Annual Statements Open main menu

TRUSTMARK CORP - Quarter Report: 2021 June (Form 10-Q)

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2021

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                 to                

Commission file number 000-03683

Trustmark Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Mississippi

 

64-0471500

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

248 East Capitol Street, Jackson, Mississippi

 

39201

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(601) 208-5111

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, no par value

TRMK

Nasdaq Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

 

 

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

 

 

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

 

 

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes      No  

As of July 30, 2021, there were 62,454,967 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock (no par value).

 

 

 


 

 

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “hope,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “seek,” “continue,” “could,” “would,” “future” or the negative of those terms or other words of similar meaning.  You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our future expectations or state other “forward-looking” information.  These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to anticipated future operating and financial performance measures, including net interest margin, credit quality, business initiatives, growth opportunities and growth rates, among other things, and encompass any estimate, prediction, expectation, projection, opinion, anticipation, outlook or statement of belief included therein as well as the management assumptions underlying these forward-looking statements.  You should be aware that the occurrence of the events described under the caption “Risk Factors” in Trustmark’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  Should one or more of these risks materialize, or should any such underlying assumptions prove to be significantly different, actual results may vary significantly from those anticipated, estimated, projected or expected.  Furthermore, many of these risks and uncertainties are currently amplified by and may continue to be amplified by or may, in the future, be amplified by, the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and also by the effectiveness of varying governmental responses in ameliorating the impact of the pandemic on our customers and the economies where they operate.

Risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations of Management include, but are not limited to, changes in the level of nonperforming assets and charge-offs, an increase in unemployment levels and slowdowns in economic growth, our ability to manage the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our markets and our customers, as well as the effectiveness of actions of federal, state and local governments and agencies (including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB)) to mitigate its spread and economic impact, local, state and national economic and market conditions, conditions in the housing and real estate markets in the regions in which Trustmark operates and the extent and duration of the current volatility in the credit and financial markets, levels of and volatility in crude oil prices, changes in our ability to measure the fair value of assets in our portfolio, material changes in the level and/or volatility of market interest rates, the performance and demand for the products and services we offer, including the level and timing of withdrawals from our deposit accounts, the costs and effects of litigation and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigation, our ability to attract noninterest-bearing deposits and other low-cost funds, competition in loan and deposit pricing, as well as the entry of new competitors into our markets through de novo expansion and acquisitions, economic conditions, including the potential impact of issues related to the European financial system and monetary and other governmental actions designed to address credit, securities, and/or commodity markets, the enactment of legislation and changes in existing regulations or enforcement practices or the adoption of new regulations, changes in accounting standards and practices, including changes in the interpretation of existing standards, that affect our consolidated financial statements, changes in consumer spending, borrowings and savings habits, technological changes, changes in the financial performance or condition of our borrowers, changes in our ability to control expenses, greater than expected costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquisitions or new products and lines of business, cyber-attacks and other breaches which could affect our information system security, natural disasters, environmental disasters, pandemics or other health crises, acts of war or terrorism, and other risks described in our filings with the SEC.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.  Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of this information, whether as the result of new information, future events or developments or otherwise.

 

 

2


 

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

($ in thousands)

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

2,267,224

 

 

$

1,952,504

 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under reverse repurchase agreements

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

Securities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: $2,531,885 - 2021

   $1,959,773 - 2020; allowance for credit losses: $0)

 

 

2,548,739

 

 

 

1,991,815

 

Securities held to maturity, net of allowance for credit losses of $0

   (fair value: $452,288 - 2021; $563,115 - 2020)

 

 

433,012

 

 

 

538,072

 

Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans

 

 

166,119

 

 

 

610,134

 

Loans held for sale (LHFS)

 

 

332,132

 

 

 

446,951

 

Loans held for investment (LHFI)

 

 

10,152,869

 

 

 

9,824,524

 

Less allowance for credit losses (ACL), LHFI

 

 

104,032

 

 

 

117,306

 

Net LHFI

 

 

10,048,837

 

 

 

9,707,218

 

Premises and equipment, net

 

 

200,970

 

 

 

194,278

 

Mortgage servicing rights

 

 

80,764

 

 

 

66,464

 

Goodwill

 

 

384,237

 

 

 

385,270

 

Identifiable intangible assets, net

 

 

6,170

 

 

 

7,390

 

Other real estate, net

 

 

9,439

 

 

 

11,651

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

33,201

 

 

 

30,901

 

Other assets

 

 

587,288

 

 

 

609,142

 

Total Assets

 

$

17,098,132

 

 

$

16,551,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest-bearing

 

$

4,446,991

 

 

$

4,349,010

 

Interest-bearing

 

 

10,185,093

 

 

 

9,699,754

 

Total deposits

 

 

14,632,084

 

 

 

14,048,764

 

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

 

157,176

 

 

 

164,519

 

Other borrowings

 

 

117,223

 

 

 

168,252

 

Subordinated notes

 

 

122,932

 

 

 

122,921

 

Junior subordinated debt securities

 

 

61,856

 

 

 

61,856

 

ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures

 

 

33,733

 

 

 

38,572

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

34,959

 

 

 

32,290

 

Other liabilities

 

 

158,860

 

 

 

173,549

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

15,318,823

 

 

 

14,810,723

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, no par value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized:  250,000,000 shares

Issued and outstanding:  62,773,226 shares - 2021; 63,424,526 shares - 2020

 

 

13,079

 

 

 

13,215

 

Capital surplus

 

 

210,420

 

 

 

233,120

 

Retained earnings

 

 

1,566,451

 

 

 

1,495,833

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

(10,641

)

 

 

(1,051

)

Total Shareholders' Equity

 

 

1,779,309

 

 

 

1,741,117

 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

$

17,098,132

 

 

$

16,551,840

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3


 

 

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

($ in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and fees on LHFS & LHFI

 

$

90,772

 

 

$

96,359

 

 

$

181,333

 

 

$

202,704

 

Interest and fees on PPP loans

 

 

25,555

 

 

 

5,044

 

 

 

34,796

 

 

 

5,044

 

Interest on securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

 

8,991

 

 

 

12,762

 

 

 

17,929

 

 

 

25,710

 

Tax exempt

 

 

118

 

 

 

249

 

 

 

347

 

 

 

610

 

Other interest income

 

 

489

 

 

 

239

 

 

 

992

 

 

 

979

 

Total Interest Income

 

 

125,925

 

 

 

114,653

 

 

 

235,397

 

 

 

235,047

 

Interest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on deposits

 

 

4,630

 

 

 

8,730

 

 

 

9,853

 

 

 

23,687

 

Interest on federal funds purchased and securities sold under

   repurchase agreements

 

 

59

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

667

 

Other interest expense

 

 

1,813

 

 

 

881

 

 

 

3,670

 

 

 

1,741

 

Total Interest Expense

 

 

6,502

 

 

 

9,653

 

 

 

13,638

 

 

 

26,095

 

Net Interest Income

 

 

119,423

 

 

 

105,000

 

 

 

221,759

 

 

 

208,952

 

Provision for credit losses, LHFI (PCL)

 

 

(3,991

)

 

 

18,185

 

 

 

(14,492

)

 

 

38,766

 

PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures (1)

 

 

4,528

 

 

 

6,242

 

 

 

(4,839

)

 

 

13,025

 

Net Interest Income After PCL

 

 

118,886

 

 

 

80,573

 

 

 

241,090

 

 

 

157,161

 

Noninterest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

 

7,613

 

 

 

6,397

 

 

 

14,969

 

 

 

16,429

 

Bank card and other fees

 

 

8,301

 

 

 

7,717

 

 

 

17,773

 

 

 

13,072

 

Mortgage banking, net

 

 

17,333

 

 

 

33,745

 

 

 

38,137

 

 

 

61,228

 

Insurance commissions

 

 

12,217

 

 

 

11,868

 

 

 

24,662

 

 

 

23,418

 

Wealth management

 

 

8,946

 

 

 

7,571

 

 

 

17,362

 

 

 

16,108

 

Other, net

 

 

2,001

 

 

 

2,213

 

 

 

4,091

 

 

 

4,520

 

Total Noninterest Income

 

 

56,411

 

 

 

69,511

 

 

 

116,994

 

 

 

134,775

 

Noninterest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

 

70,115

 

 

 

66,107

 

 

 

141,277

 

 

 

135,255

 

Services and fees

 

 

21,769

 

 

 

20,567

 

 

 

44,253

 

 

 

40,497

 

Net occupancy - premises

 

 

6,578

 

 

 

6,587

 

 

 

13,373

 

 

 

12,873

 

Equipment expense

 

 

5,567

 

 

 

5,620

 

 

 

11,811

 

 

 

11,236

 

Other real estate expense, net

 

 

1,511

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

1,835

 

 

 

1,565

 

Other expense

 

 

13,139

 

 

 

13,265

 

 

 

27,678

 

 

 

28,018

 

Total Noninterest Expense

 

 

118,679

 

 

 

112,417

 

 

 

240,227

 

 

 

229,444

 

Income Before Income Taxes

 

 

56,618

 

 

 

37,667

 

 

 

117,857

 

 

 

62,492

 

Income taxes

 

 

8,637

 

 

 

5,517

 

 

 

17,914

 

 

 

8,124

 

Net Income

 

$

47,981

 

 

$

32,150

 

 

$

99,943

 

 

$

54,368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings Per Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.76

 

 

$

0.51

 

 

$

1.58

 

 

$

0.86

 

Diluted

 

$

0.76

 

 

$

0.51

 

 

$

1.57

 

 

$

0.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)    During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark reclassified its credit loss expense related to off-balance sheet credit exposures from noninterest expense to provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures. Prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

4


 

 

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Net income per consolidated statements of income

 

$

47,981

 

 

$

32,150

 

 

$

99,943

 

 

$

54,368

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities and

   transferred securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the

   period

 

 

4,959

 

 

 

1,986

 

 

 

(11,391

)

 

 

32,366

 

Change in net unrealized holding loss on securities

   transferred to held to maturity

 

 

552

 

 

 

583

 

 

 

1,085

 

 

 

1,229

 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustments for changes realized in net

   income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in prior service costs

 

 

21

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

56

 

Recognized net loss due to lump sum settlement

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

Change in net actuarial loss

 

 

333

 

 

 

240

 

 

 

674

 

 

 

484

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

5,865

 

 

 

2,867

 

 

 

(9,590

)

 

 

34,165

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

53,846

 

 

$

35,017

 

 

$

90,353

 

 

$

88,533

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

5


 

 

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

($ in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

 

Retained

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Amount

 

 

Surplus

 

 

Earnings

 

 

(Loss)

 

 

Total

 

Balance, January 1, 2021

 

 

63,424,526

 

 

$

13,215

 

 

$

233,120

 

 

$

1,495,833

 

 

$

(1,051

)

 

$

1,741,117

 

Net income per consolidated statements

   of income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,962

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,455

)

 

 

(15,455

)

Common stock dividends paid ($0.23 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,685

)

 

 

 

 

 

(14,685

)

Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term

   incentive plan

 

 

114,977

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

(1,254

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,230

)

Repurchase and retirement of common stock

 

 

(144,981

)

 

 

(30

)

 

 

(4,155

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,185

)

Compensation expense, long-term

   incentive plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,181

 

Balance, March 31, 2021

 

 

63,394,522

 

 

 

13,209

 

 

 

229,892

 

 

 

1,533,110

 

 

 

(16,506

)

 

 

1,759,705

 

Net income per consolidated statements

   of income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,981

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,981

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,865

 

 

 

5,865

 

Common stock dividends paid ($0.23 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,640

)

 

 

 

 

 

(14,640

)

Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term

   incentive plan

 

 

8,524

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

Repurchase and retirement of common stock

 

 

(629,820

)

 

 

(132

)

 

 

(20,673

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20,805

)

Compensation expense, long-term

   incentive plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,214

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,214

 

Balance, June 30, 2021

 

 

62,773,226

 

 

$

13,079

 

 

$

210,420

 

 

$

1,566,451

 

 

$

(10,641

)

 

$

1,779,309

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


6


 

 

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (continued)

($ in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

 

Retained

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Amount

 

 

Surplus

 

 

Earnings

 

 

(Loss)

 

 

Total

 

Balance, January 1, 2020

 

 

64,200,111

 

 

$

13,376

 

 

$

256,400

 

 

$

1,414,526

 

 

$

(23,600

)

 

$

1,660,702

 

FASB ASU 2016-13 adoption adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19,949

)

 

 

 

 

 

(19,949

)

Net income per consolidated statements

   of income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,218

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,218

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,298

 

 

 

31,298

 

Common stock dividends paid ($0.23 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,706

)

 

 

 

 

 

(14,706

)

Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term

   incentive plan

 

 

83,759

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

(1,037

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,020

)

Repurchase and retirement of common stock

 

 

(886,958

)

 

 

(184

)

 

 

(27,354

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(27,538

)

Compensation expense, long-term

   incentive plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,394

 

Balance, March 31, 2020

 

 

63,396,912

 

 

 

13,209

 

 

 

229,403

 

 

 

1,402,089

 

 

 

7,698

 

 

 

1,652,399

 

Net income per consolidated statements

   of income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,150

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,867

 

 

 

2,867

 

Common stock dividends paid ($0.23 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,687

)

 

 

 

 

 

(14,687

)

Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term

   incentive plan

 

 

25,527

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(64

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(59

)

Compensation expense, long-term

   incentive plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,274

 

Balance, June 30, 2020

 

 

63,422,439

 

 

$

13,214

 

 

$

230,613

 

 

$

1,419,552

 

 

$

10,565

 

 

$

1,673,944

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

7


 

 

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per consolidated statements of income

 

$

99,943

 

 

$

54,368

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit loss expense, net

 

 

(19,331

)

 

 

51,791

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

22,428

 

 

 

19,656

 

Net amortization of securities

 

 

10,780

 

 

 

4,666

 

Gains on sales of loans, net

 

 

(45,625

)

 

 

(30,361

)

Compensation expense, long-term incentive plan

 

 

3,395

 

 

 

2,668

 

Deferred income tax provision

 

 

12,500

 

 

 

(19,500

)

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale

 

 

1,334,752

 

 

 

1,133,259

 

Purchases and originations of loans held for sale

 

 

(1,220,055

)

 

 

(1,167,299

)

Originations of mortgage servicing rights

 

 

(15,201

)

 

 

(12,396

)

Earnings on bank-owned life insurance

 

 

(2,418

)

 

 

(2,544

)

Net change in other assets

 

 

23,623

 

 

 

(45,712

)

Net change in other liabilities

 

 

(9,802

)

 

 

(1,491

)

Other operating activities, net

 

 

(6,871

)

 

 

28,447

 

Net cash from operating activities

 

 

188,118

 

 

 

15,552

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of securities held to maturity

 

 

105,814

 

 

 

79,114

 

Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of securities available for sale

 

 

442,450

 

 

 

249,383

 

Purchases of securities available for sale

 

 

(1,024,649

)

 

 

(492,067

)

Net proceeds from bank-owned life insurance

 

 

1,791

 

 

 

592

 

Net change in federal funds sold and securities purchased

   under reverse repurchase agreements

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

Net change in member bank stock

 

 

(1,037

)

 

 

361

 

Net change in LHFI and PPP loans

 

 

(237,666

)

 

 

(1,193,397

)

Proceeds from sales of PPP loans

 

 

353,287

 

 

 

 

Purchases of premises and equipment

 

 

(13,920

)

 

 

(8,638

)

Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Proceeds from sales of other real estate

 

 

1,167

 

 

 

10,279

 

Purchases of software

 

 

(2,336

)

 

 

(3,179

)

Investments in tax credit and other partnerships

 

 

(13,396

)

 

 

(1,612

)

Purchase of insurance book of business

 

 

 

 

 

(3,097

)

Net cash used in business acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

(4,834

)

Net cash from investing activities

 

 

(388,445

)

 

 

(1,367,092

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in deposits

 

 

583,320

 

 

 

2,259,916

 

Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

 

(7,343

)

 

 

(185,765

)

Net change in short-term borrowings

 

 

(4,653

)

 

 

4,062

 

Payments on long-term FHLB advances

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(34

)

Payments under finance lease obligations

 

 

(712

)

 

 

(905

)

Common stock dividends

 

 

(29,325

)

 

 

(29,393

)

Repurchase and retirement of common stock

 

 

(24,990

)

 

 

(27,538

)

Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term incentive plan

 

 

(1,241

)

 

 

(1,079

)

Net cash from financing activities

 

 

515,047

 

 

 

2,019,264

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

314,720

 

 

 

667,724

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

1,952,504

 

 

 

358,916

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

2,267,224

 

 

$

1,026,640

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

8


 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1 – Business, Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark) is a bank holding company headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi.  Through its subsidiaries, Trustmark operates as a financial services organization providing banking and financial solutions to corporate institutions and individual customers through 180 offices at June 30, 2021 in Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas.  

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Trustmark and all other entities in which Trustmark has a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation.  

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, included in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (2020 Annual Report).

Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.  In the opinion of Management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for the fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements have been included.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these accounting principles requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and income and expense during the reporting periods and the related disclosures.  Although Management’s estimates contemplate current conditions and how they are expected to change in the future, it is reasonably possible that in 2021 actual conditions could vary from those anticipated, which could affect Trustmark’s financial condition and results of operations.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, a pandemic as a result of the global spread of the coronavirus illness.  The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect economic activity globally, nationally and locally.  In response to the pandemic, federal and state authorities in the United States introduced various measures to try to limit or slow the spread of the virus, including travel restrictions, nonessential business closures, stay-at-home orders, and strict social distancing.  The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown and rapidly evolving.  It has caused substantial disruption in international and U.S. economies, markets, and employment.  The COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have a significant adverse impact on certain industries Trustmark serves, including restaurants and food services, hotels, retail and energy.  

Because of the significant uncertainties related to the ultimate duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential effects on customers and prospects, and on the national and local economy as a whole, there can be no assurances as to how the crisis may ultimately affect Trustmark’s loan portfolio.  It is unknown how long the adverse conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic will last and what the complete financial effect will be to Trustmark.  It is reasonably possible that estimates made in the financial statements could be materially and adversely impacted in the near term as a result of these conditions, including expected credit losses on loans and off-balance sheet credit exposures.  See Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI for information regarding the impact of COVID-19 on Trustmark’s loan portfolio.

Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act), a stimulus package intended to provide relief to businesses and consumers in the United States struggling as a result of the pandemic, was signed into law. A provision in the CARES Act included an initial $349 billion fund for the creation of the PPP through the Small Business Administration (SBA) and Treasury Department.  The PPP is intended to provide loans to small businesses, sole proprietorships, independent contractors and self-employed individuals to pay their employees, rent, mortgage interest and utilities.  PPP loans are forgivable, in whole or in part, if the proceeds are used for payroll and other permitted purposes in accordance with the requirements of the PPP.  If not forgiven, in whole or in part, these loans carry a fixed rate of 1.00% per annum with payments deferred until the date the SBA remits the borrower’s loan forgiveness amount to the lender (or, if the borrower does not apply for loan forgiveness, ten

9


 

months after the end of the borrower’s loan forgiveness covered period).  Originally, the loans carried a term of two years under SBA rules implementing the CARES Act, but a June 5, 2020 amendment to the CARES Act provided for a five-year minimum loan term for loans made beginning as of such date, and permitted lenders and borrowers to mutually agree to amend existing two-year loans to have terms of five yearsThe loans are 100% guaranteed by the SBA.  Subsequent legislation, including as noted below, has allocated additional funding to the PPP. The SBA pays the originating bank a processing fee ranging from 1.0% to 5.0%, based on the size of the loan. From April to August 2020, Trustmark accepted PPP applications and originated loans to qualified small businesses and other borrowers under this program. The SBA stopped accepting applications for PPP loans on August 8, 2020. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, enacted on December 27, 2020, extended some of the relief provisions in certain respects of the CARES Act, appropriated additional funding to the PPP and permitted certain PPP borrowers to make “second draw” loans. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, enacted on March 11, 2021, expanded the eligibility criteria for both first and second draw PPP loans and revised the exclusions from payroll costs for purposes of loan forgiveness. The PPP Extension Act of 2021, enacted on March 30, 2021, extended the PPP through May 31, 2021.

 

In January 2021, Trustmark resumed submitting applications to the SBA on behalf of and originating loans to qualified small businesses and other borrowers under the CARES Act, as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. During the first six months of 2021, Trustmark originated 5,727 PPP loans totaling $354.5 million (net of $21.7 million of deferred fees and costs).  

 

On June 30, 2021, Trustmark announced the sale of substantially all PPP loans originated in 2021 by its wholly owned subsidiary, Trustmark National Bank (TNB), to The Loan Source, Inc. (Loan Source), a firm with significant expertise in PPP loans. As a result of this transaction, Loan Source will assume responsibility for the servicing and forgiveness process for the loans it has acquired from Trustmark. This transaction will allow Trustmark to focus on more traditional lending efforts and increase its ability to provide customers with financial services in an improving economic environment.

 

Trustmark accelerated the recognition of unamortized PPP loan origination fees, net of cost, of approximately $18.6 million, in the second quarter of 2021 due to the sale of approximately $354.2 million in PPP loans. This revenue is substantially the same as Trustmark would expect to recognize upon the maturity or forgiveness of the PPP loans being sold in this transaction, and thus this transaction serves to accelerate revenue anticipated in future periods into the second quarter.

 

At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had 843 PPP loans outstanding that totaled $166.1 million (net of $2.1 million of deferred fees and costs).  

 

Due to the amount and nature of the PPP loans, these loans are not included in the LHFI portfolio and are presented separately in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The PPP loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA; therefore, no ACL was estimated for these loans.

10


 

Note 2 – Securities Available for Sale and Held to Maturity

The following tables are a summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale and held to maturity at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Securities Available for Sale

 

 

Securities Held to Maturity

 

June 30, 2021

 

Amortized

Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Estimated

Fair

Value

 

 

Amortized

Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Estimated

Fair

Value

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

$

29,988

 

 

$

37

 

 

$

 

 

$

30,025

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

U.S. Government agency obligations

 

 

16,289

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

(387

)

 

 

16,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obligations of states and political

   subdivisions

 

 

5,167

 

 

 

640

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,807

 

 

 

12,994

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

13,106

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage pass-through

   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed by GNMA

 

 

47,365

 

 

 

1,091

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

48,445

 

 

 

6,249

 

 

 

289

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,538

 

Issued by FNMA and FHLMC

 

 

1,975,328

 

 

 

15,621

 

 

 

(7,166

)

 

 

1,983,783

 

 

 

53,406

 

 

 

1,773

 

 

 

 

 

 

55,179

 

Other residential mortgage-backed

   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA,

   FHLMC or GNMA

 

 

277,411

 

 

 

6,620

 

 

 

(43

)

 

 

283,988

 

 

 

291,477

 

 

 

15,470

 

 

 

(38

)

 

 

306,909

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA,

   FHLMC or GNMA

 

 

180,337

 

 

 

861

 

 

 

(530

)

 

 

180,668

 

 

 

68,886

 

 

 

1,670

 

 

 

 

 

 

70,556

 

Total

 

$

2,531,885

 

 

$

24,991

 

 

$

(8,137

)

 

$

2,548,739

 

 

$

433,012

 

 

$

19,319

 

 

$

(43

)

 

$

452,288

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agency obligations

 

$

18,378

 

 

$

144

 

 

$

(481

)

 

$

18,041

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Obligations of states and political

   subdivisions

 

 

5,198

 

 

 

637

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,835

 

 

 

26,584

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

26,839

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage pass-through

   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed by GNMA

 

 

55,193

 

 

 

1,672

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

56,862

 

 

 

7,598

 

 

 

382

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,980

 

Issued by FNMA and FHLMC

 

 

1,421,861

 

 

 

20,768

 

 

 

(1,308

)

 

 

1,441,321

 

 

 

67,944

 

 

 

2,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

70,341

 

Other residential mortgage-backed

   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA,

   FHLMC or GNMA

 

 

409,883

 

 

 

9,600

 

 

 

(46

)

 

 

419,437

 

 

 

360,361

 

 

 

19,678

 

 

 

(55

)

 

 

379,984

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA,

   FHLMC or GNMA

 

 

49,260

 

 

 

1,068

 

 

 

(9

)

 

 

50,319

 

 

 

75,585

 

 

 

2,386

 

 

 

 

 

 

77,971

 

Total

 

$

1,959,773

 

 

$

33,889

 

 

$

(1,847

)

 

$

1,991,815

 

 

$

538,072

 

 

$

25,101

 

 

$

(58

)

 

$

563,115

 

During 2013, Trustmark reclassified approximately $1.099 billion of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity.  The securities were transferred at fair value, which became the cost basis for the securities held to maturity.  At the date of transfer, the net unrealized holding loss on the available for sale securities totaled approximately $46.6 million ($28.8 million, net of tax).  The net unrealized holding loss is amortized over the remaining life of the securities as a yield adjustment in a manner consistent with the amortization or accretion of the original purchase premium or discount on the associated security.  There were no gains or losses recognized as a result of the transfer.  At June 30, 2021, the net unamortized, unrealized loss on the transferred securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying balance sheet totaled approximately $7.5 million ($5.6 million, net of tax) compared to approximately $8.9 million ($6.7 million, net of tax) at December 31, 2020.

11


 

ACL on Securities

Securities Available for Sale

Quarterly, Trustmark evaluates if any security has a fair value less than its amortized cost.  Once these securities are identified, in order to determine whether a decline in fair value resulted from a credit loss or other factors, Trustmark performs further analysis.  If Trustmark determines that a credit loss exists, the credit portion of the allowance is measured using a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis using the effective interest rate as of the security’s purchase date. The amount of credit loss Trustmark records will be limited to the amount by which the amortized cost exceeds the fair value.  The DCF analysis utilizes contractual maturities, as well as third-party credit ratings and cumulative default rates published annually by Moody’s Investor Service (Moody’s).

At both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the results of the analysis did not identify any securities that violate the credit loss triggers; therefore, no DCF analysis was performed and no credit loss was recognized on any of the securities available for sale.  

Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses for securities available for sale.  At June 30, 2021, accrued interest receivable totaled $4.2 million for securities available for sale compared to $4.0 million at December 31, 2020 and was reported in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Securities Held to Maturity

At June 30, 2021, the potential credit loss exposure was $13.0 million compared to $26.6 million at December 31, 2020 and consisted of municipal securities.  After applying appropriate probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) assumptions, the total amount of current expected credit losses was deemed immaterial.  Therefore, no reserve was recorded at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.  

Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses for securities held to maturity.  At June 30, 2021 and accrued interest receivable totaled $888 thousand for securities held to maturity compared to $1.2 million at December 31, 2020 and was reported in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

At both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Trustmark had no securities held to maturity that were past due 30 days or more as to principal or interest payments.  Trustmark had no securities held to maturity classified as nonaccrual at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.  

Trustmark monitors the credit quality of securities held to maturity on a monthly basis through credit ratings.  The following table presents the amortized cost of Trustmark’s securities held to maturity by credit rating, as determined by Moody’s, at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Aaa

 

$

420,018

 

 

$

511,488

 

Aa1 to Aa3

 

 

8,944

 

 

 

22,528

 

Not Rated (1)

 

 

4,050

 

 

 

4,056

 

Total

 

$

433,012

 

 

$

538,072

 

 

(1) Not rated securities primarily consist of Mississippi municipal general obligations.

 

 

12


 

 

The tables below include securities with gross unrealized losses for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded and segregated by length of impairment at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Less than 12 Months

 

 

12 Months or More

 

 

Total

 

June 30, 2021

 

Estimated

Fair Value

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Estimated

Fair Value

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Estimated

Fair Value

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

U.S. Government agency obligations

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

10,003

 

 

$

(387

)

 

$

10,003

 

 

$

(387

)

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

3,206

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

667

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

3,873

 

 

 

(5

)

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage pass-through securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed by GNMA

 

 

1,143

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,143

 

 

 

(11

)

Issued by FNMA and FHLMC

 

 

924,404

 

 

 

(7,166

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

924,404

 

 

 

(7,166

)

Other residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or

   GNMA

 

 

19,828

 

 

 

(81

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,828

 

 

 

(81

)

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or

   GNMA

 

 

89,050

 

 

 

(521

)

 

 

649

 

 

 

(9

)

 

 

89,699

 

 

 

(530

)

Total

 

$

1,037,631

 

 

$

(7,782

)

 

$

11,319

 

 

$

(398

)

 

$

1,048,950

 

 

$

(8,180

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agency obligations

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

11,167

 

 

$

(481

)

 

$

11,167

 

 

$

(481

)

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

667

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

667

 

 

 

(3

)

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage pass-through securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed by GNMA

 

 

1,636

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,636

 

 

 

(3

)

Issued by FNMA and FHLMC

 

 

324,905

 

 

 

(1,308

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

324,905

 

 

 

(1,308

)

Other residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or

   GNMA

 

 

29,398

 

 

 

(101

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,398

 

 

 

(101

)

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or

   GNMA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

659

 

 

 

(9

)

 

 

659

 

 

 

(9

)

Total

 

$

355,939

 

 

$

(1,412

)

 

$

12,493

 

 

$

(493

)

 

$

368,432

 

 

$

(1,905

)

The unrealized losses shown above are due to increases in market rates over the yields available at the time of purchase of the underlying securities and not credit quality.  Trustmark does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that Trustmark will not be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be at maturity.

Security Gains and Losses

During the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, there were no gross realized gains or losses as a result of calls and dispositions of securities.  Realized gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method and are included in noninterest income as security gains (losses), net.

Securities Pledged

Securities with a carrying value of $2.163 billion and $1.964 billion at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, were pledged to collateralize public deposits and securities sold under repurchase agreements and for other purposes as permitted by law.  At both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, none of these securities were pledged under the Federal Reserve Discount Window program to provide additional contingency funding capacity.  

13


 

Contractual Maturities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale and held to maturity at June 30, 2021, by contractual maturity, are shown below ($ in thousands).  Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

 

 

Securities

Available for Sale

 

 

Securities

Held to Maturity

 

 

 

Amortized

Cost

 

 

Estimated

Fair Value

 

 

Amortized

Cost

 

 

Estimated

Fair Value

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

1,354

 

 

$

1,376

 

 

$

7,660

 

 

$

7,687

 

Due after one year through five years

 

 

16,721

 

 

 

16,784

 

 

 

5,334

 

 

 

5,419

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

 

16,191

 

 

 

16,189

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due after ten years

 

 

17,178

 

 

 

17,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,444

 

 

 

51,855

 

 

 

12,994

 

 

 

13,106

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

2,480,441

 

 

 

2,496,884

 

 

 

420,018

 

 

 

439,182

 

Total

 

$

2,531,885

 

 

$

2,548,739

 

 

$

433,012

 

 

$

452,288

 

 

 

 

 

Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI

At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, LHFI consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

532,637

 

 

$

514,056

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

507,733

 

 

 

524,732

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

2,819,662

 

 

 

2,709,026

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

1,078,622

 

 

 

1,065,964

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

827,665

 

 

 

794,983

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1,302,663

 

 

 

1,216,400

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

1,326,605

 

 

 

1,309,078

 

Consumer loans

 

 

156,075

 

 

 

164,386

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

1,136,764

 

 

 

1,000,776

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

464,443

 

 

 

525,123

 

LHFI

 

 

10,152,869

 

 

 

9,824,524

 

Less ACL

 

 

104,032

 

 

 

117,306

 

Net LHFI

 

$

10,048,837

 

 

$

9,707,218

 

 

Accrued interest receivable is not included in the amortized cost basis of Trustmark’s LHFI.  At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, accrued interest receivable for LHFI totaled $29.7 million and $33.0 million, respectively, with no related ACL and was reported in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

Loan Concentrations

Trustmark does not have any loan concentrations other than those reflected in the preceding table, which exceed 10% of total LHFI.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark’s geographic loan distribution was concentrated primarily in its five key market regions: Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas.  Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of these loans is susceptible to changes in market conditions in these areas.

Nonaccrual and Past Due LHFI

No material interest income was recognized in the income statement on nonaccrual LHFI for each of the periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.

14


 

The following tables provide the amortized cost basis of loans on nonaccrual status and loans past due 90 days or more still accruing interest at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Nonaccrual With No ACL

 

 

Total Nonaccrual

 

 

Loans Past Due 90 Days or More Still Accruing

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

5,903

 

 

$

6,165

 

 

$

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1,376

 

 

 

3,731

 

 

 

52

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

11,532

 

 

 

13,563

 

 

 

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

57

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

 

12,222

 

 

 

255

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

3,078

 

 

 

6,042

 

 

 

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

116

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

 

3,854

 

 

 

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

77

 

 

 

5,643

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

22,023

 

 

$

51,448

 

 

$

423

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Nonaccrual With No ACL

 

 

Total Nonaccrual

 

 

Loans Past Due 90 Days or More Still Accruing

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

5,756

 

 

$

5,985

 

 

$

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1,895

 

 

 

4,487

 

 

 

79

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

12,037

 

 

 

15,197

 

 

 

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

60

 

 

 

185

 

 

 

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

 

11,807

 

 

 

1,257

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

12,665

 

 

 

15,618

 

 

 

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

240

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

 

3,970

 

 

 

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

 

 

 

5,793

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

32,413

 

 

$

63,128

 

 

$

1,576

 

The following tables provide an aging analysis of the amortized cost basis of past due LHFI at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Past Due

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30-59 Days

 

 

60-89 Days

 

 

90 Days

or More

 

 

Total Past Due

 

 

Current

Loans

 

 

Total LHFI

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

352

 

 

$

5,583

 

 

$

196

 

 

$

6,131

 

 

$

526,506

 

 

$

532,637

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1,160

 

 

 

538

 

 

 

803

 

 

 

2,501

 

 

 

505,232

 

 

 

507,733

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

422

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

693

 

 

 

1,138

 

 

 

2,818,524

 

 

 

2,819,662

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

170

 

 

 

1,078,452

 

 

 

1,078,622

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

827,665

 

 

 

827,665

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

2,230

 

 

 

1,061

 

 

 

5,816

 

 

 

9,107

 

 

 

1,293,556

 

 

 

1,302,663

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

291

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

3,797

 

 

 

4,153

 

 

 

1,322,452

 

 

 

1,326,605

 

Consumer loans

 

 

767

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

970

 

 

 

155,105

 

 

 

156,075

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

177

 

 

 

177

 

 

 

1,136,587

 

 

 

1,136,764

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

400

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

5,086

 

 

 

5,559

 

 

 

458,884

 

 

 

464,443

 

Total

 

$

5,685

 

 

$

7,430

 

 

$

16,791

 

 

$

29,906

 

 

$

10,122,963

 

 

$

10,152,869

 

15


 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Past Due

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30-59 Days

 

 

60-89 Days

 

 

90 Days

or More

 

 

Total Past Due

 

 

Current

Loans

 

 

Total LHFI

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

339

 

 

$

34

 

 

$

161

 

 

$

534

 

 

$

513,522

 

 

$

514,056

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1,505

 

 

 

523

 

 

 

896

 

 

 

2,924

 

 

 

521,808

 

 

 

524,732

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

920

 

 

 

 

 

 

972

 

 

 

1,892

 

 

 

2,707,134

 

 

 

2,709,026

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

103

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

311

 

 

 

1,065,653

 

 

 

1,065,964

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

794,983

 

 

 

794,983

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

3,291

 

 

 

1,289

 

 

 

5,110

 

 

 

9,690

 

 

 

1,206,710

 

 

 

1,216,400

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

271

 

 

 

196

 

 

 

1,543

 

 

 

2,010

 

 

 

1,307,068

 

 

 

1,309,078

 

Consumer loans

 

 

926

 

 

 

190

 

 

 

240

 

 

 

1,356

 

 

 

163,030

 

 

 

164,386

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

117

 

 

 

 

 

 

177

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

1,000,482

 

 

 

1,000,776

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

2,143

 

 

 

2,971

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

5,460

 

 

 

519,663

 

 

 

525,123

 

Total

 

$

9,615

 

 

$

5,304

 

 

$

9,552

 

 

$

24,471

 

 

$

9,800,053

 

 

$

9,824,524

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDR)

A TDR occurs when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, and for related economic or legal reasons, a concession is granted to the borrower that Trustmark would not otherwise consider.  Whatever the form of concession that might be granted by Trustmark, Management’s objective is to enhance collectability by obtaining more cash or other value from the borrower or by increasing the probability of receipt by granting the concession than by not granting it.  Other concessions may arise from court proceedings or may be imposed by law.  In addition, TDRs also include those credits that are extended or renewed to a borrower who is not able to obtain funds from sources other than Trustmark at a market interest rate for new debt with similar risk.

At June 30, 2021 and 2020, LHFI classified as TDRs totaled $25.1 million and $26.9 million, respectively.  At June 30, 2021, TDRs were primarily comprised of payment concessions, credits with interest-only payments for an extended period of time and credits renewed at a rate that was not commensurate with that of new debt with similar risk which totaled $16.4 million.  At June 30, 2020, TDRs were primarily comprised of credits with interest-only payments for an extended period of time and credits renewed at a rate that was not commensurate with that of new debt with similar risk which totaled $14.6 million.  The remaining TDRs at June 30, 2021 and 2020 resulted from bankruptcies or from payment or maturity extensions.  Trustmark had $2.0 million of unused commitments on TDRs at June 30, 2021 compared to $5.6 million at June 30, 2020.  

At June 30, 2021, TDRs had a related ACL of $3.9 million, compared to $2.0 million at June 30, 2020.  Trustmark had $3.7 million in charge-offs on TDRs for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020.

16


 

The following table illustrates the impact of modifications classified as TDRs for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Number of

Contracts

 

 

Pre-Modification

Outstanding

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Post-Modification

Outstanding

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Number of

Contracts

 

 

Pre-Modification

Outstanding

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Post-Modification

Outstanding

Recorded

Investment

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and

   other land

 

 

5

 

 

$

5,582

 

 

$

5,582

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other secured by 1-4 family

   residential properties

 

 

3

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

206

 

 

 

210

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties

 

 

1

 

 

 

377

 

 

 

377

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

139

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties

 

 

1

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

1

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

6

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3,902

 

 

 

3,872

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

2

 

 

 

4,929

 

 

 

4,929

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

13

 

 

$

12,048

 

 

$

12,048

 

 

 

8

 

 

$

4,253

 

 

$

4,227

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Number of

Contracts

 

 

Pre-Modification

Outstanding

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Post-Modification

Outstanding

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Number of

Contracts

 

 

Pre-Modification

Outstanding

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Post-Modification

Outstanding

Recorded

Investment

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and

   other land

 

 

5

 

 

 

5,582

 

 

 

5,582

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties

 

 

3

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

707

 

 

 

711

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties

 

 

1

 

 

 

377

 

 

 

377

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

139

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties

 

 

3

 

 

 

249

 

 

 

249

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

2

 

 

 

1,014

 

 

 

1,014

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1,582

 

 

 

1,582

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

26

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3,902

 

 

 

3,872

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

2

 

 

 

4,929

 

 

 

4,929

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

16

 

 

$

12,188

 

 

$

12,188

 

 

 

19

 

 

$

6,356

 

 

$

6,330

 

17


 

 

 

The table below includes the balances at default for TDRs modified within the last 12 months for which there was a payment default during the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Number of

Contracts

 

 

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Number of

Contracts

 

 

Recorded

Investment

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

3

 

 

$

420

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

139

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

82

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

2

 

 

 

4,929

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

3

 

 

$

5,007

 

 

 

5

 

 

$

641

 

 

Trustmark’s TDRs have resulted primarily from allowing the borrower to pay interest-only for an extended period of time and credits renewed at a rate that was not commensurate with that of new debt with similar risk rather than from forgiveness.  Accordingly, as shown above, these TDRs have a similar recorded investment for both the pre-modification and post-modification disclosure.  Trustmark has utilized loans 90 days or more past due to define payment default in determining TDRs that have subsequently defaulted.

The following tables detail LHFI classified as TDRs by loan class at June 30, 2021 and 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Accruing

 

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

Total

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

 

 

$

5,593

 

 

$

5,593

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

 

1,160

 

 

 

1,160

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

 

 

 

3,090

 

 

 

3,090

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

52

 

 

 

2,414

 

 

 

2,466

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

2,500

 

 

 

1,608

 

 

 

4,108

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

12

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

 

3,677

 

 

 

3,677

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

 

 

 

5,009

 

 

 

5,009

 

Total TDRs

 

$

2,552

 

 

$

22,563

 

 

$

25,115

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Accruing

 

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

Total

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

 

 

$

14

 

 

$

14

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

71

 

 

 

3,761

 

 

 

3,832

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

 

 

 

3,010

 

 

 

3,010

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

1,500

 

 

 

14,487

 

 

 

15,987

 

Consumer loans

 

 

18

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

39

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

 

3,872

 

 

 

3,872

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

125

 

Total TDRs

 

$

1,589

 

 

$

25,290

 

 

$

26,879

 

 

The CARES Act, as amended by subsequent legislation, specified that COVID-19 related modifications executed between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of either (i) 60 days after the date of termination of the national emergency declared by the President or (ii) January 1, 2022, on loans that were current as of December 31, 2019 were not TDRs.  Additionally, under guidance from the federal banking agencies, other short-term modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers that were current prior to any relief are not TDRs under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 310-40, “Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors.” These modifications include short-term (e.g., up to six months) modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or delays in payment that are insignificant.  

18


 

Borrowers considered current are those that are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a modification program is implemented.  Commercial concessions were primarily either interest only for 90 days or full payment deferrals for 90 days.  Consumer concessions were 90-day full payment deferrals.  At June 30, 2021, the balance of loans remaining under some type of COVID-19 related concession totaled $19.0 million compared to $34.2 million at December 31, 2020.

Collateral-Dependent Loans

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by class of loans and collateral type as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Real Estate

 

 

Equipment and

Machinery

 

 

Inventory and Receivables

 

 

Vehicles

 

 

Miscellaneous

 

 

Total

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and

   other land

 

$

5,903

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

5,903

 

Other secured by 1-4 family

   residential properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties

 

 

11,763

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,763

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

57

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties

 

 

1,376

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,376

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

43

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

4,285

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,474

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

3,854

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,854

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

365

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,031

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

3,051

 

 

 

5,451

 

Total

 

$

23,361

 

 

$

72

 

 

$

6,316

 

 

$

78

 

 

$

3,051

 

 

$

32,878

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Real Estate

 

 

Equipment and

Machinery

 

 

Inventory and Receivables

 

 

Vehicles

 

 

Miscellaneous

 

 

Total

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and

   other land

 

$

5,756

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

5,756

 

Other secured by 1-4 family

   residential properties

 

 

454

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

454

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties

 

 

12,037

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,037

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties

 

 

1,441

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,441

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

86

 

 

 

425

 

 

 

4,899

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

8,531

 

 

 

14,076

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

3,970

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,970

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

606

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,958

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,051

 

 

 

5,615

 

Total

 

$

24,410

 

 

$

425

 

 

$

6,857

 

 

$

135

 

 

$

11,582

 

 

$

43,409

 

A loan is collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral.  The following provides a qualitative description by class of loan of the collateral that secures Trustmark’s collateral-dependent LHFI:

 

Loans secured by real estate – Loans within these loan classes are secured by liens on real estate properties. There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

19


 

 

Other loans secured by real estate – Loans within these loan classes are secured by liens on real estate properties. There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

 

Commercial and industrial loans – Loans within this loan class are primarily secured by inventory, accounts receivables, equipment and other non-real estate collateral. During the second quarter of 2021, a relationship previously reserved for was charged down to fair value.  There have been no other significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

 

State and other political subdivision loans – Loans within this loan class are secured by liens on real estate properties. There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

 

Other commercial loans – Loans within this loan class are secured by liens on real estate properties or priority status of a Uniform Commercial Code agreement for non-real estate collateral. There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

Credit Quality Indicators

Trustmark’s LHFI portfolio credit quality indicators focus on six key quality ratios that are compared against bank tolerances.  The loan indicators are total classified outstanding, total criticized outstanding, nonperforming loans, nonperforming assets, delinquencies and net loan losses.  Due to the homogenous nature of consumer loans, Trustmark does not assign a formal internal risk rating to each credit and therefore the criticized and classified measures are primarily composed of commercial loans.

In addition to monitoring portfolio credit quality indicators, Trustmark also measures how effectively the lending process is being managed and risks are being identified.  As part of an ongoing monitoring process, Trustmark grades the commercial portfolio segment as it relates to credit file completion and financial statement exceptions, underwriting, collateral documentation and compliance with law as shown below:

 

Credit File Completeness and Financial Statement Exceptions – evaluates the quality and condition of credit files in terms of content and completeness and focuses on efforts to obtain and document sufficient information to determine the quality and status of credits.  Also included is an evaluation of the systems/procedures used to ensure compliance with policy.

 

Underwriting – evaluates whether credits are adequately analyzed, appropriately structured and properly approved within loan policy requirements.  A properly approved credit is approved by adequate authority in a timely manner with all conditions of approval fulfilled.  Total policy exceptions measure the level of underwriting and other policy exceptions within a portfolio segment.

 

Collateral Documentation – focuses on the adequacy of documentation to perfect Trustmark’s collateral position and substantiate collateral value.  Collateral exceptions measure the level of documentation exceptions within a portfolio segment.  Collateral exceptions occur when certain collateral documentation is either not present or not current.

 

Compliance with Law – focuses on underwriting, documentation, approval and reporting in compliance with banking laws and regulations.  Primary emphasis is directed to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Regulation O requirements and regulations governing appraisals.

Commercial Credits

Trustmark has established a loan grading system that consists of ten individual credit risk grades (risk ratings) that encompass a range from loans where the expectation of loss is negligible to loans where loss has been established.  The model is based on the risk of default for an individual credit and establishes certain criteria to delineate the level of risk across the ten unique credit risk grades.  Credit risk grade definitions are as follows:

 

Risk Rate (RR) 1 through RR 6 – Grades one through six represent groups of loans that are not subject to criticism as defined in regulatory guidance.  Loans in these groups exhibit characteristics that represent low to moderate risk measured by using a variety of credit risk criteria such as cash flow coverage, debt service coverage, balance sheet leverage, liquidity, management experience, industry position, prevailing economic conditions, support from secondary sources of repayment and other credit factors that may be relevant to a specific loan.  In general, these loans are supported by properly margined collateral and guarantees of principal parties.

 

Other Assets Especially Mentioned (Special Mention) (RR 7) – a loan that has a potential weakness that if not corrected will lead to a more severe rating.  This rating is for credits that are currently protected but potentially weak because of an adverse feature or condition that if not corrected will lead to a further downgrade.

20


 

 

Substandard (RR 8) – a loan that has at least one identified weakness that is well defined.  This rating is for credits where the primary sources of repayment are not viable at the time of evaluation or where either the capital or collateral is not adequate to support the loan and the secondary means of repayment do not provide a sufficient level of support to offset the identified weakness.  Loss potential exists in the aggregate amount of substandard loans but does not necessarily exist in individual loans.

 

Doubtful (RR 9) – a loan with an identified weakness that does not have a valid secondary source of repayment.  Generally, these credits have an impaired primary source of repayment and secondary sources are not sufficient to prevent a loss in the credit.  The exact amount of the loss has not been determined at this time.

 

Loss (RR 10) – a loan or a portion of a loan that is deemed to be uncollectible.

By definition, credit risk grades special mention (RR 7), substandard (RR 8), doubtful (RR 9) and loss (RR 10) are criticized loans while substandard (RR 8), doubtful (RR 9) and loss (RR 10) are classified loans.  These definitions are standardized by all bank regulatory agencies and are generally equally applied to each individual lending institution.  The remaining credit risk grades are considered pass credits and are solely defined by Trustmark.

To enhance this process, Trustmark has determined that loans will be individually assessed, and a formal analysis will be performed and based upon the analysis the loan will be written down to net realizable value.  Trustmark will individually assess and remove loans from the pool in the following circumstances:

 

Commercial nonaccrual loans with total exposure of $500 thousand (excluding those portions of the debt that are government guaranteed or are secured by Trustmark deposits or marketable securities) or more.  

 

Any loan that is believed to not share similar risk characteristics with the rest of the pool will be individually assessed.  Otherwise, the loan will be left within the pool based on the results of the assessment.

 

Commercial accruing loans deemed to be a TDR with total exposure of $500 thousand (excluding those portions of the debt that are government guaranteed or are secured by Trustmark deposits or marketable securities) or more.  If the loan is believed to not share similar risk characteristics with the rest of the loan pool, the loan will be individually assessed.  Otherwise, the loan will be left within the pool and monitored on an ongoing basis.

Each loan officer assesses the appropriateness of the internal risk rating assigned to their credits on an ongoing basis.  Trustmark’s Asset Review area conducts independent credit quality reviews of the majority of Trustmark’s commercial loan portfolio both on the underlying credit quality of each individual loan class as well as the adherence to Trustmark’s loan policy and the loan administration process.

In addition to the ongoing internal risk rate monitoring described above, Trustmark’s Credit Quality Review Committee meets monthly and performs a review of all loans of $100 thousand or more that are either delinquent 30 days or more or on nonaccrual.  This review includes recommendations regarding risk ratings, accrual status, charge-offs and appropriate servicing officer as well as evaluation of problem credits for determination of TDRs.  Quarterly, the Credit Quality Review Committee reviews and modifies continuous action plans for all credits risk rated seven or worse for relationships of $100 thousand or more.

 

In addition, periodic reviews of significant development, commercial construction, multi-family and nonowner-occupied projects are performed.  These reviews assess each particular project with respect to location, project valuations, progress of completion, leasing status, current financial information, rents, operating expenses, cash flow, adherence to budget and projections and other information as applicable.  Summary results are reviewed by Senior and Regional Credit Officers in addition to the Chief Credit Officer with a determination made as to the appropriateness of existing risk ratings and accrual status.

Consumer Credits

Consumer LHFI that do not meet a minimum custom credit score are reviewed quarterly by Management.  The Retail Credit Review Committee reviews the volume and percentage of approvals that did not meet the minimum passing custom score to ensure that Trustmark continues to originate quality loans. 

Trustmark monitors the levels and severity of past due consumer LHFI on a daily basis through its collection activities.  A detailed assessment of consumer LHFI delinquencies is performed monthly at both a product and market level by delivery channel, which incorporates the perceived level of risk at time of underwriting. 

21


 

The tables below present the amortized cost basis of loans by credit quality indicator and class of loans based on analyses performed at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

Term Loans by Origination Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Prior

 

 

Revolving Loans

 

 

Total

 

As of June 30, 2021

 

Commercial LHFI

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development

   and other land:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

188,112

 

 

$

163,334

 

 

$

36,863

 

 

$

15,430

 

 

$

1,880

 

 

$

5,231

 

 

$

33,860

 

 

$

444,710

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

2,538

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

3,461

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,182

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

Total

 

 

190,650

 

 

 

163,349

 

 

 

40,324

 

 

 

15,474

 

 

 

1,892

 

 

 

5,385

 

 

 

33,860

 

 

 

450,934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

20,192

 

 

$

28,659

 

 

$

15,975

 

 

$

12,834

 

 

$

7,585

 

 

$

8,108

 

 

$

7,366

 

 

$

100,719

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

143

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

371

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

649

 

 

 

432

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

676

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,102

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Total

 

 

20,984

 

 

 

29,297

 

 

 

15,982

 

 

 

13,062

 

 

 

7,742

 

 

 

8,784

 

 

 

7,366

 

 

 

103,217

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

281,444

 

 

$

635,065

 

 

$

590,473

 

 

$

445,938

 

 

$

241,109

 

 

$

404,951

 

 

$

79,715

 

 

$

2,678,695

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

10,324

 

 

 

9,729

 

 

 

1,445

 

 

 

1,683

 

 

 

1,640

 

 

 

4,874

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,695

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

14,553

 

 

 

2,787

 

 

 

24,746

 

 

 

4,211

 

 

 

3,747

 

 

 

59,278

 

 

 

1,508

 

 

 

110,830

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

206

 

 

 

 

 

 

404

 

Total

 

 

306,369

 

 

 

647,581

 

 

 

616,814

 

 

 

451,832

 

 

 

246,496

 

 

 

469,309

 

 

 

81,223

 

 

 

2,819,624

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other real estate secured:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

139,687

 

 

$

90,717

 

 

$

451,580

 

 

$

256,369

 

 

$

33,260

 

 

$

79,188

 

 

$

12,611

 

 

$

1,063,412

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

808

 

 

 

 

 

 

808

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

3,836

 

 

 

9,999

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

179

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,026

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

143,523

 

 

 

100,716

 

 

 

451,580

 

 

 

256,381

 

 

 

33,260

 

 

 

80,175

 

 

 

12,611

 

 

 

1,078,246

 

 

22


 

 

 

 

Term Loans by Origination Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Prior

 

 

Revolving Loans

 

 

Total

 

As of June 30, 2021

 

Commercial LHFI

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

178,219

 

 

$

389,105

 

 

$

231,297

 

 

$

19,166

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

8,505

 

 

$

826,292

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

1,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,373

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

179,592

 

 

 

389,105

 

 

 

231,297

 

 

 

19,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,505

 

 

 

827,665

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

277,330

 

 

$

304,664

 

 

$

140,848

 

 

$

43,836

 

 

$

57,941

 

 

$

77,328

 

 

$

367,148

 

 

$

1,269,095

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

385

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

715

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

 

 

678

 

 

 

3,119

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

6,640

 

 

 

6,032

 

 

 

1,799

 

 

 

1,472

 

 

 

3,589

 

 

 

3,251

 

 

 

31,294

 

 

 

54,077

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

1

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

314

 

Total

 

 

285,003

 

 

 

311,215

 

 

 

142,902

 

 

 

46,134

 

 

 

61,627

 

 

 

80,604

 

 

 

399,120

 

 

 

1,326,605

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and other political subdivision

   loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

232,696

 

 

$

193,403

 

 

$

92,035

 

 

$

36,643

 

 

$

100,328

 

 

$

466,386

 

 

$

8,069

 

 

$

1,129,560

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,350

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,854

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,854

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

232,696

 

 

 

193,403

 

 

 

92,035

 

 

 

36,643

 

 

 

100,328

 

 

 

473,590

 

 

 

8,069

 

 

 

1,136,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other commercial loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

53,866

 

 

$

53,529

 

 

$

69,767

 

 

$

15,147

 

 

$

8,607

 

 

$

62,018

 

 

$

176,553

 

 

$

439,487

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

 

 

 

7,235

 

 

 

2,113

 

 

 

415

 

 

 

 

 

 

316

 

 

 

14,804

 

 

 

24,883

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

73

 

Total

 

 

53,866

 

 

 

60,814

 

 

 

71,880

 

 

 

15,562

 

 

 

8,607

 

 

 

62,357

 

 

 

191,357

 

 

 

464,443

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total commercial LHFI

 

$

1,412,683

 

 

$

1,895,480

 

 

$

1,662,814

 

 

$

854,254

 

 

$

459,952

 

 

$

1,180,204

 

 

$

742,111

 

 

$

8,207,498

 

 

 

23


 

 

 

 

Term Loans by Origination Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Prior

 

 

Revolving Loans

 

 

Total

 

As of June 30, 2021

 

Consumer LHFI

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and

   other land:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

17,103

 

 

$

43,274

 

 

$

11,951

 

 

$

4,272

 

 

$

1,092

 

 

$

3,183

 

 

$

451

 

 

$

81,326

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

162

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

246

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

Total

 

 

17,103

 

 

 

43,274

 

 

 

12,113

 

 

 

4,291

 

 

 

1,092

 

 

 

3,379

 

 

 

451

 

 

 

81,703

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

16,240

 

 

$

13,834

 

 

$

7,724

 

 

$

7,426

 

 

$

3,730

 

 

$

10,239

 

 

$

341,240

 

 

$

400,433

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

790

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

53

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

14

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

412

 

 

 

371

 

 

 

2,356

 

 

 

3,240

 

Total

 

 

16,254

 

 

 

13,937

 

 

 

7,883

 

 

 

7,437

 

 

 

4,142

 

 

 

10,698

 

 

 

344,165

 

 

 

404,516

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

35

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

38

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other real estate secured:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

 

 

$

102

 

 

$

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

34

 

 

$

231

 

 

$

 

 

$

376

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

231

 

 

 

 

 

 

376

 

 


24


 

 

 

 

Term Loans by Origination Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Prior

 

 

Revolving Loans

 

 

Total

 

As of June 30, 2021

 

Consumer LHFI

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

308,154

 

 

$

258,410

 

 

$

167,332

 

 

$

133,808

 

 

$

73,300

 

 

$

346,774

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,287,778

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

 

 

 

701

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

1,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,411

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

255

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

1,203

 

 

 

896

 

 

 

2,110

 

 

 

861

 

 

 

7,149

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,219

 

Total

 

 

308,154

 

 

 

260,567

 

 

 

168,414

 

 

 

136,092

 

 

 

74,282

 

 

 

355,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,302,663

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

37,466

 

 

$

40,869

 

 

$

15,320

 

 

$

8,082

 

 

$

2,317

 

 

$

907

 

 

$

50,097

 

 

$

155,058

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

327

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

279

 

 

 

848

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

116

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

53

 

Total

 

 

37,813

 

 

 

41,037

 

 

 

15,387

 

 

 

8,127

 

 

 

2,328

 

 

 

909

 

 

 

50,474

 

 

 

156,075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total consumer LHFI

 

$

379,359

 

 

$

358,917

 

 

$

203,797

 

 

$

155,956

 

 

$

81,881

 

 

$

370,371

 

 

$

395,090

 

 

$

1,945,371

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total LHFI

 

$

1,792,042

 

 

$

2,254,397

 

 

$

1,866,611

 

 

$

1,010,210

 

 

$

541,833

 

 

$

1,550,575

 

 

$

1,137,201

 

 

$

10,152,869

 

 

25


 

 

 

 

Term Loans by Origination Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Prior

 

 

Revolving Loans

 

 

Total

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

Commercial LHFI

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development

   and other land:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

287,218

 

 

$

62,078

 

 

$

26,401

 

 

$

4,487

 

 

$

3,274

 

 

$

3,564

 

 

$

28,548

 

 

$

415,570

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

5,419

 

 

 

4,363

 

 

 

1,226

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

494

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

11,637

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

Total

 

 

292,637

 

 

 

66,441

 

 

 

27,627

 

 

 

4,499

 

 

 

3,768

 

 

 

3,628

 

 

 

28,649

 

 

 

427,249

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

35,139

 

 

$

19,596

 

 

$

15,399

 

 

$

9,605

 

 

$

10,273

 

 

$

4,786

 

 

$

8,486

 

 

$

103,284

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

255

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

305

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

1,155

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

914

 

 

 

341

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

337

 

 

 

3,950

 

 

 

7,007

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

Total

 

 

36,578

 

 

 

19,604

 

 

 

16,363

 

 

 

9,946

 

 

 

10,575

 

 

 

5,123

 

 

 

12,436

 

 

 

110,625

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

697,439

 

 

$

496,476

 

 

$

442,264

 

 

$

293,072

 

 

$

254,747

 

 

$

251,219

 

 

$

96,098

 

 

$

2,531,315

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

13,452

 

 

 

6,139

 

 

 

2,956

 

 

 

4,466

 

 

 

4,957

 

 

 

20,545

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,515

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

19,119

 

 

 

20,572

 

 

 

4,516

 

 

 

12,956

 

 

 

38,956

 

 

 

25,438

 

 

 

2,779

 

 

 

124,336

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

52

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

217

 

 

 

306

 

 

 

 

 

 

738

 

Total

 

 

730,062

 

 

 

523,350

 

 

 

449,736

 

 

 

310,494

 

 

 

298,877

 

 

 

297,508

 

 

 

98,877

 

 

 

2,708,904

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other real estate secured:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

146,803

 

 

$

376,765

 

 

$

347,472

 

 

$

48,626

 

 

$

89,824

 

 

$

23,680

 

 

$

12,116

 

 

$

1,045,286

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

841

 

 

 

 

 

 

841

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

18,649

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

556

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,359

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

165,452

 

 

 

376,779

 

 

 

347,490

 

 

 

48,626

 

 

 

90,380

 

 

 

24,643

 

 

 

12,116

 

 

 

1,065,486

 

26


 

 

 

 

Term Loans by Origination Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Prior

 

 

Revolving Loans

 

 

Total

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

Commercial LHFI

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

262,544

 

 

$

425,936

 

 

$

81,476

 

 

$

14,074

 

 

$

2,464

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,735

 

 

$

794,229

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

754

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

754

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

263,298

 

 

 

425,936

 

 

 

81,476

 

 

 

14,074

 

 

 

2,464

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,735

 

 

 

794,983

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

444,304

 

 

$

165,163

 

 

$

77,611

 

 

$

77,985

 

 

$

59,131

 

 

$

43,214

 

 

$

372,486

 

 

$

1,239,894

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

677

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

240

 

 

 

962

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

12,090

 

 

 

1,814

 

 

 

9,737

 

 

 

3,735

 

 

 

2,160

 

 

 

5,024

 

 

 

33,380

 

 

 

67,940

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

151

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

282

 

Total

 

 

457,222

 

 

 

167,117

 

 

 

87,348

 

 

 

81,720

 

 

 

61,323

 

 

 

48,242

 

 

 

406,106

 

 

 

1,309,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and other political subdivision loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

250,363

 

 

$

79,595

 

 

$

41,334

 

 

$

113,817

 

 

$

132,634

 

 

$

372,831

 

 

$

1,446

 

 

$

992,020

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,018

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,491

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,738

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

250,363

 

 

 

79,595

 

 

 

41,334

 

 

 

114,064

 

 

 

132,634

 

 

 

381,340

 

 

 

1,446

 

 

 

1,000,776

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other commercial loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass - RR 1 through RR 6

 

$

101,230

 

 

$

70,990

 

 

$

20,769

 

 

$

9,723

 

 

$

33,481

 

 

$

30,715

 

 

$

225,533

 

 

$

492,441

 

Special Mention - RR 7

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,333

 

 

 

18,833

 

Substandard - RR 8

 

 

381

 

 

 

2,099

 

 

 

683

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

707

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,948

 

 

 

13,824

 

Doubtful - RR 9

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Total

 

 

109,113

 

 

 

73,089

 

 

 

21,452

 

 

 

9,729

 

 

 

34,188

 

 

 

30,738

 

 

 

246,814

 

 

 

525,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total commercial LHFI

 

$

2,304,725

 

 

$

1,731,911

 

 

$

1,072,826

 

 

$

593,152

 

 

$

634,209

 

 

$

791,222

 

 

$

814,179

 

 

$

7,942,224

 

27


 

 

 

 

 

Term Loans by Origination Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Prior

 

 

Revolving Loans

 

 

Total

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

Consumer LHFI

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and

   other land:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

47,336

 

 

$

24,174

 

 

$

8,496

 

 

$

2,036

 

 

$

1,447

 

 

$

2,868

 

 

$

 

 

$

86,357

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

 

 

 

318

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

351

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

 

 

 

99

 

Total

 

 

47,336

 

 

 

24,492

 

 

 

8,516

 

 

 

2,036

 

 

 

1,448

 

 

 

2,979

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,807

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

20,864

 

 

$

10,253

 

 

$

12,037

 

 

$

4,177

 

 

$

2,082

 

 

$

11,124

 

 

$

348,830

 

 

$

409,367

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

93

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

133

 

 

 

1,058

 

 

 

1,309

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

52

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

6

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

428

 

 

 

 

 

 

382

 

 

 

2,398

 

 

 

3,379

 

Total

 

 

20,963

 

 

 

10,309

 

 

 

12,158

 

 

 

4,618

 

 

 

2,082

 

 

 

11,669

 

 

 

352,308

 

 

 

414,107

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

109

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

 

 

$

122

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other real estate secured:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

107

 

 

$

 

 

$

38

 

 

$

37

 

 

$

96

 

 

$

200

 

 

$

 

 

$

478

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

107

 

 

 

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

478

 

28


 

 

 

 

 

Term Loans by Origination Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Prior

 

 

Revolving Loans

 

 

Total

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

Consumer LHFI

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential

   properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

289,521

 

 

$

214,056

 

 

$

173,324

 

 

$

92,564

 

 

$

109,031

 

 

$

321,250

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,199,746

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

499

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

753

 

 

 

366

 

 

 

1,080

 

 

 

799

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,590

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

159

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

 

 

 

549

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,257

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

283

 

 

 

711

 

 

 

2,024

 

 

 

682

 

 

 

239

 

 

 

7,868

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,807

 

Total

 

 

290,462

 

 

 

215,074

 

 

 

176,309

 

 

 

93,739

 

 

 

110,350

 

 

 

330,466

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,216,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

65,370

 

 

$

25,303

 

 

$

13,140

 

 

$

3,893

 

 

$

1,257

 

 

$

345

 

 

$

53,669

 

 

$

162,977

 

Past due 30-89 days

 

 

524

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

305

 

 

 

1,083

 

Past due 90 days or more

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

240

 

Nonaccrual

 

 

12

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

Total

 

 

65,983

 

 

 

25,465

 

 

 

13,266

 

 

 

3,925

 

 

 

1,266

 

 

 

348

 

 

 

54,133

 

 

 

164,386

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total consumer LHFI

 

$

424,960

 

 

$

275,340

 

 

$

210,287

 

 

$

104,359

 

 

$

115,242

 

 

$

345,671

 

 

$

406,441

 

 

$

1,882,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total LHFI

 

$

2,729,685

 

 

$

2,007,251

 

 

$

1,283,113

 

 

$

697,511

 

 

$

749,451

 

 

$

1,136,893

 

 

$

1,220,620

 

 

$

9,824,524

 

Past Due LHFS

LHFS past due 90 days or more totaled $81.5 million and $119.4 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.  LHFS past due 90 days or more are serviced loans eligible for repurchase, which are fully guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA).  GNMA optional repurchase programs allow financial institutions to buy back individual delinquent mortgage loans that meet certain criteria from the securitized loan pool for which the institution provides servicing.  At the servicer’s option and without GNMA’s prior authorization, the servicer may repurchase such a delinquent loan for an amount equal to 100% of the remaining principal balance of the loan.  This buy-back option is considered a conditional option until the delinquency criteria are met, at which time the option becomes unconditional.  When Trustmark is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans under the unconditional buy-back option, the loans can no longer be reported as sold and must be brought back onto the balance sheet as loans held for sale, regardless of whether Trustmark intends to exercise the buy-back option.  These loans are reported as held for sale with the offsetting liability being reported as short-term borrowings.

Trustmark did not exercise its buy-back option on any delinquent loans serviced for GNMA during the first six months of 2021 or 2020.

ACL on LHFI

Trustmark’s ACL methodology for LHFI is based upon guidance within the FASB ASC Subtopic 326-20 as well as applicable regulatory guidance.  The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans.  Credit quality within the LHFI portfolio is continuously monitored by Management and is reflected within the ACL for loans.  The ACL is an estimate of expected losses inherent within Trustmark’s existing LHFI portfolio.  The ACL for LHFI is adjusted through the PCL and reduced by the charge off of loan amounts, net of recoveries.  

The methodology for estimating the amount of expected credit losses reported in the ACL has two basic components: a collective, or pooled, component for estimated expected credit losses for pools of loans that share similar risk characteristics, and an asset-specific component involving individual loans that do not share risk characteristics with other loans and the measurement of expected credit losses for such individual loans.  In estimating the allowance for credit losses for the collective component, loans are segregated into loan pools based on loan product types and similar risk characteristics.

29


 

The loans secured by real estate and other loans secured by real estate portfolio segments include loans for both commercial and residential properties.  The underwriting process for these loans includes analysis of the financial position and strength of both the borrower and guarantor, experience with similar projects in the past, market demand and prospects for successful completion of the proposed project within the established budget and schedule, values of underlying collateral, availability of permanent financing, maximum loan-to-value ratios, minimum equity requirements, acceptable amortization periods and minimum debt service coverage requirements, based on property type.  The borrower’s financial strength and capacity to repay their obligations remain the primary focus of underwriting.  Financial strength is evaluated based upon analytical tools that consider historical and projected cash flows and performance in addition to analysis of the proposed project for income-producing properties.  Additional support offered by guarantors is also considered.  Ultimate repayment of these loans is sensitive to interest rate changes, general economic conditions, liquidity and availability of long-term financing.

The commercial and industrial LHFI portfolio segment includes loans within Trustmark’s geographic markets made to many types of businesses for various purposes, such as short term working capital loans that are usually secured by accounts receivable and inventory and term financing for equipment and fixed asset purchases that are secured by those assets.  Trustmark’s credit underwriting process for commercial and industrial loans includes analysis of historical and projected cash flows and performance, evaluation of financial strength of both borrowers and guarantors as reflected in current and detailed financial information and evaluation of underlying collateral to support the credit.

The consumer LHFI portfolio segment is comprised of loans which are underwritten after evaluating a borrower’s repayment capacity, credit and collateral.  Several factors are considered when assessing a borrower’s capacity to repay the obligation, including the borrower’s employment, income, current debt and assets.  Credit is assessed using a credit report that provides credit scores and the borrower’s current and past information about their credit history.  Property appraisals are obtained to assist in evaluating collateral.  Loan-to-value and debt-to-income ratios, loan amount and lien position are also considered in assessing whether to originate a loan.  These borrowers are particularly susceptible to downturns in economic trends such as conditions that negatively affect housing prices and demand and levels of unemployment.

The state and other political subdivision LHFI and the other commercial LHFI portfolio segments primarily consist of loans to non-depository financial institutions, such as mortgage companies, finance companies and other financial intermediaries, loans to state and political subdivisions, and loans to non-profit and charitable organizations.  These loans are underwritten based on the specific nature or purpose of the loan and underlying collateral with special consideration given to the specific source of repayment for the loan.

30


 

The following table provides a description of each of Trustmark’s portfolio segments, loan classes, loan pools and the ACL methodology and loss drivers:

 

Portfolio Segment

 

Loan Class

 

Loan Pool

 

Methodology

 

Loss Drivers

Loans secured by real estate

 

Construction, land

   development and other land

 

1-4 family residential

   construction

 

DCF

 

Prime Rate, National GDP

 

 

 

 

Lots and development

 

DCF

 

Prime Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Unimproved land

 

DCF

 

Prime Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

All other consumer

 

DCF

 

Southern Unemployment

 

 

Other secured by 1-4

   family residential

   properties

 

Consumer 1-4 family - 1st liens

 

DCF

 

Prime Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

All other consumer

 

DCF

 

Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Nonresidential owner-occupied

 

DCF

 

Southern Unemployment, National GDP

 

 

Secured by nonfarm,

   nonresidential properties

 

Nonowner-occupied -

   hotel/motel

 

DCF

 

Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Nonowner-occupied - office

 

DCF

 

Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Nonowner-occupied- Retail

 

DCF

 

Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Nonowner-occupied - senior

   living/nursing homes

 

DCF

 

Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Nonowner-occupied -

   all other

 

DCF

 

Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Nonresidential owner-occupied

 

DCF

 

Southern Unemployment, National GDP

 

 

Other real estate secured

 

Nonresidential nonowner

   -occupied - apartments

 

DCF

 

Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Nonresidential owner-occupied

 

DCF

 

Southern Unemployment, National GDP

 

 

 

 

Nonowner-occupied -

   all other

 

DCF

 

Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment

Other loans secured by

   real estate

 

Other construction

 

Other construction

 

WARM

 

Prime Rate, National Unemployment

 

 

Secured by 1-4 family

   residential properties

 

Trustmark mortgage

 

WARM

 

Southern Unemployment

Commercial and

   industrial loans

 

Commercial and

   industrial loans

 

Commercial and industrial -

   non-working capital

 

DCF

 

Trustmark historical data

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial -

   working capital

 

DCF

 

Trustmark historical data

 

 

 

 

Credit cards

 

WARM

 

Trustmark call report data

Consumer loans

 

Consumer loans

 

Credit cards

 

WARM

 

Trustmark call report data

 

 

 

 

Overdrafts

 

Loss Rate

 

Trustmark historical data

 

 

 

 

All other consumer

 

DCF

 

Southern Unemployment

State and other political

   subdivision loans

 

State and other political

   subdivision loans

 

Obligations of state and

   political subdivisions

 

DCF

 

Moody's Bond Default Study

Other commercial loans

 

Other commercial loans

 

Other loans

 

DCF

 

Prime Rate, Southern Unemployment

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial -

   non-working capital

 

DCF

 

Trustmark historical data

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial -

   working capital

 

DCF

 

Trustmark historical data

In general, Trustmark utilizes a DCF method to estimate the quantitative portion of the allowance for credit losses for loan pools.  The DCF model consists of two key components, a loss driver analysis (LDA) and a cash flow analysis.  For loan pools utilizing the DCF methodology, multiple assumptions are in place, depending on the loan pool.  A reasonable and supportable forecast is utilized for each loan pool by developing a LDA for each loan class.  The LDA uses charge off data from Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) reports to construct a periodic default rate (PDR).  The PDR is decomposed into a PD.  Regressions are run using the data for various macroeconomic variables in order to determine which ones correlate to Trustmark’s losses.  These

31


 

variables are then incorporated into the application to calculate a quarterly PD using a third-party baseline forecast.  In addition to the PD, a LGD is derived using a method referred to as Frye Jacobs.  The Frye Jacobs method is a mathematical formula that traces the relationship between LGD and PD over time and projects the LGD based on the levels of PD forecasts. This model approach is applicable to all pools within the construction, land development and other land, other secured by 1-4 family residential properties, secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties and other real estate secured loan classes as well as the all other consumer and other loans pools.

For the commercial and industrial loans related pools, Trustmark uses its own PD and LGD data, instead of the macroeconomic variables and the Frye Jacobs method described above, to calculate the PD and LGD as there were no defensible macroeconomic variables that correlated to Trustmark’s losses.  Trustmark utilizes a third-party Bond Default Study to derive the PD and LGD for the obligations of state and political subdivisions pool.  Due to the lack of losses within this pool, no defensible macroeconomic factors were identified to correlate.

The PD and LGD measures are used in conjunction with prepayment data as inputs into the DCF model to calculate the cash flows at the individual loan level.  Contractual cash flows based on loan terms are adjusted for PD, LGD and prepayments to derive loss cash flows.  These loss cash flows are discounted by the loan’s coupon rate to arrive at the discounted cash flow based quantitative loss.  The prepayment studies are updated quarterly by a third-party for each applicable pool.

An alternate method of estimating the ACL is used for certain loan pools due to specific characteristics of these loans.  For the non-DCF pools, specifically, those using the weighted average remaining maturity (WARM) method, the remaining life is incorporated into the ACL quantitative calculation.

Trustmark determined that reasonable and supportable forecasts could be made for a twelve-month period for all of its loan pools.  To the extent the lives of the loans in the LHFI portfolio extend beyond this forecast period, Trustmark uses a reversion period of four quarters and reverts to the historical mean on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the loans.  The econometric models currently in production reflect segment or pool level sensitivities of PD to changes in macroeconomic variables. By measuring the relationship between defaults and changes in the economy, the quantitative reserve incorporates reasonable and supportable forecasts of future conditions that will affect the value of its assets, as required by FASB ASC Topic 326. Under stable forecasts, these linear regressions will reasonably predict a pool’s PD.  However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the macroeconomic variables used for reasonable and supportable forecasting have changed rapidly.  At the current levels, it is not clear that the models currently in production will produce reasonably representative results since the models were originally estimated using data beginning in 2004 through 2019.  During this period, a traditional, albeit severe, economic recession occurred.  Thus, econometric models are sensitive to similar future levels of PD.  

In order to prevent the econometric models from extrapolating beyond reasonable boundaries of their input variables, Trustmark chose to establish an upper and lower limit process when applying the periodic forecasts. In this way, Management will not rely upon unobserved and untested relationships in the setting of the quantitative reserve. This approach applies to all input variables, including: Southern Unemployment, National Unemployment, National GDP, Southern Vacancy Rate and the Prime Rate.  The upper and lower limits are based on the distribution of the macroeconomic variable by selecting extreme percentiles at the upper and lower limits of the distribution, the 1st and 99th percentiles, respectively.  These upper and lower limits are then used to calculate the PD for the forecast time period in which the forecasted values are outside of the upper and lower limit range.  For the second quarter of 2021, the forecast related to the macroeconomic variables used in the quantitative modeling process were positively impacted due to the updated forecast effects. However, due to multiple periods in the second quarter of 2021 having a PD or LGD at or near zero as a result of the improving macroeconomic forecasts, Management implemented PD and LGD floors to account for the risk associated with each portfolio.  The PD and LGD floors are based on Trustmark’s historical loss experience and applied at a portfolio level.    

Qualitative factors used in the ACL methodology include the following:

 

Lending policies and procedures

 

Economic conditions and concentrations of credit

 

Nature and volume of the portfolio

 

Performance trends

 

External factors

While all these factors are incorporated into the overall methodology, only three are currently considered active: (i) economic conditions and concentrations of credit, (ii) performance trends and (iii) external factors.

Two of Trustmark’s largest loan classes are the loans secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties and the loans secured by other real estate.  Trustmark elected to create a qualitative factor specifically for these loan classes which addresses changes in the economic

32


 

conditions of metropolitan areas and applies additional pool level reserves.  This qualitative factor is based on third-party market data and forecast trends and is updated quarterly as information is available, by market and by loan pool.

For the performance trends factor, Trustmark uses migration analyses to allocate additional ACL to non-pass/delinquent loans within each pool.  In this way, Management believes the ACL will directly reflect changes in risk, based on the performance of the loans within a pool, whether declining or improving.

The external factors qualitative factor is Management’s best judgement on the loan or pool level impact of all factors that affect the portfolio that are not accounted for using any other part of the ACL methodology (e.g., natural disasters, changes in legislation, impacts due to technology and pandemics).  During the third quarter of 2020, Trustmark activated the External Factor – Pandemic to ensure reserve adequacy for collectively evaluated loans most likely to be impacted by the unique economic and behavioral conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional qualitative reserves are derived based on two principles. The first is the disconnect of economic factors to Trustmark’s modeled probability of default (derived from the econometric models underpinning the quantitative pooled reserves). During the pandemic, extraordinary measures by the federal government were made available to consumers and businesses, including COVID-19 loan payment concessions, direct transfer payments to households, tax deferrals, and reduced interest rates, among others. These government interventions may have extended the lag between economic conditions and default, relative to what was captured in the model development data. Because Trustmark’s econometric PD models rely on the observed relationship from the economic downturn from 2007 to 2009 in both timing and severity, Management does not expect the models to reflect these current conditions. For example, while the models would predict contemporaneous unemployment peaks and loan defaults, this may not occur when borrowers can request payment deferrals. Thus, for the affected population, economic conditions are not fully considered as a part of Trustmark’s quantitative reserve.  The second principle is the change in risk that is identified by rating changes. As a part of Trustmark’s credit review process, loans in the affected population have been given more frequent screening to ensure accurate ratings are maintained through this dynamic period. Trustmark’s quantitative reserve does not directly address changes in ratings, thus a migration qualitative factor was designed to work in concert with the quantitative reserve. In a downturn, the qualitative factor is inactive for most pools because changes in ratings are congruent with changes in macroeconomic conditions, which directly influence the PD models in the quantitative reserve.

As discussed above, the disconnect of economic factors means that changes in rating caused by deteriorating and weak economic conditions as a result of the pandemic are not being captured in the quantitative reserve.  During the fourth quarter of 2020, due to unforeseen pandemic conditions that varied from Management’s expectations during the third quarter of 2020, additional reserves were further dimensioned in order to appropriately reflect the risk within the portfolio related to the COVID-19 pandemic.  In an effort to ensure the External Factor-Pandemic qualitative factor is reasonable and supportable, historical Trustmark loss data was leveraged to construct a framework that is quantitative in nature.  To dimension the additional reserve, Management uses the sensitivity of the quantitative commercial loan reserve to changes in macroeconomic conditions to apply to loans rated acceptable or better (RR 1-4).  In addition, to account for the known changes in risk, a weighted average of the commercial loan portfolio loss rate, derived from the performance trends qualitative factor, is used to dimension additional reserves for downgraded credits.  Loans rated acceptable with risk (RR 5) or watch (RR 6) received the additional reserves based on the average of the macroeconomic conditions and weighted- average of the commercial loan portfolio loss rate while the loans rated special mention and substandard received additional reserves based on the weighted-average described above.

33


 

The following tables disaggregate the ACL and the amortized cost basis of the loans by the measurement methodology used at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

 

ACL

 

 

LHFI

 

 

 

Individually Evaluated for Credit Loss

 

 

Collectively Evaluated for Credit Loss

 

 

Total ACL

 

 

Individually Evaluated for Credit Loss

 

 

Collectively Evaluated for Credit Loss

 

 

Total LHFI

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

 

 

$

5,110

 

 

$

5,110

 

 

$

5,903

 

 

 

526,734

 

 

$

532,637

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

 

10,399

 

 

 

10,399

 

 

 

 

 

 

507,733

 

 

 

507,733

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

 

 

 

44,416

 

 

 

44,416

 

 

 

11,763

 

 

 

2,807,899

 

 

 

2,819,662

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

 

 

 

5,311

 

 

 

5,311

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

1,078,565

 

 

 

1,078,622

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

6,530

 

 

 

6,530

 

 

 

 

 

 

827,665

 

 

 

827,665

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

 

2,910

 

 

 

2,910

 

 

 

1,376

 

 

 

1,301,287

 

 

 

1,302,663

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

577

 

 

 

13,396

 

 

 

13,973

 

 

 

4,474

 

 

 

1,322,131

 

 

 

1,326,605

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

4,876

 

 

 

4,876

 

 

 

 

 

 

156,075

 

 

 

156,075

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

1,584

 

 

 

1,649

 

 

 

3,233

 

 

 

3,854

 

 

 

1,132,910

 

 

 

1,136,764

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

2,088

 

 

 

5,186

 

 

 

7,274

 

 

 

5,451

 

 

 

458,992

 

 

 

464,443

 

Total

 

$

4,249

 

 

$

99,783

 

 

$

104,032

 

 

$

32,878

 

 

$

10,119,991

 

 

$

10,152,869

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

ACL

 

 

LHFI

 

 

 

Individually Evaluated

 

 

Collectively Evaluated

 

 

Total

 

 

Individually Evaluated

 

 

Collectively Evaluated

 

 

Total

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

 

 

$

6,854

 

 

$

6,854

 

 

$

5,756

 

 

$

508,300

 

 

$

514,056

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

 

9,928

 

 

 

9,928

 

 

 

454

 

 

 

524,278

 

 

 

524,732

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

 

 

 

48,523

 

 

 

48,523

 

 

 

12,037

 

 

 

2,696,989

 

 

 

2,709,026

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

 

 

 

7,382

 

 

 

7,382

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

1,065,904

 

 

 

1,065,964

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

 

8,158

 

 

 

8,158

 

 

 

 

 

 

794,983

 

 

 

794,983

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

 

5,143

 

 

 

5,143

 

 

 

1,441

 

 

 

1,214,959

 

 

 

1,216,400

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

579

 

 

 

14,272

 

 

 

14,851

 

 

 

14,076

 

 

 

1,295,002

 

 

 

1,309,078

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

 

5,838

 

 

 

5,838

 

 

 

 

 

 

164,386

 

 

 

164,386

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

1,700

 

 

 

1,490

 

 

 

3,190

 

 

 

3,970

 

 

 

996,806

 

 

 

1,000,776

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

2,100

 

 

 

5,339

 

 

 

7,439

 

 

 

5,615

 

 

 

519,508

 

 

 

525,123

 

Total

 

$

4,379

 

 

$

112,927

 

 

$

117,306

 

 

$

43,409

 

 

$

9,781,115

 

 

$

9,824,524

 

Changes in the ACL were as follows for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

109,191

 

 

$

100,564

 

 

$

117,306

 

 

$

84,277

 

FASB ASU 2016-13 adoption adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LHFI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,039

)

Allowance for loan losses, acquired loans transfer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

815

 

Acquired loans ACL adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,007

 

Loans charged-off

 

 

(4,828

)

 

 

(1,870

)

 

 

(6,073

)

 

 

(7,415

)

Recoveries

 

 

3,660

 

 

 

2,309

 

 

 

7,291

 

 

 

4,777

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

 

(1,168

)

 

 

439

 

 

 

1,218

 

 

 

(2,638

)

PCL

 

 

(3,991

)

 

 

18,185

 

 

 

(14,492

)

 

 

38,766

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

104,032

 

 

$

119,188

 

 

$

104,032

 

 

$

119,188

 

34


 

 

The following tables detail changes in the ACL by loan class for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at Beginning of Period

 

 

Charge-offs

 

 

Recoveries

 

 

PCL

 

 

Balance at End of Period

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

 

 

$

5,058

 

 

$

 

 

$

313

 

 

$

(261

)

 

$

5,110

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

8,667

 

 

 

(58

)

 

 

181

 

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

10,399

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

 

 

46,438

 

 

 

(79

)

 

 

1,027

 

 

 

(2,970

)

 

 

44,416

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

 

 

5,770

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(464

)

 

 

5,311

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

5,124

 

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

1,363

 

 

 

6,530

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

3,753

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

8

 

 

 

(847

)

 

 

2,910

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

 

 

20,166

 

 

 

(3,674

)

 

 

652

 

 

 

(3,171

)

 

 

13,973

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

4,750

 

 

 

(391

)

 

 

387

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

4,876

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

3,015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

218

 

 

 

3,233

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

 

 

6,450

 

 

 

(622

)

 

 

1,044

 

 

 

402

 

 

 

7,274

 

Total

 

 

 

$

109,191

 

 

$

(4,828

)

 

$

3,660

 

 

$

(3,991

)

 

$

104,032

 

 

The decreases in the PCL for the three months ended June 30, 2021 were primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic forecasting variables used in the ACL modeling, such as National and Southern Unemployment, National GDP, Prime Rate and South Vacancy Rate and the implementation of the PD and LGD floors.

The PCL for the other construction portfolio and other secured by 1-4 family residential properties increased $1.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2021 primarily due to the implementation of the PD and LGD floors using Trustmark’s historical experience.  

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Balance at Beginning of Period

 

 

Charge-offs

 

 

Recoveries

 

 

PCL

 

 

Balance at End of Period

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

9,079

 

 

$

(7

)

 

$

92

 

 

$

2,776

 

 

$

11,940

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

11,711

 

 

 

(36

)

 

 

83

 

 

 

958

 

 

 

12,716

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

28,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

445

 

 

 

7,845

 

 

 

36,417

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

5,273

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

2,315

 

 

 

7,600

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

7,711

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

3,071

 

 

 

10,803

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

8,042

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

2,844

 

 

 

10,899

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

14,564

 

 

 

(297

)

 

 

191

 

 

 

(1,908

)

 

 

12,550

 

Consumer loans

 

 

6,596

 

 

 

(671

)

 

 

468

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

6,397

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

3,441

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

3,414

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

6,020

 

 

 

(859

)

 

 

984

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

6,452

 

Total

 

$

100,564

 

 

$

(1,870

)

 

$

2,309

 

 

$

18,185

 

 

$

119,188

 

 

The increases in the PCL for loans and other loans secured by real estate during the three months ended June 30, 2020 were primarily due to the negative impact of COVID-19 on the macroeconomic forecasting variables used in the ACL modeling, such as National and Southern Unemployment, National GDP, Prime Rate and Southern Vacancy Rate.

 

The PCL for the commercial and industrial loan portfolio decreased an $1.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to upgrades of loans from substandard to pass, paydowns and a slight decrease in the calculated PD and LGD, which uses Trustmark’s historical data.

 

35


 

 

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at Beginning of Period

 

 

Charge-offs

 

 

Recoveries

 

 

PCL

 

 

Balance at End of Period

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

 

 

$

6,854

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,079

 

 

$

(2,823

)

 

$

5,110

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

9,928

 

 

 

(84

)

 

 

252

 

 

 

303

 

 

 

10,399

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

 

 

48,523

 

 

 

(79

)

 

 

1,057

 

 

 

(5,085

)

 

 

44,416

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

 

 

7,382

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

(2,082

)

 

 

5,311

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

 

 

8,158

 

 

 

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

(1,672

)

 

 

6,530

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

 

 

5,143

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

108

 

 

 

(2,337

)

 

 

2,910

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

 

 

14,851

 

 

 

(3,697

)

 

 

1,939

 

 

 

880

 

 

 

13,973

 

Consumer loans

 

 

 

 

5,838

 

 

 

(833

)

 

 

749

 

 

 

(878

)

 

 

4,876

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

 

 

3,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

3,233

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

 

 

7,439

 

 

 

(1,376

)

 

 

2,052

 

 

 

(841

)

 

 

7,274

 

Total

 

 

 

$

117,306

 

 

$

(6,073

)

 

$

7,291

 

 

$

(14,492

)

 

$

104,032

 

 

Decreases in the PCL for the first six months of 2021 were primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic forecasting variables used in the ACL modeling, such as National and Southern Unemployment, National GDP, Prime Rate and Southern Vacancy Rate.

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Balance at Beginning of Period

 

 

FASB ASU 2016-13 Adoption Adjustment

 

 

Charge-offs

 

 

Recoveries

 

 

PCL

 

 

Balance at End of Period

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

6,371

 

 

$

(188

)

 

$

(7

)

 

$

186

 

 

$

5,578

 

 

$

11,940

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

5,888

 

 

 

4,188

 

 

 

(100

)

 

 

146

 

 

 

2,594

 

 

 

12,716

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

26,158

 

 

 

(8,179

)

 

 

(2,448

)

 

 

506

 

 

 

20,380

 

 

 

36,417

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

4,024

 

 

 

(765

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

18

 

 

 

4,331

 

 

 

7,600

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

1,889

 

 

 

3,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

5,672

 

 

 

10,803

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

3,044

 

 

 

2,891

 

 

 

(19

)

 

 

106

 

 

 

4,877

 

 

 

10,899

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

25,992

 

 

 

(8,964

)

 

 

(1,279

)

 

 

733

 

 

 

(3,932

)

 

 

12,550

 

Consumer loans

 

 

3,379

 

 

 

2,059

 

 

 

(1,361

)

 

 

941

 

 

 

1,379

 

 

 

6,397

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

2,229

 

 

 

2,455

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,270

)

 

 

3,414

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

5,303

 

 

 

2,084

 

 

 

(2,193

)

 

 

2,101

 

 

 

(843

)

 

 

6,452

 

Total

 

$

84,277

 

 

$

(1,217

)

 

$

(7,415

)

 

$

4,777

 

 

$

38,766

 

 

$

119,188

 

 

The increase in the PCL for loans and other loans secured by real estate and consumer loans during the six months ended June 30, 2020 were primarily due to the negative impact of COVID-19 on the macroeconomic forecasting variables used in the ACL modeling, such as National and Southern Unemployment, National GDP, Prime Rate and Southern Vacancy Rate.

The PCL for the commercial and industrial loan portfolio decreased $3.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to loans that had been specifically reserved for being charged down, upgrades on loans from substandard to pass, paydowns as well as a slight decrease in the calculated PD and LGD, which uses Trustmark’s historical data.  The decrease in the PCL for state and other political subdivision loans of $1.3 million was primarily due to a decrease in reserves based on routine updates to the qualitative portion of the allowance calculation.  The PCL for other commercial loans decreased $843 thousand during the same time period due to a pay-off which decreased needed reserves.

 

36


 

 

Note 4 – Mortgage Banking

Mortgage Servicing Rights

The activity in the mortgage servicing rights (MSR) is detailed in the table below for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

66,464

 

 

$

79,394

 

Origination of servicing assets

 

 

15,201

 

 

 

12,396

 

Change in fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due to market changes

 

 

9,231

 

 

 

(27,158

)

Due to run-off

 

 

(10,132

)

 

 

(6,821

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

80,764

 

 

$

57,811

 

 

Trustmark determines the fair value of the MSR using a valuation model administered by a third party that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income.  Trustmark considers the conditional prepayment rate (CPR), which is an estimated loan prepayment rate that uses historical prepayment rates for previous loans similar to the loans being evaluated, and the discount rate in determining the fair value of the MSR. An increase in either the CPR or discount rate assumption will result in a decrease in the fair value of the MSR, while a decrease in either assumption will result in an increase in the fair value of the MSR.  At June 30, 2021, the fair value of the MSR included an assumed average prepayment speed of 12 CPR and an average discount rate of 9.54% compared to an assumed average prepayment speed of 17 CPR and an average discount rate of 9.58% at June 30, 2020.

Mortgage Loans Serviced/Sold

During the first six months of 2021 and 2020, Trustmark sold $1.289 billion and $1.103 billion, respectively, of residential mortgage loans.  Gains on these sales were recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and totaled $34.2 million for the first six months of 2021 compared to $48.4 million for the first six months of 2020. 

The table below details the mortgage loans sold and serviced for others at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Federal National Mortgage Association

 

$

4,718,042

 

 

$

4,629,670

 

Government National Mortgage Association

 

 

3,077,238

 

 

 

2,960,760

 

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

 

 

43,040

 

 

 

50,459

 

Other

 

 

14,773

 

 

 

16,201

 

Total mortgage loans sold and serviced for others

 

$

7,853,093

 

 

$

7,657,090

 

 

Trustmark is subject to losses in its loan servicing portfolio due to loan foreclosures.  Trustmark has obligations to either repurchase the outstanding principal balance of a loan or make the purchaser whole for the economic benefits of a loan if it is determined that the loan sold was in violation of representations or warranties made by Trustmark at the time of the sale, herein referred to as mortgage loan servicing putback expenses.  Such representations and warranties typically include those made regarding loans that had missing or insufficient file documentation, loans that do not meet investor guidelines, loans in which the appraisal does not support the value and/or loans obtained through fraud by the borrowers or other third parties.  Generally, putback requests may be made until the loan is paid in full.  However, mortgage loans delivered to Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) on or after January 1, 2013 are subject to the Lending and Selling Representations and Warranties Framework, which provides certain instances in which FNMA and FHLMC will not exercise their remedies, including a putback request, for breaches of certain selling representations and warranties, such as payment history and quality control review.

 

When a putback request is received, Trustmark evaluates the request and takes appropriate actions based on the nature of the request.  Trustmark is required by FNMA and FHLMC to provide a response to putback requests within 60 days of the date of receipt.  The total mortgage loan servicing putback expenses are included in other expense.  At both June 30, 2021 and 2020, Trustmark had a reserve for mortgage loan servicing putback expenses of $500 thousand.

There is inherent uncertainty in reasonably estimating the requirement for reserves against potential future mortgage loan servicing putback expenses.  Future putback expenses are dependent on many subjective factors, including the review procedures of the purchasers and the potential refinance activity on loans sold with servicing released and the subsequent consequences under the representations and warranties.  Trustmark believes that it has appropriately reserved for potential mortgage loan servicing putback requests.

37


 

 

 

Note 5 – Other Real Estate

At June 30, 2021, Trustmark’s geographic other real estate distribution was concentrated primarily in its five key market regions: Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas.  The ultimate recovery of a substantial portion of the carrying amount of other real estate is susceptible to changes in market conditions in these areas.

For the periods presented, changes and gains (losses), net on other real estate were as follows ($ in thousands):

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

11,651

 

 

$

29,248

 

Additions

 

 

382

 

 

 

406

 

Disposals

 

 

(1,149

)

 

 

(10,534

)

Write-downs

 

 

(1,445

)

 

 

(844

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

9,439

 

 

$

18,276

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains (losses), net on the sale of other real estate included in

   other real estate expense

 

$

18

 

 

$

(255

)

 

At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, other real estate by type of property consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Construction, land development and other land properties

 

$

3,249

 

 

$

3,857

 

1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1,204

 

 

 

1,349

 

Nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

4,986

 

 

 

6,445

 

Total other real estate

 

$

9,439

 

 

$

11,651

 

 

At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, other real estate by geographic location consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Alabama

 

$

2,830

 

 

$

3,271

 

Mississippi (1)

 

 

6,550

 

 

 

8,330

 

Tennessee (2)

 

 

59

 

 

 

50

 

Total other real estate

 

$

9,439

 

 

$

11,651

 

 

(1)

Mississippi includes Central and Southern Mississippi Regions.

(2)

Tennessee includes Memphis, Tennessee and Northern Mississippi Regions.

At June 30, 2021, the balance of other real estate included $1.2 million of foreclosed residential real estate properties recorded as a result of obtaining physical possession of the property compared to $1.3 million at December 31, 2020. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process was $1.4 million and $424 thousand, respectively.

 

38


 

 

Note 6 – Leases

The following table details the components of net lease cost for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Finance leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

 

$

387

 

 

$

481

 

 

$

771

 

 

$

978

 

Interest on lease liabilities

 

 

56

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

132

 

Operating lease cost

 

 

1,342

 

 

 

1,289

 

 

 

2,647

 

 

 

2,579

 

Short-term lease cost

 

 

110

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

229

 

 

 

220

 

Variable lease cost

 

 

311

 

 

 

332

 

 

 

618

 

 

 

679

 

Sublease income

 

 

(77

)

 

 

(63

)

 

 

(153

)

 

 

(162

)

Net lease cost

 

$

2,129

 

 

$

2,215

 

 

$

4,225

 

 

$

4,426

 

 

The following table details the cash payments included in the measurement of lease liabilities during the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Finance leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating cash flows included in operating activities

 

$

113

 

 

$

132

 

Financing cash flows included in payments under finance lease obligations

 

 

712

 

 

 

905

 

Operating leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating cash flows (fixed payments) included in other operating activities, net

 

 

2,267

 

 

 

2,493

 

Operating cash flows (liability reduction) included in other operating activities, net

 

 

1,954

 

 

 

1,949

 

 

The following table details balance sheet information, as well as weighted-average lease terms and discount rates, related to leases at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Finance lease right-of-use assets, net of accumulated depreciation

 

$

6,792

 

 

$

7,471

 

Finance lease liabilities

 

 

7,185

 

 

 

7,805

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

33,201

 

 

 

30,901

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

34,959

 

 

 

32,290

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average lease term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance leases

 

8.37 years

 

 

8.53 years

 

Operating leases

 

9.06 years

 

 

8.65 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average discount rate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance leases

 

 

3.15

%

 

 

3.10

%

Operating leases

 

 

3.16

%

 

 

3.41

%

 

At June 30, 2021, future minimum rental commitments under finance and operating leases were as follows ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Finance Leases

 

 

Operating Leases

 

2021 (excluding the six months ended June 30, 2021)

 

$

828

 

 

$

2,525

 

2022

 

 

1,597

 

 

 

4,864

 

2023

 

 

885

 

 

 

4,670

 

2024

 

 

572

 

 

 

4,713

 

2025

 

 

584

 

 

 

4,752

 

Thereafter

 

 

3,868

 

 

 

18,743

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

 

8,334

 

 

 

40,267

 

Less imputed interest

 

 

(1,149

)

 

 

(5,308

)

Lease liabilities

 

$

7,185

 

 

$

34,959

 

 

 

39


 

 

Note 7 – Deposits

At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, deposits consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Noninterest-bearing demand

 

$

4,446,991

 

 

$

4,349,010

 

Interest-bearing demand

 

 

4,208,521

 

 

 

3,646,246

 

Savings

 

 

4,694,346

 

 

 

4,647,610

 

Time

 

 

1,282,226

 

 

 

1,405,898

 

Total

 

$

14,632,084

 

 

$

14,048,764

 

 

 

Note 8 – Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements

Trustmark utilizes securities sold under repurchase agreements as a source of borrowing in connection with overnight repurchase agreements offered to commercial deposit customers by using its unencumbered investment securities as collateral.  Trustmark accounts for its securities sold under repurchase agreements as secured borrowings in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 860-30, “Transfers and Servicing – Secured Borrowing and Collateral.”  Securities sold under repurchase agreements are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction.  Trustmark monitors collateral levels on a continual basis and may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities.  Securities sold under repurchase agreements were secured by securities with a carrying amount of $179.6 million and $156.1 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.  Trustmark’s repurchase agreements are transacted under master repurchase agreements that give Trustmark, in the event of default by the counterparty, the right of offset with the same counterparty.  As of June 30, 2021, all repurchase agreements were short-term and consisted primarily of sweep repurchase arrangements, under which excess deposits are “swept” into overnight repurchase agreements with Trustmark.  The following table presents the securities sold under repurchase agreements by collateral pledged at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage pass-through securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued by FNMA and FHLMC

 

$

109,707

 

 

$

115,357

 

Other residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued or guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA

 

 

921

 

 

 

12,696

 

Total securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

$

110,628

 

 

$

128,053

 

 

Note 9 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Trustmark accounts for revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which provides that revenue be recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration Trustmark expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.  Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized either over time in a manner that depicts Trustmark’s performance, or at a point in time when control of the goods or services are transferred to the customer.  Trustmark’s noninterest income, excluding all of mortgage banking, net and securities gains (losses), net and portions of bank card and other fees and other income, are considered within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 606.  Gains or losses on the sale of other real estate, which are included in Trustmark’s noninterest expense as other real estate expense, are also within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 606.

Trustmark records a gain or loss from the sale of other real estate when control of the property transfers to the buyer.  Trustmark records the gain or loss from the sale of other real estate in noninterest expense as other real estate expense, net.  Other real estate sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 resulted in a net loss of $41 thousand and a net gain of $18 thousand, respectively, compared to net losses of $185 thousand and $255 thousand for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.

40


 

The following table presents noninterest income disaggregated by reportable operating segment and revenue stream for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Topic 606

 

 

Not Topic

606 (1)

 

 

Total

 

 

Topic 606

 

 

Not Topic

606 (1)

 

 

Total

 

General Banking Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

$

7,591

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,591

 

 

$

6,380

 

 

$

 

 

$

6,380

 

Bank card and other fees

 

 

8,519

 

 

 

(228

)

 

 

8,291

 

 

 

6,549

 

 

 

1,160

 

 

 

7,709

 

Mortgage banking, net

 

 

 

 

 

17,333

 

 

 

17,333

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,745

 

 

 

33,745

 

Wealth management

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

 

 

 

79

 

Other, net

 

 

1,699

 

 

 

251

 

 

 

1,950

 

 

 

1,354

 

 

 

784

 

 

 

2,138

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

17,811

 

 

$

17,356

 

 

$

35,167

 

 

$

14,362

 

 

$

35,689

 

 

$

50,051

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wealth Management Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

$

22

 

 

$

 

 

$

22

 

 

$

17

 

 

$

 

 

$

17

 

Bank card and other fees

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

Wealth management

 

 

8,944

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,944

 

 

 

7,492

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,492

 

Other, net

 

 

35

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

33

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

9,011

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

9,020

 

 

$

7,541

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

7,550

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance commissions

 

$

12,217

 

 

$

 

 

$

12,217

 

 

$

11,868

 

 

$

 

 

$

11,868

 

Other, net

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

12,224

 

 

$

 

 

$

12,224

 

 

$

11,910

 

 

$

 

 

$

11,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

$

7,613

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,613

 

 

$

6,397

 

 

$

 

 

$

6,397

 

Bank card and other fees

 

 

8,529

 

 

 

(228

)

 

 

8,301

 

 

 

6,557

 

 

 

1,160

 

 

 

7,717

 

Mortgage banking, net

 

 

 

 

 

17,333

 

 

 

17,333

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,745

 

 

 

33,745

 

Insurance commissions

 

 

12,217

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,217

 

 

 

11,868

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,868

 

Wealth management

 

 

8,946

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,946

 

 

 

7,571

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,571

 

Other, net

 

 

1,741

 

 

 

260

 

 

 

2,001

 

 

 

1,420

 

 

 

793

 

 

 

2,213

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

39,046

 

 

$

17,365

 

 

$

56,411

 

 

$

33,813

 

 

$

35,698

 

 

$

69,511

 

(1)

41


 

Noninterest income not in scope for FASB ASC Topic 606 includes customer derivatives revenue and miscellaneous credit card fee income within bank card and other fees; mortgage banking, net; amortization of tax credits, accretion of the FDIC indemnification asset, cash surrender value on various life insurance policies, earnings on Trustmark’s non-qualified deferred compensation plans, other partnership investments and rental income within other, net; and security gains (losses), net.

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Topic 606

 

 

Not Topic

606 (1)

 

 

Total

 

 

Topic 606

 

 

Not Topic

606 (1)

 

 

Total

 

General Banking Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

$

14,929

 

 

$

 

 

$

14,929

 

 

$

16,392

 

 

$

 

 

$

16,392

 

Bank card and other fees

 

 

15,703

 

 

 

2,052

 

 

 

17,755

 

 

 

13,275

 

 

 

(217

)

 

 

13,058

 

Mortgage banking, net

 

 

 

 

 

38,137

 

 

 

38,137

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,228

 

 

 

61,228

 

Wealth management

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

 

 

 

165

 

Other, net

 

 

3,087

 

 

 

891

 

 

 

3,978

 

 

 

3,118

 

 

 

1,266

 

 

 

4,384

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

33,739

 

 

$

41,080

 

 

$

74,819

 

 

$

32,950

 

 

$

62,277

 

 

$

95,227

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wealth Management Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

$

40

 

 

$

 

 

$

40

 

 

$

37

 

 

$

 

 

$

37

 

Bank card and other fees

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

Wealth management

 

 

17,342

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,342

 

 

 

15,943

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,943

 

Other, net

 

 

67

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

72

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

17,467

 

 

$

16

 

 

$

17,483

 

 

$

16,044

 

 

$

22

 

 

$

16,066

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance commissions

 

$

24,662

 

 

$

 

 

$

24,662

 

 

$

23,418

 

 

$

 

 

$

23,418

 

Other, net

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

 

 

 

64

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

24,692

 

 

$

 

 

$

24,692

 

 

$

23,482

 

 

$

 

 

$

23,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

$

14,969

 

 

$

 

 

$

14,969

 

 

$

16,429

 

 

$

 

 

$

16,429

 

Bank card and other fees

 

 

15,721

 

 

 

2,052

 

 

 

17,773

 

 

 

13,289

 

 

 

(217

)

 

 

13,072

 

Mortgage banking, net

 

 

 

 

 

38,137

 

 

 

38,137

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,228

 

 

 

61,228

 

Insurance commissions

 

 

24,662

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,662

 

 

 

23,418

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,418

 

Wealth management

 

 

17,362

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,362

 

 

 

16,108

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,108

 

Other, net

 

 

3,184

 

 

 

907

 

 

 

4,091

 

 

 

3,232

 

 

 

1,288

 

 

 

4,520

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

75,898

 

 

$

41,096

 

 

$

116,994

 

 

$

72,476

 

 

$

62,299

 

 

$

134,775

 

(1)

Noninterest income not in scope for FASB ASC Topic 606 includes customer derivatives revenue and miscellaneous credit card fee income within bank card and other fees; mortgage banking, net; amortization of tax credits, accretion of the FDIC indemnification asset, cash surrender value on various life insurance policies, earnings on Trustmark’s non-qualified deferred compensation plans, other partnership investments and rental income within other, net; and security gains (losses), net.

 

 

Note 10 – Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Benefits

Qualified Pension Plan

Trustmark maintains a noncontributory tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan titled the Trustmark Corporation Pension Plan for Certain Employees of Acquired Financial Institutions (the Continuing Plan) to satisfy commitments made by Trustmark to associates covered through plans obtained in acquisitions.

 

The following table presents information regarding the net periodic benefit cost for the Continuing Plan for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Service cost

 

$

63

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

126

 

 

$

127

 

Interest cost

 

 

43

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

121

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(32

)

 

 

(39

)

 

 

(65

)

 

 

(77

)

Recognized net loss due to lump sum settlements

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

Recognized net actuarial loss

 

 

148

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

297

 

 

 

163

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

222

 

 

$

207

 

 

$

444

 

 

$

374

 

 

42


 

 

For the plan year ending December 31, 2021, Trustmark’s minimum required contribution to the Continuing Plan is $324 thousand; however, Management and the Board of Directors of Trustmark will monitor the Continuing Plan throughout 2021 to determine any additional funding requirements by the plan’s measurement date, which is December 31.

Supplemental Retirement Plans

Trustmark maintains a nonqualified supplemental retirement plan covering key executive officers and senior officers as well as directors who have elected to defer fees.  The plan provides for retirement and/or death benefits based on a participant’s covered salary or deferred fees.  Although plan benefits may be paid from Trustmark’s general assets, Trustmark has purchased life insurance contracts on the participants covered under the plan, which may be used to fund future benefit payments under the plan.  The annual measurement date for the plan is December 31.  As a result of mergers prior to 2014, Trustmark became the administrator of small nonqualified supplemental retirement plans, for which the plan benefits were frozen prior to the merger date.

The following table presents information regarding the net periodic benefit cost for Trustmark’s nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Service cost

 

$

19

 

 

$

20

 

 

$

38

 

 

$

39

 

Interest cost

 

 

277

 

 

 

387

 

 

 

570

 

 

 

801

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

28

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

75

 

Recognized net actuarial loss

 

 

295

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

601

 

 

 

482

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

619

 

 

$

681

 

 

$

1,265

 

 

$

1,397

 

 

 

Note 11 – Stock and Incentive Compensation

Trustmark has granted stock and incentive compensation awards and units subject to the provisions of the Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (the Stock Plan).  Current outstanding and future grants of stock and incentive compensation awards are subject to the provisions of the Stock Plan, which is designed to provide flexibility to Trustmark regarding its ability to motivate, attract and retain the services of key associates and directors.  The Stock Plan also allows Trustmark to grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units to key associates and directors.

Restricted Stock Grants

Performance Awards

Trustmark’s performance awards vest over three years and are granted to Trustmark’s executive and senior management teams.  Performance awards granted vest based on performance goals of return on average tangible equity and total shareholder return.  Performance awards are valued utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate fair value of the awards at the grant date.  The Monte Carlo simulation was performed by an independent valuation consultant and requires the use of subjective modeling assumptions.  These awards are recognized using the straight-line method over the requisite service period.  These awards provide for achievement shares if performance measures exceed 100%.  The restricted share agreement for these awards provides for voting rights and dividend privileges.  During 2020, Trustmark began granting performance units instead of performance awards. The performance units have the same attributes as the previously granted performance awards, except the performance units do not provide voting rights.

Time-Vested Awards

Trustmark’s time-vested awards vest over three years and are granted to members of Trustmark’s Board of Directors as well as Trustmark’s executive and senior management teams.  Time-vested awards are valued utilizing the fair value of Trustmark’s stock at the grant date.  These awards are recognized on the straight-line method over the requisite service period.  During 2020, Trustmark began granting time-vested units instead of time-vested awards.  The time-vested units have the same attributes as the previously granted time-vested awards, except the time-vested units do not provide voting rights.

43


 

The following tables summarize the Stock Plan activity for the periods presented:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Performance

Awards and Units

 

 

Time-Vested

Awards and Units

 

Nonvested shares, beginning of period

 

 

144,554

 

 

 

362,556

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

2,750

 

Released from restriction

 

 

 

 

 

(8,846

)

Forfeited

 

 

(2,585

)

 

 

(4,405

)

Nonvested shares, end of period

 

 

141,969

 

 

 

352,055

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Performance

Awards and Units

 

 

Time-Vested

Awards and Units

 

Nonvested shares, beginning of period

 

 

145,042

 

 

 

301,619

 

Granted

 

 

53,273

 

 

 

176,022

 

Released from restriction

 

 

(44,536

)

 

 

(120,290

)

Forfeited

 

 

(11,810

)

 

 

(5,296

)

Nonvested shares, end of period

 

 

141,969

 

 

 

352,055

 

 

The following table presents information regarding compensation expense for awards and units under the Stock Plan for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Performance awards and units

 

$

324

 

 

$

456

 

 

$

206

 

 

$

(57

)

Time-vested awards and units

 

 

890

 

 

 

818

 

 

 

3,189

 

 

 

2,725

 

Total compensation expense

 

$

1,214

 

 

$

1,274

 

 

$

3,395

 

 

$

2,668

 

 

 

Note 12 – Contingencies

Lending Related

Trustmark makes commitments to extend credit and issues standby and commercial letters of credit (letters of credit) in the normal course of business in order to fulfill the financing needs of its customers.  The carrying amount of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit approximates the fair value of such financial instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend money to customers pursuant to certain specified conditions.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses.  Because many of these commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  The exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the commitments to extend credit is represented by the contract amount of those instruments.  Trustmark applies the same credit policies and standards as it does in the lending process when making these commitments.  The collateral obtained is based upon the nature of the transaction and the assessed creditworthiness of the borrower.  At June 30, 2021 and 2020, Trustmark had unused commitments to extend credit of $4.803 billion and $4.391 billion, respectively.

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Trustmark to insure the performance of a customer to a third-party.  A financial standby letter of credit irrevocably obligates Trustmark to pay a third-party beneficiary when a customer fails to repay an outstanding loan or debt instrument.  A performance standby letter of credit irrevocably obligates Trustmark to pay a third-party beneficiary when a customer fails to perform some contractual, nonfinancial obligation.  When issuing letters of credit, Trustmark uses the same policies regarding credit risk and collateral, which are followed in the lending process.  At June 30, 2021 and 2020, Trustmark’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the customer for letters of credit was $132.2 million and $105.7 million, respectively.  These amounts consist primarily of commitments with maturities of less than three years, which have an immaterial carrying value.  Trustmark holds collateral to support standby letters of credit when deemed necessary.  As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the fair value of collateral held was $40.2 million and $21.8 million, respectively.

44


 

ACL on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures

Trustmark maintains a separate ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, which is included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.  

Changes in the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures were as follows for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

29,205

 

 

$

36,421

 

 

$

38,572

 

 

$

 

FASB ASU 2016-13 adoption adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,638

 

PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures (1)

 

 

4,528

 

 

 

6,242

 

 

 

(4,839

)

 

 

13,025

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

33,733

 

 

$

42,663

 

 

$

33,733

 

 

$

42,663

 

 

(1)

During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark reclassified its credit loss expense related to off-balance sheet credit exposures from noninterest expense to provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures. Prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

Adjustments to the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures are recorded to provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures.  The increase in the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the second quarter of 2021 was primarily due to an increase in the off-balance sheet credit exposures as well as the implementation of the PD and LGD floors by portfolio.  The decrease in the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the six months ended June 30, 2021 was primarily due to improvements of the overall economy and macroeconomic factors used to determine the necessary reserves for off-balance sheet credit exposures.  

No credit loss estimate is reported for off-balance sheet credit exposures that are unconditionally cancellable by Trustmark or for undrawn amounts under such arrangements that may be drawn prior to the cancellation of the arrangement.

Legal Proceedings

Trustmark’s wholly-owned subsidiary, TNB, has been named as a defendant in several lawsuits related to the collapse of the Stanford Financial Group.  

On August 23, 2009, a purported class action complaint was filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, by Peggy Roif Rotstain, Guthrie Abbott, Catherine Burnell, Steven Queyrouze, Jaime Alexis Arroyo Bornstein and Juan C. Olano (collectively, Class Plaintiffs), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, naming TNB and four other financial institutions and one individual, each of which are unaffiliated with Trustmark, as defendants.  The complaint seeks to recover (i) alleged fraudulent transfers from each of the defendants in the amount of fees and other monies received by each defendant from entities controlled by R. Allen Stanford (collectively, the Stanford Financial Group) and (ii) damages allegedly attributable to alleged conspiracies by one or more of the defendants with the Stanford Financial Group to commit fraud and/or aid and abet fraud on the asserted grounds that defendants knew or should have known the Stanford Financial Group was conducting an illegal and fraudulent scheme.  Class Plaintiffs have demanded a jury trial.  Class Plaintiffs did not quantify damages.

In November 2009, the lawsuit was removed to federal court by certain defendants and then transferred by the United States Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to federal court in the Northern District of Texas (Dallas) where multiple Stanford related matters are being consolidated for pre-trial proceedings.  In May 2010, all defendants (including TNB) filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit.  In August 2010, the court authorized and approved the formation of an Official Stanford Investors Committee (OSIC) to represent the interests of Stanford investors and, under certain circumstances, to file legal actions for the benefit of Stanford investors.  In December 2011, the OSIC filed a motion to intervene in this action.  In September 2012, the district court referred the case to a magistrate judge for hearing and determination of certain pretrial issues.  In December 2012, the court granted the OSIC’s motion to intervene, and the OSIC filed an Intervenor Complaint against one of the other defendant financial institutions.  In February 2013, the OSIC filed a second Intervenor Complaint that asserts claims against TNB and the remaining defendant financial institutions.  The OSIC seeks to recover: (i) alleged fraudulent transfers in the amount of the fees each of the defendants allegedly received from Stanford Financial Group, the profits each of the defendants allegedly made from Stanford Financial Group deposits, and other monies each of the defendants allegedly received from Stanford Financial Group; (ii) damages attributable to alleged conspiracies by each of the defendants with the Stanford Financial Group to commit fraud and/or aid and abet fraud and conversion on the asserted grounds that the defendants knew or should have known the Stanford Financial Group was conducting an illegal and fraudulent scheme; and (iii) punitive damages.  The OSIC did not quantify damages.  

In July 2013, all defendants (including TNB) filed motions to dismiss the OSIC’s claims.  In March 2015, the court entered an order authorizing the parties to conduct discovery regarding class certification, staying all other discovery and setting a deadline for the

45


 

parties to complete briefing on class certification issues.  In April 2015, the court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss the Class Plaintiffs’ claims and the OSIC’s claims.  The court dismissed all of the Class Plaintiffs’ fraudulent transfer claims and dismissed certain of the OSIC’s claims.  The court denied the motions by TNB and the other financial institution defendants to dismiss the OSIC’s constructive fraudulent transfer claims.  

On June 23, 2015, the court allowed the Class Plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Class Action Complaint (SAC), which asserted new claims against TNB and certain of the other defendants for (i) aiding, abetting and participating in a fraudulent scheme, (ii) aiding, abetting and participating in violations of the Texas Securities Act, (iii) aiding, abetting and participating in breaches of fiduciary duty, (iv) aiding, abetting and participating in conversion and (v) conspiracy.  On July 14, 2015, the defendants (including TNB) filed motions to dismiss the SAC and to reconsider the court’s prior denial to dismiss the OSIC’s constructive fraudulent transfer claims against TNB and the other financial institutions that are defendants in the action.  On July 27, 2016, the court denied the motion by TNB and the other financial institution defendants to dismiss the SAC and also denied the motion by TNB and the other financial institution defendants to reconsider the court’s prior denial to dismiss the OSIC’s constructive fraudulent transfer claims.  On August 24, 2016, TNB filed its answer to the SAC.  On October 20, 2017, the OSIC filed a motion seeking an order lifting the discovery stay and establishing a trial schedule.  On November 4, 2016, the OSIC filed a First Amended Intervenor Complaint, which added claims for (i) aiding, abetting or participation in violations of the Texas Securities Act and (ii) aiding, abetting or participation in the breach of fiduciary duty.  On November 7, 2017, the court denied the Class Plaintiffs’ motion seeking class certification and designation of class representatives and counsel, finding that common issues of fact did not predominate.  The court granted the OSIC’s motion to lift the discovery stay that it had previously ordered.

On May 3, 2019, individual investors and entities filed motions to intervene in the action.  On September 18, 2019, the court denied the motions to intervene.  On October 14, 2019, certain of the proposed intervenors filed a notice of appeal. On February 3, 2021, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of the motions to intervene; this decision was affirmed by a panel of the Fifth Circuit on March 12, 2021.  

On February 12, 2021, all defendants (including TNB) filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to OSIC claims that applied to all defendants.  In addition, on the same date, TNB filed a separate motion for summary judgment with respect to aspects of OSIC claims that applied specifically to TNB.  On March 19, 2021, OSIC filed notice with the court that it was abandoning as against all of the defendants (including TNB) the five claims described above.  As a result, only the claims for (i) aiding, abetting and participating in breaches of fiduciary duty, (ii) aiding, abetting and participating in violations of the Texas Securities Act, and (iii) punitive damages remain as against TNB.  On March 19, 2021, OSIC also filed responses to defendants’ motions for summary judgment.  Briefing on the defendants’ (including TNB’s) summary judgment motions in respect of these remaining claims continues.  

The parties to the action have agreed that the case is to be tried in the District Court for the Southern District of Texas, and it is Trustmark’s understanding that the judge of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas to whom the case is currently assigned has agreed to this transfer, but he has yet to formally remand the case to the Southern District of Texas.  However, on March 25, 2021, the judge to whom the case is currently assigned in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas rescinded his previously-issued trial scheduling orders so that the Southern District of Texas could set scheduling for this case once the case has in fact been remanded.

On December 14, 2009, a different Stanford-related lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Ascension Parish, Louisiana, individually by Harold Jackson, Paul Blaine and Carolyn Bass Smith, Christine Nichols, and Ronald and Ramona Hebert naming TNB (misnamed as Trust National Bank) and other individuals and entities not affiliated with Trustmark as defendants.  The complaint seeks to recover the money lost by these individual plaintiffs as a result of the collapse of the Stanford Financial Group (in addition to other damages) under various theories and causes of action, including negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, detrimental reliance, conspiracy, and violation of Louisiana’s uniform fiduciary, securities, and racketeering laws.  The complaint does not quantify the amount of money the plaintiffs seek to recover.  In January 2010, the lawsuit was removed to federal court by certain defendants and then transferred by the United States Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to federal court in the Northern District of Texas (Dallas) where multiple Stanford related matters are being consolidated for pre-trial proceedings.  On March 29, 2010, the court stayed the case.  TNB filed a motion to lift the stay, which was denied on February 28, 2012.  In September 2012, the district court referred the case to a magistrate judge for hearing and determination of certain pretrial issues.

On April 11, 2016, Trustmark learned that a different Stanford-related lawsuit had been filed on that date in the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario, Canada, by The Toronto-Dominion Bank (“TD Bank”), naming TNB and three other financial institutions not affiliated with Trustmark as defendants (the “TD Bank Declaratory Action”).  The complaint seeks a declaration specifying the degree to which each of TNB and the other defendants are liable in respect of any loss and damage for which TD Bank is found to be liable in separate litigation commenced against TD Bank brought by the joint liquidators of Stanford International Bank Limited in the Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List in Ontario, Canada (the “Joint Liquidators’ Action”), as well as contribution and

46


 

indemnity in respect of any judgment, interest and costs TD Bank is ordered to pay in the Joint Liquidators’ Action.  Trustmark understands that on or about June 8, 2021,  after an extensive trial on the merits, the judge in the Joint Liquidators’ Action ruled in favor of TD Bank and found TD Bank not liable as to the claims asserted against the bank by the joint liquidators of Stanford International Bank Limited.    It is not yet known whether the plaintiffs in the Joint Liquidators’ Action intend to appeal this decision.   TNB was never served in connection with the TD Bank Declaratory Action, and thus did not make an appearance in that action.

On November 1, 2019, TNB was named as a defendant in a complaint filed by Paul Blaine Smith, Carolyn Bass Smith and other plaintiffs identified therein (the Smith Complaint).  The Smith Complaint was filed in Texas state court (District Court, Harris County, Texas) and named TNB and four other financial institutions and one individual, each of which are unaffiliated with Trustmark, as defendants.  The Smith Complaint relates to the collapse of the Stanford Financial Group, as does the other pending litigation relating to Stanford summarized above.  Plaintiffs in the Smith Complaint have demanded a jury trial.

 

On January 15, 2020, the court granted Stanford Financial Group receiver’s motion to stay the Texas state court action.  On February 26, 2020, the lawsuit was removed to federal court in the Southern District of Texas by TNB.  Trustmark and its counsel are carefully evaluating the Smith Complaint in the form that is publicly available, and will update the foregoing description to the extent that additional material facts are ascertained.

TNB’s relationship with the Stanford Financial Group began as a result of Trustmark’s acquisition of a Houston-based bank in August 2006, and consisted of correspondent banking and other traditional banking services in the ordinary course of business.  All Stanford-related lawsuits are in pre-trial stages.

On December 30, 2019, a complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Northern Division by Alysson Mills in her capacity as Court-appointed Receiver (the Receiver) for Arthur Lamar Adams (Adams) and Madison Timber Properties, LLC (Madison Timber), naming TNB, two other Mississippi-based financial institutions both of which are unaffiliated with Trustmark and two individuals, one of who was employed by TNB at all times relevant to the complaint and the other was employed either by TNB or one of the other defendant financial institutions, as defendants.  The complaint seeks to recover from the defendants, for the benefit of the receivership estate and also for certain investors who were allegedly defrauded by Adams and Madison Timber, damages (including punitive damages) and related costs allegedly attributable to actions of the defendants that allegedly enabled illegal and fraudulent activities engaged in by Adams and Madison Timber.  The Receiver did not quantify damages.  Pursuant to a Case Management Order issued by the court on June 16, 2021, a trial date of October 17, 2022 has been set for this action, if the parties are not otherwise able to resolve this matter prior to that date.

TNB’s relationship with Adams and Madison Timber consisted of traditional banking services in the ordinary course of business.

Trustmark and its subsidiaries are also parties to other lawsuits and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of business.  Some of the lawsuits assert claims related to the lending, collection, servicing, investment, trust and other business activities, and some of the lawsuits allege substantial claims for damages.

All pending legal proceedings described above (save for the TD Bank Declaratory Action, in which, as noted above, Trustmark has never been served) are being vigorously contested.  In accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 450-20, “Loss Contingencies,” Trustmark will establish an accrued liability for litigation matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable.  At the present time, Trustmark believes, based on its evaluation and the advice of legal counsel, that a loss in any such proceeding is not probable and a reasonable estimate cannot reasonably be made.

 

Note 13 – Earnings Per Share (EPS)

The following table reflects weighted-average shares used to calculate basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Basic shares

 

 

63,215

 

 

 

63,416

 

 

 

63,305

 

 

 

63,586

 

Dilutive shares

 

 

195

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

136

 

Diluted shares

 

 

63,410

 

 

 

63,555

 

 

 

63,466

 

 

 

63,722

 

 

47


 

 

Weighted-average antidilutive stock awards were excluded in determining diluted EPS. The following table reflects weighted-average antidilutive stock awards for the periods presented (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Weighted-average antidilutive stock awards

 

 

1

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

Note 14 – Statements of Cash Flows

The following table reflects specific transaction amounts for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Income taxes paid

 

$

13,045

 

 

$

23,309

 

Interest expense paid on deposits and borrowings

 

 

13,815

 

 

 

26,808

 

Noncash transfers from loans to other real estate

 

 

382

 

 

 

406

 

Finance right-of-use assets resulting from lease liabilities

 

 

92

 

 

 

 

Operating right-of-use assets resulting from lease liabilities

 

 

4,278

 

 

 

671

 

 

 

Note 15 – Shareholders’ Equity

Regulatory Capital

Trustmark and TNB are subject to minimum risk-based capital and leverage capital requirements, as described in the section captioned “Capital Adequacy” included in Part I. Item 1. – Business of Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report, which are administered by the federal bank regulatory agencies.  These capital requirements, as defined by federal regulations, involve quantitative and qualitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet instruments.  Trustmark’s and TNB’s minimum risk-based capital requirements include a capital conservation buffer of 2.50% at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.  Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, is not included in computing regulatory capital.  Trustmark has elected the five-year phase-in transition period (through December 31, 2024) related to adopting FASB ASU 2016-13 for regulatory capital purposes.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements of Trustmark and TNB and limit Trustmark’s and TNB’s ability to pay dividends.  As of June 30, 2021, Trustmark and TNB exceeded all applicable minimum capital standards.  In addition, Trustmark and TNB met applicable regulatory guidelines to be considered well-capitalized at June 30, 2021.  To be categorized in this manner, Trustmark and TNB maintained, as applicable, minimum common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the accompanying table, and were not subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive issued by their primary federal regulators to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measures.  There are no significant conditions or events that have occurred since June 30, 2021, which Management believes have affected Trustmark’s or TNB’s present classification.

48


 

The following table provides Trustmark’s and TNB’s actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios under regulatory capital standards in effect at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

Actual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regulatory Capital

 

 

Minimum

 

 

To Be Well

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Ratio

 

 

Requirement

 

 

Capitalized

 

At June 30, 2021:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation

 

$

1,441,102

 

 

 

11.76

%

 

 

7.00

%

 

n/a

 

Trustmark National Bank

 

 

1,491,066

 

 

 

12.17

%

 

 

7.00

%

 

 

6.50

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation

 

$

1,501,102

 

 

 

12.25

%

 

 

8.50

%

 

n/a

 

Trustmark National Bank

 

 

1,491,066

 

 

 

12.17

%

 

 

8.50

%

 

 

8.00

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation

 

$

1,728,478

 

 

 

14.10

%

 

 

10.50

%

 

n/a

 

Trustmark National Bank

 

 

1,595,510

 

 

 

13.02

%

 

 

10.50

%

 

 

10.00

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 Leverage (to Average Assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation

 

$

1,501,102

 

 

 

9.00

%

 

 

4.00

%

 

n/a

 

Trustmark National Bank

 

 

1,491,066

 

 

 

8.96

%

 

 

4.00

%

 

 

5.00

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2020:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation

 

$

1,395,844

 

 

 

11.62

%

 

 

7.00

%

 

n/a

 

Trustmark National Bank

 

 

1,412,015

 

 

 

11.75

%

 

 

7.00

%

 

 

6.50

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation

 

$

1,455,844

 

 

 

12.11

%

 

 

8.50

%

 

n/a

 

Trustmark National Bank

 

 

1,412,015

 

 

 

11.75

%

 

 

8.50

%

 

 

8.00

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation

 

$

1,696,794

 

 

 

14.12

%

 

 

10.50

%

 

n/a

 

Trustmark National Bank

 

 

1,530,044

 

 

 

12.73

%

 

 

10.50

%

 

 

10.00

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 Leverage (to Average Assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trustmark Corporation

 

$

1,455,844

 

 

 

9.33

%

 

 

4.00

%

 

n/a

 

Trustmark National Bank

 

 

1,412,015

 

 

 

9.07

%

 

 

4.00

%

 

 

5.00

%

 

 

Stock Repurchase Program

On April 1, 2019, the Board of Directors of Trustmark authorized a stock repurchase program under which $100.0 million of Trustmark’s outstanding common stock could be acquired through March 31, 2020.  Trustmark repurchased approximately 887 thousand shares of its common stock valued at $27.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2020. Under this authority, Trustmark repurchased approximately 1.5 million shares valued at $47.2 million.

On January 28, 2020, the Board of Directors of Trustmark authorized a new stock repurchase program, effective April 1, 2020, under which $100.0 million of Trustmark’s outstanding common stock may be acquired through December 31, 2021.  On March 9, 2020, Trustmark suspended its share repurchase programs to preserve capital to support customers during the COVID-19 pandemic.  Trustmark resumed the repurchase of its shares in January 2021.  Under this authority, Trustmark repurchased approximately 630 thousand shares of its outstanding common stock valued at $20.8 million during three months ended June 30, 2021.  During the first six months of 2021, Trustmark repurchased $25.0 million, or approximately 775 thousand shares of its outstanding common stock. The shares may be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions.  There is no guarantee as to the number of shares that will be repurchased by Trustmark, and Trustmark may discontinue repurchases at any time at Management’s discretion.

49


 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following tables present the net change in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects allocated to each component for the periods presented ($ in thousands).  The amortization of prior service cost, recognized net loss due to lump sum settlements and change in net actuarial loss are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (see Note 10 – Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Benefits for additional details).  Reclassification adjustments related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans are included in salaries and employee benefits and other expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Before Tax

Amount

 

 

Tax (Expense)

Benefit

 

 

Net of Tax

Amount

 

 

Before Tax

Amount

 

 

Tax (Expense)

Benefit

 

 

Net of Tax

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available for sale and transferred securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising

   during the period

 

$

6,612

 

 

$

(1,653

)

 

$

4,959

 

 

$

2,648

 

 

$

(662

)

 

$

1,986

 

Change in net unrealized holding loss on

   securities transferred to held to maturity

 

 

736

 

 

 

(184

)

 

 

552

 

 

 

778

 

 

 

(195

)

 

 

583

 

Total securities available for sale

   and transferred securities

 

 

7,348

 

 

 

(1,837

)

 

 

5,511

 

 

 

3,426

 

 

 

(857

)

 

 

2,569

 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustments for changes realized

   in net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in prior service costs

 

 

28

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

21

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

28

 

Recognized net loss due to lump sum

   settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

30

 

Change in net actuarial loss

 

 

443

 

 

 

(110

)

 

 

333

 

 

 

318

 

 

 

(78

)

 

 

240

 

Total pension and other postretirement benefit

   plans

 

 

471

 

 

 

(117

)

 

 

354

 

 

 

396

 

 

 

(98

)

 

 

298

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

7,819

 

 

$

(1,954

)

 

$

5,865

 

 

$

3,822

 

 

$

(955

)

 

$

2,867

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Before Tax

Amount

 

 

Tax (Expense)

Benefit

 

 

Net of Tax

Amount

 

 

Before Tax

Amount

 

 

Tax (Expense)

Benefit

 

 

Net of Tax

Amount

 

Securities available for sale and transferred securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising

   during the period

 

$

(15,188

)

 

$

3,797

 

 

$

(11,391

)

 

$

43,155

 

 

$

(10,789

)

 

$

32,366

 

Change in net unrealized holding loss on

   securities transferred to held to maturity

 

 

1,447

 

 

 

(362

)

 

 

1,085

 

 

 

1,639

 

 

 

(410

)

 

 

1,229

 

Total securities available for sale

   and transferred securities

 

 

(13,741

)

 

 

3,435

 

 

 

(10,306

)

 

 

44,794

 

 

 

(11,199

)

 

 

33,595

 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustments for changes realized

   in net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in prior service costs

 

 

56

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

42

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

(19

)

 

 

56

 

Recognized net loss due to lump sum

   settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

30

 

Change in net actuarial loss

 

 

898

 

 

 

(224

)

 

 

674

 

 

 

645

 

 

 

(161

)

 

 

484

 

Total pension and other postretirement benefit

   plans

 

 

954

 

 

 

(238

)

 

 

716

 

 

 

760

 

 

 

(190

)

 

 

570

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(12,787

)

 

$

3,197

 

 

$

(9,590

)

 

$

45,554

 

 

$

(11,389

)

 

$

34,165

 

50


 

 

The following table presents the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the periods presented ($ in thousands).  All amounts are presented net of tax.

 

 

 

Securities

Available for Sale

and Transferred

Securities

 

 

Defined

Benefit

Pension Items

 

 

Total

 

Balance at January 1, 2021

 

$

17,331

 

 

$

(18,382

)

 

$

(1,051

)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification

 

 

(10,306

)

 

 

 

 

 

(10,306

)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other

   comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

716

 

 

 

716

 

Net other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(10,306

)

 

 

716

 

 

 

(9,590

)

Balance at June 30, 2021

 

$

7,025

 

 

$

(17,666

)

 

$

(10,641

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2020

 

$

(8,017

)

 

$

(15,583

)

 

$

(23,600

)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification

 

 

33,595

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,595

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other

   comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

570

 

 

 

570

 

Net other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

33,595

 

 

 

570

 

 

 

34,165

 

Balance at June 30, 2020

 

$

25,578

 

 

$

(15,013

)

 

$

10,565

 

 

 

Note 16 – Fair Value

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value

The methodologies Trustmark uses in determining the fair values are based primarily on the use of independent, market-based data to reflect a value that would be reasonably expected upon exchange of the position in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The predominant portion of assets that are stated at fair value are of a nature that can be valued using prices or inputs that are readily observable through a variety of independent data providers.  The providers selected by Trustmark for fair valuation data are widely recognized and accepted vendors whose evaluations support the pricing functions of financial institutions, investment and mutual funds, and portfolio managers.  Trustmark has documented and evaluated the pricing methodologies used by the vendors and maintains internal processes that regularly test valuations for anomalies.

Trustmark utilizes an independent pricing service to advise it on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio.  As part of Trustmark’s procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes.  When a questionable price exists, Trustmark investigates further to determine if the price is valid.  If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value.  Trustmark has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in thorough discussions with the pricing source regarding their methods of price discovery.

Mortgage loan commitments are valued based on the securities prices of similar collateral, term, rate and delivery for which the loan is eligible to deliver in place of the particular security.  Trustmark acquires a broad array of mortgage security prices that are supplied by a market data vendor, which in turn accumulates prices from a broad list of securities dealers.  Prices are processed through a mortgage pipeline management system that accumulates and segregates all loan commitment and forward-sale transactions according to the similarity of various characteristics (maturity, term, rate, and collateral).  Prices are matched to those positions that are deemed to be an eligible substitute or offset (i.e., “deliverable”) for a corresponding security observed in the marketplace.

Trustmark estimates fair value of the MSR through the use of prevailing market participant assumptions and market participant valuation processes.  This valuation is periodically tested and validated against other third-party firm valuations.

Trustmark obtains the fair value of interest rate swaps from a third-party pricing service that uses an industry standard discounted cash flow methodology.  In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk.  In adjusting the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, Trustmark has considered any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.  In conjunction with the FASB’s fair value measurement guidance, Trustmark made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of these derivative financial instruments, which are subject to master netting agreements, on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

51


 

Trustmark has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swaps offered to qualified commercial borrowers fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, while the credit valuation adjustments associated with these derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads.  Trustmark has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest rate swaps and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of these derivatives.  As a result, Trustmark classifies its interest rate swap valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Trustmark also utilizes exchange-traded derivative instruments such as Treasury note futures contracts and option contracts to achieve a fair value return that offsets the changes in fair value of the MSR attributable to interest rates.  Fair values of these derivative instruments are determined from quoted prices in active markets for identical assets therefore allowing them to be classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.  In addition, Trustmark utilizes derivative instruments such as interest rate lock commitments in its mortgage banking area which lack observable inputs for valuation purposes resulting in their inclusion in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

At this time, Trustmark presents no fair values that are derived through internal modeling.  Should positions requiring fair valuation arise that are not relevant to existing methodologies, Trustmark will make every reasonable effort to obtain market participant assumptions, or independent evaluation.

Financial Assets and Liabilities

The following tables summarize financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value ($ in thousands).  There were no transfers between fair value levels for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

$

30,025

 

 

$

30,025

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

U.S. Government agency obligations

 

 

16,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,023

 

 

 

 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

5,807

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,807

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

2,496,884

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,496,884

 

 

 

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

2,548,739

 

 

 

30,025

 

 

 

2,518,714

 

 

 

 

Loans held for sale

 

 

332,132

 

 

 

 

 

 

332,132

 

 

 

 

Mortgage servicing rights

 

 

80,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80,764

 

Other assets - derivatives

 

 

32,172

 

 

 

1,981

 

 

 

26,306

 

 

 

3,885

 

Other liabilities - derivatives

 

 

3,532

 

 

 

233

 

 

 

3,299

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

U.S. Government agency obligations

 

$

18,041

 

 

$

 

 

$

18,041

 

 

$

 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

5,835

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,835

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

1,967,939

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,967,939

 

 

 

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

1,991,815

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,991,815

 

 

 

 

Loans held for sale

 

 

446,951

 

 

 

 

 

 

446,951

 

 

 

 

Mortgage servicing rights

 

 

66,464

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,464

 

Other assets - derivatives

 

 

47,768

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

38,063

 

 

 

9,560

 

Other liabilities - derivatives

 

 

5,324

 

 

 

666

 

 

 

4,658

 

 

 

 

 

52


 

 

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 are summarized as follows ($ in thousands):

 

 

MSR

 

 

Other Assets -

Derivatives

 

Balance, January 1, 2021

 

$

66,464

 

 

$

9,560

 

Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net (1)

 

 

(901

)

 

 

5,857

 

Additions

 

 

15,201

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

(11,532

)

Balance, June 30, 2021

 

$

80,764

 

 

$

3,885

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings

   that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or

   losses still held at June 30, 2021

 

$

9,231

 

 

$

2,592

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, January 1, 2020

 

$

79,394

 

 

$

1,439

 

Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net (1)

 

 

(33,979

)

 

 

22,382

 

Additions

 

 

12,396

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

(9,491

)

Balance, June 30, 2020

 

$

57,811

 

 

$

14,330

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in

   earnings that are attributable to the change in unrealized

   gains or losses still held at June 30, 2020

 

$

(27,158

)

 

$

12,897

 

 

(1)

Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net relating to the MSR includes changes in fair value due to market changes and due to run-off.

Trustmark may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP.  Assets at June 30, 2021, which have been measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, include collateral-dependent LHFI.  A loan is collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral.  The expected credit loss for collateral-dependent loans is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis of the loan and the fair value of the collateral, adjusted for the estimated cost to sell.  Fair value estimates for collateral-dependent loans are derived from appraised values based on the current market value or as is value of the collateral, normally from recently received and reviewed appraisals.  Current appraisals are ordered on an annual basis based on the inspection date or more often if market conditions necessitate.  Appraisals are obtained from state-certified appraisers and are based on certain assumptions, which may include construction or development status and the highest and best use of the property.  These appraisals are reviewed by Trustmark’s Appraisal Review Department to ensure they are acceptable, and values are adjusted down for costs associated with asset disposal.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had outstanding balances of $32.9 million with a related ACL of $4.2 million in collateral-dependent LHFI, compared to outstanding balances of $43.4 million with a related ACL of $4.4 million in collateral-dependent LHFI at December 31, 2020.  The collateral-dependent LHFI are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities

Certain nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include foreclosed assets (upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment), nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, and intangible assets and other nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.

Other real estate includes assets that have been acquired in satisfaction of debt through foreclosure and is recorded at the fair value less cost to sell (estimated fair value) at the time of foreclosure.  Fair value is based on independent appraisals and other relevant factors.  In the determination of fair value subsequent to foreclosure, Management also considers other factors or recent developments, such as changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and anticipated sales values considering plans for disposition, which could result in an adjustment to lower the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals.  Periodic revaluations are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy since assumptions are used that may not be observable in the market.

Foreclosed assets of $5.3 million were remeasured during the first six months of 2021, requiring write-downs of $268 thousand to reach their current fair values compared to $3.2 million of foreclosed assets that were remeasured during the first six months of 2020, requiring write-downs of $873 thousand.

53


 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, are as follows ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Carrying

Value

 

 

Estimated

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying

Value

 

 

Estimated

Fair Value

 

Financial Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level 2 Inputs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and short-term investments

 

$

2,267,224

 

 

$

2,267,224

 

 

$

1,952,554

 

 

$

1,952,554

 

Securities held to maturity

 

 

433,012

 

 

 

452,288

 

 

 

538,072

 

 

 

563,115

 

Level 3 Inputs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net LHFI and PPP loans

 

 

10,214,956

 

 

 

10,183,509

 

 

 

10,317,352

 

 

 

10,312,395

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level 2 Inputs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

 

14,632,084

 

 

 

14,633,322

 

 

 

14,048,764

 

 

 

14,052,863

 

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under

   repurchase agreements

 

 

157,176

 

 

 

157,176

 

 

 

164,519

 

 

 

164,519

 

Other borrowings

 

 

117,223

 

 

 

117,221

 

 

 

168,252

 

 

 

168,252

 

Subordinated notes

 

 

122,932

 

 

 

128,750

 

 

 

122,921

 

 

 

127,500

 

Junior subordinated debt securities

 

 

61,856

 

 

 

48,866

 

 

 

61,856

 

 

 

46,083

 

 

Fair Value Option

Trustmark has elected to account for its mortgage LHFS under the fair value option, with interest income on these mortgage LHFS reported in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI.  The fair value of the mortgage LHFS is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset, adjusted for specific attributes of that loan.  The mortgage LHFS are actively managed and monitored and certain market risks of the loans may be mitigated through the use of derivatives.  These derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net.  The changes in the fair value of LHFS are largely offset by changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, a net gain of $2.3 million and a net loss of $8.3 million, respectively, were recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net for changes in the fair value of LHFS accounted for under the fair value option, compared to a net loss of $445 thousand and a net gain of $7.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.  Interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 included $1.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively, of interest earned on LHFS accounted for under the fair value option, compared to $1.5 million and $2.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.  Election of the fair value option allows Trustmark to reduce the accounting volatility that would otherwise result from the asymmetry created by accounting for the financial instruments at the lower of cost or fair value and the derivatives at fair value.  The fair value option election does not apply to GNMA optional repurchase loans which do not meet the requirements under FASB ASC Topic 825 to be accounted for under the fair value option.  GNMA optional repurchase loans totaled $95.4 million and $141.2 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, and are included in LHFS on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  For additional information regarding GNMA optional repurchase loans, please see the section captioned “Past Due LHFS” included in Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI.

The following table provides information about the fair value and the contractual principal outstanding of LHFS accounted for under the fair value option as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Fair value of LHFS

 

$

236,719

 

 

$

305,791

 

LHFS contractual principal outstanding

 

 

229,631

 

 

 

290,625

 

Fair value less unpaid principal

 

$

7,088

 

 

$

15,166

 

 

 

54


 

 

Note 17 – Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Trustmark utilizes a portfolio of exchange-traded derivative instruments, such as Treasury note futures contracts and option contracts, to achieve a fair value return that economically hedges changes in the fair value of the MSR attributable to interest rates.  These transactions are considered freestanding derivatives that do not otherwise qualify for hedge accounting.  The total notional amount of these derivative instruments was $374.5 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $326.5 million at December 31, 2020.  Changes in the fair value of these exchange-traded derivative instruments are recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and are offset by changes in the fair value of the MSR.  The impact of this strategy resulted in a net positive ineffectiveness of $1.3 million and a net negative ineffectiveness of $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, the impact was a net positive ineffectiveness of $1.5 million and $7.9 million, respectively.

As part of Trustmark’s risk management strategy in the mortgage banking area, derivative instruments such as forward sales contracts are utilized.  Trustmark’s obligations under forward sales contracts consist of commitments to deliver mortgage loans, originated and/or purchased, in the secondary market at a future date.  Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and are offset by changes in the fair value of LHFS.  Trustmark’s off-balance sheet obligations under these derivative instruments totaled $317.5 million at June 30, 2021, with a negative valuation adjustment of $587 thousand, compared to $377.5 million, with a negative valuation adjustment of $3.1 million, at December 31, 2020.

Trustmark also utilizes derivative instruments such as interest rate lock commitments in its mortgage banking area.  Interest rate lock commitments are residential mortgage loan commitments with customers, which guarantee a specified interest rate for a specified time period.  Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and are offset by the changes in the fair value of forward sales contracts.  Trustmark’s off-balance sheet obligations under these derivative instruments totaled $238.8 million at June 30, 2021, with a positive valuation adjustment of $3.9 million, compared to $329.3 million, with a positive valuation adjustment of $9.6 million, at December 31, 2020.

Trustmark offers certain derivatives products directly to qualified commercial lending clients seeking to manage their interest rate risk.  Trustmark economically hedges interest rate swap transactions executed with commercial lending clients by entering into offsetting interest rate swap transactions with institutional derivatives market participants.  Derivatives transactions executed as part of this program are not designated as qualifying hedging relationships and are, therefore, carried at fair value with the change in fair value recorded as noninterest income in bank card and other fees.  Because these derivatives have mirror-image contractual terms, in addition to collateral provisions which mitigate the impact of non-performance risk, the changes in fair value are expected to substantially offset.  The Chicago Mercantile Exchange rules legally characterize variation margin collateral payments made or received for centrally cleared interest rate swaps as settlements rather than collateral.  As a result, centrally cleared interest rate swaps included in other assets and other liabilities are presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.115 billion related to this program, compared to $1.125 billion at December 31, 2020.

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features

Trustmark has agreements with its financial institution counterparties that contain provisions where if Trustmark defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then Trustmark could also be declared in default on its derivatives obligations.

At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the termination value of interest rate swaps in a liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $950 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had posted collateral of $1.1 million against its obligations because of negotiated thresholds and minimum transfer amounts under these agreements.  If Trustmark had breached any of these triggering provisions at June 30, 2021, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value.

Credit risk participation agreements arise when Trustmark contracts with other financial institutions, as a guarantor or beneficiary, to share credit risk associated with certain interest rate swaps.  These agreements provide for reimbursement of losses resulting from a third-party default on the underlying swap.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had entered into six risk participation agreements as a beneficiary with an aggregate notional amount of $50.3 million compared to three risk participation agreements as a beneficiary with an aggregate notional amount of $41.1 million at December 31, 2020.  At both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Trustmark had entered into twenty-four risk participation agreements as a guarantor with an aggregate notional amount of $174.2 million and $172.0 million, respectively. The aggregate fair values of these risk participation agreements were immaterial at both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

55


 

Tabular Disclosures

The following tables disclose the fair value of derivative instruments in Trustmark’s consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 as well as the effect of these derivative instruments on Trustmark’s results of operations for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exchange traded purchased options included in other assets

 

$

496

 

 

$

145

 

OTC written options (rate locks) included in other assets

 

 

3,885

 

 

 

9,560

 

Futures contracts included in other assets

 

 

1,485

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps included in other assets (1)

 

 

26,168

 

 

 

37,974

 

Credit risk participation agreements included in other assets

 

 

138

 

 

 

89

 

Futures contracts included in other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

Forward contracts included in other liabilities

 

 

587

 

 

 

3,145

 

Exchange traded written options included in other liabilities

 

 

233

 

 

 

632

 

Interest rate swaps included in other liabilities (1)

 

 

2,569

 

 

 

1,313

 

Credit risk participation agreements included in other liabilities

 

 

143

 

 

 

200

 

 

(1)

In accordance with GAAP, the variation margin collateral payments made or received for interest rate swaps that are centrally cleared are legally characterized as settled. As a result, the centrally cleared interest rate swaps included in other assets and other liabilities are presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of gain (loss) recognized in mortgage banking, net

 

$

(1,614

)

 

$

12,395

 

 

$

(10,812

)

 

$

45,881

 

Amount of gain (loss) recognized in bank card and other fees

 

 

(667

)

 

 

(76

)

 

 

935

 

 

 

(1,736

)

 

Trustmark’s interest rate swap derivative instruments are subject to master netting agreements, and therefore, eligible for offsetting in the consolidated balance sheets.  Trustmark has elected to not offset any derivative instruments in its consolidated balance sheets.  Information about financial instruments that are eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 is presented in the following tables ($ in thousands):

 

Offsetting of Derivative Assets

 

 

As of June 30, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the

Statement of Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

Amounts of

Recognized

Assets

 

 

Gross Amounts

Offset in the

Statement of

Financial Position

 

 

Net Amounts of

Assets presented in

the Statement of

Financial Position

 

 

Financial

Instruments

 

 

Cash Collateral

Received

 

 

Net Amount

 

Derivatives

 

$

26,168

 

 

$

 

 

$

26,168

 

 

$

(14

)

 

$

 

 

$

26,154

 

 

Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities

 

 

As of June 30, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the

Statement of Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

Amounts of

Recognized

Liabilities

 

 

Gross Amounts

Offset in the

Statement of

Financial Position

 

 

Net Amounts of

Liabilities presented

in the Statement of

Financial Position

 

 

Financial

Instruments

 

 

Cash Collateral

Posted

 

 

Net Amount

 

Derivatives

 

$

2,569

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,569

 

 

$

(14

)

 

$

(1,100

)

 

$

1,455

 

56


 

 

 

Offsetting of Derivative Assets

 

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the

Statement of Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

Amounts of

Recognized

Assets

 

 

Gross Amounts

Offset in the

Statement of

Financial Position

 

 

Net Amounts of

Assets presented in

the Statement of

Financial Position

 

 

Financial

Instruments

 

 

Cash Collateral

Received

 

 

Net Amount

 

Derivatives

 

$

37,974

 

 

$

 

 

$

37,974

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

37,974

 

 

Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities

 

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the

Statement of Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

Amounts of

Recognized

Liabilities

 

 

Gross Amounts

Offset in the

Statement of

Financial Position

 

 

Net Amounts of

Liabilities presented

in the Statement of

Financial Position

 

 

Financial

Instruments

 

 

Cash Collateral

Posted

 

 

Net Amount

 

Derivatives

 

$

1,313

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,313

 

 

$

 

 

$

(1,313

)

 

$

 

 

 

Note 18 – Segment Information

 

Trustmark’s management reporting structure includes three segments: General Banking, Wealth Management and Insurance.  For a complete overview of Trustmark’s operating segments, see Note 21 – Segment Information included in Part II. Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report.

The accounting policies of each reportable segment are the same as those of Trustmark except for its internal allocations. Noninterest expenses for back-office operations support are allocated to segments based on estimated uses of those services. Trustmark measures the net interest income of its business segments with a process that assigns cost of funds or earnings credit on a matched-term basis.  This process, called “funds transfer pricing”, charges an appropriate cost of funds to assets held by a business unit, or credits the business unit for potential earnings for carrying liabilities.  The net of these charges and credits flows through to the General Banking Segment, which contains the management team responsible for determining TNB’s funding and interest rate risk strategies.

 

57


 

 

The following table discloses financial information by reportable segment for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

General Banking

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

118,169

 

 

$

103,376

 

 

$

219,277

 

 

$

205,779

 

Provision for credit losses (1)

 

 

540

 

 

 

24,430

 

 

 

(19,326

)

 

 

49,587

 

Noninterest income

 

 

35,167

 

 

 

50,051

 

 

 

74,819

 

 

 

95,227

 

Noninterest expense (1)

 

 

102,199

 

 

 

97,113

 

 

 

206,163

 

 

 

196,780

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

50,597

 

 

 

31,884

 

 

 

107,259

 

 

 

54,639

 

Income taxes

 

 

7,137

 

 

 

4,093

 

 

 

15,260

 

 

 

6,184

 

General banking net income

 

$

43,460

 

 

$

27,791

 

 

$

91,999

 

 

$

48,455

 

Selected Financial Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

16,716,574

 

 

$

15,378,653

 

 

$

16,716,574

 

 

$

15,378,653

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

11,046

 

 

$

10,422

 

 

$

21,910

 

 

$

19,216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wealth Management

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

1,256

 

 

$

1,576

 

 

$

2,487

 

 

$

3,080

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

2,204

 

Noninterest income

 

 

9,020

 

 

 

7,550

 

 

 

17,483

 

 

 

16,066

 

Noninterest expense

 

 

7,749

 

 

 

6,944

 

 

 

15,943

 

 

 

15,460

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

2,530

 

 

 

2,185

 

 

 

4,032

 

 

 

1,482

 

Income taxes

 

 

633

 

 

 

547

 

 

 

1,009

 

 

 

371

 

Wealth management net income

 

$

1,897

 

 

$

1,638

 

 

$

3,023

 

 

$

1,111

 

Selected Financial Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

299,275

 

 

$

232,467

 

 

$

299,275

 

 

$

232,467

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

66

 

 

$

67

 

 

$

134

 

 

$

134

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

(2

)

 

$

48

 

 

$

(5

)

 

$

93

 

Noninterest income

 

 

12,224

 

 

 

11,910

 

 

 

24,692

 

 

 

23,482

 

Noninterest expense

 

 

8,731

 

 

 

8,360

 

 

 

18,121

 

 

 

17,204

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

3,491

 

 

 

3,598

 

 

 

6,566

 

 

 

6,371

 

Income taxes

 

 

867

 

 

 

877

 

 

 

1,645

 

 

 

1,569

 

Insurance net income

 

$

2,624

 

 

$

2,721

 

 

$

4,921

 

 

$

4,802

 

Selected Financial Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

82,283

 

 

$

80,959

 

 

$

82,283

 

 

$

80,959

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

190

 

 

$

171

 

 

$

384

 

 

$

306

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

119,423

 

 

$

105,000

 

 

$

221,759

 

 

$

208,952

 

Provision for credit losses (1)

 

 

537

 

 

 

24,427

 

 

 

(19,331

)

 

 

51,791

 

Noninterest income

 

 

56,411

 

 

 

69,511

 

 

 

116,994

 

 

 

134,775

 

Noninterest expense (1)

 

 

118,679

 

 

 

112,417

 

 

 

240,227

 

 

 

229,444

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

56,618

 

 

 

37,667

 

 

 

117,857

 

 

 

62,492

 

Income taxes

 

 

8,637

 

 

 

5,517

 

 

 

17,914

 

 

 

8,124

 

Consolidated net income

 

$

47,981

 

 

$

32,150

 

 

$

99,943

 

 

$

54,368

 

Selected Financial Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

17,098,132

 

 

$

15,692,079

 

 

$

17,098,132

 

 

$

15,692,079

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

11,302

 

 

$

10,660

 

 

$

22,428

 

 

$

19,656

 

(1)

During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark reclassified its credit loss expense related to off-balance sheet credit exposures from noninterest expense to provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures. Prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

 

 

58


 

 

Note 19 – Accounting Policies Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

 

Accounting Policies Recently Adopted

Except for the changes detailed below, Trustmark has consistently applied its accounting policies to all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.”  Issued in December 2019, ASU 2019-12 seeks to simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in FASB ASC Topic 740.  In particular, the amendments of ASU 2019-12 remove the exceptions to (1) the incremental approach for intra-period tax allocation when there is a loss from continuing operations and income or a gain from other items (e.g., discontinued operations or other comprehensive income); (2) the requirement to recognize a deferred tax liability for equity method investments when a foreign subsidiary becomes an equity method investment; (3) the ability not to recognize a deferred tax liability for a foreign subsidiary when a foreign equity method investment becomes a subsidiary; and (4) the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year.  The amendments of ASU 2019-12 (1) require that an entity recognize a franchise tax (or similar tax), that is partially based on income, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 and account for any incremental amount incurred as a non-income-based tax; (2) require that an entity evaluate when a step up in the tax basis of goodwill should be considered part of the business combination in which the book goodwill was originally recognized and when it should instead be considered a separate transaction; (3) specify that an entity is not required to allocate the consolidated amount of current and deferred tax expense to a legal entity that is not subject to tax in its separate financial statements, but rather may elect to do so for a legal entity that is both not subject to tax and disregarded by the taxing authority; and (4) require that an entity reflect the effect of an enacted change in tax laws or rates in the annual effective tax rate computation in the interim period that includes the enactment date.  Trustmark adopted the amendments of ASU 2019-12 effective January 1, 2021.  Adoption of ASU 2019-12 did not have a material impact to Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2018-14, “Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.”  Issued in August 2018, ASU 2018-14 modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.  The amendments in ASU 2018-14 remove certain disclosure requirements that are no longer considered cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant.  Trustmark adopted the amendments of ASU 2018-14 effective January 1, 2021.  Trustmark will include the revised disclosures in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021.  Changes to the disclosures related to the defined benefit plans as a result of adopting ASU 2018-14 will not have a material impact to Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements.

Pending Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.”  Issued in March 2020, ASU 2020-04 seeks to provided additional guidance, for a limited time, to ease the potential burden in accounting for or recognizing the effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting.  The FASB issued ASU 2020-04 is response to concerns about the structural risks of interbank offered rates (IBORs) and, in particular, the risk that the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) will no longer be used.  Regulators have begun reference rate reform initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction-based and less susceptible to manipulation.  Stakeholders have raised operational challenges likely to arise with the reference rate reform, particularly related to contract modifications and hedge accounting.  The amendments of ASU 2020-04, which are elective and apply to all entities, provide expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships affected by the reference rate reform if certain criteria are met.  The amendments apply only to contracts and hedging relationships that reference LIBOR or another reference rate that is expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform.  The optional expedients for contract modifications should be applied consistently for all contracts or transactions within the relevant Codification Topic or Subtopic or Industry Subtopic that contains the related guidance.  The optional expedients for hedging relationships can be elected on an individual hedging relationship basis.  As the guidance in ASU 2020-04 is intended to assist entities during the global market-wide reference rate transition period, it is in effect for a limited time, from March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022.  Management is currently evaluating the impact to Trustmark as a result of the potential discontinuance of LIBOR, and a determination cannot be made at this time as to the impact the amendments of ASU 2020-04 or the reference rate reform will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

 

59


 

 

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following provides a narrative discussion and analysis of Trustmark Corporation’s (Trustmark) financial condition and results of operations.  This discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the supplemental financial data included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Description of Business

Trustmark, a Mississippi business corporation incorporated in 1968, is a bank holding company headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi.  Trustmark’s principal subsidiary is Trustmark National Bank (TNB), initially chartered by the State of Mississippi in 1889.  At June 30, 2021, TNB had total assets of $17.096 billion, which represented approximately 99.99% of the consolidated assets of Trustmark.

Through TNB and its other subsidiaries, Trustmark operates as a financial services organization providing banking and other financial solutions through 180 offices and 2,772 full-time equivalent associates (measured at June 30, 2021) located in the states of Alabama, Florida (primarily in the northwest or “Panhandle” region of that state, which is referred to herein as Trustmark’s Florida market), Mississippi, Tennessee (in the Memphis and Northern Mississippi regions, which are collectively referred to herein as Trustmark’s Tennessee market), and Texas (primarily in Houston, which is referred to herein as Trustmark’s Texas market).  Trustmark’s operations are managed along three operating segments: General Banking Segment, Wealth Management Segment and Insurance Segment.  For a complete overview of Trustmark’s business, see the section captioned “The Corporation” included in Part I. Item 1. – Business of Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (2020 Annual Report).

Executive Overview

Trustmark has been committed to meeting the banking and financial needs of its customers and communities for over 130 years, and remains focused on providing support, advice and solutions to meet its customers’ unique needs.  Trustmark’s financial performance during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 reflect solid growth in loans held for investment (LHFI) of $169.2 million, or 1.7%, and $328.3 million, or 3.3%, respectively, and deposits of $248.6 million, or 1.7%, and $583.3 million, or 4.2%, respectively.  Mortgage banking revenue remained strong during the first six months of 2021 following record setting levels in the prior year.  During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark sold $354.2 million of its outstanding Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, resulting in accelerated recognition of $18.6 million of unamortized PPP loan origination fees, net of cost, which is included in net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2021.  See the section captioned “Paycheck Protection Program” for additional information regarding the PPP loan sale.  Trustmark is committed to managing the franchise for the long term, supporting investments to promote profitable revenue growth, realigning delivery channels to support changing customer preferences as well as reengineering and efficiency opportunities to enhance long-term shareholder value.  Trustmark’s capital position remained solid, reflecting the consistent profitability of its diversified financial services businesses.  Trustmark’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.23 per share.  The dividend is payable September 15, 2021, to shareholders of record on September 1, 2021.

Recent Economic and Industry Developments

The COVID-19 pandemic and actions taken to mitigate the spread of it have had and may continue to have an adverse impact on economic activity globally, nationally and locally, including the geographical area in which Trustmark operates and industries in which Trustmark regularly extends credit.  For additional information regarding Trustmark’s exposure to industries impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, please see the section captioned “Exposure to COVID-19 Stressed Industries.”  Economic activity during the first six months of 2021 increased as certain restrictions were lifted following increased COVID-19 vaccination rates; however, restrictions remain in place for many areas and the long-term effectiveness of the vaccine and the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on economies and financial markets remains unknown.  

Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the financial markets and resulted in a number of actions by the FRB during 2020 and continuing in 2021.  Market interest rates declined to and remain at historical lows.  During 2020, the ten-year Treasury yield fell below 1.00% for the first time, and the FRB reduced the target federal funds rate to a range of 0.00% to 0.25% and announced a $700 billion quantitative easing program in response to the expected economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.  The FRB reduced the interest that it pays on excess reserves from 1.60% to 0.10% during the first quarter of 2020.  These rates have continued into the second quarter of 2021.  The prolonged reduction in interest rates has had and is expected to continue to have an adverse effect on net interest income and margins and profitability for financial institutions, including Trustmark.  

In the July 2021 “Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions by Federal Reserve District,” the twelve Federal Reserve Districts’ reports suggested that economic activity during the reporting period (covering the period from May 25, 2021

60


 

through July 2, 2021) strengthened further, displaying moderate to robust growth; however, changes in economic activities remained varied by sector.  Reports by the twelve Federal Reserve Districts (Districts) noted the following during the reporting period:

 

Sectors reporting above-average growth included transportation, travel and tourism, manufacturing and nonfinancial services.  Energy markets improved slightly, while agriculture had mixed results.  Supply chain disruptions, including shortages of materials, labor, delivery delays and low inventories of many consumer goods, became more widespread.  Strained car inventories resulted in somewhat lower car sales despite steady demand, and home sales rose slightly despite limited supply.  Non-auto retail sales grew at a moderate pace, and tourism was buoyed by the further abatement of pandemic-related concerns.

 

Residential construction softened in several Districts in response to rising costs, while commercial construction was mixed but slightly up.

 

Prices increased at an above-average pace.  Pricing pressures were broad-based and grew more acute in the hospitality sector, as the reopening of hotels and restaurants confronted limited supplies of materials and workers.  Construction costs remained high, but lumber prices eased a bit.  Pricing power was mixed across the Districts, as some contacts reported that high end-user demand enabled them to increase their prices and others said that input price pressures had reduced profit margins.  While some contacts felt that pricing pressures were transitory, the majority expected further increases in input costs and selling prices in the coming months.

 

The majority of Districts reported slight or modest job gains, while the remainder reported moderate to strong increases in employment.  Healthy labor demand was broad-based but was seen as strongest for low-skilled positions.  Wages increased at a moderate pace on average and low-wage workers enjoyed above-average pay increases.  Labor shortages were often cited as a reason firms could not staff at desired levels.  All Districts noted an increased use of non-wage cash incentives to attract and retain workers.  Firms in several Districts expected the difficulty finding workers to extend into the fall.

 

Banking contacts in most Districts reported lending activity increased slightly or modestly.

 

Outlooks for demand improved further, but many contacts expressed uncertainty or pessimism over the easing of supply constraints.

Reports by the Federal Reserve’s Sixth District, Atlanta (which includes Trustmark’s Alabama, Florida and Mississippi market regions), Eighth District, St. Louis (which includes Trustmark’s Tennessee market region), and Eleventh District, Dallas (which includes Trustmark’s Texas market region), noted similar findings for the reporting period as those discussed above.  The Federal Reserve’s Sixth District noted that banking conditions were steady, deposit balances grew and demand for consumer loans picked up. The Federal Reserve’s Eleventh District also reported that drilling and completion activity expanded moderately, oil field services firms noted difficulty hiring to support increased oil field activity, exploration and production firms slightly revised up their production outlook for this and next year due to strong year-to-date results and a higher oil price forecast for 2022, and sentiment in the oil and gas industry continued to improve; however, contacts remain cautious about tax policy changes and rising materials and labor costs.

It is unknown what the complete financial effect of the COVID-19 pandemic will be on Trustmark.  It is reasonably possible that estimates made in the financial statements, including the expected credit losses on loans and off-balance sheet credit exposures, could be materially and adversely impacted in the near term as a result of the adverse conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Exposure to COVID-19 Stressed Industries

The full impact of COVID-19 is unknown and continues to evolve rapidly. It has caused substantial disruption in international and the United States economies, markets and employment.  The pandemic has had and may continue to have a significant adverse impact on certain industries Trustmark serves.  The following provides a summary of Trustmark’s exposure to COVID-19 impacted industries within the LHFI portfolio as of June 30, 2021:

 

Restaurants: Aggregate outstanding balance of $104.0 million, credit exposure of $118.0 million, 297 total loans, represents 1.0% of Trustmark’s outstanding LHFI portfolio, 87% of the loans are real estate secured, 39% are full-service restaurants, 59% are limited-service restaurants and 2% are other.

 

Hotels: Aggregate outstanding balance of $365.0 million, credit exposure of $388.0 million, 90 total loans, represents 3.6% of Trustmark’s outstanding LHFI portfolio, 99% of the loans are real estate secured, consists of experienced operators and carry secondary guarantor support, 92% operate under a major hotel chain.

 

Retail (Commercial Real Estate): Aggregate outstanding balance of $437.0 million, credit exposure of $507.0 million, 295 total loans, represents 4.3% of Trustmark’s outstanding LHFI portfolio, 22% are stand-alone buildings with strong essential services tenants, 1% are national grocery store-anchored, 18% are investment grade anchored centers, mall exposure in only one borrower with $5 million outstanding.

61


 

 

Energy: Aggregate outstanding balance of $93.0 million, credit exposure of $301.0 million, 101 total loans, represents 0.9% of Trustmark’s outstanding LHFI portfolio, no loans where repayment or underlying security ties to realization of value from energy reserves.

 

Higher Risk Commercial and Industrial: Aggregate outstanding balance of $9.6 million, credit exposure of $13.7 million, one borrower.

During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark conducted an analysis of borrowers rated watch or worse that received a concession as well as other borrowers in industries significantly impacted by COVID-19 (e.g., restaurants and hotels) with $1.0 million or more in outstanding balances.  Collectively, the review included borrowers with $482.0 million in outstanding balances at June 30, 2021.  As a result of this review, $4.5 million was downgraded to a criticized category, none of which was in the COVID-19 impacted industries.  A total of $14.5 million was removed from a criticized category, which included borrowers in COVID-19 impacted industries.

COVID-19 Related Loan Concessions

On March 22, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an “Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus.”  This guidance encouraged financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers that may be unable to meet their contractual obligations because of the effects of COVID-19.  The guidance went on to explain that, in consultation with the FASB staff, the federal banking agencies concluded that short-term modifications (e.g., six months) made on a good faith basis to borrowers that were current as of the implementation date of a relief program were not TDRs.  On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act), a stimulus package intended to provide relief to businesses and consumers in the United States struggling as a result of the pandemic, was signed into law.  Section 4013 of the CARES Act also addressed COVID-19 related modifications and specified that COVID-19 related modifications on loans that were current as of December 31, 2019 were not TDRs.  On April 7, 2020, the federal banking agencies revised its earlier guidance to clarify the interaction between the March 22, 2020 interagency statement and section 4013 of the CARES Act, as well as the agencies’ views on consumer protection considerations.  The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, enacted on December 27, 2020, amended section 4013 of the CARES Act to provide an extension of the period in which TDR relief is available to financial institutions.  At June 30, 2021, the balance of loans remaining under some type of COVID-19 related concession totaled $19.0 million compared to $34.2 million at December 31, 2020.  Commercial concessions were primarily either interest only for 90 days or full payment deferrals for 90 days.  Consumer concessions were 90-day full payment deferrals.

Paycheck Protection Program

A provision in the CARES Act included initial funds for the creation of the PPP through the Small Business Administration (SBA) and Treasury Department.  The PPP is intended to provide loans to small businesses, sole proprietorships, independent contractors and self-employed individuals to pay their employees, rent, mortgage interest and utilities.  PPP loans are forgivable, in whole or in part, if the proceeds are used for payroll and other permitted purposes in accordance with the requirements of the PPP.  The loans are 100% guaranteed by the SBA.  The SBA and Treasury Department released a series of rules, guidance documents and processes governing the PPP, including a streamlined process for loan forgiveness of PPP loans of $150 thousand or less.  The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 extended some of the relief provisions in certain respects of the CARES Act, and appropriated additional funds to the PPP and permitted certain PPP borrowers to make “second draw” loans.  Subsequently, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, enacted on March 11, 2021, expanded the eligibility criteria for both first and second draw PPP loans and revised the exclusions from payroll costs for purposes of loan forgiveness.  The PPP Extension Act of 2021, enacted on March 30, 2021, extended the PPP through May 31, 2021.

From April to August 2020, Trustmark originated PPP loans for qualified small businesses and other borrowers.  Trustmark resumed submitting PPP applications to the SBA on behalf of qualified small businesses and other borrowers under the CARES Act, as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, in January 2021.  During the first six months of 2021, Trustmark originated 5,727 PPP loans totaling $376.2 million ($354.5 million net of $21.7 million of deferred fees and costs).  

On June 30, 2021, Trustmark announced the sale of approximately $354.2 million of its outstanding PPP loans, substantially all PPP loans originated in 2021, to The Loan Source, Inc. (Loan Source), a firm with significant expertise in PPP loans. As a result of this transaction, Loan Source will assume responsibility for the servicing and forgiveness process for the loans it has acquired from Trustmark. This transaction will allow Trustmark to focus on more traditional lending efforts and increase its ability to provide customers with financial services in an improving economic environment.  Trustmark accelerated the recognition of unamortized PPP loan origination fees, net of cost, of approximately $18.6 million, in the second quarter of 2021 due to the sale. This revenue is substantially the same as Trustmark would expect to recognize upon the maturity or forgiveness of the PPP loans being sold in this transaction, and thus this transaction serves to accelerate revenue anticipated in future periods and recognize it during the second quarter of 2021.

62


 

At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had 843 PPP loans outstanding totaling $168.2 million ($166.1 million net of $2.1 million of deferred fees and costs), compared to 7,398 PPP loans outstanding totaling $623.0 million ($610.1 million net of 12.9 million of deferred fees and costs) at December 31, 2020.  In addition to the loans sold, PPP loans totaling $476.9 million were forgiven by SBA during the first six months of 2021, compared to PPP loans totaling $346.9 million forgiven by the SBA during the fourth quarter of 2020.  

Due to the amount and nature of the PPP loans, these loans are not included in Trustmark’s LHFI portfolio and are presented separately in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.  Trustmark cannot predict the amount of PPP loans that will be forgiven in whole or in part by the SBA, nor can it predict the magnitude and timing of the impact the PPP loans and related fees will have on Trustmark’s net interest margin.  However, participation in the PPP will likely have a significant impact on Trustmark’s asset mix and net interest margin in 2021 as a result of the addition of these low interest rate loans and the related processing fees earned on these loans.

Financial Highlights

Trustmark reported net income of $48.0 million, or basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.76, in the second quarter of 2021, compared to $32.2 million, or basic and diluted EPS of $0.51, in the second quarter of 2020.  Trustmark’s reported performance during the quarter ended June 30, 2021 produced a return on average tangible equity of 13.96%, a return on average assets of 1.13%, an average equity to average assets ratio of 10.46% and a dividend payout ratio of 30.26%, compared to a return on average tangible equity of 10.32%, a return on average assets of 0.83%, an average equity to average assets ratio of 10.73% and a dividend payout ratio of 45.10% during the quarter ended June 30, 2020.

Trustmark reported net income of $99.9 million, or basic and diluted EPS of $1.58 and $1.57, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $54.4 million, or basic and diluted EPS of $0.86 and $0.85, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2020.  Trustmark’s reported performance during the first six months of 2021 produced a return on average tangible equity of 14.75%, a return on average assets of 1.20%, an average equity to average assets ratio of 10.50% and a dividend payout ratio of 29.11%, compared to a return on average tangible equity of 8.84%, a return on average assets of 0.75%, an average equity to average assets ratio of 11.33% and a dividend payout ratio of 53.49% for the first six months of 2020.

Total revenue, which is defined as net interest income plus noninterest income, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 was $175.8 million and $338.8 million, respectively, an increase of $1.3 million, or 0.8%, and a decrease of $5.0 million, or 1.4%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020.  The increase in total revenue for the second quarter of 2021 when compared to the same time period in 2020, resulted from an increase in net interest income, primarily due to the accelerated recognition of the unamortized loan fees on the PPP loans sold during the quarter ended June 30, 2021, largely offset by a decline in noninterest income, primarily due to a decline in mortgage banking, net.  The decrease in total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the same time period in 2020, resulted from a decline in noninterest income, primarily due to a decrease in mortgage banking, net, partially offset by an increase in net interest income, primarily due to an increase in interest and fees on PPP loans and a decline in interest on deposits, partially offset by declines in interest and fees on LHFI and LHFS and interest on securities.  These factors are discussed in further detail below.

Net interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $119.4 million and $221.8 million, respectively, an increase of $14.4 million, or 13.7%, and $12.8 million, or 6.1%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020.  Interest income totaled $125.9 million and $235.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, an increase of $11.3 million, or 9.8%, and $350 thousand, or 0.1%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020, principally due to the increase in interest and fees from PPP loans, partially offset by declines in interest and fees from LHFI and LHFS and interest on securities as a result of lower interest rates.  Interest expense totaled $6.5 million and $13.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, a decrease of $3.2 million, or 32.6%, and $12.5 million, or 47.7%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020, principally due to the decline in interest on deposits as a result of lower interest rates.

Noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $56.4 million, a decrease of $13.1 million, or 18.8%, when compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to a decline in mortgage banking, net, partially offset by increases in wealth management and service charges on deposit accounts.  Mortgage banking, net totaled $17.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, a decrease of $16.4 million, or 48.6%, when compared to the same time period in 2020, principally due to a decline in the gain on sales of loans, net partially offset by an increase in the net hedge ineffectiveness.  Wealth management income totaled $8.9 million for the second quarter of 2021, an increase of $1.4 million, or 18.2%, when compared to the second quarter of 2020, primarily due to increases in income from both investment services and trust management services.  Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $7.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, an increase of $1.2 million, or 19.0%, when compared to the same time period in 2020 principally due to an increase in the amount of non-sufficient funds (NSF) and overdraft occurrences on consumer demand deposit accounts (DDAs) and interest checking accounts and commercial DDAs, primarily as a result of an increase in customer transactions with the further abatement of pandemic-related concerns.

63


 

Noninterest income for the first six months of 2021 totaled $117.0 million, a decrease of $17.8 million, or 13.2%, when compared to the same time period in 2020.  The decrease in noninterest income when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to a decline in mortgage banking, net, partially offset by an increase in bank card and other fees.  Mortgage banking, net totaled $38.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, a decrease of $23.1 million, or 37.7%, when compared to the same time period in 2020, principally due to declines in the gain on sales of loans, net and the net hedge ineffectiveness and an increase in the run-off of the MSR.  Bank card and other fees totaled $17.8 million for the first six months of 2021, an increase of $4.7 million, or 36.0%, when compared to the same time period in 2020, principally due to increases in the credit valuation adjustment on customer derivatives and interchange income from point-of-sale transactions partially offset by a decline in interchange income from signature transactions.  

Noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $118.7 million, an increase of $6.3 million, or 5.6%, when compared to the same time period in 2020, principally due to increases in salaries and employee benefits, other real estate expense, net and services and fees.  Salaries and employee benefits totaled $70.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, an increase of $4.0 million, or 6.1%, when compared to the same time period in 2020.  The increase in salaries and employee benefits when the second quarter of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to increases in salaries expense, primarily resulting from general merit increases, accruals for annual general incentives and commission expense, primarily due to the increase in mortgage originations and production.  Other real estate expense, net totaled $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, an increase of $1.2 million when compared to the same time period in 2020, principally due to an increase in reserves for other real estate write-downs.  Services and fees totaled $21.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, an increase of $1.2 million, or 5.8%, when compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to increases in data processing charges related to software.

Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $240.2 million, an increase of $10.8 million, or 4.7%, when compared to the same time period in 2020, principally due to increases in salaries and employee benefits and services and fees.  Salaries and employee benefits totaled $141.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, an increase of $6.0 million, or 4.5%, when compared to the same time period in 2020.  The increase in salaries and employee benefits when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to increases in commissions expense resulting from improvements in mortgage originations and production, salary expense as a result of general merit increases, accruals for annual incentive compensation and incentive stock compensation, partially offset by non-routine expenses related to the voluntary early retirement program completed by Trustmark during the first quarter of 2020.  Trustmark incurred $4.3 million of non-routine salaries and employee benefits expense during the first quarter of 2020 related to this program.  Excluding these non-routine expenses, salaries and employee benefits increased $10.3 million, or 7.9%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020.  Services and fees totaled $44.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, an increase of $3.8 million, or 9.3%, when compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to increases in data processing charges related to software and outside services and fees related to independent contractors expenses.

Trustmark’s provision for credit losses on LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled a negative $4.0 million and a negative $14.5 million, respectively, a decrease of $22.2 million and $53.3 million, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020.  The provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $4.5 million and a negative $4.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, a decrease of $1.7 million and $17.9 million, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020.  The negative provision for credit losses on LHFI for the second quarter of 2021 primarily reflected a decline in required reserves as a result of risk rate upgrades due to improvements in credit quality, charge-down of an individually evaluated credit for which reserves were previously established and improvements in macroeconomic forecasts, partially offset by an increase in reserves as a result of the implementation of probability of default (PD) and loss-given default (LGD) floors at a portfolio level to ensure appropriate risk is reflected as macroeconomic conditions continue to improve.  The provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the second quarter of 2021 primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of an increase in off-balance sheet credit exposures and the implementation of the PD and LGD floors at a portfolio level.  The negative provision for credit losses on both LHFI and off-balance sheet credit exposures for the first six months of 2021 primarily reflected declines in required reserves as a result of improvements in the overall economy and macroeconomic factors used in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses (ACL).  Please see the section captioned “Provision for Credit Losses” for additional information regarding the provision for credit losses on LHFI and off-balance sheet credit exposures.

At June 30, 2021, nonperforming assets totaled $60.9 million, a decrease of $13.9 million, or 18.6%, compared to December 31, 2020, primarily due to a decline in nonaccrual LHFI.  Nonaccrual LHFI totaled $51.4 million at June 30, 2021, a decrease of $11.7 million, or 18.5%, relative to December 31, 2020, primarily due to the pay down and charge off of one large energy-related commercial credit as well as one large commercial credit which was returned to accrual status in Trustmark’s Mississippi market region.  Other real estate totaled $9.4 million at June 30, 2021, a decline of $2.2 million, or 19.0%, compared to December 31, 2020, principally due to an increase in reserves for other real estate write-downs in Trustmark’s Mississippi and Alabama market regions as well as properties sold in the Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee market regions.

64


 

LHFI totaled $10.153 billion at June 30, 2021, an increase of $328.3 million, or 3.3%, compared to December 31, 2020.  The increase in LHFI during the first six months of 2021 was primarily due to net growth in LHFI secured by real estate in Trustmark’s Mississippi, Texas, Alabama and Tennessee market regions and state and other political subdivision loans in the Mississippi, Texas, Alabama and Florida market regions, partially offset by declines in other commercial LHFI in the Mississippi, Alabama, Florida and Texas market regions.  For additional information regarding changes in LHFI and comparative balances by loan category, see the section captioned “LHFI.”

Management has continued its practice of maintaining excess funding capacity to provide Trustmark with adequate liquidity for its ongoing operations.  In this regard, Trustmark benefits from its strong deposit base, its highly liquid investment portfolio and its access to funding from a variety of external funding sources such as upstream federal funds lines, FHLB advances and, on a limited basis, brokered deposits.  See the section captioned “Liquidity” for further discussion of the components of Trustmark’s excess funding capacity.

Total deposits were $14.632 billion at June 30, 2021, an increase of $583.3 million, or 4.2%, compared to December 31, 2020, primarily reflecting deposits of proceeds from line draws, PPP loans and other COVID-19 related stimulus programs.  During the first six months of 2021, noninterest-bearing deposits increased $98.0 million, or 2.3%, principally due to growth in consumer and commercial noninterest-bearing DDAs.  Interest-bearing deposits increased $485.3 million, or 5.0%, during the first six months of 2021, primarily due to growth in all categories of interest checking and money market deposit accounts as well as consumer savings accounts, partially offset by declines in all categories of certificates of deposits.

Recent Legislative and Regulatory Developments

On March 5, 2021, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), confirmed that the publication of most LIBOR term rates will end on June 30, 2023 (excluding one-week U.S. LIBOR and two-month U.S. LIBOR, the publication of which will end on December 31, 2021).  Additionally, on April 6, 2021, New York Governor Cuomo signed into law legislation that provides for the substitution of an alternative reference rate, the Secured Overnight Funding Rate (SOFR), in any LIBOR-based contract governed by New York state law that does not include clear fallback language, once LIBOR is discontinued.  The FRB and other federal banking agencies have continued to encourage banks to transition away from LIBOR as soon as practicable. Given LIBOR’s extensive use across financial markets, the transition away from LIBOR presents various risks and challenges to financial markets and institutions, including Trustmark.  For additional information regarding the transition from LIBOR and Trustmark’s management of this transition, please see the respective risk factor included in Part I. Item 1A. – Risk Factors, of Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report.

For additional information regarding legislation and regulation applicable to Trustmark, see the section captioned “Supervision and Regulation” included in Part I. Item 1. – Business of Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report.

65


 

Selected Financial Data

The following tables present financial data derived from Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods presented ($ in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total interest income

 

$

125,925

 

 

$

114,653

 

 

$

235,397

 

 

$

235,047

 

Total interest expense

 

 

6,502

 

 

 

9,653

 

 

 

13,638

 

 

 

26,095

 

Net interest income

 

 

119,423

 

 

 

105,000

 

 

 

221,759

 

 

 

208,952

 

Provision for credit losses, LHFI

 

 

(3,991

)

 

 

18,185

 

 

 

(14,492

)

 

 

38,766

 

Provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet

   credit exposures (1)

 

 

4,528

 

 

 

6,242

 

 

 

(4,839

)

 

 

13,025

 

Noninterest income

 

 

56,411

 

 

 

69,511

 

 

 

116,994

 

 

 

134,775

 

Noninterest expense (1)

 

 

118,679

 

 

 

112,417

 

 

 

240,227

 

 

 

229,444

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

56,618

 

 

 

37,667

 

 

 

117,857

 

 

 

62,492

 

Income taxes

 

 

8,637

 

 

 

5,517

 

 

 

17,914

 

 

 

8,124

 

Net Income

 

$

47,981

 

 

$

32,150

 

 

$

99,943

 

 

$

54,368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenue (2)

 

$

175,834

 

 

$

174,511

 

 

$

338,753

 

 

$

343,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Share Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic EPS

 

$

0.76

 

 

$

0.51

 

 

$

1.58

 

 

$

0.86

 

Diluted EPS

 

 

0.76

 

 

 

0.51

 

 

 

1.57

 

 

 

0.85

 

Cash dividends per share

 

 

0.23

 

 

 

0.23

 

 

 

0.46

 

 

 

0.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Ratios

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average equity

 

 

10.81

%

 

 

7.76

%

 

 

11.39

%

 

 

6.61

%

Return on average tangible equity

 

 

13.96

%

 

 

10.32

%

 

 

14.75

%

 

 

8.84

%

Return on average assets

 

 

1.13

%

 

 

0.83

%

 

 

1.20

%

 

 

0.75

%

Average equity / average assets

 

 

10.46

%

 

 

10.73

%

 

 

10.50

%

 

 

11.33

%

Net interest margin (fully taxable equivalent)

 

 

3.16

%

 

 

3.12

%

 

 

2.99

%

 

 

3.31

%

Dividend payout ratio

 

 

30.26

%

 

 

45.10

%

 

 

29.11

%

 

 

53.49

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit Quality Ratios (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net charge-offs (recoveries) / average loans

 

 

0.05

%

 

 

-0.02

%

 

 

-0.02

%

 

 

0.05

%

Provision for credit losses / average loans

 

 

-0.16

%

 

 

0.74

%

 

 

-0.28

%

 

 

0.80

%

Nonaccrual LHFI / (LHFI + LHFS)

 

 

0.49

%

 

 

0.50

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperforming assets / (LHFI + LHFS)

   plus other real estate

 

 

0.58

%

 

 

0.68

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACL LHFI / LHFI

 

 

1.02

%

 

 

1.23

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark reclassified its credit loss expense related to off-balance sheet credit exposures from noninterest expense to provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures. Prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

(2)

Consistent with Trustmark’s audited annual financial statements, total revenue is defined as net interest income plus noninterest income.

(3)

Excludes PPP loans.

66


 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

17,098,132

 

 

$

15,692,079

 

Securities

 

 

2,981,751

 

 

 

2,544,201

 

Total loans (LHFI + LHFS)

 

 

10,485,001

 

 

 

10,014,895

 

Deposits

 

 

14,632,084

 

 

 

13,505,473

 

Total shareholders' equity

 

 

1,779,309

 

 

 

1,673,944

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market value - close

 

$

30.80

 

 

$

24.52

 

Book value

 

 

28.35

 

 

 

26.39

 

Tangible book value

 

 

22.13

 

 

 

20.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital Ratios

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity / total assets

 

 

10.41

%

 

 

10.67

%

Tangible equity / tangible assets

 

 

8.31

%

 

 

8.37

%

Tangible equity / risk-weighted assets

 

 

11.33

%

 

 

11.09

%

Tier 1 leverage ratio (1)

 

 

9.00

%

 

 

9.08

%

Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (1)

 

 

11.76

%

 

 

11.42

%

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (1)

 

 

12.25

%

 

 

11.94

%

Total risk-based capital ratio (1)

 

 

14.10

%

 

 

13.00

%

(1)

Trustmark elected the five-year phase-in transition period related to adopting FASB ASU 2016-13 for regulatory capital purposes.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to capital ratios defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and banking regulators, Trustmark utilizes various tangible common equity measures when evaluating capital utilization and adequacy.  Tangible common equity, as defined by Trustmark, represents common equity less goodwill and identifiable intangible assets.

Trustmark believes these measures are important because they reflect the level of capital available to withstand unexpected market conditions.  Additionally, presentation of these measures allows readers to compare certain aspects of Trustmark’s capitalization to other organizations.  These ratios differ from capital measures defined by banking regulators principally in that the numerator excludes shareholders’ equity associated with preferred securities, the nature and extent of which varies across organizations.  In Management’s experience, many stock analysts use tangible common equity measures in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method in accounting for mergers and acquisitions.

These calculations are intended to complement the capital ratios defined by GAAP and banking regulators.  Because GAAP does not include these capital ratio measures, Trustmark believes there are no comparable GAAP financial measures to these tangible common equity ratios.  Despite the importance of these measures to Trustmark, there are no standardized definitions for them and, as a result, Trustmark’s calculations may not be comparable with other organizations.  Also, there may be limits in the usefulness of these measures to investors.  As a result, Trustmark encourages readers to consider its consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure. 

67


 

The following table reconciles Trustmark’s calculation of these measures to amounts reported under GAAP for the periods presented ($ in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

TANGIBLE EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AVERAGE BALANCES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders' equity

 

 

$

1,780,705

 

 

$

1,665,716

 

 

$

1,770,087

 

 

$

1,652,893

 

Less:  Goodwill

 

 

 

(384,237

)

 

 

(383,081

)

 

 

(384,694

)

 

 

(381,876

)

Identifiable intangible assets

 

 

 

(6,442

)

 

 

(7,834

)

 

 

(6,778

)

 

 

(7,942

)

Total average tangible equity

 

 

$

1,390,026

 

 

$

1,274,801

 

 

$

1,378,615

 

 

$

1,263,075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERIOD END BALANCES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders' equity

 

 

$

1,779,309

 

 

$

1,673,944

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:  Goodwill

 

 

 

(384,237

)

 

 

(385,270

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identifiable intangible assets

 

 

 

(6,170

)

 

 

(8,895

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total tangible equity

(a)

 

$

1,388,902

 

 

$

1,279,779

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TANGIBLE ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

 

$

17,098,132

 

 

$

15,692,079

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:  Goodwill

 

 

 

(384,237

)

 

 

(385,270

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identifiable intangible assets

 

 

 

(6,170

)

 

 

(8,895

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total tangible assets

(b)

 

$

16,707,725

 

 

$

15,297,914

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-weighted assets

(c)

 

$

12,256,492

 

 

$

11,539,157

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME ADJUSTED FOR INTANGIBLE AMORTIZATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

$

47,981

 

 

$

32,150

 

 

$

99,943

 

 

$

54,368

 

Plus:  Intangible amortization net of tax

 

 

 

415

 

 

 

552

 

 

 

915

 

 

 

1,161

 

Net income adjusted for intangible amortization

 

 

$

48,396

 

 

$

32,702

 

 

$

100,858

 

 

$

55,529

 

Period end shares outstanding

(d)

 

 

62,773,226

 

 

 

63,422,439

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TANGIBLE EQUITY MEASUREMENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average tangible equity (1)

 

 

 

13.96

%

 

 

10.32

%

 

 

14.75

%

 

 

8.84

%

Tangible equity/tangible assets

(a)/(b)

 

 

8.31

%

 

 

8.37

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tangible equity/risk-weighted assets

(a)/(c)

 

 

11.33

%

 

 

11.09

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tangible book value

(a)/(d)*1,000

 

$

22.13

 

 

$

20.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMON EQUITY TIER 1 CAPITAL (CET1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders' equity

 

 

$

1,779,309

 

 

$

1,673,944

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CECL transitional adjustment (2)

 

 

 

26,671

 

 

 

32,693

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AOCI-related adjustments

 

 

 

10,641

 

 

 

(10,565

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CET1 adjustments and deductions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill net of associated deferred tax liabilities (DTLs)

 

 

 

(370,276

)

 

 

(371,342

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other adjustments and deductions for CET1 (3)

 

 

 

(5,243

)

 

 

(7,352

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CET1 capital

(e)

 

 

1,441,102

 

 

 

1,317,378

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional Tier 1 capital instruments plus related surplus

 

 

 

60,000

 

 

 

60,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 Capital

 

 

$

1,501,102

 

 

$

1,377,378

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio

(e)/(c)

 

 

11.76

%

 

 

11.42

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Calculated using annualized net income adjusted for intangible amortization divided by total average tangible equity.

(2)

Trustmark elected the five-year phase-in transition period related to adopting FASB ASU 2016-13 for regulatory capital purposes.

(3)

Includes other intangible assets, net of DTLs, disallowed deferred tax assets, threshold deductions and transition adjustments, as applicable.

Trustmark discloses certain non-GAAP financial measures, including net income adjusted for significant non-routine transactions, because Management uses these measures for business planning purposes, including to manage Trustmark’s business against internal projected results of operations and to measure Trustmark’s performance.  Trustmark views these as measures of its core operating business, which exclude the impact of the items detailed below, as these items are generally not operational in nature.  These non-GAAP financial measures also provide another basis for comparing period-to-period results as presented in the accompanying selected financial data table and the consolidated financial statements by excluding potential differences caused by non-operational and unusual or non-recurring items.  Readers are cautioned that these adjustments are not permitted under GAAP.  Trustmark encourages readers to consider its consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto in their entirety, and not to rely on any single financial measure.

68


 

The following table presents adjustments to net income and selected financial ratios as reported in accordance with GAAP resulting from significant non-routine items occurring during the periods presented ($ in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Diluted EPS

 

 

Amount

 

 

Diluted EPS

 

 

Amount

 

 

Diluted EPS

 

 

Amount

 

 

Diluted EPS

 

Net Income (GAAP)

 

$

47,981

 

 

$

0.76

 

 

$

32,150

 

 

$

0.51

 

 

$

99,943

 

 

$

1.57

 

 

$

54,368

 

 

$

0.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant non-routine transactions

   (net of taxes):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voluntary early retirement program

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,281

 

 

 

0.05

 

Net Income adjusted for significant

   non-routine transactions

   (Non-GAAP)

 

$

47,981

 

 

$

0.76

 

 

$

32,150

 

 

$

0.51

 

 

$

99,943

 

 

$

1.57

 

 

$

57,649

 

 

$

0.90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported (GAAP)

 

 

Adjusted

(Non-GAAP)

 

 

Reported (GAAP)

 

 

Adjusted

(Non-GAAP)

 

 

Reported (GAAP)

 

 

Adjusted

(Non-GAAP)

 

 

Reported (GAAP)

 

 

Adjusted

(Non-GAAP)

 

Return on average equity

 

 

10.81

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

7.76

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

11.39

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

6.61

%

 

 

7.00

%

Return on average tangible equity

 

 

13.96

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

10.32

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

14.75

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

8.84

%

 

 

9.35

%

Return on average assets

 

 

1.13

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

0.83

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

1.20

%

 

n/a

 

 

 

0.75

%

 

 

0.79

%

n/a – not applicable

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the principal component of Trustmark’s income stream and represents the difference, or spread, between interest and fee income generated from earning assets and the interest expense paid on deposits and borrowed funds.  Fluctuations in interest rates, as well as volume and mix changes in earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, can materially impact net interest income. The net interest margin is computed by dividing fully taxable equivalent (FTE) net interest income by average interest-earning assets and measures how effectively Trustmark utilizes its interest-earning assets in relationship to the interest cost of funding them.  The accompanying yield/rate analysis table shows the average balances for all assets and liabilities of Trustmark and the interest income or expense associated with earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.  The yields and rates have been computed based upon interest income and expense adjusted to a FTE basis using the federal statutory corporate tax rate in effect for each of the periods shown.  Loans on nonaccrual have been included in the average loan balances, and interest collected prior to these loans having been placed on nonaccrual has been included in interest income.  Loan fees included in interest associated with the average LHFI and LHFS balances were immaterial.

Net interest income-FTE for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 increased $14.4 million, or 13.3%, and $12.5 million, or 5.8%, respectively, when compared with the same time periods in 2020, principally due to the increase in interest and fees on PPP loans and the decline in interest on deposits, partially offset by declines in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI and taxable interest on securities.  The net interest margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 increased 4 basis points and decreased 32 basis points to 3.16% and 2.99%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020.  The net interest margin excluding PPP loans and the balance held at the FRB of Atlanta, which equals the reported net interest income-FTE excluding interest and fees on PPP and interest on the FRB balance, as a percentage of average earning assets excluding average PPP loans and the FRB balance, was 2.94% and 2.96% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, a decrease of 41 basis points and 48 basis points, respectively, when compared to 3.35% and 3.44% for the same time periods in 2020, respectively.  The decreases in the net interest margin excluding PPP loans and the balance held at the FRB of Atlanta for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same time periods in 2020, were principally due to declines in the yield on the LHFI and LHFS and securities portfolios, partially offset by lower costs of interest-bearing deposits.

At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had PPP loans outstanding totaling $166.1 million, net of deferred fees and costs of $2.1 million, compared to $939.8 million, net of $29.9 million of deferred fees and costs, at June 30, 2020.  Processing fees earned by TNB as the originating lender are being amortized over the life of the loans.  Payments on PPP loans are deferred until the date the SBA remits the borrower’s loan forgiveness amount to the lender (or, if the borrower does not apply for loan forgiveness, ten months after the end of the borrower’s loan forgiveness covered period).  During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark sold $354.2 million of its outstanding PPP loans, resulting in accelerated recognition of $18.6 million of unamortized PPP loan origination fees, net of cost, which is included in net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2021. In addition, PPP loans totaling $476.9 million were forgiven by

69


 

SBA during the first six months of 2021.  Average PPP loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $648.2 million and $623.3 million, respectively, a decrease of $116.2 million, or 15.2%, and an increase of $241.1 million, or 63.1%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020.  Interest and fees on PPP loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 increased $20.5 million and $29.8 million, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020.  The yield on PPP loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 increased to 15.81% and 11.26%, respectively, when compared 2.65% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2020.  Trustmark cannot predict the amount of PPP loans that will be forgiven in whole or in part by the SBA, nor can it predict the magnitude and timing of the impact the PPP loans and related fees will have on Trustmark’s net interest margin.  However, TNB’s participation in the PPP will likely have a significant impact on Trustmark’s asset mix and net interest margin for the remainder of 2021 as a result of the addition of these low interest rate loans and the related processing fees earned on these loans.

The average FRB balance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $1.700 billion and $1.659 billion, respectively, an increase of $876.6 million and $1.174 billion, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020. Interest earned on FRB balances increased $205 thousand and $35 thousand, respectively, when the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 is compared to the same time periods in 2020.  The yield on the FRB balance was 0.09% for both the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.  The yield on the FRB balance was 0.09% for the six months ended June 30, 2021, a decline of 22 basis points when compared to 0.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2020, reflecting the FRB’s reduction of the interest rate that it pays on excess reserves during the first quarter of 2020.

Average interest-earning assets for the three months ended June 30, 2021 were $15.512 billion compared to $13.942 billion for the same time period in 2020, an increase of $1.570 billion, or 11.3%, principally due to increases in average other earning assets of $895.7 million, average loans (LHFS and LHFI) of $407.8 million, or 4.1%, and average securities of $382.7 million, or 15.8%, partially offset by a decline in average PPP loans of $116.2 million, or 15.2%.  Average interest-earning assets for the first six months of 2021 were $15.356 billion compared to $13.085 billion for the same time period in 2020, an increase of $2.271 billion, or 17.4%.  The increase in average earning assets during the first six months of 2021 was primarily due to increases in average other earning assets of $1.188 billion, average loans (LHFS and LHFI) of $523.0 million, or 5.3%, average securities of $318.7 million, or 13.3%, and average PPP loans of $241.1 million, or 63.1%.  The increase in average other earning assets when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, was primarily due to an increase in excess reserves held at the FRB as a result of the increase in customer deposit account balances.  The increase in average loans (LHFS and LHFI) was primarily attributable to the $493.1 million, or 5.1%, increase in the LHFI portfolio when balances at June 30, 2021 are compared to balances at June 30, 2020.  This increase was principally due to net growth in loans secured by real estate and state and other political subdivision loans, partially offset by net declines in other commercial loans and commercial and industrial loans.  The increase in average securities when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020 was primarily due to purchase of securities available for sale, partially offset by calls, maturities and pay-downs of the underlying loans of government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) guaranteed securities.

Interest income-FTE for the three months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $128.9 million, an increase of $11.2 million, or 9.5%, while the yield on total earning assets declined 6 basis points to 3.33% when compared to the same time period in 2020.  The increase in interest income-FTE for the second quarter of 2021 was primarily due to the increase in interest and fees on PPP loans partially offset by declines in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI-FTE and interest on securities-taxable.  During the first six months of 2021, interest income-FTE totaled $241.2 million, an increase of $86 thousand, while the yield on total earning assets declined 54 basis points to 3.17% when compared to the first six months of 2020.  The slight increase in interest income-FTE for the first six months of 2021 was primarily due to the increase in interest and fees on PPP loans, which were mostly offset by declines in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI-FTE and interest on securities-taxable.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI-FTE declined $5.6 million, or 5.6%, and $21.6 million, or 10.3%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020, while the yield on loans (LHFS and LHFI) decreased 39 basis points to 3.64% and 62 basis points to 3.66%, respectively, as a result of lower interest rates.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, interest on securities-taxable decreased $3.8 million, or 29.5%, and $7.8 million, or 30.3%, respectively, while the yield on securities-taxable declined 86 basis points to 1.30% and 85 basis points to 1.35%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020, primarily due to the run off of maturing investment securities and lower interest rates on securities available for sale purchased.  

Average interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $10.478 billion compared to $9.867 billion for the same time period in 2020, and increase of $610.8 million, or 6.2%.  Average interest-bearing liabilities for the first six months of 2021 totaled $10.386 billion compared to $9.355 billion for the same time period in 2020, an increase of $1.031 billion, or 11.0%.  The increase in average interest-bearing liabilities was primarily the result of the increase in average interest-bearing deposits and the addition of the subordinated debt during the fourth quarter of 2020.  Average interest-bearing deposits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 increased $394.3 million, or 4.1%, and $860.8 million, or 9.5%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020, primarily due to growth in average savings deposits and interest-bearing demand deposits as customers deposited proceeds from line draws, PPP loans and other COVID-19 related stimulus programs.  

70


 

Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $6.5 million and $13.6 million, respectively, a decrease of $3.2 million, or 32.6%, and $12.5 million, or 47.7%, respectively, when compared with the same time periods in 2020, while the rate on total interest-bearing liabilities decreased 14 basis points to 0.25% and 30 basis points to 0.26%, respectively, primarily due to a decline in interest on deposits.  Interest on deposits decreased $4.1 million, or 47.0%, and $13.8 million, or 58.4%, respectively, while the rate on interest-bearing deposits decreased 18 basis points to 0.19% and 33 basis points to 0.20%, respectively, when the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 are compared to the same time periods in 2020, primarily due to lower interest rates.

The following table provides the tax equivalent basis yield or rate for each component of the tax equivalent net interest margin for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

Balance

 

 

Interest

 

 

Yield/

Rate

 

 

Average

Balance

 

 

Interest

 

 

Yield/

Rate

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under

   reverse repurchase agreements

 

$

55

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

113

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

Securities - taxable

 

 

2,781,350

 

 

 

8,991

 

 

 

1.30

%

 

 

2,379,405

 

 

 

12,762

 

 

 

2.16

%

Securities - nontaxable

 

 

16,132

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

3.70

%

 

 

35,365

 

 

 

315

 

 

 

3.58

%

PPP Loans

 

 

648,222

 

 

 

25,555

 

 

 

15.81

%

 

 

764,416

 

 

 

5,044

 

 

 

2.65

%

Loans (LHFS and LHFI)

 

 

10,315,927

 

 

 

93,698

 

 

 

3.64

%

 

 

9,908,132

 

 

 

99,300

 

 

 

4.03

%

Other earning assets

 

 

1,750,385

 

 

 

489

 

 

 

0.11

%

 

 

854,642

 

 

 

239

 

 

 

0.11

%

Total interest-earning assets

 

 

15,512,071

 

 

 

128,882

 

 

 

3.33

%

 

 

13,942,073

 

 

 

117,660

 

 

 

3.39

%

Other assets

 

 

1,622,388

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,685,317

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for credit losses, LHFI

 

 

(112,346

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(103,006

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

17,022,113

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

15,524,384

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

$

9,985,986

 

 

 

4,630

 

 

 

0.19

%

 

$

9,591,649

 

 

 

8,730

 

 

 

0.37

%

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under

   repurchase agreements

 

 

174,620

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

0.14

%

 

 

105,696

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

0.16

%

Other borrowings

 

 

316,952

 

 

 

1,813

 

 

 

2.29

%

 

 

169,389

 

 

 

881

 

 

 

2.09

%

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

10,477,558

 

 

 

6,502

 

 

 

0.25

%

 

 

9,866,734

 

 

 

9,653

 

 

 

0.39

%

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

 

 

4,512,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,645,761

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

251,582

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

346,173

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity

 

 

1,780,705

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,665,716

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

$

17,022,113

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

15,524,384

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Margin

 

 

 

 

 

 

122,380

 

 

 

3.16

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

108,007

 

 

 

3.12

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less tax equivalent adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,957

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Margin per Consolidated

   Statements of Income

 

 

 

 

 

$

119,423

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

105,000

 

 

 

 

 

71


 

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Average

Balance

 

 

Interest

 

 

Yield/

Rate

 

 

Average

Balance

 

 

Interest

 

 

Yield/

Rate

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under

   reverse repurchase agreements

 

$

95

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

139

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

Securities - taxable

 

 

2,684,886

 

 

 

17,929

 

 

 

1.35

%

 

 

2,347,284

 

 

 

25,710

 

 

 

2.20

%

Securities - nontaxable

 

 

22,660

 

 

 

439

 

 

 

3.91

%

 

 

41,548

 

 

 

772

 

 

 

3.74

%

PPP Loans

 

 

623,319

 

 

 

34,796

 

 

 

11.26

%

 

 

382,208

 

 

 

5,044

 

 

 

2.65

%

Loans (LHFS and LHFI)

 

 

10,316,122

 

 

 

187,092

 

 

 

3.66

%

 

 

9,793,153

 

 

 

208,657

 

 

 

4.28

%

Other earning assets

 

 

1,709,373

 

 

 

992

 

 

 

0.12

%

 

 

520,985

 

 

 

979

 

 

 

0.38

%

Total interest-earning assets

 

 

15,356,455

 

 

 

241,248

 

 

 

3.17

%

 

 

13,085,317

 

 

 

241,162

 

 

 

3.71

%

Other assets

 

 

1,611,877

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,592,019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for credit losses, LHFI

 

 

(115,932

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(94,011

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

16,852,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

14,583,325

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

$

9,880,836

 

 

 

9,853

 

 

 

0.20

%

 

$

9,020,013

 

 

 

23,687

 

 

 

0.53

%

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under

   repurchase agreements

 

 

170,786

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

0.14

%

 

 

176,605

 

 

 

667

 

 

 

0.76

%

Other borrowings

 

 

334,209

 

 

 

3,670

 

 

 

2.21

%

 

 

158,262

 

 

 

1,741

 

 

 

2.21

%

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

10,385,831

 

 

 

13,638

 

 

 

0.26

%

 

 

9,354,880

 

 

 

26,095

 

 

 

0.56

%

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

 

 

4,438,324

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,278,356

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

258,158

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

297,196

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity

 

 

1,770,087

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,652,893

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

$

16,852,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

14,583,325

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Margin

 

 

 

 

 

 

227,610

 

 

 

2.99

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

215,067

 

 

 

3.31

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less tax equivalent adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,115

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Margin per Consolidated

   Statements of Income

 

 

 

 

 

$

221,759

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

208,952

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses, LHFI is the amount necessary to maintain the ACL for LHFI at the amount of expected credit losses inherent within the LHFI portfolio.  The amount of provision for credit losses and the related ACL for LHFI are based on Trustmark’s ACL methodology.  The provision for credit losses, LHFI totaled a negative $4.0 million and a negative $14.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to a provision for credit losses, LHFI of $18.2 million and $38.8 million, respectively, for the same time periods in 2020. The negative provision for credit losses on LHFI for the second quarter of 2021 primarily reflected a decline in required reserves as a result of risk rate upgrades due to improvements in credit quality, charge-down of an individually evaluated credit for which reserves were previously established and improvements in macroeconomic forecasts, partially offset by an increase in reserves as a result of the implementation of PD and LGD floors at a portfolio level to ensure appropriate risk is reflected as macroeconomic conditions continue to improve.  The negative provision for credit losses for the first six months of 2021 primarily reflected declines in required reserves as a result of improvements in the macroeconomic forecast used in the calculation of the ACL. See the section captioned “Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI” for information regarding Trustmark’s ACL methodology as well as further analysis of the provision for credit losses.

FASB ASC Topic 326 requires Trustmark to estimate expected credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures which are not unconditionally cancellable by Trustmark.  Trustmark maintains a separate ACL for off-balance sheet credit exposures, including unfunded commitments and letters of credit.  Adjustments to the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures are recorded to provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures.  The provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $4.5

72


 

million and a negative $4.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $6.2 million and $13.0 million for the same time periods in 2020, respectively.  The provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the second quarter of 2021 primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of an increase in off-balance sheet credit exposures and the implementation of the PD and LGD floors at a portfolio level.  The negative provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures for the first six months of 2021 primarily reflected declines in required reserves as a result of improvements in the overall economy and macroeconomic factors used in the calculation of the ACL.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income represented 32.1% and 34.5% of total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to 39.8% and 39.2% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020.  The following table provides the comparative components of noninterest income for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

$

7,613

 

 

$

6,397

 

 

$

1,216

 

 

 

19.0

%

 

$

14,969

 

 

$

16,429

 

 

$

(1,460

)

 

 

-8.9

%

Bank card and other fees

 

 

8,301

 

 

 

7,717

 

 

 

584

 

 

 

7.6

%

 

 

17,773

 

 

 

13,072

 

 

 

4,701

 

 

 

36.0

%

Mortgage banking, net

 

 

17,333

 

 

 

33,745

 

 

 

(16,412

)

 

 

-48.6

%

 

 

38,137

 

 

 

61,228

 

 

 

(23,091

)

 

 

-37.7

%

Insurance commissions

 

 

12,217

 

 

 

11,868

 

 

 

349

 

 

 

2.9

%

 

 

24,662

 

 

 

23,418

 

 

 

1,244

 

 

 

5.3

%

Wealth management

 

 

8,946

 

 

 

7,571

 

 

 

1,375

 

 

 

18.2

%

 

 

17,362

 

 

 

16,108

 

 

 

1,254

 

 

 

7.8

%

Other, net

 

 

2,001

 

 

 

2,213

 

 

 

(212

)

 

 

-9.6

%

 

 

4,091

 

 

 

4,520

 

 

 

(429

)

 

 

-9.5

%

Total noninterest income

 

$

56,411

 

 

$

69,511

 

 

$

(13,100

)

 

 

-18.8

%

 

$

116,994

 

 

$

134,775

 

 

$

(17,781

)

 

 

-13.2

%

Changes in various components of noninterest income are discussed in further detail below.  For analysis of Trustmark’s insurance commissions and wealth management income, please see the section captioned “Results of Segment Operations.”

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts

The increase in service charges on deposit accounts for the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to an increase in the amount of NSF and overdraft occurrences on consumer DDAs and interest checking accounts and commercial DDAs, primarily as a result of an increase in customer transactions with the further abatement of pandemic-related concerns.  The decrease in service charges on deposit accounts for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to a decline in the amount of NSF and overdraft occurrences on DDAs primarily as a result of higher average customer account balances resulting from the various COVID-19 related stimulus programs.

Bank Card and Other Fees

The increase in bank card and other fees for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to increases in credit valuation adjustment on customer derivatives and interchange income from point-of-sale transactions partially offset by a decline in interchange income from signature transactions.

73


 

Mortgage Banking, Net

The following table illustrates the components of mortgage banking, net included in noninterest income for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

Mortgage servicing income, net

 

$

6,318

 

 

$

5,893

 

 

$

425

 

 

 

7.2

%

 

$

12,499

 

 

$

11,712

 

 

$

787

 

 

 

6.7

%

Change in fair value-MSR from

   runoff

 

 

(5,029

)

 

 

(4,214

)

 

 

(815

)

 

 

-19.3

%

 

 

(10,132

)

 

 

(6,821

)

 

 

(3,311

)

 

 

-48.5

%

Gain on sales of loans, net

 

 

14,778

 

 

 

34,078

 

 

 

(19,300

)

 

 

-56.6

%

 

 

34,234

 

 

 

48,417

 

 

 

(14,183

)

 

 

-29.3

%

Mortgage banking income

   before net hedge

   ineffectiveness

 

 

16,067

 

 

 

35,757

 

 

 

(19,690

)

 

 

-55.1

%

 

 

36,601

 

 

 

53,308

 

 

 

(16,707

)

 

 

-31.3

%

Change in fair value-MSR from

   market changes

 

 

(4,465

)

 

 

(3,159

)

 

 

(1,306

)

 

 

-41.3

%

 

 

9,231

 

 

 

(27,158

)

 

 

36,389

 

 

n/m

 

Change in fair value of derivatives

 

 

5,731

 

 

 

1,147

 

 

 

4,584

 

 

n/m

 

 

 

(7,695

)

 

 

35,078

 

 

 

(42,773

)

 

n/m

 

Net hedge ineffectiveness

 

 

1,266

 

 

 

(2,012

)

 

 

3,278

 

 

n/m

 

 

 

1,536

 

 

 

7,920

 

 

 

(6,384

)

 

 

-80.6

%

Mortgage banking, net

 

$

17,333

 

 

$

33,745

 

 

$

(16,412

)

 

 

-48.6

%

 

$

38,137

 

 

$

61,228

 

 

$

(23,091

)

 

 

-37.7

%

n/m - percentage changes greater than +/- 100% are not considered meaningful

The decrease in mortgage banking, net for the three months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to a decline in the gain on sales of loans, net partially offset by an increase in the net hedge ineffectiveness.  The decrease in mortgage banking, net for the first six months of 2021 when compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to declines in the gain on sales of loans, net and the net hedge ineffectiveness and an increase in the run-off of the MSR.  The decline in the positive hedge ineffectiveness for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same time period in 2020 was primarily due to reduced spreads between mortgage and ten-year Treasury rates.  Mortgage loan production for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 was $736.8 million and $1.503 billion, respectively, a decrease of $116.5 million, or 13.7%, and an increase of $192.9 million, or 14.7%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2020.  Loans serviced for others totaled $7.853 billion at June 30, 2021, compared with $7.393 billion at June 30, 2020, an increase of $460.5 million, or 6.2%.

Representing a significant component of mortgage banking income is the gain on sales of loans, net.  The decrease in the gain on sales of loans, net when the three months ended June 30, 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, was primarily the result of a decline in the mortgage valuation adjustment as well as decrease in the volume of loans sold.  The decrease in the gain on sales of loans, net when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, was principally due to a decline in the mortgage valuation adjustment partially offset by higher profit margins in secondary marketing activities and an increase in the volume of loans sold.  Loan sales totaled $629.8 million and $1.289 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, a decrease of $156.0 million, or 19.9%, and an increase of $186.2 million, or 16.9%, respectively, when compared with the same time periods in 2020.

Other Income, Net

The following table illustrates the components of other income, net included in noninterest income for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

Partnership amortization for tax credit

   purposes

 

$

(1,989

)

 

$

(1,205

)

 

$

(784

)

 

 

-65.1

%

 

$

(3,511

)

 

$

(2,366

)

 

$

(1,145

)

 

 

-48.4

%

Increase in life insurance cash

   surrender value

 

 

1,653

 

 

 

1,696

 

 

 

(43

)

 

 

-2.5

%

 

 

3,292

 

 

 

3,418

 

 

 

(126

)

 

 

-3.7

%

Other miscellaneous income

 

 

2,337

 

 

 

1,722

 

 

 

615

 

 

 

35.7

%

 

 

4,310

 

 

 

3,468

 

 

 

842

 

 

 

24.3

%

Total other, net

 

$

2,001

 

 

$

2,213

 

 

$

(212

)

 

 

-9.6

%

 

$

4,091

 

 

$

4,520

 

 

$

(429

)

 

 

-9.5

%

74


 

 

Noninterest Expense

The following table illustrates the comparative components of noninterest expense for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

$

70,115

 

 

$

66,107

 

 

$

4,008

 

 

 

6.1

%

 

$

141,277

 

 

$

135,255

 

 

$

6,022

 

 

 

4.5

%

Services and fees

 

 

21,769

 

 

 

20,567

 

 

 

1,202

 

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

44,253

 

 

 

40,497

 

 

 

3,756

 

 

 

9.3

%

Net occupancy-premises

 

 

6,578

 

 

 

6,587

 

 

 

(9

)

 

 

-0.1

%

 

 

13,373

 

 

 

12,873

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

3.9

%

Equipment expense

 

 

5,567

 

 

 

5,620

 

 

 

(53

)

 

 

-0.9

%

 

 

11,811

 

 

 

11,236

 

 

 

575

 

 

 

5.1

%

Other real estate expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write-downs

 

 

1,295

 

 

 

(153

)

 

 

1,448

 

 

n/m

 

 

 

1,445

 

 

 

844

 

 

 

601

 

 

 

71.2

%

Net (gain) loss on sale

 

 

41

 

 

 

185

 

 

 

(144

)

 

 

-77.8

%

 

 

(18

)

 

 

255

 

 

 

(273

)

 

n/m

 

Carrying costs

 

 

175

 

 

 

239

 

 

 

(64

)

 

 

-26.8

%

 

 

408

 

 

 

466

 

 

 

(58

)

 

 

-12.4

%

Total other real estate expense, net

 

 

1,511

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

1,240

 

 

n/m

 

 

 

1,835

 

 

 

1,565

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

17.3

%

Other expense

 

 

13,139

 

 

 

13,265

 

 

 

(126

)

 

 

-0.9

%

 

 

27,678

 

 

 

28,018

 

 

 

(340

)

 

 

-1.2

%

Total noninterest expense (1)

 

$

118,679

 

 

$

112,417

 

 

$

6,262

 

 

 

5.6

%

 

$

240,227

 

 

$

229,444

 

 

$

10,783

 

 

 

4.7

%

n/m - percentage changes greater than +/- 100% are not considered meaningful

(1)

During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark reclassified its credit loss expense related to off-balance sheet credit exposures from noninterest expense to provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures. Prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

Changes in the various components of noninterest expense are discussed in further detail below.  Management considers disciplined expense management a key area of focus in the support of improving shareholder value.

Salaries and Employee Benefits

The increase in salaries and employee benefits when the second quarter of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to increases in salaries expense, primarily resulting from general merit increases, accrual for annual general incentives and commission expense, primarily due to the increase in mortgage originations and production.  The increase in salaries and employee benefits when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to increases in commissions expense resulting from improvements in mortgage originations and production, salary expense as a result of general merit increases, accruals for annual incentive compensation and incentive stock compensation, partially offset by non-routine expenses related to the voluntary early retirement program completed by Trustmark during the first quarter of 2020.

During the first quarter of 2020, Trustmark completed a voluntary early retirement program and incurred $4.3 million of non-routine salaries and employee benefits expense related to this program.  Excluding these non-routine expenses, salaries and employee benefits increased $10.3 million, or 7.9%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020.

Services and Fees

The increase in services and fees when the three months ended June 30, 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, was primarily due to increases in data processing charges related to software.  The increase in services and fees when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020 was primarily due to increases in data processing charges related to software and outside services and fees related to independent contractors expenses.

Other Real Estate Expense, Net

The increase in other real estate expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same time period in 2020 was principally due to an increase in reserves for other real estate write-downs.  

75


 

Other Expense

The following table illustrates the comparative components of other noninterest expense for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

$ Change

 

 

% Change

 

Loan expense (1)

 

$

3,738

 

 

$

3,619

 

 

$

119

 

 

 

3.3

%

 

$

7,905

 

 

$

6,751

 

 

$

1,154

 

 

 

17.1

%

Amortization of intangibles

 

 

553

 

 

 

736

 

 

 

(183

)

 

 

-24.9

%

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

1,548

 

 

 

(329

)

 

 

-21.3

%

FDIC assessment expense

 

 

1,225

 

 

 

1,590

 

 

 

(365

)

 

 

-23.0

%

 

 

2,765

 

 

 

3,180

 

 

 

(415

)

 

 

-13.1

%

Other miscellaneous expense (1)

 

 

7,623

 

 

 

7,320

 

 

 

303

 

 

 

4.1

%

 

 

15,789

 

 

 

16,539

 

 

 

(750

)

 

 

-4.5

%

Total other expense

 

$

13,139

 

 

$

13,265

 

 

$

(126

)

 

 

-0.9

%

 

$

27,678

 

 

$

28,018

 

 

$

(340

)

 

 

-1.2

%

(1)

During the second quarter of 2021, Trustmark reclassified certain expenses related to mortgage loan appraisals from other miscellaneous expense to loan expense.  Prior period amounts have been reclassified accordingly.

Results of Segment Operations

For a description of the methodologies used to measure financial performance and financial information by reportable segment, please see Note 18 – Segment Information included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.  The following discusses changes in the results of operations of each reportable segment for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.

General Banking

Net interest income for the General Banking Segment increased $13.5 million, or 6.6%, when the six months ended June 30, 2021 is compared with the same time period in 2020.  The increase in net interest income was principally due to the increase in interest and fees on PPP loans as a result of the $18.6 million of loan fees recognized on the sale of the PPP loans during the second quarter of 2021 and a decrease in interest on deposits, partially offset by decreases in interest and fees on LHFI and LHFS and interest on securities, primarily due to declines in interest rates in general.  The provision for credit losses, net (LHFI and off-balance sheet credit exposures) for the six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled a negative $19.3 million compared to a provision for credit losses, net of $49.6 million for the same period in 2020, a decrease of $68.9 million primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic forecast used in the calculation of the ACL.  For more information on these net interest income items, please see the sections captioned “Financial Highlights” and “Results of Operations.”

Noninterest income for the General Banking Segment decreased $20.4 million, or 21.4%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to the declines in mortgage banking, net, and service charges on deposit accounts partially offset by an increase in bank card and other fees.  Noninterest income for the General Banking Segment represented 25.4% of total revenue for this segment for the first six months of 2021 compared to 31.6% for the same time period in 2020.  Noninterest income for the General Banking Segment includes service charges on deposit accounts; bank card and other fees; mortgage banking, net; other income, net and securities gains (losses), net.  For more information on these noninterest income items, please see the analysis included in the section captioned “Noninterest Income.”

Noninterest expense for the General Banking Segment increased $9.4 million, or 4.8%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared with the same time period in 2020, principally due to increases in salaries and employee benefits and data processing charges related to software.  For more information on these noninterest expense items, please see the analysis included in the section captioned “Noninterest Expense.”

Wealth Management

Net income for the Wealth Management Segment for the first six months of 2021 increased $1.9 million when compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to a decrease in the provision for credit losses, net and an increase in noninterest income.  Net interest income for the Wealth Management Segment declined $593 thousand, or 19.3%, when the first six months of 2021 are compared to the same time period in 2020, principally due to a decline in interest and fees on loans and an increase in interest on deposits generated by the Private Banking Department.  The provision for credit losses, net for the six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled a negative $5 thousand compared to a provision for credit losses, net of $2.2 million for the same period in 2020, a decrease of $2.2 million primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic forecast used in the calculation of the ACL.  Noninterest income for the Wealth Management Segment, which primarily includes income related to investment management, trust and brokerage services, increased $1.4 million, or 8.8%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to increases in income from trust management and brokerage services.  Noninterest expense for the Wealth Management Segment

76


 

increased $483 thousand, or 3.1%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, principally due to increases in salary and employee benefit expense partially offset by declines in other miscellaneous expenses.

At June 30, 2021 and 2020, Trustmark held assets under management and administration of $15.355 billion and $13.755 billion, respectively, and brokerage assets of $2.315 billion and $1.945 billion, respectively.

Insurance

Net income for the Insurance Segment for the first six months of 2021 increased $119 thousand, or 2.5%, when compared to the same time period in 2020.  Noninterest income for the Insurance Segment, which is predominately composed of insurance commissions, increased $1.2 million, or 5.2%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to new business commission volume in the property and casualty business and increases in other commission income.  Noninterest expense for the Insurance Segment increased $917 thousand, or 5.3%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to increases in outside services and fees related to independent contractor expenses and salary expense resulting from modest general merit increases and associates added as a result of agencies acquired during 2020, partially offset by a decline in commission expense.

Income Taxes

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, Trustmark’s combined effective tax rate was 15.3% and 15.2%, respectively, compared to 14.6% and 13.0%, respectively, for the same time periods in 2020.  The increase in the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same time periods in 2020 was principally due to an increase in the amount of forecasted net income for the respective years.  Trustmark’s effective tax rate continues to be less than the statutory rate primarily due to various tax-exempt income items and its utilization of income tax credit programs.  Trustmark invests in partnerships that provide income tax credits on a Federal and/or State basis (i.e., new market tax credits, low income housing tax credits or historical tax credits).  The income tax credits related to these partnerships are utilized as specifically allowed by income tax law and are recorded as a reduction in income tax expense.

Financial Condition

Earning assets serve as the primary revenue streams for Trustmark and are comprised of securities, loans, federal funds sold and other earning assets.  Average earning assets totaled $15.356 billion, or 91.1% of total average assets, for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $13.085 billion, or 89.7% of total average assets, for the six months ended June 30, 2020, an increase of $2.271 billion, or 17.4%.

Securities

The securities portfolio is utilized by Management to manage interest rate risk, generate interest income, provide liquidity and use as collateral for public deposits and wholesale funding.  Risk and return can be adjusted by altering duration, composition and/or balance of the portfolio.  The weighted-average life of the portfolio was 3.6 years at June 30, 2021 compared to 2.9 years at December 31, 2020.  The increase in the weighted-average life of the securities portfolio was principally due to available for sale securities purchased during the period and lower projected mortgage prepayment estimates.

When compared to December 31, 2020, total investment securities increased by $451.9 million, or 17.9%, during the first six months of 2021.  This increase resulted primarily from purchases of available for sale securities, partially offset by calls, maturities and pay-downs of the loans underlying GSE guaranteed securities.  Trustmark sold no securities during the first six months of 2021 or 2020.

During 2013, Trustmark reclassified approximately $1.099 billion of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity to mitigate the potential adverse impact of a rising interest rate environment on the fair value of the available for sale securities and the related impact on tangible common equity.  The resulting net unrealized holding loss is being amortized over the remaining life of the securities as a yield adjustment in a manner consistent with the amortization or accretion of the original purchase premium or discount on the associated security.  At June 30, 2021, the net unamortized, unrealized loss on the transferred securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, (AOCI) in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets totaled $7.5 million ($5.6 million net of tax) compared to $8.9 million ($6.7 million net of tax) at December 31, 2020.

77


 

Available for sale securities are carried at their estimated fair value with unrealized gains or losses recognized, net of taxes, in AOCI, a separate component of shareholders’ equity.  At June 30, 2021, available for sale securities totaled $2.549 billion, which represented 85.5% of the securities portfolio, compared to $1.992 billion, or 78.7%, at December 31, 2020.  At June 30, 2021, unrealized gains, net on available for sale securities totaled $16.9 million compared to unrealized gains, net of $32.0 million at December 31, 2020.  At June 30, 2021, available for sale securities consisted of obligations of states and political subdivisions, GSE guaranteed mortgage-related securities and direct obligations of government agencies and GSEs.

Held to maturity securities are carried at amortized cost and represent those securities that Trustmark both intends and has the ability to hold to maturity.  At June 30, 2021, held to maturity securities totaled $433.0 million, which represented 14.5% of the total securities portfolio, compared with $538.1 million, or 21.3%, at December 31, 2020.

Management continues to focus on asset quality as one of the strategic goals of the securities portfolio, which is evidenced by the investment of 99.4% of the portfolio in GSE-backed obligations and other Aaa-rated securities as determined by Moody’s Investors Services (Moody’s).  None of the securities owned by Trustmark are collateralized by assets which are considered sub-prime.  Furthermore, outside of stock ownership in the FHLB of Dallas, FHLB of Atlanta and Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Trustmark does not hold any other equity investment in a GSE or other governmental entity.

As of June 30, 2021, Trustmark did not hold securities of any one issuer with a carrying value exceeding 10% of total shareholders’ equity, other than certain GSEs which are exempt from inclusion.  Management continues to closely monitor the credit quality as well as the ratings of the debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by the GSEs and held in Trustmark’s securities portfolio.

The following table presents Trustmark’s securities portfolio by amortized cost and estimated fair value and by credit rating, as determined by Moody’s, at June 30, 2021 ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Amortized Cost

 

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

%

 

 

Amount

 

 

%

 

Securities Available for Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aaa

 

$

2,526,719

 

 

 

99.8

%

 

$

2,542,932

 

 

 

99.8

%

A1 to A3

 

 

1,055

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,107

 

 

 

 

Not Rated (1)

 

 

4,111

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

4,700

 

 

 

0.2

%

Total securities available for sale

 

$

2,531,885

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

2,548,739

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities Held to Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aaa

 

$

420,018

 

 

 

97.0

%

 

$

439,182

 

 

 

97.1

%

Aa1 to Aa3

 

 

8,944

 

 

 

2.1

%

 

 

8,960

 

 

 

2.0

%

Not Rated (1)

 

 

4,050

 

 

 

0.9

%

 

 

4,146

 

 

 

0.9

%

Total securities held to maturity

 

$

433,012

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

452,288

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

(1)

Not rated securities primarily consist of Mississippi municipal general obligations.

The table above presenting the credit rating of Trustmark’s securities is formatted to show the securities according to the credit rating category, and not by category of the underlying security.  At June 30, 2021, approximately 99.8% of the available for sale securities, measured at the estimated fair value, and 97.0% of the held to maturity securities, measured at amortized cost, were rated Aaa.

LHFS

At June 30, 2021, LHFS totaled $332.1 million, consisting of $236.7 million of residential real estate mortgage loans in the process of being sold to third parties and $95.4 million of GNMA optional repurchase loans.  At December 31, 2020, LHFS totaled $447.0 million, consisting of $305.8 million of residential real estate mortgage loans in the process of being sold to third parties and $141.2 million of GNMA optional repurchase loans.  Please refer to the nonperforming assets table that follows for information on GNMA loans eligible for repurchase which are past due 90 days or more.

Trustmark did not exercise its buy-back option on any delinquent loans serviced for GNMA during the first six months of 2021 or 2020.

For additional information regarding the GNMA optional repurchase loans, please see the section captioned “Past Due LHFS” included in Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI of Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

78


 

LHFI

The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown and rapidly evolving. It has caused substantial disruption in international and domestic economies, markets and employment.  The pandemic has had and may continue to have a significant adverse impact on certain industries Trustmark serves, including the restaurant and food services, hotel, retail and energy industries.  See the section captioned “Executive Overview” for further information and discussion regarding the current and anticipated impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, LHFI consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

%

 

 

Amount

 

 

%

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

532,637

 

 

 

5.2

%

 

$

514,056

 

 

 

5.2

%

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

507,733

 

 

 

5.0

%

 

 

524,732

 

 

 

5.3

%

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

2,819,662

 

 

 

27.8

%

 

 

2,709,026

 

 

 

27.6

%

Other real estate secured

 

 

1,078,622

 

 

 

10.6

%

 

 

1,065,964

 

 

 

10.9

%

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

827,665

 

 

 

8.2

%

 

 

794,983

 

 

 

8.1

%

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1,302,663

 

 

 

12.8

%

 

 

1,216,400

 

 

 

12.4

%

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

1,326,605

 

 

 

13.1

%

 

 

1,309,078

 

 

 

13.3

%

Consumer loans

 

 

156,075

 

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

164,386

 

 

 

1.7

%

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

1,136,764

 

 

 

11.2

%

 

 

1,000,776

 

 

 

10.2

%

Other commercial loans

 

 

464,443

 

 

 

4.6

%

 

 

525,123

 

 

 

5.3

%

LHFI

 

$

10,152,869

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

9,824,524

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

LHFI increased $328.3 million, or 3.3%, compared to December 31, 2020.  The increase in LHFI during the first six months of 2021 was primarily due to net growth in LHFI secured by real estate in Trustmark’s Mississippi, Texas, Alabama and Tennessee market regions and state and other political subdivision loans in the Mississippi, Texas, Alabama and Florida market regions, partially offset by declines in other commercial LHFI in the Mississippi, Alabama, Florida and Texas market regions.

LHFI secured by real estate increased $243.8 million, or 3.6%, during the first six months of 2021 primarily due to net growth in LHFI secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties (NFNR LHFI), LHFI secured by 1-4 family residential properties, other construction LHFI, LHFI secured by construction, land development and other land and LHFI secured by other real estate.  NFNR LHFI increased $110.6 million, or 4.1%, during the first six months of 2021, principally due to movement from the other construction loans category.  Excluding other construction loan reclassifications, the NFNR LHFI portfolio decreased $122.7 million, or 4.5%, during the first six months of 2021 primarily due to declines in both nonowner-occupied and owner-occupied loans in the Alabama, Texas, Florida and Tennessee market regions.  LHFI secured by 1-4 family residential properties increased $86.3 million, or 7.1%, during the first six months of 2021 primarily due to growth in the Mississippi market region, reflecting increases in home sales as a result of lower interest rates and higher home values.  Other construction loans increased $32.7 million, or 4.1%, during the first six months of 2021 primarily due to new construction loans across all five market regions, which were largely offset by other construction loans moved to other loan categories upon the completion of the related construction project.  During the first six months of 2021, $371.2 million loans were moved from other construction to other loan categories, including $137.4 million to multi-family residential loans, $160.8 million to nonowner-occupied loans and $72.5 million to owner-occupied loans.  Excluding all reclassifications between loan categories, growth in other construction loans across all five market regions totaled $397.0 million during the first six months of 2021.  LHFI secured by construction, land development and other land increased $18.6 million, or 3.6%, during the first six months of 2021 primarily due to net growth in development, unimproved land and 1-4 family construction loans in Trustmark’s Alabama, Tennessee, Texas and Mississippi market regions.  LHFI secured by other real estate increased $12.7 million, or 1.2%, during the first six months of 2021, primarily due to other construction loans that moved to LHFI secured by multi-family residential properties in the Texas, Alabama and Mississippi market regions.  Excluding other construction loan reclassifications, LHFI secured by other real estate decreased $124.7 million, or 11.7%, during the first six months of 2021.    

State and other political subdivision loans increased $136.0 million, or 13.6%, during the first six months of 2021 primarily due to growth in the Mississippi, Texas, Alabama and Florida market regions.  Other commercial loans, which include loans to financial intermediaries, decreased $60.7 million, or 11.6%, during the first six months of 2021, primarily due to declines in the Mississippi, Alabama, Florida and Texas market regions.

79


 

Commercial and industrial LHFI increased $17.5 million, or 1.3%, during the first six months of 2021, primarily due to growth in Trustmark’s Tennessee, Alabama and Texas market regions partially offset by declines in the Mississippi and Florida market regions.  Trustmark’s exposure to the energy sector is primarily included in the commercial and industrial loan portfolio in Trustmark’s Mississippi and Texas market regions.  At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, energy-related LHFI had outstanding balances of $93.0 million and $102.3 million, respectively, which represented 0.9% of Trustmark’s total LHFI portfolio at June 30, 2021 compared to 1.0% of the total LHFI portfolio at December 31, 2020.  Trustmark has no loan exposure where the source of repayment, or the underlying security of such exposure, is tied to the realization of value from energy reserves.  Should oil prices fall below current levels for a prolonged period of time, there is potential for downgrades to occur.  Management will continue to monitor this exposure.  

The following table provides information regarding Trustmark’s home equity loans and home equity lines of credit which are included in the LHFI secured by 1-4 family residential properties for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Home equity loans

 

$

36,438

 

 

$

40,730

 

Home equity lines of credit

 

 

344,116

 

 

 

352,309

 

Percentage of loans and lines for which Trustmark holds first lien

 

 

58.9

%

 

 

59.5

%

Percentage of loans and lines for which Trustmark does not hold first lien

 

 

41.1

%

 

 

40.5

%

 

Due to the increased risk associated with second liens, loan terms and underwriting guidelines differ from those used for products secured by first liens.  Loan amounts and loan-to-value ratios are limited and are lower for second liens than first liens.  Also, interest rates and maximum amortization periods are adjusted accordingly.  In addition, regardless of lien position, the passing credit score for approval of all home equity lines of credit is generally higher than that of term loans.  The ACL on LHFI is also reflective of the increased risk related to second liens through application of a greater loss factor to this portion of the portfolio.

The following tables provide information regarding the interest rate terms of Trustmark’s LHFI as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands).  Trustmark’s variable rate LHFI are based primarily on various prime and LIBOR interest rate bases.

 

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Fixed

 

 

Variable

 

 

Total

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

167,942

 

 

$

364,695

 

 

$

532,637

 

Other secured by 1- 4 family residential properties

 

 

3,431

 

 

 

504,302

 

 

 

507,733

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

1,545,416

 

 

 

1,274,246

 

 

 

2,819,662

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

312,987

 

 

 

765,635

 

 

 

1,078,622

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

99,797

 

 

 

727,868

 

 

 

827,665

 

Secured by 1- 4 family residential properties

 

 

797,023

 

 

 

505,640

 

 

 

1,302,663

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

716,296

 

 

 

610,309

 

 

 

1,326,605

 

Consumer loans

 

 

130,635

 

 

 

25,440

 

 

 

156,075

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

1,112,679

 

 

 

24,085

 

 

 

1,136,764

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

251,763

 

 

 

212,680

 

 

 

464,443

 

LHFI

 

$

5,137,969

 

 

$

5,014,900

 

 

$

10,152,869

 

 

80


 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Fixed

 

 

Variable

 

 

Total

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

147,640

 

 

$

366,416

 

 

$

514,056

 

Other secured by 1- 4 family residential properties

 

 

17,751

 

 

 

506,981

 

 

 

524,732

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

1,506,066

 

 

 

1,202,960

 

 

 

2,709,026

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

292,878

 

 

 

773,086

 

 

 

1,065,964

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

134,114

 

 

 

660,869

 

 

 

794,983

 

Secured by 1- 4 family residential properties

 

 

732,050

 

 

 

484,350

 

 

 

1,216,400

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

752,502

 

 

 

556,576

 

 

 

1,309,078

 

Consumer loans

 

 

138,989

 

 

 

25,397

 

 

 

164,386

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

970,500

 

 

 

30,276

 

 

 

1,000,776

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

248,860

 

 

 

276,263

 

 

 

525,123

 

LHFI

 

$

4,941,350

 

 

$

4,883,174

 

 

$

9,824,524

 

 

In the following tables, LHFI reported by region (along with related nonperforming assets and net charge-offs) are associated with location of origination except for loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties (representing traditional mortgages) and credit cards.  These loans are included in the Mississippi Region because they are centrally analyzed and approved as part of a specific line of business located at Trustmark’s headquarters in Jackson, Mississippi.

81


 

The following table presents the LHFI composition by region at June 30, 2021 and reflects each region’s diversified mix of loans ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

LHFI Composition by Region

 

Total

 

 

Alabama

 

 

Florida

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

Texas

 

Loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, land development and other land

 

$

532,637

 

 

$

227,638

 

 

$

42,237

 

 

$

154,309

 

 

$

35,855

 

 

$

72,598

 

Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

507,733

 

 

 

113,712

 

 

 

38,443

 

 

 

281,297

 

 

 

61,051

 

 

 

13,230

 

Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties

 

 

2,819,662

 

 

 

783,796

 

 

 

248,269

 

 

 

1,006,513

 

 

 

175,586

 

 

 

605,498

 

Other real estate secured

 

 

1,078,622

 

 

 

287,039

 

 

 

5,734

 

 

 

356,092

 

 

 

19,676

 

 

 

410,081

 

Other loans secured by real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other construction

 

 

827,665

 

 

 

284,518

 

 

 

15,178

 

 

 

203,782

 

 

 

1,079

 

 

 

323,108

 

Secured by 1-4 family residential properties

 

 

1,302,663

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,294,838

 

 

 

7,825

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

 

1,326,605

 

 

 

212,425

 

 

 

21,180

 

 

 

585,821

 

 

 

298,249

 

 

 

208,930

 

Consumer loans

 

 

156,075

 

 

 

22,754

 

 

 

7,656

 

 

 

101,681

 

 

 

19,483

 

 

 

4,501

 

State and other political subdivision loans

 

 

1,136,764

 

 

 

106,447

 

 

 

53,425

 

 

 

722,702

 

 

 

37,777

 

 

 

216,413

 

Other commercial loans

 

 

464,443

 

 

 

77,333

 

 

 

12,968

 

 

 

287,410

 

 

 

65,829

 

 

 

20,903

 

LHFI

 

$

10,152,869

 

 

$

2,115,662

 

 

$

445,090

 

 

$

4,994,445

 

 

$

722,410

 

 

$

1,875,262

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction, Land Development and Other Land Loans by Region

 

Lots

 

$

59,839

 

 

$

22,570

 

 

$

9,368

 

 

$

20,283

 

 

$

1,181

 

 

$

6,437

 

Development

 

 

106,548

 

 

 

41,903

 

 

 

554

 

 

 

37,599

 

 

 

13,211

 

 

 

13,281

 

Unimproved land

 

 

102,023

 

 

 

27,747

 

 

 

12,709

 

 

 

32,564

 

 

 

11,375

 

 

 

17,628

 

1-4 family construction

 

 

264,227

 

 

 

135,418

 

 

 

19,606

 

 

 

63,863

 

 

 

10,088

 

 

 

35,252

 

Construction, land development and other

   land loans

 

$

532,637

 

 

$

227,638

 

 

$

42,237

 

 

$

154,309

 

 

$

35,855

 

 

$

72,598

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans Secured by Nonfarm, Nonresidential Properties by Region

 

Nonowner-occupied:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail

 

$

401,811

 

 

$

158,862

 

 

$

36,208

 

 

$

108,021

 

 

$

22,347

 

 

$

76,373

 

Office

 

 

203,704

 

 

 

48,483

 

 

 

25,523

 

 

 

62,711

 

 

 

12,352

 

 

 

54,635

 

Hotel/motel

 

 

340,867

 

 

 

167,536

 

 

 

65,163

 

 

 

47,535

 

 

 

35,708

 

 

 

24,925

 

Mini-storage

 

 

138,841

 

 

 

22,969

 

 

 

2,151

 

 

 

66,392

 

 

 

382

 

 

 

46,947

 

Industrial

 

 

211,872

 

 

 

43,197

 

 

 

19,008

 

 

 

46,733

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

102,795

 

Health care

 

 

41,722

 

 

 

21,555

 

 

 

1,167

 

 

 

16,468

 

 

 

376

 

 

 

2,156

 

Convenience stores

 

 

22,052

 

 

 

6,742

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

3,737

 

 

 

564

 

 

 

10,809

 

Nursing homes/senior living

 

 

154,351

 

 

 

84,686

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,067

 

 

 

6,598

 

 

 

20,000

 

Other

 

 

85,841

 

 

 

12,990

 

 

 

8,293

 

 

 

27,345

 

 

 

8,962

 

 

 

28,251

 

Total nonowner-occupied loans

 

 

1,601,061

 

 

 

567,020

 

 

 

157,713

 

 

 

422,009

 

 

 

87,428

 

 

 

366,891

 

Owner-occupied:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office

 

 

174,051

 

 

 

40,219

 

 

 

41,695

 

 

 

54,589

 

 

 

8,149

 

 

 

29,399

 

Churches

 

 

100,575

 

 

 

20,331

 

 

 

6,439

 

 

 

50,387

 

 

 

10,056

 

 

 

13,362

 

Industrial warehouses

 

 

177,645

 

 

 

12,820

 

 

 

3,582

 

 

 

49,855

 

 

 

16,729

 

 

 

94,659

 

Health care

 

 

139,456

 

 

 

25,317

 

 

 

7,019

 

 

 

94,162

 

 

 

2,313

 

 

 

10,645

 

Convenience stores

 

 

139,508

 

 

 

16,425

 

 

 

13,211

 

 

 

64,621

 

 

 

511

 

 

 

44,740

 

Retail

 

 

68,652

 

 

 

13,448

 

 

 

9,815

 

 

 

20,565

 

 

 

10,382

 

 

 

14,442

 

Restaurants

 

 

54,470

 

 

 

3,838

 

 

 

4,609

 

 

 

31,637

 

 

 

14,101

 

 

 

285

 

Auto dealerships

 

 

55,141

 

 

 

6,664

 

 

 

267

 

 

 

23,099

 

 

 

25,111

 

 

 

 

Nursing homes/senior living

 

 

202,579

 

 

 

71,916

 

 

 

 

 

 

130,663

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

106,524

 

 

 

5,798

 

 

 

3,919

 

 

 

64,926

 

 

 

806

 

 

 

31,075

 

Total owner-occupied loans

 

 

1,218,601

 

 

 

216,776

 

 

 

90,556

 

 

 

584,504

 

 

 

88,158

 

 

 

238,607

 

Loans secured by nonfarm, nonresidential

   properties

 

$

2,819,662

 

 

$

783,796

 

 

$

248,269

 

 

$

1,006,513

 

 

$

175,586

 

 

$

605,498

 

82


 

 

Allowance for Credit Losses

LHFI

Trustmark’s ACL methodology for LHFI is based upon guidance within FASB ASC Subtopic 326-20, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses – Measured at Amortized Cost,” as well as applicable regulatory guidance.  The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans.  Credit quality within the LHFI portfolio is continuously monitored by Management and is reflected within the ACL for loans.  The ACL is an estimate of expected losses inherent within Trustmark’s existing LHFI portfolio.  The ACL on LHFI is adjusted through the provision for credit losses and reduced by the charge off of loan amounts, net of recoveries.  

The loan loss estimation process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique characteristics of Trustmark’s LHFI portfolio segments.  These segments are further disaggregated into loan classes, the level at which credit risk is estimated.  When computing allowance levels, credit loss assumptions are estimated using a model that categorizes loan pools based on loss history, delinquency status and other credit trends and risk characteristics, including current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future.  Evaluations of the portfolio and individual credits are inherently subjective, as they require estimates, assumptions and judgments as to the facts and circumstances of particular situations.  

The econometric models currently in production reflect segment or pool level sensitivities of probability of default (PD) to changes in macroeconomic variables. By measuring the relationship between defaults and changes in the economy, the quantitative reserve incorporates reasonable and supportable forecasts of future conditions that will affect the value of its assets, as required by FASB ASC Topic 326. Under stable forecasts, these linear regressions will reasonably predict a pool’s PD.  However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the macroeconomic variables used for reasonable and supportable forecasting have changed rapidly.  At the current levels, it is not clear that the models currently in production will produce reasonably representative results since the models were originally estimated using data beginning in 2004 through 2019.  During this period, a traditional, albeit severe, economic recession occurred.  Thus, econometric models are sensitive to similar future levels of PD.  

In order to prevent the econometric models from extrapolating beyond reasonable boundaries of their input variables, Trustmark chose to establish an upper and lower limit process when applying the periodic forecasts. In this way, Management will not rely upon unobserved and untested relationships in the setting of the quantitative reserve. This approach applies to all input variables, including: Southern Unemployment, National Unemployment, National GDP, Southern Vacancy Rate and the Prime Rate. The upper and lower limits are based on the distribution of the macroeconomic variable by selecting extreme percentiles at the upper and lower limits of the distribution, the 1st and 99th percentiles, respectively.  These upper and lower limits are then used to calculate the PD for the forecast time period in which the forecasted values are outside of the upper and lower limit range.  For the current period, the forecast related to the macroeconomic variables used in the quantitative modeling process were positively impacted due to the updated forecast effects.  However, due to multiple periods in the second quarter of 2021 having a PD or LGD at or near zero as a result of the improving macroeconomic forecasts, Management implemented PD and LGD floors to account for the risk associated with each portfolio.  The PD and LGD floors are based on Trustmark’s historical loss experience and applied at a portfolio level.

The external factors qualitative factor is Management’s best judgement on the loan or pool level impact of all factors that affect the portfolio that are not accounted for using any other part of the ACL methodology (e.g., natural disasters, changes in legislation, impacts due to technology and pandemics).  During the third quarter of 2020, Trustmark activated the External Factor – Pandemic to ensure reserve adequacy for collectively evaluated loans most likely to be impacted by the unique economic and behavioral conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional qualitative reserves are derived based on two principles. The first is the disconnect of economic factors to Trustmark’s modeled PD (derived from the econometric models underpinning the quantitative pooled reserves). During the pandemic, extraordinary measures by the federal government were made available to consumers and businesses, including COVID-19 loan payment concessions, direct transfer payments to households, tax deferrals and reduced interest rates, among others. These government interventions may have extended the lag between economic conditions and default, relative to what was captured in the model development data. Because Trustmark’s econometric PD models rely on the observed relationship from the economic downturn from 2007 to 2009 in both timing and severity, Management does not expect the models to reflect these current conditions. For example, while the models would predict contemporaneous unemployment peaks and loan defaults, this may not occur when borrowers can request payment deferrals. Thus, for the affected population, economic conditions are not fully considered as a part of Trustmark’s quantitative reserve.  The second principle is the change in risk that is identified by rating changes. As a part of Trustmark’s credit review process, loans in the affected population have been given more frequent screening to ensure accurate ratings are maintained through this dynamic period. Trustmark’s quantitative reserve does not directly address changes in ratings; thus, a migration qualitative factor was designed to work in concert with the quantitative reserve. In a downturn, the qualitative factor is inactive for most pools because changes in ratings are congruent with changes in macroeconomic conditions, which directly influence the PD models in the quantitative reserve.

83


 

As discussed above, the disconnect of economic factors means that changes in rating caused by deteriorating and weak economic conditions as a result of the pandemic are not being captured in the quantitative reserve.  During the fourth quarter of 2020, due to unforeseen pandemic conditions that varied from Management’s expectations during the third quarter of 2020, additional reserves were further dimensioned in order to appropriately reflect the risk within the portfolio related to the COVID-19 pandemic.  In an effort to ensure the External Factor – Pandemic qualitative factor is reasonable and supportable, historical Trustmark loss data was leveraged to construct a framework that is quantitative in nature.  To dimension the additional reserve, Management uses the sensitivity of the quantitative commercial loan reserve to changes in macroeconomic conditions to apply to loans rated acceptable or better (risk rates 1-4).  In addition, to account for the known changes in risk, a weighted average of the commercial loan portfolio loss rate, derived from the performance trends qualitative factor, is used to dimension additional reserves for downgraded credits.  Loans rated acceptable with risk (risk rate 5) or watch (risk rate 6) received the additional reserves based on the average of the macroeconomic conditions and weighted average of the commercial loan portfolio loss rate while the loans rated special mention (risk rate 7) and substandard (risk rate 8) received additional reserves based on the weighted-average described above.

Determining the appropriateness of the allowance is complex and requires judgement by Management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.  In future periods, evaluations of the overall LHFI portfolio, in light of the factors and forecasts then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the allowance and credit loss expense.

For a complete description of Trustmark’s ACL methodology and the quantitative and qualitative factors included in the calculation, please see Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

At June 30, 2021, the ACL on LHFI was $104.0 million, a decrease of $13.3 million, or 11.3%, when compared with December 31, 2020.  The decrease in the ACL during the first six months of 2021 was principally due to improvements in the macroeconomic forecast used in the calculation of the ACL.  Allocation of Trustmark’s $104.0 million ACL on LHFI, represented 1.04% of commercial LHFI and 0.98% of consumer and home mortgage LHFI, resulting in an ACL to total LHFI of 1.02% as of June 30, 2021.  This compares with an allowance to total LHFI of 1.19% at December 31, 2020, which was allocated to commercial LHFI at 1.20% and to consumer and mortgage LHFI at 1.16%.

The following table presents changes in the ACL, LHFI for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

109,191

 

 

$

100,564

 

 

$

117,306

 

 

$

84,277

 

FASB ASU 2016-13 adoption adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LHFI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,039

)

Allowance for loan losses, acquired loans transfer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

815

 

Acquired loans ACL adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,007

 

Provision for credit losses, LHFI

 

 

(3,991

)

 

 

18,185

 

 

 

(14,492

)

 

 

38,766

 

LHFI charged-off

 

 

(4,828

)

 

 

(1,870

)

 

 

(6,073

)

 

 

(7,415

)

Recoveries

 

 

3,660

 

 

 

2,309

 

 

 

7,291

 

 

 

4,777

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

 

(1,168

)

 

 

439

 

 

 

1,218

 

 

 

(2,638

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

104,032

 

 

$

119,188

 

 

$

104,032

 

 

$

119,188

 

Net charge-offs for the three months ended June 30, 2021 increased $1.6 million when compared to net recoveries for the same time period in 2020.  The increase in net charge-offs when the second quarter of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, was primarily due to an increase in charge-offs in the Mississippi market region partially offset by an increase in recoveries in the Tennessee and Texas market regions.  Net recoveries for the first six months of 2021 increased $3.9 million when compared to net charge-offs for the first six months of 2020.  The increase in net recoveries when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020 was primarily due to declines in charge-offs in the Tennessee and Alabama market regions as well as increases in recoveries in the Mississippi and Tennessee market regions partially offset by an increase in charge-offs in the Mississippi market region.

84


 

The following table presents the net (charge-offs) recoveries by geographic market region for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Alabama

 

$

203

 

 

$

526

 

 

$

305

 

 

$

(554

)

Florida

 

 

167

 

 

 

(127

)

 

 

197

 

 

 

(63

)

Mississippi

 

 

(3,071

)

 

 

(86

)

 

 

(864

)

 

 

40

 

Tennessee

 

 

1,031

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

1,078

 

 

 

(2,120

)

Texas

 

 

502

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

502

 

 

 

59

 

Total net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

$

(1,168

)

 

$

439

 

 

$

1,218

 

 

$

(2,638

)

The provision for credit losses, LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled -0.16% and -0.28% of average loans (LHFS and LHFI), respectively, compared to 0.74% and 0.80% of average loans (LHFS and LHFI) for the same time periods in 2020, respectively.  The negative provision for credit losses on LHFI for the second quarter of 2021 primarily reflected a decline in required reserves as a result of risk rate upgrades due to improvements in credit quality, charge-down of an individually evaluated credit for which reserves were previously established and improvements in macroeconomic forecasts, partially offset by an increase in reserves as a result of the implementation of PD and LGD floors at a portfolio level to ensure appropriate risk is reflected as macroeconomic conditions continue to improve.  The negative provision for credit losses for the first six months of 2021 primarily reflected declines in required reserves as a result of improvements in the macroeconomic forecast used in the calculation of the ACL.

Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures

Trustmark maintains a separate ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, which is included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.  Expected credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures are estimated by calculating a commitment usage factor over the contractual period for exposures that are not unconditionally cancellable by Trustmark.  Trustmark calculates a loan pool level unfunded amount for the period.  Trustmark calculates an expected funding rate each period which is applied to each pool’s unfunded commitment balances to ensure that reserves will be applied to each pool based upon balances expected to be funded based upon historical levels.  Additionally, a reserve rate is applied to the unfunded commitment balance, which incorporates both quantitative and qualitative aspects of the current period’s expected credit loss rate.  The reserve rate is loan pool specific and is applied to the unfunded amount to ensure loss factors, both quantitative and qualitative, are being considered on the unfunded portion of the loan pool, consistent with the methodology applied to the funded loan pools.  See the section captioned “Lending Related” in Note 12 – Contingencies included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report for complete description of Trustmark’s ACL methodology on off-balance sheet credit exposures.

Adjustments to the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures are recorded to the provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures. At June 30, 2021, the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $33.7 million compared to $38.6 million at December 31, 2020, a decrease of $4.8 million, or 12.5%.  The provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $4.5 million and a negative $4.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $6.2 million and $13.0 million for the same time periods in 2020, respectively.  The provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the second quarter of 2021 primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of an increase in off-balance sheet credit exposures and the implementation of the PD and LGD floors at a portfolio level.  The PD and LGD floors are based on Trustmark’s historical loss experience and applied at a portfolio level.  The negative provision for credit losses, off-balance sheet credit exposures for the first six months of 2021 primarily reflected declines in required reserves as a result of improvements in the overall economy and macroeconomic factors used in the calculation of the ACL.

85


 

Nonperforming Assets

The table below provides the components of nonperforming assets by geographic market region at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

Nonaccrual LHFI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama

 

$

8,952

 

 

$

9,221

 

Florida

 

 

467

 

 

 

572

 

Mississippi

 

 

23,422

 

 

 

35,015

 

Tennessee

 

 

10,751

 

 

 

12,572

 

Texas

 

 

7,856

 

 

 

5,748

 

Total nonaccrual LHFI

 

 

51,448

 

 

 

63,128

 

Other real estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama

 

 

2,830

 

 

 

3,271

 

Mississippi

 

 

6,550

 

 

 

8,330

 

Tennessee

 

 

59

 

 

 

50

 

Total other real estate

 

 

9,439

 

 

 

11,651

 

Total nonperforming assets

 

$

60,887

 

 

$

74,779

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperforming assets/total loans (LHFI and LHFS) and ORE

 

 

0.58

%

 

 

0.73

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans past due 90 days or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LHFI

 

$

423

 

 

$

1,576

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LHFS - Guaranteed GNMA serviced loans (1)

 

$

81,538

 

 

$

119,409

 

 

(1)

No obligation to repurchase.

See the previous discussion of LHFS for more information on Trustmark’s serviced GNMA loans eligible for repurchase and the impact of Trustmark’s repurchases of delinquent mortgage loans under the GNMA optional repurchase program.

Nonaccrual LHFI

At June 30, 2021, nonaccrual LHFI totaled $51.4 million, or 0.58% of total LHFS and LHFI, reflecting a decrease of $11.7 million, or 18.5%, relative to December 31, 2020.  The decrease in nonaccrual LHFI during the first six months of 2021 was primarily due to the pay down and charge off of one large energy-related commercial credit as well as one large commercial credit which was returned to accrual status in Trustmark’s Mississippi market region.  

As of June 30, 2021, nonaccrual energy-related LHFI totaled $1.5 million and represented 1.6% of Trustmark’s total energy-related portfolio, compared to $10.4 million, or 10.2% of Trustmark’s total energy-related portfolio, as of December 31, 2020.  The decline in nonaccrual energy-related LHFI was primarily due to the pay down and charge off of one large credit in the Mississippi market region.  For additional information regarding nonaccrual LHFI, see the section captioned “Nonaccrual and Past Due LHFI” included in Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Other Real Estate

Other real estate at June 30, 2021 decreased $2.2 million, or 19.0%, when compared with December 31, 2020.  The decrease in other real estate was principally due to an increase in reserves for other real estate write-downs in Trustmark’s Mississippi and Alabama market regions as well as properties sold in the Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee market regions.

86


 

The following tables illustrate changes in other real estate by geographic market region for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Alabama

 

 

Florida

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

Texas

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

10,651

 

 

$

3,085

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,566

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Additions

 

 

382

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

Disposals

 

 

(299

)

 

 

(93

)

 

 

 

 

 

(206

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write-downs

 

 

(1,295

)

 

 

(162

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,148

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

9,439

 

 

$

2,830

 

 

$

 

 

$

6,550

 

 

$

59

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Alabama

 

 

Florida

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

Texas

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

24,847

 

 

$

6,229

 

 

$

4,835

 

 

$

13,296

 

 

$

487

 

 

$

 

Additions

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

Disposals

 

 

(6,794

)

 

 

(1,477

)

 

 

(1,209

)

 

 

(4,037

)

 

 

(71

)

 

 

 

Write-downs

 

 

153

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

18,276

 

 

$

4,766

 

 

$

3,665

 

 

$

9,408

 

 

$

437

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Alabama

 

 

Florida

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

Texas

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

11,651

 

 

$

3,271

 

 

$

 

 

$

8,330

 

 

$

50

 

 

$

 

Additions

 

 

382

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

Disposals

 

 

(1,149

)

 

 

(229

)

 

 

 

 

 

(860

)

 

 

(60

)

 

 

 

Write-downs

 

 

(1,445

)

 

 

(212

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,258

)

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

9,439

 

 

$

2,830

 

 

$

 

 

$

6,550

 

 

$

59

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Alabama

 

 

Florida

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

Texas

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

29,248

 

 

$

8,133

 

 

$

5,877

 

 

$

14,919

 

 

$

319

 

 

$

 

Additions

 

 

406

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

245

 

 

 

 

Disposals

 

 

(10,534

)

 

 

(2,698

)

 

 

(2,196

)

 

 

(5,529

)

 

 

(111

)

 

 

 

Write-downs

 

 

(844

)

 

 

(746

)

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(66

)

 

 

(16

)

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

18,276

 

 

$

4,766

 

 

$

3,665

 

 

$

9,408

 

 

$

437

 

 

$

 

Other real estate is revalued on an annual basis or more often if market conditions necessitate.  Subsequent to foreclosure, losses on the periodic revaluation of the property are charged against the reserve for other real estate write-downs or net income in other real estate expense, if a reserve does not exist.  Write-downs of other real estate increased $601 thousand, or 71.2%, when the first six months of 2021 is compared to the same time period in 2020, primarily due to an increase in reserves for other real estate write-downs in the Mississippi market region partially offset by decrease in write-downs of other real estate properties in the Alabama, Florida and Tennessee market regions and properties sold for which a reserve for write-down was previously recorded.

For additional information regarding other real estate, please see Note 5 – Other Real Estate included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Deposits

Trustmark’s deposits are its primary source of funding and consist of core deposits from the communities Trustmark serves.  Deposits include interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand accounts, savings, money market, certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts.  Total deposits were $14.632 billion at June 30, 2021 compared to $14.049 billion at December 31, 2020, an increase of $583.3 million, or 4.2%, reflecting increases in deposit accounts as customers deposited proceeds from line draws, PPP loans and other COVID-19 related stimulus programs.  During the first six months of 2021, noninterest-bearing deposits increased $98.0 million, or 2.3%, principally due to growth in consumer and commercial noninterest-bearing demand deposit accounts.  Interest-bearing deposits increased $485.3 million, or 5.0%, during the first six months of 2021, primarily due to growth in all categories of interest checking and money market deposit accounts as well as consumer savings accounts, partially offset by declines in all categories of certificates of deposits.

87


 

Borrowings

Trustmark uses short-term borrowings, such as federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and short-term FHLB advances, to fund growth of earning assets in excess of deposit growth.  See the section captioned “Liquidity” for further discussion of the components of Trustmark’s excess funding capacity.

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements totaled $157.2 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $164.5 million at December 31, 2020, a decrease of $7.3 million, or 4.5%, and represented customer related transactions, such as commercial sweep repurchase balances.  Trustmark had no upstream federal funds purchased at June 30, 2021 or December 31, 2020.

Other borrowings totaled $117.2 million at June 30, 2021, a decrease of $51.0 million, or 30.3%, when compared with $168.3 million at December 31, 2020, primarily due to the decrease in the amount of GNMA loans eligible for repurchase.  

Legal Environment

Information required in this section is set forth under the heading “Legal Proceedings” of Note 12 – Contingencies included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Information required in this section is set forth under the heading “Lending Related” of Note 12 – Contingencies included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Contractual Obligations

Payments due from Trustmark under specified long-term and certain other binding contractual obligations were scheduled in Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report.  The most significant obligations, other than obligations under deposit contracts and short-term borrowings, were for operating leases for banking facilities.  There have been no material changes in Trustmark’s contractual obligations since year-end.

Capital Resources

At June 30, 2021, Trustmark’s total shareholders’ equity was $1.779 billion, an increase of $38.2 million, or 2.2%, when compared to December 31, 2020.  During the first six months of 2021, shareholders’ equity increased primarily as a result of net income of $99.9 million, partially offset by common stock dividends of $29.3 million, common stock repurchases of $25.0 million and a decline in the fair market value of securities available for sale, net of tax, of $11.4 million.  Trustmark utilizes a capital model in order to provide Management with a monthly tool for analyzing changes in its strategic capital ratios.  This allows Management to hold sufficient capital to provide for growth opportunities and protect the balance sheet against sudden adverse market conditions, while maintaining an attractive return on equity to shareholders.

Regulatory Capital

Trustmark and TNB are subject to minimum risk-based capital and leverage capital requirements, as described in the section captioned “Capital Adequacy” included in Part I. Item 1. – Business of Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report, which are administered by the federal bank regulatory agencies.  These capital requirements, as defined by federal regulations, involve quantitative and qualitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet instruments.  Trustmark’s and TNB’s minimum risk-based capital requirements include a capital conservation buffer of 2.50% at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.  AOCI is not included in computing regulatory capital.  Trustmark has elected the five-year phase-in transition period (through December 31, 2024) related to adopting FASB ASU 2016-13 for regulatory capital purposes.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements of Trustmark and TNB and limit Trustmark’s and TNB’s ability to pay dividends.  As of June 30, 2021, Trustmark and TNB exceeded all applicable minimum capital standards.  In addition, Trustmark and TNB met applicable regulatory guidelines to be considered well-capitalized at June 30, 2021.  To be categorized in this manner, Trustmark and TNB maintained, as applicable, minimum common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage ratios, and were not subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive issued by their primary federal regulators to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measures.  There are no significant conditions or events that have occurred since June 30, 2021, which Management believes have affected Trustmark’s or TNB’s present classification.  

88


 

During the fourth quarter of 2020, Trustmark enhanced its capital structure with the issuance of $125.0 million of subordinated notes.  The subordinated notes were sold at an underwriting discount of 1.2%, resulting in net proceeds to Trustmark of $123.5 million before deducting offering expenses. At both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the carrying amount of the subordinated notes was $122.9 million.  The subordinated notes mature December 1, 2030 and are redeemable at Trustmark’s option under certain circumstances.  For regulatory capital purposes, the subordinated notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for Trustmark at December 31, 2020.  Trustmark may utilize the full carrying value of the subordinated notes as Tier 2 capital until December 1, 2025 (five years prior to maturity).  Beginning December 1, 2025, the subordinated notes will phase out of Tier 2 capital at a rate of 20.0% each year until maturity.

In 2006, Trustmark enhanced its capital structure with the issuance of trust preferred securities.  For regulatory capital purposes, the trust preferred securities currently qualify as Tier 1 capital.  Trustmark intends to continue to utilize $60.0 million in trust preferred securities issued by Trustmark Preferred Capital Trust I (the Trust) as Tier 1 capital up to the regulatory limit, as permitted by the grandfather provision in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Basel III capital rules adopted by the federal banking agencies.

Refer to the section captioned “Regulatory Capital” included in Note 15 – Shareholders’ Equity in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report for an illustration of Trustmark’s and TNB’s actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios under regulatory capital standards in effect at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

Dividends on Common Stock

Dividends per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $0.46.  Trustmark’s indicated dividend for 2021 is $0.92 per common share, which is the same as dividends per common share declared in 2020.

Stock Repurchase Program

The Board of Directors of Trustmark authorized a stock repurchase program effective April 1, 2019, under which $100.0 million of Trustmark’s outstanding common shares could be acquired through March 31, 2020.  Trustmark repurchased approximately 887 thousand shares of its outstanding common stock valued at $27.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2020.  Under this authority, Trustmark repurchased approximately 1.5 million shares valued at $47.2 million.

On January 28, 2020, the Board of Directors of Trustmark authorized a new stock repurchase program, effective April 1, 2020, under which $100.0 million of Trustmark’s outstanding common stock may be acquired through December 31, 2021.  On March 9, 2020, Trustmark suspended its share repurchase programs to preserve capital to support customers during the COVID-19 pandemic.  Trustmark resumed the repurchase of its shares in January 2021.  Under this authority, Trustmark repurchased approximately 630 thousand shares of its outstanding common stock valued at $20.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2021.  During the first six months of 2021, Trustmark repurchased approximately 775 thousand shares of its outstanding common stock valued at $25.0 million.  The shares may be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or private transactions, depending on market conditions, and in conjunction with its disciplined share repurchase framework.  There is no guarantee as to the number of shares that may be repurchased by Trustmark, and Trustmark may discontinue repurchases at any time at Management’s discretion.

Liquidity

Liquidity is the ability to ensure that sufficient cash flow and liquid assets are available to satisfy current and future financial obligations, including demand for loans and deposit withdrawals, funding operating costs and other corporate purposes.  Consistent cash flows from operations and adequate capital provide internally generated liquidity.  Furthermore, Management maintains funding capacity from a variety of external sources to meet daily funding needs, such as those required to meet deposit withdrawals, loan disbursements and security settlements.  Liquidity strategy also includes the use of wholesale funding sources to provide for the seasonal fluctuations of deposit and loan demand and the cyclical fluctuations of the economy that impact the availability of funds.  Management keeps excess funding capacity available to meet potential demands associated with adverse circumstances.

The asset side of the balance sheet provides liquidity primarily through maturities and cash flows from loans and securities as well as the ability to sell certain loans and securities while the liability portion of the balance sheet provides liquidity primarily through noninterest and interest-bearing deposits.  Trustmark utilizes federal funds purchased, FHLB advances, securities sold under repurchase agreements as well as the Federal Reserve Discount Window (Discount Window) and, on a limited basis as discussed below, brokered deposits to provide additional liquidity.  Access to these additional sources represents Trustmark’s incremental borrowing capacity.

89


 

Deposit accounts represent Trustmark’s largest funding source.  Average deposits totaled to $14.319 billion for the first six months of 2021 and represented approximately 85.0% of average liabilities and shareholders’ equity, compared to average deposits of $12.298 billion, which represented 84.3% of average liabilities and shareholders’ equity for the first six months of 2020.

Trustmark utilizes a limited amount of brokered deposits to supplement other wholesale funding sources.  At June 30, 2021, brokered sweep Money Market Deposit Account (MMDA) deposits totaled $28.4 million compared to $28.1 million at December 31, 2020.

At both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Trustmark had no upstream federal funds purchased.  Trustmark maintains adequate federal funds lines to provide sufficient short-term liquidity.  

Trustmark maintains a relationship with the FHLB of Dallas, which provided no outstanding short-term or long-term advances at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.  Trustmark had a $500.0 million letter of credit outstanding with the FHLB of Dallas at June 30, 2021 compared to a $600.0 million letter of credit outstanding at December 31, 2020.  Under the existing borrowing agreement, Trustmark had sufficient qualifying collateral to increase FHLB advances or letters of credit with the FHLB of Dallas by $2.869 billion at June 30, 2021.  

In addition, at June 30, 2021, Trustmark had no short-term and $107 thousand in long-term FHLB advances outstanding with the FHLB of Atlanta, which were acquired in the BancTrust merger in 2013, compared to $625 thousand in short-term and $116 thousand in long-term FHLB advances at December 31, 2020.  Trustmark has non-member status and thus no additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB of Atlanta.

Additionally, Trustmark has the ability to leverage its unencumbered investment securities as collateral.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had approximately $818.0 million available in unencumbered agency securities compared to $560.0 million at December 31, 2020.

Another borrowing source is the Discount Window.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had approximately $871.9 million available in collateral capacity at the Discount Window primarily from pledges of commercial and industrial LHFI, compared with $893.5 million at December 31, 2020.

Additionally, on March 15, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FRB reduced reserve requirements for insured depository institutions to zero percent, which increased TNB’s available liquidity.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, Trustmark agreed to issue and sell $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.625% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes. The subordinated notes were sold at an underwriting discount of 1.2%, resulting in net proceeds to Trustmark of $123.5 million before deducting offering expenses. At both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the carrying amount of the subordinated notes was $122.9 million.  The subordinated notes mature December 1, 2030 and are redeemable at Trustmark’s option under certain circumstances. The subordinated notes are unsecured obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to all of Trustmark’s existing and future senior indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured. The subordinated notes are obligations of Trustmark only and are not obligations of, and are not guaranteed by, any of its subsidiaries, including TNB. Trustmark intends to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes.

During 2006, Trustmark completed a private placement of $60.0 million of trust preferred securities through a newly formed Delaware trust affiliate, the Trust.  The trust preferred securities mature September 30, 2036 and are redeemable at Trustmark’s option.  The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities were used by the Trust to purchase $61.9 million in aggregate principal amount of Trustmark’s junior subordinated debentures.

The Board of Directors of Trustmark currently has the authority to issue up to 20.0 million preferred shares with no par value.  The ability to issue preferred shares in the future will provide Trustmark with additional financial and management flexibility for general corporate and acquisition purposes.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Liquidity position and strategy are reviewed regularly by Management and continuously adjusted in relationship to Trustmark’s overall strategy.  Management believes that Trustmark has sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet presently known cash flow requirements arising from ongoing business transactions.

Asset/Liability Management

Overview

Market risk reflects the potential risk of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and market prices.  Trustmark has risk management policies to monitor and limit exposure to market risk.  Trustmark’s primary market risk is interest rate risk created by

90


 

core banking activities.  Interest rate risk is the potential variability of the income generated by Trustmark’s financial products or services, which results from changes in various market interest rates.  Market rate changes may take the form of absolute shifts, variances in the relationships between different rates and changes in the shape or slope of the interest rate term structure.

On March 5, 2021, the United Kingdom’s FCA, which regulates LIBOR, confirmed that the publication of most LIBOR term rates will end on June 30, 2023 (excluding one-week U.S. LIBOR and two-month U.S. LIBOR, the publication of which will end on December 31, 2021).  Trustmark has a significant number of loans, derivative contracts, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR.  The transition from LIBOR could create considerable costs and additional risk.  Trustmark cannot predict what the ultimate impact of the transition from LIBOR will be; however, failure to adequately manage the transition could have a material adverse effect on Trustmark’s business, financial condition and results of operations.  Trustmark has organized an internal LIBOR Transition Working Group to identify operational and contractual best practices, assess its risk, manage the transition, facilitate communication with its customers and monitor the impacts.  For additional information regarding the transition from LIBOR and Trustmark’s management of this transition, please see the respective risk factor included in Part I. Item 1A. – Risk Factors, of Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report.

Management continually develops and applies cost-effective strategies to manage these risks.  Management’s Asset/Liability Committee sets the day-to-day operating guidelines, approves strategies affecting net interest income and coordinates activities within policy limits established by the Board of Directors of Trustmark.  A key objective of the asset/liability management program is to quantify, monitor and manage interest rate risk and to assist Management in maintaining stability in the net interest margin under varying interest rate environments.

Derivatives

Trustmark uses financial derivatives for management of interest rate risk.  Management’s Asset/Liability Committee, in its oversight role for the management of interest rate risk, approves the use of derivatives in balance sheet hedging strategies.  The most common derivatives employed by Trustmark are interest rate lock commitments, forward contracts (both futures contracts and options on futures contracts), interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and interest rate floors.  As a general matter, the values of these instruments are designed to be inversely related to the values of the assets that they hedge (i.e., if the value of the hedged asset falls, the value of the related hedge rises).  In addition, Trustmark has entered into derivatives contracts as counterparty to one or more customers in connection with loans extended to those customers.  These transactions are designed to hedge interest rate, currency or other exposures of the customers and are not entered into by Trustmark for speculative purposes.  Increased federal regulation of the derivatives markets may increase the cost to Trustmark to administer derivatives programs.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

As part of Trustmark’s risk management strategy in the mortgage banking business, various derivative instruments such as interest rate lock commitments and forward sales contracts are utilized.  Rate lock commitments are residential mortgage loan commitments with customers, which guarantee a specified interest rate for a specified period of time.  Trustmark’s obligations under forward contracts consist of commitments to deliver mortgage loans, originated and/or purchased, in the secondary market at a future date.  The gross notional amount of Trustmark’s off-balance sheet obligations under these derivative instruments totaled $556.3 million at June 30, 2021, with a positive valuation adjustment of $3.3 million, compared to $706.8 million, with a positive valuation adjustment of $6.4 million at December 31, 2020.

Trustmark utilizes a portfolio of exchange-traded derivative instruments, such as Treasury note futures contracts and option contracts, to achieve a fair value return that economically hedges changes in fair value of the MSR attributable to interest rates.  These transactions are considered freestanding derivatives that do not otherwise qualify for hedge accounting under GAAP.  The total notional amount of these derivative instruments was $374.5 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $326.5 million at December 31, 2020.  These exchange-traded derivative instruments are accounted for at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and are offset by the changes in the fair value of the MSR.  The MSR fair value represents the present value of future cash flows, which among other things includes decay and the effect of changes in interest rates.  Ineffectiveness of hedging the MSR fair value is measured by comparing the change in value of hedge instruments to the change in the fair value of the MSR asset attributable to changes in interest rates and other market driven changes in valuation inputs and assumptions.  The impact of this strategy resulted in a net positive ineffectiveness of $1.3 million and a net negative ineffectiveness of $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, the impact was a net positive ineffectiveness of $1.5 million and $7.9 million, respectively.

Trustmark offers certain interest rate derivatives products directly to qualified commercial lending clients seeking to manage their interest rate risk under loans they have entered into with TNB.  Trustmark economically hedges interest rate swap transactions executed with commercial lending clients by entering into offsetting interest rate swap transactions with institutional derivatives

91


 

market participants.  Derivatives transactions executed as part of this program are not designated as qualifying hedging relationships under GAAP and are, therefore, carried on Trustmark’s financial statements at fair value with the change in fair value recorded as noninterest income in bank card and other fees.  Because these derivatives have mirror-image contractual terms, in addition to collateral provisions which mitigate the impact of non-performance risk, the changes in fair value are expected to substantially offset.  The Chicago Mercantile Exchange rules legally characterize variation margin collateral payments made or received for centrally cleared interest rate swaps as settlements rather than collateral.  As a result, centrally cleared interest rate swaps included in other assets and other liabilities are presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  As of June 30, 2021, Trustmark had interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.115 billion related to this program, compared to $1.125 billion as of December 31, 2020.

Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features

Trustmark has agreements with its financial institution counterparties that contain provisions where if Trustmark defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then Trustmark could also be deemed to be in default on its derivatives obligations.

At June 30, 2021, the termination value of interest rate swaps in a liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $950 thousand compared to $1.3 million at December 31, 2020.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had posted collateral of $1.1 million against its obligations because of negotiated thresholds and minimum transfer amounts under these agreements.  If Trustmark had breached any of these triggering provisions at June 30, 2021, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value (which is expected to approximate fair market value).

Credit risk participation agreements arise when Trustmark contracts with other financial institutions, as a guarantor or beneficiary, to share credit risk associated with certain interest rate swaps.  These agreements provide for reimbursement of losses resulting from a third-party default on the underlying swap.  At June 30, 2021, Trustmark had entered into six risk participation agreements as a beneficiary with an aggregate notional amount of $50.3 million, compared to three risk participation agreements as a beneficiary with an aggregate notional amount of $41.1 million at December 31, 2020. At both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Trustmark had entered into 24 risk participation agreements as a guarantor with an aggregate notional amount of $174.2 million and $172.0 million, respectively.  The aggregate fair values of these risk participation agreements were immaterial at both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

Trustmark’s participation in the derivatives markets is subject to increased federal regulation of these markets.  Trustmark believes that it may continue to use financial derivatives to manage interest rate risk and also to offer derivatives products to certain qualified commercial lending clients in compliance with the Volcker Rule.  However, the increased federal regulation of the derivatives markets has increased the cost to Trustmark of administering its derivatives programs.  Some of these costs (particularly compliance costs related to the Volcker Rule and other federal regulations) are expected to recur in the future.

Market/Interest Rate Risk Management

The primary purpose in managing interest rate risk is to invest capital effectively and preserve the value created by the core banking business.  This is accomplished through the development and implementation of lending, funding, pricing and hedging strategies designed to maximize net interest income performance under varying interest rate environments subject to specific liquidity and interest rate risk guidelines.

Financial simulation models are the primary tools used by Management’s Asset/Liability Committee to measure interest rate exposure.  Using a wide range of scenarios, Management is provided with extensive information on the potential impact on net interest income caused by changes in interest rates.  Models are structured to simulate cash flows and accrual characteristics of Trustmark’s balance sheet.  Assumptions are made about the direction and volatility of interest rates, the slope of the yield curve and the changing composition of Trustmark’s balance sheet, resulting from both strategic plans and customer behavior.  In addition, the model incorporates Management’s assumptions and expectations regarding such factors as loan and deposit growth, pricing, prepayment speeds and spreads between interest rates.

92


 

Based on the results of the simulation models using static balances, the table below summarizes the effect various one-year interest rate shift scenarios would have on net interest income compared to a base case, flat scenario at June 30, 2021 and 2020.  At June 30, 2021 and 2020, the impact of a 200-basis point drop scenario was excluded from the table below due to the low interest rate environment.

 

 

Estimated % Change

in Net Interest Income

 

Change in Interest Rates

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

+200 basis points

 

 

21.8

%

 

 

10.9

%

+100 basis points

 

 

11.1

%

 

 

5.5

%

-100 basis points

 

 

-7.9

%

 

 

-5.1

%

 

Management cannot provide any assurance about the actual effect of changes in interest rates on net interest income.  The estimates provided do not include the effects of possible strategic changes in the balances of various assets and liabilities throughout 2021 or additional actions Trustmark could undertake in response to changes in interest rates.  Management will continue to prudently manage the balance sheet in an effort to control interest rate risk and maintain profitability over the long term.

Another component of interest rate risk management is measuring the economic value-at-risk for a given change in market interest rates.  The economic value-at-risk may indicate risks associated with longer-term balance sheet items that may not affect net interest income at risk over shorter time periods.  Trustmark uses computer-modeling techniques to determine the present value of all asset and liability cash flows (both on- and off-balance sheet), adjusted for prepayment expectations, using a market discount rate.  The economic value of equity (EVE), also known as net portfolio value, is defined as the difference between the present value of asset cash flows and the present value of liability cash flows.  The resulting change in EVE in different market rate environments, from the base case scenario, is the amount of EVE at risk from those rate environments.  

The following table summarizes the effect that various interest rate shifts would have on net portfolio value at June 30, 2021 and 2020.  Based upon quarter-end current and implied market rates, scenarios reflecting lower rates could result in negative interest rates. The U.S. has never experienced an interest rate environment where the FRB has a negative interest rate policy. While the impact of negative interest rates on earnings-at-risk would vary by scenario, a parallel shift downward would be expected to negatively impact net interest income. However, in a negative interest rate environment, the modeling assumptions used for certain assets and liabilities require additional management judgment and therefore, the actual outcomes may differ from the modeled assumptions. At June 30, 2021 and 2020, the results of the 100-basis point drop scenario and the 200-basis point drop scenario were excluded from the table below due to the low interest rate environment.

 

 

 

Estimated % Change

in Net Portfolio Value

 

Change in Interest Rates

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

+200 basis points

 

 

12.2

%

 

 

16.1

%

+100 basis points

 

 

7.0

%

 

 

9.4

%

 

Trustmark determines the fair value of the MSR using a valuation model administered by a third party that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income.  The model incorporates assumptions that market participants use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, default rates, cost to service (including delinquency and foreclosure costs), escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income and other ancillary income such as late fees.  Management reviews all significant assumptions quarterly.  Mortgage loan prepayment speeds, a key assumption in the model, is the annual rate at which borrowers are forecasted to repay their mortgage loan principal.  The discount rate used to determine the present value of estimated future net servicing income, another key assumption in the model, is an estimate of the required rate of return investors in the market would require for an asset with similar risk.  Both assumptions can, and generally will, change as market conditions and interest rates change.

By way of example, an increase in either the prepayment speed or discount rate assumption will result in a decrease in the fair value of the MSR, while a decrease in either assumption will result in an increase in the fair value of the MSR.  In recent years, there have been significant market-driven fluctuations in loan prepayment speeds and discount rates.  These fluctuations can be rapid and may continue to be significant.  Therefore, estimating prepayment speed and/or discount rates within ranges that market participants would use in determining the fair value of the MSR requires significant management judgment.

93


 

At June 30, 2021, the MSR fair value was $80.8 million, compared to $57.8 million at June 30, 2020.  The impact on the MSR fair value of a 10% adverse change in prepayment speed or a 100 basis point increase in discount rate at June 30, 2021, would be a decline in fair value of approximately $4.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively, compared to a decline in fair value of approximately $4.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, at June 30, 2020.  Changes of equal magnitude in the opposite direction would produce similar increases in fair value in the respective amounts.

Critical Accounting Policies

For an overview of Trustmark’s critical accounting policies, see the section captioned “Critical Accounting Policies” included in Part II. Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report.  There have been no significant changes in Trustmark’s critical accounting policies during the first six months of 2021.

For additional information regarding Trustmark’s basis of presentation and accounting policies, see Note 1 – Business, Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Principles of Consolidation included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Accounting Policies Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

For a complete list of recently adopted and pending accounting policies and the impact on Trustmark, see Note 19 – Accounting Policies Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information required by this item is included in the discussion of Market/Interest Rate Risk Management found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by Trustmark’s Management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of Trustmark’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer concluded that Trustmark’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in Trustmark’s internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Trustmark’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information required in this section is set forth under the heading “Legal Proceedings” of Note 12 – Contingencies in Part I. Item 1 – Financial Statements of this report.

In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 450-20, “Loss Contingencies,” Trustmark will establish an accrued liability for litigation matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable.  At the present time, Trustmark believes, based on its evaluation and the advice of legal counsel, that a loss in any such proceeding is not probable and reasonably estimable.  All matters will continue to be monitored for further developments that would make such loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable.  In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal proceedings, Trustmark cannot predict the eventual outcomes of the currently pending matters or the timing of their ultimate resolution.  Trustmark currently believes, however, based upon the advice of legal counsel and Management’s evaluation and after taking into account its current insurance coverage, that the legal proceedings currently pending should not have a material adverse effect on Trustmark’s consolidated financial condition.

94


 

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

There has been no material change in the risk factors previously disclosed in Trustmark’s 2020 Annual Report.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On January 28, 2020, the Board of Directors of Trustmark authorized a new stock repurchase program, effective April 1, 2020, under which $100.0 million of Trustmark’s outstanding common stock may be acquired through December 31, 2021.  On March 9, 2020, Trustmark suspended its share repurchase programs to preserve capital to support customers during the COVID-19 pandemic.  Trustmark resumed the repurchase of its shares in January 2021.  The shares may be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or private transactions, depending on market conditions, and in conjunction with its disciplined share repurchase framework.  There is no guarantee as to the number of shares that may be repurchased by Trustmark, and Trustmark may discontinue repurchases at any time at Management’s discretion.

The following table provides information with respect to purchases by Trustmark or made on behalf of Trustmark of its common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2021 ($ in thousands, except per share amounts):

Period

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

 

 

Average Price Paid Per Share

 

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan

 

 

Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan at the End of the Period

 

April 1, 2021 to April 30, 2021

 

 

15,800

 

 

$

32.46

 

 

 

15,800

 

 

$

95,304

 

May 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021

 

 

213,875

 

 

 

33.49

 

 

 

213,875

 

 

 

88,141

 

June 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021

 

 

400,145

 

 

 

32.79

 

 

 

400,145

 

 

 

75,021

 

Total

 

 

629,820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

629,820

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

 

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference.

 

95


 

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31-a

 

Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31-b

 

Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32-a  

 

Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32-b  

 

Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

101

 

Inline XBRL Interactive Data.

 

 

 

104

 

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

 

 

 

 

All other exhibits are omitted, as they are inapplicable or not required by the related instructions.

 

 

96


 

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

 

BY:

 

/s/ Duane A. Dewey

 

BY:

 

/s/ Thomas C. Owens

 

 

Duane A. Dewey

 

 

 

Thomas C. Owens

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DATE:

 

August 5, 2021

 

DATE:

 

August 5, 2021

 

 

97