WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
_____
to
_____.
Commission file number: 001-9383
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
CALIFORNIA (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
94-2156203 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1108 FIFTH AVENUE, SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA 94901
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code (707) 863-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
Title of Class | Shares outstanding as of October 26, 2009 | |
Common Stock, No Par Value | 29,206,991 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- 2 -
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about Westamerica Bancorporation for
which it claims the protection of the safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to: (i) projections of revenues, expenses, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, the payment
or nonpayment of dividends, capital structure and other financial items; (ii) statements of plans,
objectives and expectations of the Company or its management or board of directors, including those
relating to products or services; (iii) statements of future economic performance; and (iv)
statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as believes, anticipates,
expects, intends, targeted, projected, continue, remain, will, should, may and
other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the
exclusive means of identifying such statements.
These forward-looking statements are based on Managements current knowledge and belief and include
information concerning the Companys possible or assumed future financial condition and results of
operations. A number of factors, some of which are beyond the Companys ability to predict or
control, could cause future results to differ materially from those contemplated. These factors
include but are not limited to (1) the length and severity of current difficulties in the national
and California economies and the effects of federal and state government efforts to address those
difficulties; (2) continued low liquidity levels in capital markets; (3) fluctuations in asset
prices including, but not limited to, stocks, bonds, real estate, and commodities; (4) the effect
of acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses including the recent acquisition of County
Bank assets and assumption of County Bank liabilities from the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation; (5) economic uncertainty created by terrorist threats and attacks on the United
States, the actions taken in response, and the uncertain effect of these events on the national and
regional economies; (6) changes in the interest rate environment; (7) changes in the regulatory
environment; (8) significantly increasing competitive pressure in the banking industry; (9)
operational risks including data processing system failures or fraud; (10) volatility of rate
sensitive loans, deposits and investments; (11) asset/liability management risks and liquidity
risks; and (12) changes in the securities markets. The Company undertakes no obligation to update
any forward-looking statements in this report. The reader is directed to the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, for further discussion of factors which
could affect the Companys business and cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in any forward-looking statement made in this report. The Company undertakes no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements in this report.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
At September 30, | At December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 180,058 | $ | 138,883 | ||||
Money market assets |
463 | 341 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
391,644 | 288,454 | ||||||
Investment securities held to maturity,
with market values of: |
||||||||
$800,893 at September 30, 2009 |
780,846 | |||||||
$950,210 at December 31, 2008 |
949,325 | |||||||
Non-covered loans |
2,267,130 | 2,382,426 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(42,683 | ) | (44,470 | ) | ||||
Non-covered loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
2,224,447 | 2,337,956 | ||||||
Covered loans |
932,656 | | ||||||
Total loans |
3,157,103 | 2,337,956 | ||||||
Non-covered other real estate owned |
4,319 | 3,505 | ||||||
Covered other real estate owned |
18,740 | | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
38,982 | 27,351 | ||||||
Identifiable intangibles |
38,264 | 15,208 | ||||||
Goodwill |
121,699 | 121,699 | ||||||
Interest receivable and other assets |
239,041 | 150,212 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,971,159 | $ | 4,032,934 | ||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest bearing |
$ | 1,377,215 | $ | 1,158,632 | ||||
Interest bearing: |
||||||||
Transaction |
660,001 | 525,153 | ||||||
Savings |
962,823 | 745,496 | ||||||
Time |
1,024,587 | 665,773 | ||||||
Total deposits |
4,024,626 | 3,095,054 | ||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
222,030 | 457,275 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
85,904 | | ||||||
Debt financing and notes payable |
26,531 | 26,631 | ||||||
Liability for interest, taxes and
other expenses |
76,350 | 44,122 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
4,435,441 | 3,623,082 | ||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, authorized - 1,000 shares
Issued and outstanding: |
||||||||
42 at September 30, 2009 |
41,335 | | ||||||
Common stock, authorized - 150,000 shares
Issued and outstanding: |
||||||||
29,207 at September 30, 2009 |
365,547 | |||||||
28,880 at December 31, 2008 |
352,265 | |||||||
Deferred compensation |
2,485 | 2,409 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
6,053 | 1,040 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
120,298 | 54,138 | ||||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
535,718 | 409,852 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
$ | 4,971,159 | $ | 4,032,934 | ||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
Table of Contents
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest Income: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 48,530 | $ | 36,710 | $ | 143,148 | $ | 112,716 | ||||||||
Money market assets and funds sold |
1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
2,352 | 1,858 | 6,775 | 7,281 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
1,920 | 2,183 | 5,775 | 7,503 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities held to maturity |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
3,025 | 4,671 | 11,384 | 14,682 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
5,368 | 5,552 | 16,368 | 16,839 | ||||||||||||
Total Interest Income |
61,196 | 50,975 | 183,453 | 159,024 | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Transaction deposits |
263 | 346 | 761 | 1,145 | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
915 | 1,048 | 2,874 | 3,482 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits |
2,095 | 3,566 | 7,890 | 12,984 | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
509 | 1,954 | 1,572 | 9,360 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
295 | | 714 | | ||||||||||||
Notes payable |
423 | 524 | 1,267 | 1,680 | ||||||||||||
Total Interest Expense |
4,500 | 7,438 | 15,078 | 28,651 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
56,696 | 43,537 | 168,375 | 130,373 | ||||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
2,800 | 600 | 7,200 | 1,800 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income After Provision For Loan Losses |
53,896 | 42,937 | 161,175 | 128,573 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Income: |
||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
9,479 | 7,555 | 27,017 | 22,379 | ||||||||||||
Merchant credit card |
2,163 | 2,611 | 6,818 | 7,903 | ||||||||||||
Debit card |
1,267 | 970 | 3,656 | 2,852 | ||||||||||||
ATM fees and interchange |
965 | 756 | 2,792 | 2,238 | ||||||||||||
Trust fees |
319 | 293 | 1,056 | 973 | ||||||||||||
Financial services commissions |
129 | 186 | 420 | 689 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,639 | 1,336 | 5,712 | 4,689 | ||||||||||||
FAS 141R gain |
| | 48,844 | | ||||||||||||
Securities impairment |
| (41,206 | ) | | (59,384 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of Visa common stock |
| | | 5,698 | ||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income (Loss) |
15,961 | (27,499 | ) | 96,315 | (11,963 | ) | ||||||||||
Noninterest Expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and related benefits |
16,402 | 12,621 | 50,221 | 38,670 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
4,008 | 3,465 | 14,831 | 10,297 | ||||||||||||
Outsourced data processing services |
2,258 | 2,098 | 6,740 | 6,323 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangibles |
1,671 | 788 | 5,051 | 2,433 | ||||||||||||
Furniture and equipment |
1,789 | 903 | 4,618 | 2,825 | ||||||||||||
Courier service |
989 | 835 | 2,881 | 2,488 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees |
913 | 485 | 2,580 | 1,704 | ||||||||||||
FDIC insurance assessments |
1,442 | 131 | 4,820 | 359 | ||||||||||||
Other |
5,679 | 3,877 | 16,198 | 11,835 | ||||||||||||
Visa litigation expense |
| | | (2,338 | ) | |||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
35,151 | 25,203 | 107,940 | 74,596 | ||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
34,706 | (9,765 | ) | 149,550 | 42,014 | |||||||||||
Income Tax Provision (Benefit) |
9,449 | (9,809 | ) | 48,285 | 2,989 | |||||||||||
Net Income |
25,257 | 44 | 101,265 | 39,025 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
1,466 | | 3,151 | | ||||||||||||
Net Income Applicable to Common Equity |
$ | 23,791 | $ | 44 | $ | 98,114 | $ | 39,025 | ||||||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding |
29,210 | 28,908 | 29,072 | 28,895 | ||||||||||||
Diluted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
29,429 | 29,273 | 29,313 | 29,292 | ||||||||||||
Per Common Share Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 3.37 | $ | 1.35 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings |
0.81 | 0.00 | 3.35 | 1.33 | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid |
0.35 | 0.35 | 1.06 | 1.04 |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 5 -
Table of Contents
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited)
Common | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Preferred | Common | Deferred | Comprehensive | Retained | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Stock | Compensation | (Loss) Income | Earnings | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
29,018 | | $ | 334,211 | $ | 2,990 | $ | (4,520 | ) | $ | 61,922 | $ | 394,603 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
39,025 | 39,025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in net unrealized gains on
securities available for sale |
5,044 | 5,044 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post-retirement benefit transition
obligation amortization |
27 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
44,096 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
566 | 22,815 | 22,815 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option tax benefits |
1,130 | 1,130 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity |
11 | 1,261 | (581 | ) | 680 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
893 | 893 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock awarded to employees |
3 | 157 | 157 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of stock |
(703 | ) | (8,339 | ) | (26,779 | ) | (35,118 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
(30,128 | ) | (30,128 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2008 |
28,895 | | $ | 352,128 | $ | 2,409 | $ | 551 | $ | 44,040 | $ | 399,128 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
28,880 | | $ | 352,265 | $ | 2,409 | $ | 1,040 | $ | 54,138 | $ | 409,852 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
101,265 | 101,265 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in net unrealized gains on
securities available for sale |
4,986 | 4,986 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post-retirement benefit transition
obligation amortization |
27 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
106,278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock
and related warrants |
82,519 | 1,207 | 83,726 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred stock |
(41,863 | ) | (41,863 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and
discount accretion |
679 | (3,151 | ) | (2,472 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
350 | 9,094 | 9,094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option tax benefits |
2,179 | 2,179 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity |
7 | 251 | 76 | 327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
847 | 847 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock awarded to employees |
2 | 78 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of stock |
(32 | ) | (374 | ) | (1,116 | ) | (1,490 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
(30,838 | ) | (30,838 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
29,207 | $ | 41,335 | $ | 365,547 | $ | 2,485 | $ | 6,053 | $ | 120,298 | $ | 535,718 | |||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
For the nine months | ||||||||
ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 101,265 | $ | 39,025 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,117 | 7,130 | ||||||
Loan loss provision |
7,200 | 1,800 | ||||||
Net amortization of deferred loan cost (fees) |
358 | (72 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in interest income receivable |
(3,637 | ) | 2,036 | |||||
FAS 141R gain |
(48,844 | ) | | |||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
48,191 | (20,405 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable |
3,811 | (4,089 | ) | |||||
Decrease in interest expense payable |
(317 | ) | (2,469 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
26,398 | (13,373 | ) | |||||
Stock option compensation expense |
847 | 893 | ||||||
Stock option tax benefits |
(2,179 | ) | (1,130 | ) | ||||
Impairment of investment securities |
| 59,384 | ||||||
Gain on sale of Visa common stock |
| (5,698 | ) | |||||
Writedown of property and equipment |
37 | 9 | ||||||
Originations of loans for resale |
(68 | ) | (1,269 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from sale of loans originated for resale |
70 | 1,283 | ||||||
Net gain on sale of property acquired in satisfaction of debt |
(135 | ) | | |||||
Writedown of property acquired in satisfaction of debt |
83 | 195 | ||||||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
134,197 | 63,250 | ||||||
Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Net repayments of loans |
330,616 | 89,415 | ||||||
Proceeds from FDIC loss-sharing indemnification |
43,696 | | ||||||
Purchases of investment securities available for sale |
| (6,430 | ) | |||||
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity |
(522 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from maturity/calls of securities available for sale |
76,185 | 183,616 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale |
| 480 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturity/calls of securities held to maturity |
172,002 | 82,666 | ||||||
Purchases of FRB/FHLB* securities |
| (120 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of FRB/FHLB* stock |
1,502 | 11,364 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of Visa common stock |
| 5,698 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property acquired in satisfaction of debt |
10,009 | 311 | ||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(14,146 | ) | (638 | ) | ||||
Net cash acquired from acquisitions |
44,397 | | ||||||
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities |
663,739 | 366,362 | ||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Net decrease in deposits |
(298,770 | ) | (135,002 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
(476,483 | ) | (310,626 | ) | ||||
Repayments of notes payable and debt financing |
(101 | ) | (10,109 | ) | ||||
Exercise of stock options |
9,094 | 22,815 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
83,726 | | ||||||
Redemption of preferred stock |
(41,863 | ) | | |||||
Stock option tax benefits |
2,179 | 1,130 | ||||||
Repurchases/retirement of stock |
(1,490 | ) | (35,118 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(30,838 | ) | (30,128 | ) | ||||
Preferred dividends |
(2,215 | ) | | |||||
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
(756,761 | ) | (497,038 | ) | ||||
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents |
41,175 | (67,426 | ) | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
138,883 | 209,764 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
$ | 180,058 | $ | 142,338 | ||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures: |
||||||||
Loan collateral transferred to other real estate owned |
$ | 23,804 | $ | 706 | ||||
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net |
4,986 | 5,044 | ||||||
Interest paid for the period |
21,719 | 31,120 | ||||||
Income tax payments for the period |
27,553 | 24,056 | ||||||
Acquisitions: |
||||||||
Assets acquired |
$ | 1,624,464 | | |||||
Liabilities assumed |
1,575,620 | | ||||||
Net |
48,844 | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
* | Federal Reserve Bank/Federal Home Loan Bank (FRB/FHLB) |
- 7 -
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations reflect
interim adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature and which, in the opinion of
Management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented.
The interim results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of the results expected for the full year. These unaudited consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes as well as other information included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Note 2: Accounting Policies.
Certain accounting policies underlying the preparation of these financial statements require
Management to make estimates and judgments. These estimates and judgments may significantly affect
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities.
Management exercises judgment to estimate the appropriate level of the Allowance for Credit Losses,
which is discussed in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
As described in Note 3 below, Westamerica Bank (Bank) acquired assets and assumed liabilities of
the former County Bank on February 6, 2009 from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
The acquired assets and assumed liabilities of County Bank were measured at estimated fair values,
as required by the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations (Financial Accounting
Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) 805, Business Combinations, formerly
FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007)). Management made significant estimates and exercised
significant judgment in accounting for the acquisition of County Bank. Management judgmentally
assigned risk ratings to loans. The assigned risk ratings, appraised collateral values, expected
cash flows, and current interest rates, and statistically derived loss factors were used to measure
fair values for loans. Repossessed loan collateral was primarily valued based upon appraised
collateral values. Due to the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, the Bank recorded a receivable
from the FDIC equal to 80 percent of the loss estimates embedded in the fair values of loans and
repossessed loan collateral. The Bank also recorded an identifiable intangible asset representing
the value of the core deposit customer base of County Bank based on an appraisal performed by an
independent third party. In determining the value of the identifiable intangible asset, the
third-party appraiser used significant estimates including average lives of depository accounts,
future interest rate levels, the cost of servicing various depository products, and other
significant estimates. Management used quoted market prices to determine the fair value of
investment securities, FHLB advances and other borrowings.
Newly Adopted Accounting Policies
Purchased loans. Purchased loans acquired in a business combination, which include loans purchased
in the County Bank acquisition, are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date but the
purchaser cannot carryover the related allowance for loan losses. Purchased loans are accounted for
under FASB ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities with Deteriorated Credit Quality (formerly
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 03-3), when the
loans have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of
acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and interest
payments. Evidence of credit quality deterioration as of the purchase date may include statistics
such as past due and nonaccural status. Generally, acquired loans that meet the Companys
definition for nonaccrual status fall within the scope of FASB ASC 310-30. The difference between
contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at
acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference which is included in the carrying amount
of the loans. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision
for loan losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows result in a reversal of the provision for loan
losses to the extent of prior charges, or a reclassification of the difference from nonaccretable
to accretable with a positive impact on interest income. Further, any excess of cash flows expected
at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is
recognized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan when there is a reasonable
expectation about the amount and timing of such cash flows.
- 8 -
Table of Contents
Covered loans. Loans covered under loss sharing or similar credit protection agreements with the
FDIC are reported in loans exclusive of the expected reimbursement cash flows from the FDIC.
Covered loans are initially recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Subsequent decreases in
the amount expected to be collected results in a provision for loan losses and a corresponding
increase in the estimated FDIC reimbursement, with the estimated net loss impacting earnings.
Interest is accrued daily on the outstanding principal balances. Covered loans which are more than
90 days delinquent with respect to interest or principal, unless they are well secured and in the
process of collection, and other covered loans on which full recovery of principal or interest is
in doubt, are placed on nonaccrual status. Interest previously accrued on covered loans placed on
nonaccrual status is charged against interest income, net of estimated FDIC reimbursements of such
accrued interest. In addition, some covered loans secured by real estate with temporarily impaired
values and covered commercial loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties are placed on
nonaccrual status even though the borrowers continue to repay the loans as scheduled (covered
performing nonaccrual loans). When the ability to fully collect nonaccrual loan principal is in
doubt, payments received are applied against the principal balance of the loans until such time as
full collection of the remaining recorded balance is expected. Any additional interest payments
received after that time are recorded as interest income on a cash basis. Covered performing
nonaccrual loans are reinstated to accrual status when improvements in credit quality eliminate the
doubt as to the full collectibility of both interest and principal.
Covered Other Real Estate Owned. Other real estate owned covered under loss sharing agreements
with the FDIC is reported exclusive of expected reimbursement cash flows from the FDIC. Upon
transferring covered loan collateral to covered other real estate owned status, acquisition date
fair value discounts on the related loan is also transferred to covered other real estate owned.
Fair value adjustments on covered other real estate owned result in a reduction of the covered
other real estate carrying amount and a corresponding increase in the estimated FDIC reimbursement,
with the estimated net loss charged against earnings.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In first quarter 2009, the Company adopted the following new accounting pronouncements:
| FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations (formerly FAS 141R (revised 2007), Business
Combinations); |
| FASB ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly FAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133); and |
| FASB ASC 820-10-55-23B, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures- Overall Implementation
Guidance (formerly, FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
15). |
In the second quarter 2009, the Company adopted the following new accounting pronouncements:
| FASB ASC 320-10-65-1, Investments Debt and Equity Securities Guidance related to
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (formerly FSP FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments); |
| FASB ASC 820-10-65-4, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures- Overall Transition
Guidance related to Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset
or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(formerly FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level
of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly); |
| FASB ASC 825-10-65-1, Financial Instruments Overall Transition Guidance related to
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (formerly FSP FAS 107-1 and APB
Opinion 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments); and |
| FASB ASC 855, Subsequent Events (formerly FAS 165, Subsequent Events). |
FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations, requires an acquirer in a business combination to
recognize the assets acquired (including loan receivables), the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, at their fair values as of that
date, with limited exceptions. The acquirer is not permitted to recognize a separate valuation
allowance as of the acquisition date for loans and other assets acquired in a business combination.
The revised statement requires acquisition-related costs to be expensed separately from the
acquisition. It also requires restructuring costs that the acquirer expected but was not obligated
to incur, to be expensed separately from the business combination. The Company applied these
revised provisions in accounting for the acquisition of County Bank.
FASB ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging, changes the disclosure requirements for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires enhanced disclosures about how and why
an entity uses derivatives, how derivatives and related hedged items are accounted for, and how
derivatives and hedged items affect an entitys financial position, performance and cash flows. The
Company had no derivative instruments designated as hedges as of September 30, 2009.
- 9 -
Table of Contents
FASB ASC 820-10-55-23B, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures- Overall Implementation
Guidance, relates to the requirements that pertain to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities covered by accounting guidance for Fair Value Measurements. The adoption of this
guidance did not have any effect on the Companys financial statements at the date of adoption.
FASB ASC 320-10-65-1, Investments Debt and Equity Securities Guidance related to
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments states that an
other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) write-down of debt securities, where fair value is below
amortized cost, is triggered in circumstances where (1) an entity has the intent to sell a
security, (2) it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or (3) the entity does not expect to recover the
entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is
more likely than not the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI
write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the securitys
amortized cost basis and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is
more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI
write-down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss, which is recognized in
earnings, and the amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive
income. The adoption of these provisions did not have any effect on the Companys financial
statements at the date of adoption.
FASB ASC 820-10-65-4, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures- Overall Transition
Guidance related to Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, addresses
measuring fair value in situations where markets are inactive and transactions are not orderly. In
these circumstances quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value. Even if there has been a
significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability and regardless
of the valuation technique(s) used, the objective of a fair value measurement has not changed.
Under these provisions price quotes for assets or liabilities in inactive markets may require
adjustment due to uncertainty as to whether the underlying transactions are orderly. The adoption
of these provisions did not have any effect on the Companys financial statements at the date of
adoption.
FASB ASC 825-10-65-1, Financial Instruments Overall Transition Guidance related to
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, states that entities must disclose
the fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods as well as in annual financial
statements. The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value as well as any changes in
methods and assumptions that occurred during the reporting period must also be disclosed. The
adoption of these provisions did not have any effect on the Companys financial statements at the
date of adoption.
FASB ASC 855, Subsequent Events, establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. The accounting guidance defines: (1) the period after the
balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
(2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after
the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and (3) the disclosures that an entity should
make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. Management has
reviewed events occurring through October 30, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued
and no subsequent events occurred requiring accrual or disclosure.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Update 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.
This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities.
This Update clarifies:
| In circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability
is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value by using one or more
following: a) the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset; b) the
quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets; c) the
income approach, such as present value technique; and/or d) the market approach, such as a
technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity
would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical
liability. |
| When estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to
include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a
restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. |
| Both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement
date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active
market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair
value measurements. |
- 10 -
Table of Contents
This Update is effective for the Companys December 31, 2009 year-end reporting period. The
Company does not report liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Management does not expect
the adoption of the Update to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements at the
date of adoption.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 166 (FAS 166), Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assetsan amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 and FASB Statement No. 167 (FAS 167),
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R).
FAS 166 was issued to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of
the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of
financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets.
Specifically to address: (1) practices that have developed since the issuance of FASB Statement No.
140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,
that are not consistent with the original intent and key requirements of that Statement and (2)
concerns of financial statement users that many of the financial assets (and related obligations)
that have been derecognized should continue to be reported in the financial statements of
transferors. This Statement must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date.
Additionally, on and after the effective date, the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity
is no longer relevant for accounting purposes.
FAS 167 was issued to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities. Specifically to address: (1) the effects on certain provisions of FASB Interpretation No.
46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as a result of the
elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets, and (2) constituent concerns about the application of certain
key provisions of Interpretation 46(R), including those in which the accounting and disclosures
under the Interpretation do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprises
involvement in a variable interest entity.
Both Statements must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual
reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter with early application
prohibited. Management does not expect the adoption of these Statements to have a material effect
on the Companys financial statement at the date of adoption, January 1, 2010.
Note 3: Federally Assisted Acquisition of County Bank
On February 6, 2009, Westamerica Bancorporations bank subsidiary, Westamerica Bank (Bank),
purchased substantially all the assets and assumed substantially all the liabilities of County Bank
from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver of County Bank. County Bank
operated 39 commercial banking branches primarily within Californias central valley region between
Sacramento and Fresno. The FDIC took County Bank under receivership upon County Banks closure by
the California Department of Financial Institutions at the close of business February 6, 2009.
Westamerica Bank submitted a bid for the acquisition of County Bank with the FDIC on February 3,
2009. The FDIC approved Westamerica Banks bid upon reviewing three competing bids and determining
Westamerica Banks bid would be the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund. Westamerica Banks
bid included the purchase of substantially all County Bank assets at a cost of assuming all County
Bank deposits and certain other liabilities. No cash or other consideration was paid by Westamerica
Bank. Further, Westamerica Bank and the FDIC entered loss sharing agreements regarding future
losses incurred on loans and foreclosed loan collateral existing at February 6, 2009. Under the
terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will absorb 80 percent of losses and share in 80
percent of loss recoveries on the first $269 million of losses, and absorb 95 percent of losses and
share in 95 percent of loss recoveries on losses exceeding $269 million. The term for loss sharing
on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term for loss sharing on non-residential
real estate loans is five years in respect to losses and eight years in respect to loss recoveries.
As a result of the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, the Company recorded a receivable of $129
million at the time of acquisition.
- 11 -
Table of Contents
The County Bank acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in
accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations. The statement of net assets acquired as of
February 6, 2009 and the resulting bargain purchase gain are presented in the following table. The
purchased assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at their respective acquisition date fair
values, and identifiable intangible assets were recorded at fair value. Fair values are preliminary
and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of a merger as information
relative to closing date fair values
becomes available. A bargain purchase gain totaling $48.8 million resulted from the acquisition
and is included as a component of noninterest income on the statement of income. The amount of the
gain is equal to the amount by which the fair value of assets purchased exceeded the fair value of
liabilities assumed. The acquisition resulted in a gain due to County Banks impaired capital
condition at the time of the acquisition. The operations of County Bank provided revenue of $46.0
million and net income of $7.7 million for the period of February 6, 2009 to September 30, 2009,
and is included in the consolidated financial statements. County Banks results of operations prior
to the acquisition are not included in Westamericas statement of income.
Statement of Net Assets Acquired (at fair value)
At | ||||
February 6, 2009 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Assets |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 44,668 | ||
Federal funds sold |
12,760 | |||
Securities |
173,839 | |||
Loans |
1,174,353 | |||
Core deposit intangible |
28,107 | |||
Other real estate owned |
9,332 | |||
Other assets |
181,405 | |||
Total Assets |
$ | 1,624,464 | ||
Liabilities |
||||
Deposits |
1,234,123 | |||
Federal funds purchased and
securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
153,169 | |||
Other borrowed funds |
187,252 | |||
Liabilities for interest and other expenses |
1,076 | |||
Total Liabilities |
1,575,620 | |||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 48,844 | ||
County Bank tangible stockholders
equity |
$ | 58,623 | ||
Adjustments to reflect assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed at fair value: |
||||
Loans and leases, net |
(150,326 | ) | ||
Other real estate owned |
(5,470 | ) | ||
FDIC loss-sharing receivable
(included in other assets) |
128,962 | |||
Core deposit intangible |
28,107 | |||
Deposits |
(10,823 | ) | ||
Securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
(2,061 | ) | ||
Other borrowed funds |
1,832 | |||
FAS 141R Gain |
$ | 48,844 | ||
The pro forma consolidated condensed statements of income for Westamerica Bancorporation and County
Bank for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the year ended December 31, 2008
are presented below. The unaudited pro forma information presented does not necessarily reflect the
results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning
of the applicable periods presented, nor does it indicate the results of operations in future
periods.
The pro forma purchase accounting adjustments related to loans and leases, deposits, securities
sold under repurchase agreements and other borrowed funds are being accreted or amortized into
income using methods that approximate a level yield over their respective estimated lives. Purchase
accounting adjustments related to identifiable intangibles are being amortized and recorded as
noninterest expense over their respective estimated lives using accelerated methods. The pro forma
consolidated condensed statements of income do not reflect any adjustments to Countys historical
provision for credit losses and goodwill impairment charges.
- 12 -
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 | Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands except per share data) | (In thousands except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County | Pro Forma | Pro Forma | County | Proforma | Pro Forma | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Westamerica | Bank | Adjustments | Combined | Westamerica | Bank | Adjustments | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ | 152,357 | $ | 57,284 | $ | (3,603 | ) | $ | 206,038 | $ | 159,024 | $ | 91,110 | $ | (3,603 | ) | $ | 246,531 | ||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
8,191 | 15,483 | (7,626 | ) | 16,048 | 28,651 | 32,249 | (7,626 | ) | 53,274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
144,166 | 41,801 | 4,023 | 189,990 | 130,373 | 58,861 | 4,023 | 193,257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Credit Losses |
7,200 | 11,734 | | 18,934 | 1,800 | 26,827 | | 28,627 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income after Provision for
Credit Losses |
136,966 | 30,067 | 4,023 | 171,056 | 128,573 | 32,034 | 4,023 | 164,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest Income (Loss) |
40,548 | 11,437 | 48,844 | 100,829 | (11,963 | ) | 4,603 | 48,844 | 41,484 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest Expense |
75,875 | 34,267 | 4,956 | 115,098 | 74,596 | 89,896 | 4,956 | 169,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
101,639 | 7,237 | 47,911 | 156,787 | 42,014 | (53,259 | ) | 47,911 | 36,666 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Tax Provision (Benefit) |
36,590 | 3,043 | 20,147 | 59,780 | 2,989 | 7,642 | 20,147 | 30,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 65,049 | $ | 4,194 | $ | 27,764 | $ | 97,007 | $ | 39,025 | $ | (60,901 | ) | $ | 27,764 | $ | 5,888 | |||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Equity |
$ | 61,898 | $ | 4,194 | $ | 27,764 | $ | 93,856 | $ | 39,025 | $ | (60,901 | ) | $ | 27,764 | $ | 5,888 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share |
$ | 2.13 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 3.23 | $ | 1.35 | $ | (2.11 | ) | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share |
2.11 | 0.14 | 0.95 | 3.20 | 1.33 | (2.08 | ) | 0.95 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding |
29,072 | 28,895 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
29,313 | 29,292 |
Year ended December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
County | Pro Forma | Pro Forma | ||||||||||||||
Westamerica | Bank | Adjustments | Combined | |||||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ | 208,469 | $ | 117,175 | $ | (4,477 | ) | $ | 321,167 | |||||||
Interest Expense |
33,243 | 40,462 | (9,717 | ) | 63,988 | |||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
175,226 | 76,713 | 5,240 | 257,179 | ||||||||||||
Provision for Credit Losses |
2,700 | 55,370 | | 58,070 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income after Provision for
Credit Losses |
172,526 | 21,343 | 5,240 | 199,109 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest (Loss) Income |
(2,056 | ) | 5,775 | 48,844 | 52,563 | |||||||||||
Noninterest Expense |
100,761 | 115,774 | 5,989 | 222,524 | ||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
69,709 | (88,656 | ) | 48,095 | 29,148 | |||||||||||
Income Tax Provision |
9,874 | 7,381 | 20,224 | 37,479 | ||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 59,835 | $ | (96,037 | ) | $ | 27,871 | $ | (8,331 | ) | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Equity |
$ | 59,835 | $ | (96,037 | ) | $ | 27,871 | $ | (8,331 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share |
$ | 2.07 | $ | (3.32 | ) | $ | 0.96 | $ | (0.29 | ) | ||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share |
2.04 | (3.28 | ) | 0.95 | (0.28 | ) | ||||||||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding |
28,892 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
29,273 |
Note 4: Investment Securities
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated market value of the available for
sale investment securities portfolio as of September 30, 2009 follows:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Market Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | 3,003 | $ | 20 | $ | | $ | 3,023 | ||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
1,015 | 68 | | 1,083 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
151,077 | 3,783 | (2 | ) | 154,858 | |||||||||||
Obligations of States and political subdivisions |
165,129 | 5,363 | (424 | ) | 170,068 | |||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
46,864 | 802 | (248 | ) | 47,418 | |||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
10,000 | 0 | (2,135 | ) | 7,865 | |||||||||||
FHLMC and FNMA stock |
824 | 1,910 | | 2,734 | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
2,778 | 1,849 | (32 | ) | 4,595 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 380,690 | $ | 13,795 | $ | (2,841 | ) | $ | 391,644 | |||||||
- 13 -
Table of Contents
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated market value of the held to
maturity investment securities portfolio as of September 30, 2009 follows:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Market Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
$ | 25,000 | $ | 89 | $ | | $ | 25,089 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
66,489 | 1,955 | | 68,444 | ||||||||||||
Obligations of States and political subdivisions |
528,147 | 21,409 | (794 | ) | 548,762 | |||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
161,210 | 3,767 | (6,379 | ) | 158,598 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 780,846 | $ | 27,220 | $ | (7,173 | ) | $ | 800,893 | |||||||
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated market value of the available
for sale investment securities portfolio as of December 31, 2008 follows:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Market Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | 3,014 | $ | 68 | $ | | $ | 3,082 | ||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
11,019 | 71 | (13 | ) | 11,077 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
40,302 | 941 | (3 | ) | 41,240 | |||||||||||
Obligations of States and political subdivisions |
156,602 | 5,042 | (598 | ) | 161,046 | |||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
61,565 | 143 | (1,857 | ) | 59,851 | |||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
9,999 | | (3,552 | ) | 6,447 | |||||||||||
FHLMC and FNMA stock |
824 | | (3 | ) | 821 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
2,778 | 2,222 | (110 | ) | 4,890 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 286,103 | $ | 8,487 | $ | (6,136 | ) | $ | 288,454 | |||||||
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated market value of the held to
maturity investment securities portfolio as of December 31, 2008 follows:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Market Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
$ | 110,000 | $ | 1,731 | $ | | $ | 111,731 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
85,676 | 867 | (299 | ) | 86,244 | |||||||||||
Obligations of States and political subdivisions |
545,237 | 12,983 | (2,875 | ) | 555,345 | |||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
208,412 | 1,744 | (13,266 | ) | 196,890 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 949,325 | $ | 17,325 | $ | (16,440 | ) | $ | 950,210 | |||||||
- 14 -
Table of Contents
The amortized cost and estimated market value of securities as of September 30, 2009, by
contractual maturity, are shown in the following table:
Securities Available | Securities Held | |||||||||||||||
for Sale | to Maturity | |||||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Market | Amortized | Market | |||||||||||||
Cost | Value | Cost | Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Maturity in years: |
||||||||||||||||
1 year or less |
$ | 10,873 | $ | 10,963 | $ | 32,386 | $ | 32,556 | ||||||||
1 to 5 years |
73,324 | 75,378 | 48,933 | 50,513 | ||||||||||||
5 to 10 years |
67,415 | 69,940 | 412,917 | 430,034 | ||||||||||||
Over 10 years |
27,535 | 25,758 | 58,912 | 60,748 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
179,147 | 182,039 | 553,148 | 573,851 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed |
197,941 | 202,276 | 227,698 | 227,042 | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
3,602 | 7,329 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 380,690 | $ | 391,644 | $ | 780,846 | $ | 800,893 | ||||||||
Expected maturities of mortgage-backed securities can differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties. In addition, such factors as prepayments and interest rates may affect the yield on the
carrying value of mortgage-backed securities. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company had no high-risk collateralized mortgage obligations as defined by regulatory guidelines.
An analysis of gross unrealized losses of the available for sale investment securities portfolio as
of September 30, 2009, follows:
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 10 | $ | | $ | 233 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 243 | $ | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations of States and political subdivisions |
11,200 | (342 | ) | 4,066 | (82 | ) | 15,266 | (424 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
3,438 | (17 | ) | 12,652 | (231 | ) | 16,090 | (248 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
| | 7,865 | (2,135 | ) | 7,865 | (2,135 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other securities |
| | 1,968 | (32 | ) | 1,968 | (32 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 14,648 | $ | (359 | ) | $ | 26,784 | $ | (2,482 | ) | $ | 41,432 | $ | (2,841 | ) | |||||||||
An analysis of gross unrealized losses of the held to maturity investment securities portfolio
as of September 30, 2009, follows:
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of States and political subdivisions |
$ | 6,621 | $ | (143 | ) | $ | 22,044 | $ | (651 | ) | $ | 28,665 | $ | (794 | ) | |||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
1,746 | (10 | ) | 38,179 | (6,369 | ) | 39,925 | (6,379 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,367 | $ | (153 | ) | $ | 60,223 | $ | (7,020 | ) | $ | 68,590 | $ | (7,173 | ) | |||||||||
The unrealized losses on the Companys investments in collateralized mortgage obligations and
asset backed securities were caused by market conditions for these types of investments. The
Company evaluates these securities on a quarterly basis including changes in security ratings
issued by ratings agencies, delinquency and loss information with respect to the underlying
collateral, changes in the levels of subordination for the Companys particular position within the
repayment structure, and remaining credit enhancement as compared to expected credit losses of the
security. Substantially all of these securities continue to be AAA rated by one or more major
rating agencies. Because the Company does not intend to sell or be required to sell these
securities and we expect to recover the amortized cost basis of the securities, the Company does
not consider those investments to be other-than temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2009.
- 15 -
Table of Contents
The unrealized losses on the Companys investments in obligations of states and political
subdivisions were caused by conditions in the municipal securities markets and certain securities
being insured by one of the monoline insurance companies. The Company evaluates these securities
quarterly to determine if a change in security rating has occurred or the municipality has
experienced any financial difficulties. Substantially all of these securities continue to be
investment grade rated. Because the Company believes that it will collect all principal and
interest due and does not intend to sell or be required to sell the securities, the Company does
not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2009.
The fair values of the investment securities could decline in the future if the general economy
deteriorates and the liquidity for securities is low. As a result, other than temporary impairments
may occur in the future.
An analysis of gross unrealized losses of the available for sale investment securities portfolio as
of December 31, 2008, follows:
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
$ | 9,988 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 9,988 | $ | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
| | 1,680 | (3 | ) | 1,680 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Obligations of States and political subdivisions |
8,817 | (470 | ) | 2,171 | (128 | ) | 10,988 | (598 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
11,527 | (595 | ) | 25,085 | (1,262 | ) | 36,612 | (1,857 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
| | 6,447 | (3,552 | ) | 6,447 | (3,552 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
FHLMC and FNMA stock |
3 | (3 | ) | | | 3 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other securities |
| | 1,890 | (110 | ) | 1,890 | (110 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 30,335 | $ | (1,081 | ) | $ | 37,273 | $ | (5,055 | ) | $ | 67,608 | $ | (6,136 | ) | |||||||||
An analysis of gross unrealized losses of the held to maturity investment securities portfolio
as of December 31, 2008, follows:
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
$ | 22,401 | $ | (286 | ) | $ | 3,886 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 26,287 | $ | (299 | ) | |||||||||
Obligations of States and political subdivisions |
73,205 | (2,846 | ) | 4,713 | (29 | ) | 77,918 | (2,875 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
40,379 | (10,925 | ) | 24,037 | (2,341 | ) | 64,416 | (13,266 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 135,985 | $ | (14,057 | ) | $ | 32,636 | $ | (2,383 | ) | $ | 168,621 | $ | (16,440 | ) | |||||||||
- 16 -
Table of Contents
Note 5: Loans
A summary of the major categories of non-covered and covered loans outstanding is shown in the
following tables:
At September 30, | At December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-covered loans: |
||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 499,819 | $ | 524,786 | ||||
Commercial real estate |
809,717 | 817,423 | ||||||
Construction |
41,124 | 52,664 | ||||||
Residential real estate |
399,564 | 458,447 | ||||||
Consumer installment & other |
516,906 | 529,106 | ||||||
2,267,130 | 2,382,426 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(42,683 | ) | (44,470 | ) | ||||
$ | 2,224,447 | $ | 2,337,956 | |||||
The carrying amount of the covered loans at September 30, 2009, consisted of impaired and non
impaired purchased loans in the following table.
Impaired | Non Impaired | Total Covered | ||||||||||
Purchased Loans | Purchased Loans | Loans | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Covered loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 7,724 | $ | 286,561 | $ | 294,285 | ||||||
Commercial real estate |
20,069 | 450,541 | 470,610 | |||||||||
Construction |
22,778 | 25,982 | 48,760 | |||||||||
Residential real estate |
138 | 19,120 | 19,258 | |||||||||
Consumer installment & other |
187 | 99,556 | 99,743 | |||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 50,896 | $ | 881,760 | $ | 932,656 | ||||||
The following table represents the non impaired purchased loans receivable at the acquisition
date of February 6, 2009. The amounts include principal only and do not reflect accrued interest
as of the date of acquisition or beyond. (In thousands)
Gross contractual loan principal payment receivable |
$ | 1,151,844 | ||
Estimate of contractual principal not expected to be collected |
(57,701 | ) | ||
Fair value of non impaired purchased loans receivable |
$ | 1,108,605 | ||
The Company applied the cost recovery method to impaired purchased loans at the acquisition date of
February 6, 2009 due to the uncertainty as to the timing of expected cash flows as reflected in the
following table. (In thousands)
Contractually required payments receivable (including
interest) |
$ | 210,561 | ||
Nonaccretable difference |
(144,813 | ) | ||
Cash flows expected to be collected |
65,748 | |||
Accretable difference |
| |||
Fair value of loans acquired |
$ | 65,748 | ||
- 17 -
Table of Contents
Changes in the carrying amount of impaired purchased loans were as follows for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009. (In thousands)
Carrying amount at the beginning of the period |
$ | 54,376 | ||
Reductions during the period |
(3,480 | ) | ||
Carrying amount at the end of the period |
$ | 50,896 | ||
Impaired purchased loans had an unpaid principal balance (less prior charge-offs) of $164
million and $82 million at February 6, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively.
There were no loans held for sale at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Note 6: Intangible Assets
The Company has recorded goodwill and other identifiable intangibles associated with purchase
business combinations. Goodwill is not amortized, but is periodically evaluated for impairment. The
Company did not recognize impairment during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Identifiable intangibles are amortized to their estimated residual values over their expected
useful lives. Such lives and residual values are also periodically reassessed to determine if any
amortization period adjustments are indicated. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, no
such adjustments were recorded. The gross carrying amount of identifiable intangible assets and
accumulated amortization was:
At September 30, | At December 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Core Deposit Intangibles |
$ | 52,490 | $ | (17,746 | ) | $ | 24,383 | $ | (13,426 | ) | ||||||
Merchant Draft Processing Intangible |
10,300 | (6,780 | ) | 10,300 | (6,049 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Identifiable Intangible Assets |
$ | 62,790 | $ | (24,526 | ) | $ | 34,683 | $ | (19,475 | ) | ||||||
As of September 30, 2009, the current year and estimated future amortization expense for
identifiable intangible assets was:
Merchant | ||||||||||||
Core | Draft | |||||||||||
Deposit | Processing | |||||||||||
Intangibles | Intangible | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 (actual) |
$ | 4,320 | $ | 731 | $ | 5,051 | ||||||
Estimate for year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2009 |
5,734 | 962 | 6,696 | |||||||||
2010 |
5,534 | 774 | 6,308 | |||||||||
2011 |
4,954 | 624 | 5,578 | |||||||||
2012 |
4,497 | 500 | 4,997 | |||||||||
2013 |
3,957 | 400 | 4,357 | |||||||||
2014 |
3,621 | 324 | 3,945 |
- 18 -
Table of Contents
Note 7: Post Retirement Benefits
The Company offers a continuation of group insurance coverage to qualifying employees electing
early retirement, for the period from the date of retirement until age 65. For eligible employees
the Company pays a portion of these early retirees insurance premiums. The Company reimburses a
portion of Medicare Part B premiums for all qualifying retirees over age 65 and their qualified
spouses. Eligibility for post-retirement medical benefits is based on age and years of service, and
restricted to employees hired prior to February 1, 2006. The Company uses an actuarial-based
accrual method of accounting for post-retirement benefits.
The following table sets forth the net periodic post-retirement benefit costs:
For the nine months ended | ||||||||
At September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Service cost |
$ | (237 | ) | $ | (300 | ) | ||
Interest cost |
165 | 198 | ||||||
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation |
45 | 45 | ||||||
Net periodic cost |
$ | (27 | ) | $ | (57 | ) | ||
The Company does not fund plan assets for any post-retirement benefit plans.
Note 8: Contingent Liabilities
Loan commitments are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any
condition established in the agreement. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon,
the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future funding requirements. Loan
commitments are subject to the Companys normal credit policies and collateral requirements.
Unfunded loan commitments were $507.9 million and $350.8 million at September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively. Standby letters of credit commit the Company to make payments on behalf of
customers when certain specified future events occur. Standby letters of credit are primarily
issued to support customers short-term financing requirements and must meet the Companys normal
credit policies and collateral requirements. Standby letters of credit outstanding totaled $27.6
million and $29.0 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company
also had commitments for commercial and similar letters of credit of $184 thousand and $1.7 million
at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
During 2007, the Visa Inc. (Visa) organization of affiliated entities announced that it completed
restructuring transactions in preparation for an initial public offering planned for early 2008,
and, as part of those transactions, the Banks membership interest in Visa U.S.A. was exchanged for
an equity interest in Visa Inc. In accordance with Visas by-laws, the Bank and other Visa U.S.A.
member banks were obligated to share in Visas litigation obligations which existed at the time of
the restructuring transactions. On November 7, 2007, Visa announced that it had reached a
settlement with American Express related to an antitrust lawsuit. Visa has disclosed other
antitrust lawsuits which existed at the time of the restructuring transactions. In consideration of
the American Express settlement and other antitrust lawsuits filed against Visa, the Company
recorded in the fourth quarter of 2007 a liability and corresponding expense of $2,338 thousand. In
the first quarter 2008, Visa funded a litigation settlement escrow using proceeds from its initial
public offering. Upon the escrow funding, the Company relieved its liability with a corresponding
expense reversal in the amount of $2,338 thousand.
On October 27, 2008, Visa announced that it had reached a settlement with Discover Financial
Services related to an antitrust lawsuit that existed at the time of Visas restructuring requiring
the payment of the settlement to be funded from the litigation settlement escrow. On December 22,
2008, Visa announced that it had funded its litigation settlement escrow in an amount
sufficient to meet such litigation obligation pursuant to Visas amended and restated Certificate
of Incorporation approved by Visas shareholders on December 16, 2008. As such, the Company did not
record a liability for this settlement. On July 16, 2009, Visa announced that it had deposited $700
million into the litigation escrow account previously established under Visas retrospective
responsibility plan. As a result, the Companys conversion rate applicable to the Companys Visa
Class B common stock (stock) has decreased from 0.6296 to 0.5824. The Company had no previously
recorded liabilities related to any outstanding lawsuits requiring reversal, and therefore the
funding of the litigation escrow by decreasing the conversion rate of the Companys stock did not
have any impact on the Companys income statement.
- 19 -
Table of Contents
Due to the nature of its business, the Company is subject to various threatened or filed legal
cases. Based on the advice of legal counsel, the Company does not expect such cases will have a
material, adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Note 9: Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, the Company groups its
assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the
assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair
value. These levels are:
| Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in
active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S.
Treasury and federal agency securities, which are traded by dealers or brokers in active
markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market
transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. |
| Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active,
and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable
in the market. Level 2 includes mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds and
collateralized mortgage obligations as well as other real estate owned and impaired loans
collateralized by real property where the fair value is generally based upon independent
market prices or appraised values of the collateral. |
| Level 3 Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant
assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the
Companys estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash
flow models and similar techniques. Level 3 includes those impaired loans collateralized by
other business assets where the expected cash flow has been used in determining the fair
value. |
Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The table below presents assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
At September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | 3,023 | $ | 3,023 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
1,083 | 1,083 | | | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
154,858 | | 154,858 | | ||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
170,068 | | 170,068 | | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
47,418 | | 47,418 | | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
7,865 | | 7,865 | | ||||||||||||
FHLMC and FNMA stock |
2,734 | 2,734 | | | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
4,595 | 2,626 | 1,969 | | ||||||||||||
Total securities available for sale |
$ | 391,644 | $ | 9,466 | $ | 382,178 | $ | | ||||||||
- 20 -
Table of Contents
Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from
application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. For assets
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still held in the balance sheet at quarter
end, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each
adjustment and the carrying value of the related assets at quarter end.
At September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-covered other real estate owned (1) |
$ | 413 | $ | | $ | 413 | $ | | ||||||||
Non-covered impaired loans (2) |
3,928 | | 3,928 | | ||||||||||||
Total assets measured at fair value on
a nonrecurring basis |
$ | 4,341 | $ | | $ | 4,341 | $ | | ||||||||
(1) | Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate owned that was measured at fair
value subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed assets. |
|
(2) | Represents carrying value of loans for which adjustments are predominantly based on the
appraised value of the collateral and loans considered impaired under FASB ASC 310-10-35,
Subsequent Measurement of Receivables, where a specific reserve has been established. |
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values presented represent the Companys best estimate of fair value using the
methodologies discussed below. The fair values of financial instruments which have a relatively
short period of time between their origination and their expected realization were valued using
historical cost. The values assigned do not necessarily represent amounts which ultimately may be
realized. In addition, these values do not give effect to discounts to fair value which may occur
when financial instruments are sold in larger quantities. Such financial instruments and their
estimated fair values were:
At September 30, 2009 | ||||||||
Book Value | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 180,058 | $ | 180,058 | ||||
Money market assets |
463 | 463 | ||||||
Interest and taxes receivable |
61,173 | 61,173 | ||||||
Noninterest bearing and interest-bearing
transaction and savings deposits |
3,000,039 | 3,000,039 | ||||||
Sweep accounts |
120,496 | 120,496 | ||||||
Interest payable |
1,923 | 1,923 |
The fair values of investment securities were estimated using quoted prices as described above
for Level 1 and Level 2 valuation:
At September 30, 2009 | ||||||||
Book Value | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
$ | 391,644 | $ | 391,644 | ||||
Investment securities held to maturity |
780,846 | 800,893 |
- 21 -
Table of Contents
The fair values of FHLB advances, term repurchase agreements, and notes payable were estimated
by using interpolated yields for financial instruments with similar characteristics. Such financial
instruments and their estimated fair values were:
At September 30, 2009 | ||||||||
Book Value | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
$ | 85,904 | $ | 86,278 | ||||
Term repurchase agreements |
101,533 | 103,892 | ||||||
Senior notes payable |
15,000 | 13,862 | ||||||
Subordinated notes |
11,531 | 10,865 |
Loans were separated into two groups for valuation. Variable rate loans, except for those
described below, which reprice frequently with changes in market rates were valued using historical
cost. Fixed rate loans and variable rate loans that have reached their minimum contractual interest
rates were valued by discounting the future cash flows expected to be received from the loans using
current interest rates charged on loans with similar characteristics. Additionally, the allowance
for loan losses of $42.7 million and the fair market value discount due to credit default risk
associated with the County acquisition of $98.7 million were applied against the estimated fair
values to recognize estimated future defaults of contractual cash flows.
The book values and the estimated fair values of loans were:
At September 30, 2009 | ||||||||
Book Value | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Loans |
$ | 3,157,103 | $ | 3,192,020 |
The fair values of FDIC receivables and time deposits were estimated by discounting estimated
future cash flows related to these financial instruments using current market rates for financial
instruments with similar characteristics. The book values and the estimated fair values were:
At September 30, 2009 | ||||||||
Book Value | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
FDIC receivables |
$ | 85,267 | $ | 84,812 | ||||
Time deposits |
1,024,587 | 1,016,149 |
The majority of the Companys standby letters of credit and other commitments to extend credit
carry current market interest rates if converted to loans. No premium or discount was ascribed to
these commitments because virtually all funding would be at current market rates.
Note 10: Shareholders Equity
On February 13, 2009, the Company issued to the United States Department of the Treasury (the
Treasury) 83,726 shares of Series A Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (the Series
A Preferred Stock), having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The Series A Preferred
Stock pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and thereafter at
a rate of 9% per year. The Company may, at its option, subject to any necessary bank regulatory
approval, redeem the Series A Preferred Stock at par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends. On
September 2, 2009 the Company redeemed 41,863 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock at $1,000 per
share. The Series A Preferred Stock is generally non-voting. Prior to February 13, 2012, unless the
Company has redeemed the Series A Preferred Stock or the Treasury has transferred all of the Series
A Preferred Stock to third parties, the consent of the Treasury will be required for the Company to
declare or pay any dividends or make any distribution on its common stock, other than regular
quarterly cash dividends not exceeding $0.35 or dividends payable only in shares of its common
stock, or repurchase its common stock or
other equity or capital securities, other than in connection with benefit plans consistent with
past practice and certain other circumstances specified in the Securities Purchase Agreement with
the Treasury. The Treasury, as part of the preferred stock issuance, received a warrant to purchase
246,640 shares of the Companys common stock at an initial exercise price of $50.92. The proceeds
from Treasury were allocated based on the relative fair value of the warrant as compared with the
fair value of the preferred stock. The fair value of the warrant was determined using a valuation
model which incorporates assumptions including the Companys common stock price, dividend yield,
stock price volatility, the risk-free interest rate, and other assumptions. The Company allocated
$1.2 million of the proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock to the warrant. The discount on the
preferred stock will be accreted to par value over a five-year term, which is the expected life of
the preferred stock, and reported as a reduction to net income applicable to common equity over
that period. The redemption of the preferred shares on September 2, 2009 triggered the acceleration
of the discount accretion requiring a one-time charge of $538 thousand.
- 22 -
Table of Contents
Note 11: Earnings Per Common Share
The table below shows earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share. Basic
earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income applicable to common equity by the
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share
are computed by dividing net income applicable to common equity by the average number of common
shares outstanding during the period plus the impact of common stock equivalents.
For the three months | For the nine months | |||||||||||||||
ended September 30, | ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding basic |
29,210 | 28,908 | 29,072 | 28,895 | ||||||||||||
Add exercise of options reduced by the
number of shares that could have been
purchased with the proceeds of such
exercise |
219 | 365 | 241 | 397 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding diluted |
29,429 | 29,273 | 29,313 | 29,292 | ||||||||||||
Net income applicable to
common equity |
$ | 23,791 | $ | 44 | $ | 98,114 | $ | 39,025 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 3.37 | $ | 1.35 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
0.81 | 0.00 | 3.35 | 1.33 |
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, options to purchase 726 thousand shares of
common stock were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted net income per share
because the exercise price exceeded the fair value of the stock such that their inclusion would
have had an anti-dilutive effect. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, options and
warrants to purchase 889 thousand and 247 thousand shares of common stock, respectively, were
outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted net income per share because they were
anti-dilutive. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008, options to purchase
582 thousand and 618 thousand shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not
included in the computation of diluted net income per share because they were anti-dilutive.
- 23 -
Table of Contents
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (FTE)* |
$ | 61,593 | $ | 48,693 | $ | 183,270 | $ | 146,407 | ||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
(2,800 | ) | (600 | ) | (7,200 | ) | (1,800 | ) | ||||||||
Noninterest Income: |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of Visa common stock |
| | | 5,698 | ||||||||||||
Net loss from equity securities |
| (41,206 | ) | | (59,384 | ) | ||||||||||
FAS 141R gain |
| | 48,844 | | ||||||||||||
Deposit service charges and other |
15,961 | 13,707 | 47,471 | 41,723 | ||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income (Loss) |
15,961 | (27,499 | ) | 96,315 | (11,963 | ) | ||||||||||
Noninterest Expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Visa litigation |
| | | (2,338 | ) | |||||||||||
Other |
35,151 | 25,203 | 107,940 | 76,934 | ||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
35,151 | 25,203 | 107,940 | 74,596 | ||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes (FTE)* |
39,603 | (4,609 | ) | 164,445 | 58,048 | |||||||||||
Income Tax Provision (Benefit) (FTE)* |
14,346 | (4,653 | ) | 63,180 | 19,023 | |||||||||||
Net Income |
25,257 | 44 | 101,265 | 39,025 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
1,466 | | 3,151 | | ||||||||||||
Net Income Applicable to Common Equity |
$ | 23,791 | $ | 44 | $ | 98,114 | $ | 39,025 | ||||||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding |
29,210 | 28,908 | 29,072 | 28,895 | ||||||||||||
Diluted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
29,429 | 29,273 | 29,313 | 29,292 | ||||||||||||
Common Shares Outstanding at Period End |
29,207 | 28,895 | 29,207 | 28,895 | ||||||||||||
As Reported: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Common Share |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 3.37 | $ | 1.35 | ||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share |
0.81 | 0.00 | 3.35 | 1.33 | ||||||||||||
Return On Assets |
1.86 | % | 0.00 | % | 2.57 | % | 1.22 | % | ||||||||
Return On Common Equity |
19.68 | % | 0.04 | % | 28.38 | % | 12.83 | % | ||||||||
Net Interest Margin (FTE)* |
5.48 | % | 5.19 | % | 5.39 | % | 5.04 | % | ||||||||
Net Loan Losses to Average Non-Covered Loans |
0.56 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.51 | % | 0.23 | % | ||||||||
Efficiency Ratio** |
45.3 | % | 118.9 | % | 38.6 | % | 55.5 | % | ||||||||
Average Balances: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 5,072,866 | $ | 4,137,232 | $ | 5,113,359 | $ | 4,275,657 | ||||||||
Earning Assets |
4,470,851 | 3,745,058 | 4,541,596 | 3,878,972 | ||||||||||||
Total Gross Loans |
3,263,388 | 2,414,317 | 3,261,462 | 2,443,574 | ||||||||||||
Total Deposits |
4,131,388 | 3,154,340 | 4,066,462 | 3,183,393 | ||||||||||||
Shareholders Equity |
549,331 | 412,133 | 527,635 | 406,244 | ||||||||||||
Balances at Period End: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,971,159 | $ | 4,089,482 | ||||||||||||
Earning Assets |
4,372,739 | 3,676,536 | ||||||||||||||
Total Gross Loans |
3,199,786 | 2,408,704 | ||||||||||||||
Total Deposits |
4,024,626 | 3,129,788 | ||||||||||||||
Shareholders Equity |
535,718 | 399,128 | ||||||||||||||
Financial Ratios at Period End: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-Covered Loans |
1.88 | % | 2.08 | % | ||||||||||||
Book Value Per Common Share |
$ | 16.93 | $ | 13.81 | ||||||||||||
Equity to Assets |
10.78 | % | 9.76 | % | ||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk Adjusted Assets |
15.07 | % | 11.25 | % | ||||||||||||
Dividends Paid Per Common Share |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.04 | ||||||||
Common Dividend Payout Ratio |
43 | % | n/m | 32 | % | 78 | % |
The above financial summary has been derived from the Companys unaudited consolidated
financial statements. This information should be read in conjunction with those statements,
notes and the other information included elsewhere herein. Percentages under the heading As
Reported are annualized with the exception of the efficiency ratio. |
||
* | Yields on securities and certain loans have been adjusted upward to a fully taxable
equivalent (FTE) basis in order to reflect the effect of income which is exempt from
federal income taxation at the current statutory tax rate. |
|
** | The efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net
interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and noninterest income). |
- 24 -
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Westamerica Bancorporation and subsidiaries (the Company) reported third quarter 2009 net income
applicable to common equity of $23.8 million or $0.81 diluted earnings per common share compared
with net income applicable to common equity of $44 thousand or $-0.00- diluted earnings per common
share for the same period of 2008. In the third quarter 2009, the Company completed systems
conversions and branch consolidations related to the purchase of assets and assumption of
liabilities of the former County Bank (County), which resulted in reduced expense levels. During
the third quarter 2009, the Company redeemed $42 million in preferred stock requiring accelerated
discount accretion of $538 thousand, which reduced diluted earnings per common share EPS $0.02.
Also, during the same quarter, the Company eliminated $587 thousand in tax reserves due to a lapse
in the statute of limitations, which reduced tax provisions and increased EPS $0.02.
In the third quarter of 2008, the Company recognized a $24 million after-tax or $0.81 diluted
earnings per common share charge for securities losses and other than temporary impairment of
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
preferred stock held in its available for sale investment portfolio. Additionally, the Company
reduced its tax provision by approximately $1 million primarily due to filing its 2007 federal tax
return and adjusting 2007 tax estimates to actual amounts included in the filed tax return. The tax
provision reduction represented $0.03 diluted earnings per common share. The adjustment primarily
resulted from higher than anticipated tax credits earned on limited partnership investments
providing low-income housing and housing for the elderly in Northern and Central California
communities.
The Company reported net income applicable to common equity of $98.1 million or $3.35 diluted
earnings per common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with $39.0 million
or $1.33 diluted earnings per common share for the same period of 2008. The first nine months of
2009 included a $48.8 million FAS 141R gain resulting from the acquisition of County Bank
(County) which increased net income by $28.3 million and earnings per diluted common share by
$0.97. The first nine months of 2008 included $34 million in after-tax losses on sale and
impairment in the value of FHLMC and FNMA preferred stock, $4.7 million in after-tax benefits from
Visas initial public offering and $2.3 million in reduced expenses as known litigation
contingencies were satisfied as a part of the VISA IPO, which combined to reduce net income by $27
million and earnings per diluted common share by $0.92. Results for this period also included the
approximate $1.0 million reduction in the Companys tax provision primarily due to filing its 2007
federal tax return, which increased diluted earnings per common share by $0.03.
Acquisition
On February 6, 2009, Westamerica Bank (Bank) acquired the banking operations of County from the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Bank acquired approximately $1.62 billion of
assets and assumed $1.58 billion of liabilities. The Bank and the FDIC entered loss sharing
agreements regarding future losses incurred on loans and foreclosed loan collateral existing at
February 6, 2009. Under the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will absorb 80 percent
of losses and share in 80 percent of loss recoveries on the first $269 million of losses, and
absorb 95 percent of losses and share in 95 percent of loss recoveries on losses exceeding $269
million. The term for loss sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term
for loss sharing on non-residential real estate loans is five years in respect to losses and eight
years in respect to loss recoveries. The County Bank acquisition was accounted for under the
acquisition method of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations. The
Company recorded a bargain purchase gain totaling $48.8 million resulting from the acquisition,
which is a component of noninterest income on the statement of income. The amount of the gain is
equal to the amount by which the fair value of assets purchased exceeded the fair value of
liabilities assumed. See Note 3 of the Notes to unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information regarding the acquisition.
- 25 -
Table of Contents
Net Income
Following is a summary of the components of net income for the periods indicated:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (FTE) |
$ | 61,593 | $ | 48,693 | $ | 183,270 | $ | 146,407 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
(2,800 | ) | (600 | ) | (7,200 | ) | (1,800 | ) | ||||||||
Noninterest income (loss) |
15,961 | (27,499 | ) | 96,315 | (11,963 | ) | ||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
(35,151 | ) | (25,203 | ) | (107,940 | ) | (74,596 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit (FTE) |
(14,346 | ) | 4,653 | (63,180 | ) | (19,023 | ) | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 25,257 | $ | 44 | $ | 101,265 | $ | 39,025 | ||||||||
Net income applicable to common equity |
$ | 23,791 | $ | 44 | $ | 98,114 | $ | 39,025 | ||||||||
Average diluted common shares |
29,429 | 29,273 | 29,313 | 29,292 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 3.35 | $ | 1.33 | ||||||||
Average total assets |
$ | 5,072,866 | $ | 4,137,232 | $ | 5,113,359 | $ | 4,275,657 | ||||||||
Net income applicable to common equity
to average total assets (annualized) |
1.86 | % | 0.00 | % | 2.57 | % | 1.22 | % | ||||||||
Net income applicable to common equity to
average common stockholders equity (annualized) |
19.68 | % | 0.04 | % | 28.38 | % | 12.83 | % |
County was acquired from the FDIC on February 6, 2009. Net income applicable to common equity
for the third quarter of 2009 was $23.7 million more than the same quarter of 2008, largely
attributable to a $24 million after-tax FHLMC and FNMA preferred stock loss on sale and impairment
charge in the third quarter of 2008, higher net interest income (FTE) and higher service fee income
on deposit accounts, partially offset by higher provision for loan losses, higher noninterest
expense and an increase in income tax provision (FTE). A $12.9 million or 26.5% increase in net
interest income (FTE) was mostly attributed to growth in average balances of loans due to the
acquisition, lower rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities and lower average balances of
borrowings, partially offset by lower yields on earning assets and higher average balances of
interest-bearing deposits and lower average balances of investments. The provision for loan losses
increased $2.2 million, reflecting Managements evaluation of losses inherent in the loan portfolio
not covered by loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC. Noninterest income rose by $43.5 million
mainly due to higher service charges on deposit accounts and because the third quarter of 2008
included securities losses and impairment charge of $41.2 million. Noninterest expense increased
$9.9 million mostly due to acquisition-related increases in salaries and related benefits,
occupancy and equipment expenses and higher FDIC insurance assessments and amortization of
intangibles. The provision for income taxes (FTE) increased $19.0 million primarily due to higher
profitability and because the third quarter of 2008 included the $17.3 million tax benefit on the
investment security losses on sale and impairment charge.
Comparing the first nine months of 2009 to the first nine months of 2008, net income applicable to
common equity increased $59.1 million, due to the FAS 141R gain, higher net interest income (FTE),
higher service charges on deposit accounts and the 2008 securities losses and impairment charges,
partially offset by increases in the provision for loan losses, noninterest expense and income tax
provision (FTE) and the 2008 gain on sale of Visa common stock and reversal of noninterest expense
related to Visa litigation contingencies. The higher net interest income (FTE) was mainly caused by
higher average loans, lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and lower average balances of
borrowings, partially offset by lower yields on loans, lower average investments and higher average
balances of interest-bearing deposits. The provision for loan losses increased $5.4 million to
reflect Managements assessment of losses inherent in the loan portfolio not covered by
loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC. Noninterest income increased $108.3 million largely due to
the FAS 141R gain, higher service charges on deposit accounts due to assumed deposits and the
securities losses in the first nine months of 2008, partially offset by the gain on Visa common
stock in the first quarter of 2008. The income tax provision (FTE) increased $44.2 million
primarily due to the FAS 141R gain, and higher profitability and securities losses in the first
nine months of 2008, partially offset by an increase related to the gain on sale of Visa common
stock in the first nine months of 2008.
- 26 -
Table of Contents
Net Interest Income
Following is a summary of the components of net interest income for the periods indicated:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest and fee income |
$ | 61,196 | $ | 50,975 | $ | 183,453 | $ | 159,024 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(4,500 | ) | (7,438 | ) | (15,078 | ) | (28,651 | ) | ||||||||
FTE adjustment |
4,897 | 5,156 | 14,895 | 16,034 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income (FTE) |
$ | 61,593 | $ | 48,693 | $ | 183,270 | $ | 146,407 | ||||||||
Average earning assets |
$ | 4,470,851 | $ | 3,745,058 | $ | 4,541,596 | $ | 3,878,972 | ||||||||
Net interest margin (FTE)
(annualized) |
5.48 | % | 5.19 | % | 5.39 | % | 5.04 | % |
At September 30, 2009, FDIC covered loans represented 29 percent of the Companys loan portfolio.
Under the terms of the FDIC loss-sharing agreements, the FDIC is obligated to reimburse the Bank 80
percent of loan interest income foregone on covered loans. Such reimbursements are limited to the
lesser of 90 days contractual interest or actual unpaid contractual interest at the time a
principal loss is recognized in respect to the underlying loan. The Bank includes estimated FDIC
reimbursable loan interest income in income in the period such loan interest would be recognized if
the borrower were in compliance with the contractual terms of the loan.
Net interest income (FTE) increased during the third quarter of 2009 by $12.9 million or 26.5% from
the same period in 2008 to $61.6 million, mainly due to higher average balances of loans (up $849.1
million), lower rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities (down 61 basis points (bp)) and lower
average balances of borrowings (down $171.5 million), partially offset by lower yields on loans
(down 21 bp) and higher average balances of interest-bearing deposits (up $778.9 million), and
lower average balances of investments (down $123.3 million).
Comparing the first nine months of 2009 with the corresponding period of 2008, net interest income
(FTE) increased $36.9 million or 25.2%, primarily due to a higher volume of average loans (up
$817.9 million), lower rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities (down 83 bp) and lower average
balances of borrowings (down $167.8 million), partially offset by lower yields on loans (down 35
bp), higher average balances of interest-bearing deposits (up $739.0 million) and lower average
balances of investments (down $155.3 million).
Interest and Fee Income
Interest and fee income (FTE) for the third quarter of 2009 increased $10.0 million or 17.7% from
the same period in 2008. The increase was caused primarily by higher average balances of loans (up
$849.1 million), partially offset by lower yields on loans (down 21 bp) and lower average balances
of investments (down $123.3 million).
The growth in the average earning assets in the third quarter of 2009 compared with the same period
in 2008 was substantially attributable to the acquisition of County loans from the FDIC. The
average balance of such loans for the third quarter of 2009 was $974.1 million. The growth in
average balances of loans were mainly due to increases in the average balance of commercial real
estate loans (up $483.5 million), taxable commercial loans (up $319.9 million), and other consumer
loans (up $119.6 million), partially offset by a $21.5 million decline in average tax-exempt
commercial loans, a $37.8 million decline in average residential real estate loans and a $20.3
million decline in indirect automobile loans. The acquired County loan portfolio did not contain
significant volumes of tax-exempt commercial loans or residential real estate
loans. The average investment portfolio decreased $123.3 million largely due to declines in average
balances of U.S. government sponsored entity obligations (down $94.7 million), municipal securities
(down $15.8 million) and a $42.9 million decline in average balances of FHLMC and FNMA stock
resulting from impairment charges in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2008, partially
offset by a $21.7 million increase in the average balance of mortgage backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations which were purchased from the FDIC as a part of the County
acquisition. The Bank has not been actively purchasing investment securities in the current
environment. The resulting liquidity has been applied to reduce high-cost and interest-sensitive
funding sources.
- 27 -
Table of Contents
The average yield on the Companys earning assets decreased from 5.98% in the third quarter 2008 to
5.88% in the corresponding period of 2009. The composite yield on loans fell 21 bp to 6.03% due to
decreases in yields on taxable commercial loans (down 104 bp), commercial real estate loans (down
33 bp), real estate construction loans (down 261 bp) and residential real estate loans (down 13
bp), partially offset by a 16 bp increase in yields on consumer loans. The investment portfolio
yield decreased 2 bp to 5.47%, mainly due to a 363 bp decrease in the average yield on corporate
and other securities which was affected primarily by suspended dividends on FHLMC and FNMA
preferred stock.
Comparing the first nine months of 2009 with the comparable period of 2008, interest and fee income
(FTE) was up $23.3 million or 13.3%. The increase largely resulted from a higher volume of average
loans due to the County acquisition, partially offset by lower yields on loans and lower average
balances of investments.
Average earning assets increased $662.6 million or 17.1% for the first nine months of 2009 compared
with the same period of 2008 due to the County acquisition. A $817.9 million increase in the
average balance of the loan portfolio was attributable to increases in average balances of
commercial real estate loans (up $447.8 million), taxable commercial loans (up $328.1 million) and
consumer loans (up $96.5 million), partially offset by a $29.0 million decrease in the average
balance of residential real estate loans and a $22.7 million decrease in the average balance of
tax-exempt commercial loans. The acquired County loan portfolio did not contain significant volumes
of tax-exempt commercial loans or residential real estate loans. Average investments decreased by
$155.3 million due to declines in the average balances of U.S. government sponsored entity
obligations (down $112.6 million), municipal securities (down $17.5 million) and a $55.3 million
decline in average balances of FHLMC and FNMA stock resulting from the impairment charge in the
second, third and fourth quarters of 2008, partially offset by a $22.4 million increase in the
average balance of mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The Bank has
not been actively purchasing investment securities in the current environment. The resulting
liquidity has been applied to reduce high-cost and interest-sensitive funding sources.
The average yield on earning assets for the first nine months of 2009 was 5.83% compared with 6.02%
in the corresponding period of 2008. The loan portfolio yield for the first nine months of 2009
compared with the previous quarter was lower by 35 bp, due to decreases in yields on taxable
commercial loans (down 155 bp), commercial real estate loans (down 49 bp) and real estate
construction loans (down 295 bp), partially offset by consumer loans (up 15 bp) and tax-exempt
commercial loans (up 10 bp). The investment portfolio yield decreased by 5 bp. The decrease
resulted from an 11 bp decline in yields on mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations and a 494 bp decline in yields on corporate and other securities which was affected
primarily by suspended dividends on FHLMC and FNMA preferred stock, partially offset by higher
yields on U.S. government sponsored entity obligations (up 28 bp).
Interest Expense
Interest expense in the third quarter of 2009 decreased $2.9 million compared with the same period
in 2008. The decrease was attributable to lower rates paid on the interest-bearing liabilities,
lower balances of borrowings and higher levels of shareholders equity, partially offset by higher
average interest-bearing deposits. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased
from 1.19% in the third quarter of 2008 to 0.58% in the same quarter of 2009. Rates paid on most
interest-bearing liabilities moved with general market conditions. Rates on interest-bearing
deposits decreased 53 bp to 0.47% primarily due to decreases in rates paid on CDs over $100
thousand (down 108 bp) , CDs less than $100 thousand (down 180 bp) and preferred money market
savings (down 87 bp). Rates on short-term borrowings also decreased 59 bp mostly due to lower rates
on federal funds purchased (down 180 bp) and sweep accounts (down 35 bp). Average interest-bearing
liabilities rose by $607.4 million or 24.4% for the third quarter of 2009 over the same period of
2008 primarily through acquisition. Interest-bearing deposits grew $778.9 million primarily due to
increases in CDs less than $100 thousand (up $298.4 million), CDs over $100 thousand (up $97.3
million), money market checking accounts (up $169.1 million), money market savings (up $148.9
million) and regular savings (up $81.5 million). Offsetting the increase were decreases in average
balances of short-term borrowings (down $162.8 million) and long-term debt (down $8.6 million).
Average short-term borrowings decreased due to a $341.5 million decline in the average balance of
federal funds purchased, partially offset by FHLB advances assumed through the County acquisition
averaging $86.2 million and a $95.2 million increase in average balances of repurchase agreements
due to the County acquisition.
- 28 -
Table of Contents
Comparing the first nine months of 2009 with the same period of 2008, interest expense decreased
$13.6 million, due to lower rates paid, lower average balances of borrowing and higher levels of
shareholders equity, offset in part by higher average balances of interest-bearing deposits.
Average interest-bearing liabilities during the first nine months of 2009 rose by $571.2 million or
21.8% over the same period of 2008 mainly through the County acquisition. A $739.0 million growth
in interest-bearing deposits was mostly attributable to increases in average balances of CDs less
than $100 thousand (up $271.9 million), CDs over $100 thousand (up $129.4 million), money market
checking accounts (up $161.4 million), money market savings (up $116.6 million) and regular savings
(up $72.0 million). Short-term borrowings decreased $158.2 million, mainly the net result of lower
average balances of federal funds purchased (down $296.4 million) and sweep accounts (down $15.8
million), partially offset by higher average balances of repurchase agreements (up $76.7 million)
and FHLB advances (up $77.3 million). Average balances of long-term debt also declined $9.6
million. Rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities averaged 0.63% during the first nine months of
2009 compared with 1.46% for the first nine months of 2008. The average rate paid on
interest-bearing deposits declined 62 bp to 0.56% in the first nine months of 2009 mainly due to
lower rates on CDs less than $100 thousand (down 212 bp), CDs over $100 thousand (down 125 bp) and
preferred money market savings (down 109 bp). Rates on short-term borrowings were also lower by 139
bp largely due to federal funds (down 236 bp) and repurchase agreements (down 118 bp).
Net Interest Margin (FTE)
The following summarizes the components of the Companys net interest margin for the periods
indicated:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Yield on earning assets (FTE) |
5.88 | % | 5.98 | % | 5.83 | % | 6.02 | % | ||||||||
Rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities |
0.58 | % | 1.19 | % | 0.63 | % | 1.46 | % | ||||||||
Net interest spread (FTE) |
5.30 | % | 4.79 | % | 5.20 | % | 4.56 | % | ||||||||
Impact of all other net
noninterest bearing funds |
0.18 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.48 | % | ||||||||
Net interest margin (FTE) |
5.48 | % | 5.19 | % | 5.39 | % | 5.04 | % | ||||||||
During the third quarter of 2009, the net interest margin (FTE) increased 29 bp compared with the
same period in 2008. Rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities declined faster than yields on
earning assets (FTE), resulting in a 51 bp increase in net interest spread. The margin contribution
of noninterest bearing funds decreased 22 bp because of the lower market rates of interest at which
they could be invested. The net interest margin (FTE) in the first nine months of 2009 rose by 35
bp compared with the comparable period of 2008. Earning asset yields decreased 19 bp while the cost
of interest-bearing liabilities declined 83 bp, resulting in a 64 bp increase in the net interest
spread. The margin contribution from noninterest bearing funding sources decreased 29 bp.
- 29 -
Table of Contents
Summary of Average Balances, Yields/Rates and Interest Differential
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, information regarding the Companys
consolidated average assets, liabilities and shareholders equity, the amount of interest income
from average earning assets and the resulting yields, and the amount of interest expense paid on
interest-bearing liabilities. Average loan balances include nonperforming loans. Interest income
includes proceeds from loans on nonaccrual status only to the extent cash payments have been
received and applied as interest income. Yields on securities and certain loans have been adjusted
upward to reflect the effect of income which is exempt from federal income taxation at the current
statutory tax rate (FTE).
For the three months ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest | Rates | |||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Earned/ | ||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Paid | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Money market assets and funds sold |
$ | 602 | $ | 1 | 0.66 | % | ||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||
Available for sale |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
237,965 | 2,352 | 3.95 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
167,339 | 2,846 | 6.80 | % | ||||||||
Held to maturity |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
275,553 | 3,025 | 4.39 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
526,004 | 8,290 | 6.30 | % | ||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
642,366 | 9,391 | 5.80 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
184,054 | 3,032 | 6.54 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
1,313,545 | 21,967 | 6.63 | % | ||||||||
Real estate construction |
74,707 | 667 | 3.54 | % | ||||||||
Real estate residential |
424,189 | 5,004 | 4.72 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
624,527 | 9,518 | 6.05 | % | ||||||||
Total loans (1) |
3,263,388 | 49,579 | 6.03 | % | ||||||||
Total earning assets (1) |
4,470,851 | $ | 66,093 | 5.88 | % | |||||||
Other assets |
602,015 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 5,072,866 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand |
$ | 1,371,124 | $ | | | |||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction |
1,687,028 | 1,178 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||
Time less than $100,000 |
491,555 | 829 | 0.67 | % | ||||||||
Time $100,000 or more |
581,681 | 1,266 | 0.86 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
2,760,264 | 3,273 | 0.47 | % | ||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
307,266 | 804 | 1.04 | % | ||||||||
Debt financing and notes payable |
26,551 | 423 | 6.36 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
3,094,081 | $ | 4,500 | 0.58 | % | |||||||
Other liabilities |
58,330 | |||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
549,331 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 5,072,866 | ||||||||||
Net interest spread (1) (2) |
5.30 | % | ||||||||||
Net interest income and interest margin (1) (3) |
$ | 61,593 | 5.48 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Interest and rates calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current
statutory federal tax rate. |
|
(2) | Net interest spread represents the average yield earned on earning assets minus the
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) | Net interest margin is computed by calculating the difference between interest
income and expense (annualized), divided by the average balance of earning assets. |
- 30 -
Table of Contents
For the three months ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Interest | Rates | |||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Earned/ | ||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Paid | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Money market assets and funds sold |
$ | 840 | $ | 1 | 0.47 | % | ||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||
Available for sale |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
164,644 | 1,858 | 4.51 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
194,576 | 3,212 | 6.60 | % | ||||||||
Held to maturity |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
423,088 | 4,671 | 4.42 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
547,593 | 8,536 | 6.24 | % | ||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
322,455 | 5,547 | 6.84 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
205,505 | 3,347 | 6.48 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
830,001 | 14,516 | 6.96 | % | ||||||||
Real estate construction |
69,216 | 1,070 | 6.15 | % | ||||||||
Real estate residential |
462,004 | 5,604 | 4.85 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
525,136 | 7,769 | 5.89 | % | ||||||||
Total loans (1) |
2,414,317 | 37,853 | 6.24 | % | ||||||||
Total earning assets (1) |
3,745,058 | $ | 56,131 | 5.98 | % | |||||||
Other assets |
392,174 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,137,232 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand |
$ | 1,172,953 | $ | | | |||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction |
1,303,821 | 1,394 | 0.43 | % | ||||||||
Time less than $100,000 |
193,170 | 1,201 | 2.47 | % | ||||||||
Time $100,000 or more |
484,396 | 2,365 | 1.94 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,981,387 | 4,960 | 1.00 | % | ||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
470,109 | 1,954 | 1.63 | % | ||||||||
Debt financing and notes payable |
35,163 | 524 | 5.96 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
2,486,659 | $ | 7,438 | 1.19 | % | |||||||
Other liabilities |
65,487 | |||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
412,133 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 4,137,232 | ||||||||||
Net interest spread (1) (2) |
4.79 | % | ||||||||||
Net interest income and interest margin (1) (3) |
$ | 48,693 | 5.19 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Interest and rates calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current
statutory federal tax rate. |
|
(2) | Net interest spread represents the average yield earned on earning assets minus the
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) | Net interest margin is computed by calculating the difference between interest
income and expense (annualized), divided by the average balance of earning assets. |
- 31 -
Table of Contents
For the nine months ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest | Rates | |||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Earned/ | ||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Paid | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Money market assets and funds sold |
$ | 942 | $ | 3 | 0.43 | % | ||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||
Available for sale |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
242,125 | 6,775 | 3.73 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
170,519 | 8,591 | 6.72 | % | ||||||||
Held to maturity |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
332,416 | 11,384 | 4.57 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
534,132 | 25,219 | 6.30 | % | ||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
644,107 | 27,565 | 5.72 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
188,479 | 9,351 | 6.63 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
1,289,190 | 63,354 | 6.57 | % | ||||||||
Real estate construction |
77,677 | 2,286 | 3.93 | % | ||||||||
Real estate residential |
440,975 | 15,802 | 4.78 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
621,034 | 28,018 | 6.03 | % | ||||||||
Total loans (1) |
3,261,462 | 146,376 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||
Total earning assets (1) |
4,541,596 | $ | 198,348 | 5.83 | % | |||||||
Other assets |
571,763 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 5,113,359 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand |
$ | 1,330,495 | $ | | | |||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction |
1,647,624 | 3,635 | 0.29 | % | ||||||||
Time less than $100,000 |
466,175 | 2,550 | 0.73 | % | ||||||||
Time $100,000 or more |
622,168 | 5,340 | 1.15 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
2,735,967 | 11,525 | 0.56 | % | ||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
424,362 | 2,286 | 0.72 | % | ||||||||
Debt financing and notes payable |
26,584 | 1,267 | 6.35 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
3,186,913 | $ | 15,078 | 0.63 | % | |||||||
Other liabilities |
68,316 | |||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
527,635 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 5,113,359 | ||||||||||
Net interest spread (1) (2) |
5.20 | % | ||||||||||
Net interest income and interest margin (1) (3) |
$ | 183,270 | 5.39 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Interest and rates calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current
statutory federal tax rate. |
|
(2) | Net interest spread represents the average yield earned on earning assets minus the
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) | Net interest margin is computed by calculating the difference between interest
income and expense (annualized), divided by the average balance of earning assets. |
- 32 -
Table of Contents
For the nine months ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Interest | Rates | |||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Earned/ | ||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Paid | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Money market assets and funds sold |
$ | 948 | $ | 3 | 0.42 | % | ||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||
Available for sale |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
227,227 | 7,281 | 4.27 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
209,365 | 11,067 | 7.05 | % | ||||||||
Held to maturity |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
444,314 | 14,682 | 4.41 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
553,544 | 25,806 | 6.22 | % | ||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
316,018 | 17,194 | 7.27 | % | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
211,221 | 10,319 | 6.53 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
841,391 | 44,442 | 7.06 | % | ||||||||
Real estate construction |
80,473 | 4,143 | 6.88 | % | ||||||||
Real estate residential |
469,952 | 17,021 | 4.83 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
524,519 | 23,100 | 5.88 | % | ||||||||
Total loans (1) |
2,443,574 | 116,219 | 6.35 | % | ||||||||
Total earning assets (1) |
3,878,972 | $ | 175,058 | 6.02 | % | |||||||
Other assets |
396,685 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,275,657 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand |
$ | 1,186,443 | $ | | | |||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction |
1,309,921 | 4,627 | 0.47 | % | ||||||||
Time less than $100,000 |
194,305 | 4,144 | 2.85 | % | ||||||||
Time $100,000 or more |
492,724 | 8,840 | 2.40 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,996,950 | 17,611 | 1.18 | % | ||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
582,564 | 9,360 | 2.11 | % | ||||||||
Debt financing and notes payable |
36,210 | 1,680 | 6.19 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
2,615,724 | $ | 28,651 | 1.46 | % | |||||||
Other liabilities |
67,246 | |||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
406,244 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 4,275,657 | ||||||||||
Net interest spread (1) (2) |
4.56 | % | ||||||||||
Net interest income and interest margin (1) (3) |
$ | 146,407 | 5.04 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Interest and rates calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current
statutory federal tax rate. |
|
(2) | Net interest spread represents the average yield earned on earning assets minus the
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) | Net interest margin is computed by calculating the difference between interest
income and expense (annualized), divided by the average balance of earning assets. |
- 33 -
Table of Contents
Summary of Changes in Interest Income and Expense due to Changes in Average Asset & Liability
Balances and Yields Earned & Rates Paid
The following tables set forth a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense due
to changes in average asset and liability balances (volume) and changes in average interest rates
for the periods indicated. Changes not solely attributable to volume or rates have been allocated
in proportion to the respective volume and rate components.
Three months ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
compared with | ||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Interest and fee income: |
||||||||||||
Money market assets and funds sold |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||
Available for sale |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
750 | (256 | ) | 494 | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
(462 | ) | 96 | (366 | ) | |||||||
Held to maturity |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
(1,620 | ) | (26 | ) | (1,646 | ) | ||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
(340 | ) | 94 | (246 | ) | |||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
4,800 | (956 | ) | 3,844 | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
(345 | ) | 30 | (315 | ) | |||||||
Commercial real estate |
8,151 | (700 | ) | 7,451 | ||||||||
Real estate construction |
80 | (483 | ) | (403 | ) | |||||||
Real estate residential |
(449 | ) | (151 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||||
Consumer |
1,528 | 221 | 1,749 | |||||||||
Total loans (1) |
13,765 | (2,039 | ) | 11,726 | ||||||||
Total increase (decrease) in interest
and fee income (1) |
12,093 | (2,131 | ) | 9,962 | ||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction |
347 | (563 | ) | (216 | ) | |||||||
Time less than $100,000 |
940 | (1,312 | ) | (372 | ) | |||||||
Time $100,000 or more |
407 | (1,506 | ) | (1,099 | ) | |||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,694 | (3,381 | ) | (1,687 | ) | |||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
(486 | ) | (663 | ) | (1,149 | ) | ||||||
Debt financing and notes payable |
(134 | ) | 32 | (102 | ) | |||||||
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense |
1,074 | (4,012 | ) | (2,938 | ) | |||||||
Increase in |
||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (1) |
$ | 11,019 | $ | 1,881 | $ | 12,900 | ||||||
(1) | Amounts calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current statutory
federal tax rate. |
- 34 -
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
compared with | ||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Interest and fee income: |
||||||||||||
Money market assets and funds sold |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||
Available for sale |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
439 | (945 | ) | (506 | ) | |||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
(1,983 | ) | (493 | ) | (2,476 | ) | ||||||
Held to maturity |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
(3,818 | ) | 520 | (3,298 | ) | |||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
(935 | ) | 348 | (587 | ) | |||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
14,655 | (4,284 | ) | 10,371 | ||||||||
Tax-exempt (1) |
(1,139 | ) | 171 | (968 | ) | |||||||
Commercial real estate |
22,130 | (3,218 | ) | 18,912 | ||||||||
Real estate construction |
(147 | ) | (1,710 | ) | (1,857 | ) | ||||||
Real estate residential |
(1,048 | ) | (171 | ) | (1,219 | ) | ||||||
Consumer |
4,311 | 607 | 4,918 | |||||||||
Total loans (1) |
38,762 | (8,605 | ) | 30,157 | ||||||||
Total increase (decrease) in interest
and fee income (1) |
32,465 | (9,175 | ) | 23,290 | ||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction |
646 | (1,638 | ) | (992 | ) | |||||||
Time less than $100,000 |
2,302 | (3,896 | ) | (1,594 | ) | |||||||
Time $100,000 or more |
1,496 | (4,996 | ) | (3,500 | ) | |||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
4,444 | (10,530 | ) | (6,086 | ) | |||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
(1,481 | ) | (5,593 | ) | (7,074 | ) | ||||||
Debt financing and notes payable |
(325 | ) | (88 | ) | (413 | ) | ||||||
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense |
2,638 | (16,211 | ) | (13,573 | ) | |||||||
Increase in |
||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (1) |
$ | 29,827 | $ | 7,036 | $ | 36,863 | ||||||
(1) | Amounts calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current statutory
federal tax rate. |
Provision for Loan Lossess
The Company manages credit costs by consistently enforcing conservative underwriting and
administration procedures and aggressively pursuing collection efforts with troubled debtors.
County loans purchased from the FDIC are covered by loss-sharing agreements the Company entered
with the FDIC. Further, the Company recorded the purchased County loans at estimated fair value
upon acquisition as of February 6, 2009. Due to the loss-sharing agreements and February 6, 2009
fair value recognition, the Company did not record a provision for loan losses during the first
nine months of 2009 related to covered loans. The Company provided $2.8 million for loan losses
related to non-covered loans in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $600 thousand in the third
quarter of 2008. For the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, $7.2 million and $1.8 million were
provided in each respective period. The provision reflects Managements assessment of credit risk
and the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses for each of the periods presented. For
further information regarding credit risk, the FDIC loss-sharing agreements, net credit losses and
the allowance for loan losses, see the Classified Assets, Nonperforming Assets, and Allowance
for Credit Losses section of this report.
- 35 -
Table of Contents
Noninterest Income
The following table summarizes the components of noninterest income (loss) for the periods
indicated.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 9,479 | $ | 7,555 | $ | 27,017 | $ | 22,379 | ||||||||
Merchant credit card fees |
2,163 | 2,611 | 6,818 | 7,903 | ||||||||||||
Debit card fees |
1,267 | 970 | 3,656 | 2,852 | ||||||||||||
ATM fees and interchange |
965 | 756 | 2,792 | 2,238 | ||||||||||||
Other service fees |
558 | 495 | 1,629 | 1,517 | ||||||||||||
Trust fees |
319 | 293 | 1,056 | 973 | ||||||||||||
Check sale income |
223 | 193 | 661 | 569 | ||||||||||||
Financial services commissions |
129 | 186 | 420 | 689 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking income |
26 | 39 | 68 | 106 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of Visa common stock |
| | | 5,698 | ||||||||||||
FAS 141R gain |
| | 48,844 | | ||||||||||||
Net losses from equity securities |
| (41,206 | ) | | (59,384 | ) | ||||||||||
Other noninterest income |
832 | 609 | 3,354 | 2,497 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 15,961 | $ | (27,499 | ) | $ | 96,315 | $ | (11,963 | ) | ||||||
Noninterest income for the third quarter of 2009 was $16.0 million compared with a noninterest loss
of $27.5 million in the same period in 2008. The increase was mostly attributable to $41.2 million
in losses on sale and other than temporary impairment charge on FHLMC and FNMA preferred stock in
the third quarter 2008. Higher service charges on deposit accounts (up $1.9 million or 25.5%),
debit card fees (up $297 thousand or 30.6%) and ATM fees and interchange income (up $209 thousand
or 27.6%) were generally attributable to the growth in deposit accounts through the County
acquisition. Other noninterest income increased $223 thousand mainly due to $151 thousand in
miscellaneous income from County operations and a $45 thousand increase in gains on sale of OREO.
Merchant credit card fees declined $448 thousand or 17.2% due to lower transaction volume and the
impact of prevailing economic conditions on consumer spending.
In the first nine months of 2009, noninterest income was $96.3 million compared with a noninterest
loss of $12.0 million in the corresponding period of 2008 primarily due to a $48.8 million FAS 141R
gain and a $4.6 million or 20.7% increase in service charges on deposit accounts in the first nine
months of 2009 and because noninterest income in the first nine months of 2008 was reduced by $59.4
million in losses on sale and other than temporary impairment charge on FHLMC and FNMA preferred
stock. Higher service charges on deposit accounts were attributable to growth in deposit accounts
through the County acquisition in February of 2009. The County acquisition was accounted for under
the acquisition method of accounting. The purchased assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at
their acquisition date fair values, and identifiable intangible assets were recorded at fair value.
The FAS 141R gain totaling $48.8 million resulted from the amount by which the fair value of assets
purchased exceeded the fair value of liabilities assumed. Debit card fees and ATM fees and
interchange income increased $804 thousand or 28.2% and $554 thousand or 24.8%, respectively,
mainly due to an increased customer base through the County acquisition. Other noninterest income
increased $857 thousand largely due to $927 thousand in miscellaneous income from County
operations. Merchant credit card income declined $1.1 million or 13.7% primarily due to lower
transaction volume and the impact of prevailing economic conditions on consumer spending.
Offsetting the increase was a $5.7 million gain on sale of Visa common stock in the first nine
months of 2008 and a $269 thousand decrease in financial services commissions.
- 36 -
Table of Contents
Noninterest Expense
The following table summarizes the components of noninterest expense for the periods indicated.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries and related benefits |
$ | 16,402 | $ | 12,621 | $ | 50,221 | $ | 38,670 | ||||||||
Occupancy |
4,008 | 3,465 | 14,831 | 10,297 | ||||||||||||
Outsourced data processing services |
2,258 | 2,098 | 6,740 | 6,323 | ||||||||||||
Equipment |
1,789 | 903 | 4,618 | 2,825 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangibles |
1,671 | 788 | 5,051 | 2,433 | ||||||||||||
FDIC insurance assessments |
1,442 | 131 | 4,820 | 359 | ||||||||||||
Courier service |
989 | 835 | 2,881 | 2,488 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees |
913 | 485 | 2,580 | 1,704 | ||||||||||||
Telephone |
622 | 342 | 1,487 | 1,023 | ||||||||||||
Postage |
576 | 369 | 1,570 | 1,142 | ||||||||||||
Stationery and supplies |
450 | 272 | 1,191 | 836 | ||||||||||||
Loan expense |
491 | 246 | 1,689 | 653 | ||||||||||||
Correspondent service charges |
302 | 178 | 892 | 498 | ||||||||||||
Operational losses |
242 | 113 | 658 | 494 | ||||||||||||
Advertising/public relations |
229 | 191 | 809 | 660 | ||||||||||||
Visa litigation expense |
| | | (2,338 | ) | |||||||||||
Other noninterest expense |
2,767 | 2,166 | 7,902 | 6,529 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 35,151 | $ | 25,203 | $ | 107,940 | $ | 74,596 | ||||||||
Average full time equivalent staff |
1,086 | 899 | 1,135 | 892 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense to revenues (FTE) |
45.32 | % | 118.92 | % | 38.61 | % | 55.48 | % |
Noninterest expense increased $9.9 million or 39.5% in the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared with the same period in 2008 mainly due to acquisition related incremental costs and
higher FDIC insurance assessments (up 1.3 million). Salaries and related benefits increased $3.8
million or 30.0% primarily due to personnel costs related to the County acquisition. Occupancy
expense increased $543 thousand or 15.7% mainly due to rent and maintenance costs for Countys
branches and other facilities. Outsourced data processing services expense increased $160 thousand
or 7.6% mostly due to the County acquisition. Equipment expense increased $886 thousand primarily
due to additional expenses for former County branches. Amortization of deposit intangibles
increased $883 thousand due to amortization of the core deposit intangible asset recognized for the
assumed County deposit base. Professional fees were higher by $428 thousand generally due to higher
legal fees for loans acquired from County and other professional fees, partly offset by
reimbursements from the FDIC. Postage increased $207 thousand largely due to increased customer
base and branch consolidation notices to customers.
Stationary and supplies expense increased $178 thousand mostly due to printing branch consolidation
notices to customers and supplying former County branches with Westamerica forms. Other expenses
also increased due to the County acquisition, including courier services (up $154 thousand),
telephone expense (up $280 thousand), loan expense (up $245 thousand), correspondent service
charges (up $124 thousand) and operational losses (up $129 thousand). Other miscellaneous
noninterest expense increased $601 thousand primarily due to a $200 thousand reduction in unfunded
loan commitments in the third quarter 2008 and increases in insurance costs (up $138 thousand), low
income housing amortization (up $120 thousand) and ATM network fees (up $98 thousand).
- 37 -
Table of Contents
Noninterest expense increased $33.3 million or 44.7% in the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared with the same period in 2008 mainly due to acquisition related incremental costs, higher
FDIC insurance assessments costs and the reversal of a $2.3 million accrual for Visa related
litigation in the first nine months of 2008. Salaries and related benefits increased $11.6 million
or 29.9% primarily due to personnel costs related to the County acquisition. Occupancy expense
increased $4.5 million or 44.0% mainly due to rent and maintenance costs for Countys branches.
Equipment expense increased $1.8 million primarily due to additional expenses for former County
branches. FDIC insurance assessments increased from $359 thousand in the first nine months of 2008
to $4.8 million in the corresponding period in 2009. Amortization of deposit intangibles
increased
$2.6 million due to amortization of the core deposit intangible asset recognized for the assumed
County deposit base. Professional fees increased $876 thousand generally due to higher legal fees
for loans acquired from County, issuance of preferred stock and other professional fees, partially
reduced by FDIC reimbursements. Postage increased $428 thousand mainly due to mailings of welcome
packages and branch consolidation notices to former County customers. Stationary and supplies
expense increased $355 thousand mostly due to printing welcome packages and branch consolidation
notices to customers and supplying former County branches with Westamerica forms. Loan expense
increased $1.0 million due to the County acquisition, including servicing fees on factoring
receivables acquired from County. Such factoring receivables were fully liquidated in April 2009.
Other categories of expenses increased due to the acquisition including outsourced data processing
services expense (up $417 thousand), courier services (up $393 thousand), telephone expense (up
$464 thousand), correspondent service charges (up $394 thousand) and operational losses (up $164
thousand) and advertising and public relations expenses (up $149 thousand). Other miscellaneous
noninterest expense also increased $1.4 million mainly due to a $562 thousand increase in low
income housing investment amortization, a $426 thousand increase in ATM and debit card network fees
and insurance costs (up $128 thousand), partially offset by a $200 thousand increase in a reduction
in reserve for unfunded loan commitments.
The Company completed County Bank systems integrations and branch consolidations in August 2009. As
a result, Management expects lower personnel, occupancy, equipment and other costs in the fourth
quarter 2009, relative to the third quarter 2009.
The Bank must pay the FDIC assessments to provide FDIC insurance on its customers deposit balances
subject to FDIC insurance limits. Under current risk-based assessment rates, the Bank pays the
lowest assessment rate. Based on current deposit balances, the Bank estimates quarterly FDIC
insurance assessments of $1.5 million, subject to changes in the assessment rate structure and any
additional special assessments. Given the depleted nature of the Deposit Insurance Fund and
financial condition of the banking industry, the amount of FDIC assessments could increase in the
future.
Provision for Income Tax
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded income tax provision (FTE) of $14.3 million,
compared with $4.7 million in tax benefits in the third quarter 2008. The current quarter provision
reflected a $587 thousand reduction in income tax provision as the Company reversed tax reserves
for uncertain tax positions upon the expiration of the statute of limitations for the 2005 federal
return. The third quarter 2009 income tax provision (FTE) represents an effective tax rate (FTE) of
36.2%. During the third quarter 2008, the Company filed its 2007 federal income tax return. Amounts
included in that filed return were reconciled to estimates of such amounts used to recognize the
2007 federal income tax provision. As a result, a reduction in the tax provision in the amount of
$877 thousand was recognized in the third quarter 2008 to adjust the 2007 tax estimates to amounts
included in the filed tax return. The adjustment primarily resulted from higher than anticipated
tax credits earned on limited partnership investments providing low-income housing and housing for
the elderly in our Northern and Central California communities.
On a year-to-date basis, the income tax provision (FTE) was $63.2 million for the first nine months
of 2009 compared with $19.0 million for the corresponding period of 2008. The increase in pretax
earnings was greater than the increase in the preference items. As such, the first nine months of
2009 effective tax rate of 38.4% compared with 32.8% for the same period of 2008. The tax provision
for the first nine months of 2009 included a $587 thousand reduction in income tax provision as the
Company reversed tax reserves for uncertain tax positions upon the expiration of the statute of
limitations for the 2005 federal return. The tax provision for the first nine months of 2008
included a $25 million tax benefit related to the FHLMC
and FNMA preferred stock losses and securities impairment charge and the $877 thousand 2007 tax
return to provision benefit reconciliation mentioned above, partially offset by an increase due to
the higher tax rate for the income related to the Visa IPO.
- 38 -
Table of Contents
Loan Portfolio Credit Risk
The risk that loan customers do not repay loans granted by the Bank is the most significant risk to
the Company. The Company closely monitors the markets in which it conducts its lending operations
and follows a strategy to control exposure to loans with high credit risk. The Banks organization
structure separates the functions of business development and loan underwriting; Management
believes this segregation of duties avoids inherent conflicts of centralizing business development
and loan approval. In measuring credit risk, Management follows practices customary in the
commercial banking industry.
| The Bank maintains a Loan Review Department with reports directly to the Board of
Directors. The Loan Review Department performs independent evaluations of loans and assigns
credit risk grades to evaluated loans using grading standards employed by bank regulatory
agencies. Those loans judged to carry higher risk attributes are referred to as classified
loans. Classified loans receive elevated management attention to maximize collection. |
||
| The Bank maintains two loan administration offices whose sole responsibility is to
manage and collect classified loans. |
Classified loans with higher levels of credit risk are further designated as nonaccrual loans.
Management places loans on nonaccrual status when full collection of contractual interest and
principal payments is in doubt. Interest previously accrued on loans placed on nonaccrual status is
charged against interest income, net of estimated FDIC reimbursements under loss sharing
agreements. The Company does not accrue interest income on nonaccrual loans. Interest payments
received on nonaccrual loans are applied to reduce the carrying amount of the loan unless the
carrying amount is well secured by loan collateral or covered by FDIC loss-sharing agreements.
Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, loans 90 or more days past due and still accruing,
and repossessed loan collateral.
On February 6, 2009, the Bank purchased loans and repossessed loan collateral of the former County
Bank from the FDIC. This purchase transaction included loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC
wherein the FDIC and the Bank share losses on the purchased assets. The loss-sharing agreements
significantly reduce the credit risk of these purchased assets. In evaluating credit risk,
Management bifurcates the Banks total loan portfolio between those loans qualifying under the
FDIC loss-sharing agreements (referred to as covered loans) and loans not qualifying under the
FDIC loss-sharing agreements (referred to as non-covered loans). At September 30, 2009, covered
loans totaled $933 million (net), or 29 percent of total loans, and non-covered loans totaled $2.3
billion, or 71 percent of total loans.
Covered Loans and Repossessed Loan Collateral (Covered Assets)
Covered loans and repossessed loan collateral qualify under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC.
Under the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC absorbs 80 percent of losses and shares in
80 percent of loss recoveries on the first $269 million in losses on covered assets (First Tier),
and absorbs 95 percent of losses and shares in 95 percent of loss recoveries exceeding $269 million
(Second Tier). The term of the loss sharing agreement on residential real estate assets is ten
years, while the term for loss sharing on non-residential real estate assets is five years in
respect to losses and eight years in respect to loss recoveries.
The covered assets are primarily located in the California Central Valley, including Merced County.
This geographic area currently has some of the weakest economic conditions within California and
has experienced significant declines in real estate values. Management expects higher loss rates on
covered assets than on noncovered assets.
The Bank recorded acquired covered assets at estimated fair value on the February 6, 2009
acquisition date. The credit risk discount ascribed to the $1.2 billion acquired loan and
repossessed loan collateral portfolio was $161 million representing estimated losses inherent in
the assets at the acquisition date. The Bank also recorded a related receivable from the FDIC in
the amount of $129 million representing estimated FDIC reimbursements under the loss-sharing
agreements.
In Managements judgment, the fair value discount recognized for the acquired assets remains
adequate as an estimate of credit risk in covered assets as of September 30, 2009. In the event
credit risk deteriorates beyond that estimated by Management, losses in excess of the fair value
credit discount would be recognized, net of related FDIC loss indemnification.
- 39 -
Table of Contents
The maximum risk to future earnings if First Tier losses exceed Managements estimated $161 million
in recognized losses under the FDIC loss-sharing agreements follows:
First Tier Loss Coverage |
$ | 269 million | ||
Less: Recognized credit risk discount |
$ | 161 million | ||
Exposure to under-estimated risk within FirstTier |
$ | 108 million | ||
Bank loss-sharing percentage |
20 percent | |||
First Tier risk to Bank, pre-tax |
$ | 22 million | ||
First Tier risk to Bank, after-tax |
$ | 13 million | ||
Of the estimated $161 million in recognized credit risk at February 6, 2009, the Company has
realized losses of $58 million. Management has judged the likelihood of experiencing losses of a
magnitude to trigger Second Tier FDIC reimbursement as remote. The Banks total after-tax exposure
to Second Tier losses is $24 million as of September 30, 2009.
The following is a summary of covered classified loans and repossessed loan collateral as of
September 30, 2009:
At September 30, | ||||
2009 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Covered Classified Assets |
||||
Classified loans |
$ | 174,583 | ||
Repossessed loan collateral |
18,740 | |||
Total |
$ | 193,323 | ||
The following is a summary of covered nonperforming assets as of September 30, 2009:
At September 30, | ||||
2009 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Covered nonperforming assets |
||||
Performing, nonaccrual loans |
$ | 26,277 | ||
Nonperforming, nonaccrual loans |
53,255 | |||
Total nonaccrual loans |
79,532 | |||
Loans 90 days past due and
still accruing |
935 | |||
Total nonperforming loans |
80,467 | |||
Covered repossessed loan collateral |
18,740 | |||
Total |
$ | 99,207 | ||
As a percentage of total covered loans and OREO |
10.43 | % |
Noncovered Classified Loans and Repossessed Loan Collateral (Noncovered Assets)
The following is a summary of non-covered classified loans and repossessed loan collateral:
At September 30, | At December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-covered Classified Assets |
||||||||
Classified loans |
$ | 66,810 | $ | 34,028 | ||||
Repossessed loan collateral |
4,319 | 3,505 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 71,129 | $ | 37,533 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses /
non-covered classified loans |
64 | % | 131 | % |
- 40 -
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of non-covered nonperforming assets on the dates indicated:
At September 30, | At December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-covered nonperforming assets |
||||||||
Performing, nonaccrual loans |
$ | 61 | $ | 1,143 | ||||
Nonperforming, nonaccrual loans |
31,352 | 8,883 | ||||||
Total nonaccrual loans |
31,413 | 10,026 | ||||||
Loans 90 days past due and
still accruing |
1,212 | 755 | ||||||
Total nonperforming loans |
32,625 | 10,781 | ||||||
Repossessed loan collateral |
4,319 | 3,505 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 36,944 | $ | 14,286 | ||||
As a percentage of total non-covered loans and repossessed loan collateral |
1.63 | % | 0.60 | % |
Non-covered nonaccrual loans increased $19.2 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009. Fifty nine loans comprised the $31.4 million in nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2009.
The increase in non-covered nonperforming loans is primarily due to two residential construction
loan relationships for single family properties ($8.4 million), twelve consumer mortgages ($5.8
million), and two commercial real estate relationships ($5.3 million) placed on nonaccrual status
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The Company actively pursues full collection of
nonaccrual loans.
The Company had no restructured loans as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Non-covered commercial loans, non-covered construction loans and non-covered commercial real estate
loans on accrual status were as follows:
At September 30, | At December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-covered commercial loans: |
||||||||
30-89 days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 7,687 | $ | 3,559 | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered commercial loans |
1.54 | % | 0.70 | % | ||||
90 or more days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 602 | $ | -0- | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered commercial loans |
0.12 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Non-covered construction loans: |
||||||||
30-89 days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 459 | $ | 3,393 | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered construction loans |
1.12 | % | 6.44 | % | ||||
90 or more days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | -0- | $ | -0- | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered construction loans |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Non-covered commercial real estate loans: |
||||||||
30-89 days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 13,095 | $ | 5,993 | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered commercial real estate loans |
1.62 | % | 0.73 | % | ||||
90 or more days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | -0- | $ | -0- | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered commercial real estate loans |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
- 41 -
Table of Contents
The Companys residential real estate loan underwriting standards for first mortgages limit the
loan amount to no more than 80 percent of the appraised value of the property serving as collateral
for the loan at the time of origination, and require verification of income of the borrower(s). The
Company had no sub-prime non-covered loans as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. At
September 30, 2009, $5.8 million non-covered residential real estate loans were on nonaccrual
status. Non-covered residential real estate loans, non-covered automobile loans and non-covered
other consumer loans on accrual status were as follows:
At September 30, | At December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-covered residential real estate loans: |
||||||||
30-89 days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 1,569 | $ | 3,273 | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered residential real estate loans |
0.39 | % | 0.71 | % | ||||
90 or more days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | -0- | $ | -0- | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered residential real estate loans |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Non-covered automobile loans: |
||||||||
30-89 days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 6,229 | $ | 5,241 | ||||
Percentage of total automobile loans |
1.37 | % | 1.12 | % | ||||
90 or more days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 574 | $ | 569 | ||||
Percentage of total automobile loans |
0.13 | % | 0.12 | % | ||||
Non-covered other consumer loans: |
||||||||
30-89 days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 1,321 | $ | 896 | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered other consumer loans |
1.65 | % | 1.49 | % | ||||
90 or more days delinquent: |
||||||||
Dollar amount |
$ | 36 | $ | 186 | ||||
Percentage of total non-covered other consumer loans |
0.04 | % | 0.31 | % |
The amount of gross interest income that would have been recorded for nonaccrual loans for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, if all such loans had been current in accordance
with their original terms, was $1.8 million and $3.4 million, respectively, compared with $184
thousand and $466 thousand, respectively, for the comparable periods of 2008.
The amount of interest income that was recognized on nonaccrual loans from all cash payments,
including those related to interest owed from prior years, made during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, totaled $536 thousand and $660 thousand, respectively, compared with $48
thousand and $312 thousand, respectively, for the comparable periods of 2008. These cash payments
represent annualized yields of 1.91% and 1.23%, respectively, for the third quarter and the first
nine months of 2009 compared with 1.56% and 4.26%, respectively, for the respective periods of
2008.
Total cash payments received during the third quarter and the first nine months of 2009 which were
applied against the book balance of nonaccrual loans outstanding at September 30, 2009 totaled $-0-
and $1 thousand, respectively. There were no cash payments received in the first
nine months of 2008, which were applied against the book balances of nonaccrual loans outstanding
at September 30, 2008.
Management believes the overall credit quality of the non-covered loan portfolio is reasonably
stable; however, non-covered nonperforming assets could fluctuate from period to period. The
performance of any individual loan can be affected by external factors such as the interest rate
environment, economic conditions, collateral values or factors particular to the borrower. No
assurance can be given that additional increases in non-covered nonaccrual loans will not occur in
the future.
- 42 -
Table of Contents
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Companys allowance for credit losses represents Managements estimate of credit losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. In evaluating credit risk for loans, Management measures loss
potential of the carrying value of loans. As described in the Nonperforming Loans section above,
payments on nonaccrual loans may be applied against the principal balance of the loans until such
time as full collection of the remaining recorded balance is expected. Further, the carrying value
of covered loans includes fair value discounts assigned at the time of purchase under the
provisions of FASB ASC 8050, Business Combinations, and FASB ASC 310-30, Loans or Debt Securities
with Deteriorated Credit Quality. The allowance for credit losses represents Managements estimate
of credit losses in excess of these principal reductions.
Management determined the fair value discounts assigned to covered loans purchased on February
6, 2009 remained adequate as an estimate of credit losses inherent in covered loans as of September
30, 2009.
The following table summarizes the credit loss provision, net credit losses and allowance for
credit losses for the periods indicated:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 45,815 | $ | 54,257 | $ | 47,563 | $ | 55,799 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,800 | 600 | 7,200 | 1,800 | ||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded commitments |
0 | (200 | ) | (400 | ) | (200 | ) | |||||||||
Loans charged off: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial and commercial real estate |
(1,514 | ) | (261 | ) | (3,288 | ) | (1,076 | ) | ||||||||
Real estate construction |
0 | 0 | (311 | ) | (783 | ) | ||||||||||
Real estate residential |
(114 | ) | 0 | (242 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||
Consumer |
(2,242 | ) | (1,525 | ) | (6,894 | ) | (3,673 | ) | ||||||||
Total non-covered loans chargeoffs
|
(3,870 | ) | (1,786 | ) | (10,735 | ) | (5,532 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries of previously
charged off non-covered loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial and commercial real estate |
110 | 66 | 258 | 241 | ||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
6 | 0 | 14 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Real estate residential |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
515 | 253 | 1,476 | 1,082 | ||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
631 | 319 | 1,748 | 1,323 | ||||||||||||
Net loan losses |
(3,239 | ) | (1,467 | ) | (8,987 | ) | (4,209 | ) | ||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 45,376 | $ | 53,190 | $ | 45,376 | $ | 53,190 | ||||||||
Components: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ | 42,683 | $ | 50,097 | ||||||||||||
Reserve for unfunded credit commitments |
2,693 | 3,093 | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses |
$ | 45,376 | $ | 53,190 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses /
non-covered loans outstanding |
1.88 | % | 2.08 | % |
- 43 -
Table of Contents
The Companys allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide
for losses that can be estimated based upon specific and general conditions. These include
conditions unique to individual borrowers, as well as overall credit loss experience, the amount of
past due, nonperforming loans and classified loans, FDIC loss sharing coverage relative to covered
loan carrying amounts, recommendations of regulatory authorities, prevailing economic conditions
and other factors. A portion of the allowance is specifically allocated to impaired loans whose
full collectibility is uncertain. Such allocations are determined by Management based on
loan-by-loan analyses. A second allocation is based in part on quantitative analyses of historical
credit loss experience, in which criticized and classified credit balances identified through an
independent internal credit review process are analyzed using a linear regression model to
determine standard loss rates. The results of this analysis are applied to current criticized and
classified loan balances to allocate the allowance to the respective segments of the loan
portfolio. In addition, loans with similar characteristics not usually criticized using regulatory
guidelines are analyzed based on the historical loss rates and delinquency trends, grouped by the
number of days the payments on these loans are delinquent. Given currently weak economic
conditions, Management is applying further analysis to consumer loans. Current levels of automobile
loan losses are compared to initial allowance allocations and, based on Management judgment,
additional allocations are applied, if needed, to estimate losses. For residential real estate
loans, Management is comparing ultimate loss rates on foreclosed residential real estate properties
and applying such loss rates to nonaccrual residential real estate loans. Based on this analysis,
Management exercises judgment in allocating additional allowance if deemed appropriate to estimate
losses on residential real estate loans.
Last, allocations are made to non-criticized and non-classified commercial loans based on
historical loss rates and other statistical data. The remainder of the allowance is considered to
be unallocated. The unallocated allowance is established to provide for probable losses that have
been incurred as of the reporting date but not reflected in the allocated allowance. It addresses
additional qualitative factors consistent with Managements analysis of the level of risks inherent
in the loan portfolio, which are related to the risks of the Companys general lending activity.
Included in the unallocated allowance is the risk of losses that are attributable to national or
local economic or industry trends which have occurred but have not yet been recognized in past loan
charge-off history (external factors). The external factors evaluated by the Company include:
economic and business conditions, external competitive issues, and other factors. Also included in
the unallocated allowance is the risk of losses attributable to general attributes of the Companys
loan portfolio and credit administration (internal factors). The internal factors evaluated by the
Company include: loan review system, adequacy of lending Management and staff, loan policies and
procedures, problem loan trends, concentrations of credit, and other factors. By their nature,
these risks are not readily allocable to any specific loan category in a statistically meaningful
manner and are difficult to quantify with a specific number. Management assigns a range of
estimated risk to the qualitative risk factors described above based on Managements judgment as to
the level of risk, and assigns a quantitative risk factor from the range of loss estimates to
determine the appropriate level of the unallocated portion of the allowance. Management considers
the $45.4 million allowance for credit losses to be adequate as a reserve against non-covered
credit losses as of September 30, 2009.
The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for credit losses:
At September 30, | At December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-covered | Non-covered | |||||||||||||||
Loans as | Loans as | |||||||||||||||
Allocation | Percent | Allocation | Percent | |||||||||||||
of the | of Total | of the | of Total | |||||||||||||
Allowance | Non-covered | Allowance | Non-covered | |||||||||||||
Balance | Loans | Balance | Loans | |||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 19,166 | 58 | % | $ | 23,774 | 57 | % | ||||||||
Real estate construction |
5,634 | 2 | % | 4,725 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
Real estate residential |
1,150 | 18 | % | 367 | 19 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer |
8,071 | 22 | % | 6,331 | 22 | % | ||||||||||
Unallocated portion |
11,355 | | 12,366 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 45,376 | 100 | % | $ | 47,563 | 100 | % | ||||||||
- 44 -
Table of Contents
The allocation to loan portfolio segments changed from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009. The
decrease in allocation for commercial loans was substantially attributable to a lower allocation to
municipal loans and Managements evaluation of loss rates against commercial loan performance
metrics. The increase in allocation to real estate construction loans reflects an increase in
criticized construction loans outstanding, which receive higher allocations due to higher risk
attributes, offset in part by lower volumes of non-criticized construction loans and construction
loan commitments. The increase in the allocation to real estate residential loans is due to
Managements judgment regarding the appropriate allocation based on recent foreclosure losses and
increased levels of nonaccrual mortgages. The higher allocation for consumer loans was primarily
due to Managements judgment regarding the appropriate allocation based on current levels of auto
loan chargeoffs. The unallocated portion of the allowance for credit losses decreased $1.0 million
from December 31,
2008 to September 30, 2009. The unallocated allowance is established to provide
for probable losses that have been incurred, but not reflected in the allocated allowance. At
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Managements evaluations of the unallocated portion of
the allowance for credit losses attributed significant risk levels to developing economic and
business conditions ($2.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively), external competitive issues
($803 thousand and $1.2 million, respectively), internal credit administration considerations ($1.6
million and $1.4 million, respectively), and delinquency and problem loan trends ($3.9 million and
$3.5 million, respectively). The change in the amounts allocated to the above qualitative risk
factors was based upon Managements judgment, review of trends in its loan portfolio, extent of
migration of previously non-classified loans to classified status, levels of the allowance
allocated to portfolio segments, and current economic conditions in its marketplace. Based on
Managements analysis and judgment, the amount of the unallocated portion of the allowance for
credit losses was $11.4 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $12.4 million at December 31,
2008.
Asset/Liability and Market Risk Management
Asset/liability management involves the evaluation, monitoring and management of interest rate
risk, market risk, liquidity and funding. The fundamental objective of the Companys management of
assets and liabilities is to maximize its economic value while maintaining adequate liquidity and a
conservative level of interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is a significant market risk affecting the Company. Interest rate risk results
from many factors. Assets and liabilities may mature or reprice at different times. Assets and
liabilities may reprice at the same time but by different amounts. Short-term and long-term market
interest rates may change by different amounts. The remaining maturity of various assets or
liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change. In addition, interest rates may have
an impact on loan demand, credit losses, and other sources of earnings such as account analysis
fees on commercial deposit accounts and correspondent bank service charges.
In adjusting the Companys asset/liability position, Management attempts to manage interest rate
risk while enhancing the net interest margin and net interest income. At times, depending on
expected increases or decreases in general interest rates, the relationship between long and short
term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, Management may adjust the Companys
interest rate risk position in order to manage its net interest margin and net interest income.
The Companys exposure to changes in interest rates has declined significantly over the past twelve
months. The Banks balance sheet has been in a liability sensitive position during the past
twelve months. A liability sensitive position exists when interest-bearing liabilities subject to
immediate and near-term interest rate changes will likely cause a greater change in interest
expense than the corresponding change in interest income generated by interest-sensitive loans and
investment securities. A liability sensitive position can increase net interest income when
interest rates are declining, and can reduce net interest income when interest rates are rising.
Given the recent decline in interest rates to very low levels, Management employed tactics to
reduce the liability sensitive position of the Banks assets and liabilities. The principle tactic
employed was to deploy investment security liquidity to retire the most interest sensitive
liabilities, primarily federal funds purchased, and higher costing liabilities. No assurances can
be given as to the actual impact on net interest income caused by changes in
interest rates. Management continues to monitor the interest rate environment as well as economic
conditions and other factors it deems relevant in managing the Companys exposure to interest rate
risk. The Companys results of operations and net portfolio values remain subject to changes in
interest rates and to fluctuations in the difference between long and short term interest rates.
Management assesses interest rate risk by comparing the Companys most likely earnings plan with
various earnings models using many interest rate scenarios that differ in the direction of interest
rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the
yield curve. For example, using the current composition of the Companys balance sheet and assuming
no change in the federal funds rate and no change in the 10 year Constant Maturity Treasury Bond
yield during the same period, earnings are not estimated to change by a meaningful amount compared
to the Companys most likely net income plan for the twelve months ending September 30, 2010.
Conversely, using the current composition of the Companys balance sheet and assuming an increase
of 100 bp in the federal funds rate and an increase of 10 bp in the 10 year Constant Maturity
Treasury Bond yield during the same period, earnings are not estimated to change by a meaningful
amount compared to the Companys most likely net income plan for the twelve months ending September
30, 2010. Simulation estimates depend on, and will change with, the size and mix of the actual and
projected balance sheet at the time of each simulation. Management is currently deploying tactics
to reduce the liability sensitivity of the Companys balance sheet to a more neutral condition
where changes in interest rates result in less significant changes in earnings. The Company does
not currently engage in trading activities or use derivative instruments to control interest rate
risk, even though such activities may be permitted with the approval of the Companys Board of
Directors.
- 45 -
Table of Contents
Market Risk Equity Markets
Equity price risk can affect the Company. As an example, any preferred or common stock holdings, as
permitted by banking regulations, can fluctuate in value. Management regularly assesses the extent
and duration of any declines in market value, the causes of such declines, the likelihood of a
recovery in market value, and its intent to hold securities until a recovery in value occurs.
Declines in value of preferred or common stock holdings that are deemed other than temporary
could result in loss recognition in the Companys income statement.
Fluctuations in the Companys common stock price can impact the Companys financial results in
several ways. First, the Company has at times repurchased and retired its common stock; the market
price paid to retire the Companys common stock can affect the level of the Companys shareholders
equity, cash flows and shares outstanding for purposes of computing earnings per share. On February
13, 2009, the Company issued preferred stock to the Treasury: the terms of such issuance limit the
Companys ability to repurchase stock. Second, the Companys common stock price impacts the number
of dilutive equivalent shares used to compute diluted earnings per share. Third, fluctuations in
the Companys common stock price can motivate holders of options to purchase Company common stock
through the exercise of such options thereby increasing the number of shares outstanding. Finally,
the amount of compensation expense associated with share based compensation fluctuates with changes
in and the volatility of the Companys common stock price.
Market Risk Other
Market values of loan collateral can directly impact the level of loan chargeoffs and the provision
for loan losses. Other types of market risk, such as foreign currency exchange risk and commodity
price risk, are not significant in the normal course of the Companys business activities.
Liquidity and Funding
The Company generates significant liquidity from its operating activities. The Companys
profitability during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 contributed substantial operating cash
flows of $134.2 million and $63.3 million, respectively. In the first nine months of 2009, the
Company paid $30.8 million in common shareholder dividends and used $1.5 million to repurchase and
retire common stock. In the first nine months of 2008, the Company paid $30.1 million in
shareholder dividends and used $35.1 million to repurchase and retire common stock.
The Companys routine operating sources of liquidity include investment securities, consumer and
other loans, deposits, and other borrowed funds. During the first nine months of 2009, investment
securities provided $248.2 million in liquidity from paydowns and maturities, and loans provided
$330.6 million in liquidity from scheduled payments and maturities, net of loan fundings. The
Company also raised $83.7 million from the issuance of preferred stock to the United States
Treasury in the first quarter of 2009 and redeemed $42 million of the same preferred stock in the
third quarter of 2009. The Company projects $172 million in additional liquidity from investment
security paydowns and maturities in the twelve months ending September 30, 2010. At September 30,
2009, automobile loans totaled $455 million, which were experiencing stable monthly principal
payments of approximately $17 million during the third quarter of 2009.
During the first nine months of 2009, a portion of the liquidity provided by operating activities,
investment securities and loans provided funds to meet a net reduction in deposits totaling $298.8
million and a reduction in short-term borrowed funds, primarily federal funds purchased which
declined from $335 million at December 31, 2008 to $-0- at September 30, 2009.
During the first nine months of 2008, investment securities provided $266.3 million in liquidity
from paydowns and maturities, and loans provided $89.4 million in liquidity from scheduled payments
and maturities, net of fundings. A portion of liquidity provided by investment securities and loans
provided funds to meet a net reduction in deposits totaling $135.0 million. The remaining liquidity
was used to reduce higher-costing borrowed funds, primarily subordinated debt which decreased $10
million and federal funds purchased which declined $248 million.
- 46 -
Table of Contents
The Company held $1.17 billion in total investment securities at September 30, 2009. Under certain
deposit, borrowing and other arrangements, the Company must hold investment securities as
collateral. At September 30, 2009, such collateral requirements totaled approximately $1.0 billion.
At September 30, 2009, $391.6 million of the Companys investment securities were classified as
available-for-sale, and as such, could provide additional liquidity if sold, subject to the
Companys ability to meet continuing collateral requirements.
At September 30, 2009, $430.0 million in collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and mortgage
backed securities (MBSs) were held in the Companys investment portfolios. None of the CMOs or
MBSs are backed by sub-prime mortgages. All of the Non Agency CMOs are rated investment grade based
on their subordination structures without reliance on monoline insurance. Other than nominal
amounts of FHLMC and FNMA MBSs purchased for Community Reinvestment Act investment purposes, the
Company has not purchased a CMO or MBS since November 2005. The CMOs and MBSs provided $116 million
in liquidity from paydowns during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009,
the Company had customary lines for overnight borrowings from other financial institutions in
excess of $700 million, under which $-0- million was outstanding. Additionally, the Company has
access to borrowing from the Federal Reserve. The Companys short-term debt rating from Fitch
Ratings is F1. The Companys long-term debt rating from Fitch Ratings is A with a stable outlook.
Management expects the Company could access additional long-term debt financing if desired. In
Managements judgment, the Companys liquidity position is strong and asset liquidations or
additional long-term debt are considered unnecessary to meet the ongoing liquidity needs of the
Company.
The Company anticipates maintaining its cash levels throughout the remainder of 2009 mainly through
profitability and retained earnings. It is anticipated that loan demand from credit-worthy
borrowers will remain weak throughout 2009 and early 2010, although such demand will be dictated by
economic and competitive conditions. The Company aggressively solicits non-interest bearing demand
deposits and money market checking deposits, which are the least sensitive to interest rates. The
growth of deposit balances is subject to heightened competition, the success of the Companys sales
efforts, delivery of superior customer service and market conditions. The recent series of
reductions in the federal funds rate resulted in declining short-term interest rates, which could
impact deposit volumes in the future. Depending on economic conditions, interest rate levels, and a
variety of other conditions, deposit growth may be used to fund loans, to reduce short-term
borrowings or purchase investment securities. However, due to concerns such as uncertainty in the
general economic environment, competition and political uncertainty, loan demand and levels of
customer deposits are not certain. Shareholder dividends are expected to continue subject to the
Boards discretion and continuing evaluation of capital levels, earnings, asset quality and other
factors. Quarterly shareholder dividends are restricted to the quarterly per share amount prior to
October 14, 2008, or $0.35 per share, under the terms of the February 13, 2009 issuance of
preferred stock to the Treasury. The Company anticipates applying operating cash flows to redeem
the remaining preferred stock issued to the Treasury.
The Company is a separate entity and apart from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. In
addition to its operating expenses, the Company is responsible for the payment of dividends
declared for its shareholders, and interest and principal on outstanding debt. At times, the
Company has redeemed and returned its stock. Substantially all of the Companys revenues are
obtained from subsidiary service fees and dividends. Payment of such dividends to the Company by
the Bank is limited under California law. The amount that can be paid in any calendar year, without
prior approval from the state regulatory agency, cannot exceed the net profits (as defined) for the
preceding three calendar years less dividends paid. The Company believes that such restriction will
not have an impact on the Companys ability to meet its ongoing cash obligations.
Capital Resources
The Company has historically generated high levels of earnings, which provides a means of raising
capital. The Companys net income applicable to common equity as an annualized percentage of
average common stock equity (return on common equity or ROE) was 22.1% in 2007, 14.8% in 2008
and 28.4% in the first nine months of 2009. The Company also raises capital as employees exercise
stock options, which are awarded as a part of the Companys executive compensation programs to
reinforce shareholders interests in the Management of the Company. Capital raised through the
exercise of stock options totaled $14.6 million in 2007, $25.8 million in 2008 and $11.6 million in
the first nine months of 2009.
The Company paid dividends totaling $40.6 million in 2007, $40.2 million in 2008 and $30.8 million
in the first nine of 2009, which represent dividends per common share of $1.36, $1.39 and $1.06,
respectively. The Companys earnings have historically exceeded dividends paid to shareholders. The
amount of earnings in excess of dividends gives the Company resources to finance growth and
maintain appropriate levels of shareholders equity. In the absence of profitable growth
opportunities, the Company has repurchased and retired its common stock as another means to return
earnings to shareholders. The Company repurchased and retired 1.9 million shares of common stock
valued at $87.1 million in 2007, 719 thousand shares of common stock valued at $35.9 million in
2008 and 32 thousand shares valued at $1.5 million in the first nine months of 2009. Share
repurchases are currently restricted to amounts conducted in coordination with employee benefit
programs under the terms of the February 13, 2009 issuance of preferred stock to the Treasury. On
September 2, 2009 the Company redeemed 41,863 shares of its preferred stock at $1,000 per share.
This $42 million redemption represents fifty percent of the preferred stock issued to the Treasury
on February 13, 2009. Management intends to redeem the remaining preferred stock from operating
cash flows, if deemed appropriate, or through other means.
- 47 -
Table of Contents
The Companys primary capital resource is shareholders equity, which increased $125.9 million or
30.7% at September 30, 2009 from December 31, 2008, primarily due to a $83.8 million issuance of
preferred stock and $101.3 million in profits earned during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, offset by $33.1 million in common and preferred dividends paid and $41.9 million in
redemption of preferred stock.
The following summarizes the ratios of capital to risk-adjusted assets for the Company on the date
indicated:
Minimum | Well-capitalized by | |||||||||||||||||||
At September 30, | At December 31, | Regulatory | Regulatory | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | Requirement | Definition | ||||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital |
13.75 | % | 9.97 | % | 10.47 | % | 4.00 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||
Total Capital |
15.07 | % | 11.25 | % | 11.76 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Leverage ratio |
8.00 | % | 6.94 | % | 7.36 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % |
The risk-based capital ratios increased at September 30, 2009, compared with September 30, 2008,
due to increased Tier I Capital resulting from the February 13, 2009 issuance of $83.7 million in
preferred stock and increased profitability, partially offset by $42 million in redemption of
preferred stock and an increase in risk-weighted assets. The risk-based capital ratios increased at
September 30, 2009, compared with December 31, 2008, due to equity capital increasing faster than
risk-weighted assets. FDIC-covered loans are included in the 20% risk-weighted category due to the
loss sharing agreements.
The following summarizes the ratios of capital to risk-adjusted assets for the Bank on the date
indicated:
Minimum | Well-capitalized by | |||||||||||||||||||
At September 30, | At December 31, | Regulatory | Regulatory | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | Requirement | Definition | ||||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital |
12.93 | % | 9.24 | % | 9.31 | % | 4.00 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||
Total Capital |
14.43 | % | 10.72 | % | 10.78 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Leverage ratio |
7.49 | % | 6.38 | % | 6.52 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % |
The Company contributed $93.7 million in capital to the Bank during the first nine months of 2009
to maintain the Banks well capitalized condition following the February 6, 2009 County Bank
acquisition. The risk-based capital ratios increased at September 30, 2009, compared with September
30, 2008, due to increased Tier I Capital resulting from the capital contribution from the Company
and the retention of earnings, partially offset by an increase in risk-weighted assets. The
risk-based capital ratios increased at September 30, 2009, compared with December 31, 2008, due to
equity capital increasing relatively faster than risk-weighted assets. FDIC-covered loans are
included in the 20% risk-weighted category due to the loss sharing agreements.
The Company and the Bank intend to maintain regulatory capital in excess of the highest regulatory
standard, referred to as well capitalized. The Company and the Bank routinely project capital
levels by analyzing forecasted earnings, credit quality, securities valuations, shareholder
dividends, asset volumes, share repurchase activity, stock option exercise proceeds, and other
factors. Based on current capital projections the Company and the Bank expect to maintain
regulatory capital levels exceeding the well capitalized standard and pay quarterly dividends to
shareholders. The Company intends to redeem its
preferred stock using operating cash flows and, if deemed appropriate, other means. No assurance
can be given that changes in capital management plans will not occur.
- 48 -
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company does not currently engage in trading activities or use derivative instruments to
control interest rate risk, even though such activities may be undertaken with the approval of the
Companys Board of Directors. Interest rate risk as discussed above is the most significant market
risk affecting the Company. Other types of market risk, such as foreign currency exchange risk,
equity price risk and commodity price risk, are not significant in the normal course of the
Companys business activities.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of September 30, 2009. Based
upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded
that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. The evaluation did
not identify any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Due to the nature of the banking business, the Bank is at times party to various legal actions;
generally such actions are of a routine nature and arise in the normal course of business of the
Bank. The Bank is not a party to any pending or threatened legal action that, if determined
adversely to the Bank, is likely in Managements opinion to have a material adverse effect on the
Banks financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
- 49 -
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Previously reported on Form 8-K.
(b) None
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of
Westamerica Bancorporation or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
(c) | (d) | |||||||||||||||
Total | Maximum | |||||||||||||||
Number | Number | |||||||||||||||
of Shares | of Shares | |||||||||||||||
(b) | Purchased | that May | ||||||||||||||
(a) | Average | as Part of | Yet Be | |||||||||||||
Total | Price | Publicly | Purchased | |||||||||||||
Number of | Paid | Announced | Under the | |||||||||||||
Shares | per | Plans | Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Share | or Programs* | Programs | ||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
July 1 through July 31 |
3 | $ | 48.04 | 3 | 1,952 | |||||||||||
August 1 through August 31 |
3 | $ | 52.03 | 3 | 2,000 | |||||||||||
September 1 through September 30 |
2 | $ | 50.99 | 2 | 1,998 | |||||||||||
Total |
8 | $ | 50.45 | 8 | 1,998 | |||||||||||
* | Includes 3 thousand, 3 thousand and 2 thousand shares purchased in July, August and September,
respectively, by the Company in private transactions with the independent administrator of the
Companys Tax Deferred Savings/Retirement Plan (ESOP). The Company includes the shares purchased in
such transactions within the total number of shares authorized for purchase pursuant to the
currently existing publicly announced program. |
The Company repurchases shares of its common stock in the open market to optimize the Companys use
of equity capital and enhance shareholder value and with the intention of lessening the dilutive
impact of issuing new shares to meet stock performance, option plans, and other ongoing
requirements.
Shares were repurchased during the third quarter of 2009 pursuant to a program approved by the
Board of Directors on August 28, 2008 authorizing the purchase of up to 2 million shares of the
Companys common stock from time to time prior to September 1, 2009. A replacement plan was
approved by the Board of Directors on August 27, 2009 to repurchase up to 2 million shares prior to
September 1, 2010.
On February 13, 2009, the Company utilized the Troubled Asset Relief Program and issued 83,726
preferred shares to the United States Treasury at $1,000 per share (Treasury Preferred Stock).
Subsequently, the Company redeemed 41,863 shares of its Treasury Preferred Stock at $1,000 per
share. This $42 million redemption represents fifty percent of the Treasury Preferred Stock.
Management intends to complete full redemption using the Companys operating earnings. However,
until such time, under the terms of the Treasury Preferred Stock, share repurchases are limited to
repurchases related to employee benefit programs.
- 50 -
Table of Contents
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) The exhibit list required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Exhibit Index filed
with this report.
Exhibit 31.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Exhibit 31.2: Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Exhibit 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2: Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
- 51 -
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION |
||
(Registrant) |
||
/s/ John Robert Thorson
|
||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
||
(Chief Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Date: October 30, 2009
- 52 -
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit 31.1: | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
Exhibit 31.2: | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
Exhibit 32.1: | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
Exhibit 32.2: | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
- 53 -