SHORE BANCSHARES INC - Quarter Report: 2005 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2005
OR
o |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
transition period from ________ to ________
Commission
file number 0-22345
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
|
52-1974638
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
18
East Dover Street, Easton, Maryland
|
21601
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(410)
822-1400
Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code
N/A
Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days Yes xNo
o
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes xNo
o
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date: 5,544,396 issued and outstanding
shares of common stock as of August 1, 2005.
INDEX
Part
I.
|
Financial
Information
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets -
|
|
|
June
30, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income -
|
|
|
For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
-
|
|
|
For
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
|
|
|
For
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|
|
and
Results of Operations
|
10
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
15
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
16
|
|
|
|
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
16
|
|
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
16
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
17
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
List
|
|
-
2
-
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements.
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
ASSETS: |
(unaudited)
|
||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
25,202
|
$
|
22,051
|
|||
Interest
bearing deposits with other banks
|
848
|
961
|
|||||
Federal
funds sold
|
22,630
|
20,539
|
|||||
Investment
securities:
|
|||||||
Held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost (fair value of, $15,052 and
|
|||||||
$15,802,
respectively)
|
14,871
|
15,662
|
|||||
Available
for sale, at fair value
|
105,838
|
103,434
|
|||||
Loans,
less allowance for credit losses ($4,860 and
|
|||||||
$4,692,
respectively)
|
610,974
|
590,766
|
|||||
Insurance
premiums receivable
|
863
|
386
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
14,310
|
13,070
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable on loans and investment securities
|
3,599
|
3,275
|
|||||
Investment
in unconsolidated subsidiary
|
899
|
859
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
11,939
|
11,939
|
|||||
Other
intangible assets
|
2,074
|
2,242
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,663
|
1,543
|
|||||
Other
real estate owned
|
391
|
391
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
3,694
|
3,480
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
819,795
|
$
|
790,598
|
|||
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Noninterest
bearing demand
|
$
|
104,831
|
$
|
102,672
|
|||
NOW
and Super NOW
|
110,049
|
112,327
|
|||||
Certificates
of deposit $100,000 or more
|
93,786
|
91,315
|
|||||
Other
time and savings
|
374,748
|
352,358
|
|||||
Total
Deposits
|
683,414
|
658,672
|
|||||
Accrued
Interest Payable
|
833
|
630
|
|||||
Short
term borrowings
|
28,757
|
27,106
|
|||||
Long
term debt
|
5,000
|
5,000
|
|||||
Contingent
earn-out payments payable
|
513
|
3,313
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
3,350
|
2,901
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
721,867
|
697,622
|
|||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, par value $.01; authorized 35,000,000 shares;
|
|||||||
issued
and outstanding:
|
|||||||
June
30,
2005
5,541,193
|
|||||||
December
31, 2004 5,515,198
|
55
|
55
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
28,689
|
28,017
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
69,690
|
65,182
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(506
|
)
|
(278
|
)
|
|||
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
97,928
|
92,976
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
819,795
|
$
|
790,598
|
See
accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-
3
-
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
months ended June 30,
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||
INTEREST
INCOME
|
|||||||||||||
Loans,
including fees
|
$
|
10,195
|
$
|
8,013
|
$
|
19,794
|
$
|
15,162
|
|||||
Interest
and dividends on investment securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Taxable
|
939
|
1,099
|
1,809
|
2,292
|
|||||||||
Tax-exempt
|
144
|
150
|
293
|
304
|
|||||||||
Other
interest income
|
212
|
83
|
401
|
137
|
|||||||||
Total
interest income
|
11,490
|
9,345
|
22,297
|
17,895
|
|||||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit, $100,000 or more
|
787
|
584
|
1,512
|
1,141
|
|||||||||
Other
deposits
|
1,792
|
1,569
|
3,446
|
3,040
|
|||||||||
Other
interest
|
181
|
105
|
332
|
205
|
|||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
2,760
|
2,258
|
5,290
|
4,386
|
|||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME
|
8,730
|
7,087
|
17,007
|
13,509
|
|||||||||
PROVISION
FOR CREDIT LOSSES
|
180
|
100
|
360
|
205
|
|||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR
|
|||||||||||||
CREDIT
LOSSES
|
8,550
|
6,987
|
16,647
|
13,304
|
|||||||||
NONINTEREST
INCOME
|
|||||||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
727
|
658
|
1,289
|
1,153
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of securities
|
—
|
(2
|
)
|
58
|
14
|
||||||||
Insurance
agency commissions
|
1,704
|
1,499
|
3,788
|
3,408
|
|||||||||
Other
noninterest income
|
607
|
497
|
1,065
|
955
|
|||||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
3,038
|
2,652
|
6,200
|
5,530
|
|||||||||
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
3,736
|
3,530
|
7,715
|
6,648
|
|||||||||
Expenses
of premises and equipment
|
637
|
574
|
1,292
|
1,163
|
|||||||||
Other
noninterest expense
|
1,706
|
1,482
|
3,365
|
2,988
|
|||||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
6,079
|
5,586
|
12,372
|
10,799
|
|||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE TAXES ON INCOME
|
5,509
|
4,053
|
10,475
|
8,035
|
|||||||||
Federal
and state income tax expense
|
2,008
|
1,453
|
3,868
|
2,919
|
|||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$
|
3,501
|
$
|
2,600
|
$
|
6,607
|
$
|
5,116
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$
|
.63
|
$
|
.47
|
$
|
1.20
|
$
|
.94
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$
|
.63
|
$
|
.47
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
.93
|
|||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$
|
.19
|
$
|
.18
|
$
|
.38
|
$
|
.36
|
See
accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
-
4
-
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Common
|
Paid
in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders’
|
||||||||||||
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income(loss)
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||
Balances,
January 1, 2004
|
$
|
54
|
$
|
24,231
|
$
|
58,932
|
$
|
310
|
$
|
83,527
|
||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
—
|
—
|
5,116
|
—
|
5,116
|
|||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on available for sale
|
||||||||||||||||
securities
, net of reclassification
|
||||||||||||||||
adjustment
of $242
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,541
|
)
|
(1,541
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
3,575
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
issued
|
1
|
3,719
|
—
|
—
|
3,720
|
|||||||||||
Cash
dividends paid $0.36 per share
|
—
|
—
|
(1,964
|
)
|
—
|
(1,964
|
)
|
|||||||||
Balances,
June 30, 2004
|
$
|
55
|
$
|
27,950
|
$
|
62,084
|
$
|
(1,231
|
)
|
$
|
88,858
|
|||||
Balances,
January 1, 2005
|
$
|
55
|
$
|
28,017
|
$
|
65,182
|
$
|
(278
|
)
|
$
|
92,976
|
|||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
—
|
—
|
6,607
|
—
|
6,607
|
|||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on available for sale
|
||||||||||||||||
securities,
net of reclassification
|
||||||||||||||||
adjustment
of $56
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(228
|
)
|
(228
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
6,379
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
issued
|
—
|
672
|
—
|
—
|
672
|
|||||||||||
Cash
dividends paid $0.38 per share
|
—
|
—
|
(2,099
|
)
|
—
|
(2,099
|
)
|
|||||||||
Balances,
June 30, 2005
|
$
|
55
|
$
|
28,689
|
$
|
69,690
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
$
|
97,928
|
See
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-
5
-
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Dollars
in thousands)
For
the Six Months Ended June
30,
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
6,607
|
$
|
5,116
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
|
|||||||
operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
729
|
717
|
|||||
Discount
accretion on debt securities
|
(54
|
)
|
(51
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for credit losses
|
360
|
205
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of securities
|
(58
|
)
|
(14
|
)
|
|||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary
|
(40
|
)
|
(20
|
)
|
|||
Net
changes in:
|
|||||||
Insurance
premiums receivable
|
(467
|
)
|
202
|
||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
(324
|
)
|
232
|
||||
Other
assets
|
(200
|
)
|
(689
|
)
|
|||
Accrued
interest payable on deposits
|
203
|
25
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
449
|
274
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
7,205
|
5,997
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from maturities and principal payments of securities
|
|||||||
available
for sale
|
10,270
|
39,360
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of investment securities available for sale
|
2,010
|
7,867
|
|||||
Purchase
of securities available for sale
|
(15,028
|
)
|
(17,682
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from maturities and principal payments of securities
|
|||||||
held
to maturity
|
778
|
1,287
|
|||||
Purchase
of securities held to maturity
|
—
|
(1,340
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase in loans
|
(20,567
|
)
|
(38,627
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of premises and equipment
|
(1,705
|
)
|
(697
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of other real estate owned
|
—
|
(60
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of investment in unconsolidated subsidiary
|
—
|
380
|
|||||
Acquisition
net of stock issued
|
—
|
(235
|
)
|
||||
Deferred
earn out payment, net of stock issued
|
(2,400
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(26,642
|
)
|
(9,747
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
increase in demand, NOW, money market and
|
|||||||
savings
deposits
|
8,004
|
872
|
|||||
Net
increase in certificates of deposit
|
16,737
|
11,017
|
|||||
Net
increase in securities sold under agreement to repurchase
|
1,651
|
7,768
|
|||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
273
|
511
|
|||||
Dividends
paid
|
(2,099
|
)
|
(1,964
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
24,566
|
18,204
|
|||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
5,129
|
14,454
|
|||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
43,551
|
46,731
|
|||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
48,680
|
$
|
61,185
|
See
accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
-
6
-
Shore
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes
to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For
the
Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
1)
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Shore
Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries with all significant
intercompany transactions eliminated. The consolidated financial
statements conform to accounting principles generally accepted
in the
United States of America and to prevailing practices within
the banking
industry. The accompanying interim financial statements are
unaudited;
however, in the opinion of management all adjustments necessary
to present
fairly the financial position at June 30, 2005, the results
of operations
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and
2004, the
changes in stockholders’ equity for the six-months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004, and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30,
2005 and
2004, have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal
recurring
nature. The amounts as of December 31, 2004 were derived from
audited
financial statements. The results of operations for the three
and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative
of
the results to be expected for any other interim period or
for the full
year. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in
conjunction
with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004.
|
2)
|
Year
to date basic earnings per share is derived by dividing net income
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number
of common
shares outstanding during the period. The diluted earnings per
share
calculation is derived by dividing net income by the weighted
average
number of shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for
the dilutive
effect of outstanding stock options. Information relating to
the
calculation of earnings per share is summarized as
follows:
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share
data)
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
3,501
|
$
|
2,600
|
$
|
6,607
|
$
|
5,116
|
|||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding - Basic
|
5,531
|
5,496
|
5,525
|
5,452
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
securities
|
35
|
43
|
37
|
46
|
|||||||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding - Diluted
|
5,566
|
5,539
|
5,562
|
5,498
|
|||||||||
Net
income per common share - Basic
|
$
|
0.63
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
1.20
|
$
|
.94
|
|||||
Net
income per common share - Diluted
|
$
|
0.63
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
.93
|
As
of
June 30, 2005 and 2004, there were 4,000 shares excluded from the diluted
net
income per share computations because the option price exceeded the average
market price and therefore, their effect would be anti-dilutive.
3)
|
Under
the provisions of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) Nos.
114 and 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,"
a loan is
considered impaired if it is probable that the Company will
not collect
all principal and interest payments according to the loan’s contracted
terms. The impairment of a loan is measured at the present
value of
expected future cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate, or at
the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral
if
the loan is collateral dependent. Interest income generally
is not
recognized on specific impaired loans unless the likelihood
of further
loss is remote. Interest payments received on such loans are
applied as a
reduction of the loans principal balance. Interest income on
other
nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent of interest
payments
received.
|
-
7
-
Information
with respect to impaired loans and the related valuation allowance is shown
below:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Impaired
loans with valuation allowance
|
$
|
846
|
$
|
1,246
|
|||
Impaired
loans with no valuation allowance
|
94
|
223
|
|||||
Total
impaired loans
|
$
|
940
|
$
|
1,469
|
|||
Allowance
for credit losses applicable to impaired loans
|
$
|
346
|
$
|
442
|
|||
Allowance
for credit losses applicable to other than impaired loans
|
4,514
|
4,250
|
|||||
Total
allowance for credit losses
|
$
|
4,860
|
$
|
4,692
|
|||
Interest
income on impaired loans recorded on the cash basis
|
$
|
102
|
$
|
11
|
Interest
income on impaired loans recorded on the cash basis $
102 $
11
Impaired
loans do not include groups of smaller balance homogenous loans such as
residential mortgage and consumer installment loans that are evaluated
collectively for impairment. Reserves for probable credit losses related to
these loans are based upon historical loss ratios and are included in the
allowance for credit losses.
4) |
In
the normal course of business, to meet the financial needs of its
customers, the Company’s bank subsidiaries are parties to financial
instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments
include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
At
June 30, 2005, total commitments to extend credit were approximately
$164,209,000. Outstanding letters of credit were approximately $19,521,000
at June 30, 2005.
|
5) |
The
Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-based Compensation” and related interpretations in
accounting for its stock compensation plans. No compensation expense
related to the plans was recorded during the three- and six-month
periods
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. If the Company had elected to recognize
compensation cost based on fair value at the vesting dates for awards
under the plans consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No.
123, net
income and earnings per share would have been changed to the pro
forma
amounts as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share
data):
|
Three-Month
Period Ended June
30,
|
Six-Month
Period Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||
Net
income:
|
|||||||||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
3,501
|
$
|
2,600
|
$
|
6,607
|
$
|
5,116
|
|||||
Less
pro forma stock-based compensation
|
|||||||||||||
expense
determined under the fair value
|
|||||||||||||
method,
net of related tax effects
|
(7
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
(36
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
|||||
Pro
forma net income
|
$
|
3,494
|
$
|
2,595
|
$
|
6,571
|
$
|
5,105
|
|||||
Basic
net income per share:
|
|||||||||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
.63
|
$
|
.47
|
$
|
1.20
|
$
|
.94
|
|||||
Pro
forma
|
.63
|
.47
|
1.19
|
.94
|
|||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|||||||||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
.63
|
$
|
.47
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
.93
|
|||||
Pro
forma
|
.63
|
.47
|
1.18
|
.93
|
6) |
The
Company operates two primary businesses: Community Banking and
Insurance
Products and Services. Through the Community Banking business,
the Company
provides services to consumers and small businesses on the Eastern
Shore
of Maryland and in Delaware through its 15-branch network. Community
banking activities include small business services, retail brokerage,
and
consumer banking products and services. Loan products available
to
consumers include mortgage, home equity, automobile, marine, and
installment loans, credit cards and other secured and unsecured
personal
lines of credit. Small business lending includes commercial mortgages,
real estate development loans, equipment and operating loans, as
well as
secured and unsecured lines of credit, credit cards, accounts receivable
financing arrangements, and merchant card services.
|
-
8
-
Through
the Insurance Products and Services business, the Company provides a full range
of insurance products and services to businesses and consumers in the Company’s
market areas. Products include property and casualty, life, marine, individual
health and long-term care insurance. Pension and profit sharing plans and
retirement plans for executives and employees are available to suit the needs
of
individual businesses.
Selected
financial information by line of business for the six months ended June 30
is
included in the following table:
Community
|
Insurance
products
|
Parent
|
Intersegment
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
banking
|
and
services
|
Company(a)
|
Transactions
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest income
|
$
|
17,005
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
17,007
|
||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
360
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
360
|
|||||||||||
Net
interest income after provision
|
16,645
|
—
|
2
|
—
|
16,647
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
2,359
|
3,908
|
1,376
|
(1,443
|
)
|
6,200
|
||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
9,361
|
3,002
|
1,452
|
(1,443
|
)
|
12,372
|
||||||||||
Income
before taxes
|
9,643
|
906
|
(74
|
)
|
—
|
10,475
|
||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
3,539
|
358
|
(29
|
)
|
—
|
3,868
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
6,104
|
$
|
548
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
6,607
|
|||||
Intersegment
revenue(expense)
|
$
|
(1,221
|
)
|
$
|
(86
|
)
|
$
|
1,307
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Average
assets
|
$
|
792,963
|
$
|
8,892
|
$
|
3,471
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
805,326
|
||||||
2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest income
|
$
|
13,508
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
13,509
|
||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
205
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
205
|
|||||||||||
Net
interest income after provision
|
13,303
|
—
|
1
|
—
|
13,304
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
1,956
|
3,537
|
1,132
|
(1,095
|
)
|
5,530
|
||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
8,011
|
2,766
|
1,117
|
(1,095
|
)
|
10,799
|
||||||||||
Income
before taxes
|
7,248
|
771
|
16
|
—
|
8,035
|
|||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
2,608
|
305
|
6
|
—
|
2,919
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
4,640
|
$
|
466
|
10
|
—
|
$
|
5,116
|
||||||||
Intersegment
revenue(expense)
|
$
|
(978
|
)
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
$
|
1,080
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Average
assets
|
$
|
755,625
|
$
|
6,830
|
$
|
3,289
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
765,744
|
(a) |
Amount
included in Parent Company relates to services provided to subsidiaries
by
the Company and rental income.
|
7)
|
On
April 1, 2004, the Company completed its merger with Midstate Bancorp,
Inc., a Delaware bank holding company (“Midstate Bancorp”). Pursuant to
the merger agreement, each share of common stock of Midstate Bancorp
was
converted into the right to receive (i) $31.00 in cash, plus (ii)
0.8732
shares of the common stock of the Corporation, with cash being
paid in
lieu of fractional shares at the rate of $33.83 per share. The
Company
paid $2,953,710 in cash and issued 82,786 shares of common stock
to
stockholders of Midstate Bancorp in connection with the Merger.
The
Company recorded approximately $2,636,000 of Goodwill and $968,000
of
other intangible assets as a result of the
acquisition.
|
-
9
-
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Forward-Looking
Information
Portions
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements
within
the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical in nature, including
statements that include the words “anticipate,”“estimate,”“should,”
expect,”“believe,”“intend,” and similar expressions, are expressions about the
Company's confidence, policies,
and strategies, the adequacy of capital levels, and liquidity and are not
guarantees of future performance. Such forward-looking statements involve
certain risks and uncertainties, including economic conditions, competition
in
the geographic and business areas in which the Company operates, inflation,
fluctuations in interest rates, legislation, and governmental regulation.
These
risks and uncertainties are described in more detail in Exhibit 99.1 “Risk
Factors” to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004. Actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking
statements, and the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking
statements at any time.
Introduction
The
following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of significant
factors
affecting the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
and
its consolidated subsidiaries for the periods indicated. This discussion
and
analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and related notes presented elsewhere in this report,
as
well as the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004. Unless the context clearly suggests otherwise, references to the Company
in this report are to Shore Bancshares, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
The
Company is the largest independent financial holding company located on the
Eastern Shore of Maryland. It is the parent company of The Talbot Bank of
Easton, Maryland located in Easton, Maryland (“Talbot Bank”), The Centreville
National Bank of Maryland located in Centreville, Maryland (“Centreville
National Bank”), and The Felton Bank located in Felton, Delaware (“Felton Bank”
and collectively with Talbot Bank and Centreville National Bank, the “Banks”).
The Banks operate 15 full service branches in Kent, Queen Anne’s, Talbot,
Caroline and Dorchester Counties in Maryland and Kent County, Delaware. The
Company offers a full range of insurance products and services to its customers
through The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC, Elliott Wilson Insurance, LLC, and Mubell
Finance, LLC (collectively, the “Insurance Agency”) and investment advisory
services through Wye Financial Services, LLC, all of which are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of the Company. The shares of the Company’s common stock are listed
on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbol “SHBI.”
The
Company maintains an Internet site at www.shbi.net
on which
it makes available free of charge its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to
the
foregoing as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are
electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The
financial information contained within the financial statements requires
us to
make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the reported amount
of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates, assumptions,
and
judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial
statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements
could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies
inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and
judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that
could
be materially different than originally reported.
The
Company believes its most critical accounting policy relates to the allowance
for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is an estimate of the
losses
that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two
basic
principles of accounting: (i) SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, which
requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and
estimable, and (ii) SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment
of a
Loan, which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between
the
loan balance and the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows
or
values that are observable in the secondary market. Management uses many
factors, including economic conditions and trends, the value and adequacy
of
collateral, the volume and mix of the loan portfolio, and internal loan
processes of the Company in determining the inherent loss that may be present
in
the Company’s loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from
Management’s estimates. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously
acceptable method to another. Although the economics of transactions would
be
the same, the timing of events that would impact the transactions could
change.
-
10
-
Management
has significant discretion in making the adjustments inherent in the
determination of the provision and allowance for credit losses, including in
connection with the valuation of collateral, the borrower’s prospects of
repayment, and in establishing allowance factors on the formula allowance and
unallocated allowance components of the allowance. The establishment of
allowance factors is a continuing exercise, based on Management’s continuing
assessment of the totality of all factors, including, but not limited to, as
delinquencies, loss history, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of
changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of Management, national
and
local economic trends, concentrations of credit, quality of loan review system
and the effect of external factors such as competition and regulatory
requirements, and their impact on the portfolio, and allowance factors may
change from period to period, resulting in an increase or decrease in the amount
of the provision or allowance, based upon the same volume and classification
of
loans. Changes in allowance factors will have a direct impact on the amount
of
the provision, and a corresponding effect on net income. Errors in Management’s
perception and assessment of these factors and their impact on the portfolio
could result in the allowance not being adequate to cover losses in the
portfolio, and may result in additional provisions or charge-offs.
Three
basic components comprise the Company’s allowance for credit losses: (i) a
specific allowance; (ii) a formula allowance; and (iii) a nonspecific allowance.
Each component is determined based on estimates that can and do change when
the
actual events occur. The specific allowance is used to individually allocate
an
allowance to loans identified as impaired. An impaired loan may show
deficiencies in the borrower’s overall financial condition, payment history,
support available from financial guarantors and/or the fair market value of
collateral. When a loan is identified as impaired, a specific allowance is
established based on the Company’s assessment of the loss that may be associated
with the individual loan. The formula allowance is used to estimate the loss
on
internally risk rated loans, exclusive of those identified as impaired. Loans
identified as special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss, as well as
impaired, are segregated from performing loans. Remaining loans are then grouped
by type (commercial, commercial real estate, construction, home equity or
consumer). Each loan type is assigned an allowance factor based on Management’s
estimate of the risk, complexity and size of individual loans within a
particular category. Classified loans are assigned higher allowance factors
than
non-rated loans due to Management’s concerns regarding collectibility or
Management’s knowledge of particular elements regarding the borrower. Allowance
factors grow with the worsening of the internal risk rating. The nonspecific
formula is used to estimate the loss of non-classified loans stemming from
more
global factors such as delinquencies, loss history, trends in volume and terms
of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of
Management, national and local economic trends, concentrations of credit,
quality of loan review system and the effect of external factors such as
competition and regulatory requirements. The nonspecific allowance captures
losses whose impact on the portfolio have occurred but have yet to be recognized
in either the formula or specific allowance.
OVERVIEW
Net
income for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 was $3,501,000, or diluted earnings
per share of $.63, compared to $2,600,000, or diluted earnings per share of
$.47, for the second quarter of 2004. Net income for the six months ended June
30, 2005 was $6,607,000, a $1,491,000 increase over the same period in 2004.
On
a per share basis, diluted earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2005
were
$1.19, compared to $.93 for the same period last year. Annualized return on
average assets was 1.64% for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to
1.34% for the same period in 2004. Annualized return on average stockholders’
equity was 13.88% and 11.29% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Net
Interest Income
Net
interest income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 was
$8,730,000 and $17,007,000, respectively, an increase of $1,643,000, or 23.2%,
and $3,498,000, or 25.9%, respectively, when compared to the same periods last
year. These increases are attributable to a $31,705,000 increase in average
earning assets, concentrated in loans, and an overall increase in yields on
earning assets. Total interest income increased by $2,145,000 and $4,402,000
for
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively, when
compared to the same periods last year.
The
Company’s net interest margin was 4.60% for the six months ended June 30, 2005,
which is 77 basis points higher than the net interest margin for the same period
last year. The Company continued to increase its volume of earning assets,
which
averaged $746,990,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to
$715,285,000 for the same period in 2004. Average loans totaled $598,290,000
for
the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, a $64,293,000 increase over the same
period in 2004. The yield on earning assets for the six-month period ended
June
30, 2005 increased 97 basis points to 6.02% from 5.05% for the same period
last
year.
The
overall yield on loans for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 6.62%,
compared to 5.68% for the same period in 2004. The yield on investment
securities for the first six months of 2005 increased slightly to 3.77% from
3.63% for the same period in 2004, and the average balance of investment
securities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 decreased by $32,101,000
to $119,455,000 when compared to the same period in 2004.
-
11
-
Total
interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $2,760,000
and $5,290,000, respectively, an increase of $502,000 and $904,000,
respectively, over the same periods in 2004. An increased volume of interest
bearing deposits is the primary reason for the increased expense. The average
balance of interest bearing deposits increased by $20,172,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 when compared to the same period in 2004. The overall rate
paid for interest bearing deposits increased 22 basis points to 1.74% as a
result of higher rates paid for certificates of deposit. Rates paid for
certificates of deposit and short-term borrowings increased as a result of
higher short-term interest rates and increased competition for deposits. For
the
six months ended June 30, 2005, the average balance of certificates of deposits,
including those $100,000 or more, increased by $7,795,000 when compared to
the
same period last year, and the average rate paid for those certificates of
deposit increased 39 basis points to 3.03%. Comparing the first six months
of
2005 to the same period in 2004, average interest bearing demand deposits
increased by approximately $3,309,000 and average money management and savings
deposits increased by $9,068,000.
Loans
comprised 80.1% and 74.7% of total average earning assets for the six-months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Analysis
of Interest Rates and Interest Differentials.
The
following table presents the distribution of the average consolidated balance
sheets, interest income/expense, and annualized yields earned and rates paid
through the first six months of 2005:
Six
Months ended June 30, 2005
|
Six
Months ended June 30, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Income
|
Yield
|
Average
|
Income
|
Yield
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Rate
|
|||||||||||||
Earning
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
$
|
119,455
|
$
|
2,253
|
3.77
|
%
|
$
|
151,556
|
$
|
2,752
|
3.63
|
%
|
|||||||
Loans
|
598,290
|
19,812
|
6.62
|
%
|
533,997
|
15,178
|
5.68
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
951
|
11
|
2.39
|
%
|
7,589
|
34
|
0.90
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
28,294
|
390
|
2.75
|
%
|
22,143
|
103
|
0.93
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
earning assets
|
746,990
|
22,466
|
6.02
|
%
|
715,285
|
18,067
|
5.05
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
earning assets
|
58,336
|
50,459
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
805,326
|
$
|
765,744
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
$
|
570,778
|
4,958
|
1.74
|
%
|
$
|
550,606
|
4,181
|
1.52
|
%
|
|||||||||
Short
term borrowing
|
24,416
|
207
|
1.70
|
%
|
24,187
|
80
|
0.66
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Long
term debt
|
5,000
|
125
|
5.00
|
%
|
5,000
|
125
|
5.03
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
600,194
|
5,290
|
1.76
|
%
|
579,793
|
4,386
|
1.51
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing liabilities
|
109,949
|
95,288
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
95,183
|
90,663
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
805,326
|
$
|
765,744
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
$
|
17,176
|
4.26
|
%
|
$
|
13,681
|
3.54
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
4.60
|
%
|
3.83
|
%
|
(1)
All
amounts are reported on a tax equivalent basis computed using the statutory
federal income tax rate, exclusive of the alternative
minimum tax rate, of 35% and nondeductible interest expense.
(2)
Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans.
(3)
Interest income on loans includes amortized loan fees, net of costs, for
each
loan category and yield calculations are stated to include all.
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income increased $386,000 and $670,000 for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2005, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2004.
The three- and six-month increases are attributable to increased service
charges
on deposit accounts of $69,000 and $136,000, respectively, and increases
in
insurance agency commissions of $205,000 and $380,000, respectively. The
Company
recognized gains on sales of securities of $58,000 during the first six months
of 2005, compared to a gain of $14,000 for the same period in
2004.
-
12
-
Noninterest
Expense
Total
noninterest expense for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 was
$6,079,000, compared to $5,586,000 for the same period last year. For the
six
months ended June 30, 2005, total noninterest expense was $12,372,000, an
increase of $1,573,000 over the same period last year. Approximately $504,000
of
the six-month increase relates to the operation of Felton Bank, which was
acquired on April 1, 2004, and the remainder relates to increases in salaries
and benefits expense of $767,000, premises and equipment expense of $76,000
and
other operating expense $226,000 associated with a new branch opened in the
fourth quarter of 2004 and overall growth of the Company.
Income
Taxes
The
effective tax rate for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005
was
36.5% and 36.9%, respectively, compared to 35.8% and 36.3%, respectively,
for
the same periods last year. Management believes that there have been no changes
in tax law or to the Company’s tax structure that are likely to have a future
material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Loans
Loans,
net of unearned income, totaled $615,834,000 at June 30, 2005, an increase
of
$20,376,000 since December 31, 2004. Average loans, net of unearned income,
totaled $598,290,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, a $64,293,000
increase when compared to the same period last year.
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The
Company has established an allowance for credit losses, which is increased
by
provisions charged against earnings and recoveries of previously charged-off
debts. The allowance is decreased by current period charge-off of uncollectible
debts. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses
on a
quarterly basis and adjusts the provision for credit losses based upon this
analysis. The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses
is
based on a risk rating system of individual loans, as well as on a collective
evaluation of smaller balance homogenous loans based on factors such as past
credit loss experience, local economic trends, nonperforming and problem
loans,
and other factors which may impact collectibility. A loan is placed on
nonaccrual when it is specifically determined to be impaired and principal
and
interest is delinquent for 90 days or more. Please refer to the discussion
above
under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies” for an overview of the
underlying methodology that Management employs on a quarterly basis to maintain
the allowance.
The
provision for credit losses for the three- and six-month periods ended June
30,
2005 was $180,000 and $360,000, respectively, compared to $100,000 and $205,000,
respectively, for the same periods of 2004. The Company has experienced a
decline in nonaccrual and past due loans since December 31, 2004; however,
Management decided to not significantly decrease the specific allowance
associated with those loans because of its evaluation of each borrower’s ability
to repay and the value of the underlying loan collateral. The increased
provision is the result of increases in both the formula allowance and
nonspecific allowance components. Growth of the loan portfolio and Management’s
assessment of factors used in calculating the nonspecific allowance contributed
to the increased provision. The Company continues to maintain strong
underwriting guidelines, and Management believes that the local economy remains
stable and that collateral values have increased as a result of the strength
of
the local real estate economy. Each of these factors has had a positive effect
on the quality of the Company’s loan portfolio. The Company’s historical
charge-off ratios are much lower than those of similarly sized institutions
according to the most recent FDIC quarterly banking profile. Net charge-offs
were $78,000 and $192,000 for the three- and six-month periods ended June
30,
2005, respectively, compared to $135,000 and $360,000, respectively, for
the
same periods in 2004. Since December 31, 2004, nonaccrual loans have declined
by
$529,000 to $940,000. Loans past due 90 days and still accruing decreased
by
$2,174,000 since December 31, 2004, totaling $795,000 at June 30, 2005. The
decline in loans past due is primarily attributable to a real estate loan
which
was paid in full during the first quarter of 2005. The Company’s ratio of
nonperforming assets to total loans, including other real estate owned, remains
low. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of average loans was
.81%
at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Based on its quarterly evaluation
of the
adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, Management believes that the
allowance for credit losses and the related provision are adequate at June
30,
2005.
-
13
-
The
following table presents a summary of the activity in the allowance for
credit
losses:
Six
months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Allowance
balance - beginning of year
|
$
|
4,692
|
$
|
4,060
|
|||
Charge-offs:
|
|||||||
Commercial
and other
|
169
|
404
|
|||||
Real
estate
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Consumer
|
59
|
52
|
|||||
Totals
|
228
|
456
|
|||||
Recoveries:
|
|||||||
Commercial
|
12
|
37
|
|||||
Real
estate
|
1
|
19
|
|||||
Consumer
|
23
|
40
|
|||||
Totals
|
36
|
96
|
|||||
Net
charge-offs
|
192
|
360
|
|||||
Allowance
of acquired institution
|
—
|
426
|
|||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
360
|
205
|
|||||
Allowance
balance - end of period
|
$
|
4,860
|
$
|
4,331
|
|||
Average
loans outstanding during period
|
$
|
598,290
|
$
|
533,997
|
|||
Net
charge-offs (annualized) as a percentage of
|
|||||||
average
loans outstanding during period
|
.02
|
%
|
.13
|
%
|
|||
Allowance
for credit losses at period end as a
|
|||||||
percentage
of average loans
|
.81
|
%
|
.81
|
%
|
Because
the Company’s loans are predominately secured by real estate, weaknesses in the
local real estate markets relevant to the Company may have a material adverse
effect on collateral values. The Company has a concentration of construction
and
land development loans in its market areas. At June 30, 2005, the balance
of
such loans was $121,708,000 or 19.8% of total outstanding loans, compared
to
$97,021,000 or 16.3% at December 31, 2004. The Company does not engage
in
foreign lending activities.
Nonperforming
Assets
The
following table summarizes past due and nonperforming assets of the Company
(in
thousands):
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
Nonperforming
Assets:
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Nonaccrual
loans
|
$
|
940
|
$
|
1,469
|
|||
Other
real estate owned
|
391
|
391
|
|||||
|
1,331
|
1,860
|
|||||
Past
due loans still accruing
|
795
|
2,969
|
|||||
Total
nonperforming and past due loans
|
$
|
2,126
|
$
|
4,829
|
Investment
Securities
Investment
securities totaled $120,709,000 at June 30, 2005, an increase of $1,613,000
when
compared to December 31, 2004. The yields on bonds purchased during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2005 were higher that the yields on bonds
that
either matured or were called during this period. The average balance of
investment securities was $119,455,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2005,
compared to $151,556,000 for the same period in 2004. The tax equivalent
yields
on investment securities for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005
and 2004
were 3.77% and 3.63%, respectively.
Deposits
Total
deposits at June 30, 2005 were $683,414,000, compared to $658,672,000 at
December 31, 2004. Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more declined
$5,024,000 during the second quarter of 2005 after an increase of $7,495,000
during the first quarter of 2005. These fluctuations are primarily the
result of
deposit activities of a single municipal depositor. Since December 31,
2004,
money market and savings deposits have increased by $8,123,000 and other
certificates of deposit have increased by $14,267,000.
-
14
-
Borrowed
Funds
Short-term
borrowings at June 30, 2005 and 2004 consisted of securities sold under
agreements to repurchase. The Company also had a convertible advance from
the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta in the amount of $5,000,000 at June 30,
2005
and 2004. The advance is due in March 2006.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company derives liquidity through increased customer deposits, maturities
in the
investment portfolio, loan repayments and income from earning assets. To
the
extent that deposits are not adequate to fund customer loan demand, liquidity
needs can be met in the short-term funds markets through arrangements with
correspondent banks. Talbot Bank and Centreville National Bank are also
members
of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta to which they have pledged collateral
sufficient to permit additional borrowing of up to approximately $45 million
at
June 30, 2005. Management is not aware of any trends or demands, commitments,
events or uncertainties that are likely to materially affect the Company’s
future ability to maintain liquidity at satisfactory levels.
Total
stockholders’ equity was $97.9 million at June 30, 2005, which represents an
increase of 5.3% since December 31, 2004. Accumulated other comprehensive
loss,
which consists solely of net unrealized losses on investment securities
available for sale, increased by $228,000 during the first six months of
2005,
resulting in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $506,000 at June 30,
2005.
Bank
regulatory agencies have adopted various capital standards for financial
institutions, including risk-based capital standards. The primary objectives
of
the risk-based capital framework are to provide a more consistent system
for
comparing capital positions of financial institutions and to take into
account
the different risks among financial institutions’ assets and off-balance sheet
items.
Risk-based
capital standards have been supplemented with requirements for a minimum
Tier 1
capital to assets ratio (leverage ratio). In addition, regulatory agencies
consider the published capital levels as minimum levels and may require
a
financial institution to maintain capital at higher levels.
A
comparison of the Company’s capital ratios as of June 30, 2005 to the minimum
regulatory requirements is presented below:
Actual
|
Minimum
Requirements
|
||||||
Tier
1 risk-based capital
|
13.23
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
|||
Total
risk-based capital
|
14.01
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
|||
Leverage
ratio
|
10.72
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
The
Company’s principal market risk exposure is to fluctuating interest rates. The
Company utilizes a simulation model to quantify the effect that hypothetical
plus or minus 200 and 100 basis point changes in rates would have on net
interest income and the fair value of capital. The model takes into
consideration the effect of call features of investments as well as repayments
of loans in periods of declining rates. When actual changes in interest rates
occur, the changes in interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities
may differ from the assumptions used in the model. As of June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, the model produced the following sensitivity profile for
net
interest income and the fair value capital:
|
Immediate
Change in Rates
|
||||
|
+200
|
+100
|
-100
|
-200
|
Policy
|
|
Basis
Points
|
Basis
Points
|
Basis
Points
|
Basis
Points
|
Limit
|
June
30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
Change in Net Interest Income
|
9.25%
|
5.21%
|
(5.96)%
|
(12.90)%
|
± 25%
|
%
Change in Fair Value of Capital
|
3.42%
|
2.31%
|
(3.75)%
|
(9.32)%
|
±
15%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
Change in Net Interest Income
|
8.90%
|
5.19%
|
(6.41)%
|
(14.09)%
|
±
25%
|
%
Change in Fair Value of Capital
|
2.49%
|
1.90%
|
(4.08)%
|
(10.31)%
|
±
15%
|
-
15
-
The
Company’s objectives and strategies in managing market risk have not materially
changed since December 31, 2004 and are discussed in detail in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 under the
caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations—Market Risk Management”.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures.
The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the SEC, such as this Quarterly
Report,
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in those rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and
communicated to Management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and
the Principal Accounting Officer (“PAO”), as appropriate, to allow for timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. A control system, no matter how
well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of
a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints,
and
the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making
can
be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the
control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon
certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may
deteriorate.
An
evaluation of the effectiveness of these disclosure controls as of June 30,
2005
was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of Management,
including the CEO and the PAO. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s
management, including the CEO and the PAO, has concluded that the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
During
the second quarter of 2005, there was no change in the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders.
At
the
Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 27, 2005, the
stockholders elected one individual to serve as Director until the 2007 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, four individuals to serve as Director until the
2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and one individual to serve until the 2006
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Company submitted these matters to a
vote
through the solicitation of proxies. The results of the elections are as
follows:
Class
I Nominee (Term expires 2007)
|
For
|
Withheld
|
Abstain
|
Broker
Non-Votes
|
|||||||||
Thomas
H. Evans
|
4,206,463
|
9,436
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Class
II Nominees (Term expires 2008)
|
|||||||||||||
Herbert
L. Andrew, III
|
4,209,219
|
6,680
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Blenda
W. Armistead
|
4,204,279
|
11,620
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Mark
M. Freestate
|
4,207,341
|
8,558
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Neil
R. LeCompte
|
4,207,196
|
8,703
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Class
III Nominees ( Term expires 2006)
|
|||||||||||||
W.
Edwin Kee, Jr.
|
4,186,446
|
29,453
|
—
|
—
|
Item
5. Other Information.
On
June
1, 2005, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency authorized Centreville
National Bank’s to exercise trust powers.
-
16
-
Item
6. Exhibits.
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 14,
2000).
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
of the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 14,
2000).
|
10.1
|
Form
of Employment Agreement with W. Moorhead Vermilye (incorporated
by
reference to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed
on July 31, 2000).
|
10.2
|
Form
of Employment Agreement with Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated by
reference
to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on July
31, 2000).
|
10.3
|
Form
of Employment Agreement between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and
Kevin P.
LaTulip (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002).
|
10.4
|
Form
of Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreement between The
Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003).
|
10.5
|
Form
of Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement
between
The Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003).
|
10.6
|
Employment
Agreement between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and Steven Fulwood
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004).
|
10.7
|
Employment
Agreement between The Felton Bank and Thomas H. Evans (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004).
|
10.8
|
1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated
by reference to Appendix A of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed
on March
31, 2003).
|
10.9
|
1998
Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on
September 25, 1998 (Registration No.
333-64319)).
|
10.10
|
Talbot
Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May
4, 2001 (Registration No.
333-60214)).
|
10.11
|
Separation
Agreement and General Release between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC
and
Steven Fulwood (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11 of the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2005).
|
31.1
|
Certifications
of the CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed
herewith).
|
31.2
|
Certifications
of the PAO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed
herewith).
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (furnished
herewith).
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the PAO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (furnished
herewith).
|
-
17
-
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has
duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly
authorized.
Shore Bancshares, Inc. | ||
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ W. Moorhead Vermilye |
W. Moorhead Vermilye |
||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ Susan E. Leaverton |
Susan E. Leaverton, CPA |
||
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer |
-
18
-
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
Description |
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 14,
2000).
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 14,
2000).
|
10.1
|
Form
of Employment Agreement with W. Moorhead Vermilye (incorporated by
reference to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed
on July 31, 2000).
|
10.2
|
Form
of Employment Agreement with Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated by reference
to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on July
31, 2000).
|
10.3
|
Form
of Employment Agreement between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and Kevin
P.
LaTulip (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002).
|
10.4
|
Form
of Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreement between The
Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003).
|
10.5
|
Form
of Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement
between
The Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003).
|
10.6
|
Employment
Agreement between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and Steven Fulwood
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004).
|
10.7
|
Employment
Agreement between The Felton Bank and Thomas H. Evans (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004).
|
10.8
|
1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated
by reference to Appendix A of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed on
March
31, 2003).
|
10.9
|
1998
Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on
September 25, 1998 (Registration No.
333-64319)).
|
10.10
|
Talbot
Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May
4, 2001 (Registration No.
333-60214)).
|
10.11
|
Separation
Agreement and General Release between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC
and
Steven Fulwood (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11 of the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2005).
|
31.1
|
Certifications
of the CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed
herewith).
|
31.2
|
Certifications
of the PAO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed
herewith).
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (furnished
herewith).
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the PAO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (furnished
herewith).
|