Rivulet Media, Inc. - Annual Report: 2021 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

or

Commission File No. 000-32201

Rivulet Media, Inc. 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (480) 652-9800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act): Yes o No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter – $7,850,864 as of January 31, 2022.¹

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, as of April 30, 2022 was 144,045,171.

Documents incorporated by reference – none.

RIVULET MEDIA, INC.

Table of Contents

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

In addition to historical information, this Form 10-K contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). This statement is included for the express purpose of availing Rivulet Media, Inc. of the protections of the safe harbor provisions of the PSLRA.

All statements contained in this Form 10-K, other than statements of historical facts, that address future activities, events or developments are forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements containing the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intends,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” and similar expressions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new products, services, developments or industry rankings; any statements regarding future revenue, economic conditions or performance; any statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our assessment of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual results will conform to the expectations and predictions of management is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties described under Item 1A – Risk Factors below that may cause actual results to differ materially.

Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-K are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated by management will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on our business operations. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements as they speak only of the Company’s views as of the date the statement was made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

As used in this Form 10-K, unless the context requires otherwise, “we,” “us,” “Rivulet Media,” “Rivulet,” or the “Company” means Rivulet Media, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

As used in this Form 10-K, unless the context requires otherwise, “fiscal year,” “FY,” or “fiscal” means the Company’s financial year that begins on August 1 and ends on July 31 of the following year (for example: fiscal year 2021 is equivalent to the year ended July 31, 2021).

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

Company History

Organization

Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (“Bio-Matrix”) was organized on October 6, 1998, in the State of Delaware, originally under the name Tasco International, Inc, which was subsequently changed to Tasco Holdings International, Inc., and then to Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. in 2006. On May 26, 2020, Bio-Matrix’s name was further changed to Rivulet Media, Inc.

2019 Reverse Acquisition Transaction

On July 31, 2019, Bio-Matrix acquired 100% of the share capital of Pine Hills, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, in exchange for the issuance of 4,080,000 common shares of Bio-Matrix, to Heather Cassady, the sole shareholder of Pine Hills, Inc. In conjunction with this transaction, all of the outstanding shares of Series AA and Series AAA Preferred Stock of Bio-Matrix were cancelled. Pine Hills was in the business of providing data storage and the archiving of corporate documents, and its operations subsequent to that date were nominal.

2020 Change in Control Transaction

On March 26, 2020, Debbie Rasmussen and Klusman Family Holdings (together, the “Buyers”) and David Koos and Heather Cassady (together, the “Sellers”) closed a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) whereby Buyers purchased from Sellers 4,364,235 shares of the outstanding common stock of Bio-Matrix. This transaction resulted in a change in control of Bio-Matrix, based on the transfer of approximately 55.8% of the outstanding common shares of Bio-Matrix from Sellers to Buyers. The amount of consideration for the purchase of such common shares was $215,000, with the source of the consideration being a loan from an unaffiliated third party.

As a condition of closing of the transaction, each director and officer of Bio-Matrix resigned from his position effective April 6, 2020, and Mike Witherill and Aaron Klusman were appointed as directors of Bio-Matrix to take office effective April 6, 2020. Additionally, effective April 6, 2020, Mr. Klusman was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Bio-Matrix and Mr. Witherill was appointed Vice-Chairman and President of Bio-Matrix. At the closing of the transaction, Mike Witherill and Aaron Klusman, directly and indirectly, effectively owned the equivalent of 77,896,200 shares of common stock of Bio-Matrix, representing approximately 89.6% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Bio-Matrix.

2020 Reverse Merger Transaction

On April 13, 2020, Bio-Matrix acquired 100% of the membership interests of Rivulet Films, L.L.C., which became Rivulet Films, Inc. (“Rivulet Films”), which was organized on February 11, 2020 in the State of Arizona, in exchange for the issuance of 79,155,765 shares of common stock of Bio-Matrix distributed on a pro rata basis to the shareholders of Rivulet Films. Rivulet Films is a development stage company involved in the arts and entertainment business.

On May 26, 2020, Bio-Matrix’s name was changed to Rivulet Media, Inc.

Changes in Capital Structure of Company

On January 29, 2020, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware to (1) reduce the number of shares of common stock that the Company was authorized to issue from 16,000,000,000 shares to 100,000,000 shares, with no change in the $0.0001 per share par value; (2) effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock and all classes of issued and outstanding preferred stock at an exchange ratio of one new share for every 2,000 old shares, with fractional shares of stock being rounded up to the nearest whole share.

On May 26, 2020, the Company filed an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware to (1) change the Company’s name to Rivulet Media, Inc.; (2) increase the number of shares of common stock that the Company was authorized to issue from 100,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares, par value $0.0001 per share, with the number of shares of preferred stock that the Company is authorized to issue remaining unchanged at 20,000,000 shares, par value $0.0001 per share; and (3) eliminate the class of Non-Voting Preferred Stock, of which 200,000 shares, par value $1.00 per share, had been authorized and none were outstanding.

Additional Subsidiaries

The Company forms special purpose subsidiaries to produce various programs and music projects.

As of May 28, 2020, Maughan Music, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Media, Inc. (“Maughan Music”), and Maughan Music Group LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which Maughan Music Group LLC merged with and into Maughan Music and the separate existence of Maughan Music Group LLC ceased. This merger was consummated on June 12, 2020. Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, all equitable interests of Maughan Music Group LLC converted into the right to receive 925,000 shares of common stock of Rivulet, distributed pro rata to the members of Maughan Music Group LLC. 

In June 2020, the Company formed Borderline Productions LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Films, to produce a documentary film entitled “It’s Complicated” about the life of former Arizona Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio. Production activities commenced as of July 31, 2020 and were completed as of July 31, 2021. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, this film has not been sold or distributed.

In June 2020, the Company formed PBP Productions LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Films, to produce a feature film entitled “Please Baby Please”. Production activities commenced during September 2020 and were completed as of July 31, 2021. Current discussions are underway to distribute and sell this film after it was featured at the Amsterdam Film Festival.

In August 2020, the Company formed Mistress Movie, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Films, to produce a feature film entitled “Mistress”. Production activities commenced during December 2020 and were completed as of July 31, 2021. The Company had a screening on April 12, 2022, with forty-six (46) potential buyers invited for distribution of the film. Discussions are currently underway for the distribution and sale of the movie.

In October 2020, the Company formed Into the Black Productions LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Films, to produce a documentary film entitled “Into the Black”. The Company determined not to proceed with the production of this documentary film. 

In February 2021, the Company formed Storyland Animation Studios, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, to produce a children’s television series entitled “Storyland”. Production activities commenced during February 2021; however, the production is currently on hold.

In February 2021, the Company formed Storyland Productions, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Storyland Animation Studios, LLC, to distribute a children’s television series entitled “Storyland”. Production activities commenced during February 2021; however, the production is currently on hold.

In February 2021, the Company formed Origin Story Productions, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Films, to be a union signatory entity. This subsidiary permits the Company to pay its writers as a union for work done on behalf of the Company.

In March 2021, the Company formed Eventide Media, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, to provide event-based audio and video design, production, and installation services. Business activities commenced during April 2021 and generated revenues of $64,074 through July 31, 2021.

In May 2021, the Company formed Good News Productions, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Films, to produce a feature film entitled “Taurus.”  Taurus explores the darkness of fame, addiction, the artistic process, and the music industry as it tells the story of a troubled musician on the rise in the industry, played by Colson Baker (Aka. Machine Gun Kelly). Production was completed in December 2021. Although the agreement has not been executed, the Company has reached an agreement in principal with AMC Plus to distribute this film in North America for a minimum guarantee of $1.6 million plus royalties and is in discussions to distribute the film to foreign markets through Island Film Group. There is no assurance this agreement will be executed, but management is optimistic.

The Company will continue to form special purpose subsidiaries to produce various films and music.

Business Information and Strategy

The business of the Company is to produce, distribute and market feature-length films, television series and mini-series, and television movies, from initial creative development through principal photography, postproduction, distribution and ancillary sales.

The business strategy of Rivulet as it relates to films, television series, mini-series, and television movies is to enter into contracts with well-known actors and actresses, acquire scripts able to attract large audiences that have been overlooked by blockbuster producers, focus on cost control measures, obtain favorable tax credits and financing opportunities, and enter into joint ventures to allocate some of our costs for distribution to large companies either directly or through subsidiary entities. Unlike many smaller producers, Rivulet is not targeting “artsy” niche markets but films that appeal to a wide audience. The Company’s business plan as an independent film producer is to fully leverage all of its guaranteed contracts that it negotiates upfront for a film to be produced. This strategy permits the Company to raise less equity capital and obtain short term bridge loans thereby permitting much larger budgets than historically could be obtained by independent film producers. Management believes this strategy enables the Company to produce films with budgets of up to $50 million although historically the Company has spent less than $5 million on each of its films to date. This strategy also permits the Company to forego the risks associated with a speculative movie venture which may or may not repay its funding sources by pre-selling contracts to distributors such as Netflix who are looking for content to reach its viewers. The Company can also determine whether to sell its domestic or international rights to another production company if unanticipated cash needs develop while in production.

We intend to grow and diversify our portfolio of content to capitalize on demand from emerging and traditional platforms throughout the world. We will attempt to maintain a disciplined approach to acquisition, production, and distribution of product by balancing our financial risks against the probability of commercial success for each project. We pursue the same disciplined approach to investments in, and acquisition of, libraries and other assets complementary to our business. We believe that our strategic focus on content and creation of innovative content distribution strategies will enhance our competitive position in the industry, ensure optimal use of our capital, build diversified foundation for future growth, and generate significant long-term value for our stockholders.

The Company’s activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the need for additional capital, as described below. Although the Company has commenced nominal revenue-generating operations, it does not have positive cash flows from operations and will be dependent on periodic infusions of capital to fund its operating requirements.

Background of Management

Mr. Witherill, the Company’s President and Vice-Chairman has produced a variety of films over the past 7 years. In that process he has developed significant relations with the three top major film talent agencies: Creative Artists Agency, William Morris Endeavor, and United Talent Agency. We expect to utilize his contacts, along with compelling scripts and subject matter, to attract well-known talent. Talent used, among others, in the movies previously produced by Mr. Witherill include Ed Harris, Amy Madigan, Eva Longoria, Olivia Wilde, Jack Johnson, Anna Kendrick, Thomas Hayden Church, Terrance Howard, Ashanti Douglas and Keanu Reeves.

Mr. Witherill has experience in the motion picture production and music production industries, including co-producing, through a company called MJW Films, LLC (which is not owned by the Company), the popular box office motion picture entitled John Wick, which starred Keanu Reeves. Building on this success in producing John Wick, the Company believes there is a market for smaller motion picture producers.

On May 27, 2020, the Company, Rivulet Films, and Paris Film, Inc. and Rob Paris (together, “Paris”) entered into an employment agreement pursuant to which Mr. Paris serves as President of Rivulet Films, a major subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Paris has extensive experience in the film industry, including working as a literary agent at Creative Artists Agency where he packaged and arranged financing for many iconic projects, including Scream, I Know What You Did Last Summer, Dawson’s Creek, Donnie Darko, One Hour Photo and The Day After Tomorrow. Subsequently, Mr. Paris developed and produced numerous successful film projects, including The Maiden Heist, Gambit, Everly, I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House, and The Last Laugh.

Industry Background

As a film, television, and music production company, we participate in a competitive and ever-changing industry. The following provides an overview of the media industry in which we engage, including discussion of the various markets, production and distribution methods, and some of the challenges that we, along with any other similar media enterprise, must navigate. While much of this information is generally applicable to the film, television, and music businesses in which we engage and compete, this information provides a necessary framework for an understanding of the more specific discussions of our business and projects that we undertake.

The Feature Film Industry

The feature film industry encompasses the development, production, and exhibition of feature-length motion pictures and their subsequent distribution in the home video, television, and other ancillary markets. The major studios dominate the industry, some of which have divisions that are promoted as “independent” distributors of motion pictures, including Universal Pictures, Warner Bros., Twentieth Century Fox, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, The Walt Disney Company, and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. In recent years, however, true “independent” motion picture production and distribution companies have played an important role in the production of motion pictures for the worldwide feature film market.

Independent Feature Film Production and Financing

Generally, independent production companies do not have access to the extensive capital required to make big budget motion pictures, such as the “blockbuster” product produced by the major studios. They also do not have the capital necessary to maintain the substantial overhead that is typical of such studios’ operations. Independent producers target their product at specialized markets and usually produce motion pictures with budgets lower than those of films produced by major studios. Generally, independent producers do not maintain significant infrastructure. They instead hire only creative and other production personnel and retain the other elements required for development, preproduction, principal photography, and post-production activities on a project-by-project basis. Also, independent production companies typically finance their production activities from bank loans, pre-sales, equity offerings, co-productions, and joint ventures rather than out of operating cash flow. They generally complete financing of an independent motion picture prior to commencement of principal photography to minimize risk of loss.

Independent Feature Film Distribution

Motion picture distribution encompasses the exploitation of motion pictures in theatres and in markets, such as the home video, pay-per-view, pay television, free television and ancillary markets, such as hotels, airlines and streaming films on the Internet. Independent producers do not typically have distribution capabilities and rely instead on pre-sales to North American and international distributors. Generally, the local distributor will acquire distribution rights for a motion picture in one or more of the aforementioned distribution channels from an independent producer. The local distributor will agree to advance the producer a non-refundable minimum guarantee. The local distributor will then generally receive a distribution fee of between 20% and 35% of receipts, while the producer will receive a portion of gross receipts in excess of the distribution fees, distribution expenses, and monies retained by exhibitors. The local distributor and theatrical exhibitor generally will enter into an arrangement providing for the exhibitor’s payment to the distributor of a percentage (generally 40% to 50%) of the box-office receipts for the exhibition period, depending upon the success of the motion picture.

The Television Industry

The North American television industry serves the largest broadcast market in the world, with a population of more than 300 million people and more than 120 million homes. Historically, the North American market has been the source of the major portion of the revenues earned by television producers. However, the broadcasting and cable television markets outside North America have grown in recent years through the privatization of broadcasting systems, the proliferation of broadcast licenses, and the introduction of sophisticated delivery technology, such as cable and satellite transmission systems. This growth has led to a higher proportion of revenues from international markets. Generally, a production company will license the right to broadcast a program to a combination of United States, Canadian, and international broadcasters, including free television and cable networks or individual television stations in the first run syndication market. After the initial network, cable licensing, or first run syndication period, the production company will make the program available for further commercial exploitation on cable and/or in syndication.

The Music Industry

Recorded music is one of the primary mediums of entertainment for consumers worldwide. Over time, major recorded music companies have built significant recorded music catalogs, which are long-lived assets that are exploited year after year. The sale of catalog material is typically more profitable than that of new releases, given lower development costs and more limited marketing costs. In 2021, according to MRC Data’s end-of-year report for 2021, 69.8% of all 2021 U.S. album unit sales were from recordings more than 18 months old.

Music Publishing

The Company also intends to produce and distribute musical artists and film soundtracks. Music publishing involves the acquisition of rights to, and licensing of, musical compositions (as opposed to recordings) from songwriters, composers, or other rightsholders. Music publishing revenues are derived from five main royalty sources: Mechanical, Performance, Synchronization, Digital, and Other.

In the U.S., mechanical royalties are collected by music publishers from recorded music companies or via The Harry Fox Agency, a non-exclusive licensing agent affiliated with performance-rights organization SESAC. Outside the U.S., collection societies generally perform this function. Once mechanical royalties reach the publisher (either directly from record companies or from collection societies), percentages of those royalties are paid or credited to the writer or other rightsholder of the copyright in accordance with the underlying rights agreement. Mechanical royalties are paid at a penny rate of 9.1 cents per song per unit in the U.S. for physical formats (e.g., CDs and vinyl albums) and permanent digital downloads (recordings in excess of five minutes attract a higher rate). There are also rates set for interactive streaming and non-permanent downloads based on a formula that takes into account revenues paid by consumers or advertisers with certain minimum royalties that may apply depending on the type of service. “Controlled composition” provisions contained in some recording agreements may apply to the rates mentioned above pursuant to which artist/songwriters license their rights to their record companies for as little as 75% of the statutory rates. The current U.S. statutory mechanical rates will remain in effect until the next schedule of mechanical licensing rates is determined.

Throughout the world, performance royalties are typically collected on behalf of publishers and songwriters by performance rights organizations and collection societies. Key performing rights organizations and collection societies include: The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP), SESAC and Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) in the U.S., Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society and The Performing Right Society (“MCPS/PRS”) in the U.K., The German Copyright Society in Germany (“GEMA”), and the Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers in Japan (“JASRAC”). The societies pay a percentage (which is set in each country) of the performance royalties to the copyright owner(s) or administrators (i.e., the publisher(s)), and a percentage directly to the songwriter(s), of the composition. Thus, the publisher generally retains the performance royalties it receives other than any amounts attributable to co-publishers.

The music publishing market has proven to be more resilient than the recorded music market in recent years as revenue streams (other than mechanical royalties) are largely unaffected by piracy and are benefiting from additional sources of income from digital exploitation of music in streaming and downloads.

Production and Distribution Methods

Theatrical Production

Theatrical production consists of “greenlighting” (proceeding with production) and financing motion pictures, as well as the development of screenplays, filming activities, and the post-filming editing/post-production process. We plan to take a disciplined approach to theatrical production with the goal of producing content that can be distributed through various domestic and international platforms. We may attempt to mitigate the financial risk associated with production by negotiating co-financing development and co-production agreements (which provide for joint efforts and cost-sharing between us and one or more third-party companies) and preselling international distribution rights on a selective basis, including through international output agreements (which refers to licensing the rights to distribute a film in one or more media generally for a limited term, in one or more specific territories prior to completion of the film). We also may attempt to minimize production exposure by structuring agreements with talent that provide for them to participate in the financial success of the motion picture in exchange for reducing guaranteed amounts to be paid, regardless of the film’s success (referred to as “up-front payments”). In addition, many states and foreign countries have implemented incentive programs designed to attract film production as a means of economic development. Government incentives typically take the form of sales tax refunds, transferable tax credits, refundable tax credits, low interest loans, direct subsidies, or cash rebates, which are generally calculated based on the amount of money spent in the particular jurisdiction in connection with the production. Each jurisdiction determines the regulations that must be complied with, as well as the conditions that must be satisfied, in order for a production to qualify for the incentive. We intend to use such incentives and/or programs and other structures to further reduce our financial risk in theatrical production.

We may also acquire the rights to films for theatrical release, instead of producing the films ourselves. Our approach to acquiring films for theatrical release will be similar to our approach to film production. We will generally seek to limit our financial exposure in acquiring films while adding films of quality and commercial viability to our release schedule and library.

Theatrical Distribution

In general, the economic life of a motion picture consists of its exploitation in theaters, on packaged media, and on various digital and television platforms in territories around the world. Theatrical distribution refers to the marketing and commercial or retail exploitation of motion pictures. Historically our model has been to distribute motion pictures directly to U.S. movie theaters, however, when the COVID-19 pandemic shut down theaters, we focused on distribution to streaming services such as Netflix, among others. Generally, distributors and exhibitors (theater owners) will enter into agreements whereby the exhibitor retains a portion of the “gross box office receipts,” which are the admissions paid at the box office. The balance is remitted to the distributor. Successful motion pictures may continue to play in theaters for more than three months following their initial release. We may also sell or license rights in all media on a territory-by-territory basis for release in foreign markets. Concurrent with their release in the U.S., motion pictures are generally released in Canada and may also be released in one or more other foreign markets. After the initial theatrical release, distributors seek to maximize revenues by releasing movies in sequential release date windows, which may be exclusive against other non-theatrical distribution channels. In most territories, international theatrical distribution (outside of the U.S. and Canada) generally follows the same cycle as domestic theatrical distribution. Historically, the international distribution cycle would begin a few months after the start of the domestic distribution cycle. However, due, in part, to international box office growth, as well as film piracy in international markets, a much higher percentage of films are being released simultaneously in the U.S. and international markets, or even earlier in certain international markets.

Producing, marketing, and distributing a motion picture can involve significant risks and costs and can cause our financial results to vary depending on the timing of a motion picture’s release. For example, marketing costs are generally incurred before and throughout the theatrical release of a film and, to a lesser extent, other distribution windows, and are expensed as incurred. Therefore, we may incur losses with respect to a particular film prior to and during the film’s theatrical exhibition, and profitability for the film may not be realized until after its theatrical release window. Additionally, there can be no assurance that any of the motion pictures scheduled for release will be completed, that completion will occur in accordance with the anticipated schedule or budget, or that the film will ever be released.

The Company’s business will normally be subject to seasonal variations based on the timing of theatrical motion picture and home entertainment releases. Release dates are determined by several factors, including timing of vacation and holiday periods and competition in the market, but the COVID-19 pandemic changed the historical model and release dates fluctuate more widely than before.

Packaged Media

Packaged media distribution involves the marketing, promotion, and sale and/or lease of DVDs and Blu-ray discs to wholesalers and retailers who then sell or rent the DVDs and Blu-ray discs to consumers for private viewing. For new theatrical titles, home entertainment distribution has traditionally occurred within three to four months of initial theatrical release. However, due in part to new methods of distribution and the rise of new digital platforms and networks, select titles are now being released on video-on-demand (“VOD”) and other digital formats on the same day as the title is theatrically released (a so called “day & date” release strategy). These titles typically release on a modest number of screens for the purpose of positioning VOD and other ancillary platforms. We may also experiment with various other windowing strategies, where, for instance, a title may be released theatrically on several hundred screens, followed by an electronic-sell-through, and premium priced interactive VOD window, followed by release on packaged media, regular priced cable VOD, and later, subscription video-on-demand (“SVOD”). These release strategies are not applicable to every film, and may change based on release patterns, new technologies and product flow.

We intend to distribute or sell content directly to retailers such as Wal-Mart, Best Buy, Target, Costco, and others who buy large volumes of our DVDs and Blu-ray discs to sell directly to consumers. We also intend to directly distribute content to the rental market through Netflix, Amazon, Redbox, and similar providers.

Digital Media

Digital media distribution involves delivering content (including certain titles not available on packaged media) by electronic means directly to consumers through in-home devices (such as set-top boxes from cable, satellite and telco companies, connected or “smart” devices, game consoles, and HDMI dongles) and mobile devices (such as smart phones, tablets, and personal computers). The key distribution methods today, of which we intend to be an active participant, include transactional distribution (such as pay-per-view, electronic-sell-through, transaction video-on-demand, non-transactional distribution (such as SVOD), advertiser-supported VOD, and free VOD) and distribution through various linear pay, basic cable and free television platforms.

Television Production

We intend to enter the television business through the development, production, syndication and distribution of television programming. We intend to generate revenue from the licensing and distribution of such programming to broadcast television networks, pay and basic cable networks, digital platforms and syndicators of first-run programming, which license programs on a station-by-station basis, and pay in cash or via barter (i.e., trade of programming for airtime).

Each of these platforms may acquire a mix of original and library programming. After initial exhibition, we intend to distribute programming to subsequent buyers, both domestically and internationally, including basic cable network, premium subscription services, or digital platforms (known as “off-network syndicated programming”).

Off-network syndicated programming can be sold in successive cycles of sales which may occur on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis. In addition, television programming is sold on home video (packaged media and via digital delivery) and across all other applicable ancillary revenue streams including music publishing, touring and integration. As with film production, we intend to use tax credits, subsidies, and other incentive programs for television production in order to maximize our returns and ensure fiscally responsible production models.

Music Distribution

In 2020, recorded music industry revenue was approximately $8 billion, up by approximately 7.5% from the previous year. However, in recent years, there has been a major shift in distribution of recorded music from physical media to online and streaming distribution, such as through Spotify, which has approximately 180 million premium subscribers. In 2020, a total of 31.6 million physical CDs were shipped in the United States, which marks the lowest total in many years. Meanwhile, streaming services accounted for 83% of the U.S. music industry’s revenue in 2020, up from 79% a year earlier and marking an increase of over 10% percent from 2017. In 2020, revenue from digital album downloads amounted to $319.5 million, less than half the revenue in 2016. However, subscription and streaming revenues have been increasing annually and reached slightly more than $10 billion in 2020, making up the vast majority of revenues for the entire music industry.

Competitive Business Conditions and Competitive Position in the Industry

Television and motion picture production and distribution are highly competitive businesses. We face competition from companies within the entertainment business and from alternative forms of leisure entertainment, such as travel, sporting events, outdoor recreation and other cultural activities. We compete with the major studios, numerous independent motion picture and television production companies, television networks, and pay television systems for the acquisition of literary and film properties, the services of performing artists, directors, producers, and other creative and technical personnel and production financing. In addition, our motion pictures compete for audience acceptance and exhibition outlets with motion pictures produced and distributed by other companies. As a result, the success of any of our motion pictures is dependent not only on the quality and acceptance of a particular picture, but also on the quality and acceptance of other competing motion pictures released into the marketplace at or near the same time.

Given such competition, we will attempt to operate with a different business model than many others. We will emphasize a lower cost structure, risk mitigation, reliance on financial partnerships and innovative financial strategies. Our cost structures will be designed to utilize our flexibility and agility as well as the entrepreneurial spirit of our employees, partners, and affiliates, in order to provide creative entertainment content to serve diverse audiences worldwide.

The success of our businesses depends on our ability to license and produce content for our programming networks that is adequate in quantity and quality and will generate satisfactory viewer ratings. In each of these cases, some of our competitors are large publicly held companies that have greater financial resources than we do. In addition, we compete with these entities for advertising revenue. It is difficult to predict the future effect of technology on many of the factors affecting our competitive position.

Intellectual Property

We intend to create, own, and distribute intellectual property worldwide. Our practice will entail protecting our motion pictures, programs, content, brands, characters, games, publications, and other original and acquired works, and ancillary goods and services. We are fundamentally a content company, and the protection of our brands and entertainment content, and the laws affecting our intellectual property, are of paramount importance to us. We may license our film, television, and music intellectual property for various other ancillary products, such as video games, theatrical stage productions, and clothing.

We do not currently have any intellectual property registered with any government or other public legal authority. We believe that ownership of such copyrights, domain names, and similar intellectual property is an important factor in our business and that our success does depend, in part, on such ownership.

In the United States, under current law, the copyright term for authored works is the life of the author plus 70 years. For works-made-for-hire, the copyright term is the shorter of 95 years from first publication or 120 years from creation.

We intend to achieve worldwide distribution of our film projects, including distribution in Europe, South America, and Asia, by entering into licensing and distribution arrangements with reputable movie distributors. Piracy, including in the digital environment, is extensive in many parts of the world, including South America, Asia, and certain Eastern European countries, and is made easier by technological advances and the conversion of content into digital formats. This trend facilitates the creation, transmission, and sharing of high quality unauthorized copies of content on packaged media and through digital formats. The proliferation of unauthorized copies of these products will likely have an adverse effect on our business, because these products reduce the revenue we receive from our products. To protect our intellectual property assets, we will rely on a combination of copyright, unfair competition, and other laws and contract provisions. However, there can be no assurance of the degree to which these measures will be successful in any given case.

Third parties may challenge the validity or scope of the Company’s intellectual property from time to time, and such challenges could result in the limitation or loss of intellectual property rights. Irrespective of their validity, such claims may result in substantial costs and diversion of resources that could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations. Moreover, effective intellectual property protection may be either unavailable or limited in certain foreign territories. Therefore, the Company will engage in efforts to strengthen and update intellectual property protection around the world, including efforts to ensure the effective enforcement of intellectual property laws and remedies for infringement. We cannot provide assurance that we will prevail in any intellectual property disputes.

Effect of Existing or Probable Governmental Regulations

Our business is subject to and affected by laws and regulations of U.S. federal, state, and local governmental authorities. These laws and regulations are constantly subject to change. The Company does not, however, engage in any activities that cause it to be subject it to any specific laws or regulations other than those that are generally applicable to all businesses.

Internet and Other Media Operator Regulations

The adoption or modification of laws or regulations relating to the internet or other areas of our business could limit or otherwise adversely affect the manner in which we currently conduct our business. For example, recent changes to European law may cause some individual member states to attempt to impose levies and other financial obligations on media operators located outside their jurisdiction. We anticipate that several jurisdictions may, over time, attempt to impose additional financial and regulatory obligations on us. In addition, the continued growth and development of the market for online commerce may lead to more stringent consumer protection laws, which may impose additional burdens on us. If we are required to comply with new regulations or legislation or new interpretations of existing regulations or legislation, this compliance could cause us to incur additional expenses or alter our business model.

Changes in laws or regulations that adversely affect the growth, popularity or use of the internet, including laws impacting net neutrality, could decrease the demand for our service and increase our cost of doing business. Given uncertainty around these rules, including changing interpretations, amendments or repeal, coupled with potentially significant political and economic power of local network operators, we could experience discriminatory or anti-competitive practices that could impede our growth, cause us to incur additional expense or otherwise negatively affect our business.

Employees

As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, the Company had seven employees, all of whom are full time. We hire additional employees on a picture-by-picture basis in connection with the production of our motion pictures and television programming. We believe that our employee and labor relations are good. None of our full-time employees are members of unions.

Many film and television productions employ members of a number of unions, including the International Alliance of Theatrical and Stage Employees and Teamsters. If we were to employ union members, a strike by one or more of the unions that provide personnel essential to the production of motion pictures or television programs could delay or halt our ongoing production activities. Such a halt or delay, depending on the length of time involved, could cause delay or interruption in our release of new motion pictures and television programs and thereby could adversely affect our cash flow and revenues.

Further Information

Our website is www.rivuletmedia.com. We are subject to the information reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and, accordingly, file periodic reports, including quarterly and annual reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such reports and other information are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC, and may also be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy, and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically. The SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following factors regarding information included in this report on Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

The Company is subject to various risks that may materially harm its business, financial condition, and results of operations. The risks and uncertainties described below, while inclusive of all risks we believe to be material at this time, may not be the only ones. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, the Company’s business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. Except for historical information, the information contained in these risk factors and in our SEC reports are “forward looking” statements about our expected future business and performance. Our actual operating results and financial performance may prove to be very different from what we might have predicted as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K.

General risks related to our business

We will need to raise significant additional capital. The Company needs substantial capital to make and produce motion pictures currently in development or production, to meet payroll and to pay professional fees as a public company. The Company has not established any external sources of liquidity with financial institutions or other unrelated third parties. While the Company has a line of credit with several related parties, the Company has not been able to establish any external sources of financing. As the Company has no sources of financing other than periodic offerings of short-term notes and common stock to various high net worth individuals, the Company may not have enough funds to continue its operations, and may have to significantly curtail operations and sell films at reduced prices to generate cash.

The Company estimates that ongoing significant amounts of capital will be necessary over a sustained period of time to advance the development of the Company’s business activities to the point at which it can become commercially viable and self-sustaining. To finance our production of films, we often raise capital with short-term notes and the maturity date of those notes often occurs before we have sold and distributed our films and we therefore must defer payment of those notes as well as defer payroll on numerous occasions, which results in delayed payments to our creditors and service providers. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will successfully defer paying its creditors and service providers, and as we raise capital through additional equity financing, existing stockholders will have their ownership interests diluted. Until we generate revenues from the sale of our films, we will be solely relying on short-term notes and the sale of our common stock. As the Company has over $2 million in notes that are in default, there is no assurance that we can continue to defer payment, some of which has been deferred for over one year. As investors in our common stock typically are not interested in funding debt payments, deferral of these payments may be our sole option to allow us to raise capital for production of our films.

Our Independent Auditor Has Expressed Substantial Doubt About Us Continuing as a Going Concern. Management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in its report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended July 31, 2021, also expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional funds and successfully implement its business plan, and to ultimately achieve sustainable operating revenues and profitability, and there is no assurance this will occur.

The development and expansion of the Company’s business is dependent on many factors, including the capital resources available to the Company. No assurances can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that they will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or adequate to fund the development and expansion of the Company’s business operations to a level that is commercially viable and self-sustaining. Furthermore, the Company has numerous short-term notes that it has been forced to defer and if it cannot continue to defer these notes and they all become due, it may be forced into insolvency if it cannot raise capital to repay them.

If cash resources are insufficient to satisfy the Company’s ongoing cash requirements, the Company may be required to scale back its operations, liquidate its media assets to obtain funds, enter into strategic alliances that may require the Company to relinquish rights to any assets, or discontinue its operations entirely.

Several Notes Defaults Require Capital Raises to Repay Them. The Company has defaulted on several debt obligations and much of the capital it is raising will go to repay that indebtedness. The Company is in default under a note payable to Rachelle Strole in the original principal amount of $400,000 and must raise capital to repay this note. The Company is also in default under 19 separate notes payable to 7 individuals in the aggregate original principal amount of $2,275,000 with outstanding balances due totaling $1,965,000. The Company must raise capital to repay these notes.

If negotiations with our creditors fail to result in a deferral of this indebtedness and these note holders obtain a default judgement against the Company and we are forced into insolvency, our stockholders’ common stock will become worthless.

Current management has not yet retained the financial and accounting staff necessary to conform to the checks and balances needed for proper internal controls, as well as with the technical competence and accounting experience to address accounting and reporting issues under US GAAP and SEC reporting standards. We are required to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting annually. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, management has not yet retained the financial and accounting staff necessary to conform to the checks and balances needed for proper internal controls. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our auditors are unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our common stock to decline. We cannot give any assurance as to when, if ever, we will obtain proper internal controls.

The Company is largely controlled by two stockholders, and thus other stockholders have limited oversight of the Board of Directors; Officer salaries are significant. Two stockholders, Klusman Family Holdings and Debbie Rasmussen (wife of Mike Witherill), hold a significant number of shares of common stock of the Company. As a result, other stockholders will largely be unable to exercise any direct management or control functions with respect to the Company’s operations. The Board of Directors is elected by the stockholders and has discretion over a wide variety of decisions. Since a significant number of shares are held by two stockholders, other stockholders may have little if any ability to influence the election of directors. As officer salaries are determined entirely by the Board of Directors, there is no assurance they will reflect market rates of similarly situated companies. Aaron Klusman, our CEO, and Mike Witherill, our President, have salaries of $360,000 per year, so a significant portion of capital raises will be used to pay their salaries, although as of July 31, 2021, Mr. Klusman had deferred $484,670 of his salary. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, Mr. Klusman’s deferred compensation is now $775,325. The Board of Directors determines how to allocate all proceeds raised by the Company and a portion of the proceeds will go to pay deferred.

We rely heavily on our management to become profitable. There can be no assurance that we will be profitable in the future.

Although our President and the President of Rivulet Films each have substantial business experience in the motion picture industry, our CEO has no experience in the motion picture industry and thus there can be no assurance that he will be successful in managing the Company and implementing our business plan. Our President was an officer of two prior film production companies which filed for bankruptcy as those companies were not able to pay their debt obligations when they were due. The likelihood of the Company’s success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays frequently encountered in connection with the startup of new businesses and the environment in which the Company operates. 

As a result of our limited operating history, our plan for growth, and the competitive nature of the markets in which we plan to compete, we cannot accurately predict the Company’s future revenue, capital requirements, and operating expenses. We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall in revenue. Our operating expenses may increase significantly. To the extent that these expenses precede or are not rapidly followed by a corresponding increase in revenue or additional sources of financing, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

If we acquire, combine with or invest in other businesses, we will face certain risks inherent in such transactions. We have in the past considered and will continue, from time to time, to consider, opportunistic strategic transactions, which could involve acquisitions, combinations or dispositions of businesses or assets, or strategic alliances or joint ventures with companies engaged in businesses that are similar or complementary to ours. Any such strategic combination could be material, be difficult to implement, disrupt our business or change our business profile significantly. Any future strategic transaction could involve numerous risks, including:

If we enter into significant strategic transactions in the future, related accounting charges may affect our financial condition and results of operations, particularly in the case of any acquisitions. In addition, the financing of any significant acquisition may result in changes in our capital structure, including the incurrence of additional indebtedness. Conversely, any material disposition could reduce our indebtedness or require the amendment or refinancing of our outstanding indebtedness or a portion thereof. We may not be successful in addressing these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with any strategic transactions. We cannot be sure that if we make any future acquisitions, investments, strategic alliances, or joint ventures or enter into any business combination that they will be completed in a timely manner, or at all, that they will be structured or financed in a way that will enhance our creditworthiness or that they will meet our strategic objectives or otherwise be successful. We also may not be successful in implementing appropriate operational, financial, and management systems and controls to achieve the benefits expected to result from these transactions. Failure to effectively manage any of these transactions could result in material increases in costs or reductions in expected revenues, or both. In addition, if any new business in which we invest or which we attempt to develop does not progress as planned, we may not recover the funds and resources we have expended and this could have a negative impact on our businesses or our company as a whole.

The coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. The global outbreak of COVID-19 and its variants has led to severe disruptions in general economic activities, as businesses and governments have taken broad actions to mitigate this public health crisis. Although the Company has not experienced any significant disruption to its business to date, these conditions could significantly negatively impact the Company’s business in the future.

The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak and its variants ultimately impacts the Company’s business, future revenues, results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak, the emergence of additional variants, its severity and longevity, the actions to curtail the virus and treat its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. Although the COVID-19 outbreak appears to be subsiding, the Company may be at risk of experiencing a significant impact to its business as a result of the global economic impact, including any economic downturn or recession that has occurred or may occur in the future if there is a significant resurgence of COVID-19 cases.

There is also significant uncertainty as to the effect that the coronavirus may have on the amount and type of financing available to the Company in the future. The Company intends to continue to monitor the situation and may adjust its current business plans as more information and guidance become available.

Motion Picture and Television Industry Risks

Our business requires a substantial investment of capital. The production, acquisition, and distribution of motion pictures and television programs requires a significant amount of capital. A significant amount of time may elapse between the Company’s expenditure of funds and the receipt of revenues from its motion pictures or television programs. This time lapse may require the Company to fund a significant portion of its capital requirements from its financing sources. Although the Company intends to reduce the risks of its production exposure through financial contributions from distributors, tax credit programs, government and industry programs, other studios and co-financiers and other sources, the Company cannot be sure that it will be able to successfully implement these arrangements or that it will not be subject to substantial financial risks relating to the production, acquisition, completion, and release of future motion pictures and television programs. In addition, if the Company increases (through internal growth or acquisition) its production slate or its production budgets, the Company may be required to increase overhead and/or make larger up-front payments to talent and, consequently, bear greater financial risks. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity, and prospects.

The costs of producing and marketing feature films is high and may increase in the future, and the uncertainties inherent in their production could result in the expenditure of significant amounts on films that are abandoned or significantly delayed. Films are expensive to produce. The production, completion, and distribution of feature films is subject to a number of uncertainties, including delays and increased expenditures due to creative problems, technical difficulties, talent availability, accidents, natural disasters, or other events beyond the Company’s control. Because of these uncertainties, the projected costs of a feature film at the time it is set for production may increase, the date of completion may be substantially delayed or the film may be abandoned due to the exigencies of production. In extreme cases, a film in production may be abandoned or significantly modified (including as a result of creative changes) after substantial amounts have been spent, causing the write-off of expenses incurred with respect to the film and failure to pay notes with very high interest rates. A default on these notes may subject us to ongoing claims or litigation against not only the Company but also extend the notes to any personal guarantees executed by management.

The costs of producing and marketing feature films generally increase from year to year, which may make it more difficult for the Company’s films to generate a profit or compete against other films. Revenues may not be sufficient to offset an increase in the cost of motion picture production and marketing, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity, and prospects.

Budget overruns may adversely affect the Company’s business. While the Company’s business model requires that it be efficient in the production of its motion pictures, actual motion picture production costs may exceed their budgets. The production, completion, and distribution of motion pictures can be subject to a number of uncertainties, including delays and increased expenditures due to disruptions or events beyond the Company’s control. As a result, if a motion picture incurs substantial budget overruns, the Company may have to seek additional financing from outside sources to complete production or fund the overrun itself. The Company cannot make assurances regarding the availability of such financing or on terms acceptable to the Company, nor can the Company be sure that it will recoup these costs. Increased costs incurred with respect to a particular film may result in any such film not being ready for release at the intended time and the postponement to a potentially less favorable date, all of which could cause a decline in box office performance, and, thus, the overall financial success of such film. Budget overruns could also prevent a picture from being completed or released. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity, and prospects.

Limitations on control of joint ventures may adversely impact Company operations. The Company may hold interests in certain businesses as a joint venture or in partnership with non-affiliated third parties. As a result of such arrangements, the Company may be unable to control the operations, strategies and financial decisions of such joint venture or partnership entities which could, in turn, result in limitations on the Company’s ability to implement strategies that the Company may favor and may limit the Company’s ability to transfer its interests. Consequently, any losses experienced by these entities could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations and the value of the Company’s investment.

The Company’s success depends on the commercial success of motion pictures, which is unpredictable. Generally, the popularity of the Company’s motion pictures depends on many factors, including the critical acclaim they receive, the format of their initial release (for example, theatrical or direct-to-video), their actors and other key talent, their genre and their specific subject matter, audience reaction, the quality and acceptance of motion pictures that its competitors release into the marketplace at or near the same time, critical reviews, the availability of alternative forms of entertainment and leisure activities, general economic conditions and other tangible and intangible factors, many of which the Company does not control and all of which may change. The Company cannot predict the future effects of these factors with certainty. In addition, because a motion picture’s performance in ancillary markets, such as home video and pay and free television, is often directly related to its box office performance or television ratings, poor box office results ratings may negatively affect future revenue streams. The Company’s success will depend on the experience and judgment of the Company’s management to select and develop new investment and production opportunities. The Company cannot make assurances that the Company’s motion pictures will obtain favorable reviews or ratings or that the Company’s motion pictures will perform well at the box office or in ancillary markets. The failure to achieve any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity, and prospects.

A variety of uncontrollable events may reduce demand for the Company’s entertainment products or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s business. Demand for Company products is highly dependent on the general environment for entertainment and other leisure activities. The environment for these activities can be significantly adversely affected in the U.S. or worldwide as a result of a variety of factors beyond the Company’s control, including pandemics or epidemics, terrorist activities, military actions, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, or other health concerns. Such events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. Similarly, an outbreak of a particular infectious disease such as COVID-19 or a new variant could negatively affect the public’s willingness to see the Company’s films in theaters. Finally, the ongoing effects of global climate change could adversely affect the Company’s business. Various proposals have been discussed at the federal and state level to limit the carbon emissions of business enterprises, which if enacted could result in an increase in the Company’s costs of operations. The effects of climate change could also have unpredictable effects on consumer motion picture attendance patterns.

Changes in the United States, global or regional economic conditions could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. The global economy experienced a significant contraction in the past. Any future decrease in economic activity in the U.S. or in other regions of the world in which the Company does business could significantly and adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition in a number of ways. Any decline in economic conditions may reduce the performance of the Company’s theatrical releases, thereby reducing the Company’s revenues and earnings. Further, bankruptcies or similar events by theater chains, other participants in the Company’s distribution chain or other sources of revenue may cause the Company to incur bad debt expense at levels higher than historically experienced or otherwise cause the Company’s revenues to decrease. In periods of generally increasing prices which is occurring now with substantial inflation in numerous products, commodities and services, the Company may experience a shift in consumer demand away from the entertainment products the Company offers, which could also adversely affect the Company’s revenues and, at the same time, increase the Company’s costs.

Licensed distributors’ failure to promote the Company’s programs may adversely affect the Company’s business. The Company generally does not control the timing and manner in which the Company’s licensed distributors distribute the Company’s motion pictures; their decisions regarding the timing of release and promotional support are important in determining success. Any decision by those distributors not to distribute or promote one of the Company’s motion pictures or to promote the Company’s competitors’ motion pictures to a greater extent than they promote ours could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

The Company could be adversely affected by strikes or other union job actions. The Company is directly or indirectly dependent upon highly specialized union members who are essential to the production of motion pictures. A strike by, or a lockout of, one or more of the unions that provide personnel essential to the production of motion pictures could delay or halt the Company’s production activities, or could cause a delay or interruption in our release of new motion pictures, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity, and prospects.

The Company’s success is primarily dependent on audience acceptance of its films, which is extremely difficult to predict and, therefore, inherently risky. The Company cannot predict the economic success of any of the Company’s motion pictures because the revenue derived from the distribution of a motion picture (which does not necessarily directly correlate with the production or distribution costs incurred) depends primarily upon its acceptance by the public, which cannot be accurately predicted. The economic success of a motion picture also depends upon the public’s acceptance of competing films, the availability of alternative forms of entertainment and leisure-time activities, general economic conditions, and other tangible and intangible factors, all of which can change and cannot be predicted with certainty.

The economic success of a motion picture is largely determined by the Company’s ability to produce content and develop stories that appeal to a broad audience and by the effective marketing of the motion picture. The theatrical performance of a film is a key factor in predicting revenue from post-theatrical markets. If the Company is unable to accurately judge audience acceptance of the Company’s film content or to have the film effectively marketed, the commercial success of the film will be in doubt, which could result in costs not being recouped or anticipated profits not being realized. Moreover, the Company cannot be sure that any particular feature film will generate enough revenue to offset its distribution, fulfillment services and marketing costs, in which case the Company would not receive any revenues for such film from its distributors.

The Company’s business is currently substantially dependent upon the success of a limited number of film releases each year and the unexpected delay or commercial failure of any one of them could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results and cash flows. The Company generally expects to release one or two feature films per year. The unexpected delay in release or commercial failure of just one of these films could have a significant adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows in both the year of release and in the future. Historically, feature films that are successful in the domestic theatrical market are generally also successful in the international theatrical, home entertainment and television markets, although each film is different and there is no way to guarantee such results. If the Company’s films fail to achieve domestic box office success, their international box office and home entertainment success and the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. Further, the Company can make no assurances that the historical correlation between domestic box office results and international box office and home entertainment results will continue in the future. In fact, over the last several years’ domestic theatrical results and foreign theatrical results have become less directly correlated than in the past.

The Company faces substantial competition in all aspects of its business. Motion picture and television production and distribution are highly competitive businesses. The Company faces competition from companies within the entertainment business and from alternative forms of leisure entertainment, such as travel, sporting events, outdoor recreation, video games, the internet and other cultural and computer-related activities. The Company competes with the major studios, numerous independent motion picture production companies, television networks, pay television systems and digital media platforms for the acquisition of literary and film properties, the services of performing artists, directors, producers and other creative and technical personnel and production financing, all of which are essential to the success of the Company’s entertainment businesses. In addition, the Company’s motion pictures compete for audience acceptance and exhibition outlets with motion pictures produced and distributed by other companies.

As a result, the success of any of the Company’s motion pictures is dependent not only on the quality and acceptance of a particular film, but also on the quality and acceptance of other competing motion pictures released into the marketplace at or near the same time. Given such competition, the Company operates with a different business model than many others. The Company typically emphasizes a lower cost structure, risk mitigation, reliance on financial partnerships and innovative financial strategies. The Company’s cost structures are designed to utilize the Company’s flexibility and agility as well as the entrepreneurial spirit of the Company’s employees, partners and affiliates, in order to provide creative entertainment content to serve diverse audiences worldwide.

The Company is smaller and less diversified than many of its competitors. Unlike the Company, an independent distributor and producer, most of the major U.S. studios are part of large diversified corporate groups with a variety of other operations, including television networks and cable channels that can provide both the means of distributing their products and stable sources of earnings that may allow them to better offset fluctuations in the financial performance of their motion picture operations. In addition, the major studios have more resources with which to compete for ideas, storylines and scripts created by third parties as well as for actors, directors and other personnel required for production. The resources of the major studios may also give them an advantage in acquiring other businesses or assets, including film libraries, that the Company might also be interested in acquiring.

The motion picture industry is highly competitive and at times may create an oversupply of motion pictures in the market. The number of motion pictures released by the Company’s competitors, particularly the major studios, may create an oversupply of product in the market, reduce the Company’s share of box office receipts and make it more difficult for the Company’s films to succeed commercially. The limited supply of motion picture screens compounds this product oversupply problem. Oversupply may become most pronounced during peak release times, such as school holidays and national holidays, when theater attendance is expected to be highest. As a result of changes in the theatrical exhibition industry, including reorganizations and consolidations, and major studio releases occupying more screens, the number of screens available to the Company when the Company wants to release a picture may decrease. If the number of motion picture screens decreases, box office receipts, and the correlating future revenue streams, such as from home entertainment and pay and free television, of the Company’s motion pictures may also decrease. Although the Company seeks to release its films during peak release times, the Company cannot guarantee that it will be able to release all of its films during those times and, therefore, may miss potentially higher gross box-office receipts. In addition, a substantial majority of the motion picture screens in the U.S. typically are committed at any one time to only 10 to 15 films distributed nationally by major studio distributors. If the Company’s competitors were to increase the number of films available for distribution and the number of exhibition screens remained unchanged, it could be more difficult for the Company to release its films during optimal release periods. Moreover, the Company cannot guarantee that the Company can release all of its films when they are otherwise scheduled due to production or other delays, or a change in the schedule of a major studio. Any such change could adversely impact a film’s financial performance. In addition, if the Company cannot change the Company’s schedule after such a change by a major studio because the Company is too close to the release date, the major studio’s release and its typically larger promotion budget may adversely impact the financial performance of the Company’s films.

Other risks in the motion picture industry

The Company must successfully respond to rapid technological changes and alternative forms of delivery or storage to remain competitive. The entertainment industry in general continues to undergo significant developments as advances in technologies and new methods of product delivery and storage, or certain changes in consumer behavior driven by these developments, emerge. Consumers are spending an increasing amount of time on the internet and on mobile devices, and are increasingly viewing content on a time-delayed or on-demand basis from the internet, on their televisions and on handheld or portable devices. If the Company cannot successfully exploit these and other emerging technologies, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

Global economic turmoil and inflationary economic conditions in the U.S. could adversely affect the Company’s business. Global economic turmoil may cause a general tightening in the credit markets, lower levels of liquidity, increases in the rates of default and bankruptcy, levels of intervention from the U.S. federal government and other foreign governments, decreased consumer confidence, overall slower economic activity and extreme volatility in credit, equity and fixed income markets. Currently, due to the war in Ukraine and supply chain problems created by the COVID-19 past shutdowns, the world economy is experiencing inflationary pressures not seen in forty (40) years. These inflationary pressures in the U.S. and in other regions of the world in which the Company does business could adversely affect demand for the Company’s films, thus reducing the Company’s revenues and earnings. Ongoing inflation could reduce performance of the Company’s theatrical releases. Shifts in consumer demand away from the entertainment the Company offers (such as is currently taking place as people return to the workforce following quarantine due to the spread of COVID-19 and as a result watch fewer movies), which could also adversely affect the Company’s revenues and, at the same time, increase the Company’s costs. Moreover, financial institution failures may cause the Company to incur increased expenses or make it more difficult to finance any future acquisitions, or engage in other financing activities. The Company cannot predict the timing or the duration of any inflation or downturn in the economy and the Company is not immune to the effects of general worldwide economic conditions.

The Company’s operating results can fluctuate significantly. The Company expects significant fluctuations in the Company’s future quarterly and annual operating results because of a variety of factors, including the following:

The Company may incur significant write-offs if its feature films and other projects do not perform well enough to recoup production, marketing and distribution costs. The Company is required to amortize capitalized production costs over the expected revenue streams as the Company recognizes revenue from the associated films or other projects. The amount of production costs that will be amortized each quarter depends on, among other things, how much future revenue the Company expected to receive from each project. Unamortized production costs are evaluated for impairment each reporting period on a project-by-project basis. If estimated remaining revenue is not sufficient to recover the unamortized production costs, the unamortized production costs will be written down to fair value. In any given quarter, if the Company lowers its previous forecast with respect to total anticipated revenue from any individual feature film or other project, the Company may be required to accelerate amortization or record impairment charges with respect to the unamortized costs, even if the Company has previously recorded impairment charges for such film or other project. Such accelerated amortization or impairment charges would adversely impact the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Business interruptions could adversely affect the Company’s operations. The Company’s operations are vulnerable to outages and interruptions due to fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures and similar events beyond the Company’s control. A long-term power outage could disrupt the Company’s operations. Prices for electricity have in the past risen dramatically and may increase in the future. An increase in prices would increase the Company’s operating costs, which could in turn adversely affect the Company’s profitability. There can be no assurance that insurance procured by the Company for completion of its motion pictures will be sufficient to compensate the Company for losses that may occur or that such insurance may continue to be available on affordable terms. Any losses or damages incurred by the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

The Company faces risks from doing business internationally. The Company intends to contract with distributors that distribute motion picture and television productions outside the U.S. through various output agreement and third party licensees, and derives revenues from these sources. At the present time, no such distribution agreements are in place. However, when international distribution contracts are entered into, the Company’s business will be subject to certain risks inherent in international business, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. These risks include:

Events or developments related to these and other risks associated with international trade could adversely affect the Company’s revenues from non-U.S. sources, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

The seasonality of the Company’s businesses could exacerbate negative impacts on its operations. The Company’s business will normally be subject to seasonal variations based on the timing of theatrical motion picture and home entertainment releases. Release dates are determined by several factors, including timing of vacation and holiday periods and competition in the market. Also, revenues in the Company’s consumer products business will be influenced by both seasonal consumer purchasing behavior and the timing of theatrical releases and generally peak in the fiscal quarter of a film’s theatrical release. Accordingly, if a short-term negative impact on the Company’s business occurs during a time of high seasonal demand (such as natural disaster or a terrorist attack during the time of one of the Company’s theatrical or home entertainment releases), the effect could have a disproportionate effect on the Company’s results for the year.

The Company’s success depends on its President and certain key employees. The Company success will depend to a significant extent on the connections, reputation, expertise and performance of primarily its President, its President of Rivulet Films, Inc., and its production and creative personnel. The Company does not currently have any “key person” life insurance policies on its President, or any of its employees. Competition for the limited number of business, production and creative personnel necessary to create and distribute the Company’s entertainment content is intense and may grow in the future. The Company’s inability to retain or successfully replace, where necessary, its President, and other key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects. Also, the CEO and President of Rivulet Films, Inc. and other officers are not required to devote their full time to the Company and may have conflicting time commitments to other entities in the same industry.

To be successful, the Company needs to attract and retain qualified personnel. The Company’s success continues to depend to a significant extent on its ability to identify, attract, hire, train and retain qualified professional, creative, technical and managerial personnel. Competition for the caliber of talent required to produce and distribute Company motion pictures continues to increase. The Company cannot be sure that it will be successful in identifying, attracting, hiring, training and retaining such personnel in the future. If the Company was unable to hire, assimilate and retain qualified personnel in the future, such inability would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

Intellectual property risks and risks of litigation and other liability

Protecting and defending against intellectual property claims may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Our future ability to compete will depend, in part, upon successful protection of the Company’s intellectual property. The Company will attempt to protect proprietary and intellectual property rights to the Company’s productions through available copyright laws and licensing and distribution arrangements with reputable international companies in specific territories and media for limited durations. Despite these precautions, existing copyright laws afford only limited practical protection in certain countries where the Company’s motion pictures are distributed. As a result, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy and distribute the Company’s productions or certain portions or applications of the Company’s intended productions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

Litigation may also be necessary to enforce the Company’s intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Any such litigation, infringement or invalidity claims could result in substantial costs and the diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects. The Company cannot be sure that infringement or invalidity claims will not materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

Copyright protection is a serious problem in the home entertainment distribution industry because of the ease with which DVDs and Blu-ray discs may be duplicated. Video piracy continues to be prevalent across the entertainment industry. The Company may take legal actions to enforce copyright protection when necessary.

The Company’s more successful and popular film products may experience higher levels of infringing activity, particularly around key release dates. Alleged infringers may claim that their products are permitted under fair use or similar doctrines, that they are entitled to compensatory or punitive damages because the Company’s efforts to protect its intellectual property rights are illegal or improper, and that the Company’s significant intellectual property are invalid. Such claims, even if meritless, may result in adverse publicity or costly litigation. The Company intends to vigorously defend the Company’s copyrights from infringing products and activity, which can result in litigation. The Company may receive unfavorable preliminary or interim rulings in the course of litigation, and there can be no assurance that a favorable final outcome will be obtained in all cases. Regardless of the validity or the success of the assertion of any such claims, The Company could incur significant costs and diversion of resources in enforcing the Company’s intellectual property rights or in defending against such claims, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

Others may assert intellectual property infringement claims against the Company. One of the risks of the motion picture business is the possibility that others may claim that the Company’s productions and production techniques misappropriate or infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties with respect to their previously developed films, series, stories, characters, other entertainment or intellectual property. Irrespective of the validity or the successful assertion of such claims, the Company could incur significant costs and diversion of resources in defending against them, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

The Company’s business involves risks of liability claims for media content, which could adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition. As a distributor of media content, the Company may face potential liability for:

These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against producers and distributors of media content. Any imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.

Piracy of motion pictures may reduce the gross receipts from the exploitation of the Company’s films. Motion picture piracy is extensive in many parts of the world, including South America, Asia, and certain Eastern European countries, and is made easier by technological advances and the conversion of motion pictures into digital formats. This trend facilitates the creation, transmission and sharing of high quality unauthorized copies of motion pictures in theatrical release on DVDs, Blu-ray discs, from pay-per-view through set-top boxes and other devices and through unlicensed broadcasts on free television and the internet. The proliferation of unauthorized copies of these products will likely have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, because these products reduce the revenue the Company receives from the Company’s productions. Additionally, in order to contain this problem, the Company may have to implement elaborate and costly security and anti-piracy measures, which could result in significant expenses and losses of revenue. The Company cannot be sure that even the highest levels of security and anti-piracy measures will prevent piracy.

In particular, unauthorized copying and piracy are prevalent in countries outside of the U.S., Canada and Western Europe, whose legal systems may make it difficult for the Company to enforce intellectual property rights. While the U.S. government has publicly considered implementing trade sanctions against specific countries that, in its opinion, do not make appropriate efforts to prevent copyright infringements of U.S. produced motion pictures, there can be no assurance that any such sanctions will be enacted or, if enacted, will be effective. In addition, if enacted, such sanctions could impact the amount of revenue that the Company realizes from the international exploitation of motion pictures. If no embargoes or sanctions are enacted, or if other measures are not taken, the Company may lose revenue as a result of motion picture piracy.

The increased consumer acceptance of entertainment content delivered electronically and consumer acquisition of the hardware and software for facilitating electronic delivery may also lead to greater public acceptance of unauthorized content. The Company’s distributors will be substantially responsible for enforcing the Company’s intellectual property rights with respect to all of the Company’s films subject to the Company’s distribution agreements and are required to maintain security and anti-piracy measures consistent with the highest levels each maintains for its own motion pictures in each territory in the world. Other than the remedies the Company has in such agreements, the Company has no way of requiring its distributors to take any anti-piracy actions, and the Company’s distributors’ failure to take such actions may result in the Company having to undertake such measures itself, which could result in significant expenses and losses of indeterminate amounts of revenue. Even if applied, there can be no assurance that the highest levels of security and anti-piracy measures will prevent piracy.

Music Industry Risks

The recorded music industry has been declining and may continue to decline, which may adversely affect our prospects and our results of operations. The recorded music industry has experienced negative growth rates on a global basis since 1999 and the worldwide recorded music market has contracted considerably. Illegal downloading of music, CD piracy, industrial piracy, economic recession, bankruptcies of record wholesalers and retailers, and growing competition for consumer discretionary spending and retail shelf space may have all contributed to the decline in the recorded music industry. Additionally, the period of growth in recorded music sales driven by the introduction and penetration of the CD format has long ended. While CD sales still generate a significant portion of the recorded music revenues globally, CD sales continue to decline industry-wide and we expect that trend to continue. However, new formats for selling recorded music product have been created, including the legal downloading and streaming of digital music and revenue streams from these new channels have emerged. These new digital revenue streams are important as they are partially offsetting declines in physical sales and represent a growing area of the business. However, the industry continues to be negatively impacted as a result of ongoing digital piracy and the transition from physical to digital sales in the recorded music business. While it is believed within the recorded music industry that growth in digital revenues will reestablish a growth pattern for recorded music sales, the timing of the recovery cannot be established with accuracy nor can it be determined how these changes will affect individual markets. A declining recorded music industry is also likely to have a negative impact on the music publishing business. Digital downloads remain a key revenue stream for the recorded music industry, and there has been ample growth in the streaming category, resulting in the latter’s increasing contribution to overall industry digital revenues.

There may be downward pressure on our pricing and our profit margins and reductions in shelf space. There are a variety of factors that could cause us to reduce our prices and reduce our profit margins. They are, among others, the negotiating leverage of mass merchandisers, big-box retailers and distributors of digital music, the increased costs of doing business with mass merchandisers and big-box retailers as a result of complying with operating procedures that are unique to their needs and any changes in costs or profit margins associated with new digital business, including the impact of ad-supported music services, some of which may be able to avail themselves of “safe harbor” defenses against copyright infringement actions under copyright laws. In addition, we will be dependent on a small number of leading digital music services, which allows them to significantly influence the prices we can charge in connection with the distribution of digital music. Over the course of the last decade, U.S. mass-market and other stores’ share of U.S. physical music sales has continued to grow. While we cannot predict how future competition will impact music retailers, as the music industry continues to transform it is possible that the share of music sales by a small number of leading mass-market retailers such as Wal-Mart and Target and digital music services such as Apple’s iTunes and Google Play will continue to grow, which could further increase their negotiating leverage and put pressure on profit margins.

Our prospects and financial results may be adversely affected if we fail to identify, sign, and retain artists and songwriters and by the existence or absence of superstar releases and by local economic conditions in the countries in which we operate. We are dependent on identifying, signing, and retaining recording artists with long-term potential, whose debut albums are well received on release, whose subsequent albums are anticipated by consumers and whose music will continue to generate sales for years to come. The competition among record companies for such talent is intense. Competition among record companies to sell records is also intense. We are also dependent on signing and retaining songwriters who will write the hit songs of today and the classics of tomorrow. Our competitive position is dependent on our ability to attract and develop artists whose work can achieve a high degree of public acceptance. Our financial results may be adversely affected if we are unable to identify, sign, and retain such artists under terms that are economically attractive to us. Our financial results may also be affected by the existence or absence of superstar artist releases during a particular period. Some music industry observers believe that the number of superstar acts with long-term appeal, both in terms of catalog sales and future releases, has declined in recent years. Additionally, our financial results are generally affected by the worldwide economic and retail environment.

We may have difficulty addressing the threats to our business associated with home copying and digital downloading. The combined effect of the decreasing cost of electronic and computer equipment and related technology such as CD burners and the conversion of music into digital formats have made it easier for consumers to obtain and create unauthorized copies of recordings in the form of, for example, “burned” CDs and MP3 files. A significant number of Internet users globally access unauthorized digital sites/services on desktop-based devices on a regular basis. In addition, while growth of music-enabled mobile consumers offers distinct opportunities for music companies such as ours, it also opens the market up to risks from behaviors such as “sideloading” and mobile app-based downloading of unauthorized content and illegitimate user-created ringtones. A substantial portion of our revenue will come from the sale of audio products that are potentially subject to unauthorized consumer copying and widespread digital dissemination without an economic return to us. The impact of digital piracy on legitimate music sales is hard to quantify but we believe that illegal filesharing has a substantial negative impact on music sales.

Organized industrial piracy may lead to decreased sales. The global organized commercial pirate trade is a significant threat to content industries, including the music sector. A 2011 study by Frontier Economics cited by IFPI, estimates that digitally pirated music, motion pictures and software is valued at $30 billion to $75 billion and IFPI’s 2014 Digital Music Report valued advertising revenues generated by piracy sites at $227 million. In addition, a 2010 economic study conducted by Tera Consultants in Europe found that if left unabated, digital piracy could result in an estimated loss of 240 billion Euros in retail revenues for the creative industries—including music—in Europe over the period from 2008 to 2015. Unauthorized copies and piracy have contributed to the decrease in the volume of legitimate sales. They will have an adverse effect on our business.

We will be substantially dependent on a limited number of digital music services, in particular Apple’s iTunes Music Store, for the online sale of our music recordings and they are able to significantly influence the pricing structure for online music stores. We will derive an increasing portion of our revenues from sales of music through digital distribution channels. We are currently dependent on a small number of leading digital music services that sell consumers digital music. Currently, the largest U.S. online music store, iTunes, typically charges U.S. consumers prices ranging from $0.69 to $1.29 per single-track download. We have limited ability to increase our wholesale prices to digital service providers for digital downloads as Apple’s iTunes controls 65%-75% of the legitimate digital music track download business in the United States according to third-party estimates. If Apple’s iTunes were to adopt a lower pricing model or if there were structural changes to other download pricing models, we may receive substantially less per download for our music, which could cause a material reduction in our revenues, unless it is offset by a corresponding increase in the number of downloads. Additionally, Apple’s iTunes and other digital music services at present accept and make available for sale all the recordings that we and other distributors deliver to them. However, if digital music services in the future decide to limit the types or amount of music they will accept from music-based content owners like us, our revenues could be significantly reduced.

We may be unable to compete successfully in the highly competitive markets in which we operate and we may suffer reduced profits as a result. The industries in which we operate are highly competitive, have experienced ongoing consolidation among major music companies, are based on consumer preferences and are rapidly changing. Additionally, they require substantial human and capital resources. We compete with other recorded music companies and music publishers to identify and sign new recording artists and songwriters who subsequently achieve long-term success and to renew agreements with established artists and songwriters. In addition, our competitors may from time to time increase the amounts they spend to lure, or to market and promote, recording artists and songwriters or reduce the prices of their products in an effort to expand market share. We may lose business if we are unable to sign successful recording artists or songwriters or to match the prices of the products offered by our competitors. Our music publishing business competes not only with other music publishing companies, but also with songwriters who publish their own works. Our business is to a large extent dependent on technological developments, including access to and selection and viability of new technologies, and is subject to potential pressure from competitors as a result of their technological developments. For example, our recorded music business may be further adversely affected by technological developments that facilitate the piracy of music, by an inability to enforce our intellectual property rights in digital environments, and by a failure to develop successful business models applicable to a digital environment. Our business also faces competition from other forms of entertainment and leisure activities, such as cable and satellite television, motion pictures and videogames in physical and digital formats.

A significant portion of our music publishing revenues is subject to rate regulation either by government entities or by local third-party collection societies throughout the world and rates on other income streams may be set by governmental proceedings, which may limit our profitability. Mechanical royalties and performance royalties are the two largest sources of income to our music publishing business and mechanical royalties are a significant expense to our recorded music business. In the United States, mechanical royalty rates are set pursuant to an administrative rate-setting process under the U.S. Copyright Act, unless rates are determined through voluntary industry negotiations, and performance royalty rates are set by performing rights societies and subject to challenge by performing rights licensees. Mechanical royalties are paid at a rate of 9.1 cents per song per unit in the United States for physical formats (e.g., CDs and vinyl albums) and permanent digital downloads (recordings in excess of five minutes attract a higher rate) and approximately $0.06 per 100 on-demand streams. Outside the United States, mechanical and performance royalty rates are typically negotiated on an industry-wide basis. In most territories outside the United States, mechanical royalties are based on a percentage of wholesale prices for physical product and based on a percentage of consumer prices for digital products. The mechanical and performance royalty rates set pursuant to such processes may adversely affect us by limiting our ability to increase the profitability of our music publishing business. If the mechanical royalty rates are set too high it may also adversely affect us by limiting our ability to increase the profitability of our recorded music business. In addition, rates our recorded music business receives in the United States for, among other sources of income and potential income, webcasting and satellite radio are set by an administrative process under the U.S. Copyright Act unless rates are determined through voluntary industry negotiations. Any reduction in the rates would adversely affect our recorded music business. It is important as sales shift from physical to diversified distribution channels that we receive fair value for all of the uses of our intellectual property as our business model now depends upon multiple revenue streams from multiple sources. If the rates for recorded music income sources that are established through legally prescribed rate-setting processes are set too low, it could have a material adverse impact on our recorded music business or our business prospects.

We face a potential loss of titles to the extent that our recording artists have a right to recapture rights in their recordings under the U.S. Copyright Act. The U.S. Copyright Act provides authors (or their heirs) a right to terminate U.S. licenses or assignments of rights in their copyrighted works in certain circumstances. This right does not apply to works that are “works made for hire.” Since the effective date of U.S. federal copyright protection for sound recordings (February 15, 1972), virtually all of our agreements with recording artists provide that such recording artists render services under a work-made-for-hire relationship. A termination right exists under the U.S. Copyright Act for U.S. rights in musical compositions that are not “works made for hire.” If any of our commercially available sound recordings were determined not to be “works made for hire,” then the recording artists (or their heirs) could have the right to terminate the U.S. federal copyright rights they granted to us, generally during a five-year period starting at the end of 35 years from the date of release of a recording under a post-1977 license or assignment (or, in the case of a pre-1978 grant in a pre-1978 recording, generally during a five-year period starting at the end of 56 years from the date of copyright). A termination of U.S. federal copyright rights could have an adverse effect on our business. From time to time, authors (or their heirs) have the opportunity to terminate our U.S. rights in musical compositions.

Risks Related to Our Stock and Reporting Requirements

Our Common Stock No Longer Trades On the OTC Bulletin Board But Only On the OTC Expert Market, Making It Very Difficult to Buy or Sell Our Stock. In November, 2021, FINRA ceased operations of the OTC Bulletin Board, the market on which our stock had been trading. Due to our failure to timely file this Form 10-K and remaining ongoing delinquent filings of our Form 10-Qs, shares of our Common Stock now trade on the OTC Expert Market. Companies on the Expert Market provide the lowest level of disclosure in comparison to other OTC Market tiers. Quotes of securities in the Expert Market are “Unsolicited Only,” which means that trades of securities subject to unsolicited quotation in the Expert Market are only available to broker-dealers, institutions and other sophisticated investors, and not average investors.   

As a result, it can be difficult to buy or sell our shares. To become listed on the OTCQB, we will have to comply with the OTC Market’s eligibility requirements, which include the following:

There is no assurance that the Company will become or remain current on its Exchange Act reports or meet the other eligibility requirements to become listed on the OTCQB or another market. If the Company does not become listed on the OTCQB or other market, holders of our Common Stock may have difficulty on a long term basis in selling their shares.

The Company May No Longer Be a Public Company If It Does Not File Its Delinquent Exchange Act Reports Soon. The SEC may request at any time that the Company de-register as a public company no longer subject to public reporting requirements, which will make it difficult to raise capital and impossible to trade its common stock.

At any time before the delinquent Form 10-Qs are filed, the SEC may request that the Company de-register as a public company. If the Company fails to be permitted to file its delinquent reports after this notice it will be required to de-register its shares with the SEC, thus losing its public company status. If the Company is no longer public, it will no longer have any market for the trading of its common stock and capital raises will be more difficult, heightening the risk of its failure to meet its debt obligations and ultimately its insolvency.

The Company Has Raised Over $10 Million, Portions of Which May Have Been Raised Without Relying On A Current Private Placement Memorandum and There Is No Assurance It Properly Qualified for Exemption Under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, Also Known as the Private Placement Exemption. Portions of the Company’s capital raising activities have been conducted without reliance on a current Private Placement Memorandum or current Subscription Agreement. While the Company believes that these capital raising activities have met the requirements of the private placement exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, there can be no assurance that is the case. Additionally, the Company may not have timely filed any Form Ds required by a state agency. Investors who purchased our stock without receiving a current Private Placement Memorandum may allege that they did not receive proper disclosure regarding our business and the risks of investing in our stock, and as such may attempt to rescind their investment.

There Is a Limited Trading Market for Our Common Stock. Although our stock is publicly traded, the trading market is limited. As a result, any broker/dealer that makes a market in our stock or other person that buys or sells our stock could have a significant influence over its price at any given time. We cannot assure our stockholders that a market for our stock will be sustained.

Our Reporting Obligations As a Public Company are Costly. Operating a public company involves substantial costs to comply with reporting obligations under federal securities laws which are continuing to increase as provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley-Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) are implemented. We may not reach sufficient size to justify our public reporting status. If we were forced to become a private company, then our stockholders may lose their ability to sell their shares and there would be substantial costs associated with becoming a private company.

Our Reduced Stock Price May Adversely Affect Our Liquidity.  Our common stock has been trading at less than $1.00 per share since inception of the Company.  Many market makers are reluctant to make a market in stock with a trading price of less than $1.00 per share.  To the extent that we have fewer market makers for our common stock, our volume and liquidity will likely decline, which could further depress our stock price.

The Requirements of Being a Public Company May Strain Our Resources, Divert Management’s Attention, and Affect Our Ability to Attract and Retain Qualified Board Members. As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protections Act, the listing requirements of any exchange or other market listing our stock, and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations increases our legal and financial compliance costs, makes some activities more difficult, time-consuming, or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and operating results. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could harm our business and operating results. We may need to hire more employees in the future to meet these requirements, which will increase our costs and expenses.

In addition, changing laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations, and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

The Company operates out of its office located at 1206 East Warner Road, Suite 101-I, Gilbert, Arizona, 85296. The Company has a short-term lease with a related party for this office space through September 30, 2022, at the rate of $825 per month.

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company executed a Promissory Note payable to Rachelle Strole, dated July 6, 2021, in an original principal amount of $400,000 and with a maturity of July 31, 2021 (the “Note”). The Note was not paid as of the maturity date and as a result went into default. Ms. Stole filed a Complaint in Case No. CV2021-014423 in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona against the Company for damages related to its failure to pay the amounts owed under the Note. A default judgment was entered in favor of Ms. Strole on December 17, 2021. Thus far, Ms. Strole has not enforced the judgment. The Company and Ms. Strole have entered into settlement negotiations but as the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, the parties have not yet agreed to a settlement and as a result the matter remains unresolved.

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

The Company’s common stock was traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, but is now traded on the OTC Expert Market under the symbol “RIVU.” As of April 30, 2022, there were 144,045,171 shares outstanding. Any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer priced, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Holders

As of April 30, 2022, there were approximately 522 holders of record of the Company’s common stock. The number of common stockholders was determined from the records of our stock transfer agent and does not reflect persons or entities that hold their shares in nominee or “street” name through various brokerage firms. All shares held by officers and directors of the Company are restricted shares subject to Rule 144 and may not be sold and/or transferred without further registration under the Act or pursuant to an applicable exemption. The Company has no agreement in place to register any of its shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dividends

No dividends have been declared on the Company’s stock, nor does the Company foresee any dividends being declared in the near future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

On May 26, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (“2020 Incentive Plan”). The 2020 Incentive Plan allows the Board of Directors to grant up to 16,000,000 shares of common stock to directors, officers, employees and consultants in a combination of equity incentive forms including incentive stock options (ISO), non-qualified stock options (NQSO), stock appreciation right (SAR) or restricted shares (RSU) of common stock, provided that, no more than 10,000,000 shares of common stock may be granted as ISOs.

Options granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan have a 10-year maximum term, an exercise price equal to at least the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant, and with varying vesting periods as determined by the Board.

As of July 31, 2021, stock options for 9,000,000 shares of common stock had been granted. As of July 31, 2021 the following options had been granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan.

Performance Graph

As a smaller reporting company, the Company is not required to provide a performance graph.

Sales of Unregistered Securities

All sales of unregistered securities during FY 2021 have previously been disclosed on the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a smaller reporting company, the Company is not required to provide Item 6 disclosure in this Annual Report.

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The Company is engaged in the production, distribution and marketing of feature-length films, television series and mini-series, and television movies, from initial creative development through principal photography, postproduction, distribution, and ancillary sales, as well as the music production and distribution industry. The Company also provides event-based audio and video design, production, and installation services.

The Company’s activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the need for additional capital, as described below at “Going Concern.” The Company does not currently have positive cash flows from operations and is dependent on periodic infusions of capital to fund its operating requirements.

At July 31, 2021, the Company had completed two feature films and one documentary and had one feature film in production. The documentary is about the life of former Arizona Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and is entitled “It’s Complicated”. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, this film has not been sold or distributed.

The feature film productions that were completed at July 31, 2021 are entitled “Please Baby Please” and “Mistress.” Current discussion are underway to distribute and sell Please Baby Please after it was featured at the Amsterdam Film Festival. The Company had a screening on April 12, 2022, of Mistress with 46 potential buyers invited for distribution of the film. Discussions are currently underway for the distribution and sale of the movie.

In June 2021, the Company commenced the filming of its third feature film production, “Taurus”, which was completed in December 2021. Although the agreement has not been executed, the Company has reached an agreement in principal with AMC Plus to distribute this film in North America for a minimum guarantee of $1.6 million plus royalties and is in discussions to distribute the film to foreign markets through Island Film Group. There is no assurance this agreement will be executed, but management is optimistic.

The Company also began production of a children’s television series called “Storyland.” Pre-production activities on this series are underway.

At July 31, 2021, and 2020, project development costs aggregated $4,915,610 and $134,413, respectively. The Company expects to receive revenues from both domestic and foreign distribution from its productions during the fiscal year ending July 31, 2022, and thereafter, but there is no assurance this will occur.

Going Concern

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations and negative operating cash flows since inception. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company incurred a net loss of $1,851,108. The Company financed its working capital requirements during this period primarily through the sale of its equity securities and the issuance of short term notes.

At July 31, 2021, the Company had limited cash resources available to fund its operations and will therefore need to raise additional funds in the short-term. The Company estimates that a significant amount of capital will be necessary over a sustained period of time to advance the development of the Company’s business activities to the point at which it can become commercially viable and self-sustaining. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in this regard.

As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, also expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional funds and successfully implement its business plan, and to ultimately achieve sustainable operating revenues and profitability. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

The development and expansion of the Company’s business is dependent on many factors, including the capital resources available to the Company. No assurances can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that they will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or adequate to fund the development and expansion of the Company’s business operations to a level that is commercially viable and self-sustaining. There is also significant uncertainty as to the effect that the coronavirus pandemic may have on the availability, amount, and type of financing in the future.

If cash resources are insufficient to satisfy the Company’s ongoing cash requirements, the Company may be required to scale back its operations, liquidate its media assets to obtain funds, enter into strategic alliances that may require the Company to relinquish rights to any media assets, or discontinue its operations entirely.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 significantly changes how entities measure credit losses for most financial assets, including accounts and notes receivable. ASU 2016-13 will replace the current “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model, under which companies will recognize allowances based on expected rather than incurred losses. Entities will apply the provisions of ASU 2016-13 as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which ASU 2016-13 is effective. ASU 2016-13 will be effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2022. Management has not yet evaluated the effect that the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures. 

In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-02, Entertainment—Films—Other Assets—Film Costs (Subtopic 926-20) and Entertainment—Broadcasters—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Subtopic 920-350): Improvements to Accounting for Costs of Films and License Agreements for Program Materials (“ASU 2019-02”). ASU 2019-02 aligns the accounting for production costs of an episodic television series with the accounting for production costs of films by removing the content distinction for capitalization. Accordingly, the capitalization of production costs for episodic television series is no longer constrained until persuasive evidence of secondary market revenues exists. This new guidance also updates certain presentation and disclosure requirements for capitalized film and television costs and requires impairment testing to be performed at a group level for capitalized film and television costs when the content is predominantly monetized with other owned or licensed content. A film group is defined as the lowest level at which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other films and/or license agreements. In addition, under previous guidance, film and television programs accounted for under the broadcasting accounting standard were carried on the balance sheet at the lower of cost or net realizable value. This new guidance requires that an entity test a film or television program for impairment, when impairment indicators are present, at a film group level when the film or license agreement is predominantly monetized with other films and/or license agreements. The impairment would be measured as the difference between the carrying value of the film group and its fair value rather than its net realizable value. This new guidance requires that an entity provide new disclosures about content that is either produced or licensed and classify cash flows for licensed content as cash flows from operating activities in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2019-02 was effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning August 1, 2020 and was required to be adopted on a prospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2019-02 did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures. The Company will continue to present all project development costs, including capitalized costs of acquired programming rights, as non-current assets in its consolidated balance sheet. 

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”). ASU 2019-12 simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions and enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance in ASC 740. ASU 2019-12 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Management has not yet evaluated the effect that the adoption of ASU 2019-12 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures. 

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt — Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for convertible debt by eliminating the beneficial conversion and cash conversion accounting models. Upon adoption of ASU 2020-06, convertible debt proceeds, unless issued with a substantial premium or an embedded conversion feature that is not clearly and closely related to the host contract, will no longer be allocated between debt and equity components. ASU 2020-06 will reduce the issue discount and result in less non-cash interest expense in financial statements. ASU 2020-06 also revises the earnings per share calculation and requires entities to assume share settlement when the convertible debt can be settled in cash or shares. For contracts in an entity’s own equity, the type of contracts primarily affected by ASU 2020-06 are freestanding and embedded features that are accounted for as derivatives under the current guidance due to a failure to meet the settlement conditions of the derivative scope exception. ASU 2020-06 simplifies the related settlement assessment by removing the requirements to (i) consider whether the contract would be settled in registered shares, (ii) consider whether collateral is required to be posted, and (iii) assess shareholder rights. ASU 2020-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and only if adopted as of the beginning of such fiscal year. Management has not yet evaluated the effect that the adoption of ASU 2020-06 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures. 

In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt — Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options (“ASU 2021-04”). ASU 2021-04 provides guidance as to how an issuer should account for a modification of the terms or conditions or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option (i.e., a warrant) that remains classified after modification or exchange as an exchange of the original instrument for a new instrument. An issuer should measure the effect of a modification or exchange as the difference between the fair value of the modified or exchanged warrant and the fair value of that warrant immediately before modification or exchange and then apply a recognition model that comprises four categories of transactions and the corresponding accounting treatment for each category (equity issuance, debt origination, debt modification, and modifications unrelated to equity issuance and debt origination or modification). ASU 2021-04 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity should apply the guidance provided in ASU 2021-04 prospectively to modifications or exchanges occurring on or after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity elects to early adopt ASU 2021-04 in an interim period, the guidance should be applied as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. Management has not yet evaluated the effect that the adoption of ASU 2021-04 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures. 

Concentration of Risk

The Company may periodically contract with consultants and vendors to provide services related to the Company’s business activities. Agreements for these services may be for a specific time period or for a specific project or task.

Costs and expenses incurred that represented 10% or more of costs for the period from August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021, consist of legal fees of $224,389 incurred with the Company’s corporate and securities law firm.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations presented below is based on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, and for the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Certain accounting policies and estimates are particularly important to the understanding of the Company’s financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by management or can be materially affected by changes from period to period in economic factors or conditions that are outside of the Company’s control. As a result, these issues are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, management uses its judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on the Company’s historical operations, the future business plans and the projected financial results, the terms of existing contracts, trends in the industry, and information available from other outside sources. For a more complete description of the Company’s significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Film, Television Programs, and Music Production Costs 

Film, television program, and music production costs are capitalized in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 926, Entertainment - Films. Capitalized amounts are stated at the lower of cost, less accumulated amortization, or fair value. These costs represent capitalized costs for the production of films and other entertainment projects. In addition to the films, television programs and music that the Company may produce, costs of productions in development are capitalized as development costs and are transferred to production costs when the project is set for production. Films, television programs and music in development include costs of acquiring film rights to books, stage plays or original screenplays and costs to adapt such projects, as well as amounts paid to musical artists. Projects in development are written off if they are determined not to be recoverable and are evaluated for impairment at each reporting period.

Once a project is released to consumers, the capitalized costs are amortized on an individual project basis in the proportion that the current revenue for each project bears to the estimated remaining unrecognized revenue to be received from all sources for each project as of the beginning of the current fiscal year. Revenue and cost forecasts are periodically reviewed by management and revised when warranted.

The carrying value of film costs are reviewed for impairment each reporting period on a project-by-project basis. If events or changes in circumstance indicate that the fair value of the capitalized costs on a specific project is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the unamortized costs exceed the project’s fair value.

As of July 31, 2021, the Company completed two feature films and one documentary and has one feature film in production. After testing for impairment of each of the projects, management has determined that no impairment charges should be recognized. 

Revenue Recognition

Film and Television Program Revenues

The Company’s film and television program business is expected to generate revenues principally from the licensing of content in domestic theatrical exhibition, home entertainment (e.g., digital media and packaged media), television, and international marketplaces.

Revenue will be recognized upon transfer of control of promised services or goods to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to receive in exchange for those services or goods. Revenues do not include taxes collected from customers on behalf of taxing authorities, such as sales tax and value-added tax.

Revenues from the licensing of film and television content and the sales and licensing of music will be recognized when the content has been delivered and the license period has begun, as discussed above. Revenues from the licensing of symbolic intellectual property (i.e., licenses of motion pictures or television characters, brands, storylines, themes, or logos) will be recognized over the corresponding license term. Commissions will be recognized as such services are provided.

The Company’s content licensing arrangements are expected to include fixed fee and minimum guarantee arrangements, and sales or usage-based royalties.

Fixed Fee or Minimum Guarantees. 

The Company’s fixed fee or minimum guarantee licensing arrangements may, in some cases, include multiple titles, multiple license periods (windows) with a substantive period in between the windows, rights to exploitation in different media, or rights to exploitation in multiple territories, which may be considered distinct performance obligations. When these performance obligations are considered distinct, the fixed fee or minimum guarantee in the arrangement is allocated to the title, window, media right or territory as applicable, based on estimates of relative standalone selling prices. The amounts related to each performance obligation (i.e., title, window, media, or territory) will be recognized when the content has been delivered, and the window for the exploitation right in that territory has begun, which is the point in time at which the customer is able to begin to use and benefit from the content. 

Sales or Usage Based Royalties. 

Sales or usage-based royalties will represent amounts due to the Company based on the “sale” or “usage” of the Company’s content by the customer, and revenues which will be recognized at the later of when the subsequent sale or usage occurs, or the performance obligation to which some or all the sales or usage-based royalty has been allocated and has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). Generally, when the Company licenses completed content (with standalone functionality, such as a movie, or television show), its performance obligation will be satisfied prior to the sale or usage. When the Company licenses intellectual property that does not have stand-alone functionality (e.g., brands, themes, logos, etc.), its performance obligation will generally be satisfied in the same period as the sale or usage. The actual amounts due to the Company under these arrangements will generally not be reported to the Company until after the close of the reporting period. The Company will record revenue under these arrangements for the amounts due and not yet reported to the Company based on estimates of the sales or usage of these customers and pursuant to the terms of the contracts. Such estimates will be based on information from the Company’s customers, historical experience with similar titles in that market or territory, the performance of the title in other markets, and/or data available in the industry. 

Revenues by Market or Product Line.

The following describes the revenues expected to be generated by market or product line.

Theatrical. Theatrical revenues are derived from the domestic theatrical release of motion pictures licensed to theatrical exhibitors on a picture-by-picture basis. Revenue from the theatrical release of feature films are treated as sales or usage- based royalties, are recognized as revenue starting at the exhibition date and are based on the Company’s participation in box office receipts of the theatrical exhibitor.

Home Entertainment. Home entertainment consists of Digital Media and Packaged Media.

Digital Media. Digital media will include digital transaction revenue sharing arrangements (pay-per-view and video-on-demand platforms, electronic sell through (“EST”), and digital rental) and licenses of content to digital platforms for a fixed fee.

Digital Transaction Revenue Sharing Arrangements: Represents primarily revenue sharing arrangements with certain digital media platforms which generally provide that, in exchange for a nominal or no upfront sales price. The Company shares in the rental or sales revenues generated by the platform on a title-by-title basis. These digital media platforms generate revenue from rental and EST arrangements, such as download-to-own, download-to-rent, and video-on-demand. These revenue sharing arrangements are recognized as sales or usage-based royalties based on the performance of these platforms and pursuant to the terms of the contract, as discussed above. The Company has not entered into any of these arrangements as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K.

Licenses of Content to Digital Platforms: Represents primarily the licensing of content to subscription-video-on-demand (“SVOD”) or other digital platforms for a fixed fee. As discussed above, revenues are recognized when the content has been delivered and the window for the exploitation right in that territory has begun. The Company has not entered into any of these arrangements as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K 

Packaged Media: Packaged media revenues will represent the sale of motion pictures and television shows (produced or acquired) on physical discs (DVD’s, Blu-ray, 4K Ultra HD, referred to as “Packaged Media”) in the retail market. Revenues are recognized, net of an allowance for estimated returns and other allowances, on the later of receipt by the customer or “street date” (when it is available for sale by the customer).

Television: Television revenues will be derived from the licensing to domestic markets (linear pay, basic cable, free television markets, syndication) of motion pictures (including theatrical productions and acquired films) and scripted and unscripted television series, television movies, mini-series, and non-fiction programming. Television revenues will include fixed fee arrangements, as well as arrangements in which the Company will earn advertising revenue from the exploitation of certain content on television networks. Television will also include revenue from licenses to SVOD platforms in which the initial license of a television series is to an SVOD platform. Revenues associated with a title, right, or window from television licensing arrangements will be recognized when the feature film or television program is delivered (on an episodic basis for television product) and the window for the exploitation right has begun

International: International revenues will be derived from (1) licensing of the Company’s productions, acquired films, catalog product and libraries of acquired titles to international distributors, on a territory-by-territory basis; (2) the direct distribution of the Company’s productions, acquired films, and the Company’s catalog product and libraries of acquired titles; and (3) licensing to international markets of scripted and unscripted series, television movies, mini-series and non-fiction programming. License fees and minimum guarantee amounts associated with title, window, media, or territory, will be recognized when access to the feature film or television program has been granted or delivery has occurred, as required under the contract, and the right to exploit the feature film or television program in that window, media or territory has commenced. Revenues will also be generated from sales or usage-based royalties received from international distributors based on their distribution performance pursuant to the terms of the contracts after the recoupment of certain costs in some cases, and the initial minimum guarantee, if any, and are recognized when the sale by the Company’s customer generating a royalty due to the Company has occurred.  

Event-Based: Event-based revenues are derived from providing audio and video design, production and installation services and are recognized when the terms and conditions of such services have been formally agreed to and documented, the services have been provided, the amount to be billed is determinable, and the amount billed is reasonably collectible.  

Other: Other revenues will be derived from the licensing of the Company’s film and television and related content (games, music, location-based entertainment royalties, etc.) to other ancillary markets and from commissions earned and executive producer fees related to talent management.  

Related Parties: Revenues from related parties are expected to reflect pricing comparable to arm’s-length customers.

Deferred Revenue

Deferred revenue relates to customer cash advances or deposits received prior to when the Company satisfies the corresponding performance obligation.

Payment terms are expected to vary by location and type of customer and the nature of the licensing arrangement, however, other than multi-year license arrangements; payments will generally be due within 60 days after revenue is recognized. For certain multi-year licensing arrangements, primarily in the television, digital media, and international markets, payments may be due over a longer period. When the Company expects the period between fulfillment of the Company’s performance obligation and the receipt of payment to be greater than a year, a significant financing component will be present. In these cases, such payments will be discounted to present value based on a discount rate reflective of a separate financing transaction between the customer and the Company, at contract inception. The significant financing component will be recorded as a reduction to revenue and accounts receivable initially, with such accounts receivable discount amortized to interest income over the period to receipt of payment. The Company does not assess contracts with deferred payments for significant financing components if, at contract inception, the Company expects the period between fulfillment of the performance obligation and subsequent payment to be one year or less.

In other cases, customer payments may be made in advance of when the Company fulfills its performance obligation and recognizes revenue. This may primarily occur under television production contracts, in which payments may be received as the production progresses, international motion picture contracts, where a portion of the payments are received prior to the completion of the movie and prior to license rights start dates and pay television contracts with multiple windows with a portion of the revenues deferred until the subsequent exploitation windows commence. These arrangements will not contain significant financing components because the reason for the payment structure is not for the provision of financing to the Company, but rather to mitigate the Company’s risk of customer non-performance and incentivize the customer to exploit the Company’s content.

Results of Operations

At July 31, 2021, the Company had commenced business operations, but did not have positive cash flows from operations and will be dependent on periodic infusions of capital to fund its operating requirements.

Operating Expenses

The Company generally recognizes operating costs and expenses as they are incurred in two general categories, sales and marketing costs and expenses and general and administrative costs and expenses. The Company’s operating costs and expenses also include non-cash components related to depreciation and amortization of property and equipment which are allocated, as appropriate, to sales and marketing costs and expenses and general and administrative costs and expenses.

Sales and marketing costs and expenses consist primarily of press releases, web design and photo shoots and related one-time use equipment.

General and administrative costs and expenses consist of stock-based compensation, payroll to officers and employees, accounting fees, audit fees, legal fees, transfer agent fees, insurance, investor relations and other general corporate expenses. Management expects general and administrative costs and expenses to increase in future periods as the Company adds personnel and incurs additional costs related to its operation, including higher legal, accounting, insurance, compliance, compensation, and other costs.

The Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discussed herein are presented below.

Year Ended July 31, 2021 and the Period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020

Revenues. The Company generated revenues of $64,074, including $16,000 from a related party, during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, related to an event-based video production. The Company had no revenues from February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020.

General and Administrative:

Officers, Directors, Affiliates and Other Related Parties.

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, general and administrative costs associated with officers, directors, affiliates, and other related parties were $1,032,164, which consisted of stock-based compensation of $88,956, compensation to officers of $865,000, and an area standards agreement incurred with the Company’s IATSE union liaison of $78,208.

For the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020, general and administrative costs associated with officers, directors, affiliates, and other related parties were $493,472, which consisted of stock-based compensation of $183,472, and compensation to officers of $310,000.

Other General and Administrative Expenses.

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, other general and administrative costs were $1,210,387, which consisted of compensation and related costs of $455,556, health insurance of $70,348, accounting fees of $98,866, review and audit fees of $146,914, tax preparation fees of $11,723, legal fees of $247,234, office rent of $58,213, transfer agent fees of $11,305, depreciation of $2,615, and other operating costs of $107,613.

For the period from February 11, 2020 (inception) through July 31, 2020, general and administrative cost and expenses were $941,319, which consisted of stock-based compensation of $183,472, payroll to officers of $310,000, other payroll and related costs of $80,984, accounting fees of $40,711, audit fees of $25,295, legal fees of $268,124, transfer agent fees of $20,458 and other operating costs of $12,275.

Event Based Production Costs. Event based production costs are costs incurred in the production of media content for third parties through Eventide Media. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, event-based production costs were $35,349, which consisted of equipment rental of $13,124, labor of $12,372, and other general and administrative expenses of $9,853. The Company did not have any event-based production costs for the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020. All film production costs are capitalized and the bulk of the capital raised, or approximately $4,781,197, was used for these costs in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021.

Sales and Marketing. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, sales and marketing costs were $13,926, which consisted of press release costs of $7,475, branding guidance and advertising of $5,486, and other sales and marketing costs of $965. For the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020, sales and marketing costs were $11,289, which consisted of press release costs of $7,100, domain fees and web design costs of $912, and photo shoots and equipment costs of $3,277.

Write-off of Consideration Paid for Acquisition of Maughan Music Group, LLC. For the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020, the Company wrote-off its investment in Maughan Music Group, LLC totaling $115,532 which consisted of the fair value of 925,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that were issued in connection with the investment.

Increase in Fair Value of Marketable Securities. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company recorded an increase in the fair value of its investment in marketable securities of $523,315. For the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020, the Company recorded an increase in the fair value of its investment in marketable securities of $1,639.

Convertible Promissory Note Payable Default Obligation Incurred. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company recognized a charge to operations of $64,375 representing the potential loss related to the default on a convertible promissory note.

Interest Expense. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company had interest expense of $34,163 (including interest on short term and convertible notes of $47,955), reversal of $17,146 of interest expense which was related to the write-off of debt discount on convertible promissory note payable and short-term unsecured debt. The Company capitalized $78,751 of interest expense related to the secured multiple advance promissory note as such costs related to production costs of a feature film in process. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020, the Company had interest expense of $427.

Net Loss. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company incurred a net loss of $1,851,108, as compared to a net loss of $1,066,928 for the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020. The increase of net loss was primarily a result of higher expenses primarily due to the comparison with a shorter period ended July 31, 2020 as compared to the one-year period ended July 31, 2021.

Liquidity and Capital Resources – July 31, 2021

The Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows as discussed herein are presented below.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations and negative operating cash flows since inception. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company incurred a net loss of $1,851,108. The Company financed its working capital requirements during this period primarily through the sale of its equity securities and the issuance of short term notes. Accordingly, management has concluded that these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, has expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern (see “Going Concern” above).

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional funds and implement its business plan, and to ultimately achieve sustainable operating revenues and profitability. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

At July 31, 2021, the Company had a cash balance of $32,473 and a working capital deficiency of $3,497,658. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company generated cash of $3,265,000 from the sale of 39,250,000 shares of common stock, $67,400 from the collection of common stock subscriptions receivable from both related and unrelated parties for 1,348,000 shares of common stock which had been subscribed for in August and September 2020, $60,000 from a common stock subscription that was subsequently rescinded, $3,479,571 in proceeds from the issuance of various notes payable, offset by the principal repayment of $578,638 in notes payable. At July 31, 2021, the Company had $4,338,101 in current liabilities, with respect to which it will either need to repay or extend the due date. Almost $5 million of capital raised was used for project costs to produce the films.

At July 31, 2021, the Company had limited cash resources available to fund its operations and repay its short-term indebtedness, and will therefore need to raise additional funds to repay debt and finance its short-term working capital requirements. The Company estimates that a significant amount of capital will be necessary over a sustained period of time to advance the development of the Company’s business activities to the point at which it can become commercially viable and self-sustaining. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in this regard. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, the Company has total debt of $5,719,219 and deferred salaries totaling $775,325.

Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc.

On February 8, 2022, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc, (“Geneva Roth”) to settle and resolve the Company’s obligations with respect to three Convertible Promissory Notes executed by the Company and payable to Geneva Roth dated July 8, 2021, August 2, 2021, and September 7, 2021, respectively (the “Notes”). The Company was in default under these Notes.

Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company would pay an aggregate amount of $386,533 to Geneva Roth, which would constitute payment in full under the Notes. Payments were to be made in weekly installments, with the first 12 payments in the amount of $30,000 each and a final payment in the amount of $26,533. The first payment was paid on February 11, 2022, and the Company paid $270,000 towards the outstanding balance as of April 24, 2022. On April 19, 2022, the Company and Geneva Roth amended the Settlement Agreement to provide that Geneva Roth would accept $80,000 as full payment of the remaining amount due under the Settlement Agreement. On April 25, 2022, the Company made a one-time payment of $50,000, and on April 27, 2022, the Company and Geneva Roth entered into a Mutual Release and Agreement, whereby the parties agreed that this $50,000 payment constituted full satisfaction of the Notes.

Operating Activities

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, operating activities utilized cash of $1,320,626, as compared to utilizing cash of $462,878 for the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020, to fund the Company’s ongoing operating expenses.

Investing Activities

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company’s investing activities utilized cash of $4,958,515 consisting of $33,661 for the purchase of property and equipment, $143,657 for the purchase of intellectual property, and $4,781,197 for the payment of project development costs. For the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020, the Company’s investing activities utilized cash of $134,413 for the payment of project development costs. The increase in investing activities is a result of the Company expansion of its production efforts.

Financing Activities

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Company’s financing activities provided net cash of $6,293,333, consisting of proceeds of $3,265,000 from the sale of 39,250,000 shares of common stock, $67,400 received from common stock subscriptions receivable for 1,348,000 shares of common stock, proceeds from a rescinded stock subscription receivable of $60,000, proceeds of $225,000 from the issuance of a convertible promissory note payable, $1,000,000 from the issuance of a secured Multiple Advance Promissory Note, proceeds of $185,000 in unsecured promissory notes, reduced by repayments of $10,000, and proceeds of $2,069,571 in unsecured promissory notes from related parties, reduced by repayments of $568,638.

For the period February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through July 31, 2020, the Company’s financing activities generated cash of $615,572 consisting of $590,000 from the sale of 13,823,800 shares of common stock, proceeds of $25,000 from the issuance of a convertible promissory note payable, and cash of $572 acquired in connection with the reverse merger transaction.

Project Funding

The Company expects that its film projects will be funded through a variety of techniques. The films that the Company intends to produce will likely include a well-known cast and a compelling script. The Company plans to use sales agents to pre-sell foreign distribution rights, which would include money guarantees from the distributors. In addition, the Company’s sales agents will attempt to secure domestic right pre-sales through backstop (floor amount) agreements or direct distribution agreements with money guarantees. The Company will continue to give strong consideration to produce films in states that provide significant tax incentive rebates. 

The Company’s objective is for these agreements, together with the tax incentives, to provide security for bank financing at 80% to 90% of the aggregate contract and tax incentive amounts, as well as that bank loans, pre-sale agreements and tax incentive assignments will provide sufficient funds to finance the respective project costs. So far this form of financing has not been obtained and the Company has instead relied on temporary financing which has resulted in ongoing renegotiations of due dates as a result of timing differences between obtaining the funds and the time frame needed to complete the projects. While the Company has planned to use this temporary funding from film project lenders until the Company is able to obtain project financing from senior lenders, it instead has been forced to rely on short term financing payment deferrals with some limited repayments of term loans.

Principal Commitments

Employment Agreements

The Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries have entered into employment agreements with their officers with total aggregate monthly salaries of $75,000. As of July 31, 2021, Mr., Klusman has deferred $484,670 of his salary.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements at July 31, 2021, or 2020.

Impact of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) on the Company’s Business Operations

The global outbreak of COVID-19 and its variants has led to severe disruptions in general economic activities, as businesses and governments have taken broad actions to mitigate this public health crisis. Although the Company has not experienced any significant disruption to its business to date, these conditions could significantly negatively impact the Company’s business in the future.

The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak and its variants ultimately impacts the Company’s business, future revenues, results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak, the emergence of additional variants, its severity and longevity, the actions to curtail the virus and treat its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. Although the COVID-19 outbreak appears to be subsiding, the Company may be at risk of experiencing a significant impact to its business as a result of the global economic impact, including any economic downturn or recession that has occurred or may occur in the future if there is a significant resurgence of COVID-19 cases.

There is also significant uncertainty as to the effect that the coronavirus may have on the amount and type of financing available to the Company in the future.

The Company intends to continue to monitor the situation and may adjust its current business plans as more information and guidance become available.

Trends, Events and Uncertainties

The production, distribution and marketing of feature-length films, television series and mini-series, and television movies, from initial creative development through principal photography, postproduction, distribution and ancillary sales, is, by its nature, unpredictable and costly, and occurs over an extended period of time. Although the Company will undertake program development efforts with commercially reasonable diligence, there can be no assurance that the Company’s efforts to raise funds in the future will be sufficient to enable the Company to develop its program content to the extent needed to create future revenues to sustain operations as contemplated herein.

There can be no assurances that the Company will ever achieve sustainable revenues sufficient to support its operations. Even if the Company is able to generate revenues, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve profitability or positive operating cash flows. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to secure additional financing on acceptable terms or at all. If cash resources are insufficient to satisfy the Company’s ongoing cash requirements, the Company would be required to scale back or discontinue its operations, or obtain funds, if available (although there can be no certainty), through strategic alliances that may require the Company to relinquish rights to certain of its programs, or to curtail or discontinue its operations entirely.

Other than as discussed above and elsewhere in the financial statements, the Company is not currently aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that are likely to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition in the near term, although it is possible that new trends or events may develop in the future that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition. 

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company, the Company is not required to provide Item 7A disclosure in this Annual Report.

ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Information required by this Item 8 is incorporated by reference to our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm beginning at page F-1 of this report

ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no disagreements or reportable events with Farber Hass Hurley LLP.

ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013).

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to ensure that material information regarding the Company’s operations is made available to management and the board of directors to provide them reasonable assurance that the published financial statements are fairly presented.

The Company is required to establish and maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, consisting of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As required by Rule 15d-15(b) of the SEC, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, consisting of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of July 31, 2021, the end of the most recent period covered by this report.

Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of July 31, 2021, due to the identification of significant deficiencies and the existence of the material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as described below, the Company concluded that the design and operation its disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, consisting of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance concerning both the reliability of its financial reporting and the preparation of its financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and SEC reporting standards. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that obligate the Company to maintain reasonably detailed records that accurately and fairly reflect the Company’s business transactions, provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s business transactions are properly and timely recorded, ensure that the Company’s receipts and disbursements are authorized by management, if applicable, by the Company’s board of directors, that revenues are properly and timely recorded, and that assets are properly identified, recorded and periodically evaluated for impairment.

Based on the Company’s assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of July 31 2021, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP and SEC reporting standards, for the reasons noted below.

Current executive management has not yet retained the financial and accounting staff necessary to conform to the checks and balances needed for proper internal controls, as well as with the technical competence and accounting experience to address accounting and reporting issues under US GAAP and SEC reporting standards. Current management has retained the services of qualified outside consultants with expertise to perform specific accounting and finance functions, and to assist in the design of accounting and internal control systems. Accordingly, the Company has not yet completed the process to establish adequate internal controls over financial reporting, and it expects that this process will take some time to accomplish and will require the availability of additional operating capital. However, there can be no assurances that these efforts will be sufficient to fully develop and implement adequate disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting.

The Company’s management, consisting of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and any instances of malfeasance or fraud have been detected.

Management believes that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the period ended July 31, 2021.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management, consisting of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has determined that no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during or subsequent to the period ended July 31, 2021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, other than the material weaknesses as noted above.

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 9C – DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS 

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Membership and Board Committees

The directors serving the Company are as follows:

The Company’s directors, as named above, will serve until the next annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and have qualified. Directors will be elected for one-year terms at the annual stockholders meeting. There is no arrangement or understanding between any of the directors or officers of the Company and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or officer, and there is no arrangement, plan or understanding as to whether non-management stockholders will exercise their voting rights to continue to elect the current directors to the Company’s board. There are also no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management stockholders that may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of the Company’s affairs.

There are no agreements with respect to electing directors. The Board of Directors appoints officers annually and each executive officer serves at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company does not have any standing committees at this time, and due to its small size does not believe that committees are necessary at this time. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, the Company’s entire Board fulfills the duties of an audit committee. None of the directors held any directorships during the past five years in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of such act, or of any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Aaron Klusman – Chairman and CEO

Aaron Klusman is Chairman and CEO of the Company. Mr. Klusman is a serial entrepreneur and private investor who specializes in real estate development. Mr. Klusman co-founded Camelback Realty Group, LLC in 2005 as a real estate holding company and member or partner in other real estate LLCs and partnerships. He is Co-Founder/Managing Partner in the private investment firm Camelback Partners and is a Co-Founder/Managing Partner of Camelback Realty Group, which invests principally in real estate land and development. Mr. Klusman is Founder/Owner of Neighborhood Concepts, under which he has founded such companies as Zoyo Neighborhood Yogurt, Modern Grove Neighborhood Eatery & Market and Neighborhood Initiatives Beverage Co, in 2016. He is a partner in First Cup, a regional franchisee of Dunkin Donuts, where he assists with business development throughout Arizona, Nevada, California and Colorado. Mr. Klusman also founded Klusman Family Holdings, LLC in 2009, a holding company for other real estate entities. Mr. Klusman serves on the boards of Grand Canyon University’s Colangelo College of Business, Hustle PHOENIX, Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and is the Chairman and founder of Camelback Society. Mr. Klusman graduated from Arizona State University in 2003. Mr. Klusman also serves as an officer and director of Chee Corp, a publicly held commercial and real estate company.

Michael J. Witherill – Co-Chairman and President

Mike Witherill is Vice-Chairman and President of the Company. He has produced numerous movies in the last seven years, including Drinking Buddies (staring Ana Kendrick, Olivia Wilde and Jake Johnson), Frontera (staring Ed Harris, Eva Longoria, Amy Madigan and Michael Pena), Cardboard Boxer (staring Thomas Hayden Church, Terrence Howard and Boyd Holbrook), and John Wick (starring Keanu Reeves). Mr. Witherill is also the producer of the music movie Stuck (staring Ashanti Douglas, Giancarlo Esposito, Amy Madigan, Arden Cho, Omar Chaparro and Gerard Canonico), which has won multiple film festival awards. Mr. Witherill founded Rise Entertainment, a motion picture production company, in 2012, for which he was the manager and CEO until he sold his interest in 2013. He was the manager of Frontera Productions, LLC, an entity wholly owned by Rise Entertainment and the entity in which the movie Frontera was produced. Mr. Witherill was manager of H & W Movie Partners, LLC since 2009, an entity involved with the production of the movie A Little Bit of Heaven. Mr. Witherill co-founded MJW Films, LLC in 2013. He was a co-manager of MJW Films, LLC until July 2014. MJW Films, LLC declared bankruptcy in 2018. MJW Films, LLC created the special purpose movie production entities Stuck Productions, LLC and its related entity Stuck Movie, Inc., J Wick Productions, LLC, Planet Productions, LLC, and Cardboard Productions, LLC. Mr. Witherill was the CEO of each of these entities. Mr. Witherill co-founded MJW Media, LLC in 2013, and served as its CEO until its merger with MJW Media, Inc. in 2016. MJW Media, LLC was a producer loan out and movie production/development company. Mr. Witherill co-founded MJW Music, LLC in 2013, and was its CEO until its merger with MJW Music, Inc. in 2016. MJW Music, LLC was a film, music and talent music production company. Mr. Witherill received a football scholarship to Arizona State University where he played and graduated in 1985 with a BA in Business. Mr. Witherill was the Co-Founder of the largest Dunkin Donuts franchisee in the western United States with over 50 current locations which he operated from 2007 to 2012. Mr. Witherill also served as an officer and director of Chee Corp., a publicly held acquisition company.

John Morgan – Director

John Morgan is managing partner at Falding Capital Group, and Executive Vice President and Secretary of Technical Air Products. Mr. Morgan has over fifty years of business development and management experience. He worked in the publishing and printing business for thirty-one years. He has owned many publishing businesses that include Graph-Ads, Inc. in Alma, MI; Advance Newspapers in Grand Rapids, MI; Flashes Publishers, Allegan, MI serving all of Southwest Michigan; TDI Talking Phone Books in Grand Rapids, MI serving Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, and Florida; and others. In 1999, Mr. Morgan sold his publishing business with his partner, Hank Meijer, to McCloud USA which at the time was the fourth largest telecom company in the US. In late 2000, Mr. Morgan acquired Eagle Tugs, an aviation and industrial material handling manufacturer in Detroit, MI. Eagle Tugs was sold to Tronair in December 2015, which was owned by private equity firm Golden Gate Capital. In early 2000, Mr. Morgan, through Falding Capital, purchased Cannon Truck Equipment, which is a complex truck equipment up-fitter in Macomb County, MI. In 2018, Mr. Morgan sold Cannon Truck Equipment to Versalift, which was owned by private equity firm Sterling Capital. Mr. Morgan also served on the Board of Directors of the Bank of Alma from 1975-1997. Prior to 2006, Mr. Morgan was also President of American Cargo, a dry freight and cutaway cube van manufacturer. Mr. Morgan graduated from Michigan State University with a BA in Communications in 1968. He has been married to Karley Deckrow Morgan since 1967. He and Karley have three children, Karri Gabridge, Kacie McLean, and Jace Morgan. They also have ten grandchildren. He and Karley reside in Naples, FL.

John “Jack” Douglas Wilenchik - Director

Jack Wilenchik is a practicing trial attorney and partner at the law firm of Wilenchik & Bartness, P.C. in Phoenix, Arizona, and has been with the firm for over 10 years. He holds one of the thirty largest jury verdicts in Arizona history and the largest jury verdict in the history of Mohave County, and has been listed on the national Superlawyers list of “Top Rated Attorneys” published by Thomson Reuters. Mr. Wilenchik has represented a number of public figures in the entertainment, political, and business space over the years and handled numerous high-profile cases in Arizona. In his spare time, he serves as a “substitute judge” (judge pro tem) and sits on two boards for the City of Phoenix, named the Heritage Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission. He has served pro bono as a volunteer attorney for the Goldwater Institute, the Rutherford Institute, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, as well as a special advisor to the Maricopa County Community Legal Services Volunteer Lawyers Program, and a regular volunteer for the Wills for Heroes program which prepares wills for law enforcement. Mr. Wilenchik has hosted and co-hosted a number of talk shows on AM radio on subjects including the law, entertainment, and consumer affairs. As a young man, Mr. Wilenchik lived for several years abroad, attending boarding school in Scotland and then a campus for international students in Italy. He is conversant in Spanish and studied Italian, Mandarin Chinese, and Hebrew at New York University from 2001-2004. He then moved back home to Arizona and studied Mathematics at Arizona State University, where he obtained a degree in interdisciplinary studies. In 2011 he obtained his law degree from Phoenix School of Law. Mr. Wilenchik is an avid fan of film and television production and personally produced/co-wrote small-budget film in the Phoenix area. He and his wife have two daughters and a son, all born in Phoenix.

Executive Officers

The executive officers serving the Company are as follows:

Mr. Klusman’s and Mr. Witherill’s biographical information is incorporated by reference to the board membership section of Part III Item 10 above.

Rick Gean – Interim Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Gean started his career in public accounting in 1983. Since April 2015, Mr. Gean has run Gean Accounting Services, acting as virtual CFO and providing finance and accounting services for numerous companies, including acting as CFO of PowerOneData International, Inc., an international smart grid company, and serving as financial advisor to Plum Mountain Imaging Corp., an MRI System rental and services company, to Arrestage International, Inc., a natural skin care company, and to Mind and Body Research, Inc., a start-up in the nutritional supplement and topical pain relief industry.

Prior to that, Mr. Gean worked with several emerging growth companies, including serving as Director of Mergers and Acquisitions and CFO for a regional investment banking firm. Mr. Gean also worked in corporate finance with a subsidiary of a California based venture capital firm, specializing in providing corporate finance and accelerator services. He acted as CFO for a nutraceutical manufacturing company and consultant to a publicly held company with a novel drug delivery technology, assisting in merger negotiations and fund raising activities. Beginning on March 2, 2021, Mr. Gean has served as CFO, Secretary, and Treasurer of Chee Corp., a business principally engaged in the commercial real estate business in Arizona and an affiliate of the Company. Mr. Gean attended University of Arizona, majoring in Public Administration, and Arizona State University, majoring in Accounting.

There are no agreements or understandings for any officer or director to resign at the request of another person, and none of the officers or directors is acting on behalf of, or will act at the direction of, any other person. There are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors.

Significant Employees

Rob Paris – President of Rivulet Films

Rob Paris serves as President of Rivulet Films, a significant subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Paris started his career as a literary agent at Creative Artists Agency where he packaged and arranged finance for dozens of iconic projects including Scream, I Know What You Did Last Summer, Dawson’s Creek, Donnie Darko, One Hour Photo and The Day After Tomorrow, which grossed over $500 million worldwide. After a decade in the representation business, Mr. Paris formed Mission Entertainment, a development and production fund backed by Comcast/Spectacor CEO Ed Snider. As head of development he acquired and packaged Whip It! as a directorial debut for Drew Barrymore. Fox Searchlight released the film, which starred Barrymore, Ellen Page, Kristin Wiig, Jimmy Fallon and Juliette Lewis. Paris later launched his company Paris Film, Inc. and acquired the spec screenplay The Maiden Heist, which attracted an ensemble cast of Oscar^® winners and nominees, including Morgan Freeman, Christopher Walken, William H. Macy, and Marcia Gay Harden. The film was financed by Yari Film Group and acquired by Sony Pictures Worldwide. Shortly after, Paris Film, Inc. launched production on Black List comedy Dirty Girl with Juno Temple, Milla Jovovich, William H. Macy, Mary Steenburgen, Dwight Yoakam, and Tim McGraw.

Mr. Paris later formed Crime Scene Pictures, a finance and production company backed by private equity from Singapore and Indonesia. Within weeks of its launch, Mr. Paris assembled the financing and produced a remake of Gambit, written by Academy Award winners Joel and Ethan Coen and starring Academy Award winner Colin Firth, Cameron Diaz Alan Rickman, and Stanley Tucci. CBS Films preemptively acquired US distribution rights at the European Film Market in Berlin. That same year, Mr. Paris acquired and packaged Everly, an action tour de force starring Academy Award nominee Salma Hayek. Paris recently returned to the world of horror, producing back to back films with writer/director Osgood Perkins. The Blackcoat’s Daughter, starring Emma Roberts, Kiernan Shipka, and Lucy Boynton sold to A24 amidst competitive bidding at the Toronto International Film Festival, and I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House, starring Golden Globe winner Ruth Wilson. Mr. Paris produced The Last Laugh, distributed by Netflix and starring Chevy Chase, Academy Award winner Richard Dreyfuss and Andie MacDowell. Mr. Paris graduated from the University of California at Santa Barbara with a Bachelors of Arts degree in Film Studies in 1992.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, other than as described below with respect to Mr. Witherill, none of the Incoming Directors has, during the past ten years:

MJW Films, LLC, filed a petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona on October 22, 2018, under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Michael J. Witherill was Chief Executive Officer of MJW Films, LLC, at the time of the filing, but has subsequently resigned that position. On August 18, 2020, the matter was converted to a petition under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The parties in the bankruptcy proceeding have negotiated a settlement agreement and a hearing on the motion to approve compromise/settlement was held in December 2020 and approved in January 2021. However, certain parties in the proceedings have filed a motion for relief from judgment and a motion for reconsideration of the trustee’s order confirming the sale. A hearing on these motions is scheduled for May, 2022.

J Wick Productions, LLC, filed a petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona on October 26, 2018, under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Michael J. Witherill was an officer of J Wick Productions, LLC at the time of filing. The parties have now settled the matter and on September 29, 2020, an order granting the motion for final decree was entered with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Such persons are further required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms (including Forms 3, 4 and 5) that they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us with respect to fiscal year.

During the most recent fiscal year the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the following Section 16(a) forms were filed late: John Morgan (one Form 3 with one transaction), Blue Scout Enterprises LLC (one Form 4 with one transaction); Michael Witherill (one Form 4 with one transaction), Rick Gean (one Form 3).

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to our directors, officers and employees. The Code is filed as Exhibit A of our Information Statement Pursuant to Section 14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with the Commission on August 11, 2006. A written copy of the Code will be provided upon request at no charge by writing to our Chief Executive Officer, Aaron Klusman, at:

1206 East Warner Road, Suite 101-I 

Gilbert, Arizona 85296

Nominating Procedures

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which our stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors during our last fiscal year. 

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company is not a “listed company” under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and is therefore not required to have an audit committee comprised of independent directors. The Company does not currently have an audit committee, however, for certain purposes of the rules and regulations of the SEC and in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company’s  Board of Directors is deemed to be its  audit committee and as such functions as an audit committee and performs some of the same functions as an audit committee including: (1) selection and oversight of our independent accountant; (2) establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; and (3) engaging outside advisors.

ITEM 11 – EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Overview of Compensation Program

We currently have not appointed members to serve on a Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Until a formal committee is established, our entire Board of Directors has responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence with the Company’s compensation philosophy. The Board of Directors ensures that the total compensation paid to the executives is fair, reasonable, and competitive.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Board of Directors believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one that is designed to reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals by the Company and that aligns executives’ interests with those of the stockholders by rewarding performance above established goals, with the ultimate objective of improving stockholder value. As a result of the size of the Company, the Board evaluates both performance and compensation on an informal basis. Upon hiring additional executives, the Board intends to establish a Compensation Committee to evaluate both performance and compensation to ensure that the Company maintains its ability to attract and retain superior employees in key positions and that compensation provided to key employees remains competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives of peer companies. To that end, the Board believes executive compensation packages provided by the Company to its executives, including the named executive officers should include both cash and stock-based compensation that reward performance as measured against established goals.

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

The Board of Directors makes all compensation decisions for, and approves recommendations regarding equity awards to, the executive officers and directors of the Company. Decisions regarding the non-equity compensation of other employees of the Company are made by management.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal year, certain information regarding the compensation earned by the Company’s named executive officers.

Director Compensation

Compensation paid to Mr. Klusman, Mr. Witherill and Mr. Gean disclosed in the above table. No compensation was paid to Mr. Morgan or Mr. Wilenchik, both of whom are non-employee directors.

Employment Agreements

On August 12, 2020, the Company, and Michael J. Witherill entered into an Employment Agreement with respect to his positions as President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Witherill receives an annual salary of $360,000, payable in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices, provided that such amount may be deferred as determined by Mr. Witherill or the Board of Directors as needed to cover other Company expenses and provided further that Mr. Witherill is permitted to serve as a director of not-for-profit and for-profit businesses that do not compete with the Company. The Employment Agreement was amended on January 26, 2021, to additionally allow Mr. Witherill to serve as an officer and director of Chee Corp. During the year ended July 31, 2021, the Company recorded a charge to operations of $360,000 with respect to this Employment Agreement, which was charged to general and administrative costs. Mr. Witherill resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective October 26, 2021.

On August 14, 2020, the Company and Aaron Klusman entered into an Employment Agreement with respect to his positions as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Klusman receives an annual salary of $360,000, payable in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices, provided that such amount may be deferred as determined by Mr. Klusman or the Board of Directors as needed to cover other Company expenses, and provided further that Mr. Klusman is permitted to purchase, sell, oversee, manage, and develop real estate properties and projects; and serve as a director of not for profit and for profit businesses that do not compete with the Company. Mr. Klusman also serves as an officer and director of Chee Corp. During the year ended July 31, 2021, the Company recorded a charge to operations of $360,000 with respect to this Employment Agreement, which was charged to general and administrative costs. As of July 31, 2021, Mr., Klusman has deferred $484,670 of his salary.

The employment of Mr. Witherill and Mr. Klusman commenced effective April 1, 2020, and will continue for two years, subject to successive one-year renewals. Each executive is an “at-will” employee. Either the executive or the Company may terminate his employment with or without cause, for any reason or no reason, and at any time. The executives are each subject to standard confidentiality provisions and a non-compete, non-solicitation covenant for a one-year period following termination of employment

On May 27, 2020, the Company, and Paris Film, Inc., and Rob Paris (together, “Paris”) entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Paris Agreement”), pursuant which the Company agreed to employ Paris in the position of President of Rivulet Films, a subsidiary of the Company. The employment of Paris began on June 1, 2020, for a guaranteed term of six months, following which time the employment relationship may be terminated with or without good cause or for any reason or no reason by either the Paris or the Company.

Paris was paid $10,000 per month commencing June 1, 2020, through November 30, 2020, which was increased to $15,000 per month beginning on March 1, 2021. Additionally, the Company issued stock options to purchase 9,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share, which was the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on such date, of which options for 5,000,000 shares vested on May 27, 2020, options for 2,000,000 shares vested on June 1, 2021, and the remaining options for 2,000,000 shares will vest on June 1, 2022.

ITEM 12 – SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of April 30, 2022, certain information regarding beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by (a) each person known by the Company to be a beneficial owner of five percent or more of the outstanding common or preferred stock of the Company, (b) each executive officer, director and nominee for director of the Company, and (c) directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. As of April 30, 2022, there were 144,045,171 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding. In computing the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by a person, shares of common stock that a person has a right to acquire within sixty (60) days of April 30, 2022, pursuant to stock options, or other rights are counted as outstanding, while these shares are not counted as outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each stockholder listed in the following table is c/o Rivulet Media, Inc., 1206 E. Warner Road #101-I, Gilbert, Arizona, 85296. This table is based upon information supplied by the Company’s directors, officers and principal stockholders and reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Common Stock Share Ownership

There are no arrangements, including any pledge of securities that may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” contained in Item 5 of this Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 12.

ITEM 13 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Transactions with Related Persons

During the period from February 11, 2020 (date of inception) through April 30, 2020, Rivulet Films entered into four common stock subscription agreements aggregating $700,000. Three of the subscription’s receivable aggregating $150,000 for 5,023,800 shares of common stock were paid in April 2020. The remaining $550,000 of subscriptions receivable from Blue Scout Enterprises LLC (“Blue Scout”), a related party, to purchase 11,000,000 shares of common stock was presented as a reduction to stockholders’ deficiency in the consolidated balance sheet at July 31, 2020.

The $550,000 subscription receivable from Blue Scout dated February 11, 2020, for 11,000,000 shares of common stock is unsecured and provides for interest payable to the Company at 2% per annum, with interest and principal due on March 7, 2023. Interest income is being recognized on a cash basis as and when received by the Company. Interest income as of July 31, 2021, that had not been recognized by the Company was $14,971.

As of July 31, 2020, the Company had paid producer fees to Michael Witherill, the president and a director of the Company, totaling $51,500.

During the year ended July 31, 2021, the Company paid producer fees to Michael Witherill of $25,000, which are accounted for as project development costs in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at July 31, 2021.

Between December 15, 2020, and December 26, 2020, the Company’s subsidiary Mistress Movie LLC issued six short-term promissory notes to Cross Entertainment, LLC, an entity controlled by Michael Witherill, aggregating $170,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of February 28, 2021. Mr. Witherill is the sole member and manager of Cross Entertainment, LLC, and is president and a director of the Company. As of January 31, 2021, $60,000 had been repaid and the remaining principal amount of $110,000 was due on these notes. On February 26, 2021, the maturity date of the $110,000 principal amount of the notes were extended to June 30, 2021. On June 30, 2021. the maturity date of the note was extended to June 30, 2022. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K the remaining principal balance of these notes is $86,679.

On December 26, 2020, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Cross Entertainment, LLC, for $110,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of June 30, 2021. The Company received proceeds of $10,000 on this note through April 30, 2021. On January 31, 2021, the principal balance of the note dated January 7, 2021, of $85,000 was transferred to this note as described below. As of April 30, 2021, principal amount of $95,000 was due on this note. On June 30, 2021, the maturity date of this note was extended to December 31, 2021. The Company repaid this note in full on August 9, 2021.

On January 7, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Cross Entertainment, LLC, for $145,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of January 31, 2021. Proceeds on this note were $145,000, of which $60,000 was repaid and the balance of $85,000 was transferred a note dated December 26, 2020, as described above. As of July 31, 2021, the note was paid off.

On January 29, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Cross Entertainment, LLC, for $85,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of February 28, 2021. On February 26, 2021, the maturity date of this note was extended to June 30, 2021. As of July 31, 2021, principal of $7,000 was due on this note. On June 30, 2021, the maturity date of this note was extended to August 31, 2021. The Company repaid this note in full on August 9, 2021.

On May 6, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Cross Entertainment, LLC, for $70,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of July 31, 2021. On July 31, 2021, the maturity date of this note was extended to December 31, 2021. The note was repaid on September 22, 2021.

On May 12, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Cross Entertainment, LLC, for $50,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of June 30, 2021. On June 30, 2021, the maturity date of this note was extended to December 31, 2021. The note was repaid on September 22, 2021.

On June 30, 2021, Mistress Movie LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Films, and Cross Entertainment, L.L.C. entered into five amendments to promissory notes. The amendments extend the maturity dates of promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $110,000 from June 30, 2021, to June 30, 2022. All other provisions of the promissory notes remain the same.

On June 30, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Aaron Klusman, the CEO and a director of the Company, for $40,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of July 15, 2021. The note was repaid on July 13, 2021.

On July 21, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Aaron Klusman for $40,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of September 21, 2021. On September 21, 2021, the maturity date of the note was extended to February 28, 2022. On October 10, 2021, $15,000 of principle was repaid. On October 21, 2021, $15,000 of principle was repaid. The remaining balance of $10,000 was transferred to the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman, as described below.

On July 22, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Michael Witherill for $50,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of February 28, 2022. On November 23, 2021, the note was transferred to the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Witherill, as described below.

On August 2, 2021, Good News Productions, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Rivulet Films, executed a promissory note payable to Mike Witherill pursuant to which the Company borrowed $45,000. The note was scheduled to mature on February 28, 2022. On February 28, 2022, the maturity date of the note was extended to June 30, 2022.

On August 11, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Michael Witherill for $50,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of November 11, 2021. On November 23, 2021, the note was transferred to the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Witherill.

On August 16, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Aaron Klusman for $50,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of November 19, 2021. On November 19, 2021, the maturity date of the note was extended to October 31, 2022. On November 23, 2021, the note was transferred to the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman.

On August 16, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Michael Witherill for $50,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of February 28, 2022. On November 23, 2021, the note was transferred to the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Witherill.

On August 19, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Aaron Klusman for $54,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of November 19, 2021. On November 19, 2021, the maturity date of the note was extended to October 31, 2022. On November 23, 2021, the note was transferred to the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman.

On August 24, 2021, the Company issued a short-term promissory note to Michael Witherill for $40,000, without interest, with a scheduled maturity date of February 28, 2022. On November 23, 2021, the note was transferred to the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Witherill.

On October 7, 2021, the Company executed a Promissory Note payable to John Morgan, a director of the Company, pursuant to which the Company borrowed $50,000. The note was scheduled to mature on November 7, 2021, is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum, and the unpaid balance may be accelerated upon an event of default thereunder. On November 7, 2021, the maturity date of the note was extended to April 30, 2022.

On November 23, 2021, the Company and Michael Witherill entered into a Multiple Advance Promissory Note, pursuant to which the Company may borrow up to an aggregate of $300,000 from time to time. This note consolidated and replaced multiple individual Promissory Notes previously executed by the Company and payable to Mr. Witherill with an aggregate outstanding balance of $201,170. The note matures on October 31, 2022, is unsecured, bears no interest, and the unpaid balance may be accelerated upon an event of default thereunder. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, the balance due Mr. Witherill under this Note is $0.

On November 23, 2021, the Company and Aaron Klusman entered into a Multiple Advance Promissory Note, pursuant to which the Company may borrow up to an aggregate of $250,000 from time to time. This note consolidated and replaced multiple individual Promissory Notes previously executed by the Company and payable to Mr. Klusman with an aggregate outstanding balance of $178,540. On April 20, 2022, the borrowing capacity under this Note was increased to $1,000,000. The note matures on October 31, 2022, is unsecured, bears no interest, and the unpaid balance may be accelerated upon an event of default thereunder. Mr. Klusman is CEO and a director of the Company. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, the balance due Mr. Klusman under this Note is $640,040.

On February 7, 2022, Good News Productions, LLC executed a promissory note payable to MJW Capital Partners, LLC, a company controlled by Mr. Witherill, pursuant to which the Company borrowed $500,000, with interest at 12% annum. The note is scheduled to mature on February 7, 2023.

On March 14, 2022, Good News Productions, LLC executed a promissory note payable to MJW Capital Partners, LLC pursuant to which the Company borrowed $500,000, with interest at 12% annum. The note is scheduled to mature on March 14, 2023.

On March 25, 2022, Aaron Klusman advanced the Company $30,000 under the terms of the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman.

On April 1, 2022, Michael Witherill advanced the Company advanced $43,000 under the terms of the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021 payable to Mr. Witherill.

On April 11, 2022, Aaron Klusman advanced the Company $56,500 under the terms of the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman.

On April 21, 2022, Aaron Klusman advanced the Company $60,000 under the terms of the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman.

On April 23, 2022, Aaron Klusman advanced the Company $50,000 under the terms of the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman,

On April 26, 2022, Aaron Klusman advanced the Company $50,000 under the terms of the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman.

On April 28, 2022, Aaron Klusman advanced the Company $50,000 under the terms of the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman.

On May 3, 2022, Aaron Klusman advanced the Company $200,000 under the terms of the Multiple Advance Promissory Note dated November 23, 2021, payable to Mr. Klusman.

Promoters and Certain Control Persons

None.

List of Parents

None.

Director Independence

The Company has two independent directors, Mr. Morgan and Mr. Wilenchik. Mr. Witherill and Mr. Klusman, as employees of the Company, are not independent directors.

The Company did not consider any other relationship or transaction between itself and these independent directors not already disclosed in this report in making this independence determination.

ITEM 14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The Company paid or accrued the following fees in each of the prior two fiscal years to its principal accountant, Farber Hass Hurley LLP:

Audit related fees include fees for reviewing the Form 10-K filing. All other fees are from consultation on tax related issues.

All services listed were pre-approved by the Board of Directors, functioning as the Audit Committee in accordance with Section 2(a)(3) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Board has considered whether the services described above are compatible with maintaining the independent accountant’s independence and has determined that such services have not adversely affected Farber Hass Hurley LLP’s independence.

PART IV

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Financial Statements and Schedules

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1.

Exhibit Index

Except as otherwise indicated (a) all exhibits were previously filed, (b) all omitted exhibits are intentionally omitted, and (c) all Reports referenced below were filed under SEC file number 000-32201.

ITEM 16 – FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None. 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: May 12, 2022

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Dated: May 12, 2022

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rivulet Media, Inc.
Gilbert, Arizona

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Rivulet Media Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of July 31, 2021 and 2020 and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2021, and for the period from February 11, 2020 (inception) through July 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of July 31, 2021 and 2020 and the results of its consolidated operations and its consolidated cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2021, and for the period from February 11, 2020 (inception) through July 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations and negative operating cash flows since inception. The Company has financed its working capital requirements during this period primarily through the sale of its equity securities and the issuance of short term notes. Accordingly, management has concluded that these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Project Development Costs – Third Party Accounting – Refer to Note 7 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company’s valuation of project development costs involves reception of third-party information such as deposits held by third party payroll processor, payroll amounts disbursed, receipt of vendor invoices received by third party accountants, and payment of vendor invoices by subsidiary entities. The Company uses third party information to determine the appropriate amount to capitalize as project development costs or accrue as prepaid expenses or accrued expenses. Since there may be delays in receiving information from subsidiaries or third parties, accrual and capitalization of production costs may be subject to estimates by management based on project milestones. Additionally, product development costs are subject to periodic evaluation for impairment.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures involved testing cutoff of project development costs of the Company’s subsidiaries. All subsidiary production cost transactions were evaluated for correct cutoff and the balance of the production costs were adjusted for correct period allocation, either as accrued expenses, prepaid expenses, or capitalized production costs. Proposed adjustments were accepted by management and recorded. Management’s ability and experience was evaluated to assess assumptions made for potential impairment of production costs.

Convertible Notes Payable – Valuation of Embedded Conversion Feature – Refer to Note 8 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company issued debt in the form of convertible promissory notes which included an embedded conversion feature. Management evaluated the embedded conversion feature and determined that the feature was required to be bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative liability. Calculations and accounting for the convertible promissory note and embedded conversion features require management’s judgments related to initial and subsequent recognition of the debt and related features, use of a valuation model, and value of the inputs used in the selected valuation model.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to testing the valuation of the derivative liability included:

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.

/s/ Farber Hass Hurley LLP
Oxnard, California
May 12, 2022

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

(Continued)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

(Continued)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.