Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 000-51485

Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(407) 333-7440

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  x    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of November 2, 2007 was 23,211,540.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” that reflect, when made, the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements frequently are identified by the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “project,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” or other similar words and phrases. Similarly, statements herein that describe the Company’s objectives, plans or goals also are forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected, implied or anticipated by the Company’s forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ include: the impact of adverse weather conditions on the Company’s operations; changes in economic conditions and trends generally; changes in consumer preferences or discretionary spending; the effect of competition in the restaurant industry; the Company’s ability to achieve market acceptance, particularly in new markets; the Company’s ability to achieve and manage its planned expansion; the Company’s ability to execute its business strategy effectively; health concerns about beef or other food products; reductions in the availability of, or increases in the cost of, USDA Prime grade beef and other food items; labor shortages or increases in labor costs; the impact of federal, state or local government regulations relating to Company employees, the sale or preparation of food, the sale of alcoholic beverages and the opening of new restaurants; harmful actions taken by the Company’s franchisees; the Company’s ability to protect its name and logo and other proprietary information; the impact of litigation; and the loss of key management personnel. For a discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed by the Company, as well as the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), all of which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement, and the Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.

2

Table of Contents

Unless the context otherwise indicates, all references in this report to the “Company,” “Ruth’s Chris,” “we,” “us”, or “our” or similar words are to Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc., and its direct wholly owned subsidiaries. Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, and was founded in 1965.

Stockholders and other security holders or buyers of our securities or our other creditors should not assume that material events subsequent to the date of this report have not occurred.

3

Table of Contents

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

RUTH’S CHRIS STEAK HOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

RUTH’S CHRIS STEAK HOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Income Statements - Unaudited

(dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

RUTH’S CHRIS STEAK HOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Unaudited

(dollar amounts in thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

RUTH’S CHRIS STEAK HOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

(1) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. and its subsidiaries (together, the “Company”) as of September 30, 2007 and for the fiscal quarters and thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2007 and September 24, 2006 have been prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. The interim results of operations for the fiscal quarters and thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2007 and September 24, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally presented in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

The Company operates on a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in December. The fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2007 and September 24, 2006 each contained 13 weeks and are referred to herein as the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and the third quarter of fiscal 2006, respectively. When combined, the first, second and third quarters of each fiscal year are referred to as the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 and the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006, respectively.

Estimates – Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reporting of revenue and expenses during the period to prepare these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of property and equipment, goodwill, and obligations related to workers’ compensation and medical insurance. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications – Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income. Specifically, insurance proceeds related to the hurricane were reclassified and netted against hurricane related expenses within operating income versus being reported as non-operating income. Additionally, the net losses on the disposal of property and equipment were reclassified from other non-operating expense to operating income.

(2) Stock-Based Employee Compensation

As of September 30, 2007, the Company has the following share-based compensation plans:

2000 Stock Option Plan

The Company established a stock option plan which allows the Company’s Board of Directors to grant stock options to directors, officers, key employees and other key individuals performing services for the Company. The 2000 Stock Option Plan authorizes grants of options to purchase up to 1,765,981 shares of authorized but unissued common stock. The 2000 Stock Option Plan provides for granting of options to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price not less than the fair value of the stock on the date of grant. Options are exercisable at various periods ranging from one to ten years from date of grant. Under the 2000 Stock Option Plan there are 239,525 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of currently outstanding options at September 30, 2007 and 613,258 shares available for future grants. No future grants are expected to be made under the 2000 Stock Option Plan.

2004 Restricted Stock Plan

The Company established a restricted stock plan, which allows the Company’s Board of Directors to facilitate the purchase of restricted stock by directors, officers and other key employees. The 2004 Restricted Stock Plan authorized restricted stock purchases of up to 1,167,487 shares of authorized but unissued common stock. Under the Company’s 2004 Restricted Stock Plan, there are 1,167,487 shares of common stock issued and no shares available for future grants. Related to the departure of an executive officer during the first quarter of 2007, the Company reacquired 71,950 shares of restricted common stock for the same price per share as paid by the officer during 2004. The shares have been placed in treasury stock with a cost basis equivalent to the purchase price of less than $1.

7

Table of Contents

2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan

In connection with the initial public offering, the Company adopted the Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Equity Incentive Plan”), which allows the Company’s Board of Directors to grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units and other equity-based awards to directors, officers, key employees and other key individuals performing services for the Company. The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provides for granting of options to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price not less than the fair value of the stock on the date of grant. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company granted 208,841 stock options at an exercise price of $17.17 per share which was the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant. Under the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, there are 1,257,299 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of currently outstanding options at September 30, 2007 and 1,097,706 shares available for future grants.

Total compensation expense recognized under these plans for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 24, 2006 and September 30, 2007 was $423 and $1,123, respectively.

(3) Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

On August 7, 2007, the Company completed a second amendment to its senior credit facility to increase its availability under the facility to $150.0 million. The Company’s ability to request additional funding through the revolving credit facility also increased with this amendment to $50.0 million, for a total potential borrowing of $200.0 million. The amendment also provides that $50.0 million in proceeds may be utilized to repurchase the Company’s common stock, extends the maturity date of the outstanding principal from March 11, 2010 to August 7, 2012, and changes the maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio in the financial covenants to 3.25:1.00. All other financial covenants, restrictive covenants and terms of the increased revolving credit facility remain unchanged.

On September 13, 2007, the Company entered into a three year interest rate swap to limit the variability of its interest payments. The notional amounts total $75.0 million through September 17, 2008, $50.0 million through September 17, 2009 and $25.0 million through its expiration on September 17, 2010 of the then outstanding debt under its senior credit facility. Previously, the Company had two interest rate swaps in place that have been terminated as a result of this new transaction. The Company does not use hedge accounting to account for this swap.

As of September 30, 2007, the Company had an aggregate of $95.3 million of outstanding indebtedness under its senior credit facility at a weighted average interest rate of 6.6%. The Company had approximately $51.7 million of borrowings available under its revolving credit facility, net of outstanding letters of credit of approximately $3.0 million. An additional $50.0 million is also available upon the Company’s request. The Company is required to maintain certain financial covenants and is also subject to restrictive covenants under its borrowings. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants at September 30, 2007. The Company’s obligations under the senior credit facility are guaranteed by each of its existing and future subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of its assets and a pledge of the capital stock of its subsidiaries.

(4) Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share were computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period. For the fiscal quarter ended and the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2007, options to purchase 1,257,299 and 188,500 shares, respectively of the Company’s common stock at weighted average exercise prices of $16.52 and $18.82 per share, respectively were not included in the calculation of weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share because their effects were anti-dilutive.

8

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

(5) Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is subject to various claims, possible legal actions, and other matters arising in the normal course of business. Management does not expect disposition of these other matters to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

(6) Discontinued Operations

On June 25, 2006, the Company closed its Cleveland, Ohio restaurant whose lease term ended in September 2006. The Company accounted for its exit costs in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which required that such costs be expensed in the period such costs are incurred. All of these costs incurred are included in discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated income statements. The Company determined that the closed restaurant should be accounted for as discontinued operations because the Company does not expect any further direct or indirect cash inflows from the discontinued restaurant, since the restaurant has completely ceased operation.

On December 24, 2004, the Company closed its Manhattan-UN, New York restaurant operation, one of its two Ruth’s Chris Steak House locations in Manhattan, New York. Prior to and including 2004, the Company experienced operating losses at its Manhattan-UN, New York restaurant location, which leased the property on which it operated. During August 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with the Manhattan-UN, New York landlord whereby: (1) the Company made a one-time payment of $0.3 million to the landlord for rent, commission on replacement lease, and attorney’s fees; (2) the existing lease was terminated; (3) the Company allowed the landlord to contract with a third party replacement tenant; and (4) adjusted the remaining contingent lease term from eleven years to six years. Under the agreement, after the third anniversary, if the replacement tenant defaults on the new lease anytime during the remaining six years, the Company will be required to enter into a new agreement with landlord for the remaining term. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company was notified that the replacement tenant was placed in default by the landlord. As a result, the Company may be required to resume lease payments in respect of this property as soon as the third quarter of fiscal 2008, which payments will total $0.2 million in the aggregate per fiscal quarter through September 1, 2014. In the event that the Company becomes required to make these lease payments, it expects to sublease the property for the duration of the lease term in order to recover some or all of the amounts paid in respect of the lease. The Company may, however, be unable to find a sub-lessee for part or all of the remaining lease term. At September 30, 2007, the Company maintained a contingent lease liability of $0.2 million related to this property.

The Company accounts for its closed restaurants in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144. Therefore, when a restaurant is closed, and the restaurant is either held for sale or abandoned, the restaurant’s operations are eliminated from the ongoing operations. Accordingly, the operations of such restaurants, net of applicable income taxes, are presented as discontinued operations and prior period operations of such restaurants, net of applicable income taxes, are reclassified.

9

Table of Contents

Discontinued operations consist of the following:

(7) New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), on January 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 did not result in any changes to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions. As of the date of adoption, the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled approximately $650, all of which, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate there will be any material changes in the unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, the Company had accrued approximately $134 for the payment of interest, which is included as a component of the $650 unrecognized tax benefit noted above.

The Company files consolidated and separate income tax returns in the United States Federal jurisdiction, many state jurisdictions and Puerto Rico. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for years before 2003 and is no longer subject to state and local or Puerto Rico income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002.

(8) Recent Accounting Pronouncements For Future Application

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. (“SFAS 157”) clarifies the definition of fair value, describes methods used to appropriately measure fair value, and expands fair value disclosure requirements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that currently require or permit fair value measurements and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 157 will have on the consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet, statements of income or cash flows.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. The provisions of SFAS 159 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 159 will have on the consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet, statements of income or cash flows.

Other accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

(9) Acquisitions

On September 10, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of three previously franchised restaurants from Mr. Steven Queyrouze (the “Seller”) pursuant to the asset purchase agreements dated as of April 16, 2007. The acquired restaurants are located in Bellevue and Seattle, Washington; and Portland, Oregon. In connection with the acquisition, the Company acquired all of the Seller’s interests in the three aforementioned Ruth’s Chris Steak House restaurants for approximately $13.25 million in cash. The acquisition was financed with borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.

10

Table of Contents

The results of the operations of the three purchased franchises have been included in the Company’s consolidated income statement from the date of acquisition. The Company allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired in the acquisition at their estimated fair values with the remainder allocated to goodwill and other intangibles. The below table summarizes the allocation of proceeds paid to the seller as well as acquisition costs. Approximately $174 associated with legal and closing costs are included in goodwill and other intangibles. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price is summarized below.

On August 6, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Design Custom Millwork, Inc., a millwork company, pursuant to the asset purchase agreement dated as of July 24, 2007. All assets were purchased for approximately $260 in cash. The Company allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired in the acquisition at their estimated fair values with the remainder allocated to goodwill and other intangibles as follows: $139 to property, plant and equipment and $121 to goodwill and other intangibles.

Overview

The Company is an owner, operator and franchisor of upscale steakhouses. As of September 30, 2007, there were 109 Ruth’s Chris Steak House restaurants, of which 57 are company-owned and 52 are franchisee-owned, including ten international franchisee-owned restaurants in Mexico, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Canada.

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, provides additional information about the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.

Hurricane and Relocation Costs, Net of Insurance Proceeds.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company’s corporate office building in Metairie, Louisiana was damaged by Hurricane Katrina and the Company subsequently relocated its corporate offices to Heathrow, Florida. The Company’s restaurants in New Orleans and Metairie, Louisiana, were also damaged by the hurricane. The New Orleans restaurant has not reopened and the Metairie restaurant reopened in December, 2005. The Company had completed the construction and preopening activities for a new restaurant in Biloxi, Mississippi, that was also lost due to Hurricane Katrina. Related to these events, the Company incurred expenses of $0.6 million and $0.2 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006 and the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007, respectively which includes severance and relocation payments to employees and insurance deductibles for the two New Orleans, Louisiana area restaurants; severance payments; and temporary living, relocation costs and other expenses for the Company’s relocation from Metairie, Louisiana to Heathrow, Florida. These expenses were offset by net insurance proceeds that were received of $1.4 million and $3.7 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006 and the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007, respectively. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company finalized its claim and does not expect any significant expenses or proceeds related to the Hurricane Katrina in the future.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123R. Under the provisions of SFAS 123R, share-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by an option pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite period. The option pricing models require judgmental assumptions including volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. If any of the assumptions used in the model change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ in the future from that recorded in the current period.

11

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The table below sets forth certain operating data expressed as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated. The Company’s historical results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected in the future.

Third Quarter of Fiscal 2007 (13 Weeks) Compared to Third Quarter of Fiscal 2006 (13 Weeks)

Restaurant Sales. Restaurant sales increased $11.5 million, or 20.7%, to $67.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $55.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase was due to $6.0 million in incremental sales from new company-owned restaurants that opened in 2006 or in the first thirty-nine weeks of 2007, as well as $5.8 million from the previously franchised restaurants acquired during 2006. These increases were partially offset by a $0.3 million, or 0.4%, decrease in sales from comparable restaurants open throughout both periods. This decrease was due to a reduction in entrees of 3.6%, which was partially offset by an average check increase of 3.2% driven by non-entree increases in bar and lounge traffic, menu selection shifts, and year over year pricing of approximately 1.9%.

Franchise Income. Franchise income increased $0.2 million, or 7.4%, to $2.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $2.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase is primarily due to the impact of nine new franchisee-owned restaurants open year over year and was partially offset by the acquisition of seven franchise-owned restaurants during 2006 and three franchisee-owned restaurants by the Company in the third quarter of fiscal 2007.

Other Operating Income. Other operating income increased $0.1 million, to $0.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $0.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. This increase was due primarily to $109,000 of net gift card breakage during the quarter versus a net gift card breakage loss of $3,000 in the prior year period. The Company recognizes gift card breakage for the remaining value of those cards that have not been redeemed within 18 months following the last date of card activity and when no third-party claim exists.

12

Table of Contents

Food and Beverage Costs. Food and beverage costs increased $3.2 million, or 17.5%, to $21.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $18.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. As a percentage of restaurant sales, food and beverage costs decreased by 1.0% to 32.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from 33.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. This decrease in food and beverage costs as a percentage of restaurant sales was due to various sales mix initiatives, favorable beef costs and modest price increases, partially offset by higher produce and dairy costs.

Restaurant Operating Expenses. Restaurant operating expenses increased $6.8 million, or 25.4%, to $33.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $26.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. Restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of restaurant sales, increased to 50.1% in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from 48.4% in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase in restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales was due to higher management and occupancy expenses related to new restaurant activity as well as higher health care costs.

Marketing and Advertising. Marketing and advertising expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 10.5%, to $1.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $1.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. As a percentage of total revenues, marketing and advertising decreased by 0.7% to 2.5% in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from 3.2% in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. This percentage decrease was primarily due to the reduced utilization of television and local radio in select markets in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 versus the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and the timing of expenditures as the fiscal 2007 marketing plan is more evenly distributed throughout the fiscal year.

General and Administrative. General and administrative costs increased $0.2 million, or 3.7%, to $5.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $5.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. This increase resulted from increased franchise support and development costs, as well as increased stock option compensation expense under FAS123R. These increases are partially offset by reduced levels of incentive compensation. General and administrative costs as a percentage of total revenues, decreased by 1.2% to 8.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from 9.2% in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 as a result of increased sales volume.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.8 million, or 36.4%, to $3.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $2.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase was due primarily to the addition of new company-owned restaurants and acquired restaurants during 2006 through the third quarter of 2007 as well as investments at the Company’s existing company-owned restaurants and corporate headquarters.

Pre-opening Costs. Pre-opening costs totaled $0.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 versus $0.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. These costs relate to new restaurant openings planned for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.

Hurricane and Relocation Costs, net of Insurance Proceeds. During the prior year fiscal quarter, the Company recognized income of $0.9 million from net insurance proceeds related to the Company’s business interruption losses and property losses in New Orleans and Metairie, Louisiana and Biloxi, Mississippi as a result of Hurricane Katrina.

Interest Expense Interest expense increased $0.8 million, or 114.3%, to $1.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $0.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. This increase was primarily due to the additional borrowings related to the 2006 and 2007 acquired restaurants as well as higher interest rates on those borrowings.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased $0.2 million, or 18.2%, to $0.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $1.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in income before income tax, partially offset by an increase in the estimated annual effective tax rate to 32.3% from 32.0%.

Income from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing operations decreased $0.6 million, or 25.0%, to $1.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 from $2.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006.

Discontinued Operations, net of Income Tax Benefit. Discontinued operations decreased $21,000 to $1,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to $22,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. This expense relates to former operations in Cleveland, Ohio and Manhattan, NY. On June 25, 2006 the Company closed its Cleveland, Ohio restaurant whose lease term ended in September 2006. The Company determined that the closed restaurant should be accounted for as discontinued operations because the Company does not expect any further direct or indirect cash inflows from the discontinued restaurant as the restaurant has completely ceased operation. During August 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with the Manhattan-UN, New York landlord whereby: (1) the Company made a one-time payment of $0.3 million to the landlord for rent, commission on replacement lease, and attorneys fees; (2) the existing lease was terminated; (3) the Company allowed the landlord to contract with a third party replacement tenant; and (4) the Company and the landlord adjusted the remaining contingent lease term from eleven years to six years. Under the agreement, after the third anniversary, if the replacement tenant defaults on the new lease anytime during the remaining six years, the Company will be required to enter into a new agreement with the landlord for the remaining term. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company was notified that the replacement tenant was placed in default by the landlord. As a result, the Company may be required to resume lease payments in respect of this property as soon as the third quarter of fiscal 2008, which payments will total $0.2 million in the aggregate per fiscal quarter through September 1, 2014. In the event that the Company becomes required to make these lease payments, it expects to sublease the property for the duration of the lease term in order to recover some or all of the amounts paid in respect of the lease. The Company may, however, be unable to find a sub-lessee for part or all of the remaining lease term. At September 30, 2007, the Company maintained a contingent lease liability of $0.2 million related to this property.

13

Table of Contents

First Thirty-Nine Weeks of Fiscal 2007 Compared to First Thirty-Nine Weeks of Fiscal 2006

Restaurant Sales. Restaurant sales increased $44.5 million, or 25.5%, to $218.8 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $174.3 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. The increase was due to $16.8 million in incremental sales from new company-owned restaurants that opened in 2006 and in the first thirty-nine weeks of 2007, $26.2 million contributed by previously franchised restaurants acquired during 2006 and 2007 and $1.5 million in sales from comparable restaurants open throughout both periods representing comparable restaurant sales growth of 0.9%. The growth consisted of an average check increase of 4.0% driven by non-entree increases in bar and lounge traffic, menu selection shifts, and year over year pricing of approximately 2.2% and was partially offset by an entree reduction of 3.1%.

Franchise Income. Franchise income increased $0.3 million, or 3.4%, to $9.0 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $8.7 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. Franchise income grew during the period as a result of a 0.7% increase in sales from franchisee-owned restaurants open throughout both periods, as well as the impact of seven new franchisee-owned restaurants that opened during fiscal 2006 and five new franchisee-owned restaurants that opened during the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007. This growth was partially offset by the reduced franchise restaurant base due to the Company’s acquisition of seven franchisee-owned restaurants in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2006 and three franchisee-owned restaurants in the third quarter of fiscal 2007.

Other Operating Income. Other operating income increased $1.9 million to $2.3 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $0.4 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. This increase was due primarily to $1.9 million of net gift card breakage during the first thirty-nine weeks versus a net gift card breakage loss of $39,000 during the prior year period. The Company recognizes gift card breakage for the remaining value of those cards that have not been redeemed within 18 months following the last date of card activity and when no third-party claim exists.

Food and Beverage Costs. Food and beverage costs increased $14.3 million, or 25.5%, to $70.3 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $56.0 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. As a percentage of restaurant sales, food and beverage costs remained unchanged at 32.1%. Increases in produce and dairy costs were fully offset by various sales mix initiatives, slightly favorable beef costs, and modest price increases.

Restaurant Operating Expenses. Restaurant operating expenses increased $23.5 million, or 29.9%, to $102.2 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $78.7 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. Restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of restaurant sales, increased to 46.7% in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from 45.1% in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. This increase in restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales was due to higher management education costs, higher health care costs, and higher occupancy expenses at newer restaurants. Additionally, due to the opening of four new restaurants in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 and the preparation for restaurant openings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, some labor and operating expense inefficiencies were incurred. There was only one new restaurant opening in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006.

Marketing and Advertising. Marketing and advertising expenses increased $0.7 million, or 12.7%, to $6.2 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $5.5 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. As a percentage of total revenues, marketing and advertising decreased by 0.3% to 2.7% in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from 3.0% in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. This percentage decrease was primarily due to the reduced utilization of television and local radio in select markets in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 versus the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006 and the timing of expenditures as the fiscal 2007 marketing plan is more evenly distributed throughout the fiscal year.

General and Administrative. General and administrative costs increased $1.7 million, or 10.6%, to $17.8 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $16.1 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. This increase resulted from increased franchise support and development costs as well as increased stock option compensation expense under FAS123R. These increases were partially offset by reduced levels of incentive compensation earned and certain open positions during the period. General and administrative costs as a percentage of total revenues, decreased by 1.0% to 7.8% in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from 8.8% in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006 as a result of increased sales volume.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.5 million, or 39.7%, to $8.8 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $6.3 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. The increase was due primarily to the addition of new company-owned restaurants and acquired restaurants during 2006 through the third quarter of 2007 as well as investments at the Company’s existing company-owned restaurants and corporate headquarters.

14

Table of Contents

Pre-opening Costs. Pre-opening costs increased $2.4 million, or 266.7%, to $3.3 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $0.9 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. This increase is due to the new restaurant openings that occurred during the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 which included Lake Mary and Naples, Florida, Anaheim, California and Biloxi, Mississippi as well as the new restaurant openings that will occur in the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. There was only one new Company-owned restaurant opening in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006.

Hurricane and Relocation Costs, net of Insurance Proceeds. During the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007, the Company recognized income of $3.7 million from insurance proceeds related to the Company’s business interruption losses and property losses in New Orleans and Metairie, Louisiana and Biloxi, Mississippi as a result of Hurricane Katrina. Costs related to the hurricane in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 were $0.2 million. During the first quarter of 2007, the Company finalized its claim and does not expect any significant expenses or proceeds related to the Hurricane Katrina in the future.

Loss on the disposal of property and equipment, net. During the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007, in an effort to improve the suitability for lease of our former home office building in Metairie, Louisiana, the first level was returned to its original parking use from an enclosed office space. As a result, the company disposed of all improvements and assets related to this first level of the building totaling $645,000. Additionally, the Company elected to donate the New Orleans restaurant property to a non-profit organization and recorded a donation of $512,000.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $2.0 million, or 117.6%, to $3.7 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $1.7 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. This increase was primarily due to the additional borrowings related to the 2006 and 2007 acquired restaurants as well as higher interest rates on those borrowings.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased $0.8 million, or 13.6%, to $6.7 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $5.9 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily due to an increase in income before income tax and an increase in the estimated annual effective tax rate to 32.3% from 30.8%.

Income from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing operations increased $0.8 million, or 6.1%, to $14.0 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $13.2 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006.

Discontinued Operations, net of Income Tax Benefit. Discontinued operations expense decreased $54,000 to $17,000 in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 from $71,000 in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. This expense relates to former operations in Cleveland, Ohio and Manhattan, NY. On June 25, 2006 the Company closed its Cleveland, Ohio restaurant whose lease term ended in September 2006. The Company determined that the closed restaurant should be accounted for as discontinued operations because the Company does not expect any further direct or indirect cash inflows from the discontinued restaurant as the restaurant has completely ceased operation. During August 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with the Manhattan-UN, New York landlord whereby: (1) the Company made a one-time payment of $0.3 million to the landlord for rent, commission on replacement lease, and attorneys fees; (2) the existing lease was terminated; (3) the Company allowed the landlord to contract with a third party replacement tenant; and (4) the Company and the landlord adjusted the remaining contingent lease term from eleven years to six years. Under the agreement, after the third anniversary, if the replacement tenant defaults on the new lease anytime during the remaining six years, the Company will be required to enter into a new agreement with the landlord for the remaining term. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company was notified that the replacement tenant was placed in default by the landlord. As a result, the Company may be required to resume lease payments in respect of this property as soon as the third quarter of fiscal 2008, which payments will total $0.2 million in the aggregate per fiscal quarter through September 1, 2014. In the event that the Company becomes required to make these lease payments, it expects to sublease the property for the duration of the lease term in order to recover some or all of the amounts paid in respect of the lease. The Company may, however, be unable to find a sub-lessee for part or all of the remaining lease term. At September 30, 2007, the Company maintained a contingent lease liability of $0.2 million related to this property.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities:

15

Table of Contents

The Company’s principal sources of cash during the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 were cash provided by operations and proceeds of long-term financing. Principal uses of cash during the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 included capital expenditures related to existing and in-process restaurants and the acquisition of three previously franchisee-owned restaurants. The Company expects that its principal uses of cash in the future will be to finance capital expenditures and to service debt.

The Company’s operations have not required significant working capital and, like many restaurant companies, it has been able to operate with negative working capital. Restaurant sales are primarily for cash or by credit card and restaurant operations do not require significant inventories or receivables. In addition, the Company receives trade credit for the purchase of food, beverage, and supplies, thereby reducing the need for incremental working capital to support growth.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $14.3 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007, compared to cash provided of $15.7 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to a decrease in accounts payable and deferred revenues, partially offset by an increase in net income.

Net cash used in investing activities was $45.0 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007, compared to $48.8 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. The decrease resulted primarily from the acquisition of five previously franchisee-owned restaurants in the first thirty-nine weeks of 2006 versus three in the first thirty-nine weeks of 2007.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $27.4 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007, compared to $26.1 million used in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. This increase was due to $32.3 million of additional borrowings for the aforementioned capital expenditures associated with new restaurant construction and the purchase of the three previously franchisee-owned restaurants, of which $5.0 million was repaid in the second quarter of fiscal 2007.

Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, totaled $31.3 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007, compared to $16.4 million in the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily due to expenditures associated with new restaurant construction. During the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007 the Company opened four new restaurants in Lake Mary and Naples, Florida, Anaheim, California and Biloxi, Mississippi.

The Company anticipates capital expenditures in the future will increase to the extent it opens additional company-owned restaurants and opportunistically acquires franchise-owned restaurants and related rights. See Note (9) in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Statements regarding the completed franchise acquisition. The Company currently expects to open seven company-owned restaurants in 2007 and expects its capital expenditures to be approximately $58.0 million to $63.0 million, substantially all of which will relate to planned restaurant openings, maintenance capital, and acquisitions of franchisee-owned restaurants. These capital expenditures will primarily be funded by cash flows from operations and, if necessary, by the use of the Company’s revolving credit facility, depending upon timing of expenditures.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2007, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by the SEC in Section 13(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses during the periods presented. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 includes a summary of the critical accounting policies the Company believes are the most important to aid in understanding its financial results. There have been no material changes to these critical accounting policies that impacted the Company’s reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses during the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2007.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements For Future Application

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurement. (“SFAS 157”) clarifies the definition of fair value, describes methods used to appropriately measure fair value, and expands fair value disclosure requirements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that currently require or permit fair value measurements and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 157 will have on the consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet, statements of income or cash flows.

16

Table of Contents

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. The provisions of SFAS 159 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 159 will have on the consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet, statements of income or cash flows.

Other accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates. For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes affect the fair market value of such debt but do not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely for variable rate debt, including borrowings under the Company’s senior credit facilities, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value of such debt, but do impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. At September 30, 2007, the Company had $95.3 million of variable rate debt of which $75.0 million has been converted to fixed rates through the use of an interest rate swap. Holding other variables constant (such as foreign exchange rates and debt levels), a hypothetical immediate one percentage point change in interest rates would be expected to have an impact on pre-tax earnings and cash flows for fiscal 2007 of approximately $0.2 million.

The Company has an interest rate swap to manage its exposure on its debt facility. By using the interest rate swap to manage exposures to changes in interest rates, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the interest rate swap. When the fair value of an interest rate swap is positive, the counterparty owes the Company, which creates credit risk for the Company. When the fair value of an interest rate swap is negative, the Company owes the counterparty and, therefore, it does not possess credit risk.

Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.

Foreign Currency Risk

In accordance with the Company’s franchise agreements relating to the Company’s international locations, it receives royalties from those franchisees in U.S. dollars, and therefore it believes that fluctuations in foreign exchange rates do not present a material risk to its operations.

Commodity Price Risk

The Company is exposed to market price fluctuations in beef and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of beef and other food product prices, this exposure can impact its food and beverage costs. Because the Company’s restaurants typically set menu prices in advance of beef and other food product purchases, the Company cannot quickly take into account changing costs of beef and other food items. To the extent that it is unable to pass the increased costs on to its guests through price increases, the Company’s results of operations would be adversely affected. The Company currently does not use financial instruments to hedge its risk to market price fluctuations in beef or other food product prices.

Effects of Inflation

Components of the Company’s operations subject to inflation include food, beverage, lease and labor costs. The Company’s leases require it to pay taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance and utilities, all of which are subject to inflationary increases. The Company believes inflation has not had a material impact on its results of operations in recent years.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

17

Table of Contents

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

There was no change in the Company’s “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report on Form 10-Q that in our judgment has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

From time to time the Company is involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. While litigation is subject to uncertainties and the outcome of litigated matters is not predictable with assurance, the Company is not aware of any legal proceedings pending or threatened against it that it expects to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

There are no material changes to the Risk Factors included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The impact of the circumstances and events described in such Risk Factors could result in significant adverse effects on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

None.

None.

None.

None.

18

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

November 6, 2007

19