Annual Statements Open main menu

SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2021 June (Form 10-Q)



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2021
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____ to _____

 Commission File Number 000-06253
sfnc-20210630_g1.jpg SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Arkansas71-0407808
(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)Identification No.)
  
501 Main Street71601
Pine Bluff(Zip Code)
Arkansas
(Address of principal executive offices)
 (870) 541-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01 per shareSFNCThe Nasdaq Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes    No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes    No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
 
Accelerated filerNon-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting companyEmerging Growth company
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.).  Yes    No

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of August 3, 2021, was 108,284,170.




Simmons First National Corporation
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
June 30, 2021

Table of Contents

  Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities*
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures*
Item 5.Other Information*
   
 
___________________
*    No reportable information under this item.





Part I:    Financial Information
Item 1.    Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Simmons First National Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020
June 30,December 31,
(In thousands, except share data)20212020
 (Unaudited) 
ASSETS  
Cash and non-interest bearing balances due from banks$215,381 $217,499 
Interest bearing balances due from banks and federal funds sold2,123,743 3,254,653 
Cash and cash equivalents2,339,124 3,472,152 
Interest bearing balances due from banks - time1,335 1,579 
Investment securities:
Held-to-maturity, net of allowance for credit losses of $1,132 and $2,915 at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively
931,352 333,031 
Available-for-sale, net of allowance for credit losses of $0 and $312 at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively (amortized cost of $6,543,022 and $3,397,043 at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively)
6,556,581 3,473,598 
Total investments7,487,933 3,806,629 
Mortgage loans held for sale36,011 137,378 
Loans11,386,352 12,900,897 
Allowance for credit losses on loans(227,239)(238,050)
Net loans11,159,113 12,662,847 
Premises and equipment429,587 441,692 
Premises held for sale6,090 15,008 
Foreclosed assets and other real estate owned15,239 18,393 
Interest receivable67,916 72,597 
Bank owned life insurance419,198 255,630 
Goodwill1,075,305 1,075,305 
Other intangible assets103,759 111,110 
Other assets282,549 289,432 
Total assets$23,423,159 $22,359,752 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing transaction accounts$4,893,959 $4,482,091 
Interest bearing transaction accounts and savings deposits10,569,602 9,672,608 
Time deposits2,841,052 2,832,327 
Total deposits18,304,613 16,987,026 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase187,215 299,111 
Other borrowings1,339,193 1,342,067 
Subordinated notes and debentures383,143 382,874 
Other liabilities held for sale— 154,620 
Accrued interest and other liabilities169,629 217,398 
Total liabilities20,383,793 19,383,096 
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 40,040,000 shares authorized; Series D, $0.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation value per share; 767 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020
767 767 
Common stock, Class A, $0.01 par value; 175,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020; 108,386,669 and 108,077,662 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively
1,084 1,081 
Surplus2,021,128 2,014,076 
Undivided profits1,004,314 901,006 
Accumulated other comprehensive income12,073 59,726 
Total stockholders’ equity3,039,366 2,976,656 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$23,423,159 $22,359,752 

See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3




Simmons First National Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020

 Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)2021202020212020
 (Unaudited)(Unaudited)
INTEREST INCOME
Loans, including fees$138,804 $176,910 $285,228 $364,476 
Interest bearing balances due from banks and federal funds sold651 603 1,449 3,044 
Investment securities27,128 13,473 48,701 32,416 
Mortgage loans held for sale386 668 1,025 949 
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME166,969 191,654 336,403 400,885 
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits10,782 18,006 23,961 49,283 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase192 337 437 1,096 
Other borrowings4,897 4,963 9,699 9,840 
Subordinated notes and debentures4,565 4,667 9,092 9,502 
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE20,436 27,973 43,189 69,721 
NET INTEREST INCOME146,533 163,681 293,214 331,164 
Provision for credit losses(12,951)21,915 (11,506)45,049 
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES159,484 141,766 304,720 286,115 
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Trust income7,238 7,253 13,904 14,404 
Service charges on deposit accounts10,050 8,570 19,765 21,898 
Other service charges and fees2,048 1,489 3,970 3,077 
Mortgage lending income4,490 12,459 10,937 17,505 
SBA lending income287 245 527 541 
Investment banking income654 571 1,349 1,448 
Debit and credit card fees7,882 6,575 15,283 13,140 
Bank owned life insurance income2,038 1,445 3,561 2,743 
Gain on sale of securities, net5,127 390 10,598 32,485 
Other income8,110 9,809 18,370 22,610 
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME47,924 48,806 98,264 129,851 
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and employee benefits60,261 57,644 120,601 125,568 
Occupancy expense, net9,103 9,217 18,403 18,727 
Furniture and equipment expense4,859 6,144 10,274 11,867 
Other real estate and foreclosure expense863 274 1,206 599 
Deposit insurance1,687 2,838 2,995 5,313 
Merger related costs686 1,830 919 2,898 
Other operating expenses38,007 38,230 74,861 78,669 
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE115,466 116,177 229,259 243,641 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES91,942 74,395 173,725 172,325 
Provision for income taxes17,018 15,593 31,381 36,287 
NET INCOME74,924 58,802 142,344 136,038 
Preferred stock dividends13 13 26 26 
NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$74,911 $58,789 $142,318 $136,012 
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE$0.69 $0.54 $1.31 $1.23 
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE$0.69 $0.54 $1.31 $1.22 
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4




Simmons First National Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2021202020212020
 (Unaudited)(Unaudited)
NET INCOME$74,924 $58,802 $142,344 $136,038 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on available-for-sale securities71,801 22,159 (53,916)77,728 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net income5,127 390 10,598 32,485 
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax effect66,674 21,769 (64,514)45,243 
Less: Tax effect of other comprehensive income (loss)17,425 5,689 (16,861)11,824 
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)49,249 16,080 (47,653)33,419 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME$124,173 $74,882 $94,691 $169,457 

See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5



Simmons First National Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020
(In thousands)June 30, 2021June 30, 2020
 (Unaudited)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net income$142,344 $136,038 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization23,837 24,148 
Provision for credit losses(11,506)45,049 
Gain on sale of investments(10,598)(32,485)
Net accretion of investment securities and assets(24,377)(30,078)
Net amortization on borrowings269 271 
Stock-based compensation expense7,592 7,577 
Gain on sale of premises held for sale(606)— 
Gain on sale of foreclosed assets held for sale(177)(400)
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale(20,006)(14,993)
Gain on sale of other intangibles— (301)
Gain on sale of banking operations(5,300)(8,094)
Fair value write-down of closed branches— 1,465 
Deferred income taxes6,315 4,616 
Income from bank owned life insurance(3,630)(3,245)
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale(534,124)(470,797)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale655,497 423,858 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Interest receivable4,680 (18,021)
Other assets(2,402)(19,676)
Accrued interest and other liabilities(58,284)76,265 
Income taxes payable6,786 (34,233)
Net cash provided by operating activities176,310 86,964 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net change in loans1,520,504 (318,795)
Proceeds from sale of loans1,847 4,600 
Net change in due from banks - time244 (7)
Purchases of premises and equipment, net(5,829)(19,784)
Proceeds from sale of premises held for sale5,156 — 
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets held for sale10,988 6,173 
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities249,454 1,201,778 
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities314,547 2,048,453 
Purchases of available-for-sale securities(3,672,029)(2,386,878)
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity securities9,479 5,932 
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities(606,187)(16,997)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance(160,000)— 
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance death benefits3,032 763 
Disposition of assets and liabilities held for sale(134,166)181,261 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(2,462,960)706,499 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in deposits1,307,965 561,185 
Repayments of subordinated debentures— (5,927)
Dividends paid on preferred stock(26)(26)
Dividends paid on common stock(39,010)(37,606)
Net change in other borrowed funds(2,874)96,090 
Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase(111,896)236,880 
Net shares issued (cancelled) under stock compensation plans1,373 (3,171)
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan1,170 956 
Repurchases of common stock(3,080)(93,307)
Net cash provided by financing activities1,153,622 755,074 
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS(1,133,028)1,548,537 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD3,472,152 996,623 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD$2,339,124 $2,545,160 
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6




Simmons First National Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020

(In thousands, except share data)Preferred StockCommon
Stock
SurplusAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Undivided
Profits
Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
Balance, March 31, 2021 (Unaudited)$767 $1,083 $2,017,188 $(37,176)$948,913 $2,930,775 
Comprehensive income— — — 49,249 74,924 124,173 
Stock-based compensation plans, net – 40,937 shares
— 3,940 — — 3,941 
Dividends on preferred stock— — — — (13)(13)
Dividends on common stock – $0.18 per share
— — — — (19,510)(19,510)
Balance, June 30, 2021 (Unaudited)$767 $1,084 $2,021,128 $12,073 $1,004,314 $3,039,366 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Balance, March 31, 2020 (Unaudited)$767 $1,090 $2,026,420 $38,230 $778,893 $2,845,400 
Comprehensive income— — — 16,080 58,802 74,882 
Stock-based compensation plans, net – 28,058 shares
— — 2,963 — — 2,963 
Dividends on preferred stock— — — — (13)(13)
Dividends on common stock – $0.17 per share
— — — — (18,529)(18,529)
Balance, June 30, 2020 (Unaudited)$767 $1,090 $2,029,383 $54,310 $819,153 $2,904,703 
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7




Simmons First National Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020


(In thousands, except share data)Preferred StockCommon
Stock
SurplusAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Undivided
Profits
Total
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Balance, December 31, 2020$767 $1,081 $2,014,076 $59,726 $901,006 $2,976,656 
Comprehensive (loss) income— — — (47,653)142,344 94,691 
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan – 60,697 shares
— 1,169 — — 1,170 
Stock-based compensation plans, net – 379,226 shares
— 8,962 — — 8,965 
Stock repurchases – 130,916 shares
— (1)(3,079)— — (3,080)
Dividends on preferred stock
— — — — (26)(26)
Dividends on common stock – $0.36 per share
— — — — (39,010)(39,010)
Balance, June 30, 2021 (Unaudited)$767 $1,084 $2,021,128 $12,073 $1,004,314 $3,039,366 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Balance, December 31, 2019$767 $1,136 $2,117,282 $20,891 $848,848 $2,988,924 
Impact of ASU 2016-13 adoption— — — — (128,101)(128,101)
Comprehensive income— — — 33,419 136,038 169,457 
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan – 43,681 shares
— 955 — — 956 
Stock-based compensation plans, net – 244,443 shares
— 4,404 — — 4,406 
Stock repurchases – 4,922,336 shares
— (49)(93,258)— — (93,307)
Dividends on preferred stock— — — — (26)(26)
Dividends on common stock – $0.34 per share
— — — — (37,606)(37,606)
Balance, June 30, 2020 (Unaudited)$767 $1,090 $2,029,383 $54,310 $819,153 $2,904,703 



See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
8




SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(Unaudited)
 
NOTE 1: PREPARATION OF INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Description of Business and Organizational Structure
 
Simmons First National Corporation (“Company”) is a Mid-South financial holding company headquartered in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, and the parent company of Simmons Bank, an Arkansas state-chartered bank that has been in operation since 1903 (“Simmons Bank” or the “Bank”). Simmons First Insurance Services, Inc. and Simmons First Insurance Services of TN, LLC are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Simmons Bank and are insurance agencies that offer various lines of personal and corporate insurance coverage to individual and commercial customers. The Company, through its subsidiaries, offers, among other things, consumer, real estate and commercial loans; checking, savings and time deposits; and specialized products and services (such as credit cards, trust and fiduciary services, investments, agricultural finance lending, equipment lending, insurance and Small Business Administration (“SBA”) lending) from approximately 198 financial centers as of June 30, 2021, located throughout market areas in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared based upon Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that permit reduced disclosures for interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures have been condensed or omitted in accordance with those rules and regulations. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020, was derived from audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of interim results of operations, including normal recurring accruals. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. For a more complete discussion of significant accounting policies and certain other information, this report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the SEC on February 25, 2021.
 
The preparation of financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income items and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and assumptions used in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are based upon management’s evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and actual results may differ from these estimates. Such estimates include, but are not limited to, the Company’s allowance for credit losses.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans and the valuation of acquired loans. Management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties in connection with the determination of the allowance for credit losses and the valuation of foreclosed assets.
 
During the second quarter of 2021, certain debit and credit card transaction fees were reclassified from non-interest expense to non-interest income. These transaction fees, as well as additional certain prior year amounts, have been reclassified to conform to the current year financial statement presentation. These changes and reclassifications did not impact previously reported net income or comprehensive income. 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Reference Rate Reform – In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”), which provides relief for companies preparing for discontinuation of interest rates such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). LIBOR is a benchmark interest rate referenced in a variety of agreements that are used by numerous entities. On March 5, 2021, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced that the majority of LIBOR rates will no longer be published after December 31, 2021, although a number of key settings will continue until June
9




2023, to support the rundown of legacy contracts only. As a result, LIBOR should be discontinued as a reference rate. Other interest rates used globally could also be discontinued for similar reasons. ASU 2020-04 provides optional expedients and exceptions to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions affected by reference rate reform. The main provisions for contract modifications include optional relief by allowing the modification as a continuation of the existing contract without additional analysis and other optional expedients regarding embedded features. Optional expedients for hedge accounting permits changes to critical terms of hedging relationships and to the designated benchmark interest rate in a fair value hedge and also provides relief for assessing hedge effectiveness for cash flow hedges. Companies are able to apply ASU 2020-04 immediately; however, the guidance will only be available for a limited time (generally through December 31, 2022). The Company formed a LIBOR Transition Team in 2020, has created standard LIBOR replacement language for new and modified loan notes, and is monitoring the remaining loans with LIBOR rates monthly to ensure progress in updating these loans with acceptable LIBOR replacement language or converting them to other interest rates. The Company has not been offering LIBOR-indexed rates originated by other banks, subject to the Company’s determination that the LIBOR replacement language in the loan documents meets the Company’s standards. Pursuant to the Interagency Statement on LIBOR Transition issued in November 2020, the Company will not enter into any new LIBOR-based credit agreements after December 31, 2021. The adoption of ASU 2020-04 has not had a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope (“ASU 2021-01”), which clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the changes in the interest rates used for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment for derivative instruments that are being implemented as part of the market-wide transition to new reference rates (commonly referred to as the “discounting transition”). ASU 2021-01 also amends the expedients and exceptions in ASC 848 to capture the incremental consequences of the scope clarification and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition. ASU 2021-01 was effective upon issuance and generally can be applied through December 31, 2022. ASU 2021-01 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Income Taxes – In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), that removes certain exceptions for investments, intraperiod allocations and interim calculations, and adds guidance to reduce complexity in accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 introduces the following new guidance: i) guidance to evaluate whether a step-up in tax basis of goodwill relates to a business combination in which book goodwill was recognized or a separate transaction and ii) a policy election to not allocate consolidated income taxes when a member of a consolidated tax return is not subject to income tax. Additionally, ASU 2019-12 changes the following current guidance: i) making an intraperiod allocation, if there is a loss in continuing operations and gains outside of continuing operations, ii) determining when a deferred tax liability is recognized after an investor in a foreign entity transitions to or from the equity method of accounting, iii) accounting for tax law changes and year-to-date losses in interim periods, and iv) determining how to apply the income tax guidance to franchise taxes that are partially based on income. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 did not have a material impact on the Company’s operations, financial position or disclosures.

Fair Value Measurement Disclosures – In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”), that eliminates, amends and adds disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. These amendments are part of FASB’s disclosure review project and are expected to reduce costs for preparers while providing more decision-useful information for financial statement users. The eliminated disclosure requirements include the 1) the amount of, and reasons for, transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; 2) the policy of timing of transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy; and 3) the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. Among other modifications, the amended disclosure requirements remove the term “at a minimum” from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities and clarifies that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. Under the new disclosure requirements, entities must disclose the changes in unrealized gains or losses included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 did not have a material impact on the Company’s fair value disclosures.


10




Credit Losses on Financial Instruments – In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which requires earlier measurement of credit losses, expands the range of information considered in determining expected credit losses and enhances disclosures. The main objective of ASU 2016-13 is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendments replaced the incurred loss impairment methodology in US GAAP with a methodology (the current expected credit losses, or “CECL”, methodology) that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates.

The CECL methodology utilizes a lifetime “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses for loans, held-to-maturity debt securities and other receivables measured at amortized cost at the time the financial asset is originated or acquired. The allowance for credit losses is adjusted each period for changes in expected lifetime credit losses. This methodology replaced the multiple existing impairment methods in previous guidance, which generally required that a loss be incurred before it is recognized. Within the life cycle of a loan or other financial asset, this new guidance will generally result in the earlier recognition of the provision for credit losses and the related allowance for credit losses than previous practice. For available-for-sale debt securities that the Company intends to hold and where fair value is less than cost, credit-related impairment, if any, will be recognized through an allowance for credit losses and adjusted each period for changes in credit risk.

The effective date for these amendments was for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. In preparation for implementation of ASU 2016-13, the Company formed a cross functional team that assessed its data and system needs and evaluated the potential impact of adopting the new guidance. The Company anticipated a significant change in the processes and procedures to calculate the loan losses, including changes in assumptions and estimates to consider expected credit losses over the life of the loan versus the prior accounting practice that utilized the incurred loss model.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed in to law by the President of the United States (“President”) and allows the option to temporarily defer or suspend the adoption of ASU 2016-13. During the deferral, a registrant would continue to use the incurred loss model for the allowance for loan and lease losses and would be in accordance with US GAAP. The Company did not elect to temporarily defer the adoption of ASU 2016-13 and adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2020. Upon adoption, the Company recorded an additional allowance for credit losses on loans of approximately $151.4 million and an adjustment to the reserve for unfunded commitments recorded in other liabilities of $24.0 million. The Company also recorded an additional allowance for credit losses on investment securities of $742,000. The impact at adoption was reflected as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings, net of income taxes, in the amount of $128.1 million.

The significant impact to the Company’s allowance for credit losses at the date of adoption was driven by the substantial amount of loans acquired held by the Company. The Company had approximately one third of total loans categorized as acquired at the adoption date with very little reserve allocated to them due to the previous incurred loss impairment methodology. As such, the amount of the CECL adoption impact was greater on the Company when compared to a non-acquisitive bank of a similar size.

In December 2018, the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) (collectively, the “agencies”) issued a final rule revising regulatory capital rules in anticipation of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 that provided an option to phase in over a three year period on a straight line basis the day-one impact on earnings and Tier 1 capital (the “CECL Transition Provision”).

In March 2020 and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the agencies issued a new regulatory capital rule revising the CECL Transition Provision to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of ASU 2016-13. The rule provides banking organizations that implement CECL before the end of 2020 the option to delay for two years an estimate of CECL’s effect on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period (the “2020 CECL Transition Provision”). The Company elected to apply the 2020 CECL Transition Provision.

The Company used the prospective transition approach for financial assets purchased with credit deterioration (“PCD”) that were previously classified as purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) and accounted for under ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. The Company increased the allowance for credit losses by approximately $5.4 million at adoption for the assets previously identified as PCI. In accordance with ASU 2016-13, the Company did not reassess whether PCI assets met the criteria of PCD assets as of the date of adoption.
11




Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Leases - In July 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-05, Leases (Topic 842): Lessors-Certain Leases with Variable Lease Payments (“ASU 2021-05”), that amends lease classification requirements for lessors. In accordance with ASU 2021-05, lessors should classify and account for a lease that have variable lease payments that do not depend on a reference index rate as an operating lease if both of the following criteria are met: i) the lease would have been classified as a sales-type lease or a direct financing lease under the previous lease classification criteria and ii) sales-type or direct financing lease classification would result in a Day 1 loss. ASU 2021-05 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard, but the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

There have been no other significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies from the 2020 Form 10-K. Presently, the Company is not aware of any other changes to the Accounting Standards Codification that will have a material impact on its present or future financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 2: PROPOSED ACQUISITIONS

Landmark Community Bank

On June 4, 2021, the Company and the Bank entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Landmark Agreement”) with Landmark Community Bank (“Landmark”), headquartered in Collierville, Tennessee, pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Landmark Agreement, Landmark will merge with and into the Bank, with the Bank continuing as the surviving entity. According to the terms of the Landmark Agreement, upon consummation of the merger, holders of Landmark’s common stock and common stock equivalents will receive, in the aggregate, 4,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and $7,000,000, all subject to certain conditions and potential adjustments under the Landmark agreement.

Landmark conducts banking business from 8 branches located in the Memphis and Nashville, Tennessee, metropolitan areas. As of June 30, 2021, Landmark had approximately $986.7 million in assets, $783.1 million in loans and $823.1 million in deposits. Completion of the Landmark transaction is expected during the fourth quarter of 2021 and is subject to certain closing conditions, including approval by the shareholders of Landmark and customary regulatory approvals.

Triumph Bancshares, Inc.

On June 4, 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Triumph Agreement”) with Triumph Bancshares, Inc. (“Triumph”), the parent company of Triumph Bank, headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee, pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Triumph Agreement, Triumph will merge with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation. According to the terms of the Triumph Agreement, upon consummation of the merger, holders of Triumph’s common stock and common stock equivalents will receive, in the aggregate, 4,164,839 shares of the Company’s common stock and $2,645,937.83, all subject to certain conditions and potential adjustments under the Triumph Agreement.

Triumph conducts banking business from 6 branches located in the Memphis and Nashville, Tennessee, metropolitan areas. As of June 30, 2021, Triumph had approximately $886.7 million in assets, $715.8 million in loans and $712.8 million in deposits. Completion of the Triumph transaction is expected during the fourth quarter of 2021 and is subject to certain closing conditions, including approval by the shareholders of Triumph and customary regulatory approvals.

12




NOTE 3: INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Held-to-maturity securities (“HTM”), which include any security for which the Company has both the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity, are carried at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Premiums and discounts are amortized and accreted, respectively, to interest income using the constant effective yield method over the security’s estimated life. Prepayments are anticipated for mortgage-backed and SBA securities. Premiums on callable securities are amortized to their earliest call date.

Available-for-sale securities (“AFS”), which include any security for which the Company has no immediate plan to sell but which may be sold in the future, are carried at fair value. Realized gains and losses, based on specifically identified amortized cost of the individual security, are included in other income. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded, net of related income tax effects, in stockholders’ equity, further discussed below. Premiums and discounts are amortized and accreted, respectively, to interest income using the constant effective yield method over the estimated life of the security. Prepayments are anticipated for mortgage-backed and SBA securities. Premiums on callable securities are amortized to their earliest call date.

The amortized cost, fair value and allowance for credit losses of investment securities that are classified as HTM are as follows: 

(In thousands)Amortized CostAllowance
for Credit Losses
Net Carrying AmountGross Unrealized
Gains
Gross Unrealized
(Losses)
Estimated Fair
Value
Held-to-maturity   
June 30, 2021
U.S. Government agencies$77,396 $— $77,396 $— $(2,054)$75,342 
Mortgage-backed securities 60,649 — 60,649 474 (729)60,394 
State and political subdivisions
794,178 (871)793,307 8,118 (2,523)798,902 
Other securities261 (261)— 958 — 958 
Total HTM$932,484 $(1,132)$931,352 $9,550 $(5,306)$935,596 
December 31, 2020
Mortgage-backed securities $22,354 $— $22,354 $683 $— $23,037 
State and political subdivisions
312,416 (2,307)310,109 8,148 (30)318,227 
Other securities1,176 (608)568 93 — 661 
Total HTM$335,946 $(2,915)$333,031 $8,924 $(30)$341,925 

Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) are commercial MBS, secured by commercial properties, and residential MBS, generally secured by single-family residential properties. As of June 30, 2021, HTM MBS consists of $6.1 million and $54.5 million of commercial MBS and residential MBS, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, HTM MBS consists of $7.7 million and $14.7 million of commercial MBS and residential MBS, respectively.

The amortized cost, fair value and allowance for credit losses of investment securities that are classified as AFS are as follows:

(In thousands)Amortized
Cost
Allowance
for Credit Losses
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Gross Unrealized
(Losses)
Estimated Fair
Value
Available-for-sale
June 30, 2021
U.S. Treasury$600 $— $— $— $600 
U.S. Government agencies567,722 — 720 (13,505)554,937 
Mortgage-backed securities3,996,823 — 13,405 (23,019)3,987,209 
State and political subdivisions1,526,833 — 36,945 (6,281)1,557,497 
Other securities451,044 — 8,291 (2,997)456,338 
Total AFS$6,543,022 $— $59,361 $(45,802)$6,556,581 
13




(In thousands)Amortized
Cost
Allowance
for Credit Losses
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Gross Unrealized
(Losses)
Estimated Fair
Value
December 31, 2020
U.S. Government agencies$477,693 $— $844 $(1,300)$477,237 
Mortgage-backed securities1,374,769 — 21,261 (1,094)1,394,936 
State and political subdivisions1,416,136 (217)55,111 (307)1,470,723 
Other securities128,445 (95)2,447 (95)130,702 
Total AFS$3,397,043 $(312)$79,663 $(2,796)$3,473,598 

As of June 30, 2021, AFS MBS consists of $1.34 billion and $2.65 billion of commercial MBS and residential MBS, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, AFS MBS consists of $406.1 million and $988.8 million of commercial MBS and residential MBS, respectively.

Accrued interest receivable on HTM and AFS securities at June 30, 2021 was $4.2 million and $21.8 million, respectively, and is included in interest receivable on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company has made the election to exclude all accrued interest receivable from securities from the estimate of credit losses.

The following table summarizes the Company’s AFS investments in an unrealized loss position for which an allowance for credit loss has not been recorded as of June 30, 2021, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

 Less Than 12 Months12 Months or MoreTotal
(In thousands)Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Available-for-sale
U.S. Government agencies$429,402 $(13,091)$35,862 $(414)$465,264 $(13,505)
Mortgage-backed securities2,196,453 (23,016)290 (3)2,196,743 (23,019)
State and political subdivisions377,432 (6,196)2,485 (85)379,917 (6,281)
Other securities142,041 (2,997)— — 142,041 (2,997)
Total AFS$3,145,328 $(45,300)$38,637 $(502)$3,183,965 $(45,802)
 
As of June 30, 2021, the Company’s investment portfolio included $6.6 billion of AFS securities, of which $3.2 billion, or 48.6%, were in an unrealized loss position that were not deemed to have credit losses. A portion of the unrealized losses were related to the Company’s MBS, which are issued and guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, and the Company’s state and political subdivision securities, specifically investments in insured fixed rate municipal bonds for which the issuers continue to make timely principal and interest payments under the contractual terms of the securities.

Furthermore, the decline in fair value for each of the above AFS securities is attributable to the rates for those investments yielding less than current market rates. Management does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons of credit quality. Management believes the declines in fair value for the securities are temporary. Management does not have the intent to sell the securities, and management believes it is more likely than not the Company will not have to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.

Allowance for Credit Losses

All MBS held by the Company are issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies. These securities are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government, highly rated by major rating agencies and have a long history of no credit losses. Accordingly, no allowance for credit losses has been recorded for these securities.

Regarding securities issued by state and political subdivisions and other HTM securities, management considers (i) issuer bond ratings, (ii) historical loss rates for given bond ratings, (iii) whether issuers continue to make timely principal and interest payments under the contractual terms of the securities, (iv) internal forecasts, and (v) whether or not such securities provide insurance or other credit enhancement or are pre-refunded by the issuers.
14




The following table details activity in the allowance for credit losses by investment security type for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 on the Company’s HTM and AFS securities portfolios.

(In thousands)State and Political SubdivisionsOther
Securities
Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
Held-to-maturity
Beginning balance, April 1, 2021$1,042 $576 $1,618 
Provision for credit loss expense(171)(315)(486)
Ending balance, June 30, 2021$871 $261 $1,132 
Available-for-sale
Beginning balance, April 1, 2021$64 $2,390 $2,454 
Net decrease in allowance on previously impaired securities(64)(2,390)(2,454)
Ending balance, June 30, 2021$— $— $— 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Held-to-maturity
Beginning balance, January 1, 2021$2,307 $608 $2,915 
Provision for credit loss expense(1,436)253 (1,183)
Securities charged-off— (600)(600)
Ending balance, June 30, 2021$871 $261 $1,132 
Available-for-sale
Beginning balance, January 1, 2021$217 $95 $312 
Reduction due to sales— (11)(11)
Net decrease in allowance on previously impaired securities(217)(84)(301)
Ending balance, June 30, 2021$— $— $— 

Activity in the allowance for credit losses by investment security type for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 on the Company’s HTM and AFS securities portfolio was as follows:

(In thousands)State and Political SubdivisionsOther
Securities
Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Held-to-maturity
Beginning balance, April 1, 2020$97 $312 $409 
Provision for credit loss expense(2)(100)(102)
Ending balance, June 30, 2020$95 $212 $307 
Available-for-sale
Beginning balance, April 1, 2020$95 $174 $269 
Credit losses on securities not previously recorded370 160 530 
Net decrease in allowance on previously impaired securities(94)(96)(190)
Ending balance, June 30, 2020$371 $238 $609 
15




(In thousands)State and Political SubdivisionsOther
Securities
Total
Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Held-to-maturity
Beginning balance, January 1, 2020$— $— $— 
Impact of ASU 2016-13 adoption
58 311 369 
Provision for credit loss expense37 (99)(62)
Ending balance, June 30, 2020$95 $212 $307 
Available-for-sale
Beginning balance, January 1, 2020$— $— $— 
Impact of ASU 2016-13 adoption
373 — 373 
Credit losses on securities not previously recorded77 192 269 
Reduction due to sales(142)— (142)
Net increase in allowance on previously impaired securities63 46 109 
Ending balance, June 30, 2020$371 $238 $609 

Based upon the Company’s analysis of the underlying risk characteristics of its AFS portfolio, including credit ratings and other qualitative factors, as previously discussed, the provision for credit losses related to AFS securities was reduced by $2,454,000 and $312,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the provision for credit losses was $340,000 and $236,000, respectively, related to AFS securities.

The following table summarizes bond ratings for the Company’s HTM portfolio, based upon amortized cost, issued by state and political subdivisions and other securities as of June 30, 2021:

State and Political Subdivisions
(In thousands)Not Guaranteed or Pre-RefundedOther Credit Enhancement or InsurancePre-RefundedTotalOther Securities
Aaa/AAA$63,864 $57,797 $— $121,661 $— 
Aa/AA308,600 130,664 — 439,264 — 
A31,365 9,970 — 41,335 — 
Not Rated185,598 6,320 — 191,918 261 
Total$589,427 $204,751 $— $794,178 $261 

Historical loss rates associated with securities having similar grades as those in the Company’s portfolio have generally not been significant. Pre-refunded securities, if any, have been defeased by the issuer and are fully secured by cash and/or U.S. Treasury securities held in escrow for payment to holders when the underlying call dates of the securities are reached. Securities with other credit enhancement or insurance continue to make timely principal and interest payments under the contractual terms of the securities. Accordingly, no allowance for credit losses has been recorded for these securities as there is no current expectation of credit losses related to these securities.


16




Income earned on securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, is as follows:


Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)2021202020212020
Taxable:  
Held-to-maturity$837 $288 $1,350 $459 
Available-for-sale13,757 7,086 23,364 19,667 
Non-taxable:
Held-to-maturity3,030 68 5,034 140 
Available-for-sale9,504 6,031 18,953 12,150 
Total$27,128 $13,473 $48,701 $32,416 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value by maturity of securities as of June 30, 2021 are shown in the following table. Securities are classified according to their contractual maturities without consideration of principal amortization, potential prepayments or call options. Accordingly, actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities. 

 Held-to-MaturityAvailable-for-Sale
(In thousands)Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
One year or less$6,819 $6,884 $11,777 $11,834 
After one through five years7,680 8,029 51,854 52,281 
After five through ten years9,734 10,115 531,599 537,748 
After ten years847,602 850,174 1,949,938 1,966,476 
Securities not due on a single maturity date60,649 60,394 3,996,823 3,987,209 
Other securities (no maturity)— — 1,031 1,033 
Total$932,484 $935,596 $6,543,022 $6,556,581 
 
The carrying value, which approximates the fair value, of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, amounted to $3.89 billion at June 30, 2021 and $2.01 billion at December 31, 2020. 

There were approximately $5.2 million of gross realized gains and $26,000 of gross realized losses from the sale of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2021, and approximately $10.6 million of gross realized gains and $39,000 of gross realized losses from the sale of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2021. The Company sold approximately $249.5 million of investment securities during the six months ended June 30, 2021. There were approximately $391,000 of gross realized gains and $1,000 of gross realized losses from the sale of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2020, and approximately $32.5 million of gross realized gains and $2,600 of gross realized losses from the sale of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2020. During the first half of 2020, the Company sold approximately $1.2 billion of investment securities to create additional liquidity. The income tax expense/benefit related to security gains/losses was 26.135% of the gross amounts in 2021 and 2020.

NOTE 4: OTHER LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE

Illinois Branch Sale

On November 30, 2020, the Company’s subsidiary bank, Simmons Bank, entered into a Branch Purchase and Assumption Agreement (the “Citizens Equity Agreement”) with Citizens Equity First Credit Union (“CEFCU”).

On March 12, 2021, CEFCU completed its purchase of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities (“Illinois Branch Sale”) associated with four Simmons Bank locations in the Metro East area of Southern Illinois, near St. Louis (collectively, the “Illinois Branches”). Pursuant to the terms of the Citizens Equity Agreement, CEFCU assumed certain deposit liabilities and acquired certain loans, as well as cash, personal property and other fixed assets associated with the Illinois Branches.

17




The Company recognized a gain on sale of $5.3 million related to the Illinois Branches in the six month period ended June 30, 2021.

As of June 30, 2021, there were no outstanding other liabilities held for sale.

NOTE 5: LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

At June 30, 2021, the Company’s loan portfolio was $11.39 billion, compared to $12.90 billion at December 31, 2020. The various categories of loans are summarized as follows:
 
June 30,December 31,
(In thousands)20212020
Consumer:  
Credit cards$177,634 $188,845 
Other consumer181,712 202,379 
Total consumer359,346 391,224 
Real Estate:
Construction and development1,428,165 1,596,255 
Single family residential1,608,028 1,880,673 
Other commercial5,332,655 5,746,863 
Total real estate8,368,848 9,223,791 
Commercial:
Commercial2,074,729 2,574,386 
Agricultural193,462 175,905 
Total commercial2,268,191 2,750,291 
Other389,967 535,591 
Total loans$11,386,352 $12,900,897 

The above table presents total loans at amortized cost. The difference between amortized cost and unpaid principal balance is primarily premiums and discounts associated with acquisition date fair value adjustments on acquired loans as well as net deferred origination fees totaling $43.7 million and $57.3 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

Accrued interest on loans, which is excluded from the amortized cost of loans held for investment, totaled $41.9 million and $54.4 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, and is included in interest receivable on the consolidated balance sheets.

Loan Origination/Risk Management – The Company seeks to manage its credit risk by diversifying its loan portfolio, determining that borrowers have adequate sources of cash flow for loan repayment without liquidation of collateral; obtaining and monitoring collateral; and providing an adequate allowance for credit losses by regularly reviewing loans through the internal loan review process. The loan portfolio is diversified by borrower, purpose and industry. The Company seeks to use diversification within the loan portfolio to reduce its credit risk, thereby minimizing the adverse impact on the portfolio if weaknesses develop in either the economy or a particular segment of borrowers. Collateral requirements are based on credit assessments of borrowers and may be used to recover the debt in case of default.
 
Consumer – The consumer loan portfolio consists of credit card loans and other consumer loans. Credit card loans are diversified by geographic region to reduce credit risk and minimize any adverse impact on the portfolio. Although they are regularly reviewed to facilitate the identification and monitoring of creditworthiness, credit card loans are unsecured loans, making them more susceptible to economic downturns that result in increased unemployment. Other consumer loans include direct and indirect installment loans and account overdrafts. Loans in this portfolio segment are sensitive to unemployment and other key consumer economic measures.
 

18




Real estate – The real estate loan portfolio consists of construction and development loans (“C&D”), single family residential loans and commercial loans. C&D and commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans can be particularly sensitive to valuation of real estate. CRE cycles are inevitable. The long planning and production process for new properties and rapid shifts in business conditions and employment create an inherent tension between supply and demand for commercial properties. While general economic trends often move individual markets in the same direction over time, the timing and magnitude of changes are determined by other forces unique to each market. CRE cycles tend to be local in nature and longer than other credit cycles. Factors influencing the CRE market are traditionally different from those affecting residential real estate markets; thereby making predictions for one market based on the other difficult. Additionally, submarkets within CRE – such as office, industrial, apartment, retail and hotel – also experience different cycles, providing an opportunity to lower the overall risk through diversification across types of CRE loans. Management realizes that local demand and supply conditions will also mean that different geographic areas will experience cycles of different amplitude and duration. The Company monitors these loans closely. 

Commercial – The commercial loan portfolio includes commercial and agricultural loans, representing loans to commercial customers and farmers for use in normal business or farming operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases or other expansion projects. Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans are also included in the commercial loan portfolio. Collection risk in this portfolio is driven by the creditworthiness of the underlying borrowers, particularly cash flow from customers’ business or farming operations. The Company continues its efforts to keep loan terms short, reducing the negative impact of upward movement in interest rates. Term loans are generally set up with one or three year balloons, and the Company has instituted a pricing mechanism for commercial loans. It is standard practice to require personal guaranties on commercial loans for closely-held or limited liability entities.

Paycheck Protection Program Loans – The Company originated loans pursuant to multiple PPP appropriations of the CARES Act which provided 100% federally guaranteed loans for small businesses to cover up to 24 weeks of payroll costs and assistance with mortgage interest, rent and utilities. Notably, these small business loans may be forgiven by the SBA if borrowers maintain their payrolls and satisfy certain other conditions. PPP loans have a zero percent risk-weight for regulatory capital ratios. As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the total outstanding balance of PPP loans was $441.4 million and $904.7 million, respectively.

Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans – Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on nonaccrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

The amortized cost basis of nonaccrual loans segregated by category of loans are as follows:

June 30,December 31,
(In thousands)20212020
Consumer:  
Credit cards$282 $301 
Other consumer594 1,219 
Total consumer876 1,520 
Real estate:
Construction and development1,737 3,625 
Single family residential29,553 28,062 
Other commercial19,018 24,155 
Total real estate50,308 55,842 
Commercial:
Commercial28,649 65,244 
Agricultural449 273 
Total commercial29,098 65,517 
Total$80,282 $122,879 

19




As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, nonaccrual loans for which there was no related allowance for credit losses had an amortized cost of $15.7 million and $16.8 million, respectively. These loans are individually assessed and do not hold an allowance due to being adequately collateralized under the collateral-dependent valuation method.

An age analysis of the amortized cost basis of past due loans, including nonaccrual loans, segregated by class of loans is as follows: 
(In thousands)Gross
30-89 Days
Past Due
90 Days
or More
Past Due
Total
Past Due
CurrentTotal
Loans
90 Days
Past Due &
Accruing
June 30, 2021      
Consumer:      
Credit cards$644 $273 $917 $176,717 $177,634 $132 
Other consumer944 121 1,065 180,647 181,712 — 
Total consumer1,588 394 1,982 357,364 359,346 132 
Real estate:
Construction and development4,360 1,595 5,955 1,422,210 1,428,165 — 
Single family residential6,883 8,061 14,944 1,593,084 1,608,028 — 
Other commercial11,846 15,242 27,088 5,305,567 5,332,655 127 
Total real estate23,089 24,898 47,987 8,320,861 8,368,848 127 
Commercial:
Commercial18,162 9,167 27,329 2,047,400 2,074,729 394 
Agricultural105 353 458 193,004 193,462 — 
Total commercial18,267 9,520 27,787 2,240,404 2,268,191 394 
Other— — — 389,967 389,967 — 
Total$42,944 $34,812 $77,756 $11,308,596 $11,386,352 $653 
December 31, 2020
Consumer:
Credit cards$708 $256 $964 $187,881 $188,845 $256 
Other consumer2,771 302 3,073 199,306 202,379 13 
Total consumer3,479 558 4,037 387,187 391,224 269 
Real estate:
Construction and development1,375 3,089 4,464 1,591,791 1,596,255 — 
Single family residential23,726 14,339 38,065 1,842,608 1,880,673 253 
Other commercial2,660 9,586 12,246 5,734,617 5,746,863 — 
Total real estate27,761 27,014 54,775 9,169,016 9,223,791 253 
Commercial:
Commercial7,514 7,429 14,943 2,559,443 2,574,386 56 
Agricultural226 187 413 175,492 175,905 — 
Total commercial7,740 7,616 15,356 2,734,935 2,750,291 56 
Other92 — 92 535,499 535,591 — 
Total$39,072 $35,188 $74,260 $12,826,637 $12,900,897 $578 
 
When the Company restructures a loan to a borrower that is experiencing financial difficulty and grants a concession that it would not otherwise consider, a “troubled debt restructuring” (“TDR”) results and the Company classifies the loan as a TDR. The Company grants various types of concessions, primarily interest rate reduction and/or payment modifications or extensions, with an occasional forgiveness of principal.


20




Once an obligation has been restructured because of such credit problems, it continues to be considered a TDR until paid in full; or, if an obligation yields a market interest rate and no longer has any concession regarding payment amount or amortization, then it is not considered a TDR at the beginning of the calendar year after the year in which the improvement takes place. The Company returns TDRs to accrual status only if (1) all contractual amounts due can reasonably be expected to be repaid within a prudent period and (2) repayment has been in accordance with the contract for a sustained period, typically at least six months.

The provisions in the CARES Act included an election to not apply the guidance on accounting for TDRs to loan modifications, such as extensions or deferrals, related to COVID-19 made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of (i) December 31, 2020 or (ii) 60 days after the President terminates the COVID-19 national emergency declaration. In March 2020, the federal financial institution regulatory agencies issued an interagency statement encouraging financial institutions to work constructively with borrowers affected by COVID-19 and provided information regarding loan modifications. The relief can only be applied to modifications for borrowers that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The Company elected to adopt these provisions of the CARES Act. In response to the concerns related to the expiration of the applicable period for which the election to not apply the guidance on accounting for TDRs to loan modifications, the CARES Act was amended in late fourth quarter of 2020 to extend COVID-19 relief related to loan modifications to the earlier of (i) January 1, 2022 or (ii) 60 days after the President terminates the COVID-19 national emergency declaration. As of June 30, 2021, the Company had 43 COVID-19 loan modifications outstanding in the amount of $134.5 million. Deferred interest on these loan modifications will be collected at the end of the note or once regular payments are resumed.

TDRs are individually evaluated for expected credit losses. The Company assesses the exposure for each modification, either by the fair value of the underlying collateral or the present value of expected cash flows, and determines if a specific allowance for credit losses is needed.

The following table presents a summary of TDRs segregated by class of loans.

 Accruing TDR LoansNonaccrual TDR LoansTotal TDR Loans
(Dollars in thousands)NumberBalanceNumberBalanceNumberBalance
June 30, 2021      
Real estate:
Single-family residential29 $3,074 13 $1,242 42 $4,316 
Other commercial825 830 
Total real estate31 3,899 14 1,247 45 5,146 
Commercial:
Commercial537 1,413 1,950 
Total commercial537 1,413 1,950 
Total32 $4,436 17 $2,660 49 $7,096 
December 31, 2020
Real estate:
Single-family residential28 $2,463 18 $2,736 46 $5,199 
Other commercial49 12 61 
Total real estate29 2,512 19 2,748 48 5,260 
Commercial:
Commercial626 1,627 2,253 
Total commercial626 1,627 2,253 
Total32 $3,138 22 $4,375 54 $7,513 


21




The following table presents loans that were restructured as TDRs during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.
 
(Dollars in thousands)Number of loansBalance Prior to TDRBalance at June 30,Change in Maturity DateChange in RateFinancial Impact on Date of Restructure
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021     
Real estate:
Other commercial$784 $778 $— $778 $— 
Total real estate$784 $778 $— $778 $— 
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Real estate:
Single-family residential$147 $147 $147 $— $— 
Total real estate$147 $147 $147 $— $— 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the Company modified one loan with a recorded investment of $784,000 prior to modification which was deemed a TDR. The restructured loan was modified by deferring amortized principal payments and requiring interest only payments for a period of up to 12 months. A specific reserve of approximately $5,100 was recorded with respect to this TDR. Also, there was no immediate financial impact from the restructuring of this loan, as it was not considered necessary to charge-off interest or principal on the date of restructure.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company modified one loan with a recorded investment of $147,000 prior to modification which was deemed troubled debt restructuring. The restructured loan was modified by deferring amortized principal payments, changing the maturity date and requiring interest only payments for a period of up to 12 months. A specific reserve of $7,200 was determined necessary for this loan. Also, there was no immediate financial impact from the restructuring of this loan, as it was not considered necessary to charge-off interest or principal on the date of restructure.

Additionally, there were no loans considered TDRs for which a payment default occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2021 or 2020. The Company defines a payment default as a payment received more than 90 days after its due date.

There were no TDRs with pre-modification loan balances for which Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) was received in full or partial satisfaction of the loans during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 or 2020. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had $3,364,000 and $7,182,000, respectively, of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had $1,752,000 and $3,172,000, respectively, of OREO secured by residential real estate properties.

Credit Quality Indicators – As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to (i) the weighted-average risk rating of commercial and real estate loans, (ii) the level of classified commercial and real estate loans, (iii) net charge-offs, (iv) non-performing loans (see details above) and (v) the general economic conditions of the Company’s local markets.

The Company utilizes a risk rating matrix to assign a risk rate to each of its commercial and real estate loans. Risk ratings are updated on an ongoing basis and are subject to change by continuous loan monitoring processes including lending management monitoring, executive management and board committee oversight, and independent credit review. A description of the general characteristics of the risk ratings is as follows:
 
Pass (Excellent) – This category includes loans which are virtually free of credit risk. Borrowers in this category represent the highest credit quality and greatest financial strength.
Pass (Good) - Loans under this category possess a nominal risk of default. This category includes borrowers with strong financial strength and superior financial ratios and trends. These loans are generally fully secured by cash or equivalents (other than those rated “excellent”).
22




Pass (Acceptable – Average) - Loans in this category are considered to possess a normal level of risk. Borrowers in this category have satisfactory financial strength and adequate cash flow coverage to service debt requirements. If secured, the perfected collateral should be of acceptable quality and within established borrowing parameters.
Pass (Monitor) - Loans in the Watch (Monitor) category exhibit an overall acceptable level of risk, but that risk may be increased by certain conditions, which represent “red flags”. These “red flags” require a higher level of supervision or monitoring than the normal “Pass” rated credit. The borrower may be experiencing these conditions for the first time, or it may be recovering from weakness, which at one time justified a higher rating. These conditions may include: weaknesses in financial trends; marginal cash flow; one-time negative operating results; non-compliance with policy or borrowing agreements; poor diversity in operations; lack of adequate monitoring information or lender supervision; questionable management ability/stability.
Special Mention - A loan in this category has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention loans are not adversely classified (although they are “criticized”) and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. Borrowers may be experiencing adverse operating trends or an ill-proportioned balance sheet. Non-financial characteristics of a Special Mention rating may include management problems, pending litigation, a non-existent or ineffective loan agreement or other material structural weakness, and/or other significant deviation from prudent lending practices.
Substandard - A Substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. The loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. This does not imply ultimate loss of the principal, but may involve burdensome administrative expenses and the accompanying cost to carry the loan.
Doubtful - A loan classified Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard loan except that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full (on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values) highly questionable and improbable. Doubtful borrowers are usually in default, lack adequate liquidity or capital, and lack the resources necessary to remain an operating entity. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of specific pending events that may strengthen the asset, its classification as loss is deferred. Pending factors include: proposed merger or acquisition; liquidation procedures; capital injection; perfection of liens on additional collateral; and refinancing plans. Loans classified as Doubtful are placed on nonaccrual status.
Loss - Loans classified Loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loans has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless loan, even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. Borrowers in the Loss category are often in bankruptcy, have formally suspended debt repayments, or have otherwise ceased normal business operations. Loans should be classified as Loss and charged-off in the period in which they become uncollectible.
The Company monitors credit quality in the consumer portfolio by delinquency status. The delinquency status of loans is updated daily. A description of the delinquency credit quality indicators is as follows:

Current - Loans in this category are either current in payments or are under 30 days past due. These loans are considered to have a normal level of risk.
30-89 Days Past Due - Loans in this category are between 30 and 89 days past due and are subject to the Company’s loss mitigation process. These loans are considered to have a moderate level of risk.
90+ Days Past Due - Loans in this category are 90 days or more past due and are placed on nonaccrual status. These loans have been subject to the Company’s loss mitigation process and foreclosure and/or charge-off proceedings have commenced.

Effective April 2021, the Company implemented an expanded, dual risk rating scale that utilizes quantitative models and qualitative factors (“score cards”) to assist in determining the appropriate risk rating for its commercial loans. This dual risk rating methodology incorporates a “probability of default” analysis which utilizes quantified metrics such as loan terms and financial performance, as well as a “loss given default” analysis which utilizes collateral values and economics of the market, among other attributes. Model outputs are reviewed and analyzed to ensure the projected risk levels are commensurate with underwriting and credit leader expectations. The expanded risk rating scale includes Probability of Default levels of 1 – 16 and Loss Given Default levels of A – I. The expanded scale allows for more granular recognition of risk and diversification of grading among traditional Pass grades. Implementation of the expanded risk rating scale did not have a material impact on the results of the allowance for credit losses calculation.
23




The following tables present a summary of loans by credit quality indicator, other than pass or current, as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 segregated by class of loans.

Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
(In thousands)2021 (YTD)20202019201820172016 and PriorLines of Credit (“LOC”) Amortized Cost BasisLOC Converted to Term Loans Amortized Cost BasisTotal
June 30, 2021
Consumer - credit cards    
Delinquency:
30-89 days past due$— $— $— $— $— $— $644 $— $644 
90+ days past due— — — — — — 273 — 273 
Total consumer - credit cards— — — — — — 917 — 917 
Consumer - other
Delinquency:
30-89 days past due44 193 81 174 178 208 66 — 944 
90+ days past due— 13 56 33 17 — — 121 
Total consumer - other44 206 137 176 211 225 66 — 1,065 
Real estate - C&D
Risk rating:
Special mention— — 292 — 1,360 — — — 1,652 
Substandard1,740 42 547 401 333 733 10,513 1,954 16,263 
Doubtful and loss— — — — — — — — — 
Total real estate - C&D1,740 42 839 401 1,693 733 10,513 1,954 17,915 
Real estate - SF residential
Delinquency:
30-89 days past due111 1,034 540 2,033 844 1,744 505 72 6,883 
90+ days past due— 69 1,203 2,177 1,870 2,197 545 — 8,061 
Total real estate - SF residential111 1,103 1,743 4,210 2,714 3,941 1,050 72 14,944 
Real estate - other commercial
Risk rating:
Special mention30,225 69,187 1,818 8,584 40,531 34,225 127,273 18,393 330,236 
Substandard25,532 25,865 6,477 15,304 33,640 23,723 50,734 20,480 201,755 
Doubtful and loss— — — — — — — — — 
Total real estate - other commercial55,757 95,052 8,295 23,888 74,171 57,948 178,007 38,873 531,991 
Commercial
Risk rating:
Special mention— 1,247 354 523 392 752 5,380 12,438 21,086 
Substandard3,627 21,024 3,616 2,035 796 799 25,859 6,601 64,357 
Doubtful and loss— — — — — — — — — 
Total commercial3,627 22,271 3,970 2,558 1,188 1,551 31,239 19,039 85,443 
Commercial - agriculture
Risk rating:
Special mention— — 10 15 — — — 31 
Substandard105 65 121 294 64 20 229 72 970 
Doubtful and loss— — — — — — — — — 
Total commercial - agriculture105 65 127 304 79 20 229 72 1,001 
Other
Delinquency:
30-89 days past due— — — — — — — — — 
90+ days past due— — — — — — — — — 
Total other— — — — — — — — — 
Total$61,384 $118,739 $15,111 $31,537 $80,056 $64,418 $222,021 $60,010 $653,276 
24




Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
(In thousands)202020192018201720162015 and PriorLines of Credit (“LOC”) Amortized Cost BasisLOC Converted to Term Loans Amortized Cost BasisTotal
December 31, 2020
Consumer - credit cards    
Delinquency:
30-89 days past due$— $— $— $— $— $— $708 $— $708 
90+ days past due— — — — — — 256 — 256 
Total consumer - credit cards— — — — — — 964 — 964 
Consumer - other
Delinquency:
30-89 days past due234 441 327 658 689 84 339 — 2,772 
90+ days past due79 58 25 80 40 12 — 302 
Total consumer - other313 499 352 738 729 96 347 — 3,074 
Real estate - C&D
Risk rating:
Special mention2,728 344 259 2,107 19 — 9,613 — 15,070 
Substandard294 2,069 404 449 342 320 17,914 14 21,806 
Doubtful and loss— — — — — — — — — 
Total real estate - C&D3,022 2,413 663 2,556 361 320 27,527 14 36,876 
Real estate - SF residential
Delinquency:
30-89 days past due6,300 2,258 2,593 2,610 2,058 6,050 1,782 76 23,727 
90+ days past due557 1,853 2,735 2,582 832 3,852 1,928 — 14,339 
Total real estate - SF residential6,857 4,111 5,328 5,192 2,890 9,902 3,710 76 38,066 
Real estate - other commercial
Risk rating:
Special mention100,085 4,346 10,738 19,943 26,245 10,608 63,305 23,435 258,705 
Substandard66,737 9,418 24,380 14,067 3,744 11,158 52,182 39,486 221,172 
Doubtful and loss— — — — — — — — — 
Total real estate - other commercial166,822 13,764 35,118 34,010 29,989 21,766 115,487 62,921 479,877 
Commercial
Risk rating:
Special mention5,707 342 465 972 54 — 12,318 22,546 42,404 
Substandard23,227 4,495 1,586 730 276 334 53,682 7,522 91,852 
Doubtful and loss— — — — — — — — — 
Total commercial28,934 4,837 2,051 1,702 330 334 66,000 30,068 134,256 
Commercial - agriculture
Risk rating:
Special mention— 79 13 299 — 34 — 431 
Substandard86 101 64 47 12 10 68 75 463 
Doubtful and loss— — — — — — — — — 
Total commercial - agriculture86 180 77 346 12 16 102 75 894 
Total$206,034 $25,804 $43,589 $44,544 $34,311 $32,434 $214,137 $93,154 $694,007 
25




Allowance for Credit Losses

Allowance for Credit Losses – The allowance for credit losses is a reserve established through a provision for credit losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of lifetime expected losses based on reasonable and supportable forecasts, historical loss experience, and other qualitative considerations. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for expected loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company’s allowance for credit loss methodology includes reserve factors calculated to estimate current expected credit losses to amortized cost balances over the remaining contractual life of the portfolio, adjusted for the effective interest rate used to discount prepayments, in accordance with ASC Topic 326-20, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. Accordingly, the methodology is based on the Company’s reasonable and supportable economic forecasts, historical loss experience, and other qualitative adjustments.

Loans with similar risk characteristics such as loan type, collateral type, and internal risk ratings are aggregated into homogeneous segments for assessment. Reserve factors are based on estimated probability of default and loss given default for each segment. The estimates are determined based on economic forecasts over the reasonable and supportable forecast period based on projected performance of economic variables that have a statistical relationship with the historical loss experience of the segments. For contractual periods that extend beyond the one-year forecast period, the estimates revert to average historical loss experiences over a one-year period on a straight-line basis.

The Company also includes qualitative adjustments to the allowance based on factors and considerations that have not otherwise been fully accounted for. Qualitative adjustments include, but are not limited to:

Changes in asset quality - Adjustments related to trending credit quality metrics including delinquency, non-performing loans, charge-offs, and risk ratings that may not be fully accounted for in the reserve factor.
Changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio - Adjustments related to current changes in the loan portfolio that are not fully represented or accounted for in the reserve factors.
Changes in lending and loan monitoring policies and procedures - Adjustments related to current changes in lending and loan monitoring procedures as well as review of specific internal policy compliance metrics.
Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff - Adjustments to measure increasing or decreasing credit risk related to lending and loan monitoring management.
Changes in the value of underlying collateral of collateralized loans - Adjustments related to improving or deterioration of the value of underlying collateral that are not fully captured in the reserve factors.
Changes in and the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit - Adjustments related to credit risk of specific industries that are not fully captured in the reserve factors.
Changes in regional and local economic and business conditions and developments - Adjustments related to expected and current economic conditions at a regional or local-level that are not fully captured within the Company’s reasonable and supportable forecast.
Data imprecisions due to limited historical loss data - Adjustments related to limited historical loss data that is representative of the collective loan portfolio.

Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. These evaluations are typically performed on loans with a deteriorated internal risk rating or are classified as a troubled debt restructuring. The allowance for credit loss is determined based on several methods including estimating the fair value of the underlying collateral or the present value of expected cash flows.

For a collateral dependent loan, the Company’s evaluation process includes a valuation by appraisal or other collateral analysis adjusted for selling costs, when appropriate. This valuation is compared to the remaining outstanding principal balance of the loan. If a loss is determined to be probable, the loss is included in the allowance for credit losses as a specific allocation. If the loan is not collateral dependent, the measurement of loss is based on the difference between the expected and contractual future cash flows of the loan.


26




Loans for which the repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of collateral and where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty had an amortized cost of $74.8 million as of June 30, 2021, as further detailed in the table below. The collateral securing these loans consist of commercial real estate properties, residential properties, other business assets, and secured energy production assets.

(In thousands)Real Estate CollateralEnergyOther CollateralTotal
Construction and development$2,788 $— $— $2,788 
Single family residential2,940 — — 2,940 
Other commercial real estate34,431 — — 34,431 
Commercial— 30,677 3,979 34,656 
Total$40,159 $30,677 $3,979 $74,815 

The following table details activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories. 

(In thousands)CommercialReal
Estate
Credit
Card
Other
Consumer
and Other
Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
Beginning balance, April 1, 2021$34,633 $195,826 $2,172 $2,485 $235,116 
Provision for credit loss expense(6,678)(8,522)4,072 1,117 (10,011)
Charge-offs(309)(439)(1,046)(411)(2,205)
Recoveries2,147 1,523 244 425 4,339 
Net charge-offs1,838 1,084 (802)14 2,134 
Ending balance, June 30, 2021$29,793 $188,388 $5,442 $3,616 $227,239 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Beginning balance, January 1, 2021$42,093 $182,868 $7,472 $5,617 $238,050 
Provision for credit loss expense(13,599)5,720 (515)(1,617)(10,011)
Charge-offs(1,168)(2,126)(2,049)(1,113)(6,456)
Recoveries2,467 1,926 534 729 5,656 
Net charge-offs1,299 (200)(1,515)(384)(800)
Ending balance, June 30, 2021$29,793 $188,388 $5,442 $3,616 $227,239 

Activity in the allowance for credit losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 was as follows:

(In thousands)CommercialReal
Estate
Credit
Card
Other
Consumer
and Other
Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Beginning balance, April 1, 2020$76,327 $141,022 $7,817 $18,029 $243,195 
Provision for credit losses18,400 10,020 3,943 (5,685)26,678 
Charge-offs(35,687)(1,824)(1,053)(592)(39,156)
Recoveries98 253 272 303 926 
Net (charge-offs) recoveries(35,589)(1,571)(781)(289)(38,230)
Ending balance, June 30, 2020$59,138 $149,471 $10,979 $12,055 $231,643 
27




Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Beginning balance, January 1, 2020 - prior to adoption of CECL$22,863 $39,161 $4,051 $2,169 $68,244 
Impact of CECL adoption22,733 114,314 2,232 12,098 151,377 
Provision for credit loss expense49,307 (2,138)6,693 (987)52,875 
Charge-offs(36,210)(2,220)(2,494)(1,971)(42,895)
Recoveries445 354 497 746 2,042 
Net charge-offs(35,765)(1,866)(1,997)(1,225)(40,853)
Ending balance, June 30, 2020$59,138 $149,471 $10,979 $12,055 $231,643 

As of June 30, 2021, the Company’s allowance for credit losses was considered sufficient based upon expected loan level cash flows that were supported by economic forecasts. Provision expense was recaptured for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 based upon improved asset credit quality metrics combined with improved Moody’s economic modeling scenarios.

Four energy credits within the commercial segment were charged off during the second quarter of 2020 for a total of $32.6 million, of which $27.1 million was specifically reserved in the prior quarter. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2020, the change in the provision for credit losses was related to updated credit loss forecasts using multiple Moody’s economic scenarios. The updates were to reflect the possibility of a longer, more prolonged recovery to the economies that affect the loan portfolio.

Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
 
In addition to the allowance for credit losses, the Company has established a reserve for unfunded commitments, classified in other liabilities. This reserve is maintained at a level management believes to be sufficient to absorb losses arising from unfunded loan commitments. The reserve for unfunded commitments as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $22.4 million. The adequacy of the reserve for unfunded commitments is determined quarterly based on methodology similar to the methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses. No adjustment was made to the reserve for unfunded commitments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 as it was considered sufficient to cover any loss expectations. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020, net adjustments to the reserve for unfunded commitments resulted in a benefit of $5.0 million and $8.0 million, respectively, and was included in the provision for credit losses in the statement of income.

Provision for Credit Losses

Provision for credit losses is determined by the Company as the amount to be added to the allowance for credit loss accounts for various types of financial instruments including loans, securities and off-balance-sheet credit exposure after net charge-offs have been deducted to bring the allowance to a level which, in management’s best estimate, is necessary to absorb expected credit losses over the lives of the respective financial instruments.

The components of the provision for credit losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)2021202020212020
Provision for credit losses related to:  
Loans$(10,011)$26,678 $(10,011)$52,875 
Unfunded commitments— (5,001)— (8,000)
Securities - HTM(486)(102)(1,183)(62)
Securities - AFS(2,454)340 (312)236 
Total$(12,951)$21,915 $(11,506)$45,049 

28




NOTE 6: RIGHT-OF-USE LEASE ASSETS AND LEASE LIABILITIES

The Company accounts for its leases in accordance with ASC Topic 842, Leases, which requires recognition of most leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on the balance sheet. At lease commencement, the lease contract is reviewed to determine whether the contract is a finance lease or an operating lease; a lease liability is recognized on a discounted basis, related to the Company’s obligation to make lease payments; and a right-of-use asset is also recognized related to the Company’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company accounts for lease and non-lease components (such as taxes, insurance and common area maintenance costs) separately as such amounts are generally readily determinable under the lease contracts. Lease payments over the expected term are discounted using the Company’s Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advance rates for borrowings of similar term. If it is reasonably certain that a renewal or termination option will be exercised, the effects of such options are included in the determination of the expected lease term. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet; the Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company’s leases are classified as operating leases with a term, including expected renewal or termination options, greater than one year, and are related to certain office facilities and office equipment. The following table presents information as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 related to the Company’s right-of-use lease assets, included in premises and equipment, and lease liabilities, included in accrued interest and other liabilities.

June 30,December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20212020
Right-of-use lease assets$34,748 $31,348 
Lease liabilities35,072 31,433 
Weighted average remaining lease term8.30 years6.55 years
Weighted average discount rate2.79 %3.09 %

Operating lease cost for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 was $2.9 million and $5.7 million, respectively, as compared to $3.4 million and $6.6 million for the same periods in 2020.

NOTE 7: PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Total premises and equipment, net at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 were as follows:

June 30,December 31,
(In thousands)20212020
Right-of-use lease assets$34,748 $31,348 
Premises and equipment:
Land89,950 90,953 
Buildings and improvements289,934 293,338 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment101,962 100,863 
Software65,675 64,877 
Construction in progress3,698 763 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(156,380)(140,450)
Total premises and equipment, net$429,587 $441,692 

29




NOTE 8: GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
Goodwill is tested annually, or more often than annually, if circumstances warrant, for impairment. If the implied fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill impairment is indicated, and goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not recognized in the financial statements. Goodwill totaled $1.1 billion at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

Goodwill impairment was neither indicated nor recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2021 or the year ended December 31, 2020. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company’s share price began to decline as the markets in the United States responded to the global COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of that economic decline, the effect on share price and other factors, the Company performed an interim goodwill impairment assessment during each quarter of 2020 and concluded no impairment existed during each period. While the goodwill impairment analyses indicated no impairment during 2020, the Company’s assessment depended on several assumptions which were dependent on market and economic conditions, and future changes in those conditions could impact the Company’s assessment in the future. Due to the improved market and economic conditions, and the related effects on the Company’s share price, the Company did not perform an interim goodwill impairment assessment during the first quarter of 2021. During the second quarter of 2021, the Company performed an annual goodwill impairment analysis and concluded no impairment existed.
 
Core deposit premiums represent the value of the relationships that acquired banks had with their deposit customers and are amortized over periods ranging from 10 years to 15 years and are periodically evaluated, at least annually, as to the recoverability of their carrying value. Other intangible assets represent the value of other acquired relationships, including relationships with trust and wealth management customers, and are being amortized over various periods ranging from 10 years to 15 years.
 
Changes in the carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s core deposit premiums and other intangible assets at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 were as follows: 
 
June 30,December 31,
(In thousands)20212020
Core deposit premiums:
Balance, beginning of year$97,363 $111,808 
Disposition of intangible asset(1)
(674)(2,324)
Amortization(5,990)(12,121)
Balance, end of period90,699 97,363 
Books of business and other intangibles:
Balance, beginning of year13,747 15,532 
Disposition of intangible asset— (413)
Amortization(687)(1,372)
Balance, end of period13,060 13,747 
Total other intangible assets, net$103,759 $111,110 
_________________________
(1)    Adjustments recorded for the premiums on certain deposit liabilities associated with the sale of banking operations.


30




The carrying basis and accumulated amortization of the Company’s other intangible assets at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 were as follows: 

June 30,December 31,
(In thousands)20212020
Core deposit premiums:
Gross carrying amount$144,202 $146,355 
Accumulated amortization(53,503)(48,992)
Core deposit premiums, net90,699 97,363 
Books of business and other intangibles:
Gross carrying amount19,937 19,937 
Accumulated amortization(6,877)(6,190)
Books of business and other intangibles, net13,060 13,747 
Total other intangible assets, net$103,759 $111,110 

The Company’s estimated remaining amortization expense on other intangible assets as of June 30, 2021 is as follows:
 
(In thousands)YearAmortization
Expense
 Remainder of 2021$6,663 
 202213,275 
 202312,992 
 202412,090 
 20259,505 
 Thereafter49,234 
 Total$103,759 

NOTE 9: TIME DEPOSITS
 
Time deposits included approximately $2.10 billion and $2.03 billion of certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more, at June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively. Of this total approximately $1.00 billion and $889.8 million of certificates of deposit were over $250,000 at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
 
NOTE 10: INCOME TAXES
 
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following components for the periods indicated below:
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)2021202020212020
Income taxes currently payable$13,930 $9,391 $25,066 $31,671 
Deferred income taxes3,088 6,202 6,315 4,616 
Provision for income taxes$17,018 $15,593 $31,381 $36,287 
 

31




The tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts that give rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and their approximate tax effects, are as follows: 

June 30,December 31,
(In thousands)20212020
Deferred tax assets:  
Loans acquired$7,084 $10,100 
Allowance for credit losses55,064 58,028 
Valuation of foreclosed assets1,673 1,673 
Tax NOLs from acquisition14,720 16,028 
Deferred compensation payable3,267 3,060 
Accrued equity and other compensation5,081 5,905 
Acquired securities491 587 
Right-of-use lease liability8,742 7,835 
Allowance for unfunded commitments5,583 5,583 
Other7,578 7,600 
Gross deferred tax assets109,283 116,399 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Goodwill and other intangible amortization(37,914)(38,882)
Accumulated depreciation(33,670)(34,667)
Right-of-use lease asset(8,661)(7,813)
Unrealized gain on AFS securities(2,058)(17,521)
Other(4,335)(4,021)
Gross deferred tax liabilities(86,638)(102,904)
Net deferred tax asset$22,645 $13,495 

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s actual income tax expense is shown for the periods indicated below:
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)2021202020212020
Computed at the statutory rate (21%)$19,305 $15,620 $36,477 $36,180 
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit1,488 2,296 3,378 4,359 
Stock-based compensation(66)43 37 69 
Tax exempt interest income(2,741)(1,421)(5,251)(2,842)
Tax exempt earnings on BOLI(319)(212)(560)(531)
Federal tax credits(589)(1,034)(1,179)(2,068)
Other differences, net(60)301 (1,521)1,120 
Actual tax provision$17,018 $15,593 $31,381 $36,287 


32




The Company follows ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, which prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions should be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on the accounting for and disclosure of unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties. The Company has no history of expiring net operating loss carryforwards and is projecting significant pre-tax and financial taxable income in future years. The Company expects to fully realize its deferred tax assets in the future.

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statutes of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes an annual limit on the ability of a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” to use its U.S. net operating losses to reduce its tax liability. The Company has engaged in two tax-free reorganization transactions in which acquired net operating losses are limited pursuant to Section 382. In total, approximately $65.2 million of federal net operating losses subject to the IRC Section 382 annual limitation are expected to be utilized by the Company. All of the acquired net operating loss carryforwards are expected to be fully utilized by 2036.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction. The Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns are open and subject to examinations from the 2017 tax year and forward. The Company’s various state income tax returns are generally open from the 2017 and later tax return years based on individual state statute of limitations.

NOTE 11: SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
 
The Company utilizes securities sold under agreements to repurchase to facilitate the needs of its customers and to facilitate secured short-term funding needs. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The Company monitors collateral levels on a continuous basis. The Company may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with the Company’s safekeeping agents.
 
The gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements was $172.2 million and $248.9 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The remaining contractual maturity of the securities sold under agreements to repurchase in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 is presented in the following tables.
 
 Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(In thousands)Overnight and
Continuous
Up to 30 Days30-90 DaysGreater than
90 Days
Total
June 30, 2021     
Repurchase agreements:
U.S. Government agencies$172,215 $— $— $— $172,215 
December 31, 2020
Repurchase agreements:
U.S. Government agencies$248,861 $— $— $— $248,861 

33




NOTE 12: OTHER BORROWINGS AND SUBORDINATED NOTES AND DEBENTURES
 
Debt at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 consisted of the following components: 

June 30,December 31,
(In thousands)20212020
Other Borrowings  
FHLB advances, net of discount, due 2022 to 2035, 0.23% to 7.37% secured by real estate loans
$1,306,576 $1,308,674 
Other long-term debt
32,617 33,393 
Total other borrowings1,339,193 1,342,067 
Subordinated Notes and Debentures
Subordinated notes payable, due 4/1/2028, fixed-to-floating rate (fixed rate of 5.00% through 3/31/2023, floating rate of 2.15% above the three month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly)
330,000 330,000 
Trust preferred securities, due 9/15/2037, floating rate of 1.37% above the three month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly
10,310 10,310 
Trust preferred securities, due 6/6/2037, floating rate of 1.57% above the three month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, callable without penalty
10,310 10,310 
Trust preferred securities, due 12/15/2035, floating rate of 1.45% above the three month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, callable without penalty
6,702 6,702 
Trust preferred securities, net of discount, due 6/15/2037, floating rate of 1.85% above the three month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, callable without penalty
25,250 25,172 
Trust preferred securities, net of discount, due 12/15/2036, floating rate of 1.85% above the three month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, callable without penalty
3,032 3,023 
Unamortized debt issuance costs(2,461)(2,643)
Total subordinated notes and debentures383,143 382,874 
Total other borrowings and subordinated debt$1,722,336 $1,724,941 

In March 2018, the Company issued $330.0 million in aggregate principal amount, of 5.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes (“Notes”) at a public offering price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes. The Company incurred $3.6 million in debt issuance costs related to the offering during March 2018. The Notes will mature on April 1, 2028 and will bear interest at an initial fixed rate of 5.00% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears. From and including April 1, 2023 to, but excluding, the maturity date or the date of earlier redemption, the interest rate will reset quarterly to an annual interest rate equal to the then-current three month LIBOR rate plus 215 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. The Notes will be subordinated in right of payment to the payment of the Company’s other existing and future senior indebtedness, including all of its general creditors. The Notes are obligations of the Company only and are not obligations of, and are not guaranteed by, any of its subsidiaries. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the sale of the Notes to repay certain outstanding indebtedness. The Notes qualify for Tier 2 capital treatment.

The Company had total FHLB advances of $1.31 billion at June 30, 2021, of which $1.30 billion are FHLB Owns the Option (“FOTO”) advances. FOTO advances are a low cost, fixed-rate source of funding in return for granting to FHLB the flexibility to choose a termination date earlier than the maturity date. Typically, FOTO exercise dates follow a specified lockout period at the beginning of the term when FHLB cannot terminate the FOTO advance. If FHLB exercises its option to terminate the FOTO advance at one of the specified option exercise dates, there is no termination or prepayment fee, and replacement funding will be available at then-prevailing market rates, subject to FHLB’s credit and collateral requirements. The Company’s FOTO advances outstanding at June 30, 2021 have original maturity dates of ten years to fifteen years with lockout periods that have expired. The Company expects the FHLB’s option to terminate the FOTO advances prior to stated maturity dates will not be exercised due to the current low interest rate environment. The possibility of the FHLB exercising the options is continually analyzed by the Company along with the market expected rate outcome. At June 30, 2021, the FHLB advances outstanding were secured by mortgage loans and investment securities totaling approximately $4.9 billion and the Company had approximately $3.5 billion of additional advances available from the FHLB.


34




The trust preferred securities are tax-advantaged issues that qualify for inclusion as Tier 2 capital at June 30, 2021. Distributions on these securities are included in interest expense on long-term debt. Each of the trusts is a statutory business trust organized for the sole purpose of issuing trust securities and investing the proceeds thereof in junior subordinated debentures of the Company, the sole asset of each trust. The preferred securities of each trust represent preferred beneficial interests in the assets of the respective trusts and are subject to mandatory redemption upon payment of the junior subordinated debentures held by the trust. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned by the Company. Each trust’s ability to pay amounts due on the trust preferred securities is solely dependent upon the Company making payments on the related junior subordinated debentures. The Company’s obligations under the junior subordinated securities and other relevant trust agreements, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of each respective trust’s obligations under the trust securities issued by each respective trust.

The Company’s long-term debt primarily includes subordinated debt and long-term FHLB advances with an original maturity of greater than one year. Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt at June 30, 2021, are as follows: 
Year(In thousands)
Remainder of 2021$923 
20221,727 
20231,686 
20242,327 
20254,876 
Thereafter1,710,797 
Total$1,722,336 

NOTE 13: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
 
In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business, including proceedings based on breach of contract claims, lender liability claims, and other ordinary-course claims, some of which seek substantial relief or damages.

On May 22, 2019, Danny Walkingstick and Whitnye Fort filed a putative class action complaint against Simmons Bank in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The operative complaint alleges that Simmons Bank improperly charges overdraft fees on transactions that did not actually overdraw customers’ accounts by utilizing the checking account’s “available balance” to assess overdraft fees instead of the “ledger balance.” Plaintiffs’ claims include breach of contract and unjust enrichment, and they seek to represent a proposed class of all Simmons Bank checking account customers who were assessed an overdraft fee on a transaction that purportedly did not overdraw the account. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, and other relief as the Court deems proper for themselves and the putative class. Simmons Bank denies the allegations but has reached a settlement in principle with the plaintiffs to resolve this matter, subject to the preparation and execution of a mutually acceptable settlement agreement and release, as well as the court’s approval. The settlement is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

On January 14, 2020, Susanne Pace filed a putative class action complaint against Landmark Bank, formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Landrum Company, to which Simmons Bank is a successor by merger in connection with the Company’s acquisition of The Landrum Company which closed in October 2019 in the Circuit Court of Boone County, Missouri. The complaint alleges that Landmark Bank improperly charged overdraft fees where a transaction was initially authorized on sufficient funds but later settled negative due to intervening transactions. The complaint asserts a claim for breach of contract, which incorporates the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiff seeks to represent a proposed class of all Landmark Bank checking account customers from Missouri who were allegedly charged overdraft fees on transactions that did not overdraw their checking account. Plaintiff seeks unspecified actual, statutory, and punitive damages as well as costs, attorneys’ fees, prejudgment interest, an injunction, and other relief as the Court deems proper for herself and the putative class. Simmons Bank denies the allegations and is vigorously defending the matter.


35




On June 29, 2020, Shunda Wilkins, Diann Graham, and David Watson filed a putative class action complaint against Simmons Bank in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The complaint alleges that Simmons Bank improperly charges multiple insufficient funds or overdraft fees when a merchant resubmits a rejected payment request. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs seek to represent a proposed class of all Simmons Bank checking account customers who were charged multiple insufficient funds or overdraft fees on resubmitted payment requests. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, costs, attorney’s fees, pre-judgment interest, an injunction, and other relief as the Court deems proper for themselves and the purported class. Simmons Bank denies the allegations and is vigorously defending the matter.

On May 13, 2021, Susanne Pace filed a second putative class action complaint against Landmark Bank, to which Simmons Bank is a successor by merger, in the circuit court of Boone County, Missouri, which has been removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Central Division. The complaint alleges that Landmark Bank improperly charged multiple insufficient funds or overdraft fees when a merchant or other originator resubmits a rejected payment request. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract, including breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiff seeks to represent a proposed class of all Landmark Bank checking account customers who were charged multiple insufficient funds or overdraft fees on resubmitted payment requests. Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages, costs, attorney’s fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, an injunction, and other relief as the Court deems proper for herself and the purported class. Simmons Bank denies the allegations and is vigorously defending the matter.

We establish reserves for legal proceedings when potential losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated. While the ultimate resolution (including amounts thereof) of any legal proceedings, including the matters described above, cannot be determined at this time, based on information presently available and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes that the ultimate outcome in such proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. It is possible, however, that future developments could result in an unfavorable outcome for or resolution of any of these proceedings, which may be material to our results of operations for a given fiscal period.
 
NOTE 14: CAPITAL STOCK
 
On February 27, 2009, at a special meeting, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to establish 40,040,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value. The aggregate liquidation preference of all shares of preferred stock cannot exceed $80,000,000.

On October 29, 2019, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (“October Amended Articles”) with the Arkansas Secretary of State. The October Amended Articles classified and designated Series D Preferred Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share, out of the Company’s authorized preferred stock.

Effective July 23, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s current stock repurchase program (“Program”) that increases the amount of the Company’s common stock that may be repurchased under the Program from a maximum of $180 million to a maximum of $276.5 million and extends the term of the Program from October 31, 2021, to October 31, 2022 (unless terminated sooner). The Program was originally approved on October 17, 2019 and first amended in March 2020; and as of June 30, 2021, the Company has repurchased approximately $126.5 million of its common stock under the Program.

Under the Program, the Company may repurchase shares of its common stock through open market and privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The timing, pricing, and amount of any repurchases under the Program will be determined by the Company’s management at its discretion based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, trading volume and market price of the Company’s common stock, corporate considerations, the Company’s working capital and investment requirements, general market and economic conditions, and legal requirements. The Program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any common stock and may be modified, discontinued, or suspended at any time without prior notice. The Company anticipates funding for this Program to come from available sources of liquidity, including cash on hand and future cash flow.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2021, the Company repurchased 130,916 shares at an average price of $23.53 per share under the Program. No shares were repurchased during the second quarter of 2021 under the Program. Market conditions and the Company’s capital needs will drive decisions regarding additional, future stock repurchases. The Company repurchased 4,922,336 shares at an average price of $18.96 per share under the Program during the six months ended June 30, 2020.
 
36




NOTE 15: UNDIVIDED PROFITS
 
Simmons Bank, the Company’s subsidiary bank, is subject to legal limitations on dividends that can be paid to the parent company without prior approval of the applicable regulatory agencies. The approval of the Commissioner of the Arkansas State Bank Department is required if the total of all dividends declared by an Arkansas state bank in any calendar year exceeds seventy-five percent (75%) of the total of its net profits, as defined, for that year combined with seventy-five percent (75%) of its retained net profits of the preceding year. At June 30, 2021, Simmons Bank had approximately $99.3 million available for payment of dividends to the Company, without prior regulatory approval.
 
The risk-based capital guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board and the Arkansas State Bank Department include the definitions for (1) a well-capitalized institution, (2) an adequately-capitalized institution, and (3) an undercapitalized institution. The criteria for a well-capitalized institution are: a 5% “Tier l leverage capital” ratio, an 8% “Tier 1 risk-based capital” ratio, 10% “total risk-based capital” ratio; and a 6.5% “common equity Tier 1 (CET1)” ratio.
 
The Company and Simmons Bank, must hold a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% composed of CET1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements. Failure to meet this capital conservation buffer would result in additional limits on dividends, other distributions and discretionary bonuses. As of June 30, 2021, the Company and Simmons Bank met all capital adequacy requirements, including the capital conservation buffer, under the Basel III Capital Rules. The Company’s CET1 ratio was 14.20% at June 30, 2021. 

NOTE 16: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
 
The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted various stock-based compensation plans. The plans provide for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance stock units. Pursuant to the plans, shares are reserved for future issuance by the Company upon exercise of stock options or awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, or performance stock units granted to directors, officers and other key employees.

The table below summarizes the transactions under the Company’s active stock-based compensation plans for the six months ended June 30, 2021: 

 Stock Options
Outstanding
Non-vested Stock Awards OutstandingNon-vested Stock Units Outstanding
 (Shares in thousands)Number
of Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Number
of Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Number
of Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Beginning balance, January 1, 2021658 $22.48 $22.35 1,032 $24.53 
Granted— — — — 474 29.18 
Stock options exercised(183)22.50 — — — — 
Stock awards/units vested (earned)— — (3)22.48 (302)25.77 
Forfeited/expired— — — — (60)26.02 
Balance, June 30, 2021475 $22.47 $22.20 1,144 $26.02 
Exercisable, June 30, 2021475 $22.47 


37




The following table summarizes information about stock options under the plans outstanding at June 30, 2021:
 
  Options OutstandingOptions Exercisable
Range of Exercise PricesNumber
of Shares
(In thousands)
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Number
of Shares
(In thousands)
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$9.46 $9.46 10.55$9.461$9.46
10.65 10.65 31.5810.65310.65
20.29 20.29 473.5020.294720.29
20.36 20.36 13.3820.36120.36
22.20 22.20 513.7322.205122.20
22.75 22.75 2934.1122.7529322.75
23.51 23.51 724.5623.517223.51
24.07 24.07 74.2124.07724.07
$9.46 $24.07 4754.05$22.47475$22.47

The table below summarizes the Company’s performance stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2021:

(In thousands)Performance Stock Units
Non-vested, January 1, 2021222 
Granted96 
Vested (earned)(57)
Forfeited(5)
Non-vested, June 30, 2021256 

Stock-based compensation expense was $7.6 million for both of the six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period for all stock-based awards. There was no unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options at June 30, 2021. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock awards and stock units was $19.6 million at June 30, 2021. At such date, the weighted-average period over which this unrecognized expense is expected to be recognized was 1.9 years.
 
The intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable at June 30, 2021 was $3.3 million. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was $29.34 as of June 30, 2021, and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, was $1.3 million and $6,000, respectively.

The fair value of the Company’s employee stock options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, changes to which can materially affect the fair value estimate. There were no stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.
 
38




NOTE 17: EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)
 
Basic EPS is computed by dividing reported net income available to common stockholders by weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing reported net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares and all potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.
 
The computation of earnings per share is as follows:

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)2021202020212020
Net income available to common stockholders$74,911 $58,789 $142,318 $136,012 
Average common shares outstanding108,362 108,982 108,286 110,936 
Average potential dilutive common shares460 148 460 148 
Average diluted common shares108,822 109,130 108,746 111,084 
Basic earnings per share$0.69 $0.54 $1.31 $1.23 
Diluted earnings per share$0.69 $0.54 $1.31 $1.22 

There were no stock options excluded from the earnings per share calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 due to the average market price exceeding the related stock option exercise price. There were approximately 653,718 stock options excluded from the earnings per share calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 due to the related stock option exercise price exceeding the average market price.

NOTE 18: ADDITIONAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
 
The following is a summary of the Company’s additional cash flow information:
 
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)20212020
Interest paid$44,281 $72,146 
Income taxes (refunded) paid(32,980)3,196 
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets held for sale3,289 1,147 
Transfers of premises to foreclosed assets and other real estate owned
— 3,120 
Transfers of premises held for sale to other real estate owned4,368 — 
Transfers of loans to other assets held for sale
— 114,925 
Transfers of deposits to other liabilities held for sale
— 58,405 
 
39




NOTE 19: OTHER INCOME AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
 
Other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 was $8.1 million and $18.4 million, respectively. Other income for the same periods in 2020 was $9.8 million and $22.6 million, respectively. During the six month periods in 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized gains on sale of $5.9 million and $8.1 million, respectively, related to the sale of banking operations and bank branches.

Other operating expenses consisted of the following:
 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)2021202020212020
Professional services$4,561 $3,921 $9,808 $9,750 
Postage1,943 1,769 4,313 4,005 
Telephone1,610 2,450 3,242 4,635 
Credit card expense (1)
3,339 3,161 6,461 6,194 
Marketing4,740 3,528 7,893 7,913 
Software and technology9,857 10,024 20,108 19,469 
Operating supplies838 828 1,408 1,764 
Amortization of intangibles3,332 3,369 6,676 6,782 
Branch right sizing expense468 1,721 1,093 1,959 
Other expense7,319 7,459 13,859 16,198 
Total other operating expenses$38,007 $38,230 $74,861 $78,669 
_________________________
(1)    During the second quarter of 2021, certain debit and credit card transaction fees were reclassified from non-interest expense to non-interest income. Prior periods have been adjusted to reflect this reclassification.
 
NOTE 20: CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
 
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries have made loans, other extensions of credit, and vendor contracts to directors, officers, their associates and members of their immediate families. Additionally, some directors, officers and their associates and members of their immediate families have placed deposits with the Company’s subsidiary bank, Simmons Bank. Such loans and other extensions of credit, deposits and vendor contracts (which were not material) were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms (including interest rates and collateral) as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons or through a competitive bid process. Further, in management’s opinion, these extensions of credit did not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
 
NOTE 21: COMMITMENTS AND CREDIT RISK
 
The Company grants agribusiness, commercial and residential loans to customers primarily throughout Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas, along with credit card loans to customers throughout the United States. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since a portion of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial real estate and residential real estate.
 
At June 30, 2021, the Company had outstanding commitments to extend credit aggregating approximately $682.8 million and $2.45 billion for credit card commitments and other loan commitments, respectively. At December 31, 2020, the Company had outstanding commitments to extend credit aggregating approximately $671.5 million and $2.36 billion for credit card commitments and other loan commitments, respectively.

As of June 30, 2021, the Company had outstanding commitments to originate fixed rate-rate mortgage loans of approximately $122.0 million. At December 31, 2020, the Company had outstanding commitments to originate fixed-rate mortgage loans of approximately $214.0 million. 
40




Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Company had total outstanding letters of credit amounting to $41.9 million and $49.0 million at June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively, with terms ranging from 9 months to 15 years. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had no deferred revenue under standby letter of credit agreements.

The Company has purchased letters of credit from the FHLB as security for certain public deposits. The amount of the letters of credit was $97.6 million and $1.5 billion at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, and they expire in less than one year from issuance.

NOTE 22: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
 
ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Topic 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: 

Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the Company’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Furthermore, the reported fair value amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the presentation dates, and therefore, estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein. A more detailed description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.

Following is a description of the inputs and valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
 
Available-for-sale securities – Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities. Other securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things. In order to ensure the fair values are consistent with ASC Topic 820, the Company periodically checks the fair values by comparing them to another pricing source, such as Bloomberg. The availability of pricing confirms Level 2 classification in the fair value hierarchy. The third-party pricing service is subject to an annual review of internal controls. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. The Company’s investment in U.S. Treasury securities, if any, is reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. The remainder of the Company’s available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs.
41




Mortgage loans held for sale – Mortgage loans held for sale are reported at fair value on an aggregate basis. Adjustments to fair value are recognized monthly and reflected in earnings. In determining the fair value of loans held for sale, the Company may consider outstanding investor commitments, discounted cash flow analyses with market assumptions or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Such loans are classified within either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Where assumptions are made using significant unobservable inputs, such loans held for sale are classified as Level 3. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the aggregate fair value of mortgage loans held for sale exceeded their cost.
 
Derivative instruments – The Company’s derivative instruments are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The Company obtains fair value measurements from dealer quotes.

Other liabilities held for sale – The Company’s other liabilities held for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 3 inputs. See Note 4, Other Liabilities Held for Sale.

The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets by level within the fair value hierarchy that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
 
  Fair Value Measurements Using
(In thousands)Fair ValueQuoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
June 30, 2021    
Available-for-sale securities    
U.S. Treasury$600 $600 $— $— 
U.S. Government agencies554,937 — 554,937 — 
Mortgage-backed securities3,987,209 — 3,987,209 — 
State and political subdivisions1,557,497 — 1,557,497 — 
Other securities456,338 — 456,338 — 
Mortgage loans held for sale36,011 — — 36,011 
Derivative asset20,475 — 20,475 — 
Derivative liability(20,659)— (20,659)— 
December 31, 2020
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Government agencies$477,237 $— $477,237 $— 
Mortgage-backed securities1,394,936 — 1,394,936 — 
States and political subdivisions1,470,723 — 1,470,723 — 
Other securities130,702 — 130,702 — 
Mortgage loans held for sale137,378 — — 137,378 
Derivative asset35,846 — 35,846 — 
Other liabilities held for sale(154,620)— — (154,620)
Derivative liability(36,141)— (36,141)— 


42




Certain financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances. Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include the following:

Individually assessed loans (collateral-dependent) – When the Company has a specific expectation to initiate, or has initiated, foreclosure proceedings, and when the repayment of a loan is expected to be substantially dependent on the liquidation of underlying collateral, the relationship is deemed collateral-dependent. Fair value of the loan is determined by establishing an allowance for credit loss for any exposure based on the valuation of the underlying collateral. The valuation of the collateral is determined by either an independent third-party appraisal or other collateral analysis. Discounts can be made by the Company based upon the overall evaluation of the independent appraisal. Collateral-dependent loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Collateral values supporting the individually assessed loans are evaluated quarterly for updates to appraised values or adjustments due to non-current valuations.

Foreclosed assets and other real estate owned – Foreclosed assets and other real estate owned are reported at fair value, less estimated costs to sell. At foreclosure, if the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, of the real estate acquired is less than the Company’s recorded investment in the related loan, a write-down is recognized through a charge to the allowance for credit losses. Additionally, valuations are periodically performed by management and any subsequent reduction in value is recognized by a charge to income. The fair value of foreclosed assets and other real estate owned is estimated using Level 3 inputs based on unobservable market data.

The significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) used in the fair value measurement of collateral for collateral-dependent loans and foreclosed assets primarily relate to the specialized discounting criteria applied to the borrower’s reported amount of collateral. The amount of the collateral discount depends upon the condition and marketability of the collateral, as well as other factors which may affect the collectability of the loan. Management’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset. It is reasonably possible that a change in the estimated fair value for instruments measured using Level 3 inputs could occur in the future. As the Company’s primary objective in the event of default would be to liquidate the collateral to settle the outstanding balance of the loan, collateral that is less marketable would receive a larger discount.
 
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets by level within the fair value hierarchy that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. 

  Fair Value Measurements Using
(In thousands)Fair ValueQuoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
June 30, 2021    
Individually assessed loans (1) (2) (collateral-dependent)
$31,232 $— $— $31,232 
Foreclosed assets and other real estate owned (1)
1,889 — — 1,889 
December 31, 2020
Individually assessed loans (1) (2) (collateral-dependent)
$66,209 $— $— $66,209 
Foreclosed assets and other real estate owned (1)
17,074 — — 17,074 
________________________
(1)These amounts represent the resulting carrying amounts on the consolidated balance sheets for collateral-dependent loans and foreclosed assets and other real estate owned for which fair value re-measurements took place during the period.
(2)Identified reserves of $8,340,000 and $13,725,000 were related to collateral-dependent loans for which fair value re-measurements took place during the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.


43




ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure in annual and interim financial statements of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments not previously disclosed.

Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amount for cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value (Level 1).

Interest bearing balances due from banks – The fair value of interest bearing balances due from banks – time is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the rates currently offered on deposits of similar remaining maturities (Level 2).
 
Held-to-maturity securities – Fair values for held-to-maturity securities equal quoted market prices, if available, such as for highly liquid government bonds (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on quoted market prices of similar securities. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things (Level 2). In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Loans – The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows, using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. Additional factors considered include the type of loan and related collateral, variable or fixed rate, classification status, remaining term, interest rate, historical delinquencies, loan to value ratios, current market rates and remaining loan balance. The loans were grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The discount rates used for loans were based on current market rates for new originations of similar loans. Estimated credit losses were also factored into the projected cash flows of the loans. The fair value of loans is estimated on an exit price basis incorporating the above factors (Level 3).
 
Deposits – The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amount) (Level 2). The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities (Level 3).
 
Federal Funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase and short-term debt – The carrying amount for Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase and short-term debt are a reasonable estimate of fair value (Level 2).
 
Other borrowings – For short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. For long-term debt, rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value (Level 2).
 
Subordinated debentures – The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated using the rates that would be charged for subordinated debentures of similar remaining maturities (Level 2).
 
Accrued interest receivable/payable – The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximated fair value (Level 2).
 
Commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and lines of credit – The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.
 
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.


44




The estimated fair values, and related carrying amounts, of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
 
 CarryingFair Value Measurements
(In thousands)AmountLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
June 30, 2021     
Financial assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents
$2,339,124 $2,339,124 $— $— $2,339,124 
Interest bearing balances due from banks - time
1,335 — 1,335 — 1,335 
Held-to-maturity securities
931,352 — 935,596 — 935,596 
Interest receivable
67,916 — 67,916 — 67,916 
Loans, net
11,159,113 — — 11,270,332 11,270,332 
Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing transaction accounts
4,893,959 — 4,893,959 — 4,893,959 
Interest bearing transaction accounts and savings deposits
10,569,602 — 10,569,602 — 10,569,602 
Time deposits
2,841,052 — — 2,849,515 2,849,515 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
187,215 — 187,215 — 187,215 
Other borrowings
1,339,193 — 1,417,544 — 1,417,544 
Subordinated notes and debentures
383,143 — 397,691 — 397,691 
Interest payable
7,795 — 7,795 — 7,795 
December 31, 2020
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$3,472,152 $3,472,152 $— $— $3,472,152 
Interest bearing balances due from banks - time
1,579 — 1,579 — 1,579 
Held-to-maturity securities
333,031 — 341,925 — 341,925 
Interest receivable
72,597 — 72,597 — 72,597 
Loans, net
12,662,847 — — 12,736,991 12,736,991 
Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing transaction accounts
4,482,091 — 4,482,091 — 4,482,091 
Interest bearing transaction accounts and savings deposits
9,672,608 — 9,672,608 — 9,672,608 
Time deposits
2,832,327 — — 2,848,621 2,848,621 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
299,111 — 299,111 — 299,111 
Other borrowings
1,342,067 — 1,448,625 — 1,448,625 
Subordinated notes and debentures382,874 — 398,827 — 398,827 
Interest payable
8,887 — 8,887 — 8,887 

The fair value of commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and lines of credit is not presented since management believes the fair value to be insignificant.

NOTE 23: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The Company utilizes derivative instruments to manage exposure to various types of interest rate risk for itself and its customers within policy guidelines. Transactions should only be entered into with an associated underlying exposure. All derivative instruments are carried at fair value.

45




Derivative contracts involve the risk of dealing with institutional derivative counterparties and their ability to meet contractual terms. Institutional counterparties must have an investment grade credit rating and be approved by the Company’s asset/liability management committee. In arranging these products for its customers, the Company assumes additional credit risk from the customer and from the dealer counterparty with whom the transaction is undertaken. Credit risk exists due to the default credit risk created in the exchange of the payments over a period of time. Credit exposure on interest rate swaps is limited to the net favorable value and interest payments of all swaps with each counterparty. Access to collateral in the event of default is reasonably assured. Therefore, credit exposure may be reduced by the amount of collateral pledged by the counterparty.

Hedge Structures

The Company will seek to enter derivative structures that most effectively address the risk exposure and structural terms of the underlying position being hedged. The term and notional principal amount of a hedge transaction will not exceed the term or principal amount of the underlying exposure. In addition, the Company will use hedge indices which are the same as, or highly correlated to, the index or rate on the underlying exposure. Derivative credit exposure is monitored on an ongoing basis for each customer transaction and aggregate exposure to each counterparty is tracked. The Company has set a maximum outstanding notional contract amount at 10% of the Company’s assets.

Customer Risk Management Interest Rate Swaps

The Company’s qualified loan customers have the opportunity to participate in its interest rate swap program for the purpose of managing interest rate risk on their variable rate loans with the Company. The Company enters into such agreements with customers, then offsetting agreements are executed between the Company and an approved dealer counterparty to minimize market risk from changes in interest rates. The counterparty contracts are identical to customer contracts in terms of notional amounts, interest rates, and maturity dates, except for a fixed pricing spread or fee paid to the Company by the dealer counterparty. These interest rate swaps carry varying degrees of credit, interest rate and market or liquidity risks. The fair value of these derivative instruments is recognized as either derivative assets or liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company has a limited number of swaps that are standalone without a similar agreement with the loan customer.

The following table summarizes the fair values of loan derivative contracts recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
(In thousands)NotionalFair ValueNotionalFair Value
Derivative assets$343,900 $20,475 $408,881 $35,846 
Derivative liabilities347,630 20,659 417,941 36,141 

Risk Participation Agreements

The Company has a limited number of Risk Participation Agreement swaps, that are associated with loan participations, where the Company is not the counterparty to the interest rate swaps that are associated with the risk participation sold. The interest rate swap mark to market only impacts the Company if the swap is in a liability position to the counterparty and the customer defaults on payments to the counterparty. The notional amount of these contingent agreements is $31.8 million as of June 30, 2021.

Energy Hedging

The Company provides energy derivative services to qualifying, high quality oil and gas borrowers for hedging purposes. The Company serves as an intermediary on energy derivative products between the Company’s borrowers and dealers. The Company will only enter into back-to-back trades, thus maintaining a balanced book between the dealer and the borrower.

Energy hedging risk exposure to the Company’s customer increases as energy prices for crude oil and natural gas rise. As prices decrease, exposure to the exchange increases. These risks are mitigated by customer credit underwriting policies and establishing a predetermined hedge line for each borrower and by monitoring the exchange margin.

The outstanding notional value as of June 30, 2021 for energy hedging Customer Sell to Company swaps were $18.1 million and the corresponding Company Sell to Dealer swaps were $18.1 million and the corresponding net fair value of the derivative asset and derivative liability was $346,800.

46




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
To the Stockholders, Board of Directors and Audit Committee
Simmons First National Corporation
Pine Bluff, Arkansas
 
Results of Review of Interim Financial Statements
 
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Simmons First National Corporation and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of June 30, 2021, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss) and stockholders’ equity for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “interim financial information or statements”). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 25, 2021, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
 
Basis for Review Results
 
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



 


 /s/ BKD, LLP
 
Little Rock, Arkansas
August 6, 2021

47




Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

OVERVIEW

Our net income for the three months ended June 30, 2021 was $74.9 million, or $0.69 diluted earnings per share, increases of $16.1 million and $0.15, respectively, compared to the second quarter of 2020. Included in both second quarter 2021 and 2020 results were non-core items related to our acquisitions and branch right sizing initiatives. Also included in 2020 results were non-core items related to early retirement programs. Included in both period results are gains associated with the sale of branch operations. Excluding all non-core items, core earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2021 were $75.4 million, or $0.69 core diluted earnings per share, compared to $60.1 million, or $0.55 core diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2020.

Net income for the first six months of 2021 was $142.3 million, or $1.31 diluted earnings per share, compared to $136.0 million, or $1.22 diluted earnings per share, for the same period in 2020. Excluding the same non-core items referenced above, year-to-date core earnings were $139.4 million, an increase of $5.4 million compared to the same period in the prior year. Core diluted earnings per share for the first half of 2021 were $1.28 compared to $1.21 for the same period in 2020.

In June 2021, we announced the acquisitions of Landmark, based in Collierville, TN, and Triumph, based in Memphis, TN. Completion of the Landmark and Triumph transactions is expected during the fourth quarter of 2021 and is subject to certain closing conditions, including approval by the shareholders of Landmark and Triumph, as well as customary regulatory approvals.

We continuously evaluate our branch network to ensure it reflects our core footprint and changes in customer behavior which allows us to efficiently serve our customers’ evolving needs. As part of our ongoing branch right sizing initiative, during the second quarter of 2021, we announced plans to close 12 branches during the third quarter of 2021.

Simmons Bank was named to Forbes magazine’s list of “World’s Best Banks” for the second consecutive year and ranked among the top 30 banks in Forbes’ list of “America’s Best Banks” for 2021. We continue to introduce new and innovative products and services using digital channels to provide an enhanced customer experience to “bank when you want, where you want”.

On March 12, 2021, we completed the sale of four Simmons Bank locations in the Metro East area of Southern Illinois, near St. Louis. We recognized a gain of $5.3 million on the sale of the Illinois branches.

We delivered solid performance in multiple areas while continuing to navigate the challenging environment. We are still feeling the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in the economy and some industries are still struggling to return to pre-COVID levels of performance; however, our asset quality continued to show marked improvement during the second quarter of 2021.

Stockholders’ equity as of June 30, 2021 was $3.0 billion, book value per share was $28.03 and tangible book value per share was $17.16. Our ratio of common stockholders’ equity to total assets was 12.97% and the ratio of tangible common stockholders’ equity to tangible assets was 8.36% at June 30, 2021. The Company’s Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8.99%, as well as our other regulatory capital ratios, remain significantly above the “well capitalized” guidelines (see Table 12 in the Capital section of this Item).

Total deposits were $18.3 billion at June 30, 2021, compared to $17.0 billion at December 31, 2020 and $16.6 billion at June 30, 2020. The increase in total deposits is, in significant part, a reflection of the multiple rounds of economic stimulus legislation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that have created a rapid rise in liquidity and have led to changes in customer spending habits. Trends affected by the increase in customer cash balances are pay downs on loans, decreased loan demand, reduced credit card balances and fewer overdraft activities.
 
Total loans were $11.4 billion at June 30, 2021, compared to $12.9 billion at December 31, 2020 and $14.6 billion at June 30, 2020. Total loan production (loan originations and advances) during the first half of 2021 totaled $1.8 billion, which positions us to exceed loan production volume reported for the full year of 2020. While loan originations and advances are outpacing prior year production, the decline in loan balances reflects, in significant part, the substantial government stimulus to support the economy during the COVID-19 pandemic which contributed to an increase in the level of loan paydowns, payoffs and corresponding sluggish loan demand throughout the financial services industry.


48




As of June 30, 2021, we had $441.4 million in loans outstanding under the PPP. The change in total PPP loan balances during the second quarter of 2021 was as follows:

PPPPPPTotal
(Dollars in thousands)Round 1Round 2PPP Loans
Beginning balance, January 1, 2021$904,673 $— $904,673 
PPP loan originations— 318,906 318,906 
PPP loan forgiveness and repayments(763,902)(18,324)(782,226)
Ending balance, June 30, 2021$140,771 $300,582 $441,353 

PPP loans are 100% federally guaranteed and have a zero percent risk-weight for regulatory capital ratios. As a result, excluding PPP loans from total assets, common equity to total assets was 13.22% and tangible common equity to tangible assets was 8.53% as of June 30, 2021.

We continue to closely monitor the COVID-19 pandemic and expect to make future changes to respond as this situation continues to evolve. Further economic downturns accompanying this pandemic, or a delayed economic recovery from this pandemic, could result in increased deterioration in credit quality, past due loans, loans charge offs and collateral value declines, which could cause our results of operations and financial condition to be negatively impacted.

In our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” we provide certain financial information determined by methods other than in accordance with US GAAP. We believe the presentation of non-GAAP financial measures provides a meaningful basis for period-to-period and company-to-company comparisons, which we believe will assist investors and analysts in analyzing the core financial measures of the Company and predicting future performance. See the GAAP Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures section below for additional discussion and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures.

Simmons First National Corporation is a Mid-South based financial holding company that, as of June 30, 2021, has approximately $23.4 billion in consolidated assets and, through its subsidiaries, conducts financial operations in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Overview
 
We follow accounting and reporting policies that conform, in all material respects, to US GAAP and to general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. While we base estimates on historical experience, current information and other factors deemed to be relevant, actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
We consider accounting estimates to be critical to reported financial results if (i) the accounting estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain and (ii) different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, could have a material impact on our financial statements. 

The accounting policies that we view as critical to us are those relating to estimates and judgments regarding (a) the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, (b) acquisition accounting and valuation of loans, (c) the valuation of goodwill and the useful lives applied to intangible assets, (d) the valuation of stock-based compensation plans and (e) income taxes.

Allowance for Credit Losses
 
The allowance for credit losses is a reserve established through a provision for credit losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of lifetime expected losses based on reasonable and supportable forecasts, historical loss experience, and other qualitative considerations. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for expected credit losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. Our allowance for credit loss methodology includes reserve factors calculated to estimate current expected credit losses to amortized cost balances over the remaining contractual life of the portfolio, adjusted for prepayments, in accordance with ASC Topic 326-20, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. Accordingly, the methodology is
49




based on our reasonable and supportable economic forecasts, historical loss experience, and other qualitative adjustments. For further information see the section Allowance for Credit Losses below.

Our evaluation of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates. The actual amounts of credit losses realized in the near term could differ from the amounts estimated in arriving at the allowance for credit losses reported in the financial statements. On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted the new CECL methodology. See Note 1, Preparation of Interim Financial Statements, in the accompanying Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Acquisition Accounting, Loans

We account for our acquisitions under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. In accordance with ASC 326, we record both a discount and an allowance for credit losses on acquired loans. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820. The fair value estimates associated with the loans included estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows.

We evaluate loans acquired in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 310-20, Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. The fair value discount on these loans is accreted into interest income over the weighted average life of the loans using a constant yield method.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that also lack physical substance but can be separately distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in combination with a related contract, asset or liability. We perform an annual goodwill impairment test, and more than annually if circumstances warrant, in accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, as amended by ASU 2011-08 – Testing Goodwill for Impairment and ASU 2017-04 - Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. ASC Topic 350 requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives be reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if certain conditions occur. Impairment losses on recorded goodwill, if any, will be recorded as operating expenses.

Stock-Based Compensation Plans
 
We have adopted various stock-based compensation plans. The plans provide for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance stock units. Pursuant to the plans, shares are reserved for future issuance by the Company upon exercise of stock options or awarding of restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance stock units granted to directors, officers and other key employees.
 
In accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, the fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses various assumptions. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, changes to which can materially affect the fair value estimate. For additional information, see Note 16, Stock-Based Compensation, in the accompanying Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.

Income Taxes
 
We are subject to the federal income tax laws of the United States, and the tax laws of the states and other jurisdictions where we conduct business. Due to the complexity of these laws, taxpayers and the taxing authorities may subject these laws to different interpretations. Management must make conclusions and estimates about the application of these innately intricate laws, related regulations, and case law. When preparing the Company’s income tax returns, management attempts to make reasonable interpretations of the tax laws. Taxing authorities have the ability to challenge management’s analysis of the tax law or any reinterpretation management makes in its ongoing assessment of facts and the developing case law. Management assesses the reasonableness of its effective tax rate quarterly based on its current estimate of net income and the applicable taxes expected for the full year. On a quarterly basis, management also reviews circumstances and developments in tax law affecting the reasonableness of deferred tax assets and liabilities and reserves for contingent tax liabilities.

50




NET INTEREST INCOME
 
Overview
 
Net interest income, our principal source of earnings, is the difference between the interest income generated by earning assets and the total interest cost of the deposits and borrowings obtained to fund those assets. Factors that determine the level of net interest income include the volume of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, yields earned and rates paid, the level of non-performing loans and the amount of non-interest bearing liabilities supporting earning assets. Net interest income is analyzed in the discussion and tables below on a fully taxable equivalent basis. The adjustment to convert certain income to a fully taxable equivalent basis consists of dividing tax-exempt income by one minus the combined federal and state income tax rate of 26.135%.
 
Our practice is to limit exposure to interest rate movements by maintaining a significant portion of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities in short-term repricing. In the last several years, on average, approximately 41% of our loan portfolio and approximately 74% of our time deposits have repriced in one year or less. Our current interest rate sensitivity shows that approximately 44% of our loans and 86% of our time deposits will reprice in the next year.

Net Interest Income Quarter-to-Date Analysis

For the three month period ended June 30, 2021, net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis was $151.1 million, a decrease of $15.0 million, or 9.0%, over the same period in 2020. The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result of a $22.5 million decrease in fully tax equivalent interest income partially offset by a $7.5 million decrease in interest expense.

The reduction in interest income primarily resulted from a $38.2 million decrease in interest income on loans partially offset by an increase of $15.9 million in interest income on investment securities. The decrease in interest income on loans during the second quarter of 2021, reflects a lower average loan balance combined with an 11 basis point decline in loan yield. The loan yield for the second quarter of 2021 was 4.73% compared to 4.84% from the same period in 2020. We generated additional interest income on investment securities by redeploying a portion of excess cash to purchase $2.5 billion of investment securities during the second quarter of 2021, which included $1.1 billion of short-term, variable rate securities.

The $7.5 million decrease in interest expense is mostly due to the decline in our deposit account rates. Interest expense decreased $7.7 million due to the decrease in yield of 27 basis points on interest-bearing deposit accounts.

Net Interest Income Year-to-Date Analysis

For the six month period ended June 30, 2021, net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis was $301.9 million, a decrease of $33.9 million, or 10.1%, over the same period in 2020. The decrease in net interest income was the result of a $60.4 million decrease in fully tax equivalent interest income partially offset by a $26.5 million decrease in interest expense.

The decrease in interest income during the first half of 2021 primarily resulted from a $79.3 million decrease in interest income on loans, that reflects a decrease in loan volume of $59.4 million coupled with a 27 basis point decline in yield that resulted in a $19.9 million decrease, partially offset by an increase in interest income on investment securities of $20.4 million. The decrease in our loan volume during the first six months of 2021 was primarily due to weak loan demand throughout 2020 and into the first half of 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the decline in loan volume also reflects the substantial governmental stimulus to support the economy during the COVID-19 pandemic which contributed to an increase in the level of loan paydowns and payoffs.

We sold approximately $249.5 million of investment securities during the first half of 2021 compared to $1.2 billion of investment securities during the same period in 2020. During the second quarter of 2020, in response to the unfolding events of the COVID-19 pandemic, we focused on the creation of additional liquidity and strengthening our balance sheet. We began to re-invest in our investment security portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2020 and continued into the first half of 2021.

The $26.5 million decrease in interest expense is mostly due to the decrease in our deposit account rates. Interest expense decreased $27.4 million due to the decrease in yield of 44 basis points on interest-bearing deposit accounts, partially offset by an increase of $2.0 million related to approximately $1.1 billion in average deposit growth.

51




Net Interest Margin
 
Our net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis decreased 53 basis points to 2.89% for the three month period ended June 30, 2021, when compared to 3.42% for the same period in 2020. Normalized for all accretion, our core net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 was 2.78% and 3.18%, respectively. For the six month period ended June 30, 2021, our net interest margin decreased 61 basis points to 2.94% when compared to 3.55% for the same period in 2020.

The decreases in the net interest margin during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same periods in 2020, were primarily due to the aforementioned decline in net interest income coupled with a $1.6 billion increase in average cash and equivalents driven by the lower interest rate environment and additional liquidity created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We purchased investment securities which added approximately $2.5 billion to our average investment securities portfolio during the first half of 2021. The impact of these items on net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2021 was 27 basis points, bringing the net interest margin adjusted for PPP loans and additional liquidity to 3.21%.

During March 2020, the Federal Open Market Committee, or FOMC, of the Federal Reserve substantially reduced interest rates in response to the economic crisis brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic and rates have continued to remain at historically low levels through the second quarter of 2021. As such, our variable rate loan portfolio has repriced to a lower yield and, in response to offset the decline, we have worked to lower our cost of deposits. In addition, our decreased net interest margin is being driven by the decrease in our non-PPP loan portfolio as a result of COVID-19 but our loan pipeline has started to rebuild and we expect modest organic loan growth during the second half of 2021.

Net Interest Income Tables
 
Tables 1 and 2 reflect an analysis of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Table 1: Analysis of Net Interest Margin
(FTE = Fully Taxable Equivalent using an effective tax rate of 26.135%)


 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)2021202020212020
Interest income$166,969 $191,654 $336,403 $400,885 
FTE adjustment4,548 2,350 8,711 4,655 
Interest income – FTE171,517 194,004 345,114 405,540 
Interest expense20,436 27,973 43,189 69,721 
Net interest income – FTE$151,081 $166,031 $301,925 $335,819 
Yield on earning assets – FTE3.28 %4.00 %3.36 %4.28 %
Cost of interest bearing liabilities0.54 %0.78 %0.57 %0.98 %
Net interest spread – FTE2.74 %3.22 %2.79 %3.30 %
Net interest margin – FTE2.89 %3.42 %2.94 %3.55 %

Table 2: Changes in Fully Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Margin 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)2021 vs. 20202021 vs. 2020
Decrease due to change in earning assets$(15,336)$(27,555)
Decrease due to change in earning asset yields(7,151)(32,871)
Decrease due to change in interest bearing liabilities(89)(1,566)
Increase due to change in interest rates paid on interest bearing liabilities7,626 28,098 
Decrease in net interest income$(14,950)$(33,894)


52




Table 3 shows, for each major category of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, the average (computed on a daily basis) amount outstanding, the interest earned or expensed on such amount and the average rate earned or expensed for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. The table also shows the average rate earned on all earning assets, the average rate expensed on all interest bearing liabilities, the net interest spread and the net interest margin for the same periods. The analysis is presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis. Nonaccrual loans were included in average loans for the purpose of calculating the rate earned on total loans.

Table 3: Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Income Analysis
(FTE = Fully Taxable Equivalent using an effective tax rate of 26.135%)

Three Months Ended June 30,
20212020
AverageIncome/Yield/AverageIncome/Yield/
(In thousands)BalanceExpenseRate (%)BalanceExpenseRate (%)
ASSETS
Earning assets:
Interest bearing balances due from banks and federal funds sold
$2,703,920 $651 0.10 $2,190,878 $603 0.11 
Investment securities - taxable
4,265,545 14,594 1.37 1,642,083 7,131 1.75 
Investment securities - non-taxable
2,157,076 16,899 3.14 866,944 8,434 3.91 
Mortgage loans held for sale
49,262 386 3.14 86,264 668 3.11 
Loans
11,783,839 138,987 4.73 14,731,306 177,168 4.84 
Total interest earning assets20,959,642 171,517 3.28 19,517,475 194,004 4.00 
Non-earning assets2,298,279 2,304,798 
Total assets$23,257,921 $21,822,273 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:      
Interest bearing liabilities:      
Interest bearing transaction and savings deposits
$10,403,932 $4,721 0.18 $9,138,563 $7,203 0.32 
Time deposits2,930,025 6,061 0.83 3,057,153 10,803 1.42 
Total interest bearing deposits13,333,957 10,782 0.32 12,195,716 18,006 0.59 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
240,876 192 0.32 392,633 337 0.35 
Other borrowings1,340,008 4,897 1.47 1,395,109 4,963 1.43 
Subordinated debt and debentures383,078 4,565 4.78 387,422 4,667 4.84 
Total interest bearing liabilities15,297,919 20,436 0.54 14,370,880 27,973 0.78 
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits4,826,927 4,354,781 
Other liabilities151,699 216,508 
Total liabilities20,276,545 18,942,169 
Stockholders’ equity2,981,376 2,880,104 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$23,257,921 $21,822,273 
Net interest spread – FTE2.74 3.22 
Net interest margin – FTE$151,081 2.89 $166,031 3.42 
53






Six Months Ended June 30,
20212020
AverageIncome/Yield/AverageIncome/Yield/
(In thousands)BalanceExpenseRate (%)BalanceExpenseRate (%)
ASSETS
Earning assets:
Interest bearing balances due from banks and federal funds sold
$3,088,816 $1,449 0.09 $1,477,759 $3,044 0.41 
Investment securities - taxable
3,373,375 24,714 1.48 1,983,134 19,883 2.02 
Investment securities - non-taxable
2,039,153 32,338 3.20 883,585 16,749 3.81 
Mortgage loans held for sale
73,202 1,025 2.82 64,927 949 2.94 
Loans
12,149,041 285,588 4.74 14,640,082 364,915 5.01 
Total interest earning assets20,723,587 345,114 3.36 19,049,487 405,540 4.28 
Non-earning assets2,276,218 2,321,761 
Total assets$22,999,805 $21,371,248 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:      
Interest bearing liabilities:      
Interest bearing transaction and savings deposits
$10,249,756 $10,809 0.21 $9,072,133 $25,157 0.56 
Time deposits2,986,201 13,152 0.89 3,104,030 24,126 1.56 
Total interest bearing deposits13,235,957 23,961 0.37 12,176,163 49,283 0.81 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
274,024 437 0.32 361,768 1,096 0.61 
Other borrowings1,340,531 9,699 1.46 1,357,677 9,840 1.46 
Subordinated debt and debentures383,011 9,092 4.79 387,876 9,502 4.93 
Total interest bearing liabilities15,233,523 43,189 0.57 14,283,484 69,721 0.98 
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits4,624,158 3,978,728 
Other liabilities164,686 213,918 
Total liabilities20,022,367 18,476,130 
Stockholders’ equity2,977,438 2,895,118 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$22,999,805 $21,371,248 
Net interest spread – FTE2.79 3.30 
Net interest margin – FTE$301,925 2.94 $335,819 3.55 

54




Table 4 shows changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in both volume and interest rates for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021, as compared to the same periods of the prior year. The changes in interest rate and volume have been allocated to changes in average volume and changes in average rates in proportion to the relationship of absolute dollar amounts of the changes in rates and volume.
 
Table 4: Volume/Rate Analysis 

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2021 vs. 20202021 vs. 2020
(In thousands, on a fully taxable equivalent basis)VolumeYield/
Rate
TotalVolumeYield/
Rate
Total
Increase (decrease) in:   
Interest income:   
Interest bearing balances due from banks and federal funds sold$129 $(81)$48 $1,819 $(3,414)$(1,595)
Investment securities - taxable9,259 (1,796)7,463 11,228 (6,397)4,831 
Investment securities - non-taxable10,390 (1,925)8,465 18,724 (3,135)15,589 
Mortgage loans held for sale(290)(282)117 (41)76 
Loans(34,824)(3,357)(38,181)(59,443)(19,884)(79,327)
Total(15,336)(7,151)(22,487)(27,555)(32,871)(60,426)
Interest expense:
Interest bearing transaction and savings accounts893 (3,375)(2,482)2,915 (17,263)(14,348)
Time deposits(432)(4,310)(4,742)(884)(10,090)(10,974)
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase(122)(23)(145)(223)(436)(659)
Other borrowings(199)133 (66)(124)(17)(141)
Subordinated notes and debentures(51)(51)(102)(118)(292)(410)
Total89 (7,626)(7,537)1,566 (28,098)(26,532)
Decrease in net interest income$(15,425)$475 $(14,950)$(29,121)$(4,773)$(33,894)

PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
 
The provision for credit losses represents management’s determination of the amount necessary to be charged against the current period’s earnings in order to maintain the allowance for credit losses at a level considered appropriate in relation to the estimated lifetime risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of provision to the allowance is based on management’s judgment, with consideration given to the composition, maturity and other qualitative characteristics of the portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, reasonable and supportable forecasts, past due and non-performing loans and historical net credit loss experience. It is management’s practice to review the allowance on a monthly basis and, after considering the factors previously noted, to determine the level of provision made to the allowance.
 
The provision for credit losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 was a recapture of $13.0 million and $11.5 million, respectively, compared to an expense of $21.9 million and $45.0 million for the same periods ended June 30, 2020. The recapture of credit losses was driven by improved credit quality metrics and improved macroeconomic factors. Two energy credits that experienced further deterioration and were negatively impacted by the sharp decline in commodity pricing during the first quarter of 2020, resulting in incremental provision expense of $22.0 million during that quarter and combined with uncertain economic forecasts during the first six months of 2020 to drive higher provisions for credit losses during that period.

55




NON-INTEREST INCOME
 
Non-interest income is principally derived from recurring fee income, which includes service charges, trust fees and debit and credit card fees. Non-interest income also includes income on the sale of mortgage and SBA loans, investment banking income, income from the increase in cash surrender values of bank owned life insurance and gains (losses) from sales of securities.

Total non-interest income was $47.9 million for the three month period June 30, 2021, a decrease of approximately $882,000, or 1.8%, compared to the same period in 2020, primarily driven by decreases in mortgage lending income and the difference in gains on sale of branches recognized during the periods. Conversely, we had increases in total service charges on deposit accounts and fees of $2.0 million, or 20.3%, primarily attributable to additional customer transactions related to changes in customer spending habits and incremental gains on the sale of securities during the second quarter of 2021.

For the six month period ended June 30, 2021, total non-interest income was $98.3 million, a decrease of approximately $31.6 million, or 24.3%, compared to the same period in 2020, primarily due to decreases in the gains on sale of securities and mortgage lending income. During the first six months of 2021, we sold approximately $249.5 million of investment securities resulting in a net gain of $10.6 million, compared to $1.2 billion of investment securities sold for a net gain of $32.5 million in the first six months of 2020. Additionally, the gain on sale of branches decreased approximately $2.2 million, which we consider a non-core item, compared to the same period in 2020. An increase of $2.1 million in debit and credit fees partially offset the overall decrease in non-interest income during the first six months of 2021 as a result of additional transactions due to the changes in customer spending habits.

Decreases of $8.0 million and $6.6 million in mortgage lending income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 were largely a result of decreases in the value of derivative contracts related to the mortgage banking operations partially offset by gains on the sale of mortgage loans that were driven by an increase in volume of loans sold during the first half of 2021 compared to the same period in 2020. Beginning in 2020 and continuing into 2021, we experienced an increase in mortgage lending transactions as a result of the low mortgage interest rate environment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we expect mortgage lending volume to continue to decline throughout 2021 given the current environment.

Table 5 shows non-interest income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, as well as changes in 2021 from 2020.
 
Table 5: Non-Interest Income
Three Months Ended
June 30,
2021
Change from
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2021
Change from
(Dollars in thousands)202120202020202120202020
Trust income$7,238 $7,253 $(15)(0.2)%$13,904 $14,404 $(500)(3.5)%
Service charges on deposit accounts10,050 8,570 1,480 17.319,765 21,898 (2,133)(9.7)
Other service charges and fees2,048 1,489 559 37.53,970 3,077 893 29.0
Mortgage lending income4,490 12,459 (7,969)(64.0)10,937 17,505 (6,568)(37.5)
SBA lending income287 245 42 17.1527 541 (14)(2.6)
Investment banking income654 571 83 14.51,349 1,448 (99)(6.8)
Debit and credit card fees (1)
7,882 6,575 1,307 19.915,283 13,140 2,143 16.3
Bank owned life insurance income2,038 1,445 593 41.03,561 2,743 818 29.8
Gain on sale of securities, net5,127 390 4,737 *10,598 32,485 (21,887)(67.4)
Gain on sale of branches445 2,204 (1,759)(79.8)5,922 8,093 (2,171)(26.8)
Other income7,665 7,605 60 0.812,448 14,517 (2,069)(14.3)
Total non-interest income$47,924 $48,806 $(882)(1.8)%$98,264 $129,851 $(31,587)(24.3)%
_________________________
(1)    During the second quarter of 2021, certain debit and credit card transaction fees were reclassified from non-interest expense to non-interest income. Prior periods have been adjusted to reflect this reclassification.
*    Not meaningful

Recurring fee income (total service charges, trust fees, debit and credit card fees) for the three month period ended June 30, 2021 was $27.2 million, an increase of $3.3 million from the same period in 2020. Recurring fee income for the six month period ended June 30, 2021, was $52.9 million, an increase of $403,000 from the six month period ended June 30, 2020. The increases in the periods presented are primarily the result of changes in total service charges and debit and credit card fees, previously discussed.
56




NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
 
Non-interest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment, foreclosure losses and other expenses necessary for our operations. Management remains committed to controlling the level of non-interest expense through the continued use of expense control measures. We utilize an extensive profit planning and reporting system involving all subsidiaries. Based on a needs assessment of the business plan for the upcoming year, monthly and annual profit plans are developed, including manpower and capital expenditure budgets. These profit plans are subject to extensive initial reviews and monitored by management monthly. Variances from the plan are reviewed monthly and, when required, management takes corrective action intended to ensure financial goals are met. We also regularly monitor staffing levels at each subsidiary to ensure productivity and overhead are in line with existing workload requirements.
 
For the three month period ended June 30, 2021, non-interest expense was $115.5 million, a decrease of $711,000, or 0.6%, from the three month period ended June 30, 2020. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $3.1 million during the three month period of 2021 due to associates being hired in lending, wealth and mortgage as we continue to actively recruit new producers.

Non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021 was $229.3 million, a decrease of $14.4 million, or 5.9%, from the same period in 2020. Normalizing for the non-core costs, core non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021 decreased $11.0 million, or 4.6%, from the same period in 2020.

The decreases in non-interest expense were primarily related to the realization of expected synergies from the continuous evaluation of our branch network and the branch sales and closures that began in 2020 and have continued in 2021. Additionally, salaries and employee benefits expense during the six month period June 30, 2021 was impacted by savings resulting from the early retirement program offered in the prior year.

Table 6 below shows non-interest expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, as well as changes in 2021 from 2020.
 
Table 6: Non-Interest Expense 

Three Months Ended
June 30,
2021
Change from
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2021
Change from
(Dollars in thousands)202120202020202120202020
Salaries and employee benefits$60,261 $57,151 $3,110 5.4%$120,601 $125,075 $(4,474)(3.6)%
Early retirement expense— 493 (493)(100.0)— 493 (493)(100.0)
Occupancy expense, net9,103 9,217 (114)(1.2)18,403 18,727 (324)(1.7)
Furniture and equipment expense4,859 6,144 (1,285)(20.9)10,274 11,867 (1,593)(13.4)
Other real estate and foreclosure expense863 274 589 *1,206 599 607 101.3
Deposit insurance1,687 2,838 (1,151)(41.0)2,995 5,313 (2,318)(43.6)
Merger related costs686 1,830 (1,144)(62.5)919 2,898 (1,979)(68.3)
Other operating expenses:
Professional services4,561 3,921 640 16.39,808 9,750 58 0.6
Postage1,943 1,769 174 9.84,313 4,005 308 7.7
Telephone1,610 2,450 (840)(34.3)3,242 4,635 (1,393)(30.1)
Credit card (1)
3,339 3,161 178 5.66,461 6,194 267 4.3
Marketing4,740 3,528 1,212 34.47,893 7,913 (20)(0.3)
Software and technology9,857 10,024 (167)(1.7)20,108 19,469 639 3.3
Operating supplies838 828 10 1.21,408 1,764 (356)(20.2)
Amortization of intangibles3,332 3,369 (37)(1.1)6,676 6,782 (106)(1.6)
Branch right sizing468 1,721 (1,253)(72.8)1,093 1,959 (866)(44.2)
Other 7,319 7,459 (140)(1.9)13,859 16,198 (2,339)(14.4)
Total non-interest expense$115,466 $116,177 $(711)(0.6)%$229,259 $243,641 $(14,382)(5.9)%
_________________________
(1)    During the second quarter of 2021, certain debit and credit card transaction fees were reclassified from non-interest expense to non-interest income. Prior periods have been adjusted to reflect this reclassification.
*    Not meaningful
57




INVESTMENTS AND SECURITIES

Our securities portfolio is the second largest component of earning assets and provides a significant source of revenue. Securities within the portfolio are classified as either HTM or AFS. Our philosophy regarding investments is conservative based on investment type and maturity. Investments in the portfolio primarily include U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government agencies, MBS and municipal securities. Our general policy is not to invest in derivative type investments or high-risk securities, except for collateralized MBS for which collection of principal and interest is not subordinated to significant superior rights held by others.

HTM and AFS investment securities were $931.4 million and $6.6 billion, respectively, at June 30, 2021, compared to the HTM amount of $333.0 million and AFS amount of $3.5 billion at December 31, 2020. As anticipated, our security portfolio increased during the first six months of 2021 as we reinvested PPP loan repayments and utilized additional liquidity held in cash and cash equivalents. During the second quarter of 2021, we purchased $2.5 billion of investment securities, including strategically redeploying $1.1 billion of excess cash into short-term, variable rate securities, as previously discussed. We will continue to look for opportunities to maximize the value of the investment portfolio.

Management has the ability and intent to hold the securities classified as HTM until they mature, at which time we expect to receive full value for the securities. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Furthermore, as of June 30, 2021, management also had the ability and intent to hold the securities classified as AFS for a period of time sufficient for a recovery of cost. The unrealized losses are largely due to increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. Management does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons of credit quality.

LOAN PORTFOLIO
 
Our loan portfolio averaged $12.15 billion and $14.64 billion during the first six months of 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of June 30, 2021, total loans were $11.39 billion, a decrease of $1.5 billion from December 31, 2020. The decline in the average loan balance during the first half of 2021 when compared to the same period in 2020 was due to the tepid loan demand that began in late first quarter of 2020 and has continued through 2021 largely as a result of the economic uncertainty stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. The most significant components of the loan portfolio were loans to businesses (commercial loans, commercial real estate loans and agricultural loans) and individuals (consumer loans, credit card loans and single-family residential real estate loans).

We seek to manage our credit risk by diversifying our loan portfolio, determining that borrowers have adequate sources of cash flow for loan repayment without liquidation of collateral, obtaining and monitoring collateral, providing an appropriate allowance for credit losses and regularly reviewing loans through the internal loan review process. The loan portfolio is diversified by borrower, purpose, industry and geographic region. We seek to use diversification within the loan portfolio to reduce credit risk, thereby minimizing the adverse impact on the portfolio, if weaknesses develop in either the economy or a particular segment of borrowers. Collateral requirements are based on credit assessments of borrowers and may be used to recover the debt in case of default. We use the allowance for credit losses as a method to value the loan portfolio at its estimated collectible amount. Loans are regularly reviewed to facilitate the identification and monitoring of deteriorating credits.


58




The balances of loans outstanding at the indicated dates are reflected in Table 7, according to type of loan.

Table 7: Loan Portfolio 
June 30,December 31,
(In thousands)20212020
Consumer:  
Credit cards$177,634 $188,845 
Other consumer181,712 202,379 
Total consumer359,346 391,224 
Real estate:
Construction and development1,428,165 1,596,255 
Single family residential1,608,028 1,880,673 
Other commercial5,332,655 5,746,863 
Total real estate8,368,848 9,223,791 
Commercial:
Commercial2,074,729 2,574,386 
Agricultural193,462 175,905 
Total commercial2,268,191 2,750,291 
Other389,967 535,591 
Total loans before allowance for credit losses$11,386,352 $12,900,897 

Consumer loans consist of credit card loans and other consumer loans. Consumer loans were $359.3 million at June 30, 2021, or 3.2% of total loans, compared to $391.2 million, or 3.0% of total loans at December 31, 2020. The decrease in consumer loans from December 31, 2020, to June 30, 2021, was primarily due to the expected seasonal decline in our credit card portfolio as well as loan payoffs and pay downs due to additional customer liquidity driven by the government economic stimulus programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Real estate loans consist of C&D loans, single-family residential loans and CRE loans. Real estate loans were $8.37 billion at June 30, 2021, or 73.5% of total loans, compared to $9.22 billion, or 71.5%, of total loans at December 31, 2020, a decrease of $854.9 million, or 9.3%. Our C&D loans decreased by $168.1 million, or 10.5%, single family residential loans decreased by $272.6 million, or 14.5%, and CRE loans decreased by $414.2 million, or 7.2%. The decreases were largely due to less activity as a result of the pandemic and our effort to manage our real estate portfolio concentration. In the near term, we expect to continue to manage our C&D and CRE portfolio concentration by developing deeper relationships with our customers.

Commercial loans consist of non-real estate loans related to business and agricultural loans. Total commercial loans were $2.27 billion at June 30, 2021, or 19.9% of total loans, compared to $2.75 billion, or 21.3% of total loans at December 31, 2020, a decrease of $482.1 million, or 17.5%. PPP loan balances declined by $782.2 million during the first six months of 2021 as a result of expected reimbursements from the SBA related to PPP loan forgiveness, partially offset by PPP Round 2 loan originations of $318.9 million during 2021. We expect PPP balances to continue to decline through the remainder of the year. Agricultural loans increased $17.6 million, or 10.0%, primarily due to seasonality of the portfolio, which normally peaks in the third quarter. In addition, we are continuing with our planned exit of the energy portfolio.

Other loans mainly consists of mortgage warehouse lending. Mortgage volume, while still strong, declined during the first six months of 2021 when compared to 2020, leading to a decrease of $145.6 million in other loans primarily from mortgage warehouse lines of credit.

Loan demand appears to be returning to more normalized levels. For the third consecutive quarter, we have experienced an increase in commercial loan demand. Our loan pipeline consisting of all loan opportunities was $1.3 billion at June 30, 2021 compared to $673.7 million at December 31, 2020. Loans approved and ready to close at the end of the quarter totaled $467.1 million.

59




ASSET QUALITY
 
Non-performing loans are comprised of (a) nonaccrual loans, (b) loans that are contractually past due 90 days and (c) other loans for which terms have been restructured to provide a reduction or deferral of interest or principal, because of deterioration in the financial position of the borrower. Simmons Bank recognizes income principally on the accrual basis of accounting. When loans are classified as nonaccrual, generally, the accrued interest is charged off and no further interest is accrued. Loans, excluding credit card loans, are placed on a nonaccrual basis either: (1) when there are serious doubts regarding the collectability of principal or interest or (2) when payment of interest or principal is 90 days or more past due and either (i) not fully secured or (ii) not in the process of collection. If a loan is determined by management to be uncollectible, the portion of the loan determined to be uncollectible is then charged to the allowance for credit losses.

When credit card loans reach 90 days past due and there are attachable assets, the accounts are considered for litigation. Credit card loans are generally charged off when payment of interest or principal exceeds 150 days past due. The credit card recovery group pursues account holders until it is determined, on a case-by-case basis, to be uncollectible.

Total non-performing assets decreased $46.6 million from December 31, 2020 to June 30, 2021. Nonaccrual loans decreased by $42.6 million during the period and foreclosed assets held for sale and other real estate owned decreased by $3.2 million. The decrease in nonaccrual loans was primarily due to an overall improvement in economic conditions while the decrease in foreclosed assets held for sale and other real estate owned is mainly the result of the disposition of one commercial building in the St. Louis area partially offset by $4.4 million in closed bank branch facilities that were reclassified from premises held for sale during the second quarter of 2021.

Non-performing assets, including troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) and acquired foreclosed assets, as a percent of total assets were 0.43% at June 30, 2021, compared to 0.66% at December 31, 2020. From time to time, certain borrowers experience declines in income and cash flow. As a result, these borrowers seek to reduce contractual cash outlays, the most prominent being debt payments. In an effort to preserve our net interest margin and earning assets, we are open to working with existing customers in order to maximize the collectability of the debt.
 
When we restructure a loan for a borrower experiencing financial difficulty and grant a concession we would not otherwise consider, a “troubled debt restructuring” occurs and the loan is classified as a TDR. The Company grants various types of concessions, primarily interest rate reduction and/or payment modifications or extensions, with an occasional forgiveness of principal.
 
Once an obligation has been restructured due to such credit problems, it continues to be considered a TDR until paid in full; or, if an obligation yields a market interest rate and no longer has any concession regarding payment amount or amortization, then it is not considered a TDR at the beginning of the calendar year after the year in which the improvement takes place. Our TDR balance remained relatively flat at $7.1 million as of June 30, 2021, decreasing $417,000 from December 31, 2020.

TDRs are individually evaluated for expected credit losses. We assess the exposure for each modification, using either the fair value of the underlying collateral or the present value of expected cash flows, and determine if a specific allowance for credit losses is needed.

We return TDRs to accrual status only if (1) all contractual amounts due can reasonably be expected to be repaid within a prudent period, and (2) repayment has been in accordance with the contract for a sustained period, typically at least six months.

The provisions in the CARES Act included an election to not apply the guidance on accounting for TDRs to loan modifications, such as extensions or deferrals, related to COVID-19 made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of (i) December 31, 2020 or (ii) 60 days after the President terminates the COVID-19 national emergency declaration. The relief can only be applied to modifications for borrowers that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The Company elected to adopt these provisions of the CARES Act and is following the Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus (Revised) issued by regulatory agencies. In response to the concerns related to the expiration of the applicable period for which the election to not apply the guidance on accounting for TDRs to loan modifications, the CARES Act was amended late in the fourth quarter of 2020 to extend COVID-19 relief related to loan modifications to the earlier of (i) January 1, 2022 or (ii) 60 days after the President terminates the COVID-19 national emergency declaration.


60




During 2020 and the first half of 2021, we processed over 3,700 COVID-19 loan modifications in excess of $3.0 billion. At June 30, 2021, the Company had 43 COVID-19 loan modifications outstanding in the amount of $134.5 million. The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on the hotel, restaurant and retail industries, causing our borrowers in those industries to require loan modifications. At June 30, 2021, the majority of these balances have returned to regular payments and we expect most of the remaining COVID-19 loan modifications to return to regular payments with no credit downgrade or long-term restructure.

We continue to maintain good asset quality compared to the industry and strong asset quality remains a primary focus of our strategy. The allowance for credit losses as a percent of total loans was 2.00% as of June 30, 2021. Non-performing loans equaled 0.71% of total loans. Non-performing assets were 0.42% of total assets, a 22 basis point decrease from December 31, 2020. The allowance for credit losses was 281% of non-performing loans. Our annualized net charge-offs to average total loans for the first six months of 2021 was (0.07)%. Excluding credit cards, the annualized net charge-offs to average total loans for the same period was (0.10)%. Annualized net credit card charge-offs to average total credit card loans were 1.78%, compared to 1.60% during the full year 2020, and 117 basis points better than the most recently published industry average charge-off ratio as reported by the Federal Reserve for all banks.

Table 9 presents information concerning non-performing assets, including nonaccrual loans at amortized cost and foreclosed assets held for sale. 

Table 9: Non-performing Assets 
June 30,December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20212020
Nonaccrual loans (1)
$80,282 $122,879 
Loans past due 90 days or more (principal or interest payments)653 578 
Total non-performing loans80,935 123,457 
Other non-performing assets:
Foreclosed assets held for sale and other real estate owned15,239 18,393 
Other non-performing assets1,062 2,016 
Total other non-performing assets16,301 20,409 
Total non-performing assets$97,236 $143,866 
Performing TDRs$4,436 $3,138 
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans281 %193 %
Non-performing loans to total loans0.71 %0.96 %
Non-performing assets (including performing TDRs) to total assets0.43 %0.66 %
Non-performing assets to total assets0.42 %0.64 %
_______________________________________
(1)Includes nonaccrual TDRs of approximately $2,660,000 at June 30, 2021 and $4,375,000 at December 31, 2020.

The interest income on nonaccrual loans is not considered material for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. 

61




ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
 
The allowance for credit losses is a reserve established through a provision for credit losses charged to expense which represents management’s best estimate of lifetime expected losses based on reasonable and supportable forecasts, historical loss experience, and other qualitative considerations.

Loans with similar risk characteristics such as loan type, collateral type, and internal risk ratings are aggregated into homogeneous segments for assessment. Reserve factors are based on estimated probability of default and loss given default for each segment. The estimates are determined based on economic forecasts over the reasonable and supportable forecast period based on projected performance of economic variables that have a statistical correlation with the historical loss experience of the segments. For contractual periods that extend beyond the one-year forecast period, the estimates revert to average historical loss experiences over a one-year period on a straight-line basis.

We also include qualitative adjustments to the allowance based on factors and considerations that have not otherwise been fully accounted for. Qualitative adjustments include, but are not limited to:

Changes in asset quality - Adjustments related to trending credit quality metrics including delinquency, non-performing loans, charge-offs, and risk ratings that may not be fully accounted for in the reserve factor.
Changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio - Adjustments related to current changes in the loan portfolio that are not fully represented or accounted for in the reserve factors.
Changes in lending and loan monitoring policies and procedures - Adjustments related to current changes in lending and loan monitoring procedures as well as review of specific internal policy compliance metrics.
Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff - Adjustments to measure increasing or decreasing credit risk related to lending and loan monitoring management.
Changes in the value of underlying collateral of collateralized loans - Adjustments related to improving or deterioration of the value of underlying collateral that are not fully captured in the reserve factors.
Changes in and the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit - Adjustments related to credit risk of specific industries that are not fully captured in the reserve factors.
Changes in regional and local economic and business conditions and developments - Adjustments related to expected and current economic conditions at a regional or local-level that are not fully captured within our reasonable and supportable forecast.
Data imprecision due to limited historical loss data - Adjustments related to limited historical loss data that is representative of the collective loan portfolio.

Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. These evaluations are typically performed on loans with a deteriorated internal risk rating or that are classified as a TDR. The allowance for credit loss is determined based on several methods including estimating the fair value of the underlying collateral or the present value of expected cash flows.


62




An analysis of the allowance for credit losses on loans is shown in Table 10.
 
Table 10: Allowance for Credit Losses 
(In thousands)20212020
Balance, beginning of year$238,050 $68,244 
Impact of CECL adoption— 151,377 
Loans charged off:
Credit card2,049 2,494 
Other consumer1,113 1,971 
Real estate2,126 2,220 
Commercial1,168 36,210 
Total loans charged off6,456 42,895 
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Credit card534 497 
Other consumer729 746 
Real estate1,926 354 
Commercial2,467 445 
Total recoveries5,656 2,042 
Net loans charged off800 40,853 
Provision for credit losses(10,011)52,875 
Balance, June 30,$227,239 $231,643 
Loans charged off:
Credit card1,619 
Other consumer2,051 
Real estate11,568 
Commercial12,526 
Total loans charged off27,764 
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Credit card517 
Other consumer719 
Real estate551 
Commercial2,771 
Total recoveries4,558 
Net loans charged off23,206 
Provision for credit losses29,613 
Balance, end of year$238,050 

Provision for Credit Losses
 
The amount of provision added to or released from the allowance during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, and for the year ended December 31, 2020, was based on management’s judgment, with consideration given to the composition of the portfolio, historical loan loss experience, assessment of current economic forecasts and conditions, past due and non-performing loans and net loss experience. It is management’s practice to review the allowance on a monthly basis, and after considering the factors previously noted, to determine the level of provision made to the allowance. 

63




Allowance for Credit Losses Allocation
 
As of June 30, 2021, the allowance for credit losses reflected a decrease of approximately $10.8 million from December 31, 2020 while total loans decreased $1.5 billion over the same six month period. The allocation in each category within the allowance generally reflects the overall changes in the loan portfolio mix. During the first quarter of 2020, we recorded an additional allowance for credit losses for loans of approximately $151.4 million due to the adoption of CECL.

The significant impact to the allowance for credit losses at the date of CECL adoption was driven by the substantial amount of loans acquired held by the Company. We had approximately one third of total loans categorized as acquired at the adoption date with very little reserve allocated to them due to the previous incurred loss impairment methodology. As such, the amount of the CECL adoption impact was greater on the Company when compared to a non-acquisitive bank.

The decrease in the allowance for credit losses during the first six months of 2021 was predominately related to economic recovery from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decline in our loan portfolio. While the economic conditions appear to be improving, certain industries continue to be more adversely impacted than others by this pandemic, such as the restaurant, retail and hotel industries, and there remains uncertainty regarding how borrowers in these industries will recover. Our allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2021 was considered appropriate given the considerable amount of uncertainty as to the structure and timing of potential economic recovery, the impact of new COVID-19 variants, future of government assistance related to COVID-19 recovery efforts and other related factors.

The following table sets forth the sum of the amounts of the allowance for credit losses attributable to individual loans within each category, or loan categories in general. The table also reflects the percentage of loans in each category to the total loan portfolio for each of the periods indicated. The allowance for credit losses by loan category is determined by i) our estimated reserve factors by category including applicable qualitative adjustments and ii) any specific allowance allocations that are identified on individually evaluated loans. The amounts shown are not necessarily indicative of the actual future losses that may occur within individual categories.
 
Table 11: Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses
 
 June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)Allowance
Amount
% of
loans (1)
Allowance
Amount
% of
loans (1)
Credit cards$5,442 1.7 %$7,472 1.4 %
Other consumer1,160 1.6 %4,100 1.6 %
Real estate188,388 73.5 %182,868 71.5 %
Commercial29,793 19.9 %42,093 21.3 %
Other2,456 3.4 %1,517 4.2 %
Total$227,239 100.0 %$238,050 100.0 %
_______________________________________
(1)Percentage of loans in each category to total loans.

64




DEPOSITS
 
Deposits are our primary source of funding for earning assets and are primarily developed through our network of approximately 198 financial centers as of June 30, 2021. We offer a variety of products designed to attract and retain customers with a continuing focus on developing core deposits. Our core deposits consist of all deposits excluding time deposits of $100,000 or more and brokered deposits. As of June 30, 2021, core deposits comprised 86.4% of our total deposits.
 
We continually monitor the funding requirements along with competitive interest rates in the markets we serve. Because of our community banking philosophy, our executives in the local markets, with oversight by the Chief Deposit Officer, Asset Liability Committee and the Bank’s Treasury Department, establish the interest rates offered on both core and non-core deposits. This approach ensures that the interest rates being paid are competitively priced for each particular deposit product and structured to meet the funding requirements. We believe we are paying a competitive rate when compared with pricing in those markets.

We manage our interest expense through deposit pricing. We believe that additional funds can be attracted and deposit growth can be accelerated through deposit pricing if we experience increased loan demand or other liquidity needs. We can also utilize brokered deposits as an additional source of funding to meet liquidity needs. We are continually monitoring and looking for opportunities to fairly reprice our deposits while remaining competitive in this current challenging rate environment.

Our total deposits as of June 30, 2021, were $18.30 billion, an increase of $1.32 billion from December 31, 2020, primarily driven by the government economic stimulus programs and changes in customer spending resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Non-interest bearing transaction accounts, interest bearing transaction accounts and savings accounts totaled $15.46 billion at June 30, 2021, compared to $14.15 billion at December 31, 2020, an increase of $1.31 billion. Total time deposits increased $8.7 million to $2.84 billion at June 30, 2021, from $2.83 billion at December 31, 2020. We had $388.5 million and $512.3 million of brokered deposits at June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively. Both consumer and commercial deposit balances have grown since the COVID-19 related economic stimulus legislation, including legislation that established the PPP program, was implemented in mid-2020. We are managing our balance sheet and our net interest margin by continuing to eliminate several high-cost deposits related to public funds and brokered deposits.

OTHER BORROWINGS AND SUBORDINATED NOTES AND DEBENTURES
 
Our total debt was $1.72 billion at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The outstanding balance for June 30, 2021 includes $1.3 billion in FHLB long-term advances; $330.0 million in subordinated notes; $53.1 million of trust preferred securities and unamortized debt issuance costs; and $32.6 million of other long-term debt.

The FHLB long-term advances outstanding at the end of the second quarter 2021 are primarily FOTO advances which are a low cost, fixed-rate source of funding in return for granting to FHLB the flexibility to choose a termination date earlier than the maturity date. Our FOTO advances outstanding at June 30, 2021 had original maturity dates of 10 years to 15 years with lockout periods that have expired. We expect the FHLB to not exercise the options to terminate the FOTO advances prior to their stated maturity dates due to the current low interest rate environment. We continually analyze the possibility of the FHLB exercising the options along with the market expected rate outcome. As of June 30, 2021, there were no FHLB short-term advances outstanding.

In March 2018, we issued $330 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes (“Notes”) at a public offering price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes. The Company incurred $3.6 million in debt issuance costs related to the offering. The Notes will mature on April 1, 2028 and are subordinated in right of payment to the payment of our other existing and future senior indebtedness, including all our general creditors. The Notes are obligations of the Company only and are not obligations of, and are not guaranteed by, any of its subsidiaries.

65




CAPITAL
 
Overview
 
At June 30, 2021, total capital was $3.04 billion. Capital represents shareholder ownership in the Company – the book value of assets in excess of liabilities. At June 30, 2021, our common equity to asset ratio was 12.97% compared to 13.31% at year-end 2020.

Capital Stock
 
On February 27, 2009, at a special meeting, our shareholders approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to establish 40,040,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value. The aggregate liquidation preference of all shares of preferred stock cannot exceed $80,000,000.
 
On October 29, 2019, we filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (“October Amended Articles”) with the Arkansas Secretary of State. The October Amended Articles classified and designated Series D Preferred Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share, out of our authorized preferred stock.

Stock Repurchase Program

Effective July 23, 2021, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s current stock repurchase program (“Program”) that increases the amount of our common stock that may be repurchased under the Program from a maximum of $180 million to a maximum of $276.5 million and extends the term of the Program from October 31, 2021, to October 31, 2022 (unless terminated sooner). The Program was originally approved on October 17, 2019 and first amended in March 2020.

Under the Program, we may repurchase shares of our common stock through open market and privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The timing, pricing, and amount of any repurchases under the Program will be determined by management at its discretion based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, trading volume and market price of our common stock, corporate considerations, our working capital and investment requirements, general market and economic conditions, and legal requirements. The Program does not obligate us to repurchase any common stock and may be modified, discontinued, or suspended at any time without prior notice. We anticipate funding for this Program to come from available sources of liquidity, including cash on hand and future cash flow.

During the six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, we repurchased 130,916 shares at an average price per share of $23.53 and 4,922,336 shares at an average price per share of $18.96, respectively, under the Program. No shares were repurchased under the Program during the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.

Cash Dividends
 
We declared cash dividends on our common stock of $0.36 per share for the first six months of 2021 compared to $0.34 per share for the first six months of 2020, an increase of $0.02, or 6%. The timing and amount of future dividends are at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our consolidated earnings, financial condition, liquidity and capital requirements, the amount of cash dividends paid to us by our subsidiaries, applicable government regulations and policies and other factors considered relevant by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors anticipates that we will continue to pay quarterly dividends in amounts determined based on the factors discussed above. However, there can be no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends on our common stock at the current levels or at all.

Parent Company Liquidity
 
The primary liquidity needs of the Parent Company are the payment of dividends to shareholders, the funding of debt obligations and cash needs for acquisitions. The primary sources for meeting these liquidity needs are the current cash on hand at the parent company and the future dividends received from Simmons Bank. Payment of dividends by Simmons Bank is subject to various regulatory limitations. See the Liquidity and Market Risk Management discussions of Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for additional information regarding the parent company’s liquidity. The Company continually assesses its capital and liquidity needs and the best way to meet them, including, without limitation, through capital raising in the market via stock or debt offerings.
 
66




Risk Based Capital
 
The Company and Simmons Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. The Company and Simmons Bank, must hold a capital conservation buffer composed of common equity Tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements. Failure to meet this capital conservation buffer would result in additional limits on dividends, other distributions and discretionary bonuses.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total, Tier 1 and common equity Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes that, as of June 30, 2021, we meet all capital adequacy requirements to which we are subject. As of the most recent notification from regulatory agencies, Simmons Bank was well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company and Simmons Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, common equity Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s categories.

Our risk-based capital ratios at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are presented in Table 12 below:
 
Table 12: Risk-Based Capital
June 30,December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20212020
Tier 1 capital:  
Stockholders’ equity$3,039,366 $2,976,656 
CECL transition provision128,933 131,430 
Goodwill and other intangible assets(1,156,203)(1,163,797)
Unrealized loss (gain) on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes(12,073)(59,726)
Total Tier 1 capital2,000,023 1,884,563 
Tier 2 capital:
Trust preferred securities and subordinated debt383,143 382,874 
Qualifying allowance for credit losses and reserve for unfunded commitments79,138 89,546 
Total Tier 2 capital462,281 472,420 
Total risk-based capital$2,462,304 $2,356,983 
Risk weighted assets$14,076,975 $14,048,608 
Assets for leverage ratio$22,244,118 $20,765,127 
Ratios at end of period:
Common equity Tier 1 ratio (CET1)14.20 %13.41 %
Tier 1 leverage ratio8.99 %9.08 %
Tier 1 leverage ratio, excluding average PPP loans (non-GAAP)(1)
9.29 %9.50 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio14.21 %13.41 %
Total risk-based capital ratio17.49 %16.78 %
Minimum guidelines:
Common equity Tier 1 ratio (CET1)4.50 %4.50 %
Tier 1 leverage ratio4.00 %4.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio6.00 %6.00 %
Total risk-based capital ratio8.00 %8.00 %
_______________________________________
(1)PPP loans are 100% federally guaranteed and have a zero percent risk-weight for regulatory capital ratios. Tier 1 leverage ratio, excluding average PPP loans is a non-GAAP measurement.

67




Regulatory Capital Changes
 
In December 2018, the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) (collectively, the “agencies”) issued a final rule revising regulatory capital rules in anticipation of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 that provided an option to phase in over a three year period on a straight line basis the day-one impact of the adoption on earnings and Tier 1 capital (the “CECL Transition Provision”).

In March 2020 and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the agencies issued a new regulatory capital rule revising the CECL Transition Provision to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of ASU 2016-13. The rule provides banking organizations that implement CECL before the end of 2020 the option to delay for two years an estimate of CECL’s effect on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period (the “2020 CECL Transition Provision”). The Company elected to apply the 2020 CECL Transition Provision.

In July 2013, the Company’s primary federal regulator, the Federal Reserve, published final rules (the “Basel III Capital Rules”) establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banks. The rules implement the Basel Committee’s December 2010 framework known as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards. The Basel III Capital Rules introduced substantial revisions to the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and depository institutions.
 
The Basel III Capital Rules define the components of capital and address other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios. The rules also address risk weights and other issues affecting the denominator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios and replace the existing risk-weighting approach with a more risk-sensitive approach.
 
The Basel III Capital Rules expanded the risk-weighting categories from four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity exposures, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories, including many residential mortgages and certain commercial real estate.
 
The final rules included a new common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. The rules also raised the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% and require a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for the Company and its subsidiary bank on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements on January 1, 2019.

Prior to December 31, 2017, Tier 1 capital included common equity Tier 1 capital and certain additional Tier 1 items as provided under the Basel III Capital Rules. The Tier 1 capital for the Company consisted of common equity Tier 1 capital and trust preferred securities. The Basel III Capital Rules include certain provisions that require trust preferred securities to be phased out of qualifying Tier 1 capital when assets surpass $15 billion. As of December 31, 2017, the Company exceeded $15 billion in total assets and the grandfather provisions applicable to its trust preferred securities no longer apply and trust preferred securities are no longer included as Tier 1 capital. Trust preferred securities and qualifying subordinated debt of $383.1 million is included as Tier 2 and total capital as of June 30, 2021.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
See the Recently Issued Accounting Standards section in Note 1, Preparation of Interim Financial Statements, in the accompanying Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for details of recently issued accounting pronouncements and their expected impact on the Company’s ongoing financial position and results of operation.
 
68




CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
Certain statements contained in this quarterly report may not be based on historical facts and should be considered “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period(s) or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “budget,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “foresee,” “intend,” “indicate,” “target,” “plan,” positions,” “prospects,” “project,” “predict,” or “potential,” by future conditional verbs such as “could,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “will,” or “would,” or by variations of such words or by similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those relating to the Company’s future growth, pending acquisitions, revenue, expenses, assets, asset quality, profitability, earnings, accretion, customer service, lending capacity and lending activity, investment in digital channels, critical accounting policies, net interest margin, non-interest revenue, market conditions related to and the impact of the Company’s stock repurchase program, consumer behavior and liquidity, the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ability of the Company to manage the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the impacts of the Company’s and its customers’ participation in the Paycheck Protection Program, the expected performance of COVID-19 loan modifications, income tax deductions, credit quality, the level of credit losses from lending commitments, net interest revenue, interest rate sensitivity, loan loss experience, liquidity, the Company’s expectations regarding actions by the FHLB including with respect to the FHLB’s option to terminate FOTO advances, capital resources, market risk, plans for investments in securities, effect of future litigation, including the results of the overdraft fee litigation against the Company that is described in this quarterly report, acquisition strategy and activity, legal and regulatory limitations and compliance and competition.
 
These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: changes in the Company’s operating, acquisition, or expansion strategy; the effects of future economic conditions (including unemployment levels and slowdowns in economic growth), governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes, including in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations and performance; the ultimate effect of measures the Company takes or has taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the effectiveness of vaccination efforts and developments with respect to COVID-19 variants; the pace of recovery when the COVID-19 pandemic subsides and the heightened impact it has on many of the risks described herein; changes in real estate values; changes in interest rates; changes in the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, and the values of loan collateral, securities and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; changes in the securities markets generally or the price of the Company’s common stock specifically; developments in information technology affecting the financial industry; cyber threats, attacks or events; reliance on third parties for the provision of key services; further changes in accounting principles relating to loan loss recognition; uncertainty and disruption associated with the discontinued use of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate; the costs of evaluating possible acquisitions and the risks inherent in integrating acquisitions; possible adverse rulings, judgements, settlements, and other outcomes of pending or future litigation, including litigation or actions arising from the Company’s participation in and administration of programs related to the COVID-19 pandemic (including, among others, the PPP); the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the internet; the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible credit losses, fair value for loans, other real estate owned, and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in this report. Please also refer to the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of this quarterly report and the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, and related disclosures in other filings, which have been filed with the SEC and are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to predict or control, and actual results could differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements due to these factors and others. In addition, as a result of these and other factors, our past financial performance should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.
 
We believe the assumptions and expectations that underlie or are reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, based on information available to us on the date hereof. However, given the described uncertainties and risks, we cannot guarantee our future performance or results of operations or whether our future performance will differ materially from the performance reflected in or implied by our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, and all written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this section.

69




GAAP RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
 
The tables below present computations of core earnings (net income excluding non-core items {gain on sale of branches, merger related costs, early retirement program costs and the net branch right sizing costs}) (non-GAAP) and core diluted earnings per share (non-GAAP) as well as a computation of tangible book value per share (non-GAAP), tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP), the core net interest margin (non-GAAP), core other income (non-GAAP) and core non-interest expense (non-GAAP). Non-core items are included in financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP). The tables below also present computations of certain figures that are exclusive of the impact of PPP loans: the ratios of common equity to total assets and tangible common equity to tangible assets, each adjusted for PPP loans (each non-GAAP), Tier 1 leverage ratio excluding average PPP loans (non-GAAP), and net interest income and net interest margin, each adjusted for PPP loans and additional liquidity (each non-GAAP).
 
We believe the exclusion of these non-core items in expressing earnings and certain other financial measures, including “core earnings,” provides a meaningful basis for period-to-period and company-to-company comparisons, which management believes will assist investors and analysts in analyzing the core financial measures of the Company and predicting future performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are also used by management to assess the performance of the Company’s business because management does not consider these non-core items to be relevant to ongoing financial performance. Management and the Board of Directors utilize “core earnings” (non-GAAP) for the following purposes:
 
•   Preparation of the Company’s operating budgets
•   Monthly financial performance reporting
•   Monthly “flash” reporting of consolidated results (management only)
•   Investor presentations of Company performance
 
We believe the presentation of “core earnings” on a diluted per share basis, “core diluted earnings per share” (non-GAAP) and core net interest margin (non-GAAP), provides a meaningful basis for period-to-period and company-to-company comparisons, which management believes will assist investors and analysts in analyzing the core financial measures of the Company and predicting future performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are also used by management to assess the performance of the Company’s business, because management does not consider these non-core items to be relevant to ongoing financial performance on a per share basis. Management and the Board of Directors utilize “core diluted earnings per share” (non-GAAP) for the following purposes:
 
•   Calculation of annual performance-based incentives for certain executives
•   Calculation of long-term performance-based incentives for certain executives
•   Investor presentations of Company performance
 
We have $1.179 billion and $1.186 billion total goodwill and other intangible assets for the periods ended June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Because our acquisition strategy has resulted in a high level of intangible assets, management believes useful calculations include tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) and tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP).

We believe the exclusion of PPP loans or their impact, as applicable, in expressing earnings and certain other financial measures provides a meaningful basis for period-to-period and company-to-company comparisons because PPP loans are 100% federally guaranteed and have very low interest rates. The Company’s non-GAAP financial measures that exclude PPP loans or their impact include the ratios of “common equity to total assets” and “tangible common equity to tangible assets,” each adjusted for PPP loans (each non-GAAP), “Tier 1 leverage ratio excluding average PPP loans” (non-GAAP), and “net interest margin,” adjusted for PPP loans and additional liquidity (non-GAAP). Additional liquidity is defined as average interest-bearing balances due from banks greater than normal liquidity levels. Management believes these non-GAAP presentations will assist investors and analysts in analyzing the core financial measures of the Company, including the performance of the Company’s loan portfolio and the Company’s regulatory capital position, and predicting future performance. Management and the Board of Directors utilize these non-GAAP financial measures for financial performance reporting and investor presentations of Company performance.

We believe that presenting these non-GAAP financial measures will permit investors and analysts to assess the performance of the Company on the same basis as that is applied by management and the Board of Directors.
 

70




Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, we have procedures in place to identify and approve each item that qualifies as non-core to ensure that the Company’s “core” results are properly reflected for period-to-period comparisons. Although these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company, they have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP. In particular, a measure of earnings that excludes non-core items does not represent the amount that effectively accrues directly to stockholders (i.e., non-core items are included in earnings and stockholders’ equity). Additionally, similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies may not be computed in the same or similar fashion.

See Table 13 below for the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures, which exclude non-core items for the periods presented.
 
Table 13: Reconciliation of Core Earnings (non-GAAP) 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)2021202020212020
Net income available to common stockholders$74,911 $58,789 $142,318 $136,012 
Non-core items:
Gain on sale of branches(445)(2,204)(5,922)(8,093)
Merger related costs686 1,830 919 2,898 
Early retirement program— 493 — 493 
Branch right sizing468 1,721 1,093 1,959 
Tax effect (1)
(185)(482)1,022 716 
Net non-core items524 1,358 (2,888)(2,027)
Core earnings (non-GAAP)$75,435 $60,147 $139,430 $133,985 
Diluted earnings per share(2)
$0.69 $0.54 $1.31 $1.22 
Non-core items:
Gain on sale of branches(0.01)(0.02)(0.06)(0.07)
Merger related costs0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 
Branch right sizing— 0.02 0.01 0.02 
Tax effect (1)
— (0.01)0.01 0.01 
Net non-core items— 0.01 (0.03)(0.01)
Core diluted earnings per share (non-GAAP)$0.69 $0.55 $1.28 $1.21 
_______________________________________
(1)Effective tax rate of 26.135%.
(2)See Note 17, Earnings Per Share, for number of shares used to determine EPS.


71




See Table 14 below for the reconciliation of core other income and core non-interest expense for the periods presented.
 
Table 14: Reconciliation of Core Other Income and Core Non-Interest Expense (non-GAAP) 

 Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(In thousands)2021202020212020
Other income$8,110 $9,809 $18,370 $22,610 
Gain on sale of branches(445)(2,204)(5,922)(8,093)
Core other income (non-GAAP)$7,665 $7,605 $12,448 $14,517 
Non-interest expense$115,466 $116,177 $229,259 $243,641 
Non-core items:
Merger related costs(686)(1,830)(919)(2,898)
Early retirement program— (493)— (493)
Branch right sizing(468)(1,721)(1,093)(1,959)
Total non-core items(1,154)(4,044)(2,012)(5,350)
Core non-interest expense (non-GAAP)$114,312 $112,133 $227,247 $238,291 


See Table 15 below for the reconciliation of tangible book value per common share.
 
Table 15: Reconciliation of Tangible Book Value per Common Share (non-GAAP) 
June 30,December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)20212020
Total stockholders’ equity$3,039,366 $2,976,656 
Preferred stock(767)(767)
Total common stockholders’ equity3,038,599 2,975,889 
Intangible assets:
Goodwill(1,075,305)(1,075,305)
Other intangible assets(103,759)(111,110)
Total intangibles(1,179,064)(1,186,415)
Tangible common stockholders’ equity$1,859,535 $1,789,474 
Shares of common stock outstanding108,386,669 108,077,662 
Book value per common share$28.03 $27.53 
Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP)$17.16 $16.56 


72




See Table 16 below for the calculation of tangible common equity and the reconciliation of tangible common equity to tangible assets.
 
Table 16: Reconciliation of Tangible Common Equity and the Ratio of Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets (non-GAAP)
 
June 30,December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20212020
Total common stockholders’ equity$3,038,599 $2,975,889 
Intangible assets:
Goodwill(1,075,305)(1,075,305)
Other intangible assets(103,759)(111,110)
Total intangibles(1,179,064)(1,186,415)
Tangible common stockholders’ equity$1,859,535 $1,789,474 
Total assets$23,423,159 $22,359,752 
Intangible assets:
Goodwill(1,075,305)(1,075,305)
Other intangible assets(103,759)(111,110)
Total intangibles(1,179,064)(1,186,415)
Tangible assets$22,244,095 $21,173,337 
Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans(441,353)(904,673)
Total assets excluding PPP loans$22,981,806 $21,455,079 
Tangible assets excluding PPP loans$21,802,742 $20,268,664 
Ratio of common equity to assets12.97 %13.31 %
Ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP)8.36 %8.45 %
Ratio of common equity to assets excluding PPP loans (non-GAAP)13.22 %13.87 %
Ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets excluding PPP loans (non-GAAP)8.53 %8.83 %


See Table 17 below for the calculation of Tier 1 leverage ratio excluding average PPP loans for the period presented.
 
Table 17: Reconciliation of Tier 1 Leverage Ratio Excluding Average PPP Loans (non-GAAP)

(Dollars in thousands)Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021
Total Tier 1 capital$2,000,023 
Adjusted average assets for leverage ratio$22,244,118 
Average PPP loans(707,296)
Adjusted average assets excluding average PPP loans$21,536,822 
Tier 1 leverage ratio8.99 %
Tier 1 leverage ratio excluding average PPP loans (non-GAAP)9.29 %


73




See Table 18 below for the calculation of core net interest margin and net interest margin adjusted for PPP loans and additional liquidity for the periods presented.
 
Table 18: Reconciliation of Core Net Interest Margin (non-GAAP)
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2021202020212020
Net interest income$146,533 $163,681 $293,214 $331,164 
FTE adjustment4,548 2,350 8,711 4,655 
Fully tax equivalent net interest income151,081 166,031 301,925 335,819 
Total accretable yield(5,619)(11,723)(12,249)(23,560)
Core net interest income$145,462 $154,308 $289,676 $312,259 
PPP loan and additional liquidity (1) interest income
(9,445)(5,623)(21,694)
Net interest income adjusted for PPP loans and additional liquidity (1)
$141,636 $160,408 $280,231 
Average earning assets$20,959,642 $19,517,475 $20,723,587 $19,049,487 
Average PPP loan balance and additional liquidity (1)
(2,659,831)(2,071,411)3,139,749 
Average earning assets adjusted for PPP loans and additional liquidity (1)
$18,299,811 $17,446,064 $23,863,336 
Net interest margin2.89 %3.42 %2.94 %3.55 %
Core net interest margin (non-GAAP)2.78 %3.18 %2.82 %3.30 %
Net interest margin adjusted for PPP loans and additional liquidity (1) (non-GAAP)
3.10 %3.70 %3.21 %
_______________________________________
(1)Additional liquidity is estimated as the average interest bearing balances due from banks and federal funds sold greater than $750.0 million.






74




Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
The Company has leveraged its investment in its subsidiary bank and depends upon the dividends paid to it, as the sole shareholder of the subsidiary bank, as a principal source of funds for dividends to shareholders, stock repurchases and debt service requirements. At June 30, 2021, undivided profits of Simmons Bank were approximately $462.9 million, of which approximately $99.3 million was available for the payment of dividends to the Company without regulatory approval. In addition to dividends, other sources of liquidity for the Company are the sale of equity securities and the borrowing of funds.
 
Subsidiary Bank
 
Generally speaking, the Company’s subsidiary bank relies upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash used in investing activities. Typical of most banking companies, significant financing activities include: deposit gathering; use of short-term borrowing facilities, such as federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements; and the issuance of long-term debt. The subsidiary bank’s primary investing activities include loan originations and purchases of investment securities, offset by loan payoffs and investment cash flows and maturities.
 
Liquidity represents an institution’s ability to provide funds to satisfy demands from depositors and borrowers by either converting assets into cash or accessing new or existing sources of incremental funds. A major responsibility of management is to maximize net interest income within prudent liquidity constraints. Internal corporate guidelines have been established to constantly measure liquid assets as well as relevant ratios concerning earning asset levels and purchased funds. The management and Board of Directors of the subsidiary bank monitors these same indicators and makes adjustments as needed.
 
Liquidity Management
 
The objective of our liquidity management is to access adequate sources of funding to ensure that cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers are met in an orderly and timely manner. Sources of liquidity are managed so that reliance on any one funding source is kept to a minimum. Our liquidity sources are prioritized for both availability and time to activation.
 
Our liquidity is a primary consideration in determining funding needs and is an integral part of asset/liability management. Pricing of the liability side is a major component of interest margin and spread management. Adequate liquidity is a necessity in addressing this critical task. There are seven primary and secondary sources of liquidity available to the Company. The particular liquidity need and timeframe determine the use of these sources.
 
The first source of liquidity available to the Company is federal funds. Federal funds are available on a daily basis and are used to meet the normal fluctuations of a dynamic balance sheet. The Bank has approximately $415 million in federal funds lines of credit from upstream correspondent banks that can be accessed, when needed. In order to ensure availability of these upstream funds we test these borrowing lines at least annually. Historical monitoring of these funds has made it possible for us to project seasonal fluctuations and structure our funding requirements on a month-to-month basis.

Second, Simmons Bank has lines of credit available with the Federal Home Loan Bank. While we use portions of those lines to match off longer-term mortgage loans, we also use those lines to meet liquidity needs. Approximately $3.5 billion of these lines of credit are currently available, if needed, for liquidity.
 
A third source of liquidity is that we have the ability to access large wholesale deposits from both the public and private sector to fund short-term liquidity needs.
 
A fourth source of liquidity is the retail deposits available through our network of financial centers throughout Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. Although this method can be a somewhat more expensive alternative to supplying liquidity, this source can be used to meet intermediate term liquidity needs.
 
Fifth, we use a laddered investment portfolio that ensures there is a steady source of intermediate term liquidity. These funds can be used to meet seasonal loan patterns and other intermediate term balance sheet fluctuations. Approximately 87.6% of the investment portfolio is classified as available-for-sale. We also use securities held in the securities portfolio to pledge when obtaining public funds.

Sixth, we have a network of downstream correspondent banks from which we can access debt to meet liquidity needs.
 
Finally, we have the ability to access funds through the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window.

75




We believe the various sources available are ample liquidity for short-term, intermediate-term and long-term liquidity.

Market Risk Management
 
Market risk arises from changes in interest rates. We have risk management policies to monitor and limit exposure to market risk. In asset and liability management activities, policies designed to minimize structural interest rate risk are in place. The measurement of market risk associated with financial instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting on- and off-balance-sheet transactions are aggregated, and the resulting net positions are identified.
 
Interest Rate Sensitivity
 
Interest rate risk represents the potential impact of interest rate changes on net income and capital resulting from mismatches in repricing opportunities of assets and liabilities over a period of time. A number of tools are used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, including simulation models and interest sensitivity gap analysis. Management uses simulation models to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and various balance sheet strategies on the level of the Company’s net income and capital. As a means of limiting interest rate risk to an acceptable level, management may alter the mix of floating and fixed-rate assets and liabilities, change pricing schedules and manage investment maturities during future security purchases, or enter into derivative contracts such as interest rate swaps.
 
The simulation model incorporates management’s assumptions regarding the level of interest rates or balance changes for indeterminate maturity deposits for a given level of market rate changes. These assumptions have been developed through anticipated pricing behavior. Key assumptions in the simulation models include the relative timing of prepayments, cash flows and maturities. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or precisely predict the impact of a change in interest rates on net income or capital. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes and changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors.
 
As of June 30, 2021, the model simulations projected that 100 and 200 basis point increases in interest rates would result in a positive variance in net interest income of 4.53% and 9.52%, respectively, relative to the base case over the next 12 months, while decreases in interest rates of 25 basis points would result in a negative variance in net interest income of (0.67)% relative to the base case over the next 12 months. The likelihood of a decrease in interest rates in excess of 25 basis points as of June 30, 2021, is considered remote given current interest rate levels. These are good faith estimates and assume that the composition of our interest sensitive assets and liabilities existing at each period-end will remain constant over the relevant twelve month measurement period and that changes in market interest rates are instantaneous and sustained across the yield curve regardless of duration of pricing characteristics of specific assets or liabilities. Also, this analysis does not contemplate any actions that we might undertake in response to changes in market interest rates. We believe these estimates are not necessarily indicative of what actually could occur in the event of immediate interest rate increases or decreases of this magnitude. As interest-bearing assets and liabilities reprice in different time frames and proportions to market interest rate movements, various assumptions must be made based on historical relationships of these variables in reaching any conclusion. Since these correlations are based on competitive and market conditions, we anticipate that our future results will likely be different from the foregoing estimates, and such differences could be material.
 
The table below presents our sensitivity to net interest income at June 30, 2021: 
 
Table 19: Net Interest Income Sensitivity
 
Interest Rate Scenario% Change from Base
Up 200 basis points9.52%
Up 100 basis points4.53%
Down 25 basis points(0.67)%

76




Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
 
Management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, has reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover every situation involving the failure of persons within the Company or its subsidiary to disclose material information required to be set forth in the Company’s periodic reports.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2021, which materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Part II:    Other Information

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

The information contained in Note 13, Contingent Liabilities, of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A.     Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors faced by the Company from those disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (“2020 Form 10-K”).
 
Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Effective July 23, 2021, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s current stock repurchase program (“Program”) that increases the amount of our common stock that may be repurchased under the Program from a maximum of $180 million to a maximum of $276.5 million and extends the term of the Program from October 31, 2021, to October 31, 2022 (unless terminated sooner). The Program was originally approved on October 17, 2019 and first amended in March 2020. The timing, pricing, and amount of any repurchases under the Program will be determined by management at its discretion based on a variety of factors, including but not limited to, trading volume and market price of our common stock, corporate considerations, our working capital and investment requirements, general market and economic conditions, and legal requirements.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2021, we repurchased restricted stock in connection with employee tax withholding obligations under employee compensation plans. Information concerning our purchases of common stock is as follows:
Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
Average Price Paid per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or ProgramsApproximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1, 2021 - April 30, 2021— $— — $53,463,000 
May 1, 2021 - May 31, 2021143 29.99 — $53,463,000 
June 1, 2021 - June 30, 2021— — — $53,463,000 
Total143 $29.99 — 
_______________________________________
(1)Total number of shares purchased consists of 143 shares with an average price $29.99 of restricted stock purchased in connection with employee tax withholding obligations under employee compensation plans, which are not purchases under any publicly announced plan.
77




Item 6.     Exhibits
Exhibit No.Description
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Simmons First National Corporation, as amended on July 14, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed under the Securities Act of 1933 by Simmons First National Corporation on July 21, 2021 (File No. 333-258059)).
As Amended By-Laws of Simmons First National Corporation, as amended on October 21, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Simmons First National Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 22, 2020 (File No. 000-06253)).
4.1Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures. Simmons First National Corporation hereby agrees to furnish copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. No issuance of debt exceeds ten percent of the total assets of the Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
Amended and Restated Simmons First National Corporation Code of Ethics (as amended and restated on July 23, 2020) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to Simmons First National Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 28, 2020 (File No. 000-06253)).
Awareness Letter of BKD, LLP.*
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification – George A. Makris, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.*
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification – James M. Brogdon, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer.*
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification – David W. Garner, Executive Vice President, Executive Director of Finance and Accounting and Chief Accounting Officer.*
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – George A. Makris, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.*
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – James M. Brogdon, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer.*
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – David W. Garner, Executive Vice President, Executive Director of Finance and Accounting and Chief Accounting Officer.*
101.INSXBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase.
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
* Filed herewith
 

78




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)

 
Date:August 6, 2021/s/ George A. Makris, Jr.
 George A. Makris, Jr.
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  
  
Date:August 6, 2021/s/ James M. Brogdon
 James M. Brogdon
 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
Date:August 6, 2021/s/ David W. Garner
David W. Garner
Executive Vice President, Executive Director of Finance and
Accounting and Chief Accounting Officer

79