BROOKLINE BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
|
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
|
ý QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period
from to
Commission
file number 0-23695
Brookline
Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
04-3402944
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
160
Washington Street, Brookline, MA
|
02447-0469
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
(617)
730-3500
|
||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. YES ý NO o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer ý Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o Smaller
Reporting Company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO ý
As of
April 30, 2009, the number of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
outstanding was 59,030,686.
|
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM
10-Q
Index
Page
|
||
Part I - Financial Information
Item 1. Financial
Statements
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(In
thousands except share data)
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
16,696
|
$
|
22,270
|
||||
Short-term
investments
|
75,571
|
99,082
|
||||||
Securities
available for sale
|
316,268
|
292,339
|
||||||
Securities
held to maturity (market value of $171 and $171,
respectively)
|
159
|
161
|
||||||
Restricted
equity securities
|
36,335
|
36,335
|
||||||
Loans
|
2,124,251
|
2,105,551
|
||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(28,943
|
)
|
(28,296
|
)
|
||||
Net
loans
|
2,095,308
|
2,077,255
|
||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
8,471
|
8,835
|
||||||
Bank
premises and equipment, net
|
10,189
|
10,218
|
||||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
12,995
|
13,328
|
||||||
Prepaid
income taxes
|
-
|
193
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
43,241
|
43,241
|
||||||
Identified
intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$8,741 and $8,369, respectively |
4,211
|
4,583
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
4,469
|
5,165
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
2,623,913
|
$
|
2,613,005
|
||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
Retail
deposits
|
$
|
1,436,352
|
$
|
1,327,844
|
||||
Brokered
deposits
|
26,381
|
26,381
|
||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
648,775
|
737,418
|
||||||
Mortgagors’
escrow accounts
|
6,014
|
5,655
|
||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
317
|
-
|
||||||
Accrued
expenses and other
liabilities
|
19,895
|
20,040
|
||||||
Total
liabilities.
|
2,137,734
|
2,117,338
|
||||||
Equity:
|
||||||||
Brookline
Bancorp, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized;
64,280,809 shares and 63,746,942 shares issued, respectively |
643
|
637
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
522,114
|
518,712
|
||||||
Retained
earnings, partially restricted
|
24,634
|
38,092
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,806
|
1,385
|
||||||
Treasury
stock, at cost - 5,373,733 shares
|
(62,107
|
)
|
(62,107
|
)
|
||||
Unallocated
common stock held by ESOP - 510,221 shares
and 522,761 shares, respectively |
(2,781 |
)
|
(2,850 |
)
|
||||
Total
Brookline Bancorp, Inc. stockholders’ equity.
|
484,309
|
493,869
|
||||||
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiary
|
1,870
|
1,798
|
||||||
Total
equity
|
486,179
|
495,667
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
2,623,913
|
$
|
2,613,005
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
1
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Income
(In
thousands except share data)
Three
months ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 31,553 | $ | 30,954 | ||||
Debt
securities
|
3,076 | 3,416 | ||||||
Short-term
investments
|
202 | 1,007 | ||||||
Equity
securities
|
23 | 474 | ||||||
Total
interest income
|
34,854 | 35,851 | ||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||
Retail
deposits
|
8,580 | 11,512 | ||||||
Brokered
deposits
|
349 | 911 | ||||||
Borrowed
funds and subordinated debt
|
6,819 | 6,268 | ||||||
Total
interest expense
|
15,748 | 18,691 | ||||||
Net
interest income
|
19,106 | 17,160 | ||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
2,801 | 2,114 | ||||||
Net
interest income after provision for credit losses
|
16,305 | 15,046 | ||||||
Non-interest
income (loss):
|
||||||||
Fees,
charges and other income
|
1,018 | 994 | ||||||
Impairment
loss on securities
|
(779 | ) | (1,249 | ) | ||||
Less
non-credit loss on impairment of securities
|
(53 | ) | - | |||||
Net
impairment loss on securities
|
(726 | ) | (1,249 | ) | ||||
Total
non-interest income (loss)
|
292 | (255 | ) | |||||
Non-interest
expense:
|
||||||||
Compensation
and employee benefits
|
4,966 | 5,348 | ||||||
Occupancy
|
1,045 | 934 | ||||||
Equipment
and data processing
|
1,750 | 1,698 | ||||||
Professional
services
|
645 | 486 | ||||||
Insurance
|
504 | 94 | ||||||
Advertising
and marketing
|
131 | 135 | ||||||
Amortization
of identified intangible assets
|
372 | 438 | ||||||
Other
|
1,307 | 1,170 | ||||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
10,720 | 10,303 | ||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
5,877 | 4,488 | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
2,394 | 1,748 | ||||||
Net
income
|
3,483 | 2,740 | ||||||
Less
net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest in subsidiary |
39 | 46 | ||||||
Net
income attributable to Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
|
$ | 3,444 | $ | 2,694 | ||||
Earnings
per common share attributable to Brookline Bancorp, Inc.:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.06 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Diluted
|
0.06 | 0.05 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding during the period:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
57,919,412 | 57,488,499 | ||||||
Diluted
|
58,052,757 | 57,763,871 |
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
2
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In
thousands)
Three
months ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,483 | $ | 2,740 | ||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of taxes:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
securities holding gains excluding non-credit loss
on impairment of securities |
2 | 1,624 | ||||||
Non-credit
loss on impairment of
securities
|
(76 | ) | - | |||||
Net
unrealized securities holding (losses) gains before income
taxes
|
(74 | ) | 1,624 | |||||
Income
tax (benefit)
expense
|
(28 | ) | 572 | |||||
Net
unrealized securities holding (losses)
gains
|
(46 | ) | 1,052 | |||||
Adjustment
of accumulated obligation
for postretirement benefits |
(8 | ) | - | |||||
Income
tax
benefit
|
3 | - | ||||||
Net
adjustment of accumulated obligation
for postretirement benefits |
(5 | ) | - | |||||
Net
unrealized holding (losses)
gains
|
(51 | ) | 1,052 | |||||
Less
reclassification adjustment for securities loss included in net
income:
|
||||||||
Impairment
loss on
securities
|
(726 | ) | (1,249 | ) | ||||
Income
tax
benefit
|
254 | 448 | ||||||
Net
credit impairment loss on
securities
|
(472 | ) | (801 | ) | ||||
Net
other comprehensive
income
|
421 | 1,853 | ||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
3,904 | 4,593 | ||||||
Net
income attributable to noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary
|
(39 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive
income attributable to Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
|
$ | 3,865 | $ | 4,547 | ||||
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
3
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Equity
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
(Dollars
in thousands)
Common
Stock |
Additional
Paid-in Capital |
Retained
Earnings |
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income |
Treasury
Stock |
Unallocated
Common Stock
Held by ESOP |
Total
Brookline Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders' Equity |
Non-
Controlling Interest
in Subsidiary
|
Total
Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
$ | 633 | $ | 513,949 | $ | 68,875 | $ | 121 | $ | (61,735 | ) | $ | (3,135 | ) | $ | 518,708 | $ | 1,371 | $ | 520,079 | ||||||||
Net
income attributable to
Brookline Bancorp, Inc. |
- | - | 2,694 | - | - | - | 2,694 | - | 2,694 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to
noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | 1,853 | - | - | 1,853 | - | 1,853 | |||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock dividends of
$0.285 per share |
- | - | (16,411 | ) | - | - | - | (16,411 | ) | - | (16,411 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Payment
of dividend equivalent rights
|
- | - | (457 | ) | - | - | - | (457 | ) | - | (457 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
(391,218 shares) |
3 | 696 | - | - | - | - | 699 | - | 699 | |||||||||||||||||||
Reload
stock options granted
(130,518 options) |
- | 59 | - | - | - | - | 59 | - | 59 | |||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
stock purchases
(40,100 shares) |
- | - | - | - | (372 | ) | - | (372 | ) | - | (372 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit from vesting of
recognition and retention plan shares, exercise of non-incentive stock
options, payment of dividend equivalent rights and dividend distributions
on allocated ESOP shares
|
- | 528 | - | - | - | - | 528 | - | 528 | |||||||||||||||||||
Compensation
under recognition
and retention plans |
- | 534 | - | - | - | - | 534 | - | 534 | |||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock held by ESOP committed
to be released (13,053 shares) |
- | 60 | - | - | - | 71 | 131 | - | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
$ | 636 | $ | 515,826 | $ | 54,701 | $ | 1,974 | $ | (62,107 | ) | $ | (3,064 | ) | $ | 507,966 | $ | 1,417 | $ | 509,383 | ||||||||
(Continued)
4
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Equity (Continued)
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
(Dollars
in thousands)
Common
Stock |
Additional
Paid-in Capital |
Retained
Earnings |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income |
Treasury
Stock |
Unallocated
Common Stock Held by ESOP |
Total
Brookline Bancorp, Inc. Stockholders' Equity |
Non-
Controlling Interest in Subsidiary |
Total
Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 637 | $ | 518,712 | $ | 38,092 | $ | 1,385 | $ | (62,107 | ) | $ | (2,850 | ) | $ | 493,869 | $ | 1,798 | $ | 495,667 | |||||||
Net
income attributable to Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
|
- | - | 3,444 | - | - | - | 3,444 | - | 3,444 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income
tax effect on net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 33 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | 421 | - | - | 421 | - | 421 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock dividends of $0.285 per share
|
- | - | (16,499 | ) | - | - | - | (16,499 | ) | - | (16,499 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of dividend equivalent rights
|
- | - | (403 | ) | - | - | - | (403 | ) | - | (403 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options (777,915 shares)
|
5 | 2,563 | - | - | - | - | 2,568 | - | 2,568 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reload
stock options granted (252,937 options)
|
1 | 92 | - | - | - | - | 93 | - | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit from vesting of
recognition and retention plan shares, exercise of non-incentive stock
options, payment of dividend equivalent rights and dividend distributions
on allocated ESOP shares
|
- | 666 | - | - | - | - | 666 | - | 666 | ||||||||||||||||||
Compensation
under recognition and retention plans
|
- | 35 | - | - | - | - | 35 | - | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock held by ESOP committed to be released (12,540
shares)
|
- | 46 | - | - | - | 69 | 115 | - | 115 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
$ | 643 | $ | 522,114 | $ | 24,634 | $ | 1,806 | $ | (62,107 | ) | $ | (2,781 | ) | $ | 484,309 | $ | 1,870 | $ | 486,179 |
See accompanying notes to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(In
thousands)
Three
months ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income attributable to Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
|
$ | 3,444 | $ | 2,694 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
2,801 | 2,114 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
334 | 338 | ||||||
Net
accretion of securities premiums and discounts
|
(44 | ) | (221 | ) | ||||
Amortization
of deferred loan origination costs
|
2,379 | 2,664 | ||||||
Amortization
of identified intangible assets
|
372 | 438 | ||||||
Accretion
of acquisition fair value adjustments
|
(33 | ) | (119 | ) | ||||
Amortization
of mortgage servicing rights
|
10 | 6 | ||||||
Impairment
loss on securities
|
726 | 1,249 | ||||||
Write-down
of other real estate owned
|
- | 40 | ||||||
Net
income attributable to noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary
|
39 | 46 | ||||||
Compensation
under recognition and retention plans
|
35 | 534 | ||||||
Release
of ESOP shares
|
115 | 131 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
110 | (1,000 | ) | |||||
Decrease
in:
|
||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
364 | 405 | ||||||
Prepaid
income taxes
|
193 | 1,553 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
686 | 460 | ||||||
Increase
in income taxes payable
|
350 | - | ||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(153 | ) | 95 | |||||
Net
cash provided from operating activities
|
11,728 | 11,427 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from calls of securities available for sale
|
- | 3,275 | ||||||
Proceeds
from redemptions and maturities of securities available for
sale
|
30,775 | 9,786 | ||||||
Proceeds
from redemptions and maturities of securities held to
maturity
|
2 | 9 | ||||||
Purchase
of securities available for sale
|
(54,718 | ) | (67,409 | ) | ||||
Redemption
of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock
|
- | (222 | ) | |||||
Net
increase in loans
|
(23,207 | ) | (44,594 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of bank premises and equipment
|
(321 | ) | (463 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(47,469 | ) | (99,618 | ) | ||||
(Continued)
6
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
(In
thousands)
Three
months ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Increase
in demand deposits and NOW, savings and money market savings
accounts
|
$ | 40,405 | $ | 17,558 | ||||
Increase
in retail certificates of deposit
|
68,103 | 43,351 | ||||||
Proceeds
from Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances
|
3,777,000 | 108,540 | ||||||
Repayment
of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances
|
(3,865,636 | ) | (116,413 | ) | ||||
Repayment
of subordinated debt
|
- | (7,000 | ) | |||||
Increase
in mortgagors’ escrow accounts
|
359 | 386 | ||||||
Income
tax benefit from vesting of recognition and retention plan shares,
exercise of
non-incentive stock options, payment of dividend equivalent rights and dividend distributions on allocated ESOP shares |
666 | 528 | ||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
2,568 | 699 | ||||||
Reload
stock options granted
|
93 | 59 | ||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
- | (372 | ) | |||||
Payment
of dividends on common stock
|
(16,499 | ) | (16,411 | ) | ||||
Payment
of dividend equivalent rights
|
(403 | ) | (457 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided from financing activities
|
6,656 | 30,468 | ||||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(29,085 | ) | (57,723 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
121,352 | 153,624 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 92,267 | $ | 95,901 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
on deposits and borrowed funds
|
$ | 15,599 | $ | 18,005 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
1,078 | 665 | ||||||
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
7
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation and
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Basis
of Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Brookline Bancorp,
Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Brookline Bank
(“Brookline”) and Brookline Securities Corp. Brookline includes the accounts of
its wholly owned subsidiary, BBS Investment Corporation, and its 86.0% (85.6%
effective April 1, 2009) owned subsidiary, Eastern Funding LLC.
The
Company operates as one reportable segment for financial reporting purposes. All
significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in
consolidation. Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to
conform to the current year’s presentation.
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim
financial information and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals)
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Results for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment in Debt Securities. On April 9, 2009, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2 (“FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2”), “Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”. This FSP amends the
other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for debt securities. Consistent with current requirements for
recording other-than-temporary impairments, this FSP states that the amount of
impairment loss recorded in earnings for a debt security will be the entire
difference between the security’s cost and its fair value if the company intends
to sell the debt security prior to recovery or it is more-likely-than not that
the company will have to sell the debt security prior to recovery. If, however,
the company does not intend to sell the debt security or it concludes that it is
more-likely-than-not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to
recovery, this FSP requires a company to recognize the credit loss component of
an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the
remaining portion of the impairment loss in other comprehensive income. The
credit loss component of an other-than-temporary impairment must be determined
based on a company’s best estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. This
FSP, which becomes effective for interim and annual periods ending after June
15, 2009, allows early adoption for periods ending after March 15, 2009,
provided FSP FAS 157-4 (see Fair Value Measurements below) is adopted at the
same time. The Company adopted this FSP for the period ended March 31, 2009.
Adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Fair
Value Measurements. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair Value Measurements”, which provides
a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. In addition, SFAS 157 specifies a
hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those
techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data
obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the
Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs have the following fair
value hierarchy:
Level
1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets
Level
2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active or non-active markets and
model-derived valuations in which
all
significant inputs and value drivers are observable in active
markets
Level
3 - Valuation derived from significant unobservable inputs
Valuation
techniques based on unobservable inputs are highly subjective and require
judgments regarding significant matters such as the amount and timing of future
cash flows and the selection of discount rates that may appropriately reflect
market and credit risks. Changes in these judgments often have a material impact
on the fair value estimates. In addition, since these estimates are as of a
specific point in time, they are susceptible to material near-term changes. The
fair values disclosed do not reflect any premium or discount that could result
from the sale of a large volume of a particular financial instrument, nor do
they reflect possible tax ramifications or estimated transaction
costs.
8
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
The
Company uses fair value measurements to record certain assets at fair value on a
recurring basis. Additionally, the Company may be required to record at fair
value other assets on a nonrecurring basis. These nonrecurring fair value
adjustments typically involve the application of lower-of-cost-or market value
accounting or write-downs of individual assets. In accordance with FASB Staff Position No. 157-2,
“Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP FAS 157-2”), the Company
applied SFAS 157 as it related to non-financial assets, such as goodwill and
real property held for sale, and non-financial liabilities effective January 1,
2009. Such application did not have a material effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
On April
9, 2009, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position FAS 157-4 (“FSP FAS 157-4”), “Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly”. This FSP
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS
157 when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have
significantly decreased. It also provides guidance on identifying circumstances
that indicate a transaction is not orderly. Determination of whether a
transaction is orderly or not orderly in instances when there has been a
significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or
liability depends on an evaluation of facts and circumstances and requires the
use of significant judgment. This FSP requires a company to disclose the inputs
and valuation techniques used to measure fair value and to discuss changes in
such inputs and valuation techniques, if any, that occurred during the reporting
period. This FSP, which becomes effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009, requires early adoption for periods ending after March 15,
2009 if a company elects to adopt early FSP FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-2 (see
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment in Debt Securities above). The Company adopted
this FSP for the period ended March 31, 2009. Adoption did not have a material
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
On April
9, 2009, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”), “Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”. This FSP requires
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements.
This FSP, which becomes effective for interim reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009, allows early adoption for periods ending after March 15, 2009,
only if a company also elects to early adopt FSP FAS 157-4 and FSP FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2. The Company adopted this FSP for the period ended March 31,
2009.
Noncontrolling
Interest in Subsidiary.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160
establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary. Key changes under the standard are that noncontrolling
interests in a subsidiary will be reported as part of equity, losses allocated
to a noncontrolling interest can result in a deficit balance, and changes in
ownership interests that do not result in a change of control are accounted for
as equity transactions and, upon a loss of control, gain or loss is recognized
and the remaining interest is remeasured at fair value on the date control is
lost. The effective date for applying SFAS 160 is the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted
SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. Adoption did not have a material effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Intangible
Assets. In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position FAS 142-3 (“FSP FAS 142-3”), “Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets”, which amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of
a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of
expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB
Statement No. 141 (revised 2007) (“SFAS 141 R”), “Business Combinations”, and
other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This Statement is effective
for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted
FSP FAS 142-3 on January 1, 2009. Adoption did not have a material effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Earnings
Per Share. In
June 2008, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-01 (“FSP EITF
03-6-01”), “Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities”. This FSP addresses whether instruments granted
in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to
vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in
computing earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method described in
paragraphs 60 and 61 of FASB Statement No. 128 (“SFAS 128”), “Earnings Per
Share”.
9
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
The
guidance in this FSP applies to the calculation of EPS under SFAS 128 for
share-based payment awards with rights to dividends or dividend equivalents.
Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating
securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the
two-class method. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those years. All prior-period
EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including interim
financial statements, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to
conform with the provision of this FSP. The Company adopted FSP on January 1,
2009. Adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
(2) Investment Securities
(Dollars in thousands)
Securities
available for sale and held to maturity are summarized below:
March
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
unrealized
|
unrealized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
cost
|
gains
|
losses
|
fair
value
|
|||||||||||||
Securities
available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Debt
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
$ | 3,003 | $ | 65 | $ | - | $ | 3,068 | ||||||||
Municipal
obligations
|
750 | 25 | - | 775 | ||||||||||||
Auction
rate municipal
obligations
|
5,000 | - | 667 | 4,333 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
obligations
|
4,540 | - | 1,877 | 2,663 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations issued by U.S.
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
82,976 | 1,042 | - | 84,018 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities issued by U.S.
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
216,727 | 3,955 | 92 | 220,590 | ||||||||||||
Total
debt
securities
|
312,996 | 5,087 | 2,636 | 315,447 | ||||||||||||
Marketable
equity
securities
|
826 | 71 | 76 | 821 | ||||||||||||
Total
securities available for
sale
|
$ | 313,822 | $ | 5,158 | 2,712 | $ | 316,268 |
Securities
held to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities issued by U.S.
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
$ | 159 | $ | 12 | $ | - | $ | 171 |
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
unrealized
|
unrealized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
cost
|
gains
|
losses
|
fair
value
|
|||||||||||||
Securities
available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Debt
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
$ | 3,003 | $ | 86 | $ | - | $ | 3,089 | ||||||||
Municipal
obligations
|
750 | 2 | - | 752 | ||||||||||||
Auction
rate municipal
obligations
|
5,200 | - | 683 | 4,517 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
obligations
|
4,594 | - | 1,166 | 3,428 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations issued by U.S.
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
100,614 | 1,019 | - | 101,633 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities issued by U.S.
Government-sponsored
enterprises .
|
174,884 | 2,932 | 73 | 177,743 | ||||||||||||
Total
debt
securities
|
289,045 | 4,039 | 1,922 | 291,162 | ||||||||||||
Marketable
equity
securities
|
1,501 | 98 | 422 | 1,177 | ||||||||||||
Total
securities available for
sale
|
$ | 290,546 | $ | 4,137 | $ | 2,344 | $ | 292,339 |
Securities
held to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities issued by U.S.
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
$ | 161 | $ | 10 | $ | - | $ | 171 |
10
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
Debt
securities of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises include obligations issued
by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, Federal Home Loan Banks and the Federal
Farm Credit Bank. None of those obligations is backed by the full faith and
credit of the U.S. Government except for mortgage-backed securities issued by
Ginnie Mae amounting to $1 at March 31, 2009 and $3 at December 31,
2008.
The
maturities of the investments in debt securities at March 31, 2009 are as
follows:
Available
for sale
|
||||||||
Amortized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||
cost
|
fair
value
|
|||||||
Within
1 year
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
After
1 year through 5 years
|
65,554 | 66,380 | ||||||
After
5 years through 10 years
|
155,070 | 157,998 | ||||||
Over
10 years
|
92,372 | 91,069 | ||||||
$ | 312,996 | $ | 315,447 |
Held
to maturity
|
||||||||
Amortized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||
cost
|
fair
value
|
|||||||
Within
1 year
|
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
After
1 year through 5 years
|
- | - | ||||||
Over
10 years
|
158 | 170 | ||||||
$ | 159 | $ | 171 |
Mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are included above based on
their contractual maturities (primarily 10 years to 15 years at the time of
purchase); the remaining lives at March 31, 2009, however, are expected to be
much shorter due to anticipated payments.
Investment
securities at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 that have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or 12 months or
longer are as follows:
March
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
12
months or longer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
value
|
losses
|
value
|
losses
|
value
|
losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Debt
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||
Municipal
obligations
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Auction
rate
municipal obligations |
4,333 | 667 | - | - | 4,333 | 667 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate
obligations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
With
other-than-temporary
impairment
loss
|
- | - | 155 | 53 | 155 | 53 | ||||||||||||||||||
Without
other-than-temporary
impairment
loss
|
798 | 602 | 1,209 | 1,222 | 2,007 | 1,824 | ||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
11,495 | 92 | - | - | 11,495 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
debt
securities
|
16,626 | 1,361 | 1,364 | 1,275 | 17,990 | 2,636 | ||||||||||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
120 | 14 | 137 | 62 | 257 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
temporarily
impaired
securities
|
$ | 16,746 | $ | 1,375 | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,337 | $ | 18,247 | $ | 2,712 |
11
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
12
months or longer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
value
|
losses
|
value
|
losses
|
value
|
losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Debt
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||
Municipal
obligations
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Auction
rate
municipal obligations |
4,517 | 683 | - | - | 4,517 | 683 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate
obligations :
|
1,103 | 297 | 1,825 | 869 | 2,928 | 1,166 | ||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
15,982 | 73 | - | - | 15,982 | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
debt
securities
|
21,602 | 1,053 | 1,825 | 869 | 23,427 | 1,922 | ||||||||||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
688 | 380 | 155 | 42 | 843 | 422 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
temporarily
impaired
securities
|
$ | 22,290 | $ | 1,433 | $ | 1,980 | $ | 911 | $ | 24,270 | $ | 2,344 |
At March
31, 2009, the Company does not intend to sell any of its debt securities and it
is not likely that it will be required to sell the debt securities before the
anticipated recovery of their remaining amortized cost. The unrealized losses on
auction rate municipal obligations and corporate obligations without
other-than-temporary impairment loss were considered by management to be
temporary in nature. Full collection of those debt securities is expected
because the financial condition of the issuers is considered to be sound, there
has been no default in scheduled payment and the debt securities are rated
investment grade. The unrealized loss on mortgage-backed securities related
primarily to acquisition premiums to be amortized over the estimated remaining
life of the securities. The unrealized loss on marketable equity securities at
March 31, 2009, which related to common stock of a financial institution and a
utility company owned by the Company, was considered to be immaterial to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
At March
31, 2009, corporate obligations included a debt security comprised of a pool of
trust preferred securities issued by several financial institutions with a
remaining unpaid balance of $259. One of the issuers, representing 58% of the
pool, announced that it will defer regularly scheduled interest payments. Due to
the lack of an orderly market for the debt security, its fair value was
determined to be $155 at March 31, 2009 based on analytical modeling taking into
consideration a range of factors normally found in an orderly market. Of the
$104 unrealized loss on the security, based on an analysis of projected cash
flows, $51 was charged to earnings as a credit loss and $53 was recognized in
other comprehensive income.
Impairment
losses on securities charged to earnings in the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008 were $726 and $1,249 respectively. In addition to the $51 credit
loss on the trust preferred security mentioned above, the losses resulted from
write-downs in the carrying value of perpetual preferred stock issued by the
Federal National Mortgage Association ($103 and $773, respectively) and Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. (now Bank of America Corporation) ($572 and $476,
respectively). After the write-downs, the aggregate carrying value of these
perpetual preferred stocks included in marketable equity securities was $392 at
March 31, 2009.
A summary
of the portion of impairment loss on debt securities recognized in earnings for
which a portion of the other-than-temporary impairment was not recognized
follows:
Balance
at January 1, 2009
|
$
|
-
|
||
Amount
of credit loss related to debt securities for which
an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized |
51
|
|||
Balance
of the amount related to credit losses on debt securities held at March
31,
2009 for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income |
$
|
51
|
12
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
(3) Restricted
Equity Securities (Dollars in thousands, except for
figures referred to in millions)
Restricted
equity securities are as follows:
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank of Boston stock
|
$ | 35,961 | $ | 35,961 | ||||
Massachusetts
Savings Bank Life Insurance Company stock
|
253 | 253 | ||||||
Other
stock
|
121 | 121 | ||||||
$ | 36,335 | $ | 36,335 |
As a
voluntary member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston ("FHLB"), the Company
is required to invest in stock of the FHLB in an amount ranging from 3% to 4.5%
of its outstanding advances from the FHLB, depending on the maturity of
individual advances. Stock is purchased at par value. Upon redemption of the
stock, which is at the discretion of the FHLB, the Company would receive an
amount equal to the par value of the stock. Effective December 31, 2008, the
FHLB placed a moratorium on all excess stock repurchases. At March 31, 2009, the
Company’s investment in FHLB stock exceeded its required investment by
$7,429.
The
ability of the FHLB to pay dividends is subject to statutory and regulatory
requirements. On December 14, 2008, the board of directors of the FHLB adopted a
quarterly dividend payout restriction that limits the quarterly dividend payout
to no more that 50% of quarterly earnings in the event that the retained
earnings target exceeds the FHLB’s current level of retained earnings, although
the board of directors of the FHLB retains full discretion over the amount, if
any, and timing of any dividend payout, subject to this payout restriction. The
FHLB’s retained earnings target is $600 million. At December 31, 2008, the FHLB
recorded a net loss of $274.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008,
resulting in an accumulated deficit of $19.7 million. Accordingly, the FHLB did
not pay a dividend for the quarter and is expected to not pay dividends until
the FHLB generates sufficient retained earnings to eliminate the accumulated
deficit. On February 26, 2009, the FHLB announced that dividend payments for
2009 are unlikely. The Company will likely have no dividend income on its FHLB
stock in 2009. In 2008, the Company had dividend income of $1,221, $405 of which
was recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
On April
10, 2009, the FHLB reiterated to its members that, while it currently is meeting
all its regulatory capital requirements, it is focusing on preserving capital in
response to ongoing market volatility. It suspended payment of its quarterly
dividend, extended the moratorium on excess stock repurchases and announced that
its 2008 net loss included a charge to earnings of $381.7 million representing
an other-than-temporary impairment charge on its private-label mortgage-backed
securities portfolio. The estimated fair value of private-label mortgage-backed
securities owned by the FHLB at December 31, 2008 was approximately $1.6 billion
less than the $4.0 billion amortized cost of the securities. In the future, if
additional unrealized losses on the FHLB’s private-label mortgage- backed
securities are deemed to be other-than-temporary, the associated impairment
charges could put into question whether the fair value of the FHLB stock owned
by the Company was less than par value. The FHLB has stated that it expects and
intends to hold its private-label mortgage-backed securities to maturity. The
Company will continue to monitor its investment in FHLB
stock.
13
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
(4) Loans (Dollars in
thousands)
A summary
of loans follows:
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Mortgage
loans:
|
||||||||
One-to-four
family
|
$ | 353,914 | $ | 362,722 | ||||
Multi-family
|
368,333 | 338,677 | ||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
477,059 | 474,847 | ||||||
Construction
and development
|
35,831 | 37,193 | ||||||
Home
equity
|
44,187 | 42,118 | ||||||
Second
|
31,369 | 26,717 | ||||||
Total
mortgage loans
|
1,310,693 | 1,282,274 | ||||||
Indirect
automobile
loans
|
580,094 | 597,230 | ||||||
Commercial
loans -
Eastern
|
150,093 | 147,427 | ||||||
Other
commercial
loans
|
180,856 | 178,887 | ||||||
Other
consumer loans
|
3,944 | 3,979 | ||||||
Total
gross
loans
|
2,225,680 | 2,209,797 | ||||||
Unadvanced
funds on loans
|
(118,212 | ) | (121,709 | ) | ||||
Deferred
loan origination costs:
|
||||||||
Indirect
automobile
loans
|
14,605 | 15,349 | ||||||
Commercial
loans -
Eastern
|
791 | 752 | ||||||
Other
|
1,387 | 1,362 | ||||||
Total
loans
|
$ | 2,124,251 | $ | 2,105,551 |
(5) Allowance for Loan Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
An
analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated
follows:
Three
month ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Balance
at beginning of
period
|
$ | 28,296 | $ | 24,445 | ||||
Provision
for loan
losses
|
2,801 | 2,088 | ||||||
Charge-offs
|
(2,367 | ) | (1,788 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
|
213 | 196 | ||||||
Balance
at end of
period
|
$ | 28,943 | $ | 24,941 |
During the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the liability for unfunded credit
commitments was increased by charges to the provision for credit losses of none
and $26, respectively. The liability, which is included in other liabilities,
was $1,183 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
14
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
(6) Deposits (Dollars in
thousands)
A summary
of deposits follows:
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Demand
checking
accounts
|
$ | 70,913 | $ | 67,769 | ||||
NOW
accounts
|
88,744 | 86,607 | ||||||
Savings
accounts
|
69,919 | 67,473 | ||||||
Guaranteed
savings
accounts
|
19,079 | 16,686 | ||||||
Money
market savings
accounts
|
333,801 | 303,517 | ||||||
Retail
certificate of deposit
accounts
|
853,896 | 785,792 | ||||||
Total
retail
deposits
|
1,436,352 | 1,327,844 | ||||||
Brokered
certificates of
deposit
|
26,381 | 26,381 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
$ | 1,462,733 | $ | 1,354,225 |
(7) Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Dollars in thousands)
Accumulated
other comprehensive income at March 31, 2009 was comprised of (a) unrealized
gains of $1,581 (net of income taxes) on securities available for sale after
recognition of an unrealized loss of $47 (net of income taxes) related to a
corporate obligation included in available for sale securities for which a
portion of an other-than-temporary impairment loss was recognized in earnings
and (b) an unrealized gain of $225 (net of income taxes) related to
postretirement benefits. Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31,
2008 was comprised of an unrealized gain of $1,155 (net of income taxes) on
securities available for sale and an unrealized gain of $230 (net of income
taxes) related to postretirement benefits. Reclassification amounts are
determined using the average cost method. At March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, the resulting net income tax liability, amounted to $1,028 and $805,
respectively.
(8) Commitments and
Contingencies (Dollars in thousands)
Loan
Commitments
At March
31, 2009, the Company had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $47,919,
$10,710 of which were one-to-four family mortgage loans, $11,002 were commercial
real estate mortgage loans, $6,201 were multi-family mortgage loans, $2,415 were
commercial loans to condominium associations and $17,591 were commercial loans.
Unused lines of credit available to customers were $57,769, of which $51,770
were equity lines of credit.
Legal
Proceedings
On
February 21, 2007, Carrie E. Mosca (“Plaintiff”) filed a putative class action
complaint against Brookline Bank in the Superior Court for the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts (the “Action”). Ms. Mosca defaulted on a loan obligation on an
automobile that she co-owned. She alleged that the form of notice of sale of
collateral that the Bank sent to her after she and the co-owner became
delinquent on the loan obligation did not contain information required to be
provided to a consumer under the Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code. The
Action purported to be brought on behalf of a class of individuals to whom the
Bank sent the same form of notice of sale of collateral during the four year
period prior to the filing of the Action. The Action sought statutory damages,
an order restraining the Bank from future use of the form of notice sent to Ms.
Mosca, an order barring the Bank from recovering any deficiency from other
individuals to whom it sent the same form of notice, attorneys’ fees, litigation
expenses and costs. The Bank answered, denying liability and opposing
Plaintiff’s motion to certify a class. The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for
class certification in an order dated July 18, 2008. On July 31, 2008, Plaintiff
served a motion for summary judgment seeking an award of damages in the amount
of approximately $3 to her individually. The Bank opposed that motion and moved
for summary judgment in its favor. On January 26, 2009, the Court denied
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of
the Bank. On February 23, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a notice of
appeal.
In
addition to the above matter, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in
litigation that is considered incidental to the business of the Company.
Management believes the results of such litigation will be immaterial to the
consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the
Company.
15
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
(9) Dividend
Declaration
On April
16, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company approved and declared a regular
quarterly cash dividend of $0.085 per share payable on May 15, 2009 to
stockholders of record on April 30, 2009.
(10) Share-Based Payment
Arrangements (Dollars in thousands, except per share
amounts)
Recognition
and Retention Plans
The
Company has two recognition and retention plans, the “1999 RRP” and the “2003
RRP”. Under both of the plans, shares of the Company’s common stock were
reserved for issuance as restricted stock awards to officers, employees and
non-employee
directors of the Company. Shares issued upon vesting may be either authorized
but unissued shares or reacquired shares held by the Company as treasury shares.
Any shares not issued because vesting requirements are not met will again be
available for issuance under the plans. All shares awarded under the 1999 RRP
vested on or before April 19, 2007. On March 16, 2009, 8,889 shares were awarded
which will vest on March 16, 2010. Another 5,840 unvested shares at March 31,
2009 will vest on October 16, 2009.
Total
expense for the 2003 RRP plan amounted to $35 and $534 for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The compensation cost of non-vested
RRP shares at March 31, 2009 is expected to be charged to expense as follows:
$108 during the nine month period ended December 31, 2009 and $17 during the
year ended December 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2009, the number of shares
available for award under the 1999 RRP and the 2003 RRP were 29,774 shares and
128,831 shares, respectively. The 1999 RRP terminated on April 19,
2009.
Stock
Option Plans
The
Company has two stock option plans, the “1999 Option Plan” and the “2003 Option
Plan”. Under both of the plans, shares of the Company’s common stock were
reserved for issuance to directors, employees and non-employee directors of the
Company. Shares issued upon the exercise of a stock option may be either
authorized but unissued shares or reacquired shares held by the Company as
treasury shares. Any shares subject to an award which expire or are terminated
unexercised will again be available for issuance under the plans. The exercise
price of options awarded is the fair market value of the common stock of the
Company on the date the award is made. Certain of the options include a reload
feature whereby an optionee exercising an option by delivery of shares of common
stock would automatically be granted an additional option at the fair market
value of stock when such additional option is granted equal to the number of
shares so delivered.
On March
16, 2009, 72,512 options were awarded, of which half vested immediately and half
will vest on March 16, 2010. The 1999 Option Plan terminated on April 19,
2009.
16
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
Total
expense for the stock option plans amounted to $93 and $59 for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Activity
under the Company’s stock option plans for the three months ended March 31, 2009
was as follows:
Options
outstanding at January 1, 2009
|
2,249,961 | |||||||
Options
exercised at:
|
||||||||
$
4.944 per option
|
519,312 | |||||||
$
9.47 per option
|
130,518 | |||||||
$
9.65 per option
|
128,085 | |||||||
Total
options exercised
|
(777,915 | ) | ||||||
Reload
options granted at:
|
||||||||
$
9.65 per option
|
128,085 | |||||||
$
9.90 per option
|
124,852 | |||||||
Total
reload options granted
|
252,937 | |||||||
Options
awarded at $9.00 per option
|
72,512 | |||||||
Options
outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
1,797,495 | |||||||
Exercisable
as of March 31, 2009 at:
|
||||||||
$
4.944 per option
|
107,823 | |||||||
$
9.00 per option
|
36,256 | |||||||
$
9.90 per option
|
124,852 | |||||||
$
9.95 per option
|
37,267 | |||||||
$
10.05 per option
|
25,378 | |||||||
$
10.36 per option
|
52,578 | |||||||
$
10.69 per option
|
46,249 | |||||||
$
10.87 per option
|
56,836 | |||||||
$
12.91 per option
|
2,000 | |||||||
$
15.02 per option
|
1,269,000 | |||||||
1,758,239 |
Aggregate
intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable
|
$
|
527
|
Weighted
average exercise price per option
|
$
|
13.26
|
||
Weighted
average fair value per option of options granted during the
period
|
$
|
0.54
|
||
Weighted
average remaining contractual life in years at end of
period
|
3.8
|
As of
March 31, 2009, the number of options available for award under the Company’s
1999 Stock Option Plan and 2003 Stock Option Plan were 285,980 options and
1,153,488 options, respectively.
Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
The
Company maintains an ESOP to provide eligible employees the opportunity to own
Company stock. Employees are eligible to participate in the Plan after reaching
age twenty-one, completion of one year of service and working at least one
thousand hours of consecutive service during the year. Contributions are
allocated to eligible participants on the basis of compensation, subject to
federal tax law limits.
A loan
obtained by the ESOP from the Company to purchase Company common stock is
payable in quarterly installments over 30 years and bears interest at 8.50% per
annum. The loan can be prepaid without penalty. Loan payments are principally
funded by cash contributions from the Bank, subject to federal tax law limits.
The outstanding balance of the loan at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
which was $3,439 and $3,502, respectively, is eliminated in
consolidation.
Shares
used as collateral to secure the loan are released and available for allocation
to eligible employees as the principal and interest on the loan is paid.
Employees vest in their ESOP account at a rate of 20% annually commencing in the
year of completion of three years of credited service or immediately if service
is terminated due to death, retirement, disability or change in control.
Dividends on released shares are credited to the participants’ ESOP accounts.
Dividends on unallocated shares are generally applied towards payment of the
loan. ESOP shares committed to be released are considered outstanding in
determining earnings per share.
17
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
At March
31, 2009, the ESOP held 510,221 unallocated shares at an aggregate cost of
$2,781; the market value of such shares at that date was $4,847. For the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, $115 and $131, respectively, was charged
to compensation expense based on the commitment to release to eligible employees
12,540 shares and 13,053 shares in those respective periods.
(11) Postretirement
Benefits (Dollars
in thousands)
Postretirement
benefits are provided for part of the annual expense of health insurance
premiums for retired employees and their dependents. No contributions are made
by the Company to invest in assets allocated for the purpose of funding this
benefit obligation.
The
following table provides the components of net periodic postretirement benefit
costs for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
15
|
$
|
18
|
||||
Interest
cost
|
13
|
13
|
||||||
Prior
service cost
|
(6
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
||||
Actuarial
(gain) loss
|
(3
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
||||
Net
periodic benefit costs
|
$
|
19
|
$
|
24
|
Benefits
paid amounted to $2 and $3 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
(12) Stockholders’ Equity
(Dollars in thousands)
Capital
Distributions and Restrictions Thereon
OTS
regulations impose limitations on all capital distributions by savings
institutions. Capital distributions include cash dividends, payments to
repurchase or otherwise acquire the institution’s shares, payments to
shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger and other distributions
charged against capital. The regulations establish three tiers of institutions.
An institution, such as the Bank, that exceeds all capital requirements before
and after a proposed capital distribution (“Tier 1 institution”) may, after
prior notice but without the approval of the OTS, make capital distributions
during a year up to 100% of its current year net income plus its retained net
income for the preceding two years not previously distributed. Any additional
capital distributions require OTS approval.
Common
Stock Repurchases
No shares
of the Company’s common stock were repurchased during the three months ended
March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, the Company was authorized to repurchase
up to 4,804,410 shares of its common stock. The Board of Directors has delegated
to the discretion of the Company’s senior management the authority to determine
the timing of the repurchases and the prices at which the repurchases will be
made.
Restricted
Retained Earnings
As part of
the stock offering in 2002 and as required by regulation, Brookline Bank
established a liquidation account for the benefit of eligible account holders
and supplemental eligible account holders who maintain their deposit accounts at
Brookline Bank after the stock offering. In the unlikely event of a complete
liquidation of Brookline Bank (and only in that event), eligible depositors who
continue to maintain deposit accounts at Brookline Bank would be entitled to
receive a distribution from the liquidation account. Accordingly, retained
earnings of the Company are deemed to be restricted up to the balance of the
liquidation account. The liquidation account balance is reduced annually to the
extent that eligible depositors have reduced their qualifying deposits as of
each anniversary date. Subsequent increases in deposit account balances do not
restore an account holder’s interest in the liquidation account. The liquidation
account totaled $29,969 at December 31, 2008.
18
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
(13) Fair Value Disclosures
(Dollars in thousands)
The
following is a summary of the carrying values and estimated fair values of the
Company’s significant financial and non-financial instruments as of the dates
indicated:
March
31, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
value
|
fair
value
|
value
|
fair
value
|
|||||||||||||
Financial
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from
banks
|
$ | 16,696 | $ | 16,696 | $ | 22,270 | $ | 22,270 | ||||||||
Short-term
investments
|
75,571 | 75,571 | 99,082 | 99,082 | ||||||||||||
Securities
|
352,762 | 352,774 | 328,835 | 328,845 | ||||||||||||
Loans,
net
|
2,095,308 | 2,111,792 | 2,077,255 | 2,104,496 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest
receivable
|
8,471 | 8,471 | 8,835 | 8,835 | ||||||||||||
Financial
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Demand,
NOW, savings and money
market
savings
deposits
|
582,456 | 582,456 | 542,052 | 542,052 | ||||||||||||
Retail
certificates of
deposit
|
853,896 | 860,227 | 785,792 | 790,905 | ||||||||||||
Brokered
certificates of
deposit
|
26,381 | 26,605 | 26,381 | 26,605 | ||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
648,775 | 656,398 | 737,418 | 745,954 |
The
following table presents the balances of certain assets reported at fair value
as of March 31, 2009:
Carrying
Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities available for
sale
|
$ | 821 | $ | 309,812 | $ | 5,635 | $ | 316,268 | ||||||||
Assets
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Collateral dependent impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | 1,850 | $ | - | $ | 1,850 |
The
securities comprising the balance in the level 3 column included $5,000 of
auction rate municipal obligations, $1,190 of pools of trust preferred
obligations and a $500 trust preferred obligation issued by a financial
institution, all of which lacked quoted prices in active markets. Based on an
evaluation of market factors, the fair value of the auction rate municipal
obligations was estimated to be $4,333 and, based on cash flow analyses, the
fair value of the pools of trust preferred obligations was estimated to be $802.
In the judgment of management, the fair value of the trust preferred obligation
was considered to approximate its carrying value because it was deemed to be
fully collectible and the rate paid on the security was higher than rates paid
on securities with similar maturities.
During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, the fair value of securities available for
sale using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) declined by $393 as a
result of $200 of redemption of auction rate municipal obligations at their face
value, a $16 increase in the estimated fair value of the auction rate municipal
obligations, a $4 pay down of a trust preferred obligation and a $209 reduction
in the estimated fair value of pools of trust preferred obligations, $51 of
which was recognized as a credit loss charged to earnings.
Collateral
dependent loans that are deemed to be impaired are valued based upon the fair
value of the underlying collateral. The inputs used in the appraisals of the
collateral are observable and, therefore, the loans are categorized as level
2.
The
following is a further description of the principal valuation methods used by
the Company to estimate the fair values of its financial
instruments.
Securities
The fair
value of securities, other than those categorized as level 3 described above, is
based principally on market prices and dealer quotes. Certain fair values are
estimated using pricing models or are based on comparisons to market prices of
similar securities. The fair value of stock in the FHLB equals its carrying
amount since such stock is only redeemable at its par value (See note
3).
19
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
Loans
The fair
value of performing loans is estimated by discounting the contractual cash flows
using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to
borrowers of similar quality. For non-performing loans where the credit quality
of the borrower has deteriorated significantly, fair values are estimated by
discounting cash flows at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with
those cash flows.
Deposit
Liabilities
The fair
values of deposit liabilities with no stated maturity (demand, NOW, savings and
money market savings accounts) are equal to the carrying amounts payable on
demand. The fair value of retail and brokered certificates of deposit represents
contractual cash flows discounted using interest rates currently offered on
deposits with similar characteristics and remaining maturities. The fair value
estimates for deposits do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost
funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of alternative
forms of funding ("deposit based intangibles").
Borrowed
Funds
The fair
value of borrowings from the FHLB represents contractual repayments discounted
using interest rates currently available for borrowings with similar
characteristics and remaining maturities.
Other
Financial Assets and Liabilities
Cash and
due from banks, short-term investments and accrued interest receivable have fair
values which approximate the respective carrying values because the instruments
are payable on demand or have short-term maturities and present relatively low
credit risk and interest rate risk.
Off-Balance
Sheet Financial Instruments
In the
course of originating loans and extending credit, the Company will charge fees
in exchange for its commitment. While these commitment fees have value, the
Company has not estimated their value due to the short-term nature of the
underlying commitments and their immateriality.
20
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward
Looking Statements
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for
forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.
The
following discussion contains forward-looking statements based on management’s
current expectations regarding economic, legislative and regulatory issues that
may impact the Company’s earnings and financial condition in the future. Any
statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be
deemed to be forward-looking statements. Any statements included herein preceded
by, followed by or which include the words “may”, “could”, “should”, “will”,
“would”, “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “intend”, “plan”,
“assume” or similar expressions constitute forward-looking
statements.
Forward-looking
statements, implicitly and explicitly, include assumptions underlying the
statements. While the Company believes the expectations reflected in its
forward-looking statements are reasonable, the statements involve risks and
uncertainties that are subject to change based on various factors, some of which
are outside the control of the Company. The following factors, among others,
could cause the Company’s actual performance to differ materially from the
expectations, forecasts and projections expressed in the forward-looking
statements: general and local economic conditions, changes in interest rates,
demand for loans, real estate values, deposit flows, regulatory considerations,
competition, technological developments, retention and recruitment of qualified
personnel, and market acceptance of the Company’s pricing, products and
services.
Executive
Level Overview
The
following is a summary of operating and financial condition highlights as of and
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Operating Highlights
|
||||||||
Three
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
thousands except per share amounts)
|
||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
19,106
|
$
|
17,160
|
||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
2,801
|
2,114
|
||||||
Net
impairment loss on securities
|
(726
|
)
|
(1,249
|
)
|
||||
Non-interest
income
|
1,018
|
994
|
||||||
Non-interest
expense
|
10,720
|
10,303
|
||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
5,877
|
4,488
|
||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
2,394
|
1,748
|
||||||
Net
income attributable to noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary
|
39
|
46
|
||||||
Net
income attributable to Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
|
3,444
|
2,694
|
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
0.05
|
||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
||||||
Interest
rate spread
|
2.38
|
%
|
2.02
|
%
|
||||
Net
interest margin
|
3.00
|
%
|
2.96
|
%
|
21
Financial Condition
Highlights
|
||||||||||||
At
|
At
|
At
|
||||||||||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2008
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 2,623,913 | $ | 2,613,005 | $ | 2,454,340 | ||||||
Net
loans
|
2,095,308 | 2,077,255 | 1,906,382 | |||||||||
Retail
deposits
|
1,436,352 | 1,327,844 | 1,311,245 | |||||||||
Brokered
deposits
|
26,381 | 26,381 | 67,904 | |||||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
648,775 | 737,418 | 540,134 | |||||||||
Brookline
Bancorp, Inc. stockholders’
equity
|
484,309 | 493,869 | 507,966 | |||||||||
Stockholders’
equity to total
assets
|
18.46 | % | 18.90 | % | 20.70 | % | ||||||
Allowance
for loan
losses
|
$ | 28,943 | $ | 28,296 | $ | 24,941 | ||||||
Non-performing
assets
|
9,107 | 8,195 | 4,743 | |||||||||
Among the
factors that influenced the operating and financial condition highlights
summarized above were the following:
●
|
The interest rate
environment. In both the 2009 and 2008 first quarters, interest
rate spread and net interest margin were greatly influenced by the rate
setting actions of the Federal Open Market Committee (the “FOMC”) of the
Federal Reserve System. The FOMC lowered the rate for overnight federal
funds borrowings between banks three times from 4.25% to 2.25% in the 2008
first quarter and three times from 2.00% to a target range of between zero
and 0.25% in the 2008 fourth quarter. The last rate reduction, which
occurred on December 16, 2008, was the first time in over fifty years that
the rate was lower than 1.00%. The rate reductions had a negative effect
in the 2009 and 2008 first quarters on the yield of the Company’s assets
adjustable to market rates and those assets that replaced maturing or
refinanced assets. The impact on rates paid for certificates of deposit
and borrowed funds was less rapid as many of those liabilities matured
later on. Interest rate spread and net interest margin are expected to
improve in the coming quarters as those liabilities are rolled over at
lower rates of interest. The extent of improvement will depend on how
interest rates for loans, investments, deposits and borrowed funds are
aligned in the market place.
|
●
|
Higher provision for credit
losses. The provision for credit losses was $687,000 higher in the
2009 first quarter than in the 2008 first quarter due primarily to rising
charge-offs in the indirect automobile (“auto”) loan
portfolio.
|
●
|
Impairment losses on
securities. Impairment losses on securities recognized in the 2009
and 2008 first quarters were $726,000 ($472,000 after taxes) and
$1,249,000 ($801,000 after taxes), respectively. The losses resulted
primarily from write-downs in the carrying value of perpetual preferred
stocks.
|
●
|
Lack of dividend income on
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLB”) stock. As a member of the
FHLB, the Company is obliged to own stock in the FHLB based on its level
of borrowings from the FHLB. At March 31, 2009, the Company owned $36.0
million of FHLB stock. Due to reported losses resulting primarily from
impairment in its portfolio of private-label mortgage-backed securities,
the FHLB ceased the payment of dividends on its stock. The Company had no
dividend income on its FHLB stock in the 2009 first quarter compared to
$405,000 of dividend income in the 2008 first quarter. Based on
announcements by the FHLB, no dividend income is expected to be received
for the remainder of 2009.
|
●
|
Asset quality and stockholders’
equity remained strong. While non-performing assets have risen over
the past several quarters, total non-performing assets ($9,107,000)
remained modest equaling 0.35% of total assets at March 31, 2009 compared
to 0.31% ($8,195,000) of total assets at December 31, 2008. The allowance
for loan losses of $28,943,000, expressed as a percent of total loans,
increased to 1.36% at March 31, 2009 from $28,296,000 (1.34%) at December
31, 2008. Stockholders’ equity was $484.3 million at March 31, 2009,
resulting in an equity to assets ratio of 18.46% at that
date.
|
22
Average
Balances, Net Interest Income, Interest Rate Spread and Net Interest
Margin
The
following table sets forth information about the Company’s average balances,
interest income and rates earned on average interest-earning assets, interest
expense and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, interest rate spread and
net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Average
balances are derived from daily average balances and yields include fees and
costs which are considered adjustments to yields.
Three
months ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
Interest
(1)
|
Average
yield/
cost
|
Average
balance
|
Interest
(1)
|
Average
yield/
cost
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Short-term
investments
|
$
|
100,736
|
202
|
0.81
|
%
|
$
|
111,233
|
$
|
1,007
|
3.64
|
%
|
|||||
Debt
securities (2)
|
287,279
|
3,086
|
4.30
|
287,839
|
3,502
|
4.87
|
||||||||||
Equity
securities (2)
|
37,295
|
33
|
0.35
|
32,236
|
500
|
6.23
|
||||||||||
Mortgage
loans (3)
|
1,240,550
|
17,182
|
5.54
|
1,046,967
|
16,095
|
6.15
|
||||||||||
Commercial
loans -Eastern Funding (3)
|
149,300
|
3,412
|
9.14
|
142,289
|
3,506
|
9.86
|
||||||||||
Other
commercial loans (3)
|
116,472
|
1,302
|
4.51
|
105,500
|
1,601
|
6.07
|
||||||||||
Indirect
automobile loans (3)
|
604,891
|
9,600
|
6.44
|
605,396
|
9,682
|
6.43
|
||||||||||
Other
consumer loans (3)
|
3,762
|
56
|
5.95
|
3,669
|
70
|
7.63
|
||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
2,540,285
|
34,873
|
5.52
|
%
|
2,335,129
|
35,963
|
6.18
|
%
|
||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(28,286
|
)
|
(24,294
|
)
|
||||||||||||
Non-interest
earning assets
|
108,094
|
99,547
|
||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
2,620,093
|
$
|
2,410,382
|
||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
$
|
83,834
|
40
|
0.19
|
%
|
$
|
81,353
|
46
|
0.23
|
%
|
||||||
Savings
accounts
|
86,011
|
268
|
1.26
|
87,244
|
328
|
1.51
|
||||||||||
Money
market savings accounts
|
315,180
|
1,616
|
2.08
|
220,661
|
1,553
|
2.83
|
||||||||||
Retail
certificates of deposit
|
825,774
|
6,656
|
3.27
|
815,509
|
9,585
|
4.73
|
||||||||||
Total
retail deposits
|
1,310,799
|
8,580
|
2.65
|
1,204,767
|
11,512
|
3.84
|
||||||||||
Brokered
certificates of deposit
|
26,381
|
349
|
5.37
|
67,904
|
911
|
5.40
|
||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
1,337,180
|
8,929
|
2.71
|
1,272,671
|
12,423
|
3.93
|
||||||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
698,489
|
6,819
|
3.91
|
531,967
|
6,203
|
4.61
|
||||||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,465
|
65
|
7.42
|
||||||||||
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
2,035,669
|
15,748
|
3.14
|
%
|
1,808,103
|
18,691
|
4.16
|
%
|
||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
demand checking
accounts
|
67,301
|
62,532
|
||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
26,171
|
24,417
|
||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
2,129,141
|
1,895,052
|
||||||||||||||
Brookline
Bancorp, Inc. stockholders’ equity
|
489,129
|
513,612
|
||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiary
|
1,823
|
1,718
|
||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
2,620,093
|
$
|
2,410,382
|
||||||||||||
Net
interest income (tax equivalent basis)/interest rate spread
(4)
|
19,125
|
2.38
|
%
|
17,272
|
2.02
|
%
|
||||||||||
Less
adjustment of tax exempt income
|
19
|
112
|
||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
19,106
|
$
|
17,160
|
|||||||||||||
Net
interest margin (5)
|
3.00
|
%
|
2.96
|
%
|
(2)
Average
balances include unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale.
Equity securities include marketable equity securities (preferred and common
stocks)
and restricted equity securities.
and restricted equity securities.
(3)
Loans on non-accrual status are included in average
balances.
(4)
Interest
rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning
assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)
Net interest margin represents net interest income (tax equivalent basis)
divided by average interest-earning assets.
23
Highlights
from the table on the preceding page follow.
●
|
Net
interest income was 11.3% higher in the 2009 first quarter than in the
2008 first quarter due to improvement in interest rate spread and $205
million (8.8%) of growth in the average balance of interest-earnings
assets, most of which was in the loan
portfolio.
|
●
|
Interest
rate spread increased to 2.38% in the 2009 first quarter from 2.02% in the
2008 first quarter, but declined from 2.57% in the 2008 fourth quarter.
The fluctuations resulted primarily from the movements in the federal
funds overnight borrowing rates initiated by the FOMC and elimination of
dividend income on FHLB stock owned by the Company mentioned earlier
herein.
|
●
|
Net
interest margin improved to 3.00% in the 2009 first quarter from 2.96% in
the 2008 first quarter, but declined from 3.22% in the 2008 fourth
quarter. The fluctuations resulted primarily from the matters mentioned
above and foregone interest income of approximately $192,000 in the 2009
first quarter caused by the $24.5 million reduction in the average balance
of stockholders’ equity between the 2009 and 2008 first quarters. The
reduction resulted primarily from payments to stockholders of extra
dividends of $0.20 per share each in August 2008 and February
2009.
|
●
|
The
average balance of total loans outstanding as a percent of the average
balance of total interest-earning assets increased from 81.5% in the 2008
first quarter to 83.3% in the 2009 first quarter. Much of the loan growth
was in commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans. Generally,
the yield on loans is higher than the yield on investment
securities.
|
●
|
The
average balance of short-term investments in the 2009 first quarter was
$100.7 million, or 9.4% less than the average balance in the 2008 first
quarter. Interest income on short-term investments, however, declined
$805,000, or 79.9%, between the two periods caused primarily by the effect
of the interest rate environment described earlier
herein.
|
●
|
The
average balance of retail deposits in the 2009 first quarter increased
$106.0 million (8.8%) compared to the average balance in the 2008 first
quarter, $94.5 million of which was in money market savings accounts, and
$69.8 million (5.6%) compared to the average balance in the 2008 fourth
quarter, $63.5 million of which was in certificates of deposit with
maturities primarily in the range of six months. Expressed as a percent of
total retail deposits, certificates of deposit declined from 64.0% at
March 31, 2008 to 59.2% at December 31, 2008, but rose to 59.4% at March
31, 2009, while money market savings accounts rose from 17.6% to 22.9% and
23.2% at those respective dates. Since money market savings accounts can
be withdrawn at any time, the interest rate paid on those deposits is
generally lower than the interest rates paid on certificates of deposit.
We believe the shift in the mix of deposits was attributable primarily to
the recent turmoil in the financial markets which led a number of
depositors to place their funds in more liquid
accounts.
|
●
|
The
average rate paid on retail deposits declined from 3.84% in the 2008 first
quarter to 2.80% in the 2008 fourth quarter and 2.65% in the 2009 first
quarter. Rates paid are influenced not only by the rate setting
initiatives of the FOMC, but also by competitor rates. Depending on
liquidity needs and other factors, occasionally competitors offer rates
above those offered in the market
place.
|
●
|
The
average balance of borrowings from the FHLB increased from $532.0 million
in the 2008 first quarter to $737.3 million in the 2008 fourth quarter and
declined to $698.5 million in the 2009 first quarter. The average rate
paid on those funds was 4.61%, 3.81% and 3.91% in those respective
periods. The rate increase in the most recent quarter resulted from the
use of deposit inflow to pay down short-term borrowings with low interest
rates. The average rate paid on FHLB borrowings is expected to decline in
coming quarters as $84.5 million of borrowings with an average rate of
4.90% will mature in the 2009 second quarter, $54.0 million with an
average rate of 5.11% will mature in the 2009 third quarter and $91.5
million with an average rate of 4.09% will mature in the 2009 fourth
quarter. Additionally, $26.4 million of brokered deposits with an average
rate of 5.37% will mature in the 2009 second
quarter.
|
Auto
Loans
The auto
loan portfolio amounted to $580.1 million at March 31, 2009 compared to $597.2
million at December 31, 2008 and $591.1 million at March 31, 2008. The decline
in the 2009 first quarter resulted from lower loan originations as the auto
industry experienced a significant decline in sales. It is anticipated that the
auto loan portfolio will shrink further in 2009 due to continuation of a lower
than normal level of auto sales.
As a
result of tightened underwriting, originations to borrowers with credit scores
below 660 declined from 7.9% of loans originated in the 2008 first quarter to
5.1% for the entire 2008 year and 2.8% in the 2009 first quarter. The weighted
average
borrower credit score for loans originated in those respective periods improved
from 745 to 751 and 760. Auto loans delinquent over 30 days declined from $13.1
million, or 2.20% of loans outstanding, at December 31, 2008 to $8.4 million
(1.45%) at March 31, 2009.
24
Auto loan
net charge-offs increased from $1,371,000 (or 0.93% of average loans outstanding
on an annualized basis) in the 2008 first quarter to $1,868,000 (1.27%) in the
2009 first quarter. The rate of increase was more modest in comparison to the
$1,863,000 (1.24%) of net charge-offs in the 2008 fourth quarter. The allowance
for auto loan losses increased from $5,837,000 (0.99% of loans outstanding) at
March 31, 2008 to $7,937,000 (1.33%) at December 31, 2008 and $8,169,000 (1.41%)
at March 31, 2009.
Provision
for Credit Losses
The
provision for credit losses was $2,801,000 in the 2009 first quarter compared to
$2,114,000 in the 2008 first quarter. The provision is comprised of amounts
relating to the auto loan portfolio, equipment finance and small business loans
originated by Eastern Funding LLC (“Eastern”), the remainder of the Company’s
loan portfolio and unfunded commitments.
The
provision for auto loan losses was $2,100,000 in the 2009 first quarter compared
to $1,546,000 in the 2008 first quarter. These amounts exceeded the net
charge-offs in those respective periods. See the preceding subsection, “Auto
Loans”, for a discussion of the auto loan portfolio.
The
provision for loan losses related to the Eastern loan portfolio was $351,000 in
the 2009 first quarter compared to $268,000 in the 2008 first quarter. Net
charge-offs in those periods were $287,000 and $220,000, respectively. The
annualized rate of net charge-offs equaled 0.77% in the 2009 first quarter
compared to 0.70% for the year 2008 and 0.82% for the year 2007. Eastern loans
delinquent over 30 days increased from $2,929,000 (1.99% of loans outstanding)
at December 31, 2008 to $3,286,000 (2.19%) at March 31, 2009. Eastern loans on
watch, restructured loans and non-accrual loans rose from $8,213,000 at December
31, 2008 to $8,261,000 at March 31, 2009. The allowance for Eastern loan losses
was $2,641,000 (1.76% of loans outstanding) at March 31, 2009 and $2,577,000
(1.75%) at December 31, 2008. Eastern’s typical customer is a small business
owned with limited capital resources who must rely primarily on the cash flow
from his or her business to service debt. Such borrowers are less able to cope
when economic conditions soften and, accordingly, represent higher risk
borrowers. In view of weakened economic conditions, Eastern may experience
higher loan charge-offs in the remainder of 2009.
The
remainder of the Company’s loan portfolio ($1.38 billion at March 31, 2009) is
comprised primarily of commercial and multi-family mortgage loans, residential
mortgage loans and commercial loans. This loan portfolio grew $33.9 million in
the 2009 first quarter. The provision for loan losses related to the portfolio
was $350,000 in the 2009 first quarter and $274,000 in the 2008 first quarter.
The provisions were due to loan growth as no mortgage loans or commercial loans
were charged off in those respective periods. The allowance for credit losses
related to unfunded credit commitments was increased to $1,513,000 at March 31,
2008 by a $26,000 charge to the provision for credit losses. The balance of the
allowance remained unchanged in the 2009 first quarter at
$1,183,000.
Impairment
Loss on Securities
In the
2009 first quarter, the impairment loss on securities of $726,000 resulted from
write-downs in the carrying value of perpetual preferred stock issued by the
Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
(“Merrill”) of $103,000 and $572,000, respectively, and a $51,000 write-down in
the carrying value of a trust preferred security. In the 2008 first quarter, the
impairment loss on securities of $1,249,000 resulted from write-downs in the
carrying value of perpetual preferred stock issued by FNMA ($773,000) and
Merrill ($476,000). The stocks are included in the marketable equity securities
portfolio of the Company.
The
write-downs in the carrying value of the FNMA perpetual preferred stock were
attributable to declines in the market value of the stock resulting from the
reporting of significant operating losses over the past several quarters and the
placement of FNMA under conservatorship and the control of its regulator, the
Federal Housing Finance Agency. At March 31, 2009, the carrying value of the
FNMA perpetual stock owned by the Company equaled its market value of
$32,000.
Based on
the significance of losses reported by Merrill, as well as the effect of the
collapse of Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. on the market value of brokerage firms,
the carrying value of the Merrill stock owned by the Company was written down in
the 2008 first quarter to its market value at March 31, 2008. On September 15,
2008, it was announced that Merrill would be acquired by Bank of America
Corporation (“B of A”) in an all stock transaction. The acquisition was
completed on January 1, 2009. At that time, the Merrill (now B of A) perpetual
preferred stock had an investment grade rating. Subsequent to the closing of the
acquisition, both Merrill and B of A reported losses, an agreement was entered
into whereby the U.S. Government would provide B of A with $20 billion in
additional capital and loss protection on $118 billion in toxic assets and B of
A cut its quarterly dividend on its common stock to $0.01 per share. During the
2009 first quarter, rating agencies downgraded the former Merrill perpetual
preferred stock to below investment grade. Based on all of these developments,
the carrying value of the perpetual preferred stock owned by the Company was
written-down to its market value of $360,000 at March 31, 2009.
25
See note 2
to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein and the
subsection which follows for information regarding the $51,000 write-down in a
trust preferred security included in the corporate obligations owned by the
Company at March 31, 2009.
Commentary
on Certain Other Investment Securities
Mortgage-backed
Securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (“Mortgage Debt
Securities”)
At March
31, 2009, debt securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity
amounted to $315.4 million and $159,000, respectively. Mortgage debt securities
comprised $304.6 million of the available for sale portfolio and all of the held
to maturity portfolio. All of the mortgage debt securities owned by the Company
at March 31, 2009 were rated “AAA” and were issued by U.S. Government-sponsored
enterprises. The estimated fair value of the mortgage debt securities exceeded
their amortized cost by $4.9 million at March 31, 2009.
Auction
Rate Municipal Obligations
Auction
rate municipal obligations are debt securities issued by municipal, county and
state entities that are generally repaid from revenue sources such as hospitals,
transportation systems, student education loans and property taxes. The
securities are not obligations of the issuing government entity. The obligations
are variable rate securities with long-term maturities whose interest rates are
set periodically through an auction process. The auction period typically ranges
from 7 days to 35 days. The amount invested in such obligations was $5.0 million
at March 31, 2009 compared to $5.2 million at December 31, 2008 and $13.0
million at December 31, 2007.
The
auction rate obligations owned by the Company were rated “AAA” at the time of
acquisition due, in part, to the guarantee of third party insurers who would
have to pay the obligations if the issuers failed to pay the obligations when
they become due. In the 2008 first quarter, public disclosures indicated that
certain third party insurers were experiencing financial difficulties and,
therefore, might not be able to meet their guarantee obligations if issuers
failed to pay their contractual obligations. As a result, auctions failed to
attract a sufficient number of investors and created a liquidity problem for
those investors who were relying on the obligations to be redeemed at auctions.
Since then, there has not been an active market for auction rate municipal
obligations.
Based on
an evaluation of market factors, the estimated fair value of the auction rate
municipal obligations was $4,333,000, or $667,000 less than their face value.
Full collection of the obligations is expected because the financial condition
of the issuers is sound, none of the issuers has defaulted on scheduled
payments, the obligations are rated investment grade and we have the ability and
intent to hold the obligations for a period of time to recover the unrealized
losses.
Preferred
Trust Securities (“PreTSLs”)
PreTSLs
represent an investment instrument comprised of a pool of trust preferred
securities that are debt obligations issued by a number of financial
institutions and insurance companies. The investment instrument can be
segregated into tranches (segments) that establish priority rights to cash flows
from the underlying trust preferred securities. At March 31, 2009, we owned two
preTSLs, both of which are included in corporate obligations.
The unpaid
balance of PreTSL VI was $259,000 at March 31, 2009. One of the issuers,
representing 58% of the remainder of the pool, announced in the 2009 first
quarter that it will defer regularly scheduled interest payments. Due to the
lack of an orderly market for this security, its fair value was determined to be
$155,000 at March 31, 2009 based on analytical modeling taking into
consideration a range of factors normally found in an orderly market. Of the
$104,000 unrealized loss on the security, based on an analysis of projected cash
flows, $51,000 was charged to earnings as a credit loss and included in the
impairment loss on securities in the 2009 first quarter.
The unpaid
balance of PreTSL XXVIII was $982,000 at March 31, 2009 and the estimated fair
market value was $647,000 based on factors similar to those used to value the
other PreTSL owned at that date. The unrealized loss of $335,000 was not
considered to be an other-than-temporary impairment loss because the security is
rated investment grade, we have first priority to future cash redemptions and
over 40% of the issuers would have to default before recovery of our investment
could be in doubt. Of the 47 financial institution issuers and 11 insurance
company issuers comprising the pool, no issuer represents more than 4% of the
entire pool. Only four issuers representing approximately 6% of the remaining
aggregate investment pool at March 31, 2009 were in default at that
date.
26
Other
Corporate Debt Obligations
At March
31, 2009, the aggregate carrying value of other trust preferred securities and
corporate debt obligations owned by the Company was $3,349,000 and the aggregate
market value was $1,860,000. The aggregate unrealized loss on these securities
of $1,489,000 was not considered to be an other-than-temporary impairment loss
because of the financial soundness and prospects of the issuers and our ability
and intent to hold the securities for a period of time to recover the unrealized
losses.
Other
Operating Highlights
Non-Interest Income. Fees,
charges and other income increased slightly from $994,000 in the 2008 first
quarter to $1,018,000 in the 2009 first quarter. A decline in deposit account
fees and income earned on balances held relating to outstanding checks issued by
the Bank was offset by higher loan fees.
Non-Interest Expense.
Non-interest expense in the 2009 first quarter was $417,000 (4.0%) higher than
in the 2008 first quarter. The increase resulted primarily from the addition of
a new branch, the hiring of additional personnel in the retail area, higher FDIC
insurance ($392,000), expenses relating to addressing compliance matters
outlined in a regulatory Order and higher expenses related to auto repossessions
and loan collections. Partially offsetting increased expenses was a $540,000
reduction in the expense for restricted stock awards and dividends on unvested
stock and a reduction in core deposit intangible amortization
expense.
Provision for Income Taxes.
The effective income tax rate rose from 38.9% in the 2008 first quarter to 40.7%
in the 2009 first quarter due primarily to a lower level of income emanating
from the investment security subsidiaries of the Company. Such income is subject
to a lower rate of state income tax than that imposed on bank
earnings.
Other
Financial Condition Highlights
Retail Deposits. Retail
deposits grew $108.5 million (8.2%) in the 2009 first quarter. The increase was
primarily in certificates of deposit ($68.1 million) with maturities of six
months or less and in money market savings accounts ($30.3 million). We believe
part of our deposit growth was due to the recent turmoil in financial markets
and problems experienced by some large financial institutions which prompted
certain customers to transfer their funds into financial institutions with
strong capital. When financial markets and the economy rebound, the Company may
experience some outflow of the recently gathered deposits.
Borrowed Funds. Borrowings
from the FHLB declined from $737.4 million at December 31, 2008 to $648.8
million as most of the funds obtained from deposit growth were used to pay down
borrowings.
Stockholders’ Equity.
Stockholders’ equity declined from $493.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $484.3
million as the regular quarterly dividend of $0.085 per share and the extra
dividend of $0.20 per share exceeded earnings for the 2009 first quarter and
proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
Decision
on Future Dividend Payments
As part of
its deliberation in approving the regular quarterly dividend of $0.085 per share
to be paid on May 15, 2009, the Board of Directors decided that it would
discontinue payments of semi-annual dividends of $0.20 per share, the next
payment of which would have been scheduled to occur in August 2009. Since August
2003, the Company returned excess capital to stockholders of over $143 million
through payment of semi-annual dividends which equaled $2.40 per share in the
aggregate. The Board concluded that stockholders would be better served by
preservation of capital to support growth of the Company and to take advantage
of opportunities that might arise during this period of economic uncertainty. At
March 31, 2009, the tangible capital equity ratio of the Company was
16.96%.
27
Non-Performing
Assets, Restructured Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The
following table sets forth information regarding non-performing assets,
restructured loans and the allowance for loan losses:
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Non-accrual
loans:
|
|||||||||||
Mortgage
loans:
|
|||||||||||
One-to-four
family
|
$
|
1,161
|
$
|
632
|
|||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
2,318
|
2,318
|
|||||||||
Commercial
loans - Eastern
|
3,334
|
2,641
|
|||||||||
Indirect
automobile loans
|
177
|
468
|
|||||||||
Total
non-accrual
loans
|
6,990
|
6,059
|
|||||||||
Repossessed
vehicles
|
1,171
|
1,274
|
|||||||||
Repossessed
equipment
|
846
|
762
|
|||||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
100
|
100
|
|||||||||
Total
non-performing
assets
|
$
|
9,107
|
$
|
8,195
|
|||||||
Restructured
loans
|
$
|
3,381
|
$
|
3,358
|
|||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
$
|
28,943
|
$
|
28,296
|
|||||||
Allowance
for loan losses as a percent of total loans
|
1.36
|
%
|
1.34
|
%
|
|||||||
Non-accrual
loans as a percent of total loans
|
0.33
|
%
|
0.29
|
%
|
|||||||
Non-performing
assets as a percent of total assets
|
0.35
|
%
|
0.31
|
%
|
Loans are
placed on non-accrual status either when reasonable doubt exists as to the full
timely collection of interest and principal or automatically when a loan becomes
past due 90 days. Restructured loans represent performing loans for which
concessions (such as reductions of interest rates to below market terms and/or
extension of repayment terms) were granted due to a borrower’s financial
condition. All of the restructured loans at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
were loans originated by Eastern.
In
addition to identifying non-performing loans, the Company identifies loans that
are categorized as “impaired” pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Impaired loans, which included all of the loans on non-accrual and
some restructured loans, amounted to $7,020,000 and $6,871,000 at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively. Specific reserves of $946,000 and $902,000
existed on impaired loans at those respective dates.
Non-accrual
loans at March 31, 2009 included residential mortgage loans to five borrowers
and two commercial mortgage loans to one borrower. Due to the weakening economy,
disposition of one of the commercial mortgage loans and one of the residential
mortgage loans could take some time and result in a loss. Specific reserves have
been established for the potential loss exposure on those loans. See the
subsections “Auto Loans” and “Provision for Credit Losses” appearing elsewhere
herein for information about delinquencies and net charge-offs relating to the
Eastern and auto loan portfolios.
At March
31, 2009, there were loans of $16.4 million classified Special Mention, $6.1
million classified Substandard and $1.0 million classified Doubtful. There were
specific reserves of $764,000 on such loans. At December 31, 2008, there were
loans of $14.0 million classified Special Mention, $5.6 million classified
Substandard and $1.0 million classified Doubtful. There were specific reserves
of $902,000 on such loans. The increase in loans classified Special Mention is
attributable to a $3.9 million construction loan encountering slowness of unit
sales. The loan is supported by a strong guarantor. Deterioration in local
economic conditions could cause some of the Company’s borrowers to experience
difficulty in meeting their loan obligations, resulting in a higher level of
non-performing loans in the future.
Non-performing
assets include other real estate owned resulting from foreclosures of properties
securing mortgage loans or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure,
repossessed vehicles resulting from non-payment of amounts due on auto loans and
repossessed equipment resulting from non-payment of amounts due on Eastern
loans. Other real estate owned and repossessed vehicles and equipment are
recorded at estimated fair value less costs to sell.
The
reduction in repossessed vehicles resulted from auction sales. Repossessed
equipment increased as a result of more Eastern borrowers not making their loan
payments. The inventory of repossessed vehicles and equipment could rise if the
economy continues to weaken and auto and Eastern borrowers experience further
difficulties in meeting their loan payment obligations.
28
Asset/Liability
Management
The
Company’s Asset/Liability Committee is responsible for managing interest rate
risk and reviewing with the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis its
activities and strategies, the effect of those strategies on the Company’s
operating results, the Company’s interest rate risk position and the effect
changes in interest rates would have on the Company’s net interest
income.
Generally,
it is the Company’s policy to reasonably match the rate sensitivity of its
assets and liabilities. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the
difference between the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing
within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities
maturing or repricing within the same time period.
At March
31, 2009, interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year amounted
to $1.046 billion and interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within
one year amounted to $1.442 billion, resulting in a cumulative one year negative
gap position of $396 million, or 15.1% of total assets. At December 31, 2008,
the Company had a negative one year cumulative gap position of $336 million, or
12.9% of total assets. The change in the cumulative one year gap position from
the end of 2008 resulted primarily from a $107 million increase in short-term
retail certificates of deposit outstanding at March 31, 2009 compared to
December 31, 2008.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments
on loans and debt securities and borrowings from the FHLB. While maturities and
scheduled amortization of loans and investments are predictable sources of
funds, deposit flows and mortgage loan prepayments are greatly influenced by
interest rate trends, economic conditions and competition.
Based on
its monitoring of deposit trends and its current pricing strategy for deposits,
management believes the Company will retain a large portion of its existing
deposit base. Growth during the remainder of 2009 will depend on several
factors, including the interest rate environment and competitor
pricing.
The
Company utilizes advances from the FHLB to fund growth and to manage part of the
interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities. Total advances
outstanding at March 31, 2009 amounted to $648.8 million and the Company had the
capacity to increase that amount to $916.7 million.
The
Company’s most liquid assets are cash and due from banks, short-term investments
and debt securities that generally mature within 90 days. At March 31, 2009,
such assets amounted to $92.3 million, or 3.5% of total assets.
At March
31, 2009, Brookline Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. The
Bank’s Tier I capital was $412.8 million, or 16.2% of adjusted assets. The
minimum required Tier I capital ratio is 4.00%.
Regulatory
Order
As
reported in a Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 20, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, the Bank and Eastern
stipulated and consented to a Cease and Desist Order (the “Order”) issued by the
Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”) which became effective February 20,
2009. The Order was issued as a result of findings identified in the course of a
regular examination of the Bank relating to non-compliance by Eastern and the
indirect auto lending department of the Bank with certain laws and regulations,
including the Bank Secrecy Act, Anti-Money Laundering and Office of Foreign
Control Compliance Programs. The Bank has responded to the OTS indicating the
actions taken to address the matters specified in the Order.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risks
For a
discussion of the Company’s management of market risk exposure and quantitative
information about market risk, see pages 17 through 19 of the Company’s Annual
Report incorporated by reference in Part II item 7A of Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including
its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the Company has
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon
that evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer
concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to insure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
29
There has
been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
identified in connection with the quarterly evaluation that occurred during the
Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Part II - Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On
February 21, 2007, Carrie E. Mosca (“Plaintiff”) filed a putative class action
complaint against Brookline Bank in the Superior Court for the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts (the “Action”). Ms. Mosca defaulted on a loan obligation on an
automobile that she co-owned. She alleged that the form of notice of sale of
collateral that the Bank sent to her after she and the co-owner became
delinquent on the loan obligation did not contain information required to be
provided to a consumer under the Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code. The
Action purported to be brought on behalf of a class of individuals to whom the
Bank sent the same form of notice of sale of collateral during the four year
period prior to the filing of the Action. The Action sought statutory damages,
an order restraining the Bank from future use of the form of notice sent to Ms.
Mosca, an order barring the Bank from recovering any deficiency from other
individuals to whom it sent the same form of notice, attorneys’ fees, litigation
expenses and costs. The Bank answered, denying liability and opposing
Plaintiff’s motion to certify a class. The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for
class certification in an order dated July 18, 2008. On July 31, 2008, Plaintiff
served a motion for summary judgment seeking an award of damages in the amount
of $2,928 to her individually. The Bank opposed that motion and moved for
summary judgment in its favor. On January 26, 2009, the Court denied Plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of the Bank.
On February 23, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal.
In
addition to the above matter, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in
litigation that is considered incidental to the business of the Company.
Management believes the results of such litigation will be immaterial to the
consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the
Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have
been no material changes from the risk factors presented in the Company’s Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on February 27,
2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
a) Not applicable.
b) Not applicable.
c) The
following table presents a summary of the Company’s share repurchases during the
quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Period
|
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price
Paid
Per
Share
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part
of Publicly
Announced
Program (1) (2)
(3)
|
Maximum
Number
of
Shares
that May
Yet
be
Purchased
Under
the
Program (1) (2)
(3)
|
|||
January
1 through March 31, 2009
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
2,195,590
|
4,804,410
|
(1) | On April 19, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a program to repurchase 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Prior to January 1, 2009, 2,195,590 shares authorized under this program had been repurchased. At March 31, 2009, 304,410 shares authorized under this program remained available for repurchase. |
(2) |
On
July 19, 2007, the Board of Directors approved another program to
repurchase an additional 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
At March 31, 2009, all of the 2,000,000 shares authorized under this
program remained available for repurchase.
|
(3) |
On
January 17, 2008, the Board of Directors approved another program to
repurchase an additional 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
At March 31, 2009, all of the 2,500,000 shares authorized under this
program remained available for
repurchase.
|
30
The Board
of Directors has delegated to the discretion of the Company’s senior management
the authority to determine the timing of the repurchases and the prices at which
the repurchases will be made.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not
applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
Not
applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
Exhibit
11
|
Statement
Regarding Computation of Per Share
Earnings
|
Exhibit
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer
|
Exhibit
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
|
Exhibit
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
Exhibit
32.2
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
31
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
BROOKLINE
BANCORP, INC.
Date: May
5, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Paul A. Perrault
|
|
Paul
A. Perrault
|
|||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
Date: May
5, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Paul R. Bechet
|
|
Paul
R. Bechet
|
|||
Senior
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer
|
32