Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-54691
PHILLIPS EDISON GROCERY CENTER REIT I, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland | 27-1106076 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
11501 Northlake Drive Cincinnati, Ohio | 45249 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(513) 554-1110
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Accelerated Filer | ¨ |
Non-Accelerated Filer | þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Emerging growth company | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
As of July 31, 2017, there were 183.4 million outstanding shares of common stock of Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
PHILLIPS EDISON GROCERY CENTER REIT I, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2017 AND DECEMBER 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Investment in real estate: | |||||||
Land and improvements | $ | 824,718 | $ | 796,192 | |||
Building and improvements | 1,614,465 | 1,532,888 | |||||
Acquired in-place lease assets | 222,527 | 212,916 | |||||
Acquired above-market lease assets | 42,860 | 42,009 | |||||
Total investment in real estate assets | 2,704,570 | 2,584,005 | |||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (390,662 | ) | (334,348 | ) | |||
Total investment in real estate assets, net | 2,313,908 | 2,249,657 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 5,367 | 8,224 | |||||
Restricted cash | 5,499 | 41,722 | |||||
Other assets, net | 86,480 | 80,585 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 2,411,254 | $ | 2,380,188 | |||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||
Mortgages and loans payable, net | $ | 1,167,847 | $ | 1,056,156 | |||
Acquired below-market lease liabilities, net of accumulated amortization of $23,363 and $20,255, respectively | 42,546 | 43,032 | |||||
Accounts payable – affiliates | 5,155 | 4,571 | |||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 54,125 | 51,642 | |||||
Total liabilities | 1,269,673 | 1,155,401 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) | — | — | |||||
Equity: | |||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 10,000 shares authorized, zero shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 | |||||||
and December 31, 2016, respectively | — | — | |||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 183,059 and 185,062 shares issued and | |||||||
outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 1,831 | 1,851 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,606,688 | 1,627,098 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 9,787 | 10,587 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (499,198 | ) | (438,155 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,119,108 | 1,201,381 | |||||
Noncontrolling interests | 22,473 | 23,406 | |||||
Total equity | 1,141,581 | 1,224,787 | |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,411,254 | $ | 2,380,188 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
PHILLIPS EDISON GROCERY CENTER REIT I, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 53,167 | $ | 47,256 | $ | 104,260 | $ | 94,195 | |||||||
Tenant recovery income | 16,454 | 15,509 | 33,390 | 31,453 | |||||||||||
Other property income | 230 | 288 | 504 | 487 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 69,851 | 63,053 | 138,154 | 126,135 | |||||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Property operating | 10,297 | 9,657 | 21,729 | 19,948 | |||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 10,155 | 9,230 | 20,413 | 18,641 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 8,896 | 8,461 | 16,726 | 16,014 | |||||||||||
Acquisition expenses | 313 | 1,502 | 264 | 1,522 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 28,207 | 25,977 | 55,831 | 51,683 | |||||||||||
Total expenses | 57,868 | 54,827 | 114,963 | 107,808 | |||||||||||
Other: | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | (9,501 | ) | (7,601 | ) | (17,891 | ) | (15,333 | ) | |||||||
Transaction expenses | (4,383 | ) | — | (6,023 | ) | — | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 680 | (42 | ) | 636 | (158 | ) | |||||||||
Net (loss) income | (1,221 | ) | 583 | (87 | ) | 2,836 | |||||||||
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 28 | (23 | ) | — | (57 | ) | |||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders | $ | (1,193 | ) | $ | 560 | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 2,779 | |||||
Earnings per common share: | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income per share attributable to stockholders - basic | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||||
Net (loss) income per share attributable to stockholders - diluted | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | 0.01 | |||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 183,126 | 183,514 | 183,178 | 182,880 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 183,126 | 186,299 | 183,178 | 185,665 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (1,221 | ) | $ | 583 | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 2,836 | |||||
Other comprehensive loss: | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivatives | (2,994 | ) | (3,240 | ) | (1,775 | ) | (11,547 | ) | |||||||
Reclassification of derivative loss to interest expense | 378 | 928 | 975 | 1,874 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive loss | (3,837 | ) | (1,729 | ) | (887 | ) | (6,837 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 28 | (23 | ) | — | (57 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to stockholders | $ | (3,809 | ) | $ | (1,752 | ) | $ | (887 | ) | $ | (6,894 | ) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
PHILLIPS EDISON GROCERY CENTER REIT I, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Accumulated Deficit | Total Stockholders’ Equity | Noncontrolling Interest | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 | 181,308 | $ | 1,813 | $ | 1,588,541 | $ | 22 | $ | (323,761 | ) | $ | 1,266,615 | $ | 25,177 | $ | 1,291,792 | ||||||||||||||
Share repurchases | (396 | ) | (4 | ) | (3,885 | ) | — | — | (3,889 | ) | — | (3,889 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) | 2,961 | 30 | 30,160 | — | — | 30,190 | — | 30,190 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps | — | — | — | (9,673 | ) | — | (9,673 | ) | — | (9,673 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common distributions declared, $0.34 per share | — | — | — | — | (60,946 | ) | (60,946 | ) | — | (60,946 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | (935 | ) | (935 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | 2,779 | 2,779 | 57 | 2,836 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2016 | 183,873 | $ | 1,839 | $ | 1,614,816 | $ | (9,651 | ) | $ | (381,928 | ) | $ | 1,225,076 | $ | 24,299 | $ | 1,249,375 | |||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2017 | 185,062 | $ | 1,851 | $ | 1,627,098 | $ | 10,587 | $ | (438,155 | ) | $ | 1,201,381 | $ | 23,406 | $ | 1,224,787 | ||||||||||||||
Share repurchases | (4,246 | ) | (42 | ) | (43,265 | ) | — | — | (43,307 | ) | — | (43,307 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
DRIP | 2,240 | 22 | 22,828 | — | — | 22,850 | — | 22,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps | — | — | — | (800 | ) | — | (800 | ) | — | (800 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common distributions declared, $0.34 per share | — | — | — | — | (60,956 | ) | (60,956 | ) | — | (60,956 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | (933 | ) | (933 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 3 | — | 27 | — | — | 27 | — | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | (87 | ) | (87 | ) | — | (87 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2017 | 183,059 | $ | 1,831 | $ | 1,606,688 | $ | 9,787 | $ | (499,198 | ) | $ | 1,119,108 | $ | 22,473 | $ | 1,141,581 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
PHILLIPS EDISON GROCERY CENTER REIT I, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 2,836 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 55,051 | 50,315 | |||||
Net amortization of above- and below-market leases | (686 | ) | (582 | ) | |||
Amortization of deferred financing expense | 2,389 | 2,093 | |||||
Net loss on write-off of unamortized capitalized leasing commissions, market debt adjustments, | |||||||
and deferred financing expense | (411 | ) | (7 | ) | |||
Straight-line rental income | (1,943 | ) | (1,725 | ) | |||
Other | (673 | ) | 172 | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Other assets | (8,327 | ) | 1,592 | ||||
Accounts payable – affiliates | 584 | (1,588 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 3,060 | 3,849 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 48,957 | 56,955 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Real estate acquisitions | (75,824 | ) | (94,385 | ) | |||
Capital expenditures | (11,483 | ) | (10,325 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sale of real estate | 37,037 | — | |||||
Change in restricted cash | 323 | (299 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (49,947 | ) | (105,009 | ) | |||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Net change in credit facility | 120,000 | 106,500 | |||||
Payments on mortgages and loans payable | (38,934 | ) | (57,159 | ) | |||
Distributions paid, net of DRIP | (38,520 | ) | (30,973 | ) | |||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | (782 | ) | (790 | ) | |||
Repurchases of common stock | (43,307 | ) | (3,748 | ) | |||
Payments of deferred financing expenses | (324 | ) | — | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (1,867 | ) | 13,830 | ||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (2,857 | ) | (34,224 | ) | |||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: | |||||||
Beginning of period | 8,224 | 40,680 | |||||
End of period | $ | 5,367 | $ | 6,456 | |||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE, INCLUDING NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 16,846 | $ | 14,843 | |||
Fair value of assumed debt | 30,832 | — | |||||
Accrued capital expenditures | 3,055 | 1,920 | |||||
Change in distributions payable | (414 | ) | (217 | ) | |||
Change in distributions payable - noncontrolling interests | 151 | 145 | |||||
Change in accrued share repurchase obligation | — | 141 | |||||
Distributions reinvested | 22,850 | 30,190 | |||||
Like-kind exchange of real estate: | |||||||
Utilization of restricted cash held for acquisitions | (35,900 | ) | — |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. ORGANIZATION
Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc. (“we,” the “Company,” “our,” or “us”) was formed as a Maryland corporation in October 2009. Substantially all of our business is conducted through Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, L.P., (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership formed in December 2009. We are a limited partner of the Operating Partnership, and our wholly owned subsidiary, Phillips Edison Grocery Center OP GP I LLC, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership.
We invest primarily in well-occupied, grocery-anchored, neighborhood and community shopping centers that have a mix of creditworthy national and regional retailers that sell necessity-based goods and services in strong demographic markets throughout the United States.
Our advisor is Phillips Edison NTR LLC (“PE-NTR”), which is directly or indirectly owned by Phillips Edison Limited Partnership (“Phillips Edison sponsor” or “PELP”). Under the terms of the advisory agreement between PE-NTR and us (“PE-NTR Agreement”), PE-NTR is responsible for the management of our day-to-day activities and the implementation of our investment strategy.
As of June 30, 2017, we owned fee simple interests in 158 real estate properties acquired from third parties unaffiliated with us or PE-NTR.
On May 18, 2017, we entered into a definitive contribution agreement to acquire certain real estate assets and the third party asset management business of our Phillips Edison sponsor in a stock and cash transaction valued at approximately $1.0 billion (“PELP transaction”), subject to closing adjustments. For a more detailed discussion, see Note 3.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Certain of our accounting estimates are particularly important for an understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by management. As a result, these estimates are subject to a degree of uncertainty. There have been no changes to our significant accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2017. For a full summary of our accounting policies, refer to our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 9, 2017.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation—The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Readers of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should refer to the audited consolidated financial statements of Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2016, which are included in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the periods presented have been included in this Quarterly Report. Our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.
Reclassifications—The following line items on our consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016, were reclassified:
• | Loss on Disposal of Real Estate Assets was reclassified to Other due to limited activity in the current period. |
• | Net Loss on Write-off of Unamortized Capitalized Leasing Commissions, Market Debt Adjustments, and Deferred Financing Expense was separately disclosed due to significance in the current period. In the previous period these amounts were included in Other. |
Newly Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements—We adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, on January 1, 2017, and applied it prospectively. For a more detailed discussion of this adoption, see Note 5.
6
The following table provides a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that could have a material effect on our financial statements:
Standard | Description | Date of Adoption | Effect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters | |||
ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20) | This update amends existing guidance in order to provide consistency in accounting for the derecognition of a business or nonprofit activity. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, but early adoption is permitted. | January 1, 2018 | We will adopt this standard concurrently with ASU 2014-09, listed above. We expect the adoption will impact our transactions that are subject to the amendments, which, although expected to be infrequent, would include a partial sale of real estate or contribution of a nonfinancial asset to form a joint venture. | |||
ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) | This update amends existing guidance in order to clarify the classification and presentation of restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, but early adoption is permitted. | January 1, 2018 | Upon adoption, we will include amounts generally described as restricted cash within the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts on the statement of cash flows rather than within an activity on the statement of cash flows. | |||
ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) | This update addresses the presentation of eight specific cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, but early adoption is permitted. | January 1, 2018 | We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements. Of the eight specific cash receipts and cash payments listed within this guidance, we believe only two would be applicable to our business as it stands currently: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs and proceeds from settlement of insurance claims. We will continue to evaluate the impact that adoption of the standard will have on our presentation of these and any other applicable cash receipts and cash payments. | |||
ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) | This update amends existing guidance by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, but early adoption is permitted. | January 1, 2019 | We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements. We have identified areas within our accounting policies we believe could be impacted by the new standard. We expect to have a change in presentation on our consolidated statement of operations with regards to Tenant Recovery Income, which includes reimbursement amounts we receive from tenants for operating expenses such as real estate taxes, insurance, and other common area maintenance. Additionally, this standard impacts the lessor’s ability to capitalize certain costs related to the leasing of vacant space, which will result in a reduction in the amount of execution costs currently being capitalized in connection with leasing activities. | |||
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) | This update outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While ASU 2014-09 specifically references contracts with customers, it also applies to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate or equipment. Expanded quantitative and qualitative disclosures are also required for contracts subject to ASU 2014-09. In 2015, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) provided for a one-year deferral of the effective date for ASU 2014-09, making it effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. | January 1, 2018 | Our revenue-producing contracts are primarily leases that are not within the scope of this standard. As a result, we do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our rental or reimbursement revenue. We currently plan to adopt this guidance on a modified retrospective basis. |
7
3. PELP ACQUISITION
On May 18, 2017, we entered into the PELP transaction valued at approximately $1.0 billion, subject to closing adjustments. Under the terms of the PELP transaction, PELP will receive approximately 45.2 million Operating Partnership units (“OP units”), inclusive of 4.8 million OP units and Class B units already outstanding, in the Operating Partnership, and approximately $50.0 million in cash in exchange for the contribution of PELP’s ownership interests in 76 shopping centers and its third party asset management business. On a pro forma basis, immediately following the closing of the transaction, our shareholders are expected to own approximately 80.2%, and former PELP shareholders are expected to own approximately 19.8% of the combined company.
PELP’s outstanding debt of approximately $501 million is expected to be refinanced or assumed by us at closing under the terms of the agreement. The agreement also includes an earn-out structure with an opportunity for PELP to receive up to an additional 12.49 million OP units if certain milestones are achieved related to a liquidity event for our shareholders and fundraising targets in PELP’s third non-traded REIT, Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT III.
The transaction was approved by the independent special committee of our board of directors, which had retained independent financial and legal advisors. The completion of this transaction is subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions, and is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2017. Although not required by law or under our governing documents, we have conditioned the closing of the transaction on the receipt of the approval of our shareholders. PELP will also seek the approval of its partners. For additional information, please see the Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on July 5, 2017 (the “Proxy Statement”).
The PELP transaction will be accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. As a result, costs incurred in connection with the PELP transaction are expensed and have been recorded as Transaction Expenses on our consolidated statements of operations.
4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following describes the methods we use to estimate the fair value of our financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities:
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, and Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities—We consider the carrying values of these financial instruments to approximate fair value because of the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization.
Real Estate Investments—The purchase prices of the investment properties, including related lease intangible assets and liabilities, were allocated at estimated fair value based on Level 3 inputs, such as discount rates, capitalization rates, comparable sales, replacement costs, income and expense growth rates, and current market rents and allowances as determined by management.
Mortgages and Loans Payable—We estimate the fair value of our debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at rates currently offered for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities by our lenders using Level 3 inputs. The discount rates used approximate current lending rates for loans or groups of loans with similar maturities and credit quality, assuming the debt is outstanding through maturity and considering the debt’s collateral (if applicable). We have utilized market information, as available, or present value techniques to estimate the amounts required to be disclosed.
The following is a summary of borrowings as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Fair value | $ | 1,171,842 | $ | 1,056,990 | ||||
Recorded value(1) | 1,175,945 | 1,065,180 |
(1) | Recorded value does not include deferred financing costs of $8.1 million and $9.0 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. |
Derivative Instruments—As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had three interest rate swaps that fixed LIBOR on $387 million of our unsecured term loan facility (“Term Loans”), as well as a forward starting interest rate swap, which became effective July 1, 2017, that fixes LIBOR on $255 million of our Term Loans. For a more detailed discussion of our cash flow hedges, see Note 8. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we were also party to an interest rate swap that fixed the variable interest rate on $10.9 million and $11.0 million, respectively, of one of our mortgage notes. The change in fair value of this instrument is recorded in Other Expense, Net on the consolidated statements of operations and was not material for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
All interest rate swap agreements are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of the interest rate swap agreements as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, were based on the estimated amounts we would receive or pay to
8
terminate the contracts at the reporting date and were determined using interest rate pricing models and interest rate-related observable inputs. Although we determined that the significant inputs used to value our derivatives fell within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our counterparties and our own credit risk utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
We record derivative assets in Other Assets, Net and derivative liabilities in Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The fair value measurements of our derivative assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, were as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Derivative asset: | |||||||
Interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments - Term Loans | $ | 11,126 | $ | 11,916 | |||
Derivative liability: | |||||||
Interest rate swap not designated as hedging instrument - mortgage note | 149 | 262 |
5. REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This update amends existing guidance in order to clarify when an integrated set of assets and activities is considered a business. We adopted ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, and applied it prospectively. Under this new guidance, most of our real estate acquisition activity will no longer be considered a business combination and will instead be classified as an asset acquisition. As a result, most acquisition-related costs that would have been recorded on our consolidated statements of operations have been capitalized and will be amortized over the life of the related assets. Costs incurred related to properties that were not ultimately acquired were recorded as Acquisition Expenses on our consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2017, none of our real estate acquisitions in 2017 met the definition of a business; therefore, we accounted for all as asset acquisitions.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we acquired five grocery-anchored shopping centers. Our first quarter acquisition closed out the reverse Section 1031 like-kind exchange outstanding as of December 31, 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we acquired two grocery-anchored shopping centers and additional real estate adjacent to a previously acquired shopping center.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we allocated the purchase price of our acquisitions, including acquisition costs for 2017, to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands):
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Land and improvements | $ | 27,139 | $ | 40,088 | |||
Building and improvements | 72,597 | 48,999 | |||||
Acquired in-place leases | 9,611 | 8,849 | |||||
Acquired above-market leases | 850 | 1,725 | |||||
Acquired below-market leases | (2,622 | ) | (5,728 | ) | |||
Total assets and lease liabilities acquired | 107,575 | 93,933 | |||||
Less: Fair value of assumed debt at acquisition | 30,832 | — | |||||
Net assets acquired | $ | 76,743 | $ | 93,933 |
The weighted-average amortization periods for in-place, above-market, and below-market lease intangibles acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, are as follows (in years):
2017 | 2016 | ||
Acquired in-place leases | 13 | 14 | |
Acquired above-market leases | 7 | 6 | |
Acquired below-market leases | 20 | 23 |
9
6. MORTGAGES AND LOANS PAYABLE
The following is a summary of the outstanding principal balances of our debt obligations as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Interest Rate(1) | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Revolving credit facility(2)(3) | 2.47% | $ | 296,969 | $ | 176,969 | ||||
Term loan due 2019(3) | 2.46% | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Term loan due 2020(3) | 2.65% | 175,000 | 175,000 | ||||||
Term loan due 2021 | 2.42%-2.80% | 125,000 | 125,000 | ||||||
Term loan due 2023 | 2.87% | 255,000 | 255,000 | ||||||
Mortgages payable(4) | 3.67%-7.91% | 219,833 | 228,721 | ||||||
Assumed market debt adjustments, net(5) | 4,143 | 4,490 | |||||||
Deferred financing costs, net(6) | (8,098 | ) | (9,024 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 1,167,847 | $ | 1,056,156 |
(1) | Includes the effects of derivative financial instruments (see Notes 4 and 8) as of June 30, 2017. |
(2) | The gross borrowings under our revolving credit facility were $191 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The gross payments on our revolving credit facility were $71 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The revolving credit facility had a capacity of $500 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. |
(3) | The revolving credit facility matures in December 2017. Prior to maturity and in connection with the PELP transaction, we anticipate refinancing this facility. If we do not refinance, we will exercise our option to extend the maturity to 2018. The term loans have options to extend their maturities to 2021. A maturity date extension for the first or second tranche on the term loans requires the payment of an extension fee of 0.15% of the outstanding principal amount of the corresponding tranche. |
(4) | Due to the non-recourse nature of our fixed-rate mortgages, the assets and liabilities of the properties securing such mortgages are neither available to pay the debts of the consolidated property-holding limited liability companies, nor do they constitute obligations of such consolidated limited liability companies as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. |
(5) | Net of accumulated amortization of $4.4 million and $6.1 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. |
(6) | Deferred financing costs shown are related to our Term Loans and mortgages payable and are net of accumulated amortization of $4.7 million and $3.9 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Deferred financing costs related to the revolving credit facility, which are included in Other Assets, Net, were $1.0 million and $2.2 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and are net of accumulated amortization of $7.9 million and $6.7 million, respectively. |
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the weighted-average interest rate for all of our mortgages and loans payable was 3.1% and 3.0%, respectively.
The allocation of total debt between fixed and variable-rate and between secured and unsecured, excluding market debt adjustments and deferred financing costs, as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, is summarized below (in thousands):
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
As to interest rate:(1) | |||||||
Fixed-rate debt | $ | 606,833 | $ | 615,721 | |||
Variable-rate debt | 564,969 | 444,969 | |||||
Total | $ | 1,171,802 | $ | 1,060,690 | |||
As to collateralization: | |||||||
Unsecured debt | $ | 951,968 | $ | 831,969 | |||
Secured debt | 219,834 | 228,721 | |||||
Total | $ | 1,171,802 | $ | 1,060,690 |
(1) | Includes the effects of derivative financial instruments (see Notes 4 and 8). |
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
We are involved in various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve claims for damages. Many of these matters are covered by insurance, although they may nevertheless be subject to deductibles
10
or retentions. Although the ultimate liability for these matters cannot be determined, based upon information currently available, we believe the ultimate resolution of such claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Environmental Matters
In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, we may potentially be liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. In addition, we may own or acquire certain properties that are subject to environmental remediation. Generally, the seller of the property, the tenant of the property, and/or another third party is responsible for environmental remediation costs related to a property. Additionally, in connection with the purchase of certain properties, the respective sellers and/or tenants may agree to indemnify us against future remediation costs. We also carry environmental liability insurance on our properties that provides limited coverage for any remediation liability and/or pollution liability for third-party bodily injury and/or property damage claims for which we may be liable. We are not aware of any environmental matters which we believe are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and economic conditions. We principally manage our exposure to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of our core business activities. We manage economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of our debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, we enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. Our derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of our known or expected cash receipts and our known or expected cash payments principally related to our investments and borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for our making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated, and that qualify, as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with certain variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives recognized directly in earnings was not material. A floor feature on the interest rate of our hedged debt that was not included on the associated interest rate swap caused this ineffectiveness.
Amounts reported in AOCI related to these derivatives will be reclassified to Interest Expense, Net as interest payments are made on the variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the estimated additional amount that will be reclassified from Other Comprehensive Loss to Interest Expense, Net is not material.
The following is a summary of our interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and includes an interest rate swap that we entered into in October 2016 with a notional amount of $255 million that became effective July 1, 2017 (notional amount in thousands):
Count | Notional Amount | Fixed LIBOR | Maturity Date | |||
4 | $642,000 | 1.2% - 1.5% | 2019 - 2023 |
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
We have agreements with our derivative counterparties that contain provisions where, if we either default or are capable of being declared in default on any of our indebtedness, we could also be declared to be in default on our derivative obligations. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of our derivatives excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had not posted any collateral related to these agreements.
11
9. EQUITY
On May 9, 2017, our board of directors reaffirmed its estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.20 based substantially on the estimated market value of our portfolio of real estate properties as of March 31, 2017. We engaged a third party valuation firm to provide a calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock as of March 31, 2017, which reflected certain balance sheet assets and liabilities as of that date.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan—We have adopted a DRIP that allows stockholders to invest distributions in additional shares of our common stock. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, shares were issued under the DRIP at a price of $10.20 per share. In connection with the PELP transaction (see Note 3), the DRIP was suspended during May 2017; therefore, all DRIP participants received their May distribution, which was payable in June, in cash rather than in stock. The DRIP plan resumed in June 2017, with distributions payable in July 2017.
Share Repurchase Program—Our share repurchase program (“SRP”) provides an opportunity for stockholders to have shares of common stock repurchased, subject to certain restrictions and limitations. The cash available for repurchases on any particular date will generally be limited to the proceeds from the DRIP during the preceding four fiscal quarters, less amounts already used for repurchases since the beginning of that period. The board of directors reserves the right, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, to reject any request for repurchase. In connection with the PELP transaction, the SRP was suspended during May 2017 and resumed in June 2017.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, repurchase requests surpassed the funding limits under the SRP. Due to the program’s funding limits, no funds will be available for the remainder of 2017. When we are unable to fulfill all repurchase requests in any month, we will honor requests on a pro rata basis to the extent possible. As of June 30, 2017, we had 9.5 million shares of unfulfilled repurchase requests, which will be treated as requests for repurchase during future months until satisfied or withdrawn. We continue to fulfill repurchases sought upon a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability,” or “determination of incompetence” in accordance with the terms of the SRP.
Class B and Operating Partnership Units—The Operating Partnership issues limited partnership units that are designated as Class B units for asset management services provided by PE-NTR. The vesting of the Class B units is contingent upon a market condition and service condition. Once vested, Class B units may be converted into OP units in accordance with the terms of the Operating Partnership’s Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended (the “Partnership Agreement”). OP units may be exchanged at the election of the holder for cash or, at the option of the Operating Partnership, for shares of our common stock, under the terms of exchange rights agreements to be prepared at a future date, provided, however, that the OP units have been outstanding for at least one year. As the form of the redemptions for the OP units is within our control, the OP units outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, are classified as Noncontrolling Interests within permanent equity on our consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, the cumulative distributions that have been paid on these OP units are included in Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests on the consolidated statements of equity.
Below is a summary of our number of outstanding OP units and unvested Class B units as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||
OP units | 2,785 | 2,785 | ||||
Class B units | 2,892 | 2,610 |
10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
We use the two-class method of computing earnings per share (“EPS”), which is an earnings allocation formula that determines EPS for common stock and any participating securities according to dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid). Under the two-class method, basic EPS is computed by dividing the income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average
number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from share equivalent activity.
Class B units and OP units held by limited partners other than us are considered to be participating securities because they contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents and they have the potential to be exchanged for shares of our common stock in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement. The impact of these Class B units and OP units on basic and diluted EPS has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the Class B units and OP units based on dividends declared and the units’ participation rights in undistributed earnings. The effects of the two-class method on basic and diluted EPS were immaterial to the consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
12
Since the OP units are fully vested, they were treated as potentially dilutive in the diluted net (loss) income per share computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. The vesting of the Class B units is contingent upon a market condition and service condition. Since the satisfaction of both conditions was not probable as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Class B units remained unvested and thus were not included in the diluted net (loss) income per share computations. There were 2.9 million and 2.3 million unvested Class B units outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which had no effect on EPS.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the earnings per unit calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share: | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders | $ | (1,193 | ) | $ | 560 | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 2,779 | |||||
Denominator: | |||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted-average shares | 183,126 | 183,514 | 183,178 | 182,880 | |||||||||||
Effect of dilutive OP units | — | 2,785 | — | 2,785 | |||||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted-average shares | 183,126 | 186,299 | 183,178 | 185,665 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share: | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||||
Diluted earnings per common share: | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | 0.01 |
As of June 30, 2017, approximately 2.8 million OP units and 7,400 restricted stock awards were outstanding. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, these securities were anti-dilutive and, as a result, were excluded from the weighted average common shares used to calculate diluted EPS.
11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Economic Dependency—We are dependent on PE-NTR, Phillips Edison & Company Ltd. (the “Property Manager”), and their respective affiliates for certain services that are essential to us, including asset acquisition and disposition decisions, asset management, operating and leasing of our properties, and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that PE-NTR, the Property Manager, and/or their respective affiliates are unable to provide such services, we would be required to find alternative service providers, which could result in higher costs and expenses.
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, PE-NTR owned 176,509 shares of our common stock, or approximately 0.1% of our outstanding common stock issued during our initial public offering period, which closed in February 2014. PE-NTR may not sell any of these shares while serving as our advisor.
Advisory Agreement—Pursuant to the PE-NTR Agreement, PE-NTR is entitled to specified fees for certain services, including managing our day-to-day activities and implementing our investment strategy. PE-NTR manages our day-to-day affairs and our portfolio of real estate investments subject to the board’s supervision. Expenditures are reimbursed to PE-NTR based on amounts incurred on our behalf.
Acquisition Fee—We pay PE-NTR under the PE-NTR Agreement an acquisition fee related to services provided in connection with the selection and purchase or origination of real estate and real estate-related investments. The acquisition fee is equal to 1% of the cost of investments we acquire or originate, including any debt attributable to such investments.
Due Diligence Fee—We reimburse PE-NTR for expenses incurred related to selecting, evaluating, and acquiring assets on our behalf, including certain personnel costs.
Asset Management Fee and Subordinated Participation—The asset management compensation is equal to 1% of the cost of our assets, and is paid 80% in cash and 20% in Class B units of the Operating Partnership. The cash portion is paid on a monthly basis in arrears at the rate of 0.06667% multiplied by the cost of our assets as of the last day of the preceding monthly period.
Within 60 days after the end of each calendar quarter (subject to the approval of our board of directors), we pay an asset management subordinated participation by issuing a number of restricted operating partnership units designated as Class B units to PE-NTR and American Realty Capital II Advisors, LLC (“ARC”), equal to: (i) the product of (x) the cost of our assets
13
multiplied by (y) 0.05% divided by (ii) the most recent primary offering price for a share of our common stock as of the last day of such calendar quarter less any selling commissions and dealer manager fees that would have been payable in connection with that offering.
PE-NTR and ARC are entitled to receive distributions on the Class B units (and OP units converted from previously issued and vested Class B units) at the same rate as distributions are paid to common stockholders. These Class B units will not vest until the economic hurdle is met in conjunction with (i) a termination of the PE-NTR Agreement by our independent directors without cause, (ii) a listing event, or (iii) a liquidity event; provided that PE-NTR serves as our advisor at the time of any of the foregoing events. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Operating Partnership issued 0.3 million Class B units to PE-NTR and ARC under the PE-NTR Agreement for asset management services performed by PE-NTR.
Disposition Fee—We pay PE-NTR for substantial assistance by PE-NTR, or its affiliates, 2% of the contract sales price of each property or other investment sold. The conflicts committee of our board of directors determines whether PE-NTR or its affiliates have provided substantial assistance to us in connection with the sale of an asset. Substantial assistance in connection with the sale of a property includes preparation of an investment package for the property (including an investment analysis, rent rolls, tenant information regarding credit, a property title report, an environmental report, a structural report, and exhibits) or such other substantial services performed by PE-NTR or its affiliates in connection with a sale. However, if we sold an asset to an affiliate, our organizational documents would prohibit us from paying a disposition fee to PE-NTR or its affiliates.
General and Administrative Expenses—As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we owed PE-NTR and their affiliates approximately $154,000 and $43,000, respectively, for general and administrative expenses paid on our behalf.
Summarized below are the fees earned by and the expenses reimbursable to PE-NTR and ARC, except for unpaid general and administrative expenses, which we disclose above, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and any related amounts unpaid as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Unpaid Amount as of | |||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition fees(1) | $ | 902 | $ | 940 | $ | 1,050 | $ | 940 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
Due diligence fees(1) | 183 | 155 | 213 | 155 | 78 | 29 | |||||||||||||||||
Asset management fees(2) | 5,228 | 4,711 | 10,317 | 9,330 | 1,766 | 1,687 | |||||||||||||||||
OP units distribution(3) | 465 | 464 | 925 | 928 | 158 | 158 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B units distribution(4) | 473 | 382 | 911 | 736 | 155 | 148 | |||||||||||||||||
Disposition fees | 19 | — | 19 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 7,270 | $ | 6,652 | $ | 13,435 | $ | 12,089 | $ | 2,157 | $ | 2,022 |
(1) | Prior to January 1, 2017, acquisition and due diligence fees were recorded on our consolidated statements of operations. The majority of these costs are now capitalized and allocated to the related investment in real estate assets on the consolidated balance sheet based on the acquisition-date fair values of the respective assets and liability acquired. |
(2) | Asset management fees are presented in General and Administrative on the consolidated statements of operations. |
(3) | The distributions paid to holders of OP units are presented as Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests on the consolidated statements of equity. |
(4) | The distributions paid to holders of unvested Class B units are presented in General and Administrative on the consolidated statements of operations. |
Property Manager—All of our real properties are managed and leased by the Property Manager. The Property Manager is wholly owned by our Phillips Edison sponsor. The Property Manager also manages real properties owned by Phillips Edison affiliates and other third parties.
Property Management Fee—We pay to the Property Manager a monthly property management fee of 4% of the monthly gross cash receipts from the properties it manages.
Leasing Commissions—In addition to the property management fee, if the Property Manager provides leasing services with respect to a property, we pay the Property Manager leasing fees in an amount equal to the leasing fees charged by unaffiliated persons rendering comparable services based on national market rates. The Property Manager shall be paid a leasing fee in connection with a tenant’s exercise of an option to extend an existing lease, and the leasing fees payable to the Property Manager may be increased by up to 50% in the event that the Property Manager engages a co-broker to lease a particular vacancy.
Construction Management Fee—If we engage the Property Manager to provide construction management services with respect to a particular property, we pay a construction management fee in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered to similar projects in the geographic market of the property.
14
Expenses and Reimbursements—The Property Manager hires, directs, and establishes policies for employees who have direct responsibility for the operations of each real property it manages, which may include, but is not limited to, on-site managers and building and maintenance personnel. Certain employees of the Property Manager may be employed on a part-time basis and may also be employed by PE-NTR or certain of its affiliates. The Property Manager also directs the purchase of equipment and supplies and supervises all maintenance activity. We reimburse the costs and expenses incurred by the Property Manager on our behalf, including employee compensation, legal, travel, and other out-of-pocket expenses that are directly related to the management of specific properties and corporate matters, as well as fees and expenses of third-party accountants.
Summarized below are the fees earned by and the expenses reimbursable to the Property Manager for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and any related amounts unpaid as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Unpaid Amount as of | |||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property management fees(1) | $ | 2,683 | $ | 2,572 | $ | 5,269 | $ | 4,999 | $ | 857 | $ | 840 | |||||||||||
Leasing commissions(2) | 2,077 | 1,547 | 4,400 | 3,742 | 809 | 705 | |||||||||||||||||
Construction management fees(2) | 380 | 254 | 684 | 413 | 163 | 165 | |||||||||||||||||
Other fees and reimbursements(3) | 1,912 | 1,406 | 3,621 | 2,576 | 1,015 | 796 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 7,052 | $ | 5,779 | $ | 13,974 | $ | 11,730 | $ | 2,844 | $ | 2,506 |
(1) | The property management fees are included in Property Operating on the consolidated statements of operations. |
(2) | Leasing commissions paid for leases with terms less than one year are expensed immediately and included in Depreciation and Amortization on the consolidated statements of operations. Leasing commissions paid for leases with terms greater than one year, and construction management fees, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related leases or assets. |
(3) | Other fees and reimbursements are included in Property Operating, General and Administrative, and Transaction Expenses on the consolidated statements of operations based on the nature of the expense. |
12. OPERATING LEASES
The terms and expirations of our operating leases with our tenants vary. The lease agreements frequently contain options to extend the terms of leases and other terms and conditions as negotiated. We retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to tenants.
Approximate future rental income to be received under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of June 30, 2017, assuming no new or renegotiated leases or option extensions on lease agreements, was as follows (in thousands):
Year | Amount | ||
Remaining 2017 | $ | 103,281 | |
2018 | 195,464 | ||
2019 | 171,809 | ||
2020 | 149,559 | ||
2021 | 124,903 | ||
2022 and thereafter | 412,963 | ||
Total | $ | 1,157,979 |
No single tenant comprised 10% or more of our aggregate annualized base rent as of June 30, 2017.
15
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Distributions to Stockholders
Distributions equal to a daily amount of $0.00183562 per share of common stock outstanding were paid subsequent to June 30, 2017, to the stockholders of record from June 1, 2017, through July 31, 2017, as follows (in thousands):
Distribution Period | Date Distribution Paid | Gross Amount of Distribution Paid | Distribution Reinvested through the DRIP | Net Cash Distribution | ||||||||||
June 1, 2017, through June 30, 2017 | 7/3/2017 | $ | 10,091 | $ | 4,383 | $ | 5,708 | |||||||
July 1, 2017, through July 31, 2017 | 8/1/2017 | 10,385 | 4,468 | 5,917 |
In August 2017 our board of directors authorized distributions to the stockholders of record at the close of business each day in the period commencing September 1, 2017, through November 30, 2017, equal to a daily amount of $0.00183562 per share of common stock.
16
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc. (“we,” the “Company,” “our,” or “us”) other than historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in those acts. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” or other similar words. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this report is filed with the SEC. We make no representations or warranties (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual conditions, our ability to accurately anticipate results expressed in such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, make distributions to stockholders, and maintain the value of our real estate properties, may be significantly hindered.
See Item 1A. Risk Factors, in Part II of this Form 10-Q, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in Part I of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 9, 2017, and in the Proxy Statement, for a discussion of some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all of the risks and uncertainties, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements are disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors, in Part II, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of this Form 10-Q, and in the Proxy Statement.
Overview
Organization
Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc. is a public non-traded real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that invests in retail real estate properties. Our primary focus is on grocery-anchored neighborhood and community shopping centers that meet the day-to-day needs of residents in the surrounding trade areas.
On May 18, 2017, we entered into the PELP transaction. For a more detailed discussion, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
Portfolio
Below are statistical highlights of our portfolio:
Property Acquisitions During the | ||||||
Total Portfolio as of | Six Months Ended | |||||
June 30, 2017 | June 30, 2017 | |||||
Number of properties | 158 | 5 | ||||
Number of states | 28 | 3 | ||||
Total square feet (in thousands) | 17,249 | 501 | ||||
Leased % of rentable square feet | 95.9 | % | 89.0 | % | ||
Average remaining lease term (in years)(1) | 5.4 | 7.1 |
(1) | As of June 30, 2017. The average remaining lease term in years excludes future options to extend the term of the lease. |
17
Lease Expirations
The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations after June 30, 2017, for each of the next ten years and thereafter for our 158 shopping centers. The table shows the leased square feet and annualized base rent (“ABR”) represented by the applicable lease expirations (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Year | Number of Leases Expiring | Leased Square Feet Expiring | % of Leased Square Feet Expiring | ABR(1) | % of Total Portfolio ABR | |||||||||||
Remaining 2017(2) | 166 | 410 | 2.5 | % | $ | 5,848 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
2018 | 352 | 1,546 | 9.3 | % | 20,596 | 9.9 | % | |||||||||
2019 | 419 | 2,031 | 12.3 | % | 26,978 | 13.0 | % | |||||||||
2020 | 329 | 1,791 | 10.8 | % | 23,147 | 11.1 | % | |||||||||
2021 | 350 | 2,068 | 12.5 | % | 24,689 | 11.9 | % | |||||||||
2022 | 256 | 1,962 | 11.9 | % | 21,260 | 10.2 | % | |||||||||
2023 | 115 | 1,589 | 9.6 | % | 19,945 | 9.6 | % | |||||||||
2024 | 141 | 1,258 | 7.6 | % | 13,304 | 6.4 | % | |||||||||
2025 | 117 | 702 | 4.2 | % | 11,316 | 5.4 | % | |||||||||
2026 | 120 | 979 | 5.9 | % | 14,431 | 6.9 | % | |||||||||
Thereafter | 192 | 2,201 | 13.4 | % | 26,417 | 12.8 | % | |||||||||
2,557 | 16,537 | 100.0 | % | $ | 207,931 | 100.0 | % |
(1) | We calculate ABR as monthly contractual rent as of June 30, 2017, multiplied by 12 months. |
(2) | Subsequent to June 30, 2017, we renewed 35 leases, which accounts for 225,125 total square feet and total ABR of $2.4 million. |
Portfolio Tenancy
The following table presents the composition of our portfolio by tenant type as of June 30, 2017 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Tenant Type | ABR | % of ABR | Leased Square Feet | % of Leased Square Feet | ||||||||||
Grocery anchor | $ | 83,582 | 40.2 | % | $ | 8,750 | 52.9 | % | ||||||
National and regional(1) | 79,147 | 38.1 | % | 5,385 | 32.6 | % | ||||||||
Local | 45,202 | 21.7 | % | 2,402 | 14.5 | % | ||||||||
$ | 207,931 | 100.0 | % | $ | 16,537 | 100.0 | % |
(1) | We define national tenants as those that operate in at least three states. Regional tenants are defined as those that have at least three locations. |
The following table presents the composition of our portfolio by tenant industry as of June 30, 2017 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Tenant Industry | ABR | % of ABR | Leased Square Feet | % of Leased Square Feet | ||||||||||
Grocery | $ | 83,582 | 40.2 | % | $ | 8,750 | 52.9 | % | ||||||
Service | 48,154 | 23.2 | % | 2,508 | 15.2 | % | ||||||||
Retail | 46,052 | 22.1 | % | 3,870 | 23.4 | % | ||||||||
Restaurants | 30,143 | 14.5 | % | 1,409 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||
$ | 207,931 | 100.0 | % | $ | 16,537 | 100.0 | % |
18
The following table presents our grocery anchor tenants, grouped according to parent company, by leased square feet as of June 30, 2017 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Tenant | ABR | % of ABR | Leased Square Feet | % of Leased Square Feet | Number of Locations(1) | |||||||||||
Kroger | $ | 18,270 | 8.8 | % | 2,298 | 13.9 | % | 40 | ||||||||
Publix Super Markets | 15,514 | 7.5 | % | 1,503 | 9.1 | % | 32 | |||||||||
Ahold Delhaize | 8,383 | 4.0 | % | 555 | 3.3 | % | 10 | |||||||||
Albertsons Companies | 7,744 | 3.7 | % | 756 | 4.6 | % | 13 | |||||||||
Giant Eagle | 5,435 | 2.6 | % | 560 | 3.4 | % | 7 | |||||||||
Walmart | 5,197 | 2.5 | % | 1,121 | 6.8 | % | 9 | |||||||||
Raley's Supermarkets | 3,422 | 1.6 | % | 193 | 1.2 | % | 3 | |||||||||
SuperValu | 2,382 | 1.1 | % | 273 | 1.7 | % | 4 | |||||||||
Sprouts Farmers Market | 2,281 | 1.1 | % | 195 | 1.2 | % | 6 | |||||||||
Southeastern Grocers | 1,545 | 0.7 | % | 147 | 0.9 | % | 3 | |||||||||
Schnuck Markets | 1,459 | 0.7 | % | 121 | 0.7 | % | 2 | |||||||||
Coborn's | 1,388 | 0.7 | % | 108 | 0.7 | % | 2 | |||||||||
BJ’s Wholesale Club | 1,223 | 0.6 | % | 115 | 0.7 | % | 1 | |||||||||
H.E. Butt Grocery Company | 1,210 | 0.6 | % | 81 | 0.5 | % | 1 | |||||||||
Big Y Foods | 1,091 | 0.5 | % | 65 | 0.4 | % | 1 | |||||||||
PAQ | 1,046 | 0.5 | % | 59 | 0.3 | % | 1 | |||||||||
Trader Joe's | 934 | 0.5 | % | 55 | 0.3 | % | 4 | |||||||||
McKeever Enterprises | 844 | 0.4 | % | 68 | 0.4 | % | 1 | |||||||||
Save Mart Supermarkets | 843 | 0.4 | % | 102 | 0.6 | % | 2 | |||||||||
The Fresh Market | 841 | 0.4 | % | 59 | 0.3 | % | 3 | |||||||||
Pete's Fresh Market | 579 | 0.3 | % | 72 | 0.4 | % | 1 | |||||||||
U R M Stores | 574 | 0.3 | % | 51 | 0.3 | % | 1 | |||||||||
Hy-Vee Food Stores | 527 | 0.3 | % | 127 | 0.8 | % | 2 | |||||||||
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market | 450 | 0.2 | % | 30 | 0.2 | % | 1 | |||||||||
Marcs | 400 | 0.2 | % | 36 | 0.2 | % | 1 | |||||||||
$ | 83,582 | 40.2 | % | 8,750 | 52.9 | % | 151 |
(1) | Number of locations excludes (a) auxiliary leases with grocery anchors such as fuel stations, pharmacies, and liquor stores, (b) four locations where we do not own the portion of the shopping center that contains the grocery anchor, and (c) four locations that have non-grocery anchors. Number of locations also includes one shopping center that has two grocery anchors. |
19
Results of Operations
Summary of Operating Activities for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
Favorable (Unfavorable) Change | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | |||||||||||
Operating Data: | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 69,851 | $ | 63,053 | $ | 6,798 | 10.8 | % | |||||||
Property operating expenses | (10,297 | ) | (9,657 | ) | (640 | ) | (6.6 | )% | |||||||
Real estate tax expenses | (10,155 | ) | (9,230 | ) | (925 | ) | (10.0 | )% | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | (8,896 | ) | (8,461 | ) | (435 | ) | (5.1 | )% | |||||||
Acquisition expenses | (313 | ) | (1,502 | ) | 1,189 | NM | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (28,207 | ) | (25,977 | ) | (2,230 | ) | (8.6 | )% | |||||||
Interest expense, net | (9,501 | ) | (7,601 | ) | (1,900 | ) | (25.0 | )% | |||||||
Transaction expenses | (4,383 | ) | — | (4,383 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 680 | (42 | ) | 722 | NM | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income | (1,221 | ) | 583 | (1,804 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 28 | (23 | ) | 51 | NM | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders | $ | (1,193 | ) | $ | 560 | $ | (1,753 | ) | NM | ||||||
Net (loss) income per share—basic and diluted | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.01 | ) |
Below are explanations of the significant fluctuations in the results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
Total revenues—Of the $6.8 million increase in total revenues, $6.7 million is attributed to owning nine more properties as of June 30, 2017, than the comparable 2016 period. The remaining increase was the result of a $0.1 million increase among same-center properties, which are the 137 properties that were owned and operational for the entire portion of both comparable reporting periods. There are nine properties being repositioned in the market and such repositioning is expected to have a significant impact on property operating income. As such, these properties have been classified as redevelopment and have been excluded from our same-center pool. The increase in same-center revenue was due to a $0.6 million increase in rental income, offset by a $0.4 million decrease in tenant recovery income. The increase in same-center rental income was driven by a $0.26 increase in minimum rent per square foot and a 0.3% increase in occupancy since June 30, 2016. The decrease in tenant recovery income primarily resulted from a decrease in property maintenance recoveries and metered utility recoveries, as our expenses were lower for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016.
Property operating expenses—These expenses include (i) operating and maintenance expense, which consists of property-related costs including repairs and maintenance costs, landscaping, snow removal, utilities, property insurance costs, security, and various other property-related expenses; (ii) bad debt expense; and (iii) property management fees and expenses. The $0.6 million increase in property operating expenses consisted of a $1.2 million increase related to owning nine more properties as of June 30, 2017, than the comparable 2016 period, offset by a $0.5 million decrease in property operating expenses among same-center properties. This decrease was attributed to a reduction in allowance for doubtful accounts that resulted from improved collections, as well as a decrease in insurance costs from obtaining more favorable rates.
Real estate tax expenses—The $0.9 million increase in real estate tax expenses was primarily due to having more properties in our portfolio as of June 30, 2017, than the comparable 2016 period.
General and administrative expenses—The $0.4 million increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to additional asset management fees related to the additional properties acquired after June 30, 2016.
Acquisition expenses—The $1.2 million decrease in acquisition expenses was attributed to the implementation of ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, which requires us to capitalize most acquisition-related costs. For a more detailed discussion of this adoption, see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
Depreciation and amortization—The $2.2 million increase in depreciation and amortization expenses included a $2.9 million increase related to owning more properties at June 30, 2017, than at June 30, 2016. This was offset by a $0.4 million decrease due to the disposition of a property in December 2016, and a $0.3 million decrease that was primarily attributed to certain intangible lease assets becoming fully amortized.
20
Interest expense, net—The $1.9 million increase in interest expense stemmed from additional borrowings subsequent to June 30, 2016, offset by a decrease that resulted from refinancing certain mortgages.
Transaction expenses—The $4.4 million increase in transaction expenses resulted from costs incurred in connection with the PELP transaction (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Other income (expense), net—Other income increased $0.7 million primarily due to a gain on the sale of land at one of our properties.
Summary of Operating Activities for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
Favorable (Unfavorable) Change | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | |||||||||||
Operating Data: | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 138,154 | $ | 126,135 | $ | 12,019 | 9.5 | % | |||||||
Property operating expenses | (21,729 | ) | (19,948 | ) | (1,781 | ) | (8.9 | )% | |||||||
Real estate tax expenses | (20,413 | ) | (18,641 | ) | (1,772 | ) | (9.5 | )% | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | (16,726 | ) | (16,014 | ) | (712 | ) | (4.4 | )% | |||||||
Acquisition expenses | (264 | ) | (1,522 | ) | 1,258 | NM | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (55,831 | ) | (51,683 | ) | (4,148 | ) | (8.0 | )% | |||||||
Interest expense, net | (17,891 | ) | (15,333 | ) | (2,558 | ) | (16.7 | )% | |||||||
Transaction expenses | (6,023 | ) | — | (6,023 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 636 | (158 | ) | 794 | NM | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income | (87 | ) | 2,836 | (2,923 | ) | (103.1 | )% | ||||||||
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | (57 | ) | 57 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 2,779 | $ | (2,866 | ) | (103.1 | )% | |||||
Net (loss) income per share—basic | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.02 | ) | |||||||
Net (loss) income per share—diluted | (0.00 | ) | 0.01 | (0.01 | ) |
Below are explanations of the significant fluctuations in the results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
Total revenues—Of the $12.0 million increase in total revenues, $11.2 million was related to owning nine more properties as of June 30, 2017, than the comparable 2016 period, and the remaining $0.8 million increase was attributed to same-center properties. The increase in same-center revenue was due to a $1.7 million increase in rental income, offset by a $0.8 million decrease in tenant recovery income. The increase in same-center rental income was driven by a $0.26 increase in minimum rent per square foot and a 0.3% increase in occupancy since June 30, 2016. The decrease in tenant recovery income stemmed from a decrease in real estate tax, property maintenance, and metered utility recoveries, as our expenses were lower for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016.
Property operating expenses—The $1.8 million increase in property operating expenses was primarily related to owning nine more properties as of June 30, 2017, than the comparable 2016 period.
Real estate tax expenses—The $1.8 million increase in real estate tax expenses was comprised of a $2.1 million increase due to having more properties in our portfolio as of June 30, 2017, than the comparable 2016 period, offset by a $0.3 million decrease attributed to same-center properties.
Acquisition expenses—The $1.3 million decrease in acquisition expenses was attributed to the implementation of ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, which requires us to capitalize most acquisition-related costs. For a more detailed discussion of this adoption, see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
Depreciation and amortization—The $4.1 million increase in depreciation and amortization expenses included a $5.5 million increase related to owning more properties at June 30, 2017, than at June 30, 2016. This was offset by a $0.8 million decrease due to the disposition of a property in December 2016, as well as a $0.7 million decrease that was primarily attributed to certain intangible lease assets becoming fully amortized.
Interest expense, net—The $2.6 million increase in interest expense stemmed from additional borrowings subsequent to June 30, 2016, offset by a decrease that resulted from refinancing certain mortgages.
21
Transaction expenses—The $6.0 million increase in transaction expenses resulted from costs incurred in connection with the PELP transaction (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Other income (expense), net—Other income increased $0.8 million primarily due to gains from the sale of land at two of our properties.
Leasing Activity
The average rent per square foot and cost of executing leases fluctuates based on the tenant mix, size of the space, and lease term. Leases with national and regional tenants generally require a higher cost per square foot than those with local tenants. However, such tenants will also execute leases for a longer term. As we continue to attract more of these national and regional tenants, our costs to lease may increase.
Below is a summary of leasing activity for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
Total Deals | Inline Deals(1) | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
New leases: | ||||||||||||||||
Number of leases | 45 | 40 | 44 | 40 | ||||||||||||
Square footage (in thousands) | 108 | 105 | 94 | 105 | ||||||||||||
First-year base rental revenue (in thousands) | $ | 2,028 | $ | 1,700 | $ | 1,937 | $ | 1,700 | ||||||||
Average rent per square foot (“PSF”) | $ | 18.79 | $ | 16.18 | $ | 20.57 | $ | 16.18 | ||||||||
Average cost PSF of executing new leases(2)(3) | $ | 34.06 | $ | 27.95 | $ | 35.02 | $ | 27.95 | ||||||||
Weighted average lease term (in years) | 8.3 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 7.2 | ||||||||||||
Renewals and options: | ||||||||||||||||
Number of leases | 85 | 82 | 80 | 78 | ||||||||||||
Square footage (in thousands) | 380 | 247 | 157 | 150 | ||||||||||||
First-year base rental revenue (in thousands) | $ | 5,356 | $ | 4,157 | $ | 3,602 | $ | 3,384 | ||||||||
Average rent PSF | $ | 14.10 | $ | 16.80 | $ | 22.88 | $ | 22.60 | ||||||||
Average rent PSF prior to renewals | $ | 13.09 | $ | 15.07 | $ | 20.51 | $ | 19.95 | ||||||||
Percentage increase in average rent PSF | 7.7 | % | 11.5 | % | 11.5 | % | 13.3 | % | ||||||||
Average cost PSF of executing renewals and options(2)(3) | $ | 2.83 | $ | 3.57 | $ | 5.16 | $ | 5.07 | ||||||||
Weighted average lease term (in years) | 5.1 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
Portfolio retention rate(4) | 91.0 | % | 92.3 | % | 90.2 | % | 85.6 | % |
(1) | We consider an inline deal to be a lease for less than 10,000 square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”). |
(2) | The cost of executing new leases, renewals, and options includes leasing commissions, tenant improvement costs, and tenant concessions. |
(3) | The costs associated with landlord improvements are excluded for repositioning and redevelopment projects. |
(4) | The portfolio retention rate is calculated by dividing (a) total square feet of retained tenants with current period lease expirations by (b) the square feet of leases expiring during the period. |
22
Below is a summary of leasing activity for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
Total Deals | Inline Deals | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
New leases: | ||||||||||||||||
Number of leases | 92 | 89 | 89 | 86 | ||||||||||||
Square footage (in thousands) | 237 | 328 | 195 | 220 | ||||||||||||
First-year base rental revenue (in thousands) | $ | 4,183 | $ | 4,431 | $ | 3,854 | $ | 3,589 | ||||||||
Average rent PSF | $ | 17.62 | $ | 13.53 | $ | 19.73 | $ | 16.35 | ||||||||
Average cost PSF of executing new leases | $ | 31.94 | $ | 26.50 | $ | 34.53 | $ | 32.99 | ||||||||
Weighted average lease term (in years) | 8.2 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.3 | ||||||||||||
Renewals and options: | ||||||||||||||||
Number of leases | 170 | 145 | 157 | 136 | ||||||||||||
Square footage (in thousands) | 806 | 757 | 327 | 267 | ||||||||||||
First-year base rental revenue (in thousands) | $ | 12,467 | $ | 8,418 | $ | 7,662 | $ | 5,690 | ||||||||
Average rent PSF | $ | 15.47 | $ | 11.11 | $ | 23.46 | $ | 21.29 | ||||||||
Average rent PSF prior to renewals | $ | 14.22 | $ | 10.04 | $ | 20.95 | $ | 18.67 | ||||||||
Percentage increase in average rent PSF | 8.8 | % | 10.7 | % | 12.0 | % | 14.0 | % | ||||||||
Average cost PSF of executing renewals and options | $ | 3.02 | $ | 2.76 | $ | 5.19 | $ | 4.79 | ||||||||
Weighted average lease term (in years) | 5.1 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 5.5 | ||||||||||||
Portfolio retention rate | 93.4 | % | 90.1 | % | 89.0 | % | 82.3 | % |
Non-GAAP Measures
Same-Center Net Operating Income
We present Same-Center Net Operating Income (“Same-Center NOI”) as a supplemental measure of our performance. We define Net Operating Income (“NOI”) as total operating revenues, adjusted to exclude lease buy-out income and non-cash revenue items, less property operating expenses and real estate taxes. Same-Center NOI represents the NOI for the 137 properties that were owned and operational for the entire portion of both comparable reporting periods, except for the nine properties we currently classify as redevelopment. While there is judgment surrounding changes in designations, once a redevelopment property has stabilized, it is typically moved to the same-center pool the following year.
We believe that NOI and Same-Center NOI provide useful information to our investors about our financial and operating performance because each provides a performance measure of the revenues and expenses directly involved in owning and operating real estate assets and provides a perspective not immediately apparent from net income (loss). Because Same-Center NOI excludes the change in NOI from properties acquired after December 31, 2015, and those considered redevelopment properties, it highlights operating trends such as occupancy levels, rental rates, and operating costs on properties that were operational for both comparable periods. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating Same-Center NOI, and accordingly, our Same-Center NOI may not be comparable to other REITs.
Same-Center NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of our financial performance since it does not reflect the operations of our entire portfolio, nor does it reflect the impact of general and administrative expenses, acquisition expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, other income, or the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties that could materially impact our results from operations.
23
The table below is a comparison of Same-Center NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, to the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | $ Change | % Change | 2017 | 2016 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income(1) | $ | 42,304 | $ | 41,507 | $ | 797 | $ | 84,967 | $ | 82,867 | $ | 2,100 | |||||||||||||||||
Tenant recovery income | 13,665 | 14,095 | (430 | ) | 27,716 | 28,563 | (847 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other property income | 137 | 216 | (79 | ) | 341 | 367 | (26 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 56,106 | 55,818 | 288 | 0.5 | % | 113,024 | 111,797 | 1,227 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 8,437 | 8,680 | (243 | ) | 17,732 | 17,860 | (128 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 8,291 | 8,309 | (18 | ) | 16,551 | 16,865 | (314 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 16,728 | 16,989 | (261 | ) | (1.5 | )% | 34,283 | 34,725 | (442 | ) | (1.3 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Total Same-Center NOI | $ | 39,378 | $ | 38,829 | $ | 549 | 1.4 | % | $ | 78,741 | $ | 77,072 | $ | 1,669 | 2.2 | % |
(1) | Excludes straight-line rental income, net amortization of above- and below-market leases, and lease buyout income. |
Below is a reconciliation of net (loss) income to NOI and Same-Center NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016(1) | 2017 | 2016(1) | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (1,221 | ) | $ | 583 | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 2,836 | |||||
Adjusted to exclude: | |||||||||||||||
Straight-line rental income | (1,451 | ) | (826 | ) | (1,943 | ) | (1,725 | ) | |||||||
Net amortization of above- and below-market leases | (357 | ) | (310 | ) | (686 | ) | (582 | ) | |||||||
Lease buyout income | (1,085 | ) | (169 | ) | (1,112 | ) | (534 | ) | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | 8,896 | 8,461 | 16,726 | 16,014 | |||||||||||
Acquisition expenses | 313 | 1,502 | 264 | 1,522 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 28,207 | 25,977 | 55,831 | 51,683 | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net | 9,501 | 7,601 | 17,891 | 15,333 | |||||||||||
Transaction expenses | 4,383 | — | 6,023 | — | |||||||||||
Other | (680 | ) | 42 | (636 | ) | 158 | |||||||||
NOI | 46,506 | 42,861 | 92,271 | 84,705 | |||||||||||
Less: NOI from centers excluded from Same-Center | (7,128 | ) | (4,032 | ) | (13,530 | ) | (7,633 | ) | |||||||
Total Same-Center NOI | $ | 39,378 | $ | 38,829 | $ | 78,741 | $ | 77,072 |
(1) | Certain prior period amounts have been restated to conform with current year presentation. |
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely recognized as a measure of REIT operating performance. We use FFO as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) to be net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable real estate property (including deemed sales and settlements of pre-existing relationships), plus depreciation and amortization on real estate assets and impairment charges, and after related adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures, and noncontrolling interests. We believe that FFO is helpful to our investors and our management as a measure of operating performance because, when compared year over year, it reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which are not immediately apparent from net income (loss).
Since the definition of FFO was promulgated by NAREIT, GAAP has expanded to include several new accounting pronouncements, such that management and many investors and analysts have considered the presentation of FFO alone to be insufficient. Accordingly, in addition to FFO, we use modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), which, as defined by us, excludes from FFO the following items:
• | acquisition and transaction expenses; |
24
• | straight-line rent amounts, both income and expense; |
• | amortization of above- or below-market intangible lease assets and liabilities; |
• | amortization of discounts and premiums on debt investments; |
• | gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt; |
• | gains or losses on the extinguishment of derivatives, except where the trading of such instruments is a fundamental attribute of our operations; |
• | gains or losses related to fair value adjustments for derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting; and |
• | adjustments related to the above items for joint ventures and noncontrolling interests and unconsolidated entities in the application of equity accounting. |
We believe that MFFO is helpful in assisting management and investors with the assessment of the sustainability of operating performance in future periods because MFFO excludes acquisition expenses that affect operations only in the period in which the property is acquired. Thus, MFFO provides helpful information relevant to evaluating our operating performance in periods in which there is no acquisition activity.
Many of the adjustments in arriving at MFFO are not applicable to us. Nevertheless, as explained below, management’s evaluation of our operating performance may also exclude items considered in the calculation of MFFO based on the following economic considerations.
• | Adjustments for straight-line rents and amortization of discounts and premiums on debt investments—GAAP requires rental receipts and discounts and premiums on debt investments to be recognized using various systematic methodologies. This may result in income recognition that could be significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting for these items, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance. The adjustment to MFFO for straight-line rents, in particular, is made to reflect rent and lease payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis. |
• | Adjustments for amortization of above- or below-market intangible lease assets—Similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate-related assets that are excluded from FFO, GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of intangibles diminishes ratably over the lease term and should be recognized in revenue. Since real estate values and market lease rates in the aggregate have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, and the intangible value is not adjusted to reflect these changes, management believes that by excluding these charges, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate. |
• | Gains or losses related to fair value adjustments for derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting—This item relates to a fair value adjustment, which is based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions and specific performance of the holding, which may not be directly attributable to current operating performance. As these gains or losses relate to underlying long-term assets and liabilities, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information by focusing on the changes in core operating fundamentals rather than changes that may reflect anticipated, but unknown, gains or losses. |
• | Adjustment for gains or losses related to early extinguishment of derivatives and debt instruments—These adjustments are not related to continuing operations. By excluding these items, management believes that MFFO provides supplemental information related to sustainable operations that will be more comparable between other reporting periods and to other real estate operators. |
Neither FFO nor MFFO should be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations under GAAP, nor as an indication of our liquidity, nor is either of these measures indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to fund distributions. MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate our business plan in the manner currently contemplated.
Accordingly, FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements. FFO and MFFO should not be viewed as more prominent measures of performance than our net income (loss) or cash flows from operations prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our FFO and MFFO, as presented, may not be comparable to amounts calculated by other REITs.
25
The following section presents our calculation of FFO and MFFO and provides additional information related to our operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||
Calculation of FFO | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders | $ | (1,193 | ) | $ | 560 | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 2,779 | |||||
Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets | 28,207 | 25,977 | 55,831 | 51,683 | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | (414 | ) | (387 | ) | (834 | ) | (774 | ) | |||||||
FFO attributable to common stockholders | $ | 26,600 | $ | 26,150 | $ | 54,910 | $ | 53,688 | |||||||
Calculation of MFFO | |||||||||||||||
FFO | $ | 26,600 | $ | 26,150 | $ | 54,910 | $ | 53,688 | |||||||
Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition expenses | 313 | 1,502 | 264 | 1,522 | |||||||||||
Net amortization of above- and below-market leases | (357 | ) | (310 | ) | (686 | ) | (582 | ) | |||||||
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt | — | 56 | (524 | ) | 105 | ||||||||||
Straight-line rental income | (1,451 | ) | (826 | ) | (1,943 | ) | (1,725 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of market debt adjustment | (293 | ) | (673 | ) | (571 | ) | (1,346 | ) | |||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives | (126 | ) | (21 | ) | (124 | ) | 32 | ||||||||
Transaction expenses | 4,383 | — | 6,023 | — | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | (45 | ) | 17 | (37 | ) | 43 | |||||||||
MFFO attributable to common stockholders | $ | 29,024 | $ | 25,895 | $ | 57,312 | $ | 51,737 | |||||||
FFO/MFFO per share: | |||||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic | 183,126 | 183,514 | 183,178 | 182,880 | |||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted(1) | 185,916 | 186,299 | 185,969 | 185,665 | |||||||||||
FFO per share - basic | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.29 | |||||||
FFO per share - diluted | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.29 | |||||||
MFFO per share - basic and diluted | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.28 |
(1) | OP units and restricted stock awards were dilutive to FFO/MFFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, and, accordingly, were included in the weighted average common shares used to calculate diluted FFO/MFFO per share. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our principal cash demands, aside from standard operating expenses, are for investments in real estate, capital expenditures, repurchases of common stock, distributions to stockholders, and principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness. We intend to use our cash on hand, operating cash flows, and proceeds from debt financings, including borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, as our primary sources of immediate and long-term liquidity. On May 18, 2017, we entered into the PELP transaction, which is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2017. Under the terms of the agreement, we will pay PELP approximately $50.0 million in cash (refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information). We believe our sources of cash will provide adequate liquidity to fund our obligations, including the cash needed for the PELP transaction.
As of June 30, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5.4 million, a net cash decrease of $2.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Operating Activities
Our net cash provided by operating activities consists primarily of cash inflows from tenant rental and recovery payments and cash outflows for property operating expenses, real estate taxes, general and administrative expenses, and interest payments.
Our cash flows from operating activities were $49.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $57.0 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable, as well as an increase in prepaid insurance payments as a result of the timing of our policy renewals in the current year.
26
Investing Activities
Net cash flows from investing activities are affected by the nature, timing, and extent of improvements to, as well as acquisitions and dispositions of, real estate and real estate-related assets, as we continue to evaluate the market for available properties and may acquire properties when we believe strategic opportunities exist.
Our net cash used in investing activities was $49.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $105.0 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease in cash used primarily resulted from the release of $35.9 million from restricted cash due to the completion of a reverse Section 1031 like-kind exchange, which originated from the sale of a property in December 2016.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we acquired five shopping centers for a total cash outlay of $75.8 million. During the same period in 2016, we acquired two shopping centers and additional real estate adjacent to a previously acquired shopping center for a total cash outlay of $94.4 million.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows from financing activities are affected by payments of distributions, share repurchases, principal and other payments associated with our outstanding debt, and borrowings during the period. As our debt obligations mature, we intend to refinance the remaining balance, if possible, or pay off the balances at maturity using proceeds from operations and/or corporate-level debt. Our net cash used in financing activities was $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to net cash flow provided by financing activities of $13.8 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities primarily resulted from increases in share repurchases and distributions, partially offset by increased borrowings and lower payments on outstanding debt.
As of June 30, 2017, our debt to total enterprise value was 38.1%. Debt to total enterprise value is calculated as net debt (total debt, excluding below-market debt adjustments and deferred financing costs, less cash and cash equivalents) as a percentage of enterprise value (equity value, calculated as diluted shares outstanding multiplied by the current estimated value per share of $10.20, plus net debt).
Our debt is subject to certain covenants, as disclosed in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 9, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with the restrictive covenants of our outstanding debt obligations. We expect to continue to meet the requirements of our debt covenants over the short- and long-term. Our debt to total enterprise value and debt covenant compliance as of June 30, 2017, allow us access to future borrowings as needed.
We have access to a revolving credit facility with a capacity of $500 million and a current interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.3%. As of June 30, 2017, $203.0 million was available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility matures in December 2017. In connection with the PELP transaction and associated assumption of debt, we anticipate refinancing this facility prior to maturity. If we do not refinance, we will exercise our option to extend the maturity to 2018.
We offer an SRP that provides a limited opportunity for stockholders to have shares of common stock repurchased, subject to certain restrictions and limitations. For a more detailed discussion of our SRP, see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
Activity related to distributions to our common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, is as follows (in thousands):
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Gross distributions paid | $ | 61,370 | $ | 61,163 | |||
Distributions reinvested through the DRIP | 22,850 | 30,190 | |||||
Net cash distributions | $ | 38,520 | $ | 30,973 | |||
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 2,779 | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 48,957 | $ | 56,955 | |||
FFO(1) | $ | 54,910 | $ | 53,688 |
(1) See Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Non-GAAP Measures - Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations, for the definition of FFO, information regarding why we present FFO, as well as for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to net (loss) income on the consolidated statements of operations.
We paid distributions monthly and expect to continue paying distributions monthly unless our results of operations, our general financial condition, general economic conditions, or other factors, as determined by our board of directors, make it imprudent to do so. The timing and amount of distributions is determined by our board of directors and is influenced in part by our intention to comply with REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.
27
To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must make aggregate annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain, and which does not necessarily equal net income (loss) as calculated in accordance with GAAP). We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the income that we distribute to our stockholders each year due to meeting the REIT qualification requirements. However, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income, property, or net worth and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.
We have not established a minimum distribution level, and our charter does not require that we make distributions to our stockholders.
Critical Accounting Policies
Real Estate Acquisition Accounting—In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This update amends existing guidance in order to clarify when an integrated set of assets and activities is considered a business. We adopted ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, and applied it prospectively. Under this new guidance, most of our real estate acquisition activity will no longer be considered a business combination and will instead be classified as an asset acquisition. As a result, most acquisition-related costs that would have been recorded on our consolidated statements of operations have been capitalized and will be amortized over the life of the related assets.
For a summary of all of our critical accounting policies, refer to our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 9, 2017.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements—Refer to Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements in this report for discussion of the impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We hedge a portion of our exposure to interest rate fluctuations through the utilization of interest rate swaps in order to mitigate the risk of this exposure. We do not intend to enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. Our hedging decisions are determined based upon the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from our currently anticipated hedging strategy. Because we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may be exposed to both credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty will owe us, which creates credit risk for us. If the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, we will owe the counterparty and, therefore, do not have credit risk. We seek to minimize the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.
As of June 30, 2017, we had three interest rate swaps that fixed LIBOR on $387 million of our unsecured term loan facility, and we were party to an interest rate swap that fixed the variable interest rate on $10.9 million of one of our secured mortgage notes at 5.22%. We also entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement to fix the interest rate on $255 million of our unsecured debt, which became effective July 1, 2017. This interest rate swap converts the LIBOR portion of the interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 1.329% through September 2023.
As of June 30, 2017, we had not fixed the interest rate on $565.0 million of our unsecured debt through derivative financial instruments, and as a result, we are subject to the potential impact of rising interest rates, which could negatively impact our profitability and cash flows. The impact on our results of operations of a one-percentage point increase in interest rates on the outstanding balance of our variable-rate debt at June 30, 2017, would result in approximately $5.6 million of additional interest expense annually.
The additional interest expense was determined based on the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost and assumes no changes in our capital structure. As the information presented above includes only those exposures that exist as of June 30, 2017, it does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. Hence, the information represented herein has limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, the hedging strategies at the time, and the related interest rates.
We had no other outstanding interest rate swap agreements as of June 30, 2017.
We do not have any foreign operations, and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.
28
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2017. Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of June 30, 2017.
Internal Control Changes
During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve claims for damages. Many of these matters are covered by insurance, although they may nevertheless be subject to deductibles or retentions. Although the ultimate liability for these matters cannot be determined, based upon information currently available, we believe the ultimate resolution of such claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements, nor are we aware of any such legal proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For a listing of risk factors associated with investing in us, please see Item 1A. Risk Factors in Part I of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 9, 2017, and in the Proxy Statement.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
a) | None. |
b) | Not applicable. |
c) | During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, we repurchased shares as follows (shares in thousands): |
Period | Total Number of Shares Repurchased | Average Price Paid per Share(1) | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan or Program(2) | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares Available That May Yet Be Repurchased Under the Program | ||||||||
April 2017 | 89 | $ | 10.20 | 89 | (3) | |||||||
May 2017 | — | — | — | (3) | ||||||||
June 2017 | 202 | 10.20 | 202 | (3) |
(1) | The estimated value per share of our common stock is $10.20, which was reaffirmed on May 9, 2017. The repurchase price per share for all stockholders is equal to the estimated value per share. |
(2) | We announced the commencement of the share repurchase program (“SRP”) on August 12, 2010, and it was subsequently amended on September 29, 2011, and on April 14, 2016. |
(3) | We currently limit the dollar value and number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the SRP, as described below. |
Our SRP may provide a limited opportunity for stockholders to have shares of common stock repurchased, subject to certain restrictions and limitations that are discussed below:
• | During any calendar year, we may repurchase no more than 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. |
• | We have no obligation to repurchase shares if the repurchase would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency. |
• | The cash available for repurchases on any particular date will generally be limited to the proceeds from the DRIP during the preceding four fiscal quarters, less any cash already used for repurchases since the beginning of the same period; however, subject to the limitations described above, we may use other sources of cash at the discretion of the |
29
board of directors. The limitations described above do not apply to shares repurchased due to a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability,” or “determination of incompetence.”
• | Only those stockholders who purchased their shares from us or received their shares from us (directly or indirectly) through one or more non-cash transactions may be able to participate in the SRP. In other words, once our shares are transferred for value by a stockholder, the transferee and all subsequent holders of the shares are not eligible to participate in the SRP. |
• | The board of directors reserves the right, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, to reject any request for repurchase. |
Our board of directors may amend, suspend, or terminate the program upon 30 days’ notice. We may provide notice by including such information (a) in a current report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC, or (b) in a separate mailing to the stockholders. In connection with the proposed agreement to acquire certain real estate assets and the third-party asset management business of Phillips Edison Limited Partnership (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements), the SRP was suspended during the month of May and resumed in June.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, repurchase requests surpassed the funding limits under the SRP. Due to the program’s funding limits, no funds will be available for the remainder of 2017. When we are unable to fulfill all repurchase requests in any month, we will honor requests on a pro rata basis to the extent possible. As of June 30, 2017, we had 9.5 million shares of unfulfilled repurchase requests, which will be treated as requests for repurchase during future months until satisfied or withdrawn. We continue to fulfill repurchases sought upon a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability,” or “determination of incompetence” in accordance with the terms of the SRP.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Ex. | Description |
2.1 | Contribution Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2017, between Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc., Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, L.P., and the Contributors Listed Therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2017) |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
101.1 | The following information from the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity; and (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows* |
*Filed herewith.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PHILLIPS EDISON GROCERY CENTER REIT I, INC. | ||
Date: August 9, 2017 | By: | /s/ Jeffrey S. Edison |
Jeffrey S. Edison | ||
Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||
Date: August 9, 2017 | By: | /s/ Devin I. Murphy |
Devin I. Murphy | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
31