UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST - Quarter Report: 2014 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-9321

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (610) 265-0688

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of common shares of beneficial interest outstanding at October 31, 2014—12,931,354

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

INDEX

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is for the quarter ended September 30, 2014. In this Quarterly Report, “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Trust” refer to Universal Health Realty Income Trust and its subsidiaries.

As disclosed in this Quarterly Report, including in Part I, Item 1.—Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) and Related Party Transactions, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS (UHS of Delaware, Inc.) serves as our Advisor pursuant to the terms of an annually renewable Advisory Agreement dated December 24, 1986. Our officers are all employees of UHS through UHS of Delaware, Inc. In addition, four of our hospital facilities are leased to subsidiaries of UHS and twelve medical office buildings, including one property owned by a limited liability company in which we hold 95% of the non-controlling, majority ownership interest, include or will include tenants which are subsidiaries of UHS. Any reference to “UHS” or “UHS facilities” in this report is referring to Universal Health Services, Inc.’s subsidiaries, including UHS of Delaware, Inc.

In this Quarterly Report, the term “revenues” does not include the revenues of the unconsolidated limited liability companies (“LLCs”) in which we have various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 95%. We currently account for our share of the income/loss from these investments by the equity method (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein).

Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information

Item I. Financial Statements

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

See the accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

See the accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

See the accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2014

(unaudited)

(1) General

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is for the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2014. In this Quarterly Report, “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Trust” refer to Universal Health Realty Income Trust.

You should carefully review all of the information contained in this Quarterly Report, and should particularly consider any risk factors that we set forth in this Quarterly Report and in other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In this Quarterly Report, we state our beliefs of future events and of our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify those so-called “forward-looking statements” by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “appears,” “projects” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense. You should be aware that those statements are only our predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating those statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 in Item 1A Risk Factors and in Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Forward Looking Statements. Those factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any of our forward-looking statements.

In certain of our markets, the general real estate market has been unfavorably impacted by increased competition/capacity and decreases in occupancy and rental rates which may adversely impact our operating results and the underlying value of our properties. In addition, although credit markets conditions and the instability in certain banking and financial institutions over the past several years has not had a material impact on us, there can be no assurance that unfavorable changes in credit market conditions, should they occur, will not materially increase our cost of borrowings and/or have a material adverse impact on our ability to finance our future growth through borrowed funds.

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the term “revenues” does not include the revenues of the unconsolidated limited liability companies (“LLCs”) in which we have various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 95%. We currently account for our share of the income/loss from these investments by the equity method (see Note 5). As of September 30, 2014, we had investments in five jointly-owned LLCs, all of which are accounted for by the equity method as of September 30, 2014. Palmdale Medical Properties was consolidated in our financial statements through June 30, 2013 as a result of a master lease arrangement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS. As previously disclosed, the master lease expired effective as of July 1, 2013 and, as of that date, we began accounting for Palmdale Medical Properties under the equity method through December 31, 2013. Effective January 1, 2014, we purchased the third-party minority ownership interests in Palmdale Medical Properties and Sparks Medical Properties in which we formerly held non-controlling majority ownership interests. As a result of our purchase of the minority ownership interests, we now hold 100% of the ownership interests in these LLCs which own MOBs and we began accounting for them on a consolidated basis effective January 1, 2014. Additionally, effective August 1, 2014, we purchased the third-party minority ownership interests in the six LLCs listed below in which we formerly held non-controlling majority ownership interests ranging from 85% to 95%. As a result of our purchase of the minority ownership interests, we now hold 100% of the ownership interests in these LLCs which own MOBs and we began accounting for them on a consolidated basis effective August 1, 2014. At the effective date of the purchase of the minority interests, each of the property’s assets and liabilities (Palmdale Medical Properties, Sparks Medical Properties and the six LLCs listed below) are recorded at their fair values. (See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure).

7

Table of Contents

The financial statements included herein have been prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which, in our opinion, are necessary to fairly present results for the interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the accompanying disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements, the notes thereto and accounting policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

(2) Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) and Related Party Transactions

Leases: We commenced operations in 1986 by purchasing properties of certain subsidiaries from UHS and immediately leasing the properties back to the respective subsidiaries. Most of the leases were entered into at the time we commenced operations and provided for initial terms of 13 to 15 years with up to six additional 5-year renewal terms. The current base rentals and lease and rental terms for each facility are provided below. The base rents are paid monthly and each lease also provides for additional or bonus rents which are computed and paid on a quarterly basis based upon a computation that compares current quarter revenue to a corresponding quarter in the base year. The leases with subsidiaries of UHS are unconditionally guaranteed by UHS and are cross-defaulted with one another.

The combined revenues generated from the leases on the UHS hospital facilities comprised approximately 27% and 30% of our consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately 29% and 30% of our consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Including 100% of the revenues generated at the unconsolidated LLCs in which we have various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 95%, the leases on the UHS hospital facilities accounted for approximately 22% of the combined consolidated and unconsolidated revenue for each of the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. In addition, twelve MOBs, that are either wholly or jointly-owned, include or will include tenants which are subsidiaries of UHS.

Pursuant to the Master Lease Document by and among us and certain subsidiaries of UHS, dated December 24, 1986 (the “Master Lease”), which governs the leases of all hospital properties with subsidiaries of UHS, UHS has the option to renew the leases at the lease terms described below by providing notice to us at least 90 days prior to the termination of the then current term. UHS also has the right to purchase the respective leased facilities at the end of the lease terms or any renewal terms at the appraised fair market value. In addition, UHS has rights of first refusal to: (i) purchase the respective leased facilities during and for 180 days after the lease terms at the same price, terms and conditions of any third-party offer, or; (ii) renew the lease on the respective leased facility at the end of, and for 180 days after, the lease term at the same terms and conditions pursuant to any third-party offer. In addition, the Master Lease, as amended during 2006, includes a change of control provision whereby UHS has the right, upon one month’s notice should a change of control of the Trust occur, to purchase any or all of the four leased hospital properties listed below at their appraised fair market value.

During the third quarter of 2014, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS provided notification to us that, upon expiration of The Bridgeway’s current lease term in December, 2014, it intends to exercise its option to purchase the real property of the facility. We anticipate that the sale of The Bridgeway, a 103-bed behavioral health facility located in North Little Rock, Arkansas, will occur on December 31, 2014. Our revenues, net cash provided by operating activities and funds from operations have included approximately $1.1 million earned annually in connection with The Bridgeway’s lease. Pursuant to the terms of the lease, we and the wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS are both required to obtain appraisals of the property to determine its fair market value. Based upon the preliminary property appraisals obtained by each party, we estimate that the sales proceeds in connection with the divestiture of The Bridgeway will approximate $17.0 million to $17.5 million. Should the divestiture of The Bridgeway occur as outlined above, we estimate that our results of operations for the three and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2014 will include a gain on divestiture of approximately $12.6 million to $13.1 million.

In addition, UHS is currently negotiating with us regarding our potential ownership of the real property of two free-standing emergency departments located in Texas which are currently under construction and scheduled to be completed during the first quarter of 2015. Since these potential transactions are contingent upon the completion and execution of acquisition and lease agreements (subsidiaries of UHS are expected to operate the facilities), we can provide no assurance that these transactions will ultimately occur. Should they occur, pursuant to the terms of acquisition and lease agreements as currently contemplated, we estimate that the aggregate acquisition cost of these facilities will approximate $12.5 million to $13.0 million, and the aggregate rental revenues earned at the commencement of the leases will approximate $850,000 to $900,000 annually.

8

Table of Contents

The table below details the existing lease terms and renewal options for each of the UHS hospital facilities:

As discussed above, Palmdale Medical Plaza, which is located in Palmdale, California, on the campus of a UHS hospital, had a master lease commitment by a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS which expired effective as of July 1, 2013. This MOB, tenants of which include subsidiaries of UHS, was completed and opened during the third quarter of 2008 at which time the master lease commenced. The LLC that owns this MOB was deemed to be a variable interest entity during the term of the master lease and was therefore consolidated in our financial statements through June 30, 2013 since we were the primary beneficiary through that date. Effective July 1, 2013, this LLC was no longer deemed a variable interest entity and is accounted for in our financial statements on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the equity method from July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.

Effective January 1, 2014, we purchased the third-party minority ownership interests in two LLCs (Palmdale Medical Properties and Sparks Medical Properties) in which we formerly held non-controlling majority ownership interest. As a result of our purchase of the minority ownership interests, we now hold 100% of the ownership interests in these LLCs (which own MOBs) and began accounting for them on a consolidated basis.

We have funded $2.5 million in equity as of September 30, 2014, and are committed to fund an additional $500,000, in exchange for a 95% non-controlling equity interest in an LLC (Texoma Medical Properties) that developed, constructed, owns and operates the Texoma Medical Plaza located in Denison, Texas, which was completed and opened during the first quarter of 2010. This MOB is located on the campus of a UHS acute care hospital which is owned and operated by Texoma Medical Center (“Texoma Hospital”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS. This MOB has tenants that include subsidiaries of UHS. This LLC has a third-party term loan of $14.9 million, which is non-recourse to us, outstanding as of September 30, 2014. As this LLC is not considered to be a variable interest entity and does not meet the other criteria requiring consolidation of an investment, it is accounted for pursuant to the equity method.

Advisory Agreement: UHS of Delaware, Inc. (the “Advisor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, serves as Advisor to us under an Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) dated December 24, 1986. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is obligated to present an investment program to us, to use its best efforts to obtain investments suitable for such program (although it is not obligated to present any particular investment opportunity to us), to provide administrative services to us and to conduct our day-to-day affairs. All transactions between us and UHS must be approved by the Trustees who are unaffiliated with UHS (the “Independent Trustees”). In performing its services under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor may utilize independent professional services, including accounting, legal, tax and other services, for which the Advisor is reimbursed directly by us. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated for any reason upon sixty days written notice by us or the Advisor. The Advisory Agreement expires on December 31 of each year; however, it is renewable by us, subject to a determination by the Independent Trustees, that the Advisor’s performance has been satisfactory. In December of 2013, based upon a review of our advisory fee and other general and administrative expenses, as compared to an industry peer group, the Advisory agreement was renewed for 2014 pursuant to the same terms as the Advisory Agreement in place during 2013.

The Advisory Agreement provides that the Advisor is entitled to receive an annual advisory fee equal to 0.70% of our average invested real estate assets, as derived from our condensed consolidated balance sheet. The average real estate assets for advisory fee calculation purposes exclude certain items from our condensed consolidated balance sheet such as, among other things, accumulated depreciation, cash and cash equivalents, base and bonus rent receivables, deferred charges and other assets. The advisory fee is payable quarterly, subject to adjustment at year-end based upon our audited financial statements. In addition, the Advisor is entitled to an annual incentive fee equal to 20% of the amount by which cash available for distribution to shareholders for each year, as defined in the Advisory Agreement, exceeds 15% of our equity as shown on our condensed consolidated balance sheet, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles without reduction for return of capital dividends. The Advisory Agreement defines cash available for distribution to shareholders as net cash flow from operations less deductions for, among other things,

9

Table of Contents

amounts required to discharge our debt and liabilities and reserves for replacement and capital improvements to our properties and investments. No incentive fees were paid during the first nine months of 2014 or 2013 since the incentive fee requirements were not achieved. Advisory fees incurred and paid (or payable) to UHS amounted to $653,000 and $603,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and were based upon average invested real estate assets of $373 million and $345 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Advisory fees incurred and paid (or payable) to UHS amounted to $1.9 million and $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and were based upon average invested real estate assets of $359 million and $335 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Officers and Employees: Our officers are all employees of a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS and although as of September 30, 2014 we had no salaried employees, our officers do typically receive annual stock-based compensation awards in the form of restricted stock. In special circumstances, if warranted and deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees, our officers may also receive one-time special compensation awards in the form of restricted stock and/or cash bonuses.

Share Ownership: As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, UHS owned 6.1% of our outstanding shares of beneficial interest.

SEC reporting requirements of UHS: UHS is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to file annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. Since the leases on the hospital facilities leased to wholly-owned subsidiaries of UHS comprised approximately 27% and 30% of our consolidated revenues during the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and comprised approximately 29% and 30% of our consolidated revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and since a subsidiary of UHS is our Advisor, you are encouraged to obtain the publicly available filings for Universal Health Services, Inc. from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. These filings are the sole responsibility of UHS and are not incorporated by reference herein.

(3) Dividends and Equity Issuance Program

We declared and paid dividends of $8.1 million, or $.63 per share, during the third quarter of 2014 and $7.9 million, or $.625 per share, during the third quarter of 2013. We declared and paid dividends of $24.3 million, or $1.885 per share, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 and $23.7 million, or $1.87 per share, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, we entered into an ATM Equity Offering Sales Agreement (“Sales Agreement”) with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”), under which we may offer and sell our common shares of beneficial interest, up to an aggregate sales price of $50 million. The common shares will be offered pursuant to the Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which became effective in November, 2012, under which we can offer up to $50 million of our securities pursuant to supplemental prospectuses which we may file from time to time.

Pursuant to this ATM program, during the first nine months of 2014, we issued 57,410 shares at an average price of $42.67 per share (all issued during the first quarter of 2014). Including the shares issued at the end of the fourth quarter of 2013, which settled during the first quarter of 2014, the ATM program generated approximately $2.9 million of net cash proceeds, (net of approximately $182,000, consisting of compensation of approximately $76,000 to Merrill Lynch, as well as approximately $106,000 of other various fees and expenses) during the first nine months of 2014. Approximately $592,000 of net cash proceeds (net of approximately $15,000 of compensation to Merrill Lynch) related to the shares issued late in the fourth quarter of 2013 and were received by us during the first quarter of 2014. Since inception of this program through September 30, 2014, we have issued 212,123 shares at an average price of $41.97 per share, which generated approximately $8.4 million of cash proceeds (net of approximately $537,000, consisting of compensation of approximately $222,000 to Merrill Lynch, as well as approximately $315,000 of other various fees and expenses).

(4) Acquisitions, Dispositions and New Construction

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014:

Acquisitions:

The aggregate purchase price for this clinic was allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired consisting of tangible property and identified intangible assets, based on their respective fair values at acquisition as detailed in the table below. Substantially all of the intangible assets include the value of the in-place lease at the clinic at the time of acquisition which will be amortized over the average remaining lease term of approximately 9.8 years at the time of acquisition.

10

Table of Contents

The aggregate fair values of these MOBs was preliminarily allocated to estimated net tangible property ($64.5 million), identified intangible assets ($3.7 million), and long term debt ($19.0 million), and may be adjusted based upon final valuations determined pursuant to third-party appraisals. Substantially all of the intangible assets include the value of the in-place leases at these MOBs at the time of acquisition which will be amortized over the combined average remaining lease term of approximately 4.7 years at the time of acquisition. Other than the increased depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the amortization of the intangible assets recorded in connection with these transactions, there was no material impact on our net income as a result of the consolidation of these LLCs.

The aggregate purchase price for these MOBs was allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired consisting of tangible property and identified intangible assets, based on their respective fair values at acquisition as detailed in the table below. Substantially all of the intangible assets include the value of the in-place leases at the MOBs at the time of acquisition which will be amortized over the average remaining lease term of approximately 9.7 years at the time of acquisition.

11

Table of Contents

The acquisition was preliminarily valued utilizing the income capitalization approach. The calculated fair value, utilizing the income capitalization approach, is based upon the basis of capitalization of the net estimated earnings expectancy of the property, assuming continued use similar to the existing use of the acquired property. The property’s continued cash flow analysis were also utilized in estimating the fair value of the property, whereby cash flows from the various tenants are calculated based upon lease commencement and termination dates.

The aggregate fair values of these MOBs was allocated to net tangible property ($19.5 million), identified intangible assets ($2.8 million), and long term debt ($10.7 million). Substantially all of the intangible assets include the value of the in-place leases at these MOBs at the time of acquisition which will be amortized over the combined average remaining lease term of approximately 5.3 years at the time of acquisition. Other than the increased depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the amortization of the intangible assets recorded in connection with these transactions, there was no material impact on our net income as a result of the consolidation of these LLCs.

Divestitures:

There were no divestitures during the first nine months of 2014.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013:

Acquisition:

On August 22, 2013, we purchased the Ward Eagle Office Village, a medical office building located in Farmington Hills, Michigan. This multi-tenant MOB, which was purchased for approximately $4.1 million, consists of approximately 16,282 rentable square feet. The net tangible and intangible property asset allocation of the total purchase price was recorded during the third quarter of 2013.

On June 6, 2013, we purchased the 5004 Poole Road medical office building located in Denison, Texas, on the campus of Texoma Medical Center, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS. This single-tenant MOB, which was purchased for approximately $625,000, consists of approximately 4,400 rentable square feet and is located adjacent to our Texoma Medical Plaza MOB.

New Construction:

The newly constructed Forney Medical Plaza II located in Forney, Texas was completed and opened in April, 2013. This multi-tenant medical office building, consisting of 30,000 rentable square feet, is owned by a limited partnership in which we hold a 95% non-controlling ownership interest. As this LLC is not considered to be a variable interest entity, it is accounted for pursuant to the equity method.

Divestitures:

There were no divestitures during the first nine months of 2013.

(5) Summarized Financial Information of Equity Affiliates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of our controlled investments and those investments that meet the criteria of a variable interest entity where we are or were the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) standards and guidance relating to accounting for investments and real estate ventures, we account for our unconsolidated investments in LLCs which we do not control using the equity method of accounting. The third-party members in these investments have equal voting rights with regards to issues such as, but not limited to: (i) divestiture of

12

Table of Contents

property; (ii) annual budget approval, and; (iii) financing commitments. These investments, which represent 33% to 95% non-controlling ownership interests, are recorded initially at our cost and subsequently adjusted for our net equity in the net income, cash contributions to, and distributions from, the investments. Pursuant to certain agreements, allocations of sales proceeds and profits and losses of some of the LLC investments may be allocated disproportionately as compared to ownership interests after specified preferred return rate thresholds have been satisfied.

At September 30, 2014, we have non-controlling equity investments or commitments in five jointly-owned LLCs which own MOBs. As of September 30, 2014, we accounted for these LLCs on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the equity method since they are not variable interest entities. The majority of these LLCs are joint-ventures between us and non-related parties that manage and hold minority ownership interests in the entities. Each LLC is generally self-sustained from a cash flow perspective and generates sufficient cash flow to meet its operating cash flow requirements and service the third-party debt (if applicable) that is non-recourse to us. Although there is typically no ongoing financial support required from us to these entities since they are cash-flow sufficient, we may, from time to time, provide funding for certain purposes such as, but not limited to, significant capital expenditures, leasehold improvements and debt financing. Although we are not obligated to do so, if approved by us at our sole discretion, additional cash fundings are typically advanced as equity or member loans.

Effective August 1, 2014, we purchased the minority ownership interests, ranging from 5% to 15%, held by third-party members in six LLCs in which we previously held noncontrolling majority ownership interests, as noted in the table below. As a result of these minority ownership purchases, we now own 100% of each of these LLCs and began to account for them on a consolidated basis effective August 1, 2014. Prior to August 1, 2014, these LLCs were accounted for on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the equity method.

Effective January 1, 2014, we purchased the 5% minority ownership interests held by third-party members in two LLCs in which we previously held noncontrolling majority ownership interests (Palmdale Medical Properties and Sparks Medical Properties). As a result of these minority ownership purchases, we now own 100% of each of these LLCs and account for them on a consolidated basis. Prior to January 1, 2014, these LLCs were accounted for on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the equity method. Previously, Palmdale Medical Properties (“Palmdale”) was included in our financial statements on a consolidated basis through June 30, 2013 as a result of a master lease arrangement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, which expired on July 1, 2013.

At September 30, 2014, the LLCs in which we hold various non-controlling ownership interests are not variable interest entities and therefore are not subject to consolidation. As a result of master lease arrangements between UHS and various LLCs in which we hold majority non-controlling ownership interests, we have consolidated or deconsolidated these LLCs as required in accordance with the FASB’s standards and guidance.

Rental income is recorded by our consolidated and unconsolidated MOBs relating to leases in excess of one year in length using the straight-line method under which contractual rents are recognized evenly over the lease term regardless of when payments are due. The amount of rental revenue resulting from straight-line rent adjustments is dependent on many factors, including the nature and amount of any rental concessions granted to new tenants, scheduled rent increases under existing leases, as well as the acquisition and sales of properties that have existing in-place leases with terms in excess of one year. As a result, the straight-line adjustments to rental revenue may vary from period-to-period.

The following property table represents the five LLCs in which we own a noncontrolling interest and were accounted for under the equity method as of September 30, 2014:

13

Table of Contents

Below are the condensed combined statements of income (unaudited) for the LLCs accounted for under the equity method at September 30, 2014 and 2013. The combined statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 include the financial results through July 31, 2014, for the six LLCs (Desert Valley Medical Center, Santa Fe Professional Plaza, Rosenberg Children’s Medical Plaza, Sierra San Antonio Medical Plaza, Phoenix Children’s East Valley Care Center and 3811 E. Bell Medical Building Medical Plaza) that we began to account for on a consolidated basis as of August 1, 2014, as discussed above.

14

Table of Contents

Below are the condensed combined balance sheets (unaudited) for the LLCs accounted for under the equity method:

As of September 30, 2014, aggregate principal amounts due on mortgage notes payable by unconsolidated LLCs, which are accounted for under the equity method and are non-recourse to us, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

15

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the operating agreements of the LLCs, the third-party member and the Trust, at any time, have the right to make an offer (“Offering Member”) to the other member(s) (“Non-Offering Member”) in which it either agrees to: (i) sell the entire ownership interest of the Offering Member to the Non-Offering Member (“Offer to Sell”) at a price as determined by the Offering Member (“Transfer Price”), or; (ii) purchase the entire ownership interest of the Non-Offering Member (“Offer to Purchase”) at the equivalent proportionate Transfer Price. The Non-Offering Member has 60 days to either: (i) purchase the entire ownership interest of the Offering Member at the Transfer Price, or; (ii) sell its entire ownership interest to the Offering Member at the equivalent proportionate Transfer Price. The closing of the transfer must occur within 60 days of the acceptance by the Non-Offering Member.

The LLCs in which we have invested maintain property insurance on all properties. Although we believe that generally our properties are adequately insured, two of the wholly-owned LLCs own properties in California that are located in earthquake zones. These properties are not covered by earthquake insurance since earthquake insurance is no longer available at rates which are economical in relation to the risks covered.

(6) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the FASB issued changes to the disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Under GAAP, continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Even if an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Because there is no guidance in GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related note disclosures, there is diversity in practice whether, when, and how an entity discloses the relevant conditions and events in its financial statements. As a result, these changes require an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. Substantial doubt is defined as an indication that it is probable that an entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. If management has concluded that substantial doubt exists, then the following disclosures should be made in the financial statements: (i) principal conditions or events that raised the substantial doubt, (ii) management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations, (iii) management’s plans that alleviated the initial substantial doubt or, if substantial doubt was not alleviated, management’s plans that are intended to at least mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt, and (iv) if the latter in (iii) is disclosed, an explicit statement that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. These changes become effective for the 2016 annual period. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will not have an impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. Subsequent to adoption, this guidance will need to be applied by management at the end of each annual period and interim period therein to determine what, if any, impact there will be on the Consolidated Financial Statements in a given reporting period.

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board updated the accounting guidance related to the definition of a discontinued operation and the related disclosures. The updated accounting guidance defines a discontinued operation as a disposal of a component or a group of components that is to be disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The updated guidance is applicable to us effective January 1, 2015 with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

(7) Debt and Financial Instruments

Debt:

In July, 2011, we entered into a $150 million revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) which is scheduled to expire on July 24, 2015. We are in the early stages of renegotiating our Credit Agreement and expect to complete a replacement credit facility within the next three months. We can provide no assurance that a replacement credit facility will be obtained on acceptable terms. The Credit Agreement includes a $50 million sub limit for letters of credit and a $20 million sub limit for swingline/short-term loans. The Credit Agreement also provides an option to increase the total facility borrowing capacity by an additional $50 million, subject to lender agreement. Borrowings made pursuant to the Credit Agreement will bear interest, at our option, at one, two, three, or six month LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.50% or at the Base Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.50%. The Credit Agreement defines “Base Rate” as the greatest of: (a) the administrative agent’s prime rate; (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, and; (c) one month LIBOR plus 1%. A fee of 0.30% to 0.50% will be charged on the unused portion of the commitment. The margins over LIBOR, Base Rate and the commitment fee are based upon our ratio of debt to total capital. At September 30, 2014, the applicable margin over the LIBOR rate was 2.00%, the margin over the Base Rate was 1.00%, and the commitment fee was 0.35%.

At September 30, 2014, we had $120.5 million of outstanding borrowings and $6.3 million of letters of credit outstanding against our revolving credit agreement. We had $23.3 million of available borrowing capacity, net of the outstanding borrowings and letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2014. There are no compensating balance requirements.

On July 1, 2014, we borrowed an additional $9.1 million under our revolving credit agreement, which was utilized to repay the outstanding mortgage balance on the Summerlin Hospital Medical Office Building I. The mortgage loan on this property matured on July 1, 2014.

Covenants relating to the Agreement require the maintenance of a minimum tangible net worth and specified financial ratios, limit our ability to incur additional debt, limit the aggregate amount of mortgage receivables and limit our ability to increase dividends in excess of 95% of cash available for distribution, unless additional distributions are required to comply with the applicable section of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and related regulations governing real estate investment trusts. We are in compliance with all of the covenants at September 30, 2014. We also believe that we would remain in compliance if the full amount of our commitment was borrowed.

16

Table of Contents

The following table includes a summary of the required compliance ratios, giving effect to the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement (dollar amounts in thousands):

We have sixteen mortgages, all of which are non-recourse to us, included on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2014, with a combined outstanding balance of $123.7 million (excluding net debt premium of $584,000). The following table summarizes our outstanding mortgages, excluding net debt premium, at September 30, 2014 (amounts in thousands):

17

Table of Contents

The mortgages are secured by the real property of the buildings as well as property leases and rents. The mortgages have a combined fair value of approximately $125 million as of September 30, 2014. Changes in market rates on our fixed rate debt impacts the fair value of debt, but it has no impact on interest incurred or cash flow.

Financial Instruments:

During the third quarter of 2013, we entered into an interest rate cap on a total notional amount of $10 million whereby we paid a premium of $136,000. During the first quarter of 2014, we entered into two additional interest rate cap agreements on a total notional amount of $20 million whereby we paid premiums of $134,500. In exchange for the premium payments, the counterparties agreed to pay us the difference between 1.50% and one-month LIBOR if one-month LIBOR rises above 1.50% during the term of the cap. The caps expire on January 13, 2017.

(8) Segment Reporting

Our primary business is investing in and leasing healthcare and human service facilities through direct ownership or through joint ventures, which aggregate into a single reportable segment. We actively manage our portfolio of healthcare and human service facilities and may from time to time make decisions to sell lower performing properties not meeting our long-term investment objectives. The proceeds of sales are typically reinvested in new developments or acquisitions, which we believe will meet our planned rate of return. It is our intent that all healthcare and human service facilities will be owned or developed for investment purposes. Our revenue and net income are generated from the operation of our investment portfolio.

Our portfolio is located throughout the United States, however, we do not distinguish or group our operations on a geographical basis for purposes of allocating resources or measuring performance. We review operating and financial data for each property on an individual basis; therefore, we define an operating segment as our individual properties. Individual properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment based upon their similarities with regard to both the nature and economics of the facilities, tenants and operational processes, as well as long-term average financial performance.

Overview

We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that commenced operations in 1986. We invest in healthcare and human service related facilities including acute care hospitals, behavioral healthcare facilities, rehabilitation hospitals, sub-acute facilities, surgery centers, childcare centers and medical office buildings (“MOBs”). As of September 30, 2014, we have fifty-nine real estate investments or commitments located in seventeen states consisting of:

18

Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements and Certain Risk Factors

This report contains “forward-looking statements” that reflect our current estimates, expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, the information concerning our possible future results of operations, business and growth strategies, financing plans, expectations that regulatory developments or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, our competitive position and the effects of competition, the projected growth of the industry in which we operate, and the benefits and synergies to be obtained from our completed and any future acquisitions, and statements of our goals and objectives, and other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “appears,” “projects” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking information is based on information available at the time and/or our good faith belief with respect to future events, and is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements. Such factors include, among other things, the following:

19

Table of Contents

Given these uncertainties, risks and assumptions, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Our actual results and financial condition, including the operating results of our lessees and the facilities leased to subsidiaries of UHS, could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. We assume no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information, except as may be required by law. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

20

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We consider our critical accounting policies to be those that require us to make significant judgments and estimates when we prepare our financial statements, including the following:

Revenue Recognition: Our revenues consist primarily of rentals received from tenants, which are comprised of minimum rent (base rentals), bonus rentals and reimbursements from tenants for their pro-rata share of expenses such as common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and utilities.

The minimum rent for all hospital facilities is fixed over the initial term or renewal term of the respective leases. Rental income recorded by our consolidated and unconsolidated medical office buildings (“MOBs”) relating to leases in excess of one year in length is recognized using the straight-line method under which contractual rents are recognized evenly over the lease term regardless of when payments are due. The amount of rental revenue resulting from straight-line rent adjustments is dependent on many factors including the nature and amount of any rental concessions granted to new tenants, scheduled rent increases under existing leases, as well as the acquisitions and sales of properties that have existing in-place leases with terms in excess of one year. As a result, the straight-line adjustments to rental revenue may vary from period-to-period. Bonus rents are recognized when earned based upon increases in each facility’s net revenue in excess of stipulated amounts. Bonus rentals are determined and paid each quarter based upon a computation that compares the respective facility’s current quarter’s net revenue to the corresponding quarter in the base year. Tenant reimbursements for operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the same period the related expenses are incurred.

Real Estate Investments: On the date of acquisition, the purchase price of a property is allocated to the property’s land, buildings and intangible assets based upon our estimates of their fair values. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the buildings and capital improvements. The value of intangible assets is amortized over the remaining lease term.

Asset Impairment: Real estate investments and related intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property might not be recoverable. A property to be held and used is considered impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows, less estimated capital expenditures, to be generated by the property, undiscounted and without interest charges, are less than the carrying value of the property. This estimate takes into consideration factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition, local market conditions and other factors.

The determination of undiscounted cash flows requires significant estimates by management, including the expected course of action at the balance sheet date that would lead to such cash flows. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in anticipated action to be taken with respect to the property could impact the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could materially impact our net income. To the extent estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property.

Assessment of the recoverability by us of certain lease related costs must be made when we have reason to believe that a tenant might not be able to perform under the terms of the lease as originally expected. This requires us to make estimates as to the recoverability of such costs. If we determine that the intangible assets are not recoverable from future cash flows, the excess of carrying value of the intangible asset over its estimated fair value is charged to income.

An other than temporary impairment of an investment/advance in an LLC is recognized when the carrying value of the investment is not considered recoverable based on evaluation of the severity and duration of the decline in value, including projected declines in cash flow. To the extent impairment has occurred, the excess carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value is charged to income.

Investments in Limited Liability Companies (“LLCs”): Our condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of our controlled investments and those investments that meet the criteria of a variable interest entity where we are the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the FASB’s standards and guidance relating to accounting for investments and real estate ventures, we account for our unconsolidated investments in LLCs which we do not control using the equity method of accounting. The third-party members in these investments have equal voting rights with regards to issues such as, but not limited to: (i) divestiture of property; (ii) annual budget approval, and; (iii) financing commitments. These investments, which represent 33% to 95% non-controlling ownership interests, are recorded initially at our cost and subsequently adjusted for our net equity in the net income, cash contributions to, and distributions from, the investments. Pursuant to certain agreements, allocations of sales proceeds and profits and losses of some of the LLC investments may be allocated disproportionately as compared to ownership interests after specified preferred return rate thresholds have been satisfied.

21

Table of Contents

At September 30, 2014, we have non-controlling equity investments or commitments in five jointly-owned LLCs which own MOBs. As of September 30, 2014, we accounted for these LLCs on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the equity method since they are not variable interest entities. Palmdale Medical Properties was consolidated in our financial statements through June 30, 2013. As previously disclosed, the master lease with a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS related to Palmdale Medical Properties expired effective as of July 1, 2013 and, as of that date, we began accounting for Palmdale Medical Properties under the equity method.

Effective August 1, 2014, we purchased the third-party minority ownership interests in six LLCs (Desert Valley Medical Center, Santa Fe Professional Plaza, Rosenberg Children’s Medical Plaza, Sierra San Antonio Medical Plaza, Phoenix Children’s East Valley Care Center and 3811 E. Bell Medical Building Medical Plaza). Effective January 1, 2014, we purchased the third-party minority ownership interests in Palmdale Medical Properties and Sparks Medical Properties. We formerly held non-controlling majority ownership interests in all of these LLCs, and as a result of our purchase of the minority ownership interests, we now hold 100% of the ownership interests in these LLCs which own MOBs. As a result, we began accounting for the six LLCs mentioned above on a consolidated basis effective August 1, 2014 and we began accounting for Palmdale Medical Properties and Sparks Medical Properties on a consolidated basis effective January 1, 2014. Each of the property’s assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values.

Five of these LLCs are joint-ventures between us and non-related parties that manage and hold minority ownership interests in the entities. Each LLC is generally self-sustained from a cash flow perspective and generates sufficient cash flow to meet its operating cash flow requirements and service the third-party debt (if applicable) that is non-recourse to us. Although there is typically no ongoing financial support required from us to these entities since they are cash-flow sufficient, we may, from time to time, provide funding for certain purposes such as, but not limited to, significant capital expenditures, leasehold improvements and debt financing. Although we are not obligated to do so, if approved by us at our sole discretion, additional cash fundings are typically advanced as equity or member loans.

Federal Income Taxes: No provision has been made for federal income tax purposes since we qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and intend to continue to remain so qualified. As such, we are exempt from federal income taxes and we are required to distribute at least 90% of our real estate investment taxable income to our shareholders.

We are subject to a federal excise tax computed on a calendar year basis. The excise tax equals 4% of the amount by which 85% of our ordinary income plus 95% of any capital gain income for the calendar year exceeds cash distributions during the calendar year, as defined. No provision for excise tax has been reflected in the financial statements as no tax is expected to be due.

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of dividends to shareholders, will differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due to the differences for federal tax purposes in the cost basis of assets and in the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation and the recording of provision for investment losses.

Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) and Related Party Transactions - UHS is our principal tenant and through UHS of Delaware, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UHS, serves as our advisor (the “Advisor”) under an Advisory Agreement dated December 24, 1986 between the Advisor and us (the “Advisory Agreement”). Our officers are all employees of UHS (through UHS of Delaware, Inc.) and although as of September 30, 2014 we had no salaried employees, our officers do receive stock-based compensation from time-to-time.

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is obligated to present an investment program to us, to use its best efforts to obtain investments suitable for such program (although it is not obligated to present any particular investment opportunity to us), to provide administrative services to us and to conduct our day-to-day affairs. All transactions between us and UHS must be approved by the Trustees who are unaffiliated with UHS (the “Independent Trustees”). In performing its services under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor may utilize independent professional services, including accounting, legal, tax and other services, for which the Advisor is reimbursed directly by us. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated for any reason upon sixty days written notice by us or the Advisor. The Advisory Agreement expires on December 31 of each year; however, it is renewable by us, subject to a determination by the Independent Trustees that the Advisor’s performance has been satisfactory. The Advisor is entitled to certain advisory fees for its services. In December of 2013, based upon a review of our advisory fee and other general and administrative expenses, as compared to an industry peer group, the Advisory Agreement was renewed for 2014. See “Relationship with UHS and Related Party Transactions” in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Advisory Agreement and related fees.

The combined revenues generated from the leases on the UHS hospital facilities comprised approximately 27% and 30% of our consolidated revenues for the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately 29% and 30% of our consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Including 100% of the revenues generated at the unconsolidated LLCs in which we have various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 95%, the leases on the UHS hospital facilities accounted for approximately 22% of the combined consolidated and unconsolidated revenue for each of the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. In addition, twelve MOBs, that are either wholly or jointly-owned, include or will include tenants which are subsidiaries of UHS. The leases to the hospital facilities of UHS are guaranteed by UHS and cross-defaulted with one another.

22

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the Master Lease Document by and among us and certain subsidiaries of UHS, dated December 24, 1986 (the “Master Lease”), which governs the leases of all hospital properties with subsidiaries of UHS, UHS has the option to renew the leases at the lease terms described below by providing notice to us at least 90 days prior to the termination of the then current term. UHS also has the right to purchase the respective leased facilities at the end of the lease terms or any renewal terms at the appraised fair market value. In addition, UHS has rights of first refusal to: (i) purchase the respective leased facilities during and for 180 days after the lease terms at the same price, terms and conditions of any third-party offer, or; (ii) renew the lease on the respective leased facility at the end of, and for 180 days after, the lease term at the same terms and conditions pursuant to any third-party offer. In addition, the Master Lease, as amended during 2006, includes a change of control provision whereby UHS has the right, upon one month’s notice should a change of control of the Trust occur, to purchase any or all of the four leased hospital properties at their appraised fair market value.

During the third quarter of 2014, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS provided notification to us that, upon expiration of The Bridgeway’s current lease term in December, 2014, it intends to exercise its option to purchase the real property of the facility. We anticipate that the sale of The Bridgeway, a 103-bed behavioral health facility located in North Little Rock, Arkansas, will occur on December 31, 2014. Our revenues, net cash provided by operating activities and funds from operations have included approximately $1.1 million earned annually in connection with The Bridgeway’s lease. Pursuant to the terms of the lease, we and the wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS are both required to obtain appraisals of the property to determine its fair market value. Based upon the preliminary property appraisals obtained by each party, we estimate that the sales proceeds in connection with the divestiture of The Bridgeway will approximate $17.0 million to $17.5 million. Should the divestiture of The Bridgeway occur as outlined above, we estimate that our results of operations for the three and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2014 will include a gain on divestiture of approximately $12.6 million to $13.1 million.

In addition, UHS is currently negotiating with us regarding our potential ownership of the real property of two free-standing emergency departments located in Texas which are currently under construction and scheduled to be completed during the first quarter of 2015. Since these potential transactions are contingent upon the completion and execution of acquisition and lease agreements (subsidiaries of UHS are expected to operate the facilities), we can provide no assurance that these transactions will ultimately occur. Should they occur, pursuant to the terms of acquisition and lease agreements as currently contemplated, we estimate that the aggregate acquisition cost of these facilities will approximate $12.5 million to $13.0 million, and the aggregate rental revenues earned at the commencement of the leases will approximate $850,000 to $900,000 annually.

For additional disclosure related to our relationship with UHS, please refer to Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) and Related Party Transactions.

Results of Operations

Effective August 1, 2014, we purchased the minority ownership interests, ranging from 5% to 15%, held by third-party members in six LLCs in which we previously held noncontrolling majority ownership interests. As a result of these minority ownership purchases, we now own 100% of each of these six LLCs and our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 includes the revenues and expenses associated with each of these properties for the two month period ended September 30, 2014. Prior to August 1, 2014, these LLCs were accounted for on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the equity method, as discussed above.

Effective January 1, 2014, we purchased the 5% minority ownership interests held by third-party members in Palmdale Medical Properties and Sparks Medical Properties, two LLCs in which we previously held noncontrolling majority ownership interests. As a result of these minority ownership purchases, we now own 100% of each of these LLCs and our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 includes the revenues and expenses associated with each of these properties. Prior to January 1, 2014, these LLCs were accounted for on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the equity method. Prior to our purchase of the minority ownership interest in Palmdale, and as a result of a master lease agreement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS which expired on July 1, 2013, Palmdale was previously included in our financial statements on a consolidated basis during the period of January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013, and on an unconsolidated basis during the period of July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013. The tables below provide supplemental financial information related to each of the above-mentioned entities for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013, as reflected on a financial statement presentation basis similar to the presentation applied for each entity for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014. There was no material impact to our net income as a result of the consolidation of these LLCs.

23

Table of Contents

The tables below reflect the “As Adjusted” Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, reflecting the following:

Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2013:

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013:

24

Table of Contents

For the three months ended September 30, 2014, net income was $28.1 million as compared to $3.3 million during the comparable prior year quarter. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, net income was $35.3 million as compared to $9.7 million during the comparable nine-month period of the prior year.

The $24.8 million increase in net income during the third quarter of 2014, as compared to the comparable prior year quarter, was attributable to:

The increase in net income of $25.7 million during the first nine months of 2014, as compared to the first nine months of 2013, was primarily attributable to:

Total revenues increased by $262,000 (“As Adjusted”) during the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the comparable period of 2013, and $904,000 (“As Adjusted”) during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the

25

Table of Contents

comparable period of 2013. The increases in revenues during the third quarter and the first nine months of 2014, as compared to the comparable periods of 2013, were primarily due to: (i) the revenues generated at MOBs acquired during 2013 and 2014; (ii) an increase in bonus rental revenue, as mentioned above, and; (iii) other combined net changes at existing properties.

Included in our other operating expenses are expenses related to the consolidated medical office buildings, which totaled $4.1 million and $3.9 million (“As Adjusted”) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $11.4 million and $11.0 million (“As Adjusted”) for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. A large portion of the expenses associated with our consolidated medical office buildings is passed on directly to the tenants either directly as tenant reimbursements of common area maintenance expenses or included in base rental amounts. Tenant reimbursements for operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the same period the related expenses are incurred and are included as tenant reimbursement revenue in our condensed consolidated statements of income.

Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a widely recognized measure of performance for Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”). We believe that FFO and FFO per diluted share, and adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”) and AFFO per diluted share, which are non-GAAP financial measures (“GAAP” is Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America), are helpful to our investors as measures of our operating performance. We compute FFO, as reflected below, in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not compute FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or that interpret the NAREIT definition differently than we interpret the definition. AFFO was also computed for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, as reflected below, since we believe it is helpful to our investors since it adjusts for the effect of the transaction costs related to acquisitions. FFO/AFFO do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered to be an alternative to net income determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, FFO/AFFO should not be used as: (i) an indication of our financial performance determined in accordance with GAAP; (ii) an alternative to cash flow from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP; (iii) a measure of our liquidity, or; (iv) an indicator of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions to shareholders.

26

Table of Contents

Below is a reconciliation of our reported net income to FFO and AFFO for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):

Our FFO increased by $38,000 and $414,000, respectively, during the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the comparable periods of 2013. The $38,000 increase in FFO during the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the third quarter of 2013 was attributable to: (i) the $24.8 million increase in net income, as discussed above; (ii) minus the $25.1 million aggregate gain, as discussed above, plus; (iii) a $293,000 net increase in the depreciation and amortization expense incurred at our properties (on a consolidated and unconsolidated basis). The $414,000 increase in FFO during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine-month period of 2013 was primarily attributable to: (i) the $25.7 million increase in net income, as discussed above; (ii) minus the $25.4 million aggregate gain, as discussed above, plus; (iii) a $171,000 net increase in the depreciation and amortization expense incurred at our properties (on a consolidated and unconsolidated basis).

Our AFFO increased by $197,000 and $545,000, respectively, during the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the comparable periods of 2013. The $197,000 increase in AFFO during the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the third quarter of 2013 was due to the $38,000 increase in FFO, as discussed above, plus a net increase of $159,000 in transaction costs. The $545,000 increase in AFFO during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the comparable period of 2013, is due to the $414,000 increase in FFO, as discussed above, plus a net increase of $131,000 in transaction costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $23.9 million and $23.0 million during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The $883,000 net increase was attributable to:

Net cash used in investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $19.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to $12.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, we funded: (i) $1.2 million in equity investments in various unconsolidated LLCs; (ii) $2.0 million in capital additions to real estate investments primarily for tenant improvements at various MOBs; (iii) $15.6 million to acquire the real estate assets of three medical office buildings, as discussed above, and; (iv) $3.5 million (plus a note payable of $3.5 million to the previous third-party minority interest member) to acquire the minority interests in eight majority-owned LLCs in two separate transactions effective August 1, 2014 and January 1, 2014, as discussed above. In addition, during the

27

Table of Contents

nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, we received: (i) $2.3 million of cash distribution proceeds in connection with refinancing of third-party debt by the LLC that owns the Texoma Medical Plaza in which we have a 95% non-controlling equity interest, and; (ii) $1.0 million of cash distributions in excess of income from our unconsolidated LLCs.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013, we funded: (i) $2.6 million in equity investments in various unconsolidated LLCs; (ii) $4.4 million in advances in the form of member loans to unconsolidated LLCs; (iii) $2.3 million in capital additions to real estate investments primarily for tenant improvements at various MOBs, and; (iv) $4.7 million to acquire the real estate assets of two medical office buildings, as dicussed above. In addition, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013, we received: (i) $1.8 million of cash distributions in excess of income from our unconsolidated LLCs, and; (ii) $109,000 in repayments of advances previously made to unconsolidated LLCs.

Net cash used in financing activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $6.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to $10.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, we: (i) received $26.8 million of additional net borrowings on our revolving line of credit, and; (ii) generated $3.1 million of net cash from the issuance of shares of beneficial interest, (as discussed below). Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we paid: (i) $11.5 million on mortgage and other notes payable that are non-recourse to us, (including the pay-off of the $9.1 million outstanding mortgage balance on the Summerlin Hospital Medical Office Building I utilizing funds borrowed under our revolving credit facility), and; (ii) $24.3 million of dividends.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013, we: (i) received $15.4 million of additional net borrowings on our revolving line of credit; (ii) received $11.2 million of proceeds related to a new mortgage note payable (refinance) that is non-recourse to us, and; (iii) generated $194,000 of net cash from the issuance of shares of beneficial interest. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we paid: (i) $13.7 million on mortgage and other notes payable that are non-recourse to us (including the pay-off of a mortgage note payable that was refinanced during the first quarter of 2013, resulting in the above-mentioned $11.2 million of mortgage financing proceeds to us); (ii) $95,000 of financing costs on mortgage and other notes payable, and; (iii) $23.7 million of dividends.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, we commenced an at-the-market (“ATM”) equity issuance program, pursuant to the terms of which we may sell, from time-to-time, common shares of our beneficial interest up to an aggregate sales price of $50 million to or through Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”), as sales agent and/or principal. Pursuant to this ATM program, during the first nine months of 2014, we issued 57,410 shares at an average price of $42.67 per share (all issued during the first quarter of 2014). Including the shares issued at the end of the fourth quarter of 2013, which settled during the first quarter of 2014, the ATM program generated approximately $2.9 million of net cash proceeds, (net of approximately $182,000, consisting of compensation of approximately $76,000 to Merrill Lynch, as well as approximately $106,000 of other various fees and expenses) during the first nine months of 2014. Approximately $592,000 of net cash proceeds (net of approximately $15,000 of compensation to Merrill Lynch) related to the shares issued late in the fourth quarter of 2013 were received by us during the first quarter of 2014. Since inception of this program, we have issued 212,123 shares at an average price of $41.97 per share, which generated approximately $8.4 million of cash proceeds (net of approximately $537,000, consisting of compensation of approximately $222,000 to Merrill Lynch, as well as approximately $315,000 of other various fees and expenses).

Additional cash flow and dividends paid information for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:

As indicated on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows, we generated net cash provided by operating activities of $23.9 million and $23.0 million during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As also indicated on our statement of cash flows, noncash expenses such as depreciation and amortization expense, restricted/stock-based compensation expense as well as the gains recorded during the first nine months of 2014, are the primary differences between our net income and net cash provided by operating activities during each period. In addition, as reflected in the cash flows from investing activities section, we received $1.0 million and $1.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, of cash distributions in excess of income from various unconsolidated LLCs which represents our share of the net cash flow distributions from these entities. These cash distributions in excess of income represent operating cash flows net of capital expenditures and debt repayments made by the LLCs.

We generated $24.9 million and $24.8 million of net cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to the operating activities of our properties recorded on a consolidated and an unconsolidated basis. We paid dividends of $24.3 million and $23.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During the first nine months of 2014, the $24.9 million of net cash generated related to the operating activities of our properties was approximately

28

Table of Contents

$600,000 more than the $24.3 million of dividends paid during the period. During the first nine months of 2013, the $24.8 million of net cash generated related to operating activities of our properties was approximately $1.0 million more than the $23.7 million of dividends paid during the period.

As indicated in the cash flows from investing activities and cash flows from financing activities sections of the statements of cash flows, there were various other sources and uses of cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Therefore, the funding source for our dividend payments is not wholly dependent on the operating cash flow generated by our properties in any given period. Rather, our dividends, as well as our capital reinvestments into our existing properties, acquisitions of real property and other investments are funded based upon the aggregate net cash inflows or outflows from all sources and uses of cash from the properties we own either in whole or through LLCs, as outlined above.

In determining and monitoring our dividend level on a quarterly basis, our management and Board of Trustees consider many factors in determining the amount of dividends to be paid each period. These considerations primarily include: (i) the minimum required amount of dividends to be paid in order to maintain our REIT status; (ii) the current and projected operating results of our properties, including those owned in LLCs, and; (iii) our future capital commitments and debt repayments, including those of our LLCs. Based upon the information discussed above, as well as consideration of projections and forecasts of our future operating cash flows, management and the Board of Trustees have determined that our operating cash flows have been sufficient to fund our dividend payments. Future dividend levels will be determined based upon the factors outlined above with consideration given to our projected future results of operations.

Included in the various sources of cash were: (i) funds generated from the repayments of advances made from us to LLCs ($109,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013); (ii) cash distributions of refinancing proceeds from an LLC ($2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014); (iii) net borrowings on our revolving credit agreement ($26.8 million and $15.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively); (iv) proceeds from mortgage notes payable ($11.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013), and; (v) net cash generated in connection with the issuance of shares of beneficial interest ($3.1 million and $194,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively).

In addition to the dividends paid, the following were also included in the various uses of cash: (i) investments in LLCs ($1.2 million and $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively); (ii) advances made to LLCs ($4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013); (iii) net real estate additions ($2.0 million and $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively); (iv) repayments of mortgage and other notes payable ($11.5 million and $13.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively); (v) financing cost paid on mortgage and other notes payable ($95,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013); (vi) acquisition of minority interests in majority-owned LLCs ($3.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014), and; (vii) acquisitions of medical office buildings ($15.6 million and $4.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively).

We expect to finance all capital expenditures and acquisitions and pay dividends utilizing internally generated and additional funds. Additional funds may be obtained through: (i) borrowings under our existing $150 million revolving credit facility agreement (which has $23.3 million of available borrowing capacity, net of outstanding borrowings and letters of credit, as of September 30, 2014); (ii) the issuance of equity pursuant to an at-the-market equity issuance program; (iii) borrowings under or refinancing of existing third-party debt pursuant to mortgage and construction loan agreements entered into by our LLCs, and/or; (iv) the issuance of other long-term debt.

We believe that our operating cash flows, cash and cash equivalents, available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility and access to the capital markets provide us with sufficient capital resources to fund our operating, investing and financing requirements for the next twelve months, including providing sufficient capital to allow us to make distributions necessary to enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the event we need to access the capital markets or other sources of financing, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing on acceptable terms or within an acceptable time. Our inability to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us could have a material unfavorable impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Credit facilities and mortgage debt

In July, 2011, we entered into a $150 million revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) which is scheduled to expire on July 24, 2015. We are in the early stages of renegotiating our Credit Agreement and expect to complete a replacement credit facility within the next three months. We can provide no assurance that a replacement credit facility will be obtained on acceptable terms. The Credit Agreement includes a $50 million sub limit for letters of credit and a $20 million sub limit for swingline/short-term loans. The Credit Agreement also provides an option to increase the total facility borrowing capacity by an additional $50 million, subject to lender agreement. Borrowings made pursuant to the Credit Agreement will bear interest, at our option, at one, two, three, or six month LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.50% or at the Base Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.50%. The Credit Agreement defines “Base Rate” as the greatest of: (a) the administrative

29

Table of Contents

agent’s prime rate; (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, and; (c) one month LIBOR plus 1%. A fee of 0.30% to 0.50% will be charged on the unused portion of the commitment. The margins over LIBOR, Base Rate and the commitment fee are based upon our ratio of debt to total capital. At September 30, 2014, the applicable margin over the LIBOR rate was 2.00%, the margin over the Base Rate was 1.00%, and the commitment fee was 0.35%.

At September 30, 2014, we had $120.5 million of outstanding borrowings and $6.3 million of letters of credit outstanding against our revolving credit agreement. We had $23.3 million of available borrowing capacity, net of the outstanding borrowings and letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2014. There are no compensating balance requirements.

On July 1, 2014, we borrowed an additional $9.1 million under our revolving credit agreement, which was utilized to repay the outstanding mortgage balance on the Summerlin Hospital Medical Office Building I. The mortgage loan on this property matured on July 1, 2014.

Covenants relating to the Agreement require the maintenance of a minimum tangible net worth and specified financial ratios, limit our ability to incur additional debt, limit the aggregate amount of mortgage receivables and limit our ability to increase dividends in excess of 95% of cash available for distribution, unless additional distributions are required to comply with the applicable section of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and related regulations governing real estate investment trusts. We are in compliance with all of the covenants at September 30, 2014. We also believe that we would remain in compliance if the full amount of our commitment was borrowed.

The following table includes a summary of the required compliance ratios, giving effect to the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement (dollar amounts in thousands):

We have sixteen mortgages, all of which are non-recourse to us, included on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2014, with a combined outstanding balance of $123.7 million (excluding net debt premium, of $584,000 at September 30, 2014). The following table summarizes our outstanding mortgages, excluding net debt premium, at September 30, 2014 (amounts in thousands):

30

Table of Contents

During the third quarter of 2013, we entered into an interest rate cap on a total notional amount of $10 million whereby we paid a premium of $136,000. During the first quarter of 2014, we entered into two additional interest rate cap agreements on a total notional amount of $20 million whereby we paid premiums of $134,500. In exchange for the premium payments, the counterparties agreed to pay us the difference between 1.50% and one-month LIBOR if one-month LIBOR rises above 1.50% during the term of the cap. The caps expire on January 13, 2017.

31

Table of Contents

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2014, we are party to certain off balance sheet arrangements consisting of standby letters of credit and equity and debt financing commitments. Our outstanding letters of credit at September 30, 2014 totaled $6.3 million consisting of: (i) $2.1 million related to Centennial Hills Medical Properties; (ii) $1.3 million related to Palmdale Medical Properties; (iii) $1.3 million related to Banburry Medical Properties; (iv) $1.1 million related to FTX MOB Phase II, LP; and; (v) $478,000 related to Arlington Medical Properties.

Acquisition and Divestiture Activity

Please see Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for completed transactions.

Reference is made to Item 7A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 which included two additional interest rate cap agreements entered into during the first quarter of 2014. Otherwise, there have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures during the first nine months of 2014.

As of September 30, 2014, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Trust’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), we performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”).

Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management on a timely basis in order to comply with our disclosure obligations under the 1934 Act and the SEC rules thereunder.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors during the third quarter of 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

32

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes a listing of risk factors to be considered by investors in our securities. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

(a.) Exhibits:

33

Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

34

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

35