PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST - Quarter Report: 2022 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
☒ Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022
or
☐ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-6300
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania |
|
23-6216339 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000 Philadelphia, PA |
|
19103 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (215) 875-0700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of Exchange on which registered |
Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $1.00 per share |
PEI |
New York Stock Exchange |
Series B Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share |
PEIPrB |
New York Stock Exchange |
Series C Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share |
PEIPrC |
New York Stock Exchange |
Series D Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share |
PEIPrD |
New York Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Accelerated filer |
☒ |
Non-accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
☒ |
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. On May 4, 2022, 80,612,437 shares of beneficial interest, par value $1.00 per share, of the Registrant were outstanding.
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page |
|
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets—March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations—Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss—Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Equity—Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
22 |
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Not Applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Not Applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
Except as the context otherwise requires, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company” and “PREIT” refer to Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and its subsidiaries, including our operating partnership, PREIT Associates, L.P. References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “PREIT Associates” or the “Operating Partnership” refer to PREIT Associates, L.P.
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
March 31, 2022 |
|
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
||
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating properties |
|
$ |
3,113,736 |
|
|
$ |
3,156,194 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
45,146 |
|
|
|
45,828 |
|
Land held for development |
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
Total investments in real estate |
|
|
3,163,221 |
|
|
|
3,206,361 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,417,522 |
) |
|
|
(1,405,260 |
) |
Net investments in real estate |
|
|
1,745,699 |
|
|
|
1,801,101 |
|
INVESTMENTS IN PARTNERSHIPS, at equity: |
|
|
12,749 |
|
|
|
16,525 |
|
OTHER ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
45,554 |
|
|
|
43,852 |
|
Tenant and other receivables |
|
|
36,036 |
|
|
|
42,501 |
|
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $21,900 and $21,598 at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively) |
|
|
9,752 |
|
|
|
10,054 |
|
Deferred costs and other assets, net |
|
|
123,957 |
|
|
|
128,923 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
42,416 |
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,016,163 |
|
|
$ |
2,051,736 |
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage loans payable, net |
|
$ |
844,987 |
|
|
$ |
851,283 |
|
Term Loans, net |
|
|
971,761 |
|
|
|
959,137 |
|
Revolving Facilities |
|
|
53,818 |
|
|
|
54,549 |
|
Tenants’ deposits and deferred rent |
|
|
11,177 |
|
|
|
10,180 |
|
Distributions in excess of partnership investments |
|
|
69,344 |
|
|
|
71,570 |
|
Fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
8,427 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
77,319 |
|
|
|
89,543 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,031,019 |
|
|
|
2,044,689 |
|
AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Series B Preferred Shares, $.01 par value per share; 25,000 shares authorized; 3,450 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $97,381 and $95,791 at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Series C Preferred Shares, $.01 par value per share; 25,000 shares authorized; 6,900 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $194,235 and $191,130 at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Series D Preferred Shares, $.01 par value per share; 25,000 shares authorized; 5,000 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $140,040 and $137,891 at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Shares of beneficial interest, $1.00 par value per share; 200,000 shares authorized; 80,617 and 80,200 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively |
|
|
80,617 |
|
|
|
80,200 |
|
Capital contributed in excess of par |
|
|
1,781,859 |
|
|
|
1,777,013 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,096 |
) |
|
|
(8,830 |
) |
Distributions in excess of net income |
|
|
(1,864,844 |
) |
|
|
(1,832,375 |
) |
Total equity (deficit) – Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust |
|
|
(5,310 |
) |
|
|
16,162 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(9,546 |
) |
|
|
(9,115 |
) |
Total equity (deficit) |
|
|
(14,856 |
) |
|
|
7,047 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,016,163 |
|
|
$ |
2,051,736 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lease revenue |
|
$ |
63,440 |
|
|
$ |
59,908 |
|
Expense reimbursements |
|
|
4,144 |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
Other real estate revenue |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
Total real estate revenue |
|
|
69,194 |
|
|
|
65,278 |
|
Other income |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
69,435 |
|
|
|
65,403 |
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CAM and real estate taxes |
|
|
(27,872 |
) |
|
|
(27,831 |
) |
Utilities |
|
|
(3,561 |
) |
|
|
(2,964 |
) |
Other property operating expenses |
|
|
(2,140 |
) |
|
|
(2,364 |
) |
Total property operating expenses |
|
|
(33,573 |
) |
|
|
(33,159 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(29,110 |
) |
|
|
(29,839 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(11,483 |
) |
|
|
(11,831 |
) |
Provision for employee separation expenses |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
Project costs and other expenses |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
(74,310 |
) |
|
|
(75,022 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(31,391 |
) |
|
|
(30,731 |
) |
Reorganization expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
Total expenses |
|
|
(105,701 |
) |
|
|
(105,950 |
) |
Loss before equity in loss of partnerships and gain on sale of preferred equity interest |
|
|
(36,266 |
) |
|
|
(40,547 |
) |
Equity in loss of partnerships |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
(3,433 |
) |
Gain on sale of preferred equity interest |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(32,973 |
) |
|
|
(43,980 |
) |
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Net loss attributable to PREIT |
|
|
(32,469 |
) |
|
|
(42,746 |
) |
Less: preferred share dividends |
|
|
(6,844 |
) |
|
|
(6,844 |
) |
Net loss attributable to PREIT common shareholders |
|
$ |
(39,313 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,590 |
) |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(32,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,980 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Preferred share dividends |
|
|
(6,844 |
) |
|
|
(6,844 |
) |
Net loss used to calculate loss per share—basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(39,313 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,590 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share: |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
(in thousands of shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic |
|
|
79,577 |
|
|
|
77,647 |
|
Effect of common share equivalents(1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted |
|
|
79,577 |
|
|
|
77,647 |
|
(1) The Company had net losses used to calculate earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. Therefore, the effects of common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for these periods because they would be antidilutive.
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(32,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,980 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives |
|
|
5,807 |
|
|
|
2,601 |
|
Amortization of settled swaps |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
(27,166 |
) |
|
|
(41,376 |
) |
Less: comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to PREIT |
|
$ |
(26,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,206 |
) |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 and 2021
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
PREIT Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares $.01 par |
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
Non- |
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts) |
|
Total |
|
|
Series |
|
|
Series |
|
|
Series |
|
|
Interest, |
|
|
in Excess of |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
in Excess of |
|
|
controlling |
|
|||||||||
Balance January 1, 2022 |
|
$ |
7,047 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
80,200 |
|
|
$ |
1,777,013 |
|
|
$ |
(8,830 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,832,375 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,115 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(32,973 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(32,469 |
) |
|
|
(504 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
5,807 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Shares issued under employee compensation plan, net of shares retired |
|
|
4,449 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Balance March 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
(14,856 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
80,617 |
|
|
$ |
1,781,859 |
|
|
$ |
(3,096 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,864,844 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
PREIT Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares $.01 par |
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
Non- |
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts) |
|
Total |
|
|
Series |
|
|
Series |
|
|
Series |
|
|
Interest, |
|
|
in Excess of |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
in Excess of |
|
|
controlling |
|
|||||||||
Balance January 1, 2021 |
|
$ |
126,940 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
79,537 |
|
|
$ |
1,771,777 |
|
|
$ |
(20,620 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,699,638 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,270 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(43,980 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(42,746 |
) |
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Shares issued under employee compensation |
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Balance March 31, 2021 |
|
$ |
86,238 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
79,260 |
|
|
$ |
1,772,728 |
|
|
$ |
(18,080 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,742,384 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,440 |
) |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(32,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,980 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation |
|
|
27,436 |
|
|
|
28,149 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
Straight-line rent adjustments |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
1,321 |
|
Gain on sale of preferred equity interest |
|
|
(3,688 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Paid-in-kind interest |
|
|
12,547 |
|
|
|
11,514 |
|
Gain on hedge ineffectiveness |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
Equity in loss (income) of partnerships |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
3,433 |
|
Cash distributions from partnerships |
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net change in other assets |
|
|
7,161 |
|
|
|
18,805 |
|
Net change in other liabilities |
|
|
(6,209 |
) |
|
|
(3,860 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8,454 |
|
|
|
16,226 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments in real estate improvements |
|
|
(2,746 |
) |
|
|
(1,928 |
) |
Additions to construction in progress |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
Investments in partnerships |
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Capitalized leasing costs |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from sale of preferred equity interest |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Additions to leasehold improvements and corporate fixed assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
|
|
(2,966 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net repayments under the Restructured Revolver |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net repayments to term loans |
|
|
(2,437 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Repayments of finance lease liabilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
Principal installments on mortgage loans |
|
|
(6,048 |
) |
|
|
(9,505 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
Value of shares retired under equity incentive plans, net of shares issued |
|
|
5,427 |
|
|
|
(647 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(3,293 |
) |
|
|
(10,575 |
) |
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash |
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period |
|
|
58,077 |
|
|
|
51,231 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period |
|
$ |
61,101 |
|
|
$ |
53,916 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2022
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Nature of Operations
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (“PREIT” or the “Company”) prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the included disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Our unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. In our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position, the consolidated results of our operations, consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, consolidated statements of equity and our consolidated statements of cash flows are included. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
PREIT, a Pennsylvania business trust founded in 1960 and one of the first equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) in the United States, has a primary investment focus on retail shopping malls located in the eastern half of the United States, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region. As of March 31, 2022, our portfolio consists of a total of 25 properties operating in nine states, including 20 shopping malls, four other retail properties and one development property. The property in our portfolio that is classified as under development does not currently have any activity occurring.
We hold our interest in our portfolio of properties through our operating partnership, PREIT Associates, L.P. (“PREIT Associates” or the “Operating Partnership”). We are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of March 31, 2022, we held a 98.7% controlling interest in the Operating Partnership and consolidated it for reporting purposes. The presentation of consolidated financial statements does not itself imply that the assets of any consolidated entity (including any special-purpose entity formed for a particular project) are available to pay the liabilities of any other consolidated entity, or that the liabilities of any consolidated entity (including any special-purpose entity formed for a particular project) are obligations of any other consolidated entity.
Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, each of the limited partners has the right to redeem such partner’s units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) for cash or, at our election, we may acquire such OP Units in exchange for our common shares on a one-for-one basis, in some cases beginning one year following the respective issue date of the OP Units and in other cases immediately. If all of the outstanding OP Units held by limited partners had been redeemed for cash as of March 31, 2022, the total amount that would have been distributed would have been $0.6 million based on the number of outstanding OP Units held by limited partners of 1,030,510 as of March 31, 2022. The current terms of our credit agreements prohibit the Company from acquiring whole share OP Units for cash and, as such, any whole share OP Units presented for redemption will be redeemed for shares. Partial share OP Unit redemptions will be redeemed for cash.
We provide management, leasing and real estate development services through two of our subsidiaries: PREIT Services, LLC (“PREIT Services”), which generally develops and manages properties that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes, and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. (“PRI”), which generally develops and manages properties that we do not consolidate for financial reporting purposes, including properties owned by partnerships in which we own an interest, and properties that are owned by third parties in which we do not have an interest. PREIT Services and PRI are consolidated. PRI is a taxable REIT subsidiary, as defined by federal tax laws, which means that it is able to offer an expanded menu of services to tenants without jeopardizing our continuing qualification as a REIT under federal tax law.
We evaluate operating results and allocate resources on a property-by-property basis, and do not distinguish or evaluate our consolidated operations on a geographic basis. Due to the nature of our operating properties, which involve retail shopping, dining, entertainment and certain non-traditional tenant operations, we have concluded that our individual properties have similar economic characteristics and meet all other aggregation criteria. Accordingly, we have aggregated our individual properties into one reportable segment. In addition, no single tenant accounts for 10% or more of consolidated revenue, and none of our properties are located outside the United States.
COVID-19 Related Risks and Uncertainties
The COVID-19 global pandemic that began in 2020 has adversely impacted and continues to impact our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results, as well as our tenants’ businesses. The prolonged evolution of the pandemic has also led to periods of unprecedented global economic disruption and volatility in financial markets. Some of our tenants’ financial health and business viability have been adversely impacted and their creditworthiness has deteriorated. We anticipate that our future business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, including in 2022 and potentially in future periods, will continue to be materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although
7
we have operated in the COVID-19 environment for approximately two years, uncertainty remains as to how long the global pandemic, economic challenges and various limitations and disruptions to business operations will continue to impact us or our tenants.
COVID-19 closures of our properties began on March 12, 2020 and continued through the reopening of our last property on July 3, 2020; all of our properties have remained open since that time and are employing safety and sanitation measures designed to address the risks posed by COVID-19. Despite the increased vaccination rates in the country, some of our tenants are still operating at reduced capacity. The significance of the prolonged pandemic on our business, however, will continue to depend on, among other things, the resurgences of outbreaks, the severity of the disease and the number of people infected with the virus, and certain variants thereof, vaccination rates in regions in which our properties are located, further effects on the economy of the pandemic and of the measures taken by governmental authorities and other third parties restricting daily activities and the length of time that such measures remain in place or are renewed, implementation of governmental programs to assist businesses and consumers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the effect of any changes to current restrictions or recommended protocols, all of which could vary by geographic region in which our properties are located. We continue to experience uncertainty as to whether government authorities will maintain the relaxation of current restrictions on businesses in the regions in which our properties are located, and whether government authorities will issue recommendations or impose requirements on landlords like us to further enhance health and safety protocols, or whether we will voluntarily adopt any of these requirements ourselves, which could result in increased operating costs and demands on our property management teams to ensure compliance with any of these requirements.
Going Concern Considerations
Under the accounting guidance related to the presentation of financial statements, when preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, management has the responsibility to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. As a result of the considerations articulated below, we believe there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued.
In applying the accounting guidance, management considered our current financial condition and liquidity sources, including current funds available, forecasted future cash flows and our conditional and unconditional obligations due over the next twelve months. Management specifically considered Fashion District Philadelphia’s Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (“FDP Loan Agreement”), which matures in January 2023 and includes a quarterly covenant provision as an event or condition that raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
The FDP Loan Agreement has a balance of $194.6 million at March 31, 2022, and matures in , with an option to extend maturity to January 2024. This agreement also contains a 10% quarterly debt yield covenant which began on December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, the FDP joint venture entity borrower, PM Gallery L.P., did not meet the minimum 10% debt yield covenant, which triggered the lender to sweep cash from the property. This is not an event of default. As of June 30, 2022, the debt yield covenant threshold will be 9%, subsequent to which the joint venture would be required to pay down the term loan to achieve a 9% debt yield. Based on the joint venture’s current forecast, management projects that the joint venture will not be able to meet this covenant as the debt yield is projected to be under 9%. To the extent the term loan is not paid down by the joint venture, this term loan could become due and payable during the second half of 2022. The Company guarantees 50% of the joint venture’s obligations under the FDP Loan Agreement and management projects that the Company would not be able to satisfy its obligations if the FDP term loan would become due and payable in 2022. The Company plans to work with its joint venture partner to satisfy any obligations coming due under the FDP Loan Agreement should it become due and payable as a result of the joint venture not meeting the debt yield covenant.
However, our ability to satisfy obligations under the FDP Loan Agreement depends primarily on management’s ability to obtain relief from the joint venture’s lender in regard to the Company’s guarantee of 50% of the outstanding debt balance. Obtaining relief from the FDP Loan Agreement lender involves performance by third parties and therefore cannot be considered probable of occurring. Therefore, due to the inherent risks, unknown results and significant uncertainties associated with this matter and the direct correlation to our ability to satisfy our financial obligations that may arise over the applicable twelve month period, we are unable to conclude that it is probable that we will be able to meet our obligations arising within twelve months of the date of issuance of these financial statements under the parameters set forth in this accounting guidance.
Fair Value
Fair value accounting applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements. Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, these accounting requirements establish a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the
8
reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. We utilize the fair value hierarchy in our accounting for derivatives (Level 2) and financial instruments (Level 2) and in our reviews for impairment of real estate assets (Level 3) and goodwill (Level 3).
Impairment of Assets
Real estate investments and related intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property might not be recoverable, which is referred to as a “triggering event.” During the first quarter of 2022, certain of our properties had triggering events due to various indicators of impairment, however, based on our assessment of the undiscounted future cash flows, we did not identify any impairments. In connection with our review of our long-lived assets for impairment, we utilize qualitative and quantitative factors in order to estimate fair value. The significant qualitative factors that we use include age and condition of the property, market conditions in the property’s trade area, competition with other shopping centers within the property’s trade area and the creditworthiness and performance of the property’s tenants. The significant quantitative factors that we use include historical and forecasted financial and operating information relating to the property, such as net operating income, estimated holding periods, occupancy statistics, vacancy projections and tenants’ sales levels.
If there is a triggering event in relation to a property to be held and used, we will estimate the aggregate future cash flows, net of estimated capital expenditures, to be generated by the property, undiscounted and without interest charges. In addition, this estimate may consider a probability weighted cash flow estimation approach when alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration or when a range of possible values is estimated.
The determination of undiscounted cash flows requires significant estimates by our management, including the expected course of action at the balance sheet date that would lead to such cash flows. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in the anticipated action to be taken with respect to the property could affect the determination of whether an impairment exists, and the effects of such changes could materially affect our net income. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, the carrying value is written down to its fair value. We intend to hold and operate our properties long-term, which reduces the likelihood that our carrying value is not recoverable. A shortened holding period would increase the likelihood that the carrying value is not recoverable.
Assessment of our ability to recover certain lease-related costs must be made when we have a reason to believe that a tenant might not be able to perform under the terms of the lease as originally expected. This requires us to make estimates as to the recoverability of such costs.
An other-than-temporary impairment of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture is recognized when the carrying value of the investment is not considered recoverable based on evaluation of the severity and duration of the decline in value. To the extent impairment has occurred, the excess carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value is recorded as a reduction to income.
Assets Classified as Held for Sale
The determination to classify an asset as held for sale requires significant estimates by us about the property and the expected market for the property, which are based on factors including recent sales of comparable properties, recent expressions of interest in the property, financial metrics of the property and the physical condition of the property. We must also determine if it will be possible under those market conditions to sell the property for an acceptable price within one year. When assets are identified by our management as held for sale, we discontinue depreciating the assets and estimate the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. We generally consider operating properties to be held for sale when they meet criteria such as whether the sale transaction has been approved by the appropriate level of management and there are no known material contingencies relating to the sale such that the sale is probable and is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year. If the expected net sales price of the asset that has been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the asset, the asset is written down to fair value less the cost to sell. Assets and liabilities related to assets classified as held for sale are presented separately in the consolidated balance sheets. If we determine that a property no longer meets the held-for-sale criteria, we reclassify the property’s assets and liabilities to their original locations on the consolidated balance sheet and record depreciation and amortization expense for the period that the property was in held-for-sale status.
9
As of March 31, 2022, we determined that two of our hotel land parcels, three of our multifamily land parcels, one vacant anchor box space and one retail property met the criteria to be classified as held for sale. As of December 31, 2021, we determined that two of our hotel land parcels, two of our multifamily land parcels and vacant anchor box space met the criteria to be classified as held for sale.
Share-Based Compensation
On March 4, 2022, the Company approved the 2022-2024 Equity Award Program design (the “Program”). Having approved the Program, the Company made long term incentive plan awards in the form of performance-based restricted share units (“PSUs”) and time-based restricted share units (“RSUs”) consisting of 4,838,184 RSUs and 3,548,708 PSUs. The grants of PSUs and RSUs were made pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2018 Equity Incentive Plan”). The settlement of RSUs or PSUs may be made in cash or shares as determined by the Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee. As such, these awards are accounted for as liability awards and remeasured at fair value each reporting period. The liability for these awards is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and compensation cost is recorded ratably over the respective vesting periods.
Under the Program, the number of common shares to be issued by the Company with respect to the PSUs, if any, depends on the Company’s achievement of certain specified operating performance measures and a modification based on total shareholder return (“TSR”) for the three-year period beginning January 1, 2022 and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2024 or the date of a change in control of the Company (the “Measurement Period”).
The preliminary number of common shares to be issued by the Company with respect to the PSUs awarded is based on a multiple determined by achievement of certain specified operating performance measures during the Measurement Period. These performance measures, the three-year core mall sales per square foot, three-year average quarterly core mall total occupancy and the three-year corporate debt yield, are each weighted 33.3%. The Committee approved minimum, target and maximum performance levels for both measures. For all participants, the minimum performance level will have a 0.5 multiplier, the target performance level will have a 1.0 multiplier and the maximum performance level will have a 2.0 multiplier. The preliminary number of common shares to be issued by the Company as determined under the operating performance goals will be adjusted, upwards or downwards, depending on the Company’s TSR performance over the Measurement Period relative to the TSR performance of other real estate investment trusts comprising a leading index of retail real estate investment trusts. Dividends, if any, on the Company’s common shares are deemed to be paid with respect to PSUs and credited to the PSU accounts and applied to “acquire” more PSUs at the 20-day average closing price per common share ending on the dividend payment date.
With respect to the portion of the long-term incentive awards made in the form of RSUs, the RSUs generally will vest in three equal annual installments for all grants except director grants and two equal installments for the Company’s directors commencing on March 4, 2023, subject to continued employment. During the period that the RSUs have not vested, the holder will have no rights as a shareholder with respect to the RSUs; however, dividends, if any, on the Company’s common shares are deemed to be paid with respect to RSUs and credited to the RSU accounts and applied to “acquire” more RSUs at the 20-day average closing price per common share ending on the dividend payment date.
New Accounting Developments
In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers (Topic 805), which provides amendments to address diversity and inconsistency related to the recognition and measurement of contract assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination. Amendments require that an acquirer recognize and measure contract assets/liabilities acquired in a business combination in accordance with Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. While this standard is not in effect at this time, the Company will evaluate and implement if applicable.
2. REAL ESTATE ACTIVITIES
Investments in real estate as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 were comprised of the following:
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
March 31, 2022 |
|
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
||
Buildings, improvements and construction in progress |
|
$ |
2,740,712 |
|
|
$ |
2,762,675 |
|
Land, including land held for development |
|
|
422,509 |
|
|
|
443,686 |
|
Total investments in real estate |
|
|
3,163,221 |
|
|
|
3,206,361 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,417,522 |
) |
|
|
(1,405,260 |
) |
Net investments in real estate |
|
$ |
1,745,699 |
|
|
$ |
1,801,101 |
|
10
Capitalization of Costs
The following table summarizes our capitalized interest, compensation, including commissions, and real estate taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Development/Redevelopment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest (1) |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
Compensation |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Leasing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Compensation, including commissions (2) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
— |
|
(1) Includes interest capitalized on investments in partnerships under development.
(2) The definition of initial direct costs under ASC 842 includes only those incremental costs of a lease that would not have been incurred if the lease had not been obtained. Commissions paid for successful leasing transactions continue to be capitalized.
Impairment of Assets
Exton Square Mall
In conjunction with the preparation of our 2021 annual financial statements, we identified a triggering event at Exton Square Mall in Exton, Pennsylvania as a result of our determination to decrease the holding period of the property. This led us to conduct an analysis of possible impairment at the property and, during the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a loss on impairment of assets of approximately $8.4 million. In March 2022, we executed a purchase and sale agreement for Exton Square Mall for $27.5 million, which includes an initial amount of $8.0 million towards the residential land parcel that is under contract. As a result, Exton Square Mall met the criteria to be classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2022.
Disposition
Valley View Mall Derecognition
In August 2020, a court order assigned a receiver to operate Valley View Mall in La Crosse, Wisconsin on behalf of the lender of the mortgage loan secured by the property. Although we have not yet conveyed the property because foreclosure proceedings are ongoing, we no longer control or operate the property as a result of court order assigning the receiver. In September 2020, a court order was issued to conduct a foreclosure sale of the property and as a result we have no further operating liabilities from the property. As a result of our loss of control of the property, we derecognized the property and recorded an offsetting contract asset and recognized a gain on derecognition of property of $8.1 million in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. The contract asset is included in deferred costs and other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. The mortgage principal balance was $27.2 million at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, which we continue to recognize until the foreclosure process is completed. The derecognition of Valley View Mall and its related assets was a non-cash conversion of assets, which had no impact on the Company’s cash flows. In May 2022, the foreclosure proceedings were completed.
Other Property Disposition
In February 2022, we completed the redemption of preferred equity issued as part of a previous sale of our New Garden land parcel. In connection with this settlement, we received approximately $2.5 million, which funds were used to pay down our First Lien Revolving Facility and First Lien Term Loan. In connection with this transaction, we recorded a gain on sale of preferred equity of $3.7 million in the three months ended March, 31 2022.
11
3. INVESTMENTS IN PARTNERSHIPS
The following table presents summarized financial information of the equity investments in our unconsolidated partnerships as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
_____________________
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
March 31, 2022 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments in real estate, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating properties |
|
$ |
850,817 |
|
|
$ |
847,560 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
6,456 |
|
Total investments in real estate |
|
|
854,351 |
|
|
|
854,016 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(252,849 |
) |
|
|
(247,133 |
) |
Net investments in real estate |
|
|
601,502 |
|
|
|
606,883 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
66,294 |
|
|
|
59,004 |
|
Deferred costs and other assets, net |
|
|
155,722 |
|
|
|
155,247 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
823,518 |
|
|
|
821,134 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ INVESTMENT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage loans payable, net |
|
|
491,957 |
|
|
|
493,904 |
|
FDP Term Loan, net |
|
|
194,602 |
|
|
|
194,602 |
|
Partnership Loan |
|
|
118,560 |
|
|
|
115,543 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
145,691 |
|
|
|
141,619 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
950,810 |
|
|
|
945,668 |
|
Net investment |
|
|
(127,292 |
) |
|
|
(124,534 |
) |
Partners’ share |
|
|
(63,893 |
) |
|
|
(62,771 |
) |
PREIT’s share |
|
|
(63,399 |
) |
|
|
(61,763 |
) |
Excess investment (1) |
|
|
6,804 |
|
|
|
6,718 |
|
Net investments and advances |
|
$ |
(56,595 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,045 |
) |
Investment in partnerships, at equity |
|
$ |
12,749 |
|
|
$ |
16,525 |
|
Distributions in excess of partnership investments |
|
|
(69,344 |
) |
|
|
(71,570 |
) |
Net investments and advances |
|
$ |
(56,595 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,045 |
) |
(1)Excess investment represents the unamortized difference between our investment and our share of the equity in the underlying net investment in the unconsolidated partnerships. The excess investment is amortized over the life of the properties, and the amortization is included in “Equity in loss of partnerships.”
We record distributions from our equity investments using the nature of the distribution approach.
12
The following table summarizes our share of equity in (loss) income of partnerships for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Real estate revenue |
|
$ |
29,889 |
|
|
$ |
24,900 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property operating and other expenses |
|
|
(11,874 |
) |
|
|
(13,739 |
) |
Interest expense (1) |
|
|
(11,754 |
) |
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(6,655 |
) |
|
|
(6,930 |
) |
Total expenses |
|
|
(30,283 |
) |
|
|
(31,373 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(6,473 |
) |
Less: Partners’ share |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3,096 |
|
PREIT’s share |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
(3,377 |
) |
Amortization of excess investment |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
Equity in loss of partnerships |
|
$ |
(395 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,433 |
) |
(1) Net of capitalized interest expense of $0 and $103 for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Fashion District Philadelphia
FDP Loan Agreement
PM Gallery LP, a Delaware limited partnership and joint venture entity owned indirectly by us and The Macerich Company (“Macerich”), previously entered into a $250.0 million term loan in January 2018 (as amended in July 2019 to increase the total maximum potential borrowings to $350.0 million) to fund the ongoing redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia and to repay capital contributions to the venture previously made by the partners. A total of $51.0 million was drawn during the third quarter of 2019 and we received aggregate distributions of $25.0 million as our share of the draws. On December 10, 2020, PM Gallery LP, together with certain other subsidiaries owned indirectly by us and Macerich (including the fee and leasehold owners of the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project), entered into an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (the “FDP Loan Agreement”). In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, a $100.0 million principal payment was made (and funded indirectly by Macerich, the “Partnership Loan”) to pay down the existing loan, reducing the outstanding principal under the FDP Loan Agreement from $301.0 million to $201.0 million. The joint venture must repay the Partnership Loan plus 15% accrued interest to Macerich, in its capacity as the lender, prior to the resumption of 50/50 cash distributions to the Company and its joint venture partner.
The FDP Loan Agreement provides for (i) a maturity date of January 22, 2023, with the potential for a one-year extension upon the borrowers’ satisfaction of certain conditions, (ii) an interest rate at the borrowers’ option with respect to each advance of either (A) the Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.00%) plus 2.50% or (B) LIBOR for the applicable period plus 3.50%, (iii) a full recourse guarantee of 50% of the borrowers’ obligations by PREIT Associates, L.P., on a several basis, (iv) a full recourse guarantee of certain of the borrowers’ obligations by The Macerich Partnership, L.P., up to a maximum of $50.0 million, on a several basis, (v) a pledge of the equity interests of certain indirect subsidiaries of PREIT and Macerich, as well as of PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. and one of its subsidiaries, that have a direct or indirect ownership interest in the borrowers, (vi) a non-recourse carve-out guaranty and a hazardous materials indemnity by each of PREIT Associates, L.P. and The Macerich Partnership, L.P., and (vii) mortgages of the borrowers’ fee and leasehold interests in the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project and certain other properties. The FDP Loan Agreement contains certain covenants typical for loans of its type. We anticipate that the joint venture will not meet certain financial covenants applicable under the FDP Loan Agreement during 2022. See Going Concern Considerations section in Note 1.
Joint Venture
In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, the governing structure of PM Gallery LP was modified such that, effective as of January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the entity’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions. The Company considered the changes to the governing structure of PM Gallery LP and determined the investment qualifies as a variable interest entity and will continue to be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Our maximum exposure to losses is limited to the extent of our investment, which is a 50% ownership.
Mortgage Loan Activity
Gloucester Premium Outlets
On March 1, 2022, the Company’s unconsolidated subsidiary exercised its one-year extension option of its mortgage loan securing its property at Gloucester Premium Outlets. The $86.0 million loan maturing on March 1, 2023 has a variable interest rate.
Pavilion at Market East
13
During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the Company’s unconsolidated subsidiary received an extension of its mortgage securing Pavilion at Market East for an additional three months to May 2021. On May 25, 2021, the Company’s unconsolidated subsidiary completed a refinance of its mortgage loan securing its property at Pavilion at Market East. The $7.6 million mortgage has a 2-year term, maturing in . The loan has interest only payments until May 2022 at a variable rate of the greater of (a) one month LIBOR plus 3.5% or (b) 4.0%.
4. FINANCING ACTIVITY
Credit Agreements
On December 10, 2020 we entered into two secured credit agreements (collectively, as amended, the “Credit Agreements”): (a) an Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement (the “First Lien Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo Bank”) and the other financial institutions signatory thereto and their assignees, for secured loan facilities consisting of: (i) a secured first lien revolving credit facility allowing for borrowings up to $130.0 million, including a sub-facility for letters of credit to be issued thereunder in an aggregate stated amount of up to $10.0 million (collectively, the “First Lien Revolving Facility”), and (ii) a $384.5 million secured first lien term loan facility (the “First Lien Term Loan Facility”), and (b) a Second Lien Credit Agreement (the “Second Lien Credit Agreement”), as amended February 8, 2021 with Wells Fargo Bank and the other financial institutions signatory thereto and their assignees for a $535.2 million secured second lien term loan facility (the “Second Lien Term Loan Facility”). The Credit Agreements mature in December 2022. The First Lien Term Loan Facility and the Second Lien Term Loan Facility are collectively referred to as the “Term Loans.” The Credit Agreements refinanced our previously existing secured term loan under the Credit Agreement dated as of August 11, 2020 (as amended, the “Bridge Credit Agreement”), our Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement entered into on January 8, 2014 (as amended, the “7-Year Term Loan”), and our 2018 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement entered into on May 24, 2018 (as amended, the “2018 Credit Agreement” and collectively with the Bridge Credit Agreement and the 7-Year Term Loan, the “Restructured Credit Agreements”). Upon our entry into the Credit Agreements, the Bridge Credit Agreement, the 7-Year Term Loan and the 2018 Credit Agreement were cancelled.
As of March 31, 2022, we had borrowed $976.5 million under the Term Loans and $53.8 million under the First Lien Revolving Facility. The carrying value of the Term Loans on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2022 is net of $4.8 million of unamortized debt issuance costs. The maximum amount that was available to us under the First Lien Revolving Facility as of March 31, 2022 was $76.2 million.
On April 13, 2021, we entered into Agency Resignation, Appointment, Acceptance and Waiver Agreements pursuant to which Wells Fargo Bank resigned as Administrative Agent and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB was appointed successor Administrative Agent under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the Second Lien Credit Agreement and, in each case, the related loan documents. There is currently no successor letter of credit issuer under the First Lien Revolving Facility, accordingly, the Company cannot currently access the letters of credit sub-facility.
Interest expense and deferred financing fee amortization related to the Credit Agreements and the Restructured Credit Agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
||
Revolving Facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense (1) |
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
Deferred financing amortization |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
Term Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense (2) |
|
|
20,448 |
|
|
|
20,421 |
|
|
Deferred financing amortization |
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
Our obligations under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries. Our obligations under the Credit Agreements and the guaranties are secured by mortgages and deeds of trust on a portfolio of 12 of our subsidiaries’ properties, including nine malls and three additional parcels. The obligations are further secured by a lien on substantially all of our personal property pursuant to collateral agreements and a pledge of substantially all of the equity interests held by us and the guarantors, pursuant to pledge agreements, in each case subject to limited exceptions.
The Credit Agreements each provide for a two-year maturity of December 2022 (the “Maturity Date”), subject to a one-year extension to December 2023 at the borrowers’ option, subject to (i) minimum liquidity of $35.0 million, (ii) a minimum corporate debt yield of 8.0%, (iii) a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 105% for the total first lien and second lien loans and letters of credit and the Borrowing Base Properties as determined by an appraisal and (iv) no default or event of default existing and our representations and warranties being true in all material respects. The loans under the Credit Agreements are repayable in full on the Maturity Date, subject to mandatory prepayment provisions in the event of certain events including asset sales, incurrence of indebtedness, issuances of equity and receipt of casualty insurance proceeds. The terms of our Credit Agreements place restrictions on, among other things, and subject to certain exceptions, our ability to make certain restricted payments (including payments of dividends), make certain types of investments and acquisitions, issue redeemable securities, incur
14
additional indebtedness, incur liens on our assets, enter into agreements with a negative pledge, make certain intercompany transfers, merge, consolidate, or sell our assets or the equity interests in our subsidiaries, amend our organizational documents or material contracts, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, or enter into derivatives contracts. Additionally, if we receive net cash proceeds from certain capital events (including equity issuances), we are required to prepay loans under our Credit Agreements. In addition, the Credit Agreements contain cross-default provisions that trigger an event of default if we fail to make certain payments or otherwise fail to comply with our obligations with respect to certain of our other indebtedness.
First Lien Credit Agreement
Amounts borrowed under the First Lien Credit Agreement may be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bear interest at the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate will not be less than 1.50% per annum, in each case plus (w) for revolving loans, 2.50% per annum, and (x) for term loans, 4.74% per annum. LIBOR Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus (y) for revolving loans, 3.50% per annum, and (z) for term loans, 5.74% per annum, in each case, provided that LIBOR will not be less than 0.50% per annum. Interest is due to be paid in cash on the last day of each applicable interest period (with rolling 30-day interest periods) and on the Maturity Date. We are required to pay certain fees to the administrative agent for the account of the lenders in connection with the First Lien Credit Agreement, including an unused fee for the account of the revolving lenders, which will accrue (i) 0.35% per annum on the daily amount of the unused revolving commitments when that amount is greater than or equal to 50% of the aggregate amount of revolving commitments, and (ii) 0.25% when that amount is less than 50% of the aggregate amount of revolving commitments. Accrued and unpaid unused fees will be payable quarterly in arrears during the term of the First Lien Credit Agreement and on the Revolving Termination Date (or any earlier date of termination of the revolving commitments or reduction of the revolving commitments to zero).
Letters of credit and the proceeds of revolving loans may be used (i) to refinance indebtedness under the Bridge Credit Agreement (which agreement was canceled and refinanced upon our entry into the Credit Agreements), (ii) for working capital and general corporate purposes (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the First Lien Credit Agreement, including limitations on investments in non-Borrowing Base Properties), and (iii) to fund professional fee payments and other fees and expenses subject to the provisions of the Plan and related confirmation order and for other uses permitted by the provisions of the First Lien Credit Agreement, Plan and confirmation order, in each case consistent with an approved annual business plan. We may terminate or reduce the amount of the revolving commitments at any time and from time to time without penalty or premium, subject to the terms of the First Lien Credit Agreement.
The First Lien Credit Agreement contains, among other restrictions, certain additional affirmative and negative covenants and other terms, many of which substantially align with those in the Second Lien Credit Agreement and are summarized below under “Similar Terms of the Credit Agreements.”
Second Lien Credit Agreement
Amounts borrowed under the Second Lien Credit Agreement may be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bear interest at the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate will not be less than 1.50% per annum, in each case plus 7.00% per annum. LIBOR Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 8.00% per annum, provided that LIBOR will not be less than 0.50% per annum. Interest is due to be paid in kind on the last day of each applicable interest period (with rolling 30-day interest periods) by adding the accrued and unpaid amount thereof to the principal balance of the loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement and then accruing interest on the increased principal amount (provided that after the discharge of our Senior Debt Obligations, interest will be paid in cash). We are required to pay certain fees to the administrative agent for the account of the lenders in connection with the Second Lien Credit Agreement.
The proceeds of loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement may only be used to refinance existing indebtedness under the 2018 Credit Agreement and the 7-Year Term Loan.
The Second Lien Credit Agreement contains, among other restrictions, certain additional affirmative and negative covenants and other terms, many of which substantially align with those in the First Lien Credit Agreement and are summarized below under “Similar Terms of the Credit Agreements.”
On February 8, 2021, the Company entered into the first amendment to the Second Lien Credit Agreement (“First Amendment”). The First Amendment provided for elimination of approximately $5.3 million of the disputed default interest that was capitalized into the principal balance of the Second Lien Term Loan Facility on the effective date thereof, reducing the outstanding principal amount of loans outstanding under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, retroactively, as of December 10, 2020, to $535.2 million. The First Amendment also eliminated the disputed PIK interest that was capitalized through the date of the amendment.
Similar Terms of the Credit Agreements
15
Each of the Credit Agreements contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and other provisions, as described in detail below, which substantially align with those contained in the other Credit Agreements.
Covenants
Each of the Credit Agreements contains, among other restrictions, certain affirmative and negative covenants, including, without limitation, requirements that we:
Each of the Credit Agreements also limits our ability, subject to certain exceptions, to make certain restricted payments (including payments of dividends and voluntary prepayments of certain indebtedness which includes, with respect to the First Lien Credit Agreement, voluntary prepayments under the Second Lien Credit Agreement), make certain types of investments and acquisitions, issue redeemable securities, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens on our assets, enter into agreements with a negative pledge, make certain intercompany transfers, merge, consolidate or sell all or substantially all of our assets or the equity interests in our subsidiaries, amend our organizational documents or material contracts, enter into transactions with affiliates, or enter into derivatives contracts. We are also prohibited from selling certain properties unless certain conditions are satisfied with respect to the terms of the sale agreement for such property or, in the case of Borrowing Base Properties, payment of certain release prices.
The First Lien Credit Agreement and, after our Senior Debt Obligations are discharged, the Second Lien Credit Agreement, each prohibit us from (i) entering into Major Leases, (ii) assigning leases, (iii) discounting any rent under leases where the leased premises is at least 7,500 square feet at a Borrowing Base Property and the discounted amount is more than $750,000 and more than 25% of the aggregate contractual base rent payable over the initial term (not including any extension options), (iv) collecting rent in advance, (v) terminating or modifying the terms of any Major Lease or releasing or discharging tenants from any obligations thereunder, (vi) consenting to a tenant’s assignment or subletting of a Major Lease, or (vii) subordinating any lease to any other deed of trust, mortgage, deed to secure debt or encumbrance, other than the mortgages already encumbering the applicable Borrowing Base Property and the mortgages entered into in connection with the other Credit Agreement. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, and under the Second Lien Credit Agreement after the First Lien Termination Date, any amounts equal to or greater than $2.5 million but less than $3.5 million received by or on behalf of a guarantor in consideration of any termination or modification of a lease (or the release or discharge of a tenant) are subject to restrictions on use, and such amounts that are equal to or greater than $3.5 million must be applied to reduce our outstanding obligations under the applicable Credit Agreement.
As of March 31, 2022, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreements.
Restructured Credit Agreements
Prior to completion of the Financial Restructuring, we had entered into three credit agreements: (1) the 2018 Credit Agreement, which included (a) the $375.0 million 2018 Revolving Facility (“Restructured Revolver”), and (b) the $300.0 million 2018 Term Loan Facility, (2) the $250.0 million 2014 7-Year Term Loan, and (3) the Bridge Credit Agreement. Throughout 2020, we entered into various amendments to the Restructured Credit Agreements. On August 11, 2020, we entered into the Bridge Credit Agreement which provided for up to $30.0 million of additional borrowings and an original maturity date of September 30, 2020. On September 30, 2020, we amended our Restructured Credit Agreements to, among other things, extend the maturity date of the Bridge Credit Agreement until October 31, 2020 and to provide for the ability to request additional commitments of up to $25.0 million under our Bridge Credit Agreement. The September 2020 amendments also eliminated the minimum liquidity requirement under each of the Restructured Credit Agreements. We also amended the Bridge Credit Agreement on October 16, 2020 to, among other things, increase the aggregate amount of commitments under the Bridge Credit Agreement by
16
$25.0 million. As of November 1, 2020, we had borrowed $590.0 million available under the Restructured Credit Agreements, including $55.0 million under our Bridge Credit Agreement and the full $375.0 million under the 2018 Revolving Facility. The Restructured Credit Agreements contained certain affirmative and negative covenants, several of which were amended on March 30, 2020. Pursuant to amendments dated July 27, 2020, some of those covenants were suspended for the duration of the suspension period, as extended by the September 30, 2020 amendments. As such, the Restructured Credit Agreements, as amended, restricted our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common shares and preferred shares for the duration of the Suspension Period. The filing of the chapter 11 cases constituted an event of default under the Restructured Credit Agreements. Upon our entry into the Credit Agreements, the Bridge Credit Agreement, the 7-Year Term Loan and the 2018 Credit Agreement were cancelled.
Consolidated Mortgage Loans
The estimated fair values of our consolidated mortgage loans based on year-end interest rates and market conditions at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 were as follows:
|
|
March 31, 2022 |
|
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
||||||||||
(in millions of dollars) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
Mortgage loans(1) |
|
$ |
846.5 |
|
|
$ |
832.7 |
|
|
$ |
852.5 |
|
|
$ |
846.6 |
|
|
|
(1) The carrying value of mortgage loans includes unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.5 million and $1.2 million as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
The consolidated mortgage loans contain various customary default provisions. As of March 31, 2022, we were not in default on any of the consolidated mortgage loans, except for our mortgage secured by Valley View Mall.
Mortgage Loan Activity
Woodland Amendment
On December 10, 2021, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries entered into an amendment to our mortgage loan secured by the property at Woodland Mall in Grand Rapids, Michigan, which provides for an extension of the maturity date until December 10, 2022. The Company capitalized $0.3 million of lender fees as additional debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment.
Forbearance Agreements
During 2020, we executed forbearance and loan modification agreements for Cherry Hill Mall, Cumberland Mall, Dartmouth Mall, Francis Scott Key Mall, Viewmont Mall, and Woodland Mall. These arrangements allowed us to defer principal payments, and in some cases interest as well, between May and August 2020 depending on the terms of each agreement. At the end of the deferral period, repayment of deferred amounts spanned from four to six months. The repayment periods ranged from August 2020 through February 2021 pursuant to the terms of the specific agreements. Certain of these forbearance and loan modification agreements also imposed certain additional informational reporting requirements during the applicable modification periods. As of March 31, 2022, we had repaid all principal and interest deferrals.
5. CASH FLOW INFORMATION
We consider all highly liquid short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less at purchase or acquisition to be cash equivalents.
At March 31, 2022 and 2021, cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $61.1 million and $53.9 million, respectively, and
included tenant security deposits of $1.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
Cash paid for interest was $16.5 million and $16.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, net of amounts capitalized of $24 thousand and $0.1 million, respectively.
In our statement of cash flows, we report cash flows on our revolving facilities on a net basis. Aggregate repayments on our First Lien Revolving Facility and Term Loan were $0.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2022. We had no borrowings or repayments on our First Lien Revolving Facility for the three months ended March 31, 2021.
Accrued construction costs decreased by $3.8 million and increased by $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing non-cash changes in investment in real estate and construction in progress.
The following table provides a summary of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the statement of cash flows as of March 31, 2022 and 2021.
|
|
March 31, |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
45,554 |
|
|
$ |
44,637 |
|
Restricted cash included in other assets |
|
|
15,547 |
|
|
|
9,279 |
|
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows |
|
$ |
61,101 |
|
|
$ |
53,916 |
|
Our restricted cash consists of cash held in escrow by banks for real estate taxes and other purposes.
17
6. DERIVATIVES
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to financial market risks, including interest rate risk on our interest bearing liabilities. We attempt to limit these risks by following established risk management policies, procedures and strategies, including the use of financial instruments such as derivatives. We do not use financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
For derivatives that have been designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income” and subsequently reclassified into “Interest expense, net” in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Through December 10, 2020, all of our derivatives were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.
On December 10, 2020 as a result of the Financial Restructuring, we de-designated seven of our interest rate swaps which were previously designated cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan, as the occurrence of the hedged forecasted transactions was no longer probable during the hedged time period due to the Financial Restructuring as described in Note 1. As such, the Company accelerated the reclassification of a portion of the amounts in other comprehensive (loss) income to earnings which resulted in a loss of $2.8 million that was recorded within interest expense, net in the consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, on December 10, 2020, the Company voluntarily de-designated the remaining thirteen interest swaps that were also previously designated as cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan. Upon de-designation, the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income balance of each of these de-designated derivatives will be separately reclassified to earnings as the originally hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. Through December 10, 2020, the changes in fair value of the derivatives were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated balance sheets.
On December 22, 2020, we re-designated nine interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $375.0 million as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk against the First Lien Term Loan Facility. These interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting treatment with changes in the fair value of the derivatives recorded through accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.
As of March 31, 2022, we had seven total derivatives which were designated as cash flow hedges.
We recognize all derivatives at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Our derivative assets are recorded in “Deferred costs and other assets” and our derivative liabilities are recorded in “Fair value of derivative instruments.”
Over the next twelve months we estimate that $2.7 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense. The recognition of these amounts could be accelerated in the event that we repay amounts outstanding on the debt instruments and do not replace them with new borrowings.
Non-designated Hedges
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative; they are also used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. For swaps that were not re-designated subsequent to December 10, 2020, changes in the fair value of derivatives were recorded directly in earnings as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2021, we had four non-designated swaps mature. As of March 31, 2022, we had no derivatives which were not designated in hedging relationships.
Interest Rate Swaps
As of March 31, 2022, we had interest rate swap agreements designated in qualifying hedging relationships outstanding with a weighted average base interest rate of 2.70% on a notional amount of $300.0 million, maturing in May 2023. We originally entered into these interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge the interest payments associated with our issuances of variable interest rate long term debt. The interest rate swap agreements are net settled monthly.
The following table summarizes the terms and estimated fair values of our interest rate swap derivative instruments as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 based on the year they mature. The notional values provide an indication of the extent of our involvement in these instruments, but do not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks.
Maturity Date |
|
Aggregate Notional Value at |
|
|
Aggregate Fair Value at |
|
|
Aggregate Fair Value at |
|
|
Weighted |
|
||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2023 |
|
$ |
300.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
2.70 |
% |
18
The tables below present the effect of derivative financial instruments on accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and on our consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
||||||||||
(in millions of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate products |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||
(in millions of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Total interest expense presented in the consolidated statements of operations in which the effects of cash flow hedges are recorded |
|
$ |
(31.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.7 |
) |
Amount of (loss) gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features
We have agreements with some of our derivative counterparties that contain a provision pursuant to which, if our entity that originated such derivative instruments defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then we could also be declared to be in default on our derivative obligations. As of March 31, 2022, we were not in default on any of our derivative obligations.
We have an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the loan covenant provisions of our loan agreement with a lender affiliated with the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions would result in our being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.
As of March 31, 2022, the fair value of derivatives in a liability position, which excludes accrued interest but includes any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements, was $2.6 million. If we had breached any of the default provisions in these agreements as of March 31, 2022, we might have been required to settle our obligations under the agreements at their termination value (including accrued interest) of $3.3 million. We had not breached any of these provisions as of March 31, 2022.
7. LEASES
As Lessee
We have entered into ground leases for portions of the land at Springfield Town Center and Plymouth Meeting Mall. We have also entered into an office lease for our headquarters location, as well as vehicle, solar panel and equipment leases as a lessee. The initial terms of these agreements generally range from to 40 years, with certain agreements containing extension options for up to an additional 60 years. Upon lease execution, the Company measures a liability for the present value of future lease payments over the noncancelable period of the lease and any renewal option period we are reasonably certain of exercising. Certain agreements require that we pay a portion of reimbursable expenses such as CAM, utilities, insurance and real estate taxes. These payments are not included in the calculation of the lease liability and are presented as variable lease costs.
Our leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit interest rate; therefore, we estimate our incremental borrowing rate to calculate the present value of remaining lease payments. In determining our incremental borrowing rate, we considered the lease term, market interest rates and estimates regarding our implied credit rating using market data with adjustments to determine an appropriate incremental borrowing rate.
19
The following table presents additional information pertaining to the Company’s leases:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
Solar Panel |
|
|
Ground Leases |
|
|
Office, |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Solar Panel |
|
|
Ground Leases |
|
|
Office, |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
Finance lease cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Amortization of right-of-use assets |
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
||||
Interest on lease liabilities |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
||||
Operating lease costs |
|
|
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
||
Variable lease costs |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
||
Total lease costs |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
1,185 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
Other information related to leases as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 are as follows:
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Cash paid for the amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating cash flows used for finance leases |
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
Operating cash flows used for operating leases |
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
552 |
|
Financing cash flows used for finance leases |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
Weighted average remaining lease term-finance leases (months) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Weighted average remaining lease term-operating leases (months) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Weighted average discount rate-finance leases |
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
Weighted average discount rate-operating leases |
|
|
6.44 |
% |
|
|
6.44 |
% |
Future payments against lease liabilities, which are recorded in Accrued expenses and other liabilities, as of March 31, 2022 are as follows:
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|||||
April 1 to December 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
1,951 |
|
|
$ |
2,691 |
|
2023 |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
3,539 |
|
2024 |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
2,471 |
|
|
|
3,420 |
|
2025 |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
3,356 |
|
2026 |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
48,658 |
|
|
|
49,806 |
|
Total undiscounted lease payments |
|
|
5,674 |
|
|
|
60,492 |
|
|
|
66,166 |
|
Less imputed interest |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(31,147 |
) |
|
|
(31,833 |
) |
Total lease liabilities |
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
$ |
29,345 |
|
|
$ |
34,333 |
|
As Lessor
As of March 31, 2022, the fixed contractual lease payments, including minimum rents and fixed CAM amounts, to be received over the next five years pursuant to the terms of noncancelable operating leases with initial terms greater than one year are included in the table below. The amounts presented assume that no leases are renewed and no renewal options are exercised. Additionally, the table does not include variable lease payments that may be received under certain leases for percentage rents or the reimbursement of operating costs, such as common area expenses, utilities, insurance and real estate taxes. These variable lease payments are recognized in the period when the applicable expenditures are incurred or, in the case of percentage rents, when the sales data is made available.
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
April 1 to December 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
138,433 |
|
2023 |
|
|
167,308 |
|
2024 |
|
|
144,553 |
|
2025 |
|
|
115,992 |
|
2026 |
|
|
96,854 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
248,425 |
|
|
|
$ |
911,565 |
|
20
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2022, we had unaccrued contractual and other commitments related to our capital improvement projects and development projects of $4.1 million, including $0.6 million of commitments related to the redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia, in the form of tenant allowances and contracts with general service providers and other professional service providers. For purposes of this disclosure, the contractual obligations and other commitments related to Fashion District Philadelphia are included at 100% of the obligation and not at our 50% ownership share.
Preferred Dividend Arrearages
We have aggregate authorized preferred shares of 25.0 million, where each series of authorized preferred shares is equal to the number of preferred shares outstanding of that series. Dividends on the Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shares are cumulative and therefore will continue to accrue at an annual rate of $1.8436 per share, $1.80 per share and $1.7188 per share, respectively. As of March 31, 2022, the cumulative amount of unpaid dividends on our issued and outstanding preferred shares totaled $47.9 million. This consisted of unpaid dividends per share on the Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shares of $3.23 per share, $3.15 per share and $3.01 per share, respectively.
NYSE Continued Listing Standards
On September 25, 2020, the Company received notice from the NYSE that the Company was not in compliance with the NYSE continued
listing standard set forth in Section 802.01C of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual (the “Continued Listing Standards”), which requires listed
companies to maintain an average closing price of at least $1.00 per share over a consecutive 30-day trading period.
On January 4, 2021, the Company received notice from the NYSE that it regained compliance with the Continued Listing Standards. The
Company regained compliance after the closing price for its common shares on December 31, 2020 and the average closing price for its
common shares during the 30 trading-day period ended December 31, 2020 both exceeded $1.00.
On February 4, 2022, the Company received another notice from the NYSE that the Company was not in compliance with the NYSE continued
listing standard set forth in Section 802.01C of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual (the “Continued Listing Standards”), which requires listed
companies to maintain an average closing price of at least $1.00 per share over a consecutive 30-day trading period.
21
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The disclosures in this report are complementary to those made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
OVERVIEW
PREIT, a Pennsylvania business trust founded in 1960 and one of the first equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) in the United States, has a primary investment focus on shopping malls located in the eastern half of the United States, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region.
We currently own interests in 25 retail properties, of which 24 are operating properties and one is a development property. The 24 operating properties include 20 shopping malls and four other retail properties, have a total of 19.6 million square feet and are located in eight states. We and partnerships in which we hold an interest own 15.1 million square feet at these properties (excluding space owned by anchors or third parties).
There are 17 operating retail properties in our portfolio that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes. These consolidated properties have a total of 14.6 million square feet, of which we own 11.4 million square feet. The seven operating retail properties that are owned by unconsolidated partnerships with third parties have a total of 5.0 million square feet of which 3.6 million square feet are owned by such partnerships. When we refer to “Same Store” properties, we are referring to properties that have been owned for the full periods presented and exclude properties acquired or disposed of, under redevelopment or designated as a non-core property during the periods presented. Core properties include all operating retail properties except for Exton Square Mall. Valley View Mall was previously designated as a non-core property. As discussed further in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, a foreclosure sale judgment with respect to Valley View Mall was ordered by the court after the property operations were assumed by a receiver on behalf of the lender under the mortgage loan secured by Valley View Mall and we no longer operate the property. “Core Malls” also excludes these properties as well as power centers and Gloucester Premium Outlets.
We have one property in our portfolio that is classified as under development; however, we do not currently have any activity occurring at this property.
Our primary business is owning, operating and redeveloping shopping malls, which we do primarily through our operating partnership, PREIT Associates, L.P. (“PREIT Associates” or the “Operating Partnership”). We believe our distinctive real estate is at the forefront of enabling communities to flourish through the built environment by providing opportunities to create vibrant multi-use destinations. In general, our malls include carefully curated retail and lifestyle offerings, including national and regional department stores, large format retailers and other anchors, mixed with destination dining and entertainment experiences. In recent years, we have increased the portion of our mall properties that are leased to non-traditional mall tenants, including life sciences, healthcare, supermarkets and self-storage facilities.
We provide management, leasing and real estate development services through PREIT Services, LLC (“PREIT Services”), which generally develops and manages properties that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes, and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. (“PRI”), which generally develops and manages properties that we do not consolidate for financial reporting purposes, including properties owned by partnerships in which we own an interest, and properties that are owned by third parties in which we do not have an interest. PRI is a taxable REIT subsidiary, as defined by federal tax laws, which means that it is able to offer additional services to tenants without jeopardizing our continuing qualification as a REIT under federal tax law.
Our revenue consists primarily of fixed rental income, additional rent in the form of expense reimbursements, and percentage rent (rent that is based on a percentage of our tenants’ sales or a percentage of sales in excess of thresholds that are specified in the leases) derived from our income producing properties. We also receive income from our real estate partnership investments and from the management and leasing services PRI provides.
The COVID-19 global pandemic that began in early 2020 has adversely impacted and continues to impact our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results, as well as our tenants’ businesses. The prolonged and increased spread of COVID-19 has also led to unprecedented global economic disruption and volatility in financial markets. Some of our tenants’ financial health and business viability have been adversely impacted and their creditworthiness has deteriorated. We anticipate that our future business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, including in 2021 and potentially in future periods, will continue to be materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although we have operated in the COVID-19 environment for approximately two years, uncertainty remains as to how long the global pandemic, economic challenges and restrictions on day-to-day life and business operations will continue to impact us or our tenants.
COVID-19 closures of our properties began on March 12, 2020 and continued through the reopening of our last property on July 3, 2020; all of our properties have remained open since that time and are employing safety and sanitation measures designed to address the risks posed by COVID-19, with some of our tenants still operating at reduced capacity. Following the pandemic-related closures, approximately 4% of our tenants failed to re-open (inclusive of tenants that filed for bankruptcy protection in the aftermath). As a result of the challenging environment
22
created by COVID-19, primarily beginning in the second quarter of 2020, many of our tenants have sought rent relief and deferral and several have failed to pay rent due. Although we continue to make progress in collecting COVID-19-period rents, we have also initiated legal proceedings against certain tenants for failure to pay. Collections improved in 2022 and 2021 as compared to 2020. We believe that our rent collections are probable, but expect that collections will continue to be below our tenants’ rent obligations as long as the effects of COVID-19 affect the financial strength of our tenants. The significance of the prolonged pandemic on our business, however, will continue to depend on, among other things, the resurgences of outbreaks, the severity of the disease and the number of people infected with the virus, the timing and widespread availability and acceptance of vaccines, the further effects on the economy of the pandemic and of the measures taken by governmental authorities and other third parties restricting daily activities and the length of time that such measures remain in place or are renewed, and implementation of governmental programs to assist businesses and consumers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2022 was $33.0 million compared to net loss of $44.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. This $11.0 million decrease in net loss was primarily due to: (a) an increase in real estate revenue of $3.9 million resulting from the recovering economic conditions following the impact of COVID-19 on our tenants; (b) an increase in gain on the sale of preferred equity interests of $3.7 million; (c) a decrease in depreciation and amortization of $0.7 million; and (d) a decrease in equity in loss of partnerships of $3.0 million.
We evaluate operating results and allocate resources on a property-by-property basis, and do not distinguish or evaluate our consolidated operations on a geographic basis. Due to the nature of our operating properties, which involve retail shopping, dining and entertainment, we have concluded that our individual properties have similar economic characteristics and meet all other aggregation criteria. Accordingly, we have aggregated our individual properties into one reportable segment. In addition, no single tenant accounts for 10% or more of our consolidated revenue, and none of our properties are located outside the United States.
Current Economic and Industry Conditions and Impact of COVID-19
Conditions in the economy have caused fluctuations and variations in business and consumer confidence, retail sales, and consumer spending on retail goods, destination dining and entertainment. Further, traditional mall tenants, including department store anchors and smaller format retail tenants face significant challenges resulting from changing consumer expectations, the convenience of e-commerce shopping, competition from fast fashion retailers, the expansion of outlet centers, and declining mall traffic, among other factors. In recent years, there has been an increased level of tenant bankruptcies and store closings by tenants who have been significantly impacted by these factors. All of these factors have been exacerbated by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, throughout 2021, and continuing into the first quarter of 2022.
The table below sets forth information related to our tenants in bankruptcy for our consolidated and unconsolidated properties (excluding tenants in bankruptcy at sold properties):
|
|
Pre-bankruptcy |
|
|
Units Closed |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Year |
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
GLA(2) |
|
|
PREIT’s |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
GLA(2) |
|
|
PREIT’s |
|
|||||||
2022 (through March 31, 2022) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Consolidated properties |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Unconsolidated properties |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
2021 (Full Year) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Consolidated properties |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
331,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,589 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18,344 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
Unconsolidated properties |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Total |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
335,360 |
|
|
$ |
1,646 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
22,390 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
(1) Total represents unique tenants and includes both tenant-owned and landlord-owned stores. As a result, amounts may not total.
(2) Gross Leasable Area (“GLA”) in square feet.
(3) Includes our share of tenant gross rent from partnership properties based on PREIT’s ownership percentage in the respective equity method investments as of March 31, 2022.
Anchor Replacements
In recent years, through property dispositions, proactive store recaptures, lease terminations and other activities, we have made efforts to reduce our risks associated with certain department store concentrations.
During 2019, we re-opened or introduced additional tenants to former anchor positions at Woodland Mall in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Valley Mall in Hagerstown, Maryland and Plymouth Meeting Mall, in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. Dick’s Sporting Goods at Valley Mall opened in the first quarter of 2020. At Plymouth Meeting Mall, we opened Michaels in the first quarter of 2020. In 2017, we purchased the
23
Macy’s location at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey and opened HomeSense, Sierra Trading, Five Below and Michaels between 2018 and the first quarter of 2020. During 2021, we opened Power Warehouse and during the first quarter of 2022, we opened HomeGoods at Cumberland Mall in Vineland, New Jersey.
Construction was completed in the first quarter of 2020 giving way to the opening of Burlington in place of a former Sears at Dartmouth Mall in Dartmouth, Massachusetts. Aldi also opened in the space adjacent to Burlington in September 2021. We expect to continue to move forward with several outparcels at Dartmouth Mall resulting from the Sears recapture and to work with large format prospects for the additional space adjacent to Burlington, but have experienced delays due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
During 2019, an anchor tenant, Sears, closed at Exton Square Mall in Exton, Pennsylvania. In January 2020, the Lord & Taylor store at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey closed and we executed a lease with Turn 7, which opened in the fourth quarter of 2021. Sears closed its stores at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey and Jacksonville Mall in Jacksonville, North Carolina in April 2020. Sears continues to be financially obligated pursuant to the lease at the Jacksonville Mall location. In July 2021, the former Sears site at Moorestown Mall was sold to Cooper University Health Care. In May 2020, J.C. Penney filed for bankruptcy and announced the closure of its stores at the Mall at Prince Georges in Hyattsville, Maryland, and Magnolia Mall in Florence, South Carolina. The Magnolia Mall location has been leased to Tilt Studio, an entertainment concept that opened in October 2021.
In response to anchor store closings and other trends in the retail space, we have been changing the mix of tenants at our properties. In general, our malls include national and regional department stores, large format retailers and other anchors, mixed with destination dining and entertainment experiences, however, in recent years, we have been reducing the percentage of traditional mall tenants and increasing the share of space dedicated to non-traditional mall tenants. Approximately 29.0% of our mall space is committed to non-traditional tenants offering services such as dining and entertainment, health and wellness, off-price retail and fast fashion. See “— Capital Improvements, Redevelopment and Development Projects.”
To fund the capital necessary to replace anchors and to maintain a reasonable level of leverage, we expect to use a variety of means available to us, subject to and in accordance with the terms of our Credit Agreements. These steps might include (i) making additional borrowings under our Credit Agreements (assuming availability and continued compliance with the financial covenants thereunder), (ii) obtaining construction loans on specific projects, (iii) selling properties or interests in properties with values in excess of their mortgage loans (if applicable) and applying the excess proceeds to fund capital expenditures or for debt reduction, or (iv) obtaining capital from joint ventures or other partnerships or arrangements involving our contribution of assets with institutional investors, private equity investors or other REITs.
Capital Improvements, Redevelopment and Development Projects
We might engage in various types of capital improvement projects at our operating properties. Such projects vary in cost and complexity, and can include building out new or existing space for individual tenants, upgrading common areas or exterior areas such as parking lots, or redeveloping the entire property, among other projects. Project costs are accumulated in “Construction in progress” on our consolidated balance sheet until the asset is placed into service, and amounted to $45.1 million as of March 31, 2022.
As of March 31, 2022, we had unaccrued contractual and other commitments related to our capital improvement projects and development projects at our consolidated and unconsolidated properties of $4.1 million, including $0.6 million of commitments related to the redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia, in the form of contracts with general service providers and other professional service providers.
In 2014, we entered into a 50/50 joint venture with The Macerich Company (“Macerich”) to redevelop Fashion District Philadelphia. As we redevelop Fashion District Philadelphia, operating results in the short term, as measured by sales, occupancy, real estate revenue, property operating expenses, Net Operating Income (“NOI”) and depreciation, will continue to be affected until the newly constructed space is completed, leased and occupied.
In January 2018, the Company and Macerich entered into a $250.0 million term loan (as amended in July 2019 to increase the total maximum potential borrowings to $350.0 million) to fund the ongoing redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia and to repay capital contributions to the venture previously made by the partners. A total of $51.0 million was drawn during the third quarter of 2019 and we received aggregate distributions of $25.0 million as our share of the draws. On December 10, 2020, PM Gallery LP, together with certain other subsidiaries owned indirectly by us and Macerich (including the fee and leasehold owners of the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project), entered into an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (the “FDP Loan Agreement”). In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, a $100.0 million principal payment was made (and funded indirectly by Macerich, the “Partnership Loan”) to pay down the existing loan, reducing the outstanding principal under the FDP Loan Agreement from $301.0 million to $201.0 million. The joint venture must repay the Partnership Loan plus 15% accrued interest to Macerich, in its capacity as the lender, prior to the resumption of 50/50 cash distributions to us and Macerich. In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, the governing structure of PM Gallery LP was modified such that, effective as of January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the entity’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions. The Company considered the changes to the governing structure of PM Gallery LP and determined the investment qualifies as a variable interest entity and would continue to be accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
24
The FDP Loan Agreement provides for (i) a maturity date of January 22, 2023, with the potential for a one-year extension upon the borrowers’ satisfaction of certain conditions, (ii) an interest rate at the borrowers’ option with respect to each advance of either (A) the Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.00%) plus 2.50% or (B) LIBOR for the applicable period plus 3.50%, (iii) a full recourse guarantee of 50% of the borrowers’ obligations by PREIT Associates, L.P., on a several basis, (iv) a full recourse guarantee of certain of the borrowers’ obligations by The Macerich Partnership, L.P., up to a maximum of $50.0 million, on a several basis, (v) a pledge of the equity interests of certain indirect subsidiaries of PREIT and Macerich, as well as of PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. and one of its subsidiaries, that have a direct or indirect ownership interest in the borrowers, (vi) a non-recourse carve-out guaranty and a hazardous materials indemnity by each of PREIT Associates, L.P. and The Macerich Partnership, L.P., and (vii) mortgages of the borrowers’ fee and leasehold interests in the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project and certain other properties. The FDP Loan Agreement contains certain covenants typical for loans of its type.
We also own one development property, but we do not expect to make any significant investment at this property in the short term.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Critical Accounting Policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that might change in subsequent periods. In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements, management has utilized available information, including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Management has also considered events and changes in property, market and economic conditions, estimated future cash flows from property operations and the risk of loss on specific accounts or amounts in determining its estimates and judgments. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may affect comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in a similar business. The estimates and assumptions made by management in applying critical accounting policies have not changed materially during 2022 and 2021, except as otherwise noted, and none of these estimates or assumptions have proven to be materially incorrect or resulted in our recording any significant adjustments relating to prior periods. We will continue to monitor the key factors underlying our estimates and judgments, but no change is currently expected.
For additional information regarding our Critical Accounting Policies, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Asset Impairment
Real estate investments and related intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property might not be recoverable, which is referred to as a "triggering event.". A property to be held and used is considered impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows, less estimated capital expenditures, to be generated by the property, undiscounted and without interest charges, are less than the carrying value of the property. This estimate takes into consideration factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors.
If there is a triggering event in relation to a property to be held and used, we will estimate the aggregate future cash flows, less estimated capital expenditures, to be generated by the property, undiscounted and without interest charges. In addition, this estimate may consider a probability weighted cash flow estimation approach when alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration or when a range of possible values is estimated.
The determination of undiscounted cash flows requires significant estimates by management, including the expected course of action at the balance sheet date that would lead to such cash flows. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in the anticipated action to be taken with respect to the property could impact the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could materially affect our net income. To the extent estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the estimated fair value of the property. Our intent is to hold and operate our properties long-term, which reduces the likelihood that our carrying value is not recoverable. A shortened holding period would increase the likelihood that the carrying value is not recoverable.
Assessment of our ability to recover certain lease related costs must be made when we have a reason to believe that the tenant might not be able to perform under the terms of the lease as originally expected. This requires us to make estimates as to the recoverability of such costs.
An other-than-temporary impairment of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture is recognized when the carrying value of the investment is not considered recoverable based on evaluation of the severity and duration of the decline in value. To the extent impairment has occurred, the excess carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value is recorded as reduction to income.
25
Revenue and Receivables
We derive over 95% of our revenue from tenant rent and other tenant-related activities. Tenant rent includes base rent, percentage rent, expense reimbursements (such as reimbursements of costs of common area maintenance (“CAM”), real estate taxes and utilities), and the amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles.
We accrue revenue under leases, provided that it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the lease revenue that is due under the terms of the lease both at inception and on an ongoing basis. When collectability of lease revenue is not probable, leases are prospectively accounted for on a cash basis and any difference between the revenue that has been accrued and the cash collected from the tenant over the life of the lease is recognized as a current period adjustment to lease revenue. We review the collectability of our tenant receivables related to tenant rent including base rent, straight-line rent, expense reimbursements and other revenue or income by specifically analyzing billed and unbilled revenues, including straight-line rent receivable, and considering historical collection issues, tenant creditworthiness and current economic and industry trends. Our revenue recognition and receivables collectability analysis places particular emphasis on past-due accounts and considers the nature and age of the receivables, the payment history and financial condition of the payor, the basis for any disputes or negotiations with the payor, and other information that could affect collectability.
We record base rent on a straight-line basis, which means that the monthly base rent revenue according to the terms of our leases with our tenants is adjusted so that an average monthly rent is recorded for each tenant over the term of its lease. When tenants vacate prior to the end of their lease, we accelerate amortization of any related unamortized straight-line rent balances, and unamortized above-market and below-market intangible balances are amortized as a decrease or increase to real estate revenue, respectively.
Percentage rent represents rental revenue that the tenant pays based on a percentage of its sales, either as a percentage of its total sales or as a percentage of sales over a certain threshold. In the latter case, we do not record percentage rent until the sales threshold has been reached.
Revenue for rent received from tenants prior to their due dates is deferred until the period to which the rent applies.
In addition to base rent, certain lease agreements contain provisions that require tenants to reimburse a fixed or pro rata share of certain CAM costs, real estate taxes and utilities. Tenants generally make monthly expense reimbursement payments based on a budgeted amount determined at the beginning of the year. Effective January 1, 2019, we recognize fixed CAM revenue prospectively on a straight-line basis.
Certain lease agreements contain co-tenancy clauses that can change the amount of rent or the type of rent that tenants are required to pay, or, in some cases, can allow the tenant to terminate their lease, in the event that certain events take place, such as a decline in property occupancy levels below certain defined levels or the vacating of an anchor store. Co-tenancy clauses do not generally have any retroactive effect when they are triggered. The effect of co-tenancy clauses is applied on a prospective basis to recognize the new rent that is in effect.
Payments made to tenants as inducements to enter into a lease are treated as deferred costs that are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the term of the related lease.
Lease termination fee revenue is recognized in the period when a termination agreement is signed, collectability is assured, and the tenant has vacated the space. In the event that a tenant is in bankruptcy when the termination agreement is signed, termination fee income is deferred and recognized when it is received.
We also generate revenue by providing management services to third parties, including property management, brokerage, leasing and development. Management fees generally are a percentage of managed property revenue or cash receipts. Leasing fees are earned upon the consummation of new leases. Development fees are earned over the time period of the development activity and are recognized on the percentage of completion method. These activities are collectively included in “Other income” in the consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue from the reimbursement of marketing expenses is generated through tenant leases that require tenants to reimburse a defined amount of property marketing expenses. Our contractual performance obligations are fulfilled as marketing expenditures are made. Tenant payments are received monthly as required by the respective lease terms. We defer income recognition if the reimbursements exceed the aggregate marketing expenditures made through that date. Deferred marketing reimbursement revenue is recorded in tenants’ deposits and deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheet. The marketing reimbursements are recognized as revenue at the time that the marketing expenditures occur.
Property management revenue from management and development activities is generated through contracts with third party owners of real estate properties or with certain of our joint ventures, and is recorded in other income in the consolidated statements of operations. In the case of management fees, our performance obligations are fulfilled over time as the management services are performed and the associated revenues are recognized on a monthly basis when the customer is billed. In the case of development fees, our performance obligations are fulfilled over time as we perform certain stipulated development activities as set forth in the respective development agreements and the associated revenues are recognized on a monthly basis when the customer is billed.
New Accounting Developments
See Note 1 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for descriptions of new accounting developments.
26
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2022 was $33.0 million compared to net loss of $44.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. This $11.0 million decrease in net loss was primarily due to: (a) an increase in real estate revenue of $3.9 million resulting from the recovering economic conditions following the impact of COVID-19 on our tenants; (b) an increase in gain on the sale of preferred equity interests of $3.7 million; (c) a decrease in depreciation and amortization of $0.7 million; and (e) a decrease in equity in loss of partnerships of $3.0 million.
Occupancy
The table below sets forth certain occupancy statistics for our properties as of March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Occupancy(1) at March 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
|
Combined(2) |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||||||
Retail portfolio weighted average (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total excluding anchors |
|
|
88.5 |
% |
|
|
86.0 |
% |
|
|
85.3 |
% |
|
|
80.3 |
% |
|
|
87.6 |
% |
|
|
84.3 |
% |
Total including anchors |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
|
|
87.5 |
% |
|
|
88.0 |
% |
|
|
81.4 |
% |
|
|
90.3 |
% |
|
|
86.0 |
% |
Core Malls weighted average: (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total excluding anchors |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
|
|
87.9 |
% |
|
|
78.8 |
% |
|
|
76.3 |
% |
|
|
88.8 |
% |
|
|
85.9 |
% |
Total including anchors |
|
|
94.3 |
% |
|
|
89.5 |
% |
|
|
84.5 |
% |
|
|
78.1 |
% |
|
|
92.7 |
% |
|
|
87.7 |
% |
(1) Occupancy for all periods presented includes all tenants irrespective of the term of their agreement.
(2) Combined occupancy is calculated by using occupied gross leasable area (“GLA”) for consolidated and unconsolidated properties and dividing by total GLA for consolidated and unconsolidated properties.
(3) Retail portfolio includes all retail properties including Fashion District Philadelphia.
(4) Core Malls excludes Exton Square Mall, power centers and Gloucester Premium Outlets.
Leasing Activity
The table below sets forth summary leasing activity information with respect to our consolidated and unconsolidated properties for the three months ended March 31, 2022:
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
GLA |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Initial Rent |
|
|
Previous |
|
|
Initial Gross Rent |
|
|
Average Rent |
|
|
Annualized |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non Anchor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
New Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Under 10k square feet ("sf") |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
77,644 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
40.97 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
7.03 |
|
||||
Over 10k sf |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
41,450 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
13.51 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
||||
Total New Leases |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
119,094 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
31.41 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
6.48 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Renewal Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Under 10k sf |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
99,981 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
51.78 |
|
|
$ |
53.04 |
|
|
$ |
(1.26 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
%) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
Over 10k sf |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
69,735 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
24.29 |
|
|
|
23.52 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
|
Total Fixed Rent |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
169,716 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
40.49 |
|
|
$ |
40.91 |
|
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
%) |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
Total Percentage in Lieu |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
48,347 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
19.68 |
|
|
|
20.46 |
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
1.72 |
|
Total Renewal Leases |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
218,063 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
35.87 |
|
|
$ |
36.38 |
|
|
$ |
(0.50 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
2.14 |
|
|
Total Non Anchor (4) |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
337,157 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
34.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Anchor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
New Leases |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
||
Renewal Leases |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
(1) Initial gross rent renewal spread is computed by comparing the initial rent per square foot in the new lease to the final rent per square foot amount in the expiring lease. For purposes of this computation, the rent amount includes minimum rent, common area maintenance (“CAM”) charges, estimated real estate tax reimbursements and marketing charges, but excludes percentage rent. In certain cases, a lower rent amount may be payable for a period of time until specified conditions in the lease are satisfied.
(2) Average rent renewal spread is computed by comparing the average rent per square foot over the new lease term to the final rent per square foot amount in the expiring lease. For purposes of this computation, the rent amount includes minimum rent and fixed CAM charges, but excludes pro rata CAM charges, estimated real estate tax reimbursements, marketing charges and percentage rent.
(3) These leasing costs are presented as annualized amounts per square foot and are spread uniformly over the initial lease term.
(4) Includes 3 leases and 12,256 square feet of GLA with respect to our unconsolidated partnerships. We own a 25% to 50% interest in each of our unconsolidated properties and do not control such properties. Our percentage ownership is not necessarily indicative of the legal and economic implications of our ownership interest. See “— Non-GAAP Supplemental Financial Measures” for further details on our ownership interests in our unconsolidated properties.
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
% Change |
||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|||||
Real estate revenue |
|
$ |
69,194 |
|
|
$ |
65,278 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
% |
Property operating expenses |
|
|
(33,573 |
) |
|
|
(33,159 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
% |
Other income |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(29,110 |
) |
|
|
(29,839 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
% |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(11,483 |
) |
|
|
(11,831 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
% |
Provision for employee separation expenses |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
% |
Project costs and other expenses |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(31,391 |
) |
|
|
(30,731 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
% |
Reorganization expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
% |
Equity in loss of partnerships |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
(3,433 |
) |
|
|
(88.5 |
) |
% |
Gain on sale of preferred equity interest |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
% |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(32,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,980 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
% |
The amounts in the preceding tables reflect our consolidated properties and our unconsolidated properties. Our unconsolidated properties are presented under the equity method of accounting in the line item “Equity in (loss) income of partnerships.”
Real Estate Revenue
We include all rental income earned pursuant to tenant leases under the “Lease revenue” line item in the consolidated statements of operations. Utility reimbursements are presented separately in “Expense reimbursements.” We review the collectability of both billed and unbilled lease revenues each reporting period, taking into consideration the tenant’s payment history, credit profile and other factors, including the tenant’s operating performance. For any tenant receivable balance deemed to be uncollectible, we record an offset for credit losses directly to Lease revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.
The following table reports the breakdown of real estate revenues based on the terms of the lease contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Contractual lease payments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Base rent |
|
$ |
47,655 |
|
|
$ |
45,918 |
|
CAM reimbursement income |
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
8,359 |
|
Real estate tax income |
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
|
6,944 |
|
Percentage rent |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Lease termination revenue |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
63,420 |
|
|
|
61,245 |
|
Less: credit losses |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(1,337 |
) |
Lease revenue |
|
|
63,440 |
|
|
|
59,908 |
|
Expense reimbursements |
|
|
4,144 |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
Other real estate revenue |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
Total real estate revenue |
|
$ |
69,194 |
|
|
$ |
65,278 |
|
28
Real Estate Revenue
Real estate revenue increased by $3.9 million, or 6.0%, in the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021, primarily due to:
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses increased by $0.4 million, or 1.2%, in the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021, primarily due to:
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $0.7 million, or 2.4%, in the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021, primarily due to:
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.3 million, or 2.9%, in the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021 primarily due to lower compensation expenses in 2022.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased by $0.7 million, or 2.1%, in the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021. This increase was primarily due to higher weighted average debt balances and higher weighted average interest rates. Our weighted average effective borrowing rate was 5.86% for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to 5.7% for the three months ended March
29
31, 2021. Our weighted average debt balance was $2,258.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to $1,864.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021.
Reorganization Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2022, we have not incurred any reorganization expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, we incurred costs and fees of $0.2 million in connection with our efforts to finalize our Financial Restructuring that were directly attributable to our bankruptcy proceedings, which we classified within reorganization expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.
Equity in loss of partnerships
Equity in loss of partnerships was a loss of $0.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to a loss of $3.4 million in the prior year period, reflecting a change of $3.0 million, or 88.5%. The decrease in loss was primarily due to higher real estate revenues across all of our partnership properties in 2022 due to the economic rebound following the COVID-19 impact, along with lower property operating expenses.
Gain on sale of preferred equity interest
During the three months ended March 31, 2022, there was a $3.7 million gain on sale of preferred equity interest in a property that we received in exchange for the sale of a property we previously owned. There was no gain on sale of preferred equity interest for the three months ended March 31, 2021.
NON-GAAP SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES
Overview
The preceding discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for the periods presented. We also use Net Operating Income (“NOI”) and Funds from Operations (“FFO”) which are non-GAAP financial measures, to supplement our analysis and discussion of our operating performance:
NOI and FFO are commonly used non-GAAP financial measures of operating performance in the real estate industry, and we use them as supplemental non-GAAP measures to compare our performance between different periods and to compare our performance to that of our industry peers. Our computation of NOI, FFO and other non-GAAP financial measures, such as Same Store NOI, Non Same Store NOI, NOI attributable to our share of unconsolidated properties, and FFO, as adjusted, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures used by our industry peers. None of these measures are measures of performance in accordance with GAAP, and they have limitations as analytical tools. They should not be considered as alternative measures of our net loss, operating performance, cash flow or liquidity. They are not indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. Please see below for a discussion of these non-GAAP measures and their respective reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
30
Unconsolidated Properties and Proportionate Financial Information
The non-GAAP financial measures presented below incorporate financial information attributable to our share of unconsolidated properties. This proportionate financial information is non-GAAP financial information, but we believe that it is helpful information because it reflects the pro rata contribution from our unconsolidated properties that are owned through investments accounted for under GAAP using the equity method of accounting. Under such method, earnings from these unconsolidated partnerships are recorded in our statements of operations prepared in accordance with GAAP under the caption entitled “Equity in (loss) income of partnerships.”
To derive the proportionate financial information reflected in the tables below as “unconsolidated,” we multiplied the percentage of our economic interest in each partnership on a property-by-property basis by each line item. Under the partnership agreements relating to our current unconsolidated partnerships with third parties, we own a 25% to 50% economic interest in such partnerships, and there are generally no provisions in such partnership agreements relating to special non-pro rata allocations of income or loss, and there are no preferred or priority returns of capital or other similar provisions. While this method approximates our indirect economic interest in our pro rata share of the revenue and expenses of our unconsolidated partnerships, we do not have a direct legal claim to the assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses of the unconsolidated partnerships beyond our rights as an equity owner in the event of any liquidation of such entity. Our percentage ownership is not necessarily indicative of the legal and economic implications of our ownership interest. Accordingly, NOI and FFO results based on our share of the results of unconsolidated partnerships do not represent cash generated from our investments in these partnerships.
We have determined that we hold a noncontrolling interest in each of our unconsolidated partnerships, and account for such partnerships using the equity method of accounting, because:
We hold legal title to a property owned by one of our unconsolidated partnerships through a tenancy in common arrangement. For this property, such legal title is held by us and another entity, and each has an undivided interest in title to the property. With respect to this property, under the applicable agreements between us and the entity with ownership interests, we and such other entity have joint control because decisions regarding matters such as the sale, refinancing, expansion or rehabilitation of the property require the approval of both us and the other entity owning an interest in the property. Hence, we account for this property like our other unconsolidated partnerships using the equity method of accounting. The balance sheet items arising from this property appear under the caption “Investments in partnerships, at equity.”
For further information regarding our unconsolidated partnerships, see note 3 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Net Operating Income (“NOI”)
NOI (a non-GAAP measure) is derived from real estate revenue (determined in accordance with GAAP, including lease termination revenue), minus property operating expenses (determined in accordance with GAAP), plus our pro rata share of revenue and property operating expenses of our unconsolidated partnership investments. NOI does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered to be an alternative to net loss (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our financial performance or to be an alternative to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity. It is not indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. We believe NOI is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it is an indicator of the return on property investment, and provides a method of comparing property performance over time. We believe that net loss is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI. NOI excludes other income, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, provision for employee separation expenses, project costs and other expenses, interest expense, reorganization expenses, equity in loss/income of partnerships and gain/loss on sale of preferred equity interest.
Same Store NOI is calculated using retail properties owned for the full periods presented and excludes properties acquired or disposed of, under redevelopment, or designated as non-core during the periods presented. Non Same Store NOI is calculated using the retail properties excluded from the calculation of Same Store NOI.
31
The table below reconciles net loss to NOI of our consolidated properties for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(32,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,980 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,110 |
|
|
|
29,839 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
11,483 |
|
|
|
11,831 |
|
Provision for employee separation expenses |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Project costs and other expenses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
31,391 |
|
|
|
30,731 |
|
Reorganization expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Equity in loss (income) of partnerships |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
3,433 |
|
Gain on sale of preferred equity interest |
|
|
(3,688 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
NOI from consolidated properties |
|
$ |
35,621 |
|
|
$ |
32,119 |
|
The table below reconciles equity in (loss) income of partnerships to NOI of our share of unconsolidated properties for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Equity in loss of partnerships |
|
$ |
(395 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,433 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
3,187 |
|
Interest and other expenses |
|
|
5,802 |
|
|
|
5,288 |
|
NOI from equity method investments at ownership share |
|
$ |
8,429 |
|
|
$ |
5,042 |
|
The table below presents total NOI and total NOI excluding lease termination revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Same Store |
|
|
Non Same Store |
|
|
Total (non-GAAP) |
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||||||
NOI from consolidated properties |
|
$ |
36,122 |
|
|
$ |
32,707 |
|
|
$ |
(500 |
) |
|
$ |
(588 |
) |
|
$ |
35,622 |
|
|
$ |
32,119 |
|
NOI from equity method investments at ownership share |
|
|
8,442 |
|
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
8,429 |
|
|
|
5,042 |
|
Total NOI |
|
|
44,564 |
|
|
|
37,767 |
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
44,051 |
|
|
|
37,161 |
|
Less: lease termination revenue |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total NOI excluding lease termination revenue |
|
$ |
43,762 |
|
|
$ |
37,731 |
|
|
$ |
(513 |
) |
|
$ |
(606 |
) |
|
$ |
43,249 |
|
|
$ |
37,125 |
|
Total NOI increased by $6.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021 due to (a) a $6.8 million increase in Same Store NOI and (b) an increase of $0.1 million in Non Same Store NOI. The increase in Same Store and Non Same Store NOI is primarily due the reasons described in “— Real Estate Revenue” and “— Property Operating Expenses.”
Funds From Operations (“FFO”)
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines Funds From Operations (“FFO”), which is a non-GAAP measure commonly used by REITs, as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding (i) depreciation and amortization of real estate, (ii) gains and losses on sales of certain real estate assets, (iii) gains and losses from change in control and (iv) impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition, or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. NAREIT’s established guidance provides that excluding impairment write downs of depreciable real estate is consistent with the NAREIT definition.
FFO is a commonly used measure of operating performance and profitability among REITs. We use FFO and FFO per diluted share and unit of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership (“OP Unit”) in measuring our performance against our peers and have used it as one of the performance measures for determining incentive compensation amounts earned under certain of our performance-based executive compensation programs.
FFO does not include gains and losses on sales of operating real estate assets or impairment write downs of depreciable real estate (including development land parcels), which are included in the determination of net loss in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, FFO is not a comprehensive measure of our operating cash flows. In addition, since FFO does not include depreciation on real estate assets, FFO may not be a useful performance measure when comparing our operating performance to that of other non-real estate commercial enterprises. We
32
compensate for these limitations by using FFO in conjunction with other GAAP financial performance measures, such as net loss and net cash used in operating activities, and other non-GAAP financial performance measures, such as NOI. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered to be an alternative to net loss (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our financial performance or to be an alternative to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. We believe that net loss is the most directly comparable GAAP measurement to FFO.
When applicable, we also present FFO, as adjusted, and FFO per diluted share and OP Unit, as adjusted, which are non-GAAP measures, for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, to show the effect of such items as gain or loss on debt extinguishment (including accelerated amortization of financing costs), impairment of assets, provision for employee separation expense, insurance recoveries or losses, net, gain on derecognition of property, gain/loss on hedge ineffectiveness and reorganization expenses which had an effect on our results of operations, but are not, in our opinion, indicative of our ongoing operating performance.
We believe that FFO is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it excludes various items included in net loss that do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, such as gains on sales of operating real estate and depreciation and amortization of real estate, among others. We believe that Funds From Operations, as adjusted, is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it adjusts FFO to exclude items that management does not believe are indicative of our operating performance, such as provision for employee separation expense, gain on hedge ineffectiveness and reorganization expenses.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss determined in accordance with GAAP to FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders, FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders per diluted share and OP Unit, FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders, as adjusted and FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders, as adjusted per diluted share and OP Unit, for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(32,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,980 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization on real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consolidated properties |
|
|
28,798 |
|
|
|
29,491 |
|
PREIT’s share of equity method investments |
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
3,187 |
|
Funds from operations attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders |
|
|
(1,153 |
) |
|
|
(11,302 |
) |
Provision for employee separation expense |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Gain on hedge ineffectiveness |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
Reorganization expenses |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Gain on sale of preferred equity interest |
|
|
(3,688 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Funds from operations, as adjusted, attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders |
|
$ |
(4,757 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,316 |
) |
Funds from operations attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders per diluted share and OP Unit (1) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
Funds from operations, as adjusted, attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders per diluted share and OP Unit (1) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
79,577 |
|
|
|
77,647 |
|
Weighted average effect of full conversion of OP Units |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
Effect of common share equivalents |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
691 |
|
Total weighted average shares outstanding, including OP Units |
|
|
80,608 |
|
|
|
80,314 |
|
(1) Does not include the impact of $6.8 million of accrued, undeclared and unpaid preferred share dividends for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company cannot declare and pay cash dividends on common shares while there exists a preferred dividend arrearage.
FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders was negative $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, an increase of $10.1 million, or 89.8%, compared to negative $11.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. This increase was primarily due to:
33
FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders per diluted share and OP Unit was $(0.01) and $(0.14) for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
FFO, as adjusted, attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders per diluted share and OP Unit was $(0.06) and $(0.15) for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
This “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section contains certain “forward-looking statements” that relate to expectations and projections that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about our future liquidity and capital resources, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that might cause our actual liquidity and capital resources to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Additional factors that might affect our liquidity and capital resources include those discussed herein and in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC. We do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements about our liquidity and capital resources to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.
Capital Resources
We currently expect to meet certain of our short-term liquidity requirements, including operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions, generally through our available working capital and our First Lien Revolving Facility, subject to the terms and conditions of our First Lien Credit Agreement. See “Credit Agreements—Similar terms of the Credit Agreements” below for covenant information. We expect to spend approximately $4.1 million related to our capital improvements and development projects in 2022. We believe that our net cash provided by operations will be sufficient to allow us to make any distributions necessary to enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Our Credit Agreements limit our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common and preferred shares, subject to certain exceptions. We have deferred payments on our preferred shares and suspended payments on our common shares since the third quarter of 2020. Other than as may be required to maintain our status as a REIT, we do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends to holders of our common or preferred shares for the foreseeable future.
As a result of the existing cumulative unpaid dividends on our preferred shares and our bankruptcy filing, we are no longer able to register the offer and sale of securities on Form S-3. This creates additional limitations on our ability to raise capital in the capital markets, potentially increasing our costs of raising capital in the future. Our ability to raise capital in the capital markets may also be impacted by market fluctuations more generally, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic downturn.
We have availability under our revolving facility of $76.2 million as of March 31, 2022. We have been focused on improving operational efficiency and driving stable and increasing cash flows from operations while advancing our portfolio, including by undertaking, with the assistance of outside advisors, a thorough review of our business and capital structure and evaluating a wide range of opportunities to further strengthen our balance sheet and financial flexibility. We are actively seeking to raise additional capital, including through asset dispositions identified through our portfolio property reviews. Disposing of these properties can enable us to redeploy or recycle our capital to other uses. In many cases, we are marketing land parcels for development for a variety of different nontraditional, non-retail uses, including hotel, multifamily residential and healthcare uses, which we believe can also help position our portfolio within differentiated mixed-use environments. In 2022, we executed agreements of sale for Exton Square Mall and a former Sears TBA location. The mall and retail space along with previously executed land parcel sale agreements are expected to provide an aggregate of up to approximately $110.0 million in gross proceeds. The proceeds from our anticipated property sales will primarily be used to repay amounts outstanding under our Credit Agreements. These agreements include the sale of a mall, sale of land parcels for multifamily residential development, the sale of operating outparcels and the sale of land parcels for hotel development. Each of the transactions is subject to numerous closing conditions, including the completion of due diligence and securing of entitlements, which in several cases has been delayed due to the effects of COVID-19 on business operations and availability of financing. Closing of the transactions cannot be assured or the timing of their completion yet estimated with certainty.
The following are some of the factors that could affect our cash flows and require the funding of future cash distributions, recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements or leasing commissions with sources other than operating cash flows:
34
In addition, we are continuing to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic and the related restrictions and changes to behavior intended to reduce its spread, and its impact on our tenants, their supply chains and customers and the retail industry. Thus far, the pandemic and the actions taken to address it and the related overall worsening of economic conditions have had an adverse effect on our business, operations, liquidity and financial condition.
As of March 31, 2022, all of our malls had re-opened while adhering to social distancing and sanitation and safety protocols designed to address the risks posed by COVID-19, however, many of our tenants continue to operate at reduced capacity. The pandemic’s effect, primarily beginning in the second quarter of 2020, had a significant impact on our operations, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations in 2020, 2021, and the first quarter of 2022 and its impact is expected to continue through future periods. We believe that our rent collections are probable, but expect that collections will continue to be below our tenants’ rent obligations as long as lingering effects of COVID-19, including new or renewed restrictions and business closures, affect the return of customers to malls and the financial strength of our tenants. While we continue to record rental revenue, the reduced collection levels have impacted our liquidity position and may continue to do so. The extent and duration of such effects are uncertain, continuously changing and difficult to predict. Additionally, the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results.
We expect to meet certain of our longer-term requirements, such as obligations to fund redevelopment and development projects, certain capital requirements, renovations, expansions and other non-recurring capital improvements, through a variety of capital sources, subject to the terms and conditions of our Credit Agreements, as further described below.
LIBOR Alternative
In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which is the authority that regulates LIBOR, announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to USD-LIBOR for use in derivatives and other financial contracts that are currently indexed to USD-LIBOR. The FCA no longer publishes one-week and two-month U.S. dollar LIBOR rates and plans to cease publishing all other LIBOR tenors (overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month and 12-month) on June 30, 2023. It is not presently known whether SOFR or any other alternative reference rates will attain broad market acceptance as replacements of LIBOR. There remains uncertainty as to how the financial services industry will address the discontinuance of LIBOR in financial instruments that are indexed to LIBOR. Further, various financial instruments indexed to LIBOR could experience different outcomes based on their contractual terms, ability to amend those terms, market or product type, legal or regulatory jurisdiction, and other factors. Alternative reference rates that replace LIBOR may not yield the same or similar economic results over the lives of the financial instruments, which could adversely affect the value of and return on these instruments.
We have material contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and are monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest on loans or amounts received and paid on derivative instruments. These risks arise in connection with transitioning contracts to a new alternative rate, including any resulting value transfer that may occur. The value of loans, securities, and derivative instruments tied to LIBOR could also be affected if LIBOR is limited or discontinued. For some instruments, the method of transitioning to an alternative rate may be challenging, as they may require negotiation with the respective counterparty.
If a contract is not transitioned to an alternative rate and LIBOR is discontinued, the impact on our contracts is likely to vary by contract. If LIBOR is phased out and changes implemented, interest rates on our current or future indebtedness may be adversely affected.
While we expect LIBOR to be available in substantially its current form until the end of 2022, it is possible that LIBOR will become unavailable prior to that point. This could occur, for example, if a requisite number of banks decline to make submissions to the LIBOR administrator. In that case, the risks associated with the transition to an alternative reference rate would be accelerated and magnified.
Credit Agreements
We have entered into two secured credit agreements (collectively, as amended, the “Credit Agreements”): (a) the First Lien Credit Agreement, which, as described in more detail below, includes (i) the $130.0 million First Lien Revolving Facility, and (ii) the $384.5 million First Lien Term Loan Facility, and (b) the Second Lien Credit Agreement, which, as described in more detail below, includes the $535.2 million Second Lien Term Loan Facility. The First Lien Term Loan Facility and the Second Lien Term Loan Facility are collectively referred to as the “Term Loans.” The Credit Agreements refinanced our previously existing credit agreements in effect prior to the effective date, including our secured term loan under the Credit Agreement dated as of August 11, 2020 (as amended, the “Bridge Credit Agreement”), our Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement entered into on January 8, 2014 (as amended, the “7-Year Term Loan”), and our 2018 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement entered into on May 24, 2018 (as amended, the “2018 Credit Agreement”).
As of March 31, 2022, we had borrowed $976.5 million under the Term Loans and $53.8 million under the First Lien Revolving Facility. The carrying value of the Term Loans on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2022 is net of $4.8 million of unamortized debt issuance
35
costs. The maximum amount that was available to be borrowed by us under the First Lien Revolving Facility as of March 31, 2022 was $76.2 million.
Our obligations under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries. Our obligations under the Credit Agreements and the guaranties are secured by mortgages and deeds of trust on a portfolio of 12 of our subsidiaries’ properties, including nine malls and three additional parcels. The obligations are further secured by a lien on substantially all of our personal property pursuant to collateral agreements and a pledge of substantially all of the equity interests held by us and the guarantors, pursuant to pledge agreements, in each case subject to limited exceptions.
The maturity date of the Credit Agreements is December 10, 2022 (or such earlier date that the obligations under the applicable Credit Agreement have been accelerated), unless extended by one year until December 10, 2023 at our option (the “Maturity Date”). Any such extension would be subject to our fulfillment of certain conditions including maintaining minimum liquidity of $35.0 million, a minimum corporate debt yield of 8.0% and a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 105% for the total first lien and second lien loans and letters of credit and the Borrowing Base Properties as determined by an appraisal (provided that we may obtain a second appraisal of each Borrowing Base Property prepared by a nationally recognized appraisal firm and use the highest appraised value), and provided that no default or event of default exists and our representations and warranties are true in all material respects.
First Lien Credit Agreement
On December 10, 2020, we entered into an Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement (the “First Lien Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo Bank”) and the other financial institutions signatory thereto and their assignees, for secured loan facilities consisting of: (i) a secured first lien revolving credit facility allowing for borrowings up to $130.0 million, including a sub-facility for letters of credit to be issued thereunder in an aggregate stated amount of up to $10.0 million (collectively, the “First Lien Revolving Facility”), and (ii) a $384.5 million secured first lien term loan facility (the “First Lien Term Loan Facility”).
Amounts borrowed under the First Lien Credit Agreement may be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bear interest at the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate will not be less than 1.50% per annum, in each case plus (w) for revolving loans, 2.50% per annum, and (x) for term loans, 4.74% per annum. LIBOR Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus (y) for revolving loans, 3.50% per annum, and (z) for term loans, 5.74% per annum, in each case, provided that LIBOR will not be less than 0.50% per annum. Interest is due to be paid in cash on the last day of each applicable interest period (with rolling 30-day interest periods) and on the Maturity Date. We must pay certain fees to the administrative agent for the account of the lenders in connection with the First Lien Credit Agreement, including an unused fee for the account of the revolving lenders, which will accrue (i) 0.35% per annum on the daily amount of the unused revolving commitments when that amount is greater than or equal to 50% of the aggregate amount of revolving commitments, and (ii) 0.25% when that amount is less than 50% of the aggregate amount of revolving commitments. Accrued and unpaid unused fees will be payable quarterly in arrears during the term of the First Lien Credit Agreement and on the Revolving Termination Date (or any earlier date of termination of the revolving commitments or reduction of the revolving commitments to zero).
Letters of credit and the proceeds of revolving loans may be used (i) to refinance indebtedness under the Bridge Credit Agreement (which agreement was canceled and refinanced upon our entry into the Credit Agreements), (ii) for working capital and general corporate purposes (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the First Lien Credit Agreement, including limitations on investments in non-Borrowing Base Properties), and (iii) to fund professional fee payments and other fees and expenses subject to the provisions of the Plan and related confirmation order and for other uses permitted by the provisions of the First Lien Credit Agreement, Plan and confirmation order, in each case consistent with an approved annual business plan. The proceeds of term loans may only be used to refinance existing indebtedness under the 2018 Credit Agreement and the 7-Year Term Loan. We may terminate or reduce the amount of the revolving commitments at any time and from time to time without penalty or premium, subject to the terms of the First Lien Credit Agreement.
Second Lien Credit Agreement
On December 10, 2020, we also entered into a Second Lien Credit Agreement (the “Second Lien Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank and the other financial institutions signatory thereto and their assignees for a $535.2 million secured second lien term loan facility (the “Second Lien Term Loan Facility”).
Amounts borrowed under the Second Lien Credit Agreement may be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bear interest at the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate will not be less than 1.50% per annum, in each case plus 7.00% per annum. LIBOR Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 8.00% per annum, provided that LIBOR will not be less than 0.50% per annum. Interest is due to be paid in kind on the last day of each applicable interest period (with rolling 30-day interest periods) by adding the accrued and unpaid amount thereof to the principal balance of the loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement and then accruing interest on the increased principal amount (provided that after the discharge of our Senior Debt Obligations, interest will be paid in cash). We must pay certain fees to the administrative agent for the account of the lenders in connection with the Second Lien Credit Agreement.
36
The proceeds of loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement may only be used to refinance existing indebtedness under the 2018 Credit Agreement and the 7-Year Term Loan.
On February 8, 2021, the Company entered into the first amendment to the Second Lien Credit Agreement (“First Amendment”). The First Amendment provided for elimination of approximately $5.3 million of the disputed default interest that was capitalized into the principal balance of the Second Lien Term Loan Facility, reducing the outstanding principal amount of loans outstanding under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, retroactively as of December 10, 2020, to $535.2 million. The First Amendment also eliminated the disputed PIK interest that was capitalized through the date of the amendment.
On April 13, 2021, we entered into Agency Resignation, Appointment, Acceptance and Waiver Agreements pursuant to which Wells Fargo Bank resigned as Administrative Agent and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB was appointed successor Administrative Agent under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the Second Lien Credit Agreement and, in each case, the related loan documents. There is currently no successor letter of credit issuer under the First Lien Revolving Facility, accordingly, the Company cannot currently access the letters of credit sub-facility.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 for additional information on the Credit Agreements.
FDP Loan Agreement
As described in note 4 of our consolidated financial statements, PM Gallery LP, a Delaware limited partnership and joint venture entity owned indirectly by us and The Macerich Company (“Macerich”), previously entered into a $250.0 million term loan in January 2018 (as amended in July 2019 to increase the total maximum potential borrowings to $350.0 million) to fund the ongoing redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia and to repay capital contributions to the venture previously made by the partners. On December 10, 2020, PM Gallery LP, together with certain other subsidiaries owned indirectly by us and Macerich (including the fee and leasehold owners of the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project), entered into an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (the “FDP Loan Agreement”). In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, a $100.0 million principal payment was made (and funded indirectly by Macerich) to pay down the existing loan, reducing the outstanding principal under the FDP Loan Agreement from $301.0 million to $201.0 million. In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, the governing structure of PM Gallery LP was modified such that, effective as of January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the entity’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions.
The FDP Loan Agreement provides for (i) a maturity date of January 22, 2023, with the potential for a one-year extension upon the borrowers’ satisfaction of certain conditions, (ii) an interest rate at the borrowers’ option with respect to each advance of either (A) the Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.00%) plus 2.50% or (B) LIBOR for the applicable period plus 3.50%, (iii) a full recourse guarantee of 50% of the borrowers’ obligations by PREIT Associates, L.P., on a several basis, (iv) a full recourse guarantee of certain of the borrowers’ obligations by The Macerich Partnership, L.P., up to a maximum of $50.0 million, on a several basis, (v) a pledge of the equity interests of certain indirect subsidiaries of PREIT and Macerich, as well as of PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. and one of its subsidiaries, that have a direct or indirect ownership interest in the borrowers, (vi) a non-recourse carve-out guaranty and a hazardous materials indemnity by each of PREIT Associates, L.P. and The Macerich Partnership, L.P., and (vii) mortgages of the borrowers’ fee and leasehold interests in the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project and certain other properties. The FDP Loan Agreement contains certain covenants typical for loans of its type. As noted above, PREIT Associates L.P. has severally guaranteed its 50% share of the FDP Term Loan (see Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements), which had $194.6 million outstanding as of March 31, 2022 (our share of which is $97.3 million). The joint venture also has the outstanding Partnership Loan of $118.6 million outstanding as of March 31, 2022 (our share of which is $59.3 million) and the proceeds of which were used to pay down the FDP Term Loan in December 2020. We monitor the joint venture's cash flow and its ability to meet its debt service requirements. If the joint venture were unable to satisfy its obligations under the FDP Term Loan, and we were required to satisfy the payment obligations under the guarantee, this could have a material impact on our liquidity and available capital resources. There are also circumstances in which a default of the FDP Term Loan could give rise to an event of default under our Credit Agreements.
37
Preferred Shares
We have 3,450,000 7.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series B Preferred Shares”) outstanding, 6,900,000 7.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series C Preferred Shares”) outstanding and 5,000,000 6.875% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series D Preferred Shares”) outstanding. Upon 30 days’ notice, we may redeem any or all of the Series B Preferred Shares or Series C Preferred Shares at $25.00 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. We may not redeem the Series D Preferred Shares before September 15, 2022, except to preserve our status as a REIT or upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, as defined in the Trust Agreement addendums designating the Series D Preferred Shares. On and after January 27, 2022 and September 15, 2022, we may redeem any or all of the Series C Preferred Shares or the Series D Preferred Shares, respectively, at $25.00 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. In addition, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, we may redeem any or all of the Series D Preferred Shares for cash within 120 days after the first date on which such Change of Control occurs at $25.00 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series B Preferred Shares, the Series C Preferred Shares and the Series D Preferred Shares have no stated maturity, are not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless we redeem or otherwise repurchase them or they are converted.
In 2020, the Company suspended payment of its preferred share dividends. Dividends on the Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shares are cumulative and therefore will continue to accrue at an annual rate of $1.8436 per share, $1.80 per share and $1.7188 per share, respectively. As of March 31, 2022, the cumulative amount of unpaid dividends on our issued and outstanding preferred shares totaled $47.9 million. This consisted of unpaid dividends per share on the Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shares of $3.23 per share, $3.15 per share and $3.01 per share, respectively.
Both the First Lien Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement prohibit any redemption of preferred shares so long as such agreements remain in effect.
Mortgage Loan Activity—Consolidated Properties
On December 10, 2021, we entered into an amendment to our mortgage loan secured by the property at Woodland Mall in Grand Rapids, Michigan, which provides for an extension of the maturity date until December 10, 2022. We capitalized $0.3 million of lender fees as additional debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we entered into forbearance and loan modification agreements for our consolidated properties Cherry Hill Mall, Cumberland Mall, Dartmouth Mall, Francis Scott Key Mall, Viewmont Mall, and Woodland Mall and for our unconsolidated partnership properties Metroplex and Springfield Mall. These arrangements allowed us to defer principal payments, and in some cases interest as well, on the mortgages between May and August of 2020 depending on the terms of the contract. At the end of each deferment period, the repayment period spans from four to six months to pay back the deferred amounts. The repayment periods ranged from August 2020 through February 2021 depending on the terms of the specific agreements. As of March 31, 2022, we had repaid all principal and interest deferrals.
In the second quarter of 2020, we defaulted on the mortgage loan secured by Valley View Mall due to a missed payment on June 1, 2020, and not paying the balloon payment of $27.2 million. In the third quarter of 2020, the operations of the property were transferred to a receiver and foreclosure was filed. We recorded a gain on derecognition of property during the third quarter 2020 and have recorded the mortgage balance and an offsetting contract asset on our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, both of which are to be eliminated when the property foreclosure sale is completed. In May 2022 the foreclosure proceedings were completed.
Mortgage Loans
Our mortgage loans, which are secured by nine of our consolidated properties, are due in installments over various terms extending to the year 2025. Our nine properties include Valley View Mall, which was assigned to a receiver in the third quarter 2020. Although we have not yet conveyed Valley View Mall because foreclosure proceedings are ongoing, we no longer control or operate the property as a result of a court order assigning the receiver. The mortgage principal balance of Valley View Mall was $27.2 million at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, which we continue to recognize until the foreclosure process is complete. Six of these mortgage loans bear interest at fixed interest rates that range from 3.88% to 5.95% and had a weighted average interest rate of 4.09% at March 31, 2022. Three of our mortgage loans bear interest at variable rates and had a weighted average interest rate of 3.73% at March 31, 2022. The weighted average interest rate of all consolidated mortgage loans was 4.00% at March 31, 2022. Mortgage loans for properties owned by unconsolidated partnerships are accounted for in “Investments in partnerships, at equity” and “Distributions in excess of partnership investments,” and are not included in the table below.
38
The following table outlines the timing of principal payments and balloon payments pursuant to the terms of our mortgage loans on our consolidated properties as of March 31, 2022:
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
Total |
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
2023-2024 |
|
|
2025-2026 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|||||
Principal payments |
|
$ |
26,607 |
|
|
$ |
9,209 |
|
|
$ |
12,992 |
|
|
$ |
4,406 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Balloon payments |
|
|
819,838 |
|
|
|
429,239 |
|
|
|
179,253 |
|
|
|
211,346 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
|
846,445 |
|
|
$ |
438,448 |
|
|
$ |
192,245 |
|
|
$ |
215,752 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Carrying value of mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
844,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents our aggregate contractual obligations as of March 31, 2022 for the periods presented:
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
Total |
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
2023-2024 |
|
|
2025-2026 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|||||
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
846,445 |
|
|
$ |
438,448 |
|
(1) |
$ |
192,245 |
|
|
$ |
215,752 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Term Loans |
|
|
1,011,940 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,011,940 |
|
(2) |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
First Lien Revolving Facility |
|
|
53,818 |
|
|
|
53,818 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Interest on indebtedness(3) |
|
|
73,021 |
|
|
|
40,744 |
|
|
|
25,896 |
|
|
|
6,381 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
9,349 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
5,038 |
|
Ground leases |
|
|
51,144 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
|
43,620 |
|
Finance leases |
|
|
5,674 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
Development and redevelopment commitments(4) |
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,055,466 |
|
|
$ |
537,896 |
|
|
$ |
1,238,920 |
|
|
$ |
228,844 |
|
|
$ |
49,806 |
|
(1) The 2022 balance includes $27.2 million for our mortgage loan secured by Valley View Mall, which was in default as of March 31, 2022. We do not expect to pay the principal balance remaining.
(2) Includes our First Lien Term Loan of $377.7 million and the anticipated maturity date balance of our Second Lien Term Loan Facility of $634.2 million, which includes estimated capitalized PIK interest based on current interest rates.
(3) Includes interest payments expected to be made on consolidated debt, including those in connection with interest rate swap agreements.
(4) The timing of the payments of these amounts is uncertain. We expect that a significant majority of such payments (of which we include 100% of our obligations related to Fashion District Philadelphia, which opened in September 2019) will be made prior to December 31, 2022, but cannot provide any assurance that changed circumstances at these projects will not delay the settlement of these obligations.
Interest Rate Derivative Agreements
As of March 31, 2022, we had interest rate swap agreements designated in qualifying hedging relationships outstanding with a weighted average base interest rate of 2.70% on a notional amount of $300.0 million, maturing in May 2023. We originally entered into these interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge the interest payments associated with our issuances of variable interest rate long term debt. The interest rate swap agreements are net settled monthly.
For derivatives that have been designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income” and subsequently reclassified into “Interest expense, net” in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Through December 10, 2020, all of our derivatives were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.
On December 10, 2020 as a result of the Financial Restructuring, we de-designated seven of our interest rate swaps which were previously designated cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan, as the hedged forecasted transactions were no longer probable to occur during the hedged time period due to the Financial Restructuring as described in Note 1. As such, the Company accelerated the reclassification of a portion of the amounts in other comprehensive (loss) income to earnings which resulted in a loss of $2.8 million that was recorded within interest expense, net in the consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, on December 10, 2020, the Company voluntarily de-designated the remaining thirteen interest swaps that were also previously designated as cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan. Upon de-designation, the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income balance of each of these de-designated derivatives will be separately reclassified to earnings as the originally hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. Through December 10, 2020, the changes in fair value of the derivatives were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated balance sheets.
On December 22, 2020, we re-designated nine interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $375.0 million as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk against the First Lien Term Loan Facility. These interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting treatment with changes in the fair value of the derivatives recorded through accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.
39
As of March 31, 2022, we had 7 total derivatives which were designated as cash flow hedges.
We recognize all derivatives at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Our derivative assets are recorded in “Deferred costs and other assets” and our derivative liabilities are recorded in “Fair value of derivative instruments.”
Over the next twelve months we estimate that $2.7 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense in connection with our designated derivatives. The recognition of these amounts could be accelerated in the event that we repay amounts outstanding on the debt instruments and do not replace them with new borrowings.
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are also used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. For swaps that were not re-designated subsequent to December 10, 2020, changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded directly in earnings as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2021 we had four non-designated swaps mature. As of March 31, 2022, we had no derivatives which were non-designated.
CASH FLOWS
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $16.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. This decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital between periods primarily as a result of strong collections of outstanding accounts receivable in the prior year first quarter, which are included in change in other assets in our statement of cash flows.
Cash flows used in investing activities were $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to cash flows used in investing activities of $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. Cash flows used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2022 included $1.4 million of additions to construction in progress and $2.7 million of investments in real estate improvements offset by $2.4 million of proceeds from sale of preferred equity interest.
Cash flows used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2021 included $1.0 million of additions to construction in progress and $1.9 million of investments in real estate improvements.
Cash flows used in financing activities were $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to cash flows used by financing activities of $10.6 for the three months ended March 31, 2021. Cash flows used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2022 included $6.0 million of principal payments on mortgage loans, along with $0.2 million of deferred financing costs paid for our Woodland Mall mortgage extension. Aggregate repayments on our First Lien Revolving Facility and Term Loan were $0.7 million and $1.7 million. Additionally, the value of shares retired under the equity incentive plan, net of shares issued, was $5.4 million.
Cash flows used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2021 included $9.5 million of principal payments on mortgage loans, along with $0.3 million of deferred financing costs paid for our Woodland Mall mortgage extension. We also had $0.6 million of shares retired under our equity compensation plan, net of shares issued.
ENVIRONMENTAL
We are aware of certain environmental matters at some of our properties. We have, in the past, performed remediation of such environmental matters, and we are not aware of any significant remaining potential liability relating to these environmental matters or of any obligation to satisfy requirements for further remediation. We may be required in the future to perform testing relating to these matters. We have insurance coverage for certain environmental claims up to $10.0 million per occurrence and up to $10.0 million in the aggregate over our two year policy term. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors— Risks Related to Our Business and Our Properties—We might incur costs to comply with environmental laws, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.”
COMPETITION AND TENANT CREDIT RISK
Competition in the retail real estate market is intense. We compete with other public and private retail real estate companies, including companies that own or manage malls, power centers, strip centers, lifestyle centers, factory outlet centers, theme/festival centers and community centers, as well as other commercial real estate developers and real estate owners, particularly those with properties near our properties, on the basis of several factors, including location and rent charged. We compete with these companies to attract customers to our properties, as well as to attract anchor and non-anchor store and other tenants. Our malls and our other operating properties face competition from similar retail, destination dining and entertainment centers, including more recently developed or renovated centers that are near our properties. We also face competition from a variety of different retail formats, including internet retailers, discount or value retailers, home shopping networks, mail order operators, catalogs, and telemarketers. Our tenants face competition from companies at the same and other properties and from other retail formats as well, including internet retailers. They also face competition for employees in the current largely constrained labor market, which could impact their operations and operation costs. This competition could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the amount of rent and expense reimbursements that we receive.
40
The existence or development of competing retail properties and the related increased competition for tenants might, subject to the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreements, require us to make capital improvements to properties that we would have deferred or would not have otherwise planned to make and might also affect the total sales, occupancy and net operating income of such properties. Any such capital improvements, undertaken individually or collectively, would involve costs and expenses that could adversely affect our results of operations.
If we seek to make acquisitions, competitors (such as institutional investors, other REITs and other owner-operators of retail properties) might drive up the price we must pay for properties, parcels, other assets or other companies or might themselves succeed in acquiring those properties, parcels, assets or companies. In addition, our potential acquisition targets might find our competitors to be more attractive suitors if they have greater resources, are willing to pay more, or have a more compatible operating philosophy. We might not succeed in acquiring retail properties or development sites that we seek, or, if we pay a higher price for a property and/or generate lower cash flow from an acquired property than we expect, our investment returns will be reduced, which will adversely affect the value of our securities.
We receive a substantial portion of our operating income as rent under leases with tenants. At any time, any tenant having space in one or more of our properties could experience a downturn in its business that might weaken its financial condition. Such tenants might enter into or renew leases with relatively shorter terms. Such tenants might also defer or fail to make rental payments when due, delay or defer lease commencement, voluntarily vacate the premises or declare bankruptcy, which could result in the termination of the tenant’s lease or preclude the collection of rent in connection with the space for a period of time, and could result in material losses to us and harm to our results of operations. Also, it might take time to terminate leases of underperforming or nonperforming tenants and we might incur costs to remove such tenants. Some of our tenants occupy stores at multiple locations in our portfolio, and so the effect of any bankruptcy or store closings of those tenants might be more significant to us than the bankruptcy or store closings of other tenants. In addition, under many of our leases, our tenants pay rent based, in whole or in part, on a percentage of their sales. Accordingly, declines in these tenants’ sales directly affect our results of operations. Also, if tenants are unable to comply with the terms of their leases, or otherwise seek changes to the terms, including changes to the amount of rent, we might modify lease terms in ways that are less favorable to us. Given current conditions in the economy, certain industries and the capital markets, in some instances retailers that have sought protection from creditors under bankruptcy law have had difficulty in obtaining debtor-in-possession financing, which has decreased the likelihood that such retailers will emerge from bankruptcy protection and has limited their alternatives. All of these factors have been exacerbated by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, 2021 and the first quarter of 2022.
SEASONALITY
There is seasonality in the retail real estate industry. Retail property leases often provide for the payment of all or a portion of rent based on a percentage of a tenant’s sales revenue, or sales revenue over certain levels. Income from such rent is recorded only after the minimum sales levels have been met. The sales levels are often met in the fourth quarter, during the November/December holiday season. Also, many new and temporary leases are entered into later in the year in anticipation of the holiday season and a higher number of tenants vacate their space early in the year. As a result, our occupancy and cash flows are generally higher in the fourth quarter and lower in the first and second quarters. Our concentration in the retail sector increases our exposure to seasonality and has resulted, and is expected to continue to result, in a greater percentage of our cash flows being received in the fourth quarter.
INFLATION
Inflation can have many effects on financial performance. Retail property leases often provide for the payment of rent based on a percentage of sales, which might increase with inflation. Customers might spend less at our retailers, which might decrease our rent based on a percentage of sales, due to inflation. Leases might also provide for tenants to bear all or a portion of operating expenses, which might reduce the impact of such increases on us. However, rent increases might not keep up with inflation, or if we recover a smaller proportion of property operating expenses, we might bear more costs if such expenses increase because of inflation.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 , together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us, contain certain forward-looking statements that can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “may” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans, strategies, anticipated events, trends and other matters, including our expectations regarding the impact of COVID-19 on our business, that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events, achievements, results, cost reductions, dividend payments and the impact of COVID-19 and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that might cause future events, achievements or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular, our business might be materially and adversely affected by the following:
41
Additional factors that might cause future events, achievements or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements include those discussed herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and any subsequent reports we file with the SEC. We do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.
42
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market interest rates. As of March 31, 2022, our consolidated debt portfolio consisted of $845.0 million of fixed and variable rate mortgage loans (net of debt issuance costs), $53.8 million outstanding under our First Lien Revolver, which bore interest at a rate of 4.0%, $377.7 million borrowed under our First Lien Term Loan Facility, which bore interest at a rate of 6.2%, and $598.8 million borrowed under our Second Lien Term Loan Facility, which bore interest at a rate of 8.5%.
Our mortgage loans, which are secured by nine of our consolidated properties, are due in installments over various terms extending to October 2025. Our nine properties include Valley View Mall, which was assigned to a receiver in the third quarter of 2020. Although we had not yet conveyed Valley View Mall due to ongoing foreclosure proceedings, we no longer control or operate the property as a result of court order assigning the receiver. The mortgage principal balance of Valley View Mall was $27.2 million at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, which we continue to recognize until the foreclosure process is completed. In May 2022, the foreclosure proceedings were completed. Six of our mortgage loans bear interest at fixed interest rates that range from 3.88% to 5.95%, and had a weighted average interest rate of 4.09% at March 31, 2022. Three of our mortgage loans bear interest at variable rates, a portion of which has been swapped to fixed rates, and had a weighted average interest rate of 3.73% at March 31, 2022. The weighted average interest rate of all consolidated mortgage loans was 4.00% at March 31, 2022. Mortgage loans for properties owned by unconsolidated partnerships are accounted for in “Investments in partnerships, at equity” and “Distributions in excess of partnership investments” on the consolidated balance sheets and are not included in the table below.
Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts of the expected annual maturities due in the respective years and the weighted average interest rates for the principal payments in the specified periods:
|
|
Fixed Rate Debt |
|
|
Variable Rate Debt |
|
||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
Principal |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Weighted |
|
||||
2022 |
|
$ |
325,698 |
|
|
|
3.96 |
% |
|
$ |
1,143,087 |
|
(2) |
|
7.44 |
% |
2023 |
|
|
59,887 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
2024 |
|
|
6,405 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
% |
|
|
125,953 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
2025 |
|
|
215,752 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
2026 and thereafter |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
(1) Based on the weighted average interest rates in effect as of March 31, 2022 and does not include the effect of our interest rate swap derivative instruments as described below.
(2) Includes term loan debt of $976.5 million under our First Lien Term Loan Facility and Second Lien Term Loan Facility with a weighted average interest rate of 7.63% as of March 31, 2022.
As of March 31, 2022, we had $1,269.0 million of variable rate debt. To manage interest rate risk and limit overall interest cost, we may employ interest rate swaps, options, forwards, caps and floors, or a combination thereof, depending on the underlying exposure. Interest rate differentials that arise under swap contracts are recognized in interest expense over the life of the contracts. If interest rates rise, the resulting cost of funds is expected to be lower than that which would have been available if debt with matching characteristics was issued directly. Conversely, if interest rates fall, the resulting costs would be expected to be, and in some cases have been, higher. We may also employ forwards or purchased options to hedge qualifying anticipated transactions. Gains and losses are deferred and recognized in net loss in the same period that the underlying transaction occurs, expires or is otherwise terminated. See Note 6 of the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for further information.
As of March 31, 2022, we had interest rate swap agreements outstanding with a weighted average base interest rate of 2.70% on a notional amount of $300.0 million, maturing in May 2023. See Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Interest Rate Derivative Agreements for a discussion of changes to the designation of certain of our interest rate swap agreements in 2020.
Changes in market interest rates have different effects on the fixed and variable rate portions of our debt portfolio. A change in market interest rates applicable to the fixed portion of the debt portfolio affects the fair value, but it has no effect on interest incurred or cash flows. A change in market interest rates applicable to the variable portion of the debt portfolio affects the interest incurred and cash flows, but does not affect the fair value. The following sensitivity analysis related to our debt portfolio, which includes the effects of our interest rate swap agreements, assumes an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates from their actual March 31, 2022 levels, with all other variables held constant.
A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would have resulted in a decrease in our net financial instrument position of $34.1 million at March 31, 2022. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would have resulted in an increase in our net financial instrument position
43
of $19.6 million at March 31, 2022. Based on the variable rate debt included in our debt portfolio at March 31, 2022, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have resulted in an additional $4.8 million in interest expense annually. A 100 basis point decrease would have reduced interest incurred by $4.8 million annually.
Because the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of March 31, 2022, it does not consider changes, exposures or positions which have arisen or could arise after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate realized gain or loss or expense with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at the time and interest rates.
44
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
We are committed to providing accurate and timely disclosure in satisfaction of our SEC reporting obligations. In 2002, we established a Disclosure Committee to formalize our disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that:
information that we are required to disclose in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and
material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that as of March 31, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
The ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was due to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which we identified and previously reported in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Management’s Remediation Efforts
Management of the Company and the Board of Trustees are committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment and to making further progress in its remediation efforts during 2022. During 2021, we commenced efforts at the remediation of a material weakness identified as of December 31, 2020. Our remediation activities that commenced in 2021 did result in attracting and retaining sufficient personnel with requisite financial expertise and appropriately considering risks of fraud, including the possibility of management override of controls and proper segregation of duties, and our remediation activities are ongoing. The Company's 2021 remediation measures included the following:
Management believes that it is making progress with the ongoing remediation efforts to design, implement, and enhance precision of management review controls and ensure reliability of information used in the controls will reduce the risk that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We will monitor and evaluate the remediation steps to ensure our internal control over financial reporting is effective to address control deficiencies or as we determine it necessary to modify the remediation plan described above. We will continue to report regularly to our Audit Committee on the progress of our remediation plan.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other than our actions to remediate the material weaknesses relating to our internal controls over financial reporting as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
45
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In the normal course of business, we have become and might in the future become involved in legal actions relating to our business, including but not limited to commercial disputes, rent collection actions and other matters related to the ownership and operation of our properties and the properties that we manage for third parties. In management’s opinion, the resolution of any such pending legal actions is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On November 1, 2020, we and certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries commenced voluntary cases under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware under the caption In re Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, et al. and filed our prepackaged chapter 11 plan of reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court. On November 30, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Plan. The Plan became effective and we subsequently emerged from bankruptcy on December 10, 2020. The final decree closing the bankruptcy case was entered by the Bankruptcy Court on March 11, 2021.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risks that could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, which are discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not acquire any shares in the three months ended March 31, 2022.
Limitations upon the Payment of Dividends
The Credit Agreements provide generally that we may only make dividend payments in the minimum amount necessary to maintain our status as a REIT. We must maintain our status as a REIT at all times.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
Preferred Dividend Arrearage
Dividends on the Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shares are cumulative and therefore will continue to accrue at an annual rate of $0.4609 per share, $0.45 per share and $0.4297 per share, respectively. As of May 6, 2022, the cumulative amount of unpaid dividends on our issued and outstanding preferred shares totaled $47.9 million. This consisted of unpaid dividends per share on the Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shares of $3.23 per share, $3.15 per share and $3.01 per share, respectively.
46
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
10.1+* |
|
|
|
10.2+* |
Form of Restricted Share Unit and Dividend Equivalent Rights Award Agreement. |
|
|
10.3+* |
Form of Performance Share Unit and Dividend Equivalent Rights Award Agreement. |
|
|
10.4+* |
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
|
|
32.1** |
|
|
|
32.2** |
|
|
|
101.INS* |
Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
|
|
101.SCH* |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
101.CAL* |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
101.DEF* |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
|
101.LAB* |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
101.PRE* |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
104* |
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.INS). |
47
* Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
48
SIGNATURE OF REGISTRANT
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST |
|
Date: |
May 6, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Joseph F. Coradino |
|
|
|
Joseph F. Coradino |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. |
|
|
|
Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Sathana Semonsky |
|
|
|
Sathana Semonsky |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
49