CARVER BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
_________________________________
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
[X]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
[_]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
OF 1934
For
the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission
File Number: 0-21487
CARVER BANCORP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3904174
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
75
West 125th
Street, New York, New York
|
10027
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (718)
230-2900
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
X
No
___
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer ___ Accelerated Filer ___
Non-Accelerated Filer X
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
___ No X
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common
Stock, par value $.01
|
2,508,947
|
|
Class
|
Outstanding
at October 31, 2006
|
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
||
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2006
(unaudited) and March 31, 2006
|
1
|
|
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended September
30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
2
|
|
|
||
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive
Income for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
|
3
|
|
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended September
30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
5
|
|
||
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
8
|
|
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
20
|
|
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
|
20
|
|
|
||
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
|
21
|
|
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
|
21
|
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
21
|
|
Item
3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
21
|
|
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
21
|
|
Item
5. Other
Information
|
21
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
21
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
22
|
EXHIBITS
|
|
E-1
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. Financial
Statements
CARVER
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|||
(In
thousands, except share
data)
|
September
30,
|
March
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2006
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
19,508
|
$
|
13,604
|
|||
Federal
funds sold
|
4,800
|
8,700
|
|||||
Interest
Earning Deposits
|
1,828
|
600
|
|||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
26,136
|
22,904
|
|||||
Securities:
|
|||||||
Available-for-sale,
at fair value (including pledged as collateral of $36,947 and $79,211
|
|||||||
at
September 30, 2006
and March 31, 2006, respectively)
|
68,153
|
81,882
|
|||||
Held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost (including pledged as collateral of $20,601 and
$26,039
|
|||||||
at
September 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively; fair value
of $20,378
and $25,880
|
|||||||
at
September 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively)
|
20,921
|
26,404
|
|||||
Total
securities
|
89,074
|
108,286
|
|||||
Loans
held-for-sale, net
|
29,887
|
-
|
|||||
Loans
receivable:
|
|||||||
Real
estate mortgage loans
|
524,224
|
495,994
|
|||||
Consumer
and commercial business loans
|
66,696
|
1,453
|
|||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(5,222
|
)
|
(4,015
|
)
|
|||
Total
loans receivable, net
|
585,698
|
493,432
|
|||||
Office
properties and equipment, net
|
14,326
|
13,194
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
4,679
|
4,627
|
|||||
Bank
owned life insurance
|
8,635
|
8,479
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
4,135
|
2,970
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
5,066
|
-
|
|||||
Core
Deposit Intangible
|
760
|
-
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
11,200
|
7,101
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
779,596
|
$
|
660,993
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Deposits
|
$
|
623,627
|
$
|
504,638
|
|||
Advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and other borrowed
money
|
92,658
|
93,792
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
14,543
|
13,866
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
730,828
|
612,296
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock (par value $0.01 per share: 10,000,000 shares authorized;
2,524,691
shares issued;
|
|||||||
2,511,347
and 2,506,822 outstanding at September 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006,
respectively)
|
25
|
25
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
24,037
|
23,935
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
25,204
|
25,736
|
|||||
Unamortized
awards of common stock under ESOP and management recognition plan
("MRP")
|
(10
|
)
|
(22
|
)
|
|||
Treasury
stock, at cost (13,344 shares at September 30, 2006 and 17,869
shares at
March 31, 2006)
|
(226
|
)
|
(303
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(262
|
)
|
(674
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
48,768
|
48,697
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
779,596
|
$
|
660,993
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
CARVER
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|||||||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Interest
Income:
|
|||||||||||||
Loans
|
$
|
8,317
|
$
|
6,214
|
$
|
16,208
|
$
|
12,421
|
|||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
842
|
1,135
|
1,775
|
2,260
|
|||||||||
Investment
securities
|
168
|
277
|
349
|
551
|
|||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
53
|
122
|
169
|
268
|
|||||||||
Total
interest income
|
9,380
|
7,748
|
18,501
|
15,500
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
|||||||||||||
Deposits
|
3,026
|
2,096
|
6,021
|
3,966
|
|||||||||
Advances
and other borrowed money
|
1,143
|
1,117
|
2,233
|
2,298
|
|||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
4,169
|
3,213
|
8,254
|
6,264
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
5,211
|
4,535
|
10,247
|
9,236
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
5,211
|
4,535
|
10,247
|
9,236
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Non-interest
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Depository
fees and charges
|
601
|
668
|
1,210
|
1,297
|
|||||||||
Loan
fees and service charges
|
245
|
302
|
490
|
960
|
|||||||||
Write-down
of loans held for sale
|
(702
|
)
|
-
|
(702
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Loss
on sale of securities
|
(645
|
)
|
-
|
(645
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Gain
on sale of loans
|
76
|
47
|
88
|
73
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
|||||||||
Other
|
85
|
14
|
163
|
99
|
|||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
(337
|
)
|
1,031
|
607
|
2,429
|
||||||||
Non-interest
expense:
|
|||||||||||||
Employee
compensation and benefits
|
2,326
|
2,330
|
4,611
|
4,854
|
|||||||||
Net
occupancy expense
|
610
|
578
|
1,194
|
1,079
|
|||||||||
Equipment,
net
|
514
|
488
|
991
|
929
|
|||||||||
Merger
related expenses
|
1,256
|
-
|
1,258
|
-
|
|||||||||
Other
|
1,536
|
1,240
|
2,921
|
2,568
|
|||||||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
6,242
|
4,636
|
10,975
|
9,430
|
|||||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(1,368
|
)
|
930
|
(121
|
)
|
2,235
|
|||||||
Income
tax (benefit) provision
|
(464
|
)
|
329
|
(19
|
)
|
793
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(904
|
)
|
$
|
601
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
$
|
1,442
|
|||
(Loss)
earnings per common share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
$
|
0.24
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
0.58
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
$
|
0.23
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
0.56
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
CARVER
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
COMMON
STOCK
|
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN CAPITAL
|
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
TREASURY
STOCK
|
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
COMMON
STOCK ACQUIRED BY ESOP
|
COMMON
STOCK ACQUIRED BY MRP
|
TOTAL
STOCK-HOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||||
Balance—March
31, 2006
|
$
25
|
$
23,935
|
$
25,736
|
$
(303)
|
$
(674)
|
$
(11)
|
$
(11)
|
$
48,697
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive
income :
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
-
|
-
|
(102)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(102)
|
|||||||||
Change
in net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of
taxes
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
412
|
-
|
-
|
412
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive
income, net of taxes:
|
-
|
-
|
(102)
|
-
|
412
|
-
|
-
|
310
|
|||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
-
|
-
|
(430)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(430)
|
||||||||||
Stock
based compensation activity, net
|
-
|
102
|
-
|
169
|
-
|
7
|
-
|
278
|
|||||||||
Treasury
stock activity
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(92)
|
-
|
-
|
5
|
(87)
|
|||||||||
Balance—September
30, 2006
|
$25
|
$24,037
|
$25,204
|
($226)
|
($262)
|
($4)
|
($6)
|
$48,768
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
CARVER
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
$
|
1,442
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
|
|||||||
by
operating activities:
|
|||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
ESOP
and MRP expense
|
125
|
217
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
802
|
770
|
|||||
Other
amortization
|
(28
|
)
|
(259
|
)
|
|||
Loss
from sale of securities
|
645
|
-
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of loans
|
(88
|
)
|
(73
|
)
|
|||
Write-down
of loans held for sale
|
702
|
||||||
Proceeds
from loans sold
|
6,394
|
5,072
|
|||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Increase
in accrued interest receivable
|
(175
|
)
|
(210
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
(increase) in other assets
|
(214
|
)
|
(5,265
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
in other liabilities
|
(732
|
)
|
(2,380
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
7,329
|
(686
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of securities:
|
|||||||
Available-for-sale
|
-
|
(26,811
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from principal payments, maturities and calls of
securities:
|
|||||||
Available-for-sale
|
17,225
|
35,166
|
|||||
Held-to-maturity
|
5,358
|
3,403
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
46,425
|
1,575
|
|||||
Disbursements
for loan originations
|
(60,363
|
)
|
(52,663
|
)
|
|||
Loans
purchased from third parties
|
(40,242
|
)
|
(41,512
|
)
|
|||
Principal
collections on loans
|
69,423
|
60,192
|
|||||
Redemption
(purchase) of FHLB-NY stock
|
601
|
(499
|
)
|
||||
Additions
to premises and equipment
|
(702
|
)
|
(830
|
)
|
|||
Payments
for acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
(2,425
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
35,300
|
(21,979
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in deposits
|
(25,153
|
)
|
12,401
|
||||
Net
(repayment of) proceeds from FHLB advances
|
(13,662
|
)
|
9,988
|
||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(152
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Dividends
paid
|
(430
|
)
|
(376
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash (used in)provided by financing activities
|
(39,397
|
)
|
22,013
|
||||
Net
increase(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
3,232
|
(652
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
22,904
|
20,420
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
$
|
26,136
|
$
|
19,768
|
|||
Supplemental
information:
|
|||||||
Noncash
Transfers-
|
|||||||
Change
in unrealized (loss) gain on valuation of
available-for-sale
|
|||||||
investments,
net
|
$
|
413
|
$
|
182
|
|||
Cash
paid for-
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
8,156
|
$
|
6,261
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
1,726
|
$
|
2,092
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(1)
BASIS
OF
PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Carver Bancorp,
Inc.
(the “Holding Company”) have been prepared in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (“US-GAAP”) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for
complete consolidated financial statements. Certain information and note
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only
normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
condition, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows
of the Holding Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of and
for the periods shown have been included.
The
unaudited consolidated financial statements presented herein should be read
in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Holding Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006 (“2006 10-K”) previously filed with the SEC. The
consolidated results of operations and other data for the six-month period
ended
September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be
expected for the entire fiscal year ending March 31, 2007 (“fiscal
2007”).
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of
the Holding Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Carver Federal Savings
Bank (the “Bank” or “Carver Federal”), Alhambra Holding Corp., an inactive
Delaware corporation, and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, CFSB Realty
Corp. and CFSB Credit Corp., and the Bank’s majority owned subsidiary, Carver
Asset Corporation. On August 18, 2005 Carver Federal formed Carver Community
Development Corp. (“CCDC”), a wholly owned community development entity whose
purpose is to make qualified business loans in low-income communities. The
Holding Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to herein
collectively as “Carver” or the “Company.” All significant inter-company
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In
addition, the Holding Company has a subsidiary, Carver Statutory Trust I, which
is not consolidated with Carver for financial reporting purposes as a result
of
our adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), revised
Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities, and Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51” (“FIN46R”),
effective January 1, 2004. Carver Statutory Trust I was formed in 2003 for
the
purpose of issuing 13,000 shares, liquidation amount $1,000 per share, of
floating rate capital securities (“trust preferred securities”). Gross proceeds
from the sale of these trust preferred securities were $13.0 million, and,
together with the proceeds from the sale of the trust's common securities,
were
used to purchase approximately $13.4 million aggregate principal amount of
the
Holding Company's floating rate junior subordinated debt securities due 2033.
The junior subordinated debt securities which are included in other borrowed
money on the consolidated statements of financial condition, are repayable
quarterly at the option of the Holding Company, beginning on or after July
7,
2007, and have a mandatory repayment date of September 17, 2033. Interest on
the
junior subordinated debt securities is cumulative and payable at a floating
rate
per annum (reset quarterly) equal to 3.05% over three-month LIBOR, with a rate
of 8.44% as of September 30, 2006. The Holding Company has fully and
unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of Carver Statutory Trust I to
the trust's capital security holders.
(2)
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior year financial information to conform
to the September 30, 2006 presentation.
(3)
EARNINGS
(LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing income (loss) available
to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding over the period of determination. Diluted earnings (loss) per
common
share include any additional common shares as if all potentially dilutive
common
shares were issued (for instance, stock options with an exercise price that
is
less than the average market price of the common shares for the periods stated).
For the purpose of these calculations, unreleased ESOP shares are not considered
to be outstanding. For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, 60,914 and 62,679 shares of common stock were potentially issuable
from
the exercise of stock options with an exercise price that is less than the
average market price of the common shares for the three-months ended September
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the six-month periods ended September
30,
2006 and 2005, 61,503 and 65,070 shares of common stock were potentially
issuable from the exercise of stock options with an exercise price that is
less
than the average market price of the common shares for the six-months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The effects of these potentially
dilutive common shares were considered in determining the diluted earnings
(loss) per common share.
5
(4) |
STOCK
OPTION PLAN
|
Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation
The
Holding Company grants “incentive stock options” only to its employees and
grants “nonqualified stock options” to employees and non-employee directors.
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted revised Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123, “Share-Based Payment,” or SFAS No. 123R,
which requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions
be
recognized in the financial statements. SFAS No. 123R applies to all awards
granted after April 1, 2006 and to awards modified, repurchased or cancelled
after that date. Additionally, beginning April 1, 2006, the Company recognized
compensation cost for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite
service has not yet been rendered, based on the grant-date fair value of those
awards calculated under SFAS No. 123 for pro forma disclosures. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2006
totaled $41,000.
Prior
to
April 1, 2006, the Company applied the intrinsic value method of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and
related interpretations in accounting for stock incentive plans. Accordingly,
no
stock-based compensation cost was reflected in net income for stock option
grants, as all options granted under our stock incentive plans had an exercise
price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date
of
grant.
The
following table illustrates net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per common
share pro forma results with the application of SFAS 123R for Carver’s Stock
Option Plan, for the quarters ended:
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders:
|
|||||
As
reported
|
($904)
|
$601
|
|||
Add:
Stock-based employee compensation included
|
|||||
in
reported net income (loss), net of tax effects
|
41
|
-
|
|||
Less:
|
Total
stock-based employee compensation
|
||||
expense
determined under fair value based
|
|||||
methods
for all awards, net of tax effects
|
(41)
|
(14)
|
|||
Pro
forma
|
($904)
|
$587
|
|||
Basic
earnings per share:
|
|||||
As
reported
|
($0.36)
|
$0.24
|
|||
Pro
forma
|
(0.36)
|
0.23
|
|||
Diluted
earnings per share:
|
|||||
As
reported
|
($0.36)
|
$0.23
|
|||
Pro
forma
|
(0.36)
|
0.23
|
The
fair
value of the option grants was estimated on the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model applying the following weighted average
assumptions for the quarter ended September 30, 2005: risk-free interest rates
of 4.15%, volatility of 24.24%, expected dividend yield was 1.09% and an
expected life of ten years was used for all option grants.
(5) |
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Employee
Pension Plan
Carver
Federal has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering all
eligible employees. The benefits are based on each employee’s term of service.
Carver Federal’s policy was to fund the plan with contributions which equal the
maximum amount deductible for federal income tax purposes. The pension plan
was
curtailed and future benefit accruals ceased as of December 31,
2000.
6
Directors’
Retirement Plan
Concurrent
with the conversion to a stock form of ownership, Carver Federal adopted a
retirement plan for non-employee directors. The benefits are payable based
on
the term of service as a director. The directors’ retirement plan was curtailed
during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.
The
following table sets forth the components of net periodic pension expense for
the pension plan and directors’ retirement plan for the three months ended
September 30, of the calendar years indicated.
Employee
Pension Plan
|
Non-Employee
Directors' Plan
|
|||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
Cost
|
$
|
40
|
$
|
42
|
$
|
1
|
$
|
2
|
||||||||
Expected
Return on Assets
|
(55
|
)
|
(59
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Unrecognized
(Gain)/Loss
|
4
|
-
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Net
Periodic Benefit Expense / (Credit)
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
2
|
(6) |
COMMON
STOCK DIVIDEND
|
On
November 7, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Holding Company declared, for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, a cash dividend of nine cents ($0.09)
per
common share outstanding. The dividend is payable on December 5, 2006 to
stockholders of record at the close of business on November 21,
2006.
(7) |
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
Accounting
for Fair Value Measurements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements”
(“SFAS
No. 157”). The Statement establishes a single definition of fair value, sets up
a framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosures about the
use
of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 also emphasizes
that fair value is a market-based measurement by establishing a three level
“fair value hierarchy” that ranks the quality and reliability of inputs used in
valuation models, i.e., the lower the level, the more reliable the input. The
hierarchy provides the basis for the Statement’s new disclosure requirements
which are dependent upon the frequency of an item’s measurement (recurring
versus nonrecurring). SFAS No. 157 is effective for fair-value measures already
required or permitted by other standards for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those
fiscal years. Its provisions will generally be applied prospectively. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Accounting
for Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (“SFAS
No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires a calendar year-end company with publicly
traded equity securities that sponsors a postretirement benefit plan to fully
recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of it benefit plan in its 2006
year-end balance sheet. For all other entities, this provision is effective
for
fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007. The Statement also requires a company
to measure its plan assets and benefit obligations as of its year-end balance
sheet date, eliminating the use of earlier measurement dates currently
permissible. This provision is effective for fiscal years ending after December
15, 2008. At this time, we do not anticipate the adoption of SFAS No.
158 will have any impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
In
September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, codified
as SAB Topic 1.N, “Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements”
(“SAB
108”). SAB 108 states that registrants should use both a balance sheet and an
income
7
statement
approach when quantifying and evaluating the materiality of a misstatement.
It
also contains guidance on correcting errors under this dual approach and
provides transition guidance for correcting errors that existed in prior years.
SAB 108 is effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal
year ending after November 15, 2006. Earlier application is encouraged for
any
interim period of the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006 and
filed
after September 13, 2006. We do not anticipate the adoption of SAB 108 to have
a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In
June
2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109”
(“FIN
48”). FIN 48 clarifies Statement 109 by establishing a criterion that an
individual tax position would have to meet in order for some or all of the
associated benefit to be recognized in an entity’s financial statements. The
Interpretation applies to all tax positions within the scope of Statement 109.
In applying FIN 48, an entity is required to evaluate each individual tax
position using a two step-process. First, the entity should determine whether
the tax position is recognizable in its financial statements by assessing
whether it is “more-likely-than-not” that the position would be sustained by the
taxing authority on examination. The term “more-likely-than-not” means “a
likelihood of more than 50 percent.” Second, the entity should measure the
amount of benefit to recognize in its financial statements by determining the
largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. Each tax position
must be re-evaluated at the end of each reporting period to determine whether
recognition/derecognition is warranted. The liability resulting from the
difference between the tax return position and the amount recognized and
measured under FIN 48 should be classified as current or noncurrent depending
on
the anticipated timing of settlement. An entity should also accrue interest
and
penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in a manner consistent with the tax
law.
FIN 48 requires significant new annual disclosures in the notes to the financial
statements that include a tabular roll-forward of the beginning to ending
balances of an entity’s unrecognized tax benefits. The Interpretation is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and the cumulative
effect of applying FIN 48 should be reported as an adjustment to retained
earnings at the beginning of the period in which it is adopted. The Company
will
adopt this pronouncement as of April 1, 2007 and has not yet determined the
effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assets
In
March
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assets - an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
140,”
which
amends SFAS No. 140, “Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities”
with
respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 requires all separately recognized servicing
assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if
practicable, and permits an entity to choose either the amortization or fair
value measurement method for subsequent measurements. Additionally, at its
initial adoption, SFAS No. 156 permits a one-time reclassification of
available-for-sale securities to trading securities by entities with recognized
servicing rights, without calling into question the treatment of other
available-for-sale securities, provided that the securities are identified
in
some manner as offsetting the entity’s exposure to changes in the fair value of
servicing assets or servicing liabilities that a servicer elects to subsequently
measure at fair value. SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of the
first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Carver will adopt this
pronouncement as of April 1, 2007 and intends to apply the amortization method
for measurements of mortgage servicing rights, and does not expect the adoption
of SFAS No. 156 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
Accounting
for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting
for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments - an Amendment of FASB Statements
No.
133 and 140,”
which
amends SFAS No. 133, “Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,”
and
SFAS No. 140 and allows an entity to re-measure at fair value a hybrid financial
instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require
bifurcation from the host, if the holder irrevocably elects to account for
the
whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all
financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s
first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Any difference between
the total carrying amount of the individual components of the existing
bifurcated hybrid financial instrument and the fair value of the combined hybrid
financial instrument should be recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment
to
beginning retained earnings. Carver does not expect the adoption of SFAS No.
155
to have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results
of operations.
8
whether
the impairment is other than temporary; and how to measure an impairment loss
and also addresses accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition
of an
other-than-temporary impairment on a debt security, and requires certain
disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as
other-than-temporary impairments. Under FSP FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1, impairment
losses must be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between
the
security’s cost and it fair share value at the financial statement date, without
considering partial recoveries subsequent to that date. FSP FAS 115-1 and FAS
124-1 also requires that an investor recognize an other-than-temporary
impairment loss when a decision to sell a security has been made and the
investor does not expect the fair value of the security to fully recover prior
to the expected time of sale. This pronouncement is effective for reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FSP FAS 115-1 and
FAS
124-1 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of
operations or financial statement disclosures.
(8)
BUSINESS
COMBINATIONS
On
September 29, 2006, the Bank consummated its acquisition of Community Capital
Bank (“CCB”), contributing an additional $165.4 million in assets to its balance
sheet. Under the terms of the merger agreement, CCB’s shareholders were paid $40
per share. Together with deal costs of $879,000, the total transaction cost
was
$11.9 million. Also in connection with the acquisition, the Bank recorded
a one
time charge of $1.3 million for acquisition-related charges which are primarily
related to severance, early vendor contract termination fees, and systems
integration and conversion fees. As a result of the acquisition, the Bank’s
balance sheet reflects goodwill and a core deposit intangible of $5.1 million
and $760,000, respectively.
As
the
transaction closed at the end of the quarter, the Company’s results of
operations do not reflect the operations of CCB for the current quarter or
prior
periods.
The
preliminary allocation of the total transaction cost for the acquisition
of CCB
is as follows:
Goodwill
|
$
|
5,066
|
||
Other
intangible assets
|
760
|
|||
Tangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed :
|
||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
9,496
|
|||
Securities
|
50,707
|
|||
Loans
receivable, net
|
98,805
|
|||
Other
assets
|
6,412
|
|||
Deposits
|
(144,142
|
)
|
||
Borrowings
|
(12,500
|
)
|
||
Other
liabilities
|
(2,683
|
)
|
||
Total
purchase price
|
11,921
|
|||
Less
cash acquired from acquisition
|
(9,496
|
)
|
||
Net
cash used in acquisition
|
$
|
2,425
|
||
The
allocation of the transaction cost is based on a preliminary estimate and
is
subject to change.
9
(9)
SIGNIFICANT
EVENTS
In
the
second quarter, Carver Federal took steps to accelerate its ongoing efforts
to
improve margins and reduce exposure to interest-only one-to-four family
residential loans. These actions include the reduction of higher cost borrowings
and deposits and lower yielding investments, and the sale of a portion of
the
Bank’s portfolio of interest-only one-to-four-family residential loans.
Specifically, the Bank sold $47.1 million in available-for-sale agency
mortgage-backed securities and reclassified from held-for-investment to
held-for-sale $23.1 million in interest-only one-to-four family loans with
the
intention of selling the loans. Although the loan sale transaction is expected
to close in mid-November, anticipated losses related to the loan sale are
reflected in the second quarter statement of operations as the loans were
reclassified from held-for-investment to held-for-sale. The total pre-tax
charge
for these activities is $1.3 million.
ITEM
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Forward-Looking
Statements
Statements
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which are not historical facts,
are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In
addition, senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to
analysts, investors, the media and others. These forward-looking statements
may
be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,”
“intend,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “may,” “planned,” “estimated,”
“potential,” “outlook,” “predict,” “project” and similar terms and phrases,
including references to assumptions. Forward-looking statements are based on
various assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of the
management's experience and its perception of historical trends, current
conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors believed
to be appropriate under the circumstances. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors,
many of which are beyond the Company’s control that could cause actual results
to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Factors which could result in material variations
include, without limitation, the Company's success in implementing its
initiatives, including expanding its product line, adding new branches and
ATM
centers, successfully re-branding its image and achieving greater operating
efficiencies; increases in competitive pressure among financial institutions
or
non-financial institutions; legislative or regulatory changes which may
adversely affect the Company’s business or the cost of doing business;
technological changes which may be more difficult or expensive than we
anticipate; changes in interest rates which may reduce net interest margins
and
net interest income; changes in deposit flows, loan demand or real estate values
which may adversely affect the Company’s business; changes in accounting
principles, policies or guidelines which may cause the Company’s condition to be
perceived differently; litigation or other matters before regulatory agencies,
whether currently existing or commencing in the future, which may delay the
occurrence or non-occurrence of events longer than anticipated; the ability
of
the Company to originate and purchase loans with attractive terms and acceptable
credit quality; and general economic conditions, either nationally or locally
in
some or all areas in which the Company does business, or conditions in the
securities markets or the banking industry which could affect liquidity in
the
capital markets, the volume of loan origination, deposit flows, real estate
values, the levels of non-interest income and the amount of loan losses.
The
forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this
Form
10-Q, and the Company assumes no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any
obligation to, update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual
results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such
forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could
differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. You should
consider these risks and uncertainties in evaluating forward-looking statements
and you should not place undue reliance on these statements.
As
used
in this Form 10-Q, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the Holding Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Overview
The
following should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial
Statements, the notes thereto and other financial information included in the
Company’s 2006 10-K.
The
Holding Company, a Delaware corporation, is the holding company for Carver
Federal, a federally chartered savings bank, and, on a parent-only basis,
had
minimal results of operations. The Holding Company is headquartered in New
York,
New York. The Holding Company conducts business as a unitary savings and
loan
holding company, and the principal business of the Holding Company consists
of
the operation of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Carver Federal. The Bank is
focused on successfully building its core business by providing superior
customer service while offering a wide range of financial products. As of
September
30, 2006, the Bank operated ten full-service banking locations, four 24/7
ATM
centers and four 24/7 stand-alone ATM locations in the New York City boroughs
of
Brooklyn, Queens and Manhattan, including two branches and one 24/7 stand-alone
ATM acquired with CCB.
10
As
the
largest African- and Caribbean- American operated bank in the United States,
we
are well positioned to address the diverse financial opportunities in urban
markets. Our goal is to build a solid banking franchise while enhancing
shareholder value. We continually focus on expanding our principal businesses
of
mortgage lending and retail banking while maintaining superior asset quality
and
controlling operating expenses. Carver Federal’s net income, like others in the
thrift industry, is dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the
difference between interest income earned on its interest-earning assets such
as
loans, investment and mortgage-backed securities portfolios and the interest
paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings.
The
Bank’s earnings are also affected by general economic and competitive
conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates and government and
regulatory policies. Additionally, net income is affected by any incremental
provision for loan losses, as well as non-interest income and operating
expenses.
On
September 29, 2006, Carver Federal completed its acquisition of CCB, a
Brooklyn-based New York State chartered commercial bank with two branches
and
$165.4 million in total assets. With the acquisition, the Bank gained a business
lending platform, with particular focus on the small business lending area.
Carver Federal acquired Community Capital Bank for $11.9 million in cash,
which
represented $40.00 for each CCB share outstanding and an additional $879,000
in
transaction related costs. During the quarter, the Bank accrued $1.3 million
in
certain merger related expenses associated with the acquisition including
severance, early vendor contract termination fees, and systems integration
and
conversion fees.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2006, the local real estate markets
remained strong and continued to support new and existing lending opportunities.
The Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) paused its policy of monetary
tightening and did not increase the federal funds rate during the quarter.
Previous tightening has resulted in a significantly flattened U.S. Treasury
yield curve. As a result of the rate environment that prevailed throughout
fiscal 2006 and continues in fiscal 2007, Carver Federal pursued a strategy
of
using proceeds from the repayment and maturities of our lower earning investment
portfolio and the growth in deposits to fund higher yielding commercial real
estate and construction loans while at the same time allowing for the repayment
of higher cost borrowings. During September 2006, Carver Federal accelerated
this strategy and executed a series of transactions designed to hasten the
repositioning and deleveraging of the Bank’s balance sheet. The Bank sold $47.1
million in lower yielding investments and used the proceeds to repay certain
higher cost deposits and borrowings. In addition, the Bank reclassified
approximately $23.1 million of interest-only one-to-four- family loans from
held-for-investment to held-for-sale with the intention of liquidating the
loans
and using the proceeds to reduce borrowings further. Carver Federal expects
that
these transactions will improve the Bank’s net interest margin, enhance its
interest rate risk and liquidity profiles, and reduce its exposure to
interest-only one-to-four family loans. Additionally, these transactions
are
expected to be accretive to earnings and thus improve the Bank’s earnings
quality and capital ratios from what they would otherwise be in the absence
of
the repositioning initiative. As a result of these transactions, the Bank
recognized a $1.3 million pre-tax charge during the quarter ending September
30,
2006. While the objective of this strategy is to improve our net interest
income
and net income in future periods through an enhanced net interest margin,
there
is no assurance that this strategy will succeed.
Not
including net assets acquired from CCB, our total loan portfolio increased
during the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in total loans
receivable, net, is primarily the result of increases in construction,
commercial mortgage and business loans, partially offset by decreases in
one-to-four family and multifamily residential loans. Total deposits decreased
during the three months ended September 30, 2006. The decline was primarily
the
result of the Bank’s decision to repay some of its maturing higher cost
deposits. The decrease in our securities and borrowings portfolios during
the
three months ended September 30, 2006 is consistent with our strategy of
reducing these portfolios in response to the continued flat U.S. Treasury
yield
curve and the sale of lower yielding investment securities.
We
incurred a net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared
to
net income for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The decline in
quarterly results was primarily due to the previously discussed charges
related to the Bank’s acquisition of CCB and
the
balance sheet repositioning. Net interest income increased as a result of
the
Bank’s strategy of reducing lower yielding securities and replacing them with
higher yielding loans, while replacing higher cost borrowings with lower
cost
deposits, resulting in an increase in interest income, partially offset by
an
increase in interest expense. Non-interest income decreased primarily due
to
charges related to the previously described balance sheet repositioning.
Non-interest expense increased primarily due to acquisition-related charges
for
CCB, and to a lesser extent, increases in ATM expense, charge-offs from retail
banking operations, consulting expenses and loan servicing expenses.
Net
interest margin and net interest rate spread increased for the three months
ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30,
2005.
These increases were primarily due to the yield on our interest-earning assets
rising more rapidly than the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities as
a
result of the positive momentum achieved from our previously discussed balance
sheet strategy.
We
expect
the operating environment to remain challenging throughout fiscal 2007 as
a flat
to inverted yield curve has exerted pressure on our net interest margin and
has
dampened the volume of loan prepayments and therefore lowered pre-payment
penalty income. As a result, we expect to continue our strategy of using
the
proceeds from the reductions in the securities portfolio through normal cash
flow and the growth in deposits to fund higher yielding real estate and
commercial loans and repay borrowings. Additionally, we understand that scale
is
relevant to our performance growth. As such, we will continue to pursue prudent
acquisitions and alliances that leverage organic growth and accelerate our
expansion strategy.
11
Acquisition
of Community Capital Bank
On
September 29, 2006, the Bank acquired CCB, a Brooklyn-based New York State
chartered commercial bank with approximately $165.4 million in assets and
two
branches in a cash transaction of $11.9 million. Under the terms of the
merger agreement, CCB’s shareholders were paid $40.00 per outstanding share
(including options which immediately vested with the consummation on the
merger)
and the Bank incurred an additional $879,000 in transaction costs related
to
this acquisition. The combined entity will operate under Carver Federal’s thrift
charter and Carver Federal will continue to be supervised by the Office of
Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). The transaction, which was accounted for under the
purchase accounting method, included the recognition of approximately $760,000
of identifiable intangible assets, or core deposit intangible, and excess
of
purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets (“goodwill”) of
$5.1 million. The goodwill and intangible assets from this transaction are
not
deductible for tax purposes.
Formation
of Carver Municipal Bank
On
October 5, 2006, Carver Federal established Carver Municipal Bank (“CMB”), a
wholly owned, New York State chartered limited purpose commercial bank, with
the
intention of expanding Carver Federal’s ability to compete for municipal and
state agency deposits and provide other fee income based services. The Bank
infused $2.0 million of capital into CMB at its formation. In the State of
New
York, certain municipal entities may deposit funds only with commercial banks,
and CMB provides Carver Federal with a platform to enter into this new line
of
business.
New
Markets Tax Credit Allocation
On
June
1, 2006 the Bank was awarded a $59.0 million allocation under the New Markets
Tax Credits (“NMTC”) program from the Community Development Financial
Institution Fund (“CDFI”) of the Department of the Treasury. The award, the
first allocation Carver has received under this highly competitive initiative,
is designed to attract private-sector investment to help finance community
development projects, stimulate economic growth and create jobs in lower
income
communities by providing tax credits to private enterprises who participate.
The
NMTC
program, established by Congress in December 2000 and administered by the
Department of the Treasury’s CDFI Fund, permits certain entities to receive a
credit against federal income taxes for making qualified investments to help
stimulate growth and create jobs in selected communities. The allocation
was
awarded to Carver Community Development Corporation (“CCDC”), a for-profit
subsidiary created by the Bank to administer the initiative. The credit provided
to the Company totals 39% of the award or approximately $23.0 million in
tax
credits, and is to be received over a seven-year period, consistent with
CCDC’s
ability to make loans and other investments meeting CDFI guidelines and subject
to agreements with the CDFI. A portion of the benefit of the tax credit will
be
shared with the community and developers through a variety of means, including
loan pricing and loan products. Tax benefits will begin to accrue after the
agreements are signed and qualifying projects are identified and
funded.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Note
1 to
our audited Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal 2006 included in our
2006 10-K, as supplemented by this report, contains a summary of our significant
accounting policies and is incorporated herein. We believe our policies with
respect to the methodology for our determination of the allowance for loan
losses and asset impairment judgments, including other than temporary declines
in the value of our securities, involve a high degree of complexity and require
management to make subjective judgments which often require assumptions or
estimates about highly uncertain matters. Changes in these judgments,
assumptions or estimates could cause reported results to differ materially.
The
following description of these policies should be read in conjunction with
the
corresponding section of our 2006 10-K.
Securities
Impairment
Carver
Federal’s available-for-sale securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair
value, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as
accumulated other comprehensive loss/income in stockholders’ equity. Securities,
which the Bank has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, are
classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost. The fair
values of securities in our portfolio, which are primarily adjustable rate
mortgage-backed securities at September 30, 2006, are based on published or
securities dealers’ market values and are affected by changes in interest rates.
The Bank periodically reviews
12
and
evaluates the securities portfolio to determine if the decline in the fair
value
of any security below its cost basis is other-than-temporary. The Bank generally
views changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary,
which is consistent with its experience. However, if such a decline is deemed
to
be other-than-temporary, the security is written down to a new cost basis and
the resulting loss is charged to earnings. At September 30, 2006, the Bank
carried no permanently impaired securities.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
Allowance
for loan losses are maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for
probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio as of September 30, 2006.
Management is responsible for determining the adequacy of the allowance for
loan
losses and the periodic provisioning for estimated losses included in the
consolidated financial statements. The evaluation process is undertaken on
a
quarterly basis, but may increase in frequency should conditions arise that
would require management’s prompt attention, such as business combinations and
opportunities to dispose of non-performing and marginally performing loans
by
bulk sale or any development which may indicate an adverse trend.
Carver
Federal maintains a loan review system, which calls for a periodic review of
its
loan portfolio and the early identification of potential problem loans. Such
system takes into consideration, among other things, delinquency status, size
of
loans, type of collateral and financial condition of the borrowers. Loan loss
allowances are established for problem loans based on a review of such
information and/or appraisals of the underlying collateral. On the remainder
of
its loan portfolio, loan loss allowances are based upon a combination of factors
including, but not limited to, actual loan loss experience, composition of
loan
portfolio, current economic conditions and management’s judgment. Although
management believes that adequate loan loss allowances have been established,
actual losses are dependent upon future events and, as such, further additions
to the level of the loan loss allowance may be necessary in the
future.
The
methodology employed for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists
of the following criteria:
· |
Establishment
of reserve amounts for all specifically identified criticized loans
that
have been designated as requiring attention by management’s internal loan
review program, bank regulatory examinations or the Bank’s external
auditors.
|
· |
An
average loss factor, giving effect to historical loss experience
over
several years and linked to cyclical trends, is applied to all loans
not
subject to specific review. These loans include residential one-
to
four-family, multifamily, non-residential and construction loans
and also
include consumer and business loans.
|
Recognition
is also given to the changed risk profile brought about by business
combinations, customer knowledge, the results of ongoing credit quality
monitoring processes and the cyclical nature of economic and business
conditions. An important consideration in applying these methodologies is the
concentration of real estate related loans located in the New York City
metropolitan area.
The
initial allocation or specific-allowance methodology commences with loan
officers and underwriters grading the quality of their loans on an nine-category
risk classification scale. Loans identified from this process as being higher
risk are referred to the Bank’s Internal Asset Review Committee for further
analysis and identification of those factors that may ultimately affect the
full
recovery or collectibility of principal and/or interest. These loans are
subject
to continuous review and monitoring while they remain in the criticized
category. Additionally, the Internal Asset Review Committee is responsible
for
performing periodic reviews of the loan portfolio that are independent from
the
identification process employed by loan officers and underwriters. Gradings
that
fall into criticized categories are further evaluated and reserve amounts
are
established for each loan.
The
second allocation or loss factor approach to common or homogeneous loans is
made
by applying the average loss factor based on several years of loss experience
to
the outstanding balances in each loan category. It gives recognition to the
loss
experience of acquired businesses, business cycle changes and the real estate
components of loans. Since many loans depend upon the sufficiency of collateral,
any adverse trend in the real estate markets could seriously affect underlying
values available to protect against loss.
Other
evidence used to support the amount of the allowance and its components
include:
· Regulatory
examinations
· Amount
and trend of criticized loans
· Actual
losses
· Peer
comparisons with other financial institutions
13
· Economic
data associated with the real estate market in the Company’s lending market
areas
· Opportunities
to dispose of marginally performing loans for cash consideration
A
loan is
considered to be impaired, as defined by SFAS No. 114, “Accounting
by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”
(“SFAS
114”), when it is probable that Carver Federal will be unable to collect all
principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms of the
loan agreement. Carver Federal tests loans covered under SFAS 114 for impairment
if they are on non-accrual status or have been restructured. Consumer credit
non-accrual loans are not tested for impairment because they are included in
large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that, by definition, are
excluded from the scope of SFAS 114. Impaired loans are required to be measured
based upon the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the
loan’s initial effective interest rate, or at the loan’s market price or fair
value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the loan
valuation is less than the recorded value of the loan, an allowance must be
established for the difference. The allowance is established by either an
allocation of the existing allowance for credit losses or by a provision for
credit losses, depending on various circumstances. Allowances are not needed
when credit losses have been recorded so that the recorded investment in an
impaired loan is less than the loan valuation.
At
September 30, 2006, including the $1.2 million allowance for loan losses
acquired from CCB, the Bank considers its allowance to be adequate.
Stock
Repurchase Program
In
August
2002, Carver’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to
acquire up to 231,635 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, or
approximately 10 percent of the then outstanding shares. On October 25, 2005,
the Board of Directors approved accelerating the repurchase of the remaining
148,051 shares under the 2002 stock repurchase program, or up to a $2.5 million
total investment, to take place over the following 18 months. The acceleration
is intended to return capital to shareholders and capitalize on current trading
values, and continue funding stock-based benefit and compensation plans. As
of
September 30, 2006 the Company has purchased a total of 100,274 shares at an
average price of $16.90. Purchases for the stock repurchase program may be
made
from time to time on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions.
The timing and actual number of shares repurchased under the plan depends on
a
variety of factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements,
and
other market conditions.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
is a measure of the Bank’s ability to generate adequate cash to meet its
financial obligations. The principal cash requirements of a financial
institution are to cover potential deposit outflows, fund increases in its
loan
and investment portfolios and cover ongoing operating expenses. The Company’s
primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowed funds and principal and interest
payments on loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities. While
maturities and scheduled amortization of loans, mortgage-backed securities
and
investment securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan
and mortgage-backed securities prepayments are strongly influenced by changes
in
general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
The
Bank
monitors its liquidity utilizing guidelines that are contained in a policy
developed by management of the Bank and approved by the Bank’s Board of
Directors. The Bank’s several liquidity measurements are evaluated on a frequent
basis. Management believes the Bank’s short-term assets have sufficient
liquidity to cover loan demand, potential fluctuations in deposit accounts
and
to meet other anticipated cash requirements. Additionally, the Bank has other
sources of liquidity including the ability to borrow from the Federal Home
Loan
Bank of New York (“FHLB-NY”) utilizing unpledged mortgage-backed securities and
certain mortgage loans, the sale of available-for-sale securities and the sale
of loans. At September 30, 2006, based on available collateral held at the
FHLB-NY the Bank had the ability to borrow from the FHLB-NY an additional
$41.1
million
on a
secured basis, utilizing mortgage-related loans and securities as collateral.
The
unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the change in cash
from
operating, investing and financing activities. During the six months ended
September 30, 2006, total cash and cash equivalents increased by $3.2 million
reflecting cash provided by operating and investing activities offset by cash
used in financing activities. Net cash provided by operating activities during
this period was $7.3 million,
primarily representing proceeds from the sale of loans originated for sale,
cash
provided from operations and satisfaction of receivables included in other
assets offset in part by cash used in the satisfaction of other liabilities
and
cash due from accrued interest receivable on certain assets. Net cash provided
by investing activities was $35.3 million, primarily representing cash received
from principal collections on loans, sale of available-for-sale investment
securities and repayment of principal on securities, partially offset by
disbursements to fund mortgage loan originations, purchases of loans and net
cash used in the acquisition of CCB. Net cash used in financing activities
was
$39.4 million, primarily representing net deposit outflows, net repayments
of
advances from the FHLB-NY, the payment of common dividends and repurchases
of
the Company’s common stock. See “Comparison of Financial Condition at September
30, 2006 and March 31, 2006” for a discussion of the changes in securities,
loans, deposits and FHLB-NY borrowings.
14
The
levels of the Bank’s short-term liquid assets are dependent on the Bank’s
operating, investing and financing activities during any given period. The
most
significant liquidity challenge the Bank faces is variability in its cash flows
as a result of mortgage refinance activity. When mortgage interest rates
decline, customers’ refinance activities tend to accelerate, causing the cash
flow from both the mortgage loan portfolio and the mortgage-backed securities
portfolio to accelerate. In contrast, when mortgage interest rates increase,
refinance activities tend to slow causing a reduction of liquidity. However,
in
a rising rate environment, customers generally tend to prefer fixed rate
mortgage loan products over variable rate products. Since the Bank generally
sells its 15-year and 30-year fixed rate loan production into the secondary
mortgage market, the origination of such products for sale does not
significantly reduce the Bank’s liquidity.
Over
the
past two years, the FOMC raised the federal funds rate fourteen consecutive
times. Although short-term rates have increased, mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities are typically tied to longer-term rates which have
either not increased as dramatically or remained relatively flat. When mortgage
interest rates increase, customers’ refinance activities tend to decelerate,
causing the cash flow from both the mortgage loan portfolio and the
mortgage-backed securities portfolio to decline.
The
OTS
requires that the Bank meet minimum capital requirements. Capital adequacy
is
one of the most important factors used to determine the safety and soundness
of
individual banks and the banking system. At September 30, 2006, the Bank
exceeded all regulatory minimum capital requirements and qualified, under OTS
regulations, as an adequately-capitalized institution.
The
table
below presents certain information relating to the Bank’s capital compliance at
September 30, 2006.
REGULATORY
CAPITAL
|
||||||||
At
September 30, 2006
|
||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Amount
|
%
of Assets
|
||||||
Total
capital (to risk-weighted assets):
|
|||||||
Capital
level
|
$
|
61,322
|
9.79
|
%
|
|||
Less
requirement
|
50,097
|
8.00
|
|||||
Excess
|
$
|
11,225
|
1.79
|
||||
Tier
1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):
|
|||||||
Capital
level
|
$
|
56,100
|
8.96
|
%
|
|||
Less
requirement
|
25,048
|
4.00
|
|||||
Excess
|
$
|
31,052
|
4.96
|
||||
Tier
1 Leverage capital (to adjusted total assets):
|
|||||||
Capital
level
|
$
|
56,100
|
7.24
|
%
|
|||
Less
requirement
|
30,976
|
4.00
|
|||||
Excess
|
$
|
25,124
|
3.24
|
%
|
Comparison
of Financial Condition at September 30, 2006 and March 31,
2006
Assets
Total
assets increased $118.6 million, or 17.9%, to $779.6 million at September
30,
2006 compared to $661.0 million at March 31, 2006. The increase in total
assets
was primarily the result of the acquisition of $165.4 million of CCB assets,
partially
offset by decreases in securities resulting primarily from the sale of $47.1
million of securities in conjunction with the balance sheet
repositioning.
Cash
and
cash equivalents for the six months ended September 30, 2006 increased $3.2
million or 14.1%, to $26.1 million, compared to $22.9 million at March 31,
2006.
The increase was primarily a result of the Bank acquiring an additional $9.5
million in cash and due from banks balances from CCB.
Total
securities decreased $19.2 million, or 17.7%, to $89.1 million at September
30,
2006 from $108.3 million at March 31, 2006 primarily
from the sale of $47.1 million of securities in conjunction with the balance
sheet repositioning
and to a
lesser extent as the portfolio continues to decline from normal cash flows
as a
result of security repayments and maturities. There
15
were
no
new purchases of securities during the quarter. Partially offsetting the
decrease was the $50.7 million of securities acquired with the CCB
acquisition.
Total
loans receivable, net, increased $92.3 million, or 18.7%, to $585.7 million
at
September 30, 2006 from $493.4 million at March 31, 2006. The increase resulted
primarily from $98.8 million of loans acquired from CCB. The acquired loans
consist primarily of $55.3 million in business loans and $44.7 million in
commercial real estate non-residential, including construction loans, net of
a
related $1.2 million in general allowance for loan losses. In addition loan
originations and purchases of $100.6 million exceeded the
$69.4
million
in
repayments during the six months ending September 2006. Loan originations
for the period total $60.4 million and were comprised of
$25.4
million
in
construction, $15.8
million
in non-residential, $14.6
million
in
one-to-four family, $3.6
million
in multifamily, $642,000 in commercial business loans and $261,000
in
consumer loans. Management continues to evaluate yields and loan quality in
the
competitive New York metropolitan area market and in certain instances has
decided to purchase loans to supplement internal originations. Total loan
purchases for the same period last year amounted to $40.2
million
of which $13.5
million
were
construction,
$9.7
million
were
non-residential real estate, $10.2
million
were commercial business and $6.8 were one-to-four family loans. Management
has
reclassified approximately $23.1
million
in one-to-four family loans from held-for-investment to held-for-sale as part
of
the balance sheet repositioning and anticipates liquidating these loans in
the
next fiscal quarter. During the period the Bank sold $6.3 million in loans
held-for-sale at a gain of $88,000. The commercial business loan purchases
were
primarily comprised of New York City taxi medallion loans. Management
also assesses yields and economic risk in determining the balance of
interest-earning assets allocated to loan originations and purchases compared
to
additional purchases of mortgage-backed securities.
The
Bank’s investment in FHLB-NY stock increased by $52,000, or 1.1%, to $4.7
million compared to $4.6 million at March 31, 2006. The increase includes an
additional $653,000 from the CCB acquisition offset in part by redemptions
of
$601,000 of the Bank’s previous holdings. FHLB-NY requires banks to own
membership stock as well as borrowing activity-based stock. The repayment of
FHLB-NY borrowings resulted in the redemption of stock during the
period.
At
September 30, 2006 the Bank reflected preliminary goodwill and core deposit
intangibles of $5.1 million and $760,000, respectively.
Office
property and equipment increased $1.1 million, or 8.6% to $14.3 million at
September 30, 2006 compared to $13.2 million at last fiscal year end. The
acquisition of CCB accounted for $1.2 million of the increase and was partially
offset by depreciation of Carver’s assets held.
Consistent
with increases in loan and securities balances, the Bank's accrued interest
receivable also increased $1.2 million or 39.2% to $4.1 million at September
30,
2006 compared to $3.0 million at March 31, 2006. The increase is primarily
attributed to $990,000 in accrued interest receivable acquired from
CCB.
Other
assets increased $4.1 million, or 57.7%, to $11.2 million at September 30,
2006
from $7.1 million at March 31, 2006. The increase is primarily the result of
$2.6 million in other assets acquired from CCB. These other assets accounts
consist primarily of deferred tax assets of $822,000, tax receivable of
$512,000, prepaid expenses of $390,000, accounts receivable of $194,000 and
various unposted items accounts totaling $673,000. Also contributing to the
increase in other assets is a $1.2 million current tax receivable the Bank
held
at the end of the reporting period.
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
At
September 30, 2006, total liabilities increased by $118.5 million, or 19.4%,
to
$730.8 million compared to $612.3 million at March 31, 2006. The increase in
total liabilities was primarily
the result of the $159.3 million of liabilities acquired with CCB partially
offset by the reduction in deposits and borrowings resulting primarily from
the
repositioning of the balance sheet.
Deposits
increased $119.0 million or 23.6% to $623.6 million at September 30, 2006
from
$504.6 at March 31, 2006. The increase resulted primarily from $144.1 million
of
deposits acquired with CCB. The acquired deposits consist primarily of $113.2
million in certificates of deposit of which $31.7 million are brokered deposits,
$16.2 million in checking accounts, $9.2 million in money market deposits,
$5.1
million in savings accounts and $589,000 in other deposits. Excluding acquired
deposits, at September 30, 2006, the Bank had net outflows of deposits of
$25.2
of which $10.1 million were certificates of deposit, $6.5 million in savings
accounts, $6.4 million in checking accounts and $2.6 million in money market
accounts. The outflow in certificates of deposit primarily resulted from
the
$20.0 million reduction of higher costing deposits as part of the balance
sheet
repositioning.
At
September 30, 2006, the Bank managed ten branches, four 24/7 ATM centers and
four 24/7 stand-alone ATM locations. Management believes that deposits will
grow
as the Bank continues to capitalize on its investment in franchise expansions,
customer service and the offering of a wider array of financial
products.
16
Advances
from the FHLB-NY and other borrowed money decreased $1.1 million, or 1.2% to
$92.7 million at September 30, 2006 compared to $93.8 million at March 31,
2006.
This decrease is primarily the result of the repayment of four matured FHLB-NY
advances: a $13.3 million advance with a cost of 4.94%, a $3.6 million advance
with a cost of 2.54%, a $6.0 million advance with a cost of 3.56% and a $10.0
million advance with a cost of 5.47% partially offset by two new short-term
advances for $7.5 million at a cost of 5.35% and $11.8 million at a cost of
5.57%. The Bank acquired an additional $12.5 million in advances with the
acquisition of CCB. Management, with its commitment to manage the impact of
margin compression, elected to repay these borrowings with available excess
liquidity some of which resulted from the balance sheet repositioning.
Management anticipates selling approximately
$22.4 million
in
one-to-four family loans and utilizing the proceeds to further reduce
borrowings.
Other
liabilities increased $677,000, or 4.9%, to $14.5 million at September 30,
2006
from $13.9 million at March 31, 2006. The increase was primarily attributable
to
the
$2.7
million in other liabilities acquired through the CCB acquisition
and a
$944,000 increase in accrued interest payable on deposits
partially offset by
a $1.7
million payment
of income taxes, $887,000 in net payments made on previously outstanding
accounts payable checks and $310,000 reduction in liabilities related to
loan
servicing.
Stockholders’
Equity
Total
stockholders’ equity increased $71,000 or 0.2%, to $48.8 million at September
30, 2006 compared to $48.7 million at March 31, 2006. The increase in total
stockholders’ equity was primarily attributable to a decrease of $412,000 in
accumulated other comprehensive loss, the decreases of $77,000 in holding
of
treasury stock and an increase in additional paid in capital of $102,000.
The
decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the mark-to-market
of the Bank’s available-for-sale securities, as required by SFAS No. 115
“Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”. Securities
accounted for as held-to-maturity are carried at cost while such securities
designated as available-for-sale are carried at market with any adjustments
made
directly to stockholders’ equity, net of taxes, and does not impact the
Consolidated Statements of Income. The
improvement in accumulated
other comprehensive loss resulted primarily from the sale of securities as
part
of the balance sheet repositioning where the loss recognized in results of
operations. Treasury stock decreased primarily from the distribution of stock
in
for certain compensation plans, net of the purchase an additional 3,700 shares
of its common stock under its stock repurchase program. Partially offsetting
the
increase is a decrease of $532,000 in retained earnings principally resulting
from $102,000 in net loss for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and
dividends of $430,000 paid during the same period.
Asset/Liability
Management
The
Company’s primary earnings source is net interest income, which is affected by
changes in the level of interest rates, the relationship between the rates
on
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the impact of interest
rate fluctuation on asset prepayments, the level and composition of deposits
and
the credit quality of earning assets. Management’s asset/liability objectives
are to maintain a strong, stable net interest margin, to utilize its capital
effectively without taking undue risks, to maintain adequate liquidity and
to
manage its exposure to changes in interest rates.
The
Company’s Asset/Liability and Interest Rate Risk Committee, comprised of members
of the Board of Directors, meets periodically with senior management to evaluate
the impact of changes in market interest rates on assets and liabilities, net
interest margin, capital and liquidity. Risk assessments are governed by Board
policies and limits.
The
economic environment is uncertain regarding future interest rate trends.
Management regularly monitors the Company’s cumulative gap position, which is
the difference between the sensitivity to rate changes on our interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, the Company uses various
tools to monitor and manage interest rate risk, such as a model that projects
net interest income based on increasing or decreasing interest
rates.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The
Bank
is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal
course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers and
in
connection with its overall investment strategy. These instruments involve,
to
varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. In
accordance with GAAP, these instruments are not recorded in the consolidated
financial statements. Such instruments primarily include lending commitments.
Lending
obligations include commitments to originate mortgage and consumer loans
and to
fund unused lines of credit. Additionally, the Bank has contingent liabilities
related to letters of credit.
17
As
of
September 30, 2006, the Bank has outstanding loan commitments and seven letters
of credit as follows:
Outstanding
|
||||
Commitments
|
||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||
Commitments
to fund construction mortgage loans
|
$
|
70,900
|
||
Commitments
to originate other mortgage loans
|
35,545
|
|||
Commitments
to originate/fund consumer and business loans
|
13,452
|
|||
Letters
of credit
|
2,056
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
121,953
|
At
the
end of September the Bank was in contract to sell $23.1 million in one-to-four
family loans to a third party.
The
Bank
also has contractual obligations related to long-term debt obligations and
operating leases. As of September 30, 2006, the Bank has contractual obligations
as follows:
Payments
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
|
Less
than
|
1
- 3
|
3
- 5
|
More
than
|
||||||||||||
Obligations
|
Total
|
1
year
|
years
|
years
|
5
years
|
|||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Long
term debt obligations:
|
||||||||||||||||
FHLB
advances
|
$
|
79,772
|
$
|
50,784
|
$
|
28,807
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
181
|
||||||
Guaranteed
preferred beneficial interest in
|
||||||||||||||||
junior
subordinated debentures
|
12,886
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12,886
|
|||||||||||
Total
long term debt obligations
|
92,658
|
50,784
|
28,807
|
-
|
13,067
|
|||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations:
|
||||||||||||||||
Lease
obligations for rental properties
|
7,146
|
523
|
2,121
|
2,036
|
2,466
|
|||||||||||
Total
contractual obligations
|
$
|
99,804
|
$
|
51,307
|
$
|
30,928
|
$
|
2,036
|
$
|
15,533
|
Analysis
of Earnings
The
Company’s profitability is primarily dependent upon net interest income and
further affected by provisions for loan losses, non-interest income,
non-interest expense and income taxes. The earnings of the Company, which are
principally earnings of the Bank, are significantly affected by general economic
and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates,
and
to a lesser extent by government policies and actions of regulatory
authorities.
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information
relating to Carver’s average interest-earning assets, average interest-bearing
liabilities, net interest income, interest rate spread and interest rate margin.
It reflects the average yield on assets and the average cost of liabilities.
Such yields and costs are derived by dividing annualized income or expense
by
the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods
shown. Average balances are derived from daily or month-end balances as
available. Management does not believe that the use of average monthly balances
instead of average daily balances represents a material difference in
information presented. The average balance of loans includes loans on which
the
Company has discontinued accruing interest. The yield and cost include fees,
which are considered adjustments to yields.
18
CONSOLIDATED
AVERAGE BALANCES
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Three
months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
Earning Assets:
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Yield/Cost
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Yield/Cost
|
|||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loans
(1)
|
$
|
507,492
|
$
|
8,317
|
6.56
|
%
|
$
|
424,882
|
$
|
6,214
|
5.85
|
%
|
|||||||
Total
securities (2)
|
95,664
|
1,010
|
4.22
|
%
|
146,781
|
1,412
|
3.85
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Fed
funds sold
|
3,927
|
53
|
5.35
|
%
|
14,639
|
122
|
3.31
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest earning assets
|
607,083
|
9,380
|
6.18
|
%
|
586,302
|
7,748
|
5.29
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non-interest
earning assets
|
37,927
|
37,090
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
645,010
|
$
|
623,392
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
Bearing Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Checking
|
$
|
23,198
|
16
|
0.27
|
%
|
$
|
24,028
|
18
|
0.30
|
%
|
|||||||||
Savings
and clubs
|
135,629
|
220
|
0.64
|
%
|
137,562
|
226
|
0.65
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
38,584
|
235
|
2.42
|
%
|
40,573
|
160
|
1.56
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
266,942
|
2,549
|
3.79
|
%
|
229,670
|
1,684
|
2.91
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Mortgagor's
deposit
|
1,571
|
6
|
1.52
|
%
|
1,989
|
8
|
1.60
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
465,924
|
3,026
|
2.58
|
%
|
433,822
|
2,096
|
1.92
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Borrowed
money
|
89,531
|
1,143
|
5.06
|
%
|
107,508
|
1,117
|
4.12
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
555,455
|
4,169
|
2.98
|
%
|
541,330
|
3,213
|
2.35
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Demand
|
31,977
|
27,888
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other
Liabilities
|
9,116
|
7,049
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
596,548
|
576,267
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
48,462
|
47,125
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
645,010
|
$
|
623,392
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
5,211
|
$
|
4,535
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
interest rate spread
|
3.20
|
%
|
2.94
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
3.46
|
%
|
3.11
|
%
|
(1)
Includes non-accrual loans
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(2)
Includes FHLB-NY stock
|
19
CONSOLIDATED
AVERAGE BALANCES
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Six
months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
Earning Assets:
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Yield/Cost
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Yield/Cost
|
|||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loans
(1)
|
$
|
500,515
|
$
|
16,208
|
6.48
|
%
|
$
|
421,895
|
$
|
12,421
|
5.89
|
%
|
|||||||
Total
securities (2)
|
102,610
|
2,124
|
4.14
|
%
|
150,594
|
2,811
|
3.73
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Fed
funds sold
|
6,821
|
169
|
4.94
|
%
|
17,347
|
268
|
3.08
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest earning assets
|
609,946
|
18,501
|
6.07
|
%
|
589,836
|
15,500
|
5.26
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non-interest
earning assets
|
37,673
|
36,372
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
647,619
|
$
|
626,208
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
Bearing Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Checking
|
$
|
24,943
|
39
|
0.31
|
%
|
$
|
24,858
|
38
|
0.30
|
%
|
|||||||||
Savings
and clubs
|
137,542
|
443
|
0.64
|
%
|
138,695
|
449
|
0.65
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
39,164
|
477
|
2.43
|
%
|
38,635
|
285
|
1.47
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
264,516
|
5,048
|
3.81
|
%
|
228,540
|
3,177
|
2.77
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Mortgagor's
deposit
|
1,870
|
14
|
1.49
|
%
|
2,290
|
17
|
1.48
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
468,035
|
6,021
|
2.57
|
%
|
433,018
|
3,966
|
1.83
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Borrowed
money
|
89,708
|
2,233
|
4.96
|
%
|
110,907
|
2,298
|
4.13
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
557,743
|
8,254
|
2.95
|
%
|
543,925
|
6,264
|
2.30
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Demand
|
31,562
|
27,660
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other
Liabilities
|
10,075
|
7,767
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
599,380
|
579,352
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
48,239
|
46,856
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
647,619
|
$
|
626,208
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
10,247
|
$
|
9,236
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
interest rate spread
|
3.12
|
%
|
2.96
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
3.37
|
%
|
3.14
|
%
|
(1)
Includes non-accrual loans
|
|||||||||||
(2)
Includes FHLB-NY stock
|
20
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2006
and
2005
Overview.
For the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company reported consolidated net
loss available to
common
stockholders of $904,000, or $0.36 per diluted share compared to net income
of
$601,000, or $0.24 per diluted share for the same period last year. For the
six
months ended September 30, 2006 the Company reported a net loss of $102,000,
or
$0.04 per diluted share compared to net income of $1.4 million, or $0.56
per
diluted share for the six month period ended September 30, 2005. The three
month
period results reflect an increase in non-interest expense of $1.6 million
and a
decrease in non-interest income of $1.4 million. For the quarter ended September
30, 2006 net interest income increased $676,000 and the income tax provision
decreased $793,000 compared to the September 30, 2005 period. For
the
six month period, the change reflects an increase in non-interest expense
of
$1.5 million and a decrease in non-interest income of $1.8 million. Partially
offsetting these decreases to results of operations is an increase of $1.0
million in net interest income and a reduction of income tax provision of
$812,000.
Selected
operating ratios for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005
are set forth in the table below and the following analysis discusses the
changes in components of operating results.
SELECTED
KEY RATIOS
|
|||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||
Selected
Financial Data:
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Return
on average assets (1)
|
-0.56
|
%
|
0.39
|
%
|
-0.03
|
%
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
Return
on average equity (2)
|
-7.46
|
5.10
|
-0.42
|
6.12
|
|||||
Interest
rate spread (3)
|
3.20
|
2.94
|
3.12
|
2.96
|
|||||
Net
interest margin (4)
|
3.46
|
3.11
|
3.37
|
3.14
|
|||||
Operating
expenses to average assets (5)
|
3.87
|
2.97
|
3.40
|
3.03
|
|||||
Efficiency
ratio (6)
|
128.07
|
83.29
|
101.11
|
80.84
|
|||||
Equity-to-assets
(7)
|
6.26
|
7.33
|
6.26
|
7.33
|
|||||
Average
interest-earning assets to
|
|||||||||
interest-bearing
liabilities
|
1.09
|
x
|
1.08
|
x
|
1.09
|
x
|
1.08
|
x
|
(1)
Net income (loss) divided by average total assets,
annualized.
|
|||||||||
(2)
Net income (loss) divided by average total equity,
annualized.
|
|||||||||
(3)
Combined weighted average interest rate earned less combined
weighted average interest rate cost.
|
|||||||||
(4)
Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets,
annualized.
|
|||||||||
(5)
Non-interest expenses less loss on real estate owned divided by
average total assets, annualized.
|
|||||||||
(6)
Operating expenses divided by sum of net interest income after
provision plus non-interest income.
|
|||||||||
(7)
Total equity divided by assets at period end.
|
Interest
Income.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2006, interest income increased by
$1.6
million, or 33.8%, to $9.4 million for the three months ended September
30,
2006, compared to $7.7 million in the prior year period. The increase in
interest income is primarily a result of higher average loan balances and
yields
this fiscal period compared to the prior year period. The increase in interest
income was partially offset by a decline in interest income on total securities.
While the average balance of the securities portfolio declined mainly from
the
sale of held-for-sale securities during the quarter, the yield earned on
the
portfolio increased as a result of the current rate environment. Overall,
the
increase in interest income resulted from an increase of 89 basis points
in the
annualized average yield on total interest-earning assets to 6.18% for
the three
months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 5.29% for the prior year period,
reflecting increases in yields on federal funds, loans and total securities
of
204 basis points, 71 basis points and 37 basis points, respectively.
Additionally, the average balance of total interest earning assets increased
$20.8 million. While CCB’s balances are included in average balance calculations
the effect is not material as the merger was consummated on the last day
of the
quarter.
For
the
six month period ending September 30, 2006, interest income increased $3.0
million, or 19.4% to $18.5 million, compared to $15.5 million for the same
period last year. The rise in interest income was primarily due to an increase
in both yields
21
and
average balances of interest-earning assets of 81 basis points and $20.1
million, respectively. As in the three month results these increases were
primarily driven by increases in yields on federal funds, loans and securities
of 186 basis points, 59 basis points and 41 basis points, respectively. For
the
six month period ending September 30, 2006, there was also an increase in
average loan balances of $78.6 million, however, total securities and federal
funds balances decreased by $48.0 million and $10.5 million,
respectively.
Interest
income on loans increased by $2.1 million, or 33.8%, to $8.3 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $6.2 million for the prior
year period. The change was primarily due to an increase in the average mortgage
loan balances for the quarter of $82.6 million to $507.5 million compared to
$424.9 million for the prior year period. The increase was amplified by a 71
basis points increase in the annualized average yield on loans for the three
months ended September 30, 2006 to 6.56% compared to 5.85% for the prior year
period. Similarly, for the six month period ending September 30, 2006, interest
income on loans increased $3.8 million, or 30.5%, to $16.2 million from $12.4
million for the comparable period last year. This increase was again driven
by
increases of $78.6 million in average balances and 59 basis points in yields.
The year over year growth in loan balance is reflective of management’s
commitment to grow assets primarily through originations and purchases of high
quality mortgage and construction loans for its portfolio at a level that
exceeds loan repayments. The increase in loan yields is reflective of the
current mix of our loan portfolio. For the three- and six- months ended
September 30, 2006, the average balances of commercial real estate and
construction loans were higher compared to the prior year period when
one-to-four and multifamily residential loans were predominant.
Interest
income on total securities decreased by $402,000, or 2.8%, to $1.0 million
for
the three month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $1.4 million for
the
prior year period. For the six month period ending September 30, 2006, total
interest income on securities decreased $687,000, or 2.4%, to $2.1 million
from
$2.8 million for the same period last year. The decrease in interest income
on
securities for the quarter and the year-to-date was primarily the effect of
a
reduction in the average balance of total securities of $51.1 million and $48.0
million for the periods, respectively. The decline in average balances is
attributable to the sale of $47.1 million in available-for-sale investment
securities during the quarter. Also contributing to the decline in the average
balances of securities are normal run-offs due to maturities and repayments
on
securities during the year. For both the three- and six- month periods, the
effect of the decrease in the balance of securities was partially offset by
a
rise in annualized average yield on securities of 37 basis points and 41 basis
points, respectively.
Interest
income on federal funds sold decreased by $69,000 and $99,000 for the three-
and
six- months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same prior year periods.
The decline was primarily attributable to a decrease in the average balance
of
federal funds for the periods partially offset by an increase in the annualized
yields on federal funds sold for the same periods. The reduction in the average
balance of federal funds sold is a result of using excess liquidity to fund
loan
growth and repay borrowings. Yields on federal funds increased year over year
for both periods as the FOMC consistently raised the federal funds rate during
that time.
Interest
Expense. For
the
three month
period
ended September 30, 2006, total interest expense increased by $956,000, or
29.8%, to $4.2 million, compared to $3.2 million for the prior year period.
The
rise resulted primarily from a higher annualized average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities of 63 basis points to 2.98% from 2.35% for the
prior year period. Additionally, the average balance of interest-bearing
liabilities increased $14.1 million, or 2.6%, to $555.5 million from $541.3
million during the prior year period.
During
the six month period ended September 30, 2006, total interest expense increased
by $2.0 million, or 31.8%, to $8.3 million compared to $6.3 million for the
corresponding prior year period. The increase in interest expense is due
to
growth in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities of $13.8 million,
or 2.5%, to $557.7 million from $543.9 million for the corresponding prior
year
period. Also contributing to the increase in total interest expense was an
increase in the annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities of
65
basis points to 2.95% from 2.30% for the corresponding prior year period.
Interest
expense on deposits increased $930,000 or 44.4%, to $3.0 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $2.1 million for the prior year
period. The increase in interest expense on deposits was due primarily to a
$32.1 million, or 7.4%, increase in the average balance of interest-bearing
deposits to $465.9 million for the current quarter from $433.8 million for
the
prior year period. Additionally, a 66 basis point rise in the rate paid on
deposits to 2.58% compared to 1.92% for the prior year period added to the
increase. Customer deposits have historically provided Carver with a relatively
low cost funding source from which its net interest income and net interest
margin have benefited.
The
same
trend continues for the six month comparison on interest cost on deposits.
For
the six month period ended September 30, 2006 interest expense on deposits
increased $2.1 million or 51.8%, to $6.0 million compared to $4.0 million for
the prior year period. The increase in interest expense on deposits was due
primarily to a $35.0 million, or 8.1%, increase in the average balance of
interest-bearing deposits to $468.0 million from $433.0 million for the prior
year period. Additionally, a 74 basis point rise in the rate paid on deposits
to
2.57% compared to 1.83% for the prior year period added to the increase. Year
over year, rates on deposits have increased with the rise in short-term rates,
thus impacting the Bank’s net interest margin.
Interest
expense
on advances and other borrowed money increased $26,000, to $1.1 million for
the
three months ended
22
September
30, 2006 which was virtually unchanged compared to the prior year period. For
the six month period interest expense on advances and borrowed money showed
a
modest decline of $65,000 to $2.2 million from $2.3 million for the prior year
period. In both the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2006, the
average balance of total borrowed money outstanding declined, however, that
decline was offset by increases in the rates paid on these borrowings.
Consistent with balance sheet re-positioning strategy, the Bank’s management has
used opportunities as they arise and liquidity permits to replace matured
FHLB-NY advances with lower cost deposits. The increase in yields for both
the
three and six month periods ending September 30, 2006, is mainly related to
the
cost of debt service of the $13 million in floating rate junior subordinated
notes raised by the Company through an issuance of trust preferred securities
by
Carver Statutory Trust I in September 2003 which has increased to a rate of
8.44% at September 30, 2006 from 6.94% a year earlier.
Net
Interest Income Before Provision for Loan Losses. Net
interest income before the provision for loan losses increased by $676,000,
or
14.9%, to $5.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared
to $4.5 million for the prior year period. For the six month period ending
September 30, 2006, net interest income before the provision for loan losses
increased by $1.0 million, or 10.9%, to $10.2 million, compared to $9.2 million
for the prior year period. The Company’s annualized average interest rate spread
for the three months ended September 30, 2006 increased by 26 basis points
to
3.20% compared to 2.94% in the prior year period. For the six month period
ending September 30, 2006, the Company’s annualized average interest rate spread
increased by 16 basis points to 3.12% compared to 2.96% in the prior year
period. Net interest margin, represented by annualized net interest income
divided by average total interest-earning assets, increased 35 basis points
to
3.46% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from 3.11% in the prior
year
period. For the six month period ending September 30, 2006, net interest margin
increased 23 basis points to 3.37% from 3.14% in the prior year period.
Provision
for Loan Losses and Asset Quality.
The
Company did not provide for additional loan losses reserves as the Company
considers its allowance for loan losses to be adequate for the entire loan
portfolio. During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company recorded
net
recoveries of $5,000 compared to net charge-offs of $17,000 for the prior
year
period. On a year over year basis, Carver recorded net recoveries of $15,000
at
September 30, 2006 compared to net charge-offs of $34,000 year-to-date on
September 30, 2005. At September 30, 2006, the Bank’s allowance for loan losses
was $5.2 million, compared to $4.0 million at March 31, 2006 reflecting the
$1.2
million allowance for loan losses acquired from CCB. For the six month period
the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 154.9%
at
September 30, 2006 compared to 147.1% at March 31, 2006. The ratio of the
allowance for loan losses to total loans receivable was 0.88% at September
30,
2006, compared to 0.81% at March 31, 2006. The Bank plans to continue to
grow
its commercial real estate loan portfolio and expand the business loan portfolio
acquired from CCB. Accordingly, it anticipates provision of additional allowance
for loan losses on an ongoing basis in the future.
At
September 30, 2006, non-performing assets totaled $3.9 million, or 0.66% of
total loans receivable compared to $2.8 million, or 0.55% of total loans
receivable, at March 31, 2006. Non-performing assets include loans 90 days
past
due, non-accrual loans and other real estate owned. The increase in total
non-performing assets was primarily attributable to the acquisition of $1.4
million of nonperforming loans from CCB. As of September 30, 2006, the Bank
held
two real estate owned properties totaling $540,000. Future levels of
non-performing assets will be influenced by economic conditions, including
the
impact of those conditions on our customers, interest rates and other internal
and external factors existing at the time.
Non-Interest
Income. For
the
three month period ended September 30, 2006, non-interest income decreased
$1.4
million, or 132.7%, to a loss of $337,000 compared to income of $1.0 million
for
the same period last year. Non-interest income declined primarily as a result
of
a $702,000 unrealized loss for the lower-of-cost-or-market adjustment taken
on
the Bank’s held-for-sale loans and a $645,000 recognized loss on the sale of
certain available-for-sale investment securities, both related to initiatives
to
restructure the Company’s balance sheet to improve the net interest margin.
Also, for the six month period ended September 30, 2006, non-interest income
decreased by $1.8 million to $607,000 from $2.4 million for the prior
year-to-date resulting primarily from the $1.3 million charge taken in the
second quarter related to the balance sheet re-positioning. Additionally
for the
six month period, there was a $470,000 decrease in loan fees and service
charges
compared to the same period last year, mainly from reduced prepayment penalties
on loans as the refinancing market slows.
Non-Interest
Expense. For
the
three month period ended September 30, 2006, non-interest expense increased
$1.6
million or 34.6%, to $6.2 million compared to $4.6 million for the same period
last year. The increase in non-interest expense was primarily due to the
establishment of a $1.3 million merger expenses related to the CCB acquisition.
Other non-interest expenses also increased primarily due to costs associated
with outsourcing certain internal audit, additional consulting expenses,
loan
expenses and increased telecommunication costs. During the six month period
ended September 30, 2006 non-interest expense increased $1.5 million, or
16.4%
to $11.0 million compared to $9.4 million for the same period last year.
The
increase is also primarily attributable to the merger-related expenses taken
in
the quarter. While the Company’s efficiency ratio exceeds its peers, it reflects
investment in the franchise that the Company believes will result in higher
earnings going forward. In addition, management continues to conduct reviews
of
costs to improve the Company’s efficiency ratio.
23
Income
Tax Expense.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded a loss before
taxes
of $904,000 compared to income of $601,000 for the same period last year.
At the
end of the six month period ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded
a net
loss of $102,000 compared to income of $1.4 million for the same period a
year
earlier. The quarter and year-to-date loss has resulted in income tax benefits
of $464,000 and $19,000, respectively, compared to a tax expense for the
same
periods last year of $329,000 and $793,000, respectively. The
Company will be required to adopt FIN48
as
of
April 1, 2007 and has not yet determined the effect on the consolidated
financial condition or results of operations. For additional disclosure
regarding FIN48 see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6, “Recent
Accounting Pronouncements.”
ITEM
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Quantitative
and qualitative disclosure about market risk is presented at March 31, 2006
in
Item 7A of the Company’s 2006 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference. The
Company believes that there has been no material changes in the Company’s market
risk at September 30, 2006 compared to March 31, 2006.
ITEM
4. Controls
and Procedures
The
Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms
of the SEC. As of September
30,
2006,
the
Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the Company’s principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, respectively), of the effectiveness
of
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures
were
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
we
file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported as and when required and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. Legal
Proceedings
Disclosure
regarding legal proceedings that the Company is a party to is presented in
Note
13 to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2006 10-K and is
incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes with
regard to such legal proceedings since the filing of the 2006 10-K.
ITEM
1A. Risk
Factors
Changes
in interest rates may reduce our net income.
Our
earnings depend largely on the relationship between the yield on our
interest-earning assets, primarily our mortgage loans and mortgage-backed
securities, and the cost of our deposits and borrowings. This relationship,
known as the interest rate spread, is subject to fluctuation and is affected
by
economic and competitive factors which influence market interest rates, the
volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
and
the level of non-performing assets. Fluctuations in market interest rates affect
customer demand for our products and services. We are subject to interest rate
risk to the degree that our interest-bearing liabilities reprice or mature
more
slowly or more rapidly or on a different basis than our interest-earning
assets.
In
addition, the actual amount of time before mortgage loans and mortgage-backed
securities are repaid can be significantly impacted by changes in mortgage
prepayment rates and market interest rates. Mortgage prepayment rates will
vary
due to a number of factors, including the regional economy in the area where
the
underlying mortgages were originated, seasonal factors, demographic variables
and the assumability of the underlying mortgages. However, the major factors
affecting prepayment rates are prevailing interest rates, related mortgage
refinancing opportunities and competition.
24
The
FOMC’s policy of monetary tightening through seventeen consecutive Federal Funds
rate increases from June 2004 through June 2006, resulted in a significant
flattening of the U.S. Treasury yield curve in 2005 and a flat-to-inverted
yield
curve throughout 2006. The pause in Federal Funds rate hikes since June 2006
has
reversed the trend of rising U.S. Treasury yields and resulted in a further
inversion of the yield curve throughout the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
This continued pattern of interest yield curve inversion limits our growth
opportunities and continues to put pressure on our net interest margin. As
a
result, we have continued to pursue our strategy of repositioning the balance
sheet through reduction low yielding securities and high interest-bearing
borrowings while emphasizing deposit and loan growth. Generally, the reduction
in securities and borrowings will occur through maturities of securities
and
repayments of borrowings through normal cash flow.
We
expect
the operating environment to remain very challenging as a result of the
prolonged flat-to-inverted U.S. Treasury yield curve that continues to exert
pressure on our net interest margin and earnings and limits opportunities for
profitable growth. We will, as a result, continue our strategy of reducing
the
investment portfolio through reductions in securities and borrowings, while
we
emphasize deposit and loan growth, all of which should continue to improve
both
the quality of the balance sheet and earnings. While growth opportunities remain
limited, we will continue to focus on the repurchase of our stock as a desirable
use of capital. These strategies should better position us to take advantage
of
more profitable asset growth opportunities when the yield curve
steepens.
Interest
rates do and will continue to fluctuate, and we cannot predict future Federal
Reserve Board actions or other factors that will cause rates to change.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the yield curve will not remain
inverted and that our net interest margin and net interest income will not
remain under pressure through 2007.
Our
results of operations are affected by economic conditions in the New York
metropolitan area and other areas.
Our
retail banking and a significant portion of our lending business are
concentrated in the New York metropolitan area. As a result of this geographic
concentration, our results of operations largely depend upon economic conditions
in this area as well as other areas.
Decreases
in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as
collateral for our loans. Adverse changes in the economy caused by inflation,
recession, unemployment or other factors beyond our control may also have a
negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely loan payments,
which would have an adverse impact on our earnings. Consequently, a
deterioration in economic conditions, particularly in the New York metropolitan
area, could have a material adverse impact on the quality of our loan portfolio,
which could result in an increase in delinquencies, causing a decrease in our
interest income as well as an adverse impact on our loan loss experience, which
would cause an increase in our allowance for loan losses. Such a deterioration
also could adversely impact the demand for our products and services and,
accordingly, our results of operations.
During
the first half of 2006, the real estate market in general was somewhat weaker
than a year ago but continued to support new and existing home sales at albeit
reduced levels. The slowdown in the general housing market is evidenced by
reports of reduced levels of new and existing home sales, increasing inventories
of houses on the market, stagnant to declining property values and an increase
in the length of time houses remain on the market. However, Carver Federal’s
direct local real estate markets exhibit continuing signs of strength, which
appears to be due in part to the limited availability of affordable housing
alternatives in the markets Carver Federal operates.
No
assurance can be given that these conditions will improve or will not worsen
or
that such conditions will not result in a decrease in our interest income or
an
adverse impact on our loan losses.
We
operate in a highly regulated industry, which limits the manner and scope of
our
business activities.
We
are
subject to extensive supervision, regulation and examination by the OTS, by
the
FDIC, and, to a lesser extent, by the New York State Banking Department. As
a
result, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, undertake
new investments and activities and obtain financing. This regulatory structure
is designed primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance funds and
our
depositors, and not to benefit our stockholders. This regulatory structure
also
gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their
supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including
policies with respect to capital levels, the timing and amount of dividend
payments, the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan
loss reserves for regulatory purposes. In addition, we must comply with
significant anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws. Government agencies
have substantial discretion to impose significant monetary penalties on
institutions which fail to comply with these laws.
25
On
October 4, 2006, the OTS and other federal bank regulatory authorities published
the Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Product Risks, or the
Guidance. In general, the Guidance applies to all residential mortgage loan
products that allow borrowers to defer repayment of principal or interest.
The
Guidance describes sound practices for managing risk, as well as marketing,
originating and servicing nontraditional mortgage products, which include,
among
other things, interest only loans. The Guidance sets forth supervisory
expectations with respect to loan terms and underwriting standards, portfolio
and risk management practices and consumer protection. For example, the Guidance
indicates that originating interest only loans with reduced documentation
is
considered a layering of risk and that institutions are expected to demonstrate
mitigating factors to support their underwriting decision and the borrower’s
repayment capacity. Specifically, the Guidance indicates that a lender may
accept a borrower’s statement as to the borrower’s income without obtaining
verification only if there are mitigating factors that clearly minimize the
need
for direct verification of repayment capacity and that, for many borrowers,
institutions should be able to readily document income.
From
time
to time, we may originate and purchase both interest only and interest only
reduced documentation residential loans. We originate such loans for sale to
investors, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, known as Fannie
Mae. We do not originate negative amortization or payment option loans. Reduced
documentation loans include stated income, full asset, or SIFA, loans; stated
income, stated asset, or SISA, loans; and Super Streamline loans. SIFA and
SISA
loans require a prospective borrower to complete a standard mortgage loan
application while the Super Streamline product requires the completion of an
abbreviated application and is in effect considered a “no documentation” loan.
Each of these products requires the receipt of an appraisal of the real estate
used as collateral for the mortgage loan and a credit report on the prospective
borrower. The loans are priced according to our internal risk assessment of
the
loan giving consideration to the loan-to-value ratio, the potential borrower’s
credit scores and various other credit criteria. SIFA loans require the
verification of a potential borrower’s asset information on the loan
application, but not the income information provided.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2006, the Bank did not originate or purchase
any interest only loans for investment portfolio. At September 30, 2006,
our mortgage loan portfolio included $58.6 million of one-to-four family
interest only loans, of which the Bank has contracted to sell $23.1 million
subject to standard secondary market due diligence. The Bank had no
multi-family or commercial real estate interest only loans at September 30,
2006. Non-performing interest only loans totaled $401,000 at September 30,
2006.
We
are
currently evaluating the Guidance to determine our compliance and whether or
not
we need to modify our risk management practices and underwriting guidelines
as
they relate to originations and purchases of the subject loans, or practices
relating to communications with consumers. Therefore, at this time, we cannot
predict the impact the Guidance may have, if any, on our loan origination and
purchase volumes or our underwriting procedures in future periods.
Carver
Federal May Fail to Realize the Anticipated Benefits of the Acquisition.
The
success of Carver Federal’s acquisition of CCB will depend on, among other
things, Carver Federal’s ability to realize anticipated cost savings and to
combine the businesses of Carver Federal and CCB in a manner that does not
materially disrupt the existing customer relationships of Carver Federal or
CCB
or result in decreased revenues from any loss of customers. If Carver Federal
is
not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits
of
the merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize
than expected.
Carver
Federal and CCB expect to be fully integrated by fiscal year end. It is possible
that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the
disruption of Carver Federal’s or CCB’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in
standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect the ability
of Carver Federal to maintain relationships with customers and employees or
to
achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.
For
a
summary of other risk factors relevant to our operations, see Part I, Item
1A,
“Risk Factors,” in our 2006 10-K. There are no other material changes in risk
factors relevant to our operations since March 31, 2006 except as discussed
above.
ITEM
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Holding Company purchased an
additional 3,700 shares of its common stock under its stock repurchase program.
To date, Carver has purchased a total of 100,274 shares of the total 231,635
approved under the program which leaves the number of shares yet to be
repurchased at 131,361. Based on the closing price of Carver’s common stock on
September 30, 2006 of $16.70, the approximate value of the 131,361 shares was
$2,193,729.
26
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Period
|
Total
number of
shares
purchased
|
|
Average
price paid
per
share
|
|
Total
number of shares
as
part of publicly announced plan
|
|
Maximum
number of shares that may yet be purchased under the
plan
|
July
1, 2006 to July 31, 2006
|
900
|
17.47
|
900
|
134,161
|
|||
August
1, 2006 to August 31, 2006
|
2,000
|
16.86
|
2,000
|
132,161
|
|||
September
1, 2006 to September 30, 2006
|
800
|
16.70
|
800
|
131,361
|
|||
ITEM
3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
Not
applicable.
ITEM
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The
Holding Company held its Annual Meeting on September 12, 2006 for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2006.
The
purpose of the Annual Meeting was to vote on the following
proposals:
1. |
the
election of three directors for terms of three years each;
|
2. |
the
ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditors
of the
Holding Company for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2007;
and
|
3. |
the
approval of adoption of the Carver Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive
Plan.
|
The
results of voting were as follows:
Proposal
1:
|
Election
of Directors:
|
|||
Holding
Company Nominees
|
||||
Dr.
Samuel J. Daniel
|
For
|
2,214,090
|
||
Withheld
|
121,097
|
|||
Robert
Holland, Jr.
|
For
|
2,213,465
|
||
Withheld
|
121,722
|
|||
Robert
R. Tarter
|
For
|
2,213,690
|
||
Withheld
|
121,497
|
|||
Proposal
2:
|
Ratification
of Appointment of Independent Auditors
|
For
|
2,206,541
|
|
Against
|
31,743
|
|||
Abstain
|
96,903
|
|||
Proposal
3:
|
Approval
of Adoption of Stock Incentive Plan (1)
|
For
|
1,437,054
|
|
Against
|
581,830
|
|||
Abstain
|
4,107
|
(1)
There
were 312,196 broker held non-voted shares with respect to this
matter.
27
In
addition to the nominees elected at the Annual Meeting, the following persons’
terms of office as directors continued after the Annual Meeting: David L. Hinds,
Pazel Jackson, Jr., Carol Baldwin Moody, Edward Ruggiero, Strauss Zelnick and
Deborah C. Wright.
ITEM
5. Other
Information
Not
applicable.
ITEM
6. Exhibits
The
following exhibits are submitted with this
report:
|
Exhibit
11. Computation
of Earnings (Loss) Per Share.
Exhibit
31.1 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit
31.2 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit
32.1(*) Written
Statement of Chief Executive Officer furnished pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
Exhibit
32.2(*) Written
Statement of Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
*
Pursuant to SEC rules, this exhibit will not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act or be otherwise subject to the liability of
that
section.
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
CARVER
BANCORP, INC.
Date:
November 14,
2006
/s/
Deborah C. Wright
Deborah
C. Wright
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
Date:
November 14,
2006
/s/
William C. Gray
William
C. Gray
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
29