WILLIAMS SONOMA INC - Quarter Report: 2015 August (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended August 2, 2015.

or

For the transition period from                          to                         

Commission File Number: 001-14077

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 421-7900

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of August 30, 2015, 90,742,939 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 2, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

1

Table of Contents

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

Table of Contents

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE A. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

These financial statements include Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“we,” “us” or “our”). The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014, the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks then ended, and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the twenty-six weeks then ended, have been prepared by us, without audit. In our opinion, the financial statements include all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position at the balance sheet dates and the results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks then ended. Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. The balance sheet as of February 1, 2015, presented herein, has been derived from our audited Consolidated Balance Sheet included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015.

The results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results of the full year.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been omitted. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, to clarify the principles of recognizing revenue and create common revenue recognition guidance between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently assessing the potential impact of this ASU on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE B. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Equity Award Programs

On May 29, 2015, our shareholders approved an amendment and restatement of our Amended and Restated 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to, among other things, increase the shares issuable under the Plan by 6,550,000 shares and extend the term to 2025. The Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights (collectively, “option awards”), restricted stock awards, restricted stock units (including those that are performance-based), deferred stock awards (collectively, “stock awards”) and dividend equivalents up to an aggregate of 32,310,000 shares. As of August 2, 2015, there were approximately 9,348,000 shares available for future grant under the Plan. Awards may be granted under the Plan to officers, employees and non-employee members of our board of directors (the “Board”) or any parent or subsidiary. Shares issued as a result of award exercises or releases are primarily funded with the issuance of new shares.

Option Awards

Annual grants of option awards are limited to 1,000,000 shares on a per person basis and have a maximum term of seven years. The exercise price of these option awards is not less than 100% of the closing price of our stock on the day prior to the grant date. Option awards granted to employees generally vest over a period of four years for service-based awards. Certain option awards contain vesting acceleration clauses resulting from events including, but not limited to, retirement, merger or a similar corporate event.

Stock Awards

Annual grants of stock awards are limited to 1,000,000 shares on a per person basis. Stock awards granted to employees generally vest evenly over a period of four years for service-based awards. Certain performance-based awards, which have variable payout conditions based on predetermined financial targets, vest three years from the date of grant. Certain stock awards and other agreements contain vesting acceleration clauses resulting from events including, but not limited to, retirement, merger or a similar corporate event. Stock awards granted to non-employee Board members generally vest in one year. Non-employee Board members automatically receive stock awards on the date of their initial election to the Board and annually thereafter on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders (so long as they continue to serve as a non-employee Board member).

5

Table of Contents

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

We measure and record stock-based compensation expense for all employee stock-based awards using a fair value method. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense, as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses, of $10,903,000 and $24,913,000, respectively. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense of $9,823,000 and $22,191,000, respectively.

Stock Options

The following table summarizes our stock option activity during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015:

Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights

The following table summarizes our stock-settled stock appreciation right activity during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015:

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes our restricted stock unit activity during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015:

6

Table of Contents

NOTE C. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed as net earnings divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed as net earnings divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents for the period. Common stock equivalents consist of shares subject to stock-based awards with exercise prices less than or equal to the average market price of our common stock for the period, to the extent their inclusion would be dilutive.

The following is a reconciliation of net earnings and the number of shares used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations:

There were no stock-based awards excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the thirteen or twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014.

NOTE D. SEGMENT REPORTING

We have two reportable segments, e-commerce and retail. The e-commerce segment has the following merchandising strategies: Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Pottery Barn Kids, West Elm, PBteen, Williams-Sonoma Home, Rejuvenation and Mark and Graham, which sell our products through our e-commerce websites and direct-mail catalogs. Our e-commerce merchandising strategies are operating segments, which have been aggregated into one reportable segment, e-commerce. The retail segment has the following merchandising strategies: Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Pottery Barn Kids, West Elm and Rejuvenation, which sell our products through our retail stores. Our retail merchandising strategies are operating segments, which have been aggregated into one reportable segment, retail. Our operating segments have had similar historical economic characteristics and it is management’s expectation that the operating segments will have similar long-term financial performance in the future.

These reportable segments are strategic business units that offer similar home-centered products. They are managed separately because the business units utilize two distinct distribution and marketing strategies. Based on management’s best estimate, our operating segments include allocations of certain expenses, including advertising and employment costs, to the extent they have been determined to benefit both channels. These operating segments are aggregated at the channel level for reporting purposes due to the fact that our brands are interdependent for economies of scale and we do not maintain fully allocated income statements at the brand level. As a result, material financial decisions related to the brands are made at the channel level. Furthermore, it is not practicable for us to report revenue by product group.

We use operating income to evaluate segment profitability. Operating income is defined as earnings (loss) before net interest income or expense and income taxes. Unallocated costs before interest and income taxes include employee-related costs, occupancy expenses (including depreciation expense), administrative costs and third party service costs, primarily in our corporate departments. Unallocated assets include corporate cash and cash equivalents, deferred income taxes, the net book value of corporate facilities and related information systems, and other corporate long-lived assets.

7

Table of Contents

Income tax information by reportable segment has not been included as income taxes are calculated at a company-wide level and are not allocated to each reportable segment.

Segment Information

NOTE E. MEMPHIS-BASED DISTRIBUTION FACILITY

Our Memphis-based distribution facility includes an operating lease entered into in August 1990 for a distribution facility in Memphis, Tennessee. The lessor is a general partnership comprised of the estate of W. Howard Lester, our former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and the estate of James A. McMahan, a former Director Emeritus and significant stockholder, and two unrelated parties. The partnership does not have operations separate from the leasing of this distribution facility and does not have lease agreements with any unrelated third parties. The terms of the lease automatically renewed until the bonds that financed the construction of the facility were fully repaid during the second quarter of 2015. Simultaneously, we entered into an agreement with the partnership to lease the facility through July 2017.

Prior to August 2, 2015, the partnership described above qualified as a variable interest entity and was consolidated by us due to its related party relationship and our obligation to renew the lease until the bonds were fully repaid. Accordingly, as of August 2, 2015, this facility is no longer consolidated by us.

NOTE F. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are involved in lawsuits, claims and proceedings incident to the ordinary course of our business. These disputes, which are not currently material, are increasing in number as our business expands and our company grows larger. We review the need for any loss contingency reserves and establish reserves when, in the opinion of management, it is probable that a matter would result in liability, and the amount of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of these matters, it may not be possible to determine whether any loss is probable or to reasonably estimate the amount of the loss until the case is close to resolution, in which case no reserve is established until that time. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources. The results of these lawsuits, claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. However, we believe that the ultimate resolution of these current matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

8

Table of Contents

NOTE G. STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM AND DIVIDEND

Stock Repurchase Program

During the thirteen weeks ended August 2, 2015, we repurchased 899,301 shares of our common stock at an average cost of $80.55 per share for a total cost of approximately $72,438,000. During the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015, we repurchased 1,563,703 shares of our common stock at an average cost of $79.94 per share for a total cost of approximately $125,000,000. As of August 2, 2015, we held treasury stock of $1,936,000 which represents the cost of shares available for re-issuance to satisfy future stock-based award settlements in certain foreign jurisdictions.

During the thirteen weeks ended August 3, 2014, we repurchased 847,946 shares of our common stock at an average cost of $69.28 per share for a total cost of approximately $58,745,000. During the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014, we repurchased 1,688,707 shares of our common stock at an average cost of $66.35 per share for a total cost of approximately $112,054,000.

Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market and privately negotiated transactions at times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements, capital availability and other market conditions. This stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date and may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice.

Dividend

We declared cash dividends of $0.35 and $0.33 per common share during the thirteen weeks ended August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014, respectively. We declared cash dividends of $0.70 and $0.66 per common share during the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014, respectively.

NOTE H. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We have retail and/or e-commerce businesses in Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom, and operations throughout Asia and Europe, which expose us to market risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Substantially all of our purchases and sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, which limits our exposure to this risk. While the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations was not significant to us in the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we continue to see volatility in the exchange rates in the countries in which we do business. As we continue to expand globally, the foreign currency exchange risk related to the transactions of our foreign subsidiaries may increase. To mitigate this risk, we hedge a portion of our foreign currency exposure with foreign currency forward contracts in accordance with our risk management policies. We do not enter into such contracts for speculative purposes.

The assets or liabilities associated with the derivative instruments are measured at fair value and recorded in either other current assets or other current liabilities. As discussed below, the accounting for gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value depends on whether the derivative instrument is designated as a hedge and qualifies for hedge accounting in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, Derivatives and Hedging.

Cash Flow Hedges

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges for forecasted inventory purchases in U.S. dollars by our foreign subsidiaries. These hedges generally have terms of up to 12 months. All hedging relationships are formally documented, and the forward contracts are designed to mitigate foreign currency exchange risk on hedged transactions. We record the effective portion of changes in the fair value of our cash flow hedges in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) until the earlier of when the hedged forecasted inventory purchase occurs or the respective contract reaches maturity. Subsequently, as the inventory is sold to the customer, we reclassify amounts previously recorded in OCI to cost of goods sold. Changes in the fair value of the forward contract related to interest charges or “forward points” are excluded from the assessment and measurement of hedge effectiveness and are recorded immediately in other income (expense), net within selling, general and administrative expenses. Based on the rates in effect as of August 2, 2015, we expect to reclassify a net pre-tax gain of approximately $981,000 from OCI to cost of goods sold over the next 12 months.

We also enter into non-designated foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the exchange risk associated with our assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency. Any foreign exchange gains (losses) related to these contracts are recognized in other income (expense), net.

9

Table of Contents

As of August 2, 2015, and August 3, 2014, we had foreign currency forward contracts outstanding (in U.S. dollars) as follows:

Hedge effectiveness is evaluated prospectively at inception, on an ongoing basis, as well as retrospectively using regression analysis. Any measureable ineffectiveness of the hedge is recorded in other income (expense), net. No gain or loss was recognized for cash flow hedges due to hedge ineffectiveness and all hedges were deemed effective for assessment purposes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 and August 3, 2014.

The effect of derivative instruments in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, pre-tax, was as follows:

The fair values of our derivative financial instruments are presented below. All fair values for these derivatives were measured using Level 2 inputs as defined by the fair value hierarchy described in Note I.

We record all derivative assets and liabilities on a gross basis. They do not meet the balance sheet netting criteria as discussed in ASC 210, Balance Sheet, because we do not have master netting agreements established with our derivative counterparties that would allow for net settlement.

10

Table of Contents

NOTE I. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

We determine the fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities using the fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, which defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, as follows:

The fair values of our cash and cash equivalents are based on Level 1 inputs, which include quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Foreign Currency Derivatives and Hedging Instruments

We use the income approach to value our derivatives using observable Level 2 market data at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value amount, assuming that participants are motivated but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs are limited to quoted prices that are observable for the assets and liabilities, which include interest rates and credit risk ratings. We use mid-market pricing as a practical expedient for fair value measurements. Key inputs for currency derivatives are the spot rates, forward rates, interest rates and credit derivative market rates.

The counterparties associated with our foreign currency forward contracts are large credit-worthy financial institutions, and the derivatives transacted with these entities are relatively short in duration, therefore, we do not consider counterparty concentration and non-performance to be material risks at this time. Both we and our counterparties are expected to perform under the contractual terms of the instruments. None of the derivative contracts entered into are subject to credit risk-related contingent features or collateral requirements.

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 categories during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015.

11

Table of Contents

NOTE J. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income by component, net of tax, are as follows:

12

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they do not fully materialize or are proven incorrect, could cause our business and results of operations to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include statements related to: our beliefs regarding the resolution of current lawsuits, claims and proceedings; our three year stock repurchase program; our expectations regarding our cash flow hedges and foreign currency risks; our planned use of cash; our compliance with our financial covenants; our belief that our cash on-hand, in addition to our available credit facilities, will provide adequate liquidity for our business operations over the next 12 months; our beliefs regarding our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; and our beliefs regarding seasonal patterns associated with our business, as well as statements of belief and statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “intends,” “potential,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above that could cause our results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in this document and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2015, and the risks, uncertainties and assumptions discussed from time to time in our other public filings and public announcements. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. is a specialty retailer of high-quality products for the home. These products, representing distinct merchandise strategies – Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Pottery Barn Kids, West Elm, PBteen, Williams-Sonoma Home, Rejuvenation, and Mark and Graham – are marketed through e-commerce websites, direct mail catalogs and 612 stores. We have retail and/or e-commerce businesses in the U.S., Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom, and ship our products to customers worldwide. Our catalogs reach customers throughout the U.S. and Australia. In addition, we have unaffiliated franchisees that operate stores in the Middle East and the Philippines.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity and capital resources for the thirteen weeks ended August 2, 2015 (“second quarter of fiscal 2015”), as compared to the thirteen weeks ended August 3, 2014 (“second quarter of fiscal 2014”) and the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2015 (“year-to-date 2015”), as compared to the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2014 (“year-to-date 2014”), should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

All explanations of changes in operational results are discussed in order of their magnitude.

Second Quarter of Fiscal 2015 Financial Results

In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, our net revenues increased 8.5% to $1,127,028,000, compared to $1,039,102,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2014, with comparable brand revenue growth of 6.3%. The increase in net revenues was driven by a 9.1% increase in our e-commerce net revenues and a 7.9% increase in our retail net revenues, which includes growth in our foreign revenues of 20.8% and a 4.2% increase in retail leased square footage primarily due to 23 net new stores. By brand, this increase was primarily driven by West Elm and Pottery Barn, with particular strength in furniture. Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 increased to $0.58, versus $0.53 in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and we returned $104,548,000 to our stockholders through stock repurchases and dividends.

E-commerce net revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 increased $47,324,000, or 9.1%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014. This growth was driven by all brands, led by West Elm and Pottery Barn, with particular strength in furniture.

Retail net revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 increased $40,602,000, or 7.9%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014, including growth in our foreign revenues and a 4.2% increase in retail leased square footage primarily due to 23 net new stores. By brand, this increase was primarily driven by Pottery Barn and West Elm, with particular strength in furniture, partially offset by a decrease in Williams-Sonoma.

In Pottery Barn, our largest brand, comparable brand revenues increased 6.4% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Both our indoor and outdoor furniture businesses drove these results. In the Williams-Sonoma brand, comparable brand revenues decreased 0.3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Growth in the cookware, cutlery, and tabletop categories and our Williams-Sonoma Home business was more than offset by decreases in the electrics category, where the timing of key product launch activity did not align with the second quarter of fiscal 2014. In West

13

Table of Contents

Elm, comparable brand revenues increased 15.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 on top of 16.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Growth continued to be broad-based across categories, with strength in furniture, decorative accessories and lighting. In Pottery Barn Kids, comparable brand revenues increased 3.3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014, primarily driven by our furniture and back-to-school businesses. In PBteen, comparable brand revenues increased 3.9% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Improved inventory positions in furniture and back-to-school contributed to these results.

Results of Operations

NET REVENUES

Net revenues consist of e-commerce net revenues and retail net revenues. E-commerce net revenues include sales of merchandise to customers through our e-commerce websites and our catalogs, as well as shipping fees. Retail net revenues include sales of merchandise to customers at our retail stores, as well as shipping fees on any products shipped to our customers’ homes. Shipping fees consist of revenue received from customers for delivery of merchandise to their homes. Revenues are presented net of sales returns and other discounts.

The following table summarizes our net revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, and year-to-date 2015 and 2014:

Net revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 increased by $87,926,000, or 8.5%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014, with comparable brand revenue growth of 6.3%. The increase in net revenues was driven by a 9.1% increase in our e-commerce net revenues and a 7.9% increase in our retail net revenues, which includes growth in our foreign revenues of 20.8% and a 4.2% increase in retail leased square footage primarily due to 23 net new stores. By brand, this increase was primarily driven by West Elm and Pottery Barn, with particular strength in furniture.

Net revenues for year-to-date 2015 increased by $144,272,000 or 7.2%, compared to year-to-date 2014, with comparable brand revenue growth of 5.5%. The increase in net revenues was driven by an 8.7% increase in our e-commerce net revenues and a 5.6% increase in our retail net revenues, including a 4.2% increase in retail leased square footage primarily due to 23 net new stores and growth in our foreign revenues of 14.3%. This growth was driven by all brands, led by West Elm and Pottery Barn, with particular strength in furniture.

Comparable Brand Revenue Growth

Comparable brand revenues include retail comparable store sales and e-commerce sales, as well as shipping fees, sales returns and other discounts associated with current period sales. Outlet comparable store net revenues are included in their respective brands. Comparable brand revenues exclude sales from certain operations until such time that we believe those sales are meaningful to evaluating the performance of the brand. Sales related to our international franchised stores have also been excluded as they are not operated by us.

Comparable stores are defined as permanent stores where gross square footage did not change by more than 20% in the previous 12 months and which have been open for at least 12 consecutive months without closure for seven or more consecutive days.

14

Table of Contents

E-COMMERCE NET REVENUES

E-commerce net revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 increased $47,324,000, or 9.1%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014. This growth was driven by all brands, led by West Elm and Pottery Barn, with particular strength in furniture.

E-commerce net revenues for year-to-date 2015 increased by $88,608,000, or 8.7%, compared to year-to-date 2014. This growth was driven by all brands, led by West Elm and Pottery Barn, with particular strength in furniture.

RETAIL NET REVENUES AND OTHER DATA

Retail net revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 increased $40,602,000, or 7.9%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014, including growth in our foreign revenues and a 4.2% increase in retail leased square footage primarily due to 23 net new stores. By brand, this increase was primarily driven by Pottery Barn and West Elm, with particular strength in furniture, partially offset by a decrease in Williams-Sonoma.

Retail net revenues for year-to-date 2015 increased by $55,664,000, or 5.6%, compared to year-to-date 2014, including growth in our foreign revenues and a 4.2% increase in retail leased square footage primarily due to 23 net new stores. By brand, this increase was primarily driven by West Elm and Pottery Barn, with particular strength in furniture, partially offset by a decrease in Williams-Sonoma.

15

Table of Contents

COST OF GOODS SOLD

Cost of goods sold includes cost of goods, occupancy expenses and shipping costs. Cost of goods consists of cost of merchandise, inbound freight to our stores and distribution centers and other inventory related costs such as shrinkage, damages and replacements. Occupancy expenses consist of rent, depreciation and other occupancy costs, including common area maintenance, property taxes and utilities. Shipping costs consist of third party delivery services and shipping materials.

Our classification of expenses in cost of goods sold may not be comparable to other public companies, as we do not include non-occupancy related costs associated with our distribution network in cost of goods sold. These costs, which include distribution network employment, third party warehouse management and other distribution related administrative expenses, are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Within our reportable segments, the e-commerce channel does not incur freight-to-store or store occupancy expenses, and typically operates with lower markdowns and inventory shrinkage than the retail channel. However, the e-commerce channel incurs higher customer shipping, damage and replacement costs than the retail channel.

Second Quarter of Fiscal 2015 vs. Second Quarter of Fiscal 2014

Cost of goods sold increased by $63,399,000, or 9.6%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net revenues increased to 63.9% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 from 63.2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. This increase was primarily from increased shipping and fulfillment-related costs associated with the west coast port disruption, partially offset by the leverage of occupancy expenses.

In the e-commerce channel, cost of goods sold as a percentage of net revenues increased in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014 driven by increased shipping and fulfillment-related costs associated with the west coast port disruption, as well as occupancy expense deleverage.

In the retail channel, cost of goods sold as a percentage of net revenues decreased in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily driven by the leverage of occupancy expenses, partially offset by increased shipping costs associated with the west coast port disruption.

Year-to-date Fiscal 2015 vs. Year-to-date Fiscal 2014

Cost of goods sold for year-to-date 2015 increased by $109,312,000, or 8.7%, compared to year-to-date 2014. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net revenues increased to 63.6% for year-to-date 2015 from 62.7% for year-to-date 2014. This increase was driven by increased shipping and fulfillment-related costs associated with the west coast port disruption, partially offset by the leverage of occupancy expenses.

In the e-commerce channel, cost of goods sold as a percentage of net revenues increased for year-to-date 2015 compared to year-to-date 2014, driven by increased shipping and fulfillment-related costs associated with the west coast port disruption.

In the retail channel, cost of goods sold as a percentage of net revenues increased for year-to-date 2015 compared to year-to-date 2014 driven by increased shipping costs associated with the west coast port disruption, partially offset by the leverage of occupancy expenses.

16

Table of Contents

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of non-occupancy related costs associated with our retail stores, distribution warehouses, customer care centers, supply chain operations (buying, receiving and inspection) and corporate administrative functions. These costs include employment, advertising, third party credit card processing and other general expenses.

We experience differing employment and advertising costs as a percentage of net revenues within the retail and e-commerce channels due to their distinct distribution and marketing strategies. Store employment costs represent a greater percentage of retail net revenues than e-commerce employment costs as a percentage of e-commerce net revenues. However, advertising expenses are higher within the e-commerce channel than in the retail channel.

Second Quarter of Fiscal 2015 vs. Second Quarter of Fiscal 2014

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $26,520,000, or 8.9%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased to 28.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 from 28.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in employment costs associated with incremental labor costs in our supply chain as a result of a higher volume of inventory receipts, offset by advertising efficiencies.

In the e-commerce channel, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily driven by advertising efficiencies, partially offset by an increase in employment costs associated with incremental labor costs in our supply chain as a result of a higher volume of inventory receipts.

In the retail channel, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues remained flat in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2014.

Year-to-date Fiscal 2015 vs. Year-to-date Fiscal 2014

Selling, general and administrative expenses for year-to-date 2015 increased by $39,351,000, or 6.7%, compared to year-to-date 2014. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 29.2% for year-to-date 2015 from 29.3% for year-to-date 2014. This decrease was primarily driven by advertising efficiencies, partially offset by an increase in other general expenses.

In the e-commerce channel, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased for year-to-date 2015 compared to year-to-date 2014 primarily driven by advertising efficiencies.

In the retail channel, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues remained flat for year-to-date 2015 compared to year-to-date 2014.

INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate was 36.5% for year-to-date 2015 and 39.3% for year-to-date 2014, reflecting the favorable resolution of certain income tax matters.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of August 2, 2015, we held $119,776,000 in cash and cash equivalents, the majority of which is held in demand deposit accounts, of which $78,784,000 was held by our foreign subsidiaries. As is consistent within our industry, our cash balances are seasonal in nature, with the fourth quarter historically representing a significantly higher level of cash than other periods.

In fiscal 2015, we plan to use our cash resources to fund our inventory and inventory related purchases, advertising and marketing initiatives, stock repurchases, dividend payments and purchases of property and equipment. In addition to our cash balances on hand, we have a $500,000,000 unsecured revolving line of credit (“credit facility”) that may be used to borrow revolving loans or to request the issuance of letters of credit. We may, upon notice to the administrative agent, request existing or new lenders to increase the credit

17

Table of Contents

facility by up to $250,000,000, at such lenders’ option, to provide for a total of $750,000,000 of unsecured revolving credit. During the second quarter of 2015 we borrowed $90,000,000 under the credit facility, and as of August 2, 2015, we had borrowings of $150,000,000 outstanding under our credit facility. During the second quarter of 2014 and for year-to-date 2014, we had no borrowings under the credit facility.

As of August 2, 2015, issued but undrawn standby letters of credit totaling $13,867,000 were outstanding under the credit facility. Additionally, as of August 2, 2015, we had three unsecured letter of credit reimbursement facilities for a total of $70,000,000, of which an aggregate of $8,117,000 was outstanding. On August 28, 2015, we renewed all three of our letter of credit facilities for an aggregate of $70,000,000, and extended each of these facilities’ maturity dates until August 27, 2016. These letter of credit facilities represent only a future commitment to fund inventory purchases to which we had not taken legal title. We are currently in compliance with all of our financial covenants under the credit facility and, based on our current projections, we expect to remain in compliance throughout fiscal 2015. We believe our cash on hand, in addition to our available credit facilities, will provide adequate liquidity for our business operations over the next 12 months.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

For year-to-date 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was $36,805,000 compared to $10,217,000 for year-to-date 2014. For year-to-date 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to net earnings adjusted for non-cash items and an increase in customer deposits and deferred rent and lease incentives, partially offset by an increase in merchandise inventories and a decrease in accrued liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities increased compared to year-to-date 2014 primarily due to an increase in accounts payable, partially offset by an increase in merchandise inventories.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

For year-to-date 2015, net cash used in investing activities was $86,571,000 compared to $68,948,000 for year-to-date 2014, and was primarily attributable to purchases of property and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities compared to year-to-date 2014 increased primarily due to restricted cash receipts received in year-to-date 2014 that did not recur in year-to-date 2015.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

For year-to-date 2015, net cash used in financing activities was $53,733,000 compared to $200,893,000 for year-to-date 2014. For year-to-date 2015, net cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to repurchases of common stock and the payment of dividends, partially offset by borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Net cash used in financing activities compared to year-to-date 2014 decreased primarily due to borrowings of $150,000,000 under our revolving line of credit in year-to-date 2015 and a decrease in tax withholdings related to stock-based awards.

Stock Repurchase Program and Dividend

See Note G to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Stock Repurchase Program and Dividend, within Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis and are based on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates. During the second quarter of fiscal 2015, there have been no significant changes to the critical accounting policies discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2015.

Seasonality

Our business is subject to substantial seasonal variations in demand. Historically, a significant portion of our revenues and net earnings have been realized during the period from October through January, and levels of net revenues and net earnings have typically been lower during the period from February through September. We believe this is the general pattern associated with the retail industry. In anticipation of our holiday selling season, we hire a substantial number of additional temporary employees in our retail stores, customer care centers and distribution centers, and incur significant fixed catalog production and mailing costs.

18

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risks, which include significant deterioration of the U.S. and foreign markets, changes in U.S. interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, including the devaluation of the U.S. dollar, and the effects of economic uncertainty which may affect the prices we pay our vendors in the foreign countries in which we do business. We do not engage in financial transactions for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

Our line of credit facility has a variable interest rate which, when drawn upon, subjects us to risks associated with changes in that interest rate. As of August 2, 2015, we had borrowings of $150,000,000 outstanding under our line of credit facility. A hypothetical increase or decrease of one percentage point on our existing variable rate debt instrument would not materially affect our results of operations or cash flows.

In addition, we have fixed and variable income investments consisting of short-term investments classified as cash and cash equivalents, which are also affected by changes in market interest rates. As of August 2, 2015, our investments, made primarily in demand deposit accounts, are stated at cost and approximate their fair values.

Foreign Currency Risks

We purchase a significant amount of inventory from vendors outside of the U.S. in transactions that are denominated in U.S. dollars. Approximately 2% of our international purchase transactions are in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro. Any foreign currency impact related to these international purchase transactions was not significant to us during the second quarter of fiscal 2015 or the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Since we pay for the majority of our international purchases in U.S. dollars, however, a decline in the U.S. dollar relative to other foreign currencies may subject us to risks associated with increased purchasing costs from our vendors in their effort to offset any lost profits associated with any currency devaluation. We cannot predict with certainty the effect that currency fluctuations may have on our financial statements or results of operations.

In addition, our retail and/or e-commerce businesses in Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom, and our operations throughout Asia and Europe, expose us to market risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Substantially all of our purchases and sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, which limits our exposure to this risk. While the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations was not material to us in the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we have continued to see volatility in the exchange rates in the countries in which we do business. As we continue to expand globally, the foreign currency exchange risk related to our foreign operations may increase. To mitigate this risk, we hedge a portion of our foreign currency exposure with foreign currency forward contracts in accordance with our risk management policies (see Note H to our Consolidated Financial Statements).

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of August 2, 2015, an evaluation was performed by management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for timely discussions regarding required disclosures, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

19

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information required by this Item is contained in Note F to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements within Part I of this Form 10-Q.

ITEM  1A. RISK FACTORS

See Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015 for a description of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business. There were no material changes to such risk factors in the current quarterly reporting period.

ITEM  2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table provides information as of August 2, 2015 with respect to shares of common stock we repurchased during the second quarter of fiscal 2015. For additional information, please see Note G to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements within Part I of this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

20

Table of Contents

ITEM  6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

21

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: September 11, 2015

22