Whitestone REIT - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
|
|
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
|
|
OR
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
file number 000-50256
WHITESTONE
REIT
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland
|
76-0594970
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
2600
South Gessner, Suite 500
|
||
Houston,
Texas
|
77063
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(713)
827-9595
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. x
Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). o
Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) x
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes
x
No
As of May
12, 2009, the registrant had outstanding 10,337,307 Common Shares of Beneficial
Interest, $0.001 par value per share.
Page
|
||||
PART
I—FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
2
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and December
31, 2008 (Revised)
|
2
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited)
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Revised)
|
3
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited) for the Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 (Revised)
|
5
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Revised)
|
6
|
|||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
20
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
30
|
||
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
30
|
||
PART
II—OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
31
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
31
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
31
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
31
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
31
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
31
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
32
|
||
Signatures
|
33
|
|||
Exhibit
Index
|
34
|
i
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
(revised)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Real
estate assets, at cost:
|
||||||||
Property
|
$ | 190,757 | $ | 180,397 | ||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(30,411 | ) | (29,550 | ) | ||||
Total
real estate assets
|
160,346 | 150,847 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
14,782 | 12,989 | ||||||
Escrows
and acquisition deposits
|
1,818 | 4,076 | ||||||
Accrued
rent and accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts
|
5,026 | 4,880 | ||||||
Unamortized
lease commissions and loan costs
|
4,400 | 4,338 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
1,298 | 815 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 187,670 | $ | 177,945 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$ | 109,994 | $ | 100,003 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
5,010 | 7,422 | ||||||
Tenants’
security deposits
|
1,662 | 1,629 | ||||||
Dividends
and distributions payable
|
1,696 | 1,719 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
118,362 | 110,773 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies:
|
||||||||
Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
shares, $0.001 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
shares, $0.001 par value per share; 400,000,000 shares authorized;
10,337,307 and 9,707,307 issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively
|
10 | 10 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
69,372 | 69,188 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(24,436 | ) | (23,307 | ) | ||||
Total
Whitestone REIT shareholders’ equity
|
44,946 | 45,891 | ||||||
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiary
|
24,362 | 21,281 | ||||||
Total
equity
|
69,308 | 67,172 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$ | 187,670 | $ | 177,945 |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
Three
Months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
(revised)
|
||||||||
Property
Revenues
|
||||||||
Rental
revenues
|
$ | 6,505 | $ | 6,228 | ||||
Tenants’
reimbursements and other property revenues
|
1,539 | 1,529 | ||||||
Total
property revenues
|
8,044 | 7,757 | ||||||
Property
expenses
|
||||||||
Property
operation and maintenance
|
2,378 | 2,129 | ||||||
Real
estate taxes
|
1,049 | 1,008 | ||||||
Total
property expenses
|
3,427 | 3,137 | ||||||
Other
expenses (income)
|
||||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,429 | 1,963 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,708 | 1,556 | ||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,428 | 1,402 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
(11 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||
Total
other expenses
|
4,554 | 4,836 | ||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before loss on disposal of assets and
income taxes
|
63 | (216 | ) | |||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(54 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
(41 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(32 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
— | 190 | ||||||
Net
loss
|
(32 | ) | (111 | ) | ||||
Less:
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(11 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Net
loss attributable to Whitestone REIT
|
$ | (21 | ) | $ | (69 | ) |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
Three
Months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
(revised)
|
||||||||
Earnings
per share - basic
|
||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations attributable to Whitestone REIT excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||
Income
from discontinued operations attributable to Whitestone
REIT
|
— | 0.02 | ||||||
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to
unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||
Earnings
per share - diluted
|
||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations attributable to Whitestone REIT excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||
Income
from discontinued operations attributable to Whitestone
REIT
|
— | 0.02 | ||||||
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to
unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
9,707 | 10,001 | ||||||
Diluted
|
9,707 | 10,001 | ||||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$ | 0.1125 | $ | 0.1500 | ||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (32 | ) | $ | (111 | ) | ||
Other
comprehensive loss
|
||||||||
Unrealized
loss on cash flow hedging activities
|
— | (593 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
(32 | ) | (704 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive
loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(11 | ) | (265 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive
loss attributable to Whitestone REIT
|
$ | (21 | ) | $ | (439 | ) |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in
thousands)
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Shares
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Noncontrolling
Interests
|
Total
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Units
|
Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008 (revised)
|
9,707 | $ | 10 | $ | 69,188 | $ | (23,307 | ) | $ | — | $ | 45,891 | 4,740 | $ | 21,281 | $ | 67,172 | |||||||||||||||||||
OP
units issued at $5.15 per unit in connection with property
acquisition
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 704 | 3,625 | 3,625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
630 | — | 184 | — | — | 184 | — | — | 184 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
and distributions
|
— | — | — | (1,108 | ) | — | (1,108 | ) | — | (533 | ) | (1,641 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | — | (21 | ) | — | (21 | ) | — | (11 | ) | (32 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2009 (unaudited)
|
10,337 | $ | 10 | $ | 69,372 | $ | (24,436 | ) | $ | — | $ | 44,946 | 5,444 | $ | 24,362 | $ | 69,308 |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three
Months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
(revised)
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss from continuing operations
|
$ | (21 | ) | $ | (259 | ) | ||
Net
income from discontinued operations
|
— | 190 | ||||||
Net
loss
|
(21 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,708 | 1,556 | ||||||
Net
loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(11 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Loss
on sale or disposal of assets
|
41 | 31 | ||||||
Bad
debt expense
|
218 | 191 | ||||||
Share-based
compensation
|
241 | — | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Escrows
and acquisition deposits
|
2,404 | 334 | ||||||
Accrued
rent and accounts receivable
|
(364 | ) | 221 | |||||
Unamortized
lease commissions and loan costs
|
(88 | ) | (267 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(55 | ) | (415 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(2,838 | ) | (2,479 | ) | ||||
Tenants’
security deposits
|
33 | 35 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
1,268 | (1,094 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities of discontinued
operations
|
— | 140 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Acquisitions
of real estate
|
(5,619 | ) | — | |||||
Additions
to real estate
|
(1,249 | ) | (1,122 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(6,868 | ) | (1,122 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities of discontinued
operations
|
— | (8 | ) | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Dividends
paid on common shares
|
(1,156 | ) | (1,500 | ) | ||||
Distributions
paid to OP unit holders
|
(531 | ) | (871 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
9,791 | 11,404 | ||||||
Repayments
of notes payable
|
(423 | ) | (6,333 | ) | ||||
Payments
of loan origination costs
|
(288 | ) | (916 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
7,393 | 1,784 | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
1,793 | (300 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
12,989 | 10,811 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 14,782 | $ | 10,511 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 1,200 | $ | 1,445 | ||||
Non
cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Disposal
of fully depreciated real estate
|
$ | 456 | $ | 571 | ||||
Financed
insurance premiums
|
$ | 579 | $ | 391 | ||||
Acquisition
of real estate asset in exchange for OP Units
|
$ | 3,625 | $ | — |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The
use of the words “we,” “us,” “our” or “Whitestone” refers to Whitestone REIT and
our consolidated subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise
requires.
1.
Interim Financial Statements
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are
unaudited; however, amounts presented in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2008 are derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements at that date. The unaudited financial statements at March
31, 2009 have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial information on a basis consistent
with the annual audited consolidated financial statements and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q, except for the adoptions in the first quarter of 2009
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS No. 160”); Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position EITF No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities”
(“FSP EITF No. 03-6-1”); SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations”(“SFAS
No. 141(R)”), which is applied prospectively to business combinations with
acquisition dates on or after January 1, 2009; and SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“SFAS No. 157”), for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities not
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the condensed consolidated financial
statement on a recurring basis. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and notes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements.
The
impact of SFAS No. 160 is discussed in more detail in Note 2, Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies. The impact of FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, is discussed
in more detail in Note 8, Earnings Per Share.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all
adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position of Whitestone, and our subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2009 and the results of operations for the three month period ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the condensed consolidated statement of changes in
equity for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 and cash flows for the
three month period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. All of these adjustments are
of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim period
are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year. The
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and the notes which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Business.
Whitestone was formed as a real estate investment trust, pursuant to the Texas
Real Estate Investment Trust Act on August 20, 1998. In July 2004, Whitestone
changed its state of organization from Texas to Maryland pursuant to a merger of
Whitestone directly with and into a Maryland real estate investment trust formed
for the sole purpose effectuating of the reorganization and the conversion of
each outstanding common share of beneficial interest of the Texas entity into
1.42857 common shares of beneficial interest of the Maryland entity (the “Common
Shares”). Whitestone serves as the general partner of Whitestone REIT Operating
Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), which was formed on December
31, 1998 as a Delaware limited partnership. Whitestone currently conducts
substantially all of its operations and activities through the Operating
Partnership. As the general partner of the Operating Partnership, Whitestone has
the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of the Operating
Partnership, subject to certain customary exceptions. As of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, we owned and operated 36 and 35 retail, warehouse and office
properties, respectively, in and around Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Chicago
and Phoenix.
7
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Consolidation. We are the sole general partner of the Operating
Partnership and possess full legal control and authority over the operations of
the Operating Partnership. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we owned
a majority of the partnership interests in the Operating Partnership.
Consequently, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Operating Partnership. All significant inter-company
balances have been eliminated. Noncontrolling interest in the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements represents the share of equity and
earnings of the Operating Partnership allocable to holders of partnership
interests other than us. Net income or loss is allocated to noncontrolling
interests based on the weighted-average percentage ownership of the Operating
Partnership during the year. Issuance of additional Common Shares and units of
limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership that are convertible
into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis (“OP Units”) changes the ownership
interests of both the noncontrolling interests and Whitestone.
Basis
of Accounting. Our financial records are maintained on the accrual basis
of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are
recorded when incurred.
Use
of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Significant estimates that we use include the
estimated useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets and costs, the
estimated allowance for doubtful accounts, estimates supporting our impairment
analysis for the carrying values of our real estate assets and the estimated
fair value of interest rate swaps. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications.
We have reclassified certain prior fiscal year amounts in the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in order to be
consistent with the current fiscal year presentation, including changes
resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009, as discussed
later in this Note 2. Other than the changes resulting from the implementation
of SFAS No. 160, these reclassifications had no effect on net loss or
equity.
Share-Based
Compensation. From time to time the Company awards nonvested Common
Shares or Common Share Units to trustees, executive officers and employees which
may be converted into Common Shares under the 2008 Long-Term Equity Incentive
Ownership Plan (the “Plan”). The vast majority of the awarded shares and units
vest when certain performance conditions are met. We recognize compensation
expense when achievement of the performance conditions is probable using the
fair market value of the shares as of the grant date, in accordance with SFAS
No. 123R, “Share-Based
Payments,” as revised (“SFAS No. 123R”). For the three months ended March
31, 2009, the Company recognized $0.2 million in share-based compensation
expense. No share-based compensation expense was recognized prior to 2009 as no
awards had been granted.
Noncontrolling
Interests. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 which is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We adopted
SFAS No. 160 effective January, 2009. Noncontrolling interests is the portion of
equity in a subsidiary not attributable to a parent. The ownership interests not
held by the parent are considered noncontrolling interests. Accordingly, we have
reported noncontrolling interests in equity on the condensed consolidated
balance sheets but separate from Whitestone’s equity as prescribed by SFAS No.
160. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amount, including both the amount
attributable to Whitestone and noncontrolling interests. Consolidated statements
of changes in equity are included for both quarterly and annual financial
statements, including beginning balances, activity for the period and ending
balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total
equity.
See
Whitestone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for
further discussion on significant accounting policies.
8
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No.
157. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement does not
require new fair value measurements but is applied to the extent other
accounting pronouncements require or permit fair value measurements. The
statement emphasizes fair value as a market-based measurement which should be
determined based upon assumptions market participants would use in pricing an
asset or a liability. In February 2008, FASB issued FSP 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
157” (“FSP 157-2”) which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Adoption of SFAS No.
157 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the
Company.
In
February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No.
115” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective
of the statement is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with
the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within
those fiscal years. We adopted SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2008 and
elected not to measure any of our current eligible financial assets or
liabilities at fair value.
In
December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R) which replaces SFAS No.
141, “Business
Combinations” which, among other
things, establishes principles and requirements for how an acquiring entity
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed (including intangibles) and any noncontrolling
interests in the acquired entity. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December
15, 2008. Adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009 impacts our accounting
for acquisitions and related transaction costs.
In
December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160. SFAS No. 160 amends ARB
51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It also
amends certain of ARB 51’s consolidation procedures for consistency with the
requirements of SFAS No. 141(R). SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. We adopted SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009.
In
March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements
for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to
provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. Currently, we do not have any derivative instrument or
hedging activities.
In
June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities”
(“FSP EITF No. 03-6-1”). FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 affects entities which accrue
non-returnable cash dividends on share-based payment awards during the awards’
service period. FASB concluded unvested share-based payment awards which are
entitled to cash dividends, whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities
any time the common shareholders receive dividends. Because the awards are
considered participating securities, the issuing entity is required to apply the
two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share, as
prescribed by EITF No. 03-6, “Participating Securities and the
Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128.”. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption
is not permitted. Adoption on January 1, 2009 impacts our earnings per share
(“EPS”) calculation, as specified in Note 8.
9
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
3.
Derivatives and Hedging
On
September 28, 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction which we
have designated as a cash flow hedge. The effective date of the swap transaction
was October 1, 2007, had a total notional amount of $70 million, and fixed the
swap rate at 4.77% plus the LIBOR margin through October 1, 2008. The purpose of
this swap was to mitigate the risk of future fluctuations in interest rates on
our variable rate debt. We determined that this swap was highly effective in
offsetting future variable interest cash flows on variable rate debt. This
interest rate swap matured on October 1, 2008 and was not renewed by
us.
Whitestone
elected to implement SFAS No. 157 with the one-year deferral permitted by FASB
Staff Position No. FAS 157-2.
FSP No. 157-2,
which was issued February 2008, defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
one year for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured
at fair value, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis.
SFAS
No. 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair
value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and liabilities
measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the
observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are
defined as follows:
●
|
Level
1 – Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities.
|
|
●
|
Level
2 – Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as
quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are
observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term
of the asset or liability.
|
|
●
|
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and
which the Company makes its own assumptions about how market participants
would price the assets and
liabilities.
|
All
of our derivative instruments which fall under the fair value requirements fall
under the Level 2 criteria. Interest rate swaps are valued by a third-party
consultant using modeling techniques that include market inputs such as interest
rate yield curves.
4. Real Estate
As
of March 31, 2009, we owned 36 commercial properties in the Houston, Dallas, San
Antonio, Phoenix and Chicago areas comprising approximately 3.0 million square
feet of total area.
10
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
5.
Accrued Rent and Accounts Receivable, net
Accrued
rent and accounts receivable, net, consists of amounts accrued, billed and due
from tenants, amounts due from insurance claims, allowance for doubtful accounts
and other receivables as follows (in thousands):
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
Tenant
receivables
|
$ | 2,852 | $ | 2,733 | ||||
Accrued
rent
|
3,711 | 3,644 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(1,542 | ) | (1,497 | ) | ||||
Other
receivables
|
5 | — | ||||||
Totals
|
$ | 5,026 | $ | 4,880 |
6.
Unamortized Leasing Commissions and Loan Costs
Costs
which have been deferred consist of the following (in thousands):
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
Leasing
commissions
|
$ | 4,400 | $ | 4,412 | ||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
2,212 | 1,921 | ||||||
Total
cost
|
6,612 | 6,333 | ||||||
Less:
accumulated amortization leasing commissions
|
(1,947 | ) | (1,842 | ) | ||||
Less:
accumulated amortization deferred financing costs
|
(265 | ) | (153 | ) | ||||
Total
cost, net of accumulated amortization
|
$ | 4,400 | $ | 4,338 |
11
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
7.
Debt
Mortgages
and other notes payable consist of the following (in thousands):
Description
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
Fixed
rate notes
|
|||||||||
$10.0
million 6.04% Note, due 2014
|
$ | 9,749 | $ | 9,782 | |||||
$11.2
million 6.52% Note, due 2015
|
11,139 | 11,159 | |||||||
$21.4
million 6.53% Note, due 2013
|
21,131 | 21,263 | |||||||
$24.5
million 6.56% Note, due 2013
|
24,500 | 24,500 | |||||||
$9.9
million 6.63% Note, due 2014
|
9,941 | — | |||||||
$0.5
million 5.05% Note, due 2009
|
448 | 40 | |||||||
Floating
rate notes
|
|||||||||
$6.4
million LIBOR + 2.00% Note, due 2009
|
6,400 | 6,400 | |||||||
$26.9
million LIBOR + 2.60% Note, due 2013
|
26,686 | 26,859 | |||||||
$ | 109,994 | $ | 100,003 |
Fixed
Rate Notes. On February 3, 2009, Whitestone, operating through its
subsidiary, Whitestone Centers LLC, executed four promissory notes (the “Sun
Life Promissory Notes II”), totaling $9.9 million payable to Sun Life Assurance
Company of Canada with an applicable interest rate of 6.63% per annum and a
maturity date of March 1, 2014. The Sun Life Promissory Notes II are
non-recourse loans secured by the Whitestone Centers LLC’s properties and a
limited guarantee by Whitestone.
Floating
Rate Notes. On January 25, 2008, we entered into a $6.4 million term loan
agreement with KeyBank. The term loan is secured by a pledge of the partnership
interests in WROP III, and Whitestone Pima Norte LLC (“WPN”), a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Operating Partnership that was formed to hold title to our
Pima Norte property purchased in October 2007. At March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, WROP III owned 13 and 17 properties, respectively, and WPN owned 1
property.
Outstanding
amounts under the note accrue interest computed at the LIBOR rate on the basis
of a 360-day year, plus 2%. Only interest is payable monthly under the loan with
the total amount of principal coming due at maturity in July 2009. The covenants
of this agreement mirror those in our $75 million revolving credit agreement
with KeyBank which was paid in full on October 3, 2008. The covenants are as
follows:
● We
will not permit our total indebtedness to exceed 60% of the fair market value of
our real estate assets at the end of any quarter. “Total indebtedness” is
defined as all of our liabilities, including the term loan and all other secured
and unsecured debt, including letters of credit and guarantees. “Fair market
value of real estate assets” is defined as aggregate net operating income for
the preceding four quarters, less a $0.15 per square foot per annum capital
expenditure reserve, divided by a 9.25% capitalization rate.
● The
ratio of consolidated rolling four-quarter earnings before interest, income tax,
depreciation and amortization expenses to total interest expense, including
capitalized interest, shall not be less than 2.0 to 1.0.
● The
ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and
amortization expenses to total interest expense, including capitalized interest,
principal amortization, capital expenditures and preferred stock dividends shall
not be less than 1.5 to 1.0. Capital expenditures shall be deemed to be $0.15
per square foot per annum.
12
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
● The
ratio of secured debt to fair market value of real estate assets shall not be
greater than 40%.
● We
must maintain a consolidated tangible net worth of not less than $30 million
plus 75% of the value of stock and OP units issued in conjunction with an
offering or with the acquisition of an asset or stock. Consolidated tangible net
worth is defined as shareholders’ equity less intangible assets.
In
order to pay off our $75 million revolving credit facility in 2008, we entered
into non-recourse mortgages secured by various properties and a limited
guarantee by us. As a result of these secured mortgages, we are not in
compliance with our secured debt to fair market value ratio and our total
indebtedness to fair market value ratio covenants of our $6.4 million term loan
with KeyBank as of March 31, 2009. As this non-compliance constitutes an event
of default, the lender has the right to accelerate payment. We are in
discussions with KeyBank regarding an extension of this loan, which matures in
July 2009, and have requested a waiver from KeyBank. As of the date of this
filing, we have not received the waiver. Should we not receive a waiver, we will
attempt to obtain other financing or pay off the loan from cash
reserves.
Our
loans are subject to customary financial covenants. As of March 31, 2009, we are
in compliance with all loan covenants other than the non compliance described in
the preceding paragraph.
Annual
maturities of notes payable as of March 31, 2009, are due as set forth below (in
thousands):
Year
|
Principal
|
|||
2009
|
$
|
8,256
|
||
2010
|
2,276
|
|||
2011
|
2,402
|
|||
2012
|
2,534
|
|||
2013
|
66,457
|
|||
2014
and thereafter
|
28,069
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
109,994
|
8.
Earnings Per Share
Basic
earnings per share for Whitestone’s common shareholders is calculated by
dividing loss from continuing operations excluding amounts attributable to
unvested restricted shares, income from discontinued operations, and the net
loss attributable to non-controlling interests by Whitestone’s weighted-average
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is
computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common shareholders excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares, income from discontinued
operations, and the net loss attributable to non-controlling interests by the
weighted-average number of common shares including any unvested restricted
shares.
On
January 1, 2009, Whitestone adopted FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating
Securities,” (“FSP EITF No. 03-6-1”), which addresses whether share-based
payment transaction instruments are considered participating securities prior to
vesting, and in which all unvested stock awards which contain non-forfeitable
rights to dividends, whether paid or unpaid, are to be included in the number of
shares outstanding in Whitestone’s basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)
calculations.
13
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
Certain
of Whitestone’s performance restricted common shares are considered
participating securities which require the use of the two-class method for the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share. For the quarter ended March
31, 2009, basic EPS was not impacted by the two-class method because the
Company’s participating securities are not obligated to participate in net
operating losses, and diluted EPS was not impacted because the inclusion of
these securities would have had an anti-dilutive effect on diluted EPS. During
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, 5,443,797 and 5,808,337 OP Units
and 175,020 and 0 restricted common shares, respectively, were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be
anti-dilutive.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2009, distributions of $64,000 were made to the
holders of certain restricted share units, $57,000 of which was charged against
earnings. No distributions were made on the performance restricted shares prior
to 2009. See Note 14 for information related to restricted shares under the
incentive share plan.
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
$ | (32 | ) | $ | (301 | ) | ||
Less:
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
11 | 42 | ||||||
Dividends
paid on unvested restricted shares
|
(7 | ) | — | |||||
Undistributed
earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares
|
— | — | ||||||
Loss
from continuing operations attributable to Whitestone REIT excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares
|
(28 | ) | (259 | ) | ||||
Income
from discontinued operations attributable to Whitestone
REIT
|
— | 190 | ||||||
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to
unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (28 | ) | $ | (69 | ) | ||
Denominator
|
||||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares - basic
|
9,707 | 10,001 | ||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||
Unvested
restricted shares
|
— | — | ||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares - dilutive
|
9,707 | 10,001 | ||||||
Basic
earnings per common share:
|
||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations attributable to Whitestone REIT excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||
Income
from discontinued operations attributable to Whitestone
REIT
|
— | 0.02 | ||||||
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to
unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||
Diluted
earnings per common share:
|
||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations attributable to Whitestone REIT excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||
Income
from discontinued operations attributable to Whitestone
REIT
|
— | 0.02 | ||||||
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to
unvested restricted shares
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) |
9.
Income Taxes
Federal
income taxes are not assessed against us because we intend to and believe we
qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Our shareholders include their
proportionate taxable income in their individual tax returns. As a REIT, we must
distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders and
meet certain income sources and investment restriction requirements. In
addition, REITs are subject to a number of organizational and operational
requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be
subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax)
on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.
14
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
Taxable
income differs from net income for financial reporting purposes principally due
to differences in the timing of recognition of interest, real estate taxes,
depreciation, share-based compensation and rental revenue.
In
May 2006, the State of Texas adopted the Texas Margin Tax effective with
franchise tax reports filed on or after January 1, 2008. The Texas Margin Tax is
computed by applying the applicable tax rate (1% for us) to the profit margin,
which generally will be determined for us as total revenue less a 30% standard
deduction. Although House Bill 3 states that the Texas Margin Tax is not an
income tax, SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”
(“SFAS No. 109”) applies to the Texas Margin Tax. We have recorded a margin tax
provision of approximately $54,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008.
10.
Equity
Dividends
and distributions. The following tables summarize the cash
dividends/distributions paid to holders of Common Shares and holders of OP Units
for the four quarters of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
Whitestone
Shareholders
|
||||||||
Dividend
per
Common Share
|
Quarter
Dividend
Paid
|
Total
Amount
Paid
(in thousands)
|
||||||
$
|
0.1500
|
Qtr.
ended 03/31/08
|
$
|
1,500
|
||||
0.1500
|
Qtr.
ended 06/30/08
|
1,529
|
||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr.
ended 09/30/08
|
1,456
|
||||||
0.1125
|
Qtr.
ended 12/31/08
|
1,093
|
||||||
0.1125
|
Qtr.
ended 03/31/09
|
1,156
|
OP
Unit Holders Including Noncontrolling Unit Holders
|
||||||||
Distribution
per
OP Unit
|
Quarter
Distribution
Paid
|
Total
Amount
Paid
(in thousands)
|
||||||
$
|
0.1500
|
Qtr.
ended 03/31/08
|
$
|
2,317
|
||||
0.1500
|
Qtr.
ended 06/30/08
|
2,423
|
||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr.
ended 09/30/08
|
2,113
|
||||||
0.1125
|
Qtr.
ended 12/31/08
|
1,585
|
||||||
0.1125
|
Qtr.
ended 03/31/09
|
1,687
|
15
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
11.
Commitments and Contingencies
We
are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary
course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. While the
resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management
believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Hurricane Ike. Our 31
properties in Houston had minor to moderate harm, ranging from broken signage to
uprooted landscaping; other properties had more significant issues, such as
damaged roofing and exterior siding. We maintain casualty and business
interruption insurance at levels that we believe are adequate. The detailed
analysis of the total cost of Hurricane Ike, after the insurance deductible, to
be borne by us is still being conducted.
12.
Property Dispositions
On
May 30, 2008, as part of our settlement with Hartman Management L.P. and Allen
R. Hartman (“Hartman”), we exchanged two retail properties, Garden Oaks, a
95,046 square foot retail property located in Houston, Texas and Northeast
Square, a 40,525 square foot retail property located in Houston, Texas, for
$11.4 million. The $11.4 million purchase price was paid by Hartman in the form
of 293,961.54 Common Shares and 1,068,451.271 OP Units.
The
following is a summary of income (loss) from discontinued operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
Three
Months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Property
Revenues
|
||||||||
Rental
revenues
|
$ | — | $ | 275 | ||||
Other
revenues
|
— | 93 | ||||||
Total
property revenues
|
— | 368 | ||||||
Property
Expenses
|
||||||||
Property
opertation and maintenance
|
— | 61 | ||||||
Real
estate taxes
|
— | 46 | ||||||
Total
property expenses
|
— | 107 | ||||||
Other
expense
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
— | 67 | ||||||
Total
other expense
|
— | 67 | ||||||
Income
before loss on disposal of assets and income taxes
|
— | 194 | ||||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
— | (1 | ) | |||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
— | (3 | ) | |||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
$ | — | $ | 190 |
13.
Acquisitions
On
January 16, 2009, we acquired a 41,396 square foot garden style mixed use
property in Buffalo Grove, Illinois for approximately $9.4 million, including
cash of $5.5 million, issuance of 703,912 OP Units worth $3.6 million and credit
for net prorations of $0.3 million. The property, Spoerlein Commons, is a two
story complex of retail, medical and professional office tenants. James C.
Mastandrea, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, was the
controlling limited partner of Midwest Development Venture IV, the seller of
Spoerlein Commons, and had an ownership interest in the property and was
entitled to a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the property to the
Operating Partnership. Because of Mr. Mastandrea’s relationship with the seller,
a special committee of the independent members of the Board of Trustees,
including Donald F. Keating, Jack L. Mahaffey, and Chris A. Minton, negotiated
the terms of the transaction, which included the use of an independent appraiser
to value the property. This purchase was accounted for using the acquisition
method as prescribed under SFAS No. 141(R). The assets acquired and liabilities
accrued in this transaction were recorded at their estimated fair value at the
time of purchase.
16
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
14.
Incentive Share Plan
On
July 29, 2008, our shareholders approved the 2008 Long-Term Equity Incentive
Ownership Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides that awards may be made with
respect to Common Shares or OP Units, which may be converted into Common Shares
of Whitestone. The Plan authorizes awards in respect of an aggregate of
2,063,885 Common Shares. The maximum aggregate number of Common Shares that may
be issued under the Plan will be increased upon each issuance of Common Shares
by Whitestone (including issuances pursuant to the Plan) so that at any time the
maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan shall equal 12.5% of
the aggregate number of Common Shares of Whitestone and OP Units issued and
outstanding (other than treasury shares and/or units issued to or held by
Whitestone).
The
Compensation Committee of Whitestone’s Board of Trustees administers the Plan,
except with respect to awards to non-employee trustees, for which the Plan is
administered by Whitestone’s Board of Trustees. The Committee is authorized to
grant stock options, including both incentive stock options and non-qualified
stock options, as well as stock appreciation rights, either with or without a
related option. The Committee is also authorized to grant restricted common
shares, restricted common share units, performance awards and other share-based
awards. No single participant may receive options or stock appreciation rights
in any calendar year that, taken together, relate to more than 500,000 common
shares, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
On
January 6, 2009, the Compensation Committee, pursuant to the Plan, granted to
certain of its officers restricted common share awards (the “Restricted Shares”)
and restricted common share unit awards (the “Restricted Units”) subject to
certain restrictions. The Restricted Shares and Restricted Units will vest based
on certain performance goals (as specified in the award agreement). The grantee
is the record owner of the Restricted Shares and has all rights of a shareholder
with respect to the Restricted Shares, including the right to vote the
Restricted Shares and to receive dividends and distributions with respect to the
Restricted Shares. The grantee has no rights of a shareholder with respect to
the Restricted Units, including no right to vote the Restricted Units and no
right to receive current dividends and distributions with respect to the
Restricted Units until the units are fully vested and convertible to Common
Shares of Whitestone.
17
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
A
summary of the stock-based incentive plan activity as of and for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 is as follows:
Shares
|
Weight-Average
Grant
Date
Fair Value
|
|||||||
Non-vested
at January 1, 2009
|
— | $ | — | |||||
Granted
|
1,784,187 | 4.13 | ||||||
Vested
|
— | — | ||||||
Forfeited
|
— | — | ||||||
Non-vested
at March 31, 2009
|
1,784,187 | $ | 4.13 |
Total
compensation recognized in earnings for share-based payments for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, was $0.2 and $0.0 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2009, there was $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to outstanding nonvested shares issued under the Plan, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of nine months. The
fair value of the shares granted during the three months ended March 31, 2009
was determined based on observable market transactions occurring near the date
of the grants.
15.
Grants to Trustees
On
March 25, 2009, each of our five independent trustees was granted 5,000
restricted common shares which vest in equal installments in 2010, 2011, and
2012. These shares were granted pursuant to individual grant agreements and were
not pursuant to our 2008 Long-Term Equity Incentive Ownership Plan. The 25,000
shares had a weighted average grant date fair value of $4.94 per share,
resulting in total unrecognized compensation cost of $0.1 million, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately three
years. The fair value of the shares granted during the three months ended March
31, 2009 was determined based on observable market transactions occurring near
the date of the grants.
16.
Segment Information
Historically,
our management has not differentiated results of operations by property type or
location and therefore does not present segment information.
17.
Related Party Transactions
Spoerlein
Commons Acquisition
On
January 16, 2009, Whitestone, operating through the Operating Partnership,
acquired Spoerlein Commons, a mixed use-garden style complex of retail, medical,
and professional office tenants located in Buffalo Grove, Illinois. The
Operating Partnership acquired Spoerlein Commons pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the purchase, sale and contribution agreement dated December 18,
2008 (the “Agreement”) between the Operating Partnership and Bank One, Chicago,
NA, as trustee under the Trust Agreement dated January 29, 1986 and known as
Trust Number TWB-0454 (“Seller”). Midwest Development Venture IV, an Illinois
limited partnership (“Midwest”), is the sole beneficiary of the Seller under the
Trust Agreement.
Spoerlein
Commons represents an acquisition for Whitestone, and a substantial equity
investment on behalf of the Seller. In exchange for Spoerlein Commons, the
Operating Partnership paid the Seller $5,500,000, received credit for net
prorations of $275,854 and issued 703,912 OP Units, valued at $5.15 per Unit,
for a total purchase price of $9,401,000.
18
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
Midwest,
the sole beneficiary of the Seller, is entitled to all earnings and proceeds
from the sale of Spoerlein Commons. James C. Mastandrea, our Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer, is the controlling limited partner in Midwest and
as such, had an ownership interest in Spoerlein Commons and is entitled to a
portion of the proceeds from the sale of Spoerlein Commons to the Operating
Partnership. Because of Mr. Mastandrea’s relationship with the Seller, a special
committee of the independent members of the Board of Trustees including Donald
F. Keating, Jack L. Mahaffey, and Chris A. Minton determined the terms of the
transaction, which included the use of an independent appraiser to value
Spoerlein Commons.
No
brokerage commission was paid by Whitestone for this acquisition, and in
relation to Mr. Mastandrea’s investment, there was no front end load, meaning
that 100% of the amount paid is working for the benefit of Whitestone’s
shareholders.
In
connection with the closing of Spoerlein Commons and the investment on behalf of
the Seller, the Operating Partnership issued 703,912 OP Units to Midwest for its
contribution of Spoerlein Commons to the Operating Partnership. The OP Units
were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section
4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The issuance was not effected
using any form of general advertising or general solicitation and the issuance
was made to a qualified investor.
The
OP Units are convertible on a one-for-one basis into Common Shares at any time
after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the terms of the Operating Partnership’s
Limited Partnership Agreement, as amended (the “Limited Partnership Agreement”).
The Seller will not be entitled to any dividends or distributions with respect
to the OP Units prior to June 30, 2009.
19
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
You
should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of
operations in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements
and the notes thereto included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the
“Report”). For more detailed information regarding the basis of presentation for
the following information, you should read the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this Report.
This
Report contains forward-looking statements, including discussion and analysis of
our financial condition, anticipated capital expenditures required to complete
projects, amounts of anticipated cash distributions to our shareholders in the
future and other matters. These forward-looking statements are not historical
facts but are the intent, belief or current expectations of our management based
on its knowledge and understanding of our business and industry. Forward-looking
statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,”
“should,” “potential,” “predicts,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,”
“believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” or the negative of such terms and variations of
these words and similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of
future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors,
some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking
statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect
or false. You are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this
Report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking
statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated
events or changes to future operating results. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements made in this
Report include:
●
|
the
imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year or foregone opportunity to ensure REIT status;
|
|
●
|
uncertainties
related to the national economy, the real estate industry in general and
in our specific markets;
|
|
●
|
legislative
or regulatory changes, including changes to laws governing REIT;
|
|
●
|
construction
costs that may exceed estimates or construction delays;
|
|
●
|
increases
in interest rates;
|
|
●
|
availability
of credit equity or significant disruption in the credit or equity
markets;
|
|
●
|
litigation
risks;
|
|
●
|
lease-up
risks;
|
|
●
|
inability
to obtain new tenants upon the expiration of existing
leases;
|
|
●
|
inability
to generate sufficient cash flows due to market conditions, competition,
uninsured losses, changes in tax or other applicable laws;
and
|
|
●
|
the
potential need to fund tenant improvements or other capital expenditures
out of operating cash
flow.
|
20
The
forward-looking statements should be read in light of these factors and the
factors identified in the “Risk Factors” sections of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Executive
Overview
We
are a self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”) engaged in owning
and operating income-producing real properties. Our investments include retail,
office and warehouse properties located in the Houston, Dallas, San Antonio,
Chicago and Phoenix metropolitan areas. Whitestone serves as the general partner
of Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership,” or
“WROP” or “OP”), which was formed on December 31, 1998 as a Delaware limited
partnership. Whitestone currently conducts substantially all of its operations
and activities through the Operating Partnership. As the general partner of the
Operating Partnership, Whitestone has the exclusive power to manage and conduct
the business of the Operating Partnership, subject to certain customary
exceptions. As of March 31, 2009, we owned and operated 36 commercial properties
consisting of:
●
|
Seventeen
retail properties containing approximately 1.1 million square feet of
leasable space and having a total carrying amount (net of accumulated
depreciation) of $61.3 million.
|
|
●
|
Eight
office properties containing approximately 0.7 million square feet of
leasable space and having a total carrying amount (net of accumulated
depreciation) of $55.9 million.
|
|
●
|
Eleven
office/warehouse properties containing approximately 1.2 million square
feet of leasable space and having a total carrying amount (net of
accumulated depreciation) of $43.2
million.
|
Our
primary source of income and cash is rents associated with commercial leases.
Our business objective is to increase shareholder value by employing a
value-added investment strategy. This strategy is focused on owning and
renovating commercial real estate assets in markets with positive demographic
trends, achieving diversification by property type and location, and acquiring
properties within our targeted returns.
As
of March 31, 2009, we had 702 total tenants. We have a diversified tenant base
with our largest tenant comprising only 2.7% of our total revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. Lease terms for our properties range from less than
one year for smaller tenants to over 15 years for larger tenants. Our leases
generally include minimum monthly lease payments and tenant reimbursements for
payment of taxes, insurance and maintenance.
We
employ 55 full-time employees as of March 31, 2009. As a self-managed REIT, we
bear our own expenses of operations, including the salaries, benefits and other
compensation of our employees, office expenses, legal, accounting and investor
relations expenses and other overhead.
We
believe that one of the key measures of our performance is property occupancy.
Occupancy for the total portfolio was 82% at March 31, 2009, compared to 86% at
March 31, 2008. We executed 63 new and renewal leases during the three months
ended March 31, 2009, totaling approximately 180,000 square feet and $8.5
million in total lease value.
21
In
the fourth quarter of 2006, our Board approved our five-year business plan. The
key elements of the plan are as follows:
●
|
Maximize
value in current properties through operational focus and
redevelopment;
|
|
●
|
Grow
through strategic acquisitions of commercial properties in high potential
markets, including properties outside of Texas;
|
|
●
|
Dispose
of non-core properties and reinvest the capital in redevelopment of
existing properties or acquisition of core properties in high potential
markets;
|
|
●
|
Raise
capital using a combination of the private and public equity and debt
markets, as well as joint ventures; and
|
|
●
|
Bring
liquidity to our stock by listing on a national stock
exchange.
|
A
summary of our progress on the execution of this five year plan is described in
the following sections on redevelopment, acquisitions and
dispositions.
Redevelopment
We
completed the redevelopment of the Westchase Plaza Retail and Office Center
located in Houston, Texas during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
total redevelopment of this center cost approximately $1.7 million, and it added
approximately 6,600 square feet of leasable office space.
Acquisitions
On
January 16, 2009, we acquired a 41,396 square foot garden style mixed use
property in Buffalo Grove, Illinois for approximately $9.4 million. The
property, Spoerlein Commons, is a two story complex of retail, medical and
professional office tenants. James C. Mastandrea, our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, was the controlling limited partner of Midwest
Development Venture IV, the seller of Spoerlein Commons, and had an ownership
interest in the property and was entitled to a portion of the proceeds from the
sale of the property to the Operating Partnership. Because of Mr. Mastandrea’s
relationship with the seller, a special committee of the independent members of
the Board of Trustees, including Donald F. Keating, Jack L. Mahaffey, and Chris
A. Minton, negotiated the terms of the transaction, which included the use of an
independent appraiser to value the property.
Dispositions
(discontinued operations)
On
May 30, 2008, as part of our settlement with Hartman Management L.P. and Allen
R. Hartman (“Hartman”), we exchanged two retail properties, Garden Oaks, a
95,046 square foot retail property located in Houston, Texas and Northeast
Square, a 40,525 square foot retail property located in Houston, Texas, for
$11.4 million. The $11.4 million purchase price was paid by Hartman in the form
of 293,961.54 Whitestone Common Shares (the “Common Shares”) and 1,068,451.271
units of ownership interest in Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, L.P (the
“OP Units”).
22
Critical Accounting
Policies
In
preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements, we have made
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
during the reported periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates. A
summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Form 10-K, as
amended, for the year ended December 31, 2008, under Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been no
significant changes to these policies during the first three months of 2009
except for the adoptions in the first quarter of 2009 of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS No. 160”); Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position EITF No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities”
(“FSP EITF No. 03-6-1”); SFAS 141(R), “Business Combinations”, which
is applied prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates on or
after January 1, 2009; and SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(SFAS No. 157), for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. For
disclosure regarding recent accounting pronouncements and the anticipated impact
they will have on our operations, please refer to Note 2 of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Results
of Operations
Comparison of the Three Month Periods
Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
The
following tables provide a general comparison of our results of operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except for
aggregate gross leasable area):
March
31, 2009
|
March
31, 2008
|
|||||||
Number
of properties owned and operated
|
36 | 37 | ||||||
Aggregate
gross leasable area (sq. ft.)
|
3,039,300 | 3,093,063 | ||||||
Ending
occupancy rate
|
82 | % | 86 | % | ||||
Total
property revenues
|
$ | 8,044 | $ | 7,757 | ||||
Total
property expenses
|
3,427 | 3,137 | ||||||
Total
other expenses
|
4,554 | 4,836 | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
54 | 54 | ||||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
41 | 31 | ||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(32 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
— | 190 | ||||||
Net
loss
|
(32 | ) | (111 | ) | ||||
Less:
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(11 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Net
loss attributable to Whitestone REIT
|
$ | (21 | ) | $ | (69 | ) | ||
Funds
from operations (1)
|
$ | 1,556 | $ | 1,372 | ||||
Dividends
and distributions paid on common shares and OP Units
|
1,687 | 2,371 | ||||||
Per
common share and OP unit
|
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Dividends
paid as a % of funds from operations
|
108 | % | 173 | % |
(1) For a
reconciliation of funds from operations to net income, see Funds From Operations
below.
23
Property
revenues. Substantially all of our revenue is derived from rents received
from the use of our properties. We had rental income and
tenant reimbursements of approximately $8.0 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as compared to $7.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008, an increase of $0.2 million, or 3%. The increase is primarily attributable
to increased rent per square foot, offset by decreased occupancy.
Property
expenses. Our total property
expenses were $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as
compared to $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase
of $0.3 million, or 10%. The primary components of operating expense are
detailed in the table below (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||
Real
estate taxes
|
$ | 1,049 | $ | 1,008 | |||||
Utilities
|
618 | 686 | |||||||
Contract
services
|
543 | 524 | |||||||
Repairs
and maintenance
|
263 | 291 | |||||||
Bad
debt
|
218 | 191 | |||||||
Repairs
related to Hurricane Ike
|
241 | — | |||||||
Labor
and other
|
495 | 437 | |||||||
Total
property expenses
|
$ | 3,427 | $ | 3,137 |
The
increase in property expenses is primarily attributed to ongoing repairs related
to Hurricane Ike. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we expensed
$241,000 in Hurricane Ike-related repairs, as compared to $0 during the three
months ended March 31, 2008. We maintain casualty and business interruption
insurance at levels that we believe are adequate. The detailed analysis of the
total cost of Hurricane Ike, after the insurance deductible, to be borne by us
is still being conducted.
Other
expense. Our other expenses were $4.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, as compared to $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 4%. The primary components of other
expense, net are detailed in the table below (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||
General
and administrative
|
$ | 1,429 | $ | 1,963 | |||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,708 | 1,556 | |||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,428 | 1,402 | |||||||
Interest
income
|
(11 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||
Total
other expenses
|
$ | 4,554 | $ | 4,836 |
General
and administrative. The decrease of $0.5 million in general and
administrative expense is primarily due to decreased legal fees as a result of
the settlement of the litigation with Mr. Hartman and Hartman Management, L.P.
in May 2008. Legal fees were $64,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
as compared to $663,000 for the same period in 2008. General and administrative
expense includes $241,000 and $0 in share-based compensation for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The share-based compensation
is tied to performance measures, and we expect quarterly share-based
compensation expense to remain at current levels for the rest of
2009.
24
Depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization increased $152,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2009, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. Two
acquired properties (Pima Norte and Spoerlein Commons) were added subsequent to
March 31, 2008 and have added additional depreciation expense.
Interest
expense, net. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009
was $1,428,000, an increase of $26,000 over the same period in 2008. An increase
in the average outstanding note payable balance of $19.0 million accounted for
approximately $310,000 in increased interest expense during 2009, while a lower
effective interest rate of 1.1% per annum (excluding amortized loan fees)
accounted for approximately $284,000 in decreased interest expense during 2009.
The decrease in interest income of approximately $74,000 is primarily due to
lower interest rates of return on our deposits.
Discontinued
Operations. Discontinued operations are comprised of the two properties
known as Garden Oaks and Northeast Square. The two properties were transferred
to Mr. Hartman and Hartman Management, L.P. as part of a legal settlement on May
30, 2008. Below is a recap of income from discontinued operations (in
thousands):
Three
Months ended March 31,
|
|||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||
Property
Revenues
|
|||||||||
Rental
revenues
|
$ | — | $ | 275 | |||||
Other
revenues
|
— | 93 | |||||||
Total
property revenues
|
— | 368 | |||||||
Property
Expenses
|
|||||||||
Property
opertation and maintenance
|
— | 61 | |||||||
Real
estate taxes
|
— | 46 | |||||||
Total
property expenses
|
— | 107 | |||||||
Other
expense
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
— | 67 | |||||||
Total
other expense
|
— | 67 | |||||||
Income
before loss on disposal of assets and income taxes
|
— | 194 | |||||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
— | (1 | ) | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
— | (3 | ) | ||||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
$ | — | $ | 190 |
Funds
From Operations
The
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines funds
from operations (“FFO”) as net income (loss) available to common shareholders
computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”), excluding gains or losses from sales of operating real estate assets
and extraordinary items, plus depreciation and amortization of operating
properties, including our share of unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and
partnerships. We calculate FFO in a manner consistent with the NAREIT
definition.
Management
uses FFO as a supplemental measure to conduct and evaluate our business because
there are certain limitations associated with using GAAP net income by itself as
the primary measure of our operating performance. Historical cost accounting for
real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of
real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Because real estate values
instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, management
believes that the presentation of operating results for real estate companies
that use historical cost accounting is insufficient by itself. There can be no
assurance that FFO presented by us is comparable to similarly titled measures of
other REITs.
25
FFO
should not be considered as an alternative to net income or other measurements
under GAAP as an indicator of our operating performance or to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of liquidity. FFO does
not reflect working capital changes, cash expenditures for capital improvements
or principal payments on indebtedness.
Below
is the calculation of FFO and the reconciliation to net income (loss), which we
believe is the most comparable GAAP financial measure (in
thousands):
Reconciliation
of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to Whitestone REIT
|
$ | (21 | ) | $ | (69 | ) | ||
Depreciation
and amortization of real estate assets (1)
|
1,547 | 1,452 | ||||||
Loss
on sale of assets (1)
|
41 | 31 | ||||||
Net
loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(11 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
FFO
|
$ | 1,556 | $ | 1,372 |
(1)
Including amounts for discontinued
operations
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Overview
Our
primary liquidity demands are distributions to the holders of our Common Shares
and holders of OP Units, capital improvements and repairs and maintenance for
our properties, acquisition of additional properties, tenant improvements and
debt repayments.
Primary
sources of capital for funding our acquisitions and redevelopment programs are
cash flows generated from operating activities, issuances of notes payable,
sales of Common Shares, sales of OP units and sales of underperforming
properties.
Our
capital structure includes recourse and non-recourse secured debt that we
assumed or originated on certain properties. We may hedge the future cash flows
of certain debt transactions principally through interest rate swaps with major
financial institutions.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, our cash provided from operating
activities was $1.3 million and our total distributions were $1.7 million.
Therefore, we had distributions in excess of cash flow from operations of
approximately $0.4 million.
We
anticipate that cash flows from operating activities and our borrowing capacity
will provide adequate capital for our working capital requirements, anticipated
capital expenditures and scheduled debt payments during the next 12 months. We
also believe that cash flows from operating activities and our borrowing
capacity will allow us to make all distributions required for us to continue to
qualify to be taxed as a REIT.
26
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
We
had cash and cash equivalents of $14.8 million at March 31, 2009, as compared to
$13.0 million on December 31, 2008. The increase of $1.8 million was primarily
the result of the following:
Sources
of Cash
|
||
●
|
Proceeds
of $9.5 million from issuance of notes payable net of origination
costs.
|
|
●
|
Cash
provided from operations of $1.3 million.
|
|
Uses of Cash | ||
●
|
Payment
of dividends and distributions of $1.7 million to holders of Common Shares
and OP Units.
|
|
●
|
Payment
of loans of $0.4 million.
|
|
●
|
Additions
to real estate of $6.9
million.
|
We
place all cash in short-term, highly liquid investments that we believe provide
appropriate safety of principal.
Debt
|
Mortgages
and other notes payable consist of the following (in thousands):
Description
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
Fixed
rate notes
|
|||||||||
$10.0
million 6.04% Note, due 2014
|
$ | 9,749 | $ | 9,782 | |||||
$11.2
million 6.52% Note, due 2015
|
11,139 | 11,159 | |||||||
$21.4
million 6.53% Note, due 2013
|
21,131 | 21,263 | |||||||
$24.5
million 6.56% Note, due 2013
|
24,500 | 24,500 | |||||||
$9.9
million 6.63% Note, due 2014
|
9,941 | — | |||||||
$0.5
million 5.05% Note, due 2009
|
448 | 40 | |||||||
Floating
rate notes
|
|||||||||
$6.4
million LIBOR + 2.00% Note, due 2009
|
6,400 | 6,400 | |||||||
$26.9
million LIBOR + 2.60% Note, due 2013
|
26,686 | 26,859 | |||||||
$ | 109,994 | $ | 100,003 |
Fixed
Rate Notes. On February 3, 2009, Whitestone, operating through its
subsidiary, Whitestone Centers LLC, executed four promissory notes (the “Sun
Life Promissory Notes II”), totaling $9.9 million payable to Sun Life Assurance
Company of Canada with an applicable interest rate of 6.63% per annum and a
maturity date of March 1, 2014. The Sun Life Promissory Notes II are
non-recourse loans secured by the Whitestone Centers LLC’s properties and a
limited guarantee by Whitestone.
Floating
Rate Notes. On January 25, 2008, we entered into a $6.4 million term loan
agreement with KeyBank. The term loan is secured by a pledge of the partnership
interests in WROP III, and Whitestone Pima Norte LLC (“WPN”), a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Operating Partnership that was formed to hold title to our
Pima Norte property purchased in October 2007. At March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, WROP III owned 13 and 17 properties, respectively, and WPN owned 1
property.
27
Outstanding
amounts under the note accrue interest computed at LIBOR on the basis of a
360-day year, plus 2%. Only interest is payable monthly under the loan with the
total amount of principal coming due at maturity in July 2009. The covenants of
this agreement mirror those in our $75 million revolving credit agreement with
KeyBank which was paid in full on October 3, 2008. The covenants are as
follows:
● We will not permit our total indebtedness to exceed 60% of the fair market value of our real estate assets at the end of any quarter. “Total indebtedness” is defined as all of our liabilities, including the term loan and all other secured and unsecured debt, including letters of credit and guarantees. “Fair market value of real estate assets” is defined as aggregate net operating income for the preceding four quarters, less a $0.15 per square foot per annum capital expenditure reserve, divided by a 9.25% capitalization rate. | |
● The ratio of consolidated rolling four-quarter earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization expenses to total interest expense, including capitalized interest, shall not be less than 2.0 to 1.0. | |
● The ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization expenses to total interest expense, including capitalized interest, principal amortization, capital expenditures and preferred stock dividends shall not be less than 1.5 to 1.0. Capital expenditures shall be deemed to be $0.15 per square foot per annum. | |
● The ratio of secured debt to fair market value of real estate assets shall not be greater than 40%. | |
● We must maintain a consolidated tangible net worth of not less than $30 million plus 75% of the value of stock and OP units issued in conjunction with an offering or with the acquisition of an asset or stock. Consolidated tangible net worth is defined as shareholders’ equity less intangible assets. |
In
order to pay off our $75 million revolving credit facility in 2008, we entered
into non-recourse mortgages secured by various properties and a limited
guarantee by us. As a result of these secured mortgages, we are not in
compliance with our secured debt to fair market value ratio and our total
indebtedness to fair market value ratio covenants of our $6.4 million term loan
with KeyBank as of March 31, 2009. As this non-compliance constitutes an event
of default, the lender has the right to accelerate payment. We are in
discussions with KeyBank regarding an extension of this loan, which matures in
July 2009, and have requested a waiver from KeyBank. As of the date of this
filing, we have not received the waiver. Should we not receive a waiver, we will
attempt to obtain other financing or pay off the loan from cash
reserves.
Our
loans are subject to customary financial covenants. As of March 31, 2009, we are
in compliance with all loan covenants other than the non compliance described in
the preceeding paragraph.
28
Annual
maturities of notes payable as of March 31, 2009, are due as set forth below (in
thousands):
Year
|
Principal
|
|||
2009
|
$
|
8,256
|
||
2010
|
2,276
|
|||
2011
|
2,402
|
|||
2012
|
2,534
|
|||
2013
|
66,457
|
|||
2014
and thereafter
|
28,069
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
109,994
|
Capital
Expenditures
We
continually evaluate our properties’ performance and value. We may determine it
is in our shareholders’ best interest to invest capital in properties we believe
have potential for increasing value. We also may have unexpected capital
expenditures or improvements for our existing assets. Additionally, we intend to
invest in similar properties outside of Texas in cities with exceptional
demographics to diversify market risk, and we may incur significant capital
expenditures or make improvements in connection with any properties we may
acquire.
Distributions
The
following distributions for Common Shares and OP Units were paid or declared
payable during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the year ended December
31, 2008 (in thousands):
Period
|
2009
Status
|
2009
Amount
|
Per
Share
/OP
Unit
|
2008
Amount
|
Per
Share
/OP
Unit
|
||||||||||||||
January
-March
|
Paid
|
$ | 1,687 | $ | 0.1125 | $ | 2,371 | $ | 0.1500 | ||||||||||
April
- June
|
Payable
|
$ | 1,696 | $ | 0.1125 | $ | 2,507 | $ | 0.1500 | ||||||||||
July
- September
|
$ | 2,168 | $ | 0.1500 | |||||||||||||||
October
- December
|
$ | 1,626 | $ | 0.1125 |
Taxes
We
elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 1999.
As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on income that we
distribute to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular
corporate rates. We believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner
as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, and we intend to operate so as to remain
qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
Inflation
We
anticipate that our leases will continue to be triple-net leases or otherwise
provide that tenants pay for increases in operating expenses and will contain
provisions that we believe will mitigate the effect of inflation. In addition,
many of our leases are for terms of less than five years, which allows us to
adjust rental rates to reflect inflation and other changing market conditions
when the leases expire. Consequently, increases due to inflation, as well as ad
valorem tax rate increases, generally do not have a significant adverse effect
upon our operating results.
29
Environmental
Matters
Our
properties are subject to environmental laws and regulations adopted by various
governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which our operations are
conducted. From our inception, we have incurred no significant environmental
costs, accrued liabilities or expenditures to mitigate or eliminate future
environmental contamination.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our
future income, cash flows and fair value relevant to our financial instruments
depend upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk is the risk of loss
arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. The principal market
risk to which we are exposed is the risk related to interest rate fluctuations.
Based upon the nature of our operations, we are not subject to foreign exchange
or commodity risk. We will be exposed to changes in interest rates as a result
of our financial instruments consist of loans that have floating interest rates.
As of March 31, 2009, we had $33.1 million of loans with floating interest
rates. All of our financial instruments were entered into for other than trading
purposes. As of March 31, 2009, we did not have a fixed rate hedge in place,
leaving $33.1 million subject to interest rate fluctuations. The impact of a 1%
increase or decrease in interest rates on our debt would result in a decrease or
increase of net income of approximately $0.3 million, respectively.
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
management of Whitestone REIT, under the supervision and with the participation
of our principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures in ensuring that the
information required to be disclosed in our filings under Rule 13a-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such information is
accumulated and communicated to Whitestone REIT’s management as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on such evaluation,
our principal executive and financial officers have concluded that such
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2009 (the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, there has been no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
30
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
We
are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary
course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. While the
resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management
believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
There
have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk
Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item
5. Other Information
None.
31
Item
6. Exhibits
The
list of exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in response
to Item 601 of Regulation S-K is submitted on the Exhibit Index attached
hereto.
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Whitestone
REIT
|
||
Date:
May 15, 2009
|
/s/
James C. Mastandrea
|
|
James
C. Mastandrea
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
(Chief
Executive Officer)
|
||
Date:
May 15, 2009
|
/s/
David K. Holeman
|
|
David
K. Holeman
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||
(Chief
Financial and Chief Accounting Officer)
|
33
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|||
3.1
|
Articles
of Amendment and Restatement of Declaration of Trust of Whitestone REIT
(previously filed as and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 31,
2008)
|
|||
3.2
|
Articles
Supplementary (previously filed as and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3(i).1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
December 6, 2006)
|
|||
3.3
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
October 9, 2008)
|
|||
4.1
|
Specimen
certificate for common shares of beneficial interest, par value $.001
(previously filed as and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No.
333-111674, filed on December 31, 2003)
|
|||
10.1
|
+
|
Form
of Restricted Common Share Award Agreement (Performance Vested)
(previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 7,
2009)
|
||
10.2
|
+
|
Form
of Restricted Common Share Award Agreement (Time Vested) (previously filed
and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed January 7, 2009)
|
||
10.3
|
+
|
Form
of Restricted Unit Award Agreement (previously filed and incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed January 7, 2009)
|
||
10.4
|
Promissory
Note among Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
dated February 3, 2009 (previously filed and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
February 10, 2009)
|
|||
10.5
|
Promissory
Note among Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
dated February 3, 2009 (previously filed and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
February 10, 2009)
|
|||
10.6
|
Promissory
Note among Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
dated February 3, 2009 (previously filed and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
February 10, 2009)
|
|||
10.7
|
Promissory
Note among Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
dated February 3, 2009 (previously filed and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
February 10, 2009)
|
|||
10.8
|
*
|
Purchase,
Sale and Contribution Agreement between Whitestone REIT Operating
Partnership, L.P. and Bank One, Chicago, NA, as trustee for Midwest
Development Venture IV dated December 18,
2008
|
34
10.9
|
*+
|
Grant
Agreement for Restricted Shares between Whitestone REIT and Daryl J.
Carter
|
|
10.10
|
*+
|
Grant
Agreement for Restricted Shares between Whitestone REIT and Daniel G.
DeVos
|
|
10.11
|
*+
|
Grant
Agreement for Restricted Shares between Whitestone REIT and Donald F.
Keating
|
|
10.12
|
*+
|
Grant
Agreement for Restricted Shares between Whitestone REIT and Jack L.
Mahaffey
|
|
10.13
|
*+
|
Grant
Agreement for Restricted Shares between Whitestone REIT and Chris A.
Minton
|
|
31.1
|
*
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31.2
|
*
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
**
|
Certificate
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32.2
|
**
|
Certificate
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
* Filed
herewith.
**
Furnished herewith.
+ Denotes
management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
35