Bridgeline Digital, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File Number: 333-139298
Bridgeline
Software, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
52-2263942
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
10 Sixth
Road
Woburn, MA
|
01801
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(781)
376-5555
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. x
Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such
files). o
Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company.
Large
accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Accelerated
filer
|
¨
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
¨
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
þ
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o
Yes x No
The
number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of
August 12,
2009 was 11,132,827.
Bridgeline
Software, Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
For
the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2009
Index
Page
|
|||
Part
I
|
Financial
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of June 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008
|
4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
5
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
|
6
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
14
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
22
|
|
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
|
Part II
|
Other
Information
|
||
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
23
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
23
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
23
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
23
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
23
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
24
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
24
|
|
Signatures
|
25
|
2
Bridgeline
Software, Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
For
the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2009
|
Statements
contained in this Report on Form 10-Q that are not based on historical
facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology
such as “should,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,”
“anticipate,” “intends,” “continue,” or similar terms or variations of
those terms or the negative of those terms. These statements
appear in a number of places in this Form 10-Q and include statements
regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of Bridgeline
Software, Inc. Forward-looking statements are merely our current
predictions of future events. Investors are cautioned that any such
forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, are not guaranties of
future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may
differ materially from our predictions. Important factors that could cause
actual results to differ from our predictions include our limited
operating history, our license renewal rate, our ability to maintain our
listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the impact of the global financial
deterioration on our business, our inability to manage our future growth
efficiently or profitably, our inability to find, complete and integrate
additional acquisitions, the acceptance of our products, the performance
of our products, our dependence on our management team and key personnel,
our ability to hire and retain future key personnel or the impact of
competition and our ability to maintain margins or market
share. Although we have sought to identify the most significant
risks to our business, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any
of such risks may be realized, nor is there any assurance that we have
identified all possible issues which we might face. We assume no
obligation to update our forward-looking statements to reflect new
information or developments. We urge readers to review carefully the risk
factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008 as well as in the other documents that we file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can read these documents
at www.sec.gov.
Where
we say “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company” or “Bridgeline” we mean Bridgeline
Software, Inc.
|
3
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
Bridgeline
Software, Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2009
|
September
30,
2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 2,833 | $ | 1,911 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
4,073 | 5,662 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
255 | 467 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
7,161 | 8,040 | ||||||
Equipment
and improvements, net
|
1,594 | 1,763 | ||||||
Definite-lived
intangible assets, net
|
1,632 | 2,980 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
13,491 | 10,725 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
653 | 751 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 24,531 | $ | 24,259 | ||||
Liabilities
and stockholders’ equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 722 | $ | 1,770 | ||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,420 | 1,529 | ||||||
Line
of credit
|
1,250 | 1,000 | ||||||
Capital
lease obligations – current
|
80 | 105 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
924 | 1,176 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
4,396 | 5,580 | ||||||
Capital
lease obligations, less current portion
|
79 | 139 | ||||||
Other
long term liabilities
|
488 | 350 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
4,963 | 6,069 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock - $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and
outstanding
|
− | − | ||||||
Common
stock - $0.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 11,132,827 and
10,665,533 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
11 | 11 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
35,478 | 34,647 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(15,808 | ) | (16,369 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
(113 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
19,568 | 18,190 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 24,531 | $ | 24,259 | ||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
4
Bridgeline
Software, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Dollars
in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||||||||||
Application
development services
|
$
|
5,172
|
$
|
4,790
|
$
|
15,846
|
$
|
13,252
|
||||||||
Managed
services
|
597
|
512
|
1,851
|
1,226
|
||||||||||||
Subscription
and perpetual licenses
|
235
|
398
|
879
|
823
|
||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
6,004
|
5,700
|
18,576
|
15,301
|
||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue:
|
||||||||||||||||
Application
development services
|
2,421
|
2,374
|
7,426
|
6,572
|
||||||||||||
Managed
services
|
146
|
129
|
451
|
293
|
||||||||||||
Subscription
and perpetual licenses
|
136
|
128
|
406
|
247
|
||||||||||||
Total
cost of revenue
|
2,703
|
2,631
|
8,283
|
7,112
|
||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
3,301
|
3,069
|
10,293
|
8,189
|
||||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
& marketing
|
1,478
|
1,658
|
4,736
|
4,397
|
||||||||||||
General
& administrative
|
979
|
993
|
3,048
|
2,517
|
||||||||||||
Research
& development
|
336
|
108
|
971
|
406
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
319
|
270
|
911
|
704
|
||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
3,112
|
3,029
|
9,666
|
8,024
|
||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
189
|
40
|
627
|
165
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
—
|
28
|
—
|
14
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income (expense), net
|
—
|
(1)
|
(35
|
)
|
37
|
|||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
189
|
67
|
592
|
216
|
||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
11
|
—
|
31
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
178
|
$
|
67
|
$
|
561
|
$
|
216
|
||||||||
Net
income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.02
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.02
|
||||||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.02
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.02
|
||||||||
Number
of weighted average shares:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
11,109,256
|
9,489,159
|
10,960,777
|
9,139,356
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
|
11,160,082
|
9,589,777
|
11,009,264
|
9,261,419
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
5
Bridgeline
Software, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 561 | $ | 216 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
604 | 395 | ||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
538 | 429 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
463 | 340 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable and unbilled receivables
|
1,167 | (525 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
148 | (724 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(1,349 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Deferred
revenue
|
(252 | ) | (630 | ) | ||||
Other
liabilities
|
138 | 8 | ||||||
Total
adjustments
|
1,457 | (713 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
2,018 | (497 | ) | |||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Equipment
and other asset expenditures
|
(405 | ) | (618 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions,
net of cash acquired
|
— | (924 | ) | |||||
Contingent
acquisition payments
|
(846 | ) | (731 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,251 | ) | (2,273 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from bank line of credit
|
3,250 | — | ||||||
Principal
payments on bank line of credit
|
(3,000 | ) | — | |||||
Principal
payments on capital leases
|
(85 | ) | (172 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
165 | (172 | ) | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
932 | (2,942 | ) | |||||
Effect
of exchange rate on cash
|
(10 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
1,911 | 5,219 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
$ | 2,833 | $ | 2,274 | ||||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid
for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 42 | $ | 47 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 13 | $ | — | ||||
Non
cash activities:
|
||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for acquisitions
|
$ | — | $ | 1,772 | ||||
Issuance
of common stock for contingent acquisition payments
|
$ | 368 | $ | 133 | ||||
Purchase
of equipment through capital leases
|
$ | — | $ | 70 | ||||
Equipment
and other assets included in accounts payable
|
$ | 34 | $ | 88 | ||||
Accrued
contingent consideration
|
$ | 470 | $ | 350 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
6
BRIDGELINE
SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
1.
The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description
of Business
Bridgeline
Software, Inc. (“Bridgeline” or the “Company”), is a developer of web
application management software and interactive business technology solutions.
Bridgeline’s web application management software products, iAPPS®,
Base10® and
Orgitecture™, are primarily SaaS (software as a service) solutions that unify
web Content Management, Analytics, eCommerce, and eMarketing
capabilities. The Company’s in-house team of Microsoft Gold®
certified developers specialize in developing interactive business
technology solutions that include web application development, usability
engineering, SharePoint development, rich media development, search engine
optimization, and fully-managed application hosting.
The
Company’s principal office is located at 10 Sixth Road, Woburn, Massachusetts,
and it maintains regional offices in New York, NY; Arlington, VA; Atlanta, GA;
Chicago, IL; Cleveland, OH and Denver, CO. The Company also operates
a wholly owned subsidiary, Bridgeline Software Pvt. Ltd,, as its .Net
development center located in Bangalore, India. The Company maintains a website
at www.bridgelinesw.com.
Principles
of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its Indian subsidiary. All significant inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts in the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to
conform to the current period’s
presentation. These Consolidated Financial Statements and
accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual
Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008, included in its Annual Report on Form
10-KSB. Unless otherwise stated, references to particular years or
quarters refer to the Company’s fiscal years ended in September and the
associated quarters of those fiscal years.
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
The
accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 and the
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited. The unaudited interim
consolidated statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and in
the opinion of the Company’s management have been prepared on the same basis as
the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
September 30, 2008 and include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments and accruals, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s
financial position at June 30, 2009 and its results of operations and its cash
flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The results for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the year ending September 30, 2009. The accompanying
September 30, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet has been derived from
the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the
information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements.
Certain amounts from the prior period financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification TM and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (the Codification). The
Codification, which was launched on July 1, 2009, became the single source
of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding existing FASB, American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”), Emerging Issues Task Force
(“EITF”) and related literature. The Codification eliminates the GAAP hierarchy
contained in SFAS No. 162 and establishes one level of authoritative GAAP.
All other literature is considered non-authoritative. This Statement is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. The Company will adopt this Statement for its
quarter ending September 30, 2009. There will be no change to the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements due to the implementation of this
Statement.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events.”
This Statement sets forth: (i) the period after the balance sheet date during
which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions
that may occur for
potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (ii) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions
occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (iii)
the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date. This Statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this Statement in the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. This Statement did not impact the consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We evaluated subsequent
events through August 13, 2009, the date of filing of these unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements, and concluded there are no material
subsequent events requiring adjustment to or disclosure in these financial
statements.
7
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS
141R”), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141 (“SFAS 141”), Business
Combinations. This Statement retains the fundamental
requirements in SFAS 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be used for
all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business
combination. SFAS 141R defines the acquirer as the entity that
obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and
establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves
control. SFAS 141R requires an entity to record separately from the
business combination the direct costs of an acquisition as expense, where
previously these costs were included in the total allocated cost of the
acquisition and capitalized. SFAS 141R requires an entity
to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling
interest in the acquired entity at the acquisition date, at their fair values as
of that date. This compares to the cost allocation method previously
required by SFAS No. 141. SFAS 141R also requires an entity to
recognize as an asset or liability at fair value certain contingencies, either
contractual or non-contractual, if certain criteria are met. Finally,
SFAS 141R requires an entity to recognize contingent consideration at the date
of acquisition based on the fair value at that date. This Statement
is effective for business combinations completed in or after the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, or after September 30,
2009 for the Company. Early adoption of this standard is not
permitted and the standard is to be applied prospectively only. Upon
adoption of this standard, there will be no impact to the Company’s results for
acquisitions previously completed. Only acquisitions completed after
September 30, 2009 will be impacted.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No.142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (“SFAS No. 142”). FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited.
We are currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of FSP FAS
142-3 on our consolidated financial statements.
In
November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-06 (“EITF 08-06”), “Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations”. EITF 08-06 addresses the accounting for equity method
investments as a result of the accounting changes prescribed by SFAS No 141(R)
and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS 160”). EITF 08-06 clarifies the
accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving
equity method investments. EITF 08-06 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We
do not believe that the adoption of EITF 08-06 will have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 08-07 (“EITF 08-07”), “Accounting for Defensive Intangible
Assets”. EITF 08-07 mandates that a defensive intangible asset should be
accounted for as a separate unit of accounting. A defensive intangible asset is
an asset that is acquired by an entity that does not intend to actively use the
asset but is preventing others from obtaining access to the asset, except for
intangible assets that are used in research and development activities. The
defensive intangible asset should not be included as part of the cost of the
entity’s existing intangible assets. This standard is effective
for intangible assets acquired on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Upon adoption of this
standard there will be no impact to the Company’s results of operations and
financial condition for acquisitions previously completed.
8
BRIDGELINE
SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
2.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts
receivable consists of the following:
June
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | 3,669 | $ | 4,466 | ||||
Unbilled
receivables
|
753 | 1,576 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(349 | ) | (380 | ) | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
$ | 4,073 | $ | 5,662 |
3.
Acquisitions
Indigio
Group, Inc.
On July
1, 2008, the Company acquired all the outstanding stock of Indigio Group, Inc.
(“Indigio”), a Denver, Colorado-based web development company that provides web
application development, web design, usability, and search engine optimization
services. The acquisition of Indigio expanded the geographical presence of the
Company consistent with its expansion strategy. Consideration for the
acquisition consisted of (i) $600,000 in cash, (ii) 1,127,810 shares of
Bridgeline common stock, (iii) the payment of $195,000 of indebtedness owed
by Indigio, and (iv) contingent consideration of up to $2.1 million payable in
cash quarterly over 14 consecutive calendar quarters after the acquisition. The
contingent consideration is based upon the attainment by the acquired entity of
certain defined operating goals and objectives. The Company accounts for
contingent payments as additional purchase price which is allocated to
goodwill. At June 30, 2009, $195 thousand has been recorded as an
increase to goodwill under this arrangement and the maximum remaining future
consideration payable is approximately $1.9 million.
Tenth
Floor, Inc.
On
January 31, 2008, the Company acquired all the outstanding stock of Tenth Floor,
Inc. (“Tenth Floor”), a Cleveland, Ohio based web application development
company that developed its own SaaS-based web application management software
product named BASE-10. Bridgeline acquired Tenth Floor for total value of
approximately $4 million, including the purchase of approximately $650,000 of
Tenth Floor net working capital (cash, accounts receivable, less certain
liabilities). This value consisted of $504,000 in cash, $96,000 of repayment of
a bank line of credit, 640,000 shares of Bridgeline common stock, and the
opportunity to receive up to an additional $1.2 million in cash over a 12
quarter period based on the attainment of certain minimum operating income goals
and objectives. At June 30, 2009, $567 thousand has been recorded as
an increase to goodwill under this arrangement and the maximum remaining future
consideration is approximately $633 thousand.
The
following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired
through the acquisitions of Tenth Floor and Indigio:
Net
assets acquired:
|
Amount
|
|||
Cash
|
$ | 38 | ||
Other
current assets
|
1,399 | |||
Equipment
|
314 | |||
Other
assets
|
88 | |||
Intangible
assets
|
1,179 | |||
Goodwill
|
5,617 | |||
Total
assets
|
8,635 | |||
Current
liabilities
|
1,547 | |||
Capital
lease obligations
|
189 | |||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
1,736 | |||
Net
assets acquired
|
$ | 6,899 |
9
BRIDGELINE
SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
Purchase
price:
|
||||
Cash
paid
|
$ | 1,430 | ||
Equity
exchanged
|
4,992 | |||
Options
issued and exchanged
|
81 | |||
Closing
costs and fees
|
396 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 6,899 |
Of the
$1.2 million in intangible assets, $737 thousand was assigned to customer
relationships with an average useful life of five years, $175 thousand was
assigned to noncompetition agreements with an average estimated life of five
years and $267 thousand was assigned to acquired technology with an average
estimated life of three years.
4.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The
Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142, which requires
that the Company review goodwill balances for indicators of impairment on an
annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change
that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of goodwill below its
carrying amount. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, a two-step process
is used to (i) identify the potential impairment and to (ii) measure the amount
of impairment if such impairment is indentified under step one. The
impairment is measured by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit
goodwill with the carrying amount of such goodwill.
The
Company completed its annual impairment test for the year ended September 30,
2008 during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. As a result of (i)
economic factors impacting the Company’s business (ii) an overall decline in
organic revenue growth in the second half of fiscal 2008, and (iii) a material
decline in the Company’s stock price since September 30, 2007, the Company
determined that there was an impairment triggering event as provided in SFAS No. 142. At the time of filing of
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, the second step of the impairment
analysis had not been finalized and the Company recorded its best estimate of
impairment of $9.8 million. The final measurement of the impairment was
completed during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 resulting in no change from
the original estimate. The Company also determined that no additional
impairment was incurred during the nine months ended June 30,
2009.
Changes
in the balance of goodwill for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 are as
follows:
For
the
|
||||
Nine
Months
|
||||
Ended
June
30, 2009
|
||||
Goodwill
balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
10,725
|
||
Contingent
acquisition payments
|
1,357
|
|||
Purchase
price allocation adjustments
|
1,409
|
|||
Goodwill
balance at end of period
|
$
|
13,491
|
Contingent
acquisition payments include approximately $368 thousand in payments satisfied
by the issuance of approximately 467,295 shares of common stock at an average
per share price of $0.82 during the nine month period ending June 30, 2009 in
accordance with the terms of the applicable merger agreements.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 141, during the nine month period ending June 30, 2009
the Company recorded purchase price allocation adjustments of approximately $1.4
million. These purchase price allocation adjustments affected
previously recorded amounts for unbilled receivables, customer relationships and
non-compete agreements, principally related to the Company’s acquisition of
Tenth Floor, Inc. and Indigio Group, Inc. completed January 1, 2008 and July 1,
2008, respectively. The Company engaged a third party valuation firm
to assist management in determining the fair value of the definite-lived
intangible assets.
10
BRIDGELINE
SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
The
Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are summarized as
follows:
As
of June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
Asset
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Impairment
|
Net
Amount
|
|||||||||||||
Domain
and trade names
|
$ | 39 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 7 | ||||||
Customer
related
|
2,677 | (1,130 | ) | (63 | ) | 1,484 | ||||||||||
Acquired
software
|
362 | (221 | ) | — | 141 | |||||||||||
Total
intangible assets
|
$ | 3,078 | $ | (1,370 | ) | $ | (76 | ) | $ | 1,632 |
The
Company recognized an impairment charge of $76 thousand to definite-lived
intangible assets in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. The Company determined that there was no additional impairment
to definite-lived intangible assets during the nine months ended June 30,
2009.
5.
Indebtedness
Credit
Facility Borrowings
In
September 2008, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement with
Silicon Valley Bank that provided for a revolving working capital line of credit
of up to the lesser of (a) $1.25 million and (b) 80% of eligible
accounts receivable, subject to specified adjustments. Borrowings under the
credit line were due in September 2009, and subject to interest at 1.0% above
the prime rate. The prime rate was 5.0% per annum at September 30, 2008.
Borrowings were secured by all of the Company’s accounts receivable, investment
property and financial assets. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had a
balance outstanding under the credit line of $1 million which was repaid in
October 2008.
In
December 2008, the Company amended its loan and security agreement with Silicon
Valley Bank. The amendment extended the term of the credit facility
to December 28, 2009 and increased the revolving working capital line of credit
for up to the lesser of (a) $3.0 million and (b) 80% of eligible
accounts receivable, subject to specified adjustments. Borrowings
under the amended working capital line bear interest at 2.0% above the prime
rate, with a minimum interest rate of 8.0%. Borrowings are secured by
all of the Company’s assets. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had a
balance outstanding under the credit line of $1.3 million which was repaid
in July 2009.
6.
Stock Based Compensation
Stock
Option Plans
At June
30, 2009, the Company maintained two stock-based compensation
plans. The Bridgeline Software, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended (the “Bridgeline Plan”) and the Lead Dog 2001 Stock Option Plan (the
“Lead Dog Plan”). The Bridgeline Plan has 2.0 million shares reserved
for issuance and a contractual life of up to ten years. The Lead Dog Plan was
assumed in connection with the Company’s merger with Lead Dog Digital, Inc. in
February 2002. Options under the Lead Dog Plan may be granted for periods of up
to ten years at prices no less than fair market value on the date of
grant. No option grants have been issued under the Lead Dog Plan
subsequent to the February 2002 merger.
Stock
Option Activity
In
October 2008, the Board of Directors approved a modification (the “Repricing
Plan”) for each holder of stock options. Pursuant to the Repricing Plan, each
holder of Bridgeline options was offered the opportunity to have their
outstanding options modified by (i) reducing the granted exercise price to a
lower exercise price equal to the current fair market of the common stock on the
date of the modification and (ii) starting a new three year vesting
schedule.
The fair
value of the modified options was calculated using the difference in value
between the original terms and the new terms as of the modification date. The
incremental cost of the modified option over the original option is being
recognized as additional compensation expense over a three year vesting period
that began on the date of the modification.
11
BRIDGELINE
SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
The
Company granted the following stock options under the Bridgeline Software, Inc.
2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, during the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009:
Weighted
Average Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Estimated
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||||||
Average
|
Fair
Value of
|
Value
at
|
||||||||||||||
Options
|
Exercise
|
Common
Stock
|
Grant
|
|||||||||||||
Granted
|
Prices
|
at
Grant Date
|
Date
|
|||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
100,000 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.06 | $ | — | |||||||||
Nine
Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
1,916,989 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 0.64 – 1.22 | $ | — | |||||||||
The
following table summarizes option activity for all of the Company’s stock
options:
Shares
Covered
By
Options
|
Exercise
Price
per
Share
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2008
|
1,728,691 | $0.003 to $4.900 | $ | 3.06 | ||||||||||||||||
Granted
|
1,916,989 |
0.640 to 1.220
|
0.90 | |||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Cancelled
or Modified
|
(1,621,489 | ) |
0.900 to 4.900
|
3.05 | ||||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(325,300 | ) |
0.750 to 4.600
|
1.15 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2009
|
1,698,881 | $0.003 to $3.750 | $ | 0.91 | 9.25 | $ | 767 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
Stock Options
Price
ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of June 30, 2009 are summarized
below:
Outstanding
Options
|
Exercisable
Options
|
|||||
Exercise
Price
|
Number
of
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
of Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
$0.0030
|
6,667
|
3.25
|
$0.0030
|
6,667
|
$0.0030
|
|
$0.3573
|
3,220
|
2.66
|
$0.3573
|
3,220
|
$0.3573
|
|
$0.6400
|
60,000
|
9.62
|
$0.6400
|
−
|
$0.6400
|
|
$0.7500
|
64,500
|
9.55
|
$0.7500
|
−
|
$0.7500
|
|
$0.8100
|
22,500
|
9.55
|
$0.8100
|
−
|
$0.8100
|
|
$0.9000
|
1,380,539
|
9.28
|
$0.9000
|
−
|
$0.9000
|
|
$1.0600
|
122,500
|
9.70
|
$1.0600
|
−
|
$1.0600
|
|
$1.0716
|
8,539
|
2.66
|
$1.0716
|
8,539
|
$1.0716
|
|
$1.2200
|
20,000
|
9.30
|
$1.2200
|
−
|
$1.2200
|
|
$2.5000
|
3,500
|
8.78
|
$2.5000
|
−
|
$2.5000
|
|
$3.0000
|
4,916
|
3.30
|
$3.0000
|
−
|
$3.0000
|
|
$3.5900
|
1,000
|
8.46
|
$3.5900
|
−
|
$3.5900
|
|
$3.7500
|
1,000
|
5.67
|
$3.7500
|
−
|
$3.7500
|
|
1,698,881
|
18,426
|
|||||
12
BRIDGELINE
SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
Compensation
Expense
Compensation
expense is generally recognized on a graded straight-line basis over the vesting
period of grants. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $611
thousand of unrecognized compensation costs related to share-based payments,
which the Company expects to recognize through fiscal 2012. Options
granted and outstanding include approximately 1.6 million options that were
modified in accordance with the Repricing Plan. The Company estimated
the fair value of the stock option modifications using the Black-Scholes-Merton
Option Valuation Model (the “Model”) and is recording additional stock-based
compensation of approximately $300 thousand over the three year vesting
period
The
assumptions used by the Company to calculate compensation expense for stock
options granted to employees and directors follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
1.8%
|
2.7%
|
1.4%
to 2.8%
|
2.7%
to 4.0%
|
||||
Expected
option life in years
|
6.5
|
5.0
|
6.5
|
5.0
|
||||
Expected
volatility
|
61.0%
|
70.0%
|
61.0%
|
54.0%
to 70.0%
|
||||
Expected
dividend rate
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
Basic net
income per share is computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of
outstanding stock options and warrants using the “treasury stock”
method. The computation of diluted earnings per share does not
include the effect of outstanding stock options and warrants that are
anti-dilutive. The Company has excluded 1,942,455 and 1,529,359 of equity
instruments from the calculation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding
as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively with exercise prices less than market
values because these securities were anti-dilutive.
8.
Income Taxes
The
Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements
or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are
determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis
of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in
which the difference is expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are
provided if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than
not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
The
Company calculates its income tax liability in accordance with FASB
Interpretation 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The Company is
subject to audit by the IRS and various states for tax years 2004 to
2008.
The
Company recorded an income tax provision of $11 thousand and $ -0- for the three
month period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company
recorded an income tax provision of $31 thousand and $-0- for the nine-month
period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These income tax
provisions represent the estimated tax liability for alternative minimum taxes
owed by the Company. The income tax provision for alternative minimum
tax is based on the estimated year-to-date effect of temporary differences
derived from alternative treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes,
reduced by alternative minimum tax net operating loss carryforwards to the
extent allowed. Net operating loss carryforwards are estimated to be
sufficient to offset additional federal taxable income for all periods
presented.
The
Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of
its Indian subsidiary, which the Company considers to be a permanent
investment.
13
Item 2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
This
section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated
in the forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors and risks
including risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on
December 29, 2008 and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
This
section should be read in combination with the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements and related notes prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles.
Overview
Bridgeline
Software, Inc. (“Bridgeline” or the “Company”) is a developer of web application
management software and award-winning interactive business technology solutions
that help organizations optimize business processes. Bridgeline’s
software combined with its interactive services assist customers in maximizing
revenue, improve customer service and loyalty, enhance employee knowledge, and
reduce operational costs by leveraging web based technologies.
Bridgeline’s
iAPPS®
software products are solutions that unify Content Management, Analytics,
eCommerce, and eMarketing capabilities; enabling business users to enhance and
optimize the value of their web properties. Combined with award-winning
interactive business technology solutions, Bridgeline helps customers
cost-effectively accommodate the changing needs of today’s websites, intranets,
extranets, and mission-critical web applications.
The
iAPPS®
software products are delivered through a SaaS business model, in which
we deliver our software over the Internet while providing maintenance, daily
technical operations and support. iAPPS®
provides a flexible architecture so perpetual licensing of the software
is available as well. The Company has standardized on its flagship
iAPPS product suite and plans to sun-set Orgitecture and Base 10 in December of
2010.
Bridgeline’s
team of Gold certified Microsoft developers specialize in providing end-to-end
interactive business technology solutions which include the iAPPS product suite
combined with web application development, usability engineering, SharePoint
development, rich media development, search engine optimization, and web
application hosting management.
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$ | 6,004 | $ | 5,700 | 5% | $ | 18,576 | $ | 15,301 | 21% | ||||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
2,703 | 2,631 | 3% | 8,283 | $ | 7,112 | 16% | |||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
3,301 | 3,069 | 8% | 10,293 | $ | 8,189 | 26% | |||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit margin
|
55% | 54% | 55% | 54% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
3,112 | 3,029 | 3% | 9,666 | 8,024 | 20% | ||||||||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
189 | 40 | 373% | 627 | 165 | 280% | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
— | 28 | — | — | 14 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income, net
|
— | (1 | ) | — | (35 | ) | 37 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
189 | 67 | 182% | 592 | 216 | 174% | ||||||||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
11 | — | — | 31 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 178 | $ | 67 | 166% | $ | 561 | $ | 216 | 160% | ||||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
$ | 768 | $ | 584 | 32% | $ | 2,232 | $ | 1,417 | 58% | ||||||||||||||
14
Revenue
The
Company’s revenue is derived from three sources: (i) Application development
services (ii) managed services and (iii) subscription and perpetual
licenses. Total revenue increased to $6.0 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $5.7 million for the same period of
2008, an increase of 5%. Total revenue increased to $18.6 million for
the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $15.3 million for the same
period of 2008, an increase of 21%.
The
following table sets forth the percentage change for each of the three sources
of revenue and the percentage of total
revenue for each such source for the three month and nine month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
%
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||
Application
development services
|
$ | 5,172 | $ | 4,790 | 8% | $ | 15,846 | $ | 13,252 | 20% | ||||||||||||||
%
of total revenue
|
86% | 84% | 85% | 87% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Managed
services
|
$ | 597 | $ | 512 | 17% | $ | 1,851 | $ | 1,226 | 51% | ||||||||||||||
%
of total revenue
|
10% | 9% | 10% | 8% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subscription
and perpetual licenses
|
$ | 235 | $ | 398 | (41%) | $ | 879 | $ | 823 | 7% | ||||||||||||||
%
of total revenue
|
4% | 7% | 5% | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$ | 6,004 | $ | 5,700 | 5% | $ | 18,576 | $ | 15,301 | 21% |
Application
development services revenue increased 8% and 20% for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2009, respectively, compared to the same periods of
2008. The increases in application development services are attributable to
(i) acquisitions completed after the first fiscal quarter of 2008 combined with
(ii) additional revenue derived from new customer accounts secured in the first
three quarters of fiscal 2009, net of customer attrition.
Application
development services revenue as a percentage of total revenue increased to 86%
from 84% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period of
2008. This increase was due primarily to a higher amount of subscription revenue
being recognized in the June 30, 2009 quarter as compared with a higher amount
of perpetual license revenue being recognized in the June 30, 2008 quarter,
which resulted in application service revenue being a higher percentage of total
revenue. Application development services revenue as a percentage of
total revenue decreased to 85% from 87% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same period of 2008. This decrease is attributable to
a significant increase in managed services revenue for the nine month period
ended June 30, 2009, which resulted in application services revenue being a
lower percentage of total revenue.
Managed
services revenue increased 17% and 51% for the three and nine months ended June
30, 2009, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2008. Managed
services revenue as a percentage of total revenue increased to 10% from 9% for
the three months ending June 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 and to
10% from 8% for the nine months ending June 30, 2009 compared to the same period
of 2008. The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is
attributable to additional revenue derived from new customers, net of
attrition. The increase for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 is
attributable to (i) acquisitions completed after December 31, 2007 combined with
(ii) additional revenue derived from new customers, net of customer
attrition.
Subscription
and perpetual license revenue decreased 41% for the three months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same period of 2008, and increased 7% for the nine months
ended June 30, 2009 compared with the same period in
2008. Subscription and perpetual license revenue as a percentage of
total revenue decreased to 4% from 7% for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and remained constant at 5% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared
with the same period in 2008. The decrease for the three month period ended June
30, 2009 was due primarily to a lower amount of perpetual license revenue
being recognized in the June 30, 2009 quarter as compared with the June 30, 2008
quarter. The increase for the nine month period ended June 30, 2009
was due to additional revenue derived from new customers, net of attrition. The
Company continues to focus its efforts on higher margin software sales and
continues to increase its base of recurring revenue from such
sales.
15
The
Company had approximately 693 customers at June 30, 2009 compared with
approximately 539 customers at June 30, 2008, an increase of 29%.
Approximately 456 of the Company’s customers or 66% pay a monthly subscription
fee or a monthly managed services fee.
For the
three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009, the Company had three
customers and one customer, respectively, that individually represented more
than 5% of its total revenue. For the three and nine month periods
ended June 30, 2008, the Company had two customers and one customer,
respectively, that individually represented greater than 5% of its total
revenue.
Cost
of Revenue
The
following table sets forth the percentage change for cost of revenue and the
percentage of revenue for each cost of revenue for the three month and nine
month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Total
cost of revenue increased to $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 compared with $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, an
increase of 3%. Total cost of revenue increased to $8.3 million for
the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $7.1 million for the nine
months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of 16%.
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
Application
development services
|
$ | 2,421 | $ | 2,374 | 2% | $ | 7,426 | $ | 6,572 | 13% | ||||||||||||||
%
of application development revenue
|
47% | 50% | 47% | 50% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Managed
services
|
$ | 146 | $ | 129 | 13% | $ | 451 | $ | 293 | 54% | ||||||||||||||
%
of managed services revenue
|
24% | 25% | 24% | 24% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subscriptions
and perpetual licenses
|
$ | 136 | $ | 128 | 6% | $ | 406 | $ | 247 | 64% | ||||||||||||||
%
of subscription and perpetual license
revenue
|
58% | 32% | 46% | 30% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
cost of revenue
|
$ | 2,703 | $ | 2,631 | 3% | $ | 8,283 | $ | 7,112 | 16% |
Cost of
application development services increased 2% and 13% for the three and nine
month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in
2008. The cost of application development services as a
percentage of application development services revenue decreased to 47% from
50%, for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same periods in 2008. The increase in cost of application
development services for the three month period is attributable to increases
in direct labor costs to deliver the related increased revenue, which
increased at a higher percentage than the related costs. The decrease in cost of
application development services as a percentage of application development
services revenue is attributable to an effort to shift more customers to the
Company’s SaaS based solutions which are being delivered more efficiently as the
installed base continues to grow.
Cost of
managed services increased 13% for the three months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008. Cost of managed services as a percentage of
managed services revenue decreased to 24% from 25% for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in cost of
managed services is attributable to increases in direct labor costs and
co-managed facility costs to deliver the related increased revenue, which
increased at a higher percentage than the related costs.
Cost of
managed services increased 54% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009, compared
to the same period in 2008. Cost of managed services as a percentage
of managed services revenue remained consistent at 24% for the nine months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The increased cost is related
to (i) acquisitions completed subsequent to December 31, 2007 and (ii) increases
in direct labor costs and co-managed facility costs to deliver the related
increased revenue. Costs of managed services revenue remained
constant for both nine month periods as the Company continued to leverage
capacity in its co-managed facility.
16
Cost of
subscription and perpetual licenses increased 6% for the three months ended June
30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The cost of
subscription and perpetual license revenue as a percentage of subscription
and perpetual license revenue increased to 58% from 32% for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The increase
in subscription and perpetual license cost is attributable to (i) an increase in
SaaS subscription license revenue being recognized in the June 30, 2009 quarter
as compared to a higher amount of perpetual license revenue being recognized in
the June 30, 2008 quarter as discussed above, (ii) amortization of capitalized
software development costs which began during the quarter ended December 31,
2008, and (iii) additional costs to support the infrastructure of our hosting
environment.
Cost of
subscription and perpetual licenses increased 64% for the nine months ended June
30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The cost of
subscription and perpetual licenses increased to 46% from 30% for the nine
months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008. The
increases in subscription and perpetual license cost attributable to
(i) amortization of capitalized software development costs pursuant to SFAS No.
86, which began during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, and (ii)
additional costs to support the infrastructure of our hosting
environment.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit was $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with
$3.0 million for the same period of 2008, an increase of 8%, Gross profit was
$10.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $8.2 million
for the same period of 2008, an increase of 26%. The increase in
gross profit is attributable to (i) acquisitions completed subsequent to
December 31, 2007, (ii) increases in higher margin subscription and perpetual
license revenue, and (iii) leveraging of fixed costs. As a result,
gross profit margins increased to 55% of revenue from 54% of revenue for both
the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period
in 2008.
Operating
Expenses
The
following table sets forth the percentage change and the percentage of total
revenue for operating expenses for the three month and nine month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
Sales
& marketing
|
$ | 1,478 | $ | 1,658 | (11% | ) | $ | 4,736 | $ | 4,397 | 8% | |||||||||||||
%
of total revenue
|
25% | 29% | 25% | 29% | ||||||||||||||||||||
General
& administrative
|
$ | 979 | $ | 993 | (1% | ) | $ | 3,048 | $ | 2,517 | 21% | |||||||||||||
%
of total revenue
|
16% | 17% | 16% | 16% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research
& development
|
$ | 336 | $ | 108 | 211% | $ | 971 | $ | 406 | 139% | ||||||||||||||
%
of total revenue
|
6% | 2% | 5% | 3% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
$ | 319 | $ | 270 | 18% | $ | 911 | $ | 704 | 29% | ||||||||||||||
%
of total revenue
|
5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
$ | 3,112 | $ | 3,029 | 3% | $ | 9,666 | $ | 8,024 | 20% |
Sales and
marketing expenses decreased 11% for the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease is primarily attributable to
(i) a reduction in staff effective in December 2008 and (ii) a reduction in
variable compensation expenses. Sales and marketing expenses
increased 8% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period
in 2008. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) an increase in costs
attributable to an acquisition completed subsequent to June 30, 2008 partially
offset by (ii) reductions in staff effective in December 2008 and (iii) a
reduction in variable compensation expenses.
General
and administrative expenses decreased 1% for the three months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same period in 2008 resulting primarily from a reduction of
variable compensation expenses. General and administrative expenses
increased 21% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008. This increase is primarily due to (i) increases in
personnel, recruiting. consulting and professional fees associated with systems
enhancement for improved internal and public reporting and (ii) increases in
stock-based compensation expense. We believe that general and
administrative expenses will increase in fiscal 2010 as a percentage of revenue
due to costs associated with additional personnel and consultants as the Company
undertakes its implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b)
compliance.
17
Research
and development expenses increased 211% for the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008. Research and development
expenses increased 139% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
same period in 2008. The increase in cost is related (i) to the
relocation of R&D personnel to our corporate offices in Woburn, MA from our
subsidiary in India to continue developing our new on-demand software products,
iAPPS Framework, iAPPS Content Manager, iAPPS Analytics and iAPPS eCommerce and
(ii) software costs expensed in the current period and capitalized in prior
periods in accordance with SFAS 86. Such costs did not meet the
requirements for capitalization in the current period. The Company
will continue to invest in enhancements for its on demand software products in
fiscal 2009 and 2010.
Depreciation
and amortization expense increased 18% for the three months ended June 30, 2009
as compared with the same period in 2008. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased 29% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared with the same period in 2008. These increases are primarily
attributable to (i) additional amortization expense for intangible assets
resulting from acquisitions consummated subsequent to December 31, 2007, and
(ii) additional amortization charges on leasehold improvements related to office
facilities in Illinois and Virginia that commenced in the quarters ending
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively. For the nine
month period ended June 30, 2009, these increases are offset by an
adjustment to amortization expense for definite-lived intangibles assets
recorded in the second fiscal quarter of 2009 related to the final purchase
price allocation for Indigio completed by an independent third party valuation
firm,
Income
from Operations
Income
from operations increased to $178 thousand from $67 thousand, or by 166%, for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the same period in
2008. Income from operations increased to $561 thousand from $216
thousand, or by 160% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the
same period in 2008. The improvement is related to (i) the continued focus
on higher margin revenue, including subscription and perpetual licenses and (ii)
leveraging our infrastructure as revenue increases. Our ability to (i) improve
our revenue mix, particularly by increasing recurring SaaS based subscription
license revenue and (ii) to leverage our existing infrastructure, provides an
opportunity to increase operating margins in excess of our costs as the Company
grows.
Income
Tax Provision
The
Company recorded an income tax provision of $11 thousand and $ -0- for the three
month period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company
recorded an income tax provision of $31 thousand and $-0- for the nine-month
period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These income tax
provisions represent the estimated tax liability for alternative minimum taxes
owed by the Company. The income tax provision for alternative minimum
tax is based on the estimated year-to-date effect of temporary differences
derived from alternative treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes,
reduced by alternative minimum tax net operating loss carryforwards to the
extent allowed. Net operating loss carryforwards are estimated to be
sufficient to offset additional federal taxable income for all periods
presented.
EBITDA
We also
measure our performance based on a non-GAAP measurement of earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization and before stock compensation
expense (EBITDA before stock compensation expense). EBITDA before
stock compensation expense was $768 thousand for the three months ended June 30,
2009, compared with $584 thousand in the same period in 2008, an improvement of
$184 thousand or 32%. EBITDA before stock compensation expense was
$2.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2009, compared with $1.4 million
for the same period in 2008, an improvement of $800 thousand or
58%. We continue to be encouraged by the improvement in our EBITDA
results for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009, and believe
EBIDTA before stock compensation expense is an important measure for
management. We believe that this measure is an indicator of cash flow
being generated from our operations.
18
A table
showing the calculation of EBITDA follows:
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
2009
|
2008
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 178 | $ | 67 | 166% | $ | 561 | $ | 216 | 160% | ||||||||||||||
Plus:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
& tax expense
|
11 | (1 | ) | — | 66 | 37 | 78% | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
398 | 365 | 9% | 1,142 | 824 | 39% | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation
|
181 | 153 | 18% | 463 | 340 | 36% | ||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
$ | 768 | $ | 584 | 32% | $ | 2,232 | $ | 1,417 | 58% | ||||||||||||||
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Overview
Cash
provided from operating activities was $2.0 million for the nine month period
ended June 30, 2009, compared to cash used in operating activities of ($497)
thousand for the same period in fiscal 2008. This improvement is
attributable to the increase in net income and favorable changes in working
capital, including the collection of $1.2 million in accounts
receivable. As we continue to grow, our estimated cash from
operations combined with availability under our line of credit is anticipated to
be sufficient to offset any uses of cash resulting from increases in working
capital needs.
Cash used
in investing activities was $1.3 million to fund capital expenditures and
contingent acquisition payments during the nine month period ended June 30,
2009, compared with $2.3 million during the same period in 2008. The 2008 period
included payments of $924 thousand for acquisitions.
Cash
provided by financing activities was $165 thousand for the nine month period
ended June 30, 2009 which was primarily related to borrowings under the bank
line of credit of $3.3 million in excess of amounts repaid of $3.0
million. For the comparable period in 2008 cash used in financing
activities was $172 thousand related to principal payments on capital
leases. At June 30, 2009, $1.3 million was outstanding under the bank
credit line, which was repaid in July 2009.
In the
nine months ended June 30, 2009 we generated net income. Prior to
this period we incurred annual losses since inception in 2000 and used
significant amounts of cash to fund operations. As a result, at June 30, 2009,
we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $15.8 million.
Capital
Resources and Liquidity Outlook
We
believe that cash requirements for capital expenditures will be approximately
$150,000 for the remainder of fiscal 2009.
Inflation
We
believe that the relatively moderate rates of inflation in recent years have not
had a significant impact on our operations. Inflationary increases
can cause pressure on wages and the cost of benefits offered to
employees. We believe that these increases to date have not had a
significant impact on our operations.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings or other relationships with
unconsolidated entities or other persons other than our operating leases and
contingent acquisition payments.
We
currently do not have any variable interest entities. We do not have any
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as
entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities,
which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance
sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. We are,
therefore, not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit
risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
19
Contractual
Obligations
On
December 29, 2008, Bridgeline Software, Inc. entered into a First Loan
Modification Agreement modifying an existing credit facility with Silicon Valley
Bank. The First Loan Modification Agreement increased the revolving line of
credit from $1,250,000 to $3,000,000 and extended the term of the credit
facility to December 28, 2009. The credit facility is secured by all
assets of the Company.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“US GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance US
GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We
regularly make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities. The most significant estimates include our valuation
of accounts receivable and long-term assets, including intangibles and
deferred tax assets, amounts of revenue to be recognized on service
contracts in progress, unbilled receivables, and deferred revenue. We base our
estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and
various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that
are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced
by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent
there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our
future results of operations will be affected.
The
Company’s significant accounting policies were prepared in accordance with US
GAAP. We consider the following accounting policies to be both those most
important to the portrayal of our financial condition and those that
require the most subjective judgment:
·
|
Revenue
recognition;
|
·
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts;
|
·
|
Accounting
for cost of computer systems to be sold, leased or otherwise
marketed;
|
·
|
Accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets; and
|
·
|
Accounting
for stock-based compensation.
|
These
critical accounting policies and estimates by our management should be read in
conjunction with the critical accounting policies and estimates included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) on December 29, 2008. The Company believes that at June 30,
2009, there has been no material change to this information except as
follows:
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
As a
final requirement to the goodwill impairment evaluation, the amount of
impairment is determined by comparing the implied value of goodwill in a
hypothetical purchase price allocation to the carrying amount of goodwill at the
measurement date. The Company completed the final measurement of
its goodwill impairment during the three months ending March 31, 2009, for which
an estimated impairment charge was taken at September 30, 2008, resulting in no
change from the original estimate. For additional information
refer to Footnote 3 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In
October 2008, the Board of Directors approved the Repricing Plan which totaled
approximately 1.6 million shares. The effect of the modification was
to adjust the exercise price of the applicable options to the fair value of
the
20
underlying
common stock on the date of modification. In addition, the vesting
period on the applicable options was reset to the standard three year term set
forth in our incentive stock option plan. We estimated the fair value
of the stock option modifications using the Model and will record additional
stock-based compensation of approximately $300 thousand over the three year
vesting period. While the Company believes that its estimates are
based on outcomes that are reasonably likely to occur, if actual results
significantly differ from those estimated or if future changes are made to the
Company’s assumptions, the amount of recognized compensation expense could
change significantly. For additional information refer to Footnote 6
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification TM and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (the Codification). The
Codification, which was launched on July 1, 2009, became the single source
of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding existing FASB, American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”), Emerging Issues Task Force
(“EITF”) and related literature. The Codification eliminates the GAAP hierarchy
contained in SFAS No. 162 and establishes one level of authoritative GAAP.
All other literature is considered non-authoritative. This Statement is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. The company will adopt this Statement for its
quarter ending September 30, 2009. There will be no change to the company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements due to the implementation of this
Statement.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events.”
This Statement sets forth: (i) the period after the balance sheet date during
which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions
that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements; (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events
or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements; and (iii) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date. This Statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The company adopted this Statement in the quarter
ended June 30, 2009. This Statement did not impact the consolidated
financial results. We evaluated subsequent events through August 13, 2009, the
date of filing of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, and
concluded there are no material subsequent events requiring adjustment to or
disclosure in these financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS
141R”), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141 (“SFAS 141”), Business
Combinations. This Statement retains the fundamental
requirements in SFAS 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be used for
all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business
combination. SFAS 141R defines the acquirer as the entity that
obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and
establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves
control. SFAS 141R will require an entity to record separately from
the business combination the direct costs, where previously these costs were
included in the total allocated cost of the acquisition. SFAS 141R
will require an entity to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed,
and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at the acquisition date,
at their fair values as of that date. This compares to the cost
allocation method previously required by SFAS No. 141. SFAS 141R will
require an entity to recognize as an asset or liability at fair value for
certain contingencies, either contractual or non-contractual, if certain
criteria are met. Finally, SFAS 141R will require an entity to
recognize contingent consideration at the date of acquisition, based on the fair
value at that date. This Statement will be effective for business
combinations completed in or after the first annual reporting period beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption of this standard is not
permitted and the standards are to be applied prospectively
only. Upon adoption of this standard, there will be no impact to the
Company’s results of operations and financial condition for acquisitions
previously completed. The adoption of this standard will impact any
acquisitions completed by the Company in our fiscal 2010.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No.142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. We are currently
evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-06 (“EITF 08-06”), “Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations”. EITF 08-06 addresses the accounting for equity method
investments as a result of the accounting changes prescribed by SFAS No 141(R)
and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS 160”). EITF 08-06 clarifies the
accounting for certain transaction and impairment considerations involving
equity method investments. EITF 08-06 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We
do not believe that the adoption of EITF 08-06 will have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
21
In
December 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 08-07 (“EITF 08-07”), “Accounting for Defensive Intangible
Assets”. EITF 08-07 mandates that a defensive intangible asset should be
accounted for as a separate unit of accounting. A defensive intangible asset is
an asset that is acquired by an entity that does not intend to actively use the
asset but is preventing others from obtaining access to the asset, except for
intangible assets that are used in research and development activities. The
defensive intangible asset should not be included as part of the cost of the
entity’s existing intangible assets. This standard is effective
for intangible assets acquired on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Upon adoption of this
standard, there will be no impact to the Company’s results of operations and
financial condition for acquisitions previously completed.
Item
3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
Not
required
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating
the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls
and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are
designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures.
As of
June 30, 2009 we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, except as
described below, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
enabling us to record, process, summarize and report information required to be
included in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
within the required time period.
Internal
Controls over Financial Reporting
In
connection with its audit of our financial statements as reported in our Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the SEC on December 29, 2008, our external
auditors, UHY LLP, were concerned that the Company had a control deficiency with
regards to certain internal controls during the years ended September 30, 2008
and 2007. This control deficiency contributed to a material weakness in internal
control with respect to accounting for revenue recognition and equity. A
“material weakness” is a control deficiency or combination of control
deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement in the financial statements or related disclosures will not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis.
We plan
to hire additional personnel, engage with expert consultants, provide training,
and continue to make investments to enhance our systems and improve our internal
controls, specifically in the areas of revenue recognition and
equity. We estimate that the additional cost of this combined effort
will be approximately $100 thousand for the balance of fiscal 2009.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that
occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
22
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
From time
to time we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our
operations. We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings that we
believe are material.
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors.
|
Not
applicable.
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds.
|
The
following summarizes all sales of our unregistered securities during the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2009. The securities in each of the below-referenced
transactions were (i) issued without registration and (ii) were subject to
restrictions under the Securities Act and the securities laws of certain states,
in reliance on the private offering exemptions contained in Sections 4(2), 4(6)
and/or 3(b) of the Securities Act and on Regulation D promulgated thereunder,
and in reliance on similar exemptions under applicable state laws
as transactions not involving a public offering. Unless stated otherwise,
no placement or underwriting fees were paid in connection with these
transactions.
Contingent
Consideration
Objectware,
Inc. – In conjunction with the earn-out provision of the merger agreement, we
issued 57,971 shares of our common stock to the sole stockholder of Objectware,
Inc. as contingent consideration payment.
The
securities issued as contingent consideration were issued to U.S. investors in
reliance upon exemptions from the registration provisions of the Securities Act
set forth in Section 4(2) thereof relative to sales by an issuer not involving
any public offering, to the extent an exemption from such registration was
required.
Other
During
the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company granted 100,000 incentive
stock options under its 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, at a weighted
average exercise price of $1.06 per share.
The
securities were issued exclusively to our directors, executive officers,
employees and consultants. The issuance of options and the shares of common
stock issuable upon the exercise of such options as described above were issued
pursuant to written compensatory plans or arrangements with our employees,
directors and consultants, in reliance on the exemptions from the registration
provisions of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) thereof relative to
sales by an issuer not involving any public offering, to the extent an exemption
from such registration was required.
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
None.
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders.
|
(a) On
April 24, 2009, the Company held its Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
(b) Not
Applicable
(c) At
such meeting, the shareholders of the Company voted:
(1)
|
To
elect two Directors to serve for the ensuing year. The votes cast were as
follows:
|
Nominees
|
Votes
for
|
Votes
Withheld
|
||
Thomas
Massie
|
8,286,723
|
30,734
|
||
William
Coldrick
|
8,275,467
|
41,990
|
23
(2)
|
To
ratify the selection of UHY, LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009. The votes cast were as
follows:
|
Votes
For
|
Votes
Against
|
Abstained
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
|||
8,273,644
|
23,983
|
19,830
|
0
|
(d) Not
Applicable
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
Item 6.
|
Exhibits.
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
of Document
|
|
10.1
|
Employment
Agreement between Bridgeline Software, Inc. and Ronald M. Levenson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form
8-K filed on May15, 2009)
|
|
|
||
10.2
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement between Bridgeline Software, Inc. and Ronald M.
Levenson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on May 15, 2009.)
|
|
31.1
|
CEO
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
CFO
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a).
|
|
|
||
32.1
|
CEO
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
§1350).
|
|
32.2
|
CFO
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
§1350).
|
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Bridgeline
Software, Inc.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
August 13,
2009
|
/s/ Thomas
L. Massie
|
|
Date
|
Thomas
L. Massie
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
August 13,
2009
|
/s/ Ronald
M. Levenson
|
|
Date
|
Ronald
M. Levenson
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
25
INDEX
OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
Description
of Document
|
||
31.1
|
CEO
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a).
|
||
31.2
|
CFO
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a).
|
||
32.1
|
CEO
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
§1350).
|
||
32.2
|
CFO
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
§1350).
|
26