SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission files number 1-13395
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 56-2010790 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
6415 Idlewild Road, Suite 109, Charlotte, North Carolina | 28212 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(704) 566-2400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such file).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer ý | Non-Accelerated Filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
o No ý
As of April 22, 2011, there were 40,920,177 shares of Class A Common Stock and 12,029,375 shares of
Class B Common Stock outstanding.
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
First Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
New vehicles |
$ | 980,745 | $ | 778,244 | ||||
Used vehicles |
482,031 | 418,849 | ||||||
Wholesale vehicles |
35,362 | 30,806 | ||||||
Total vehicles |
1,498,138 | 1,227,899 | ||||||
Parts, service and collision repair |
291,770 | 275,172 | ||||||
Finance, insurance and other |
49,468 | 40,595 | ||||||
Total revenues |
1,839,376 | 1,543,666 | ||||||
Cost of Sales: |
||||||||
New vehicles |
(920,686 | ) | (725,663 | ) | ||||
Used vehicles |
(443,787 | ) | (384,071 | ) | ||||
Wholesale vehicles |
(35,818 | ) | (31,464 | ) | ||||
Total vehicles |
(1,400,291 | ) | (1,141,198 | ) | ||||
Parts, service and collision repair |
(147,917 | ) | (136,589 | ) | ||||
Total cost of sales |
(1,548,208 | ) | (1,277,787 | ) | ||||
Gross profit |
291,168 | 265,879 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(232,514 | ) | (220,653 | ) | ||||
Impairment charges |
(17 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(9,992 | ) | (8,418 | ) | ||||
Operating income |
48,645 | 36,764 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest expense, floor plan |
(5,436 | ) | (4,798 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, other, net |
(15,447 | ) | (17,151 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, non-cash, convertible debt |
(1,694 | ) | (1,677 | ) | ||||
Interest expense / amortization, non-cash, cash flow swaps |
178 | (1,683 | ) | |||||
Other income, net |
73 | 64 | ||||||
Total other expense |
(22,326 | ) | (25,245 | ) | ||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
26,319 | 11,519 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(10,528 | ) | (4,953 | ) | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
15,791 | 6,566 | ||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||
Loss from operations and the sale of discontinued franchises |
(1,273 | ) | (3,980 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
446 | 1,568 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
(827 | ) | (2,412 | ) | ||||
Net income |
$ | 14,964 | $ | 4,154 | ||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
Earnings per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.13 | ||||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
(0.02 | ) | (0.05 | ) | ||||
Earnings per common share |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.08 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
52,416 | 51,889 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
Earnings per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.12 | ||||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
(0.01 | ) | (0.04 | ) | ||||
Earnings per common share |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.08 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
65,950 | 52,579 | ||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.025 | $ | - |
See notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in
thousands)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 8,355 | $ | 21,842 | ||||
Receivables, net |
215,546 | 239,634 | ||||||
Inventories |
931,236 | 903,221 | ||||||
Other current assets |
31,742 | 25,653 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,186,879 | 1,190,350 | ||||||
Property and Equipment, net |
515,657 | 436,260 | ||||||
Goodwill |
468,465 | 468,516 | ||||||
Other Intangible Assets, net |
78,735 | 79,149 | ||||||
Other Assets |
74,813 | 76,489 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 2,324,549 | $ | 2,250,764 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Notes payable - floor plan - trade |
$ | 461,787 | $ | 478,834 | ||||
Notes payable - floor plan - non-trade |
386,824 | 383,151 | ||||||
Trade accounts payable |
87,486 | 59,719 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
10,590 | 14,070 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
161,027 | 160,763 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
9,863 | 9,050 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
1,117,577 | 1,105,587 | ||||||
Long-Term Debt |
598,969 | 546,401 | ||||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
129,732 | 134,081 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||
Class A convertible preferred stock, none issued |
- | - | ||||||
Class A common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 56,160,588 shares issued and 40,888,015 shares
outstanding at March 31, 2011; 55,738,639 shares issued and 40,757,999 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
562 | 557 | ||||||
Class B common stock; $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized;
12,029,375 shares outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
121 | 121 | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
668,762 | 666,961 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
67,066 | 53,427 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(16,649 | ) | (18,683 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost (15,272,573 Class A shares held at March 31, 2011
and 14,980,640 Class A shares held at December 31, 2010) |
(241,591 | ) | (237,688 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
478,271 | 464,695 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 2,324,549 | $ | 2,250,764 | ||||
See notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars and shares in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Other | Total | Compre- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Common Stock | Paid-In | Retained | Treasury | Comprehensive | Stockholders | hensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Income (Loss) | Equity | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 |
55,739 | $ | 557 | 12,029 | $ | 121 | $ | 666,961 | $ | 53,427 | $ | (237,688 | ) | $ | (18,683 | ) | $ | 464,695 | $ | 93,596 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares awarded under stock compensation plans |
282 | 3 | - | - | 645 | - | - | - | 648 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (3,903 | ) | - | (3,903 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit associated with stock
compensation plans |
- | - | - | - | 498 | - | - | - | 498 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net
of tax expense of $1,247 |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,034 | 2,034 | 2,034 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
- | - | - | - | 108 | - | - | - | 108 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock amortization, net of forfeitures |
- | - | - | - | 552 | - | - | - | 552 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
- | - | - | - | - | 14,964 | - | - | 14,964 | 14,964 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends ($0.025 per share) |
- | - | - | - | - | (1,325 | ) | - | - | (1,325 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
140 | 2 | - | - | (2 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2011 |
56,161 | $ | 562 | 12,029 | $ | 121 | $ | 668,762 | $ | 67,066 | $ | (241,591 | ) | $ | (16,649 | ) | $ | 478,271 | $ | 16,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||
See notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,964 | $ | 4,154 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment |
9,966 | 8,510 | ||||||
Provision for bad debt expense |
111 | 332 | ||||||
Other amortization |
414 | 414 | ||||||
Debt issuance cost amortization |
987 | 1,012 | ||||||
Debt discount amortization, net of premium amortization |
1,274 | 1,266 | ||||||
Stock - based compensation expense |
107 | 164 | ||||||
Amortization of restricted stock |
551 | 641 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(251 | ) | (244 | ) | ||||
Equity interest in earnings of investees |
(143 | ) | (195 | ) | ||||
Asset impairment charges |
17 | 44 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on disposal of franchises and property and equipment |
11 | (21 | ) | |||||
Loss on exit of leased dealerships |
1,045 | 1,461 | ||||||
Non-cash adjustments - cash flow swaps |
(178 | ) | 1,683 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities that relate to operations: |
||||||||
Receivables |
23,977 | 17,574 | ||||||
Inventories |
(28,105 | ) | (35,881 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
(6,754 | ) | (12,562 | ) | ||||
Notes payable - floor plan - trade |
(17,047 | ) | 195,202 | |||||
Trade accounts payable and other liabilities |
23,434 | (9,258 | ) | |||||
Total adjustments |
9,416 | 170,142 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
24,380 | 174,296 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of land, property and equipment |
(90,587 | ) | (7,766 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
284 | (41 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of franchises |
134 | 504 | ||||||
Distributions from equity investees |
600 | - | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(89,569 | ) | (7,303 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net (repayments) borrowings on notes payable floor plan - non-trade |
3,673 | (190,942 | ) | |||||
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities |
122,735 | 40,000 | ||||||
Repayments on revolving credit facilities |
(122,735 | ) | (40,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
53,950 | 209,839 | ||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(1,844 | ) | (1,538 | ) | ||||
Purchases of treasury stock |
(3,903 | ) | (783 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit associated with stock compensation plans |
498 | 218 | ||||||
Income tax benefit associated with convertible hedge |
- | 66 | ||||||
Issuance of shares under stock compensation plans |
648 | 175 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(1,320 | ) | - | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
51,702 | 17,035 | ||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(13,487 | ) | 184,028 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
21,842 | 30,035 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 8,355 | $ | 214,063 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedging instruments
(net of tax expense of $1,247 and $644 in 2011 and 2010, respectively) |
$ | 2,034 | $ | 868 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest, including amount capitalized |
$ | 25,801 | $ | 26,663 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 1,097 | $ | (123 | ) |
See notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for the first quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 have been prepared pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all material normal recurring
adjustments necessary to fairly state the financial position and the results of operations for the
periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for the entire fiscal year. These interim financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Sonic Automotive, Inc. (Sonic
or the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010, which were included in Sonics Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Reclassifications The Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the first
quarter ended March 31, 2010 reflect the reclassification of balances from continuing operations to
discontinued operations from the prior year presentation for additional franchises sold and
terminated or identified for sale subsequent to March 31, 2010. The Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income for the first quarter ended March 31, 2010 also reflect the
reclassification of balances from discontinued operations to continuing operations for franchises
identified for sale as of March 31, 2010, but which Sonic has decided to retain and operate as of
March 31, 2011. There were no franchises held for sale at March 31, 2011.
Lease Exit Accruals Lease exit accruals relate to facilities Sonic has ceased using in its
operations. The accruals represent the present value of the lease payments, net of estimated
sublease proceeds, for the remaining life of the operating leases and other accruals necessary to
satisfy the lease commitment to the landlord. A summary of the activity of these lease exit
accruals consists of the following:
(In thousands) | |||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 43,534 | |||
Lease exit expense (1) |
1,045 | ||||
Payments |
(2,165 | ) | |||
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
$ | 42,414 | |||
(1) | Approximately $0.9 million is recorded in interest expense, other, net, and the remaining $0.1
million is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. |
Income Tax Expense The overall effective tax rates for the first quarters ended March
31, 2011 and 2010 are higher than federal statutory rates due to the effect of state income taxes.
The overall effective tax rate from continuing operations was 40.0% for the first quarter ended
March 31, 2011. The overall effective tax rate from continuing operations was 43.0% for the first
quarter ended March 31, 2010. The effective rate for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 was
lower than the prior year period due to the level of overall taxable income and the shift in the
distribution of taxable income between states in which Sonic operates.
2.
Discontinued Operations
Dispositions The operating results of disposed franchises and franchises held for sale are
included in the loss from discontinued operations in Sonics Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income. At March 31, 2011 there were no dealership franchises held for sale.
Revenues and other activities associated with franchises classified as discontinued operations
were as follows:
7
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
First Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (373 | ) | $ | (2,605 | ) | ||
Gain on disposal of businesses |
25 | 270 | ||||||
Lease exit charges |
(925 | ) | (1,645 | ) | ||||
Pre-tax loss |
$ | (1,273 | ) | $ | (3,980 | ) | ||
Total revenues |
$ | - | $ | 25,272 |
Lease exit charges recorded for the first quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 relate
to interest charges and the revision of estimates on previously established lease exit accruals.
The lease exit accruals represent the present value of the lease payments, net of estimated
sublease proceeds, for the remaining life of the operating leases and other accruals necessary to
satisfy the lease commitment to the landlord.
3.
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
New vehicles |
$ | 619,237 | $ | 628,939 | ||||
Used vehicles |
201,872 | 165,039 | ||||||
Parts and accessories |
51,923 | 50,854 | ||||||
Other |
58,204 | 58,389 | ||||||
Inventories |
$ | 931,236 | $ | 903,221 | ||||
4.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Land |
$ | 120,237 | $ | 76,357 | ||||
Building and improvements |
398,279 | 353,088 | ||||||
Office equipment and fixtures |
79,631 | 77,654 | ||||||
Parts and service equipment |
57,619 | 56,651 | ||||||
Company vehicles |
8,261 | 8,137 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
44,440 | 48,230 | ||||||
Total, at cost |
708,467 | 620,117 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(190,790 | ) | (181,837 | ) | ||||
Subtotal |
517,677 | 438,280 | ||||||
Less: assets held for sale (1) |
(2,020 | ) | (2,020 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 515,657 | $ | 436,260 | ||||
(1) | Included in other current assets in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
In the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, Sonic purchased five dealership properties for
$75.2 million which it previously leased through long-term operating leases, utilizing cash on hand
and borrowings under the 2010 Credit Facilities
8
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(see Note 6 for discussion on the 2010 Credit Facilities). Subsequent to the purchase date, Sonic
obtained mortgage funding of $54.0 million related these properties.
5.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Franchise | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||
Agreements | Gross Goodwill | Impairment | Net Goodwill | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 64,835 | $ | 1,265,241 | $ | (796,725 | ) | $ | 468,516 | |||||||
Reductions from sales of businesses |
- | (51 | ) | - | (51 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
$ | 64,835 | $ | 1,265,190 | $ | (796,725 | ) | $ | 468,465 | |||||||
At December 31, 2010, Sonic had $14.3 million of definite life intangibles recorded
related to favorable lease agreements. After the effect of amortization of the definite life
intangibles, the balance recorded at March 31, 2011 was $13.9 million and was included in Other
Intangible Assets, net, in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
6.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
2010 Revolving Credit Facility (1) |
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Senior Subordinated Notes bearing interest at 9.0% (9.0% Notes) |
210,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
Senior Subordinated Notes bearing interest at 8.625% (8.625% Notes) |
42,855 | 42,855 | ||||||
Convertible Senior Notes bearing interest at 5.0% (5.0% Convertible Notes) |
172,500 | 172,500 | ||||||
Notes payable to a finance company bearing interest from 9.52% to 10.52% (with
a weighted average of 10.19%) |
15,048 | 15,618 | ||||||
Mortgage notes to finance companies-fixed rate, bearing interest from 4.50% to 7.03% |
123,926 | 88,262 | ||||||
Mortgage notes to finance companies-variable rate, bearing interest at 1.25 to 3.50 percentage
points above one-month LIBOR |
62,697 | 45,639 | ||||||
Net debt discount and premium (2) |
(24,180 | ) | (25,482 | ) | ||||
Other |
5,986 | 6,059 | ||||||
$ | 608,832 | $ | 555,451 | |||||
Less current maturities |
(9,863 | ) | (9,050 | ) | ||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 598,969 | $ | 546,401 | ||||
(1) | Interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 3.50% above LIBOR at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010. |
|
(2) | March 31, 2011 includes $1.3 million discount associated with the 9.0% Notes, $0.2 million
discount associated with the 8.625% Notes, $23.3 million discount associated with the 5.0%
Convertible Notes, $1.7 million premium associated with notes payable to a finance company and $1.0
million discount associated with mortgage notes payable.
December 31, 2010 includes $1.4 million discount associated with the 9.0% Notes, $0.2 million
discount associated with the 8.625% Notes, $24.7 million discount associated with the 5.0%
Convertible Notes, $1.8 million premium associated with notes payable to a finance company and $1.0
million discount associated with mortgage notes payable. |
2010 Credit Facilities
On January 15, 2010, Sonic entered into an amended and restated syndicated revolving credit
agreement (the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility) and a syndicated floor plan credit facility (the
2010 Floor Plan Facility). The 2010 Revolving Credit Facility and 2010 Floor Plan Facility
(collectively the 2010 Credit Facilities) mature on August 15, 2012.
Availability under the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility is calculated as the lesser of $150.0
million or a borrowing base calculated based on certain eligible assets plus 50% of the fair market
value of 5,000,000 shares of common stock of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. (SMI) that are pledged as
collateral, less the aggregate face amount of any outstanding letters
9
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
of credit under the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility (the 2010 Revolving Borrowing Base). The
2010 Revolving Credit Facility may be expanded up to $215.0 million upon satisfaction of certain
conditions. A withdrawal of this pledge by Sonic Financial Corporation (SFC), which holds the
5,000,000 shares of common stock of SMI, or a significant decline in the value of SMI common stock,
would reduce the amount Sonic can borrow under the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility.
The 2010 Revolving Borrowing Base was approximately $143.4 million at March 31, 2011. At March
31, 2011, Sonic had no outstanding borrowings on the revolver and $43.2 million in outstanding
letters of credit resulting in total borrowing availability of $100.2 million under the 2010
Revolving Credit Facility.
Outstanding obligations under the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility are secured by a pledge of
substantially all of the assets of Sonic and its subsidiaries and by the pledge of 5,000,000 shares
of common stock of SMI by SFC. The collateral also provides for the pledge of the franchise
agreements and stock or equity interests of Sonics dealership franchise subsidiaries, except for
those dealership franchise subsidiaries where the applicable manufacturer prohibits such a pledge,
in which cases the stock or equity interests of the dealership franchise subsidiary is subject to
an escrow arrangement with the administrative agent. Substantially all of Sonics subsidiaries also
guarantee its obligations under the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility.
The 2010 Floor Plan Facility is comprised of a new vehicle revolving floor plan facility in an
amount up to $321.0 million (the 2010 New Vehicle Floor Plan Facility) and a used vehicle
revolving floor plan facility in an amount up to $50.0 million, subject to a borrowing base (the
2010 Used Vehicle Floor Plan Facility). Sonic may, under certain conditions, request an increase
in the 2010 Floor Plan Facility of up to $125.0 million, which shall be allocated between the 2010
New Vehicle Floor Plan Facility and the 2010 Used Vehicle Floor Plan Facility as Sonic requests,
with no more than 15% of the aggregate commitments allocated to the commitments under the 2010 Used
Vehicle Floor Plan Facility. Outstanding obligations under the 2010 Floor Plan Facility are
guaranteed by Sonic and certain of its subsidiaries and are secured by a pledge of substantially
all of the assets of Sonic and its subsidiaries.
The amounts outstanding under the 2010 Credit Facilities bear interest at variable rates based
on specified percentages above LIBOR according to a performance-based pricing grid determined by
Sonics Consolidated Total Debt to EBITDA Ratio (as defined in the 2010 Credit Facilities
agreement) as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter.
Sonic agreed under the 2010 Credit Facilities not to pledge any assets to any third party,
subject to certain stated exceptions, including floor plan financing arrangements. In addition, the
2010 Credit Facilities contain certain negative covenants, including covenants which could restrict
or prohibit indebtedness, liens, the payment of dividends, capital expenditures and material
dispositions and acquisitions of assets as well as other customary covenants and default
provisions. Specifically, the 2010 Credit Facilities permit cash dividends on Sonics Class A and
Class B common stock so long as no event of default (as defined in the 2010 Credit Facilities) has
occurred and is continuing and provided that Sonic remains in compliance with all financial
covenants under the 2010 Credit Facilities.
Covenants
The 2010 Credit Facilities contain certain covenants, including covenants which could restrict
or prohibit indebtedness, liens, payment of dividends, capital expenditures and material
dispositions and acquisitions of assets as well as other customary covenants and default
provisions. Sonic was in compliance with the covenants under the 2010 Credit Facilities as of March
31, 2011 and expects to be in compliance with the covenants for the foreseeable future. Financial
covenants include required specified ratios (as each is defined in the 2010 Credit Facilities) of:
Covenant | ||||||||||||
Consolidated | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Consolidated | Fixed Charge | Total Senior | ||||||||||
Liquidity | Coverage | Secured Debt to | ||||||||||
Ratio | Ratio | EBITDA Ratio | ||||||||||
Through March 30, 2011 |
≥ 1.00 | ≥ 1.10 | ≤ 2.25 | |||||||||
March 31, 2011 through and including March 30, 2012 |
≥ 1.05 | ≥ 1.15 | ≤ 2.25 | |||||||||
March 31, 2012 and thereafter |
≥ 1.10 | ≥ 1.20 | ≤ 2.25 | |||||||||
March 31, 2011 actual |
1.15 | 1.45 | 1.50 |
10
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The 2010 Credit Facilities contain events of default, including cross-defaults to other
material indebtedness, change of control events and events of default customary for syndicated
commercial credit facilities. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, Sonic could be required
to immediately repay all outstanding amounts under the 2010 Credit Facilities. Sonic was in
compliance with all required covenants as of March 31, 2011.
In addition, many of Sonics facility leases are governed by a guarantee agreement between the
landlord and Sonic that contains financial and operating covenants. The financial covenants are
identical to those under the 2010 Credit Facilities with the exception of one financial covenant
related to the ratio of EBTDAR to Rent (as defined in the lease agreements) with a required ratio
of no less than 1.5 to 1.0. At March 31, 2011, the ratio was 2.3 to 1.0.
9.0% Senior Subordinated Notes (9.0% Notes)
The 9.0% Notes are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Sonic and are guaranteed by
Sonics domestic operating subsidiaries. Interest is payable semi-annually on March 15 and
September 15 each year. Sonic may redeem the 9.0% Notes in whole or in part at any time after March
15, 2014 at the following redemption prices, which are expressed as percentages of the principal
amount:
Redemption | ||||
Beginning on March 15, 2014 |
104.50 | % | ||
Beginning on March 15, 2015 |
102.25 | % | ||
Beginning on March 15, 2016 and thereafter |
100.00 | % |
In addition, on or before March 15, 2013, Sonic may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate
principal amount of the 9.0% Notes at par value plus accrued interest with proceeds from certain
equity offerings. The Indenture also provides that holders of 9.0% Notes may require Sonic to
repurchase the 9.0% Notes at 101% of the par value of the 9.0% Notes, plus accrued interest if
Sonic undergoes a change of control as defined in the Indenture.
The Indenture governing the 9.0% Notes contains certain specified restrictive covenants. Sonic
has agreed not to pledge any assets to any third party lender of senior subordinated debt except
under certain limited circumstances. Sonic also has agreed to certain other limitations or
prohibitions concerning the incurrence of other indebtedness, capital stock, guarantees, asset
sales, investments, cash dividends to stockholders, distributions and redemptions. Specifically,
the indenture governing Sonics 9.0% Notes limits Sonics ability to pay quarterly cash dividends
on Sonics Class A and B common stock in excess of $0.10 per share. Sonic may only pay quarterly
cash dividends on Sonics Class A and B common stock if Sonic complies with the terms of the
indenture governing the 9.0% Notes. Sonic was in compliance with all restrictive covenants as of
March 31, 2011.
Balances outstanding under Sonics 9.0% Notes are guaranteed by all of Sonics operating
domestic subsidiaries. These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. The
parent company has no independent assets or operations. The non-domestic and non-operating
subsidiaries that are not guarantors are considered to be minor.
Sonics obligations under the 9.0% Notes may be accelerated by the holders of 25% of the
outstanding principal amount of the 9.0% Notes then outstanding if certain events of default occur,
including: (1) defaults in the payment of principal or interest when due; (2) defaults in the
performance, or breach, of Sonics covenants under the 9.0% Notes; and (3) certain defaults under
other agreements under which Sonic or its subsidiaries have outstanding indebtedness in excess of
$35.0 million.
8.625% Senior Subordinated Notes (8.625% Notes)
The 8.625% Notes are unsecured obligations that rank equal in right of payment to all of
Sonics existing and future senior subordinated indebtedness, mature on August 15, 2013 and are
redeemable at par at Sonics option after August 15, 2008.
Balances outstanding under Sonics 8.625% Notes are guaranteed by all of Sonics operating
domestic subsidiaries. These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. The
parent company has no independent assets or operations. The non-domestic and non-operating
subsidiaries that are not guarantors are considered to be minor.
11
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5.0% Convertible Senior Notes (5.0% Convertible Notes)
Interest payments on the 5.0% Convertible Notes are payable semiannually on April 1 and
October 1 of each year, beginning on April 1, 2010. The 5.0% Convertible Notes mature on October 1,
2029. Sonic may redeem some or all of the 5.0% Convertible Notes for cash at any time subsequent to
October 1, 2014 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes. Holders
have the right to require Sonic to purchase the 5.0% Convertible Notes on each of October 1, 2014,
October 1, 2019 and October 1, 2024 or in the event of a change in control for cash at a purchase
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes.
Holders of the 5.0% Convertible Notes may convert their notes at their option prior to the
close of business on the business day immediately preceding July 1, 2029 only under the following
circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter commencing after December 31, 2009, if the last
reported sale price of the Class A common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not
consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
preceding fiscal quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price on
each applicable trading day; (2) during the five business day period after any 10 consecutive
trading day period (the measurement period) in which the trading price (as defined below) per
$1,000 principal amount of notes for each day of that measurement period was less than 98% of the
product of the last reported sale price of Sonics Class A common stock and the applicable
conversion rate on each such day; (3) if Sonic calls any or all of the notes for redemption, at any
time prior to the close of business on the third scheduled trading day prior to the redemption
date; or (4) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. On and after July 1, 2029, to (and
including) the close of business on the third scheduled trading day immediately preceding the
maturity date, holders may convert their notes at any time, regardless of the foregoing
circumstances. The conversion rate is 74.7245 shares of Class A common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of notes, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $13.38 per share of
Class A common stock. None of the conversion features of the 5.0% Convertible Notes were triggered
in the first quarter ended March 31, 2011.
To recognize the equity component of a convertible borrowing instrument, upon issuance of the
5.0% Convertible Notes in September 2009, Sonic recorded a debt discount of $31.0 million and a
corresponding amount (net of taxes of $12.8 million) to equity, based on an estimated
non-convertible borrowing rate of 10.5%. The debt discount is being amortized to interest expense
through October 2014, the earliest redemption date. The unamortized debt discount was $23.3 million
and $24.7 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Sonic incurred interest expense related to the 5.0% Convertible Notes of approximately $2.2
million for each of the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, recorded to interest expense,
other, net, in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. In addition,
Sonic recorded interest expense associated with the amortization of debt discount and deferred loan
costs on the 5.0% Convertible Notes of $1.7 million and $1.5 million for the first quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, recorded to interest expense, non-cash, convertible debt in
the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Mortgage Notes
Mortgage notes require monthly payments of principal and interest through maturity and are
secured by the underlying properties. Maturity dates range between June 2013 and December 2031. The
weighted average interest rate was 4.99% at March 31, 2011. Sonic purchased five dealership
properties in January 2011 for $75.2 million which it previously occupied under operating lease
agreements. The properties were purchased utilizing cash on hand and borrowings under the 2010
Credit Facilities. During the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, Sonic secured mortgages on these
properties totaling $54.0 million and used the proceeds from these mortgages to pay down borrowings
under the 2010 Credit Facilities.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
At March 31, 2011 Sonic had interest rate swap agreements (the Fixed Swaps) to effectively
convert a portion of its LIBOR-based variable rate debt to a fixed rate. The fair value of these
swap positions at March 31, 2011 was a liability of $29.2 million included in Other Long-Term
Liabilities in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under the terms of
the Fixed Swaps, Sonic will receive and pay interest based on the following:
12
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Notional | Pay Rate | Receive Rate (1) | Maturing Date | ||||||
(In millions) | |||||||||
$ | 200.0 | 4.935% | one-month LIBOR |
May 1, 2012 | |||||
$ | 100.0 | 5.265% | one-month LIBOR |
June 1, 2012 | |||||
$ | 3.5 | 7.100% | one-month LIBOR |
July 10, 2017 | |||||
$ | 25.0 | (2) | 5.160% | one-month LIBOR |
September 1, 2012 | ||||
$ | 15.0 | (2) | 4.965% | one-month LIBOR |
September 1, 2012 | ||||
$ | 25.0 | (2) | 4.885% | one-month LIBOR |
October 1, 2012 | ||||
$ | 11.1 | 4.655% | one-month LIBOR |
December 10, 2017 | |||||
$ | 8.6 | 6.860% | one-month LIBOR |
August 1, 2017 | |||||
$ | 6.8 | 4.330% | one-month LIBOR |
July 1, 2013 | |||||
$ | 100.0 | (3) | 3.280% | one-month LIBOR |
July 1, 2015 | ||||
$ | 100.0 | (3) | 3.300% | one-month LIBOR |
July 1, 2015 | ||||
$ | 7.3 | 6.410% | one-month LIBOR |
September 12, 2017 | |||||
$ | 50.0 | (3) | 2.767% | one-month LIBOR |
July 1, 2014 | ||||
$ | 50.0 | (3) | 3.240% | one-month LIBOR |
July 1, 2015 | ||||
$ | 50.0 | (3) | 2.610% | one-month LIBOR |
July 1, 2014 | ||||
$ | 50.0 | (3) | 3.070% | one-month LIBOR |
July 1, 2015 |
(1) The one-month LIBOR rate was 0.244% at March 31, 2011.
(2) After December 31, 2009 changes in fair value are recorded through earnings.
(3) The effective date of these forward-starting swaps is July 2, 2012.
During the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, Sonic entered into four $50.0 million
notional forward-starting interest rate swap agreements which become effective in July 2012. Two of
the agreements terminate in July 2014 and the other two agreements terminate in July 2015. These
interest rate swaps have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and, as a result, changes
in the fair value of these swaps are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net
of related income taxes, in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity.
For the first quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, a non-cash benefit of $0.2 million and a
non-cash charge of $1.7 million, respectively, related to the Fixed Swaps not designated as hedges
and amortization of amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to terminated
cash flow swaps were included in interest expense/amortization, non-cash, cash flow swaps in the
accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
For the Fixed Swaps which qualify as cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of these
swaps have been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of related income
taxes, in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity. The incremental
interest expense (the difference between interest paid and interest received) related to the Fixed
Swaps was $4.4 million and $5.0 million for the first quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. This expense is included in interest expense, other, net, in the accompanying
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The estimated net expense expected to be
reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into results of operations during
the next twelve months is approximately $10.8 million.
7.
Per Share Data and Stockholders Equity
The calculation of diluted earnings per share considers the potential dilutive effect of
Sonics contingently convertible debt issuances and stock options to purchase shares of Class A
common stock under several equity compensation plans. The following table illustrates the dilutive
effect of such items on earnings per share for the first quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
13
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the First Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From Continuing | From Discontinued | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operations | Operations | Net Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Per | Per | Per | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Shares | Amount | Share Amount | Amount | Share Amount | Amount | Share Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) and Shares |
52,416 | $ | 15,791 | $ | (827 | ) | $ | 14,964 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Participating Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-vested Restricted Stock
and Stock Units |
- | (206 | ) | - | (206 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) and Shares |
52,416 | $ | 15,585 | $ | 0.30 | $ | (827 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 14,758 | $ | 0.28 | |||||||||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contingently Convertible
Debt ( 5.0% Convertible Notes) |
12,890 | 2,310 | - | 2,310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Compensation Plans |
644 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) and Shares |
65,950 | $ | 17,895 | $ | 0.27 | $ | (827 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 17,068 | $ | 0.26 | |||||||||||||
For the First Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From Continuing | From Discontinued | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operations | Operations | Net Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Per | Per | Per | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Shares | Amount | Share Amount | Amount | Share Amount | Amount | Share Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) and Shares |
51,889 | $ | 6,566 | $ | (2,412 | ) | $ | 4,154 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Participating Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-vested Restricted Stock
and Stock Units |
- | (79 | ) | - | (79 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) and Shares |
51,889 | $ | 6,487 | $ | 0.13 | $ | (2,412 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 4,075 | $ | 0.08 | |||||||||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Compensation Plans |
690 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) and Shares |
52,579 | $ | 6,487 | $ | 0.12 | $ | (2,412 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 4,075 | $ | 0.08 | |||||||||||||
In addition to the stock options included in the table above, options to purchase
approximately 2.3 million shares and 2.4 million shares of Class A common stock were outstanding at
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively, but were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the options were not dilutive. In addition, in the event the
effect of potentially dilutive shares associated with any of Sonics convertible notes were
anti-dilutive, the effect of those shares have also been excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share.
8.
Contingencies
Legal and Other Proceedings:
Sonic is a defendant in the matter of Galura, et al. v. Sonic Automotive, Inc., a private
civil action filed in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida. In this action, originally
filed on December 30, 2002, the plaintiffs allege that Sonic and its Florida dealerships sold an
antitheft protection product in a deceptive or otherwise illegal manner, and further sought
representation on behalf of any customer of any of Sonics Florida dealerships who purchased the
antitheft protection product since December 30, 1998. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages
and injunctive relief on behalf of this class of customers. In June 2005, the court granted the
plaintiffs motion for certification of the requested class of customers, but the court has made no
finding to date regarding actual liability in this lawsuit. Sonic subsequently filed a notice of
appeal of the courts class certification ruling with the Florida Court of Appeals. In April 2007,
the Florida Court of Appeals affirmed a portion of the trial courts class certification, and
overruled a portion of the trial courts class certification. In November 2009, the Florida trial
court granted Summary Judgment in Sonics favor against Plaintiff Enrique Galura, and his claim has
been dismissed. Marisa Hazeltons claim is still pending. Sonic currently intends to continue its
vigorous appeal and defense
14
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
of this lawsuit and to assert available defenses. However, an adverse resolution of this lawsuit
could result in the payment of significant costs and damages, which could have a material adverse
effect on Sonics future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. At a mediation
held February 4, 2011, Sonic reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle this
class action lawsuit, and a settlement agreement was signed by the parties on March 1, 2011. The
settlement agreement remains conditioned upon receiving final approval by the Florida state court.
In the event that a definitive settlement of this lawsuit is finalized upon terms and conditions
consistent with the settlement agreement, such a settlement would not have a material adverse
effect on Sonics future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Several private civil actions have been filed against Sonic Automotive, Inc. and several of
its dealership subsidiaries that purport to represent classes of customers as potential plaintiffs
and made allegations that certain products sold in the finance and insurance departments were done
so in a deceptive or otherwise illegal manner. One of these private civil actions was filed on
November 15, 2004 in South Carolina state court, York County Court of Common Pleas, against Sonic
Automotive, Inc. and 10 of Sonics South Carolina subsidiaries. The plaintiffs in that lawsuit were
Misty J. Owens, James B. Wright, Vincent J. Astey and Joseph Lee Williams, on behalf of themselves
and all other persons similarly situated, with plaintiffs seeking monetary damages and injunctive
relief on behalf of the purported class. The group of plaintiffs attorneys representing the
plaintiffs in the South Carolina lawsuit also filed another private civil class action lawsuit
against Sonic Automotive, Inc. and 3 of its subsidiaries on February 14, 2005 in state court in
North Carolina, Lincoln County Superior Court, which similarly sought certification of a
multi-state class of plaintiffs and alleged that certain products sold in the finance and insurance
departments were done so in a deceptive or otherwise illegal manner. The plaintiffs in this North
Carolina lawsuit were Robert Price, Carolyn Price, Marcus Cappeletti and Kathy Cappeletti, on
behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, with plaintiffs seeking monetary
damages and injunctive relief on behalf of the purported class. The South Carolina state court
action and the North Carolina state court action have since been consolidated into a single
proceeding in private arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. On November 12,
2008, claimants in the consolidated arbitration filed a Motion for Class Certification as a
national class action including all of the states in which Sonic operates dealerships. Claimants
are seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief on behalf of this class of customers. The
parties have briefed and argued the issue of class certification.
On July 19, 2010, the Arbitrator issued a Partial Final Award on Class Certification,
certifying a class which includes all customers who, on or after November 15, 2000, purchased or
leased from a Sonic dealership a vehicle with the Etch product as part of the transaction, but not
including customers who purchased or leased such vehicles from a Sonic dealership in Florida. The
Partial Final Award on Class Certification is not a final decision on the merits of the action. The
merits of Claimants assertions and potential damages will still have to be proven through the
remainder of the arbitration. The Arbitrator stayed the Arbitration for thirty days to allow either
party to petition a court of competent jurisdiction to confirm or vacate the award. Sonic will seek
review of the class certification ruling by a court of competent jurisdiction and will continue to
press its argument that this action is not suitable for a class-based arbitration. On July 22,
2010, the plaintiffs in this consolidated arbitration filed a Motion to Confirm the Arbitrators
Partial Final Award on Class Certification in state court in North Carolina, Lincoln County
Superior Court. On August 17, 2010, Sonic filed to remove this North Carolina state court action to
federal court, and simultaneously filed a Petition to Vacate the Arbitrators Partial Final Award
on Class Certification, with both filings made in the United Stated District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina. Sonic intends to continue its vigorous defense of this arbitration and
to assert all available defenses. However, an adverse resolution of this arbitration could result
in the payment of significant costs and damages, which could have a material adverse effect on
Sonics future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Sonic is involved, and expects to continue to be involved, in numerous legal and
administrative proceedings arising out of the conduct of its business, including regulatory
investigations and private civil actions brought by plaintiffs purporting to represent a potential
class or for which a class has been certified. Although Sonic vigorously defends itself in all
legal and administrative proceedings, the outcomes of pending and future proceedings arising out of
the conduct of Sonics business, including litigation with customers, employment related lawsuits,
contractual disputes, class actions, purported class actions and actions brought by governmental
authorities, cannot be predicted with certainty. An unfavorable resolution of one or more of these
matters could have a material adverse effect on Sonics business, financial condition, results of
operations, cash flows or prospects. Included in other accrued liabilities at both March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 was $9.1 million in reserves that Sonic has provided for pending proceedings.
Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations:
In connection with franchise dispositions, certain of Sonics dealership subsidiaries have
assigned or sublet to the buyer its interests in real property leases associated with such
dealerships. In general, Sonics dealership subsidiaries retain responsibility for the performance
of certain obligations under such leases, including rent payments and repairs to leased
15
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
property upon termination of the lease, to the extent that the assignee or sub-lessee does not
perform. In the event the sub-lessees do not perform under their obligations Sonic remains liable
for the lease payments. The total amount relating to this risk was approximately $106.2 million as
of December 31, 2010. See Sonics Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010
for further discussion.
In accordance with the terms of agreements entered into for the sale of Sonics franchises,
Sonic generally agrees to indemnify the buyer from certain exposure and costs arising subsequent to
the date of sale, including environmental exposure and exposure resulting from the breach of
representations or warranties made in accordance with the agreement. While Sonics exposure with
respect to environmental remediation and repairs is difficult to quantify, Sonic estimates that the
maximum exposure associated with these general indemnifications if the counterparties failed to
perform under their contractual obligations was approximately $10.5 million and $12.8 million at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. These indemnifications expire within a period
of one to two years following the date of sale. The estimated fair value of these indemnifications
was not material. Sonic also guarantees the floor plan commitments of its 50% owned joint venture,
the amount of which was $4.5 million at both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
9.
Fair Value Measurements
In determining fair value, Sonic uses various valuation approaches including market, income
and/or cost approaches. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures in the Accounting Standards
Codification (the ASC) establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that
maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring
that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from sources independent of Sonic. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect Sonics assumptions
about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed
based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into
three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
Level 1 Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that Sonic has the ability to access. Assets utilizing Level 1
inputs include marketable securities that are actively traded.
Level 2 Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or
for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Assets
and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include cash flow swap instruments.
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to
the overall fair value measurement. Asset and liability measurements utilizing Level 3
inputs include those used in estimating fair value of non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities in purchase acquisitions, those used in assessing impairment
of property, plant and equipment and other intangibles and those used in the reporting
unit valuation in the first step of the annual goodwill impairment evaluation. For
instance, certain assets held for sale in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets are valued based on estimated proceeds to be received in
connection with the disposal of those assets.
The availability of observable inputs can vary and is affected by a wide variety of factors.
To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable
in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of
judgment required by Sonic in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in
Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of
the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value
hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed is determined based on the lowest
level input (Level 3 being the lowest level) that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant
who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even
when market assumptions are not readily available, Sonics own assumptions are set to reflect those
that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Sonic
uses inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods when the market
may be abnormally high or abnormally low. Accordingly, fair value measurements can be volatile
based on various factors that may or may not be within Sonics control.
Assets or liabilities recorded at fair value in the accompanying balance sheet as of March 31,
2011 are as follows:
16
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair Value at Reporting Date Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Swaps Designated as Hedges (1) |
$ | (22.8 | ) | $ | - | $ | (22.8 | ) | $ | - | ||||||
Cash Flow Swaps not Designated as Hedges (1) |
(6.4 | ) | - | (6.4 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | (29.2 | ) | $ | - | $ | (29.2 | ) | $ | - | ||||||
(1) - Included in Other Long-Term Liabilities in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair values of Sonics financial instruments
including receivables, notes receivable from finance contracts, notes
payable-floor plan, trade
accounts payable, borrowings under the revolving credit facilities and certain mortgage notes
approximate their carrying values due either to length of maturity or existence of variable
interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates.
The fair value and carrying value of Sonics fixed rate long-term debt was as follows:
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
9.0% Senior Subordinated Notes (1) |
$ | 224,175 | $ | 208,663 | $ | 220,836 | $ | 208,630 | ||||||||
8.625% Senior Subordinated Notes (1) |
$ | 43,498 | $ | 42,688 | $ | 43,498 | $ | 42,673 | ||||||||
5.0% Convertible Senior Notes (1) |
$ | 230,503 | $ | 149,192 | $ | 215,453 | $ | 147,824 | ||||||||
Mortgage Notes (2) |
$ | 121,248 | $ | 123,926 | $ | 88,119 | $ | 88,262 | ||||||||
Notes Payable to a Finance Company (2) |
$ | 15,100 | $ | 16,700 | $ | 15,676 | $ | 17,427 | ||||||||
Other (2) |
$ | 5,272 | $ | 5,703 | $ | 5,311 | $ | 5,751 |
(1) | As determined by market quotations as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (Level 1). |
|
(2) | As determined by discounted cash flows (Level 3). |
17
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition
should be read in conjunction with the Sonic Automotive, Inc. and Subsidiaries Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report,
as well as the audited financial statements and related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations appearing in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Overview
We are one of the largest automotive retailers in the United States. As of March 31, 2011, we
operated 136 dealership franchises, representing 29 different brands of cars and light trucks, at
119 locations and 24 collision repair centers in 15 states. Our dealerships provide comprehensive
services including sales of both new and used cars and light trucks, sales of replacement parts,
performance of vehicle maintenance, manufacturer warranty repairs, paint and collision repair
services, and arrangement of extended service contracts, financing, insurance and other aftermarket
products for our customers.
In March 2011, a powerful earthquake off the coast of Japan produced a massive tsunami,
affecting certain east coast regions of Japan. The effects of the earthquake and tsunami caused
widespread damage and destruction of property and localized disruption of the power supply. These
events have disrupted our Japanese manufacturer partners supply-chain and vehicle production capacity. As
Japan continues to focus on recovering from this natural disaster, it is uncertain as to the
continuing effects this event may have on these manufacturer partners supply-chain and production.
Although these events did not affect our business in the first quarter of 2011, we are currently
experiencing lower allocations of new vehicle inventory from the Japanese import brands, which may
affect new vehicle revenues, new vehicle gross margins, consumer brand preferences and our ability
to source used inventory through trades as we progress through the second quarter. We expect to
experience a shift in demand for our Japanese import brands from new vehicles to used vehicles which may help mitigate the effects
of the period of lower new vehicle supply. We may see an increase in
acquisition costs of certain new and
used vehicles if demand is consistent with the demand experienced in March 2011. We could also
experience higher costs for certain replacement parts which may have had production disruptions
caused by the earthquake and tsunami, however, it is unclear whether we will be able to pass the
effects of these higher costs to our customers. Although we believe the majority of the effects
will be experienced in our Japanese brands, we also believe most vehicle manufacturers will
experience some production disruption due to the effects of this event on the automotive
supply-chain. We may experience these, and potentially other, effects as we progress through the
second quarter. The duration of the anticipated shortfall in new vehicle supply is unknown.
The following is a detail of our new vehicle revenues by brand for the first quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010:
18
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Percentage of New Vehicle Revenue | ||||
First Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
Brand
(1) |
||||
BMW |
16.6% | 16.1% | ||
Honda |
14.7% | 14.3% | ||
Toyota |
10.6% | 11.0% | ||
Ford |
8.9% | 9.0% | ||
Mercedes |
8.5% | 10.7% | ||
General Motors (2) |
8.2% | 6.5% | ||
Cadillac |
5.4% | 5.4% | ||
Lexus |
5.1% | 6.5% | ||
Other (3) |
4.6% | 3.2% | ||
Audi |
3.1% | 3.1% | ||
Volkswagen |
2.5% | 2.1% | ||
Hyundai |
2.1% | 2.0% | ||
Land Rover |
2.0% | 1.9% | ||
Porsche |
1.7% | 1.7% | ||
Volvo |
1.4% | 1.3% | ||
Infiniti |
1.2% | 1.5% | ||
Nissan |
1.2% | 1.6% | ||
Acura |
1.0% | 1.0% | ||
Other Luxury (4) |
0.9% | 0.9% | ||
Chrysler (5) |
0.3% | 0.2% | ||
Total |
100.0% | 100.0% | ||
(1) | In accordance with the provisions of Presentation of Financial Statements in the Accounting
Standards Codification (the ASC), prior period income statement data reflects reclassifications
to (i) exclude franchises sold, identified for sale, or terminated subsequent to March 31, 2010
which had not been previously included in discontinued operations or (ii) include franchises
previously held for sale which subsequently were reclassified to held and used. See Notes 1 and 2
to our accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements which discuss these and
other factors that affect the comparability of the information for the periods presented. |
||
(2) | Includes Buick, Chevrolet and GMC. |
||
(3) | Includes Kia, Mini, Scion and Subaru. |
||
(4) | Includes Hummer, Jaguar and Saab. |
||
(5) | Includes Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep. |
Results of Operations
The following discussions are based on reported figures. Same store amounts do not vary
significantly from reported totals since there were no significant dealership franchise
acquisitions subsequent to December 31, 2009.
New Vehicles
The automobile retail industry uses the Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) to measure
the amount of new vehicle unit sales activity within the United States market. The SAAR averages
below reflect a blended average of all brands marketed or sold in the United States market. The
SAAR includes brands we do not sell and locations in which we do not operate.
First Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | % Change | ||||||||||
SAAR (in millions of vehicles)
|
13.0 | 11.0 | 18.2 | % |
Source: Bloomberg Financial Markets, via Stephens Inc. |
19
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our reported new vehicle (including fleet) results are as follows:
For the First Quarter Ended March 31, | Better / (Worse) | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except units and per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 980,745 | $ | 778,244 | $ | 202,501 | 26.0 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 60,059 | $ | 52,581 | $ | 7,478 | 14.2 | % | ||||||||
Unit sales |
29,384 | 23,132 | 6,252 | 27.0 | % | |||||||||||
Revenue per unit |
$ | 33,377 | $ | 33,644 | $ | (267 | ) | (0.8 | %) | |||||||
Gross profit per unit |
$ | 2,044 | $ | 2,273 | $ | (229 | ) | (10.1 | %) | |||||||
Gross profit as a % of revenue |
6.1% | 6.8% | (70 | ) | bps |
The increase in new vehicle revenues for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 was
driven by a 27.0% increase in our unit sales volume. Our new unit volume increase was led by our
Honda, General Motors (including Cadillac) and BMW/Mini dealerships, which accounted for 60.9% of
the year-over-year increase. This increase in new vehicle volume also contributed to a 21.9%
increase in our finance, insurance and other (F&I) revenue as further discussed below. The
majority of our brands significantly outperformed their local industry volume increase for their
respective brand.
New vehicle gross profit benefited from the higher sales volume which more than offset a 10.1%
decrease in gross profit per unit. Gross profit per unit was $2,044, down $229 per unit from the
prior year primarily as a result of decreases at our mid-line import dealerships.
Our luxury stores experienced a new vehicle revenue increase of 20.2% for the first quarter
ended March 31, 2011, compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to a 19.5% increase in
new unit volume. Our Cadillac and BMW/Mini dealerships contributed to the revenue increase,
improving 24.8% and 34.7%, respectively. Luxury new vehicle gross profit per unit decreased 1.5%
from the prior year period primarily due to declines in Mercedes, Lexus and Cadillac gross profit
per unit, however, BMW/Mini and Audi gross profit per unit increased 6.5% and 10.3%, respectively.
Total luxury gross profit dollars were up 17.8% as a result of the higher sales volume. Gross
profit as a percentage of revenue at our luxury dealerships was relatively flat.
Our mid-line import new vehicle revenue improved 29.1% compared to the same prior year period
primarily due to volume increases at our Honda, Toyota and Volkswagen dealerships. Gross profit per
unit declined 21.2%, primarily due to a 29.4% decrease in gross profit per unit at our Honda
dealerships. Overall mid-line import gross profit was up 2.1%, led by our Hyundai and Volkswagen
brands.
Our domestic stores experienced a new vehicle revenue increase of 39.3% for the first quarter
ended March 31, 2011, compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to a 58.4% increase in
new vehicle revenue from our General Motors (excluding Cadillac) dealerships. New vehicle revenue,
gross profit and unit volume increased across all domestic brands. Domestic fleet gross profit
(included in the discussion above) increased 30.2% largely due to a 25.6% increase in fleet unit
volume.
20
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Used Vehicles
Our reported used vehicle results are as follows:
For the First Quarter Ended March 31, | Better / (Worse) | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except units and per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 482,031 | $ | 418,849 | $ | 63,182 | 15.1 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 38,244 | $ | 34,778 | $ | 3,466 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||
Unit sales |
25,245 | 21,492 | 3,753 | 17.5 | % | |||||||||||
Revenue per unit |
$ | 19,094 | $ | 19,489 | $ | (395 | ) | (2.0 | %) | |||||||
Gross profit per unit |
$ | 1,515 | $ | 1,618 | $ | (103 | ) | (6.4 | %) | |||||||
Gross profit as a % of revenue |
7.9% | 8.3% | (40 | ) | bps | |||||||||||
CPO revenue |
$ | 209,433 | $ | 204,199 | $ | 5,234 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
CPO unit sales |
7,914 | 7,611 | 303 | 4.0 | % |
The increase in used vehicle unit volume is primarily due to the continued implementation of
our standardized used vehicle merchandising process. This process allows us to purchase and price
our used vehicles more competitively, market them more effectively and physically move certain used
vehicles to specific dealerships within a particular region that have shown success in retailing
that specific type of used vehicle.
The reduction in gross profit per unit was due in part to the higher cost of units sold. Costs
were higher as a result of acquiring more used vehicle inventory through auctions (generally higher
cost than acquiring through trade) than through trades. However, obtaining a greater number of used
vehicles from auction allowed us to better implement our standardized used vehicle merchandising
process, allowing us to optimize the mix of used vehicles at each dealership, increasing unit sales
and overall gross profit.
Wholesale Vehicles
Our reported wholesale results are as follows:
For the First Quarter Ended March 31, | Better / (Worse) | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except units and per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 35,362 | $ | 30,806 | $ | 4,556 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||
Gross loss |
$ | (456 | ) | $ | (658 | ) | $ | 202 | 30.7 | % | ||||||
Unit sales |
5,644 | 5,128 | 516 | 10.1 | % | |||||||||||
Revenue per unit |
$ | 6,265 | $ | 6,007 | $ | 258 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||
Gross loss per unit |
$ | (81 | ) | $ | (128 | ) | $ | 47 | 36.7 | % | ||||||
Gross loss as a % of revenue |
(1.3% | ) | (2.1% | ) | 80 | bps |
For the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, wholesale gross loss per unit declined
compared to the same prior year period. This is primarily due to the increased focus on retailing
used vehicles (at a potential higher profit) that were previously disposed through our wholesale
channels, as well as increased demand for vehicles at auction which drives up auction prices. See
previous heading, Used Vehicles.
21
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Parts, Service and Collision Repair (Fixed Operations)
Our reported fixed operations results are as follows:
For the First Quarter Ended March 31, | Better / (Worse) | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Parts |
$ | 154,713 | $ | 146,030 | $ | 8,683 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||
Service |
125,506 | 117,104 | 8,402 | 7.2 | % | |||||||||||
Collision repair |
11,551 | 12,038 | (487 | ) | (4.0 | %) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 291,770 | $ | 275,172 | $ | 16,598 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit |
||||||||||||||||
Parts |
$ | 50,472 | $ | 48,889 | $ | 1,583 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||
Service |
86,944 | 83,002 | 3,942 | 4.7 | % | |||||||||||
Collision repair |
6,437 | 6,692 | (255 | ) | (3.8 | %) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 143,853 | $ | 138,583 | $ | 5,270 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit as a % of revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Parts |
32.6 | % | 33.5 | % | (90 | ) | bps | |||||||||
Service |
69.3 | % | 70.9 | % | (160 | ) | bps | |||||||||
Collision repair |
55.7 | % | 55.6 | % | 10 | bps | ||||||||||
Total |
49.3 | % | 50.4 | % | (110 | ) | bps |
For the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, our domestic, mid-line import and luxury
brands all experienced increases in overall fixed operations revenue compared to the same prior
year period, increasing 5.2%, 6.0% and 6.3%, respectively. These improvements were led by
significant increases in our BMW, Lexus, Ford, Honda and Toyota dealerships overall fixed
operations revenue.
Overall fixed operations customer pay revenue increased 0.9% for the first quarter ended March
31, 2011, compared to the same prior year period. Our mid-line import and luxury customer pay
increased 1.7% and 1.4%, respectively, but domestic customer pay decreased 2.9% for the first
quarter compared to the same prior year period. Warranty revenue increased 10.8% for the first
quarter ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to increases at our Lexus and BMW dealerships.
The decrease in our overall fixed operations gross margin rate is primarily due to lower
customer pay and internal margin rates compared to the same prior year period. Warranty gross
margin rates increased 10 basis points for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
same prior year period primarily due to parts warranty margin improvements.
Finance, Insurance and Other (F&I)
Our reported F&I results are as follows:
For the First Quarter Ended March 31, | Better / (Worse) | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 49,468 | $ | 40,595 | $ | 8,873 | 21.9 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit per retail unit (excluding fleet) |
$ | 949 | $ | 947 | $ | 2 | 0.2 | % |
F&I revenue increased 21.9% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to an
increase of 21.6% in new and used retail unit volume compared to the same prior year period. New
and used finance contract gross revenue improved 22.3% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011
compared to the same prior year period due to the increase in unit volume and a 210 basis point
increase in finance contract penetration rates. New and used service contract gross revenue
increased 21.4% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same prior year period
in spite of a 160 basis point decrease in service contract penetration rates as a result of unit
volume increases and a 5.9% increase in gross revenue per service contract.
22
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
SG&A expenses are comprised of four major groups: compensation expense, advertising expense,
rent and rent related expense and other expense. Compensation expense primarily relates to
dealership personnel who are paid a commission or a modest salary plus commission (which typically
vary depending on gross profits realized) and support personnel who are paid a fixed salary. Due to
the salary component for certain dealership and corporate personnel, gross profits and compensation
expense do not change in direct proportion to one another. Advertising expense and other expenses
vary based on the level of actual or anticipated business activity and number of dealerships owned.
Rent and rent related expense typically varies with the number of dealerships owned, investments
made for facility improvements and interest rates. Although SG&A expenses do not move exactly in
proportion with changes in gross profit, we believe the best way to measure SG&A expenses is as a
percentage of gross profit. Following is information related to our SG&A expenses:
For the First Quarter Ended March 31, | Better / (Worse) | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Compensation |
$ | 136,565 | $ | 128,890 | $ | (7,675 | ) | (6.0 | %) | |||||||
Advertising |
13,782 | 11,175 | (2,607 | ) | (23.3 | %) | ||||||||||
Rent and rent related |
30,416 | 32,850 | 2,434 | 7.4 | % | |||||||||||
Other |
51,751 | 47,738 | (4,013 | ) | (8.4 | %) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 232,514 | $ | 220,653 | $ | (11,861 | ) | (5.4 | %) | |||||||
SG&A as a % of gross profit |
||||||||||||||||
Compensation |
46.9 | % | 48.5 | % | (160 | ) | bps | |||||||||
Advertising |
4.7 | % | 4.2 | % | (50 | ) | bps | |||||||||
Rent and rent related |
10.4 | % | 12.4 | % | 200 | bps | ||||||||||
Other |
17.9 | % | 17.9 | % | (0 | ) | bps | |||||||||
Total |
79.9 | % | 83.0 | % | 310 | bps |
The increase in overall SG&A expense dollars can largely be attributed to increases in
revenues and gross profit. Overall SG&A expense as a percentage of gross profit improved 310 basis
points, led by improvements in rent and compensation costs.
Compensation costs as a percentage of gross profit decreased 160 basis points in the first
quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to higher gross
profit in the current year and efforts to more closely align compensation with target levels of
profit performance in 2011.
Total advertising costs as a percentage of gross profit increased for the first quarter ended
March 31, 2011 compared to the same prior year period primarily due to higher overall spending to
improve market share.
Rent and rent related expenses decreased as a percentage of gross profit for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 compared to the same prior year period primarily due to higher gross profit levels
and the purchase of certain properties which were previously leased.
For the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, other SG&A expenses increased from the prior year
period primarily due to increases in customer related costs as a result of the higher level of
sales activity compared to the prior year period and the timing of certain insurance expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.6 million, or 18.7%, for the first quarter
ended March 31, 2011, compared to the same prior year period. These increases are primarily related
to the five dealership properties that we purchased during the first quarter ended March 31, 2011
which we previously leased through long-term operating leases. In addition, we completed
approximately $17.2 million of construction projects which were placed into service during the
first quarter ended March 31, 2011.
23
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest Expense, Floor Plan
Floor plan interest expense for new vehicles increased approximately $0.5 million, or 12.1%,
for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared to the first quarter ended March 31, 2010. The
weighted average new vehicle floor plan interest rate incurred by continuing dealerships decreased
slightly to 2.62% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared to the first quarter ended
March 31, 2010 which had a weighted average rate of 2.64%. The weighted average floor plan balance
for new vehicles increased by approximately $86.6 million for the first quarter ended March 31,
2011 compared to the same prior year period.
Floor plan interest expense for used vehicles increased approximately $0.1 million, or 24.8%,
for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared to the first quarter ended March 31, 2010. The
weighted average used vehicle floor plan interest rate incurred by continuing dealerships increased
to 2.64% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, up from 2.07% for the first quarter ended
March 31, 2010.
Interest Expense, Other, Net
The change in interest expense, other, net, between the first quarters ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 is summarized in the table below:
First Quarter | |||||
Ended March 31 | |||||
Increase (Decrease) | |||||
in Interest Expense | |||||
(In millions) | |||||
Debt
balances |
|||||
- Increase (decrease) in debt balances |
$ | (0.5 | ) | ||
Other
factors |
|||||
- (Increase) decrease in capitalized interest |
(0.4 | ) | |||
- Incremental interest expense (benefit) related to variable to fixed rate swaps (1) |
(0.6 | ) | |||
- (Increase) decrease in interest expense allocation to discontinued operations |
0.1 | ||||
- Increase (decrease) in other expense, net |
(0.3 | ) | |||
Total |
$ | (1.7 | ) | ||
(1) | Represent difference in cash payments to and from the counterparty. |
For approximately half of the month of March 2010, we carried and incurred interest
expense for both the 9.0% Notes issued March 12, 2010 and the $200.0 million in aggregate principal
of our 8.625% Notes which we redeemed on April 12, 2010 using the net proceeds from the 9.0% Notes
issuance and cash on hand. As such, this double carry effect increased our interest expense by
approximately $0.9 million, which partially offset the amount shown in the decrease in debt
balances caption in the table above.
Interest Expense, Non-Cash, Convertible Debt
Non-cash convertible debt interest expense is comprised of the amortization of the debt
discount and deferred loan costs associated with our various convertible notes. The initial debt
discount was determined based on a valuation of the debt component of these notes and is being
amortized monthly to interest expense over the life of the notes. See our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for a discussion of the adoption of Debt with Conversion
and Other Options in the ASC.
Interest Expense/Amortization, Non-Cash, Cash Flow Swaps
We have entered into the Fixed Swaps to effectively convert a portion of our LIBOR-based
variable rate debt to a fixed rate, in order to reduce our exposure to market risks from
fluctuations in interest rates. For the first quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, a
non-cash benefit and non-cash charge of approximately $0.2 million and $1.7 million,
24
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
respectively, related to the Fixed Swaps and amortization of amounts in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) related to other existing and terminated cash flow swaps were included
in interest expense/amortization, non-cash, cash flow swaps in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income. Changes in the fair value of notional amounts of certain cash
flow swaps are recognized through earnings. See the heading Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities in Note 6 Long-Term Debt, in the accompanying notes to the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
For our Fixed Swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of these
swaps have been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of related income
taxes in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity. The incremental
interest expense (the difference between interest paid and interest received) related to the Fixed
Swaps was $4.4 million and $5.0 million for the first quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and is included in interest expense, other, net, in the accompanying Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The estimated net expense expected to be reclassified
out of other comprehensive income (loss) into results of operations during the next twelve months
is approximately $10.8 million.
Income Taxes
The overall effective tax rate from continuing operations was 40.0% and 43.0% for the first
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective rate for the first quarter
ended March 31, 2011 was lower than the same prior year period due to the level of overall taxable
income and the shift in the distribution of taxable income between states in which we operate. We
expect the effective tax rate for continuing operations in future periods to fall within a range of
38.0% to 41.0%.
Discontinued Operations
Significant components of results from discontinued operations were as follows:
First Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (373 | ) | $ | (2,605 | ) | ||
Gain on disposal of businesses |
25 | 270 | ||||||
Lease exit charges |
(925 | ) | (1,645 | ) | ||||
Pre-tax loss |
$ | (1,273 | ) | $ | (3,980 | ) | ||
Total revenues |
$ | | $ | 25,272 |
Loss from discontinued operations decreased for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011
compared to the same prior year period as a result of the disposition of several franchises during
2010. Lease exit charges recorded for the first quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 relate to
interest charges and the revision of estimates on previously established lease exit accruals. The
lease exit accruals represent the present value of the lease payments, net of estimated sublease
proceeds, for the remaining life of the operating leases and other accruals necessary to satisfy
the lease commitment to the landlord.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require cash to fund debt service, operating lease obligations, working capital
requirements and to finance acquisitions. We rely on cash flows from operations, borrowings under
our revolving credit and floor plan borrowing arrangements, real estate mortgage financing, asset
sales and offerings of debt and equity securities to meet these requirements. Our liquidity could
be negatively affected if we fail to comply with the financial covenants in our existing debt or
lease arrangements. Cash flows provided by our dealerships are derived from various sources. The
primary sources include individual consumers, automobile manufacturers, automobile manufacturers
captive finance subsidiaries and finance companies. Disruptions in these cash flows can have a
material and adverse impact on our operations and overall liquidity.
25
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Because the majority of our consolidated assets are held by our dealership subsidiaries, the
majority of our cash flows from operations are generated by these subsidiaries. As a result, our
cash flows and ability to service our obligations depends to a substantial degree on the cash
generated from the operations of these dealership subsidiaries.
Floor Plan Facilities
The weighted average interest rate for all of our new vehicle floor plan facilities (both
continuing and discontinued operations) decreased slightly to 2.62% for the first quarter ended
March 31, 2011, compared to the first quarter ended March 31, 2010, which had a weighted average
rate of 2.66%. The weighted average interest rate for our used vehicle floor plan facility (both
continuing and discontinued operations) was 2.64% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011,
compared to 2.14% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Interest payments under each of our floor plan facilities are due monthly and we are not
required to make principal repayments prior to the sale of the floor plan financed vehicles. We
were in compliance with all restrictive covenants under our floor plan facilities as of March 31,
2011 and expect to be in compliance with the covenants for the foreseeable future.
Long-Term Debt and Credit Facilities
See Note 6, Long-Term Debt, in the notes to the accompanying Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our long-term debt and credit facilities and
compliance with debt covenants.
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures generally include the purchase of land and buildings, construction of
new dealerships and collision repair centers, building improvements and equipment purchased for use
in our dealerships. In the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, we purchased five dealership
properties for $75.2 million which we were previously leasing through long-term operating leases,
utilizing cash on hand and borrowings under the 2010 Credit Facilities. Subsequent to the purchase
date, we obtained mortgage funding of $54.0 million.
Capital expenditures for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, including this purchase of
previously leased properties, were approximately $90.6 million ($36.6 million, net of mortgage
funding of $54.0 million). As of March 31, 2011, contractual commitments to contractors for
facility construction projects totaled approximately $20.5 million.
Stock Repurchase Program
During the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 we repurchased approximately 292,000 shares of
our Class A common stock for approximately $3.9 million. Our Board of Directors has authorized us
to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock or redeem securities convertible into Class A
common stock. Historically, we have used our share repurchase authorization to offset dilution
caused by the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock awards and to maintain
our desired capital structure. At March 31, 2011, our remaining repurchase authorization was
approximately $39.6 million. Under our 2010 Credit Facilities, share repurchases are permitted to
the extent that no event of default exists and we are in compliance with the financial covenants
contained therein.
Dividends
During the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend
of $0.025 per share on all outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock as of March 15,
2011 to be paid on April 15, 2011. Subsequent to March 31, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a
cash dividend on all outstanding shares of common stock of $0.025 per share for shareholders of
record on June 15, 2011 to be paid on July 15, 2011. Under our 2010 Credit Facilities, dividends
are permitted to the extent that no event of default exists and we are in compliance with the
financial covenants contained therein. The indentures governing our outstanding 8.625% Notes and
9.0% Notes contain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. The payment of any future dividend
is subject to the business judgment of our Board of Directors, taking into consideration our
historic and projected results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, capital
requirements, covenant compliance, share repurchases, current economic environment and other
factors considered relevant. These factors are considered each quarter and will be scrutinized as
our Board of Directors determines our dividend policy throughout 2011. There is no guarantee that
additional dividends will be declared and paid at any time in the future. See Note 6, Long-
26
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Term Debt, in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a
description of restrictions on the payment of dividends.
Cash Flows
For the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, net cash provided by operating activities was
approximately $24.4 million. This provision of cash was comprised primarily of cash inflows related
to a reduction in receivables and an increase in trade accounts payable, partially offset by an
increase in inventories and a decrease in notes payable floor plan trade. Net cash used in
investing activities during the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $89.6 million.
This use of cash was primarily comprised of purchases of property and equipment. Net cash provided
by financing activities for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $51.7 million.
This provision of cash was primarily comprised of mortgage loan proceeds.
We arrange our inventory floor plan financing through both manufacturer captive finance
companies and a syndicate of manufacturer-affiliated finance companies and commercial banks. Our
floor plan financed with manufacturer captives is recorded as trade floor plan liabilities (with
the resulting change being reflected as an operating cash flow). Our dealerships that obtain floor
plan financing from a syndicate of manufacturer-affiliated finance companies and commercial banks
record their obligation as non-trade floor plan liabilities (with the resulting change being
reflected as a financing cash flow).
Due to the presentation differences for changes in trade floor plan and non-trade floor plan
in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, decisions made by us to move
dealership floor plan financing arrangements from one finance source to another may cause
significant variations in operating and financing cash flows without affecting our overall
liquidity, working capital or cash flow. Accordingly, if all changes in floor plan notes payable
were classified as an operating activity, the result would have been net cash provided by operating
activities of $28.1 million for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 and net cash used in
operating activities of $16.6 million for the first quarter ended March 31, 2010. The shift between
trade floor plan and non-trade floor plan during the first quarter ended March 31, 2010 was
primarily due to the realignment in floor plan providers under the new 2010 Credit Facilities.
Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations
In connection with the operation and disposition of dealership franchises, we have entered
into various guarantees and indemnification obligations. See Note 8, Contingencies, in the notes
to the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See also Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 12, Commitments
and Contingencies, in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Future Liquidity Outlook
We believe our best source of liquidity for operations and debt service remains cash flows
generated from operations combined with our availability of borrowings under our floor plan
facilities (or any replacements thereof), our 2010 Credit Facilities, real estate mortgage
financing, selected dealership and other asset sales and our ability to raise funds in the capital
markets. Because the majority of our consolidated assets are held by our dealership subsidiaries,
the majority of our cash flows from operations are generated by these subsidiaries. As a result,
our cash flows and ability to service debt depends to a substantial degree on the results of
operations of these subsidiaries and their ability to provide us with cash.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 for a description of our off-balance sheet arrangements.
Seasonality
Our operations are subject to seasonal variations. The first quarter normally contributes less
operating profit than the second, third and fourth quarters. Weather conditions, the timing of
manufacturer incentive programs and model changeovers cause seasonality and may adversely affect
vehicle demand, and consequently, our profitability. Comparatively, parts and service demand
remains more stable throughout the year.
27
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Our variable rate floor plan facilities, revolving credit facility borrowings and other
variable rate notes expose us to risks caused by fluctuations in the applicable interest rates. The
total outstanding balance of such instruments after considering the effect of our interest rate
swaps (see below) was approximately $509.0 million at March 31, 2011. A change of 100 basis points
in the underlying interest rate would have caused a change in interest expense of approximately
$1.3 million for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011, approximately $1.2 million of which would
have resulted from our floor plan facilities.
In addition to our variable rate debt, as of March 31, 2011, approximately 20% of our
dealership lease facilities have monthly lease payments that fluctuate based on LIBOR interest
rates. An increase in interest rates of 100 basis points would not have had a significant impact on
rent expense for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 due to the leases containing LIBOR floors
which were above the LIBOR rate during the quarter.
We also have the Fixed Swaps to effectively convert a portion of our LIBOR-based variable rate
debt to a fixed rate. Under the terms of the Fixed Swaps interest rates reset monthly. The fair
value of these swap positions at March 31, 2011 was a liability of $29.2 million included in Other
Long-Term Liabilities in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. See the
previous discussion of Interest Expense/Amortization, Non-Cash, Cash Flow Swaps in Item 2:
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We will
receive and pay interest based on the following:
Notional Amount | Pay Rate | Receive Rate (1) | Maturing Date | |||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
$ | 200.0 | 4.935%
|
one-month LIBOR | May 1, 2012 | ||||
$ | 100.0 | 5.265%
|
one-month LIBOR | June 1, 2012 | ||||
$ | 3.5 | 7.100%
|
one-month LIBOR | July 10, 2017 | ||||
$ | 25.0 | (2) | 5.160%
|
one-month LIBOR | September 1, 2012 | |||
$ | 15.0 | (2) | 4.965%
|
one-month LIBOR | September 1, 2012 | |||
$ | 25.0 | (2) | 4.885%
|
one-month LIBOR | October 1, 2012 | |||
$ | 11.1 | 4.655%
|
one-month LIBOR | December 10, 2017 | ||||
$ | 8.6 | 6.860%
|
one-month LIBOR | August 1, 2017 | ||||
$ | 6.8 | 4.330%
|
one-month LIBOR | July 1, 2013 | ||||
$ | 100.0 | (3) | 3.280% |
one-month LIBOR | July 1, 2015 | |||
$ | 100.0 | (3) | 3.300% |
one-month LIBOR | July 1, 2015 | |||
$ | 7.3 | 6.410% |
one-month LIBOR | September 12, 2017 | ||||
$ | 50.0 | (3) | 2.767% |
one-month LIBOR | July 1, 2014 | |||
$ | 50.0 | (3) | 3.240% |
one-month LIBOR | July 1, 2015 | |||
$ | 50.0 | (3) | 2.610% |
one-month LIBOR | July 1, 2014 | |||
$ | 50.0 | (3) | 3.070% |
one-month LIBOR | July 1, 2015 |
(1) | The one-month LIBOR rate was 0.244% at March 31, 2011. | ||
(2) | After December 31, 2009 changes in fair value are recorded through earnings. | ||
(3) | The effective date of these forward-starting swaps is July 2, 2012. |
Foreign Currency Risk
We purchase certain of our new vehicle and parts inventories from foreign manufacturers.
Although we purchase our inventories in U.S. dollars, our business is subject to foreign exchange
rate risk, which may influence automobile manufacturers ability to provide their products at
competitive prices in the United States. To the extent that we cannot recapture this volatility in
prices charged to customers or if this volatility negatively impacts consumer demand for our
products, this volatility could adversely affect our future operating results.
28
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 4: Controls and Procedures.
Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. During our
last fiscal quarter, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
29
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1: Legal Proceedings.
We are a defendant in the matter of Galura, et al. v. Sonic Automotive, Inc., a private civil
action filed in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida. In this action, originally filed
on December 30, 2002, the plaintiffs allege that we and our Florida dealerships sold an antitheft
protection product in a deceptive or otherwise illegal manner, and further sought representation on
behalf of any customer of any of our Florida dealerships who purchased the antitheft protection
product since December 30, 1998. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief
on behalf of this class of customers. In June 2005, the court granted the plaintiffs motion for
certification of the requested class of customers, but the court has made no finding to date
regarding actual liability in this lawsuit. We subsequently filed a notice of appeal of the courts
class certification ruling with the Florida Court of Appeals. In April 2007, the Florida Court of
Appeals affirmed a portion of the trial courts class certification, and overruled a portion of the
trial courts class certification. In November 2009, the Florida trial court granted Summary
Judgment in our favor against Plaintiff Enrique Galura, and his claim has been dismissed. Marisa
Hazeltons claim is still pending. We currently intend to continue our vigorous appeal and defense
of this lawsuit and to assert available defenses. However, an adverse resolution of this lawsuit
could result in the payment of significant costs and damages, which could have a material adverse
effect on our future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. At a mediation held
February 4, 2011, we reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle this class
action lawsuit, and a settlement agreement was signed by the parties on March 1, 2011. The
settlement agreement remains conditioned upon receiving final approval by the Florida state court.
In the event that a definitive settlement of this lawsuit is finalized upon terms and conditions
consistent with the settlement agreement, such a settlement would not have a material adverse
effect on our future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Several private civil actions have been filed against us and several of our dealership
subsidiaries that purport to represent classes of customers as potential plaintiffs and made
allegations that certain products sold in the finance and insurance departments were done so in a
deceptive or otherwise illegal manner. One of these private civil actions was filed on November 15,
2004 in South Carolina state court, York County Court of Common Pleas, against us and 10 of our
South Carolina subsidiaries. The plaintiffs in that lawsuit were Misty J. Owens, James B. Wright,
Vincent J. Astey and Joseph Lee Williams, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly
situated, with plaintiffs seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief on behalf of the purported
class. The group of plaintiffs attorneys representing the plaintiffs in the South Carolina lawsuit
also filed another private civil class action lawsuit against us and 3 of our subsidiaries on
February 14, 2005 in state court in North Carolina, Lincoln County Superior Court, which similarly
sought certification of a multi-state class of plaintiffs and alleged that certain products sold in
the finance and insurance departments were done so in a deceptive or otherwise illegal manner. The
plaintiffs in this North Carolina lawsuit were Robert Price, Carolyn Price, Marcus Cappeletti and
Kathy Cappeletti, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, with plaintiffs
seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief on behalf of the purported class. The South Carolina
state court action and the North Carolina state court action have since been consolidated into a
single proceeding in private arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. On November
12, 2008, claimants in the consolidated arbitration filed a Motion for Class Certification as a
national class action including all of the states in which we operate dealerships. Claimants are
seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief on behalf of this class of customers. The parties
have briefed and argued the issue of class certification.
On July 19, 2010, the Arbitrator issued a Partial Final Award on Class Certification,
certifying a class which includes all customers who, on or after November 15, 2000, purchased or
leased from one of our dealerships a vehicle with the Etch product as part of the transaction, but
not including customers who purchased or leased such vehicles from one of our dealerships in
Florida. The Partial Final Award on Class Certification is not a final decision on the merits of
the action. The merits of Claimants assertions and potential damages will still have to be proven
through the remainder of the arbitration. The Arbitrator stayed the Arbitration for thirty days to
allow either party to petition a court of competent jurisdiction to confirm or vacate the
award. We will seek review of the class certification ruling by a court of competent jurisdiction
and will continue to press our argument that this action is not suitable for a class-based
arbitration. On July 22, 2010, the plaintiffs in this consolidated arbitration filed a Motion to
Confirm the Arbitrators Partial Final Award on Class Certification in state court in North
Carolina, Lincoln County Superior Court. On August 17, 2010, we filed to remove this North Carolina
state court action to federal court, and simultaneously filed a Petition to Vacate the Arbitrators
Partial Final Award on Class Certification, with both filings made in the United Stated District
Court for the Western District of North Carolina. We intend to continue our vigorous defense of
this arbitration and to assert all available defenses. However, an adverse resolution of this
arbitration could result in the payment of significant costs and damages, which could have a
material adverse effect on our future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are involved, and expect to continue to be involved, in numerous legal and administrative
proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business, including regulatory investigations and
private civil actions brought by plaintiffs purporting to
30
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
represent a potential class or for which a class has been certified. Although we vigorously defend
ourself in all legal and administrative proceedings, the outcomes of pending and future proceedings
arising out of the conduct of our business, including litigation with customers, employment related
lawsuits, contractual disputes, class actions, purported class actions and actions brought by
governmental authorities, cannot be predicted with certainty. An unfavorable resolution of one or
more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations, cash flows or prospects.
31
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RISK FACTORS
RISK FACTORS
Item 1A: Risk Factors
In addition to the information below and other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you
should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business,
financial condition or future results.
Disruptions in the supply-chain of automotive manufacturers and related parts suppliers may
negatively impact our profitability.
As a retail company, we are dependent upon others to supply us with new vehicles for retail
sale and vehicle components for our parts and service operations. Significant disruptions in these
supply-chains may affect the availability of new vehicles and vehicle components which are
necessary to our operations.
As
a result of the March 2011 earthquake and associated tsunami
affecting Japan, certain automotive
manufacturing and automotive manufacturing support activities have been negatively affected. These
automotive manufacturing and automotive manufacturing support activities served a wide range of
companies globally. This includes the Japanese automotive manufacturers such as Toyota and Honda,
but also includes automotive manufactures and parts suppliers globally which source component parts
from the affected regions in Japan. Although it is difficult to quantify the effect of these events
or the duration of the supply-chain disruption, we believe the following may occur:
| Lower supply of new vehicle inventory beginning in the second quarter; |
||
| Higher cost of certain automotive parts while the supply-chain is disrupted; |
||
| Higher cost of certain new vehicle inventory (sourced either directly from manufacturers or
from other franchised dealers) while supply is lower; |
||
| Increased demand for certain used or certified vehicles which may increase the acquisition
cost of those vehicles either through trade or auction; and |
||
| The supply and manufacturing disruptions may also affect other major automotive
manufacturers in some manner due to the reliance on certain components that are sourced in
Japan. |
Our significant indebtedness could materially adversely affect our financial health, limit our
ability to finance future acquisitions and capital expenditures and prevent us from fulfilling our
financial obligations.
As of March 31, 2011, our total outstanding indebtedness was approximately $1.5 billion,
including the following:
| $848.6 million under the secured new and used inventory floor plan facilities; |
||
| $208.7 million in 9.0% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 (the 9.0% Notes),
representing $210.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding less unamortized
discount of approximately $1.3 million |
||
| $42.7 million in 8.625% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the 8.625% Notes),
representing $42.9 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding less unamortized net
discount of approximately $0.2 million; |
||
| $149.2 million in 5.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029 which are redeemable by us
and which may be put to us by the holders after October 1, 2014 under certain
circumstances (the 5.0% Convertible Notes), representing $172.5 million in aggregate
principal amount outstanding less unamortized discount of approximately $23.3 million; |
||
| $185.6 million of mortgage notes, representing $186.6 million in aggregate principal
amount less unamortized net discount of approximately $1.0 million, due from June 2013 to
December 2031, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.99%; and |
||
| $22.7 million of other secured debt, representing $21.0 million in aggregate
principal amount plus unamortized premium of approximately $1.7 million. |
32
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RISK FACTORS
RISK FACTORS
We have $150.0 million of maximum borrowing availability under a syndicated revolving credit
facility (the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility), up to $321.0 million in maximum borrowing
availability for new vehicle inventory floor plan financing and up to $50.0 million in maximum
borrowing availability for used vehicle inventory floor plan financing (the 2010 Floor Plan
Facilities). We refer to the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility and 2010 Floor Plan Facilities
collectively as our 2010 Credit Facilities. As of March 31, 2011, we had $100.2 million available
for additional borrowings under the 2010 Revolving Credit Facility based on the borrowing base
calculation, which is affected by numerous factors including eligible asset balances and the market
value of certain additional collateral. We are able to borrow under our 2010 Revolving Credit
Facility only if, at the time of the borrowing, we can make all representations and warranties and
are in compliance with all financial and other covenants contained therein. We also have capacity
to finance new and used vehicle inventory purchases under bilateral floor plan agreements with
various manufacturer-affiliated finance companies and other lending institutions (the Silo Floor
Plan Facilities) as well as our 2010 Floor Plan Facilities. In addition, the indentures relating
to our 9.0% Notes, 8.625% Notes, 5.0% Convertible Notes and our other debt instruments allow us to
incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, as long as we comply with the terms
thereunder.
In addition, the majority of our dealership properties are leased under long-term operating
lease arrangements that commonly have initial terms of fifteen to twenty years with renewal options
ranging from five to ten years. These operating leases require compliance with financial and
operating covenants similar to those under our 2010 Credit Facilities, and monthly payments of rent
that may fluctuate based on interest rates and local consumer price indices. The total future
minimum lease payments related to these operating leases and certain equipment leases are
significant and are disclosed in Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, in the notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010.
The outcome of legal and administrative proceedings we are or may become involved in could have a
material adverse effect on our future business, results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows.
We are involved, and expect to continue to be involved, in numerous legal and administrative
proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business, including regulatory investigations and
private civil actions brought by plaintiffs purporting to represent a potential class or for which
a class has been certified.
We are a defendant in the matter of Galura, et al. v. Sonic Automotive, Inc., a private civil
action filed in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida. In this action, originally filed
on December 30, 2002, the plaintiffs allege that we and our Florida dealerships sold an antitheft
protection product in a deceptive or otherwise illegal manner, and further sought representation on
behalf of any customer of any of our Florida dealerships who purchased the antitheft protection
product since December 30, 1998. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief
on behalf of this class of customers. In June 2005, the court granted the plaintiffs motion for
certification of the requested class of customers, but the court has made no finding to date
regarding actual liability in this lawsuit. We subsequently filed a notice of appeal of the courts
class certification ruling with the Florida Court of Appeals. In April 2007, the Florida Court of
Appeals affirmed a portion of the trial courts class certification, and overruled a portion of the
trial courts class certification. In November 2009, the Florida trial court granted Summary
Judgment in our favor against Plaintiff Enrique Galura, and his claim has been dismissed. Marisa
Hazeltons claim is still pending. We currently intend to continue our vigorous appeal and defense
of this lawsuit and to assert available defenses. However, an adverse resolution of this lawsuit
could result in the payment of significant costs and damages, which could have a material adverse
effect on our future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. At a mediation held
February 4, 2011, we reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle this class
action lawsuit, and a settlement agreement was signed by the parties on March 1, 2011. The
settlement agreement remains conditioned upon receiving final approval by the Florida state court.
In the event that a definitive settlement of this lawsuit is finalized upon terms and conditions
consistent with the settlement agreement, such a settlement would not have a material adverse
effect on our future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Several private civil actions have been filed against us and several of our dealership
subsidiaries that purport to represent classes of customers as potential plaintiffs and made
allegations that certain products sold in the finance and insurance departments were done so in a
deceptive or otherwise illegal manner. One of these private civil actions was filed on November 15,
2004 in South Carolina state court, York County Court of Common Pleas, against us and 10 of our
South Carolina subsidiaries. The plaintiffs in that lawsuit were Misty J. Owens, James B. Wright,
Vincent J. Astey and Joseph Lee Williams, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly
situated, with plaintiffs seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief on behalf of the purported
class. The group of plaintiffs attorneys representing the plaintiffs in the South Carolina lawsuit
also filed another private civil class action lawsuit against us and 3 of our subsidiaries on
February 14, 2005 in state court in North Carolina, Lincoln County Superior Court, which similarly
sought certification of a multi-state class of plaintiffs and alleged that certain products sold in
the finance and insurance departments were done so in a deceptive or
33
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RISK FACTORS
RISK FACTORS
otherwise illegal manner. The plaintiffs in this North Carolina lawsuit were Robert Price, Carolyn
Price, Marcus Cappeletti and Kathy Cappeletti, on behalf of themselves and all other persons
similarly situated, with plaintiffs seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief on behalf of the
purported class. The South Carolina state court action and the North Carolina state court action
have since been consolidated into a single proceeding in private arbitration before the American
Arbitration Association. On November 12, 2008, claimants in the consolidated arbitration filed a
Motion for Class Certification as a national class action including all of the states in which we
operate dealerships. Claimants are seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief on behalf of this
class of customers. The parties have briefed and argued the issue of class certification.
On July 19, 2010, the Arbitrator issued a Partial Final Award on Class Certification,
certifying a class which includes all customers who, on or after November 15, 2000, purchased or
leased from one of our dealerships a vehicle with the Etch product as part of the transaction, but
not including customers who purchased or leased such vehicles from one of our dealerships in
Florida. The Partial Final Award on Class Certification is not a final decision on the merits of
the action. The merits of Claimants assertions and potential damages will still have to be proven
through the remainder of the arbitration. The Arbitrator stayed the Arbitration for thirty days to
allow either party to petition a court of competent jurisdiction to confirm or vacate the award. We
will seek review of the class certification ruling by a court of competent jurisdiction and will
continue to press our argument that this action is not suitable for a class-based arbitration. On
July 22, 2010, the plaintiffs in this consolidated arbitration filed a Motion to Confirm the
Arbitrators Partial Final Award on Class Certification in state court in North Carolina, Lincoln
County Superior Court. On August 17, 2010, we filed to remove this North Carolina state court
action to federal court, and simultaneously filed a Petition to Vacate the Arbitrators Partial
Final Award on Class Certification, with both filings made in the United Stated District Court for
the Western District of North Carolina. We intend to continue our vigorous defense of this
arbitration and to assert all available defenses. However, an adverse resolution of this
arbitration could result in the payment of significant costs and damages, which could have a
material adverse effect on our future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Although we vigorously defend ourself in all legal and administrative proceedings, the
outcomes of pending and future proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business, including
litigation with customers, employment related lawsuits, contractual disputes, class actions,
purported class actions and actions brought by governmental authorities, cannot be predicted with
certainty. An unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects.
34
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased as | Value of Shares That | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average | Part of Publicly | May Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | Price Paid | Announced Plans or | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
(1) | per Share | Programs (2) | Programs | |||||||||||||
January 2011 |
| $ | | | $ | 43,511 | ||||||||||
February 2011 |
3 | 14.38 | 3 | 43,475 | ||||||||||||
March 2011 |
289 | 13.36 | 289 | 39,608 | ||||||||||||
Total |
292 | $ | 13.37 | 292 | $ | 39,608 |
(1) All shares repurchased were part of publicly announced share repurchase programs
(2) Our publicly announced Class A Common Stock repurchase authorizations occurred as follows:
(amounts in thousands) | ||||
November 1999 |
$ | 25,000 | ||
February 2000 |
25,000 | |||
December 2000 |
25,000 | |||
May 2001 |
25,000 | |||
August 2002 |
25,000 | |||
February 2003 |
20,000 | |||
December 2003 |
20,000 | |||
July 2004 |
20,000 | |||
July 2007 |
30,000 | |||
October 2007 |
40,000 | |||
April 2008 |
40,000 | |||
Total |
$ | 295,000 |
35
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 6: Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits:
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
31.1
|
Certification of Mr. David P. Cosper pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) | |
31.2
|
Certification of Mr. O. Bruton Smith pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) | |
32.1
|
Certification of Mr. David P. Cosper pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2
|
Certification of Mr. O. Bruton Smith pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
36
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains numerous forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
address our future objectives, plans and goals, as well as our intent, beliefs and current
expectations regarding future operating performance, and can generally be identified by words such
as may, will, should, believe, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, foresee and
other similar words or phrases. Specific events addressed by these forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to:
| the effect of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan on our operations; |
||
| vehicle sales rates and same store sales growth; |
||
| future liquidity trends or needs; |
||
| our business and growth strategies; |
||
| future covenant compliance; |
||
| our financing plans and our ability to repay or refinance existing debt when due; |
||
| future acquisitions or dispositions; |
||
| level of fuel prices; |
||
| industry trends; and |
||
| general economic trends, including employment rates and consumer confidence levels. |
These forward-looking statements are based on our current estimates and assumptions and
involve various risks and uncertainties. As a result, you are cautioned that these forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and that actual results could differ materially
from those projected in these forward-looking statements. Factors which may cause actual results to
differ materially from our projections include those risks described in Item 1 and Item 1A of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Item 1A of this Form 10-Q and
elsewhere in this report, as well as:
| the number of new and used cars sold in the United States generally and as compared
to our expectations and the expectations of the market; |
||
| our ability to generate sufficient cash flows or obtain additional financing to fund
acquisitions, capital expenditures, our share repurchase program, dividends on our Common
Stock and general operating activities; |
||
| the reputation and financial condition of vehicle manufacturers whose brands we
represent, the financial incentives vehicle manufacturers offer and their ability to
design, manufacture, deliver and market their vehicles successfully; |
||
| our relationships with manufacturers, which may affect our ability to complete
additional acquisitions; |
||
| adverse resolutions of one or more significant legal proceedings against us or our
dealerships; |
||
| changes in laws and regulations governing the operation of automobile franchises,
accounting standards, taxation requirements and environmental laws; |
||
| general economic conditions in the markets in which we operate, including
fluctuations in interest rates, employment levels, the level of consumer spending and
consumer credit availability; |
||
| the terms of any refinancing of our existing indebtedness; |
||
| high competition in the automotive retailing industry, which not only creates pricing
pressures on the products and services we offer, but on businesses we seek to acquire; |
||
| our ability to successfully integrate potential future acquisitions; and |
||
| the rate and timing of overall economic recovery or decline. |
37
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. | ||||
Date: April 28, 2011
|
By: | /s/ O. BRUTON SMITH | ||
O. Bruton Smith | ||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: April 28, 2011
|
By: | /s/ DAVID P. COSPER | ||
David P. Cosper | ||||
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
38
Table of Contents
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
31.1
|
Certification of Mr. David P. Cosper pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) | |
31.2
|
Certification of Mr. O. Bruton Smith pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) | |
32.1
|
Certification of Mr. David P. Cosper pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2
|
Certification of Mr. O. Bruton Smith pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
39