UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST - Quarter Report: 2018 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018

OR

For the transition period from                      to                      

Commission file number 1-9321

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (610) 265-0688

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Number of common shares of beneficial interest outstanding at July 31, 2018—13,745,138

HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

INDEX

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is for the quarter ended June 30, 2018. In this Quarterly Report, “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Trust” refer to Universal Health Realty Income Trust and its subsidiaries.

As disclosed in this Quarterly Report, including in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) and Related Party Transactions, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS (UHS of Delaware, Inc.) serves as our Advisor pursuant to the terms of an annually renewable Advisory Agreement dated December 24, 1986. Our officers are all employees of UHS through its wholly-owned subsidiary, UHS of Delaware, Inc. In addition, three of our hospital facilities are leased to subsidiaries of UHS, and subsidiaries of UHS are tenants of seventeen medical office buildings or free-standing emergency departments, that are either wholly or jointly-owned by us. Any reference to “UHS” or “UHS facilities” in this report is referring to Universal Health Services, Inc.’s subsidiaries, including UHS of Delaware, Inc.

In this Quarterly Report, the term “revenues” does not include the revenues of the four unconsolidated limited liability companies (“LLCs”) in which we have various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 95%. We currently account for our share of the income/loss from these investments by the equity method (see Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein).

Part I. Financial Information

Item I. Financial Statements

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2018

(unaudited)

(1) General

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is for the quarter ended June 30, 2018. In this Quarterly Report, “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Trust” refer to Universal Health Realty Income Trust and its subsidiaries.

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the term “revenues” does not include the revenues of the unconsolidated LLCs in which we have various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 95%.  As of June 30, 2018, we had investments in four jointly-owned LLCs/LPs which own medical office buildings, all of which are accounted for by the equity method (see Note 5). These LLCs are included in our financial statements for all periods presented on an unconsolidated basis since they are not variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary, nor do we hold a controlling voting interest.

The financial statements included herein have been prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which, in our opinion, are necessary to fairly present results for the interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the accompanying disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements, the notes thereto and accounting policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain prior period amounts on our statement of cash flows have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation in connection with our adoption of ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash.

(2) Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) and Related Party Transactions

Leases: We commenced operations in 1986 by purchasing properties of certain subsidiaries from UHS and immediately leasing the properties back to the respective subsidiaries. Most of the leases were entered into at the time we commenced operations and provided for initial terms of 13 to 15 years with up to six additional 5-year renewal terms. The current base rentals and lease and rental terms for each of the three hospital facilities leased to subsidiaries of UHS are provided below. The base rents are paid monthly and each lease also provides for additional or bonus rents which are computed and paid on a quarterly basis based upon a computation that compares current quarter revenue to a corresponding quarter in the base year. The three hospital leases with subsidiaries of UHS are unconditionally guaranteed by UHS and are cross-defaulted with one another.

The combined revenues generated from the leases on the UHS hospital facilities accounted for approximately 20% and 22% of our consolidated revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and approximately 21% and 23% of our consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In addition, we have seventeen medical office buildings (“MOBs”), or free-standing emergency departments (“FEDs”), that are either wholly or jointly-owned by us, that include tenants which are subsidiaries of UHS.  The aggregate revenues generated from UHS-related tenants comprised approximately 28% and 32% of our consolidated revenues during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and approximately 30% and 32% of our consolidated revenues during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Pursuant to the Master Lease Document by and among us and certain subsidiaries of UHS, dated December 24, 1986 (the “Master Lease”), which governs the leases of all hospital properties with subsidiaries of UHS, UHS has the option to renew the leases at the lease terms described below by providing notice to us at least 90 days prior to the termination of the then current term. UHS also has the right to purchase the respective leased facilities at the end of the lease terms or any renewal terms at the appraised fair market value. In addition, the Master Lease, as amended during 2006, includes a change of control provision whereby UHS has the right, upon one month’s notice should a change of control of the Trust occur, to purchase any or all of the three leased hospital properties listed below at their appraised fair market value. Additionally, UHS has rights of first refusal to: (i) purchase the respective leased facilities during and for 180 days after the lease terms at the same price, terms and conditions of any third-party offer, or; (ii) renew the lease on the respective leased facility at the end of, and for 180 days after, the lease term at the same terms and conditions pursuant to any third-party offer.

In June, 2018, McAllen Medical Center, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, provided notice to us, exercising the 5-year renewal option on their lease.  The renewal extended the lease term on this facility, at the existing lease rate, to December, 2026.

7

The table below details the existing lease terms and renewal options for our three acute care hospitals operated by wholly-owned subsidiaries of UHS:

Management cannot predict whether the leases with subsidiaries of UHS, which have renewal options at existing lease rates or fair market value lease rates, or any of our other leases, will be renewed at the end of their lease term. If the leases are not renewed at their current rates or the fair market value lease rates, we would be required to find other operators for those facilities and/or enter into leases on terms potentially less favorable to us than the current leases. In addition, if subsidiaries of UHS exercise their options to purchase the respective leased hospital or FED facilities upon expiration of the lease terms, our future revenues could decrease if we were unable to earn a favorable rate of return on the sale proceeds received, as compared to the rental revenue currently earned pursuant to the these leases.  

In April, 2017, the recently constructed Henderson Medical Plaza MOB received its certificate of occupancy. Henderson Medical Plaza is located on the campus of the Henderson Hospital Medical Center, a newly constructed acute care hospital that is owned and operated by a subsidiary of UHS and was completed and opened during the fourth quarter of 2016.  A ground lease has been executed between the limited liability company that owns the MOB and a subsidiary of UHS, the terms of which include a seventy-five year lease term with two, ten-year renewal options at the lessee’s option at an adjusting lease rate. We have invested net cash of approximately $13.0 million on the development and construction of this MOB as of June 30, 2018.

Advisory Agreement:    UHS of Delaware, Inc. (the “Advisor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, serves as Advisor to us under an Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) dated December 24, 1986. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is obligated to present an investment program to us, to use its best efforts to obtain investments suitable for such program (although it is not obligated to present any particular investment opportunity to us), to provide administrative services to us and to conduct our day-to-day affairs. All transactions between us and UHS must be approved by the Trustees who are unaffiliated with UHS (the “Independent Trustees”). In performing its services under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor may utilize independent professional services, including accounting, legal, tax and other services, for which the Advisor is reimbursed directly by us. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated for any reason upon sixty days written notice by us or the Advisor. The Advisory Agreement expires on December 31 of each year; however, it is renewable by us, subject to a determination by the Independent Trustees, that the Advisor’s performance has been satisfactory. Our advisory fee is 0.70% of our average invested real estate assets, as derived from our consolidated balance sheet. In December of 2017, based upon a review of our advisory fee and other general and administrative expenses as compared to an industry peer group, the Advisory Agreement was renewed for 2018 pursuant to the same terms as the Advisory Agreement in place since 2013.

The average real estate assets for advisory fee calculation purposes exclude certain items from our consolidated balance sheet such as, among other things, accumulated depreciation, cash and cash equivalents, base and bonus rent receivables, deferred charges and other assets. The advisory fee is payable quarterly, subject to adjustment at year-end based upon our audited financial statements. In addition, the Advisor is entitled to an annual incentive fee equal to 20% of the amount by which cash available for distribution to shareholders for each year, as defined in the Advisory Agreement, exceeds 15% of our equity as shown on our consolidated balance sheet, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles without reduction for return of capital dividends. The Advisory Agreement defines cash available for distribution to shareholders as net cash flow from operations less deductions for, among other things, amounts required to discharge our debt and liabilities and reserves for replacement and capital improvements to our properties and investments. No incentive fees were paid at any time since our inception since the incentive fee requirements were not achieved. Advisory fees incurred and paid (or payable) to UHS amounted to $948,000 and $874,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and were based upon average invested real estate assets of $542 million and $499 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  Advisory fees incurred and paid (or payable) to UHS amounted to $1.9 million and $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and were based upon average invested real estate assets of $529 million and $497 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively

Officers and Employees: Our officers are all employees of a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS and although as of June 30, 2018 we had no salaried employees, our officers do typically receive annual stock-based compensation awards in the form of restricted stock.

8

In special circumstances, if warranted and deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees, our officers may also receive one-time special compensation awards in the form of restricted stock and/or cash bonuses.

Share Ownership: At each of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, UHS owned 5.7%, of our outstanding shares of beneficial interest.

SEC reporting requirements of UHS: UHS is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to file annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. Since the aggregate revenues generated from the UHS-related tenants comprised 28% and 32% of our consolidated revenues during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and 30% and 32% of our consolidated revenues during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and since a subsidiary of UHS is our Advisor, you are encouraged to obtain the publicly available filings for Universal Health Services, Inc. from the SEC’s website. These filings are the sole responsibility of UHS and are not incorporated by reference herein.

(3) Dividends

Dividends:

We declared dividends of $9.2 million, or $.67 per share, during the second quarter of 2018, which were paid on July 3, 2018.  We declared and paid dividends of $9.0 million, or $.66 per share, during the second quarter of 2017. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, we declared dividends of $18.3 million, or $1.335 per share, $9.2 million of which was paid on July 3, 2018. We declared and paid dividends of $17.9 million, or $1.315 per share, during the six-month period ended June 30, 2017.

(4) Acquisitions and Dispositions

Six Months Ended June 30, 2018:

Acquisitions:

In June, 2018, we acquired the Beaumont Medical Sleep Center Building located in Southfield, Michigan for a purchase price of approximately $4.0 million.  This building is 100% leased under the terms of a triple net lease with a remaining initial lease term of approximately 9.5 years at the time of purchase, with two, five year renewal options.

Dispositions:

There were no dispositions during the first six months of 2018.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017:

Acquisitions:

 There were no acquisitions during the first six months of 2017.

Disposition:

During March, 2017, Arlington Medical Properties, LLC, a formerly jointly-owned limited liability company in which we held an 85% noncontrolling ownership interest, sold the real estate assets of St. Mary’s Professional Office Building (“St. Mary’s”) as part of a series of planned tax deferred like-kind exchange transactions pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.  St. Mary’s is a multi-tenant medical office building located in Reno, Nevada.  A third party member owned the remaining 15% of Arlington Medical Properties LLC, which we acquired prior to the divestiture of St. Mary’s for a purchase price of $7.9 million. The divestiture of St. Mary’s generated an aggregate of approximately $57.3 million of net cash proceeds to us (approximately $11.3 million of which was held as restricted cash by a qualified 1031 exchange intermediary until the third quarter of 2017).  These proceeds, which were net of closing costs and the purchase price paid for the minority member’s ownership interest in the LLC, include repayment to us of a $21.4 million member loan.  Our results of operations for the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 included a net gain of $27.2 million (net of related transaction costs) recorded in connection with this transaction.

(5) Summarized Financial Information of Equity Affiliates

In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) standards and guidance relating to accounting for investments and real estate ventures, we account for our unconsolidated investments in LLCs/LPs which we do not control using the equity method.  The third-party members in these investments have equal voting rights with regards to issues such as, but not limited to: (i) divestiture of property; (ii) annual budget approval, and; (iii) financing commitments. These investments, which represent 33% to 95% non-controlling ownership interests, are recorded initially at our cost and subsequently adjusted for our net equity in the net income, cash contributions to, and distributions from, the investments. Pursuant to certain agreements, allocations of sales proceeds

9

and profits and losses of some of the LLC investments may be allocated disproportionately as compared to ownership interests after specified preferred return rate thresholds have been satisfied.

In the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, distributions and equity in net income are presented net as cash flows from operating activities. Cumulative distributions received exceeding cumulative equity in earnings represent returns of investments and are classified as cash flows from investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

At June 30, 2018, we have non-controlling equity investments or commitments in four jointly-owned LLCs/LPs which own MOBs. As of June 30, 2018, we accounted for these LLCs/LPs on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the equity method since they are not variable interest entities and we do not have a controlling voting interest. The majority of these entities are joint-ventures between us and non-related parties that hold minority ownership interests in the entities. Each entity is generally self-sustained from a cash flow perspective and generates sufficient cash flow to meet its operating cash flow requirements and service the third-party debt (if applicable) that is non-recourse to us. Although there is typically no ongoing financial support required from us to these entities since they are cash-flow sufficient, we may, from time to time, provide funding for certain purposes such as, but not limited to, significant capital expenditures, leasehold improvements and debt financing. Although we are not obligated to do so, if approved by us at our sole discretion, additional cash fundings are typically advanced as equity or member loans. These entities maintain property insurance on the properties.

 The following property table represents the four LLCs in which we own a noncontrolling interest and were accounted for under the equity method as of June 30, 2018:

Below are the condensed combined statements of income (unaudited) for the LLCs/LPs accounted for under the equity method during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.  The six months ended June 30, 2017 include the financial results of Arlington Medical Properties, LLC, through the March 13, 2017 divestiture date.  

10

Below are the condensed combined balance sheets (unaudited) for the four above-mentioned LLCs that were accounted for under the equity method as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

As of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, aggregate principal amounts due on mortgage notes payable by unconsolidated LLCs, which are accounted for under the equity method and are non-recourse to us, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Pursuant to the operating and/or partnership agreements of the four LLCs/LPs in which we continue to hold non-controlling ownership interests, the third-party member and/or the Trust, at any time, potentially subject to certain conditions, have the right to make an offer (“Offering Member”) to the other member(s) (“Non-Offering Member”) in which it either agrees to: (i) sell the entire ownership interest of the Offering Member to the Non-Offering Member (“Offer to Sell”) at a price as determined by the Offering Member (“Transfer Price”), or; (ii) purchase the entire ownership interest of the Non-Offering Member (“Offer to Purchase”) at the equivalent proportionate Transfer Price. The Non-Offering Member has 60 to 90 days to either: (i) purchase the entire ownership interest of the Offering Member at the Transfer Price, or; (ii) sell its entire ownership interest to the Offering Member at the equivalent proportionate Transfer Price. The closing of the transfer must occur within 60 to 90 days of the acceptance by the Non-Offering Member.

(6) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which adds or clarifies guidance of the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, and ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash, which requires an entity to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows.  We adopted these ASUs by applying a retrospective transition method which requires a reclassification of our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period ending June 30, 2017. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in our Consolidated Balance Sheets to the total amount shown in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

11

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and, among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America “GAAP”) for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. The FASB also issued an Exposure Draft on January 5, 2018 proposing to amend ASU 2016-02, which would provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying assets, to not separate non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component, if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02 and the related Exposure Draft are not effective for us until January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance and the impact to us, as both lessor and lessee, on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. We adopted the standard on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective approach, which requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the date of adoption.   ASU 2014-09 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While ASU 2014-09 specifically references contracts with customers, it may apply to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate or equipment.  The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and no cumulative adjustment was recorded upon adoption, as a substantial portion of our revenue consists of rental income from leasing arrangements, which is specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09.

Our revenues consist primarily of rentals received from tenants, which are comprised of minimum rent (base rentals) and bonus rentals and reimbursements from tenants for their pro-rata share of expenses such as common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and utilities.  We apply FASB ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” with respect to tenant reimbursement and other property income, which totaled $2.8 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $5.5 million and $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  The 2018 three and six month tenant reimbursement and other property income amounts also include a $1.7 million early lease termination fee recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2018. Tenant reimbursements for operating expenses are accrued as revenue and generally due monthly from tenants.  Since payments with respect to tenant reimbursement income are generally due monthly, no contract assets or liabilities have been recognized.  Revenue consisting of rental income from leasing arrangements are specifically excluded from FASB ASC Topic 606.

(7) Debt and Financial Instruments

Debt:

Management routinely monitors and analyzes the Trust’s capital structure in an effort to maintain the targeted balance among capital resources including the level of borrowings pursuant to our $300 million revolving credit agreement, the level of borrowings pursuant to non-recourse mortgage debt secured by the real property of our properties and our level of equity including consideration of additional equity issuances.  This ongoing analysis considers factors such as the current debt market and interest rate environment, the current/projected occupancy and financial performance of our properties, the current loan-to-value ratio of our properties, the Trust’s current stock price, the capital resources required for anticipated acquisitions and the expected capital to be generated by anticipated divestitures. This analysis, together with consideration of the Trust’s current balance of revolving credit agreement borrowings, non-recourse mortgage borrowings and equity, assists management in deciding which capital resource to utilize when events such as refinancing of specific debt components occur or additional funds are required to finance the Trust’s growth.

On March 27, 2018, we entered into a revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) which, among other things, increased our borrowing capacity by $50 million to $300 million and extended the maturity date from our previously existing facility. The replacement Credit Agreement, which is scheduled to mature in March, 2022, includes a $40 million sublimit for letters of credit and a $30 million sub limit for swingline/short-term loans.  The Credit Agreement also provides for options to extend the maturity date for two additional six month periods. Additionally, the Credit Agreement includes an option to increase the total facility borrowing capacity up to an additional $50 million, subject to lender agreement.  Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Trust. In addition, borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured by first priority security interests in and liens on all equity interests in certain of the Trust’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. Borrowings made pursuant to the Credit Agreement will bear interest, at our option, at one, two, three, or six month LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.10% to 1.35% or at the Base Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.10% to 0.35%. The Credit Agreement defines “Base Rate” as the greater of: (a) the administrative agent’s prime rate; (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 1/2 of 1%, and; (c) one month LIBOR plus 1%.  A facility fee of 0.15% to 0.35% will be charged on the total commitment of the Credit Agreement. The margins over LIBOR, Base Rate and the facility fee are based upon our total leverage ratio.  At June 30, 2018, the applicable margin over the LIBOR rate was 1.15%, the margin over the Base Rate was 0.15%, and the facility fee was 0.20%.  

12

At June 30, 2018, we had $197.3 million of outstanding borrowings under our Credit Agreement and $102.7 million of available borrowing capacity.  There are no compensating balance requirements.  As disclosed below, during the first six months of 2018, we repaid an aggregate of $21.7 million on three mortgages utilizing borrowings under our Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including limitations on certain indebtedness, liens, acquisitions and other investments, fundamental changes, asset dispositions and dividends and other distributions. The Credit Agreement also contains restrictive covenants regarding the Trust’s ratio of total debt to total assets, the fixed charge coverage ratio, the ratio of total secured debt to total asset value, the ratio of total unsecured debt to total unencumbered asset value, and minimum tangible net worth, as well as customary events of default, the occurrence of which may trigger an acceleration of amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement. We are in compliance with all of the covenants at June 30, 2018. We also believe that we would remain in compliance if the full amount of our commitment was borrowed.

The following table includes a summary of the required compliance ratios, giving effect to the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement (dollar amounts in thousands):

As indicated on the following table, we have eight mortgages, all of which are non-recourse to us, included on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018 (amounts in thousands):

On February 13, 2018, upon its maturity, a $4.1 million floating rate mortgage loan on the Sparks Medical Building/Vista Medical Terrace was fully repaid utilizing borrowings under our Credit Agreement.  

13

On April 5, 2018, upon its maturity, a $9.7 million floating rate mortgage loan on the Centennial Hills Medical Office Building was fully repaid utilizing borrowings under our Credit Agreement.

On May 2, 2018, upon its maturity, a $7.9 million fixed rate mortgage loan on the Rosenberg Children’s Medical Plaza was fully repaid utilizing borrowings under our Credit Agreement.  

The mortgages are secured by the real property of the buildings as well as property leases and rents. The eight mortgages outstanding as of June 30, 2018 had a combined fair value of approximately $53.0 million. The fair value of our debt was computed based upon quotes received from financial institutions.  We consider these to be “level 2” in the fair value hierarchy as outlined in the authoritative guidance for disclosure in connection with debt instruments.  Changes in market rates on our fixed rate debt impacts the fair value of debt, but it has no impact on interest incurred or cash flow.

At December 31, 2017, we had eleven mortgages, all of which were non-recourse to us, included in our consolidated balance sheet. The combined outstanding balance of these eleven mortgages was $75.7 million and had a combined fair value of approximately $76.3 million.

Financial Instruments:

During the second quarter of 2016, we entered into an interest rate cap on the total notional amount of $30 million whereby we paid a premium of $115,000.  In exchange for the premium payment, the counterparties agreed to pay us the difference between 1.50% and one-month LIBOR if one-month LIBOR rises above 1.50% during the term of the cap.  This interest rate cap became effective in January, 2017 and expires in March, 2019. From inception through June 30, 2018, we received or accrued approximately $39,000 in payments made to us by the counterparties (all received during the first six months of 2018) pursuant to the terms of these caps.

During the third quarter of 2016, we entered into an additional interest rate cap agreement on a total notional amount of $30 million whereby we paid a premium of $55,000.  In exchange for the premium payment, the counterparties agreed to pay us the difference between 1.5% and one-month LIBOR if one-month LIBOR rises above 1.5% during the term of the cap.  This interest rate cap became effective in October, 2016 and expires in March, 2019.  From inception through June 30, 2018, we received or accrued approximately $39,000 in payments made to us by the counterparties (all received during the first six months of 2018) pursuant to the terms of these caps.

(8) Segment Reporting

Our primary business is investing in and leasing healthcare and human service facilities through direct ownership or through joint ventures, which aggregate into a single reportable segment. We actively manage our portfolio of healthcare and human service facilities and may from time to time make decisions to sell lower performing properties not meeting our long-term investment objectives. The proceeds of sales are typically reinvested in new developments or acquisitions, which we believe will meet our planned rate of return. It is our intent that all healthcare and human service facilities will be owned or developed for investment purposes. Our revenue and net income are generated from the operation of our investment portfolio.

Our portfolio is located throughout the United States, however, we do not distinguish or group our operations on a geographical basis for purposes of allocating resources or measuring performance. We review operating and financial data for each property on an individual basis; therefore, we define an operating segment as our individual properties. Individual properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment based upon their similarities with regard to both the nature and economics of the facilities, tenants and operational processes, as well as long-term average financial performance.  No individual property meets the requirements necessary to be considered its own segment.

(9) Impact of Hurricane Harvey  

In late August, 2017, five of our medical office buildings listed below located in the Houston, Texas area incurred extensive water damage as a result of Hurricane Harvey. Until various times during the second quarter of 2018, these properties were temporarily closed and non-operational as we continued to reconstruct and restore them to operational condition. As of June 30, 2018, reconstruction on all of the occupied space in these properties has been completed and operations have resumed.

During 2018, pursuant to the terms of a global settlement with our commercial property insurance carrier, we received $5.5 million of additional insurance recovery proceeds bringing the aggregate hurricane-related insurance recoveries to $12.5 million.  The aggregate insurance proceeds recoveries, which are net of applicable deductibles, covered substantially all of the costs incurred related to the remediation, repair and reconstruction of each of these properties as well as business interruption recoveries for the lost income related to each of these properties during the period they were non-operational.

14

Our financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2018 include approximately $194,000 of business interruption insurance recovery proceeds. Our financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2018 include approximately $1.2 million of business interruption insurance recovery proceeds, covering the period of late August, 2017 through June 30, 2018, approximately $500,000 of which relates to 2017. These business interruption insurance recovery proceeds are included in net cash provided by operating activities in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018. Additionally, the six months ended June 30, 2018 includes approximately $4.5 million of hurricane insurance recoveries in excess of property damage write-downs, which are included in net cash provided by investing activities in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018.

Our properties damaged and temporarily closed from Hurricane Harvey were:

15

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that commenced operations in 1986. We invest in healthcare and human service related facilities currently including acute care hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals, sub-acute facilities, surgery centers, free-standing emergency departments, childcare centers and medical/office buildings. As of July 31, 2018, we have sixty-nine real estate investments located in twenty states consisting of:

Forward Looking Statements and Certain Risk Factors

You should carefully review all of the information contained in this Quarterly Report, and should particularly consider any risk factors that we set forth in this Quarterly Report and in other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In this Quarterly Report, we state our beliefs of future events and of our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify those so-called “forward-looking statements” by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “appears,” “projects” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense. You should be aware that those statements are only our predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating those statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 in Item 1A Risk Factors and in Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Forward Looking Statements. Those factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any of our forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking information is based on information available at the time and/or our good faith belief with respect to future events, and is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements. Such factors include, among other things, the following:  

16

17

It remains unclear what portions of the Legislation may remain, or whether any replacement or alternative programs may be created by any future legislation. Any such future repeal or replacement may have significant impact on the reimbursement for healthcare services generally, and may create reimbursement for services competing with the services offered by our hospitals. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the adoption of any future federal or state healthcare reform legislation will not have a negative financial impact on our hospitals, including their ability to compete with alternative healthcare services funded by such potential legislation, or for our hospitals to receive payment for services;

18

Given these uncertainties, risks and assumptions, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Our actual results and financial condition, including the operating results of our lessees and the facilities leased to subsidiaries of UHS, could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. We assume no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information, except as may be required by law. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

We consider our critical accounting policies to be those that require us to make significant judgments and estimates when we prepare our financial statements, including the following:

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Investments in Real Estate:  Purchase accounting is applied to the assets and liabilities related to all real estate investments acquired from third parties. In accordance with current accounting guidance, we account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets, which permits the capitalization of acquisition costs to the underlying assets. The fair value of the real estate acquired is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting primarily of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, and acquired ground leases, based in each case on their fair values. Loan premiums, in the case of above market rate loans, or loan discounts, in the case of below market loans, are recorded based on the fair value of any loans assumed in connection with acquiring the real estate.

The fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property are determined based on comparable land sales for land and replacement costs adjusted for physical and market obsolescence for the improvements. The fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property are also determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on management’s determination of the relative fair values of these assets. Management determines the as-if-vacant fair value of a property based on assumptions that a market participant would use, which is similar to methods used by independent appraisers. In addition, there is intangible value related to having tenants leasing space in the purchased property, which is referred to as in-place lease value. Such value results primarily from the buyer of a leased property avoiding the costs associated with leasing the property and also avoiding rent losses and unreimbursed operating expenses during the hypothetical lease-up period. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) estimated fair market lease rates from the perspective of a market participant for the corresponding in-place leases, measured, for above-market leases, over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease and, for below-market leases, over a period equal to the initial term plus any below market fixed rate renewal periods. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental

19

income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values, also referred to as acquired lease obligations, are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial terms of the respective leases.

Asset Impairment:    We review each of our properties for indicators that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. Examples of such indicators may include a significant decrease in the market price of the property, a change in the expected holding period for the property, a significant adverse change in how the property is being used or expected to be used based on the underwriting at the time of acquisition, an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or development of the property, or a history of operating or cash flow losses of the property. When such impairment indicators exist, we review an estimate of the future undiscounted net cash flows (excluding interest charges) expected to result from the real estate investment’s use and eventual disposition and compare that estimate to the carrying value of the property. We consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If our future undiscounted net cash flow evaluation indicates that we are unable to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. The evaluation of anticipated cash flows is highly subjective and is based in part on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results in future periods. Since cash flows on properties considered to be long-lived assets to be held and used are considered on an undiscounted basis to determine whether the carrying value of a property is recoverable, our strategy of holding properties over the long-term directly decreases the likelihood of their carrying values not being recoverable and therefore requiring the recording of an impairment loss. If our strategy changes or market conditions otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss may be recognized and such loss could be material. If we determine that the asset fails the recoverability test, the affected assets must be reduced to their fair value.

We generally estimate the fair value of rental properties utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis that includes projections of future revenues, expenses and capital improvement costs that a market participant would use based on the highest and best use of the asset, which is similar to the income approach that is commonly utilized by appraisers. In certain cases, we may supplement this analysis by obtaining outside broker opinions of value or third party appraisals.

In considering whether to classify a property as held for sale, we consider factors such as whether management has committed to a plan to sell the property, the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition for a price that is reasonable in relation to its current value, the sale of the property is probable, and actions required for management to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will made to the plan.  If all the criteria are met, we classify the property as held for sale.  Upon being classified as held for sale, depreciation and amortization related to the property ceases and it is recorded at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. The assets and related liabilities of the property are classified separately on the consolidated balance sheets for the most recent reporting period. Only those assets held for sale that constitute a strategic shift or that will have a major effect on our operations are classified as discontinued operations. 

An other than temporary impairment of an investment in an unconsolidated LLC is recognized when the carrying value of the investment is not considered recoverable based on evaluation of the severity and duration of the decline in value, including projected declines in cash flow. To the extent impairment has occurred, the excess carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value is charged to income.

Federal Income Taxes:    No provision has been made for federal income tax purposes since we qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and intend to continue to remain so qualified.   To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to shareholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal, state or local income tax on income that we distribute as dividends to our shareholders. We have historically distributed, and intend to continue to distribute, 100% of our annual REIT taxable income to our shareholders.

We are subject to a federal excise tax computed on a calendar year basis. The excise tax equals 4% of the amount by which 85% of our ordinary income plus 95% of any capital gain income for the calendar year exceeds cash distributions during the calendar year, as defined. No provision for excise tax has been reflected in the financial statements as no tax was due.

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of dividends to shareholders, will differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due to the differences for federal tax purposes in the cost basis of assets and in the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation and the recording of provision for investment losses.

20

Results of Operations

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, net income was $5.8 million, as compared to $4.0 million during the second quarter of 2017.  The $1.8 million increase was primarily attributable to:

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, net income was $15.4 million, as compared to $35.6 million during the six months of 2017.  The $20.2 million decrease was primarily attributable to:

Included in our other operating expenses are expenses related to the consolidated medical office buildings, which totaled $4.9 million and $4.4 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $9.6 million and $8.6 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  The increase in operating expenses during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the prior year periods, is partially due to: (i) the newly constructed medical office building which opened in April, 2017, and; (ii) approximately $400,000 of non-recurring repairs and remediation expenses incurred at one of our medical office buildings. A large portion of the expenses associated with our consolidated medical office buildings is passed on directly to the tenants either directly as tenant reimbursements of common area maintenance expenses or included in base rental amounts. Tenant reimbursements for operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the same period the related expenses are incurred and are included as tenant reimbursement revenue in our condensed consolidated statements of income

Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a widely recognized measure of performance for Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”). We believe that FFO and FFO per diluted share, which are non-GAAP financial measures, are helpful to our investors as measures of our operating performance. We compute FFO, as reflected on the attached Supplemental Schedules, in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not compute FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or that interpret the NAREIT definition differently than we interpret the definition. FFO adjusts for the effects of gains, such as gains on transactions and hurricane recovery proceeds in excess of damaged property write-downs during the periods presented.  We adjusted for hurricane insurance recovery proceeds in excess of damaged property write-downs since we believe that this gain is similar in nature and has the same characteristics as an adjustment for gains/losses resulting from the sale of depreciable property, which are required to be excluded from FFO under NAREIT’s definition. FFO does not

21

represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered to be an alternative to net income determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, FFO should not be used as: (i) an indication of our financial performance determined in accordance with GAAP; (ii) an alternative to cash flow from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP; (iii) a measure of our liquidity, or; (iv) an indicator of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions to shareholders.

Below is a reconciliation of our reported net income to FFO for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

Our FFO increased $1.6 million, or $.11 per diluted share, during the second quarter of 2018, as compared to the second quarter of 2017 due to: (i) an increase of $1.7 million, or $.12 per diluted share, resulting from the lease termination agreement entered into during the second quarter of 2018 in connection with a single tenant MOB located in Texas that terminated a lease that that was scheduled to expire in July, 2020; (ii) a decrease of approximately $400,000, or $.02 per diluted share, resulting from the non-recurring repairs and remediation expenses incurred at one of our medical office buildings, and; (iii) other combined net increase of approximately $300,000, or $.01 per diluted share, due to increased net income generated at various properties, including properties acquired during 2017.

Our FFO increased $2.2 million, or $.14 per diluted share, during the first six months of 2018, as compared to the first six months of 2017 due to: (i) an increase of $1.7 million, or $.12 per diluted share, resulting from the lease termination agreement entered into during the second quarter of 2018 in connection with a single tenant MOB located in Texas that terminated a lease that that was scheduled to expire in July, 2020; (ii) a decrease of approximately $400,000, or $.02 per diluted share, resulting from the non-recurring repairs and remediation expenses incurred at one of our medical office buildings; (iii) an increase of approximately $500,000, or $.04 per diluted share, resulting for business interruption insurance recovery proceeds recording during the first six months of 2018 that related to the period of August through December of 2017, and; (iv) other combined net increase of approximately $400,000 due to increased net income generated at various properties, including properties acquired during 2017.

Hurricane Harvey Impact

In late August, 2017, five of our medical office buildings located in the Houston, Texas area, as mentioned below, incurred extensive water damage as a result of Hurricane Harvey. Until various times during the second quarter of 2018, these properties were temporarily closed and non-operational as we continued to reconstruct and restore them to operational condition. As of June 30, 2018, reconstruction on all of the occupied space in these properties has been completed and operations have resumed.

During the first quarter of 2018, pursuant to the terms of a global settlement with our commercial property insurance carrier, we received $5.5 million of additional insurance recovery proceeds bringing the aggregate hurricane-related insurance recoveries to $12.5 million. The aggregate insurance recovery proceeds, which are net of applicable deductibles, covered substantially all of the costs incurred related to the remediation, repair and reconstruction of each of these properties as well business interruption recoveries for the lost income related to each of these properties during the period they were non-operational.  

Our properties damaged and temporarily closed from Hurricane Harvey were:

22

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $23.2 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $20.3 million during the comparable period of 2017. The $2.9 million net increase was attributable to:  

•     a favorable change of $346,000 in rent receivable;

•     an unfavorable change of $194,000 in leasing costs paid, and;

•     other combined net unfavorable change of approximately $300,000.

Net cash used in/provided by investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $3.8 million during the first six months of 2018 as compared to $51.1 million of net cash provided by investing activities during the first six months of 2017.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, we funded: (i) $369,000 in equity investments in an unconsolidated LLC; (ii) $4.2 million in capital additions to real estate investments including tenant improvements at various MOBs; (iii) $4.1 million paid to acquire the Beaumont Medical Sleep Center Building, as discussed above, and; (iv) $192,000 of hurricane related remediation expenses  In addition, during the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, we received: (i) $4.5 million of hurricane insurance proceeds in excess of damaged property write-downs, and; (ii) $501,000 of cash distributions in excess of income received from our unconsolidated LLCs.      

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, we funded: (i) $532,000 million in equity investments in various unconsolidated LLCs; (ii) $6.5 million in capital additions to real estate investments including construction costs for the Henderson Medical Plaza MOB (this MOB opened in April, 2017), as well as tenant improvements at various MOBs; (iii) $7.9 million paid to acquire the minority interest in a majority-owned LLC (Arlington Medical Properties), and; (iv) $150,000 deposit on real estate assets in connection with the July, 2017 acquisition of the Healthcare Center at Hamburg. In addition, during the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, we received: (i) $54.0 million of net cash proceeds received in connection with the divestiture of St. Mary’s Professional Office Building (net of closing costs and $11.3 million of restricted cash held by a 1031 exchange intermediary, as discussed below); (ii) $216,000 of installment repayments of an outstanding member loan that was provided by us to Arlington Medical Properties, LLC, and; (iii) $743,000 of cash distributions in excess of income received from our unconsolidated LLCs.  Additionally, as a result of our January 1, 2018 adoption of ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash, we recognized $11.3 million of restricted cash proceeds during the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 in connection with the divestiture of St. Mary’s Professional Office Building. This restricted cash was held until the third quarter of 2017 at which time the majority of the cash was utilized to fund planned like-kind exchange acquisitions pursuant to Section 1031 of the IRS code.

Net cash used in financing activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $17.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to $60.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, we paid: (i) $22.6 million on mortgage notes payable that are non-recourse to us, including the repayments of $21.7 million related to previously outstanding mortgage notes payable on three properties, which were funded utilizing borrowings under our revolving credit agreement; (ii) $1.5 million of financing costs related to the revolving credit agreement that was amended during the first quarter of 2018, and; (iii) $9.2 million of dividends (excludes the $9.2 million dividend declared on June 13, 2018 that was paid on July 3, 2018). Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2018, we received: (i) $16.2 million of net borrowings on our revolving credit agreement, and; (ii) $60,000 of net cash from the issuance of shares of beneficial interest.

23

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, we paid: (i) $18.7 million of net borrowings on our revolving line of credit; (ii) $36.5 million on mortgage notes payable that are non-recourse to us, including the repayment of an aggregate of $35.0 million related to previously outstanding mortgage notes payable on three properties that were funded utilizing borrowings under our revolving credit facility; (iii) $284,000 of financing costs related to the revolving credit facility and a mortgage note payable that is non-recourse to us, and; (iv) $17.9 million of dividends.  Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, we received (i) $13.2 million of proceeds from a new mortgage note payable that is non-recourse to us (these proceeds were utilized to repay outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility), and; (ii) $122,000 of net cash from the issuance of shares of beneficial interest.

Additional cash flow and dividends paid information for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:

As indicated on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows, we generated net cash provided by operating activities of $23.2 million and $20.3 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As also indicated on our statement of cash flows, non-cash expenses including depreciation and amortization expense, amortization of debt premium, stock-based compensation expense, hurricane insurance recovery proceeds in excess of damaged property write-downs and gain on transaction (as applicable) are the primary differences between our net income and net cash provided by operating activities during each period. In addition, as reflected in the cash flows from investing activities section, we received $501,000 and $734,000 during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of cash distributions in excess of income from various unconsolidated LLCs which represents our share of the net cash flow distributions from these entities. The cash distributions in excess of income represent operating cash flows net of capital expenditures and debt repayments made by the LLCs.

We therefore generated $23.7 million and $21.1 million of net cash during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the operating activities of our properties recorded on a consolidated and an unconsolidated basis. We declared dividends of $18.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 ($9.2 million of which was paid in July, 2018) and declared and paid dividends of $17.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. During the first six months of 2018, the $23.7 million of net cash generated related to the operating activities of our properties was approximately $5.4 million greater than the $18.3 million of dividends declared during the first six months of 2018. During the first six months of 2017, the $21.1 million of net cash generated related to the operating activities of our properties was approximately $3.2 million greater than the $17.9 million of dividends declared and paid during the first six months of 2017.  

As indicated in the cash flows from investing activities and cash flows from financing activities sections of the statements of cash flows, there were various other sources and uses of cash during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.  From time to time, various other sources and uses of cash may include items such as investments and advances made to/from LLCs, additions to real estate investments, acquisitions/divestiture of properties, net borrowings/repayments of debt, and proceeds generated from the issuance of equity. Therefore, in any given period, the funding source for our dividend payments is not wholly dependent on the operating cash flow generated by our properties. Rather, our dividends as well as our capital reinvestments into our existing properties, acquisitions of real property and other investments are funded based upon the aggregate net cash inflows or outflows from all sources and uses of cash from the properties we own either in whole or through LLCs, as outlined above.

In determining and monitoring our dividend level on a quarterly basis, our management and Board of Trustees consider many factors in determining the amount of dividends to be paid each period. These considerations primarily include: (i) the minimum required amount of dividends to be paid in order to maintain our REIT status; (ii) the current and projected operating results of our properties, including those owned in LLCs, and; (iii) our future capital commitments and debt repayments, including those of our LLCs. Based upon the information discussed above, as well as consideration of projections and forecasts of our future operating cash flows, management and the Board of Trustees have determined that our operating cash flows have been sufficient to fund our dividend payments. Future dividend levels will be determined based upon the factors outlined above with consideration given to our projected future results of operations.

We expect to finance all capital expenditures and acquisitions and pay dividends utilizing internally generated and additional funds. Additional funds may be obtained through: (i) borrowings under our existing $300 million revolving credit agreement (which had $102.7 million of available borrowing capacity, net of outstanding borrowings as of June 30, 2018); (ii) borrowings under or refinancing of existing third-party debt pursuant to mortgage loan agreements entered into by our consolidated and unconsolidated LLCs/LPs; (iii) the issuance of equity, and/or; (iv) the issuance of other long-term debt.

We believe that our operating cash flows, cash and cash equivalents, available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit agreement and access to the capital markets provide us with sufficient capital resources to fund our operating, investing and financing requirements for the next twelve months, including providing sufficient capital to allow us to make distributions necessary to enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the event we need to access the capital markets or other sources of financing, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing on acceptable terms or within an acceptable time. Our inability to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us could have a material unfavorable impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

24

Credit facilities and mortgage debt

Management routinely monitors and analyzes the Trust’s capital structure in an effort to maintain the targeted balance among capital resources including the level of borrowings pursuant to our $300 million revolving credit agreement, the level of borrowings pursuant to non-recourse mortgage debt secured by the real property of our properties and our level of equity including consideration of additional equity issuances.  This ongoing analysis considers factors such as the current debt market and interest rate environment, the current/projected occupancy and financial performance of our properties, the current loan-to-value ratio of our properties, the Trust’s current stock price, the capital resources required for anticipated acquisitions and the expected capital to be generated by anticipated divestitures. This analysis, together with consideration of the Trust’s current balance of revolving credit agreement borrowings, non-recourse mortgage borrowings and equity, assists management in deciding which capital resource to utilize when events such as refinancing of specific debt components occur or additional funds are required to finance the Trust’s growth.

On March 27, 2018, we entered into a revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) which, among other things, increased our borrowing capacity by $50 million to $300 million and extended the maturity date from our previously existing facility. The replacement Credit Agreement, which is scheduled to mature in March, 2022, includes a $40 million sublimit for letters of credit and a $30 million sub limit for swingline/short-term loans.  The Credit Agreement also provides for options to extend the maturity date for two additional six month periods. Additionally, the Credit Agreement includes an option to increase the total facility borrowing capacity up to an additional $50 million, subject to lender agreement.  Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Trust. In addition, borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured by first priority security interests in and liens on all equity interests in certain of the Trust’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. Borrowings made pursuant to the Credit Agreement will bear interest, at our option, at one, two, three, or six month LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.10% to 1.35% or at the Base Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.10% to 0.35%. The Credit Agreement defines “Base Rate” as the greater of: (a) the administrative agent’s prime rate; (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 1/2 of 1%, and; (c) one month LIBOR plus 1%.  A facility fee of 0.15% to 0.35% will be charged on the total commitment of the Credit Agreement. The margins over LIBOR, Base Rate and the facility fee are based upon our total leverage ratio.  At June 30, 2018, the applicable margin over the LIBOR rate was 1.15%, the margin over the Base Rate was 0.15%, and the facility fee was 0.20%.  

At June 30, 2018, we had $197.3 million of outstanding borrowings under our Credit Agreement and $102.7 million of available borrowing capacity.  There are no compensating balance requirements.  As disclosed below, during the first six months of 2018, we repaid an aggregate of $21.7 million on three mortgages utilizing borrowings under our Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including limitations on certain indebtedness, liens, acquisitions and other investments, fundamental changes, asset dispositions and dividends and other distributions. The Credit Agreement also contains restrictive covenants regarding the Trust’s ratio of total debt to total assets, the fixed charge coverage ratio, the ratio of total secured debt to total asset value, the ratio of total unsecured debt to total unencumbered asset value, and minimum tangible net worth, as well as customary events of default, the occurrence of which may trigger an acceleration of amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement. We are in compliance with all of the covenants at June 30, 2018. We also believe that we would remain in compliance if the full amount of our commitment was borrowed.

The following table includes a summary of the required compliance ratios, giving effect to the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement (dollar amounts in thousands): 

25

As indicated on the following table, we have eight mortgages, all of which are non-recourse to us, included on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018 (amounts in thousands):

On February 13, 2018, upon its maturity, a $4.1 million floating rate mortgage loan on the Sparks Medical Building/Vista Medical Terrace was fully repaid utilizing borrowings under our Credit Agreement.  

On April 5, 2018, upon its maturity, a $9.7 million floating rate mortgage loan on the Centennial Hills Medical Office Building was fully repaid utilizing borrowings under our Credit Agreement.  

On May 2, 2018, upon its maturity, a $7.9 million fixed rate mortgage loan on the Rosenberg Children’s Medical Plaza was fully repaid utilizing borrowings under our Credit Agreement.  

The mortgages are secured by the real property of the buildings as well as property leases and rents. The eight mortgages outstanding as of June 30, 2018 had a combined fair value of approximately $53.0 million. Changes in market rates on our fixed rate debt impacts the fair value of debt, but it has no impact on interest incurred or cash flow.

At December 31, 2017, we had eleven mortgages, all of which were non-recourse to us, included in our consolidated balance sheet. The combined outstanding balance of these eleven mortgages was $75.7 million and had a combined fair value of approximately $76.3 million.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2018, we do not have any off balance sheet arrangements other than equity and debt financing commitments.   

Acquisition and Divestiture Activity

Please see Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for completed transactions.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Reference is made to Item 7A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. There have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures during the first six months of 2018.

26

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2018, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Trust’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), we performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”).

Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management on a timely basis in order to comply with our disclosure obligations under the 1934 Act and the SEC rules thereunder.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors during the first six months of 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

27

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes a listing of risk factors to be considered by investors in our securities. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a.) Exhibits:

28

EXHIBIT INDEX

29

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

30