SHORE BANCSHARES INC - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2007
OR
o |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
transition period from ________ to ________
Commission
file number 0-22345
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
|
52-1974638
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
|
18
East Dover Street, Easton, Maryland
|
21601
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(410)
822-1400
Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code
N/A
Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X|
No
|_|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer x Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).Yes o No x
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date: 8,379,707 shares of common stock
as of
August 1, 2007.
INDEX
Page
|
||||
Part
I.Financial Information
|
2
|
|||
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
2
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets -
|
||||
June
30, 2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006
|
2
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income -
|
||||
For
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
(unaudited)
|
3
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
-
|
||||
For
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)
|
4
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
|
||||
For
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)
|
5
|
|||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
6
|
|||
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
11
|
|||
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
16
|
|||
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
16
|
|||
Part
II. Other Information
|
17
|
|||
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
17
|
|||
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceed
|
17
|
|||
Item
4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
|
18
|
|||
Item
6. Exhibits
|
18
|
|||
Signatures
|
19
|
|||
Exhibit
Index
|
20
|
1
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements.
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
June
30,
|
|
December
31,
|
|||||
ASSETS:
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|||
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
16,743
|
$
|
26,511
|
|||
Interest
bearing deposits with other banks
|
15,553
|
33,540
|
|||||
Federal
funds sold
|
15,226
|
19,622
|
|||||
Investment
securities:
|
|||||||
Held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost (fair value of $13,750 and
|
|||||||
$13,938
, respectively)
|
13,952
|
13,971
|
|||||
Available
for sale, at fair value
|
112,353
|
116,275
|
|||||
Loans,
less allowance for credit losses ($6,885 and
|
|||||||
$6,300,
respectively)
|
724,326
|
693,419
|
|||||
Insurance
premiums receivable
|
487
|
574
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
15,965
|
15,973
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable on loans and investment securities
|
5,065
|
4,892
|
|||||
Investment
in unconsolidated subsidiary
|
937
|
937
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
11,939
|
11,939
|
|||||
Other
intangible assets
|
1,421
|
1,569
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,528
|
2,092
|
|||||
Other
real estate owned
|
313
|
398
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
3,955
|
3,937
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
940,763
|
$
|
945,649
|
|||
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Noninterest
bearing demand
|
$
|
110,305
|
$
|
109,962
|
|||
NOW
and Super NOW
|
106,983
|
112,549
|
|||||
Certificates
of deposit $100,000 or more
|
156,688
|
153,731
|
|||||
Other
time and savings
|
390,752
|
397,940
|
|||||
Total
Deposits
|
764,728
|
774,182
|
|||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
2,071
|
2,243
|
|||||
Short
term borrowings
|
27,560
|
28,525
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
84
|
-
|
|||||
Long
term debt
|
27,000
|
25,000
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
4,390
|
4,372
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
825,833
|
834,322
|
|||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized 35,000,000
shares;
|
|||||||
issued
and outstanding:
|
|||||||
June
30, 2007 8,379,307
|
|||||||
December
31, 2006 8,383,395
|
84
|
84
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
29,487
|
29,687
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
86,356
|
82,279
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(997
|
)
|
(723
|
)
|
|||
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
114,930
|
111,327
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
940,763
|
$
|
945,649
|
See
accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
2
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
months ended June 30,
|
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||||
INTEREST
INCOME
|
|||||||||||||
Loans,
including fees
|
$
|
14,210
|
$
|
12,481
|
$
|
27,834
|
$
|
23,936
|
|||||
Interest
and dividends on investment securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Taxable
|
1,291
|
1,045
|
2,575
|
2,065
|
|||||||||
Tax-exempt
|
135
|
135
|
259
|
278
|
|||||||||
Other
interest income
|
619
|
282
|
1,477
|
729
|
|||||||||
Total
interest income
|
16,255
|
13,943
|
32,145
|
27,008
|
|||||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit, $100,000 or more
|
1,923
|
1,215
|
3,849
|
2,295
|
|||||||||
Other
deposits
|
3,479
|
2,427
|
6,921
|
4,665
|
|||||||||
Interest
on short-term borrowings
|
248
|
238
|
494
|
502
|
|||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
363
|
154
|
734
|
223
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
6,013
|
4,034
|
11,998
|
7,685
|
|||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME
|
10,242
|
9,909
|
20,147
|
19,323
|
|||||||||
PROVISION
FOR CREDIT LOSSES
|
413
|
240
|
655
|
551
|
|||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR
|
|||||||||||||
CREDIT
LOSSES
|
9,829
|
9,669
|
19,492
|
18,772
|
|||||||||
NONINTEREST
INCOME
|
|||||||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
782
|
779
|
1,471
|
1,523
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of securities
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
|||||||||
Insurance
agency commissions
|
1,562
|
1,661
|
3,601
|
3,992
|
|||||||||
Other
noninterest income
|
917
|
879
|
1,836
|
1,510
|
|||||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
3,261
|
3,319
|
6,909
|
7,025
|
|||||||||
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
4,715
|
4,395
|
9,648
|
8,863
|
|||||||||
Expenses
of premises and equipment
|
822
|
708
|
1,654
|
1,440
|
|||||||||
Other
noninterest expense
|
2,210
|
1,944
|
4,336
|
3,835
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
7,747
|
7,047
|
15,638
|
14,138
|
|||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE TAXES ON INCOME
|
5,343
|
5,941
|
10,763
|
11,659
|
|||||||||
Federal
and state income tax expense
|
1,987
|
2,190
|
4,004
|
4,357
|
|||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$
|
3,356
|
$
|
3,751
|
$
|
6,759
|
$
|
7,302
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$
|
.40
|
$
|
.45
|
$
|
.81
|
$
|
.87
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$
|
.40
|
$
|
.45
|
$
|
.81
|
$
|
.87
|
|||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$
|
.16
|
$
|
.15
|
$
|
.32
|
$
|
.29
|
|||||
See
accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
3
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
For
the
Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Common
|
|
Paid
in
|
|
Retained
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
|||||
|
|
Stock
|
|
Capital
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Loss
|
|
Equity
|
||||||
Balances,
January 1, 2007
|
$
|
84
|
$
|
29,687
|
$
|
82,279
|
$
|
(723
|
)
|
$
|
111,327
|
|||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
6,759
|
-
|
6,759
|
|||||||||||
Other
comprehensive gain, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on available for sale
|
||||||||||||||||
securities,
net of reclassification
|
||||||||||||||||
adjustment
of $0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(274
|
)
|
(274
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
6,485
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
issued
|
-
|
37
|
-
|
-
|
37
|
|||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-
|
29
|
-
|
-
|
29
|
|||||||||||
Stock
repurchased and retired
|
-
|
(266
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(266
|
)
|
|||||||||
Cash
dividends declared $0.32 per share
|
-
|
-
|
(2,682
|
)
|
-
|
(2,682
|
)
|
|||||||||
Balances,
June 30, 2007
|
$
|
84
|
$
|
29,487
|
$
|
86,356
|
$
|
(997
|
)
|
$
|
114,930
|
|||||
Balances,
January 1, 2006
|
$
|
55
|
$
|
29,014
|
$
|
73,642
|
$
|
(1,263
|
)
|
$
|
101,448
|
|||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
7,302
|
-
|
7,302
|
|||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on available for sale
|
||||||||||||||||
securities,
net of reclassification
|
||||||||||||||||
adjustment
of $0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(553
|
)
|
(553
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
6,749
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
issued
|
1
|
413
|
-
|
-
|
414
|
|||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-
|
24
|
-
|
-
|
24
|
|||||||||||
Stock
dividend paid
|
28
|
(28
|
)
|
(9
|
)
|
-
|
(9
|
)
|
||||||||
Cash
dividends declared $0.29 per share
|
-
|
-
|
(2,395
|
)
|
-
|
(2,395
|
)
|
|||||||||
Balances,
June 30, 2006
|
$
|
84
|
29,423
|
$
|
78,540
|
$
|
(1,816
|
)
|
$
|
106,231
|
||||||
See
accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
4
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Dollars
in thousands)
For
the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
||||||
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
6,759
|
$
|
7,302
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
|
|||||||
operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
743
|
712
|
|||||
Stock
based compensation expense
|
29
|
24
|
|||||
Discount
accretion on debt securities
|
(62
|
)
|
(47
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for credit losses
|
655
|
551
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of premise and equipment
|
-
|
4
|
|||||
Net
changes in:
|
|||||||
Insurance
premiums receivable
|
86
|
586
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
(173
|
)
|
(373
|
)
|
|||
Other
assets
|
(271
|
)
|
(215
|
)
|
|||
Accrued
interest payable
|
(172
|
)
|
265
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
102
|
(282
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
7,696
|
8,527
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from maturities and principal payments of securities
|
|||||||
available
for sale
|
15,343
|
7,632
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of investment securities available for sale
|
-
|
52
|
|||||
Purchase
of securities available for sale
|
(11,824
|
)
|
(5,852
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from maturities and principal payments of securities
|
|||||||
held
to maturity
|
9
|
743
|
|||||
Purchase
of securities held to maturity
|
-
|
(203
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase in loans
|
(31,561
|
)
|
(48,533
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of premises and equipment
|
(569
|
)
|
(1,283
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of other real estate owned
|
85
|
255
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(28,517
|
)
|
(47,189
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
decrease in demand, NOW, money market and
|
|||||||
savings
deposits
|
(16,701
|
)
|
(24,743
|
)
|
|||
Net
increase in certificates of deposit
|
7,247
|
35,347
|
|||||
Net
decrease in short term borrowings
|
(965
|
)
|
(422
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
2,000
|
21,000
|
|||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
37
|
414
|
|||||
Stock
repurchased and retired
|
(266
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Dividends
paid
|
(2,682
|
)
|
(2,404
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(11,330
|
)
|
29,192
|
||||
NET
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(32,151
|
)
|
(9,470
|
)
|
|||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
79,673
|
67,459
|
|||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
47,522
|
$
|
57,989
|
|||
Supplemental
cash flows information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
12,170
|
$
|
11,405
|
|||
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
4,130
|
$
|
3,985
|
|||
Transfers
from loans to other real estate owned
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
255
|
|||
See
accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
5
Shore
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes
to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For
the
three and six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
(Unaudited)
Note
1
- Basis of Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Shore Bancshares,
Inc.
(the “Company”) and its subsidiaries with all significant intercompany
transactions eliminated. The
consolidated financial statements conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and to prevailing practices within
the
banking industry. The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited;
however, in the opinion of management all adjustments necessary to present
fairly the financial position at June 30, 2007, the results of operations for
the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and cash flows
for
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, have been included. All
such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The amounts as of December 31,
2006 were derived from audited financial statements. The results of operations
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for
the
full year. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction
with
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006.
Note
2
- Earnings Per Share
Basic
earnings per share is derived by dividing net income available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the
period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of outstanding options and warrants.
The following table provides information relating to the calculation of earnings
per share:
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
3,356
|
$
|
3,751
|
$
|
6,759
|
$
|
7,302
|
|||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding - Basic
|
8,378
|
8,367
|
8,380
|
8,356
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
securities
|
15
|
26
|
15
|
34
|
|||||||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding - Diluted
|
8,393
|
8,393
|
8,395
|
8,390
|
|||||||||
Earnings
per common share - Basic
|
$
|
0.40
|
$
|
0.45
|
$
|
0.81
|
$
|
0.87
|
|||||
Earnings
per common share - Diluted
|
$
|
0.40
|
$
|
0.45
|
$
|
0.81
|
$
|
0.87
|
There
were no antidilutive stock options excluded from the calculation of earnings
per
share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
Note
3
- Significant Accounting Policy
Under
the
provisions of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) Nos. 114
and
118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," a loan is considered
impaired if it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal
and
interest payments according to the loan’s contracted terms. The impairment of a
loan is measured at the present value of expected future cash flows using the
loan’s effective interest rate, or at the loan’s observable market price or the
fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Interest
income generally is not recognized on specific impaired loans unless the
likelihood of further loss is remote. Interest payments received on such loans
are applied as a reduction of the loans principal balance. Interest income
on
other nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent of interest payments
received.
6
Information
with respect to impaired loans and the related valuation allowance is shown
below:
June
30,
|
|
December
31,
|
|
||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||
Impaired
loans with valuation allowance
|
$
|
1,781
|
$
|
7,658
|
|||
Impaired
loans with no valuation allowance
|
144
|
-
|
|||||
Total
impaired loans
|
$
|
1,925
|
$
|
7,658
|
|||
Allowance
for credit losses applicable to impaired loans
|
$
|
869
|
$
|
883
|
|||
Allowance
for credit losses applicable to other than impaired loans
|
6,016
|
5,417
|
|||||
Total
allowance for credit losses
|
$
|
6,885
|
$
|
6,300
|
|||
Interest
income on impaired loans recorded on the cash basis
|
$
|
133
|
$
|
-
|
Interest
income on impaired loans recorded on the cash basis$
133$
-
Impaired
loans do not include groups of smaller balance homogenous loans such as
residential mortgage and consumer
installment
loans that are evaluated collectively for impairment. Reserves for probable
credit losses related to these loans are
based
upon historical loss ratios and are included in the allowance for credit
losses.
Note
4
- Commitments
In
the
normal course of business, to meet the financial needs of its customers, the
Company’s bank subsidiaries are parties to financial instruments with
off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments include commitments to
extend credit and standby letters of credit. At June 30, 2007, total commitments
to extend credit were approximately $243,745,000. Outstanding letters of credit
were approximately $26,002,000 at June 30, 2007.
Note
5
- Stock-Based Compensation
At
June
30, 2007, the Company had four equity compensation plans: (i) the Shore
Bancshares, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan; (ii) the Talbot Bancshares, Inc.
Employee Stock Option Plan; (iii) the Shore Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (“ESPP”); and (iv) the Shore Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Stock and
Incentive Compensation Plan. The plans are described in detail in Note 13 to
the
audited financial statements containd in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Stock-based awards granted to date
are generally time-based, vesting 20% on each anniversary of the grant date
over
five years and, in the case of stock options, expiring 10 years from the grant
date. ESPP awards allow employees to purchase shares of common stock at 85%
of
the fair market value on the date of grant. ESPP grants are 100% vested at
date
of grant and have a 27-month term.
The
Company had stock options and restricted stock outstanding at June 30, 2007
under three equity compensation plans, each of which has been approved by our
shareholders. During the second quarter of 2007 the Company granted 3,845 shares
of restricted common stock at a value of $25.31 per share. The outstanding
restricted stock awards vest in equal annual installments on the first through
the fifth anniversary dates of the grant subject to the employees’ continued
employment with the Company on the applicable anniversary date. Compensation
expense for restricted stock awards is measured on the grant date fair value
and
then recognized over the respective service period, which matches the vesting
period. None of the Company’s outstanding restricted stock awards were vested at
June 30, 2007.
The
following table summarizes restricted stock award activity for the Company
under
the 2006 Plan from January 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007:
|
|
Weighted
Average
grant
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
date
fair
value
per
|
|
||
|
|
Shares
|
|
common
share
|
|||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2007
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Granted
|
3,845
|
$
|
25.31
|
||||
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Cancelled
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2007
|
3,845
|
$
|
25.31
|
7
During
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 the Company recognized
pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $17,000 and $29,000, respectively,
compared to $12,000 and $24,000 for the comparable periods last year. Such
expense includes compensation expense for stock-based compensation awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, and all awards
granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value.
The
Company recognized compensation expense for stock option awards on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The total
of
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation
arrangements was $92,451 as of June 30, 2007. The cost will be recognized over
the remaining service period.
The
Company granted options pursuant to its ESPP on January 31, 2006. The fair
value
of these options was estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model using
the
following weighted average assumptions:
2006
|
||||
Dividend
yield
|
2.40
|
%
|
||
Expected
volatility
|
23.57
|
%
|
||
Risk
free interest
|
4.53
|
%
|
||
Expected
lives (in years)
|
2.25
|
|||
The
weighted average fair value of options granted was $5.91 per share in 2006.
No
options were granted during the three- or six-month periods ended June 30,
2007.
The
risk-free interest rate is based on the Federal Reserve Bank’s constant
maturities daily interest rate in effect at the time of the ESPP grant date.
For
valuation of the ESPP awards, the Company used the risk free interest rate
on
the date of grant. The expected life of the options represents the period of
time that the Company expects the awards will be outstanding based on historical
experience with similar awards. The computation of expected volatility for
the
ESPP awards is based on historical volatility of the underlying securities.
The
expected dividend yield is calculated by taking the total expected annual
dividend payout divided by the average stock price. Stock-based compensation
expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operation in the first
quarter of 2006 and 2007 reflects forfeitures as they occur.
The
following is a summary of changes in shares under option for all plans for
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|||||
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|||
|
|
of
Shares
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
Value
|
||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
37,515
|
$
|
15.82
|
|||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
Exercised
|
(2,525
|
)
|
17.92
|
|||||||
Expired/Cancelled
|
(77
|
)
|
18.47
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at end of period
|
34,913
|
15.73
|
$
|
353,769
|
||||||
Exercisable
at the end of period
|
34,913
|
$
|
16.19
|
$
|
359,769
|
The
following summarizes information about options outstanding at June 30,
2007:
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding and Exercisable
|
|
||||||
Options
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|||
Exercise
Price
|
|
Number
|
|
Number
|
|
Contract
Life
|
||||
$21.33
|
5,075
|
5,075
|
1.55
|
|||||||
14.00
|
4,005
|
4,005
|
2.55
|
|||||||
13.17
|
17,495
|
17,495
|
3.92
|
|||||||
18.47
|
8,338
|
8,338
|
0.83
|
|||||||
34,913
|
34,913
|
The
total
intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six -month
periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $24,000 and $537,000,
respectively. Cash received upon exercise of options during the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $37,000 and $222,000,
respectively.
8
Note
6
- Segment Reporting
The
Company operates two primary businesses: Community Banking and Insurance
Products and Services. Through the Community Banking business, the Company
provides services to consumers and small businesses on the Eastern Shore of
Maryland and Delaware through its 17-branch network. Community banking
activities include small business services, retail brokerage, and consumer
banking products and services. Loan products available to consumers include
mortgage, home equity, automobile, marine, and installment loans, credit cards
and other secured and unsecured personal lines of credit. Small business lending
includes commercial mortgages, real estate development loans, equipment and
operating loans, as well as secured and unsecured lines of credit, credit cards,
accounts receivable financing arrangements, and merchant card services.
Through
the Insurance Products and Services business, the Company provides a full range
of insurance products and services to businesses and consumers in the Company’s
market areas. Products include property and casualty, life, marine, individual
health and long-term care insurance. Pension and profit sharing plans and
retirement plans for executives and employees are available to suit the needs
of
individual businesses.
Selected
financial information by line of business for the six months ended June 30
is
included in the following table:
Community
|
|
|
Insurance
products
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|||
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
banking
|
|
|
and
services
|
|
|
Company(a)
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest income
|
$
|
20,119
|
$
|
23
|
$
|
5
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
20,147
|
||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
655
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
655
|
|||||||||||
Net
interest income after provision
|
19,464
|
23
|
5
|
-
|
19,492
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
3,309
|
3,718
|
2,568
|
(2,686
|
)
|
6,909
|
||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
12,585
|
3,080
|
2,659
|
(2,686
|
)
|
15,638
|
||||||||||
Income
before taxes
|
10,188
|
661
|
(86
|
)
|
-
|
10,763
|
||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
3,790
|
246
|
(32
|
)
|
-
|
4,004
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
6,398
|
$
|
415
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,759
|
|||||
Intersegment
revenue(expense)
|
$
|
(2,279
|
)
|
$
|
(183
|
)
|
$
|
2,462
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Average
assets
|
$
|
931,205
|
$
|
9,918
|
$
|
3,635
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
944,758
|
||||||
2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest income
|
$
|
19,321
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
19,323
|
||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
551
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
551
|
|||||||||||
Net
interest income after provision
|
18,770
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
18,772
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
2,993
|
4,104
|
2,102
|
(2,174
|
)
|
7,025
|
||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
11,096
|
3,062
|
2,154
|
(2,174
|
)
|
14,138
|
||||||||||
Income
before taxes
|
10,667
|
1,042
|
(50
|
)
|
-
|
11,659
|
||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
3,949
|
427
|
(19
|
)
|
-
|
4,357
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
6,718
|
$
|
615
|
$
|
31
|
$
|
-
|
$ | 7,302 | ||||||
Intersegment
revenue(expense)
|
$
|
(1,872
|
)
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
$
|
1,985
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Average
assets
|
$
|
843,765
|
$
|
10,240
|
$
|
3,709
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
857,714
|
(a)
Amount included in Parent Company relates to services provided to subsidiaries
by the Company and rental income.
Note
7
- New Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 155,
“Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — an amendment of
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statements No. 133 and 140.”
SFAS 155
amends SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” and SFAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” SFAS 155
(i) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument
that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation,
(ii) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not
subject to the requirements of SFAS 133, (iii) establishes a
requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify
interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial
instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation,
(iv) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of
subordination are not embedded derivatives, and (v) amends SFAS 140 to
eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special purpose entity from holding
a
derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other
than another derivative financial instrument. The adoption of SFAS 155 on
January 1, 2007 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
9
SFAS No. 156,
“Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 140.” SFAS 156
amends SFAS 140. “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 125,” by requiring, in certain situations, an entity to recognize a
servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation
to
service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract. All separately
recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities are required to be
initially measured at fair value. Subsequent measurement methods include the
amortization method, whereby servicing assets or servicing liabilities are
amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income
or net servicing loss or the fair value method, whereby servicing assets or
servicing liabilities are measured at fair value at each reporting date and
changes in fair value are reported in earnings in the period in which they
occur. If the amortization method is used, an entity must assess servicing
assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based
on
the fair value at each reporting date. The adoption of SFAS 156 on
January 1, 2007 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”
(“FIN
48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized
in a company’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement
of
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. FIN 48
also provides guidance on recognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The adoption of FIN
48
on January 1, 2007 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
SFAS No. 157,
“Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for the Company on
January 1, 2008 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
SFAS No. 158,
“Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88 106, and 132(R).”
SFAS 158
requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of
defined benefit post-retirement benefit plans as an asset or a liability in
its
statement of financial position. The funded status is measured as the difference
between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation (the projected
benefit obligation for pension plans or the accumulated benefit obligation
for
other post-retirement benefit plans). An employer is also required to measure
the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of
financial position with changes in the funded status recognized through
comprehensive income. SFAS 158 also requires certain disclosures regarding
the effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise
from delayed recognition of gains or losses, prior service costs or credits,
and
the transition asset or obligation. SFAS
No.
158’s requirement to recognize the funded status in the financial statements is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006, and its requirement
to use the fiscal year-end date as the measurement date is effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2008,
and is
not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
SFAS
No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115." SFAS
159
permits entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified
election dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting
date. The fair value option (i) may be applied instrument by instrument, with
certain exceptions, (ii) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs)
and
(iii) is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments.
SFAS 159 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008 and is not expected
to
have a significant impact on the Company's financial
statements.
10
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Unless
the context clearly suggests otherwise, references to “the Company”, “we”,
“our”, and “us” in this report are to Shore Bancshares, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking
Information
Portions
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of The Private Securities
Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical in nature, including
statements that include the words “anticipate”, “estimate”, “should”, “expect”,
“believe”, “intend”, and similar expressions, are expressions about our
confidence, policies, and strategies, the adequacy of capital levels, and
liquidity and are not guarantees of future performance. Such forward-looking
statements involve certain risks and uncertainties, including economic
conditions, competition in the geographic and business areas in which we
operate, inflation, fluctuations in interest rates, legislation, and
governmental regulation. These risks and uncertainties are described in detail
in the section of the periodic reports that Shore Bancshares, Inc. files with
the Securities and Exchange Commission entitled “Risk Factors” (see Item 1A of
Part II of this report). Actual results may differ materially from such
forward-looking statements, and we assume no obligation to update
forward-looking statements at any time except as required by law.
Introduction
The
following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of significant factors
affecting the financial condition and results of operations of Shore Bancshares,
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries for the periods indicated. This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes presented in
this
report, as well as the audited consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in the Annual Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-K
for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
Shore
Bancshares, Inc. is the largest independent financial holding company located
on
the Eastern Shore of Maryland. It is the parent company of The Talbot Bank
of
Easton, Maryland located in Easton, Maryland (“Talbot Bank”), The Centreville
National Bank of Maryland located in Centreville, Maryland (“Centreville
National Bank”) and The Felton Bank, located in Felton, Delaware (“Felton Bank”)
(collectively, the “Banks”). The Banks operate 17 full service branches in Kent,
Queen Anne’s, Talbot, Caroline and Dorchester Counties in Maryland and Kent
County, Delaware. The Company offers a full range of insurance products and
services to its customers through The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC, Elliott Wilson
Insurance, LLC, and Mubell Finance, LLC (collectively, the “Insurance Agency”)
and investment advisory services through Wye Financial Services, LLC, all of
which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Shore Bancshares, Inc. The shares of
common stock of Shore Bancshares, Inc. are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market
under the symbol “SHBI”.
The
Company maintains an Internet site at www.shbi.net
on which
it makes available free of charge its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to the
foregoing as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are
electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The financial
information contained within the financial statements is, to a significant
extent, financial information contained that is based on measures of the
financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A
variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either
when
earning of income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving
a
liability.
We
believe that our most critical accounting policy relates to the allowance for
credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is an estimate of the losses
that
may be sustained in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic
principles of accounting: (i) SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, which
requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and
estimable, and (ii) SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of
a
Loan, which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between
the
loan balance and the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows
or
values that are observable in the secondary market. Management uses many
factors, including economic conditions and trends, the value and adequacy of
collateral, the volume and mix of the loan portfolio, and our internal loan
processes in determining the inherent loss that may be present in our loan
portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from Management’s estimates.
In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to
another. Although the economics of transactions would be the same, the timing
of
events that would impact the transactions could change.
Management
has significant discretion in making the adjustments inherent in the
determination of the provision and allowance for credit losses, including in
connection with the valuation of collateral, the borrower’s prospects of
repayment, and in establishing allowance factors on the formula allowance and
unallocated allowance components of the allowance. The establishment of
allowance factors is a continuing exercise, based on Management’s continuing
assessment of the totality of all factors, including, but not limited to, as
delinquencies, loss history, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of
changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of Management, national
and
local economic trends, concentrations of credit, quality of loan review system
and the effect of external factors such as competition and regulatory
requirements, and their impact on the portfolio, and allowance factors may
change from period to period, resulting in an increase or decrease in the amount
of the provision or allowance, based upon the same volume and classification
of
loans. Changes in allowance factors will have a direct impact on the amount
of
the provision, and a corresponding effect on net income. Errors in Management’s
perception and assessment of these factors and their impact on the portfolio
could result in the allowance not being adequate to cover losses in the
portfolio, and may result in additional provisions or charge-offs.
11
Three
basic components comprise our allowance for credit losses: (i) a specific
allowance; (ii) a formula allowance; and (iii) a nonspecific allowance. Each
component is determined based on estimates that can and do change when the
actual events occur. The specific allowance is used to individually allocate
an
allowance to loans identified as impaired. An impaired loan may show
deficiencies in the borrower’s overall financial condition, payment history,
support available from financial guarantors and/or the fair market value of
collateral. When a loan is identified as impaired, a specific allowance is
established based on our assessment of the loss that may be associated with
the
individual loan. The formula allowance is used to estimate the loss on
internally risk rated loans, exclusive of those identified as impaired. Loans
identified as special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss, as well as
impaired, are segregated from performing loans. Remaining loans are then grouped
by type (commercial, commercial real estate, construction, home equity or
consumer). Each loan type is assigned an allowance factor based on Management’s
estimate of the risk, complexity and size of individual loans within a
particular category. Classified loans are assigned higher allowance factors
than
non-rated loans due to Management’s concerns regarding collectibility or
Management’s knowledge of particular elements regarding the borrower. Allowance
factors grow with the worsening of the internal risk rating. The nonspecific
formula is used to estimate the loss of non-classified loans stemming from
more
global factors such as delinquencies, loss history, trends in volume and terms
of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of
Management, national and local economic trends, concentrations of credit,
quality of loan review system and the effect of external factors such as
competition and regulatory requirements. The nonspecific allowance captures
losses whose impact on the portfolio have occurred but have yet to be recognized
in either the formula or specific allowance.
OVERVIEW
Net
income for the second quarter of 2007 was $3,356,000, or diluted earnings per
share of $.40, compared to $3,751,000, or diluted earnings per share of $.45,
for the second quarter of 2006. Annualized return on average assets was 1.43%
for the second quarter of 2007, compared to 1.75% for the same period in 2006.
Annualized return on average stockholders’ equity was 11.69% for the second
quarter of 2007 compared to 14.57% for the same period in 2006.
Net
income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $6,759,000, or diluted
earnings per share of $.81, compared to $7,302,000, or diluted earnings per
share of $.87, for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Annualized return on
average assets was 1.43% for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to
1.70% for the same period in 2006. Annualized return on average stockholder’s
equity was 11.89% for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 13.93%
for
the same period in 2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Net
Interest Income
Net
interest income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 was
$10,242,000 and $20,147,000, respectively, an increase of $333,000 or 3.4%
and
$824,000 or 4.3%, respectively, when compared to the same periods last year.
These increases are attributable to increases in earning assets, mostly loans,
and increased yields on earning assets. Total interest income increased by
$2,312,000 and $5,137,000 for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2007, respectively, when compared to the same periods last year.
The
Company’s net interest margin was 4.66% for
the
second quarter
of
2007,
compared to 5.00% for
the
second quarter of 2006. The market for deposits remained competitive throughout
the second
quarter
of
2007,
resulting in higher rates paid for interest-bearing deposits. The cost of funds
increased 79 basis points from 2.15% to 2.94% for the quarter ended June 30,
2007 when compared to the same quarter in 2006. The competitive environment
for
deposits was the primary cause of the increase in the cost of funds.
Total
interest expense increased $1,979,000 and $4,313,000 for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 when compared to the same periods last
year. The average balance of interest bearing deposits increased by $68,618,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 when compared to the same period in
2006.
The overall rate paid for interest bearing deposits increased 90 basis points
to
3.24% as a result of higher rates paid for all deposits. For the six months
ended June 30, 2007, the average balance of certificates of deposits, including
those $100,000 or more, increased by $56,313,000 when compared to the same
period last year, and the average rate paid for those certificates of deposit
increased 50 basis points to 4.51%. Other certificates of deposit increased
$22,154,000 when compared to the same period last year, and the average rate
paid for those deposits increased 111 basis points to 4.77%. Comparing the
first
six months of 2007 to the same period in 2006, interest bearing demand deposits
increased by approximately $4,272,000 and money management and savings deposits
declined by $14,122,000.
12
Loans
comprised 79.2% and 80.8% of total average earning assets at June 30, 2007
and
2006, respectively.
Analysis
of Interest Rates and Interest Differentials.
The
following table presents the distribution of the average consolidated balance
sheets, interest income/expense, and annualized yields earned and rates paid
through June 30, 2007 and 2006:
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Average
|
|
Income
|
|
Yield
|
|
Average
|
|
Income
|
|
Yield
|
|
||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
Expense
|
|
Rate
|
|
Balance
|
|
Expense
|
|
Rate
|
|||||||
Earning
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
$
|
129,422
|
$
|
2,974
|
4.60
|
%
|
$
|
121,534
|
$
|
2,488
|
4.09
|
%
|
|||||||
Loans
|
705,465
|
27,873
|
7.90
|
%
|
643,335
|
23,962
|
7.45
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
25,630
|
667
|
5.20
|
%
|
10,748
|
242
|
4.50
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
30,743
|
810
|
5.27
|
%
|
20,759
|
487
|
4.69
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
earning assets
|
891,260
|
32,324
|
7.25
|
%
|
796,380
|
27,179
|
6.83
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
earning assets
|
53,498
|
61,334
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
944,758
|
$
|
857,714
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
$
|
664,208
|
10,770
|
3.24
|
%
|
$
|
595,590
|
6,960
|
2.34
|
%
|
|||||||||
Short
term borrowing
|
26,832
|
494
|
3.69
|
%
|
30,417
|
502
|
3.30
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Long
term debt
|
27,000
|
734
|
5.43
|
%
|
10,684
|
223
|
4.18
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
718,040
|
11,998
|
3.34
|
%
|
636,691
|
7,685
|
2.41
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing liabilities
|
112,998
|
116,202
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
113,720
|
104,821
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
944,758
|
$
|
857,714
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
$
|
20,326
|
3.91
|
%
|
$
|
19,494
|
4.42
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
4.56
|
%
|
4.90
|
%
|
(1) All amounts are reported on a tax equivalent basis computed using the statutory federal income tax rate exclusive of the
alternative
minimum tax rate of 35% and nondeductible interest expense.
(2)
Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans.
(3)
Interest income on loans includes amortized loan fees, net of costs, for each
loan category and yield calculations are stated to include all.
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 totaled
$3.3
million and $6.9 million,
respectively, when
compared
to $3.3 million and $7.0 million for the same periods in 2006. The declines
are
primarily attributable to a decrease in insurance agency commissions relating
to
contingency income received, which varies from year to year depending on a
number of factors outside of the control of the Company. The Company received
an
unusually large amount of contingency income in 2006. During the first half
of
2007, service charge income declined $52,000, insurance agency commissions,
which includes contingency income, declined $391,000 and other noninterest
income increased $326,000 when compared to the same six-month period in 2006.
The increase in other noninterest income is primarily attributable to trust
and
investment management fee increases of approximately $144,000
due to
growth in assets under management and increased commission income from mortgages
originated for sale on the secondary market of $309,000.
13
Noninterest
Expense
Noninterest
expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 increased $700,000
or
9.9% and $1.5 million or 10.6%, respectively, when compared to the same periods
in 2006. The increases are primarily attributable to the increased cost of
operating two additional bank branches, increased commission expense related
to
the increased income from the trust and advisory services and secondary market
mortgage programs, as well as additional
cost associated with segregating the CEO positions at Shore Bancshares and
The
Talbot Bank of Easton, Maryland, and hiring a new
CEO
for Talbot Bank in the third quarter of 2006. The Company also incurred
additional operating expense in conjunction with the search to fill the CEO
position at Centreville National Bank, following the retirement of the previous
CEO on December 31, 2006.
Income
Taxes
The
effective tax rate was 37.2% for each of the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2007 compared to 36.9% and 37.4%, respectively, for the same periods
last year. Management believes that there have been no changes in tax laws
or to
our tax structure that are likely to have a future material impact on our
effective tax rate.
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Loans
Loans,
net of unearned income, totaled $731,211,000 at June 30, 2007, an increase
of
$31,492,000 since December 31, 2006. Substantially all of the loan growth
occurred during the second quarter of 2007. Average loans, net of unearned
income, increased by $62,130,000 or 9.7% for the six months ended June 30,
2007
when compared to the same period last of year.
Allowance
for Credit Losses
We
have
established an allowance for credit losses, which is increased by provisions
charged against earnings and recoveries of previously charged-off debts. The
allowance is decreased by current period charge-off of uncollectible debts.
Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses on a
quarterly basis and adjusts the provision for credit losses based upon this
analysis. The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses
is
based on a risk rating system of individual loans, as well as on a collective
evaluation of smaller balance homogenous loans based on factors such as past
credit loss experience, local economic trends, nonperforming and problem loans,
and other factors which may impact collectibility. A loan is placed on
nonaccrual when it is specifically determined to be impaired and principal
and
interest is delinquent for 90 days or more. Please refer to the discussion
above
under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies” for an overview of the
underlying methodology Management employs on a quarterly basis to maintain
the
allowance.
The
provision for credit losses for the three- and six-month periods ended June
30,
2007 was $413,000 and $655,000, respectively, compared to $240,000 and $551,000,
respectively for the same periods in 2006. The increase in the provision during
the second quarter of 2007 when compared to the same period last year is
attributable to the growth in the loan portfolio and the identification of
losses in loans put on nonaccrual status during the second quarter. The overall
credit quality of the portfolio remains strong as evidenced by loan delinquency
and charge-off data at June 30, 2007. Management believes that we continue
to
maintain strong underwriting guidelines. Management also believes that the
local
economy remains stable, despite a slowing in the real estate market and that
collateral values remain stable. Our historical charge-off ratios remain lower
than those of similarly sized institutions according to the most recent Bank
Holding Company Performance Report prepared by the Federal Reserve Board. Net
charge-offs were $70,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, compared
to $225,000 for the same period last year. The allowance for credit losses
as a
percentage of average loans was .98% at June 30, 2007, compared to .86% at
June
30, 2006. Loans past due 90 days and still accruing at June 30, 2007 increased
slightly during the quarter, totaling $787,000, compared to $641,000 at December
31, 2006. Nonaccrual loans continued to decline during the second quarter,
totaling $1,944,000, compared to $3,974,000 at March 31, 2007 and $7,658,000
at
December 31, 2006. One loan totaling $4,500,000, which was on nonaccrual at
December 31, 2006, was paid in full during the first quarter of 2007. Another
loan relationship with loans totaling approximately $812,000 was paid in full
during the second quarter of 2007 and other loans totaling approximately
$1,173,000 were either paid in full or restored to accrual status due to
significant improvements made by the borrower in reducing its outstanding debts
with the Company as well as improvements made in its operations. Based on
Management’s quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit
losses, it believes that the allowance for credit losses and the related
provision are adequate at June 30, 2007.
14
The
following table presents a summary of the activity in the allowance for credit
losses:
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Allowance
balance - beginning of period
|
$
|
6,300
|
$
|
5,236
|
|||
Charge-offs:
|
|||||||
Commercial
and other
|
35
|
162
|
|||||
Real
estate
|
-
|
1
|
|||||
Consumer
|
122
|
144
|
|||||
Totals
|
157
|
307
|
|||||
Recoveries:
|
|||||||
Commercial
|
42
|
34
|
|||||
Real
estate
|
-
|
1
|
|||||
Consumer
|
45
|
47
|
|||||
Totals
|
87
|
82
|
|||||
Net
charge-offs
|
70
|
225
|
|||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
655
|
551
|
|||||
Allowance
balance-end of period
|
$
|
6,885
|
$
|
5,562
|
|||
Average
loans outstanding during period
|
$
|
705,465
|
$
|
643,335
|
|||
Net
charge-offs (annualized) as a percentage of
|
|||||||
average
loans outstanding during period
|
.02
|
%
|
.07
|
%
|
|||
Allowance
for credit losses at period end as a
|
|||||||
percentage
of average loans
|
.98
|
%
|
.86
|
%
|
Because
most of our loans are secured by real estate, weaknesses in the local real
estate market may have a material adverse effect on collateral values and the
performance of our loan portfolio. We have a concentration of commercial real
estate loans. Commercial real estate loans, excluding construction and land
development loans, at June 30, 2007 were approximately $207,851,000 or 28.4%
of
total loans, compared to $223,743,000 or 32.0% of total loans at December 31,
2006. Construction and land development loans at June 30, 2007 were $149,202,000
or 20.4% of total outstanding loans, compared to $153,715,000 or 22.2% of total
loans at December 31, 2006. We do not engage in foreign lending activities
or
subprime lending.
Nonperforming
Assets
The
following table summarizes our past due and nonperforming assets (in
thousands):
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
Nonperforming
Assets:
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Nonaccrual
loans
|
$
|
1,944
|
$
|
7,658
|
|||
Other
real estate owned
|
313
|
398
|
|||||
|
2,257
|
8,056
|
|||||
Past
due loans still accruing
|
787
|
641
|
|||||
Total
nonperforming and past due loans
|
$
|
3,044
|
$
|
8,697
|
Investment
Securities
Investment
securities totaled $126,305,000 at June 30, 2007, compared to $130,246,000
at
December 31, 2006. Reinvestment rates on bonds purchased during the first six
months of 2007 were much higher that the yields on bonds that matured during
this period. The average balance of investment securities was $129,422,000
for
the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $121,534,000 for the same period
in 2006. The tax equivalent yields on investment securities were 4.60% and
4.09%
for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Deposits
Total
deposits at June 30, 2007 were $764,728,000, compared to $774,182,000 at
December 31, 2006. Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more increased by
$2,957,000 during the first six months of 2007, NOW and SuperNOW declined
$5,566,000 and noninterest bearing demand remained relatively stable, increasing
only $343,000 since December 31, 2006. Other time and savings deposits have
declined by $7,188,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Borrowed
Funds
Short-term
borrowings at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $27,560,000 and
$28,525,000, respectively. Short-term borrowings consisted of securities sold
under agreements to repurchase and short-term borrowings from a correspondent
bank or the Federal Home Loan Bank.
15
Long
Term Debt
At
June
30, 2007, we had advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $27,000,000.
Maturities of outstanding advances are as follows:
July
2007
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
||
September
2007
|
2,000,000
|
|||
October
2007
|
4,000,000
|
|||
November
2007
|
6,000,000
|
|||
February
2008
|
5,000,000
|
|||
7,000,000
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
derive
liquidity through increased customer deposits, maturities in the investment
portfolio, loan repayments and income from earning assets. To the extent that
deposits are not adequate to fund customer loan demand, liquidity needs can
be
met in the short-term funds markets through arrangements with correspondent
banks. Talbot Bank and Centreville National Bank are also members of the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and Felton Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Pittsburgh to which they have pledged collateral sufficient to permit
additional borrowings of up to approximately $132 million at June 30, 2007.
Management is not aware of any trends or demands, commitments, events or
uncertainties that are likely to materially affect our future ability to
maintain liquidity at satisfactory levels.
Total
stockholders’ equity was $114.9 million at June 30, 2007, an increase of 3.2%
since December 31, 2006. Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which consists
solely of net unrealized losses on investment securities available for sale,
increased by $274,000 during the first six months of 2007, resulting in
accumulated other comprehensive loss of $997,000 at June 30, 2007.
Bank
regulatory agencies have adopted various capital standards for financial
institutions, including risk-based capital standards. The primary objectives
of
the risk-based capital framework are to provide a more consistent system for
comparing capital positions of financial institutions and to take into account
the different risks among financial institutions’ assets and off-balance sheet
items.
Risk-based
capital standards have been supplemented with requirements for a minimum Tier
1
capital to assets ratio (leverage ratio). In addition, regulatory agencies
consider the published capital levels as minimum levels and may require a
financial institution to maintain capital at higher levels.
A
comparison of our capital ratios as of June 30, 2007 to the minimum regulatory
requirements is presented below:
Minimum
|
|||||||
Actual
|
Requirements
|
||||||
Tier
1 risk-based capital
|
13.37
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
|||
14.32
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
||||
Leverage
ratio
|
11.08
|
%
|
3.00
|
%
|
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk.
Our
primary market risk is to interest rate fluctuation and Management has
procedures in place to evaluate and mitigate this risk. This risk and these
procedures are discussed in Item 7 of Part II of the Annual Report of Shore
Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 under the
caption “Market Risk Management”. Management believes that there have been no
material changes in our market risks, the procedures used to evaluate and
mitigate these risks, or our actual and simulated sensitivity positions since
December 31, 2006.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures.
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 with the SEC, such as this Quarterly Report, is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in those
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to
Management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Principal
Accounting Officer (“PAO”), as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. A control system, no matter how well conceived
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the
control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may
deteriorate.
16
An
evaluation of the effectiveness of these disclosure controls as of June 30,
2007
was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of Management,
including the CEO and the PAO. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s
management, including the CEO and the PAO, has concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at the reasonable assurance
level.
During
the second quarter of 2007, there was no change in our internal control over
financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
The
risks
and uncertainties to which our financial condition and operations are subject
are discussed in detail in Item 1A of Part I of the Annual Report of Shore
Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management
does not believe that any material changes in our risk factors have occurred
since they were last disclosed.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The
following table provides information about shares of common stock purchased
by
or on behalf of the Company and its affiliates (as defined by Exchange Act
Rule
10b-18) during the three-month period ended June 30 2007:
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
|
Total
Number of
Shares (or Units) Purchased (1) |
Average
Price Paid
per Share (or Unit) |
Total
Number of
Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum
Number
(or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
|||||||||
April
2007
|
|||||||||||||
May
2007
|
|
|
234
|
|
$
|
25.95
|
234
|
418,466
|
|||||
June
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
234
|
$
|
25.95
|
234
|
418,466
|
Note:
(1) |
All
shares were purchased under the Company’s repurchase
plan that was adopted on February 2, 2006 and amended on May 1, 2007.
The
adoption of this plan and its amendment were publicly announced on
February 8, 2006 and May 3, 2007, respectively. The plan originally
authorized the Company to purchase up to 165,000 shares of its common
stock over a 60-month period in open market and/or private transactions.
As amended, the plan now authorizes the Company to repurchase up
to 5% of
the issued and outstanding shares of Company common stock (or 418,700
as
of April 30, 2007) over the same 60-month period. The plan provides
that
the price at which the shares are purchased may not be less than
the
fair market value of a share of common stock as listed or quoted
on the
Nasdaq Stock Market on the date of purchase.
|
17
Item
4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders.
At
the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 25, 2007, the stockholders of
Shore
Bancshares, Inc. elected four individuals to serve as Class I Directors until
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly
elected and qualify. The Board of Directors submitted this matter to a vote
through the solicitation of proxies. The results of the vote were as
follows:
For
|
Withheld
|
Abstain
|
Broker
Non-Votes
|
||||||||||
Election
of Directors:
|
|||||||||||||
William
W. Duncan
|
6,444,338
|
58,027
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Thomas
H. Evans
|
6,431,293
|
71,072
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
6,443,523
|
58,842
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Christopher
F. Spurry
|
6,443,523
|
58,842
|
-
|
-
|
Item
6. Exhibits.
The
exhibits filed or furnished with this quarterly report are shown on the Exhibit
List that follows the signatures to this report, which list is incorporated
herein by reference.
18
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
SHORE
BANCSHARES, INC.
|
||
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2007 | By: | /s/ W. Moorhead Vermilye |
W. Moorhead Vermilye |
||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: August 9, 2007 | By: | /s/ Susan E. Leaverton |
Susan E. Leaverton, CPA |
||
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer |
19
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
||
Exhibit Number |
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 14,
2000).
|
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2005).
|
|
10.1
|
Form
of Employment Agreement with W. Moorhead Vermilye (incorporated by
reference to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed
on July 31, 2000).
|
|
10.2
|
Employment
Termination Agreement among Centreville National Bank, the Company,
and
Daniel T. Cannon dated December 7, 2006 (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 12,
2006).
|
|
10.3
|
Employment
Agreement with Thomas H. Evans, as amended on November 3, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed
on November 9, 2005).
|
|
10.4
|
Summary
of Compensation Arrangement for Lloyd L. Beatty, Jr. (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2006).
|
|
10.5
|
Amended
Summary of Compensation Arrangement for William W. Duncan, Jr.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed
on February 14, 2007, as amended by Form 8-K/A filed on May 3,
2007).
|
|
10.6
|
Employment
Agreement between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and Mark M. Freestate
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
|
|
10.7
|
Shore
Bancshares, Inc. 2007 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 3,
2007).
|
|
10.8
|
Shore
Bancshares, Inc. Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed
on February 14, 2007)
|
|
10.9
|
Deferral
Election, Investment Designation, and Beneficiary Designation Forms
under
the Shore Bancshares, Inc. Amended and Restated Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006).
|
|
10.10
|
Form
of Centreville National Bank of Maryland Director Indexed Fee Continuation
Plan Agreement with Messrs. Cannon, Freestate and Pierson (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on
December 12, 2006).
|
|
10.11
|
Form
of Centreville National Bank Life Insurance Endorsement Split Dollar
Plan
Agreement with Messrs. Cannon, Freestate and Pierson (incorporated
herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December
12, 2006).
|
|
10.12
|
Form
of Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreement between The
Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003).
|
|
10.13
|
Form
of Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement
between
The Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003).
|
|
10.14
|
Talbot
Bank of Easton, Maryland Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2005).
|
20
10.15
|
Talbot
Bank of Easton, Maryland Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan
Trust
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2005).
|
||
10.16
|
1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference
to
Appendix A of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for
the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed on March 31,
2003).
|
||
10.17
|
1998
Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on
September 25, 1998 (Registration No. 333-64319)).
|
||
10.18
|
Talbot
Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May
4, 2001 (Registration No. 333-60214)).
|
||
10.19
|
Shore
Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated
by reference to Appendix A of the Company’s 2006 definitive proxy
statement filed on March 24, 2006).
|
||
10.20
|
Form
of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2006 Stock and Incentive
Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 11, 2007).
|
||
10.21
|
Changes
to Director Compensation Arrangements (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 6,
2006).
|
||
31.1
|
Certifications
of the CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed
herewith).
|
||
31.2
|
Certifications
of the PAO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed
herewith).
|
||
32.1
|
Certification
of the CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (furnished
herewith).
|
||
32.2
|
Certification
of the PAO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (furnished
herewith).
|
||
99.1
|
Shore
Bancshares, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference
to
the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3D (File No.
333-143002).
|
21