repricings of assets and
liabilities at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 on the basis
of contractual maturities, anticipated repayments and scheduled rate
adjustments.
Basis
|
Interest
Rate
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|
Points
|
Risk
Guidelines
|
2006
|
2005
|
|
|
||||
Gap
percentage total
|
+/-
15%
|
8.33%
|
4.98%
|
|
Net
interest income
|
200
|
+/-
15%
|
15.75%
|
14.49%
|
-200
|
+/-
15%
|
-17.87%
|
-14.24%
|
|
Net
portfolio value
|
200
|
+/-
25%
|
-1.90%
|
0.45%
|
-200
|
+/-
25%
|
-2.87%
|
-7.89%
|
Bancorp
benefited during 2006 from a rising interest rate environment as assets
re-priced faster than liabilities and, combined with a 25% increase in the
loan
portfolio, resulted in an expanding net interest margin. These factors
contributed to higher levels of net interest income and net portfolio value
in
the base case scenario at September 30, 2006 as compared to December 31,
2005 using Bancorp’s interest income simulation model. Bancorp’s interest rate
risk position was within its gap percentage total and net portfolio
value guidelines at September 30, 2006. Bancorp exceeded its net
interest income guidelines at September 30, 2006; this is primarily due to
the
receipt of the stock offering proceeds on the last business day of the quarter
which were placed in short term investments. This is a temporary situation
and will be remedied once the excess funds are
34
redeployed
into longer term assets. The interest rate risk position is monitored on
an ongoing basis and management reviews strategies to maintain all categories
within guidelines.
The
table
below sets forth examples of changes in estimated net interest income and the
estimated net portfolio value based on projected scenarios of interest rate
increases and decreases. The analyses indicate the rate risk embedded in
Bancorp’s portfolio at the dates indicated should all interest rates
instantaneously rise or fall. The results are derived by adding to or
subtracting from all current rates; however, there are certain limitations
to
these types of analyses. Rate changes are rarely instantaneous and these
analyses may also overstate the impact of short term repricings.
Net
Interest Income and Economic Value
|
||||||
Summary
Performance
|
||||||
September
30, 2006
|
||||||
Net
Interest Income
|
Net
Portfolio Value
|
|||||
Projected
Interest
|
Estimated
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Estimated
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Rate
Scenario
|
Value
|
from
Base
|
from
Base
|
Value
|
from
Base
|
from
Base
|
+
200
|
23,663
|
3,220
|
15.75%
|
80,842
|
(1,569)
|
-1.90%
|
+
100
|
22,066
|
1,623
|
7.94%
|
82,034
|
(377)
|
-0.46%
|
BASE
|
20,443
|
82,411
|
||||
-
100
|
18,707
|
(1,736)
|
-8.49%
|
82,264
|
(147)
|
-0.18%
|
-
200
|
16,790
|
(3,653)
|
-17.87%
|
80,044
|
(2,367)
|
-2.87%
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Net
Interest Income
|
Net
Portfolio Value
|
|||||
Projected
Interest
|
Estimated
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Estimated
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Rate
Scenario
|
Value
|
from
Base
|
from
Base
|
Value
|
from
Base
|
from
Base
|
+
200
|
18,650
|
2,360
|
14.49%
|
47,153
|
211
|
0.45%
|
+
100
|
17,478
|
1,188
|
7.29%
|
47,606
|
664
|
1.41%
|
BASE
|
16,290
|
|
46,942
|
|
||
-
100
|
15,115
|
(1,175)
|
-7.21%
|
45,432
|
(1,510)
|
-3.22%
|
-
200
|
13,970
|
(2,320)
|
-14.24%
|
43,239
|
(3,703)
|
-7.89%
|
35
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
Based
on
an evaluation of the effectiveness of Bancorp’s disclosure controls and
procedures performed by Bancorp’s management, with the participation of
Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer as of the end
of the period covered by this report, Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that Bancorp’s disclosure controls and
procedures have been effective.
As
used
herein, “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures
of Bancorp that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by Bancorp in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by Bancorp in the reports
that
it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to Bancorp’s management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There
were no changes in Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting
identified in connection with the evaluation described in the preceding
paragraph that occurred during Bancorp’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION.
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
Management
intends to continue Bancorp’s emphasis on growth over earnings for the
foreseeable future.
Management
has actively sought growth of the institution in recent years by opening
additional branches, initiating internal growth programs, and completing one
acquisition of a mortgage company. Bancorp may not be able to sustain its
historical rate of growth or may not even be able to continue to grow at all.
Various factors, such as economic conditions and competition, may impede or
prohibit the Bank from opening new branches. In addition, Bancorp may not be
able to obtain the financing necessary to fund additional growth and may not
be
able to find suitable candidates for acquisition. Sustaining Bancorp’s growth
has placed significant demands on management as well as on administrative,
operational and financial resources. For Bancorp to continue to grow, it must:
attract and retain qualified management and experienced bankers, find suitable
markets for expansion, find suitable, affordable branch office locations;
attract funding to
36
support
additional growth; maintain high asset quality levels; maintain adequate
regulatory capital; and maintain adequate controls. Although management
believes that earnings will increase as the franchise is expanded, earnings
are
expected to continue to be adversely affected by the costs associated with
opening new branches and the time necessary to build a customer base in each
new
branch’s market area.
If
Bancorp is unable to continue its historical levels of growth, or if growth
comes at greater financial expense than has been incurred in the past, Bancorp
may not be able to achieve its financial goals and profitability may be
adversely affected.
Because
Bancorp intends to increase its commercial real estate, construction and
commercial business loan originations, its lending risk will increase, and
downturns in the real estate market could adversely affect its
earnings.
Commercial
real estate, construction and commercial business loans generally have more
risk
than residential mortgage loans. Both commercial real estate and construction
loans, for example, often involve larger loan balances concentrated with single
borrowers or groups of related borrowers as compared to single-family
residential loans. Construction loans are secured by the property under
construction, the value of which is uncertain prior to completion. Thus, it
is
more difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete
a project and the related loan-to-value ratios. Speculative construction loans
involve additional risk because the builder does not have a contract for the
sale of the property at the time of construction.
Because
the repayment of commercial real estate, construction and commercial business
loans depends on the successful management and operation of the borrower’s
properties or related businesses, repayment of such loans can be affected by
adverse conditions in the real estate market or the local economy. A significant
portion of Bancorp’s total loan portfolio is secured by real estate located in
Fairfield County, Connecticut and Westchester County, New York. As a result,
a
downturn in the real estate market, especially within Bancorp’s market area,
could adversely impact the value of properties securing these loans. Bancorp’s
ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the underlying real estate
would be diminished, and Bancorp would be more likely to suffer losses on
defaulted loans. As its commercial real estate, construction and commercial
business loan portfolios increase, the corresponding risks and potential for
losses from these loans may also increase.
Bancorp’s
business is subject to various lending and other economic risks that could
adversely impact Bancorp’s results of operations and financial
condition.
Changes
in economic conditions, particularly an economic slowdown in Fairfield County,
Connecticut and the New York metropolitan area, could hurt Bancorp’s financial
37
performance.
Bancorp’s business is directly affected by political and market conditions,
broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes and
changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies and inflation, all of
which
are beyond Bancorp’s control. A deterioration in economic conditions, in
particular an economic slowdown within Fairfield County, Connecticut and/or
the
New York metropolitan area, could result in the following consequences, any
of
which may hurt the business of Bancorp materially: loan delinquencies may
increase; problem assets and foreclosures may increase; demand for the Bank’s
products and services may decline; and assets and collateral associated with
the
Bank’s loans, especially real estate, may decline in value, thereby reducing a
customer’s borrowing power.
The
Bank
may suffer losses in its loan portfolio despite its underwriting practices.
The
Bank seeks to mitigate the risks inherent in its loan portfolio by adhering
to
specific underwriting practices. These practices include analysis of a
borrower’s prior credit history, financial statements, tax returns and cash flow
projections, valuation of collateral based on reports of independent appraisers
and verification of liquid assets. Although the Bank believes that its
underwriting criteria is appropriate for the various types of loans the Bank
makes, the Bank may still incur losses on loans, and these losses may exceed
the
amounts set aside as reserves in the allowance for loan losses.
Bancorp’s
allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual
losses.
Like
all
financial institutions, the Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses to
provide for loan defaults and non-performance. The allowance for loan losses
may
not be adequate to cover actual loan losses and future provisions for loan
losses could materially and adversely affect Bancorp’s operating results. The
allowance for loan losses is based on an evaluation of the risks associated
with
the Bank’s loans receivable as well as the Bank’s prior loss experience. A
substantial portion of the Bank’s loans are unseasoned and lack an established
record of performance. To date, losses have been negligible. The amount of
future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other
conditions, including changes in interest rates that may be beyond the Bank’s
control and these losses may exceed current estimates. Federal regulatory
agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, review the Bank’s
loans and assess the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. While management
believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover current losses,
management cannot assure shareholders that there will not be a need to increase
the allowance for loan losses or that the regulators will not require management
to increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could materially and
adversely affect Bancorp’s earnings and profitability.
Bancorp’s
business is subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates
may
negatively affect Bancorp’s financial performance.
Bancorp
is unable to predict fluctuations of market interest rates, which are affected
by many factors including: inflation, recession, a rise in unemployment, a
tightening money
38
Mortgage
brokerage activity is also affected by interest rate fluctuations. Generally
increases in interest rates often lead to decreases in home refinancing
activity, thus reducing the number of mortgage loans that Bancorp
originates.
Bancorp’s
investment portfolio includes securities which are sensitive to interest rates
and variations in interest rates may adversely impact Bancorp’s profitability.
Bancorp’s
securities portfolio is classified as available-for-sale, and is comprised
of
mortgage-backed securities which are insured or guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies or government-sponsored enterprises, U.S. government agency securities
and money market preferred equity securities. These securities are sensitive
to
interest rate fluctuations. Unrealized gains or losses in the available-for-sale
portfolio are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. As a
result, future interest rate fluctuations may impact shareholders’ equity,
causing material fluctuations from quarter to quarter. Failure to hold its
securities until payments are received on mortgage-backed securities or until
maturity on other investments or until market conditions are favorable for
a
sale could adversely affect Bancorp’s earnings and profitability.
Bancorp
is dependent on its management team, and the loss of its senior executive
officers or other key employees could impair its relationship with its customers
and adversely affect its business and financial results.
Bancorp’s
success is dependent upon the continued services and skills of Angelo De Caro,
Charles F. Howell, Robert F. O’Connell, Philip W. Wolford and other senior
officers including Martin G. Noble, its chief lender, Marcus Zavattaro, its
residential lending sales manager, and John Kantzas, a founder and an executive
vice president. While Bancorp has employment agreements containing
non-competition provisions with Messrs. Howell, O’Connell and Zavattaro, these
agreements do not prevent any of them from terminating their employment with
Bancorp. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these
39
key
personnel could have an adverse impact on Bancorp’s business because of their
skills, knowledge of Bancorp’s market, years of industry experience and the
difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
Bancorp’s
success also depends, in part, on its continued ability to attract and retain
experienced commercial lenders and residential mortgage originators, as well
as
other management personnel. The loss of the services of several of such key
personnel could adversely affect Bancorp’s growth strategy and prospects to the
extent it is unable to replace such personnel. In the past year, Bancorp
has
hired several experienced commercial loan officers who have strong business
relationships in order to expand and enhance its current deposit and commercial
banking operations. Competition for commercial lenders and residential mortgage
originators is strong within the commercial banking and mortgage banking
industries, and Bancorp may not be successful in retaining or attracting
additional personnel necessary to maintain its growth plans.
A
breach of information security could negatively affect Bancorp’s
earnings.
Bancorp
increasingly depends upon data processing, communications and information
exchange on a variety of computing platforms and networks, and over the internet
to conduct its business. Bancorp cannot be certain that all of its systems
are
entirely free from vulnerability to attack, despite safeguards it has
instituted. In addition, Bancorp relies on the services of a variety of vendors
to meet its data processing and communication needs. If information security
is
breached, information can be lost or misappropriated; this could result in
financial loss or costs to Bancorp or damages to others. These costs or losses
could materially exceed the amount of insurance coverage, if any, which would
have an adverse effect on Bancorp’s results of operations and financial
condition. In addition, the Bank’s reputation could be harmed, which also could
materially adversely affect Bancorp’s financial condition and results of
operation.
Risks
Related to Bancorp’s industry
Strong
competition within Bancorp’s market area may limit the growth and profitability
of the Company.
Competition
in the banking and financial services industry is intense. The Fairfield County,
Connecticut and the New York City metropolitan areas have a high concentration
of financial institutions including large money center and regional banks,
community banks and credit unions. Some of Bancorp’s competitors offer products
and services that the Bank currently does not offer, such as private banking
and
trust services. The Bank’s planned purchase of a small branch in New York City,
New York and anticipated future expansion into Westchester County, New York,
will expose the Bank to more competition and in markets where it is not well
known. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and
lending limits than Bancorp and may offer certain services that it does not
or
cannot provide. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in the
40
Bank
earning less on its loans and paying more for deposits, which reduces net
interest income. Bancorp expects competition to increase in the future as a
result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes. Bancorp’s
profitability depends upon its continued ability to successfully compete in
its
market area.
Government
regulation may have an adverse effect on Bancorp’s profitability and
growth.
Bancorp
is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office
of
the Comptroller of the Currency, or the OCC, as the Bank’s chartering authority,
by the FDIC, as insurer of the deposits, and by the Federal Reserve Board
as
regulator of Bancorp. Changes in state and federal banking laws and regulations
or in federal monetary policies could adversely affect the Bank’s ability to
maintain profitability and continue to grow. For example, new legislation
or
regulation could limit the manner in which Bancorp may conduct its business,
including the Bank’s ability to obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans
and achieve satisfactory interest spreads. Many of these regulations are
intended to protect depositors, the public and the FDIC, not shareholders.
In
addition, the burden imposed by federal and state regulations may place the
Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors who are less
regulated. The laws, regulations, interpretations and enforcement policies
that
apply to Bancorp have been subject to significant, and sometimes retroactively
applied, changes in recent years, and may change significantly in the future.
Future legislation or government policy may also adversely affect the banking
industry or Bancorp’s operations.
Changing
regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure.
Recently
enacted laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and
public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations
and NASDAQ rules, are adding to the responsibilities that companies, such as
Bancorp, have. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying
interpretations, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve
over
time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which
could
make compliance more difficult and result in higher costs due to ongoing
revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Bancorp is committed to
maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As
a
result, Bancorp’s efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and
standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased
general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and
attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In
addition, during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, Bancorp will be
required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the
related regulations regarding its required assessment of its internal controls
over financial reporting and its external auditors’ audit of that assessment. In
order to prepare for this, Bancorp will need to commit significant financial
and
managerial resources beginning in 2006. If Bancorp does not effectively comply
with these laws, regulations and standards, its reputation may be
harmed.
41
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a)
|
On
July 14, 2006, the Company issued 845 shares of its common stock
to its
five outside directors. Pursuant to a policy adopted by the Board
of
Directors, outside directors serving on the board receive an annual
award
of the Company’s common stock valued at $5,000; the award is prorated for
directors who have served less than a full year. The shares have
not been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and therefore were issued
in a
private placement transaction exempt from registration under Section
4(2)
of the Securities Act. For purposes of this transaction, the Company
shares were valued at approximately $29.50 per share, or a total
value of
approximately $25,000.
|
(b)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(c)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(d)
|
Not
applicable
|
Item
6. Exhibits
No.
|
Description
|
|
2
|
Agreement
and Plan of Reorganization dated as of June 28, 1999 between Bancorp
and
the Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Bancorp’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 1999 (Commission File No.
000-29599)).
|
|
3(i)
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of Bancorp, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3(i) to
Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 1999 (Commission
File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
3(i)(A)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National
Bancorp,
Inc. dated July 16, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(A)
to
Bancorp's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,
2004 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
3(i)(B)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National
Bancorp,
Inc. dated June 15, 2006.
|
42
No.
|
Description
|
|
3(ii)
|
By-laws
of Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 1999 (Commission File
No.
000-29599)).
|
|
4
|
Reference
is made to the Rights Agreement dated April 19, 2004 by and between
Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. and Registrar and Transfer Company
filed as
Exhibit 99.2 to Bancorp’s Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2004,
which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10(a)(1)
|
2001
Stock Appreciation Rights Plan of Bancorp (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10(a)(1) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2001 (Commission File No.
000-29599)).
|
|
10(a)(3)
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2000, as amended by a First Amendment,
dated as of March 21, 2001, among the Bank, Bancorp and Charles F.
Howell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(4) to Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000 (Commission
File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
10(a)(4)
|
Change
of Control Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2001 between Martin G. Noble
and
Patriot National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(4)
to
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2004 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
10(a)(5)
|
Employment
Agreement dated as of November 3, 2003 among Patriot National Bank,
Bancorp and Robert F. O’Connell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(a)(5) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
10(a)(6)
|
Change
of Control Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2003 between
Robert F. O’Connell and Patriot National Bank (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(a)(6) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2003 (Commission File No.
000-29599)).
|
43
No.
|
Description
|
|
10(a)(8)
|
Employment
Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 between Patriot National Bank
and
Marcus Zavattaro (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(8) to
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2005 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
10(a)(9)
|
License
agreement dated July 1, 2003 between Patriot National Bank and L.
Morris
Glucksman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(9) to Bancorp’s
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
(Commission File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
10(a)(10)
|
Employment
Agreement dated as of October 23, 2003 among the Bank, Bancorp and
Charles
F. Howell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(10) to Bancorp’s
Annual Report on form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
(Commission file No. 000-29599)).
|
|
10(a)(11)
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Change of control Agreement, dated
March
30, 2006, between Robert F. O’Connell and Patriot National Bank
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(11) to Bancorp’s Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (Commission File
No. 000-29599)).
|
|
10(a)(12)
|
2005
Director Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(12)
to Bancorp’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2006 (Commission File No. 000-295999)).
|
|
10(c)
|
1999
Stock Option Plan of the Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(c)
to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 1999 (Commission
File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
14
|
Code
of Conduct for Senior Financial Officers (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 14 to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (Commission File No.
000-29599).
|
44
No.
|
Description
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
of Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999 (Commission
File No. 000-29599)).
|
|
31(1)
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
31(2)
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
32
|
Section
1350 Certifications
|
|
45
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
Patriot
National Bancorp, inc.
|
|
Registrant)
|
|
By:
/s/
Robert F. O’Connell
|
|
Robert
F. O’Connell,
|
|
Senior
Executive Vice President
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
(On
behalf of the registrant and as
|
|
chief
financial officer)
|
|
November
14, 2006
|
46