BROWN FORMAN CORP - Annual Report: 2022 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One) | |||||
☑ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2022
OR
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-00123
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 61-0143150 | |||||||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |||||||
850 Dixie Highway | ||||||||
Louisville, | Kentucky | 40210 | ||||||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (502) 585-1100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||
Class A Common Stock (voting), $0.15 par value | BFA | New York Stock Exchange | ||||||
Class B Common Stock (nonvoting), $0.15 par value | BFB | New York Stock Exchange | ||||||
1.200% Notes due 2026 | BF26 | New York Stock Exchange | ||||||
2.600% Notes due 2028 | BF28 | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ☑ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||||||||||
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | |||||||||||
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
The aggregate market value, as of the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter, of the voting and nonvoting equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $23,100,000,000.
The number of shares outstanding for each of the registrant’s classes of Common Stock on May 31, 2022, was:
Class A Common Stock (voting), $0.15 par value | 169,175,352 | ||||
Class B Common Stock (nonvoting), $0.15 par value | 309,878,389 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement of Registrant for use in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held July 28, 2022, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
Table of Contents | ||||||||
Page | ||||||||
PART I | ||||||||
Item 1. | ||||||||
Item 1A. | ||||||||
Item 1B. | ||||||||
Item 2. | ||||||||
Item 3. | ||||||||
Item 4. | ||||||||
PART II | ||||||||
Item 5. | ||||||||
Item 6. | ||||||||
Item 7. | ||||||||
Item 7A. | ||||||||
Item 8. | ||||||||
Item 9. | ||||||||
Item 9A. | ||||||||
Item 9B. | ||||||||
Item 9C. | ||||||||
PART III | ||||||||
Item 10. | ||||||||
Item 11. | ||||||||
Item 12. | ||||||||
Item 13. | ||||||||
Item 14. | ||||||||
PART IV | ||||||||
Item 15. | ||||||||
Item 16. | ||||||||
2
Forward-Looking Statement Information. Certain matters discussed in this report, including the information presented in Part II under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contain statements, estimates, and projections that are “forward-looking statements” as defined under U.S. federal securities laws. Words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “aspire,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “envision,” “estimate,” “expect,” “expectation,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “pursue,” “see,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar words indicate forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date we make them. Except as required by law, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors (many beyond our control) that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience or from our current expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including:
•Our substantial dependence upon the continued growth of the Jack Daniel's family of brands
•Substantial competition from new entrants, consolidations by competitors and retailers, and other competitive activities, such as pricing actions (including price reductions, promotions, discounting, couponing, or free goods), marketing, category expansion, product introductions, or entry or expansion in our geographic markets or distribution networks
•Route-to-consumer changes that affect the timing of our sales, temporarily disrupt the marketing or sale of our products, or result in higher fixed costs
•Disruption of our distribution network or inventory fluctuations in our products by distributors, wholesalers, or retailers
•Changes in consumer preferences, consumption, or purchase patterns – particularly away from larger producers in favor of small distilleries or local producers, or away from brown spirits, our premium products, or spirits generally, and our ability to anticipate or react to them; further legalization of marijuana; shifts in consumer purchase practices; bar, restaurant, travel, or other on-premise declines; shifts in demographic or health and wellness trends; or unfavorable consumer reaction to new products, line extensions, package changes, product reformulations, or other product innovation
•Production facility, aging warehouse, or supply chain disruption
•Imprecision in supply/demand forecasting
•Higher costs, lower quality, or unavailability of energy, water, raw materials, product ingredients, or labor
•Impact of health epidemics and pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and the risk of the resulting negative economic impacts and related governmental actions
•Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions, particularly related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and related economic slowdowns or recessions, low consumer confidence, high unemployment, weak credit or capital markets, budget deficits, burdensome government debt, austerity measures, higher interest rates, higher taxes, political instability, higher inflation, deflation, lower returns on pension assets, or lower discount rates for pension obligations
•Product recalls or other product liability claims, product tampering, contamination, or quality issues
•Negative publicity related to our company, products, brands, marketing, executive leadership, employees, Board of Directors, family stockholders, operations, business performance, or prospects
•Failure to attract or retain key executive or employee talent
•Risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions, business partnerships, or investments – such as acquisition integration, termination difficulties or costs, or impairment in recorded value
•Risks associated with being a U.S.-based company with a global business, including commercial, political, and financial risks; local labor policies and conditions; protectionist trade policies, or economic or trade sanctions, including additional retaliatory tariffs on American whiskeys and the effectiveness of our actions to mitigate the negative impact on our margins, sales, and distributors; compliance with local trade practices and other regulations; terrorism; and health pandemics
•Failure to comply with anti-corruption laws, trade sanctions and restrictions, or similar laws or regulations
•Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly a stronger U.S. dollar
•Changes in laws, regulatory measures, or governmental policies – especially those that affect the production, importation, marketing, labeling, pricing, distribution, sale, or consumption of our beverage alcohol products
•Tax rate changes (including excise, corporate, sales or value-added taxes, property taxes, payroll taxes, import and export duties, and tariffs) or changes in related reserves, changes in tax rules or accounting standards, and the unpredictability and suddenness with which they can occur
•Decline in the social acceptability of beverage alcohol in significant markets
•Significant additional labeling or warning requirements or limitations on availability of our beverage alcohol products
•Counterfeiting and inadequate protection of our intellectual property rights
•Significant legal disputes and proceedings, or government investigations
•Cyber breach or failure or corruption of our key information technology systems or those of our suppliers, customers, or direct and indirect business partners, or failure to comply with personal data protection laws
•Our status as a family “controlled company” under New York Stock Exchange rules, and our dual-class share structure
3
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information. Certain matters discussed in this report, including the information presented in Part II under “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” include measures that are not measures of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for any measure derived in accordance with GAAP, and also may be inconsistent with similarly titled measures presented by other companies. In Part II under “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” we present the reasons we use these measures under the heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” and we reconcile these measures to the most closely comparable GAAP measures under the heading “Results of Operations.”
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
Brown-Forman Corporation (the “Company,” “Brown-Forman,” “we,” “us,” or “our” below) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1933, successor to a business founded in 1870 as a partnership and later incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Kentucky in 1901. We primarily manufacture, distill, bottle, import, export, market, and sell a wide variety of beverage alcohol products under recognized brands. We employ approximately 5,200 people (excluding individuals that work on a part-time or temporary basis) on six continents, including approximately 2,600 people in the United States (approximately 15% of whom are represented by a union) and 1,200 people in Louisville, Kentucky, USA, home of our world headquarters. According to International Wine & Spirit Research (IWSR), we are the largest American-owned spirits and wine company with global reach. We are a “controlled company” under New York Stock Exchange rules because the Brown family owns more than 50% of our voting stock. Taking into account ownership of shares of our non-voting stock, the Brown family also controls more than 50% of the economic ownership in Brown-Forman.
For a discussion of recent developments, see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Executive Summary.”
4
Brands
Beginning in 1870 with Old Forester Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whisky – our founding brand – and spanning the generations since, we have built a portfolio of more than 40 spirit, ready-to-drink (RTD) cocktail, and wine brands that includes some of the best-known and most loved trademarks in our industry. The most important and iconic brand in our portfolio is Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey, the #1 selling American whiskey in the world1. Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey was recently named the most valuable spirits brand in the world in the 2021 Interbrand “Best Global Brands” rankings. Our premium bourbons, Woodford Reserve and Old Forester, were once again selected for the Impact “Hot Brands”2 list, marking nine and four consecutive years on the list, respectively. Our tequilas, el Jimador and Herradura, were also named to the “Hot Brands”2 list.
Principal Brands | ||||||||
Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey | el Jimador Tequilas5 | |||||||
Jack Daniel's RTD3 | el Jimador New Mix RTD | |||||||
Jack Daniel's Tennessee Honey | Korbel California Champagnes6 | |||||||
Gentleman Jack Rare Tennessee Whiskey | Korbel California Brandy6 | |||||||
Jack Daniel's Tennessee Fire | Herradura Tequilas7 | |||||||
Jack Daniel's Tennessee Apple | Finlandia Vodkas | |||||||
Jack Daniel's Single Barrel Collection4 | Sonoma-Cutrer California Wines | |||||||
Jack Daniel's Tennessee Rye | Old Forester Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whisky | |||||||
Jack Daniel's Winter Jack | Old Forester Whiskey Row Series | |||||||
Jack Daniel's Sinatra Select | Old Forester Kentucky Straight Rye Whisky | |||||||
Jack Daniel’s Bonded | GlenDronach Single Malt Scotch Whisky | |||||||
Jack Daniel's No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey | Benriach Single Malt Scotch Whisky | |||||||
Jack Daniel's Bottled-in-Bond | Glenglassaugh Single Malt Scotch Whisky | |||||||
Jack Daniel’s 10 Year Old | Chambord Liqueur | |||||||
Jack Daniel’s Triple Mash | Slane Irish Whiskey | |||||||
Woodford Reserve Kentucky Bourbon | Fords Gin | |||||||
Woodford Reserve Double Oaked | Coopers' Craft Kentucky Bourbon | |||||||
Woodford Reserve Kentucky Rye Whiskey | Part Time Rangers RTDs | |||||||
Woodford Reserve Kentucky Straight Malt Whiskey | ||||||||
Woodford Reserve Kentucky Straight Wheat Whiskey |
1IWSR, 2022. | |||||
2Impact Databank, March 2022. | |||||
3Jack Daniel's RTD includes Jack Daniel's & Cola, Jack Daniel's Country Cocktails, Jack Daniel's Double Jack, and other malt- and spirit-based Jack Daniel’s RTDs. | |||||
4The Jack Daniel's Single Barrel Collection includes Jack Daniel's Single Barrel Select, Jack Daniel's Single Barrel Barrel Proof, Jack Daniel's Single Barrel Rye, and Jack Daniel's Single Barrel 100 Proof. | |||||
5el Jimador Tequilas comprise all full-strength expressions of el Jimador. | |||||
6Korbel is not an owned brand. We sell Korbel products under contract in the United States and other select markets. | |||||
7Herradura Tequilas comprise all expressions of Herradura. |
See “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Fiscal 2022 Brand Highlights” for brand performance details.
Our vision in marketing is to be the best brand-builder in the industry. We build our brands by investing in platforms that we believe create enduring connections with our consumers. These platforms cover a wide spectrum of activities, including media advertising (TV, radio, print, outdoor, digital, and social), consumer and trade promotions, sponsorships, and visitors' center programs at our distilleries and our winery. We expect to grow our sales and profits by consistently delivering creative, responsible marketing programs that drive brand recognition, brand trial, brand loyalty, and ultimately, consumer demand around the world.
5
Markets
We sell our products in over 170 countries around the world. The United States, our most important market, accounted for 49% of our net sales in fiscal 2022 and the other 51% were outside of the United States. The table below shows the percentage of total net sales for our largest markets in our three most recent fiscal years:
Percentage of Total Net Sales by Geographic Area | |||||||||||
Year ended April 30 | |||||||||||
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||
United States | 50 | % | 50 | % | 49 | % | |||||
Germany | 5 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | |||||
Australia | 5 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | |||||
United Kingdom | 5 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | |||||
Mexico | 5 | % | 4 | % | 5 | % | |||||
Other | 30 | % | 28 | % | 28 | % | |||||
TOTAL | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding |
For details about net sales in our largest markets, see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Fiscal 2022 Market Highlights.” For details about our reportable segment and for additional geographic information about net sales and long-lived assets, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” For details on risks related to our global operations, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Distribution Network and Customers
Our distribution network, or our “route to consumer” (RTC), varies depending on (a) the laws and regulatory framework for trade in beverage alcohol by market, (b) our assessment of a market's long-term attractiveness and competitive dynamics, (c) the relative profitability of distribution options available to us, (d) the structure of the retail and wholesale trade in a market, and (e) our portfolio's development stage in a market. As these factors change, we evaluate our RTC strategy and, from time to time, adapt our model.
In the United States, which generally prohibits spirits and wine manufacturers from selling their products directly to consumers, we sell our brands either to distributors or to state governments (in states that directly control alcohol sales) that then sell to retail customers and consumers.
Outside the United States, we use a variety of RTC models, which can be grouped into three categories: owned distribution, partner, and government-controlled markets. We own and operate distribution companies for Australia, Belgium and Luxembourg, Brazil, Czechia, France, Germany, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. In these owned-distribution markets, and in a large portion of the Travel Retail channel, we sell our products directly to retailers or wholesalers. In many other markets, including Italy, Japan, and South Africa, we rely on third parties to distribute our brands, generally under fixed-term distribution contracts. In Canada, we sell our products to provincial governments.
We believe that our customer relationships are good and our exposure to concentrations of credit risk is limited due to the diverse geographic areas covered by our operations and our thorough evaluation of each customer. In fiscal 2022, our two largest customers accounted for approximately 14% and 12% of consolidated net sales, respectively. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2022.
Seasonality
Holiday buying makes the fourth calendar quarter the peak season for our business. Approximately 30% of our reported net sales for fiscal 2020, fiscal 2021, and fiscal 2022 were in the fourth calendar quarter of each year.
6
Competition
Trade information indicates that we are one of the largest global suppliers of premium spirits. According to IWSR, for calendar year 2021, the ten largest global spirits companies controlled approximately 20% of the total spirits volume sold around the world. While we believe that the overall market environment offers considerable growth opportunities for us, our industry is, and will remain, highly competitive. We compete against many global, regional, and local brands in a variety of categories of beverage alcohol, but our brands compete primarily in the industry's premium-and-above price points. Our competitors include major global spirits and wine companies, such as Bacardi Limited, Beam Suntory Inc., Becle S.A.B. de C.V., Davide Campari-Milano N.V., Diageo PLC, LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, Pernod Ricard SA, and Rémy Cointreau. In addition, particularly in the United States, we compete with national companies and craft spirit brands, many of which entered the market in the last few years.
Brand recognition, brand provenance, quality of product and packaging, availability, flavor profile, and price affect consumers' choices among competing brands in our industry. Other factors also influence consumers, including advertising, promotions, merchandising at the point of sale, expert or celebrity endorsement, social media and word of mouth, and the timing and relevance of new product introductions. Although some competitors have substantially greater resources than we do, we believe that our competitive position is strong, particularly as it relates to brand awareness, quality, availability, and relevance of new product introductions.
Ingredients and Other Supplies
The principal raw materials used in manufacturing and packaging our distilled spirits, liqueurs, RTD products, and wines are shown in the table below.
Principal Raw Materials | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distilled Spirits | Liqueurs | RTD Products | Wines | Packaging | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Agave | Flavorings | Flavorings | Grapes | Aluminum cans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Barley | Neutral spirits | Malt | Wood | Cartons | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Corn | Sugar | Neutral spirits | Closures | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Malted barley | Water | Sugar | Glass bottles | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rye | Whiskey | Tequila | Labels | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sugar | Wine | Water | PET1 bottles | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Water | Whiskey | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wood |
1Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is a polymer used in non-glass containers. |
We are currently managing through a variety of global supply chain disruptions, largely related to glass supply, and have deployed a number of risk mitigation strategies to address the various constraints on our business. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for more information on the effect of supply chain disruptions on our results.
From time to time, our agricultural ingredients (agave, barley, corn, grapes, malted barley, rye, and wood) could be adversely affected by weather and other forces out of our control that might constrain supply or reduce our inventory below desired levels for optimum production.
Whiskeys and certain tequilas and other distilled spirits must be aged. Because we must produce these distilled spirits years in advance to meet projected future demand, our inventories of these products may be larger in relation to sales and total assets than in many other businesses.
For details on risks related to the unavailability of raw materials and the inherent uncertainty in forecasting supply and demand, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property includes trademarks, copyrights, proprietary packaging and trade dress, proprietary manufacturing technologies, know-how, and patents. Our intellectual property, especially our trademarks, is essential to our business. We register our trademarks broadly around the world, focusing primarily on where we sell or expect to sell our products. We protect our intellectual property rights vigorously but fairly. We have licensed some of our trademarks to third parties for use with services or on products other than alcoholic beverages, which enhances the awareness and protection of our brands. Depending on the jurisdiction, trademarks are valid as long as they are in use and/or their registrations are properly maintained. We also have various licenses and distribution agreements for the production, sale, and marketing of our products,
7
and for the sale and marketing of products of others. These licenses and distribution agreements have varying terms and durations.
For details on risks related to the protection of our intellectual property, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” For details on our most important brands, see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Fiscal 2022 Brand Highlights.”
Regulatory Environment
Federal, state, local, and foreign authorities regulate how we produce, store, transport, distribute, market, and sell our products. Some countries and local jurisdictions prohibit or restrict the marketing or sale of distilled spirits in whole or in part.
In the United States, at the federal level, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury regulates the spirits and wine industry with respect to the production, blending, bottling, labeling, advertising, sales, and transportation of beverage alcohol. Similar regulatory regimes exist at the state level and in most non-U.S. jurisdictions where we sell our products. In addition, beverage alcohol products are subject to customs duties, excise taxes, and/or sales taxes in many countries, including taxation at the federal, state, and local level in the United States.
Many countries set their own distilling and maturation requirements; for example, under U.S. federal and state regulations, bourbon and Tennessee whiskeys must be aged in new, charred oak barrels; we typically age our whiskeys at least three years. Mexican authorities regulate the production and bottling of tequilas; they mandate minimum aging periods for extra añejo (three years), añejo (one year), and reposado (two months). Irish whiskey must be matured at least three years in a wood cask, such as oak, on the island of Ireland. Scotch whisky must be matured in oak casks for at least three years in Scotland. We comply with all of the applicable laws and regulations.
Our operations are subject to various environmental protection statutes and regulations, and our policy is to comply with them.
8
Integrated Strategy and Performance
![bfb-20220430_g1.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000014693/000001469322000069/bfb-20220430_g1.jpg)
For more than 150 years, Brown-Forman and the Brown family have been committed to driving sustainable growth and preserving Brown-Forman as a thriving, family-controlled, independent company. The image on the left illustrates our core purpose, “Enriching Life,” and our highest ambition, “Nothing Better in the Market,” surrounded by the values that have guided us for decades: integrity, respect, trust, teamwork, and excellence. In addition to these guiding principles, our success depends on several strategic priorities, as illustrated in the image on the right: the quality of our brands within our portfolio, our geographic reach, the talent and diversity of our people, and the return on our investments. Moreover, taking an integrated approach means that many aspects of our company contribute to this value creation and are fundamental to our strategy, including our commitment to environmental sustainability, alcohol and marketing responsibility, diversity and inclusion, and to building communities in which we live and work.
We faced a challenging and volatile environment, including supply chain disruptions and the ongoing pandemic, over the past two fiscal years. Our employees' unique mix of agility, resilience, energy, and collaboration enabled us to succeed despite these challenges, and we believe will continue to strengthen us over time. Our values drove decisions throughout this year, and our core purpose of “Enriching Life” and our highest ambition of “Nothing Better in the Market” continue to guide us as we move forward to a reimagined future with a renewed sense of opportunity for what lies ahead. We believe that several recent headwinds are becoming tailwinds. For example, after more than three years, tariffs on American whiskey in the European Union were removed on January 1, 2022, and tariffs in the United Kingdom were removed on June 1, 2022.
This Integrated Annual Report presents not only our financial performance but also our environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) strategies, commitments, and results. It provides a more holistic view of Brown-Forman, our culture, our strategic approach to our business, and how we achieve results.
Portfolio and Responsibility
We seek to build brands and create shareholder value responsibly by delivering strong and sustainable growth, solid margins, and high returns on invested capital. We focus on building brands that can be meaningful for our company and our consumers over the longer term. We aim to grow our premium spirits portfolio both organically and through innovation. Opportunistically and thoughtfully, we also consider acquisitions and partnerships that will enhance our capacity to deliver meaningful growth, improve margins, and increase shareholder returns.
We strive to grow our brands and enhance consumers' experience with them. Even as we do so, we remain committed to marketing our brands responsibly and promoting responsible drinking. Regulation of our industry is not new, and external interest from the World Health Organization and other health bodies has grown over time. We uphold high standards of self-regulation by adhering to industry guidelines on responsible marketing and advertising. We work both independently and with industry organizations to promote alcohol responsibility, such as the International Alliance for Responsible Drinking, the Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility (responsibility.org) in the United States, The Portman Group in the United Kingdom, DrinkWise in Australia, and FISAC in Mexico.
9
The Jack Daniel's family of brands, led by Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey (JDTW), is our most valuable asset – the engine of our overall financial performance and the foundation of our leadership position in the American whiskey category1. We strive to strengthen the brand's leadership position, and will steadfastly work to keep JDTW relevant to consumers worldwide, while pursuing the opportunities to grow the Jack Daniel's family of brands across markets, premium-and-above price points, channels, and consumer groups. Product innovation continues to contribute meaningfully to our performance. Different Jack Daniel's expressions have brought new consumers to the franchise, including Honey (2011), Fire (2015), Rye (2017), Apple (2019), and our most recent launch, Jack Daniel's 10 Year Old Tennessee Whiskey (2021), which individually and collectively add great value to the company and to our consumers the world over.
In addition to the leadership of our Jack Daniel's family of brands, we expect strong worldwide growth from our other whiskey brands, particularly Woodford Reserve and Old Forester. Woodford Reserve is the leading super-premium American whiskey globally1, growing volumes at a strong double-digit compound annual growth rate since the brand was introduced 25 years ago. Woodford Reserve surpassed 1.4 million nine-liter cases of annual volume as of April 30, 2022. We believe the brand is poised for continued growth as the bourbon category continues to grow around the world. Old Forester has continued its return to prominence in the United States and in select international markets. Innovation has played an important role in the premiumization of both of these brands, including the success of high-end expressions such as Woodford Reserve Double Oaked and the Old Forester Whiskey Row Series.
Outside of our American whiskey brands, we believe our portfolio remains well positioned in other high-growth categories with meaningful premium brands and a focus on accelerating our super-premium portfolio. Our tequila portfolio is led by two brands steeped in Mexican heritage, Herradura and el Jimador. Despite the cyclical cost pressures resulting from the unprecedented cost of agave, we remain pleased with the growth of our tequila business in the United States and the long-term growth prospects of this business globally. We believe that our Scotch whiskies GlenDronach, Benriach, and Glenglassaugh, and our Irish whiskey Slane, are well-positioned in their respective categories. We expect them all to become meaningful contributors over the longer term. Lastly, we believe our acquisition of Fords Gin in the summer of 2019 provides access to the premium gin category, particularly in the United States, and we look to grow this brand in key gin markets globally.
Fiscal 2022 was another year of growth for our ready-to-drink (RTD) portfolio. Jack Daniel's RTDs are approaching 14 million nine-liter cases globally. In Mexico, our el Jimador tequila-based RTD, New Mix, sold approximately 8 million nine-liter cases. In calendar 2020 we introduced Jack Daniel's Can Cocktails in the United States and also announced a new partnership with Pabst Brewing Company for the supply, sales, and distribution of Jack Daniel's Country Cocktails in this important market. In December 2020, we acquired Part Time Rangers, a line of low-calorie, spirit-based RTDs with natural fruit flavorings. Part Time Rangers is based in New Zealand, and we believe it will help us grow our RTD portfolio in that country, Australia, and potentially beyond.
We appreciate the power of our brands to enrich the experience of life, and we believe it is our duty to ensure that our products are marketed and enjoyed with deep respect for our consumers. Our mission for alcohol responsibility is to empower mindful choices around beverage alcohol. We launched the Pause campaign in 2019. Pause is Brown-Forman’s driving effort to encourage mindful choices. The campaign began by raising awareness and inspiring action from our colleagues and business partners around the importance of alcohol responsibility.
Geography
The United States remains our largest market, and continued growth there is important to our long-term success. We expect to foster this growth by emphasizing fast-growing spirits categories, continued product and packaging innovation, and brand building within growing consumer segments. This includes increasing emphasis on inclusive, digital, and integrated marketing and the growth of our e-commerce capabilities to better connect and engage with consumers where they are.
Outside the United States, we continue to increase our competitiveness through improved routes to consumers. In 2022, we established our owned-distribution organizations for Belgium & Luxembourg and Taiwan. More direct connection with customers and consumers enabled through owned distribution is an important part of our strategic growth.
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our global markets differently. While the recovery has been varied by geography, we expect increasing contributions to our long-term future growth from emerging markets, including Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Poland, and Southeast Asia.
1 IWSR 2022
10
People, Diversity & Inclusion, and Ethics & Compliance
As we work to increase our brands' relevance and appeal to diverse consumer groups around the world, we believe a diversity of experiences and mindsets within our own workforce is essential. In the summer of 2019, we unveiled Many Spirits, One Brown-Forman: Gender and Race Edition, our 2030 Diversity & Inclusion Strategy aimed at creating a foundation from which to build a more diverse workforce and inclusive culture. In the summer of 2020, we developed and published commitments to be better and do better – to live our value of respect, educate ourselves more fully on what it means to be anti-racist, identify and eliminate barriers to inclusion, create an environment where all employees can bring their best selves to work, and extend our commitment more deeply in our communities, especially our hometown of Louisville, Kentucky. We believe these actions will help us continue to build an inclusive culture at Brown-Forman.
Our vision is to create an environment where leveraging diversity and inclusion occurs naturally, giving us a sustainable marketplace advantage. We have set race and gender ambitions to have at least 50% women in professional- and leader-level roles globally, 40% women in senior leadership positions globally, and 25% people of color in our United States workforce by 2030. We have also set a goal to reach 16% of our supplier spend in locations such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, with businesses that are woman- or minority-owned by 2030. For more than a decade, we have earned a perfect score in the Corporate Equality Index, a national benchmarking survey and report on corporate policies and practices related to LGBTQ workplace equality administered by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation.
One of the main drivers of Brown-Forman’s inclusive culture is the continued growth and leadership of our 10 Employee Resource Groups (ERGs). We believe ERGs are instrumental in enriching our company's culture, and our employees experience this by supporting development and engagement of our diverse workforce, driving cultural awareness and competency across the organization, and enabling authentic engagement with our consumers. Our ERGs also create spaces for our employees and their allies to connect with, support, and advocate for one another.
Our core values of integrity, respect, trust, teamwork, and excellence form the foundation of our ethics and compliance program. “Values Drive Decisions” is the key theme of this program, and we use it to teach our employees to rely on our values when faced with a difficult decision and to “speak up” if they believe they, a colleague, or a business partner may have violated the law, our Code of Conduct, or company policy. In 44 countries, we offer a third-party service to employees and others who choose to “speak up” anonymously. We deliver training to Managers reinforcing our commitment to non-retaliation and maintaining a “Speak-Up” culture.
We convey our compliance expectations to employees via our Code of Conduct, and all employees certify annually that they will comply with the Code of Conduct and report a potential violation. The Code of Conduct is a toolkit for employees, as it details expectations for 18 different risks, includes links to Q&A, policies, training and the ability to contact a subject-matter expert. Our Code of Conduct and certification is refreshed annually and is available in 13 languages.
Investment and Sustainability
One thing we have learned over more than a century and a half is that long-term success requires investment and a mindset of sustainability. We understand the need to invest in our brands, global supply chain facilities, homeplace and visitor centers, and aging inventory. For example, in fiscal 2021, our Board of Directors approved a $125 million capital investment to expand our bourbon-making capacity in Kentucky to meet anticipated future consumer demand. Additionally, in fiscal 2022 our Board of Directors approved a $50 million capital investment to expand our scotch-making capacity to meet anticipated future demand. We also understand the importance of investing in our people, communities, and the environment. We recognize that climate change is a business issue with risks and opportunities. As such, we are committed to actions that will ensure the long-term health of the planet and our business. In fiscal 2021, we established a new 2030 Sustainability Strategy to align our efforts with industry best practices and the most current climate science. Our new goals broaden our focus beyond business operations to include our supply chain, where the majority of our environmental footprint resides. With this new strategy, we have a roadmap for continued progress over the next quarter-century.
11
![bfb-20220430_g2.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000014693/000001469322000069/bfb-20220430_g2.jpg)
Our recent investments in renewable energy and resource stewardship underscore our long-term focus:
•Wind: Our partnership with the East Fork Wind project, which became operational in April 2020, provides a renewable energy source that offsets more than 90% of our electricity usage in the United States.
•Solar: Last year, Jack Daniel's announced a partnership to provide our Lynchburg distillery with 20 megawatts of solar energy. The agreement will provide nearly three-quarters of the distillery's electricity needs, and makes Jack Daniel's the first distillery to participate in Tennessee Valley Authority's Green Invest Program.
•Watersheds: To manage water risk, we have completed watershed risk assessments to evaluate watersheds we operate in that are considered at-risk or business critical. Following the assessments, we have begun to develop multi-year mitigation plans to address risk.
•Waste: In 2020, we were pleased to achieve our zero-waste-to-landfill (defined as sending less than 1% to landfill) goal across our production facilities. Our next priority is to integrate circular economy principles into our business that will allow us to go beyond zero-waste to a regenerative approach where resources are continually reused.
We believe we are better positioned than ever to deliver exceptional high-quality products to our consumers around the world. We have a highly capable and engaged workforce. We have developed brand-building capabilities by equipping our teams with the training and tools necessary for an increasingly data-driven digital global marketplace. Among other trends, the expansion of the digital economy accelerated significantly as consumers, businesses, and communities adapted to the challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. To continue our success in how we market and sell our brands, we announced in fiscal 2021 an investment in a new Integrated Marketing Communications organization that we believe will further enhance our ability to win in the digital economy.
Community
In addition to the investments we make in our employees, we believe it is vital that we give back to the communities that support both our employees and our company by thoughtfully deploying our time, talent, and resources. We have been a proud corporate citizen of our hometown of Louisville, Kentucky, since we were founded. Being a good neighbor is something we strive for wherever we operate, and our expanded focus and commitment to the neighborhood around our corporate campus meets this call to be the best neighbor we can be in an area that has experienced the effects of underinvestment and systemic racism.
We also continue to expand our civic engagement into Brown-Forman global office locations, allowing those employees closest to the needs of their communities to decide how to invest their charitable-giving resources. We leverage our key community relations partners to stay informed of collaborative opportunities in the communities where we work and live, and to shape our charitable-giving strategy to meet the essential needs of the communities that sustain us. We provide charitable donations and our employees volunteer throughout our communities, including 128 serving on 230 nonprofit boards in the United States. The Brown-Forman Foundation (the Foundation) was created in fiscal 2018 with the goal of helping fund our ongoing philanthropic endeavors. The Foundation's earnings provide a consistent source of revenue for charitable giving
12
independent of our annual earnings. We work to partner with organizations that support our key focus areas: empowering responsible and sustainable living, ensuring essential living standards, and enhancing arts and cultural living. As part of our commitment to be better and do better as neighbors and as corporate citizens, the Brown-Forman Foundation made a 10-year, $50 million commitment to five organizations in west Louisville in 2022, which is the largest investment in its history. Our partner organizations include AMPED, the Louisville Central Community Center, the Louisville Urban League, Simmons College of Kentucky, and the West End School. Together, these organizations will advance educational opportunities in west Louisville, from early childhood through adult learning.
We believe that having a long-term-focused, committed, and engaged shareholder base, anchored by the Brown Family, gives us a distinct strategic advantage, particularly in a business with multi-generational brands and products that must be aged. We are committed to continually improving our environmental, social, and governance performance and acting upon our deeply held values. Recognizing the strong cash-generating capacity and the capital efficiency of our business, we will continue to pursue top-tier shareholder return through shareholder-friendly capital allocation and socially and environmentally conscious investments to fuel long-term growth.
Human Capital Resources
Overview: Culture of Care
We put our values at the forefront of all our decisions and actions, in an effort to make our employees feel respected, safe, and supported so they can make, market, and sell our products with the finest craftsmanship, quality, and care. What enables our success are the 5,200 people (excluding individuals that work on a part-time or temporary basis) we employ in 43 countries around the world. This includes approximately 3,400 salaried employees and 1,800 hourly employees, with the largest percentage of our employees residing within the United States, Mexico, and the United Kingdom. We believe our employee relations are good and our turnover rate is low.
COVID-19 Response
Shortly after the global pandemic began, we shifted nearly all global salaried employees to a virtual working environment and safely maintained our essential production operations. Over the last year, salaried employees have begun returning to their offices as local conditions have allowed. We welcomed salaried employees back to our Louisville headquarters on May 2, 2022, where we have made investments in our facilities and services to ease this transition.
The majority of our employees will be working under a hybrid work style going forward, working a minimum of three days per week in the office and the remaining days at home (or the location of their choice). We believe this structure will allow our employees to collaborate and build relationships, while enjoying the flexibility that they have come to appreciate. Flexibility has been a cultural priority at Brown-Forman since well before the pandemic and we are pleased to have found a solution that meets the needs of our business and our employees.
Structural Investments
We launched a new capability and organization within Brown-Forman that we call “Integrated Marketing Communications” (IMC). IMC focuses on driving excellence within five highly integrated, interdependent disciplines: e-commerce, Media, Performance, Search, and Content. These disciplines are supported by increased investments to advance our consumer-centric philosophy, agile processes, technology, and our organization, which has been significantly enhanced to support this initiative. The IMC organization consists of many marketers around the world who are solely focused on advancing our digital marketing and e-commerce initiatives. This includes new roles that we have recently created, which has given us the opportunity to elevate internal talent as well as incorporate external talent from leading companies with critical expertise. Through IMC, we can better meet consumers where they are by customizing content to maximize relevance and more effectively drive their behavior. We can now do this in real time and at scale. By integrating e-commerce within IMC, we can create a truly cohesive end-to-end consumer journey starting from awareness and closing the loop with sales.
Diversity & Inclusion
We are continuing to pursue our 2030 Diversity & Inclusion strategy, as outlined in Many Spirits, One Brown-Forman: Gender and Race Edition. This year, we continued to increase the number of women in senior leadership globally and people of color in the United States through both internal promotions and external hiring.
To support our culture of inclusion, all executive leaders participated in our six month Inclusive Leadership Program. This group completed the program at the end of the calendar year and we have recently begun cascading it down to our business leaders.
13
Workforce Stability
We must remain focused on winning the war for talent in a marketplace where opportunities abound and highly skilled knowledge workers can work from anywhere. While we have historically enjoyed low turnover amongst our salaried population, we have tracked our departures carefully over the last year, given the acceleration of the job market. We have analyzed our data quarterly, looking at cuts by gender, ethnicity, function, location, age, management level, etc. in addition to qualitative exit interview data. We have been pleased to find that our turnover remains consistent with our pre-pandemic levels. We will, of course, continue to monitor our data carefully.
14
Executive Officers
Information about Our Executive Officers
The following persons served as executive officers as of June 17, 2022:
Name | Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience | ||||||
Lawson E. Whiting | 53 | President and Chief Executive Officer since 2019. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2017 to December 2018. Executive Vice President and Chief Brands and Strategy Officer from 2015 to 2017. Senior Vice President and Chief Brands Officer from 2013 to 2015. Senior Vice President and Managing Director for Western Europe from 2011 to 2013. Vice President and Finance Director for Western Europe from 2010 to 2011. Vice President and Finance Director for North America from 2009 to 2010. | ||||||
Matthew E. Hamel | 62 | Executive Vice President and General Counsel since 2021. Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 2007 to 2021. | ||||||
Leanne D. Cunningham | 52 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2021. Senior Vice President, Shareholder Relations Officer, Global Commercial Finance, and Financial Planning and Analysis from August 2020 to June 2021. Senior Vice President, Shareholder Relations Officer from August 2019 to July 2020. Senior Vice President, and General Manager - Brown-Forman Brands from May 2015 to July 2019. Vice President, Director of Finance Global Production from October 2013 to April 2015. Vice President, Chief of Staff and Director of Business Development Global Production from November 2009 to October 2013. | ||||||
Matias Bentel | 47 | Senior Vice President and Chief Brands Officer since January 2020. Senior Vice President and Managing Director of Jack Daniel’s Family of Brands from August 2018 to January 2020. Vice President and General Manager of Mexico from January 2016 to August 2018. Vice President Latin America Marketing and Chief of Staff from October 2009 to January 2016. | ||||||
Kelli N. Brown | 52 | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since August 2018. Vice President and Director Finance (North America Region) from 2015 to August 2018. Director NAR Division Finance (North America Region) from 2013 to 2015. Director Business Planning and Analytics (North America Region) from 2012 to 2013. | ||||||
Ralph E. de Chabert | 75 | Senior Vice President, Chief Corporate Citizenship Officer since February 2022. Senior Vice President, Chief Diversity Inclusion and Global Community Relations Officer from March 2019 to February 2022. Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer from 2007 to 2019. | ||||||
Marshall B. Farrer | 51 | Senior Vice President, President Europe since August 2020. Senior Vice President, Managing Director, Global Travel Retail and Developed APAC Region from August 2018 to July 2020. Senior Vice President, Managing Director, Global Travel Retail from July 2018 to May 2015. Vice President, Managing Director, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey from January 2014 to April 2015. Vice President, Managing Director, Australia/New Zealand region from 2010 to 2014. | ||||||
Kirsten M. Hawley | 52 | Senior Vice President, Chief People, Places, and Communications Officer since May 2021. Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Corporate Communications Officer from March 2019 to April 2021. Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer from February 2015 to February 2019. Senior Vice President and Director of Human Resources Business Partnerships from 2013 to 2015. Vice President and Director of Organization and Leader Development from 2011 to 2013. | ||||||
John V. Hayes | 62 | Senior Vice President, President, U.S.A. and Canada since June 2018. Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer of Brown-Forman Brands from February 2015 to June 2018. Senior Vice President, Managing Director Jack Daniel’s from 2011 to 2015. | ||||||
Thomas W. Hinrichs | 60 | Senior Vice President, President Emerging International since August 2020. Senior Vice President, President, International Division from June 2018 to July 2020. Senior Vice President and President for Europe, North Asia, and ANZSEA from February 2015 to June 2018. Senior Vice President and Managing Director for Europe from 2013 to 2015. Senior Vice President and Managing Director for Greater Europe and Africa from 2006 to 2013. | ||||||
Timothy M. Nall | 51 | Senior Vice President, Chief Global Supply Chain and Technology Officer since March 2022. Senior Vice President, Chief Information and Advanced Analytics Officer from January 2015 to February 2022. Vice President Director Technical Services from May 2013 to December 2014. Vice President Director Wines/ENV/Govt Comp 2011 to 2013. | ||||||
Crystal L. Peterson | 51 | Vice President, Chief Inclusion and Global Community Relations Officer since June 2022. Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer from February 2022 to June 2022. Vice President and Human Resources Director - Global Production, Diversity and Inclusion from March 2021 to January 2022. Vice President and Human Resources Director - Global Production from August 2017 to February 2021. Vice President and Human Resources Director - North America Region from May 2015 to July 2017. Human Resources Director - North America Region and Latin America Region from May 2013 to April 2015. | ||||||
15
Available Information
Our website address is www.brown-forman.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information provided on our website, and any other website referenced herein, is not part of this report, and is therefore not incorporated by reference into this report or any other filing we make with the SEC, unless that information is otherwise specifically incorporated by reference.
On our website, we have posted our Code of Conduct that applies to all our directors and employees, and our Code of Ethics that applies specifically to our senior financial officers. If we amend or waive any of the provisions of our Code of Conduct or our Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or principal accounting officer that relates to any element of the definition of “code of ethics” enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Act, as amended, we intend to disclose these actions on our website. We have also posted on our website our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and Executive Committee of our Board of Directors. Copies of these materials are also available free of charge by writing to our Secretary at 850 Dixie Highway, Louisville, Kentucky 40210 or emailing Secretary@b-f.com.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We believe the following discussion identifies the material risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business. If any of the following risks were actually to occur, our business, results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. Additional risks not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, could also materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
Our business performance is substantially dependent upon the continued health of the Jack Daniel's family of brands.
The Jack Daniel's family of brands is the primary driver of our revenue and growth. Jack Daniel's is an iconic global trademark with a loyal consumer fan base, and we invest much effort and many resources to protect and preserve the brand's reputation for authenticity, craftsmanship, and quality. A brand's reputational value is based in large part on consumer perceptions, and even an isolated incident that causes harm – particularly one resulting in widespread negative publicity – could adversely influence these perceptions and erode consumer trust and confidence in the brand. Significant damage to the brand equity of the Jack Daniel's family of brands would adversely affect our business. Given the importance of Jack Daniel's to our overall success, a significant or sustained decline in volume or selling price of our Jack Daniel's products, as a result of negative publicity or otherwise, would have a negative effect on our financial results. Additionally, should we not be successful in our efforts to maintain or increase the relevance of the Jack Daniel's brand to current and future consumers, our business and operating results could suffer. For details on the importance of the Jack Daniel's family of brands to our business, see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations - Fiscal 2022 Brand Highlights.”
Changes to our route-to-consumer models and consolidation among beverage alcohol producers, distributors, wholesalers, suppliers, and retailers, could hinder the marketing, sale, or distribution of our products.
We use various business models to market and distribute our products in different countries around the world. In the United States, we sell our products either to distributors for resale to retail outlets or e-commerce retailers or, in those states that control alcohol sales, to state governments who then sell them to retail customers and consumers. In our non-U.S. markets, we use a variety of route-to-consumer models – including, in many markets, reliance on third parties to distribute, market and sell our products. We own and operate distribution companies for 14 international markets. Transitioning from a third-party distribution model to an owned distribution model involves significant investment, and subjects us to risks associated with that geographic region. If we are unsuccessful in our route-to-consumer strategies, including any transition to owned distribution, the sale and marketing of our products could be disrupted.
Consolidation, whether domestically or internationally, among spirits producers, distributors, wholesalers, suppliers, or retailers and the increased growth of the e-commerce environment across the consumer product goods market could create a more challenging competitive landscape for our products. Consolidation accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting quarantines, “stay at home” orders, travel restrictions, retail store closures, social distancing requirements, and other government actions, created a more challenging competitive landscape for our products. Consolidation at any level could hinder the distribution and sale of our products as a result of reduced attention and resources allocated to our brands both during and
16
after transition periods, because our brands might represent a smaller portion of the new business portfolio. Furthermore, consolidation of distributors may lead to the erosion of margins as newly consolidated distributors take down prices. Changes in distributors' strategies, including a reduction in the number of brands they carry, the allocation of shelf space for our competitors' brands, or private label products, may adversely affect our growth, business, financial results, and market share.
Changes to any of our route-to-consumer models or partners in important markets could result in temporary or longer-term sales disruption, higher costs, and harm to other business relationships we might have with that partner. Disruption of our distribution network or fluctuations in our product inventory levels at distributors, wholesalers, or retailers could negatively affect our results for a particular period. Moreover, other suppliers, as well as wholesalers and retailers of our brands, offer products that compete directly with ours for shelf space, promotional displays, and consumer purchases. Pricing (including price promotions, discounting, couponing, and free goods), marketing, new product introductions, entry into our distribution networks, and other competitive behavior by other suppliers, and by wholesalers and traditional and e-commerce retailers, could adversely affect our growth, business, and financial results. While we seek to take advantage of the efficiencies and opportunities that large retail customers can offer, they often seek lower pricing and increased purchase volume flexibility, offer competing private label products, and represent a large number of other competing products. If the buying power of these large retail customers continues to increase, it could negatively affect our financial results. Further, while we believe we have sufficient scale to succeed relative to our major competitors, we nevertheless face a risk that continuing consolidation of large beverage alcohol companies could put us at a competitive disadvantage.
As noted above, e-commerce distribution grew dramatically early in the COVID-19 pandemic and is likely to continue growing in the future. Our competitors may respond to industry and economic conditions and shifts in consumer behaviors more rapidly or effectively than we do. To remain competitive, we must be agile and efficient in adopting digital technologies, and building analytical capabilities, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic, which our competitors may be able to achieve with more agility and resources.
Changes in consumer preferences and purchases, any decline in the social acceptability of our products, or governmental adoption of policies disadvantageous to beverage alcohol could negatively affect our business results.
We are a branded consumer products company in a highly competitive market, and our success depends substantially on our continued ability to offer consumers appealing, high-quality products. Consumer preferences and purchases may shift, often in unpredictable ways, including health and wellness trends; changes in economic conditions, demographic, and social trends; public health policies and initiatives; changes in government regulation of beverage alcohol products; concerns or regulations related to product safety; legalization of cannabis and its use on a more widespread basis within the United States, Canada, or elsewhere; and changes in trends related to travel, leisure, dining, gifting, entertaining, and beverage consumption trends. Consumers may begin to shift their consumption and purchases from our premium and super-premium products, more commonly found in on-premise establishments, in favor of off-premise purchases or away from alcoholic beverages entirely. This includes consumption at home as a result of various factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic, shifts in social trends, and shifts to purchases of our products to e-commerce retailers. These shifts in consumption and purchasing channels, which could adversely impact our profitability, have accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting quarantines, “stay at home” orders, travel restrictions, retail, restaurant, bar, and hotel closures, social distancing requirements, and other government action. Consumers also may begin to prefer the products of competitors or may generally reduce their demand for brands produced by larger companies. Over the past several years, the number of small, local distilleries in the United States has grown significantly. This growth is being driven by a trend of consumers showing increasing interest in locally produced, regionally sourced products. As more brands enter the market, increased competition could negatively affect demand for our premium and super-premium American whiskey brands, including Jack Daniel’s. In addition, we could experience unfavorable business results if we fail to attract consumers from diverse backgrounds and ethnicities in all markets where we sell our products. Also, expansion into new product categories by other suppliers, or innovation by new entrants into the market, could increase competition in our product categories. For example, we have observed an increase in diversification by various consumer goods companies such as the entrance of both traditional beer and soft drink companies into the RTD market and the entrance of both beer and spirits companies into the cannabis market – expanding the potential for competition in the spirits market from various sectors of the consumer goods industry. Increased competition may, among other things, negatively impact our ability to maintain or gain market share; increase pricing pressure, which inhibits our ability to adequately respond to inflationary changes in commodities used in making our products; require increases in marketing and promotional activities; and negatively impact the market for our premium and super-premium products. To continue to succeed, we must anticipate or react effectively to shifts in demographics, our competition, consumer behavior, consumer preferences, drinking tastes, and drinking occasions.
Our long-term plans call for the continued growth of the Jack Daniel's family of brands. If these plans do not succeed, or if we otherwise fail to develop or implement effective business, portfolio, and brand strategies, our growth, business, or
17
financial results could suffer. More broadly, if consumers shift away from spirits (particularly brown spirits such as American whiskey and bourbon), our premium-priced brands, or our RTD products, our financial results could be adversely affected.
We believe that new products, line extensions, label and bottle changes, product reformulations, and similar product innovations by both our competitors and us will compete increasingly for consumer drinking occasions. Product innovation, particularly for our core brands, is a significant element of our growth strategy; however, there can be no assurance that we will continue to develop and implement successful line extensions, packaging, formulation or flavor changes, or new products.
Unsuccessful implementation or short-lived popularity of our product innovations could result in inventory write-offs and other costs, reduction in profits from one year to the next, and also could damage consumers' perception of our brand family. Our inability to attract consumers to our product innovations relative to our competitors' products – especially over time – could negatively affect our growth, business, and financial results.
Production facility disruption could adversely affect our business.
Some of our largest brands, including Jack Daniel's and our tequilas, are distilled at single locations. A catastrophic event causing physical damage, disruption, or failure at any one of our major distillation or bottling facilities, including facilities that support the production of our premium brands such as Woodford Reserve and Old Forester, could adversely affect our business. Further, because whiskeys and some tequilas are aged for various periods, we maintain a substantial inventory of aged and maturing products in warehouses at a number of different sites. The loss of a substantial amount of aged inventory – through fire, other natural or man-made disaster, contamination, or otherwise – could significantly reduce the supply of the affected product or products. These and other supply (or supply chain) disruptions could prevent us from meeting consumer demand for the affected products in the near term or the short term. In addition to catastrophic events identified above, supply disruptions could include the temporary inability to make our products at normal levels or at all. We could also experience disruptions if our suppliers are unable to deliver supplies as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise. Disaster recovery plans may not prevent business disruption, and reconstruction of any damaged facilities could require a significant amount of time and resources.
The inherent uncertainty in supply/demand forecasting could adversely affect our business, particularly with respect to our aged products.
There is an inherent risk of forecasting imprecision in determining the quantity of aged and maturing products to produce and hold in inventory in a given year for future sale. The forecasting strategies we use to balance product supply with fluctuations in consumer demand may not be effective for particular years or products. For example, in addition to our American and Irish whiskeys and some tequilas, which are aged for various periods, our Scotch whisky brands, require long-term maturation – an average of 12 years with limited releases of 30 years or more – making forecasts of demand for such products in future periods subject to significant uncertainty. Our tequila supply is also dependent on the growth cycle of our agave plants which take approximately seven years to reach full maturity, requiring us to make forecasts of demand for our tequilas over a long-time horizon to determine in advance how much agave to plant. Factors that affect our ability to forecast accurately include changes in business strategy, market demand, consumer preferences, macroeconomic conditions, introductions of competing products, and other changes in market conditions. Additionally, our supply of aged products can deviate from expectations due to changes in forecasted maturation loss. Any forecasting error could lead to our inability to meet the objectives of our business strategy, failure to meet future demand, or a future surplus of inventory and consequent write-down in value of raw materials. A failure to accurately forecast demand for our products or efficiently manage inventory, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. Further, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in using various levers, such as pricing changes, to create the desired balance of available supply and consumer demand for particular years or products. As a consequence, we may be unable to meet consumer demand for the affected products for a period of time. Furthermore, not having our products in the market consistently may adversely affect our brand equity and future sales.
Higher costs or unavailability of water, raw materials, product ingredients, or labor could adversely affect our financial results.
Our products use materials and ingredients that we purchase from suppliers. Our ability to make and sell our products depends upon the availability of the raw materials, product ingredients, finished products, wood, glass and PET bottles, cans, bottle closures, packaging, and other materials used to produce and package them. Without sufficient quantities of one or more key materials, our business and financial results could suffer. For instance, only a few glass producers make bottles on a scale sufficient for our requirements, and a single producer supplies most of our glass requirements. Beginning in 2020, as a result of global supply chain challenges, our primary glass provider was not able to produce sufficient quantities to meet our needs, which increased our cost of production and adversely affected our financial results. While we continue to see improvements in our glass supply, overall supply chain logistics and transportation continue to be constrained, impacting our route to market
18
costs and lead times. We project that logistics and transport constraints will persist at least through calendar 2022 and possibly through calendar 2023. Similar new supply chain challenges may occur in the future, making it difficult and more expensive to produce and deliver our products. For example, if we were to experience a disruption in the supply of American white oak logs or steel to produce the new charred oak barrels in which we age our whiskeys, our production capabilities could be compromised. If any of our key suppliers were no longer able to meet our timing, quality, or capacity requirements, ceased doing business with us, or significantly raised prices, and we could not promptly develop alternative cost-effective sources of supply or production, our operations and financial results could suffer.
Higher costs or insufficient availability of suitable grain, agave, water, grapes, wood, glass, closures, and other input materials, or higher associated labor costs or insufficient availability of labor, may adversely affect our financial results. Similarly, when energy costs rise, our transportation, freight, and other operating costs, such as distilling and bottling expenses, also may increase. Our freight cost and the timely delivery of our products could be adversely affected by a number of factors that could reduce the profitability of our operations, including driver or equipment shortages, higher fuel costs, weather conditions, traffic congestion, shipment container availability, rail shut down, increased government regulation, and other matters. Our financial results may be adversely affected if we are not able to pass along energy, freight, or other input cost increases through higher prices to our customers without reducing demand or sales. For example, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced supply chain disruptions in connection with the availability of timely modes of transportation to ship our products globally.
International or domestic geopolitical or other events, including the imposition of any tariffs or quotas by governmental authorities on any raw materials that we use in the production of our products, could adversely affect the supply and cost of these raw materials to us. For example, the global economy has been negatively impacted by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Global grain and energy markets have become increasingly volatile as sanctions have been imposed on Russia by other countries, including the United States and the European Union, in response to the invasion. As a result, we have suspended our operations in Russia, and it is not clear if, or when, we will be able to resume doing business in Russia. While we do not currently expect our production operations to be directly impacted by the conflict, changes in global grain and commodity pricing and availability may impact the markets in which we operate. If we cannot offset higher raw material costs with higher selling prices, increased sales volume, or reductions in other costs, our profitability could be adversely affected.
Weather, the effects of climate change, fires, diseases, and other agricultural uncertainties that affect the mortality, health, yield, quality, or price of the various raw materials used in our products also present risks for our business, including in some cases potential impairment in the recorded value of our inventory. Climate change could also affect the maturation and yield of our aged inventory over time. Changes in weather patterns or intensity can disrupt our supply chain as well, which may affect production operations, insurance costs and coverage, and the timely delivery of our products.
Water is an essential component of our products, so the quality and quantity of available water is important to our ability to operate our business. If extended droughts become more common or severe, or if our water supply were interrupted for other reasons, high-quality water could become scarce in some key production regions for our products, including Tennessee, Kentucky, California, Finland, Mexico, Scotland, and Ireland, which in turn could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Our business faces various risks related to health epidemics and pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic and similar outbreaks, that could materially and adversely affect our business, our operations, our cash flows, and our financial results.
Our business, operations, cash flows, and financial results have been impacted and will likely continue to be impacted by health epidemics, pandemics, and similar outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has had and could continue to have negative impacts, such as (a) a global or U.S. recession or other economic crisis; (b) credit and capital markets volatility (and access to these markets, including by our suppliers and customers); (c) volatility in demand for our products; (d) changes in accessibility to our products due to illness, quarantines, “stay at home” orders, travel restrictions, retail, restaurant, bar, and hotel closures, social distancing requirements, and other government action; (e) changes in consumer behavior and preferences; and (f) disruptions in raw material supply, our manufacturing operations, or in our distribution and supply chain. Furthermore, during the COVID-19 pandemic, we were affected in markets where, in connection with other government actions taken to slow the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, liquor sales were temporarily restricted or banned outright such as in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the United States, and in South Africa, India, and other Asian countries. In addition, we may incur increased costs and otherwise be negatively affected if a significant portion of our workforce (or the workforces within our distribution or supply chain) is unable to work or work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, “stay at home” orders, social distancing requirements, other government action, facility closures, or other restrictions.
19
The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (and any related variations) depends on factors beyond our knowledge or control, including the duration, severity, and potential resurgence of the outbreak and actions taken to contain its spread and mitigate the public health effects, including vaccine efficacy, and its short- and long-term impacts on the economy, unemployment, consumer confidence, and the financial health of our suppliers, distributors, customers, and retailers. We cannot predict with certainty the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business or our future financial or operational results. For further discussion on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and financial results, see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Significant Developments - COVID-19.”
Unfavorable economic conditions could negatively affect our operations and results.
Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions may be triggered by numerous developments beyond our control, including geopolitical events, health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and other events that trigger economic volatility on a global or regional basis. Those types of unfavorable economic conditions could adversely affect our business and financial results. In particular, a significant deterioration in economic conditions, including economic slowdowns or recessions, increased unemployment levels, inflationary pressures or disruptions to credit and capital markets, could lead to decreased consumer confidence in certain countries and consumer spending more generally, thus reducing consumer demand for our products. For example, in 2021 and continuing into 2022, the United States and European Union have experienced a rapid increase in inflation levels. Such heightened inflationary levels may negatively impact consumer disposable income and discretionary spending and, in turn, reduce consumer demand for our premium products and increase our costs. Unfavorable economic conditions could also cause governments to increase taxes on beverage alcohol to attempt to raise revenue, reducing consumers' willingness to make discretionary purchases of beverage alcohol products or pay for premium brands such as ours.
Unfavorable economic conditions could also adversely affect our suppliers, distributors, customers, and retailers, who in turn could experience cash flow challenges, more costly or unavailable financing, credit defaults, and other financial hardships. Such financial hardships could lead to distributor or retailer destocking, disruption in raw material supply, increase in bad debt expense, or increased levels of unsecured credit that we may need to provide to customers. Other potential negative consequences to our business from unfavorable economic conditions include higher interest rates, an increase in the rate of inflation, deflation, exchange rate fluctuations, credit or capital market instability, or lower returns on pension assets or lower discount rates for pension obligations (possibly requiring higher contributions to our pension plans). For additional details on the effects of COVID-19 on our operations and financial results, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Significant Developments - COVID-19.” For details on the effects of changes in the value of our benefit plan obligations and assets on our financial results, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Product recalls or other product liability claims could materially and adversely affect our sales.
The success of our brands depends upon the positive image that consumers have of them. We could decide to or be required to recall products due to suspected or confirmed product contamination, product tampering, spoilage, regulatory non-compliance, food safety issues, or other quality issues. Any of these events could adversely affect our financial results. Actual contamination, whether deliberate or accidental, could lead to inferior product quality and even illness, injury, or death to consumers, potential liability claims, and material loss. Should a product recall become necessary, or we voluntarily recall a product in the event of contamination, damage, or other quality issue, sales of the affected product or our broader portfolio of brands could be adversely affected. A significant product liability judgment or widespread product recall may negatively impact sales and our business and financial results. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, resulting negative publicity could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image.
Negative publicity could affect our business performance.
Unfavorable publicity, whether accurate or not, related to our industry or to us or our products, brands, marketing, executive leadership, employees, Board of Directors, family shareholders, operations, current or anticipated business performance, or environmental or social efforts could negatively affect our corporate reputation, stock price, ability to attract and retain high-quality talent, or the performance of our brands and business. Adverse publicity or negative commentary on social media outlets, whether accurate or not, particularly any that go “viral,” could cause consumers or other stakeholders to react by disparaging or avoiding our brands or company, which could materially negatively affect our financial results. Additionally, investor advocacy groups, institutional investors, other market participants, shareholders, employees, consumers, customers, and policymakers have focused increasingly on the environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) or “sustainability” positions and practices of companies. If our ESG positions or practices do not meet investor or other stakeholder expectations and standards, which continue to evolve, our corporate reputation, stock price, ability to attract and
20
retain high-quality talent, and the performance of our brands and business may be negatively affected. Stakeholders who disagree with our company's actions, positions, or statements may speak negatively or advocate against the company, with the potential to harm our reputation or business through negative publicity, adverse government treatment, or other means.
Our failure to attract or retain key talent could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends upon the efforts and abilities of our senior management team, other key employees, and our high-quality employee base, as well as our ability to attract, motivate, reward, and retain them. Difficulties in hiring or retaining key executive or other employee talent, or the unexpected loss of experienced employees resulting in the depletion of our institutional knowledge base, could have an adverse impact on our business performance, reputation, financial condition, or results of operations. Given changing demographics, changes in immigration laws and policies, the increasing normalization of remote working, and demand for talent globally, we may not be able to find the right people with the right skills, at the right time, and in the right location, to achieve our business objectives.
We might not succeed in our strategies for investments, acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic transactions.
From time to time, we acquire or invest in additional brands or businesses. We expect to continue to seek acquisition and investment opportunities that we believe will increase long-term stockholder value, but we may not be able to find investment opportunities, or purchase brands or businesses, at acceptable prices and terms. Acquisitions and investments involve risks and uncertainties, including potential difficulties integrating acquired brands and personnel; the possible loss of key customers or employees most knowledgeable about the acquired business; implementing and maintaining consistent U.S. public company standards, controls, procedures, policies, and information systems; exposure to unknown liabilities; business disruption; and management distraction or departure. Acquisitions, investments, or joint ventures could also lead us to incur additional debt and related interest expenses or issue additional shares, and result in a reduction in our earnings per share and a decrease in our return on invested capital. We could incur future restructuring charges or record impairment losses on the value of goodwill or other intangible assets resulting from previous acquisitions, which may also negatively affect our financial results.
From time to time, we also consider disposing of assets or businesses that may no longer meet our financial or strategic objectives. In selling assets or businesses, we may not get prices or terms as favorable as we anticipated. We could also encounter difficulty in finding buyers on acceptable terms in a timely manner, which could delay our accomplishment of strategic objectives. Expected cost savings from reduced overhead, relating to the sold assets, may not materialize. The overhead reductions could temporarily disrupt our other business operations. Any of these outcomes could negatively affect our financial results.
Risks Related to Our Global Operations
Our global business is subject to commercial, political, and financial risks.
Our products are sold in more than 170 countries; accordingly, we are subject to risks associated with doing business globally, including commercial, political, and financial risks. In addition, we are subject to potential business disruption caused by military conflicts; potentially unstable governments or legal systems; social, racial, civil, or political upheaval or unrest; local labor policies and conditions; possible expropriation, nationalization, or confiscation of assets; problems with repatriation of foreign earnings; economic or trade sanctions; closure of markets to imports; anti-American sentiment; terrorism, kidnapping, extortion, or other types of violence in or outside the United States; and health pandemics (such as COVID-19).
Additionally, in 2018, the United States imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum. In response, a number of countries imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports, including on our American whiskey products. Such retaliatory tariffs have negatively affected our results of operations through lower net sales and higher cost of sales. However, in October 2021, the United States and the European Union reached an agreement whereby, beginning January 1, 2022, the U.S. lifted the steel and aluminum duties and applied a tariff-rate-quota allowing duty-free importation of steel and aluminum from the European Union based on historical volumes, and, in response, the European Union suspended its retaliatory tariffs that have been in place on certain U.S. products, including our American whiskey products. Likewise, in March 2022, the United States and the United Kingdom reached a similar agreement, effective on June 1, 2022. Any new or additional increases in tariffs, custom duties, or other restrictions or barriers on imports and exports, or the further deterioration of economic relations between the United States and other countries could result in an increase in the price of our products and, to the extent that we absorb the costs of tariffs, result in higher cost of goods sold and lower gross profit and margins. Additionally, it could limit the availability of our products and prompt consumers to seek alternative products. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to overcome the challenges we encounter with respect to these risks and other factors affecting U.S. export companies with a global business.
A failure to comply with anti-corruption laws, trade sanctions and restrictions, or similar laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
21
Some of the countries where we do business have a higher risk of corruption than others. While we are committed to doing business in accordance with all applicable laws, including anti-corruption laws and global trade restrictions, we remain subject to the risk that an employee, or one of our many direct or indirect business partners, may take action determined to be in violation of international trade, money laundering, anti-corruption, or other laws, sanctions, or regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or equivalent local laws. Because the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted numerous local economies, government intervention in local economies and businesses has increased, which has elevated the risk of and opportunity for corruption. Any determination that our operations or activities are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, particularly those related to anti-corruption and international economic or trade sanctions, could result in investigations, interruption of business, loss of business partner relationships, suspension or termination of licenses and permits (our own or those of our partners), imposition of fines, legal or equitable sanctions, negative publicity, and management distraction or departure. Further, our continued compliance with applicable anti-corruption, economic and trade sanctions, or other laws or regulations, our Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and our other policies could result in higher operating costs, delays, or even competitive disadvantages.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
The global scope of our business means that foreign currency rate fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar influence our financial results. In many markets outside the United States, we sell our products and pay for some goods, services, and talent primarily in local currencies. Because our foreign currency revenues exceed our foreign currency expense, we have a net exposure to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to those currencies. Over time, our reported financial results will be hurt by a stronger U.S. dollar and will be benefited by a weaker one. We do not attempt to hedge all of our foreign currency exposure. We attempt to hedge a portion of our foreign currency exposure through the use of foreign currency derivatives or other means; however, even in those cases, we do not fully eliminate our foreign currency exposure. For details on how foreign exchange affects our business, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk - Foreign currency exchange rate risk.”
Legal and Regulatory Risks
National and local governments may adopt regulations or undertake investigations that could limit our business activities or increase our costs.
Our business is subject to extensive regulatory requirements regarding production, exportation, importation, marketing and promotion, labeling, distribution, pricing, and trade practices, among others. Changes in laws, regulatory measures, or governmental policies, or the manner in which current ones are interpreted, could cause us to incur material additional costs or liabilities and jeopardize the growth of our business in the affected market. Specifically, governments may prohibit, impose, or increase limitations on advertising and promotional activities, or times or locations where beverage alcohol may be sold or consumed, or adopt other measures that could limit our opportunities to reach consumers or sell our products. Certain countries historically have banned all television, newspaper, magazine, and digital commerce/advertising for beverage alcohol products. Increases in regulation of this nature could substantially reduce consumer awareness of our products in the affected markets and make the introduction of new products more challenging.
Additional regulation in the United States and other countries addressing climate change, use of water, and other environmental issues could increase our operating costs. Increasing regulation of fuel emissions could increase the cost of energy, including fuel, required to operate our facilities or transport and distribute our products, thereby substantially increasing the production, distribution, and supply chain costs associated with our products.
Tax increases and changes in tax rules could adversely affect our financial results.
Our business is sensitive to changes in both direct and indirect taxes. New tax rules, accounting standards, or pronouncements, and changes in interpretation of existing rules, standards, or pronouncements could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. As a multinational company based in the United States, we are more exposed to the impact of changes in U.S. tax legislation and regulations than most of our major competitors, especially those that affect the effective corporate income tax rate. For example, tax proposals sponsored by the current U.S. presidential administration could lead to U.S. tax changes, including significant increases to the U.S. corporate income tax rate and the minimum tax rate on certain earnings of foreign subsidiaries. While we are unable to predict whether any of these changes will ultimately be enacted, if these or similar proposals are enacted into law, they could negatively impact our effective tax rate and reduce net earnings.
At the global level, potential changes in tax rules or the interpretation of tax rules arising out of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project initiated by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development include increased residual profit allocations to market jurisdictions and the implementation of a global minimum tax rate. It is possible that the adoption of
22
these or other proposals could have a material impact on our net income and cash flows. Furthermore, changes in the earnings mix or applicable foreign tax laws could also negatively impact our effective tax rates.
Our business operations are also subject to numerous duties or taxes that are not based on income, sometimes referred to as “indirect taxes.” These indirect taxes include excise taxes, sales or value-added taxes, property taxes, payroll taxes, import and export duties, and tariffs. Increases in or the imposition of new indirect taxes on our operations or products would increase the cost of our products or materials used to produce our products or, to the extent levied directly on consumers, make our products less affordable, which could negatively affect our financial results by reducing purchases of our products and encouraging consumers to switch to lower-priced or lower-taxed product categories. As governmental entities look for increased sources of revenue, they may increase taxes on beverage alcohol products. In fiscal 2022, we have observed excise tax increases in Turkey, France, Finland, Romania, and the annual Australian increase tied to the consumer price index, while we also note that Brazil enacted an excise tax decrease. Additionally, during fiscal 2022, Australia is considering proposals to change the country’s overall beverage alcohol tax policies.
Our ability to market and sell our products depends heavily on societal attitudes toward drinking and governmental policies that both flow from and affect those attitudes.
Increased social and political attention has been directed at the beverage alcohol industry. For example, there remains continued attention focused largely on public health concerns related to alcohol abuse, including drunk driving, underage drinking, and the negative health impacts of the abuse and misuse of beverage alcohol. While most people who drink enjoy alcoholic beverages in moderation, it is commonly known and well reported that excessive levels or inappropriate patterns of drinking can lead to increased risk of a range of health conditions and, for certain people, can result in alcohol dependence. Some academics, public health officials, and critics of the alcohol industry in the United States, Europe, and other parts of the world continue to seek governmental measures to make beverage alcohol more expensive, less available, or more difficult to advertise and promote. If future scientific research indicates more widespread serious health risks associated with alcohol consumption – particularly with moderate consumption – or if for any reason the social acceptability of beverage alcohol declines significantly, sales of our products could be adversely affected.
Significant additional labeling or warning requirements or limitations on the availability of our products could inhibit sales of affected products.
Various jurisdictions have adopted or may seek to adopt significant additional product labeling or warning requirements or impose limitations on the availability of our products relating to the content or perceived adverse health consequences of some of our products. Several such labeling regulations or laws require warnings on any product with substances that the jurisdiction lists as potentially associated with cancer or birth defects. Our products already raise health and safety concerns for some regulators, and heightened requirements could be imposed. For example, in 2020 in Australia and New Zealand, after concerted campaigning from advocacy groups, the government legislated mandatory pregnancy warning labels to be applied to alcohol beverages with a transition period of three years. Additionally, in February 2021, the European Union published its Europe Beating Cancer Plan. As part of the plan, by the end of 2023, the European Union will issue a proposal for mandatory health warnings on beverage alcohol product labels. Such campaigns could result in additional governmental regulations concerning the production, marketing, labeling, or availability of our products, any of which could damage our reputation, make our premium brands unrecognizable, or reduce demand for our products, which could adversely affect our profitability. If additional or more severe requirements of this type are imposed on one or more of our major products under current or future health, environmental, or other laws or regulations, they could inhibit sales of such products. Further, we cannot predict whether our products will become subject to increased rules and regulations, which, if enacted, could increase our costs or adversely impact sales.
Counterfeiting or inadequate protection of our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business prospects.
Our brand names, trademarks, and related intellectual property rights are critical assets, and our business depends on protecting them online and in the countries where we do business. We may not succeed in protecting our intellectual property rights in a given market or in challenging those who infringe our rights or imitate or counterfeit our products. Although we believe that our intellectual property rights are legally protected in the markets where we do business, the ability to register and enforce intellectual property rights varies from country to country. In some countries, for example, it may be more difficult to successfully stop counterfeiting or look-alike products, either because the law is inadequate or, even though satisfactory legal options may exist, it may be difficult to obtain and enforce sanctions against counterfeiters. We may not be able to register our trademarks in every country where we want to sell a particular product, and we may not obtain favorable decisions by courts or trademark offices.
Many global spirits brands, including some of our brands, experience problems with product counterfeiting and other forms of trademark infringement. We combat counterfeiting by working with other companies in the spirits industry through
23
our membership in the Alliance Against Counterfeit Spirits (AACS) and with brand owners in other industries via our membership in React, an anti-counterfeiting network organization. While we believe AACS and React are effective organizations, they are not active in every market, and their efforts are subject to obtaining the cooperation of local authorities and courts in the markets where they are active. Despite the efforts of AACS, React, and our own teams, lower-quality and counterfeit products that could be harmful to consumers could reach the market and adversely affect our intellectual property rights, brand equity, corporate reputation, and financial results. In addition, the industry as a whole could suffer negative effects related to the manufacture, sale, and consumption of illegally produced beverage alcohol. In connection with the COVID-19 pandemic and its resulting economic impacts, a reduction in government actions and interventions in local economies and businesses may create an elevated risk of, and opportunity for, counterfeiting.
Litigation and legal disputes could expose our business to financial and reputational risk.
Major private or governmental litigation challenging the production, marketing, promotion, distribution, or sale of beverage alcohol or specific brands could affect our ability to sell our products. Because litigation and other legal proceedings can be costly to defend, even actions that are ultimately decided in our favor could have a negative impact on our business reputation or financial results. Lawsuits have been brought against beverage alcohol companies alleging problems related to alcohol abuse, negative health consequences from drinking, problems from alleged marketing or sales practices, and underage drinking. While these lawsuits have been largely unsuccessful in the past, others may succeed in the future. We could also experience employment-related or cybersecurity-related class actions, environmental claims, commercial disputes, product liability actions stemming from a beverage or container production defect, a whistleblower suit, or other major litigation that could adversely affect our business results, particularly if there is negative publicity.
Governmental actions around the world to enforce trade practice, anti-money-laundering, anti-corruption, competition, tax, environmental, and other laws are also a continuing compliance risk for global companies such as ours. In addition, as a U.S. public company, we are exposed to the risk of securities-related class action suits, particularly following a precipitous drop in the share price of our stock. Adverse developments in major lawsuits concerning these or other matters could result in management distraction and have a material adverse effect on our business.
Risks Related to Cybersecurity and Data Privacy
A cyber breach, a failure or corruption of one or more of our key information technology systems, networks, processes, associated sites, or service providers, or a failure to comply with personal data protection laws could have a material adverse impact on our business.
We rely on information technology (IT) systems, networks, and services, including internet sites, data hosting and processing facilities and tools, hardware (including laptops and mobile devices), software, and technical applications and platforms, some of which are managed, hosted, provided, or used by third parties or their vendors, to help us manage our business. The various uses of these IT systems, networks, and services include: hosting our internal network and communication systems; ordering and managing materials from suppliers; billing and collecting cash from our customers; supply/demand planning; inventory planning; production; shipping products to customers; paying our employees; hosting corporate strategic plans and employee data; hosting our branded websites and marketing products to consumers; collecting and storing data on suppliers, customers, consumers, stockholders, employees, former employees, and beneficiaries of employees or former employees; processing transactions; summarizing and reporting results of operations; hosting, processing, and sharing confidential and proprietary research, business plans, and financial reporting and information; complying with regulatory, legal, or tax requirements; providing data security; and handling other processes necessary to manage our business.
Increased IT security threats and more sophisticated cybercrimes and cyberattacks, including computer viruses and other malicious codes, ransomware, unauthorized access attempts, denial of service attacks, phishing, social engineering, hacking, and other types of attacks, pose a risk to the security and availability of our IT systems, networks, and services, including those that are managed, hosted, provided, or used by third parties, as well as the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of our data and the data of our customers, partners, consumers, employees, stockholders, suppliers, and others. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, a greater number of our employees are working remotely and accessing our technology infrastructure remotely, which further increases our attack surface. For example, in July 2020, we discovered a data breach incident involving malware and related behaviors that resulted in unauthorized access to our IT networks.
Unauthorized access to our IT network or that of our service providers could result in failure of our IT systems, networks, or services to function properly. This could lead to the loss or unauthorized disclosure of our business strategy or other sensitive information; interruptions in our ability to manage operations; and reputational, competitive, or business harm, which may adversely affect our business operations or financial results. In addition, such IT disruptions could result in unauthorized disclosure of material confidential information, resulting in financial and reputational damage because of lost or
24
misappropriated confidential information belonging to us or to our partners, customers, consumers, employees, or former employees and their beneficiaries, stockholders, suppliers, or others.
As a result of any cyber breach or IT disruption, we could also be required to spend significant financial and other resources to remedy the damage. Those expenditures could include repairing or replacing networks and IT systems, which could require a significant amount of time and financial investment; responding to claims from employees, former employees, stockholders, suppliers, customers, consumers, or others; handling related litigation or governmental inquiries; or paying significant fines to regulatory agencies. Furthermore, a cyber breach at any one of our suppliers, customers, or other direct or indirect business partners could have similar impacts. Any cyber breach or IT disruption could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In the ordinary course of our business, we receive, process, transmit, and store information relating to identifiable individuals (personal data), primarily employees and former employees, but also relating to beneficiaries of employees or former employees, customers, and consumers. As a result, we are subject to various U.S. federal and state and foreign laws and regulations relating to personal data in various jurisdictions around the world. These laws change frequently, and new legislation in this area may be enacted in other jurisdictions at any time. Such laws and regulations include the California Consumer Protection Act, the California Privacy Rights Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2023, and the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). These types of laws and regulations subject us to, among other things, additional costs and expenses and may require costly changes to our business practices and security systems, policies, procedures, and practices. Improper disclosure of personal data in violation of personal data protection laws, including the GDPR, could harm our reputation, cause loss of consumer confidence, subject us to government enforcement actions (including fines), or result in private litigation against us, which could result in loss of revenue, increased costs, liability for monetary damages, fines, or criminal prosecution, all of which could negatively affect our business and operating results.
Risks Related to Our Ownership and Corporate Governance Structure
The Brown family has the ability to control the outcome of matters submitted for stockholder approval.
We are a “controlled company” under New York Stock Exchange rules. Controlled companies are exempt from New York Stock Exchange listing standards that require a board composed of a majority of independent directors, a fully independent nominating/corporate governance committee, and a fully independent compensation committee. We avail ourselves of the exemptions from having a board composed of a majority of independent directors and a fully independent nominating/corporate governance committee. Notwithstanding the available exemption, our Compensation Committee is composed exclusively of independent directors. As a result of our use of some “controlled company” exemptions, our corporate governance practices differ from those of non-controlled companies, which are subject to all of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements.
We have two classes of common stock. Our Class A common stock is entitled to full voting powers, including in the elections of directors, while our Class B common stock may not vote except as provided by the laws of Delaware. We have had two classes of common stock since 1959, when our stockholders approved the issuance of two shares of Class B non-voting common stock to every holder of our voting common stock. Such dual-class share structures have increasingly come under the scrutiny of major indices, institutional investors, and proxy advisory firms, with some calling for the reclassification of nonvoting common stock.
A majority of our voting stock is controlled by members of the Brown family, and, collectively, they have the ability to control the outcome of stockholder votes, including the election of all of our directors and the approval or rejection of any merger, change of control, or other significant corporate transactions. We believe that having a long-term-focused, committed, and engaged stockholder base provides us with a distinct strategic advantage, particularly in a business with aged products and multi-generational brands. This advantage could be eroded or lost, however, should Brown family members cease, collectively, to be controlling stockholders of the Company.
We believe that it is in the interests of all stockholders that we remain independent and family-controlled, and we believe the Brown family stockholders share these interests. Thus, our common stock dual-class share structure, as it has existed since 1959, is perpetual, and we do not have a sunset provision in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation or By-laws that provides for the eventual reclassification of the non-voting common stock to voting common stock. However, the Brown family's interests may not always be aligned with other stockholders' interests. By exercising their control, the Brown family could cause the Company to take actions that are at odds with the investment goals or interests of institutional, short-term, non-voting, or other non-controlling investors, or that have a negative effect on our stock price. Further, because the Brown family controls the majority of our voting stock, Brown-Forman might be a less attractive takeover target, which could adversely affect the market price of both our voting and our non-voting common stock. And the difference in voting rights for our common
25
stock could also adversely and disproportionately affect the value of our Class B non-voting common stock to the extent that investors view, or any potential future purchaser of our Company views, the superior voting rights and control represented by the Class A common stock to have value.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
26
Item 2. Properties
Our company-owned production facilities include distilleries, a winery, bottling plants, an RTD canning plant, warehousing operations, sawmills, cooperages, visitors' centers, and retail shops. We also have agreements with other parties for contract production in Australia, Belgium, China, Finland, Ireland, Latvia, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
In addition to our company-owned production locations and our corporate offices in Louisville, Kentucky, we lease office space for use in our sales, marketing, and administrative operations in the United States and in over 50 other cities around the world. The lease terms expire at various dates and are generally renewable. We believe that our facilities are in good condition and are adequate for our business.
Principal Properties | ||||||||
Location | Principal Activities | Notes | ||||||
United States: | ||||||||
Louisville, Kentucky | Corporate offices | Includes several renovated historic structures | ||||||
Distilling, bottling, warehousing | Home of Old Forester | |||||||
Visitors' center | ||||||||
Cooperage | Brown-Forman Cooperage | |||||||
Lynchburg, Tennessee | Distilling, bottling, warehousing | Home of Jack Daniel's | ||||||
Visitors' center | ||||||||
Woodford County, Kentucky | Distilling, bottling, warehousing | Home of Woodford Reserve | ||||||
Visitors' center | ||||||||
Windsor, California | Vineyards, winery, bottling, warehousing | Home of Sonoma-Cutrer | ||||||
Visitors' center | ||||||||
Trinity, Alabama | Cooperage | Jack Daniel Cooperage | ||||||
Clifton, Tennessee | Stave and heading mill | |||||||
Stevenson, Alabama | Stave and heading mill | |||||||
Jackson, Ohio | Stave and heading mill | Land is leased from a third party | ||||||
International: | ||||||||
Cour-Cheverny, France | Distilling, bottling, warehousing | Home of Chambord | ||||||
Amatitán, Mexico | Distilling, bottling, warehousing, RTD canning | Home of Herradura and el Jimador | ||||||
Visitors' center | ||||||||
Slane, Ireland | Distilling | Home of Slane Irish Whiskey | ||||||
Visitors' center | ||||||||
Aberdeenshire, Scotland | Distilling, warehousing | Home of Glendronach | ||||||
Visitors' center | ||||||||
Morayshire, Scotland | Distilling, warehousing | Home of Benriach | ||||||
Visitors' center | ||||||||
Newbridge, Scotland | Bottling | |||||||
Portsoy, Scotland | Distilling, warehousing | Home of Glenglassaugh | ||||||
Visitors' center |
27
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We operate in a litigious environment and we are sued in the normal course of business. We do not anticipate that any pending suits will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
28
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our Class A and Class B common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols “BFA” and “BFB,” respectively. As of May 31, 2022, there were 1,899 holders of record of Class A common stock and 3,885 holders of record of Class B common stock. Because of overlapping ownership between classes, as of May 31, 2022, we had only 5,029 distinct common stockholders of record.
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of our Class B common stock for the last five fiscal years with the Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Index, the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, and the Dow Jones U.S. Food & Beverage Index. The information presented assumes an initial investment of $100 on April 30, 2017, and that all dividends were reinvested. The graph shows the value that each of these investments would have had on April 30 in the years since 2017.
![bfb-20220430_g3.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000014693/000001469322000069/bfb-20220430_g3.jpg)
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Brown-Forman Corporation | $100 | $153 | $147 | $174 | $215 | $195 | ||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Total Return Index | $100 | $113 | $129 | $130 | $189 | $190 | ||||||||||||||
Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index | $100 | $98 | $109 | $109 | $169 | $175 | ||||||||||||||
Dow Jones U.S Food & Beverage Index | $100 | $97 | $111 | $110 | $138 | $156 |
Item 6. [Reserved]
29
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to help the reader better understand Brown-Forman, our operations, our financial results, and our current business environment. Please read this MD&A in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” (the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Our MD&A is organized as follows:
Table of Contents | |||||
Page | |||||
Presentation basis | |||||
Significant developments | |||||
Executive summary | |||||
Results of operations | |||||
Liquidity and capital resources | |||||
Critical accounting policies and estimates |
Presentation Basis
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use some financial measures in this report that are not measures of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). These non-GAAP measures, defined below, should be viewed as supplements to (not substitutes for) our results of operations and other measures reported under GAAP. Other companies may not define or calculate these non-GAAP measures in the same way.
“Organic change” in measures of statements of operations. We present changes in certain measures, or line items, of the statements of operations that are adjusted to an “organic” basis. We use “organic change” for the following measures of the statements of operations: (a) organic net sales; (b) organic cost of sales; (c) organic gross profit; (d) organic advertising expenses; (e) organic selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses; (f) organic other expense (income) net; (g) organic operating expenses2; and (h) organic operating income. To calculate these measures, we adjust, as applicable, for (1) acquisitions and divestitures, (2) foreign exchange, (3) impairment charges, and (4) a commitment to our charitable foundation. We explain these adjustments below.
•“Acquisitions and divestitures.” This adjustment removes (a) the gain or loss recognized on sale of divested brands, (b) any non-recurring effects related to our acquisitions and divestitures (e.g., transaction, transition, and integration costs or income), and (c) the effects of operating activity related to acquired and divested brands for periods not comparable year over year (non-comparable periods). Excluding non-comparable periods allows us to include the effects of acquired and divested brands only to the extent that results are comparable year over year.
During fiscal 2021, we sold our Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood brands and related assets, which resulted in a pre-tax gain of $127 million, and entered into a related transition services agreement (TSA) for these brands. Also, during fiscal 2021, we acquired Part Time Rangers Limited, which owns Part Time Rangers RTDs. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
This adjustment removes (a) transaction and integration costs related to the acquisitions and divestitures, (b) the gain on sale of Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood and related assets, (c) operating activity for the non-comparable period for Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood, which is activity in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, (d) the net sales and operating expenses recognized pursuant to the TSA related to (i) contract bottling services and (ii) distribution services in certain markets, and (e) operating activity for Part Time Rangers Holdings Limited for the non-comparable period, which is primarily activity in the first two quarters of fiscal 2022. We believe that these adjustments allow for us to better understand our organic results on a comparable basis.
•“Foreign exchange.” We calculate the percentage change in certain line items of the statements of operations in accordance with GAAP and adjust to exclude the cost or benefit of currency fluctuations. Adjusting for foreign exchange allows us to understand our business on a constant-dollar basis, as fluctuations in exchange rates can distort the organic
2 Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.
30
trend both positively and negatively. (In this report, “dollar” always means the U.S. dollar unless stated otherwise.) To eliminate the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations when comparing across periods, we translate current-year results at prior-year rates and remove transactional and hedging foreign exchange gains and losses from current- and prior-year periods.
•“Impairment Charges.” This adjustment removes the impact of impairment charges from our results of operations.
During the first three quarters of fiscal 2022, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $9 million for certain fixed assets. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $52 million for our Finlandia brand name. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” below and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.We believe that these adjustments allow for us to better understand our organic results on a comparable basis.
•“Foundation.” During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021, we committed $20 million to the Brown-Forman Foundation (the Foundation) to support the communities where our employees live and work. This adjustment removes the $20 million commitment to the Foundation from our organic SG&A expenses and organic operating income to present our organic results on a comparable basis.
We use the non-GAAP measure “organic change”, along with other metrics, to: (a) understand our performance from period to period on a consistent basis; (b) compare our performance to that of our competitors; (c) calculate components of management incentive compensation; (d) plan and forecast; and (e) communicate our financial performance to the Board of Directors, stockholders, and investment community. We provide reconciliations of the “organic change” in certain line items of the statements of operations to their nearest GAAP measures in the tables under “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2022 Highlights” and “Results of Operations - Year-Over-Year Comparisons.” We have consistently applied the adjustments within our reconciliations in arriving at each non-GAAP measure. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful to readers and investors because they enhance the understanding of our historical financial performance and comparability between periods.
As of the third quarter ended January 31, 2022, we changed certain non-GAAP financial measures that we have historically used. We no longer report “underlying changes” in certain measures of the statements of operations; instead, we now report “organic change” for certain measures of the statements of operations. “Organic change” includes all of the non-GAAP adjustments that we have historically made in adjusting GAAP to “underlying change” results, except that “organic change” does not include an adjustment for “estimated net change in distributor inventories,” which reflected the estimated net effect of changes in distributor inventories on changes in certain line items of the statements of operations. This change to our non-GAAP financial measures was in response to comments from and discussions with the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Although we no longer provide non-GAAP financial measures that adjust for “estimated net change in distributor inventories,” we still believe that our results are affected by changes in distributor inventories, particularly in our largest market, the United States, where the spirits industry is subject to regulations that essentially mandate a so-called “three-tier system,” with a value chain that includes suppliers, distributors and retailers. Accordingly, we continue to provide information concerning fluctuations in distributor inventories. We believe such information is useful in understanding our performance and trends as it provides relevant information regarding customers’ demand for our products.
“Return on average invested capital.” This measure refers to the sum of net income and after-tax interest expense, divided by average invested capital. Average invested capital equals assets less liabilities, excluding interest-bearing debt, and is calculated using the average of the most recent 13 month-end balances. After-tax interest expense equals interest expense multiplied by one minus our effective tax rate. We use this non-GAAP measure because we consider it to be a meaningful indicator of how effectively and efficiently we invest capital in our business.
Definitions
Aggregations.
From time to time, to explain our results of operations or to highlight trends and uncertainties affecting our business, we aggregate markets according to stage of economic development as defined by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and we aggregate brands by beverage alcohol category. Below, we define the geographic and brand aggregations used in this report.
Geographic Aggregations.
In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2022 Market Highlights,” we provide supplemental information for our largest markets ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2022 net sales. In addition to markets listed by country name, we include the following aggregations:
31
•“Developed International” markets are “advanced economies” as defined by the IMF, excluding the United States. In fiscal 2022, our largest developed international markets were Germany, Australia, the United Kingdom, and France. This aggregation represents our net sales of branded products to these markets.
•“Emerging” markets are “emerging and developing economies” as defined by the IMF. In fiscal 2022, our largest emerging markets were Mexico, Poland, Brazil, Russia, and Chile. This aggregation represents our net sales of branded products to these markets.
•“Travel Retail” represents our net sales of branded products to global duty-free customers, other travel retail customers, and the U.S. military, regardless of customer location.
•“Non-branded and bulk” includes our net sales of used barrels, contract bottling, and bulk whiskey and wine, regardless of customer location.
Brand Aggregations.
In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2022 Brand Highlights,” we provide supplemental information for our largest brands ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2022 net sales. In addition to brands listed by name, we include the following aggregations:
•“Whiskey” includes all whiskey spirits and whiskey-based flavored liqueurs, ready-to-drink (RTD), and ready-to-pour products (RTP). The brands included in this category are the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, the Woodford Reserve family of brands (Woodford Reserve), the Old Forester family of brands (Old Forester), GlenDronach, Benriach, Glenglassaugh, Slane Irish Whiskey, and Coopers’ Craft.
•“American whiskey” includes the Jack Daniel’s family of brands and premium bourbons (defined below).
•“Jack Daniel's family of brands” includes Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey (JDTW), Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP products (JD RTD/RTP), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey (JDTH), Gentleman Jack, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire (JDTF), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Apple (JDTA), Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection (JDSB), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye Whiskey (JDTR), Jack Daniel’s Sinatra Select, Jack Daniel’s Bonded, Jack Daniel’s No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey, Jack Daniel’s Bottled-in-Bond, Jack Daniel’s 10 Year Old, and Jack Daniel’s Triple Mash.
•“Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP” products include all RTD line extensions of Jack Daniel’s, such as Jack Daniel’s & Cola, Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktails, Jack Daniel’s Double Jack, and other malt- and spirit-based Jack Daniel’s RTDs along with Jack Daniel’s Winter Jack RTP.
•“Premium bourbons” includes Woodford Reserve, Old Forester, and Coopers’ Craft.
•“Super-premium American whiskey” includes Woodford Reserve, Gentleman Jack, and other super-premium Jack Daniel's expressions.
•“Tequila” includes the Herradura family of brands (Herradura), el Jimador, New Mix, and other tequilas.
•“Wine” includes Korbel Champagnes and Sonoma-Cutrer wines.
•“Vodka” includes Finlandia.
•“Non-branded and bulk” includes our net sales of used barrels, contract bottling, and bulk whiskey and wine.
Other Metrics.
•“Shipments.” We generally record revenues when we ship or deliver our products to our customers. In this report, unless otherwise specified, we refer to shipments when discussing volume.
•“Depletions.” This is a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol industry to describe volume. Depending on the context, depletions usually means either (a) where Brown-Forman is the distributor, shipments directly to retail or wholesale customers or (b) where Brown-Forman is not the distributor, shipments from distributor customers to retailers and wholesalers. We believe that depletions measure volume in a way that more closely reflects consumer demand than our shipments to distributor customers do.
•“Consumer takeaway.” When discussing trends in the market, we refer to consumer takeaway, a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol industry that refers to the purchase of product by consumers from retail outlets, including products purchased through e-commerce channels, as measured by volume or retail sales value. This information is provided by
32
third parties, such as Nielsen and the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association (NABCA). Our estimates of market share or changes in market share are derived from consumer takeaway data using the retail sales value metric. We believe consumer takeaway is a leading indicator of consumer demand trends.
•“Estimated net change in distributor inventories.” We generally recognize revenue when our products are shipped or delivered to customers. In the United States and certain other markets, our customers are distributors that sell downstream to retailers and consumers. We believe that our distributors’ downstream sales more closely reflect actual consumer demand than do our shipments to distributors. Our shipments increase distributors’ inventories, while distributors’ depletions (as described above) reduce their inventories. Therefore, it is possible that our shipments do not coincide with distributors’ downstream depletions and merely reflect changes in distributors’ inventories. Because changes in distributors’ inventories could affect our trends, we believe it is useful for investors to understand those changes in the context of our operating results.
We perform the following calculation to determine the “estimated net change in distributor inventories”:
•For both the current-year period and the comparable prior-year period, we calculate a “depletion-based” amount by (a) dividing the organic dollar amount (e.g. organic net sales) by the corresponding shipment volumes to arrive at a shipment per case amount, and (b) multiplying the resulting shipment per case amount by the corresponding depletion volumes. We subtract the year-over-year percentage change of the “depletion-based” amount from the year-over-year percentage change of the organic amount to calculate the “estimated net change in distributor inventories.”
•A positive difference is interpreted as a net increase in distributors’ inventories, which implies that organic trends could decrease as distributors’ reduce inventories; whereas, a negative difference is interpreted as a net decrease in distributors’ inventories, which implies that organic trends could increase as distributors rebuild inventories.
33
Significant Developments
Below we discuss the significant developments in our business during fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022. These developments relate to the COVID-19 pandemic (COVID-19), supply chain disruptions, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, innovation, and capital deployment.
COVID-19
We experienced strong, broad-based reported net sales growth across all of our geographic clusters and Travel Retail channel due to the gradual re-opening of the on-premise channel, some degree of travel and tourism returning, and growing premiumization trends. While the financial impact of COVID-19 on our business is difficult to measure, we believe the timing and pace of global vaccination rates, governmental actions to lower or eliminate restrictions in certain economies around the world, and the post-pandemic economic recovery positively impacted our results when compared to the same prior-year period. We further discuss the effect of COVID-19 on our results where relevant below.
Supply Chain Disruptions
Our results were negatively impacted by supply chain disruptions, largely related to glass supply. These disruptions curtailed our ability to fully meet demand and therefore negatively affected our net sales. Additionally, we incurred higher input and transportation costs due to the supply chain disruptions. We further discuss the effect of supply chain disruptions on our results where relevant below.
Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, had a negative effect on our fiscal 2022 operating results. The most significant effect was the $52 million non-cash impairment charge for our Finlandia brand name (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information), which reflects a decline in our long-term outlook for Finlandia due to the suspension of operations in Russia, a key market for the brand. Additionally, operating income was negatively affected by other items attributable to the conflict such as (a) the suspension of our commercial operations in Russia and our diminished ability to conduct business in Ukraine, (b) bad debt expense, (c) inventory write-offs, and (d) severance expense. These negative effects were partially offset by the gain on terminated Russian ruble hedge contracts.
Although reported net sales were negatively affected by the suspension of our commercial operations in Russia and our diminished ability to conduct business in Ukraine as a result of the conflict, the overall impact was not material to our consolidated full-year reported net sales growth rate, because (a) Russia and Ukraine represent a small share of total reported net sales and (b) the impact occurred in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. Prior to the onset of the conflict, Russia and Ukraine represented approximately 2% of our reported net sales. We expect the conflict to have a more significant negative effect on our fiscal 2023 reported net sales results, reflecting a full-year impact of the suspension of commercial operations in Russia, and the ongoing disruption of our business in Ukraine. We further discuss the effect of the conflict on our fiscal 2022 results where relevant below.
Innovation
•Jack Daniel’s family of brands. Innovation within the Jack Daniel’s family of brands has contributed to our growth in the last two years as described below.
◦In fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022, we continued the international launch of Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Apple, expanding to certain developed international and emerging markets.
◦In fiscal 2021, we introduced new spirit-based RTD products in the United States.
◦In fiscal 2022, we launched Jack Daniel’s 10 Year Old in the United States.
•Tequila brands. Tequila continues to be an attractive category, particularly in the United States, with both Herradura and el Jimador contributing significantly to our overall net sales growth. In fiscal 2021, we introduced Herradura Legend in the United States.
Capital Deployment
•We have focused our capital deployment initiatives on (a) ensuring adequate liquidity and flexibility during the COVID-19 pandemic, (b) fully investing in our existing business, (c) continued execution of our acquisitions and divestitures strategy, and (d) returning cash to our stockholders through regular and special dividends.
34
•Investments. During fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022, our capital expenditures totaled $200 million and focused on enabling the growth of our premium whiskey brands:
◦During fiscal 2021, a $125 million capital investment was approved by our Board of Directors to expand our bourbon-making capacity in Kentucky to meet anticipated future consumer demand.
◦During fiscal 2022, a $50 million capital investment was approved by our Board of Directors to expand our scotch-making capacity to meet anticipated future consumer demand.
◦To support the continued growth of JDTW, we built an additional barrel warehouse at our Jack Daniel’s distillery during fiscal 2022.
•Acquisitions and divestitures. During fiscal 2021, we sold our Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood brands and related assets. Also in fiscal 2021, we acquired Part Time Rangers Holdings Limited, which owns Part Time Rangers RTDs. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
•Cash returned to stockholders. During fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022, we returned $1.2 billion to our stockholders through regular and special dividends.
35
Executive Summary
Fiscal 2022 Highlights
•We delivered reported net sales of $3.9 billion, an increase of 14% compared to fiscal 2021. Reported net sales growth was driven by higher volumes and favorable price/mix, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange and the effect of acquisitions and divestitures. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales. Organic net sales increased 17% compared to fiscal 2021.
◦From a brand perspective, reported net sales growth was driven by JDTW, our tequilas, and premium bourbons.
◦From a geographic perspective, the United States, emerging markets, developed international markets, and the Travel Retail channel all contributed significantly to reported net sales growth.
Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•We delivered reported operating income of $1.2 billion, an increase of 3% compared to fiscal 2021. The increase in reported operating income was driven by reported net sales growth and the absence of the $20 million commitment to the Foundation in fiscal 2021, partially offset by (a) the effect of acquisitions and divestitures (primarily the fiscal 2021 gain on sale of Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood), (b) impairment charges, and (c) the negative effect of foreign exchange. Organic operating income increased 27% compared to fiscal 2021.
•We delivered diluted earnings per share of $1.74, a decrease of 7% compared to fiscal 2021, due to higher income taxes, partially offset by an increase in reported operating income. Earnings per share in fiscal 2021 included an estimated $0.20 per share benefit from the gain on sale of Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood and related assets.
•Our return on average invested capital decreased to 17.7% in fiscal 2022, compared to 19.6% in fiscal 2021, driven primarily by higher income taxes. Return on average invested capital in fiscal 2021 benefited from the gain on sale of Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood and related assets.
36
Summary of Operating Performance Fiscal 2021 and Fiscal 2022
2021 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal year ended April 30 | 2021 | 2022 | Reported Change | Organic Change1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 3,461 | $ | 3,933 | 14 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||||||||
Cost of sales | $ | 1,367 | $ | 1,542 | 13 | % | 18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 2,094 | $ | 2,391 | 14 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||||||||
Advertising | $ | 399 | $ | 438 | 10 | % | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||
SG&A | $ | 671 | $ | 690 | 3 | % | 7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of business | $ | (127) | $ | — | nm | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net | $ | (15) | $ | 59 | nm | nm | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 1,166 | $ | 1,204 | 3 | % | 27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses2 | $ | 1,055 | $ | 1,187 | 13 | % | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||
As a percentage of net sales3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 60.5 | % | 60.8 | % | 0.3 | pp | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 33.7 | % | 30.6 | % | (3.1 | pp) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | $ | 79 | $ | 77 | (4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate | 16.5 | % | 24.8 | % | 8.3 | pp | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.74 | (7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||
Return on average invested capital1 | 19.6 % | 17.7 | % | (1.9 | pp) |
1See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “organic change” and “return on average invested capital,” including how we calculate these measures and why we think this information is useful to readers.
2Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.
3Year-over-year changes in percentages are reported in percentage points (pp).
37
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2022 Market Highlights
The following table shows net sales results for our largest markets, summarized by geographic area, for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021. We discuss results of the markets most affecting our performance below the table.
Top Markets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales % Change vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geographic area1 | % of Fiscal 2022 Net Sales | Reported | Acquisitions and Divestitures | Foreign Exchange | Organic2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
United States | 49 | % | 10 | % | 2 | % | — | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Developed International | 29 | % | 12 | % | — | % | 4 | % | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Germany | 6 | % | 11 | % | — | % | 3 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Australia | 6 | % | 5 | % | — | % | 2 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 6 | % | 7 | % | — | % | 9 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
France | 4 | % | (1 | %) | — | % | 3 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Rest of Developed International | 8 | % | 32 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % | 37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Emerging | 18 | % | 24 | % | — | % | 5 | % | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Mexico | 5 | % | 19 | % | — | % | (4 | %) | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Poland | 3 | % | 9 | % | — | % | 4 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Brazil | 2 | % | 22 | % | — | % | (1 | %) | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Russia | 1 | % | 7 | % | — | % | 6 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Chile | 1 | % | 64 | % | — | % | — | % | 64 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Rest of Emerging | 7 | % | 34 | % | — | % | 15 | % | 49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Travel Retail | 3 | % | 65 | % | 2 | % | 1 | % | 67 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-branded and bulk | 2 | % | 6 | % | 18 | % | 1 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 100 | % | 14 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Note: Results may differ due to rounding |
1See “Definitions” above for definitions of market aggregations presented here.
2See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “organic change” in net sales, including how we calculate this measure and why we believe this information is useful to readers.
Reported net sales for some of the markets discussed below were positively impacted by comparisons against COVID-19-related declines during fiscal 2021. See “Significant Developments - COVID-19” above for more information on the impact of COVID-19 on our results.
The United States, our most important market, grew reported net sales 10%, led by (a) JDTW, fueled by higher volumes and a favorable channel mix shift to the on-premise channel; (b) our premium bourbons, due to higher volumes and prices of Woodford Reserve and Old Forester; (c) our tequilas, driven by higher volumes of Herradura and el Jimador; and (d) volumetric growth of Sonoma-Cutrer. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales. This growth was partially offset by the effect of acquisitions and divestitures along with lower volumes of JDTH. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
Developed International
•Germany’s reported net sales increased 11%, fueled by volumetric gains of JDTW and JD RTDs, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange.
•Australia’s reported net sales increased 5%, driven primarily by higher pricing of JD RTDs, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange.
38
•The United Kingdom’s reported net sales increased 7%, led by volumetric growth of JDTW, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•Reported net sales in the Rest of Developed International increased 32%, fueled by JDTW growth in Spain, Japan, and Korea, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
Emerging
•Mexico’s reported net sales increased 19%, driven by broad-based growth across our portfolio of brands, led by Herradura and JDTW, along with the positive effect of foreign exchange. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•Poland’s reported net sales increased 9%, led by JDTW and Finlandia, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•Brazil’s reported net sales increased 22%, fueled by the launch of JDTA, favorable price/mix of JDTW, and higher volumes of JDTH. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•Russia’s reported net sales increased 7%, led by the launch of JDTA and higher pricing of Finlandia, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange. Our fiscal 2022 reported net sales were adversely impacted by the suspension of our commercial operations in Russia due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Our fiscal 2023 outlook reflects the expected impact of a full-year suspension of our commercial operations in Russia.
•Chile’s reported net sales increased 64%, driven by broad-based growth across much of our portfolio, led by higher volumes of JDTW and the launch of JDTA. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•Reported net sales in the Rest of Emerging increased 34%, driven primarily by JDTW gains, led by Turkey, Romania, and the United Arab Emirates. This growth was partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange (reflecting the strengthening of the dollar primarily against the Turkish lira). An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales.
Travel Retail reported net sales increased 65%, fueled by higher volumes across much of our portfolio, led by JDTW, as we cycled against significant declines during the same prior-year period, partially offset by unfavorable price/mix.
Non-branded and bulk reported net sales increased 6%, driven by higher volumes for used barrels.
39
Fiscal 2022 Brand Highlights
The following table highlights the global results of our largest brands for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021. We discuss results of the brands most affecting our performance below the table.
Major Brands | |||||||||||||||||
Net Sales % Change vs. 2021 | |||||||||||||||||
Product category / brand family / brand1 | Reported | Acquisitions & Divestitures | Foreign Exchange | Organic2 | |||||||||||||
Whiskey | 13 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | 18 | % | |||||||||
Jack Daniel’s family of brands | 15 | % | — | % | 3 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||
JDTW | 20 | % | — | % | 4 | % | 23 | % | |||||||||
JD RTD/RTP | 6 | % | — | % | 1 | % | 7 | % | |||||||||
JDTH | — | % | — | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||
Gentleman Jack | (3 | %) | — | % | 2 | % | — | % | |||||||||
JDTF | 16 | % | — | % | (2 | %) | 13 | % | |||||||||
JDTA | 44 | % | — | % | 2 | % | 46 | % | |||||||||
Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands | 17 | % | — | % | 2 | % | 19 | % | |||||||||
Woodford Reserve | 16 | % | — | % | — | % | 16 | % | |||||||||
Rest of Whiskey | (10 | %) | 37 | % | 1 | % | 28 | % | |||||||||
Tequila | 22 | % | — | % | (2 | %) | 20 | % | |||||||||
Herradura | 29 | % | — | % | (1 | %) | 28 | % | |||||||||
el Jimador | 27 | % | — | % | (1 | %) | 27 | % | |||||||||
Rest of Tequila | 6 | % | — | % | (3 | %) | 3 | % | |||||||||
Wine | 6 | % | — | % | — | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
Vodka (Finlandia) | 21 | % | — | % | 2 | % | 23 | % | |||||||||
Rest of Portfolio | 10 | % | (2 | %) | 14 | % | 22 | % | |||||||||
Non-branded and bulk | 6 | % | 18 | % | 1 | % | 25 | % | |||||||||
Note: Results may differ due to rounding |
1See “Definitions” above for definitions of brand aggregations and volume measures presented here.
2See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “organic change” in net sales, including how we calculate this measure and why we believe this information is useful to readers.
Reported net sales for some of the brands discussed below were positively impacted by comparisons against COVID-19-related declines during fiscal 2021. See “Significant Developments - COVID-19” above for more information on the impact of COVID-19 on our results.
Whiskey
•The Jack Daniel's family of brands grew reported net sales 15%, driven by the broad-based growth of JDTW.
•JDTW generates a significant percentage of our total net sales and is our top priority. Reported net sales increased 20%, driven by (a) broad-based volume growth in the United States, developed international markets, and emerging markets; and (b) a favorable channel mix shift to the on-premise. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales. This growth was partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•Jack Daniel's RTD/RTP grew reported net sales 6%, driven primarily by Australia and Germany.
•Reported net sales for JDTH were flat, as broad-based gains in our international markets were offset by declines in the United States and the negative effect of foreign exchange. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
40
•JDTF grew reported net sales 16%, led by growth in emerging markets along with the positive effect of foreign exchange. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•JDTA grew reported net sales 44%, fueled by the continued international launch in our emerging markets, most notably in Chile and Brazil, along with volumetric gains in the United States. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales.
•Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands grew reported net sales 17%, largely driven by higher volumes in the United States reflecting the April 2022 inventory build in advance of the launch of Jack Daniel’s Bonded and Jack Daniel’s Triple Mash.
•Woodford Reserve’s reported net sales increased 16%, fueled by higher volumes and prices in the United States along with volumetric gains in Travel Retail. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results.
•Rest of Whiskey reported net sales declined 10% due to the effect of acquisitions and divestitures, partially offset by growth of Old Forester, BenRiach, and GlenDronach. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales.
Tequila
•Herradura’s reported net sales increased 29%, fueled by growth in the United States and Mexico.
•el Jimador’s reported net sales increased 27%, driven by broad-based volume growth led by the United States, Colombia, and Mexico.
Wine reported net sales increased 6%, driven primarily by higher volumes of Sonoma-Cutrer due to the reopening of the on-premise channel in the United States. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales.
Vodka (Finlandia) reported net sales increased 21% led by broad-based growth in emerging markets. Russia and Ukraine are key markets for Finlandia. Our fiscal 2023 outlook reflects the expected impact of a full-year suspension of our commercial operations in Russia and the ongoing impact on our ability to conduct business in Ukraine.
Rest of Portfolio reported net sales increased 10%, largely driven by the growth of Chambord in the United Kingdom and United States, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange.
Non-branded and bulk. See discussion for this aggregation in “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2022 Market Highlights” above.
41
Year-Over-Year Comparisons
Commentary below compares fiscal 2022 to fiscal 2021 results. A comparison of fiscal 2021 to fiscal 2020 results may be found in “Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2021 (2021 Form 10-K).
Reported net sales for some markets and brands were positively impacted by comparisons against COVID-19-related declines during fiscal 2021. See “Significant Developments - COVID-19” above for more information.
Net Sales | |||||||||||
2022 | |||||||||||
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 30 | Volume | Price/mix | Total | ||||||||
Change in reported net sales | 7 | % | 7 | % | 14 | % | |||||
Acquisitions and divestitures | 3 | % | (1 | %) | 2 | % | |||||
Foreign exchange | — | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||
Change in organic net sales | 9 | % | 8 | % | 17 | % | |||||
Note: Results may differ due to rounding |
Reported net sales of $3.9 billion increased 14%, or $472 million, in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021. Reported net sales growth was driven by higher volumes and favorable price/mix, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange and the effect of acquisitions and divestitures. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories positively impacted reported net sales. Volume growth was driven by the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, led by JDTW, JD RTDs, and JDTA. Favorable price/mix was driven by faster growth from our higher-priced brands, led by JDTW, and a favorable channel mix shift due to the continued re-opening of the on-premise channel. Supply chain disruptions had an adverse effect on results. See “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2022 Market Highlights” and “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2022 Brand Highlights” above for details on the factors contributing to the change in reported net sales for fiscal 2022.
Cost of Sales | |||||||||||
2022 | |||||||||||
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 30 | Volume | Cost/mix | Total | ||||||||
Change in reported cost of sales | 7 | % | 6 | % | 13 | % | |||||
Acquisitions and divestitures | 3 | % | 1 | % | 3 | % | |||||
Foreign exchange | — | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||
Change in organic cost of sales | 9 | % | 8 | % | 18 | % | |||||
Note: Results may differ due to rounding |
Reported cost of sales of $1.5 billion increased $175 million, or 13%, in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021. The increase was driven by higher volumes and unfavorable cost/mix, partially offset by the effect of acquisitions and divestitures and the positive effect of foreign exchange. An estimated net increase in distributor inventories negatively impacted reported cost of sales. Volume growth was driven by the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, led by JDTW, JD RTDs, and JDTA. Unfavorable cost/mix reflects (a) a shift in portfolio mix toward our higher-cost brands, (b) higher costs related to supply chain disruptions, (c) higher input costs related to grain and agave, and (d) inventory write-offs attributable to the impacts of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
42
Gross Profit | |||||
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 30 | 2022 | ||||
Change in reported gross profit | 14 | % | |||
Acquisitions and divestitures | 1 | % | |||
Foreign exchange | 3 | % | |||
Change in organic gross profit | 17 | % | |||
Note: Results may differ due to rounding |
Gross Margin | |||||
Fiscal year ended April 30 | 2022 | ||||
Prior year gross margin | 60.5 | % | |||
Price/mix | 1.3 | % | |||
Cost/mix | (1.3 | %) | |||
Acquisitions and divestitures | 0.5 | % | |||
Foreign exchange | (0.2 | %) | |||
Change in gross margin | 0.3 | % | |||
Current year gross margin | 60.8 | % | |||
Note: Results may differ due to rounding |
Reported gross profit of $2.4 billion increased $297 million, or 14%, in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021. Gross margin increased to 60.8% in fiscal 2022, up 0.3 percentage points from 60.5% in fiscal 2021. The increase in gross margin was driven primarily by favorable price/mix and the effect of acquisitions and divestitures, largely offset by unfavorable cost/mix.
Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 30 | |||||||||||||||||
2022 | Reported | Foundation | Impairment | Foreign Exchange | Organic | ||||||||||||
Advertising | 10 | % | — | % | — | % | 2 | % | 11 | % | |||||||
SG&A | 3 | % | 3 | % | — | % | 1 | % | 7 | % | |||||||
Total operating expenses1 | 13 | % | 2 | % | (6 | %) | (1 | %) | 8 | % | |||||||
Note: Results may differ due to rounding |
1Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.
Reported operating expenses totaled $1.2 billion and increased $132 million, or 13%, in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021.
•Reported advertising expenses increased 10% in fiscal 2022, driven primarily by higher spend in our developed international and emerging markets to support JDTW and the continued launch of JDTA.
•Reported SG&A expenses increased 3% in fiscal 2022, driven primarily by (a) comparison to lower discretionary spend during fiscal 2021 due to COVID-19, (b) higher compensation and benefit-related expenses, and (c) expenses attributable to the impacts of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This increase in spend was partially offset by the absence of the $20 million commitment to the Foundation in fiscal 2021 and the positive effect of foreign exchange.
43
Operating Income | |||||
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 30 | 2022 | ||||
Change in reported operating income | 3 | % | |||
Acquisitions and divestitures | 14 | % | |||
Foundation | (2 | %) | |||
Impairment charges | 6 | % | |||
Foreign exchange | 6 | % | |||
Change in organic operating income | 27 | % | |||
Note: Results may differ due to rounding |
Reported operating income was $1.2 billion in fiscal 2022, an increase of $38 million, or 3%, compared to fiscal 2021. Operating margin declined 3.1 percentage points to 30.6% in fiscal 2022 from 33.7% in fiscal 2021 driven by (a) the effect of acquisitions and divestitures (primarily the fiscal 2021 gain on sale of Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood and related assets), (b) unfavorable cost/mix, (c) impairment charges (primarily the non-cash impairment charge for our Finlandia brand name), and (d) the negative effect of foreign exchange. These factors were partially offset by (a) favorable price/mix, (b) operating expense (excluding impairment charges) leverage, and (c) the absence of the $20 million commitment to the Foundation in fiscal 2021.
Interest expense (net) decreased $2 million, or 4%, in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021, due to higher interest income driven by higher interest rates on our interest-bearing investments.
Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2022 was 24.8% compared to 16.5% in fiscal 2021. The increase in our effective tax rate was driven primarily by (a) the absence of a deferred tax benefit recognized in the prior-year related to an intercompany transfer of assets, (b) the impact of prior intercompany sales of inventory taxed at rates higher than current statutory tax rates, (c) increased expense from true-ups of prior-year tax liabilities, tax rate changes and other permanent differences; and (d) decreased benefit from stock-based compensation. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details.
Diluted earnings per share were $1.74 in fiscal 2022, a decrease of 7% compared to fiscal 2021 due to higher income taxes, partially offset by an increase in reported operating income. Earnings per share in fiscal 2021 included an estimated $0.20 per share benefit from the gain on sale of Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood and related assets.
Fiscal 2023 Outlook
Below we discuss our outlook for fiscal 2023 which reflects the trends, developments, and uncertainties, including those described above, we expect to affect our business. When we provide guidance for organic change in certain measures of the statements of operations we do not provide guidance for the corresponding GAAP change because the GAAP measure will include items that are difficult to quantify or predict with reasonable certainty, such as foreign exchange, which could have a significant impact to our GAAP income statement measures.
The company anticipates continued growth in fiscal 2023 despite global macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties. Accordingly, we expect the following in fiscal 2023:
•Reflecting the strength of our portfolio of brands and strong consumer demand, we expect organic net sales growth in the mid-single digit range.
•Considering the net effect of inflation and the removal of the European Union and United Kingdom tariffs on American whiskey, we project reported gross margin to increase slightly.
•Based on the above expectations, we anticipate mid-single digit organic operating income growth.
•We expect our fiscal 2023 effective tax rate to be in the range of approximately 22% to 23%.
•Capital expenditures are planned to be in the range of $190 to $210 million.
44
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We generate strong cash flows from operations, which enable us to meet current obligations, fund capital expenditures, and return cash to our stockholders through regular dividends and, from time to time, through share repurchases and special dividends. We believe our investment-grade credit ratings (A1 by Moody's and A- by Standard & Poor's) provide us with financial flexibility when accessing global debt capital markets and allow us to reserve adequate debt capacity for investment opportunities and unforeseen events.
Our cash flow from operations is supplemented by our cash and cash equivalent balances, as well as access to other liquidity sources. Cash and cash equivalents were $1,150 million at April 30, 2021, and $868 million at April 30, 2022. As of April 30, 2022, approximately 71% of our cash and cash equivalents were held by our foreign subsidiaries whose earnings we expect to reinvest indefinitely outside of the United States. We continue to evaluate our future cash deployment and may decide to repatriate additional cash held by our foreign subsidiaries, which may require us to provide for and pay additional taxes.
We have an $800 million commercial paper program that we use, together with our cash flow from operations, to fund our short-term operational needs. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for outstanding commercial paper balances, interest rates, and days to maturity at April 30, 2021 and April 30, 2022. The average balances, interest rates, and original maturities during the periods ended April 30, 2021 and 2022, are presented below.
(Amounts in millions) | Three Months Average | Fiscal Year Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, | April 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average commercial paper | $ | 259 | $ | — | $ | 321 | $ | 59 | |||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.23 | % | — | % | 0.49 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||||
Average days to maturity at issuance | 72 | 0 | 116 | 32 |
Our commercial paper program is supported by available commitments under our $800 million bank credit facility. The credit facility, which was extended for an additional year in November 2021, is scheduled to expire in November 2024. At April 30, 2022, there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility. Although unlikely, under extreme market conditions, one or more participating banks may not be able to fund its commitments under our credit facility. To manage this counterparty credit risk, we partner with banks that have investment grade credit ratings, limit the amount of exposure we have with each bank, and monitor the financial conditions of each bank.
Our most significant short-term cash requirements relate primarily to funding our operations (such as expenditures for raw materials, production and distribution, advertising and promotion, and current taxes), repayment of our note maturing in 2023, and capital investments. Our most significant longer-term cash requirements primarily include payments related to our long-term debt, employee benefit obligations, and deferred tax liabilities (see Notes 6, 9 and 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
While we expect to meet our planned short-term liquidity needs largely through cash generated from operations and borrowings under our commercial paper program, a sustained market deterioration resulting in declines in net sales and profit could require us to evaluate alternative sources of liquidity. If we have additional liquidity needs, we believe that we could access financing in the debt capital markets.
We believe our current liquidity position, supplemented by our ability to generate positive cash flows from operations in the future, and our ample debt capacity enabled by our strong short-term and long-term credit ratings, will be sufficient to meet all of our expected future financial commitments.
45
Cash Flow Summary
The following table summarizes our cash flows for each of the last two years:
(Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 817 | $ | 936 | ||||||||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of business | $ | 177 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Acquisition of business | (14) | — | ||||||||||||
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | (62) | (138) | ||||||||||||
Other | (3) | 11 | ||||||||||||
Net cash flows from investing activities | $ | 98 | $ | (127) | ||||||||||
Financing activities: | ||||||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings | $ | (126) | $ | (196) | ||||||||||
Regular dividend payments | (338) | (352) | ||||||||||||
Special dividend payment | — | (479) | ||||||||||||
Other | (21) | (11) | ||||||||||||
Net cash flows from financing activities | $ | (485) | $ | (1,038) | ||||||||||
Cash provided by operations of $936 million increased $119 million from fiscal 2021, reflecting improved operating results and the impact of changes in working capital, which included the collection in December 2021 of approximately $62 million of accounts receivable from Bacardi that had been withheld since fiscal 2021. (See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details about the Bacardi matter.)
Cash flows from investing activities decreased $127 million during fiscal 2022, compared to an increase of $98 million during the prior year. The $225 million change largely reflects (a) the proceeds of $177 million received in the prior-year period from our divestiture of the Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood brands and related assets and (b) a $76 million increase in capital expenditures.
Cash used for financing activities was $1,038 million during fiscal 2022, compared to $485 million for fiscal 2021. The $553 million increase largely reflects a special cash dividend payment of $479 million in December 2021 and a $70 million increase in net repayments of short-term borrowings.
A discussion of our cash flows for fiscal 2021 compared to fiscal 2020 may be found in “Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2021.
Dividends
As announced in November 2021, our Board of Directors approved a 5% increase in the quarterly cash dividend on our Class A and Class B common stock to $0.1885 per share from $0.1795 per share, effective with the regular quarterly dividend paid on December 28, 2021. As a result, the indicated annual cash dividend increased from $0.7180 per share to $0.7540 per share. The Board also declared a special cash dividend of $1.00 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock, which was paid on December 29, 2021.
As announced on May 26, 2022, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend on our Class A and Class B common stock of $0.1885 per share. Stockholders of record on June 8, 2022, will receive the dividend on July 1, 2022.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements reflect some estimates involved in applying the following critical accounting policies that entail uncertainties and subjectivity. Using different estimates or policies could have a material effect on our operating results and financial condition.
46
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We have obtained most of our brands by acquiring other companies. When we acquire another company, we first allocate the purchase price to identifiable assets and liabilities, including intangible brand names and trademarks (“brand names”), based on estimated fair value. We then record any remaining purchase price as goodwill. We do not amortize goodwill or other intangible assets with indefinite lives. We consider all of our brand names to have indefinite lives.
We assess our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Goodwill is impaired when the carrying amount of the related reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case we write down the goodwill by the amount of the excess (limited to the carrying amount of the goodwill). We estimate the reporting unit's fair value using discounted estimated future cash flows or market information. Similarly, a brand name is impaired when its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case we write down the brand name to its estimated fair value. We estimate the fair value of a brand name using the “relief from royalty” method. We also consider market values for similar assets when available. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value, including making assumptions about future cash flows, net sales, discount rates, and royalty rates.
We have the option, before quantifying the fair value of a reporting unit or brand name, to evaluate qualitative factors to assess whether it is more likely than not that our goodwill or brand names are impaired. If we determine that is not the case, then we are not required to quantify the fair value. That assessment also takes considerable management judgment.
Based on our assumptions, we believe none of our goodwill or other intangibles are impaired as of April 30, 2022. Further, we estimate the fair values of goodwill and other intangible assets substantially exceed their carrying amounts, except for our Finlandia brand name. As of April 30, 2022, the carrying amount of the Finlandia brand name is $181 million.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $52 million for the Finlandia brand name. The impairment reflects a decline in our long-term outlook for Finlandia due to our suspension of operations in Russia, a key market for the brand. We determined Finlandia’s fair value based on the “relief from royalty” method, using current assumptions. Reasonably possible changes in those assumptions could result in additional non-cash impairment charges in the future. For example, we estimate that, all else equal, (a) a 15% decline in projected future net sales would result in an impairment charge of approximately $19 million or (b) a 1 percentage point increase in the discount rate would result in an impairment charge of approximately $29 million.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
We sponsor various defined benefit pension plans and postretirement plans providing retiree health care and retiree life insurance benefits. Benefits are based on factors such as years of service and compensation level during employment. We expense the benefits expected to be paid over employees' expected service. This requires us to make assumptions to determine the net benefit costs and obligations, such as discount rates, return on plan assets, the rate of salary increases, expected service, and health care cost trend rates. We review these assumptions annually and modify them based on current rates and trends when appropriate. The assumptions also reflect our historical experience and management's best judgment regarding future expectations. We believe the discount rates and expected return on plan assets are the most significant assumptions.
The discount rate used to measure the benefit obligations is determined at the beginning of each fiscal year using a yield curve based on the interest rates of high-quality debt securities with maturities corresponding to the expected timing of our benefit payments. The service cost and interest cost components are measured by applying the specific spot rates along that yield curve. The expected return on pension plan assets reflects expected capital market returns for each asset class that are based on historical returns, adjusted for the expected effects of diversification.
The following table compares the assumed discount rates and expected return on assets used in determining net periodic benefit cost for fiscal 2022 to those to be used in determining that cost for fiscal 2023.
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate for service cost | 3.36 | % | 4.44 | % | 3.49 | % | 4.50 | % | |||||||||||||||
Discount rate for interest cost | 2.24 | % | 3.97 | % | 2.27 | % | 3.96 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 6.25 | % | 6.25 | % | n/a | n/a |
Using these assumptions, we estimate our pension and other postretirement benefit cost for fiscal 2023 will be approximately $21 million, compared to $28 million (excluding settlement charges) for fiscal 2022. Decreasing/increasing the
47
assumed discount rates by 50 basis points would increase/decrease the total fiscal 2023 cost by approximately $6 million. Decreasing/increasing the assumed return on plan assets by 50 basis points would increase/decrease the total fiscal 2023 cost by approximately $4 million.
Income Taxes
Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions. We establish liabilities when some positions are likely to be challenged and may not succeed, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable. We adjust these liabilities in light of changing circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit. We believe current liabilities are appropriate for all known contingencies, but this situation could change.
Years can elapse before we can resolve a particular matter for which we may have established a tax liability. Although predicting the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter can be difficult, we believe our liabilities reflect the likely outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue could require use of our cash and increase our effective tax rate. Conversely, a favorable resolution could result in reduced cash tax payments, the reversal of previously established liabilities, or some combination of these results, which could reduce our effective tax rate.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risks
Our enterprise risk management process is intended to ensure that we take risks knowingly and thoughtfully and that we balance potential risks and rewards. Our integrated enterprise risk management framework is designed to identify, evaluate, communicate, and appropriately mitigate risks across our operations.
We face market risks arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates. We manage market risks through procurement strategies as well as the use of derivative and other financial instruments. Our risk management program is governed by policies that authorize and control the nature and scope of transactions that we use to mitigate market risks. Our policy permits the use of derivative financial instruments to mitigate market risks but prohibits their use for speculative purposes.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk. Foreign currency fluctuations affect our net investments in foreign subsidiaries and foreign currency-denominated cash flows. In general, we expect our cash flows to be negatively affected by a stronger dollar and positively affected by a weaker dollar. Our most significant foreign currency exposures include the euro, the British pound, and the Australian dollar. We manage our foreign currency exposures through derivative financial instruments, principally foreign currency forward contracts, and debt denominated in foreign currency. We had outstanding currency derivatives with notional amounts totaling $1,218 million and $801 million at April 30, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
We estimate that a hypothetical 10% weakening of the dollar compared to exchange rates of hedged currencies as of April 30, 2022, would decrease the fair value of our then-existing foreign currency derivative contracts by approximately $61 million. This hypothetical change in fair value does not consider the expected inverse change in the underlying foreign currency exposures.
Commodity price risk. Commodity price changes can affect our production and supply chain costs. Our most significant commodities exposures include wood, corn, agave, malted barley, rye, and natural gas. We manage certain exposures through forward purchase contracts.
Interest rate risk. Interest rate changes affect (a) the fair value of our fixed-rate debt, and (b) cash flows and earnings related to our variable-rate debt and interest-bearing investments. In addition to currently outstanding debt, any potential future debt offerings would be subject to interest rate risk.
As of April 30, 2022, our cash and cash equivalents ($868 million) were exposed to interest rate changes. Based on the then-existing balances of our interest-bearing investments, a hypothetical one percentage point increase in interest rates would result in a negligible decrease in net interest expense.
See Notes 13 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on our foreign currency exchange rate risk. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion of our pension and other postretirement plans' exposure to interest rate risks. Also see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for details on how economic conditions affecting market risks also affect the demand for and pricing of our products and how we are affected by exchange rate fluctuations.
48
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Table of Contents | |||||
Page | |||||
Reports of Management | |||||
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms (PCAOB ID 238 and 42) | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | |||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity | |||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |||||
49
Reports of Management
Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements
Our management is responsible for preparing, presenting, and ensuring the integrity of the financial information presented in this report. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, including amounts based on management’s best estimates and judgments. In management’s opinion, the consolidated financial statements fairly present the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, comprising only independent directors, meets regularly with our external auditors, the independent registered public accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP (EY); with our internal auditors; and with representatives of management to review accounting, internal control structure, and financial reporting matters. Our internal auditors and EY have full, free access to the Audit Committee. As set forth in our Code of Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines, we are firmly committed to adhering to the highest standards of moral and ethical behavior in our business activities.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
As of the end of our fiscal year, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of April 30, 2022. EY, which audited and reported on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2022, as stated in their report.
Dated: | June 17, 2022 | ||||||||||
By: | /s/ Lawson E. Whiting | ||||||||||
Lawson E. Whiting | |||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | |||||||||||
By: | /s/ Leanne D. Cunningham | ||||||||||
Leanne D. Cunningham | |||||||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
50
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Brown-Forman Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows of Brown-Forman Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the year ended April 30, 2020, including the related notes and schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts for the year ended April 30, 2020 appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
June 19, 2020
We served as the Company’s auditor from 1933 to 2020.
51
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Brown-Forman Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of April 30, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statement of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended April 30, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at April 30, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended April 30, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated June 17, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the account or disclosures to which it relates.
52
Valuation of Other Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives | ||||||||
Description of the Matter | At April 30, 2022, the balance of the Company’s other intangible assets with indefinite lives was $586 million. As discussed in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, other intangible assets with indefinite lives include intangible brand names and trademarks (“brand names”) and are assessed for impairment at least annually, or more frequently, if circumstances indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. As described in Note 4, during the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $52 million for its Finlandia brand name. The Company determined Finlandia’s fair value based on the relief from royalty method. Auditing management’s estimate of the fair value of brand names was complex due to the significant judgment required to determine the fair value of the brand names. The fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions used in the valuation process, such as future net sales. The estimate also includes assumptions such as discount rates and royalty rates. | |||||||
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls that address the risks of material misstatement over the Company’s process to estimate the fair value of other intangible assets with indefinite lives, including controls over management’s review of the selection of assumptions, described above, used in the valuation model. To test the estimated fair value of the Company’s brand names, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing methodologies used in the valuation model and testing the significant assumptions discussed above. This included comparing the significant assumptions used by management to observable market data, current industry and economic trends, changes in the Company’s business model and customer base, historical operating results and other relevant factors that would affect the significant assumptions. We assessed management’s historical estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the brand names that would result from changes in the assumptions. We also involved valuation specialists to assist in evaluating valuation methodologies and certain assumptions used in the models. |
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.
Louisville, Kentucky
June 17, 2022
53
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Brown-Forman Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of April 30, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended April 30, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) and our report dated June 17, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
June 17, 2022
54
Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Year Ended April 30, | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||
Sales | $ | 4,306 | $ | 4,526 | $ | 5,081 | |||||||||||
Excise taxes | 943 | 1,065 | 1,148 | ||||||||||||||
Net sales | 3,363 | 3,461 | 3,933 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 1,236 | 1,367 | 1,542 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 2,127 | 2,094 | 2,391 | ||||||||||||||
Advertising expenses | 383 | 399 | 438 | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 642 | 671 | 690 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of business | — | (127) | — | ||||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net | 11 | (15) | 59 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income | 1,091 | 1,166 | 1,204 | ||||||||||||||
Non-operating postretirement expense | 5 | 6 | 13 | ||||||||||||||
Interest income | (5) | (2) | (5) | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 82 | 81 | 82 | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 1,009 | 1,081 | 1,114 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes | 182 | 178 | 276 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 827 | $ | 903 | $ | 838 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share: | |||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.73 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 1.75 | |||||||||||
Diluted | $ | 1.72 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.74 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
55
Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in millions)
Year Ended April 30, | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 827 | $ | 903 | $ | 838 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | (94) | 123 | (60) | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge adjustments | 30 | (76) | 53 | ||||||||||||||
Postretirement benefits adjustments | (77) | 78 | 77 | ||||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | (141) | 125 | 70 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 686 | $ | 1,028 | $ | 908 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
56
Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions)
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,150 | $ | 868 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 753 | 813 | |||||||||
Inventories: | |||||||||||
Barreled whiskey | 1,101 | 1,155 | |||||||||
Finished goods | 323 | 312 | |||||||||
Work in process | 199 | 225 | |||||||||
Raw materials and supplies | 128 | 126 | |||||||||
Total inventories | 1,751 | 1,818 | |||||||||
Other current assets | 263 | 277 | |||||||||
Total current assets | 3,917 | 3,776 | |||||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net | 832 | 875 | |||||||||
Goodwill | 779 | 761 | |||||||||
Other intangible assets | 676 | 586 | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 70 | 74 | |||||||||
Other assets | 248 | 301 | |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 6,522 | $ | 6,373 | |||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 679 | $ | 703 | |||||||
Accrued income taxes | 34 | 81 | |||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 205 | — | |||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | — | 250 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities | 918 | 1,034 | |||||||||
Long-term debt | 2,354 | 2,019 | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 169 | 219 | |||||||||
Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits | 219 | 183 | |||||||||
Other liabilities | 206 | 181 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | 3,866 | 3,636 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||||||
Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||||||
Common stock: | |||||||||||
Class A, voting, $0.15 par value (170,000,000 shares authorized; 170,000,000 shares issued) | 25 | 25 | |||||||||
Class B, nonvoting, $0.15 par value (400,000,000 shares authorized; 314,532,000 shares issued) | 47 | 47 | |||||||||
Retained earnings | 3,243 | 3,242 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (422) | (352) | |||||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (5,803,000 and 5,511,000 shares in 2021 and 2022, respectively) | (237) | (225) | |||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 2,656 | 2,737 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 6,522 | $ | 6,373 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
57
Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in millions)
Year Ended April 30, | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 827 | $ | 903 | $ | 838 | |||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations: | |||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of business | — | (127) | — | ||||||||||||||
Asset impairment charges | 13 | — | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 74 | 77 | 79 | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 11 | 12 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) | 39 | (53) | (11) | ||||||||||||||
Other, net | 15 | (23) | 31 | ||||||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions and dispositions: | |||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | 12 | (150) | (77) | ||||||||||||||
Inventories | (203) | (37) | (93) | ||||||||||||||
Other current assets | (27) | 31 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (30) | 137 | 37 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued income taxes | 18 | 8 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
Other operating assets and liabilities | (25) | 39 | (6) | ||||||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities | 724 | 817 | 936 | ||||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of business | — | 177 | — | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | (22) | (14) | — | ||||||||||||||
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | (113) | (62) | (138) | ||||||||||||||
Other, net | (6) | (3) | 11 | ||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities | (141) | 98 | (127) | ||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from short-term borrowings, maturities greater than 90 days | — | 344 | — | ||||||||||||||
Repayments of short-term borrowings, maturities greater than 90 days | — | (516) | — | ||||||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings | 178 | 46 | (196) | ||||||||||||||
Payments of withholding taxes related to stock-based awards | (43) | (21) | (11) | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | (1) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | (325) | (338) | (831) | ||||||||||||||
Cash used for financing activities | (191) | (485) | (1,038) | ||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | (24) | 45 | (47) | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | 368 | 475 | (276) | ||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period | 307 | 675 | 1,150 | ||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents,and restricted cash at end of period | 675 | 1,150 | 874 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Restricted cash (included in other current assets) at end of period | — | — | (6) | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 675 | $ | 1,150 | $ | 868 | |||||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for: | |||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 83 | $ | 79 | $ | 80 | |||||||||||
Income taxes | $ | 143 | $ | 204 | $ | 226 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
58
Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Class A Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | AOCI | Treasury Stock | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 30, 2019 | $ | 25 | $ | 47 | $ | — | $ | 2,238 | $ | (363) | $ | (300) | $ | 1,647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of tax effects1 | 43 | (43) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 827 | 827 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | (141) | (141) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.6806 per share) | (325) | (325) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | (1) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 11 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued under compensation plans | 43 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans | (11) | (75) | (86) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 30, 2020 | 25 | 47 | — | 2,708 | (547) | (258) | 1,975 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 903 | 903 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | 125 | 125 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.7076 per share) | (338) | (338) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 12 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued under compensation plans | 21 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans | (12) | (30) | (42) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 30, 2021 | 25 | 47 | — | 3,243 | (422) | (237) | 2,656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 838 | 838 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | 70 | 70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($1.7360 per share) | (831) | (831) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 15 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued under compensation plans | 12 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans | (15) | (8) | (23) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 30, 2022 | $ | 25 | $ | 47 | $ | — | $ | 3,242 | $ | (352) | $ | (225) | $ | 2,737 |
1Reflects adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI), effective May 1, 2019.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
59
Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars and other currency amounts in millions, except per share data)
1. Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). We also apply the following accounting policies when preparing our consolidated financial statements:
Principles of consolidation. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. We eliminate all intercompany transactions.
Estimates. To prepare financial statements that conform with GAAP, our management must make informed estimates that affect how we report revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities, including contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include bank demand deposits and all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Accounts receivable. Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for expected credit losses (allowance for doubtful accounts). We determine the allowance using information such as customer credit history and financial condition, historical loss experience, and macroeconomic factors. We write off account balances against the allowance when we have exhausted our collection efforts. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $7 and $13 at April 30, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
Inventories. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Approximately 52% of our consolidated inventories are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) cost method, which we use for the majority of our U.S. inventories. We value the remainder of our inventories primarily using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method. FIFO cost approximates current replacement cost. If we had used the FIFO method for all inventories, they would have been $353 and $385 higher than reported at April 30, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
Because we age most of our whiskeys in barrels for three years or more, we bottle and sell only a portion of our whiskey inventory each year. Following industry practice, we classify all barreled whiskey as a current asset. We include warehousing, insurance, ad valorem taxes, and other carrying charges applicable to barreled whiskey in inventory costs.
We classify agave inventories, bulk tequila, bulk wine, and liquid in bottling tanks as work in process.
Property, plant, and equipment. We state property, plant, and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation. We calculate depreciation on a straight-line basis using our estimates of useful life, which are 20–40 years for buildings and improvements; 3–10 years for machinery, equipment, vehicles, furniture, and fixtures; and 3–7 years for capitalized software.
We assess our property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. When we do not expect to recover the carrying value of an asset (or asset group) through undiscounted future cash flows, we write it down to its estimated fair value. We determine fair value using discounted estimated future cash flows, considering market values for similar assets when available.
When we retire or dispose of property, plant, and equipment, we remove its cost and accumulated depreciation from our balance sheet and reflect any gain or loss in operating income. We expense the costs of repairing and maintaining our property, plant, and equipment as we incur them.
Goodwill and other intangible assets. We have obtained most of our brands by acquiring other companies. When we acquire another company, we first allocate the purchase price to identifiable assets and liabilities, including intangible brand names and trademarks (“brand names”), based on estimated fair value. We then record any remaining purchase price as goodwill. We do not amortize goodwill or other intangible assets with indefinite lives. We consider all of our brand names to have indefinite lives.
We assess our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Goodwill is impaired when the carrying amount of the related reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case we write down the goodwill by the amount of the excess (limited to the carrying amount of the goodwill). We estimate the reporting unit's fair value using discounted estimated future cash flows or market information. Similarly, a brand name is impaired when its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case we write down the brand name to its estimated fair value. We estimate the fair value of a brand name using the “relief from royalty” method. We also consider market values for similar assets when available. Considerable management judgment is
60
necessary to estimate fair value, including the selection of assumptions about future cash flows, net sales, discount rates, and royalty rates.
We have the option, before quantifying the fair value of a reporting unit or brand name, to evaluate qualitative factors to assess whether it is more likely than not that our goodwill or brand names are impaired. If we determine that is not the case, then we are not required to quantify the fair value. That assessment also takes considerable management judgment.
Revenue recognition. Our net sales predominantly reflect global sales of beverage alcohol consumer products. We sell these products under contracts with different types of customers, depending on the market. The customer is most often a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer.
Each contract typically includes a single performance obligation to transfer control of the products to the customer. Depending on the contract, control is transferred when the products are either shipped or delivered to the customer, at which point we recognize the transaction price for those products as net sales. The transaction price recognized at that point reflects our estimate of the consideration to be received in exchange for the products. The actual amount may ultimately differ due to the effect of various customer incentives and trade promotion activities. In making our estimates, we consider our historical experience and current expectations, as applicable. Subsequent adjustments recognized for changes in estimated transaction prices are typically not material.
Net sales exclude taxes we collect from customers that are imposed by various governments on our sales, and are reduced by payments to customers unless made in exchange for distinct goods or services with fair values approximating the payments. Net sales include any amounts we bill customers for shipping and handling activities related to the products. We recognize the cost of those activities in cost of sales during the same period in which we recognize the related net sales. Sales returns, which are permitted only in limited situations, are not material. Customer payment terms generally range from 30 to 90 days. There are no significant amounts of contract assets or liabilities.
Cost of sales. Cost of sales includes the costs of receiving, producing, inspecting, warehousing, insuring, and shipping goods sold during the period.
Advertising costs. We expense the production costs of advertising when the advertisements first take place. We expense all other advertising costs during the year in which the costs are incurred.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses include the costs associated with our sales force, administrative staff and facilities, and other expenses related to our non-manufacturing functions.
Stock-based compensation. We use stock-based awards as part of our incentive compensation for eligible employees and directors. We recognize the grant-date fair value of an award as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which typically corresponds to the vesting period for the award. Upon forfeiture of an award prior to vesting, we reverse any previously-recognized compensation expense related to that award. We classify stock-based compensation expense within selling, general, and administrative expenses.
As we recognize compensation expense for a stock-based award, we concurrently recognize a related deferred tax asset. The subsequent vesting or exercise of the award will generally result in an actual tax benefit that differs from the deferred tax asset that had been recorded. The excess (deficiency) of the actual tax benefit over (under) the previously recorded tax asset is recognized as income tax benefit (expense) on the date of vesting or exercise.
Income taxes. We base our annual provision for income taxes on the pre-tax income reflected in our consolidated statement of operations. We establish deferred tax liabilities or assets for temporary differences between GAAP and tax reporting bases and later adjust them to reflect changes in tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. We record a valuation allowance as necessary to reduce a deferred tax asset to the amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. We do not provide deferred income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that we expect to indefinitely reinvest. We record a deferred tax charge in prepaid taxes for the difference between GAAP and tax reporting bases with respect to the elimination of intercompany profit in ending inventory.
We assess our uncertain income tax positions in two steps. First, we evaluate whether the tax position will more likely than not, based on its technical merits, be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation. For a tax position that does not meet this first criterion, we recognize no tax benefit. For a tax position that does meet the first criterion, we recognize a tax benefit in an amount equal to the largest amount of benefit that we believe has more than a 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. We record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as income tax expense.
61
Foreign currency transactions and translation. We report all gains and losses from foreign currency transactions (those denominated in a currency other than the entity's functional currency) in current income. The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for most of our consolidated entities. The local currency is the functional currency for some of our consolidated foreign entities. We translate the financial statements of those foreign entities into U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date to translate assets and liabilities, and using the average exchange rate for the reporting period to translate income and expenses. We record the resulting translation adjustments in other comprehensive income (loss).
2. Balance Sheet Information
Supplemental information on our year-end balance sheets is as follows:
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||
Other current assets: | |||||||||||
Prepaid taxes | $ | 170 | $ | 155 | |||||||
Other | 93 | 122 | |||||||||
$ | 263 | $ | 277 | ||||||||
Property, plant, and equipment: | |||||||||||
Land | $ | 82 | $ | 86 | |||||||
Buildings | 659 | 660 | |||||||||
Equipment | 833 | 849 | |||||||||
Construction in process | 50 | 129 | |||||||||
1,624 | 1,724 | ||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 792 | 849 | |||||||||
$ | 832 | $ | 875 | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses: | |||||||||||
Accounts payable, trade | $ | 172 | $ | 218 | |||||||
Accrued expenses: | |||||||||||
Advertising, promotion, and discounts | 202 | 200 | |||||||||
Compensation and commissions | 96 | 99 | |||||||||
Excise and other non-income taxes | 70 | 74 | |||||||||
Other | 139 | 112 | |||||||||
507 | 485 | ||||||||||
$ | 679 | $ | 703 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | $ | (179) | $ | (239) | |||||||
Cash flow hedge adjustments | (16) | 37 | |||||||||
Postretirement benefits adjustments | (227) | (150) | |||||||||
$ | (422) | $ | (352) |
62
3. Earnings per Share
We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share further includes the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation awards. We calculate that dilutive effect using the “treasury stock method” (as defined by GAAP).
The following table presents information concerning basic and diluted earnings per share:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 827 | $ | 903 | $ | 838 | |||||||||||
Share data (in thousands): | |||||||||||||||||
Basic average common shares outstanding | 477,765 | 478,527 | 478,879 | ||||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards | 2,644 | 2,150 | 1,686 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted average common shares outstanding | 480,409 | 480,677 | 480,565 | ||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 1.73 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 1.75 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.72 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.74 |
We excluded common stock-based awards for approximately 301,000 shares, 234,000 shares, and 691,000 shares from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively, because they were not dilutive for those periods under the treasury stock method.
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table shows the changes in goodwill (which include no accumulated impairment losses) and other intangible assets over the past two years:
Goodwill | Other Intangible Assets | ||||||||||
Balance as of April 30, 2020 | $ | 756 | $ | 635 | |||||||
Sale of business (Note 12) | (4) | (1) | |||||||||
Acquisition of business (Note 12) | 8 | 8 | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 19 | 34 | |||||||||
Balance as of April 30, 2021 | 779 | 676 | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (18) | (38) | |||||||||
Impairment | — | (52) | |||||||||
Balance as of April 30, 2022 | $ | 761 | $ | 586 |
Our other intangible assets consist of trademarks and brand names, all with indefinite useful lives.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge for our Finlandia brand name. The impairment reflects a decline in our long-term outlook for Finlandia due to our suspension of operations in Russia, a key market for the brand. The impairment charge of $52 is included in “other expense (income), net” in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. As of April 30, 2022, the remaining carrying amount of the Finlandia brand name was $181.
63
5. Contingencies
We operate in a litigious environment, and we are sued in the normal course of business. Sometimes plaintiffs seek substantial damages. Significant judgment is required in predicting the outcome of these suits and claims, many of which take years to adjudicate. We accrue estimated costs for a contingency when we believe that a loss is probable and we can make a reasonable estimate of the loss, and then adjust the accrual as appropriate to reflect changes in facts and circumstances. We do not believe it is reasonably possible that these existing loss contingencies, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. No material accrued loss contingencies are recorded as of April 30, 2022.
In May 2019, we notified Bacardi Martini Ltd. (Bacardi) of our intention not to renew the terms of our United Kingdom (U.K.) Cost Sharing Agreement (the Agreement), which then expired according to its terms on April 30, 2020. Following delivery of our notice and upon expiration of the Agreement, Bacardi claimed that it was entitled to compensation under the principle of commercial agency in the U.K., as well as additional compensation for the winding up of business conducted under the Agreement and for remitting the associated funds owed to us. Based on that claim, which we disputed, Bacardi withheld over £50 owed to us (included in accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of April 30, 2021). The dispute was resolved in December 2021, with Bacardi remitting over £47 related to this matter.
6. Debt and Credit Facilities
Our long-term debt (net of unamortized discounts and issuance costs) consisted of:
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||
2.25% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2023 | $ | 249 | $ | 250 | |||||||
3.50% senior notes, $300 principal amount, due April 15, 2025 | 298 | 298 | |||||||||
1.20% senior notes, €300 principal amount, due July 7, 2026 | 362 | 315 | |||||||||
2.60% senior notes, £300 principal amount, due July 7, 2028 | 415 | 374 | |||||||||
4.00% senior notes, $300 principal amount, due April 15, 2038 | 294 | 295 | |||||||||
3.75% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2043 | 248 | 248 | |||||||||
4.50% senior notes, $500 principal amount, due July 15, 2045 | 488 | 489 | |||||||||
2,354 | 2,269 | ||||||||||
Less current portion | — | 250 | |||||||||
$ | 2,354 | $ | 2,019 |
Debt payments required over the next five fiscal years consist of $250 in 2023, $0 in 2024, $300 in 2025, $0 in 2026, $316 in 2027, and $1,427 after 2027.
The senior notes contain terms, events of default, and covenants customary of these types of unsecured securities, including limitations on the amount of secured debt we can issue.
Our short-term borrowings of $205 as of April 30, 2021, included $195 of borrowings under our commercial paper program. There were no borrowings under that program as of April 30, 2022.
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||
Commercial paper | $195 | $— | |||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.16% | —% | |||||||||
Average remaining days to maturity | 24 | 0 |
We have a committed revolving credit agreement with various U.S. and international banks for $800 that expires in November 2024. At April 30, 2022, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility.
64
7. Common Stock
The following table shows the change in outstanding common shares during each of the last three years:
(Shares in thousands) | Class A | Class B | Total | ||||||||||||||
Balance at April 30, 2019 | 168,999 | 308,173 | 477,172 | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | (13) | (3) | (16) | ||||||||||||||
Stock issued under compensation plans | 54 | 999 | 1,053 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at April 30, 2020 | 169,040 | 309,169 | 478,209 | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Stock issued under compensation plans | 70 | 450 | 520 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at April 30, 2021 | 169,110 | 309,619 | 478,729 | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Stock issued under compensation plans | 65 | 226 | 291 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at April 30, 2022 | 169,175 | 309,845 | 479,020 |
8. Net Sales
The following table shows our net sales by geography:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
United States | $ | 1,690 | $ | 1,748 | $ | 1,917 | |||||||||||
Developed International1 | 901 | 1,014 | 1,137 | ||||||||||||||
Emerging2 | 572 | 578 | 714 | ||||||||||||||
Travel Retail3 | 125 | 63 | 104 | ||||||||||||||
Non-branded and bulk4 | 75 | 58 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 3,363 | $ | 3,461 | $ | 3,933 |
1Represents net sales of branded products to “advanced economies” as defined by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), excluding the United States. Our largest developed international markets in fiscal 2022 were Germany, Australia, the United Kingdom, and France.
2Represents net sales of branded products to “emerging and developing economies” as defined by the IMF. Our largest emerging markets in fiscal 2022 were Mexico, Poland, Brazil, Russia, and Chile.
3Represents net sales of branded products to global duty-free customers, other travel retail customers, and the U.S. military regardless of customer location.
4Includes net sales of used barrels, contract bottling, and bulk whiskey and wine, regardless of customer location.
The following table shows our net sales by product category:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Whiskey1 | $ | 2,671 | $ | 2,744 | $ | 3,110 | |||||||||||
Tequila2 | 275 | 299 | 364 | ||||||||||||||
Wine3 | 186 | 206 | 219 | ||||||||||||||
Vodka4 | 109 | 90 | 109 | ||||||||||||||
Non-branded and bulk5 | 75 | 58 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Rest of portfolio | 47 | 64 | 70 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 3,363 | $ | 3,461 | $ | 3,933 |
2Includes the Herradura family of brands, el Jimador, New Mix, and other tequilas.
3Includes Korbel Champagne and Sonoma-Cutrer wines.
4Includes Finlandia.
5Includes net sales of used barrels, contract bottling, and bulk whiskey and wine.
65
9. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
We sponsor various defined benefit pension plans as well as postretirement plans providing retiree health care and retiree life insurance benefits. Below, we discuss our obligations related to these plans, the assets dedicated to meeting the obligations, and the amounts we recognized in our financial statements as a result of sponsoring these plans.
Obligations. We provide eligible employees with pension and other postretirement benefits based on factors such as years of service and compensation level during employment. The pension obligation shown below (“projected benefit obligation”) consists of: (a) benefits earned by employees to date based on current salary levels (“accumulated benefit obligation”); and (b) benefits to be received by employees as a result of expected future salary increases. (The obligation for medical and life insurance benefits is not affected by future salary increases.) The following table shows how the present value of our projected benefit obligations changed during each of the last two years.
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligation at beginning of year | $ | 1,005 | $ | 1,012 | $ | 51 | $ | 49 | |||||||||||||||
Service cost | 26 | 26 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost | 25 | 22 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss (gain)1 | 9 | (132) | (1) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||
Retiree contributions | — | — | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (53) | (82) | (4) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||
Obligation at end of year | $ | 1,012 | $ | 846 | $ | 49 | $ | 43 |
1 The net actuarial loss (gain) during each year was primarily attributable to changes in discount rates .
Service cost represents the present value of the benefits attributed to service rendered by employees during the year. Interest cost is the increase in the present value of the obligation due to the passage of time. Net actuarial loss (gain) is the change in value of the obligation resulting from experience different from that assumed or from a change in an actuarial assumption. (We discuss actuarial assumptions used at the end of this note.) Plan amendments may also change the value of the obligation.
As shown in the previous table, the change in the value of our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations also includes the effect of benefit payments and retiree contributions. Expected benefit payments (net of retiree contributions) over the next 10 years are as follows:
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | ||||||||||
2023 | $ | 64 | $ | 3 | |||||||
2024 | 61 | 3 | |||||||||
2025 | 60 | 3 | |||||||||
2026 | 61 | 3 | |||||||||
2027 | 62 | 3 | |||||||||
2028 – 2032 | 312 | 16 |
Assets. We invest in specific assets to fund our pension benefit obligations. Our investment goal is to earn a total return that, over time, will grow assets sufficiently to fund our plans' liabilities, after providing appropriate levels of contributions and accepting prudent levels of investment risk. To achieve this goal, plan assets are invested primarily in funds or portfolios of funds managed by outside managers. Investment risk is managed by company policies that require diversification of asset classes, manager styles, and individual holdings. We measure and monitor investment risk through quarterly and annual performance reviews, and through periodic asset/liability studies.
Asset allocation is the most important method for achieving our investment goals and is based on our assessment of the plans' long-term return objectives and the appropriate balances needed for liquidity, stability, and diversification. As of April 30, 2022, our target asset allocation is a mix of 40% public equity investments, 47% fixed income investments, and 13% alternative investments.
66
The following table shows the fair value of pension plan assets by category as of the end of the last two years. (Fair value levels are defined in Note 14.)
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | $ | 103 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 103 | |||||||||||||||
Limited partnership interest1 | — | — | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 103 | $ | — | $ | 2 | 105 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments measured at net asset value: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commingled trust funds2: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity funds | 266 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income funds | 357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate funds | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Limited partnership interests3 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 836 | |||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | $ | 78 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 78 | |||||||||||||||
Limited partnership interest1 | — | — | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 78 | $ | — | $ | 2 | 80 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments measured at net asset value: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commingled trust funds2: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity funds | 218 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income funds | 318 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate funds | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Limited partnership interests3 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 741 |
1 This limited partnership interest was initially valued at cost and has been adjusted to fair value as determined in good faith by management of the partnership using various factors, and does not meet the requirements for reporting at the net asset value (NAV). The valuation requires significant judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices and the inherent lack of liquidity. This limited partnership has a term expiring in September 2022, although this period may be extended.
2 Commingled trust fund valuations are based on the NAV of the funds as determined by the fund administrators and reviewed by us. NAV represents the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus liabilities and divided by the number of shares or units outstanding. Generally, for commingled trust funds other than real estate, redemptions are permitted daily with no notice period. The real estate fund is redeemable quarterly with 110 days' notice.
3 These limited partnership interests were initially valued at cost and have been adjusted using NAV per audited financial statements. Investments are generally not eligible for immediate redemption and have original terms averaging 10 to 13 years, although those periods may be extended.
67
The following table shows how the fair value of the Level 3 assets changed during each of the last two years. There were no transfers of assets between Level 3 and either of the other two levels.
Level 3 | |||||
Balance as of April 30, 2020 | $ | 2 | |||
Return on assets held at end of year | 1 | ||||
Sales and settlements | (1) | ||||
Balance as of April 30, 2021 | 2 | ||||
Return on assets held at end of year | — | ||||
Sales and settlements | — | ||||
Balance as of April 30, 2022 | $ | 2 |
The following table shows how the total fair value of all pension plan assets changed during each of the last two years. (We do not have assets set aside for postretirement medical or life insurance benefits.)
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets at beginning of year | $ | 749 | $ | 836 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Actual return on assets | 124 | (25) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Retiree contributions | — | — | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Company contributions | 16 | 12 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (53) | (82) | (4) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets at end of year | $ | 836 | $ | 741 | $ | — | $ | — |
We currently expect to contribute $13 to our pension plans and $3 to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans during 2023.
Funded status. The funded status of a plan refers to the difference between its assets and its obligations. The following table shows the funded status of our plans.
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 836 | $ | 741 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Obligations | (1,012) | (846) | (49) | (43) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funded status | $ | (176) | $ | (105) | $ | (49) | $ | (43) |
The funded status is recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | $ | 4 | $ | 46 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (7) | (8) | (3) | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits | (173) | (143) | (46) | (40) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net liability | $ | (176) | $ | (105) | $ | (49) | $ | (43) | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before tax: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial gain (loss) | $ | (298) | $ | (201) | $ | (9) | $ | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Prior service credit (cost) | (5) | (4) | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | (303) | $ | (205) | $ | (5) | $ | (1) |
68
The following table compares our pension plans whose accumulated benefit obligations exceed their assets with our pension plans whose assets exceed their accumulated benefit obligations.
Accumulated Benefit Obligation | Plan Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of assets | $ | (155) | $ | (135) | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Plans with assets in excess of accumulated benefit obligation | (748) | (623) | 836 | 741 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (903) | $ | (758) | $ | 836 | $ | 741 |
The following table compares our pension plans whose projected benefit obligations exceed their assets with our pension plans whose assets exceed their projected benefit obligations.
Projected Benefit Obligation | Plan Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||
Plans with projected benefit obligation in excess of assets | $ | (941) | $ | (150) | $ | 761 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Plans with assets in excess of projected benefit obligation | (71) | (696) | 75 | 741 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (1,012) | $ | (846) | $ | 836 | $ | 741 |
As noted above, we have no assets set aside for the postretirement medical or life insurance benefit plans.
Pension cost. The following table shows the components of the pension cost recognized during each of the last three years. The amount for each year includes amortization of the prior service cost/credit and net actuarial loss/gain included in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of the beginning of the year.
Pension Benefits | |||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 24 | $ | 26 | $ | 26 | |||||||||||
Interest cost | 31 | 25 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
Expected return on assets | (46) | (46) | (45) | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of: | |||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss (gain) | 19 | 27 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
Settlement charge | 1 | — | 12 | ||||||||||||||
Net cost | $ | 30 | $ | 33 | $ | 39 |
We determine the expected return on plan assets by applying our long-term rate of return assumption to the market-related value of plan assets, adjusted by earnings on contributions and benefit payments expected to be made during the year. We calculate the market-related value of plan assets by amortizing actual versus expected returns over five years.
We amortize prior service costs and net actuarial gains or losses on straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of the employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. However, for net actuarial gains or losses, we use a corridor approach that amortizes them only to the extent the gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or market-related value of plan assets.
69
Other postretirement benefits cost. The following table shows the components of the postretirement medical and life insurance benefits cost that we recognized during each of the last three years.
Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | |||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | |||||||||||
Interest cost | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of: | |||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) | (3) | (3) | (2) | ||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss (gain) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Net cost | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 |
We amortize prior service costs and net actuarial gains or losses on straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of the employees expected to receive benefits under the plan.
Other comprehensive income (loss). Prior service cost/credit and net actuarial loss/gain are recognized in other comprehensive income or loss (OCI) during the period in which they arise. These amounts are later amortized from accumulated OCI into pension and other postretirement benefit cost over future periods as described above. The following table shows the pre-tax effect of these amounts on OCI during each of the last three years.
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial gain (loss) | $ | (115) | $ | 69 | $ | 62 | $ | (2) | $ | 1 | $ | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization reclassified to earnings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) | 1 | 1 | 1 | (3) | (3) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss (gain) | 20 | 27 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net amount recognized in OCI | $ | (94) | $ | 97 | $ | 98 | $ | (4) | $ | (1) | $ | 4 |
Assumptions and sensitivity. We use various assumptions to determine the obligations and cost related to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The weighted-average assumptions used in computing benefit plan obligations as of the end of the last two years were as follows:
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 3.16 % | 4.36 | % | 3.08 % | 4.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Rate of salary increase | 4.00 % | 4.00 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest crediting rate | 3.06 % | 3.06 | % | n/a | n/a |
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing benefit plan cost during each of the last three years were as follows:
Pension Benefits | Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate for service cost | 4.17 % | 3.49 % | 3.36 | % | 4.24 % | 3.59 % | 3.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate for interest cost | 3.57 % | 2.56 % | 2.34 | % | 3.53 % | 2.47 % | 2.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of salary increase | 4.00 % | 4.00 % | 4.00 | % | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest crediting rate | 3.07 | % | 3.07 % | 3.06 | % | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 6.50 % | 6.50 % | 6.25 | % | n/a | n/a | n/a |
The assumed discount rates are determined using a yield curve based on the interest rates of high-quality debt securities with maturities corresponding to the expected timing of our benefit payments. The service cost and interest cost components are measured by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period.
70
The assumed rate of salary increase reflects the expected average annual increase in salaries as a result of inflation, merit increases, and promotions over the service period of the plan participants.
The assumed interest crediting is based on the greater of the average yield on 30-year Treasury bonds or the minimum rate specified in the applicable pension plan.
The expected return on plan assets represents the long-term rate of return that we assume will be earned over the life of the pension assets. The assumption reflects expected capital market returns for each asset class, which are based on historical returns, adjusted for the expected effects of diversification.
The assumed health care cost trend rates as of the end of the last two years were as follows:
Medical and Life Insurance Benefits | |||||||||||
2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year | 6.60 % | 6.10 | % | ||||||||
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) | 4.50 % | 4.50 | % | ||||||||
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate | 2030 | 2030 |
Savings plans. We also sponsor various defined contribution benefit plans that together cover substantially all U.S. employees. Employees can make voluntary contributions in accordance with their respective plans, which include a 401(k) tax deferral option. We match a percentage of each employee's contributions in accordance with plan terms. We expensed $12, $12, and $13 for matching contributions during 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively.
International plans. The information presented above for defined benefit plans and defined contribution benefit plans reflects amounts for U.S. plans only. Information about similar international plans is not presented due to immateriality.
10. Stock-Based Compensation
The Brown-Forman 2013 Omnibus Compensation Plan (Plan) is our incentive compensation plan, designed to reward participants (including eligible officers, employees, and non-employee directors) for company performance. Under the Plan, we can grant stock-based incentive awards for up to 20,750,000 shares of common stock to eligible participants until July 28, 2023. As of April 30, 2022, awards for approximately 12,412,000 shares remain available for issuance under the Plan. We try to limit the source of shares delivered to participants under the Plan to treasury shares that we purchase from time to time on the open market (in connection with a publicly announced share repurchase program), in private transactions, or otherwise.
Awards granted under the Plan include stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs), performance-based restricted stock units (PBRSUs), and deferred stock units (DSUs).
SSARs. We grant SSARs at an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the underlying stock on the grant date. SSARs become exercisable after three years from the first day of the fiscal year of grant and generally are exercisable for seven years after that date. The following table presents information about SSARs outstanding as of April 30, 2022, and for the year then ended.
Number of SSARs (in thousands) | Weighted- Average Exercise Price per SSAR | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at April 30, 2021 | 4,311 | $ | 43.54 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Granted | 451 | 71.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised | (565) | 29.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired | (29) | 63.82 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at April 30, 2022 | 4,232 | $ | 47.54 | 4.9 | $ | 86 | |||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at April 30, 2022 | 2,829 | $ | 39.55 | 3.5 | $ | 79 | |||||||||||||||||
71
We use the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of a SSAR. The weighted-average grant-date fair values and related valuation assumptions for the SSARS granted during each of the last three years were as follows:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Grant-date fair value | $ | 11.13 | $ | 14.61 | $ | 16.61 | |||||||||||
Valuation assumptions: | |||||||||||||||||
Expected term (years) | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | ||||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.9 % | 0.4 % | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Expected volatility | 19.3 % | 23.3 % | 24.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Expected dividend yield | 1.2 % | 1.0 % | 1.0 | % |
The expected term is based on past exercise experience for similar awards. The risk-free interest rate is based on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury rates as of the date of grant. Expected volatility and dividend yield are based on historical data, with consideration of other factors when applicable.
PBRSUs. The PBRSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period that begins on the first day of the fiscal year of grant. Performance is measured by comparing the three-year cumulative total shareholder return of our Class B common stock to the three-year cumulative total shareholder return of the companies in the Standard & Poor's Consumer Staples Index, with specific payout levels ranging from 50% to 150%. At the end of the performance period, the number of PBRSUs is adjusted for performance, and then adjusted upward to account for dividends paid during the second and third years of the performance period. The resulting PBRSUs are then converted to common shares.
The following table presents information about PBRSUs outstanding as of April 30, 2022, and for the year then ended.
Number of PBRSUs (in thousands) | Weighted- Average Fair Value at Grant Date | ||||||||||
Outstanding at April 30, 2021 | 254 | $ | 61.76 | ||||||||
Granted | 108 | $ | 70.11 | ||||||||
Adjusted for performance and dividends | (10) | $ | 55.28 | ||||||||
Converted to common shares | (77) | $ | 55.28 | ||||||||
Forfeited | (5) | $ | 69.19 | ||||||||
Outstanding at April 30, 2022 | 270 | $ | 67.02 |
We calculate the grant-date fair value of a PBRSU using a Monte Carlo simulation technique. The weighted average grant-date fair values and related valuation assumptions for these awards granted during each of the last three years were as follows:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Grant-date fair value | $ | 56.99 | $ | 73.68 | $ | 70.11 | |||||||||||
Valuation assumptions: | |||||||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.8 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||
Expected volatility | 21.8 | % | 29.9 | % | 29.1 | % | |||||||||||
Expected dividend yield | 1.2 | % | 1.1 | % | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
Remaining performance period (years) as of grant date | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
DSUs. DSUs are granted to our non-employee directors. Each DSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock based on the closing price of the shares on the date of grant. Outstanding DSUs are credited with dividend-equivalent DSUs when dividends are paid on our common stock. Each annual grant vests after one year. DSUs are paid out in shares after the completion of a director's tenure on the board plus a six-month waiting period. The director may elect to receive the distribution either in a single lump sum or in ten equal annual installments. As of April 30, 2022, there were approximately 225,000 outstanding DSUs, of which approximately 201,000 were vested.
The grant-date fair value of a DSU is the closing market price of the underlying stock on the grant date. The weighted average grant-date fair values for these awards granted during each of the last three years were as follows:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Grant-date fair value | $ | 53.34 | $ | 63.01 | $ | 67.35 | |||||||||||
72
Additional information. The pre-tax stock-based compensation expense and related deferred income tax benefits recognized during the last three fiscal years were as follows:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-tax compensation expense | $ | 11 | $ | 12 | $ | 15 | |||||||||||
Deferred tax benefit | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
As of April 30, 2022, there was $9 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. Further information related to our stock-based awards for the last three years is as follows:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of SSARs exercised | $ | 89 | $ | 47 | $ | 23 | |||||||||||
Fair value of shares vested | 14 | 13 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from exercise / vesting of awards | 20 | 10 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
11. Income Taxes
We incur income taxes on the earnings of our U.S. and foreign operations. The following table, based on the locations of the taxable entities from which sales were derived (rather than the location of customers), presents the U.S. and foreign components of our income before income taxes:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
United States | $ | 849 | $ | 832 | $ | 954 | |||||||||||
Foreign | 160 | 249 | 160 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,009 | $ | 1,081 | $ | 1,114 |
The income shown above was determined according to GAAP. Because those standards sometimes differ from the tax rules used to calculate taxable income, there are differences between: (a) the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income for a year and (b) the tax bases of assets or liabilities and their amounts as recorded in our financial statements. As a result, we recognize a current tax liability for the estimated income tax payable on the current tax return, and deferred tax liabilities (tax on income that will be recognized on future tax returns) and deferred tax assets (tax from deductions that will be recognized on future tax returns) for the estimated effects of the differences mentioned above.
Total income tax expense for a year includes the tax associated with the current tax return (current tax expense) and the change in the net deferred tax asset or liability (deferred tax expense). Our total income tax expense for each of the last three years was as follows:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Current: | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. federal | $ | 95 | $ | 146 | $ | 205 | |||||||||||
Foreign | 29 | 50 | 64 | ||||||||||||||
State and local | 19 | 35 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
143 | 231 | 287 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. federal | 34 | (4) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign | 7 | (47) | (9) | ||||||||||||||
State and local | (2) | (2) | (3) | ||||||||||||||
39 | (53) | (11) | |||||||||||||||
$ | 182 | $ | 178 | $ | 276 |
73
Our consolidated effective tax rate usually differs from current statutory rates due to the recognition of amounts for events or transactions with no tax consequences. The following table reconciles our effective tax rate to the federal statutory tax rate in the United States:
Percent of Income Before Taxes | |||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. federal statutory rate | 21.0 | % | 21.0 | % | 21.0 | % | |||||||||||
State taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit | 1.7 | % | 2.4 | % | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
Income taxed at other than U.S. federal statutory rate | — | % | 0.3 | % | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||
Prior intercompany sales taxed at higher than current U.S. federal statutory rate | — | % | 0.2 | % | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||
Tax benefit from foreign-derived sales | (2.0 | %) | (1.7 | %) | (1.8) | % | |||||||||||
Adjustments related to prior years | (1.1 | %) | (0.2 | %) | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards | (2.0 | %) | (1.0 | %) | (0.5) | % | |||||||||||
Tax rate changes | — | % | — | % | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||
Intercompany transfer of assets | — | % | (4.0 | %) | — | % | |||||||||||
Other, net | 0.4 | % | (0.5 | %) | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||
Effective rate | 18.0 | % | 16.5 | % | 24.8 | % |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the end of each of the last two years were as follows:
April 30, | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||||
Postretirement and other benefits | $ | 90 | $ | 69 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities and other | 47 | 36 | |||||||||
Inventories | 30 | 40 | |||||||||
Lease liabilities | 17 | 20 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments | 5 | — | |||||||||
Loss and credit carryforwards | 63 | 69 | |||||||||
Total deferred tax assets | 252 | 234 | |||||||||
Valuation allowance | (20) | (27) | |||||||||
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance | 232 | 207 | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||||||
Intangible assets | (214) | (219) | |||||||||
Property, plant, and equipment | (89) | (87) | |||||||||
Right-of-use assets | (17) | (20) | |||||||||
Derivative instruments | — | (11) | |||||||||
Other | (11) | (15) | |||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | (331) | (352) | |||||||||
Net deferred tax liability | $ | (99) | $ | (145) |
Details of the loss and credit carryforwards and related valuation allowances as of the end of each of the last two years are as follows:
April 30, 2021 | April 30, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Amount | Deferred Tax Asset | Valuation Allowance | Gross Amount | Deferred Tax Asset | Valuation Allowance | Expiration (as of April 30, 2022) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 99 | $ | 15 | $ | (5) | $ | 53 | $ | 19 | $ | (8) | Various1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign | 228 | 48 | (15) | 241 | 50 | (19) | Various2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 327 | $ | 63 | $ | (20) | $ | 294 | $ | 69 | $ | (27) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1As of April 30, 2022, the deferred tax asset amount includes credit carryforwards of $8 that do not expire and loss and credit carryforwards of $11 that expire in varying amounts from 2023 to 2039.
2As of April 30, 2022, the deferred tax asset includes loss carryforwards of $19 that do not expire and $31 that expire in varying amounts over the next 9 years.
74
As of April 30, 2022, we had approximately $1,446 of undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries ($1,542 at April 30, 2021). Most of these earnings have been previously subject to tax, primarily as a result of the one-time repatriation tax on foreign earnings required by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Historically, we have asserted that the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are reinvested indefinitely outside the United States. We continue to maintain indefinite reinvestment assertions for most undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, and no deferred taxes have been provided on the earnings. For undistributed earnings not considered permanently reinvested, deferred tax liabilities have been provided for any applicable income taxes and withholding taxes payable in various countries, which are not significant. We have also asserted that other outside basis differences related to our foreign subsidiaries are reinvested indefinitely and that the determination of any unrecognized deferred tax liabilities is not practicable due to the complexities in the calculations. The other outside basis differences relate primarily to differences between U.S. GAAP and tax basis that arose through purchase accounting. These basis differences could reverse through sales of foreign subsidiaries or other transactions, none of which are considered probable as of April 30, 2022.
At April 30, 2022, we had $14 of gross unrecognized tax benefits, $11 of which would reduce our effective income tax rate if recognized. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits follows:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year | $ | 11 | $ | 11 | $ | 12 | |||||||||||
Additions for tax positions provided in prior periods | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Additions for tax positions provided in current period | — | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Decreases for tax positions provided in prior years | (1) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Settlements of tax positions in the current period | (1) | (1) | — | ||||||||||||||
Lapse of statutes of limitations | — | (1) | (2) | ||||||||||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year | $ | 11 | $ | 12 | $ | 14 |
We file income tax returns in the United States, including several state and local jurisdictions, as well as in several other countries where we conduct business. The major jurisdictions and their earliest fiscal years that are currently open for tax examinations are 2016 through 2021 in the United States, inclusive of federal and states; 2020 in the United Kingdom; 2018 in Australia; 2017 in Finland, Germany, Hungary, Korea, and Poland; 2016 in the Netherlands and Brazil; and 2013 in Mexico. In addition, we are participating in the Internal Revenue Service's Compliance Assurance Program for our fiscal 2022 tax year.
We believe there will be no material change in our gross unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months.
12. Acquisitions and Divestitures
Acquisitions. On July 3, 2019, we acquired 100% of the voting interests in The 86 Company, which owns Fords Gin, for $22 in cash. The purchase price was allocated largely to the intangible assets that were acquired, including goodwill of $11 and other indefinite-lived intangibles of $12, net of deferred tax liabilities of $1. The goodwill is primarily attributable to the value of leveraging our distribution network and brand-building expertise to grow global sales of the Fords Gin brand and to the knowledge and expertise of the organized workforce employed by the acquired business. We do not expect the goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes.
On December 1, 2020, we acquired 100% of the voting interests in Part Time Rangers Holdings Limited (Part Time Rangers) for $14 in cash (including repayment of debt). Part Time Rangers, which is based in New Zealand, produces spirits-based ready-to-drink products with all-natural fruit flavoring. The purchase price was allocated largely to the intangible assets of the acquired business, including goodwill of $8 and other intangible assets of $8, net of deferred tax liabilities of $2. The goodwill is primarily attributable to the value of leveraging our distribution network and brand-building expertise to grow sales of the Part Time Rangers brand. We do not expect the goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes.
The 86 Company and Part Time Rangers have been included in our consolidated financial statements since their respective acquisition dates. Actual and pro forma results are not presented due to immateriality.
Divestiture. On July 31, 2020, we sold the Early Times, Canadian Mist, and Collingwood brands for $177 in cash. The sale reflects the continued evolution of our portfolio strategy to focus on premium spirits brands. The total book value of the related business assets included in the sale was $50, consisting largely of inventories, the Canadian Mist production assets, and intellectual property. As a result of the sale, we recognized a pre-tax gain of $127 during fiscal 2021.
75
13. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
We are subject to market risks, including the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates. We use derivatives to help manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. We formally document the purpose of each derivative contract, which includes linking the contract to the financial exposure it is designed to mitigate. We do not hold or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
We use currency derivative contracts to limit our exposure to the foreign currency exchange risk that we cannot mitigate internally by using netting strategies. We designate most of these contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions (expected to occur within three years). We record all changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) until the underlying hedged transaction occurs, at which time we reclassify that amount into earnings.
Some of our currency derivatives are not designated as hedges because we use them to partially offset the immediate earnings impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on existing assets or liabilities. We immediately recognize the change in fair value of these contracts in earnings.
We had outstanding currency derivatives, related primarily to our euro, British pound, and Australian dollar exposures, with notional amounts for all hedged currencies totaling $1,218 and $801 at April 30, 2021 and 2022, respectively. The maximum term of outstanding derivative contracts was approximately 36 months at both April 30, 2021 and 2022.
We also use foreign currency-denominated debt to help manage our foreign currency exchange risk. We designate a portion of those debt instruments as net investment hedges, which are intended to mitigate foreign currency exposure related to non-U.S. dollar net investments in certain foreign subsidiaries. Any change in value of the designated portion of the hedging instruments is recorded in AOCI, offsetting the foreign currency translation adjustment of the related net investments that is also recorded in AOCI. The amount of foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedges was $680 and $636 as of April 30, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
At inception, we expect each financial instrument designated as a hedge to be highly effective in offsetting the financial exposure it is designed to mitigate. We also assess their effectiveness continually. If determined to be no longer highly effective, we stop designating and accounting for the instrument as a hedge.
We use forward purchase contracts with suppliers to protect against corn price volatility. We expect to take physical delivery of the corn underlying each contract and use it for production over a reasonable period of time. Accordingly, we account for these contracts as normal purchases rather than as derivative instruments.
The following table presents the pre-tax impact that changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments and non-derivative hedging instruments had on AOCI and earnings during each of the last three years:
Classification in Statement of Operations | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI | n/a | $ | 61 | $ | (78) | $ | 76 | ||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings | Sales | 23 | 21 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings | Other income (expense), net | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings | Sales | 4 | (13) | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings | Other income (expense), net | (14) | 17 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedge: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI | n/a | 22 | (73) | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total amounts presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for line items affected by the net gains (losses) shown above: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales | 4,306 | 4,526 | 5,081 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (11) | 15 | (59) | ||||||||||||||||||||
76
We expect to reclassify $26 of deferred net gains on cash flow hedges recorded in AOCI as of April 30, 2022, to earnings during fiscal 2023. This reclassification would offset the anticipated earnings impact of the underlying hedged exposures. The actual amounts that we ultimately reclassify to earnings will depend on the exchange rates in effect when the underlying hedged transactions occur.
The following table presents the fair values of our derivative instruments as of April 30, 2021 and 2022:
Balance Sheet Classification | Derivative Assets | Derivative Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
April 30, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||
Designated as cash flow hedges: | |||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Other current assets | $ | 4 | $ | (2) | ||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Other assets | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Accrued expenses | 4 | (18) | ||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Other liabilities | 1 | (18) | ||||||||||||||
Not designated as hedges: | |||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Other current assets | 1 | — | ||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Accrued expenses | — | — | ||||||||||||||
April 30, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||
Designated as cash flow hedges: | |||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Other current assets | 32 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Other assets | 20 | (1) | ||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Accrued expenses | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Other liabilities | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Not designated as hedges: | |||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Other current assets | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | Accrued expenses | — | (1) | ||||||||||||||
The fair values reflected in the above table are presented on a gross basis. However, as discussed further below, the fair values of those instruments subject to net settlement agreements are presented on a net basis in our balance sheets.
In our statements of cash flows, we classify cash flows related to cash flow hedges in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged items.
Credit risk. We are exposed to credit-related losses if the counterparties to our derivative contracts default. This credit risk is limited to the fair value of the contracts. To manage this risk, we contract only with major financial institutions that have earned investment-grade credit ratings and with whom we have standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements that allow for net settlement of the derivative contracts. Also, we have established counterparty credit guidelines that we monitor regularly, and we monetize contracts when we believe it is warranted. Because of these safeguards, we believe we have no derivative positions that require credit valuation adjustments.
Our derivative instruments require us to maintain a specific level of creditworthiness, which we have maintained. If our creditworthiness were to fall below that level, then the counterparties to our derivative instruments could request immediate payment or collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with creditworthiness requirements that were in a net liability position was $30 and $0 at April 30, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
Offsetting. As noted above, our derivative contracts are governed by ISDA agreements that allow for net settlement of derivative contracts with the same counterparty. It is our policy to present the fair values of current derivatives (that is, those with a remaining term of 12 months or less) with the same counterparty on a net basis in our balance sheets. Similarly, we present the fair values of noncurrent derivatives with the same counterparty on a net basis. We do not net current derivatives with noncurrent derivatives in our balance sheets.
77
The following table summarizes the gross and net amounts of our derivative contracts:
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities) | Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet | Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet | Net Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets | $ | 10 | $ | (7) | $ | 3 | $ | (1) | $ | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | (38) | 7 | (31) | 1 | (30) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets | 52 | (4) | 48 | (1) | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | (5) | 4 | (1) | 1 | — |
No cash collateral was received or pledged related to our derivative contracts as of April 30, 2021 or 2022.
14. Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis:
2021 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,150 | $ | 1,150 | $ | 868 | $ | 868 | |||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | 3 | 3 | 48 | 48 | |||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives | 31 | 31 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 205 | 205 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt (including current portion) | 2,354 | 2,663 | 2,269 | 2,239 | |||||||||||||||||||
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We categorize the fair values of assets and liabilities into three levels based on the assumptions (inputs) used to determine those values. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are:
•Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
•Level 2 – Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
•Level 3 – Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity.
We determine the fair values of our currency derivatives (forward contracts) using standard valuation models. The significant inputs used in these models, which are readily available in public markets or can be derived from observable market transactions, include the applicable spot exchange rates, forward exchange rates, and interest rates. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
We determine the fair value of long-term debt primarily based on the prices at which identical or similar debt has recently traded in the market and also considering the overall market conditions on the date of valuation. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
The fair values of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term borrowings approximate the carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments.
We measure some assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. That is, we do not measure them at fair value on an ongoing basis, but we do adjust them to fair value in some circumstances (for example, when we determine that an asset is impaired). During fiscal 2022, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $9 on certain fixed assets. The impairment charges, which were based on our measurements of the estimated fair values of those assets, are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The remaining carrying amount of those fixed assets is not significant. Additionally, as discussed in Note 4, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $52 during fiscal 2022 related to our Finlandia brand name. The
78
impairment charge was based on the estimated fair value of the brand name, which we determined using the “relief from royalty” method, and which is categorized as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. No other material nonrecurring fair value measurements were required during the periods presented in these financial statements.
15. Leases
We enter into lease arrangements, which we use primarily for office space, vehicles, and land. Substantially all of our leases are operating leases. Our finance leases are not material.
We record lease liabilities and right-of-use (ROU) assets on our balance sheet for leases with terms exceeding 12 months. We do not record lease liabilities or ROU assets for short-term leases. The amounts recorded for lease liabilities and ROU assets are based on the estimated present value, as of the lease commencement date, of the future payments to be made over the lease term. We calculate the present value using our incremental borrowing rate that corresponds to the term of the lease. We include the effect of an option to renew or terminate a lease in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise the option.
Some of our leases contain non-lease components (e.g., maintenance or other services) in addition to lease components. We have elected the practical expedient not to separate the non-lease components from the lease components.
The following table shows information about our leases as of the end of the last two years:
Balance Sheet Classification | April 30, 2021 | April 30, 2022 | ||||||||||||
Right-of-use assets | Other assets | $ | 67 | $ | 74 | |||||||||
Lease liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Current | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 20 | $ | 21 | |||||||||
Non-current | Other liabilities | 49 | 54 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 69 | $ | 75 | ||||||||||
Weighted-average discount rate | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average remaining term | 5.3 years | 5.0 years |
The following table shows information about the effects of leases during each of the last three years:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Total lease cost1 | $ | 29 | $ | 41 | $ | 38 | |||||||||||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities2 | 21 | 26 | 25 | ||||||||||||||
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities | 35 | 25 | 35 |
1Consists primarily of operating lease cost. Other components of lease cost were not material.
2Classified within operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.
79
The following table includes a maturity analysis of future (undiscounted) lease payments and a reconciliation of those payments to the lease liabilities recorded on our balance sheet as of April 30, 2022:
April 30, 2022 | |||||
2023 | $ | 22 | |||
2024 | 18 | ||||
2025 | 13 | ||||
2026 | 9 | ||||
2027 | 7 | ||||
Thereafter | 10 | ||||
Total lease payments | 79 | ||||
Less: Present value discount | (4) | ||||
Lease liabilities | $ | 75 | |||
80
16. Other Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of net other comprehensive income (loss) during each of the last three years:
Pre-Tax | Tax | Net | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended April 30, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on currency translation | $ | (88) | $ | (6) | $ | (94) | |||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | (88) | (6) | (94) | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments | 61 | (14) | 47 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings1 | (23) | 6 | (17) | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | 38 | (8) | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Postretirement benefits adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost | (119) | 28 | (91) | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings2 | 18 | (4) | 14 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | (101) | 24 | (77) | ||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net | $ | (151) | $ | 10 | $ | (141) | |||||||||||
Year Ended April 30, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on currency translation | $ | 106 | $ | 17 | $ | 123 | |||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | 106 | 17 | 123 | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments | (78) | 17 | (61) | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings1 | (21) | 6 | (15) | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | (99) | 23 | (76) | ||||||||||||||
Postretirement benefits adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost | 71 | (16) | 55 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings2 | 30 | (7) | 23 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | 101 | (23) | 78 | ||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net | $ | 108 | $ | 17 | $ | 125 | |||||||||||
Year Ended April 30, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on currency translation | $ | (42) | $ | (18) | $ | (60) | |||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | (42) | (18) | (60) | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments | 76 | (17) | 59 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings1 | (7) | 1 | (6) | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | 69 | (16) | 53 | ||||||||||||||
Postretirement benefits adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost | 67 | (16) | 51 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings2 | 34 | (8) | 26 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | 101 | (24) | 77 | ||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net | $ | 128 | $ | (58) | $ | 70 | |||||||||||
1For 2022, $(2) of the pre-tax amount of $(7) is classified in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Otherwise, the pre-tax amount for each year is classified as sales.
2For 2021, $4 of the pre-tax amount of $30 is classified in gain on sale of business in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Otherwise, the pre-tax amount for each year is classified as non-operating postretirement expense.
81
17. Supplemental Information
The following table presents net sales by geography:
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales: | |||||||||||||||||
United States | $ | 1,690 | $ | 1,748 | $ | 1,917 | |||||||||||
Germany | 171 | 206 | 228 | ||||||||||||||
Australia | 155 | 209 | 219 | ||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 180 | 205 | 218 | ||||||||||||||
Mexico | 155 | 150 | 178 | ||||||||||||||
Other | 1,012 | 943 | 1,173 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 3,363 | $ | 3,461 | $ | 3,933 |
Net sales are attributed to countries based on where customers are located. See Note 8 for additional information about net sales, including net sales by product category.
Our two largest customers accounted for 18% and 13% of consolidated net sales in 2020; 19% and 13% of consolidated net sales in 2021; and 14% and 12% of consolidated net sales in 2022.
The net book value of property, plant, and equipment located outside the United States was $107 and $116 as of April 30, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Other long-lived assets located outside the United States are not significant.
We have concluded that our business constitutes a single operating segment.
82
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) (our principal executive and principal financial officers), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of fiscal 2022. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures: (a) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms; and (b) include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended April 30, 2022, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Management's report on our internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2022, and our independent registered public accounting firm's report on our internal control over financial reporting are set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Information on our Executive Officers is included under the caption “Employees and Executive Officers” in Part I of this report. For the other information required by this item, see the following sections of our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held July 28, 2022 (“2022 Proxy Statement”), which information is incorporated into this report by reference: (a) “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” (for biographical information on directors and family relationships); (b) “Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” (for information on our code of ethics); (c) “Selection of Directors” (for information on the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company's Board of Directors); and (d) “Board Committees” (for information on our Audit Committee).
Item 11. Executive Compensation
For the information required by this item, refer to the following sections of our 2022 Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated into this report by reference: (a) “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” (b) “Compensation Tables” (c) “Director Compensation” (d) “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” (e) “Compensation Committee Report” and (f) “Pay Ratio Disclosure.”
83
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table summarizes information as of April 30, 2022, about our equity compensation plans under which we have made grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, market value units, performance units, or other equity awards.
Plan Category | Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights1 | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights2 | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by Class A common stockholders | 1,767,784 | $47.54 | 12,412,433 |
1Includes 1,272,605 Class B common shares to be issued upon exercise of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs); 124,900 Class B performance-based restricted stock units (PBRSUs); 145,294 Class A PBRSUs; 169,156 Class A common deferred stock units (DSUs); and 55,829 Class B common DSUs issued under the Brown-Forman 2004 or 2013 Omnibus Compensation Plans. SSARs are exercisable for an amount of our common stock with a value equal to the increase in the fair market value of the common stock from the date the SSARs were granted. The fair market value of our common stock at fiscal year-end has been used for the purposes of reporting the number of shares to be issued upon exercise of the 4,232,521 SSARs outstanding at fiscal year-end.
2PBRSUs and DSUs have no exercise price because their value depends on continued employment or service over time, and are to be settled for shares of Class B common stock. Accordingly, these have been disregarded for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price.
For the other information required by this item, refer to the section entitled “Stock Ownership” of our 2022 Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated into this report by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
For the information required by this item, refer to the following sections of our 2022 Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated into this report by reference: (a) “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and (b) “Our Independent Directors.”
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
For the information required by this item, refer to the following sections of our 2022 Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated into this report by reference: (a) “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and (b) “Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.”
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Page | ||||||||
(a)(1) | Financial Statements | |||||||
The following documents are included in Item 8 of this report: | ||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
(a)(2) | Financial Statement Schedule: | |||||||
We have omitted all other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission either because they are not required under the related instructions, because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, or because they do not apply.
84
(a)(3) Exhibits:
The following documents are filed with this report:
Exhibit Index | |||||
10.23 | |||||
21 | |||||
23.1 | |||||
23.2 | |||||
31.1 | |||||
31.2 | |||||
32 | |||||
101 | The following materials from Brown-Forman Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2022, in Inline XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) format: (a) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (b) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (c) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (d) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (e) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, and (f) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File in Inline XBRL format (included in Exhibit 101). |
The following documents have been previously filed:
85
Exhibit Index | ||||||||
4.12 | ||||||||
4.13 | ||||||||
4.14 | ||||||||
4.15 | ||||||||
4.16 | ||||||||
4.17 | ||||||||
10.1 | ||||||||
10.2 | ||||||||
10.3 | ||||||||
10.4 | ||||||||
10.5 | ||||||||
10.6 | ||||||||
10.7 | ||||||||
10.8 | ||||||||
10.9 | ||||||||
10.10 | ||||||||
10.11 | ||||||||
10.12 | ||||||||
10.13 | ||||||||
10.14 |
86
* | Indicates management contract, compensatory plan, or arrangement. |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION (Registrant) | ||||||||
/s/ Lawson E. Whiting | ||||||||
By: | Lawson E. Whiting | |||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: June 17, 2022
/s/ Campbell P. Brown | ||||||||
By: | Campbell P. Brown | |||||||
Director, Chair of the Board |
/s/ Lawson E. Whiting | ||||||||
By: | Lawson E. Whiting | |||||||
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company (Principal Executive Officer) |
/s/ Patrick Bousquet-Chavanne | ||||||||
By: | Patrick Bousquet-Chavanne | |||||||
Director |
/s/ Stuart R. Brown | ||||||||
By: | Stuart R. Brown | |||||||
Director |
88
/s/ John D. Cook | ||||||||
By: | John D. Cook | |||||||
Director |
/s/ Marshall B. Farrer | ||||||||
By: | Marshall B. Farrer | |||||||
Director |
/s/ Augusta Brown Holland | ||||||||
By: | Augusta Brown Holland | |||||||
Director |
/s/ Michael J. Roney | ||||||||
By: | Michael J. Roney | |||||||
Director |
/s/ Jan E. Singer | ||||||||
By: | Jan E. Singer | |||||||
Director |
/s/ Tracy L. Skeans | ||||||||
By: | Tracy L. Skeans | |||||||
Director |
/s/ Michael A. Todman | ||||||||
By: | Michael A. Todman | |||||||
Director |
89
/s/ Leanne D. Cunningham | ||||||||
By: | Leanne D. Cunningham | |||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
/s/ Kelli N. Brown | ||||||||
By: | Kelli N. Brown | |||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
90
Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
For the Years Ended April 30, 2020, 2021, and 2022
(Expressed in millions)
Col. A | Col. B | Col. C(1) | Col. C(2) | Col. D | Col. E | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses | Additions Charged to Other Accounts | Deductions | Balance at End of Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 7 | $ | 4 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax valuation allowance | $ | 25 | $ | 2 | $ | — | $ | 5 | $ | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||
2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 11 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4 | (1) | $ | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax valuation allowance | $ | 22 | $ | 10 | $ | — | $ | 12 | $ | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||
2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | — | $ | 1 | (1) | $ | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax valuation allowance | $ | 20 | $ | 8 | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 27 |
(1)Doubtful accounts written off, net of recoveries.
91