BLACKBAUD INC - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 000-50600
BLACKBAUD, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 11-2617163 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2000 Daniel Island Drive
Charleston, South Carolina 29492
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(843) 216-6200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ý NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ý | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES ¨ NO ý
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of July 25, 2013 was 45,749,899.
BLACKBAUD, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No. | |||
PART I. | |||
Item 1. | |||
Item 2. | |||
Item 3. | |||
Item 4. | |||
PART II. | |||
Item 2. | |||
Item 6. | |||
Exhibit – 31.1 | |||
Exhibit – 31.2 | |||
Exhibit – 32.1 | |||
Exhibit – 32.2 | |||
Exhibit – 101 | |||
Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the section titled “Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” in Part I, Item 2, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements consist of, among other things, trend analyses, statements regarding future events, future financial performance, our anticipated growth, the effect of general economic and market conditions, our business strategy and our plan to build and grow our business, our operating results, our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies, the effect of foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations on our financial results, the impact of expensing stock-based compensation, the sufficiency of our capital resources, our ability to meet our ongoing debt and obligations as they become due, and potential litigation involving us, all of which are based on current expectations, estimates, and forecasts, and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “aims,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “likely,” “will,” “should,” “believes,” “estimates,” “seeks,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are also intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations expressed in the report include: general economic risks; lengthy sales and implementation cycles, particularly in larger organizations; uncertainty regarding increased business and renewals from existing customers; continued success in sales growth; management of integration of recently acquired companies and other risks associated with acquisitions; the ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks associated with successful implementation of multiple integrated software products; risks related to our dividend policy and stock repurchase program, including potential limitations on our ability to grow and the possibility that we might discontinue payment of dividends; risks relating to restrictions imposed by our credit facility; risks associated with management of growth; technological changes that make our products and services less competitive; and the other risk factors set forth from time to time in our SEC filings. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those summarized under Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, and our quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management's beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Except as required by law, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
PART I- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Blackbaud, Inc.
Consolidated balance sheets
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share amounts) | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||
Assets | |||||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7,300 | $ | 13,491 | |||
Donor restricted cash | 27,054 | 68,177 | |||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $7,542 and $8,546 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 85,749 | 75,692 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 32,205 | 40,589 | |||||
Deferred tax asset, current portion | 12,973 | 15,799 | |||||
Total current assets | 165,281 | 213,748 | |||||
Property and equipment, net | 49,802 | 49,063 | |||||
Goodwill | 264,454 | 265,055 | |||||
Intangible assets, net | 155,746 | 168,037 | |||||
Other assets | 17,894 | 9,844 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 653,177 | $ | 705,747 | |||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Trade accounts payable | $ | 5,725 | $ | 13,623 | |||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 47,046 | 45,996 | |||||
Donations payable | 27,054 | 68,177 | |||||
Debt, current portion | 11,250 | 10,000 | |||||
Deferred revenue, current portion | 180,932 | 173,899 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 272,007 | 311,695 | |||||
Debt, net of current portion | 184,250 | 205,500 | |||||
Deferred tax liability | 27,291 | 24,468 | |||||
Deferred revenue, net of current portion | 10,608 | 11,119 | |||||
Other liabilities | 5,632 | 5,281 | |||||
Total liabilities | 499,788 | 558,063 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 9) | |||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | |||||||
Preferred stock; 20,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | — | — | |||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 180,000,000 shares authorized, 55,062,141 and 54,859,604 shares issued at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 55 | 55 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 213,707 | 203,638 | |||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 9,318,148 and 9,209,371 shares at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | (174,206 | ) | (170,898 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,406 | ) | (1,973 | ) | |||
Retained earnings | 115,239 | 116,862 | |||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 153,389 | 147,684 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 653,177 | $ | 705,747 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Blackbaud, Inc.
Consolidated statements of comprehensive income
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||||||
License fees | $ | 5,990 | $ | 4,521 | $ | 8,970 | $ | 11,689 | |||||||
Subscriptions | 51,964 | 37,923 | 99,720 | 65,985 | |||||||||||
Services | 31,368 | 31,790 | 60,206 | 55,748 | |||||||||||
Maintenance | 34,122 | 33,880 | 68,270 | 67,446 | |||||||||||
Other revenue | 2,024 | 2,076 | 3,925 | 4,028 | |||||||||||
Total revenue | 125,468 | 110,190 | 241,091 | 204,896 | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue | |||||||||||||||
Cost of license fees | 643 | 821 | 1,368 | 1,434 | |||||||||||
Cost of subscriptions | 21,605 | 16,561 | 41,988 | 29,535 | |||||||||||
Cost of services | 26,503 | 25,299 | 51,902 | 45,341 | |||||||||||
Cost of maintenance | 6,561 | 6,178 | 12,435 | 12,155 | |||||||||||
Cost of other revenue | 1,301 | 1,646 | 2,498 | 3,115 | |||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 56,613 | 50,505 | 110,191 | 91,580 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 68,855 | 59,685 | 130,900 | 113,316 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | |||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 24,423 | 24,223 | 48,815 | 44,600 | |||||||||||
Research and development | 16,483 | 14,856 | 32,912 | 28,160 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 12,849 | 21,753 | 25,591 | 36,254 | |||||||||||
Restructuring | 146 | — | 3,356 | — | |||||||||||
Amortization | 636 | 530 | 1,314 | 727 | |||||||||||
Impairment of cost method investment | — | 200 | — | 200 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 54,537 | 61,562 | 111,988 | 109,941 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 14,318 | (1,877 | ) | 18,912 | 3,375 | ||||||||||
Interest income | 20 | 33 | 37 | 80 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (1,497 | ) | (1,462 | ) | (3,191 | ) | (1,653 | ) | |||||||
Other expense, net | (309 | ) | (140 | ) | (206 | ) | (448 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | 12,532 | (3,446 | ) | 15,552 | 1,354 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | 5,909 | (1,175 | ) | 6,263 | 866 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 6,623 | $ | (2,271 | ) | $ | 9,289 | $ | 488 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per share | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||
Common shares and equivalents outstanding | |||||||||||||||
Basic weighted average shares | 44,538,444 | 44,112,905 | 44,506,157 | 44,023,650 | |||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares | 45,349,666 | 44,112,905 | 45,190,158 | 44,659,678 | |||||||||||
Dividends per share | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.24 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (266 | ) | (168 | ) | 19 | 111 | |||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of tax | 429 | (564 | ) | 548 | (564 | ) | |||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | 163 | (732 | ) | 567 | (453 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 6,786 | $ | (3,003 | ) | $ | 9,856 | $ | 35 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Blackbaud, Inc.
Consolidated statements of cash flows
(Unaudited)
Six months ended June 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||||
Net income | $ | 9,289 | $ | 488 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 21,135 | 12,223 | |||||
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns | 1,246 | 2,511 | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 9,895 | 9,624 | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | — | (340 | ) | ||||
Deferred taxes | 4,933 | 464 | |||||
Impairment of cost method investment | — | 200 | |||||
Other non-cash adjustments | 838 | 177 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition of businesses: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | (11,966 | ) | (16,135 | ) | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 8,319 | (7,268 | ) | ||||
Trade accounts payable | (4,586 | ) | 643 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (9,731 | ) | (4,692 | ) | |||
Donor restricted cash | 41,505 | 21,868 | |||||
Donations payable | (41,505 | ) | (21,868 | ) | |||
Deferred revenue | 8,100 | 13,054 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 37,472 | 10,949 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (10,068 | ) | (11,568 | ) | |||
Purchase of net assets of acquired companies, net of cash acquired | (876 | ) | (280,095 | ) | |||
Capitalized software development costs | (1,643 | ) | (235 | ) | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (12,587 | ) | (291,898 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt | 27,900 | 312,000 | |||||
Payments on debt | (47,900 | ) | (52,400 | ) | |||
Payments of deferred financing costs | — | (2,440 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 221 | 2,984 | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | — | 340 | |||||
Dividend payments to stockholders | (10,959 | ) | (10,830 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (30,738 | ) | 249,654 | ||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents | (338 | ) | (33 | ) | |||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (6,191 | ) | (31,328 | ) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 13,491 | 52,520 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 7,300 | $ | 21,192 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Blackbaud, Inc.
Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share amounts) | Common stock | Additional paid-in capital | Treasury stock | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | Retained earnings | Total stockholders' equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | 53,959,532 | $ | 54 | $ | 175,401 | $ | (166,226 | ) | $ | (1,148 | ) | $ | 131,921 | $ | 140,002 | |||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | 6,583 | 6,583 | |||||||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends | — | — | — | — | — | (21,731 | ) | (21,731 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units | 355,180 | — | 3,146 | — | — | — | 3,146 | |||||||||||||||||||
Surrender of 189,547 shares upon restricted stock and restricted stock unit vesting and exercise of stock appreciation rights | — | — | — | (4,672 | ) | — | — | (4,672 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Tax impact of exercise of equity-based compensation | — | — | 81 | — | — | — | 81 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | 19,151 | — | — | 89 | 19,240 | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based awards assumed in business combination | — | — | 5,859 | — | — | — | 5,859 | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants | 687,652 | 1 | — | — | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock cancellations | (142,760 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | — | — | — | — | (825 | ) | — | (825 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 | 54,859,604 | $ | 55 | $ | 203,638 | $ | (170,898 | ) | $ | (1,973 | ) | $ | 116,862 | $ | 147,684 | |||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | 9,289 | 9,289 | |||||||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends | — | — | — | — | — | (10,959 | ) | (10,959 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units | 274,658 | — | 221 | — | — | — | 221 | |||||||||||||||||||
Surrender of 108,777 shares upon restricted stock and restricted stock unit vesting and exercise of stock appreciation rights | — | — | — | (3,308 | ) | — | — | (3,308 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | 9,848 | — | — | 47 | 9,895 | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants | 21,023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock cancellations | (93,144 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | 567 | — | 567 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2013 | 55,062,141 | $ | 55 | $ | 213,707 | $ | (174,206 | ) | $ | (1,406 | ) | $ | 115,239 | $ | 153,389 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
1. Organization
We provide on-premise and cloud-based software solutions and related services designed specifically for nonprofit organizations. Our products and services enable nonprofit organizations to increase donations, reduce fundraising costs, improve communications with constituents, manage their finances and optimize internal operations. As of June 30, 2013, we had over 28,000 active customers distributed across multiple verticals within the nonprofit market including education, foundations, health and human services, religion, arts and cultural, public and societal benefits, environment and animal welfare, as well as international foreign affairs.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
Unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim financial reporting. These consolidated statements are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary to state fairly the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity, for the periods presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP). The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. Operating results and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, or any other future period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations for interim reporting of the SEC. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, and other forms filed with the SEC from time to time.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Blackbaud, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we reconsider and evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those that impact revenue recognition, long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill, stock-based compensation, the provision for income taxes, capitalization of software development costs, our allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, deferred sales commissions, accounting for business combinations and loss contingencies. Changes in the facts or circumstances underlying these estimates could result in material changes and actual results could materially differ from these estimates.
Revenue recognition
Our revenue is primarily generated from the following sources: (i) charging for the use of our software products in a hosted environment; (ii) selling perpetual licenses of our software products; (iii) providing professional services including implementation, training, consulting, analytic, hosting and other services; and (iv) providing software maintenance and support services.
We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are met:
•Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
•The product or services has been delivered;
5
•The fee is fixed or determinable; and
•Collection of the resulting receivable is probable.
Determining whether and when these criteria have been met can require significant judgment and estimates. We deem acceptance of an agreement to be evidence of an arrangement. Delivery for our products occurs when the product is shipped or transmitted, and title and risk of loss have transferred to the customers. Our typical agreements do not include customer acceptance provisions; however, if acceptance provisions are provided, delivery is deemed to occur upon acceptance. We consider the fee to be fixed or determinable unless the fee is subject to refund or adjustment or is not payable within our standard payment terms. Payment terms greater than 90 days are considered to be beyond our customary payment terms. Collection is deemed probable if we expect that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as they become due. If we determine that collection is not probable, we defer revenue recognition until collection. Revenue is recognized net of sales returns and allowances.
Subscriptions
We provide hosting services to customers who have purchased perpetual rights to certain of our software products (hosting services). Revenue from hosting services, as well as data enrichment services, data management services and online training programs, is recognized ratably beginning on the activation date over the term of the agreement, which generally ranges from one to three years. Any related set-up fees are recognized ratably over the estimated period that the customer benefits from the related hosting service.
We make certain of our software products available for use in hosted application arrangements without licensing perpetual rights to the software (hosted applications). Revenue from hosted applications is recognized ratably beginning on the activation date over the term of the agreement, which generally ranges from one to three years. Any revenue related to upfront activation, set-up or implementation fees is recognized ratably over the estimated period that the customer benefits from the related hosted application. Direct and incremental costs relating to activation, set-up and implementation for hosted applications are capitalized until the hosted application is deployed and in use, and then expensed over the estimated period that the customer benefits from the related hosted application.
For arrangements that have multiple elements and do not include software licenses, we allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of the arrangement to those elements that qualify as separate units of accounting. The arrangement consideration is allocated to the separate units of accounting based on relative selling price method in accordance with the selling price hierarchy, which includes: (i) vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) if available; (ii) third-party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not available; and (iii) best estimate of selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In general, we use VSOE to allocate the selling price to subscription and service deliverables.
Revenue from transaction processing fees is recognized when the service is provided and the amounts are determinable. Credit card fees directly associated with processing donations for customers are included in subscriptions revenue, net of related transaction costs.
License fees
We sell software licenses with maintenance, varying levels of professional services and, in certain instances, with hosting services. We allocate revenue to each of the elements in these arrangements using the residual method under which we first allocate revenue to the undelivered elements, typically the non-software license components, based on objective evidence of the fair value of the various elements. We determine the fair value of the various elements using different methods. Fair value for maintenance services associated with software licenses is based upon renewal rates stated in the agreements with customers, which vary according to the level of support service provided under the maintenance program. Fair value of professional services and other products and services is based on sales of these products and services to other customers when sold on a stand-alone basis. Any remaining revenue is allocated to the delivered elements which is normally the software license in the arrangement.
When a software license is sold with software customization services, generally the services are to provide customer support for assistance in creating special reports and other enhancements that will assist with efforts to improve operational efficiency and/or to support business process improvements. These services are not essential to the functionality of the software. However,
6
when software customization services are considered essential to the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue for both the software license and the services using the percentage-of-completion method.
Services
We generally bill consulting, installation and implementation services based on hourly rates plus reimbursable travel-related expenses. Revenue is recognized for these services over the period the services are performed.
We recognize analytic services revenue from donor prospect research engagements, the sale of lists of potential donors, benchmarking studies and data modeling service engagements upon delivery. In arrangements where we provide customers the right to updates to the lists during the contract period, revenue is recognized ratably over the contract period.
We sell training at a fixed rate for each specific class at a per attendee price or at a packaged price for several attendees, and recognize the related revenue upon the customer attending and completing training. Additionally, we sell fixed-rate programs, which permit customers to attend unlimited training over a specified contract period, typically one year, subject to certain restrictions, and revenue is recognized ratably over the contract period.
Maintenance
We recognize revenue from maintenance services ratably over the contract term, typically one year. Maintenance contracts are at rates that vary according to the level of the maintenance program and are generally renewable annually. Maintenance contracts also include the right to unspecified product upgrades on an if-and-when available basis. Certain support services are sold in prepaid units of time and recognized as revenue upon their usage.
Deferred revenue
To the extent that our customers are billed for the above described services in advance of delivery, we record such amounts in deferred revenue.
Goodwill
The change in goodwill for each reportable segment during the six months ended June 30, 2013, consisted of the following:
(in thousands) | ECBU | GMBU | IBU | Target Analytics | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | 148,322 | $ | 75,149 | $ | 6,311 | $ | 33,177 | $ | 2,096 | $ | 265,055 | |||||||||||
Additions related to business combinations | — | — | 413 | — | — | 413 | |||||||||||||||||
Adjustments related to prior year business combinations | (494 | ) | (193 | ) | — | — | — | (687 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Effect of foreign currency translation | — | — | (327 | ) | — | — | (327 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2013 | $ | 147,828 | $ | 74,956 | $ | 6,397 | $ | 33,177 | $ | 2,096 | $ | 264,454 | |||||||||||
7
Amortization expense
Amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets acquired in business combinations is allocated to cost of revenue and operating expenses on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income based on the revenue stream to which the asset contributes and the nature of the intangible asset. The following table summarizes amortization expense for:
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||
Included in cost of revenue: | |||||||||||||||
Cost of license fees | $ | 126 | $ | 124 | $ | 247 | $ | 247 | |||||||
Cost of subscriptions | 4,678 | 2,706 | 9,312 | 3,688 | |||||||||||
Cost of services | 633 | 468 | 1,266 | 879 | |||||||||||
Cost of maintenance | 114 | 250 | 228 | 494 | |||||||||||
Cost of other revenue | 19 | 19 | 37 | 38 | |||||||||||
Total included in cost of revenue | 5,570 | 3,567 | 11,090 | 5,346 | |||||||||||
Included in operating expenses | 636 | 530 | 1,314 | 727 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 6,206 | $ | 4,097 | $ | 12,404 | $ | 6,073 | |||||||
The following table outlines the estimated future amortization expense for each of the next five years for our finite-lived intangible assets as of June 30, 2013:
Year ending December 31, | Amortization | ||
(in thousands) | expense | ||
2013 - remaining | $ | 12,195 | |
2014 | 22,588 | ||
2015 | 22,214 | ||
2016 | 21,807 | ||
2017 | 19,492 | ||
Total | $ | 98,296 | |
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which requires that entities provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, entities are required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, entities are required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We have presented the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted ASU 2012-02, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which simplifies how entities test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. ASU 2012-02 permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test currently required by ASC Topic 350-30 on general intangibles other than goodwill. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
8
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740) Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. Under ASU 2013-11, an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. ASU 2013-11 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. We do not anticipate any material impact from the adoption of ASU 2013-11.
3. Business combinations
Convio
In May 2012, we completed our acquisition of Convio, Inc. (Convio), for approximately $329.8 million in cash consideration and the assumption of unvested equity awards valued at approximately $5.9 million, for a total of $335.7 million. Convio was a leading provider of on-demand constituent engagement solutions that enabled nonprofit organizations to more effectively raise funds, advocate for change and cultivate relationships. The acquisition of Convio expands our subscription and online offerings and accelerates our evolution to a subscription-based revenue model. As a result of the acquisition, Convio has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. The results of operations of Convio are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Because we have integrated a substantial amount of the Convio operations and have made product rationalization decisions, it is not possible to determine the revenue and operating costs attributable solely to the acquired business. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we incurred $6.4 million of acquisition-related costs associated with the acquisition of Convio, which were recorded in general and administrative expense.
We financed the acquisition of Convio through cash on hand and borrowings of $312.0 million under our amended credit facility. In connection with closing the Convio acquisition, we designated Convio as a material domestic subsidiary under our credit facility. As a material domestic subsidiary, Convio guarantees amounts outstanding under the credit facility and pledges certain stock of its subsidiaries.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed:
(in thousands) | |||
Net working capital, excluding deferred revenue | $ | 57,062 | |
Property and equipment | 6,591 | ||
Other long term assets | 75 | ||
Deferred revenue | (7,847 | ) | |
Deferred tax liability | (33,181 | ) | |
Intangible assets and liabilities | 139,650 | ||
Goodwill | 173,324 | ||
$ | 335,674 | ||
The estimated fair value of accounts receivable acquired approximates the contractual value of $12.8 million. The goodwill recognized is attributable primarily to the assembled workforce of Convio and the opportunities for expected synergies. None of the goodwill arising in the acquisition is deductible for income tax purposes. The estimated amount of goodwill assigned to the Enterprise Customer Business Unit and the General Markets Business Unit reporting segments was $124.8 million, and $48.5 million, respectively.
9
The acquisition resulted in the identification of the following identifiable intangible assets:
Intangible assets acquired | Weighted average amortization period | ||||
(in thousands) | (in years) | ||||
Customer relationships | $ | 53,000 | 15 | ||
Marketing assets | 7,800 | 7 | |||
Acquired technology | 69,000 | 8 | |||
In-process research and development | 9,100 | 7 | |||
Non-compete agreements | 1,440 | 2 | |||
Unfavorable leasehold interests | (690 | ) | 7 | ||
$ | 139,650 | ||||
The fair value of the intangible assets was based on the income approach, cost approach, relief of royalty rate method and excess earnings methods. Customer relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis. Marketing assets, acquired technology and non-compete agreements are amortized on a straight-line basis. In-process research and development was placed into service subsequent to the time of acquisition and is amortized on a straight-line basis from the time of being placed into service over a weighted average amortization period of seven years.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations assume that the acquisition of Convio occurred on January 1, 2011. This unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect any adjustments for anticipated synergies resulting from the acquisition and should not be relied upon as being indicative of the historical results that would have been attained had the transaction been consummated as of January 1, 2011, or of the results that may occur in the future.
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 125,468 | $ | 118,789 | $ | 241,091 | $ | 234,364 | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 6,623 | $ | (1,914 | ) | $ | 9,289 | $ | (5,979 | ) | |||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | (0.14 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | (0.14 | ) | |||||
4. Earnings (loss) per share
We compute basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares then outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflect the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, settlement of stock appreciation rights and vesting of restricted stock awards and units.
10
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||
Numerator: | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss), as reported | $ | 6,623 | $ | (2,271 | ) | $ | 9,289 | $ | 488 | ||||||
Denominator: | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares | 44,538,444 | 44,112,905 | 44,506,157 | 44,023,650 | |||||||||||
Add effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||||||||||
Employee equity-based compensation | 811,222 | — | 684,001 | 636,028 | |||||||||||
Weighted average common shares assuming dilution | 45,349,666 | 44,112,905 | 45,190,158 | 44,659,678 | |||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||
The following shares and potential shares underlying stock-based awards were not included in diluted earnings (loss) per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||
Shares excluded from calculations of diluted earnings (loss) per share | 54,222 | 753,365 | 105,339 | 75,399 | |||||||
5. Prepaid expenses and other assets
Prepaid expenses and other assets consisted of the following as of:
(in thousands) | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||
Deferred sales commissions | $ | 19,023 | $ | 18,142 | |||
Prepaid software maintenance | 8,595 | 5,530 | |||||
Taxes, prepaid and receivable | 992 | 7,398 | |||||
Deferred professional services costs | 8,055 | 8,057 | |||||
Other assets | 13,434 | 11,306 | |||||
Total prepaid expenses and other assets | 50,099 | 50,433 | |||||
Less: Long-term portion | 17,894 | 9,844 | |||||
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 32,205 | $ | 40,589 | |||
11
6. Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following as of:
(in thousands) | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||
Taxes payable | $ | 6,147 | $ | 7,607 | |||
Accrued commissions and salaries | 5,883 | 5,905 | |||||
Accrued bonuses | 8,363 | 11,966 | |||||
Customer credit balances | 2,576 | 4,577 | |||||
Accrued software and maintenance | 9,501 | 3,875 | |||||
Unrecognized tax benefit | 4,124 | 3,846 | |||||
Other liabilities | 16,084 | 13,501 | |||||
Total accrued expenses and other liabilities | 52,678 | 51,277 | |||||
Less: Long-term portion | 5,632 | 5,281 | |||||
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 47,046 | $ | 45,996 | |||
7. Debt
Credit facility
We have a five-year $325.0 million credit facility which includes the following facilities: (i) a dollar and a designated currency revolving credit facility with sublimits for letters of credit and swingline loans, and (ii) a delayed draw term loan. The credit facility is secured by the stock and limited liability company interests of certain of our subsidiaries and is guaranteed by our material domestic subsidiaries.
Amounts borrowed under the dollar tranche revolving credit loans and delayed draw term loans under the credit facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, (a) Base Rate equal to the highest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) one month LIBOR plus 1%, in addition to a margin of 0.25% to 1.25%, or (b) LIBOR rate plus a margin of 1.25% to 2.25%. Swingline loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Base Rate plus a margin of 0.25% to 1.25% or such other rate agreed to between the Swingline lender and us. Designated currency tranche revolving credit loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 1.25% to 2.25%. The exact amount of any margin depends on the nature of the loan and our leverage ratio.
We also pay a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility from 0.20% to 0.35% per annum, depending on our leverage ratio. At June 30, 2013, the commitment fee was 0.28%.
The term loans under our credit facility require periodic principal payments. The balance of the term loans and any amounts drawn on the revolving credit loans are due upon maturity of the credit facility in February 2017. We evaluate the classification of our debt based on the required annual maturities of our credit facility.
The credit facility includes financial covenants related to the leverage ratio and interest ratio, as well as restrictions on the maximum amount of annual capital expenditures, our ability to declare and pay dividends and our ability to repurchase shares of our common stock. At June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with our debt covenants under the credit facility.
12
The following table summarizes our debt balances and the related effective interest rate which includes our interest cost incurred and the effect of interest rate swap agreements.
Debt balance at | Effective interest rate at | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||||
Credit facility: | |||||||||||||
Revolving credit loans | $ | 108,000 | $ | 123,000 | 2.21 | % | 2.68 | % | |||||
Term loans | 87,500 | 92,500 | 2.64 | % | 3.14 | % | |||||||
Total debt | 195,500 | 215,500 | 2.40 | % | 2.88 | % | |||||||
Less: Debt, current portion | 11,250 | 10,000 | 2.64 | % | 3.14 | % | |||||||
Debt, net of current portion | $ | 184,250 | $ | 205,500 | 2.38 | % | 2.86 | % | |||||
We believe the carrying amount of our credit facility approximates its fair value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, due to the variable rate nature of the debt. As LIBOR rates are observable at commonly quoted intervals, it is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
As of June 30, 2013, the required annual maturities related to our credit facility were as follows:
Year ending December 31, (in thousands) | Annual maturities | ||
2013 - remaining | $ | 5,000 | |
2014 | 13,750 | ||
2015 | 15,000 | ||
2016 | 15,000 | ||
2017 | 146,750 | ||
Total required maturities | $ | 195,500 | |
Deferred financing costs
In February 2012, we amended and restated our credit facility to increase our borrowing capacity. In connection with our amended and restated credit facility we paid $2.4 million of financing costs. These costs together with a portion of the unamortized financing costs from our previous credit facility are being amortized over the term of the new facility. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, deferred financing costs totaling $2.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively, are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
8. Derivative instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk. We have two interest rate swap agreements which effectively convert portions of our variable rate debt under our credit facility to a fixed rate for the terms of the swap agreements. The aggregate notional value of the swap agreements was $150.0 million with effective dates beginning in May 2012 through January 2017. We designated the swap agreements as cash flow hedges at the inception of the contracts.
The fair values of our derivative instruments were as follows as of:
Liability fair value at | |||||||||
(in thousands) | Balance sheet location | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments: | |||||||||
Interest rate swaps | Other liabilities | $ | 399 | $ | 1,296 | ||||
Total derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments | $ | 399 | $ | 1,296 | |||||
The fair value of our interest rate swaps was based on model-driven valuations using LIBOR rates, which are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Accordingly, our interest rate swaps are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
13
The effects of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships were as follows:
Loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of | Location of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income | Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income | |||||||||||
June 30, 2013 | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2013 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | $ | 399 | Interest expense | $ | 200 | $ | 389 | ||||||
June 30, 2012 | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2012 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | $ | 925 | Interest expense | $ | 64 | $ | 64 | ||||||
We recognize income tax expense or benefit within accumulated other comprehensive loss each reporting period based on the change in fair value of our derivative instruments. The income tax expense recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss was $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. The income tax benefit recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss was $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. There was no ineffective portion of our interest rate swaps during the three and six months ended months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012.
9. Commitments and contingencies
Leases
We lease our headquarters facility under a 15-year lease agreement which was entered into in October 2008, and has two five-year renewal options. The current annual base rent of the lease is $3.9 million payable in equal monthly installments. The base rent escalates annually at a rate equal to the change in the consumer price index, as defined in the agreement, but not to exceed 5.5% in any year.
With our acquisition of Convio, we assumed a lease for office space in Austin, Texas which terminates on September 30, 2023, and has two five-year renewal options. Under the terms of the lease, we will increase our leased space by approximately 20,000 square feet on July 31, 2016. The current annual base rent of the lease is $2.2 million. The terms of the agreement include a rent holiday during the first year and base rent that escalates annually thereafter between 2% and 4%. The related rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the length of the lease term. We have a standby letter of credit of $2.0 million for a security deposit for this lease.
We have provisions in our leases for our headquarters facility and office space in Austin, Texas that entitle us to leasehold improvement allowances of $4.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively. These amounts will be recorded as a reduction to rent expense ratably over the terms of the leases. Rent expense was reduced related to these lease provisions by $0.2 million and $0.3 million, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and by $0.1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The leasehold improvement allowances have been included in the table of operating lease commitments below as a reduction in our lease commitments ratably over the then remaining terms of the leases. The timing of the reimbursements for the actual leasehold improvements may vary from the amounts reflected in the table below.
Additionally, we have subleased a portion of our facilities under various agreements extending through 2013. The reduction in rent expense related to these agreements during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was not material to the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Rent expense was reduced by $0.1 million and $0.2 million related to these agreements during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
We have also received, and expect to receive through 2016, quarterly South Carolina state incentive payments as a result of locating our headquarters facility in Berkeley County, South Carolina. These amounts are recorded as a reduction of rent expense and were $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively and $1.0 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Total rent expense was $2.4 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively and $4.5 million and $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
14
Additionally, we lease various office space and equipment under operating leases. We also have various non-cancelable capital leases for computer equipment and furniture that are not significant.
As of June 30, 2013, the future minimum lease commitments related to lease agreements, net of related sublease commitments and lease incentives, were as follows:
Year ending December 31, | Operating | ||
(in thousands) | leases | ||
2013 – remaining | $ | 4,528 | |
2014 | 10,133 | ||
2015 | 9,940 | ||
2016 | 9,602 | ||
2017 | 9,659 | ||
Thereafter | 50,604 | ||
Total minimum lease payments | $ | 94,466 | |
Other commitments
We utilize third-party relationships in conjunction with our products and services, with contractual arrangements varying in length from one to three years. In certain cases, these arrangements require a minimum annual purchase commitment. As of June 30, 2013, the remaining aggregate minimum purchase commitment under these arrangements is approximately $15.4 million through 2016. We incurred expense under these arrangements of $0.7 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.
Legal contingencies
We are subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. We record an accrual for a contingency when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe the amount of potential liability with respect to these actions will have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
10. Income taxes
Our effective tax rate, including the effects of period-specific events, was:
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||
Effective tax rate | 47.2 | % | 34.1 | % | 40.3 | % | 64.0 | % | |||
The increase in the effective tax rate during the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is primarily due to an increase in the proportional earnings during the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 relative to the estimated full year earnings for the respective periods. The estimated annual effective tax rate at June 30, 2013 and 2012 was relatively unchanged.
The decrease in the effective tax rate during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is primarily due to an increase in the benefit from research and development credits and a decrease in nondeductible acquisition costs, partially offset by an increase in pretax income. The research and development credits were reinstated in January 2013 with retrospective application to the 2012 tax year. The provision for income taxes differs from the tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due primarily to research and development tax credits, which were partially offset by foreign loss jurisdictions where we have determined a valuation allowance is appropriate, as well as state taxes. Our effective income tax rate may fluctuate quarterly as a result of factors, including changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies, valuation allowances, and changes in tax law.
15
We have deferred tax assets for federal, state, and international net operating loss carryforwards and state tax credits. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to various Internal Revenue Code limitations and applicable state tax laws. The foreign net operating loss carryforwards, a portion of the state net operating loss carryforwards and a portion of state tax credits have a valuation reserve due to the uncertainty of realizing such carryforwards and credits in the future.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate, was $4.1 million at June 30, 2013 and $3.8 million at December 31, 2012. We recognize accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.
11. Stock-based compensation
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense:
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||
Included in cost of revenue: | |||||||||||||||
Cost of subscriptions | $ | 189 | $ | 245 | $ | 415 | $ | 426 | |||||||
Cost of services | 593 | 565 | 1,436 | 1,057 | |||||||||||
Cost of maintenance | 194 | 89 | 256 | 200 | |||||||||||
Total included in cost of revenue | 976 | 899 | 2,107 | 1,683 | |||||||||||
Included in operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 545 | 603 | 1,243 | 1,020 | |||||||||||
Research and development | 1,062 | 847 | 2,215 | 1,498 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 2,134 | 3,439 | 4,330 | 5,423 | |||||||||||
Total included in operating expenses | 3,741 | 4,889 | 7,788 | 7,941 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 4,717 | $ | 5,788 | $ | 9,895 | $ | 9,624 | |||||||
12. Stockholders’ equity
Dividends
In February 2013, our Board of Directors approved an annual dividend of $0.48 per share. The following table provides information with respect to quarterly dividends paid on common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Declaration Date | Dividend per Share | Record Date | Payable Date | |||||
February 2013 | $ | 0.12 | February 28 | March 15 | ||||
May 2013 | $ | 0.12 | May 28 | June 14 | ||||
In August 2013, our Board of Directors declared a third quarter dividend of $0.12 per share payable on September 13, 2013, to stockholders of record on August 28, 2013.
16
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component, consisted of the following:
(in thousands) | Gains and losses on cash flow hedges | Foreign currency translation adjustment | Total | ||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | (791 | ) | $ | (1,182 | ) | $ | (1,973 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | 159 | 19 | 178 | ||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense | 389 | — | 389 | ||||||||
Net current-period other comprehensive income | 548 | 19 | 567 | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2013 | $ | (243 | ) | $ | (1,163 | ) | $ | (1,406 | ) | ||
13. Segment information
As of June 30, 2013, our reportable segments were the Enterprise Customer Business Unit, or the ECBU, the General Markets Business Unit, or the GMBU, the International Business Unit, or the IBU, and Target Analytics. Following is a description of each reportable segment:
• | The ECBU is focused on marketing, sales, delivery and support to large and/or strategic customers, specifically identified prospects and customers in North America; |
• | The GMBU is focused on marketing, sales, delivery and support to all emerging and mid-sized prospects and customers in North America; |
• | The IBU is focused on marketing, sales, delivery and support to all prospects and customers outside of North America; and |
• | Target Analytics is primarily focused on marketing, sales and delivery of analytic services to all prospects and customers in North America. |
Our chief operating decision maker is our chief executive officer, or CEO. The CEO reviews financial information presented on an operating segment basis for the purposes of making certain operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The CEO uses internal financial reports that provide segment revenues and operating income, excluding stock-based compensation expense, amortization expense, depreciation expense, research and development expense and certain corporate sales, marketing, general and administrative expenses. Currently, the CEO believes that the exclusion of these costs allows for a better understanding of the operating performance of the operating units and management of other operating expenses and cash needs. The CEO does not review any segment balance sheet information.
17
We have recast our segment disclosures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, to present them on a consistent basis with the current year due to a change in our methodology for allocating expenses to our reportable segments. Summarized reportable segment financial results, were as follows:
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||
Revenue by segment: | |||||||||||||||
ECBU | $ | 49,275 | $ | 41,649 | $ | 93,954 | $ | 75,491 | |||||||
GMBU | 55,924 | 49,703 | 108,942 | 93,534 | |||||||||||
IBU | 10,788 | 10,330 | 20,026 | 19,000 | |||||||||||
Target Analytics | 9,458 | 8,497 | 18,126 | 16,860 | |||||||||||
Other(1) | 23 | 11 | 43 | 11 | |||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 125,468 | $ | 110,190 | $ | 241,091 | $ | 204,896 | |||||||
Segment operating income(2): | |||||||||||||||
ECBU | $ | 26,496 | $ | 16,608 | $ | 50,138 | $ | 31,795 | |||||||
GMBU | 33,371 | 29,807 | 65,546 | 55,866 | |||||||||||
IBU | 2,614 | 1,781 | 3,238 | 2,143 | |||||||||||
Target Analytics | 3,735 | 3,509 | 6,911 | 6,953 | |||||||||||
Other(1) | 80 | 32 | 291 | 284 | |||||||||||
66,296 | 51,737 | 126,124 | 97,041 | ||||||||||||
Less: | |||||||||||||||
Corporate unallocated costs(3) | 41,055 | 43,729 | 84,913 | 77,969 | |||||||||||
Stock-based compensation costs | 4,717 | 5,788 | 9,895 | 9,624 | |||||||||||
Amortization expense | 6,206 | 4,097 | 12,404 | 6,073 | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net | 1,477 | 1,429 | 3,154 | 1,573 | |||||||||||
Other expense, net | 309 | 140 | 206 | 448 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | $ | 12,532 | $ | (3,446 | ) | $ | 15,552 | $ | 1,354 | ||||||
(1) | Other includes revenue and the related costs from the sale of products and services not directly attributable to an operating segment. |
(2) | Segment operating income includes direct, controllable costs related to the sale of products and services by the reportable segment, except for IBU, which includes operating costs from our foreign locations such as sales, marketing, general, administrative, depreciation and facilities costs. |
(3) | Corporate unallocated costs include research and development, depreciation expense, and certain corporate sales, marketing, general and administrative expenses. |
14. Restructuring
During 2012, in an effort to consolidate our operating locations, we decided not to renew our current lease for office space in San Diego, CA, which matured on June 30, 2013. As a result, we initiated a plan to transition most of our operations based in San Diego, CA to our Austin, TX location, which we substantially completed in June 2013 when the lease matured.
18
The following table summarizes our restructuring costs related to our San Diego office transition as of June 30, 2013:
Total costs expected to be incurred | Costs incurred during the three months ended | Costs incurred during the six months ended | Cumulative costs incurred as of | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||
By component: | |||||||||||||||
Employee severance and retention costs | $ | 337 | $ | 79 | $ | 120 | $ | 295 | |||||||
Employee relocation costs | 212 | 42 | 76 | 76 | |||||||||||
549 | 121 | 196 | 371 | ||||||||||||
By reportable segment: | |||||||||||||||
Other | $ | 549 | $ | 121 | $ | 196 | $ | 371 | |||||||
The change in our liability related to our San Diego office transition during the six months ended June 30, 2013, consisted of the following:
Accrued at | Increases for incurred costs | Costs paid | Accrued at | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | December 31, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | |||||||||||||
Employee severance and retention costs | $ | 175 | $ | 120 | $ | (251 | ) | $ | 44 | ||||||
Employee relocation costs | — | 76 | (76 | ) | — | ||||||||||
$ | 175 | $ | 196 | $ | (327 | ) | $ | 44 | |||||||
In January 2013, we implemented a realignment of our workforce in response to changes in the nonprofit industry and global economy. The realignment included a reduction in workforce of approximately 135 positions. The cost associated with this realignment was substantially incurred during the first six months of 2013.
The following table summarizes our restructuring costs related to the reduction in workforce as of June 30, 2013:
Total costs expected to be incurred | Costs incurred during the three months ended | Costs incurred during the six months ended | Cumulative costs incurred as of | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||
By component: | |||||||||||||||
Employee severance costs | $ | 3,200 | $ | 25 | $ | 3,160 | $ | 3,160 | |||||||
By reportable segment: | |||||||||||||||
ECBU | $ | 828 | $ | — | $ | 828 | $ | 828 | |||||||
GMBU | 290 | — | 290 | 290 | |||||||||||
Target Analytics | 136 | — | 136 | 136 | |||||||||||
Other | 1,946 | 25 | 1,906 | 1,906 | |||||||||||
$ | 3,200 | $ | 25 | $ | 3,160 | $ | 3,160 | ||||||||
The change in our liability related to the reduction in workforce during the six months ended June 30, 2013, consisted of the following:
Accrued at | Increases for incurred costs | Costs paid | Accrued at | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | December 31, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | |||||||||||||
Employee severance costs | $ | — | $ | 3,160 | $ | (3,108 | ) | $ | 52 | ||||||
19
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and financial performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those set forth under “Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement” at the beginning of this report and elsewhere in this report, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results. Except as required by law, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
Executive summary
We provide on-premise and cloud-based software solutions and related services designed specifically for nonprofit organizations. Our products and services enable nonprofit organizations to increase donations, reduce fundraising costs, improve communications with constituents, manage their finances and optimize internal operations. As of June 30, 2013, we had over 28,000 active customers distributed across multiple verticals within the nonprofit market including education, foundations, health and human services, religion, arts and cultural, public and societal benefits, environment and animal welfare, as well as international foreign affairs.
We derive revenue from selling perpetual licenses or charging for the use of our software products in a hosted environment and providing a broad offering of services, including consulting, training, installation and implementation services, as well as ongoing customer support and maintenance. Consulting, training and implementation are generally not essential to the functionality of our software products and are sold separately. Furthermore, we derive revenue from providing hosting services, performing donor prospect research engagements, selling lists of potential donors, and providing transaction processing services, benchmarking studies and data modeling services.
In January 2013, we announced that our President and Chief Executive Officer would resign from the Company at the end of 2013, or earlier if a successor is appointed. Our board of directors has a search underway for his replacement.
We completed our acquisition of Convio in May 2012 for $335.7 million in consideration. We have included the results of operations of Convio in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition, which impacts the comparability of our results of operations between 2013 and 2012. Because we have integrated a substantial amount of the Convio operations and have made product rationalization decisions, it is not possible to determine the revenue and operating costs attributable solely to the acquired business.
During the second quarter of 2013, we remained focused on:
• | executing on operational efficiencies and initiating investments to simplify, standardize and automate core back-office systems for future growth; |
• | developing the Raiser's Edge/Luminate Online and CRM/Luminate Online product integrations as well as other product roadmap initiatives; and |
• | continuing the shift in our go-to-market strategy towards subscription-based offerings to meet the needs and preferences of our customers. |
Overall, revenue in the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 increased 14% and 18% compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively. These increases were principally the result of growth in our subscriptions revenue from Luminate Online, previously a Convio product, as well as the continued increase in demand for our online and hosted solutions as our business shifts towards subscription-based offerings. Transaction fees associated with our payment processing services also contributed to the increase in subscription revenue. Services revenue increased during the first six months of 2013 primarily due to growth in consulting service revenue, driven by inclusion of Convio. License revenue increased in the second quarter of 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 as a result of a larger number of sales of our Blackbaud CRM offering to large and/or strategic customers. However, license revenue decreased during the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 as a result of a smaller contribution of revenue from our Blackbaud CRM offerings as well as the continued shift in our business from perpetual licenses to subscription-based offerings.
20
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Income from operations for the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 increased by $16.2 million and $15.5 million when compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively. The increase in income from operations was primarily attributable to (i) a net decrease of $6.3 million and $3.3 million in costs associated with our acquisition of Convio related to transaction and integration costs and amortization of acquired intangibles; (ii) the inclusion of Convio's subscription-based offerings which have historically yielded higher gross margins; (iii) an increase in demand for our online fundraising offerings and our payment processing services, which have also historically yielded higher gross margins; (iv) a $0.8 million and $2.6 million decrease in costs related to strategic investments we made in the first six months of 2012 for our business optimization efforts and the re-engineering of our accounting processes; and (v) a reduction in costs from improved operational efficiencies as we integrated the Convio operations. These items were partially offset by an increase of $0.6 million and $1.2 million in costs associated with our CEO search and CEO severance.
We ended the second quarter of 2013 with cash and cash equivalents totaling $7.3 million and $195.5 million in outstanding borrowings on our credit facility. During the first six months of 2013, we generated $37.5 million in cash flow from operations, paid $11.0 million in dividends, used $10.1 million to purchase computer equipment and software and reduced our debt balance by $20.0 million.
During the second quarter of 2013, we continued to experience growth in overall revenue primarily driven by the inclusion of Convio's product offerings and the growing demand for our subscription-based offerings. However, we continue to believe the pace and impact of economic recovery on the nonprofit market remains uncertain. Notwithstanding these conditions, we plan to further increase our focus on subscription-based offerings as we execute on our key growth initiatives and strengthen our leadership position, while achieving our targeted level of profitability. In the near term, we anticipate there will continue to be a dilutive impact on our profitability as we shift from a license-based model with upfront revenue recognition to a subscription-based model, which recognizes revenue ratably over the agreement term.
We also plan to continue to invest in our back-office processes, the infrastructure that supports our subscription-based offerings and certain product development initiatives to achieve optimal scalability of our operations as we execute on our key growth initiatives.
Comparison of the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
Results of operations
We completed the acquisition of Convio on May 4, 2012. Because we have integrated a substantial amount of the Convio operations and have made product rationalization decisions, it is not possible to determine the revenue and operating costs attributable solely to the acquired business.
We have included the results of operations of Convio in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition, which impacts the comparability of our results of operations between 2013 and 2012. We have noted in the discussion below, to the extent meaningful, the impact on the comparability of our consolidated results of operations due to the inclusion of Convio.
Revenue by segment
The table below compares revenue by segment from our consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, with the same periods in 2012.
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
ECBU | $ | 49.3 | $ | 41.7 | $ | 7.6 | 18 | % | $ | 94.0 | $ | 75.5 | $ | 18.5 | 25 | % | |||||||||||||
GMBU | 55.9 | 49.7 | 6.2 | 12 | % | 108.9 | 93.5 | 15.4 | 16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
IBU | 10.8 | 10.3 | 0.5 | 5 | % | 20.0 | 19.0 | 1.0 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Target Analytics | 9.5 | 8.5 | 1.0 | 12 | % | 18.1 | 16.9 | 1.2 | 7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | — | — | — | % | — | — | — | — | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 125.5 | $ | 110.2 | $ | 15.3 | 14 | % | $ | 241.0 | $ | 204.9 | $ | 36.1 | 18 | % | |||||||||||||
The increases in revenue for ECBU and GMBU during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 were primarily attributable to growth in subscriptions revenue as a result of the inclusion of Luminate
21
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Online, previously a Convio product, and an increase in transaction fees associated with our payment processing services. Also contributing to the growth in GMBU revenue was the continued increase in demand for our online and hosted solutions as our business shifts towards subscription-based offerings. ECBU revenue during the second quarter of 2013 also benefited from an increase in sales of our Blackbaud CRM offering to large and/or strategic customers when compared to the same period in 2012.
IBU revenue increased during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared with the same periods in 2012 primarily due to incremental subscriptions revenue. The growth in IBU subscriptions revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in demand for our online and hosted fundraising solutions as well as an increase in variable transaction fees associated with the use of our products to fundraise online.
Target Analytics revenue growth during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared with the same periods in 2012 was primarily the result of an increase in demand for our prospect research offerings and improved sales execution driven by our new sales leadership team.
Operating results
License fees
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
License fees revenue | $ | 6.0 | $ | 4.5 | $ | 1.5 | 33 | % | $ | 9.0 | $ | 11.7 | $ | (2.7 | ) | (23 | )% | ||||||||||||
Cost of license fees | 0.6 | 0.8 | (0.2 | ) | (25 | )% | 1.4 | 1.4 | — | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||
License fees gross profit | $ | 5.4 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 1.7 | 46 | % | $ | 7.6 | $ | 10.3 | $ | (2.7 | ) | (26 | )% | ||||||||||||
License fees gross margin | 90 | % | 82 | % | 84 | % | 88 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
We derive license fees revenue from the sale of our software products under a perpetual license agreement. During the second quarter of 2013, revenue from license fees increased primarily due to a greater number of Blackbaud CRM sales when compared to the same period in 2012. During the first six months of 2013, revenue from license fees decreased as a result of a smaller contribution of revenue from our Blackbaud CRM and Raiser's Edge offerings when compared to the same period in 2012. Our larger perpetual license transactions, such as those for Blackbaud CRM, have long sales cycles and their timing can result in significant period-to-period variations in revenue. Additionally, we continue to experience a shift in our emerging and mid-sized customers’ buying preferences away from solutions offered under perpetual license arrangements towards subscription-based hosted applications.
Cost of license fees is principally comprised of third-party software royalties, variable reseller commissions, amortization of software development costs and amortization of intangibles from business combinations. The decrease in cost of license fees in the second quarter of 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 is principally attributable to a decrease in third-party software royalties. Third-party software royalties associated with our license-based products have decreased as the demand for our perpetual license arrangements that have third-party software associated with them has decreased. Cost of license fees in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 remained unchanged.
The increase in license fees gross margin in the second quarter of 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 was principally due to a greater number of Blackbaud CRM sales while the costs associated with those sales were relatively unchanged.
The decrease in license fees gross margin in the first six months of 2013 is the result of a smaller contribution of revenue from our Blackbaud CRM and Raiser's Edge offerings when compared to the same period in 2012 while costs were relatively unchanged.
22
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Subscriptions
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subscriptions revenue | $ | 52.0 | $ | 37.9 | $ | 14.1 | 37 | % | $ | 99.7 | $ | 66.0 | $ | 33.7 | 51 | % | |||||||||||||
Cost of subscriptions | 21.6 | 16.6 | 5.0 | 30 | % | 42.0 | 29.5 | 12.5 | 42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Subscriptions gross profit | $ | 30.4 | $ | 21.3 | $ | 9.1 | 43 | % | $ | 57.7 | $ | 36.5 | $ | 21.2 | 58 | % | |||||||||||||
Subscriptions gross margin | 58 | % | 56 | % | 58 | % | 55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue from subscriptions is principally comprised of revenue from providing access to hosted applications and hosting services, access to certain data services and our online subscription training offerings, as well as variable transaction fees associated with the use of our products to fundraise online. We continue to experience growth in our hosted applications business and are experiencing a shift in our emerging and mid-sized customers’ buying preference away from perpetual licenses towards subscription-based offerings. We anticipate that there will continue to be a dilutive impact on our profitability as we shift from a license-based model with upfront revenue recognition to a subscription-based model, which recognizes revenue ratably over the agreement term.
The increase in subscriptions revenue during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 is principally attributable to an increase in demand for our online fundraising offerings, including Luminate Online, previously a Convio product. Also contributing to the growth in subscriptions revenue was an increase in fees associated with our payment processing services driven by an increase in the volume of transactions processed.
Cost of subscriptions is primarily comprised of human resource costs, stock-based compensation expense, third-party royalty and data expenses, hosting expenses, allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs, amortization of intangibles from business combinations and other costs incurred in providing support and services to our customers. The increase in cost of subscriptions in the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 is principally attributable to increases in hosting costs, amortization of intangibles from business combinations, human resource costs and allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs.
Hosting costs increased by $1.1 million and $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively. Amortization of intangibles from business combinations increased by $2.0 million and $5.6 million in the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively. Allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs increased by $1.0 million and $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively. The increases in hosting costs, amortization of intangibles from business combinations and allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs were primarily a result of incremental costs due to the inclusion of Convio. Contributing to the increases in hosting and other allocated costs were investments made to support anticipated growth in our subscription-based offerings.
Human resource costs increased $1.0 million and $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively. Human resource costs increased primarily as a result of an increase in headcount due to the inclusion of Convio.
The increase in subscriptions gross margin during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 was primarily a result of the inclusion of Convio's subscription-based offerings which have historically yielded higher gross margins than our historical products. Historically, Convio subscriptions gross margins were approximately 80% as compared to our subscriptions gross margins of approximately 63%. Also contributing to the increase in subscriptions gross margin was an increase in transaction revenue associated with our payment processing services, which have also historically yielded higher gross margins than our other offerings.
23
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Services
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Services revenue | $ | 31.4 | $ | 31.8 | $ | (0.4 | ) | (1 | )% | $ | 60.2 | $ | 55.8 | $ | 4.4 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of services | 26.5 | 25.3 | 1.2 | 5 | % | 51.9 | 45.3 | 6.6 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Services gross profit | $ | 4.9 | $ | 6.5 | $ | (1.6 | ) | (25 | )% | $ | 8.3 | $ | 10.5 | $ | (2.2 | ) | (21 | )% | |||||||||||
Services gross margin | 16 | % | 20 | % | 14 | % | 19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
We derive services revenue from consulting, installation, implementation, education and analytic services. Consulting, installation and implementation services involve converting data from a customer’s existing system, assistance in file set up and system configuration, and/or process re-engineering. Education services involve customer training activities. Analytic services are comprised of donor prospect research, selling lists of potential donors, benchmarking studies and data modeling services. These services involve the assessment of current and prospective donor information of the customer and are performed using our proprietary analytical tools. The end product enables organizations to more effectively target their fundraising activities. We recognize services revenue attributable to consulting services for implementation of our hosted applications and subscription offerings ratably over the period the customer benefits from those services. We also recognize the direct and incremental costs associated with consulting services revenue ratably over the same period. However, we continue to expense indirect costs in the period the implementation services are provided.
The decrease in services revenue during the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is attributable to a decrease of $1.5 million in consulting services revenue, partially offset by increases in analytic services and education services revenue of $0.8 million and $0.3 million respectively. Consulting services revenue decreased primarily due to the recognition of $1.7 million of revenue during the second quarter of 2012 associated with Blackbaud CRM implementation services provided in prior periods that had been deferred due to delayed billing terms. Implementations on our larger perpetual license transactions such as those for Blackbaud CRM can take an extended period of time, which can result in significant period-to-period variations in revenue if a portion of the fees is subject to delayed billing terms. The rates we charge for our analytic and education services have remained relatively constant year over year, as such, the increases in revenue are the result of increases in volume. Analytic services revenue increased primarily due to an increase in demand for our prospect research offerings and improved sales execution driven by our new sales leadership team. The volume of education services revenue increased due to higher demand for subscription-based training.
The increase in services revenue during the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is attributable to increases in consulting, analytic and education services revenue of $2.6 million, $1.0 and $0.8 million, respectively. Consulting services revenue increased primarily due to the inclusion of Convio. The rates we charge for our analytic and education services have remained relatively constant year over year, as such, the increases in revenue are the result of increases in volume. Analytic services revenue increased primarily due to an increase in demand for our prospect research offerings and improved sales execution driven by our new sales leadership team. The volume of education services revenue increased due to higher demand for subscription-based training.
Cost of services is principally comprised of human resource costs, stock-based compensation expense, third-party contractor expenses, classroom rentals, costs incurred in providing customer training, data expense incurred to perform analytic services, allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs and amortization of intangibles from business combinations. The increase in cost of services in the second quarter of 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 is primarily attributable to an increase in human resource costs. Human resource costs increased $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily as a result of an increase in headcount, accrued bonus costs and merit-based salary increases. The increase in headcount was primarily attributable to the inclusion of additional resources from Convio. Accrued bonus costs increased due to the timing of achieving certain performance metrics.
The increase in cost of services in the first six months of 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 is primarily attributable to an increase in human resource costs, amortization of intangibles from business combinations and allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs. Human resource costs increased $4.4 million in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily as a result of an increase in headcount, accrued bonus costs and merit-based salary increases. The increase in headcount was primarily attributable to the inclusion of additional resources from Convio. Accrued bonus costs increased due to the timing of achieving certain performance metrics. Allocated depreciation and facilities and IT support costs increased $1.0 million due to the inclusion of allocable costs from the Convio operations as well as
24
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
investments we have made in our infrastructure to make our operations more scalable. Amortization of intangibles from business combinations increased $0.4 million due to the inclusion of Convio.
Services gross margin decreased in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to an increase in human resource costs and a decrease services revenue. Services gross margin decreased during the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to increases in human resource costs, amortization of intangibles from business combinations and allocated costs outpacing the growth of services revenue.
Maintenance
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance revenue | $ | 34.1 | $ | 33.9 | $ | 0.2 | 1 | % | $ | 68.3 | $ | 67.4 | $ | 0.9 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
Cost of maintenance | 6.6 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 6 | % | 12.4 | 12.2 | 0.2 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance gross profit | $ | 27.5 | $ | 27.7 | $ | (0.2 | ) | (1 | )% | $ | 55.9 | $ | 55.2 | $ | 0.7 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
Maintenance gross margin | 81 | % | 82 | % | 82 | % | 82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue from maintenance is comprised of annual fees derived from maintenance contracts associated with new software licenses and annual renewals of existing maintenance contracts. These contracts provide customers with updates, enhancements and upgrades to our software products and online, telephone and email support. The increase in maintenance revenue in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is principally comprised of (i) $2.3 million of maintenance from new customers associated with new license agreements and increases in contracts with existing customers and (ii) approximately $1.0 million from maintenance contract inflationary rate adjustments, partially offset by (iii) $2.5 million from maintenance contracts that were not renewed and reductions in contracts with existing customers and (iv) a $0.5 million decrease in maintenance revenue attributable to a change in presentation from gross to net for revenue and costs associated with certain third-party software arrangements that had a change in contractual terms. The net revenue attributable to these third-party software arrangements has been included in "Other revenue" for 2013.
The increase in maintenance revenue in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is principally comprised of (i) $5.0 million of maintenance with new customers associated with new license agreements and increases in contracts with existing customers and (ii) approximately $2.1 million from maintenance contract inflationary rate adjustments, partially offset by (iii) $5.1 million from maintenance contracts that were not renewed and reductions in contracts with existing customers and (iv) $1.0 million decrease in maintenance revenue attributable to a change in presentation from gross to net for revenue and costs associated with certain third-party software arrangements that had a change in contractual terms. The net revenue attributable to these third-party software arrangements has been included in "Other revenue" for 2013.
Cost of maintenance is primarily comprised of human resource costs, stock-based compensation expense, third-party contractor expenses, third-party royalty costs, allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs, amortization of intangibles from business combinations and other costs incurred in providing support and services to our customers. Cost of maintenance increased during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to increases in human resource costs and allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs, partially offset by a decrease in proprietary software costs. The increase in human resource costs resulted from an increase in headcount due to the additional resources needed to support customers using our fundraising offerings. The decrease in proprietary software costs is primarily attributable to a change in presentation from gross to net for revenue and costs associated with certain third-party software arrangements that had a change in contractual terms.
25
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Other revenue
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenue | $ | 2.0 | $ | 2.1 | $ | (0.1 | ) | (5 | )% | $ | 3.9 | $ | 4.0 | $ | (0.1 | ) | (3 | )% | |||||||||||
Cost of other revenue | 1.3 | 1.6 | (0.3 | ) | (19 | )% | 2.5 | 3.1 | (0.6 | ) | (19 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Other gross profit | $ | 0.7 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.2 | 40 | % | $ | 1.4 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 0.5 | 56 | % | |||||||||||||
Other gross margin | 35 | % | 24 | % | 36 | % | 23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenue includes the sale of business forms that are used in conjunction with our software products, reimbursement of travel-related expenses primarily incurred during the performance of services at customer locations, fees from user conferences and third-party software referral fees. Other revenue during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 remained relatively unchanged.
Cost of other revenue includes human resource costs, costs of business forms, costs of user conferences, reimbursable expenses relating to the performance of services at customer locations, allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs and amortization of intangibles from business combinations. Cost of other revenue decreased during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to fewer reimbursable expenses related to services provided at customer locations.
Other gross margin increased in the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 when compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to an increase in third-party software referral fees attributable to a change in presentation from gross to net for revenue and costs associated with certain third-party software arrangements that had a change in contractual terms.
Operating expenses
Sales and marketing
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing expense | $ | 24.4 | $ | 24.2 | $ | 0.2 | 1 | % | $ | 48.8 | $ | 44.6 | $ | 4.2 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||
% of revenue | 19 | % | 22 | % | 20 | % | 22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and related human resource costs, stock-based compensation expense, travel-related expenses, sales commissions, advertising and marketing materials, public relations costs and allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs.
Sales and marketing expense increased in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to a $0.4 million increase in allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in human resource costs. The increase in allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs resulted from both the inclusion of allocable costs from the Convio operations as well as investments we have made in our infrastructure to make our operations more scalable. The decrease in human resource costs is primarily due to a reduction in headcount from a realignment of our workforce.
Sales and marketing expense increased in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to a $2.2 million increase in human resource costs, a $1.4 million increase in allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs and a $0.5 million increase in costs for other marketing expenses. The increase in human resource costs was primarily due to an increase in allocated benefits cost. Allocated benefits cost increased due to a change in allocation methodology. The increase in allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs resulted from both the inclusion of allocable costs from the Convio operations as well as investments we have made in our infrastructure to make our operations more scalable. Other marketing expenses increased as a result of the inclusion of expenses from the Convio operations as well as increased investment in selling and marketing programs to support our offerings.
26
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Research and development
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense | $ | 16.5 | $ | 14.9 | $ | 1.6 | 11 | % | $ | 32.9 | $ | 28.2 | $ | 4.7 | 17 | % | |||||||||||||
% of revenue | 13 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense includes human resource costs, stock-based compensation expense, third-party contractor expenses, software development tools and other expenses related to developing new products, upgrading and enhancing existing products, and allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs.
Research and development expense increased during the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to increased human resource costs of $1.9 million. Human resource costs increased primarily due to an increase in accrued bonus costs, partially offset by an increase in the amount of software development costs that were capitalized. Accrued bonus costs increased due to the timing of achieving certain performance metrics.
Research and development expense increased during the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due increased human resource costs of $4.8 million. Human resource costs increased primarily due to the inclusion of additional headcount from Convio and an increase in accrued bonus costs, partially offset by an increase in the amount of software development costs that were capitalized. Accrued bonus costs increased due to the timing of achieving certain performance metrics.
General and administrative
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense | $ | 12.9 | $ | 21.8 | $ | (8.9 | ) | (41 | )% | $ | 25.6 | $ | 36.3 | $ | (10.7 | ) | (29 | )% | |||||||||||
% of revenue | 10 | % | 20 | % | 11 | % | 18 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense consists primarily of human resource costs for general corporate functions, including senior management, finance, accounting, legal, human resources, corporate development, stock-based compensation expense, third-party professional fees, insurance, allocated depreciation, facilities and IT support costs, acquisition-related expense and other administrative expenses.
General and administrative expense decreased during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to decreases in acquisition-related costs and professional fees partially offset by an increase in human resource costs and costs associated with the replacement of our CEO. Acquisition-related costs associated with our acquisition of Convio decreased $8.5 million and $9.9 million during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively. Professional fees decreased $0.8 million and $2.6 million during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013, respectively. The decrease in professional fees was primarily due to strategic investments made in our business optimization efforts and the re-engineering of our accounting processes during the second quarter of 2012 and the first six months of 2012 that did not recur in the same periods in 2013. Human resource costs increased $1.4 million and $3.0 million during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively. The increase in human resource costs was primarily attributable to additional headcount from Convio and an increase in accrued bonus costs. Accrued bonus costs increased due to the timing of achieving certain performance metrics. We have incurred $0.6 million and $1.2 million in costs during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, respectively, associated with our CEO search and CEO severance.
Restructuring
Restructuring costs consist primarily of one-time severance and termination benefits associated with the realignment of our workforce in response to changes in the nonprofit industry and global economy, as well as the move of our San Diego, California operations to our Austin, Texas location. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we incurred $3.4 million in
27
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
before-tax restructuring charges related to these activities. We expect to incur an additional $0.2 million in restructuring costs during remainder of 2013. We had no restructuring activities during the first six months of 2012.
Non-GAAP income from operations
The operating results analyzed below are presented on a non-GAAP basis. We use non-GAAP income from operations internally in analyzing our operational performance. We exclude the impact of (i) the writedown of Convio's deferred revenue balance, (ii) stock-based compensation expense, (iii) amortization expense, (iv) acquisition integration costs, (v) restructuring costs, (vi) CEO severance, (vii) acquisition-related expenses, (viii) impairment of cost method investment, and (ix) a write-off of proprietary software licenses in determining non-GAAP operating income. We exclude these cash and non-cash expenses from non-GAAP income because they are not directly related to our operating performance in any particular period, but are for our long-term benefit over multiple periods. We believe that this non-GAAP measure reflects our ongoing business in a manner that allows for meaningful period-to-period comparisons and analysis of trends in our business.
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP income from operations | $ | 14.3 | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | 16.2 | (853 | )% | $ | 18.9 | $ | 3.4 | $ | 15.5 | 456 | % | ||||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Convio deferred revenue writedown | 0.3 | 3.5 | (3.2 | ) | (91 | )% | 0.9 | 3.5 | (2.6 | ) | (74 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Add: Stock-based compensation expense | 4.7 | 5.8 | (1.1 | ) | (19 | )% | 9.9 | 9.6 | 0.3 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Add: Amortization of intangibles from business combinations | 6.2 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 51 | % | 12.4 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 103 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Add: Acquisition integration costs | 0.4 | 3.0 | (2.6 | ) | (87 | )% | 1.2 | 3.0 | (1.8 | ) | (60 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Add: Restructuring costs | 0.2 | — | 0.2 | 100 | % | 3.4 | — | 3.4 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Add: CEO Severance | 0.3 | — | 0.3 | 100 | % | 0.6 | — | 0.6 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Add: Acquisition-related expenses | — | 4.2 | (4.2 | ) | (100 | )% | — | 6.4 | (6.4 | ) | (100 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Add: Impairment of cost method investment | — | 0.2 | (0.2 | ) | (100 | )% | 0.2 | (0.2 | ) | (100 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Add: Write-off of prepaid proprietary software licenses | — | 0.4 | (0.4 | ) | (100 | )% | — | 0.4 | (0.4 | ) | (100 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Total Non-GAAP adjustments | 12.1 | 21.2 | (9.1 | ) | (43 | )% | 28.4 | 29.2 | (0.8 | ) | (3 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP income from operations | $ | 26.4 | $ | 19.3 | $ | 7.1 | 37 | % | $ | 47.3 | $ | 32.6 | $ | 14.7 | 45 | % | |||||||||||||
Non-GAAP operating margin | 21 | % | 18 | % | 20 | % | 16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
The increases in non-GAAP income from operations and non-GAAP operating margin during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 were principally due to (i) the inclusion of Convio's subscription-based offerings which have historically yielded higher gross margins; (ii) an increase in demand for our online fundraising offerings and our payment processing services, which have also historically yielded higher gross margins; and (iii) cost synergies realized from our improved operational efficiencies as we integrated the Convio operations. Contributing to these increases were strategic investments made for our business optimization efforts and the re-engineering of our accounting processes during the first six months of 2012 that did not recur in the same period in 2013.
28
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Deferred revenue
The table below compares the components of deferred revenue from our consolidated balance sheets:
(in millions) | Timing of recognition | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Maintenance | Over the term of the agreement, generally one year | $ | 84.6 | $ | 81.7 | $ | 2.9 | 4 | % | |||||||
Subscriptions | Over the term of the agreement, generally one to three years | 69.0 | 65.9 | 3.1 | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Services | As services are delivered | 37.3 | 36.9 | 0.4 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
License fees and other | Upon delivery of the product or service | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 20 | % | ||||||||||
Total deferred revenue | 191.5 | 185.0 | 6.5 | 4 | % | |||||||||||
Less: Long-term portion | (10.6 | ) | (11.1 | ) | 0.5 | (5 | )% | |||||||||
Current portion | $ | 180.9 | $ | 173.9 | $ | 7.0 | 4 | % | ||||||||
To the extent that our customers are billed for our products and services in advance of delivery, we record such amounts in deferred revenue. Deferred revenue attributable to maintenance and subscriptions increased during the first six months of 2013 primarily as a result of an increase in billings for maintenance and subscriptions renewals. We generally invoice our maintenance and subscription customers in annual cycles. Growth in deferred revenue from services during the first six months of 2013 was mostly due to an increase in sales volume of our education services. The increase in deferred revenue from license fees and other was attributable to an increase in registration fees for our annual user conference.
Interest expense
Interest expense during the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 remained relatively unchanged. Interest expense increased $1.5 million during the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. This increase in interest expense is directly related to the borrowings we incurred to fund our acquisition of Convio in May 2012.
Income tax provision
Our effective tax rate, including the effects of period-specific events, was:
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||
Effective tax rate | 47.2 | % | 34.1 | % | 40.3 | % | 64.0 | % | |||
The increase in the effective tax rate during the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is primarily due to an increase in the proportional earnings during the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 relative to the estimated full year earnings for the respective periods. The estimated annual effective tax rate at June 30, 2013 and 2012 was relatively unchanged.
The decrease in the effective tax rate during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is primarily due to an increase in the benefit from research and development credits and a decrease in nondeductible acquisition costs, partially offset by an increase in pretax income. The research and development credits were reinstated in January 2013 with retrospective application to the 2012 tax year. The provision for income taxes differs from the tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due primarily to research and development tax credits, which were partially offset by foreign loss jurisdictions where we have determined a valuation allowance is appropriate, as well as state taxes. Our effective income tax rate may fluctuate quarterly as a result of factors including changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies, valuation allowances, and changes in tax law.
We have deferred tax assets for federal, state, and international net operating loss carryforwards and state tax credits. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to various Internal Revenue Code limitations and applicable state tax laws. The foreign net operating loss carryforwards, a portion of the state net operating loss carryforwards and a portion of state tax credits have a valuation reserve due to the uncertainty of realizing such carryforwards and credits in the future.
29
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate, was $4.1 million at June 30, 2013 and $3.8 million at December 31, 2012. We recognize accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.
Liquidity and capital resources
At June 30, 2013, cash and cash equivalents totaled $7.3 million, compared to $13.5 million at December 31, 2012. The $6.2 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the first six months of 2013 is principally attributable to the payment of dividends of $11.0 million, the purchase of computer equipment and software of $10.1 million, a net reduction in debt of $20.0 million, partially offset by cash generated from operations of $37.5 million.
Our principal sources of liquidity are operating cash flow, funds available under our credit facility and cash on hand. Our operating cash flow depends on continued customer renewal of our maintenance, support and subscription agreements and market acceptance of our products and services. Based on current estimates of revenue and expenses, we believe that the currently available sources of funds and anticipated cash flows from operations will be adequate for at least the next twelve months to finance our operations, fund anticipated capital expenditures, meet our debt obligations and pay dividends. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and our Board of Directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time and for any reason, not to declare or pay further dividends and/or repurchase our common stock.
We have drawn on our credit facility from time to time to help us meet financial needs, such as business acquisitions and purchases of common stock under our repurchase program. In February 2012, we amended and restated our credit facility to increase the available borrowing capacity to $325.0 million. At June 30, 2013, our available borrowing capacity under our credit facility was $111.4 million. We believe our credit facility will provide us with sufficient flexibility to meet our future financial needs.The amended credit facility matures in February 2017.
At June 30, 2013, we had $195.5 million of outstanding borrowings under our credit facility. Our average daily borrowings were $201.7 million and $205.0 million during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013, respectively.
Following is a summary of the financial covenants under our credit facility:
Financial Covenant | Requirement | Ratio as of June 30, 2013 |
Leverage Ratio | < 3.00 to 1.0 | 1.97 to 1.00 |
Interest Coverage Ratio | > 3.50 to 1.0 | 14.65 to 1.00 |
Under our credit facility, we also have restrictions on the maximum amount of our annual capital expenditures, our ability to declare and pay dividends and our ability to repurchase shares of our common stock. In order to pay any cash dividends and/or repurchase shares of stock: (1) no default or event of default shall have occurred and be continuing under the credit facility, and (2) we must be in compliance with the leverage ratio set forth in the credit agreement. At June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all debt covenants under our credit facility. Effective September 30, 2013, the leverage ratio requirement under our credit facility will be < 2.75 to 1.0.
At June 30, 2013, our total cash and cash equivalents balance includes approximately $6.3 million of cash that was held by operations outside the U.S. While these funds may not be needed to fund our U.S. operations for at least the next 12 months, if we need these funds, we may be required to accrue and pay taxes to repatriate the funds. Our current plans anticipate repatriating undistributed earnings in Canada. We currently do not anticipate a need to repatriate our other cash held outside the U.S.
Operating cash flow
Net cash provided by operating activities of $37.5 million increased by $26.5 million during the first six months of 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to an increase in earnings as adjusted for non-cash transactions. Throughout both periods, our cash flows from operations were derived principally from: (i) our earnings from on-going operations prior to non-cash expenses such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation and adjustments to our provision for sales returns and allowances; (ii) the tax benefit associated with our deferred tax asset, which reduces our cash outlay for income tax expense; and (iii) changes in our working capital.
Working capital changes as they impact the statement of cash flows are composed of changes in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities and deferred revenue. Cash flow from
30
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
operations associated with working capital increased $4.5 million in the first six months of 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012. The net increase is principally due to timing of cash paid for taxes and vendor payments.
Investing cash flow
The decrease in cash used for investing activities during the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 is due to an decrease in investments in acquired companies. Additionally, we spent $10.1 million on computer equipment and software associated with the infrastructure that supports our subscription-based offerings.
Financing cash flow
During the first six months of 2013, we had a net reduction in debt of $20.0 million. We paid dividends of $11.0 million, which was relatively consistent with the amount paid in 2012.
Commitments and contingencies
As of June 30, 2013, we had future minimum commitments as follows:
Payments due by period | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-2 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | ||||||||||||||
Operating leases(1) | $ | 98.7 | $ | 9.8 | $ | 20.8 | $ | 20.2 | $ | 47.9 | |||||||||
Debt and interest(2) | 209.7 | 15.8 | 37.6 | 156.3 | — | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 308.4 | $ | 25.6 | $ | 58.4 | $ | 176.5 | $ | 47.9 | |||||||||
(1) | Our commitments related to operating leases have not been reduced by the future minimum lease commitments under sublease agreements, incentive payments and reimbursement of leasehold improvements. |
(2) | Included in the table above is $14.2 million of interest. The actual interest expense recognized in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income will depend on the amount of debt, the length of time the debt is outstanding and the interest rate, which could be different from our assumptions used in the above table. |
The term loans under our credit facility require periodic principal payments. The balance of the term loans and any amounts drawn on the revolving credit loans are due upon maturity of the credit facility in February 2017.
We utilize third-party relationships in conjunction with our products. The contractual arrangements vary in length from one to three years. In certain cases, these arrangements require a minimum annual purchase commitment. The total remaining minimum purchase commitments under these arrangements at June 30, 2013, were approximately $15.4 million through 2016. We incurred expense under these arrangements of $0.7 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
In February 2013, our Board of Directors approved our annual dividend rate of $0.48 per share for 2013. Dividends at the annual rate would aggregate to $22.1 million assuming 46.0 million shares of common stock are outstanding. Our ability to continue to declare and pay dividends quarterly this year and beyond might be restricted by, among other things, the terms of our credit facility, general economic conditions and our ability to generate adequate operating cash flow.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons.
31
Blackbaud, Inc.
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (continued)
Foreign currency exchange rates
Approximately 13% of our total net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was derived from operations outside the United States. We do not have significant operations in countries in which the economy is considered to be highly inflationary. Our consolidated financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars and, accordingly, changes in the exchange rate between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect the translation of our subsidiaries’ financial results into U.S. dollars for purposes of reporting our consolidated financial results. The accumulated currency translation adjustment, recorded within other comprehensive loss as a component of stockholders’ equity, was a loss of $1.2 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
The vast majority of our contracts are entered into by our U.S., Canadian or U.K. entities. The contracts entered into by the U.S. entity are almost always denominated in U.S. dollars, contracts entered into by our Canadian subsidiary are generally denominated in Canadian dollars, and contracts entered into by our U.K., Australian and Netherlands subsidiaries are generally denominated in pounds sterling, Australian dollars and Euros, respectively. Historically, as the U.S. dollar weakened, foreign currency translation resulted in an increase in our revenues and expenses denominated in non-U.S. currencies. During the second quarter of 2013, foreign translation resulted in a decrease in our revenues and expenses denominated in non-U.S. currencies. Though we do not believe our exposure to currency exchange rates has had a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position, we intend to continue to monitor such exposure and take action as appropriate.
Item 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
We have market rate sensitivity for interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Our variable rate debt is our primary financial instrument with market risk exposure for changing interest rates. We manage interest rate risk through a combination of short-term and long-term borrowings and the use of derivative instruments. Due to the nature of our debt, we have concluded that we face no material market risk exposure as of June 30, 2013. For a discussion of our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, see the “Foreign currency exchange rates” section of Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in this report.
Item 4. Controls and procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) are designed only to provide reasonable assurance that they will meet their objectives. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)) pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide the reasonable assurance discussed above.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
No change in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter with respect to our operations, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds
Unregistered sales of equity securities
From March 4 to June 21, 2013, in reliance on section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1993, we issued the following unregistered shares of our common stock to certain employees pursuant to our 2004 Stock Plan and 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended: (a) 9,405 shares of restricted stock; (b) 25,227 shares of stock upon the vesting of restricted stock units; (c) 15,016 shares of stock upon the cashless exercise of stock options; and (d) 257,770 shares of stock upon the exercise of stock appreciation rights.
Common stock repurchases
The following table provides information about shares of common stock repurchased during the three months ended June 30, 2013. All of these were common stock withheld by us to satisfy minimum tax obligations of employees due upon vesting of restricted stock. The level of repurchase activity varies from period to period based upon the timing of grants and vesting as well as employee exercise decisions.
Period | Total number of shares purchased | Average price paid per share | Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or programs (in thousands) | |||||||
Beginning balance, April 1, 2013 | $ | 50,000 | ||||||||
April 1, 2013 through April 30, 2013 | 385 | $ | 29.41 | $ | 50,000 | |||||
May 1, 2013 through May 31, 2013 | 34,065 | $ | 30.36 | $ | 50,000 | |||||
June 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013 | 43,869 | $ | 32.54 | $ | 50,000 | |||||
Total | 78,319 | $ | 31.58 | $ | 50,000 | |||||
33
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits: | |
31.1 | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to liability of that Section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BLACKBAUD, INC. | |||
Date: | August 9, 2013 | By: | /s/ Marc E. Chardon |
Marc E. Chardon | |||
President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
Date: | August 9, 2013 | By: | /s/ Anthony W. Boor |
Anthony W. Boor | |||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||
35