Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2018 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-37461
![adclogohorizontala04.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001459200/000145920018000028/adclogohorizontala04.jpg)
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 26-4247032 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
8281 Greensboro Drive, Suite 100, Tysons, Virginia | 22102 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (zip code) |
Tel: (877) 389-4033
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | þ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |||
Smaller reporting company | ¨ | Emerging growth company | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes þ No
As of July 31, 2018, there were 47,695,625 outstanding shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | $ | 70,968 | $ | 58,928 | $ | 138,956 | $ | 109,154 | |||||||
Hardware and other revenue | 33,520 | 27,060 | 58,288 | 51,028 | |||||||||||
Total revenue | 104,488 | 85,988 | 197,244 | 160,182 | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue(1): | |||||||||||||||
Cost of SaaS and license revenue | 11,027 | 8,500 | 21,833 | 16,592 | |||||||||||
Cost of hardware and other revenue | 25,461 | 21,335 | 43,032 | 39,878 | |||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 36,488 | 29,835 | 64,865 | 56,470 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 14,612 | 11,899 | 25,434 | 22,213 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 18,119 | 13,450 | 34,281 | 28,825 | |||||||||||
Research and development | 21,521 | 20,062 | 41,898 | 34,583 | |||||||||||
Amortization and depreciation | 5,238 | 4,846 | 10,263 | 7,710 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 59,490 | 50,257 | 111,876 | 93,331 | |||||||||||
Operating income | 8,510 | 5,896 | 20,503 | 10,381 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (751 | ) | (674 | ) | (1,423 | ) | (890 | ) | |||||||
Other income, net | 420 | 137 | 816 | 374 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 8,179 | 5,359 | 19,896 | 9,865 | |||||||||||
Benefit from income taxes | (2,554 | ) | (4,506 | ) | (1,352 | ) | (3,963 | ) | |||||||
Net income | 10,733 | 9,865 | 21,248 | 13,828 | |||||||||||
Income allocated to participating securities | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 10,732 | $ | 9,860 | $ | 21,244 | $ | 13,820 | |||||||
Per share information attributable to common stockholders: | |||||||||||||||
Net income per share: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.28 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 47,439,311 | 46,442,327 | 47,333,435 | 46,334,499 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 49,497,088 | 49,000,553 | 49,406,444 | 48,906,812 |
_______________
(1) | Exclusive of amortization and depreciation shown in operating expenses below. |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Assets | |||||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 105,959 | $ | 96,329 | |||
Accounts receivable, net | 52,553 | 40,634 | |||||
Inventory, net | 14,718 | 14,177 | |||||
Other current assets | 20,681 | 12,796 | |||||
Total current assets | 193,911 | 163,936 | |||||
Property and equipment, net | 26,587 | 23,459 | |||||
Intangible assets, net | 86,669 | 94,286 | |||||
Goodwill | 63,591 | 63,591 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | 18,826 | 18,444 | |||||
Other assets | 13,212 | 7,925 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 402,796 | $ | 371,641 | |||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 32,130 | $ | 29,084 | |||
Accrued compensation | 10,056 | 12,127 | |||||
Deferred revenue | 3,460 | 3,292 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 45,646 | 44,503 | |||||
Deferred revenue | 8,511 | 9,386 | |||||
Long-term debt | 69,000 | 71,000 | |||||
Other liabilities | 13,441 | 13,925 | |||||
Total liabilities | 136,598 | 138,814 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) | |||||||
Stockholders’ equity | |||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. | — | — | |||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 47,698,797 and 47,215,720 shares issued; and 47,691,722 and 47,202,310 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. | 477 | 472 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 330,028 | 321,032 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (64,307 | ) | (88,677 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity | 266,198 | 232,827 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 402,796 | $ | 371,641 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | 2018 | 2017 | |||||
Net income | $ | 21,248 | $ | 13,828 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: | |||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | 57 | 20 | |||||
Reserve for product returns | 174 | 1,144 | |||||
Amortization on patents and tooling | 512 | 574 | |||||
Amortization and depreciation | 10,263 | 7,710 | |||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 54 | 47 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | (1,338 | ) | (2,833 | ) | |||
Undistributed losses from equity investees | — | 120 | |||||
Stock-based compensation | 6,213 | 3,228 | |||||
Disposal of property and equipment | 285 | — | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of business acquisitions): | |||||||
Accounts receivable | (12,150 | ) | (1,998 | ) | |||
Inventory | (541 | ) | 579 | ||||
Other assets | (9,492 | ) | (5,425 | ) | |||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 1,110 | 7,602 | |||||
Deferred revenue | (707 | ) | (495 | ) | |||
Other liabilities | (484 | ) | 635 | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities | 15,204 | 24,736 | |||||
Cash flows used in investing activities: | |||||||
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — | (154,289 | ) | ||||
Additions to property and equipment | (6,131 | ) | (5,714 | ) | |||
Issuances of notes receivable | — | (4,000 | ) | ||||
Cash flows used in investing activities | (6,131 | ) | (164,003 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
Proceeds from credit facility | — | 67,000 | |||||
Repayments of credit facility | (2,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | |||
Repurchases of common stock | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | |||
Issuances of common stock from equity based plans | 2,558 | 1,551 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | 557 | 67,549 | |||||
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 9,630 | (71,718 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | 96,329 | 140,634 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | $ | 105,959 | $ | 68,916 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2018 and 2017
(unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (referred to herein as Alarm.com, the Company, or we) is the leading platform for the intelligently connected property. We offer a comprehensive suite of cloud-based solutions for the smart residential and commercial property, including interactive security, video monitoring, intelligent automation and energy management. Millions of property owners rely on our technology to intelligently secure, monitor and manage their residential and commercial properties. Our solutions are delivered through an established network of over 7,000 trusted service provider partners, who are experts at selling, installing and supporting our solutions. We derive revenue from the sale of our cloud-based Software-as-a-Service, or SaaS, services, license fees, software, hardware, activation fees and other revenue. Our fiscal year ends on December 31.
Note 2. Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, for interim financial information and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual financial statements. They should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2017 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2018, or the 2017 Annual Report. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017 was derived from our audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements.
In the opinion of management, these condensed consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for our entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates are used when accounting for revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, allowance for hardware returns, estimates of obsolete inventory, long-term incentive compensation, stock-based compensation, income taxes, legal reserves, contingent consideration and goodwill and intangible assets.
Significant Accounting Policies
Except for as disclosed herein, there have been no other material changes to our significant accounting policies during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 from those disclosed in our 2017 Annual Report.
Revenue Recognition
We derive our revenue from three primary sources: the sale of cloud-based SaaS services on our integrated Alarm.com platform, the sale of licenses and services on the Connect software platform and the sale of hardware products. We sell our platform and hardware solutions to service provider partners that resell our solutions and hardware to residential and commercial property owners, who are the service provider partners’ customers. Our subscribers consist of all of the properties maintained by those residential and commercial property owners to which we are delivering at least one of our solutions. We also sell our hardware to distributors who resell the hardware to service provider partners. We enter into contracts with our service provider partners that establish pricing for access to our platform solutions and for the sale of hardware. These contracts typically have an initial term of one year, with subsequent renewal terms of one year. Our service provider partners typically enter into contracts with our subscribers, which our service provider partners have indicated range from three to five years in length.
Our hardware includes cellular radio modules that enable access to our cloud-based platforms, as well as video cameras, image sensors and other peripherals. Our service provider partners may purchase our hardware in anticipation of installing the hardware in a residential or commercial property when they create a new subscriber account, or for use in existing subscriber
5
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
properties. The purchase of hardware occurs in a transaction that is separate and typically in advance of the purchase of our platform services. The performance obligation is satisfied when the hardware is received by our service provider partner or distributor. Service provider partners transact with us to purchase our platform solutions and resell our solutions to a new subscriber, or to upgrade or downgrade the solutions of an existing subscriber, at which time the subscriber’s access to our platform solutions is enabled and the delivery of the services commences. Our performance obligation related to providing our platform solutions is satisfied on a daily basis as the subscriber uses the platform services. The purchase of platform solutions and the purchase of hardware are separate transactions as revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services are transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. We generate all of our revenue from contracts with customers.
SaaS and license revenue associated with our contracts is invoiced and revenue is recognized at an amount that corresponds directly with the value of the performance completed to date. Additionally, the consideration received from hardware sales corresponds directly with the stand-alone selling price of the hardware. As a result, we have elected to use the practical expedient related to the amount of transaction price allocated to the unsatisfied performance obligations and therefore, we have not disclosed the total remaining revenue expected to be recognized on all contracts or the expected period over which the remaining revenue would be recognized for the current period or any period presented before January 1, 2018.
To determine the transaction price, we analyze all of the performance obligations included in the contract. We consider the terms of the contract and our customary business practices, which typically do not include financing components or non-cash consideration. We have variable consideration in the form of retrospective volume discounts, rebate incentives, restocking fees and assurance-type warranties. The significant inputs related to variable consideration include the volume and amount of products and services sold historically and expected to be sold in the future, the availability and performance of our services and the historical and expected number of returns. Depending on the type of variable consideration and its predictability, we may apply an “expected value” approach or a “most likely amount” approach. We estimate the variable consideration at the onset of a contract and include the variable consideration within the transaction price if it is probable that a significant reversal of the variable consideration would not occur in the future. When determining whether the amount of variable consideration included in the transaction price should be constrained, we look at the history of hardware purchased and subscribers added by our service provider partners to estimate the likelihood of those service provider partners obtaining the retrospective volume discounts and rebates. At times, our contracts include consideration payable to a customer in the form of fixed discounts or rebates. We record the consideration payable to a customer as a reduction to the transaction price resulting in a reduction to revenue over the service period.
If we enter into contracts that contain multiple promised services, we evaluate which of the promised services represent separate performance obligations based on whether or not the promised services are distinct and whether or not the services are separable from other promises in the contract. If these criteria are met, then we allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations using the relative stand-alone selling price method at contract inception.
In determining the relative estimated selling prices, we consider market conditions, entity-specific factors and information about the customer or class of customer. Any discount within the contract is allocated proportionately to all of the separate performance obligations in the contract unless the terms of discount relate specifically to the entity’s efforts to satisfy some but not all of the performance obligations.
For our standard service provider agreements, we have used a portfolio approach for purposes of revenue recognition, as each agreement has similar characteristics and we do not expect the effects of applying this approach would have a material impact on our financial statements as compared to assessing each agreement individually.
SaaS and License Revenue
We generate the majority of our SaaS and license revenue primarily from monthly fees charged to our service provider partners sold on a per subscriber basis for access to our cloud-based intelligently connected property platform and related solutions. Our fees per subscriber vary based upon the service plan and features utilized.
Under the terms of our contractual arrangements with our service provider partners, we bill a monthly fee to our service provider partners in advance of the month of service, with the exception of the initial partial month of service, which is paid in arrears. Due to the limited period of time between receipt of payment and delivery of service, we have not accounted for these advance payments as significant financing components. We typically transfer the promised SaaS services to our customers over time, which is evidenced by the fact that the customers receive and consume the benefits provided by our performance of the services as such services are rendered. As a result, we recognize revenue from SaaS services on a monthly basis as we satisfy our performance obligations. We have demonstrated that we can sell our SaaS offering on a stand-alone basis, as it can be sold separately from hardware and activation services. As there is neither a minimum required initial service term nor a stated renewal term in our contractual arrangements, we recognize revenue over the period of service, which is monthly. Our service provider partners typically incur and pay the same monthly fee per subscriber account for the entire period a subscriber account is active.
6
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
We offer multiple service level packages for our platform solutions including a range of solutions and a range of a la carte add-ons for additional features. The fee paid by our service provider partners each month for the delivery of our solutions is based on the combination of packages and add-ons enabled for each subscriber. We utilize tiered pricing plans where our service provider partners may receive prospective pricing discounts driven by volume.
We also generate SaaS and license revenue from the fees paid to us when we license our intellectual property to third parties for use of our patents. We bill a monthly fee to third parties based on the number of customers that were active during the prior month. We apply the usage-based royalty exception to recognize license revenue because the sole or predominant item to which the royalty relates is the license of intellectual property. Under the usage-based royalty exception, we recognize revenue on a monthly basis over the period of service. In addition, in certain markets our EnergyHub subsidiary sells its demand response service for an annual service fee, with pricing based on the number of subscribers or amount of aggregate electricity demand made available for a utility’s or market’s control.
Software License Revenue
Our SaaS and license revenue also includes our software license revenue from monthly fees charged to service providers sold on a per subscriber basis for access to our Connect software platform. The Connect software for interactive security, automation and related solutions is typically deployed and operated by the service provider in its own network operations center. Our agreements for the Connect platform solution typically include software and services, such as post-contract customer support, or PCS. Software sales that include multiple elements are typically allocated to the various elements using the relative stand-alone selling price method. We apply the usage-based royalty exception to recognize license revenue associated with software hosted by our customers because the predominant item to which the royalty relates is the license of intellectual property. Under the usage-based royalty exception, we recognize revenue on a monthly basis over the period during which the services are expected to be performed. Under the terms of our contractual arrangements with our service provider partners, we are entitled to payment of a monthly fee that is billed per subscriber for the month of service. Our software license revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 was $10.2 million and $20.1 million, respectively, as compared to $8.5 million and $10.8 million for the same periods in the prior year.
Hardware and Other Revenue
We generate hardware and other revenue primarily from the sale of video cameras and cellular radio modules that provide access to our cloud-based platforms and, to a lesser extent, the sale of other devices, including image sensors and peripherals. We primarily transfer hardware to our customers upon delivery to the customer, which corresponds with the time at which the customer obtains legal title to the hardware. As a result, we recognize hardware and other revenue as we satisfy our performance obligations, which occurs when the hardware is received by our service provider partner or distributor, net of a reserve for estimated returns. There are a few contracts in which we provide shipping and handling services to the customer after control of the hardware transfers to the customer. In these instances, we have elected to account for shipping and handling costs as activities performed to fulfill the promise to transfer hardware to the customer and not as a separate promised service.
Amounts due from the sale of hardware are payable in accordance with the terms of our agreements with our service provider partners or distributors, and are not contingent on resale to end-users, or to service provider partners in the case of sales of hardware to distributors. Payment for our hardware is typically due within 30 days from shipment, with the exception of certain hardware finance arrangements, which are paid over a 36-month period. Our terms for hardware sales sold directly to either service provider partners or distributors typically allow for the return of hardware up to one year past the date of sale. Our distributors sell directly to our service provider partners under terms between the two parties.
When determining the amount of consideration we expect to be entitled to for the sale of our hardware, we estimate the variable consideration associated with customer returns. We record a reserve against revenue for hardware returns based on historical returns, which was 2% of hardware and other revenue for each of the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. We evaluate our hardware reserve on a quarterly basis or if there is an indication of significant changes in return experience. Historically, our returns of hardware have not significantly differed from our estimated reserve. In general, we provide assurance-type warranties related to the intended functionality of the products and services provided. These warranties were not identified as separate performance obligations.
Hardware and other revenue also includes activation fees charged to service provider partners for activation of a new subscriber account on our platforms, as well as fees paid by service provider partners for our marketing services. Our service provider partners use services on our platforms, such as support tools and applications, to assist in the installation of our solutions in subscriber properties. This installation marks the beginning of the service period on our platforms and, on occasion, we earn activation revenue for fees charged for this service. The activation fee is non-refundable, separately negotiated and specified in our contractual arrangements with our service provider partners and is charged to the service provider partner for each subscriber activated on our platforms. The decision whether to charge an activation fee is based in part on the expected number of subscribers to be added by our service provider partners and as a result, many of our largest service provider
7
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
partners do not pay an activation fee. Activation fees are not offered on a stand-alone basis separate from our SaaS offering and are billed and received at the beginning of the arrangement. We record activation fees initially as deferred revenue and we recognize these fees ratably over the expected term of the subscribers’ account which we estimate is ten years based on our annual attrition rate. The portion of these activation fees included in current and long-term deferred revenue as of our balance sheet date represents the amounts that will be recognized ratably as revenue over the following twelve months, or longer as appropriate, until the ten-year expected term is complete. The balance of deferred revenue for activation fees was $9.9 million and $10.5 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which combines current and long-term balances.
Cost of Revenue
Our cost of SaaS and license revenue primarily includes the amounts paid to wireless network providers and, to a lesser extent, the costs of running our network operation centers which are expensed as incurred, as well as royalty costs in connection with technology licensed from third-party providers. Our cost of SaaS and license revenue also includes our cost of software license revenue, which primarily includes the payroll and payroll-related costs of the department dedicated to providing service exclusively to those service providers that host the Connect platform. Our cost of software license revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 was $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, as compared to $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the same periods in the prior year. Our cost of hardware and other revenue primarily includes cost of raw materials and amounts paid to our third-party manufacturer for production and fulfillment of our cellular radio modules and image sensors, and procurement costs for our video cameras, which we purchase from an original equipment manufacturer, and other devices. Our cost of hardware and other revenue also includes royalty costs in connection with technology licensed from third-party providers.
We record the cost of SaaS and license revenue as expenses are incurred, which corresponds to the delivery period of our services to our subscribers. We record the cost of hardware and other revenue when the hardware and other services are delivered to the service provider partner, which occurs when legal title transfers to the service provider partner. Our cost of revenue excludes amortization and depreciation.
Contract Asset and Contract Liability Balances
At contract inception, we assess the goods and services promised in our contracts with customers and identify a performance obligation for each distinct promise to transfer a good or service, or bundle of goods or services. To identify the performance obligations, we consider all of the goods or services promised in the contract, whether explicitly stated or implied based on customary business practices. We record a contract asset when we satisfy a performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service. Contract assets can be conditional or unconditional depending on whether another performance obligation must be satisfied before payment can be received. We receive payments from our service provider partners based on the billing schedule established in our contracts. All of the accounts receivable presented in the balance sheet represent unconditional rights to consideration. We do not have any assets from contracts containing conditional rights and we do not have any assets from satisfied performance obligations that have not been invoiced. Our contract assets consist of capitalized commission costs, which are discussed below in the “Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Contract” section of Note 2.
The changes in our contract assets are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | ||||||
Beginning of period balance | $ | 2,953 | $ | — | |||
Commission costs capitalized in period | 412 | 3,855 | |||||
Amortization of capitalized commission costs | (486 | ) | (976 | ) | |||
End of period balance | $ | 2,879 | $ | 2,879 |
Contract liabilities include payments received in advance of performance under the contract, and are realized with the associated revenue recognized under the contract. All of the deferred revenue presented in the balance sheet represents contract liabilities resulting from advance cash receipts from customers or amounts billed in advance to customers from the sale of services. Changes in deferred revenue are due to our performance under the contract as well as to cash received from new contracts for which services have not been provided.
8
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
The changes in our contract liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Beginning of period balance | $ | 12,133 | $ | 12,983 | $ | 12,678 | $ | 12,625 | |||||||
Revenue deferred in period | 891 | 1,025 | 1,481 | 2,315 | |||||||||||
Revenue recognized from amounts included in contract liabilities | (1,053 | ) | (1,307 | ) | (2,188 | ) | (2,239 | ) | |||||||
End of period balance | $ | 11,971 | $ | 12,701 | $ | 11,971 | $ | 12,701 |
The revenue recognized from amounts included in contract liabilities primarily relates to payments of activation fees as well as prepayment contracts with customers.
Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Contract
We recognize an asset related to the costs incurred to obtain a contract only if we expect to recover those costs and we would not have incurred those costs if the contract had not been obtained. We recognize an asset from the costs incurred to fulfill a contract if the costs (i) are specifically identifiable to a contract, (ii) enhance resources that will be used in satisfying performance obligations in future and (iii) are expected to be recovered. Based on the policy above, we capitalize a portion of our commission costs as an incremental cost of obtaining a contract. When calculating the incremental cost of obtaining a contract, we exclude any commission costs related to metrics that could be satisfied without obtaining a contract, including training-related metrics. We amortize our commission costs over a period of three years, which is consistent with the period over which the products and services related to the commission are transferred to the customer. The three-year period was determined based on our review of historical enhancements and upgrades to our products and services. We applied the portfolio approach to account for the amortization of contract costs as each contract has similar characteristics.
The current portion of capitalized commission costs is included in other current assets within our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The non-current portion of capitalized commission costs is reflected in other assets within our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We amortized capitalized commission costs of $0.5 million and $1.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. There were no amortized commission costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
We review the capitalized costs for impairment at least annually. Impairment exists if the carrying amount of the asset recognized from contract costs exceeds the remaining amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing the goods and services to which such asset relates, less the costs that relate directly to providing those good and services and that have not been recognized as an expense. We did not record an impairment loss on our capitalized commission costs or any other contract assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adopted
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606):
In May 2014, the Financing Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, and International Accounting Standards Board jointly issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," a new revenue recognition standard that provides a framework for addressing revenue issues, improves the comparability of revenue recognition practices across industries, provides useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements and simplifies the presentation of financial statements. From March to December 2016, amendments to Topic 606 were issued to clarify numerous accounting topics, including, but not limited to: (i) the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations, (ii) the identification of performance obligations, (iii) the licensing implementation guidance, (iv) the objective of the collectability criterion, (v) the application of the variable consideration guidance and modified retrospective transition method, (vi) the way in which impairment testing is performed and (vii) the disclosure requirements for revenue recognized from performance obligations. This guidance permits the use of either a full retrospective method or a modified retrospective method. This guidance was effective beginning January 1, 2018.
On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 by applying the modified retrospective transition method to all of our contracts. Comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the periods presented. The adoption of Topic 606 did not have a material impact on our revenue recognition policies, however, as a result of adopting the new standard, we changed our treatment of commissions paid to employees, which we previously
9
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
expensed as incurred. Under the new standard, we capitalize a portion of our commission costs as an incremental cost of obtaining a contract and amortize our commission costs over a period of three years, which is consistent with the period over which the products and services related to the commission are transferred to the customer. Based on the results of our evaluation, the adoption of Topic 606 did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. Additionally, the cumulative effect to the opening balance sheet on January 1, 2018 from the adoption of Topic 606 was not material.
Other Accounting Standards:
On May 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Scope of Modification Accounting," which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The update provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 718. Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU 2017-09 during the first quarter of 2018 and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures.
On January 5, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business," which provides guidance to assist entities in evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. To be considered a business, an acquisition would have to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU 2017-01 during the first quarter of 2018 and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Topic 825-10)" and in February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-03, "Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10)." These ASUs require entities to carry all investments in equity securities at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income. Under these standards, equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values are measured at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. The guidance in ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance in ASU 2018-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2018. We adopted ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03 in 2018 and the adoption of these ASUs did not have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures.
Not Yet Adopted
On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)," which provides guidance designed to provide financial statement users with more information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. When determining such expected credit losses, the guidance requires companies to apply a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendment is effective on a modified retrospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently assessing the impact this pronouncement may have on our trade receivables and notes receivables.
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” or Topic 842, which requires lessees to recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet. The update also requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We plan to adopt Topic 842 effective January 1, 2019. The update must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. In July 2018, the FASB amended the update to allow entities to apply the transition requirements of Topic 842 at the adoption date rather than at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. We plan to use this optional transition method, which will require us to record the effect of initially applying Topic 842 as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings on January 1, 2019.
We plan to use the package of practical expedients for the adoption of Topic 842, which will allow us not to reassess: (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) whether initial direct costs for any existing leases qualify for capitalization under Topic 842. Additionally, we plan to use the hindsight practical expedient when determining the lease term and assessing impairment of right-of-use assets. While we are still evaluating the impact the update will have on our consolidated financial statements, we expect the adoption of Topic 842 will
10
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
result in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities within the consolidated balance sheets, which may be material. Additionally, we do not expect the adoption of Topic 842 to have a material impact on our consolidated statements of operations.
Note 3. Accounts Receivable, Net
The components of accounts receivable, net are as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 56,033 | $ | 44,554 | |||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (1,380 | ) | (1,449 | ) | |||
Allowance for product returns | (2,100 | ) | (2,471 | ) | |||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 52,553 | $ | 40,634 |
For each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of less than $0.1 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a reduction to the provision for doubtful accounts of $0.1 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of less than $0.1 million.
For each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded a reserve for product returns in our hardware and other revenue of $0.2 million, as compared to $0.6 million and $1.1 million for the same periods in the prior year, respectively. Historically, we have not experienced write-offs for uncollectible accounts or sales returns that have differed significantly from our estimates.
Note 4. Inventory, Net
The components of inventory, net are as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Raw materials | $ | 7,140 | $ | 7,484 | |||
Finished goods | 7,578 | 6,693 | |||||
Total inventory, net | $ | 14,718 | $ | 14,177 |
Note 5. Acquisitions
Connect and Piper Business Units from Icontrol Networks, Inc.
On March 8, 2017, in accordance with the asset purchase agreement we entered into with Icontrol Networks, Inc., or Icontrol, on June 23, 2016, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the Connect line of business and all of the outstanding equity interests of the two subsidiaries through which Icontrol conducted its Piper line of business, or the Acquisition. Connect provides an interactive security and home automation platform for service providers. Piper provides an all-in-one video and home automation hub. We expect the addition of new technology infrastructure, talent, key relationships and hardware devices to help accelerate our development of intelligent, data-driven smart residential and commercial property services.
The cash consideration was $148.5 million, after the estimated working capital adjustment, of which $14.5 million was deposited in escrow and was released in accordance with the asset purchase agreement upon the finalization of indemnification obligations of Icontrol stockholders and the final determination of closing working capital. We used $81.5 million of cash on hand and drew $67.0 million under our senior line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, and a syndicate of lenders to fund the Acquisition.
The Acquisition also included non-cash consideration. In accordance with the terms of the asset purchase agreement, we were obligated to assume the Icontrol 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and Icontrol 2003 Stock Plan, or collectively, the Icontrol Plans, and converted the 2,001,387 unvested employee stock options into 70,406 Alarm.com stock options using a conversion ratio stated in the agreement to convert the original exercise price and number of options. The fair value of the unvested stock options on the date of the Acquisition was $1.7 million calculated using a Black-Scholes model with a volatility and risk-free interest rate over the expected term of the options and the closing price of the Alarm.com common stock on the date of acquisition. We applied our graded vesting accounting policy to the fair value of these assumed options and determined $1.4 million of the fair value was attributable to pre-combination services and was included as a component of total purchase consideration. The
11
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
remaining $0.3 million of the fair value was determined to be attributable to post-combination services and will be recognized over the remaining service periods of the stock options.
The following table summarizes the assumptions used for estimating the fair value of stock options assumed from the Connect business unit of Icontrol:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 | ||
Volatility | 42.7 - 44.4% | |
Expected term | 2.5 - 5.0 years | |
Risk-free interest rate | 1.4 - 2.0% | |
Dividend rate | — | % |
The table below sets forth the purchase consideration and the fair value allocation of the tangible and intangible net assets acquired (in thousands):
March 8, 2017 | |||
Calculation of Purchase Consideration: | |||
Cash paid, net of working capital adjustment | $ | 148,500 | |
Assumed stock options | 1,375 | ||
Total consideration | $ | 149,875 | |
Estimated Tangible and Intangible Net Assets: | |||
Cash | $ | 211 | |
Accounts receivable | 11,421 | ||
Current assets | 883 | ||
Long-term assets | 4,446 | ||
Customer relationships | 93,260 | ||
Developed technology | 4,770 | ||
Trade name | 170 | ||
Current liabilities | (1,608 | ) | |
Long-term liabilities | (288 | ) | |
Goodwill | 36,610 | ||
Total estimated tangible and intangible net assets | $ | 149,875 |
Goodwill of $36.6 million reflects the value of acquired workforce and synergies we expect to achieve from integrating support for Connect's security service providers and for the Connect platform. The goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes. We allocated goodwill to reporting units based on expected benefit from our synergies, and have allocated the goodwill to the Alarm.com segment.
The purchase price allocation for the Acquisition was finalized during the third quarter of 2017. The final fair value of the assets and liabilities related to the Acquisition reflects an increase of $0.1 million in tangible assets, net and a decrease of $0.1 million in goodwill based on working capital adjustments identified by us.
Fair Value of Net Assets Acquired and Intangibles
In accordance with ASC 805, the business units acquired in the Acquisition constituted a business and the assets and liabilities were recorded at their respective fair values as of March 8, 2017. We developed our estimate of the fair value of intangible net assets using a multi-period excess earnings method for customer relationships, the relief from royalty method for the developed technology and the relief from royalty method for the trade name.
Customer Relationships
We recorded the customer relationships intangible separately from goodwill based on determination of the length, strength and contractual nature of the relationship that Connect shared with its customers. We valued two groups of customer
12
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
relationships using the multi-period excess earnings method, an income approach. We used several assumptions in the income approach, including attrition and renewal rate, margin and discount rate. We are amortizing the first customer relationship, valued at $92.5 million, on an attribution basis derived from the discounted cash flows of the model over an estimated useful life of twelve years and the second group of customer relationships, valued at $0.8 million, on the same basis, over an estimated useful life of four years.
Developed Technology
Developed technology primarily consists of intellectual property of proprietary software that is marketed for sale. The Connect platform is software for interactive security, automation and related solutions that is typically deployed and operated by the service provider in its own network operations center. We valued the developed technology by applying the relief from royalty method, an income approach. We used several assumptions in the relief from royalty method, which included royalty rate and discount rate. We are amortizing the Connect developed technology, valued at $4.4 million, on an attribution method based on the discounted cash flows of the model over an estimated useful life of three years. Other developed technologies, valued at $0.3 million, were also acquired.
Trade Name
We determined that there was no fair value for the Connect trade name as the largest service provider partner for Connect had re-branded the interactive security and automation platform and marketed it under the service provider partner's own name. We valued the other trade names acquired using a relief from royalty method. We used several assumptions in the income approach, including royalty and discount rates. We are amortizing the other trade names, valued at $0.2 million, on an attribution basis derived from the discounted cash flows of the model over an estimated useful life of three years.
Deferred Tax Asset
The equity interests in the subsidiaries we acquired provided for a carryover tax basis in goodwill and intangible assets that arose from a previous acquisition. We recorded a deferred tax asset of $4.1 million that represents the excess of the carryover tax basis in those previously acquired goodwill and intangible assets over the fair value of goodwill and intangible assets we recorded on the date of the Acquisition.
ObjectVideo
On January 1, 2017, in accordance with an asset purchase agreement, we acquired certain assets of ObjectVideo, Inc., or ObjectVideo, that constituted a business now called ObjectVideo Labs, LLC, or ObjectVideo Labs, including products, technology portfolio and engineering team. ObjectVideo is a pioneer in the fields of video analytics and computer vision with technology that extracts meaning and intelligence from video streams in real-time to enable object tracking, pattern recognition and activity identification. We anticipate that the ObjectVideo Labs engineering team's capabilities and expertise will accelerate our research and development of video services and video analytic applications. In addition, ObjectVideo Labs will continue to perform advanced research and engineering services for the federal government. The consideration included $6.0 million of cash paid at closing.
The table below sets forth the purchase consideration and the fair value allocation of the tangible and intangible net assets acquired (in thousands):
January 1, 2017 | |||
Calculation of Purchase Consideration: | |||
Cash paid, net of working capital adjustment | $ | 6,000 | |
Estimated Tangible and Intangible Net Assets: | |||
Developed technology | $ | 3,800 | |
Current liabilities | (58 | ) | |
Goodwill | 2,258 | ||
Total estimated tangible and intangible net assets | $ | 6,000 |
Goodwill of $2.3 million reflects the value of acquired workforce and expected synergies from pairing ObjectVideo Labs' video analytics capabilities with our offerings. The goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes.
13
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
The purchase price allocation for the ObjectVideo Labs acquisition was finalized during the third quarter of 2017. The final fair value of the assets and liabilities related to the ObjectVideo Labs acquisition reflects an increase of $0.4 million in developed technology and a decrease of $0.4 million in goodwill as well as a corresponding change to amortization of the developed technology based on our use of the replacement cost method to value the developed technology.
Fair Value of Net Assets Acquired and Intangibles
In accordance with ASC 805, the assets and liabilities of ObjectVideo Labs we acquired were recorded at their respective fair values as of January 1, 2017, the date of the acquisition. We developed our estimate of the fair value of intangible assets using the replacement cost method for the developed technology.
Developed Technology
Developed technology recorded separately from goodwill consists of intellectual property such as proprietary software used internally for revenue producing activities. ObjectVideo Labs proprietary software consists of source code and video analytics testing programs used internally to provide video analytics consulting services and research and development to customers and for the SaaS Alarm.com platform. We valued the developed technology by applying the replacement cost method. We used several assumptions in this cost approach, which included analyzing costs that a company would expect to incur to recreate an asset of equivalent utility. We are amortizing the developed technology, valued at $3.8 million, on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of two years which coincides with the rapidly developing technology of video analytics.
Unaudited Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma data is presented as if the Acquisition and ObjectVideo Labs were included in our historical consolidated statements of operations beginning January 1, 2016. These pro forma results do not necessarily represent what would have occurred if all the business combinations had taken place on January 1, 2016, nor do they represent the results that may occur in the future.
This pro forma financial information includes our historical financial statements and those of our business combinations with the following adjustments: (i) we adjusted the pro forma amounts for income taxes, (ii) we applied interest expense as if the additional borrowing for the acquisitions were as of January 1, 2016, (iii) we adjusted for amortization expense assuming the fair value adjustments to intangible assets had been applied beginning January 1, 2016, and (iv) we adjusted for transaction fees incurred and reclassified them to January 1, 2016.
The pro forma adjustments were based on available information and upon assumptions that we believe are reasonable to reflect the impact of these acquisitions on our historical financial information on a supplemental pro forma basis, as follows (in thousands):
Pro Forma Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 | |||
Revenue | $ | 171,252 | |
Net income | 21,445 | ||
Net income per diluted share | $ | 0.44 |
Business Combinations in Operations
The operations of each of the business combinations discussed above were included in the condensed consolidated financial statements as of each of their respective acquisition dates. The following table presents the revenue and earnings of the business combinations in the year of acquisition as reported within the condensed consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 | |||
Revenue | $ | 12,252 | |
Net loss | (3,522 | ) |
For the Acquisition, we included the results of Connect's operations since its acquisition date in the Alarm.com segment and the results of Piper's operations since its acquisition date in the Other segment. We included the results of ObjectVideo Labs operations since its acquisition date in the Alarm.com segment.
14
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Note 6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
The changes in goodwill by reportable segment are outlined below (in thousands):
Alarm.com | Other | Total | |||||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2018 | $ | 63,591 | $ | — | $ | 63,591 | |||||
Goodwill acquired | — | — | — | ||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2018 | $ | 63,591 | $ | — | $ | 63,591 |
There were no impairments of goodwill during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
The following table reflects changes in the net carrying amount of the components of intangible assets (in thousands):
Customer Relationships | Developed Technology | Trade Name | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2018 | $ | 88,526 | $ | 5,532 | $ | 228 | $ | 94,286 | |||||||
Amortization | (5,631 | ) | (1,935 | ) | (51 | ) | (7,617 | ) | |||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2018 | $ | 82,895 | $ | 3,597 | $ | 177 | $ | 86,669 |
We recorded $3.8 million and $7.6 million of amortization related to our intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to $3.5 million and $5.0 million for the same periods in the prior year. There were no impairments of long-lived intangible assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
The following tables reflect the weighted average remaining life and carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets (in thousands):
June 30, 2018 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | Weighted- Average Remaining Life | |||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 103,926 | $ | (21,031 | ) | $ | 82,895 | 10.4 | ||||||
Developed technology | 13,959 | (10,362 | ) | 3,597 | 1.8 | |||||||||
Trade name | 1,084 | (907 | ) | 177 | 2.7 | |||||||||
Other | 234 | (234 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 119,203 | $ | (32,534 | ) | $ | 86,669 |
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | Weighted- Average Remaining Life | |||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 103,926 | $ | (15,400 | ) | $ | 88,526 | 10.8 | ||||||
Developed technology | 13,959 | (8,427 | ) | 5,532 | 2.1 | |||||||||
Trade name | 1,084 | (856 | ) | 228 | 3.3 | |||||||||
Other | 234 | (234 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 119,203 | $ | (24,917 | ) | $ | 94,286 |
15
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Note 7. Other Assets
Patent Licenses
From time to time, we enter into agreements to license patents. The carrying value, net of amortization, was $2.1 million and $2.4 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $0.4 million and $0.5 million of patent licenses were included in other current assets and $1.7 million and $1.9 million of patent licenses were included in other assets, respectively. We have $4.9 million of historical cost in patent licenses related to such agreements. We are amortizing the patent licenses over the estimated useful lives of the patents, which range from 3 years to 11 years. Amortization expense on patent licenses was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the same periods in the prior year, which is included in cost of SaaS and license revenue in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Loan to a Distribution Partner
In September 2016, we entered into dealer and loan agreements with a distribution partner. The dealer agreement enables the distribution partner to resell our SaaS services and hardware to their subscribers. Under the loan agreements, we agreed to loan the distribution partner up to $4.0 million, collateralized by all assets owned by the distribution partner. The advance period for the loan was amended in August 2017 to begin each year on September 1 and end each year on December 31. Interest on the outstanding principal accrued at a rate per annum equal to the greater of 6.0% or the Eurodollar Base Rate, or LIBOR, plus 4.0%, as determined on the first date of each annual advance period. The repayment of principal and accrued interest was due in three installments beginning in July and ending in August following the advance period. The term date of the loan was August 31, 2019; however, the borrower had the option to extend the term of the loan for two successive terms of one year each.
In May 2018, the loan agreement with our distribution partner was amended to convert the entire $4.0 million note receivable outstanding into a $4.0 million term loan. The term loan matures on July 31, 2022 and requires annual principal repayments of $1.0 million on July 31 of each year, commencing on July 31, 2019. The term loan also requires monthly interest payments, with interest accruing on the outstanding principal balance at a rate per annum equal to 6.0% through June 30, 2018 and a rate per annum equal to the LIBOR rate on the first of any interest period plus 7.0% beginning on July 1, 2018. The $4.0 million note receivable balance was included in other assets and other current assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
In April 2017, we entered into a subordinated credit agreement with an affiliated entity of the distribution partner and loaned the affiliated entity $3.0 million, with a maturity date of November 21, 2022. Interest on the outstanding principal balance accrues at a rate of 8.5% per annum and requires monthly interest payments. The $3.0 million loan receivable balance was included in other assets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized $0.5 million and $0.7 million of revenue from the distribution partners associated with these loans, respectively, as compared to $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the same periods in the prior year.
Prepaid Expenses
As of June 30, 2018, $13.3 million of prepaid expenses were included in other current assets and were primarily comprised of prepayments for inventory. As of December 31, 2017, $3.8 million of prepaid expenses were included in other current assets. In April 2018, we made a prepayment of $5.2 million for long lead-time parts related to our inventory.
Note 8. Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis as of June 30, 2018 | |||||||||||||||
Fair value measurements in: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Money market account | $ | 67,089 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 67,089 | |||||||
Total | $ | 67,089 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 67,089 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Subsidiary unit awards | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 389 | $ | 389 | |||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 389 | $ | 389 |
16
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||
Fair value measurements in: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Money market account | $ | 65,620 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 65,620 | |||||||
Total | $ | 65,620 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 65,620 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Subsidiary unit awards | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,160 | $ | 3,160 | |||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,160 | $ | 3,160 |
The following table summarizes the change in fair value of the Level 3 liabilities for subsidiary unit awards with significant unobservable inputs (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Beginning of period balance | $ | 389 | $ | 2,978 | $ | 3,160 | $ | 2,768 | |||||||
Total losses / (gains) included in earnings | — | (66 | ) | 31 | 144 | ||||||||||
Settlements | — | — | (2,802 | ) | — | ||||||||||
End of period balance | $ | 389 | $ | 2,912 | $ | 389 | $ | 2,912 |
The money market account is included in our cash and cash equivalents in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Our money market assets are valued using quoted prices in active markets.
The liability for the subsidiary unit awards relates to agreements established with employees of our subsidiaries for cash awards contingent upon the subsidiary companies meeting certain financial milestones such as revenue, working capital, EBITDA and EBITDA margin. We account for these subsidiary awards using fair value and establish liabilities for the future payment for the repurchase of subsidiary units under the terms of the agreements based on estimating revenue, working capital, EBITDA and EBITDA margin of the subsidiary units over the periods of the awards through the anticipated repurchase dates. We estimated the fair value of each liability by using a Monte Carlo simulation model for determining each of the projected measures by using an expected distribution of potential outcomes. The fair value of each liability is calculated with thousands of projected outcomes, the results of which are averaged and then discounted to estimate the present value. At each reporting date until the respective payment dates, we will remeasure these liabilities, using the same valuation approach based on the applicable subsidiary's revenue, an unobservable input, and we will record any changes in the employee's compensation expense. Some of the awards are subject to the employees' continued employment and therefore recorded on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we settled $2.8 million of the liability related to the subsidiary unit awards. The remaining liability balances are included in either accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities or other liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets (see Note 10).
We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy. Changes in economic conditions or model-based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value level to another. In such instances, the transfer is reported at the beginning of the reporting period. There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. We also monitor the value of the investments for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. No other-than-temporary impairments occurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
17
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Note 9. Liabilities
The components of accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 21,519 | $ | 17,008 | |||
Accrued expenses | 7,562 | 4,301 | |||||
Subsidiary unit awards | 225 | 2,802 | |||||
Other current liabilities | 2,824 | 4,973 | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 32,130 | $ | 29,084 |
The components of other liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Deferred rent | $ | 11,783 | $ | 12,279 | |||
Other liabilities | 1,658 | 1,646 | |||||
Other liabilities | $ | 13,441 | $ | 13,925 |
Note 10. Debt, Commitments and Contingencies
The debt, commitments and contingencies described below would require us, or our subsidiaries, to make payments to third parties under certain circumstances.
Debt
On October 6, 2017, we entered into a $125.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, or the 2017 Facility, with SVB, as administrative agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as documentation agent, and a syndicate of lenders. Upon entry into the 2017 Facility, we borrowed $72.0 million, which was used to repay the previously outstanding balance under our previous credit facility. The 2017 Facility matures in October 2022 and includes an option to further increase the borrowing capacity to $175.0 million with the consent of the lenders. Costs incurred in connection with the 2017 Facility were capitalized and are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the 2017 Facility. The 2017 Facility is secured by substantially all of our assets, including our intellectual property. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we repaid $1.0 million and $2.0 million of the outstanding balance of the 2017 Facility, respectively, as compared to $1.0 million repaid during the same periods in the prior year.
The outstanding principal balance on the 2017 Facility accrues interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either (1) LIBOR, plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio, or (2) the highest of (a) the Wall Street Journal prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00% plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we elected for the outstanding principal balance to accrue interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%, LIBOR plus 1.75%, LIBOR plus 2.00%, and LIBOR plus 2.50% when our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 1.00:1.00, greater than or equal to 1.00:1.00 but less than 2.00:1.00, greater than or equal to 2.00:1.00 but less than 3.00:1.00 and greater than or equal to 3.00:1.00, respectively. The 2017 Facility also carries an unused line commitment fee of 0.20%. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the effective interest rate on the credit facilities was 4.00%, as compared to 4.65% for the same period in the prior year.
The carrying value of the 2017 Facility was $69.0 million and $71.0 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The 2017 Facility includes a variable interest rate that approximates market rates and, as such, we classified the liability as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and determined that the carrying amount of the 2017 Facility approximated its fair value as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The 2017 Facility contains various financial and other covenants that require us to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 3.50:1.00 and a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.25:1.00. As of June 30, 2018, we were in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants and there were no events of default.
18
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Commitments and Contingencies
Repurchase of Subsidiary Units
In 2011, we formed a subsidiary that offers to professional residential property management and vacation rental management companies technology solutions for remote monitoring and control of properties, including access control and energy management. Since its formation, we granted an award of subsidiary stock to the founder and president. The vesting of the award is based upon the subsidiary meeting certain minimum financial targets from the date of commercial availability, which was determined to be June 1, 2013, until the fourth anniversary. In 2016, we amended the term of the award, extending the valuation date for the first payment in cash to December 31, 2017, amending the financial targets and allowing for payments in cash based on the future collection of financed customer receivables from 2018 to 2020 that existed as of the valuation date. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we settled $2.8 million of the liability related to the subsidiary unit awards. We recorded a liability of $0.2 million in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $0.2 million in other liabilities related to this commitment in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018. We recorded a liability of $2.8 million in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities and a liability of $0.4 million in other liabilities related to this commitment in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
At each reporting date until the respective payment dates, we will remeasure these liabilities, and we will record any changes in fair value in general and administrative expense (see Note 8).
Leases
We lease office space and office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through 2026. We recognize rent expense for lease payments on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term and amortize tenant improvement allowances over the term of the lease. In August 2014, we signed a lease for new office space in Tysons, Virginia, where we relocated our headquarters in February 2016. The lease term ends in 2026 and includes a five-year renewal option, an $8.0 million tenant improvement allowance and scheduled rent increases. During 2016, we entered into amendments to this lease which provided for 30,662 square feet of additional office space and an additional $1.7 million in tenant improvement allowance. We took possession of the additional space in February 2017 and we were allowed to utilize the tenant improvement allowance for design prior to moving into the space. The entire $9.7 million tenant improvement allowance was utilized as of December 31, 2017.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, rent expense was $1.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively, as compared to $1.6 million and $2.9 million for the same periods in the prior year.
Indemnification Agreements
We have various agreements that may obligate us to indemnify the other party to the agreement with respect to certain matters. Generally, these indemnification provisions are included in contracts arising in the normal course of business. Although we cannot predict the maximum potential amount of future payments that may become due under these indemnification agreements, we do not believe any potential liability that might arise from such indemnity provisions is probable or material.
Letters of Credit
As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had no outstanding letters of credit under our 2017 Facility.
Legal Proceedings
On June 2, 2015, Vivint, Inc., or Vivint, filed a lawsuit against us in U.S. District Court, District of Utah, alleging that our technology directly and indirectly infringes six patents that Vivint purchased. Vivint is seeking permanent injunctions, enhanced damages and attorneys' fees. We answered the complaint on July 23, 2015. Among other things, we asserted defenses based on non-infringement and invalidity of the patents in question. On August 19, 2016, the U.S. District Court, District of Utah stayed the litigation pending inter partes review, or IPR, by the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board, or PTAB, of five of the patents in suit. In March 2017, the PTAB issued final written decisions relating to two patents finding all challenged claims unpatentable. In May 2017, the PTAB issued final written decisions relating to the remaining patents that found certain claims unpatentable, while certain other claims were not found to be unpatentable. Vivint has appealed the decisions to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and we have cross-appealed. The U.S. District Court, District of Utah lifted the stay on the litigation on June 26, 2017, and Vivint is proceeding with its case on four of the six patents in its complaint. Fact discovery is scheduled to close on or about August 31, 2018, and no trial date has been set. In September 2017, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered ex parte reexaminations of certain claims of two of the remaining patents in suit, at our request. On July 13, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s March 2017 decision, which invalidated all challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,884,713.
19
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Should Vivint prevail on its claims that one or more elements of our solution infringe one or more of its patents, we could be required to pay damages of Vivint’s lost profits and/or a reasonable royalty for sales of our solution, enjoined from making, using and selling our solution if a license or other right to continue selling such elements is not made available to us or we are unable to design around such patents, and required to pay ongoing royalties and comply with unfavorable terms if such a license is made available to us. The outcome of the legal claim and proceeding against us cannot be predicted with certainty. We believe we have valid defenses to Vivint’s claims. Based on currently available information, we determined a loss is not probable or reasonably estimable at this time.
On December 30, 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against us in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA. The complaint does not allege that Alarm.com itself violated the TCPA, but instead seeks to hold us responsible for the marketing activities of our service provider partners under principles of agency and vicarious liability. Specifically, the plaintiffs seek to hold us liable for telemarketing calls made by one of our service providers, as well as calls made by one of its sub-dealer agents, that purportedly violated the TCPA’s provisions concerning use of Automatic Telephone Dialing Systems (“ATDS”) and placing calls to numbers listed on the national Do-Not-Call (“DNC”) registry. The complaint seeks monetary damages under the TCPA, injunctive relief, and other relief, including attorneys' fees. On May 5, 2017, the court granted plaintiffs' motion for class certification, and certified two plaintiff classes: a DNC class and an ATDS class. Plaintiffs claim that 393,762 individuals received 3,002,373 telephone calls in violation of the TCPA’s DNC-related provisions, and that 22,055 individuals received 119,484 telephone calls in violation of the TCPA’s ATDS-related provisions. Discovery is closed, and the matter remains pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The court has denied the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and based on the current schedule, we anticipate a trial will take place in October 2018.
The outcome of this legal claim and proceeding against us cannot be predicted with certainty. While we believe we have valid defenses to plaintiffs’ claims, a negative outcome could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. If plaintiffs’ claims are successful, a jury could award damages of up to $500 per telephone call made to class members on the Do Not Call Registry. Calls made in violation of the ATDS-related provisions are subject to statutory damages of $500 per call. Both ATDS- and DNC-related damages may be trebled if the violations are found to be knowing or willful. Should we decide to appeal an adverse verdict, we would be required to post a bond in the amount of that verdict to stay execution of the judgment while the appeal is pending, which may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. Based on currently available information, we determined a loss is not reasonably estimable at this time.
On August 14, 2017, Alarm.com filed a lawsuit against ABS Capital Partners, Inc., ABS Partners V, LLC, ABS Partners VII, LLC, and Ralph Terkowitz in the Delaware Court of Chancery, or the Chancery Court. The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief preventing the defendants from using Alarm.com’s confidential information and trade secrets to compete with Alarm.com, and preventing the defendants from executing their planned transaction to invest in two companies (ipDatatel, LLC, or ipDatatel, and Resolution Products, Inc., or Resolution Products). The complaint alleged claims of breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of trade secrets, and misappropriation of confidential information, in connection with the defendants’ planned investment. On September 22, 2017, Alarm.com filed an amended complaint against ABS Capital Partners, Inc., ABS Partners V, LLC, and ABS Partners VII, LLC, alleging claims for misappropriation of trade secrets and misappropriation of confidential information. The amended complaint seeks damages, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief enjoining ABS Capital Partners, Inc., ABS Partners V, LLC, and ABS Partners VII, LLC from using Alarm.com’s trade secrets and confidential information to compete with Alarm.com. On October 6, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. On June 15, 2018, the Chancery Court dismissed our complaint. On July 13, 2018, Alarm.com filed a Notice of Appeal with the Delaware Supreme Court.
On August 24, 2017, Alarm.com Incorporated and its wholly owned subsidiary ICN Acquisition, LLC, filed a patent infringement complaint against ipDatatel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The parties subsequently stipulated to transfer the case to the Southern District of Texas. The complaint seeks injunctive relief to stop the further sale of the infringing ipDatatel’s products and systems, and damages for the infringement of Alarm.com’s patents. The complaint asserts that the technology in the ipDatatel products infringe one or more claims of Alarm.com’s patents: United States Patent Numbers 7,113,090; 7,633,385; 7,956,736; 8,478,871; and 9,141,276. If the litigation is successful, Alarm.com will be entitled to receive monetary damages, injunctive relief, and any other relief, including attorneys' fees, from ipDatatel. The Court has scheduled a claim construction hearing for September 2018 and commencement of trial in August 2019. ipDatatel has not yet answered the complaint or asserted counterclaims and defenses. ipDatatel's motion for dismissal based on alleged patent ineligibility as to each patent in suit was denied without prejudice. On July 26, 2018, ipDatatel answered the complaint by denying the patent infringement allegations and asserting several affirmative defenses, including invalidity and unenforceability. ipDatatel also asserted antitrust counterclaims based on alleged inequitable conduct in connection with the prosecution of one or more patents-in-suit.
On April 25, 2017, Alarm.com Incorporated and its wholly owned subsidiary ICN Acquisition, LLC, filed a patent infringement complaint against Protect America, Inc., or Protect America, and SecureNet Technologies, LLC, or SecureNet, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The complaint seeks injunctive relief to stop the further sale of the
20
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
infringing Protect America and SecureNet products and systems, and damages for the infringement of Alarm.com’s patents. The complaint asserts that the technology in the Protect America and SecureNet Alarm Systems products infringe one or more claims of Alarm.com’s patents: United States Patent Numbers 7,113,090; 7,633,385; 8,395,494; 8,493,202; 8,612,591; 8,860,804; and 9,141,276. If the litigation is successful, Alarm.com will be entitled to receive monetary damages, injunctive relief, and any other relief, including attorneys' fees, from Protect America and SecureNet. In June 2017, Alarm.com filed an amended complaint against Protect America only and voluntarily dismissed SecureNet from the suit, reserving the right to refile. In September 2017, Alarm.com voluntarily dismissed the amended complaint in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia and refiled a complaint against Protect America, with substantially the same allegations, in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas. Protect America has not yet answered the complaint or asserted counterclaims and defenses. Protect America has moved for dismissal or transfer to the Western District of Texas based on allegedly improper venue. The parties subsequently stipulated to transfer the case to the Western District of Texas. The Court has not yet entered a scheduling order.
In September 2014, Icontrol filed a Complaint in the United States District Court, District of Delaware, asserting that SecureNet infringes certain U.S. Patents owned by Icontrol, patents now owned by Alarm.com through a subsidiary. In March 2015, Icontrol voluntarily agreed to dismiss the case, reserving the right to refile. In September 2015, Icontrol refiled the case against SecureNet in the same district court alleging infringement of some of the same patents. SecureNet filed petitions for inter partes review of the patents-in-suit before the PTAB. Proceedings as to one of the patents in suit (United States Patent Number 7,855,635) was instituted, resulting in the cancellation of some, but not all, claims of that patent. That decision is currently before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The PTAB has rejected the remaining applications for inter partes review, and SecureNet requested rehearing of the rejection as to one of the patents in suit, which request has been rejected by the PTAB. In April 2018, the Court issued an order construing certain patent claim terms. The Court has scheduled commencement of trial in February 2019.
On March 29, 2018, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against us by Nick Fisher in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging violations of the TCPA, and the Telemarketing And Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, or TCFAPA. The complaint alleges that Alarm.com and another defendant, Nortek Security & Control LLC, violated the TCPA and TCFAPA through purportedly unauthorized telephone calls to Fisher, and seeks to hold us responsible for the alleged calls, including under principles of agency and vicarious liability. The complaint seeks monetary damages under the TCPA and TCFAPA, injunctive relief, and other relief, including attorneys' fees. We answered the complaint and filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on June 18, 2018. The matter remains pending. Based on currently available information, we determined a loss is not probable or reasonably estimable at this time.
In addition, we may be a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business.
Other than the preceding matters, we are not a party to any lawsuit or proceeding that, in the opinion of management, is reasonably possible or probable of having a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We reserve for contingent liabilities based on ASC 450, “Contingencies,” when it is determined that a liability, inclusive of defense costs, is probable and reasonably estimable. Litigation is subject to many factors that are difficult to predict, so there can be no assurance that, in the event of a material unfavorable result in one or more claims, we will not incur material costs.
21
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Note 11. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense is included in the following line items in the condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 319 | $ | 65 | $ | 554 | $ | 178 | |||||||
General and administrative | 1,481 | 755 | 2,509 | 1,324 | |||||||||||
Research and development | 1,744 | 1,095 | 3,150 | 1,726 | |||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 3,544 | $ | 1,915 | $ | 6,213 | $ | 3,228 |
The following table summarizes the components of non-cash stock-based compensation expense (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Stock options and assumed options | $ | 1,088 | $ | 1,083 | $ | 1,816 | $ | 2,066 | |||||||
Restricted stock units | 2,415 | 805 | 4,315 | 1,093 | |||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | — | — | 1 | 19 | |||||||||||
Employee stock purchase plan | 41 | 27 | 81 | 50 | |||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 3,544 | $ | 1,915 | $ | 6,213 | $ | 3,228 | |||||||
Tax benefit from stock-based awards | $ | 3,492 | $ | 4,369 | $ | 3,941 | $ | 5,586 |
We granted an aggregate of 148,500 and 176,500 stock options pursuant to our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, or 2015 Plan, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to an aggregate of 181,400 and 237,550 stock options for the same periods in the prior year. There were 381,119 and 439,864 stock options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to 397,171 and 520,097 stock options for the same periods in the prior year. We granted an aggregate of 164,522 and 212,170 restricted stock units during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to an aggregate of 218,350 and 327,200 restricted stock units for the same periods in the prior year. There were 13,546 restricted stock units exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. There were no restricted stock units exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
22
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Note 12. Earnings Per Share
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
The components of basic and diluted earnings per share, or EPS, are as follows (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,733 | $ | 9,865 | $ | 21,248 | $ | 13,828 | |||||||
Less: income allocated to participating securities | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders (A) | $ | 10,732 | $ | 9,860 | $ | 21,244 | $ | 13,820 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic (B) | 47,439,311 | 46,442,327 | 47,333,435 | 46,334,499 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options, RSUs and RSAs | 2,057,777 | 2,558,226 | 2,073,009 | 2,572,313 | |||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted (C) | 49,497,088 | 49,000,553 | 49,406,444 | 48,906,812 | |||||||||||
Net income per share: | |||||||||||||||
Basic (A/B) | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
Diluted (A/C) | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.28 |
The following securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding as the inclusion of these securities would have an anti-dilutive effect:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Stock options | 191,050 | 313,650 | 316,217 | 313,650 | |||||||
RSAs | 23 | 1,082 | 23 | 1,082 | |||||||
RSUs | 12,772 | — | 29,772 | 148,100 | |||||||
Common stock subject to repurchase | 7,052 | 21,317 | 7,052 | 21,317 |
Participating securities are composed of certain stock options granted under the 2015 Plan, and previously granted under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, that may be exercised before the options have vested. Unvested shares have a non-forfeitable right to dividends. Unvested shares issued as a result of early exercise are subject to repurchase by us upon termination of employment or services at the original exercise price. The common stock subject to repurchase is no longer classified as participating securities when shares revert to common stock outstanding as the awards vest and our repurchase right lapses.
Note 13. Significant Service Providers
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, our 10 largest revenue service provider partners accounted for 57% and 58% of our revenue, respectively, as compared to 61% for the same periods in the prior year. One of our service provider partners within the Alarm.com segment individually represented greater than 15% but not more than 20% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. One of our service provider partners within the Alarm.com segment individually represented greater than 10% but not more than 15% of our revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017. One of our service provider partners within the Alarm.com segment individually represented greater than 15% but not more than 20% of our revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017. Two of our service provider partners within the Alarm.com segment individually represented greater than 10% but not more than 15% of our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
One individual service provider partner in the Alarm.com segment represented more than 10% of accounts receivable as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
23
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Note 14. Income Taxes
For purposes of interim reporting, our annual effective income tax rate is estimated in accordance with ASC 740-270, "Interim Reporting." This rate is applied to the pre-tax book income of the entities expected to be benefited during the year. Discrete items that impact the tax provision are recorded in the period incurred.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act, was signed into law on December 22, 2017. This legislation made significant changes in U.S. tax law, including a reduction in the corporate tax rate, changes to net operating loss carryforwards and carrybacks and a repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax. The legislation reduced the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. As a result of the enacted Tax Act, we were required to revalue deferred tax assets and liabilities at the rate in effect when the deferred tax balances are scheduled to reverse. This revaluation resulted in an additional $8.8 million of income tax expense and a corresponding reduction in the deferred tax asset which was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Additionally, on December 22, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, or SAB 118, to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. Specifically, SAB 118 provides a measurement period for companies to evaluate the impacts of the Tax Act on their financial statements. We consider the $8.8 million of income tax expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017 to be a provisional amount primarily because we continue to evaluate the tax effects of the Tax Act on taxes related to our international operations, the realizability of deferred tax assets, remeasurement of certain temporary differences at the new tax rates and the impact of other retroactive provisions. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, no adjustments were made to the provisional amounts previously recognized.
Our effective income tax rates were (31.2)% and (6.8)% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to (84.1)% and (40.2)% for the same periods in the prior year. Our effective tax rates were below the statutory rate primarily due to the tax windfall benefits from employee stock-based payment transactions as well as research and development tax credits claimed, partially offset by the impact of non-deductible meal and entertainment expenses.
We recognize a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, both positive and negative, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on our historical and expected future taxable earnings, we believe it is more likely than not that we will realize all of the benefit of the existing deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Accordingly, we have not recorded a valuation allowance as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
We apply guidance for uncertainty in income taxes that requires the application of a more likely than not threshold to the recognition and de-recognition of uncertain tax positions. If the recognition threshold is met, this guidance permits us to recognize a tax benefit measured at the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in our judgment, is more likely than not to be realized upon settlement. We recorded an unrecognized tax benefit of less than $0.1 million for research and development tax credits claimed during the six months ended June 30, 2018. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded interest for the period on prior year research and development tax credits we claimed. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had accrued less than $0.1 million of total interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.
Note 15. Segment Information
We have two reportable segments:
• | Alarm.com segment |
• | Other segment |
Our chief operating decision maker is our chief executive officer. Management determined the operational data used by the chief operating decision maker is that of the two reportable segments. Management bases strategic goals and decisions on these segments and the data presented below is used to measure financial results.
Our Alarm.com segment represents our cloud-based platforms for the intelligently connected property and related solutions that contributed approximately 93% and 94% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to approximately 94% for the same periods in the prior year. Our Other segment is focused on researching, developing and offering residential and commercial automation solutions and energy management products and services in adjacent markets. Inter-segment revenue includes sales of hardware between our segments.
24
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
Management evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on operating income (loss) as compared to prior periods and current performance levels. The reportable segment operational data is presented in the table below (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Alarm.com | Other | Intersegment Alarm.com | Intersegment Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | $ | 68,076 | $ | 2,892 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 70,968 | |||||||||
Hardware and other revenue | 30,602 | 5,508 | (1,459 | ) | (1,131 | ) | 33,520 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | 98,678 | 8,400 | (1,459 | ) | (1,131 | ) | 104,488 | ||||||||||||
Operating income / (loss) | 9,427 | (930 | ) | (152 | ) | 165 | 8,510 | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||
Alarm.com | Other | Intersegment Alarm.com | Intersegment Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | $ | 57,109 | $ | 1,819 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 58,928 | |||||||||
Hardware and other revenue | 24,229 | 3,616 | (497 | ) | (288 | ) | 27,060 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | 81,338 | 5,435 | (497 | ) | (288 | ) | 85,988 | ||||||||||||
Operating income / (loss) | 8,819 | (2,994 | ) | (39 | ) | 110 | 5,896 | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Alarm.com | Other | Intersegment Alarm.com | Intersegment Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | $ | 133,738 | $ | 5,218 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 138,956 | |||||||||
Hardware and other revenue | 53,603 | 9,164 | (2,241 | ) | (2,238 | ) | 58,288 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | 187,341 | 14,382 | (2,241 | ) | (2,238 | ) | 197,244 | ||||||||||||
Operating income / (loss) | 23,929 | (3,467 | ) | (235 | ) | 276 | 20,503 | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||
Alarm.com | Other | Intersegment Alarm.com | Intersegment Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | $ | 105,990 | $ | 3,164 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 109,154 | |||||||||
Hardware and other revenue | 45,860 | 6,723 | (1,145 | ) | (410 | ) | 51,028 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | 151,850 | 9,887 | (1,145 | ) | (410 | ) | 160,182 | ||||||||||||
Operating income / (loss) | 15,403 | (5,207 | ) | (60 | ) | 245 | 10,381 | ||||||||||||
Alarm.com | Other | Intersegment Alarm.com | Intersegment Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
Assets as of June 30, 2018 | $ | 444,614 | $ | 18,374 | $ | (60,189 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 402,796 | |||||||
Assets as of December 31, 2017 | 405,915 | 19,144 | (53,267 | ) | (151 | ) | 371,641 |
Our SaaS and license revenue for the Alarm.com segment included software license revenue of $10.2 million and $20.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to $8.5 million and $10.8 million for the same periods in the prior year. There was no software license revenue recorded for the Other segment during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
Depreciation and amortization expense was $5.2 million and $10.1 million for the Alarm.com segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to $4.8 million and $7.6 million for the same periods in the prior year. Depreciation and amortization expense was $0.1 million for the Other segment for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. Additions to property and equipment were $3.2 million and $6.2 million for the Alarm.com segment for
25
ALARM.COM HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
June 30, 2018 and 2017
the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to $3.2 million and $5.0 million for the same periods in the prior year. Additions to property and equipment were less than $0.1 million for the Other segment for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to less than $0.1 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
We derived substantially all revenue from North America for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. Substantially all our long-lived assets were in North America as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
Note 16. Related Party Transactions
Installation Partner
Our installation partner in which we have a 48.2% ownership interest performs installation services for security dealers and also provides installation services for us and certain of our subsidiaries. We account for this investment using the equity method. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, our investment balance in our installation partner was zero. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million of cost of hardware and other revenue in connection with this installation partner, respectively, as compared to $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the same periods in the prior year. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the accounts payable balance to our installation partner was less than $0.1 million. In September 2014, we loaned $0.3 million to our installation partner under a secured promissory note that accrues interest at 8.0%. Interest is payable monthly with the entire principal balance plus accrued but unpaid interest due at maturity in September 2018. We recorded less than $0.1 million of interest income related to this note receivable in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
26
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with (1) our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and (2) the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 filed on February 28, 2018 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These statements are often identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “would” or the negative or plural of these words or similar expressions or variations and such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to our outlook; the impact of new accounting standards; our business strategy, plans and objectives for future operations; continued enhancements of our platform and new product offerings and our future financial and business performance. The events described in these forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, filings. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Overview
Alarm.com is the leading platform for the intelligently connected property. We offer a comprehensive suite of cloud-based solutions for smart residential and commercial properties, including interactive security, video monitoring, intelligent automation, energy management and wellness solutions. Millions of property owners rely on our technology to intelligently secure, monitor and manage their residential and commercial properties. In the last year alone, our platforms processed more than 100 billion data points generated by over 80 million connected devices. We believe that this scale of subscribers, connected devices and data operations makes us the leader in the connected property market.
Our solutions are delivered through an established network of over 7,000 trusted service providers, who are experts at selling, installing and supporting our solutions. We primarily generate Software-as-a-Service, or SaaS, and license revenue through our service provider partners, who resell these services and pay us monthly fees. Our service provider partners have indicated that they typically have three to five-year service contracts with residential and commercial property owners who use our solutions. We also generate hardware and other revenue, primarily from our service provider partners and distributors. Our hardware sales include gateway modules and other connected devices that enable our services, such as video cameras and smart thermostats. We believe that the length of service contracts with residential and commercial property owners, combined with our robust platforms and over 15 years of operating experience, contribute to a compelling business model.
Our technology platforms are designed to make connected properties safer, smarter and more efficient. Our solutions are used in both smart residential and commercial properties, which we refer to as the connected property market and we have designed our technology platforms for all market participants. This includes not only the residential and commercial property owners who subscribe to our services, but also the hardware partners who manufacture devices that integrate with our platforms and the service provider partners who install and maintain our solutions.
Our service provider partners can deploy our interactive security, video monitoring, intelligent automation and energy management solutions as stand-alone offerings or as combined solutions to address the needs of a broad range of customers. Our technology enables subscribers to seamlessly connect to their property through our family of mobile apps, websites, and new engagement platforms like voice control through Amazon Echo, wearable devices like the Apple Watch, and TV platforms such as Apple TV and Amazon Fire TV.
Highlights of Second Quarter Results
We primarily generate SaaS and license revenue, our largest source of revenue, through our service provider partners who resell our services and pay us monthly fees. Our service provider partners sell, install and support Alarm.com solutions that enable residential and commercial property owners to intelligently secure, connect, control and automate their properties. Our service provider partners have indicated that they typically have three to five-year service contracts with residential or commercial property owners. Our subscribers consist of all of the properties maintained by those residential and commercial property owners to which we are delivering at least one of our solutions. We derive a portion of our revenue from licensing our intellectual property to third parties on a per customer basis. SaaS and license revenue represented 68% and 70% of our revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to 69% and 68% in the same periods in the prior year.
27
We also generate software license revenue from monthly fees charged to service providers on a per subscriber basis for access to our Connect platform. The Connect software for interactive security, automation and related solutions is typically deployed and operated by the service provider in its own network operations center. Our software license revenue is included within our SaaS and license revenue. Software license revenue represented 10% of our revenue during each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to 10% and 7%, respectively, in the same periods in the prior year.
We also generate revenue from the sale of hardware, including cellular radio modules, video cameras, image sensors, thermostats and other peripherals, that enables our solutions. We have a rich history of innovation in cellular technology that enables our robust SaaS offering. Hardware and other revenue represented 32% and 30% of our revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to 31% and 32%, respectively, in the same periods in the prior year.
We believe there is significant opportunity to expand our international business, as 2% percent of our total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2018 originated from customers located outside of North America. Our products are currently localized and available in 37 countries outside of North America.
Highlights of our financial performance for the periods covered in this Quarterly Report include:
• | SaaS and license revenue increased 20% to $71.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018 from $58.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017. SaaS and license revenue increased 27% to $139.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $109.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017. Included in SaaS and license revenue was software license revenue, which increased to $10.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018 from $8.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017. Software license revenue increased to $20.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $10.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017. |
• | Revenue increased 22% to $104.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018 from $86.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017. Revenue increased 23% to $197.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $160.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017. |
• | Net income was $10.7 million and $9.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Net income was $21.2 million and $13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
• | Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measurement of operating performance, increased to $23.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018 from $15.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017. Adjusted EBITDA increased to $46.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $30.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017. |
Please see Non-GAAP Measures below in this section of this Quarterly Report for a discussion of the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure) and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most comparable measurement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
Other Business Metrics
We regularly monitor a number of financial and operating metrics in order to measure our current performance and estimate our future performance. Our other business metrics may be calculated in a manner different than similar other business metrics used by other companies and include the following (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | $ | 70,968 | $ | 58,928 | $ | 138,956 | $ | 109,154 | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 23,409 | 15,881 | 46,367 | 29,984 | |||||||||||
Twelve Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue renewal rate | 94 | % | 93 | % |
28
SaaS and License Revenue
We believe that SaaS and license revenue is an indicator of the productivity of our existing service provider partners and their ability to activate and maintain subscribers using our intelligently connected property solutions, our ability to add new service provider partners reselling our solutions, the demand for our intelligently connected property solutions and the pace at which the market for these solutions is growing.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA represents our net income before interest expense, other income, net, amortization and depreciation expense, stock-based compensation expense, acquisition-related expense and legal costs and settlement fees incurred in connection with non-ordinary course litigation and other disputes, particularly costs involved in ongoing intellectual property litigation. We do not consider these items to be indicative of our core operating performance. The non-cash items include amortization and depreciation expense and stock-based compensation expense. We do not adjust for ordinary course legal expenses resulting from maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property portfolio and license agreements.
Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure that our management uses to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends to generate future operating plans, to make strategic decisions regarding the allocation of capital, and to make investments in initiatives that are focused on cultivating new markets for our solutions. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating Adjusted EBITDA facilitates comparisons of our operating performance on a period-to-period basis and, in the case of exclusion of acquisition-related adjustments and certain historical legal expenses, excludes items that we do not consider to be indicative of our core operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Please see Non-GAAP Measures in this section for a discussion of the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most comparable GAAP measurement, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
SaaS and License Revenue Renewal Rate
We measure our SaaS and license revenue renewal rate on a trailing 12-month basis by dividing (a) the total SaaS and license revenue recognized during the trailing 12-month period from our subscribers on our Alarm.com platform who were subscribers on the first day of the period, by (b) total SaaS and license revenue we would have recognized during the period from those same subscribers assuming no terminations, or service level upgrades or downgrades. The SaaS and license revenue renewal rate represents both residential and commercial properties. Our SaaS and license revenue renewal rate is expressed as an annualized percentage. Our service provider partners, who resell our services to our subscribers, have indicated that they typically have three to five-year service contracts with our subscribers. Our SaaS and license revenue renewal rate is calculated across our entire subscriber base on the Alarm.com platform, including subscribers whose contract with their service provider reached the end of its contractual term during the measurement period, as well as subscribers whose contract with their service provider has not reached the end of its contractual term during the measurement period, and is not intended to estimate the rate at which our subscribers renew their contracts with our service provider partners. We believe that our SaaS and license revenue renewal rate allows us to measure our ability to retain and grow our SaaS and license revenue and serves as an indicator of the lifetime value of our subscriber base.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
In May 2014, the Financing Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, and International Accounting Standards Board jointly issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," a new revenue recognition standard that provides a framework for addressing revenue issues, improves the comparability of revenue recognition practices across industries, provides useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements and simplifies the presentation of financial statements. On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 by applying the modified retrospective transition method to all of our contracts. Comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the periods presented.
The adoption of Topic 606 did not have a material impact on our revenue recognition policies, however, as a result of adopting the new standard, we changed our treatment of commissions paid to employees, which we previously expensed as incurred. Under the new standard, we capitalize a portion of our commission costs as an incremental cost of obtaining a contract and amortize our commission costs over a period of three years, which is consistent with the period over which the products and services related to the commission are transferred to the customer. Based on the results of our evaluation, the adoption of Topic 606 did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. Additionally, the cumulative effect to the opening balance sheet on January 1, 2018 from the adoption of Topic 606 was not material.
29
Components of Operating Results
Our fiscal year ends on December 31. The key elements of our operating results include:
Revenue
We derive our revenue from three primary sources: the sale of cloud-based SaaS services on our integrated Alarm.com platform, the sale of licenses and services on the Connect software platform and the sale of hardware products. We sell our platform and hardware solutions to service provider partners that resell our solutions and hardware to residential and commercial property owners, who are the service provider partners’ customers.
SaaS and License Revenue. We generate the majority of our SaaS and license revenue primarily from monthly fees charged to our service provider partners sold on a per subscriber basis for access to our cloud-based intelligently connected property platform and related solutions. Our fees per subscriber vary based upon the service plan and features utilized.
Under the terms of our contractual arrangements with our service provider partners, we bill a monthly fee to our service provider partners in advance of the month of service, with the exception of the initial partial month of service, which is paid in arrears. Due to the limited period of time between receipt of payment and delivery of service, we have not accounted for these advance payments as significant financing components. We typically transfer the promised SaaS services to our customers over time, which is evidenced by the fact that the customers receive and consume the benefits provided by our performance of the services as such services are rendered. As a result, we recognize revenue from SaaS services on a monthly basis as we satisfy our performance obligations. We have demonstrated that we can sell our SaaS offering on a stand-alone basis, as it can be sold separately from hardware and activation services. As there is neither a minimum required initial service term nor a stated renewal term in our contractual arrangements, we recognize revenue over the period of service, which is monthly. Our service provider partners typically incur and pay the same monthly fee per subscriber account for the entire period a subscriber account is active.
We offer multiple service level packages for our platform solutions including a range of solutions and a range of a la carte add-ons for additional features. The fee paid by our service provider partners each month for the delivery of our solutions is based on the combination of packages and add-ons enabled for each subscriber. We utilize tiered pricing plans where our service provider partners may receive prospective pricing discounts driven by volume.
We also generate SaaS and license revenue from the fees paid to us when we license our intellectual property to third parties for use of our patents. We bill a monthly fee to third parties based on the number of customers that were active during the prior month. We apply the usage-based royalty exception to recognize license revenue because the sole or predominant item to which the royalty relates is the license of intellectual property. Under the usage-based royalty exception, we recognize revenue on a monthly basis over the period of service. In addition, in certain markets our EnergyHub subsidiary sells its demand response service for an annual service fee, with pricing based on the number of subscribers or amount of aggregate electricity demand made available for a utility’s or market’s control.
Software License Revenue. Our SaaS and license revenue also includes our software license revenue from monthly fees charged to service providers sold on a per subscriber basis for access to our Connect software platform. The Connect software for interactive security, automation and related solutions is typically deployed and operated by the service provider in its own network operations center. Our agreements for the Connect platform solution typically include software and services, such as post-contract customer support, or PCS. Software sales that include multiple elements are typically allocated to the various elements using the relative stand-alone selling price method. We apply the usage-based royalty exception to recognize license revenue associated with software hosted by our customers because the predominant item to which the royalty relates is the license of intellectual property. Under the usage-based royalty exception, we recognize revenue on a monthly basis over the period during which the services are expected to be performed. Under the terms of our contractual arrangements with our service provider partners, we are entitled to payment of a monthly fee that is billed per subscriber for the month of service.
Hardware and Other Revenue. We generate hardware and other revenue primarily from the sale of video cameras and cellular radio modules that provide access to our cloud-based platforms and, to a lesser extent, the sale of other devices, including image sensors and peripherals. We primarily transfer hardware to our customers upon delivery to the customer, which corresponds with the time at which the customer obtains legal title to the hardware. As a result, we recognize hardware and other revenue as we satisfy our performance obligations, which occurs when the hardware is received by our service provider partner or distributor, net of a reserve for estimated returns. There are a few contracts in which we provide shipping and handling services to the customer after control of the hardware transfers to the customer. In these instances, we have elected to account for shipping and handling costs as activities performed to fulfill the promise to transfer hardware to the customer and not as a separate promised service.
30
Amounts due from the sale of hardware are payable in accordance with the terms of our agreements with our service provider partners or distributors, and are not contingent on resale to end-users, or to service provider partners in the case of sales of hardware to distributors. Payment for our hardware is typically due within 30 days from shipment, with the exception of certain hardware finance arrangements, which are paid over a 36-month period. Our terms for hardware sales sold directly to either service provider partners or distributors typically allow for the return of hardware up to one year past the date of sale. Our distributors sell directly to our service provider partners under terms between the two parties.
When determining the amount of consideration we expect to be entitled to for the sale of our hardware, we estimate the variable consideration associated with customer returns. We record a reserve against revenue for hardware returns based on historical returns, which was 2% of hardware and other revenue for each of the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. We evaluate our hardware reserve on a quarterly basis or if there is an indication of significant changes in return experience. Historically, our returns of hardware have not significantly differed from our estimated reserve. In general, we provide assurance-type warranties related to the intended functionality of the products and services provided. These warranties were not identified as separate performance obligations.
Hardware and other revenue also includes activation fees charged to service provider partners for activation of a new subscriber account on our platforms, as well as fees paid by service provider partners for our marketing services. Our service provider partners use services on our platforms, such as support tools and applications, to assist in the installation of our solutions in subscriber properties. This installation marks the beginning of the service period on our platforms and, on occasion, we earn activation revenue for fees charged for this service. The activation fee is non-refundable, separately negotiated and specified in our contractual arrangements with our service provider partners and is charged to the service provider partner for each subscriber activated on our platforms. The decision whether to charge an activation fee is based in part on the expected number of subscribers to be added by our service provider partners and as a result, many of our largest service provider partners do not pay an activation fee. Activation fees are not offered on a stand-alone basis separate from our SaaS offering and are billed and received at the beginning of the arrangement. We record activation fees initially as deferred revenue and we recognize these fees ratably over the expected term of the subscribers’ account which we estimate is ten years based on our annual attrition rate. The portion of these activation fees included in current and long-term deferred revenue as of our balance sheet date represents the amounts that will be recognized ratably as revenue over the following twelve months, or longer as appropriate, until the ten-year expected term is complete. The balance of deferred revenue for activation fees was $9.9 million and $10.5 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which combines current and long-term balances.
Cost of Revenue
Our cost of SaaS and license revenue primarily includes the amounts paid to wireless network providers and, to a lesser extent, the costs of running our network operation centers which are expensed as incurred, as well as royalty costs in connection with technology licensed from third-party providers. Our cost of SaaS and license revenue also includes our cost of software license revenue, which primarily includes the payroll and payroll-related costs of the department dedicated to providing service exclusively to those service providers that host the Connect platform. Our cost of hardware and other revenue primarily includes cost of raw materials and amounts paid to our third-party manufacturer for production and fulfillment of our cellular radio modules and image sensors, and procurement costs for our video cameras, which we purchase from an original equipment manufacturer, and other devices. Our cost of hardware and other revenue also includes royalty costs in connection with technology licensed from third-party providers.
We record the cost of SaaS and license revenue as expenses are incurred, which corresponds to the delivery period of our services to our subscribers. We record the cost of hardware and other revenue when the hardware and other services are delivered to the service provider partner, which occurs when legal title transfers to the service provider partner. Our cost of revenue excludes amortization and depreciation.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses consist of sales and marketing, general and administrative, research and development and amortization and depreciation expenses. Salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, benefits and other personnel related costs are the most significant components of each of these expense categories, excluding amortization and depreciation. We include stock-based compensation expense in connection with the grant of stock options and other forms of equity compensation in the applicable operating expense category based on the respective equity award recipient’s function (sales and marketing, general and administrative or research and development). We grew from 750 employees as of June 30, 2017 to 828 employees as of June 30, 2018, and we expect to continue to hire new employees to support the projected future growth of our business.
Sales and Marketing Expense. Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of personnel and related expenses for our sales and marketing teams, including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, benefits, travel, and commissions. Our sales and marketing teams engage in sales, account management, service provider partner support, advertising, promotion of our products and services and marketing.
31
The number of employees in sales and marketing functions increased from 239 as of June 30, 2017 to 269 as of June 30, 2018. We expect to continue to invest in our sales and marketing activities to expand our business both domestically and internationally and, as a result, expect our sales and marketing expense to increase on an absolute dollar basis and increase as a percentage of our total revenue to levels consistent with 2016 in the short term. We intend to increase the size of our sales force and our service provider partner support team to provide additional support to our existing service provider partner base to drive their productivity in selling our solutions as well as to enroll new service provider partners in North America and in international markets. We also intend to increase our marketing investments in the form of marketing programs, trade shows and training to support our service provider partners’ efforts to enroll new subscribers and expand the adoption of our solutions.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense consists primarily of personnel and related expenses for our administrative, legal, information technology, human resources, finance and accounting personnel, including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, benefits and other personnel costs. Additional expenses included in this category are legal costs, including those that are incurred to defend and license our intellectual property, as well as non-personnel costs, such as travel related expenses, rent, subcontracting and professional fees, audit fees, tax services, and insurance expenses. Also included in general and administrative expenses are acquisition-related expenses, which consist primarily of legal, accounting and professional service fees directly related to acquisitions, valuation gains or losses on acquisition-related contingent liabilities.
The number of employees in general and administrative functions increased from 82 as of June 30, 2017 to 93 as of June 30, 2018. Excluding intellectual property litigation and acquisition-related costs, we expect general and administrative costs to increase prospectively as our business grows. This includes cost increases related to accounting, finance, and legal personnel, additional external legal, audit fees and other expenses associated with regulations governing public companies. We will continue to incur additional costs associated with being a public company including higher legal, corporate insurance and accounting expenses, including the additional costs of maintaining compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which has resulted in additional external audit and consulting fees. While somewhat unpredictable, we also expect to continue to incur costs related to litigation involving intellectual property, as well as integration costs associated with the acquisition of the Connect and Piper business units from Icontrol, which closed on March 8, 2017, which we refer to in this report as the Acquisition.
Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense consists primarily of personnel and related expenses for our employees working on our product development and software and device engineering teams, including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, benefits and other personnel costs. Also included are non-personnel costs such as consulting and professional fees paid to third-party development resources.
The number of employees in research and development functions increased from 429 as of June 30, 2017 to 466 as of June 30, 2018. Our research and development efforts are focused on innovating new features and enhancing the functionality of our platforms and the solutions we offer to our service provider partners and subscribers. We will also continue to invest in efforts to extend our platforms to adjacent markets and internationally. We expect research and development expenses to continue to increase on an absolute dollar basis and as a percentage of revenue in the short term to maintain our leadership position in the development of intelligently connected property technology, and continued enhancement of our Enterprise Tools platform for our service provider partners.
Amortization and Depreciation. Amortization and depreciation consists of amortization of intangible assets originating from our acquisitions as well as our internally-developed capitalized software. Our depreciation expense is related to investments in property and equipment. Acquired intangible assets include developed technology, customer related intangibles, trademarks and trade names. We expect in the near term that amortization and depreciation may fluctuate based on our acquisition activity, development of our platforms and capitalized expenditures.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists of interest expense associated with our credit facilities. On October 6, 2017, we entered into a $125.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, or the 2017 Facility, with SVB, as administrative agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as documentation agent, and a syndicate of lenders. The 2017 Facility is available to us to refinance existing debt and for general corporate and working capital purposes as permitted under the terms of the 2017 Credit Facility. Interest expense is expected to increase in 2018 as compared to 2017, as we utilized the 2017 Facility for the Acquisition.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net consists of our portion of the income or loss from our minority investments in other businesses accounted for under the equity method and interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents and our notes receivable.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act, was signed into law on December 22, 2017. This legislation made significant changes in U.S. tax law, including a reduction in the corporate tax rate, changes to net operating loss carryforwards and
32
carrybacks and a repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax. The legislation reduced the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%.
We are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes as well as foreign income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. As a result, we recognize tax liabilities based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Our effective tax rate was below the statutory rate primarily due to the tax windfall benefits from employee stock-based payment transactions as well as research and development tax credits claimed, partially offset by the impact of non-deductible meal and entertainment expenses. We recognize excess tax windfall benefits on a discrete basis in the quarter in which it occurs, and we anticipate that our effective tax rate will vary from quarter to quarter depending on our stock price and exercises of stock options under our equity incentive plans each period.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited selected condensed consolidated statements of operations and data as a percentage of revenue for the periods presented (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | $ | 70,968 | 68 | % | $ | 58,928 | 69 | % | $ | 138,956 | 70 | % | $ | 109,154 | 68 | % | |||||||||||
Hardware and other revenue | 33,520 | 32 | 27,060 | 31 | 58,288 | 30 | 51,028 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 104,488 | 100 | 85,988 | 100 | 197,244 | 100 | 160,182 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue(1): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of SaaS and license revenue | 11,027 | 11 | 8,500 | 10 | 21,833 | 11 | 16,592 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost of hardware and other revenue | 25,461 | 24 | 21,335 | 25 | 43,032 | 22 | 39,878 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 36,488 | 35 | 29,835 | 35 | 64,865 | 33 | 56,470 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses(2): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 14,612 | 14 | 11,899 | 14 | 25,434 | 13 | 22,213 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 18,119 | 17 | 13,450 | 16 | 34,281 | 17 | 28,825 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 21,521 | 21 | 20,062 | 22 | 41,898 | 21 | 34,583 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization and depreciation | 5,238 | 5 | 4,846 | 6 | 10,263 | 5 | 7,710 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 59,490 | 57 | 50,257 | 58 | 111,876 | 56 | 93,331 | 58 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 8,510 | 8 | 5,896 | 7 | 20,503 | 11 | 10,381 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (751 | ) | (1 | ) | (674 | ) | (1 | ) | (1,423 | ) | (1 | ) | (890 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income, net | 420 | — | 137 | — | 816 | — | 374 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 8,179 | 7 | 5,359 | 6 | 19,896 | 10 | 9,865 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefit from income taxes | (2,554 | ) | (3 | ) | (4,506 | ) | (5 | ) | (1,352 | ) | (1 | ) | (3,963 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,733 | 10 | % | $ | 9,865 | 11 | % | $ | 21,248 | 11 | % | $ | 13,828 | 9 | % |
_______________
(1) | Exclusive of amortization and depreciation shown in operating expenses below. |
(2) | Operating expenses include stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense data: | |||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 319 | $ | 65 | $ | 554 | $ | 178 | |||||||
General and administrative | 1,481 | 755 | 2,509 | 1,324 | |||||||||||
Research and development | 1,744 | 1,095 | 3,150 | 1,726 | |||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 3,544 | $ | 1,915 | $ | 6,213 | $ | 3,228 |
33
The following table sets forth the components of cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Components of cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue: | |||||||||||
Cost of SaaS and license revenue as a percentage of SaaS and license revenue | 16 | % | 14 | % | 16 | % | 15 | % | |||
Cost of hardware and other revenue as a percentage of hardware and other revenue | 76 | % | 79 | % | 74 | % | 78 | % | |||
Total cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue | 35 | % | 35 | % | 33 | % | 35 | % |
Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 to June 30, 2017
The following tables in this section set forth our selected condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands), data for the percentage change and data as a percentage of revenue for the periods presented:
Revenue
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | $ | 70,968 | $ | 58,928 | 20 | % | $ | 138,956 | $ | 109,154 | 27 | % | |||||||||
Hardware and other revenue | 33,520 | 27,060 | 24 | 58,288 | 51,028 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 104,488 | $ | 85,988 | 22 | % | $ | 197,244 | $ | 160,182 | 23 | % |
The $18.5 million increase in total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily the result of a $12.0 million, or 20%, increase in our SaaS and license revenue and a $6.5 million, or 24%, increase in our hardware and other revenue. Our software license revenue included within SaaS and license revenue increased $1.7 million to $10.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $8.5 million during the same period in the prior year. The increase in our Alarm.com segment SaaS and license revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily due to growth in our subscriber base, including the revenue impact from subscribers we added in 2017. To a lesser extent, SaaS and license revenue increased in the period due to an increase in license fees. The increase in hardware and other revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was due to an increase in the volume of video cameras sold and due to increases in volume of other peripherals sold including the system enhancement module. Our Other segment contributed 9% of the increase in SaaS and license revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in SaaS and license revenue for our Other segment for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was from our remote access management solution and our energy management and demand response solutions. The hardware and other revenue for our Other segment increased by $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the timing of sales related to our remote access management solution.
The $37.1 million increase in total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily the result of a $29.8 million, or 27%, increase in our SaaS and license revenue and a $7.3 million, or 14%, increase in our hardware and other revenue. Our software license revenue included within SaaS and license revenue increased $9.3 million to $20.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $10.8 million during the same period in the prior year. The increase in our Alarm.com segment SaaS and license revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily due to growth in our subscriber base, including the revenue impact from subscribers we added in 2017. Additionally, the increase in the software license revenue was due to the timing of the Acquisition. To a lesser extent, SaaS and license revenue increased in the period due to an increase in license fees. The increase in hardware and other revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to an increase in the volume of video cameras sold. Our Other segment contributed 7% of the increase in SaaS and license revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in SaaS and license revenue for our Other segment for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was from our remote access management solution and our energy management and demand response solutions. The hardware and other revenue for our Other segment increased by $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the timing of sales related to our remote access management solution.
34
Cost of Revenue
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue(1): | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of SaaS and license revenue | $ | 11,027 | $ | 8,500 | 30 | % | $ | 21,833 | $ | 16,592 | 32 | % | |||||||||
Cost of hardware and other revenue | 25,461 | 21,335 | 19 | 43,032 | 39,878 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | $ | 36,488 | $ | 29,835 | 22 | % | $ | 64,865 | $ | 56,470 | 15 | % | |||||||||
% of total revenue | 35 | % | 35 | % | 33 | % | 35 | % |
_______________
(1) | Excludes amortization and depreciation. |
The $6.7 million increase in cost of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was the result of a $2.5 million, or 30%, increase in cost of SaaS and license revenue and a $4.1 million, or 19%, increase in cost of hardware and other revenue. Our cost of software license revenue included within cost of SaaS and license revenue increased $0.1 million to $0.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $0.3 million during the same period in the prior year. The increase in cost of Alarm.com segment SaaS and license revenue related primarily to the growth in our subscriber base, which drove a corresponding increase in amounts paid to wireless network providers and, to a lesser extent, the costs of running our network operating centers. Cost of SaaS and license revenue as a percentage of SaaS and license revenue was 16% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 14% for the same period in the prior year. Cost of software license revenue as a percentage of software license revenue was 4% for each of the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. Cost of hardware and other revenue as a percentage of hardware and other revenue was 76% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 79% for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in cost of hardware and other revenue as a percentage of hardware and other revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year is a reflection of the mix of product sales during the periods.
The $8.4 million increase in cost of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was the result of a $5.2 million, or 32%, increase in cost of SaaS and license revenue and a $3.2 million, or 8%, increase in cost of hardware and other revenue. Our cost of software license revenue included within cost of SaaS and license revenue increased $0.5 million to $0.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $0.4 million during the same period in the prior year. The increase in cost of Alarm.com segment SaaS and license revenue related primarily to the growth in our subscriber base, which drove a corresponding increase in amounts paid to wireless network providers and, to a lesser extent, the costs of running our network operating centers. Additionally, the increase in the cost of software license revenue was due to the timing of the Acquisition. Cost of SaaS and license revenue as a percentage of SaaS and license revenue was 16% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 15% for the same period in the prior year. Cost of software license revenue as a percentage of software license revenue was 4% for each of the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. Cost of hardware and other revenue as a percentage of hardware and other revenue was 74% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 78% for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in cost of hardware and other revenue as a percentage of hardware and other revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year is a reflection of the mix of product sales during the periods.
Sales and Marketing Expense
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 14,612 | $ | 11,899 | 23 | % | $ | 25,434 | $ | 22,213 | 15 | % | |||||||||
% of total revenue | 14 | % | 14 | % | 13 | % | 14 | % |
The $2.7 million increase in sales and marketing expense for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to increases in our marketing programs to support our service provider partners’ efforts to enroll new subscribers and expand the adoption of our solutions. Additionally, the increase in sales and marketing expense was due to increases in headcount for our service provider partner support team to support our growth. As a result, our marketing expense for our Alarm.com segment increased $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Our personnel and related costs for our Alarm.com segment, including salary, benefits, stock-based compensation and travel expenses, increased by $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and our expenses for external consultants increased by $0.2 million. Sales and marketing expense from our Other segment remained relatively consistent for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of total revenue was 14% for each of the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
35
The $3.2 million increase in sales and marketing expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to increases in our marketing programs to support our service provider partners’ efforts to enroll new subscribers and expand the adoption of our solutions. Additionally, the increase in sales and marketing was due to increases in headcount for our service provider partner support team to support our growth. As a result, our marketing expense for our Alarm.com segment increased $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Our personnel and related costs for our Alarm.com segment, including salary, benefits, stock-based compensation and travel expenses, increased by $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and our expenses for external consultants increased by $0.3 million. Sales and marketing expense from our Other segment remained relatively consistent for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017. The number of employees in sales and marketing functions grew from 239 as of June 30, 2017 to 269 as of June 30, 2018. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of total revenue was 13% and 14% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
General and Administrative Expense
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | $ | 18,119 | $ | 13,450 | 35 | % | $ | 34,281 | $ | 28,825 | 19 | % | |||||||||
% of total revenue | 17 | % | 16 | % | 17 | % | 18 | % |
The $4.7 million increase in general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to a $5.6 million increase in legal expenses related to ongoing intellectual property litigation within our Alarm.com segment. This increase was partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in acquisition-related expenses related to the Acquisition. General and administrative expenses from our Other segment remained relatively consistent for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
The $5.5 million increase in general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to a $7.4 million increase in legal expenses related to ongoing intellectual property litigation within our Alarm.com segment. Additionally, there was a $0.9 million increase in personnel and related costs for our Alarm.com segment due to an increase in employee headcount to support our operational growth and from the addition of the Connect and ObjectVideo Labs teams. The increase was also due to a $0.5 million increase in expense for external consultants within our Alarm.com segment to support our growth and compliance with the regulations governing public companies as well as a $0.4 million increase in rent expense. These increases were partially offset by a $4.8 million decrease in acquisition-related expenses related to the Acquisition. General and administrative expenses from our Other segment increased by $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a $0.8 million increase in expense for external consultants. The number of employees in general and administrative functions increased from 82 as of June 30, 2017 to 93 as of June 30, 2018.
Research and Development Expense
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | $ | 21,521 | $ | 20,062 | 7 | % | $ | 41,898 | $ | 34,583 | 21 | % | |||||||||
% of total revenue | 21 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | 22 | % |
The $1.5 million increase in research and development expense for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to an increase in headcount of employees in research and development functions. Our personnel and related costs for our Alarm.com segment increased by $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Research and development expense from our Other segment decreased by $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in the development efforts within our Piper business and a corresponding decrease in related expense.
The $7.3 million increase in research and development expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to an increase in headcount of employees in research and development functions as a result of the Acquisition and the ObjectVideo Labs acquisition. Our personnel and related costs for our Alarm.com segment increased by $5.8 million in for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year. In addition, expense for external consultants and information technology to support our research and development personnel increased by $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Research and development expense from our Other segment decreased by $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a $0.5 million decrease in development expense related to the decrease in the development efforts within our Piper
36
business. This decrease was partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in personnel and related expense. The number of employees in research and development functions increased from 429 as of June 30, 2017 to 466 as of June 30, 2018.
Amortization and Depreciation
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization and depreciation | $ | 5,238 | $ | 4,846 | 8 | % | $ | 10,263 | $ | 7,710 | 33 | % | |||||||||
% of total revenue | 5 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % |
Amortization and depreciation increased $0.4 million and $2.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to customer relationships, developed technology and trade name intangibles acquired in connection with the Acquisition.
Interest Expense
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | (751 | ) | $ | (674 | ) | 11 | % | $ | (1,423 | ) | $ | (890 | ) | 60 | % | |||||
% of total revenue | (1 | )% | (1 | )% | (1 | )% | (1 | )% |
Interest expense increased $0.1 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase in interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in the prior year is primarily due to a higher average outstanding balance on our credit facility as a result of the Acquisition.
Other Income, Net
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net | $ | 420 | $ | 137 | 207 | % | $ | 816 | $ | 374 | 118 | % | |||||||||
% of total revenue | — | % | — | % | — | % | — | % |
Other income, net increased $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. Included in other income, net was interest income earned on our cash balance and interest income earned on notes receivable.
Benefit from Income Taxes
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefit from income taxes | $ | (2,554 | ) | $ | (4,506 | ) | (43 | )% | $ | (1,352 | ) | $ | (3,963 | ) | (66 | )% | |||||
% of total revenue | (3 | )% | (5 | )% | (1 | )% | (3 | )% |
Our effective income tax rates were (31.2)% and (6.8)% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to (84.1)% and (40.2)% for the same periods in the prior year. The increase in the effective tax rates was primarily related to a decrease in the tax windfall benefits from the exercise of employee stock options as well as a decrease in the research and development tax credits claimed for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in the prior year.
37
Segment Information
We have two reportable segments: Alarm.com and Other. Our Alarm.com segment represents our cloud-based platforms for the intelligently connected property and related solutions that contributed 93% and 94% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to 94% for the same periods in the prior year. Our Other segment is focused on researching, developing and offering residential and commercial automation solutions and energy management products and services in adjacent markets. The consolidated subsidiaries that make up our Other segment are in the investment stage and have incurred significant operating expenses relative to their revenue.
Our Alarm.com segment increased from 672 employees as of June 30, 2017 to 752 employees as of June 30, 2018. Our Other segment decreased from 78 employees as of June 30, 2017 to 76 employees as of June 30, 2018. Inter-segment revenue includes sales of hardware between our segments.
The following table presents our revenue, inter-segment revenue and operating expenses by segment (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | Hardware and other revenue | Operating expenses | SaaS and license revenue | Hardware and other revenue | Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||||
Alarm.com | $ | 68,076 | $ | 30,602 | $ | 55,096 | $ | 57,109 | $ | 24,229 | $ | 45,097 | |||||||||||
Other | 2,892 | 5,508 | 4,394 | 1,819 | 3,616 | 5,160 | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment Alarm.com | — | (1,459 | ) | — | — | (497 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Intersegment Other | — | (1,131 | ) | — | — | (288 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 70,968 | $ | 33,520 | $ | 59,490 | $ | 58,928 | $ | 27,060 | $ | 50,257 | |||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SaaS and license revenue | Hardware and other revenue | Operating expenses | SaaS and license revenue | Hardware and other revenue | Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||||
Alarm.com | $ | 133,738 | $ | 53,603 | $ | 102,327 | $ | 105,990 | $ | 45,860 | $ | 84,337 | |||||||||||
Other | 5,218 | 9,164 | 9,549 | 3,164 | 6,723 | 8,994 | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment Alarm.com | — | (2,241 | ) | — | — | (1,145 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Intersegment Other | — | (2,238 | ) | — | — | (410 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 138,956 | $ | 58,288 | $ | 111,876 | $ | 109,154 | $ | 51,028 | $ | 93,331 |
Our SaaS and license revenue for the Alarm.com segment included software license revenue of $10.2 million and $20.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared to $8.5 million and $10.8 million for the same periods in the prior year. There was no software license revenue recorded for the Other segment during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue, costs and expenses during the reported period. In accordance with GAAP, we base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and to the extent that there are differences between our estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected. During the first quarter of 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," which did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial
38
statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. See Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for more information. Except as disclosed in Note 2, there were no other material changes to our use of estimates or other critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on February 28, 2018.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 2 of our condensed consolidated financial statements for information related to recently issued accounting standards.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working Capital
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net and working capital, for the periods indicated (in thousands):
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 105,959 | $ | 96,329 | |||
Accounts receivable, net | 52,553 | 40,634 | |||||
Working capital | 148,265 | 119,433 |
We define working capital as current assets minus current liabilities. Our cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2018 are available for working capital purposes. We do not enter into investments for trading purposes, and our investment policy is to invest any excess cash in short term, highly liquid investments that limit the risk of principal loss; therefore, our cash and cash equivalents are held in demand deposit accounts that generate very low returns.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2018, we had $106.0 million in cash and cash equivalents. We consider all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity from the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. To date, we have principally financed our operations through cash generated by operating activities and, to a lesser extent, through private and public equity financings.
We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with our 2017 Facility, and our future cash flows from operating activities will be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Over the final six months of fiscal year 2018, we expect our capital expenditure requirements to be approximately $8.0 million, primarily related to the continued build out of our leased office space to support our increasing headcount as well as purchases of computer software and equipment. In April 2018, we made a prepayment of $5.2 million for long lead-time parts related to our inventory. Our future working capital and capital expenditure requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate of our revenue growth, the amount and timing of our investments in human resources and capital equipment, future acquisitions and investments, and the timing and extent of our introduction of new solutions and platform and solution enhancements. To the extent our cash and cash equivalents, together with our 2017 Facility, and cash flows from operating activities are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to borrow additional funds through our bank credit arrangements or raise funds from public or private equity or debt financings. If we raise additional funds through the incurrence of indebtedness, such indebtedness would likely have rights that are senior to holders of our equity securities and could contain covenants that restrict our operations. Any additional equity financing would be dilutive to our current stockholders.
Sources of Liquidity
Our 2017 Facility is a revolving credit facility with SVB, as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders to finance working capital and certain permitted acquisitions and investments. The 2017 Facility is available to us to refinance existing debt and for general corporate and working capital purposes including acquisitions, and has a current borrowing capacity of $125.0 million. We have the option to increase the borrowing capacity of the 2017 Facility to $175.0 million with the consent of the lenders.
As of June 30, 2018, $69.0 million was outstanding under the 2017 Facility, no letters of credit were outstanding and $56.0 million remained available for borrowing under the 2017 Facility. The 2017 Facility contains various financial and other covenants that require us to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a fixed charge coverage ratio, and limit our capacity to incur other indebtedness, liens, make certain payments including dividends, and enter into other transactions without approval of the lenders. The 2017 Facility is secured by substantially all of our assets, including our intellectual property. As of June 30, 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2017 Facility. Our outstanding amounts under the 2017 Facility are due at maturity in October 2022. The 2017 Facility is discussed in more detail below under “Debt Obligations.”
39
Historical Cash Flows
The following table sets forth our cash flows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 15,204 | $ | 24,736 | |||
Cash flows used in investing activities | (6,131 | ) | (164,003 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities | 557 | 67,549 |
Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities have typically been generated from our net income and by changes in our operating assets and liabilities, particularly from accounts receivable and inventory, adjusted for non-cash expense items such as amortization and depreciation, deferred income taxes and stock-based compensation.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, cash flows from operating activities were $15.2 million, a decrease of $9.5 million from the same period in the prior year, as the result of a $23.1 million reduction in cash from operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by a $7.4 million increase in net income and a $6.2 million increase in non-cash items.
The $23.1 million reduction in cash from operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to differences in timing of collection of receipts and payments of disbursements as well as an $8.6 million increase in the change in prepaid expenses, primarily comprised of prepayments for inventory, and a $2.8 million settlement of the liability related to the subsidiary unit awards during the six months ended June 30, 2018. The $6.2 million increase in non-cash items was primarily due to a $3.0 million increase in stock-based compensation resulting from grants of stock options and restricted stock units during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Additionally, there was a $2.6 million increase in amortization and depreciation primarily due to the additional amortization of customer relationships, developed technology and trade name intangibles acquired from the Acquisition in the first quarter of 2017.
Investing Activities
Our investing activities typically include acquisitions, capital expenditures, notes receivable issued to companies with offerings complementary to ours and proceeds from the repayment of those notes receivable. Our capital expenditures have primarily been for general business use, including leasehold improvements as we have expanded our office space to accommodate our growth in headcount, computer equipment used internally, and expansion of our network operations centers.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, our cash flows used in investing activities was $6.1 million as compared to $164.0 million for the same period in the prior year. The $157.9 million decrease in cash flows used in investing activities was primarily due to our payment of $154.3 million, net of cash acquired, for our acquisitions in the first quarter of 2017. In addition, we issued loans to distribution partners in the amount of $4.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and no similar loans were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2018.
Financing Activities
Cash generated by financing activities includes borrowings under credit facilities and proceeds from the issuance of common stock from employee stock option exercises and from our employee stock purchase plan. Cash used in financing activities typically includes repurchases of common stock and repayments of debt.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, cash flows from in financing activities was $0.6 million compared to $67.6 million in cash flows from financing activities during the same period in the prior year. The $67.0 million decrease in cash flows from financing activities was primarily due to the $67.0 million of proceeds borrowed under the credit facilities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 related to the Acquisition in March 2017.
Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2018, there were no material changes in our contractual obligations and commitments from those disclosed in the “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on February 28, 2018.
40
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, including entities sometimes referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities that were established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. We do not engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts.
Debt Obligations
On October 6, 2017, we entered into a $125.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, or the 2017 Facility, with SVB, as administrative agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as documentation agent, and a syndicate of lenders. Upon entry into the 2017 Facility, we borrowed $72.0 million, which was used to repay the previously outstanding balance under our previous credit facility. The 2017 Facility matures in October 2022 and includes an option to further increase the borrowing capacity to $175.0 million with the consent of the lenders. Costs incurred in connection with the 2017 Facility were capitalized and are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the 2017 Facility. The 2017 Facility is secured by substantially all of our assets, including our intellectual property. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we repaid $1.0 million and $2.0 million of the outstanding balance of the 2017 Facility, respectively, as compared to $1.0 million repaid during the same periods in the prior year.
The outstanding principal balance on the 2017 Facility accrues interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either (1) LIBOR, plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio, or (2) the highest of (a) the Wall Street Journal prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00% plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we elected for the outstanding principal balance to accrue interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%, LIBOR plus 1.75%, LIBOR plus 2.00%, and LIBOR plus 2.50% when our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 1.00:1.00, greater than or equal to 1.00:1.00 but less than 2.00:1.00, greater than or equal to 2.00:1.00 but less than 3.00:1.00 and greater than or equal to 3.00:1.00, respectively. The 2017 Facility also carries an unused line commitment fee of 0.20%. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the effective interest rate on the credit facilities was 4.00%, as compared to 4.65% for the same period in the prior year.
The carrying value of the 2017 Facility was $69.0 million and $71.0 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The 2017 Facility includes a variable interest rate that approximates market rates and, as such, we classified the liability as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and determined that the carrying amount of the 2017 Facility approximated its fair value as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The 2017 Facility contains various financial and other covenants that require us to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 3.50:1.00 and a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.25:1.00. As of June 30, 2018, we were in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants and there were no events of default. The 2017 Facility also contains customary conditions to borrowings and events of default and contains various negative covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability to dispose of assets, merge with or acquire other entities, incur indebtedness, incur encumbrances, make certain payments including dividends, make investments or engage in transactions with affiliates without approval of the lenders.
Non-GAAP Measures
We define Adjusted EBITDA as our net income before interest expense and other income, net, provision for income taxes, amortization and depreciation, stock-based compensation expense, acquisition-related expense and legal costs and settlement fees incurred in connection with non-ordinary course litigation and other disputes, particularly costs involved in ongoing intellectual property litigation. We do not consider these items to be indicative of our core operating performance. The non-cash items include amortization and depreciation expense, stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and other forms of equity compensation, including, but not limited to, the sale of common stock. We do not adjust for ordinary course legal expenses resulting from maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property portfolio and license agreements. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. See the table below for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
We have included Adjusted EBITDA in this report because it is a key measure that our management uses to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends, to generate future operating plans, to make strategic decisions regarding the allocation of capital and to make investments in initiatives that are focused on cultivating new markets for our solutions. We also use certain non-GAAP financial measures, including Adjusted EBITDA, as performance measures under our executive bonus plan. Further, we believe the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating Adjusted EBITDA facilitates comparisons of our operating performance on a period-to-period basis and, in the case of exclusion of acquisition-related expense and certain historical legal expenses, excludes items that we do not consider to be indicative of our core operating performance. Accordingly, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors.
Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our financial results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are: (a) although depreciation
41
and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements; (b) Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; (c) Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based compensation; (d) Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us; and (e) other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA or similarly titled measures differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Because of these and other limitations, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside our other GAAP-based financial performance measures, net income and our other GAAP financial results. The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA: | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,733 | $ | 9,865 | $ | 21,248 | $ | 13,828 | |||||||
Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense and other income, net | 331 | 537 | 607 | 516 | |||||||||||
Benefit from income taxes | (2,554 | ) | (4,506 | ) | (1,352 | ) | (3,963 | ) | |||||||
Amortization and depreciation expense | 5,238 | 4,846 | 10,263 | 7,710 | |||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 3,544 | 1,915 | 6,213 | 3,228 | |||||||||||
Acquisition-related expense | — | 1,973 | — | 5,621 | |||||||||||
Litigation expense | 6,117 | 1,251 | 9,388 | 3,044 | |||||||||||
Total adjustments | 12,676 | 6,016 | 25,119 | 16,156 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 23,409 | $ | 15,881 | $ | 46,367 | $ | 29,984 |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily the result of fluctuations in interest rates, as well as to a lesser extent, foreign exchange rates and inflation.
Interest Rate Risk
We are primarily exposed to changes in short-term interest rates with respect to our cost of borrowing under our 2017 Facility with SVB. We monitor our cost of borrowing under our various facilities, taking into account our funding requirements, and our expectation for short-term rates in the future. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, an increase or decrease in the interest rate on our 2017 Facility with SVB by 100 basis points would increase or decrease our annual interest expense by approximately $0.7 million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Because substantially all of our revenue and operating expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, we do not believe that our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk is material to our business, financial condition or results of operations. If a significant portion of our revenue and operating expenses becomes denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, we may not be able to effectively manage this risk, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by translation and by transactional foreign currency conversions.
Inflation Risk
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. If our costs become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
42
by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2018. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2018, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On June 2, 2015, Vivint, Inc., or Vivint, filed a lawsuit against us in U.S. District Court, District of Utah, alleging that our technology directly and indirectly infringes six patents that Vivint purchased. Vivint is seeking permanent injunctions, enhanced damages and attorneys' fees. We answered the complaint on July 23, 2015. Among other things, we asserted defenses based on non-infringement and invalidity of the patents in question. On August 19, 2016, the U.S. District Court, District of Utah stayed the litigation pending inter partes review, or IPR, by the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board, or PTAB, of five of the patents in suit. In March 2017, the PTAB issued final written decisions relating to two patents finding all challenged claims unpatentable. In May 2017, the PTAB issued final written decisions relating to the remaining patents that found certain claims unpatentable, while certain other claims were not found to be unpatentable. Vivint has appealed the decisions to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and we have cross-appealed. The U.S. District Court, District of Utah lifted the stay on the litigation on June 26, 2017, and Vivint is proceeding with its case on four of the six patents in its complaint. Fact discovery is scheduled to close on or about August 31, 2018, and no trial date has been set. In September 2017, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered ex parte reexaminations of certain claims of two of the remaining patents in suit, at our request. On July 13, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s March 2017 decision, which invalidated all challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,884,713.
Should Vivint prevail on its claims that one or more elements of our solution infringe one or more of its patents, we could be required to pay damages of Vivint’s lost profits and/or a reasonable royalty for sales of our solution, enjoined from making, using and selling our solution if a license or other right to continue selling such elements is not made available to us or we are unable to design around such patents, and required to pay ongoing royalties and comply with unfavorable terms if such a license is made available to us. While we believe we have valid defenses to Vivint’s claims, any of these outcomes could result in a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we were to prevail, this litigation could continue to be costly and time-consuming, divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations and dissuade potential customers from purchasing our solution, which would also materially harm our business. During the course of litigation, we anticipate announcements of the results of hearings and motions, and other interim developments related to the litigation. If securities analysts or investors regard these announcements as negative, the market price of our common stock may decline.
43
On December 30, 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against us in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA. The complaint does not allege that Alarm.com itself violated the TCPA, but instead seeks to hold us responsible for the marketing activities of our service provider partners under principles of agency and vicarious liability. Specifically, the plaintiffs seek to hold us liable for telemarketing calls made by one of our service providers, as well as calls made by one of its sub-dealer agents, that purportedly violated the TCPA’s provisions concerning use of Automatic Telephone Dialing Systems (“ATDS”) and placing calls to numbers listed on the national Do-Not-Call (“DNC”) registry. The complaint seeks monetary damages under the TCPA, injunctive relief, and other relief, including attorneys' fees. On May 5, 2017, the court granted plaintiffs' motion for class certification, and certified two plaintiff classes: a DNC class and an ATDS class. Plaintiffs claim that 393,762 individuals received 3,002,373 telephone calls in violation of the TCPA’s DNC-related provisions, and that 22,055 individuals received 119,484 telephone calls in violation of the TCPA’s ATDS-related provisions. Discovery is closed, and the matter remains pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The court has denied the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and based on the current schedule, we anticipate a trial will take place in October 2018.
The outcome of this legal claim and proceeding against us cannot be predicted with certainty. While we believe we have valid defenses to plaintiffs’ claims, a negative outcome could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. If plaintiffs’ claims are successful, a jury could award damages of up to $500 per telephone call made to class members on the Do Not Call Registry. Calls made in violation of the ATDS-related provisions are subject to statutory damages of $500 per call. Both ATDS- and DNC-related damages may be trebled if the violations are found to be knowing or willful. Should we decide to appeal an adverse verdict, we would be required to post a bond in the amount of that verdict to stay execution of the judgment while the appeal is pending, which may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. Even if we were to prevail, this litigation could continue to be costly and time-consuming, divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations and dissuade potential customers from purchasing our solutions, which could also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. During the course of litigation, we anticipate announcements of the results of hearings and motions, and other interim developments related to the litigation. If securities analysts or investors regard these announcements as negative, the market price of our common stock may decline.
On August 14, 2017, Alarm.com filed a lawsuit against ABS Capital Partners, Inc., ABS Partners V, LLC, ABS Partners VII, LLC, and Ralph Terkowitz in the Delaware Court of Chancery, or the Chancery Court. The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief preventing the defendants from using Alarm.com’s confidential information and trade secrets to compete with Alarm.com, and preventing the defendants from executing their planned transaction to invest in two companies (ipDatatel, LLC, or ipDatatel, and Resolution Products, Inc., or Resolution Products). The complaint alleged claims of breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of trade secrets, and misappropriation of confidential information, in connection with the defendants’ planned investment. On September 22, 2017, Alarm.com filed an amended complaint against ABS Capital Partners, Inc., ABS Partners V, LLC, and ABS Partners VII, LLC, alleging claims for misappropriation of trade secrets and misappropriation of confidential information. The amended complaint seeks damages, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief enjoining ABS Capital Partners, Inc., ABS Partners V, LLC, and ABS Partners VII, LLC from using Alarm.com’s trade secrets and confidential information to compete with Alarm.com. On October 6, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. On June 15, 2018, the Chancery Court dismissed our complaint. On July 13, 2018, Alarm.com filed a Notice of Appeal with the Delaware Supreme Court.
On August 24, 2017, Alarm.com Incorporated and its wholly owned subsidiary ICN Acquisition, LLC, filed a patent infringement complaint against ipDatatel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The parties subsequently stipulated to transfer the case to the Southern District of Texas. The complaint seeks injunctive relief to stop the further sale of the infringing ipDatatel’s products and systems, and damages for the infringement of Alarm.com’s patents. The complaint asserts that the technology in the ipDatatel products infringe one or more claims of Alarm.com’s patents: United States Patent Numbers 7,113,090; 7,633,385; 7,956,736; 8,478,871; and 9,141,276. If the litigation is successful, Alarm.com will be entitled to receive monetary damages, injunctive relief, and any other relief, including attorneys' fees, from ipDatatel. The Court has scheduled a claim construction hearing for September 2018 and commencement of trial in August 2019. ipDatatel has not yet answered the complaint or asserted counterclaims and defenses. ipDatatel's motion for dismissal based on alleged patent ineligibility as to each patent in suit was denied without prejudice. On July 26, 2018, ipDatatel answered the complaint by denying the patent infringement allegations and asserting several affirmative defenses, including invalidity and unenforceability. ipDatatel also asserted antitrust counterclaims based on alleged inequitable conduct in connection with the prosecution of one or more patents-in-suit.
On April 25, 2017, Alarm.com Incorporated and its wholly owned subsidiary ICN Acquisition, LLC, filed a patent infringement complaint against Protect America, Inc., or Protect America, and SecureNet Technologies, LLC, or SecureNet, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The complaint seeks injunctive relief to stop the further sale of the infringing Protect America and SecureNet products and systems, and damages for the infringement of Alarm.com’s patents. The complaint asserts that the technology in the Protect America and SecureNet Alarm Systems products infringe one or more claims of Alarm.com’s patents: United States Patent Numbers 7,113,090; 7,633,385; 8,395,494; 8,493,202; 8,612,591; 8,860,804; and 9,141,276. If the litigation is successful, Alarm.com will be entitled to receive monetary damages, injunctive relief, and any other relief, including attorneys' fees, from Protect America and SecureNet. In June 2017, Alarm.com filed an amended
44
complaint against Protect America only and voluntarily dismissed SecureNet from the suit, reserving the right to refile. In September 2017, Alarm.com voluntarily dismissed the amended complaint in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia and refiled a complaint against Protect America, with substantially the same allegations, in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas. Protect America has not yet answered the complaint or asserted counterclaims and defenses. Protect America has moved for dismissal or transfer to the Western District of Texas based on allegedly improper venue. The parties subsequently stipulated to transfer the case to the Western District of Texas. The Court has not yet entered a scheduling order.
In September 2014, Icontrol filed a Complaint in the United States District Court, District of Delaware, asserting that SecureNet infringes certain U.S. Patents owned by Icontrol, patents now owned by Alarm.com through a subsidiary. In March 2015, Icontrol voluntarily agreed to dismiss the case, reserving the right to refile. In September 2015, Icontrol refiled the case against SecureNet in the same district court alleging infringement of some of the same patents. SecureNet filed petitions for inter partes review of the patents-in-suit before the PTAB. Proceedings as to one of the patents in suit (United States Patent Number 7,855,635) was instituted, resulting in the cancellation of some, but not all, claims of that patent. That decision is currently before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The PTAB has rejected the remaining applications for inter partes review. SecureNet requested rehearing of the rejection as to one of the patents in suit, which request has been rejected by the PTAB. In April 2018, the Court issued an order construing certain patent claim terms. The Court has scheduled commencement of trial in February 2019.
On March 29, 2018, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against us by Nick Fisher in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging violations of the TCPA, and the Telemarketing And Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, or TCFAPA. The complaint alleges that Alarm.com and another defendant, Nortek Security & Control LLC, violated the TCPA and TCFAPA through purportedly unauthorized telephone calls to Fisher, and seeks to hold us responsible for the alleged calls, including under principles of agency and vicarious liability. The complaint seeks monetary damages under the TCPA and TCFAPA, injunctive relief, and other relief, including attorneys' fees. We answered the complaint and filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on June 18, 2018. The matter remains pending.
In addition, we may be a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to numerous risks. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, in addition to other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as our other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects and cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our quarterly results of operations have fluctuated and are likely to continue to fluctuate. As a result, we may fail to meet or exceed the expectations of investors or securities analysts, which could cause our stock price to decline.
Our quarterly operating results, including the levels of our revenue, gross margin, cash flow and deferred revenue, may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, including revenue related to the product mix that we sell, the relative sales related to our platforms and solutions and other factors which are outside of our control. If our quarterly revenue or results of operations fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Fluctuations in our results of operations may be due to a number of factors, including:
• | the portion of our revenue attributable to software as a service, or SaaS, and license versus hardware and other sales; |
• | our ability to manage the businesses we acquired from Icontrol and any future acquisitions of businesses; |
• | fluctuations in demand, including due to seasonality, for our platforms and solutions; |
• | changes in pricing by us in response to competitive pricing actions; |
• | our ability to increase, retain and incentivize the service provider partners that market, sell, install and support our platforms and solutions; |
• | the ability of our hardware vendors to continue to manufacture high-quality products and to supply sufficient products to meet our demands; |
45
• | the timing and success of introductions of new solutions, products or upgrades by us or our competitors and the entrance of new competitors; |
• | changes in our business and pricing policies or those of our competitors; |
• | the ability to accurately forecast revenue as we generally rely upon our service provider partner network to generate new revenue; |
• | our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses and the costs of the hardware we purchase; |
• | competition, including entry into the industry by new competitors and new offerings by existing competitors; |
• | issues related to introductions of new or improved products such as shortages of prior generation products or short-term decreased demand for next generation products; |
• | perceived or actual problems with the security, integrity, reliability, quality or compatibility of our solutions, including those related to security breaches in our systems, our subscribers’ systems, unscheduled downtime, or outages; |
• | the amount and timing of expenditures, including those related to expanding our operations, including through acquisitions, increasing research and development, introducing new solutions or paying litigation expenses; |
• | the ability to effectively manage growth within existing and new markets domestically and abroad; |
• | changes in the payment terms for our platforms and solutions; |
• | the strength of regional, national and global economies; and |
• | the impact of natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, power outages, floods and other catastrophic events or man-made problems such as terrorism or global or regional economic, political and social conditions. |
Due to the foregoing factors and the other risks discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an indication of our future performance. You should not consider our recent revenue and Adjusted EBITDA growth or results of one quarter as indicative of our future performance. See the Non-GAAP Measures section of Item 2. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," for a discussion of the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most comparable GAAP measurement, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
We may not sustain our growth rate and we may not be able to manage any future growth effectively.
We have experienced significant growth and also have substantially expanded our operations in a short period of time. Our revenue increased from $167.3 million in 2014 to $338.9 million in 2017 and increased from $160.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $197.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. We do not expect to achieve similar growth rates in future periods. You should not rely on our operating results for any prior quarterly or annual periods as an indication of our future operating performance. If we are unable to maintain expected revenue growth in both absolute dollars and as a percentage of prior period revenue, our financial results could suffer and our stock price could decline.
Our future operating results depend, to a large extent, on our ability to successfully manage our anticipated expansion and growth. To successfully manage our growth and obligations as a public company, we believe we must effectively, among other things:
• | maintain our relationships with existing service provider partners and add new service provider partners; |
• | increase our subscriber base and help our service provider partners maintain and improve their revenue retention rates, while also expanding their cross-sell effectiveness; |
• | add, train and integrate sales and marketing personnel; |
• | expand our international operations; and |
• | continue to implement and improve our administrative, financial and operational systems, procedures and controls. |
We intend to continue to invest in research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative functions and other areas to grow our business. We are likely to recognize the costs associated with these increased investments earlier than some of the anticipated benefits and the return on these investments may be lower, or may develop more slowly, than we expect, which could adversely affect our operating results.
46
If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities or develop new solutions or enhancements to our existing solutions and we may fail to satisfy subscriber and service provider partner requirements, maintain the quality of our solutions, execute on our business plan or respond to competitive pressures, which could result in our financial results suffering and a decline in our stock price.
We have expanded our business rapidly in recent periods. If we fail to manage the expansion of our operations and infrastructure effectively, we may be unable to execute our business plan, maintain high levels of service or address competitive challenges adequately.
We increased our number of full-time employees from 400 as of December 31, 2014 to 828 as of June 30, 2018. Our growth has placed, and may continue to place, a significant strain on our managerial, administrative, operational, financial and other resources. We intend to further expand our overall business, service provider partner network, subscriber base, headcount and operations, including by acquiring other businesses. Creating a global organization and managing a geographically dispersed workforce will require substantial management effort and significant additional investment in our infrastructure. We will be required to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting procedures to ensure timely and accurate reporting of our operational and financial results and we may not be able to do so effectively. As such, we may be unable to manage our expenses effectively in the future, which may negatively impact our gross profit or operating expenses in any particular quarter. If we fail to manage our anticipated growth and change in a manner that preserves the key aspects of our corporate culture, the quality of our solutions may suffer, which could negatively affect our brand and reputation and harm our ability to retain and attract service provider partners and consumers.
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings where a negative outcome could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We are involved and have been involved in the past in legal proceedings from time to time. For example, on June 2, 2015, Vivint filed a lawsuit against us alleging that our technology directly and indirectly infringes six patents purchased by Vivint. On December 30, 2015, a class action lawsuit was filed against us, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA. See the section of this Quarterly Report titled "Legal Proceedings" for additional information on each of these matters. We may not be able to accurately assess the risks related to any of these suits, and we may be unable to accurately assess our level of exposure. Companies in our industry have been subject to claims related to patent infringement, regulatory matters, and product liability, as well as contract and employment-related claims. As a result of patent infringement and other intellectual property proceedings, we have, and may be required to seek in the future, licenses under patents or intellectual property rights owned by third parties, including open-source software and other commercially available software, which can be costly, or cross-license agreements relating to our and third-party intellectual property. The outcome of legal claims and proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty, and a negative outcome could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We are the subject of a pending TCPA class action lawsuit, and a negative outcome could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We are currently defending a class action lawsuit filed against us in which the plaintiffs seek to hold us responsible for the telemarketing activities of one of our service provider partners under principles of agency and vicarious liability. Specifically, the plaintiffs seek to hold us liable for telemarketing calls made by one of our service providers, as well as calls made by one of its sub-dealer agents, that purportedly violated the TCPA’s provisions concerning use of Automatic Telephone Dialing Systems (“ATDS”) and placing calls to numbers listed on the national Do-Not-Call (“DNC”) registry. The complaint seeks monetary damages under the TCPA, injunctive relief, and other relief, including attorneys' fees. On May 5, 2017, the court granted plaintiffs' motion for class certification, and certified two plaintiff classes: a DNC class and an ATDS class. Plaintiffs claim that 393,762 individuals received 3,002,373 telephone calls in violation of the TCPA’s DNC-related provisions, and that 22,055 individuals received 119,484 telephone calls in violation of the TCPA’s ATDS-related provisions. We anticipate a trial will take place in October 2018. The outcome of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty. In the event of a negative outcome, we may have to pay significant damages. If the plaintiffs are successful in their claims against us, a jury could award damages of up to $500 per telephone call made to class members on the DNC Registry, and calls made in violation of the ATDS-related provisions are subject to statutory damages of $500 per call. Such damages may be trebled if the violations are found to be knowing or willful. See the section of this Quarterly Report titled "Legal Proceedings" for additional information on this matter. Each lawsuit is based on the unique facts and circumstances at issue in each case, including the number of calls alleged to have violated the TCPA, and, in the case of a jury verdict, the final amount the jury decides to award in damages, and whether the judge decides to approve, increase, or reduce the damages awarded. Should we decide to appeal an adverse verdict, we would be required to post a bond in the amount of that verdict to stay execution of the judgment while the appeal is pending, which may not be available to us on reasonable terms, if at all. A negative outcome could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Even if we were to prevail, this litigation could continue to be costly and time-consuming, divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations and dissuade potential customers from purchasing our solution, which could also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. During the
47
course of litigation, we anticipate announcements of the results of hearings and motions, and other interim developments related to the litigation. If securities analysts or investors regard these announcements as negative, the market price of our common stock may decline.
Our business operates in a regulated industry.
Our business, operations and service provider partners are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local consumer protection laws, licensing regulation and other laws and regulations, and, to a lesser extent, similar Canadian laws and regulations. Our advertising and sales practices and that of our service provider partner network are subject to regulation by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC, in addition to state consumer protection laws. The FTC and the Federal Communications Commission have issued regulations that place restrictions on, among other things, unsolicited automated telephone calls to residential and wireless telephone subscribers by means of automatic telephone dialing systems and the use of prerecorded or artificial voice messages. If our service provider partners were to take actions in violation of these regulations, such as telemarketing to individuals on the “Do Not Call” registry or using automatic telephone dialing systems and prerecorded or artificial voice messages, we could be subject to fines, penalties, private actions or enforcement actions by government regulators. For example, on December 30, 2015, a class action lawsuit was filed against us, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA. See the section of this Quarterly Report titled "Legal Proceedings" for additional information on this matter. Although we have taken steps to insulate ourselves from any such wrongful conduct by our service provider partners, and to require our service provider partners to comply with these laws and regulations, no assurance can be given that we will not be exposed to liability as result of our service provider partners’ conduct. Further, to the extent that any changes in law or regulation further restrict the lead generation activity of our service provider partners, these restrictions could result in a material reduction in subscriber acquisition opportunities, reducing the growth prospects of our business and adversely affecting our financial condition and future cash flows. In addition, most states in which we operate have licensing laws directed specifically toward the monitored security services industry. Our business relies heavily upon cellular telephone service to communicate signals. Cellular telephone companies are currently regulated by both federal and state governments. Changes in laws or regulations could require us to change the way we operate, which could increase costs or otherwise disrupt operations. In addition, failure to comply with any such applicable laws or regulations could result in substantial fines or revocation of our operating permits and licenses, including in geographic areas where our services have substantial penetration, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. Further, if these laws and regulations were to change or if we fail to comply with such laws and regulations as they exist today or in the future, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
The markets in which we participate are highly competitive and many companies, including large technology companies, broadband and security service providers and other managed service providers, are actively targeting the home automation, security monitoring, video monitoring and energy management markets. If we are unable to compete effectively with these companies, our sales and profitability could be adversely affected.
We compete in several markets, including security, video, automation, energy management and wellness solutions. The markets in which we participate are highly competitive and competition may intensify in the future.
Our ability to compete depends on a number of factors, including:
• | our platforms and solutions’ functionality, performance, ease of use, reliability, availability and cost effectiveness relative to that of our competitors’ products; |
• | our success in utilizing new and proprietary technologies to offer solutions and features previously not available in the marketplace; |
• | our success in identifying new markets, applications and technologies; |
• | our ability to attract and retain service provider partners; |
• | our name recognition and reputation; |
• | our ability to recruit software engineers and sales and marketing personnel; and |
• | our ability to protect our intellectual property. |
Consumers may prefer to purchase from their existing suppliers rather than a new supplier regardless of product performance or features. In the event a consumer decides to evaluate a new home automation, security monitoring, video monitoring, energy management, or wellness solution, the consumer may be more inclined to select one of our competitors whose product offerings are broader than those that we offer.
Our current competitors include providers of other technology platforms for the connected property with interactive security, including Honeywell International Inc., Telular Corporation, SecureNet Technologies, LLC, Ring Inc., IPR, Inc. (formed following
48
the merger of ipDatatel, LLC and Resolution Products, LLC), and United Technologies Corporation, which sell solutions to service providers, cable operators, technology retailers and other residential and commercial automation providers. We also compete with interactive, monitored security solutions sold directly to subscribers by firms like Scout and SimpliSafe. In addition, our service provider partners compete with managed service providers, such as cable television, telephone and broadband companies like Comcast, AT&T Inc. and Charter Communications, Inc., and providers of point products, including Google Inc.'s Nest Labs, Inc. which offers the Nest Secure security system as well as a smart thermostat, the Nest Protect smart smoke detector and video cameras. Amazon.com offers Amazon Home Services security packages with bundled equipment and professional installation, a security camera and smart lock integration feature, Amazon Key, and recently acquired Ring Inc., which offers a connected video doorbell, video cameras, and an integrated security system, Ring Alarm. Samsung's SmartThings offers a security system and a home automation and awareness hub. Apple Inc. offers a feature that allows some manufacturers’ connected devices and accessories to be controlled through its HomeKit service available in Apple’s iOS operating system. Additionally, Lowes, Canary and other companies offer all in one video monitoring and awareness devices. In addition, we may compete with other large technology companies that offer control capabilities among their products, applications and services, and have ongoing development efforts to address the broader connected home market.
Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical, sales, marketing, distribution and other resources than we have. We expect to encounter new competitors as we enter new markets as well as increased competition, both domestically and internationally, from other established and emerging home automation, security monitoring, video monitoring and automation, wellness, and energy management companies as well as large technology companies. In addition, there may be new technologies that are introduced that reduce demand for our solutions or make them obsolete. Our current and potential competitors may also establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties and rapidly acquire significant market share. Increased competition could also result in price reductions and loss of market share, any of which could result in lower revenue and negatively affect our ability to grow our business.
Aggressive business tactics by our competitors may reduce our revenue.
Increased competition in the markets in which we compete may result in aggressive business tactics by our competitors, including:
• | selling at a discount; |
• | offering products similar to our platforms and solutions on a bundled basis at no charge; |
• | announcing competing products combined with extensive marketing efforts; |
• | providing financing incentives to consumers; and |
• | asserting intellectual property rights irrespective of the validity of the claims. |
Our service provider partners may switch and offer the products and services of competing companies, which would adversely affect our sales and profitability. Competition from other companies may also adversely affect our negotiations with service provider partners and suppliers, including, in some cases, requiring us to lower our prices. Opportunities to take market share using innovative products, services and sales approaches may also attract new entrants to the field. We may not be able to compete successfully with the offerings and sales tactics of other companies, which could result in the loss of service provider partners offering our platforms and solutions and, as a result, our revenue and profitability could be adversely affected.
If we fail to compete successfully against our current and future competitors, or if our current or future competitors employ aggressive business tactics, including those described above, demand for our platforms and solutions could decline, we could experience cancellations of our services to consumers, or we could be required to reduce our prices or increase our expenses.
The proper and efficient functioning of our network operations centers and data back-up systems is central to our solutions.
Our solutions operate with a hosted architecture and we update our solutions regularly while our solutions are operating. If our solutions and/or upgrades fail to operate properly, our solutions could stop functioning for a period of time, which could put our users at risk. Our ability to keep our business operating is highly dependent on the proper and efficient operation of our network operations centers and data back-up systems. Although our network operations centers have back-up computer and power systems, if there is a catastrophic event, natural disaster, terrorist attack, security breach or other extraordinary event, we may be unable to provide our subscribers with uninterrupted monitoring service. Furthermore, because data back-up systems are susceptible to malfunctions and interruptions (including those due to equipment damage, power outages, human error, computer viruses, computer hacking, data corruption and a range of other hardware, software and network problems), we cannot guarantee that we will not experience data back-up failures in the future. A significant or large-scale, security breach, malfunction or interruption of our network operations centers or data back-up systems could adversely affect our ability to keep
49
our operations running efficiently. If a malfunction or security breach results in a wider or sustained disruption, it could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
We sell security and life safety solutions and if our solutions fail for any reason, we could be subject to liability and our business could suffer.
We sell security and life safety solutions, which are designed to secure the safety of our subscribers and their residences or commercial properties. If these solutions fail for any reason, including due to defects in our software, a carrier outage, a failure of our network operating center, a failure on the part of one of our service provider partners or user error, we could be subject to liability for such failures and our business could suffer.
Our platforms and solutions may contain undetected defects in the software, infrastructure, third-party components or processes. If our platforms or solutions suffer from defects, we could experience harm to our branded reputation, claims by our subscribers or service provider partners or lost revenue during the period required to address the cause of the defects. We may find defects in new, acquired or upgraded solutions, resulting in loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of our platforms and solutions, which could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
Since solutions that enable our platforms are installed by our service provider partners, if they do not install or maintain such solutions correctly, our platforms and solutions may not function properly. If the improper installation or maintenance of our platforms and solutions leads to service or equipment failures after introduction of, or an upgrade to, our platforms or a solution, we could experience harm to our branded reputation, claims by our subscribers or service provider partners or lost revenue during the period required to address the cause of the problem. Further, we rely on our service provider partners to provide the primary source of support and ongoing service to our subscribers and, if our service provider partners fail to provide an adequate level of support and services to our subscribers, it could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
Any defect in, or disruption to, our platforms and solutions could cause consumers not to purchase additional solutions from us, prevent potential consumers from purchasing our platforms and solutions or harm our reputation. Although our contracts with our service provider partners limit our liability to our service provider partners for these defects, disruptions or errors, we nonetheless could be subject to litigation for actual or alleged losses to our service provider partners or our subscribers, which may require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or arbitration, or to pay significant settlements or damages. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be costly, divert management's attention and affect our ability to obtain or maintain liability insurance on acceptable terms and could harm our business. Although we currently maintain some warranty reserves, we cannot assure you that these warranty reserves will be sufficient to cover future liabilities.
We rely on our service provider partner network to acquire additional subscribers, and the inability of our service provider partners to attract additional subscribers or retain their current subscribers could adversely affect our operating results.
Substantially all of our revenue is generated through the sales of our platforms and solutions by our service provider partners, who incorporate our solutions in certain of the products and packages they sell to their customers, and our service provider partners are responsible for subscriber acquisition, as well as providing customer service and technical support for our platforms and solutions to the subscribers. We provide our service provider partners with specific training and programs to assist them in selling and providing support for our platforms and solutions, but we cannot assure that these steps will be effective. In addition, we rely on our service provider partners to sell our platforms and solutions into new markets in the intelligent and connected property space. If our service provider partners are unsuccessful in marketing, selling and supporting our platforms and solutions, our operating results could be adversely affected.
In order for us to maintain our current revenue sources and grow our revenues, we must effectively manage and grow relationships with our service provider partners. Recruiting and retaining qualified service provider partners and training them in our technology and solutions requires significant time and resources. If we fail to maintain existing service provider partners or develop relationships with new service provider partners, our revenue and operating results would be adversely affected. In addition, to execute on our strategy to expand our sales internationally, we must develop relationships with service provider partners that sell into these markets.
Any of our service provider partners may choose to offer a product from one of our competitors instead of our platforms and solutions, elect to develop their own competing solutions or simply discontinue their operations with us. For example, we entered into a license agreement in November 2013 with Vivint Inc., or Vivint, pursuant to which we granted a license to use the intellectual property associated with our connected home solutions. Under the terms of this arrangement, Vivint has transitioned from selling our solutions directly to its customers to selling its own home automation product to its new customers. We now generate revenue from a monthly fee charged to Vivint on a per customer basis from sales of this service provider partner’s product; however, these monthly fees are less on a per customer basis than fees we receive from our SaaS solutions. Therefore, we receive less revenue on a per customer basis from Vivint compared to our SaaS subscriber base, which may result in a lower revenue growth rate. We must also work to expand our network of service provider partners to ensure that we have sufficient geographic coverage and technical expertise to address new markets and technologies. While it is difficult to estimate the total
50
number of available service provider partners in our markets, there are a finite number of service provider partners that are able to perform the types of technical installations required for our platforms and solutions. In the event that we saturate the available service provider pool, or if market or other forces cause the available pool of service providers to decline, it may be increasingly difficult to grow our business. If we are unable to expand our network of service provider partners, our business could be harmed.
As the consumers’ product and service options grow, it is important that we enhance our service provider partner footprint by broadening the expertise of our service provider partners, working with larger and more sophisticated service provider partners and expanding the mainstream solutions our service provider partners offer. If we do not succeed in this effort, our current and potential future service provider partners may be unable or unwilling to broaden their offerings to include our connected property solutions, resulting in harm to our business.
We receive a substantial portion of our revenue from a limited number of service provider partners, and the loss of, or a significant reduction in, orders from one or more of our major service provider partners would result in decreased revenue and profitability.
Our success is highly dependent upon establishing and maintaining successful relationships with a variety of service provider partners. We market and sell our platforms and solutions through a channel assisted sales model and we derive substantially all of our revenue from these service provider partners. We generally enter into agreements with our service provider partners outlining the terms of our relationship, including service provider pricing commitments, installation, maintenance and support requirements, and our sales registration process for registering potential sales to subscribers. These contracts typically have an initial term of one year, with subsequent renewal terms of one year, and are terminable at the end of the initial term or renewal terms without cause upon written notice to the other party. In some cases, these contracts provide the service provider partner with the right to terminate prior to the expiration of the term without cause upon 30 days written notice, or, in the case of certain termination events, the right to terminate the contract immediately. While we have developed a network of over 7,000 service provider partners to sell, install and support our platforms and solutions, we receive a substantial portion of our revenue from a limited number of channel partners and significant customers. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, our 10 largest revenue service provider partners accounted for 60%, 60% and 63% of our revenue. Monitronics International, Inc. represented greater than 15% but not more than 20% of our revenue in 2015 and greater than 10% but not more than 15% of our revenue in 2016 and 2017. ADT LLC represented greater than 15% but not more than 20% of our revenue in 2017.
We anticipate that we will continue to be dependent upon a limited number of service provider partners for a significant portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future and, in some cases, a portion of our revenue attributable to individual service provider partners may increase in the future. The loss of one or more key service provider partners, a reduction in sales through any major service provider partners or the inability or unwillingness of any of our major service provider partners to pay for our platforms and solutions would reduce our revenue and could impair our profitability.
Substantially all of the Connect platform revenues are from a single customer and the loss of this customer could harm our operating results.
In March 2017, we acquired certain assets related to the Connect business unit of Icontrol Networks, Inc., or Icontrol, and all of the outstanding equity interests of the two subsidiaries through which Icontrol conducts its Piper business, which we refer to in this report as the Acquisition. Historically, ADT LLC, or ADT, has accounted for substantially all of the revenues of the Connect business unit. While we amended our master service agreement with ADT to cover services provided with respect to the Connect platform, we cannot assure you that we will be able to meet the conditions set forth in the amended agreement or that ADT will use the Connect platform for its new customers or keep its existing customers on the Connect platform. In addition, even if ADT continues to use the Connect platform, we cannot assure you that the revenues from ADT or new accounts added by ADT will reach or exceed historical levels in any future period. We may not be able to offset any unanticipated decline in revenues from ADT with revenues from new customers or other existing customers. Because the Connect platform relies on ADT for substantially all of its revenue, any negative developments in ADT’s business, or any decrease in revenues from or loss of ADT as a customer could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We have relatively limited visibility regarding the consumers that ultimately purchase our solutions, and we often rely on information from third-party service providers to help us manage our business. If these service providers fail to provide timely or accurate information, our ability to quickly react to market changes and effectively manage our business may be harmed.
We sell our solutions through service provider partners. These service provider partners work with consumers to design, install, update and maintain their connected home and commercial installations and manage the relationship with our subscribers. While we are able to track orders from service provider partners and have access to certain information about the configurations of their Alarm.com systems that we receive through our platforms, we also rely on service provider partners to provide us with information about consumer behavior, product and system feedback, consumer demographics and buying patterns. We use this channel sell-through data, along with other metrics, to forecast our revenue, assess consumer demand for our solution, develop new solutions, adjust pricing and make other strategic business decisions. Channel sell-through data is
51
subject to limitations due to collection methods and the third-party nature of the data and thus may not be complete or accurate. If we do not receive consumer information on a timely or accurate basis, or if we do not properly interpret this information, our ability to quickly react to market changes and effectively manage our business may be harmed.
Consumers may choose to adopt point products that provide control of discrete functions rather than adopting our connected property platforms. If we are unable to increase market awareness of the benefits of our unified solutions, our revenue may not continue to grow, or it may decline.
Many vendors have emerged, and may continue to emerge, to provide point products with advanced functionality for use in connected properties, such as a thermostat that can be controlled by an application on a smartphone. We expect more and more consumer electronic and consumer appliance products to be network-aware and connected — each very likely to have its own smart device (phone or tablet) application. Consumers may be attracted to the relatively low costs of these point products and the ability to expand their connected property control solution over time with minimal upfront costs, despite some of the disadvantages of this approach, may reduce demand for our connected property solutions. If so, our service provider partners may switch and offer the point products and services of competing companies, which would adversely affect our sales and profitability. If a significant number of consumers in our target market choose to adopt point products rather than our connected property solutions, then our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations will be harmed, and we may not be able to achieve sustained growth or our business may decline.
Mergers or other strategic transactions involving our competitors could weaken our competitive position, which could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively and harm our results of operations.
Our industry is highly fragmented, and we believe it is likely that some of our existing competitors will consolidate or be acquired. In addition, some of our competitors may enter into new alliances with each other or may establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with systems integrators, third-party consulting firms or other parties. Any such consolidation, acquisition, alliance or cooperative relationship could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively and lead to pricing pressure and our loss of market share and could result in a competitor with greater financial, technical, marketing, service and other resources, all of which could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We are dependent on our connected property solutions, and the lack of continued market acceptance of our connected property solutions would result in lower revenue.
Our connected property solutions account for substantially all of our revenue and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. As a result, our revenue could be reduced by:
• | any decline in demand for our connected property solutions; |
• | the failure of our connected property solutions to achieve continued market acceptance; |
• | the introduction of products and technologies that serve as a replacement or substitute for, or represent an improvement over, our connected property solutions; |
• | technological innovations or new communications standards that our connected property solutions do not address; and |
• | our inability to release enhanced versions of our connected property solutions on a timely basis. |
We are vulnerable to fluctuations in demand for Internet-connected devices in general and interactive security systems in particular. If the market for connected home and commercial solutions grows more slowly than anticipated or if demand for connected home and commercial solutions does not grow as quickly as anticipated, whether as a result of competition, product obsolescence, technological change, unfavorable economic conditions, uncertain geopolitical environments, budgetary constraints of our consumers or other factors, we may not be able to continue to increase our revenue and earnings and our stock price would decline.
A significant decline in our SaaS and license revenue renewal rate would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We generally bill our service provider partners based on the number of subscribers they have on our platforms and the features being utilized by subscribers on a monthly basis in advance. Subscribers could elect to terminate our services in any given month. If our efforts and our service provider partners’ efforts to satisfy our existing subscribers are not successful, we may not be able to retain them or sell additional functionality to them and, as a result, our revenue and ability to grow could be adversely affected. We track our SaaS and license revenue renewal rate on an annualized basis, as reflected in the section of this Quarterly Report titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Other Business Metrics — SaaS and License Revenue Renewal Rate.” However, our service provider partners, who resell our services to our subscribers, have indicated that they typically have three to five-year service contracts with our subscribers. Our SaaS and license revenue renewal rate is calculated across our entire subscriber base, including subscribers whose contract with their
52
service provider reached the end of its contractual term during the measurement period, as well as subscribers whose contract with their service provider has not reached the end of its contractual term during the measurement period, and is not intended to estimate the rate at which our subscribers renew their contracts with our service provider partners. As a result, we may not be able to accurately predict future trends in renewals and the resulting churn. Subscribers may choose not to renew their contracts for many reasons, including the belief that our service is not required for their needs or is otherwise not cost-effective, a desire to reduce discretionary spending, or a belief that our competitors’ services provide better value. Additionally, our subscribers may not renew for reasons entirely out of our control, such as moving a residence or the dissolution of their business, which is particularly common for small to mid-sized businesses. A significant increase in our churn would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
If we are unable to develop new solutions, sell our platforms and solutions into new markets or further penetrate our existing markets, our revenue may not grow as expected.
Our ability to increase sales will depend, in large part, on our ability to enhance and improve our platforms and solutions, introduce new solutions in a timely manner, sell into new markets and further penetrate our existing markets. The success of any enhancement or new solution or service depends on several factors, including the timely completion, introduction and market acceptance of enhanced or new solutions, the ability to maintain and develop relationships with service providers, the ability to attract, retain and effectively train sales and marketing personnel and the effectiveness of our marketing programs. Any new product or service we develop or acquire may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner, and may not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenue. Any new markets into which we attempt to sell our platforms and solutions, including new vertical markets and new countries or regions, may not be receptive. Our ability to further penetrate our existing markets depends on the quality of our platforms and solutions and our ability to design our platforms and solutions to meet consumer demand.
We benefit from integration of our solutions with third-party security platform providers. If these developers choose not to partner with us, or are acquired by our competitors, our business and results of operations may be harmed.
Our solutions are incorporated into the hardware of our third-party security platform providers. For example, our hardware platform partners produce control devices that deliver our platform services to subscribers. It may be necessary in the future to renegotiate agreements relating to various aspects of these solutions or other third-party solutions. The inability to easily integrate with, or any defects in, any third-party solutions could result in increased costs, or in delays in new product releases or updates to our existing solutions until such issues have been resolved, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and future prospects and could damage our reputation. In addition, if these third-party solution providers choose not to partner with us, choose to integrate their solutions with our competitors’ platforms, or are unable or unwilling to update their solutions, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be harmed. Further, if third-party solution providers that we partner with or that we would benefit from partnering with are acquired by our competitors, they may choose not to offer their solutions on our platforms, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We rely on wireless carriers to provide access to wireless networks through which we provide our wireless alarm, notification and intelligent automation services, and any interruption of such access would impair our business.
We rely on wireless carriers to provide access to wireless networks for machine-to-machine data transmissions, which are an integral part of our services. Our wireless carriers may suspend wireless service to expand, maintain or improve their networks. Any suspension or other interruption of services would adversely affect our ability to provide our services to our service provider partners and subscribers and may adversely affect our reputation. In addition, the inability to provide uninterrupted services, maintain our existing contracts with our wireless carriers or enter into new contracts with such wireless carriers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
If we are unable to adapt to technological change, including maintaining compatibility with a wide range of devices, our ability to remain competitive could be impaired.
The market for connected home and commercial solutions is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent introductions of new products and evolving industry standards. Our ability to attract new subscribers and increase revenue from existing subscribers will depend in significant part on our ability to anticipate changes in industry standards, to continue to enhance our existing solutions or introduce new solutions on a timely basis to keep pace with technological developments, and to maintain compatibility with a wide range of connected devices in residential and commercial properties. We may change aspects of our platforms and may utilize open source technology in the future, which may cause difficulties including compatibility, stability and time to market. The success of this or any enhanced or new product or solution will depend on several factors, including the timely completion and market acceptance of the enhanced or new product or solution. Similarly, if any of our competitors implement new technologies before we are able to implement them, those competitors may be able to provide more effective products than ours, possibly at lower prices. Any delay or failure in the introduction of new or enhanced solutions could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
53
The technology we employ may become obsolete, and we may need to incur significant capital expenditures to update our technology.
Our industry is characterized by rapid technological innovation. Our platforms and solutions interact with the hardware and software technology of systems and devices located at our subscribers’ properties and we depend upon cellular, broadband and other telecommunications providers to provide communication paths to our subscribers in a timely and efficient manner. We may be required to implement new technologies or adapt existing technologies in response to changing market conditions, consumer preferences or industry standards, which could require significant capital expenditures. The discontinuation of cellular communication technology or other services by telecommunications service providers can affect our services and require our subscribers to upgrade to alternative and potentially more expensive, technologies. For example, AT&T shut down its 2G network on December 31, 2016. To maintain our subscriber base which relied on the now obsolete AT&T 2G network we subsidized the upgrade of the subscribers' outdated systems. If our service provider partners are not able to upgrade their customers then those accounts may be terminated with Alarm.com.
It is also possible that one or more of our competitors could develop a significant technical advantage that allows them to provide additional or superior quality products or services, or to lower their price for similar products or services, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage. Our inability to adapt to changing technologies, market conditions or consumer preferences in a timely manner could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
We depend on our suppliers, and the loss of any key supplier could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Our hardware products depend on the quality of components that we procure from third-party suppliers. Reliance on suppliers, as well as industry supply conditions, generally involves several risks, including the possibility of defective parts, which can adversely affect the reliability and reputation of our platforms and solutions, and a shortage of components and reduced control over delivery schedules and increases in component costs, which can adversely affect our profitability. We have several large hardware suppliers from which we procure hardware on a purchase order basis, including one supplier that supplied products and components in an amount equal to 25% of our hardware and other revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018. If these suppliers are unable to continue to provide a timely and reliable supply, we could experience interruptions in delivery of our platforms and solutions to our service provider partners, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. If we were required to find alternative sources of supply, qualification of alternative suppliers and the establishment of reliable supplies could result in delays and a possible loss of sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Growth of our business will depend on market awareness and a strong brand, and any failure to develop, maintain, protect and enhance our brand would hurt our ability to retain or attract subscribers.
We believe that building and maintaining market awareness, brand recognition and goodwill in a cost-effective manner is important to our overall success in achieving widespread acceptance of our existing and future solutions and is an important element in attracting new service provider partners and subscribers. An important part of our business strategy is to increase service provider and consumer awareness of our brand and to provide marketing leadership, services and support to our service provider partner network. This will depend largely on our ability to continue to provide high-quality solutions, and we may not be able to do so effectively. While we may choose to engage in a broader marketing campaign to further promote our brand, this effort may not be successful. Our efforts in developing our brand may be hindered by the marketing efforts of our competitors and our reliance on our service provider partners and strategic partners to promote our brand. If we are unable to cost-effectively maintain and increase awareness of our brand, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be harmed.
We operate in the emerging and evolving connected property market, which may develop more slowly or differently than we expect. If the connected property market does not grow as we expect, or if we cannot expand our platforms and solutions to meet the demands of this market, our revenue may decline, fail to grow or fail to grow at an accelerated rate, and we may incur operating losses.
The market for solutions that bring objects and systems not typically connected to the Internet, such as home automation, security monitoring, video monitoring, energy management, and wellness solutions, into an Internet-like structure is in an early stage of development, and it is uncertain whether, how rapidly or how consistently this market will develop, and even if it does develop, whether our platforms and solutions will be accepted into the markets in which we operate. Some consumers may be reluctant or unwilling to use our platforms and solutions for a number of reasons, including satisfaction with traditional solutions, concerns about additional costs and lack of awareness of the benefits of our platforms and solutions. Our ability to expand the sales of our platforms and solutions into new markets depends on several factors, including the awareness of our platforms and solutions, the timely completion, introduction and market acceptance of our platforms and solutions, the ability to attract, retain and effectively train sales and marketing personnel, the ability to develop relationships with service providers, the effectiveness of our marketing programs, the costs of our platforms and solutions and the success of our competitors. If we are unsuccessful in developing and marketing our platforms and solutions into new markets, or if consumers do not perceive or value the benefits
54
of our platforms and solutions, the market for our platforms and solutions might not continue to develop or might develop more slowly than we expect, either of which would harm our revenue and growth prospects.
Risks of liability from our operations are significant.
The nature of the solutions we provide, including our interactive security solutions, potentially exposes us to greater risks of liability for employee acts or omissions, or technology or system failure than may be inherent in other businesses. Substantially all of our service provider partner agreements contain provisions limiting our liability to service provider partners and our subscribers in an attempt to reduce this risk. However, in the event of litigation with respect to these matters, we cannot assure you that these limitations will be enforced, and the costs of such litigation could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, there can be no assurance that we are adequately insured for these risks. Certain of our insurance policies and the laws of some states may limit or prohibit insurance coverage for punitive or certain other types of damages or liability arising from gross negligence.
Failure to maintain the security of our information and technology networks, including information relating to our service provider partners, subscribers and employees, could adversely affect us.
We are dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information and, in the normal course of our business, we collect and retain certain information pertaining to our service provider partners, subscribers and employees, including credit card information for many of our service provider partners and certain of our subscribers. If security breaches in connection with the delivery of our solutions allow unauthorized third parties to access any of this data or obtain control of our subscribers’ systems, our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be harmed.
The legal, regulatory and contractual environment surrounding information security, privacy and credit card fraud is constantly evolving and companies that collect and retain such information are under increasing attack by cyber-criminals around the world. Further, as the regulatory focus on privacy issues continues to increase and worldwide laws and regulations concerning the protection of personal information expand and become more complex, these potential risks to our business will intensify. A significant actual or potential theft, loss, fraudulent use or misuse of service provider partner, subscriber, employee or other personally identifiable data, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in loss of confidential information, damage to our reputation, early termination of our service provider partner contracts, significant costs, fines, litigation, regulatory investigations or actions and other liabilities or actions against us. Moreover, to the extent that any such exposure leads to credit card fraud or identity theft, we may experience a general decline in consumer confidence in our business, which may lead to an increase in attrition rates or may make it more difficult to attract new subscribers. If any one of these risks materializes our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
If our security measures are breached, including any breaches caused by cyber-attacks, our reputation may be damaged, we may be exposed to significant liabilities under U.S. and foreign laws, and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Cyber-attacks from computer hackers and cyber criminals and other malicious Internet-based activity continue to increase generally, and perpetrators of cyber-attacks may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, ransomware, malware, DNS attacks, wireless network attacks, phishing attempts, distributed denial of service attacks and other malicious software programs that attack our products and services, our networks or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products, services and networks. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. We cannot be certain that advances in cyber-capabilities or other developments will not compromise or breach the technology protecting the networks that access our platforms and solutions, and we can make no assurance that we will be able to detect, prevent, timely and adequately address or mitigate the negative effects of cyber-attacks or other security breaches.
Security breaches of, or sustained attacks against, our networks and infrastructure could create system disruptions and shutdowns that could result in disruptions to our operations. Such an event could result in adverse publicity and therefore adversely affect the market's perception of the security and reliability of our services. A cyber-attack may cause additional costs, such as investigative and remediation costs, and the costs of providing individuals and/or data owners with notice of the breach, legal fees and the costs of any additional fraud detection activities required by law, a court or a third-party. Additionally, some of our customer contracts require us to indemnify customers from damages they may incur as a result of a breach of our networks and systems. There can be no assurance that the limitation of liability provisions in our contracts for a security breach would be enforceable or would otherwise protect us from any such liabilities or damages with respect to any particular claim. While we maintain general liability insurance coverage and coverage for errors or omissions, we cannot assure you that such coverage will be available in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims related to a breach, will continue to be available on acceptable terms or at all. If any one of these risks materializes our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
55
Our strategy includes pursuing acquisitions, and our potential inability to successfully integrate newly-acquired technologies, assets or businesses may harm our financial results. Future acquisitions of technologies, assets or businesses, which are paid for partially or entirely through the issuance of stock or stock rights, could dilute the ownership of our existing stockholders.
On March 8, 2017, we acquired Icontrol's Connect and Piper business units and we have acquired other businesses in the past. For example, we acquired EnergyHub, Inc. in 2013, we acquired the assets of Horizon Analog, Inc. and Secure-i, Inc., respectively, in December 2014, we acquired the assets of HiValley Technology Inc. in March 2015 and we acquired certain assets of ObjectVideo, Inc. in January 2017. We believe part of our growth will continue to be driven by acquisitions of other companies or their technologies, assets and businesses. These acquisitions and any other acquisitions we may complete in the future will give rise to certain risks, including:
• | incurring higher than anticipated capital expenditures and operating expenses; |
• | failing to assimilate and integrate the operations and personnel or failing to retain the key personnel of the acquired company or business; |
• | Failing to retain customers, service providers and other third-party business partners seeking to terminate or renegotiate their relationships with us; |
• | failing to integrate the acquired technologies, or incurring significant expense to integrate acquired technologies into our platforms and solutions; |
• | disrupting our ongoing business; |
• | encountering complexities associated with managing the larger, more complex business; |
• | diverting our management’s attention and other company resources; |
• | failing to maintain uniform standards, controls and policies; |
• | incurring significant accounting charges; |
• | impairing relationships with employees, service provider partners or subscribers; |
• | finding that the acquired technology, asset or business does not further our business strategy, that we overpaid for the technology, asset or business or that we may be required to write off acquired assets or investments partially or entirely; |
• | failing to realize the expected synergies of the transaction; |
• | being exposed to unforeseen liabilities and contingencies that were not identified prior to acquiring the company; and |
• | being unable to generate sufficient revenue and profits from acquisitions to offset the associated acquisition costs. |
Fully integrating an acquired technology, asset or business into our operations may take a significant amount of time. We may not be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered with acquisitions. To the extent we do not successfully avoid or overcome the risks or problems related to any such acquisitions, or fail to manage the acquired business or execute our integration and growth strategy in an efficient and effective manner, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be harmed. Acquisitions also could impact our financial position and capital requirements, or could cause fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results of operations. Acquisitions could include significant goodwill and intangible assets, which may result in future impairment charges that would reduce our stated earnings. We may incur significant costs in our efforts to engage in strategic transactions and these expenditures may not result in successful acquisitions.
We expect that the consideration we might pay for any future acquisitions of technologies, assets or businesses could include stock, rights to purchase stock, cash or some combination of the foregoing. If we issue stock or rights to purchase stock in connection with future acquisitions, net income per share and then-existing holders of our common stock may experience dilution.
We may pursue business opportunities that diverge from our current business model, which may cause our business to suffer.
We may pursue business opportunities that diverge from our current business model, including expanding our platforms and solutions and investing in new and unproven technologies. We can offer no assurance that any such new business opportunities will prove to be successful. Among other negative effects, our pursuit of such business opportunities could reduce operating
56
margins and require more working capital, subject us to additional federal state, and local laws and regulations, materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
Evolving government and industry regulation and changes in applicable laws relating to the Internet and data privacy may increase our expenditures related to compliance efforts or otherwise limit the solutions we can offer, which may harm our business and adversely affect our financial condition.
As Internet commerce continues to evolve, federal, state or foreign agencies have adopted and could in the future adopt regulations covering issues such as user privacy and content. We are particularly sensitive to these risks because the Internet is a critical component of our SaaS business model. In addition, taxation of products or services provided over the Internet or other charges imposed by government agencies or by private organizations for accessing the Internet may be imposed. Any regulation imposing greater fees for Internet use or restricting information exchange over the Internet could result in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of Internet-based services, which could harm our business.
Our platforms and solutions enable us to collect, manage and store a wide range of data related to our subscribers’ interactive security, intelligent automation, video monitoring, energy management and wellness systems. A valuable component of our platforms and solutions is our ability to analyze this data to present the user with actionable business intelligence. We obtain our data from a variety of sources, including our service provider partners, our subscribers and third-party providers. We cannot assure you that the data we require for our proprietary data sets will be available from these sources in the future or that the cost of such data will not increase. The United States federal government and various state governments have adopted or proposed limitations on the collection, distribution, storage and use of personal information. Several foreign jurisdictions, including the European Union and the United Kingdom, have adopted legislation (including directives or regulations) that is more rigorous governing data collection and storage than in the United States.
The United States and the European Union, or EU, have a cooperative program for transferring personal data, referred to as the Privacy Shield, that went into effect on August 1, 2016. We self-certified our compliance with the Privacy Shield framework in September 2016, and we use Model Contracts to transfer personal data from the EU to the United States in compliance with the European Commission’s Directive on Data Protection. However, the validity of these data transfer mechanisms is currently being challenged in EU courts, including the European Court of Justice, and by the EU Parliament. The EU has issued a new General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, that went into effect on May 25, 2018. As a result of these ongoing challenges there will continue to be significant regulatory uncertainty surrounding the validity of data transfers from the EU to the United States, as well as the processing of personal data of EU persons. If our privacy or data security measures are deemed or perceived to be in noncompliance with current or future laws and regulations, we may be subject to litigation, regulatory investigations or other liabilities. Further, in the event of a breach of personal information that we hold, we may be subject to governmental fines, individual claims, remediation expenses and/or harm to our reputation. Moreover, if future laws and regulations limit our ability to use and share this data or our ability to store, process and share data over the Internet, demand for our platforms and solutions could decrease, our costs could increase, and our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be harmed.
In April 2018, we introduced a solution for certain service provider partners who may be subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, and its implementing regulations, or HIPAA, which regulates the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information, or PHI. As a result, we are subject to HIPAA when PHI is accessed, created, maintained or transmitted through our solution by these service provider partners. We have implemented additional privacy and security policies and procedures, as well as administrative, physical and technical safeguards to enable our solution to be HIPAA compliant. Additionally, HIPAA compliance has required us to put in place certain agreements with contracting partners and to appoint a Privacy Officer and Security Officer. If our privacy and security policies or other safeguards for PHI are deemed to be in noncompliance by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, we may be subject to litigation, regulatory investigations or other liabilities. Further, in the event of a breach of PHI that we hold, we may be subject to governmental fines, individual claims under state privacy laws governing personal health information, remediation expenses and/or harm to our reputation. Furthermore, if future changes to HIPAA or state privacy laws governing PHI expand the definition of PHI or put more restrictions on our ability to use, process and store PHI, then HIPAA compliance for our solutions as currently constituted may be costly both financially and in terms of administrative resources. Ongoing compliance efforts may take substantial time and require the assistance of external resources, such as attorneys, information technology, and/or other consultants and advisors.
We rely on the performance of our senior management and highly skilled personnel, and if we are unable to attract, retain and motivate well-qualified employees, our business and results of operations could be harmed.
We believe our success has depended, and continues to depend, on the efforts and talents of senior management and key personnel, including Stephen Trundle, our Chief Executive Officer, and our senior information technology managers. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled employees. Qualified individuals are in high demand, and we may incur significant costs to attract them. In addition, the loss of any of our senior management or key personnel could interrupt our ability to execute our business plan, as such individuals may be difficult to replace. If we do not succeed in attracting well-qualified employees or retaining and motivating existing employees, our business and results of operations could be harmed.
57
We provide minimum service level commitments to certain of our service provider partners, and our failure to meet them could cause us to issue credits for future services or pay penalties, which could harm our results of operations.
Certain of our service provider partner agreements currently, and may in the future, provide minimum service level commitments regarding items such as uptime, functionality or performance. If we are unable to meet the stated service level commitments for these service provider partners or suffer extended periods of service unavailability, we are or may be contractually obligated to provide these service provider partners with credits for future services, provide services at no cost or pay other penalties, which could adversely impact our revenue. We do not currently have any reserves on our balance sheet for these commitments.
We have indemnity obligations to certain of our service provider partners for certain expenses and liabilities, which could force us to incur substantial costs.
We have indemnity obligations to certain of our service provider partners for certain claims regarding our platforms and solutions, including security breach, product recall, epidemic failure, and product liability claims. As a result, in the case of any such claims against these service provider partners, we could be required to indemnify them for losses resulting from such claims or to refund amounts they have paid to us. We expect that some of our service provider partners may seek indemnification from us in the event that such claims are brought against them. In addition, we may elect to indemnify service provider partners where we have no contractual obligation to do so and we will evaluate each such request on a case-by-case basis. If a service provider partner elects to invest resources in enforcing a claim for indemnification against us, we could incur significant costs disputing it. If we do not succeed in disputing it, we could face substantial liability.
The Acquisition subjects us to significant additional liabilities for which we will not be indemnified.
In connection with the Acquisition, we assumed certain historic liabilities of the Connect and Piper business units, including pre-closing liabilities relating to current and former employees of the Connect and Piper business units, pre-closing compliance by the Connect and Piper business units with applicable laws and pre-closing performance by the Connect and Piper business units of the assumed contracts. In addition, we assumed any liabilities that may arise from certain pending intellectual property litigation. In addition to the known liabilities we assumed, there could be unasserted claims or assessments that we failed or were unable to discover or identify in the course of performing due diligence investigations and there may be liabilities that are neither probable nor estimable at this time which may become probable and estimable in the future. Further, while the terms of the Acquisition transaction documents provide for us to be indemnified for breaches of certain representations and warranties made about the Connect and Piper business units, the liabilities that arise may not entitle us to contractual indemnification or our contractual indemnification may not be effective. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business and our prospects.
We may not be able to secure additional financing on favorable terms, or at all, to meet our future capital needs.
In the future, we may require additional capital to respond to business opportunities, challenges, acquisitions or unforeseen circumstances and may determine to engage in equity or debt financings or enter into credit facilities for other reasons. In the future, we may not be able to timely secure debt or equity financing on favorable terms or at all. Any debt financing obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity, convertible debt securities or other securities convertible into equity, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution in their percentage ownership of our company, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to grow or support our business and to respond to business challenges could be limited.
Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets represent a significant portion of our total assets, and we may never realize the full value of our intangible assets.
As of June 30, 2018, we had $150.3 million of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. We review such assets for impairment at least annually. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in performance, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations, including changes that restrict the activities of or affect the solutions we offer, challenges to the validity of certain registered intellectual property, reduced sales of certain products or services incorporating registered intellectual property, increased attrition and a variety of other factors. The amount of any quantified impairment must be expensed immediately as a charge to results of operations. Depending on future circumstances, it is possible that we may never realize the full value of our intangible assets. Any future determination of impairment of goodwill or other identifiable intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
58
Comprehensive tax reform bills could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
The U.S. government has enacted comprehensive tax legislation that includes significant changes to the taxation of business entities. These changes include, among others, (i) a permanent reduction to the corporate income tax rate, (ii) a partial limitation on the deductibility of business interest expense, (iii) a shift of the U.S. taxation of multinational corporations from a tax on worldwide income to a territorial system (along with certain rules designed to prevent erosion of the U.S. income tax base) and (iv) a one-time tax on accumulated offshore earnings held in cash and illiquid assets, with the latter taxed at a lower rate. Notwithstanding the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the overall impact of this tax reform is uncertain, and our business and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We may be subject to additional tax liabilities, which would harm our results of operations.
We are subject to income, sales, use, value added and other taxes in the United States and other countries in which we conduct business, which laws and rates vary greatly by jurisdiction. Certain jurisdictions in which we do not collect sales, use, value added or other taxes on our sales may assert that such taxes are applicable, which could result in tax assessments, penalties and interest, and we may be required to collect such taxes in the future. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. These determinations are highly complex and require detailed analysis of the available information and applicable statutes and regulatory materials. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be different from our historical tax practices, provisions and accruals. If we receive an adverse ruling as a result of an audit, or we unilaterally determine that we have misinterpreted provisions of the tax regulations to which we are subject, our tax provision, results of operations or cash flows could be harmed. In addition, liabilities associated with taxes are often subject to an extended or indefinite statute of limitations period. Therefore, we may be subject to additional tax liability (including penalties and interest) for a particular year for extended periods of time.
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, power outages, floods and other catastrophic events, and to interruption by man-made problems such as terrorism or global or regional economic, political and social conditions.
A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, hurricane, fire, flood, or a significant power outage could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. Natural disasters could affect our hardware vendors, our wireless carriers or our network operations centers. Further, if a natural disaster occurs in a region from which we derive a significant portion of our revenue, such as metropolitan areas in North America, consumers in that region may delay or forego purchases of our platforms and solutions from service providers in the region, which may harm our results of operations for a particular period. In addition, terrorist acts or acts of war could cause disruptions in our business or the business of our hardware vendors, service providers, subscribers or the economy as a whole. More generally, these geopolitical, social and economic conditions could result in increased volatility in worldwide financial markets and economies that could harm our sales. Given our concentration of sales during the second and third quarters, any disruption in the business of our hardware vendors, service provider partners or subscribers that impacts sales during the second or third quarter of each year could have a greater impact on our annual results. All of the aforementioned risks may be augmented if the disaster recovery plans for us, our service provider partners and our suppliers prove to be inadequate. To the extent that any of the above results in delays or cancellations of orders, or delays in the manufacture, deployment or shipment of our platforms and solutions, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations would be harmed.
Downturns in general economic and market conditions and reductions in spending may reduce demand for our platforms and solutions, which could harm our revenue, results of operations and cash flows.
Our revenue, results of operations and cash flows depend on the overall demand for our platforms and solutions. Concerns about the systemic impact of a potential widespread recession, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit and the global housing and mortgage markets have contributed to increased market volatility, decreased consumer confidence and diminished growth expectations in the U.S. economy and abroad. The current unstable general economic and market conditions have been characterized by a dramatic decline in consumer discretionary spending and have disproportionately affected providers of solutions that represent discretionary purchases. While the decline in consumer spending has recently moderated, these economic conditions could still lead to continued declines in consumer spending over the foreseeable future, and may have resulted in a resetting of consumer spending habits that may make it unlikely that such spending will return to prior levels for the foreseeable future.
During weak economic times, the available pool of service providers may decline as the prospects for home building and home renovation projects diminish, which may have a corresponding impact on our growth prospects. In addition, there is an increased risk during these periods that an increased percentage of our service provider partners will file for bankruptcy protection, which may harm our reputation, revenue, profitability and results of operations. In addition, we may determine that the cost of pursuing any claim may outweigh the recovery potential of such claim. Likewise, consumer bankruptcies can detrimentally affect the business stability of our service provider partners. Prolonged economic slowdowns and reductions in new home construction and renovation projects may result in diminished sales of our platforms and solutions. Further worsening,
59
broadening or protracted extension of the economic downturn could have a negative impact on our business, revenue, results of operations and cash flows.
Failure to comply with laws and regulations could harm our business.
We conduct our business in the United States and are expanding internationally in various other countries. We are subject to regulation by various federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies, including, but not limited to, agencies responsible for monitoring and enforcing employment and labor laws, workplace safety, product safety, environmental laws, consumer protection laws, antitrust laws, federal securities laws and tax laws and regulations.
We are subject to the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, the U.S. Travel Act, and possibly other anti-bribery laws, including those that comply with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD, Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and other international conventions. Anti-corruption laws are interpreted broadly and prohibit our company from authorizing, offering, or providing directly or indirectly improper payments or benefits to recipients in the public or private-sector. Certain laws could also prohibit us from soliciting or accepting bribes or kickbacks. Our company has direct government interactions and in several cases uses third-party representatives, including dealers, for regulatory compliance, sales and other purposes in a variety of countries. These factors increase our anti-corruption risk profile. We can be held liable for the corrupt activities of our employees, representatives, contractors, partners and agents, even if we did not explicitly authorize such activity. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with anti-corruption laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, representatives, contractors, partners, and agents will comply with these laws and policies.
We are also subject to data privacy and security laws, anti-money laundering laws (such as the USA PATRIOT Act), and import/export laws and regulations in the United States and in other jurisdictions.
Our global operations require us to import from and export to several countries, which geographically stretches our compliance obligations. Our platforms and solutions are subject to export control and import laws and regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations, and various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls. Exports of our platforms and solutions must be made in compliance with these laws and regulations. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we and certain of our employees could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export or import privileges; fines, which may be imposed on us and responsible employees or managers; and, in extreme cases, the incarceration of responsible employees or managers. In addition, if our service provider partners fail to obtain appropriate import, export or re-export licenses or authorizations, we may also be adversely affected through reputational harm and penalties. Obtaining the necessary authorizations, including any required license, for a particular sale may be time-consuming, is not guaranteed and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. In addition, changes in our platforms or solutions or changes in applicable export or import laws and regulations may create delays in the introduction and sale of our platforms and solutions in international markets, prevent our service provider partners with international operations from deploying our platforms and solutions or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our platforms and solutions to certain countries, governments or persons altogether. Any change in export or import laws and regulations, shift in the enforcement or scope of existing laws and regulations, or change in the countries, governments, persons or technologies targeted by such laws and regulations, could also result in decreased use of our platforms and solutions, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our platforms and solutions to existing or potential service provider partners with international operations. Any decreased use of our platforms and solutions or limitation on our ability to export or sell our platforms and solutions would likely adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
In addition, our software contains encryption technologies, certain types of which are subject to U.S. and foreign export control regulations and, in some foreign countries, restrictions on importation and/or use. Any failure on our part to comply with encryption or other applicable export control requirements could result in financial penalties or other sanctions under the U.S. export regulations, including restrictions on future export activities, which could harm our business and operating results. Regulatory restrictions could impair our access to technologies needed to improve our platforms and solutions and may also limit or reduce the demand for our platforms and solutions outside of the United States.
Furthermore, U.S. export control laws and economic sanctions programs prohibit the shipment of certain products and services to countries, governments and persons that are subject to U.S. economic embargoes and trade sanctions. Even though we take precautions to prevent our platforms and solutions from being shipped or provided to U.S. sanctions targets, our platforms and solutions could be shipped to those targets or provided by third-parties despite such precautions. Any such shipment could have negative consequences, including government investigations, penalties and reputational harm. Furthermore, any new embargo or sanctions program, or any change in the countries, governments, persons or activities targeted by such programs, could result in decreased use of our platforms and solutions, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our platforms and solutions to existing or potential service provider partners, which would likely adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
60
Changes in laws that apply to us could result in increased regulatory requirements and compliance costs which could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. In certain jurisdictions, regulatory requirements may be more stringent than in the United States. Noncompliance with applicable regulations or requirements could subject us to whistleblower complaints, investigations, sanctions, settlements, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties or injunctions, suspension or debarment from contracting with certain governments or other customers, the loss of export privileges, multi-jurisdictional liability, reputational harm, and other collateral consequences. If any governmental or other sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal litigation, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be materially harmed. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a materially significant diversion of management’s attention and resources and an increase in defense costs and other professional fees. Enforcement actions and sanctions could further harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
If the U.S. insurance industry were to change its practice of providing incentives to homeowners for the use of alarm monitoring services, we could experience a reduction in new subscriber growth or an increase in our subscriber attrition rate.
It has been common practice in the U.S. insurance industry to provide a reduction in rates for policies written on residences that have monitored alarm systems. There can be no assurance that insurance companies will continue to offer these rate reductions. If these incentives were reduced or eliminated, new homeowners who otherwise may not feel the need for alarm monitoring services would be removed from our potential subscriber pool, which could hinder the growth of our business, and existing subscribers may choose to disconnect or not renew their service contracts, which could increase our attrition rates. In either case, our results of operations and growth prospects could be adversely affected.
We face many risks associated with our plans to expand internationally, which could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We anticipate that our efforts to expand internationally will entail the marketing and advertising of our platforms, solutions and brand. Revenue in countries outside of North America accounted for 2% of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 1% of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2017. We also do not have substantial experience in selling our platforms and solutions in international markets outside of North America or in conforming to the local cultures, standards, or policies necessary to successfully compete in those markets, and we may be required to invest significant resources in order to do so. We may not succeed in these efforts or achieve our consumer acquisition, service provider expansion or other goals. In some international markets, consumer preferences and buying behaviors may be different, and we may use business or pricing models that are different from our traditional model to provide our platforms and solutions to consumers in those markets or we may be unsuccessful in implementing the appropriate business model. Our revenue from new foreign markets may not exceed the costs of establishing, marketing, and maintaining our international offerings. In addition, the current instability in the eurozone could have many adverse consequences on our international expansion, including sovereign default, liquidity and capital pressures on eurozone financial institutions, reducing the availability of credit and increasing the risk of financial sector failures and the risk of one or more eurozone member states leaving the euro, resulting in the possibility of capital and exchange controls and uncertainty about the impact of contracts and currency exchange rates.
In addition, conducting expanded international operations subjects us to new risks that we have not generally faced in our current markets. These risks include:
• | localization of our solutions, including the addition of foreign languages and adaptation to new local practices and regulatory requirements; |
• | lack of experience in other geographic markets; |
• | strong local competitors; |
• | the cost and burden of complying with, lack of familiarity with, and unexpected changes in, foreign legal and regulatory requirements, including more stringent privacy regulations; |
• | difficulties in managing and staffing international operations; |
• | fluctuations in currency exchange rates or restrictions on foreign currency; |
• | potentially adverse tax consequences, including the complexities of transfer pricing, value added or other tax systems, double taxation and restrictions and/or taxes on the repatriation of earnings; |
• | dependence on third parties, including commercial partners with whom we do not have extensive experience; |
• | increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities; |
61
• | political, social, and economic instability, terrorist attacks, and security concerns in general; and |
• | reduced or varied protection for intellectual property rights in some countries. |
Operating in international markets also requires significant management attention and financial resources. The investment and additional resources required to establish operations and manage growth in other countries may not produce desired levels of revenue or profitability.
Our software contains encryption technologies, certain types of which are subject to U.S. and foreign export control regulations and, in some foreign countries, restrictions on importation and/or use. Any failure on our part to comply with encryption or other applicable export control requirements could result in financial penalties or other sanctions under the U.S. export regulations, including restrictions on future export activities, which could harm our business and operating results. Regulatory restrictions could impair our access to technologies needed to improve our platforms and solutions and may also limit or reduce the demand for our platforms and solutions outside of the United States.
The incurrence of debt may impact our financial position and subject us to additional financial and operating restrictions.
On October 6, 2017, we entered into a $125.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, or the 2017 Facility, with Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, as administrative agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as documentation agent, and a syndicate of lenders. Upon entry into the 2017 Facility, we borrowed $72.0 million, which was used to repay the previously outstanding balance under our previous credit facility. The outstanding balance of the 2017 Facility was $69.0 million as of June 30, 2018.
Our overall leverage and certain covenants and obligations contained in the related documentation could adversely affect our financial health and business and future operations by, among other things:
• | making it more difficult to satisfy our obligations, including under the terms of the 2017 Facility; |
• | limiting our ability to refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us or at all; |
• | limiting our flexibility to plan for and adjust to changing business and market conditions and increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
• | limiting our ability to use our available cash flow to fund future acquisitions, working capital, business activities, and other general corporate requirements; and |
• | limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, to fund growth or for general corporate purposes, even when necessary to maintain adequate liquidity. |
Furthermore, substantially all of our assets, including our intellectual property, secure the 2017 Facility. If an event of default under the credit agreement occurs and is continuing, SVB may request the acceleration of the related debt and foreclose on the underlying security interests.
In addition, our 2017 Facility restricts our ability to make dividend payments and requires us to maintain certain leverage ratios, which may restrict our ability to invest in future growth. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
Our financial results may be adversely affected by changes in accounting principles applicable to us.
Our accounting policies are critical to the manner in which we present our results of operations and financial condition. Many of these policies are highly complex and involve many assumptions, estimates and judgments. A change in accounting standards or practices, in particular with respect to revenue recognition, could harm our operating results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. GAAP rules are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, the SEC and other various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. For example, we are currently assessing the impact of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” or Topic 842, which requires lessees to recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet. We plan to adopt Topic 842 effective January 1, 2019. Refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about this and other new accounting pronouncements. Implementation of this new standard could have a significant effect on our financial results, and any difficulties in implementing these pronouncements could cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations, which could result in regulatory discipline and harm investors’ confidence in us.
62
Our accounting is becoming more complex, and relies upon estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies. If our accounting is erroneous or based on assumptions that change or prove to be incorrect, our operating results could fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, and also to comply with many complex requirements and standards. We devote substantial resources to compliance with accounting requirements and we base our estimates on our best judgment, historical experience, information derived from third parties, and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. However, various factors are causing our accounting to become complex. For example, as a result of our acquisition of the Connect business unit of Icontrol, we now recognize revenue relating to the delivery of software relating to the Connect platforms under different revenue recognition standards than those that apply to delivery of our services under the Alarm.com platforms. Ongoing evolution of our business, and any future acquisitions, may compound these complexities. Our operating results may be adversely affected if we make accounting errors or our judgments prove to be wrong, assumptions change or actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors or guidance we may have provided, resulting in a decline in our stock price and potential legal claims. Significant judgments, assumptions and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, business combinations, and income taxes.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
If we fail to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights adequately, our business could be harmed.
We believe that our proprietary technology is essential to establishing and maintaining our leadership position. We seek to protect our intellectual property through trade secrets, copyrights, confidentiality, non-compete and nondisclosure agreements, patents, trademarks, domain names and other measures, some of which afford only limited protection. We also rely on patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright laws to protect our intellectual property. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our technology or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate or our competitors may independently develop similar or superior technology, or design around our intellectual property. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as the laws of the United States. Intellectual property protections may also be unavailable, limited or difficult to enforce in some countries, which could make it easier for competitors to capture market share. Our failure or inability to adequately protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
To prevent substantial unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights, it may be necessary to prosecute actions for infringement and/or misappropriation of our proprietary rights against third parties. See the section of this Quarterly Report titled "Legal Proceedings" for additional information on such actions. Any such action could result in significant costs and diversion of our resources and management's attention, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in such action. Furthermore, many of our current and potential competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights than we do. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property.
An assertion by a third party that we are infringing its intellectual property could subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses that could harm our business and results of operations.
The industries in which we compete are characterized by the existence of a large number of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, and by frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We have been involved with patent litigation suits in the past and we may be involved with and subject to similar litigation in the future to defend our intellectual property position. For example, on June 2, 2015, Vivint filed a lawsuit against us in U.S. District Court, District of Utah, alleging that our technology directly and indirectly infringes six patents that Vivint purchased. Vivint is seeking permanent injunctions, enhanced damages and attorneys' fees. See the section of this Quarterly Report titled "Legal Proceedings" for additional information on this matter. Should Vivint prevail on its claims that one or more elements of our solution infringe one or more of its patents, we could be required to pay damages of Vivint’s lost profits and/or a reasonable royalty for sales of our solution, enjoined from making, using, and selling our solution if a license or other right to continue selling such elements is not made available to us or we are unable to design around such patents, and required to pay ongoing royalties and comply with unfavorable terms if such a license is made available to us. While we believe we have valid defenses to Vivint’s claims, any of these outcomes could result in a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we were to prevail, this litigation could continue to be costly and time-consuming, divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations and dissuade potential customers from purchasing our solution, which would also materially harm our business. During the course of litigation, we anticipate announcements of the results of hearings and motions, and other interim developments related to the litigation. If securities analysts or investors regard these announcements as negative, the market price of our common stock may decline.
63
We might not prevail in any intellectual property infringement litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in such litigation and our service provider partner contracts may require us to indemnify them against certain liabilities they may incur as a result of our infringement of any third party intellectual property. Defending such claims, regardless of their merit, could be time-consuming and distracting to management, result in costly litigation or settlement, cause development delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. In addition, we currently have a limited portfolio of issued patents compared to our larger competitors, and therefore may not be able to effectively utilize our intellectual property portfolio to assert defenses or counterclaims in response to patent infringement claims or litigation brought against us by third parties. Further, litigation may involve patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners who have no relevant products or revenues and against which our potential patents provide no deterrence, and many other potential litigants have the capability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights and to defend claims that may be brought against them. Given that our platforms and solutions integrate with many aspects of a property, the risk that our platforms and solutions may be subject to these allegations is exacerbated. As we seek to extend our platforms and solutions, we could be constrained by the intellectual property rights of others. If our platforms and solutions exceed the scope of in-bound licenses or violate any third party proprietary rights, we could be required to withdraw those solutions from the market, re-develop those solutions or seek to obtain licenses from third parties, which might not be available on reasonable terms or at all. Any efforts to re-develop our platforms and solutions, obtain licenses from third parties on favorable terms or license a substitute technology might not be successful and, in any case, might substantially increase our costs and harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. If we were compelled to withdraw any of our platforms and solutions from the market, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be harmed.
We have indemnity obligations to certain of our service provider partners for certain expenses and liabilities resulting from intellectual property infringement claims regarding our platforms and solutions, which could force us to incur substantial costs.
We have indemnity obligations to certain of our service provider partners for intellectual property infringement claims regarding our platforms and solutions. As a result, in the case of infringement claims against these service provider partners, we could be required to indemnify them for losses resulting from such claims or to refund amounts they have paid to us. We expect that some of our service provider partners may seek indemnification from us in connection with infringement claims brought against them. In addition, we may elect to indemnify service provider partners where we have no contractual obligation to indemnify them and we will evaluate each such request on a case-by-case basis. If a service provider partner elects to invest resources in enforcing a claim for indemnification against us, we could incur significant costs disputing it. If we do not succeed in disputing it, we could face substantial liability.
The use of open source software in our platforms and solutions may expose us to additional risks and harm our intellectual property.
Some of our platforms and solutions use or incorporate software that is subject to one or more open source licenses and we may incorporate open source software in the future. Open source software is typically freely accessible, usable and modifiable. Certain open source software licenses require a user who intends to distribute the open source software as a component of the user's software to disclose publicly part or all of the source code to the user's software. In addition, certain open source software licenses require the user of such software to make any derivative works of the open source code available to others on potentially unfavorable terms to us or at no cost.
The terms of many open source licenses to which we are subject have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, and accordingly there is a risk that those licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our platforms and solutions. In that event, we could be required to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our platforms and solutions, to re-develop our platforms and solutions, to discontinue sales of our platforms and solutions or to release our proprietary software code under the terms of an open source license, any of which could harm our business. Further, given the nature of open source software, it may be more likely that third parties might assert copyright and other intellectual property infringement claims against us based on our use of these open source software programs. Litigation could be costly for us to defend, have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations or require us to devote additional research and development resources to change our solutions.
Although we are not aware of any use of open source software in our platforms and solutions that would require us to disclose all or a portion of the source code underlying our core solutions, it is possible that such use may have inadvertently occurred in deploying our platforms and solutions. Additionally, if a third party software provider has incorporated certain types of open source software into software we license from such third party for our platforms and solutions without our knowledge, we could, under certain circumstances, be required to disclose the source code to our platforms and solutions. This could harm our intellectual property position as well as our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
64
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock has been and will likely continue to be volatile.
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially as a result of a variety of factors, some of which are related in complex ways. Since shares of our common stock were sold in our initial public offering in June 2015 at a price of $14.00 per share, our stock price has ranged from an intraday low of $10.26 to an intraday high of $49.49 through June 30, 2018. The market price of our common stock may decline regardless of our operating performance, resulting in the potential for substantial losses for our stockholders, and may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the factors listed below and other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section:
• | actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition and operating results; |
• | the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet these projections; |
• | failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of our company, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors; |
• | ratings changes by any securities analysts who follow our company; |
• | variance in our financial performance from expectations of securities analysts; |
• | announcements by us or our competitors of significant business developments, technical innovations, acquisitions or new solutions; |
• | changes in the prices of our platforms and solutions; |
• | changes in our projected operating and financial results; |
• | changes in laws or regulations applicable to our platforms and solutions or marketing techniques, or our industry in general; |
• | our involvement in any litigation, including any lawsuits threatened or filed against us; |
• | our sale of our common stock or other securities in the future; |
• | changes in senior management or key personnel; |
• | trading volume of our common stock; |
• | changes in the anticipated future size and growth rate of our market; and |
• | general economic, regulatory and market conditions in the United States and abroad. |
The stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, regulatory and market conditions, may negatively impact the market price of our common stock. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their securities have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future, which could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause our market price to decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to predict the effect that sales, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers, and significant stockholders, may have on the prevailing market price of our common stock. Additionally, the shares of common stock subject to outstanding options under our equity incentive plans and the shares reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans, as well as shares issuable upon vesting of restricted stock awards, will become eligible for sale in the public market in the future, subject to certain legal and contractual limitations. Moreover, some holders of shares of our common stock have rights, subject to certain conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or our stockholders. We have also registered shares of
65
common stock that we may issue under our employee equity incentive plans. Accordingly, these shares may be able to be sold freely in the public market upon issuance as permitted by any applicable vesting requirements.
Our actual operating results may differ significantly from any guidance provided.
Our guidance, including forward-looking statements, is prepared by management and is qualified by, and subject to, a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Many of these uncertainties and contingencies are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. We generally state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to represent that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges.
Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions of the guidance furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. In particular, guidance relating to the anticipated results of operations of an acquired business is inherently more speculative in nature than other guidance as management will, necessarily, be less familiar with the business, procedures and operations of the acquired business. Accordingly, any guidance with respect to our projected financial performance, in particular with respect to our projected post-Acquisition financial performance, is necessarily only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date the guidance is given. Actual results will vary from the guidance and the variations may be material. Investors should also recognize that the reliability of any forecasted financial data will diminish the farther in the future that the data is forecasted.
Actual operating results may be different from our guidance, and such differences may be adverse and material. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged to put the guidance in context and not to place undue reliance on it. In addition, the market price of our common stock may reflect various market assumptions as to the accuracy of our guidance. If our actual results of operations fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially.
We are obligated to develop and maintain a system of effective internal controls over financial reporting. These internal controls may be determined to be not effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our common stock.
We have been and are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on an annual basis. This assessment includes disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective and would be required to disclose any material weaknesses identified in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. While we have established certain procedures and control over our financial reporting processes, we cannot assure you that these efforts will prevent restatements of our financial statements in the future.
Our independent registered public accounting firm is also required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting beginning with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. This assessment includes disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. For future reporting periods, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed or operating. We may not be able to remediate any future material weaknesses, or to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion.
If we are unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, investors could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by regulatory authorities, including the SEC and Nasdaq. Failure to remediate any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, or to maintain other effective control systems required of public companies, could also restrict our future access to the capital markets.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If our financial performance fails to meet analyst estimates or one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our shares, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.
66
We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future and, as a result, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.
We do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the development of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and subject to the restrictions on paying dividends in our 2017 Facility and any future indebtedness. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments.
Concentration of ownership among our current directors, executive officers and their affiliates may limit an investor's ability to influence significant corporate decisions.
As of June 30, 2018, our directors and executive officers, together with their affiliates, beneficially own a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, will have substantial influence over the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or its assets. This concentration of ownership could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of the company, merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination, which in turn could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult, limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our common stock.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or changes in our management. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include provisions that:
• | authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock, without further stockholder action and with voting liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock; |
• | require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by written consent, and limit the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings; |
• | establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting, including proposed nominations of persons for director nominees; |
• | establish that our board of directors is divided into three classes, with directors in each class serving three-year staggered terms; |
• | require the approval of holders of two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws or amend or repeal the provisions of our certificate of incorporation regarding the election and removal of directors and the ability of stockholders to take action by written consent or call a special meeting; |
• | prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors; and |
• | provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by the vote of a majority of directors then in office, even though less than a quorum. |
These provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management. In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any “interested” stockholder for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an “interested” stockholder. Any of the foregoing provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, and they could deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you would receive a premium for your common stock in an acquisition.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders, (3) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the
67
Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws or (4) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our common stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing provision. The forum selection clause in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
None.
(b) Use of Proceeds
None.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table contains information relating to the repurchases of our common stock made by us in the quarter ended June 30, 2018:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) | Average Price Paid per Share | ||||
April 1 to April 30, 2018 | — | $ | — | |||
May 1 to May 31, 2018 | 107 | 9.91 | ||||
June 1 to June 30, 2018 | — | — | ||||
Total | 107 | $ | 9.91 |
(1) Represents shares of unvested common stock that were repurchased by us from certain former employees upon termination of employment in accordance with the terms of the applicable employee’s stock option agreement. We repurchased the shares from the former employee at the original exercise price.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
68
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Where so indicated by footnote, exhibits that were previously filed are incorporated by reference. For exhibits incorporated by reference, the location of the exhibit in the previous filing is indicated.
Exhibit Number | Description | |
3.1(1) | ||
3.2(2) | ||
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
(1) Previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37461), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37461), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
* Filed herewith.
** This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
† Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.
69
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. | |||||
Date: | August 7, 2018 | By: | /s/ Steve Valenzuela | ||
Steve Valenzuela | |||||
Chief Financial Officer | |||||
(On behalf of the registrant and in his capacity as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
70