SELECTIS HEALTH, INC. - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission file number 0-15415

GLOBAL HEALTHCARE REIT, INC .

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Registrant’s telephone number: (303) 449-2100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.05 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act [  ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. [  ]

Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and” smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the 17,134,962 shares of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2016 was $5,997,367 computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold at June 30, 2016.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of April 17, 2017 is 25,782,686.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Exhibits, See Part IV

GLOBAL HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains statements that plan for or anticipate the future. In this Annual Report, forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words “anticipate,” “plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” and the like. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following:

Although we believe that any forward-looking statements we make in this Annual Report are reasonable, because forward-looking statements involve future risks and uncertainties, there are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied. For example, a few of the uncertainties that could affect the accuracy of forward-looking statements, besides the specific factors identified above in the Risk Factors section of this Annual Report, include:

In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report, particularly in view of our early stage of operations, the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.

PART I

ITEM 1.      BUSINESS

Background

Global Healthcare REIT, Inc. (“Global” or “we” or the “Company”) was organized for the purpose of investing in real estate related to the long-term care industry. Prior to the Company changing its name to Global Healthcare REIT, Inc. on September 30, 2013, the Company was known as Global Casinos, Inc. Global Casinos, Inc. operated two gaming casinos which were split-off and sold on September 30, 2013. Simultaneous with the split-off and sale of the gaming operations, the Company acquired West Paces Ferry Healthcare REIT, Inc. (WPF). We plan to elect to be treated as a real estate investment trust (REIT) in the future; however, we do not intend to make that election for the 2016 fiscal year.

We acquire, develop, lease, manage and dispose of healthcare real estate, and provide financing to healthcare providers. Our portfolio will be comprised of investments in the following five healthcare segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) life science, (iii) medical office, (iv) post-acute/skilled nursing and (v) hospital. We will make investments within our healthcare segments using the following five investment products: (i) properties under lease, (ii) debt investments, (iii) developments and redevelopments, (iv) investment management and (v) the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (“RIDEA”), which represents investments in senior housing operations utilizing the structure permitted by RIDEA.

The delivery of healthcare services requires real estate and, as a result, tenants and operators depend on real estate, in part, to maintain and grow their businesses. We believe that the healthcare real estate market provides investment opportunities due to the following:

Our Properties

Acquisition of West Paces Ferry Healthcare REIT, Inc. (WPF)

On September 30, 2013, Global acquired all of the outstanding common stock of WPF in consideration of $100. WPF owns a 65% membership interest in Dodge NH, LLC, which owns a skilled nursing facility located in Eastman, Georgia.

Concurrently with the consummation of the split-off of gaming operations and the WPF acquisition, the Company’s directors and executive officers were reconstituted.

Acquisition of Middle Georgia Nursing Home

Effective July 1, 2012, Georgia Healthcare REIT, Inc., (“Georgia REIT”) a private company owned and controlled by a former affiliate, consummated its first acquisition: the Middle Georgia Nursing Home. Middle Georgia Nursing Home is located at 556 Chester Highway in Eastman, Georgia (“Middle Georgia” or the “Facility”). The Facility was acquired through Dodge NH, LLC, a limited liability company formed for the purpose of acquiring Middle Georgia that was initially wholly-owned by Georgia REIT. Dodge Investors, LLC was formed and organized as a financing entity to raise $1.1 million in funding to complete the financing required to complete the acquisition, as more fully described below.

The terms of the acquisition of Middle Georgia were as follows: The purchase price was $5.0 million, of which $4.2 million was paid with the proceeds of a commercial mortgage with Colony Bank, as senior lender, which accrued interest at 6.25% per annum; and the balance of $1.0 million was provided by Dodge Investors, LLC. Dodge Investors LLC funded Dodge NH, LLC with $1.1 million in consideration of 13% unsecured notes and a carried 35% membership interest in Dodge NH, LLC. Of the $1.1 million raised by Dodge Investors, LLC, $125,000 was invested by Georgia REIT from loan proceeds from the Company, representing a 4% membership interest of the total 35% membership interest held by Dodge Investors, LLC. The Dodge NH, LLC notes purchased by Dodge Investors, LLC accrued interest at the rate of 13% per annum, interest payable monthly, with the outstanding balance of principal and accrued and unpaid interest due July 1, 2014.

Effective March 15, 2013, Georgia REIT conveyed its entire 65% membership interest in Dodge NH to WPF. During 2014 and 2015, the Company acquired the remaining membership interests in Dodge Investors, LLC and holds a 100% membership interest as of December 31, 2016. The Company has also repaid the entire $1.1 million note to Dodge Investors, LLC.

Dodge NH, LLC has an operating lease agreement with Eastman Healthcare and Rehab, LLC, owned by a professional skilled nursing facility operator, having an initial term of five years expiring in June 2017, with an option to renew for an additional five-year period. On January 22, 2016, the lease operator that operates the facility filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Under the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, the lease operator can either assume or reject the lease. As of the date of this report, the lease operator has not made any binding elections, but has verbally represented that he intends to affirm the lease.

Acquisition of Warrenton Nursing Home

Effective December 31, 2013, the Company consummated the purchase of the 110 bed Warrenton Nursing Home (“Warrenton”) located in Warrenton, Georgia. Warrenton was purchased by ATL/WARR, LLC, a single purpose Georgia limited liability company (“Warr LLC”) previously owned 95% by a former affiliate and 5% by an unaffiliated investor. Concurrently, the former affiliate conveyed his 95% membership interest in Warr LLC to the Company for nominal consideration.

Warr LLC entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated April 3, 2013 (the “PSA”) with Providence Health Care, Inc., as seller, covering the Warrenton facility. The purchase price of Warrenton was $3.5 million, of which $2.72 million was provided by a commercial senior bank loan, and approximately $984,500 was provided by the Company.

Pursuant to the PSA, Warr LLC acquired (i) the land on which the facility is located, (ii) all buildings and other structures situated on or appurtenant to the land, (iii) all appliances, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and (iv) all transferable intangible assets and property related to the facility.

Neither Warr LLC nor the Company (i) owns a direct equity interest in the skilled nursing facility business operated by the Operator, (ii) is subject to a beneficial participating or residual interest in such business, or (iii) is entitled to participate in, or otherwise influence, any decision related to such business, except for customary provisions under the Lease with regard to the use, regulatory compliance, maintenance, alteration and preservation of the real property and FF&E.

Acquisition of Southern Hills Retirement Center

Effective February 7, 2014, the Company acquired the real property and improvements comprising a 100% interest in the Southern Hills Retirement Center located in Tulsa, Oklahoma (“Southern Hills”). To complete the acquisition, the Company formed and organized Southern Tulsa, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, a new wholly-owned subsidiary of WPF.

The Southern Hills facility is comprised of a senior living campus of three buildings totaling 104,192 square feet sitting on a 4.36-acre parcel. The Center consists of a Assisted Living facility (“ALF”), an Independent Living facility (“ILF”) and a Skilled Nursing facility (“SNF”). The Center offers 116 nursing beds, 86 independent living units, and 32 assisted living beds.

The purchase price for Southern Hills was $2.0 million, of which $1.5 million was provided by a senior mortgage with First Commercial Bank, with the balance of $500,000 provided by Global. Global also provided a guaranty of the loan from First Commercial Bank.

In the purchase of the property, Southern Tulsa, LLC acquired (i) the land on which the facility is located, (ii) all buildings and other structures situated on or appurtenant to the land, (iii) all appliances, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and (iv) all transferable intangible assets and property related to the facility.

On March 1, 2014, the Tulsa County Industrial Authority issued $5.7 million of its First Mortgage Revenue Bonds and lent the net proceeds to the Company. The Company used the proceeds to pay off the $1.5 million bridge loan, to pay certain costs of the bond issuance, to renovate the 86 independent living units and 32-bed assisted living facility, and to establish a debt service reserve fund and other initial deposits as required by the bond indenture. The debt is secured by a first mortgage lien on the independent living units and assisted living facility (facilities), an assignment of the facilities leases, a first lien on all personal property located in the facilities, and a guaranty by the Company. The debt bears interest at rates ranging from 7.0% to 8.5% with principal and interest due monthly beginning in May 2014 through maturity on March 1, 2044. The loan agreement also contains financial covenants required to be maintained by the Company.

The SNF was refinanced with a commercial bank for $1,750,000. The SNF was under a five-year lease to Healthcare Management of Oklahoma for an initial rent of $35,000 per month commencing February 1, 2015. On May 10, 2016, the Company obtained a Court Order appointing a Receiver to control and operate the SNF. The former lease operator represented that it was unable to meet the financial commitments of the facility, including the payment of rent, payroll, and other operating requirements. The transition to the Receiver resulted in our engaging in a turnaround effort to restore viable operations at the SNF. Under the oversight of the Receiver, we have undertaken substantial renovations at the SNF at a cost of over $1,500,000. The final phase of those upgrades should be completed in the second quarter of 2017.

The ALF was leased to Healthcare Management of Oklahoma (same tenant as SNF) for an initial rent of $20,000 per month which was to commence on April 1, 2015; however, additional renovations were required to open the facility and the commencement of rent payments has been delayed. To date we have expended in excess of $2.0 million in upgrades at the ALF, and hope to begin operations in the second quarter of 2017. The Company plans to seek a new tenant for the ALF to assume operations at the completion of construction.

The ILF requires renovation and is not subject to an operating lease. When the renovation is complete the Company plans to lease it as well.

Acquisition of Interest In Limestone Assisted Living

Effective March 5, 2014, WPF consummated a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement providing for the purchase from Connie Brogdon, spouse of Christopher Brogdon, President and Director of the Company, for nominal consideration ($10.00) a 25% membership interest in Limestone Assisted Living, LLC (“Limestone LLC”). The other 75% membership interest in Limestone LLC is owned by Connie Brogdon (5%) and unaffiliated third parties (70%). The Company also extended a loan to Limestone LLC in the principal amount of $550,000 (the “Limestone Loan”), which is repayable, together with interest at the rate of 10% per annum, on or before the earlier of (i) August 31, 2014 or (ii) from the proceeds of the sale of the Limestone Assisted Living facility. The obligation of Limestone LLC to repay the Limestone Loan is secured by the personal Guaranty of Christopher Brogdon. All of the proceeds of the Limestone Loan were used by Limestone LLC to repay and retire a loan in the principal amount of $500,000, plus accrued and unpaid interest, owed to an unaffiliated third party. That $500,000 loan had matured on February 1, 2013. In February 2015, we agreed to extend the maturity date of the Limestone Loan to August 1, 2015.

Limestone LLC owns 100% of the Limestone Assisted Living facility (“Limestone”), a 42 bed, 22,189 square foot assisted living facility situated on 4.43 acres located in Gainesville, Georgia. There is senior secured bond debt in the approximate amount of $3.7 million in addition to the Limestone Loan.

On March 25, 2015, the Limestone facility was sold and the Limestone Loan, including all accrued and unpaid interest, was repaid in full.

Acquisition of Goodwill Nursing Home

Effective May 19, 2014, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement pursuant to which it acquired from Christopher and Connie Brogdon (i) units representing an undivided 45% Membership Interest in Goodwill Hunting, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, and (ii) units representing an undivided 36.7% Membership Interest in GWH Investors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (collectively, the “Units”). GWH Investors, LLC owns a 40% membership interest in Goodwill Hunting, LLC. Together, the Company acquired, directly and indirectly, a 59.7% interest in Goodwill Hunting, LLC. The purchase price for the Units was $800,000. The facility is subject to an aggregate of $4,601,009 in senior debt and $1,344,000 in non-affiliated subordinated debt.

Goodwill Hunting, LLC owns the Goodwill Nursing Home, a 172 bed skilled nursing facility located in Macon, Georgia. It was leased to Goodwill Healthcare and Rehabilitation, LLC under an operating lease that expires in 2017. In January 2016, concurrently with the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy filing by the lease operator, the Goodwill Nursing Home was closed by Georgia regulators and all residents were removed. The Company has entered into a new ten year operating lease covering the facility which became effective in February, 2017 with the new operator having obtained all licenses, permits and other regulatory approval necessary to recertify and reopen the facility. After receiving regulatory approvals, the lease operator invested approximately $2.0 million in capital improvements in the property. The facility has been relicensed and began taking patients in December 2016 and is currently building census.

Effective December 3, 2014, the Company acquired a 96.56% membership interest in GWH Investors, LLC, which holds a 40% membership interest in Goodwill Hunting, LLC. The purchase price for the 96.56% interest in GWH Investors, LLC was 164,491 shares of common stock of the Company.

The subordinated debt in the amount of $1,280,000 matured on July 1, 2015. With accrued and unpaid interest, the outstanding balance of the subordinated debt at December 31, 2016 was $1,344,000. Investors in the subordinated debt were entitled to an additional 5% equity in Goodwill Hunting, LLC every six months if the debt is not paid by the Company when due. Effective December 31, 2015, the investors holding all of the outstanding interests in the subordinated debt executed an Agreement Among Lenders pursuant to which they (i) waived any and all equity ratchets and (ii) agreed to extend the maturity date of the subordinated debt to June 30, 2017, in consideration for which Goodwill Hunting, LLC agreed to pay each investor a one-time premium equal to 5% of the principal amount of the notes at such time as the notes are repaid.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company owns an 85% interest in Goodwill Hunting, LLC. That interest was 83.62% at December 31, 2015. The investors in GWH Investors, LLC still hold subordinated debt in the net amount of $1,280,000.

Acquisition of Edwards Redeemer Health & Rehab

Effective September 16, 2014, the Company acquired from a former affiliate a 62.5% membership interest in Edwards Redeemer Property Holding, LLC, which owns the real property and improvements known as the Edwards Redeemer Health & Rehab, a 106 bed nursing home located on 3.05 acres in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Edwards Redeemer Health & Rehab is operated under a triple-net operating lease to a regional professional skilled nursing home operator, which will expire in December 2017. On January 22, 2016, the lease operator that operates the facility filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Under the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, the lease operator can either assume or reject the lease. As of the date of this report, the lease operator has not made any binding elections, but has verbally represented that he intends to affirm the lease.

The purchase price for the 62.5% interest in the facility was $491,487, which is subject to an aggregate of $2,381,500 in debt. The purchase price was offset in its entirety as a credit against an advance receivable owed by a former affiliate to the Company.

Effective December 3, 2014, the Company acquired a 100% membership interest in Redeemer Investors, LLC which owned the remaining 37.5% membership interest in Edwards Redeemer Property Holdings, LLC. The purchase price for the 100% interest in Redeemer Investors, LLC was 269,245 shares of common stock of the Company. As a result of these transactions, the Company now holds a 100% interest in Edwards Redeemer Property Holdings, LLC.

The investors in Redeemer Investors, LLC were repaid in full on January 23, 2015.

Acquisition of Grand Prairie (formerly Golden Years Manor) Nursing Home

Effective September 16, 2014, the Company acquired from a former affiliate a 44.5% membership interest in GL Nursing, LLC, which owns the real property and improvements known as the Golden Years Manor Nursing Home located at 1010 Barnes Street in Lonoke, Arkansas. The facility has 141 licensed beds and comprises 40,737 square feet on 3.17 acres.

Golden Years Manor Nursing Home is operated under a triple-net operating lease to a regional professional skilled nursing home operator, which will expire in May 2017. The lease currently generates $763,000 in gross annual rent.

The purchase price for the 44.5% interest in the facility was 192,767 shares of common stock in Global Healthcare REIT, Inc. The facility is subject to an aggregate of $4,671,537 in senior debt and $1,650,000 in subordinated debt.

Effective December 3, 2014, The Company acquired a 26.25% membership interest in GLN Investors, LLC, which owned a 30% interest in GL Nursing, LLC. The purchase price for the 26.25% interest in GLN Investors, LLC was 31,015 shares of common stock in Global Healthcare REIT, Inc.

During 2015, the Company acquired an additional 73.48% in GLN Investors, LLC, bringing its interest to 100%. The purchase price for the additional shares was 107,113 shares of common stock in Global Healthcare REIT, Inc.

In January 2016, the Company acquired an additional 24.5% interest in GLN Investors, LLC, bringing its interest in GLN Investors to 100%. The purchase price for the 24.5% interest was 54,000 shares of common stock of Global.

In August 2016, the Company completed an exchange offering in which it purchased from the former members of GLN Investors, LLC all of their interest in the $1,650,000 subordinated debt owed to GLN Investors, LLC by GL Nursing, LLC in consideration of 1.35 million shares of Global.

As a result of these transactions, at December 31, 2016, the Company held a 100% interest in GL Nursing, LLC. That interest was 75.5% at December 31, 2015.

In January 2016, affiliated entities of our lease operator filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. At the same time, our lease operator agreed to terminate its lease to allow a new operator to take possession of the facility. At that time, operations at the facility had deteriorated and the operator was delinquent in the payment of bed taxes as well a rent. The successor operator was unable to restore profitable operations and in August 2016 informed us that it was going to terminate its lease, which would have resulted in a loss of the Certificate of Need (“CON”) required to operate as a skilled nursing facility. Effective August 29, 2016, we executed a new operating lease with another operator. The initial lease term is ten years with two five year renewal options. The lease term does not begin until the end of the straddle period described below. The lease operator has also been granted an option to purchase the property any time after five years for a purchase price of $6.4 million.

Under the terms of the new lease, we agreed to cover all operating losses incurred by the new operator during a “straddle period” during which the operator is not obligated to pay rent and has agreed to undertake substantial renovations and build the census which had been significantly depleted during the prior two operator regimes. We have been honoring our commitment to cover these losses, which to date have been approximately $350,000. We have discovered a drafting error in the lease which creates ambiguity surrounding when the straddle period will terminate. Counsel for the operator has verbally indicated their agreement on the existence of the drafting error, but as of the date of this Annual Report the lease has not been amended to correct the error. If we are unable to resolve the issue, we plan to file a declaratory judgment action.

Acquisition of Providence of Sparta Nursing Home

Effective September 16, 2014, the Company acquired from a former affiliate a 65% membership interest in Providence HR, LLC, which owns the real property and improvements known as the Providence of Sparta Nursing Home. The facility has 71 licensed beds and is located on approximately 8 acres in Sparta, Georgia.

Providence of Sparta is operated under a triple-net operating lease to a regional professional skilled nursing home operator, which expired in June 2016. A new lease with a new operator currently generates $510,223 in gross annual straight line rent for fiscal year 2017.

The purchase price for the 65% interest in the facility was 61,930 shares of common stock of Global Healthcare REIT, Inc. The facility is subject to an aggregate of $1,655,123 in senior debt and $1,050,000 in subordinated debt.

Effective December 3, 2014, the Company acquired a 44.4% membership interest in Providence HR Investors, LLC, which owns a 30% membership interest in Providence HR, LLC. The purchase price for the 44.4% interest in Providence HR Investors, LLC was 45,145 shares of common stock of the Company.

During 2015, the Company acquired an additional 48.09% of Providence HR Investors, LLC bringing its interest to 92.46%. The purchase price for the additional shares was 17,333 shares of common stock in Global Healthcare REIT, Inc. In October 2016, we purchased the remaining 7.54% in outstanding interests in Providence HR Investors, LLC in consideration of 5,365 shares of common stock of Global and $10.00.

The subordinated debt in the amount of $1,050,000 matured on August 1, 2015. Providence HR Investors, LLC were entitled to an additional 5% equity in Providence HR, LLC every six months if the debt is not paid when due.

As a result of these transactions, the Company now holds a 100% interest in Providence HR, LLC. The investors in Providence HR Investors, LLC still retain $1,050,000 in subordinated debt.

In March 2017, the former members of Providence HR Investors, LLC which hold the interest in the $1.05 million subordinated debt all agreed to execute a Forbearance Agreement in which they agreed to (i) extend the maturity date of the note to December 31, 2017, (ii) waive accrued default interest and (iii) waive the equity ratchet that was triggered by the note not being repaid on the original maturity date.  

We have filed an application to refinance this facility with a HUD loan, which we hope to have completed by the end of 2017.

Acquisition of Greene Point Health Care Center

Effective September 16, 2014, the Company acquired from a former affiliate a 62.145% membership interest in Wash/Greene, LLC, which owns the real property and improvements known as the Greene Point Healthcare Center, located at 1321 Washington Highway in Union Point, Georgia. The facility has 71 licensed beds and is located on approximately 9 acres.

The purchase price for the 62.145% interest in the facility was 73,253 shares of common stock of Global Healthcare REIT, Inc. The facility was subject to an aggregate of $1,692,000 in senior debt and $1,125,000 in subordinated debt.

Effective December 3, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding membership interests in 1321 Investors, LLC, which owned a 30% membership interest in Wash/Greene, LLC. The purchase price for the 30% membership interest in 1321 Investors, LLC was 115,000 shares of common stock of the Company.

The subordinated debt in the amount of $1,125,000 matured on October 1, 2015. Investors in the subordinated debt are entitled to an additional 5% equity in Providence HR, LLC every six months if the debt is not paid when due. Effective December 31, 2015, the investors holding all of the outstanding interests in the subordinated debt executed an Agreement Among Lenders pursuant to which they (i) waived any and all equity ratchets and (ii) agreed to extend the maturity date of the subordinated debt to June 30, 2017.

Disposition of Greene Point Health Care Center

Effective June 30, 2016, the Company sold Greene Point Health Care Center for cash proceeds for $3,800,000 million. Cash proceeds from the sale were used to pay off the existing mortgage loan in the amount of $1,683,200. The Company received $2,112,970 in cash from the sale the facility, net of the senior loan, and used some of the proceeds to retire the subordinated debt owed to the former members of 1321 Investors, LLC.

Meadowview Healthcare Center

Effective September 30, 2014, the Company purchased the Meadowview Healthcare Center located in Seville, Ohio (“Meadowview”) and owns 100% of this facility. The facility is licensed for 100 skilled nursing beds, is 27,500 square feet and located on five acres of land. Seville, Ohio is located approximately 25 miles west of Akron, Ohio and 40 miles south of Cleveland, Ohio in an area with attractive population growth in the 65 to 74-year age bracket. The total purchase price for Meadowview was $3.0 million, which was paid in cash using the proceeds of the Note Offering described below. Meadowview was acquired through High Street Nursing, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company formed for the sole purpose of completing the purchase.

Meadowview is operated under a triple-net operating lease to a regional professional skilled nursing home operator, which expires in October 2024. The lease currently generate $361,000 in gross annual rent for fiscal year 2016.

Financings

2013 Private Offering of Common Stock

We commenced a private offering of our common stock, $0.05 par value (“Common Stock”) on December 4, 2013 (the “Offering”). The Offering consisted of up to 7.5 million shares of Common Stock being offered on a 2,250,000 share, all-or-none, minimum (“Minimum Offering”), 7,500,000 share maximum, best efforts, basis (“Maximum Offering”) at a private offering price of $0.75 per share. We also granted the Placement Agent an over-allotment option to sell an additional 1.5 million shares on the same terms.

On March 14, 2014, we completed the Final Closing of our Private Offering, having sold in the Offering an aggregate of 8,966,688 shares of common stock, including exercise of the Placement Agent’s over-allotment option, for gross consideration of $6,724,998 consisting of (i) $5,988,653 in cash, (ii) $623,793 in Notes exchanged for common stock and (iii) a 32.5% membership interest in Scottsburg Investors, LLC exchanged for 150,000 shares. We used a portion of the proceeds from the Private Offering to repay notes payable and to acquire Warrenton.

2014 Note Offering

The Company completed a private offering of its 6.5% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Notes”) on September 26, 2014 (the “Note Offering”). The Notes accrue interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, payable quarterly, and mature on the third anniversary of the date of issue. The Notes can be called for redemption at the option of the Company at any time (i) after September 15, 2015 but prior to September 15, 2016 at an early redemption price equal to 103% of the face amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, or (ii) any time after September 15, 2016 but prior to September 15, 2017 at an early redemption price equal to 102% of the face amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Each Note is convertible at the option of the holder into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $1.37 per share. The Notes will automatically convert into common stock at the conversion price in the event (i) there exists a public market for the Company’s common stock, (ii) the closing price of the common stock in the principal trading market has been $2.00 per share or higher for the preceding ten (10) trading days, and (iii) either (A) there is an effective registration statement registering for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the conversion shares or (B) the conversion shares are eligible to be resold by non-affiliates of the Company without restriction under Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

The Notes are secured by a senior mortgage on the Meadowview Healthcare Center located in Seville, Ohio.

2015 Debt Refinancing

During 2015, the Company paid off existing debt of $880,000, with an interest rate of 12.0% maturing on October 1, 2016, and $1,361,728, with an interest rate of 4.25% maturing on December 20, 2017, related to our Edwards Redeemer property. The debt was refinanced with a financial institution in the amount of $2,303,815 at a fixed interest rate of 5.50% maturing on January 16, 2020.

2016 Note Offering

In November 2016, the Company commenced a private offering of its 10% Senior Secured Promissory Notes in the aggregate amount up to $1,000,000, on a best efforts basis. As of December 31, 2016, $600,000 of the notes have been issued. During the first quarter of 2017, we sold an additional $125,000 in notes and warrants. The notes bear interest at a rate of 10% payable monthly with principal and unpaid interest due at maturity on January 13, 2018. For every $1.00 in principal amount of note, each investor will receive one warrant exercisable for 12 months to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The notes are secured by a senior UCC security interest in the tangible and intangible assets of the Company.

Our Business

Healthcare Industry

Healthcare is the single largest industry in the U.S. based on Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”). According to the National Health Expenditures report by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”): (i) national health expenditures are expected to grow 1.2 percentage points faster than GDP per year over the 2016 – 2025 period; (ii) the average compounded annual growth rate for national health expenditures, over the projection period of 2016 through 2027, is anticipated to be 5.6%; and (iii) health spending is projected to represent 19.9% of US GDP by 2025, up from 17.8% in 2015.

Senior citizens are the largest consumers of healthcare services. According to CMS, on a per capita basis, the 85-year and older segment of the population spends 92% more on healthcare than the 65 to 84-year-old segment and over 329% more than the population average.

Business Strategy

Our primary goal is to increase shareholder value through profitable growth. Our investment strategy to achieve this goal is based on three principles: (i) opportunistic investing, (ii) portfolio diversification and (iii) conservative financing.

Opportunistic Investing

We will make investment decisions that are expected to drive profitable growth and create shareholder value. We will attempt to position ourselves to create and take advantage of situations to meet our goals and investment criteria.

Portfolio Diversification

We believe in maintaining a portfolio of healthcare investments diversified by segment, geography, operator, tenant and investment product. Diversification reduces the likelihood that a single event would materially harm our business and allows us to take advantage of opportunities in different markets based on individual market dynamics. While pursuing our strategy of diversification, we will monitor, but will not limit, our investments based on the percentage of our total assets that may be invested in any one property type, investment product, geographic location, the number of properties which we may lease to a single operator or tenant, or mortgage loans we may make to a single borrower. With investments in multiple segments and investment products, we can focus on opportunities with the most attractive risk/reward profile for the portfolio as a whole. We may structure transactions as master leases, require operator or tenant insurance and indemnifications, obtain credit enhancements in the form of guarantees, letters of credit or security deposits, and take other measures to mitigate risk.

Financing

We will strive to manage our debt-to-equity levels and maintain multiple sources of liquidity, access to capital markets and secured debt lenders, relationships with current and prospective institutional joint venture partners, and our ability to divest of assets. Our debt obligations will be primarily fixed rate with staggered maturities, which reduces the impact of rising interest rates on our operations.

We plan to finance our investments based on our evaluation of available sources of funding. For short-term purposes, we may arrange for short-term borrowings from banks or other sources. We may also arrange for longer-term financing through offerings of equity and debt securities, placement of mortgage debt and capital from other institutional lenders and equity investors.

Competition

Investing in real estate serving the healthcare industry is highly competitive. We will face competition from REITs, investment companies, private equity and hedge fund investors, sovereign funds, healthcare operators, lenders, developers and other institutional investors, some of whom may have greater resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition makes it more challenging for us to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our objectives. Our ability to compete may also be impacted by national and local economic trends, availability of investment alternatives, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, existing laws and regulations, new legislation and population trends.

Income from our facilities is dependent on the ability of our operators and tenants to compete with other companies on a number of different levels, including: the quality of care provided, reputation, the physical appearance of a facility, price and range of services offered, alternatives for healthcare delivery, the supply of competing properties, physicians, staff, referral sources, location, the size and demographics of the population in surrounding areas, and the financial condition of our tenants and operators. Private, federal and state payment programs as well as the effect of laws and regulations may also have a significant influence on the profitability of our tenants and operators.

Healthcare Segments

Senior housing. Senior housing facilities include assisted living facilities (“ALFs”), independent living facilities (“ILFs”) and continuing care retirement communities (“CCRCs”), which cater to different segments of the elderly population based upon their needs. Services provided by our operators or tenants in these facilities are primarily paid for by the residents directly or through private insurance and are less reliant on government reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. Senior housing property types are further described below.

Assisted Living Facilities. ALFs are licensed care facilities that provide personal care services, support and housing for those who need help with activities of daily living (“ADL”) yet require limited medical care. The programs and services may include transportation, social activities, exercise and fitness programs, beauty or barber shop access, hobby and craft activities, community excursions, meals in a dining room setting and other activities sought by residents. These facilities are often in apartment-like buildings with private residences ranging from single rooms to large apartments. Certain ALFs may offer higher levels of personal assistance for residents with Alzheimer’s disease or other forms of dementia. Levels of personal assistance are based in part on local regulations.

Independent Living Facilities. ILFs are designed to meet the needs of seniors who choose to live in an environment surrounded by their peers with services such as housekeeping, meals and activities. These residents generally do not need assistance with ADL, such as bathing, eating and dressing. However, residents have the option to contract for these services.

Continuing Care Retirement Communities. CCRCs provide housing and health-related services under long-term contracts. This alternative is appealing to residents as it eliminates the need for relocating when health and medical needs change, thus allowing residents to “age in place.” Some CCRCs require a substantial entry or buy-in fee and most also charge monthly maintenance fees in exchange for a living unit, meals and some health services. CCRCs typically require the individual to be in relatively good health and independent upon entry.

Post-acute/skilled nursing. Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) offer restorative, rehabilitative and custodial nursing care for people not requiring the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at hospitals. Ancillary revenues and revenues from sub-acute care services are derived from providing services to residents beyond room and board and include occupational, physical, speech, respiratory and intravenous therapy, wound care, oncology treatment, brain injury care and orthopedic therapy as well as sales of pharmaceutical products and other services. Certain SNFs provide some of the foregoing services on an out-patient basis.

Post-acute/skilled nursing services provided by our operators and tenants in these facilities will be primarily paid for either by private sources or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Life science. These properties contain laboratory and office space primarily for biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies and other organizations involved in the life science industry. While these properties contain similar characteristics to commercial office buildings, they generally contain more advanced electrical, mechanical, and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) systems. The facilities generally have equipment including emergency generators, fume hoods, lab bench tops and related amenities. In many instances, life science tenants make significant investments to improve their leased space, in addition to landlord improvements, to accommodate biology, chemistry or medical device research initiatives.

Medical office. Medical office buildings (“MOBs”) typically contain physicians’ offices and examination rooms, and may also include pharmacies, hospital ancillary service space and outpatient services such as diagnostic centers, rehabilitation clinics and day-surgery operating rooms. While these facilities are similar to commercial office buildings, they require additional plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate multiple exam rooms that may require sinks in every room, and special equipment such as x-ray machines. In addition, MOBs are often built to accommodate higher structural loads for certain equipment and may contain “vaults” or other specialized construction. We expect our MOBs will be typically multi-tenant properties leased to healthcare providers (hospitals and physician practices).

Hospital. Services provided by our operators and tenants in these facilities are paid for by private sources, third-party payors (e.g., insurance and Health Maintenance Organizations or “HMOs”), or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Hospital property types include acute care, long-term acute care, and specialty and rehabilitation hospitals.

Investment Products

Properties under lease. We plan to primarily generate revenue by leasing properties under long-term leases. Most of our rents and other earned income from leases will be received under triple-net leases or leases that provide for a substantial recovery of operating expenses. However, some of our MOBs and life science facility rents will be structured under gross or modified gross leases. Accordingly, for such gross or modified gross leases, we may incur certain property operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management fees, utilities and insurance.

Our ability to grow income from properties under lease depends, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income and other earned income from leases by increasing rental rates and occupancy levels, (ii) maximize tenant recoveries and (iii) control non-recoverable operating expenses. Most of our leases will include contractual annual base rent escalation clauses that are either predetermined fixed increases and/or are a function of an inflation index.

Debt investments. Our mezzanine loans will generally be secured by a pledge of ownership interests of an entity or entities, which directly or indirectly own properties, and are subordinate to more senior debt, including mortgages and more senior mezzanine loans. Our interest in mortgages and construction financing will typically be issued by healthcare providers and will generally be secured by healthcare real estate.

Developments and redevelopments. We will generally commit to development projects that are at least 50% pre-leased or when we believe that market conditions will support speculative construction. We will work closely with our local real estate service providers, including brokerage, property management, project management and construction management companies to assist us in evaluating development proposals and completing developments. Our development and redevelopment investments will likely be in the life science and medical office segments. Redevelopments are properties that require significant capital expenditures (generally more than 25% of acquisition cost or existing basis) to achieve property stabilization or to change the primary use of the properties.

Investment management. We may co-invest in real estate properties with institutional investors through joint ventures structured as partnerships or limited liability companies. We may target institutional investors with long-term investment horizons who seek to benefit from our expertise in healthcare real estate. Predominantly, we plan to retain noncontrolling interests in the joint ventures ranging from 20% to 30% and serve as the managing member. These ventures generally allow us to earn acquisition and asset management fees, and have the potential for promoted interests or incentive distributions based on performance of the joint venture.

Operating properties (“RIDEA”). We may enter into contracts with healthcare operators to manage communities that are placed in a structure permitted by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (commonly referred to as “RIDEA”). Under the provisions of RIDEA, a REIT may lease “qualified health care properties” on an arm’s length basis to a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an “eligible independent contractor.” We view RIDEA as a structure primarily to be used on properties that present attractive valuation entry points, where repositioning with a new operator that is aligned with health care providers can bring scale, operating efficiencies, and/or ancillary services to drive growth.

Government Regulations, Licensing and Enforcement

Overview

Our tenants and operators will typically be subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local healthcare laws and regulations relating to fraud and abuse practices, government reimbursement, licensure and certificate of need and similar laws governing the operation of healthcare facilities, and we expect that the healthcare industry, in general, will continue to face increased regulation and pressure in the areas of fraud, waste and abuse, cost control, healthcare management and provision of services, among others. These regulations are wide-ranging and can subject our tenants and operators to civil, criminal and administrative sanctions. Affected tenants and operators may find it increasingly difficult to comply with this complex and evolving regulatory environment because of a relative lack of guidance in many areas as certain of our healthcare properties will be subject to oversight from several government agencies and the laws may vary from one jurisdiction to another. Changes in laws and regulations and reimbursement enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by our tenants and operators can all have a significant effect on their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely impact us.

We will seek to mitigate the risk to us resulting from the significant healthcare regulatory risks faced by our tenants and operators by diversifying our portfolio among property types and geographical areas, diversifying our tenant and operator base to limit our exposure to any single entity, and seeking tenants and operators who are not largely dependent on Medicaid reimbursement for their revenues. In addition, we ensure in each instance that our operators have obtained all necessary licenses and permits before beginning operations, and require that those operators covenant that they will comply with all applicable laws and regulations in connection with the facility operations.

The following is a discussion of certain laws and regulations generally applicable to our operators, and in certain cases, to us.

Fraud and Abuse Enforcement

There are various extremely complex federal and state laws and regulations governing healthcare providers’ relationships and arrangements and prohibiting fraudulent and abusive practices by such providers. These laws include (i) federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs, (ii) federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment or receipt of remuneration to induce referrals or recommendations of healthcare items or services, (iii) federal and state physician self-referral laws (commonly referred to as the “Stark Law”), which generally prohibit referrals by physicians to entities with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship, (iv) the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which prohibits, among other things, the knowing presentation of a false or fraudulent claim for certain healthcare services and (v) federal and state privacy laws, including the privacy and security rules contained in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of personal health information. Violations of healthcare fraud and abuse laws carry civil, criminal and administrative sanctions, including punitive sanctions, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and potential exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs. These laws are enforced by a variety of federal, state and local agencies and can also be enforced by private litigants through, among other things, federal and state false claims acts, which allow private litigants to bring qui tam or “whistleblower” actions. Many of our operators and tenants are subject to these laws, and some of them may in the future become the subject of governmental enforcement actions if they fail to comply with applicable laws.

Reimbursement

Sources of revenue for many of our tenants and operators will include, among other sources, governmental healthcare programs, such as the federal Medicare program and state Medicaid programs, and non-governmental payors, such as insurance carriers and HMOs. As federal and state governments focus on healthcare reform initiatives, and as many states face significant budget deficits, efforts to reduce costs by these payors will likely continue, which may result in reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenants and operators.

Healthcare Licensure and Certificate of Need

Certain healthcare facilities in our portfolio will be subject to extensive federal, state and local licensure, certification and inspection laws and regulations. In addition, various licenses and permits are required to dispense narcotics, operate pharmacies, handle radioactive materials and operate equipment. Many states require certain healthcare providers to obtain a certificate of need, which requires prior approval for the construction, expansion and closure of certain healthcare facilities. The approval process related to state certificate of need laws may impact some of our tenants’ and operators’ abilities to expand or change their businesses.

Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”)

Our properties must comply with the ADA and any similar state or local laws to the extent that such properties are “public accommodations” as defined in those statutes. The ADA may require removal of barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. To date, we have not received any notices of noncompliance with the ADA that have caused us to incur substantial capital expenditures to address ADA concerns. Should barriers to access by persons with disabilities be discovered at any of our properties, we may be directly or indirectly responsible for additional costs that may be required to make facilities ADA-compliant. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations pursuant to the ADA is an ongoing one, and we continue to assess our properties and make modifications as appropriate in this respect.

Environmental Matters

A wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations affect healthcare facility operations. These complex federal and state statutes, and their enforcement, involve a myriad of regulations, many of which involve strict liability on the part of the potential offender. Some of these federal and state statutes may directly impact us. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property or a secured lender, such as us, may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and the owner’s or secured lender’s liability therefore could exceed or impair the value of the property, and/or the assets of the owner or secured lender. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, could reduce our revenues.

Taxation

Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following summary of the taxation of the Company and the material federal tax consequences to the holders of our debt and equity securities is for general information only and is not tax advice. This summary does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to certain types of holders of stock or securities (including, but not limited to, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, financial institutions or broker-dealers, persons holding shares of common stock as part of a hedging, integrated conversion, or constructive sale transaction or a straddle, traders in securities that use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities, investors in pass-through entities and foreign corporations and persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States).

This summary does not discuss all of the aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to you in light of your particular investment or other circumstances. In addition, this summary does not discuss any state or local income taxation or foreign income taxation or other tax consequences. This summary is based on current U.S. federal income tax law. Subsequent developments in U.S. federal income tax law, including changes in law or differing interpretations, which may be applied retroactively, could have a material effect on the U.S. federal income tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our securities as set forth in this summary. Before you purchase our securities, you should consult your own tax advisor regarding the particular U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences of acquiring, owning and selling our securities.

General

We will elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) at such time as the Board of Directors, with the consultation of our professional advisors, determines that we qualify as a REIT under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. We cannot predict for which tax year that election will be made; however, we do not intend to make such an election for 2016. Therefore, applicable taxes have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Once we make the election to be treated as a REIT, we intend to continue to operate in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT, but there is no guarantee that we will qualify or remain qualified as a REIT for subsequent years. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet a variety of qualification tests imposed under federal income tax law with respect to income, assets, distribution level and diversity of share ownership. There can be no assurance that we will be owned and organized and will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified.

In any year in which we qualify as a REIT, in general, we will not be subject to federal income tax on that portion of our REIT taxable income or capital gain that is distributed to stockholders. We may, however, be subject to tax at normal corporate rates on any taxable income or capital gain not distributed. If we elect to retain and pay income tax on our net long-term capital gain, stockholders are required to include their proportionate share of our undistributed long-term capital gain in income, but they will receive a refundable credit for their share of any taxes paid by us on such gain.

Despite the REIT election, we may be subject to federal income and excise tax as follows:

On March 30, 2010, the President signed into law the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which requires U.S. stockholders who meet certain requirements and are individuals, estates or certain trusts to pay an additional 3.8% tax on, among other things, dividends on and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of stock for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012. U.S. stockholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this legislation on their ownership and disposition of shares of our stock.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2016, we had one full time salaried employee. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, our CEO, COO and CFO each received a grant of 250,000 shares for services rendered. Since July 1, 2016, our CEO and CFO are each compensated with equity valued at $38,000 per quarter. The Company also engages the services of consultants from time to time, some of which may be provided by affiliates of the Company at no cost.

ITEM 1A.      RISK FACTORS

Not applicable.

ITEM 1B.      UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.      PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2016, we owned eight senior living facilities. The following table provides summary information regarding these facilities.

ITEM 3.      LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to legal proceedings, claims, or disputes. We are or were a party to the following pending legal proceedings.

We were a party to a civil action captioned Summers v. West Paces Ferry Healthcare REIT, Inc., Southern Tulsa, LLC and SC CCRC, LLC, No. CJ-2015-3048 in the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma (the “Action”). The Action involved a personal injury claim brought by the heirs of a former resident of the Skilled Nursing Facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma owned by a subsidiary of the Company. This case has been dismissed.

Southern Tulsa, LLC v. Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, LLC, District Court of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, Case No. CJ – 2016- 01781.

This matter was brought by us to have the appointment of a Receiver for the Southern Tulsa SNF and to recover damages from our former operator at that facility. The Court has ordered the appointment of a Receiver effective May 10, 2016. Other claims and matters are pending.

Joann Howard v. Southern Tulsa, LLC, West Paces Ferry Healthcare REIT, LLC, et. al. District Court of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, Case No. CJ- 2015-03048.

This was a personal injury lawsuit brought by the heirs of a former resident of the Southern Tulsa SNF. Our affiliates were named as defendants due to their ownership of the property. This case has been dismissed.

Gregory D. Hughes, Esq. v. Janis M Tilford, et. al., Superior Court of Cobb County, Georgia, Civil Action File No. 16-1-2391-49.

This civil action arises from the termination of the Stock Purchase Agreement entered into by the Company’s subsidiary TNH Acquisition, LLC to acquire the skilled nursing facility in Ridgeway, South Carolina. The dispute is over the disposition of our $100,000 earnest money deposit which the escrow agent has interpleaded into the Court. This matter was settled in 2016.

Thomas v. Edwards Redeemer Property Holdings, LLC, et.al., District Court for Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, Case No. CJ 2016-2160.

This action arises from a personal injury claim brought by heirs of a former resident of our Edwards Redeemer facility. We are entitled to indemnification from the lease operator and should be covered under the lease operator’s general liability policy. As we are not the operators of the facility and believe we have indemnity coverage, we believe we have no exposure. The lease operator’s insurance carrier is providing a defense and indemnity; and as a result we believe the likelihood of a material adverse result is remote.

Verizon Construction, Inc., v. Southern Tulsa, LLC, et. al., District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, Case No. CJ-2015-04326.

This is a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action on the Southern Hills facility in Tulsa arising from work performed. The Plaintiff was a subcontractor to our general contractor; and while we paid the general contractor for that work, the general contractor apparently did not pay the subcontractor. Plaintiff is seeking $441,939 previously invoiced to the general contractor, plus attorney’s fees and costs. The general contractor, also a named defendant, is liable for this amount but may not have the resources to pay the plaintiff, therefore the Company may be liable for some unknown amount less than or equal to Plaintiff’s claim. The company is currently in discussions with the plaintiff and hopes to reach a settlement in the near future, of which there can be no assurance. The Company has accrued $25,000 as a probable loss for this matter in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, based on verbal agreements and formal settlement agreement under review.

ITEM 4.      MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

The outstanding shares of Common Stock are traded over-the-counter and quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) under the symbol “GBCS”. On April 25, 2011, the quotation was moved from the OTCBB to the OTCQB due to the lack of a market maker. The reported high and low bid and ask prices for the common stock are shown below for the period from January 2015 through December 31, 2016.

The closing price of the Company’s common stock as of April 13, 2017 was $0.46, as reported on the OTCQB. The OTCBB and OTCQB prices are bid and ask prices which represent prices between broker-dealers and do not include retail mark-ups and mark-downs or any commissions to the broker-dealer. The prices do not reflect prices in actual transactions. As of April 13, 2017, there were approximately 850 record owners of the Company’s common stock.

The OTC Bulletin Board is a registered quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last sale prices and volume information in over-the-counter (OTC) securities. An OTC equity security generally is any equity that is not listed or traded on NASDAQ or a national securities exchange. The OTCBB is not an issuer listing service, market or exchange. Although the OTCBB does not have any listing requirements, per se, to be eligible for quotation on the OTCBB, issuers must remain current in their filings with the SEC or applicable regulatory authority.

The Company’s Board of Directors may declare and pay dividends on outstanding shares of common stock out of funds legally available therefore in its sole discretion. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid dividends on common stock of $0, or $0.00 per share, and $440,779, or $0.02 per share, respectively, in addition to the 8% dividends on our outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock. Future dividends on our common stock will be authorized at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our actual cash flow, financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code if and when we elect to be treated as a REIT, and other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None, except as previously reported on Forms 8-K.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Our CEO and CFO serve on an at-will basis and are compensated through the issuance of shares of common stock valued at $38,000 per quarter for each officer. The arrangement is approved by the Board on a quarterly basis and has not been the subject of shareholder approval.

Not applicable.

GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred a net loss of $1,292,474, reported net cash used in operations of $506,953 and has an accumulated deficit of $6,021,903. These circumstances raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate sufficient revenues and cash flows to operate profitably and meet contractual obligations, or raise additional capital through debt financing or through sales of common stock.

The failure to achieve the necessary levels of profitability and cash flows or obtain additional funding would be detrimental to the Company. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 totaled $2,859,842, compared to $3,406,737 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $546,895.

On January 22, 2016, the lease operator that leased our Middle Georgia, Edwards Redeemer, Golden Years and Goodwill properties filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S Bankruptcy Code, and at the same time the regulators closed the Goodwill facility. At the time of the bankruptcy petition, we were owed pre-petition rent of over $600,000 which likely will not be recovered. The bankrupt lease operator also owned unpaid property taxes on each of the controlled properties totaling approximately $300,000 which constitute a lien on our interests and must be paid.

We continue to have to service the senior secured loan at Goodwill even though the property was closed in January 2016 and generated no revenues in 2016. In a transaction related to the sale of the Greene Point facility, an affiliate of the buyer of Greene Point has executed a ten year operating lease covering Goodwill. The operator expended approximately $2.0 million on renovations and in December 2016 took its first patients. In the first quarter of 2017, the operator completed all relicensing and Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement approvals, at which time the lease became effective. First residents were admitted in December 2016. Rent is based on census, payable at the rate of $2,000 per month for every ten residents, with an annual cap of $312,000.

We have not recognized any rental revenues related to the Lonoke property in 2016, and under the terms of the new lease with a new operator, we’ll continue to not receive any rental revenues until we have been reimbursed for the costs of refurbishment and operating losses incurred by the new operator which we are required to advance. We cannot predict when rental revenues will resume from the Lonoke facility. We have restructured our senior loan related to Lonoke which permitted us to defer certain payments in 2016 and pay interest only until April 1, 2017.

Rental revenues from our Southern Hills SNF has been sporadic under the Receivership on that property; and we have additional refurbishment costs for that facility. We recognized no rental revenues related to our assisted and independent living facilities in Tulsa, Oklahoma which were to have begun April 1, 2015; however, additional renovations are required to open the facilities. We expect to recognize rental revenues on the assisted living facility during 2017. Rental revenues for our independent living facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma will be recognized after construction activities and renovations have been completed, forecast to occur in 2018.

Effective June 30, 2016, we sold our Providence of Greene Point Healthcare Center for $3.8 million. From the proceeds, we retired the senior secured loan and subordinated unsecured debt. Prior to the sale, we recognized rental revenues of $143,616 for 2016 compared to $287,052 for 2015.

General and administrative expenses were $1,791,421 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $1,682,734 for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $108,687. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, general administrative expenses include $536,886 and $194,666, respectively, of share based compensation related to restricted stock and common stock awards granted. During 2015, we recognized bad debt expense of $550,651 related to the bankruptcy of a lease operator who operated four of our properties and on notes receivable and notes receivable-related parties which we determined to be uncollectible based on the borrower’s ability to repay. We recognized $150,000 of bad debt expense during 2016 related to a note receivable which we determined to be uncollectible. This classification also includes legal, accounting, and other professional fees incurred in complying with regulatory reporting requirements.

Property taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses totaled $584,374 and $152,065 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Lessees are responsible for the payment of insurance, taxes and other charges while under the lease. Should the lessee not pay all such charges, as required under the leases, we may be liable for such operating expenses. We have been required to cover these expenses at both our Goodwill since the facility was closed by regulators in January 2016 and the Lonoke facility due to defaults by our operator lessees. We are also responsible for property taxes and insurance related to the ALF and ILF at our Southern Hills Retirement Center.

Acquisition costs were $52,325 and $50,645 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During 2016, we incurred acquisition costs in the form of a partial forfeiture of an earnest money deposit related to the potential purchase of a skilled nursing facility. The acquisition failed to close. We did not acquire any properties during the 2015 year; however, we incurred acquisition costs related to potential acquisitions which do not close.

We conducted our annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2015. Due to continued operating losses and cash flow deficiencies during 2015, we assessed qualitative factors and determined that we could not conclude that it was more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill exceeded its carrying value for the goodwill recorded. Accordingly, we proceeded to a quantitative evaluation of potential impairment of goodwill. As a result, we impaired goodwill in its entirety and recorded an impairment charge of $1,750,454 during 2015.

We recognized a gain on disposal of property and equipment of $980,839 during 2016 related to the sale of our Providence of Greene Point Healthcare Center for cash proceeds of $3.8 million.

Depreciation expense totaled $1,470,238 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $1,115,700 for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $354,538. We have not recorded depreciation expense on our independent living and assisted living facilities located at our Southern Hills Retirement Center which will commence once renovations have been completed and the property is placed in service.

Warrants to purchase our common stock with nonstandard anti-dilution provisions, regardless of the probability or likelihood that may conditionally obligate the issuer to ultimately transfer assets, are classified as liabilities and are recorded at their estimated fair value at each reporting period. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recognized a change in fair value of the warrant liability of $58,085 and $638,172, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized a $1,163,458 gain on extinguishment of debt as a result of an exchange of common stock for an unsecured note payable with a principal balance of $1,550,000 and unpaid interest of $99,458.

A gain of $96,542 was recognized on the settlement of accounts payable and other liabilities during 2016.

Interest income of $31,978 and $82,132 was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, from outstanding notes receivable and notes receivable from related parties.

Interest expense totaled $2,584,860 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $2,809,272 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $224,412. The decrease in interest expense is attributable to the decrease in debt outstanding during 2016 compared to the 2015. Capitalized interest on construction in progress related to renovations at our Southern Hills Retirement Center totaled $0 and $105,867 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

SUMMARY OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Certain of these accounting policies are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the consolidated financial statements set forth elsewhere in this report. These policies require application of judgment and assumptions by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty. Actual results could differ as a result of such judgment and assumptions.

Property Acquisitions

We allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to net tangible and identified intangible assets based on relative fair values. Fair value estimates are based on information obtained from independent appraisals, other market data, information obtained during due diligence and information related to the marketing and leasing at the specific property. Acquisition-related costs such as due diligence, legal and accounting fees are expensed as incurred. Initial valuations are subject to change during the measurement period, but the period ends as soon as the information is available. The measurement period shall not exceed one year from the date of acquisition.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

When circumstances indicate the carrying value of a property may not be recoverable, the Company reviews the asset for impairment. This review is based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property’s use and eventual disposition. This estimate considers factors such as expected future operating income, market and other applicable trends and residual value, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists, due to the inability to recover the carrying amount of the property, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. Estimated fair value is determined with the assistance from independent valuation specialists using recent sales of similar assets, market conditions or projected cash flows of properties using standard industry valuation techniques.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair values of the respective identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. Goodwill resulting from acquisitions is not amortized, but is tested for impairment annually or whenever events change and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that an impairment loss has occurred using specific methods described in U.S. GAAP. As allowed by U.S. GAAP, management initially performs a qualitative analysis of goodwill using qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount including goodwill. Such qualitative factors include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance and other relevant entity-specific events. If after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, the Company determines through the qualitative assessment that the fair value of a reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its carrying value, no further evaluation is necessary, and performing the two-step impairment test outlined in U.S. GAAP is not required.

Notes Receivable and Notes Receivable – Related Parties

The Company evaluates its notes receivable for impairment when it is probable the payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the note receivable agreements. Once a note has been determined to be impaired, it is measured to establish the amount of the impairment, if any, based on the fair value, as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the note’s effective interest rate. If the fair value of the impaired note receivable is less than the recorded investment in the note, a valuation allowance is recognized.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Throughout its history, the Company has experienced shortages in working capital and has relied, from time to time, upon sales of debt and equity securities to meet cash demands generated by our acquisition activities.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $578,242 on hand. In June 2016, we sold our Greene Point facility for gross cash proceeds of $3.8 million. A portion of the proceeds were used to pay off an existing mortgage related to the facility in the amount of $1.7 million and related subordinated debt of $1,181,250. Our liquidity is expected to increase from potential equity and debt offerings and decrease as net offering proceeds are expended in connection with the acquisition of properties. Our continuing short-term liquidity requirements consisting primarily of operating expenses and debt service requirements, excluding balloon payments at maturity, are expected to be achieved from rental revenues received and existing cash on hand. We plan to renew senior debts that mature during 2017, as our projected cash flow from operations will be insufficient to retire the debt. Our restricted cash totaled $580,747 as of December 31, 2016 which is reserved for debt service associated with our Southern Hills Retirement Center.

Cash used in operating activities was $506,953 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to cash used in operating activities of $30,855 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Cash flows provided by operations in 2016 were negatively impacted by the decrease in rental revenues as a result of the bankruptcy filing of a lease operator and the closure of one facility.

Cash provided by investing activities was $2,222,738 and $352,373 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. During 2016, we issued a $150,000 note receivable, received collections of $573,428 from notes receivable – related parties, received proceeds from the sale of property and equipment in the amount of $2,112,970, and spent $313,660 on capital expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we issued a note receivable in the amount of $150,000 to a nursing home operator, collected $574,719 from notes receivable to related parties, received back $500,000 in earnest money on deposit related to a potential acquisition and expended $598,049 on construction related to our Southern Hills campus.

Cash used in financing activities was $1,208,598 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $784,060 for the year ended December 31, 2015. During 2016, we made payments on debt approximating $1.7 million and received proceeds from issuance of debt of $600,000. During 2015, we made payments on debt approximating $2.9 million, received proceeds from issuance of debt of approximately $2.6 million, and paid $440,779 in dividends on our common stock.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, our debt balances consisted of the following:

The weighted average interest rate and term of our fixed rate debt are 6.90% and 5.9 years, respectively, as of December 31, 2016. The weighted average interest rate and term of our variable rate debt are 5.8% and 15.4 years, respectively, as of December 31, 2016.

Mortgage Loans

Mortgage loans are collateralized by all assets of each nursing home property and an assignment of its rents. Collateral for certain mortgage loans includes the personal guarantee of Christopher Brogdon. Mortgage loans for the periods presented consisted of the following:

Other mortgage loans contain financial and non-financial covenants, including reporting obligations, with which the Company has not complied in some instances in an untimely manner.

We have $22.5 million of debt maturing during the year ending December 31, 2017. While we anticipate being able to refinance all the loans at reasonable market terms upon maturity, our inability to do so may impact our financial position and results of operations. We expect to refinance $7.8 million in mortgage loans maturing in 2017 as the associated properties meet loan to value requirements currently being employed in commercial lending markets. We have $2.4 million in subordinated debt maturing in 2017. See the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in the Form 10-K for additional debt details. The following is a summary of our subordinated debt at December 31, 2016 and 2015:

Subordinated Debt

Our subordinated debt at December 31, 2016 and 2015 includes unsecured notes payable issued to controlled entities used to facilitate the acquisition of the nursing home properties.

Other mortgage loans contain financial and non-financial covenants, including reporting obligations, with which the Company has complied in some instances in an untimely manner.

Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2016, we had the following contractual debt obligations:

Revenues from operations are sufficient to meet the working capital needs of the Company for the foreseeable future. Cash on hand, combined proceeds from the issuance of our 10% Senior Secured Promissory Notes in the aggregate amount of $725,000 during 2016 and 2017 and revenues generated from operations, are in excess of operating expenses and debt service requirements. Debt maturities are expected to be refinanced at reasonable terms upon maturity. The Company anticipates a combination of conventional mortgage loans, at market rates, issuance of revenue bonds and possibly additional equity injections to fund the acquisition cost of any additional properties. Except for renovations at Grand Prairie and Southern Hills Retirement Center, there are no material capital improvement or recurring capital expenditure commitments at the properties.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that we consider material.

Subsequent Events

Senior Note Offering

During the first quarter of 2017, we sold an additional $125,000 in Senior Notes and Warrants to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock, resulting in an aggregate of $725,000 in Senior Notes and Warrants being sold in the offering. 

Stock Based Compensation

During the first quarter of 2017, we issued to each of our five (5) Directors an aggregate of 52,632 shares of common stock, valued at $0.57 per share, as their annual compensation for the year 2017.

During the first quarter of 2017, we issued Mr. Baller, our CEO, an aggregate of 174,000 shares of common stock, valued at $0.40 per share, as compensation for his services as CEO for the third and fourth quarter of 2016.

During the first quarter of 2017, we issued to Mr. Rhine, our CFO, an aggregate of 87,000 shares of common stock, valued at $0.40 per share, as compensation for his services as CFO for the fourth quarter of 2016.

In April 2017, we issued Mr. Baller, our CEO, an aggregate of 86,364 shares of common stock, valued at $0.44 per share, for compensation for his services as CEO for the first quarter of 2017, and an additional 29,269 shares of common stock as a bonus for services rendered in connection with the Abbeville transaction described below.

In April 2017, we issued Mr. Rhine, our CFO, an aggregate of 86,364 shares of common stock, valued at $0.44 per share, for compensation for his services as CFO for the first quarter of 2017, and an additional 29,269 shares of common stock as a bonus for services rendered in connection with the Abbeville transaction described below.

Abbeville Health & Rehab

On April 4, 2017, we successfully bid at foreclosure sale to purchase a 101 bed skilled nursing facility located In Abbeville, Georgia. We formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Abbeville Property, LLC (“GAP”) for the purpose of bidding on the facility. Colony Bank, the senior lender on the facility, was the party undertaking the foreclosure in light of the default of the prior owner.

The purchase price for the Abbeville facility was $2.1 million which was entirely financed by Colony Bank through a newly approved closed-end revolving credit facility in the maximum amount of $2.6 million. The additional $500,000 under the credit line will be used for renovations on a dollar-for-dollar matching basis. Consummation of the Abbeville purchase will likely occur in the third quarter of 2017.

The facility was closed in March 2016 due to uncured deficiencies. On March 17, 2017, in anticipation of our purchase of the facility, the State of Georgia approved a six month conditional Certificate of Need (“CON”) to allow us to complete renovations and reopen the property. Under ASC 805 and 805.50, management determined that the transaction, once completed, will be accounted for as an acquisition of asset, not an acquisition of business, because it includes business input but not a process or output.

Renewal of Senior Note on Goodwill

In the first quarter of 2017, we renewed our senior loan with First Commercial Bank for an additional three (3) years. The renewed note bears interest at a rate of 5.50% and requires 35 monthly payments of principal and interest in the amount of $27,982 and a final payment of principal and unpaid interest at maturity on March 19, 2020.

Not applicable.

See the index included at Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

None.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as of the end of the period covered by this Report, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Act of 1934. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, relating to the Company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, and was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date to provide assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosures.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2016. Our CEO and CFO concluded we have a material weakness due to lack of segregation of duties and a limited corporate governance structure. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our size has prevented us from being able to employ sufficient resources to enable us to have an adequate level of supervision and segregation of duties within our system of internal control. Therefore, while there are some compensating controls in place, it is difficult to ensure effective segregation of accounting and financial reporting duties. Management reported a material weakness resulting from the combination of the following significant deficiencies:

While we strive to segregate duties as much as practicable, there is an insufficient volume of transactions at this point in time to justify additional full time staff. We believe that this is typical in many new ventures. We may not be able to fully remediate the material weakness until we hire more staff. We will continue to monitor and assess the costs and benefits of additional staffing.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the SEC rules that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

None.

PART III

Directors and Executive Officers

The name, position with the Company, age of each Director and executive officer of the Company is as follows:

Lance Baller, age 43, serves as a director and sole or principal shareholder of several privately owned businesses, including Baller Enterprises, Inc. from 1993 to the present (personal holding company), High Speed Mines, LLC and High Speed Aggregate, LLC (gold, sand, rock and gravel mining), RM Investments, LLC (fast food real estate), HSA Bedrock, LLC (landscape material supply) and Baller Family Foundation, Inc. (personal family foundation). He is also the co-founder, former CEO and President of Iofina plc, a technology leader in the production of iodine and iodine derivatives, where he continues to serve as Chairman. He is the former managing partner of Shortline Equity Partners, Inc. (2004 to 2010), a mid-market merger and acquisitions consulting and investment company. Mr. Baller is also the former Managing Partner of Elevation Capital Management, LLC (2005 to 2010) and is the former alternative investment hedge fund manager of the Elevation Fund. He is also a former Vice-President of Corporate Development and Communications (2003 to 2004) of Integrated Biopharma, Inc. and prior to that a vice-president of the investment banking firms UBS and Morgan Stanley. He was also a director of Equal Earth, Inc. (2013 to 2014). He has served on numerous boards of directors of both private and public companies, including Index Asset Management, Inc., where he has served on the Board of Trustees since 2014.

Clifford L. Neuman has been engaged as a principal in his own law firms for over 43 years, emphasizing corporate and securities law in the representation of companies in matters of corporate finance, mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations and public and private offerings. Mr. Neuman has served on the boards of directors of numerous public, private and non-profit companies and has been actively involved in the process of capital formation on behalf of his clients for many years. He is also the President of Gemini Gaming, Inc., which owns and operates a gaming casino in Blackhawk, Colorado. He currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Medicine Horse Program, a non-profit equine assisted psychotherapy facility in Boulder, a Director and CEO of Mindfulness Peace Project, f/k/a Ratna Foundation, a non-profit charitable foundation, and a member of the Governing Council of Shambhala Mountain Center, a non-profit retreat center in Red Feather Lakes, Colorado. Mr. Neuman received his Juris Doctorate degree from the University of Pennsylvania (1973) and his Bachelor of Arts degree, magna cum laude from Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut (1970), where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa.

Andrew L. Sink is currently the Managing Director of the Investment Advisory division and Principal for Colliers International | Alabama. His team provides investment property advisory, investment property brokerage, investment fund structuring and real estate investment management to high net worth families and individuals. His team also provides advisory services to privately held operating companies seeking to enhance enterprise value via various real estate strategies including sale leaseback and private fund structuring. Mr. Sink has more than 20 years’ experience in the real estate industry with a broad range of expertise in real estate brokerage and investments. Prior to his role at Colliers International, Mr. Sink was Managing Director of Founders Investment Properties (FIP) which spun out of Founders Investment Banking in December 2011. Prior to the formation of FIP, Mr. Sink was a partner at Founders Investment Banking, LLC where he served as Managing Director of the firm’s real estate advisory practice from 2004-2011. During this same time period he and his partners formed Foundation Fund Management Company (FFMC). FFMC has created multiple niche private equity funds, which included Foundation Sale Leaseback Fund, Foundation Cypress Development Fund, Foundation Retail Development Fund, Foundation Residential Acquisition Fund and Foundation New Media Fund. Prior to joining Founders, he was a partner in the commercial real estate firm Eason, Graham & Sandner, Inc. (EGS) from 1993-2004 and was responsible for the Industrial Services Division. Mr. Sink earned a Bachelor of Science degree in finance with a concentration in real estate from the University of Alabama, graduating in 1990. He holds a state of Alabama real estate broker’s license.

Zvi Rhine , age 37, has over 15 years of experience in the securities industry. He is the principal and managing member of Sabra Capital Partners which he founded in 2012, a multi-strategy hedge fund that focuses on event-driven, value and special situations investments primarily in North America. Prior to founding Sabra Capital Partners, he worked at Hilco Trading concentrating on asset-backed investments and sale-leaseback transactions. From 2005 to 2008, he was a Director of Boone Capital, an event-driven hedge fund concentrating on small to mid-cap companies. Mr. Rhine has also worked in various investment capacities for Banc of America Securities and US Bancorp Piper Jaffray. He is a graduate of the University of Illinois.

Adam Desmond, age 46, is the founder and CEO of Needle Rock Capital, an investment banking firm located in Carbondale, Colorado. Prior to founding Needle Rock Capital, Mr. Desmond founded ASG Securities in 1998 that focused exclusively on small/mid-cap banks and thrift markets. In 2004 ASG Securities became FIG Partners LLC which expanded the business from a sales and trading platform to a full-service investment banking firm. Mr. Desmond assembled a team of principals at Fig Partners that raised over $2.5 billion in equity since 2007 and completed more than 95 whole bank transactions throughout the United States, with offices in Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Dallas, New Jersey and Charlotte, employing over 60 people. Mr. Desmond began his career at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in the financial quadrant and went on to Raymond James and Associates where he helped develop a high yield fixed income department. Mr. Desmond enjoys supporting and servicing many charitable organizations, including helping fund the building of a school in the Philippines through St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Aspen, Colorado. Mr. Desmond is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin – Madison with a Bachelor of Arts in International Economics and Political Science.

Family Relationships

None.

Board Meeting and Compensation

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, meetings of the Board of Directors were held both in person and telephonically, and business of the board was also conducted by written unanimous consent. There were four meetings of the Board during 2016. All Board members attended 100% of the Board meetings. Directors are entitled to reimbursement of their expenses associated with attendance at such meeting or otherwise incurred in connection with the discharge of their duties as a Director.

During fiscal 2016, the entire Board of Directors assumed all responsibilities of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees. The board had no formal standing committees, but plans to create those committees when it determines that those committees would be beneficial. No member of the Audit, Compensation or Nominating Committees will receive any additional compensation for his service as a member of that Committee.

During fiscal 2014, the Board adopted the Director Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to which each Director of the Company, whether or not independent, and whether or not such Director holds any other position with the Company, including any position as an executive officer, shall be entitled to an annual grant of restricted common stock in compensation for services during the year of grant, determined as follows:

The first grant under the Plan was effective January 1, 2015, and consisted of 33,333 shares of restricted common stock issued to each Director of the five directors on that date, for a total of166,665 shares. Two additional directors joined the Board during the year and received 17,442 shares each, for a total 34,884 shares. For the year, a total of 201,549 shares were issued under the Plan. The second grant date was effective January 1, 2016, and consisted of 45,455 shares of restricted common stock issued to each of the five Directors on that date, for a total of 227,275 shares issued to date under the Plan for 2016. The third grant date was January 1, 2017, and consisted of 52,632 shares of common stock issued to each of the five Directors, for a total of 263,160 shares issued under the Plan for 2017.

Director Independence

Our common stock is listed on the OTCQB inter-dealer quotation systems, which does not have director independence requirements. Nevertheless, for purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definition set forth in NASDAQ Rule 4200(a)(15). Mr. Andy Sink and Mr. Adam Desmond would be considered “independent” under the NASDAQ rule.

Audit Committee

The Board as a whole serves as the audit committee.

For this purpose, an audit committee member is deemed to be independent if he does not possess any vested interests related to those of management and does not have any financial, family or other material personal ties to management.

The committee is responsible for accounting and internal control matters. The audit committee:

In addition to its regular activities, the committee is available to meet with the independent registered public accounting firm or controller whenever a special situation arises.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors will adopt a written charter, which, when adopted, will be filed with the Commission.

Compensation Advisory Committee

The composition of the compensation advisory committee has not been determined.

The compensation advisory committee did not meet during fiscal 2016. The compensation advisory committee will, when appointed:

Nomination Process

The Board of Directors has not appointed a standing nomination committee and does not intend to do so during the upcoming year. The process of determining director nominees has been addressed by the board as a whole, which consists of five members. The board has not adopted a charter to govern the director nomination process.

The board of directors has not adopted a policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders, since to date the board has not received from any security holder a director nominee recommendation. The board of directors will consider candidates recommended by security holders in the future. Security holders wishing to recommended a director nominee for consideration should contact Mr. Lance Baller, Interim President, at the Company’s principal executive offices located in Greenwood Village, Colorado and provide to Mr. Baller, in writing, the recommended director nominee’s professional resume covering all activities during the past five years, the information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K, and a statement of the reasons why the security holder is making the recommendation. Such recommendation must be received by the Company before December 31, 2017.

The board of directors believes that any director nominee must possess significant experience in business and/or financial matters as well as a particular interest in the Company’s activities.

Shareholder Communications

Any shareholder of the Company wishing to communicate to the board of directors may do so by sending written communication to the board of directors to the attention of Mr. Lance Baller, Interim President, at the principal executive offices of the Company. The board of directors will consider any such written communication at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

Any transactions between the Company and its officers, directors, principal shareholders, or other affiliates have been and will be on terms no less favorable to the Company than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties on an arms-length basis and will be approved by a majority of the Company’s independent, outside disinterested directors.

Code of Ethics

Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all of our directors, officers and employees during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. We will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Such request should be made in writing and addressed to Investor Relations, Global Healthcare REIT, Inc., at the Company’s principal executive offices located in Greenwood Village, Colorado. Further, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 and can be reviewed on the website maintained by the SEC at www.SEC.gov.

There are no material proceedings to which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent (5%) of any class of voting securities of the Company, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

During the last ten (10) years no director or officer of the Company has:

(1) had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

(2) been convicted in a criminal proceeding or subject to a pending criminal proceeding;

(3) been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

(4) been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action, the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Any transactions between the Company and its officers, directors, principal shareholders, or other affiliates have been and will be on terms no less favorable to the Company than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties on an arms-length basis and will be approved by a majority of the Company’s independent, outside disinterested directors.

Indemnification and Limitation on Liability of Directors

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the Company shall indemnify, to the fullest extent permitted by Utah law, any director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation made or threatened to be made a party to a proceeding, by reason of the former or present official of the person, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses incurred by the person in connection with the proceeding if certain standards are met. At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any director, officer, employee or agent of the Company where indemnification will be required or permitted. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation limit the liability of its directors to the fullest extent permitted by the Utah Business Corporation Act. Specifically, directors of the Company will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as directors, except for (i) any breach of the duty of loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or that involved intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) dividends or other distributions of corporate assets that are in contravention of certain statutory or contractual restrictions, (iv) violations of certain laws, or (v) any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit. Liability under federal securities law is not limited by the Articles. The officers of the Company will dedicate sufficient time to fulfill their fiduciary obligations to the Company’s affairs. The Company has no retirement, pension or profit sharing plans for its officers and Directors.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Under the securities laws of the United States, the Company’s Directors, its Executive (and certain other) Officers, and any persons holding more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s common stock are required to report their ownership of the Company’s common stock and any changes in that ownership to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Specific due dates for these reports have been established and the Company is required to report in this Report any failure to file by these dates. All of these filing requirements were satisfied by our Officers, Directors, and ten-percent holders except for Mr. Bathgate, former Director, failed to file one (1) report covering one (1) transaction in a timely fashion; Mr. Baller failed to file two (2) reports covering four (4) transactions in a timely fashion; Mr. Sink and Mr. Rhine each failed to file one (1) report covering one (1) transaction in a timely fashion; Mr. Neuman failed to file two (2) reports covering two (2) transactions in a timely fashion and Mr. Taylor failed to file one (1) report covering one (1) transaction in a timely fashion. In making these statements, the Company has relied on the written representation of its Directors and Officers or copies of the reports that they have filed with the Commission.

ITEM 11.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Components of Compensation. The CEO and CFO receive exclusively stock based compensation. Each is granted restricted shares of common stock valued at $38,000 at the conclusion of each calendar quarter. We did not provide additional compensation in the form of annual incentive bonus, long term incentives, retirement benefits, or perquisites.

The following table and discussion set forth information with respect to all plan and non-plan compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and the Company’s four (4) most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO, for all services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries for each of the Company’s last three (3) completed fiscal years; provided, however, that no disclosure has been made for any executive officer, other than the CEO, whose total annual salary and bonus does not exceed $100,000.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Director Compensation

During fiscal 2014, the Board adopted the Director Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to which each Director of the Company, whether or not independent, and whether or not such Director holds any other position with the Company, including any position as an executive officer, shall be entitled to an annual grant of restricted common stock in compensation for services during the year of grant, determined as follows:

The first grant under the Plan was effective January 1, 2015, and consisted of 33,333 shares of restricted common stock issued to each Director of the five directors on that date, for a total of 166,665 shares. Two additional directors joined the Board during the year and received 17,442 shares each, for a total 34,884 shares. For the year, a total of 201,549 shares were issued under the Plan. The second grant date was effective January 1, 2016, and consisted of 45,455 shares of restricted common stock issued to each of the five Directors on that date, for a total of 227,275 shares issued to date under the Plan for 2016. The third grant date was January 1, 2017, and consisted of 52,632 shares of common stock issued to each of the five Directors, for a total of 263,160 shares issued under the Plan for 2017.

Company Stock Incentive Plans

In 1993, the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of the Company adopted the Global Casinos, Inc., Stock Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”). An aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock is reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2016, no options were outstanding under the Plan and all options to purchase shares of Common Stock have expired. The Plan has terminated in accordance with its terms, and as a result no shares are available for future option grants.

Equity Awards at Year End

There were no unexercised options, unvested stock awards or equity incentive plan awards for any named executive officer outstanding as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year.

Stock Based Compensation

In March 2015, the Board of Directors appointed Ryan Scates to the office of Executive Vice President. In consideration of his services, Mr. Scates received $10,000 per quarter, payable in arrears in restricted shares of common stock valued at the closing price of the common stock on the last day of each quarter. For the year ended December 31, 2015, Mr. Scates was issued 16,601 shares of common stock with a fair value of $14,667.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, Messrs. Baller, Rhine and Sink were each granted 250,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $0.40 per share as stock based compensation for services rendered in their capacities of CEO, CFO and COO, respectively.

For the third and fourth quarter of 2016, Messrs. Baller and Rhine were each granted 87,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $38,000 per quarter for services rendered in their capacities of CEO and CFO, respectively.

The following table sets forth, as of April 14, 2017 the stock ownership of (i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of five (5%) percent or more of the Company’s Common Stock, (ii) all Directors individually, (iii) all Officers individually, and (iv) all Directors and Officers as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown, except as noted. In presenting the information contained in this Item 12, the Company has relied upon publicly available reports of beneficial ownership filed by persons required to do so pursuant to Section 13 of the Exchange Act.

Throughout its history, the Company has experienced shortages in working capital and has relied, from time to time, upon loans from affiliates to meet immediate cash demands. There can be no assurance that these affiliates or other related parties will continue to provide funds to the Company in the future, as there is no legal obligation to provide such loans.

Equity Compensation

During 2016, Messrs. Sink, Bathgate, Neuman, Rhine and Baller were each granted 45,455 shares valued at $0.71 per share of restricted stock awards for services as directors; Messrs. Sink, Rhine and Baller were each granted 250,000 shares of restricted common stock in consideration for services provided as executive officers for the six months ended June 30, 2016; and Mr. Rhine and Mr. Baller were each granted shares of restricted common stock valued at $38,000 ($0.41 per share) for services in their capacities as CFO and CEO, respectively, for each of the third and fourth quarters of 2016. Mr. Neuman was issued 250,000 in August 2016 in satisfaction of $100,000 in accrued billings for services rendered as legal counsel.

Related Party Transactions

Christopher Brogdon was a member of the Company’s board of directors and also the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company until his resignation on November 20, 2015.

Prior to June 30, 2013, the Company acquired an unsecured, interest free receivable due from Christopher Brogdon totaling $500,000. On September 16, 2014, the receivable due from a former affiliate was exchanged for a 62.5% membership interest in Edwards Redeemer Property Holding, LLC. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had advances to Christopher Brogdon in the amount of $0 and $53,211. During 2015, the Company determined that advances in the amount of $53,211 were no longer collectible and were recognized as a bad debt expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Christopher Brogdon was the managing member of GWH Investors, LLC, Redeemer Investors, LLC, Providence HR Investors, LLC, 1321 Investors, LLC, GLN Investors, LLC and Dodge Investors, LLC until his resignation on November 20, 2015. As described elsewhere in this Report and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has or had notes payable to these entities.

For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company made advances to certain companies affiliated with Christopher Brogdon in the amount of $80,000 and $812,074, respectively. During 2015 and 2014, the Company determined that certain advances to these related parties were no longer collectible based on their ability to repay. Accordingly, the Company recorded $380,000 and $440,219 as bad debt expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had advances to these related parties of $0 and $300,000, respectively.

Cliff Neuman is a manager and member of Gemini Gaming, LLC. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had a note receivable with Gemini Gaming, LLC with an outstanding amount, net of discount, of $573,428 and $590,500, respectively. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company collected an aggregate of $573,428 in repayment of the note from Gemini Gaming, LLC which the Company accepted in full satisfaction of the total outstanding liability under the note. The transaction resulted in the Company recognizing a nominal bad debt expense in the amount of $9,044 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

In connection with its private placement of common stock described elsewhere in this report, the Company engaged the services of GVC Capital, LLC, (GVC”) a registered broker-dealer and FINRA member to serve as Placement Agent. GVC was paid a Placement Agent fee in the offering in the aggregate amount of $415,627, a non-accountable expense allowance in the aggregate amount of $134,392 and expense reimbursement in the aggregate amount of $17,088. Steven Bathgate, a director, is the senior managing member of GVC and as a result had a financial interest in the payments made to GVC. In addition, GVC was issued warrants to purchase shares of common stock equal to 10% of the shares sold in the offering. Mr. Bathgate’s share of those warrants are set forth in this Report in the section heading Security Ownership of Management and Principal Shareholders.

In the fourth quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2017, the Company undertook a private offering (“Offering”) of Units, each Unit consisting of a 10% Senior Secured Note and one warrant for every dollar in principal amount of Note purchased. In the Offering, Ultimate Investments, Ltd and the Baller Family Foundation, Inc., each entity controlled by Mr, Baller, each invested $100,000. Zvi Rhine invested $50,000, while his brother David Rhine invested $50,000 and his father Gary Rhine invested $25,000. In addition, Adam Desmond invested $100,000 in the Offering and his father Robert Desmond invested $150,000.

The following table details the aggregate fees billed to the Company by MaloneBailey, LLP, its current registered independent public accounting firm, since their appointment in 2015:

The caption “Audit Fees” includes professional services rendered for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements and the review of the quarterly interim consolidated financial statements.

It is the policy of the Board of Directors, acting as the audit committee, to pre-approve all services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

PART IV

ITEM 15.     EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report:

(a) Financial Statement Schedules

See the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements at page F-1 of this report.

The following financial statement schedule is included herein at page F-39 of this report:

Schedule III – Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation