UNITED BANCSHARES INC/OH - Annual Report: 2005 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
For the year ended December 31, 2005
Commission File No.: 000-29283
UNITED BANCSHARES, INC.
(exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
OHIO 34-1516518
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer I.D. No.)
incorporation or organization)
100 S. High Street, Columbus Grove, Ohio 45830
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (419) 659-2141
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, no par value
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes No X
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No X
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
Indicated by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ___.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ____ Accelerated filer ____ Non-accelerated filer X
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, i.e., persons other than the directors and executive officers of the registrant, was $48,495,818, based upon the last sales price as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market as of June 30, 2005.
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of January 31, 2006: 3,625,535.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2005 are incorporated by reference into Part II. Portions of the Proxy Statement dated March 22, 2006 for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
1
INDEX
Part I Item 1. Item1A. | Business Risk Factors | Page(s) 3 23 24-30 |
Item 2. | Properties | 31 |
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 31 |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 31 |
Part II Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 33 |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 33 |
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 33 |
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 33 |
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 33 |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 34 |
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 34 |
Item 9B. | Other Information | 34 |
Part III Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant | 35 |
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 35 |
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 35 |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | 35 |
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 35 |
Part IV Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 36 |
Signatures | 37 |
2
PART I
Item 1.
Business
General
United Bancshares, Inc. (the Corporation), an Ohio corporation, is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve Board). The Corporation was incorporated and organized in 1985. The executive offices of the Corporation are located at 100 S. High Street, Columbus Grove, Ohio 45830. As of December 31, 2005, the Corporation employed approximately 162 employees. On March 7, 2003, following the receipt of approval from the appropriate regulatory authorities, the Corporation collapsed the charters of Citizens Bank of Delphos and the Bank of Leipsic and merged them into the charter of The Union Bank Company (the Bank). Following the merger of the Corporations other two bank subsidiaries into The Union Bank Company, the Corporation is now a one-bank holding company, as that term is defined by the Federal Reserve Board.
United Bancshares, Inc. has traded its common stock on the Nasdaq Markets Exchange under the symbol UBOH since March 2001. From January 2000 to March 2001, the Corporations common stock was traded on the Nasdaq Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board.
The Corporation is registered as a Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act) reporting company.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain matters disclosed herein may be deemed to be forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including regulatory policy changes, interest rate fluctuations, loan demand, loan delinquencies and losses, and other risks. Actual strategies and results in future time periods may differ materially from those currently expected. Such forward-looking statements represent managements judgment as of the current date. The Corporation disclaims, however, any intent or obligation to update such forward-looking statements.
General Description of Bank Subsidiary and Recent Acquisition
The Union Bank Company acquired branches from RFC Banking Company, effective March 28, 2003. Since the acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, only the operations of the branches subsequent to March 28, 2003 are included in the Corporations consolidated financial information.
The Bank is engaged in the business of commercial banking. The Bank is an Ohio state-chartered bank, which serves Allen, Putnam, Sandusky, Van Wert and Wood Counties, with office locations in Bowling Green, Columbus Grove, Delphos, Gibsonburg, Kalida, Leipsic, Lima, Ottawa, and Pemberville.
The Bank offers a full range of commercial banking services, including checking accounts, savings and money market accounts; time certificates of deposit; automatic teller machines; commercial, consumer, agricultural, residential mortgage loans and home equity loans; credit card services; safe deposit box rentals; and other personalized banking services.
3
Competition
The Corporation competes for deposits with other savings associations, commercial banks and credit unions and issuers of commercial paper and other securities, such as shares in money market mutual funds. Primary factors in competing for deposits include customer service, interest rates and convenience of office location. In making loans, the Corporation competes with other commercial banks, savings associations, consumer finance companies, credit unions, leasing companies, mortgage companies and other lenders. Competition is affected by, among other things, the general availability of lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current interest rate levels and other factors that are not readily predictable. The number of financial institutions competing with the Corporation is likely to increase as a result of changes in statutes and regulations eliminating various restrictions on interstate and inter-industry branching and acquisitions. Such increased competition may have an adverse effect upon the Corporation.
Effect of Environmental Regulation
Compliance with federal, state and local provision regulating the discharge of material into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has not had a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Corporation and its subsidiary. The Corporation believes that the nature of the operations of its subsidiary has little, if any, environmental impact. The Corporation, therefore, anticipates no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities for its current fiscal year or for the foreseeable future. The Corporations subsidiary may be required to make capital expenditures for environmental control facilities related to properties, which they may acquire through foreclosure proceedings in the future; however, the amount of such capital expenditures, if any, is not currently determinable.
Supervision and Regulation
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the SOA). The stated goals of the SOA are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties within publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws.
The SOA is the most far-reaching U.S. securities legislation enacted in some time. The SOA generally applies to all companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., that file or are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Given the extensive SEC role in implementing rules relating to many of the SOAs new requirements, the final scope of these requirements remains to be determined.
The SOA includes very specific additional disclosure requirements and new corporate governance rules, requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules and mandates further studies of certain issues by the SEC and the Comptroller General. The SOA represents significant federal involvement in matters traditionally left to state regulatory systems, including the regulation of the accounting profession, and to state corporate law, such as the relationship between a board of directors and management and between a board of directors and its committees.
4
The SOA addresses, among other matters:
*
audit committees for all reporting companies;
*
certification of financial statements by the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer;
*
the forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the sale of an issuers securities by directors and senior officers in the twelve month period following initial publication of any financial statements that later require restatement;
*
a prohibition on insider trading during pension plan black out periods;
*
disclosure of off-balance sheet transactions;
*
a prohibition on personal loans to directors and officers;
*
expedited filing requirements for Forms 4;
*
disclosure of a code of ethics and filing a Form 8-K for a change or waiver of such code;
*
real time filing of periodic reports;
*
the formation of a public company accounting oversight board;
*
auditor independence; and
*
various increased criminal penalties for violations of securities laws.
The SOA contains provisions, which became effective upon enactment on July 30, 2002 and provisions which will become effective from within 30 days to one or more years from enactment. The SEC has been delegated the task of enacting rules to implement various provisions with respect to, among other matters, disclosure in periodic filings pursuant to the Exchange Act.
Other Statutes and Regulations
The following is a summary of certain other statutes and regulations affecting the Corporation and its subsidiary. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statutes and regulations.
The Corporation is a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, which restricts the activities of the Corporation and the acquisition by the Corporation of voting shares or assets of any bank, savings association or other company. The Corporation is also subject to the reporting requirements of, and examination and regulation by, the Federal Reserve Board. Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on transactions with affiliates, including any loans or extensions of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, investments in the stock or other securities thereof and the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans or extensions of credit to any borrower; the issuance of guarantees, acceptances or letters of credit on behalf of the bank holding company and its subsidiary; purchases or sales of securities or other assets; and the payment of money or furnishing of services to the bank holding company and other subsidiaries. Bank holding companies are prohibited from acquiring direct or indirect control of more than 5% of any class of voting stock or substantially all of the assets of any bank holding company without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. A bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with extensions of credit and/or the provision of other property or services to a customer by the bank holding company or its subsidiaries.
5
As an Ohio state-chartered bank, the Bank is supervised and regulated by the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC and the Bank is subject to the applicable provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. A subsidiary of a bank holding company can be liable to reimburse the FDIC if the FDIC incurs or anticipates a loss because of a default of another FDIC-insured subsidiary of the bank holding company or in connection with FDIC assistance provided to such subsidiary in danger of default. In addition, the holding company of any insured financial institution that submits a capital plan under the federal banking agencies regulations on prompt corrective action guarantees a portion of the institutions capital shortfall, as discussed below.
Various requirements and restrictions under the laws of the United States and the State of Ohio affect the operations of the Bank, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the nature and amount of loans which may be made and the interest that may be charged thereon, restrictions relating to investments and other activities, limitations on credit exposure to correspondent banks, limitations on activities based on capital and surplus, limitations on payment of dividends, and limitations on branching.
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition and a framework for calculating risk weighted assets by assigning assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. The minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) is 8%. At least 4% is to be comprised of common Shareholders equity (including retained earnings but excluding treasury stock), noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock, and minority interest in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (Tier 1 capital). The remainder (Tier 2 capital) may consist, among other things, of mandatory convertible debt securities, a limited amount of subordinated debt, other preferred stock and a limited amount of allowance for loan losses. The Federal Reserve Board also imposes a minimum leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to total assets) of 3% for bank holding companies and state member banks that meet certain specified conditions, including having the highest regulatory rating. The minimum leverage ratio is 1%-2% higher for other bank holding companies and state member banks based on their particular circumstances and risk profiles and for those banks experiencing or anticipating significant growth. State non-member bank subsidiaries, such as the Bank are subject to similar capital requirements adopted by the FDIC.
The Corporation and its subsidiary currently satisfy all capital requirements. Failure to meet applicable capital guidelines could subject a banking institution to a variety of enforcement remedies available to federal and state regulatory authorities, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC. The trust preferred securities issued in 2003, as described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Corporations Annual Report, currently qualify as Tier I capital for regulatory purposes. However, it is possible that regulations could change so that such securities do not qualify.
The federal banking regulators have established regulations governing prompt corrective action to resolve capital deficient banks. Under these regulations, institutions, which become undercapitalized, become subject to mandatory regulatory scrutiny and limitations that increase as capital decreases. Such institutions are also required to file capital plans with their primary federal regulator, and their holding companies must guarantee the capital shortfall up to 5% of the assets of the capital deficient institution at the time it becomes undercapitalized.
6
The ability of a bank holding company to obtain funds for the payment of dividends and for other cash requirements is largely dependent on the amount of dividends that may be declared by its subsidiary bank and other subsidiaries. However, the Federal Reserve Board expects the Corporation to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary bank, which may require it to retain capital for further investment in the subsidiary, rather than for dividends for shareholders of the Corporation. The Bank may not pay dividends to the Corporation if, after paying such dividends, it would fail to meet the required minimum levels under the risk-based capital guidelines and the minimum leverage ratio requirements. The Bank must have the approval of its regulatory authorities if a dividend in any year would cause the total dividends for that year to exceed the sum of the current years net income and the retained net income for the preceding two years, less required transfers to surplus. Payment of dividends by a bank subsidiary may be restricted at any time at the discretion of the regulatory authorities, if they deem such dividends to constitute an unsafe and/or unsound banking practice. These provisions could have the effect of limiting the Corporations ability to pay dividends on its outstanding common shares.
Deposit Insurance Assessments and Recent Legislation
The FDIC is authorized to establish separate annual assessment rates for deposit insurance for members of the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF), of which The Union Bank Company is a member. The FDIC may increase assessment rates for the fund if necessary to restore the funds ratio of reserves to insured deposits to its target level within a reasonable time and may decrease such rates if such target level has been met. The FDIC has established a risk-based assessment system for BIF members. Under this system, assessments vary based on the risk the institution poses to its deposit insurance fund. The risk level is determined based on the institutions capital level and the FDICs level of supervisory concern about the institution.
Monetary Policy and Economic Conditions
The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the policies of various governmental regulatory authorities, including the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board regulates money and credit conditions and interest rates in order to influence general economic conditions primarily through open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the discount rate on bank borrowings and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These policies and regulations significantly affect the overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and the interest rates charged on loans as well as the interest rates paid on deposits and accounts.
The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to have significant effects in the future. In view of the changing conditions in the economy and the money market and the activities of monetary and fiscal authorities, no definitive predictions can be made as to future changes in interest rates, credit availability or deposit level.
7
Statistical Financial Information Regarding the Corporation
The following schedules and table analyze certain elements of the consolidated balance sheets and statements of income of the Corporation and its subsidiary, as required under Securities Act Industry Guide 3 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with the narrative analysis presented in ITEM 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation.
Available Information
The Corporation files various reports with the SEC, including forms 10-Q, 10-K, 11-K and 8-K as required. The public may read and copy any filed materials with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that the Corporation electronically files with the SEC.
Various information on the Corporation may also be obtained from the Corporations maintained website at http://www.theubank.com.
8
I.
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
A.
The following are the average balance sheets for the years ended December 31:
(1)
Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value. The average balance includes quarterly average balances of the market value adjustments and daily average balances for the amortized cost of securities.
(2)
Loan balances include principal balances of non-accrual loans and loans held for sale
(3)
Shareholders equity includes average net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on securities available-for-sale, net of tax.
9
I.
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (CONTINUED)
B.
The following tables set forth, for the years indicated, the condensed average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the interest earned or paid on such amounts, and the average interest rates earned or paid thereon.
2005 Average Balance | Interest | Average Rate | |
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS | (dollars in thousands) | ||
Securities available-for-sale (1) | |||
Taxable | $162,044 | $ 7,264 | 4.48% |
Non-taxable (2) | 38,859 | 2,410 | 6.20% |
Federal Home Loan Bank deposits | 733 | 22 | 3.00% |
Federal funds sold | 2,925 | 93 | 3.18% |
Loans (3, 4) | 311,107 | 21,106 | 6.78% |
Total interest-earning assets | $515,668 | $30,895 | 5.99% |
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES | |||
Deposits | |||
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits | $124,728 | $1,240 | 0.99% |
Time deposits | 206,381 | 5,119 | 2.48% |
Federal funds purchased | 99 | 4 | 4.04% |
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures | 10,300 | 640 | 6.21% |
Long-term debt | 125,978 | 4,977 | 3.95% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $467,486 | $11,980 | 2.56% |
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis | $ 18,915 ====== | ||
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets | 3.67% ===== |
(1)
Securities, available-for-sale are carried at fair value. The average balance includes quarterly average balances of the market value adjustments and daily average balances for the amortized cost of securities.
(2)
Computed on tax equivalent basis for non-taxable securities (34% statutory rate).
(3)
Loan balances include principal balance of non-accrual loans and loans held for sale.
(4)
Interest income on loans includes fees on loans of $1,035,557
10
I.
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (CONTINUED)
2004 Average Balance | Interest | Average Rate | |
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS | (dollars in thousands) | ||
Securities available-for-sale (1) | |||
Taxable | $141,107 | $ 5,778 | 4.09% |
Non-taxable (2) | 54,337 | 3,305 | 6.08% |
Federal Home Loan Bank deposits | 892 | 7 | 0.78% |
Federal funds sold | 1,470 | 24 | 1.63% |
Loans (3, 4) | 297,732 | 19,003 | 6.38% |
Total interest-earning assets | $495,538 | $28,117 | 5.67% |
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES | |||
Deposits | |||
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits | $127,199 | $735 | 0.58% |
Time deposits | 218,962 | 5,403 | 2.47% |
Federal funds purchased | 56 | 1 | 1.79% |
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures | 10,300 | 640 | 6.21% |
Long-term debt | 91,046 | 3,555 | 3.90% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $447,563 | $10,334 | 2.31% |
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis | $ 17,783 ====== | ||
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets | 3.59% ===== |
(1)
Securities, available-for-sale are carried at fair value. The average balance includes quarterly average balances of the market value adjustments and daily average balances for the amortized cost of securities.
(2)
Computed on tax equivalent basis for non-taxable securities (34% statutory rate).
(3)
Loan balances include principal balance of non-accrual loans and loans held for sale.
(4)
Interest income on loans includes fees on loans of $1,147,934.
11
I.
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (CONTINUED)
2003 Average Balance | Interest | Average Rate | |
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS | (dollars in thousands) | ||
Securities available-for-sale (1) | |||
Taxable | $118,575 | $ 4,470 | 3.77% |
Non-taxable (2) | 42,947 | 2,720 | 6.33% |
Federal Home Loan Bank deposits | 2,751 | 41 | 1.49% |
Federal funds sold | 6,139 | 42 | 0.68% |
Loans (3, 4) | 280,303 | 18,428 | 6.57% |
Total interest-earning assets | $450,715 | $25,701 | 5.70% |
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES | |||
Deposits | |||
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits | 108,890 | 1,044 | 0.96% |
Time deposits | 231,006 | 6,167 | 2.67% |
Federal funds purchased | 2,127 | 21 | 0.99% |
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures | 7,500 | 480 | 6.40% |
Advances from FHLB | 54,621 | 2,355 | 4.31% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $404,144 | $10,067 | 2.49% |
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis | $ 15,634 ====== | ||
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets | 3.47% ===== |
(1)
Securities, available-for-sale are carried at fair value. The average balance includes quarterly average balances of the market value adjustments and daily average balances for the amortized cost of securities.
(2)
Computed on tax equivalent basis for non-taxable securities (34% statutory rate).
(3)
Loan balances include principal balance of non-accrual loans and loans held for sale.
(4)
Interest income on loans includes fees on loans of $1,184,616.
12
I.
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (CONTINUED)
C.
The following tables set forth the effect of volume and rate changes on interest income and expenses for the periods indicated. For purposes of these tables, changes in interest due to volume and rate were determined as follows:
Volume variance - change in volume multiplied by the previous years rate.
Rate variance - change in rate multiplied by the previous years volume.
Rate/volume variance - change in volume multiplied by the change in rate.
This variance was allocated to volume variances and rate variances in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of the change in each.
Interest on non-taxable securities has been adjusted to a fully tax equivalent basis using a statutory tax rate of 34% in all years presented.
2005/2004_______ | |||||
Total Variance | Variance Attributable To Volume Rate | ||||
INTEREST INCOME | (dollars in thousands) | ||||
Securities - | |||||
Taxable | $ 1,486 | $ 907 | $ 579 | ||
Non-taxable | (895) | (961) | 66 | ||
Federal Home Loan Bank deposits | 15 | (1) | 16 | ||
Federal funds sold | 69 | 35 | 34 | ||
Loans | 2,103 | 876 | 1,227 | ||
2,778 | 856 | 1,922 | |||
INTEREST EXPENSE | |||||
Deposits - | |||||
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits | 505 | (14) | 519 | ||
Time deposits | (284) | (312) | 28 | ||
Federal funds purchased | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||
Junior Subordinated deferrable interest debentures | -- | -- | -- | ||
Long-term debt | 1,422 | 1,381 | 41 | ||
1,646 | 1,056 | 590 | |||
NET INTEREST INCOME | $ 1,132 ===== | $ (200) ===== | $ 1,332 ===== |
13
I.
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (CONTINUED)
2004/2003_________ | |||||
Total Variance | Variance Attributable To Volume Rate | ||||
INTEREST INCOME | (dollars in thousands) | ||||
Securities - | |||||
Taxable | $ 1,308 | $ 900 | $ 408 | ||
Non-taxable | 585 | 688 | (103) | ||
Federal Home Loan Bank deposits | (34) | (20) | (14) | ||
Federal funds sold | (18) | (76) | 58 | ||
Loans | 575 | 1,112 | (537) | ||
2,416 | 2,604 | (188) | |||
INTEREST EXPENSE | |||||
Deposits - | |||||
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits | (309) | 227 | (536) | ||
Time deposits | (764) | (312) | (452) | ||
Federal funds purchased | (20) | (118) | 98 | ||
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures | 160 | 174 | (14) | ||
Long-term debt | 1,200 | 1,398 | (198) | ||
267 | 1,369 | (1,102) | |||
NET INTEREST INCOME | $ 2,149 ===== | $ 1,235 ===== | $ 914 ===== |
14
II.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
A.
The carrying amount of securities available-for-sale as of December 31 are summarized as follows:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities | $28,877 | $ 24,904 | $ 21,769 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | 42,357 | 44,431 | 66,246 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | 112,022 | 144,229 | 82,436 | |
Other | 53 | 53 | 53 | |
$183,309 ======= | $213,617 ======= | $170,504 ======= |
The above excludes Federal Home Loan Bank stock amounting to $4,439,600 in 2005, $4,224,400 in 2004 and $4,054,700 in 2003.
B.
The maturity distribution and weighted average yield of securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2005 are as follows:
Maturing | ||||
Within One Year | After One year But Within Five Years | After Five Years But Within Ten Years | After Ten Years | |
(dollars in thousands) | ||||
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities | $ 0 | $ 25,983 | $ 2,894 | $ 0 |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | 349 | 11,265 | 20,755 | 9,988 |
Mortgage-backed securities (1) | 465 | 94,504 | 16,050 | 1,003 |
$ 814 ===== | $131,752 ====== | $ 39,699 ====== | $ 10,991 ====== | |
Weighted average yield | 5.50% ===== | 4.71% ====== | 5.09% ======= | 6.17% ======= |
(1)
Maturity based upon estimated weighted-average life.
(2)
Table excludes Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $53,000 of securities having no maturity date.
The weighted average interest rates are based on coupon rates for securities purchased at par value and on effective interest rates considering amortization or accretion if the securities were purchased at a premium or discount.
C.
Excluding those holdings in the investment portfolio of U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities, there were four securities which exceeded 10% of Shareholders equity at December 31, 2005. One security was a variable rate collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO) with a $9,329,000 book value as of December 31, 2005. The other three securities were variable rate mortgage-backed securities (MBS) with the following book values as of December 31, 2005: $11,642,000, $12,160,000, and $15,805,000.
15
III.
LOAN PORTFOLIO
A.
Types of Loans Total loans, including loans held for sale, are comprised of the following classifications at December 31 for the years indicated:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||
Commercial and agricultural | $172,840 | $ 172,818 | $ 167,423 | $ 132,148 | $ 108,707 | |
Real estate mortgage | 108,252 | 112,786 | 108,180 | 98,425 | 119,579 | |
Consumer loans to individuals | 28,913 | 20,987 | 16,618 | 12,982 | 15,709 | |
$ 310,005 ======= | $ 306,591 ======= | $ 292,221 ======= | $ 243,555 ======= | $ 243,995 ======= |
Real estate mortgage amounts include real estate construction loans of $13.9 million in 2005, $14.6 million in 2004, $10.2 million in 2003, $4.9 million in 2002, and $7.5 million in 2001. There is no lease financing receivables in any year.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK The Corporations depository institution subsidiary grants commercial, real estate, installment, and credit card loans to customers primarily located in Northwestern Ohio. Commercial loans include loans collateralized by business assets and agricultural loans collateralized by crops and farm equipment. As of December 31, 2005 commercial and agricultural loans make up approximately 55.75% of the loan portfolio; the loans are expected to be repaid from cash flow from operations of the businesses. As of December 31, 2005, real estate mortgage loans make up approximately 34.92% of the loan portfolio and are collateralized by first mortgages on residential real estate. As of December 31, 2005, consumer loans to individuals make up approximately 9.33% of the loan portfolio and are primarily collateralized by consumer assets.
B.
Maturities and Sensitivities of Loans to Changes in Interest Rates The following table shows the amounts of commercial and agricultural loans outstanding as of December 31, 2005 which, based on remaining scheduled repayments of principal, are due in the periods indicated. Also, the amounts have been classified according to sensitivity to changes in interest rates for commercial and agricultural loans due after one year. (Variable-rate loans are those loans with floating or adjustable interest rates.)
Maturing | Commercial and Agricultural | ||
(dollars in thousands) | |||
Within one year | $ 30,739 | ||
After one year but within five years | 25,246 | ||
After five years | 116,855 | ||
$ 172,840 ======= |
16
III.
LOAN PORTFOLIO (CONTINUED)
Interest Sensitivity | |||
Fixed Rate | Variable Rate | Total | |
(dollars in thousands) | |||
Due after one year but within five years | $ 8,932 | $ 16,314 | $ 25,246 |
Due after five years | 7,955 | 108,900 | 116,855 |
$ 16,887 ====== | $ 125,214 ====== | $ 142,101 ======= |
C.
Risk Elements Non-accrual, Past Due, Restructured and Impaired Loans The following table summarizes non-accrual, past due, restructured and impaired loans at December 31:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |
(dollars in thousands) | |||||
(a) Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis | $2,360 | $ 2,135 | $ 1,625 | $ 1,288 | $ 665 |
(b) Accruing loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments and are still accruing interest | 906 | 707 | 1,207 | 410 | 836 |
(c) Loans not included in (a) or (b) which are "Troubled Debt Restructurings" as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
$3,266 ===== | $2,842 ===== | $2,832 ===== | $1,698 ===== | $1,501 ===== |
Management believes the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2005 is adequate to absorb any losses on non-performing loans, as the allowance balance is maintained by management at a level considered adequate to cover losses that are currently anticipated based on past loss experience, general economic conditions, information about specific borrower situations including their financial position and collateral values, and other factors and estimates which are subject to change over time.
17
III.
LOAN PORTFOLIO (CONTINUED)
The following is reported for the year ended December 31, 2005:
2005 (dollars in thousands) | |
Gross interest income that would have been recorded in 2005 on non- accrual loans outstanding at December 31, 2005 if the loans had been current, in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period | $ 179 |
Interest income actually recorded on non-accrual loans and included in net income for the period | 47 |
Interest income not recognized during the period | $ 132 ====== |
1.
Discussion of the non-accrual policy
The accrual of interest income is discontinued when the collection of a loan or interest, in whole or in part, is doubtful. When the accrual of interest is discontinued, all interest income accrued but uncollected is reversed. While loans which are past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments are considered for non-accrual status, management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when the estimated net realizable value of collateral, in managements judgment, is sufficient to cover the principal balance and accrued interest. These policies apply to both commercial and real estate loans.
2.
Potential problem loans
As of December 31, 2005, in addition to the $3,266,000 of loans reported under Item III. C, there are approximately $10,215,000 in other outstanding loans where known information causes management to have doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may result in disclosure of such loans pursuant to Item III. C, at some future date. Consideration was given to loans classified for regulatory purposes as loss, doubtful, substandard, or special mention that have not been disclosed in Item III. C above. To the extent that such loans are not included in the $10,215,000 in potential problem loans described above, management believes that such loans will not materially impact future operating results, liquidity, or capital resources.
3.
Foreign outstandings
None
4.
Loan concentrations
At December 31, 2005, loans outstanding relating to agricultural operations or collateralized by agricultural real estate aggregated approximately $50,399,000. At December 31, 2005, there were $360,000 in agricultural commercial loans, which were accounted for on a non-accrual basis; and there were $76,000 accruing agricultural commercial loans which were contractually past due ninety days or more as to interest or principal payments.
D.
Other interest-bearing assets
As of December 31, 2005, there were no other interest-bearing assets that are required to be disclosed.
18
IV.
SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
A.
The following schedule presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses, average loan data and related ratios for the years ended December 31:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |
LOANS | (dollars in thousands) | ||||
Loans outstanding at end of period (1) | $ 310,005 ======= | $ 306,591 ======= | $ 292,221 ======= | $ 243,555 ======= | $ 243,995 ======= |
Average loans outstanding during period | $ 311,107 ======= | $ 297,732 ======= | $ 280,303 ======= | $ 242,688 ======= | $ 264,243 ======= |
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES | |||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ 2,757 | $ 2,768 | $ 2,785 | $ 2,592 | $ 1,936 |
Addition of allowance for acquired subsidiary - Citizens Bank of Delphos | -- | -- | -- | -- | 721 |
Loans charged off - Commercial and agricultural | (638) | (530) | (82) | (149) | (113) |
Real estate mortgage | (66) | (116) | (362) | (215) | (83) |
Consumer loans to individuals | (265) | (203) | (211) | (291) | (379) |
(969) | (849) | (655) | (655) | (575) | |
Recoveries of loans previously charged off - | |||||
Commercial and agricultural | 52 | 91 | 9 | 23 | -- |
Real estate mortgage | 31 | 34 | 107 | 17 | 13 |
Consumer loans to individuals | 128 | 136 | 72 | 86 | 48 |
211 | 261 | 188 | 126 | 61 | |
Net loans charged off | (758) | (588) | (467) | (529) | (514) |
Transfer to other Liabilities | (71) | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Provision for loan losses | 612 | 577 | 450 | 722 | 449 |
Balance at end of period | $2,540 ===== | $ 2,757 ===== | $ 2,768 ===== | $ 2,785 ===== | $ 2,592 ===== |
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period | 0.24% ===== | 0.20% ===== | 0.17% ===== | 0.22% ===== | 0.19% ===== |
(1)
Including loans held for sale.
The allowance for loan losses balance and the provision for loan losses are judgmentally determined by management based upon periodic reviews of the loan portfolio. In addition, management considered the level of charge-offs on loans as well as the fluctuations of charge-offs and recoveries on loans including the factors, which caused these changes. Estimating the risk of loans and the amount of loss is necessarily subjective. Accordingly, the allowance is maintained by management at a level considered adequate to cover losses that are currently anticipated based on past loss experience, general economic conditions, information about specific borrower situations including their financial position and collateral value and other factors and estimates which are subject to change over time.
19
IV.
SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE (CONTINUED)
B.
The following schedule is a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses allocated by type of loan and related ratios.
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses | ||||
Allowance Amount | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance Amount | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | |
(dollars in thousands) | ||||
December 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||
Commercial and agricultural | $ 1,395 | 55.8% | $ 1,937 | 56.4% |
Real Estate mortgages | 876 | 34.9% | 543 | 36.8% |
Consumer loans to individuals | 165 | 9.3% | 262 | 6.8% |
Unallocated | 104 | N/A | 15 | N/A |
$ 2,540 ====== | 100.0% ====== | $ 2,757 ====== | 100.0% ====== | |
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | |||
Commercial and agricultural | $ 1,758 | 57.3% | $ 1,465 | 54.3% |
Real Estate mortgages | 469 | 37.0% | 592 | 40.4% |
Consumer loans to individuals | 399 | 5.7% | 581 | 5.3% |
Unallocated | 142 | N/A | 147 | N/A |
$ 2,768 ====== | 100.0% ====== | $ 2,785 ====== | 100.0% ====== | |
December 31, 2001 | ||||
Commercial and agricultural | $ 1,288 | 44.6% | ||
Real Estate mortgages | 617 | 49.0% | ||
Consumer loans to individuals | 383 | 6.4% | ||
Unallocated | 304 | N/A | ||
$ 2,592 ====== | 100.0% ====== |
While managements periodic analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses may allocate portions of the allowance for specific problem loan situations, the entire allowance is available for any loan charge-offs that occur.
20
V.
DEPOSITS
A.&B.
The average amount of deposits and average rates paid are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:
(dollars in thousands) | ||||
2005 Average Amount | 2005 Average Rate | 2004 Average Amount | 2004 Average Rate | |
Savings and interest- bearing demand deposits | $ 124,728 | 0.99% | $ 127,199 | 0.58% |
Time deposits | 206,381 | 2.48% | 218,962 | 2.47% |
Demand deposits (non-interest bearing) | 34,033 | -- | 32,324 | -- |
$ 365,142 ======= | $ 378,485 ======= | |||
2003 Average Amount | 2003 Average Rate | |||
Savings and interest- bearing demand deposits | $ 108,890 | .96% | ||
Time deposits | 231,006 | 2.67% | ||
Demand deposits (non-interest bearing) | 26,440 | -- | ||
$ 366,336 ======= |
C.&E.
There were no foreign deposits in any periods presented
D.
Maturities of time certificates of deposit and other time deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2005 are summarized as follows:
Three months or less | $ 5,812 |
Over three months and through six months | 3,016 |
Over six months and through twelve months | 11,678 |
Over twelve months | 8,030 |
$28,536 ====== |
21
VI.
RETURN ON EQUITY AND ASSETS
The ratio of net income to average shareholders equity and average total assets and certain other ratios are as follows:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |
(dollars in thousands) | |||
Average total assets | $ 548,463 ======= | $ 526,065 ======= | $ 478,518 ======= |
Average shareholders' equity (1) | $ 44,208 ======= | $ 43,250 ======= | $ 42,005 ======= |
Net income | $ 4,622 ======= | $ 3,088 ======= | $ 3,691 ======= |
Cash dividends declared | $ 1,760 ======= | $ 1,617 ======= | $ 1,606 ======= |
Return on average total assets | 0.84% ===== | 0.59% ===== | 0.77% ===== |
Return on average shareholders' equity | 10.46% ===== | 7.14% ===== | 8.79% ===== |
Dividend payout ratio (2) | 38.08% ===== | 52.36% ===== | 43.51% ===== |
Average shareholders' equity to average total assets | 8.06% ===== | 8.22% ===== | 8.78% ===== |
(1)
Average Shareholders equity includes average unrealized appreciation or depreciation on securities available-for-sale.
(2)
Dividends declared divided by net income.
VII.
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
None
22
Item 1A.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the Corporations common stock is subject to risks inherent to the Corporations business. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Corporation are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Corporation. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair the Corporations business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.
If any of the following risks actually occur, the Corporations financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of the Corporations common stock could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to the Corporations Business
The Corporation is Subject to Interest Rate Risk
The Corporations earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the Corporations control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest the Corporation receives on loans and securities and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) the Corporations ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of the Corporations financial assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of the Corporations mortgage-backed securities portfolio. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, the Corporations net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings.
Although management believes it has implemented effective asset and liability management strategies, to reduce the potential effects of changes in interest rates on the Corporations results of operations, any substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporation Is Subject To Lending Risk
There are inherent risks associated with the Corporations lending activities. These risks include, among other things, the impact of changes in interest rates and changes in the economic conditions in the markets where the Corporation operates as well as those across the State of Ohio and the United States. Increases in interest rates and/or weakening economic conditions could adversely impact the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans or the value of the collateral securing these loans. The Corporation is also subject to various laws and regulations that affect its lending activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject the Corporation to regulatory enforcement action that could result in the assessment of significant civil monetary penalties against the Corporation.
Although the Corporation does not have an inordinately large number of non-performing loans, an increase in non-performing loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for possible loans losses and an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporations Allowance for Loan Losses May Be Insufficient
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, that represents managements best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of the allowance reflects managements continuing evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; current loan portfolio quality; present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires the Corporation to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of the Corporations control, may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Corporations allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for loan losses, the Corporation will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for loan losses. Any increases in the allowance for loan losses will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly, capital, and may have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporation Is Subject To Environmental Liability Risk Associated With Lending Activities
A significant portion of the Corporations loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, the Corporation may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, the Corporation may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require the Corporation to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected propertys value or limit the Corporations ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase the Corporations exposure to environmental liability. Although the Corporation may perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporations Profitability Depends Significantly on Economic Conditions in the State of Ohio
The Corporations success depends primarily on the general economic conditions of the State of Ohio and the specific local markets in which the Corporation operates. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, the Corporation provides banking and financial services to customers primarily in Allen, Putnam, Wood, Sandusky and Van Wert counties. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for the Corporations products and services as well as the ability of the Corporations customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of the Corporations deposit funding sources. A significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic occurrences, unemployment, changes in securities markets or other factors could impact those local economic conditions and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporation Operates in a Highly Competitive Industry and Market Area
The Corporation faces substantial competition in all areas of its operations from a variety of different competitors, many of which are larger and may have more financial resources. Such competitors primarily include national, regional, and community banks within the various markets the Corporation operates. The Corporation also faces competition from many other types of financial institutions, including, without limitation, savings and loans, credit unions, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, factoring companies and other financial intermediaries. The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms and insurance companies can merge under the umbrella of a financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and underwriting) and merchant banking. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Many of the Corporations competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. Additionally, due to their size, many competitors may be able to achieve economies of scale and, as a result, may offer a broader range of products and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than the Corporation can.
The Corporations ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things:
·
The ability to develop, maintain and build upon long-term customer relationships based on top quality service, high ethical standards and safe, sound assets.
·
The ability to expand the Corporations market position.
·
The scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs and demands.
·
The rate at which the Corporation introduces new products and services relative to its competitors.
·
Customer satisfaction with the Corporations level of service.
·
Industry and general economic trends.
Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken the Corporations competitive position, which could adversely affect the Corporations growth and profitability, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporation Is Subject To Extensive Government Regulation And Supervision
The Corporation, primarily through its wholly owned subsidiary, The Union Bank Company, is subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. These regulations affect the Corporations lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect the Corporation in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject the Corporation to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products the Corporation may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputational damage, which could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, financial condition and results of operations. While the Corporation has policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur.
The Corporations Controls and Procedures May Fail or be Circumvented
Management regularly reviews and updates the Corporations internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of the Corporations controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, results of operations and financial condition.
Corporation Relies On Dividends from Its Subsidiaries for Most of Its Revenue
The Corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiary. It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiary. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the Corporations common stock, interest and principal on Uniteds debt, and other operating expenses. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to the Corporation. Also, the Corporations right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiarys liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiarys creditors. In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Corporation, the Corporation may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on the Corporations common stock. The inability to receive dividends from the Bank could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporation May Not Be Able To Attract And Retain Skilled People
The Corporations success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities engaged in by the Corporation can be intense and the Corporation may not be able to hire people or to retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of the Corporations key personnel could have a material adverse impact on the Corporations business because of their skills, knowledge of the Corporations market, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
The Corporations Information Systems May Experience an Interruption or Breach in Security
The Corporation relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in the Corporations customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While the Corporation has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of its information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of the Corporations information systems could damage the Corporations reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject the Corporation to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose the Corporation to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporation Continually Encounters Technological Change
The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. The Corporations future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in the Corporations operations. Many of the Corporations competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. The Corporation may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on the Corporations business and, in turn, the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporation Is Subject To Claims and Litigation Pertaining to Fiduciary Responsibility
From time to time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to the Corporations performance of its fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to the Corporations performance of its fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal action are not resolved in a manner favorable to the Corporation they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of the Corporation and its products and services as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
Severe Weather, Natural Disasters, Acts of War Or Terrorism And Other External Events Could Significantly Impact The Corporations Business
Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on the Corporations ability to conduct business. Such events could affect the stability of the Corporations deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue and/or cause the Corporation to incur additional expenses. Although management has established disaster recovery policies and procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Associated with the Corporations Common Stock
The Corporations Stock Price Can Be Volatile
Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. The Corporations stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:
·
Actual or anticipated variations in quarterly results of operations.
·
Recommendations by securities analysts.
·
Operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Corporation.
·
News reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry.
·
Perceptions in the marketplace regarding the Corporation and/or its competitors.
·
New technology uses, or services offered, by competitors.
·
Significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving the Corporation or its competitors.
·
Failure to integrate acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions.
·
Changes in government regulations.
·
Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.
General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause the Corporations stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.
An Investment in the Corporations Common Stock is NOT an Insured Deposit
The Corporations common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in the Corporations common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this Risk Factors section and elsewhere in this report and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, if you acquire the Corporations common stock, you may lose some or all of your investment.
The Corporations Articles of Incorporation and Regulations as well as Certain Banking Laws may have an Anti-Takeover Effect
Provisions, of the Corporations articles of incorporation and regulations and federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire the Corporation, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial to the Corporations shareholders. The combination of these provisions effectively inhibits a non-negotiated merger or other business combination, which, in turn, could adversely affect the market price of the Corporations common stock.
Risks Associated with the Corporations Industry
The Earnings of Financial Services Companies are significantly affected by General Business and Economic Conditions
The Corporations operations and profitability are impacted by general business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, money supply, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, broad trends in industry and finance, and the strength of the U.S. economy and the local economies in which the Corporation operates, all of which are beyond the Corporations control. Deterioration in economic conditions could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for the Corporations products and services, among other things, any of which could have a material adverse impact on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
Financial Services Companies Depend on the Accuracy and Completeness of Information about Customers and Counterparties
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions, the Corporation may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports and other financial information. The Corporation may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements, credit reports or other financial information could have a material adverse impact on the Corporations business and, in turn, the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
Consumers May Decide Not To Use Banks to Complete their Financial Transactions
Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks through alternative methods. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts or mutual funds. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as disintermediation, could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
23
Item 2.
Properties
The following is a listing and brief description of the properties owned by the Corporation and The Union Bank Company and used in its business:
1.
Its main office is a two-story brick building located at 100 South High Street, Columbus Grove, Ohio. The building was constructed in approximately 1900 and contains approximately 7,870 square feet.
2.
A full service branch office is located at 110 East North Street, Kalida, Ohio. The building was constructed in 1994 and contains approximately 2,540 square feet.
3.
A full service branch office is located at 245 West Main Street, Ottawa, Ohio. The building was constructed in 1991 and contains approximately 2,400 square feet.
4.
A full service branch office is located at 3211 Elida Road, Lima, Ohio. The building was constructed in 1994 and contains approximately 4,000 square feet.
5.
A full service branch office is located at 1410 Bellefontaine Avenue, Lima, Ohio. The building was constructed in 1998 and contains approximately 4,200 square feet.
6.
A drive-thru facility is located at 200 East Sycamore Street, Columbus Grove, Ohio. The building was constructed in 1973 and contains approximately 480 square feet.
7.
Two buildings located at 102 & 106 South High Street, Columbus Grove, Ohio were constructed in approximately 1930. They are both two-story buildings and together contain approximately 9,700 square feet. These facilities are used to house the operation areas of the subsidiary.
8.
A full service branch office is located at 215 West Market Street, Lima, Ohio. The building was constructed in approximately 1954 and contains approximately 5,700 square feet. The building was acquired in 2000.
9.
A full service branch office is located at 318 South Belmore Street, Leipsic, Ohio was opened on December 24, 2001.
10.
A full service branch office is located at 114 East 3rd Street, Delphos, Ohio. The building was acquired as part of the Citizens Bank of Delphos Acquisition in 2001.
11.
A full service branch office located at 140 Front Street, Pemberville, Ohio. The building was acquired as part of the RFCBC branch Acquisition in March 2003.
12.
A full service branch office located at 230 West Main Street, Gibsonburg, Ohio. The building was acquired as part of the RFCBC branch Acquisition in March 2003.
In addition to the aforementioned properties, The Union Bank Company leases approximately 2,000 square feet of office space at 1204 West Wooster Street, Bowling Green, Ohio. The property is operated as a full-service banking center.
All of the properties are suitable for their intended use.
24
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Corporation or its subsidiary are a party or to which any of their property is subject except routine legal proceedings to which the Corporation or its subsidiary are a party incident to its banking business. None of such proceedings are considered by the Corporation to be material.
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matter was submitted to a vote of shareholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2005.
25
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There were approximately 1,619 shareholders of record as of January 31, 2006.
The table below includes certain information regarding the Corporations repurchase of United Bancshares, Inc. common stock during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005:
Total number
Maximum number
shares purchased
of shares that may
Total number
Average
as part of publicly
yet be purchased
of shares
price paid
announced plan
under the plan
Period
purchased(a)
per share(c)
or program
or program(b)
10/1/05 -
10/31/05
None
None
None
20,619
11/01/05 -
11/30/05
10,000
$15.10
10,000
110,619
12/1/05
12/31/05
None
None
None
110,619
(a) All share purchases were part of a publicly announced plan and all were open-market transactions.
(b) A stock repurchase program (Plan) was announced on July 29, 2005 and expanded on December 23, 2005. The Plan authorizes the Corporation to repurchase up to 200,000 shares of the Corporations shares from time to time in a program of market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions as the securities laws and market conditions permit.
(c) Exclude related brokerage fees.
Additional information required herein is incorporated by reference from (Market Price and Dividends on Common Stock) United Bancshares Annual Report to Shareholders for 2005 (Annual Report), which is included herein as Exhibit 13.
Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights. | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance. |
| (a) | (b) | (c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 39,446 | $11.18 | 68,603 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | --- | --- | --- |
Total | 39,446 | $11.18 | 68,603 |
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
The information required herein is incorporated by reference from (Five Year Summary of Selected Financial Data) United Bancshares Annual Report to Shareholders for 2005 (Annual Report), which is included herein as Exhibit 13.
Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The information required herein is incorporated by reference from pages 4 through 12 (Managements Discussion and Analysis) of United Bancshares Annual Report to Shareholders for 2005 (Annual Report), which is included herein as Exhibit 13.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information required herein is incorporated by reference from page 12 (Managements Discussion and Analysis) of United Bancshares Annual Report to Shareholders for 2005 (Annual Report), which is included herein as Exhibit 13.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The information required herein is incorporated by reference from page 14 through 45 of United Bancshares Annual Report to Shareholders for 2005 (Annual Report), which is included herein as Exhibit 13.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporations chief executive officer and its chief financial officer are charged with making an evaluation of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures. These controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports mandated by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, communicated to management, and accurately reported within the required time periods. Based upon such evaluation, the Corporations chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. There have been no significant changes during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 in the Corporations internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Exchange Act) or in other factors that could significantly affect the controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None.
26
PART III
Item 10.
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information required herein concerning Directors and Executive Officers is contained under the captions Election of Directors and Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporations definitive proxy statement dated March 22, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this item concerning the Corporations Audit Committee is contained under the caption Audit Committee Report of the Corporations proxy statement dated March 22, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this item concerning the Corporations procedures for the nomination of Directors is contained under the caption Committees of the Board of Directors in the Corporations definitive proxy statement dated March 22, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this item concerning compliance with section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is contained under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Corporations definitive proxy statement dated March 22, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
On February 17, 2004, the Corporation adopted a Code of Ethics that is applicable to all employees of the Corporation, including the Corporations principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, which is incorporated herein by reference to the Corporations 2004 form 10K/A filed August 5, 2005.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
The information required herein concerning Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporation is contained under the caption Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers in the Corporations definitive proxy statement dated March 22, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required herein is contained under the caption Voting Securities in the Corporations definitive proxy statement dated March 22, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
In the ordinary course of conducting its business, the Corporation, for itself or through its bank subsidiary, may engage in transactions with the directors, employees, and managers of the Corporation or of the subsidiary which may include, but not be limited to, loans. As required by and in compliance with Ohio banking law, all banking transactions with directors, employees or managers of the Corporation are conducted on the same basis and terms as would be provided to any other bank customer.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information required by this item is contained under the caption Independent Public Accountants in the Corporations definitive proxy statement dated March 22, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
27
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
1.
Financial Statements
The information required herein is filed as part of this report and is set forth in the United Bancshares Annual Report to Shareholders for 2005 (Annual Report), which is included herein as Exhibit 13.
2.
Financial Statement Schedules -
None.
3.
Exhibits Required by Item 601 Regulations S-K -
The following exhibits are either filed as a part of this report or are incorporated herein by reference to documents previously filed as indicated below:
Exhibit No. | ||
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation | (1) |
3.2 | Regulations | (1) |
10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 13 | Material Contracts Preferred Trust Securities, Placement and Debenture agreements Employment Agreement Daniel W. Schutt Severance Agreement E. Eugene Lehman Agreement Brian D. Young Salary Continuation Agreement - Brian D. Young Executive Supplemental Income Agreement - Bonita Selhorst Annual Report to Shareholders - 2005 | (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) |
14 | Code of Ethics | (2) |
21 | Subsidiaries | (3) |
23 | Consent of Independent Accountants | (3) |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CEO's Certification | (3) |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CFO's Certification | (3) |
32.1 | Section 1350 CEO's Certification | (3) |
32.2 | Section 1350 CFO's Certification | (3) |
99 | Safe Harbor under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 | |
(1) Incorporated herein by reference to the Corporation's Definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Section 14(a) filed March 8, 2002. (2) Incorporated herein by reference to the Corporation's 2004 Form 10K/A filed August 5, 2005. (3) Included herein | ||
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UNITED BANCSHARES, INC. | |
By: /s/ DANIEL W. SCHUTT Daniel W. Schutt, CEO, President | |
By: /s/ BRIAN D. YOUNG Brian D. Young, Chief Financial Officer |
Date: March 21, 2006
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signatures | Title | Date |
/s/ P. DOUGLAS HARTER P. Douglas Harter | Director | March 21, 2006 |
/s/ DANIEL W. SCHUTT Daniel W. Schutt | Director | March 21, 2006 |
/s/ JAMES N. REYNOLDS James N. Reynolds | Director | March 21, 2006 |
/s/ H. EDWARD RIGEL H. Edward Rigel | Director | March 21, 2006 |
/s/ DAVID P. ROACH David P. Roach | Director | March 21, 2006 |
/s/ JOE S. EDWARDS Joe S. Edwards | Director | March 21, 2006 |
/s/R. STEVEN UNVERFERTH R. Steven Unverferth | Director | March 21, 2006 |
/s/ ROBERT L. BENROTH Robert L. Benroth | Director | March 21, 2006 |
/s/ ROBERT L. DILLHOFF Robert L. Dillhoff | Director | March 21, 2006 |
29
Exhibit 21
United Bancshares, Inc. Subsidiaries
The Union Bank Company
Ohio banking corporation
Columbus Grove, Ohio
United (OH) Statutory Trust I
Connecticut statutory trust
Columbus Grove, Ohio
30
Exhibit 23
Consent of Independent Accountants
The Board of Directors
United Bancshares, Inc.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-106929) on Form S-8 of United Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of United Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Bancshares, Inc.
/s/ CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP |
Toledo, Ohio
March 21, 2006
31
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION - CEO
In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel W. Schutt, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Bancshares, Inc., certify, that:
(1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Bancshares, Inc.;
(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for the registrant and we have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is being prepared;
b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure control and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DANIEL W. SCHUTT
Daniel W. Schutt
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 21, 2006
32
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION - CFO
In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian D. Young, Chief Financial Officer of United Bancshares, Inc., certify, that:
(1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Bancshares, Inc.;
(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for the registrant and we have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is being prepared;
b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure control and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Brian D. Young
Brian D. Young
Chief Financial Officer
March 21, 2006
33
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel W. Schutt, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
/s/ DANIEL W. SCHUTT
Daniel W. Schutt
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 21, 2006
*This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a 14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
34
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian D. Young, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
/s/ Brian D. Young
Brian D. Young
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 21, 2006
*This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a 14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
35
Exhibit 99.1
SAFE HARBOR UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") provides a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their companies, so long as those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the statement. United Bancshares, Inc. ("Corporation") desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Act. Certain information, particularly information regarding future economic performance and finances and plans and objectives of management, contained or incorporated by reference in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, is forward-looking. In some cases, information regarding certain important factors that could cause actual results of operations or outcomes of other events to differ materially from any such forward-looking statement appears together with such statement. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to other risks and uncertainties affecting the financial institutions industry, including, but not limited to, the following:
Interest Rate Risk
The Corporations operating results are dependent to a significant degree on its net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans, investments and other interest-earning assets and interest expense on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. The interest income and interest expense of the Corporation change as the interest rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities change. Interest rates may change because of general economic conditions, the policies of various regulatory authorities and other factors beyond the Corporation's control. In a rising interest rate environment, loans tend to prepay slowly and new loans at higher rates increase slowly, while interest paid on deposits increases rapidly because the terms to maturity of deposits tend to be shorter than the terms to maturity or prepayment of loans. Such differences in the adjustment of interest rates on assets and liabilities may negatively affect the Corporation's income.
Possible Inadequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon a number of relevant factors, including, but not limited to, trends in the level of non-performing assets and classified loans, current economic conditions in the primary lending area, past loss experience, possible losses arising from specific problem loans and changes in the composition of the loan portfolio. While the Board of Directors of the Corporation believes that it uses the best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, unforeseen market conditions could result in material adjustments, and net earnings could be significantly adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination.
Loans not secured by one-to-four family residential real estate are generally considered to involve greater risk of loss than loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate due, in part, to the effects of general economic conditions. The repayment of multifamily residential, nonresidential real estate and commercial loans generally depends upon the cash flow from the operation of the property or business, which may be negatively affected by national and local economic conditions. Construction loans may also be negatively affected by such economic conditions, particularly loans made to developers who do not have a buyer for a property before the loan is made. The risk of default on consumer loans increases during periods of recession, high unemployment and other adverse economic conditions. When consumers have trouble paying their bills, they are more likely to pay mortgage loans than consumer loans. In addition, the collateral securing such loans, if any, may decrease in value more rapidly than the outstanding balance of the loan.
36
Competition
The Corporation competes for deposits with other savings associations, commercial banks and credit unions and issuers of commercial paper and other securities, such as shares in money market mutual funds. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates and convenience of office location. In making loans, the Corporation competes with other commercial banks, savings associations, consumer finance companies, credit unions, leasing companies, mortgage companies and other lenders. Competition is affected by, among other things, the general availability of lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current interest rate levels and other factors that are not readily predictable. The size of financial institutions competing with the Corporation are likely to increase as a result of changes in statutes and regulations eliminating various restrictions on interstate and inter-industry branching and acquisitions. Such increased competition may have an adverse effect upon the Corporation.
Legislation and Regulation that may Adversely Affect the Corporation's Earnings
The Corporation is subject to extensive regulation by the State of Ohio, Division of Financial Institutions (the ODFI), the Federal Reserve Bank (the FED), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") and is periodically examined by such regulatory agencies to test compliance with various regulatory requirements. As a bank holding company, the Corporation is also subject to regulation and examination by the FED. Such supervision and regulation of the Corporation and the bank are intended primarily for the protection of depositors and not for the maximization of shareholder value and may affect the ability of the company to engage in various business activities. The assessments, filing fees and other costs associated with reports, examinations and other regulatory matters are significant and may have an adverse effect on the Corporation's net earnings.
The FDIC is authorized to establish separate annual assessment rates for deposit insurance of members of the Bank Insurance fund (the "BIF") and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF"). The FDIC has established a risk-based assessment system for both BIF and SAIF members. Under such system, assessments may vary depending on the risk the institution poses to its deposit insurance fund. Such risk level is determined by reference to the institution's capital level and the FDIC's level of supervisory concern about the bank.
37