PwrCor, Inc. - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)

STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In this annual report, references to “Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation,” “CSEI,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Cornerstone Program Advisors LLC and Sustainable Energy Industries, Inc.

Except for the historical information contained herein, some of the statements in this Report contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are found in the sections entitled “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” and “Risk Factors.” They include statements concerning: our business strategy; expectations of market and customer response; liquidity and capital expenditures; future sources of revenues; expansion of our proposed product line; and trends in industry activity generally. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “could,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “goal,” or “continue” or similar terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, but not limited to, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors,” that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For example, assumptions that could cause actual results to vary materially from future results include, but are not limited to: our ability to successfully develop and market our products to customers; our ability to generate customer demand for our products in our target markets; the development of our target markets and market opportunities; our ability to manufacture suitable products at competitive cost; market pricing for our products and for competing products; the extent of increasing competition; technological developments in our target markets and the development of alternate, competing technologies in them; and sales of shares by existing shareholders. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Unless we are required to do so under federal securities laws or other applicable laws, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

3

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

We are a Delaware corporation whose principal office is located at 60 E. 42nd Street, 46th Floor, New York, NY. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we”, “us”, “our”, or “the Company” as used herein refer to Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and our subsidiaries, Cornerstone Program Advisors LLC and Sustainable Energy Industries, Inc. (“Sustainable”).  The Company does business as Cornerstone Sustainable Energy.

Description of the Business

The Company specializes in delivering energy infrastructure and alternative energy solutions to a range of commercial customers and to institutions such as hospitals and universities.  The Company has begun to expand and transform its business to take advantage of opportunities in the alternative energy and clean energy arenas.

The Company has two major business components.  The first major business component is the management of infrastructure projects for commercial and institutional customers.  These projects typically involve some combination of energy infrastructure components, including electrical power generation, steam production, or chilled water production, as well as the infrastructure to distribute these services.  Generally, the Company acts as the representative of the customer in overseeing and managing an infrastructure project, or can take the role of project developer under an agreement with the customer.  The Company has competitors, some of which are very large and well-recognized, but, in the non-profit hospital and university market in its geographical scope of operation, has developed a reputation for excellence and an established market position.  The Company operates in this first business component under its subsidiary, Cornerstone Program Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Cornerstone”), which it acquired in a merger on May 15, 2013 (the “Merger”).

The second major business component is the anticipated commercialization of engine technology which converts low-grade heat to mechanical energy.  The Company is actively marketing the technology particularly for power generation.  While the Company has not yet manufactured or deployed an engine specifically configured for power generation, it has engineered such an engine, has existing engines it is using for testing and demonstration purposes, and has received its initial order for a demonstration engine.  The technology is non-polluting and entirely “green.” Management believes, based on knowledge of the industry, that it is arguably superior to all other lower-temperature engine technologies, such as those utilizing the organic Rankine physical cycle, and operates at lower temperature ranges and heat flow volume than any others in the market.  The engines in this configuration promise to deliver substantial cost savings in most client applications, and are not unusually costly as compared to competing technologies.  Although the engine is readily built to order of common parts and components, a material investment may be required by the Company.  The Company has begun to generate initial revenues through this business component.

The Company also has a smaller business component focused on initiatives in the financial markets.  One initiative offers to assist in arranging funding of infrastructure projects, arranging leasing and other financing arrangements for engines, and participations in power purchase agreements from developed projects, all designed to generate fees and obtain financial participations.  The Company has the capability of arranging favorable financing for projects involving non-profits.  The other initiative supports the run-off of the pre-Merger business of the Company, involving collections on a remaining portfolio of non-performing consumer and commercial receivables.  The Company has generated minimal revenues through this business component.

The Company’s primary markets are (i) large domestic non-profit institutions and organizations, particularly where electricity rates are high, and currently localized in the Northeast; (ii) the waste-heat-to-energy and geothermal marketplace primarily in the Western Hemisphere, typically power generation; and (iii) the independent power producer market, primarily domestic but extending through the Western Hemisphere.  All of these markets are large and multifaceted with no dominant customers.

Cornerstone is an energy infrastructure project management company focused on healthcare and higher learning institutions.  Sustainable is focused on the alternative energy business, with an emphasis on its licensed “green” engine technology.

4

Prior to 2013, the Company was in the business of acquiring portfolios of performing, sub-performing and non-performing consumer and commercial receivables.  The Company is no longer in this business.

Strategy

The Company is pursuing 3 growth initiatives:

(1)  Acquiring and applying “cleantech solutions” - technology, equipment and methods to solve client needs and provide a competitive advantage, such as cleantech engine technology.  In the first such acquisition, the Company merged with the holder of manufacturing and sales rights for the engine technology described above.  The Company has an exclusive manufacturing agreement for this engine with one of the country’s premier engineering and engine manufacturing companies.

(2)  Making strategic acquisitions and entering into strategic joint ventures in and around its core areas of expertise.  The first of these was in cleantech, described directly above.  Other potential acquisition or merger targets are continually under review.  They must meet rigorous financial and growth criteria, offer a strategic fit, and expand the market or competitive position of the Company. Targets include those in the clean water, bio incineration, waste heat recovery, and clean engine technologies.

(3)  Establishing and leveraging alliances, a number of which are established or in some level of development.  We also intend to source business by helping companies offer a uniquely competitive financing and development platform to existing and prospective non-profit clients such as universities, hospitals and municipalities.

For the most part, power technologies are well known and widely available.  The Company is focused on selecting the right technology or technologies for each project, and maintaining a constant focus on both cost effectiveness for the client and financial returns to the Company.  To enhance its competitive position, however, the Company will focus on obtaining exclusive market positions and enhancing its technological strengths.

Industry Overview

The general marketplace for the Company’s offerings is composed of large consumers and producers of power which have an interest in (a) reducing energy consumption, (b) reducing the cost of energy, (c) improving the environmental profile of their energy production, or (d) some combination of these.  The Company is engaged in this overall energy infrastructure industry at two separate points.  These sub-industries, or markets, are relatively distinct, albeit related, so each will be described separately.

One market is composed of consumers of large amounts of energy, including large hospitals, colleges and universities. These institutions often operate large, and frequently aging, centralized utility plant and infrastructure installations which provide heat (typically steam), cooling (chilled water), and power to a sizeable campus of buildings. Energy infrastructure upgrades and improvements are often required to provide for expansion of campus facilities, replace aging equipment, and reduce the cost and/or the amount of their energy consumption.  The Company, acting as the client’s representative, helps design and develop upgrades to or replacements of such facilities, and then oversees the implementation projects for these institutions. The Company may act as project developer or co-developer, and offers to arrange or assist in the project financing.  Projects are typically multi-year commitments and often complex.

The other market is the waste-heat-to-energy industry.  The industry involves technologies for converting wasted heat or geothermal heat to power production.   One example is the enormous and largely unexploited low-grade geothermal market.  Vast geothermal resources are currently untapped because earlier technologies were incapable of converting low-grade heat and low volume heat flows into power.  The Company has a technology that can be utilized to convert this enormous natural resource into baseload power.

5

Technology Market, License and Agreements

The waste-heat-to-energy market, typical of the power production industry, relies heavily on experience, and the Company’s technology is relatively new and has little track record.  However, the scale of the available resource is so sizeable that there is a great deal of interest in developing it. The market potential has not been accurately measured because no technology existed to develop it.  However, it is estimated that the energy available from lower temperature geothermal resources is a multiple of the energy tapped at higher temperature levels.  The geothermal market in the U.S. alone has approximately 3200MW of installed capacity.  Almost all the added capacity increase in the past two decades has utilized lower temperature resources, yet not as low as those at which the Company’s technology can operate.  Currently, an additional 4300MW is in some stage of development, representing an anticipated investment of some $13-$17 billion.  Although the Company’s technology can be configured to operate in the entire range of temperatures, its prime market is in these untapped lower temperature resources.  This is in addition to a related market opportunity for adding this technology to capture waste heat from existing higher-temperature geothermal plants in a “bottoming cycle”, enabling them to increase output from an already-tapped resource.

The Company's technology is also well suited to the waste heat recovery market as related to industries that create wasted heat as a result of their manufacturing or production processes.  This market is well defined and, according to a recent report published by the U.S. Department of Energy, “The United States industrial sector accounts for approximately one third of all energy used in the United States, consuming approximately 32 quadrillion (million billion) BTUs of energy annually and emitting about 1,680 million metric tons of carbon dioxide associated with this energy use.”  The opportunity in the waste heat recovery market is substantial.  The report continues, “A valuable alternative approach to improving overall energy efficiency is to capture and reuse the lost or ‘waste heat’ that is intrinsic to all industrial manufacturing. During these manufacturing processes, as much as 20% to 50% of the energy consumed is ultimately lost via waste heat contained in streams of hot exhaust gases and liquids, as well as through heat conduction, convection, and radiation from hot equipment surfaces and from heated product streams.  In some cases, such as industrial furnaces, waste heat recovery can improve energy efficiency by 10% to as much as 50%.”

The advantage of recapturing and utilizing waste heat is that it typically replaces purchased electric power, much of which does and will continue to require burning fossil fuels, or directly replaces fuels which must be purchased and combusted.  Thus it actually can directly reduce emissions and eliminate transmission losses.  Projections of market potential are truly enormous, with unrecovered waste heat in industrial processes estimated at half a quintillion (billion billion) BTUs.

On December 11, 2010, Sustainable Energy LLC, a New York limited liability company (“Sustainable LLC”), entered into an Original Equipment Manufacturer Supply and Marketing and Sales Agreement with Deluge, Inc. (“Deluge”), and on November 15, 2012, entered into an Engine Technology License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Deluge (the “Licensor”) and an Intellectual Property Owner Agreement with Hydrotherm Power Corporation (“Hydrotherm”) (collectively the “Contracts”).  On May 15, 2013, Sustainable LLC assigned each of the Contracts to Sustainable, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to which Deluge and Hydrotherm had consented on May 11, 2013.

The License Agreement is a renewable 20-year agreement for an engine technology capable of converting low grade heat into other forms of energy.  Under the terms of the Contracts, the Company obtained certain exclusive license rights in the engines developed by the Licensor which will permit the Company to develop, manufacture and integrate such engines into its projects.

In performing due diligence on Deluge and Hydrotherm, the Company subsequently learned that two United States patents that are owned by Hydrotherm and were licensed to the Company under the Contracts had been classified as expired due to Hydrotherm’s failure to pay maintenance fees thereon.  In conjunction with the Licensor, in April 2015, the Company arranged for the principal United States patent to be reinstated, and it is now again in effect.

Pursuant to the Contracts, the Company has obtained previously described rights to all forms of intellectual property covering certain engine technology that is the subject of the Contracts and is not relying solely on the patent in order to maintain the rights to use such technology.  However, at this time, there can be no assurance that the foregoing matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations.

6

The Company branded this engine technology “PwrCor™”. The Company has an exclusive manufacturing agreement for an engine based on this technology with one of the country’s premier engineering and engine manufacturing companies.

On December 27, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Modoc County, California, to supply its PwrCor™ engine as part of a demonstration project that will convert ultra low-grade heat into electricity. The heat will be obtained from a geothermal hot spring which comes to the surface at temperatures of approximately 190° F.

Funding was arranged by Modoc County via a grant from the California Energy Commission with the Company entitled to revenues of up to $123,624 while being responsible for expenses of up to $54,000.  The project will be managed by Warner Mountain Energy, which specified the PwrCor™ engine, and is expected to be completed in the summer of 2017.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had four full-time consultants as officers under consulting agreements with Tom Telegades, the CEO and interim CFO; Peter Fazio, the COO; Wallace Baker, the Chief Administrative Officer; and James Valentino, the non-executive Chairman; and no part-time employees.  See Item 11 “Executive Compensation” below.  Carefully selected contractors are used for managing infrastructure projects, matched to the needs of these clients.  Their staffing levels vary depending on the number and size of infrastructure projects underway.  The Company prefers to outsource non-core, non-critical activities wherever possible, including manufacturing activities.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The Company is not required to provide the information called for in this item due to its status as a Smaller Reporting Company.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company maintains its headquarters office at 60 E. 42nd Street, 46th Floor, New York, NY 10165. The Company leases facilities for executive and administrative purposes in New York City and nearby suburbs on an as-needed basis for a total at year end 2016 of approximately $4,600 a month.  No leases exceed one year in duration.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings or a proceeding being contemplated by a governmental authority nor is any of the Company’s property the subject of any pending legal proceedings or a proceeding being contemplated by a governmental authority.

Other Proceedings

In connection with a November 5, 2013, proceeding commenced by the Securities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission (the “ACC”) the Company learned that each of Deluge and Hydrotherm were classified as dissolved by the Delaware Division of Corporations after March 1, 2010 for failure to pay franchise taxes to the State of Delaware, and similarly classified by the ACC as of approximately the same time.  Neither the Company nor any of its officers or directors was named in the complaint brought by the ACC.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES  

None.

7

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, trades on the OTC Markets under the symbol “CSEI”.  The Company changed its symbol from “RCVA” to “CSEI” in November 2013 as a result of the change of the Company’s business because of the Merger.  The Company’s common stock had been quoted on the OTC Markets under the symbol “RCVA” since October 2004.

The last reported price as of March 6, 2017 was $0.13 per share.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for our common stock for the periods indicated as reported by OTC Markets:

Holders

As of March 6, 2017 there were 249 holders of record of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and may not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies.

Dividends

The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock, and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends to stockholders in the foreseeable future. In addition, any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon the financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant.

Equity Compensation Plans

The following table contains information about the Company’s common stock that may be issued under its equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016. See “Executive Compensation-Benefit Plans” for a description of these stock option and incentive plans.

8

(1) Our 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan was adopted by our stockholders on or about July 12, 2013.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “expect” and the like, and/or future tense or conditional constructions (“will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc.), or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this report. The Company’s actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.

Overview

On May 15, 2013, Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) completed the acquisition of Cornerstone Program Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Cornerstone”) and Sustainable Energy Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Sustainable”), and assumed the operations of each of these entities (the “Merger”).  Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation had operated as a business purchasing and collecting upon defaulted consumer receivables and its operations were spun off by the Company.  Cornerstone has been in the business of managing energy infrastructure projects, specializing in the non-profit marketplace.  Sustainable is in the business of developing, marketing, and implementing clean tech technologies.  The Company is focused on managing energy infrastructure projects and developing applications for a licensed, environmentally benign heat engine with particular focus on the geothermal and waste-heat-to-energy production markets.

Cornerstone was considered to be the “acquiring entity” in the Merger strictly from an accounting perspective.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2016 as compared with December 31, 2015.

Revenue

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had a net loss of ($23,828) on revenues of $945,619, versus a net loss of ($56,421) on revenue of $1,163,211 in the year ended December 31, 2015.  Net operations in 2016 were somewhat improved in contrast to last year due principally to a decline in the cost of consulting fees paid greater than the decline in revenues.

9

The margin of project management revenue over the corresponding cost of subcontracted consultants for such projects has remained steady from 2015 to 2016.  The gross profit for that activity for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately 19% of project management revenues, essentially unchanged from 2015.

The revenue decrease for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the prior year was a consequence of an expected temporary hiatus on one client’s activity.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $969,447, versus $1,219,632 during the year ended December 31, 2015.  The 20.5% decrease in operating expenses in 2016 as compared with 2015 is primarily due to a decrease in the payments to subcontracted consultants related to the reduced project activity.

General and Administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $150,418, versus $156,999 during the year ended 2015.  This change was not considered significant.  Legal and other professional fees increased to $92,286 in 2016 from $78,303 in 2015 as the Company prepared for various charter amendments and for the shareholder meeting for which they were proposed.

Consulting Expenses

The Company outsources a significant portion of its project management, oversight and advisory activities to a carefully selected group of small firms and subcontractors with expertise specific to the projects underway.  As of the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company was using six such consulting resources. Consulting expenses consistently constitute the bulk of operating costs for the project advisory and management business activities of the Company, and accordingly generally track revenue.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had working capital of $62,348 versus a working capital deficit of ($119,672) as of year ended December 31, 2015.  Most of this change is due to a reclassification of the outstanding obligation to the Licensor.  On a comparable basis, at year end 2016 the Company would have had a working capital deficit of ($124,652).

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had net cash of $90,764 as compared with $119,167 at December 31, 2015. At the end of 2016, net cash provided (used) by operating activities was $(33,403) as compared with $52,498 at December 31, 2015.  The decrease in net cash from operating activities was primarily due to a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

At the end of 2016, there was $5,000 net cash provided by financing activities versus $17,500 during 2015.  This was primarily due to a moderate decline in the sales of stock to investors.

In December, the Company completed the bulk of its work on the planning phase of the major infrastructure project at the customer which accounted for the smaller portion of revenues, and is engaged in only limited activity there at this time.  An implementation phase is expected to begin in the near future, but no date has been set, and there is no assurance that the Company will be selected to manage that phase.

The Company believes that funds generated from operations, together with existing cash and cash infusions by major stockholders, will be sufficient to finance its operations for the next twelve months, but are likely to be insufficient to fund growth.  The Company expects to seek additional capital to cover any working capital needs and its contractual obligation discussed below, and to fund growth initiatives in its identified markets.  However, there can be no assurance that any new debt or equity financing arrangement will be available to the Company when needed on acceptable terms, if at all.  The continued operations of the Company are dependent on its ability to collect its receivables and increase revenues.

10

Income Taxes

The Company has paid modest income taxes to New Jersey, New York State and New York City, but does not expect any material income tax liability for the period ended December 31, 2016.

Contractual Obligations

Under the terms of the License Agreement described above, a payment of $200,000 and escalating volume-related quarterly payments are required in order to maintain certain exclusive markets.  If the expected revenues do not materialize, the Company may elect not to pay these sums, and in the event of such non-payment, the Company retains a non-exclusive license subject to royalty fees.  To date, $13,000 has been funded against the License Agreement (see Footnote 4 to the financial statements).

Separately, as noted in Item 1 above, the Company has signed an agreement with the County of Modoc, California, committing the Company to provide an engine to convert ultra low-grade heat from a geothermal resource into electricity during 2017.

Critical Accounting Policy & Estimates

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section discusses our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, accrued expenses, financing operations, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements include estimates as to the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources and our consideration of going concern. These accounting policies are described at relevant sections in this discussion and analysis and in the financial statements included in this annual report.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not required.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

11

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purposes of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amount and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements, approximately 95% and 70% of total revenues for years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were from one unaffiliated customer.

/s/ PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP

New York, NY

March 6, 2017

F-1

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Balance Sheet

See notes to financial statements

F-2

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Statement of Operations

See notes to financial statements

F-3

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016

See notes to financial statements

F-4

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Statement of Cash Flows

See notes to financial statements

F-5

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016

1. Organization and Nature of Business

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation (the “Company” or “RAMCO”), a public reporting entity, was in the business to purchase, manage and collect defaulted consumer receivables. RAMCO ceased investments in distressed consumer credit portfolios in September 2007 and since then was in the process of running off existing portfolios.

Sustainable Energy LLC (“Sustainable LLC”) is a New York limited liability company formed on July 26, 2010. Sustainable LLC is involved in developing and improving the efficiency of energy infrastructure using a combination of traditional and advanced technologies. On March 29, 2013, Sustainable LLC contributed certain assets and liabilities into a newly formed entity, Sustainable Energy Industries, Inc. (“Sustainable”). At the time, Sustainable LLC had a license agreement with a third party involving manufacturing and licensing, and limited assets, liabilities and operations.

Cornerstone Program Advisors LLC, (“Cornerstone”) is a Delaware limited liability company formed on January 5, 2009. Cornerstone is an energy infrastructure project management company focused on healthcare and higher learning institutions.

As a result of a reverse merger acquisition between the Company, Cornerstone, and Sustainable during 2013, the Company adopted a business plan to build on the businesses of Cornerstone and Sustainable in energy infrastructure and alternative energy.

The Company currently does business as Cornerstone Sustainable Energy.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Some of the more significant estimates required to be made by management include valuation of shares issued for services, recognition of income for work completed and unbilled to customers, the allowance for doubtful accounts, and the valuation of the License Agreement. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company believes that funds generated from operations, together with existing cash and cash infusions by major stockholders, will be sufficient to finance its operations for the next twelve months, but are likely to be insufficient to fund growth.  The Company expects to seek additional capital to cover any working capital needs and its contractual obligations, and to fund growth initiatives in its identified markets. However, there can be no assurance that any new debt or equity financing arrangement will be available to the Company when needed on acceptable terms, if at all.  The continued operations of the Company are dependent on its ability to raise funds, collect accounts receivable, and receive revenues.

Cash

The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions it invests with. From time to time, however, the Company briefly maintains balances in operating accounts in excess of federally insured limits.

F-6

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Accounts Receivable

Receivables are stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. Management provides for probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to a valuation allowance based on its assessment of the current status of individual accounts. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, no allowance for doubtful accounts had been provided.

Income Recognition

The Company recognizes income from the sale of services and products when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and the collectability of the related income is reasonably assured.

The Company principally derives income from fees for services generated on a project-by-project basis. Prior to the commencement of a project, the Company reaches an agreement with the client on rates for services based upon the scope of the project, staffing requirements and the level of client involvement. It is the Company’s policy to obtain written agreements from new clients prior to performing services. In these agreements, the clients acknowledge that they will pay based upon the amount of time spent on the project or an agreed-upon fee structure. Income for services rendered is recognized on a time and materials basis or on a fixed-fee or capped-fee basis in accordance with accounting and disclosure requirements for income recognition.

Fees for services that have been performed, but for which the Company has not invoiced the customers, are recorded as unbilled receivables.

Income for time and materials contracts is recognized based on the number of hours worked by the Company’s subcontractors at an agreed upon rate per hour, and are recognized in the period in which services are performed. Income for time and materials contracts is billed monthly or in accordance with the specific contractual terms of each project.

Income from engine sales contracts is recognized under the percentage-of-completion accounting method.  The percentage completed is measured by the cost incurred to date compared to the estimated total cost on each contract.  This method is used as management considers expended cost to be the best available measure of progress on these contracts, which are expected to be completed within one year.  Inherent uncertainties in estimating costs make it at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change within the near term and over the lives of the respective contracts.  Deferred income represents the net amount due, or received, under contract terms in excess of the work completed to date.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are being depreciated on the straight line basis over a period of five years.  Accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $7,406 and $3,174, respectively.

License Agreement

The cost of the License Agreement (see Note 4) is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years.  The License Agreement is reflected in the accompanying December 31, 2016 balance sheet net of accumulated amortization.  The license agreement is tested annually for impairment or earlier if an indication of impairment exists.  The Company believes that the license agreement is not impaired at December 31, 2016.

F-7

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by the tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Company’s tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years (2013 - 2015).

Basic and Diluted Net (Loss) per Share

The Company computes income (loss) per share in accordance with “ASC-260”, “Earnings per Share” which requires presentation of both basic and diluted income (loss) per share on the face of the statement of operations. Basic (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares during the period. Diluted (loss) per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive income (loss) per share excludes all potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

The Company has no potential dilutive instruments and accordingly basic (loss) and diluted (loss) per share are the same.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09: “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model requiring a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In adopting ASU 2014-09, companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2014-09 during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Management is evaluating the provisions of this statement and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15: “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”). In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company has adopted ASU 2014-15, and accordingly management has assessed its ability to meet its obligations as they become due over the next twelve months.  Based on management’s assessment of the Company’s expected future revenue and expenses, management believes the Company can continue to operate as a going concern.

All other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.

F-8

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated subsequent events for disclosure and/or recognition in the financial statements through the date that the financial statements were available to be issued.

3. Related Party Transactions

Consulting Fees

Certain stockholders of the Company and entities affiliated with management that perform services for customers were compensated at various rates. Total consulting expenses incurred by these entities amounted to $539,118 and $719,240 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  Amounts payable to these entities amounted to $168,349 and $249,372 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Prepaid Expenses

Amounts were advanced in 2015 and 2016 to a consultant, who is also a stockholder and officer of the Company, for work committed to be performed in future periods under a contract with that consultant.  These advances totaled $13,500 in 2015 and $7,500 in 2016.

4. License Agreement

From late 2010 through November 15, 2012, Sustainable LLC entered into a series of agreements including a renewable 20-year engine technology License Agreement (the Contracts) with a third party licensor (the “Licensor”) that developed engines capable of converting low grade heat into other forms of energy.  Under the terms of the License Agreement, Sustainable LLC obtained certain exclusive license rights in the engines developed by the Licensor which would permit Sustainable LLC to develop, manufacture and integrate such engines into its projects.

The exclusive market rights of the License Agreement provide that Sustainable LLC make a cash payment of $200,000 for this exclusivity and issue common stock representing a small minority ownership position in the Company, along with periodic quarterly payments of $25,000 commencing six months after the initial $200,000 payment.  These payments reset to $50,000 per quarter after three payments, and are subject to further resets to up to $100,000 depending on engine sales volume.  Under certain circumstances, engine royalty fees and referral fees can increase the quarterly payment from time to time.  In the event of non-payment, Sustainable retains a non-exclusive license subject to royalty fees.

On May 15, 2013, in connection with the Merger (see Note 1), Sustainable LLC assigned the Contracts to Sustainable.  The Company, after acquiring 100% ownership interest in Sustainable, issued 2,435,430 shares to the Licensor which represents the small minority position in the Company as required under the terms of the License Agreement. At the time of issuance, these shares were valued at $48,709 representing the fair value of the RAMCO shares.

In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company made payments of $13,000 that were applied against the initial $200,000 due under the terms of the License Agreement.

In the event the Company elects not to pay for exclusivity under the Technology Agreement, no cash payment or periodic increasing payments are due. During 2016, management has considered the nature of the $187,000 exclusive payment and determined that a more accurate presentation on the balance sheet is to net the contingent liability with the license agreement asset. Thus the contingent amount due, $187,000, has been netted against the amortized value of the License Agreement. The comparative 2015 presentation continues to reflect the asset and contingent liability on a gross basis.

F-9

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016

4. License Agreement (continued)

In connection with the November 5, 2013, proceeding described above (see Item 3) commenced by the Securities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission (“ACC”), the Company learned that the Licensor had been classified as dissolved by the Delaware Division of Corporations after March 1, 2010 for failure to pay franchise taxes to the State of Delaware, and similarly classified by the ACC as of approximately the same time.

In performing due diligence in regard to the status of the Licensor, the Company subsequently also learned that two United States patents that were licensed to the Company under the License Agreement had been classified as expired due to the Licensor’s failure to pay maintenance fees.  In conjunction with the Licensor, in April 2015, the Company arranged for the principal United States patent to be reinstated, and it is now again in effect.  In addition, the Company had been informed by Deluge and Hydrotherm management that steps were being taken to have the corporate charters of each corporation reinstated, but may not be successful.

Since the Company learned about the Delaware actions and ACC proceedings, it has suspended payments under the License Agreement pending the resolution of this matter.

To the best of the Company’s knowledge at present, none of these issues presents a near-term hindrance to the Company’s continued focus on establishing and growing its engine technology business and the international patent rights remain intact.  However, even though the Company has obtained previously described rights to all forms of intellectual property covering the engine technology that is the subject of the Contracts, at this time there can be no assurance that the foregoing matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations.

The accompanying December 31, 2016 balance sheet presents the carrying value of the license fee at $21,094, consisting of the $13,000 in licensing payments made under the License Agreement and $48,709, representing the fair value of shares issued to the Licensor, net of $40,615 in accumulated amortization.  The carrying value of the License Agreement at December 31, 2015 includes the $187,000 contingent payment and is reflected net of accumulated amortization of $31,000.  After careful assessment, the Company has concluded that no adjustment to the value of the Contracts should be made as a consequence of the Delaware actions and ACC complaint at the current time, but continues to monitor these proceedings.

The Company periodically performs an analysis of its contractual rights and arrangements and establishes asset value based on that analysis.

5. Concentrations

The Company grants credit in the normal course of business to its customers.  The Company periodically performs credit analysis and monitors the financial condition of its customers to reduce credit risk.

Two customers accounted for 95.1% and 3.8% of the Company’s total income during the year ended December 31, 2016, and the same two customers accounted for 70.3% and 29.7% during the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively.

These two customers accounted for 81.9% and 2.3% of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 and for 43.9% and 56.1% respectively at December 31, 2015.

In addition, 14.4% of total receivables at December 31, 2016 were due to the Company from the County of Modoc, California upon the signing of an agreement to supply an engine as part of a project there (see Note 7).

F-10

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016

6. Stock Issuance

The Company issued 227,273 shares of Common Stock, at market price, to a single investor during the third quarter of 2016 for a cash investment of $5,000.  All shares issued are restricted securities.

7. Commitments

Consultants

The Company entered into an agreement with Thomas Telegades, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company, under which Mr. Telegades shall serve on a full-time basis as Chief Executive Officer for a three year term beginning on May 15, 2013, which was renewed on May 15, 2016. The agreement specifies that Mr. Telegades shall be paid annual compensation of up to $150,000 for his services. The agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which expire the later of three years from May 15, 2016, or one year following his termination or voluntary resignation.

The Company entered into an agreement with Peter Fazio, the Chief Operating Officer and Director of the Company, under which Mr. Fazio shall serve on a full-time basis as Chief Operating Officer of the Company for a three year term beginning on May 15, 2013, which was renewed on May 15, 2016.  The agreement specifies that Mr. Fazio shall be paid annual compensation of up to $150,000 for his services. The agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which expire the later of three years from May 15, 2016, or one year following his termination or voluntary resignation.

The Company entered into an agreement with Gramercy Ventures LLC (“Gramercy”), under which the manager of Gramercy, James Valentino, who is also one of the directors of the Company, serves on a full-time basis as consultant to and non-executive Chairman of the Board of the Company for a three year term beginning on July 1, 2014.  The agreement specifies that Gramercy shall be paid an annual compensation of up to $150,000 for such services.  This agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which expire the later of three years from July 1, 2014, or one year following his termination or voluntary resignation.

The Company entered into an agreement with Wallace Baker, a director of the Company, under which Mr. Baker serves on a full-time basis as Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary of the Company for a three year term beginning on July 1, 2014.  The agreement specifies that Mr. Baker shall be paid annual compensation of up to $150,000 for his services.  This agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which expire the later of three years from July 1, 2014, or one year following his termination or voluntary resignation.

For 2016 and 2015, no amounts were paid to these officers nor were any amounts accrued.

Engine Agreement

On December 27, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Modoc County, California, to supply its PwrCor™ engine as part of a demonstration project that will convert ultra low-grade heat into electricity.  The heat will be obtained from a geothermal hot spring which comes to the surface at temperatures of approximately 190° F.

Funding was arranged by Modoc County via a grant from the California Energy Commission with the Company entitled to revenues of up to $123,624 while being responsible for expenses of up to $54,000.  The project will be managed by Warner Mountain Energy, which specified the PwrCor™ engine, and is expected to be completed in the summer of 2017.

F-11

Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016

8. Income Taxes

There was no provision for income tax for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.  The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return.

The difference between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting are not considered material.  There were approximately $870,000 in net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2016, and approximately $825,000 at December 31, 2015, representing a potential deferred tax asset.  The deferred tax asset amounted to approximately $290,000 and $275,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  For net operating losses prior to the Merger, net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitations as a result of a change in ownership as defined by IRC Section 382.  Upon an assessment of the potential of realizing these deferred tax assets in the future, an offsetting valuation allowance has been established for the full amount of the deferred tax assets.

9. Subsequent Events

On January 20, 2017, the Company held its 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  At the meeting, various matters were submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders, and approved by a very large margin.  These included the election of five (5) directors, including new director Monirul Hoque, to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders; ratification of the appointment of PKF O’Connor Davies LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal year; approval of an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to change the Company’s name to “PwrCor, Inc.”, and approval of a reverse stock split and corresponding amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation.  Advisory votes on executive compensation and the frequency of votes on executive compensation every three years were also approved.

Because the reverse stock split has not yet taken place, share and per share amounts have not been retroactively restated.

F-12

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our principal executive and principal financial officer has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.  He has concluded that, based on such evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016 to ensure that:

(1) Information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commissions’ rules and forms; and

(2) Controls and procedures are designed by the Company to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management including the principal executive and principal financial officers or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding financial disclosure.

This term refers to the controls and procedures of a Company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a Company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Overview

Internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations.  Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures.  Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override.  Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting.  However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process.  Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Management has used the 2013 framework set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

12

Management’s Assessment

Based on this assessment, management has determined that, as of the December 31, 2016 measurement date, there were no material weaknesses in both the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.  Our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We noted that there is a lack of sufficient internal accounting resources and lack of segregation of certain duties at the Company due to the small number of people with responsibility for general administrative and financial matters.  At this time, management has decided that considering the individuals involved and the control procedures in place, the risks associated with such lack of segregation of duties are insignificant and the potential benefits of adding additional resources to clearly segregate duties do not justify the additional expenses associated with such increases.  Additionally, we retain an outside consultant firm to assist in the financial reporting process.  We therefore conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2016. Management will periodically reevaluate this situation. If the volume of business increases and sufficient capital is secured, it is the Company’s intention to mitigate the current lack of segregation of duties within the general, administrative and financial functions.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to final rulings of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act, in 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

13

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Our current directors and officers are listed below. Each of our directors will serve for one year or until their respective successors are elected and qualified. Our officers serve at the pleasure of the Board.

Set forth below is biographical information for each officer and director.

THOMAS TELEGADES was appointed a director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company on May 15, 2013.  Since September 2006, Thomas has served as the managing member of Cornerstone Program Advisors LLC, an energy infrastructure project management company focused on healthcare and higher learning institutions, which became a subsidiary of the Company as a result of the Merger.  Mr. Telegades has an MBA from Fairleigh Dickinson University and has a BAS from Florida Atlantic University.

PETER FAZIO was appointed a director and Chief Operating Officer of the Company on May 15, 2013.  Since June 2008, Peter has served as Chief Executive Officer of Sustainable Energy Industries Inc., and its predecessor Sustainable Energy Industries, LLC an alternative energy business, with emphasis on “green” engine technology, which became a subsidiary of the Company as a result of the Merger.  From February 2009 until February 2011, Mr. Fazio was Vice President of New Construction for Schlesinger/Siemens.  He has more than twenty-five years of experience in sales, management, employee relations, cost control and project management, and will continue in these roles with the Company.

JAMES VALENTINO spent most of his career as an executive in the financial services industry, with experience in marketing, interactive commerce, creative business strategy development and information technology.  More recently, he had over a decade of involvement with growing new businesses.  Mr. Valentino is a patented inventor and was a founder, early backer, influencer, and/or director or board chairman of a number of emerging private companies, notably JibJab.  Mr. Valentino served as Chairman of the Board of MetLife Trust Company, and co-founded and served as Chairman of the Board for eComForum, a Washington, D.C. based e-commerce advocacy group. Mr. Valentino is a graduate of City University-Brooklyn College with a BS degree in Economics and Math, and has completed extensive graduate work at Baruch Business College in Information Technology and Computer Methodology. He is a graduate of the M.I.T. Sloan School Senior Executive Program, where he served on the Board of Governors. He is also a member of the New York Academy of Sciences.  He has been Chairman of the Board of the Company since May 2013.

WALLACE BAKER has served in the capacity of Chief Administrative Officer and director since May 2013.  He spent most of his career in the financial services industry as a financial analyst and an executive focused largely on corporate finance, financial modeling, controls and performance measurement, as well as corporate planning and strategy.  Mr. Baker was a founder of MetLife Trust Company and served on its Board of Directors, and subsequently became involved as a founder, early backer and/or principal in a number of emerging private companies. Mr. Baker has an undergraduate degree in Economics from Brown University, and an MBA in Finance from New York University.  He was elected corporate Secretary in December 2013.

14

MONIRUL HOQUE was elected to the Board in January 2017.  He has over 20 years of experience with global financial services firms including GE Capital, JP Morgan and Bank of America.  Mr. Hoque has been employed by Alliance Global Finance since November 2012, as a Special Situations and Growth Capital Private Equity Investor.  Earlier, he was employed by Sawmill Capital Partners as an Emerging Markets Financial Advisor, by Al Rayan Investments in Doha, Qatar, as Managing Director of the group focused on emerging markets, and by Bank of America Securities where he ran the Principal Financial Real Estate and Infrastructure Strategies Group.  He has worked in investment and corporate banking, private equity, real estate, and asset management, and has extensive experience in investing debt and equity products and their derivatives.  Mr. Hoque earned a master’s degree with honors in Finance from Columbia University. Through a combined degree program, he received a BS in Electrical Engineering from Columbia University and a BA in Physics from Bard College; both degrees were earned with honors.

Messrs. Fazio, Valentino, and Baker gained knowledge of the industry and the engine technology from working with or consulting for the Licensor for a period of time some years ago.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

·

been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

·

had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;

·

been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

·

been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

·

been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

·

been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission.

15

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the Board.

Code of Ethics

As of December 31, 2016, the Company has not adopted a Code of Ethics.

Corporate Governance

The business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of our Board.  The Board has conducted meetings as needed since the Closing of the Merger.  Each of our directors has attended all meetings either in person or via telephone conference.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Our board of directors is primarily responsible for overseeing our risk management processes. The board of directors receives and reviews periodic reports from management, auditors, legal counsel, and others, as considered appropriate regarding the Company’s assessment of risks. The board of directors focuses on the most significant risks facing the Company and the Company’s general risk management strategy, and also ensures that risks undertaken by the Company are consistent with the board’s appetite for risk. While the board oversees our company’s risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing our company and that our board leadership structure supports this approach.

The Company does not have an audit committee, compensation committee or nominating committee.  The board of directors is responsible for all aspects of governance of the Company, including functions that would be delegated to such committees.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock to file with the SEC and the Company reports on Form 4 and Form 5 reflecting transactions affecting beneficial ownership. Based solely on a review of the copies of the reports furnished to us, or written representations that no reports were required to be filed, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors, officers, and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

16

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

[1].

Each of Messrs. Telegades, Fazio, Valentino, and Baker were owed compensation under their respective consulting agreements with the Company as discussed on the next page.  For 2016 and 2015, all of the Company’s officers waived any compensation owed to them under such agreements. No amounts were paid to these officers nor did any amounts accrue.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End

None.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

No executive officer identified in the Summary Compensation Table above received or exercised any option in fiscal year 2016.

17

Benefit Plans

In 2013, the Board adopted and received consent of majority of shareholders for the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “2013 Plan”) and the reservation of an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for issuance pursuant to the 2013 Plan. The 2013 Plan, approved by our stockholders, replaces the Company’s last stock option plan, which was adopted in April 2004, and will be used to help attract, retain and motivate employees, consultants and directors.

The affirmative vote of the Majority Shareholders was required for the approval of the 2013 Plan.

The 2013 Plan is available to employees and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries and members of the Board, or as applicable, members of the board of directors.  The Board believes that the 2013 Plan will promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by continuing to link the personal interests of participants to those of the Company and its stockholders and by providing participants with an incentive for outstanding performance to generate superior returns to our stockholders. The Board further believes that the 2013 Plan will provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract and retain the services of employees, consultants and Directors upon whose judgment, interest and special effort the successful operation of the Company is largely dependent.

The 2013 Plan provides for the grant of stock options (both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options), restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards to eligible participants.

There were no grants of plan-based awards to named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation

The Company does not have any defined contribution or other plan which provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified.

Consulting Agreements

The Company entered into an agreement in 2013 and renewed in 2016 with Thomas Telegades, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company, under which Mr. Telegades shall serve on a full-time basis as Chief Executive Officer for a three year term beginning on May 15, 2016. The agreement specifies that Mr. Telegades shall be paid annual compensation of up to $150,000 for his services. The agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which expire the later of three years from May 15, 2016, or one year following his termination or voluntary resignation.

The Company entered into an agreement in 2013 and renewed in 2016 with Peter Fazio, the Chief Operating Officer and Director of the Company, under which Mr. Fazio shall serve on a full-time basis as Chief Operating Officer of the Company for a three year term beginning on May 15, 2016. The agreement specifies that Mr. Fazio shall be paid annual compensation of up to $150,000 for his services.  The agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which expire the later of three years from May 15, 2016, or one year following his termination or voluntary resignation.

The Company entered into an agreement with Gramercy Ventures LLC (“Gramercy”), under which the manager of Gramercy, James Valentino, who is also one of the directors of the Company, serves on a full-time basis as consultant to and non-executive Chairman of the Board of the Company for a three year term beginning on July 1, 2014. The agreement specifies that Gramercy shall be paid an annual compensation of up to $150,000 for such services. This agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which expire the later of three years from July 1, 2014, or one year following his termination or voluntary resignation.

The Company entered into an agreement with Wallace Baker, a director of the Company, under which Mr. Baker serves on a full-time basis as Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary of the Company for a three year term beginning on July 1, 2014. The agreement specifies that Mr. Baker shall be paid annual compensation of up to $150,000 for his services. This agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions which expire the later of three years from July 1, 2014, or one year following his termination or voluntary resignation.

18

For 2016 and 2015, no amounts were paid to these officers nor did any amounts accrue.

All of our officers and/or directors will continue to be active in other companies. All officers and directors have retained the right to conduct their own independent business interests.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control

None.

Director Compensation Arrangements

Our directors do not receive compensation of any form for serving in this capacity, including for their attendance at meetings of the Board.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the ownership of our common stock as of February 28, 2017, with respect to: (i) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of each class of stock; (ii) all of our directors and executive officers; and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The notes accompanying the information in the table are necessary for a complete understanding of the information provided below. As of February 28, 2017 there were 200,739,432 shares of common stock outstanding.

We believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as being owned by them, except as otherwise provided in the footnotes to the below table.

Under federal securities laws, a person or group of persons is: (a) deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares as of a given date which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date and (b) assumed to have sold all shares registered hereby in this offering. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares held by each person or group of persons named above on a given date, any security which such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date is deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such person or persons, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.   This assumes that options, warrants or convertible securities that are held by such person or group of persons and which are exercisable within 60 days of the date of this report, have been exercised or converted.

(1) Except as otherwise set forth below, the address of each of the persons listed below is c/o Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation, 60 E. 42nd Street, 46th Floor, New York, New York 10165.

(2) Based on 200,739,432 shares of Common Stock as of March 6, 2017.

19

(3) These shares are owned by Semper Fi Energy Holdings, LLC of which Mr. Telegades is a control person.  This number does not include 8,757,827 shares owned by Cornerstone Program Advisors Ltd, an entity owned by Mr. Telegades’ wife.

(4) Consists entirely of Common Stock held by Mosalu Family Trust of which Mr. Fazio is a control person.  Mr. Fazio may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the Common Stock held by the Mosalu Family Trust.

(5)  Includes 28,826,269 shares of Common Stock held by Gramercy Ventures, LLC, of which Mr. Valentino is the manager. Mr. Valentino disclaims beneficial interest of the shares owned by Gramercy Ventures LLC.   This number also includes 500,000 shares of Common Stock held in an IRA owned by Mr. Valentino.

(6) Consists entirely of Common Stock held by Wentworth Dukeshire Trust.  Mr. Baker disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares, as he does not control the power to vote or dispose of these shares.  The trust is controlled by independent trustees.

(7) The address of Stanley and Laurie Altschuler is 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(8) Includes 160,000 shares of Common Stock of which Mr. Khan is legal Custodian and of which Mr. Khan may be deemed to be the beneficial owner.  Mr. Khan was the Chief Executive Officer of the Company until May 15, 2013 and was on the board of directors of the Company until June 26, 2014. The address of Mr. Khan is 732 Pembroke Way, Ridgefield, NJ 07657.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

See Part II, Item 5, “Equity Compensation Plans” for information regarding our equity compensation plans.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Since January 1, 2016, there has not been any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or are a party in which the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the applicable year-end and in which any of our directors or executive officers, any holder of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than the compensation arrangements described in “Executive Compensation” and the transactions set forth below.

In connection with the Merger by and among the Company, Cornerstone, and Sustainable, which was completed May 15, 2013, the Company entered into a voluntary share exchange transaction (the “Exchange”) whereby the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding membership units of Cornerstone and the issued and outstanding shares of Sustainable in exchange for the issuance to the members of Cornerstone and issuance to the shareholders of Sustainable a total of approximately 176,400,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Consideration Shares”).  Prior to the Merger, the Company had approximately 19,600,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.  All of the Common Stock owned by directors Thomas Telegades, Peter Fazio, James Valentino, and Wallace Baker, or by trusts or limited liability companies at their designation, as of December 31, 2016 consists of Consideration Shares that they received in connection with the Merger.

See Part II, Item 11, “Employment Agreements” for information regarding the compensation agreements with the various officers and directors of the Company. For 2016, all of the Company’s officers waived any compensation owed to them under such agreements. No amounts were paid to these officers nor did any amounts accrue.

In 2016, the Company incurred $73,530 in charges to Cornerstone Program Advisors Ltd for various consulting services.  Cornerstone Program Advisors Ltd provided such services to the Company in 2013 after the Merger and did so to Cornerstone prior to the Merger, when it was also a member of Cornerstone.  As noted above, Cornerstone Program Advisors Ltd is wholly-owned by Thomas Telegades’ wife.  Mr. Telegades is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

20

Director Independence

Because our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we have used the definition of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

·

the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an employee of the company;

·

the director or a family member of the director accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $120,000 during any period of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the independence determination (subject to certain exclusions, including, among other things, compensation for board or board committee service);

·

a family member of the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an executive officer of the company;

·

the director or a family member of the director is a partner in, controlling stockholder of, or an executive officer of an entity to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for that year or $200,000, whichever is greater (subject to certain exclusions);

·

the director or a family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of an entity where, at any time during the past three years, any of the executive officers of the company served on the compensation committee of such other entity; or the director or a family member of the director is a current partner of the company’s outside auditor, or at any time during the past three years was a partner or employee of the company’s outside auditor, and who worked on the company’s audit.

Monirul Hoque was elected an independent director of the Company at our January 20, 2017, Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  We do not have an audit committee, compensation committee or nominating committee.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for the Company by PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP (“PKF”), the Company’s Independent Certified Public Accountants, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are set forth below. The aggregate fees included in the Audit category are fees billed for the fiscal years for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements and statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. The aggregate fees included in each of the other categories are fees billed in the fiscal years.

Audit Fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were for professional services rendered for the audits and quarterly reviews of the financial statements of the Company.

As the Company does not have a formal audit committee, the services described above were not approved by the audit committee under the de minimus exception provided by Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) under Regulation S-X.  Further, as the Company does not have a formal audit committee, the Company does not have audit committee pre-approval policies and procedures.  However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

21

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and not filed.

*Filed herewith

**XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of this annual report or purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

(1)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013.

(2)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 21, 2013.

(3)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on July 15, 2013.

(4)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on May 7, 2014.

(5)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 2, 2014.

22

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

23