SANDY SPRING BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2010
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
transition period from to
____________
Commission
File Number: 0-19065
SANDY SPRING BANCORP,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
|
52-1532952
|
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification
Number)
|
17801 Georgia Avenue, Olney,
Maryland
|
20832
|
|
(Address
of principal executive office)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
301-774-6400
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the
past 90 days.
Yes x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes ¨ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller
reporting company ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes ¨ No
x
The
number of outstanding shares of common stock outstanding as of November 3,
2010.
Common
stock, $1.00 par value – 24,011,029 shares
SANDY
SPRING BANCORP, INC.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Condition - Unaudited at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009
|
2
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss) - Unaudited for the Three Month
and Nine Months Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
3
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Unaudited for the Nine Month
Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
4
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity – Unaudited for
the Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
5
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
24
|
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
44
|
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
44
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
|
44
|
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
44
|
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
44
|
ITEM
4. [RESERVED]
|
44
|
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
|
44
|
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
|
44
|
SIGNATURES
|
45
|
2
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Quarterly Report Form 10-Q, as well as other periodic reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and written or oral communications made from
time to time by or on behalf of Sandy Spring Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”), may contain statements relating to future events or future results
of the Company that are considered “forward-looking statements” under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements may be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,”
“anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “intend” and “potential,” or words
of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as “should,” “could,” or
“may.” Forward-looking statements include statements of our
goals, intentions and expectations; statements regarding our business plans,
prospects, growth and operating strategies; statements regarding the quality of
our loan and investment portfolios; and estimates of our risks and future costs
and benefits.
Forward-looking
statements reflect our expectation or prediction of future conditions, events or
results based on information currently available. These forward-looking
statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that may cause
actual results to differ materially from those in such
statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not
limited to, the risks identified in Item 1A of the Annual Report Form 10-K filed
on March 12, 2010 and the following:
|
·
|
general
business and economic conditions nationally or in the markets we serve
could adversely affect, among other things, real estate prices,
unemployment levels, and consumer and business confidence, which could
lead to decreases in the demand for loans, deposits and other financial
services that we provide and increases in loan delinquencies and
defaults;
|
|
·
|
changes
or volatility in the capital markets and interest rates may adversely
impact the value of securities, loans, deposits and other financial
instruments and the interest rate sensitivity of our balance sheet as well
as our liquidity;
|
|
·
|
our
liquidity requirements could be adversely affected by changes in our
assets and liabilities;
|
|
·
|
our
investment securities portfolio is subject to credit risk, market risk,
and liquidity risk as well as changes in the estimates we use to value
certain of the securities in our
portfolio;
|
|
·
|
the
effect of legislative or regulatory developments including changes in laws
concerning taxes, banking, securities, insurance and other aspects of the
financial services industry;
|
|
·
|
competitive
factors among financial services companies, including product and pricing
pressures and our ability to attract, develop and retain qualified banking
professionals;
|
|
·
|
the
effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and other
regulatory agencies; and
|
|
·
|
the
effect of fiscal and governmental policies of the United States federal
government.
|
Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date of this report. We do not
undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or
events that occur after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events except as required by federal securities
laws.
1
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SANDY
SPRING BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION - UNAUDITED
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 40,511 | $ | 49,430 | ||||
Federal
funds sold
|
1,522 | 1,863 | ||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits with banks
|
37,692 | 8,503 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
79,725 | 59,796 | ||||||
Residential
mortgage loans held for sale (at fair value)
|
19,234 | 12,498 | ||||||
Investments
available-for-sale (at fair value)
|
960,313 | 858,433 | ||||||
Investments
held-to-maturity — fair value of $111,298 and $137,787 at September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
106,553 | 132,593 | ||||||
Other
equity securities
|
32,652 | 32,773 | ||||||
Total
loans and leases
|
2,185,207 | 2,298,010 | ||||||
Less:
allowance for loan and lease losses
|
(67,282 | ) | (64,559 | ) | ||||
Net
loans and leases
|
2,117,925 | 2,233,451 | ||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
48,175 | 49,606 | ||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
10,011 | 7,464 | ||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
13,083 | 13,653 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
76,816 | 76,816 | ||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
7,050 | 8,537 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
135,080 | 144,858 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 3,606,617 | $ | 3,630,478 | ||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
deposits
|
$ | 580,309 | $ | 540,578 | ||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
2,005,187 | 2,156,264 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
2,585,496 | 2,696,842 | ||||||
Securites
sold under retail repurchase agreements and federal funds
purchased
|
97,884 | 89,062 | ||||||
Advances
from FHLB
|
409,263 | 411,584 | ||||||
Subordinated
debentures
|
35,000 | 35,000 | ||||||
Accrued
interest payable and other liabilities
|
27,257 | 24,404 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
3,154,900 | 3,256,892 | ||||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock—par value $1.00 (liquidation preference of $1,000 per share)
shares authorized 83,094, shares issued and outstanding 41,547 and
83,094, net of discount of $1,239 and $2,999 at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
40,308 | 80,095 | ||||||
Common
stock — par value $1.00; shares authorized 49,916,906; shares
issued and outstanding 24,006,748 and 16,487,852 at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
24,007 | 16,488 | ||||||
Warrants
|
3,699 | 3,699 | ||||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
176,582 | 87,334 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
198,737 | 188,622 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
8,384 | (2,652 | ) | |||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
451,717 | 373,586 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 3,606,617 | $ | 3,630,478 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
2
SANDY
SPRING BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME/(LOSS) - UNAUDITED
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share
data)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Interest
Income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans and leases
|
$ | 29,084 | $ | 31,280 | $ | 87,742 | $ | 96,579 | ||||||||
Interest
on loans held for sale
|
148 | 121 | 321 | 654 | ||||||||||||
Interest
on deposits with banks
|
61 | 23 | 158 | 112 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividends on securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Taxable
|
6,336 | 5,947 | 18,640 | 13,673 | ||||||||||||
Exempt
from federal income taxes
|
1,737 | 1,814 | 5,372 | 5,560 | ||||||||||||
Interest
on federal funds sold
|
1 | - | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
37,367 | 39,185 | 112,235 | 116,581 | ||||||||||||
Interest
Expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on deposits
|
3,883 | 8,743 | 13,741 | 28,118 | ||||||||||||
Interest
on retail repurchase agreements and federal funds
purchased
|
61 | 87 | 198 | 225 | ||||||||||||
Interest
on advances from FHLB
|
3,676 | 3,706 | 10,949 | 11,005 | ||||||||||||
Interest
on subordinated debt
|
248 | 247 | 693 | 1,358 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
7,868 | 12,783 | 25,581 | 40,706 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
29,499 | 26,402 | 86,654 | 75,875 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
2,453 | 34,450 | 23,585 | 55,678 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest income (loss) after provision for loan and lease
losses
|
27,046 | (8,048 | ) | 63,069 | 20,197 | |||||||||||
Non-interest
Income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities gains
|
25 | 15 | 323 | 207 | ||||||||||||
Total
other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") losses
|
(334 | ) | - | (1,168 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Portion
of OTTI losses recognized in other comprehensive income, before
taxes
|
(46 | ) | - | 699 | - | |||||||||||
Net
OTTI recognized in earnings
|
(380 | ) | - | (469 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
2,567 | 2,823 | 7,984 | 8,537 | ||||||||||||
Gains
on sales of mortgage loans
|
915 | 1,011 | 2,544 | 2,819 | ||||||||||||
Fees
on sales of investment products
|
782 | 740 | 2,464 | 2,062 | ||||||||||||
Trust
and investment management fees
|
2,505 | 2,406 | 7,488 | 7,063 | ||||||||||||
Insurance
agency commissions
|
978 | 1,048 | 3,895 | 4,138 | ||||||||||||
Income
from bank owned life insurance
|
709 | 740 | 2,105 | 2,176 | ||||||||||||
Visa
check fees
|
843 | 758 | 2,438 | 2,144 | ||||||||||||
Other
income
|
1,794 | 1,121 | 5,175 | 4,520 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
10,738 | 10,662 | 33,947 | 33,666 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
13,841 | 14,411 | 41,393 | 41,319 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy
expense of premises
|
2,826 | 2,685 | 8,625 | 8,008 | ||||||||||||
Equipment
expenses
|
1,137 | 1,444 | 3,655 | 4,332 | ||||||||||||
Marketing
|
589 | 484 | 1,678 | 1,389 | ||||||||||||
Outside
data services
|
966 | 987 | 3,007 | 2,754 | ||||||||||||
FDIC
insurance
|
1,056 | 1,219 | 3,383 | 4,968 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
495 | 1,048 | 1,487 | 3,150 | ||||||||||||
Other
expenses
|
4,429 | 4,289 | 13,370 | 11,755 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest expenses
|
25,339 | 26,567 | 76,598 | 77,675 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
12,445 | (23,953 | ) | 20,418 | (23,812 | ) | ||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
3,961 | (10,379 | ) | 5,174 | (12,175 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 8,484 | $ | (13,574 | ) | $ | 15,244 | $ | (11,637 | ) | ||||||
Preferred
stock dividends and discount accretion
|
2,074 | 1,205 | 4,477 | 3,607 | ||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
$ | 6,410 | $ | (14,779 | ) | $ | 10,767 | $ | (15,244 | ) | ||||||
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share Amounts:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
net income (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.35 | $ | (0.83 | ) | $ | 0.70 | $ | (0.71 | ) | ||||||
Basic
net income (loss) per common share
|
0.27 | (0.90 | ) | 0.49 | (0.93 | ) | ||||||||||
Diluted
net income (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.35 | $ | (0.83 | ) | $ | 0.70 | $ | (0.71 | ) | ||||||
Diluted
net income (loss) per common share
|
0.27 | (0.90 | ) | 0.49 | (0.93 | ) | ||||||||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$ | 0.01 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.36 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
3
SANDY
SPRING BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 15,244 | $ | (11,637 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,816 | 7,849 | ||||||
Net
OTTI recognized in earnings
|
469 | - | ||||||
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
23,585 | 55,678 | ||||||
Share
based compensation expense
|
791 | 1,105 | ||||||
Deferred
income tax benefit
|
(1,911 | ) | (5,868 | ) | ||||
Origination
of loans held for sale
|
(161,814 | ) | (285,116 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales of mortgage loans held for sale
|
157,182 | 288,253 | ||||||
Gains
on sales of mortgage loans held for sale
|
(2,104 | ) | (2,672 | ) | ||||
Securities
gains
|
(323 | ) | (207 | ) | ||||
Gains
on sales of premises and equipment
|
(92 | ) | - | |||||
Net
decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
570 | (1,515 | ) | |||||
Net
decrease (increase) in other assets
|
3,162 | (13,083 | ) | |||||
Net
increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
3,114 | 3,278 | ||||||
Other
– net
|
4,495 | 2,675 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
48,184 | 38,740 | ||||||
Investing
activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of other equity securities
|
121 | (3,628 | ) | |||||
Purchases
of investments available-for-sale
|
(600,295 | ) | (719,202 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from maturities, calls and principal payments of investments
held-to-maturity
|
26,282 | 31,229 | ||||||
Proceeds
from maturities, calls and principal payments of investments
available-for-sale
|
512,503 | 213,407 | ||||||
Net
decrease in loans and leases
|
83,641 | 108,208 | ||||||
Proceeds
from the sales of other real estate owned
|
5,294 | 788 | ||||||
Contingent
consideration payout
|
- | (2,308 | ) | |||||
Expenditures
for premises and equipment
|
(1,757 | ) | (2,200 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided (used) in investing activities
|
25,789 | (373,706 | ) | |||||
Financing
activities:
|
||||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in deposits
|
(111,346 | ) | 318,230 | |||||
Net
increase in retail repurchase agreements and federal funds
purchased
|
8,822 | 9,032 | ||||||
Repayment
of advances from FHLB
|
(2,321 | ) | (725 | ) | ||||
Common
stock issued pursuant to West Financial Services
acquisition
|
- | 628 | ||||||
Redemption
of preferred stock
|
(41,547 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
95,961 | 424 | ||||||
Tax
benefits associated with shared based compensation
|
15 | - | ||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(3,628 | ) | (8,842 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
(54,044 | ) | 318,747 | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
19,929 | (16,219 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
59,796 | 105,229 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 79,725 | $ | 89,010 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosures:
|
||||||||
Interest
payments
|
$ | 25,931 | $ | 41,378 | ||||
Income
tax payments
|
181 | 3,920 | ||||||
Transfers
from loans to other real estate owned
|
8,300 | 4,889 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
4
SANDY
SPRING BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY -
UNAUDITED
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
|
Common
|
Paid-In
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders’
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Warrants
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income (Loss)
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balances
at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 80,095 | $ | 16,488 | $ | 3,699 | $ | 87,334 | $ | 188,622 | $ | (2,652 | ) | $ | 373,586 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | - | 15,244 | - | 15,244 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized gain on debt securities, net of reclassification
adjustment
|
- | - | - | - | - | 10,527 | 10,527 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in funded status of defined benefit pension
|
- | - | - | - | - | 509 | 509 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
26,280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption
of preferred stock - 41,547 shares
|
(41,547 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (41,547 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock dividends - $0.03 per share
|
- | - | - | - | (652 | ) | - | (652 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends - $37.50 per share
|
- | - | - | - | (2,717 | ) | - | (2,717 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
- | - | - | 791 | - | - | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discount
accretion
|
1,760 | - | - | - | (1,760 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued pursuant to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issuance - 7,475,000 shares
|
- | 7,475 | - | 88,159 | - | - | 95,634 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option plan - 2,216 shares
|
- | 2 | - | 30 | - | - | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Employee
stock purchase plan - 25,519 shares
|
- | 26 | - | 276 | - | - | 302 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
stock - 12,247 shares
|
- | 12 | - | (79 | ) | - | - | (67 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Director
stock purchase plan - 3,709 shares
|
- | 4 | - | 68 | - | - | 72 | |||||||||||||||||||||
DRIP
plan - 205 shares
|
- | - | - | 3 | - | - | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances
at September 30, 2010
|
$ | 40,308 | $ | 24,007 | $ | 3,699 | $ | 176,582 | $ | 198,737 | $ | 8,384 | $ | 451,717 | ||||||||||||||
Balances
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 79,440 | $ | 16,399 | $ | 3,699 | $ | 85,486 | $ | 214,410 | $ | (7,572 | ) | $ | 391,862 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | - | (11,637 | ) | - | (11,637 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized gain on debt securities, net of reclassification
adjustment
|
- | - | - | - | - | 6,649 | 6,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in funded status of defined benefit pension
|
- | - | - | - | - | 613 | 613 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
(4,375 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock dividends - $0.36 per share
|
- | - | - | - | (5,957 | ) | - | (5,957 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends - $37.49 per share
|
- | - | - | - | (3,116 | ) | - | (3,116 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
- | - | - | 1,105 | - | - | 1,105 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discount
accretion
|
490 | - | - | - | (490 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued pursuant to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contingent
consideration relating to 2005 acquisition of West Financial - 31,663
shares
|
- | 32 | - | 596 | - | - | 628 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Employee
stock purchase plan - 28,909 shares
|
- | 29 | - | 324 | - | - | 353 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Director
stock purchase plan - 2,988 shares
|
- | 3 | - | 37 | - | - | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
stock - 5,608 shares
|
- | 5 | - | (6 | ) | - | - | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
DRIP
plan – 2,441 shares
|
- | 2 | - | 30 | - | - | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances
at September 30, 2009
|
$ | 79,930 | $ | 16,470 | $ | 3,699 | $ | 87,572 | $ | 193,210 | $ | (310 | ) | $ | 380,571 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
5
SANDY
SPRING BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Sandy
Spring Bancorp (“the Company”), a Maryland corporation, is the bank holding
company for Sandy Spring Bank (“the Bank”), which conducts a full-service
commercial banking, mortgage banking and trust business. Services to individuals
and businesses include accepting deposits, extending real estate, consumer and
commercial loans and lines of credit, equipment leasing, general insurance,
personal trust, and investment and wealth management services. The Company
operates in the six Maryland counties of Anne Arundel, Carroll, Frederick,
Howard, Montgomery, and Prince George's, and in Fairfax and Loudoun counties in
Virginia. The Company offers investment and wealth management services through
the Bank’s subsidiary, West Financial Services. Insurance products are available
to clients through Chesapeake Insurance Group, and Neff & Associates, which
are agencies of Sandy Spring Insurance Corporation. The Equipment Leasing
Company provides leasing primarily for technology-based equipment to retail
businesses.
The
accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and
prevailing practices within the financial services industry for interim
financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and notes required for complete financial
statements and prevailing practices within the banking industry. The following
summary of significant accounting policies of the Company is presented to assist
the reader in understanding the financial and other data presented in this
report. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future
periods or for the year ending December 31, 2010. These statements should be
read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes
included in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 12, 2010. There have been no
significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies as disclosed in the
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis
of Presentation
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sandy Spring Bank and its
subsidiaries, Sandy Spring Insurance Corporation, The Equipment Leasing Company,
and West Financial Services, Inc. Consolidation has resulted in the elimination
of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (comprising only normal recurring accruals)
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods have
been included. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of
the issuance of its financial statements.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates that could
change significantly relate to the provision for loan and lease losses and the
related allowance, potential impairment of goodwill or intangibles, estimates
with respect to other-than-temporary impairment involving investment securities,
non-accrual loans, other real estate owned, prepayment rates, share-based
payment, litigation, income taxes and projections of pension expense and the
related liability.
Cash
Flows
For
purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due
from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks (items
with an original maturity of three months or less).
Adopted
Accounting Pronouncements
The
Company applies the guidance for the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Accounting Standards Topic (“ASC”) regarding disclosure requirements
that apply to transfers that occur both before and after November 15, 2009. This
guidance changes the de-recognition guidance for transferors of financial
assets, including entities that sponsor securitizations. In addition existing
qualifying special-purpose entities (“QSPE”) must be evaluated for consolidation
by the reporting entity. The concept of QSPE is eliminated and transferors are
required to evaluate transfers to such entities. The guidance also introduces
the concept of a participating interest. A participating interest is defined as
a proportionate ownership interest in a financial asset in which the cash flows
from the asset are allocated to the participating interest holders in proportion
to their ownership share.
6
Additionally,
the guidance significantly modifies the conditions required for a transfer of a
financial asset or a participating interest therein to qualify as a sale. The
guidance also changes the measurement guidance for transfers of financial assets
in that it requires that a transferor recognize and initially measure at fair
value any servicing assets, servicing liabilities, and any other assets obtained
and liabilities incurred in a sale. The statement amends the disclosure
requirements to allow financial statement users to understand the nature and
extent of the transferor’s continuing involvement with financial assets that
have been transferred. The application of this
guidance did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
The
Company applies the guidance for identifying the primary beneficiary of a VIE
(“variable interest entity”) and applies the required analytical approach to
determine if an enterprise’s variable interests give it a controlling financial
interest in the VIE. The guidance expanded the disclosure requirements for an
enterprise that has a variable interest in a VIE. The application of this
guidance did not have a material impact on the financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company.
Pending
Accounting Pronouncements
In July
2010, the FASB issued guidance regarding disclosures about the credit quality of
financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. This guidance is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December
15, 2010. For disclosures about activity during a reporting period, those
disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on
or after December 15, 2011. The purpose of the guidance is to enhance
disclosures required on financing receivables and the allowance for credit
losses. The disclosures will provide enhanced information on the credit quality
of a creditor’s financing receivables and the adequacy of its allowance for
credit losses. This information is required to be presented on a disaggregated
basis and includes the aging of the receivables, the nature and extent of any
troubled debt restructurings and the effect on the allowance for credit losses.
This guidance also requires disclosures of any significant purchases or sales of
receivables. The application of this guidance is not expected to have any
material impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows
of the Company, but will increase the Company’s disclosures related to loans and
the allowance for loan and lease losses.
NOTE 2
– INVESTMENTS
At
September 30, 2010, unrealized losses associated with U.S. Government Agencies
have been caused by changes in interest rates and are not considered credit
related as the contractual cash flows of these investments are either explicitly
or implicitly backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The
municipal securities portfolio segment is not experiencing any significant
credit problems at September 30, 2010 and the Company believes it will receive
all contractual cash flows due on this portfolio. The mortgage-backed securities
portfolio at September 30, 2010 is composed entirely of either the most senior
tranches of GNMA collateralized mortgage obligations ($229.2 million), or GNMA,
FNMA or FHLMC mortgage-backed securities ($341.7 million). The Company does not
intend to sell these securities and has sufficient liquidity to hold these
securities for an adequate period of time, which may be maturity, to allow for
any anticipated recovery in fair value. The non-credit related unrealized losses
in the available-for-sale portfolio are considered temporary in nature.
Unrealized losses that are related to the prevailing interest rate environment
will decline over time and recover as these securities approach
maturity
At
September 30, 2010, the Company owned a total of $3.0 million in securities
backed by single issuer trust preferred securities issued by banks. The fair
value of these securities was $3.4 million as determined using broker
quotations. The Company also owns pooled trust preferred securities, which total
$3.8 million, with a fair value of $3.1 million. These pooled securities are
backed by the trust preferred securities issued by banks, thrifts, and insurance
companies. These particular securities have exhibited limited trading activity
due to the state of the economy. There are currently very few market
participants who are willing and or able to transact for these securities. Given
current conditions in the debt markets and the absence of observable
transactions in the secondary markets, the Company has determined:
·
|
The
few observable transactions and market quotations that are available are
not reliable for purposes of determining fair
value.
|
·
|
The
pooled trust preferred securities will be classified within Level 3 of the
fair value hierarchy and the fair value is determined based upon
independent modeling.
|
·
|
An
income valuation approach technique (present value technique) that
maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of
unobservable inputs will be more representative of fair value than a
market approach valuation
technique.
|
The
assumptions used to determine fair value on a present value basis, in the
absence of observable trading prices as noted, included the
following:
·
|
Detailed
credit and structural evaluation for each piece of collateral in the
pooled trust preferred
securities.
|
·
|
Collateral
performance projections for each piece of collateral in the pooled trust
preferred securities (default, recovery and prepayment/amortization
probabilities).
|
·
|
Terms
of the structure of the pooled trust preferred securities as established
in the indenture.
|
·
|
An
11.1% discount rate that was developed by using the risk free rate
adjusted for a risk premium and a liquidity adjustment that considered the
characteristics of the securities and the related
collateral.
|
7
As part
of its formal quarterly evaluation of the pooled trust preferred securities for
the presence of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”), the Company utilized a
third party valuation service. The Company reviewed the methodology employed by
the third party valuation service for reasonableness by considering a number of
inputs and the appropriateness of the key underlying assumptions above. In
addition, the Company also reviewed and considered the following:
|
·
|
The
projected cash flows from the underlying securities that incorporate
default expectations and the severity of
losses;
|
|
·
|
The
underlying cause and conditions associated with defaults or deferrals and
an assessment of the relative strength of the
issuer;
|
|
·
|
The
receipt of payments on a timely basis and the ability of the issuer to
make scheduled interest or principal
payments;
|
|
·
|
The
length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than
the amortized cost;
|
|
·
|
Adverse
conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or geographic
area;
|
|
·
|
Historical
and implied volatility of the fair value of the
security;
|
|
·
|
Credit
risk concentrations;
|
|
·
|
Amount
of principal likely to be recovered by stated
maturity;
|
|
·
|
Ratings
changes of the security;
|
|
·
|
Performance
of bond collateral;
|
|
·
|
Recoveries
of additional declines in fair value subsequent to the date of the
statement of condition;
|
|
·
|
That
the securities are senior notes with first
priority;
|
|
·
|
Other
information currently available, such as the latest trustee reports;
and
|
|
·
|
An
analysis of the credit worthiness of the remaining individual pooled
banks.
|
As a
result of this evaluation, it was determined that the pooled trust preferred
securities issued by banks had credit-related OTTI of $219 thousand which was
recognized in earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The
credit-related OTTI recognized in earnings for the three months ended September
30, 2010 was $130 thousand. Non-credit related OTTI on these securities, which
are not expected to be sold and that the Company has the ability to hold until
maturity, was $699 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This
non-credit related OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) at
September 30, 2010. All payments have been received as contractually required on
these securities at September 30, 2010.
At
September 30, 2010, the Company held $350 thousand in marketable equity
securities of two entities. The quarterly review of the financial statements and
review of other recently available data determined that OTTI existed with
respect to one of the investments. As a result, the Company recognized in
earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 credit-related
OTTI of $250 thousand which represented the Company’s entire investment in the
particular institution.
Investments
available-for-sale
The
amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments available-for-sale for
the periods indicated are as follows:
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
government agencies
|
$ | 333,458 | $ | 5,635 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 339,092 | $ | 352,841 | $ | 3,190 | $ | (434 | ) | $ | 355,597 | ||||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
41,093 | 2,565 | - | 43,658 | 41,283 | 903 | (44 | ) | 42,142 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
|
554,928 | 16,066 | (75 | ) | 570,919 | 449,722 | 5,767 | (1,491 | ) | 453,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust
preferred
|
6,828 | 415 | (699 | ) | 6,544 | 7,841 | 180 | (1,675 | ) | 6,346 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
debt securities
|
936,307 | 24,681 | (775 | ) | 960,213 | 851,687 | 10,040 | (3,644 | ) | 858,083 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
100 | - | - | 100 | 350 | - | - | 350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
investments available-for-sale
|
$ | 936,407 | $ | 24,681 | $ | (775 | ) | $ | 960,313 | $ | 852,037 | $ | 10,040 | $ | (3,644 | ) | $ | 858,433 |
8
Gross
unrealized losses and fair value by length of time that the individual
available-for-sale securities have been in an unrealized loss position for the
periods indicated are as follows:
As of September 30, 2010
|
Continuous Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Losses Existing for:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
of
|
Less than
|
More than
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
securities
|
Fair Value
|
12 months
|
12 months
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||
U.S.
government agencies
|
1 | $ | 9,981 | $ | 1 | $ | - | $ | 1 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
|
7 | 50,405 | 74 | 1 | 75 | |||||||||||||||
Trust
preferred
|
2 | 3,353 | - | 699 | 699 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
10 | $ | 63,739 | $ | 75 | $ | 700 | $ | 775 |
As of December 31, 2009
|
Continuous Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Losses Existing for:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
of
|
Less than
|
More than
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
securities
|
Fair Value
|
12 months
|
12 months
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||
U.S.
government agencies
|
10 | $ | 72,793 | $ | 434 | $ | - | $ | 434 | |||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
5 | 5,805 | 40 | 4 | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
|
30 | 150,369 | 1,454 | 37 | 1,491 | |||||||||||||||
Trust
preferred
|
3 | 4,366 | 24 | 1,651 | 1,675 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
48 | $ | 233,333 | $ | 1,952 | $ | 1,692 | $ | 3,644 |
The
amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities
available-for-sale at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by contractual
maturity are shown in the following table. The Company has allocated
mortgage-backed securities into the four maturity groupings reflected in the
following table using the expected average life of the individual securities
based on statistics provided by independent third party industry sources.
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may
have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment
penalties.
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Estimated
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Fair
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Cost
|
Value
|
Cost
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 41,515 | $ | 41,852 | $ | 56,739 | $ | 57,454 | ||||||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
174,484 | 179,412 | 273,351 | 275,712 | ||||||||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
216,805 | 219,646 | 70,770 | 71,132 | ||||||||||||
Due
after ten years
|
503,503 | 519,303 | 450,827 | 453,785 | ||||||||||||
Total
debt securities available for sale
|
$ | 936,307 | $ | 960,213 | $ | 851,687 | $ | 858,083 |
At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, investments available-for-sale with a
book value of $233.2 million and $290.2 million, respectively, were pledged as
collateral for certain government deposits and for other purposes as required or
permitted by law. The outstanding balance of no single issuer, except for U.S.
Agency securities, exceeded ten percent of stockholders' equity at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
Investments
held-to-maturity
The
amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments held-to-maturity for the
periods indicated are as follows:
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
$ | 106,032 | $ | 4,699 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 110,727 | $ | 131,996 | $ | 5,156 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 137,151 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
|
521 | 50 | - | 571 | 597 | 39 | - | 636 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
investments held-to-maturity
|
$ | 106,553 | $ | 4,749 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 111,298 | $ | 132,593 | $ | 5,195 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 137,787 |
9
Gross
unrealized losses and fair value by length of time that the individual
held-to-maturity securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position
for the periods indicated are as follows:
As of September 30, 2010
|
Continuous Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Losses Existing for:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
of
|
Less than
|
More than
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
securities
|
Fair Value
|
12 months
|
12 months
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
2 | $ | 400 | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | |||||||||||
Total
|
2 | $ | 400 | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 |
As of December 31, 2009
|
Continuous Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Losses Existing for:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
of
|
Less than
|
More than
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
securities
|
Fair Value
|
12 months
|
12 months
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
4 | $ | 1,782 | $ | 1 | $ | - | $ | 1 | |||||||||||
Total
|
4 | $ | 1,782 | $ | 1 | $ | - | $ | 1 |
The
Company does not intend to sell these securities and has sufficient liquidity to
hold these securities for an adequate period of time, which may be maturity, to
allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value, substantiates that the
unrealized losses in the held-to-maturity portfolio are considered temporary in
nature.
The
amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities held to maturity at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by contractual maturity are shown
below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities as borrowers
may have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment
penalties.
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Estimated
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Fair
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Cost
|
Value
|
Cost
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 20,701 | $ | 21,108 | $ | 13,626 | $ | 13,800 | ||||||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
20,174 | 21,605 | 26,356 | 27,687 | ||||||||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
25,694 | 26,888 | 34,545 | 35,776 | ||||||||||||
Due
after ten years
|
39,984 | 41,697 | 58,066 | 60,524 | ||||||||||||
Total
debt securities held-to-maturity
|
$ | 106,553 | $ | 111,298 | $ | 132,593 | $ | 137,787 |
At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, investments held to maturity with a
book value of $90.3 million and $115.7 million, respectively, were pledged as
collateral for certain government deposits and for other purposes as required or
permitted by law. The outstanding balance of no single issuer, except for U.S.
Agency securities, exceeded ten percent of stockholders' equity at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
Equity
securities
Other
equity securities are composed primarily of FHLB stock and Federal Reserve Bank
stock, at cost. With respect to the FHLB stock, the Company has received the
most recent quarterly dividend that was due. Additionally, on June 30, 2010, the
FHLB announced that it will begin repurchasing excess stock on July 15, 2010.
The Company has determined through a comprehensive review that there have been
no other events that would result in a significant adverse effect on the fair
value of the FHLB stock and that the par value of this investment will
ultimately be recovered.
10
Other
equity securities for the periods indicated are as follows:
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank stock
|
$ | 7,530 | $ | 7,531 | ||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock
|
25,047 | 25,167 | ||||||
Atlantic
Central Bank stock
|
75 | 75 | ||||||
Total
equity securities
|
$ | 32,652 | $ | 32,773 |
NOTE
3 – LOANS AND LEASES
Major
categories for the periods indicated are presented below:
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Residential
real estate:
|
||||||||
Residential
mortgages
|
$ | 442,723 | $ | 457,414 | ||||
Residential
construction
|
92,485 | 92,283 | ||||||
Commercial
loans and leases:
|
||||||||
Commercial
mortgages
|
903,195 | 894,951 | ||||||
Commercial
construction
|
96,823 | 131,789 | ||||||
Commercial
business
|
240,671 | 296,220 | ||||||
Leases
|
17,895 | 25,704 | ||||||
Consumer
|
391,415 | 399,649 | ||||||
Total
loans and leases
|
$ | 2,185,207 | $ | 2,298,010 |
NOTE 4 – ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE
LOSSES
Activity
in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the periods indicated is
presented below:
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
(In thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$ | 64,559 | $ | 50,526 | ||||
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
23,585 | 55,678 | ||||||
Loan
and lease charge-offs
|
(23,969 | ) | (43,871 | ) | ||||
Loan
and lease recoveries
|
3,107 | 604 | ||||||
Net
charge-offs
|
(20,862 | ) | (43,267 | ) | ||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$ | 67,282 | $ | 62,937 |
11
Information
regarding the composition of impaired loans and the associated specific reserves
for the periods indicated is as follows:
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Impaired
loans with specific reserves
|
||||||||
Commercial
mortgage
|
$ | 20,091 | $ | 8,693 | ||||
Commercial
construction
|
13,490 | 7,571 | ||||||
Commercial
business
|
9,033 | 7,419 | ||||||
Total
impaired loans with specific reserves
|
42,614 | 23,683 | ||||||
Impaired
loans without specific reserves
|
||||||||
Commercial
mortgage
|
2,709 | 12,166 | ||||||
Commercial
construction
|
27,268 | 58,720 | ||||||
Commercial
business
|
1,714 | 4,883 | ||||||
Total
impaired loans without specific reserves
|
31,691 | 75,769 | ||||||
Total
impaired loans
|
$ | 74,305 | $ | 99,452 | ||||
Allowance
for loan and lease losses related to impaired loans
|
$ | 10,602 | $ | 6,613 | ||||
Allowance
for loan and lease losses related to other than impaired
loans
|
56,680 | 57,946 | ||||||
Total
allowance for loan and lease losses
|
$ | 67,282 | $ | 64,559 | ||||
Average
impaired loans for the year
|
$ | 84,673 | $ | 100,387 | ||||
Contractual
interest income due on loans in non-accrual status during the
year
|
$ | 4,434 | $ | 6,355 | ||||
Interest
income on impaired loans recognized on a cash basis
|
$ | - | $ | - |
NOTE
5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
On March
17, 2010, the Company completed an offering of 7,475,000 common shares at a
price of $13.50 per share, before the underwriting discount of $0.675 per share.
This resulted in proceeds of $95.6 million, net of the offering expenses. Each
share of the issued common stock has the same relative rights as, and is
identical in all respects with, each other share of common stock.
.
On July
21, 2010, the Company repaid the U.S. Treasury for half of the preferred stock
issued under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) which amounted to $41.5
million of the $83.0 million of preferred stock issued by the Company in
December 2008 as part of TARP. The repayment resulted in a reduction of the
associated preferred dividends and Tier 1 regulatory capital. As a result of the
repayment, the Company recognized $1.3 million in accelerated discount accretion
during the third quarter of 2010. This transaction had no effect on the
outstanding warrant to purchase common shares sold to the U.S. Treasury as part
of the original issuance of the preferred stock.
Management
intends to use the remainder of the net proceeds from the aforementioned sale of
common shares for general corporate purposes which may include financing
possible acquisitions of branches or other financial institutions or financial
service companies, extending credit to, or funding investments in, the Company’s
subsidiaries and repaying, reducing or refinancing indebtedness, which could
include repayment of the remaining preferred stock issued by the Company as part
of the TARP. The precise amounts and the timing of the use of the remaining net
proceeds will depend upon market conditions, the Company’s subsidiaries’ funding
requirements, the availability of other funds and other factors. Until the
remaining net proceeds from the sale of any of the Company’s securities are used
for general corporate purposes, the proceeds will be used to reduce the
Company’s indebtedness or for temporary investments
NOTE
6 – SHARE BASED COMPENSATION
At
September 30, 2010, the Company had two share based compensation plans in
existence, the 1999 Stock Option Plan (expired but having outstanding options
that may still be exercised) and the 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan, which is described
below.
The
Company’s 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan (“Omnibus Plan”) provides for the granting of
non-qualifying stock options to the Company’s directors, and incentive and
non-qualifying stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock
grants to selected key employees on a periodic basis at the discretion of the
Board. The Omnibus Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 1,800,000 shares of
common stock of which 1,107,225 are available for issuance at September 30,
2010, has a term of ten years, and is administered by a committee comprised of
at least three directors appointed by the Board of Directors. Options granted
under the plan have an exercise price which may not be less than 100% of the
fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant and must be
exercised within seven to ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price
of stock options must be paid for in full in cash or shares of common stock, or
a combination of both. The committee has the discretion to impose restrictions
on the shares to be purchased upon the exercise of such options. Options granted
under the expired 1999 Stock Option Plan remain outstanding until exercised or
they expire. The Company generally issues authorized but previously unissued
shares to satisfy option exercises.
12
During
2010, 37,389 stock options were granted, subject to a three year vesting
schedule with one third of the options vesting each year on the anniversary date
of the grant. Additionally, 104,281 shares of restricted stock were granted,
subject to either a five or three year vesting schedule with an equal portion of
the shares vesting each year on the grant date anniversary. Compensation expense
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the respective
stock option or restricted stock grant. The fair values of all of the options
granted have been estimated using a binomial option-pricing model.
Compensation
expense related to awards of stock options and restricted stock was $0.3 million
and $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The Company recognized compensation expense related to the awards
of stock options and restricted stock grants of $0.8 million and $1.1 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Stock
options exercised in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 had an immaterial
intrinsic value. No stock options were exercised for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The total of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock
options was approximately $0.4 million as of September 30, 2010. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a period of approximately 1.9 years. The total of
unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock was approximately
$2.5 million as of September 30, 2010. That cost is expected to be recognized
over a period of approximately 3.6 years.
A summary
of share option activity for the period indicated is reflected in the following
table:
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Weighted
|
Average
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||||
of
|
Average
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||||
Common
|
Exercise
|
Remaining
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data):
|
Shares
|
Share Price
|
Life(Years)
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2010
|
833,727 | $ | 32.56 | $ | 216 | |||||||||||
Granted
|
37,389 | $ | 15.00 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(2,216 | ) | $ | 14.54 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(71,283 | ) | $ | 35.25 | - | |||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2010
|
797,617 | $ | 31.54 | 3.2 | $ | 227 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2010
|
691,016 | $ | 33.71 | 2.9 | $ | 70 | ||||||||||
Weighted
average fair value of options granted during the year
|
$ | 6.65 |
A summary
of the activity for the Company’s non-vested options and restricted stock for
the period indicated is presented on the following tables:
Weighted
|
||||||||
Average
|
||||||||
Number
|
Grant-Date
|
|||||||
(In dollars, except share data):
|
of Shares
|
Fair Value
|
||||||
Non-vested
options at January 1, 2010
|
123,088 | $ | 3.88 | |||||
Granted
|
37,389 | $ | 6.65 | |||||
Vested
|
(50,163 | ) | $ | 4.04 | ||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(3,713 | ) | $ | 3.74 | ||||
Non-vested
options at September 30, 2010
|
106,601 | $ | 4.78 |
13
Weighted
|
||||||||
Average
|
||||||||
Number
|
Grant-Date
|
|||||||
(In dollars, except share data):
|
Of Shares
|
Fair Value
|
||||||
Restricted
stock at January 1, 2010
|
111,173 | $ | 16.64 | |||||
Granted
|
104,281 | $ | 15.00 | |||||
Vested
|
(25,736 | ) | $ | 14.85 | ||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(1,723 | ) | $ | (23.51 | ) | |||
Restricted
stock at September 30, 2010
|
187,995 | $ | 16.34 |
NOTE
7 – PENSION, PROFIT SHARING, AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Benefit Pension
Plan
The
Company has a qualified, noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan covering
substantially all employees. Benefits after January 1, 2005, are based on the
benefit earned as of December 31, 2004, plus benefits earned in future years of
service based on the employee’s compensation during each such year. All benefit
accruals for employees were frozen as of December 31, 2007 based on past service
and thus future salary increases will no longer affect the defined benefit
provided by the plan, although additional vesting may continue to
occur.
The
Company’s funding policy is to contribute amounts to the plan sufficient to meet
the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended. In addition, the Company contributes additional
amounts as it deems appropriate based on benefits attributed to service prior to
the date of the plan freeze. The Plan invests primarily in a diversified
portfolio of managed fixed income and equity funds. The Company has not yet
determined the amount of its 2010 contribution to the plan.
Net
periodic benefit cost for the periods indicated includes the following
components:
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Interest
cost on projected benefit obligation
|
$ | 401 | $ | 361 | $ | 1,083 | $ | 1,076 | ||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(326 | ) | (300 | ) | (876 | ) | (942 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized
net actuarial loss
|
317 | 342 | 846 | 1,020 | ||||||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 392 | $ | 403 | $ | 1,053 | $ | 1,154 |
Contributions
The
decision as to whether or not to make a plan contribution and the amount of any
such contribution is dependent on a number of factors. Such factors include the
investment performance of the plan assets in the current economy and, since the
plan is currently frozen, the remaining investment horizon of the plan. The
Company continues to monitor the funding level of the pension plan and may make
additional contributions as deemed necessary during 2010.
Plan
Assets
The
Company has a written investment policy approved by the board of directors that
governs the investment of the defined benefit pension fund trust portfolio. The
investment policy is designed to provide limits on risk that is undertaken by
the investment managers both in terms of market volatility of the portfolio and
the quality of the individual assets that are held in the portfolio. The
investment policy statement focuses on the following areas of concern:
preservation of capital, diversification, risk tolerance, investment duration,
rate of return, liquidity and investment management costs.
The
Company has constituted the Retirement Plans Investment Committee (“RPIC”) in
part to monitor the investments of the Plan as well as to recommend to executive
management changes in the Investment Policy Statement which governs the Plan’s
investment operations. These recommendations include asset allocation changes
based on a number of factors including the investment horizon for the Plan. The
Company’s Investment Management and Fiduciary Services Division is the
investment manager of the Plan and also serves as an advisor to RPIC on the
Plan’s investment matters.
Investment
strategies and asset allocations are based on careful consideration of plan
liabilities, the plan’s funded status and the Company’s financial condition.
Investment performance and asset allocation are measured and monitored on an
ongoing basis. The current target allocations for plan assets are 0-30% for
equity securities, 0-100% for fixed income securities and 0-100% for cash funds
and emerging market debt funds. This relatively conservative asset allocation
has been set after taking into consideration the Plan’s current frozen status
and the possibility of partial plan terminations over the intermediate
term.
14
Market
volatility risk is controlled by limiting the asset allocation of the most
volatile asset class, equities, to no more than 30% of the portfolio and by
ensuring that there is sufficient liquidity to meet distribution requirements
from the portfolio without disrupting long-term assets. Diversification of the
equity portion of the portfolio is controlled by limiting the value of any
initial acquisition so that it does not exceed 5% of the market value of the
portfolio when purchased. The policy requires the sale of any portion of an
equity position when its value exceeds 10% of the portfolio. Fixed income market
volatility risk is managed by limiting the term of fixed income investments to
five years. Fixed income investments must carry an “A” or better rating by a
recognized credit rating agency. Corporate debt of a single issuer may not
exceed 10% of the market value of the portfolio. The investment in derivative
instruments such as “naked” call options, futures, commodities, and short
selling is prohibited. Investment in equity index funds and the writing of
“covered” call options (a conservative strategy to increase portfolio income)
are permitted. Foreign currency-denominated debt instruments are not permitted.
At September 30, 2010, there are no significant concentrations of risk in the
assets of the plan with respect to any single entity, industry, country,
commodity or investment fund that are not otherwise mitigated by FDIC insurance
available to the participants of the plan and collateral pledged for any such
amount that may not be covered by FDIC insurance. Investment performance is
measured against industry accepted benchmarks. The risk tolerance and asset
allocation limitations imposed by the policy are consistent with attaining the
rate of return assumptions used in the actuarial funding calculations. The RPIC
committee meets quarterly to review to ensure adherence with the Investment
Policy Statement.
Fair
Values
The fair
values of the Company’s pension plan assets at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009 by asset category are as follows:
At September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
|
Significant Other
|
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
Active Markets for
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Identical Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Asset
Category:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and certificates of deposit
|
$ | 13,902 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 13,902 | ||||||||
Equity
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
Stocks
|
4,141 | - | - | 4,141 | ||||||||||||
American
Depositary Receipts
|
1,127 | - | - | 1,127 | ||||||||||||
Fixed
income securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.
S. Government Agencies
|
- | 850 | - | 850 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
bonds
|
- | 6,580 | - | 6,580 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
103 | - | - | 103 | ||||||||||||
Total
pension plan sssets
|
$ | 19,273 | $ | 7,430 | $ | - | $ | 26,703 |
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
|
Significant Other
|
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
Active Markets for
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Identical Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Asset
Category:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and certificates of deposit
|
$ | 13,405 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 13,405 | ||||||||
Equity
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
Stocks
|
6,471 | - | - | 6,471 | ||||||||||||
American
Depositary Receipts
|
1,488 | - | - | 1,488 | ||||||||||||
Fixed
income securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.
S. Government Agencies
|
- | 2,269 | - | 2,269 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
bonds
|
- | 3,112 | - | 3,112 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
96 | - | - | 96 | ||||||||||||
Total
pension plan sssets
|
$ | 21,460 | $ | 5,381 | $ | - | $ | 26,841 |
Cash
and Deferred Profit Sharing Plan
The Sandy
Spring Bancorp, Inc. Cash and Deferred Profit Sharing Plan includes a 401(k)
provision with a Company match. The 401(k) provision is voluntary and covers all
eligible employees after ninety days of service. Employees contributing to the
401(k) provision receive a matching contribution of 100% of the first 3% of
compensation and 50% of the next 2% of compensation subject to employee
contribution limitations. The Company’s match vests immediately. The Plan
permits employees to purchase shares of Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. common stock
with their 401(k) contributions, Company match, and other contributions under
the Plan. Profit sharing contributions and Company match are included in
non-interest expenses and totaled $0.3 million for both of the three month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $1.0 million for both of the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
15
Executive
Incentive Retirement Plan
In past
years, the Company had Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreements ("SERAs")
with its executive officers providing for retirement income benefits as well as
pre-retirement death benefits. Retirement benefits payable under the SERAs, if
any, were integrated with other pension plan and Social Security retirement
benefits expected to be received by the executive. The Company accrued the
present value of these benefits over the remaining number of years to the
executives' retirement dates. Effective January 1, 2008, these agreements were
replaced with a defined contribution plan, the “Executive Incentive Retirement
Plan” or “the Plan”. Benefits under the SERAs were reduced to a fixed amount as
of December 31, 2007, and those amounts accrued were transferred to the new plan
on behalf of each participant. Additionally, under the new Plan, officers
designated by the board of directors earned a deferral bonus which was accrued
annually based on the Company’s financial performance compared to a selected
group of peer banks. For current participants, accruals for 2008 vested
immediately. Amounts transferred to the Plan from the SERAs on behalf of each
participant continue to vest based on years of service. No bonus was accrued in
2010 or 2009 due to limitations placed on such incentive plans under TARP.
Benefit costs related to the Plan included in non-interest expense for three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 totaled $39 thousand and $0.1 million,
respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Plan
incurred expenses of $.01 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
NOTE
9 – NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
The
following table presents a summary of per share data and amounts for the periods
indicated:
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars and amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 8,484 | $ | (13,574 | ) | $ | 15,244 | $ | (11,637 | ) | ||||||
Less:
Dividends - preferred stock
|
2,074 | 1,205 | 4,477 | 3,607 | ||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
$ | 6,410 | $ | (14,779 | ) | $ | 10,767 | $ | (15,244 | ) | ||||||
Basic:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
weighted average EPS shares
|
24,004 | 16,467 | 21,772 | 16,439 | ||||||||||||
Basic
net income (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.35 | $ | (0.83 | ) | $ | 0.70 | $ | (0.71 | ) | ||||||
Basic
net income (loss) per common share
|
0.27 | (0.90 | ) | 0.49 | (0.93 | ) | ||||||||||
Diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
weighted average EPS shares
|
24,004 | 16,467 | 21,772 | 16,439 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
common stock equivalents
|
98 | - | 40 | - | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
EPS shares
|
24,102 | 16,467 | 21,812 | 16,439 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
net income (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.35 | $ | (0.83 | ) | $ | 0.70 | $ | (0.71 | ) | ||||||
Diluted
net income (loss) per common share
|
0.27 | (0.90 | ) | 0.49 | (0.93 | ) | ||||||||||
Anti-dilutive
shares
|
655 | 789 | 790 | 961 |
Certain
dilutive common stock equivalents, comprised of unexercised/unvested issuances
of shared-based compensation, have been excluded from the computation of EPS in
certain periods if the result would be anti-dilutive.
16
NOTE
10 – OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Comprehensive
income (loss) is defined as net income (loss) plus transactions and other
occurrences that are the result of non-owner changes in equity. For financial
statements presented for the Company, non-owner changes are comprised of
unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale debt securities and any minimum
pension liability adjustments. These do not have an impact on the Company’s net
income (loss). Below are the components of other comprehensive income (loss) and
the related tax effects allocated to each component for the periods
indicated:
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
(In thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 15,244 | $ | (11,637 | ) | |||
Investments
available-for-sale:
|
||||||||
Net
change in unrealized gains on investments
available-for-sale
|
17,187 | 10,852 | ||||||
Related
income tax expense
|
(6,854 | ) | (4,328 | ) | ||||
Net
investment gains (losses) reclassified into earnings
|
323 | 207 | ||||||
Related
income tax expense
|
(129 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||
Net
effect on other comprehensive income for the period
|
10,527 | 6,649 | ||||||
Defined
benefit pension plan:
|
||||||||
Recognition
of unrealized gain
|
846 | 1,020 | ||||||
Related
income tax expense
|
(337 | ) | (407 | ) | ||||
Net
effect on other comprehensive income for the period
|
509 | 613 | ||||||
Total
other comprehensive income
|
11,036 | 7,262 | ||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ | 26,280 | $ | (4,375 | ) |
The
following table presents net accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for
the periods indicated:
(In thousands)
|
Unrealized Gains on
Investments Available-
for-Sale
|
Defined Benefit
Pension Plan
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 3,845 | $ | (6,497 | ) | $ | (2,652 | ) | ||||
Period
change, net of tax
|
10,527 | 509 | 11,036 | |||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2010
|
$ | 14,372 | $ | (5,988 | ) | $ | 8,384 |
(In thousands)
|
Unrealized Gains on
Investments Available-
for-Sale
|
Defined Benefit
Pension Plan
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 461 | $ | (8,033 | ) | $ | (7,572 | ) | ||||
Period
change, net of tax
|
6,649 | 613 | 7,262 | |||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
$ | 7,110 | $ | (7,420 | ) | $ | (310 | ) |
NOTE
11 – FAIR VALUE
Generally
accepted accounting principles provides entities the option to measure eligible
financial assets, financial liabilities and commitments at fair value (i.e. the
fair value option), on an instrument-by-instrument basis, that are otherwise not
permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other accounting standards.
The election to use the fair value option is available when an entity first
recognizes a financial asset or financial liability or upon entering into a
commitment. Subsequent changes in fair value must be recorded in
earnings
The
Company applies the fair value option for mortgage loans held for sale. The fair
value option on residential mortgage loans held for sale allows the accounting
for gains on sale of mortgage loans to more accurately reflect the timing and
economics of the transaction.
The
Company adopted the standards for fair value measurement which clarified that
fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received for
sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants. Fair value measurements are not adjusted for
transaction costs. The standard for fair value measurement establishes a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1
measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3
measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described
below.
17
Basis of Fair Value
Measurement:
Level 1-
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2-
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability;
Level 3-
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to
the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no
market activity).
A
financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
Assets and
Liabilities
Mortgage loans held for
sale
Mortgage
loans held for sale are valued based quotations from the secondary market for
similar instruments and are classified as Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
Investment
available-for-sale
The types
of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include
U.S. government agency securities, many state and municipal government
obligations, mortgage-backed securities (comprised entirely of either the most
senior tranches of GNMA collateralized mortgage obligations or GNMA, FNMA or
FHLMC mortgage-backed securities) and equity securities. Such instruments are
generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company
does not adjust the quoted price for such instruments.
The types
of instruments valued based on quoted prices in markets that are not active,
broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable
levels of price transparency include most investment-grade and high-yield
corporate bonds, liquid mortgage-backed securities, less liquid equities and
state, municipal and provincial obligations. Such instruments are generally
classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Level 3
are positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer
restrictions. Valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or
non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available
market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management uses a process that
employs certain assumptions to determine the present value, for further
information, refer to Note 2 – Investments.
The
Company owns $3.8 million of collateralized debt obligation securities that are
backed by pooled trust preferred securities issued by banks, thrifts, and
insurance companies that have exhibited limited trading activity due to the
state of the economy at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
There are currently very few market participants who are willing and or able to
transact for these securities.
Given
current conditions in the debt markets and the absence of observable
transactions in the secondary markets, the Company has determined:
·
|
The
few observable transactions and market quotations that are available are
not reliable for purposes of determining fair
value.
|
·
|
The
pooled trust preferred securities will be classified within Level 3 of the
fair value and the fair value determined based on independent
modeling.
|
·
|
An
income valuation approach technique (present value technique) that
maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of
unobservable inputs will be more representative of fair value than a
market approach valuation
technique.
|
Interest rate swap
agreements
Interest
rate swap agreements are measured by alternative pricing sources with reasonable
levels of price transparency in markets that are not active. Based on the
complex nature of interest rate swap agreements, the markets these instruments
trade in are not as efficient and are less liquid than that of the more mature
level 1 markets. These markets do however have comparable, observable inputs in
which an alternative pricing source values these assets and liabilities in order
to arrive at a fair market value. These characteristics classify interest rate
swap agreements as Level 2.
18
Assets Measured at Fair
Value on a Recurring Basis
The
following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities for
the periods indicated, that were accounted for or disclosed at fair value.
Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
At September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
mortgage loans held-for-sale
|
$ | - | $ | 19,234 | $ | - | $ | 19,234 | ||||||||
Investments
available-for-sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
government agencies
|
339,092 | 339,092 | ||||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
43,658 | 43,658 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
|
570,919 | 570,919 | ||||||||||||||
Trust
preferred
|
3,410 | 3,134 | 6,544 | |||||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
100 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
- | 1,673 | - | 1,673 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
$ | - | $ | (1,673 | ) | $ | - | $ | (1,673 | ) |
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
mortgage loans held-for-sale
|
$ | - | $ | 12,498 | $ | - | $ | 12,498 | ||||||||
Investments
available-for-sale:
|
- | 855,300 | ||||||||||||||
U.S.
government agencies
|
355,597 | 355,597 | ||||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
42,142 | 42,142 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
|
453,998 | 453,998 | ||||||||||||||
Trust
preferred
|
3,213 | 3,133 | 6,346 | |||||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
350 | 350 | ||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
- | 289 | - | 289 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
$ | - | $ | (289 | ) | $ | - | $ | (289 | ) |
19
The
following table provides unrealized losses included in assets measured in the
consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a recurring basis that are still
held at September 30, 2010.
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
||||
(In thousands)
|
(Level 3)
|
|||
Investments
available-for-sale:
|
||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 3,133 | ||
Total
OTTI included in earnings
|
(219 | ) | ||
Principal
redemption
|
(656 | ) | ||
Total
unrealized gains included in other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
876 | |||
Balance
at September 30, 2010
|
$ | 3,134 |
Assets Measured at Fair
Value on a Non-recurring Basis
The
following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets subject to fair value
adjustments (impairment) on a non-recurring basis as they are valued at the
lower of cost or market. Assets are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement:
At September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
Total
|
Total Losses
|
|||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 63,703 | $ | 63,703 | $ | 9,058 | ||||||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
- | - | 10,011 | 10,011 | 533 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 73,714 | $ | 73,714 | $ | 9,591 |
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
Total
|
Total Losses
|
|||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 92,810 | $ | 92,810 | $ | 39,241 |
At
September 30, 2010, impaired loans totaling $74.3 million were written down to
fair value of $63.7 million as a result of specific loan loss reserves of $10.6
million associated with the impaired loans which was included in the allowance
for loan losses. Impaired loans totaling $99.5 million were written down to fair
value of $92.8 million at December 31, 2009 as a result of specific loan loss
reserves of $6.6 million associated with the impaired loans.
Impaired
loans are valued based on the present value of expected cash flows, the loan’s
observable market price or the fair value of the collateral (less selling costs)
if the loans are collateral dependent and are classified at a level 3 in the fair value
hierarchy. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including
equipment, inventory and/or accounts receivable. The value of business
equipment, inventory and accounts receivable collateral is based on net book
value on the business’ financial statements and, if necessary, discounted based
on management’s review and analysis. Appraised and reported values may be
discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market
conditions from the time of valuation, and/or management’s expertise and
knowledge of the client and client’s business. Impaired loans are reviewed and
evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted
accordingly, based on the same factors identified above.
The
estimated fair value for other real estate owned included in Level 3 is
determined by either an independent market based appraisal less cost to sell,
that may be reduced further based on market expectations or an executed sales
agreement.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
The
Company discloses fair value information about financial instruments for which
it is practicable to estimate the value, whether or not such financial
instruments are recognized on the balance sheet. Fair value is the amount at
which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between
willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation, and is best
evidenced by a quoted market price, if one exists.
20
Quoted
market prices, where available, are shown as estimates of fair market values.
Because no quoted market prices are available for a significant portion of the
Company's financial instruments, the fair value of such instruments has been
derived based on the amount and timing of future cash flows and estimated
discount rates.
Present
value techniques used in estimating the fair value of many of the Company's
financial instruments are significantly affected by the assumptions used. In
that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by
comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in
immediate cash settlement of the instrument. Additionally, the accompanying
estimates of fair values are only representative of the fair values of the
individual financial assets and liabilities, and should not be considered an
indication of the fair value of the Company.
The
estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments are as follows for
the periods indicated:
At September 30, 2010
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Estimated
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Amount
|
Value
|
Amount
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Financial Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and temporary investments (1)
|
$ | 98,959 | $ | 98,959 | $ | 72,294 | $ | 72,294 | ||||||||
Investments
available-for-sale
|
960,313 | 960,313 | 858,433 | 858,433 | ||||||||||||
Investments
held-to-maturity and other equity securities
|
139,205 | 143,950 | 165,366 | 170,560 | ||||||||||||
Loans,
net of allowance
|
2,117,925 | 1,872,245 | 2,233,451 | 2,022,029 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable and other assets (2)
|
92,523 | 92,523 | 89,315 | 89,315 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 2,585,496 | $ | 2,592,086 | $ | 2,696,842 | $ | 2,702,142 | ||||||||
Securities
sold under retail repurchase agreements and federal funds
purchased
|
97,884 | 97,884 | 89,062 | 89,062 | ||||||||||||
Advances
from FHLB
|
409,263 | 456,211 | 411,584 | 441,020 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated
debentures
|
35,000 | 8,837 | 35,000 | 8,077 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest payable and other liabilities (2)
|
4,450 | 4,450 | 3,156 | 3,156 |
(1) Temporary
investments include federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits with banks and
residential mortgage loans held for sale.
(2) Only
financial instruments as defined by GAAP are included in other assets and other
liabilities.
The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each
category of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that
value:
Cash
and Temporary Investments:
Cash and due from banks, federal
funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks. The carrying amount
approximated the fair value.
Residential mortgage loans held for
sale. The fair value of residential mortgage loans held for sale was
derived from secondary market quotations for similar instruments.
Investments. The fair value
for U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency, state and municipal, corporate debt and some
trust preferred securities was based upon quoted market bids; for
mortgage-backed securities upon bid prices for similar pools of fixed and
variable rate assets, considering current market spreads and prepayment speeds;
and, for equity securities upon quoted market prices. Certain trust preferred
securities were estimated by utilizing the discounted value of estimated cash
flows.
Loans. The fair value was
estimated by computing the discounted value of estimated cash flows, adjusted
for potential loan and lease losses, for pools of loans having similar
characteristics. The discount rate was based upon the current loan origination
rate for a similar loan. Non-performing loans have an assumed interest rate of
0%.
Accrued interest receivable.
The carrying amount approximated the fair value of accrued interest, considering
the short-term nature of the receivable and its expected
collection.
21
Other assets. The carrying
amount approximated the fair value considering their short-term
nature.
Deposits. The fair value of
demand, money market savings and regular savings deposits, which have no stated
maturity, were considered equal to their carrying amount, representing the
amount payable on demand. While management believes that the Bank’s core deposit
relationships provide a relatively stable, low-cost funding source that has a
substantial intangible value separate from the value of the deposit balances,
these estimated fair values do not include the intangible value of core deposit
relationships, which comprise a significant portion of the Bank’s deposit base.
The fair value of time deposits was based upon the discounted value of
contractual cash flows at current rates for deposits of similar remaining
maturity.
Securities sold under repurchase
agreements and federal funds purchased. The carrying amount approximated
the fair value of such borrowings due to their variable interest rates and the
short terms.
Advances from FHLB and Subordinated
debentures. The fair value of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta
advances and subordinated debentures was estimated by computing the discounted
value of contractual cash flows payable at current interest rates for
obligations with similar remaining terms.
Accrued interest payable and other
liabilities. The carrying amount approximated the fair value of accrued
interest payable, accrued dividends and premiums payable, considering their
short-term nature and expected payment.
NOTE
12 - SEGMENT REPORTING
The
Company operates in four operating segments—Community Banking, Insurance,
Leasing and Investment Management. Only Community Banking presently meets the
threshold for reportable segment reporting; however, the Company is disclosing
separate information for all four operating segments. Each of the operating
segments is a strategic business unit that offers different products and
services. The Insurance, Leasing and Investment Management segments were
businesses that were acquired in separate transactions where management was
retained at the time of acquisition. The accounting policies of the segments are
described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The segment data reflects inter-segment transactions
and balances.
The
Community Banking segment is conducted through Sandy Spring Bank and involves
delivering a broad range of financial products and services, including various
loan and deposit products to both individuals and businesses. The income of
Sandy Spring Bancorp, the parent company, is included in the Community Banking
segment, as the majority of its functions are related to this segment. Major
revenue sources include net interest income, gains on sales of mortgage loans,
trust income, fees on sales of investment products and service charges on
deposit accounts. Expenses include personnel, occupancy, marketing, equipment
and other expenses. Included in Community Banking expenses are non-cash charges
associated with amortization of intangibles related to acquired entities
totaling $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the amortization related to acquired entities totaled $1.0 million and
$2.4 million, respectively.
The
Insurance segment is conducted through Sandy Spring Insurance Corporation, a
subsidiary of the Bank, and offers annuities as an alternative to traditional
deposit accounts. Sandy Spring Insurance Corporation operates the Chesapeake
Insurance Group, a general insurance agency located in Annapolis, Maryland, and
Neff and Associates, located in Ocean City, Maryland. Major sources of revenue
are insurance commissions from commercial lines, personal lines, and medical
liability lines. Expenses include personnel and support charges. Non-cash
charges were associated with amortization of intangibles related to acquired
entities for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were $.1
million. Non-cash charges associated with amortization amounted to $0.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
The
Leasing segment is conducted through The Equipment Leasing Company, a subsidiary
of the Bank that provides leases for essential commercial equipment used by
small to medium sized businesses. Equipment leasing is conducted through vendor
relations and direct solicitation to end-users located primarily in states along
the east coast from New Jersey to Florida. The typical lease is categorized as a
financing lease and is characterized as a “small ticket” by industry standards,
averaging less than $100 thousand per lease, with individual leases generally
not exceeding $500 thousand. Major revenue sources include interest income.
Expenses include personnel and support charges
The
Investment Management segment is conducted through West Financial Services,
Inc., a subsidiary of the Bank. This asset management and financial planning
firm, located in McLean, Virginia, provides comprehensive investment management
and financial planning to individuals, families, small businesses and
associations including cash flow analysis, investment review, tax planning,
retirement planning, insurance analysis and estate planning. West Financial
currently has approximately $718 million in assets under management. Major
revenue sources include non-interest income earned on the above services.
Expenses include personnel and support charges. Included in investment
management expenses are non-cash charges associated with amortization of
intangibles related to acquired entities totaling $0.1 million and $0.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These
charges amounted to $0.2 million and $0.6 million for the nine month periods
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
22
Information
about operating segments and reconciliation of such information to the
consolidated financial statements follows for the periods
indicated:
Three Months Ended September 30,
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community
|
Investment
|
Inter-Segment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Banking
|
Insurance
|
Leasing
|
Mgmt.
|
Elimination
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 37,110 | $ | 2 | $ | 340 | $ | 2 | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 37,367 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
7,871 | - | 84 | - | (87 | ) | 7,868 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
2,453 | - | - | - | - | 2,453 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
8,565 | 1,102 | 58 | 1,216 | (203 | ) | 10,738 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
expenses
|
23,679 | 1,080 | 65 | 718 | (203 | ) | 25,339 | |||||||||||||||||
Income before
income taxes
|
11,672 | 24 | 249 | 500 | - | 12,445 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
3,668 | 10 | 88 | 195 | - | 3,961 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 8,004 | $ | 14 | $ | 161 | $ | 305 | $ | - | $ | 8,484 | ||||||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 3,613,455 | $ | 12,764 | $ | 18,385 | $ | 13,079 | $ | (51,066 | ) | $ | 3,606,617 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community
|
Investment
|
Inter-Segment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Banking
|
Insurance
|
Leasing
|
Mgmt.
|
Elimination
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 38,823 | $ | 2 | $ | 551 | $ | 1 | $ | (192 | ) | $ | 39,185 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
12,785 | - | 190 | - | (192 | ) | 12,783 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
34,450 | - | - | - | - | 34,450 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
8,302 | 1,224 | 88 | 1,201 | (153 | ) | 10,662 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
expenses
|
24,563 | 1,174 | 126 | 857 | (153 | ) | 26,567 | |||||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(24,673 | ) | 52 | 323 | 345 | - | (23,953 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(10,653 | ) | 21 | 118 | 135 | - | (10,379 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (14,020 | ) | $ | 31 | $ | 205 | $ | 210 | $ | - | $ | (13,574 | ) | ||||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 3,644,641 | $ | 12,348 | $ | 28,147 | $ | 11,931 | $ | (64,676 | ) | $ | 3,632,391 |
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community
|
Investment
|
Inter-Segment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Banking
|
Insurance
|
Leasing
|
Mgmt.
|
Elimination
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 111,370 | $ | 6 | $ | 1,184 | $ | 4 | $ | (329 | ) | $ | 112,235 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
25,590 | - | 320 | - | (329 | ) | 25,581 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
23,585 | - | - | - | - | 23,585 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
26,354 | 4,348 | 142 | 3,711 | (608 | ) | 33,947 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
expenses
|
71,179 | 3,396 | 294 | 2,337 | (608 | ) | 76,598 | |||||||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
17,370 | 958 | 712 | 1,378 | - | 20,418 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
3,975 | 387 | 275 | 537 | - | 5,174 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 13,395 | $ | 571 | $ | 437 | $ | 841 | $ | - | $ | 15,244 | ||||||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 3,613,455 | $ | 12,764 | $ | 18,385 | $ | 13,079 | $ | (51,066 | ) | $ | 3,606,617 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community
|
Investment
|
Inter-Segment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Banking
|
Insurance
|
Leasing
|
Mgmt.
|
Elimination
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 115,434 | $ | 5 | $ | 1,785 | $ | 4 | $ | (647 | ) | $ | 116,581 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
40,714 | - | 639 | - | (647 | ) | 40,706 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
55,678 | - | - | - | - | 55,678 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
25,773 | 4,733 | 231 | 3,388 | (459 | ) | 33,666 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
expenses
|
71,247 | 3,767 | 479 | 2,641 | (459 | ) | 77,675 | |||||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(26,432 | ) | 971 | 898 | 751 | - | (23,812 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(13,210 | ) | 392 | 350 | 293 | - | (12,175 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (13,222 | ) | $ | 579 | $ | 548 | $ | 458 | $ | - | $ | (11,637 | ) | ||||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 3,644,641 | $ | 12,348 | $ | 28,147 | $ | 11,931 | $ | (64,676 | ) | $ | 3,632,391 |
23
Item
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
GENERAL
The
Company
Sandy
Spring Bancorp (the “Company”) is the registered bank holding company for Sandy
Spring Bank (the "Bank"), headquartered in Olney, Maryland. The Bank
operates forty three community offices in Anne Arundel, Carroll, Frederick,
Howard, Montgomery, and Prince George’s Counties in Maryland and Fairfax and
Loudoun counties in Virginia, together with an insurance subsidiary, equipment
leasing company and an investment management company in McLean,
Virginia.
The
Company offers a broad range of financial services to consumers and businesses
in this market area. Through September 30, 2010, average commercial loans and
leases and commercial real estate loans accounted for approximately 58% of the
Company’s loan and lease portfolio, and average consumer and residential real
estate loans accounted for approximately 42%. The Company has established a
strategy of independence and intends to establish or acquire additional offices,
banking organizations, and non-banking organizations as appropriate
opportunities arise.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of
America and follow general practices within the industry in which it
operates. Application of these principles requires management to make
estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates,
assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of
the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the
financial statements may reflect different estimates, assumptions, and
judgments. Certain policies inherently rely to a greater extent on
the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater
possibility of producing results that could be materially different than
originally reported. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary for
assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair
value. A decline in the assets required to be recorded at fair
values will warrant an impairment write-down or valuation allowance to be
established. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently
results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and
the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and
liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other
third-party sources, when readily available. The following accounting
policies comprise those policies that management believes are the most critical
to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial
results:
|
·
|
Allowance
for loan and lease losses;
|
|
·
|
Goodwill
impairment;
|
|
·
|
Accounting
for income taxes;
|
|
·
|
Fair
value measurements, including assessment of other-than-temporary
impairment;
|
|
·
|
Defined
benefit pension plan.
|
Allowance
for loan and lease losses
The
allowance for loan and lease losses is an estimate of the losses that are
inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is based on
two basic principles of accounting: (1) the requirement that a loss be accrued
when it is probable that the loss has occurred at the date of the financial
statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated and (2) the
requirement that losses be accrued when it is probable that the Company will not
collect all principal and interest payments according to the loan’s or lease’s
contractual terms.
Management
believes that the allowance is adequate. However, its determination requires
significant judgment, and estimates of probable losses in the loan and lease
portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. While
management uses available information to recognize probable losses, future
additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in the loans and
leases comprising the portfolio and changes in the financial condition of
borrowers, such as may result from changes in economic conditions. In addition,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
and independent consultants engaged by the Company, periodically review the loan
and lease portfolio and the allowance. Such review may result in
additional provisions based on their judgments of information available at the
time of each examination.
The
Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses has two basic components: a
general reserve reflecting historical losses by loan category, as adjusted by
several factors whose effects are not reflected in historical loss ratios, and
specific allowances for separately identified impaired loans. Each of
these components, and the systematic allowance methodology used to establish
them, are described in detail in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009. The amount of the allowance is
reviewed monthly by the Credit Risk Committee of the board of directors and
formally approved quarterly by that same committee of the board.
24
The
general reserve portion of the allowance that is based upon historical loss
factors, as adjusted, establishes allowances for the major loan categories based
upon adjusted historical loss experience over the prior eight quarters, weighted
so that losses realized in the most recent quarters have the greatest
effect. The use of these historical loss factors is intended to
reduce the differences between estimated losses inherent in the loan and lease
portfolio and actual losses. The factors used to adjust the historical loss
ratios address changes in the risk characteristics of the Company’s loan and
lease portfolio that are related to (1) trends in delinquencies and other
non-performing loans, (2) changes in the risk level of the loan portfolio
related to large loans, (3) changes in the categories of loans
comprising the loan portfolio, (4) concentrations of loans to specific industry
segments, (5) changes in economic conditions on both a local and national level,
(6) changes in the Company’s credit administration and loan and lease portfolio
management processes, and (7) quality of the Company’s credit risk
identification processes. This component comprised 84% of the total allowance at
September 30, 2010 and 89% at December 31, 2009.
A
specific allowance is used to establish an allowance for individual impaired
credits and is based on the Company’s calculation of the potential loss imbedded
in an individual loan. At September 30, 2010, the specific allowance accounted
for 16% of the total allowance as compared to 11% at December 31, 2009. The
process of evaluating whether a loan is impaired includes consideration of the
borrower’s financial condition, resources and payment record, the sufficiency of
collateral and to a lesser extent, the credible financial support from
guarantors. The measurement of impairment for individual impaired credits is
based on the present value of expected cash flows, the loan’s observable market
price or the fair value of the collateral (less selling costs), if the loan is
collateral dependent. The severity of estimated losses on impaired
loans can differ substantially from actual losses.
Goodwill
Goodwill
is the excess of the fair value of liabilities assumed over the fair value of
tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination.
Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might
be impaired. Impairment testing requires that the fair value of each of the
Company’s reporting units be compared to the carrying amount of its net assets,
including goodwill. The Company’s reporting units were identified based upon an
analysis of each of its individual operating segments. Determining the fair
value of a reporting unit requires the Company to use a high degree of
subjectivity. If the fair values of the reporting units exceed their book
values, no write-down of recorded goodwill is necessary. If the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than book value, an expense may be required on the
Company’s books to write down the related goodwill to the proper carrying value.
The Company tests for impairment of goodwill as of October 1 of each year, and
again at any quarter-end if any triggering events occur during a quarter that
may affect goodwill. Examples of such events include, but are not limited to
adverse action by a regulator or a loss of key personnel. For this testing the
Company typically works together with a third-party valuation firm to perform a
“step one” test for potential goodwill impairment. At September 30,
2010 it was determined that there was no evidence of impairment of goodwill or
intangibles.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes by recording deferred income taxes that
reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the
amounts used for income tax purposes. Management exercises significant judgment
in the evaluation of the amount and timing of the recognition of the resulting
tax assets and liabilities. The judgments and estimates required for the
evaluation are updated based upon changes in business factors and the tax laws.
If actual results differ from the assumptions and other considerations used in
estimating the amount and timing of tax recognized, there can be no assurance
that additional expenses will not be required in future periods. The Company’s
accounting policy follows the prescribed authoritative guidance that a minimal
probability threshold of a tax position must be met before a financial statement
benefit is recognized. The Company recognized, when applicable, interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in other non-interest expenses in
the Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss). Assessment of uncertain tax
positions requires careful consideration of the technical merits of a position
based on management’s analysis of tax regulations and interpretations.
Significant judgment may be involved in applying the applicable reporting and
accounting requirements.
Management
expects that the Company’s adherence to the required accounting guidance may
result in increased volatility in quarterly and annual effective income tax
rates because of the requirement that any change in judgment or measurement of a
tax position taken in a prior period be recognized as a discrete event in the
period in which it occurs. Factors that could impact management’s judgment
include changes in income, tax laws and regulations, and tax planning
strategies.
Fair
Value
The
Company, in accordance with applicable accounting standards, measures certain
financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Significant financial
instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are investment
securities available for sale and commercial loan interest rate swap
agreements. The Company elected, at its option, to measure mortgage
loans held for sale at fair value. Loans where it is probable that the Company
will not collect all principal and interest payments according to the
contractual terms are considered impaired loans and are measured on a
non-recurring basis. In addition, other real estate owned is also measured at
fair value by the Company on a non-recurring basis.
25
The
Company conducts a review each quarter for all investment securities which
reflect possible impairment to determine whether unrealized losses are
temporary. Valuations for the investment portfolio are determined using quoted
market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, such
valuation is based on pricing models, quotes for similar investment securities,
and, where necessary, an income valuation approach based on the present value of
expected cash flows. In addition, the Company considers the financial condition
of each issuer, the receipt of principal and interest according to the
contractual terms and the intent and ability of the Company to hold the
investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery
in fair value.
The above
accounting policies with respect to fair value are discussed in further detail
in “Note 11-Fair Value” to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plan
The
Company has a qualified, noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan covering
substantially all employees. All benefit accruals for employees were
frozen as of December 31, 2007 based on past service. Thus, future salary
increases and additional years of service will no longer affect the defined
benefit provided by the plan although additional vesting may continue to
occur.
Several
factors affect the net periodic benefit cost of the plan, including (1) the size
and characteristics of the plan population, (2) the discount rate, (3) the
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and (4) other actuarial
assumptions. Pension cost is directly related to the number of employees covered
by the plan and other factors including salary, age, years of employment, and
the terms of the plan. As a result of the plan freeze, the characteristics of
the plan population should not have a materially different effect in future
years. The discount rate is used to determine the present value of future
benefit obligations. The discount rate is determined by matching the expected
cash flows of the plan to a yield curve based on long term, high quality fixed
income debt instruments available as of the measurement date, which is December
31 of each year. The discount rate is adjusted each year on the measurement date
to reflect current market conditions. The expected long-term rate of return on
plan assets is based on a number of factors that include expectations of market
performance and the target asset allocation adopted in the plan investment
policy. Should actual asset returns deviate from the projected returns, this can
affect the benefit plan expense recognized in the financial
statements.
A.
|
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
|
The
Company's total assets were $3.6 billion at September 30, 2010, decreasing $23.9
million or 1% during the first nine months of 2010. Earning assets
remained virtually level for the first nine months of the year at $3.3 billion
at September 30, 2010. The decrease in total assets for the first
nine months of the year was due primarily to a 5% decline in loans as a result
of current conditions in both the national and regional economy. Also
contributing to this decrease was the repayment by the Company of half of the
preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under TARP. The Company repurchased
41,547 shares for $41.5 million on July 21, 2010.
Loans
and Leases
Total
loans and leases, excluding loans held for sale, decreased $112.8 million or 5%
during the first nine months of 2010 to $2.2 billion. Residential real estate
loans, comprised of residential construction and permanent residential mortgage
loans, decreased $14.5 million or 3%, to $535.2 million at September 30,
2010. Permanent residential mortgages declined to $442.7 million in
2010, a decrease of $14.7 million or 3% reflecting greatly reduced demand for
adjustable rate mortgages due to regional economic conditions. The Company
generally retains adjustable rate mortgages in its portfolio and sells the fixed
rate mortgages that it originates in the secondary mortgage market. Residential
construction loans remained virtually level for the first nine months of 2010 at
$92.5 million as of September 30, 2010.
Commercial
loans and leases, which includes commercial real estate loans, commercial
construction loans, equipment leases and commercial business loans, decreased by
$90.1 million or 7%, to $1.3 billion at September 30, 2010. This decrease was
due primarily to loan pay-downs and charge-offs of problem credits during the
year resulting from the Company’s aggressive efforts to reduce its
non-performing assets. In addition, soft loan demand resulting from continuing
weak market conditions in the regional and national economies played a role in
reducing these loan balances as pay-off of performing credits outpaced new
originations.
The
Company's commercial real estate mortgage loans are secured by owner occupied
properties (60%) where an established banking relationship exists or, to a
lesser extent, by investment properties (40%) such as warehouse, retail, and
office space with a history of occupancy and cash flow. The
relatively low increase in commercial real estate loans and the decreases in
commercial construction and commercial business loans were due primarily to the
lower level of loan demand caused by weak economic conditions in the markets in
which the Company does business.
Consumer
lending continues to be an integral part of the Company’s full-service,
community banking business. This category of loans includes primarily
home equity loans and lines of credit. The consumer loan portfolio
decreased 2% or $8.2 million, to $391.4 million at September 30,
2010. This decline was driven largely by a decrease of $6.2 million
or 16% in installment loans to $31.9 million at quarter-end. Home equity lines
and loans remained virtually even with the prior year-end at $352.5 million at
September 30, 2010.
26
Table
1– Analysis of Loans and Leases
The
following table presents the trends in the composition of the loan and lease
portfolio for the periods indicated.
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
2010/2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residential
real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
mortgages
|
$ | 442,723 | 20.3 | % | $ | 457,414 | 19.9 | % | $ | (14,691 | ) | (3.2 | )% | |||||||||||
Residential
construction
|
92,485 | 4.2 | 92,283 | 4.0 | 202 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
loans and leases:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
mortgage
|
903,195 | 41.4 | 894,951 | 39.0 | 8,244 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction
|
96,823 | 4.4 | 131,789 | 5.7 | (34,966 | ) | (26.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial
business
|
240,671 | 11.0 | 296,220 | 12.9 | (55,549 | ) | (18.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Leases
|
17,895 | 0.8 | 25,704 | 1.1 | (7,809 | ) | (30.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
391,415 | 17.9 | 399,649 | 17.4 | (8,234 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
loans and leases
|
$ | 2,185,207 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,298,010 | 100.0 | % | $ | (112,803 | ) | (4.9 | ) |
Investments
The
investment portfolio, consisting of available-for-sale, held-to-maturity and
other equity securities, increased $75.7 million or 7% to $1.1 billion at
September 30, 2010, from $1.0 billion at December 31, 2009. This increase was
due primarily to investment of excess liquidity due to the decline in the loan
portfolio during the first nine months of 2010.
Table
2 – Analysis of Securities
The
composition of securities for the periods indicated is reflected
in the following table:
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
2010/2009
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale:
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
government agencies and corporations
|
$ | 339,092 | $ | 355,597 | $ | (16,505 | ) | (4.6 | )% | |||||||
State
and municipal
|
43,658 | 42,142 | 1,516 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
(2)
|
570,919 | 453,998 | 116,921 | 25.8 | ||||||||||||
Trust
preferred
|
6,544 | 6,346 | 198 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
100 | 350 | (250 | ) | (71.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
available-for-sale
|
960,313 | 858,433 | 101,880 | 11.9 | ||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity
and Other Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
106,032 | 131,996 | (25,964 | ) | (19.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
(2)
|
521 | 597 | (76 | ) | (12.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
equity securities
|
32,652 | 32,773 | (121 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
held-to-maturity and other equity
|
139,205 | 165,366 | (26,161 | ) | (15.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
securities
|
$ | 1,099,518 | $ | 1,023,799 | $ | 75,719 | 7.4 |
(1)
|
At
estimated fair value.
|
(2)
|
Issued
by a U. S. Government Agency or secured by U.S. Government Agency
collateral.
|
Portfolio quality
discussion
At
September 30, 2010, unrealized losses associated with U.S. Government Agencies
have been caused by changes in interest rates and are not considered credit
related as the contractual cash flows of these investments are either explicitly
or implicitly backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S.
government. The municipal securities portfolio segment is not
experiencing any significant credit problems at September 30, 2010 and the
Company believes it will receive all contractual cash flows due on this
portfolio. The mortgage-backed securities portfolio at September 30,
2010 is composed entirely of either the most senior tranches of GNMA
collateralized mortgage obligations ($229.2 million), or GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC
mortgage-backed securities ($341.7 million). Any associated
unrealized losses have been caused by changes in interest rates and are not
considered credit related as the contractual cash flows of these investments are
either explicitly or implicitly backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S.
government. Unrealized losses that are related to the prevailing
interest rate environment will decline over time and recover as these securities
approach maturity.
27
At
September 30, 2010, the Company owned a total of $3.0 million in securities
backed by single issuer trust preferred securities issued by banks. The fair
value of these securities was $3.4 million as determined using broker
quotations. The Company also owns pooled trust preferred securities, which total
$3.8 million, with a fair value of $3.1 million. These pooled
securities are backed by the trust preferred securities issued by banks,
thrifts, and insurance companies. These particular securities have exhibited
limited trading activity due to the state of the economy. There are
currently very few market participants who are willing and or able to transact
for these securities. Given current conditions in the debt markets
and the absence of observable transactions in the secondary markets, the Company
has determined:
|
·
|
The
few observable transactions and market quotations that are available are
not reliable for purposes of determining fair
value.
|
|
·
|
The
pooled trust preferred securities will be classified within Level 3 of the
fair value hierarchy and the fair value is determined based upon
independent modeling.
|
|
·
|
An
income valuation approach technique (present value technique) that
maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of
unobservable inputs will be more representative of fair value than a
market approach valuation
technique.
|
The
assumptions used to determine fair value on a present value basis, in the
absence of observable trading prices as noted, included the
following:
·
|
Detailed
credit and structural evaluation for each piece of collateral in the
pooled trust preferred
securities.
|
·
|
Collateral
performance projections for each piece of collateral in the pooled trust
preferred securities (default, recovery and prepayment/amortization
probabilities).
|
·
|
Terms
of the structure of the pooled trust preferred securities as established
in the indenture.
|
·
|
An
11.1% discount rate that was developed by using the risk free rate
adjusted for a risk premium and a liquidity adjustment that considered the
characteristics of the securities and the related
collateral
|
As part
of its formal quarterly evaluation of the pooled trust preferred securities for
the presence of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”), the Company utilized a
third party valuation service. The Company reviewed the methodology
employed by the third party valuation service for reasonableness by considering
a number of inputs and the appropriateness of the key underlying assumptions
above. In addition, the Company also reviewed and considered the
following:
|
·
|
The
projected cash flows from the underlying securities that incorporate
default expectations and the severity of
losses;
|
|
·
|
The
underlying cause and conditions associated with defaults or deferrals and
an assessment of the relative strength of the
issuer;
|
|
·
|
The
receipt of payments on a timely basis and the ability of the issuer to
make scheduled interest or principal
payments;
|
|
·
|
The
length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than
the amortized cost;
|
|
·
|
Adverse
conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or geographic
area;
|
|
·
|
Historical
and implied volatility of the fair value of the
security;
|
|
·
|
Credit
risk concentrations;
|
|
·
|
Amount
of principal likely to be recovered by stated
maturity;
|
|
·
|
Ratings
changes of the security;
|
|
·
|
Performance
of bond collateral;
|
|
·
|
Recoveries
of additional declines in fair value subsequent to the date of the
statement of condition;
|
|
·
|
That
the securities are senior notes with first
priority;
|
|
·
|
Other
information currently available, such as the latest trustee reports;
and
|
|
·
|
An
analysis of the credit worthiness of the remaining individual pooled
banks.
|
As a
result of this evaluation, it was determined that the pooled trust preferred
securities issued by banks had credit-related OTTI of $219 thousand which was
recognized in earnings for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. The credit-related OTTI recognized in earnings for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 was $130 thousand. Non-credit related OTTI on
these securities, which are not expected to be sold and that the Company has the
ability to hold until maturity, was $699 thousand and was recognized in other
comprehensive income (“OCI”) at September 30, 2010. At September 30,
2010, all payments have been received as contractually required on these
securities.
At
September 30, 2010, the Company held $350 thousand in marketable equity
securities of two entities. The quarterly review of the financial statements and
review of other recently available data determined that OTTI existed with
respect to one of the investments. As a result, the Company recognized in
earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 credit-related
OTTI of $250 thousand which represented the Company’s entire investment in the
particular institution.
28
Table
3 – Analysis of Deposits
The
composition of deposits for the periods indicated is reflected in the following
table:
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
2010/2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
$ Change
|
% change
|
||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
deposits
|
$ | 580,309 | 22.4 | % | $ | 540,578 | 20.0 | % | $ | 39,731 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand
|
294,487 | 11.4 | 282,045 | 10.5 | 12,442 | 4.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market savings
|
884,537 | 34.2 | 931,362 | 34.5 | (46,825 | ) | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Regular
savings
|
165,169 | 6.4 | 157,072 | 5.8 | 8,097 | 5.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits of less than $100,000
|
369,019 | 14.3 | 421,978 | 15.7 | (52,959 | ) | (12.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits of $100,000 or more
|
291,975 | 11.3 | 363,807 | 13.5 | (71,832 | ) | (19.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing deposits
|
2,005,187 | 77.6 | 2,156,264 | 80.0 | (151,077 | ) | (7.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
$ | 2,585,496 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,696,842 | 100.0 | % | $ | (111,346 | ) | (4.1 | ) |
Deposits
and Borrowings
Total
deposits were $2.6 billion at September 30, 2010, decreasing $111.3 million or
4% compared to December 31, 2009. Balances for non-interest-bearing demand
deposits at September 30, 2010 increased $39.7 million or 7% over the previous
year-end while interest-bearing deposits declined $151.0 million or 7%. The
decrease in interest-bearing deposits was due in large part to a decline in
money market savings and time deposit accounts due to clients redeploying these
funds in search of higher rates or into short-term accounts to await an increase
in overall market rates. This is reflected somewhat in the increases in
noninterest-bearing and regular savings accounts. When deposits are combined
with retail repurchase agreements from core customers, the overall decline in
customer funding sources totaled 3% compared to the previous year-end. Total
borrowings increased by $6.5 million or 1% to $542.1 million at September 30,
2010 due mainly to an increase in retail repurchase agreements.
Capital
Management
Management
monitors historical and projected earnings, dividends and asset growth, as well
as risks associated with the various types of on and off-balance sheet assets
and liabilities, in order to determine appropriate capital levels. On March 17,
2010, the Company completed an offering of 7.5 million common shares at a price
of $13.50 per share, before the underwriting discount of $.675 per
share. This resulted in proceeds of $95.6 million, net of the
offering expenses. Each share of the issued common stock has the same
relative rights as, and is identical in all respects with, each other share of
common stock. In July, 2010, the Company received approval from the U. S.
Treasury to repurchase half of the Series A Preferred Stock issued pursuant to
the Company’s participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Accordingly,
on July 21, 2010 the Company repurchased 41,547 preferred shares for
approximately $41.5 million. As a result of this repayment, the Company
recognized $1.3 million in accelerated discount accretion in the third quarter
of 2010. This transaction had no effect on the outstanding warrant to purchase
common shares sold to the U. S. Treasury as part of the original issuance of the
preferred stock. The Company intends to work with the Treasury to secure
approval for repurchase of the remaining preferred shares. Largely as
a result of these two transactions, stockholders’ equity increased to $451.7
million at September 30, 2010, an increase of 21% or $78.1 million from $373.6
million at December 31, 2009.
External
capital formation, resulting from the Company’s common stock offering earlier
this year, together with exercises of stock options, vesting of restricted stock
and from stock issuances under the employee and director stock purchase plans
totaled $96.0 million during the first nine months of 2010.
Stockholders’
equity was also affected by an increase of $11.0 million, net of tax, in
accumulated other comprehensive income from December 31, 2009 to September 30,
2010. The ratio of average equity to average assets was 12.14% at September 30,
2010 as compared to 10.94% at December 31, 2009.
Regulatory
Capital
Bank
holding companies and banks are required to maintain capital ratios in
accordance with guidelines adopted by the federal bank regulators. These
guidelines are commonly known as Risk-Based Capital guidelines. The actual
regulatory ratios and required ratios for capital adequacy for the bank holding
company are summarized in the following table.
29
Table
4 – Risk-Based Capital Ratios
Ratios at
|
Minimum
|
|||||||||||
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
Regulatory
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Requirements
|
||||||||||
Total
Capital to risk-weighted assets
|
16.56 | % | 13.27 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||
Tier
1 Capital to risk-weighted assets
|
15.29 | % | 12.01 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||||
Tier
1 Leverage
|
11.15 | % | 9.09 | % | 3.00 | % |
Tier 1
capital of $394.2 million and total qualifying capital of $426.9 million each
included $35.0 million in trust preferred securities that are considered
regulatory capital for purposes of determining the Company’s Tier 1 capital
ratio. In addition, Tier 1 capital included $41.5 million in preferred stock
which was sold to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program as
described above. Lastly, both Tier 1 and total qualifying capital include the
proceeds of the Company’s common stock offering of $95.6 million which was
completed in March, 2010. Should the Company receive approval to repurchase the
remaining TARP Series A Preferred Stock, as mentioned previously, these ratios
will decrease in the coming quarter. The most recent notification from the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond categorized the subsidiary bank as
a "well-capitalized" institution under the prompt corrective action rules
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Designation as a
well-capitalized institution under these regulations is not a recommendation or
endorsement of the Company or the Bank by federal bank regulators
Tangible
Common Equity
Tangible
equity and tangible assets are non-GAAP financial measures calculated using GAAP
amounts. Tangible equity excludes the balance of goodwill and other intangible
assets from our calculation of stockholders’ equity. Tangible assets exclude the
balance of goodwill and other intangible assets from our calculation of total
assets. Management believes that this non-GAAP financial measure
provides an important benchmark that is useful to investors in understanding and
assessing the financial condition of the Company. Because not all
companies use the same calculation of tangible equity and tangible assets, this
presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures calculated
by other companies. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP ratio of
tangible equity to tangible assets is provided on the following
table.
Table
5 – Tangible Common Equity Ratio – Non-GAAP
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Tangible
common equity ratio:
|
||||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
$ | 451,717 | $ | 373,586 | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(8,384 | ) | 2,652 | |||||
Goodwill
|
(76,816 | ) | (76,816 | ) | ||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
(7,050 | ) | (8,537 | ) | ||||
Preferred
stock
|
(40,308 | ) | (80,095 | ) | ||||
Tangible
common equity
|
$ | 319,159 | $ | 210,790 | ||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 3,606,617 | $ | 3,630,478 | ||||
Goodwill
|
(76,816 | ) | (76,816 | ) | ||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
(7,050 | ) | (8,537 | ) | ||||
Tangible
assets
|
$ | 3,522,751 | $ | 3,545,125 | ||||
Tangible
common equity ratio
|
9.06 | % | 5.95 | % |
Credit
Risk
The
Company's borrowers are concentrated in six counties in Maryland and two
counties in Virginia. Commercial and residential mortgages, including
home equity loans and lines, represented 78% of total loans and leases at
September 30, 2010, compared to 74% at December 31, 2009. Certain
loan terms may create concentrations of credit risk and increase the Company’s
exposure to loss.
30
The
fundamental lending business of the Company is based on understanding, measuring
and controlling the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The
Company’s loan and lease portfolio is subject to varying degrees of credit
risk. Credit risk entails both general risks, which are inherent in
the process of lending, and risk specific to individual
borrowers. The Company’s credit risk is mitigated through portfolio
diversification, which limits exposure to any single customer, industry or
collateral type. Typically, each consumer and residential lending
product has a predictable level of credit losses based on historical loss
experience. Home mortgage and home equity loans and lines generally
have the lowest credit loss experience. Loans secured by personal
property, such as auto loans generally experience medium credit
losses. Unsecured loan products such as personal revolving credit
have the highest credit loss experience; therefore, the Bank has chosen not to
engage in a significant amount of this type of lending. Credit risk
in commercial lending can vary significantly, as losses as a percentage of
outstanding loans can shift widely during economic cycles and are particularly
sensitive to changing economic conditions. Generally, improving
economic conditions result in improved operating results on the part of
commercial customers, enhancing their ability to meet their particular debt
service requirements. Improvements, if any, in operating cash flows
can be offset by the impact of rising interest rates that may occur during
improved economic times. Declining economic conditions have an
adverse affect on the operating results of commercial customers, reducing their
ability to meet debt service obligations.
Recent
economic conditions have had a broad based impact on the Company’s loan
portfolio as a whole. While current economic data has shown the
Mid-Atlantic region is outperforming most other markets in the nation, the
Company’s lending portfolio is dealing with the impact from the economic
pressures that are being experienced by its borrowers, especially in the
construction lending portfolios. Due to workouts of existing
non-performing loans and a marked decline in the migration of new problem
credits, the Company saw a marked decline in non-performing loans, particularly
in the commercial and residential real estate development portfolios from
December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010. While the diversification of
the lending portfolio among different commercial, residential and consumer
product lines along with different market conditions of the D.C. suburbs,
Northern Virginia and Baltimore metropolitan area have mitigated some of the
risks in the portfolio, weakened local economic conditions and non-performing
loan levels may continue to be influenced by an uncertain economic recovery on
both a regional and national level.
To
control and manage credit risk, management has a credit process in place to
ensure credit standards are maintained along with a robust in-house loan
administration accompanied by strong oversight and review
procedures. The primary purpose of loan underwriting is the
evaluation of specific lending risks that involves the analysis of the
borrower’s ability to service the debt as well as the assessment of the value of
the underlying collateral. Oversight and review procedures include
the monitoring of the portfolio credit quality, early identification of
potential problem credits and the aggressive management of the problem
credits. As part of the oversight and review process, the Company
maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses (the “allowance”) to absorb
estimated and probable losses in the loan and lease portfolio. The
allowance is based on consistent, continuous review and evaluation of the loan
and lease portfolio, along with ongoing, monthly assessments of the probable
losses and problem credits in each portfolio.
The
Company recognizes a collateral dependent lending relationship as non-performing
when either the loan becomes 90 days delinquent or as a result of factors (such
as bankruptcy, interruption of cash flows, etc.) considered at the monthly
credit committee meeting. Except in limited circumstances, commercial loans are
generally placed into non-accrual status once they become 90 days past due and
are considered, collectively, to be non-performing When a
commercial loan is placed on non-accrual status, it is considered to be impaired
and all accrued but unpaid interest is reversed. Impaired loans
exclude large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively
evaluated for impairment such as leases, residential real estate and consumer
loans. All payments received on non-accrual loans are applied to the
remaining principal balance of the loan(s). Integral to the
assessment of the allowance process is, an evaluation that is performed to
determine whether a specific reserve on a problem credit is warranted and, when
losses are confirmed, a charge-off is taken that is at least in the amount of
the collateral deficiency as determined by an independent third party
appraisal. Any further collateral deterioration results in either
further specific reserves being established or additional
charge-offs. At such time an action plan is agreed upon for the
particular loan and an appraisal will be ordered depending on the time elapsed
since the prior appraisal, the loan balance and/or the result of the internal
evaluation. A current appraisal is usually obtained if the appraisal
on file is more than 12 months old. The Company’s policy is to
strictly adhere to regulatory appraisal standards. If an appraisal is
ordered, no more than a 30 day turnaround is requested from the appraiser, who
is selected by Credit Administration from an approved appraiser list. After
receipt of the updated appraisal, the assigned credit officer will recommend to
the Chief Credit Officer whether a specific reserve or a charge-off should be
taken. The Chief Credit Officer has the authority to approve a specific reserve
or charge-off between monthly credit committee meetings to insure that there are
no significant time lapses during this process.
The
Company’s systematic methodology for evaluating whether a loan is impaired
begins with risk-rating credits on an individual basis and includes
consideration of the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and
payment record, the sufficiency of collateral and, in a select few cases,
support from financial guarantors. The Company as a consistent
practice does not rely solely on the existence of guarantees when determining
whether a loan is impaired and in measuring the amount of the impairment. In
measuring impairment, the Company looks to the discounted cash flows of the
project itself or the value of the collateral as the primary sources of
repayment of the loan. While the Company will consider the existence of
guarantees and the financial strength and wherewithal of the guarantors involved
in any loan relationship, it considers such guarantees only as a secondary
source of repayment. Accordingly, the guarantee alone would not be sufficient to
avoid classifying the loan as impaired.
31
The
Company relied on current (12 months old or less) third party appraisals of the
collateral to assist in measuring impairment on over 95% of impaired loans. In
the relatively rare cases in which the Company did not rely on a third party
appraisal, an internal evaluation was prepared by an approved credit
officer.
Management
has established a credit process that dictates that structured procedures be
performed to monitor these loans between the receipt of an original appraisal
and the updated appraisal. These procedures include the
following:
|
·
|
An
internal evaluation is updated quarterly to include borrower financial
statements and/or cash flow
projections.
|
|
·
|
The
client may be contacted for a meeting to discuss an updated or revised
action plan which may include a request for additional
collateral.
|
|
·
|
Re-verification
of the documentation supporting the Company’s position with respect to the
collateral securing the loan.
|
|
·
|
At
the monthly credit committee meeting the loan may be downgraded and a
specific reserve may be decided upon in advance of the receipt of the
appraisal.
|
|
·
|
Upon
receipt of the updated appraisal (or based on an updated internal
financial evaluation) the loan balance is compared to the appraisal and a
specific reserve is decided upon for the particular loan, typically for
the amount of the difference between the appraisal and the loan
balance.
|
|
·
|
The
Company will specifically reserve for or charge-off the excess of the loan
amount over the amount of the appraisal. In certain cases the Company may
establish a larger reserve due to knowledge of current market conditions
or the existence of an offer for the collateral that will facilitate a
more timely resolution of the loan.
|
If an
updated appraisal is received subsequent to the preliminary determination of a
specific reserve or partial charge-off, and it is less than the initial
appraisal used in the initial charge-off, an additional specific reserve or
charge-off is taken on the related credit. Partially charged-off loans are not
written back up based on updated appraisals and always remain on non-accrual
with any and all subsequent payments applied to the remaining balance of the
loan as principal reductions. No interest income is recognized on loans that
have been partially charged-off.
The
Company generally follows a policy of not extending maturities on loans under
existing terms. The Company may extend the maturity of a loan, but not at the
original terms. While the Company may consider the existence of
guarantees when deciding to extend the maturity of a loan, the Company looks
primarily to the value of the collateral and/or the cash flows from the
underlying project. No loans are extended due solely to the existence
of a guarantee. As a general matter, the Company does not view
extension of a loan to be a satisfactory approach to resolving non-performing
credits. No commercial loans have had their maturity dates extended under
the original terms of their loans. Maturity dates may be extended under
new market terms that clearly place the Company in a more advantageous position
to increase or assure full collection of the loan under the new contractual
terms. These new terms may incorporate, but are not limited to
additional assignment of collateral, significant balance
curtailments/liquidations and assignments of additional project cash
flows. Guarantees may be a consideration in the extension of loan
maturities, but the Company does not extend loans based solely on
guarantees.
Collateral
values or estimates of discounted cash flows (inclusive of any potential cash
flow from guarantees) are evaluated to estimate the probability and severity of
potential losses. Then a specific amount of impairment is established
based on the Company’s calculation of the probable loss inherent in the
individual loan. The actual occurrence and severity of losses involving impaired
credits can differ substantially from estimates.
Management
believes that it uses relevant information available to make determinations
about impairment in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States (“US GAAP”). However, the determination of impairment requires
significant judgment, and estimates of probable losses in the loan and lease
portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. In
addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination
process, and independent consultants engaged by the Company, periodically review
the loan and lease portfolio. These reviews may result in additional
loans being considered impaired based on management’s judgments of information
available at the time of each examination.
The
Company makes provisions for loan and lease losses in amounts necessary to
maintain the allowance at an appropriate level, as established by use of the
allowance methodology. Further discussion and information regarding
the allowance for loan and leases losses methodology may be found on page 25 in
the Critical Accounting Policies section. Provisions amounted to
$23.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $55.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Net charge-offs for the
same periods in 2010 and 2009 were $20.9 million and $43.3 million,
respectively. This resulted in a ratio of annualized net
charge-offs to average loans and leases of 1.24% for the first nine months of
2010 as compared to 2.38% for the first nine months of 2009. At
September 30, 2010, the allowance for loan and lease losses was $67.3 million,
or 3.08% of total loans and leases, compared to $62.9 million, or 2.70% of total
loans and leases, at December 31, 2009.
32
Management
believes that the allowance is adequate. However, its determination requires
significant judgment, and estimates of probable losses in the loan and lease
portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually
observed. While management uses available information to recognize
probable losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on
changes in the credits comprising the portfolio and changes in the financial
condition of borrowers, such as may result from changes in economic conditions.
In addition, federal and state regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their
examination process, and independent consultants engaged by the Bank,
periodically review the loan and lease portfolio and the
allowance. Such reviews may result in adjustments to the provision
based upon their analysis of the information available at the time of each
examination.
During
2010, there were no major changes in estimation methods that affected the
allowance methodology from the prior year. Variations can occur
over time in the methodology’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance as a
result of the credit performance of borrowers. There was no
unallocated allowance at September 30, 2010 or year-end 2009.
At
September 30, 2010, total non-performing loans and leases were $93.3 million, or
4.27% of total loans and leases, compared to $133.7 million, or 5.82% of total
loans and leases, at December 31, 2009. The decrease in
non-performing loans and leases was due primarily to a decrease of $37.3 million
in nonaccrual loans and leases. Timely aggressive recognition and
management of problem credits has significantly slowed the migration of these
loans into non-accrual status during this period. The decrease in
non-performing loans was due in large part to a decrease of $29.4 million in
balances relating to six commercial relationships which included net charge-offs
of $9.3 million and payments of $20.1 million. These relationships encompass 24
loans in the commercial construction, commercial real estate and commercial
business loan categories. None of these loans have had their maturities extended
or their terms restructured since origination. Credit issues for home builders
have been identified, workout strategies have been developed and the Company
continues to monitor the performance of the underlying collateral, update
appraisals, as necessary, given the context of market environment
expectations. The allowance represented 72% of non-performing loans
and leases at September 30, 2010 and 48% at December 31, 2009. The
movement in the coverage ratio demonstrates the improvement in the allowance
position. This increase in the coverage ratio is the direct
result of a declining level of non-performing loans together with an increased
allowance. An analysis of the actual loss history on the
problem credits in 2009 and for the first nine months of 2010 provided an
indication that the coverage of the inherent losses on the problem credits was
adequate. The Company continues to monitor the impact of the economic conditions
on our commercial customers, the reduced inflow of non-accruals, lower inflow in
criticized loan and the significant decline in early stage
delinquencies. The improvement in these credit metrics support
management’s outlook for continued improved credit quality
performance.
The
balance of impaired loans was $74.3 million, with specific reserves of $10.6
million against those loans at September 30, 2010, as compared to $99.5 with
reserves of $6.6 million, at December 31, 2009. The increase in
specific reserves during this period of time was the direct result of a few
commercial loan credits that continued to experience difficulty and collateral
value erosion
33
Nine Months Ended
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||
Balance,
January 1
|
$ | 64,559 | $ | 50,526 | ||||
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
23,585 | 76,762 | ||||||
Loan
charge-offs:
|
||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
(4,880 | ) | (4,847 | ) | ||||
Commercial
loans and leases
|
(16,255 | ) | (57,098 | ) | ||||
Consumer
|
(2,834 | ) | (1,575 | ) | ||||
Total
charge-offs
|
(23,969 | ) | (63,520 | ) | ||||
Loan
recoveries:
|
||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
32 | 41 | ||||||
Commercial
loans and leases
|
2,902 | 640 | ||||||
Consumer
|
173 | 110 | ||||||
Total
recoveries
|
3,107 | 791 | ||||||
Net
charge-offs
|
(20,862 | ) | (62,729 | ) | ||||
Balance,
period end
|
$ | 67,282 | $ | 64,559 | ||||
Annualized
net charge-offs to average loans and leases
|
1.24 | % | 2.61 | % | ||||
Allowance
to total loans and leases
|
3.08 | % | 2.81 | % |
Table
7 – Analysis of Credit Risk
(Dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||
Non-accrual
loans and leases
|
||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
$ | 5,674 | $ | 9,520 | ||||
Commercial
loans and leases
|
68,182 | 100,894 | ||||||
Consumer
|
20 | 766 | ||||||
Total
non-accrual loans and leases
|
73,876 | 111,180 | ||||||
Loans
and leases 90 days past due
|
||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
15,992 | 14,887 | ||||||
Commercial
loans and leases
|
1,726 | 3,321 | ||||||
Consumer
|
550 | 793 | ||||||
Total
90 days past due loans and leases
|
18,268 | 19,001 | ||||||
Restructured
loans and leases
|
1,199 | 3,549 | ||||||
Total
non-performing loans and leases
|
93,343 | 133,730 | ||||||
Other
real estate owned, net
|
10,011 | 7,464 | ||||||
Other
assets owned
|
200 | - | ||||||
Total
non-performing assets
|
$ | 103,554 | $ | 141,194 | ||||
Non-performing
loans to total loans and leases
|
4.27 | % | 5.82 | % | ||||
Non-performing
assets to total assets
|
2.87 | % | 3.89 | % | ||||
Allowance
for loan and leases to non-performing loans and leases
|
72.08 | % | 48.28 | % |
34
Market
Risk Management
The
Company's net income is largely dependent on its net interest
income. Net interest income is susceptible to interest rate risk to
the extent that interest-bearing liabilities mature or re-price on a different
basis than interest-earning assets. When interest-bearing liabilities
mature or re-price more quickly than interest-earning assets in a given period,
a significant increase in market rates of interest could adversely affect net
interest income. Similarly, when interest-earning assets mature or
re-price more quickly than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates
could result in a decrease in net interest income. Net interest income is also
affected by changes in the portion of interest-earning assets that are funded by
interest-bearing liabilities rather than by other sources of funds, such as
noninterest-bearing deposits and stockholders' equity.
The
Company’s interest rate risk management goals are (1) to increase net interest
income at a growth rate consistent with the growth rate of total assets, and (2)
to minimize fluctuations in net interest margin as a percentage of earning
assets. Management attempts to achieve these goals by balancing,
within policy limits, the volume of floating-rate liabilities with a similar
volume of floating-rate assets; by keeping the average maturity of fixed-rate
asset and liability contracts reasonably matched; by maintaining a pool of
administered core deposits; and by adjusting pricing rates to market conditions
on a continuing basis.
The
Company has established a comprehensive interest rate risk management policy,
which is administered by management’s ALCO. The policy establishes limits on
risk, which are quantitative measures of the percentage change in net interest
income (a measure of net interest income at risk) and the fair value of equity
capital (a measure of economic value of equity or “EVE” at risk) resulting from
a hypothetical change in U.S. Treasury interest rates for maturities from one
day to thirty years. The Company measures the potential adverse impacts that
changing interest rates may have on its short-term earnings, long-term value,
and liquidity by employing simulation analysis through the use of computer
modeling. The simulation model captures optionality factors such as call
features and interest rate caps and floors imbedded in investment and loan
portfolio contracts. As with any method of gauging interest rate risk, there are
certain shortcomings inherent in the interest rate modeling methodology used by
the Company. When interest rates change, actual movements in different
categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, loan
prepayments, and withdrawals of time and other deposits, may deviate
significantly from assumptions used in the model. Finally, the methodology does
not measure or reflect the impact that higher rates may have on adjustable-rate
loan customers’ ability to service their debts, or the impact of rate changes or
demand for loan, lease, and deposit products.
The
Company prepares a current base case and eight alternative simulations at least
once a quarter, and reports the analysis to the board of
directors. In addition, more frequent forecasts are produced when
interest rates are particularly uncertain or when other business conditions so
dictate.
The
statement of condition is subject to quarterly testing for eight alternative
interest rate shock possibilities to indicate the inherent interest rate
risk. Average interest rates are shocked by +/- 100, 200, 300, and
400 basis points (“bp”), although the Company may elect not to use particular
scenarios that it determines are impractical in a current rate
environment. It is management’s goal to structure the balance sheet
so that net interest earnings at risk over a twelve-month period and the
economic value of equity at risk do not exceed policy guidelines at the various
interest rate shock levels.
The
Company augments its quarterly interest rate shock analysis with alternative
external interest rate scenarios on a monthly basis. These alternative interest
rate scenarios may include non-parallel rate ramps and non-parallel yield curve
twists. If a measure of risk produced by the alternative simulations
of the entire balance sheet violates policy guidelines, ALCO is required to
develop a plan to restore the measure of risk to a level that complies with
policy limits within two quarters.
Measures
of net interest income at risk produced by simulation analysis are indicators of
an institution’s short-term performance in alternative rate
environments. These measures are typically based upon a relatively
brief period, usually one year. They do not necessarily indicate the
long-term prospects or economic value of the institution.
Table
8 - Estimated Changes in Net Interest Income
Change in Interest Rates:
|
+ 400 | bp | + 300 | bp | + 200 | bp | + 100 | bp | - 100 | bp | - 200 | bp | -300 | bp | -400 | bp | ||||||||
Policy Limit
|
23.50 | % | 17.50 | % | 15.00 | % | 10.00 | % | 10.00 | % | 15.00 | % | 17.50 | % | 23.50 | % | ||||||||
September
30, 2010
|
(3.73 | )% | 0.29 | % | 3.62 | % | 0.84 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
(15.27 | )% | (9.52 | )% | (5.03 | )% | (1.71 | )% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
As shown
above, measures of net interest income at risk decreased from December 31, 2009
at all interest rate shock levels. All measures remained well within
prescribed policy limits.
The risk
position decreased significantly in the rising rate scenarios due to an increase
in interest-bearing deposits with banks which resulted from the proceeds from
the Company’s recent common stock offering. This caused an increase in the
Company’s asset sensitivity which would produce an increase in net interest
income in a rising rate environment.
35
The
measures of equity value at risk indicate the ongoing economic value of the
Company by considering the effects of changes in interest rates on all of the
Company’s cash flows, and by discounting the cash flows to estimate the present
value of assets and liabilities. The difference between these
discounted values of the assets and liabilities is the economic value of equity,
which, in theory, approximates the fair value of the Company’s net
assets.
Table
9 - Estimated Changes in Economic Value of Equity (EVE)
Estimated
Changes in Economic Value of Equity (EVE)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in Interest Rates:
|
+ 400 | bp | + 300 | bp | + 200 | bp | + 100 | bp | - 100 | bp | - 200 | bp | -300 | bp | -400 | bp | ||||||||
Policy Limit
|
35.00 | % | 25.00 | % | 20.00 | % | 10.00 | % | 10.00 | % | 20.00 | % | 25.00 | % | 35.00 | % | ||||||||
September
30, 2010
|
(8.64 | )% | (6.47 | )% | (2.58 | )% | 0.50 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
(23.29 | )% | (12.78 | )% | (7.43 | )% | (2.29 | )% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Measures
of the economic value of equity (EVE) at risk decreased from year-end 2009 in
all interest rate shock levels. The economic value of equity exposure at +200 bp
is now -2.58% compared to -7.43% at year-end 2009, and is well within the policy
limit of 20.0%, as are measures at all other shock levels.
The
increase in EVE is due primarily to an increase in the projected duration with
respect to interest-bearing deposit accounts. This longer duration has produced
an increase in the estimated core deposit premium.
Liquidity
Management
Liquidity
is measured by a financial institution's ability to raise funds through loan and
lease repayments, maturing investments, deposit growth, borrowed funds, capital
and the sale of highly marketable assets such as investment securities and
residential mortgage loans. The Company's liquidity position, considering both
internal and external sources available, exceeded anticipated short-term and
long-term needs at September 30, 2010. Management considers core
deposits, defined to include all deposits other than time deposits of $100
thousand or more, to be a relatively stable funding source. Core deposits
equaled 69% of total earning assets at September 30, 2010. In
addition, loan and lease payments, maturities, calls and pay downs of
securities, deposit growth and earnings contribute a flow of funds available to
meet liquidity requirements. In assessing liquidity, management considers
operating requirements, the seasonality of deposit flows, investment, loan and
deposit maturities and calls, expected funding of loans and deposit withdrawals,
and the market values of available-for-sale investments, so that sufficient
funds are available on short notice to meet obligations as they arise and to
ensure that the Company is able to pursue new business
opportunities.
Liquidity
is measured using an approach designed to take into account, in addition to
factors already discussed above, the Company’s growth and mortgage banking
activities. Also considered are changes in the liquidity of the
investment portfolio due to fluctuations in interest rates. Under
this approach, implemented by the Funds Management Subcommittee of ALCO under
formal policy guidelines, the Company’s liquidity position is measured weekly,
looking forward at thirty day intervals from thirty (30) to three hundred sixty
(360) days. The measurement is based upon the projection of funds
sold or purchased position, along with ratios and trends developed to measure
dependence on purchased funds and core growth. Resulting projections
as of September 30, 2010, show short-term investments exceeding short-term
borrowings by $52.5 million over the subsequent 360 days. This
projected excess of liquidity versus requirements provides the Company with
flexibility in how it funds loans and other earning assets.
The
Company also has external sources of funds, which can be drawn upon when
required. The main sources of external liquidity are available lines
of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and the Federal Reserve.
The line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta totaled $1.1
billion, of which $552.8 million was available for borrowing based on pledged
collateral, with $409.3 million borrowed against it as of September 30, 2010.
The line of credit at the Federal Reserve totaled $266.7 million, all of which
was available for borrowing based on pledged collateral, with no borrowings
against it as of September 30, 2010. Other external sources of
liquidity available to the Company in the form of unsecured lines of credit
granted by correspondent banks totaled $35.0 million at September 30, 2010,
against which there were no outstanding borrowings. In addition, the
Company had a secured line of credit with a correspondent bank of $20.0 million
as of September 30, 2010 against which there were no outstanding borrowings. The
Company’s total borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2010 were not materially
different from the amounts outstanding at any time during the three and nine
month periods then ended. Based upon its liquidity analysis,
including external sources of liquidity available, management believes the
liquidity position was appropriate at September 30, 2010.
The
parent company (“Bancorp”) is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must
provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its operating expenses, Bancorp is
responsible for paying any dividends declared to its common shareholders,
dividends on its preferred stock, and interest and principal on outstanding
debt. Bancorp’s primary source of income is dividends received from the Bank.
The amount of dividends that the Bank may declare and pay to Bancorp in any
calendar year, without the receipt of prior approval from the Federal Reserve,
cannot exceed net income for that year to date plus retained net income (as
defined) for the preceding two calendar years. At September 30, 2010, Bancorp
had liquid assets of $54.0 million.
36
Arrangements
to fund credit products or guarantee financing take the form of loans
commitments (including lines of credit on revolving credit structures) and
letters of credit. Approvals for these arrangements are obtained in
the same manner as loans. Generally, cash flows, collateral value and
risk assessment are considered when determining the amount and structure of
credit arrangements. Commitments to extend credit in the form of
consumer, commercial real estate and business at September 30, 2010 were as
follows:
Table
10 – Commitments to Extend Credit
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 65,103 | $ | 47,541 | ||||
Real
estate-development and construction
|
51,646 | 51,288 | ||||||
Real
estate-residential mortgage
|
50,620 | 18,416 | ||||||
Lines
of credit, principally home equity and business lines
|
606,177 | 587,174 | ||||||
Standby
letters of credit
|
64,323 | 65,242 | ||||||
Total
Commitments to extend credit and available credit lines
|
$ | 837,869 | $ | 769,661 |
Historically,
many of the commitments expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements.
B.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009
Overview
Net
income available to common stockholders for Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the first nine months of 2010 totaled $10.8 million ($0.49 per
diluted share) compared to a net loss available to common stockholders of $15.2
million (($0.93) per diluted share) for the first nine months of 2009. These
results reflect the following events:
|
·
|
A
14% increase in net interest income as the net interest margin increased
to 3.59% in 2010 from 3.25% in 2009. A decrease in funding
costs due to the decline in rates paid on deposits and borrowings exceeded
the effect of decreased yields on interest-earning assets in the first
nine months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of
2009.
|
|
·
|
The
provision for loan and lease losses decreased significantly for the first
nine months of 2010 compared to the prior year period. This was largely
due to net loan and lease charge-offs which totaled $20.9 million for the
first nine months of 2010 compared to $43.3 million for the first nine
months of 2009.
|
|
·
|
Non-interest
income remained relatively even with the prior year period due to
increases in fees on sales of investment products and trust and investment
management fees which largely offset a decrease in service charges on
deposit accounts.
|
|
·
|
Non-interest
expenses decreased 1% compared to the prior year period. This included
decreases in FDIC insurance expense and intangibles amortization which
were partially offset by an increase in other non-interest expenses over
the prior year period.
|
The
national and regional economies reflected a very slow and uneven economic
recovery during the first nine months of 2010. While the regional economy in
which the Company operates has begun to stabilize with respect to the real
estate market and unemployment, these forces continue to present challenges to
the Company. Through deployment of experienced staff and sophisticated reporting
tools, the Bank took timely and aggressive action to identify early in the
credit cycle and effectively manage resolution of its problem credits. This has
enabled the Bank to minimize losses on such loans. At September 30, 2010,
nonperforming assets totaled $103.6 million compared to $150.2 million at
September 30, 2009. This decrease was due primarily to a decline in
non-performing commercial loans and leases resulting from significant payments
received on several problem credits and charge-offs. The Bank has
worked to quickly and aggressively address developing trends in these loan
portfolios with the goal of minimizing any resulting losses.
The net
interest margin increased to 3.59% in the first nine months of 2010 compared to
3.25% in 2009 as market rates have continued at low levels. This increase in the
margin was due primarily to a decrease of 80 basis points in the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities primarily due to effective management of the
interest rates paid on deposits. This more than offset a decline of 31 basis
points in the yield on interest-earning assets as the loan portfolio continued
to decrease due to weak customer demand.
Lastly,
but as important, is capital adequacy. The Company’s regulatory capital ratios
decreased compared to the prior quarter due primarily to repurchase during the
second quarter of half of the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under
the TARP Capital Purchase Program. This decrease was partially offset by the
Company’s profitability during the first nine months of 2010 and the decline in
the commercial loan portfolio.
37
Table
11 – Consolidated Average Balances, Yields and Rates
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized
|
Annualized
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
(1)
|
Average
|
Average
|
(1)
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands and tax-equivalent)
|
Balances
|
Interest
|
Yield/Rate
|
Balances
|
Interest
|
Yield/Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage
loans (2)
|
$ | 465,393 | $ | 18,989 | 5.44 | % | $ | 473,406 | $ | 21,020 | 5.92 | % | ||||||||||||
Residential
construction loans
|
87,616 | 3,044 | 4.65 | 150,345 | 5,833 | 5.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
mortgage loans
|
895,049 | 40,459 | 6.04 | 863,028 | 39,780 | 6.16 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction loans
|
114,450 | 2,657 | 3.10 | 210,594 | 4,712 | 2.99 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
business loans and leases
|
294,506 | 11,434 | 5.19 | 342,691 | 13,866 | 5.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
loans
|
395,835 | 11,480 | 3.90 | 406,299 | 12,022 | 3.97 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans and
leases (3)
|
2,252,849 | 88,063 | 5.22 | 2,446,363 | 97,233 | 5.31 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxable
securities
|
855,243 | 19,227 | 3.02 | 598,223 | 13,673 | 3.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt securities
(4)
|
159,281 | 8,269 | 6.92 | 158,716 | 9,023 | 7.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits with banks
|
83,351 | 158 | 0.25 | 57,864 | 112 | 0.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
1,814 | 2 | 0.17 | 2,207 | 3 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
3,352,538 | 115,719 | 4.61 | 3,263,373 | 120,044 | 4.92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: allowance
for loan and lease losses
|
(70,145 | ) | (58,231 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
44,633 | 45,170 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
48,876 | 50,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
243,100 | 217,214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 3,619,002 | $ | 3,518,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 288,637 | 256 | 0.12 | % | $ | 251,257 | 326 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||||||
Regular
savings deposits
|
163,687 | 128 | 0.10 | 151,942 | 177 | 0.16 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market savings deposits
|
892,838 | 4,006 | 0.60 | 809,442 | 8,690 | 1.44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
727,980 | 9,351 | 1.72 | 833,955 | 18,925 | 3.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing deposits
|
2,073,142 | 13,741 | 0.89 | 2,046,596 | 28,118 | 1.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
87,881 | 198 | 0.30 | 86,612 | 225 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances
from FHLB
|
410,523 | 10,949 | 3.57 | 412,195 | 11,005 | 3.57 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated
debentures
|
35,000 | 693 | 2.64 | 35,000 | 1,358 | 5.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
2,606,546 | 25,581 | 1.31 | 2,580,403 | 40,706 | 2.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
546,961 | 512,384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
26,006 | 33,494 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
439,489 | 392,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 3,619,002 | $ | 3,518,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income and spread
|
$ | 90,138 | 3.30 | % | $ | 79,338 | 2.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Less:
tax-equivalent adjustment
|
3,484 | 3,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 86,654 | $ | 75,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income/earning assets
|
4.61 | % | 4.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense/earning assets
|
1.02 | 1.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
3.59 | % | 3.25 | % |
(1)
Tax-equivalent income has been adjusted using the combined marginal federal and
state rate of 39.88% for 2010 and 2009. The annualized
taxable-equivalent adjustments utilized in the above
table to compute yields aggregated to $3.5 million and $3.5 million in 2010 and
2009, respectively.
(2)
Includes residential mortgage loans held for sale. Home equity loans and lines
are classified as consumer loans.
(3)
Non-accrual loans are included in the average balances.
(4)
Includes only investments that are exempt from federal taxes.
38
Net
Interest Income
The
largest source of the Company’s operating revenue is net interest income, which
is the difference between the interest earned on interest-earning assets and the
interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
Net
interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $86.7 million
compared to $75.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an
increase of $10.8 million or 14%.
For
purposes of this discussion and analysis, the interest earned on tax-exempt
investment securities has been adjusted to an amount comparable to interest
subject to normal income taxes. The result is referred to as tax-equivalent
interest income and tax-equivalent net interest income.
Table 11
provides an analysis of net interest income performance that reflects an
increase in the net interest margin for the first nine months of 2010 of 34
basis points when compared to the first nine months of 2009. Average
interest-earning assets increased by 3% from 2009 to 2010. Table 12
shows the extent to which interest income, interest expense and net interest
income were affected by rate and volume changes. The increase in
tax-equivalent net interest margin in 2010 was the combined result of a decrease
in interest expense due to declining rates on deposits resulting from a
combination of rate management and current market conditions and the reduced
impact of non-accrual loans on interest income on loans. These lower deposit
costs were somewhat offset by lower rates on average interest-earning assets due
to the decrease in loans and comparatively lower yields on a higher balance of
investment securities. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased $35
million or 7% in 2010 while the percentage of noninterest-bearing deposits to
total deposits increased to 21% for the first nine months of 2010 compared to
20% for the prior year period.
Table
12– Effect of Volume and Rate Changes on Net Interest Income
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 vs. 2009
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Or
|
Due to Change In Average:*
|
Or
|
Due to Change In Average:*
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands and tax equivalent)
|
(Decrease)
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
(Decrease)
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income from earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
and leases
|
$ | (9,170 | ) | $ | (7,598 | ) | $ | (1,572 | ) | $ | (15,513 | ) | $ | 2,410 | $ | (17,923 | ) | |||||||
Securities
|
4,800 | 7,165 | (2,365 | ) | 4,854 | 10,891 | (6,037 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other
earning assets
|
45 | 48 | (3 | ) | (493 | ) | 302 | (795 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
(4,325 | ) | (385 | ) | (3,940 | ) | (11,152 | ) | 13,603 | (24,755 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest
expense on funding of earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
(70 | ) | 40 | (110 | ) | (202 | ) | 13 | (215 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Regular
savings deposits
|
(49 | ) | 14 | (63 | ) | (188 | ) | (10 | ) | (178 | ) | |||||||||||||
Money
market savings deposits
|
(4,684 | ) | 824 | (5,508 | ) | (1,070 | ) | 1,651 | (2,721 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
(9,574 | ) | (2,171 | ) | (7,403 | ) | (3,352 | ) | 1,980 | (5,332 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total
borrowings
|
(748 | ) | (9 | ) | (739 | ) | (512 | ) | 887 | (1,399 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
(15,125 | ) | (1,302 | ) | (13,823 | ) | (5,324 | ) | 4,521 | (9,845 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 10,800 | $ | 917 | $ | 9,883 | $ | (5,828 | ) | $ | 9,082 | $ | (14,910 | ) |
*
Variances that are the combined effect of volume and rate, but cannot be
separately identified, are allocated to the volume and rate variances
based on their respective relative amounts.
Interest
Income
The
Company's interest income, excluding the adjustment for tax-equivalent income,
decreased by $4.3 million or 4% for the first nine months of 2010, compared to
the first nine months of 2009. The decrease in interest income in 2010 resulted
primarily from a migration of assets from higher-yielding loans to lower
yielding investment securities.
During
the first nine months of 2010, average loans and leases, had a yield of 5.22%
versus 5.31% for the prior year period and declined $193.5 million or 8%.
Average residential real estate loans decreased 10% due mainly to a 42% decrease
in average residential construction loans while the average total commercial
loan and lease portfolio decreased 8% due largely to a 46% decrease in
commercial construction loans. Average consumer loans decreased 3% due to a
decline in average installment loans. During the first nine months of 2010,
average loans and leases comprised 67% of average earning assets, compared to
75% for the first nine months of 2009. Average total securities, yielding 3.63%
for the first nine months of 2010 versus 4.02% in the prior year period,
increased 34% to $1,014.5 million. Average tax-exempt securities remained
virtually level compared to 2009. Average total securities comprised 30% of
average earning assets in the first nine months of 2010, compared to 23% in the
first nine months of 2009. This growth in investment securities compared to the
first nine months of the prior year was due mainly to the Company’s ability to
retain a significant share of the growth in deposits during 2009 and the decline
in loans due to soft loan demand and higher charge-offs.
39
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense decreased by 37% or $15.1 million in the first nine months of 2010,
compared to the first nine months of 2009, primarily as a result of an 80 basis
point decrease in the average rate paid on deposits and borrowings which
decreased to 1.31% from 2.11%.
Deposit
activity during the first nine months of 2010 has continued to be driven
primarily by a very slow and uneven economic recovery at both the national and
regional levels together with a general “flight to safety” by consumers in the
face of erratic movements in both the international and national equity markets
and historically low interest rates. The Company has been generally successful
in retaining much of the deposit growth realized in 2009 from its campaign to
increase its deposit market share. In an effort to preserve liquidity levels
while continuing to improve its net interest margin, the Company has worked to
retain such deposits at lower, although competitive, rates. This effort is
reflected in the decrease in average rates on money market deposits from 1.44%
in the first nine months of 2009 to 0.60% in the first nine months of 2010. Due
largely to continued competition in the deposit marketplace and consumers desire
to keep deposit durations very short due to the low rates mentioned above, the
Company has seen a 13% decline in the average balances of certificates of
deposit accounts in the current year first nine months compared to the prior
year period.
Table
13 – Non-interest income
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
2010/2009
|
2010/2009
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||
Securities
gains
|
$ | 323 | $ | 207 | $ | 116 | 56.0 | % | ||||||||
Total
other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") losses
|
(1,168 | ) | - | (1,168 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Portion
of OTTI losses recognized in other comprehensive income before
taxes
|
699 | - | 699 | - | ||||||||||||
Net
OTTI recognized in earnings
|
(469 | ) | - | (469 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
7,984 | 8,537 | (553 | ) | (6.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Gains
on sales of mortgage loans
|
2,544 | 2,819 | (275 | ) | (9.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Fees
on sales of investment products
|
2,464 | 2,062 | 402 | 19.5 | ||||||||||||
Trust
and investment management fees
|
7,488 | 7,063 | 425 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Insurance
agency commissions
|
3,895 | 4,138 | (243 | ) | (5.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Income
from bank owned life insurance
|
2,105 | 2,176 | (71 | ) | (3.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Visa
check fees
|
2,438 | 2,144 | 294 | 13.7 | ||||||||||||
Other
income
|
5,175 | 4,520 | 655 | 14.5 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
$ | 33,947 | $ | 33,666 | $ | 281 | 0.8 |
Non-interest
Income
Total
non-interest income was $33.9 million for the nine month period ended September
30, 2010, a $0.2 million or 1% increase from the same period from 2009. This
increase in non-interest income for the first nine months of 2010 was due
primarily to higher fees on sales of investment products due to growth in sales
of financial products together with growth in trust and investment management
fees which increased 6% over the prior year period due to increased average
assets under management. Visa check fees increased 14% due to a higher volume of
electronic transactions and other non-interest income also increased 14% due to
higher market adjustments associated with commercial loan swaps and increased
accrued gains on mortgage commitments. These increases were largely
offset by a 6% decline in service charges on deposit accounts due to lower
return check charges.
40
Table
14 – Non-interest Expense
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
2010/2009
|
2010/2009
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
$ | 41,393 | $ | 41,319 | $ | 74 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy
expense of premises
|
8,625 | 8,008 | 617 | 7.7 | ||||||||||||
Equipment
expenses
|
3,655 | 4,332 | (677 | ) | (15.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Marketing
|
1,678 | 1,389 | 289 | 20.8 | ||||||||||||
Outside
data services
|
3,007 | 2,754 | 253 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||
FDIC
insurance
|
3,383 | 4,968 | (1,585 | ) | (31.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
1,487 | 3,150 | (1,663 | ) | (52.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
expenses
|
13,370 | 11,755 | 1,615 | 13.7 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
$ | 76,598 | $ | 77,675 | $ | (1,077 | ) | (1.4 | ) |
Non-interest
Expense
Non-interest
expenses totaled $76.6 million for the nine month period ended September 30,
2010, a 1% increase over the same period in 2009. Other non-interest expenses
increased 14% over the first nine months of 2009 due primarily to higher
mark-to-market adjustments related to commercial loan swaps and accrued losses
on mortgage commitments while marketing expenses also increased 21% due to
higher advertising costs. Outside data services increased 9% compared to the
prior year period due primarily to costs associated with the issuance of new
Visa debit cards. Salaries and benefits expenses remained virtually level with
the prior year period while occupancy expenses increased 8% due to increased
grounds maintenance resulting from snow removal costs. These increases were
offset by a decrease in FDIC insurance expense due to a $1.7 million one time
assessment by the FDIC in the second quarter of 2009. In addition, intangibles
amortization decreased 53% due to certain intangibles from branch acquisitions
that had fully amortized as of September, 2009. Equipment expenses decreased 16%
due primarily to lower depreciation expense.
Income
Taxes
Income
tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $5.2 million
compared to a tax benefit of $12.2 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009. On an absolute rate change basis, the Company’s effective
tax rate on income before taxes decreased to 25% for the first nine months of
2010 compared to a 51% tax benefit on a loss before income taxes for the first
nine months of 2009. This disproportionate change in the effective tax rate was
caused by the much higher level of tax-advantaged income in proportion to the
respective net income (loss) before taxes for each respective nine month
period. Tax-advantaged income is derived from certain investment
securities and bank owned life insurance in 2010 whose income may be partially
or wholly exempt from taxes.
Preferred
Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
Preferred
stock dividends and discount accretion increased to $4.5 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 from $3.6 million for the prior year period.
This increase was primarily due to accelerated accretion of $1.3 million
recognized in the third quarter of 2010 due to the repayment of one half of the
preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase
Program which was somewhat offset by reduced dividends on the preferred stock
due to the above repayment.
C.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For
the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Quarter Ended September 30,
2009
Net
income available to common stockholders for the third quarter of 2010 totaled
$6.4 million ($0.27 per diluted share) compared to a net loss available to
common stockholders of $14.8 million (($0.90) per diluted share) for the third
quarter of 2009.
Net
interest income increased by $3.1 million, or 12%, to $29.5 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010, while total non-interest income increased
by $0.1 million, or 1% for the period. Non-interest expenses decreased $1.2
million or 5% for the quarter.
The
increase in net interest income was due to a decline of 69 basis points on
interest-bearing liabilities which far exceeded a decrease of 20 basis points on
interest-earning assets. The primary driver in this improvement to the Company’s
net interest income was the decline in the cost of deposits which decreased by
87 basis points compared to the prior year period. This was due to effective
interest rate management and declining market rates resulting from a general
“flight to safety” by investors as a result of volatile market conditions and a
struggling economic recovery. These factors produced a net interest
margin increase of 37 basis points to 3.64% for the three months ended September
30, 2010, from 3.27% for the same period of 2009.
The
provision for loan and lease losses totaled $2.5 million for the third quarter
of 2010 compared to $34.5 million for the same period of 2009. This decrease was
due to a decline in non-performing assets from $150.2 million at September 30,
2009 to $103.2 million at September 30, 2010 while net charge-offs during the
third quarter of 2010 decreased to $6.5 million from $29.8 million for the same
quarter of 2009.
41
Table
15 – Non-interest Income
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
2010/2009
|
2010/2009
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||
Securities
gains
|
$ | 25 | $ | 15 | $ | 10 | - | % | ||||||||
Total
other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") losses
|
(334 | ) | - | (334 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Portion
of OTTI losses recognized in other comprehensive income before
taxes
|
(46 | ) | - | (46 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Net
OTTI recognized in earnings
|
(380 | ) | - | (380 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
2,567 | 2,823 | (256 | ) | (9.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Gains
on sales of mortgage loans
|
915 | 1,011 | (96 | ) | (9.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Fees
on sales of investment products
|
782 | 740 | 42 | 5.7 | ||||||||||||
Trust
and investment management fees
|
2,505 | 2,406 | 99 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||
Insurance
agency commissions
|
978 | 1,048 | (70 | ) | (6.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Income
from bank owned life insurance
|
709 | 740 | (31 | ) | (4.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Visa
check fees
|
843 | 758 | 85 | 11.2 | ||||||||||||
Other
income
|
1,794 | 1,121 | 673 | 60.0 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
$ | 10,738 | $ | 10,662 | $ | 76 | 0.7 |
Non-interest
income remained virtually level at $10.7 million for the third quarter of 2010
compared to the third quarter of 2009. Other non-interest income
increased 60% due largely to higher accrued gains on mortgage commitments. Trust
and investment management fees increased 4% due to increased assets under
management while Visa check fees increased 11% due to a higher volume of
electronic transactions. These increases were largely offset by decreases of 9%
in service charges on deposits due primarily to a decline in return check
charges. Gains on sales of mortgage loans decreased 10% due to lower mortgage
loan origination volumes.
Table
16 – Non-interest Expense
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
2010/2009
|
2010/2009
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
$ | 13,841 | $ | 14,411 | $ | (570 | ) | (4.0 | )% | |||||||
Occupancy
expense of premises
|
2,826 | 2,685 | 141 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||
Equipment
expenses
|
1,137 | 1,444 | (307 | ) | (21.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Marketing
|
589 | 484 | 105 | 21.7 | ||||||||||||
Outside
data services
|
966 | 987 | (21 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||||||||
FDIC
insurance
|
1,056 | 1,219 | (163 | ) | (13.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
495 | 1,048 | (553 | ) | (52.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
expenses
|
4,429 | 4,289 | 140 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
$ | 25,339 | $ | 26,567 | $ | (1,228 | ) | (4.6 | ) |
Non-interest
expenses totaled $25.3 million for the third quarter of 2010, a decrease of 5%
compared to the third quarter of 2009. This decrease was due in large part to a
decrease of 13% in FDIC insurance expense resulting primarily from a decline in
deposit balances. Intangibles amortization decreased 53% compared to the prior
year period due to intangibles from branch acquisitions that had fully amortized
during the third quarter of 2009. Salaries and benefits expenses decreased 4%
due mainly to lower health plan expenses and a decline in stock compensation
expense. Equipment expense also declined 21% due largely to a 25% decrease in
depreciation expense. These decreases were somewhat offset by an increase in
other non-interest expenses of 3% due primarily to higher accrued expenses on
mortgage commitments. In addition, marketing expense increased 22% compared to
the prior year quarter due to higher advertising costs.
Income
Taxes
Income
tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $4.0 million
compared to a tax benefit of $10.4 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009. On an absolute rate change basis, the Company’s effective
tax rate on income before taxes decreased to 32% for the third quarter of 2010
compared to a 43% tax benefit on a loss before income taxes for the third
quarter of 2009. This disproportionate change in the effective tax rate was
caused by the much higher level of tax-advantaged income in proportion to the
respective net income (loss) before taxes for each respective nine month
period. Tax-advantaged income is derived from certain investment
securities and bank owned life insurance in 2010 whose income may be partially
or wholly exempt from taxes.
42
Preferred
Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
Preferred
stock dividends and discount accretion increased to $2.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 from $1.2 million for the prior year period.
This increase was primarily due to accelerated accretion of $1.3 million
recognized in the third quarter of 2010 due to the repayment of one half of the
preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase
Program which was somewhat offset by reduced dividends on the preferred stock
due to the above repayment.
Operating
Expense Performance
Management
views the efficiency ratio as an important measure of expense performance and
cost management. The ratio expresses the level of non-interest
expenses as a percentage of total revenue (net interest income plus total
non-interest income). This is a GAAP financial
measure. Lower ratios indicate improved productivity.
Non-GAAP
Financial Measure
The
Company has for many years used a traditional efficiency ratio that is a
non-GAAP financial measure of operating expense control and efficiency of
operations. Management believes that its traditional ratio better
focuses attention on the operating performance of the Company over time than
does a GAAP ratio, and is highly useful in comparing period-to-period operating
performance of the Company’s core business operations. It is used by
management as part of its assessment of its performance in managing non-interest
expenses. However, this measure is supplemental, and is not a
substitute for an analysis of performance based on GAAP measures. The
reader is cautioned that the non-GAAP efficiency ratio used by the Company may
not be comparable to GAAP or non-GAAP efficiency ratios reported by other
financial institutions.
In
general, the efficiency ratio is non-interest expenses as a percentage of net
interest income plus non-interest income. Non-interest expenses used
in the calculation of the non-GAAP efficiency ratio exclude goodwill impairment
losses, the amortization of intangibles, and non-recurring
expenses. Income for the non-GAAP ratio includes the favorable effect
of tax-exempt income (see Table 11), and excludes securities gains and losses,
which vary widely from period to period without appreciably affecting operating
expenses, and non-recurring gains (losses). The measure is different
from the GAAP efficiency ratio, which also is presented in this
report. The GAAP measure is calculated using non-interest expense and
income amounts as shown on the face of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income/(Loss). The GAAP and non-GAAP efficiency ratios are reconciled
in Table 17. As shown in Table 17, the GAAP and Non-GAAP efficiency
ratios improved in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of
2009. This was due mainly to the decreases in salary and benefit expense and a
decline in intangible amortization. The decline in the GAAP and
Non-GAAP ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to same
period of the prior year was driven by declines in the amortization of
intangibles and FDIC insurance partially offset by an increase other
non-interest expense.
Table
17 – GAAP and Non-GAAP Efficiency Ratios
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
GAAP
efficiency ratio:
|
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
expenses
|
$ | 25,339 | $ | 26,567 | $ | 76,598 | $ | 77,675 | ||||||||
Net
interest income plus non-interest income
|
$ | 40,237 | $ | 37,064 | $ | 120,601 | $ | 109,541 | ||||||||
Efficiency
ratio–GAAP
|
62.98 | % | 71.68 | % | 63.51 | % | 70.91 | % | ||||||||
Non-GAAP
efficiency ratio:
|
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
expenses
|
$ | 25,339 | $ | 26,567 | $ | 76,598 | $ | 77,675 | ||||||||
Less
non-GAAP adjustment:
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
495 | 1,048 | 1,487 | 3,150 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest
expenses as adjusted
|
$ | 24,844 | $ | 25,519 | $ | 75,111 | $ | 74,525 | ||||||||
Net
interest income plus non-interest income
|
$ | 40,237 | $ | 37,064 | $ | 120,601 | $ | 109,541 | ||||||||
Plus
non-GAAP adjustment:
|
||||||||||||||||
Tax-equivalent
income
|
1,321 | 1,331 | 3,484 | 3,463 | ||||||||||||
Less
non-GAAP adjustments:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities
gains
|
25 | 15 | 323 | 207 | ||||||||||||
OTTI
recognized in earnings
|
(380 | ) | - | (469 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Net
interest income plus non-interest income - as adjusted
|
$ | 41,913 | $ | 38,380 | $ | 124,231 | $ | 112,797 | ||||||||
Efficiency
ratio–Non-GAAP
|
59.27 | % | 66.49 | % | 60.46 | % | 66.07 | % |
43
Item
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
See
“Financial Condition - Market Risk and Interest Rate Sensitivity” in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, above, which is incorporated herein by
reference. Management has determined that no additional disclosures
are necessary to assess changes in information about market risk that have
occurred since December 31, 2009.
Item
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The
Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated as of
the last day of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There were
no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Act of 1934) during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
In the
normal course of business, the Company becomes involved in litigation arising
form the banking, financial and other activities it
conducts. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not
anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising from these matters will
have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, operating results
or liquidity.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
The
following supplements the risk factors discussed in the 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
Recently
enacted regulatory reform may have a material impact on our
operations.
On July
21, 2010, the President signed into law The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The Dodd-Frank Act
contains various provisions designed to enhance the regulation of depository
institutions and prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis such as occurred
in 2008-2009. Also included is the creation of a new federal agency
to administer and enforce consumer and fair lending laws, a function that is now
performed by the depository institution regulators. The Dodd-Frank
Act also will modify consolidated capital requirements for bank holding
companies, which will limit our ability to borrow at the holding company and
invest the proceeds from such borrowings as capital in Sandy Spring Bank that
could be leveraged to support additional growth. The full impact of
the Dodd-Frank Act on our business and operations will not be known for years
until regulations implementing the statute are written and
adopted. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a material impact on our
operations, particularly through increased compliance costs resulting from
possible future consumer and fair lending regulations.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There
were no shares repurchased in 2009 or 2010. As a result of
participating in the Department of the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program
(“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program, until December 31, 2011, the Company may not
repurchase any shares of its common stock, other than in connection with the
administration of an employee benefit plan, without the consent of the Treasury
Department.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None
Item
4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item
5. Other Information - None
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit
10(a)
|
Change
in Control Agreement by and among Sandy Spring Bancorp,
Inc.,
|
Sandy
Spring Bank and R. Louis Caceres
|
|
Exhibit
10(b)
|
Change
in Control Agreement by and among Sandy Spring Bancorp,
Inc.,
|
Sandy
Spring Bank and Joseph J. O’Brien, Jr.
|
|
Exhibit
31(a)
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer
|
Exhibit
31(b)
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
|
Exhibit
32 (a)
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S. Section
1350
|
Exhibit
32 (b)
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S. Section
1350
|
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SANDY
SPRING BANCORP, INC.
(Registrant)
By:
|
/s/ Daniel J.
Schrider
|
Daniel J.
Schrider
President
and Chief Executive Officer
Date:
November 12, 2010
By:
|
/s/ Philip J.
Mantua
|
Philip J.
Mantua
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:
November 12, 2010
45