RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. - Quarter Report: 2007 February (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2007

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 0-32113

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

695 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 600, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626

(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)

(714) 430-6400

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  x    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of March 30, 2007, 49,021,673 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands, except par value per share)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

The Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2007 reflect the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised), “Share-Based Payment” effective with the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2007. The adoption of this standard resulted in an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $5.0 million and $14.4 million and a decrease in the provision for income taxes of $1.0 million and $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2007, respectively. There were no corresponding amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2006 (see notes 2 and 9 to the financial statements).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Nine months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

1. Description of the Company and its Business

Resources Connection, Inc. (“Resources Connection” or the “Company”) was incorporated on November 16, 1998. Resources Connection is a multinational professional services firm; its operating entities provide services under the name Resources Global Professionals (“Resources Global”). Resources Global provides professional services to a variety of industries and enterprises through its subsidiaries. The Company provides clients with experienced professionals who specialize in accounting, finance, information technology, human resources, supply chain management, legal services and internal audit and risk assessment on a project basis. The Company has offices in the United States (“U.S.”), Asia, Australia, Canada, Mexico and Europe. Resources Connection is a Delaware corporation.

The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks, ending on the last Saturday in May. The actual quarter end dates for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and 2006, each consisting of 13 weeks, were February 24, 2007 and February 25, 2006, respectively. For convenience, all references herein to years or periods are to years or periods ended May 31 or February 28, respectively.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Interim Financial Information

The financial information as of and for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 is unaudited but includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that the Company considers necessary for a fair statement of its financial position at such dates and the operating results and cash flows for those periods. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements and certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules or regulations; however, the Company believes the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the fiscal year. These condensed interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2006, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended (File No. 0-32113).

Short and Long-Term Investments

The Company accounts for its marketable securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Accordingly, securities that the Company has the ability and positive intent to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost. Cost approximates market for these securities.

All held-to-maturity securities have remaining maturity dates greater than one year. To secure a higher interest rate on the Company’s investment in government bonds, the $56.0 million in investments classified as long-term as of February 28, 2007 are callable at the discretion of the issuer although their stated maturity dates are greater than one year from the balance sheet date.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective June 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 revised, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123 (R)”) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and employee stock purchases made via the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, to be based on estimated fair values. Prior to that date, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under APB No. 25, the intrinsic value of the options was used to record compensation expense and if the grant price of the options was equal to the fair market value of the option at the date of grant, no compensation expense related to the stock options was included in determining net income and net income per share. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) related to SFAS 123 (R). The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in adopting SFAS 123 (R).

7

Table of Contents

The Company adopted SFAS 123 (R) using the modified prospective method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of June 1, 2006, the beginning of the Company’s 2007 fiscal year. In accordance with the modified prospective method, the Company’s previously issued financial statements have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS 123 (R). Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123 (R) and included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2007 was $5.0 million and $14.4 million, respectively; this consisted of stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options, employee stock purchases made via the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan and issuances of restricted stock. There was no stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and employee stock purchases recognized during the three and nine months ended February 28, 2006.

SFAS 123 (R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods (four years under the Company’s 2004 Performance Incentive Plan). Under both SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), and SFAS 123 (R), the Company determines the estimated fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Under the pro forma information required under SFAS 123 for periods prior to fiscal 2006, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. SFAS 123 (R) requires the Company to recognize expense over the service period for options that are expected to vest and record adjustments to compensation expense at the end of the service period if actual forfeitures differ from original estimates. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis.

See Note 9 – Stock Based Compensation Plans for further information on stock-based compensation expense and the resulting impact on the provision for income taxes.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although management believes these estimates and assumptions are adequate, actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.

Sales Taxes Withheld from Clients

Certain states in the United States and countries throughout the world impose sales tax or value-added taxes on our services. These taxes are treated on a “net basis” that is, they are excluded from our revenues and are included as a part of “Income Taxes Payable and Other Liabilities” in our balance sheet until they are remitted to the applicable taxing authority.

3. Stockholders’ Equity

In October 2002, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, authorizing the repurchase of up to 3.0 million shares of our common stock. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company purchased 600,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of $23.55 per share for a total of approximately $14.1 million. In August 2006, the Board of Directors added the condition that the total expenditure for the remaining 1,460,389 shares of common stock authorized for repurchase not exceed $60.0 million. There were no repurchases of stock during the third quarter of fiscal 2007.

4. Net Income Per Share

The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) amounts in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” This pronouncement establishes standards for the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for EPS for entities with publicly held common shares and potential common shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, calculated using the treasury stock method for stock options. Under the treasury stock method, exercise proceeds include the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future services that the Company has not yet recognized and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the award becomes deductible. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect. Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the average market price over the period are anti-dilutive and are excluded from the calculation.

8

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the calculation of net income per share for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

The potentially dilutive shares presented above do not include the anti-dilutive effect of approximately 3,908,000 and 138,000 potential common shares for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively and 3,559,000 and 160,000 potential common shares for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

5. Acquisition

On August 27, 2004, the Company acquired approximately 80% of the shares of Nordic Spring Management Consulting AB (“Nordic Spring”) of Stockholm, Sweden for $4.6 million. The Company purchased the remaining 20% of the shares of Nordic Spring in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The purchase price of $3.0 million was based on Nordic Spring’s operating income (before interest and depreciation) during the Company’s 2006 fiscal year, and was paid 50% in cash and 50% in the Company’s common stock (65,170 shares).

In accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” the Company will allocate the purchase price of the remaining 20% of the shares of Nordic Spring based on the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As of February 28, 2007, the $3.0 million purchase price has been allocated entirely to goodwill, pending completion of the Company’s valuation study. The Company will consider a number of factors in performing this valuation, including a valuation of the identifiable intangible assets.

6. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The following table presents details of our intangible assets, estimated lives and related accumulated amortization (amounts in thousands):

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill and other intangible assets with indeterminate lives are not subject to amortization but are tested for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Intangible assets with finite lives continue to be subject to amortization, and any impairment is determined in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”

9

Table of Contents

The Company recorded amortization expense of $318,000 and $435,000 for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively and $1.1 million and $1.3 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Estimated intangible asset amortization expense (based on existing intangible assets) for the years ending May 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 is $1,381,000, $382,000 and $36,000, respectively. The amount of future amortization will increase when the Company completes its review of the allocation of the purchase price for the remaining 20% of shares of Nordic Spring; however, the additional amortization expense will not be significant. Amortization of the Company’s existing intangible assets with finite lives will be complete as of the end of fiscal 2009. The change in the balance of goodwill is the result of the purchase of the remaining 20% of the shares of Nordic Spring and the translation of goodwill balances of our non-U.S. based operations at the exchange rate effective at the end of the quarterly period.

7. Segment Reporting

In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company discloses information regarding operations outside of the United States. The Company operates as one segment. The accounting policies for the domestic and international operations are the same as those described in Note 2-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Summarized financial information regarding the Company’s domestic and international operations is shown in the following table (amounts in thousands):

8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an Amendment of FAS 115” (“SFAS 159”), which permits companies to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Under SFAS 159, companies that elect the fair value option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis. SFAS 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements to clarify the effect of a company’s election on its earnings but does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other accounting standards. Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value must be displayed on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue No. 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation).” This EITF requires that companies disclose how they report, within their financial statements, taxes assessed by a governmental authority that involve a specific revenue producing transaction between a seller and a customer. These types of taxes may include, but are not limited to, sales, use, value added and excise taxes. These taxes collected from customers may be presented either on a gross basis (that is, included in revenue and cost of services) or on a net basis (excluded from revenue and cost of services but included as a liability in the balance sheet until the tax has been remitted to the appropriate governmental authority). The Company has historically accounted for such taxes on a net basis and therefore adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-03 in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”), which provides guidance for recognition of a net liability or asset to report the funded status of company defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively referred to herein as “benefit plans”) on company balance sheets. The pronouncement clarifies (1) recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in its statement of

10

Table of Contents

financial position; (2) recognition as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to FASB Statement No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions”, or No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” (3) measurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position (with limited exceptions); and (4) disclosure requirements in the notes to financial statements with additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. SFAS 158 is effective as of the end of our 2007 fiscal year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 158 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The pronouncement clarifies (1) the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value; (2) the information used to measure fair value; and (3) the effect that fair value measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS 157 is effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize the impact of a tax position in its financial statements, if that position will more likely than not be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on its financial statements.

9. Stock Based Compensation Plans

2004 Performance Incentive Plan

On October 15, 2004, the Company’s stockholders approved the Resources Connection, Inc. 2004 Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). This Plan replaces the Company’s 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plan”). Under the terms of the Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors or one or more committees appointed by the Board of Directors will administer the Plan. The Board of Directors has delegated general administrative authority for the Plan to the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

The administrator of the Plan has broad authority under the Plan to, among other things, select participants and determine the type(s) of award(s) that they are to receive, and determine the number of shares that are to be subject to awards and the terms and conditions of awards, including the price (if any) to be paid for the shares or the award.

Persons eligible to receive awards under the Plan include officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, directors of the Company, and certain consultants and advisors to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued or transferred pursuant to awards under the Plan equals the sum of: (1) 4,000,000 shares (after giving effect to the Company’s two-for-one stock split in March 2005), plus (2) the number of shares available for award grant purposes under the Prior Plan as of October 15, 2004, plus (3) the number of any shares subject to stock options granted under the Prior Plan and outstanding as of October 15, 2004 which expire, or for any reason are cancelled or terminated, after that date without being exercised; plus (4) 1,500,000 shares that were approved as an amendment to the Plan on October 19, 2006. As of February 28, 2007, 1,450,000 shares were available for award grant purposes under the Plan, subject to future increases as described in (3) above.

The types of awards that may be granted under the Plan include stock options, restricted stock, stock bonuses, performance stock, stock units, phantom stock and other forms of awards granted or denominated in the Company’s common stock or units of the Company’s common stock, as well as certain cash bonus awards. Under the terms of the Plan, the option price for the incentive stock options (“ISO”) and nonqualified stock options (“NQSO”) shall not be less than the fair market value of the shares of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. For ISO, the exercise price per share may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date for any individual possessing more than 10% of the total outstanding stock of the Company. Stock options granted under the Plan and the Prior Plan become exercisable over periods of one to four years and expire not more than ten years from the date of grant. Beginning with grants in fiscal 2007, the Company intends to grant NQSO to employees in the United States.

11

Table of Contents

A summary of the option activity under the Plan and the Prior Plan follows (amounts in thousands except weighted average exercise price):

The following table summarizes significant option groups outstanding as of February 28, 2007 and related weighted average exercise price and life information (number of options and intrinsic value in thousands):

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $34.16 as of February 23, 2007 (the last actual trading day of our third quarter of fiscal 2007), which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.

The total pre-tax intrinsic value related to stock options exercised during the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 was $9.2 million and $6.5 million, respectively. The total estimated fair value of shares vested during the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 was $12.2 million and $7.8 million, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In October 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Resources Connection, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders in October 2000. Under the terms of the ESPP, a total of 2,400,000 shares of common stock may be issued. The ESPP allows for qualified employees (as defined) to participate in the purchase of designated shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of common stock at the beginning or end of each semi-annual stock purchase period. The Company issued 273,000 and 169,000 shares of common stock pursuant to this plan for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 and the year ended May 31, 2006, respectively. There are 1,312,000 shares of common stock available for issuance under the ESPP as of February 28, 2007.

12

Table of Contents

Valuation and Expense Information under SFAS 123 (R)

Effective June 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 (R) using the modified prospective transition method; accordingly, prior periods have not been restated. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2007 included compensation expense for stock options granted, restricted stock issued and employee stock purchases related to the ESPP prior to, but not yet vested as of, May 31, 2006.

The following table summarizes the impact of the adoption of SFAS 123 (R) (in thousands, except per share amounts):

The weighted average estimated fair value per share of employee stock options granted during the three and nine months ended February 28, 2007 was $16.81 and $16.47, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:

As of February 28, 2007, there was $51.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested employee stock options granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 36 months.

SFAS 123 (R) requires that excess tax benefits be recognized as an increase to additional paid-in capital and that unrealized tax benefits be recognized as income tax expense unless there are excess tax benefits from previous equity awards to which it can be offset. The Company calculated the amount of eligible excess tax benefits that are available on the adoption date to offset future tax shortfalls in accordance with the long-form method described in paragraph 81 of SFAS 123 (R).

SFAS 123 (R) requires that the Company recognize compensation expense for only the portion of restricted stock and restricted stock units that are expected to vest, rather than recording forfeitures when they occur, as previously permitted under SFAS 123. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from that estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.

SFAS 123 (R) no longer requires the recognition of deferred compensation upon the grant of restricted stock. On June 1, 2006, deferred compensation related to awards issued prior to the adoption of SFAS 123 (R) was reduced to zero with a corresponding decrease in “Additional Paid-in Capital.” In addition, SFAS 123 (R) requires the Company to reflect, in its Statement of Cash Flows, the tax savings resulting from tax deductions in excess of expense recognized in its Statement of Income as a financing cash flow, which will impact the Company’s future reported cash flows from operating activities.

Provision for Income Taxes under SFAS 123 (R)

The provision for income taxes increased from $8.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2006 to $10.4 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007. The effective tax rate was 44.2% for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and 39.3% for the third quarter of fiscal 2006. As a result of the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123 (R), the Company’s projected effective tax rate increased by 4.2 percentage points in the third quarter of fiscal 2007. Under SFAS 123 (R), the Company cannot recognize a potential tax benefit for certain ISO grants until and unless the holder exercises his or her option and then sells the shares within a certain period of time. In addition, the Company can only recognize a potential tax benefit for employees’ acquisition and subsequent sale of shares purchased through the Company’s ESPP if the sale occurs within a certain defined period. As a result, the Company’s provision for income taxes is likely to fluctuate from historical rates for

13

Table of Contents

the foreseeable future. Further, under SFAS 123 (R), these potential tax benefits associated with ISO grants fully vested at the date of adoption of SFAS 123 (R) will be recognized as additions to paid-in capital when and if those options are exercised and not as a reduction to the Company’s tax provision. The Company recognized a benefit of approximately $1.0 million related to stock-based compensation for nonqualified stock options expensed and for eligible disqualifying ISO exercises during the third quarter of fiscal 2007.

Pro Forma Information under SFAS 123 for Periods Prior to Fiscal 2007

The table below reflects pro forma net income and pro forma net income per share for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2006 as if the Company had recognized compensation cost at the date of grant using the fair value method (in thousands, except per share amounts):

The fair value of each option is estimated, as of the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for grants in fiscal 2006: expected volatility of 50.0%; risk-free interest rate of 3.8% to 4.6%; no expected dividends; and expected lives of 6.25 years.

10. Supplemental cash flow information

The Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 does not include under the caption “cash flows from investing activities” the non-cash issuance of 65,170 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing 50% of the $3.0 million purchase price for the remaining 20% of the outstanding shares of Nordic Spring.

The Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 does not include under the caption “cash flows from financing activities” the non-cash cancellation of 289,538 shares of the Company’s common stock that had been classified as treasury stock. In accordance with the amendment to the Company’s 2004 Performance Incentive Plan that was approved by shareholders during the second quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company was no longer able to reissue these shares at a future date.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes. This discussion and analysis contains “forward-looking statements,” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should,” or “will” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements, and all phases of our operations, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are identified herein and in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2006 (File No. 0-32113). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements and those of our industry may be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking statements in this filing. References in this filing to “Resources Connection,” “Resources Global Professionals,” “Resources Global,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Resources Connection, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

14

Table of Contents

Overview

Resources Global is a multinational professional services firm that provides experienced finance, accounting, risk management and internal audit, information technology, human resources, supply chain management and legal professionals to clients on a project basis. We assist our clients with discrete projects requiring specialized expertise in 1) finance and accounting, such as mergers and acquisitions due diligence, financial analyses (e.g., product costing and margin analyses), corporate reorganizations, budgeting and forecasting, audit preparation, public entity reporting and tax-related projects; 2) information management services, such as financial system/enterprise resource planning implementation and post implementation optimization; 3) human resources management services, such as change management and compensation program design and implementation; 4) internal audit services (provided via our subsidiary Resources Audit Solutions or “RAS”), including compliance reviews, internal audit co-sourcing and assisting clients with their compliance efforts under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes”); 5) supply chain management (“SCM”) services, such as leading strategic sourcing efforts, negotiating contracts and performing tactical purchasing; and 6) legal services providing attorneys, paralegals and contract managers to assist clients (including law firms) with project-based or peak period needs.

We began operations in June 1996 as a division of Deloitte & Touche and operated as Resources Connection, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Deloitte & Touche, from January 1997 until April 1999. In November 1998, our management formed RC Transaction Corp., renamed Resources Connection, Inc., to raise capital for an intended management-led buyout. In April 1999, we completed the management-led buyout in partnership with several investors. In December 2000, we completed our initial public offering of common stock and began trading on the NASDAQ. We currently trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. In January 2005, we announced the change of our operating entity name to Resources Global Professionals to better reflect the Company’s global capabilities.

Growth in revenue, to date, has generally been the result of establishing offices in major markets. The following table summarizes for each fiscal year the number of offices opened, international expansion and the creation of additional service lines.

As of February 28, 2007, we served our clients through 53 offices in the United States and 29 offices abroad.

15

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The following represents a summary of our critical accounting policies, defined as those policies that we believe: (a) are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and (b) involve inherently uncertain issues that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.

Valuation of long-lived assets—We assess the potential impairment of long-lived tangible and intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Under the current accounting standard, our goodwill and certain other intangible assets are not subject to periodic amortization over their estimated useful lives. These assets are now considered to have an indefinite life and their carrying values are required to be assessed by us for impairment at least annually. Depending on future market values, our operating performance and other factors, these assessments could potentially result in impairment reductions of these intangible assets in the future and these adjustments may materially affect the Company’s future financial results.

Allowance for doubtful accounts—We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from our clients failing to make required payments for services rendered. We estimate this allowance based upon our knowledge of the financial condition of our clients, review of historical receivable and reserve trends and other pertinent information. If the financial condition of our clients deteriorates or we note an unfavorable trend in aggregate receivable collections, additional allowances may be required and these additional allowances may materially affect the Company’s future financial results.

Income taxes—In order to prepare our consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates of income taxes, if applicable, in each jurisdiction in which we operate. The process incorporates an assessment of any current tax exposure together with temporary differences resulting from different treatment of transactions for tax and financial statement purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The recovery of deferred tax assets from future taxable income must be assessed and, to the extent recovery is not likely, we will establish a valuation allowance. An increase in the valuation allowance results in recording additional tax expense. If the ultimate tax liability is different than the amount of tax expense we have reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income, an adjustment of tax expense may need to be recorded and this adjustment may materially affect the Company’s future financial results.

Revenue recognition—We generally charge our clients on an hourly basis for the professional services of our associates. We recognize revenue once services have been rendered and invoice the majority of our clients in the United States on a weekly basis. Some of our clients served by our international operations are billed on a monthly basis. Our clients are contractually obligated to pay us for all hours billed. To a much lesser extent, we also earn revenue if a client hires one of our associates. This type of contractually non-refundable revenue is recognized at the time our client completes the hiring process.

Stock-based Compensation—Under our 2004 Performance Incentive Plan, officers, employees, and outside directors have received or may receive grants of restricted stock, stock units, options to purchase common stock or, under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), may make employee stock purchases. Effective June 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 revised, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123 (R)”), using the modified prospective transition method; accordingly, prior periods have not been restated. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2007 included compensation expense for stock options granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, May 31, 2006. Under the previously accepted accounting standards, there was no stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and employee stock purchases recognized during prior periods.

The adoption of SFAS 123 (R) requires that the Company estimate the fair value of employee stock options on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which takes into account assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Additional variables to be considered are the expected term and risk-free interest rate over the expected term of our employee stock options. In addition, because stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Statement of Income is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123 (R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual

16

Table of Contents

forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience. If facts and circumstances change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123 (R) in future periods, the compensation expense recorded under SFAS 123 (R) may differ materially from the amount recorded in the current period.

The weighted average estimated fair value per share of employee stock options granted during the three months ended February 28, 2007 was $16.81 using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:

The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee stock options. The dividend yield assumption is based on our history of not paying dividends and our expectation that we will not pay dividends in the future. As permitted under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB No. 107”), the Company used the “vanilla option” term for measuring the expected life of stock option grants during the first nine months of fiscal 2007; under this option, a stock option grant with a 10 year contractual life and four year vesting would have an expected life of 6.25 years. The Company is permitted to use this method of estimating the expected life of stock option grants through December 2007. Also as permitted under SAB No. 107, the Company has used its historical volatility to estimate the expected volatility of the price of its common stock.

We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Three Months Ended February 28, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended February 28, 2006

Computations of percentage change period over period are based upon the truncated numbers presented herein.

Revenue. Revenue increased $27.2 million, or 17.0%, to $187.5 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007 from $160.3 million for the three months ended February 28, 2006. The continued expansion of our scope of services and improved overall demand for our services triggered the increase in revenue, resulting in more billable hours for our associates and an improvement in rate per hour. We believe our business expanded due in part to increasing market awareness of our ability to provide services. In particular, finance and accounting services increased significantly in the current quarter compared to the prior year quarter. We believe one of the reasons for the increase in these types of engagements is new projects from existing clients who had engaged us to provide services during their initial phase of compliance with Sarbanes. To a lesser extent, all of our other service lines experienced growth in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006’s third quarter (except for the RAS service line). Though we believe we have improved the awareness of our service offerings with clients and prospective clients in part because of assistance we have provided during the initial years of compliance with Sarbanes, there can be no assurance that there will be continuing demand for Sarbanes or related internal control services.

Average bill rates improved by 8.3% compared to the prior year average bill rate. The increase in revenue is also reflective of the increase in the number of associates on assignment from 2,682 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2006 to 3,142 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2007. We operated 82 and 75 offices in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively. Our clients do not sign long-term contracts with us. Therefore, our future revenue or operating results cannot be reliably predicted from previous quarters or from extrapolation of past results.

Revenue for the United States offices improved 12.1% or $15.3 million from $126.8 million for the three months ended February 28, 2006 to $142.1 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007. Revenue for the Dutch practice improved 10.8% or $1.7 million, from $15.8 million for the three months ended February 28, 2006 to $17.5 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007. The other international offices’ revenue grew 58.5% or $10.3 million, from $17.6 million for the three months ended February 28, 2006 to $27.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007. The increase in revenue for the international practices was partially attributable to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the currencies of our international operations. These currency fluctuations increased revenue by approximately $3.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2006.

17

Table of Contents

Direct Cost of Services. Direct cost of services increased $16.7 million, or 16.8%, to $115.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007 from $99.2 million for the three months ended February 28, 2006. The increase in direct cost of services was attributable to the previously described expansion of the scope of services resulting in more chargeable hours for our associates at higher average pay rates; overall, the average pay rate per hour increased by 8.8% year-over-year. The direct cost of services as a percentage of revenue (the “direct cost of services percentage”) was 61.8% and 61.9% for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The direct cost of services percentage decreased slightly between the two quarters because of a reduction in the amount of benefit costs and reimbursable expenses relative to revenue.

The cost of compensation and related benefits offered to the associates of our international offices has been greater as a percentage of revenue than our domestic operations. In addition, international offices use independent contractors more extensively. Thus, the direct cost of services percentage of our international offices has usually exceeded our domestic operation’s targeted direct cost of services percentage of 60%.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“S, G & A”) increased as a percentage of revenue from 24.0% for the quarter ended February 28, 2006 to 25.9% for the quarter ended February 28, 2007. S, G &A increased $10.2 million, or 26.6%, to $48.6 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007 from $38.4 million for the three months ended February 28, 2006. The increase in S, G & A was primarily caused by the adoption in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 (R). Prior to that date, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under APB No. 25, the intrinsic value of the options was used to record compensation expense and if the grant price of the options was equal to the fair market value of the option at the date of grant, no compensation expense related to the stock options was included in determining net income and net income per share. Under SFAS 123 (R), the Company determines the estimated fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The estimated fair value determined is recognized as expense over the service period for options that are expected to vest (the Company’s stock options vest over four years). As a result of the implementation of SFAS 123 (R), the Company recognized non-cash stock-based compensation expense of approximately $5.0 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007. There was no corresponding amount recorded during the three months ended February 28, 2006.

In addition to the increase caused by the adoption of SFAS 123 (R), compensation and related benefit expenses increased as the Company hired additional personnel to support and position the Company for potential future revenue growth. Management and administrative headcount grew from 713 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2006 to 790 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2007. Other increases in the 2007 fiscal third quarter compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2006 were: an increase in spending for advertising, as the Company launched a new branding campaign in various United States and international business periodicals; occupancy and related costs from relocated, expanded or new offices; and bonus expense as a result of the Company’s improved revenue results.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense. Amortization of intangible assets decreased to $318,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to $435,000 in the prior year’s third quarter. The Company has not completed an analysis of the allocation of goodwill related to its purchase of the remaining 20% of the stock of Nordic Spring in Sweden in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The Company will consider a number of factors in performing this valuation, including a valuation of identifiable intangible assets but does not expect such a valuation to cause a material change in amortization. Pending completion of this review, amortization is expected to be $1,381,000 in fiscal 2007.

Depreciation expense increased from $887,000 for the three months ended February 28, 2006 to $1.6 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007. The increase in depreciation was related to a higher asset base due to the investments made in offices relocated or expanded since November 2005, and investments in the Company’s new operating system and other information technology. Also, in October 2005, the Company completed the purchase of an office building in Irvine, California for approximately $9.3 million. The Company expects to transition its corporate office and domestic service center to the new location in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. As the Company completes the implementation of its information technology system, makes improvements to the new office building in anticipation of the corporate relocation and invests in expanded or new office space for existing offices, it is expected that the Company’s depreciation expense will increase.

Interest Income. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, interest income was $2.4 million compared to interest income of $1.3 million in the quarter ended February 28, 2006. The increase in interest income is a combination of a higher average cash balance available for investment in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and the improved interest rates available year over year.

18

Table of Contents

The Company has invested available cash in money market and commercial paper investments that have been classified as cash equivalents due to the short maturities of these investments. As of February 28, 2007, the Company also has $55.0 million of investments in government-agency bonds with remaining maturity dates between three months and one year from the balance sheet date, which are classified as short-term investments and considered “held-to-maturity” securities. In addition, the Company also holds $56.0 million in government-agency bonds with maturity dates in excess of one year from the balance sheet date. These bonds, classified as long-term investments, mature through February 2009, have coupon rates ranging from 5.2% to 5.5% and have been classified in the February 28, 2007 consolidated balance sheet as “held-to-maturity” securities.

Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased from $8.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2006 to $10.4 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007. The effective tax rate was 44.2% for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and 39.2% for the third quarter of fiscal 2006. As a result of the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123 (R), the Company’s projected effective tax rate increased by 4.2 percentage points in the third quarter of fiscal 2007. Under SFAS 123 (R), the Company cannot recognize a potential tax benefit for certain incentive stock option (“ISO”) grants unless and until the holder exercises his or her option and then sells the shares within a certain period of time. In addition, the Company can only recognize a potential tax benefit for employees’ acquisition and subsequent sale of shares purchased through the ESPP if the sale occurs within a certain defined period. As a result, the Company’s provision for income taxes is likely to be volatile for the foreseeable future. Further, under SFAS 123 (R), these potential tax benefits associated with ISO grants fully vested at the date of adoption of SFAS 123 (R) will be recognized as additions to paid-in capital when and if those options are exercised and not as a reduction to the Company’s tax provision. The Company recognized a benefit of approximately $1.0 million related to stock-based compensation for nonqualified stock options expensed and for eligible disqualifying ISO exercises during the third quarter of fiscal 2007. Periodically, the Company reviews the components of both book and taxable income to analyze the adequacy of the tax provision. There can be no assurance that the Company’s effective tax rate will not increase in the future.

Nine Months Ended February 28, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended February 28, 2006

Computations of percentage change period over period are based upon the truncated numbers presented herein.

Revenue. Revenue increased $67.4 million, or 14.4%, to $535.4 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 from $468.0 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006. The continued expansion of our scope of services and improved overall demand for our services triggered the increase in revenue, resulting in more billable hours for our associates and an improvement in rate per hour.

Average bill rates improved by 7.1% compared to the prior year average bill rate. The increase in revenue is also reflective of the increase in the number of associates on assignment from 2,682 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2006 to 3,142 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2007. We operated 82 and 75 offices in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively.

Revenue for the United States offices improved 11.1% or $40.8 million from $368.4 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006 to $409.2 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007. Revenue for the Dutch practice improved 11.7% or $5.4 million, from $46.1 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006 to $51.5 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007. The other international offices’ revenue grew 39.4% or $21.1 million, from $53.5 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006 to $74.6 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007. The increase in revenue for the international practices was partially attributable to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the currencies of our international operations. These currency fluctuations increased revenue by approximately $6.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2006.

Direct Cost of Services. Direct cost of services increased $41.0 million, or 14.4%, to $326.0 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 from $285.0 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006. The increase in direct cost of services was attributable to the previously described expansion of the scope of services resulting in more chargeable hours for our associates at higher average pay rates; overall, the average pay rate per hour increased by 7.3% year-over-year. The direct cost of services percentage was 60.9% for both the nine months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. S, G & A increased as a percentage of revenue from 23.4% for the nine months ended February 28, 2006 to 26.1% for the nine months ended February 28, 2007. S, G &A increased $30.7 million, or 28.1%, to $140.0 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 from $109.3 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006. The increase in S, G & A was partially caused by the adoption in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 (R). Prior to that date, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under APB No. 25, the intrinsic value of the options was used to record compensation expense and if the grant price of the options was

19

Table of Contents

equal to the fair market value of the option at the date of grant, no compensation expense related to the stock options was included in determining net income and net income per share. Under SFAS 123 (R), the Company determines the estimated fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The estimated fair value determined is recognized as expense over the service period for options that are expected to vest (the Company’s stock options vest over four years). As a result of the implementation of SFAS 123 (R), the Company recognized non-cash stock-based compensation expense of approximately $14.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2007. There was no corresponding amount recorded in the first nine months of fiscal 2006.

In addition to the increase caused by the adoption of SFAS 123 (R), compensation and related benefit expenses increased as the Company hired additional personnel to support and position the Company for potential future revenue growth. Management and administrative headcount grew from 713 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2006 to 790 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2007. Other increases in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2006 were: occupancy and related costs from relocated, expanded or new offices; bonus expense as a result of the Company’s improved revenue results; and an increase in spending for advertising, as the Company launched a new branding campaign in various United States and international business periodicals.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense. Amortization of intangible assets decreased to $1.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 compared to $1.3 million in the prior year’s first nine months, as amortization on some of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets was complete.

Depreciation expense increased from $1.9 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006 to $4.4 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007. The increase in depreciation was related to a higher asset base due to the investments made in offices relocated or expanded since May 2005, and investments in the Company’s new operating system and other information technology.

Interest Income. During the first nine months of fiscal 2007, interest income was $6.3 million compared to interest income of $3.4 million in the nine months ended February 28, 2006. The increase in interest income is a combination of a higher average cash balance available for investment in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 and the improved interest rates available year over year.

Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased from $29.0 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006 to $31.5 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007. The effective tax rate was 44.9% for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 and 39.3% for the first nine months of fiscal 2006. As a result of the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123 (R), the Company’s projected effective tax rate increased by 4.9 percentage points in the first nine months of fiscal 2007. Under SFAS 123 (R), the Company cannot recognize a potential tax benefit for certain incentive stock option grants until and unless the holder exercises his or her option and then sells the shares within a certain period of time. In addition, the Company can only recognize a potential tax benefit for employees’ acquisition and subsequent sale of shares purchased through the ESPP if the sale occurs within a certain defined period. As a result, the Company’s provision for income taxes is likely to be volatile for the foreseeable future. Further, under SFAS 123 (R), these potential tax benefits associated with ISO grants fully vested at the date of adoption of SFAS 123 (R) will be recognized as additions to paid-in capital when and if those options are exercised and not as a reduction to the Company’s tax provision. The Company recognized a benefit of approximately $2.3 million related to stock-based compensation for nonqualified stock options expensed and for eligible disqualifying ISO exercises during the first nine months of fiscal 2007.

Comparability of Quarterly Results. Our quarterly results have fluctuated in the past and we believe they will continue to do so in the future. Certain factors that could affect our quarterly operating results are described in Part II, Item 1A-Risk Factors. Due to these and other factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not meaningful indicators of future performance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary source of liquidity is cash provided by our operations. On an annual basis, we have generated positive cash flows from operations since inception.

The Company has a $3.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement allows the Company to choose the interest rate applicable to advances. The interest rate options are Bank of America’s prime rate, a London Inter-Bank Offered (“LIBOR”) rate plus 1.5% or Bank of America’s Grand Cayman Banking Center (“IBOR”) rate plus 1.5%. Interest, if any, is payable monthly. There is an annual facility fee of 0.25% payable on the unutilized portion of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement expires December 1, 2007. As of February 28, 2007, the Company had $2.5 million available under the terms of the Credit Agreement as Bank of America has issued $300,000 of outstanding letters of credit in favor of third parties related to operating leases. The Company is in compliance with all covenants included in the Credit Agreement.

20

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operating activities was $42.0 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 compared to $29.7 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2006. Cash provided by operations in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 resulted from the net income of the Company of $38.7 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $14.8 million, offset by net cash used for changes in operating assets and liabilities of $11.5 million. In the first nine months of fiscal 2006, cash provided by operations resulted from net income of the Company of $44.9 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $4.1 million, offset by net cash used for changes in operating assets and liabilities of $19.2 million. Non-cash items increased in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 as a result of the Company’s adoption of the accounting required in SFAS 123 (R) to expense stock-based compensation; these charges do not reflect an actual cash outflow from the Company but are an estimate of the fair value of the services provided by employees and directors in exchange for stock option grants and purchase of stock through the Company’s ESPP. As of February 28, 2007, the Company had $111.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, $55.0 million of short-term United States government agency bonds and $56.0 million of long-term United States government agency bonds.

Net cash used in investing activities was $25.4 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 compared to $1.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2006. Cash used to invest in short-term and long-term marketable securities (commercial paper and government agency bonds) net of cash received from the redemption of short-term and long-term investments, resulted in a net use of $14.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 compared to a net increase of $14.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2006. In addition, the Company spent approximately $9.9 million on property and equipment in the first nine months of fiscal 2007, compared to $15.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2006. The Company also completed the purchase of the remaining shares of Nordic Spring for $1.5 million in fiscal 2007.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $6.1 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2007, compared to net cash provided of $481,000 for the nine months ended February 28, 2006. The primary cause of the change was the Company’s repurchase during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 of 600,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of $23.55 per share for approximately $14.1 million. In addition, cash received from stock option exercises and purchases of common stock through the ESPP was $17.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 compared to $14.0 million in the corresponding period of fiscal 2006.

Our ongoing operations and anticipated growth in the geographic markets we currently serve will require us to continue making investments in capital equipment, primarily technology hardware and software. In addition, we may consider making additional strategic acquisitions. We anticipate that our current cash and the ongoing cash flows from our operations will be adequate to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next 12 months. If we require additional capital resources to grow our business, either internally or through acquisition, we may seek to sell additional equity securities or secure debt financing. The sale of additional equity securities or the addition of new debt financing could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. We may not be able to obtain financing arrangements in amounts or on terms acceptable to us in the future. In the event we are unable to obtain additional financing when needed, we may be compelled to delay or curtail our plans to develop our business, which could have a material adverse affect on our operations, market position and competitiveness.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an Amendment of FAS 115” (“SFAS 159”), which permits companies to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company that elects the fair value option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis. SFAS 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements to clarify the effect of a company’s election on its earnings but does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other accounting standards. Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value must be displayed on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue No. 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation).” This EITF requires that companies disclose how they report, within their financial statements, taxes assessed by a governmental authority that involve a specific revenue producing transaction between a seller and a customer. These types of taxes may include, but are not limited to, sales, use, value added and excise taxes. These taxes collected from customers may be presented either on a gross basis (that is, included in revenue and cost of services) or on a net basis (excluded from revenue and cost of services but included as a liability in the balance sheet until the tax has been remitted to the appropriate governmental authority). The Company has historically accounted for such taxes on a net basis and therefore adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-03 in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 had no impact on the Company’s financial.

21

Table of Contents

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”), which provides guidance for recognition of a net liability or asset to report the funded status of company defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively referred to herein as “benefit plans”) on company balance sheets. The pronouncement clarifies (1) recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in its statement of financial position; (2) recognition as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to FASB Statement No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions”, or No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” (3) measurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position (with limited exceptions); and (4) disclosure requirements in the notes to financial statements with additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. SFAS 158 is effective as of the end of our 2007 fiscal year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 158 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The pronouncement clarifies (1) the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value; (2) the information used to measure fair value; and (3) the effect that fair value measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS 157 is effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize the impact of a tax position in its financial statements, if that position will more likely than not be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Interest Rate Risk. At the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we had approximately $222.6 million of cash, highly liquid short-term investments and long-term investments. Securities that the Company has the ability and positive intent to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost. These securities consist of commercial paper and government-agency bonds. Cost approximates market for these securities. All income generated from these current investments is recorded as interest income.

The earnings on these investments are subject to changes in interest rates, and to the extent interest rates were to decline, it would reduce our interest income.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk. Prior to fiscal 2004, our foreign operations were not significant to our overall operations, and our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk was low. However, as our strategy to continue expanding foreign operations progresses, more of our revenues will be derived from foreign operations denominated in the currency of the applicable markets.

For the quarter ended February 28, 2007, approximately 24% of the Company’s revenues were generated outside of the United States. As a result, our operating results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. Revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the monthly average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Thus, as the value of the U.S. dollar fluctuates relative to the currencies in our non-U.S. based operations, our reported results may vary.

Assets and liabilities of our non-U.S. based operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate effective at the end of each monthly reporting period. Eighty-nine percent of our balances of cash, short-term investments and long-term investments as of February 28, 2007 were denominated in U.S. dollars. The remaining 11% was comprised primarily of cash

22

Table of Contents

balances translated from Euros, British Pounds, Hong Kong Dollars, Swedish Krona or Japanese Yen. The difference resulting from the translation each period of assets and liabilities of our non-U.S. based operations are recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain”.

Although we intend to monitor our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, including the use of financial hedging techniques if and when we may deem it appropriate, we cannot assure you that exchange rate fluctuations will not adversely affect our financial results in the future.

As of the end of third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 28, 2007 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, during the Company’s quarter ended February 28, 2007 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

We are not a party to any material legal proceedings.

There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2006. For convenience, our updated risk factors are included in this Item 1A. below. The order in which the risks appear is not intended as an indication of their relative weight or importance.

We must provide our clients with highly qualified and experienced associates, and the loss of a significant number of our associates, or an inability to attract and retain new associates, could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our business involves the delivery of professional services, and our success depends on our ability to provide our clients with highly qualified and experienced associates who possess the skills and experience necessary to satisfy their needs. Such professionals are in great demand, particularly in certain geographic areas, and are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future. Our ability to attract and retain associates with the requisite experience and skills depends on several factors including, but not limited to, our ability to:

We cannot assure you that we will be successful in accomplishing any of these factors and, even if we are, that we will be successful in attracting and retaining the number of highly qualified and experienced associates necessary to maintain and grow our business.

Decreased effectiveness of equity compensation could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain employees.

We have historically used stock (via our ESPP) and stock options as key components of our employee compensation program in order to align employees’ interests with the interests of our stockholders, encourage employee retention and provide competitive compensation packages. As a result of our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123 (R)”) during the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the future use of stock options and other stock-based awards to attract and retain employees could become more limited due to the possible impact on our results of operations. This development could make it more difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees.

23

Table of Contents

The market for professional services is highly competitive, and if we are unable to compete effectively against our competitors, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

We operate in a competitive, fragmented market, and we compete for clients and associates with a variety of organizations that offer similar services. The competition is likely to increase in the future due to the expected growth of the market and the relatively few barriers to entry. Our principal competitors include:

We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively against existing or future competitors. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources, greater revenues and greater name recognition, which may afford them an advantage in attracting and retaining clients and associates. In addition, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to changes in companies’ needs and developments in the professional services industry.

An economic downturn or change in the use of outsourced professional services associates could adversely affect our business.

During the downturn in the economy of the United States during fiscal 2002 and 2003, our business was adversely affected. As the general level of economic activity slowed, our clients delayed or cancelled plans that involved professional services, particularly outsourced professional services. Consequently, we experienced fluctuations in the demand for our services. In addition, the use of professional services associates on a project-by-project basis could decline for non-economic reasons. In the event of a reduction in the demand for our associates, our financial results could suffer.

Our business depends upon our ability to secure new projects from clients and, therefore, we could be adversely affected if we fail to do so.

We do not have long-term agreements with our clients for the provision of services. The success of our business is dependent on our ability to secure new projects from clients. For example, if we are unable to secure new client projects because of improvements in our competitors’ service offerings, or because of a change in government regulatory requirements, or because of an economic downturn decreasing the demand for outsourced professional services, our business is likely to be materially adversely affected. New impediments to our ability to secure projects from clients may develop over time, such as the increasing use by large clients of in-house procurement groups that manage their relationship with service providers.

We may be legally liable for damages resulting from the performance of projects by our associates or for our clients’ mistreatment of our associates.

Many of our engagements with our clients involve projects that are critical to our clients’ businesses. If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, we could be subject to legal liability or damage to our reputation, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. It is likely, because of the nature of our business, that we will be sued in the future. Claims brought against us could have a serious negative effect on our reputation and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because we are in the business of placing our associates in the workplaces of other companies, we are subject to possible claims by our associates alleging discrimination, sexual harassment, negligence and other similar activities by our clients. We may also be subject to similar claims from our clients based on activities by our associates. The cost of defending such claims, even if groundless, could be substantial and the associated negative publicity could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain associates and clients.

We may not be able to grow our business, manage our growth or sustain our current business.

We grew rapidly from our inception in 1996 until 2001 by opening new offices and by increasing the volume of services we provide through existing offices. We experienced a decline in revenue in fiscal 2002, but revenue has increased in each subsequent fiscal year. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or expand our market presence in our current locations or to successfully enter other markets or locations. A significant portion of growth during fiscal 2004 and 2005 was caused by clients’ demands related to compliance with certain sections of Sarbanes. As initial demand for Sarbanes related services slows, our ability to successfully grow our business will depend upon a number of factors, including our ability to:

24

Table of Contents

Even if we are able to continue our growth, the growth will result in new and increased responsibilities for our management as well as increased demands on our internal systems, procedures and controls, and our administrative, financial, marketing and other resources. Failure to adequately respond to these new responsibilities and demands may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.

The increase in our international activities will expose us to additional operational challenges that we might not otherwise face.

As we increase our international activities, we will have to confront and manage a number of risks and expenses that we would not face if we conducted our operations solely in the United States. Any of these risks or expenses could cause a material negative effect on our operating results. These risks and expenses include:

We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, companies, and these acquisitions could disrupt our business.

We have acquired several companies and may continue to acquire companies in the future. Entering into an acquisition entails many risks, any of which could harm our business, including:

25

Table of Contents

Our business could suffer if we lose the services of one or more key members of our management.

Our future success depends upon the continued employment of Donald B. Murray, our chief executive officer, and Stephen J. Giusto, our chief financial officer. The departure of Mr. Murray, Mr. Giusto or other members of our management team could significantly disrupt our operations. Key members of our senior management team also include Karen M. Ferguson, an executive vice president, Anthony Cherbak, executive vice president and chief operating officer, John D. Bower, senior vice president, finance, and Kate W. Duchene, chief legal officer and executive vice president of human relations. We do not have employment agreements with Mr. Cherbak, Mr. Bower or Ms. Duchene.

Our quarterly financial results may be subject to significant fluctuations that may increase the volatility of our stock price.

Our results of operations could vary significantly from quarter to quarter. Factors that could affect our quarterly operating results include:

Due to these factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not meaningful indicators of future performance. It is possible that in some future periods, our results of operations may be below the expectations of investors. If this occurs, the price of our common stock could decline.

If our internal controls over financial reporting do not comply with the requirements of Sarbanes, our business and stock price could be adversely affected.

Section 404 of Sarbanes requires us to evaluate periodically the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of our internal controls as of the end of each fiscal year. Section 404 also requires our independent registered public accountant to attest to, and report on, management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management does not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors or frauds. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, involving us have been, or will be, detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can also be circumvented by individual acts of a person, or by collusion among two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure you that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to errors or frauds may occur and not be detected.

26

Table of Contents

Although our management has determined, and our independent registered public accountant has attested, that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 31, 2006, we cannot assure you that we or our independent registered public accountant will not identify a material weakness in our internal controls in the future. A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting would require management and our independent registered public accountant to evaluate our internal controls as ineffective. If our internal control over financial reporting is not considered adequate, we may experience a loss of public confidence, which could have an adverse effect on our business and our stock price. Additionally, if our internal controls over financial reporting otherwise fail to comply with the requirements of Sarbanes, our business and stock price could be adversely affected.

We may be subject to laws and regulations that impose difficult and costly compliance requirements and subject us to potential liability and the loss of clients.

In connection with providing services to clients in certain regulated industries, such as the gaming and energy industries, we are subject to industry-specific regulations, including licensing and reporting requirements. Complying with these requirements is costly and, if we fail to comply, we could be prevented from rendering services to clients in those industries in the future. Additionally, changes in these requirements, or in other laws applicable to us, in the future could increase our costs of compliance.

It may be difficult for a third party to acquire our Company, and this could depress our stock price.

Delaware corporate law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our Company or our management. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. As a result, these provisions could limit the price that future investors are willing to pay for your shares. These provisions:

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a stockholder rights plan, which is described further in Note 10— Stockholders’ Equity of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in our Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006. The existence of this rights plan may also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of our Company or our management by deterring acquisitions of our stock not approved by our Board of Directors.

Our clients may be confused by the change in our name to “Resources Global Professionals”.

In January 2005, our operating company began doing business as Resources Global Professionals in order to better reflect our global capabilities and to avoid confusion with other companies using the name “Resources Connection” or some variation thereof. However, some clients and prospective clients may be confused by this name change or may be unaware that Resources Connection and Resources Global Professionals are the same company. While we believe that the name change enhances our brand identity, there is a risk that confusion over the name change could cause our financial results to suffer.

27

Table of Contents

Beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we were required to recognize compensation expense related to employee stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. There is no assurance that the expense that we are required to recognize measures accurately the value of our share-based payment awards and the recognition of this expense could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

Effective as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we were required to adopt SFAS 123 (R), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based compensation based on estimated fair values. As a result, starting with fiscal 2007, our operating results contain a charge for stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. The application of SFAS 123 (R) generally requires the use of an option-pricing model to determine the estimated fair value of share-based payment awards. This determination of estimated fair value is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because our employee stock options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion the existing valuation models may not provide an accurate measure of the estimated fair value of our employee stock options. Although the estimated fair value of employee stock options is determined in accordance with SFAS 123 (R) and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.

As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123 (R), our earnings will be lower than they would have been had we not been required to adopt SFAS 123 (R). There may also be variability in our income after income tax provision due to the timing of the exercise of options that trigger disqualifying dispositions. This will continue to be the case for future periods. We cannot predict the effect that this adverse impact on our reported operating results will have on the trading price of our common stock.

We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, including our brand name. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, the value of such rights may diminish and our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We believe that establishing, maintaining and enhancing the Resources Global Professionals brand name is essential to our business. We have applied for United States and foreign registrations on this new service mark. We have previously obtained United States registrations on our Resources Connection service mark and puzzle piece logo, Registration No. 2,516,522 registered December 11, 2001; No. 2,524,226 registered January 1, 2002; and No. 2,613,873, registered September 3, 2002, as well as certain foreign registrations. We had been aware from time to time of other companies using the name “Resources Connection” or some variation thereof and this contributed to our decision to adopt the new operating company name of Resources Global Professionals last year. However, our rights to this service mark are not currently protected by any United States or foreign registration, and there is no guarantee that any of our pending applications for such registration (or any appeals thereof or future applications) will be successful. Although we are not aware of other companies using the name “Resources Global Professionals” at this time, there could be potential trade name or service mark infringement claims brought against us by the users of these similar names and marks and those users may have service mark rights that are senior to ours. If these claims were successful, we could be forced to cease using the service mark “Resources Global Professionals” even if an infringement claim is not brought against us. It is also possible that our competitors or others will adopt service names similar to ours or that our clients will be confused by another company using a name, service mark or trademark similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity. We cannot assure you that our business would not be adversely affected if confusion did occur or if we were required to change our name.

None.

None.

None.

28

Table of Contents

None.

a) Exhibits

29

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

30