POLARITYTE, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 April (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2010
Commission File No. 000-51128
Majesco Entertainment Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 06-1529524 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification No.) |
160 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, NJ 08837
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (732) 225-8910
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.4.05 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 14, 2010, there were 38,710,886 shares of the Registrants common stock
outstanding.
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
April 30, 2010 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
April 30, 2010 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
EX-10.1 | ||||||||
EX-10.2 | ||||||||
EX-10.3 | ||||||||
EX-10.4 | ||||||||
EX-10.5 | ||||||||
EX-10.6 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
April 30, | October 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 11,503 | $ | 11,839 | ||||
Due from factor |
1,154 | 1,172 | ||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net |
938 | 1,145 | ||||||
Inventory, net |
4,186 | 6,190 | ||||||
Advance payments for inventory |
1,190 | 3,126 | ||||||
Capitalized software development costs and license fees |
3,554 | 3,678 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
815 | 847 | ||||||
Total current assets |
23,340 | 27,997 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
434 | 447 | ||||||
Other assets |
69 | 83 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 23,843 | $ | 28,527 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 7,391 | $ | 9,586 | ||||
Inventory financing payables |
1,209 | 6,053 | ||||||
Advances from customers |
94 | 543 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
8,694 | 16,182 | ||||||
Warrant liability |
397 | 626 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock $.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares
authorized; 38,646,938 and 38,553,740 shares issued
and outstanding at April 30, 2010 and October 31,
2009, respectively |
39 | 38 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
114,395 | 113,484 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(99,161 | ) | (101,361 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(521 | ) | (442 | ) | ||||
Net stockholders equity |
14,752 | 11,719 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 23,843 | $ | 28,527 | ||||
See accompanying notes
3
Table of Contents
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
April 30, | April 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 10,906 | $ | 20,548 | $ | 40,112 | $ | 53,368 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
||||||||||||||||
Product costs |
5,447 | 7,816 | 17,175 | 19,647 | ||||||||||||
Software development costs and license fees |
2,232 | 6,016 | 10,099 | 14,976 | ||||||||||||
Loss on impairment of software development costs
and license fees future releases |
116 | | 1,021 | 170 | ||||||||||||
7,795 | 13,832 | 28,295 | 34,793 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit |
3,111 | 6,716 | 11,817 | 18,575 | ||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Product research and development |
707 | 1,301 | 1,641 | 2,594 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
1,527 | 3,198 | 4,584 | 7,333 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,266 | 2,099 | 4,390 | 4,593 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
44 | 69 | 97 | 138 | ||||||||||||
Settlement of litigation and related charges, net |
| 264 | | 404 | ||||||||||||
Loss on impairment of software development costs
and license fees cancelled games |
160 | 380 | 160 | 380 | ||||||||||||
4,704 | 7,311 | 10,872 | 15,442 | |||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(1,593 | ) | (595 | ) | 945 | 3,133 | ||||||||||
Other expenses (income) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and financing costs, net |
125 | 221 | 621 | 679 | ||||||||||||
Change in fair value of warrants |
(27 | ) | 880 | (229 | ) | 1,015 | ||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(1,691 | ) | (1,696 | ) | 553 | 1,439 | ||||||||||
Income taxes |
(84 | ) | | (1,647 | ) | (1,027 | ) | |||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (1,607 | ) | $ | (1,696 | ) | $ | 2,200 | $ | 2,466 | ||||||
Net (loss) income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
36,874,270 | 28,494,960 | 36,789,337 | 28,206,927 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
36,874,270 | 28,494,960 | 36,793,821 | 28,420,121 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes
4
Table of Contents
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,200 | $ | 2,466 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
97 | 138 | ||||||
Change in fair value of warrants |
(229 | ) | 1,015 | |||||
Share-based litigation settlement |
| 404 | ||||||
Non-cash compensation expense |
911 | 805 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
19 | | ||||||
Provision for price protection and customer allowances |
2,142 | 1,145 | ||||||
Amortization of software development costs and license fees |
2,839 | 4,680 | ||||||
Loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees |
1,181 | 550 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Due from factor |
(2,314 | ) | (1,382 | ) | ||||
Accounts and other receivables |
346 | 515 | ||||||
Inventory |
1,990 | 2,693 | ||||||
Capitalized software development costs and license fees |
(3,895 | ) | (7,019 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses |
1,975 | (2,341 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(1,943 | ) | 3,014 | |||||
Advances from customers |
(680 | ) | (237 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
4,639 | 6,446 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(104 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(104 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Inventory financing |
(4,844 | ) | (1,540 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(4,844 | ) | (1,540 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
(27 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(336 | ) | 4,757 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
11,839 | 5,505 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 11,503 | $ | 10,262 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 621 | $ | 680 | ||||
Litigation settlement costs paid in stock |
$ | | $ | 1,412 | ||||
See accompanying notes
5
Table of Contents
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except share amounts)
1. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Majesco Entertainment Company, together with its wholly owned subsidiary, Majesco Europe
Limited (Majesco, we or the Company), is a provider of interactive entertainment products.
The Companys offerings include video game software and other digital entertainment products.
The Companys products provide it with opportunities to capitalize on the large and growing
installed base of interactive entertainment platforms and an increasing number of interactive
entertainment enthusiasts. The Company sells its products directly and through resellers, primarily
to U.S. retail chains, including Best Buy, GameStop, Target, and Wal-Mart. Majesco also sells
products internationally, on a limited basis, through partnerships with international publishers or
licensing arrangements. The Company has developed retail and distribution network relationships
over its more than 24-year history.
Majesco provides offerings for most major interactive entertainment hardware platforms,
including Nintendos Wii, DS, and DSI, Sonys PlayStation 3, or PS3, PlayStation 2, or PS2, and
PlayStation Portable, or PSP, Microsofts Xbox and Xbox 360, the personal computer, or PC, and
mobile devices.
Majescos offerings include video game software and other digital entertainment products. The
Companys operations involve similar products and customers worldwide. These products are developed
and sold domestically and licensed or sold internationally. The Company is centrally managed and
the chief operating decision makers, the chief executive and other officers, use consolidated and
other financial information supplemented by sales information by product category, major product
title and platform for making operational decisions and assessing financial performance.
Accordingly, the Company operates in a single segment. Net sales by geographic region were as
follows:
Three Months Ended April 30, | Six Months Ended April 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | % | 2009 | % | 2010 | % | 2009 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 10,406 | 95.4 | % | $ | 20,275 | 98.7 | % | $ | 38,365 | 95.6 | % | $ | 52,020 | 97.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Europe |
500 | 4.6 | % | 273 | 1.3 | % | 1,747 | 4.4 | % | 1,348 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,906 | 100.0 | % | $ | 20,548 | 100.0 | % | $ | 40,112 | 100.0 | % | $ | 53,368 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company are
unaudited, but in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period.
Accordingly, they do not include all information and notes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements. The Companys financial results are
impacted by the seasonality of the retail selling season and the timing of the release of new
titles. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to
be expected for the entire fiscal year. The balance sheet at October 31, 2009 has been derived from
the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
complete financial statements. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes for the year
ended October 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K on January
29, 2010.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue upon the shipment of its products when:
(1) title and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred; (2) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; (3) there are no continuing obligations to the customer; and (4) the collection
of related accounts receivable is probable. Certain products are sold to customers with a street
date (the earliest date these products may be resold by retailers). Revenue for sales of these
products is not recognized prior to their street date. Some of the Companys software products
provide limited online features at no additional cost to the consumer. Such features have been
considered to be incidental to the Companys overall product offerings and an inconsequential
deliverable. Accordingly, the Company does not defer any revenue related to products containing
these limited online features. However, in instances where online features or
6
Table of Contents
additional functionality is considered a substantive deliverable in addition to the software
product, such characteristics are taken into account when applying the Companys revenue
recognition policy.
In addition, some software products are sold exclusively as downloads of digital content for
which the consumer takes possession of the digital content for a fee. Revenue from product
downloads is generally recognized when the download is made available (assuming all other
recognition criteria are met).
Inventory. Inventory consists of finished goods valued at the lower of cost or market.
Capitalized Software Development Costs and License Fees. Software development costs include
development fees, in the form of milestone payments made to independent software developers.
Software development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of a product is
established and management expects such costs to be recoverable against future revenues. For
products for which proven game engine technology exists, this may occur early in the development
cycle. Technological feasibility is evaluated on a product-by-product basis. Amounts related to
software development that are not capitalized are charged immediately to product research and
development costs. Commencing upon a related products release capitalized software development
costs and license fees are amortized to cost of sales based upon the higher of (i) the ratio of
current revenue to total projected revenue or (ii) straight-line charges over the expected
marketable life of the product.
The amortization period for capitalized software development costs and license fees is
usually no longer than one year from the initial release of the product. If actual revenues or
revised forecasted revenues fall below the initial forecasted revenue for a particular license, the
charge to cost of sales may be larger than anticipated in any given quarter. The recoverability of
capitalized software development costs and license fees is evaluated quarterly based on the
expected performance of the specific products to which the costs relate. When, in managements
estimate, future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover previously capitalized costs, the
Company expenses these capitalized costs to cost of salessoftware development costs and license
fees, in the period such a determination is made. These expenses may be incurred prior to a games
release. If a game is cancelled and never released to market, the amount is expensed to general and
administrative expenses. As of April 30, 2010, the net carrying value of the Companys licenses and
software development costs was $3.6 million. If the Company was required to write off licenses, due
to changes in market conditions or product acceptance, its results of operations could be
materially adversely affected.
On November 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC Topic 808, Accounting for Collaborative
Arrangements. which defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting requirements for
transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the
arrangement and third parties. The adoption of ASC Topic 808 did not have a significant impact on
our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three or six months ended April 30, 2010.
Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities or the disclosure of gain or
loss contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Among the more significant estimates included in these
financial statements are the estimated provisions for price protection and customer allowances, the
valuation of inventory and the recoverability of advance payments for software development costs
and intellectual property licenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Income (loss) Per Share. Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period.
Basic income (loss) per share excludes the impact of unvested shares of restricted stock issued as
long term incentive awards to directors, officers and employees. Diluted income per share reflects
the potential impact of common stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock and
outstanding common stock purchase warrants that have a dilutive effect. The table below provides a
reconciliation of basic and diluted average shares outstanding, after applying the treasury stock
method.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
April 30, | April 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
36,874,270 | 28,494,960 | 36,789,337 | 28,206,927 | ||||||||||||
Common stock purchase warrants |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Common stock options |
| | 4,484 | | ||||||||||||
Non-vested portion of restricted stock grants |
| | | 213,194 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
36,874,270 | 28,494,960 | 36,793,821 | 28,420,121 | ||||||||||||
7
Table of Contents
The table below provides total potential shares outstanding, including those that are
anti-dilutive, at the end of each reporting period:
April 30, | April 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Shares issuable under common stock warrants |
2,201,469 | 2,311,469 | ||||||
Shares issuable under stock options |
1,483,929 | 1,352,610 | ||||||
Non-vested portion of restricted stock grants |
1,771,352 | 2,187,069 | ||||||
5,456,750 | 5,851,148 | |||||||
The Company issued 57,893 and 93,198 shares of restricted stock grants, net of cancellations,
during the three and six months ended months ended April 30, 2010. The Company issued 80,068 and
162,155 shares of restricted stock grants during the three and six months ended months ended April
30, 2009. The Company also reserved 200,000 shares of common stock for stock purchase warrants
which are expected to be issued in the subsequent quarter in exchange for services.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
Amendments to Variable Interest Entity Guidance In June 2009, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance which requires an enterprise to determine whether its
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise that has both (1)
the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impacts
the entitys economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could
potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from
the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The guidance also
now requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity. The guidance is effective at the start of a companys first fiscal year
beginning after November 15, 2009 (November 1, 2010 for the Company). The Company is still
evaluating the impact that the adoption of this new guidance will have on its consolidated
financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements In October 2009, the FASB issued new guidance
related to the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. These new rules amend the
existing guidance for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements and establish a
selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. These new rules will
become effective, on a prospective basis, for the Company on November 1, 2011. The Company is still
evaluating the impact that the adoption of this new guidance will have on its consolidated
financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements In October 2009, the FASB issued
new guidance that changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements by excluding tangible
products containing both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the
products essential functionality and instead have these types of transactions be accounted for
under other accounting literature in order to determine whether the software and non-software
components function together to deliver the products essential functionality. These new rules will
become effective, on a prospective basis, for the Company on November 1, 2011. The Company is still
evaluating the impact that the adoption of this new guidance will have on its consolidated
financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
Fair Value In January 2010, the FASB issued an update to the Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 820-10 Measuring Liabilities at Fair Values (ASC 820-10). The update to ASC
820-10 requires disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements
and the reasons for the transfers, and a gross presentation of activity within the Level 3
rollforward, presenting separately information about purchases, sales issuances and settlements.
The update to ASC 820-10 was adopted by the Company in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010,
except for the gross presentation of the Level 3 rollforward which will be adopted by the Company
in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the
update to ASC 820-10, but does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows.
8
Table of Contents
Reclassifications. For comparability, certain 2009 amounts have been reclassified, where
appropriate, to conform to the financial statement presentation used in 2010.
Commitments and Contingencies. The Company records a liability for commitments and
contingencies when the amount is both probable and can be reasonably estimated.
3. FAIR VALUE
As of November 1, 2009, we adopted the guidance for Fair Value Measurements which establishes a
three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This
hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
| Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||
| Level 2Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. | ||
| Level 3Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. |
The table below segregates all financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on
a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the
inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date.
Quoted prices | Significant | |||||||||||||||
in active markets | Significant other | unobservable | ||||||||||||||
for identical assets | observable inputs | inputs | ||||||||||||||
April 30, 2010 | (level 1) | (level 2) | (level 3) | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 10,039 | $ | 10,039 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Bank- deposit |
$ | 1,464 | $ | 1,464 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Total financial assets |
$ | 11,503 | $ | 11,503 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Warrant liability |
$ | 397 | $ | | $ | | $ | 397 | ||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
$ | 397 | $ | | $ | | $ | 397 | ||||||||
On September 5, 2007, the Company issued warrants in connection with a private placement of
its common stock. The warrants entitled the holders to purchase an aggregate of 1,697,735 shares of
common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $2.04 per share and a term of five years, and
became exercisable six months from the issue date. The warrants contain a provision that may
require settlement by transferring assets under certain change of control circumstances. Therefore,
they are classified as liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities
from Equity.
The Company measures the fair value of the warrants at each balance sheet date, and records
the change in fair value as a non-cash charge or gain to earnings each period. The warrants were
valued at $397 and $626 at April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively. The Company recorded
a non-cash gain of $27, and a non-cash charge of $880, due to the change in fair value of warrants
during the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, and a non-cash gain of $229, and a non-cash
charge of $1,015, due to the change in fair value of warrants during the six months ended April 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company used the Black-Scholes method to value the warrants,
assuming volatility ranging from 65.4% to 76.1%, a life of 2.9 to 5 years, and a cost of capital
ranging from 1.43% to 4.16%.
The following table is a rollforward of the fair value of the Warrants, as to which fair
value is determined by Level 3 inputs :
Six Months | Year | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
April 30, | October 31, | |||||||
Description | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 626 | $ | 211 | ||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| | ||||||
Total loss (gain) included in net loss |
(229 | ) | 415 | |||||
Ending balance |
$ | 397 | $ | 626 | ||||
9
Table of Contents
The carrying value of accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and
accrued expenses, due from factor, and advances from customers are reasonable estimates of the fair
values because of their short-term maturity.
4. INCOME TAXES
In December 2009 and November 2008, the Company received proceeds of approximately $1,656 and
$1,115, respectively, from the sale of the rights to approximately $21,200 and $25,900,
respectively, of New Jersey state income tax operating loss carryforwards, under the Technology
Business Tax Certificate Program administered by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority.
After the transfer, the Company had approximately $32,000 of net operating loss carryforwards
remaining in the state of New Jersey. Net proceeds from the transfers have been recorded as an
income tax benefit during the six months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009.
The only federal income provision recorded by the Company was for alternative minimum taxes,
which amounts are not material. No other provision for income taxes has been recorded because the
Company has available net operating loss carryforwards to offset any taxable income.
5. DUE FROM FACTOR
Due from factor consists of the following:
April 30, | October 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Outstanding accounts receivable sold to factor |
$ | 5,377 | $ | 19,307 | ||||
Less: allowances |
(3,402 | ) | (4,380 | ) | ||||
Less: advances from factor |
(821 | ) | (13,755 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,154 | $ | 1,172 | |||||
Approximately $5,377 of accounts receivable were sold to the factor at April 30, 2010, of
which the Company assumed credit risk of approximately $1,718. Approximately $19,307 of accounts
receivable were sold to the factor at October 31, 2009, of which the Company assumed credit risk of
approximately $6,900. The following table sets forth the adjustments to the price protection and
other customer sales incentive allowances included as a reduction of the amounts due from factor:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance beginning of period |
$ | (4,380 | ) | $ | (3,359 | ) | ||
Add: provision |
(2,331 | ) | (1,145 | ) | ||||
Less: amounts charged against allowance |
3,309 | 2,476 | ||||||
Balance end of period |
$ | (3,402 | ) | $ | (2,028 | ) | ||
As of April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, there were no allowances for uncollectible
accounts.
6. ACCOUNTS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
The following table presents the major components of accounts and other receivables:
April 30, | October 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 1,003 | $ | 1,388 | ||||
Allowances |
(89 | ) | (295 | ) | ||||
Other |
24 | 52 | ||||||
$ | 938 | $ | 1,145 | |||||
10
Table of Contents
7. PREPAID EXPENSES
The following table presents the major components of prepaid expenses:
April 30, | October 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Prepaid media advertising |
$ | 716 | $ | 627 | ||||
Other |
99 | 220 | ||||||
$ | 815 | $ | 847 | |||||
8. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:
April 30, | October 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Accounts payable trade |
$ | 4,565 | $ | 3,990 | ||||
Accrued expenses: |
||||||||
Royalties including accrued minimum
guarantees |
1,537 | 3,680 | ||||||
Salaries and other compensation |
774 | 648 | ||||||
Sales commissions |
58 | 197 | ||||||
Billings due to distribution partner |
| 230 | ||||||
Other accruals |
457 | 841 | ||||||
$ | 7,391 | $ | 9,586 | |||||
9. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income for the three and six month periods ended April 30,
2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
April 30, | April 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (1,607 | ) | $ | (1,696 | ) | $ | 2,200 | $ | 2,466 | ||||||
Other comprehensive loss Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(43 | ) | (5 | ) | (79 | ) | (163 | ) | ||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
$ | (1,650 | ) | $ | (1,701 | ) | $ | 2,121 | $ | 2,303 | ||||||
10. CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS
Commitments
At April 30, 2010, the Company was committed under agreements with certain developers and
licensors for future milestone, purchasing and license fee payments aggregating $7,059, which are
payable within one year from the balance sheet date. Milestone payments represent scheduled
installments due to the Companys developers based upon the developers providing the Company
certain deliverables, as predetermined in the Companys contracts. The milestone payments generally
represent advances against royalties to the developers. These payments will be used to reduce
future royalties due to the developers from sales of the Companys video games.
The Company has entered into at will employment agreements with certain key executives.
These employment agreements include provisions for, among other things, annual compensation, bonus
arrangements and equity compensation. These agreements also contain provisions relating to
severance terms and change of control provisions.
11
Table of Contents
11. WORKFORCE REDUCTION
During January 2010, Company management initiated a plan of restructuring to better align its
workforce to its revised operating plans. As part of the plan, the Company reduced its personnel
count by 16 employees, representing 17% of its workforce. Employees directly affected by the
restructuring plan received notification during the six months ended April 30, 2010. The Company
recorded charges of approximately $403 in the first quarter of 2010 in connection with the
terminations, which consist primarily of severance and unused vacation payments. The expenses are
included in operating costs and expenses as shown in the table below:
Six Months Ended | ||||
April 30, 2010 | ||||
Product research and development |
$ | 90 | ||
Selling and Marketing |
243 | |||
General and Administrative |
70 | |||
Total |
$ | 403 | ||
These payments will be made during the Companys fiscal year ending October 31, 2010. At April 30,
2010, the Company had accrued amounts payable related to severance of $74.
12. RELATED PARTIES
The Company currently has an agreement with Morris Sutton, the Companys former Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman Emeritus, under which he provides services as a consultant. The
agreement provides for a monthly retainer of $13. Mr. Sutton was also eligible to receive a
commission in an amount equal to 2% of net sales to certain accounts before January 1, 2010.
Commissions were recorded when the sales occurred, but are not paid until payments of the related
accounts receivable are received from customers. Therefore, some of these payments will be made to
Mr. Sutton in 2010. Consulting expenses for the six months ended April 30, 2009 include $28 of fees
earned in each of November and December of 2008 under Mr. Suttons prior agreement which expired on
December 31, 2008.
The following table summarizes expenses related to the agreement with Morris Sutton:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
April 30, | April 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Consulting |
$ | 38 | $ | 38 | $ | 75 | $ | 108 | ||||||||
Business expenses |
11 | 4 | 11 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 49 | $ | 42 | $ | 86 | $ | 114 | ||||||||
The following table summarizes commission payments made to Morris Sutton:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
April 30, | April 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Commissions (accrued prior to January 1, 2010) |
$ | 86 | $ | 62 | $ | 131 | $ | 149 | ||||||||
The Company had accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $6 and $37 as of April
30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively, due to the agreement with Morris Sutton.
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical
are forward-looking information and statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These include statements
regarding managements expectations, intentions, or strategies regarding future matters. All
forward-looking statements included in this document are based on available information as of the
date hereof. It is important to note that actual results could differ materially from those
projected in such forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The
forward-looking statements contained herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous
risks and uncertainties.
12
Table of Contents
Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments regarding among other things, the
Companys ability to secure financing or investment for capital expenditures, future economic and
competitive market conditions, and future business decisions. All these matters are difficult or
impossible to predict accurately, many of which may be beyond Majescos control. Although
management believes that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable,
any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the
forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will prove to be
accurate.
Overview
We are a provider of interactive entertainment products. We sell our products primarily to
large retail chains, specialty retail stores, video game rental outlets and distributors. We also
sell our products internationally, on a limited basis, through distribution
agreements with other publishers or licensing agreements. We have developed our retail and
distribution network over our 24-year history.
We publish video game software for most major interactive entertainment hardware platforms,
including Nintendos Wii, DSi, and DS, Sonys PlayStation 3 (PS3) Sonys PlayStation 2 (PS2) and
PlayStation Portable, (PSP), Microsofts Xbox and Xbox 360, the personal computer (PC) and
other mobile devices.
Our video game titles are targeted at various demographics at a range of price points. In some
instances, these titles are based on licenses of well-known properties, and in other cases based on
original properties. We collaborate and enter into agreements with content providers and video game
development studios for the creation of the majority of our video games.
Our business model and product strategy is primarily focused on games with relatively lower
development costs for both console and handheld systems targeting mass market consumers. We
believe this strategy allows us to capitalize on our strengths and expertise while reducing some of
the cost and risk associated with publishing console titles for core gamers. We continue to publish
titles for popular handheld systems such as the DS and PSP. We also publish software for Nintendos
Wii console, as we believe this platform allows us to develop games within our cost parameters,
while enabling us to reach mass market consumers. In addition, we continue to look
opportunistically for titles to publish on the PC and other home console systems. More recently,
other platforms such as Xbox 360 have begun to see mass market adoption, and we have begun to
develop games for this platform. We will continue to evaluate opportunities to reach our target
demographic as other platforms move in this direction.
We license rights to intellectual property used in our video games from third parties and work
with third-party development studios to develop our own proprietary video game titles.
Our operations involve similar products and customers worldwide. These products are developed
and sold domestically and internationally. The Company is centrally managed and our chief operating
decision makers, the chief executive and other officers, use consolidated and other financial
information supplemented by sales information by product category, major product title and platform
for making operational decisions and assessing financial performance. Accordingly, we operate in a
single segment.
Net Revenues. Our revenues are principally derived from sales of our video games. We provide
video games primarily for the mass market and casual game player. Our revenues are recognized net
of estimated reserves for price protection and other allowances.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales consists of product costs and amortization and impairment of
software development costs and license fees. A significant component of our cost of sales is
product costs. Product costs are comprised primarily of manufacturing and packaging costs of the
disc or cartridge media, royalties to the platform manufacturer and manufacturing and packaging
costs of peripherals. Commencing upon the related products release, capitalized software
development and intellectual property license costs are amortized to cost of sales. When, in
managements estimate, future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover previously capitalized
costs, we expense these capitalized costs to cost of sales-loss on impairment of software
development costs and license fees future releases. These expenses may be incurred prior to a
games release.
Gross Profit. Gross profit is the excess of net revenues over product costs and amortization
and impairment of software development and license fees. Development and license fees incurred to
produce video games are generally incurred up front and amortized to cost of sales. The recovery of
these costs and total gross profit is dependent upon achieving a certain sales volume, which varies
by title.
13
Table of Contents
Product Research and Development Expenses. Product research and development expenses relate
principally to our cost of supervision of third-party video game developers, testing new products
and conducting quality assurance evaluations during the development cycle as well as costs incurred
at our development studio, which was closed in 2009, that are not allocated to games for which
technological feasibility has been established. Costs incurred are employee-related, may include
equipment, and are not allocated to cost of sales.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses consist of marketing and
promotion expenses, the cost of shipping products to customers and related employee costs. A
component of these expenses are credits to retailers for trade advertising.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses primarily represent
employee-related costs, including corporate executive and support staff, general office expenses,
professional fees and various other overhead charges. Professional fees, including legal and
accounting expenses, typically represent the second largest component of our general and
administrative expenses. These fees are partially attributable to our required activities as a
publicly traded company, such as SEC filings.
Loss on Impairment of Software Development Costs and License Fees Cancelled Games. Loss on
impairment of software development costs and license fees cancelled games consists of contract
termination costs, and the write-off of previously capitalized costs, for games that were cancelled
prior to their release to market. We periodically review our games in development and compare the
remaining cost to complete each game to projected future net cash flows expected to be generated
from sales. In cases where we dont expect the projected future net cash flows generated from sales
to be sufficient to cover the remaining incremental cash obligation to complete the game, we cancel
the game, and record a charge to operating expenses. While we incur a current period charge on
these cancellations, we believe we are limiting the overall loss on a game project that is no
longer expected to perform as originally expected due to changing market conditions or other
factors. Significant management estimates are required in making these assessments, including
estimates regarding retailer and customer interest, pricing, competitive game performance, and
changing market conditions. Loss on impairment of software development costs and license fees
cancelled games was $0.2 million and $0.4 million for both the three and six months ended April 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
Interest and Financing Costs. Interest and financing costs are directly attributable to our
factoring and our purchase-order financing arrangements.
Income Taxes. Income taxes consists of our provision for income taxes and proceeds from the
sale of rights to certain net operating loss carryforwards in the state of New Jersey. Utilization
of our net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation
due to the change in ownership provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The annual limitation may
result in the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards before utilization. Due to our history
of losses, a valuation allowance sufficient to fully offset our NOL and other deferred tax assets
has been established under current accounting pronouncements, and this valuation allowance will be
maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal.
Seasonality and Variations in Interim Quarterly Results
Our quarterly net revenues, gross profit, and operating income are impacted significantly by
the seasonality of the retail selling season, and the timing of the release of new titles. Sales of
our catalog and other products are generally higher in the first and fourth quarters of our fiscal
year (ending January 31 and October 31, respectively) due to increased retail sales during the
holiday season. Sales and gross profit as a percentage of sales also generally increase in quarters
in which we release significant new titles because of increased sales volume as retailers make
purchases to stock their shelves and meet initial demand for the new release. These quarters also
benefit from the higher selling prices that we are able to achieve early in the products life
cycle. Therefore, sales results in any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of expected
results for subsequent quarters during the fiscal year.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP).
14
Table of Contents
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) made the Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized the by the
FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretative releases of the FASB Codification did not
create any new GAAP standards but incorporated existing accounting and reporting standards into a
topical structure with a new referencing system to identify authoritative accounting standards,
replaced the prior references.
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could
differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and to the
understanding of our financial results. The impact and any associated risks related to these
policies on our business operations is discussed throughout managements discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations where such policies affect our reported and expected
financial results.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue upon the shipment of our product when: (1) risks and
rewards of ownership are transferred; (2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (3) we have
no continuing obligations to the customer; and (4) the collection of related accounts receivable is
probable. Certain products are sold to customers with a street date (the earliest date these
products may be resold by retailers). Revenue for sales of these products is not recognized prior
to their street date. Some of our software products provide limited online features at no
additional cost to the consumer. Generally, we have considered such features to be incidental to
our overall product offerings and an inconsequential deliverable. Accordingly, we do not defer any
revenue related to products containing these limited online features. However, in instances where
online features or additional functionality is considered a substantive deliverable in addition to
the software product, such characteristics are taken into account when applying our revenue
recognition policy. In addition, some of our software products are sold exclusively as downloads of
digital content for which the consumer takes possession of the digital content for a fee. Revenue
from product downloads is generally recognized when the download is made available (assuming all
other recognition criteria are met).
Reserves for Price Protection and Other Allowances. We generally sell our products on a
no-return basis, although in certain instances, we provide price protection or other allowances on
certain unsold products in accordance with industry practices. Price protection, when granted and
applicable, allows customers a partial credit with respect to merchandise unsold by them. Revenue
is recognized net of estimates of these allowances. Sales incentives and other consideration that
represent costs incurred by us for assets or services received, such as the appearance of our
products in a customers national circular advertisement, are generally reflected as selling and
marketing expenses. We estimate potential future product price protection and other discounts
related to current period product revenue.
Our reserves for price protection and other allowances fluctuate over periods as a result of a
number of factors including analysis of historical experience, current sell-through of retailer
inventory of our products, current trends in the interactive entertainment market, the overall
economy, changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products and other related factors.
Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with
establishing the allowance for returns and price protection in any accounting period. However,
actual allowances granted could materially exceed our estimates as unsold products in the
distribution channels are exposed to rapid changes in consumer preferences, market conditions,
technological obsolescence due to new platforms, product updates or competing products. For
example, the risk of requests for allowances may increase as consoles pass the midpoint of their
lifecycle and an increasing number of competitive products heighten pricing and competitive
pressures. While management believes it can make reliable estimates regarding these matters, these
estimates are inherently subjective. Accordingly, if our estimates change, this will result in a
change in our reserves, which would impact the net revenues and/or selling and marketing expenses
we report. For the three month periods ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, we provided allowances for
future price protection and other allowances of $1.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For
the six month periods ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, we provided allowances for future price
protection and other allowances of $2.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The fluctuations in
the provisions reflected our estimates of future price protection based on the factors discussed
above. We limit our exposure to credit risk by factoring a portion of our receivables to a third
party that buys them without recourse. For receivables that are not sold without recourse, we
analyze our aged accounts receivables, payment history and other factors to make a determination if
collection of receivables is likely, or a provision for uncollectible accounts is necessary.
15
Table of Contents
Capitalized Software Development Costs and License Fees. Software development costs include
development fees, in the form of milestone payments made to independent software developers.
Software development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of a product is
established and management expects such costs to be recoverable against future revenues. For
products where proven game engine technology exists, this may occur early in the development cycle.
Technological feasibility is evaluated on a product-by-product basis. Amounts related to software
development that are not capitalized are charged immediately to product research and development
costs. Commencing upon a related products release capitalized software development costs are
amortized to cost of sales based upon the higher of (i) the ratio of current revenue to total
projected revenue or (ii) straight-line charges over the expected marketable life of the product.
On November 1, 2009, we adopted ASC 808, Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements. ASC Topic
808 defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting requirements for transactions
between participants in a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the arrangement and
third parties. The adoption of ASC Topic 808 did not have a significant impact on our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for the three or six months ended April 30, 2010.
License fees represent license fees to holders for the use of their intellectual
property rights in the development of our products. Minimum guaranteed royalty payments for
intellectual property licenses are initially recorded as an asset (capitalized license fees) and a
current liability (accrued royalties payable) at the contractual amount upon execution of the
contract or when specified milestones or events occur and when no significant performance
commitment remains with the licensor. Licenses are expensed to cost of sales at the higher of (i)
the contractual royalty rate based on actual sales or (ii) an effective rate based upon total
projected revenue related to such license.
Capitalized software development costs are classified as non-current if they relate to titles
for which we estimate the release date to be more than one year from the balance sheet date.
The amortization period for capitalized software development costs and license fees is
usually no longer than one year from the initial release of the product. If actual revenues or
revised forecasted revenues fall below the initial forecasted revenue for a particular license, the
charge to cost of sales may be larger than anticipated in any given quarter. The recoverability of
capitalized software development costs and license fees is evaluated quarterly based on the
expected performance of the specific products to which the costs relate.
When, in managements estimate, future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover previously
capitalized costs, we expense these capitalized costs to cost of salesloss on impairment of
software development costs and license fees future releases, in the period such a determination
is made. These expenses may be incurred prior to a games release. If a game is cancelled and never
released to market, the amount is expensed to operating costs and expenses-loss on impairment of
capitalized software development costs and license fees cancelled games. As of April 30, 2010,
the net carrying value of our licenses and software development costs was $3.6 million. If we were
required to write off licenses or software development costs, due to changes in market conditions
or product acceptance, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
License fees and milestone payments made to our third-party developers are typically
considered non-refundable advances against the total compensation they can earn based upon the
sales performance of the products. Any additional royalty or other compensation earned beyond the
milestone payments is expensed to cost of sales as incurred.
Inventory. Inventory, which consists principally of finished goods, is stated at the lower of
cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method. We estimate the net
realizable value of slow-moving inventory on a title-by-title basis and charge the excess of cost
over net realizable value to cost of sales.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation expense is measured at the
grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting
period. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment,
including, in the case of stock option awards, estimating expected stock volatility. In addition,
judgment is also required in estimating the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be
forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation
expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.
16
Table of Contents
Commitments and Contingencies. We record a liability for commitments and contingencies when
the amount is both probable and reasonably estimable.
Revenue by platform
The following Table sets forth our net revenues by platform:
Three Months Ended April 30, | Six Months Ended April 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | % | 2009 | % | 2010 | % | 2009 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nintendo Wii |
$ | 2,678 | 24.6 | % | $ | 10,734 | 52.2 | % | $ | 10,651 | 26.6 | % | $ | 31,737 | 59.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Nintendo DS |
8,002 | 73.4 | % | 9,305 | 45.3 | % | 28,257 | 70.4 | % | 20,463 | 38.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
226 | 2.0 | % | 509 | 2.5 | % | 1,204 | 3.0 | % | 1,168 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
$ | 10,906 | 100.0 | % | $ | 20,548 | 100.0 | % | $ | 40,112 | 100.0 | % | $ | 53,368 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Results of operations
Three months ended April 30, 2010 versus three months ended April 30, 2009
Net Revenues. Net revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2010 decreased to $10.9
million from $20.5 million in the comparable quarter last year. The $9.6 million decrease was
primarily due to decreased sales of games for the Nintendo Wii console, and decreased revenues from
newly released games. In October 2008, we released Jillian Michaels Fitness Ultimatum, for the
Nintendo Wii. The game was released during a time of rapid growth for the Wii platform and the
introduction of a balance board for use with fitness games on the platform. This resulted in
significant sales during the 2008 holiday selling season, as well as strong catalog sales during
the second quarter of 2009, which is reflected in our results for the three months ended April 30,
2009. Comparatively, while we did release a sequel to the Jillian Michaels game, Jillian Michaels:
Resolution, for the 2009 holiday season, its revenues were substantially lower than the previous
years title, primarily due to an increase in competitive fitness games and resulting market
saturation. In addition, we released Gardening Mama for the Nintendo DS during the three months
ended April 30, 2009. Comparatively, we released The Daring Game for Girls for the Nintendo Wii and
DS, Pizza Boy for the Nintendo Wii, and no new products from the Cooking Mama line during the three
months ended April 30, 2010. This resulted in lower revenue from new releases when compared to the
prior year, and a decline in revenue from our Cooking Mama line
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the three months ended April 30, 2010 was $3.1 million compared
to a gross profit of $6.7 million in the same quarter last year. The decrease in gross profit was
attributable to: (i) the lower net revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2010 discussed
above; (ii) an increase in impairment of capitalized software development and license costs
future releases of $0.1 million; and (iii) a decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales.
Impairment of capitalized software development and license costs future releases for the three
months ended April 30, 2010 consisted of the write-down of a game in development for the Nintendo
Wii for which, given current market conditions for games on this platform, projected net cash flows
expected to be generated from sales are lower than the capitalized software development costs and
capitalized royalties required to publish the games. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales, was
29% for the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to 33% for the three months ended April 30,
2009. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of sales was primarily attributable to a lower
average selling price for Wii products during the three months ended April 30, 2010, as compared to
the corresponding period in 2009. We attribute the decrease in average selling price to increased
competitiveness in the Wii marketplace as the console matures.
Product Research and Development Expenses. Product research and development expenses decreased
$0.6 million to $0.7 million for the three months ended April 30, 2010, from $1.3 million for the
comparable period in 2009. The decrease was primarily the result of expenses related to our
development studio. After evaluation of the studios performance, and changes in the availability
and cost of development with our third-party partners, we reduced the number of personnel at the
studio in the second half of 2009. Additionally, approximately $0.2 million was expensed for
development of iPhone games for which technological feasibility had not been established during the
six months ended April 30, 2009.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Total selling and marketing expenses were approximately $1.5
million for the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to $3.2 million for the three months
ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to lower advertising media costs, and lower
commission and shipping costs due to lower sales. During the three months ended April 30, 2009 we
ran several television advertising campaigns. After analyzing the costs and benefits of these
programs, we decided to reduce our media-related expenditures during the three months ended April
30, 2010.
17
Table of Contents
General and Administrative Expenses. For the three month period ended April 30, 2010, general
and administrative expenses were $2.3 million, an increase of $0.2 million from $2.1 million in the
comparable period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to increased Sarbanes-Oxley compliance
and investor relations expenses. General and administrative expenses include $0.4 million of
non-cash compensation expenses for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Settlement of Litigation Charges. Settlement of litigation charges for the three months ended
January 31, 2009 represented the change in fair value since October 31, 2008 of one million shares
of common stock to be issued in settlement of our class action securities litigation. The shares
were issued in March of 2009.
Operating Loss. Operating loss for the three months ended April 30, 2010 was approximately
$1.6 million, an increase of $1.0 million from $0.6 million in the comparable period in 2009. As
discussed above, decreased revenues and gross profits during the three months ended April 30, 2010
were partially offset by decreased operating expenses during the same period.
Interest and Financing Costs, Net. Interest and financing costs were approximately $0.1
million for the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to $0.2 million for the three months
ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was due to decreased factoring fees resulting from lower sales.
Change in Fair Value of Warrants. On September 5, 2007, we issued warrants in connection with
an equity financing. The warrants contain a provision that may require settlement by transferring
assets. Therefore, they are recorded at fair value as liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.
We recorded a gain of $0.03 million for the three months ended April 30, 2010, reflecting the
decrease in the fair value of the warrants during the period, compared to a charge of $0.9 million
for the three months ended April 30, 2009, reflecting an increase in the fair value of warrants
during the period.
Income Taxes. For the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, we reversed $0.1 million of
provision for alternative minimum taxes recorded in the first quarter. We recorded no additional
income tax benefit because realization of our net operating loss carryforwards was not deemed more
likely than not.
Net Loss. Net loss for the three months ended April 30, 2010 was $1.6 million compared to $1.7
million for the three months ended April 30, 2009. As discussed above, decreased revenues and
gross profits were offset by decreased operating expenses related to the closing of our development
studio and decreased advertising expenses.
Six months ended April 30, 2010 versus six months ended April 30, 2009
Net Revenues. Net revenues for the six months ended April 30, 2010 decreased to $40.1 million
from $53.4 million in the comparable quarter last year. The $13.3 million decrease was primarily
due to decreased sales of games for the Nintendo Wii console, and decreased revenues from newly
released games. In October 2008, we released two games for the Wii platform, Jillian Michaels
Fitness Ultimatum, and Cooking Mama: World Kitchen. The success of these games, during a time of
rapid growth for the Wii platform resulted in significant sales during the 2008 holiday selling
season, and reorders thereafter, which is reflected in our results for the six months ended April
30, 2009. Comparatively, while we did release a sequel to the Jillian Michaels game, Jillian
Michaels: Resolution, for the 2009 holiday season, its revenues were substantially lower than the
previous years title, primarily due to similar titles introduced by other publishers at the same
time. In addition, the market for Wii games has become more difficult as the platform has matured,
and the number of games for the consumer to choose from has increased. During the six months ended
April 30, 2009 we released Cooking Mama World Kitchen for the Nintendo Wii and Gardening Mama for
the Nintendo DS. Comparatively, during the six months ended April 30, 2010 we released: Alvin and
the Chipmunks the Sqeakquelfot the Nintendo Wii and Ds; The Daring Game for Girls for the Nintendo
Wii and DS; Pizza Boy for the Nintendo Wii; and no new titles from the Cooking Mama product line.
This contributed to a decline in revenue from our Cooking Mama products, and total net revenues.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was $11.8 million compared
to a gross profit of $18.6 million in the same quarter last year. The decrease in gross profit was
attributable to: (i) the lower net revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2010 discussed
above; (ii) an increase in impairment of capitalized software development and license costs
future releases of $0.9 million; and (iii) a decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales.
Impairment of capitalized software development and
18
Table of Contents
license costs future releases for the three months ended April 30, 2010 consisted of the
write-down of games in development for the Nintendo Wii for which, given current market conditions
for games on this platform, projected net cash flows expected to be generated from sales are lower
than the capitalized software development costs and capitalized royalties required to publish the
games. Impairment of capitalized software development and license costs future releases for the
six months ended April 30, 2009 consisted of the write-off of capitalized costs incurred in our
development studio related to a game for the Nintendo DS, for which costs were not expected to be
recovered through future cash flows due to budget over-runs in development of the game. Gross
profit as a percentage of net sales, excluding the impact of the impairment of software development
costs and license fees future releases was 32% for the six months ended April 30, 2010 compared
to 35% for the six months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of
sales was primarily attributable to a lower average selling price for Wii products during the six
months ended April 30, 2010, as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. We attribute the
decrease in average selling price to increased competitiveness in the Wii marketplace as the
console matures. Gross profit as a percentage of sales, including the impact of impairment of
software development costs and license fees future releases was 29% for the six months ended
April 30, 2010, compared to 35% for the six months ended April 30, 2009.
Product Research and Development Expenses. Product research and development expensess
decreased $1.0 million to $1.6 million for the six months ended April 30, 2010, from $2.6 million
for the comparable period in 2009. The decrease was primarily the result of expenses related to our
development studio. After evaluation of the studios performance, and changes in the availability
and cost of development with our third-party partners, we reduced the number of personnel at the
studio in the second half of 2009. Additionally, approximately $0.2 million was expensed for a
video game technology project that was terminated during the six months ended April 30, 2009.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Total selling and marketing expenses were approximately $4.6
million for the six months ended April 30, 2010 compared to $7.3 million for the six months ended
April 30, 2009. The $2.7 million decrease was primarily due to lower advertising media costs of
approximately $2.1 million and lower shipping and commission expense related to lower sales. During
the six months ended April 30, 2009 we ran several television advertising campaigns. After
analyzing the costs and benefits of these programs, we decided to reduce our media-related
expenditures during the six months ended April 30, 2010. In addition, during the six months ended
April 30, 2010, we reduced sales and production staff in the U.S., and sales staff in the United
Kingdom, related to the termination of our direct distribution strategy in Europe. In total, we
incurred a total of $0.4 million in severance costs related to the staff reductions during the six
months ended April 30, 2010, classified as follows: (i) Product Research and Development Expenses
of $0.1 million; (ii) Selling and Marketing Expenses of $0.2 million; and (iii) General and
Administrative expenses of $0.1 million. Selling and Marketing expense as a percentage of net sales
was approximately 11% for the six months ended April 30, 2010 compared to 14% for the six months
ended April 30, 2009.
General and Administrative Expenses. For the six month period ended April 30, 2010, general
and administrative expenses were $4.4 million, a decrease of $0.2 million from $4.6 million in the
comparable period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to lower compensation expenses relating
to our incentive compensation program. This incentive program is primarily based on net income
generated by the Company. General and administrative expenses include $0.9 million and $0.8 million
of non-cash compensation expenses for the six months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Non cash compensation expense for the six months ended April 30, 2010 included approximately $0.1
million of expense related to the accelerated vesting of restricted stock upon termination of an
employee.
Settlement of Litigation Charges. Settlement of litigation charges for the six months ended
April 30, 2009 represents the change in fair value since October 31, 2008 of one million shares of
common stock to be issued in settlement of our class action securities litigation. The shares were
issued in March of 2009.
Operating Income. Operating income for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was approximately
$0.9 million, a decrease of $2.2 million from $3.1 million in the comparable period in 2009. As
discussed above, decreased revenues and gross profits during the six months ended April 30, 2010
were partially offset by decreased operating expenses during the same period.
Interest and Financing Costs, Net. Interest and financing costs were approximately $0.6
million for the six months ended April 30, 2010 compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended
April 30, 2009. The decrease was due to lower factoring fees resulting from lower sales.
19
Table of Contents
Change in Fair Value of Warrants. On September 5, 2007, we issued warrants in connection with
an equity financing. The warrants contain a provision that may require settlement by transferring
assets. Therefore, they are recorded at fair value as liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.
We recorded a gain of $0.2 million for the six months ended April 30, 2010, reflecting the
decrease in the fair value of the warrants during the period, compared to a charge of $1.0 million
for the six months ended April 30, 2009, reflecting an increase in the fair value of warrants
during the period.
Income Taxes. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, income taxes were comprised a tax
benefit of $1.6 million related to the sale of the rights to certain New Jersey state net operating
loss carryforwards.
We recorded no provision for income taxes other than alternative minimum taxes because our net
operating loss carryforwards exceeded our taxable income.
For the six months ended April 30, 2009, income taxes were comprised of a provision for
alternative minimum taxes of $0.1 million, and a tax benefit of $1.1 million related to the sale of
the rights to certain New Jersey state net operating loss carryforwards. We recorded no provision
for income taxes other than alternative minimum taxes because our net operating loss carryforwards
exceeded our taxable income.
In December 2009 and November 2008, we received proceeds of approximately $1.6 million and
$1.1 million, respectively, from the sale of the rights to approximately $21.2 million and $25.9
million of New Jersey state income tax operating loss carryforwards, under the Technology Business
Tax Certificate Program administered by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority. After the
transfer, we have approximately $32.0 million of net operating loss carryforwards remaining in the
state of New Jersey. Net proceeds have been recorded as an income tax benefit during each of the
six months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009.
Net Income. Net income for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was $2.2 million, a decrease of
$0.3 million from $2.5 million for the six months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily
due to the decreased operating income discussed above, partially offset by increased gains related
to the change in fair value of warrants and sale of net operating losses discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We generated a profit of $2.2 million for the six months ended April 30, 2010. However, our
operating results vary significantly from period to period. On an annual basis, we generated a net
loss of $7.2 million in 2009, net income of $3.4 million in 2008, and a net loss of $4.8 million in
2007. Historically, we have funded our operating losses through sales of our equity and use of our
purchase order financing and factor arrangements to satisfy seasonal working capital needs. We
raised approximately $5.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of our equity securities in
September 2007, and approximately $8.6 million in September 2009.
Our current plan is to fund our operations through product sales. However, we may be required
to modify that plan, or seek outside sources of financing if our operating plan and sales targets
are not met. There can be no assurance that such funds will be available on acceptable terms, if at
all. In the event that we are unable to negotiate alternative financing, or negotiate terms that
are acceptable to us, we may be forced to modify our business plan materially, including making
more reductions in game development and other expenditures. Based on our current level of cash on
hand and our operating plan, management believes it can operate under the existing level of
financing for at least one year. However, if the current level of financing was reduced and we were
unable to obtain alternative financing, it could create a material adverse change in the business.
Our cash and cash equivalents balance was $11.5 million as of April 30, 2010. We expect
continued fluctuations in the use and availability of cash due to the seasonality of our business,
timing of receivables collections and working capital needs necessary to finance our business and
growth objectives through at least the next year.
To satisfy our liquidity needs, we factor our receivables. We also utilize purchase order
financing through the factor and through a finance company to provide funding for the manufacture
of our products. In connection with these arrangements, the finance company and the factor have a
security interest in substantially all of our assets.
20
Table of Contents
Under our factoring agreement, we have the ability to take cash advances against accounts
receivable and inventory of up to $20.0 million, and the availability of up to $2.0 million in
letters of credit. The factor, in its sole discretion, can reduce the availability of financing at
anytime. At April 30, 2010, we had approximately $5.5 million available to us for advances under
the agreement, with approximately $0.8 million in outstanding advances against that amount. In
addition, we have $10.0 million of availability for letters of credit and purchase order financing
with a finance company, of which $1.2 million was utilized at April 30, 2010.
Factoring and Purchase Order Financing. As mentioned above, to provide liquidity, we take
advances from our factor and utilize purchase order financing to fund the manufacturing of our
products.
Under the terms of our factoring agreement, we sell our accounts receivable to the factor. The
factor, in its sole discretion, determines whether or not it will accept the credit risk associated
with a receivable. If the factor does not accept the credit risk on a receivable, we may sell the
accounts receivable to the factor while retaining the credit risk. In both cases we surrender all
rights and control over the receivable to the factor. However, in cases where we retain the credit
risk, the amount can be charged back to us in the case of non-payment by the customer. The factor
is required to remit payments to us for the accounts receivable purchased from us, provided the
customer does not have a valid dispute related to the invoice. The amount remitted to us by the
factor equals the invoiced amount, adjusted for allowances and discounts we have provided to the
customer, less factor charges of 0.45 to 0.5% of the invoiced amount.
In addition, we may request that the factor provide us with cash advances based on our
accounts receivable and inventory. The factor may either accept or reject our request for advances
at its discretion. Generally, the factor allowed us to take advances in an amount equal to 70% of
net accounts receivable, plus 60% of our inventory balance, up to a maximum of $2.5 million.
Occasionally the factor allows us to take advances in excess of these amounts for short-term
working capital needs. These excess amounts are typically repaid within a 30-day period. At April
30, 2010, we had no excess advances outstanding.
Amounts to be paid to us by the factor for any accounts receivable are offset by any amounts
previously advanced by the factor. The interest rate is prime plus 1.5%, annually, subject to a
5.5% floor. In certain circumstances, an additional 1.0% annually is charged for advances against
inventory.
Manufacturers require us to present a letter of credit, or pay cash in advance, in order to
manufacture the products required under a purchase order. We utilize letters of credit either from
a finance company or our factor. The finance company charges 1.5% of the purchase order amount for
each transaction for 30 days, plus administrative fees. Our factor provides purchase order
financing at a cost of 0.5% of the purchase order amount for each transaction for 30 days.
Additional charges are incurred if letters of credit remain outstanding in excess of the original
time period and/or the financing company is not paid at the time the products are received. When
our liquidity position allows, we will pay cash in advance instead of utilizing purchase order
financing. This results in reduced financing and administrative fees associated with purchase order
financing.
Advances from Customers. On a case by case basis, distributors and other customers have agreed
to provide us with cash advances on their orders. These advances are then applied against future
sales to these customers. In exchange for these advances, we offer these customers beneficial
pricing or other considerations.
Contingencies and Commitments. We do not currently have any material commitments with respect
to any capital expenditures.
As of April 30, 2010, we had no open letters of credit for inventory purchases to be delivered
during the subsequent quarter.
We are committed under agreements with certain developers and content providers for milestone
and license fee payments aggregating $7.1 million, which are payable within the next 12 months.
As of April 30, 2010, we were committed under operating leases for office space for
approximately $1.3 million through January 31, 2015.
At times, we may be a party to routine claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. In
the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such routine
claims would not have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition, and
results of operations or liquidity.
21
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of April 30, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $11.5 million as of April 30, 2010 compared to $11.8 million at
October 31, 2009. Working capital as of April 30, 2010 was $14.6 million compared to $11.8 million
at October 31, 2009.
Operating Cash Flows. Our principal operating source of cash is from the sales of our
interactive entertainment products. Our principal operating uses of cash are for payments
associated with third-party developers of our software, costs incurred to manufacture, sell and
market our video games and general and administrative expenses.
For the six months ended April 30, 2010, we generated approximately $4.6 million in cash flow
from operating activities, compared to $6.4 million in the previous year. The decrease was
primarily due to decreased operating income, partially offset by increased cash from the change in
working capital accounts. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, sources of cash from seasonal
reductions in our inventory balances were offset by reduced accounts payable and accrued expenses.
During the six months ended April 30, 2009, sources of cash from seasonal reductions in our
inventory balances, and increases in royalties payable, were offset by increases in amounts due
from our factor.
Investing Cash Flows. Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended April 30,
2010 and 2009 were primarily related to purchases of computer equipment and leasehold improvements.
Financing Cash Flows. Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended April 30,
2010 and 2009 consists primarily of cash used to reduce outstanding borrowings under our purchase
order financing agreement, which was used to finance seasonal inventory purchases.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Not Applicable.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of the end of the period
covered by this report.
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that
any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
While we believe our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over
financial reporting are adequate, no system of controls can prevent errors and fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system
must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur. Controls
can also be circumvented by individual acts of some people, by collusion of two or more people, or
by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any
design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of
compliance with its policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective
control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
22
Table of Contents
Subject to the limitations above, management believes that the consolidated financial
statements and other financial information contained in this report, fairly present in all material
respects our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented.
Based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were effective at a
reasonable assurance level.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
our most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
23
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
A description of the risks associated with our business, financial condition, and results of
operations is set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2009. These factors continue to be meaningful for your evaluation of the Company
and we urge you to review and consider the risk factors presented in the Form 10-K. There have been
no material changes to these risks.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
#10.1 | Confidential License Agreement for the Wii Console (Western Hemisphere), effective February 21, 2007, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company. | ||
#10.2 | First Amendment to the Confidential License Agreement for the Wii Console (Western Hemisphere), effective January 4, 2010, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company. | ||
#10.3 | Add On Content Addendum to the Confidential License Agreement for the Wii Console, effective November 2, 2009, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company. | ||
#10.4 | Confidential License Agreement for Nintendo DS (Western Hemisphere), effective May 1, 2005, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company. | ||
#10.5 | First Amendment to the Confidential License Agreement for Nintendo DS (Western Hemisphere), effective April 30, 2008, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company. | ||
#10.6 | Letter Agreement re: Game Publishing for Nintendo DSI, dated February 25, 2009, by and between Nintendo of America Inc. and Majesco Entertainment Company. | ||
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
# We have
requested confidential treatment of certain provisions contained in
this exhibit. The copy filed as an exhibit omits the information
subject to the confidentiality request.
24
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
/s/ Jesse Sutton | ||||
Jesse Sutton | ||||
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: June 14, 2010
25