Annual Statements Open main menu

STORE CAPITAL LLC - Annual Report: 2014 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

 

 

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

or

 

 

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                      to                     .  

Commission File No. 001-36739  

 

STORE CAPITAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

 

Maryland

 

45-2280254

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

8501 East Princess Drive, Suite 190, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (480) 256-1100

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

 

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

 

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes      No   

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes      No   

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes      No   

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes      No   

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

 

 

 

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

 

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer

  

Smaller reporting company

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes      No   

 

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of a share of the registrant’s common stock on November 18, 2014 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on such date, was approximately $616,687,500.  The registrant has elected to use November 18, 2014, which was the initial trading date on the New York Stock Exchange, as the calculation date because on June 30, 2014 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the registrant was a privately held company.  Shares of the registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer, director and beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from the calculation, as such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.  This determination of affiliate status should not be deemed conclusive for any other purpose.  As of March 6, 2015, there were 115,210,809 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference

 

Portions of Part III of this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year.

 

 


 

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

    

 

    

Page
Number

PART I 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1. 

 

Business

 

1

Item 1A. 

 

Risk Factors

 

11

Item 1B. 

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

27

Item 2. 

 

Properties

 

27

Item 3. 

 

Legal Proceedings

 

31

Item 4. 

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

PART II 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5. 

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters  and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

32

Item 6. 

 

Selected Financial Data

 

34

Item 7. 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

35

Item 7A. 

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

50

Item 8. 

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

51

Item 9. 

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

76

Item 9A. 

 

Controls and Procedures

 

76

Item 9B. 

 

Other Information

 

76

 

 

 

 

 

PART III 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10. 

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

77

Item 11. 

 

Executive Compensation

 

77

Item 12. 

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

77

Item 13. 

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

77

Item 14. 

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

78

 

 

 

 

 

PART IV 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 15. 

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

79

 

 

 


 

Table of Contents

PART I

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”), we refer to STORE Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation, as “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” or “S|T|O|R|E, unless we specifically state otherwise or the context indicates otherwise.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements concerning our business and growth strategies, investment, financing and leasing activities and trends in our business, including trends in the market for long-term, triple-net leases of freestanding, single-tenant properties.   Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “likely,” “will,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.  Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such statements included in this Annual Report may not prove to be accurate.  In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.  For a further discussion of these and other factors that could impact future results, performance or transactions, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Forward-looking statements and such risks, uncertainties and other factors speak only as of the date of this Annual Report, and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained herein, to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto, or any other change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based, except to the extent otherwise required by law.

Item 1.  BUSINESS

General

S|T|O|R|E is an internally managed net‑lease real estate investment trust, or REIT, that is the leader in the acquisition, investment and management of Single Tenant Operational Real Estate, or STORE Properties, which is our target market and the inspiration for our name. A STORE Property is a real property location at which a company operates its business and generates sales and profits, which makes the location a profit center and, therefore, fundamentally important to that business.

S|T|O|R|E continues the investment activities of our senior leadership team, which has been investing in single‑tenant operational real estate for over thirty-five years.   We are one of the largest and fastest‑growing net‑lease REITs, as demonstrated by the table below, and own a large, well‑diversified portfolio that consists of investments in 947 property locations operated by 226 customers across 46 states as of December 31, 2014.  Our customers operate across a wide variety of industries within the service, retail and industrial sectors of the U.S. economy, with restaurants, early childhood education centers, health clubs, movie theaters and sporting goods stores representing the top industries in our portfolio.


 

Table of Contents

Our Total Investment Portfolio at Quarter End

 

Picture 3

 

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which we refer to in this Annual Report as the “Code,” commencing with our initial taxable year ended December 31, 2011. To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain tests which, among other things, generally require that our assets consist primarily of real estate assets, our income be derived primarily from real estate assets, and that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (other than our net capital gains) to our stockholders annually. 

Although we are a public company, we are a “controlled company” (within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE) because a substantial portion of our common stock (approximately 71%) is owned indirectly by certain investment funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. Oaktree is a global investment management firm specializing in alternative investments with approximately $91 billion in assets under management as of December 31, 2014.

2014 Highlights

·

On November 21, 2014, we completed our initial public offering, or IPO, of 31,625,000 shares of our common stock, including 4,125,000 shares of common stock sold in connection with the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, at a price to the public of $18.50 per share.  The shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 18, 2014 under the ticker symbol “STOR”.  Net proceeds from the sale of our common stock were approximately $545.8 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, the majority of which has been used as of December 31, 2014 to pay down outstanding credit facility debt and for portfolio acquisitions.

·

In September 2014, we entered into a new three-year $300 million unsecured revolving credit facility, which replaced our two existing secured credit facilities that aggregated $300 million. This new facility includes an accordion feature that allows the size of the facility to be increased up to $500 million and provides us more flexibility at a lower cost than our previous facilities

·

In May 2014, we issued our fifth series of STORE Master Funding net-lease mortgage notes payable, aggregating $260 million in principal amount. In addition, we added $53 million of traditional mortgage debt in 2014, bringing our total long-term outstanding debt to $1.28 billion at December 31, 2014, up from $992 million at December 31, 2013. Of our total gross investment in real estate of $2.8 billion at year-end,

2


 

approximately $1.85 billion is utilized as collateral for our $1.28 billion of secured debt outstanding, leaving $952 million of real estate assets unencumbered as of December 31, 2014. 

·

For the year ended December 31, 2014, we declared dividends of $0.9898 per common share to our stockholders, which includes a pro-rated dividend per common share of $0.1139, or $1.00 per share on an annualized basis, for the period since the closing of the IPO through December 31, 2014. 

·

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we invested over  $1.1 billion in 341 property locations.

Our Target Market

We are the leader in providing real estate financing solutions principally to middle‑market and larger businesses that own STORE Properties and operate within the broad-based service, retail and industrial sectors of the U.S. economy.  Our net‑lease solutions are designed to provide a long‑term, lower‑cost way to improve our customers capital structures and, thus, be a preferred alternative to real estate ownership.    We estimate the market for STORE Properties to exceed $2.3 trillion in market value and to include more than 1.5 million properties.

We define middle‑market companies as those having approximate annual gross revenues of between $20 million and $300 million, although some of our customers have annual revenues substantially in excess of $300 million.  Most of our customers do not have credit ratings, while some have ratings from rating agencies that service insurance companies or fixed‑income investors.  Most of these non-rated companies either prefer to be unrated or are simply too small to issue debt rated by a nationally recognized rating agency in a cost‑efficient manner.

Despite the markets size, the financing marketplace for STORE Properties is highly fragmented, with few participants addressing the long‑term capital needs of middle‑market and larger non-rated companies.  While we believe our net‑lease financing solutions can add value to a wide variety of companies, we believe the largest underserved market and, therefore, our greatest opportunity is non-rated, bank‑dependent, middle‑market and larger companies that generally have less access to efficient sources of long‑term capital.

We believe the demand for our net‑lease solutions is even greater today as a result of the current bank regulatory environment.  In our view, the increased scrutiny and regulation of the banking industry over the past several years in response to the collapse of the housing and mortgage industries from 2007 to 2009, particularly with the passage of the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Basel Accords issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, have made commercial banks even less responsive to the long‑term capital needs of the middle‑market companies we target.   These companies have historically depended on commercial banks for their financing.    

S|T|O|R|E was formed to capitalize on this market opportunity and address the capital needs of middle‑market and larger non-rated companies by offering them a superior alternative to financing their profit‑center real estate with traditional mortgage or bank debt and their own equity.  We believe our opportunities include both gaining market share from the fragmented network of net‑lease capital providers and growing the market by creating demand for our net‑lease solutions that meet the long‑term real estate capital needs of these companies.

Our target market of STORE Properties is divided into three primary sectors and various sub-sectors.  The primary sectors and their proportion of our target market are service at 47%, retail at 37% and industrial at 16%.  The sub-sectors included within each primary sector are summarized in the table below.

Service

    

Retail

    

Industrial

Restaurants

 

Big box retail

 

Industrial profit-centers

Education

 

Specialty retail

 

 

Fitness centers

 

Grocery

 

 

Transportation

 

Drug stores

 

 

Automotive services

 

Automotive (new and used)

 

 

Family entertainment

 

 

 

 

 

3


 

Table of Contents

Within the sub‑sectors, the market for STORE Properties is further subdivided into a wide variety of industries within the service, retail and industrial sectors, such as:

Automotive parts stores

    

Movie theaters

Cold storage facilities

 

Office supplies retailers

Department stores

 

Pet care facilities

Discount stores

 

Rental centers

Early childhood education

 

Secondary education

Furniture stores

 

Supermarkets

Entertainment facilities

 

Truck stops

Fast food restaurants

 

Wholesale clubs

Full service restaurants

 

 

 

Many of these industries are represented within our diverse property portfolio.

Our Asset Class:  STORE Properties

Single Tenant Operational Real Estate, or STORE Properties, is a unique asset class that inspired the formation of S|T|O|R|E and our company name.  STORE Properties are profit-center real estate locations on which our tenants conduct their businesses and generate their revenues and profits.  The defining characteristic of STORE Properties is the number of payment sources:  STORE Properties have three payment sources, whereas all other commercial real estate assets have just two.

·

Unit-Level ProfitabilitySTORE Properties are distinguished by the primary source of their rent payment, which comes directly from the profits produced by the business operations at the real estate locations we own, which we refer to as ‘unit-level profitability.  While it is a common perception that the tenant is the primary source of the rent payment (as distinguished from the business at the unit itself),  the historic pattern we have observed of tenants in corporate insolvencies vacating unprofitable locations and retaining profitable ones is the main indicator of the payment source.  Because tenants historically retain profitable locations and vacate unprofitable ones in the event of insolvency, it is fundamentally important for S|T|O|R|E to collect and review the unit-level financial statements of our tenants at our real estate locations, which is a key component of our business model.  As of December 31, 2014, we receive unit-level financial statements on over 96% of the properties in our portfolioWithout having access to unit-level financial reporting for the business activities conducted on the properties we own, we would not have an accurate assessment of the essential nature of our real estate to our customer’s business; without this, we would be speculating about the quality of the most important, and primary, payment source.

·

Tenant Credit QualityIn addition to the unit-level profitability of the business on the real estate we own, there are two other payment sources that are common to all real estate investments.  One is tenant credit quality, which serves as an additional, but not primary, source of payment to unit-level profitability.  The tenant’s credit can become the primary payment source if our unit is not profitable and the tenant is required to divert cash flows from its other units or other resources to pay our rents.  However, tenant credit quality tends to be subject to greater volatility over time than unit-level profitability, because tenant credit quality is not only a function of the unit-level profitability of the operations at our locations, but of the profitability of potentially many other existing and new assets owned and operated by our tenant.  Corporate financial health is also a function of many other decisions, such as capital structure or growth strategies, as well as conditions in the marketplace for the tenant’s products and services, which can change over time and which may have profound impacts on tenant creditworthiness. 

·

Real Estate Residual Value.  The other payment source that is common to all real estate investments (and is the third of our three payment sources) is the residual value of the underlying real estate, which gives us the opportunity to receive rents from other substitute tenants in the event our asset becomes vacant.  For S|T|O|R|E, this means more than just looking at broad lease rate and transaction comparables.  Studies we have done underscore the importance of investing in properties at or below their as-new replacement costs.  We also review the local markets in which our properties are located and seek to have rents that are at or

4


 

below prevailing market rents on a per square foot basis for comparable properties.  Taking these steps protects S|T|O|R|E and our customers by making it easier for us to assign, sell or sublease properties that our customers may want to sell, reposition or vacate as part of their capital efficiency strategy. 

The following diagram illustrates the three sources of payment that are common among STORE Properties:

Picture 1

The S|T|O|R|E Credit Pyramid

 

The investment, management and capitalization competencies we have developed over more than thirty-five years, like our credit pyramid, arise from the distinctive characteristics of the large asset class of STORE Properties we address.

Our Competitive Strengths

Our objective is to build upon our market‑leading platform for the acquisition, investment and management of STORE Properties that simultaneously creates value for stockholders and customers through our five corporate competencies.  Each member of our senior leadership team is primarily responsible for one of our five competencies, which are described below:

·

Investment OriginationS|T|O|R|E Capital was formed to fill a need for efficient long-term real estate capital for middle-market and larger customers. We do this principally by creating lease contracts that address our customers’ needs and create strong alignments of interest that benefit our stockholders. By creating demand for our services, and not simply taking market share or aggregating assets, we have maintained a  large pipeline of investment opportunities ever since we commenced operations in 2011.  As a result, approximately 75% of our investments (by dollar volume) have been originated by our internal origination team through direct customer relationships using our form financing documents. Our objective is to be both selective and achieve higher rates of return than our stockholders could achieve if they sought to acquire profit-center real estate on their own.  At the same time, our solutions-oriented approach strives to create superior value for our customers over other financing options they may have to capitalize their businesses.

·

Investment Underwriting.  Our methods of risk evaluation have been developed by our senior leadership team over thirty-five years, more than $12 billion and over 8,000 STORE Property investments.  Our investment underwriting approach centers on evaluations of unit-level and corporate-level financial performance, together with detailed real estate valuation assessments.  These three areas represent our credit pyramid, which is reflective of the characteristics of the STORE Property asset class.  At S|T|O|R|E,  

5


 

we have combined our underwriting approach with our portfolio management systems to capture tenant credit ratings and lease contract ratings (referred to as a S|T|O|R|E Score) as tools to monitor ongoing portfolio performance. Our collective experience has enabled us to develop sophisticated risk evaluation tools and insights that are designed to offer greater risk-adjusted investment results than those available to most real estate investors. 

The following table compares our tenant credit ratings (determined using Moody’s Riskcalc) with the STORE Score:

Picture 5

 

·

Investment Documentation.  For over thirty-five years, we have learned that lease contracts, and not tenant credit quality, are the principal determinants of investment risk. Part of contract creation is embodied in the investment underwriting process, which focuses on the following factors: the prices we pay for the real estate; the unit-level profitability of the businesses operated on our real estate; the rents and escalations we receive; and the support offered to the investment by tenant credit quality.  These factors are ultimately incorporated into our contracts and supported by third party diligence, including appraisals, property condition reports, environmental reports and other diligence. Finally, the contracts we create foster alignments of interest through the use of features such as master leases and bankruptcy-remote investment structures. Altogether, our documentation process, like our approach to underwriting, has evolved over decades and offers investors in S|T|O|R|E a value that most could not create for themselves.

·

Portfolio Management.  Net-lease real estate investment portfolios require active management in order to realize superior risk-adjusted rates of return.  With a diversified portfolio, we have developed highly effective approaches that place greater focus on the minority of investments that have a higher risk potential to experience future problems.  For over thirty-five years, we have learned how to monitor unit-level profit and loss statements, tenant corporate financial statements and the timely payment of property taxes and insurance in order to gauge portfolio quality.  S|T|O|R|E represents our third, and most highly developed, servicing platform. We are virtually paperless, have access to granular or highly detailed information on our portfolio from virtually anywhere and are highly scalable.  Having such systems helps us effectively monitor and reduce tenant credit risk at the property level.  And when combined with our high degree of financial and operating flexibility, we are able to realize better stockholder risk-adjusted rates of return on our invested capital.

·

Financial Reporting and TreasuryWe consider and evaluate our corporate financing strategies with the same emphasis as our real estate investment strategies.   Borrowings must prudently improve stockholder returns; they must be structured to provide portfolio flexibility and minimize our exposure to changes in long-term interest rates; they must be structured to optimize our cost of financing that will enhance investor

6


 

rates of return; and finally, a liability strategy should contribute to corporate governance by enhancing corporate flexibility.  Our senior leadership team has extensive experience with diverse liability strategies. Today, we are one of the few REITs to employ our own A+ rated borrowing source.   Our senior leadership team developed our master funding conduit strategy in 2005, which is ideally suited to finance diverse portfolios of profit-center real estate, such as ours. The strategies we implement are designed to add value to our investors by offering a more efficient means to finance real estate than they could otherwise do on their own.  At the same time, the flexibility we derive from our liability strategies can also result in important flexibility for our customers.

Our Business and Growth Strategies

Our objective is to continue to create stockholder value through sustained investment and management activities designed to grow distributable cash flows and deliver attractive risk-adjusted rates of return from a growing, diverse portfolio of STORE Properties. To accomplish this, our principal business and growth strategies are as follows:

·

Continue to Focus on Middle‑Market Companies Operating STORE Properties.  We believe we have selected the most attractive investment opportunity within the net‑lease market, STORE Properties, and targeted the most attractive customer type within that market, middle‑market and larger non-rated companies.  We focus on this market given its strong fundamentals and outsized growth potential.  Within the net‑lease market for STORE Properties, our value proposition is most compelling to middle‑market, bank‑dependent companies who are not rated by any nationally recognized rating agency due to their size or capital markets preferences, but who have strong credit metrics and operate within broad-based industries having the potential for sustained relevance.   

·

Realize Stable Income and Internal Growth.  We seek to make investments that generate strong and stable current income as a result of the difference, or spread, between the rate we earn on our assets and the rate we pay on our liabilities (primarily our long‑term debt).  We augment that income with internal growth.  We seek to realize superior internal growth through a combination of (1) a target dividend payout ratio that permits a level of free cash flow reinvestment and (2) cash generated from the 1.7% weighted average annual escalation of base rent and interest in our portfolio (as of December 31, 2014).  We benefit from contractual rent escalations, as nearly 97% of our leases and loans (by annualized base rent and interest) have escalations that are either fixed (23%) or based on the Consumer Price Index, or CPI (74%).    We believe this will enable strong dividend growth without relying exclusively on future common stock issuances to fund new portfolio investments. 

·

Capitalize on Direct Origination Capabilities for External Growth.  As the market leader in STORE Property investment originations, we plan to complement our internal growth with continued new investments that are funded through future equity issuances and borrowings to expand our platform and raise investor cash flows.    

·

Actively Manage our Balance Sheet to Maximize Capital Efficiency.  We seek to select funding sources designed to lock in long‑term investment spreads and limit interest rate sensitivity.  We also seek to maintain a prudent balance between the use of debt (which includes our own STORE Master Funding program,  commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, borrowings, insurance borrowings, bank borrowings and possibly preferred stock issuances) and equity financing.  As of December 31, 2014, the long‑term, non‑recourse debt of our consolidated special purpose entities had an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $1.3 billion, a weighted average maturity of 6.9 years and a weighted average interest rate of 4.9%.  On an annualized basis, our fourth quarter adjusted debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, was under 6x and, as we move forward as a public company, we are targeting a ratio of between 6x and 7x.

·

Increase our portfolio diversity.  As of December 31, 2014, we had invested $2.8 billion in 947 property locations, substantially all of which are profit centers for our customers.  Our portfolio is highly diversified with 226 customers operating 208 different brand names, or business concepts, across 46 states and over 65 industry groups.  None of our customers represented more than 4% of our portfolio as of 

7


 

December 31, 2014, based on annualized base rent and interest.  Our portfolios diversity decreases the impact on us of an adverse event affecting a specific customer, industry or region, thereby increasing the stability of our cash flows.  Additional acquisitions in the future will further increase the diversity of our portfolio and, from time to time, we may sell properties in our portfolio to improve overall portfolio credit quality or diversity.

Competition

We face competition in the acquisition and financing of STORE Properties from numerous investors, including traded and non‑traded public REITs, private equity investors and institutional investment funds, some of which have greater financial resources than we do, a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire properties and the ability to accept more risk.  We also believe that competition for real estate financing comes from middle‑market business owners themselves, many of whom have had a historic preference to own, rather than lease, the real estate they use in their businesses.  The competition we face may increase the demand for STORE Properties and, therefore, reduce the number of suitable acquisition opportunities available to us or increase the price we must pay to acquire STORE Properties.  This competition will increase if investments in real estate become more attractive relative to other forms of investment.

Employees

As of December 31, 2014, we had 50 full‑time employees, all of whom are located in our single office in Scottsdale, Arizona. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.  We consider our employee relations to be good.

Principal Executive Offices

Our principal offices are located at 8501 East Princess Drive, Suite 190, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255.  We currently occupy approximately 14,000 square feet of space leased from an unaffiliated third party.  We believe that our offices are adequate for our present and currently planned future operations and that adequate additional space will be available if needed in the future.

Insurance

Our leases and loan agreements typically require our tenants and borrowers to maintain insurance of the types and in the amounts that are usual and customary for similar commercial properties, including commercial general liability, fire and extended loss insurance provided by reputable companies, with commercially reasonable exclusions, deductibles and limits, all as verified by our independent insurance consultant.  

Separately, we purchase contingent liability insurance, in excess of our tenants’ and borrowers’ liability coverage, to provide us with additional security in the event of a catastrophic claim. Also, we purchase property coverage, on a case-by-case basis, where we believe such additional insurance is warranted.

Regulation

Our properties are subject to various laws and regulations, including regulations relating to fire and safety requirements, ordinances and affirmative and negative covenants and in some instances, common area obligations.  Our tenants and borrowers have primary responsibilities for compliance with these requirements pursuant to our lease and loan agreements.  We believe that each of our tenants and borrowers have the necessary permits and approvals to operate and conduct their businesses on our properties.

Environmental Matters

General.  All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to human health and the environment. Certain of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on certain statutory classes of persons, including owners or operators, for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal.  

8


 

Table of Contents

These laws and regulations apply to past and present business operations of our tenants and borrowers and the use, storage, handling and contracting for recycling or disposal of hazardous substances or wastes.  Our tenants and borrowers are obligated to comply with environmental laws.  Our leases and loans typically impose obligations on our tenants and borrowers to indemnify us from all or most compliance costs we may experience as a result of the environmental conditions on our properties.  If a tenant or borrower fails to, or cannot, comply we may be required to pay such costs.  We are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of our properties which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.  We cannot predict whether new or more stringent laws relating to the environment will be enacted in the future or how such laws will impact the operations of businesses at our properties. Costs associated with an environmental event could be substantial.

Superlien Laws.  Under the laws of many states, contamination on a site may give rise to a lien on the site for clean‑up costs. In several states, such a lien has priority over all existing liens, including those of existing mortgages. In these states, the lien of a mortgage may lose its priority to such a superlien.

CERCLA.  The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or CERCLA, imposes strict liability on present and past owners and operators of a contaminated site for the costs of clean‑up.  A secured lender may be liable as an owner or operator of a contaminated site if agents or employees of the lender have participated in the management of such site or in the operations of the tenant.  Excluded from CERCLAs definition of owner or operator however, is a person who without participating in the management of the facility, holds indicia of ownership primarily to protect his security interest.   This is the so called secured creditor exemption.  With respect to most of the assets in our investment portfolio, we are the owner of the real property.  However, with respect to a few of the assets in our investment portfolio, we are not the owner of the property but have a mortgage loan on the property.  In both instances, we believe we meet the secured creditor exemption.

Liability is not limited to the original or unamortized principal balance of a loan or to the value of the site securing a loan.  CERCLA provides substantial protection to lenders by defining the activities in which a lender can engage and still have the benefit of the secured creditor exemption. In order for a lender to be deemed to have participated in the management of a site, the lender must actually participate in the operational affairs of the site or our tenant or borrower. CERCLA provides that merely having the capacity to influence, or unexercised right to control operations does not constitute participation in management.  A lender may lose the protection of the secured creditor exemption only if it exercises decision‑making control over our tenants or borrowers environmental compliance and hazardous substance handling and disposal practices, or assumes responsibility for substantially all operational functions at the site or overall management encompassing day‑to‑day decision making with regard to environmental compliance.  CERCLA also provides that a lender will continue to have the benefit of the secured creditor exemption even if it forecloses on a site, purchases it at a foreclosure sale or accepts a deed‑in‑lieu of foreclosure provided that the lender seeks to sell the site at the earliest practicable commercially reasonable time on commercially reasonable terms.

Certain Other Federal and State Laws.  Many states have statutes similar to CERCLA, and not all of those statutes provide for a secured creditor exemption.  In addition, under federal law, there is potential liability relating to hazardous wastes and underground storage tanks under the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA.  The definition of hazardous substances under CERCLA specifically excludes petroleum products.  Subtitle I of RCRA governs underground petroleum storage tanks.  The protections accorded to lenders under CERCLA are also accorded to the holders of security interests in underground petroleum storage tanks if the lender does not participate in management of the underground storage tanks and is not otherwise engaged in petroleum production, refining or marketing.  It should be noted, however, that liability for cleanup of petroleum contamination may be governed by state law, which may not provide for any specific protection for secured creditors.

In a few states, transfers of some types of sites are conditioned upon cleanup of contamination prior to transfer. In these cases, a lender that becomes the owner of a site through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, may be required to clean up the contamination before selling or otherwise transferring the site.

Also, certain federal, state and local laws govern the removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos‑containing materials, or ACMs, in the event of the remodeling, renovation or demolition of a building. Such

9


 

Table of Contents

laws, as well as common law standards, may impose liability for releases of ACMs and may provide for third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of sites for personal injuries associated with such releases.

Beyond statute‑based environmental liability, there exist common law causes of action (for example, actions based on nuisance or on toxic tort resulting in death, personal injury or damage to site) related to hazardous environmental conditions on a site.  While it may be more difficult to hold a lender liable in such cases, unanticipated or uninsured liabilities of our tenant or borrower may jeopardize the tenants or borrowers ability to meet its lease or loan obligations.

Additional Considerations.  The cost of remediating hazardous substance contamination at a site can be substantial. If a lender becomes liable, it can bring an action for contribution against the owner or operator who created the environmental hazard, but that individual or entity may be without substantial assets.

If a lender forecloses on a mortgage secured by a site on which business operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations, the lender will be required to operate the site in accordance with those laws and regulations.  Such compliance may result in substantial expense.

In addition, a lender may be obligated to disclose environmental conditions on a site to government entities and/or to prospective buyers (including prospective buyers at a foreclosure sale or following foreclosure).  Such disclosure may decrease the amount that prospective buyers are willing to pay for the affected site, sometimes substantially, and thereby decrease the ability of the lender to recoup its investment in a loan upon foreclosure.

Emerging Growth Company Status

We currently qualify as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies,” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We plan to take advantage of these exemptions for our 2015 proxy statement.

In addition, an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. However, we are choosing to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for all public companies which are not emerging growth companies. Our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

We could remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years after our IPO, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of shares of our common stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

Available Information

We electronically file with the Securities and Exchange Commission our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  You may obtain a free copy of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports on the day of filing with the SEC on our website at www.storecapital.com, or by sending an email message to info@storecapital.com.  

10


 

Table of Contents

Item 1A.  RISK FACTORS

There are many factors that affect our business and the results of our operation, some of which are beyond our control.  The following is a description of important factors that may cause our actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently expected or discussed in forward-looking statements set forth in this Annual ReportForward-looking statements and such risks, uncertainties and other factors speak only as of the date of this Annual Report, and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained herein, to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto, or any other change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based, except to the extent otherwise required by law.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our business depends on our customers successfully operating their businesses on real estate we own or finance for them, and their failure to do so could materially and adversely affect our business.    Substantially all of our properties are leased by customers operating a business at those locations where sales and profits are generated for their businesses.  We underwrite and evaluate investment risk based on our belief that the most important, and primary, source of payment for our leases and loans is unit‑level profitability.  While a tenant may have other sources of payment to meet its obligations, we believe the success of our investments materially depends upon whether our customers successfully operate their businesses, and thus generate unit‑level profitability, at the location or locations we are acquiring or financing.  Our customers may be adversely affected by many factors beyond our control that might render one or more of their locations uneconomic.  These factors include poor management, changing demographics, a downturn in general economic conditions or changes in consumer trends that decrease demand for our customers products or services.  The occurrence of any of these may cause our customers to fail to pay rent when due, fail to pay real estate taxes when due, fail to pay insurance premiums when due, become insolvent or declare bankruptcy, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business.

Our investments are and are expected to continue to be concentrated in the single‑tenant, middle‑market sector, and if the demand of single‑tenant, middle‑market companies for net‑lease financing fails to increase or decreases, or if the supply of net‑lease financing increases in this sector, we could be materially and adversely affected.    Our target market is middle‑market companies that operate their businesses out of one or more locations that generate unit‑level profitability for the business.  Historically, many companies prefer to own, rather than lease, the real estate they use in their businesses.  A failure to increase demand for our products by, among other ways, failing to convince middle‑market companies to sell and lease back their STORE Properties, or a decrease in the demand of middle‑market companies to rent STORE Properties or an increase in the availability of STORE Properties for rent could materially and adversely affect us.

If we do not have sufficient access to debt and equity, we will be unable to continue to grow by acquiring STORE Properties.    As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends‑paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, each year to our stockholders.  As a result, our ability to retain earnings to fund acquisitions or make any capital expenditures, if required, will be limited.  Our long‑term ability to grow through additional investments will be limited if we cannot obtain additional debt or equity financing.  We cannot guarantee that debt or equity financing will be available to us in the future, or that we will be able to obtain it on favorable terms.

We depend on the asset‑backed securities market and the commercial mortgage‑backed securities market for our long‑term debt financing.  We depend on, and we likely will continue to depend on, the asset‑backed securities, or ABS, and the CMBS markets for our long‑term debt financing.  Substantially all of the long‑term debt on our balance sheet has been obtained from debt offerings in the ABS and CMBS markets. The ABS debt is issued by bankruptcy remote, special purpose entities that we or our subsidiaries own.  These special purpose entities issue multiple series of investment‑grade ABS notes from time to time as additional collateral is added to the collateral pool.  Our CMBS debt is generally in the form of first mortgage debt incurred by other special purpose entities that we or our subsidiaries own.  Our ABS and CMBS debt is generally non‑recourse.  However, there are customary limited exceptions to recourse for matters such as fraud, misrepresentation, gross negligence or willful misconduct, misapplication of payments, bankruptcy and environmental liabilities.

11


 

Table of Contents

In the event of a disruption in the financial markets for ABS or CMBS debt, our ability to obtain long‑term debt may be materially and adversely affected.  As a result, we may acquire real estate assets at a lower than anticipated growth rate, or we may be unable to acquire additional real estate assets.  In addition, this disruption may affect our return on equity as a result of the decrease in the availability of long‑term debt or leverage for us.  Furthermore, a reduction in the difference, or spread, between the rate we earn on our assets and the rate we pay on our liabilities (primarily our long‑term debt), which would occur if the interest rates available to us on future debt issuances increase faster than the lease rates we can charge our customers on STORE Properties we acquire and lease back to them, could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition.

Failure to mitigate our exposure to interest rate volatility changes may materially and adversely affect us.  We attempt to mitigate our exposure to interest rate risk by entering into long‑term fixed-rate financing through the combination of periodic debt offerings under STORE Master Funding, our ABS conduit, through discrete non‑recourse secured borrowings, through insurance company and bank borrowings, by laddering our borrowing maturities and by using leases that generally provide for rent escalations during the term of the lease.  However, the weighted average term of our borrowings does not match the weighted average term of our investments, and the methods we employ to mitigate our exposure to changes in interest rates involve risks, including the risk that the debt markets are volatile and tend to reflect the conditions of the then‑current economic climate.  Our efforts may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes.  Failure to effectively mitigate our exposure to changes in interest rates may materially and adversely affect us by increasing our cost of capital and reducing the net returns we earn on our portfolio.

A significant portion of our assets have been pledged to secure the borrowings of our subsidiaries.    A significant portion of our investment portfolio consists of assets owned by our consolidated, bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity subsidiaries that have been pledged to secure the long‑term borrowings of those subsidiaries.  As of December 31, 2014, the total outstanding principal balance of non‑recourse debt obligations of our consolidated special purpose entity subsidiaries was $1.3 billion, and approximately $1.9 billion in assets held by those subsidiaries had been pledged to secure those borrowings.  We or our other consolidated subsidiaries are the equity owners of these special purpose entities, meaning we are entitled to the excess cash flows after debt service and all other required payments are made on the debt of these entities.    If our subsidiaries fail to make the required payments on this indebtedness, distributions of excess cash flow to us may be reduced or suspended and the indebtedness may become immediately due and payable.  If the subsidiaries are unable to pay the accelerated indebtedness, the pledged assets could be foreclosed upon and distributions of excess cash flow to us may be suspended or terminated.  In this case, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be materially and adversely affected.

Loss of our key personnel could materially impair our ability to operate successfully.    As an internally managed company, our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to make distributions to our stockholders depends upon the performance of our senior leadership team. We rely on our senior leadership team to, among other things, identify and consummate acquisitions, design and implement our financing strategies, manage our investments and conduct our day‑to‑day operations.  In particular, our success depends upon the performance of Mr. Volk, our Chief Executive Officer, and other members of our senior leadership team.

We cannot guarantee the continued employment of any of the members of our senior leadership team, who may choose to leave our company for any number of reasons, such as other business opportunities, differing views on our strategic direction or other personal reasons.  We rely on the experience, efforts and abilities of these individuals, each of whom would be difficult to replace.  The employment agreements we have entered into with each of these executives do not guarantee their continued service to us.  The loss of services of one or more members of our senior leadership team, or our inability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, could adversely affect our business, diminish our investment opportunities and weaken our relationships with lenders, business partners, existing and prospective tenants and industry personnel, all of which could materially and adversely affect us.

We have a limited operating history, and our past experience may not be sufficient to allow us to successfully operate as a public company going forward.  We commenced business in May 2011.  We cannot assure you that our past experience will be sufficient to successfully operate our company as a publicly traded company, including the requirements to timely meet disclosure requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and comply with the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act.  We  are required to develop and implement disclosure and control systems and procedures to satisfy our periodic and current reporting requirements under applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange

12


 

Table of Contents

Commission, or SEC, regulations and comply with the NYSE listing standards, and this transition could place a significant strain on our management systems, infrastructure and other resources.  Failure to operate successfully as a public company could materially and adversely affect us.

Our success depends in part on the creditworthiness of our customers, and we lease most of our properties to non-rated customers.  Our underwriting and risk‑management procedures that we use to evaluate a potential customer’s credit risk may be faulty, deficient or otherwise fail to accurately reflect the risk of our investment.    Our customers are mostly middle‑market companies, which generally are not rated by a nationally recognized rating agency.  We use external and internal tools to evaluate risk and predict the risk of default.  When we review a potential investment, we view our sources of payment to be, in order of priority, unit‑level profitability, tenant credit quality and residual real estate valuation.  Additionally, we review a potential customers management team and the macroeconomic trends of the industry in which that customer operates.  We evaluate the risk of company insolvency using a third‑party model, Moodys Analytics RiskCalc, which is a model for predicting private company defaults based on Moodys Analytics Credit Research Database and which provides us an Estimated Default Frequency, or EDF, for each of our customers.  We then estimate the risk of lease or loan rejection by assigning a probability of termination based on the unit‑level fixed charge coverage ratio, or unit FCCRs, at the property or properties we own.  We then estimate the long‑term default risk of an investment by multiplying the EDF score by our estimated probability that our lease will be rejected in bankruptcy, which we call the STORE Score.

Our methods may not adequately assess the risk of an investment.  Moodys Analytics RiskCalc, our methodology of estimating probability of lease rejection and the STORE Score may be inaccurate, incomplete or otherwise fail to adequately assess default risk.  An EDF score from Moodys Analytics RiskCalc is not the same as a published credit rating and lacks the extensive company participation that is typically involved when a rating agency publishes a rating.  EDF scores and FCCRs are calculated based on financial information provided to us by our customers and prospective customers without independent verification by us.  The probability of lease rejection we assign an investment based on unit FCCR or other factors may be inaccurate.  Moreover, the risks we have identified as our principal risks may omit significant risks to our investments.  If our underwriting procedures fail to properly assess the unit‑level profitability, tenant or corporate credit risk or real estate value of potential investments, then we may invest in properties that result in tenant defaults, and we may be unable to recover our investment by re‑leasing or selling the related property, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial position.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of any of our tenants could result in the termination of such tenant’s lease and material losses to us.    A tenant bankruptcy or insolvency could diminish the rental revenue we receive from that property or could force us to take back a property as a result of a default or a rejection of the lease by a tenant in bankruptcy.  Any claims against bankrupt tenants for unpaid future rent would be subject to statutory limitations that would likely result in our receipt, if at all, of rental revenues that are substantially less than the contractually specified rent we are owed under their leases.  In addition, any claim we have for unpaid past rent will likely not be paid in full.  If a tenant becomes bankrupt or insolvent, federal law may prohibit us from evicting such tenant based solely upon such bankruptcy or insolvency.  We may also be unable to re‑lease a terminated or rejected space or re‑lease it on comparable or more favorable terms.

Many of our tenants lease multiple properties from us under master leases.  Bankruptcy laws afford certain protections to a tenant that may also affect the master lease structure.  Subject to certain restrictions, a tenant under a master lease generally is required to assume or reject the master lease as a whole, rather than making the decision on a property‑by‑property basis.  This prevents the tenant from assuming only the better performing properties and terminating the master lease with respect to the poorer performing properties.  If these tenants are considering filing for bankruptcy protection, we may find it necessary to agree to amend their master leases to remove certain underperforming properties rather than risk the tenant rejecting the entire master lease in bankruptcy.  Whether or not a bankruptcy court will require a master lease to be assumed or rejected as a whole depends upon a facts and circumstances analysis.  A bankruptcy court will consider a number of factors, including the parties intent, the nature and purpose of the relevant documents, whether there was separate and distinct consideration for each property included in the master lease, the provisions contained in the relevant documents and applicable state law.  If a bankruptcy court allows a master lease to be rejected in part, certain underperforming leases related to properties we own could be rejected by the tenant in bankruptcy, thereby adversely affecting payments derived from the properties.  As a result, tenant bankruptcies could materially and adversely affect us.

13


 

Table of Contents

Our financial monitoring, periodic site inspections and selective property sales may fail to mitigate the risk of customer defaults, and if a customer defaults, we may experience difficulty or a significant delay in re‑leasing or selling the property.    Our portfolio‑management activities, including financial monitoring, periodic site inspections and selective property sales, may be insufficient to prevent or reduce the frequency of tenant defaults.    If a tenant defaults, it will likely cause a significant or complete reduction in our revenue from that property for some time. If a defaulting tenant is unable to recover financially, we may have to re‑lease or sell the property.  Re‑leasing or selling properties may take a significant amount of time, during which the property might have a negative cash flow to us and we may incur other related expenses.  We may also have to renovate the property, reduce the rent or provide an initial rent abatement or other incentive to attract a potential tenant or buyer before we can re‑lease or sell the property. During this period, we likely will incur ongoing expenses for property maintenance, taxes, insurance and other costs.  Therefore, tenant defaults could materially and adversely affect us.

As leases expire, we may be unable to renew those leases or re‑lease the space on favorable terms or at all.    Our success depends in part upon our ability to cause our properties to be occupied and generating revenue.  As of December 31, 2014, leases and loans representing approximately 10% of our annualized base rent and interest will expire prior to 2025.  We cannot guarantee you that we will be able to renew leases or re‑lease space (i) without an interruption in the rental revenue from those properties, (ii) at or above our current rental rates, or (iii) without having to offer substantial rent abatements, tenant improvement allowances, early termination rights or below‑market renewal options.  The difficulty, delay and cost of renewing leases, re‑leasing space and leasing vacant space could materially and adversely affect us.

The geographic concentration of our properties could make us vulnerable to an economic downturn, regulatory changes or acts of nature in those areas, resulting in a decrease in our revenues or other negative impacts on our results of operations.    As of December 31, 2014, the five states from which we derive the largest amount of our annualized base rent and interest were Texas (13.6%), Illinois (6.9%), Georgia (6.0%), Tennessee (5.9%), and Florida (5.0%).    As a result of these concentrations, the conditions of local economies and real estate markets, changes in state or local governmental rules and regulations, acts of nature and other factors in these states could result in a decrease in the demand for the products offered by the businesses operating on the properties in those states, which would have an adverse impact on our customers revenues, costs and results of operations, thereby adversely affecting their ability to meet their obligations to us.

As we continue to acquire properties, we may decrease or fail to increase the diversity of our portfolio.    We have broad authority to invest in any STORE Property that we may identify in the future.  As we continue to acquire properties, our portfolio may become less diverse by tenant, industry or geographic area.  If our portfolio becomes less diverse, the trading price of our common stock may fall, as our business will be more sensitive to the bankruptcy or insolvency of fewer tenants, to changes in consumer trends of a particular industry and to a general economic downturn in a particular geographic area.

A decrease in demand for restaurant space or a downturn in the restaurant industry could materially and adversely affect us.  As of December 31, 2014, real estate investments operated by customers in the restaurant industry represented approximately 28.1% of the dollar amount of our investment portfolio and 27.9% of our annualized base rent and interest, and, in the future, it is likely we will acquire additional restaurant properties.  Because the restaurant industry represents a significant portion of our portfolio, a downturn in the restaurant industry may have a material adverse effect on us.

We have investments in industries that depend upon discretionary spending by consumers.  A reduction in the willingness or ability of consumers to use their discretionary income in the businesses of our customers and potential customers could reduce the demand for our net‑lease solutions.  Most of our portfolio is leased to or financed with customers operating service or retail businesses on our property locations.  Restaurants, early childhood education centers, health clubs, movie theaters and sporting goods stores represent the largest industries in our portfolio; and Gander Mountain, Ashley Furniture HomeStore, Applebees, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen and Starplex Cinemas represent the largest concepts in our portfolio.  The success of most of these businesses depends on the willingness of consumers to use discretionary income to purchase their products or services.  A downturn in the economy could cause consumers to reduce their discretionary spending, which may have a material adverse effect on us.

14


 

Table of Contents

Some of our tenants are subject to government regulation and rely on government funding, which could adversely impact their ability to make timely lease payments to us.  The industries in which some of our tenants operate are subject to government regulation, and these businesses may depend, to various extents, on government funding or reimbursements. For example, tenants in the education industry often rely extensively on local, state and federal government funding for their students tuition payments. In addition, tenants in the healthcare and childcare‑related industries typically receive local, state or federal funding, subsidies or reimbursements. The amount and timing of these various fundings, subsidies and reimbursements depend on various factors beyond our or our tenants control, including government budgets and policies and political issues. Some of these tenants also must satisfy certain licensure or certification requirements in order to qualify for government funding, subsidies or reimbursements. If these tenants fail to satisfy these requirements or otherwise fail to receive government funding, when and as needed, including as a result of tightened government budgets, revised funding policies or otherwise, their cash flow could be materially affected causing them to default on our leases, which could adversely impact our business. As we continue to grow our investment portfolio, we may continue to invest in these industries and expand our business into other industries that operate in highly regulated environments and rely significantly on payments from government payors. Changes in regulatory requirements or government funding policies affecting our tenants may result in lease defaults, which would reduce our revenues and harm our results of operations and financial position.

We may be unable to identify and complete acquisitions of suitable properties, and the competition for acquisitions may reduce the number of acquisitions we can complete, either of which may impede our growth and the continued diversification of our portfolio.    Our ability to continue to acquire suitable properties may be constrained by numerous factors, including the following:

·

Our ability to locate properties with attractive economic terms or lease rates.  We target investments that have a difference, or spread, between our cost of capital and the lease rate of the properties we acquire.  If that difference, or spread, decreases, our ability to profitably grow our company will decrease.

·

We compete with numerous investors, including publicly traded and non‑traded REITs, institutional, private equity and individual investors and other investment funds, some of whom have greater financial resources and more favorable capital costs when compared to us.

·

Since many customers we approach have an historic preference to own, rather than lease, their real estate, our ability to grow requires that we overcome those preferences and convince customers that it is in their best interests to lease, rather than own, their STORE Properties, and we may be unable to do so.

·

After beginning to negotiate the terms of a transaction and during our real property, legal and financial due‑diligence review with respect to a transaction, we may be unable to reach an agreement with the customer or discover previously unknown matters, conditions or liabilities and may be forced to abandon the opportunity after incurring significant costs and diverting managements attention.

·

We may fail to have sufficient equity, adequate capital resources or other financing available to complete acquisitions.

If any of these risks occur, we may be materially and adversely affected.

Insurance on our properties, which our tenants are typically required to maintain, may not adequately cover all losses, and uninsured losses could materially and adversely affect us.    Our leases and loan agreements typically require that our tenants and borrowers maintain insurance of the types and in the amounts that are usual and customary for similar types of commercial property, as reviewed by our independent insurance consultant.  Under certain circumstances, however, we may permit certain tenants and borrowers to self‑insure.  Depending on the location of the property, losses of a catastrophic nature, such as those caused by earthquakes or floods, may be covered by insurance policies that are held by our tenants with limitations, such as large deductibles or co‑payments that a tenant may not be able to meet.

In addition, factors such as inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and others, including terrorism or acts of war, may make any insurance proceeds we receive insufficient to repair or

15


 

Table of Contents

replace a property if it is damaged or destroyed.  In that situation, the insurance proceeds we receive may not be adequate to restore our economic position with respect to the affected real property.  In the event we experience a substantial or comprehensive loss of any of our properties, we may not be able to rebuild such property to its existing specifications without significant capital expenditures, which may exceed any amounts received pursuant to insurance policies, as reconstruction or improvement of such a property would likely require significant upgrades to meet zoning and building code requirements.  The loss of our capital investment in, or anticipated future returns from, our properties due to material uninsured losses could materially and adversely affect us.

Changes in zoning laws may prevent us from restoring a property in the event of a substantial casualty loss.    Due to changes, among other things, in applicable building and zoning ordinances and codes, or zoning laws, affecting certain of our properties that have come into effect after the construction of the properties, certain properties may not comply fully with current zoning laws, including use, parking and setback requirements, but may qualify as permitted non‑conforming uses.  Such changes may limit our or our tenants ability to restore the premises of a property to its previous condition in the event of a substantial casualty loss with respect to the property or the ability to refurbish, expand or renovate such property to remain compliant.  If we are unable to restore a property to its prior use after a substantial casualty loss, we may be unable to re‑lease the space at a comparable rent or sell the property at an acceptable price, which may materially and adversely affect us.

Some of our customers operate under franchise or license agreements, which, if terminated or not renewed prior to the expiration of their leases with us, would likely impair their ability to pay us rent.    As of December 31, 2014, 20% of our customers operated under franchise or license agreements.  Generally, franchise agreements have terms that end earlier than the respective expiration dates of the related leases.  In addition, a tenants or borrowers rights as a franchisee or licensee typically may be terminated and the tenant or borrower may be precluded from competing with the franchisor or licensor upon termination.  Usually, we have no notice or cure rights with respect to such a termination and have no rights to assignment of any such franchise agreement.  This may have an adverse effect on our ability to mitigate losses arising from a default on any of our leases or loans.  A franchisors or licensors termination or refusal to renew a franchise or license agreement would likely have a material adverse effect on the ability of the tenant or borrower to make payments under its lease or loan, which could materially and adversely affect us.

A small percentage of the businesses operating on our properties have limited operating histories, which increases the risk that the tenants operating those businesses may default on rent payments to us. As of December 31, 2014, 29 of the 947 properties in our investment portfolio had been open for less than 12 months or were under construction.  The businesses operating on these properties, whether newly constructed or recently opened, may not perform as anticipated, and the tenant may become unable to pay rent to us, which may materially and adversely affect us.

If a tenant defaults under either the ground lease or mortgage loan of a hybrid lease, we may be required to take judicial or administrative action or begin foreclosure proceedings before we can re‑lease or sell the property.    As of December 31, 2014, 4.7% of our annualized base rent and interest was derived from hybrid leases.  A hybrid lease is a modified sale‑leaseback transaction, where the customer sells us their land, leases the land back from us under a ground lease and we simultaneously make a mortgage loan to the customer secured by the improvements the customer continues to own.  If a customer defaults under a hybrid lease, we may: (1) evict the customer under the ground lease and assume ownership of the improvements; or (2) if required by a court, foreclose on the mortgage loan that is secured by the improvements.  Under a ground lease, we as ground lessor generally become the owner of the improvements on the land at lease maturity or if the tenant defaults.  It is possible that a court could require us to foreclose on the mortgage secured by the improvements rather than simply evicting the defaulting tenant under the ground lease.  If foreclosure is required rather than simple eviction, we might encounter delays and expenses in obtaining possession of the land and improvements, which in turn could delay our ability to sell or re‑lease the property in a prompt manner, which could materially and adversely affect us.

We are subject to risks related to owning commercial real estate that could reduce the value of our properties.    The value of our investments in commercial real estate is subject to the following risks, among others:

·

changes in local real estate conditions in the markets in which our customers operate;

16


 

Table of Contents

·

environmental risks related to the presence of hazardous or toxic substances or materials on our properties;

·

the subjectivity of real estate valuations and changes in such valuations over time;

·

the illiquidity of real estate compared to other financial assets;

·

changes in interest rates and the availability of financing; and

·

changes in the general economic and business climate.

The occurrence of any of the risks described above may cause the value of our real estate to decline, which could materially and adversely affect us.

Global market and economic conditions may materially and adversely affect us and our tenants.    Our business is sensitive to changes in the overall economic conditions that impact our customers financial condition and financing practices.  Adverse economic conditions such as high unemployment levels, interest rates, tax rates and fuel and energy costs may impact the results of our tenants operations, which may impact their ability to meet their obligations to us. During periods of economic slowdown, such as the global and U.S. economic downturn of 2008 and 2009, which resulted in increased unemployment, large‑scale business failures and tight credit markets, demand for real estate may decline, resulting in lower rents we can charge or an increased number of defaults under our existing leases.  Accordingly, a decline in economic conditions could materially and adversely affect us.

Illiquidity of real estate investments and restrictions imposed by the Code could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties and harm our financial condition.    Some of the real estate investments we have made and expect to make in the future may be difficult to sell quickly.  Therefore, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial or investment conditions could be limited.  In particular, these risks could arise from weaknesses in or even the lack of an established market for a property, changes in the financial condition or prospects of prospective purchasers, changes in national or international economic conditions, such as the most recent economic downturn, and changes in laws, regulations or fiscal policies of the jurisdiction in which our properties are located.

In addition, the Code imposes restrictions on a REITs ability to dispose of properties, which restrictions are not applicable to other types of real estate companies.  In particular, the tax laws applicable to REITs effectively require that we hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be in our best interest.  Therefore, we may not be able to vary our portfolio in response to economic or other conditions promptly or on favorable terms, which may materially and adversely affect our operations, cash flow and ability to pay distributions on our common stock.

Inflation may materially and adversely affect us and our tenants. We may experience periods when inflation is greater than the increases in rent provided by many of our leases, in which event rent increases will not keep up with the rate of inflation.  If this occurs, we will not have the source of internal growth we expect.  Also, increased costs may have an adverse impact on our tenants if increases in their operating expenses exceed increases in revenue, which may adversely affect our customers ability to satisfy their financial obligations to us.

Property vacancies could result in significant capital expenditures.    The loss of a tenant, either through lease expiration or tenant bankruptcy or insolvency, may require us to spend significant amounts of capital to renovate the property before it is suitable for a new tenant and cause us to incur significant costs in the form of ongoing expenses for property maintenance, taxes, insurance and other expenses.  Many of the leases we enter into or acquire are for properties that are especially suited to the particular business of the tenants operating on those properties.  Because these properties have been designed or physically modified for a particular tenant, if the current lease is terminated or not renewed, we may be required to renovate the property at substantial costs, decrease the rent we charge or provide other concessions to re‑lease the property.  In addition, if we are required to sell the property, we may have difficulty selling it to a party other than the tenant due to the special purpose for which the property may have been designed or modified.  This potential illiquidity may limit our ability to quickly modify our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions, including tenant demand. These limitations may materially and adversely affect us.

17


 

Table of Contents

The loss of a borrower or the failure of a borrower to make loan payments on a timely basis will reduce our revenues and may cause us to incur substantial costs, which could lead to losses on our investments and reduced returns to our stockholders.    From time to time, we make or assume commercial mortgage loans.  We have also made a limited amount of investments on properties we own or finance in the form of loans secured by equipment or other fixtures owned by our customers.  The success of our loan investments materially depends on the financial stability of our borrowers.  The success of our borrowers depends on each of their individual businesses and their industries, which could be affected by economic conditions in general, changes in consumer trends and preferences and other factors over which neither they nor we have control.  A default of a borrower on its loan payments to us that would prevent us from earning interest or receiving a return of the principal of our loan could materially and adversely affect us.  In the event of a default, we may also experience delays in enforcing our rights as lender and may incur substantial costs in collecting the amounts owed to us and in liquidating any collateral.

Foreclosure and other similar proceedings used to enforce payment of real estate loans are generally subject to principles of equity, which are designed to relieve the indebted party from the legal effect of that partys default.  Foreclosure and other similar laws may limit our right to obtain a deficiency judgment against the defaulting party after a foreclosure or sale.  The application of any of these principles may lead to a loss or delay in the payment on loans we hold, which in turn could reduce the amounts we have available to make distributions.  Further, in the event we have to foreclose on a property, the amount we receive from the foreclosure sale of the property may be inadequate to fully pay the amounts owed to us by the borrower and our costs incurred to foreclose, repossess and sell the property, which could materially and adversely affect us.

Our investments in mortgage loans may be affected by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of those loans.    As of December 31, 2014, we had investments in mortgage loans having an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $65 million.  Investments in mortgage loans are subject to the risk of default by the borrowers and interest‑rate risks.  To the extent we incur delays in liquidating defaulted mortgage loans, we may not be able to obtain all amounts due to us under such loans.  Further, the values of the properties securing the mortgage loans may not remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of those mortgage loans or the dates of our investment in the loans.  If the values of the underlying properties decline, the value of the collateral securing our mortgage loans will also decline, and if we were to foreclose on any of the properties securing the mortgage loans, we may not be able to sell or lease them for an amount equal to the unpaid amounts due to us under the mortgage loans.  As a result, defaults on mortgage loans in which we may invest may materially and adversely affect us.

Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and fire, safety and other regulations may require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures that could materially and adversely affect us.    Our properties are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA.  Under the ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons.  Compliance with the ADA could require us to modify the properties we own or may purchase to remove architectural and communication barriers in order to make our properties readily accessible to and usable by disabled individuals, and may restrict renovations on our properties.  Failure to comply with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants, as well as the incurrence of the costs of making modifications to attain compliance.  Future legislation could impose additional obligations or restrictions on our properties.  Our tenants and borrowers are generally responsible to maintain and repair our properties pursuant to our lease and loan agreements, including compliance with the ADA and other similar laws and regulations, but we could be held liable as the owner of the property for their failure to comply with the ADA or other similar laws and regulations.  Any required changes could involve greater expenditures than anticipated or the changes might be made on a more accelerated basis than anticipated, either of which could adversely affect the ability of our tenants to cover such costs.  If we are subject to liability under the ADA or similar laws and regulations as an owner and our tenants are unable to cover the cost of compliance or if we are required to expend our own funds to comply with the ADA or similar laws and regulations, we could be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, our properties are subject to various laws and regulations relating to fire, safety and other regulations, and in some instances, common‑area obligations.  Our tenants and borrowers have primary responsibility for compliance with these requirements pursuant to our lease and loan agreements.  Our tenants and borrowers may not have the financial ability to fully comply with these regulations.  If our tenants and borrowers are unable to comply with these regulations, they may be unable to pay rent on time or may default, or we may have to make substantial capital expenditures to comply with these regulations, which we may not be able to recoup from our tenants and

18


 

Table of Contents

borrowers.  We may also face owner liability for failure to comply with these regulations, which may lead to the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.  Therefore, the failure of our tenants and borrowers to comply with these regulations could materially and adversely affect us.

The costs of compliance with or liabilities related to environmental laws may materially and adversely affect us.  Our properties may be subject to known and unknown environmental liabilities under various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to human health and the environment.  Certain of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on certain statutory classes of persons, including owners or operators, for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties.  These laws and regulations apply to past and present business operations on the properties, and the use, storage, handling and recycling or disposal of hazardous substances or wastes.  We may face liability regardless of our knowledge of the contamination, the timing of the contamination, the cause of the contamination or the party responsible for the contamination of the property.  Our leases and loans typically impose obligations on our tenants and borrowers to indemnify us from all or most compliance costs we may experience as a result of the environmental conditions on our properties, but if a tenant or borrower fails to, or cannot, comply, we may be required to pay such costs.  We cannot predict whether in the future, new or more stringent environmental laws will be enacted or how such laws will impact the operations of businesses on our properties.  Costs associated with an adverse environmental event could be substantial, and the potential liability as to any of our properties is generally not limited under such laws and regulations and could significantly exceed the value of such property.

Under the laws of many states, contamination on a site may give rise to a lien on the site for clean‑up costs.  In several states, such a lien has priority over all existing liens, including those of existing mortgages.  In these states, a lien of a mortgage may lose its priority to such a superlien.  If any of the properties on which we have a mortgage are or become contaminated and subject to a superlien, we may not be able to recover the full value of our investment and may be materially and adversely affected.

Certain federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the use, removal and/or replacement of underground storage tanks in the event of a release on, or an upgrade or redevelopment of, certain properties.  Such laws, as well as common‑law standards, may impose liability for any releases of hazardous substances associated with the underground storage tanks and may provide for third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of such properties for damages associated with such releases.  If hazardous substances are released from any underground storage tanks on any of our properties, we may be materially and adversely affected.

In a few states, transfers of some types of sites are conditioned upon cleanup of contamination prior to transfer, including in cases where a lender has become the owner of the site through a foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise.  If any of our properties are subject to such contamination, we may be subject to substantial clean‑up costs before we are able to sell or otherwise transfer the property.

Certain federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos‑containing materials, or ACMs, in the event of the remodeling, renovation or demolition of a building. Such laws, as well as common‑law standards, may impose liability for releases of ACMs and may impose fines and penalties against us or our tenants for failure to comply with these requirements or provide for third parties to seek recovery from us or our tenants.

If we or our tenants or borrowers become subject to any of the above‑ mentioned environmental risks, we may be materially and adversely affected.

Our properties may contain or develop harmful mold, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediation.    When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time.  Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants.  Exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions.  If our tenants or their employees or customers are exposed to mold at any of our properties, we could be required to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property.  In addition, exposure to mold by our tenants or others could subject us to liability if property damage or health concerns arise.  If we were to become subject to significant mold‑related liabilities, we could be materially and adversely affected, which could harm our business.

19


 

Table of Contents

Our proprietary IT platform may not capture all of the necessary information to allow us to properly monitor and analyze our tenants’ and borrowers’ credit risk, which may materially and adversely affect us.    We have a proprietary information technology, or IT, platform, which we developed to proactively manage our investment portfolio. Our IT platform offers customer relationship management and general ledger and servicing system integration.  Another component of our IT platform is the STORE Universal Database System, or SUDS, which provides our management with access to lease abstracts, tenant information, document scans, property data and servicing information.  Our IT platform and SUDS may not capture all the information needed to mitigate the risk of tenant or borrower default.

Our revenues and expenses are not directly correlated and, because a large percentage of our costs and expenses are fixed, we may not be able to adapt our cost structure to offset declines in our revenue.    Most of the expenses associated with our business, such as our office rent, certain acquisition costs, insurance, employee wages and benefits and other general corporate expenses, are relatively inflexible and will not necessarily decrease with a reduction in revenue from our business.  Our expenses also will be affected by inflationary increases, and certain of our cost increases may exceed the rate of inflation in any given period.  By contrast, our revenue is affected by many factors beyond our control, such as the economic conditions of the markets where we own properties.  As a result, we may not be able to fully offset rising costs by increasing our rents, which could have a material and adverse effect on us.

We may become subject to litigation, which could materially and adversely affect us.    In the future we may become subject to litigation, including claims relating to our operations, debt and equity offerings and otherwise in the ordinary course of business.  Some of these claims may result in significant defense costs and potentially significant judgments against us, some of which are not, or cannot be, insured against.  We generally intend to defend ourselves, but we cannot be certain of the ultimate outcomes of any claims that may arise.  Resolution of these types of matters against us may result in our having to pay significant fines, judgments or settlements, which, if uninsured, or if the fines, judgments and settlements exceed insured levels, could adversely impact our earnings and cash flows, thereby materially and adversely affecting us. Certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation may affect the availability or cost of some of our insurance coverage, which could materially and adversely impact us, expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured and materially and adversely impact our ability to attract directors and officers.

Our portfolio of tenants and borrowers may be riskier than portfolios comprised of rated investment‑grade companies.    Most of our customers have not been assigned a credit rating by any nationally recognized rating agency.    Our method of determining creditworthiness of potential customers may be less comprehensive and detailed than the process by which nationally recognized rating agencies assign company credit ratings.  As a result, our investment portfolio of tenants and borrowers may be riskier than a portfolio comprised of rated investment‑grade companies.

We may not acquire the properties that we evaluate in our pipeline.    We actively maintain a multi-billion dollar pipeline of investment opportunities.  However, we typically close only a small percentage (approximately 5%) of all transactions we evaluate.   Transactions may fail to close for a variety of reasons, including the discovery of previously unknown liabilities or other items uncovered during our diligence process.  Similarly, we may never execute binding purchase agreements with respect to properties that are currently subject to non‑binding letters of intent, and properties with respect to which we are negotiating may never lead to the execution of any letter of intent.  For many other reasons, we may not ultimately acquire the remaining properties currently in our pipeline. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on the concept of a pipeline as we have referred to in this Annual Report.

Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure

Our controlling stockholder has substantial influence over our business, and its interests, and the interests of certain members of our management, may differ from our interests or those of our other stockholders.    Our controlling stockholder beneficially owns approximately 72% of our outstanding common stock.  As a result, our controlling stockholder has the power to elect a majority of our directors and, consequently, appoint our executive officers, set our management policies and exercise overall control over us and our subsidiaries.

The interests of our controlling stockholder may differ from the interests of our other stockholders, and the concentration of control in our controlling stockholder will limit other stockholders ability to influence corporate matters.  In addition, certain members of our management have certain ownership interests in the holding company through which our controlling stockholder owns our securities, which may cause them to have interests that differ from

20


 

Table of Contents

our other stockholders.  The concentration of ownership and voting power of our controlling stockholder may also delay, defer or even prevent an acquisition by a third party or other change of control of our company and may make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of our controlling stockholder, even if such events are in the best interests of our other stockholders.  The concentration of voting power that our controlling stockholder has may have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.  As a result of our being controlled by a controlling stockholder, we may take actions that our other stockholders do not view as beneficial, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and cause the value of your investment in us to decline.  

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE’s rules, and, as a result, qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.  You will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.  Our controlling stockholder controls a majority of the combined voting power of all classes of our stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors.  As a result, we are a controlled company within the meaning of the corporate‑governance standards of the NYSE.  Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power in the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company is a controlled company and may elect not to comply with certain corporate‑governance requirements, including but not limited to the following:

·

having a board that is composed of a majority of independent directors, as defined under the rules of such exchange;

·

having a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors; and

·

having a nominating and corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.

We  currently use, and intend to continue to use, all of these exemptions.  As a result, a majority of the directors on our board of directors are not independent.  In addition, although we have a fully independent audit committee, our compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees do not consist entirely of independent directors.  Accordingly, you do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.

Our board of directors may change our investment strategy, financing strategy or leverage policies without stockholder consent.    Our board of directors, which our controlling stockholder has the right to elect for the foreseeable future, may change any of our strategies, policies or procedures with respect to property acquisitions and divestitures, asset allocation, growth, operations, indebtedness, financing and distributions at any time without the consent of our stockholders, which could result in our acquiring properties that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the types of single‑tenant real estate and related investments described in this Annual Report.    These changes could materially and adversely affect us.

Our board’s power to increase the number of authorized shares of our stock without stockholder approval may negatively impact our existing stockholders.    Our charter authorizes our board of directors, with the approval of a majority of the board of directors and without stockholder approval, to amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we are authorized to issue.  Accordingly, our board could authorize the issuance of shares of common stock or another class or series of stock, including a class or series of preferred stock, that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us that our existing stockholders may view as favorable.  In addition, our board may increase our authorized stock in order to issue additional shares in connection with future financings and other transactions.  These additional issuances could dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders.

If we fail to implement and maintain an effective system of integrated internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results.  As a publicly traded company, we are required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act, which requires, among other things, that we establish and maintain effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and effective disclosure controls and procedures for making required filings with the SEC.  Effective internal and disclosure controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a public company. If we cannot provide

21


 

Table of Contents

reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our reputation and operating results would be harmed, which could depress the trading price of our common stock.

Designing and implementing an effective system of integrated internal controls is a continuous effort that requires significant resources and devotion of time.  As part of the ongoing monitoring of internal controls required of publicly traded companies, we may discover significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls.  As a result of deficiencies or weaknesses that may be identified in our internal controls, we may also identify certain deficiencies in some of our disclosure controls and procedures that we believe require remediation. If we discover deficiencies or weaknesses, we will make efforts to improve our internal and disclosure controls.  However, we may not be successful.  In addition, as an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until the date we are no longer an emerging growth company.” 

Any failure to maintain effective controls or timely effect any necessary improvement of our internal and disclosure controls could harm operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, which could affect our ability to remain listed with the NYSE.  Ineffective internal and disclosure controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which would likely materially and adversely affect us.

We will continue to incur significant expenses as a result of being a public company, which will negatively impact our financial performance.    We incur, and will continue to incur, significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses as a result of being a public company.  The Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd‑Frank Act, and the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act, as well as related rules implemented by the SEC and the NYSE, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies.  Although the JOBS Act may for a limited period of time lessen the cost of complying with some of these additional regulatory and other requirements, we nonetheless have experienced a substantial increase in legal, accounting, insurance and certain other expenses, which will negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.  In addition, rules that the SEC is implementing or is required to implement pursuant to the Dodd‑Frank Act are expected to require additional changes.  We expect that compliance with these and other similar laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act, will substantially increase our expenses, including our legal and accounting costs, and make some activities more time‑consuming and costly.  We also expect these laws, rules and regulations to make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage, which may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as officers.

We are an emerging growth company, and the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.    We are an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act.  We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest to occur of:

·

the last day of the fiscal year during which our total annual revenue equals or exceeds $1 billion (subject to adjustment for inflation);

·

the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our IPO, which occurred in November 2014;

·

the date on which we have, during the previous three‑year period, issued more than $1 billion in non‑convertible debt; or

·

the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non‑affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

We may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy or information statements and exemptions from the

22


 

Table of Contents

requirements of holding a non‑binding advisory vote on executive compensation and seeking stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved, except we have irrevocably elected not to take advantage of the extension of time to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards available under Section 102(b) of the JOBS Act.  We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions.  If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our per share trading price may be adversely affected and more volatile.

Risks Related to Our Tax Status and Other Tax Related Matters

We would incur adverse tax consequences if we fail to qualify as a REIT.    We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code.  Our qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous requirements, some on an annual and quarterly basis, established under highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations, and which involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control.  We expect that our current organization and methods of operation will enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT, but we may not so qualify or we may not be able to remain so qualified in the future.  In addition, U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs and other corporations and the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended at any time, potentially with retroactive effect.  Future legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or adversely affect our stockholders.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, and would not be allowed to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in computing our taxable income.  Also, unless the Internal Revenue Service granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we could not re‑elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which we first failed to qualify as a REIT.  The additional tax liability from the failure to qualify as a REIT would reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for investment or distribution to our stockholders.  This would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities and our ability to raise additional capital. In addition, we would no longer be required to make distributions to our stockholders.  Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will continue to be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.

Dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates.    In general, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends that constitute qualified dividend income paid to individuals, trusts and estates is 20%.  Unlike dividends received from a corporation that is not a REIT, our distributions generally are not eligible for the reduced rates.  Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, investors who are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non‑REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including the per share trading price of our common stock.

We may conduct a portion of our business through taxable REIT subsidiaries, which are subject to certain tax risks.    We have established a taxable REIT subsidiary and may establish others in the future.  Despite our qualification as a REIT, our taxable REIT subsidiaries must pay income tax on their taxable income.  In addition, we must comply with various tests to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and our income from and investments in our taxable REIT subsidiaries generally do not constitute permissible income and investments for these tests.  Our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries may adversely affect our REIT qualification.  Furthermore, we may be subject to a 100% penalty tax, we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on real property sales, or our taxable REIT subsidiaries may be denied deductions, to the extent our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not deemed to be arms length in nature or are otherwise not permitted under the Code.

The Internal Revenue Service may treat sale‑leaseback transactions as loans, which could jeopardize our REIT status or require us to make an unexpected distribution.    The Internal Revenue Service may take the position that specific sale‑leaseback transactions that we treat as leases are not true leases for federal income tax purposes but are, instead, financing arrangements or loans.  If a sale‑leaseback transaction were so re‑characterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT asset tests, the income tests or distribution requirements and consequently lose our REIT status effective with the year of re‑characterization unless we elect to make an additional distribution to maintain our REIT status.

23


 

Table of Contents

REIT distribution requirements limit our available cash.  As a REIT, we are subject to annual distribution requirements, which limit the amount of cash we retain for other business purposes, including amounts to fund our growth.  We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our net REIT taxable income, excluding any net capital gain, in order for our distributed earnings to not be subject to corporate income tax.  We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the requirements of the Code.  However, differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us to sell assets or borrow funds on a short‑term or long‑term basis to meet the 90% distribution requirement of the Code, even if the prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings.

Certain property transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on gain attributable to the transaction.    From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties.  Under the Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties that we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business would be treated as income from a prohibited transaction and subject to a 100% penalty tax.  Since we acquire properties for investment purposes, we do not believe that our occasional transfers or disposals of property are prohibited transactions.  However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction.  The Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or disposals of properties by us are prohibited transactions.  If the Internal Revenue Service were to argue successfully that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited transaction, then we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction and we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on real property sales.  In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

We could face possible state and local tax audits and adverse changes in state and local tax laws.    As discussed in the risk factors above, because we are organized and qualify as a REIT, we are generally not subject to federal income taxes, but we are subject to certain state and local taxes.  From time to time, changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which may result in an increase in our tax liability.  A shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in which we own properties may lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such changes.  If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional state and local taxes.  These increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition and the amount of cash available for the payment of distributions to our stockholders.  In the normal course of business, entities through which we own real estate may also become subject to tax audits.    If such entities become subject to state or local tax audits, the ultimate result of such audits could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Qualifying as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Code. Our qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist.  Even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize our REIT qualification.  Moreover, new legislation, court decisions or administrative guidance, in each case possibly with retroactive effect, may make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT.  Our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis.  Our ability to satisfy the REIT income and asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals, and upon our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis.  In addition, our ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT depends in part on the actions of third parties over which we have no control or only limited influence, including in cases where we own an equity interest in an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

24


 

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Changes in market conditions and volatility of stock prices could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.    The stock markets, including the NYSE, on which we list our common stock, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations.  As a result, the market price of our common stock could be similarly volatile, and investors in our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects.  In addition to the risks listed in this “Risk Factors” section, a number of factors could negatively affect the price per share of our common stock, including:

·

general market and economic conditions;

·

actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or dividends or our payment of dividends in shares of our common stock;

·

changes in our funds from operations or earnings estimates;

·

difficulties or inability to access capital or extend or refinance existing debt;

·

changes in market valuations or similar companies;

·

publication of research reports about us or the real estate industry;

·

the general reputation of real estate investment trusts and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities;

·

general stock and bond market conditions, including changes in interest rates on fixed income securities, that may lead prospective purchasers of our stock to demand a higher annual yield from future dividends;

·

a change in analyst ratings;

·

additions or departures of key management personnel;

·

adverse market reaction to any additional debt we may incur in the future;

·

speculation in the press or investment community;

·

terrorist activity which may adversely affect the markets in which our securities trade, possibly increasing market volatility and causing further erosion of business and consumer confidence and spending;

·

failure to qualify as a REIT;

·

strategic decisions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestments, spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments or changes in business strategy;

·

failure to satisfy listing requirements of the NYSE;

·

governmental regulatory action and changes in tax laws; and

·

the issuance of additional shares of our common stock, or the perception that such sales might occur.

Many of the factors listed above are beyond our control.  These factors may cause the market price of shares of our common stock to decline, regardless of our financial condition, results of operations, business or our prospects.

25


 

Table of Contents

Limitations on share ownership and limitations on the ability of our stockholders to effect a change in control of us restrict the transferability of our stock and may prevent takeovers that are beneficial to our stockholders.  One of the requirements for maintenance of our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes is that no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned by five or fewer individuals, including entities specified in the Code, during the last half of any taxable year.  Our charter contains ownership and transfer restrictions relating to our stock to assist us in complying with this and other REIT ownership requirements, among other purposes.  However, the restrictions may have the effect of preventing a change of control that does not threaten REIT status.  These restrictions include a provision in our charter that generally limits ownership by any person of more than 9.8% of the value of our outstanding stock or 9.8% (in value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common stock, unless our board of directors exempts the person from such ownership limitation.  Absent such an exemption from our board of directors, the transfer of our stock to any person in excess of the applicable ownership limit, or any transfer of shares of such stock in violation of the ownership requirements of the Code for REITs, may be void under certain circumstances, and the intended transferee of such stock will acquire no rights in such shares.  These provisions of our charter may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing someone from taking control of us, even though a change of control might involve a premium price for our stockholders or might otherwise be in our stockholders best interests.

A substantial portion of our total outstanding common stock may be sold into the market at any time.  This could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well, and make it difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future.    The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock or the perception that such sales could occur.  These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at times or prices that we deem appropriate.    

If we raise additional capital through the issuance of new equity securities, your interest in us will be diluted.    We may, and will likely, have to issue additional equity securities periodically to finance our growth.  If we raise additional capital through the issuance of new equity securities, your interest in us will be diluted, which could cause you to lose all or a portion of your investment.  If we are unable to access the public markets in the future, or if our performance or prospects decrease, we may need to consummate a private placement or public offering of our common stock or preferred stock.  In addition, any new securities we may issue, such as preferred stock, may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those securities held by you.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our company, or if they issue unfavorable commentary about us or our industry or downgrade the outlook of our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline.    The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that third‑party securities analysts publish about our company and our industry.  One or more analysts could downgrade the outlook of our common stock or issue other negative commentary about our company or our industry.  In addition, we may be unable or slow to attract additional research coverage.  Furthermore, if one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company, we could lose visibility in the market. As a result of one or more of these factors, the trading price of our common stock could decline and cause you to lose all or a portion of your investment.

We may change the dividend policy for our common stock in the future.    The decision to declare and pay dividends on our common stock, as well as the form, timing and amount of any such future dividends, is at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual prohibitions or other limitations under our indebtedness, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, state law and such other factors as our board of directors considers relevant.  Any change in our dividend policy could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect purchasers of our common stock.  In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of the federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in our common stock.  Changes are likely to continue to occur in the future, and these changes could adversely affect our stockholders investment in our common stock.  These changes include but are not limited to the reduction or elimination of the corporate income tax under the Code.  Any of these changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our common stock or on the market value or resale potential of our common stock.  Stockholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the impact

26


 

Table of Contents

that recent legislation may have on their investment and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on their investment in our stock.

Item 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 2.  PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2014, our total investment in real estate and loans approximated $2.8 billion, representing investments in 947 property locations,  substantially all of which are profit centers for our customers.  These investments generate our cash flows from more than 350 contracts predominantly structured as net leases, mortgage loans and combinations of leases and mortgage loans, or hybrid leases.  All of our owned single‑tenant properties are subject to leases; the weighted average non‑cancellable remaining term of our leases at December 31, 2014 was 15 years.

Our real estate portfolio is highly diversified.  As of December 31, 2014, our 947 property locations are operated by 226 customers across 46 states.  None of our customers represented more than 4% of our portfolio at December 31, 2014, and our top ten largest customers represented less than 21% of annualized base rent and interest.  Our customers operate their businesses across 208 brand names or business concepts in more than 65 industries.  Our top five concepts as of December 31, 2014 were Gander Mountain, Ashley Furniture HomeStore, Applebees, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen and Starplex Cinemas; combined, these concepts represented 15% of annualized base rent and interest.  Our top five industries as of December 31, 2014 are restaurants, early childhood education centers, health clubs, movie theaters and sporting goods stores.  Combined, these industries represented 55% of annualized base rent and interest.  

Diversification by Customer

As of December 31, 2014, our 947 property locations were operated by our 226 customers.  The following table identifies our ten largest customers as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

% of

    

 

 

 

 

Annualized

 

 

 

 

 

Base Rent

 

Number

 

 

 

and

 

of

 

Customer

 

Interest (1)

 

Properties

 

Gander Mountain Company

 

3.52 

%

12 

 

Starplex Master Holdings, Inc.

 

3.03 

 

10 

 

O’Charley’s LLC

 

2.40 

 

30 

 

Sailormen, Inc.

 

1.91 

 

41 

 

FreedomRoads, LLC

 

1.84 

 

 

Rainbow Early Education Holding, LLC

 

1.70 

 

34 

 

Heald College, LLC

 

1.52 

 

 

Conn’s, Inc.

 

1.49 

 

 

RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc.

 

1.46 

 

17 

 

Hill Country Holdings, LLC

 

1.45 

 

 

All other customers (216 customers)

 

79.68 

 

777 

 

Total

 

100.00 

%

947 

 

 


(1)

Represents the percentage of base rent and interest, annualized based on rates in effect on December 31, 2014, for all of our leases, loans and direct financing receivables in place as of that date.

27


 

Table of Contents

Diversification by Concept

As of December 31, 2014, our customers operated their businesses across 208 concepts.  The following table identifies those concepts as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

% of

    

 

 

 

 

Annualized

 

 

 

 

 

Base Rent

 

Number

 

 

 

and

 

of

 

Customer Business Concept

 

Interest (1)

 

Properties

 

Gander Mountain

 

3.52 

%  

12 

 

Ashley Furniture HomeStore

 

3.31 

 

15 

 

Applebee’s

 

3.01 

 

36 

 

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen

 

2.53 

 

57 

 

Starplex Cinemas

 

2.51 

 

 

O’Charley’s

 

2.40 

 

30 

 

KFC

 

1.85 

 

51 

 

FreedomRoads

 

1.84 

 

 

Rainbow Child Care Center

 

1.70 

 

34 

 

Heald College

 

1.52 

 

 

All other concepts (198 concepts)

 

75.81 

 

691 

 

Total

 

100.00 

%  

947 

 

 


(1)

Represents the percentage of base rent and interest, annualized based on rates in effect on December 31, 2014, for all of our leases, loans and direct financing receivables in place as of that date.

28


 

Table of Contents

Diversification by Industry

As of December 31, 2014, our customers business concepts were diversified across more than 65 industries within the service, retail and industrial sectors of the U.S. economy.   The following table summarizes those industries as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

% of

    

 

    

 

 

 

 

Annualized

 

 

 

Building

 

 

 

Base Rent

 

Number

 

Square

 

 

 

and

 

of

 

Footage 

 

Customer Industry

 

Interest (1)

 

Properties

 

(in thousands)

 

Service:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restaurants—full service

 

17.96 

%  

228 

 

1,641 

 

Restaurants—limited service

 

9.98 

 

236 

 

724 

 

Early childhood education centers

 

8.13 

 

119 

 

1,176 

 

Health clubs

 

7.98 

 

39 

 

1,296 

 

Movie theaters

 

6.89 

 

26 

 

977 

 

Junior colleges

 

2.47 

 

 

640 

 

Colleges and professional schools

 

2.07 

 

 

205 

 

All other service industries (27 industries)

 

17.16 

 

136 

 

3,465 

 

Total service:

 

72.64 

 

798 

 

10,124 

 

Retail:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sporting goods stores

 

4.16 

 

15 

 

983 

 

Furniture stores

 

4.11 

 

20 

 

963 

 

Recreational vehicle dealers

 

1.84 

 

 

207 

 

All other retail industries (9 industries)

 

6.32 

 

46 

 

2,447 

 

Total retail:

 

16.43 

 

89 

 

4,600 

 

Industrial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All industrial (21 industries)

 

10.93 

 

60 

 

5,891 

 

Total

 

100.00 

%  

947 

 

20,615 

 

 


(1)

Represents the percentage of base rent and interest, annualized based on rates in effect on December 31, 2014, for all of our leases, loans and direct financing receivables in place as of that date.

29


 

Table of Contents

Diversification by Geography

Our portfolio is also highly diversified by geography, as our 947 property locations can be found in 46 of the 50 states (excluding Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii and Rhode Island).  The following table details the top ten geographical locations of the properties as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

 

Annualized

 

 

 

 

 

Base Rent

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

Number of

 

State

 

Interest (1)

 

Properties

 

Texas

    

13.57 

%   

81 

 

Illinois

 

6.93 

 

51 

 

Georgia

 

6.02 

 

68 

 

Tennessee

 

5.87 

 

58 

 

Florida

 

5.02 

 

60 

 

Ohio

 

4.88 

 

56 

 

Arizona

 

4.66 

 

35 

 

California

 

4.55 

 

16 

 

North Carolina

 

4.03 

 

73 

 

Pennsylvania

 

3.36 

 

19 

 

All other states (36 states)(2)

 

41.11 

 

430 

 

Total

 

100.00 

%  

947 

 

 


(1)

Represents the percentage of base rent and interest, annualized based on rates in effect on December 31, 2014, for all of our leases, loans and direct financing receivables in place as of that date.

(2)

Includes one property in Ontario, Canada which represents less than 0.2% of annualized base rent and interest.

30


 

Table of Contents

Contract Expirations

The following table sets forth the schedule of our lease, loan and direct financing receivable expirations as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

% of

    

 

 

 

 

Annualized

 

 

 

 

 

Base Rent

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

Number of

 

Year of Lease Expiration or Loan Maturity (1)

 

Interest (2)

 

Properties

 

2015

 

0.40 

%  

 

2016

 

-

 

-

 

2017

 

0.37 

 

 

2018

 

0.44 

 

 

2019

 

1.09 

 

 

2020

 

0.29 

 

 

2021

 

1.23 

 

 

2022

 

0.42 

 

 

2023

 

3.70 

 

38 

 

2024

 

2.47 

 

19 

 

2025

 

1.90 

 

 

2026

 

3.76 

 

30 

 

2027

 

8.91 

 

62 

 

2028

 

16.24 

 

118 

 

2029

 

19.41 

 

201 

 

2030

 

1.17 

 

 

Thereafter

 

38.20 

 

441 

 

Total

 

100.00 

%  

947 

 

 


(1)

Expiration year of contracts in place as of December 31, 2014 and excludes any tenant option renewal periods.

 

(2)

Represents the percentage of base rent and interest, annualized based on rates in effect on December 31, 2014, for all of our leases, loans and direct financing receivables in place as of that date.

Item 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we become party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business and the business of our tenants.   Since our organization in May 2011, we have not been a party, as plaintiff or defendant, to any legal proceedings that we believe to be material or which, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations if determined adversely to us.

Item 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

31


 

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “STOR”.  The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the range of high and low sales prices for the Company’s common stock on the NYSE during fiscal 2014 and distributions declared per share of common stock. The historical stock prices reflected in the following table are not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions

 

 

    

High

    

Low

    

Declared

 

Quarter ended March 31,

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

$

0.2395 

 

Quarter ended June 30,

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

$

0.2455 

 

Quarter ended September 30,

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

$

0.2870 

 

Quarter ended December 31,

 

$

22.46

 

$

19.25

 

$

0.2178 

(1)

 


(1)

Includes a pro-rated dividend per common share of $0.1139, or $1.00 per share on an annualized basis, for the period since the closing of the IPO through December 31, 2014 that was paid in January 2015.

During 2013, we declared quarterly dividends aggregating $0.8743 per share of common stock as follows: quarter ended March 31, $0.2096; quarter ended June 30, $0.2156; quarter ended September 30, $0.2216; and quarter ended December 31, $0.2275.

On March 6, 2015, the closing sale price of our common stock was $21.29 per share on the NYSE, and there were 24 holders of record of the 115,210,809 outstanding shares of our common stock. Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.  We have determined that, for federal income tax purposes, approximately 88.72% of the distributions paid in 2014 represented ordinary income and 6.41% represented long-term capital gain.

Distributions

The Company pays regular quarterly distributions to holders of its common stock.  Future distributions will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our actual funds from operations, financial condition and capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and other factors.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

With proceeds from the IPO, on November 21, 2014 the Company redeemed all of the outstanding shares of its 12.5% Series A Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $1,000.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends.  The Company did not repurchase any other equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Stock Performance Graph

The following performance chart compares, for the period from November 18, 2014 (our first trading day on the NYSE) through December 31, 2014, the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index (the “S&P 500”) and the MSCI US REIT Index.   The chart assumes $100.00 was invested on November 18, 2014 and assumes the reinvestment of any dividends.  The historical stock price performance reflected in the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

32


 

Table of Contents

Picture 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period Ending

 

Index

    

11/18/2014

    

11/19/2014

    

11/26/2014

    

12/3/2014

    

12/10/2014

    

12/17/2014

    

12/24/2014

    

12/31/2014

 

STORE Capital Corporation

 

100.00 

 

101.44 

 

105.59 

 

103.23 

 

103.79 

 

108.67 

 

110.67 

 

111.40 

 

S&P 500

 

100.00 

 

99.88 

 

101.08 

 

101.19 

 

98.89 

 

98.28 

 

101.69 

 

100.60 

 

MSCI US REIT (RMS)

 

100.00 

 

99.20 

 

101.64 

 

102.16 

 

102.90 

 

103.09 

 

104.72 

 

103.86 

 

 

The performance graph and the related chart and text are being furnished solely to accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 201(c) of Regulation S-K, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ours, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Use of Proceeds from the Sale of Registered Securities

Our registration statement on Form S-11, as amended (Registration No. 333-198486), with respect to our IPO was declared effective on November 17, 2014.  On November 21, 2014, the Company completed the IPO through the registration and sale of 31,625,000 shares of common stock, including 4,125,000 shares of common stock sold in connection with the full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase additional shares, raising gross proceeds of approximately $585 million.

As of the date of this Annual Report, our IPO has terminated and all of the securities registered for sale by us pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-11 have been sold. The joint book-running managers of the IPO were Goldman, Sachs & Co., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC. The joint lead managers of the IPO were Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. BMO Capital Markets Corp., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. and Comerica Securities, Inc. acted as co-managers for the IPO.

The expenses of the IPO included approximately $35 million for underwriting discounts and commissions and approximately $4 million of other expenses, for total offering expenses of approximately $39 million. All of the foregoing underwriting discounts and expenses were direct or indirect payments to persons other than: (i) our directors, officers or any of their associates; (ii) persons owning ten percent (10%) or more of our shares of common stock; or (iii) our affiliates.

33


 

Table of Contents

The net proceeds to us from the IPO totaled approximately $546 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses.  Since the completion of the IPO, we used approximately $223 million of the net offering proceeds to repay the outstanding balance under our credit facility, $125,000 to redeem all outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and approximately $243 million to make property acquisitions from the closing date of the IPO through December 31, 2014.  In 2015, we deployed the remainder of the proceeds for property acquisitions.

Item 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables set forth selected consolidated financial and other information of the Company as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from inception (May 17, 2011) through December 31, 2011. The table should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inception

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(May 17,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Through

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Statement of Operations Data:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Total revenues

 

$

190,441 

 

$

108,904 

 

$

40,610 

 

$

3,860 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

67,959 

 

 

39,180 

 

 

11,472 

 

 

1,120 

 

Transaction costs

 

 

2,804 

 

 

2,643 

 

 

387 

 

 

446 

 

Property costs

 

 

473 

 

 

127 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

19,494 

 

 

14,132 

 

 

10,362 

 

 

4,024 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

57,025 

 

 

30,349 

 

 

11,015 

 

 

964 

 

Total expenses

 

 

147,755 

 

 

86,431 

 

 

33,243 

 

 

6,554 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

42,686 

 

 

22,473 

 

 

7,367 

 

 

(2,694)

 

Income tax expense

 

 

180 

 

 

155 

 

 

70 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

42,506 

 

 

22,318 

 

 

7,297 

 

 

(2,699)

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

1,140 

 

 

3,995 

 

 

879 

 

 

677 

 

Income (loss) before gain on dispositions of real estate investments

 

 

43,646 

 

 

26,313 

 

 

8,176 

 

 

(2,022)

 

Gain on dispositions of real estate investments

 

 

4,493 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

48,139 

 

$

26,313 

 

$

8,176 

 

$

(2,022)

 

Per Common Share Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations—basic and diluted

 

$

0.59 

 

$

0.44 

 

$

0.26 

 

$

(0.14)

 

Net income (loss)—basic and diluted

 

 

0.61 

 

 

0.52 

 

 

0.30 

 

 

(0.11)

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

0.9898 

 

 

0.8743 

 

 

0.3509 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Data (at period end):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total real estate investments, at cost (1)

 

$

2,694,557 

 

$

1,643,635 

 

$

870,254 

 

$

230,822 

 

Carrying amount of loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

111,354 

 

 

66,917 

 

 

41,450 

 

 

4,956 

 

Total investment portfolio, gross (1)

 

 

2,805,911 

 

 

1,710,552 

 

 

911,704 

 

 

235,778 

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (1)

 

 

(98,671)

 

 

(42,342)

 

 

(12,005)

 

 

(999)

 

Net investments

 

 

2,707,240 

 

 

1,668,210 

 

 

899,699 

 

 

234,799 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

136,313 

 

 

61,814 

 

 

64,752 

 

 

31,203 

 

Total assets

 

 

2,913,612 

 

 

1,786,100 

 

 

979,833 

 

 

270,468 

 

Credit facilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

160,662 

 

 

29,971 

 

Non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities, net of premiums (discounts)

 

 

1,284,151 

 

 

991,577 

 

 

306,581 

 

 

13,500 

 

Total liabilities

 

 

1,330,928 

 

 

1,012,186 

 

 

482,919 

 

 

49,506 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

1,582,684 

 

 

773,914 

 

 

496,914 

 

 

220,962 

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funds from Operations (2)

 

$

99,383 

 

$

54,843 

 

$

19,014 

 

$

(982)

 

Adjusted Funds from Operations (2)

 

$

109,876 

 

$

61,739 

 

$

21,701 

 

$

(17)

 

Number of investment property locations (at period end)

 

 

947 

 

 

622 

 

 

371 

 

 

112 

 

% of owned properties subject to a lease contract (at period end)

 

 

100 

%  

 

100 

%  

 

100 

%  

 

100 

%  

 


(1)

Includes the dollar amount of investments ($9.4 million) and the accumulated depreciation and amortization ($0.4 million) related to real estate investments held for sale at December 31, 2013.

(2)

For definitions and reconciliations of Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations, see “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non‑GAAP Measures.”

34


 

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the Selected Consolidated Financial Data and Business sections, as well as the consolidated financial statements and related notes in Part II, Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should read Item 1A. Risk Factors and the Forward‑Looking Statements sections of this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by these forward‑looking statements.

Overview

We were formed in 2011 to invest in and manage Single Tenant Operational Real Estate, or STORE Properties, which is our target market and the inspiration for our name.  A STORE Property is a property location at which a company operates its business and generates sales and profits, which makes the location a profit center and, therefore, fundamentally important to that business. Examples of operational real estate include restaurants, early childhood education centers, health clubs, movie theaters, sporting goods stores, furniture stores and colleges and professional schools.  By acquiring the real estate from the operators and then leasing the real estate back to them, they become our long‑term tenants, and we refer to them as our customers. We provide a source of long‑term capital to our customers by enabling them to avoid the need to incur debt and employ equity in order to finance the real estate that is essential to their business.

We are a Maryland corporation organized as an internally managed real estate investment trust, or REIT.  As a REIT, we will generally not be subject to federal income tax to the extent that we distribute all of our taxable income to our stockholders and meet other requirements.    

The growth of our Company from inception in May 2011 until November 2014 was funded by STORE Holding Company, LLC, or STORE Holding, a Delaware limited liability company, substantially all of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by certain investment funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.  In November 2014, we took the Company public on the New York Stock Exchange and now our common stock trades under the ticker symbol “STOR”.  STORE Holding is still our primary stockholder, owning approximately 72% of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2014. In November 2014, prior to our initial public offering, or IPO, our board of directors declared a stock split effected through the distribution of 1.67 shares for each share of common stock then outstanding; accordingly, all share and per share information included in this report has been retroactively restated to take into account the effect of the stock split.

Since our inception in 2011, we have selectively originated a real estate investment portfolio totaling $2.8 billion, consisting of investments in 947 property locations across 46 states. All of the real estate we acquire is held by our wholly-owned subsidiaries, many of which are special purpose bankruptcy remote entities formed to facilitate the financing of our real estate. We predominantly acquire our single‑tenant properties directly from our customers in sale‑leaseback transactions where our customers sell us their operating properties and then simultaneously enter into a long‑term triple‑net lease with us to lease the property back. Accordingly, our properties are fully occupied and under lease from the moment we acquire them. Since inception, our portfolio has remained at 100% occupancy, as all of our properties are subject to leases.   We generate our cash from operations primarily through the monthly lease payments, or base rent, we receive from our customers under their long‑term leases with us. We also receive interest payments on loans receivable, which are a small part of our portfolio. We refer to the monthly scheduled lease and interest payments due from our customers as base rent and interest. Most of our leases contain lease escalations every year or every several years that are based on the lesser of the increase in the Consumer Price Index, or CPI, or a stated percentage (if expressed on an annual basis, currently averaging approximately 1.7%), which allows the monthly lease payments we receive to rise somewhat in an inflationary economic environment. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 97% of our leases (based on annualized base rent) are referred to as triple net, which means that our customer is responsible for all of the maintenance, insurance and property taxes associated with the properties they lease from us, including any increases in those costs that may occur as a result of inflation. The remaining leases have some landlord responsibilities,

35


 

Table of Contents

generally related to maintenance and structural component replacement that may be required on such properties in the future. Also, we will occasionally incur nominal property‑level expenses that are not paid by our customers, such as the costs of periodically making site inspections of our properties. We do not currently anticipate incurring significant capital expenditures or property costs. Since our properties are single‑tenant properties, all of which are under long‑term leases, it is not necessary for us to perform any significant ongoing leasing activities on our properties. As of December 31, 2014, the weighted average remaining term of our leases (calculated based on annualized base rent) was approximately 15 years, excluding renewal options, which are exercisable at the option of our tenants upon expiration of their base lease term. Leases approximating 98% of our base rent as of that date provide for tenant renewal options (generally two to four five‑year options) and leases approximating 4% of our base rent provide our tenant the option, at their election, to purchase the property from us at a specified time or times (generally at the greater of the then‑fair market value or our cost).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At the beginning of 2014, our real estate investment portfolio totaled $1.7 billion, consisting of investments in 622 property locations with base rent and interest due from our customers aggregating approximately $12 million per month, excluding future rent payment escalations. By December 31, 2014, our investment portfolio had grown to $2.8 billion, consisting of investments in 947 property locations with base rent and interest aggregating approximately $19.8 million per month. Substantially all of our cash from operations is generated by our real estate portfolio.

Our primary cash expenditures are the monthly principal and interest payments we make on the debt we use to finance our real estate investment portfolio and the general and administrative expenses of servicing the portfolio and operating our business. Since substantially all of our leases are triple net, our tenants are generally responsible for the maintenance, insurance and property taxes associated with the properties they lease from us.  When a property becomes vacant through a tenant default or expiration of the lease term with no tenant renewal, we would incur these property costs during the time it would take to locate a substitute tenant.  As of December 31, 2014, our portfolio was 100% occupied and leases on only five properties are scheduled to expire during 2015, representing less than one-half of one percent of our annualized base rent and interest.  Accordingly, we do not currently anticipate making significant capital expenditures or incurring other significant property costs.

We intend to continue to grow through additional real estate investments. To accomplish this objective, we must continue to identify real estate acquisitions which are consistent with our underwriting guidelines and raise future additional capital. We acquire real estate with a combination of debt and equity capital and with cash from operations that is not otherwise distributed to our stockholders. Prior to our IPO, our equity capital was provided to us as needed for our real estate acquisition activity by investors in STORE Holding, which is our holding company parent.  In our IPO, which closed on November 21, 2014, we raised $585 million in gross offering proceeds through the sale of 31,625,000 shares of our common stock, including the underwriters’ overallotment.  The proceeds of the offering were used to pay offering expenses totaling $39 million, including the underwriters’ discount, leaving net proceeds of $546 million.  The net proceeds were used to pay off amounts outstanding on our unsecured credit facility totaling $223 million, redeem all of our outstanding preferred stock ($125,000) and, through December 31, 2014, approximately $243 million was deployed to continue to selectively acquire real estate properties.

Our debt capital is provided on a temporary basis through our variable‑rate unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of banks, until our short-term, variable-rate borrowings are sufficiently large to enable the economic issuance of term notes from our Master Funding program. We also, from time to time, obtain non‑recourse mortgage financing from banks and insurance companies secured by specific property we pledge as collateral. By matching the expected cash inflows from our long‑term real estate leases with the expected cash outflows of our long‑term fixed‑rate debt, we “lock in”, for as long as is economically feasible, the expected positive difference between our scheduled cash inflows on the leases and the cash outflows on our debt payments. By “locking in” this difference, or “spread”, we seek to reduce the risk that increases in interest rates would adversely impact our profitability. In addition, we may use various financial instruments designed to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our cash flows and earnings, including hedging strategies such as interest rate caps, depending on our analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies. We target a level of debt within a range of six to seven times our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

36


 

Table of Contents

The availability of debt to finance commercial real estate in the United States can, at times, be impacted by economic and other factors that are beyond our control. An example of this is the period during the recession of 2007 to 2009 when availability of debt capital for commercial real estate was significantly curtailed. We seek to reduce the risk that long‑term debt capital may be unavailable to us by limiting the period between the time we acquire our real estate and the time we finance our real estate with long‑term debt. In addition, we have arranged our short‑term debt facility (described below) to have a multi‑year term in order to reduce the risk that short‑term real estate financing would not be available to us. As we grow our real estate portfolio, we also intend to manage our debt maturities to reduce the risk that a significant amount of our debt will mature in any single year in the future. As of December 31, 2014, we had no significant near-term debt maturities, with balloon payments due during 2015 representing just $19 million, or 1.5%, of our total long-term debt, and our weighted average debt maturity is approximately seven years. As our outstanding debt matures, we may refinance this maturing debt as it comes due or choose to repay it using cash and cash equivalents or our revolving credit facility. Because our long-term debt generally requires monthly payments of principal, in addition to the monthly interest payments, the resulting principal amortization reduces our refinancing risk upon maturity of the debt. The long-term debt we have issued as of December 31, 2014 is comprised, almost exclusively, of secured nonrecourse borrowings with a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 69% and approximately 66% of our portfolio serves as collateral for this long-term debt.  The remaining portfolio properties, aggregating $952 million, are unencumbered and this unencumbered pool of properties provides us flexibility for future borrowings or as substitute collateral for existing indebtedness. 

We raise debt capital through several different markets, including the asset‑backed and commercial mortgage‑backed securities markets, as well as the market for term debt financing. Each of these is described in more detail below. We believe that having access to multiple debt markets increases our financing flexibility because different debt markets may attract different debt investors, thus increasing our access to a potentially larger pool of debt investors. Also, a particular debt market may be more competitive than another at any particular point in time. In addition to these sources of debt capital, our senior leadership team has prior experience with senior secured lines of credit and senior unsecured term debt, which may be deployed as we continue to grow the business and implement our asset‑liability management strategies.

Typically, we use our short‑term unsecured credit facility to acquire our real estate properties, until those borrowings are sufficiently large to warrant the economic issuance of term notes under our Master Funding conduit, the proceeds from which we use to repay the amounts outstanding under our credit facility. In September 2014, we entered into a new $300 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of lenders, which replaced our two previous secured credit facilities that aggregated $300 million. This new facility, which includes an accordion feature that allows the size of the facility to be increased up to $500 million, is for an initial term of three years and includes a one‑year extension option subject to certain conditions and the payment of a 20 basis point extension fee. The facility bears interest at a rate selected by us equal to either one‑month LIBOR plus a leverage‑based credit spread ranging from 1.75% to 2.50%, or a Base Rate, as defined in the debt agreement, plus a leverage‑based credit spread ranging from 0.75% to 1.50%, and also includes a fee of 0.25% assessed on the average unused portion of the facility. Availability under the facility is limited to 50% of the value of our eligible unencumbered assets at any point in time. At December 31, 2014, we had no borrowings outstanding on this new credit facility and we had a pool of unencumbered assets aggregating $952 million, substantially all of which were eligible under the credit facility. Covenants under this new facility include: maximum leverage of 65%, minimum fixed charge coverage of 1.5x, minimum net worth of $600 million plus 75% of new net equity proceeds, and a maximum dividend payout ratio limited to 95% of Funds from Operations, all as defined in the agreement. The facility is recourse to us and includes a guaranty from STORE Capital Acquisitions, LLC, one of our direct wholly‑owned subsidiaries. We remain in compliance with these covenants. Prior to entering into the new $300 million unsecured credit facility, we had two bank credit facilities that were secured by real estate properties we pledged as collateral, as well as our equity interests in certain of our consolidated special purpose subsidiaries and our holdings of the Class B notes issued under our STORE Master Funding debt program described below.

As of December 31, 2014, essentially all of our long‑term debt was fixed‑rate debt, or was effectively converted to a fixed‑rate for the term of the debt. Our primary long‑term debt funding option is STORE Master Funding, which we began to use in 2012. As summarized below, a large portion of our real estate investment portfolio serves as collateral for outstanding borrowings under this debt program. Through this debt program, we arrange for bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity subsidiaries to issue multiple series of investment‑grade asset‑backed net‑lease mortgage notes, or

37


 

Table of Contents

ABS notes, from time to time as additional collateral is added to the collateral pool. The ABS notes are generally issued to institutional investors through the asset‑backed securities market. These ABS notes are issued in two classes, Class A and Class B. The Class A notes, which represent approximately 70% of the appraised value of the underlying real estate collateral, are currently rated A+ by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services. The Class A notes generally require monthly payments of principal and interest with balloon payments due at their respective maturity dates, either seven or 10 years from the date of issuance. We have historically retained the Class B notes, which are subordinated to the Class A notes as to principal repayment. The Class B notes, currently rated BBB by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, aggregate $78.0 million in principal amount outstanding at December 31, 2014 and are held by one of our bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity subsidiaries. The Class B notes are not reflected in our financial statements because they eliminate in consolidation. Since these Class B notes are issued and outstanding, they provide us with additional financial flexibility in that we may sell them to a third party in the future or use them as collateral for short‑term borrowings as we have done from time to time in the past.

Members of our senior leadership team pioneered the concept of serial issuances of rated debt backed by a growing collateral pool of net‑leased commercial real estate in 2005. When we wish to issue additional long‑term debt under the STORE Master Funding debt program, our special purpose entity subsidiaries acquire real estate assets to increase the size of the existing collateral pool sufficiently to support the additional debt. Upon issuance of a new series of debt under this program, the entire collateral pool (including the newly added real estate) will be pledged to secure all of the notes, both the existing and the new series, on a pro rata basis. This has the effect of increasing the diversity of the collateral pool for all of the note holders, including those that invested in prior series. For example, the first Master Funding note series issued in 2012 totaled $214.5 million in Class A principal amount, which was supported by a collateral pool valued at $305.9 million representing 132 property locations operated by 30 customers; those same note holders now hold notes secured by a significantly more diverse pool than when they purchased their investment, with the Master Funding notes outstanding at December 31, 2014 totaling $1.1 billion in Class A principal amount supported by a collateral pool valued at $1.6 billion (on a gross book value of $1.5 billion) representing 608 property locations operated by 147 customers. The amount of debt that can be issued in any new series is determined by the structure of the transaction and the amount of collateral that has been added to the pool. In addition, the issuance of each new series of notes is subject to the satisfaction of several conditions, including that there is no event of default on the existing note series and that the issuance will not result in an event of default on, or the credit rating downgrade of, the existing note series.

Absent a plan to issue additional long‑term debt through the Master Funding program, we are not required to add assets to, or substitute collateral in, the existing collateral pool. We can voluntarily elect to substitute assets in the collateral pool, subject to meeting prescribed conditions that are designed to protect the collateral pool by requiring the substitute assets to be of equal or greater measure in attributes such as: the asset’s fair value, monthly rent payments, remaining lease term and weighted average FCCR. In addition, we can sell underperforming assets and reinvest the proceeds in better performing properties. Any substitutions and sales are subject to an overall limitation of 35% of the collateral pool unless the substitution or sale is credit‑ or risk‑based, in which case there are no limitations. Since our Master Funding program began in 2012, we sold eight properties in the collateral pool, representing less than 1.2% of the collateral pool value, and have since reinvested the proceeds in newly-acquired properties.  

The A+ rating currently assigned to the Class A notes issued under our Master Funding program reflects the rating agency’s opinion of the level of credit enhancement available for the benefit of the note holders. As structured, the Master Funding notes have several layers of credit enhancement—subordination (because the Class B notes are subordinate in payment of principal to the right of the more senior Class A notes); overcollateralization (since our Class A notes have an advance rate of 70%, the other 30% is the “overcollateralization” provided by the equity and the BBB‑rated Class B notes held by STORE Capital); and the last layer of credit enhancement is the excess monthly cash flow generated by the collateral pool after debt service obligations and servicing and trustee expenses have been paid. A significant portion of our cash flows are generated by the special purpose entities comprising our Master Funding program. For the year ended December 31, 2014, excess cash flow, after payment of debt service and servicing and trustee expenses, totaled $51 million on cash collections of $120 million, which represents an overall ratio of cash collections to debt service of approximately 1.7 to 1 on the Master Funding program. If at any time the debt service coverage ratio (as defined in the program documents) generated by the collateral pool is less than 1.3 to 1, excess cash flow from the Master Funding entities will be deposited into a reserve account to be used for payments to be made on the

38


 

Table of Contents

net‑lease mortgage notes, to the extent there is a shortfall. We anticipate that the debt service coverage ratio for the Master Funding program will remain well above program minimums.

We believe our STORE Master Funding program provides us with several advantages, including the ability to:

·

create a growing diversified pool of properties and realize resultant competitive debt costs;

·

actively manage the pool of assets for the benefit of note holders as well as our stockholders, customers and other stakeholders;

·

issue non‑recourse (subject to certain customary limited exceptions) debt having limited corporate covenants, including but not limited to the fact that a change in control of STORE Capital would not cause the debt to become due, which increases our corporate flexibility; and

·

issue frequent serial notes from a growing collateral pool to prudently extend, or ladder, sequential debt maturities.

To complement STORE Master Funding, we also obtain debt in discrete transactions through other bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity subsidiaries, which debt is solely secured by specific real estate assets and is generally non‑recourse to us (subject to certain customary limited exceptions). These discrete borrowings are generally in the form of traditional mortgage notes payable, with principal and interest payments due monthly and balloon payments due at their respective maturity dates, which typically range from seven to 10 years from the date of issuance. We generally obtain discrete secured borrowings from institutional commercial mortgage lenders, who subsequently securitize (that is, sell) the loans within the commercial mortgage‑backed securities, or CMBS, market. We have also occasionally used similar types of financing from insurance companies and commercial banks. Our secured borrowings contain various covenants customarily found in mortgage notes, including a limitation on the issuing entity’s ability to incur additional indebtedness on the underlying real estate. Certain of the notes also require the posting of cash reserves with the lender or trustee if specified coverage ratios are not maintained by the special purpose entity or the tenant. As of December 31, 2014, the long‑term, non‑recourse debt of our consolidated special purpose entities had an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $1.3 billion, a weighted average maturity of 6.9 years and a weighted average interest rate of 4.89%; these amounts include the impact of the 2014 issuance of $260 million in STORE Master Funding seven-year and ten-year notes at a weighted average interest rate of 4.64%.

As previously noted, a large portion of our real estate investment portfolio serves as collateral for our consolidated outstanding debt.  The following is a summary of the outstanding balance of our borrowings as well as a summary of the portion of our real estate investment portfolio that is either pledged as collateral for these borrowings or is unencumbered as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Investment Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purpose

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

Entity

 

All Other

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Borrowings

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Total

 

STORE Master Funding net‑lease mortgage notes payable

    

$

1,085 

    

$

1,527 

    

$

-

    

$

1,527 

 

Other mortgage notes payable

 

 

198 

 

 

327 

 

 

-

 

 

327 

 

Total long‑term debt

 

 

1,283 

 

 

1,854 

 

 

 

 

 

1,854 

 

Unencumbered real estate assets

 

 

 

 

684 

 

 

268 

 

 

952 

 

 

 

$

1,283 

 

$

2,538 

 

$

268 

 

$

2,806 

 

 

Our decision to use STORE Master Funding or non‑recourse traditional mortgage loan borrowings depends on borrowing costs, debt terms, debt flexibility and the tenant and industry diversification levels of the collateral pool. As we continue to acquire real estate, we expect to balance the overall degree of leverage on our portfolio by growing a pool of portfolio assets that are unencumbered. A growing pool of unencumbered assets will increase our financial flexibility in the future by providing us with assets that could support unsecured short‑term financing or that could serve as substitute collateral. As of December 31, 2014, our unencumbered assets aggregated $952 million.  Should market factors, which are beyond our control, adversely impact our access to these debt sources at economically feasible rates,

39


 

Table of Contents

our ability to grow through additional real estate acquisitions will be limited to any undistributed amounts available from our operations and any additional equity capital raises.

As shown in the table below, net cash provided by operating activities rose each year primarily due to the increase in the size of our real estate investment portfolio. Our real estate investing activities have grown in volume as we continue to make headway into our target market by identifying and acquiring real estate, primarily through sale‑leaseback transactions. Our investing activities in the table below are shown net of cash proceeds from the sales of 16 properties in 2014 aggregating $39.4 million, 17 properties in 2013 aggregating $40.7 million and seven properties in 2012 aggregating $5.3 million. Real estate investment activity was funded with a combination of cash from operations, proceeds from the issuance of debt and proceeds from the issuance of common stock. We began making distributions in 2012 and paid dividends to our stockholders totaling $5.7 million in 2012, $51.6 million in 2013 and $64.6 million in 2014.  The 2014 dividends exclude a pro-rated dividend per common share of $0.1139, or $1.00 per share on an annualized basis, for the period since the closing of the IPO through December 31, 2014. This dividend was paid in January 2015 and represents our intended annual cash dividend of $1.00 per share. Cash for the increase in dividends between years resulted primarily from the increase in cash provided by our operations. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $136.3 million, $61.8 million and $64.8 million at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

    

$

108,106 

    

$

54,934 

    

$

22,415 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(1,059,814)

 

 

(786,515)

 

 

(672,154)

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

1,026,207 

 

 

728,643 

 

 

683,288 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

74,499 

 

$

(2,938)

 

$

33,549 

 

 

Management believes that the cash generated by our operations, together with our cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2014, our current borrowing capacity on our revolving credit facility and our access to long‑term debt capital, will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future and allow us to acquire the real estate for which we currently have made commitments. In order to continue to grow our real estate portfolio in the future beyond the excess cash generated by our operations and our ability to borrow, we intend to raise additional equity capital through the sale of our common stock.

Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off‑balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2014.

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides information with respect to our contractual commitments as of December 31, 2014, including any guaranteed or minimum commitments under contractual obligations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payment Due by Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 year

 

1 ‑ 3 years

 

3 ‑ 5 years

 

5 years

 

(In thousands)

 

Total

 

(2015)

 

(2016 ‑ 2017)

 

(2018 ‑ 2019)

 

(after 2019)

 

Credit facility (1)

    

$

 

    

$

    

$

    

$

    

$

 

Non‑recourse long‑term debt obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

1,283,495 

 

 

37,901 

 

 

56,776 

 

 

261,041 

 

 

927,777 

 

Interest

 

 

397,242 

 

 

61,777 

 

 

118,612 

 

 

108,451 

 

 

108,402 

 

Commitments to customers (2)

 

 

33,940 

 

 

31,989 

 

 

1,951 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate office operating lease obligations

 

 

1,061 

 

 

290 

 

 

613 

 

 

158 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

1,715,738 

 

$

131,957 

 

$

177,952 

 

$

369,650 

 

$

1,036,179 

 

 


(1)

We had no balances outstanding on our unsecured credit facility as of December 31, 2014.    

40


 

Table of Contents

(2)

Represents our commitments to fund improvements to real estate properties previously acquired;  these construction improvement commitments are similar to property acquisitions as they will result in increases to rental revenue due under the related contracts.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the December 31, 2014 consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our historical financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements which are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although management believes its estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The accounting policies discussed below are considered critical because changes to certain judgments and assumptions inherent in these policies could affect the financial statements. For more information on our accounting policies, please refer to the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Real Estate Investments

We record the acquisition of real estate properties at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. We allocate the cost of real estate properties to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their estimated relative fair values. Real estate properties subject to an existing in‑place lease at the date of acquisition are recorded as business combinations, and each tangible and intangible asset and liability acquired is recorded at fair value. Management uses multiple sources to estimate fair value, including independent appraisals and information obtained about each property as a result of its pre‑acquisition due diligence and its marketing and leasing activities. We expense transaction costs associated with real estate acquisitions accounted for as business combinations in the period incurred. Properties classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value, less anticipated closing costs.

Lease Intangibles

In‑place lease intangibles are valued based on managements estimates of lost rent and carrying costs during the time it would take to locate a tenant if the property were vacant, considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating lost rent and carrying costs, management considers market rents, real estate taxes, insurance, costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions and other related costs. The value assigned to in‑place leases is amortized on a straight‑line basis as a component of depreciation and amortization expense typically over the remaining term of the related leases.

The fair value of any above‑market and below‑market leases is estimated based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in‑place lease and managements estimate of current market lease rates for the property, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease. Capitalized above‑market lease intangibles are amortized over the remaining term of the respective leases as a decrease to rental revenue. Below‑market lease intangibles are amortized as an increase in rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases plus the fixed‑rate renewal periods on those leases, if any. Should a lease terminate early, the unamortized portion of any related lease intangible is immediately recognized in operations.

Loans and Direct Financing Receivables

We hold our loans receivable for long‑term investment. Loans receivable are carried at amortized cost, including related unamortized discounts or premiums, if any. Certain of our real estate investment transactions are accounted for as direct financing leases. We record the direct financing receivables at their net investment, determined as the aggregate minimum lease payments and the estimated residual value of the leased property less unearned income.

41


 

Table of Contents

The unearned income is recognized over the life of the related contracts so as to produce a constant rate of return on the net investment in the asset.

Impairment

We review our real estate investments and related lease intangibles periodically for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Management considers factors such as expected future undiscounted cash flows, estimated residual value, market trends (such as the effects of leasing demand and competition) and other factors in making this assessment. An asset is considered impaired if the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted cash flows, and the impairment is calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Estimating future cash flows is highly subjective and such estimates could differ materially from actual results.

We periodically evaluate the collectibility of our loans receivable, including accrued interest, by analyzing the underlying property‑level economics and trends, collateral value and quality and other relevant factors in determining the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. A loan is determined to be impaired when, in management’s judgment based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Specific allowances for loan losses are provided for impaired loans on an individual loan basis in the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral less disposition costs.

Revenue Recognition

We lease real estate to our tenants under long‑term net leases that are predominantly classified as operating leases. Direct costs associated with lease origination, offset by any lease origination fees received, are deferred and amortized over the related lease term as an adjustment to rental revenue. Substantially all of the leases are triple‑net, which provide that the lessees are responsible for the payment of all property operating expenses, including property taxes, maintenance and insurance.

Our leases generally provide for rent escalations throughout the lease terms. For leases that provide for specific contractual escalations, rental revenue is recognized on a straight‑line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accordingly, accrued rental revenue, calculated as the aggregate difference between the rental revenue recognized on a straight‑line basis and scheduled rents, represents unbilled rent receivables that we will receive only if the tenants make all rent payments required through the expiration of the lease. We provide an estimated reserve for uncollectible straight‑line rental revenue based on managements assessment of the risks inherent in those lease contracts, giving consideration to industry default rates for long‑term receivables. Leases that have contingent rent escalators indexed to future increases in the CPI may adjust over a one‑year period or over multiple‑year periods. Generally, these escalators increase rent at the lesser of (a) 1 to 1.25 times the increase in the CPI over a specified period or (b) a fixed percentage. Because of the volatility and uncertainty with respect to future changes in the CPI, our inability to determine the extent to which any specific future change in the CPI is probable at each rent adjustment date during the entire term of these leases and our view that the multiplier does not represent a significant leverage factor, increases in rental revenue from leases with this type of escalator are recognized only after the changes in the rental rates have actually occurred. For leases that have contingent rentals that are based on a percentage of the tenants gross sales, we recognize contingent rental revenue when the threshold upon which the contingent lease payment is based is actually reached.

We suspend revenue recognition if the collectibility of amounts due pursuant to a lease is not reasonably assured or if the tenants monthly lease payments become more than 60 days past due, whichever is earlier. In the event that the collectibility of a receivable with respect to any tenant is in doubt, a provision for uncollectible amounts will be established or a direct write‑off of the specific rent receivable will be made.

We recognize interest income on loans receivable using the effective interest method applied on a loan‑by‑loan basis. Direct costs associated with originating loans are offset against any related fees received and the balance, along with any premium or discount, is deferred and amortized as an adjustment to interest income over the term of the related loan receivable using the effective interest method. A loan receivable is placed on nonaccrual status when the loan has

42


 

Table of Contents

become 60 days past due, or earlier if management determines that full recovery of the contractually specified payments of principal and interest is doubtful. While on nonaccrual status, interest income is recognized only when received.

Share‑Based Compensation

Certain of our directors, officers and key employees have been granted long‑term incentive awards, including restricted shares of our common stock and profits interests units issued by STORE Holding, which provide them with equity interests as an incentive to remain in our service and align executives interests with those of our equity holders. We estimate the fair value of restricted stock at the date of grant and recognize that amount in general and administrative expense ratably over the vesting period at the greater of the amount amortized on a straight‑line basis or the amount vested. The fair value of the restricted stock is based on the per‑share price of the common stock on the date of the grant. Prior to our IPO, the fair value was based on the per-share price of the common stock issued in our private equity offerings.

Depreciation

Our real estate portfolio is depreciated using the straight‑line method over the estimated remaining useful life of the properties, which generally ranges from 30 to 40 years for buildings and is 15 years for land improvements. Any properties classified as held for sale are not depreciated.

Income Taxes

We have made an election to qualify, and believe we are operating in a manner to continue to qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes beginning with our initial taxable year ended December 31, 2011. As a REIT, we will generally not be subject to federal income taxes to the extent that we distribute all of our taxable income to our stockholders and meet other specific requirements; however, we are still subject to certain state and local income taxes and to federal income and excise tax on our undistributed income.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We may enter into derivatives contracts as part of our overall financing strategy to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates associated with current and/or future debt issuances. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. We record our derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value as either an asset or liability. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge.

43


 

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Increase

 

(In thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

(Decrease)

 

Total revenues

    

$

190,441 

    

$

108,904 

    

$

81,537 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

67,959 

 

 

39,180 

 

 

28,779 

 

Transaction costs

 

 

2,804 

 

 

2,643 

 

 

161 

 

Property costs

 

 

473 

 

 

127 

 

 

346 

 

General and administrative

 

 

19,494 

 

 

14,132 

 

 

5,362 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

57,025 

 

 

30,349 

 

 

26,676 

 

Total expenses

 

 

147,755 

 

 

86,431 

 

 

61,324 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

42,686 

 

 

22,473 

 

 

20,213 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

180 

 

 

155 

 

 

25 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

42,506 

 

 

22,318 

 

 

20,188 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

1,140 

 

 

3,995 

 

 

(2,855)

 

Income before gain on dispositions of real estate investments

 

 

43,646 

 

 

26,313 

 

 

17,333 

 

Gain on dispositions of real estate investments

 

 

4,493 

 

 

 

 

4,493 

 

Net income

 

$

48,139 

 

$

26,313 

 

$

21,826 

 

 

Overview

As of December 31, 2014, our real estate investment portfolio had grown to $2.8 billion, consisting of investments in 947 property locations in 46 states, operated by 226 customers in various industries. Approximately 96% of the real estate investment portfolio represents commercial real estate properties subject to long‑term leases, 4% represents mortgage loan and direct financing receivables primarily on commercial real estate buildings (located on land we own and lease to our customers) and a nominal amount represents loans receivable secured by our tenants other assets. All of our owned properties were subject to a lease as of December 31, 2014.

Revenues

Revenues rose by 74.9% to $190.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $108.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, driven primarily by the growth in the size of our real estate investment portfolio, which generated additional rental revenues and interest income. Our real estate investment portfolio grew from $1.7 billion in gross investment amount at the end of 2013 to $2.8 billion in gross investment amount at December 31, 2014. Our real estate investments were made throughout the years presented and were not all outstanding for the entire period; accordingly, about half of the increase in revenues between years is related to recognizing a full year of revenue in 2014 on acquisitions that were purchased during 2013 and about half of the increase represents a partial year of revenue on assets that were acquired during 2014. The full revenue impact of 2014 acquisitions will be seen in 2015.  The weighted average real estate investment amounts outstanding during the years were $2.24 billion in 2014 and $1.28 billion in 2013.

The weighted average initial real estate capitalization rate on the properties we acquired during 2014 (calculated as the initial annualized base rent divided by the purchase price of the properties) was 8.3% as compared to 8.5%  for properties acquired during 2013.

The initial rental rates we receive on sale‑leaseback transactions on the various types of properties we target across the United States vary from transaction to transaction based on many factors, such as the terms of the lease, each propertys real estate fundamentals and the market rents in the area. The majority of our transactions are sale‑leaseback transactions where we acquire the property and simultaneously negotiate a lease with the tenant based on their business

44


 

Table of Contents

needs, whereas the properties listed in online commercial real estate marketplaces are often subject to existing leases and are offered by third‑party sellers. Since our real estate leases represent an alternative for our customers to other forms of corporate capitalization, lease rates can also be influenced by changes in interest rates and overall capital availability. In general, because we provide tailored customer lease solutions, our lease rates have been historically subject to less variance than the auction marketplace as a whole. We have seen a general decrease of approximately 0.35% between December 2013 and December 2014 in real estate capitalization rates listed in online commercial real estate marketplaces. While we have experienced less downward lease rate pressures with the investments we funded during 2014, we have seen some lease rate compression, particularly during the latter part of the year. The lower long‑term interest rate environment during 2014 contributed to this easing. The impact of the lower lease rates may be wholly or partially offset by opportunities for lower long‑term borrowing costs, although there is no assurance of this.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased to $68.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $39.2 million in 2013 due primarily to an increase in long‑term borrowings used to partially fund the acquisition of properties for our growing real estate investment portfolio. We funded the growth in our real estate investment portfolio with added equity and long‑term debt, using our short‑term credit facilities to temporarily finance properties we acquired until we had a sufficiently large and diverse pool of properties to issue long‑term fixed‑rate debt.

The following table summarizes our interest expense for the periods.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Interest expense—short‑term credit facilities (includes non‑use fees)

    

$

3,084 

    

$

3,344 

 

Interest expense—non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities

 

 

58,304 

 

 

31,650 

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs and other

 

 

6,571 

 

 

4,186 

 

Total interest expense

 

$

67,959 

 

$

39,180 

 

Short‑term credit facilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average debt outstanding

 

$

79,519 

 

$

77,315 

 

Average interest rate (includes non‑use fees)

 

 

3.9 

%  

 

4.3 

%  

Non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average debt outstanding

 

$

1,188,842 

 

$

629,181 

 

Average interest rate

 

 

4.9 

%  

 

5.0 

%  

 

The average amount of long-term debt outstanding was $1.19 billion during 2014, up significantly from $0.63 billion in 2013 which is the primary driver for the increase in interest expense on long-term debt.  This increase was slightly offset by a decrease in the weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt. During 2014, our consolidated special purpose entities issued one series of STORE Master Funding net‑lease mortgage notes payable aggregating $260 million in principal amount with a weighted average interest rate of 4.64%.   In addition, we added $52.7 million of traditional mortgage debt during 2014.  At the end of 2014, we had $1.28 billion of outstanding long term debt with a weighted average interest rate of 4.9%. The average debt outstanding on our credit facilities increased to $79.5 million in 2014 from $77.3 million in 2013. The weighted average interest rate, including non-use fees on undrawn amounts, on our short-term borrowings was 3.9% in 2014, down from 4.3% in 2013During these periods, our two main secured credit facilities bore interest at a variable rate based on one‑month LIBOR plus a credit spread of 2.45% to 3.0%.  In September 2014, we replaced these two secured credit facilities with an unsecured credit facility that bears interest based on one‑month LIBOR plus a credit spread ranging from 1.75% to 2.50% using a leverage‑based scale. The LIBOR rate has been fairly stable since the beginning of 2013, with the one‑month LIBOR rate hovering between 0.15% and 0.17% during 2014 and between 0.16% and 0.21% during 2013.   

From time to time, we may have construction activities on one or more of our real estate properties and interest capitalized as a part of those activities represented less than $1 million in 2014.  In addition, interest expense in 2014

45


 

Table of Contents

includes the write off of $1.2 million in remaining unamortized deferred financing costs related to the two secured credit facilities that we replaced with our new $300 million unsecured credit facility in September 2014.    

Transaction Costs

Our real estate acquisitions have been predominantly sale‑leaseback transactions in which acquisition and closing costs were capitalized as part of the investment in the property.  We  also occasionally acquire properties subject to an existing lease. Costs incurred on real estate transactions where we acquired properties that are subject to an existing lease were expensed to operations as incurred. Transaction costs expensed during the year ended December 31, 2014 totaled $2.8 million, as compared to $2.6 million incurred during 2013. Whether the real estate we acquire is subject to an existing lease or not determines how we account for the related transaction costs and, accordingly, may cause variability in the level of such costs expensed to operations from year to year.

Property Costs

Approximately 97% of our leases are triple-net, meaning that our tenants are generally responsible for the property-level operating costs such as taxes, insurance and maintenance. Accordingly, we  generally do not expect to incur property-level operating costs or capital expenditures, except during any period where one or more of our properties is no longer under lease. As of December 31, 2014, all of our properties are under lease and we have few near-term scheduled lease maturities, so we do not expect to incur significant property costs in the near term.  Our need to expend capital on our properties is further reduced due to the fact that some of our tenants will periodically refresh the property at their own expense to meet their business needs or in connection with franchisor requirements.

Included in property costs in 2014 and 2013 is approximately $57,000 and $30,000, respectively, related to the amortization of ground lease interest intangibles. Property costs also include the expense of performing site inspections of our properties from time to time, as well as the property management costs of the few properties we own that have specific landlord property-level expense obligations. 

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses include compensation and benefits; professional fees such as portfolio servicing, legal and accounting fees; and general office expenses such as insurance, office rent and travel costs. General and administrative costs totaled $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to  $14.1 million for 2013 primarily due to the growth of our portfolio and additions to our staff due to the growth in our operations. Expenses, such as property‑related insurance costs and the costs of servicing the properties and loans comprising our real estate portfolio, increase in direct proportion to the increase in the size of the portfolio. Other costs, including the compensation paid to our real estate acquisition personnel, are based on the volume of real estate acquisitions made during the period; these costs were higher during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 commensurate with the increase in acquisition volume. Our number of employees grew from 44 employees at the end of 2013 to 50 employees as of December 31, 2014;  the added positions expanded our portfolio management and servicing team and other operations support functions and contributed to the increase in compensation and employee benefits expense. We expect an increase of approximately $2 million per year in ongoing costs related to being a public company, including the costs of public company governance and reporting and meeting other regulatory filing requirements. We also expect that general and administrative expenses will continue to rise in some measure as our real estate investment portfolio grows; however, we expect that such expenses as a percentage of the portfolio will decrease over time due to efficiencies and economies of scale.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense generally rises in proportion to the increase in the size of our real estate portfolio and, accordingly, such expense rose from $30.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 to $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.

46


 

Table of Contents

Net Income

Our net income rose to $48.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from the $26.3 million in net income reported in 2013. The increase in net income is primarily due to the growth in the size of our real estate investment portfolio, which generated additional rental revenues and interest income.  A portion of the increase in net income relates to an increase in gains from the sale of properties. We sell properties from time to time in order to enhance the diversity and quality of our real estate portfolio. We reported gains aggregating $5.5 million on the sale of 16 properties during the year ended December 31, 2014. The cost of the properties sold during 2014 represented 2% of our total real estate investment portfolio at the beginning of the year. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we reported gains aggregating $2.2 million (net of tax) on the sale of 17 properties; the cost of these properties represented 4% of our real estate investment portfolio at the beginning of that year.  As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2014‑08 effective as of the beginning of 2014. As a result of this new accounting guidance, during 2014, the gains on the sales of the three properties that were considered to be held for sale as of the end of 2013 are reported in income from discontinued operations and the remaining gains are reported separately below income from continuing operations. During the year ended December 31, 2013, all gains on sales of properties were reported, net of tax, in income from discontinued operations.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Increase

 

(In thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

(Decrease)

 

Total revenues

    

$

108,904 

    

$

40,610 

    

$

68,294 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

39,180 

 

 

11,472 

 

 

27,708 

 

Transaction costs

 

 

2,643 

 

 

387 

 

 

2,256 

 

Property costs

 

 

127 

 

 

 

 

120 

 

General and administrative

 

 

14,132 

 

 

10,362 

 

 

3,770 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

30,349 

 

 

11,015 

 

 

19,334 

 

Total expenses

 

 

86,431 

 

 

33,243 

 

 

53,188 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

22,473 

 

 

7,367 

 

 

15,106 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

155 

 

 

70 

 

 

85 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

22,318 

 

 

7,297 

 

 

15,021 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

3,995 

 

 

879 

 

 

3,116 

 

Net income

 

$

26,313 

 

$

8,176 

 

$

18,137 

 

 

Overview

As of December 31, 2013, our real estate investment portfolio totaled $1.7 billion, consisting of investments in 622 property locations in 42 states, operated by 148 customers in various industries. Approximately 96% of the real estate investment portfolio represented commercial real estate properties subject to long‑term leases, 4% represented mortgage loans receivable on commercial real estate buildings (located on land we owned and leased to our customers) and a nominal amount represented loans receivable secured by our tenants inventory or other assets. All of our owned properties were subject to a lease as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Revenues

Revenues rose by 168% to $108.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $40.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, driven primarily by the growth in the size of our real estate investment portfolio, which generated additional rental revenues and interest income. Our real estate investment portfolio grew from $911.7 million in gross investment amount representing 371 properties at December 31, 2012 to $1.7 billion in gross investment amount representing 622 properties at December 31, 2013. The $837 million we invested in portfolio assets during 2013 represented 268 properties operated by 94 customers in 33 industries in 39 states. Our real estate investments were made throughout the years presented and were not all outstanding for the entire periodThe weighted average real estate investment amounts outstanding during the years were $1.28 billion in 2013 and $486.2 million in 2012. The weighted average initial real estate capitalization rate on the properties we acquired in 2013 (calculated as the initial annualized base rent divided by the purchase price of the properties) was 8.5%  for 2013 as compared to 8.7% for 2012.

47


 

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

The following table summarizes our interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year

 

 

 

Ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Interest expense—secured credit facilities (includes non‑use fees)

    

$

3,262 

    

$

2,393 

 

Interest expense—unsecured credit facility

 

 

82 

 

 

144 

 

Interest expense—non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities

 

 

31,650 

 

 

6,834 

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs and other

 

 

4,186 

 

 

2,101 

 

Total interest expense

 

$

39,180 

 

$

11,472 

 

Secured short‑term credit facilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average debt outstanding

 

$

74,877 

 

$

54,814 

 

Average interest rate (includes non‑use fees)

 

 

4.36 

%  

 

4.37 

%  

Non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average debt outstanding

 

$

629,181 

 

$

122,813 

 

Average interest rate

 

 

5.03 

%  

 

5.56 

%  

 

Interest expense increased to $39.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $11.5 million in 2012 due primarily to an increase in short‑term and long‑term borrowings used to partially fund the acquisition of properties for our growing real estate investment portfolio. We funded the growth in our real estate investment portfolio with added equity and long‑term debt, using our short‑term credit facilities to temporarily finance properties we acquired until we had a sufficiently large and diverse pool of properties to issue long‑term fixed‑rate debt. The average debt outstanding on our secured credit facilities increased from $54.8 million in 2012 to $74.9 million in 2013 at a weighted average interest rate of 3.18% in 2012 as compared to 3.13% in 2013. During these periods, our secured credit facilities bore interest at a variable rate based on one‑month LIBOR plus a credit spread of 2.45% to 3.0%. The LIBOR rate was fairly stable during 2012 and 2013 at less than 0.3%. In addition to the interest, we paid a non‑use fee on undrawn amounts. During 2013, our consolidated special purpose entities issued a total of three series of STORE Master Funding net‑lease mortgage notes payable aggregating $633 million in principal amount. In addition, we added $61.6 million of traditional mortgage debt during the year, bringing our long‑term debt outstanding to $991.4 million at December 31, 2013, up from $306.6 million at December 31, 2012. The interest rates achieved on the debt added during 2013, primarily consisting of the Master Funding notes issued throughout the year, resulted in a decrease in the weighted average cost of our long-term debt.

Transaction Costs

Transaction costs expensed during the year ended December 31, 2013 totaled $2.6 million and were higher than the $0.4 million incurred during the comparable period of 2012, because we had a higher volume of transactions subject to existing leases in 2013. Whether the real estate we acquire is subject to an existing lease or not determines how we account for the related transaction costs and, accordingly, may cause variability in the level of such costs expensed to operations from year to year.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative costs totaled $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to $10.4 million for 2012 primarily due to the growth of our portfolio and additions to our staff due to the growth in our operations. Expenses, such as property‑related insurance costs and the costs of servicing the properties and loans comprising our real estate portfolio, increased in direct proportion to the increase in the size of the portfolio. Other costs, including the compensation paid to our real estate acquisition personnel, were based on the volume of real estate acquisitions made during the period; these costs were higher in 2013 than in 2012 because our acquisition volume was

48


 

Table of Contents

higher in 2013. We hired eight employees in 2013 to expand our primary internal operating functions, increasing compensation and employee benefits expense.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased in proportion to the increase in the size of the real estate portfolio and, accordingly, such expense rose from $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $30.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Net Income

Our net income rose to $26.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the $8.2 million in net income reported in 2012. The increase in net income is primarily due to the growth in the size of our real estate investment portfolio, which generated additional rental revenues and interest income. In addition, we reported an aggregate gain of $2.2 million (net of taxes) on the sale of 17 properties during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to an aggregate gain of $0.2 million on the sale of seven properties during 2012. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, gains and losses on the sales of properties were reported, net of tax, in income from discontinued operations.

Non-GAAP Measures

Our reported results are presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. We also disclose Funds from Operations, or FFO, and Adjusted Funds from Operations, or AFFO, both of which are non‑GAAP measures. We believe these two non‑GAAP financial measures are useful to investors because they are widely accepted industry measures used by analysts and investors to compare the operating performance of REITs. FFO and AFFO do not represent cash generated from operating activities and are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash requirements; accordingly, they should not be considered alternatives to net income as a performance measure or cash flows from operations as reported on our statement of cash flows as a liquidity measure and should be considered in addition to, and not in lieu of, GAAP financial measures.

We compute FFO in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT. NAREIT defines FFO as GAAP net income, excluding gains (or losses) from extraordinary items and sales of depreciable property, real estate impairment losses and depreciation and amortization expense from real estate assets, including the pro rata share of such adjustments of unconsolidated subsidiaries. To derive AFFO, we modify the NAREIT computation of FFO to include other adjustments to GAAP net income related to non‑cash revenues and expenses such as straight‑line rents, amortization of deferred financing costs and stock‑based compensation. In addition, in deriving AFFO, we exclude transaction costs associated with acquiring real estate subject to existing leases.

FFO is used by management, investors and analysts to facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers primarily because it excludes the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization and net gains on sales, which are based on historical costs and implicitly assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time, rather than fluctuating based on existing market conditions. Management believes that AFFO provides more useful information to investors and analysts because it modifies FFO to exclude additional non-cash revenues and expenses such as straight‑line rents, amortization of deferred financing costs and stock‑based compensation as such items may cause short-term fluctuations in net income but have no impact on operating cash flows or long-term operating performance. Additionally, in deriving AFFO, we exclude transaction costs associated with acquiring real estate subject to existing leases. We view transaction costs to be a part of our investment in the real estate we acquire, similar to the treatment of acquisition and closing costs on our sale-leaseback transactions, which are capitalized as a part of the investment in the asset. We believe that transaction costs are not an ongoing cost of the portfolio in place at the end of each reporting period and, for these reasons, we add back the portion expensed when computing AFFO.  As a result, we believe AFFO to be a more meaningful measurement of ongoing performance that allows for greater performance comparability.  Therefore, we disclose both FFO and AFFO and reconcile them to the most appropriate GAAP performance metric, which is net income.  STORE Capital’s FFO and AFFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.

49


 

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of net income (which we believe is the most comparable GAAP measure) to FFO and AFFO.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income

    

$

48,139 

    

$

26,313 

    

$

8,176 

 

Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

56,722 

 

 

30,117 

 

 

10,871 

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

575 

 

 

147 

 

Gain on dispositions of real estate, net of tax

 

 

(5,478)

 

 

(2,162)

 

 

(180)

 

Funds from Operations

 

 

99,383 

 

 

54,843 

 

 

19,014 

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Straight‑line rental revenue, net

 

 

(2,402)

 

 

(1,421)

 

 

(218)

 

Transaction costs

 

 

2,804 

 

 

2,643 

 

 

387 

 

Non‑cash equity‑based compensation

 

 

2,294 

 

 

1,228 

 

 

356 

 

Non‑cash interest expense

 

 

7,146 

 

 

4,186 

 

 

2,100 

 

Amortization of lease‑related intangibles and costs

 

 

651 

 

 

260 

 

 

62 

 

Adjusted Funds from Operations

 

$

109,876 

 

$

61,739 

 

$

21,701 

 

 

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of future interest rate changes on our earnings and cash flows. We seek to match the cash inflows from our long‑term leases with the expected cash outflows on our long‑term debt. To achieve this objective, our consolidated subsidiaries primarily borrow on a fixed‑rate basis for longer‑term debt issuances. At December 31, 2014, substantially all of our outstanding long‑term debt carried a fixed interest rate and the weighted average debt maturity was approximately seven years. We are exposed to interest rate risk between the time we enter into a sale‑leaseback transaction and the time we finance the related real estate with long‑term fixed‑rate debt. In addition, when that long‑term debt matures, we may have to refinance the real estate at a higher interest rate. Market interest rates are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control.  

We address interest rate risk by employing the following strategies to help insulate us from any adverse impact of rising interest rates:

·

We seek to minimize the time period between acquisition of our real estate and the ultimate financing of that real estate with long‑term fixed‑rate debt.

·

By using serial issuances of long-term debt, we intend to ladder out our debt maturities to avoid a significant amount of debt maturing during any single period.

·

We choose long‑term debt that generally provides for some amortization of the principal balance over the term of the debt, which serves to reduce the amount of refinancing risk at debt maturity to the extent that we can refinance the reduced debt balance over a revised long-term amortization schedule.   

·

We strive to grow our free cash flow such that, over time, our cash flow from operating activities, after principal payments on our debt, plus cash flows from property sales and principal collected on our loans receivable, each year exceeds that year’s scheduled debt maturities.

Although the substantial majority of our debt is fixed-rate debt, we utilize credit facilities that are based on a variable rate.  During the year ended December 31, 2014, we had average daily outstanding borrowings of $79.5 million on our variable‑rate credit facilities at a weighted average annual interest rate of one‑month LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.0%.  We monitor our market interest rate risk exposures using a sensitivity analysis.  Our sensitivity analysis estimates the exposure to market risk sensitive instruments assuming a hypothetical adverse change in interest rates.  Based on the results of a sensitivity analysis, which assumes a 1% adverse change in interest rates, the estimated market risk exposure for all of our variable‑rate debt was approximately $849,000, or less than 1% of net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2014. In addition, we may use various financial instruments designed to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our cash flows and earnings, including hedging strategies, depending on our analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies.  We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.  See Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on derivatives.

50


 

Table of Contents

Item 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

STORE Capital Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of STORE Capital Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of STORE Capital Corporation at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for reporting discontinued operations effective January 1, 2014.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

March 10, 2015

51


 

Table of Contents

STORE Capital Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Assets

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land and improvements

 

$

843,843 

 

$

562,085 

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

1,790,530 

 

 

1,042,244 

 

Intangible lease assets

 

 

60,184 

 

 

29,917 

 

Total real estate investments

 

 

2,694,557 

 

 

1,634,246 

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(98,671)

 

 

(41,976)

 

 

 

 

2,595,886 

 

 

1,592,270 

 

Real estate investments held for sale, net

 

 

 

 

9,023 

 

Loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

111,354 

 

 

66,917 

 

Net investments

 

 

2,707,240 

 

 

1,668,210 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

136,313 

 

 

61,814 

 

Restricted cash and other assets

 

 

32,923 

 

 

24,556 

 

Deferred costs, net

 

 

37,136 

 

 

31,520 

 

Total assets

 

$

2,913,612 

 

$

1,786,100 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit facilities

 

$

 —

 

$

 

Non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities, net

 

 

1,284,151 

 

 

991,577 

 

Dividends payable

 

 

13,123 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

30,486 

 

 

13,263 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

3,168 

 

 

7,346 

 

Total liabilities

 

 

1,330,928 

 

 

1,012,186 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 125,000,000 shares authorized; no shares and 125 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 375,000,000 shares authorized; 115,212,541 and 62,966,920 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

1,152 

 

 

630 

 

Capital in excess of par value

 

 

1,636,203 

 

 

798,228 

 

Distributions in excess of retained earnings

 

 

(54,405)

 

 

(24,816)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(266)

 

 

(128)

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

1,582,684 

 

 

773,914 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

2,913,612 

 

$

1,786,100 

 

 

See accompanying notes.

52


 

Table of Contents

STORE Capital Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2014

    

2013

    

2012

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental revenues

 

$

181,972 

 

$

103,398 

 

$

38,752 

 

Interest income on loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

8,069 

 

 

5,044 

 

 

1,843 

 

Other income

 

 

400 

 

 

462 

 

 

15 

 

Total revenues

 

 

190,441 

 

 

108,904 

 

 

40,610 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

67,959 

 

 

39,180 

 

 

11,472 

 

Transaction costs

 

 

2,804 

 

 

2,643 

 

 

387 

 

Property costs

 

 

473 

 

 

127 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

19,494 

 

 

14,132 

 

 

10,362 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

57,025 

 

 

30,349 

 

 

11,015 

 

Total expenses

 

 

147,755 

 

 

86,431 

 

 

33,243 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

42,686 

 

 

22,473 

 

 

7,367 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

180 

 

 

155 

 

 

70 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

42,506 

 

 

22,318 

 

 

7,297 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

1,140 

 

 

3,995 

 

 

879 

 

Income before gain on dispositions of real estate investments

 

 

43,646 

 

 

26,313 

 

 

8,176 

 

Gain on dispositions of real estate investments

 

 

4,493 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

48,139 

 

$

26,313 

 

$

8,176 

 

Net income per share of common stock—basic and diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.59 

 

$

0.44 

 

$

0.26 

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.01 

 

 

0.08 

 

 

0.03 

 

Net income

 

$

0.61 

 

$

0.52 

 

$

0.30 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

78,454,599 

 

 

49,893,667 

 

 

27,338,052 

 

Diluted

 

 

78,454,599 

 

 

49,893,667 

 

 

27,338,052 

 

 

See accompanying notes.

53


 

Table of Contents

STORE Capital Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income

    

$

48,139 

    

$

26,313 

    

$

8,176 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in unrealized losses on cash flow hedges

 

 

(457)

 

 

414 

 

 

(911)

 

Cash flow hedge losses reclassified to operations

 

 

319 

 

 

319 

 

 

306 

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(138)

 

 

733 

 

 

(605)

 

Total comprehensive income

 

$

48,001 

 

$

27,046 

 

$

7,571 

 

 

See accompanying notes.

54


 

Table of Contents

STORE Capital Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

(In thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital in

 

in Excess of

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Preferred Stock

 

Common Stock

 

Excess of

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

Par Value

 

Shares

 

Par Value

 

Par Value

 

Earnings

 

Loss

 

Equity

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

    

    

$

    

18,703,165 

    

$

187 

    

$

223,053 

    

$

(2,022)

    

$

(256)

    

$

220,962 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,176 

 

 

 

 

8,176 

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(605)

 

 

(605)

 

Issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

23,398,812 

 

 

234 

 

 

279,991 

 

 

 

 

 

 

280,225 

 

Issuance of preferred stock, net of costs of $45

 

125 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80 

 

Share‑based compensation

 

 

 

 

145,776 

 

 

 

 

338 

 

 

 

 

 

 

340 

 

Common dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12,248)

 

 

 

 

(12,248)

 

Preferred dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16)

 

 

 

 

(16)

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

125 

 

 

 

42,247,753 

 

 

423 

 

 

503,462 

 

 

(6,110)

 

 

(861)

 

 

496,914 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,313 

 

 

 

 

26,313 

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

733 

 

 

733 

 

Issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

20,492,291 

 

 

205 

 

 

293,545 

 

 

 

 

 

 

293,750 

 

Share‑based compensation

 

 

 

 

226,876 

 

 

 

 

1,221 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,223 

 

Common dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(45,003)

 

 

 

 

(45,003)

 

Preferred dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16)

 

 

 

 

(16)

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

125 

 

 

 

62,966,920 

 

 

630 

 

 

798,228 

 

 

(24,816)

 

 

(128)

 

 

773,914 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48,139 

 

 

 

 

48,139 

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(138)

 

 

(138)

 

Issuance of common stock, net of costs of $39,217

 

 

 

 

51,832,758 

 

 

518 

 

 

835,738 

 

 

 

 

 

 

836,256 

 

Share‑based compensation

 

 

 

 

412,863 

 

 

 

 

2,317 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,323 

 

Redemption of preferred stock

 

(125)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(80)

 

 

(45)

 

 

 

 

(125)

 

Common dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(77,671)

 

 

 

 

(77,671)

 

Preferred dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14)

 

 

 

 

(14)

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

 

$

 

115,212,541 

 

$

1,152 

 

$

1,636,203 

 

$

(54,405)

 

$

(266)

 

$

1,582,684 

 

 

See accompanying notes.

55


 

Table of Contents

STORE Capital Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Operating activities

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Net income

 

$

48,139 

 

$

26,313 

 

$

8,176 

 

Adjustments to net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

57,025 

 

 

30,924 

 

 

11,163 

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

7,497 

 

 

4,195 

 

 

2,113 

 

Amortization of debt (premiums) and discounts, net

 

 

(351)

 

 

(9)

 

 

(13)

 

Amortization of share‑based compensation

 

 

2,294 

 

 

1,228 

 

 

356 

 

Gain on sale of real estate

 

 

(5,478)

 

 

(3,147)

 

 

(180)

 

Noncash revenue and other

 

 

(1,113)

 

 

(1,162)

 

 

(156)

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted cash and other assets

 

 

2,656 

 

 

(14,333)

 

 

(2,497)

 

Deferred costs

 

 

(1,551)

 

 

(1,313)

 

 

(863)

 

Accounts payable and other liabilities

 

 

(1,012)

 

 

12,238 

 

 

4,316 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

108,106 

 

 

54,934 

 

 

22,415 

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of and additions to real estate

 

 

(1,044,339)

 

 

(788,462)

 

 

(640,869)

 

Investment in loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

(52,636)

 

 

(33,647)

 

 

(36,577)

 

Collections of principal on loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

6,206 

 

 

238 

 

 

73 

 

Proceeds from disposition of real estate

 

 

39,352 

 

 

40,661 

 

 

5,308 

 

Transfers to restricted deposits

 

 

(8,397)

 

 

(5,305)

 

 

(89)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(1,059,814)

 

 

(786,515)

 

 

(672,154)

 

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Borrowings under credit facilities

 

 

590,080 

 

 

359,500 

 

 

329,123 

 

Repayments under credit facilities

 

 

(590,080)

 

 

(520,162)

 

 

(198,432)

 

Borrowings under non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities

 

 

286,089 

 

 

679,848 

 

 

291,087 

 

Repayments under non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities

 

 

(20,621)

 

 

(9,755)

 

 

(1,704)

 

Financing costs paid

 

 

(11,624)

 

 

(22,942)

 

 

(11,407)

 

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

 

 

875,476 

 

 

293,751 

 

 

280,226 

 

Proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

125 

 

Dividends paid to common and preferred stockholders

 

 

(64,562)

 

 

(51,597)

 

 

(5,685)

 

Redemption of preferred stock

 

 

(125)

 

 

 

 

 

Offering costs paid

 

 

(38,426)

 

 

 

 

(45)

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

1,026,207 

 

 

728,643 

 

 

683,288 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

74,499 

 

 

(2,938)

 

 

33,549 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

61,814 

 

 

64,752 

 

 

31,203 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

136,313 

 

$

61,814 

 

$

64,752 

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

56


 

Table of Contents

STORE Capital Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

1. Organization and Formation Activities

STORE Capital Corporation (STORE Capital or the Company) was formed in Maryland on May 17, 2011 to acquire single‑tenant operational real estate to be leased on a long‑term, net basis to companies that operate across a wide variety of industries within the service, retail and industrial sectors of the United States economy. The Company may also provide mortgage financing to its customers from time to time.  

On November 21, 2014, the Company completed the initial public offering (IPO) of its common stock.  The shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 18, 2014 under the ticker symbol “STOR”.  The Company was originally formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of STORE Holding Company, LLC (STORE Holding), a Delaware limited liability company. At December 31, 2014, there were 115,212,541 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding, of which 82,802,026 shares were still held by STORE Holding, representing a 71.87% ownership of the Company. STORE Holding is primarily owned by entities managed by a global investment management firm and certain members of the Company’s senior management own 0.79% of STORE Holding.

STORE Capital has made an election to qualify, and believes it is operating in a manner to continue to qualify, as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes beginning with its initial taxable year ended December 31, 2011. As a REIT, it will generally not be subject to federal income taxes to the extent that it distributes all of its taxable income to its stockholders and meets other specific requirements.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Principles

Basis of Accounting and Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). These consolidated statements include the accounts of STORE Capital Corporation and its subsidiaries which are wholly‑owned and controlled by the Company through its voting interest. One of the Companys wholly‑owned subsidiaries, STORE Capital Advisors, LLC, provides all of the general and administrative services for the day‑to‑day operations of the consolidated group, including property acquisition and lease origination, real estate portfolio management and marketing, accounting and treasury services. The remaining subsidiaries were formed to acquire and hold real estate investments or to facilitate non‑recourse secured borrowing activities. Generally, the initial operations of the real estate subsidiaries are funded by an interest‑bearing intercompany loan from STORE Capital Corporation, and such intercompany loan is repaid when the subsidiary issues long‑term debt secured by its properties. All intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain of the Companys wholly‑owned consolidated subsidiaries were formed as special purpose entities. Each special purpose entity is a separate legal entity and is the sole owner of its assets and liabilities. The assets of the special purpose entities are not available to pay or otherwise satisfy obligations to the creditors of any owner or affiliate of the special purpose entity. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, assets totaling $2.5 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, were held and third‑party liabilities totaling $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, were owed by these special purpose entities and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although management believes its estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from those estimates.

57


 

Table of Contents

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to the current period presentation.

Segment Reporting

The Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 280, Segment Reporting, established standards for the manner in which enterprises report information about operating segments. The Company views its operations as one reportable segment.

Accounting for Real Estate Investments

STORE Capital records the acquisition of real estate properties at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The Company allocates the cost of real estate properties to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their estimated relative fair values. Real estate properties subject to an existing in‑place lease at the date of acquisition are recorded as business combinations and each tangible and intangible asset and liability acquired is recorded at fair value. Management uses multiple sources to estimate fair value, including independent appraisals and information obtained about each property as a result of its pre‑acquisition due diligence and its marketing and leasing activities.  The Company expenses transaction costs associated with real estate acquisitions accounted for as business combinations in the period incurred.  

In‑place lease intangibles are valued based on managements estimates of lost rent and carrying costs during the time it would take to locate a tenant if the property were vacant, considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating lost rent and carrying costs, management considers market rents, real estate taxes, insurance, costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions and other related costs. The value assigned to in‑place leases is amortized on a straight‑line basis as a component of depreciation and amortization expense typically over the remaining term of the related leases.

The fair value of any above‑market and below‑market leases is estimated based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in‑place lease and managements estimate of current market lease rates for the property, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease. Capitalized above‑market lease intangibles are amortized over the remaining term of the respective leases as a decrease to rental revenue. Below‑market lease intangibles are amortized as an increase in rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases plus the fixed‑rate renewal periods on those leases, if any. Should a lease terminate early, the unamortized portion of any related lease intangible is immediately recognized in operations.

The Companys real estate portfolio is depreciated using the straight‑line method over the estimated remaining useful life of the properties, which generally ranges from 30 to 40 years for buildings and is 15 years for land improvements. Properties classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying value or their fair value, less anticipated closing costs. Any properties classified as held for sale are not depreciated.

Impairment

STORE Capital reviews its real estate investments and related lease intangibles periodically for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Management considers factors such as expected future undiscounted cash flows, estimated residual value, market trends (such as the effects of leasing demand and competition) and other factors in making this assessment. An asset is considered impaired if the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted cash flows and the impairment is calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Estimating future cash flows is highly subjective and such estimates could differ materially from actual results. No impairment charges were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 or 2012.

Revenue Recognition

STORE Capital leases real estate to its tenants under long‑term net leases that are predominantly classified as operating leases. Direct costs associated with lease origination, offset by any lease origination fees received, are deferred

58


 

Table of Contents

and amortized over the related lease term as an adjustment to rental revenue. Substantially all of the leases are triple‑net, which provide that the lessees are responsible for the payment of all property operating expenses, including property taxes, maintenance and insurance. The Company may collect property taxes from its customers and remit those taxes to governmental authorities; such property taxes are presented on a net basis in the consolidated income statements.

The Companys leases generally provide for rent escalations throughout the lease terms. For leases that provide for specific contractual escalations, rental revenue is recognized on a straight‑line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accordingly, accrued rental revenue, calculated as the aggregate difference between the rental revenue recognized on a straight‑line basis and scheduled rents, represents unbilled rent receivables that the Company will receive only if the tenants make all rent payments required through the expiration of the lease. The Company provides an estimated reserve for uncollectible straight‑line rental revenue based on managements assessment of the risks inherent in those lease contracts, giving consideration to industry default rates for long‑term receivables. There was $4.7 million and $1.5 million of accrued straight‑line rental revenue, net of allowances of $1.7 million and $0.5 million, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Leases that have contingent rent escalators indexed to future increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) may adjust over a one‑year period or over multiple‑year periods. Generally, these escalators increase rent at the lesser of (a) 1 to 1.25 times the increase in the CPI over a specified period or (b) a fixed percentage. Because of the volatility and uncertainty with respect to future changes in the CPI, the Companys inability to determine the extent to which any specific future change in the CPI is probable at each rent adjustment date during the entire term of these leases and the Companys view that the multiplier does not represent a significant leverage factor, increases in rental revenue from leases with this type of escalator are recognized only after the changes in the rental rates have actually occurred.

For leases that have contingent rentals that are based on a percentage of the tenants gross sales, the Company recognizes contingent rental revenue when the threshold upon which the contingent lease payment is based is actually reached. Less than 1.5% of the Companys investment portfolio is subject to leases that provide for contingent rent based on a percentage of the tenants gross sales.

The Company suspends revenue recognition if the collectibility of amounts due pursuant to a lease is not reasonably assured or if the tenants monthly lease payments become more than 60 days past due, whichever is earlier. The Company reviews its rent receivables for collectibility on a regular basis, taking into consideration changes in factors such as the tenants payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area where the property is located. In the event that the collectibility of a receivable with respect to any tenant is in doubt, a provision for uncollectible amounts will be established or a direct write‑off of the specific rent receivable will be made. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no provision for uncollectible contractual rent payments due from tenants.

Loans Receivable

STORE Capital holds its loans receivable for long‑term investment. Loans receivable are carried at amortized cost, including related unamortized discounts or premiums, if any.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes interest income on loans receivable using the effective-interest method applied on a loan‑by‑loan basis. Direct costs associated with originating loans are offset against any related fees received and the balance, along with any premium or discount, is deferred and amortized as an adjustment to interest income over the term of the related loan receivable using the effective interest method. A loan receivable is placed on nonaccrual status when the loan has become 60 days past due, or earlier if management determines that full recovery of the contractually specified payments of principal and interest is doubtful. While on nonaccrual status, interest income is recognized only when received. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no loans on nonaccrual status.

Impairment and Provision for Loan Losses

The Company periodically evaluates the collectibility of its loans receivable, including accrued interest, by analyzing the underlying property‑level economics and trends, collateral value and quality and other relevant factors in

59


 

Table of Contents

determining the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses. A loan is determined to be impaired when, in managements judgment based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Specific allowances for loan losses are provided for impaired loans on an individual loan basis in the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral less disposition costs. There was no allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Direct Financing Receivables

Certain of the Companys real estate investment transactions are accounted for as direct financing leases. The Company records the direct financing receivables at their net investment, determined as the aggregate minimum lease payments and the estimated residual value of the leased property less unearned income. The unearned income is recognized over the life of the related contracts so as to produce a constant rate of return on the net investment in the asset.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid investment securities with maturities at acquisition of three months or less. The Company invests cash primarily in money‑market funds of a major financial institution, consisting predominantly of U.S. Government obligations.

Restricted Cash and Escrow Deposits

The Company had $15.4 million and $12.5 million of restricted cash and deposits in escrow at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Deferred Costs

Deferred costs consist principally of financing costs related to the issuance of the Companys debt. Deferred financing costs are amortized as an increase to interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument using the effective interest method. Deferred costs also include lease origination costs, which are amortized as a decrease to rental revenue over the term of the respective lease.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company may enter into derivatives contracts as part of its overall financing strategy to manage the Companys exposure to changes in interest rates associated with current and/or future debt issuances. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. The Company records its derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value as either an asset or liability. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge.

Share‑based Compensation

Certain directors and employees of the Company have been granted long‑term incentive awards, including restricted shares of the Companys common stock and profits interests units issued by STORE Holding, which provide them with equity interests as an incentive to remain in the Companys service and align executives interests with those of the Companys equity holders.

The Company estimates the fair value of restricted stock at the date of grant and recognizes that amount in general and administrative expense ratably over the vesting period at the greater of the amount amortized on a straight‑line basis or the amount vested. The fair value of the restricted stock is based on the per‑share price of the common stock on the date of the grant. Prior to the Company’s IPO, the fair value was based on the per-share price of the common stock issued in the Company’s private equity offerings. 

60


 

Table of Contents

Income Taxes

As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax; however, it is still subject to state and local income taxes and to federal income and excise tax on its undistributed income. STORE Investment Corporation is the Companys wholly‑owned taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS) created to engage in non‑qualifying REIT activities. The TRS is subject to federal, state and local income taxes.

Net Income Per Common Share

Net income per common share has been computed pursuant to the guidance in the FASB ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share. The guidance requires the classification of the shares of the Company’s unvested restricted stock, which contain rights to receive non‑forfeitable dividends, as participating securities requiring the two‑class method of computing net income per common share. The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Numerator:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Net income

 

$

48,139 

 

$

26,313 

 

$

8,176 

 

Less: preferred stock dividends

 

 

(59)

 

 

(16)

 

 

(16)

 

Net income attributable to common stockholders

 

 

48,080 

 

 

26,297 

 

 

8,160 

 

Less: earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares

 

 

(500)

 

 

(294)

 

 

(46)

 

Net income used in basic and diluted income per share

 

$

47,580 

 

$

26,003 

 

$

8,114 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

78,924,475 

 

 

50,216,017 

 

 

27,412,533 

 

Less: Weighted average number of shares of unvested restricted stock

 

 

(469,876)

 

 

(322,350)

 

 

(74,481)

 

Weighted average shares outstanding used in basic income per share

 

 

78,454,599 

 

 

49,893,667 

 

 

27,338,052 

 

Effects of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add: Treasury stock method impact of unvested restricted shares (a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding used in diluted income per share

 

 

78,454,599 

 

 

49,893,667 

 

 

27,338,052 

 

 


(a)

For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 excludes 89,625 shares, 43,654 shares and 9,218 shares, respectively, as the effect would have been antidilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company adopts the new pronouncements as of the specified effective date. When permitted, the Company may elect to early adopt the new pronouncements. Unless otherwise discussed, these new accounting pronouncements include technical corrections to existing guidance or introduce new guidance related to specialized industries or entities and therefore will have minimal, if any, impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014‑08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (ASU 2014‑08). This new guidance changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under the new guidance, only dispositions that represent a strategic shift in operations and have a major effect on the organizations operations and financial results would be presented as discontinued operations. The new standard is effective, on a prospective basis, for all disposals or classifications as held for sale of components of an entity that occur within interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals or classifications as held for sale that have not

61


 

Table of Contents

been reported in financial statements previously issued. The Company has chosen to early adopt ASU 2014‑08 effective January 1, 2014 and has applied the provisions prospectively. As a result of the adoption of this new guidance, the Company no longer presents the operating results of sold properties, which do not represent a strategic shift in operations, as part of discontinued operations on the statement of income. In implementing this guidance, the results of operations from properties sold or considered to be held for sale prior to adoption are still reported as part of discontinued operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014‑09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606. This new guidance establishes a principles‑based approach for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. Lease contracts covered by Topic 840, Leases, are excluded from the scope of this new guidance. This new standard is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued and provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements. Certain disclosures will be required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. This new standard is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and the Company does not expect that it will have an impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

3. Investments

At December 31, 2014, STORE Capital had investments in 947 property locations representing 937 owned properties  (of which 11 are accounted for as direct financing receivables), six ground lease interests and four properties which secure mortgage loans. The gross acquisition cost of the real estate investments totaled $2.7 billion at December 31, 2014. In addition, the Company held loans and direct financing receivables with an aggregate carrying amount at December 31, 2014 of $111 million, for an aggregate portfolio totaling $2.8 billion in gross investment. A substantial portion of these investments are assets of consolidated special purpose entity subsidiaries and are pledged as collateral under the non‑recourse obligations of these special purpose entities (Note 4).

62


 

Table of Contents

During 2012, 2013 and 2014, the Company had the following gross real estate and loan activity (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number of

    

Dollar

 

 

 

Investment

 

Amount of

 

 

 

Locations

 

Investments (a)

 

Gross investments, December 31, 2011

 

112 

 

$

235,778 

 

Acquisition of and additions to real estate

 

265 

 

 

644,580 

 

Investment in loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

 

36,577 

 

Sales of real estate (Note 9)

 

(7)

 

 

(5,148)

 

Principal collections on loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

 

 

(73)

 

Other

 

 

 

 

(10)

 

Gross investments, December 31, 2012

 

371 

 

 

911,704 

 

Acquisition of and additions to real estate (b)

 

267 

 

 

811,248 

 

Investment in loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

 

33,647 

 

Sales of real estate (Note 9)

 

(17)

 

 

(37,867)

 

Principal collections on loans and direct financing receivables (b)

 

(1)

 

 

(8,113)

 

Other

 

 

 

 

(67)

 

Gross investments, December 31, 2013

 

622 

 

 

1,710,552 

 

Acquisition of and additions to real estate (c)(d)

 

328 

 

 

1,085,816 

 

Investment in loans and direct financing receivables

 

15 

 

 

52,636 

 

Sales of real estate (Note 9)

 

(16)

 

 

(34,768)

 

Principal collections on loans and direct financing receivables (c)

 

(2)

 

 

(8,145)

 

Other

 

 

 

 

(180)

 

Gross investments, December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

2,805,911 

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

(98,671)

 

Net investments, December 31, 2014

 

947 

 

$

2,707,240 

 

 


(a)

The dollar amount of investments includes the investment in land, buildings, improvements and lease intangibles related to real estate investments as well as the carrying amount of the loans and direct financing receivables.

(b)

One loan receivable was repaid in full through a $7.9 million non‑cash transaction in which the Company acquired the underlying mortgaged property and leased it back to the borrower.

(c)

One mortgage loan receivable was repaid in full through a $1.9 million non‑cash transaction in which the Company acquired the two underlying mortgaged properties and leased them back to the borrower.

(d)

Includes $0.6 million of interest capitalized to properties under construction.

63


 

Table of Contents

The following table shows information regarding the diversification of the Companys total investment portfolio among the different industries in which its tenants and borrowers operate as of December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Percentage of

 

 

 

Number of

 

Dollar

 

Total Dollar

 

 

 

Investment

 

Amount of

 

Amount of

 

 

 

Locations

 

Investments (a)

 

Investments

 

Restaurants

 

464 

 

$

788,512 

 

28 

%  

Industrial

 

60 

 

 

303,254 

 

11 

 

Health clubs

 

39 

 

 

225,501 

 

 

Early childhood education centers

 

119 

 

 

220,165 

 

 

Movie theaters

 

26 

 

 

194,133 

 

 

Sporting goods stores

 

15 

 

 

122,627 

 

 

Furniture stores

 

20 

 

 

111,623 

 

 

Junior colleges

 

 

 

66,956 

 

 

All other service industries

 

141 

 

 

545,946 

 

20 

 

All other retail industries

 

54 

 

 

227,194 

 

 

 

 

947 

 

$

2,805,911 

 

100 

%  

 


(a)

The dollar amount of investments includes the gross investment in land, buildings, improvements and lease intangibles related to real estate investments as well as the carrying amount of the loans and direct financing receivables.

Significant Credit and Revenue Concentration

STORE Capital’s real estate investments are leased or financed to 226 customers geographically dispersed throughout 46 states. Only one state, Texas (13%), accounted for 10% or more of the total dollar amount of STORE Capital’s investment portfolio at December 31, 2014. None of the Company’s 226 customers represented more than 10% of the Company’s real estate investment portfolio at December 31, 2014, with the largest customer representing less than 4% of the total investment portfolio. On an annualized basis, this largest customer represented less than 4% of the Company’s total investment portfolio revenues as of December 31, 2014. The Company’s customers operate their businesses across 208 concepts and none of these concepts represented more than 4% of the Company’s annualized total investment portfolio revenues as of December 31, 2014.

Intangible Lease Assets

The following details intangible lease assets and related accumulated amortization at December 31 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2014

    

2013

 

In‑place lease assets

 

$

47,359 

 

$

26,641 

(a)

Ground lease interest assets

 

 

7,299 

 

 

3,814 

 

Above-market lease assets

 

 

5,526 

 

 

 

Total intangible lease assets

 

 

60,184 

 

 

30,455 

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(6,006)

 

 

(1,459)

(a)

Net intangible lease assets

 

$

54,178 

 

$

28,996 

 

 


(a)

Includes the dollar amount of in‑place lease intangibles ($538,000) and the related accumulated amortization ($61,000) for the real estate investments held for sale at December 31, 2013.

64


 

Table of Contents

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, aggregate lease intangible amortization expense was $4.0 million, $1.3 million and $175,000, respectively. The amount amortized as a decrease to rental revenue for capitalized above‑market lease intangibles was $592,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Based on the balance of intangible lease assets as of December 31, 2014, the aggregate amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be $4.8 million in 2015, $4.6 million in 2016, $4.5 million in 2017, $4.3 million in 2018, and $4.1 million in 2019, and the amount expected to be amortized as a decrease to rental revenue is $0.8 million for each of the next five years.  The weighted average remaining amortization period is approximately 11 years for the in‑place lease intangibles, approximately 75 years for the amortizing ground lease interests and approximately six years for the above‑market lease intangibles.

Real Estate Investments

The Company’s investment properties are leased to tenants under long‑term operating leases that typically include one or more renewal options. The weighted average remaining noncancelable lease term at December 31, 2014 was approximately 15 years. Substantially all of the leases are triple‑net, which means that the lessees are responsible for the payment of all property operating expenses, including property taxes, maintenance and insurance; therefore, STORE Capital is generally not responsible for repairs or other capital expenditures related to the properties. At December 31, 2014, all of the properties were subject to a lease. 

Scheduled future minimum rentals to be received under the remaining noncancelable term of the operating leases at December 31, 2014, are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

    

$

226,708 

 

2016

 

 

227,014 

 

2017

 

 

227,018 

 

2018

 

 

227,070 

 

2019

 

 

227,095 

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,257,338 

 

Total future minimum rentals

 

$

3,392,243 

 

 

Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the lessee, the preceding table presents future minimum lease payments due during the initial lease term only. In addition, the future minimum lease payments do not include any contingent rentals such as lease escalations based on future changes in CPI.

Loans and Direct Financing Receivables

At December 31, 2014, the Company held nine loans receivable with an aggregate carrying amount of $65.6 million and had $45.8 million of investments in transactions accounted for as direct financing leases. Eight of the loans are mortgage loans secured by land and/or buildings and improvements on the mortgaged property. The majority of the mortgage loans receivable require the borrowers to make monthly principal and interest payments based on a 40‑year amortization period with balloon payments, if any, at maturity. Two of the mortgage loans are shorter-term loans and require monthly interest‑only payments with a balloon payment at maturity. The remaining loan is secured by a tenant’s equipment and requires the borrower to make monthly principal and interest payments with a balloon payment at maturity.

65


 

Table of Contents

The Companys loans and direct financing receivables are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount Outstanding

 

 

 

Stated Interest

 

Maturity

 

December 31,

 

Type

 

Rate

 

Date

 

2014

 

2013

 

Mortgage loan receivable (a)

    

8.25 

%  

 

    

$

    

$

1,939 

 

Mortgage loan receivable

 

8.50 

Jan. 2015

 

 

4,300 

 

 

 

Mortgage loan receivable

 

9.09 

Jan. 2017

 

 

1,933 

 

 

 

Mortgage loan receivable

 

8.35 

Jan. 2028

 

 

3,775 

 

 

3,789 

 

Mortgage loan receivable

 

8.75 

Jul. 2032

 

 

23,998 

 

 

24,119 

 

Mortgage loan receivable

 

9.00 

Mar. 2053

 

 

14,595 

 

 

14,629 

 

Mortgage loan receivable

 

8.75 

Jun. 2053

 

 

6,357 

 

 

6,376 

 

Mortgage loan receivable

 

8.50 

Jun. 2053

 

 

6,697 

 

 

6,262 

 

Mortgage loan receivable

 

8.25 

Aug. 2053

 

 

3,337 

 

 

3,349 

 

Total mortgage loans receivable

 

 

 

 

 

 

64,992 

 

 

60,463 

 

Equipment loan receivable

 

12.00 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000 

 

Equipment loan receivable

 

10.00 

Jan. 2015

 

 

94 

 

 

161 

 

Other secured loan receivable

 

11.00 

 

 

 

 

 

4,834 

 

Total principal amount outstanding—loans receivable

 

 

 

 

 

 

65,086 

 

 

66,458 

 

Unamortized loan origination costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

497 

 

 

459 

 

Direct financing receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

45,771 

 

 

 

Total loans and direct financing receivables

 

 

 

 

 

$

111,354 

 

$

66,917 

 

 


(a)

Loan receivable was repaid in full through a non‑cash transaction in which the Company purchased the two underlying mortgaged properties and leased them back to the borrower.

The long‑term mortgage loans receivable generally allow for prepayments in whole, but not in part, without penalty or with penalties ranging from 1% to 5%, depending on the timing of the prepayment. All other loans receivable allow for prepayments in whole or in part without penalty. Absent prepayments, scheduled maturities are expected to be as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scheduled

 

Balloon

 

Total

 

 

 

Principal

 

Payments

 

Payments

 

2015

    

$

221 

    

$

4,394 

    

$

4,615 

 

2016

 

 

226 

 

 

 

 

226 

 

2017

 

 

246 

 

 

1,933 

 

 

2,179 

 

2018

 

 

268 

 

 

 

 

268 

 

2019

 

 

293 

 

 

 

 

293 

 

Thereafter

 

 

33,636 

 

 

23,869 

 

 

57,505 

 

Total principal repayments

 

$

34,890 

 

$

30,196 

 

$

65,086 

 

 

The components of the investments accounted for as direct financing receivables as of December 31, 2014 were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum lease payments receivable

    

$

119,552 

 

Estimated residual value of leased assets

 

 

4,553 

 

Unearned income

 

 

(78,334)

 

Net investment

 

$

45,771 

 

 

4. Debt 

Credit Facility

On September 19, 2014, the Company entered into a new $300 million unsecured revolving credit facility with

66


 

Table of Contents

a group of lenders, which replaced the Company’s previous two secured credit facilities that aggregated $300 million. This facility is used to partially fund real estate acquisitions pending the issuance of long‑term, fixed‑rate debt.

The new facility, which includes an accordion feature that allows the size of the facility to be increased up to $500 million, is for an initial term of three years and includes a one‑year extension option subject to certain conditions and the payment of a 0.2% extension fee. The facility is recourse to the Company and includes a guaranty from STORE Capital Acquisitions, LLC, one of the Company’s direct wholly‑owned subsidiaries. Borrowings under this facility require monthly payments of interest at a rate selected by the Company of either (1) one‑month LIBOR plus a credit spread ranging from 1.75% to 2.50%, or (2) the Base Rate, as defined in the agreement, plus a credit spread ranging from 0.75% to 1.50%. The credit spread used is based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company must also pay a 0.25% non‑use fee on the unused portion of the facility. Borrowing availability under the facility is limited to 50% of the value of the Company’s eligible unencumbered assets at any point in time. At December 31, 2014, the Company had no borrowings outstanding and a pool of eligible unencumbered assets aggregating approximately $900 million. 

The Company is subject to various financial and nonfinancial covenants under this unsecured credit facility including a maximum leverage of 65%, minimum EBITDA to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1, minimum consolidated net worth of $600 million plus 75% of any additional equity raised after September 2014, and a maximum dividend payout ratio limited to 95% of Funds from Operations, all as defined in the agreement. As of December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

Prior to September 19, 2014, the Company had two bank credit facilities that were secured by real estate properties which were pledged as collateral under the facilities as well as the Companys equity interests in certain of its special purpose entity subsidiaries and the Companys holdings of the Class B notes issued under its STORE Master Funding debt program (see below). One of the secured credit facilities consisted of two parts: a primary two‑year $150 million credit line (bearing interest at one‑month LIBOR plus 2.45%), which was expandable to $250 million under certain circumstances, and a one‑year $50 million credit line (bearing interest at one‑month LIBOR plus 2.95%). The Companys other previous secured credit facility was a three‑year $100 million facility (bearing interest at one‑month LIBOR plus 3.00%), with an accordion feature to increase the facility amount up to $150 million under certain circumstances.

The financing costs related to the establishment of the Company’s credit facilities are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the term of the credit facilities.  The Company accelerated the amortization of the remaining deferred financing costs related to the two previous credit facilities upon their termination in September 2014. The amount accelerated totaled $1.2 million and is included in interest expenseAt December 31, 2014 and 2013, unamortized financing costs related to the Company’s credit facilities totaled $2.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively.

Non‑Recourse Debt Obligations of Consolidated Special Purpose Entities

During 2012, the Company implemented a debt issuance program pursuant to which certain of its consolidated special purpose entities issue multiple series of non‑recourse net‑lease mortgage notes from time to time that are collateralized by the assets owned by these entities and their related leases (collateral). One of the principal features of the program is that, as additional series of notes are issued, new collateral is contributed to the collateral pool thereby increasing the size and diversity of the collateral pool for the benefit of all noteholders, including those who invested in prior series. Another feature of the program is the ability to substitute collateral from time to time subject to meeting certain prescribed conditions and criteria. The notes are generally segregated into Class A amortizing notes and Class B non‑amortizing notes. The Company has retained each of the Class B notes which aggregate $78 million at December 31, 2014.

The Class A notes require monthly principal and interest payments with a balloon payment due at maturity and these notes may be prepaid at any time, subject to a yield maintenance prepayment premium. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate collateral pool securing the net‑lease mortgage notes is comprised primarily of single tenant commercial real estate properties with an aggregate gross investment amount of approximately $1.5 billion.

A number of additional consolidated special purpose entity subsidiaries of the Company have financed their owned real estate properties with traditional first mortgage debt. The notes require monthly principal and interest

67


 

Table of Contents

payments with balloon payments at maturity. In general, these mortgage notes payable can be prepaid in whole or in part upon payment of a yield maintenance premium. The mortgage notes payable are collateralized by real estate properties owned by these consolidated special purpose entity subsidiaries with an aggregate gross investment amount of approximately $327 million at December 31, 2014.

The mortgage notes payable, which are obligations of consolidated special purpose entities as described in Note 2, contain various covenants customarily found in mortgage notes, including a limitation on the issuing entitys ability to incur additional indebtedness on the underlying real estate. Although this mortgage debt generally is non‑recourse, there are customary limited exceptions to recourse for matters such as fraud, misrepresentation, gross negligence or willful misconduct, misapplication of payments, bankruptcy and environmental liabilities. Certain of the mortgage notes payable also require the posting of cash reserves with the lender or trustee if specified coverage ratios are not maintained by the Company or one of its tenants.

Financing costs related to the issuance of the non‑recourse debt obligations are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the terms of the related notes. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, unamortized financing costs related to all non‑recourse debt obligations totaled $30.9 million and $26.9 million, respectively.

The non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entity subsidiaries are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Coupon

    

Outstanding Balance

 

 

 

Maturity

 

Interest

 

December 31,

 

 

 

Date

 

Rate

 

2014

 

2013

 

Non‑recourse net‑lease mortgage notes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012‑1, Class A

 

Aug. 2019

 

5.77 

%  

$

207,503 

 

$

210,612 

 

Series 2013‑1, Class A‑1

 

Mar. 2020

 

4.16 

%  

 

145,876 

 

 

148,274 

 

Series 2013‑2, Class A‑1

 

Jul. 2020

 

4.37 

%  

 

104,740 

 

 

106,352 

 

Series 2013‑3, Class A‑1

 

Nov. 2020

 

4.24 

%  

 

75,767 

 

 

76,907 

 

Series 2014‑1, Class A‑1

 

Apr. 2021

 

4.21 

%  

 

119,650 

 

 

 

Series 2013‑1, Class A‑2

 

Mar. 2023

 

4.65 

%  

 

99,196 

 

 

100,827 

 

Series 2013‑2, Class A‑2

 

Jul. 2023

 

5.33 

%  

 

94,951 

 

 

96,412 

 

Series 2013‑3, Class A‑2

 

Nov. 2023

 

5.21 

%  

 

98,398 

 

 

99,880 

 

Series 2014‑1, Class A‑2

 

Apr. 2024

 

5.00 

%  

 

139,592 

 

 

 

Non‑recourse mortgage notes payable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$21,443 note issued July 2005 (a)

 

Aug. 2015

 

5.26 

% (a)  

 

18,956 

 

 

 

$4,000 note issued August 2006 (b)

 

Sept. 2016

 

6.33 

% (b)  

 

3,326 

 

 

3,428 

 

$3,800 note issued September 2006 (c)

 

Oct. 2016

 

6.47 

% (c)  

 

3,512 

 

 

 

$7,088 note issued April 2007 (d)

 

May 2017

 

6.00 

% (d)  

 

6,676 

 

 

6,776 

 

$4,400 note issued August 2007 (e)

 

Sept. 2017

 

6.7665 

% (e)  

 

3,807 

 

 

 

$8,000 note issued January 2012; assumed in December 2013

 

Jan. 2018

 

4.778 

%  

 

7,511 

 

 

7,775 

 

$20,530 note issued December 2011 and amended February 2012

 

Jan. 2019

 

5.275 

% (f)  

 

19,317 

 

 

19,758 

 

$6,500 note issued December 2012

 

Dec. 2019

 

4.806 

%  

 

6,207 

 

 

6,351 

 

$2,823 note issued December 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,749 

 

$2,956 note issued June 2013

 

Jun. 2020

 

3.154 

% (g)  

 

2,827 

 

 

2,907 

 

$16,100 note issued February 2014

 

Mar. 2021

 

4.83 

%  

 

15,857 

 

 

 

$13,000 note issued May 2012

 

May 2022

 

5.195 

%  

 

12,326 

 

 

12,599 

 

$14,950 note issued July 2012

 

Aug. 2022

 

4.95 

%  

 

13,863 

 

 

14,547 

 

$26,000 note issued August 2012

 

Sept. 2022

 

5.05 

%  

 

24,805 

 

 

25,353 

 

$6,400 note issued November 2012

 

Dec. 2022

 

4.707 

%  

 

6,127 

 

 

6,267 

 

$11,895 note issued March 2013

 

Apr. 2023

 

4.7315 

%  

 

11,478 

 

 

11,733 

 

$17,500 note issued August 2013

 

Sept. 2023

 

5.46 

%  

 

17,091 

 

 

17,420 

 

$10,075 note issued March 2014

 

Apr. 2024

 

5.10 

%  

 

9,984 

 

 

 

$7,750 note issued February 2013

 

Mar. 2038

 

4.81 

% (h)  

 

7,468 

 

 

7,633 

 

$6,944 notes issued March 2013

 

Apr. 2038

 

4.50 

% (i)  

 

6,684 

 

 

6,842 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,283,495 

 

 

991,402 

 

Unamortized net premium

 

 

 

 

 

 

656 

 

 

175 

 

Total non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,284,151 

 

$

991,577 

 

68


 

Table of Contents

 


(a)

Note was assumed in June 2014 at a premium; estimated effective yield at assumption of 3.69%.

(b)

Note was assumed in July 2012 at a premium; estimated effective yield at assumption of 5.15%.

(c)

Note was assumed in April 2014 at a premium; estimated effective yield at assumption of 3.88%.

(d)

Note was assumed in December 2013 at a premium; estimated effective yield at assumption of 4.45%.

(e)

Note was assumed in September 2014 at a premium; estimated effective yield at assumption of 3.40%.

(f)

Note is a variable‑rate note which resets monthly at 1‑month LIBOR + 3.50%. The Company has entered into two interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the floating rate on a $12.7 million portion and a $6.6 million portion of this mortgage note payable to fixed rates of 5.299% and 5.230%, respectively (Note 5).

(g)

Note is a variable‑rate note which resets monthly at 1‑month LIBOR + 3.00%; rate shown is effective rate at December 31, 2014.

(h)

Interest rate is effective for first 10 years and will reset to greater of (1) initial rate plus 400 basis points or (2) Treasury rate plus 400 basis points.

(i)

Interest rate is effective for first 10 years and will reset to the lenders then prevailing interest rate.

As of December 31, 2014, the scheduled maturities, including balloon payments, on the non‑recourse debt obligations during the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Scheduled

    

Balloon

    

 

 

 

 

 

Principal

 

Payments

 

Total

 

2015

 

$

19,191 

 

$

18,710 

 

$

37,901 

 

2016

 

 

19,789 

 

 

6,549 

 

 

26,338 

 

2017

 

 

20,517 

 

 

9,921 

 

 

30,438 

 

2018

 

 

21,071 

 

 

6,665 

 

 

27,736 

 

2019

 

 

19,766 

 

 

213,539 

 

 

233,305 

 

Thereafter

 

 

50,847 

 

 

876,930 

 

 

927,777 

 

 

 

$

151,181 

 

$

1,132,314 

 

$

1,283,495 

 

 

5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had entered into two interest rate swap agreements with current notional amounts of $12.7 million and $6.6 million that were designated as cash flow hedges associated with the Company’s secured, variable‑rate mortgage note payable due 2019 (Note 4). The aggregate fair value of the interest rate swaps at December 31, 2014 and 2013 was a liability of $266,000 and $128,000, respectively, and is included in liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to cash flow hedges will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the hedged debt transaction. During 2014, $457,000 of unrealized losses and, during 2013, $414,000 of unrealized gains and, during 2012, $911,000 of unrealized losses were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.  During 2014, 2013 and 2012, $319,000, $319,000 and $306,000, respectively, were reclassified to operations as an increase to interest expense. During the next 12 months, the Company estimates that $274,000 will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. No hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 or 2012. 

The Company has an agreement with its derivative counterparty containing a provision that, if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.

As of December 31, 2014, the termination value of the Company’s derivatives was a liability position of $308,000 which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk.

69


 

Table of Contents

6. Income Taxes

The Companys total current income tax expense from continuing operations was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2014

    

2013

    

2012

 

Federal income tax

 

$

 

$

 

$

(2)

 

State income tax

 

 

180 

 

 

155 

 

 

72 

 

Total current income tax expense

 

$

180 

 

$

155 

 

$

70 

 

 

During 2013, $853,000 of federal income tax and $132,000 of state income tax, were attributable to discontinued operations (Note 9) of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary. There was no current income tax expense attributable to discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2012. The Company’s deferred income tax expense was immaterial for the years ended December 2014, 2013 and 2012. The ending balance in deferred tax assets and liabilities was immaterial at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The Company files federal, state and local income tax returns. All returns filed since the Company’s inception in 2011 remain subject to examination. The Company has net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) for income tax purposes of $1.5 million at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. These losses are available to reduce future REIT taxable income until they expire in 2031.  At this time, the Company does not believe it is likely it will use the NOLs to reduce future taxable income; therefore, any deferred tax asset associated with such NOLs has been fully reserved.

Management of the Company determines whether any tax positions taken or expected to be taken meet the “more‑likely‑than‑not” threshold of being sustained by the applicable federal, state or local tax authority. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, management concluded that there is no tax liability relating to uncertain income tax positions. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest related to any underpayment of income taxes as interest expense and to recognize any penalties as operating expenses. There was no accrual for interest or penalties at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

For federal income tax purposes, distributions can consist of ordinary income dividends, capital gain dividends, return of capital, or a combination thereof. For the year ended December 31, 2014, preferred dividends of $14,000 paid in 2014 were characterized for tax as $13,000 of ordinary income and $1,000 of capital gain.  For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, preferred dividends of $16,000 paid in each year were characterized for tax as ordinary income.

The Companys common stock distributions declared were characterized for tax as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Ordinary income

    

$

56,887 

    

$

33,602 

    

$

10,333 

 

Capital gain

 

 

4,109 

 

 

 

 

18 

 

Return of capital

 

 

3,127 

 

 

12,958 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

64,123 

 

$

46,560 

 

$

10,351 

 

 

For tax purposes, $13.0 million of the 2014 distributions declared will be treated as distributions in 2015 and $1.9 million of the 2012 distributions declared were treated as distributions in 2013.  In addition, $500,000, $294,000 and $46,000 of the distributions declared in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were treated as compensation to holders of unvested restricted stock.

7. Stockholders Equity

On November 3, 2014, the Companys board of directors declared a 1.67‑for‑one split of its common stock effected through a dividend to its stockholders. The stock dividend was treated as a stock split for accounting purposes; the $0.01 par value of the common stock was unchanged.

70


 

Table of Contents

During 2014 and prior to the IPO, the Company issued approximately 20.2 million common shares related to the contribution of the remaining $290.4 million equity commitment from its parent, STORE Holding. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, STORE Holding held 82,802,026 and 62,594,268 common shares, respectively.

On November 21, 2014, the Company completed its IPO of 31,625,000 shares of common stock, including 4,125,000 shares of common stock sold in connection with the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, at a public offering price of $18.50 per share. The Company received $545.8 million in proceeds, net of both underwriters’ discount and offering expenses, in connection with the offering. 

The Company declared dividends payable to common stockholders totaling $77.7 million, $45.0 million and $12.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The 2014 dividends include a pro-rated dividend per common share of $0.1139, or $1.00 per share on an annualized basis, for the period since the closing of the IPO through December 31, 2014, which was paid in January 2015.  On December 31, 2014, there were 115,212,541 shares of common stock outstanding, including 31,625,000 shares issued pursuant to the initial public offering, 82,802,026 shares held by STORE Holding, and 785,515 shares granted under the Company’s long-term incentive plans (Note 8). 

The Company issued 125 shares of 12.5% Series A Cumulative Non‑Voting Preferred Stock (Preferred Stock) at a price of $1,000 per share on January 6, 2012. On November 21, 2014, immediately following the closing of its IPO, the Company elected to redeem all 125 shares of its Preferred Stock for a redemption price of $1,000 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends.   During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company paid dividends on the Preferred Stock of $14,000, $16,000 and $16,000, respectively.

8. Long‑Term Incentive Plans

In June 2012, the Companys Board of Directors established the STORE Capital Corporation 2012 Long‑Term Incentive Plan (the 2012 Plan) which permits the issuance of up to 1,035,400 shares of common stock. The 2012 Plan allows for awards of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and other awards and performance‑based grants to officers, directors and key employees of the Company.  As of December 31, 2014, 249,885 shares remain available for grant under the 2012 Plan.

The following table summarizes the restricted common stock activity under the 2012 Plan: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number of

 

Average Share

 

Number of

 

Average Share

 

Number of

 

Average Share

 

 

 

Shares

 

Price (1)

 

Shares

 

Price (1)

 

Shares

 

Price (1)

 

Outstanding non‑vested shares, beginning of year

    

336,203 

    

$

13.59 

    

145,776 

    

$

11.98 

    

    

$

 

Shares granted

 

416,403 

 

$

17.35 

 

228,804 

 

$

14.37 

 

145,776 

 

$

11.98 

 

Shares vested

 

(93,160)

 

$

13.44 

 

(36,449)

 

$

11.98 

 

 

$

 

Shares forfeited

 

(3,540)

 

$

14.30 

 

(1,928)

 

$

14.14 

 

 

$

 

Outstanding non‑vested shares, end of year

 

655,906 

 

$

16.00 

 

336,203 

 

$

13.59 

 

145,776 

 

$

11.98 

 

 


(1)

Grant date fair value

The Company estimates the fair value of restricted stock at the date of grant and recognizes that amount in expense over the vesting period as the greater of the amount amortized on a straight‑line basis or the amount vested. Prior to the Company’s IPO, the fair value was based on the per-share price of the common stock issued in the Company’s private equity offerings.  Subsequent to the IPO, the fair value of the restricted stock is based on the per‑share market closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.  Generally, restricted shares granted vest in 25% increments in February of each year.  Certain directors receive annual grants that vest at the end of each term served.  Compensation expense for share‑based payments totaled $2.3 million, $1.2 million and $356,000 for

71


 

Table of Contents

the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses. 

Due to a historically low turnover rate, the Company does not estimate a forfeiture rate for non-vested shares. Accordingly, unexpected forfeitures will lower share-based compensation expense during the applicable period. Under the terms of the 2012 Plan, the Company pays non-refundable dividends to the holders of non-vested shares. Applicable accounting guidance requires that the dividends paid to holders of these non-vested shares be charged as compensation expense to the extent that they relate to non-vested shares that do not or are not expected to vest. At December 31, 2014, STORE Capital had $8.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non‑vested share‑based compensation arrangements which will be recognized through February 2019.

In November 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the adoption of the STORE Capital Corporation 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the 2015 Plan), which permits the issuance of up to 6,903,076 shares of common stock, which represented 6% of the number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock upon the completion of the IPO.  The 2015 Plan allows for awards of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and other awards and performance‑based grants to officers, directors and key employees of the Company. As of December 31, 2014, no awards had been issued under the 2015 Plan. 

9. Income from Discontinued Operations

Periodically, the Company may sell real estate properties it owns. Effective January 1, 2014, the Company has early adopted ASU 2014‑08 (Note 2) and will apply the provisions prospectively. Under ASU 2014‑08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations of the Company and that have (or will have) a major effect on the Companys operations and financial results are to be presented as discontinued operations. The Company is required to continue to classify any property disposal or property classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013 as discontinued operations prospectively; therefore, the gains and losses from these property dispositions and all operations from these properties were reclassified to discontinued operations, net of tax, in the consolidated statements of income. This presentation has no impact on net income or cash flow. The Company did not classify any additional property disposals as discontinued operations subsequent to December 31, 2013.

All amounts reclassified to discontinued operations during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, relate to assets that had been classified as held for sale prior to the Companys adoption of ASU 2014‑08. Amounts reclassified to discontinued operations are summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Revenues

    

$

157 

    

$

2,425 

    

$

853 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

 

 

17 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

575 

 

 

147 

 

Total expenses

 

 

 

 

592 

 

 

154 

 

Income from discontinued real estate investments

 

 

155 

 

 

1,833 

 

 

699 

 

Gain on the dispositions of real estate investments

 

 

985 

 

 

3,147 

 

 

180 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

(985)

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

$

1,140 

 

$

3,995 

 

$

879 

 

 

10. Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various types of commitments to purchase real estate properties. These commitments are generally subject to the Companys customary due diligence process and, accordingly, a number of specific conditions must be met before the Company is obligated to purchase the properties. At the time the Company purchases a property, the Company may also agree to fund future improvements to the property. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $33.9 million in commitments to fund improvements to real estate properties previously acquired which will generally result in increases to the rental revenue due under the related contracts.

72


 

Table of Contents

The Company entered into a lease agreement with an unrelated third party for its corporate office space that will expire in June 2018. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, total rent expense was $252,000, $220,000 and $220,000, respectively.  At December 31, 2014, the Company’s future minimum rental commitments under all noncancelable operating leases was approximately $290,000 in 2015, $300,000 in 2016, $313,000 in 2017 and $158,000 in 2018.

The Company has had employment agreements with its executive officers since its formation in May 2011. In connection with the closing of the IPO on November 21, 2014, the Company entered into new employment agreements with each of its executive officers, which have a term of four years.  The agreements provide for minimum annual base salaries and annual incentive compensation based on the satisfactory achievement of reasonable performance criteria and objectives to be adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors each year.  In addition, each officer is eligible to receive equity awards as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors under the 2015 Plan.  In the event an executive officer is terminated without cause or terminates employment for good reason, the Company is liable for a lump‑sum severance payment in an amount equal to, in the case of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the sum of (i) two times his base salary and (ii) two times the target cash bonus for which he was eligible in the prior fiscal year (whether or not received); and, in the case of the Company’s other executive officers, the sum of (i) 1.5 times his or her base salary and (ii) 1.5 times the target cash bonus for which he or she was eligible in the prior fiscal year (whether or not received); plus, in the case of all executive officers, certain other specified termination benefits.  In the event of a termination without cause, as defined in the employment agreements, the executive officer is entitled to immediate vesting of any and all outstanding unvested shares of the Company’s restricted stock that he or she has been awarded as part of the Company’s incentive compensation program.

In October 2011, the Company adopted a defined contribution retirement savings plan qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the 401(k) Plan). The 401(k) Plan is available to employees who have completed at least six consecutive months of service or, if earlier, one year of service with the Company. STORE Capital provides a matching contribution in cash, up to a maximum of 4% of compensation, which vests immediately. The matching contributions made by the Company totaled approximately $258,000 in 2014, $160,000 in 2013 and $109,000 in 2012.

11. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The hierarchy described below prioritizes inputs to the valuation techniques used in measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities. This hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring the most observable inputs to be used when available. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

·

Level 1Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

·

Level 2Significant inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These types of inputs would include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets in inactive markets and market‑corroborated inputs.

·

Level 3Inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement of the assets or liabilities. These types of inputs include the Companys own assumptions.

The assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value in the Companys consolidated financial statements are summarized below.

73


 

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the Companys financial liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Hierarchy Level

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

December 31, 2014

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

266 

 

$

 

$

266 

 

$

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

128 

 

$

 

$

128 

 

$

 

 

Derivatives are measured under a market approach, using prices obtained from a nationally recognized pricing service and pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the fair value of the derivative instruments was a liability and is included in liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

In addition to the disclosures for assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value at the balance sheet date, companies are required to disclose the estimated fair values of all financial instruments, even if they are not carried at their fair value. The fair values of financial instruments are estimates based upon market conditions and perceived risks at December 31, 2014 and 2013. These estimates require management’s judgment and may not be indicative of the future fair values of the assets and liabilities.

Financial assets and liabilities for which the carrying values approximate their fair values include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and escrow deposits, accounts receivable, accounts payable and tenant deposits. Generally these assets and liabilities are short‑term in duration and are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company believes that the carrying value of the borrowings on its credit facility approximate fair value based upon their nature, terms and variable interest rate. Additionally, the Company believes the carrying values of its fixed‑rate loan receivables approximate fair values based on market quotes for comparable instruments or discounted cash flow analysis using estimates of the amount and timing of future cash flows, market rates and credit spreads.

The estimated fair values of the non‑recourse debt obligations of consolidated special purpose entities have been derived based on market observable inputs such as interest rates and discounted cash flow analyses using estimates of the amount and timing of future cash flows, market rates and credit spreads. These measurements are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At December 31, 2014, the Company’s non‑recourse debt obligations had a carrying value of $1,284.2 million and an estimated fair value of $1,349.0 million. At December 31, 2013, the Company’s non‑recourse debt obligations had a carrying value of $991.6 million and an estimated fair value of $1.0 billion.

12. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

The following schedule summarizes the Company’s supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities and other cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2014

    

2013

    

2012

 

Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued tenant improvement advances included in real estate investments

 

$

12,081 

 

$

 

$

 

Purchase of collateral properties securing a mortgage note receivable

 

 

1,939 

 

 

7,875 

 

 

 

Non‑recourse debt obligations assumed in conjunction with acquisition of property

 

 

27,457 

 

 

14,911 

 

 

3,711 

 

Accrued financing costs

 

 

157 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued offering costs

 

 

791 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

60,431 

 

$

33,972 

 

$

8,757 

 

Cash paid during the period for income and franchise taxes

 

 

674 

 

 

1,601 

 

 

185 

 

 

74


 

Table of Contents

13. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial information for 2014 and 2013. All adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the interim periods presented are included. The calculation of basic and diluted per share amounts for each quarter is based on the weighted average shares outstanding for that period; consequently, the sum of the quarters may not necessarily be equal to the full year basic and diluted net income per share (amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

First Quarter

    

Second Quarter

    

Third Quarter

    

Fourth Quarter

    

Total

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

39,329 

 

$

45,022 

 

$

50,928 

 

$

55,162 

 

$

190,441 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

8,693 

 

 

9,035 

 

 

10,622 

 

 

14,156 

 

 

42,506 

 

Net income

 

 

9,539 

 

 

10,422 

 

 

10,755 

 

 

17,423 

 

 

48,139 

 

Basic and diluted income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

0.14 

 

 

0.14 

 

 

0.13 

 

 

0.18 

 

 

0.59 

 

Net income

 

 

0.15 

 

 

0.15 

 

 

0.13 

 

 

0.18 

 

 

0.61 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

 

0.2395 

 

 

0.2455 

 

 

0.2870 

 

 

0.2178 

 

 

0.9898 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

First Quarter

    

Second Quarter

    

Third Quarter

    

Fourth Quarter

    

Total

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

20,939 

 

$

25,501 

 

$

29,101 

 

$

33,363 

 

$

108,904 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

3,507 

 

 

5,610 

 

 

6,089 

 

 

7,112 

 

 

22,318 

 

Net income

 

 

4,221 

 

 

6,771 

 

 

7,816 

 

 

7,505 

 

 

26,313 

 

Basic and diluted income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

0.08 

 

 

0.11 

 

 

0.12 

 

 

0.13 

 

 

0.44 

 

Net income

 

 

0.10 

 

 

0.14 

 

 

0.15 

 

 

0.13 

 

 

0.52 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

 

0.2096 

 

 

0.2156 

 

 

0.2216 

 

 

0.2275 

 

 

0.8743 

 

 

75


 

Table of Contents

Item 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The disclosure controls and procedures of the Company are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. As a result, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that such disclosure controls and procedures will meet their objectives.

As of December 31, 2014, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company concluded that the Company’s design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level described above.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This Annual Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for newly public companies.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth fiscal quarter to which this report relates that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of the Company.

Item 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

None.

76


 

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the headings “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance Matters – Information Regarding the Board and its Committees,” “Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (2015 Proxy Statement). 

Our Board of Directors has adopted a  code of business conduct and ethics (Code of Ethics) that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees. Our Code of Ethics is available free of charge on our website, www.storecapital.com, and is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the heading “Corporate Governance Matters” in our 2015 Proxy Statement.  We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, any provision of our Code of Ethics by posting such amendment or waiver on our website.

Item 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the headings “Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance Matters – Director Compensation” and “Corporate Governance Matters – Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our 2015 Proxy Statement.

Item 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the heading “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock by Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our 2015 Proxy Statement.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following information reflects certain information about our equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number of securities

    

 

    

Number of securities

 

 

 

to be issued upon

 

Weighted-average

 

available for future issuance

 

 

 

exercise of

 

exercise price of

 

under equity compensation

 

 

 

outstanding options,

 

outstanding options,

 

plans (excluding securities

 

Plan category

 

warrants and rights

 

warrants and rights

 

reflected in column (a))

 

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 

 

 

7,152,961 
(1)

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

7,152,961 

 

 


(1)

Represents 6,903,076 shares available for future issuance under the STORE Capital Corporation 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan and 249,885 shares available for future issuance under the STORE Capital Corporation 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

Item 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the headings “Corporate Governance Matters – Director Independence” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in our 2015 Proxy Statement.

77


 

Table of Contents

Item 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the heading “Proposal No. 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Auditors – Accounting Fees and Services” in our 2015 Proxy Statement.

78


 

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report:

1. Financial Statements. (see Item 8)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Financial Statement Schedules. (see schedules beginning on page F-1)

Schedule IIIReal Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

Schedule IVMortgage Loans on Real Estate

 

All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

 

3. Exhibits. The exhibits filed with this Annual Report are set forth in the Exhibit Index.

 

79


 

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

STORE CAPITAL CORPORATION

 

 

Date:  March 10, 2015

By:

/s/ Christopher H. Volk

 

 

Christopher H. Volk

 

 

Chief Executive Officer and
President (Principal Executive Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below on March 10, 2015 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Christopher H. Volk

 

Director, President and Chief Executive

 

March 10, 2015

Christopher H. Volk

 

Officer (principal executive officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Catherine Long

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal

 

March 10, 2015

Catherine Long

 

financial and accounting officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Morton H. Fleischer

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

March 10, 2015

Morton H. Fleischer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Mahesh Balakrishnan

 

Director

 

March 10, 2015

Mahesh Balakrishnan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Manish Desai

 

Director

 

March 10, 2015

Manish Desai

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Ken Liang

 

Director

 

March 10, 2015

Ken Liang

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Rajath Shourie

 

Director

 

March 10, 2015

Rajath Shourie

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Derek Smith

 

Director

 

March 10, 2015

Derek Smith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Joseph M. Donovan

 

Director

 

March 10, 2015

Joseph M. Donovan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Quentin P. Smith, Jr.

 

Director

 

March 10, 2015

Quentin P. Smith, Jr.

 

 

 

 

 

80


 

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this Annual Report.  References under the caption “Location” to exhibits or other filings indicate that the exhibit or other filing has been filed, that the indexed exhibit and the exhibit referred to are the same and that the exhibit referred to is incorporated by reference.  Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements filed as exhibits to this Annual Report are identified by an asterisk.  The SEC file number for STORE Capital Corporation’s Exchange Act filings referenced below is 1-36739.

 

Exhibit

 

Description

 

Location

3.1

 

Articles of Amendment and Restatement of STORE Capital Corporation filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on November 18, 2014.

 

Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 21, 2014.

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of STORE Capital Corporation dated November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 21, 2014.

4.1

 

Form of Common Stock Certificate.

 

Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 21, 2014.

4.2

 

Third Amended and Restated Master Indenture dated as of May 6, 2014, among STORE Master Funding I, LLC, STORE Master Funding II, LLC, STORE Master Funding III, LLC, STORE Master Funding IV,  LLC and STORE Master Funding V, LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company, collectively as issuers, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee, relating to Net-Lease Mortgage Notes.

 

Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

4.3

 

Series 2012-1 Indenture Supplement dated as of August 23, 2012, between STORE Master Funding I, LLC and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee.

 

Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

4.4

 

Series 2013-1 Indenture Supplement dated as of March 27, 2013, between STORE Master Funding I, LLC, STORE Master Funding II, LLC and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee.

 

Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

4.5

 

Series 2013-2 Indenture Supplement dated as of July 25, 2013, between STORE Master Funding I, LLC, STORE Master Funding II, LLC, STORE Master Funding III, LLC and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee.

 

Exhibit 4.4 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

4.6

 

Series 2013-3 Indenture Supplement dated as of December 3, 2013, among STORE Master Funding I, LLC, STORE Master Funding II, LLC STORE Master Funding III, LLC, STORE Master Funding IV, LLC and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee.

 

Exhibit 4.5 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

4.7

 

Series 2014-1 Indenture Supplement dated as of May 6, 2014, among STORE Master Funding I, LLC, STORE Master Funding II, LLC, STORE Master Funding III, LLC, STORE Master Funding IV, LLC, STORE Master Funding V, LLC and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee.

 

Exhibit 4.6 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

81


 

10.1

 

Third Amended and Restated Property Management and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 6, 2014, among STORE Master Funding I, LLC, STORE Master Funding II, LLC, STORE Master Funding III, LLC, STORE Mastering Funding IV, LLC and STORE Master Funding V, LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company, collectively as issuers, STORE Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation, as property manager and special servicer, and Midland Loan Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as back-up manager and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee.

 

Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

10.2

 

Stockholders Agreement among STORE Capital Corporation and the persons named therein, effective as of November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.3

 

Registration Rights Agreement among STORE Capital Corporation and the persons named therein, effective as of November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.4

*

STORE Capital Corporation 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, effective as of November 20, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.5

*

STORE Capital Corporation 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

10.6

*

Form of 2012 Long-Term Incentive Award Plan Restricted Stock Award Grant Agreement.

 

Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

10.7

*

STORE Capital Corporation Director Compensation Program.

 

Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

10.8

*

Form of Indemnification Agreement between STORE Capital Corporation and each of its directors and executive officers.

 

Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.9

*

Employment Agreement among STORE Capital Corporation, STORE Capital Advisors, LLC and Christopher H. Volk, effective as of November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.10

*

Employment Agreement among STORE Capital Corporation, STORE Capital Advisors, LLC and Michael T. Bennett, effective as of November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.11

*

Employment Agreement among STORE Capital Corporation, STORE Capital Advisors, LLC and Catherine Long, effective as of November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.12

*

Employment Agreement among STORE Capital Corporation, STORE Capital Advisors, LLC and Mary Fedewa, effective as of November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

82


 

10.13

*

Employment Agreement among STORE Capital Corporation, STORE Capital Advisors, LLC and Michael J. Zieg, effective as of November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.14

*

Employment Agreement among STORE Capital Corporation, STORE Capital Advisors, LLC and Christopher K. Burbach, effective as of November 21, 2014.

 

Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2014 and filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.

10.15

 

Credit Agreement dated as of September 19, 2014, by and among STORE Capital Corporation, as Borrower, KeyBank National Association, the other Lenders which are parties thereto and other Lenders that may become parties thereto, KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, BMO Harris Bank, N.A. and Regions Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents, and KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners.

 

Exhibit 10.21 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated and filed with the SEC as of September 23, 2014 (File No. 333-198486).

21

 

List of Subsidiaries.

 

Filed herewith.

23

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

 

Filed herewith.

31.1

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

 

Filed herewith.

31.2

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

 

Filed herewith.

32.1

 

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

 

Filed herewith.

32.2

 

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

 

Filed herewith.

 


*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

 

 

 

83


 

Table of Contents

STORE Capital Corporation

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Benson

 

MN

 

(f)

 

$
187 

 

$
627 

 

$

- 

 

$

- 

 

$
187 

 

$
627 

 

$
814 

 

$
(98)

 

1987

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Glencoe

 

MN

 

(f)

 

369 

 

772 

 

- 

 

- 

 

369 

 

772 

 

1,141 

 

(122)

 

1986

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Little Falls

 

MN

 

(f)

 

456 

 

803 

 

- 

 

- 

 

456 

 

803 

 

1,259 

 

(150)

 

1983

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Minneapolis

 

MN

 

(f)

 

243 

 

590 

 

34 

 

169 

 

277 

 

759 

 

1,036 

 

(102)

 

1996

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Sauk Rapids

 

MN

 

(f)

 

224 

 

887 

 

- 

 

- 

 

224 

 

887 

 

1,111 

 

(118)

 

1996

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Staples

 

MN

 

(f)

 

213 

 

729 

 

- 

 

- 

 

213 

 

729 

 

942 

 

(108)

 

1987

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Wadena

 

MN

 

(f)

 

171 

 

732 

 

- 

 

- 

 

171 

 

732 

 

903 

 

(98)

 

1980

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Valley City

 

ND

 

(f)

 

217 

 

676 

 

- 

 

- 

 

217 

 

676 

 

893 

 

(116)

 

1984

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Wahpeton

 

ND

 

(f)

 

314 

 

589 

 

- 

 

- 

 

314 

 

589 

 

903 

 

(94)

 

1987

 

07/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Mobridge

 

SD

 

(f)

 

336 

 

517 

 

- 

 

- 

 

336 

 

517 

 

853 

 

(117)

 

1993

 

07/29/2011

Furniture Stores

 

Austin

 

TX

 

(f)

 

2,212 

 

3,600 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,212 

 

3,600 

 

5,812 

 

(355)

 

2006

 

09/02/2011

Furniture Stores

 

Live Oak

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,885 

 

3,927 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,885 

 

3,927 

 

5,812 

 

(374)

 

2005

 

09/02/2011

Furniture Stores

 

New Braunfels

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,692 

 

6,926 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,692 

 

6,926 

 

8,618 

 

(876)

 

1995

 

09/02/2011

Furniture Stores

 

San Antonio

 

TX

 

(f)

 

2,361 

 

3,952 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,361 

 

3,952 

 

6,313 

 

(393)

 

2006

 

09/02/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Florence

 

AL

 

(f)

 

398 

 

540 

 

- 

 

- 

 

398 

 

540 

 

938 

 

(73)

 

1994

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Vestavia

 

AL

 

(f)

 

310 

 

354 

 

- 

 

- 

 

310 

 

354 

 

664 

 

(47)

 

1972

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

310 

 

325 

 

- 

 

- 

 

310 

 

325 

 

635 

 

(46)

 

1982

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Bainbridge

 

GA

 

(f)

 

147 

 

381 

 

- 

 

- 

 

147 

 

381 

 

528 

 

(52)

 

1989

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Winder

 

GA

 

(f)

 

348 

 

366 

 

- 

 

- 

 

348 

 

366 

 

714 

 

(62)

 

1986

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Evansville

 

IN

 

(f)

 

226 

 

380 

 

- 

 

- 

 

226 

 

380 

 

606 

 

(61)

 

1988

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Louisville

 

KY

 

(f)

 

310 

 

383 

 

- 

 

- 

 

310 

 

383 

 

693 

 

(61)

 

1973

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Florissant

 

MO

 

(f)

 

460 

 

400 

 

- 

 

- 

 

460 

 

400 

 

860 

 

(60)

 

1981

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jackson

 

MS

 

(f)

 

253 

 

460 

 

- 

 

- 

 

253 

 

460 

 

713 

 

(64)

 

1993

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jackson

 

MS

 

(f)

 

225 

 

342 

 

- 

 

- 

 

225 

 

342 

 

567 

 

(45)

 

1983

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cincinnati

 

OH

 

(f)

 

148 

 

467 

 

- 

 

- 

 

148 

 

467 

 

615 

 

(65)

 

1987

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Owasso

 

OK

 

(f)

 

275 

 

301 

 

- 

 

- 

 

275 

 

301 

 

576 

 

(42)

 

1986

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Tulsa

 

OK

 

(f)

 

209 

 

328 

 

- 

 

- 

 

209 

 

328 

 

537 

 

(57)

 

1977

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Antioch

 

TN

 

(f)

 

391 

 

264 

 

- 

 

- 

 

391 

 

264 

 

655 

 

(42)

 

1978

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Clarksville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

239 

 

425 

 

- 

 

- 

 

239 

 

425 

 

664 

 

(60)

 

1993

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

371 

 

323 

 

- 

 

- 

 

371 

 

323 

 

694 

 

(48)

 

1987

 

09/08/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Princeton

 

WV

 

(f)

 

246 

 

408 

 

- 

 

- 

 

246 

 

408 

 

654 

 

(54)

 

1977

 

09/08/2011

Veneer, Plywood, and Engineered Wood Product Manufacturing

 

Delaware

 

OH

 

(f)

 

308 

 

478 

 

- 

 

- 

 

308 

 

478 

 

786 

 

(63)

 

1969

 

09/27/2011

Veneer, Plywood, and Engineered Wood Product Manufacturing

 

Hillsboro

 

OR

 

(f)

 

879 

 

167 

 

- 

 

- 

 

879 

 

167 

 

1,046 

 

(33)

 

1965

 

09/27/2011

Veneer, Plywood, and Engineered Wood Product Manufacturing

 

Stayton

 

OR

 

(f)

 

2,254 

 

2,526 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,254 

 

2,526 

 

4,780 

 

(319)

 

1985

 

09/27/2011

Family Entertainment Centers

 

Webster

 

TX

 

(f)

 

2,135 

 

6,355 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,135 

 

6,355 

 

8,490 

 

(640)

 

2007

 

09/30/2011

Child Day Care Services

 

Laveen

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

1,427 

 

3,012 

 

35 

 

210 

 

1,462 

 

3,222 

 

4,684 

 

(309)

 

2008

 

10/07/2011

Child Day Care Services

 

Maricopa

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

2,212 

 

4,080 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,212 

 

4,080 

 

6,292 

 

(398)

 

2008

 

10/07/2011

Beer, Wine, and Liquor Stores

 

McAllen

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,490 

 

2,220 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,490 

 

2,220 

 

3,710 

 

(346)

 

1955

 

10/07/2011

Beer, Wine, and Liquor Stores

 

Pharr

 

TX

 

(f)

 

699 

 

1,362 

 

- 

 

- 

 

699 

 

1,362 

 

2,061 

 

(197)

 

1989

 

10/07/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Canton

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,101 

 

973 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,101 

 

973 

 

2,074 

 

(138)

 

1998

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fayetteville

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,155 

 

1,210 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,155 

 

1,210 

 

2,365 

 

(173)

 

2004

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Ft. Oglethorpe

 

GA

 

(f)

 

957 

 

986 

 

- 

 

- 

 

957 

 

986 

 

1,943 

 

(128)

 

2003

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Stockbridge

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,135 

 

1,276 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,135 

 

1,276 

 

2,411 

 

(176)

 

2000

 

10/17/2011

F-1


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Camby

 

IN

 

(f)

 

636 

 

1,297 

 

- 

 

- 

 

636 

 

1,297 

 

1,933 

 

(174)

 

2008

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Greenwood

 

IN

 

(f)

 

518 

 

1,196 

 

- 

 

- 

 

518 

 

1,196 

 

1,714 

 

(152)

 

2005

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Georgetown

 

KY

 

(f)

 

727 

 

1,076 

 

- 

 

- 

 

727 

 

1,076 

 

1,803 

 

(144)

 

2002

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Owensboro

 

KY

 

(f)

 

585 

 

1,427 

 

- 

 

- 

 

585 

 

1,427 

 

2,012 

 

(209)

 

1996

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Charlotte

 

NC

 

(f)

 

737 

 

1,087 

 

- 

 

- 

 

737 

 

1,087 

 

1,824 

 

(177)

 

2000

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Greensboro

 

NC

 

(f)

 

626 

 

1,039 

 

- 

 

- 

 

626 

 

1,039 

 

1,665 

 

(159)

 

2004

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Dayton

 

OH

 

(f)

 

1,369 

 

1,357 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,369 

 

1,357 

 

2,726 

 

(193)

 

1998

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Springdale

 

OH

 

(f)

 

1,286 

 

897 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,286 

 

897 

 

2,183 

 

(111)

 

1996

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Cookeville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,528 

 

1,511 

 

691 

 

- 

 

2,219 

 

1,511 

 

3,730 

 

(220)

 

1994

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,161 

 

1,221 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,161 

 

1,221 

 

2,382 

 

(188)

 

2003

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Harrisonburg

 

VA

 

(f)

 

468 

 

1,067 

 

- 

 

- 

 

468 

 

1,067 

 

1,535 

 

(151)

 

2003

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Panama City

 

FL

 

 

 

230 

 

1,451 

 

- 

 

- 

 

230 

 

1,451 

 

1,681 

 

(171)

 

2001

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Augusta

 

GA

 

 

 

853 

 

1,148 

 

- 

 

- 

 

853 

 

1,148 

 

2,001 

 

(151)

 

1997

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Cumming

 

GA

 

 

 

1,375 

 

946 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,375 

 

946 

 

2,321 

 

(140)

 

1998

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lawrenceville

 

GA

 

 

 

985 

 

879 

 

- 

 

- 

 

985 

 

879 

 

1,864 

 

(123)

 

1996

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Snellville

 

GA

 

 

 

1,954 

 

927 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,954 

 

927 

 

2,881 

 

(135)

 

1998

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Frankfort

 

KY

 

 

 

955 

 

916 

 

- 

 

- 

 

955 

 

916 

 

1,871 

 

(133)

 

1998

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lexington

 

KY

 

$19,317

 

533 

 

1,148 

 

- 

 

- 

 

533 

 

1,148 

 

1,681 

 

(146)

 

1988

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Louisville

 

KY

 

 

 

1,216 

 

1,028 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,216 

 

1,028 

 

2,244 

 

(139)

 

1993

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Mansfield

 

OH

 

 

 

725 

 

1,156 

 

- 

 

- 

 

725 

 

1,156 

 

1,881 

 

(172)

 

2003

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Charleston

 

SC

 

 

 

889 

 

1,245 

 

- 

 

- 

 

889 

 

1,245 

 

2,134 

 

(188)

 

2001

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Cleveland

 

TN

 

 

 

1,169 

 

1,346 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,169 

 

1,346 

 

2,515 

 

(208)

 

1996

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Goodlettsville

 

TN

 

 

 

933 

 

1,191 

 

- 

 

- 

 

933 

 

1,191 

 

2,124 

 

(159)

 

1988

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lebanon

 

TN

 

 

 

1,037 

 

1,134 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,037 

 

1,134 

 

2,171 

 

(165)

 

1997

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Morristown

 

TN

 

 

 

803 

 

1,578 

 

- 

 

- 

 

803 

 

1,578 

 

2,381 

 

(238)

 

2000

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lynchburg

 

VA

 

 

 

903 

 

1,078 

 

- 

 

- 

 

903 

 

1,078 

 

1,981 

 

(195)

 

2001

 

10/17/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Bradenton

 

FL

 

(f)

 

785 

 

276 

 

- 

 

- 

 

785 

 

276 

 

1,061 

 

(103)

 

1984

 

10/19/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Sarasota

 

FL

 

(f)

 

848 

 

410 

 

- 

 

- 

 

848 

 

410 

 

1,258 

 

(137)

 

1981

 

10/19/2011

Automotive Repair and Maintenance

 

Prescott Valley

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

241 

 

259 

 

- 

 

- 

 

241 

 

259 

 

500 

 

(33)

 

2003

 

11/01/2011

Automotive Repair and Maintenance

 

Snowflake

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

276 

 

134 

 

- 

 

- 

 

276 

 

134 

 

410 

 

(19)

 

1998

 

11/01/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Davenport

 

IA

 

(f)

 

1,613 

 

2,210 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,613 

 

2,210 

 

3,823 

 

(323)

 

2003

 

11/07/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Eagan

 

MN

 

(f)

 

1,481 

 

2,958 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,481 

 

2,958 

 

4,439 

 

(295)

 

1998

 

11/07/2011

Health Clubs

 

Edinburg

 

TX

 

(f)

 

865 

 

4,109 

 

- 

 

116 

 

865 

 

4,225 

 

5,090 

 

(491)

 

1994

 

11/18/2011

Health Clubs

 

McAllen

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,423 

 

1,540 

 

- 

 

88 

 

1,423 

 

1,628 

 

3,051 

 

(174)

 

2004

 

11/18/2011

Health Clubs

 

Mission

 

TX

 

(f)

 

692 

 

2,408 

 

- 

 

49 

 

692 

 

2,457 

 

3,149 

 

(246)

 

2000

 

11/18/2011

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Owasso

 

OK

 

(f)

 

986 

 

3,926 

 

- 

 

- 

 

986 

 

3,926 

 

4,912 

 

(508)

 

1992

 

12/16/2011

Other Personal Services

 

Erlanger

 

KY

 

(f)

 

604 

 

1,809 

 

- 

 

- 

 

604 

 

1,809 

 

2,413 

 

(225)

 

2000

 

12/22/2011

Other Personal Services

 

Louisville

 

KY

 

(f)

 

492 

 

2,022 

 

- 

 

- 

 

492 

 

2,022 

 

2,514 

 

(234)

 

2003

 

12/22/2011

Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Manufacturing

 

Troy

 

MI

 

(f)

 

510 

 

2,388 

 

- 

 

- 

 

510 

 

2,388 

 

2,898 

 

(399)

 

1962

 

12/22/2011

Other Personal Services

 

Cincinnati

 

OH

 

(f)

 

547 

 

1,967 

 

- 

 

- 

 

547 

 

1,967 

 

2,514 

 

(240)

 

2005

 

12/22/2011

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Snyder

 

TX

 

(f)

 

177 

 

740 

 

- 

 

- 

 

177 

 

740 

 

917 

 

(95)

 

1974

 

12/22/2011

Basic Chemical Manufacturing

 

Elk Grove Village

 

IL

 

(f)

 

854 

 

1,460 

 

- 

 

- 

 

854 

 

1,460 

 

2,314 

 

(176)

 

1964

 

12/29/2011

Basic Chemical Manufacturing

 

Wheeling

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,463 

 

3,064 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,463 

 

3,064 

 

4,527 

 

(377)

 

1966

 

12/29/2011

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Vancouver

 

WA

 

(f)

 

1,644 

 

5,792 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,644 

 

5,792 

 

7,436 

 

(578)

 

2005

 

12/29/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Leadington

 

MO

 

(f)

 

494 

 

499 

 

- 

 

- 

 

494 

 

499 

 

993 

 

(75)

 

1978

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

St. Louis

 

MO

 

(f)

 

395 

 

393 

 

- 

 

- 

 

395 

 

393 

 

788 

 

(48)

 

1977

 

12/30/2011

Child Day Care Services

 

Blue Ash

 

OH

 

(f)

 

739 

 

2,464 

 

- 

 

- 

 

739 

 

2,464 

 

3,203 

 

(226)

 

1979

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Marietta

 

OH

 

(f)

 

435 

 

677 

 

- 

 

- 

 

435 

 

677 

 

1,112 

 

(99)

 

1986

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Salem

 

OH

 

(f)

 

205 

 

676 

 

- 

 

- 

 

205 

 

676 

 

881 

 

(87)

 

1969

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Warren

 

OH

 

(f)

 

328 

 

612 

 

- 

 

- 

 

328 

 

612 

 

940 

 

(87)

 

1988

 

12/30/2011

F-2


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

McKees Rocks

 

PA

 

(f)

 

556 

 

692 

 

- 

 

- 

 

556 

 

692 

 

1,248 

 

(92)

 

1984

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Pittsburgh

 

PA

 

(f)

 

364 

 

440 

 

- 

 

- 

 

364 

 

440 

 

804 

 

(57)

 

1989

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Clinton

 

TN

 

(f)

 

454 

 

653 

 

- 

 

- 

 

454 

 

653 

 

1,107 

 

(96)

 

1984

 

12/30/2011

Child Day Care Services

 

Franklin

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,782 

 

2,422 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,782 

 

2,422 

 

4,204 

 

(317)

 

2010

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Greeneville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

566 

 

491 

 

- 

 

- 

 

566 

 

491 

 

1,057 

 

(82)

 

1985

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

405 

 

702 

 

- 

 

- 

 

405 

 

702 

 

1,107 

 

(107)

 

1986

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

775 

 

734 

 

- 

 

- 

 

775 

 

734 

 

1,509 

 

(103)

 

1979

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Maryville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

542 

 

414 

 

45 

 

309 

 

587 

 

723 

 

1,310 

 

(81)

 

1983

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Newport

 

TN

 

(f)

 

484 

 

623 

 

- 

 

- 

 

484 

 

623 

 

1,107 

 

(103)

 

1987

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Wichita Falls

 

TX

 

(f)

 

198 

 

491 

 

- 

 

- 

 

198 

 

491 

 

689 

 

(68)

 

1984

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Wichita Falls

 

TX

 

(f)

 

253 

 

535 

 

- 

 

- 

 

253 

 

535 

 

788 

 

(76)

 

1986

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

New Martinsville

 

WV

 

(f)

 

269 

 

475 

 

- 

 

- 

 

269 

 

475 

 

744 

 

(65)

 

1978

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Parkersburg

 

WV

 

(f)

 

245 

 

461 

 

- 

 

- 

 

245 

 

461 

 

706 

 

(61)

 

1987

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Parkersburg

 

WV

 

(f)

 

769 

 

301 

 

- 

 

- 

 

769 

 

301 

 

1,070 

 

(50)

 

1986

 

12/30/2011

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Wheeling

 

WV

 

(f)

 

357 

 

714 

 

- 

 

- 

 

357 

 

714 

 

1,071 

 

(103)

 

1986

 

12/30/2011

Family Entertainment Centers

 

Frisco

 

TX

 

(f)

 

3,705 

 

5,109 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,705 

 

5,109 

 

8,814 

 

(509)

 

2008

 

01/27/2012

Family Entertainment Centers

 

Lubbock

 

TX

 

(f)

 

2,056 

 

6,658 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,056 

 

6,658 

 

8,714 

 

(652)

 

2007

 

01/27/2012

Junior Colleges

 

Fresno

 

CA

 

(f)

 

2,063 

 

1,984 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,063 

 

1,984 

 

4,047 

 

(274)

 

1966

 

02/29/2012

Junior Colleges

 

Rancho Cordova

 

CA

 

(f)

 

3,108 

 

3,587 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,108 

 

3,587 

 

6,695 

 

(406)

 

1984

 

02/29/2012

Junior Colleges

 

Roseville

 

CA

 

(f)

 

3,352 

 

5,941 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,352 

 

5,941 

 

9,293 

 

(638)

 

1999

 

02/29/2012

Junior Colleges

 

Milpitas

 

CA

 

12,326

 

5,749 

 

8,840 

 

- 

 

- 

 

5,749 

 

8,840 

 

14,589 

 

(785)

 

1987

 

02/29/2012

Junior Colleges

 

Stockton

 

CA

 

 

 

1,789 

 

3,557 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,789 

 

3,557 

 

5,346 

 

(428)

 

1990

 

02/29/2012

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Bethlehem

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,888 

 

5,168 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,888 

 

5,168 

 

7,056 

 

(432)

 

2011

 

03/15/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cherryville

 

NC

 

(f)

 

461 

 

650 

 

- 

 

- 

 

461 

 

650 

 

1,111 

 

(70)

 

2005

 

03/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Hudson

 

NC

 

(f)

 

215 

 

996 

 

- 

 

- 

 

215 

 

996 

 

1,211 

 

(82)

 

1984

 

03/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Maiden

 

NC

 

(f)

 

557 

 

533 

 

- 

 

- 

 

557 

 

533 

 

1,090 

 

(58)

 

1987

 

03/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Marion

 

NC

 

(f)

 

322 

 

637 

 

- 

 

- 

 

322 

 

637 

 

959 

 

(67)

 

1999

 

03/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Richfield

 

NC

 

(f)

 

361 

 

720 

 

- 

 

- 

 

361 

 

720 

 

1,081 

 

(76)

 

2007

 

03/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

West Jefferson

 

NC

 

(f)

 

357 

 

854 

 

- 

 

- 

 

357 

 

854 

 

1,211 

 

(88)

 

1996

 

03/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Naperville

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,869 

 

3,154 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,869 

 

3,154 

 

5,023 

 

(246)

 

2011

 

03/30/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Wheeling

 

IL

 

(f)

 

824 

 

2,441 

 

- 

 

- 

 

824 

 

2,441 

 

3,265 

 

(168)

 

2008

 

03/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Arlington

 

TX

 

(f)

 

183 

 

574 

 

- 

 

- 

 

183 

 

574 

 

757 

 

(88)

 

1984

 

03/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Cedar Hill

 

TX

 

(f)

 

285 

 

569 

 

- 

 

- 

 

285 

 

569 

 

854 

 

(88)

 

1984

 

03/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Grand Prairie

 

TX

 

(f)

 

292 

 

581 

 

- 

 

- 

 

292 

 

581 

 

873 

 

(91)

 

1985

 

03/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Haltom City

 

TX

 

(f)

 

362 

 

415 

 

- 

 

- 

 

362 

 

415 

 

777 

 

(64)

 

1985

 

03/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Watauga

 

TX

 

(f)

 

174 

 

622 

 

- 

 

- 

 

174 

 

622 

 

796 

 

(97)

 

1986

 

03/30/2012

Furniture Stores

 

Tacoma

 

WA

 

(f)

 

2,213 

 

3,319 

 

- 

 

817 

 

2,213 

 

4,136 

 

6,349 

 

(314)

 

1994

 

04/20/2012

Other Personal Services

 

Dayton

 

OH

 

(f)

 

574 

 

1,937 

 

- 

 

- 

 

574 

 

1,937 

 

2,511 

 

(201)

 

2008

 

04/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Tucson

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

2,674 

 

4,120 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,674 

 

4,120 

 

6,794 

 

(504)

 

2008

 

05/08/2012

Furniture Stores

 

Tucson

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

1,371 

 

4,170 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,371 

 

4,170 

 

5,541 

 

(392)

 

2003

 

05/10/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Troy

 

MI

 

(f)

 

1,503 

 

2,506 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,503 

 

2,506 

 

4,009 

 

(167)

 

2012

 

05/15/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Graham

 

TX

 

(f)

 

212 

 

581 

 

- 

 

- 

 

212 

 

581 

 

793 

 

(84)

 

1998

 

05/15/2012

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Ardmore

 

OK

 

(f)

 

1,302 

 

3,095 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,302 

 

3,095 

 

4,397 

 

(278)

 

2008

 

05/17/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Carrollton

 

GA

 

(f)

 

467 

 

627 

 

- 

 

- 

 

467 

 

627 

 

1,094 

 

(64)

 

1980

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cedartown

 

GA

 

(f)

 

319 

 

502 

 

- 

 

- 

 

319 

 

502 

 

821 

 

(53)

 

1981

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

College Park

 

GA

 

(f)

 

918 

 

227 

 

- 

 

- 

 

918 

 

227 

 

1,145 

 

(24)

 

1973

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Dalton

 

GA

 

(f)

 

337 

 

483 

 

- 

 

- 

 

337 

 

483 

 

820 

 

(51)

 

1980

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Decatur

 

GA

 

(f)

 

378 

 

484 

 

- 

 

- 

 

378 

 

484 

 

862 

 

(73)

 

1981

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Lithonia

 

GA

 

(f)

 

469 

 

706 

 

- 

 

- 

 

469 

 

706 

 

1,175 

 

(102)

 

1979

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Macon

 

GA

 

(f)

 

379 

 

716 

 

- 

 

- 

 

379 

 

716 

 

1,095 

 

(103)

 

1975

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

McDonough

 

GA

 

(f)

 

304 

 

719 

 

- 

 

- 

 

304 

 

719 

 

1,023 

 

(74)

 

2001

 

05/18/2012

F-3


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Riverdale

 

GA

 

(f)

 

241 

 

874 

 

- 

 

- 

 

241 

 

874 

 

1,115 

 

(126)

 

1976

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Savannah

 

GA

 

(f)

 

422 

 

946 

 

- 

 

- 

 

422 

 

946 

 

1,368 

 

(96)

 

1973

 

05/18/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Ooltewah

 

TN

 

(f)

 

458 

 

687 

 

- 

 

- 

 

458 

 

687 

 

1,145 

 

(70)

 

1999

 

05/18/2012

Health Clubs

 

Kansas City

 

MO

 

(f)

 

1,259 

 

895 

 

28 

 

1,510 

 

1,287 

 

2,405 

 

3,692 

 

(191)

 

2007

 

05/24/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Franklin

 

NC

 

(f)

 

573 

 

1,087 

 

- 

 

- 

 

573 

 

1,087 

 

1,660 

 

(123)

 

2008

 

05/24/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Morganton

 

NC

 

(f)

 

1,125 

 

708 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,125 

 

708 

 

1,833 

 

(76)

 

2002

 

05/24/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Rockingham

 

NC

 

(f)

 

1,111 

 

870 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,111 

 

870 

 

1,981 

 

(94)

 

2005

 

05/24/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Aiken

 

SC

 

(f)

 

1,009 

 

974 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,009 

 

974 

 

1,983 

 

(109)

 

2006

 

05/24/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Rock Hill

 

SC

 

(f)

 

1,121 

 

778 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,121 

 

778 

 

1,899 

 

(83)

 

2004

 

05/24/2012

Health Clubs

 

Richland

 

WA

 

(f)

 

1,758 

 

7,296 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,758 

 

7,296 

 

9,054 

 

(583)

 

2012

 

06/12/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Pearland

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,345 

 

6,257 

 

608 

 

2,542 

 

1,953 

 

8,799 

 

10,752 

 

(547)

 

2011

 

06/20/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Aiken

 

SC

 

(f)

 

547 

 

1,587 

 

- 

 

- 

 

547 

 

1,587 

 

2,134 

 

(134)

 

2009

 

06/21/2012

Health Clubs

 

Fairfield

 

CA

 

(f)

 

1,564 

 

1,949 

 

542 

 

1,758 

 

2,106 

 

3,707 

 

5,813 

 

(236)

 

1978

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Altamonte Springs

 

FL

 

(f)

 

438 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

438 

 

- 

 

438 

 

 

1978

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Apopka

 

FL

 

(f)

 

550 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

550 

 

- 

 

550 

 

 

1988

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Fort Pierce

 

FL

 

(f)

 

153 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

153 

 

- 

 

153 

 

 

1979

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

550 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

550 

 

- 

 

550 

 

 

1986

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

234 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

234 

 

- 

 

234 

 

 

1985

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

326 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

326 

 

- 

 

326 

 

 

1981

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

275 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

275 

 

- 

 

275 

 

 

1980

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

285 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

285 

 

- 

 

285 

 

 

1982

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Kissimmee

 

FL

 

(f)

 

601 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

601 

 

- 

 

601 

 

 

1981

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Lake City

 

FL

 

(f)

 

224 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

224 

 

- 

 

224 

 

 

1978

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Merritt Island

 

FL

 

(f)

 

316 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

316 

 

- 

 

316 

 

 

1983

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Orange Park

 

FL

 

(f)

 

326 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

326 

 

- 

 

326 

 

 

1985

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Orlando

 

FL

 

(f)

 

285 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

285 

 

- 

 

285 

 

 

1981

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Palatka

 

FL

 

(f)

 

1,110 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,110 

 

- 

 

1,110 

 

 

1997

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Plant City

 

FL

 

(f)

 

621 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

621 

 

- 

 

621 

 

 

1988

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Sanford

 

FL

 

(f)

 

407 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

407 

 

- 

 

407 

 

 

1986

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Tallahassee

 

FL

 

(f)

 

306 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

306 

 

- 

 

306 

 

 

1978

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Fairview Heights

 

IL

 

(f)

 

326 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

326 

 

- 

 

326 

 

 

1986

 

06/27/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

South Elgin

 

IL

 

(f)

 

574 

 

2,508 

 

- 

 

- 

 

574 

 

2,508 

 

3,082 

 

(186)

 

2009

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Monroe

 

LA

 

(f)

 

266 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

266 

 

- 

 

266 

 

 

1998

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

West Monroe

 

LA

 

(f)

 

511 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

511 

 

- 

 

511 

 

 

2000

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Brookhaven

 

MS

 

(f)

 

337 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

337 

 

- 

 

337 

 

 

1979

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Byram

 

MS

 

(f)

 

306 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

306 

 

- 

 

306 

 

 

1993

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Canton

 

MS

 

(f)

 

133 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

133 

 

- 

 

133 

 

 

1991

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Clarksdale

 

MS

 

(f)

 

276 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

276 

 

- 

 

276 

 

 

1979

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cleveland

 

MS

 

(f)

 

-

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

 

1991

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Clinton

 

MS

 

(f)

 

337 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

337 

 

- 

 

337 

 

 

1994

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

McComb

 

MS

 

(f)

 

337 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

337 

 

- 

 

337 

 

 

1985

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Starkville

 

MS

 

(f)

 

184 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

184 

 

- 

 

184 

 

 

1991

 

06/27/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Tupelo

 

MS

 

(f)

 

317 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

317 

 

- 

 

317 

 

 

1990

 

06/27/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Sicklerville

 

NJ

 

(f)

 

403 

 

2,527 

 

- 

 

- 

 

403 

 

2,527 

 

2,930 

 

(182)

 

2008

 

06/27/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Collegeville

 

PA

 

(f)

 

546 

 

2,182 

 

- 

 

- 

 

546 

 

2,182 

 

2,728 

 

(161)

 

2008

 

06/27/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Woodbridge

 

VA

 

(f)

 

777 

 

2,204 

 

219 

 

- 

 

996 

 

2,204 

 

3,200 

 

(225)

 

2002

 

06/27/2012

Grocery Stores

 

Alabaster

 

AL

 

 

 

487 

 

2,872 

 

- 

 

- 

 

487 

 

2,872 

 

3,359 

 

(267)

 

1985

 

06/29/2012

Grocery Stores

 

Atmore

 

AL

 

 

 

292 

 

1,568 

 

- 

 

- 

 

292 

 

1,568 

 

1,860 

 

(144)

 

1990

 

06/29/2012

Grocery Stores

 

Brewton

 

AL

 

 

 

234 

 

1,625 

 

- 

 

- 

 

234 

 

1,625 

 

1,859 

 

(149)

 

1990

 

06/29/2012

Grocery Stores

 

Enterprise

 

AL

 

 

 

744 

 

2,045 

 

- 

 

- 

 

744 

 

2,045 

 

2,789 

 

(206)

 

1987

 

06/29/2012

Grocery Stores

 

Luverne

 

AL

 

 

 

234 

 

1,425 

 

- 

 

- 

 

234 

 

1,425 

 

1,659 

 

(132)

 

1992

 

06/29/2012

F-4


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Grocery Stores

 

Muscle Shoals

 

AL

 

 

 

521 

 

2,089 

 

- 

 

- 

 

521 

 

2,089 

 

2,610 

 

(197)

 

1982

 

06/29/2012

Grocery Stores

 

Troy

 

AL

 

 

 

511 

 

2,209 

 

- 

 

- 

 

511 

 

2,209 

 

2,720 

 

(217)

 

1984

 

06/29/2012

Grocery Stores

 

Albany

 

GA

 

 

 

628 

 

2,571 

 

- 

 

- 

 

628 

 

2,571 

 

3,199 

 

(237)

 

1992

 

06/29/2012

Grocery Stores

 

Milledgeville

 

GA

 

 

 

652 

 

2,317 

 

- 

 

- 

 

652 

 

2,317 

 

2,969 

 

(218)

 

1994

 

06/29/2012

Other Motor Vehicle Dealers

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

5,451 

 

3,275 

 

438 

 

1,227 

 

5,889 

 

4,502 

 

10,391 

 

(1,019)

 

1997

 

06/29/2012

Health Clubs

 

Visalia

 

CA

 

3,326

 

1,382 

 

4,928 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,382 

 

4,928 

 

6,310 

 

(482)

 

1975

 

07/06/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Alpharetta

 

GA

 

(f)

 

866 

 

3,520 

 

- 

 

- 

 

866 

 

3,520 

 

4,386 

 

(310)

 

2001

 

07/17/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Newnan

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,114 

 

1,847 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,114 

 

1,847 

 

2,961 

 

(186)

 

2005

 

07/17/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Peachtree City

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,280 

 

1,750 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,280 

 

1,750 

 

3,030 

 

(196)

 

1999

 

07/17/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Suwanee

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,325 

 

1,954 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,325 

 

1,954 

 

3,279 

 

(191)

 

2006

 

07/17/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Suwanee

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,168 

 

1,624 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,168 

 

1,624 

 

2,792 

 

(170)

 

2005

 

07/17/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Huntersville

 

NC

 

(f)

 

1,654 

 

1,147 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,654 

 

1,147 

 

2,801 

 

(101)

 

2000

 

07/17/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

South St. Paul

 

MN

 

(f)

 

357 

 

498 

 

60 

 

240 

 

417 

 

738 

 

1,155 

 

(105)

 

1987

 

07/19/2012

Elementary and Secondary Schools

 

Scottsdale

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

3,729 

 

6,288 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,729 

 

6,288 

 

10,017 

 

(561)

 

1991

 

07/25/2012

Home Furnishings Stores

 

Dayton

 

OH

 

(f)

 

369 

 

1,318 

 

- 

 

- 

 

369 

 

1,318 

 

1,687 

 

(127)

 

1996

 

07/26/2012

Home Furnishings Stores

 

Fairborn

 

OH

 

(f)

 

418 

 

872 

 

- 

 

- 

 

418 

 

872 

 

1,290 

 

(83)

 

2006

 

07/26/2012

Home Furnishings Stores

 

Heath

 

OH

 

(f)

 

818 

 

1,171 

 

- 

 

- 

 

818 

 

1,171 

 

1,989 

 

(100)

 

2004

 

07/26/2012

Other Personal Services

 

Columbus

 

OH

 

(f)

 

853 

 

1,655 

 

- 

 

- 

 

853 

 

1,655 

 

2,508 

 

(174)

 

2012

 

07/27/2012

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Corpus Christi

 

TX

 

 

 

5,954 

 

9,373 

 

- 

 

- 

 

5,954 

 

9,373 

 

15,327 

 

(1,188)

 

1995

 

08/21/2012

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Forney

 

TX

 

 

 

2,740 

 

2,904 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,740 

 

2,904 

 

5,644 

 

(292)

 

2006

 

08/21/2012

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Fort Worth

 

TX

 

24,805

 

3,105 

 

7,677 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,105 

 

7,677 

 

10,782 

 

(744)

 

2010

 

08/21/2012

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Irving

 

TX

 

 

 

1,976 

 

1,172 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,976 

 

1,172 

 

3,148 

 

(150)

 

1995

 

08/21/2012

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Rio Grande City

 

TX

 

 

 

1,933 

 

3,196 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,933 

 

3,196 

 

5,129 

 

(316)

 

2008

 

08/21/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Hancock

 

MD

 

(f)

 

490 

 

347 

 

- 

 

- 

 

490 

 

347 

 

837 

 

(44)

 

1987

 

08/29/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Chambersburg

 

PA

 

(f)

 

539 

 

666 

 

- 

 

- 

 

539 

 

666 

 

1,205 

 

(70)

 

1989

 

08/29/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Greencastle

 

PA

 

(f)

 

767 

 

638 

 

- 

 

- 

 

767 

 

638 

 

1,405 

 

(70)

 

1986

 

08/29/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Gilbert

 

AZ

 

 

 

453 

 

1,639 

 

- 

 

- 

 

453 

 

1,639 

 

2,092 

 

(111)

 

1996

 

08/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Gilbert

 

AZ

 

6,207

 

393 

 

1,699 

 

- 

 

- 

 

393 

 

1,699 

 

2,092 

 

(110)

 

2002

 

08/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Phoenix

 

AZ

 

 

 

877 

 

2,311 

 

- 

 

- 

 

877 

 

2,311 

 

3,188 

 

(177)

 

2003

 

08/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Phoenix

 

AZ

 

 

 

595 

 

2,094 

 

- 

 

- 

 

595 

 

2,094 

 

2,689 

 

(148)

 

2006

 

08/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Plainfield

 

IL

 

(f)

 

390 

 

699 

 

- 

 

- 

 

390 

 

699 

 

1,089 

 

(62)

 

2008

 

09/07/2012

Other Motor Vehicle Dealers

 

Garner

 

NC

 

(f)

 

2,163 

 

342 

 

329 

 

2,938 

 

2,492 

 

3,280 

 

5,772 

 

(148)

 

1997

 

09/13/2012

Other Motor Vehicle Dealers

 

Hope Mills

 

NC

 

(f)

 

1,462 

 

1,437 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,462 

 

1,437 

 

2,899 

 

(183)

 

1993

 

09/13/2012

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Savoy

 

IL

 

(f)

 

2,764 

 

3,552 

 

212 

 

5,787 

 

2,976 

 

9,339 

 

12,315 

 

(492)

 

1990

 

09/25/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lumberton

 

NC

 

(f)

 

676 

 

451 

 

- 

 

- 

 

676 

 

451 

 

1,127 

 

(45)

 

1999

 

09/25/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Morehead City

 

NC

 

(f)

 

559 

 

507 

 

- 

 

- 

 

559 

 

507 

 

1,066 

 

(51)

 

1995

 

09/25/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Morrisville

 

NC

 

(f)

 

891 

 

235 

 

- 

 

- 

 

891 

 

235 

 

1,126 

 

(28)

 

1999

 

09/25/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Roanoke Rapids

 

NC

 

(f)

 

464 

 

471 

 

- 

 

- 

 

464 

 

471 

 

935 

 

(46)

 

1998

 

09/25/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Rocky Mount

 

NC

 

(f)

 

593 

 

403 

 

- 

 

- 

 

593 

 

403 

 

996 

 

(42)

 

1994

 

09/25/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Smithfield

 

NC

 

(f)

 

702 

 

384 

 

- 

 

- 

 

702 

 

384 

 

1,086 

 

(44)

 

1998

 

09/25/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Wilson

 

NC

 

(f)

 

631 

 

304 

 

- 

 

- 

 

631 

 

304 

 

935 

 

(33)

 

2001

 

09/25/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Charleston

 

WV

 

(f)

 

496 

 

399 

 

- 

 

- 

 

496 

 

399 

 

895 

 

(40)

 

2004

 

09/25/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Columbus

 

OH

 

(f)

 

937 

 

1,135 

 

- 

 

- 

 

937 

 

1,135 

 

2,072 

 

(105)

 

1992

 

09/28/2012

Furniture Stores

 

Fairfield

 

CA

 

6,127

 

2,618 

 

2,633 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,618 

 

2,633 

 

5,251 

 

(217)

 

2006

 

10/01/2012

Furniture Stores

 

Rohnert Park

 

CA

 

 

 

2,115 

 

3,362 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,115 

 

3,362 

 

5,477 

 

(272)

 

2006

 

10/01/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Oak Creek

 

WI

 

(f)

 

781 

 

1,657 

 

- 

 

- 

 

781 

 

1,657 

 

2,438 

 

(126)

 

2009

 

10/02/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Wheeling

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,116 

 

1,090 

 

31 

 

469 

 

1,147 

 

1,559 

 

2,706 

 

(130)

 

2007

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Auburn

 

IN

 

(f)

 

750 

 

1,420 

 

- 

 

- 

 

750 

 

1,420 

 

2,170 

 

(140)

 

2000

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fort Wayne

 

IN

 

(f)

 

946 

 

1,335 

 

- 

 

- 

 

946 

 

1,335 

 

2,281 

 

(120)

 

1993

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fort Wayne

 

IN

 

(f)

 

964 

 

1,337 

 

- 

 

- 

 

964 

 

1,337 

 

2,301 

 

(118)

 

1993

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fort Wayne

 

IN

 

(f)

 

1,239 

 

1,614 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,239 

 

1,614 

 

2,853 

 

(136)

 

2002

 

10/05/2012

F-5


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Goshen

 

IN

 

(f)

 

639 

 

1,451 

 

- 

 

- 

 

639 

 

1,451 

 

2,090 

 

(140)

 

1999

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Granger

 

IN

 

(f)

 

778 

 

1,222 

 

- 

 

- 

 

778 

 

1,222 

 

2,000 

 

(115)

 

1995

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Portage

 

IN

 

(f)

 

555 

 

1,374 

 

- 

 

- 

 

555 

 

1,374 

 

1,929 

 

(129)

 

1999

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Schererville

 

IN

 

(f)

 

543 

 

1,356 

 

- 

 

- 

 

543 

 

1,356 

 

1,899 

 

(123)

 

1992

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

South Bend

 

IN

 

(f)

 

675 

 

1,394 

 

- 

 

- 

 

675 

 

1,394 

 

2,069 

 

(130)

 

1999

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Valparaiso

 

IN

 

(f)

 

507 

 

1,502 

 

- 

 

- 

 

507 

 

1,502 

 

2,009 

 

(137)

 

1995

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fremont

 

OH

 

(f)

 

728 

 

1,443 

 

- 

 

- 

 

728 

 

1,443 

 

2,171 

 

(130)

 

2000

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lima

 

OH

 

(f)

 

765 

 

1,576 

 

- 

 

- 

 

765 

 

1,576 

 

2,341 

 

(138)

 

1996

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lima

 

OH

 

(f)

 

755 

 

1,536 

 

- 

 

- 

 

755 

 

1,536 

 

2,291 

 

(135)

 

2005

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Maumee

 

OH

 

(f)

 

657 

 

1,684 

 

- 

 

- 

 

657 

 

1,684 

 

2,341 

 

(148)

 

1995

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Northwood

 

OH

 

(f)

 

615 

 

1,716 

 

- 

 

- 

 

615 

 

1,716 

 

2,331 

 

(151)

 

2004

 

10/05/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Toledo

 

OH

 

(f)

 

754 

 

1,587 

 

- 

 

- 

 

754 

 

1,587 

 

2,341 

 

(146)

 

1995

 

10/05/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Bradenton

 

FL

 

(f)

 

545 

 

2,149 

 

- 

 

- 

 

545 

 

2,149 

 

2,694 

 

(190)

 

1982

 

10/19/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

(f)

 

504 

 

3,959 

 

- 

 

- 

 

504 

 

3,959 

 

4,463 

 

(237)

 

1886

 

10/29/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

(f)

 

900 

 

2,410 

 

- 

 

- 

 

900 

 

2,410 

 

3,310 

 

(195)

 

1923

 

10/29/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

(f)

 

810 

 

5,559 

 

- 

 

- 

 

810 

 

5,559 

 

6,369 

 

(329)

 

2008

 

10/29/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Baton Rouge

 

LA

 

(f)

 

700 

 

162 

 

- 

 

- 

 

700 

 

162 

 

862 

 

(21)

 

2005

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Baton Rouge

 

LA

 

(f)

 

741 

 

212 

 

- 

 

- 

 

741 

 

212 

 

953 

 

(30)

 

2005

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Breaux Bridge

 

LA

 

(f)

 

678 

 

643 

 

- 

 

- 

 

678 

 

643 

 

1,321 

 

(93)

 

1996

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Denham

 

LA

 

(f)

 

831 

 

444 

 

- 

 

- 

 

831 

 

444 

 

1,275 

 

(60)

 

2001

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Donaldsonville

 

LA

 

(f)

 

327 

 

562 

 

- 

 

- 

 

327 

 

562 

 

889 

 

(72)

 

1981

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Gonzales

 

LA

 

(f)

 

547 

 

599 

 

- 

 

- 

 

547 

 

599 

 

1,146 

 

(70)

 

1981

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Gonzales

 

LA

 

(f)

 

617 

 

419 

 

- 

 

- 

 

617 

 

419 

 

1,036 

 

(54)

 

1996

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Kentwood

 

LA

 

(f)

 

243 

 

600 

 

- 

 

- 

 

243 

 

600 

 

843 

 

(57)

 

2006

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Larose

 

LA

 

(f)

 

418 

 

756 

 

- 

 

- 

 

418 

 

756 

 

1,174 

 

(102)

 

1986

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Port Vincent

 

LA

 

(f)

 

692 

 

207 

 

- 

 

- 

 

692 

 

207 

 

899 

 

(24)

 

2006

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Prairieville

 

LA

 

(f)

 

724 

 

165 

 

- 

 

- 

 

724 

 

165 

 

889 

 

(32)

 

1995

 

11/09/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Walker

 

LA

 

(f)

 

508 

 

776 

 

- 

 

- 

 

508 

 

776 

 

1,284 

 

(106)

 

2001

 

11/09/2012

Other Schools and Instruction

 

Denver

 

CO

 

7,468

 

5,201 

 

8,925 

 

- 

 

- 

 

5,201 

 

8,925 

 

14,126 

 

(620)

 

1962

 

11/21/2012

Scientific Research and Development Services

 

Columbia

 

MO

 

11,478

 

807 

 

13,794 

 

- 

 

- 

 

807 

 

13,794 

 

14,601 

 

(687)

 

2008

 

11/29/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Orland Park

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,267 

 

4,320 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,267 

 

4,320 

 

5,587 

 

(243)

 

2005

 

11/30/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Cincinnati

 

OH

 

(f)

 

1,074 

 

1,610 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,074 

 

1,610 

 

2,684 

 

(137)

 

2001

 

12/10/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Powell

 

OH

 

(f)

 

1,102 

 

1,602 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,102 

 

1,602 

 

2,704 

 

(136)

 

1998

 

12/10/2012

Child Day Care Services

 

Manassas

 

VA

 

(f)

 

938 

 

2,580 

 

- 

 

- 

 

938 

 

2,580 

 

3,518 

 

(199)

 

2005

 

12/10/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Dalton

 

GA

 

(f)

 

418 

 

1,133 

 

- 

 

- 

 

418 

 

1,133 

 

1,551 

 

(90)

 

1984

 

12/11/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Chattanooga

 

TN

 

(f)

 

426 

 

984 

 

- 

 

- 

 

426 

 

984 

 

1,410 

 

(80)

 

1984

 

12/11/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

East Ridge

 

TN

 

(f)

 

481 

 

807 

 

- 

 

- 

 

481 

 

807 

 

1,288 

 

(68)

 

1982

 

12/11/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Abilene

 

TX

 

(f)

 

593 

 

2,023 

 

- 

 

- 

 

593 

 

2,023 

 

2,616 

 

(172)

 

1961

 

12/11/2012

Furniture Stores

 

Lancaster

 

PA

 

(f)

 

1,034 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,034 

 

- 

 

1,034 

 

 

1999

 

12/13/2012

Furniture Stores

 

Wilkes Barre

 

PA

 

(f)

 

827 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

827 

 

- 

 

827 

 

 

1997

 

12/13/2012

Health Clubs

 

Mesa

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

1,112 

 

3,684 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,112 

 

3,684 

 

4,796 

 

(219)

 

2003

 

12/20/2012

Health Clubs

 

Scottsdale

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

2,029 

 

4,716 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,029 

 

4,716 

 

6,745 

 

(299)

 

2003

 

12/20/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Champaign

 

IL

 

(f)

 

931 

 

854 

 

- 

 

- 

 

931 

 

854 

 

1,785 

 

(65)

 

2004

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Decatur

 

IL

 

(f)

 

559 

 

615 

 

- 

 

- 

 

559 

 

615 

 

1,174 

 

(51)

 

2005

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Dekalb

 

IL

 

(f)

 

615 

 

747 

 

- 

 

- 

 

615 

 

747 

 

1,362 

 

(71)

 

2000

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Effingham

 

IL

 

(f)

 

514 

 

717 

 

- 

 

- 

 

514 

 

717 

 

1,231 

 

(60)

 

2003

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Morton

 

IL

 

(f)

 

554 

 

856 

 

- 

 

- 

 

554 

 

856 

 

1,410 

 

(83)

 

1999

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Rockford

 

IL

 

(f)

 

925 

 

250 

 

- 

 

- 

 

925 

 

250 

 

1,175 

 

(25)

 

1999

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Skokie

 

IL

 

(f)

 

737 

 

1,189 

 

- 

 

- 

 

737 

 

1,189 

 

1,926 

 

(96)

 

2000

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Clarksville

 

IN

 

(f)

 

813 

 

1,369 

 

- 

 

- 

 

813 

 

1,369 

 

2,182 

 

(120)

 

1978

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Merrillville

 

IN

 

(f)

 

981 

 

1,795 

 

- 

 

- 

 

981 

 

1,795 

 

2,776 

 

(164)

 

1979

 

12/27/2012

F-6


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Emporia

 

KS

 

(f)

 

730 

 

1,542 

 

- 

 

- 

 

730 

 

1,542 

 

2,272 

 

(160)

 

1998

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Topeka

 

KS

 

(f)

 

783 

 

2,054 

 

- 

 

- 

 

783 

 

2,054 

 

2,837 

 

(211)

 

1992

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Florence

 

KY

 

(f)

 

1,161 

 

1,290 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,161 

 

1,290 

 

2,451 

 

(157)

 

2004

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Louisville

 

KY

 

(f)

 

1,127 

 

1,577 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,127 

 

1,577 

 

2,704 

 

(152)

 

1973

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Louisville

 

KY

 

(f)

 

1,122 

 

1,415 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,122 

 

1,415 

 

2,537 

 

(140)

 

1974

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Maryville

 

MO

 

(f)

 

682 

 

1,727 

 

- 

 

- 

 

682 

 

1,727 

 

2,409 

 

(151)

 

2005

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Columbus

 

NE

 

(f)

 

628 

 

1,401 

 

- 

 

- 

 

628 

 

1,401 

 

2,029 

 

(99)

 

2002

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Grand Island

 

NE

 

(f)

 

749 

 

1,922 

 

- 

 

- 

 

749 

 

1,922 

 

2,671 

 

(136)

 

1999

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Kearney

 

NE

 

(f)

 

718 

 

2,236 

 

- 

 

- 

 

718 

 

2,236 

 

2,954 

 

(158)

 

2002

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lincoln

 

NE

 

(f)

 

672 

 

1,539 

 

- 

 

- 

 

672 

 

1,539 

 

2,211 

 

(123)

 

1993

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lincoln

 

NE

 

(f)

 

726 

 

1,775 

 

- 

 

- 

 

726 

 

1,775 

 

2,501 

 

(125)

 

1999

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Dayton

 

OH

 

(f)

 

960 

 

1,088 

 

- 

 

- 

 

960 

 

1,088 

 

2,048 

 

(141)

 

2003

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Ada

 

OK

 

1,639

 

1,252 

 

1,438 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,252 

 

1,438 

 

2,690 

 

(112)

 

2006

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Altus

 

OK

 

1,145

 

732 

 

1,147 

 

- 

 

- 

 

732 

 

1,147 

 

1,879 

 

(91)

 

2005

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Ardmore

 

OK

 

(f)

 

946 

 

1,539 

 

- 

 

- 

 

946 

 

1,539 

 

2,485 

 

(131)

 

1998

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lawton

 

OK

 

1,328

 

923 

 

1,258 

 

- 

 

- 

 

923 

 

1,258 

 

2,181 

 

(123)

 

1996

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Goodlettsville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

969 

 

1,616 

 

- 

 

- 

 

969 

 

1,616 

 

2,585 

 

(173)

 

1973

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Memphis

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,244 

 

1,580 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,244 

 

1,580 

 

2,824 

 

(165)

 

2002

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Nashville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

979 

 

1,319 

 

- 

 

- 

 

979 

 

1,319 

 

2,298 

 

(140)

 

1978

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Nashville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

626 

 

2,270 

 

- 

 

- 

 

626 

 

2,270 

 

2,896 

 

(165)

 

1910

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Amarillo

 

TX

 

1,333

 

927 

 

1,330 

 

- 

 

- 

 

927 

 

1,330 

 

2,257 

 

(127)

 

1995

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lubbock

 

TX

 

1,239

 

1,289 

 

808 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,289 

 

808 

 

2,097 

 

(79)

 

1994

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Evansville

 

WY

 

(f)

 

932 

 

1,569 

 

- 

 

- 

 

932 

 

1,569 

 

2,501 

 

(133)

 

1999

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Gillette

 

WY

 

(f)

 

1,322 

 

1,990 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,322 

 

1,990 

 

3,312 

 

(169)

 

2001

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Laramie

 

WY

 

(f)

 

923 

 

1,081 

 

- 

 

- 

 

923 

 

1,081 

 

2,004 

 

(90)

 

1996

 

12/27/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Omaha

 

NE

 

(f)

 

920 

 

1,324 

 

- 

 

- 

 

920 

 

1,324 

 

2,244 

 

(112)

 

2005

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Edmond

 

OK

 

(f)

 

371 

 

294 

 

- 

 

- 

 

371 

 

294 

 

665 

 

(32)

 

1990

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

507 

 

556 

 

- 

 

- 

 

507 

 

556 

 

1,063 

 

(67)

 

1999

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

186 

 

390 

 

- 

 

- 

 

186 

 

390 

 

576 

 

(39)

 

1984

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

500 

 

603 

 

- 

 

- 

 

500 

 

603 

 

1,103 

 

(67)

 

1968

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

398 

 

427 

 

- 

 

- 

 

398 

 

427 

 

825 

 

(45)

 

1995

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

291 

 

385 

 

- 

 

- 

 

291 

 

385 

 

676 

 

(43)

 

1997

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

271 

 

404 

 

- 

 

- 

 

271 

 

404 

 

675 

 

(51)

 

2000

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Yukon

 

OK

 

(f)

 

408 

 

426 

 

- 

 

- 

 

408 

 

426 

 

834 

 

(53)

 

2002

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Bartlett

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,182 

 

1,297 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,182 

 

1,297 

 

2,479 

 

(121)

 

1998

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Huntingdon

 

TN

 

(f)

 

132 

 

956 

 

- 

 

- 

 

132 

 

956 

 

1,088 

 

(45)

 

1989

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Paris

 

TN

 

(f)

 

383 

 

686 

 

- 

 

- 

 

383 

 

686 

 

1,069 

 

(46)

 

1981

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Richlands

 

VA

 

(f)

 

275 

 

1,023 

 

- 

 

- 

 

275 

 

1,023 

 

1,298 

 

(62)

 

1990

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Wise

 

VA

 

(f)

 

371 

 

1,207 

 

- 

 

- 

 

371 

 

1,207 

 

1,578 

 

(61)

 

1983

 

12/28/2012

Other Motor Vehicle Dealers

 

Liberty Lake

 

WA

 

(f)

 

2,458 

 

2,687 

 

1,355 

 

- 

 

3,813 

 

2,687 

 

6,500 

 

(294)

 

2006

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Welch

 

WV

 

(f)

 

542 

 

997 

 

- 

 

- 

 

542 

 

997 

 

1,539 

 

(60)

 

1984

 

12/28/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Jonesboro

 

GA

 

(f)

 

477 

 

664 

 

- 

 

- 

 

477 

 

664 

 

1,141 

 

(62)

 

2000

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lawrenceville

 

GA

 

(f)

 

675 

 

447 

 

- 

 

- 

 

675 

 

447 

 

1,122 

 

(42)

 

2000

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Altoona

 

IA

 

(f)

 

368 

 

468 

 

- 

 

- 

 

368 

 

468 

 

836 

 

(36)

 

1995

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Ankeny

 

IA

 

(f)

 

423 

 

474 

 

- 

 

- 

 

423 

 

474 

 

897 

 

(44)

 

1986

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Boone

 

IA

 

(f)

 

308 

 

538 

 

- 

 

- 

 

308 

 

538 

 

846 

 

(38)

 

1974

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Des Moines

 

IA

 

(f)

 

419 

 

901 

 

- 

 

- 

 

419 

 

901 

 

1,320 

 

(65)

 

2003

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Des Moines

 

IA

 

(f)

 

382 

 

555 

 

- 

 

- 

 

382 

 

555 

 

937 

 

(49)

 

2008

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Des Moines

 

IA

 

(f)

 

250 

 

536 

 

- 

 

- 

 

250 

 

536 

 

786 

 

(47)

 

1991

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

West Des Moines

 

IA

 

(f)

 

366 

 

652 

 

- 

 

- 

 

366 

 

652 

 

1,018 

 

(48)

 

2010

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

West Des Moines

 

IA

 

(f)

 

490 

 

628 

 

- 

 

- 

 

490 

 

628 

 

1,118 

 

(47)

 

1995

 

12/31/2012

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fishers

 

IN

 

(f)

 

750 

 

1,622 

 

- 

 

440 

 

750 

 

2,062 

 

2,812 

 

(134)

 

2004

 

01/03/2013

F-7


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fishers

 

IN

 

(f)

 

730 

 

1,181 

 

 

- 

 

738 

 

1,181 

 

1,919 

 

(78)

 

2009

 

01/03/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Greenwood

 

IN

 

(f)

 

1,418 

 

1,194 

 

- 

 

164 

 

1,418 

 

1,358 

 

2,776 

 

(156)

 

2007

 

01/03/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lafayette

 

IN

 

(f)

 

679 

 

1,953 

 

198 

 

388 

 

877 

 

2,341 

 

3,218 

 

(136)

 

2006

 

01/03/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Columbus

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,127 

 

1,251 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,127 

 

1,251 

 

2,378 

 

(125)

 

1997

 

01/10/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Greenwood

 

IN

 

(f)

 

945 

 

1,324 

 

- 

 

- 

 

945 

 

1,324 

 

2,269 

 

(126)

 

2001

 

01/10/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Indianapolis

 

IN

 

(f)

 

889 

 

1,489 

 

- 

 

- 

 

889 

 

1,489 

 

2,378 

 

(141)

 

1999

 

01/10/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Plainfield

 

IN

 

(f)

 

853 

 

1,120 

 

- 

 

- 

 

853 

 

1,120 

 

1,973 

 

(103)

 

1999

 

01/10/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cleveland

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,143 

 

1,366 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,143 

 

1,366 

 

2,509 

 

(146)

 

1999

 

01/10/2013

Health Clubs

 

North Las Vegas

 

NV

 

(f)

 

1,609 

 

6,621 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,609 

 

6,621 

 

8,230 

 

(343)

 

2009

 

01/17/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Peoria

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

510 

 

1,630 

 

- 

 

- 

 

510 

 

1,630 

 

2,140 

 

(113)

 

2003

 

01/22/2013

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Mount Airy

 

NC

 

(f)

 

1,053 

 

3,141 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,053 

 

3,141 

 

4,194 

 

(249)

 

2000

 

01/24/2013

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Sanford

 

NC

 

(f)

 

1,146 

 

4,245 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,146 

 

4,245 

 

5,391 

 

(268)

 

2004

 

01/24/2013

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Shallotte

 

NC

 

(f)

 

1,239 

 

3,353 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,239 

 

3,353 

 

4,592 

 

(204)

 

2003

 

01/24/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fort Wayne

 

IN

 

(f)

 

843 

 

1,018 

 

- 

 

- 

 

843 

 

1,018 

 

1,861 

 

(76)

 

1998

 

01/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lafayette

 

IN

 

(f)

 

782 

 

1,812 

 

- 

 

- 

 

782 

 

1,812 

 

2,594 

 

(152)

 

1999

 

01/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Wichita

 

KS

 

(f)

 

882 

 

1,594 

 

- 

 

- 

 

882 

 

1,594 

 

2,476 

 

(100)

 

2006

 

01/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Nebraska City

 

NE

 

(f)

 

259 

 

717 

 

- 

 

- 

 

259 

 

717 

 

976 

 

(64)

 

1989

 

01/31/2013

Electronics and Appliance Stores

 

Las Cruces

 

NM

 

(f)

 

1,350 

 

4,043 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,350 

 

4,043 

 

5,393 

 

(222)

 

1981

 

01/31/2013

Electronics and Appliance Stores

 

Houston

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,538 

 

4,829 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,538 

 

4,829 

 

6,367 

 

(269)

 

2007

 

01/31/2013

Electronics and Appliance Stores

 

McAllen

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,321 

 

2,917 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,321 

 

2,917 

 

4,238 

 

(164)

 

2006

 

01/31/2013

Electronics and Appliance Stores

 

Mesquite

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,795 

 

5,838 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,795 

 

5,838 

 

7,633 

 

(299)

 

1973

 

01/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

San Angelo

 

TX

 

(f)

 

913 

 

2,057 

 

- 

 

- 

 

913 

 

2,057 

 

2,970 

 

(128)

 

2000

 

01/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Marietta

 

GA

 

(f)

 

728 

 

98 

 

 

129 

 

736 

 

227 

 

963 

 

(15)

 

1984

 

02/05/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Norcross

 

GA

 

(f)

 

499 

 

190 

 

 

31 

 

501 

 

221 

 

722 

 

(19)

 

1999

 

02/05/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Norcross

 

GA

 

(f)

 

687 

 

351 

 

 

92 

 

692 

 

443 

 

1,135 

 

(35)

 

1996

 

02/05/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Stockbridge

 

GA

 

(f)

 

704 

 

1,274 

 

 

104 

 

710 

 

1,378 

 

2,088 

 

(107)

 

1996

 

02/05/2013

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Lewisville

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,330 

 

3,294 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,330 

 

3,294 

 

4,624 

 

(265)

 

1994

 

02/08/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Lehi

 

UT

 

(f)

 

682 

 

1,441 

 

- 

 

- 

 

682 

 

1,441 

 

2,123 

 

(121)

 

2008

 

02/14/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Charlotte

 

NC

 

(f)

 

997 

 

109 

 

- 

 

- 

 

997 

 

109 

 

1,106 

 

(14)

 

2005

 

02/27/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Charlotte

 

NC

 

(f)

 

978 

 

128 

 

- 

 

- 

 

978 

 

128 

 

1,106 

 

(17)

 

2007

 

02/27/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Gastonia

 

NC

 

(f)

 

703 

 

244 

 

- 

 

- 

 

703 

 

244 

 

947 

 

(30)

 

2004

 

02/27/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Indian Trail

 

NC

 

(f)

 

830 

 

78 

 

- 

 

- 

 

830 

 

78 

 

908 

 

(11)

 

2003

 

02/27/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Lincolnton

 

NC

 

(f)

 

572 

 

60 

 

- 

 

- 

 

572 

 

60 

 

632 

 

(7)

 

2005

 

02/27/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Mooresville

 

NC

 

(f)

 

874 

 

34 

 

- 

 

- 

 

874 

 

34 

 

908 

 

(5)

 

2002

 

02/27/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Morganton

 

NC

 

(f)

 

703 

 

28 

 

- 

 

- 

 

703 

 

28 

 

731 

 

(4)

 

2003

 

02/27/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Newton

 

NC

 

(f)

 

594 

 

403 

 

- 

 

- 

 

594 

 

403 

 

997 

 

(54)

 

2002

 

02/27/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Shelby

 

NC

 

(f)

 

395 

 

59 

 

- 

 

- 

 

395 

 

59 

 

454 

 

(9)

 

2004

 

02/27/2013

Home Furnishings Stores

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

2,898 

 

5,889 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,898 

 

5,889 

 

8,787 

 

(453)

 

1995

 

03/15/2013

Home Furnishings Stores

 

Tulsa

 

OK

 

(f)

 

3,406 

 

5,373 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,406 

 

5,373 

 

8,779 

 

(445)

 

1996

 

03/15/2013

Furniture Stores

 

Goodyear

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

2,112 

 

4,111 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,112 

 

4,111 

 

6,223 

 

(247)

 

2005

 

03/26/2013

Furniture Stores

 

Prescott

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

1,937 

 

3,216 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,937 

 

3,216 

 

5,153 

 

(186)

 

2007

 

03/26/2013

Foundries

 

Fayetteville

 

AR

 

(f)

 

968 

 

2,227 

 

- 

 

- 

 

968 

 

2,227 

 

3,195 

 

(133)

 

2005

 

03/28/2013

Foundries

 

Harrison

 

AR

 

(f)

 

224 

 

1,322 

 

- 

 

- 

 

224 

 

1,322 

 

1,546 

 

(89)

 

1998

 

03/28/2013

Foundries

 

Harrison

 

AR

 

(f)

 

920 

 

2,378 

 

- 

 

- 

 

920 

 

2,378 

 

3,298 

 

(221)

 

1950

 

03/28/2013

Foundries

 

Harrison

 

AR

 

(f)

 

211 

 

1,438 

 

- 

 

- 

 

211 

 

1,438 

 

1,649 

 

(93)

 

1988

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Arvada

 

CO

 

(f)

 

860 

 

1,303 

 

- 

 

- 

 

860 

 

1,303 

 

2,163 

 

(88)

 

2001

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Ashland

 

KY

 

(f)

 

1,224 

 

1,986 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,224 

 

1,986 

 

3,210 

 

(152)

 

1996

 

03/28/2013

Foundries

 

Chelmsford

 

MA

 

(f)

 

542 

 

571 

 

- 

 

- 

 

542 

 

571 

 

1,113 

 

(104)

 

1963

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Ironwood

 

MI

 

(f)

 

171 

 

415 

 

- 

 

- 

 

171 

 

415 

 

586 

 

(28)

 

1999

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Ishpeming

 

MI

 

(f)

 

384 

 

597 

 

- 

 

- 

 

384 

 

597 

 

981 

 

(41)

 

1999

 

03/28/2013

Foundries

 

Arden Hills

 

MN

 

(f)

 

1,176 

 

1,359 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,176 

 

1,359 

 

2,535 

 

(135)

 

1964

 

03/28/2013

Foundries

 

St. Charles

 

MO

 

(f)

 

988 

 

825 

 

- 

 

- 

 

988 

 

825 

 

1,813 

 

(55)

 

1995

 

03/28/2013

F-8


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Lillington

 

NC

 

(f)

 

188 

 

377 

 

- 

 

- 

 

188 

 

377 

 

565 

 

(25)

 

1970

 

03/28/2013

Foundries

 

Dover

 

NH

 

(f)

 

1,125 

 

1,688 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,125 

 

1,688 

 

2,813 

 

(162)

 

1970

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Clayton

 

OH

 

(f)

 

704 

 

769 

 

- 

 

- 

 

704 

 

769 

 

1,473 

 

(55)

 

2004

 

03/28/2013

Foundries

 

Loyalhanna

 

PA

 

(f)

 

237 

 

1,928 

 

- 

 

- 

 

237 

 

1,928 

 

2,165 

 

(114)

 

1989

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jefferson City

 

TN

 

(f)

 

450 

 

440 

 

- 

 

- 

 

450 

 

440 

 

890 

 

(30)

 

1988

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Manchester

 

TN

 

(f)

 

478 

 

419 

 

172 

 

290 

 

650 

 

709 

 

1,359 

 

(46)

 

1980

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cleburne

 

TX

 

(f)

 

195 

 

726 

 

- 

 

- 

 

195 

 

726 

 

921 

 

(50)

 

1977

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Houston

 

TX

 

(f)

 

912 

 

913 

 

- 

 

- 

 

912 

 

913 

 

1,825 

 

(63)

 

1988

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cross Lanes

 

WV

 

(f)

 

1,490 

 

2,067 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,490 

 

2,067 

 

3,557 

 

(172)

 

1999

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Huntington

 

WV

 

(f)

 

1,042 

 

2,287 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,042 

 

2,287 

 

3,329 

 

(175)

 

1997

 

03/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Parkersburg

 

WV

 

(f)

 

1,288 

 

2,428 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,288 

 

2,428 

 

3,716 

 

(185)

 

2004

 

03/28/2013

Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools

 

San Marcos

 

CA

 

17,091

 

4,528 

 

22,213 

 

- 

 

- 

 

4,528 

 

22,213 

 

26,741 

 

(879)

 

2008

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Wheat Ridge

 

CO

 

(f)

 

590 

 

211 

 

- 

 

- 

 

590 

 

211 

 

801 

 

(22)

 

1953

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Avon

 

CT

 

(f)

 

747 

 

215 

 

- 

 

- 

 

747 

 

215 

 

962 

 

(47)

 

1964

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Bethany

 

CT

 

(f)

 

257 

 

435 

 

- 

 

- 

 

257 

 

435 

 

692 

 

(83)

 

1970

 

03/29/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Snellville

 

GA

 

(f)

 

427 

 

1,005 

 

 

64 

 

431 

 

1,069 

 

1,500 

 

(77)

 

1985

 

03/29/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Stone Mountain

 

GA

 

(f)

 

894 

 

1,148 

 

 

107 

 

900 

 

1,255 

 

2,155 

 

(89)

 

1984

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Prairie View

 

IL

 

(f)

 

780 

 

2,415 

 

- 

 

- 

 

780 

 

2,415 

 

3,195 

 

(269)

 

1975

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Carmel

 

IN

 

(f)

 

299 

 

783 

 

- 

 

- 

 

299 

 

783 

 

1,082 

 

(77)

 

1984

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Boxford

 

MA

 

(f)

 

1,185 

 

829 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,185 

 

829 

 

2,014 

 

(154)

 

1955

 

03/29/2013

Other Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing

 

South Hadley

 

MA

 

(f)

 

480 

 

3,832 

 

- 

 

- 

 

480 

 

3,832 

 

4,312 

 

(237)

 

1955

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Wakefield

 

MA

 

(f)

 

401 

 

901 

 

- 

 

- 

 

401 

 

901 

 

1,302 

 

(80)

 

1965

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Clinton Township

 

MI

 

(f)

 

511 

 

451 

 

- 

 

- 

 

511 

 

451 

 

962 

 

(54)

 

1977

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Cinnaminson

 

NJ

 

(f)

 

378 

 

323 

 

- 

 

- 

 

378 

 

323 

 

701 

 

(33)

 

1949

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Windsor

 

NJ

 

(f)

 

691 

 

170 

 

- 

 

- 

 

691 

 

170 

 

861 

 

(18)

 

1985

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Cincinnati

 

OH

 

(f)

 

605 

 

276 

 

- 

 

- 

 

605 

 

276 

 

881 

 

(33)

 

1972

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Chadds Ford

 

PA

 

(f)

 

837 

 

666 

 

- 

 

- 

 

837 

 

666 

 

1,503 

 

(64)

 

1979

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Houston

 

TX

 

(f)

 

237 

 

1,015 

 

- 

 

- 

 

237 

 

1,015 

 

1,252 

 

(93)

 

1975

 

03/29/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Spring

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,828 

 

3,561 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,828 

 

3,561 

 

5,389 

 

(283)

 

1973

 

03/29/2013

Automotive Parts, Accessories, and Tire Stores

 

La Salle

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,620 

 

8,166 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,620 

 

8,166 

 

9,786 

 

(543)

 

1997

 

04/17/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Amarillo

 

TX

 

(f)

 

840 

 

1,954 

 

- 

 

- 

 

840 

 

1,954 

 

2,794 

 

(127)

 

2002

 

05/06/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lubbock

 

TX

 

(f)

 

766 

 

1,657 

 

- 

 

- 

 

766 

 

1,657 

 

2,423 

 

(115)

 

2004

 

05/06/2013

Other Motor Vehicle Dealers

 

Byron

 

GA

 

2,827

 

1,726 

 

3,656 

 

932 

 

- 

 

2,658 

 

3,656 

 

6,314 

 

(294)

 

2007

 

05/16/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Clovis

 

NM

 

(f)

 

253 

 

787 

 

- 

 

- 

 

253 

 

787 

 

1,040 

 

(56)

 

2013

 

05/28/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Ruidoso

 

NM

 

(f)

 

518 

 

346 

 

72 

 

528 

 

590 

 

874 

 

1,464 

 

(54)

 

1961

 

05/28/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Tucumcari

 

NM

 

(f)

 

131 

 

507 

 

12 

 

188 

 

143 

 

695 

 

838 

 

(57)

 

1985

 

05/28/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Beeville

 

TX

 

(f)

 

189 

 

449 

 

14 

 

411 

 

203 

 

860 

 

1,063 

 

(49)

 

1986

 

05/28/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Corpus Christi

 

TX

 

(f)

 

473 

 

470 

 

- 

 

225 

 

473 

 

695 

 

1,168 

 

(52)

 

2005

 

05/28/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fort Stockton

 

TX

 

(f)

 

344 

 

657 

 

- 

 

12 

 

344 

 

669 

 

1,013 

 

(62)

 

1978

 

05/28/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lamesa

 

TX

 

(f)

 

221 

 

447 

 

13 

 

562 

 

234 

 

1,009 

 

1,243 

 

(76)

 

1978

 

05/28/2013

Motor Vehicle and Motor Vehicle Parts and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

 

Washington

 

PA

 

(f)

 

6,508 

 

1,380 

 

- 

 

- 

 

6,508 

 

1,380 

 

7,888 

 

(415)

 

1975

 

05/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Cincinnati

 

OH

 

(f)

 

1,334 

 

1,669 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,334 

 

1,669 

 

3,003 

 

(106)

 

2007

 

06/04/2013

Health Clubs

 

Auburn

 

AL

 

(f)

 

947 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

947 

 

-

 

947 

 

 

2007

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Cherokee Village

 

AR

 

(f)

 

498 

 

790 

 

- 

 

- 

 

498 

 

790 

 

1,288 

 

(60)

 

2011

 

06/14/2013

Health Clubs

 

Columbus

 

GA

 

(f)

 

1,357 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,357 

 

-

 

1,357 

 

 

2006

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Marion

 

IL

 

(f)

 

614 

 

668 

 

- 

 

- 

 

614 

 

668 

 

1,282 

 

(55)

 

2010

 

06/14/2013

Automobile Dealers

 

Michigan City

 

IN

 

(f)

 

832 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

832 

 

-

 

832 

 

 

2001

 

06/14/2013

F-9


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Automobile Dealers

 

Portage

 

IN

 

(f)

 

1,634 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,634 

 

-

 

1,634 

 

 

1998

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Albany

 

KY

 

(f)

 

396 

 

1,051 

 

- 

 

- 

 

396 

 

1,051 

 

1,447 

 

(78)

 

2010

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Cave City

 

KY

 

(f)

 

365 

 

754 

 

- 

 

- 

 

365 

 

754 

 

1,119 

 

(60)

 

2010

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Hartford

 

KY

 

(f)

 

337 

 

1,066 

 

- 

 

- 

 

337 

 

1,066 

 

1,403 

 

(77)

 

2012

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Gautier

 

MS

 

(f)

 

764 

 

1,037 

 

- 

 

- 

 

764 

 

1,037 

 

1,801 

 

(76)

 

2011

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Leakesville

 

MS

 

(f)

 

361 

 

915 

 

- 

 

- 

 

361 

 

915 

 

1,276 

 

(69)

 

2012

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Pascagoula

 

MS

 

(f)

 

646 

 

995 

 

- 

 

- 

 

646 

 

995 

 

1,641 

 

(70)

 

2011

 

06/14/2013

Department Stores

 

Purvis

 

MS

 

(f)

 

417 

 

901 

 

- 

 

- 

 

417 

 

901 

 

1,318 

 

(67)

 

2012

 

06/14/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

LaVale

 

MD

 

(f)

 

1,313 

 

1,629 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,313 

 

1,629 

 

2,942 

 

(101)

 

2005

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Columbus

 

OH

 

(f)

 

452 

 

1,687 

 

- 

 

- 

 

452 

 

1,687 

 

2,139 

 

(85)

 

2006

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Columbus

 

OH

 

(f)

 

253 

 

943 

 

- 

 

- 

 

253 

 

943 

 

1,196 

 

(48)

 

2006

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Delaware

 

OH

 

(f)

 

1,130 

 

1,029 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,130 

 

1,029 

 

2,159 

 

(58)

 

2005

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Delaware

 

OH

 

(f)

 

647 

 

590 

 

- 

 

- 

 

647 

 

590 

 

1,237 

 

(33)

 

2005

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Dublin

 

OH

 

(f)

 

843 

 

1,011 

 

- 

 

- 

 

843 

 

1,011 

 

1,854 

 

(72)

 

2003

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Hilliard

 

OH

 

(f)

 

278 

 

852 

 

- 

 

- 

 

278 

 

852 

 

1,130 

 

(45)

 

2003

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Hilliard

 

OH

 

(f)

 

485 

 

1,485 

 

- 

 

- 

 

485 

 

1,485 

 

1,970 

 

(79)

 

2003

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Marysville

 

OH

 

(f)

 

237 

 

949 

 

- 

 

- 

 

237 

 

949 

 

1,186 

 

(47)

 

2005

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Marysville

 

OH

 

(f)

 

424 

 

1,696 

 

- 

 

- 

 

424 

 

1,696 

 

2,120 

 

(85)

 

2005

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Powell

 

OH

 

(f)

 

735 

 

2,303 

 

- 

 

- 

 

735 

 

2,303 

 

3,038 

 

(122)

 

2004

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Powell

 

OH

 

(f)

 

286 

 

895 

 

- 

 

- 

 

286 

 

895 

 

1,181 

 

(47)

 

2004

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Westerville

 

OH

 

(f)

 

315 

 

918 

 

- 

 

- 

 

315 

 

918 

 

1,233 

 

(49)

 

2005

 

06/27/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Westerville

 

OH

 

(f)

 

550 

 

1,601 

 

- 

 

- 

 

550 

 

1,601 

 

2,151 

 

(86)

 

2005

 

06/27/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Midlothian

 

VA

 

(f)

 

729 

 

2,037 

 

- 

 

- 

 

729 

 

2,037 

 

2,766 

 

(116)

 

1992

 

06/27/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Martinsburg

 

WV

 

(f)

 

1,115 

 

1,267 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,115 

 

1,267 

 

2,382 

 

(79)

 

1995

 

06/27/2013

Other Motor Vehicle Dealers

 

Holiday

 

FL

 

(f)

 

2,444 

 

2,723 

 

912 

 

20 

 

3,356 

 

2,743 

 

6,099 

 

(188)

 

1974

 

06/28/2013

Other Motor Vehicle Dealers

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

1,758 

 

2,450 

 

460 

 

1,375 

 

2,218 

 

3,825 

 

6,043 

 

(174)

 

2010

 

06/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Charlotte

 

NC

 

(f)

 

1,545 

 

2,176 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,545 

 

2,176 

 

3,721 

 

(146)

 

2009

 

06/28/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Maineville

 

OH

 

(f)

 

685 

 

1,575 

 

- 

 

- 

 

685 

 

1,575 

 

2,260 

 

(102)

 

2008

 

06/28/2013

Outpatient Care Centers

 

North Charleston

 

SC

 

(f)

 

410 

 

2,356 

 

- 

 

- 

 

410 

 

2,356 

 

2,766 

 

(98)

 

2009

 

06/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Glen Allen

 

VA

 

(f)

 

2,184 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,184 

 

- 

 

2,184 

 

 

1995

 

06/28/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

North Chesterfield

 

VA

 

(f)

 

1,951 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,951 

 

- 

 

1,951 

 

 

1993

 

06/28/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Harker Heights

 

TX

 

 

 

860 

 

150 

 

577 

 

1,811 

 

1,437 

 

1,961 

 

3,398 

 

(52)

 

2014

 

07/09/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Broken Arrow

 

OK

 

(f)

 

366 

 

597 

 

- 

 

- 

 

366 

 

597 

 

963 

 

(33)

 

2007

 

07/12/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Moore

 

OK

 

(f)

 

179 

 

744 

 

- 

 

- 

 

179 

 

744 

 

923 

 

(37)

 

2000

 

07/12/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

161 

 

554 

 

- 

 

- 

 

161 

 

554 

 

715 

 

(36)

 

1978

 

07/12/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Oklahoma City

 

OK

 

(f)

 

400 

 

473 

 

- 

 

- 

 

400 

 

473 

 

873 

 

(33)

 

1998

 

07/12/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Leawood

 

KS

 

(f)

 

278 

 

334 

 

130 

 

270 

 

408 

 

604 

 

1,012 

 

(37)

 

1966

 

07/16/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chattanooga

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,041 

 

1,101 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,041 

 

1,101 

 

2,142 

 

(67)

 

1994

 

07/17/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Franklin

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,641 

 

1,358 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,641 

 

1,358 

 

2,999 

 

(83)

 

1992

 

07/17/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Hermitage

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,292 

 

1,228 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,292 

 

1,228 

 

2,520 

 

(77)

 

1998

 

07/17/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,072 

 

1,169 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,072 

 

1,169 

 

2,241 

 

(73)

 

1986

 

07/17/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Conover

 

NC

 

(f)

 

250 

 

644 

 

- 

 

- 

 

250 

 

644 

 

894 

 

(37)

 

1985

 

07/26/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Conover

 

NC

 

(f)

 

257 

 

780 

 

- 

 

- 

 

257 

 

780 

 

1,037 

 

(47)

 

1986

 

07/26/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Dobson

 

NC

 

(f)

 

73 

 

413 

 

- 

 

- 

 

73 

 

413 

 

486 

 

(25)

 

1996

 

07/26/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Millers Creek

 

NC

 

(f)

 

219 

 

321 

 

- 

 

- 

 

219 

 

321 

 

540 

 

(28)

 

1997

 

07/26/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Wilson

 

NC

 

(f)

 

601 

 

568 

 

- 

 

- 

 

601 

 

568 

 

1,169 

 

(34)

 

1987

 

07/26/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Charlottesville

 

VA

 

(f)

 

708 

 

328 

 

- 

 

- 

 

708 

 

328 

 

1,036 

 

(26)

 

1990

 

07/26/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Charlottesville

 

VA

 

(f)

 

959 

 

123 

 

- 

 

- 

 

959 

 

123 

 

1,082 

 

(11)

 

1992

 

07/26/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Montgomery

 

AL

 

(f)

 

1,615 

 

1,444 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,615 

 

1,444 

 

3,059 

 

(101)

 

2006

 

07/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Champaign

 

IL

 

(f)

 

777 

 

1,640 

 

- 

 

- 

 

777 

 

1,640 

 

2,417 

 

(106)

 

1984

 

07/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Peoria

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,122 

 

1,305 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,122 

 

1,305 

 

2,427 

 

(84)

 

2005

 

07/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Rockford

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,012 

 

1,643 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,012 

 

1,643 

 

2,655 

 

(89)

 

1992

 

07/31/2013

F-10


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Gulfport

 

MS

 

(f)

 

2,288 

 

1,674 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,288 

 

1,674 

 

3,962 

 

(110)

 

2008

 

07/31/2013

Home Furnishings Stores

 

Centerville

 

OH

 

(f)

 

341 

 

948 

 

- 

 

- 

 

341 

 

948 

 

1,289 

 

(55)

 

1994

 

08/08/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Tempe

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

1,696 

 

545 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,696 

 

545 

 

2,241 

 

(91)

 

1988

 

08/13/2013

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Lubbock

 

TX

 

 

 

1,115 

 

331 

 

747 

 

5,305 

 

1,862 

 

5,636 

 

7,498 

 

(127)

 

2014

 

08/16/2013

Plastics Product Manufacturing

 

Milesburg

 

PA

 

(f)

 

2,563 

 

4,327 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,563 

 

4,327 

 

6,890 

 

(421)

 

1970

 

08/23/2013

Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing

 

Davie

 

FL

 

(f)

 

2,198 

 

1,973 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,198 

 

1,973 

 

4,171 

 

(85)

 

1996

 

08/28/2013

Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing

 

Fort Myers

 

FL

 

(f)

 

1,384 

 

4,797 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,384 

 

4,797 

 

6,181 

 

(181)

 

2007

 

08/28/2013

Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing

 

Tampa

 

FL

 

(f)

 

2,063 

 

4,869 

 

318 

 

1,182 

 

2,381 

 

6,051 

 

8,432 

 

(247)

 

2000

 

08/28/2013

Furniture Stores

 

Huntsville

 

AL

 

(f)

 

1,812 

 

4,314 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,812 

 

4,314 

 

6,126 

 

(186)

 

1987

 

08/29/2013

Furniture Stores

 

Tuscaloosa

 

AL

 

(f)

 

1,273 

 

3,856 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,273 

 

3,856 

 

5,129 

 

(140)

 

2007

 

08/29/2013

Grocery Stores

 

Houghton

 

MI

 

(f)

 

1,009 

 

1,955 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,009 

 

1,955 

 

2,964 

 

(131)

 

1993

 

08/29/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Tulsa

 

OK

 

(f)

 

3,210 

 

3,773 

 

- 

 

350 

 

3,210 

 

4,123 

 

7,333 

 

(305)

 

1991

 

08/30/2013

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Charleston

 

SC

 

(f)

 

1,005 

 

1,802 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,005 

 

1,802 

 

2,807 

 

(71)

 

1968

 

08/30/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Athens

 

TN

 

(f)

 

318 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

318 

 

- 

 

318 

 

 

2005

 

08/30/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cleveland

 

TN

 

(f)

 

346 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

346 

 

- 

 

346 

 

 

2001

 

08/30/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Dayton

 

TN

 

(f)

 

271 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

271 

 

- 

 

271 

 

 

1997

 

08/30/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Kimball

 

TN

 

(f)

 

271 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

271 

 

- 

 

271 

 

 

1987

 

08/30/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Madisonville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

243 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

243 

 

- 

 

243 

 

 

2005

 

08/30/2013

Home Furnishings Stores

 

Fort Worth

 

TX

 

(f)

 

3,783 

 

9,559 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,783 

 

9,559 

 

13,342 

 

(388)

 

1998

 

08/30/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Flint

 

MI

 

(f)

 

919 

 

6,382 

 

- 

 

- 

 

919 

 

6,382 

 

7,301 

 

(437)

 

1992

 

09/16/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Kentwood

 

MI

 

(f)

 

1,935 

 

1,473 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,935 

 

1,473 

 

3,408 

 

(91)

 

1995

 

09/16/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Moncks Corner

 

SC

 

(f)

 

145 

 

768 

 

- 

 

- 

 

145 

 

768 

 

913 

 

(27)

 

1989

 

09/17/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Peoria

 

IL

 

(f)

 

850 

 

2,768 

 

- 

 

- 

 

850 

 

2,768 

 

3,618 

 

(102)

 

2001

 

09/18/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Jackson

 

TN

 

(f)

 

3,437 

 

4,634 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,437 

 

4,634 

 

8,071 

 

(196)

 

2007

 

09/18/2013

Health Clubs

 

Weslaco

 

TX

 

 

 

1,565 

 

224 

 

354 

 

3,020 

 

1,919 

 

3,244 

 

5,163 

 

(61)

 

2014

 

09/27/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Bradenton

 

FL

 

(f)

 

365 

 

524 

 

- 

 

- 

 

365 

 

524 

 

889 

 

(26)

 

1964

 

09/30/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Dade City

 

FL

 

(f)

 

533 

 

752 

 

- 

 

- 

 

533 

 

752 

 

1,285 

 

(40)

 

1995

 

09/30/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Lake City

 

FL

 

(f)

 

192 

 

465 

 

- 

 

- 

 

192 

 

465 

 

657 

 

(22)

 

1973

 

09/30/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Plant City

 

FL

 

(f)

 

412 

 

985 

 

- 

 

- 

 

412 

 

985 

 

1,397 

 

(50)

 

1979

 

09/30/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Tampa

 

FL

 

(f)

 

752 

 

4,014 

 

- 

 

- 

 

752 

 

4,014 

 

4,766 

 

(188)

 

1967

 

09/30/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Tampa

 

FL

 

(f)

 

139 

 

457 

 

- 

 

- 

 

139 

 

457 

 

596 

 

(22)

 

1967

 

09/30/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Tampa

 

FL

 

(f)

 

347 

 

380 

 

- 

 

- 

 

347 

 

380 

 

727 

 

(23)

 

1999

 

09/30/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Adel

 

GA

 

(f)

 

102 

 

544 

 

- 

 

- 

 

102 

 

544 

 

646 

 

(26)

 

1978

 

09/30/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Moultrie

 

GA

 

(f)

 

142 

 

1,073 

 

- 

 

- 

 

142 

 

1,073 

 

1,215 

 

(49)

 

1960

 

09/30/2013

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Ballwin

 

MO

 

 

 

233 

 

1,297 

 

- 

 

- 

 

233 

 

1,297 

 

1,530 

 

(42)

 

2011

 

09/30/2013

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Ballwin

 

MO

 

 

 

610 

 

3,390 

 

- 

 

- 

 

610 

 

3,390 

 

4,000 

 

(110)

 

2004

 

09/30/2013

Family Entertainment Centers

 

Bethlehem

 

PA

 

(f)

 

2,484 

 

3,534 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,484 

 

3,534 

 

6,018 

 

(183)

 

1998

 

10/04/2013

Fiber, Yarn, and Thread Mills

 

Brownsville

 

TX

 

(f)

 

547 

 

1,826 

 

- 

 

- 

 

547 

 

1,826 

 

2,373 

 

(97)

 

1997

 

10/08/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Auburn

 

WA

 

(f)

 

236 

 

835 

 

- 

 

- 

 

236 

 

835 

 

1,071 

 

(34)

 

1953

 

10/11/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Centralia

 

WA

 

(f)

 

298 

 

711 

 

- 

 

- 

 

298 

 

711 

 

1,009 

 

(39)

 

1975

 

10/11/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Moses Lake

 

WA

 

(f)

 

451 

 

569 

 

- 

 

- 

 

451 

 

569 

 

1,020 

 

(35)

 

1993

 

10/11/2013

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Wenatchee

 

WA

 

(f)

 

535 

 

259 

 

- 

 

- 

 

535 

 

259 

 

794 

 

(14)

 

2005

 

10/11/2013

F-11


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

(f)

 

353 

 

3,103 

 

- 

 

- 

 

353 

 

3,103 

 

3,456 

 

(127)

 

1894

 

10/18/2013

Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing

 

Cranberry Township

 

PA

 

(f)

 

1,220 

 

3,513 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,220 

 

3,513 

 

4,733 

 

(232)

 

1998

 

10/25/2013

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

1,062 

 

6,666 

 

89 

 

292 

 

1,151 

 

6,958 

 

8,109 

 

(221)

 

1984

 

10/31/2013

Health Clubs

 

San Antonio

 

TX

 

(f)

 

3,403 

 

2,796 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,403 

 

2,796 

 

6,199 

 

(108)

 

2013

 

11/04/2013

Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

 

Williams

 

IA

 

(f)

 

2,134 

 

4,245 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,134 

 

4,245 

 

6,379 

 

(255)

 

2013

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

Melrose Park

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,285 

 

3,249 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,285 

 

3,249 

 

4,534 

 

(150)

 

1966

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

Northlake

 

IL

 

(f)

 

593 

 

2,234 

 

- 

 

- 

 

593 

 

2,234 

 

2,827 

 

(98)

 

1964

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

Northlake

 

IL

 

(f)

 

770 

 

1,055 

 

- 

 

- 

 

770 

 

1,055 

 

1,825 

 

(60)

 

1958

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

Rockford

 

IL

 

(f)

 

513 

 

1,211 

 

- 

 

- 

 

513 

 

1,211 

 

1,724 

 

(55)

 

1977

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

South Bend

 

IN

 

(f)

 

359 

 

1,464 

 

- 

 

- 

 

359 

 

1,464 

 

1,823 

 

(74)

 

1983

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

Benton Harbor

 

MI

 

(f)

 

659 

 

1,475 

 

- 

 

- 

 

659 

 

1,475 

 

2,134 

 

(83)

 

1957

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

Coldwater

 

MI

 

(f)

 

757 

 

2,484 

 

- 

 

- 

 

757 

 

2,484 

 

3,241 

 

(141)

 

1995

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

Kitchener

 

ON

 

 

 

1,440 

 

3,296 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,440 

 

3,296 

 

4,736 

 

(144)

 

1975

 

11/08/2013

Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities

 

St. Marys

 

PA

 

(f)

 

447 

 

2,098 

 

- 

 

- 

 

447 

 

2,098 

 

2,545 

 

(96)

 

1987

 

11/08/2013

Furniture Stores

 

Southaven

 

MS

 

(f)

 

1,969 

 

4,553 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,969 

 

4,553 

 

6,522 

 

(150)

 

2007

 

11/12/2013

Furniture Stores

 

Chattanooga

 

TN

 

(f)

 

2,897 

 

3,891 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,897 

 

3,891 

 

6,788 

 

(165)

 

1996

 

11/12/2013

Furniture Stores

 

Jackson

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,956 

 

3,757 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,956 

 

3,757 

 

5,713 

 

(150)

 

2004

 

11/12/2013

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing

 

Green Bay

 

WI

 

(f)

 

871 

 

6,889 

 

- 

 

- 

 

871 

 

6,889 

 

7,760 

 

(305)

 

1997

 

11/12/2013

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing

 

Green Bay

 

WI

 

(f)

 

795 

 

4,877 

 

- 

 

- 

 

795 

 

4,877 

 

5,672 

 

(318)

 

1968

 

11/12/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Fargo

 

ND

 

(f)

 

2,024 

 

7,151 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,024 

 

7,151 

 

9,175 

 

(282)

 

2004

 

11/14/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

College Station

 

TX

 

13,863

 

4,044 

 

8,057 

 

- 

 

- 

 

4,044 

 

8,057 

 

12,101 

 

(281)

 

2007

 

11/14/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Lubbock

 

TX

 

 

 

3,264 

 

6,622 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,264 

 

6,622 

 

9,886 

 

(201)

 

2007

 

11/14/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Gadsden

 

AL

 

 

 

1,849 

 

299 

 

297 

 

4,003 

 

2,146 

 

4,302 

 

6,448 

 

(85)

 

2014

 

11/15/2013

Other Personal Services

 

Charlotte

 

NC

 

(f)

 

681 

 

2,905 

 

- 

 

- 

 

681 

 

2,905 

 

3,586 

 

(91)

 

2002

 

11/22/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Alcoa

 

TN

 

(f)

 

572 

 

1,295 

 

- 

 

- 

 

572 

 

1,295 

 

1,867 

 

(59)

 

1997

 

11/22/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

861 

 

2,073 

 

- 

 

- 

 

861 

 

2,073 

 

2,934 

 

(99)

 

1995

 

11/22/2013

Health Clubs

 

Humble

 

TX

 

(f)

 

1,209 

 

2,816 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,209 

 

2,816 

 

4,025 

 

(97)

 

2012

 

11/27/2013

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Spring Hill

 

TN

 

 

 

1,976 

 

180 

 

- 

 

4,762 

 

1,976 

 

4,942 

 

6,918 

 

 

 

 

12/12/2013

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Austin

 

TX

 

7,511

 

3,839 

 

6,201 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,839 

 

6,201 

 

10,040 

 

(183)

 

2012

 

12/12/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Waco

 

TX

 

 

 

888 

 

123 

 

654 

 

2,040 

 

1,542 

 

2,163 

 

3,705 

 

(41)

 

2014

 

12/12/2013

Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers

 

Conway

 

SC

 

(f)

 

1,727 

 

3,668 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,727 

 

3,668 

 

5,395 

 

(217)

 

2002

 

12/13/2013

F-12


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Chandler

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

577 

 

1,405 

 

- 

 

- 

 

577 

 

1,405 

 

1,982 

 

(59)

 

2007

 

12/16/2013

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Gilbert

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

578 

 

1,335 

 

- 

 

- 

 

578 

 

1,335 

 

1,913 

 

(58)

 

2004

 

12/16/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Burlington

 

IA

 

(f)

 

585 

 

1,571 

 

- 

 

- 

 

585 

 

1,571 

 

2,156 

 

(61)

 

2010

 

12/18/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Galesburg

 

IL

 

(f)

 

870 

 

1,287 

 

- 

 

- 

 

870 

 

1,287 

 

2,157 

 

(58)

 

2007

 

12/18/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Macomb

 

IL

 

(f)

 

858 

 

1,299 

 

- 

 

- 

 

858 

 

1,299 

 

2,157 

 

(59)

 

2009

 

12/18/2013

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Cicero

 

NY

 

6,676

 

1,933 

 

7,013 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,933 

 

7,013 

 

8,946 

 

(226)

 

2004

 

12/19/2013

Health Clubs

 

Denver

 

CO

 

(f)

 

654 

 

4,393 

 

12 

 

453 

 

666 

 

4,846 

 

5,512 

 

(183)

 

1997

 

12/30/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Evansville

 

IN

 

(f)

 

381 

 

840 

 

- 

 

- 

 

381 

 

840 

 

1,221 

 

(38)

 

2005

 

12/30/2013

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

223 

 

1,508 

 

- 

 

- 

 

223 

 

1,508 

 

1,731 

 

(62)

 

1981

 

12/30/2013

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

214 

 

1,444 

 

- 

 

- 

 

214 

 

1,444 

 

1,658 

 

(59)

 

1973

 

12/30/2013

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

(f)

 

72 

 

485 

 

- 

 

- 

 

72 

 

485 

 

557 

 

(20)

 

1989

 

12/30/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Houston

 

TX

 

(f)

 

666 

 

780 

 

- 

 

- 

 

666 

 

780 

 

1,446 

 

(34)

 

2006

 

12/30/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lubbock

 

TX

 

(f)

 

430 

 

920 

 

- 

 

- 

 

430 

 

920 

 

1,350 

 

(39)

 

2002

 

12/30/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Bristol

 

CT

 

(f)

 

473 

 

501 

 

- 

 

- 

 

473 

 

501 

 

974 

 

(22)

 

1987

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

East Hartford

 

CT

 

(f)

 

345 

 

401 

 

- 

 

- 

 

345 

 

401 

 

746 

 

(18)

 

1917

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Hamden

 

CT

 

(f)

 

346 

 

349 

 

- 

 

- 

 

346 

 

349 

 

695 

 

(17)

 

1985

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Hartford

 

CT

 

(f)

 

270 

 

395 

 

- 

 

- 

 

270 

 

395 

 

665 

 

(14)

 

2009

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Manchester

 

CT

 

(f)

 

114 

 

602 

 

- 

 

- 

 

114 

 

602 

 

716 

 

(24)

 

1953

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

New Britain

 

CT

 

(f)

 

394 

 

1,038 

 

- 

 

- 

 

394 

 

1,038 

 

1,432 

 

(42)

 

1988

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

New Haven

 

CT

 

(f)

 

231 

 

613 

 

- 

 

- 

 

231 

 

613 

 

844 

 

(24)

 

1982

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Southington

 

CT

 

(f)

 

678 

 

376 

 

- 

 

- 

 

678 

 

376 

 

1,054 

 

(18)

 

2001

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Vernon

 

CT

 

(f)

 

255 

 

629 

 

- 

 

- 

 

255 

 

629 

 

884 

 

(29)

 

1983

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

West Hartford

 

CT

 

(f)

 

316 

 

917 

 

- 

 

- 

 

316 

 

917 

 

1,233 

 

(36)

 

1998

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Gainesville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

220 

 

376 

 

- 

 

- 

 

220 

 

376 

 

596 

 

(19)

 

1980

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Gainesville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

463 

 

432 

 

- 

 

- 

 

463 

 

432 

 

895 

 

(26)

 

2001

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Middleburg

 

FL

 

(f)

 

502 

 

432 

 

- 

 

- 

 

502 

 

432 

 

934 

 

(22)

 

2001

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Perry

 

FL

 

(f)

 

184 

 

472 

 

- 

 

- 

 

184 

 

472 

 

656 

 

(22)

 

1979

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Starke

 

FL

 

(f)

 

365 

 

232 

 

- 

 

- 

 

365 

 

232 

 

597 

 

(13)

 

1991

 

12/31/2013

Other Motor Vehicle Dealers

 

Lake Park

 

GA

 

(f)

 

2,108 

 

2,897 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,108 

 

2,897 

 

5,005 

 

(146)

 

2013

 

12/31/2013

Other Food Manufacturing

 

South Holland

 

IL

 

(f)

 

1,373 

 

14,648 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,373 

 

14,648 

 

16,021 

 

(510)

 

1991

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Olathe

 

KS

 

(f)

 

787 

 

2,119 

 

- 

 

- 

 

787 

 

2,119 

 

2,906 

 

(84)

 

2005

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Springfield

 

MO

 

(f)

 

1,684 

 

5,405 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,684 

 

5,405 

 

7,089 

 

(212)

 

1977

 

12/31/2013

Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing

 

State College

 

PA

 

9,984

 

4,398 

 

11,503 

 

- 

 

- 

 

4,398 

 

11,503 

 

15,901 

 

(693)

 

1960

 

12/31/2013

Elementary and Secondary Schools

 

Arlington

 

TX

 

(f)

 

744 

 

5,783 

 

- 

 

- 

 

744 

 

5,783 

 

6,527 

 

(163)

 

1945

 

12/31/2013

Child Day Care Services

 

Houston

 

TX

 

(f)

 

706 

 

2,798 

 

- 

 

- 

 

706 

 

2,798 

 

3,504 

 

(80)

 

2003

 

12/31/2013

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Keller

 

TX

 

 

 

1,532 

 

1,720 

 

1,692 

 

5,759 

 

3,224 

 

7,479 

 

10,703 

 

(50)

 

2014

 

12/31/2013

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Buckeye

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

731 

 

724 

 

- 

 

- 

 

731 

 

724 

 

1,455 

 

(58)

 

1999

 

01/03/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Bullhead City

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

461 

 

282 

 

- 

 

- 

 

461 

 

282 

 

743 

 

(21)

 

2002

 

01/03/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Cottonwood

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

503 

 

611 

 

- 

 

- 

 

503 

 

611 

 

1,114 

 

(35)

 

1996

 

01/03/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Golden Valley

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

316 

 

206 

 

- 

 

- 

 

316 

 

206 

 

522 

 

(16)

 

1998

 

01/03/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Prescott

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

640 

 

635 

 

- 

 

- 

 

640 

 

635 

 

1,275 

 

(45)

 

1993

 

01/03/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Show Low

 

AZ

 

(f)

 

603 

 

882 

 

- 

 

- 

 

603 

 

882 

 

1,485 

 

(49)

 

2006

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Alexandria

 

KY

 

(f)

 

317 

 

852 

 

- 

 

- 

 

317 

 

852 

 

1,169 

 

(33)

 

1997

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Covington

 

KY

 

(f)

 

240 

 

989 

 

- 

 

- 

 

240 

 

989 

 

1,229 

 

(33)

 

1990

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Crescent Springs

 

KY

 

(f)

 

205 

 

692 

 

- 

 

- 

 

205 

 

692 

 

897 

 

(29)

 

1990

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Crestview Hills

 

KY

 

(f)

 

566 

 

1,862 

 

- 

 

- 

 

566 

 

1,862 

 

2,428 

 

(61)

 

2007

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Erlanger

 

KY

 

(f)

 

295 

 

1,277 

 

- 

 

- 

 

295 

 

1,277 

 

1,572 

 

(48)

 

2000

 

01/03/2014

F-13


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Child Day Care Services

 

Florence

 

KY

 

(f)

 

418 

 

1,426 

 

- 

 

- 

 

418 

 

1,426 

 

1,844 

 

(55)

 

1992

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Florence

 

KY

 

(f)

 

289 

 

699 

 

- 

 

- 

 

289 

 

699 

 

988 

 

(32)

 

1988

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Hebron

 

KY

 

(f)

 

350 

 

1,555 

 

- 

 

- 

 

350 

 

1,555 

 

1,905 

 

(59)

 

1997

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Independence

 

KY

 

(f)

 

440 

 

1,141 

 

- 

 

- 

 

440 

 

1,141 

 

1,581 

 

(51)

 

2000

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Taylor Mill

 

KY

 

(f)

 

658 

 

752 

 

- 

 

- 

 

658 

 

752 

 

1,410 

 

(36)

 

1995

 

01/03/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Walton

 

KY

 

(f)

 

269 

 

1,253 

 

- 

 

- 

 

269 

 

1,253 

 

1,522 

 

(45)

 

1998

 

01/03/2014

Other Food Manufacturing

 

Mason City

 

IA

 

(f)

 

401 

 

8,703 

 

- 

 

- 

 

401 

 

8,703 

 

9,104 

 

(226)

 

2003

 

01/10/2014

Gambling Industries

 

Cripple Creek

 

CO

 

 

 

702 

 

16,128 

 

- 

 

- 

 

702 

 

16,128 

 

16,830 

 

(380)

 

2008

 

01/17/2014

Gambling Industries

 

Cripple Creek

 

CO

 

 

 

212 

 

588 

 

- 

 

- 

 

212 

 

588 

 

800 

 

(30)

 

1993

 

01/17/2014

Gambling Industries

 

Cripple Creek

 

CO

 

 

 

105 

 

-

 

- 

 

- 

 

105 

 

-

 

105 

 

 

 

 

01/17/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Jamestown

 

NC

 

(f)

 

477 

 

730 

 

- 

 

- 

 

477 

 

730 

 

1,207 

 

(38)

 

1989

 

01/24/2014

Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing

 

Montrose

 

CO

 

(f)

 

291 

 

5,521 

 

- 

 

- 

 

291 

 

5,521 

 

5,812 

 

(179)

 

1995

 

01/31/2014

Health Clubs

 

Louisville

 

KY

 

(f)

 

2,493 

 

6,029 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,493 

 

6,029 

 

8,522 

 

(222)

 

1972

 

01/31/2014

Health Clubs

 

Antioch

 

TN

 

 

 

1,400 

 

5,388 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,400 

 

5,388 

 

6,788 

 

(157)

 

2002

 

01/31/2014

Health Clubs

 

Lexington

 

KY

 

15,857

 

1,164 

 

8,000 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,164 

 

8,000 

 

9,164 

 

(204)

 

2004

 

01/31/2014

Health Clubs

 

Lexington

 

KY

 

 

 

1,251 

 

6,619 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,251 

 

6,619 

 

7,870 

 

(169)

 

2005

 

01/31/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Fayetteville

 

AR

 

(f)

 

465 

 

1,866 

 

- 

 

- 

 

465 

 

1,866 

 

2,331 

 

(56)

 

2012

 

02/14/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Eagan

 

MN

 

(f)

 

1,405 

 

2,162 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,405 

 

2,162 

 

3,567 

 

(59)

 

1996

 

02/19/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Maplewood

 

MN

 

(f)

 

915 

 

1,848 

 

- 

 

- 

 

915 

 

1,848 

 

2,763 

 

(51)

 

2000

 

02/19/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Naperville

 

IL

 

 

 

2,000 

 

489 

 

501 

 

1,564 

 

2,501 

 

2,053 

 

4,554 

 

(30)

 

2014

 

03/06/2014

Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools

 

Columbia

 

SC

 

 

 

562 

 

11,878 

 

- 

 

810 

 

562 

 

12,688 

 

13,250 

 

(339)

 

1995

 

03/10/2014

Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools

 

Columbia

 

SC

 

 

 

638 

 

5,017 

 

- 

 

- 

 

638 

 

5,017 

 

5,655 

 

(142)

 

2010

 

03/10/2014

Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools

 

Columbia

 

SC

 

 

 

244 

 

-

 

- 

 

3,740 

 

244 

 

3,740 

 

3,984 

 

 

 

 

03/10/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Alpharetta

 

GA

 

 

 

920 

 

1,590 

 

- 

 

- 

 

920 

 

1,590 

 

2,510 

 

(40)

 

2007

 

03/11/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Cumming

 

GA

 

 

 

826 

 

3,449 

 

- 

 

- 

 

826 

 

3,449 

 

4,275 

 

(80)

 

2006

 

03/11/2014

Health Clubs

 

Vestavia Hills

 

AL

 

 

 

1,299 

 

6,199 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,299 

 

6,199 

 

7,498 

 

(135)

 

2007

 

03/20/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Athens

 

GA

 

(f)

 

731 

 

1,065 

 

- 

 

- 

 

731 

 

1,065 

 

1,796 

 

(33)

 

2007

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Winder

 

GA

 

(f)

 

752 

 

1,045 

 

- 

 

- 

 

752 

 

1,045 

 

1,797 

 

(24)

 

2005

 

03/21/2014

Junior Colleges

 

Overland Park

 

KS

 

 

 

4,181 

 

8,942 

 

- 

 

- 

 

4,181 

 

8,942 

 

13,123 

 

(176)

 

2012

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lenoir

 

NC

 

(f)

 

975 

 

1,065 

 

- 

 

- 

 

975 

 

1,065 

 

2,040 

 

(25)

 

2008

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Anderson

 

SC

 

(f)

 

900 

 

825 

 

- 

 

- 

 

900 

 

825 

 

1,725 

 

(28)

 

2006

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Camden

 

SC

 

(f)

 

765 

 

1,275 

 

- 

 

- 

 

765 

 

1,275 

 

2,040 

 

(33)

 

2006

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Cheraw

 

SC

 

(f)

 

626 

 

947 

 

- 

 

- 

 

626 

 

947 

 

1,573 

 

(24)

 

2007

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Clinton

 

SC

 

(f)

 

697 

 

1,515 

 

- 

 

- 

 

697 

 

1,515 

 

2,212 

 

(38)

 

2006

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Greenwood

 

SC

 

(f)

 

808 

 

1,181 

 

- 

 

- 

 

808 

 

1,181 

 

1,989 

 

(40)

 

1995

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Bristol

 

TN

 

(f)

 

776 

 

1,020 

 

- 

 

- 

 

776 

 

1,020 

 

1,796 

 

(34)

 

2005

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Kingsport

 

TN

 

(f)

 

814 

 

1,053 

 

- 

 

- 

 

814 

 

1,053 

 

1,867 

 

(34)

 

2006

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Dublin

 

VA

 

(f)

 

947 

 

971 

 

- 

 

- 

 

947 

 

971 

 

1,918 

 

(28)

 

2008

 

03/21/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

494 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

494 

 

-

 

494 

 

 

1997

 

03/27/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Miami

 

FL

 

(f)

 

1,210 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,210 

 

-

 

1,210 

 

 

1981

 

03/27/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Orlando

 

FL

 

(f)

 

625 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

625 

 

-

 

625 

 

 

1997

 

03/27/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Tampa

 

FL

 

(f)

 

474 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

474 

 

-

 

474 

 

 

1999

 

03/27/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Warner Robins

 

GA

 

(f)

 

373 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

373 

 

-

 

373 

 

 

1996

 

03/27/2014

Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

 

Irving

 

TX

 

 

 

1,375 

 

4,661 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,375 

 

4,661 

 

6,036 

 

(105)

 

1982

 

03/27/2014

Family Entertainment Centers

 

Tempe

 

AZ

 

 

 

3,288 

 

6,268 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,288 

 

6,268 

 

9,556 

 

(167)

 

2013

 

03/28/2014

F-14


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Los Fresnos

 

TX

 

 

 

250 

 

772 

 

14 

 

86 

 

264 

 

858 

 

1,122 

 

(27)

 

2014

 

03/28/2014

Health Clubs

 

Antioch

 

CA

 

 

 

836 

 

2,724 

 

- 

 

- 

 

836 

 

2,724 

 

3,560 

 

(72)

 

1989

 

03/31/2014

Health Clubs

 

Monterey

 

CA

 

 

 

868 

 

2,694 

 

- 

 

- 

 

868 

 

2,694 

 

3,562 

 

(79)

 

1978

 

03/31/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Boynton Beach

 

FL

 

 

 

301 

 

4,727 

 

- 

 

- 

 

301 

 

4,727 

 

5,028 

 

(143)

 

2005

 

03/31/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Jupiter

 

FL

 

 

 

158 

 

4,457 

 

- 

 

- 

 

158 

 

4,457 

 

4,615 

 

(101)

 

2011

 

03/31/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Wellington

 

FL

 

 

 

860 

 

4,652 

 

- 

 

- 

 

860 

 

4,652 

 

5,512 

 

(119)

 

2009

 

03/31/2014

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing

 

Hattiesburg

 

MS

 

 

 

2,727 

 

4,045 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,727 

 

4,045 

 

6,772 

 

(117)

 

1982

 

03/31/2014

Automotive Parts, Accessories, and Tire Stores

 

Miami

 

OK

 

 

 

90 

 

1,157 

 

739 

 

1,949 

 

829 

 

3,106 

 

3,935 

 

(59)

 

1971

 

03/31/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Fort Mill

 

SC

 

 

 

707 

 

3,271 

 

- 

 

- 

 

707 

 

3,271 

 

3,978 

 

(79)

 

2007

 

03/31/2014

Other Wood Product Manufacturing

 

Elgin

 

IL

 

 

 

1,374 

 

714 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,374 

 

714 

 

2,088 

 

(19)

 

1996

 

04/09/2014

Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing

 

Bozeman

 

MT

 

 

 

2,127 

 

348 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,127 

 

348 

 

2,475 

 

(19)

 

1977

 

04/09/2014

Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing

 

Nashville

 

TN

 

 

 

4,264 

 

4,273 

 

- 

 

- 

 

4,264 

 

4,273 

 

8,537 

 

(178)

 

1975

 

04/09/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Fort Pierce

 

FL

 

 

 

806 

 

2,953 

 

- 

 

- 

 

806 

 

2,953 

 

3,759 

 

(111)

 

2007

 

04/10/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Palm Beach Gardens

 

FL

 

 

 

43 

 

1,337 

 

- 

 

- 

 

43 

 

1,337 

 

1,380 

 

(33)

 

2005

 

04/10/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Palm Beach Gardens

 

FL

 

 

 

32 

 

1,288 

 

- 

 

- 

 

32 

 

1,288 

 

1,320 

 

(36)

 

2005

 

04/10/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Vero Beach

 

FL

 

 

 

233 

 

2,529 

 

- 

 

- 

 

233 

 

2,529 

 

2,762 

 

(86)

 

2009

 

04/10/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Wellington

 

FL

 

 

 

272 

 

1,421 

 

- 

 

- 

 

272 

 

1,421 

 

1,693 

 

(22)

 

2008

 

04/10/2014

Health Clubs

 

Phoenix

 

AZ

 

 

 

-

 

-

 

- 

 

4,218 

 

-

 

4,218 

 

4,218 

 

 

 

 

04/16/2014

Junior Colleges

 

Youngstown

 

OH

 

 

 

471 

 

5,075 

 

- 

 

667 

 

471 

 

5,742 

 

6,213 

 

(114)

 

1974

 

04/16/2014

Health Clubs

 

Live Oak

 

TX

 

3,512

 

1,266 

 

4,022 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,266 

 

4,022 

 

5,288 

 

(77)

 

2004

 

04/17/2014

Junior Colleges

 

Middletown

 

OH

 

 

 

404 

 

5,441 

 

- 

 

375 

 

404 

 

5,816 

 

6,220 

 

(125)

 

1969

 

04/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Gastonia

 

NC

 

 

 

184 

 

1,212 

 

- 

 

- 

 

184 

 

1,212 

 

1,396 

 

(30)

 

2003

 

04/25/2014

Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

 

Rapid City

 

SD

 

 

 

812 

 

1,211 

 

- 

 

- 

 

812 

 

1,211 

 

2,023 

 

(36)

 

1992

 

04/30/2014

Offices of Physicians

 

Jupiter

 

FL

 

 

 

742 

 

5,525 

 

- 

 

- 

 

742 

 

5,525 

 

6,267 

 

(114)

 

2007

 

05/02/2014

Home Furnishings Stores

 

Columbus

 

OH

 

 

 

753 

 

1,047 

 

- 

 

- 

 

753 

 

1,047 

 

1,800 

 

(24)

 

2014

 

05/07/2014

Forging and Stamping

 

Pharr

 

TX

 

 

 

1,343 

 

1,863 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,343 

 

1,863 

 

3,206 

 

(49)

 

1999

 

05/07/2014

Forging and Stamping

 

Clearwater

 

FL

 

 

 

1,529 

 

6,239 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,529 

 

6,239 

 

7,768 

 

(155)

 

1994

 

05/15/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Schaumburg

 

IL

 

 

 

2,063 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,664 

 

2,063 

 

2,664 

 

4,727 

 

 

 

 

05/15/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Cincinnati

 

OH

 

(f)

 

537 

 

1,765 

 

- 

 

- 

 

537 

 

1,765 

 

2,302 

 

(35)

 

2004

 

05/15/2014

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Lake Worth

 

TX

 

 

 

2,009 

 

- 

 

1,280 

 

4,590 

 

3,289 

 

4,590 

 

7,879 

 

(29)

 

2014

 

05/21/2014

Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

 

Tucson

 

AZ

 

 

 

1,107 

 

932 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,107 

 

932 

 

2,039 

 

(31)

 

1980

 

05/22/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Florence

 

AL

 

 

 

492 

 

634 

 

- 

 

- 

 

492 

 

634 

 

1,126 

 

(12)

 

2004

 

05/23/2014

Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

 

Scottsdale

 

AZ

 

 

 

821 

 

1,285 

 

- 

 

- 

 

821 

 

1,285 

 

2,106 

 

(28)

 

2006

 

05/23/2014

Bakeries and Tortilla Manufacturing

 

West Monroe

 

LA

 

 

 

902 

 

3,827 

 

- 

 

- 

 

902 

 

3,827 

 

4,729 

 

(102)

 

2004

 

05/23/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Lenoir

 

NC

 

 

 

548 

 

578 

 

- 

 

- 

 

548 

 

578 

 

1,126 

 

(11)

 

2005

 

05/23/2014

Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

 

Waxhaw

 

NC

 

 

 

570 

 

934 

 

- 

 

- 

 

570 

 

934 

 

1,504 

 

(24)

 

1968

 

05/23/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Lynchburg

 

VA

 

 

 

259 

 

865 

 

- 

 

- 

 

259 

 

865 

 

1,124 

 

(14)

 

1961

 

05/23/2014

Grocery Stores

 

Lodi

 

CA

 

 

 

1,431 

 

7,215 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,431 

 

7,215 

 

8,646 

 

(123)

 

2004

 

05/30/2014

Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

 

Henderson

 

CO

 

 

 

1,283 

 

1,448 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,283 

 

1,448 

 

2,731 

 

(47)

 

1980

 

05/30/2014

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Flower Mound

 

TX

 

 

 

1,860 

 

442 

 

- 

 

3,697 

 

1,860 

 

4,139 

 

5,999 

 

 

 

 

05/30/2014

Other General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing

 

Saltillo

 

MS

 

 

 

605 

 

15,409 

 

- 

 

- 

 

605 

 

15,409 

 

16,014 

 

(314)

 

1974

 

06/05/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Shawnee

 

OK

 

 

 

192 

 

1,016 

 

- 

 

- 

 

192 

 

1,016 

 

1,208 

 

(19)

 

1982

 

06/06/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

San Antonio

 

TX

 

 

 

1,578 

 

1,632 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,578 

 

1,632 

 

3,210 

 

(29)

 

2008

 

06/06/2014

F-15


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Forging and Stamping

 

Wickliffe

 

OH

 

 

 

617 

 

2,725 

 

- 

 

- 

 

617 

 

2,725 

 

3,342 

 

(84)

 

1958

 

06/12/2014

Other Support Services

 

Mills River

 

NC

 

 

 

1,027 

 

2,862 

 

- 

 

2,139 

 

1,027 

 

5,001 

 

6,028 

 

(36)

 

2001

 

06/16/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Columbus

 

GA

 

 

 

377 

 

1,007 

 

- 

 

- 

 

377 

 

1,007 

 

1,384 

 

(16)

 

2014

 

06/19/2014

Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing

 

Buford

 

GA

 

 

 

2,680 

 

24,103 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,680 

 

24,103 

 

26,783 

 

(323)

 

1998

 

06/20/2014

Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing

 

Buford

 

GA

 

 

 

225 

 

2,681 

 

- 

 

- 

 

225 

 

2,681 

 

2,906 

 

(47)

 

1993

 

06/20/2014

Support Activities for Air Transportation

 

East Alton

 

IL

 

 

 

1,710 

 

7,126 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,710 

 

7,126 

 

8,836 

 

(133)

 

1988

 

06/20/2014

Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing

 

North Attleboro

 

MA

 

 

 

1,541 

 

8,900 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,541 

 

8,900 

 

10,441 

 

(127)

 

1981

 

06/20/2014

Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors

 

Indian Trail

 

NC

 

 

 

526 

 

311 

 

- 

 

- 

 

526 

 

311 

 

837 

 

(8)

 

1968

 

06/20/2014

Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors

 

Amarillo

 

TX

 

 

 

269 

 

457 

 

- 

 

- 

 

269 

 

457 

 

726 

 

(6)

 

1954

 

06/20/2014

Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors

 

Humble

 

TX

 

 

 

269 

 

467 

 

- 

 

- 

 

269 

 

467 

 

736 

 

(9)

 

1982

 

06/20/2014

Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors

 

Milwaukee

 

WI

 

 

 

515 

 

3,318 

 

- 

 

- 

 

515 

 

3,318 

 

3,833 

 

(61)

 

1968

 

06/20/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Calumet City

 

IL

 

 

 

521 

 

983 

 

- 

 

- 

 

521 

 

983 

 

1,504 

 

(20)

 

1983

 

06/23/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lansing

 

IL

 

 

 

406 

 

877 

 

- 

 

- 

 

406 

 

877 

 

1,283 

 

(25)

 

1973

 

06/23/2014

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Ballwin

 

MO

 

 

 

696 

 

1,814 

 

- 

 

- 

 

696 

 

1,814 

 

2,510 

 

(35)

 

1977

 

06/23/2014

Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Manufacturing

 

Peachtree Corners

 

GA

 

 

 

400 

 

3,768 

 

- 

 

- 

 

400 

 

3,768 

 

4,168 

 

(98)

 

1986

 

06/24/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Rockford

 

IL

 

 

 

239 

 

409 

 

- 

 

- 

 

239 

 

409 

 

648 

 

(13)

 

1993

 

06/24/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Beloit

 

WI

 

 

 

218 

 

528 

 

- 

 

- 

 

218 

 

528 

 

746 

 

(16)

 

1983

 

06/24/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Mauston

 

WI

 

 

 

226 

 

432 

 

- 

 

- 

 

226 

 

432 

 

658 

 

(14)

 

2000

 

06/24/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Monroe

 

WI

 

 

 

344 

 

711 

 

- 

 

- 

 

344 

 

711 

 

1,055 

 

(18)

 

1977

 

06/24/2014

Other Personal Services

 

Lexington

 

KY

 

 

 

943 

 

1,967 

 

- 

 

- 

 

943 

 

1,967 

 

2,910 

 

(31)

 

2005

 

06/25/2014

Electrical Equipment Manufacturing

 

Chattanooga

 

TN

 

 

 

1,419 

 

5,648 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,419 

 

5,648 

 

7,067 

 

(105)

 

1960

 

06/25/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

 

 

310 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,710 

 

310 

 

2,710 

 

3,020 

 

 

 

 

06/26/2014

Warehousing and Storage

 

Perth Amboy

 

NJ

 

18,956

 

6,396 

 

23,189 

 

- 

 

- 

 

6,396 

 

23,189 

 

29,585 

 

(428)

 

1955

 

06/26/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Anderson Township

 

OH

 

(f)

 

273 

 

829 

 

- 

 

- 

 

273 

 

829 

 

1,102 

 

(18)

 

1995

 

06/26/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Forney

 

TX

 

 

 

511 

 

2,785 

 

- 

 

- 

 

511 

 

2,785 

 

3,296 

 

(36)

 

2004

 

06/26/2014

Health Clubs

 

Oakdale

 

CA

 

 

 

1,073 

 

4,560 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,073 

 

4,560 

 

5,633 

 

(87)

 

1973

 

06/27/2014

Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

 

Orlando

 

FL

 

 

 

461 

 

385 

 

- 

 

- 

 

461 

 

385 

 

846 

 

(9)

 

1998

 

06/27/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Saint Martinville

 

LA

 

(f)

 

264 

 

921 

 

- 

 

- 

 

264 

 

921 

 

1,185 

 

(26)

 

1987

 

06/27/2014

Health Clubs

 

Chanhassen

 

MN

 

 

 

511 

 

2,168 

 

- 

 

- 

 

511 

 

2,168 

 

2,679 

 

(30)

 

1999

 

06/27/2014

Health Clubs

 

Maple Grove

 

MN

 

 

 

1,372 

 

1,386 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,372 

 

1,386 

 

2,758 

 

(43)

 

2001

 

06/27/2014

Health Clubs

 

Chapel Hill

 

NC

 

 

 

1,198 

 

1,926 

 

- 

 

21 

 

1,198 

 

1,947 

 

3,145 

 

(45)

 

2005

 

06/30/2014

Health Clubs

 

Hanahan

 

SC

 

 

 

412 

 

722 

 

- 

 

- 

 

412 

 

722 

 

1,134 

 

(15)

 

2008

 

06/30/2014

Health Clubs

 

Mount Pleasant

 

SC

 

 

 

1,615 

 

1,943 

 

- 

 

111 

 

1,615 

 

2,054 

 

3,669 

 

(31)

 

1985

 

06/30/2014

Health Clubs

 

Mount Pleasant

 

SC

 

 

 

1,427 

 

3,281 

 

- 

 

60 

 

1,427 

 

3,341 

 

4,768 

 

(46)

 

2004

 

06/30/2014

Health Clubs

 

Mount Pleasant

 

SC

 

 

 

670 

 

904 

 

- 

 

- 

 

670 

 

904 

 

1,574 

 

(18)

 

1998

 

06/30/2014

Health Clubs

 

North Charleston

 

SC

 

 

 

1,618 

 

800 

 

- 

 

226 

 

1,618 

 

1,026 

 

2,644 

 

(20)

 

1986

 

06/30/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Colorado Springs

 

CO

 

 

 

855 

 

1,851 

 

- 

 

- 

 

855 

 

1,851 

 

2,706 

 

(23)

 

2008

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Loveland

 

CO

 

 

 

629 

 

1,005 

 

- 

 

- 

 

629 

 

1,005 

 

1,634 

 

(17)

 

2003

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Cartersville

 

GA

 

 

 

343 

 

601 

 

- 

 

 

343 

 

605 

 

948 

 

(11)

 

1997

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Kennesaw

 

GA

 

 

 

557 

 

714 

 

- 

 

 

557 

 

717 

 

1,274 

 

(12)

 

1997

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Norcross

 

GA

 

 

 

487 

 

521 

 

- 

 

- 

 

487 

 

521 

 

1,008 

 

(9)

 

1988

 

07/24/2014

F-16


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Child Day Care Services

 

Stockbridge

 

GA

 

 

 

426 

 

891 

 

- 

 

 

426 

 

899 

 

1,325 

 

(15)

 

1997

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Tucker

 

GA

 

 

 

450 

 

585 

 

- 

 

- 

 

450 

 

585 

 

1,035 

 

(10)

 

1994

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Woodstock

 

GA

 

 

 

537 

 

299 

 

- 

 

 

537 

 

305 

 

842 

 

(6)

 

1992

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Charlotte

 

NC

 

 

 

625 

 

783 

 

- 

 

- 

 

625 

 

783 

 

1,408 

 

(14)

 

2001

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greensboro

 

NC

 

 

 

325 

 

193 

 

- 

 

- 

 

325 

 

193 

 

518 

 

(4)

 

1983

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greensboro

 

NC

 

 

 

628 

 

244 

 

- 

 

 

628 

 

250 

 

878 

 

(5)

 

1968

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greensboro

 

NC

 

 

 

330 

 

360 

 

- 

 

 

330 

 

367 

 

697 

 

(6)

 

1970

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greensboro

 

NC

 

 

 

500 

 

300 

 

- 

 

- 

 

500 

 

300 

 

800 

 

(6)

 

1978

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greensboro

 

NC

 

 

 

544 

 

173 

 

- 

 

 

544 

 

175 

 

719 

 

(4)

 

1981

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Winston Salem

 

NC

 

 

 

519 

 

361 

 

- 

 

 

519 

 

366 

 

885 

 

(8)

 

1969

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Winston Salem

 

NC

 

 

 

364 

 

517 

 

- 

 

- 

 

364 

 

517 

 

881 

 

(9)

 

1983

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Aiken

 

SC

 

 

 

164 

 

508 

 

- 

 

 

164 

 

515 

 

679 

 

(9)

 

1985

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Aiken

 

SC

 

 

 

281 

 

563 

 

- 

 

- 

 

281 

 

563 

 

844 

 

(11)

 

1992

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Duncan

 

SC

 

 

 

428 

 

326 

 

- 

 

13 

 

428 

 

339 

 

767 

 

(9)

 

1997

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Florence

 

SC

 

 

 

147 

 

489 

 

- 

 

 

147 

 

490 

 

637 

 

(8)

 

1983

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greenwood

 

SC

 

 

 

317 

 

183 

 

- 

 

- 

 

317 

 

183 

 

500 

 

(4)

 

1978

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greenwood

 

SC

 

 

 

367 

 

396 

 

- 

 

 

367 

 

404 

 

771 

 

(8)

 

1984

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greer

 

SC

 

 

 

125 

 

633 

 

- 

 

- 

 

125 

 

633 

 

758 

 

(11)

 

2002

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Mauldin

 

SC

 

 

 

296 

 

231 

 

- 

 

 

296 

 

235 

 

531 

 

(5)

 

1981

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

North Augusta

 

SC

 

 

 

257 

 

561 

 

- 

 

 

257 

 

563 

 

820 

 

(10)

 

1983

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

North Charleston

 

SC

 

 

 

272 

 

300 

 

- 

 

- 

 

272 

 

300 

 

572 

 

(6)

 

1987

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Spartanburg

 

SC

 

 

 

334 

 

293 

 

- 

 

- 

 

334 

 

293 

 

627 

 

(6)

 

1987

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Spartanburg

 

SC

 

 

 

185 

 

560 

 

- 

 

- 

 

185 

 

560 

 

745 

 

(9)

 

1973

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Summerville

 

SC

 

 

 

678 

 

185 

 

- 

 

 

678 

 

188 

 

866 

 

(4)

 

1984

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Frisco

 

TX

 

 

 

509 

 

1,253 

 

- 

 

19 

 

509 

 

1,272 

 

1,781 

 

(15)

 

1996

 

07/24/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Little Elm

 

TX

 

 

 

454 

 

1,018 

 

- 

 

15 

 

454 

 

1,033 

 

1,487 

 

(16)

 

1989

 

07/24/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Torrington

 

CT

 

(f)

 

401 

 

495 

 

- 

 

- 

 

401 

 

495 

 

896 

 

(9)

 

1993

 

07/29/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Wethersfield

 

CT

 

(f)

 

427 

 

628 

 

- 

 

- 

 

427 

 

628 

 

1,055 

 

(11)

 

2008

 

07/29/2014

Boiler, Tank, and Shipping Container Manufacturing

 

Anderson

 

SC

 

 

 

369 

 

1,015 

 

- 

 

- 

 

369 

 

1,015 

 

1,384 

 

(17)

 

1994

 

07/29/2014

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Rothschild

 

WI

 

 

 

2,440 

 

10,171 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,440 

 

10,171 

 

12,611 

 

(129)

 

2003

 

07/29/2014

Drugs and Druggists' Sundries Merchant Wholesalers

 

Knoxville

 

TN

 

 

 

1,421 

 

7,109 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,421 

 

7,109 

 

8,530 

 

(105)

 

1983

 

07/30/2014

Electronics and Appliance Stores

 

Phoenix

 

AZ

 

 

 

3,480 

 

3,209 

 

- 

 

- 

 

3,480 

 

3,209 

 

6,689 

 

(43)

 

1988

 

07/31/2014

Electronics and Appliance Stores

 

Colorado Springs

 

CO

 

 

 

2,223 

 

4,197 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,223 

 

4,197 

 

6,420 

 

(12)

 

1995

 

07/31/2014

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Berlin

 

CT

 

 

 

2,937 

 

6,719 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,937 

 

6,719 

 

9,656 

 

(129)

 

1990

 

07/31/2014

Lessors of Real Estate

 

Sugar Hill

 

GA

 

 

 

1,658 

 

4,507 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,658 

 

4,507 

 

6,165 

 

(79)

 

2013

 

07/31/2014

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Springfield

 

MO

 

 

 

2,299 

 

7,487 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,299 

 

7,487 

 

9,786 

 

(90)

 

1990

 

07/31/2014

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Ridgefield Park

 

NJ

 

 

 

44 

 

10,848 

 

- 

 

- 

 

44 

 

10,848 

 

10,892 

 

(152)

 

1991

 

07/31/2014

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Boerne

 

TX

 

 

 

4,186 

 

3,413 

 

- 

 

- 

 

4,186 

 

3,413 

 

7,599 

 

(79)

 

2013

 

07/31/2014

Lessors of Real Estate

 

Corinth

 

TX

 

 

 

2,517 

 

4,173 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,517 

 

4,173 

 

6,690 

 

(72)

 

2009

 

07/31/2014

Lessors of Real Estate

 

Houston

 

TX

 

 

 

2,650 

 

3,644 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,650 

 

3,644 

 

6,294 

 

(66)

 

2005

 

07/31/2014

Electronics and Appliance Stores

 

Lubbock

 

TX

 

 

 

2,220 

 

4,148 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,220 

 

4,148 

 

6,368 

 

(46)

 

2014

 

07/31/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Monroe

 

NC

 

 

 

753 

 

1,560 

 

- 

 

- 

 

753 

 

1,560 

 

2,313 

 

(24)

 

2000

 

08/08/2014

Furniture Stores

 

Portland

 

OR

 

 

 

1,693 

 

1,769 

 

- 

 

236 

 

1,693 

 

2,005 

 

3,698 

 

(24)

 

1997

 

08/08/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

McDonough

 

GA

 

 

 

310 

 

812 

 

- 

 

- 

 

310 

 

812 

 

1,122 

 

(12)

 

1999

 

08/11/2014

Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

 

Tucson

 

AZ

 

 

 

1,200 

 

5,810 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,200 

 

5,810 

 

7,010 

 

(56)

 

2004

 

08/21/2014

Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

 

Baltimore

 

MD

 

 

 

1,235 

 

1,347 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,235 

 

1,347 

 

2,582 

 

(23)

 

1950

 

08/28/2014

Furniture Stores

 

Memphis

 

TN

 

(f)

 

1,367 

 

3,771 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,367 

 

3,771 

 

5,138 

 

(36)

 

2005

 

09/02/2014

F-17


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Child Day Care Services

 

Huntersville

 

NC

 

 

 

1,118 

 

1,719 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,118 

 

1,719 

 

2,837 

 

(16)

 

2006

 

09/05/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Immokalee

 

FL

 

(f)

 

548 

 

686 

 

- 

 

- 

 

548 

 

686 

 

1,234 

 

(7)

 

1999

 

09/09/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Lewiston

 

ID

 

 

 

390 

 

996 

 

- 

 

- 

 

390 

 

996 

 

1,386 

 

(14)

 

2008

 

09/10/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Hardin

 

MT

 

 

 

45 

 

513 

 

- 

 

- 

 

45 

 

513 

 

558 

 

(9)

 

1920

 

09/10/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Moses Lake

 

WA

 

 

 

459 

 

1,034 

 

- 

 

- 

 

459 

 

1,034 

 

1,493 

 

(15)

 

2009

 

09/10/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Casper

 

WY

 

 

 

506 

 

846 

 

- 

 

- 

 

506 

 

846 

 

1,352 

 

(12)

 

2009

 

09/10/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

 

 

25 

 

2,769 

 

- 

 

- 

 

25 

 

2,769 

 

2,794 

 

(31)

 

1926

 

09/15/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Puyallup

 

WA

 

(f)

 

743 

 

392 

 

- 

 

- 

 

743 

 

392 

 

1,135 

 

(7)

 

1982

 

09/16/2014

Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

 

Albany

 

GA

 

 

 

176 

 

438 

 

- 

 

- 

 

176 

 

438 

 

614 

 

(5)

 

1974

 

09/17/2014

Health Clubs

 

Southaven

 

MS

 

 

 

2,264 

 

3,039 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,264 

 

3,039 

 

5,303 

 

(35)

 

1999

 

09/18/2014

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Parker

 

CO

 

3,807

 

1,773 

 

4,252 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,773 

 

4,252 

 

6,025 

 

(41)

 

2002

 

09/23/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Morristown

 

TN

 

 

 

552 

 

958 

 

- 

 

- 

 

552 

 

958 

 

1,510 

 

(10)

 

1987

 

09/23/2014

Other Ambulatory Health Care Services

 

Birmingham

 

AL

 

 

 

316 

 

1,628 

 

- 

 

- 

 

316 

 

1,628 

 

1,944 

 

(11)

 

2008

 

09/24/2014

Other Ambulatory Health Care Services

 

Glendale

 

AZ

 

 

 

357 

 

3,099 

 

- 

 

- 

 

357 

 

3,099 

 

3,456 

 

(21)

 

1982

 

09/24/2014

Other Ambulatory Health Care Services

 

Glendale

 

AZ

 

 

 

283 

 

1,510 

 

- 

 

- 

 

283 

 

1,510 

 

1,793 

 

(14)

 

1985

 

09/24/2014

Other Ambulatory Health Care Services

 

Council Bluffs

 

IA

 

 

 

946 

 

2,010 

 

- 

 

- 

 

946 

 

2,010 

 

2,956 

 

(17)

 

2009

 

09/24/2014

Other Ambulatory Health Care Services

 

Rexburg

 

ID

 

 

 

139 

 

1,204 

 

- 

 

- 

 

139 

 

1,204 

 

1,343 

 

(10)

 

1976

 

09/24/2014

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Forest Lake

 

MN

 

 

 

5,403 

 

7,570 

 

- 

 

- 

 

5,403 

 

7,570 

 

12,973 

 

(69)

 

2003

 

09/24/2014

Other Ambulatory Health Care Services

 

Cleveland

 

OH

 

 

 

274 

 

1,990 

 

- 

 

- 

 

274 

 

1,990 

 

2,264 

 

(15)

 

2009

 

09/24/2014

Other Ambulatory Health Care Services

 

Fort Worth

 

TX

 

 

 

1,584 

 

2,053 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,584 

 

2,053 

 

3,637 

 

(15)

 

2009

 

09/24/2014

Other Ambulatory Health Care Services

 

Salt Lake City

 

UT

 

 

 

543 

 

649 

 

- 

 

- 

 

543 

 

649 

 

1,192 

 

(6)

 

1972

 

09/24/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Fort Myers

 

FL

 

 

 

1,373 

 

1,946 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,373 

 

1,946 

 

3,319 

 

(18)

 

1977

 

09/25/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Bangor

 

ME

 

 

 

506 

 

547 

 

- 

 

- 

 

506 

 

547 

 

1,053 

 

(6)

 

2006

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Ellsworth

 

ME

 

 

 

249 

 

552 

 

- 

 

- 

 

249 

 

552 

 

801 

 

(8)

 

1979

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Farmington

 

ME

 

 

 

365 

 

648 

 

- 

 

- 

 

365 

 

648 

 

1,013 

 

(7)

 

1993

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Presque Isle

 

ME

 

 

 

172 

 

416 

 

- 

 

- 

 

172 

 

416 

 

588 

 

(7)

 

1980

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Concord

 

NH

 

 

 

563 

 

359 

 

- 

 

- 

 

563 

 

359 

 

922 

 

(6)

 

1973

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Dover

 

NH

 

 

 

832 

 

678 

 

- 

 

- 

 

832 

 

678 

 

1,510 

 

(10)

 

1979

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Littleton

 

NH

 

 

 

418 

 

362 

 

- 

 

- 

 

418 

 

362 

 

780 

 

(6)

 

1981

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Nashua

 

NH

 

 

 

508 

 

668 

 

- 

 

- 

 

508 

 

668 

 

1,176 

 

(7)

 

2006

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Galloway

 

NJ

 

 

 

819 

 

498 

 

- 

 

- 

 

819 

 

498 

 

1,317 

 

(7)

 

1991

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Bennington

 

VT

 

 

 

480 

 

482 

 

- 

 

- 

 

480 

 

482 

 

962 

 

(7)

 

1998

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Rutland

 

VT

 

 

 

475 

 

346 

 

- 

 

- 

 

475 

 

346 

 

821 

 

(5)

 

1983

 

09/29/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Eden Prairie

 

MN

 

(f)

 

1,252 

 

2,873 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,252 

 

2,873 

 

4,125 

 

(21)

 

1994

 

09/30/2014

Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

 

Watertown

 

SD

 

 

 

2,425 

 

7,933 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,425 

 

7,933 

 

10,358 

 

(82)

 

2014

 

09/30/2014

Building Material and Supplies Dealers

 

Columbus

 

OH

 

 

 

1,475 

 

3,704 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,475 

 

3,704 

 

5,179 

 

(59)

 

1994

 

10/03/2014

Junior Colleges

 

Warren

 

OH

 

 

 

194 

 

340 

 

- 

 

896 

 

194 

 

1,236 

 

1,430 

 

(3)

 

1968

 

10/03/2014

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Bentonville

 

AR

 

 

 

872 

 

664 

 

- 

 

- 

 

872 

 

664 

 

1,536 

 

(7)

 

2014

 

10/22/2014

Health Clubs

 

Carmichael

 

CA

 

 

 

1,301 

 

3,840 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,301 

 

3,840 

 

5,141 

 

(25)

 

1977

 

10/31/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Indianapolis

 

IN

 

 

 

468 

 

1,570 

 

- 

 

- 

 

468 

 

1,570 

 

2,038 

 

(10)

 

1985

 

10/31/2014

Grantmaking and Giving Services

 

Shawnee

 

OK

 

 

 

624 

 

1,294 

 

- 

 

- 

 

624 

 

1,294 

 

1,918 

 

(8)

 

2011

 

11/12/2014

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

LaVista

 

NE

 

 

 

807 

 

251 

 

- 

 

1,218 

 

807 

 

1,469 

 

2,276 

 

- 

 

 

 

11/14/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Collierville

 

TN

 

 

 

544 

 

1,986 

 

- 

 

- 

 

544 

 

1,986 

 

2,530 

 

(12)

 

1999

 

11/14/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Collierville

 

TN

 

 

 

579 

 

1,316 

 

- 

 

- 

 

579 

 

1,316 

 

1,895 

 

(7)

 

2009

 

11/14/2014

Furniture Stores

 

Wichita Falls

 

TX

 

 

 

1,198 

 

5,038 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,198 

 

5,038 

 

6,236 

 

(12)

 

2006

 

11/19/2014

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Battle Creek

 

MI

 

 

 

593 

 

777 

 

- 

 

- 

 

593 

 

777 

 

1,370 

 

(2)

 

2014

 

11/20/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Stockbridge

 

GA

 

 

 

206 

 

315 

 

- 

 

213 

 

206 

 

528 

 

734 

 

(1)

 

2006

 

11/21/2014

F-18


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing

 

Grove City

 

OH

 

 

 

605 

 

1,207 

 

- 

 

154 

 

605 

 

1,361 

 

1,966 

 

(3)

 

1979

 

11/25/2014

Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing

 

Fort Worth

 

TX

 

 

 

451 

 

2,513 

 

- 

 

- 

 

451 

 

2,513 

 

2,964 

 

(7)

 

1967

 

11/25/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

 

 

666 

 

2,275 

 

- 

 

- 

 

666 

 

2,275 

 

2,941 

 

(5)

 

1898

 

11/26/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

 

 

1,130 

 

3,699 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,130 

 

3,699 

 

4,829 

 

(8)

 

1908

 

11/26/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

 

 

1,697 

 

3,360 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,697 

 

3,360 

 

5,057 

 

(7)

 

1892

 

11/26/2014

Motor Vehicle and Motor Vehicle Parts and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

 

Mechanicsburg

 

PA

 

(f)

 

9,019 

 

1,771 

 

- 

 

- 

 

9,019 

 

1,771 

 

10,790 

 

(19)

 

1980

 

12/05/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Bessemer

 

AL

 

 

 

517 

 

830 

 

- 

 

- 

 

517 

 

830 

 

1,347 

 

(3)

 

1994

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Birmingham

 

AL

 

 

 

701 

 

706 

 

- 

 

- 

 

701 

 

706 

 

1,407 

 

(3)

 

1991

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Birmingham

 

AL

 

 

 

726 

 

752 

 

- 

 

- 

 

726 

 

752 

 

1,478 

 

(3)

 

2002

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Birmingham

 

AL

 

 

 

566 

 

841 

 

- 

 

- 

 

566 

 

841 

 

1,407 

 

(3)

 

1995

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Birmingham

 

AL

 

 

 

265 

 

633 

 

- 

 

- 

 

265 

 

633 

 

898 

 

(2)

 

1980

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Birmingham

 

AL

 

 

 

240 

 

559 

 

- 

 

- 

 

240 

 

559 

 

799 

 

(2)

 

1989

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Birmingham

 

AL

 

 

 

334 

 

764 

 

- 

 

- 

 

334 

 

764 

 

1,098 

 

(3)

 

1989

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Decatur

 

AL

 

 

 

235 

 

1,012 

 

- 

 

- 

 

235 

 

1,012 

 

1,247 

 

(3)

 

1996

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Fairfield

 

AL

 

 

 

583 

 

765 

 

- 

 

- 

 

583 

 

765 

 

1,348 

 

(3)

 

1995

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Forestdale

 

AL

 

 

 

559 

 

769 

 

- 

 

- 

 

559 

 

769 

 

1,328 

 

(3)

 

1991

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Gardendale

 

AL

 

 

 

915 

 

492 

 

- 

 

- 

 

915 

 

492 

 

1,407 

 

(2)

 

1988

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Hueytown

 

AL

 

 

 

886 

 

282 

 

- 

 

- 

 

886 

 

282 

 

1,168 

 

(2)

 

1988

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Huntsville

 

AL

 

 

 

368 

 

910 

 

- 

 

- 

 

368 

 

910 

 

1,278 

 

(3)

 

1976

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Huntsville

 

AL

 

 

 

404 

 

873 

 

- 

 

- 

 

404 

 

873 

 

1,277 

 

(3)

 

2004

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Madison

 

AL

 

 

 

511 

 

756 

 

- 

 

- 

 

511 

 

756 

 

1,267 

 

(3)

 

1986

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Madison

 

AL

 

 

 

468 

 

1,009 

 

- 

 

- 

 

468 

 

1,009 

 

1,477 

 

(4)

 

1999

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Meridianville

 

AL

 

 

 

598 

 

1,358 

 

- 

 

- 

 

598 

 

1,358 

 

1,956 

 

(5)

 

2001

 

12/10/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Scottsboro

 

AL

 

 

 

259 

 

899 

 

- 

 

- 

 

259 

 

899 

 

1,158 

 

(3)

 

1986

 

12/10/2014

Outpatient Care Centers

 

San Tan Valley

 

AZ

 

 

 

539 

 

294 

 

- 

 

- 

 

539 

 

294 

 

833 

 

- 

 

 

 

12/11/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Huntsville

 

AL

 

 

 

298 

 

1,187 

 

- 

 

- 

 

298 

 

1,187 

 

1,485 

 

(4)

 

1994

 

12/12/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Huntsville

 

AL

 

 

 

694 

 

1,181 

 

- 

 

- 

 

694 

 

1,181 

 

1,875 

 

(4)

 

2003

 

12/12/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

543 

 

893 

 

- 

 

- 

 

543 

 

893 

 

1,436 

 

(3)

 

2014

 

12/12/2014

Consumer Goods Rental

 

Jacksonville

 

FL

 

(f)

 

594 

 

1,276 

 

- 

 

- 

 

594 

 

1,276 

 

1,870 

 

(4)

 

2014

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

147 

 

252 

 

- 

 

- 

 

147 

 

252 

 

399 

 

(1)

 

2003

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

139 

 

280 

 

- 

 

- 

 

139 

 

280 

 

419 

 

(1)

 

1975

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

107 

 

351 

 

- 

 

- 

 

107 

 

351 

 

458 

 

(1)

 

1987

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

165 

 

194 

 

- 

 

- 

 

165 

 

194 

 

359 

 

(1)

 

1980

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

194 

 

255 

 

- 

 

- 

 

194 

 

255 

 

449 

 

(1)

 

1982

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

183 

 

256 

 

- 

 

- 

 

183 

 

256 

 

439 

 

(1)

 

1981

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

269 

 

180 

 

- 

 

- 

 

269 

 

180 

 

449 

 

(1)

 

1977

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

162 

 

197 

 

- 

 

- 

 

162 

 

197 

 

359 

 

(1)

 

1983

 

12/12/2014

Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

 

 

1,408 

 

2,891 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,408 

 

2,891 

 

4,299 

 

(9)

 

1990

 

12/12/2014

F-19


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Boise

 

ID

 

 

 

670 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

670 

 

-

 

670 

 

 

2000

 

12/15/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Boise

 

ID

 

 

 

610 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

610 

 

-

 

610 

 

 

2003

 

12/15/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Emmett

 

ID

 

 

 

350 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

350 

 

-

 

350 

 

 

2006

 

12/15/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Garden City

 

ID

 

 

 

410 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

410 

 

-

 

410 

 

 

2005

 

12/15/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Meridian

 

ID

 

 

 

490 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

490 

 

-

 

490 

 

 

2003

 

12/15/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Nampa

 

ID

 

 

 

480 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

480 

 

-

 

480 

 

 

2006

 

12/15/2014

Restaurants – Limited Service

 

Nampa

 

ID

 

 

 

410 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

410 

 

-

 

410 

 

 

2006

 

12/15/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

 

 

2,298 

 

2,425 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,298 

 

2,425 

 

4,723 

 

(5)

 

1911

 

12/15/2014

Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing

 

Greenfield

 

MA

 

 

 

655 

 

5,499 

 

- 

 

- 

 

655 

 

5,499 

 

6,154 

 

 

1999

 

12/16/2014

Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing

 

Greenfield

 

MA

 

 

 

300 

 

1,831 

 

- 

 

- 

 

300 

 

1,831 

 

2,131 

 

 

1989

 

12/16/2014

Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing

 

Greenfield

 

MA

 

 

 

195 

 

1,406 

 

- 

 

- 

 

195 

 

1,406 

 

1,601 

 

 

1986

 

12/16/2014

Health and Personal Care Stores

 

Elizabethtown

 

NY

 

 

 

89 

 

2,305 

 

- 

 

- 

 

89 

 

2,305 

 

2,394 

 

 

1972

 

12/16/2014

Health and Personal Care Stores

 

Syracuse

 

NY

 

 

 

357 

 

1,610 

 

- 

 

- 

 

357 

 

1,610 

 

1,967 

 

 

1986

 

12/16/2014

Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors

 

Chandler

 

AZ

 

 

 

1,884 

 

6,218 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,884 

 

6,218 

 

8,102 

 

 

2010

 

12/17/2014

Outpatient Care Centers

 

Jackson

 

MI

 

 

 

490 

 

1,290 

 

- 

 

- 

 

490 

 

1,290 

 

1,780 

 

 

2014

 

12/18/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Woodbury

 

MN

 

 

 

2,758 

 

2,275 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,758 

 

2,275 

 

5,033 

 

 

2008

 

12/18/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Portage

 

IN

 

 

 

1,406 

 

2,351 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,406 

 

2,351 

 

3,757 

 

 

2007

 

12/19/2014

Motion Picture and Video Industries

 

Nicholasville

 

KY

 

 

 

4,505 

 

3,506 

 

- 

 

- 

 

4,505 

 

3,506 

 

8,011 

 

 

2005

 

12/19/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Bakersfield

 

CA

 

 

 

923 

 

3,686 

 

- 

 

- 

 

923 

 

3,686 

 

4,609 

 

 

1986

 

12/22/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Albemarle

 

NC

 

 

 

419 

 

482 

 

- 

 

- 

 

419 

 

482 

 

901 

 

 

1998

 

12/22/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Lenior

 

NC

 

 

 

537 

 

454 

 

- 

 

- 

 

537 

 

454 

 

991 

 

 

1997

 

12/22/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Mt. Airy

 

NC

 

 

 

331 

 

450 

 

- 

 

- 

 

331 

 

450 

 

781 

 

 

1996

 

12/22/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Sanford

 

NC

 

 

 

323 

 

479 

 

- 

 

- 

 

323 

 

479 

 

802 

 

 

1997

 

12/22/2014

Restaurants – Full Service

 

Winston-Salem

 

NC

 

 

 

281 

 

430 

 

- 

 

- 

 

281 

 

430 

 

711 

 

 

1995

 

12/22/2014

Grocery Stores

 

Hot Springs Village

 

AR

 

 

 

362 

 

1,299 

 

- 

 

- 

 

362 

 

1,299 

 

1,661 

 

 

1991

 

12/23/2014

Grocery Stores

 

Redfield

 

AR

 

 

 

415 

 

333 

 

- 

 

- 

 

415 

 

333 

 

748 

 

 

1999

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Bremen

 

GA

 

 

 

550 

 

488 

 

- 

 

- 

 

550 

 

488 

 

1,038 

 

 

2005

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

McDonough

 

GA

 

 

 

1,826 

 

748 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,826 

 

748 

 

2,574 

 

 

2006

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Villa Rica

 

GA

 

 

 

665 

 

792 

 

- 

 

- 

 

665 

 

792 

 

1,457 

 

 

2004

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Villa Rica

 

GA

 

 

 

855 

 

783 

 

- 

 

- 

 

855 

 

783 

 

1,638 

 

 

1999

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Elkin

 

NC

 

 

 

278 

 

768 

 

- 

 

- 

 

278 

 

768 

 

1,046 

 

 

1995

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Greensboro

 

NC

 

 

 

725 

 

421 

 

- 

 

- 

 

725 

 

421 

 

1,146 

 

 

1994

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

High Point

 

NC

 

 

 

462 

 

733 

 

- 

 

- 

 

462 

 

733 

 

1,195 

 

 

1996

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

King

 

NC

 

 

 

313 

 

882 

 

- 

 

- 

 

313 

 

882 

 

1,195 

 

 

2008

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Mount Airy

 

NC

 

 

 

176 

 

820 

 

- 

 

- 

 

176 

 

820 

 

996 

 

 

1999

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Mount Airy

 

NC

 

 

 

260 

 

737 

 

- 

 

- 

 

260 

 

737 

 

997 

 

 

2006

 

12/23/2014

Child Day Care Services

 

Mount Airy

 

NC

 

 

 

207 

 

739 

 

- 

 

- 

 

207 

 

739 

 

946 

 

 

1995

 

12/23/2014

Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing

 

Utica

 

NY

 

 

 

102 

 

988 

 

- 

 

- 

 

102 

 

988 

 

1,090 

 

 

1965

 

12/23/2014

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

North Canton

 

OH

 

 

 

1,574 

 

6,043 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,574 

 

6,043 

 

7,617 

 

 

1989

 

12/23/2014

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Springfield

 

OH

 

 

 

1,983 

 

2,437 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,983 

 

2,437 

 

4,420 

 

 

1984

 

12/23/2014

Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing

 

Warrensville Heights

 

OH

 

 

 

842 

 

767 

 

- 

 

- 

 

842 

 

767 

 

1,609 

 

 

1982

 

12/23/2014

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores

 

Monroeville

 

PA

 

 

 

1,621 

 

6,552 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,621 

 

6,552 

 

8,173 

 

 

1977

 

12/23/2014

F-20


 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Descriptions (a)

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

 

Gross amount at December 31, 2014 (b) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant Industry

  

City

  

St

  

Encumbrances

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Land &
Improvements

  

Building &
Improvements

  

Total

  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(d) (e)

  

Year
Constructed

  

Date
Acquired

Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing

 

Cookeville

 

TN

 

 

 

797 

 

3,689 

 

- 

 

- 

 

797 

 

3,689 

 

4,486 

 

 

1973

 

12/23/2014

Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing

 

Paris

 

IL

 

 

 

2,022 

 

4,907 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,022 

 

4,907 

 

6,929 

 

 

1993

 

12/29/2014

Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing

 

Hazelton

 

PA

 

 

 

1,400 

 

6,260 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,400 

 

6,260 

 

7,660 

 

 

1998

 

12/29/2014

Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing

 

Manchester

 

PA

 

 

 

1,489 

 

5,911 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,489 

 

5,911 

 

7,400 

 

 

1985

 

12/29/2014

Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools

 

Austin

 

TX

 

 

 

1,721 

 

7,175 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,721 

 

7,175 

 

8,896 

 

 

2012

 

12/29/2014

Freight Transportation Arrangement

 

Cartersville

 

GA

 

 

 

1,119 

 

6,093 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,119 

 

6,093 

 

7,212 

 

 

2000

 

12/31/2014

Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

 

Elmwood Park

 

IL

 

 

 

258 

 

1,027 

 

- 

 

- 

 

258 

 

1,027 

 

1,285 

 

 

1960

 

12/31/2014

Freight Transportation Arrangement

 

Spartanburg

 

SC

 

 

 

1,601 

 

8,716 

 

- 

 

- 

 

1,601 

 

8,716 

 

10,317 

 

 

1997

 

12/31/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$
197,822 

 

$
828,988 

 

$
1,705,467 

 

$
14,855 

 

$
85,063 

 

$
843,843 

 

$
1,790,530 

 

$
2,634,373 

 

$
(92,665)

 

 

 

 


(a)

As of December 31, 2014, we had investments in 943 single-tenant real estate property locations including 937 owned properties and six ground lease interests; eleven of our owned properties are accounted for as direct financing receivables and are excluded from  the table above.  Initial costs exclude intangible lease assets totaling $60.2 million.

(b)

The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is approximately $2,690.5 million.

(c)

The following is a reconciliation of total real estate carrying value for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

    

$

1,604,329 

    

$

862,419 

    

$

228,987 

 

Additions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

984,839 

 

 

762,664 

 

 

635,187 

 

Improvements

 

 

70,710 

 

 

25,848 

 

 

3,393 

 

Deductions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of real estate sold

 

 

(25,505)

 

 

(37,751)

 

 

(5,148)

 

Reclasses to held for sale

 

 

 

 

(8,851)

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

2,634,373 

 

$

1,604,329 

 

$

862,419 

 

 

(d)

The following is a reconciliation of accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

    

$

(40,578)

    

$

(11,811)

    

$

(979)

 

Additions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

(52,763)

 

 

(29,453)

 

 

(10,851)

 

Deductions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation associated with real estate sold

 

 

676 

 

 

380 

 

 

19 

 

Reclasses to held for sale

 

 

 

 

 

306 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

(92,665)

 

$

(40,578)

 

$

(11,811)

 

 

(e)

The Company's real estate assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the properties, which generally ranges from 30 to 40 years for buildings and improvements and is 15 years for land improvements.

(f)

Property is collateral for non-recourse debt obligations totaling $1.1 billion of STORE Master Funding I, LLC; STORE Master Funding II, LLC; STORE Master Funding III, LLC; STORE Master Funding IV, LLC and STORE Master Funding V, LLC,  all consolidated special purpose subsidiaries

 

 

F-21


 

Table of Contents

STORE Capital Corporation

Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

As of December 31, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Final

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

Outstanding

    

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

Maturity

 

Periodic Payment

 

 

 

 

 

face amount of

 

 amount of

 

Description

 

Interest Rate

 

Date

 

Terms

 

Final Payment Terms

 

Prior Liens

 

mortgages

 

mortgages (i)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service(a)

 

8.50 

%  

1/31/2015

 

Interest only

 

Balloon of $4.3 million

 

None

 

$

4,300 

 

$

4,302 

 

Restaurant(b)

 

9.09 

%  

1/1/2017

 

Interest only

 

Balloon of $1.9 million

 

None

 

 

1,933 

 

 

1,941 

 

Retail(c)

 

8.35 

%  

1/1/2028

 

Principal & Interest

 

Balloon of $3.5 million

 

None

 

 

3,775 

 

 

3,864 

 

Restaurant(d)

 

8.75 

%  

7/1/2032

 

Principal & Interest

 

Balloon of $20.4 million

 

None

 

 

23,998 

 

 

24,292 

 

Service(e)

 

9.00 

%  

3/31/2053

 

Principal & Interest

 

Fully amortizing

 

None

 

 

14,595 

 

 

14,605 

 

Service(f)

 

8.75 

%  

6/30/2053

 

Principal & Interest

 

Fully amortizing

 

None

 

 

6,357 

 

 

6,369 

 

Retail(g)

 

8.50 

%  

6/30/2053

 

Principal & Interest

 

Fully amortizing

 

None

 

 

6,697 

 

 

6,711 

 

Restaurant(h)

 

8.25 

%  

8/31/2053

 

Principal & Interest

 

Fully amortizing

 

None

 

 

3,337 

 

 

3,348 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

64,992 

 

$

65,432 

 

 

The following shows changes in the carrying amounts of mortgage loans receivable during the period (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 

 

 

    

2014

    

2013

    

2012

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

60,917 

 

$

36,345 

 

$

-

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New mortgage loans

 

 

6,689 

 

 

32,598 

 

 

35,895 

 

Other capitalized loan origination costs

 

 

34 

 

 

49 

 

 

482 

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collections of principal (j)

 

 

(2,159)

 

 

(8,008)

 

 

(23)

 

Amortization of loan origination costs

 

 

(49)

 

 

(67)

 

 

(9)

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

65,432 

 

$

60,917 

 

$

36,345 

 

 


(a)

The mortgage loan is secured by buildings and improvements to one property located in Kentucky.

(b)

The mortgage loan is secured by buildings and improvements to three properties located in North Carolina and South Carolina.

(c)

The mortgage loan is secured by buildings and improvements to two properties located in Pennsylvania.

(d)

The mortgage loan is secured by buildings and improvements to 29 properties located in Florida, Illinois, Louisiana and Mississippi.

(e)

The mortgage loan is secured by buildings and improvements to one property located in Kansas.

(f)

The mortgage loan is secured by buildings and improvements to two properties located in Alabama and Georgia.

(g)

The mortgage loan is secured by buildings and improvements to two properties located in Indiana.

(h)

The mortgage loan is secured by buildings and improvements to five properties located in Tennessee.

(i)

The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $65.4 million.

(j)

One mortgage loan was repaid in full during 2014 through a non-cash transaction in which the Company purchased the two underlying mortgaged properties and leased them back to the borrower. Similarly, during 2013, one mortgage loan receivable was repaid in full through a $7.9 million non-cash transaction in which the Company acquired the underlying mortgaged property and leased it back to the borrower.

F-22