SITO MOBILE, LTD. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X]Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [X] Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company; as defined within Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

[ ] Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [X] Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[ ] Yes [X] No

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity as of June 30, 2010: 119,252,313 shares of common stock

1

2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

5

SINGLE TOUCH SYSTEMS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 612,500 common shares in cancellation of professional and consulting fees totaling $368,304. The shares were valued at their respective market value on date of issuance and the Company recognized a loss on the settlement of debt in the amount of $97,977.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued a total of 28,993,896 common shares in cancellation of convertible debt which had matured totaling $2,319,512. The holders included the Company's President who received 13,773,992 of the total shares issued.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued a total of 918,063 common shares to the Company's President's wholly owned company in cancellation of convertible debt due it totaling $73,445.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to its President and his wholly owned company evidencing the remaining balances due for loans, accrued interest and accrued compensation totaling $789,182. The Company also recorded a discount on these two notes of $789,182 for the beneficial conversion features of these notes. The $789,182 was credited to equity.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 1,607,521 shares in cancellation of notes payable and related accrued interest due third parties totaling $596,346. The shares were valued at their respective trading price on the date of issuance and the Company recognized a loss on the settlement of debt in the amount of $1,831,011.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a $500,000 discount related to the beneficial conversion feature of the underlying convertible note (see Note 9).

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 22,529,919 shares of its common stock for $10,192,004 in cash.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock to a Director through the exercise of a warrant. The shares were issued for $1,000 in cash.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company paid $134,320 and granted warrants to purchase 1,155,814 shares of the Company's common stock at $1 per share in connection with the Company's private stock offerings. The Company valued the warrants at their respective market value on the date of the respective grants totaling $558,200. In addition, the Company accrued an additional $137,500 for fees due on its June 2010 share offerings. The total offering costs of $823,145 were offset against the proceeds received from the offerings. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company charged $1,045,930 to equity relating to the amortization of discounts on related party convertible debt (see Note 8).

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company acquired patents and patent applications from an unrelated third party for a total of $831,394 including the down payment of $550,000.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

6

SINGLE TOUCH SYSTEMS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

In October 2008, the Company granted a warrant to an advisor for services. The warrant allows the advisor to purchase the greater of 5,952,362 common shares or 5.2% of the outstanding common shares of the Company, calculated on a fully dilutive basis. The terms also allow for a cashless exercise. The warrant was originally valued at $13,831,504 and capitalized as a prepaid expense. It is being charged to operations over the one year term of the consulting agreement. Based upon the terms of the warrant, the Company considers it to be a derivative and is including the fair value of the warrant in its liabilities (see Note 8).

During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, the Company charged $862,786 to equity relating to the amortization of discounts on related party convertible debt (see Note 8).

During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock through the exercise of warrants. The total exercise price amounted to $150.

In June 2009, the Company issued 3,666,667 shares of its common stock and granted warrants to purchase 1,833,334 shares of its common stock in consideration for patents and other intellectual property. The property was valued at the fair value of the shares issued and warrants granted totaling $5,470,851. Of this total, $200,000 was capitalized as patent costs and the remaining $5,270,851 was expensed as research and development fees (see Note 7).

In June 2009, the Company entered into a loan extension with Fort Ashford, As part of the consideration for the extension, the loan balance was increased by $25,000. The Company accounted for the $25,000 increase as a deferred loan fee which is being amortized over the extended life of the loan (see Note 11).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

7

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

8

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable is reported at the customers’ outstanding balances less any allowance for doubtful accounts. Interest is not accrued on overdue accounts receivable.

An allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable is charged to operations in amounts sufficient to maintain the allowance for uncollectible accounts at a level management believes is adequate to cover any probable losses. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on historical write-off percentages and information collected from individual customers. Accounts receivable are charged off against the allowance when collectability is determined to be permanently impaired. As of June 30, 2010, the Company established an allowance for doubtful accounts totaling $54,084.

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Major renewals and improvements are charged to the asset accounts while replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed. At the time property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the asset and related accumulated depreciation accounts are relieved of the applicable amounts. Gains or losses from retirements or sales are credited or charged to income.

Depreciation is computed on the straight-line and accelerated methods for financial reporting and income tax reporting purposes based upon the following estimated useful lives:

The Company accounts for its long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-05, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” ASC Topic 360-10-05 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the historical cost carrying value of an asset may no longer be appropriate. The Company assesses recoverability of the carrying value of an asset by estimating the future net cash flows expected to result from the asset, including eventual disposition. If the future net cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the difference between the asset’s carrying value and fair value or disposable value. At June 30, 2010, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $53,999 pertaining to certain abandoned software development costs.

The Company’s agreements with licensors and developers generally provide it with exclusive publishing rights and require it to make advance royalty payments that are recouped against royalties due to the licensor or developer based on product sales. Prepaid royalties are amortized on a software application-by-application basis, based on the greater of the proportion of current year sales to total current and estimated future sales or the contractual royalty rate based on actual net product sales. The Company continually evaluates the recoverability of prepaid royalties, and charges to operations the amount that management determines is probable that will not be recouped at the contractual royalty rate in the period in which such determination is made or at the time the Company determines that it will cancel a development project. Prepaid royalties are classified as current and non-current assets based upon estimated net product sales within the next year.

The Company capitalizes internal software development costs subsequent to establishing technological feasibility of a software application. Capitalized software development costs represent the costs associated with the internal development of the Company’s software applications. Amortization of such costs is recorded on a software application-by-application basis, based on the greater of the proportion of current year sales to total of current and estimated future sales for the applications or the straight-line method over the remaining estimated useful life of the software application. The Company continually evaluates the recoverability of capitalized software costs and will charge to operations amounts that are deemed unrecoverable for projects it abandons.

9

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

All issuances of the Company’s stock for non-cash consideration have been assigned a dollar amount equaling the market value of the shares issued on the date the shares were issued for such services. The non-cash consideration received pertains to consulting services.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under ACS Topic 505-50, formerly SFAS No. 123R, "Share-Based Payment” and SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - An amendment to SFAS No. 123.” These standards define a fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. In accordance with SFAS Nos. 123R and 148, the cost of stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the vesting period. The value of the stock-based award is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, whereby compensation cost is the excess of the fair value of the award as determined by the pricing model at the grant date or other measurement date over the amount that must be paid to acquire the stock. The resulting amount is charged to expense on the straight-line basis over the period in which the Company expects to receive the benefit, which is generally the vesting period. During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $0 and $3,457,846 from the granting of a common stock warrant to an advisor. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $1,152,625 and $9,221,002 from the granting of a common stock warrant to an advisor.

The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260-10, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been presented since the effect of the assumed conversion of warrants and debt to purchase common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. Potential common shares as of June 30, 2010 that have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share include 38,219,293 warrants, 8,675,000 options, and $1,289,182 of debt convertible into 3,484,276 shares of the Company’s common stock. Potential common shares as of June 30, 2009 that have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share were 33,113,934 warrants and $2,392,957 of debt convertible into 29,911,963 shares of the Company’s common stock. If such shares were included in diluted EPS, they would have resulted in weighted-average common shares of 125,408,456 and 122,412,447 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and weighted average common shares of 81,476,116 and 121,225,305 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

For purpose of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers cash and cash equivalents to include all stable, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less.

The Company primarily transacts its business with one financial institution. The amount on deposit in that one institution may from time-to-time exceed the federally insured limit.

During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, significantly all of the Company’s revenue was generated from contracts with eight customers. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, significantly all of the Company’s revenue was generated from contracts with ten customers.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affects the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

If the conversion feature of conventional convertible debt provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by the Company as a debt discount pursuant to ASC Topic 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” In those circumstances, the convertible debt is recorded net of the discount related to the BCF and the Company amortizes the discount to interest expense or equity (if the debt is due to a related party), over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

10

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

The Company accounts for its income taxes under the provisions of ASC Topic 740 ”Income Taxes” (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 109). The method of accounting for income taxes under ASC 740 is an asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between tax bases and financial reporting bases of other assets and liabilities.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605). ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on applying the milestone method of revenue recognition in arrangements with research and development activities. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on its revenue recognition when adopted for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2011.

In March 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-11 (ASU 2010-11), “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” The amendments in this Update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this Update. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-11 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In February 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10), “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds.” The amendments in this Update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within that first reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Company’s adoption of provisions of ASU 2010-10 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855) “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU No. 2010-09”). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements and employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a

Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $22,630 and $20,894, respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $71,585 and $62,682, respectively.

11

SINGLE TOUCH SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

5. Capitalized Software Development Costs

The following is a summary of capitalized software development costs at June 30, 2010:

Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $156,126 and $105,236, respectively. Amortization expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $346,084 and $493,485, respectively. During the nine-months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $53,999 on abandoned software. Amortization expense for the remaining estimated lives of these costs are as follows:

On June 2, 2009, the Company entered into an Intellectual Property Rights Purchase and Transfer Agreement (“Agreement”) with Streamworks Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Streamworks”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company acquired a portfolio of sixteen patents and patent applications related primarily to the management, streaming and routing of electronic media. In consideration for the portfolio, Streamworks received 3,666,667 common shares of the Company and warrants to purchase 1,833,334 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.30 per share for a period of two years.

In addition, non-compete agreements were provided to the Company by certain management of Streamworks and the Company provided Streamworks with registration rights covering the common shares issued pursuant to the agreement. The Company valued the intellectual property at the fair value of the common shares and warrants provided totaling $5,470,851. The property purchased has not reached technological feasibility. Therefore, the Company valued the technology at its estimated fair value of $104,418 and recognized an impairment loss during the year ended September 30, 2009 of $5,366,433. The Company is amortizing the technology’s estimated fair value of $104,418 over its seven year estimated life. The Company incurred additional legal fees associated with the patent applications during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 of $23,609. Costs associated with patent applications are not being amortized. Upon the issuance of a patent, its respective cost will be amortized over the patent’s estimated useful life. Costs associated with abandoned applications are charged to operations. On March 30, 2010, the Company was issued US Patent 7,689,706 “System and Method for Streaming Media”. The costs associated with this patent of $3,116 is being amortized over the patent’s estimated useful life of 7 years. On December 14, 2009, the Company’s president assigned all of his rights in a patent and various patent applications for a total of $244,840, which represented the total legal fees he incurred relating to the property transferred. Of the $244,840 total, $42,368 is allocated to the cost of the patent and $202,472 is allocated to the various patent applications. The Company incurred additional legal fees associated with the patent applications during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 of $64,384. Costs associated with patent applications are not being amortized. Upon the issuance of a patent, its respective cost will be amortized over the patent’s estimated useful life. Costs associated with abandoned applications are charged to operations. On March 15, 2010, the Company purchased six patents and three patent applications from an unrelated third party for $900,000 of which $550,000 was paid on the execution of the purchase agreement. $175,000 is due on or before March 15, 2011 and the final installment of $175,000 is due on or before March 15, 2012. As the agreement did not provide for any stated interest on the payments, the Company was required to impute interest on the payment stream The Company present valued the payments at $831,394 using an effective interest rate of 15% in its computation .Of the $831,394, $706,685 was allocated to the purchased patents and $124,709 was allocated to the patent applications. The patents are being amortized over 7 years. The value assigned to the patent applications is not being amortized. Upon the issuance of a patent, its respective cost will be amortized over the patent’s estimated useful life. Costs associated with abandoned applications are charged to operations. The Company granted the Seller a license to utilize all acquired patents over their respective lives on a world-wide basis for no consideration. In addition, the Company is required to reserve for the Seller ten abbreviated dialing codes for a five year period.

12

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

Amortization charged to operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $30,217 and $0, respectively. Amortization charged to operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $42,037 and $0, respectively. A summary of patent costs subject to amortization at June 30, 2010 is as follows:

A schedule of amortization expense over the estimated life of the patents is as follows:

As of June 30, 2010, for income tax purposes, the Company has unused operating loss carryforwards of approximately $27,300,000, which may provide future federal tax benefits of approximately $9,277,000 which expire in various years through 2030 and future state benefits of approximately $2,330,000 which expire in various years through 2020.

An allowance of $11,607,000 has been provided to reduce the tax benefits accrued by the Company for these operating losses to zero as it cannot be determined when, or if, the tax benefits derived from these losses will materialize. Timing differences between expenses deducted for income tax and deducted for financial reporting purposes are insignificant and have no material impact to the differences in the reporting of income taxes.

The provisions for income tax expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

As discussed in Note 6, the Company acquired six patents and three patent applications for a payments totaling $900,000 of which $550,000 was paid. The remaining $350,000 is payable in two annual installments of $175,000 each. The patents have been pledged as collateral against the remaining balance due. As the agreement did not provided for any stated interest on the remaining two payments, the Company imputed interest at an annual rate of 15% and present valued the remaining payments to $281,394. Interest accrued and charged to operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $11,130 and $13,087, respectively. Following is the maturities of the long-term portion of the obligation:

13

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

9. Convertible Debt

In March 2010, the Company received $500,000 in consideration for issuing a convertible note and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The note is assessed interest at a rate of 12% per annum and accrued interest is required to be paid quarterly commencing on June 30, 2010. Principal is convertible into shares of the Company common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. The note matures on September 30, 2010, when principal and any remaining accrued interest are fully due and payable. On August 11, 2010, the Company accepted notice of conversion from the note holder for the full principal amount of $500,000 and all accrued interest totaling $25, 167 resulting in the issuance of 1,419,370 restricted common shares.

The warrants are exercisable into common shares commencing March 12, 2010 at a price of $0.75 per share and expire on March 12, 2012. As required, the Company valued the warrants and conversion feature of the note. The value of these instruments totaled $500,000, which was recorded as a discount against the note’s outstanding balance. The discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

Interest charged to operations relating to this note for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $15,166 and $18,333 respectively. Interest charged to operations relating to Note’s discount for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $212,508 and $282,255, respectively.

The Company’s president has assisted in funding the operations of the Company through loan advances of which a portion have been repaid. Initially, the outstanding balance, including accrued interest assessed at a rate of 8% per annum, was fully due and payable on December 2010. On July 24, 2008, the Company modified the terms of the debt and the balance due him on that date including accrued interest and accrued compensation totaling $2,319,512 was evidenced by a convertible promissory note bearing interest at an annual rate of 8%. Interest is payable monthly and the principal outstanding balance is payable on demand. If no demand is made, than the principal balance and any accrued interest is fully due and payable on July 15, 2010. Any portion of the outstanding principal loan balance is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.08 per share. On June 28, 2010, the holders elected to convert the principal balance due of $2,319,512 into 28,993,896 shares of the Company’s common stock. The holders included the Company's President who received 13,773,992 of the total shares issued.

The Company accounted for the modification of the debt pursuant to EITF 96-19 “Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments” and APB Opinion 26 (ASC Topic 470-50), and recognized a gain on the modification of $2,319,512 that was charged to equity. The convertible debt was recorded net of a discount that includes a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) amounting to $2,319,512. The discount is amortized to equity over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

Interest charged to operations relating to this note for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $45,246 and $46,263 respectively. Interest charged to operations relating to this note for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $133,778 and $138,789 respectively.

For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company charged $411,963 and $284,343 respectively, to equity on the amortization of the discount. For the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company charged $1,009,737 and $836,306 respectively, to equity on the amortization of the discount.

On June 28, 2010, the Company issued its President a new convertible promissory note totaling $155,531, which consisted of the remaining accrued interest due him on the above indicated converted note totaling $31,950 and accrued compensation due him (net of payroll taxes) totaling $123.581. The new note accrues interest at an annual rate of 1% and the principal balance owed is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. The President has the right to convert at anytime up to June 27, 2011, the maturity date of the note. Any remaining principal and unpaid accrued interest is fully due and payable on the maturity date. Interest charged to operations relating to this note for the three months and nine months June 30, 2010 amounted to $8.

The Company valued the conversion feature of the note at $155,531 using the Black-Scholes Option Model and was recorded as a discount against the note’s outstanding balance. The discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company charged $832 to equity on the amortization of the discount.

14

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

Activate, Inc. (“Activate”), a corporation wholly owned by the Company’s President, has advanced the Company $50,000. Under the originally terms of the loan, the advance was assessed interest at an annual rate of 8% and was fully due and payable with accrued interest in December 2010. On July 24, 2008, the Company modified the terms of the debt and the balance due Activate on that date including accrued interest totaling $73,445 was evidenced by a convertible promissory note bearing interest at an annual rate of 8%. Interest is payable monthly and the principal outstanding balance is payable on demand. If no demand is made, than the principal balance and any accrued interest is fully due and payable on July 15, 2010. Any portion of the outstanding principal loan balance is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.08 per share. On June 28, 2010, Activate converted the principal balance due it of $73,445 into 918,063 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Company accounted for the modification of the debt pursuant to EITF 96-19 “Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments” and APB Opinion 26 (ASC Topic 470-50), and recognized a gain on the modification of $73,445 that was charged to equity. The convertible debt was recorded net of a discount that includes BCF amounting to $73,445. The discount is amortized to equity over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

Interest charged to operations relating to this note for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $1,433 and $1,465, respectively. Interest charged to operations relating to this note for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $4,325 and $4,395, respectively. On June 28, 2010, the accrued interest on the converted note totaling $8,297 was incorporated into a new convertible promissory note as discussed below.

For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company charged $13,558 and $9,004, respectively, to equity on the amortization of the discount. For the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company charged $31,972 and $26,480, respectively, to equity on the amortization of the discount.

During the year ended September 30, 2009 Activate advanced the Company an additional net amount of $795,397. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company repaid $504,000 on these advances. The advances bear interest at a rate of 8% and the outstanding balance is fully due and payable on demand. Interest accruing on the advances and charged to operations during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $5,685 and $0, respectively. Interest accruing on the advances and charged to operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $25,158 and $0, respectively. The balance of the outstanding advances and related accrued interest at June 28, 2010 amounted to $345,567 was converted into a new convertible promissory note as discussed below.

In June 2009, Activate purchased a $250,000 promissory note from a debtor of the Company and assumed all of his rights and interest in the note. The note bears interest at an annual rate of 10%. Interest accruing on this note and charged to operations during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $6,164 and $7,172, respectively Interest accruing on this note and charged to operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $13,726 and $19,584, respectively. The balance of the Note at June 28, 2010 including accrued interest totaling to $279,787 was incorporated into a new promissory note as discussed below.

As indicated above, on June 28, 2010, the Company issued Activate a new convertible promissory note totaling $633,651, which accrues interest at an annual rate of 1%. The principal balance owed is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.37 per share. Activate has the right to convert at anytime up to June 27, 2011, the maturity date of the note. Any remaining principal and unpaid accrued interest is fully due and payable on the maturity date. Interest charged to operations relating to this note for the three months and nine months June 30, 2010 amounted to $34.

The Company valued the conversion feature of the note at $633,651 using the Black Scholes Option Model and was recorded as a discount against the note’s outstanding balance. The discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company charged $3,389 to equity on the amortization of the discount.

A Company director advanced funds $199,500 to the Company. The balance of the advances began accruing interest in December 2008 at an annual rate of 8%. Interest accrued and charged to operations during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $3,935 and $3,979, respectively. Interest accrued and charged to operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $11,893 and $13,118, respectively. The total balance owed as of June 28, 2010 including accrued interest of $224,511 was cancelled in exchange for the issuance of 606,768 shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares were valued at $916,219 based upon the trading price of the shares on the date of cancellation. The Company recognized a loss on the transaction of $691,708, which is the difference between the amount due and the market value of the shares issued.

15

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

On December 5, 2008, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with a third party for a total loan of $1,000,000. Proceeds from the loan were net of loan fees incurred by lender. The loan bears interest at an annual rate of 10% per annum and accrued interest is payable 90 days after the loan proceeds are received. All related party debt is subordinate to this loan. The loan has been guaranteed by the Company’s President, and is secured by the Company’s assets.

In June 2009, the Parties entered into a Change in Terms Agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the maturity date of the loan was initially extended to July 31, 2009. In consideration for the extension, the Company paid an interest payment of $25,000 and agreed to a loan extension fee of $25,000 that increased the amount the principal balance of the note. In addition, the Agreement required the Company to pay $300,000 by July 5, 2009.

The Agreement allowed for further extensions assuming the Company was not in default as of July 31, 2009. To extend the maturity date to August 31, 2009, the Company was required make additional payments to the note holder of no less than $300,000 by July 31, 2009, pay an extension fee of $25,000 due by July 31, 2009, and pay all interest that has accrued to July 31, 2009. A final extension to September 30, 2009 was available providing the Company made additional payments to the note holder of no less than $300,000 by August 31, 2009, paid an extension fee of $25,000 by August 31, 2009, and paid all interest that had accrued through August 31, 2009.

The Company made principal repayments of $200,000 during the year ended September 30, 2009 and paid loan fees totaling $75,000 that were charged to operations during that period. On March 29, 2010, the Company made a payment including principal and accrued interest totaling of $431,000. The Company paid the remaining balance due of $400,000 on May 12, 2010. Interest charged to operations during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted $0 and $23,556, respectively. Interest charged to operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $27,222 and $53,778, respectively.

An unrelated third party advanced a total of $134,500 to the Company. Interest accrued and charged to operations during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $2,653 and $2,683. Interest accrued and charged to operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $8,018 and $3,302, respectively. The total balance owed as of June 28, 2010 including accrued interest of $148,532 was cancelled in exchange for the issuance of 399,356 shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares were valued at $603,027 based upon the trading price of the shares on the date of cancellation. The Company recognized a loss on the transaction of $454,495, which is the difference between the amount due and the market value of the shares issued.

An unrelated third party advanced a total of $50,085 to the Company. Interest accrued and charged to operations during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $988 and $0. Interest accrued and charged to operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $3,886 and $0. The total balance owed as of June 28, 2010 including accrued interest of $53,971 was cancelled in exchange for the issuance of 145,344 shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares were valued at $219,469 based upon the trading price of the shares on the date of cancellation. The Company recognized a loss on the transaction of $165,498, which is the difference between the amount due and the market value of the shares issued.

An unrelated third party advanced a total of $150,000 to the Company. Interest accrued and charged to operations during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $2,959 and $2,992. Interest accrued and charged to operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $8,942 and $7,364. The total balance owed as of June 28, 2010 including accrued interest of $169,331 was cancelled in exchange for the issuance of 456,053 shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares were valued at $688,640 based upon the trading price of the shares on the date of cancellation. The Company recognized a loss on the transaction of $519,309, which is the difference between the amount due and the market value of the shares issued.

On December 14, 2009, the Company's president assigned all of his rights in a patent and various patent applications for a total of $244,840, which represented the total legal fees he incurred relating to the property transferred.

In March 2010, a Company director exercised warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $500. In June 2010, the same director exercised warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for a cash payment of $1,000.

16

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of notes payable, convertible debentures and a derivative warrant liability. Notes payable and convertible debentures are financial liabilities with carrying values that approximate fair value. The Company determines the fair value of notes payable and convertible debentures based on the effective yields of similar obligations. The Company determines the fair value of its derivative warrant liability based upon the trading prices of its common stock on the date of issuance and when applicable, on the last day of the quarter. The Company uses the Black-Scholes Option Model in valuing the fair value of its derivative warrant liability.

The Company believes all of the financial instruments’ recorded values approximate fair market value because of their nature and respective durations.

The Company complies with the provisions of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), previously referred to as SFAS No. 157. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. ASC 820-10-35, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures - Subsequent Measurement” (“ASC 820-10-35”), clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820-10-35 also requires that a fair value measurement reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model. The Company also follows ASC 825 “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, previously referred to as FAS 107-1 to expand required disclosures.

ASC 820-10-35 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10-35 are described below: Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.

Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company utilizes the best available information in measuring fair value. The following table summarizes, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010:

17

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

The holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to one vote per share of common stock held.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued a total of 54,809,896 shares of its common stock of which 22,527,916 shares were issued for $10,192,004 in cash, 150,000 shares were issued to a director of the Company for $1,500, 612,500 shares were issued to professional and consultants in exchange for the cancellation of $368,304 due them for past services, 1,607,521 shares were issued in cancellation of notes payable and accrued interest totaling $596,346, and 29,911,959 shares on the conversion of debt due an individual, the Company’s president and his wholly owned company totaling $2,392,957. The 612,500 shares issued to professional and consultants were valued at the trading price of the shares on their respective date of issuance and the Company recognized a loss on the issuances totaling $57,976 during the nine-month period. The 1,607,521 shares issued in cancellation of notes payable and accrued interest were valued at the trading price of the shares on their respective date of issuance and the Company recognized a loss on the issuances totaling $1,831,011 during the nine-month period.

In connection with the above-indicated Company’s private offering of 22,527,916 shares of its common stock, the Company issued warrants to purchase 7,094,144 shares of the Company’s common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.75 to $1.50 per share that expire in various dates commencing in November 2011 through June 2013. In connection with certain private placements, the Company granted warrants to purchase a total of 1,155,814 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1 per share.

As discussed in Note 9, the Company received $500,000 in March 2010 in consideration for issuing a convertible note and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.75 per share. The Warrants expire on March 12, 2012.

18

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(UNAUDITED)

On April 22, 2008, the Company adopted its 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, the Company reserved 8,800,000 shares of its common stock to be issued to employees, directors, consultants, and advisors. The exercise price under the Plan cannot be less than the fair market value of the shares on date of grant. In 2008, the Company granted options to employees and consultants to purchase a total of 8,675,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at price per share of $1.375 per share. The options expire three years from date of vesting, which is as follows:

The 6,000,000 options that vest on July 28, 2008 were granted to the Company’s president. These 8,675,000 options were valued at $544,790 using the Black-Sholes Option Model based upon an expected life of 3 years, risk free interest rate of 2.90%, and expected volatility of 94%. At the date of grant, the Company’s common stock had a market value of $.25 per share. The Company is charging the $544,790 to operations as compensation expense based upon the vesting of the respective options. The Company did not recognize any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 or 2009 relating to these options.

19

Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with Single Touch's financial statements and the related notes thereto. The Management's Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “expect,” and the like, and/or future-tense or conditional constructions (“will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc.), or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this Report on Form 10-Q. The Company’s actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Report on Form 10-Q.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial data included elsewhere in this report. See also the notes to our consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009.

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. In consultation with our Board of Directors, we have identified the following accounting policies that it believes are key to an understanding of its financial statements. These are important accounting policies that require management’s most difficult, subjective judgments.

Under the terms of various service and licensing agreements, the Company receives a fee, net of revenue sharing and other costs, each time its application is utilized by the end user. Revenue is recognized in the month the application is utilized. The Company records its revenue pursuant to Accounting Codification Standard (“ACS”) Topic 605-45, formerly EITF 99-19 “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent”.

Advanced service and licensing fees received with minimum guarantees where it cannot determine the fee earned are recognized in income on the straight line basis over the term of the license in accordance with ACS Topic 928-10, formerly FASB SFAS #50.

When the convertible feature of the conventional convertible debt provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (BCF”). We record a BCF as a debt discount pursuant to ACS Topic 470-20, formerly EITF Issue No. 98-5 (EITF 98-05”), Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingency Adjustable Conversion Ratio,” and formerly EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of EITF Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instrument(s) .” In those circumstances, the convertible debt will be recorded net of the discount related to the BCF. We amortize the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

20

The Company adopted ACS Topic 820-10, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“Topic 820-10”), at the beginning of fiscal year 2009 to measure the fair value of certain of its financial assets and liabilities required to be measured on a recurring basis. The adoption of Topic 820-10 did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under Topic 820-10 are described below: Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access. The Company has no Level 1 assets or liabilities.

Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

The Company has no Level 2 assets. The Company’s Level 2 liabilities consist of notes payable, convertible debentures and a derivative warrant liability. The Company determines the fair value of notes payable and convertible debentures based on the effective yields of similar obligations. The Company determines the fair value of its derivative warrant liability based upon the trading prices of its common stock on the date of issuance and when applicable, on the last day of the quarter. The Company uses the Black-Scholes Option Model in valuing the fair value of its derivative warrant liability.

Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The Company has no Level 3 assets or liabilities.

We value all services rendered in exchange for our common stock at the quoted price of the shares issued at date of issuance or at the fair value of the services rendered, whichever is more readily determinable. All other services provided in exchange for other non-monetary consideration is valued at either the fair value of the services received or the fair value of the consideration relinquished, whichever is more readily determinable.

Our accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of ACS Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”, and formerly EITF 00-18, Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees.” The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement. In accordance to ACS Topic 505, an asset acquired in exchange for the issuance of fully vested, nonforfeitable equity instruments should not be presented or classified as an offset to equity on the grantor’s balance sheet once the equity instrument is granted for accounting purposes. Accordingly, we record the fair value of nonforfeitable common stock issued for future consulting services as prepaid services in our consolidated balance sheet.

We account for our software development costs in accordance with ACS Topic 985-20, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 86, “Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed.” Under ACS Topic 985-20, we expense software development costs as incurred until we determine that the software is technologically feasible. Once we determine that the software is technologically feasible, we amortize the costs capitalized over its expected useful life of the software, which is generally two years.

21

Plan of Operation

Single Touch Systems, Inc. is a provider of customized easy-to-use wireless solutions. Our patent pending technology simplifies adoption by reaching new data subscribers and generating new revenue streams for carriers, consumer brand companies and retailers. Single Touch's Mobile Dial Code (“MDC”) programs make mobile easy for brands, consumers and carriers. The simplicity of dialing a ‘#’ plus a 3 to 6 digit branded telephone number has resulted in high response and download conversion rates. A large percentage of MDC consumers are first time data users, demonstrating how simple it is to deliver mobile data and campaigns through these MDC programs while also opening up a new market outside of Short Message Service (“SMS”).

Our MDC programs are a developing revenue source. The Company initially developed software applications utilized by end users in downloading images, ringtones, games, and other content into their cell phones and other wireless communication devices. The Company has transitioned to a transaction based revenue model facilitating mobile commerce and advertising using our Enhanced Services Platform. The Company generates revenue from each voice call, data transmission, advertisement and mobile payment transaction that the platform enables.

Recently developed programs involve campaigns providing value added services to traditional retail customers; like notifying pharmacy customers that a prescription is ready for pick up and alerting customers to special product deals. We are also developing mobile couponing and other mobile payment services to address a broader market application of mobile data services.

Our focus of operations for the next 12-month period will be to develop our retail messaging business segment and focusing on growing operations in other product categories including retail to generate revenues. We intend to use profits from operations to maintain and grow each product category. We will continue our efforts to raise additional capital to maintain existing and generate expanded operations.

Results of Operations for the Three-Months Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009

The Company reported a net loss of $14,872,535 for the three-months ended June 30, 2010 versus a net loss of $3,713,273 for the three-month period ending June 30, 2009.

The net loss for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 included an increase in the changes in fair value of derivative and warrant liability of $11,842,600; net loss on settlement of indebtedness and notes payable of $1,843,407; salary and wages totaling $342,181 and depreciation and amortization expense of $208,973.

The net loss for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 included stock based compensation charge of $3,457,876 relating to warrants granted to a consultant; research and development expense of $5,279,631 of which $4,583,334 pertained to a charge off on the impairment of certain patent applications acquired from Streamworks Technologies, Inc (See Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements); salary and wages totaling $44,800 and depreciation and amortization expense of $194,534. Net loss was offset by a gain in the changes in fair value of derivative and warrant liability expense of $5,728,665

Our total operating expenses during the three months in 2009 excluding our research and development costs and stock based compensation totaled $743,466. Our operating expenses in 2010 excluding loss on the settlement of debt totaled $1,010,428. The net increase of $266,492 pertains primarily to salaries paid in 2010.

We had decreased royalties and application costs for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same three month period in 2009 of $50,016, a 24.6% decrease ($153,554 in 2010 compared to $203,570 in 2009). This decrease was significantly caused by a reduction in our fixed applications costs.

The components of operating expenses include royalties and application costs as discussed above, officers’ compensation and salaries and wages ($342,181 in 2010 as compared to $69,786 in 2009), consulting services ($60,000 in 2010 as compared to $62,649 in 2009), depreciation and amortization ($208,973 in 2010 as compared to $194,534 in 2009) and general and administrative expenses ($26,565 in 2010 as compared to $86,347 in 2009).

22

Another significant difference comparing the three months ended June 30, 2010 to the same three month period in 2009 was the change in the fair value of our derivative liability which amounted to an $11,842,600 loss in 2010 compared to $5,728,665 gain in 2009. The terms of the warrant issued to our special advisor causes us to treat the warrant as a derivative financial instrument pursuant to ASC Topic 815, formerly EITF 00-19 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company's Own Stock”. We value the warrant using the Black-Sholes Option Model. The fair value of the warrant liability increased at June 30, 2010 by $11,842,600, resulting in an increase in our derivative liability and the charge to operations.

Revenues for the three month period ending June 30, 2010 were $131,451, resulting in a slight decrease from revenues of $133,866 for the comparable period in 2009. The revenue decrease in the three month period ended June 30, 2010 from the comparative period in 2009 was a result of the termination of our services to Telegence and Lavalife. Revenue increased 22.6% from the preceding quarter ended March 31, 2010 as our new programs began to ramp up. Our top three customers accounted for 86% of our revenues versus 83% in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

Results of Operations for the Nine -Months Ended June 30, 2010 and, 2009

The Company reported a net loss of $16,943,810 for the nine-months ended June 30, 2010 compared to a loss from operations for the nine-months ended June 30, 2009 of $7,584,799, an increase in 2010 of $9,359,011. The significant cause in our increase in our net loss in 2010 compared to 2009 pertains to the change in the fair value of our warrant liability of a loss in 2010 of ($10,660,100) compared to a gain in 2009 of $9,631,629.

Our loss from operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $5,728,314 as compared to $16,972,020 during the same nine month period in the prior year. Of the $5,728,314 operating loss we incurred in 2010, $1,152,625 pertains to stock based compensation and $1,888,987 pertains to the loss on the settlement of debt and noted payable. Of the $16,972,020 operating loss we incurred in 2009, $5,308,012 pertains to our research and development costs and $9,221,002 pertain to stock based compensation. Our loss from operations in 2010 excluding stock based compensation and settlement of debt and notes payable amounted to $2,686,702. Our loss from operations in 2009 excluding research and development costs and stock based compensation amounted to $2,443,006.

We had decreased royalties and application costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same nine-month period in 2009 of $205,408, a 32.06% decrease ($435,207 in 2010 compared to $640,615 in 2009). This decrease was significantly caused by a reduction in our fixed applications costs.

Revenues for the nine-month period ending June 30, 2010 were $265,546, resulting in a decrease of 65.77% over revenues of $775,760 for the comparable period in 2009. The revenue decrease in the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 from the comparative period in 2009 was a result of the termination of our services to Telegence and Lavalife.

At June 30, 2010, we had total assets of $7,009,622 and total liabilities of $17,074,072; comparably, at June 30, 2009, we had total assets of $6,342,993 and total liabilities of $9,754,309. Of the total assets at June 30, 2009, $4,610,501 pertains to the unamortized portion of the fair value of the warrants issued to our special advisor that was classified to prepaid expense. We have amortized the fair value of the warrant over the initial one year term of the consulting agreement. Total assets at June 30, 2009, excluding the prepaid consulting amounts to $1,732,492, which is $5,277,130 less than our total assets in June 30, 2010 of $7,009,622. The difference is principally made of an increase in our cash balance of $4,937,636 and an increase in our patents and patent applications costs of $1,021,963.

23

Of the total liabilities at June 30, 2010 of $17,074,072, $15,372,500 pertains to the derivative liability of the above indicated warrant. Of the total liabilities at June 30, 2009 of $9,754,309, $4,199,875 pertains to the derivative liability of the above indicated warrant. Total liabilities at June 30, 2010 and 2009 excluding the derivative warrant liabilities totaled $1,701,572 and $5,554,434, respectively. The decrease in total liabilities in 2010 over 2009 is primarily due to the decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1,103,894, decrease in accrued compensation of $158,650, decrease in amount we owed on related party and third party debt of $2,441,373 and a decrease in convertible debentures of $720,115.

During the nine-month period ending June 30, 2010 cash used in operating activities totaled $3,150,381; cash used in investing activities totaled $1,305,215, primarily for the purchase of capitalized software development costs of $360,495 and for the purchase of patent and patent application costs of $904,720; cash provided by financing activities totaled $9,179,462 primarily from net proceeds from the issuance of shares of our common stock and a convertible note. We had an overall net increase in cash for the nine month period in 2010 of $4,723,866; where the beginning balance for the period was $259,558 and the cash balance at the end of the period was $4,983,424. During the nine-month period ending June 30, 2009 cash used in operating activities totaled $1,506,039; cash used in investing activities totaled $540,953, primarily for purchase of capitalized software development costs of $521,171. During the nine-month period ending June 30, 2009 we received $1,917,719 in cash provided by financing activities including proceeds from convertible debt and other notes payable of $1,250,000. The resultant overall net decrease in cash for the period was $129,273; where the beginning balance for the period was $175,061, the cash balance at the end of the period was $45,788.

Historically, our operations have been funded through loans from our Founder/CEO Anthony Macaluso, loans from third parties, and proceeds from the issuance of our shares of common stock. We are not yet generating sufficient revenue to fully pay for our operations. We currently have sufficient cash on hand from financing activities and do not expect to experience cash flow difficulties in the next 12 month period. Although no assurances can be given, we believe that our cash flow deficit will improve as revenues and sales have increased and continue to increase from our current programs. These programs are experiencing substantially increasing demand from end users as they continue to roll out programs we have had in development and implementation with them for an extended period.

We have been able to secure significant financing during the period and have resolved our significant debt obligations with cash or equity. Although no assurances can be given, we believe that we may be able to secure additional equity and/or debt financing in the future if needed.

Our near term cash requirements are anticipated to be offset from cash reserves obtained from recent financing activities. Since inception, we have financed cash flow requirements through debt financing and issuance of common stock for cash and services.

Over the next twelve months we believe that existing capital and anticipated funds from operations will be sufficient to sustain operations and planned expansion.

Our operating history makes predictions of future operating results difficult to ascertain. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in our stage of development. Such risks include, but are not limited to, an evolving business model and the management of growth. To address these risks we must, among other things, diversify our customer base, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, continue to develop and upgrade technology and products, respond to competitive developments, and attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so can have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements or financing activities with special purpose entities.

24

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, Mr. Macaluso, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Internal control systems, no matter how well designed and operated, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even a system which is determined to be effective cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues have been detected or prevented. Our systems of internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

On December 8, 2009, the Company received notice of Arbitration RE: Fort Ashford Funds, LLC vs. Single Touch Systems & Macaluso through Judicate West case #A157734-24. The matter relates to any outstanding balance of Principal and interest due on a Loan and Security Agreement, the Company entered into on December 5, 2008 for a total loan of $1,000,000. As of the date of this Report, the Company has repaid the $1,000,000 principal, additional fees totaling $75,000 and interest accrued. The Company has not received a release from Fort Ashford Funds, LLC as of the date of this report. As of the date of this report the arbitration was dismissed by Fort Ashford Funds, LLC and no other proceedings are pending. On July 28, 2010, the Single Touch Interactive, Inc. (STI) received service of process for Panzarella Consulting, LLC v. Single Touch Interactive, Inc., et al. USDC Case No. 3:10-cv-00424 filed in Reno, Nevada on July 12, 2010. Panzarella Consulting, LLC alleges that between September 2008 and January 2009, it sought to convert Warrants issued by STI in 2005 to common stock in the Company. Panzarella Consulting, LLC seeks damages for the difference between the claimed exercise price and the price the Company's stock was trading for at the time of the alleged conversion of the Warrants. The Company has no record of Panzarella Consulting, LLC tendering the Warrants, required Form(s) of Subscription, or the payment that would be required to exercise the Warrants. There is no cashless exercise option in said Warrants. The Company has demanded that Panzarella Consulting, LLC provide evidence of the tender of the Warrants, Form(s) of Subscription and payment to substantiate its allegations of the attempted conversion of the Warrants, but Panzarella Consulting, LLC has refused to provide any evidence to substantiate its allegations of the attempted conversion of the Warrants. Panzarella Consulting, LLC was not formed until June 10, 2010. The Company currently considers this a nuisance suit. A motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction has been filed and a hearing is set for November 29, 2010.

From time to time the Company may be named in claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Currently, no additional legal proceedings or claims are pending against or involve the Company that, in the opinion of management, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its business and financial condition.

25

Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There were no unregistered sales of the Company’s equity securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that were not otherwise disclosed in this or our prior periodic reports or a current report on Form 8-K. As of the date of this report and pursuant to their engagement for financial services, Gar Wood Securities, LLC has received a total of 1,269,801 warrants for the purchase of one common share at a price of $1.00 per share. The warrants expire three years from the dates of grant.

As of the date of this report and pursuant to their engagement for financial services, Financial West Investment Group, Inc. has received a total of 55,541 warrants for the purchase of one common share at a price of $1.00 per share. The warrants expire three years from the dates of grant.

In March 2010, the Company received $500,000 in consideration for issuing a convertible note and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.75 per share. The Warrants expire on March 12, 2012. On August 11, 2010, the Company accepted notice of conversion from the note holder for the full principal amount of $500,000 and all accrued interest totaling $25,167 resulting in the issuance of 1,419,370 restricted common shares to the individual investor.

All sales were issued as exempted transactions under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933. The recipient(s) of our securities took them for investment purposes without a view to distribution. Furthermore, they had access to information concerning our Company and our business prospects; there was no general solicitation or advertising for the purchase of our securities; and the securities are restricted pursuant to Rule 144.

26

Item 6 Exhibits

Single Touch Systems, Inc. includes by reference the following exhibits:

27

Single Touch Systems, Inc. includes herewith the following exhibits:

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

28